alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting for the aforementioned 
committee:
    Time and Date: 8 a.m.--5:30 p.m., September 25, 2008.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn, 7830 S. Las Vegas Boulevard, Las Vegas, 
Nevada 89123, telephone (702) 453-7830, fax (702) 453-7850.
    Status: Open to public, limited only by the space available. The 
meeting room accommodates approximately 50 people.
    Purpose: This committee is charged with providing advice to the 
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services; the Director, CDC; 
and the Director, NIOSH, on priorities in mine safety and health 
research, including grants and contracts for such research, 30 U.S.C. 
812(b)(2), Section 102(b)(2).
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will focus on diesel 
monitoring and control research, communications and tracking 
developments, training research, chemical hazards in mining, and dust 
monitoring and control research. The agenda will also include an update 
from the Associate Director for Mining, NIOSH.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffery L. Kohler, PhD, Executive 
Secretary, Mine Safety and Health Research Advisory Committee, NIOSH, 
CDC, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, telephone: 
(412) 386-5301, Fax (412) 386-5300.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: August 13, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-19240 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Mrs. K. P. Jones, Jr., v. State.

No. 24557.

December 21,1949.

*89
      *Reid & Reid,*Abilene, for appellant (on appeal only).

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area, with a fine of $1,000.

The state’s attorney has filed his brief, from which we quote:

“The statement of facts fails to show that the area in which the whisky was alleged to have been sold was a dry area. There is no proof in the statement of facts, nor in any bill of exception, nor in any qualification on any bill of exception that the result of the election, which resulted in the area being voted dry, was ever published as required by law.

“In view of this state of the record, appellee thinks the conviction can not be sustained. (See Gober v. State, 147 Tex. Cr. Rep. 395, 181 S. W. 2d 279; Watson v. State, 135 Texas Crim. R. 632, 122 S. W. 2d 311; Ray v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 553, 137 S. W. 2d 1031; O’Rear v. State, 147 Tex. Cr. R. 607, 183 S. W. 2d 570).”

The recommendation is based on the record. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.
#### Emil Erber v. Adolph Oppenheimer.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:


      1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2006-12CB (the
            "Exchange Act periodic reports");

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
            information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
            covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

      5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2007


      /s/ Steve Bailey
      ---------------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Loan Administration
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-63,817]

      ( print page 48396)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on August 5, 2008, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at JHP Transport LLC, Myerstown, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC this 8th day of August 2008.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-19183 Filed 8-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
** Exhibit      32**

| (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November                14, 2007 | By:  /s/                Jeffrey J. Fessler  |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                               |  Jeffrey                J. Fessler                    |
|                                               |  President                                            |
No. 72-1274.

#### Stilson et ux. *v.*Reader’s Digest Assn., Inc., et al.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 6, 2010 |   /s/ G. Wilson Hughes |
|-------------------|-----------------------------|
|              | G. Wilson Hughes            |
|              | Chief Executive Officer     |
|              | GCI, Inc.                   |

----
224 So.2d 611

#### E. C. MELTON v. William JACKSON.

6 Div. 537.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 12, 1969.

F. Bozeman Daniel, Birmingham, for appellant.

Adams & Adams, Birmingham, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed suit at law in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Bessemer Division, to recover possession of an urban lot with improvements. The case was transferred to the Equity Division on motion of appellee, where a final decree was enrolled that fastened an equitable lien on *254the lot and improvements for repairs which appellee made. This appeal is from the final decree.

, There are only three assignments of error. Appellant, in his brief, makes no specific reference to either. The brief ■contains a statement of the case which is repetitious of the assignments of error; also a statement of facts, although none of the oral testimony taken before the trial court appears in the transcript. Under the title “Propositions of Law,” not a single case or authority is cited. Likewise, under “Argument” not a single case or authority is cited.

There appears no ruling on appellant’s demurrer to the motion to transfer the case to the equity side of the docket. In the absence of a ruling on the demurrer, this court will not review the assignment relating thereto. Cash v. Usrey, 278 Ala. 313, 178 So.2d 91(2).

Appellant’s brief is insufficient.because it makes some general, propositions, but fails to make specific application to the ruling assigned as error. The court cannot be put to a search for error not specifically assigned and argued in brief. Lee v. Belcher, 276 Ala. 384, 162 So.2d 478 (1-3) ; Schneider v. Southern Cotton Oil Company, 204 Ala. 614, 87 So. 97(1).

Appellant’s brief being inadequate ■ and failing to comport with Rule 9, Supreme Court Rules, Title 7, Recompiled Code, 1958, Appendix, the decree of the court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by B. W. Simmons, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, and was adopted by the Court as its opinion.

Affirmed.

' LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON, MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                       172,622
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                426,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  47,000
<INVENTORY>                                                   95,648
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             732,726
<PP&E>                                                     4,043,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                             1,452,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             4,118,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      1,402,385
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                  400,000
<COMMON>                                                       4,236
<OTHER-SE>                                                 1,327,724
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               4,118,664
<SALES>                                                    5,789,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           6,920,881
<CGS>                                                      6,029,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              6,029,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           1,176,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              10,789
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            76,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (285,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                (267,740)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (552,919)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (499,257)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6715

ANDREA MILLISCENT YOUNG,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-1400-2)

Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: January 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea Milliscent Young, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrea Milliscent Young seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Young’s petition is barred by the oneyear statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West 1994

& Supp. 2000). Young’s conviction became final in 1995, but she

did not file her § 2254 petition in the district court until December 1998, long after the limitations period expired. Harris v.

Hutchinson, 209 F.3d 325, 327 (4th Cir. 2000) (rejecting habeas

petitioner’s argument that limitations period did not begin until

termination of state post-conviction proceedings, and holding that

period instead commences “upon conclusion of direct review of a

judgment of conviction”); see Hernandez v. Caldwell, 225 F.3d 435,

439 (4th Cir. 2000) (establishing April 24, 1997, as the cut-off

date for petitioners to seek habeas relief from state convictions

that had become final prior to the April 24, 1996 effective date of

the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, that the undersigned, David Hadley constitutes
and appoints Yehoram Uziel and Robert E. Kassel, or either of them, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Form 10-KSB, Annual Report of Soligen Technologies,
Inc., a Wyoming Corporation, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000, and any
amendments or supplements thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the
Form 10-KSB, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission granting unto each of said
attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorney-in-fact
and agent may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

             Dated this      26th       day of June 2000
                         --------------


Signature



/s/ David Hadley
---------------------------------------------
David Hadley, Director
#### William Lawson, Respondent, v. Willard Box and Lumber Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor International,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:   May 12, 2006


By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    ---------------------------------
    Robert A. Levinson
    Chief Executive Officer

                                    Page 48
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 828 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 828

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 3, 1995

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,  That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106, 12107, 
and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for the vessel OLD HAT (United States official 
number 508299).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            10,868
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           57,662
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             59,571
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  68,530
<CASH>                                          12,962
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               8,312
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,124
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 37,138
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              9,606
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  8,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,606
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,124
<PREMIUMS>                                      45,408
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,025
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      28,062
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,689
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  28,165
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             30,137
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (4,701)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               8,860
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 7,603
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 37,138
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          1,474
        

</TABLE>