alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF 1997 ENDED
SEPTEMBER 26, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                           3,174
<SECURITIES>                                     1,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,355
<INVENTORY>                                     54,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,795
<PP&E>                                         123,267
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 220,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,375
<BONDS>                                         70,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,382
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   220,800
<SALES>                                        227,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,744
<CGS>                                          154,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   476
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,409
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,384)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,025
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (13,563)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,538)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.36)
        

</TABLE>
#### ABADIE, for Use of ABADIE, v. TEXAS & N. O. R. CO.*

No. 14518.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 10, 1933.

Lemle, Moreno & Lemle, of New Orleans, R. Y. Fletcher, of Chicago, Ill., and Charles N. Burch, H. D. Minor, and Clinton H. McKay, all of Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

James G. Schillin, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

*

Rehearing denied May 22, 1933.

JANVIER, Judge.

Plaintiff brings this suit on behalf of his •minor daughter, Margaret Abadie, and he seeks to recover for her for injuries sustained when the automobile truck in which she was riding crashed into the center supporting pier of an overhead railroad trestle near Harahan, La. The suit was originally filed against the Texas *&*New Orleans Railroad Company, but later, by amendment, the Illinois Central Railroad Company was made party defendant.

In the matter of Frank J. Becker v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 147 So. 378, decided by us to-day, we held that the proximate cause of the collision was the negligence of the driver of the truck, in that he was operating it at a very fast rate of speed, and because manifestly he failed to look ahead as he approached the overhead crossing. Y/e denied recovery to the owner of the truck. Since tlm truck had been taken without the consent of the owner, no contributory negligence of the driver could be chargeable to or imputed to the owner, and we held that recovery should be denied solely on the ground that the railroad company was guilty of no actionable negligence and that the driver’s negligence, as above set forth, was the proximate cause of the accident.

The only difference between this case and that is that here it is charged that plaintiff’s daughter was herself guilty of contributory negligence because she made no protest at the excessive speed, nor at the failure of the driver to focus his attention on the road ahead, and it is also asserted that all the persons in the cab of the automobile truck were negligent because four of them had crowded into a space intended for only two and had .thus interfered with the driver in his manipulation of the steering wheel, levers, and pedals.

Since the sole legal cause of the accident was the carelessness of the driver of the truck, and since no actionable negligence is chargeable to the defendant, it is not important that we determine whether plaintiff’s daughter was or was not at fault in any of the particulars set forth.

In the district court, judgment was rendered for plaintiff for $3,000. Since we feel that there is no liability, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and it is, annulled, avoided, and reversed, and that plaintiff’s suit be dismissed at his cost.

Reversed.

. For written reasons stated in Frank J. Becker v. Illinois Central R. Co. (La. App.) 147 So. 378, decided this day:

"WESTERFIELD, J., dissents.

HIGGINS, J., concurs.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
 
             STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                                        FOR THE YEARS
                                                        ENDED MARCH 31,
                                               -------------------------------
                                                 1997       1996       1995
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
                                               (IN THOUSANDS,)EXCEPT PER SHARE
                                                           AMOUNTS
 
Weighted Average Number of Shares
  of Common Stock Outstanding                      14,959     14,779     14,769
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options                  --         --         --
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding               14,959     14,779     14,769
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Net Loss from Continuing Operations            $  (9,881) $  (7,648) $  (5,929)
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Net Loss                                       $  (9,881) $  (7,648) $  (5,929)
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Net Loss Per Share From
  Continuing Operations                        $    (.66) $    (.52) $    (.40)
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
 
Net Loss Per Share                             $    (.66) $    (.52) $    (.40)
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 29, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nigel Travis, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 27, 2013








/s/ Nigel TravisNigel Travis*Chief Executive Officer








*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and will be retained by Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Caroline E. McManus, Respondent, v. The City of Troy, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER-ENDED JUNE 30,2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             454
<SECURITIES>                                     6,501
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                       899
<INVENTORY>                                     29,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,320
<PP&E>                                         112,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,115
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,948
<BONDS>                                         28,053
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           143
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,285
<SALES>                                         99,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,684
<CGS>                                           67,512
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   899
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (209)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,440
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6058 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6058

 To extend the authority of the Secretary of Defense to transfer funds 
for a certain study on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance contamination 
               in drinking water, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2021

   Ms. Dean introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authority of the Secretary of Defense to transfer funds 
for a certain study on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance contamination 
               in drinking water, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PFAS Health Study Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE TO TRANSFER 
              FUNDS FOR A CERTAIN STUDY ON PER- AND POLYFLUOROALKYL 
              SUBSTANCE CONTAMINATION IN DRINKING WATER.

    Section 316(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91; 131 Stat. 1350), as amended by 
section 315(a) of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232; 132 Stat. 1713), section 321 
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public 
Law 116-92; 133 Stat. 1307), and section 337 of the William M. (Mac) 
Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 
(Public Law 116-283), is further amended by striking ``fiscal years 
2019, 2020, and 2021'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2019 through 
2023''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
NEIL L. WHITESELL; NLW HOLDINGS, ) LLC; WHITESELL CORPORATION; and ) WHITESELL PRECISION COMPONENTS, ) INC. ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3401 ) BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE ) AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; WHITESELL ) FORMED COMPONENTS, INC.; and ) WHITESELL CANADA CORPORATION, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed February 28, 2018 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Lauren L. Brodie, Judge. Steve I. Silverman, Alan J. Kluger, Erin E. Bohannon, and Christina M. Himmel of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine, P.L., Miami; and Alex Figares and Edmond E. Koester of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., Naples; and Lewis J. Liman and Thomas J. Moloney of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, New York, for Appellants. Nicholas P. Mizell, Edward K. Cheffy, and Maria Vigilante of Cheffy Passidomo, P.A., Naples; and George Zimmerman, Jonathan L. Frank, Colm P. McInerney, and Julie E. Cohen, of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher- 2 -

& Flom LLP, New York, New York, for Appellee Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft. No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
#### Luigi Sciaresa, Respondent, v. St. Lawrence Pyrites Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

PG&E GAS TRANSMISSION, NORTHWEST CORPORATION
SEC FILING - FORM 10-Q - Second Quarter 2000
EXHIBIT 12 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                                             For the Six Months Ended
                                           ----------------------------
Ratio of earnings to Fixed Charges           2000                1999
----------------------------------         --------            --------

Earnings
     Net income                              27.2                24.9
Adjustments:
     Income taxes                            17.2                15.4
     Fixed charges (as below)                20.7                21.2
                                           ------              ------
          Total adjusted earnings            65.1                61.5
                                           ======              ======


Fixed charges:
     Net interest expense                    20.4                20.5
Adjustments:
     Interest component of rents              0.0                 0.0
     AFUDC debt                               0.3                 0.7
                                           ------              ------
          Total fixed charges                20.7                21.2
                                           ======              ======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            3.1                 2.9
                                           ======              ======
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 99.1


                                WRITTEN STATEMENT

         In  connection   with  the  amended  Annual  Report  of  Electric  Fuel
Corporation  (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Robert S.
Ehrlich,  Chairman,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  hereby  certify that to my  knowledge,  the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of  1934,  and the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Electric Fuel Corporation and will be retained by Electric Fuel
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




                         By:             /S/ ROBERT S. EHRLICH
                              ------------------------------------------------
                               Robert S. Ehrlich, Chairman, President and CEO
                               (Chief Executive Officer)

Date:  May 8, 2003



<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
 WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 S/No.
    
    Name of Subsidiary
    
    Place of Incorporation1.
    
    WNS Global Services Netherlands Cooperative U.A.
    
    The Netherlands2.
    
    WNS North America Inc.
    
    USA3.
    
    WNS Global Services (UK) Limited
    
    United Kingdom4.
    
    WNS (Mauritius) Limited
    
    Mauritius5.
    
    Town & Country Assistance Limited
    
    United Kingdom6.
    
    WNS Global Services (Romania) S.R.L.
    
    Romania7.
    
    WNS Mortgage Services Private Limited
    
    India8.
    
    Flovate Technologies Limited
    
    United Kingdom9.
    
    Flovate Software Technologies India Private Limited
    
    India10.
    
    WNS Global Services Private Limited
    
    India11.
    
    Ntrance Customer Services Private Limited
    
    India12.
    
    WNS Global Services Private Limited
    
    Sri Lanka13.
    
    WNS Customer Solutions Private Limited
    
    Sri Lanka14.
    
    Marketics (Technologies) India Private Limited
    
    India15.
    
    Marketics, Inc.
    
    USA
#### Ex Parte William E. Rowland.

No. 24985.

February 7, 1951.

*Bracewell and Wright,*and *E. R. Wright,*Huntsville, for relator.

*Willis E. Gresham,*Assistant Attorney General, and *George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

By proper procedure relator seeks to secure his release from the penitentitary and alleges two grounds therefor.

It is set out and shown by evidence that relator was convicted in Cause No. 2829 in the district court of Karnes County, Texas, under and by virtue of an indictment dated May 18, 1945, charging him with felony theft. The record shows that he pleaded guilty and was by the court found guilty on the 19th day of June, 1945, and assessed a penalty of “confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than five years.” This judgment is void as it originally appeared on the record but has been corrected by nunc pro tunc order duly entered.

It is also shown by the record that appellant was convicted in the district court of Bexar County, Cause No. 48149, on the 21st day of June, 1945, on a charge of forgery. The judgment shows that he pleaded guilty to the court and waived a jury; that he was found guilty as charged “and should be punished by confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of not less than Two, nor more than Three years.” This judgment is void and can not be authority for holding relator in the penitentiary unless it be shown that same has been corrected by nunc pro tunc order entered of record.

Relator further seeks his release by virtue of his claim for *436credit for time served in the Federal penitentiary. For the reasons set forth in Ex Parte Spears, No. 25,705, 154 Tex. Cr. Rep. 112, this claim is without merit.

It is the order of the court that relator’s application for discharge be refused in so far as the judgment in the Karnes County cause and his claim for credit because of time served in the Federal penitentiary are concerned and he is ordered remanded to the penitentiary authorities to serve the term imposed upon him by the conviction in Karnes County, 81st Judicial District Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             345
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,558
<PP&E>                                          92,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,282
<BONDS>                                         41,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,935
<SALES>                                         72,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,140
<CGS>                                           46,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 972
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,124)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        

</TABLE>