alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
afbg_ex42.htm


EXHIBIT 4.2


 


Board of Directors of


American Fiber Green Products, Inc.


Special Called Meeting


April 7, 2014







Chairman Kenneth McCleave convened a special meeting of the board of directors at 1 p.m. on the 7th of April 2014. Attending the meeting were Chmn. McCleave and Daniel L. Hefner.







Chairman McCleave brought the following item for action:







It is the desire of the officers and Directors to cause the filing of an S-8 Registration Statement to register shares for the purpose of converting booked debt in the names of Kenneth McCleave, Daniel Hefner and Kristal McCleave Beckum to equity.







It is suggested that AFBG allow conversion of debt to equity by the named above for debt accrued and booked at 85% of the closing bid on April 6, 2014. The closing bid was $.21 which makes the conversion at $.1785. The amount to be converted is delineated below:


 




	
Kenneth McCleave

	$200,000	 
	
Daniel L. Hefner

	$74,971	 
	
Kristal McCleave Beckum

	$99,967	 
	
 

	$374,938	 







 


This conversion will result in the issuance of 2,100,493 common shares .







Upon motion and unanimous vote of the Board, it is resolved that the recommendation delineated is accepted and approved to be implemented at the direction and timing of management.







There being no other business, Chmn. McCleave adjourned the meeting at 1:45 p.m.


 


Respectfully submitted,


 


/s/Daniel L. Hefner


Acting Secretary
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- EX-10.6




 Exhibit 10.6 
 SCYNEXIS, Inc. 
 Description of Non-Employee Directors Compensation
Program 
 Following the closing of this offering, we intend to compensate our non-employee directors with a combination of cash and equity.
Each non-employee director will receive an annual base cash retainer of $30,000 for such service, to be paid quarterly. In addition, the chairman of our board of directors will receive an additional annual base cash retainer of $15,000, to be paid
quarterly. 
 In addition, we intend to compensate the members of our board of directors for service on our committees as
follows: 
  

	 	Ÿ	 	 The chairperson of our audit committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for this service, paid quarterly, and each of the other members
of the audit committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $6,500, paid quarterly. 


  

	 	Ÿ	 	 The chairperson of our compensation committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $7,500 for this service, paid quarterly, and each of the other
members of the compensation committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $5,000, paid quarterly. 


  

	 	Ÿ	 	 The chairperson of our nominating and corporate governance committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $4,500 for this service, paid quarterly,
and each of the other members of the nominating and corporate governance committee will receive an annual cash retainer of $3,000, paid quarterly. 


 Further, after the closing of this offering, each year on or promptly following the date of our annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director will be granted an option to purchase 1,470
shares of our common stock, and our chairman will be granted an additional option to purchase 735 shares of our common stock. If a new board member joins our board of directors after the closing of this offering, the director will be granted an
initial option to purchase 3,186 shares of our common stock, and if a new chairman joins our board of directors after the closing of this offering, the chairman will be granted an initial option to purchase 4,779 shares of our common stock. Annual
option grants and initial option grants to new board members will have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant and will vest in full on the earlier of our next annual meeting of
stockholders to occur in the year following the date of grant and the one year anniversary of the date of grant; provided, that the non-employee director is providing continuous services on the applicable vesting date.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 632 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.632

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the United 
                                 States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUST COMPENSATION.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end of the first paragraph the following: 
``Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner's 
reasonable costs, including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and 
attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent 
inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no more than 
500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or 
manufacture of the patented invention by or for the United States. 
Nothwithstanding the preceding sentences, unless the action has been 
pending for more than 10 years from the time of filing to the time that 
the owner applies for such costs and fees, reasonable and entire 
compensation shall not include such costs and fees if the court finds 
that the position of the United States was substantially justified or 
that special circumstances make an award unjust.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to actions under section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, 
that are pending on, or brought on or after, the date of the enactment 
of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
             18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
             Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             ---------------------------------------------


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jack M.
Laskowitz, as Chief Financial Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of Paradise, Inc.



       /s/ Jack M. Laskowitz            Date:  May 15, 2006
       -----------------------------
       Jack M. Laskowitz
       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Robin R. Corkins, Appellant, v Karen J. Corkins, Respondent.

[677 NYS2d 611]

In an action to modify a judgment of divorce, the father appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated August 26, 1997, which, *inter alia,*determined that the Supreme Court had jurisdiction in this matter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The parties were divorced by an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Columbia County, entered May 20, 1993, in which the terms of a “stipulation and opt-out agreement” dated June 10, 1992, were incorporated but not merged. That agreement gave the parties joint custody of their only child and physical custody to the mother, who lived in New York.

The mother remarried in April 1993 and the father relocated from New York to North Carolina in November 1994. In August 1995 the mother and father agreed that the child would temporarily reside with the father due to the mother’s marital difficulties with her second husband. In or about May 1997 the father commenced a proceeding in North Carolina to modify the New York judgment of divorce to grant sole custody of the child to him. In June 1997 the child returned to New York. The mother then commenced this action to modify the judgment of divorce to grant her sole custody of the child and to enjoin the father from continuing with his North Carolina proceeding. The Supreme Court determined that it had jurisdiction over the dispute and ordered a hearing on the issue of custody.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the evidence indicates that the child and the parties still have a strong connection to this State in that the parties were married in New York, and the child was born in New York and lived here until temporarily relocating to North Carolina to live with the father. Moreover, the mother continues to reside in New York and the child had *784visited her in New York during his summer vacation and school holiday recesses. The Supreme Court therefore had jurisdiction to modify the custody provisions of the divorce judgment *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 75-d [1] [b]; *Matter of Irwin v Schmidt,*236 AD2d 401; *Matter of Heitler v Hoosin,*143 AD2d 1018). Since the Supreme Court issued the first custody determination, its continued exercise of jurisdiction was consistent with the Parental Kidnaping Prevention Act of 1980 *(see,*28 USC § 1738A [d]; *Matter of Irwin v Schmidt, supra).*Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
215 So.2d 443

#### STATE of Alabama ex rel. MacDonald GALLION, Attorney General v. David L. THOMAS, District Attorney, Twenty-Third Judicial Circuit.

8 Div. 309.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Oct. 25, 1968.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., John G. Bookout, Dept. Atty. Gen., Bernard F. Sykes, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Wm. J. Baxley, Dist. Atty., for the State.

Lanier, Shaver & Herring, Huntsville, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This impeachment proceeding is in the nature of a criminal prosecution, hence the defendant came into this Court with a presumption of innocence. The burden was upon the prosecution to adduce evidence sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty.

We have given careful consideration to the evidence presented and cannot say that the prosecution has met the burden which was upon it. Consequently, we hold the defendant to be not guilty of any of the charges made against him in the Information filed in this Court by the prosecution. A judgment of acquittal will be entered by the Clerk of this Court.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, SIMPSON and KOHN, JJ., concur.

MERRILL, COLEMAN and HAR-WOOD, JJ., dissent.
CA5£ h)o . 0^-l5~- 00535'C.^

Oc+ob-er?, IZ, Zo/5"

Ifessc G A

V.

"TV\t ^r^-Tc: Op 5 S

° =^s "fex.%S £ >53 « U3 -i-Tn

io CJ

•X ro

lo k'3^ozvcvbl-e

^-ocaZVU Cot^ytA- oP AppeiaLS oF

IXYOI^^ T^5^-<- XTbA^eZ

"bix £. AppiS^ZZ-^i^-i- 44^Abt>iy-C 5^4Yf^<j AncJ

ALxw^ l9-€rLe.cl . Av»(4 0 4^'!3 AVvoTi Or\ fovC

C-c? L\ vi^ ^ 'J^i^ tip j

lixjp-e U A-i-d fc>(lo

I . Tke^ F^<_4-LAuq-l b»^5t"i, ^-kt^ /(/i.o-Pun;

"Tbe_ -l-f2a^\ Cc3cAr^f Ap^^CK-V-l dci Arkkor^i^-^y iVlicV^t-l Ycu.Kj^ CAie/" Pukli^ C-

^'i-
-rr

4 AppcilAv^4".

CAJ< U^\a3 +-0 'Ric.hAC^d ISDu.lf=vwvj ^ AjJiS^fexK-/- Publt'c

Offend ^

o^ 2-H--2.atS-,

R~.c,v«^i .""Y,

CUitf PvitWc D-ffe^xJ^tt /Vi'ioW^-el

Aiad no-p C_rvv ^oUJccL A-Ue. 'Q^X-A/^ Couv\.4v^ PcxIdIiC^ [^fcy>.<J'^'^ 5 . •^C_ -Poyl. fr Aj^P^(|o/CH

bru* «p ^ a U.C. The

App^llo'^4' ViaJ ioo (J c-ia of 5m.ck

€,(/'C(a,^5 tKv^ |A» "V4<2.A ]^l o^V«y2.q/. '?) , Ol\^ A/x y - (\pp-e( 1A»-vT- cv^ iWcL^'^-e-^'(~ p-^rLjoiA

Ai^d n^d fc)r2-

V\t^ b^2.ce/^.

'p.i cVv Arftd- B» DalA.v\y uj'

Accfpl A^pDxV^4^,^-|' 4-kr, CASe t

App€.I(yq .^-P UJOLA- [<4 'Q_<i-5j;ec4-/!A (IiJ Acc<p" VY\R. OuU»^ty ^1^ic.V\»vJ Ar5 l-e^cL

4-1^^

VY\R. L)UU»^ty

jf 4-U^ Co<Ayt4 .) UMOlA _

1!>-€aa-c2^ CovA<^'P»j'• PcaWV'c^ Q^^r>J<frts d-^frcd

\ o-A .

App€-UiA^4- iUv^l- yTin, .0<;vl

V\<^3 +'^<1' <vvxj

^pC-^iKxee c/d/;^i

iJA

2^ 1/
App-e-tUvv-l- 4k^i4-^

Iy »-T -T^'

'\2.-£. »v\ ci "-Wo Cia5<. Alp-tial Co^i^-r T^

CdUi/I-L 4'^v»^poa.Ay2^AW Abhr"rc App-€A( ' ' '

, AV-c -W-tiiv] CO o^rL-h T^a.

Wli^ViAs/^, ic\.s^^ a13<^

'A-V-lb -W ^(i^^-l icv

<i>cv^V rLcli^i- fv-i r^'^a AK J »

^<^Sp^cJ'-k^ll (-|> 5ukv)-»<4"kJ^

^ OCC> At

C:i\fkas^^ UJ«;)(- Uh»4

^Z66 Z.o'L

'B^<.\/.\\<J

CERTHi^/IC/birg oP SERVICE

Appv^L-kAv^-l- ^€<2.-tiPv| -pk^-l- C^py'

0-P Akd. labo'^^ KlAi-lij/^ lot^^ Kvir^^'/leJ "b'

(\pp^LLe€ J A^icVit>\jc\5 A

C^Tw^.'vv^l O/b-^Aick ^IAV\I

5"
D) cJ- ^4- Hjr?- k\ S C-.'C ,

'^ ^ ^ '

/Uu-Cv/ja :^'7"/ Jcii^ '^/O , flw'l-'^h.i ^ Tfel/iJ

n^'ZjO'i ov^ jz^ 2,^ IS'.

<.' /J '<

J e^y<. 6 m.2_)4

P ^ ^ ^ ^
V

CNj"

cO

o

\q

kj

««

—-J

f:iued , ^

IN THE COUITT OF AfFEA.e

AT SAN ANTONIO. It a;

20ISOCT 19

KriT.'i't. KOTTLE.CLERH

•1-^-

(J

3^ £

4-

, o

4

I

1

~o

S

V

Q,

V G-

<a: h
/G.

5^

r

r

•si

a)

w

o

m

w

o

3

U)

U)

L'J

A?-SAN

2015 OCT 19

FIL^D C ^ .

ccuFT ar '.-h • ^ AmNANTONlP.l! '.j-rZt ^

PH 2! af J

KtM'-i f

O

A •

Hi

1^

^o

G>

35

f^

UiP

J5- o n» c 0^ ^ r. 3 CI-^ ^

^ 0 v
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6386 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in Schaumburg, 

Illinois, as the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6386 RFS

1 SECTION 1. VETERANS OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN MEMO2 RIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 450 West Schaumburg Road in 

5 Schaumburg, Illinois, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial Post Of7 fice Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Veterans of Iraq and 

12 Afghanistan Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Arotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Ehrlich, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
   By:
              /s/ Robert S. EhrlichRobert
      S. EhrlichChairman
      and CEO(Chief
      Executive Officer)
 
 Date:    
April 14, 2008
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

_____________

No. 13-4341

_____________

HEIKE OBERGANTSCHNIG,

 Appellant

v.

SAW CREEK ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.; 

JAMES ANDREWS; PEGGY SCHAU; ARTIE FURMAN 

________________________ 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

District Court No. 2-12-cv-05911

District Judge: The Honorable J. Curtis Joyner 

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

July 10, 2014

Before: SMITH, VANASKIE, and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges

(Filed: July 31, 2014)

_____________________

OPINION

_____________________

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Heike Obergantschnig worked as a dispatch officer for the public safety 

department of Saw Creek Estates Community Association (Saw Creek) from 

January of 2008 to January of 2011. After Saw Creek terminated 
2

Obergantschnig’s employment, she filed a complaint in the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. She alleged claims of sexual 

harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 

as amended. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. 

After discovery closed, Saw Creek filed a motion for summary judgment on 

both claims. The District Court granted Saw Creek’s motion. This timely appeal 

followed.1 We will affirm.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record before 

us. We agree with the District Court that Obergantschnig failed to establish that 

the sexual harassment was sufficiently pervasive. See Mandel v. M & Q Pkg. 

Corp., 706 F.3d 157, 167 (3d Cir. 2013) (listing as an element of a hostile work 

environment claim that “the discrimination was severe or pervasive”). In addition, 

we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted on the retaliation claim.

The District Court appropriately determined that Obergantschnig’s complaints did 

not constitute protected activity. See Wilkerson v. New Media Tech. Charter Sch. 

Inc., 522 F.3d 315, 320 (3d Cir. 2008) (noting elements of prima facie case of 

retaliation under Title VII includes that plaintiff “engaged in a protected activity”).

 

1

The District Court exercised jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. We have final 

order jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise plenary review over a 

district court’s order granting summary judgment. Mandel v. M & Q Pkg. Corp., 

706 F.3d 157, 164 (3d Cir. 2013).
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6047 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to submit to Congress 

a report on COVID–19 natural immunity, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. ROY (for himself, Mr. MASSIE, Mr. PERRY, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mrs. 

BOEBERT, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. WEBER of Texas, and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

submit to Congress a report on COVID–19 natural immunity, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Immunity 

5 Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON COVID–19 NATURAL IMMUNITY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6047 IH

1 and Human Services shall submit to Congress a report 

2 that contains the following data— 

3 (1) the number of individuals who recovered 

4 from a COVID–19 infection, and never received a 

5 COVID–19 vaccine, during the period beginning on 

6 January 1, 2020, and ending on such date of enact7 ment, and who subsequently— 

8 (A) died from a COVID–19 infection; 

9 (B) were hospitalized from a COVID–19 

10 infection; 

11 (C) had an additional confirmed case of 

12 COVID–19; or 

13 (D) transmitted SARS–CoV–2 to another 

14 person or persons while reinfected; and 

15 (2) the number of individuals who received all 

16 recommended doses of a COVID–19 vaccine during 

17 the period beginning on December 14, 2020, and 

18 ending on such date of enactment, and who subse19 quently— 

20 (A) died from a COVID–19 infection; 

21 (B) were hospitalized from a COVID–19 

22 infection; or 

23 (C) had a confirmed breakthrough case. 

24 (b) DEFINITIONS.— In this section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6047 IH

1 (1) BREAKTHROUGH CASE.—The term ‘‘break2 through case’’, with respect to a case of COVID–19, 

3 means the detection of SARS–CoV–2 RNA or anti4 gen in a respiratory specimen collected from an indi5 vidual at least 14 days after the date on which such 

6 individual received all recommended doses of a 

7 COVID–19 vaccine. 

8 (2) COVID–19 VACCINE.—The term ‘‘COVID– 

9 19 vaccine’’ means a vaccine for COVID–19 that 

10 has been licensed under section 351 of the Public 

11 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262) or authorized 

12 for emergency use under section 564 of the Federal 

13 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb– 

14 3). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6201 

To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work 

to honor enslaved and free Black persons who served in the American 

Revolution, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN (for herself, Mrs. HINSON, and Mr. NEGUSE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work to honor enslaved and free Black persons 

who served in the American Revolution, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Liberty Me5 morial Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that the period preceding the 250th 

8 anniversary of the founding of the United States on July 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6201 IH

1 4, 1776, offers the best conditions in ten generations to 

2 honor and preserve the contributions of enslaved and free 

3 Black soldiers and civilians to independence by the tri4 umph of a permanent National Liberty Memorial rep5 resenting deeds Congress on two previous occasions de6 clared of ‘‘preeminent historical and lasting significance 

7 to the nation’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT 

9 OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK. 

10 Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United 

11 States Code, the authority provided by section 2860 of the 

12 Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

13 2013 (division B of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 2164; 

14 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply through Sep15 tember 30, 2027. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS