alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

** **

**P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Joseph A. Molino, Jr., certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P & F Industries, Inc.

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| August 13, 2003 |                        | /s/ Joseph A. Molino, Jr. |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Date            | Joseph A. Molino, Jr.       |                      |
|            | Principal Financial Officer |                      |

 

1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

August 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136393 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. COLLEEN WALLACE, Individually and as Stephen J. Markman, Personal Representative of the Estate of Justices 

Michael Wallace,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136393 

 COA: 282897 

Sanilac CC: 06-000076-MZ 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

POLICE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

t0806 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

August 8, 2008 

Clerk
Exhibit 99.2





STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick M. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/    PATRICK M.
MURPHYPatrick M. Murphy Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





August 13, 2002




1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

TODD FABIAN SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-3988 September 1, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 57

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
      limitation on the exclusion under section 911 of such Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Archer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar 
      limitation on the exclusion under section 911 of such Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON SECTION 911 EXCLUSION.

    (a) General Rule.--Subparagraph (A) of section 911(b)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on foreign earned 
income) is amended by striking ``$70,000'' and inserting ``$100,000''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustments.--Paragraph (2) of section 911(b) of such 
Code is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Inflation adjustments.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning in a calendar year after 1995, 
                the dollar amount contained in subparagraph (A) shall 
                be increased by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins 
                        by substituting `calendar year 1994' for 
                        `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                Any increase determined under the preceding sentence 
                shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $50.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
fn ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 07-0011 

IN THE MATTER OF CALLING A RETIRED 

DISTRICT JUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE 

JUN 0 8 2022 

Bowen Coreenwood 

Clert< of Supreme Court 

citat,p tkiinntana 

ORDER 

The Honorable Deborah Kim Christopher, Judge of the District Court for the 

Twentieth Judicial District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired 

District Judge Karen Townsend to assume jurisdiction of the Department 2 Calendar in 

Sanders County and Lake County as needed until July 15, 2022. 

Judge Townsend has retired under the provisions of the Montana Judges' 

Retirement System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), 

MCA, has advised that she is agreeable to assisting the Twentieth Judicial District Court 

with the above-listed matters. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Honorable Karen Townsend, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active 

service in the District Court of the Twentieth Judicial District of the State of Montana, to 

assume jurisdiction of and preside over the Department 2 Calendar in Sanders County and 

Lake County as needed through July 15, 2022, and is hereby authorized to proceed with 

any and all necessary hearings, opinions, and orders, including final resolution of said 

matters. 

2. For all active service, Judge Townsend shall be paid the salary compensation to 

which she is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be 

reimbursed. 

3. A copy of this Order shall be filed with the Clerks of Court of Sanders County 

and Lake County, with the request that this Order be publicly posted for all counsel of 

record in all cases scheduled for Department 2 on the above-listed dates. 

06/08/2022

Case Number: PR 07-0011
4. A copy of this Order shall also be furnished to the Honorable Deborah Kim 

Christopher, the Honorable Karen Townsend, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of the Supreme 

Court Administrator. 

This Order is entered by the Chief Justice pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(3) of 

the 1972 Montana Constitution, and statutes enacted in conformity therewith and in 

implementation thereof 

DATED this day of June, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

2
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                   ORION CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                   (UNAUDITED)



                                                            Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                                               September 30,             September 30,
                                                           ---------------------    ---------------------
(In millions, except for per share amounts)                 1999           1998      1999           1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic:
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>       <C>            <C>
Weighted average number of shares outstanding               27.2           27.2      27.1           27.4
                                                          ======         ======    ======         ======
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders   $  3.5         $  2.3    $(46.4)        $ 82.7
                                                          ======         ======    ======         ======
Net earnings (loss) per basic common shares               $ 0.13         $ 0.08    $(1.72)        $ 3.02
                                                          ======         ======    ======         ======
Diluted:
Computation of weighted average number of
   common and diluted equivalent shares
   outstanding:-
   Weighted average number of shares outstanding            27.2           27.2      27.1           27.4
   Dilutive effect of stock options and stock awards         0.4            0.7         -            0.7
                                                          ------         ------    ------         ------
   Weighted average number of common and
       diluted equivalent shares                            27.6           27.9      27.1           28.1
                                                          ======         ======    ======         ======
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders   $  3.5         $  2.3    $(46.4)        $ 82.7
                                                          ======         ======    ======         ======
Net earnings (loss) per diluted common shares             $ 0.13         $ 0.08    $(1.72)        $ 2.95
                                                          ======         ======    ======         ======
</TABLE>


         The  average  shares  for the nine  months  ended  September  30,  1999
excludes equivalent shares of 0.3 million in the computation of diluted earnings
per common share because to include them would have been antidilutive.
| **1** | **PURPOSE.** |
|-------|--------------|

| **2.** | **ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN.** |
|--------|---------------------------------|

----

| **3.** | **ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES AND OTHERS.** |
|--------|------------------------------------|

----

| **4.** | **STOCK.** |
|--------|------------|

| **5.** | **GRANTING OF OPTIONS OR AWARDS.** |
|--------|------------------------------------|

| **6.** | **MINIMUM OPTION PRICE; ISO LIMITATIONS.** |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|

----

| **7.** | **OPTION DURATION.** |
|--------|----------------------|

----

| **8.** | **EXERCISE OF OPTION.** |
|--------|-------------------------|

| **9.** | **TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.** |
|--------|--------------------------------|

----

| **10.** | **DEATH; DISABILITY.** |
|---------|------------------------|

| **11.** | **ASSIGNABILITY.** |
|---------|--------------------|

| **12.** | **TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS.** |
|---------|--------------------------------------|

----

| **13.** | **ADJUSTMENTS.** |
|---------|------------------|

----

----

| **14.** | **MEANS OF EXERCISING OPTIONS.** |
|---------|----------------------------------|

----

| **15.** | **STOCK AWARDS.** |
|---------|-------------------|

| **16.** | **TERM AND AMENDMENT OF PLAN.** |
|---------|---------------------------------|

| **17.** | **CONVERSION OF ISOs INTO NON-QUALIFIED OPTIONS;      TERMINATION OF ISOs.** |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| **18.** | **APPLICATION OF FUNDS.** |
|---------|---------------------------|

| **19.** | **GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION.** |
|---------|------------------------------|

| **20.** | **WITHHOLDING OF ADDITIONAL INCOME TAXES.** |
|---------|---------------------------------------------|

| **21.** | **NOTICE TO CORPORATION OF DISQUALIFYING DISPOSITION.** |
|---------|---------------------------------------------------------|

----

| **22.** | **GOVERNING LAW; CONSTRUCTION.** |
|---------|----------------------------------|

| **23.** | **SECURITIES LAWS.** |
|---------|----------------------|
#### In the Matter of The Opening of Essex Avenue; Hughes *et al.,*Respondents, v. A. S. Mermod, Appellant.

St. Louis Court of Appeals,

March 24, 1891.

1. Appeal: jurisdiction. An action for the condemnation of land for public uses involves title to land, so that an appeal therein lies to the supreme court.

*2893. -:-. When a constitutional question is properly raised upon the record of a cause, the supreme court has jurisdiction o£ an appeal in the cause ; and where the appeal is allowed to this court, the cause should be transferred to the supreme court, without inquiry whether there is any merit whatever to the question raised, or whether it is a mere sham.

*Appeal from the St. Louis County Circuit Court.*Hon. W. W. Edwards, Judge.

Transferred to the Supreme Court.

*Qeo. W.*Boyce, for appellant.

*John B. Warfield,*for respondents.

Rombauer, P. J.

The defendant in the circuit court asked that his appeal be sent to the supreme court, claiming that the cause involved title to real estate, and the construction of the constitution of this state. The circuit court denied such appeal, but granted the defendant an appeal to this court. The defendant now moves for the transfer of the cause to the supreme court, claiming, for the reasons above stated, that that court has jurisdiction of the appeal.

The proceeding is one to open a public road, and is the same which we had under consideration in *State ex rel. v.*Heege, 89 Mo. App. 49. Upon the subsequent trial of the cause in the county court, the defendant demanded a trial by jury of twelve men (to which he claimed he was entitled under the constitution), to determine the question of jurisdiction. That claim was denied by the court. In the circuit court, where the cause was tried *de nono,*the defendant waived a jury, but upon the hearing he presented two instructions, challenging the constitutional validity of the proceedings in the county court. These instructions were refused.

Under our recent ruling in *St. Louis, K. C. & C. Ry. Co. v. Lewright, ante,*p. 212; and *Musick v.*
      *290Railroad, 43 Mo. App. 326, the case involves title to real estate, as part of defendant’s land is sought to be condemned for public use. A constitutional question is also properly raised upon the record, and, under the decision of the supreme court in *State ex rel. v. St. Louis Court of*Appeals, 97 Mo. 276, it is not for us to inquire whether it has any merit whatever, or whether it is a mere sh?im. It is, therefore, our duty to transfer the cause to the supreme court, in order that it may determine the question of its own jurisdiction.

Ordered that the cause be transferred to the supreme court.

All the judges concur.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6243 

To prohibit Federal public benefits for or naturalization of any alien who 

receives a payment pursuant to an agreement to settle certain civil 

actions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. WEBER of Texas (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. 

LAMALFA, Mr. BABIN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. MCKINLEY, and Mr. ELLZEY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal public benefits for or naturalization of 

any alien who receives a payment pursuant to an agreement to settle certain civil actions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No More Free Ride 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6243 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING FEDERAL PUBLIC BENEFITS FOR AND 

2 NATURALIZATION OF CERTAIN ALIENS. 

3 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any alien 

4 who entered the United States unlawfully and receives a 

5 payment pursuant to an agreement to settle a civil action 

6 brought by the alien for any harm sustained by the alien 

7 as a result of enforcement of the immigration laws, shall 

8 be ineligible for any Federal public benefit (as such term 

9 is defined in section 401(c) of the Personal Responsibility 

10 and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 

11 U.S.C. 1611)) and naturalization as a citizen of the 

12 United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bonomble 1. Prodookl 

CoUfJtY AUditOr, @W6BtOa aOU?itY 

Gelve#ton, Teur 

Dear sir: 

Your letter 0 43, m8ardlag the 

camtul ettentlon: 

d to pertlolpato to 

Thl8 errountle 

ration with the State 

aounty iieoltb Tnft. 

,100 for 8anltarlan, 

d WOO for all other 

1, a oopy of rhioh ir l noloe8d 

t while the Leglelat?rre &sC. CB~O 

e establirh@ent of a heelth unit 

taln moh a unit. Likewins, ln Opinion So. 

that Liberty County war authorized t0 aooopt 

int end expend money for the aalntumnoe of e 

publla health unit. The ma a o n8 fo r tier o p inio ns l pply aquallg 

aa well to Celreeton County. 
xononblo 1. Pmdookl, w 8 

buildin& for the uw of the tani 1 

to p ur eha a 6w npalr d a 

, If l bunaing lr relad Boo*@- 

rrl by tha Coml~oloYra* Court, $r eontalaed ia Artiolo &351, 

Vemm*r Aaaoteted Clvll Statutes. W other thla&r, #la 

utlalo provide8 thnt’raoh oomiaolo#r’I* court l !dlr 

ja llr 

vrolldo aad keep la n 

a nd lll'#oorury pub1 r 

lr Oourthoun~, 

o baildingr.” 

:iiwefora bdtlre you that kln8ton County 18 

authorisrd*:o purohau uWmPo&l l bulld~ly~tor tb w of 

tha county Ewalth ‘Jnft lr tha Coml88loabrr* court en&o 8uoh 

8 buildln$ JLOO~8aary. 'f'lw purohaw mutt, oi oourn, be mda 

rma tha proper tund and k la oorpllaao~ with tha Bud& br, 

Aatat~951, 4hd Leglrlatun , Chapter 806 gate 539~ Art10168 

m GaBa-18, vernon*~ AnJlotatod c1.h stlstut68. 

Tour8 wry truly 

TC-s:sP:fCP 

no1. 

APP8ObTE 

ogle; Cgalttr~ 

. . ., ChaIrma
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                             508
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    13106
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      21241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37084
<PP&E>                                           66341
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   82912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            17640
<BONDS>                                          19413
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                       40112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     82912
<SALES>                                         101867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                101867
<CGS>                                            87357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    87357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3744
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1423
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        



</TABLE>