Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 165 / Monday, August 25, 2008 / Notices 50009 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0695. 

Title: Section 87.219, Automatic 

Operations. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 60 

respondents; 60 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: .7 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement, recordkeeping 

requirement, and third party disclosure 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Total Annual Burden: 42 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $6,468. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted as an extension (no change 

in reporting requirements, 

recordkeeping and/or third party 

disclosure requirements) after this 60 

day comment period to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) in order 

to obtain the full three year clearance. 

The Commission has adjusted the 

number of respondents and responses 

due to an increase in the number of 

respondents for this information 

collection. Therefore, we are reporting a 

+7 hour adjustment in the total annual 

burden. 

Section 87.219 requires that if airports 

have control towers or Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) flight service 

stations, and more than one licensee 

wants to have an automated 

aeronautical advisory station (Unicom), 

they must write an agreement outlining 

who will be responsible for the 

Unicom’s operation, sign the agreement 

and keep a copy of the agreement with 

each licensee’s station authorization. 

Specifically, only one automated 

Unicom may be operated at an 

uncontrolled airport. Prior to the 

operation of an automated Unicom at an 

airport with more than one Unicom 

licensee, all of the licensees at that 

airport must sign a letter of agreement 

stating which licensee(s) control the 

automated Unicom operations, and, if 

control is to be shared among several 

operators, how that control will be 

divided or scheduled. The original or a 

copy of the letter of agreement must be 

kept with each licensee’s station 

records. Within 90 days of the date 

upon which a new Unicom operator is 

licensed at an airport where more than 

one Unicom is authorized, and an 

automated Unicom is being operated, an 

amended letter of agreement that 

includes the new licensee’s signature 

must be sign or automated Unicom 

operations must cease. 

The information will be used by 

compliance personnel for enforcement 

purposes and by licensees to clarify 

responsibility in operating Unicom. 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0740. 

Title: Section 95.1015, Disclosure 

Policies. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 26 

respondents; 26 responses. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement, recordkeeping 

requirement, and third party disclosure 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Total Annual Burden: 26 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $1,300. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted as an extension (no change 

in reporting requirements, 

recordkeeping and/or third party 

disclosure requirements) after this 60 

day comment period to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) in order 

to obtain the full three year clearance. 

Manufacturers of Low Power Radio 

Service (LPRS) transmitters used for 

auditory assistance, health care 

assistance, and law enforcement 

tracking purposes must include with 

each transmitting device the following 

statement: ‘‘This transmitter is 

authorized by rule under the Low Power 

Radio Service (47 CFR Part 95) and must 

not cause harmful interference to TV 

reception or United States Navy 

SPASUR installations. You do not need 

an FCC license to operate this 

transmitter. This transmitter may only 

be used to provide: auditory assistance 

to persons with disabilities, persons 

who require language translation, or 

persons in educational settings; health 

care services to the ill; law enforcement 

tracking services under agreement with 

a law enforcement agency; or automated 

maritime telecommunications system 

(AMTS) network control 

communications. Two-way voice 

communications and all other types of 

uses not mentioned above are expressly 

prohibited.’’

Prior to operating a LPRS transmitter 

for AMTS purposes, an AMTS licensee 

must notify, in writing, each television 

station that may be affected by such 

operations, as defined in 47 CFR 

80.215(h) of the Commission’s rules. 

The notification provided with the 

station’s license application is sufficient 

to satisfy this requirement if no new 

television stations would be affected. 

The information is used by 

Commission staff and affected television 

stations to be aware of the location of 

potential harmful interference from 

AMTS operations. If this information 

was not available, the location of 

potential harmful interference from 

AMTS operations would be negatively 

affected. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8–19548 Filed 8–22–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority, Comments Requested 

August 12, 2008. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on 

this information collection should 

submit comments October 24, 2008. If 

you anticipate that you will be 


ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES
50010 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 165 / Monday, August 25, 2008 / Notices 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), (202) 

395–5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167, 

or via the Internet at 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and 

to Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov, Federal 

Communications Commission (FCC). To 

submit your comments by e-mail send 

them to: PRA@fcc.gov. 

To view a copy of this information 

collection request (ICR) submitted to 

OMB: (1) Go to the Web page http:// 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, 

(2) look for the section of the Web page 

called ‘‘Currently Under Review’’, (3) 

click the downward-pointing arrow in 

the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box and (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the title 

of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, 

if there is one) and then click on the ICR 

Reference Number to view detailed 

information about this ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information, send an e-mail 

to Judith B. Herman at 202–418–0214. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0223. 

Title: Section 90.129, Supplemental 

Information to be Routinely Submitted 

with Applications, Non-type Accepted 

Equipment. 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households, business or other for-profit, 

not-for-profit institutions, and State, 

local or tribal governments. 

Number of Respondents: 10 

respondents; 10 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .33 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation To Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Total Annual Burden: 4 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: Yes. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

This information collection does 

contain personally identifiable 

information (PII) on individuals. The 

FCC maintains a system of records 

notice (SORN), FCC/WTB–1, ‘‘Wireless 

Services Licensing Records,’’ that covers 

the collection, purpose(s), storage, 

safeguards, and disposal of the PII that 

individual private land mobile radio 

licensees maintain under 47 CFR 

90.129. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted as an extension (no change 

in reporting requirements) after this 60 

day comment period to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) in order 

to obtain the full three year clearance. 

Section 90.129 requires that 

applicants proposing to use transmitting 

equipment that is not type-certified by 

FCC laboratory personnel to provide a 

description of the proposed equipment. 

This assures that the equipment is 

capable of performing within certain 

tolerances that limit the interference 

potential of the device. 

Additionally, this rule section 

requires that each application under this 

part that is received by the Commission, 

through the application process 

outlined in 47 CFR part 1, subpart F, 

must be accompanied by the applicable 

supplementary information described in 

the paragraphs in 47 CFR 90.129. The 

information is used by FCC engineers to 

determine the interference potential of 

the proposed equipment. 

OMB Control No.: 3060–0770. 

Title: Sections 61.49 and 69.4, Price 

Cap Performance Review for Local 

Exchange Carriers, FCC 99–206 (New 

Services). 

Form No.: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Respondents: 21 

respondents; 21 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 10 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation To Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. 

Total Annual Burden: 210 hours. 

Annual Cost Burden: $16,275. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. The 

Commission is not requesting that the 

respondents submit confidential 

information to the FCC. However, 

respondents who wish to request 

confidential treatment of the 

information they believe to be 

confidential, may do so under 47 CFR 

0.459 of the Commission’s rules. 

Needs and Uses: This collection will 

be submitted as an extension (no change 

in reporting requirements) after this 60 

day comment period to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) in order 

to obtain the full three year clearance. 

In the Fifth Report and Order in FCC 

99–206, the Commission permitted 

price cap local exchange carriers (LECs) 

to introduce new services on a 

streamlined basis, without prior 

approval. The Commission adopted 

rules to eliminate the public interest 

showing required by section 69.4(g) and 

eliminated the new services test (except 

in the case of loop-based new services) 

required under sections 69.49(f) and (g). 

These modifications eliminated delays 

that existed for the introduction of new 

services as well as encouraging efficient 

investment and innovation. 

The information is used by the 

Commission to determine whether this 

is in the public interest for the 

incumbent LEC to offer a proposed new 

switched access service. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8–19549 Filed 8–22–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Public Information 

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the 

Federal Communications Commission 

for Extension Under Delegated 

Authority, Comments Requested 

August 13, 2008. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork burden 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection(s), as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. An 

agency may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning (a) 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and (d) ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 


ebenthall on PRODPC60 with NOTICES