alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, BALANCE SHEET, AND STATEMENT OF
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000811156
<NAME> CMS ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,883
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      5,395
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,406
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,083
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,767
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        2,619
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              (174)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   2,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              393
<PREFERRED>                                        244
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             2,042
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 139
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        5,216
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      265
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         99
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    35
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   2,888
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   13,767
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,538
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                37
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,293
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       1,330
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            208
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   1
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     209
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            98
<NET-INCOME>                                       111
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         13
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       98
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            38
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
<FN>
<F1>EPS FOR CMS ENERGY COMMON STOCK  $ .82
EPS FOR CLASS G COMMON STOCK      $1.19
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 724 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 724

         For the relief of Wade Bomar, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1995

 Mr. Williams introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         For the relief of Wade Bomar, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF OF WADE BOMAR.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $100,000 to Mr. Wade Bomar in full 
settlement of a claim for injuries sustained by Mr. Bomar in the line 
of duty on August 6, 1989, while fighting the Pryor Gap fire, 
permanently depriving him of the use of his limbs.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in closed session on September 25, 2008 from 0800 until 1830 and September 26, 2008 from 0800 until 1200 at the Pentagon. 

The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. The Board will hold classified discussions on national security matters. 

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552B (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to the public. 

Dated: August 15, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

 [FR Doc. E8-19496 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 25, 2011

d0418 

# Order

April 25, 2011

142355

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142355 COA: 292876 St. Joseph CC: 08-014948-FC STEPHNEE LYNN SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 18, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Edwin CRUZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNNAMED DEFENDANTS; M. Harrison, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; W. Fuller, Correctional Officer, Red Onion State Prison; J. Sykes, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-7135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 12, 2003.

Decided March 26, 2003.

Edwin Cruz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Edwin Cruz appeals the district court’s order entering judgment pursuant to the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Cruz v. Unnamed Defendants,*No. CA-01-95-7 (W-D.Va. June 21, 2002). We deny Cruz’s motion for transfer to another correctional facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
18583.

#### Jones *v.*Balkcom, Warden.

Wyatt, Presiding Justice.

Joe Lee Jones brought his petition for habeas corpus against R. P. Balkcom, Jr., Warden. The respondent filed a general demurrer to the petition. The trial court sustained the general demurrer, dismissed the petition, and remanded the custody of the petitioner to the respondent. The exception here is to that judgment. *Held:*

The sole contention of the plaintiff in error is that he was under 16 years of age at the time he was tried in Upson Superior Court for murder, and that the superior court was without jurisdiction to try him, for the reason that Ga. L. 1951, p. 291, conferred exclusive jurisdiction upon *the*juvenile court to try persons under the age of 17 years who might be charged with a violation of the law of this State. This court in *Jackson*v. *Balkcom,*ante, p. 412 (80 S. E. 2d 319) said: “Should any of the provisions of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 have been intended to withdraw the jurisdiction of the superior courts to try an offender, within the age of accountability under the law, for an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment, as contended by the petitioner; such provision would be unconstitutional and could be given no effect.” This ruling is adverse to the contentions of the plaintiff in error in this case. It is argued in this court that the petition for habeas corpus should not have been dismissed on demurrer for the reason that the Juvenile Court Act of 1951, supra, required the superior court judge to have made before trial certain investigations provided for in sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of the Juvenile Court Act. The answer to this contention is that these investigations are provided for trials in the juvenile courts. This case was tried in the superior court, and there is *690no authority for any such investigation in superior-court trials. It follows from what has been said above, the judgment complained of must be

Argued May 10, 1954

Decided May 31, 1954.

*A. T. Walden, E. S. D’Antignac,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. T. Grice, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, John J. ■ Flynt, Jr., Solicitor-General,*contra.

*Affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 22, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 22, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22A1088. MATTIE R. JAMES v. SWH 2017-1 BORROWER, LP, INVITATION HOMES.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

# Date and Time:

The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on August 14, 2008, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

## Open Session

### A. Approval of Minutes

    - July 10, 2008

### B. New Business

    - Fall 2008 Abstract of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions and the Fall 2008 Regulatory Performance Plan
    - Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Policy Statement

### C. Reports

    - Office of Management Services Quarterly Report

Dated: August 1, 2008.

Roland E. Smith,

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. E8-18122 Filed 8-4-08; 9:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 033-95702, 033-97542, 333-02828,
333-02892, 333-20245, 333-24493, 333-30328 and 333-40185 of Protection One, Inc. on Form S-8, and in Registration
Statement No. 333-50383 of Protection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. on Form S-3, of our report dated March 15, 2005,
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and to a subsequent event) relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Protection One, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Protection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm
Monitoring, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP             |  | 
|------------------------------------ |  | 
|Kansas City, Missouri
March 15, 2005 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF 1996
ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000075608
<NAME> PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                       4,528,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,399,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,770,000
<INVENTORY>                                 54,104,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           114,901,000
<PP&E>                                     120,645,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              66,597,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             227,459,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,453,000
<BONDS>                                     83,379,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 105,707,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               227,459,000
<SALES>                                    218,698,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           218,698,000
<CGS>                                      149,461,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,739,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,113,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               455,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,033,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,615,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (638,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (977,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (977,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                           1997 PERFORMANCE BONUS PLAN


All employees of the company are eligible to receive quarterly cash bonuses
based on quarterly results.  The components used to determine the ultimate
quarterly bonus payment are as follows:

IN FORCE PREMIUM         In force premium is the annualized total premiums in
                         effect at any one point in time.

LOSS RATIO               Claim costs divided by earned premium.

NET INCOME               Pre-tax, pre-bonus operating profit.

Targets were established for each of the identified components above based on
the 1997 business plan goals.  The amount of the bonus payment is determined
based on actual performance compared to the established Bonus Plan targets.
#### Wilbur Lee Dean v. State.

No. 25126.

January 31, 1951.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1951.

*Burks & McNeil,*by *Burton S. Burks,*Lubbock, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of fifty dollars.

Two highway patrolmen, while cruising, noticed appellant’s panel truck weaving on the highway. They had some difficulty in bringing appellant to a halt. They testified as to their experience in dealing with people under the influence of intoxicants, and that appellant was in such condition. They stated that appellant had a strong odor of alcohol about him, and one of them found a half full bottle of whiskey on the seat of his truck.

*544Appellant, while testifying, denied that he had had anything to drink on the occasion of his arrest and explained that the erratic appearance of his driving resulted from the roughness of the road.

Appellant in an able brief discussed his two bills of exception together. They both complain of that part of the information wherein it recites that the same is predicated “on the written affidavit of Frank Mitchell, a competent and creditable person.”

Appellant urges that such a statement is not essential for a valid information, amounts to a certification that the named affiant is worthy of belief and represents an effort on the part of the state to “bolster” its case.

A similar contention was held to be without merit by this court in Grady Ashley v. State, No. 25,085, decided January 3, 1951, (page 534 of this volume).

This being the only question presented, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The question presented in appellant’s motion for rehearing is identical with that first discussed in our opinion on rehearing in Ashley v. State, No. 25,085, (page 534 of this volume), wherein we overruled appellant’s contention. Further discussion would not be helpful.

The motion for rehearing is therefore overruled.

Opinion approved by the court.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 163 (Thursday, August 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49446-49447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19252]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency


Membership of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Senior Executive 
Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of membership--2008 DLA PRB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the 
Defense Logistics Agency Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance 
Review Board (PRB). The publication of PRB composition is required by 5 
U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior 
Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations to 
the Director, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), with respect to pay level 
adjustments and performance awards and other actions related to 
management of the SES cadre.

DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 
2533, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Julie Brown, SES Program Manager, 
Human Resources (J-1), Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense, 
(703) 767-5041.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of DLA career executives appointed 
to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, 
which begins on September 26, 2008.

[[Page 49447]]

PRB Chair: Major General Arthur Morrill III, USAF.
Members: Mr. Jeffrey Neal, Director, Human Resources. Mr. Larry Glasco, 
Deputy Director, Logistics Operations & Readiness. Mr. James 
McClaugherty, Deputy Commander, Defense Supply Center Columbus.

Robert T. Dail,
USA, Director, Defense Logistics Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-19252 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3620-01-M