alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 850 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 850

       To ratify the States' right to limit congressional terms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1995

 Mrs. Fowler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To ratify the States' right to limit congressional terms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RATIFICATION OF STATES' RIGHTS.

    Each State may prescribe the number of terms a person may be 
elected or appointed to the Senate or House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re Senate Resolution Relating to Constitutionality of Proposed Re-apportionment Bill.

The matter was submitted by a preamble and resolution from tbe senate, as follows: “Whereas, section 45, article 5, of the constitution of the state of Colorado provides as follows: ‘Sec. 45. The general assembly shall provide by law for an enumeration of the inhabitants of the state in the year of our Lord 1885, and every tenth year thereafter; and at the session next following such enumeration, and at the session next following an enumeration made by the authority of the United States, shall revise and adjust the apportionment for senators and representatives on the basis of such enumeration, according to ratios to be fixed by law;’ and whereas, the last enumeration of the inhabitants of the state of Colorado was made .in the year 1885; and whereas, at the session of the general assembly of the state next following such enumeration, to wit, at the session of the sixth general assembly convened and held in the year 1887, a bill was introduced revising and adjusting the apportionment for senators and representatives on the basis of such enumeration, according to the ratios therein fixed; and whereas, said bill passed both houses of the said general assembly, but failed to receive the approval of the governor, and by reason thereof did not become a law; and whereas, at this session of the general assembly, being the second session following such last enumeration of the inhabitants of the state, a bill has been introduced into the senate fixing the ratios of representation, and revising and adjusting the apportionment of senators and representatives on the basis of such enumeration of the inhabitants of the state made in the year 1885; and whereas, grave doubts exist as to the constitutionality of such a law, if enacted at this session of the general assembly: therefore, be it resolved by the senate of the seventh general assembly of the state of Colorado *188that the supreme court be requested to give its opinion as to whether or not the general assembly can at this session, in accordance with the provisions of the constitution, pass a bill revising and adjusting the apportionment of senators and representatives on the basis of the enumeration of the inhabitants of the state made in the year 1885.”

Per Ouriam.

This is, in substance, the same question recently presented by the house of representatives, and, as in that case, we answer in the affirmative.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6035 

To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 to extend the 

authorization of financial assistance with respect to the Abraham Lincoln 

National Heritage Area. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. LAHOOD (for himself, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, Mrs. BUSTOS, Mr. 

CASTEN, Mr. BOST, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. KELLY of 

Illinois, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. RUSH, and Mr. KINZINGER) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2008 

to extend the authorization of financial assistance with 

respect to the Abraham Lincoln National Heritage Area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Abraham Lincoln Na5 tional Heritage Area Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ABRAHAM LINCOLN NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA. 

7 Section 451 of the Consolidated Natural Resources 

8 Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–229) is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6035 IH

1 ‘‘the date that is 15 years after the date of the enactment 

2 of this subtitle’’ and inserting ‘‘May 8, 2038’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, A. Clay Leighton, certify that:



|1. |  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sonic Solutions; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 29, 2005



By:

/s/    A. Clay
LeightonA. Clay Leighton Senior Vice President of Worldwide Operations and Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of WNS
(Holdings) Limited (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2016 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2016



|       |  |                              
|------ |  | -----------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Keshav R. Murugesh       
|Name:  |  | Keshav R. Murugesh           
|Title: |  | Group Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is
not being filed either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and is not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of
Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    March 30, 2011
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00180-CR

STEVEN BLANCHARD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1409007D

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Steven Blanchard appeals from a judgment convicting him of 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and sentencing him to fifteen years’ 

confinement.

Blanchard’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to 

withdraw and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel avers that in his

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

professional opinion, the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the 

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of 

the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See

386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

In compliance with Kelly v. State, counsel notified Blanchard of his motion 

to withdraw, provided him a copy of the motion and brief, informed him of his 

right to file a pro se response, informed him of his right to seek discretionary 

review should this court hold the appeal is frivolous, and took concrete measures 

to facilitate Blanchard’s review of the appellate record. See 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014). This court informed Blanchard that he could file a pro se

response, and he did so. The State did not submit a brief.

Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on 

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this 

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 

904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may 

we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–

83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and Blanchard’s 

response. We agree with counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without 

merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See 

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also 
3

Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we 

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/s/ Bill Meier

BILL MEIER

JUSTICE

PANEL: MEIER, KERR, and PITTMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 23, 2017
#### Frank Griffin, Respondent, v. William McMahon, Personally and as Administrator, etc., of Teresa McMahon, Deceased, and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Martha A. Mallory, Appellant.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred; Robson, J., not sitting.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**P&FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Richard A. Horowitz    |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Horowitz         |
| Principal Executive Officer |
| August 12, 2005             |

 

1

----
#### In the Matter of Frank M. Hardenbrook.

Motion denied. Settle order on notice.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**P&FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&FIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                  | /s/  JOSEPH A. MOLINO, JR.    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Joseph  A. Molino, Jr.        |
| Date  August 13, 2010 | *Principal Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 21.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                Name of Subsidiary                        Jurisdiction          Percentage Ownership
-------------------------------------------------    ---------------------     ---------------------
<S>                                                                                   <C>
        Armour of America, Incorporated                   California                  100.0%
          Arocon Security Corporation                      Delaware                   100.0%
          Electric Fuel (E.F.L.) Ltd.                       Israel                    100.0%
       Electric Fuel Battery Corporation                   Delaware                   100.0%
       Electric Fuel Transportation Corp.                  Delaware                   100.0%
      Epsilor Electronic Industries, Ltd.                   Israel                    100.0%
               FAAC Incorporated                           Michigan                   100.0%
                  FAAC Limited                           United Kingdom               100.0%
         IES Interactive Training, Inc.                    Delaware                   100.0%
             MDT Armor Corporation                          Israel                     88.0%
        MDT Protective Industries, Ltd.                     Israel                     75.5%

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATION

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

# As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark A. Little, certify that this
annual report on Form 10-K of Remington Arms Company, Inc. fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: March 23, 2005

/s/ Mark A. LittleMark A. LittleExecutive Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, and Chief Administrative Officer
#### McCAIN v. PAN-AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION et al.

No. 4312.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 6, 1933.

For former opinion, see 142 So. 376.

Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellants.

G. H. McCain, of Colfax, and Harry Fuller, of Winnfield, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The rehearing in this case was granted without restriction. However, the court did so largely because the evidence given by defendant’s medical expert witnesses was inadvertently omitted from the record by the clerk in preparing it for this court. The omitted evidence bore upon the question of the extent and duration of plaintiff’s injuries and their possible effect upon his ability in the future to do the work in which he had been engaged prior to being injured. By agreement of counsel, the record has been supplemented by the omitted testimony in the form of a letter signed by the physicians, which, it was agreed, should be considered by the court in lieu of their evidence under oath.

All phases of the ease have again been earn*332estly argued and briefed by defendants’ learned counsel, and we have again considered and studied this voluminous record out of a desire to correct any errors in our judgment, if any could be discovered. The testimony of all the witnesses, and there are many, has again been read in connection with the forceful, though critical, brief of defendants’ counsel on rehearing, and we turn from our labor feeling that, as far as is humanly possible, this ease has been given due consideration, and that our former judgment is correct,

For the reasons assigned herein, the judgment heretofore rendered by us is reinstated and made the final decree of this court.
#### Florence Sullivan, an Infant, by Daniel J. Sullivan, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Richmond Light and Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
#### Michael Farrell and Margaret Farrell, Respondents, v. Nora T. Berkery, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6136 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6136

  To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from 
 Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2021

   Ms. Salazar (for herself, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. Gimenez, Mr. 
   Jones, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Crawford, Mrs. Murphy of Florida, Mr. 
  Murphy of North Carolina, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Rutherford, and Mr. 
   Gohmert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend duty-free treatment provided with respect to imports from 
 Haiti under the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Haiti Economic Lift Program 
Extension Act of 2021'' or the ``HELP Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL RULES FOR HAITI UNDER CARIBBEAN BASIN 
              ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT.

    Section 213A of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 
U.S.C. 2703a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B)(v)(I)--
                            (i) by striking ``means'' and all that 
                        follows through ``60 percent'' and inserting 
                        ``means 60 percent''; and
                            (ii) by striking ``7 succeeding 1-year 
                        periods'' and inserting ``17 succeeding 1-year 
                        periods''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C)--
                            (i) in the table, by striking ``16 
                        succeeding 1-year periods'' and inserting ``28 
                        succeeding 1-year periods''; and
                            (ii) in the matter following the table, by 
                        striking ``2025'' and inserting ``2035''; and
            (2) in subsection (h), by striking ``2025'' and inserting 
        ``2035''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 18



Board of Directors
Oshman's Sporting Goods, Inc.


As stated in Note B to the consolidated financial statements of Oshman's
Sporting Goods, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") for the period ended April
29, 2000, the Company changed its accounting policy for valuing inventory from
the retail method to the average cost method. Management believes the newly
adopted accounting principle is a preferable method for matching the cost of
merchandise  with  the revenues  generated. At your request, we have reviewed
and discussed with management the circumstances, business judgment, and planning
that formed the basis for making this change in accounting principle.

It should be recognized that professional standards have not been established
for selecting among alternative principles that exist in this area or for
evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting principles. Accordingly,
we are furnishing this letter solely for purposes of the Company's compliance
with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and it should
not be used or relied on for any other purpose.

Based on our review and discussion, we concur with management's judgment that
the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances. In
formulating this position, we are relying on management's business planning and
judgment, which we do not find unreasonable.

We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Oshman's Sporting
Goods, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of any date or for any period subsequent to
January 29, 2000.  Accordingly, we are unable to express an opinion on whether
the method of accounting for the effect of the change is in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles or if the financial information
included in Part I of this Form 10-Q is fairly presented.

Very truly yours,


GRANT THORNTON LLP
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 1661 Lower Tribunal No. 2016

- CF

- 009592

- A

- O

_____________________________ K EYRON C URRY , Appellant ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Renee A. Roche , Judge.
May 21, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

. WOZNIAK, WHITE and MIZE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig , II, Public Defender, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<PAGE>










                                EXHIBIT (15)(a)
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT (15)(a)



November 12, 2001


CMS Energy Corporation:

     We are aware that CMS Energy Corporation has incorporated by reference in
its Registration Statements No. 33-55805, No. 33-60007, No. 333-27849, No.
333-32229, No. 333-37241, No. 333-45556, No. 333-47464, No. 333-51932, No.
333-52560, and No. 333-58686 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2001, which includes our report dated October 31, 2001 covering the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



Very truly yours,



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
-----------------------