alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas W. Hyde, certify that:

- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
ADKINS —ARMY 20090346

**UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS**

Before

CONN, HOFFMAN, and GIFFORD

Appellate Military Judges

**UNITED STATES, Appellee**

**v.**

**Private E1 ERIC L. ADKINS**

**United States Army, Appellant**

ARMY 20090346

Headquarters, Fort Carson 

Debra L. Boudreau, Military Judge

Colonel Michael W. Meier, Staff Judge Advocate

For Appellant:  Colonel Mark Tellitocci, JA; Lieutenant Colonel Matthew M. Miller, JA; Major Grace M. Gallagher, JA; Captain Pamela Perillo, JA (on brief).

For Appellee:  Lieutenant Colonel Francis C. Kiley, JA; Major Charles C. Choi, JA (on brief).

13 April 2010

--------------------------------

SUMMARY DISPOSITION

--------------------------------

Per Curiam:

	Appellant asserts the staff judge advocate (SJA)’s addendum prejudiced him by failing to address his assertion of legal error in his Rule for Courts-Martial [hereinafter R.C.M.] 1105 matters, to wit:  after his trial, when he reached the Naval Brig Charleston, appellant was placed in maximum confinement where he sat “alone in a cell” for eight days for “no good reason.”  Appellant asserts this court may examine alleged error to determine whether the SJA’s failure to comment violated appellant’s substantial rights, and this court must remedy those legal errors it finds meritorious.  *United States v. Welker,* 44 M.J. 85, 89 (C.A.A.F. 1996).  

	First, we note that appellant’s complete R.C.M. 1105 submission including this allegation was presented to the convening authority.  Further, in his addendum, the SJA opined “no corrective action on the findings or sentence is required.”  Thus, the minimal requirements of R.C.M. 1106(d)(4) were satisfied.  *See United States v. Catrett*, 55 M.J. 400, 407-08 (C.A.A.F. 2001).  

	Second, we hold that even if trial defense counsel’s statement regarding maximum custody solitary detention amounted to an assertion of legal error and the SJA erred in not commenting on it, the allegation lacked merit.  *See United States v. Avila*, 53 M.J. 99, 101 (C.A.A.F. 2000) (“Solitary confinement, *per se,* has not been held to violate the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause.”); *also United States v. Ney,*68 M.J. 613 (Army Ct. Crim. App. 2010) (mere assertion of punitive impact of post-trial confinement insufficient to support allegation of cruel or unusual punishment).  Thus, returning the case to the SJA and convening authority is not necessary.  *See**United States v. Hill*, 27 M.J. 293, 296-97 (C.M.A. 1988); *United States v. Williams-Oatman*, 38 M.J. 602, 604 (A.C.M.R. 1993). 

We have considered the matters personally raised by appellant under *United States v. Grostefon*, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), and find them without merit. The

findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.

						FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.

						Clerk of Court 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          61,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,683
<INVENTORY>                                     19,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,850
<PP&E>                                          29,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,083
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,932
<SALES>                                        159,882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,588
<CGS>                                           91,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,625
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DIANA RUIZ ESPARZA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL 

PASO,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00259-CV

Appeal from the

210th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC#2012DCV02870)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

trial court’s judgment dismissing Appellant’s age, sex, and national origin discrimination claims. 

We therefore reverse the trial court’s judgment dismissing Appellant’s age, sex, and national 

origin discrimination claims to the extent they are not based on disparate pay, and remand those

claims to the trial court to afford Appellant the opportunity to amend her pleadings, in 

accordance with the opinion of the Court.

We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Appellant’s claims for disparate pay, hostile work 

environment, and retaliation.

We further order that Appellant and Appellee each pay one-half (1/2) the costs in this 

Court, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 165 (Monday, August 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 50049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19440]



[[Page 50049]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the AIDS Research Advisory Committee, NIAID.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: AIDS Research Advisory Committee, NIAID; AIDS 
Vaccine Research Subcommittee.
    Date: September 16-17, 2008.
    Time: September 16, 2008, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To discuss the implication of recent vaccine trial 
results for future HIV vaccine development.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: September 17, 2008, 8:30 a.m. to Adjourned
    Agenda: To discuss the implication of recent vaccine trail 
results for future HIV vaccine development.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Conference Rooms E1/E2, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: James A. Bradac, PhD, Program Official, 
Preclinical Research and Development Branch, Division of AIDS, Room 
5116, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7628, 301-435-3754, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f252d3d2e2b2e2c0f222e26236121262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="18727a6a797c797b587579717436767170367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 15, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-19440 Filed 8-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 15.4





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd


No. 2 Disheng Middle Road


Beijing Economic-Technological Development Area


Beijing 100176


P.R. China





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-170811) of Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd (the “Company”) of our reports dated September 20, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.





/S/BDO Limited





BDO Limited


Hong Kong





September 20, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2871] 

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR section 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by September 4, 2008. See section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions have expired. 

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of High-Cost Universal Service Support (WC Docket No. 05-337) Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service (CC Docket No. 96-45).                 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8-19180 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-95431, No. 333-33938, No. 333-43196, No. 333-44128,No. 333-58916 and 333-133188) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-09135,No. 333-57141, 333-40940, No. 333-65084 and No. 333-106280,333-125961, 333-133185, and 333-134781 of NMS Communications Corporationof our report dated March 16, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financialstatement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston, MassachusettsMarch 16, 2007

----
exv4wgg






AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

OPTIONAL GUARANTEED LIVING BENEFIT

EXTENSION ENDORSEMENT DATA PAGE



Notwithstanding any provision in the Contract or Certificate (“Contract”) to the contrary, this
Endorsement Data Page becomes a part of the Contract to which it is attached. Should any provision
in this Endorsement Data Page conflict with the Contract, the provisions of this Endorsement Data
Page will prevail.



Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Optional Guaranteed Living Benefit
Endorsement, the terms of this Extension Endorsement Data Page replaces the corresponding terms of
the Endorsement Data Page of the original Optional Guaranteed Living Benefit Endorsement.




	 	 	 

	COVERED PERSON(S):

	 	[John Doe]
¬1
	 
	 	 
	ENDORSEMENT EFFECTIVE DATE:

	 	[November 1, 2013] ¬1
	 
	 	 
	EXTENSION AVAILABILITY DATE:

	 	[November 1, 2018] ¬1
	 
	 	 
	ENDORSEMENT FEE:

	 	Annual fee of [1.25%]
¬2 of the Income Base deducted quarterly
from Contract Value beginning one quarter following the
Endorsement Effective Date and ending on the termination of this
Endorsement
	 
	 	 
	INCOME BASE EVALUATION PERIOD:

	 	Beginning on the Endorsement
Effective Date and ending
[5]¬3
years later
	 
	 	 
	[[GROSS] INCOME CREDIT PERCENTAGE:

	 	[6%] ¬4
	 
	 	 
	INCOME CREDIT PERIOD:

	 	Beginning on the Endorsement
Effective Date and ending [5] ¬3
years later
	 
	 	 
	INCOME CREDIT AVAILABILITY: 

	 	At the end of each Benefit Year during the Income Credit Period [if
withdrawals were not taken during the previous Benefit Year.]
¬5]
¬6






For Inquiries Call [1-800-445-7862] ¬7



Signed for the Company to be effective on the Endorsement Effective Date.










ASE-6231E (8/13)


1
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6199 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6199

 To revise the boundary of the Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park 
           in the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2021

Mr. Smith of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To revise the boundary of the Ste. Genevieve National Historical Park 
           in the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ste. Genevieve National Historical 
Park Boundary Revision Act''.

SEC. 2. STE. GENEVIEVE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    (a) Map.--Section 7134(a)(3) of appendix C of the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2018 (16 U.S.C. 410xxx(a)(3)), is amended by 
striking ``numbered 571/149,942, and dated December 2018'' and 
inserting ``numbered 571/177,464, and dated September 2021''.
    (b) Authority To Correct Errors in Map.--Section 7134(d) of 
appendix C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (16 U.S.C. 
410xxx(d)), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Map'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Map''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Authority to correct errors.--The Secretary may 
        correct any clerical or typographical errors in the Map.''.
    (c) Visitor Center.--Section 7134(e) of appendix C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (16 U.S.C. 410xxx(e)), is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Visitor center.--The Secretary--
                    ``(A) may acquire, by donation, the land (including 
                any improvements to the land) owned by the city of Ste. 
                Genevieve, Missouri, and used as the visitor center for 
                the Historical Park, as generally depicted on the Map 
                as `Proposed Boundary Addition'; and
                    ``(B) on acquisition of the land described in 
                subparagraph (A), shall revise the boundary of the 
                Historical Park to include the acquired land.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Surfect Holdings, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven
      Anderson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


Dated: May 1, 2007
              /s/
                  Steven Anderson
                Steven
                  Anderson
                President
                  and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P (the “Partnership”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





/s/ James G. JacksonJames G. JacksonChief Financial Officer of BreitBurn GP, LLCDated: March 9, 2011