alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN P & F INDUSTRIES, INC.'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         251,728
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,183,970<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 23,895,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,390,866
<PP&E>                                      18,419,720
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,555,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,208,037
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,265,337
<BONDS>                                      7,120,976
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,643,893
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,565,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,298,037
<SALES>                                     20,685,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,796,956
<CGS>                                       14,402,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,402,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             334,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,734,007
<INCOME-TAX>                                   657,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,077,007
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,077,007
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 8.1




SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





Port Wing Development Co., Ltd. (“e-Channels BVI”), incorporated in the British Virgin Islands


Ahead Billion Venture Ltd. (“Sihitech BVI”). incorporated in the British Virgin Islands


Beijing Yuxinyicheng Technologies Ltd. (“Yuxinyicheng”), incorporated in the PRC


Beijing e-Channels Century Technology Co., Ltd. (“e-Channels”) , incorporated in the PRC


Beijing Sihitech Technology Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Sihitech”), incorporated in the PRC


Beijing Sihitech Software Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Software”), incorporated in the PRC


Shanghai Sihitech Technology Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Sihitech”), incorporated in the PRC


Shanghai Yuxinyicheng Software Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Software”), incorporated in the PRC


Beijing Yuxinyicheng Information Technology Limited (“Yuxinyicheng Information”), incorporated in the PRC


Beijing Yuxinhengsheng Information Technology Limited (“Sunrisk”) , incorporated in the PRC


Beijing Easycon Electronics Limited (“Easycon”) , incorporated in the PRC


Chengdu Recency Technologies Limited (“Recency”) , incorporated in the PRC


ChengduYuxinyicheng Technologies Ltd. (“Chengdu Yuxinyicheng”), incorporated in the PRC


Shanghai Fujie Business Consulting Limited (“Fujie”) , incorporated in the PRC


Beijing Yuxinyicheng Software Co. , Ltd. (“Yuxinyicheng Software”) , incorporated in the PRC


Guangzhou Yuxinyicheng Information Technology Limited (“Guangzhou Yuxinyicheng”) , incorporated in the PRC


Xiamen Yucheng Technology Limited (“Xiamen Yucheng”), incorporated in the PRC


Tianjin Yuxinyicheng Technology Limited (“Tianjin Yuxinyicheng”), incorporated in the PRC
EX-35 (f)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 15, 2007

Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc.
Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-AF1

Per Section 3.16(a) of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
3/1/2006, the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities
Administrator), hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or
portion thereof:


(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function
     Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of any such Servicing Function
     Participant, in all material respects throughout such year or portion
     thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in
     any material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer
     and the nature and status thereof.



Certified By:
/s/ Reid Denny
Reid Denny, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, David Weissberg, M.D., certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CytoCore, Inc.;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;(4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and(5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.         /s/ David Weissberg, M.D.   David Weissberg, M.D.   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27.2

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH FLOWS AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                      4,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,417
<PP&E>                                           2,061
<DEPRECIATION>                                     849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           50,074
<BONDS>                                         27,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,016
<OTHER-SE>                                    (80,248)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (40,232)
<SALES>                                         28,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,522
<CGS>                                           23,309
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    43
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    206
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                206
<DISCONTINUED>                                (11,785)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### George WILLIAMS, Jr., v. BANK OF MORGAN CITY & TRUST CO. in Liquidation et al.*

No. *1422.*

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 14, 1935.

C.' A. Blanchard, of Morgan City, for appellant.

Wise & Wise and J. Y. Gilmore, all of Morgan City, for appellees.

*

 Rehearing denied June 29, 1935. Writ of error refused Aug. 30, 1935.

EDWARD T. WEEKS, Judge

ad hoc.

This case is similar in facts and as to the principles of law applying thereto, to the case of Watkins v. Bank (La. App.) 162 So. 262, this day decided and the same reasons given in the Watkins Case apply equally here.

Hence, for. the reasons given in the said case of J. S. Wátlcins.v. the same defendant, it is hereby decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; costs in the trial court and also costs 'of appeal are to be paid by plaintiff.'

ELLIOTT, J., dissenting for reasons stated, 162 So. 265.

LE BLANC,’J., recused;
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

             In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MapInfo Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Mark P. Cattini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

             (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

             (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**P&F INDUSTRIES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Richard A. Horowitz    |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
| Richard A. Horowitz         |   |
| Principal Executive Officer |   |
| November 11, 2005      |   |

 

1

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0577 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RUSSELL DEAN KORTAN,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 26, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0577
18505.

#### O’Kelley *v.*Jackson.

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

This case being an action in ejectment, brought by the petitioner to recover land derived by the defendant from a life tenant, the will under which both parties claim title disclosing that the petitioner, as a grandchild of the testator, received title in fee to the lands in question with a life interest in said property to his father which was subject to a forfeiture, that “should any child or children sell or move away from said lands, then and in that event, the income from the share of any such child shall be equally divided among *540the remaining children . . . until the death of such child or children, when said share shall become the property of their children in fee simple,” and the undisputed evidence showing that the life tenant sold the fee, the defendant claiming through this chain of title, and this action being filed within a seven-year period after the death of the life tenant — the verdict was demanded in favor of the petitioner, and the court did not err in directing such verdict. See Code §§ 113-806, 85-708; *Sproull*v. *Graves,*194 *Ga.*66 (20 S. E. 2d 613); *Patterson*v. *Patterson,*208 *Ga.*17, 20 (64 S. E. 2d 585); *Aiken*v. *Aiken,*209 *Ga.*819 (76 S. E. 2d 481).

Submitted March 8, 1954

Decided April 14, 1954.

*B. F. Duncan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Orrin Roberts, Roberts & Roberts, Allison & Pittard,*contra.

2. It follows that the court did not err in refusing to grant the motion for new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eddie Sandoval Soto, * From the 91st District Court

of Eastland County,

Trial Court No. 23382

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00022

- CR * July 16, 2015

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and McCall, sitting by

assignment)

(Bailey, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the appeal is dismissed.
First Department,

February, 1909.

#### Annie Brown, Respondent, *v.*Nettie Herzberg, Appellant.

*Practice*— *dismissal of complaint*— *unreasonable delay.*

Appeal from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 16th day of October, 1908, dismissing the complaint unless plaintiff complied with the terms therein mentioned.

Per Curiam:

The defendant made out a case which required the granting of the motion to dismiss the complaint unless a reasonable excuse was presented by' the plaintiff for the delay. . We can find no such excuse in the papers submitted. ■The evidence shows that in consequence of the delay the defendant will be unable to produce upon' the trial her most important and material witnesses. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
**Exhibit 7**

**Consent of Independent Auditor**

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Reporton Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited of our report dated March 8, 2013, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Annual Report. 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (No. 333-165730, 333-168835 and 333-170873) of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited of our report dated March 8, 2013 referred to above. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Interests of Experts,”which appears in the Annual Information Form filed as Exhibit 1 attached to this Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants 

Toronto, Ontario 

March 8, 2013
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





The
      Board
      of Directors


Sonic
      Solutions:




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
      333-103624, No. 333-102396, No. 333-73412, No. 333-66187, and No. 333-112523)
      on
      Forms S-8 and S-3 of Sonic Solutions of our report dated June 29, 2005, with
      respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Sonic Solutions and subsidiaries
      as
      of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
      shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of
      the years in the two-year period ended March 31, 2005, and the related financial
      statement schedule, which reports appear in the March 31, 2006, annual report
      on
      Form 10-K of Sonic Solutions.






/s/
      KPMG
      LLP




San
      Francisco, California


June
      13,
      2006
#### Harold Nichols v. State.

*No.*24567.

January 11, 1950.

*Milburn, Milburn & Milburn,*and *Mike R. Mason,*all of Odessa, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for sodomy. The penalty assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction.

It appears from the record that Mr. H. E. Biehl resided in Ector County, Texas, and was employed by the Arrow Drilling Company. He had a very young female calf in his barn on the night in question; that about 10:45 P. M., after he had retired for the night, his wife called him and told him that she heard the calf bawling; that he went out to the barn with a lantern; that when he entered the barn he saw the calf lying down and its rear end was all bloody; that he had three barrels in the barn which were covered with a canvas; that he saw a couple of feet protruding from under the canvas; that after his son *127appeared on the scene, whom he had called, the person came out from under the canvas; that this person was the defendant; that when he came out from under the canvas his pants were off and his B.V.D.’s were bloody. The foregoing is, in substance, the testimony adduced by the state.

Appellant did not testify or offer any defense. There is no evidence from any source what caused the blood on the calf or where it came from. The witness could not be positive that what he saw on appellant’s B.V.D.’s was blood, however, he thought so. Assuming that appellant caused the bloody condition of the calf, this is not enough without some fact or circumstance that it was due to an act of copulation by appellant with the animal in question. That the state’s case rests entirely upon circumstantial evidence is obvious. This being true, we do not believe the circumstances exclude every other reasonable hypothesis except the guilt of appellant. See Langford v. State, 48 Tex. Cr. R. 561, 89 S. W. 830; Mullins v. State, 45 Tex. Cr. R. 465, 76 S. W. 560; and Dewberry v. State, 80 Tex. Cr. R. 514, 191 S. W. 1164. The facts do not prove a crime was committed and amount to nothing more than a strong suspicion in favor of the charge made. The state should have had the animal examined to prove penetration, or the part from which the blood came. Had this been done the facts and circumstances might have been sufficient to support a finding that appellant was the guilty party.

Having reached the conclusion that the evidence is insufficient to justify and sustain appellant’s conviction, the judgment of the trial court, is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack M. Laskowitz, as Chief Financial Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Paradise, Inc.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                                       |  |                       |  | 
| |  | ------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ Jack M. Laskowitz                 |  | Date: August 13, 2010 |  | 
| |  | Jack M. Laskowitz                     |  |                       |  | 
| |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |  |                       |  |