alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6080]


Announcement of Meetings of the International Telecommunication 
Advisory Committee

    Summary: This notice announces meetings of the International 
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) to prepare advice on U.S. 
positions for the March/April 2008 meeting of the International 
Telecommunication Union Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-
T) Study Group 3 (Tariff and accounting principles including related 
telecommunication economic and policy issues) and the April 2008 
meeting of the Organization of American States Inter-American 
Telecommunication Commission Permanent Consultative Committee I 
(Telecommunication) (OAS/CITEL/PCC.I).
    The ITAC will meet to prepare advice for the U.S. on positions for 
the March/April 2008 meeting of the ITU-T Study Group 3 and related 
issues of the International Telecommunication Regulations on Tuesday 
afternoons February 19, March 4, 11, and 18, 2008 2-4PM EST in the 
Washington, DC metro area. Meeting details and detailed agendas will be 
posted on the mailing list <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c7f6b6d4c696e60657f78227f786d7869226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="15667274557077797c66613b66617461703b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>. People desiring to 
participate on this list may apply to the secretariat at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bbd6d2d5dac9dfd1defbc8cfdacfde95dcd4cd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee8387808f9c8a848bae9d9a8f9a8bc0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The ITAC will meet to prepare advice for the U.S. on positions for 
the April 2008 meeting of the OAS CITEL PCC.I on Thursday February 21, 
2008 10AM--noon EST at a location in the Washington, DC metro area. We 
expect this meeting to be continued as necessary. Meeting details and 
detailed agenda will be posted on the mailing list <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#047467672a6d29676d706168446166686d77702a77706570612a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95e5f6f6bbfcb8f6fce1f0f9d5f0f7f9fce6e1bbe6e1f4e1f0bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>. People desiring to participate on this list may 
apply to the secretariat at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14797d7a7566707e715467607560713a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="432e2a2d22312729260330372237266d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The meetings are open to the public.

    Dated: January 28, 2008.
Marian R. Gordon,
International Communications & Information Policy, Department of State.
 [FR Doc. E8-1950 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
WAY COOL IMPORTS, INC.


 


STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT


 


__________ ___, ____


 


Dear ___________:


 


This Stock Option Award Agreement (“Award Agreement”)
sets forth the terms of the Stock Option Award made to you by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Way Cool
Imports, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended from time to
time, the “Plan”). All defined terms used in this Award Agreement without definition have the meanings set forth in
the Plan. Unless varied in this Award Agreement, the terms applicable to Options set forth in the Plan shall apply to this Option.


 


	Awarded To:	 
	 	 
	Grant Date:	 
	 	 
	Vesting Commencement Date:	 
	 	 
	Participant Status:	[employee] [non-employee director]
	 	 
	Exercise Price:	$
	 	 
	Number of Shares subject to Award:	 
	 	 
	Type of Stock Option:	[Incentive Stock Option] [Non-qualified Stock Option]
	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:	 
	 	 
	Term of Stock Option Award:	 


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


	Rights as Stockholder:	The shares of Common Stock underlying this Award are not issued and outstanding, and, therefore, you have no right to vote the shares awarded, or to receive dividends, if any, approved from time to time by the Board, until this Award is exercised by you.
	 	 
	Additional Provisions applicable to Award:	 


 


Change of Control Causes Accelerated Vesting. [Pursuant
to Section 11.1 of the Plan, all awards under this Award Agreement shall become fully vested upon a Change of Control (as defined
in the Plan). –OR– Pursuant to Section 11.1 of the Plan, all awards under this Award Agreement shall become
fully vested upon the occurrence of your involuntary termination of employment by the Company and all Subsidiaries without Cause
during the 12-month period following a Change of Control (as each is defined in the Plan).]


 


You understand and agree that the Option represented by this
Award Agreement is subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan and you agree to be bound by the terms of the Plan.
In the event a conflict between this Award Agreement and the terms of the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall prevail. You hereby
acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Plan. [As a condition precedent to the accrual of your rights under the Plan and the Option
represented by this Award Agreement, you shall execute and deliver to the Company the Proprietary Information and Assignment Agreement
in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. You acknowledge and agree that your receipt of the rights under the Plan and the Option
represented by this Award Agreement constitute good and valuable consideration for your execution and delivery of such Proprietary
Information and Assignment Agreement.]


 


This Award Agreement is issued by the Company, acting through
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company as of the Grant Date set forth above.


 


Way Cool Imports, Inc.


 


	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:	 	 


 




    	2
EX-4.16





 Exhibit 4.16 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES 

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

Trex Company, Inc. has two classes of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”): (1) our Common Stock; (2) our Preferred Stock. 
 Description of Common Stock 

The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in
its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.16 is a part. We encourage you to read our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws for additional information. 

Authorized Capital Shares 
 Our authorized
capital shares consist of 120,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), and 3,000,000 shares of series preferred stock, $0.01 par value per preferred share (“Preferred Stock”). The outstanding
shares of our Common Stock are fully paid and nonassessable. 
 Voting Rights 

Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the stockholders, including the election of directors.
Our Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights. 
 Dividend Rights 

Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive
dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. 

Liquidation Rights 
 Subject to any
preferential rights of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock will share ratably in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution. 

Other Rights and Preferences 
 Our Common
Stock has no sinking fund or redemption provisions or preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. Holders of Common Stock may act by unanimous written consent. 

Listing 
 The Common Stock is traded on
the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “TREX.” 
 DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED STOCK 

The Board of Directors is authorized without further stockholder action to provide for the issuance from time to time of up to 3,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock in one or more series with such powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other rights, qualifications, limitations or restrictions as will be set forth in the resolutions providing for the issuance of such
series adopted by the Board of Directors. The holders of Preferred Stock have no preemptive rights (unless otherwise provided in the applicable certificate of designation) and are not subject to future assessments by the Company. Such Preferred
Stock may have voting or other rights which could adversely affect the rights of holders of the Common Stock.
#### LOVOI v. R. F. MESTAYER LUMBER CO., Inc., et al.

No. 16780.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Feb. 6, 1939.

*102For former opinion, see 185 So. 473.

Alwyn J. Justrabo, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Porteous, Johnson & Humphrey, of New Orleans, for appellees R. F. Mestayer Lumber Co. and Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York. ■

Gordon Boswell, of New Orleans, for appellee Standard Ins. Co.

John May, of New Orleans, for appellee Travelers Ins. Co.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for Standard Surety & Casualty Company of New York — called in warranty by R. F. Mestayer Lumber Company, Inc. — who are also counsel for the latter company, direct our attention to the fact that, when judgment was rendered in the district court in favor of the Mestayer Lumber Company dismissing the suit of plaintiff, and plaintiff appealed from that judgment, the Mestayer Lumber Company did not appeal from that part of the judgment which dismissed its call in warranty.

In application for rehearing they, therefore, complain of the fact that, after rendering decree in favor of plaintiff and against Mestayer Lumber Company, we rendered a decree in favor of the Mestayer Lumber Company and against Standard Surety & Casualty Company as warrantor.

Since there was no appeal as ■'■ainst the warrantor, the decree should not have been rendered against that company. We were misled by the fact that counsel who represented the Lumber Company also represented the insurer of the Lumber Company and appeared on the brief and argued the case on behalf of both of the said parties.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decree heretofore rendered by us be and it is amended insofar as it runs against Standard Surety & Casualty Company of New York in warranty.

The application for rehearing is. refused.

Rehearing refused.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1945]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-302]


Florida Power Corporation, et al.; Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed No 
Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a 
Hearing; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Issuance; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on January 15, 2008 (73 FR 2553), which informed the public 
that the NRC issued Amendment No. 228 to Facility Operating License No. 
DPR-72 for Crystal River Unit No. 3 Nuclear Generating Plant. This 
action is necessary to correct the date of issuance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stewart N. Bailey, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001; telephone (301) 415-1321, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0938e8280aeb2a3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="782b363a38160a1b561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 2554, appearing near the top of the 
first column, after Date of Issuance: the date is corrected to read 
December 26, 2007.

    Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of January 2008.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Stewart N. Bailey,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
 [FR Doc. E8-1945 Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Fourth Department,

February, 1909.

#### Phillip A. Williams, Jr., and Walter G. Morse, Respondents, v. Helen M. Gridley, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Williams, J., who dissented.
EXHIBIT 35.3

   Servicer Compliance Statement for Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as
                                    Servicer

Countrywide Home Loans
400 Countrywide Way
Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

March 5, 2007

CHASE
6525 W CAMPUS OVAL 200
NEW ALBANY, OH 43054

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph  Candelario,  hereby certify that I am the First Vice President,  Loan
Administration  of  Countrywide  Home  Loans,  Inc.,  fka  Countrywide   Funding
Corporation.  I further  certify,  with respect to the Servicing  Agreements for
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations, Inc., the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the fiscal
year  ended  December  31,  2006  under the  Agreements  and,  to the best of my
knowledge,  based on my review,  the Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the fiscal year.


By: /s/ Joseph Candelario                       March 5, 2007
    ----------------------                      Date
    Joseph Candelario
    First Vice President
    Compliance Officer
    Loan Administration


                                    Exhibit A
                          Securitization Transaction(s)
                         ------------------------------
                               GSAA 2006-1 (SUB)
                               GSAA 2006-12
                               GSAA 2006-3 (SUB)
                               GSAA 2006-5
                               GSAA 2006-5 (SUB)
                               GSAA 2006-6 SUB
                               GSAA 2006-9 (SUB)
                               GSAA 2006-3
                               GSAA 2006-9
                               GSR 2006-4F (SUB)
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Atlas America Public #15-2006 (B) L.P. (the
"Partnership") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the MGP, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and
 2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.
 
 By:
              /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
              Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
              March
      31, 2008
#### Michael J. Murphy, Respondent, v. The Staten Island Railway Company and Others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Hooker, JJ., dissented.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00268

- CR

GERARDO ALVAREZ

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 24th District Court of De Witt County , Texas Trial Cause No. 14

- 11

- 12,124

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 21, 2016
#### FULTON v. MUROV et al. *

No. 4422.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 6, 1933.

Foster, Hall, Barret & Smith and Julius T. Long, all of Shreveport, for' appellants. •

St. Clair Adams and *St.*Clair Adams, Jr., both of New Orleans, and Wise, Randolph, Rendall & Freyer, of Shreveport, for appel-lee.

*

Rehearing denied March 31, 1933.

DREW, Judge.

This suit arose out of the same accident as did the suit of Safety Tire Service, Incorporated, v. Murov, decided by this court and reported in 19 La. App. 663, 140 So. 879.

In the Safety Tire Service, Incorporated, Case, the owner of the truck which plaintiff in this suit was driving sued for damages sustained by the truck and its contents. In this suit, the driver of that same truck is suing for personal injuries received by him in the same accident.

In the former case, we held that defendant, Murov, was guilty of negligence in leaving a parked truck on the roadway after night, without lights, but that the driver of plaintiff’s truck (plaintiff in this suit) was guilty of contributory negligence such as to bar recovery. The contributory negligence of plaintiff’s driver was based upon the testimony of the driver himself that he saw the truck and the end gate of the truck at about the same time, and that he failed to bring his truck under control, after being blinded by the lights of an on-coming car, so as to be able to stop in case of an emergency. In that case, we disagreed with a decision o<f the First Circuit Court of Appeal. A writ of review to the Supreme Court in the case was applied for and refused.

In this case, which was tried after the Safety Tire Service, Incorporated, Case, the entire evidence in the Safety Tire Service Case was filed in evidence, and some additional testimony offered. The only additional evidence as to the contributory negligence of plaintiff is the testimony of plaintiff himself, who testified on some'material points entirely different from what he did when the Safety Tire Service Case was tried, and we are now asked by counsel for plaintiff to disregard his testimony given in the first case, and accept his testimony as given in this case.

We might have been forced to do so, had not the evidence in the former been filed as evidence in this case and made a part- of the record. There is no other evidence in this case bearing upon the contributory negligence of plaintiff than was offered in the former case, except the contradictory evidence of plaintiff 'himself, which he gave without in any way attempting to explain or show error in his former testimony. Therefore, we see no just reason for reversing out former opinion and ruling, that he was guilty of contributory negligence such as to bar his recovery.

In the case of Safety Tire Service, Incorporated, v. Murov, supra, the case is fully stated, discussed, and reasons given for the finding of the court, and, for the reasons therein assigned, the demand's of plaintiff heroin are rejected, and the judgment off the lower court is affirmed, with; costs.

MILLS, J., recused.
Exhibit
      99.4






CERTIFICATE
          PURSUANT TO
   18
          U.S.C.
          SECTION 1350
   AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
   SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
          connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB/A of
          Mortlock Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the period from September 19, 2005
          (date of inception) to June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
          Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof, I, William Timmins, Chief Accounting Officer,
          Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
          1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
   1.
          The
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
          of the
          Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
   2.
          The
          information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
   October
          20, 2006
   WILLIAM
          TIMMINS
  Chief
          Accounting Officer,
 Chief
          Financial Officer and Director







-1-
#### In the Matter of the Application of Jesse F. Orton for Admission to the Bar.

— Application granted. Present—hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BLS Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Brittany Prager, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best
of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BLS Media, Inc., and will be retained by BLS Media, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
      Brittany PragerBrittany
      Prager
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  May
      15, 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0248

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

REGINA LEE THOMPSON,

 Defendant and Appellant,

 

 ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an 

extension of time to and including May 1, 2022, within which to 

prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 22 2022

03/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0248