alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEON PLATT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 35 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEON PLATT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 36 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEON PLATT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 37 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[35 WAL 2023, 36 WAL 2023 and 37 WAL 2023] - 2

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6065 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6065

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to release a reversionary interest 
           in certain real property, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2021

 Mr. Turner (for himself, Mr. Davidson, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Ryan, 
 and Mr. Chabot) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
 on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Energy to release a reversionary interest 
           in certain real property, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Providing Opportunities for Wider 
Economic Revitalization Act'' or the ``POWER Act''.

SEC. 2. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, 
              SPRINGFIELD, OHIO.

    (a) Release of Reversionary Interest Authorized.--Subject to 
subsection (b), the Secretary of Energy may release, without 
reimbursement or other consideration, a reversionary interest acquired 
by the United States when the National Nuclear Security Administration 
made a grant to support the acquisition of real property and 
construction of infrastructure located at 4170 Allium Court in 
Springfield, Ohio.
    (b) Condition on Release.--The authority of the Secretary of Energy 
to release the reversionary interest described in subsection (a) is 
conditioned on, and may be exercised only after, the acquisition of 
title to the real property subject to the reversionary interest by the 
Community Improvement Corporation of Clark County, a nonprofit entity 
created by the City of Springfield, Ohio, Clark County, Ohio, and the 
Chamber of Commerce in the County.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES L. BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant,

v. STATE OF KANSAS, Respondent - Appellee. No. 13-3002 (D.C. No. 5:12- CV-03206-SAC) (D. Kan.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *

Before LUCERO , McKAY , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

James Brown filed several pro se motions in federal district court while detained and awaiting trial in Kansas state court. Th e district court constr ued Brown’s filings as seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Se e Gallagher v. Shelton, 587 F.3d 1063, 1067 (10th Cir. 2009) (pro se filings must be construed liberally). Because Brown sought

federal court interference in an ongoing state court proceeding, the district court held that Brown’s claims were barred by Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). It further

concluded that Brown did not show that any of Younger’s exceptions applied. See

* This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### July 10, 2013

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court-2- Phelps v. Hamilton, 122 F.3d 885, 889 (10th Cir. 1997) (You nger does not bar relief “in cases of proven harassment or prosecutions u ndertaken by state officials in bad faith without hope of obtaining a valid conviction and perhap s in other extraordinary circumstances where irreparable injury can be shown” (quotation omitted)). The district court denied relief and denied a certificate of appealability (“COA”). Brown seeks to appeal that decision. A state prisoner may not appeal the denial of habeas relief under § 2241 without a COA. See Montez v. McKinna, 208 F.3d 862, 867 (10th Cir. 2000). We will issu e a COA “only if the applic ant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional righ t.” § 2253(c)(2). This standard requires Brown to show “that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encour agement to proceed further.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (quotations omitted). On appeal, Brown wholly fails to address the basis for th e district court’s ruling.

He does not contest the court’s characterizati on of his filings as se eking § 2241 relief.

Nor does he address the district court’s c onclusion that Younger abstention bars his claims. Although we must construe Brown’s pr o se papers liberally, “our role is not to act as his advocate.” Gallagher, 587 F.3d at 1067. Brown has failed to advance any reasoned argument challenging the district court’s decision. Accordingly, we DENY a COA and DISMISS the appeal. We also DENY his motion to proceed in forma pauperis given the lack of “a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of-3- the issues raised on appeal.” DeBardeleben v. Quinlan, 937 F.2d 502, 505 (10th Cir. 1991).

Entered for the Court

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32

Certification pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Robert E. Kernan, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer and Menzo D. Case,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Seneca-Cayuga Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) each certify in their capacity as officers of the Company that they have reviewed the annual report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2006 and that to the best of their knowledge:



|1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |                                                     
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|March 29, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert E. Kernan, Jr.                           
|Date           |  | Robert E. Kernan, Jr.                               
|               |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer     
|               | 
|March 29, 2007 |  | /s/ Menzo D. Case                                   
|Date           |  | Menzo D. Case                                       
|               |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Seneca-Cayuga Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Seneca-Cayuga Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### KNIGHT v. STATE.

4 Div. 811.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 9, 1935.

J. N. Mullins, of Dothan, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions.

The indictment was murder, and-the verdict of the jury was the basis for the judgment of the court, as follows:

> “ ‘We, the jury, find the defendant, Comer Knight, guilty of murder in the second degree and fix his sentence at 45 years,’ and it is therefore the judgment of the court that the defendant, Comer Knight, is guilty of murder in the second degree and his punishment is fixed by the court at imprisonment in the penitentiary of the State of Alabama for a period of forty-five years, and,

> “The defendant, being in open court with his attorney, and being asked by the court if he had anything to say why the sentence of the law should not now be pronounced upon him, says nothing, and it is thereupon considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the defendant, Comer Knight, be and he is hereby sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary of the State of Alabama for a period of forty-five (45) years.”

The verdict rendered is clear and unambiguous, and expresses the finding of the jury under the evidence and the statute. Section 4457, Code.

The judgment of the circuit court, under the law, was accordingly pronounced and entered.

The employing of the words “fix his sentence at 45 years” is sufficient, under the statute and the rule of our cases. Ruff v. State, 229 Ala. 649, 159 So. 94; Lewis v. State, 51 Ala. 1.

No other question being presented by the record proper, and there being no bill of exceptions, it follows the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, O. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Dennis  Sunshine, Chief Executive Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:
(1)     the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2009 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934;  and
(2)     information  contained  in  the  Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: May 15, 2009
                                   /s/ Dennis Sunshine
                                   -------------------
                                   Dennis Sunshine
                                   Chief Executive Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
#### In the Matter of Acquiring Title by the City of New York to Certain Lands and Premises Situated on the Southerly Side of Conover Street, between Walcott and Sullivan Streets, in the Borough of Brooklyn, Duly Selected as a Site for School Purposes According to Law.

Motion granted and order signed. Present —Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                          Soligen Technologies, Inc.

                      Computation of Net Loss Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
                                           -------------------------------------
                                               1999                    1998
                                           --------------          -------------
<S>                                        <C>                     <C>
Weighted average number
   of common shares                            32,682,000             32,351,000

Net loss                                    $ (1,718,000)          $   (969,000)

Net loss per share (basic and diluted)          $  (0.05)              $  (0.03)
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 829 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 829

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel CHRISSY.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1995

Mr. Torkildsen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel CHRISSY.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel CHRISSY (State of 
Maine registration number 4778B).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 606 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 201(b) of 
the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-
419, approved October 16, 1992), is amended as follows:
            (1) In paragraph (2), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (2) In paragraph (4), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (3) In paragraph (5), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (4) In paragraph (6), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (5) In paragraph (7), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 28, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 606

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
**Annual
      Statement of Compliance**


**SACO
      I Trust 2006-4**




VIA:
      EMAIL




Bear
      Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC


383
      Madison Avenue


New
      York,
      New York10179


regabnotifications@bear.com




EMC
      Mortgage Corporation


909
      Hidden Ridge Drive


Irving,
      Texas75038






Re:  The
      Pooling and Servicing agreement dated as of March 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”),
      among Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc., as Depositor and Purchaser,
      EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Sponsor and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
      National Association, as Trustee.




I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:




(1) A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar
      year
      and of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under
      my
      supervision; and




(2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled
      all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
      such
      year or a portion thereof.






Date: February
      1, 2007




LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee




/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
Order entered February 18, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 20 - 00197 - CR TYRAN DARNELL SHUMAT E, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 2 04t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 15 - 75398 - Q



### O RDER Tryan Darnell Shumate timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. See Taylor v. State , 424 S.W.3d 39, 44

- 45 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2014). We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is entitled to court

- appo inted counsel in this appeal. If the trial court finds that appellant is entitled to court

- appointed counsel, we ORDER the trial court to appoint an atto rney to represent appellant in the appeal. If the trial court finds that appellant is not entitled to court

- appointed counsel, the trial court shall determine whether appellant will retain counsel to represent him in the appeal and, if so, the name, State Bar number, and contact informatio n for retained counsel.We ORDER the trial court to transmit a reco rd of the hearing, including findings of fact,

any orders, and any supporting documentation, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. We DIRECT the Cl erk to s en d copies o f this order to the Honorable Tammy Kemp, Presiding Judge, 2 04th Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk ; and Kendra Thibodeaux, offici al court reporter , 2 04th Judicial District Court ; and Christina O ’ Neil, S enior S taff A t torne y Criminal District Court s . W e ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the order. The appeal will be reinstated t hirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Nellie Kearney, Appellant, v. New York City Railway Company, Respondent.

— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (08-012)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting; correction.

**Federal Register**                     Citation of Previous Announcement: 73 FR 4641, Notice Number 08-009, January 25, 2008.                 

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Aeronautics and Space Administration published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 25, 2008, announcing a meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP). The document did not announce the meeting date.                     

*Correction:*                         Date of ASAP meeting is Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Kathy Dakon, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Executive Director, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0732. 

Dated: January 28, 2008. 

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

 [FR Doc. E8-1912 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P