alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6321]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Art and Power in the Central African Savanna,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Menil Collection, Houston, TX, from on or about September 26, 2008, until on or about January 4, 2009, Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, OH, from on or about March 1, 2009, until on or about June 7, 2009, Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, from on or about June 28, 2009, until on or about October 11, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: August 11, 2008.

C. Miller Crouch,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E8-18951 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.2(b)



March 5, 1997


American Paging, Inc.
Suite #3100
1300 Godward Street NE
Minneapolis, MN 55413

Re: Revolving Credit Agreement dated January 1, 1994, as amended (the
    "Revolving Credit Agreement"), between American Paging, Inc. ("API") and
    Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. ("TDS")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    This letter will constitute TDS's agreement to amend the Revolving Credit
Agreement, effective January 1, 1997, by changing all references to
"$150,000,000" in the Revolving Credit Agreement to "$180,000,000."  All other
terms and conditions of the Revolving Credit Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

    TDS also hereby waives all defaults or events of defaults by the Company
under the Revolving Credit Agreement resulting from the violation of the
covenant in Section 7(b)(2) of the Revolving Credit Agreement or the insolvency
of the Company from the respective dates from any such default or event of
default through January 1, 1999.

    Please acknowledge your agreement to this amendment by executing a copy of
this letter and return it to the undersigned.

                        Very truly yours,

                        TELEPHONE AND DATA SYSTEMS, INC.


                             By:     /S/ MURRAY L. SWANSON
                                -----------------------------------
                                Murray L. Swanson
                                Executive Vice President - Finance


Accepted and agreed to as of the date set forth above.

                             AMERICAN PAGING, INC.


                             By:     /S/ DENNIS M. BESTE
                                ------------------------------------
                                Dennis M. Beste
                                Vice President - Finance, Chief
                                Financial Officer and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1763-DR]


Iowa; Amendment No. 15 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1763-DR), dated May 27, 2008, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 27, 2008.

    Appanoose, Monroe, and Ringgold Counties for Individual 
Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance.)
    Clarke County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance.
    Wayne County for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-19009 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Second Quarter Report of OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 5, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas W. Hyde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  July 23, 2003 | By: | /S/ DOUGLAS W. HYDE                 
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                     
|                     |     | Douglas W. Hyde                     
|                     |     | Chairman of the Board, President    
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and Director





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and will be retained by OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6026 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6026

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the 
 introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of 
   food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2021

Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the 
 introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of 
   food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Keep Food Containers Safe from PFAS 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FOOD PACKAGING CONTAINING INTENTIONALLY 
              ADDED PFAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(fff)(1) The introduction or delivery for introduction into 
interstate commerce of food packaging containing intentionally added 
PFAS.
    ``(2) The term `PFAS' means a perfluoroalkyl substance or a 
polyfluoroalkyl substance that is man-made with at least 1 fully 
fluorinated carbon atom.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
beginning on January 1, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
18484.

#### Ross *v.*Griffin *et al.*

Argued February 8, 1954

Decided March 8, 1954.

Hawkins, Justice.

1. While this court is without original jurisdiction, and cannot hear evidence or pass upon disputed issues of fact raised by a motion to dismiss a bill of exceptions and a valid denial of the allegations thereof, where, as in this case, the motion to dismiss recites that, by virtue of the power contained in a certain security deed executed by Mittie Ross, the within plaintiff in error, to St. Elmo Harrison, on January 14, 1950, recorded in Deed Book 64, page 110, in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Grady County, Georgia, to secure an indebtedness of $1,236.03, which was transferred to Mary Louise Griffin Perry on February 14, 1952, the property involved in this litigation was sold on the first Tuesday in November, 1953, to Elaine J. Griffin, which statements of fact are not directly denied by the opposite party, such statements will be taken as time in passing on the motion. *Colston*v. *Youmans,*208 *Ga.*669 (1) (68 S. E. 2d 898).

2. “This court will in no case undertake to pass upon questions presented by a bill of exceptions, when it affirmatively appears that, even if the judgment of the court below were reversed, the plaintiff in error would derive no benefit from the adjudication.” *Davis*v. *Jasper,*119 *Ga.*57 (45 S. E. 724). See also *Major*v. *City of Atlanta,*198 *Ga.*303 (31 S. E. 2d 727).

3. It appearing from the record in this case that the questions involved concerned a deed from Mittie Ross to Mary Louise Griffin Perry, dated February 14, 1952, and recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Superior Court, Grady County, in Deed Record Book 69, page 423, to the same land which was sold on the first Tuesday in November, 1953, by virtue of the power contained in a prior security deed, executed by the plaintiff in error on January 14, 1950, and duly recorded, and that the plaintiff in error was thereby divested of any title to or interest in the land involved, and would not derive any benefit from the adjudication, even if the judgment of the trial judge were reversed, the questions presented by the bill of exceptions are therefore moot, and the writ of error must be dismissed. *Colston*v. *Youmans,*208 *Ga.*669 (68 S. E. 2d 898).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*437
      *Erie M. Donalson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Conger & Conger, J. Willis Conger,*contra.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 632

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 13, 1995

Received

DECEMBER 21, 1995

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used

by the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JUST COMPENSATION.

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 1498(a) of title 28,

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end of
2

•HR 632 RFS

1 the first paragraph the following: ‘‘Reasonable and entire

2 compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs,

3 including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attor4 neys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent

5 inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had

6 no more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-

7 year period preceding the use or manufacture of the pat8 ented invention by or for the United States. Reasonable

9 and entire compensation described in the preceding sen10 tence shall not be paid from amounts available under sec11 tion 1304 of title 31, but shall be payable subject to such

12 extent or in such amounts as are provided in annual ap13 propriations Acts.’’.

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

15 subsection (a) shall apply to actions under section 1498(a)

16 of title 28, United States Code, that are pending on, or

17 brought on or after, January 1, 1995.

Passed the House of Representatives December 12,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Certification

         I, Susan Mills, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all
reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Mortgage
Loan Trust 2006-HE1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

          2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

          3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
servicing and other information required to be provided under
Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in
the Exchange Act periodic reports;

          4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
the servicing agreement; and

          5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their
related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

          In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably
relied on information provided to me by the following
unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Option One
Mortgage Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
and Citibank, N.A.

                                   Date March 30, 2007
                                   CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN
                                   TRUST INC.

                                   By: /s/ Susan Mills
                                   ------------------------
                                   Name: Susan Mills
                                   Title: Vice President
                                   Date: March 30, 2007
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cytocore, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert McCullough, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition as of the dates presented and the results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.





/s/ Robert F. McCullough, Jr.Robert F. McCullough, Jr.Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial OfficerDated:  August 15, 2011
18518.

#### ATHA *v.*ATHA.

Submitted March 8, 1954

Decided April 14, 1954.

*541
      *A. M. Kelly, Wm. L. Preston,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. E. Briscoe, Jr.,*contra.

Sutton, Justice.

1. The first special ground of the amended motion for new trial complains that the court erred in failing to give in charge to the jury any legal definition of cruel treatment, by which they might judge the character of acts that would be sufficient to drive a wife from her husband’s home.

Where a suit is brought for permanent alimony, based on a bona fide state of separation under Code §§ 30-210, 30-213, and the wife complains that she was compelled to leave her husband’s home on account of cruel treatment, the most important part of the court’s instructions must necessarily relate to the character of the acts and the conduct on the part of the husband which the jury would be authorized to find amounted to cruel treatment. *Durham*v. *Durham,*156 *Ga.*454, 456 (7) (119 S. E. 702). • A reading of the entire charge in the present case fails to show airy standard by which the jury would be guided in their effort ■to determine whether the acts upon the part of the husband amounted to cruel treatment under the law of this State. It follows that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury as to what would constitute such cruel treatment as would justify the wife in leaving her husband’s home and thereby bring about a state of separation so as to entitle her to permanent alimony.

*5422. Under the pleadings and evidence, there was no issue as to thé husband being the head of the family, and the trial judge did not err, as complained of in the second special ground of the motion, in failing to charge the jury that the husband in this State is the head of the family, and as such has the right to fix the matrimonial residence without the consent of the wife.

3. The third special ground complains that the court erred in failing to charge the jury on the law as to when permanent alimony shall be granted. The judge instructed the jury: “Under our law alimony is an allowance out of the husband’s estate made for the support of the wife when living separate from him. It is the duty of the husband in this State to support his wife, when living together and also when living separately, suitable and according to his ability and condition in life unless the wife has forfeited the claim she has on her husband for support by her own misconduct.” If further instructions were desired as to when permanent alimony shall be granted, a timely written request therefor should have been made. This ground of the motion is without merit.

4. Since a new trial is granted on account of the failure of the trial judge to give to the jury any legal definition of cruel treatment, as ruled in division 1 of this opinion, and since the evidence may not be the same on another trial, it is not necessary to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 72-6267.

#### Briggs et al. *v.*Ohio Savings & Trust Co. et al.

Ct. App. Ohio, Tuscarawas County. Certiorari denied.