alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                Statement of Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Twelve Months Ended
                                                           September 30,
                                                      2000               1999
                                                  ------------       ------------
<S>                                               <C>                <C>
Shares Outstanding Beginning of Period              4,090,361          6,924,500

Shares Issued During Period:
                 October 1, 1998                                          60,000
                 December 15, 1998                                       (32,305)
                 December 15, 1998                                        20,000
                 February 23, 1999                                       (66,667)
                 June 14, 1999                                        (2,839,689)
                 June 28, 1999                                            24,522
                 March 6, 2000                        140,000
                                                  ------------       ------------
Total Outstanding                                   4,230,361          4,090,361

Weighted average number of shares outstanding       4,181,348          6,100,537

Shares deemed outstanding from assumed
exercise of stock options                                   -                  -
                                                  ------------       ------------

Total                                               4,181,348          6,100,537
                                                  ============       ============

Earnings (loss) applicable to common shares       $(2,376,488)       $(1,022,694)
                                                  ============       ============

Earnings (loss) per share of common stock         $    (0.568)       $    (0.168)
                                                  ============       ============
</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7056

RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
SERGEANT KELLY, Sergeant, HRRJ; OFFICER GOVIA, Officer, HRRJ
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O’Grady
, Senior District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv

- 00889

- CO

- TCB )

Submitted : December 21 , 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinion s are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Sergeant Kelly
and Officer Govia summary judgment on Lassiter’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional proces s.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**P&FINDUSTRIES, INC.**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of P&FIndustries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Richard A. Horowitz, Principal Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                  | /s/  RICHARD A. HOROWITZ      |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Richard  A. Horowitz          |
| Date  August 13, 2010 | *Principal Executive Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

As adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Independent BancShares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Mark A. Imes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Nicholas J. Panicaro, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              |  |  |  |                                                    
|--------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicholas J. Panicaro                      |  |  |  | /s/ Mark A. Imes                                   
|Nicholas J. Panicaro, Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | Mark A. Imes, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date: March 31, 2009                          |  |  |  | Date: March 31, 2009
Exhibit 33.2
                                 ------------

          ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA



The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A.
(collectively, the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment of
compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation
AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable
in regards to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage-related asset-backed securities
issued on or after January 1, 2006 (and like-kind transactions issued prior to
January 1, 2006) for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration, paying agent or custodial services. The platform includes like
kind transactions for which the Company provided trustee, securities
administrator, paying agent or custodial services as a result of the Company's
acquisition as of October 1, 2006 of portions of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.'s
corporate trust business, including structured finance agency and trust
transactions.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by the related transaction agreements as to
any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122 (d) (1)(ii), (iii),
(iv), (4) (iv), (v), (vi), (vii), (viii), (ix), (x), (xi), (xii) and (xiii).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the
following assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

o  The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

o  The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

o  As of December 31, 2006 and for the Period, the Company was in material
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.



                                      1
<PAGE>


Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing
assessment of compliance.



      The Bank of New York                    The Bank of New York
      The Bank of New York Trust              The Bank of New York Trust
         Company, N.A.                           Company, N.A.


      /s/ Robert L. Griffin                   /s/ Patrick J. Tadie
      ---------------------------             ---------------------------
      Robert L. Griffin                       Patrick J. Tadie
      Authorized Signer                       Authorized Signer


March 1, 2007



                                      2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20097 Conference Calendar

DOMINGO GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARY J. HARMON ET AL., Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * DOMINGO GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MARY J. HARMON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. H-96-CV-2542 H-96-CV-2686

- - - - - - - - - - October 20, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Domingo Garcia, federal prisoner # 661-89-079, appeals the dismissal as frivolous of his consolidated civil rights actions under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). A federal prisoner's BivensNo. 98-20097 -2- action is subject to the rule of Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 489 (1994), that a prisoner challenging the fact or length of his confinement must challenge successfully the conviction or sentence, or otherwise indicate that the conviction or sentence has been declared invalid, before a possible civil rights cause of action arises. Stephenson v. Reno , 28 F.3d 26, 27-28 (5th Cir. 1994). On appeal, Garcia asserts that he is not challenging the validity of his conviction, but in his original complaint he contended that he had been falsely incarcerated by "selective prosecution". It is not possible to award Garcia monetary damages for wrongful prosecution, but allow him to remain incarcerated in violation of his constitutional rights. Garcia does not assert that his conviction has been invalidated. This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.4. Garcia is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals or pleadings filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Garcia should therefore review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
****EXHIBIT 12.2**SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES**AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS**(Dollars in millions)
Six months
ended
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
June 30, 2006
Fixed Charges:
Interest
 $          70 
 $          47 
 $          48 
 $          40 
 $          50 
 $              36 
Interest portion of annual rentals
              3 
 
              2 
 
              2 
 
              2 
 
              3 
 
                  2 
Total fixed charges
             73 
             49 
             50 
             42 
             53 
                38 
Preferred stock dividends (1)
              2 
 
              2 
 
              2 
 
              2 
 
              2 
 
                  1 
Combined fixed charges and preferred stock 
    dividends for purpose of ratio
 $          75 
 $          51 
 $          52 
 $          44 
 $          55 
 $              39 
Earnings:
Pretax income from continuing operations
           377 
           391 
           360 
           387 
           309 
               188 
Add: total fixed charges (from above)
             73 
             49 
             50 
             42 
             53 
                38 
Less:  interest capitalized 
             -   
 
             -   
 
             -   
 
             -   
 
             -   
 
                 -   
Total earnings for purpose of ratio
 $        450 
 $        440 
 $        410 
 $        429 
 $        362 
 $            226 
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges
    and preferred stock dividends
          6.00 
          8.63 
          7.88 
          9.75 
          6.58 
              5.79 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
          6.16 
          8.98 
          8.20 
        10.21 
          6.83 
              5.95 
(1)  In computing this ratio, "Preferred stock dividends" represents the before-tax earnings necessary to pay such dividends, 
computed at the effective tax rates for the applicable periods.************
**Exhibit      21.1 **

**Subsidiaries      of the Registrant **

| **Subsidiaries**                                   |   | **State                or other jurisdiction****of                incorporation or****organization** |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |   |                                                                                                 |
| InterActual                Technologies, Inc.      |   | California,                USA                                                                       |
| Sonic                IP, Inc.                      |   | California,                USA                                                                       |
| Sonic                Solutions International, Inc. |   | Delaware                                                                                             |
| MGI                Software Corp.                  |   | Canada                                                                                               |
| Live                Picture S.A.R.L.               |   | France                                                                                               |
| OLI                V R Corporation Ltd.            |   | Israel                                                                                               |
| Sonic                Solutions K. K.               |   | Japan                                                                                                |
| Sonic                Software (Shanghai) Co., Ltd  |   | PRC                (China)                                                                           |
| SystemOK                AB                         |   | Sweden                                                                                               |
| Roxio                UK, Ltd.                      |   | United                Kingdom                                                                        |
50404 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 166 / Tuesday, August 26, 2008 / Notices 

benefits,(including death compensation 

is applicable), and any accrued benefits 

not paid to the veteran prior to death. 

b. Military Casualty Assistance 

Officers complete VA Form 21–534 to 

assist surviving spouse and/or children 

of veterans who died on active duty in 

processing claims for dependency and 

indemnity compensation benefits. 

Accrued benefits and death 

compensation are not payable in claims 

for DIC. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The Federal Register 

Notice with a 60-day comment period 

soliciting comments on this collection 

of information was published on June 

10, 2008, at pages 32790–32791. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 

a. VA Form 21–534—76,136 hours. 

b. VA Form 21–534a—600 hours. 

Estimated Average Burden Per 

Respondent: 

a. VA Form 21–534—75 minutes. 

b. VA Form 21–534a—15 minutes. 

Frequency of Response: One time. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

a. VA Form 21–534—76,136. 

b. VA Form 21–534a—600. 

Dated: August 18, 2008. 

By direction of the Secretary. 

Denise McLamb, 

Program Analyst, Records Management 

Service. 

[FR Doc. E8–19737 Filed 8–25–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS 

Advisory Committee on VA Disability 

Compensation and Related Benefits; 

Notice of Establishment 

As required by Section 9(a)(2) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 

Department of Veterans Affairs hereby 

gives notice of the establishment of the 

Advisory Committee on VA Disability 

Compensation and Related Benefits. The 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs had 

determined that establishing the 

Committee is both necessary and in the 

public interest. 

The Advisory Committee on VA 

Disability Compensation and Related 

Benefits will advise the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs on establishing and 

supervising a schedule to conduct 

periodic reviews of each of the body 

systems in the VA Schedule for Rating 

Disabilities (VASRD), and to make 

recommendations on the possible 

expansion of VA benefits to address the 

impact on quality of life, the need for 

transition assistance, and the potential 

for successful rehabilitation. 

Committee members will be selected 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. The 

Committee’s membership will be 

selected from among recognized experts, 

veterans, and others with special 

competence in areas such as disability 

claims adjudication, vocational 

rehabilitation, disability programs 

management, workers’ compensation, 

rehabilitative medicine, mental health 

research, military medical services 

management, veterans’ benefits 

advocacy, and survivor benefits 

advocacy. 

Dated: August 19, 2008. 

By direction of the Secretary. 

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. E8–19659 Filed 8–25–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4329 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4329

  To designate the Federal building located at 300 East 8th Street in 
     Austin, Texas, as the ``J.J. `Jake' Pickle Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1996

   Mr. Pete Geren of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the Federal building located at 300 East 8th Street in 
     Austin, Texas, as the ``J.J. `Jake' Pickle Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 300 East 8th Street in Austin, 
Texas, shall be known and designated as the ``J.J. `Jake' Pickle 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J.J. `Jake' Pickle 
Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Sentry Petroleum Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Arne Raabe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 28th day of May, 2010.















| |     |                                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                   
| | BY: | ARNE RAABEArne Raabe, 
Principal Financial Officer



























---
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6334 

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 

allow the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into self-determination contracts with Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations to carry out supplemental nutrition assistance programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to allow the Secretary of Agriculture to 

enter into self-determination contracts with Indian Tribes 

and Tribal organizations to carry out supplemental nutrition assistance programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SNAP Tribal Food 

5 Sovereignty Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6334 IH

1 SEC. 2. SELF-DETERMINATION FOR SNAP. 

2 Title I of the Indian Self-Determination and Edu3 cation Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.) is amended 

4 by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 112. SELF-DETERMINATION FOR SNAP. 

6 ‘‘(a) AGRICULTURE SELF-DETERMINATION AUTHOR7 IZED.—The Secretary of Agriculture shall enter into self8 determination contracts, in accordance with subsection 

9 (b), with Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations, on the 

10 request of any Indian Tribe by Tribal resolution, to plan, 

11 conduct, and administer any function, service, or activity 

12 of the supplemental nutrition assistance program estab13 lished under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 

14 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for the Indian Tribe. 

15 ‘‘(b) SELF-DETERMINATION CONTRACT.—A self-de16 termination contract entered into under subsection (a) 

17 shall have the same terms and conditions, and be subject 

18 to the same procedures, regulations, and requirements, as 

19 a self-determination contract entered into under section 

20 102, except that the Secretary of Agriculture and the De21 partment of Agriculture shall be the appropriate Secretary 

22 and agency for purposes of a self-determination contract 

23 under this section. 

24 ‘‘(c) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Office of Self25 Governance of the Bureau of Indian Affairs shall provide 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6334 IH

1 technical assistance regarding the self-determination con2 tracts authorized under this section to— 

3 ‘‘(1) the Secretary of Agriculture; and 

4 ‘‘(2) Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations 

5 that request that assistance.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS