alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 3.6

                        AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS AS ADOPTED BY
                            THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                           SOLIGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                ON APRIL 20, 1998

         RESOLVED,  that  Section  2.9 of the  Company's  Bylaws is hereby
amended to provide in its entirety as follows:

         "2.9 MANNER OF ACTING. At any shareholder meeting at which a quorum is
present, action on a matter (other than the election of directors) by a voting
group is approved if the votes cast within the voting group favoring the action
exceed the votes cast opposing the action, unless the affirmative vote of a
greater number is required by these Bylaws, the Articles of Incorporation or the
Wyoming Business Corporation Act."
|   | 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for      the period ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      China Advanced Construction Materials Group,  Inc. |

| Date:      January 20, 2009                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
| /s/Chin Hsiao                                                 |
| Chin      HsiaoPrincipal      Financial and AccountingOfficer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TOTAL 
CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND 1998 AND FOR EACH OF THE THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,882,735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,537,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (365,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 13,520,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,674,701
<PP&E>                                       5,465,409
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,579,490)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,799,339
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,475,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    35,053,113
<OTHER-SE>                                   (628,254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,799,339
<SALES>                                     60,642,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,642,026
<CGS>                                       27,846,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,846,159<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,781,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               138,211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             462,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,627,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,940,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,066,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,066,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
<FN>
<F1>Included in costs and other expenses is $1,336,812 related to a charge
for restructuring and $200,000 related to a charge for purchased in process
research and development.


        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7233** 

TYRONE JOHNSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ROY COOPER , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00242

- FDW )

Submitted : November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
.
Tyrone Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Johnson, a North Carolina inm ate, see ks to appeal the district court’ s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) federal habeas petition. The district court ’s final order was entered on March 31, 201 5
. We construe Johnson’s notice of appeal as having been filed, at the earliest, on August 4, 2015, the date appearing on that document
. See Fed.
R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 27 6 (1988)
. In his notice of appeal, Johnson stated that he did not receive notice of the district court ’ s order until August 3, 201 5.
Pa rties are accorded 30 days after entry of the district

c ourt’ s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T] he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
J ohnson’s notice of appeal is clearly untimely. However, under Rule 4(a)(6), the district court may reopen the time to file an appeal if (1) the moving party did not receive notice of entry of judgment within 21 days after entry, (2) the motion is filed within 180 days of entry of judgment or within 14 days of receiving notice from the court, whichever is earlier, and (3) no party would be prejudiced. We remand for the limited purpose3 of permitting the district court to determine whether Johnson is entitled to the benefit of Rule 4(a)(6) to reopen the t ime to file an appeal. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-2166
ABRAHAM THOMPSON, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; ROSS R. BACCARNIRI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA02-2735-JFM) Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 30, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Abraham Thompson, III, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Abraham Thompson, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Thompson v. U.S. Postal Service , No. CA-02-2735-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
fs2014a1ex10vi_royalbakery.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 







  





  











  






 







  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 




4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN P & F INDUSTRIES. INC.'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         205,082
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,636,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 26,126,698
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,247,718
<PP&E>                                      18,805,079
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,910,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,100,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,247,724
<BONDS>                                      7,875,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,647,893
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,226,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,100,423
<SALES>                                     39,390,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,760,695
<CGS>                                       27,078,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,078,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             677,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,357,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,271,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,086,676
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,086,676
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Anoteros, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
      G. Chachas, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:




(1)        The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date:
          October 19, 2007                                                               
    /s/  George G.
          Chachas
 By:
          George G. Chachas
 Chief
          Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### Edward W. Brown and James W. Shaw, Appellants, v. Retsof Mining Company, Respondent. (Action No. 5.)

Judgment affirmed on argument, with costs. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-14-00589-CV

Style: Rosemary Thompson and Timothy E. Thompson

v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Ace Securities Corp. Home 

Equity Loan Trust Series 2004-HE3 Asset-Backed-Pass-Through Certificates

Date motion filed: September 29, 2014

Type of motion: “Motion for Admissible Expedited Default Judgment Signed Dated June 20, 2008 as Key 

Evidence” 

Party filing motion: Appellants

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: November 25, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6221 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6221

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, as the ``James A. Rogers Jr. 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JAMES A. ROGERS JR. POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 155 Main Avenue West in Winsted, Minnesota, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James A. Rogers Jr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James A. 
Rogers Jr. Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
224 So.2d 625

#### Eleanor F. CUDD et al. v. CITY OF HOMEWOOD, a Municipal Corporation, et al.

6 Div. 627.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 6, 1969.

Jenkins, Cole, Callaway & Vance, Birmingham, for appellants.

Jack H. Harrison, of Beavers, Shannon, Harrison and Charles E. Sharp, of Sadler, Sadler, Sullivan & Sharp, Birmingham, for appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION UNDER RULE 17.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

Appellees have filed Motion, under Rule 17, Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of Alabama, 279 Ala. XXI, XLIV, seeking this court’s ruling for an automatic affirmance in this case because the appeal “is made solely for delay.”

While undoubtedly there is a field of operation for Rule 17, we are not convinced from the record this is such a case.

The case should he set for oral hearing at the next call of the 6th Division, either the week of April 21 or the week of April 28, 1969.

Appellees’ Motion to advance the hearing on oral argument under Rule 31 is inapposite and is denied.

So ordered.

: LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and COLEM1AN, JJ., concur.
#### David Hordern v. The Salvation Army.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 476 -CV Cha r le s F . R owse y , I II, App e lla nt

v. David Allb ritton and Crystal Allbritton , Appellees F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 353RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- GN-06- 0030 82 , HO NORAB LE STEP HEN Y ELENOSK Y , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Ap pe lla nt C ha rl e s F . Ro ws e y , I I Iha s in fo rm e d th is C ourt that he ha s se ttl e d h is dispute with appellee s David Allbritton and Cry stal Allbritton and that he no long er w ishes to pursue this appeal. We there fore g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Puryear and He nson Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: January

17, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 06-1411

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint and

defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure (additionally docketed as a Motion to Dismiss). For the reasons stated in the

Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint [30] is GRANTED; 

and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [50] and for

Judgment on the Pleadings [51] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

_/s/_________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: February 27, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6185 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6185

  To provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights have been 
  violated by a person acting under Federal authority, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2021

   Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Raskin, Ms. Norton, Ms. 
Schakowsky, Ms. Scanlon, Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Jones, 
Mr. Lieu, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Tlaib, and Mr. Carson) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide a civil remedy for an individual whose rights have been 
  violated by a person acting under Federal authority, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bivens Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. CIVIL ACTION AGAINST PERSON ACTING UNDER FEDERAL AUTHORITY.

    Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended by 
inserting ``of the United States or'' before ``of any State''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.3



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







May 2, 2008



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6218 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as 

the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 6218 EH

1 SECTION 1. W.O.C. KORT MILLER PLANTENBERG POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Min5 nesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W.O.C. 

6 Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller 

11 Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2022. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6218 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPlantenberg Post Office’’. Minnesota, as the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller al Service located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon,
----

----

|   | (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      6, 2010 | /s/      James      Roszel |
|------------------|----------------------------|
|             | James      Roszel          |
|             | President                  |

----