alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended March 31, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Horace Inman, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Smith, P. J., and Cochrane, J., dissenting.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

BOOMERANG RECOVERIES, LLC,

Petitioner

v.

GUY CARPENTER & COMPANY, LLC AND

MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 6 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
47916 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–18645 Filed 8–14–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–37] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–37 

with attached transmittal, policy 

justification, and Sensitivity of 

Technology. 

Dated: August 5, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 47917 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN15AU08.020</GPH>
47918 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN15AU08.021</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 47919 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN15AU08.022</GPH>
47920 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN15AU08.024</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 47921 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICESEN15AU08.025</GPH>
47922 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 159 / Friday, August 15, 2008 / Notices 

[FR Doc. E8–18651 Filed 8–14–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–91] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–91 

with attached transmittal, and policy 

justification. 

Dated: August 5, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20881

Conference Calendar

__________________

LINDSEY MCADAMS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

OSHA, Director,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-94-436

- - - - - - - - - -

April 18, 1996

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lindsey McAdams has appealed the district court's dismissal

of his suit, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. 

Nevertheless, he has failed to brief any issue. Issues that are

not briefed are deemed abandoned. See United States v. Wilkes,

20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir. 1994); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,

225 (5th Cir. 1993). Because he has abandoned any appellate

issue, McAdams's appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED as

such. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

We caution McAdams that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of
No. 95-20881

-2-

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, McAdams is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 39620

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

QUINTON JARMAIN ROWE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 685

Filed: October 19, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jordan E. Taylor, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Quinton Jarmain Rowe pled guilty to an amended charge of possession of a controlled 

substance. I.C. § 37-2732(c)(1). In exchange for his guilty plea, the state also dismissed a 

sentencing enhancement. The district court sentenced Rowe to a unified term of seven years, 

with a minimum period of confinement of three years. The district court retained jurisdiction 

and, following successful completion of his rider, Rowe was placed on probation. Rowe 

thereafter violated the terms of his probation, and the district court revoked probation and 

ordered execution of Rowe’s original sentence. Rowe filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the 

district court denied. Rowe appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 
2

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). An appeal from the 

denial of a Rule 35 motion cannot be used as a vehicle to review the underlying sentence absent 

the presentation of new information. Id. Because no new or additional information in support of 

Rowe’s Rule 35 motion was presented, the district court did not abuse its discretion. For the 

foregoing reasons, the district court’s order denying Rowe’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.01











CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Aspect L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Davis, President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



















By:             /s/       Walter Davis





Name:                    Walter Davis


Title:                      President of Ceres Managed Futures LLC,


general partner of the registrant





Date:                      March 29, 2011
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3931

_____________________________
T OBIAS C LEVON C ARROLL , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Cour t for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

.
June 5 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , J AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

___ __________________________2 Tobias Clevon Carroll, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eddie Sandoval Soto, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 23382.

Vs. No. 11-15-00022-CR * July 16, 2015

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and McCall, sitting by 

assignment)

(Bailey, J., not participating)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:   November 14, 2005
         -----------------

By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    ----------------------------
    Robert A. Levinson
    Chief Executive Officer

                                    Page 38
Exhibit 3.143

[LOGO]    PAGE 1
The First State

I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION OF "TERRAMINA LLC", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL, A.D. 2004, AT 2:01 O'CLOCK P.M.

|                |  |        |  | /s/ Harriet Smith Windsor                
|--------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                |  | [SEAL] |  | Harriet Smith Windsor, Secretary of State
|3792679    8100 |  |        |  | AUTHENTICATION: 3062599                  
|040287760       |  |        |  | DATE: 04-20-04                           

---



CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION        OF        TERRAMINA LLC

1.     The
name of the limited liability company is Terramina LLC,

2.     The
address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle. The name
of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREFOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of Terramina LLC this 20th day of April, 2004.

| | /s/JOHN R. NYWEIDEJohn R. Nyweide, Authorized Person
| | ----------------------------------------------------

DE083 - 5/5/00 C T System Online

| |  | State of Delaware
Secretary of State
Division of Corporations
Delivered 02:07 PM 04/20/2004
FILED 02:01 PM 04/20/2004
SRV 040287760 - 3792679 FILE
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



Consent of Independent Auditors



We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption selected financial data and to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-112417 and 333-108937) of our report dated January 27, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of DSP Group, Inc. for the three- year period ended December 31, 2003 included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



/s/    Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer A Member of Ernst & Young Global




Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 14, 2004
#### Henry M. Rau, Respondent, v. Daniel S. McElroy and Linda L. McElroy, His Wife, Appellants, Impleaded with William N. Heard and Others.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, and appeal from order dismissed. No opinion.
#### In the Matter of Probating the Last Will and Testament of Dora Fenner, Deceased. Marion E. Magoffin and Others, Appellants; Cortland O. Tinkham, as Executor, etc., of Dora Fenner, Deceased, Respondent.

Decree affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent payable out of the estate. All concurred.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00248-CR

LIONEL JAMES GONZALEZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-3763-16-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 21, 2018
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                 Total Control Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                      Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       March 31,
                                       ---------------------------------------
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) 
  PER SHARE:                              1996           1997           1998
                                          ----           ----           ----
<S>                                    <C>           <C>             <C>
Net income (loss) available 
  for common shareholders............. $ (608,964)   $(10,625,477)   $4,066,980
Interest on convertible debt,
  net of tax benefit..................          - (a)           - (a)         -
Net income (loss) adjusted for
  "as if converted" common stock
  equivalents......................... $ (608,964)   $(10,625,477)   $4,066,980
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------

Weighted average shares outstanding -
  Basic Shares........................  4,647,896       4,947,323     7,389,697

Dilutive effect of stock options......          - (a)           - (a)   180,300
Conversion of Class C Exchangeable
  common stock of subsidiary..........          -               - (a)   767,112
Conversion of subordinating 
  debentures..........................          - (a)           - (a)         -
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------
Diluted Shares Outstanding              4,647,896       4,947,323     8,337,109
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------

Basic earnings (loss) per share        $    (0.13)   $      (2.15)   $     0.55
Diluted earnings (loss) per share      $    (0.13)   $      (2.15)   $     0.49
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------
                                       ----------    ------------    ----------
</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of Percy L. Housel for License and Admission to Practice as an Official Examiner of Title.

Application granted and bond approved. Present—Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Rich, JJ.
#### Herman Joseph ACOSTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC PARISH COMMITTEE OF ST. BERNARD PARISH et al., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 16298.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 5, 1935.

J. Bernard Cocke and Bertrand I. Cahn, both of New Orleans, for appellants.

Lawrence W. Bergeron and John R. Perez, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded by counsel that the issues presented here cannot be distinguished from those which confronted the Supreme Court in the matter entitled Paul Adolph Brown v. Democratic Parish Committee of St. Bernard Parish et al., 165 So. 167, and in various other cases decided by the Supreme Court in the same opinion and decree rendered in the Brown Case on December 3, 1935.

For the reasons assigned by, the Supreme Court in that case, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Affirmed.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40514

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISMELDO VENTURA-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(M-95-CV-330)

 

January 23, 1998

Before GARWOOD, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Ismeldo Ventura-Gutierrez, federal prisoner #65009-079,

appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate,

set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

He avers that the government breached the plea agreement by failing

to file a motion for downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. §
1Ventura-Gutierrez’s motion for appointment of counsel is

denied.

2

5K1.1 and that his counsel was ineffective in recommending he plead

guilty. Ventura-Gutierrez also avers, for the first time in his

reply brief, that the district court erred in refusing to hold an

evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no

error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the

same reasons adopted by the district court. See United States v.

Ventura-Gutierrez, No. M-95-CV-330 (S.D. Tex. March 31, 1997).

AFFIRMED1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6020 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6020

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend certain 
   increases in payments for physicians' services under the Medicare 
                         program through 2022.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2021

 Mr. Bera (for himself and Mr. Bucshon) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend certain 
   increases in payments for physicians' services under the Medicare 
                         program through 2022.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Medicare Providers Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. EXTENDING CERTAIN INCREASES IN PAYMENTS FOR PHYSICIANS' 
              SERVICES UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM THROUGH 2022.

    (a) In General.--Section 1848(t) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-4(t)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``during 2021'' and inserting 
                ``during 2021 or 2022''; and
                    (B) by striking ``January 1, 2022'' and inserting 
                ``January 1, 2023''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(C)--
                    (A) in the header, by striking ``2021'' and 
                inserting ``2021 and 2022''; and
                    (B) by striking ``after 2021'' and inserting 
                ``after 2022''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1848(c)(2)(B)(iv)(V) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(c)(2)(B)(iv)(V)) is amended by 
striking ``2021'' and inserting ``2021 or 2022''.
                                 <all>
```