T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t a bl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J AM ES ER I C S CHEI DT, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10003 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 2 9 3 - A WI ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A nthony W . I s hi i , C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d M cK E O W N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J a m e s E r i c S c he i dtappe a l s f r om the 324- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e a c onvi c t i on f orr e c e i ptordi s tr i but i on of m a t e r i a l i nvol vi ng the s e xua l e xpl oi t a t i on of

m i nor s , i n vi ol a t i on of

18 U . S . C . § 2252( a ) ( 2) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e va c a t e a nd r e m a nd. S c h e id t c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t p la in ly e rr e d b y in c lu d in g , in its c a lc u la tio n o f

h is a d v is o ry S e n te n c in g G u id e lin e s r a n g e , f o u rp o in ts r e la te d to 

# FI LED JAN 04 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10003 2 di s tr i but i on of

c hi l d pornogr aphy unde rU . S . S . G . §§ 2G 2. 2( b) ( 1) a nd 2G 2. 2(b)(3)(F). W e have notye tre sol ved t he i ss ue of w hether the use of afi l eshar i ng prog ra m , w i tho utm ore, ca n sup po rtthe aw ar d o f di stri bu t i on po i nt s und er s e c t i on 2G 2. 2( b) . A c c or di ngl y , a ny e rr oron the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s pa r tc a nnotbe d e e m e d to h a v e b e e n p la in . Se e U ni t e d Stat e s v . O lano , 507 U . S . 725, 734 ( 1993) ( n o p la in e rr o ru n le s s e rr o ris c le a ru n d e r“c u rr e n t la w ” ) ; U ni t ed Stat es v. T hom ps on , 82 F . 3d 84 9, 85 6 (9t h C i r. 19 96 ) ( “ B ec ause of the ci rc ui tspl i t , the l ac k of c ontr ol l i ng a uthor i ty , a nd the f a c ttha tthe r e i s a tl e a s ts om e r oom f ordoubt a boutthe out c om e of

thi s i s s ue , w e c a nnotbr a nd the c our t ’ s f a i l ur e t o e xc l ude the evi dence ‘ pl ai n err or. ’ ”) . N on ethel es s, the go vernm entconcedes thatthere w as error a nd thati tw ou l d h ave c on ce ded t he di stri bu t i on i ss ue had cou nsel obj ec t ed at s e nt e nc i ng. A c c or di ngl y , the be tt e rc our s e i s f orus t o r e m a nd f

orc ons i de r a t i on of thi s i ss ue i n the fi rs ti nst ance . S c he i dta l s o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc our t ’ s r e s t i tut i on or de rs houl d be v a c a te d , a s th e r e w a s n o e v id e n c e th a t h is c r im e p r o x im a te ly c a u s e d q u a n tif iab le l os s e s , ori nde e d a ny l os s e s , t o the na m e d vi c t i m s . A f t e rthe e ntry of

j udgm e nt be l ow , w e de c i de d U

ni t e d Stat e s v . Ke nne dy , 64 3 F . 3d 12 51 (9th C i r. 20 11 ), w hi ch se tforth a fr am ew ork for anal yz i ng m andat ory r es t i tut i on orders un der10- 10003 3 1 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 9 . O n r e m a n d , th e d is tr ic t c o u r t s h a ll r e v is it its r e s titu tio n o r d e rin l i ghtof the f r a m e w or k s e tf

or th i n Ke nne dy . I n vi e w of

the r e m a nd, i ti s unne c e s s a ry t o r e a c h S c he i dt ’ s r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.