alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 12.1


                          JOHN Q. HAMMONS HOTELS, L.P.
                 HISTORICAL RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                (000's omitted)

<TABLE>
                                                 1996      1997      1998      1999      2000
                                                 ----      ----      ----      ----      ----
<S>                                             <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
HISTORICAL EARNINGS:
Income (loss) before minority interest,
 provision for income taxes, extraordinary
 item and cumulative effect of change in
 accounting principle                           $18,524   $ 8,791   $   338   $  (973)  $(2,422)

Add:
Interest, amortization or deferred
 financing fees and other fixed  charges
 (excluding interest capitalized)
                                                 36,337    45,086    58,257    63,456    75,451
                                                -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
   Historical earnings                          $54,861   $53,877   $58,595   $62,483   $73,029
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense and
 amortization of deferred
 financing fees                                 $35,620   $44,325   $57,286   $62,209   $73,833
Interest capitalized                              7,162    10,259     6,163     6,770       504
Interest element of rentals                         717       761       971     1,247     1,618
                                                -------   -------   -------   -------   -------
   Fixed charges                                $43,499   $55,345   $64,420   $70,226   $75,955
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (A)
                                                   1.26      0.97      0.91      0.89      0.96
                                                =======   =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>

(A) In computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings have been
    based on income from operations before income taxes and fixed charges
    (exclusive of interest capitalized) and fixed charges consist of interest
    and amortization of deferred financing fees (including amounts capitalized)
    and the estimated interest portion of rents (deemed to be one-third of
    rental expense).
#### Mrs. Bernice F. FULD v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY.*

No. 1774.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Jan. 11, 1938.

Weiss & Weiss, of New Orleans, and Jacob S. Landry, of New Iberia, for appellant.

Walter J. Burke and Lawrence Simon, both of New Iberia, for appellee.

*

Rehearing denied Feb. 15, 1938; ^rit of certiorari denied March 7, 1938.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons this day assigned in this case consolidated with the case of Joseph Fuld against the same defendant, La.App.,' 178 So. 201, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, at the cost of the appellant.
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002SOLERA NATIONAL BANCORP, INC.  a Delaware
corporation    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Robert J. Fenton, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of Solera National Bancorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation, do hereby certify that:



|Dated: March 27, 2008 |  | By: /s/ Robert J. FentonRobert J. Fenton
Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,502
<SECURITIES>                                    21,620
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,507    
<ALLOWANCES>                                        33
<INVENTORY>                                      1,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,973
<PP&E>                                           7,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,391
<SALES>                                          5,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,433
<CGS>                                            1,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (54)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,830)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,830)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.82)<F1><F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.82)<F1><F2>
<FN>
<F1>Includes accumulated dividends of $541,400 ($.04 per share) on Convertible
Preferred stock.
<F2>Restatement of Prior Periods not necessary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12





PG&E GAS TRANSMISSION, NORTHWEST CORPORATION





SEC FILINGFORM 10-QSecond Quarter 2002


EXHIBIT 12RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES





For the Six Months Ended2002

2001Ratio of earnings to Fixed ChargesEarningsNet income

31.3

38.0Adjustments:Income taxes

18.6

24.1Fixed charges (as below)

18.7

19.8Total adjusted earnings

68.6

81.9Fixed charges:Net interest expense

17.0

19.5Adjustments:Interest component of rents

0.2

0.2AFUDC debt

1.5

0.1Total fixed charges

18.7

19.8Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

3.7

4.1
#### Ellwyn A. Card, appellant, v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance Company, appellee.

298 N. W. 157

Filed May 16, 1941

No. 31158

*Lee Card,*for appellant.

*E. D. Crites*and *F. A. Crites, contra.*

Heard before Paine, Carter and Messmore, JJ., and Spear and Falloon, District Judges.

Spear, District Judge.

Suit on an automobile “collision” policy. Donald Fleming owned an automobile upon which Fred A. Hood, agent for defendant insurance company, had written a policy. The policy contains provisions that any waiver must be in writing; that, unless permission be given in writing, change in ownership voids the policy; and that, unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the company shall not be liable for loss while the insured property is subject to a mortgage. On January 7, 1939, Fleming sold or agreed to sell the car to the plaintiff Card. Fleming notified Hood of the transaction and Hood told him he would be entitled to a return premium. Fleming told Hood he did not want the return premium, but wanted the insurance to remain in force for *603his protection. He did not specifically ask Hood to transfer the policy to Card, although Hood knew that Card was purchasing the car. At a later date Hood delivered the policy to Fleming, without any transfer to Card and without a “loss payable” clause to Fleming. Soon thereafter a loss occurred on the automobile and the company paid $20 to Fleming to settle the loss. Apparently Fleming was at that time in possession of the car and had not transferred it to Card. On February 18, 1939, Fleming gave a bill of sale to plaintiff and plaintiff gave Fleming a chattel mortgage on the car. An accident occurred March 12, 1939. Card then procured the policy from Fleming and brought this action on the policy.

Plaintiff admits that no formal transfer was made in accordance with the terms of the policy, but contends that the circumstances constitute a waiver by defendant.

We do not think it necessary to reexamine the authorities on waiver. It is sufficient to note that Fleming is not a party to this action; that no policy was ever delivered to Card; that Card did not testify that he relied upon any waiver, nor, except by inference, that he in fact knew anything of the deal between Hood and Fleming; and that no agreement of any kind was made between defendant and Card. Under these facts plaintiff manifestly cannot maintain a suit upon the policy. The judgment of the district court in sustaining a motion to dismiss at the close of plaintiff’s evidence is

Affirmed.
Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Pdf. Copyright 2002-2014 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Pdf. Copyright 2002-2014 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Pdf. Copyright 2002-2014 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.Pdf. Copyright 2002-2014 Aspose Pty Ltd.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION* IN THE

OF MARYLAND • COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner, • OF MARYLAND V. PHILLIP G. DANTES Respondent. • Misc. Docket AG

• No. 45

• September Term, 2017 ORDER The Court of Appeals of Maryland, having consider the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission and Respondent, Phillip G. Dantes, to place Respondent on Inactive Status by Consent pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736(c), it is this 6th day of December ,2017 ORDERED, that the Joint Petition be, and it is hereby GRANTED, and the Respondent, Phillip G. Dantes, is hereby placed on Inactive Status by consent; and it is further, ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Phillip G. Dantes from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-761.

/s/ Clayton Greenet Jr. Senior Judge
4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,899
<SECURITIES>                                    15,632
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,001
<INVENTORY>                                     34,391
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,058
<PP&E>                                         104,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 187,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,004
<BONDS>                                         33,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   187,924
<SALES>                                         89,503
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,503
<CGS>                                           57,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,138)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,653)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.19)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10728

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARK LINNEAR HAYS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CV-462

USDC No. 3:95-CR-141-2

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Linnear Hays, federal prisoner # 46431-019, appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to

alter or amend its prior judgment denying Hays’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to

vacate his 1996 convictions and sentences for violating the Hobbs Act, using and

carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, and being a felon in

possession of a firearm.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 24, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-10728

2

Hays raises three arguments on appeal. First, Hays argues that the

district court erred by failing to conduct a de novo review before denying his Rule

60(b) motion. The record contradicts that argument. Relatedly, Hays asserts

that the record fails to demonstrate that the district court conducted a de novo

review when it denied his § 2255 motion in September 2000. He also asserts

that review of the merits of his ineffective assistance claim was deferred on

direct appeal and, thus, the district court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary

hearing on that claim. Hays’s claims are without merit. And, to the extent Hays

is challenging the underlying judgment denying his § 2255 motion, he is

precluded from doing so. See Hess v. Cockrell, 281 F.3d 212, 216 (5th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, Hays’s first argument fails.

Second, Hays argues that the District Court should have held an

evidentiary hearing in considering his Rule 60(b) motion. Hays has not cited any

authority for the proposition that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on

his Rule 60(b) motion. We likewise find none. Accordingly, Hays’s second

argument fails.

Third, Hays argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying

his Rule 60(b) motion . See Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th

Cir. 1981). Having considered the record and relevant law, we find no abuse of

discretion. Accordingly, Hays’s third argument fails. See id.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                              PROTECTION ONE, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               PROTECTION ONE                    PREDECESSOR
                                                                               --------------                    -----------
                                                                                                                  53 WEEKS
                                                      YEAR ENDED  YEAR ENDED  YEAR ENDED  YEAR ENDED  YEAR ENDED    ENDED
                                                       DECEMBER    DECEMBER    DECEMBER    DECEMBER    DECEMBER   DECEMBER
                                                       31, 2000    31, 1999    31, 1998    31, 1997    31, 1996   30, 1996
                                                       --------    --------    --------    --------    --------   --------
<S>                                                    <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings:
    Net loss                                           $(57,171)   $(80,736)   $(17,833)  $(42,315)      $(656)    $(4,860)
    Adjustments:
         Extraordinary (gain) loss                      (49,273)      1,691      (1,591)    --          --          --
         Consolidated provision for income taxes         35,872      27,108       3,689     28,405        (310)     (2,978)
         Fixed charges less interest income              60,332      87,037      56,129     33,483          15      10,879
                                                       --------    --------    --------   --------    --------    --------

Earnings as adjusted (A)                                (10,240)     35,100      40,394     19,573        (951)      3,041
                                                       ========    ========    ========   ========    ========    ========


Fixed Charges:
    Interest on debt and capitalized leases              59,322      84,691      55,990     33,483          15      10,879
    Amortization of deferred financing costs              1,010       2,346         139     --          --          --
                                                       --------    --------    --------   --------    --------    --------

Fixed Charges (B)                                        60,332      87,037      56,129     33,483          15      10,879
                                                       ========    ========    ========   ========    ========    ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (A) divided by (B)

Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges                  70,572      51,937      15,735     13,910         966       7,838
</TABLE>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3063521-JUN-201108:43 AM
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 22, 2014

No. 04-13-00366-CR

Daniel James WEEMS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR6570

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The State’s Motion for Leave to File Post-Submission Supplemental Brief is hereby 

GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on the 22nd day of April, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of LILM, Inc. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George I. Norman, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   George I. Norman, III





George I. Norman, III


Chief Executive Officer


March 30, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-K solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>  THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM
THE CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME, BALANCE SHEET, AND CASH FLOWS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<CIK> 0000075527
<NAME> PACIFIC ENTERPRISES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,250
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         55
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,035
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           668
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      85
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,093
<COMMON>                                         1,096
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                218
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   1,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        188
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             1,279
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  84
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      106
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,175
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    5,093
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,745
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               110
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                           0
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,440
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            331
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                       0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            84
<NET-INCOME>                                       137
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          8
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      129
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57

        

</TABLE>