alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1710

DAVID E. HENDERSON, Plaintiff – Appellant,

v. JOHN NALAND, President American Foreign Service Association (AFSA); SHARON LATE, General Counsel American Foreign Service Association (AFSA), Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00535-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David E. Henderson appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against Defendants asserting they wrongfully refused to assist him in obtaining the medical retirement benefits he was allegedly denied in 1981. Because Henderson may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismissal order is interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods,

Inc. , 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EX-4.39



 Exhibit 4.39 

Attachment: China Minsheng Banking Co.,Ltd. Convertible Bond Purchase Form 

Important Notice 
 Once this form has been
filled up and signed by the legal representative (or authorized representative) together with the official seal and then faxed to the co-sponsor (co-lead manager), it will constitute an irrevocable purchase offer to the co-sponsor (Co-lead manager)
with legal effect. 

Fax:  010-58328677            Hotline:  010-58328678    
        Fax confirmation telephone;  010-58328766 
  

							
	Name of the Company	  	Shanghai Giant Network Technology Co., Ltd.
		
	ID Number	  	310104000301331
				
	Address	  	Building No.3, No.700 Yishan Road, Shanghai, China	  	Post Code	  	200233
				
	User Name for Security Account (Shanghai)	  	Shanghai Giant Network Technology Co., Ltd.	  	Security Account Number (Shanghai)	  	B883063077
				
	Name of the Agent	  	Wang Hongren	  	Office Phone	  	(021)33979999-4728
				
	Agent’s ID Number	  	210203198909254789	  	Mobile Phone	  	18616783035
				
	E-Mail Address	  	wanghongren@ztgame.com	  	Fax	  	(021)33979948
			
	Refund Bank Information ( the bank account to receive refund shall be the same as the bank account originally transfer the money out)	  	Name of the Receiving Bank	  	China Minsheng Bank, Shanghai Xinan Branch
	  	  
 Receiving Account Number
	  	  
 0224014170018647

	  	  
 Name of the Receiver
	  	  
 Shanghai Giant Network Technology Co., Ltd.

	  	  
 Address of the Receiving Bank
	  	  
 No. 333 Zhaojiabang Road, Shanghai, China

	  	  
 High Value Payment System Number
	  	  
 305290002246

		
	Type of the Purchase ( can only choose between A and B)	  	A
		
	Amount of the Purchased bond	  	Eighty five million (85,000,000)
		
	Price (amount of the Purchased bond *100 Yuan)	  	Eighty five hundred million Yuan ( 8,500,000,000 Yuan)
		
	Down Payment for the Purchase (Price*20%)	  	Seventeen hundred million Yuan (1,700,000,000 Yuan)
	  
 Investor’s Promise: the Investor promises that
all the information provided above is true, accurate, complete and valid; the capital used to purchase the bond is in compliance with relevant law, regulations and requirements prescribed by China Securities Regulatory Commission.

 
 Signature of legal Representative (authorized representative):

Date
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **1 -**  **1126**

EMMANUEL OGBONNAYA NWANKWO , P etitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , Attorney General , Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigratio n Appeals

.

Submitted : July 12, 2011 Decided: August 24, 2011

Before WILKINSON , KING, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Petition d ismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Emmanuel Ogbonnaya Nwankwo , Petitioner Pro Se
. Kiley L. Kane , Office of Immi gration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Emmanuel Ogbonnaya Nwankwo , a native and citizen of Nigeria , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying Nwankwo’s request for a continuance, pretermitting his request for a § 212(c) waiver of inadmissibility , *

Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C) (2006), we lack jurisdiction, except as provided in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2006), to review the final order of removal of an alien wh o is removable for having been convicted of certain enumerated crimes, including a controlled substance violation

. Because Nwankwo conceded before the immigration court that he is an alien who was found removable for having been convicted of a controlled substance violation, a concession which he does not challenge on appeal, our review is limited to “constitutional claims or questions of law.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D); Mbea v. Gonzales , 482 F.3 d 276, 278 n.1 (4th Cir. 2007). and ordering his removal t o Nigeria . For the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the petition for review.

We have thoroughly rev iewed Nwankwo’s informal brief and the administrative record and conclude we are without jurisdiction to consider Nwankwo’s claims. Nwankwo failed to

* See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (1994) (repealed 1 996).3 exhaust his administrative remedies by presenting his claims on appeal to the Board

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (d)(1) (2006); Massis v. Mukasey , 549 F.3d 631, 638

- 40 (4th Cir. 2008). We also find that he failed to raise a colorable constitutional claim or question of law that would fall within the exception set forth in § 1252(a)(2)(D)

. See Barco

- Sandoval v. Gonz ales , 516 F.3d 35, 40

- 41 (2d Cir. 2008) (finding that a criminal alien must raise a colorable constitutional claim or question of law in order for a federal appellate cou rt to have jurisdiction under § 1252(a)(2)(D)). We therefore dismiss the petition f or review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED
183 La. 452

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Marshall BROWN, Appellant.

No. 33430.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1935.

Pegues & Pegues, of Mansfield, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., Jas. O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., A. B. Cava-naugh, Dist. Atty., of Leesville, and Less-ley P. Gardiner, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRUNOT, Justice..

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of De Soto parish with the offense of selling intoxicating liquor in said parish, where, by ordinance of the police jury, the sale thereof is prohibited. He was tried, convicted of the offense charged, and sentenced to pay a fine of $301 and costs of the prosecution, or, in default of the payment of the fine, to imprisonment in the parish jail, subject to work *on the*public roads of *the*parish, for a term of five months. This sentence to run concurrently with the sentence in caso No. 8484, the sentence in this case to be suspended.

The defendant appealed from the verdict and sentence, and relies for a reversal of the verdict and sentence upon the same bills this court has disposed of in its opinion this day handed down in State of Louisiana v. Marshall Brown, 164 So. 241.

For the reasons assigned in said case, the verdict and sentence appealed from in this case are affirmed.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**P&FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&FIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                  | /s/  RICHARD A. HOROWITZ      |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Richard  A. Horowitz          |
| Date  August 19, 2009 | *Principal Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**P&FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&FIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                  | /s/  JOSEPH A. MOLINO, JR.    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Joseph  A. Molino, Jr.        |
| Date  August 19, 2009 | *Principal Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has det ermined t hat this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20315

(Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GIULIANO BARBIERI and JOSE BELTRAN

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(USDC No. CR-H-94-0248)

January 14, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Giuliano Barbieri and Jose Beltran appeal from their convictions and sentences for aiding and

abetting possession with intent to distribute in excess of five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841. Our review of the record and the argument s and authorities convince us that no

reversible error was committed.2

This court lacks jurisdiction to address Beltran’s challenge to the district court’s refusal to

grant Beltran a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. S ee United States v. DiMarco

,

46 F.3d 476, 477-78 (5th Cir. 1995). Nor has Barbieri shown that the district court erred by refusing

to reduce his offense level based on his asserted mitigating role in the offense. S ee United States v.

Devine , 934 F.2d 1325, 1340 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 929 (1991).

The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to allow a reasonable jury to find Barbieri guilty

beyond a reasonable doubt. S ee United States v. Polk , 56 F.3d 613, 619 (5th Ci r. 1995). The

evidence also supported the district court’s decision to give the jury an instruction on deliberat e

ignorance. S ee United States v. Faulkner , 17 F.3d 745, 766 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 115 S. Ct. 193

(1994). Finally, because the facts available to the arresting officers warranted a person of reasonable

caution to believe that an offense was being committed, prob able cause exi sted to support the

warrantless arrests, and the district court d i d not err in denying Barbieri’s motion to suppress the

evidence seized during the arrest. S ee United States v. Tellez

, 11 F.3d 530, 532 (5th Cir. 1993), cert.

denied , 114 S. Ct. 1630 (1994); United States v. Raborn , 872 F.2d 589, 593 (5th Cir. 1989).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49496-49497]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-8943; ASLBP No. 08-867-02-OLA-BD01]


Crow Butte Resources, Inc.; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the 
following proceeding:

Crow Butte Resources, Inc. (In Situ Leach Uranium Recovery Facility)

    This proceeding involves a license amendment application from Crow 
Butte Resources, Inc. seeking a 10-year renewal of its Source Materials 
License for the in situ leach uranium recovery facility located in 
Crawford, Nebraska. In response to a May 27, 2008 Notice of Opportunity 
for Hearing (73 FR 30426), petitions to intervene and requests for 
hearing have been submitted by (1) Elizabeth Lorina and Mario Gonzales 
representing the Oglala Sioux Tribe, (2)

[[Page 49497]]

Shane Robinson and David Frankel representing multiple individuals and 
multiple organizations, and (3) Thomas J. Ballanco representing the 
Oglala Delegation of the Great Sioux Nation Treaty Council.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Michael M. Gibson, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Richard F. Cole, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Brian K. Hajek, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    Additionally, during the contention admissibility phase of this 
proceeding, Administrative Judge Alan S. Rosenthal shall function as 
the Board's Special Assistant.
    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day of August, 2008.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E8-19383 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000075491
<NAME> PGT
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      1052513
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     135924
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           75670
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         59117
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1323224
<COMMON>                                         85474
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       192000
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             175883
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  453357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            559058
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   67535
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      16871
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   376
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  226027
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  1323224
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       202369
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             22905
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      107831
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      130736
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          71633
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               (1254)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   70379
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         34979
<NET-INCOME>                                     35400
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    35400
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        22047
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          120137
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    35400
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    35400
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 4

- 1295

_____________________________
R ICHARD E. W ILSON ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

October 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State , 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022); Granville v. State , 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)

.2 R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and L ONG , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Richard E. Wilson
, pro se, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**P&FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Joseph A. Molino, Jr.  |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A. Molino, Jr.       |   |
| Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                        |   |
|                        |   |
| May 12, 2008           |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19216]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / 
Notices

[[Page 49159]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Northwest Agricultural Products, Inc. of Pasco, Washington, an 
exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. 5,552,315, ``Bacteria for the 
Control of Fusarium Dry Rot of Potatoes'', issued on September 3, 1996, 
U.S. Patent No. 5,783,411, ``Bacterial Control of Fusarium Dry Rot of 
Potatoes'', issued on July 21, 1998, and U.S. Patent No. 6,107,247, 
``Biological Control of Sprouting in Potatoes'', issued on August 22, 
2000.

DATES: Comments must be received within thirty (30) days of the date of 
publication of this Notice in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Northwest Agricultural 
Products, Inc. of Pasco, Washington has submitted a complete and 
sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license 
will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license 
may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this 
published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written 
evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license 
would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 
CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-19216 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 21, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133575 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. CHRISTOPHER DAWAYNE LAMAR, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 133575 COA: 272966 Oakland CC: 2005-066668-NO RAMADA FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC., SAM SALMAN YONO, GANDHI DAVID YONO, SAYO, INC., d/b/a RAMADA INN SOUTHFIELD, d/b/a YESTERDAYS, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the February 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REINSTATE the order of the Oakland Ci rcuit Court granting summary disposition to the defendants. The Court of Appeals erred in concluding th at any questions about when a fight started and how long it had been going on before the de fendants’ employees contacted the police created a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendants took reasonable measures to respond to that fight. MacDonald v PKT, Inc, 464 Mich 322, 336 (2001).

K ELLY , J., would deny leave to appeal.

l0914 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2007

Clerk