alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**P & FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P & F Industries, Inc.

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| August 16, 2004 |                           |   | /s/ Joseph A. Molino, Jr. |   |
|----------------------|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Date                 | Joseph A.  Molino, Jr.    |   |
|                 | *Principal  Financial Officer* |   |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
  I,  
Paul F. Norris, certify that:
  1.
     I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual
report on Form 10-K/A of Sonic Solutions; and
  2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.
  February
5, 2010
 
 /s/
      Paul F. NorrisPaul
      F. NorrisExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand
      General Counsel
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc. Mortgage Loan Trust,
     Series 2006-AF1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage,
     LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage
     Funding, Inc. as Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer, National
     City Mortgage Co., as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer,
     Residential Funding Corporation, as Servicer and Select Portfolio
     Servicing, Inc., as Servicer.

     Dated:    May 28, 2008

     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2023 ND 67

Byron Whetsel, Petitioner and Appellant

 v.

The State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20220351

Appeal from the District Court of Ransom County, Southeast Judicial District, 

the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Fallon M. Kelly, State’s Attorney, Lisbon, ND, for respondent and appellee.

FILED 

IN THE OFFICE OF THE 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

MARCH 31, 2023 

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1

Whetsel v. State

No. 20220351

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Byron Whetsel appeals from an order summarily dismissing his 

application for post-conviction relief before an evidentiary hearing was held. 

Whetsel applied for post-conviction relief on August 4, 2022, approximately 

five years after being convicted of criminal charges. He argues his sentences 

are unconstitutional pursuant to the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against 

cruel and unusual punishment. The district court dismissed his application 

finding that Whetsel did not satisfy any condition under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-

01(3) warranting consideration outside the statutory two-year period for 

requesting relief, and that Whetsel did not provide adequate evidentiary support 

for his claims to warrant a hearing. We conclude the district court properly

dismissed Whetsel’s application under these circumstances. We summarily 

affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). See Atkins v. State, 2017 ND 290, ¶ 6, 

904 N.W.2d 738 (finding summary denial of post-conviction relief appropriate 

when the State moves for summary disposition, and a petitioner fails to provide 

some competent evidence to support his claims).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr
#### John D. Crimmins, Appellant, v. Carlyle Realty Company and Vadrick Realty Company, Respondents, Impleaded with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.

— Order modified by striking out the provision allowing the defendant to deposit §1,500 in court, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents. No opinion. Settle order on notice.'
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6289 

To provide the consent of Congress to an amendment to the Constitution 

of the State of New Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2021 

Ms. STANSBURY (for herself and Ms. LEGER FERNANDEZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide the consent of Congress to an amendment to 

the Constitution of the State of New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSENT OF CONGRESS TO AMENDMENT TO 

4 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEW 

5 MEXICO. 

6 Congress consents to the amendment to the Constitu7 tion of the State of New Mexico proposed by House Joint 

8 Resolution 1 of the 55th Legislature of the State of New 

9 Mexico, First Session, 2021, entitled ‘‘A Joint Resolution 

10 Proposing an Amendment to Article 12, Section 7 of the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6289 IH

1 Constitution of New Mexico to Provide for Additional An2 nual Distributions of the Permanent School Fund for En3 hanced Instruction for Students at Risk of Failure, Ex4 tending the School Year, Teacher Compensation and 

5 Early Childhood Education; Requiring Congressional Ap6 proval for Distributions for Early Childhood Education’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2



         Effective June 25, 2001, the Board of Directors of Paradyne Networks,
Inc. adopted the following amendments to the Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the "Bylaws"):

         1. Article III, Section 20(a) of the Bylaws was deleted in its entirety
and the following paragraph was inserted in lieu thereof:

            "(A) ANNUAL MEETING. The annual meeting of the Board of Directors
         shall be held immediately before or after the annual meeting of
         stockholders and at the place where such meeting is held. No notice of
         an annual meeting of the Board of Directors shall be necessary, and
         such meeting shall be held for the purpose of electing officers and
         transacting such other business as may lawfully come before it.
         Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of an annual meeting of the
         Board of Directors, the Board of Directors may elect to take the
         actions described above by unanimous written consent."

         2. Article III, Section 22 of the Bylaws was deleted in its entirety
and the following paragraph was inserted in lieu thereof:

            "SECTION 22. ACTION WITHOUT MEETING. Unless otherwise restricted by
         the Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, any action required
         or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of Directors or of
         any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all members of
         the Board of Directors or committee, as the case may be, consent
         thereto in writing, or by electronic transmission, and the writing or
         writings or electronic transmission or transmissions are filed with the
         minutes of proceedings of the Board of Directors or committee."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 14, 2015

No. 04-14-00720-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF N.D.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-MH-3263

Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time 

is extended to January 19, 2015 with no further extensions.

___________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 4, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00061

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S.O. , Child,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial C ourt No. 2012

- PA

- 01423 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Accordingly, this court must dispose of this appeal no later than 180 days after the date the notice of appeal was filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN . 6. The portion of the reporter’s record for this appeal to be prepared by Mr. David Zarate was due to be filed on January 27, 2014

. 1 Mr. Zarate has not responded to informal efforts by the clerk’s office seeking an update on the status of the filing of the record. It is therefore ORDERED that Mr. Zarate file his portion of the reporter’s record in this court no later than ten days from the date of this order. FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE THE RECORD WILL BE DISFAVORED

.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of February, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk o f Court

1 Delcine Benavides has filed the other portion of the reporter’s record.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6319]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Shigeyuki Kihara: Living Photographs''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Shigeyuki Kihara: Living Photographs,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about October 7, 2008, until on 
or about February 1, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: August 11, 2008.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-18962 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
SONS-EX 10.10 2014.03.28




Exhibit 10.10
Mr. Jeffrey M. Snider
By electronic delivery
 


Dear Jeff:
 
Based on your desire to demonstrate your support for Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) and its 
prospects, the Compensation Committee has considered and will agree to your request to forgo the payment 
of your cash bonus for 2013 and, if any such bonus would have been earned, to instead accept a grant of 
shares of the Company’s common stock.
 
The May 29, 2009 employment agreement, as amended (your “Agreement”), outlining the terms and 
conditions of your employment by the Company is hereby amended as follows:
 
		
	1.
	You have elected to receive your fiscal year 2013 bonus (“2013 Bonus”), if any is earned, in the 


form of shares of the Company’s common stock (“2013 Bonus Shares”), which will be granted 
and have the terms described below:
 
		
	a.
	The number of 2013 Bonus Shares granted will equal 1.5 times your actual 2013 Bonus 


earned, which bonus shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole 
discretion subject to the terms of the 2013 bonus program, divided by the closing price of the 
Company’s shares on the date of grant.


		
	b.
	The 2013 Bonus Shares will be granted and vest in full on the grant date, which shall be 


concurrent with the timing of normal 2013 bonus payouts.
 
Notwithstanding any provisions in your employment agreement, as amended, you must remain an 
employee of the Company on the grant date in order to receive the 2013 Bonus Shares (if earned).  The 
parties hereby acknowledge that the Compensation Committee retains the right, in its sole discretion, to pay 
your 2013 Bonus in cash pursuant to the terms of your Agreement as opposed to payment in 2013 Bonus 
Shares; provided that, if the Company is the subject of an acquisition or change of control prior to the grant 
date, if the Compensation Committee of the Company (or its successor) elects to pay the 2013 Bonus, if 
any, in cash, such cash payment will equal 1.5 times your actual 2013 Bonus earned, if any.  


Except as modified by the terms of this letter agreement, the terms of you employment, including without 
limitation, the terms reflected in the Agreement and all Company plans, programs and policies, will remain 
unaltered and in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms not defined in this letter have the same definitions 
given to them in the Agreement.
 
Very truly yours,
 
/s/ Raymond P. Dolan
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Raymond P. Dolan
	 
	 
	 
	 

	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	ACCEPTED:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
/s/ Jeffrey M. Snider
	 
	 
03/28/2013
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Jeffrey M. Snider
	 
	Date
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION




I, William Threadgill, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of STRATS(SM) Trust For Allstate Corporation Securities, Series 2006-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;




4.           Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.







Dated: March 30, 2010
By:
/s/ William ThreadgillWilliam ThreadgillPresident

(senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization)
#### Lesh & Matthews Lumber Co. v. John Sedlaceck.

1. *Practice—Propositions of Law Where a Cause is Tried Without a*Jury.—Propositions of law submitted to be held, where a cause is tried without a jury, should state the law only.

Assumpsit.—Appeal from the County Court of Cook County; the Hon. John H. Batten, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 11, 1902.

This was an action to recover the purchase price of certain lumber sold by appellant to the Filip *&*Raichart Manufacturing Company, which price it was claimed appel lee, before the sale,promised in consideration thereof to pay.

Upon the trial there was evidence tending to show that the Filip *&*Raichart Manufacturing Company, being indebted to appellant for lumber and desiring to obtain more, appellee agreed to assume the account and pay the same partly in cash and partly in time notes, and that the old account was discharged. There was also evidence tending to show that appellee, being a stockholder and the treasurer of the Filip & Raichart Company, thereafter said that “ if the Lesh & Matthews Lumber Company was willing to sell them lumber from time to time he would assume the account and see it paid.” The lumber was charged on appellant’s books to the Filip & Raichart Company and several notes therefor were given by it to appellant; these notes were indorsed, by appellee and "were paid. At the time of the failure of the Filip & Raichart Company it was owing appellant $692.48.

The cause was submitted to the court, jury being waived.

The court found the issues for the defendant and entered judgment on such finding.

Daniel Y. Samuels, attorney for appellant.

Goldzier, Rodgers & Froehlich, attorneys for appellee.

*154Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the court.

The evidence is not such that we can say that the finding of the court is so at variance with the evidence that the judgment should be set aside.

The action of appellant after the promise it claims was made by appellee, in charging the goods to the Filip & Eaichart Company and from time to time taking its notes therefor indorsed by appellant, was such that therefrom the court might find under the evidence, as it did, that the undertaking of appellee was within the statute of frauds.

The so-called propositions of law submitted to the court were not such as the statute contemplates. They are requested to find from the evidence certain facts, and thereupon to find the issues for the plaintiff. Propositions of law submitted to be held, where a cause is tried without a jury, should state the law only. O’Bannon v. Vigus, *32*Ill. App. 473-500; Field v. Crawford, 146 Ill. 136; First National Bank v. Northwestern Bank, 152 Ill. 296; Fosselman v. Springfield, 38 Ill. App. 296; Alexander v. Alexander, 52 Ill. App. 195; Dwelling House Insurance Co. v. Butterly, 133 Ill. 534.

Ho propositions of law having been submitted, we find no error in the record here presented, warranting a reversal of the judgment of the County Court. It'is therefore affirmed.