alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kevin G. Moug, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Otter Tail
Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 9, 2004
(173 La. 404)

#### HENNEN et al. v. HENNEN et al.

No. 30178.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 17, 1931.

J. W. Elder, of Ruston, for appellant.

Dhu Thompson, of Monroe, for appellees.

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

ROGERS, J.

Plaintiffs sued for the annulment of a partition sale of some 400 acres of land, for the recovery of the value of the timber cut and removed therefrom, and for the rents and revenues of the property. The court below annulled the partition sale, but rejected as of nonsuit plaintiffs’ demands for the value of the timber cut and for the rents and revenues. Virgil A. Hennen, one of the defendants, appealed suspensively from the judgment, and his appeal was answered bj( the plaintiffs. Subsequently, the appellant was adjudicated a bankrupt, and his trustee, with the consent of the referee in bankruptcy, filed a motion in this court acquiescing in the judgment appealed from,- and praying for the dismissal of the appeal. This motion is opposed by the appellees.

The motion to dismiss must be denied. When an appeal is once lodged in this court, the appellant cannot obtain its dismissal without the consent of the appellee. Code Prac. art. 901; Interdiction of Erichson, 149 La. 895, 90 So. 235; State v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co., 149 La. 968, 90 So. 273.

Eor the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Exhibit
13.2







CERTIFICATION







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Remington Hu, Chief Financial Officer of Yucheng
Technologies Limited (the “Company”), certify, to my knowledge, that the
Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
5, 2008




/s/
      Remington HuName:
      Remington HuTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer







The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 10(a)

 

SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP]

 

ELISABETH M. BENTZINGER

DIRECT LINE: 202.383.0717

E-mail: elisabeth.bentzinger@sutherland.com

 

April 25, 2014

 

VIA EDGAR

 

Board of Directors

Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company

2801 Highway 280 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223

 

Re:                             Protective Variable Annuity NY

Post-Effective Amendment No. 6

 

Directors:

 

We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-179963) by Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company and Variable Annuity Account A of Protective Life with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

 

	
 
    	
Very truly yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By: 
    	
/s/ Elisabeth M. Bentzinger
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Elisabeth M. Bentzinger
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 1265 V

Filed: July 17, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

SARAH STONE

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Danielle Strait, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for petitioner.
Mallori Browne Openchowski, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On September 15, 2017

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) in her left shoulder as a result of an influenza vaccination on October 26, 2015 . Petit ion at 1-2 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 17, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees that “ petitioner ’ s alleged injury is consistent with a

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance wi th

the E

- Government Act of 2002

. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

e ase of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).shoulder injury related to vaccine administration as defined on the Vaccine Injury

Table. ” Id. at 5 . Respondent further agrees that “ petitioner suffered residual effects of her condition for more than six months . . . . [and] ha s satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act .” Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
#### Philip Wolf, Appellant, v. Frank Pindyck, Respondent.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### Darwin Donald Long v. State.

No. 25135.

February 7, 1951.

*Sentell, Beene & Rosser,*Snyder, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of driving a. motor vehicle while *431intoxicated and by a jury assessed a fine of $200.00; hence this appeal.

The proven facts are briefly summarized as follows:

Some officers of Scurry County, being informed of an automobile wreck south of Snyder, in said county, went to the place to make an investigation. Upon arriving there, appellant was found in charge of one of the automobiles, which he said he was driving at the time of the wreck, and he was drunk. He told officers that he had been drinking beer.

There are four bills of exception in the record.

Bill No. 1 complains of the overruling of a motion for a continuance because of the absence of one, T. W. Bowen, by whom appellant alleged he expected to prove that he took Bowen to his (Bowen’s) house some few hours prior to the time he (appellant) was alleged to have been under the influence of intoxicating liquor and that he was not intoxicated at such time. This was a second application for a continuance. There is no affidavit from Bowen in the record, and we do not know even now whether he would testify as to the sobriety of appellant at some undesignated time prior to this accident. Similar testimony to that desired from Bowen is found in the record, and this desired testimony would have been cumulative thereof. This bill is overruled.

Bill No. 2 complains because of the fact that certain statements were testified to by Deputy Sheriff Head as having been made to him by appellant at the. scene of the accident wherein appellant was accused of drunken driving. This bill is incomplete in that it is not shown therein what the witness Head testified to that was objectionable, nor was is shown that appellant was under arrest; but it was claimed that the appellant had not been warned that any statement thus made could be used against him. This bill is overruled.

Bill No. 3 relates to the testimony of Sheriff Lloyd Merritt and is in the same condition as Bill No. 2. In addition thereto, it seems not to have been signed by the trial judge. In any event, this bill is ruled by our action on Bill No. 2 and is overruled.

Bill No. 4 is a bill requesting the trial court to instruct the jury to find a verdict of not guilty. This was refused and we think correctly so.

*432Perceiving no error shown herein, the judgment will be affirmed.
Exhibit (99)
                                                                    -----------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Owens Corning (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the  period  ended  June  30,  2002 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David T. Brown, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ David T. Brown


David T. Brown
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
FIRST DISTRICT,

OCTOBER, 1897.

#### Harris County v. John S. Stewart.

Delivered October 11, 1897.

Fees of City Attorney in State Cases.

A city attorney is not entitled to recover fees for representing the State in a criminal prosecution, unless he makes it appear that he was entitled to represent the State because there was no county attorney in the county.

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before Hon. S. H. Bbasheab.

The opinion of Supreme Court on certified questions in this case is reported in 91 Texas, 133.

*F. L. Schwander*and *John J. Tod,*for appellant.

*Goldthwaite & Moody*and *Lock McDaniel,*for appellee.

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

Upon careful examination of the record, we find that it does not sustain the statement, made in the certificate to the Supreme Court, that no complaints or affidavits were filed with the recorder against the parties who were tried and convicted as stated. What we took to be a statement to this effect was in the testimony of the officer giving what appeared on his record, but this we find on closer examination to be only a statement of the contents of his docket. We can not assume that no affidavits were made, and other parts of the record indicate that there were. The opinion of the Supreme Court holds, that, if there was a county attorney in Harris County the city attorney had no right to represent the State, and consequently no right to recover the fees sued for. It results from this ruling, we think, that the general demurrer to the petition should have been sustained. It does not allege that there was no county attorney in Harris County, nor does it allege that there was a resident criminal district attorney. If this last fact would give rise to the inference that there was no county attorney, as to which we express no opinion, it should have been alleged, as the court could not judicially know the residence of the criminal district attorney. As no allegation was made upon this point, the plaintiff failed to show a state of *2facts which entitled him to appear and represent the State in the prosecution, and consequently, under the decision of the Supreme Court, he failed to show the right to recover the fees sued for.

For the error of the court below in overruling the general demurrer, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

The decision of the Supreme Court disposes of all other questions.

*Reversed and remanded.*
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40974 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

–

Appellee,

v. RODOLFO SARMIENTO

- CERVANTES , Defendant

– Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 318

- 1

Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Sarmiento

Cervantes has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011)

. Sarmiento

- Cervant es h a s not filed a response

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein

. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40974 Document: 00514520657 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018No. 17

- 40974

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

. Accordingly, counsel’s motio n for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40974 Document: 00514520657 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6218 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller 

Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2021 

Mr. EMMER (for himself, Mr. HAGEDORN, Ms. CRAIG, Mr. PHILLIPS, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Ms. OMAR, Mrs. FISCHBACH, and Mr. STAUBER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as 

the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. W.O.C. KORT MILLER PLANTENBERG POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Min7 nesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W.O.C. 

8 Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6218 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller 

5 Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10(b)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-176657) of our report dated March 25, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-176657) of our report dated April 22, 2014, relating to the financial statements of Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account, which appears in such Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.

 

	
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Birmingham, Alabama
    	
 
    
	
April 25, 2014
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the regulations of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the Wyoming Advisory Committee will convene at 10 a.m. and adjourn at 12 p.m. (MST) on Saturday, September 13, 2008 at Little America, 2800 W. Lincolnway, Cheyenne, WY 82009. 

The purpose of the meeting is to conduct orientation and ethics training for the newly appointed committee. The committee will discuss recent Commission and regional activities, discuss current civil rights issues in the state, and plan future activities. 

Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation to the Committee, should contact Malee V. Craft, Director of the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, (303) 866-1040 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission. 

Dated at Washington, DC, August 15, 2008. 

Christopher Byrnes,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E8-19297 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the six month period ended June 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         528
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               528
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,028
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          500
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,428
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,528
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,906
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
 


        

</TABLE>