alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Patterson Tool & Supply Co. *v.*Kemper. The Patterson Tool & Supply Co. *v.*Moorman. The Patterson Tool *&*Supply Co. *v.*Fritch.

(Nos. 23094, 23095 and 23096

Decided April 20, 1932.)

*Messrs. Osias & Osias, Mr. Harry N. Routsohn*and *Mr. W. S. Rhotehamel,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Kusworm & Shaman,*for defendants in error.

Without detailing the involved and unusual proceedings in the trial court wherein plaintiff in error sought to vacate judgments rendered against it therein, suffice it to say that the motions to vacate were fully presented to the trial court upon the statements of counsel and the evidence and were determined adversely to the plaintiff in error. Upon examination of the entire records we are unable to find that the trial court committed prejudicial error in overruling the motions to vacate. On consideration whereof it is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgments of the said Court of Appeals, affirming the trial court, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

*Judgments affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gregory L. Paige, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Gregory L. Paige





Gregory L. Paige


Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 1, 2012





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-11-00135-CV

______________________________

EAGLE LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

V.

DALE LYLES, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the Fifth Judicial District Court

Cass County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-C-310

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eagle Landing Homeowners Association, Inc., the sole appellant in this case, has filed a 

motion seeking to dismiss its appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure, his motion is granted. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

We dismiss the appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 25, 2012

Date Decided: January 26, 2012
#### Maynard N. Clement, as State Commissioner of Excise of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Federal Union Surety Company, Appellant (Apisdorf Certificate).

—Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Houghton, J., dissented.)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47151-47152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-52-001]


California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice of 
Filing

August 7, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 1, 2008, California Independent System 
Operator Corporation submitted for filing in compliance with the 
Commission's July 2, 2008 Order, a revised form of ``TAC Rate'' 
spreadsheet.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 47152]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1979483929ebfbdb8bfb482a4a1a1bea3a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e383b2c3d31101217101b2d0b0e0e110c0a3e181b0c1d50191108">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 22, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18729 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6563

LUTHER CARTER SPAIN, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versusCOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; VIRGINIA BEACH CIRCUIT COURT; ROBERT J. HUMPHREYS, Commonwealth Attorney Virginia Beach, Virginia, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-276-AM) Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luther Carter Spain, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s final order is dated stamped March 8, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 9, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Luther Carter Spain, Jr., appeals the district courts orders denying relief on his petition construed as filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999) and his motion to reconsider the judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Spain v. Virginia , No. CA-99-276-AM (E.D. Va. Mar . 9 & Mar. 29, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20118 Conference Calendar

__________________ WILLIAM ROBERT PARKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus HIGHLAND INSURANCE; LINDSEY MORGAN; COMMERCIAL RAILROAD SALVAGE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA H 95-4891
- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * William Robert Parker challenges the dismissal as frivolous of his civil rights complaint. Parker does not challenge the district court's imposition of sanctions. Therefore, this issue is deemed abandoned. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994). For essentially the same reason on which the district court relied, see Parker v. Highland Ins. , No. H-95-4891 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 1996), we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous.No. 96-20118 -2- This appeal is frivolous. See 5th Cir. 42.2. We caution Parker that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Parker is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED. ADMONITION ISSUED.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

               ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES INC.
             COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                   for the three months ended
                     March 31, 1997 and 1996
              (in thousands, except per share data)
                           (unaudited)
                           Exhibit 11

                                         Three Months         
                                    ----------------------        
                                      1997         1996    
                                    ---------     --------   
<S>                                 <C>           <C>      
PRIMARY INCOME 
  PER SHARE:
Net income                          $ 3,914       $ 4,478
                                    ========      ========
Weighted average number
  of shares outstanding              14,990        14,867  

Adjustment for stock
  options                               228           131  
                                    --------      --------
Adjusted weighted 
  average number of 
  shares outstanding                $15,218       $14,998 
                                    =======       ========

Primary income 
  per share                         $   .26       $   .30
                                    =======       ========

FULLY DILUTED INCOME
  PER SHARE:
Net income                          $ 3,914       $ 4,478 
                                    =======       ========

Weighted average number
  of shares outstanding              15,230        15,107 

Adjustment for stock 
  options                               229           144 
                                    --------      -------- 
Adjusted weighted average 
  number of shares 
  outstanding                       $15,459       $15,251 
                                    =======       ========

Fully diluted income
  per share                         $   .25       $   .29 
                                    =======       ========
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of CPG International Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn M. Fischer, the Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:    March  28, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/GLENN M. FISCHER             |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                               |   |   | Glenn M. Fischer                |
|                               |   |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 24, 2017

p1017

Order 

Clerk

October 24, 2017

155753

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 155753

COA: 335554

St. Joseph CC: 09-015638-FC

ANTHONY JOHN SPRINGER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

BERNSTEIN, J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### Teresa Castagna v. Robert P. Lawless.

Motion denied on terms stated in order.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6130 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6130

 To modify the boundary of the Wilson's Creek National Battlefield in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 2, 2021

   Mr. Long introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the boundary of the Wilson's Creek National Battlefield in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wilson's Creek National Battlefield 
Boundary Revision Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. WILSON'S CREEK NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    Section 1(b) Public Law 86-434 (16 U.S.C. 430kk(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in the second sentence, by striking ``The map'' 
                and inserting the following:
                    ``(C) Availability of maps.--The maps described in 
                subparagraphs (A) and (B)'';
                    (B) by striking ``(1) The boundaries'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) Additional land.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The boundaries'';
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (A) (as so 
                designated) the following:
                    ``(B) Newtonia battlefield addition.--The boundary 
                of the Wilson's Creek National Battlefield is revised 
                to include the approximately 624 acres of land 
                identified as `Proposed Addition' on the map entitled 
                `Wilson's Creek National Battlefield Proposed Boundary 
                Modification', numbered 410/177,379, and dated 
                September 2021.''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) Errors.--The Secretary of the Interior may 
                correct any clerical or typographical error in a map 
                described in subparagraph (A) or (B).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``(2) The Secretary is authorized 
                to acquire the lands referred to in paragraph (1)'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(2) Method of acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior 
        may acquire the land described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
        paragraph (1)''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``park'' 
                and inserting ``Wilson's Creek National Battlefield''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2010 

d0804 

Order 

 

August 6, 2010 

140164(36) 

HELIN YOUSIF, as Next Friend of 

RICHARD JOSEPH YOUSIF, a Minor, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140164 

 COA: 288302 

Macomb CC: 2007-002624-NI 

CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of defendant-appellant’s motion for reconsideration is 

considered, and the motion for reconsideration is DISMISSED with prejudice and 

without costs.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit _____________

No. 21-50769

consolidated with

No. 21-50778

Summary Calendar

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Francisco Javier Galvan-Silva, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CR-779-2

USDC No. 4:21-CR-248-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50769 Document: 00516227993 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
No. 21-50769

c/w No. 21-50778

2

Francisco Javier Galvan-Silva appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2) as well as the 

revocation of the term of supervised release he was serving at the time of the 

offense. He has not briefed, and has therefore abandoned, any challenge to 

the revocation of supervised release or his revocation sentence. See United 

States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251, 254-55 (5th Cir. 2010).

For the first time on appeal, Galvan-Silva contends that the 

enhancement of his sentence pursuant to § 1326(b) was unconstitutional

because the fact of a prior conviction was not charged and proved to a jury 

beyond a reasonable doubt. He has filed an unopposed motion for summary 

disposition and a letter brief explaining that he raises this issue only to 

preserve it for further review and conceding correctly that it is foreclosed by 

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States 

v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). Because summary disposition 

is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969), Galvan-Silva’s motion is GRANTED, and the district court’s 

judgments are AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50769 Document: 00516227993 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SAMUEL SWEET, DOC #H43694, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4557

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 1, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Donald D. Jacobson, Judge.

Samuel Sweet, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 21

KOPPERS INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

AMENDED
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                  |  |                                 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Entity Name                                       |  | State or Country of Organization
|Koppers Asia LLC                                  |  | Delaware                        
|Koppers Concrete Products, Inc.                   |  | Delaware                        
|Concrete Partners, Inc.                           |  | Delaware                        
|Koppers Delaware, Inc.                            |  | Delaware                        
|Koppers Redemption, Inc.                          |  | Delaware                        
|World-Wide Ventures                               |  | Delaware                        
|Koppers Assurance, Inc.                           |  | South Carolina                  
|Continental Carbon Australia Pty Ltd              |  | Australia                       
|Koppers Australia Holding Company Pty Ltd         |  | Australia                       
|Koppers Australia Pty. Limited                    |  | Australia                       
|Koppers Carbon Materials & Chemicals Pty Ltd      |  | Australia                       
|Koppers Wood Products Pty Ltd                     |  | Australia                       
|Koppers Shipping Pty. Ltd.                        |  | Australia                       
|Koppers (Beijing) Chemical Co., Ltd.              |  | Peoples Republic of China       
|Koppers (China) Carbon & Chemical Company Limited |  | Peoples Republic of China       
|Koppers Mauritius                                 |  | Republic of Mauritius           
|Koppers Europe ApS                                |  | Denmark                         
|Koppers Denmark A/S                               |  | Denmark                         
|Koppers Trading Denmark A/S                       |  | Denmark                         
|Koppers European Holdings A/S                     |  | Denmark                         
|Koppers Luxembourg S.ar.l                         |  | Grand Duchy Luxembourg          
|Koppers Poland Sp.zo.o.                           |  | Poland                          
|Koppers UK Holding Limited                        |  | United Kingdom                  
|Koppers UK Limited                                |  | United Kingdom                  
|Koppers UK Transport Limited                      |  | United Kingdom                  
|Koppers Lambson Limited                           |  | United Kingdom