alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                  STATE OF ORGANIZATION
------------------                                  ---------------------
Summit Properties Partnership, L.P.                       Delaware
Summit Financing, Inc.                                    Maryland
Summit Southwest I, Inc.                                  Maryland
Summit Southwest GP, Inc.                                 Maryland
Nagrom Enterprises, Inc.                                Pennsylvania
Summit Management Company                                 Maryland
Summit Apartment Builders, Inc.                            Florida
Home Ownership Made Easy, LLC                             Delaware
Stony Point/Summit, LLC                                North Carolina
Summit/Belmont, LLC                                    North Carolina
Henderson/McGuire, LLC                                 North Carolina
McGregor/McGuire, LLC                                  North Carolina
Portofino Place, Ltd.                                      Florida
Foxcroft East Associates                               North Carolina
Summit Southwest, L.P.                                    Delaware
Summit Valley Brook, LLC                                  Delaware
Summit Shiloh, LLC                                         Georgia
Summit Sweetwater, LLC                                     Georgia
Summit Grandview, LLC                                  North Carolina
Summit Grand Parc, LLC                                    Delaware
Summit Roosevelt, LLC                                     Delaware
PAPEC Silo Creek, LLC                                     Delaware
Summit Brickellview, LLC                                  Delaware
EXHIBIT 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF EQUITY INNS, INC.


                                                       Jurisdiction of
Name                                              Incorporation/Organization
----                                              --------------------------

Equity Inns Trust                                        Maryland
Equity Inns Services, Inc.                               Tennessee
Equity Inns TRS Holdings, Inc.                           Tennessee
Equity Inns Partnership, L.P.                            Tennessee
Equity Inns Partnership II, L.P.                         Tennessee
Equity Inns/West Virginia Partnership, L.P.              Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation                                Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership I, L.P.                        Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation II                             Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership II, L.P.                       Tennessee
EQI/WV Financing Partnership, L.P.                       Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation III                            Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership III, L.P.                      Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation IV                             Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership IV, L.P.                       Tennessee
EQI Financing Corporation V                              Tennessee
EQI Financing Partnership V, L.P.                        Tennessee
EQI/WV Financing Corporation                             Tennessee
EQI/WV Financing Partnership II, L.P.                    Tennessee
E. Inns Orlando, Inc.                                    Tennessee
E.I.P. Orlando, L.P.                                     Tennessee
ENN Company, Inc.                                        Tennessee
ENN Leasing Company, Inc.                                Tennessee
ENN Leasing Company I, L.L.C.                            Delaware
ENN Leasing Company II, L.L.C.                           Delaware
ENN Leasing Company III, L.L.C.                          Delaware
ENN Leasing Company IV, L.L.C.                           Delaware
ENN Leasing Company V, L.L.C.                            Delaware
ENN KS, Inc.                                             Kansas
ENN TRS, Inc.                                            Tennessee
ENN TN, LLC                                              Tennessee
ENN TN I, LLC                                            Delaware
ENN TN II, LLC                                           Delaware
ENN TN IV, LLC                                           Delaware
ENN TN V, LLC                                            Delaware
EQI FL Corporation                                       Tennessee
**Exhibit
      23.2**




**CONSENT OF
        INDEPENDENT
        REGISTERED
        PUBLIC
        ACCOUNTINGFIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-74197, 333-86728 and 333-124960) (pertaining to the 1995 Amended
      and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Non-Executive
      Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan and the 2004 Stock
      Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-95361,
      333-33986, 333-37630, 333-45818, 333-49628, 333-59346, 333-63514, 333-99559,
      333-99673, 333-106420, 333-110729, 333-112611, 333-124959, 333-124961,
      333-128497 and 333-129713) of our reports dated January 31, 2006 with respect
      to
      the financial statements of Armour of America, Inc. and March 10, 2006 with
      respect to the financial statements of IES Interactive Training, Inc. for the
      year ended December 31, 2005 referred to in Arotech Corporation’s Annual Report
      on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005.




/s/
                Stark Winter
                Schenkein & Co., LLPSTARK
                WINTERSCHENKEIN&
                CO.,
                LLP




Denver,
      Colorado


July
      24,
      2006
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6196 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6196

   To require the Secretary of Defense to reduce the fluctuations of 
  supply and demand for certain covered items, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2021

 Ms. Slotkin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Defense to reduce the fluctuations of 
  supply and demand for certain covered items, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supply Chain Fluctuation Forecasting 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF FLUCTUATIONS OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND FOR CERTAIN 
              COVERED ITEMS.

    (a) Supply and Demand Requirements.--Not later than one year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall--
            (1) specify methods and processes to track and reduce 
        fluctuations in supply chain forecasting and demand 
        requirements of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, each 
        military department (as defined in section 101 of title 10, 
        United States Code), and the Defense Logistics Agency for 
        covered items; and
            (2) implement policies to encourage predictable demand 
        requirements for covered items for the Office of the Secretary 
        of Defense, each military department, and the Defense Logistics 
        Agency.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 15 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, each Secretary of a 
military department and the Director of the Defense Logistics Agency 
shall submit to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Sustainment a report on the fluctuations in supply chain forecasting 
and demand requirements for each covered item, expressed as a 
percentage.
    (c) Covered Item Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
item'' means a covered item described in subparagraph (B), (C), or (E) 
of subsection (b)(1) or subsection (b)(2) of section 2533a of title 10, 
United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Document













               Exhibit 10.14
11 September 2017
Mr. Torsten Hoof 
Luegetenstrasse 26 
6313 Menzingen (Zug)
Re: Amendment to Employment Agreement commencing 1 September 2017
Dear Torsten:
As a correction to your Employment Agreement, we confirm that you will receive a monthly car benefit payment of 1'650 CHF, subject to statutory deductions, along with your monthly salary.
The Geneva Fiscal Administration's interpretation of Geneva tax law unfortunately prevents the Company from paying kilometrage on your personal car when you use it for business purposes if you benefit from a car allowance, but there is otherwise no effect on the Company's reimbursement of your expenses.
This benefit will be considered incorporated into your Employment Agreement unless you object.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jennifer May
Jennifer May
Senior Director, Human Resources
By express power of attorney
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.9d(1)

[LOGO] Plaza Realty &
       Management Services, inc.

       THE HAMMONS TOWER
       901 St Louis Street, Suite 106
       Springfield, Missouri 65806
       (417) 864-4544
       Fax (417) 864-4596


December 18, 2001


Mr. John Q. Hammons
John Q. Hammons Hotels, Inc.
300 John Q. Hammons Parkway, Suite #900
Springfield, MO 65806

RE: LEASE RENEWAL - SUITE 800, JOHN Q. HAMMONS BUILDING

Dear Mr. Hammons

Please allow this letter to serve as the Lessor's proposal to extend your Lease
Agreement relating to your Leased Premises within the John Q. Hammons Building,
Springfield, Missouri.

As of January 1, 2002, the Lessor will extend your Lease for an additional
three(3) year period under the same terms and conditions as outlined in your
Lease dated December 16, 1998 with exception to base rental which shall be
increased to $7,500.00 per month. We will also adjust your base year as it
relates to increased building costs to the actual cost for 2002.

Should this meet with your approval, please sign all three (3) copies of this
letter and return them to my attention. Upon receiving the Lessor's approval and
signature, I will return one (1) fully executed copy for your files.

Sincerely,

PLAZA REALTY & MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC

/s/ Mark Harrell

Mark Harrell
President

MH/kb

LESSOR:
ACCEPTED BY: /s/ John Q. Hammons     DATE: 12-20-01
             -----------------------      ------------
             Mr. John Q. Hammons

LESSEE:
ACCEPTED BY: /s/ John Q. Hammons     DATE: 12-20-01
             -----------------------      -----------
             Mr. John Q. Hammons
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Febr uar y 15, 2008 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 13630 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D ocketN o. 06 -000 12 -C R -001 -H L -7 U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s L E W I S A N T O N I O A RN O L D , a .k .a . L .A ., D e f e n d an t- A p p e llan t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e M id d le D is tr ic t o f G e o r g ia

_________________________ ( F e b r u ar y 15, 2008) B efo re B L A C K , C A RN E S an dB A R K E T T , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E RC U R I A M: G e r a ldB . W illia m s , ap p o in te dc o u n s e l f o rL e w is A n to n io A rn o ldo n th is2

d i rectcri m i n al ap p eal , h as fi l eda m o t i o n t o w i th d raw o n ap p eal sup p o rt edb y a br i e f pr e par e d pur s uantt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L .E .2 d4 9 3 (1 9 6 7 ). O u r in d ep en d en t rev iew o f th e r ec o rd re v ea ls th at co u n se l’ s a s s e s s m e n to f

th e r e l a t i v e m e r i to f

th e ap p e a l i s c o rr e c t . We n o t e th a t , b e c au s e we que s t i on the appl i c abi l i tyof A rnol d’ s s e nt e nc e appe a l w a i ve r , w e do notr e l yon th a t w a iv e rin d e te rm in in g th a t th e r e ar e n o is s u e s o f ar g u ab le m e r it f

o rap p e a l. B e c aus e i nde pe nde nte xa m i na t i on of the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s no ar guabl e i s s ue s of m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , and A rnol d’ s c onvi c t i on and se nt ence ar e A FFI R M ED .
Since the Government has already located these videotapes, it admits that obtaining 1

them will not cause any unfair disruption or burden on its day-to-day activities. The Government’s

(continued...)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED AL ADAHI, :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-280 (GK)

:

BARACK OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

ORDER

Petitioner Al Adahi has moved to compel Respondent to produce videotapes of three forced

extractions of Petitioner from his cell at Guantanamo Bay. Since the filing of this Motion on June

8, 2009, the Government has informed Petitioner of the existence of videotapes of three additional

extractions. Respondents seek to use a number of statements made by Petitioner against him at his

habeas corpus hearing to be held on Monday, June 22, 2009. No counsel, either for the Petitioner

or the Government, has seen the videotapes. Consequently, it is impossible for any counsel to make

representations as to whether they are or are not exculpatory. Petitioner argues that there are reasons

to believe that the actions of the Forced Cell Extraction Teams (“FCE Teams”) have in the past been

abusive, violent, and inhumane. See Exh. A to Petitioner’s Motion. In this case, one of the forced

extractions occurred approximately 15 days after Petitioner Al Adahi gave a very inculpatory

statement to Government interrogators. Consequently, the videotapes may be exculpatory, in which

case they would fall squarely within paragraph I.D.1 of the Case Management Order. Therefore, the

videotapes must be produced so that this determination can be made.1
(...continued) 1

concern that an order to compel production of the videotapes in this case might “open the door” to

other detainees to request such evidence, is unpersuasive. Each merits judge will make his or her

own determination on the basis of the specific facts presented if such a motion is made.

Since this is a six-day bench trial, the tapes may be played at a later point in the trial, 2

after the conclusion of Petitioner’s case, if they are deemed exculpatory.

-2-

WHEREFORE, it is this 18th day of June, 2009, hereby

ORDERED, that Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Production of IRF Videotapes is granted,

and the videotapes discussed must be produced by Friday, June 19, 2009, unless counsel are able to

agree to a different schedule.2

/s/ 

Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies via ECF to all counsel of record
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

      I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


             1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
                Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
                covered by this report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust
                2006-OA2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

             2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
                taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
                make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
                which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
                to the period covered by this report;

             3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
                other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for
                the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
                Act periodic reports;

             4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
                servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance
                review(s) conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
                statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of
                Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
                periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
                obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
                respects; and

             5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
                criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
                attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
                criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
                in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
                and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as
                an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
                this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described
                in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
                10-K.

             In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
             information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
             The Bank of New York, as Trustee.

         Date: March 27, 2007


             /s/ Steve Bailey
             -----------------------
             Steve Bailey
             Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 794

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem certain municipal

treatment facilities as the equivalent of secondary treatment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1995

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mr. PACKARD, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. HUNTER,

and Mr. FILNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem

certain municipal treatment facilities as the equivalent

of secondary treatment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MUNICIPAL TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE

4 DEEMED THE EQUIVALENT OF SECONDARY

5 TREATMENT.

6 Section 304(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Con7 trol Act (33 U.S.C. 1314(d)) is amended by inserting after

8 paragraph (4) the following:
2

•HR 794 IH

1 ‘‘(5) For purposes of this subsection, any municipal

2 treatment facility employing chemically enhanced primary

3 treatment that discharges via an ocean outfall into an

4 open marine environment over 4.0 miles off-shore into a

5 depth exceeding 300 feet and is in compliance with all

6 local and State receiving body water quality standards

7 shall be deemed the equivalent of secondary treatment.’’.

Æ
Order filed August 6, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00213-CV

____________

SHIRLEY A. MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

KEVIN DALE GENTRY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-52902

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 15, 2019. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 14, 2019

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I,
Bradley R. Grining, the Acting Principal Financial Officer of Kimball Hill, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that based on my knowledge the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information
contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/BRADLEY R. GRININGBradley R. Grining Acting Principal Financial
Officer*
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
January 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 16-1026V Filed: January 26, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * JOHN R. BELT, *
* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. * Influenza (“ Flu”); Shoulder Injury
* Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
* Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bruce Slane, Law Office of Bruc e W. Slane, P.C ., for petitioner. Claudia Gangi, U.S. Department of Just ice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On August 18, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) following an October 30, 2015 influenza (“flu”) vaccination in
his left shoulder. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 26, 2017, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compen sation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent determined the alleged injury is consistent with a SIRVA. Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Cour t of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master