alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 828

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of

documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1995

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886

5 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, and

6 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of

7 Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT

9 (United States official number 508299).

Æ
Exhibit 32.5



Statement of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Enterprises (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







May 5, 2009



/S/  Debra L. ReedDebra L. ReedChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                             180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      30785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 51446
<PP&E>                                           98529
<DEPRECIATION>                                   34252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  120481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            19100
<BONDS>                                          39746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                       49602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    120481
<SALES>                                         134744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                134744
<CGS>                                           113391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   113391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3012
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               1876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1876
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

MANDATE

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF COLLIN COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas, on the 30th day of July, 2014, the 

cause on appeal to revise or reverse the judgment between

DAVENPORT MEADOWS, LP, Appellant

No. 05-12-01471-CV V.

JACOB DOBRUSHKIN & GALINA 

DOBRUSHKIN, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 6, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-02710-2011.

Opinion delivered by Justice O'Neill. 

Justices Myers and Brown participating.

was determined; and this Court made its order in these words:

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellees JACOB DOBRUSHKIN & GALINA DOBRUSHKIN 

recover their costs of this appeal from appellant DAVENPORT MEADOWS, LP.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of the Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth District of Texas, in this behalf, and have it duly obeyed and executed.

WITNESS the HON. CAROLYN WRIGHT, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals, with 

the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Dallas, this 25th day of February, 2015.

LISA MATZ, Clerk
EXHIBIT 34.14

    Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for
     SunTrust Bank, Inc., as Vendor for SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., as Servicer



            Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
of SunTrust Bank, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We  have  examined   management's   assertion,   included  in  the  accompanying
Management's  Assertion on Compliance  with  Regulation  AB, that SunTrust Bank,
Inc.  complied  with the  servicing  criteria  set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's  Regulation AB for all residential mortgage
loan securitization  transactions occurring after December 31, 2005, serviced by
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (the Platform), as of December 31, 2006 and for the year
then ended for criteria 1122  (d)(2)(i),  1122 (d)(4)(i),  and 1122  (d)(4)(ii).
Management  is  responsible  for the  Company's  compliance  with the  servicing
criteria.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (placecountry-regionUnited  States) and, accordingly,
included  examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance
with the applicable  servicing  criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered  necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing  of  selected  servicing   activities  related  to  the  Platform,   and
determining  whether the  Company  processed  those  selected  transactions  and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable  servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities  performed by the Company  during the period  covered by this report.
Our  procedures  were not designed to detect  noncompliance  arising from errors
that may  have  occurred  prior  to or  subsequent  to our  tests  that may have
affected the balances or amounts  calculated  or reported by the Company  during
the period covered by this report.  We believe that our  examination  provides a
reasonable  basis for our  opinion.  Our  examination  does not  provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned  applicable  servicing  criteria  as of and  for the  year  ended
December 31, 2006 for all residential mortgage loan securitization  transactions
occurring after December 31, 2005, serviced by SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. is fairly
stated, in all material respects.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------

February 26, 2007
Charlotte, NC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                           4,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                       656
<INVENTORY>                                     13,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,746
<PP&E>                                          13,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,927)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,109
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,109
<SALES>                                         30,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,939
<CGS>                                           21,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (6)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    643
<INCOME-TAX>                                       238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                405
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.32




 Exhibit 10.32 

AMENDMENT NUMBER FIVE 

TO THE 
 HENRY SCHEIN,
INC. 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2011 

WHEREAS, Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Henry Schein, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as
of January 1, 2011 (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Plan, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Committee”) is authorized to amend the Plan; 
 WHEREAS,
The Committee wishes to amend the definition of “Disability” to explicitly reference that the determination will be made by the Social Security Administration or under the Company’s long-term disability plan; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of April 1, 2018: 

 

	1.	 Section 2.12 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 



“‘Disability’ means that a person has been determined to be disabled by the Social Security Administration or is
receiving income replacement benefits for full disability under the Company’s long-term disability plan for a period of not less than 3 months as set forth under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(C)(ii).” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 20 day of December, 2018. 

 

			
	HENRY SCHEIN, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ John Lee
	Title:	 	VP, Global Compensation & Benefits
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6201 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6201

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2022

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the authority for the establishment of a commemorative work 
  to honor enslaved and free Black persons who served in the American 
                  Revolution, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Liberty Memorial 
Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK.

    Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, 
the authority provided by section 2860 of the Military Construction 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (division B of Public Law 112-
239; 126 Stat. 2164; 40 U.S.C. 8903 note) shall continue to apply 
through September 30, 2027.

SEC. 3. DETERMINATION OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00 073

- CV

______________________________

OSCAR DEAN DAVIS , Appellant

V.

WALTER EARL STEPHENSON, SR. , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. CCL

- 11

- C

- 167

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Oscar Dean Davis , appellant, filed his notice of appeal July 20, 2011

.

Davis filed a motion to extend time “to complete appeal,” which this Court granted to

September 21 for the filing of the record. Davis is not indigent and is therefore responsible for

payment of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. app. C (B)(1); 20.1.

The clerk’s record was due on September 21, 2011. T here is no information to indicate

Davis has made efforts to have the clerk’s record filed with this Court. On October 21, 2011 , we

contacted Davis by letter, giving him an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning him

that if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to

dismissal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(b), (c).

On Sep tember 23, 2011, we received Davis’ brief in this matter, which we returned to him,

explaining that the clerk’s record had not been filed and that his brief would be due thirty days after

the clerk’s record had been filed. Appellate courts must base their decisions on the record as

made and brought forward, not on a record that should have been made or that could have been

made. Mar

. Overseas Corp. v. Ellis , 971 S.W.2d 402, 407 (Tex. 1998). Although t he

jurisdiction of a court of appeals is invoked by ti mely filing documents showing a bona fide intent

to appeal

, see Verburgt v. Dorner

, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616 (Tex. 1997), we cannot decide a case

without an adequate record, and with no clerk’s record, we have nothing to review, and therefore

we cannot find err or.3

We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: November 29, 2011

Date Decided: November 30, 2011
Exhibit 3.2

                             CERTIFICATE ELIMINATING
                               REFERENCE TO SERIES
                           OF SHARES OF STOCK FROM THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                            nSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                             a Delaware Corporation

     Pursuant  to the  provisions  of  Section  151(g) of the  Delaware  General
Corporation Law, it is hereby certified that:

     1. The name of the  corporation  is nStor  Technologies,  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation").

     2. The  designations of the series of shares of stock of the corporation to
which this certificate relates are as follows:

               (i) Series A Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (ii) Series C Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (iii) Series D Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (iv) Series E Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (v) Series F Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (vi) Series G Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (vii) Series H Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (viii) Series I Convertible Preferred Stock;

               (ix) Series K Convertible Preferred Stock.

     3. The designations,  powers, preferences,  and the rights of the shares of
each such series and the  qualifications,  limitations or  restrictions  thereof
were  provided  for in  resolutions  adopted  by the Board of  Directors  of the
Corporation  pursuant to authority  expressly  vested in it by the provisions of
the Restated  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation.  Certificates
setting forth said  resolutions have been heretofore filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware  pursuant to the  provisions of Section 151(g) of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     4. The Board of  Directors  of the  Corporation  has adopted the  following
resolution:

     RESOLVED, that none of the authorized shares of stock of the Corporation of
the series designated are outstanding; and

     FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that none of the said  series of the shares of stock of
the Corporation will be issued; and

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper officers of the Corporation be and hereby
are authorized and directed to file a certificate  setting forth this resolution
with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware  pursuant to the provisions
of Section  151(g) of the General  Corporation  Law of the State of Delaware for
the purpose of eliminating from the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation all reference to said series of shares of stock.

     5. The effective time of this certificate shall be upon filing.


Signed on the 8th day of October, 2002.


                                       nSTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                       /s/ Jack Jaiven
                                      ---------------------------
                                      Jack Jaiven, Vice President
#### TENNESSEE-ARKANSAS GRAVEL CO., Inc., v. HARVEY & JONES et al.

No. 4515.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 1, 1933.

H. W. Ayres, of Jonesboro, for appellants.-

W. J. Hammon, of Jonesboro, for appellee.

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

On application of plaintiff, and on its showing that we committed an error in our former judgment herein, this rehearing was granted. 147 So. 739. It was restricted solely to the question of attorney’s fees claimed by plaintiff. We held that these fees were not authorized by law, that is, that a road contractor could not be penalized by condemning him to pay the fees of the attorney of a suing creditor simply because he did not, or could not, pay his debts. In this we were in error. Such fees are authorized by section 8 of Act *134No. 224 of 1918, and were awarded *in State*v. Smith, 167 La. 301, 119 So. 56; State v. Miller, 169 La. 914, 126 So. 422.

The lower court allowed these fees. For the reasons assigned, our former decree herein is amended by affirming the judgment appealed from in the respect that it allowed plaintiff 10 per cent, attorney’s fees, and, as amended, our said decree is hereby reinstated and made the final judgment of this court.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6122 

To prohibit the payment of certain legal settlements to individuals who 

unlawfully entered the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 2, 2021 

Ms. MALLIOTAKIS (for herself, Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia, Mr. KELLY of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. JACOBS of New York, Mr. MEUSER, Mrs. 

HARSHBARGER, Mr. GIMENEZ, Mr. HERN, Ms. MACE, Mr. JOYCE of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. MOORE of Alabama, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. 

NORMAN, Mr. BERGMAN, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. CAWTHORN, Mr. 

OWENS, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. 

SIMPSON, and Mr. CLINE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the payment of certain legal settlements to 

individuals who unlawfully entered the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect American Tax5 payer Dollars from Illegal Immigration Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6122 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON LEGAL SETTLEMENTS FOR INDI2 VIDUALS WHO UNLAWFULLY ENTERED THE 

3 UNITED STATES. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed5 eral funds, including amounts deposited into the Judg6 ment Fund established under section 1304 of title 31, 

7 United States Code, may be expended for any legal settle8 ment to any individual who violated section 275(a) of the 

9 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1325(a)) if the 

10 claims giving rise to such settlement are based solely on 

11 the lawful detention of such individual as part of a family 

12 unit after entry at a port of entry or between ports of 

13 entry along the southern border of the United States after 

14 January 20, 2017. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,515,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,675,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                126,720,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      32,571,417
<DEPRECIATION>                              (9,957,166)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             171,976,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     86,089,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       462,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,589,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               171,976,696
<SALES>                                     19,784,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,423,044
<CGS>                                       17,801,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,214,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,365,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             187,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,344,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (649,580)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (9,694,916)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (9,694,916)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.10)
        

</TABLE>