alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State, ex rel. Miller et al., *v.*Guthery, Dir. of Agriculture, et al.

(No. 23582

Decided November 30, 1932.)

*604*Messrs. Culbert & Culbert,*for relators.

*Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, and *Mr. William J. Ford,*for respondents.

Day, J.

This petition fails to show that the director of finance first certified that there was a balance in the appropriation out of which was to be paid the obligation involving the expenditure of public money in the contract relied on by the relators.

It is true that there is an averment “that the money required to pay for said premises is and was in the treasury of the state of Ohio and not appropriated for any other purpose.” This does not meet the requirements of Section 2288-2, General Code, which provides :

> “It shall be unlawful for any officer, board or commission of the state to enter into any contract, agreement or obligation involving the expenditure of *605money, or pass any resolution or order for the expenditure of money, unless the director of finance shall first certify that there is a balance in the appropriation pursuant to which such obligation is required to be paid, not otherwise obligated to pay precedent obligations.”

We hold this to be mandatory. *State*v. *Kuhner & King, Partners,*107 Ohio St., 406, 140 N. E., 344. It is the ministerial duty of the director of finance to make the required certificate. *State, ex rel. S. Monroe & Son Co.,*v. *Baker, Dir. of Finance,*112 Ohio St., 356, 147 N. E., 501.

It not appearing on the face of the petition that Section 2288-2, General Code, has been complied with, it becomes our duty to sustain the demurrer upon that ground. Other grounds of the' demurrer were argued by counsel, but it is sufficient to say that they are defensive in character and might be pleaded in an answer. The demurrer to the petition will be sustained.

*Demurrer sustained.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 47

To require approval by law of agency rules and regulations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. TAYLOR of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require approval by law of agency rules and regulations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulatory Relief and

5 Reform Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AGENCY RULES REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED BY

7 LAW.

8 (a) APPROVAL REQUIREMENT.—Section 553 of title

9 5, United States Code, is amended—

10 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding

11 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘except to the extent’’
2

HR 47 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘except that subsections (b), (c), (d),

2 and (e) do not apply to the extent’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(f) A rule or regulation shall not be effective unless

5 it is approved by law.’’.

6 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub7 section (a) shall apply to—

8 (1) a rule or regulation issued in final form

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act; and

10 (2) a rule or regulation issued in final form be11 fore the date of the enactment of this Act, if the

12 first effective date of the rule or regulation occurs

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Pfii $£.- st I /I I 4<HMfk\ l£a^UBTOFCRil APR 06 2015 i . r ^ •» n i Alb@*testa,Gferk



### Has, hi*. foiO£& az /h-ftc&^i ~R> Ternswit± ~rh -ft? &»«*-£a <T<?/.,*)- y>r< (?**>**«- <&£< &/&*** s4r>'7 ~72x*S ^nePn yyi^ni £*de S.^J^^-. gbL.1>rt-tet<zi dum-l &fAi*n <fuA~'£j/h-ljr:* s)£-fc*L 'Tlxm $hh Je^Ukt-t 

### gS&7*2$ &J6-D. U£*da* /£?& #<; szi J&di ^ -pit- ^ 47./1 T^X/^S &6o£Ar, Sn^l &&J± &.<{.&&(- ^2 /5lT^ ^/S7^/ 

### ft\jft£\$ \Ax\lhm\ /}>*Wu) Al/*^~ vW'ScSvci^ 3<P }*£4kW-T£W***=J ^.x/h wtt*«'t JuiT*J<^'<r~ aP ^rhe /s-r^^D/^-fe^ daleifTW/fe/c/ <3au/tf<Ji4Alt,dfc{f<rv\ &&Y1 $»%/? £>£ <?x<i/c4S7l>6. , App£//aMyMi4 QfrCrnts\ 

### JW«*dic4><?>% of All Mi'ffn^{ f&b&teJr-nip ,at)J £<»rt<\Mvs, <*xC*pi~ 7n dfi£s>£ hy <pl*. davsJ-l-h/'tn eg. erfhe/l //»*)$ cm &s>?te <?-/#<-*<< 4jkiaT, "fkitktdaf,3c 

### /Qj*l7hr'sf««J</j£>drf> <DfsJ*£-J' <2ou*/ (JmJ^ «^*// fiAVi: <fh*. pdco&C CUuiJ- &£ Ct)*IU/i dau^fy u)s.tt &<f /J#k*/^ (U/ifujSc //-'on. ttiL<T oa ~7Z* <d*<J<jp. G&S^rd (Uuit Ins /Vt)4 -S«j(>jn*4*efi &> ^£/)^6^ <~pe> -Vis. "7V^<{W UL);lf>+m finctt£*~i All"* ^h UJoUtfJ-n, *<f' ^Jg&nenjfrt/\ 75>a^ da<de cr-p.^J/ttminAl (rM<2<*&tn&s, d£<L'3„(k^ S>(&> £/cf) ^&L<k&>*."fll'S T& r«£<i«J 'fh* j£-T ^df^ *<f''- Afi/ZiI #»cl <U);//,/htf 

### 0(L7*t 4*«a.~h $«cf k),./lim $7iJe*x< AJ/*» //m£ fceaj^cse M>l*d£. 

### WiL)t CxP /lfit*AS' &&?«*> *»^ /J#* 0>££&*rt{*J ",4 72» T^re (huidr* JO/~//s**n /4h-c/*£*o -A//+n u>*s Mi/ j^J^-f^J Usr\4c'l . 

### £*(riAmb<nL iff <*eo? fl-l J/d.d-lArt. &* ScpHaiU*!; I 2co% <Ju/U'mc1/^ 0)3Z, faijtn. &2>«snJtf csr) <Tht c&5iWl&i<$*j *r>^bt*(\p£.!l &»<* T^bd6m\o^.r 

### (J)^>/fAtjetk (ku-Yify cm fbz JZ'st/yl&vdtej ^^-^U^A/^y Khd SiphmUc, (^^:US*M^d*iei^.wft2&sf/fl&>iJ*Q'5!* OAr\u/»/jy fine) \j«»id.focf <fh£ C&>\$i;U\~i(<!r>~*. And ^Ptt ^Z^^&aI i4uj$ e^P (fth gfc>k: S>&-

©<f fg<XA$ 0 3? /-/&0?£. "77i>\5 ^J't//fl*/&£o£/t germ^ ;/"^>/ a//ffj^ foctiL* C?if^S/nrvts- ^Z U&Cf /)/&£. yfrn^ yfitffttn. cpctsz/,&-*s 3?/*»'/1 />£ hfirpcj 73 S~mc&fi./^ Si//12 & ^4iH*cl &k M- %$£ 7212 /?*>c^X <J,6<, /^so /£#& d^/^6<0,c4lc^ 7*«-f -ZCnAAcahrs. fhd Th*. t5"0& 1D/s/<<l( (Loua+ 

### QD~rti44ii &4*ttfs ^pon -/•/* <&<th -&+•/ -ihz <h*<t*jf Ttuff-y n7it fasg /)A<,

p/t &*Afc<Si;^ti^ TW*<f>c£o

llS,ll/>R«KQnd&s«J A//*n dWf<; l>\*-\ ThK A&ua4- Takers Q,<l[ssil. I&tk a4 ~ft>?S Vl<$J/i/i<<h~ Q-P TSXftS, derxsJ'A/'** Avid' fftUTS- LQilh+r* Ahd&*#> All*** 

### 1h*& lifvt-A 'lOf,t <fn)%k\vtl firK0 IVfA^lh j?|?. .£«<-/ dfyr\ w( £?/* \\ $&(p£&4'£}/Af 

### Of ill I£o/^
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48003-48004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11353 and <greek-i> 11354]


Texas Disaster Number TX-00297

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1780-DR), dated 07/31/2008.
    Incident: Hurricane Dolly.
    Incident Period: 07/22/2008 and continuing through 08/01/2008.
    Effective Date: 08/01/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/30/2008.

[[Page 48004]]

    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/01/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:
    U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement 
Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Texas, dated 07/31/2008 is hereby amended 
to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 07/22/
2008 and continuing through 08/01/2008.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-18916 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 3, 2020

No. 04-19-00793-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Tanya WALKER and Adrian Segovia,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI23121

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On February 20, 2020, in response to a joint motion filed by the parties in this case, this 

court suspended the deadlines in this appeal for 60 days to give the parties time to mediate and 

consider settling the underlying case. The parties have filed a joint motion, requesting an 

additional 60 days, which is until June 19, 2020, to advise this court of the status of their 

mediation and settlement efforts. The joint motion notes the parties are scheduled for mediation 

for April 28, 2020. 

This is an accelerated appeal from an order denying a plea to the jurisdiction. 

Consequently, the parties’ joint motion is granted in part. We order the parties to file, by May 20, 

2020, either a motion to dispose of this appeal in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure or a response explaining why such a motion has not been filed.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of March, 2020.
___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6132 

To reauthorize the COPS grant program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Mr. NEHLS (for himself, Mr. YOUNG, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. MAST, Mr. ROUZER, 

Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. BOST, Mr. GARCIA of California, Mr. MURPHY

of North Carolina, and Mr. FALLON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the COPS grant program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public Safety En5 hancement Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF COPS. 

7 Section 1001(a)(11) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

8 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

9 10261(a)(11)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6132 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

2 ‘‘$1,047,119,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 

3 through 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘$5,547,119,000 for 

4 each of fiscal years 2022 through 2026’’; and 

5 (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting 

6 ‘‘$4,500,000,000 shall be used only for the hiring 

7 and retention of law enforcement officers. Of the re8 maining amount,’’ before ‘‘up to 3 percent’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of MEDITE Cancer Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michaela Ott, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that, to my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of the dates presented and the results of operations
of the Company for the periods presented.



| |  | /s/
    Michaela Ott   
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | Michaela Ott           
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | Dated:  May 20, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6159 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6159

  To prohibit Federal funds for any State, local, Tribal, or private 
 entity that operates or controls an injection center in violation of 
 section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856; commonly 
              referred to as the ``Crack House Statute'').

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2021

Ms. Malliotakis (for herself, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Garbarino, 
Mr. Katko, Mr. Jacobs of New York, Mr. Reed, and Ms. Tenney) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                               and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit Federal funds for any State, local, Tribal, or private 
 entity that operates or controls an injection center in violation of 
 section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 856; commonly 
              referred to as the ``Crack House Statute'').

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defund de Blasio's Injection Sites 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. NO FEDERAL FUNDS FOR ENTITIES OPERATING UNLAWFUL INJECTION 
              CENTERS.

    No Federal funds may be made available to any State, local, Tribal, 
or private entity that operates or controls an injection center in 
violation of section 416 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
856; commonly referred to as the ``Crack House Statute'').
                                 <all>
```
#### William H. McCord v. Thompson-Starrett Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Stephen P.
Jackson, Jr., certify that this annual report on Form 10-K of Remington Arms
Company, Inc., to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. Date: March
30, 2009

/s/ Stephen P. Jackson, Jr.Stephen P. Jackson, Jr.Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Corporate Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 11
 RTW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Statement Regarding Computation of Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
 2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    
    
    5,114,243
    
    
    
    5,233,326
    
    
    
    5,399,468Stock warrants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Stock optionsOptions at $10.75
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    200Options at $9.87
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    453Options at $9.50
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    323Options at $8.81
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6,276Options at $8.75
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    106Options at $6.50
    
    
    
    
    
    
    613
    
    
    
    4,528Options at $6.45
    
    
    
    
    
    
    479
    
    
    
    3,664Options at $6.18
    
    
    
    
    
    
    11,976
    
    
    
    53,569Options at $6.00
    
    
    
    
    
    
    10,415
    
    
    
    41,128Options at $5.33
    
    
    41
    
    
    
    239
    
    
    
    Options at $4.50
    
    
    259
    
    
    
    1,498
    
    
    
    2,513Options at $3.80
    
    
    2,189
    
    
    
    10,916
    
    
    
    15,679Options at $3.13
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6,700
    
    
    
    8,661Options at $2.60
    
    
    4,507
    
    
    
    10,140
    
    
    
    5,085Options at $2.42
    
    
    30,535
    
    
    
    9,574
    
    
    
    Options at $2.20
    
    
    6,915
    
    
    
    13,477
    
    
    
    15,683Options at $2.19
    
    
    53,098
    
    
    
    73,726
    
    
    
    53,390Options at $2.00
    
    
    1,005
    
    
    
    476
    
    
    
    Options at $1.98
    
    
    83,592
    
    
    
    103,317
    
    
    
    51,883Weighted average common and common
share equivalents outstanding
    
    
    5,296,384
    
    
    
    5,486,872
    
    
    
    5,662,609Net income (loss) ($000s)
    
    $
    6,999
    
    
    $
    9,941
    
    
    $
    5,998Income per share:Basic income per share
    
    $
    1.37
    
    
    $
    1.90
    
    
    $
    1.11Diluted income per share
    
    $
    1.32
    
    
    $
    1.81
    
    
    $
    1.06
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gary Cope, Chief Executive Officer of Orko Silver Corp. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 26, 2007





/s/  Gary Cope

Gary Cope

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
Exhibit
23.1





Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of Arotech Corporation:




Ann
Arbor, Michigan




We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.
333-153487) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-160717, 333-146752, 333-124960, 333-86728 and
333-59902) of Arotech Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2010, relating
to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Arotech Corporation appearing in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.







/s/ BDO Seidman,
LLP


BDO
Seidman, LLP


Grand
Rapids, Michigan


March 31,
2010
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 81

   To oppose Cuba's admission as a member of international financial 
                             institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Diaz-Balart introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To oppose Cuba's admission as a member of international financial 
                             institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES OPPOSITION TO CUBAN MEMBERSHIP IN 
              INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct each United States 
executive director to an international financial institution to use the 
voice and vote of the United States to oppose the admission of Cuba as 
a member of such institution until Cuba holds free and fair 
internationally-supervised elections and commits to compensate United 
States persons for property expropriated in Cuba.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,666
<SECURITIES>                                    14,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,127
<INVENTORY>                                     32,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,391
<PP&E>                                         104,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,135
<BONDS>                                         33,316
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,970
<SALES>                                        134,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,109
<CGS>                                           86,051
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,671)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,562)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00497-CV

University of Texas System, Appellant

v.

Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission and Mario O. Kapusta, M.D., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN204598, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant University of Texas System no longer wishes to pursue its appeal and has

filed a motion to withdraw its appeal. The University’s certificate of conference states that it

conferred with counsel for appellees Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission and Mario O.

Kapusta, M.D., who are unopposed to the motion. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: September 13, 2005
#### People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Archie Teycial, (Impleaded), Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,997.

First District, Second Division.

July 7, 1966.

Ronald S. Lopaty, of Chicago, for appellant; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer G. Kissane and William J. Nellis, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

PRESIDING JUSTICE BRYANT.

Not to be published in full.