alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                             491
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,517
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    117,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,830
<PP&E>                                          94,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,851
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,412
<BONDS>                                         57,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,851
<SALES>                                        240,953
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,953
<CGS>                                          156,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,390
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,710)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,029)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 20, 2020

a0520 

# Order

Clerk May 20, 2020

160578

WESLEY ZOO YANG and VIENGK HAM

MOUALOR,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v SC: 160578

COA: 344987

EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE Wayne CC: 17

- 018062

- NF

COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

MOTORIST MUTUAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

T he appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing : (1) whether an insurer may cancel an insurance policy in compliance with

MCL 500.3020(1)(b) by mailing a written notice of cancellation to the insured before the

grounds for cancellation have occurre d; and (2) whether the appellant ’s written notice of

cancellation complied with the provision in the insurance policy that requires “at least 10

days notice by first class mail, if cancellation is for non

- payment o f premium. ” In addition

to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an appendix conforming to MCR

7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers

as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellees shall fil e supplemental briefs within 21

days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The appellees shall also electronically file

appendices, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the

appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed b y the appellant within 14 days of being served

with the latter of the appellees’ briefs. The parties should not submit mere restatements of

their application papers.

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow

Miller, P.C.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Brekford International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C.B. Brechin, Principal Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| |                            
| | /s/ C.B. Brechin           
| | C.B. Brechin               
| | Principal Executive Officer
| |                            
| | Date: March 23, 2009       
| |                            



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRICIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)  The undersigned do hereby certify that to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2006 by DiaSys Corporation, to which this certification is appended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of DiaSys Corporation.  Dated: November 14, 2006  S/GREGORY WITCHEL Gregory Witchel, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)  Dated: November 14 , 2006  S/JEFFREY B. AARONSON Jeffrey B. Aaronson, President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)  U:\RKEPPEL\DIASYS\SECFilingsDrafts\10-KSB2006\Exhibit 32.doc
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60098

 

FELICIEN CYUBAHIRO,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, 

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A71-771-673

--------------------

March 7, 2002

Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Felicien Cyubahiro petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Cyubahiro’s state

conviction for felony driving while intoxicated was an aggravated

felony warranting his removal from this country. The respondent

has moved to dismiss the petition for review and to remand the

case to the BIA for reconsideration in light of United States v.

Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir. 2001). Cyubahiro has

not replied to the respondent’s motion to remand. 
No. 01-60098

-2-

Cyubahiro’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order of

the BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA for

disposition consistent with Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d at 927. All

other outstanding motions are DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6246 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6246

     To direct the Department of Defense to establish policies and 
  procedures for providing continuing language education to military 
                   linguists, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 13, 2021

  Mr. Bacon introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Department of Defense to establish policies and 
  procedures for providing continuing language education to military 
                   linguists, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Language Continuing 
Education Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. DEFENSE LANGUAGE CONTINUING EDUCATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness shall establish policies and procedures to provide, to 
linguists of the covered Armed Forces who have made the transition from 
formal training programs to operational and staff assignments, 
continuing language education to maintain their respective language 
proficiencies.
    (b) Reimbursement Authority.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary, in coordination 
        with the chief of each covered Armed Force, shall establish a 
        procedure by which the covered Armed Force concerned may 
        reimburse an organization of the Department of Defense that 
        provides, to members of such covered Armed Force, continuing 
        language education, described in subsection (a), for the costs 
        of such education.
            (2) Sunset.--The authority under this subsection shall 
        expire on September 30, 2025.
    (c) Briefing.--Not later than July 1, 2022, the Under Secretary 
shall brief the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of 
Representatives on implementation of this section and plans regarding 
continuing language education described in subsection (a).
    (d) Covered Armed Force Defined.--In this section, the term 
``covered Armed Force'' means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, 
or Space Force.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 15.1**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated May 2, 2013 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2013. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136168 effective July 31, 2006, File No. 333-157356 effective February 17, 2009 and File No. 333-176849 effective September 15, 2011) and Form F-3 (File No. 333-177250 effective December 2, 2011).

 

/s/ Grant Thornton India LLP

 

Mumbai, India

May 2, 2013

 

----
18354.

#### Complete Auto Transit, Inc. *v.*Thompson, *et al.*

Argued September 15, 1953

Decided October 14, 1953

Rehearing denied November 12, 1953.

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

This case, being a plain suit for damages and involving also a question of subrogation under Code (Ann. Supp.) § 114-403 (Ga. L. 1922, pp. 185, 186; 1937, pp. 528, 530), as interpreted by later court decisions, comes within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court. Code (Ann.) §§ 2-3704, 2-3708. Accordingly, it must be

*Transferred to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*183*T. Elton Drake, John M. Williams, George A. Durden,*for plaintiff in error.

*Love joy & 'Mayer, Walter D. Sanders, Lipford & Stripling,*contra.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
DANA SYR IA, individua lly a nd on be ha lf of a ll othe rs sim i la

rly situa te d, Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. ALLIANC EONE R

EC EIVAB LES M ANAGEM ENT, INC .; TR ANSW OR L D SYSTEM S, INC .,

De fe nda n ts-Appe lle e s. No. 18-35678 D.C . No. 2:17-c v-01139-TSZ
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Sta t e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington T hom a s S. Zilly , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Argue d a nd Subm itte d M a y

14, 2019 Se a ttle , W a s hington B e fore : HAW KINS, W
. FLETC HER , a nd B ENNETT, C irc uit Judge s . Da na S yr ia (“ Sy ria ” ) a

ppe a ls the d e nia l of he r m otion t o re m a nd a nd the
a dve rse gra nt o f sum

m a ry j udgm e nt on he r W a s h i n g t o n C onsum e r Prote c tion A c t (“ C PA” ), W a sh. R e v . Co d e § 1 9.86 e t se q. , c la im s. W e ha ve jurisdic tion unde r 2 8 

# FIL ED
M AY 24 2019 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* T his disposition is not a

ppropria te for public a t ion a nd i s not pre c e d e nt e xc e pt a s provide d by

Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.U.S.C
. §§ 1291 a n d 1453(c ). W e re vie w de novo, Roth v . C HA Holly w ood Me dic al C e nte r, L.P. , 720 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th C ir. 2013); G ordon v . V irtumundo, Inc

. , 575 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th C ir. 2009), a n d a ffirm
. 1. The re wa s no e rror in de ny ing Sy ria ’ s m otion to re m a nd. The c ourt did not
a buse its disc re tion by striking doc um e nts tha t Sy ria fa ile d to re l y u pon in he r m otion. Se e Hamble ton Bros. Lumbe r C o. v . Balk in Ente rs., Inc

. , 397 F.3d 1217, 1224 n.4 (9th C ir. 2005) (“ A distric t c ourt’ s gra nt of a m otion to strike

is re vie we d for a n a

buse of disc re tion.” ). Sy

ria did n ot bring to the c ourt’ s a tte ntion a ny other d o cu m en ts tha t trigge re d 28 U.S.C . § 1446(b)(3)’ s re m o va l c loc k. 2. The re wa s no e rror in gra nting Allia nc e One R e c e iva

ble s M a na ge m e nt, Inc .’ s (“ AR M I” ) m otion for sum m a ry judgm e nt. W ith re g a rd t o Sy ria ’ s pe r se C PA c la im , e ve n a s sum ing he r le ga l fina nc ia l obliga

t ion c o nst i t u t e s a “ c la im ” unde r the W a shington C o lle c ti o n A g en c ie s Ac t , W a sh. R e v. C ode § 19.16.100 e t se q. , the
c ha lle nge d transa c tion fe e is e xpre ssly a uthoriz e d by W a sh. R e v. C ode § 3 .02.045(1). W ith r eg ar d t o Sy ria ’ s s ta nd-a lone C PA c la i m , it w a s not unfa ir or de c e ptive for AR M I to c ha

rge the transa c tion fe e whe re i t i nform e d Sy ria of the fe e a nd offe re d he r
re a s ona ble a lte rna tive pa

y m e n t options fre e of cha rge . Se e Me rriman v . Am. Guarante e & Liab

. Ins. C o. , 396 P.3d 351, 368 (W a sh. C t. App. 2017) (a n a c t or pra c tic e is not unfa ir unde r the C PA if the c onsum e r c a n a void the injury ).
23. Sy ria ’ s m otion t o c e rtify que s tions to t h e W as h in gton Supre m e C ourt is de nie d. AFFIRM E D.

3
Exhibit 32.3



Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Pantry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 25, 2003, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 9, 2003, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2004, and Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Sodini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Peter J. SodiniPeter J. Sodini Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 29, 2003




This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of
this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of CPG International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Harrison, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as            adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

|  

Date:   March 25, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ SCOTT HARRISON                                                |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   |   | Scott Harrison                                                    |
|                                     |   |   | Executive Vice President, 

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6676
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TONY JAMES MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-36-P, CA-96-21-5-P) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Edward Parrish, Conway, South Carolina, for Appellant. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin , Nos. CR-92-36-P; CA-96-21-5-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in thematerials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Frank J. V. Beck, Respondent, v. Osias Maller, Appellant.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6164 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to conduct a study on scams 

that target travelers during the COVID–19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 7, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to conduct a study 

on scams that target travelers during the COVID–19 

pandemic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Consumers 

5 from Travel Fraud Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FTC STUDY ON TRAVEL FRAUD. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Federal Trade Commission (in this 

8 section referred to as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall conduct a 

9 study, using the Commission’s authority under section 6 

10 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 46), reVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:29 Dec 16, 2021 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6164.IH H6164

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6164 IH

1 garding scams that target travelers during the COVID– 

2 19 pandemic. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 45 days after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to 

5 Congress a report containing the results of the study con6 ducted under subsection (a), together with recommenda7 tions for such legislation and administrative action to pre8 vent and deter scams that target consumers, including on9 line travel booking scams, as the Commission determines 

10 appropriate. 

11 (c) CONSUMER PROTECTION INFORMATION.—Not 

12 later than 30 days after the date of the submission of the 

13 report under subsection (b), the Commission shall update 

14 the website of the Commission to include information for 

15 consumers on avoiding scams that target travelers, includ16 ing scams that target travelers during the COVID–19 

17 pandemic identified in the study conducted under sub18 section (a). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 589

- C V

Style: Rosemary Thompson and Timothy E. Thompson

v

. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Ace Securities Corp

. Home

Equity Loan Trust Series 2004

- HE3 Asset

- Backed

- Pass

- Through Certificates

Date motion filed: September 29 , 201 4

Type of motion: “ Motion for Admissible Expedited Default Judgment Signed Dated June 20, 2008 as Key

Evidence”

Party filing motion: Appell ants

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Terry Jennings



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: November 25, 2014