alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000076063
<NAME>                                       Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    41800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      52800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                138300
<PP&E>                                         2716100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1777200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1808300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           771100
<BONDS>                                         299200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                      564300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1808300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                401300
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   180700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 64500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               55200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 167500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     42700     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              69600     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0     
<NET-INCOME>                                     69600     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0 <F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>
                                               


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-QSB
for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                          Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                            Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                                        8,232
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                17,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                               2,648,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          2,719,170
<PP&E>                                                    1,444,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                              905,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            3,258,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     4,462,785
<BONDS>                                                     979,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                  1,327,927
<OTHER-SE>                                              (3,511,434)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              3,258,728
<SALES>                                                   3,835,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          3,906,066
<CGS>                                                     3,218,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             4,205,975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           91,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (299,909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (299,909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (299,909)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.13)



</TABLE>
EX-4.6(c)





 Exhibit 4.6(c) 

Schedule of Omitted Supplements to Security Agreement 

The supplements to the security agreement referenced below are substantially identical in all material respects to the Supplement No. 2 dated as of
October 27, 2011 to the Security Agreement dated as of November 17, 2006, amended and restated as of March 2, 2009, as supplemented (the “Security Agreement”) and filed as Exhibit 4.6(b) to the Company’s annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Annual Report”), except as to the names of the additional subsidiary grantors listed on the signature pages thereto and the dates
on which such supplements to the Security Agreement were entered into. These supplements to the Security Agreement are not being filed as exhibits to the Annual Report in reliance on Instruction 2 to Item 601 of Regulation S-K. 
 Supplements to the Security Agreement entered into among HCA Inc., Bank of America, N.A., as collateral agent, and
the following subsidiaries as additional subsidiary grantors, as of the dates indicated: 
  

					
	 Supplement Number
	  	 Date
	  	 Additional Subsidiary
Grantors

			
	No. 3	  	November 4, 2011	  	Spalding Rehabilitation L.L.C.
			
	No. 4	  	January 27, 2012	  	 •  HealthTrust Workforce Solutions, LLC

 
 •  Parallon Business Solutions,
LLC
  
 •  Parallon Enterprises,
LLC
  
 •  Parallon Health
Information Solutions, LLC
  

•  Parallon Payroll Solutions, LLC

 
 •  Parallon Physician Services,
LLC
  
 •  PTS Solutions,
LLC

			
	No. 5	  	December 7, 2012	  	HCA American Finance LLC
			
	No. 7	  	December 6, 2013	  	Poinciana Medical Center, Inc.
			
	No. 8	  	December 6, 2013	  	U.S. Collections, Inc.
			
	No. 9	  	December 6, 2013	  	West Florida – MHT, LLC
			
	No. 10	  	December 6, 2013	  	West Florida – PPH, LLC
			
	No. 12	  	December 6, 2013	  	North Texas – MCA, LLC
			
	No. 13	  	January 9, 2015	  	 •  Citrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.

 
 •  Citrus Memorial Property
Management, Inc.
  
 •  CHCA
Pearland, L.P
  
 •  Columbia
Healthcare System of Louisiana, Inc.
  

•  HCA Pearland GP, Inc.
  

•  Mountain Division – CVH, LLC

 
 •  Pearland Partner, LLC

 
 •  Primary Health, Inc.

 
 •  Sarah Cannon Research
Institute, LLC
  
 •  SCRI
Holdings, LLC
  
 •  Southpoint,
LLC
  
 •  Vision Consulting
Group LLC
  
 •  Vision
Holdings, LLC
  
 •  WCP
Properties, LLC















					
	No. 14	  	November 9, 2015	  	 •  PatientKeeper, Inc.

 
 •  Putnam Community Medical
Center of North Florida, LLC

	No. 15	  	January 10, 2017	  	 •  East Florida – DMC, Inc.

 
 •  H2U Wellness Centers, LLC

 
 •  JPM AA Housing, LLC

 
 •  MediCredit, Inc.

 
 •  Oklahoma Holding Company,
LLC
  
 •  Outpatient Services
Holdings, Inc.
  
 •  Oviedo
Medical Center, LLC
  
 •  SSHR
Holdco, LLC
  
 •  Parallon
Revenue Cycle Services, Inc.

	No. 16	  	January 3, 2018	  	 •  Cy-Fair Medical Center Hospital, LLC

 
 •  Houston NW Manager, LLC

 
 •  Houston – PPH, LLC

 
 •  North Houston – TRMC,
LLC
  
 •  Savannah Health
Services, LLC
  
 •  Sebring
Health Services, LLC
  

•  Southeast Georgia Health Services, LLC

 
 •  Weatherford Health Services,
LLC



  
 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT (15)(b)





July 31, 2001


Consumers Energy Company:

We are aware that Consumers Energy Company has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements No. 333-62501 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2001, which includes our report dated July 31, 2001 covering the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 794 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 794

   To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem certain 
     municipal treatment facilities as the equivalent of secondary 
                               treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1995

Mr. Bilbray (for himself, Mr. Packard, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Hunter, and 
 Mr. Filner) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to deem certain 
     municipal treatment facilities as the equivalent of secondary 
                               treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MUNICIPAL TREATMENT FACILITIES TO BE DEEMED THE EQUIVALENT 
              OF SECONDARY TREATMENT.

    Section 304(d) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1314(d)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (4) the 
following:
    ``(5) For purposes of this subsection, any municipal treatment 
facility employing chemically enhanced primary treatment that 
discharges via an ocean outfall into an open marine environment over 
4.0 miles off-shore into a depth exceeding 300 feet and is in 
compliance with all local and State receiving body water quality 
standards shall be deemed the equivalent of secondary treatment.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Notice of Meeting

    Agency Holding the Meeting: Tennessee Valley Authority (Meeting No. 
08-04).
    Time and Date: 10 a.m. EDT, August 20, 2008, TVA West Tower 
Auditorium, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee.

Agenda

Old Business

    Approval of minutes of May 19, 2008, Board meeting.

New Business

    1. Chairman's Report.
    A. Committee Assignments.
    2. President's Report.
    3. Report of the Finance, Strategy, Rates, and Administration 
Committee.
    A. Fiscal Year 2009 budget.
    B. Rate Review and possible adjustment.
    C. Fiscal Year 2009 Bond Issuance Authorization.
    D. Pricing issues.
    i. LIP/LFP annual product reviews.
    ii. Seasonal Pricing TOU/Market Days Pilots for FY09.
    iii. Price quote for directly served customer.
    E. TVA contribution to the TVA Retirement System.
    4. Report of the Operations, Environment, and Safety Committee.
    A. Settlement of claims with Bechtel and Stone & Webster 
Construction, Inc.
    B. Contracts related to nuclear fuel.
    i. Contracts with Demson Mines and Cameco for uranium.
    ii. Contract with ARE VA NP for Blended Low Enriched Uranium 
processing services.
    iii. Contract with Westinghouse for WBN Unit 2 fuel fabrication 
services.
    C. Contract with General Electric for equipment, parts, and 
services.
    D. Contract with ANR for gas transportation.
    E. Revised Transmission Service Guidelines.
    5. Report of the Audit, Governance, and Ethics Committee.
    A. Committee Charters.
    B. TVA Board Practice on delegations of authority.
    6. Report of the Community Relations and Energy Efficiency 
Committee.
    A. Lenoir City Park--Public recreation easement.
    For more information: Please call TVA Media Relations at (865) 632-
6000, Knoxville, Tennessee. People who plan to attend the meeting and 
have special needs should call (865) 632-6000. Anyone who wishes to 
comment on any of the agenda in writing may send their comments to: TVA 
Board of Directors, Board Agenda Comments, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.

    Dated: August 13, 2008.
Maureen H. Dunn,
General Counsel and Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-19182 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2
                                                                    ------------



                         Consent of Independent Auditors
                         -------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No's. 33-81044, 333-19753 and 333-74197) and Form S-3 (No. 333-95361)
of Electric Fuel Corporation of our report dated February 26, 1999 relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Electric Fuel Corporation as of December 31,
1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of loss, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1998 which report appears in the December 31, 1998
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electric Fuel Corporation.


                                    /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman
                                    ---------------------------
                                           Kesselman & Kesselman
                                    Certified Public Accountants (Israel)



Jerusalem, Israel
March 14, 2000
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 850

To ratify the States’ right to limit congressional terms.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 7, 1995

Mrs. FOWLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To ratify the States’ right to limit congressional terms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RATIFICATION OF STATES’ RIGHTS.

4 Each State may prescribe the number of terms a per5 son may be elected or appointed to the Senate or House

6 of Representatives.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Sawyer, Appellant.

[677 NYS2d 799]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Cotter, J.), rendered October 18, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the photographic array from which the complainant identified the defendant was not unduly suggestive *(see, People v Chipp,*75 NY2d 327, *cert denied*498 US 833; *see also, People v Jackson,*211 AD2d 644). Although the photograph of the defendant was the most clearly focused of the six photographs which comprised the photographic array, there was nothing distinctive about the depiction of the defendant himself that rendered the array unduly suggestive *(see, People v Robert,*184 AD2d 597; *see also, People v Tedesco,*143 AD2d 155), since each of the men depicted had similar facial characteristics and facial hair.

*502The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hoke,*62 NY2d 1022). Miller, J. P., Altman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Yapp Moi Lee, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and director of Smartec Holdings Inc., (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Smartec Holdings Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 19, 2007 

 

/s/ Yapp Moi Lee

Yapp Moi Lee 

President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-232-CR

STEVEN WAYNE WILSON	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child on October 2, 2006.  Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court placed appellant on ten years’ deferred adjudication.  On March 22, 2007, the State moved to proceed to adjudication, alleging that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision by, among other things, having contact with an unchaperoned child under the age of seventeen and accepting and maintaining employment which brought him in contact with children.  

	After a hearing on the State’s motion to adjudicate on May 29, 2007, the trial court found four of the State’s allegations to be true, adjudicated appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and sentenced him to twenty years’ confinement.  Appellant attempts to appeal from this adjudication. 

	At the time of the hearing on the motion to adjudicate, however, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 42.12, section 5(b), provided that “[n]o appeal may be taken from this determination [to adjudicate guilt].”2  It is well- settled under this statute that a defendant has no right to appeal an adjudication of guilt.3  Because of this prohibition against a direct appeal of the determination to adjudicate, we lack jurisdiction to consider appellant’s points.4

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.5

								PER CURIAM

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH	

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  June 5, 2008
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 3

, 20 12

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 12

- 00 464

- CR

NO. 14

- 12

- 00465

- CR

____________

MONDRE KETCHUM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338 th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No s

. 1314068 & 1314266



### MEMORANDUM OP IN ION

Appellant entered guilty plea s to two counts of aggravated robbery with a deadly

weapon . In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial

court sentenced appellant in each case to confinement for 25 yea r s in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice . Appellant filed a pro se notice of

appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

The trial court entered certification s of the defendant ’ s right to appeal in which the

court certified that th ese are plea bargain case s , and the defendant has no right of appeal.2

See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court ’ s certification s are included in the record s

on appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record s support the trial court ’ s

certification s

. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accor dingly, we dismiss the appeal s

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison

.
Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)