49162 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 5 th day of 

August 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import 

Administration. 

Alternate Chairman. 

Foreign–Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8–19321 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On February 13, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published its 

preliminary results and partial 

rescission in the antidumping duty 

administrative review and new shipper 

review of wooden bedroom furniture 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) 

for the administrative review and the 

new shipper review is January 1, 2006, 

through December 31, 2006. In the 

administrative review, we have 

determined that all three mandatory 

respondents (i.e., Fujian Lianfu Forestry 

Co./Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc./Fuzhou 

Huan Mei Furniture Co., Ltd./Jiangsu 

Dare Furniture Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

‘‘the Dare Group’’); Shanghai Starcorp 

Furniture Co., Ltd, Starcorp Furniture 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Orin Furniture 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai Star 

Furniture Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Xing 

Ding Furniture Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Starcorp’’); and Teamway 

Furniture (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd., and 

Brittomart Inc. (collectively 

‘‘Teamway’’)) made sales in the United 

States at prices below normal value. 

With respect to the remaining 

respondents in the administrative 

review (collectively, ‘‘Separate Rate 

Applicants’’), we determined that 27 

entities have provided sufficient 

evidence that they are separate from the 

state-controlled entity, and we have 

established a weighted-average margin 

based on the rates for the three 

mandatory respondents, excluding any 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on adverse facts available 

(‘‘AFA’’), to be applied to these 

separate-rate entities. For the new 

shipper review, the Department also 

reviewed one exporter/producer, Mei Jia 

Ju Furniture Industrial (Shenzhen) Co. 

Ltd. (‘‘Mei Jia Ju’’). We invited 

interested parties to comment on our 

preliminary results in these reviews. We 

received no comments in the new 

shipper review. Based on our analysis of 

the comments we received in the 

administrative review, we made certain 

changes to our calculations for all 

mandatory respondents. The final 

dumping margins for this review are 

listed in the ‘‘Final Results Margins’’

section below. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz or Robert Bolling, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4474 and (202) 

482–3434, respectively. 

Background 

The Department published its 

preliminary results on February 13, 

2008. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Results of New Shipper 

Review and Partial Rescission of 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 8273 

(February 13, 2008) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). The Department conducted 

verification of two of the mandatory 

respondents’ data in the PRC. See 

‘‘Verification’’ section, below, for 

additional information. 

On June 23, 2008, the Department 

extended the deadline for the final 

results of review to August 11, 2008. See 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Time Limits for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Reviews, 73 

FR 35369 (June 23, 2008). We invited 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results. We received comments from 

petitioners American Furniture 

Manufacturers Committee for Legal 

Trade and Vaughan-Bassett Furniture 

Company, certain mandatory 

respondents, certain Separate-Rate 

Applicants, and other interested parties 

to this review. Interested parties 

submitted case and rebuttal briefs on 

July 18 and July 23, 2008, respectively. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties in this review 

are addressed in the memorandum from 

Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Import Administration, to 

David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration, ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Review of Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China,’’ dated August 11, 2008, which is 

hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues 

and Decision Memorandum’’). A list of 

the issues which parties raised and to 

which we respond in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file in the Central 

Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Main Commerce 

Building, Room 1117, and is accessible 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. 

The paper copy and electronic version 

of the memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Period of Review 

The POR is January 1, 2006, through 

December 31, 2006. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the order is 

wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden 

bedroom furniture is generally, but not 

exclusively, designed, manufactured, 

and offered for sale in coordinated 

groups, or bedrooms, in which all of the 

individual pieces are of approximately 

the same style and approximately the 

same material and/or finish. The subject 

merchandise is made substantially of 

wood products, including both solid 

wood and also engineered wood 

products made from wood particles, 

fibers, or other wooden materials such 

as plywood, oriented strand board, 

particle board, and fiberboard, with or 

without wood veneers, wood overlays, 

or laminates, with or without non-wood 

components or trim such as metal, 

marble, leather, glass, plastic, or other 

resins, and whether or not assembled, 

completed, or finished. 

The subject merchandise includes the 

following items: (1) Wooden beds such 

as loft beds, bunk beds, and other beds; 

(2) wooden headboards for beds 

(whether stand-alone or attached to side 

rails), wooden footboards for beds, 

wooden side rails for beds, and wooden 

canopies for beds; (3) night tables, night 

stands, dressers, commodes, bureaus, 

mule chests, gentlemen’s chests, 

bachelor’s chests, lingerie chests, 

wardrobes, vanities, chessers, 

chifforobes, and wardrobe-type cabinets; 

(4) dressers with framed glass mirrors 

that are attached to, incorporated in, sit 

on, or hang over the dresser; (5) chestsVerDate Aug<31>2005 15:36 Aug 19, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM 20AUN1

dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 49163 

1A chest-on-chest is typically a tall chest-ofdrawers in two or more sections (or appearing to be 

in two or more sections), with one or two sections 

mounted (or appearing to be mounted) on a slightly 

larger chest; also known as a tallboy. 2A highboy is typically a tall chest of drawers 

usually composed of a base and a top section with 

drawers, and supported on four legs or a small chest 

(often 15 inches or more in height). 3A lowboy is typically a short chest of drawers, 

not more than four feet high, normally set on short 

legs. 4A chest of drawers is typically a case containing 

drawers for storing clothing. 5A chest is typically a case piece taller than it 

is wide featuring a series of drawers and with or 

without one or more doors for storing clothing. The 

piece can either include drawers or be designed as 

a large box incorporating a lid. 6A door chest is typically a chest with hinged 

doors to store clothing, whether or not containing 

drawers. The piece may also include shelves for 

televisions and other entertainment electronics. 7A chiffonier is typically a tall and narrow chest 

of drawers normally used for storing undergarments 

and lingerie, often with mirror(s) attached. 8A hutch is typically an open case of furniture 

with shelves that typically sits on another piece of 

furniture and provides storage for clothes. 9An armoire is typically a tall cabinet or 

wardrobe (typically 50 inches or taller), with doors, 

and with one or more drawers (either exterior below 

or above the doors or interior behind the doors), 

shelves, and/or garment rods or other apparatus for 

storing clothes. Bedroom armoires may also be used 

to hold television receivers and/or other audiovisual entertainment systems. 10As used herein, bentwood means solid wood 

made pliable. Bentwood is wood that is brought to 

a curved shape by bending it while made pliable 

with moist heat or other agency and then set by 

cooling or drying. See Customs’ Headquarters’

Ruling Letter 043859, dated May 17, 1976. 

11Any armoire, cabinet or other accent item for 

the purpose of storing jewelry, not to exceed 24′′ in 

width, 18′′ in depth, and 49′′ in height, including 

a minimum of 5 lined drawers lined with felt or 

felt-like material, at least one side door (whether or 

not the door is lined with felt or felt-like material), 

with necklace hangers, and a flip-top lid with inset 

mirror. See Issues and Decision Memorandum from 

Laurel LaCivita to Laurie Parkhill, Office Director, 

Concerning Jewelry Armoires and Cheval Mirrors in 

the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China, dated August 31, 2004. See also Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of 

China: Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation in Part, 71 

FR 38621 (July 7, 2006). 

12Cheval mirrors are any framed, tiltable mirror 

with a height in excess of 50′′ that is mounted on 

a floor-standing, hinged base. Additionally, the 

scope of the order excludes combination cheval 

mirror/jewelry cabinets. The excluded merchandise 

is an integrated piece consisting of a cheval mirror, 

i.e., a framed tiltable mirror with a height in excess 

of 50 inches, mounted on a floor-standing, hinged 

base, the cheval mirror serving as a door to a 

cabinet back that is integral to the structure of the 

mirror and which constitutes a jewelry cabinet 

lined with fabric, having necklace and bracelet 

hooks, mountings for rings and shelves, with or 

without a working lock and key to secure the 

contents of the jewelry cabinet back to the cheval 

mirror, and no drawers anywhere on the integrated 

piece. The fully assembled piece must be at least 

50 inches in height, 14.5 inches in width, and 3 

inches in depth. See Wooden Bedroom Furniture 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 

of Changed Circumstances Review and 

Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 72 FR 948 

(January 9, 2007). 

13Metal furniture parts and unfinished furniture 

parts made of wood products (as defined above) 

that are not otherwise specifically named in this 

scope (i.e., wooden headboards for beds, wooden 

footboards for beds, wooden side rails for beds, and 

wooden canopies for beds) and that do not possess 

the essential character of wooden bedroom 

furniture in an unassembled, incomplete, or 

unfinished form. Such parts are usually classified 

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheading 9403.90.7000. 

14Upholstered beds that are completely 

upholstered, i.e., containing filling material and 

completely covered in sewn genuine leather, 

synthetic leather, or natural or synthetic decorative 

fabric. To be excluded, the entire bed (headboards, 

footboards, and side rails) must be upholstered 

except for bed feet, which may be of wood, metal, 

or any other material and which are no more than 

nine inches in height from the floor. See Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review and Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 

72 FR 7013 (February 14, 2007). 

on-chests,1 highboys,2 lowboys,3 chests 

of drawers,4 chests,5 door chests,6

chiffoniers,7 hutches,8 and armoires; 9

(6) desks, computer stands, filing 

cabinets, book cases, or writing tables 

that are attached to or incorporated in 

the subject merchandise; and (7) other 

bedroom furniture consistent with the 

above list. 

The scope of the order excludes the 

following items: (1) Seats, chairs, 

benches, couches, sofas, sofa beds, 

stools, and other seating furniture; (2) 

mattresses, mattress supports (including 

box springs), infant cribs, water beds, 

and futon frames; (3) office furniture, 

such as desks, stand-up desks, computer 

cabinets, filing cabinets, credenzas, and 

bookcases; (4) dining room or kitchen 

furniture such as dining tables, chairs, 

servers, sideboards, buffets, corner 

cabinets, china cabinets, and china 

hutches; (5) other non-bedroom 

furniture, such as television cabinets, 

cocktail tables, end tables, occasional 

tables, wall systems, book cases, and 

entertainment systems; (6) bedroom 

furniture made primarily of wicker, 

cane, osier, bamboo or rattan; (7) side 

rails for beds made of metal if sold 

separately from the headboard and 

footboard; (8) bedroom furniture in 

which bentwood parts predominate; 10

(9) jewelry armories; 11 (10) cheval 

mirrors; 12 (11) certain metal parts; 13

(12) mirrors that do not attach to, 

incorporate in, sit on, or hang over a 

dresser if they are not designed and 

marketed to be sold in conjunction with 

a dresser as part of a dresser-mirror set; 

and (13) upholstered beds.14 Imports of 

subject merchandise are classified under 

subheading 9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS 

as ‘‘wooden * * * beds’’ and under 

subheading 9403.50.9080 of the HTSUS 

as ‘‘other * * * wooden furniture of a 

kind used in the bedroom.’’ In addition, 

wooden headboards for beds, wooden 

footboards for beds, wooden side rails 

for beds, and wooden canopies for beds 

may also be entered under subheading 

9403.50.9040 of the HTSUS as ‘‘parts of 

wood’’ and framed glass mirrors may 

also be entered under subheading 

7009.92.5000 of the HTSUS as ‘‘glass 

mirrors * * * framed.’’ This order 

covers all wooden bedroom furniture 

meeting the above description, 

regardless of tariff classification. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of this proceeding is dispositive. 

Verification 

As provided in section 782(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

we verified the information submitted 

by certain mandatory respondents. See 

Memoranda to the File, ‘‘Verification of 

the Factors Response of {the Dare 

Group}, in the Second Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order 

on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

PRC,’’ (July 10, 2008) (‘‘Dare Group 

Verification Report’’) and ‘‘Verification 

of the Factors Response of {Teamway} 

in the Second Administrative Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order on 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

PRC’’ (July 3, 2008) (‘‘Teamway 

Verification Report’’), on file in the 

CRU. For all verified companies, we 

used standard verification procedures, 

including examination of relevant 

accounting and production records, as 

well as original source documents 

provided by respondents. For further 

details on the verifications, see the Dare 

Group Verification Report and the 

Teamway Verification Report. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received, the Department has made 

certain changes in the margin 

calculations. For the final results, the 

Department has made the following 

changes with respect to surrogate 

financial ratios, surrogate values, the 

Dare Group and Teamway. 

General Issues 

Calculation of Surrogate Financial 

Ratios 

• After the Preliminary Results, the 

Dare Group’s importer, American 

Signature Inc., placed financial 

statements on the record for the 

following four Philippine companies: 

(1) Berbenwood Industries, Inc. 

(‘‘Berbenwood’’); (2) Antonio Bryan 

Development Corporation (‘‘Antonio 

Bryan’’); (3) Arkane International 

Corporation; and (4) Raphael Legacy 

Designs, Inc. For the final results, we 

included Antonio Bryan and 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
49164 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 

15See Teamway Verification Report at 2 (i.e., I. 

Minor Corrections 3.b). 

Berbenwood’s surrogate financial ratio 

calculations in the average financial 

ratios. See Memorandum to The File, 

‘‘Second Administrative Review of 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Factor 

Valuation Memorandum for the Final 

Results’’ (‘‘Final FOP Memo’’) and 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 10. 

• Calfurn Manufacturing Philippines, 

Inc. (‘‘Calfurn’’): (1) We treated 

Calfurn’s ‘‘gas and oil’’ as material, 

labor, and energy (‘‘ML&E’’) related to 

respondents’ reported factors of 

production (‘‘FOPs’’); and (2) we treated 

energy related to selling, general, and 

administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses as 

SG&A. See Final FOP Memo and Issues 

and Decision Memorandum at Comment 

11. 

• Insular Rattan & Native Products, 

Corporation (‘‘Insular Rattan’’): (1) We 

treated Insular Rattan’s ‘‘fuel used’’ as 

ML&E; and (2) we treated energy related 

to SG&A operations as SG&A expenses. 

See Final FOP Memo and Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 11. 

Recalculation of Surrogate Values 

• For the final results, the Department 

corrected certain unit conversion factors 

used to calculate surrogate values. 

• The Department calculated 

surrogate values for certain FOPs using 

Indian import statistics. 

• The Department recalculated the 

surrogate values for granite and 

leatheroid, excluding aberrational 

import data from the calculations. 

• The Department recalculated 

surrogate values for certain inputs 

where corrupted data was mistakenly 

used in the Preliminary Results. 

• The Department recalculated the 

surrogate financial ratios. 

See Final FOP Memo. 

Company-Specific Issues 

The Dare Group 

• The Dare Group reported market 

economy purchase (‘‘MEP’’) prices for 

paint, light, catches, poplar, and plastic. 

At the Department’s request, the Dare 

Group disaggregated these FOPs into 

more specific groupings. However, the 

Dare Group did not report the 

percentage of each of the disaggregated 

FOPs purchased from market economy 

(‘‘ME’’) countries in ME currencies. 

Therefore, as partial AFA, the 

Department is valuing the disaggregated 

MEP FOPs using surrogate values based 

on Indian or Philippine import 

statistics, as applicable. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 14 

and the Analysis Memorandum for the 

Final Results of Review: Fujian Lianfu 

Forestry Co., Ltd., Fuzhou Huan Mei 

Furniture Co. Ltd., and Jiangsu Dare 

Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Dare Group Final 

Calculation Memo’’). 

• The Department found at 

verification that the Dare Group underreported consumption of the FOP 

‘‘Plywood with Veneer.’’ As partial 

AFA, the Department is increasing the 

per-unit consumption rate of this FOP 

as described in the Dare Group Final 

Calculation Memo. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 16 

and the Dare Group Final Calculation 

Memo. 

• The Dare Group reported it 

purchased subject merchandise, semifinished furniture, from unaffiliated 

suppliers which it further processed and 

subsequently sold to the United States, 

but did not report the relevant FOPs 

which it further processed and sold to 

the United States during the POR. 

However, the Dare Group provided 

documents evidencing it attempted to 

obtain the FOP data from its suppliers 

but its suppliers did not provide the 

FOPS as requested. Therefore, as facts 

available, the Department is valuing 

semi-finished furniture as an FOP using 

Indian import statistics. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 12 

and the Dare Group Final Calculation 

Memo. 

• For the final results, the Department 

has treated the Dare Group’s reported 

per-unit ‘‘Woodscrap’’ as a by-product. 

See Issues and Decision Memorandum 

at Comment 20 and the Dare Group 

Final Calculation Memo. 

• The Department corrected certain 

clerical errors in the Dare Group’s 

surrogate value summary sheet with 

respect to notations in the source unit, 

currency, and final unit columns. See 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 21 and the Dare Group Final 

Calculation Memo. 

• We have excluded certain sales of 

non-subject merchandise from the Dare 

Group’s U.S. sales database. See Issues 

and Decision Memorandum at Comment 

15 and the Dare Group Final Calculation 

Memo. 

Teamway 

• For these final results, we applied 

AFA to steel screws, nut steel, steel bar, 

glue, direct labor, electricity, water, and 

fuel/oil/diesel from the May 5, 2008, 

FOP database for subcontractors for 

whom Teamway provided materials. 

See Issues and Decision Memorandum 

at Comment 26 and Analysis of the 

Final Results Margin Calculation for 

Teamway Furniture (Dong Guan) Ltd. 

and Brittomart Incorporated (‘‘Teamway 

Final Calculation Memo’’). 

• For these final results, we applied 

AFA to the veneers, glue, parquet tape, 

direct labor, electricity, water, and fuel/ 

oil/diesel from the May 5, 2008, FOP 

database for subcontractors for whom 

Teamway did not provide materials. See 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 26 and Teamway Final 

Calculation Memo. 

• For these final results, for bun feet, 

bent wood, and mirrors obtained from 

subcontractors for whom Teamway did 

not provide materials, we valued these 

inputs with surrogate values. See Issues 

and Decision Memorandum at Comment 

29 and Teamway Final Calculation 

Memo. 

• For the final margin calculation, we 

created a new integrated FOP database 

based upon the FOP databases 

submitted on May 5, 2008. This final 

integrated FOP database incorporates on 

the following: (1) The May 5, 2008, 

Teamway in-house FOP database; (2) 

the May 5, 2008, FOP database for 

subcontractors for whom Teamway 

provided materials, as adjusted for the 

application of partial AFA discussed 

above, and; (3) the May 5, 2008, FOP 

database for subcontractors for whom 

Teamway did not provide materials, as 

adjusted for: (A) The minor correction, 

which we accepted, to correct the 

reported water and electricity usage 

rates;15 and (B) the application of partial 

AFA discussed above. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 27 

and Teamway Final Calculation Memo. 

• As facts available, for these final 

results for the merchandise that was 

sold, but not produced, during the POR, 

we determined to use the FOPs from the 

final integrated FOP database (discussed 

immediately above) for the most similar 

control number (‘‘CONNUM’’) produced 

during the POR (as determined by the 

Department). See Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 28 and 

Teamway Final Calculation Memo. 

• For the final results, we reexamined 

a certain input purchased by Teamway, 

and found that the volume of this input 

from ME suppliers during the POR was 

below 33 percent of the company’s total 

volume of purchases of the input during 

the POR. Therefore, consistent with our 

practice, we weight-averaged the MEP 

price Teamway paid for the certain 

input with the appropriate surrogate 

value, according to its respective shares 

of the total volume of purchases, as 

appropriate. See Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 32 and 

Teamway Final Calculation Memo. 

• For the final results, we removed 

packing labor from the labor component 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 49165 

of COM, and included it only in the 

packing costs which we used to 

calculate normal value. See Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 31 

and Teamway Final Calculation Memo. 

• The U.S. sales database and the 

FOP databases, on which we based our 

integrated FOP database that we used 

for these final results, were placed on 

the record after the preliminary results. 

We found, and corrected errors in these 

databases which were not raised in the 

parties’ briefs. A full discussion of the 

additional corrections we made to the 

Teamway U.S. sales database and 

integrated FOP database we used for 

these final results can be found in the 

Teamway Final Calculation Memo. 

Surrogate Country 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that we had selected the Philippines as 

the appropriate surrogate country to use 

in this review for the following reasons: 

(1) It is a significant producer of 

comparable merchandise; (2) it is at a 

level of economic development 

comparable to that of the PRC; and (3) 

we have reliable data from the 

Philippines that we can use to value the 

FOPs. See Preliminary Results. For the 

final results, we received comments 

regarding our selection of a surrogate 

country. After reviewing those 

comments, we determined to make no 

changes to our findings with respect to 

the selection of a surrogate country. 

However, for certain inputs the 

Department determined to use India to 

value those inputs. See Comment 1 of 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

In proceedings involving non-market 

economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the 

Department begins with a rebuttable 

presumption that all companies within 

the country are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assigned a 

single antidumping duty deposit rate. It 

is the Department’s policy to assign all 

exporters of merchandise subject to an 

investigation in an NME country this 

single rate unless an exporter can 

demonstrate that it is sufficiently 

independent so as to be entitled to a 

separate rate. See Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers 

From the People’s Republic of China, 56 

FR 20588 (May 6, 1991), as amplified by 

Notice of Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide 

From the People’s Republic of China, 59 

FR 22585 (May 2, 1994), and 19 CFR 

351.107(d). 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that the Dare Group, Teamway, and 27 

Separate Rate Applicants demonstrated 

their eligibility for separate-rate status. 

For the final results, we continue to find 

that evidence placed on the record of 

this review only demonstrates that the 

Dare Group, Teamway, and 27 of the 

Separate Rate Applicants provided 

information that shows both a de jure 

and de facto absence of government 

control with respect to their respective 

exports of the merchandise under 

review, and, thus are eligible for 

separate-rate status. With respect to the 

new shipper, Mei Jia Ju, we stated in the 

Preliminary Results that we were 

granting a separate rate to Mei Jia Ju. 

However, because Mei Jia Ju failed to 

provide us with necessary information 

within the meaning of section 776(a) of 

the Act and failed to cooperate to the 

best of its ability within the meaning of 

section 776(b) of the Act we applied 

total adverse facts available to Mei Jia Ju 

and assigned them the PRC-wide rate of 

216.01 percent. No parties have 

commented on Mei Jia Ju’s rate and we 

continue to assigned Mei Jia Ju an AFA 

rate of 216.01 percent. 

Affiliation 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that the Dare Group entities (Fujian 

Lianfu Forestry Co. Ltd., Fujian Wonder 

Pacific Inc., Fuzhou Huan Mei Furniture 

Co., Ltd., and Jiangsu Dare Furniture 

Co., Ltd.) were affiliated pursuant to 

sections 771(33)(E) and (F) of the Act 

and that these companies should be 

treated as a single entity for the 

purposes of the administrative review of 

wooden bedroom furniture from the 

PRC. See Preliminary Results, 73 FR at 

8278. For the final results, we have 

made no changes to our findings with 

respect to the Dare Group’s affiliation. 

Adverse Facts Available 

Sections 776(a)(1) and (2) of the Act 

provide that the Department shall apply 

‘‘facts otherwise available’’ if necessary 

information is not on the record or an 

interested party or any other person (A) 

withholds information that has been 

requested, (B) fails to provide 

information within the deadlines 

established, or in the form and manner 

requested by the Department, subject to 

subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782, 

(C) significantly impedes a proceeding, 

or (D) provides information that cannot 

be verified as provided by section 782(i) 

of the Act. 

Where the Department determines 

that a response to a request for 

information does not comply with the 

request, section 782(d) of the Act 

provides that the Department will so 

inform the party submitting the 

response and will, to the extent 

practicable, provide that party the 

opportunity to remedy or explain the 

deficiency. If the party fails to remedy 

the deficiency within the applicable 

time limits and subject to section 782(e) 

of the Act, the Department may 

disregard all or part of the original and 

subsequent responses, as appropriate. 

Section 782(e) of the Act provides that 

the Department ‘‘shall not decline to 

consider information that is submitted 

by an interested party and is necessary 

to the determination but does not meet 

all applicable requirements established 

by the administering authority’’ if the 

information is timely, can be verified, is 

not so incomplete that it cannot be used, 

and if the interested party acted to the 

best of its ability in providing the 

information. Where all of these 

conditions are met, the statute requires 

the Department to use the information if 

it can do so without undue difficulties. 

Section 776(b) of the Act further 

provides that the Department may use 

an adverse inference in applying the 

facts otherwise available when a party 

has failed to cooperate by not acting to 

the best of its ability to comply with a 

request for information. Section 776(b) 

of the Act also authorizes the 

Department to use as AFA information 

derived from the petition, the final 

determination, a previous 

administrative review, or other 

information placed on the record. 

Starcorp 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that because Starcorp 

ceased participating in this 

administrative review, and requested 

that the Department and all parties 

destroy or return its submissions 

containing business proprietary 

information, none of Starcorp’s 

information could be verified. As a 

result, Starcorp did not demonstrate its 

entitlement to a separate rate and was, 

therefore, subject to the PRC-wide rate. 

See Preliminary Results, 73 FR at 8282. 

For the final results, we made no 

changes to our findings with respect to 

Starcorp. 

The PRC-Wide Rate 

Because we begin with the 

presumption that all companies within 

an NME country are subject to 

government control and because only 

the companies listed under the ‘‘Final 

Results Margins’’ section, below, have 

overcome that presumption, we are 

applying a single antidumping rate (i.e., 

the PRC-wide rate) to all other exporters 

of subject merchandise from the PRC. 

These other companies did not 

demonstrate entitlement to a separate 

rate. See, e.g., Synthetic Indigo From the 

People’s Republic of China; Notice of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
49166 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 

Than Fair Value, 65 FR 25706, 25707 

(May 3, 2000). The PRC-wide rate 

applies to all entries of subject 

merchandise except for entries from the 

respondents that are listed in the ‘‘Final 

Results Margins’’ section, below. 

The Department based the margin for 

the PRC-wide entity on AFA. See 

Preliminary Results, 73 FR at 8282. 

Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, 

the Department found that because the 

PRC-wide entity failed to respond to the 

Department’s questionnaires, withheld 

or failed to provide information in a 

timely manner or in the form or manner 

requested by the Department, submitted 

information that could not be verified, 

or otherwise impeded the process, it 

was appropriate to apply a dumping 

margin for the PRC-wide entity using 

facts otherwise available on the record. 

The Department further determined that 

an adverse inference was appropriate 

because the PRC-wide entity failed to 

respond to requests for information and 

therefore failed to cooperate by not 

acting to the best of its ability. With 

respect to AFA, we are applying the 

highest calculated rate from the history 

of this proceeding: a calculated 

company-specific rate in a new shipper 

review of wooden bedroom furniture 

from the PRC. See Wooden Bedroom 

Furniture from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of the 2004–2005 

Semi-Annual New Shipper Reviews, 71 

FR 70739 (December 6, 2006) (‘‘Final 

04–05 New Shipper Reviews’’). 

Corroboration 

Section 776(c) of the Act provides 

that, when the Department relies on 

secondary information rather than on 

information obtained in the course of an 

investigation or review, it shall, to the 

extent practicable, corroborate that 

information from independent sources 

that are reasonably at its disposal. 

Secondary information is defined as 

information derived from the petition 

that gave rise to the investigation or 

review, the final determination 

concerning the subject merchandise, or 

any previous review under section 751 

of the Act concerning the subject 

merchandise. See Statement of 

Administrative Action accompanying 

the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 

H.R. Doc. No. 103–316, Vol. 1 (1994) 

(‘‘SAA’’), at 870. Corroborate means that 

the Department will satisfy itself that 

the secondary information to be used 

has probative value. Id. To corroborate 

secondary information, the Department 

will, to the extent practicable, examine 

the reliability and relevance of the 

information to be used. See Tapered 

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished From Japan, 

and Tapered Roller Bearings, Four 

Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, and 

Components Thereof, From Japan; 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Partial Termination of Administrative 

Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 (November 

6, 1996) (unchanged in the final results). 

Independent sources used to corroborate 

such evidence may include, for 

example, published price lists, official 

import statistics and customs data, and 

information obtained from interested 

parties during the particular 

investigation. See SAA at 870; Notice of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value: Live Swine From 

Canada, 70 FR 12181, 12183 (March 11, 

2005); Notice of Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: High and Ultra-High Voltage 

Ceramic Station Post Insulators from 

Japan, 68 FR 35627, 35628–35629 (June 

16, 2003) (unchanged in final 

determination). 

The AFA rate that the Department is 

now using was determined in a 

previously published final results of 

new shipper review. See Final 04–05 

New Shipper Reviews. In that new 

shipper review, the Department 

calculated a company-specific rate, 

which was above the PRC-wide rate 

established in the investigation. Because 

this rate is a company-specific 

calculated rate concerning subject 

merchandise, we have determined this 

rate to be reliable. 

With respect to the relevance aspect 

of corroboration, the Department will 

consider information reasonably at its 

disposal to determine whether a margin 

continues to have relevance. Where 

circumstances indicate that the selected 

margin is not appropriate as AFA, the 

Department will disregard the margin 

and determine an appropriate margin. 

See Fresh Cut Flowers From Mexico; 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 61 FR 6812, 

6814 (February 22, 1996) (the 

Department disregarded the highest 

margin in that case as adverse best 

information available (the predecessor 

to facts available) because the margin 

was based on another company’s 

uncharacteristic business expense 

resulting in an unusually high margin). 

Similarly, the Department does not 

apply a margin that has been 

discredited. See D&L Supply Co. v. 

United States, 113 F.3d 1220, 1221 (Fed. 

Cir. 1997) (ruling that the Department 

will not use a margin that has been 

judicially invalidated). To assess the 

relevancy of the rate used, the 

Department compared that rate to the 

margin calculations of the mandatory 

respondents in the current 

administrative and new shipper 

reviews. The Department found that the 

margin of 216.01 percent was within the 

range of the highest margins calculated 

on the record of this administrative 

review. Because the record of this 

administrative review contains margins 

within the range of 216.01 percent, we 

determine that the rate from the Final 

04–05 New Shipper Reviews continues 

to be relevant for use as AFA in the 

current administrative and new shipper 

reviews. 

As the adverse margin is both reliable 

and relevant, we determine that it has 

probative value. Accordingly, we 

determine that this rate meets the 

corroboration criterion established in 

section 776(c) of the Act, that secondary 

information have probative value. As a 

result, the Department determines that 

the margin is corroborated for the 

purposes of these administrative 

reviews and may reasonably be applied 

to Mei Jia Ju, and the PRC-wide entity 

as AFA. 

Final Results Margins 

We determine that the following 

weighted-average percentage margins 

exist for the POR: 

WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE FROM THE PRC 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd., aka Fujian Wonder Pacific Inc. (Dare Group) ................................................................. 17.93 

Fuzhou Huan Mei Furniture Co., Ltd. (Dare Group) ........................................................................................................... 17.93 

Jiangsu Dare Furniture Co., Ltd. (Dare Group) .................................................................................................................. 17.93 

Teamway Furniture (Dong Guan) Co. Ltd., Brittomart Inc .................................................................................................. 19.93 

BNBM Co., Ltd. (aka Beijing New Material Co., Ltd) .......................................................................................................... 18.82 

Classic Furniture Global Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................ 18.82 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 49167 

WOODEN BEDROOM FURNITURE FROM THE PRC—Continued 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

Dalian Guangming Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 18.82 

Decca Furniture Ltd., aka Decca ......................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Dong Guan Golden Fortune Houseware Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... 18.82 

Dongguan Mingsheng Furniture Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................ 18.82 

Dongguan Yihaiwei Furniture Limited ................................................................................................................................. 18.82 

Fortune Furniture Ltd. and its affiliate, Dongguan Fortune Furniture Ltd ........................................................................... 18.82 

Gaomi Yatai Wooden Ware Co., Ltd., Team Prospect International Ltd., Money Gain International Co .......................... 18.82

Guangming Group Wumahe Furniture Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................. 18.82 

Inni Furniture ........................................................................................................................................................................ 18.82 

Mei Jia Ju Furniture Industrial (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd ............................................................................................................ 216.01 

Meikangchi (Nantong) Furniture Company Ltd ................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Nanjing Nanmu Furniture Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Po Ying Industrial Co ........................................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Qingdao Beiyuan-Shengli Furniture Co., Ltd., Qingdao Beiyuan Industry Trading Co. Ltd ............................................... 18.82 

Shenzhen Tiancheng Furniture Co., Ltd., Winbuild Industrial Ltd., Red Apple Furniture Co., Ltd. and Red Apple Trading Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Shenyang Kunyu Wood Industry Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Shenzhen Xingli Furniture Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Tianjin First Wood Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................. 18.82 

Union Friend International Trade Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Winmost Enterprises Limited ............................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Winny Overseas, Ltd ........................................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Yangchen Hengli Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

Yichun Guangming Furniture Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................. 18.82 

Zhong Cheng Furniture Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 18.82 

PRC-Wide Rate ................................................................................................................................................................... 216.01 

Assessment Rates 

The Department will determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries. For 

customers/importers of the respondents 

that did not report entered value, we 

have calculated customer/importerspecific antidumping duty assessment 

amounts based on the ratio of the total 

amount of antidumping duties 

calculated for the examined sales of 

subject merchandise to the total 

quantity of subject merchandise sold in 

those transactions. For customers/ 

importers of the respondents that 

reported entered value, we have 

calculated customer-specific 

antidumping duty assessment amounts 

based on customer/importer-specific ad 

valorem rates in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). For the companies 

receiving a separate rate that were not 

selected for individual review (i.e., 

separate rate companies), we have 

calculated an assessment rate based on 

the weighted average of the cash deposit 

rates calculated for the companies 

selected for individual review excluding 

any that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on AFA, pursuant to section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

administrative and new shipper 

reviews. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results of this 

administrative review and new shipper 

review for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For the exporters listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rates shown for 

those companies; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate of 216.01 percent; and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporters that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. These deposit requirements 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification of Interested Parties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APOs’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
49168 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 

Dated: August 11, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix II 

Cross-Cutting Issues 

Comment 1: Surrogate Country 

A. Economic Comparability 

B. Significant Producer 

C. Financial Statements 

D. Data Considerations 

Comment 2: Combination Rates 

Comment 3: New NME Wage Rate 

Comment 4: Zeroing 

I. Surrogate Values 

Comment 5: Wrong Standard for Accepting 

Respondents Proposed HTS 

Classifications 

Comment 6: Indian Surrogate Values 

Information Has Been Provided for 

Teamway and the Dare Group 

A. Effective Date 

B. India & South Korea 

C. Inherent Error in Calculation 

Comment 7: Brokerage And Handling, Diesel 

Fuel, Water, Electricity, and Freight 

Comment 8: Accurate Conversion Factors for 

Lumber and Board 

Comment 9: Accurate Average Unit Values 

Comment 10: Philippine Financial 

Statements 

Comment 11: Treatment of Certain Expense 

Items in the Financial Ratios 

III. Dare Group 

Comment 12: Whether to Apply Partial AFA 

to the Dare Group’s Purchases of SemiFinished Furniture from Unaffiliated 

Suppliers 

Comment 13: Incorrect Allocation for 

Indirect Materials, Labor, Energy, Water, 

and Scrap 

Comment 14: Use of Disaggregated Factors of 

Production and Correct Market Economy 

Purchase Prices 

Comment 15: Exclude Certain Piece Types 

Comment 16: Adjust Direct Materials for 

Unreported Consumption 

Comment 17: Modify Assessment Rate 

Calculation 

Comment 18: Conversion Rate for SemiFinished Furniture Inputs 

Comment 19: Raw Material Converters for 

Plywood 

Comment 20: Woodscrap By-Product 

Comment 21: Clerical Errors 

Comment 22: Corruption of Certain WTA 

Philippines Import Data 

Comment 23: Eliminate Aberrational Values 

Comment 24: Change Certain Philippine HTS 

Categories in Valuing The Dare Group’s 

Inputs 

Comment 25: Use Most Updated Datasets 

IV. Teamway 

Comment 26: Whether to Apply Total AFA 

to Teamway 

Comment 27: Whether and How to Combine 

the FOP Datasets from May 5, 2008 and 

May 16, 2008 

Comment 28: Whether to Apply an Adverse 

Inference to Value Merchandise Sold, 

but not Produced, During the POR 

Comment 29: Valuation of Certain 

Subcontracted Factors 

Comment 30: Bun Feet Variance 

Comment 31: Packing Labor 

Comment 32: Use Market Economy 

Purchases for Certain Inputs 

V. Starcorp 

Comment 33: Assign Total AFA 

[FR Doc. E8–19303 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–839] 

Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Antidumping Duty 

Review: Certain Polyester Staple Fiber 

from the Republic of Korea 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has determined, 

pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

that Woongjin Chemical Co. Ltd. 

(‘‘Woongjin’’) is the successor–ininterest to Saehan Industries Inc. 

(‘‘Saehan’’). As a result, Woongjin will 

be accorded the same treatment 

previously accorded to Saehan with 

regard to the antidumping duty order on 

polyester staple fiber (‘‘PSF’’) from the 

Republic of Korea (‘‘Korea’’) as of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Devta Ohri, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

1, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3853. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 25, 2000, the Department of 

Commerce issued an antidumping duty 

order on certain PSF from Korea. See 

Notice of Amended Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain 

Polyester Staple Fiber from Republic of 

Korea, 65 FR 33807 (May 25, 2000). On 

April 23, 2008, Woongjin requested that 

the Department initiate a changed 

circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty order on PSF from 

Korea to determine that, for purposes of 

the antidumping law, Woongjin is the 

successor–in-interest to Saehan. On 

June 16, 2008, the Department initiated 

this review and made its preliminary 

finding that Woongjin is the successor–

in-interest to Saehan, and should be 

treated as such for antidumping duty 

cash deposit purposes. See Notice of 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Antidumping 

Duty Review: Certain Polyester Staple 

Fiber From the Republic of Korea, 73 FR 

33989 (June 16, 2008). We invited 

parties to comment on the preliminary 

results. We received no comments or 

requests for a hearing. 

Scope of the Review 

For the purposes of this order, the 

product covered is PSF. PSF is defined 

as synthetic staple fibers, not carded, 

combed or otherwise processed for 

spinning, of polyesters measuring 3.3 

decitex (3 denier, inclusive) or more in 

diameter. This merchandise is cut to 

lengths varying from one inch (25 mm) 

to five inches (127 mm). The 

merchandise subject to this order may 

be coated, usually with a silicon or 

other finish, or not coated. PSF is 

generally used as stuffing in sleeping 

bags, mattresses, ski jackets, comforters, 

cushions, pillows, and furniture. 

Merchandise of less than 3.3 decitex 

(less than 3 denier) currently classifiable 

in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) at 

subheading 5503.20.00.25 is specifically 

excluded from this order. Also 

specifically excluded from this order are 

polyester staple fibers of 10 to 18 denier 

that are cut to lengths of 6 to 8 inches 

(fibers used in the manufacture of 

carpeting). In addition, low–melt PSF is 

excluded from this order. Low–melt PSF 

is defined as a bi–component fiber with 

an outer sheath that melts at a 

significantly lower temperature than its 

inner core. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is currently classifiable in the HTSUS at 

subheadings 5503.20.00.45 and 

5503.20.00.65. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under the order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the reasons stated in the 

preliminary results, and because the 

Department did not receive any 

comments following the preliminary 

results of this review, the Department 

continues to find that Woongjin is the 

successor–in-interest to Saehan for 

antidumping duty cash deposit 

purposes. 

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

suspend liquidation of all shipments of 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES