49446 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Notices 

recordkeeping costs related to electronic 

credit card payments and electronic 

deposit account replenishments. 

There are service fees for setting up a 

deposit account at the USPTO, for not 

maintaining the minimum balance 

required for the deposit account, and for 

returned payments. The service charge 

to establish a deposit account is $10, 

and the USPTO estimates that it 

processes 298 Deposit Account 

Application Forms annually, for a total 

of $2,980 per year. There is also a $25 

service charge for deposit accounts that 

are below the minimum balance ($1,000 

minimum balance for an unrestricted 

deposit account or $300 minimum 

balance for a restricted deposit account) 

at the end of the month. The USPTO 

estimates that it assesses 4,000 of these 

low balance charges annually, for a total 

of $100,000 per year. There is a $50 

service charge for processing a payment 

refused (including a check returned 

‘‘unpaid’’) or charged back by a 

financial institution. The USPTO 

estimates that it assesses 456 of these 

returned payment charges annually, for 

a total of $22,800 per year. The total 

estimated service fees for this collection 

are $125,780 per year. 

Customers may incur postage costs 

when submitting the Credit Card 

Payment Form and other paper forms or 

requests to the USPTO by mail. 

Customers generally send the Credit 

Card Payment Form to the USPTO along 

with other documents related to the fee 

or service being paid for by credit card, 

but some customers may submit just the 

Credit Card Payment Form without 

additional supporting documents. The 

USPTO estimates that roughly 5 percent 

of the 863,389 paper Credit Card 

Payment Forms submitted annually may 

be mailed in by themselves, 

approximately 43,169 per year. The 

USPTO estimates that it will receive an 

additional 27,480 submissions per year 

that may be mailed, including Deposit 

Account Application Forms, Deposit 

Account Replenishments, Deposit 

Account Closure Requests, and Refund 

Requests, for a total of 70,649 mailed 

submissions per year. The USPTO 

estimates that the first-class postage cost 

for a mailed submission will be 42 

cents, for a total postage cost of 

approximately $29,673 per year. 

Customers using the Electronic Credit 

Card Payment Form or the Electronic 

Deposit Account Replenishment Form 

may incur recordkeeping costs from 

printing a copy of the electronic receipt 

confirming their successful online 

transaction. The USPTO estimates that 

it will take 5 seconds (0.001 hours) to 

print a copy of the confirmation receipt 

and that approximately 1,034,986 

submissions per year will use the 

Electronic Credit Card Payment Form or 

the Electronic Deposit Account 

Replenishment Form, for a total 

recordkeeping burden of 1,035 hours 

per year. Using the paraprofessional rate 

of $90 per hour, the USPTO estimates 

that the recordkeeping cost associated 

with this collection will be 

approximately $93,150 per year. 

The total non-hour respondent cost 

burden for this collection in the form of 

service fees, postage costs, and 

recordkeeping costs is estimated to be 

$248,603 per year. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, e.g., the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: August 14, 2008. 

Susan K. Fawcett, 

Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, Customer Information 

Services Group, Public Information Services 

Division. 

[FR Doc. E8–19375 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[CPSC Docket No. 08–C0018] 

Cobmex, Inc., Provisional Acceptance 

of a Settlement Agreement and Order 

Correction 

In notice document Z8–18395 

beginning on page 46877 in the issue of 

Tuesday, August 12, 2008, make the 

following correction: 

On page 46877, in the third column, 

under the DATES heading, in the fifth 

line, ‘‘(insert date that is 15 calendar 

days from publication date)’’ should 

read ‘‘August 27, 2008’’. 

[FR Doc. Z8–18395 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

[CPSC Docket No. 08–C0017] 

Siegfried & Parzifal, Inc., Provisional 

Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement 

and Order 

Correction 

In notice document Z8–18399 

beginning on page 46885 in the issue of 

Tuesday, August 12, 2008, make the 

following correction: 

On page 46885, in the first column, 

under the DATES heading, in the fifth 

line, ‘‘(insert date that is 15 calendar 

days from publication date)’’ should 

read ‘‘August 27, 2008’’. 

[FR Doc. Z8–18399 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Defense Logistics Agency 

Membership of the Defense Logistics 

Agency (DLA) Senior Executive 

Service (SES) Performance Review 

Board (PRB) 

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, 

Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice of membership—2008 

DLA PRB. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

appointment of members to the Defense 

Logistics Agency Senior Executive 

Service (SES) Performance Review 

Board (PRB). The publication of PRB 

composition is required by 5 U.S.C. 

4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and 

impartial review of Senior Executive 

Service performance appraisals and 

makes recommendations to the Director, 

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), with 

respect to pay level adjustments and 

performance awards and other actions 

related to management of the SES cadre. 

DATES: Effective Date: September 26, 

2008. 

ADDRESSES: Defense Logistics Agency, 

8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, 

Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060–6221. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Julie Brown, SES Program Manager, 

Human Resources (J–1), Defense 

Logistics Agency, Department of 

Defense, (703) 767–5041. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 

following are the names and titles of 

DLA career executives appointed to 

serve as members of the SES PRB. 

Members will serve a 12-month term, 

which begins on September 26, 2008. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 163 / Thursday, August 21, 2008 / Notices 49447 

PRB Chair: Major General Arthur 

Morrill III, USAF. 

Members: Mr. Jeffrey Neal, Director, 

Human Resources. Mr. Larry Glasco, 

Deputy Director, Logistics Operations 

& Readiness. Mr. James McClaugherty, 

Deputy Commander, Defense Supply 

Center Columbus. 

Robert T. Dail, 

USA, Director, Defense Logistics Agency. 

[FR Doc. E8–19252 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3620–01–M 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The IC Clearance Official, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of Management invites 

comments on the submission for OMB 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before 

September 22, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Education Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street, NW., Room 10222, 

Washington, DC 20503. Commenters are 

encouraged to submit responses 

electronically by email to 

oiralsubmission@omb.eop.gov or via 

fax to (202) 395–6974. Commenters 

should include the following subject 

line in their response ‘‘Comment: [insert 

OMB number], [insert abbreviated 

collection name, e.g., ‘‘Upward Bound 

Evaluation’’]. Persons submitting 

comments electronically should not 

submit paper copies. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The IC Clearance 

Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of 

Management, publishes that notice 

containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or 

reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of 

the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

Dated: August 18, 2008. 

Angela C. Arrington, 

IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of Management. 

Institute of Education Sciences 

Type of Review: New. 

Title: National Study on Alternate 

Assessments Teacher Survey. 

Frequency: Annually. 

Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal 

Gov’t, SEAs or LEAs. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 600. 

Burden Hours: 1,335. 

Abstract: The National Study on 

Alternate Assessments (NSAA) Teacher 

Survey will examine the use of alternate 

assessments based on alternate 

achievement standards by surveying a 

sample of teachers who use these 

assessments with students who have 

significant cognitive disabilities. The 

survey will study motivation and 

expectations, professional capacity and 

support, instructional resources, and 

opportunity to learn academic content. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection submission for OMB review 

may be accessed from http:// 

edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the 

‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and 

by clicking on link number 3695. When 

you access the information collection, 

click on ‘‘Download Attachments’’ to 

view. Written requests for information 

should be addressed to U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., LBJ, Washington, DC 20202–4537. 

Requests may also be electronically 

mailed to ICDocketMgr@ed.gov or faxed 

to 202–401–0920. Please specify the 

complete title of the information 

collection when making your request. 

Comments regarding burden and/or 

the collection activity requirements 

should be electronically mailed to 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Individuals who 

use a telecommunications device for the 

deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–

800–877–8339. 

[FR Doc. E8–19430 Filed 8–20–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

[Docket No. PP–304] 

Record of Decision and Floodplain 

Statement of Findings; Generadora del 

Desierto SA de C.V. (GDD) San Luis 

Rio Colorado (SLRC) Project 

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery 

and Energy Reliability (OE), Department 

of Energy (DOE). 

ACTION: Record of Decision (ROD) and 

Floodplain Statement of Findings. 

SUMMARY: DOE announces its decision 

to issue a Presidential Permit that would 

authorize Generadora del Desierto SA 

de C.V. (GDD) to construct, operate, 

maintain, and connect a new doublecircuit 230,000-volt (230-kV) electric 

transmission line across the U.S.- 

Mexico border into Yuma County, 

southeast of San Luis, Arizona. The 

environmental impacts that would be 

associated with the line were analyzed 

in the Environmental Impact Statement 

(EIS) for the San Luis Rio Colorado 

Project (DOE/EIS–0395, SLRC EIS). The 

transmission line, known as the San 

Luis Rio Colorado (SLRC) Project, 

would extend from a new gas-fired 

electric power plant, known as the 

SLRC Power Center (to be constructed 

by GDD approximately one mile south 

of the U.S.-Mexico border in San Luis 

Rio Colorado, Sonora, Mexico), cross the 

U.S.-Mexico border, extend 

approximately 21 miles north, and 

connect to the existing Gila Substation 

that is owned and operated by the 

Western Area Power Administration 

(Western), an organizational element 

within DOE. From the Gila Substation, 

the line would extend an additional five 

miles north and connect to the existing 

North Gila Substation that is owned and 

operated by the Arizona Public Service 

Company (APS). 

In reaching this decision, DOE 

considered the low environmental 

impacts in the United States from 

constructing, operating, maintaining, 

and connecting the proposed 

international transmission line and from 

the construction and operation of the 

SLRC Power Center, the absence of 

adverse impacts to the reliability of the 

U.S. electric power supply system, and 

the absence of major issues of concern 

to the public. On October 12, 2007, 

Western issued a ROD (72 FR 58074) in 

which it decided to allow the proposed 

international transmission line and the 

SLRC Power Center to interconnect with 

Western’s transmission system at the 

Gila Substation. 

DOE has prepared this ROD and 

Floodplain Statement of Findings in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES