alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 12.1

                           JOHN Q. HAMMONS HOTELS, L.P
                  HISTORICAL RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (000's omitted)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   1997       1998        1999        2000         2001
                                                   ----       ----        ----        ----         ----
<S>                                              <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>
HISTORICAL EARNINGS:
Income (loss) before minority interest,
provision for income taxes, extraordinary
item and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle                             $ 8,791     $   338     $  (973)    $(2,422)   $(11,899)

Add:
Interest, amortization of deferred financing
fees and other fixed charges (excluding
interest capitalized)                             45,086      58,257      63,456      75,451      72,550
                                                  ------     -------     -------     -------    --------

   Historical earnings                           $53,877     $58,595     $62,483     $73,029    $ 60,651
                                                 =======     =======     =======     =======    ========

FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense and
 amortization of deferred
 financing fees                                  $44,325     $57,286     $62,209     $73,833    $ 70,975

Interest capitalized                              10,259       6,163       6,770         504           -

Interest element of rentals                          761         971       1,247       1,618       1,575
                                                 -------     -------     -------     -------    --------

   Fixed charges                                 $55,345     $64,420     $70,226     $75,955    $ 72,550
                                                 =======     =======     =======     =======    ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (A)              0.97        0.91        0.89        0.96        0.84
                                                 =======     =======     =======     =======    ========
</TABLE>

(A)  In computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings have been
     based on income from operations before income taxes and fixed charges
     (exclusive of interest capitalized) and fixed charges consist of interest
     and amortization of deferred financing fees (including amounts
     capitalized) and the estimated interest portion of rents (deemed to be
     one-third of rental expense).

                                       39
#### TANGIPAHOA BANK & TRUST CO. In Liquidation, v. Mrs. A. GUWANG.

No. 2577.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Oct. 6, 1943.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1943.

See 15 So.2d 616.

W. S. Rownd, of Hammond, for appellant.

C. Paul Phelps, of Ponchatoula, for ap-pellee.

OTT, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Tangipahoa Bank & Trust Co. in Liquidation v. Guwang and Tangipahoa Bank & Trust Co. in Liquidation v. Arthur et al., La.App., 15 So.2d 148.

It is ordered that the judgment herein appealed from be and the same is avoided, reversed and set aside, and it is now ordered that the above case be remanded to the City Court of Hammond to be proceeded with according to law and the views herein expressed; cost of the appeal to be paid by the defendant, and all other cost to await the final termination of the case.
Edwin Martin and Esther 

Martin, Individually and as 

Representative of the Estate of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2014

No. 04-13-00868-CV

FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER INC.,

Appellant

v.

Edwin MARTIN and Esther Martin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Robert 

Martin,

Appellees

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-12-26093-MCVAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. Appellees’ brief was originally due on March 13, 2014. 

On March 12, 2014, appellees requested an extension of time in which to file a brief, stating the 

parties had informally reached a settlement. This court granted the extension until April 14, 

2014. Neither the brief nor a second motion for an extension of time has been filed. 

On April 15, 2014, the clerk of this court contacted appellees and was informed that the 

parties were in the process of finalizing the settlement documents and would be filing a motion 

to dismiss. A motion to dismiss has not been filed.

Appellees are represented on appeal by Mr. Manuel C. Maltos. Mr. Maltos is hereby 

ORDERED to file, no later than May 19, 2014, a joint motion to dismiss or a motion for 

extension of time in which to file appellees’ brief. If Mr. Maltos files a motion for extension of 

time based upon the settlement negotiation, he must state in detail the status of the settlement 

negotiation and provide a date by which a motion to dismiss will be filed. If Mr. Maltos does not 

respond by May 19, 2014, this appeal will be set at issue without benefit of an appellees’ brief.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 775

To abolish the Board of Review of the Metropolitan Washington Airports

Authority, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1995

Mr. MORAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To abolish the Board of Review of the Metropolitan

Washington Airports Authority, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF BOARD OF REVIEW AND RELAT4 ED AUTHORITY.

5 (a) ABOLITION OF BOARD OF REVIEW.—Section

6 6007 of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of

7 1986 (100 Stat. 1783–379) is amended—

8 (1) by striking subsections (f) and (h);

9 (2) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub10 section (f); and
2

•HR 775 IH

1 (3) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection

2 (g).

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

4 (1) RELATIONSHIP TO AND EFFECT OF OTHER

5 LAWS.—Section 6009(b) of the Metropolitan Wash6 ington Airports Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 1783–384)

7 is amended by striking ‘‘or by reason of the author8 ity’’ and all that follows through the end of the sub9 section and inserting a period.

10 (2) SEPARABILITY.—Section 6011 of the Met11 ropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 (100

12 Stat. 1783–385) is amended by striking ‘‘Except as

13 provided in section 6007(h), if’’ and inserting ‘‘If’’.

14 (c) PROTECTION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS.—Actions

15 taken by the Airports Authority and submitted to the

16 Board of Review pursuant to section 6007(f)(4) of the

17 Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 before

18 April 1, 1995, shall remain in effect and shall not be set

19 aside solely by reason of a judicial order invalidating cer20 tain functions of the Board of Review.

21 (d) AMENDMENT OF LEASE.—The Secretary of

22 Transportation shall amend the lease entered into with the

23 Airports Authority under section 6005(a) of the Metro24 politan Washington Airports Act of 1986 to secure the
3

•HR 775 IH

1 Airports Authority’s consent to the amendments made by

2 this Act.

3 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF RESERVED PARKING AREAS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective 30 days after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act, the Airports Authority shall

6 not provide any reserved parking areas free of charge to

7 Members of Congress, other Government officials, or dip8 lomats at Washington National Airport.

9 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act, the

10 terms ‘‘Airports Authority’’, ‘‘Washington National Air11 port’’, and ‘‘Washington Dulles International Airport’’

12 have the same meanings as in section 6004 of the Metro13 politan Washington Airports Act of 1986.

14 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS IN OTHER LAW.

15 Any reference in any Federal law, Executive order,

16 rule, regulation, or delegation of authority to the Board

17 of Review of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Au18 thority or the provisions of law repealed under this Act

19 is hereby repealed.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010, each of the undersigned, Lawrence J. LeBon, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John LeBlanc, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, III                       
|                      |  |     |  | Lawrence J. LeBon, III                           
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ John LeBlanc                                 
|                      |  |     |  | John LeBlanc                                     
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
J-S64036-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

DONALD HAGNER

Appellant No. 1132 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence June 27, 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-26-CR-0002011-2013

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., BENDER, P.J.E., and LAZARUS, J.

MEMORANDUM BY GANTMAN, P.J.: FILED OCTOBER 24, 2014

Appellant, Donald Hagner, appeals from the judgmen t of sentence

entered in the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas , following his guilty

plea to four (4) counts of aggravated indecent assa ult and one (1) count of

corruption of minors. 1 We affirm.

In its opinion, the trial court fully sets forth t he relevant facts and

procedural history of this case. Therefore, we hav e no reason to restate

them.

Appellant raises two issues for our review:

IS IT UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO REQUIRE...APPELLANT TO

REGISTER FOR A LIFETIME WHEN SAID REGISTRATION

____________________________________________

1 18 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 3125(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(7), (a)(8) , and 6301(a)(1),

respectively.J-S64036-14

- 2 - REQUIREMENT EXCEEDS THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM

PENALTY FOR APPELLANT’S OFFENSE?

IS THE ADAM WALSH STATUTE UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN

REQUIRING...APPELLANT TO REGISTER FOR A LIFETIME?

(Appellant’s Brief at 7).

Pennsylvania law states that registration requirem ents under the

Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act ( “SORNA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A.

§§ 9799.10-9799.41, do not constitute criminal puni shment.

Commonwealth v. McDonough , 96 A.3d 1067 (Pa.Super. 2014). In

McDonough , this Court rejected the argument that mandating c ompliance

with SORNA by offenders, who have served their maxi mum term, is

unconstitutional. Id.

After a thorough review of the record, the briefs of the parties, the

applicable law, and the well-reasoned opinion of th e Honorable Gerald R.

Solomon, we conclude Appellant’s issues merit no re lief. The trial court

opinion discusses and properly disposes of the ques tions presented. ( See

Trial Court Opinion, filed July 28, 2014, at 2-4) ( finding: registration

requirements imposed by SORNA are remedial, not pun itive; registration is

properly characterized as collateral consequence of defendant’s plea;

application of registration requirements is not lim ited by factors which

control imposition of sentence; offender who has se rved maximum term can

still be required to comply with SORNA registration requirements; thus,

application of lifetime registration under SORNA to Appellant is notJ-S64036-14

- 3 -

unconstitutional). Accordingly, we affirm on the b asis of the trial court

opinion.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 10/24/2014Circulated 10/14/2014 03:38 PMCirculated 10/14/2014 03:38 PMCirculated 10/14/2014 03:38 PMCirculated 10/14/2014 03:38 PM
Exhibit 10.6.15.3



|     |  |  |  |                                                              
|---- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | 717 Texas Avenue Suite 1000 Houston, Texas 77002 713-830-2000

February 11, 2008

Mr. Gregory Doody

717 Texas Avenue

Houston,
Texas 77002

Dear: Mr. Doody

As you are
aware, on May 15, 2006, Calpine Corporation (Calpine) and its debtor affiliates (collectively, the Debtors) received Bankruptcy Court approval of the Emergence Incentive Plan (the EIP), which provides
variable cash awards to approximately select senior employees. Pursuant to the terms of the EIP, an incentive pool will be created according to certain metrics related to the valuation of Calpine both under the Debtors plan of reorganization
and based on market value during a certain period after the effective date of the plan (the EIP Pool), which, once created will be distributed to eligible employees solely at my discretion as chief executive of Calpine.

As communicated to you earlier, you have been chosen to be a participant in the EIP. This letter confirms my final intentions regarding distribution
under the EIP. Accordingly, as of the date hereof, you are eligible to receive 8.6% of the Executive EIP Pool and 75.4% of the Chief Risk Officer Pool once the EIP Pools are funded.

This proposed distribution percentage is a final and binding decision and cannot be altered except in the event that you are terminated by Calpine for
Cause or you voluntarily terminate without Good Reason, in which case you will forfeit any right to any distribution from the EIP Pool. You will remain eligible to receive the proposed distribution set forth herein if you
resign for Good Cause or are terminated without Cause. The distribution out of the EIP Pool is expected to be made around May 9, 2008.

I believe the Emergence Incentive plan recognizes and rewards our efforts toward a successful exit from bankruptcy. Fortunately for all of us, our combined efforts created a higher than expected adjusted enterprise
value which will result in payments from the EIP that are more than competitive.

I look forward to our continued shared success. Should
you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

/s/ Robert P. May

Robert P. May

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sloud, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gene Sokolov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Date:  August 12, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Gene Sokolov  
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | Gene Sokolov           
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

Dated: August 15, 2008.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. E8-19279 Filed 8-15-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
EXHIBIT 21.1



                        SUBSIDIARIES OF EQUITY INNS, INC.



                                                           Jurisdiction of
Name                                                  Incorporation/Organization
----                                                  --------------------------
Equity Inns Trust                                            Maryland
Equity Inns Services, Inc.                                   Tennessee
Equity Inns TRS Holdings, Inc.                               Tennessee
Equity Inns Partnership, L.P.                                Tennessee
Equity Inns Partnership II, L.P.                             Tennessee
Equity Inns/West Virginia Partnership, L.P.                  Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation                                    Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership I, L.P.                            Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation II                                 Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership II, L.P.                           Tennessee
EQI/WV Financing Partnership, L.P.                           Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation III                                Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership III, L.P.                          Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation IV                                 Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership IV, L.P.                           Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation V                                  Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership V, L.P.                            Tennessee
EQI/WV Financing Corporation                                 Tennessee
EQI/WV Financing Partnership II, L.P.                        Tennessee
E. Inns Orlando, Inc.                                        Tennessee
E.I.P. Orlando, L.P.                                         Tennessee
ENN Company, Inc.                                            Tennessee
ENN Leasing Company, Inc.                                    Tennessee
ENN Leasing Company I, L.L.C.                                Delaware
ENN Leasing Company II, L.L.C.                               Delaware
ENN Leasing Company III, L.L.C.                              Delaware
ENN Leasing Company IV, L.L.C.                               Delaware
ENN Leasing Company V, L.L.C.                                Delaware
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.31
AMENDMENT
Lockheed Martin Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan
Lockheed Martin Corporation Nonqualified Capital Accumulation Plan


Effective as of the date below, Article IV(4) of the Lockheed Martin Corporation Nonqualified Capital Accumulation Plan and Article V(3) of the Lockheed Martin Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan are hereby amended to strike the sentence “Any amount distributed from a Participant’s Account shall be credited with earnings (or losses) through the date that is four (4) business days before the date on which the distribution is processed.” in order to clarify that earnings under these plans are credited in same manner applicable to the corresponding qualified plan.
                
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
By:/s/ Jean A. Wallace
___________________________


Jean A. Wallace
Acting Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Date: 12/18/2019
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-1788
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DENISE D. CANTY, Defendant - Appellant, and TERESA SAUNDERS-WIGGINS; INGRID SAUNDERS; GEORGE H. SAUNDERS, JR.; ARETHA BENJAMIN, as Mother and Next Friend of Quentin B. Saunders, a Minor; BEVERLY POWELL SISK, Guardian ad litem for Quentin B. Saunders, minor, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-19-3) Submitted: May 29, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Denise D. Canty, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin Pasternak, Sherry Susan Laird, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, New York, New York, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her claim as a beneficiary to life insurance proceeds. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm as modified. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) brought this interpleader action in district court against the five children ofGeorge Saunders, a deceased federal employee. Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act of 1951 (FEGLIA), the decedent was covered under a group policy issued by MetLife to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). See 5 U.S.C. § 8701-16(1994). The Appellant was a named beneficiary in two forms; however, as the district court correctly concluded, both forms were invalid. See 5 U.S.C. § 8705(a); see also Ward v. Stratton, 988 F.2d 65, 67 (8th Cir. 1993). We therefore affirm the districtcourt’s order but modify it to reflect the denial of the Appellant’s motion for summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED