alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.2
                                 ------------




          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                       1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                       2
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**P & F INDUSTRIES,INC.****CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of P&F Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Joseph A.Molino, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Joseph A. Molino, Jr.    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Joseph A.  Molino, Jr.       |
| Principal  Financial Officer |
| May 17, 2004                 |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie WOODS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-5583.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 17, 2003.

Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; ROGERS, Circuit Judge; and EDMUNDS, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

*ORDER*

Willie Woods, Jr., pleaded guilty to witness tampering and conspiracy to possess cocaine base for intended distribution. *See*18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3) *and*21 U.S.C. § 846. On April 5, 2002, he was sentenced to eighty-eight months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. It is from this judgment that Woods now appeals. The parties have waived oral argument, and the panel unanimously agrees that it is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Woods argues that his offense level should have been reduced under USSG § 3B1.2(b), as he was a only minor participant in the offense. It was Woods’s burden to show by a preponderance of the evidence that he was entitled to a reduction under § 3B1.2. *See United States v. Latouf,*132 F.3d 320, 332 (6th Cir.1997). Thus, he was required to show that he was “substantially less culpable than the average participant” in the offense. USSG § 3B1.2, comment. (n.3(A)) (2001). A defendant is not entitled to such a reduction if his participation is indispensable to the execution of the offense. *See Latouf,*132 F.3d at 332.

The district court reasoned as follows in denying Woods’s request for a § 3B1.2 reduction: *799[T]he defendant was clearly not a minor or minimal participant. It’s true he had a supplier, but all drug dealers have a supplier. And the fact that someone has more dope than he does and provides it to him doesn’t make this defendant a minimal or a minor participant. He was involved in more than one hand-to-hand transaction. He was also involved in trying to hush up a potential witness against him.

We generally review a district court’s refusal to grant a § 3B1.2 reduction for clear error. *See United States v. Tilford,*224 F.3d 865, 868 (6th Cir.2000). However, it may be appropriate to review the court’s legal conclusions *de novo*when the facts are not in dispute. *See United States v. Roberts,*223 F.3d 377, 379-80 (6th Cir. 2000). Woods’s claim fails under either analysis.

Woods now argues that he should have been considered a minor participant in relation to his co-conspirator, John Geanes. In particular, Woods argues that he only kept a portion of the proceeds from the drug transactions and that Geanes was the supplier of the drugs. These arguments are unavailing in light of Agent Schuler’s testimony at sentencing, which plainly indicates that Woods’s participation was pervasive and essential to the offense. Thus, Woods has not carried his burden of showing that he was substantially less culpable than the average participant in the conspiracy. *See Tilford,*224 F.3d at 869; *Roberts,*223 F.3d at 381-82.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R1-FHC-2008-N0206; 81331-1334-8TWG-W4]


Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG) affords 
stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical 
input concerning Trinity River (California) restoration efforts to the 
Trinity Management Council (TMC). This notice announces a TAMWG 
meeting, which is open to the public.

DATES: TAMWG will meet from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on Monday, August 25, 2008 
and from 8:30 to 1 on Tuesday, August 26, 2008.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Weaverville Victorian Inn, 
1709 Main St., 299 West, Weaverville, CA 96093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy A. Brown of the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521; telephone: (707) 
822-7201. Randy A. Brown is the TAMWG Designated Federal Officer. For 
background information and questions regarding the Trinity River 
Restoration Program (TRRP), please contact Douglas Schleusner, 
Executive Director, Trinity River Restoration Program, P.O. Box 1300, 
1313 South Main Street, Weaverville, CA 96093; telephone: (530) 623-
1800; E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b6d2c5d5dedad3c3c5d8d3c4f6dbc698c3c5d4c498d1d9c0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="187c6b7b70747d6d6b767d6a587568366d6b7a6a367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), this notice announces a meeting 
of the (TAMWG).
    Primary objectives of the meeting will include discussion of the 
following topics:
    <bullet> TRRP construction program,
    <bullet> TRRP budget,
    <bullet> Integrated Assessment Plan,
    <bullet> Trinity River Hatchery goals and policies, and
    <bullet> Response to CDR Situation Assessment.
    Completion of the agenda is dependent on the amount of time each 
item takes. The meeting could end early if the agenda has been 
completed.

    Dated: July 24, 2008.
Randy A. Brown,
Designated Federal Officer, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, 
CA.
[FR Doc. E8-18696 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.2
                       CERTIFICATION

I, Neal E. Schmale, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pacific
Enterprises;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

August 5, 2004

/S/ NEAL E. SCHMALE
Neal E. Schmale
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      99.2**





CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB/A of Loma
      Verde Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Peter Hill, Chief
      Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.
            The
                Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                (a) or 15
                (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
                of the
                Company.





October
      18, 2006


PETER
      HILL


Peter
      Hill


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and Director











-1-
EXHIBIT 35.1
            SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)
                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
     GMACM HOME LOAN TRUST 2006-HLTV1 (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC , as servicer
(the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the  Servicing  Agreement,  dated as of March 30,
2006, (as amended from time to time, the "Agreement"),  among GMAC Mortgage, LLC
(formerly  GMAC  Mortgage  Corporation),  as  servicer,  GMACM  Home Loan  Trust
2006-HLTV1, as the issuing entity and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association,
as indenture trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such  period.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has duly  executed  this
Certificate this 26th day of March 2007.

By:      /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      -------------------------
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:    Executive Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-63,694]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on August 1, 2008, applicable to workers of Klaussner Furniture Industries, Inc., Asheboro, North Carolina. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 12, 2008 (73 FR 46922).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of upholstered furniture.

Findings show that there was a previous certification, TA-W-59,586, issued on July 31, 2006, for the workers of the Asheboro, North Carolina location of the subject firm. That certification expired July 31, 2008. To avoid an overlap in worker group coverage for the workers of the Asheboro, North Carolina location, the certification is being amended to change the impact date from July 31, 2008 to August 1, 2008.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,694 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers of Klaussner Furniture Industries, Inc., Asheboro, North Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after August 1, 2008, through August 1, 2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of August 2008.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-19186 Filed 8-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Stella D. Carlos Salmeron v. Felipe De Jesus Garcia Santacruz

Appellate case number: 01-19-00087-CV

Trial court case number: 1117543

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County

The clerk’s record indicates that in September 2018 appellant Stella D. Carlos Salmeron 

filed in the trial court a statement of inability to afford payment of court costs. This complies with 

Rule 145. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a). When a party files a statement of inability in the trial court, 

that party cannot be required to pay costs except by order of the court. See id. The clerk’s record 

contains no order requiring appellant to pay costs. 

Fees charged for preparation of the appellate record are governed by Rule 145. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 20.1(a). Because appellant filed a statement of inability in the trial court and the trial 

court did not sign an order requiring her to pay court costs, she is not required to pay costs for the 

appellate record. Moreover, appellant is not required to pay appellate filing fees. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 20.1(a),(b) (party who filed statement of inability in trial court is not required to pay appellate 

court costs unless trial court overruled that party’s claim of indigence in an order under Rule of 

Civil Procedure 145).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Justice Peter Kelly_____________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __February 12, 2019___
#### In the Matter of Everett T. Chappell.

Hearing set for Friday, February nineteenth, at ten-thirty a. m. (See memorandum per curiam.)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6145 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6145

   To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to develop a 
Community Bank Leverage Ratio that is between 8 percent and 8.5 percent 
    for calendar years 2022, 2023, and 2024, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 7, 2021

   Mr. Mann introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the appropriate Federal banking agencies to develop a 
Community Bank Leverage Ratio that is between 8 percent and 8.5 percent 
    for calendar years 2022, 2023, and 2024, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Bank Relief Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNITY BANK LEVERAGE RATIO.

    Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer 
Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5371 note) is amended by striking subsection 
(b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Community Bank Leverage Ratio.--
            ``(1) In general.--The appropriate Federal banking agencies 
        shall, through notice and comment rule making under section 553 
        of title 5, United States Code--
                    ``(A) develop a Community Bank Leverage Ratio of 
                not less than 8 percent and not more than 10 percent 
                for qualifying community banks; and
                    ``(B) establish procedures for treatment of a 
                qualifying community bank that has a Community Bank 
                Leverage Ratio that falls below the percentage 
                developed under paragraph (1) after exceeding the 
                percentage developed under paragraph (1).
            ``(2) Calendar years 2022, 2023, and 2024.--Not 
        withstanding paragraph (1), the appropriate Federal banking 
        agencies shall, through notice and comment rule making under 
        section 553 of title 5, United States Code, develop a Community 
        Bank Leverage Ratio to apply during the period beginning on 
        January 1, 2022, and ending on December 31, 2024, that is not 
        less than 8 percent and not more than 8.5 percent for 
        qualifying community banks.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DA VID P. HENRY , Appel lant,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2014 LT. Case No

. 2016

- DR -0 11118

J ESSICA B. CARROLL , Appel lee. /
Opi nion filed N ovember 22, 2022 Appeal f rom the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Jennifer Opel Taylor , Judge.
D avid P. Henry , Melbourne, pro se

. M aria Henderson, of Henderson Legal Group, Viera , for Appelle e.

P ER CURIAM

. A FFIRMED. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

L A MBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WA LLIS , JJ., concur.