alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
175 La. 357

#### STATE v. BROWN.

No. 31918.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 20, 1932.

Gaston L. Poterie, Atty. Gen., and Eugene Stanley, Dist. Atty., and Niels F. Hertz, Asst. Dist. Atty., and J. Bernard Cocke, all of New Orleans, for the State.

Henry J. Rhodes, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

ROGERS, J.

Defendant was convicted of forgery and uttering as true, and was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for not less than one year and not more than three years.

After defendant was sentenced, the state filed an information under Act No. 15 of 1928, charging defendant with having been convicted and sentenced in the state of Alabama for the crime of “ ‘Forgery in the Second Degree,’ a felony under the law of Louisiana,” and prayed that defendant’s sentence be annulled and that he be resentenced as a second offender.

Defendant moved to quash the information. His motion was sustained, and the state appealed.

The trial judge assigned’ the following reasons for.sustaining the motion to quash, viz.;

> “In order to subject the defendant to a double penalty in accordance with section 1 of Act No. 15 of 1928, it is necessary that it be shown that he was previously convicted of a felony within this State, or convicted of a crime elsewhere, which if committed within this State would be a felony.

> “Under the forgery statutes of our State, only those instruments which are therein named can be made the subject of forgery.

> “The information merely charges that the defendant was convicted in the State of Alabama of ‘Forgery in the Second Degree.’ The court cannot assume that the instrument which was the basis of defendant’s conviction in Alabama could be made the subject of forgery, and' therefore a felony in the State of Louisiana, especially in view of the fact that the Alabama Statute, which counsel for the State read to the court during the argument, names as possible objects of forgery writings which are not named in the Louisiana forgery statutes.

> “There is no offense known in the State of Louisiana by the name of ‘Forgery in the Second Degree,’ and the information fails to allege that the definition of this term comprises any of the species of forgery prohibited in the State of Louisiana.

> “The information cannot support a judgment declaring that the defendant was convicted in the State of Alabama of fraudulently making a false writing of any of the instruments which may be made the subject of forgery in the State of Louisiana.

> “The State did not move to amend the information, nor to particularize, nor to administer proof.”'

We see no error in the ruling.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Raj Rajeswaran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 28th day of May, 2010.









| |     |                                                           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                           
| | BY: | RAJ RAJESWARANRaj Rajeswaran, 
Principal Executive Officer

































---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      35,852,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,435,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (451,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 20,650,303
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            87,048,253
<PP&E>                                      97,136,116
<DEPRECIATION>                            (54,363,287)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,303,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,621,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,595,447
<OTHER-SE>                                  99,566,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,303,770
<SALES>                                     84,088,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            85,644,946
<CGS>                                       69,421,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               69,421,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,068,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                61,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,093,949
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,676,853
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,417,096
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,417,096
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
### M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 1 of CAMERON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 14th day of May,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Valley Regional Medical Center, Appellant,

v.

Maria Guadalupe Camacho Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00004-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2013-CCL-488)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 31st day of August, 2015.

Cecile Foy Gsanger, CLERK
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2014

h0922 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2014

148805(15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148805

COA: 319355

Wayne CC: 09

- 024170

- FC

MARK DEWITT YANCEY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 29, 2014

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SECTION OF THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,029,270
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          28,353
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        45,883
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,103,506
<COMMON>                                        85,474
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      192,717
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             77,452
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 355,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           436,725
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  39,677
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   31,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     15,130
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   522
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 224,809
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,103,506
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      113,025
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            17,205
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      48,467
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      65,672
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         47,353
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 197
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  47,550
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        20,379
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,171
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   27,171
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,645
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          64,416
<EPS-BASIC>                                     27,171
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   27,171


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1


 


		CAPELOGIC INCORPORATED

Providing Technology Solutions for Financial Services


1 Windhaven Court, Monroe
Twp, NJ 08831 


Telephone: (609) 448-7930 Fax:
(973) 206-9430 


Web: www.capelogic.com


 


February 21, 2020


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.


8100 E. 22nd St. North, Building 800


Suite 102


Wichita, KS 67226


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 1956 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-230879 for the above captioned Fund and acknowledge that Capelogic, Inc. is currently acting
as the independent pricing agent for the Fund. Subsequently, we hereby consent to the reference of Capelogic, Inc. as independent
pricing agent.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Capelogic, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ SALMAN AHMAD
	 	 	Salman Ahmad
	 	 	Treasurer
OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  EXHIBIT 11.    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

For the three and nine months
ended July 31, 1998 and 1997                 Three Months       Nine Months
(Amounts in thousands,                     ---------------    ---------------
except per share amounts)                  1998       1997    1998       1997

Basic Shares:
Average common shares outstanding         12,009     10,372   11,169   10,076

Net Income                                $3,421     $1,994   $7,816   $4,414

Less dividend on preferred stock                       (141)             (568)

Net income applicable to common stock     $3,421     $1,853   $7,816   $3,846

Net income per common share, basic         $0.28      $0.18    $0.70    $0.38

Diluted Shares:

Average common shares outstanding         12,009     10,372   11,169   10,076
Dilutive effect of employee stock options    537        763      653      498
Potential dilution of preferred stock         *         *        *         *
                                          ------     ------   ------   ------
                                          12,546     11,135   11,822   10,574

Net income applicable to common stock     $3,421     $1,853   $7,816   $3,846
Add back dividend on preferred stock          *         *        *         *

Net income for calculating
  diluted earnings per share              $3,421     $1,853   $7,816   $3,846


Net income per share, diluted              $0.27      $0.17    $0.66    $0.36

*Anti-dilutive
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated May 14, 2014 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting included inthe Annual Report of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2014. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form S-8 (File No.333-136168, File No. 333-157356, File No. 333-176849 and File No. 333-191416). 

/s/ Grant Thornton India LLP 

Mumbai, India 

May 14, 2014
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Tel Group, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Date: April 15, 2011
By: /s/ George AlvarezGeorge Alvarez, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**ANNUAL
      CERTIFICATION**


Re:
                    Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-4SL (the "Trust"), issued
                    pursuant
                    to the Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
                    by and among Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital I. Inc, as depositor
                    (the
                    "Depositor"), LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee (the
                    "Trustee"), GMAC Mortgage Corporation, as interim servicer (the
                    "Interim
                    Servicer"), and Wachovia Equity Servicing LLC (successor by merger
                    to
                    HomEq Servicing Corporation), as servicer (the "Servicer")
  I,
        William T. Fowler, Vice President, of the Wachovia Equity Servicing, LLC
        (successor by
        merger
        to HomEq Servicing Corporation), hereby certify to the Depositor and the Trustee
        and their officers, directors, and affiliates, pursuant to Section 3.22 of
        the Servicing
        Agreement, that:
  A
        review
        of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2006 to
        November 1, 2006, or the applicable portion thereof, and, to the best
        of
        my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
        its
        obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material
        respects for the period of January 1, 2006 to November 1, 2006.
  Date:  
        Feb 23, 2007
  /s/
        William T. Fowler
 William
        T. Fowler
 Vice
        President








Morgan
      Stanley Officer's Certificate


MSM
      2006-4SL
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor
         International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June
         30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
         date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward F. Cooke, Chief Financial Officer
         of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  August 15, 2005
        ---------------

By: /s/ EDWARD F. COOKE
    --------------------------------
    Edward F. Cooke
    Chief Financial Officer

                                    Page 38
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust,
            Series 2006-C (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
      JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee and The Bank of New York, as
      Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ---------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6161 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily reinstate the 

employee retention credit for employers subject to closure due to COVID19. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia (for herself, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. 

HERN, and Ms. SEWELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily 

reinstate the employee retention credit for employers subject to closure due to COVID-19. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Retention 

5 Tax Credit Reinstatement Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6161 IH

1 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY REINSTATEMENT OF EMPLOYEE RE2 TENTION CREDIT FOR EMPLOYERS SUBJECT 

3 TO CLOSURE DUE TO COVID-19. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3134 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (as amended by section 80604 of the 

6 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c)(5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

8 the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period 

9 at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘, 

10 and’’, and by adding at the end the following new 

11 subparagraph: 

12 ‘‘(C) which, with respect to such calendar 

13 quarter, is not described in subclause (I) or (II) 

14 of paragraph (2)(A)(ii).’’, and 

15 (2) in subsection (n), by striking ‘‘October 1, 

16 2021 (or, in the case of wages paid an eligible em17 ployer which is a recovery startup business, January 

18 1, 2022)’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2022’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to calendar quarters beginning 

21 after September 30, 2021. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS