alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
====================================================================================================================

====================================================================================================================


                                                                                                           EXHIBIT 12
                                  PACIFIC BELL
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                               Dollars in Millions


<CAPTION>

                                                SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                    JUNE 30,                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                              ------------------   ---------------------------------------------------
                                                1997      1996       1996       1995      1994      1993        1992
                                              --------- ---------  ---------------------------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>         <C>
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before
   Income Taxes and Cumulative Effect of
   Accounting Changes                         $ (395)   $ 1,054    $ 1,945   $  1,538   $ 1,692    $  (39)   $  1,738
     Add:  Interest Expense                      219       182         363        410       439        429        460
          1/3 Rental Expense                      30        23          46         28        40         37         35
                                              --------- ---------  --------  ---------  --------   --------  ---------
     Adjusted Earnings                        $ (146)   $ 1,259    $ 2,354   $  1,976   $ 2,171    $   427   $  2,233
                                              ========= =========  ========  =========  ========   ========  =========

Total Interest Charges                        $  252    $  201     $   411   $    410   $   439    $   429   $    460
1/3 Rental Expense                                30        23          46         28        40         37         35
                                              --------- ---------  --------  ---------  --------   --------  ---------

     Adjusted Fixed Charges                   $  282    $  224     $    457  $    438   $   479    $   466   $     495
                                              ========= =========  ========= =========  ========   ========  =========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges              (0.52)     5.62        5.15      4.51      4.53        0.92      4.51

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric Arthur WALTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6758.

United States Court *of*Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 6, 2002.

Decided Nov. 20, 2002.

Eric Arthur Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Eric Arthur Walton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Walton has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Walton,*Nos. CR-94-21; CA-99-86 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 28, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 35.1**








**SERVICER
      COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**













RE:
      First
      Horizon ABS Trust 2006-HE1




We,
      the
      undersigned authorized officers of First Tennessee Bank National Association
      (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of March
      1, 2006 by and between First Horizon Asset Securities, Inc. as depositor, First
      Tennessee Bank National Association as master servicer, and The Bank of New
      York
      as trustee, do hereby certify that:




1.  A
      review
      of the Servicer’s activities during the period from March 1, 2006 and through
      December 31, 2006 and of the Servicer’s performance under the above described
      servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.




2.  To
      the
      best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
      of
      its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
      respects throughout such period.







First
                Tennessee Bank National AssociationBy:
            /s/
                Terry B. RenouxDate:
                3/26/07Name:
                Terry B. RenouxTitle:
                President, Consumer Finance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>
This financial data schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the consolidated financial statements included in P & F
Industries, Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            767,532
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,223,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                    26,104,842
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               42,534,874
<PP&E>                                         19,178,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,267,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 61,318,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          21,696,707
<BONDS>                                         7,675,451
<COMMON>                                        3,652,893
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,542,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   61,318,732
<SALES>                                        61,035,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               61,605,452
<CGS>                                          42,717,447
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,717,447
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,067,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,910,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,864,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,046,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,046,493
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .83
<FN>
<F1>
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE
</FN>



</TABLE>
#### MONTGOMERY WARD *&*COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUCCESSION OF Ace COLLINS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 6373.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1942.

Barksdale, Bullock, Clark & Van Hook and Carpenter & Brown, all of Shreveport, for appellant.

Harry V. Booth, of Shreveport, for ap-pellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

Both appellant and appellee have moved in writing the dismissal of the appeal in this cause. The request will be granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 840

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 6, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville,

North Carolina, as the ‘‘Walter B. Jones Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 215 South Evans Street in Greenville, North
2

HR 840 RFS

1 Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Walter

2 B. Jones Federal Building and United States Court3 house’’.

4 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

5 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

6 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

7 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec8 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Walter

9 B. Jones Federal Building and United States Court10 house’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6023 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 27, 2022 

Received 

AN ACT 

To require the United States Postal Service to continue 

selling the Multinational Species Conservation Funds 

Semipostal Stamp until all remaining stamps are sold, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6023 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multinational Species 

3 Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Reauthorization 

4 Act of 2021’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION; REQUIREMENT TO SELL ALL 

6 STAMPS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Multinational 

8 Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Act of 

9 2010 (39 U.S.C. 416 note; Public Law 111–241) is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘of at least 6 years,’’; and 

13 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

14 end the following: ‘‘and ending not earlier than 

15 the date on which the United States Postal 

16 Service provides notice to Congress under para17 graph (5)’’; and 

18 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(5) REQUIREMENT TO SELL ALL STAMPS

20 PRINTED.— 

21 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The United States 

22 Postal Service shall sell each copy of the Multi23 national Species Conservation Fund Semipostal 

24 Stamp that the United States Postal Service 

25 prints under this Act. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 6023 RDS

1 ‘‘(B) NOTIFICATION OF CONGRESS.—The 

2 United States Postal Service shall notify the 

3 Committee on Homeland Security and Govern4 mental Affairs in the Senate, the Committee on 

5 Environment and Public Works of the Senate, 

6 the Committee on Oversight and Reform of the 

7 House of Representatives, and the Committee 

8 on Natural Resources of the House of Rep9 resentatives when all copies of the Multinational 

10 Species Conservation Fund Semipostal Stamp 

11 printed under this Act have been sold.’’. 

12 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.—The amend13 ments made by subsection (a) shall take effect as if en14 acted on the day after the date of enactment of the Multi15 national Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp 

16 Reauthorization Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–165; 128 

17 Stat. 1878). 

18 SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS. 

19 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

20 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

21 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

22 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

23 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

24 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, proVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:56 May 04, 2022 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6023.RDS H6023

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 6023 RDS

1 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

2 vote on passage. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.iii.j



Form of Amendment
Dated
August 14, 2019
To 
The Mosaic Company
2014 Stock and Incentive Plan




6(i)(viii)  Minimum Vesting Requirement. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no Award (other than cash-only Awards that do not entitle the holder thereof to receive or purchase Shares) shall be granted with terms providing for any right of exercise or lapse of any vesting obligations earlier than a date that is at least one year following the date of grant (or, in the case of vesting based upon performance-based objectives, exercise and vesting restrictions cannot lapse earlier than the one-year anniversary measured from the commencement of the period over which performance is evaluated); provided, that the following shall not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: any (A) substitute Awards granted in connection with awards that are assumed, converted or substituted pursuant to a merger, acquisition or similar transaction entered into by the Company or any of its Affiliates, (B) Shares delivered in lieu of fully vested cash bonuses, (C) Awards to Non-Employee Directors that vest on earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of stockholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (D) any additional Awards the Committee may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 4(a) (subject to adjustment under Section 4(c)); and, provided, further, that the foregoing restriction does not apply to the Committee’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any Award, including in cases of retirement, death, disability or a change in control, in the terms of the Award Agreement or otherwise.  For purposes of counting Shares against the five percent (5%) limitation, the Share counting rules under Section 4 of the Plan apply.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6170 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6170

  To prohibit any entity from imposing a mandate that individuals be 
          vaccinated against COVID-19, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2021

 Mr. Van Drew introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit any entity from imposing a mandate that individuals be 
          vaccinated against COVID-19, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No COVID-19 Vaccination Mandate Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. NO MANDATES FOR VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19.

    Notwithstanding any Federal or State law, no institution or other 
entity, including any such Federal, State, local, Tribal, or private 
entity, may establish, implement, or enforce any mandate (including as 
a condition of employment, enrollment or attendance at school, or 
receipt of services) that any individual be vaccinated against SARS-
Cov-2 or COVID-19.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00653-CR

IN RE Abelardo GONZALEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 23, 2013

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED AS MOOT

On September 27, 2013, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, complaining 

of the trial court’s failure to rule on a pending motion in the underlying criminal proceedings. By 

the motion, relator sought to have the court lift the confidential designation from portions of the 

record of his criminal trial to allow him to obtain copies of record materials. On October 16, 2013, 

the real party in interest filed a response to the petition for writ of mandamus indicating that, upon 

further review, the State agreed relator should have access to the requested record materials. The 

real party in interest attached copies of the requested documents to its response, which has been 

provided to relator in this proceeding. Because relator has obtained the relief sought by his motion 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CRR-000657-D1; 2008-CRR-000662-D1; 2008-CRR-000665-D1, 

styled The State of Texas v. Abelardo Gonzalez, pending in the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the 

Honorable Jose A. Lopez presiding.

 
04-13-00653-CR

and the petition for writ of mandamus, relator’s petition is now moot. Accordingly, the petition for 

writ of mandamus is denied as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JUAN PASO-ANGELES, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10353

D.C . No. 4:13-c r-00254-R C C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na John C . C oughe nour, Distric t Judge , Pre siding * *

Subm itte d June 12, 2014 *** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , WA RDLAW , a

nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Jua n Pa s o-Ange le s a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c h a lle nge s his guilty -ple a c o nvic tion a nd 24-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry a fte r de porta

tion, in 

# FIL ED JUN 18 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble John C . C oughe nour, Se nior Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington, sitting by de signa tion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to A nde rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Pa s o-Ange l e s’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e have provide d Pa so-Ange le s the opportunity to filea pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or an s we ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Pa so-Ange l e s ha s wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion a

n d se nte nc e . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se eid. at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 3 - 1 0 3 5 3 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6284 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6284

    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule 
 relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
   grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened 
  wildlife and to issue a new rule removing the Northern Continental 
      Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from such list.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2021

   Mr. Rosendale (for himself, Mr. Westerman, Mr. Newhouse, and Mr. 
   Fulcher) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule 
 relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of 
   grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened 
  wildlife and to issue a new rule removing the Northern Continental 
      Divide Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from such list.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Science-Based Grizzly Bear 
Management Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF GRIZZLY BEARS OF THE GREATER YELLOWSTONE AND 
              NORTHERN CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ECOSYSTEMS FROM ENDANGERED 
              AND THREATENED LISTS.

    (a) Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.--Not later than 180 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
reissue the final rule relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone 
Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal List of 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife, published on June 30, 2017 (82 Fed. 
Reg. 30502), without regard to any other provision of statute or 
regulation that applies to issuance of such rule. Such reissuance and 
this subsection shall not be subject to judicial review.
    (b) Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem.--No later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall issue a final rule removing the Northern Continental Divide 
Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal List of 
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife without regard to any other 
provision of statute or regulation that applies to the issuance of such 
rule. Such issuance and this subsection shall not be subject to 
judicial review.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL FRANCIS P. BRADLEY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2569 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 148 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 77283

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8 th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of the Verified

Statement of Resignation, Michael Francis P. Bradley is disbarred on consent from the

Bar of this Commonwealth, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the provisions

of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).