alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. George S. Churchill, a Minor, by Ora C. Churchill, His Guardian.

Brown, Wheeler, Brown & Hat, attorneys for appellant.

Fred H. Snyder and Grant & Grant, attorneys for appellee.

Opinion per Curiam.

This suit is like Northwestern Life Insurance Company v. Ora C. Churchill, in which we have filed an opinion stating our reasons for reversing the judgment; to which we refer as containing our reasons for the same judgment entered in this case.

The judgment of the City. Court is reversed and the cause remanded to that court with directions to sustain the demurrer to the replication to the pleas of the defendant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         834,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,162,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,262,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,626,797
<PP&E>                                      10,940,332
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,316,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,402,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,541,726
<BONDS>                                      5,210,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,978,867
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,671,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,402,137
<SALES>                                     19,722,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,861,131
<CGS>                                       12,602,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,602,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,386,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                   538,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            848,512
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   848,512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.2




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   
    As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the use of our report, dated
February 13 1997, on the financial statements of Orgenics Ltd. included in this
Form 10-K/A, and to the incorporation of our report into Selfcare, Inc.'s
previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-37961, 333-45535,
333-15583, 333-17855 and 333-45523, as amended.
    

                                        KOST,FORER AND GABBAY
                                        CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS (ISRAEL)
                                        A MEMBER OF ERNST & YOUNG INTERNATIONAL


   
April 12, 1999
Tel-Aviv, Israel
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0100 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 14, 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0100
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4282 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4282

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 
to make a technical correction relating to the provision of Department 
          of Defense assistance to local educational agencies.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4282

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 
to make a technical correction relating to the provision of Department 
          of Defense assistance to local educational agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
              ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.

    Section 386(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1993 (Pub. L. 102-484; 20 U.S.C. 7703 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``section 8003(a)'' and inserting ``section 
        8003(a)(1)''; and
            (2) by striking ``(20 U.S.C. 7703(a))'' and inserting ``(20 
        U.S.C. 7703(a)(1))''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his or her capacity as an officer of ViewPoint Financial Group (the Company) that the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

|Date:  March 20, 2007 |  |  | **/s/ Garold R. Base**Garold R. BasePresident and Chief Executive Officer                  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                      |  |  |                                                                                            | 
|Date:  March 20, 2007 |  |  | **/s/ Pathie E. McKee**Pathie E. McKeeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 803 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 803

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the credit 
                  for increasing research activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1995

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. Matsui, Mr. Herger, and 
  Mr. Neal) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the credit 
                  for increasing research activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR INCREASING RESEARCH ACTIVITIES MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to credit for increasing research activities) is amended by 
striking subsection (h).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (1) section 28(b) of such Code 
is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after June 30, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
Termination
Agreement 


 


THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on May 28,
2013 between and among the following parties:


 


Ms. Haijuan Xu;


 


And


 


Le Wang Limited (“Le Wang”);


 


And


 


Beijing Lianhe Chuangxiang Advertising
Co., Ltd. (“Beijing Lianchuang”);


 


And


 


Galaxy Strategy & Communications
(Beijing) Management Co., Ltd. (“Galaxy Beijing”);


 


And


 


Galaxy Strategy & Communications
Inc. (“GSC”);


 


And


 


Strategy & Communications (Hong
Kong) Group Limited (“SCG”).


 


WHEREAS:


 


Parties to this Agreement
have entered into a series of agreements on July 8, 2011 as follows (collectively, the “Original Agreements”):


 


		1.	Exclusive Consulting Services Agreement between Galaxy Beijing and Beijing Lianchuang;



 


		2.	Agreement for Exclusive Purchase Right between and among Galaxy Beijing, Ms. Haijuan Xu and Beijing
Lianchuang;



 


		3.	Equity Pledge Agreement between and among Galaxy Beijing, Ms. Haijuan Xu and Beijing Lianchuang;



 


		4.	Letter of Authorization by Ms. Haijuan Xu in relation to Beijing Lianchuang and her interest in
it;



 


		5.	Agreement to Issue Shares between and among Ms. Haijuan Xu, Le Wang, Beijing Lianchuang, Galaxy
Beijing and GSC; and



 


		6.	Deed of Non-competition Undertaking by Ms. Haijuan Xu in favor of Beijing Lianchuang and SCG.



 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties
hereto, also being parties to the Original Agreements (the “Parties” and each a “Party”),
hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Termination of the Original Agreements. Upon termination, all responsibilities and obligations
of the Parties under the Original Agreements shall cease to have effect immediately, except for the confidentiality obligations
provided for in the Original Agreements;



 




    	1



    	 



    

 


		2.	Ms. Haijuan Xu will continue to work with and provide assistance as a consultant to GSC. Le Wang
must return 115,200 ordinary shares held by it to GSC for cancellation, whilst keeping and continuing to hold the remaining ordinary
shares of GSC; and



 


		3.	The Parties confirm that except as provided in this Agreement, neither Party shall have any further
liability, claim or other request, responsibility, or obligation to the other.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement
has been executed in six (6) copies by or on behalf of the Parties hereto on day and year first above written. Each Party holds
one of the six originals, each of which will be of equal force and effect.


 




    	2



    	 



    

 


	Haijuan Xu	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Signature	 
	 	 


 


	Le Wang Limited	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Signature 	 
	Name:	 
	Title:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Beijing Lianhe Chuangxiang Advertising Co., Ltd.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Signature and seal	 
	Name:	 
	Title:	 
	 	 
	Galaxy Strategy & Communications (Beijing) Management Co., Ltd.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Signature and seal	 
	Name:	 
	Title:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Galaxy Strategy & Communications Inc.	 


 


	 	 
	Authorized Signature 	 
	Name:	 
	Title:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Strategy & Communications (Hong Kong) Group Limited 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Signature 	 
	Name:	 
	Title:	 


 




    	3
EXHIBIT 15







October 23, 1996




Orion Capital Corporation
600 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited
interim financial information of Orion Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995, as
indicated in our report dated October 23, 1996; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on the information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 2-65348 on
Form S-8 and S-16 relating to the Orion Capital Corporation 1976 and 1979
Stock Option Plans, No. 2-80636 on Form S-8 relating to the Orion Capital
Corporation 1982 Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan, No. 2-63344 on
Form S-8 relating to the Orion Capital Corporation Employees' Stock
Savings and Retirement Plan and No. 33-59847 on Form S-8 relating to the
Orion Capital Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE


Hartford, Connecticut






                                 Page 26
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sonic Solutions (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Doris, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    | 



In connection with the Annual Report
of Sonic Solutions (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, A. Clay Leighton, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 20, 2011 

d0713 

Order 

 

July 20, 2011 

142388 & (105) 

YOLANDA JOHNSON, Successor Personal 

Representative of the Estate OF VERA 

JACKSON, Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142388 

 COA: 293304 

Wayne CC: 08-123817-NH 

DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, HARPERHUTZEL HOSPITAL, ANDRE R. NUNN, M.D., 

and DETROIT SURGICAL SPECIALISTS, 

P.C., d/b/a Detroit Bariatrics, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2010 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**P & F INDUSTRIES,INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Richard A. Horowitz     |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Horowitz         |
| Principal Executive Officer |
| August 13, 2003             |

 

1

----
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3927

___________ Allen Ray Bishop, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Donnie Threet, Deputy; * Bob Ross, Sheriff, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 27, 2002 Filed: March 4, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Allen Ray Bishop, a former inmate at the Crawford County Detention Center in Van Buren, Arkansas, appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference. Upon-2- de novo review of the record, we conclude that summary judgment was proper. See Larson v. City of Fergus Falls , 229 F.3d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review); Keeper v. King , 130 F.3d 1309, 1314 (8th Cir.1997) (to prove deliberate indifference, plaintiff had to show defendants knew of, yet disregarded, excessive risk to his health); Sanders v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. , 984 F.2d 972, 975 (8th Cir. 1993) (respondeat-superior-based claim “is not cognizable under § 1983”). Further, the district court did not commit a gross abuse of discretion affecting the fundamental fairness of the proceedings by refusing to compel discovery. See Stuart v. Gen. Motors Corp. , 217 F.3d 621, 630 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit










SHUTTERSTOCK, INC.
Empire State Building
350 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor
New York, NY 10118


Jon Oringer
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX




Re:     AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


Dear Jon:


This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Severance and Change in Control Agreement, dated September 24, 2012 between you and Shutterstock, Inc., as successor to Shutterstock Images LLC, (the “Severance Agreement”) is entered into on February 11, 2020, by and between you (referred to hereinafter as the “Executive” or “you”) and Shutterstock, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and shall be effective as of April 1, 2020. 


Capitalized terms utilized but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Severance Agreement. 


In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, you and the Company hereby agree that the Severance Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided: 


		
	1.
	Section 6(g)(i) is amended and restated to read as follows: 




A material reduction of Executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities, relative to Executive’s duties, authority or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction; provided, however, that not being named the Executive Chairman of the acquiring corporation following a Change in Control of the Company will not constitute Good Reason;


Except as amended hereby, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the valid and binding obligation of the parties thereto.  




[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, have caused this Amendment to Severance Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date written above.




SHUTTERSTOCK, INC. 


By: /s/ Heidi Garfield
    
Name:    Heidi Garfield


Title: General Counsel




EXECUTIVE


/s/ Jon Oringer
Jon Oringer
| **$100,000.00** | **November 1, 2004** |
|-----------------|----------------------|

----

----

|   | (a)    | (a) waive demand, presentment, protest, notice      of protest, notice of dishonor, diligence in collection, notice of nonpayment      and all notices of a like nature; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (b)    | to (i) the release, surrender, exchange or      substitution of all or any part of the security for the indebtedness evidenced      by this Note, or the taking of any additional security, (ii) the release      of any or all other persons from liability, whether primary or contingent,      for the indebtedness evidenced by this Note or for any related obligations,      and (iii) the granting of any other indulgences to any such person. |

----

----

----

----

|   | DIAYSYS CORPORATION                                                |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                               |
|   |                                                               |
|   | By: S/ JEFFREY B. AARONSON                                    |
|   |       Jeffrey B. Aaronson,      President |
|   |                                                               |