alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2  Amended and Restated Note - Jensen












AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO 
PROMISSORY NOTE


This instrument is Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”), dated as of April 30, 2014, to the Promissory Note dated as of October 12, 2011 (the “Promissory Note”) issued by American Power Group, Inc. (the “Company”) to Lyle Jensen (the “Holder”). Terms used in this Amendment without definition which are defined in the Promissory Note have the same meanings in this Amendment as in the Promissory Note unless otherwise provided herein.    
    
WHEREAS, the Company has previously issued the Promissory Note to the Holder and amended the Promissory Note on April 27, 2012;


WHEREAS, the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect with this Amendment No. 2; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder now desire to further amend the Promissory Note; 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, the Company and the Holder, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	The first paragraph of the Promissory Note is hereby amended by:




		
	(a)
	deleting the reference to “the second anniversary of the Closing (as defined below)” therein and replacing it with “September 30, 2014”;




		
	(b)
	deleting the reference to “at a rate equal to ten percent (10%) per annum” therein and replacing it with “at a rate equal to eight percent (8%) per annum”; and




		
	(c)
	deleting the following sentence at the end of such paragraph:




“Notwithstanding the foregoing, commencing on the sale of at least $7,000,000 of Convertible Preferred Stock pursuant to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement by and among GreenMan Technologies, Inc. (“GreenMan”) and certain Purchasers (as defined therein) and the receipt by the GreenMan of $7,000,000 before payment of applicable fees and expenses (the “Closing”), the interest rate on this Note shall be reduced from ten percent (10%) per annum to eight percent (8%) per annum.” 


2.    The Holder waives any prior default under the Promissory Note.


3.    Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect. 
4.    This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa, excluding with respect to conflict of laws and each Party irrevocably (i) agrees that any action or proceeding arising from or relating to this Amendment may be brought only in the courts of Iowa or the U.S. District Court located in Des Moines, Iowa, (ii) consents, for itself and in respect of its property, to the jurisdiction of each such court in any such action or proceeding, and (iii) waives any objection to proceeding in such venue, including that the forum is inconvenient. 











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.




American Power Group, Inc.
        


By:/s/Charles E. Coppa        
Charles E. Coppa
Treasurer




HOLDER:


        
/s/Lyle Jensen                
Lyle Jensen
**EXHIBIT 12.1**PACIFIC ENTERPRISES**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES**AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS**(Dollars in millions)
Six months
ended
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
June 30, 2006
Fixed Charges:
Interest 
 $           88 
 $          63 
 $          54 
 $         47 
 $          55 
 $            38 
Interest portion of annual rentals
3 
2 
2 
2 
3 
2 
Preferred dividends of subsidiary
2 
 
2 
 
2 
 
2 
 
2 
 
1 
Total fixed charges
93 
67 
58 
51 
60 
41 
Preferred stock dividends
           7 
 
            7 
 
           7 
 
           7 
 
           6 
 
            3 
Combined fixed charges and preferred 
    stock dividends for purpose of ratio
 $         100 
 
 $          74 
 
 $         65 
 
 $         58 
 
 $         66 
 
 $          44 
Earnings:
Pretax income from continuing operations
 $        377 
 $        383 
 $        361 
 $        390 
 $        324 
 $          206 
Total fixed charges (from above)
93 
67 
58 
51 
60 
41 
Less:  interest capitalized
               - 
 
               - 
 
             - 
 
             - 
 
             - 
 
                 - 
Total earnings for purpose of ratio
 $         470 
 
 $        450 
 
 $        419 
 
 $        441 
 
 $        384 
 
 $          247 
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed 
    charges and preferred stock dividends
         4.70 
 
        6.08 
 
       6.45 
 
       7.60 
 
       5.82 
 
          5.61 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
       5.05 
 
        6.72 
 
       7.22 
 
        8.65 
 
       6.40 
 
         6.02 
(1) In computing this ratio, "Preferred dividends of subsidiary" represents the before-tax earnings necessary to pay such dividends, 
computed at the effective tax rates for the applicable periods.**********
#### Melvin ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-6437.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.

Decided Aug. 20, 2003.

Melvin Adams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Adams seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A). For thirty days thereafter, the district court may grant an extension of time to file a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its judgment on March 8, 1994. Thus, Adams’ notice of appeal, filed on August 29, 2002,* is un*272timely, and we dismiss the appeal on that basis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Giving Adams the most liberal interpretation of *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), August 29, 2002, is the earliest date his notice of appeal could have been filed.
#### Kelvin J. MILES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lloyd WATERS, Warden, Maryland Correctional Institution, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7375.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 18, 2002.

Decided Nov. 8, 2002.

Kelvin J. Miles, Appellant Pro Se.

*130Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin J. Miles seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Miles has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000); *Slack,*529 U.S. at 484. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 632 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 632

 To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2021

  Mr. Young introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maritime Lien Reform Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON MARITIME LIENS ON FISHING PERMIT AND PERMIT 
              DESCRIPTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter I of chapter 313 of title 46, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing permit and permit 
              description
    ``(a) In General.--This chapter--
            ``(1) does not establish a maritime lien on a permit that--
                    ``(A) authorizes a person or use of a vessel to 
                engage in fishing; and
                    ``(B) is issued under State or Federal law; and
            ``(2) does not authorize any civil action to enforce a 
        maritime lien on such a permit.
    ``(b) Treatment of Fishing Permits.--A fishing permit--
            ``(1) is governed solely by the State or Federal law under 
        which it was issued; and
            ``(2) is not included in the whole of a vessel or as an 
        appurtenance or intangible of a vessel for any purpose.
    ``(c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in subsections 
(a) and (b) shall be construed as imposing any limitation upon the 
authority of the Secretary of Commerce to modify, suspend, revoke, or 
sanction any Federal fishery permit issued by the Secretary of Commerce 
or to bring a civil action to enforce such modification, suspension, 
revocation, or sanction.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
31309 the following:

``31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing permit and permit 
                            description.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of LILM, Inc. (the "Company") on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,**George I. Norman, III**, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.            Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **GEORGEI.NORMAN,III** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**George I. Norman, III**

Principal Accounting Officer

August 7, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon            request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 31


I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of GSAMP Trust 2006-S2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange
Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC,
as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee.


                                               Date: April 4, 2007



                                               /s/ Michelle Gill
                                               ----------------------------
                                               Michelle Gill
                                               Vice President
                                               GS Mortgage Securities Corp.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 15
                                                                    ----------

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



                                       November  13, 1995



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          Re:                     Pacific Bell
                       Registration Statement on Form S-3
                       ------------------------------------

We are  aware that our  report dated November  13, 1995 on  our review  of the
interim  financial information of Pacific Bell and Subsidiaries for the three-
and nine-month  periods ended September 30, 1995 included in this Form 10-Q is
incorporated by reference in the Company's registration statement as follows:

     Form S-3:  Pacific Bell $1.575 Billion Debt Securities

Pursuant to Rule  436(c) under the Securities Act of  1933, this report should
not be considered a part of  the registration statement prepared or  certified
by us within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


                                       Very truly yours,




                                       /s/Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
June 5, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KENNETH LEE DOUDS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00642

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ We order that this Court’s former judgment of October 15, 2013 is vacated. We further order this Court’s opinions of October 15, 2013 withdrawn. This cause, an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s “Motion to Suppress Blood Test” and “Motion to Suppress Test, Videotape, Statements,” signed May 4, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record

revea ls error in the portion of the order denying appellant’s “Motion to Suppress Blood Test.” This Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with the Court’s opinion.

We order THE STA TE OF TEXAS to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Walter F. Trotter, as Receiver, etc., of Gilman-McNeill Company, Who Sues in His Own Behalf and in Behalf of All Other Creditors of the Defendant Iron Railway Company, etc., Appellant, v. Frederick J. Lisman and Others, Individually and as Copartners under the Firm Name of F. J. Lisman & Co., and Iron Railway Company, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave, to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. No opinion. McLaughlin and Houghton, JJ., dissenting.
#### John W. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 02-3383.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 29, 2002.

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2002 WL 31553806.

*983The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 531 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Great Western Scenic Trail as a study trail under the 
          National Trails System Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POTENTIAL ADDITION OF GREAT WESTERN SCENIC TRAIL TO NATIONAL 
              TRAIL SYSTEM GREAT WESTERN TRAIL.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(38) The Great Western Scenic Trail, a system of trails to 
accommodate a variety of travel users in a corridor of approximately 
3,100 miles in length extending from the Arizona-Mexico border to the 
Idaho-Montana-Canada border, following the approximate route depicted 
on the map identified as `Great Western Trail Corridor, 1988', which 
shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of 
the Chief of the Forest Service, United States Department of 
Agriculture. The trail study shall be conducted by the Secretary of 
Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, in 
accordance with subsection (b) and shall include--
            ``(A) the current status of land ownership and current and 
        potential use along the designated route;
            ``(B) the estimated cost of acquisition of lands or 
        interests in lands, if any; and
            ``(C) an examination of the appropriateness of motorized 
        trial use along the trail.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,721
<SECURITIES>                                    10,523
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,389
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,087
<PP&E>                                         242,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,785
<BONDS>                                        170,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,085
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,189
<SALES>                                         76,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,079
<CGS>                                           67,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,711)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,711)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 625 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand school choice opportunities for children of active duty members of the Armed Forces of 

the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2021 

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. 

TIFFANY, Mr. RICE of South Carolina, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. 

CALVERT, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mr. LATTA, Mr. HAGEDORN, 

Mr. PERRY, and Mr. CARL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

school choice opportunities for children of active duty 

members of the Armed Forces of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Child Edu5 cational Freedom Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 625 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RULE FOR HOME SCHOOLS OF ACTIVE 

2 DUTY MILITARY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 530(b)(3) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(D) SPECIAL RULE FOR HOME SCHOOLS

7 OF ACTIVE DUTY MEMBERS OF THE ARMED

8 FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES.—For pur9 poses of clauses (i) and (iii) of subparagraph 

10 (A), if either the taxpayer or the spouse of the 

11 taxpayer is serving on extended active duty 

12 (within the meaning of section 32(c)(4)) in the 

13 Armed Forces of the United States at the time 

14 the expense is incurred, the terms ‘public, pri15 vate, or religious school’ and ‘school’ shall in16 clude any home school which provides elemen17 tary or secondary education if such school is 

18 treated under State law as a home school or a 

19 private school.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS