alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 15
                                                                    ----------

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P. 


November 13, 1996



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:

             Re:  Pacific Bell Registration Statement on Form S-3
             ----------------------------------------------------

We are  aware that our  report dated  November 13, 1996  on our review  of the
interim financial information  of Pacific Bell and Subsidiaries  for the nine-
month  period  ended  September  30,  1996  included  in  this  Form  10-Q  is
incorporated by reference in the Company's registration statement as follows:

            Form S-3:  Pacific Bell $1.575 Billion Debt Securities
            ------------------------------------------------------

Pursuant to Rule 436(c)  under the Securities Act of 1933,  this report should
not be considered  a part of the registration  statement prepared or certified
by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


Very truly yours,




/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael L. Heider, Vice President Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/S/ MICHAEL L. HEIDER                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|Michael L. Heider                                            
|Vice President Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|July 23, 2004                                                



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and will be retained by OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Clean Power Concepts, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|     |                                                                                                                                                      
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  | The Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|    
|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
|    



| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/Cory Turner         
| | Name:  | Cory Turner            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | September 28, 2009     



| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/Ralph Proceviat     
| | Name:  | Ralph Proceviat        
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | September 28, 2009     



---
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports  included  in this  Form  10-K,  into  the  Company's  previously  filed
Registration  Statements  File Nos.  33-97072,  33-97074,  33-87940,  333-07333,
333-26759, 333-56109, 333-79989, 333-79991 and 333-79993.




                                        /s/ Arthur Andersen, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March  29, 2000
Sarbanes-Oxley Certification


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

   1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of  Lehman XS Trust 2006-5, (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted
in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report
under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed
in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Citibank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent; Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company, as Custodian; LaSalle Bank National Association, as Custodian;
U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Custodian; First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas LP, as
sub-contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC; Newport Management Corporation,
as sub-contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC.


     Dated:    March 30, 2007

By : /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    --------------------------------------------------------
         E. Todd Whittemore
         Executive Vice President
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHNATHAN SHARON, DOC #H53271, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4306 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 11, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and J.L. "Ray" LeGrande, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2871]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

August 12, 2008.
    A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to this petition must be filed by September 4, 2008. See 
section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions have expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of High-Cost Universal Service Support (WC 
Docket No. 05-337) Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC 
Docket No. 96-45).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19180 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
18304.

#### Conley Housing Corporation *v.*Coleman, Tax Commissioner, *et al.*

Submitted September 14, 1953

Decided October 13, 1953

Motion to Vacate Judgment denied November 12, 1953.

*Rollins & Lucas, Arthur Rollins, Jr., Wm. E. Lucas,*for plaintiff in error.

*Broadus B. Zellars, Wm. II. Reynolds, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, George E. Sims, Jr., Assistant Attorney-General, John W. Wilcox, Jr.,*contra.

Head, Justice.

1. The rule providing for reasonable notice to the opposite party or his counsel and an opportunity to be heard on the question as to whether or not a bill of exceptions is correct before certification by the trial judge (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 735; Code, Ann. Supp., § 6-908.1) was not intended to, and does not, in any way modify, limit, or repeal the requirement for service of the bill of exceptions after it has been certified. Code § 6-911; *Mauldin*v. *Mauldin,*203 *Ga.*123, 124 (45 S. E. 2d 818).

2. In the present case counsel for the defendants in error approved “the foregoing bill of exceptions as correct and complete as to the facts herein stated.” On the next day the judge of the superior court certified the bill of exceptions. Clearly the acknowledgment signed by counsel was in accord with the rule requiring notice and an opportunity to be heard (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 735; Code, Ann. Supp., § 6-908.1), and was not an acknowledgment of service or waiver of service of the bill of exceptions, as provided by the Code, §§ 6-911, 6-912. It follows that this court is without jurisdiction of the writ of error and it must be dismissed. *Irwin*v. *LeCraw,*206 *Ga.*702 (58 S. E. 2d 383), and cases cited.

*Writ oj error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

On Motion to Vacate.

It is insisted that the clerk of the trial court failed to send up a certificate of service of the bill of exceptions, and that this certificate is now before this court. Had the alleged unverified certificate of service been attached to the bill of exceptions, it would have been insufficient to confer jurisdiction, and the writ of error would necessarily have been dismissed. See *Ivey*v. *McWilliams,*178 *Ga.*760 (174 S. E. 354); *Sistrunk*v. *Lipscomb-Weyman-Connors Co.,*179 *Ga.*48 (175 S. E. 12); *Ginn*v. *Ginn,*202 *Ga.*292 (42 S. E. 2d 923). After a bill of exceptions has been dismissed for want of service, it is too late for counsel to *220waive service and agree that the case may be heard under Code § 6-911 (3).

*Motion denied.*

*All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., not participating.*
#### Beatrice Tranter, Respondent, v. Sefton Tranier, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ June 12, 2014

ERRATA

______________________ Appeal No s

. 2013

- 1245
, - 1246
, - 1247

ALLERGAN, INC. , AND DUKE UNIVERSITY,

v.

APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC. , AND HI- TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.,

.

Decided: June 10, 2014

P recedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change s:

“Of counsel were L UKE T. S HANNON and H ARVEN V. D E S HIELD , Locke Lord LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for Ap otex Inc., et al.” to “Of counsel were L UKE T. S HANNON and H ARVEN V. D E S HIELD , Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illinois .”
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean E. Belanger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Sean E. Belanger                            
|------------------------------------------------
|Sean E. Belanger                                
|Chairman , President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: October 29, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

p0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146233

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146233

COA: 305006

Saginaw CC: 10-033800-FH

PETER ALFRED PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
              18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
              ---------------------------------------------


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Melvin S.
Gordon, as Chief Executive Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of Paradise, Inc.



       /s/ Melvin S. Gordon            Date:  May 15, 2006
       -----------------------------
       Melvin S. Gordon
       Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Exhibit










__________, 2019
Citibank, N.A., as Administrative
  Agent for the Lenders party
  to the Credit Agreement
  referred to below
Building #3 
1615 Brett Rd.
New Castle, Delaware 19720
Attention:  Bank Loan Syndications
Aon plc
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the Five Year Credit Agreement dated as of October 19, 2017 (as amended or modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement") among Aon plc, Aon Corporation, as borrowers, the Lenders (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent for the Lenders (the "Administrative Agent").  Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning unless otherwise defined herein, and all references to Sections herein are references to Sections of the Credit Agreement.
Pursuant to Section 2.22(b), the Lender named below hereby notifies the Administrative Agent as follows:
The Lender named below desires to extend the Facility Termination Date with respect to its Commitment for a period of one year, expiring October 19, 2023.
This notice and is subject in all respects to the terms of the Credit Agreement, is irrevocable and shall be effective only if received by the Administrative Agent no later than September 27, 2019.
Very truly yours,
[NAME OF LENDER]
By:                    
Name:
Title:
240 So.2d 699

#### In re Ralph BLACKMON and Jimmy Cox v. STATE. Ex parte Ralph Blackmon and Jimmy Cox.

5 Div. 908.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 5, 1970.

Paul J. Hooton, Hooton & Hooton, Roanoke, for petitioner.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., opposed.

McCALL, Justice.

Petition of Ralph Blackmon and Jimmy Cox for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Blackmon v. State, 46 Ala.App. 274, 240 So.2d 696 (5 Div. 5).

Writ denied.

SIMPSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH and MADDOX, JJ., concur.
FILED

September 30, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

AUGUST 1997 SESSION

RICKY D. HULSEY, )

)

Appellant, ) C.C.A.No. 01C01-9609-CC-00399

)

vs. ) Lincoln County

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Honorable Charles Lee, Judge

)

Appellee. ) (Post Conviction)

)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

HERSHELL D. KOGER JOHN KNOX WALKUP

Attorney at Law Attorney General & Reporter

P.O. Box 1148

Pulaski, TN 384781 EUGENE J. HONEA

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Justice Division

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

MICHAEL W. McCOWN

District Attorney General

WEAKLEY E. BARNARD

Assistant District Attorney General

P.O. Box 904

Fayetteville, TN 37334

OPINION FILED: ____________________

AFFIRMED - RULE 20

CURWOOD WITT 

JUDGE
2

OPINION

The petitioner, Ricky D. Hulsey, appeals the Lincoln County Circuit

Court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The petitioner was

sentenced to a five year incarcerative term following his guilty pleas to the offenses

of aggravated assault and vandalism. After the petitioner filed his post-conviction

petition, the lower court appointed counsel, conducted a hearing, and denied the

requested relief in a well-drafted order setting forth the detailed findings of fact and

conclusions of law. In this appeal, the petitioner challenges the lower court's

determinations he did not enter his guilty pleas knowingly and voluntarily and that

he received the effective assistance of counsel. Having reviewed the record, we

affirm the judgment of the lower court pursuant to Rule 20 of the rules of this court.

In a post-conviction proceeding filed after May 10, 1995, the petitioner

has the burden of establishing his claims by clear and convincing evidence. Tenn.

Code Ann. § 40-30-210(f) (Supp. 1996). A trial court's findings of fact following a

post-conviction hearing have the weight of a jury verdict. Bratton v. State, 477

S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tenn. Crim. App.1971). On appeal, those findings are conclusive

unless the evidence preponderates against the judgment. Butler v. State, 789

S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tenn. 1990). 

In the case at bar, the lower court found that the petitioner failed to

carry his burden of proving his allegations. In this court, he has likewise failed to

establish that the evidence preponderates against the lower court's findings. As a

result, we find no error of law requiring reversal. The lower court's judgment is

affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Court of Criminal Appeals Rules.

_______________________________
3

CURWOOD WITT, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_______________________________

JOE G. RILEY JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

__________ WALKER, SPECIAL JUDGE

NOTE: NEED JUDGE WALKER'S FULL NAME
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18520]

[[Page 46936]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

Fiscal Year 2008 Tariff-Rate Quota Allocations of Raw Cane Sugar, 
Refined and Specialty Sugar, and Sugar-Containing Products; Correction

AGENCY: USTR.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative published 
a document in the Federal Register of August 24, 2007 concerning Fiscal 
Year 2008 Tariff-Rate Quota allocations of raw cane sugar, refined and 
specialty sugar, and sugar-containing products. The document contained 
incorrect data.

Correction to Previous Notice

    In the Federal Register of August 24, 2007, Volume 72, Page 48695, 
the Office of the United States Trade Representative published a notice 
entitled ``Fiscal Year 2008 Tariff-Rate Quota Allocations of Raw Cane 
Sugar, Refined and Specialty Sugar, and Sugar-Containing Products.'' A 
correction is being made to the information in the table in the second 
column, which contains the country-specific allocations for raw sugar. 
The figure for the allocation for the country of Nicaragua is 
incorrect. The correct figure is 22,114 Metric Tons Raw Equivalent 
(MTRV) rather than 22,538 MTRV. All other information remains unchanged 
and will not be repeated in this correction.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie O'Connor, Office of 
Agricultural Affairs, telephone: 202-395-6127 or facsimile: 202-395-
4579.

Susan C. Schwab,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. E8-18520 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W8-P
```