alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered December 18 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00100 - CR CHRISTOPHER ROMMELL MCKINNEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal fro m the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19 - 75306 - M

O RDER Before the Court is appellant ’ s December 16 , 2020 second motion for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief due on Febru ary 12 , 202 1

. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
exhibit1011descriptionof






                                                                                              Exhibit 10.11                                         DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS                                       FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS       For  the period between each annual meeting  of shareholders (the “Board Year”), non-employee directors   receive the following compensation:        • an annual equity award of $195,000 granted in shares of State Street common stock; and       • an annual retainer of $90,000, plus the following additional annual retainers:               •  Lead Director: $125,000;               •  Examining and Audit Committee Chair and Risk Committee Chair: $30,000;                •  Human Resources Committee Chair: $25,000;                •  Nominating  and  Corporate Governance  Committee   Chair  and Technology and Operations                  Committee  Chair: $20,000; and                •  Each member of the Examining and Audit Committee and each member of the Risk Committee,                  other than the Lead Director and the Committee Chairs: $20,000.       Each retainer is payable at the director’s election in shares of State Street common stock or in cash. All  awards of  shares of State Street common stock are calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on  the NYSE   on the date of election (or the date of joining the Board, if later), rounded up to the nearest whole  share. Annual  retainers and annual equity awards  are prorated for any director joining the Board after the  beginning of the Board Year.       Beginning with the eleventh Board meeting attended during the Board Year, each non-employee director is  entitled to meeting fees of $1,500 per Board meeting attended, payable in cash.       Pursuant to State Street’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, directors may elect to defer the receipt  of 0% or 100% of their (1) retainers, (2) annual equity award and/or (3) meeting fees. Non-employee directors also  may elect to receive their retainers in cash or shares of State Street common stock. Non-employee directors who  elect to defer the cash payment  of their retainers or meeting fees may choose from four notional investment  fund returns for such  deferred  cash. Deferrals of common   stock are  adjusted to reflect the hypothetical  reinvestment in additional shares of common stock for any dividends or distributions on State Street common  stock. Deferred amounts  will be paid (a) as elected by the non-employee director, on either the date of their  termination of service on the Board or on the earlier of such termination and a future date specified, and (b) in the  form elected by the non-employee director as either a lump sum or in installments over a two- to five-year period.       Non-employee  directors are also entitled to reimbursement of expenses incurred in attending Board and  committee meetings.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 651

To direct the President to establish a commission for making

recommendations to improve the Federal emergency management system.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mr. ANDREWS (for himself, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. HOYER),

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the President to establish a commission for making

recommendations to improve the Federal emergency

management system.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Presidential FEMA

5 Reform Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. COMMISSION ON FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGE7 MENT REFORM.

8 (a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 90 days after

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall
2

•HR 651 IH

1 establish a commission to review the Federal emergency

2 management system for the purpose of making rec3 ommendations for improving such system.

4 (b) COMPOSITION.—The commission established

5 under this section shall be composed of such members as

6 the President shall appoint. Such members may include—

7 (1) representatives of the emergency manage8 ment community;

9 (2) representatives of State and local govern10 ments, including governments having jurisdiction

11 over areas which have recently been struck by disas12 ters and emergencies which warranted a Federal re13 sponse; and

14 (3) officials of the Federal Government who

15 have responsibilities for responding to disasters and

16 emergencies.

17 SEC. 3. REPORT.

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the

19 date of its establishment under section 2, the commission

20 shall submit to the President and Congress a report which

21 makes specific recommendations for improving the Fed22 eral emergency management system.

23 (b) MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.—The report under

24 this section shall include, at a minimum, specific rec25 ommendations for—
3

•HR 651 IH

1 (1) administrative reform in existing agencies

2 that have responsibility for responding to disasters

3 and emergencies in the United States;

4 (2) Federal legislation necessary to implement

5 the recommendations of the commission; and

6 (3) improving State and local emergency man7 agement systems.

Æ
Exhibit 15.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports datedApril 26, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2012.We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136168 effective July 31, 2006, File No. 333-157356 effective February 17, 2009 and FileNo. 333-176849 effective September 15, 2011) and Form F-3 (File No. 333-177250 effective December 2, 2011). 

/s/ Grant Thornton India LLP

Mumbai, India 

April 26, 2012
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                                                                                                       Exhibit 12

                                                GARDNER DENVER, INC.
                                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                               (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


<CAPTION>

                                                                        YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                            2004        2003        2002        2001       2000
<S>                                                       <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings:
  Income before income taxes                              $52,286      30,358      28,827      34,683     29,894
  Fixed charges                                            12,704       6,019       7,483       7,789      8,486

                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------

    Earnings, as defined                                  $64,990      36,377      36,310      42,472     38,380


Fixed Charges:
  Interest expense                                        $10,102       4,748       6,365       6,796      7,669
  Rentals-portion representative of interest                2,602       1,271       1,118         993        817
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------

    Total fixed charges                                   $12,704       6,019       7,483       7,789      8,486



Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                           5.1x        6.0x        4.9x        5.5x       4.5x
                                                       ----------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
#### Perl Smith, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. Lindy L. Glover, Defendant-Counterplaintiff-Appellee.

Gen. No. 66-25.

Fifth District.

October 11, 1966.

Conger, Elliott & Feehtig, of Carmi, for appellant; Gosnell & Benecki, of Lawrenceville (Edward Benecki and Charles Quindry, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDENHERSH.

Not to be published in full.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

d0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

142355 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142355 

 COA: 292876 

St. Joseph CC: 08-014948-FC 

STEPHNEE LYNN SMITH, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BLS Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Brittany Prager, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BLS Media, Inc., and will be retained by BLS Media, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
      Brittany PragerBrittany
      Prager
                    Chief
      Executive OfficerDate: May 14,
      2008
#### UNITED LANDS CO., *Inc.,*v. PAN-AMERICAN PRODUCTION CO.

No. 17820.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 7, 1943.

Writ of Certiorari Denied June 21, 1943.

For former opinion, see 13 So.2d 519.

Miller & Bloch, of New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Liskow & Lewis, of Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

In an application for rehearing counsel for defendant state that we erroneously adopted as a premise that the oil which was delivered by Pan-American Production Company to Roshko was sold and that the former had received, or would receive, payment therefor. Counsel state that “the record does not support that premise but merely shows the delivery of oil having a certain value.”

*85We are suprised by this statement. The ■case was submitted on an agreed stipulation reading, in part, as follows: “This case should be submitted on the allegations of the petition as admitted in the answer, and the documents listed above, ** *

In Article VII of plaintiff’s petition it is alleged that “defendant claims that it sold to said Roshko for use by him on the said land * * * ” certain oil.

Defendant answered this allegation as follows: “Defendant admits the allegations of fact set forth in Paragraph VII of plaintiff’s petition * *

If defendant desired to contend that the oil had not been “sold” to Roshko but had been delivered to him without charge, to be used in drilling operations, surely this contention should have been set forth in answer to Article VII of the petition. It should not have admitted that its contention was that it sold the oil but that, for other reasons, it should be required to pay the royalty. The word “sold”, as it is used in the petition, clearly indicates the payment of a purchase price or the obligation to pay a purchase price. No where, in this entire record or in the brief of defendant, do we find this contention set forth, or even hinted at, except in the application for rehearing.

The rehearing is refused.

Rehearing refused.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19183]



[[Page 48396]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,817]


JHP Transport LLC, Myerstown, Pennsylvania; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on August 5, 2008, in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at JHP 
Transport LLC, Myerstown, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of August 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-19183 Filed 8-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   I, Hugh Aird, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of American Lithium Minerals, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.  Date:    January 6, 2010   /s/ Hugh Aird Hugh Aird, Chief Executive Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4293

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for public disclosure

of the amounts of Federal funds used to conduct field examinations

of appropriation estimates.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, and Mr. HOKE) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for public

disclosure of the amounts of Federal funds used to conduct field examinations of appropriation estimates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF AMOUNTS USED FOR

4 FIELD EXAMINATIONS OF APPROPRIATION

5 ESTIMATES.

6 Section 1108(g) of title 31, United States Code, is

7 amended—

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(g)’’; and
2

•HR 4293 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end the following new

2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) The head of each agency shall publish in the

4 Federal Register on a monthly basis notice containing the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(A) All amounts of the agency (if any) made

7 available during the previous month for field exami8 nations of appropriations estimates.

9 ‘‘(B) The purpose of each such field examina10 tion.

11 ‘‘(C) The location at which the field examina12 tion was conducted.

13 ‘‘(D) The identity of all Members of Congress,

14 congressional staff, and officers and employees of

15 the agency who participated in the field examina16 tion.’’.

Æ
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6087 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 7), 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code, to 

cover, for purposes of workers’ compensation under such 

chapter, services by physician assistants and nurse practitioners provided to injured Federal workers, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6087 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

3 Workers’ Compensation for Injured Federal Workers Act 

4 of 2022’’. 

5 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS AND NURSE 

6 PRACTITIONERS IN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES’ 

7 COMPENSATION ACT. 

8 (a) INCLUSION.—Section 8101 of title 5, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘, other eligi11 ble providers,’’ after ‘‘osteopathic practitioners’’; 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraphs 

13 (18) and (19); 

14 (3) by striking the period at the end of para15 graph (20) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

16 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

17 ‘‘(21) ‘other eligible provider’ means a nurse 

18 practitioner or physician assistant within the scope 

19 of their practice as defined by State law.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Chapter 81 of 

21 title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

22 (1) in section 8103(a)— 

23 (A) by inserting ‘‘or other eligible pro24 vider’’ after ‘‘physician’’ in each instance; and 

25 (B) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or 

26 other eligible providers’’ after ‘‘physicians’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6087 RFS

1 (2) in section 8121(6), by inserting ‘‘or other 

2 eligible provider’’ after ‘‘physician’’; and 

3 (3) in section 8123(a)— 

4 (A) by inserting ‘‘or other eligible pro5 vider’’ after ‘‘The employee may have a physi6 cian’’; and 

7 (B) by inserting ‘‘or other eligible pro8 vider’’ after ‘‘United States and the physician’’. 

9 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 6 months after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall final11 ize rules to carry out the amendments made by this Act. 

12 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

13 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

14 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

15 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

16 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

17 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

18 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro19 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

20 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Under 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except in

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-31245

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEONARD N. HEDRICK,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CR-10011-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

June 25, 1998

Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Leonard N. Hedrick appeals the district court’s order

affirming his bench trial conviction before a magistrate judge

for taking and aiding and abetting others in taking migratory

birds with the aid of bait in violation of 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50

C.F.R. § 20.21(i). We have reviewed the record and Hedrick’s

arguments on appeal. We find that his conviction is supported by

sufficient evidence. When all the evidence is considered and the

inferences that are drawn are all in favor of the verdict, a

rational trier of fact could have found that Hedrick’s fields 
No. 97-31245

-2-

were not baited as part of a bona fide agricultural operation. 

See 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(I); United States v. Sylvester, 848 F.2d

520, 522 (5th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 13.1




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Weidong Hong, Chief Executive Officer of Yucheng Technologies Limited (the “Company”), certify, to my knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 30, 2011





/s/ Weidong HongName: Weidong HongTitle: Chief Executive Officer








The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.