alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
cboe_Ex10_28


		
			Exhibit 10.28
		

		
			 
		

		
			[CBOE LETTERHEAD]
		

		
			 
		

		
			PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
		

		
			David Howson
		

		
			[***Personally 
		

		
			        identifiable 
		

		
			      information omitted***]
		

		
			 
		

		
			December 19, 2019 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear Dave,
		

		
			 
		

		
			I am pleased to extend an offer of employment to you as President, Cboe Europe Limited. The effective date of your new role will be January 1, 2020, however, your continuous service will be deemed to have commenced on the date you joined Cboe Global Markets on June 11, 2013. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			You will receive a base salary of £420,000 annually paid in accordance with our regular payroll practices. You will be eligible to participate in the annual short-term discretionary incentive plan with a target percentage of 110%, subject to the financial performance of the Company as well as your individual performance. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			In addition, you will be eligible for a long term incentive grant of a targeted amount of $650,000 (USD), of which $325,000 will be RSU and $325,000 will be PSU, subject to typical Committee and Board approval in February 2020.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Health insurance will be provided for you and your family. And, an annualized matched pension contribution of up to 5% of your base salary will be provided. Finally, you will receive 30 days of paid vacation days per calendar year. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Upon acceptance we will forward you a draft contract for your review and consideration.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dave, you have my commitment and confidence in your leadership as you assume this pivotal role. I am truly excited about our future prospects as you help drive our business forward!  
		

		
			 
		

		
			Yours sincerely,
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Ed Tilly
		

		
			Chairman, CEO and President
		

		
			Cboe Global Markets
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Edward T. Tilly12/19/19
		

		
			SignatureDate
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ D. Howson
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Advisory 

                    Environmental Health Sciences Council, September 9, 2008, 8:30 a.m. to September 10, 2008, 5 p.m., Nat. Inst. of Environmental Health Sciences, Building 101, Rodbell Auditorium, 111 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 4, 2008, E8-17728.                 

Time change for September 9, 2008, open session 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m. and closed 3 p.m.-5 p.m.; September 10, 2008, closed session 8:30 a.m.-4 p.m. The meeting is partially closed to the public. 

Dated: August 8, 2008. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-18873 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMUEL L. RIDDLE, JR.

Defendant.

___________________________________/

CASE NO. 09-20295

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF NEW ATTORNEY

Before the Court is Defendant’s Notice of New Attorney (Doc. No. 31). On July 16,

2009, David Steingold entered his appearance as attorney on behalf of Defendant Sam

Riddle, Jr. On October 27, 2009, Defendant filed a Notice of New Attorney, identifiying

Richard Convertino. The Court notes that Steingold, a CJA appointment, continues to

represent Defendant. Further, Convertino already has appeared in this matter as retained

counsel for Riddle’s co-defendant, Mary Waters. 

A defendant has the right to represent himself pro se or to be represented by an

attorney. United States v. Halbert, 640 F.2d 1000, 1009 (9th Cir. 1981). Defendant is not

free to pick and choose which pleadings will be filed by his counsel of record and which he

will file on his own behalf. Because Defendant is represented, the Court will not entertain

pro se pleadings. See Vieira v. Wong, No. 05-cv-1492 (E. D. Cal. April 22, 2009). 

Accordingly, the Court STRIKES the notice. Defendant is hereby advised that the

Court will not accept further pro se filings. Further communication with the Court must be

through his counsel of record.

2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW Doc # 35 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 94
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: November 2, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon counsel of record on this date by ordinary

mail and/or electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

 Deputy Clerk

2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW Doc # 35 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 95
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor
         International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June
         30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
         date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward F. Cooke, Chief Financial Officer
         of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
         Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:   August 11, 2006
         ---------------

By: /s/ EDWARD F. COOKE
    ------------------------------------
    Edward F. Cooke
    Chief Financial Officer


                                    Page 46
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 848 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 848

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 1996

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
                       Military Park in Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize and direct 
the National Park Service to assist the State of Georgia in relocating 
a highway affecting the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military 
Park in Georgia'', approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 1442), is 
amended by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$51,900,000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         120,018
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,822
<INVENTORY>                                     23,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,318
<PP&E>                                         193,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,186
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       218,439
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,944
<SALES>                                         89,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,864
<CGS>                                           63,191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,191
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,202
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,219
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
February 20, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

D.R. HORTON - TEXAS, LTD., Appellant

NO. 14-12-01150-CV V.

WILLIAM BERNHARD AND NADIA BERNHARD, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, William 

Bernhard and Nadia Bernhard, signed November 12, 2012, was heard on the 

transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the 

judgment awarding appellate attorney’s fees. We therefore REFORM the 

judgment of the court below by striking the following two paragraphs:

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event of appeal of 

this judgment to the court of appeals, Defendant D.R. HortonTexas, Ltd. shall pay Plaintiffs $18,500.00 in attorney’s fees 

defending this judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event of appeal 

from any adverse ruling by the court of appeals, Defendant D.R. 

Horton-Texas, Ltd. shall pay Plaintiffs $25,000.00 in attorney’s 

fees defending this judgment.”

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified 

in this judgment.

We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 6, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 128315 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### WILLIAM D. NUMERICK, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 128315 COA: 249172 Gd Traverse CC: 03-001891-DP HEATHER A. KRULL, a/k/a HEATHER A. SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH


### , J., would grant leave to appeal.

p0929 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 6, 2005

Clerk
**Exhibit
      23.1**







**Consent
        of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
  We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form
        S-8 (Nos. 333-74197, 333-86728 and 333-124960) (pertaining to the 1995 Amended
        and Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Non-Executive
        Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan and the 2004 Stock
        Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-95361,
        333-33986, 333-37630, 333-45818, 333-49628, 333-59346, 333-63514, 333-99559,
        333-99673, 333-106420, 333-110729, 333-112611, 333-124959, 333-124961,
        333-128497 and 333-129713) of our report dated June 15, 2006 with respect
        to
        Arotech management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
        financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
        reporting of Arotech, included in this Form 10-K/A.
  
 
 /s/
        Kost,
        Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer
 Kost,
        Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer
 A
        Member
        of Ernst & Young Global
 
 
 
 Tel-Aviv,
        Israel
 June
        15,
        2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CITY OF BETHLEHEM,

Respondent

v.

ALVIN S. KANOFSKY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 778 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 740 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 H.R. 740

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

    Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28, United States 
Code, and section 12 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or 
any other law which would interpose or support a defense of 
untimeliness, jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the United States 
Court of Federal Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment on any 
claim by Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico against the United 
States with respect to any lands or interests therein the State of New 
Mexico or any adjoining State held by aboriginal title or otherwise 
which were acquired from the tribe without payment of adequate 
compensation by the United States. As a matter of adequate 
compensation, the United States Claims Court may award interest at a 
rate of five percent per year to accrue from the date on which such 
lands or interests therein were acquired from the tribe by the United 
States. Such jurisdiction is conferred only with respect to claims 
accruing on or before August 13, 1946, and all such claims must be 
filed within three years after the date of enactment of this Act. Such 
jurisdiction is conferred notwithstanding any failure of the tribe to 
exhaust any available administrative remedy.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

    Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the Pueblo of Isleta 
Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act under any judgment of the Indian Claims 
Commission or any other authority with respect to any lands that are 
the subject of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall not 
be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such claim, and shall 
not otherwise affect the entitlement to, or amount of, any relief with 
respect to such claim.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 788

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974

to prohibit the consideration of retroactive tax increases.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1995

Mr. ROYCE (for himself, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. EMERSON, Mr.

SAXTON, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. CHRISTENSEN, Mrs. SMITH of Washington,

Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. ROTH,

Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. BURTON of Indiana,

Mr. HEINEMAN, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. ROGERS, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. LONGLEY,

Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. FIELDS of Texas, Mr.

THORNBERRY, Mr. MYERS of Indiana, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. BUNN of Oregon, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, Mr. GEKAS, Mr.

LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. CANADY of Florida, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania,

Mr. BURR, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. BRYANT of Tennessee, Mr. JONES, Mr.

WELLER, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, and Mr. DORNAN) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

A BILL

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to prohibit the consideration of retroactive tax increases.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizens’ Tax Protec5 tion Act’’.
2

•HR 788 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET

2 AND IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL ACT OF 1974.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Congressional

4 Budget Act of 1974 is amended by adding at the end the

5 following:

6 ‘‘PROHIBITION ON THE CONSIDERATION OF RETROACTIVE

7 TAX INCREASES

8 ‘‘SEC. 314. (a) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order

9 in the House of Representatives or the Senate to consider

10 any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or con11 ference report carrying any retroactive tax increase.

12 ‘‘(b) INCREASES A TAX.—The term ‘increase’ shall

13 include any change to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

14 that would result in an increase in tax for any taxpayer.

15 ‘‘(c) Subsection (a) may be waived in the House of

16 Representatives only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths

17 of the Members voting.’’.

18 (b) SUPERMAJORITY POINT OF ORDER.—Subsections

19 (c) and (d) of section 904 of the Congressional Budget

20 Act of 1974 are amended by inserting ‘‘314,’’ after

21 ‘‘313,’’.

22 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con23 tents set forth in section 1(b) of the Congressional Budget
3

•HR 788 IH

1 and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 is amended by in2 serting after the item relating to section 313 the following:

‘‘Sec. 314. Prohibition on the consideration of retroactive tax increases.’’.

Æ
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-5203

_____________________________

NATHANIEL WILBANKS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

John C. Cooper, Judge.

June 4, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Nathaniel Wilbanks, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
      Line
      Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Robert O. Bond, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i)   The Report fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934, as amended; and (ii)   The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





/s/   ROBERT
      O. BOND


Name:
      Robert O. Bond


Title:   President
      and Chief Operating Officer


Date:   August
      9, 2007














This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 418

For the relief of Arthur J. Carron, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Arthur J. Carron, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

4 The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of

5 title 31, United States Code, shall not apply with respect

6 to a claim by Arthur J. Carron, Jr., of Bark River, Michi7 gan, for amounts due to him by the Department of the

8 Navy. The amounts due are represented by the following

9 checks that were received but not negotiated by Arthur

10 J. Carron, Jr.:
2

•HR 418 IH

1 (1) Treasury check number 2,831,843, dated

2 October 18, 1966, in the amount of $10,850.74 for

3 salary and expenses.

4 (2) Treasury check number 10,445,856, dated

5 January 29, 1971, in the amount of $1,361.00 for

6 salary and expenses.

7 (3) Treasury check number 71,681,041, dated

8 April 1, 1971, in the amount of $562.25 for retire9 ment pay.

10 SEC. 2. DEALINE.

11 Section 1 shall apply only if Arthur J. Carron, Jr.,

12 or his authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant

13 to such section before the expiration of the 3-month period

14 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ