U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Prosecutorial Justification for Sexual Assault Case Rejection: Guarding the Gateway to Justice
NCJ Number
              241146
Journal

*Social Problems* Volume: 48 Issue: 2 Dated: 2001 Pages: 206-235
Author(s)
          Cassia Spohn;
                        Dawn Beichner;
                        Erika Davis-Frenzel
Date Published

2001
Length
              30 pages
Annotation
              In examining prosecutorial justifications for not bringing charges in sexual assault cases, this study obtained data on all sexual battery cases (n = 140) with alleged victims over 12 years old cleared by arrest in 1997 by the Sexual Crimes Bureau of the Miami-Dade (Miami, FL) Police Department.
Abstract
              The objective of this study was to replicate and extend Frohmann's (1991) study of prosecutorial justifications for not bringing charges in sexual assault cases. Although the findings of the current study are consistent with Frohmann's conclusion that prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases are based on the prosecutor's assessment of the likelihood of conviction, the current study also determined that this prosecutorial assessment is based on factors other than prosecutorial beliefs about rape scenarios and the characterizations of rape victims. In a substantial number of the cases in the current study, the prosecutor's decision not to bring charges could be traced to the alleged victim's failure to appear for an interview prior to the charging decision, refusal to cooperate in the prosecution of the case, or admission that the charges were fabricated. The current study also found that a prosecutor's decision as to whether or not to file charges was based on a combination of case and victim characteristics. Case that involved an alleged victim and suspect who were acquainted, related, or intimate partners were more likely to be rejected than those cases that involved an alleged victim and suspect who were strangers. The authors conclude that prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases are guided by a set of "focal concerns' that revolve around the likelihood of securing a conviction. This set of "focal concerns" includes prosecutorial beliefs about what constitutes rape and a legitimate rape victim. 4 tables and 25 references
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        98-WT-VX-0003


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Study/Research)
    
  
  
Date Published: January 1, 2001
    
          Downloads
        
                      HTML

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Case processing
        Criminology
        NIJ Grant-related Documents
        Prosecutorial discretion
        Sexual assault



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Random Forest Processing of Direct Analysis in Real-Time Mass Spectrometric Data Enables Species Identification of Psychoactive Plants From Their Headspace Chemical Signatures
                  A Low-Cost, Simplified Platform of Interchangeable, Ambient Ionization Sources for Rapid, Forensic Evidence Screening on Portable Mass Spectrometric Instrumentation
                  GC-MS Studies on the Regioisomeric 2 3- and 3 4-Methylenedioxyphenethylamines Related to MDEA MDMMA and MBDB
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov