U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Profiling Police: Evaluating the Predictive and Structural Validity of an Actuarial Method for Screening Civil Liabilities Among Police Officer Candidates
NCJ Number
              214121

Author(s)
          Ivory A. Toldson Ph.D.
Date Published

2006
Length
              32 pages
Annotation
              This study examined the predictive and structural validity of an actuarial method for predicting traits associated with negligent and volatile behavior among police officer candidates.
Abstract
              The results revealed that an actuarial approach to police officer candidate screening can offer a robust prediction of police behavior and can improve the prediction of civil liability indicators among police officers. Candidates demonstrating the following profiles were found to be more likely to become “bad” police officers: evasiveness, bizarre mentality, family problems, insubordination, and prior complaints. An actuarial approach to police candidate screening involves comparing a candidate’s profile, generally determined through psychological screenings, to thousands of preexisting profiles of police officers to determine whether the candidate is more similar to “good cops” or “bad cops.” In this study, investigators assessed whether the three main civil liabilities of Excessive Force, Racially Offensive Behavior, and Sexually Offensive Behavior could be predicted based on variables from a preexisting database of 2,852 police officers who completed assessments at a private police psychological practice. Indices of “good” and “bad” police officers was determined on the basis of post-test assessments, supervisor ratings, incident reports, reprimands, and civilian complaints. Data were initially analyzed through the use of principal components analysis with varimax, stepwise multiple regression analyses, and confirmatory factor analysis. The authors then used a model development approach in which structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test models, followed by the testing of alternative models suggested by SEM modification indexes. Future research should assess standards of police psychological screenings. Figures, tables, references
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2003-IJ-CX-1006


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Study/Research)


  
  
        
  Award
        Evaluating the Predictive & Structural Validity
    
  
  
Date Published: January 1, 2006
    
          Downloads
        
                      PDF

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Hiring and promotions
        NIJ Grant-related Documents
        Police personnel selection
        Police recruits
        Psychologists role in policing



  
Similar Publications
        
                      4F-MDMB-BINACA: A New Synthetic Cannabinoid Widely Implicated in Forensic Casework
                  Nanomanipulation-Coupled to Nanospray Mass Spectrometry Applied to Document and Ink Analysis
                  GC-MS Studies on the Regioisomeric 2 3- and 3 4-Methylenedioxyphenethylamines Related to MDEA MDMMA and MBDB
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov