alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6267 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6267

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 15 Chestnut Street in Suffern, New York, as the ``Sergeant Gerald T. 
                    `Jerry' Donnellan Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2021

   Mr. Jones (for himself, Mr. Suozzi, Ms. Meng, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. 
 Jeffries, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Nadler, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney 
 of New York, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Torres of New York, Mr. Sean Patrick 
     Maloney of New York, Mr. Delgado, and Mr. Jacobs of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 15 Chestnut Street in Suffern, New York, as the ``Sergeant Gerald T. 
                    `Jerry' Donnellan Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT GERALD T. ``JERRY'' DONNELLAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 Chestnut Street in Suffern, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Gerald T. `Jerry' Donnellan Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Gerald T. `Jerry' Donnellan Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Chief Financial Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:
(1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2006 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934;  and
(2)     information  contained  in  the  Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.
Dated: May 15, 2006
                                   /s/ Mitchell Binder
                                   -------------------
                                   Mitchell Binder
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
#### CULVERHOUSE v. STREUN et al.

No. 6186.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1941.

E. W. & P. N. Browne and G. M. Boden-heimer, all of Shreveport, for appellants.

Coleman & Morgan and Booth & Loclc-ard, all of Shreveport, for appellee.

HAMITER, Judge.

The plaintiff herein was awarded $1,075 for the damages sustained by him in the accident described in Stevens v. Streun, 200 So. 182, this day decided by us. Of that amount $325 was for the damages that his truck experienced, and the balance *186was for his physical and mental pain and suffering. The evidence *supports*this award; and for the reasons assigned in the opinion of the mentioned cause the judgment is. affirmed.
# FILED
September 9, 1996 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON

For Publication STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Filed: _9/9/96________ Appellee, )

) ) Vs. ) Shelby Criminal ) ) RICHARD ODOM, a/k/a ) No. 02-S-01-9502-CR-000 14 OTIS SMITH, ) ) Appellant. )

ORD ER O N PE TIT ION TO RE HEAR
The State has requested a reheari ng in this case. The Cour t has considered the petition and finds it to be without merit. The petition to rehear is denied. The Members of the Court adher e to the positions stated in the original Opinions in this cause.

It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick M. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick M. Murphy                       
|Patrick M. Murphy                           
|Senior Vice President,                      
|Chief Financial Officer,                    
|Secretary and Treasurer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|Date: May 10, 2005                          



22
#### Alton B. HORNBACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5074.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 2, 2001.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

The court has received a March 28, 2001 order from the Court of Federal Claims.

On March 8, 2001, the Court of Federal Claims dismissed Alton B. Hornback’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Horn-back appealed on March 19, 2001. The trial court’s March 28 order states, in part:

This court has determined that its March 8, 2001, opinion and order contains errors that arise from oversight and omission. The court failed to accurately characterize and respond to plaintiffs contentions as set forth in the complaint and in plaintiffs response to defendant’s motion to dismiss____

It would seem an inefficient waste of judicial resources to proceed with appellate review of an opinion and order that this court recognizes is erroneous and stands ready to correct. Accordingly, this court requests that the Federal Circuit remand this action back to this court so as to permit this court to correct the errors contained in its March 8, 2001, opinion and order....

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The request is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Federal Claims for further proceedings.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of the President Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of China RuiTai International Holdings Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dian Min Ma, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Dian Min MaChief Executive Officer Date: November 18, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1
 PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2009, of Parker Drilling Company (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 14d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions);
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
#### Isaac N. Miller, Appellant, v. Marcella Buchanan, Individually and as Executrix, etc., of Alexina S. Buchanan, Deceased, and Others, Respondents.

Judgment modified by allowing' interest from March, 1900, and as modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. No opinion. Settle order on notice.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6183 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a credit against 

tax, or refund of tax, for certain Federal insurance taxes for employees 

who are members of religious faiths which oppose participation in such 

insurance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 8, 2021 

Mr. GIBBS (for himself and Mr. BALDERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for a credit against tax, or refund of tax, for certain 

Federal insurance taxes for employees who are members 

of religious faiths which oppose participation in such 

insurance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Exemptions 

5 for Social Security and Healthcare Taxes Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6183 IH

1 SEC. 2. CREDIT OR REFUND OF CERTAIN FEDERAL INSUR2 ANCE TAXES FOR MEMBERS OF CERTAIN RE3 LIGIOUS FAITHS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6413 of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(e) CREDIT OR REFUNDS OF CERTAIN FEDERAL IN8 SURANCE TAXES FOR MEMBERS OF CERTAIN RELIGIOUS

9 FAITHS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An employee who receives 

11 wages with respect to which the tax imposed by sec12 tion 3101 is deducted during a taxable year for 

13 which an authorization granted under this sub14 section applies shall be entitled (subject to the provi15 sions of section 31(b)) to a credit or refund of the 

16 amount of tax so deducted. 

17 ‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION FOR CREDIT OR RE18 FUND.—Any individual may file an application for 

19 authorization under this subsection if he is an indi20 vidual described in the first sentence of section 

21 1402(g)(1). Rules similar to the rules of 1402(g)(1) 

22 shall apply to the granting of such authorization and 

23 rules similar to section 1402(g)(2) shall apply with 

24 respect to the period for which such authorization is 

25 in effect.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6183 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply with respect to taxable years begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
197 La. 712

#### In re DELTA DEVELOPMENT CO., Inc., et al.

No. 36141.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1941.

Fred A. Middleton, of New Orleans, for relators.

Eugene Stanley, Atty. Gen., J. Bernard Cocke, Dist. Atty., of New Orleans, and W. C. Perrault, Asst. Atty. Gen. (James J. Morrison and L. F. Wingerter, both of New Orleans, of counsel), for respondents.

PONDER, Justice.

This is a companion case to In re Louisiana Coastal Lands, Inc., et al., 2 So.2d 184. The issues and facts in both cases are identical, and the only difference between them is that different defendants are involved.

For the reasons assigned in In re Louisiana Coastal Lands, Inc., et al., 2 So.2d 184, this cause is remanded to the lower court in order that the subpoena duces tecum may be modified consistent with the views therein expressed.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice

(concurring).

I concur in the opinion that the judge of the criminal district court should modify his order to produce the books and records of the corporation, so as to make the order a reasonable one; but, inasmuch as this investigation is in the nature of a criminal proceeding, being conducted under the provisions of article 156 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I do not consider the articles of the Code of Practice, relating to writs of subpoena duces tecum, as being applicable to this case.
Exhibit 32.1




                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Peter P. Gombrich, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of
Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

Date:  November 19, 2003

                                                 /s/  Peter P. Gombrich
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Peter P. Gombrich


NOTE:  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Molecular
Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by law,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Debara A. Dickershaid, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[678 NYS2d 408]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 24, 1997, which, *inter alia,*ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her employment as a coordinator because she believed that her branch manager was selling drugs out of the office. After claimant informed the area manager of her concerns regarding the drug activity in the office, the branch manager was discharged; however, claimant refused the employer’s offer to withdraw her resignation and continue her employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant’s subsequent application for benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We affirm. Although claimant initially may have had good cause to tender her resignation, claimant refused to continue working after the employer resolved the problem by discharging the branch manager. Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision *(see generally, Matter of Turano [Sweeney],*239 AD2d 747). Furthermore, although claimant asserts that she was under the care of a doctor due to stress, she admitted that she received no medical advice to leave her employment *(see, Matter of Robinson [Sweeney],*245 AD2d 939, 940). Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Crew III and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Jason Liddell, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Depositor, Inc., onbehalf of PPLUS Trust Series LTD-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;     4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, theservicer(s) has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all materialrespects; and     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and its officers and agents.        Date: March 26, 2007 /s/Jason Liddell  Vice President
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 15, 2008 Before DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

520 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE ] Appeal from the United ASSOCIATES, LTD., doing business ] States District Court for as THE CONGRESS PLAZA HOTEL & ] the Northern District of CONVENTION CENTER, ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiff-Appellant, ] ] No. 06 C 4552 No. 07-3377 v. ] ] Joan Humphrey Lefkow, CATHERINE SHANNON, Director of ] Judge. the Illinois Department of Labor, ] Defendant-Appellee, ] and, ] ] UNITE HERE LOCAL 1, ] Intervenor-Appellee. ] ]

The opinion issued on December 15, 2008, in the above-entitled case is AMENDED as to the spelling of the district court judge’s name. The name should be reflected as Joan Humphrey Lefkow, Judge.