alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 19, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19190]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 061109296-7009-02]
RIN 0648-XJ49


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery; Quota Transfer

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason quota transfer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the State of North Carolina is 
transferring commercial bluefish quota to the State of New York from 
its 2008 quota. By this action, NMFS adjusts the quotas and announces 
the revised commercial quota for each state involved.

DATES: Effective August 18, 2008, through December 31, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Bryant, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9244, fax (978) 281-9135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from Florida through Maine. The process to set the 
annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state is 
described in Sec.  648.160.
    Two or more states, under mutual agreement and with the concurrence 
of the Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), 
can transfer or combine bluefish commercial quota under Sec.  
648.160(f). The Regional Administrator is required to consider the 
criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) in the evaluation of requests 
for quota transfers or combinations.
    North Carolina has agreed to transfer 100,000 lb (45,359 kg) of its 
2008 commercial quota to New York. The Regional Administrator has 
determined that the criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) have been 
met. The revised bluefish quotas for calendar year 2008 are: New York, 
847,057 lb (384,218 kg); and North Carolina, 2,365,973 lb (1,073,187 
kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: August 13, 2008.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-19190 Filed 8-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
#### Helen O’Boy, as Administratrix, etc., of Michael O’Boy, Deceased, Respondent, v. James Higgins and John Aughton, Appellants.

Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellants to abide event, on the ground that the decided weight of the evidence shows that the scaffold in question was an unfinished scaffold in process of erection at the time of the accident, and, therefore, the defendants were not guilty of negligence.
221 So.2d 119

#### David Ralph Howell WHITE v. STATE.

7 Div. 848.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 3, 1969.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Lloyd G. Hart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for peti- I tioner.

Woodrow Albea and W. Otis MacMahon, III, Anniston, opposed.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

SIMPSON, Justice.

Petition of the State, by its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in White v. State, 45 Ala.App. 1, 221 So.2d 117.

Writ denied.

COLEMAN, HARWÓOD and BLOOD-WORTH, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SECTION OF THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,036,500
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          38,001
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,029
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,120,530
<COMMON>                                        85,474
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      192,717
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             63,921
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 342,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           436,698
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  63,886
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   31,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     15,266
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   512
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 231,056
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,120,530
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       56,686
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             8,570
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      24,278
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      32,848
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         23,838
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 189
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  24,027
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        10,387
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,640
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   13,640
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        7,322
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          37,543
<EPS-BASIC>                                     13,640
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   13,640


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 14 ADDENDUM CODE OF ETHICS FOR FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS
OF WEBCO INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES This Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals of Webco Industries, Inc.
and its Subsidiaries, (Webco) applies to the principal executive officer, the
principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer and the
comptroller of Webco and to persons performing similar functions for Webco.
Webco expects all of its employees to act in accordance with the highest
standards of personal and professional integrity in all aspects of their
activities, to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, to deter
wrongdoing and abide by policies and procedures adopted by Webco that govern
the conduct of its employees, including the category of employees to which this
Code of Ethics relates. This Code of Ethics is intended to supplement the
Webco Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to which this is an Addendum (the
Webco Code of Conduct). You agree to:  (a)
    
    Engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct, including the
ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between
personal and professional relationships;(b)
    
    Avoid conflicts of interest and to disclose to the Board of
Directors of Webco any material transaction or relationship that
reasonably could be expected to give rise to such a conflict;(c)
    
    Take all reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of
non-public information about Webco and its customers obtained or
created in connection with your activities and to prevent the
unauthorized disclosure of such information unless required by
applicable law or regulation or legal or regulatory process;(d)
    
    Produce full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable
disclosure in reports and documents that Webco files with, or submits
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators and in
other public communications made by Webco;(e)
    
    Comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations,
as well as the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations
of which Webco is a member; and(f)
    
    Promptly report any possible violation of this Code of Ethics to
the Board of Directors of Webco or any of the parties or channels
listed in the Webco Code of Conduct. You are prohibited from directly or indirectly taking any action to
fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead Webcos independent
public auditors for the purpose of rendering the financial statements of Webco
misleading. You understand that you will be held accountable for your adherence to
this Code of Ethics. Your failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics
may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of
employment. Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations
of law and may result in civil and criminal penalties for you, your supervisors
and/or Webco. If you have any questions regarding the best course of action in a
particular situation, you should promptly contact the CEO or the CFO of Webco.
You may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any possible violation of this
Code of Ethics.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Obera LLC ) ASBCA No. 63576

)

Under Contract No. FA4890-20-F-0031 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Rebecca E. Pearson, Esq.

 Venable LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Caryl A. Potter, III, Esq.

 Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Maj Danelle McGinnis, USAF

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appellant’s claim, located at Tab 2 of the government’s Rule 4 file, did not 

include a certification as required by the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109. 

On May 26, 2023, the Board issued an Order directing appellant to show that its June 6, 

2022 claim was certified to the contracting officer and to provide a copy of the

certification. By correspondence dated May 26, 2023, appellant informed the Board that 

it had filed a new, properly certified claim with the contracting officer and requested that 

the Board dismiss this appeal without prejudice. By correspondence dated June 2, 2023, 

the government informed the Board that it had no objection to appellant’s request. 

Accordingly, the appeal dismissed from the Board’s docket without prejudice.

Dated: June 6, 2023

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63576, Appeal of Obera LLC, 

rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 6, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 15.

To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders of
Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.
Santa Rosa, California

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited
interim financial information of Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the periods ended April 30, 1999 and 1998, as
indicated in our report dated May 19, 1999; because we did not perform
an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is indicated in
your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
1999 is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-
41050, No. 33-26271, No. 33-12276, No. 33-65132, No. 33-60891, No.
333-13013 and No. 333-69157 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement
No. 33-61177, No. 33-65319 and No. 333-76853 on Forms S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule
436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of
the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a
report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP





San Jose, California
June 14, 1999
























<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6218 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6218

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 15, 2022

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as the ``W.O.C. Kort Miller 
                       Plantenberg Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. W.O.C. KORT MILLER PLANTENBERG POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, shall be known and 
designated as the ``W.O.C. Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``W.O.C. 
Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 2022.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.

                               By Kevin F. McCumber,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
No. 12,876.

#### Pugh & McKoin vs. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company. In Re Pughh & McKoin Applying for Certiorari or Writ of Review to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

*Newton & Vaughan tor*Petitioners.

*Hudson, Potts & Bernstein*for Defendant Railway Company.

Submitted June 18, 1898.

Opinion handed down December 2, 1898.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Watkins, J.

In onr opinion this application presents an alleged erroneous ruling of the Court of Appeals upon a question of fact not examinable under Art. 101 of the Constitution. The writ applied for is therefore refused.
Exhibit
32.1





Certifications
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Houston Wire & Cable Company (the
“Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
Charles A. Sorrentino, as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, and Nicol
G. Graham, as Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of their knowledge, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.





Date:     March
      16, 2009
                /s/ Charles A.
SorrentinoCharles
      A. SorrentinoChief
      Executive OfficerDate:     March
      16, 2009
                /s/ Nicol G. GrahamNicol
      G. GrahamChief
      Financial Officer








This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Houston Wire &
Cable Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of NMS Communications Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Herbert Shumway, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ HERBERT SHUMWAYHerbert Shumway
Chief Financial Officer
April 1, 2008 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 99-10183 Summary Calendar

_____________________ VERNON L. SCHNEIDER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LLOYD M. BENTSEN, Secretary, Department of Treasury; NICHOLAS BRADY,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-2783-X)

_________________________________________________________________ August 4, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Vernon L. Schneider, pro se , appeals the dismissal of his

employment discrimination claims arising out of the termination of

his employment with the Internal Revenue Service, the denial of his

motions for leave to amend his complaint, and the denial of his

motion for reconsideration. Schneider contends that the district

court erred by holding that his complaint was not timely filed and

that he had not exhausted administrative remedies.- 2 -

Pursuant to our review of the record and briefs, we conclude

that the district court did not commi t reversible error by

dismissing the complaint, denying leave to amend, and denying

reconsideration. Accordingly, the judgment and orders appealed

from are AFFIRMED

. (Schneider’s motion for appointment of counsel

is DENIED .)

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2
                       CERTIFICATION

I, Neal E. Schmale, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pacific
Enterprises;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this Quarterly Report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this Quarterly Report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being
prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report, based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

November 4, 2004

/S/ NEAL E. SCHMALE
Neal E. Schmale
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      23.1








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
      Equity Inns, Inc. on Form S-3 (Files No. 333-47761, 333-63253, 333-117421,
      333-128981, 333-25013 and 333-25017) of our report dated February 27, 2007,
      relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules,
      management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
      which appears in this


Form
      10-K.





/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP





Memphis,
      Tennessee


February
      27, 2007
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129804 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129804 COA: 261091 Wayne CC: 00-007838 HERBERT J. MORTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

p0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk