alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 782

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to allow members of employee associations to represent their views before the United States Government.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Representation

Improvement Act of 1996’’.

SEC. 2. REPRESENTATION BY FEDERAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.

(a) EXTENSION OF EXEMPTION TO PROHIBITION.—Subsection (d)

of section 205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read

as follows:

‘‘(d)(1) Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) prevents an officer

or employee, if not inconsistent with the faithful performance of

that officer’s or employee’s duties, from acting without compensation

as agent or attorney for, or otherwise representing—

‘‘(A) any person who is the subject of disciplinary, loyalty,

or other personnel administration proceedings in connection

with those proceedings; or

‘‘(B) except as provided in paragraph (2), any cooperative,

voluntary, professional, recreational, or similar organization

or group not established or operated for profit, if a majority

of the organization’s or groups’s members are current officers

or employees of the United States or of the District of Columbia,

or their spouses or dependent children.

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1)(B) does not apply with respect to a covered

matter that—

‘‘(A) is a claim under subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1);

‘‘(B) is a judicial or administrative proceeding where the

organization or group is a party; or

‘‘(C) involves a grant, contract, or other agreement (including a request for any such grant, contract, or agreement) providing for the disbursement of Federal funds to the organization

or group.’’.

(b) APPLICATION TO LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS.—Section

205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at

the end the following:

‘‘(i) Nothing in this section prevents an employee from acting

pursuant to—

‘‘(1) chapter 71 of title 5;

‘‘(2) section 1004 or chapter 12 of title 39;

‘‘(3) section 3 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of

1933 (16 U.S.C. 831b);
H. R. 782—2

‘‘(4) chapter 10 of title I of the Foreign Service Act of

1980 (22 U.S.C. 4104 et seq.); or

‘‘(5) any provision of any other Federal or District of Columbia law that authorizes labor-management relations between

an agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia and any labor organization that represents

its employees.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

      Re:   Fremont Home Loan Trust, Series 2006-1
            Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-1

      I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

      l. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period included in the year covered by
this report in Form 10-K of Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-1 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

      4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled each of its
obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and

      5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

                                        FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                        By: /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                        Name: Robert McGinnis
                                        Title: President
                                        Date: May 31, 2007
'<>

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

.xv r»e JUN19 2015

T^xclS cou,lit of cRt/nltfa,! Affe&is — -• , , _ ^b©1 Acosta. Clerk .Q.Sc&-r tier.t\cuhdc^ X

jAp^vJljUAJl- -f- \7j (q^Q Ch-e&buejiL Cojjjttyy T*Y&.f

V.

Th-e £ te^t-e o f Tck-c^S X TyL^rt t nicrf yf Appea^iS

tets<- */u*«b-cr&-/$-pn2i>0~C/l s±fL/SL-e^U-e^£-

Arff*.i,jrjL.nf- tftr A/&,noLc?- -FirSt ^iption For wt-ensio* af_

TO th-e. j4o^nfi^SLB TuStitPS of £c->d Coi^rti

C<?yw.^g sisn ^ oScc^r tit,rA/ar*\tA.e7-;A~fpeUr^i>i+ pffi Se.j Cund-Fijes

fh,%5 %nfji~ldh -for cuh zxtes/o* t)-f S(ir^YC6>o) da~ySIn which tof/lc

.a^p^jzi±ioja—ffij^^lscj^^iiati^ry t<cir* e-*" Cja_D]£Lsxn sULppeLr-t -rh-ertpfi^

-h*—SMo-h^S th*L jfzoJULt&LlJi^

.A-ff^llfi-h'f ^P^ cqk viewed In th-e. Ihd PiStrict- comrt of chewIre*.

Tyler CoLcrt o-f a^M &Ws ( Apae(,(aJJre. Co. r•*. yvu.*>\ b<4>S 1%-ft~-<X>Z&a-c(>„

Th+. fr-e<~r.n± ^W///i& for filing, th^_pjDr if TiMe ZB^hj_£4l3r^_

sisfft bath

XH^

r+g.ftj&+- -far «-*• *.X"t*>hSion i3 btuS-ed on (1) A^p*,lia^to. T

,> -for/ried n^faoiLT rh^. Cpt^tt of txypee^fs a,f£ Itr<*zu'rtjf

cchoLut rh-e ccijufrt of ffj0va,is d^JLhJon, to g^i^th i-*^<^( r^prrS^^tt^tlm^

£o-r^i^^&^L&i^Q±jKJzt-Jjt&ti—A't« I-e^fljsjpen CAffiej-l&ja-tls afpell^te

^XfeQ_/j&^^?i^(^Q^^/l^^-t th&Jt-h^ 'ag(( /vet fe.f r****^ •

Afpjutt&ht on th-c p_Qjl_

'j^jftu^^^/2{ijeJl&Mit -fr&±ft, Thi*} a>iA*rf yt:&,ntS-

^rt^hd- th^c de^c/iln^ -For fU)h_g^£h£^JL

Jja, h snj-tT&dU

VU*U

EALSjfl<;mv> tie -m^firm

^b^Aeogta.Cierlr
JLUtM £*>l-U FH

Teui-eSS-e-c Cff(/rnyf I*^*r&~<> J jTj-J^U

pro 5-e

J3LACOLA1E5 t> EC LA RaTXQA/

_"H QSCcoir HeJ^ouin^^^Tf)C^^CJL^noir7Zl^X^J^^l^^ %L£$jgsiTty

ItyCcurc-er&St-cd on -f-ft-e. A\jch(^^( iA" l+- of The Tejrtfcs Qe.pa,H-/n *hf

af crV\<hItta^l—Tii-SJt-l-Cje in And-erson fdv-nJhy, T*k~£e^$; \r^rify_u&dd-eCltcr-e. LLJLcL&r: p-enct,\fy of f>rrjt*~ty i~h^i~ th^. fof^v-elh^. -

5-tuA-r/i* * /* T.S ast* t-ru.* a..* d f.prr*.-af , P*c-e..ctA t^J oh -H» /s

Th* ft dcLsf q-f j-u.tr&j xei<r e

OStct-r H*rr>a,nd€Zc-erttf/ e,*-T< at" S-ervlc^

X CiiCcoir HefHo-'hiJ-t-'Z'j T0cj--?tai$~7i?£2j fortify j-^^t &- -trot*.

-tuncL cexf-e^t. cxtpyL^^f—^h-^- fotx^Qti&^p±&<udhiifr^\^£^*> yylez-c-ed^

Xkx^Th< Ai-a^LLkcLX—QM—th-c. /nLcJL6^e.( uMit-y-fU?^ f^* " " ''"J

CJu^CO-h-e^ LCUrhfy Ms-fnUJ- Atj-or/ife-yL

y^i. <f,J-.ha.\ /. Pfottnh

P.ot.'fin^ urn

Hu5Ki T* 7r7r<T

Qsctgfc fhv^r^^/si^L

05 rcuR M*.rAScuA/ d*7

TWojC- II j Xdtsr
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CARLOS D. JONES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2257

[December 21, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-9991 CF10B.

Carlos D. Jones, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Stephen J. Noonan, Appellant, v. Manhattan Railway Company and Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Respondents.

Determination affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. (Houghton, J., dissented )
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6215

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MICHAEL WALLACE RICE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00011

- REP

- 2 )

Submitted : June 24, 2021 Decided: June 29, 2021

Before KING and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Wallace Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Calvin Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appe llee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Wallace Rice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release based on the COVID

- 19 pandemic. We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021). Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s alternative determination that the c ircumstances in this case , evaluated in light of the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, did not warrant the grant of compassionate release.
See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 187 (4th Cir. 2021). Accordingly, we affirm the district c ourt’s order. See United States v. Rice , No. 3:05

- cr - 00011

- REP

- 2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the d ecisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit






VENTAS, INC.
CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
THIS CONSULTING AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 13, 2019 (the “Amendment Date”), by and between VENTAS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and T. Richard Riney, a Senior Advisor of the Company (“Consultant”), pursuant to the Consulting Agreement entered into between the Company and Consultant as of October 15, 2019 (the “Agreement”).  Unless otherwise provided, capitalized terms in this Amendment have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.
The Agreement is hereby amended in the following manner.
		
	1.
	In Section 2 of the Agreement, the phrase “the two-month anniversary of the Effective Date” shall be deleted and replaced by the phrase “February 15, 2020” in the first sentence thereof.


In all other respects, the Agreement, as amended hereby, shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and consented to this Amendment on and as of the date first above written.
	
			
	 
	VENTAS, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Edmund M. Brady, III

	 
	



Title:
	Edmund M. Brady, III

	 
	Title:
	SVP and Chief Human Resources Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 
/s/ T. Richard Riney             

	 
	T. Richard Riney
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Riverbed Technology, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Jerry M. Kennelly, as President, and Chief Executive Officer, and Randy S. Gottfried, as Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Riverbed Technology, Inc.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: February 23, 2009 |  | /S/ JERRY M. KENNELLY                       
|                        |  | Jerry M. Kennelly                           
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer       
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                        | 
|Date: February 23, 2009 |  | /S/ RANDY S. GOTTFRIED                      
|                        |  | Randy S. Gottfried                          
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                        |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to Riverbed Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Riverbed Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT (10)(a) 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company and (2) dated April 25, 2014, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of the Separate Account VA-2L, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 333-153773) and related Prospectus of Dreyfus/Transamerica Triple Advantage Variable Annuity. 

 
 



 
 Des Moines, IA 
 April 25,
2014
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alejandro AVILA, Jr, also known as Gregory Luis Salcedo Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-40173. USDC No. C-02-CR-244-1.

Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2003.

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Alejandro Avila, Jr.’s, retained attorney, Albert A. Pena, III, has moved to withdraw as appellate counsel. Retained counsel may withdraw at will; therefore, the motion is GRANTED. As Avila has not provided this court with any indication that his appeal has merit, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael L. Heider, Vice President Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/S/ MICHAEL L. HEIDER                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|Michael L. Heider                                            
|Vice President Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
|April 21, 2004                                               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and will be retained by OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-76624, 333-76592, 333-64478, 33-84042, 33-77132, 33-86156, 333-84816,
333-75424 and 333-96205 of IGEN International, Inc on Form S-8 dated January 11,
2002, Form S-8 dated January 11, 2002, Form S-8 dated July 3, 2001, Form S-8
dated September 15, 1994, Form S-8 dated April 1, 1994, Form S-3 dated April 12,
2002, Form S-3 dated March 22, 2002, Form S-3 dated December 19, 2001, and Form
S-3 dated February 4, 2000, respectively, of our report dated April 11, 2003
(relating to the financial statements of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and for the three years in the period ended December
31, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report of Form 10-K of IGEN International,
Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2003.


DELOITTE AND TOUCHE LLP

McLean, Virginia
June 30, 2003
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Matthew Markin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1)

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nugget Resources Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



Date:    December 30, 2008





/s/ Matthew Markin

Matthew Markin,

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)





---
EXHIBIT 11.
                                        
                         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)
                                        
                                        
                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                      JANUARY 28,     JANUARY 29,
                                          1996           1995
     
     PRIMARY SHARES:
     
     Average common shares outstanding    9,514          8,978
     Common equivalent shares               605             47
                                         10,119          9,025
     
     Net income                           $ 740         $1,824
     Dividend on preferred stock           (240)
     Net earnings applicable to 
       common stock                       $ 500         $1,824
     
     
     Net income per common and common
       equivalent share, primary          $ .05          $ .20
     
     
     
     FULLY DILUTED SHARES:
     
     Average common shares outstanding    9,514         8,978
     Common equivalent shares               605           117
     Potential dilution of convertible
      preferred stock                     1,143
                                         11,262         9,095
     
     Net earnings applicable to 
       common stock                       $ 500        $1,824
     Add back dividend on 
       preferred stock                      240
     Net income for calculating 
       fully diluted earnings per share   $ 740        $1,824
     
     Net income per common and common
       equivalent share, fully diluted    $ .07         $ .20




Note:     Fully diluted earnings per common and common equivalent share do not
     result in dilution of three percent or more or are anti-dilutive and are,
     therefore, not presented separately in the consolidated statements of
     income.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 7, 2018

NO. 03-17-00566-CV

Ex parte City of El Paso 

APPEAL FROM 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD 

JUSTICE PEMBERTON NOT PARTICIPATING

REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART—

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the district court on August 7, 2017. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

part of the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s judgment in part 

and renders judgment as to those parts as follows:

• Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the district court’s judgment are deleted;

• The following paragraph is added as a declaration to the judgment:

The City may lawfully expend proceeds generated from the sale of the Bonds to 

acquire land, design, construct, improve, renovate, and equip a multipurpose performing 

arts and entertainment facility located in downtown El Paso. The term “multipurpose 

performing arts and entertainment,” as a matter of law, includes sports and sporting 

events, but the Facility may not be designed, constructed, improved, renovated, or 

equipped exclusively for sports and sporting events;

• in paragraph 7 of the district court’s judgment, the phrase “Subject to paragraphs 5 and 6 

above” is deleted;

• paragraph 9 of the district court’s judgment is deleted; and
• the second full paragraph on page 4 of the district court’s judgment (page 1587 of the 

clerk’s record) is replaced with the following:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as specified by Texas Government Code 

section 1205.151, this Final Judgment is a permanent injunction against the filing by any 

person or entity of any proceeding contesting the validity of the bonds, the authorization 

of the bonds, the expenditure of money relating to the bonds in conformity with this 

judgment, the provisions made for payment of the bonds or of interest thereon, any matter 

adjudicated by this Final Judgment, and any matter that could have been raised in these 

proceedings.

The remainder of the district court’s judgment is affirmed. Each party shall bear its own costs 

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.