alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6254 

To amend the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 to 

modify the description of interest for purposes of certain distributions 

of antidumping duties and countervailing duties. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2021 

Mr. PANETTA (for himself and Mr. VALADAO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement 

Act of 2015 to modify the description of interest for 

purposes of certain distributions of antidumping duties 

and countervailing duties. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘China Trade Cheating 

5 Restitution Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6254 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DESCRIPTION OF INTEREST FOR 

2 PURPOSES OF CERTAIN DISTRIBUTIONS OF 

3 ANTIDUMPING DUTIES AND COUNTER4 VAILING DUTIES. 

5 Section 605(c)(1) of the Trade Facilitation and 

6 Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 4401(c)(1)) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2014’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘October 1, 2000’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6218 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.6218

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-two

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as the ``W.O.C. Kort Miller 
                       Plantenberg Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. W.O.C. KORT MILLER PLANTENBERG POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, shall be known and 
designated as the ``W.O.C. Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``W.O.C. 
Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 10.8

                         THE CHARLOTTE MARDEN 1993 TRUST
                           1290 South Ocean Boulevard
                            Palm Beach, Florida 33480

August 31, 2001



nStor Technologies, Inc.
10140 Mesa Rim Road
San Diego, CA  92121

Gentlemen:

The maturity date of the following  note due to The Charlotte  Marden 1993 Trust
from nStor Technologies, Inc. is hereby extended to December 31, 2001.

        Subordinated   Promissory  Note  for  $450,000,   dated  June  7,  2001,
        previously extended to August 31, 2001.

All other terms of the note remain the same.

                                                The Charlotte Marden 1993 Trust

                                                By: /s/ BA Marden
                                                   ________________
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gregory L. Paige, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Gregory L. Paige


Gregory L. Paige


Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 3, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amended Annual Report of Arotech Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Avihai Shen, Vice
President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                         By:           /s/ Avihai Shen
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Avihai Shen, Vice President - Finance and CFO
                             (Chief Financial Officer)

Date:  August 15, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00292-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE

GUARDIANSHIP OF ERMALYNN 

JONES A/K/A LYNNE NEASE 

JONES, AN ALLEGED 

INCAPACITATED PERSON

------------

FROM PROBATE COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2008-03262-2

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion to Dismiss.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: GARDNER, MEIER, and SUDDERTH, JJ. 

DELIVERED: September 24, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      31,383,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,165,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (565,933)
<INVENTORY>                                 22,131,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            84,756,049
<PP&E>                                     100,329,309
<DEPRECIATION>                            (55,917,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,448,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,122,956
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,595,232
<OTHER-SE>                                 100,617,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,448,961
<SALES>                                    123,618,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           125,549,529
<CGS>                                      102,191,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              102,191,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,006,024
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               741,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,610,786
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,893,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,717,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,717,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
**JMK** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0 543 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALAN PETER TWARDOSKI,

Defendan t and Appell an

t . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including June 22 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 14 2020

04/14/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0543
Exhibit 32.3



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







November 10, 2008



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
#### Rick LAMB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE-DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE (DFAS-DE/FTDC), Defendant — Appellee.

No. 01-35791.

D.C. No. CV-00-00126-LBE.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 8, 2002.*

Decided Nov. 14, 2002.

Before TROTT, T.G. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rick Lamb appeals the judgment entered by the district court dismissing his complaint with prejudice. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.

The conduct of the United States as alleged in the complaint, however far from commendable, constitutes a claim for defamation that is barred under 28 § U.S.C. 2860(h). *See, e.g., Hoesl v. United States,*629 F.2d 586, 587 (9th Cir.1980) (determining that a plaintiff could not assert a negligence action based on a negligently conducted psychiatric examination and negligently prepared report in light of the *872fact that plaintiffs “injury resulted from the *use*of the report by his supervisors” as opposed to negligent treatment based on an improper diagnosis) (emphasis added); *Talbert v. United States,*932 F.2d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1991) (determining that allegation of government’s failure to use reasonable care in maintaining accurate personnel records was defamatory action in light of fact that the injury flowed from past or future communication of the content of the files); *Moessmer v. United States,*760 F.2d 236, 237-38 (8th Cir.1985) (determining that the gravamen of the complaint was that the injury arose from the CIA communicating false information and not from its failure to maintain accurate information in a file).

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA MI MU MUS S A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74948 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 578- 538 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , M c K E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . H a m i m u M us s a , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of R w anda , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen. W e r evi ew f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n, and w e r e vi e w de novo q u e s tio n s o f

law , I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 889, 894 ( 9th C i r . 2003) . W e de ny th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . 

# FI LED MA R 02 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 74948 2 T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng M ussa ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erthree ye ar s a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nal d e c is io n , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1003. 2( c ) ( 2) , and M us s af a i l e d t o pr e s e nte vi de nc e of c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in R w an d ato q u a lif yf o ran e x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim it, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (3)( i i ); M a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 381 F . 3d 942, 945 ( 9th C i r . 2004) (“ T he cr i t i ca l qu es t i on i s . . . w hether c i rc um st ance s have c hang ed suff i ci ent l y that a p et i t i o n er w h o p rev i o u sl y d i dn o th av e a l eg i t i m at e cl ai m fo r asyl u m n o w h as a w e ll- f o u n d e df e aro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n .” ) . F u rth e r , th e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng M us s a ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n ba s e d on i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of co u n se l, b ec au se h e f

ailedto sh o w th at h e w as p re ju d iced b y h is fo rm erco u n se l’ s c o n du c t. Se e I

tu rr ib a rr ia , 321 F . 3d a t899- 90 ( pr e j udi c e r e s ul t s w he n the p e r f o rman c e o f

c o u n s e l “ w a s s o i n a d e q u a t e th a ti tmayh a v e a f f e c t e dth e o u t c o me o f th e p r o c e e d in g s ” ) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m ark s o m itte d ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Cory Turner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Clean Power Concepts Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:/s/ Cory TurnerName:Cory TurnerTitle:Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial OfficerDate:October 15, 2007
Exhibit 32.3



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Southern California Gas Company (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







August 2, 2007



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 

 
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTI, Jimmy S.H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to Section 906 of the*Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002*, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe *Securities Exchange Act of 1934*(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated:November 8, 2005           /s/ Jimmy S.H. Lee         Jimmy S.H. Lee    Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MercerInternational Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 641

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first amendment rights,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mrs. SCHROEDER (for herself, Mr. SHAYS, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr.

WAXMAN, and Mr. TORKILDSEN) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first

amendment rights, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Right To

5 Know Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

7 Title XI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is amended

8 by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘SEC. 1107. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision

10 of law, no governmental authority shall in or through any
2

•HR 641 IH

1 program or activity, administered or assisted by such au2 thority, that provides health care services or information,

3 limit the right of any person to provide, or the right of

4 any person to receive, nonfraudulent information about

5 the availability of reproductive health care services, includ6 ing family planning, prenatal care, adoption, and abortion

7 services.

8 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

9 ‘‘(1) the term ‘governmental authority’ means

10 any authority of any State or of the United States;

11 and

12 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ includes the District of

13 Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or

14 possession of the United States.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit
      99.2**





CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
          connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-KSB/A of
          Mortlock Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) for the period from September 19, 2006
          (date of inception) to June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
          Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael Laidlaw, Chief Executive Officer,
          President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
          adopted
          pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
          best of
          my knowledge and belief:


a.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and





b.
            The
                information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.





September
                  12, 2006
     MICHAEL LAIDLAW
     Michael
          Laidlaw


Chief
      Executive Officer,


President
      and
      Director





-1-
#### DAMBLY v. DUCONGE et al.

No. 2313.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Dec. 30, 1941.

W. Frank Gladney and Cecil N. Bank-ston, both of Baton Rouge, for appellants.

J. Oliver Bouanchaud, of Baton Rouge, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record shows that notice of judgment was served as required by law and the rules of this Court on November 22, 1941, and the application for a rehearing was deposited in the mail by registered letter at Baton Rouge on December 8th following.

Under Act 16 of 1910, judgments rendered by this court become final and exe-cutory on the fifteenth calendar day after rendition (after service of notice under the present Constitution). The plaintiff and appellee had fourteen days in which to file the application, not counting the day on which the notice was served nor the day on which the application was filed. Therefore, December 6th was the last day on which the application could be filed and that day was not a legal holiday. Of course, if December 7th, a legal holiday, had been the last day, the application could have been filed on the 8th. However, the last day on which the application could be filed was December 6th, and we are therefore unable to entertain the application and it cannot be considered. See Murray v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Co., La.App., 184 So. 413; McCollister v. Police Jury of Sabine Parish, La.App., 197 So. 661.

Application not entertained, having been filed too late.