alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 826

To extend the deadline for the completion of certain land exchanges involving

the Big Thicket National Preserve in Texas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 3, 1995

Mr. WILSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To extend the deadline for the completion of certain land

exchanges involving the Big Thicket National Preserve

in Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR LAND EXCHANGE.

4 The last sentence of subsection (d) of the first section

5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the establishment

6 of the Big Thicket National Preserve in the State of

7 Texas, and for other purposes’’, approved October 11,

8 1974 (16 U.S.C. 698), is amended by striking out ‘‘two
2

•HR 826 IH

1 years after the date of enactment’’ and inserting ‘‘4 years

2 after the date of enactment’’.

Æ
EX-10.1




 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of February 17,
2020 by and among NN, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Warren A. Veltman (the “Executive”), and amends that certain Executive Employment Agreement dated as of September 9, 2014, as amended, by and among the
Company and the Executive (the “Employment Agreement”). 
 In consideration of the mutual promises, representations,
warranties, covenants and conditions set forth in this Amendment, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

1.    Section 3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting said Section 3 in its entirety and
inserting in lieu thereof the following: 
 “Position and Duties. The Executive shall serve as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company with responsibilities and authority as may from time to time be assigned by the Board of Directors of the Company. Executive agrees to perform faithfully and industriously the duties which the
Company may assign to him. The Executive shall devote substantially all of his working time and efforts to the business affairs of the Company, to the exclusion of all other employment or business interest other than passive personal investments,
charitable, religious or civic activities. Executive may not engage, directly or indirectly, in any other business or businesses, whether or not similar to that of the Company, except with the consent of the Board of Directors of the Company.”

 2.    In all other respects, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

3.    This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed an original, but all
of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Any or all of the signatures to this Amendment may be by facsimile transmission. 

4.    This Amendment shall be governed in accordance with the laws of the State of Tennessee, without regard to principles
of conflict of laws. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement as of the date first
above written. 
  

			
	NN, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Matthew S. Heiter

	Name:	 	Matthew S. Heiter
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President
	
	 /s/ Warren A. Veltman

	Warren A. Veltman
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 632

To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the United

States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mr. FROST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used

by the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JUST COMPENSATION.

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Section 1498(a) of title 28,

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end of

6 the first paragraph the following: ‘‘Reasonable and entire

7 compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs,

8 including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attor9 neys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent

10 inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had
2

•HR 632 IH

1 no more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-

2 year period preceding the use or manufacture of the pat3 ented invention by or for the United States.’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to actions under section 1498(a)

6 of title 28, United States Code, that are pending on, or

7 brought on or after, January 1, 1995.

Æ
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Duncan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 7, 2003                /s/
                                       Ronald A. Duncan
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       GCI, Inc.


                                       1
<PAGE>
          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Lowber, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



Date:  November 7, 2003                /s/
                                       John M. Lowber
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       GCI, Inc.


                                       2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 862 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 862

     To prohibit the use of Federal funds to promote homosexuality.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 1995

 Mr. Dornan (for himself, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. 
  Burton of Indiana, and Mr. Manzullo) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the use of Federal funds to promote homosexuality.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO PROMOTE 
              HOMOSEXUALITY.

    No Federal funds may be used directly or indirectly to promote, 
condone, accept, or celebrate homosexuality, lesbianism, or 
bisexuality.
                                 <all>
```
(No. 23650.

#### The Joseph Triner Corporation, Appellee, *vs.*E. R. Oransky, Appellant.

*Opinion filed December 10, 1936.*

Rosenberg, Toomin & Stein, (Benjamin Rosenberg, of counsel,) for appellant.

Moses, Kennedy, Stein & Bachrach, (Warter Bachrach, Stanley Morris, and R. Weyand, of counsel,) for appellee.

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the court:

The circuit court of Cook county entered a decree permanently enjoining appellant from directly or indirectly advertising certain brands of whisky at a price below the standard and uniform price of those brands. The cause was tried on a stipulation of facts.

Errors assigned are, that the Eair Trade act of Illinois is in contravention of section 2 of article 2 of the constitution of this State and the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States; that it violates section 22 of aricle 4 of the constitution of this State and is in violation of the trust laws, also that re-sale price maintenance contracts are unlawful. All of these assignments were urged and passed upon contrary to the contention of appellant here in *Triner Corp.*v. *McNeil,*363 Ill. 559. The holdings in that case settle the issues here.

The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of Ashraf M. Dahod and Paul J. Milbury
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively of Starent Networks, Corp. (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                       
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    ASHRAF M. DAHOD                                                
|                     |  |     |  | Ashraf M. Dahod President and Chief Executive Officer                 
|                     |  |    
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    PAUL J. MILBURY                                                
|                     |  |     |  | Paul J. Milbury Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

Certification
of Chief Executive Officer underSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I
hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of OSullivan Industries Holdings, Inc.
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of OSullivan Industries Holdings, Inc.

|Date:   August 29, 2003 |  |  | /s/ Phillip J. Pacey     
|----------------------- |  |  | -------------------------
|                        |  |  |                          
|                        |  |  | Phillip J. Pacey         
|                        |  |  | Senior Vice President and
|                        |  |  | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OSullivan Industries Holdings, Inc.
and will be retained by OSullivan Industries Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000984 21-AUG-2017 08:27 AM
234 So.2d *47*

#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. MacDonald GALLION, Attorney General, etc. v. Honorable Richard P. EMMET, as Judge of the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit of Alabama, in Equity.

3 Div. 280.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 9, 1970.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., Leslie Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Joseph S. Mead, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Clement, Rosen, Hubbard & Waldrop, Tuscaloosa and Wright *&*Long, Montgomery, for respondent.

PETITION FOR ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDAMUS

COLEMAN, Justice.

The State of Alabama filed its petition praying for mandamus to be issued by this court to require the respondent herein, the Honorable Richard P. Emmet, as Judge of the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, In Equity, to vacate an order issued by him on January 25, 1967, in Case Number 36578 in said court.

By the order of January 25, 1967, the respondent ordered that execution upon the decree rendered in said cause on January 11, 1967, be stayed pending disposition of the appeal taken in said cause to review the-*512decree rendered January 11, 1967. This •court issued the rule nisi as prayed, and the respondent duly made return thereto.

On April 2, 1970, this court affirmed the decree of January 11, 1967. Malone et al. v. State of Alabama ex rel. Gallion, Attorney General, 285 Ala. 493, 234 So.2d 32. The appeal from the decree of January 11, 1967, has now been disposed of, and, therefore, the order of January 25, 1967, by its terms, is of no further force or effect. Further consideration of the instant proceeding would grant to petitioner no relief it does not now already have, and the instant cause is now moot. For that reason, the writ of mandamus herein prayed for is •due to be and is denied.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and BLOOD-WORTH, MADDOX and McCALL, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

LBUBS 2007-02 TOWNE CENTER

ROAD LLC, 

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-13249-BC 

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

SAGINAW SH-MG, et al,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER PURSUANT TO STATUS CONFERENCE

On November 19, 2009, the Court was informed that the parties have selected an accountant

to be appointed by the Court to help narrow the issues in this case. Previously, at a telephonic status

conference held on November 18, 2009, the parties agreed to prepare a five to six page statement

of the issues to be exchanged amongst the parties, presented to the selected accountant, and

presented to the Court in preparation for an in-person status conference scheduled for November 30,

2009. The parties agreed to provide the statements by the close of business on November 25, 2009.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to provide the agreed-upon

statements to each other, the selected accountant, and the Court through the utilities function of the

CM/ECF system, by the close of business on November 25, 2009.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 20, 2009

1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Doc # 56 Filed 11/20/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2021
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 20, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Doc # 56 Filed 11/20/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2022
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Luis A. Mostacero,  Vice President Finance of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

       (a)    the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (b)    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material respect, the financial condition and result of operations
              of the Company.




                                               /s/ Luis A. Mostacero
                                               ---------------------------------
Date: March 31, 2007                           Luis A. Mostacero
                                               Vice President of Finance

























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  I, John J. Augustine, certify that:
  1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.; and
  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
   Date: May24, 2011
/s/John J. AugustineJohn J. AugustineChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit










Exhibit 4.3
DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
As of December 31, 2019, GATX Corporation has two classes of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): (1) our Common Stock and (2) our 5.625% Notes due 2066.
Description of Common Stock
The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) and our Amended and Restated By-Laws (the “By-Laws”), each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4 is a part. We encourage you to read our Certificate of Incorporation, our By-Laws and the applicable provisions of the New York Business Corporation Law for additional information.
Authorized Capital Shares
Our authorized capital shares consist of 120,000,000 shares of common stock, par value 62-1/2¢ per share (“Common Stock”), and 5,000,000 shares of series preferred stock, par value $1 per share (“Preferred Stock”). The outstanding shares of our Common Stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
Voting Rights
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the shareholders, including the election of directors. Our Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.
Dividend Rights
Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.
Liquidation Rights
Subject to any preferential rights of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock will share ratably in all assets legally available for distribution to our shareholders in the event of dissolution.
Other Rights and Preferences
Our Common Stock has no sinking fund or redemption provisions or preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. Holders of Common Stock may act by unanimous written consent.
Listing
The Common Stock is listed on The New York Stock Exchange and NYSE Chicago under the trading symbol GATX
Description of Notes
A complete description of the 5.625% Notes due 2066 issued by GATX Corporation is contained under the caption “Description of Debt Securities” in the Prospectus dated August 16, 2013 (the “Base Prospectus”) and under the caption “Description of Notes” in the Prospectus Supplement dated May 9, 2016 to the Base Prospectus, forming a part of the Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333-190682) of GATX Corporation, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
#### Marion-Lima Transit Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Pennsylvania-Ohio Coach Line Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(Nos. 23278 and 23279

Decided April 20, 1932.)

*218
      *Mr. Beecher W. Waltermire,*for the Marion-Lima Transit Company, the Buckeye Stages, Inc., and the Galion-Mansfield Transit Company.

*Mr. R. H. Nesbitt,*for the Pennsylvania-Ohio Coach Line Company.

*Mr. Aaron Hálloran*and *Mr. R. A. Lindemann,*for the Nevin Bus Lines, Inc.

*Mr. John L. Cable,*for receivers of the Ft. Wayne-Lima Bailroad Company.

*Messrs. Henderson, Burr, Randall $ Porter, Mr. H. Z. Maxwell*and *Mr. A. M. Donnan,*for the Pennsylvania General Transit Company.

*Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, and *Mr. T. J. Herbert,*for the Public Utilities Commission.

By the Court.

The foregoing order of the commission, granting the application, conditioned and restricted as above indicated, is based upon the decision of this court in the case of *Pennsylvania Rd. Co.*v. *Public Utilities Commission,*123 Ohio St., 655, 176 N. E., 573, and a majority of this court are of opinion that that case is controlling in the instant case. The principles declared in that case are applicable to the facts disclosed by the present record. In that case an intrastate certificate was sought over a route across the state already served by various operators along sepa*219rate portions of the route. These operators were protestants, contending that no public necessity or convenience required the through intrastate operation and that the public was being adequately served by existing transportation lines in the territory severally occupied by the protestants.

This court affirmed the commission in granting the through intrastate certificate; and, while the further question involved in that case was as to which of two applicants for the through intrastate certificate the same should be granted, with such question we are not concerned in the present cases. Our conclusion is, upon the authority of that case, that the findings and orders of the commission in these two cases should be, and are, hereby affirmed.

*Orders affirmed.*

Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
#### Thomas Carter, Respondent, v. William Johnson, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.