alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 704 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 704

 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
  to authorize donation of surplus Federal law enforcement canines to 
                            their handlers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1995

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 
  to authorize donation of surplus Federal law enforcement canines to 
                            their handlers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO DONATE SURPLUS LAW ENFORCEMENT CANINES TO 
              THEIR HANDLERS.

    Section 203 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act 
of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 484) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(r) The head of a Federal agency having control of a canine that 
has been used by a Federal agency in the performance of law enforcement 
duties and that has been determined to be surplus property may donate 
the canine to an individual who was responsible for handling the canine 
in the performance of those duties.''.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wntteb**$)tate~ ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI~** 

# fortbejfeberaI**~trtutt**

IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, 

### v. LEGGETT & 

### PLATT, INC. AND 

### SIMMONS BEDDING COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants, AND 

### DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.

2012-1313 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in case no. 10-CV-7416, Judge R. Gary KIausner. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Leggett 

### & Platt, Inc. and Simmons Bedding Company move without opposition to withdraw Donald 

### E. Tiller as counsel. Case: 12-1313 Document: 39 Page: 1 Filed: 10/15/2012IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. 2 

### Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

### The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT 

### /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s26 Case: 12-1313 Document: 39 Page: 2 Filed: 10/15/2012
#### The State, ex rel. Niederlehner, *v.*Ryan, Judge.

(No. 23470

Decided May 25, 1932.)

*Mr. J. G.*Williams, for relator.

*Mr. John M. McCaslin,*for respondent.

The Court find that the petition does not state a cause of action and the demurrer is therefore sustained upon the authority of and for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this Court in the case of *Waldron v*. *New York Central Ry. Co.,*106 Ohio St., 371. And said relator not desiring to plead further, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the writ of mandamus prayed for be, and the same is hereby, denied:

*Writ denied.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles E. Shattuck, Appellant.

Remittitur of Court of Appeals ordered returned to this court from Monroe County Court, motion for reargument granted, reargument heard and judgment of conviction reversed. All concurred.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



         As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the use of our report,
dated February 13, 1997, on the financial statements of Orgenics Ltd. included
in this Form 10-KSB, and to the incorporation of our report into Selfcare,
Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-37961, 333-45534,
and 333-15583, as amended.





                                        KOST LEVARY AND FORER
                                        Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
                                        a Member of Ernst & Young International







March 26, 1998
Tel-Aviv, Israel


                                       39
**
**Exhibit 32.3**

**American Campus Communities Operating Partnership LP – Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, William C. Bayless, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of American Campus Communities, Inc., the sole member of American Campus Communities Holdings LLC, thegeneral partner of American Campus Communities Operating Partnership LP (the “Operating Partnership”), certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 
(i)
The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Operating Partnership for theannual period ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and 

 
(ii)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Operating Partnership. 

 
Dated: April 23, 2019  By:   /s/ William C. Bayless, Jr.   William C. Bayless, Jr.   Chief Executive Officer
This certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Operating Partnership and will be retained by the Operating Partnership andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-80]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)( 1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-80 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 15, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 49996)          ( print page 49997)          ( print page 49998)          ( print page 49999)          ( print page 50000)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-19500 Filed 8-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Calpine Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge, based upon a review of the Report:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



| |  |                                    |  |  |  |                              |  | 
| |  | ---------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ JACK A. FUSCO                  |  |  |  | /s/ ZAMIR RAUF               |  | 
| |  | Jack A. Fusco                      |  |  |  | Zamir Rauf                   |  | 
| |  | President, Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and |  | 
| |  | and Director                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      |  | 
| |  | Calpine Corporation                |  |  |  | Calpine Corporation          |  | 

Dated: February 24, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Calpine Corporation and will be retained by Calpine Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0146

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JUSTIN DOUGLAS DAY,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 5, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 28 2022

01/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0146
Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 

Port Wing Development Co., Ltd. (“e-Channels BVI”),incorporated in the British Virgin Islands

Ahead Billion Venture Ltd. (“Sihitech BVI”). incorporatedin the British Virgin Islands

Beijing Yuxinyicheng Technologies Ltd. (“Yuxinyicheng”),incorporated in the PRC

Beijing e-Channels Century Technology Co., Ltd. (“e-Channels”), incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Sihitech Technology Co., Ltd.(“Beijing Sihitech”),incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Sihitech Software Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Software”),incorporated in the PRC

Shanghai Sihitech Technology Co., Ltd.(“Shanghai Sihitech”),incorporated in the PRC

Shanghai Yuxinyicheng Software Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Software”),incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Yuxinhengsheng Information Technology Limited(“Sunrisk”), incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Easycon Electronics Limited(“Easycon”) ,incorporated in the PRC

Beijing Yuxinyicheng Software Co., Ltd (“YuxinyichengSoftware”), incorporated in the PRC

Chengdu Recency Technologies Limited(“Recency”), incorporated in the PRC

ChengduYuxinyicheng Technologies Ltd. (“Chengdu Yuxinyicheng”),incorporated in the PRC

Shanghai Fujie Business Consulting Limited(“Fujie”), incorporated in the PRC

Guangzhou Yuxinyicheng Information Technology Limited(“GuangzhouYuxinyicheng”) , incorporated in the PRC

Xiamen Yucheng Technology Limited(“Xiamen Yucheng”),incorporated in the PRC

Tianjin Yuxinyicheng Technology Limited(“Tianjin Yuxinyicheng”),incorporated in the PRC

Tianjin Yuchengxin Information Security Technologies Limited(“Yuchengxin”), incorporated in the PRC
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10



                                  (WCRA LOGO)


                                      2005
                           CERTIFICATE OF REINSURANCE
                                    for the
                            AGREEMENT OF REINSURANCE
                                  between the
                 WORKERS' COMPENSATION REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION
                                      and
                                    RTW INC
                American Compensation Insurance Company 0030392







COVERAGE PERIOD: January 1, 2005 - December 31, 2005   RETENTION LIMIT: $380,000
                 (12:01 a.m. Standard Time)

This certifies that the entities named above are Members of the Workers'
Compensation Reinsurance Association (WCRA), and that the WCRA reinsures the
Members' liability during the indicated coverage period for benefits pursuant to
Minn. Stat. Ch. 176 in excess of the Members' retention limit for the period
indicated above. This certificate provides for coverage in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the Reinsurance Agreement approved by the Commissioner
of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry on January 4, 2005. This
certificate shall not be valid for any portion of the indicated period during
which an entity is not a Member of the Association.


                                    /s/ CARL W. CUMMINS III
                                    Carl W. Cummins III
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Dated: January 5, 2005

                Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Association(R)
           Suite 1700, 400 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101
               Phone: 651.293.0999 Fax: 651.229.1848 www.wcra.biz
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6163 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to direct a study on soil health 

of Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to direct a study 

on soil health of Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Study on Improving 

5 Lands Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY. 

7 The Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the 

8 Secretary of the Interior, shall direct the National Acad9 emies of Science to study and report on the state of soil 

10 health on Federal lands in the United States. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6163 IH

1 SEC. 3. DUTIES. 

2 The National Academies of Science shall determine 

3 the parameters by which to measure soil health, includ4 ing— 

5 (1) soil organic matter and other measure6 ments; 

7 (2) soil qualities that lead to the sequester of 

8 carbon; and 

9 (3) soil qualities that support strong ecosystems 

10 and resilient environments. 

11 SEC. 4. DATABASE. 

12 Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 

13 of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination 

14 with the Secretary of the Interior and the National Acad15 emies of Science, shall— 

16 (1) commence a study on the state of soil 

17 health on Federal lands that determines impacts 

18 such as grazing, wildfire, recreation, invasive species, 

19 and other relevant impacts on soil health on Federal 

20 lands; and 

21 (2) create a database of the information col22 lected during the study. 

23 SEC. 5. REPORT TO CONGRESS. 

24 (a) ANNUAL REPORTS.—Not later than 180 days 

25 after the commencement of the study under section 4, and 

26 annually thereafter, the Secretary of Agriculture shall 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6163 IH

1 evaluate the progress of that study and report any short2 term findings to the Committee on Natural Resources and 

3 the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representa4 tives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Re5 sources and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

6 Forestry of the Senate. 

7 (b) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not later 

8 than 2 years after the commencement of the study under 

9 this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to the 

10 Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on 

11 Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Com12 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources and the Com13 mittee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Sen14 ate a report summarizing the results of the study together 

15 with any recommendations for legislative or regulatory ac16 tion to improve soil health, increase carbon sequestration, 

17 and improve community benefits of soil health programs 

18 on Federal lands. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1

The Honorable Ralph R. Erickson, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3770

___________

Abraham A. Ungar, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of North Dakota.

North Dakota State University, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant-Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 27, 2009

Filed: March 6, 2009

___________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Abraham A. Ungar appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his employment-discrimination action. Based on our de novo review, see

Clegg v. Arkansas Department of Corrections, 496 F.3d 922, 926 (8th Cir. 2007), we

agree with the district court’s analysis of the merits of Ungar’s claims and its

conclusion that there were no trialworthy issues. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gardner Denver, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ross J. Centanni, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.


                                             /s/ Ross J. Centanni
                                             ----------------------------
                                                 Ross J. Centanni
                                                 Chairman, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Gardner Denver, Inc.
                                                 March 15, 2005
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. TODD MICHAEL GIFFEN,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 30174

D.C. No. 6:18

- mj

- 00236

- MK

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mustafa T. Kasubhai, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 4, 2021 * * Portland, Oregon
Before: BOGGS, ** * PAEZ, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Todd Michael Giffen was charged with making threats via interstate communication and stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 875(c) and 2261A. He

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Ru le 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit , sitting by designation. 

# FILED

MAR 8 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALSPage 2 of 3

appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation that Giffen be found incompetent to stand tr ial. We affirm.

1. In addition to challenging the district court’s competency determination, Giffen alleges that (1) the magistrate judge erred in ordering a competency evaluation and delaying the preliminary hearing , and (2) that he received

ineffectiv e assistance of counsel at his initial appearance. We lack jurisdiction to consider these claims as only the competency determination is a collateral order subject to interlocutory review

. United States v. Friedman , 366 F.3d 975, 978

– 79 (9th Cir. 2004).

2. We review the district court’s determination that Giffen was incompetent

to stand trial for clear error. Id. at 980. A defendant is incompetent if the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that “he is unable to understand the

nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his
defense.” 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d). Dr. Cynthia Low, a forensic psychologist at the

Bureau of Prisons , interviewed Giffen and conducted a review of his records. She diagnosed him with schizophrenia and c oncluded that he maintains a “bizarre delusionary system” in which he is the victim of government mind control and torture. She also testified that Giffen believes his victimization would provide a complete defense to the charges against him and that judges, prosecutors, and
attorney s can engage in three

- way mental communication with one another

.Page 3 of 3

Giffen’s own testimony at the competency hearing merely corroborated the forensic psychologist’s conclusions. The court acted well within its discretion in crediting Dr. Low’s testimony ove r the contrary opinion of Giffen’s one

- time therapist, Dr. Seth Farber

. AFFIRMED.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3222

_____________________________

DEXTER DEERING,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

August 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and MAKAR and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Dexter Deering, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.