alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SECTION OF THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,023,000
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          36,474
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        45,198
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,104,672
<COMMON>                                        85,474
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      192,717
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             93,589
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 371,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           436,753
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  28,867
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     14,996
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   533
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 251,743
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,104,672
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      175,171
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            27,403
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      74,433
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     101,836
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         73,335
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 132
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  73,467
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        30,159
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,308
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   43,308
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       22,047
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         110,175
<EPS-BASIC>                                     43,308
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   43,308



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 164 (Friday, August 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private 
consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes 
entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the 
Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable 
rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with 
Range of Maturities.'' This rate may be revised quarterly by the 
Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the 
Department of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 11\1/8\% for 
the quarter ended June 30, 2008. This interest rate will remain in 
effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of 
any change.

    Dated: August 13, 2008.
Molly P. Dawson,
Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.
 [FR Doc. E8-19502 Filed 8-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-P
STRATS TRUST FOR ALLSTATE CORPORATION SECURITIES, SERIES 2006-3 10-K

Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATION



I,
Barbara Garafalo, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of STRATS Trust For Allstate Corporation Securities, Series 2006-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2.       Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.       Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;



4.       Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all
material respects; and



5.       All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except
as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.



In
giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The
Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee.





|Dated: | March 29, 2024 | By: | /s/
    Barbara Garafalo                                  | 
|------ | -------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------- | 
|       |                |     | Barbara Garafalo                                          | 
|       |                |     | President                                                 | 
|       |                |     | (senior officer of depositor in charge of securitization) |
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6218 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 15, 2022 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Minnesota, as 

the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 6218 RDS

1 SECTION 1. W.O.C. KORT MILLER PLANTENBERG POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 317 Blattner Drive in Avon, Min5 nesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘W.O.C. 

6 Kort Miller Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘W.O.C. Kort Miller 

11 Plantenberg Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 14, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 

By KEVIN F. MCCUMBER, 

Deputy Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 14, 2010

p0511 

# Order

May 14, 2010

140111

KEVIN ZOERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140111 COA:285105 Kent CC: 06-009271-NF TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

BRANDY ZOERMAN, Third-Party Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 20, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J. ( dissenting ).

I respectfully dissent from this Court’s order denying defendant’s application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissent from the order denying defendant’s
motion for reconsideration of our earlie r order denying leave to appeal in Detroit Medical

Ctr v Titan Ins Co , 485 Mich 1008 (2009) (reported below: 284 Mich App 409 [2009]), recon den May 14, 2010 (SC 138869).

C ORRIGAN

, J., joins the statement of M ARKMAN

, J.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20881 Conference Calendar

__________________ LINDSEY MCADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus OSHA, Director, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-94-436
- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lindsey McAdams has appealed the district court's dismissal of his suit, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Nevertheless, he has failed to brief any issue. Issues that are not briefed are deemed abandoned. See United States v. Wilkes , 20 F.3d 651, 653 (5th Cir. 1994); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Because he has abandoned any appellate issue, McAdams's appeal is frivolous, and it is DISMISSED as such. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. We caution McAdams that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition ofNo. 95-20881 -2- sanctions. To avoid sanctions, McAdams is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Elijah Lazarus, Respondent, v. Daniel Sheehan and Others, Constituting the Board of Fire Commissioners of Elmira, New York, Appellants.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs.
18344.

#### Hampton *v.*Stevenson, Superintendent.

Argued September 15, 1953

Decided October 13, 1953.

*Kenneth L. Leake,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Robert H. Hall, Lamar W. Sizemore, Assistant Attorneys-General, Delman L. Minchew,*contra.

Hawkins, Justice.

1. Under section 19 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 291, 302) and the decisions of this court dealing with previous acts containing similar provisions, no action taken against a child under the provisions of that act shall be denominated as a criminal action nor an adjudication as a conviction of a criminal offense, but proceedings thereunder are civil and not criminal. Therefore, article VI, section IV, paragraph I, of the Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-3901), that “The Superior Courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction . . . in criminal cases where the offender is subjected to loss of life, or confinement in the penitentiary,” and article I, section I, paragraph V of the Constitution of 1945 (Code, Ann., § 2-105), that “Every person charged with an offense against the laws of this State . . . shall have a public and speedy trial by an impartial jury,” have no application to a proceeding under the Juvenile Court Act, supra; and that act and the judgment of the Juvenile Court thereunder committing to the Georgia Training School for Colored Girls a female child under 17 years of age who has violated a State law by stabbing another with a butcher knife are not invalid as being violative of either of the foregoing provisions of the Constitution. *Williams*v. *Davidson,*147 *Ga.*491 (94 S. E. 564); *Wingate*v. *Gornto,*147 *Ga.*192 (93 S. E. 206); *Taylor*v. *Means,*139 *Ga.*578 (77 S. E. 373); *Garner*v. *Wood,*188 *Ga.*463 (4 S. E. 2d 137); 31 Am. Jur. 785, § 4.

2. The question of whether the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 seeks to deprive the superior courts of jurisdiction to try offenders of the ages therein referred to for crimes committed by them is not involved under the facts of this case and will not be passed upon.

3. The trial judge did not err in dismissing the habeas corpus proceeding and in remanding the person sought to be released to the custody of the respondent, the Superintendent of the Georgia Training School for Colored Girls.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6187 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6187

 To maintain the National Coal Council in the Department of Energy to 
   provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
 matters related to coal and the coal industry, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 8, 2021

   Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mrs. Miller of West 
   Virginia, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. Curtis, Mr. Mooney, Mr. 
  Armstrong, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Moore of Alabama, Mr. Bost, Ms. 
  Cheney, and Mr. Rogers of Kentucky) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To maintain the National Coal Council in the Department of Energy to 
   provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on 
 matters related to coal and the coal industry, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coal Council Certainty Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL COAL COUNCIL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Energy shall maintain the 
National Coal Council, in accordance with the charter for such council 
that is in effect on November 19, 2021.
    (b) Applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Federal 
        Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) and section 552b(c) of 
        title 5, United States Code, shall apply to the National Coal 
        Council.
            (2) Termination.--Section 14 of the Federal Advisory 
        Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to the National 
        Coal Council.
                                 <all>
```
#### ADAMS v. SIMON.

No. 14250.

. Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Oct. 31, 1932.

Hugh M. Wilkinson, of New Orleans, for appellant.

St. Clair Adams, Jr., and Michael M. Irwin, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

HIGGINS, J.

This is a suit by an attorney for professional services rendered Mrs. Simon in connection with a suit against her husband for separation. It is brought against her husband, Dr. Simon, under the authority of Gosserand v. Monteleone, 159 La. 316, 105 So. 356, 42 A. L. R. 310. Plaintiff claimed $750 and was awarded $350 by the trial court. Defendant has appealed, and plaintiff has answered the appeal, asking for an increase in the award.

Liability is admitted. The sole question at issue is the value of plaintiff’s services. The services rendered consisted of a number of office conferences and the preparation of a petition for separation, application for injunction, impounding the community, rule for alimony and for custody of a chi.ld. The case was not tried, but on the day fixed for trial was discontinued by plaintiff at the request of Mrs. Simon, who reported that she had been reconciled to her husband. The preparation of the petition was somewhat out of the ordinary, and required more than perfunctory service, since the details which go to make up the charge of cruelty, upon which the suit was based, are out of the ordinary and necessitated more than the usual attention.

 The question of the value of a lawyer’s services is not always easy to estimate, and is a subject concerning which there miglit be honest difference of opinion, and one which we approach with an appreciation of - its delicacy. Results obtained, financial condition of client, ability of counsel, are factors to be considered in reaching a conclusion concern-ifig the value of legal services. Plaintiff is a reputable lawyer of high standing at this bar, and his services are in consonance with the best practices of the profession. Defendant, vicariously liable for a debt incurred by his wife, is a man of moderate income and with little or no property. Under all the circumstances, we believe the amount awarded by our brother below to be fair and reasonable.

For the reasons herein assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
----

----

|   | (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August      14, 2008 | /s/                          |
|----------------------|------------------------------|
|                 | Richard      Ivanovick       |
|                 | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
#### John Paul TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-2083.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 18, 2002.

Decided Nov. 7, 2002.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying his *motion to*proceed in forma pauperis and striking this action from the docket. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. *611Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. *See Turner v. United States,*No. MISC-02-35-7 (W.D.Va. filed Aug. 27, 2002; entered Aug. 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                             357
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      807
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     98,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,103
<PP&E>                                          69,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,609
<BONDS>                                            439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,481
<SALES>                                        225,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,086
<CGS>                                          146,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                       704
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          972
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,666
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.28


</TABLE>