alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19098]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Washington University

Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific 
Instruments

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L.106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW, 
Washington, D.C.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument described 
below, for such purposes as the instrument is intended to be used, that 
was being manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
Docket Number: 08-018. Applicant: Washington University, St. Louis, MO 
63130. Instrument: Modular Hot Cell - COMECER Model MIP1-1P-1350. 
Manufacturer: COMECER, Italy. Intended Use: See notice at 73 FR 30377, 
May 27, 2008. Reasons: The instrument has a sealed system for isotope 
work which is separated from the shielded door, which allows for the 
opening of the door for training purposes without compromising the work 
area air quality. The separate shield and door design also insures that 
the door is not contaminated, and thus, the user can open the door to 
survey the hot cell for radioactivity without the risk of contamination 
to the user and trainees. This safety feature is specific to this 
instrument and not available from other U.S. manufacturers.

    Dated: August 12, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director.
Statutory Import Programs Staff Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-19098 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT (15)


                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP







To CMS Energy Corporation:

We are aware that CMS Energy Corporation has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements No. 33-47629, No. 33-60007, No. 33-61595, No. 333-60795,
No. 33-62573, No. 333-32229, No. 333-63229, No. 333-68937 and No. 333-76347 its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999, which includes our report dated
August 12, 1999 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained
therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that report is
not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our
firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


                                                             Arthur Andersen LLP



Detroit, Michigan,
     August 12, 1999.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4340 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4340

 To prohibit, in connection with the termination of Army activities at 
 the Stratford Army Engine Plant, the expenditure of Federal funds to 
 cover the costs of relocating a Government contractor located at that 
                             installation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 1996

 Ms. DeLauro introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit, in connection with the termination of Army activities at 
 the Stratford Army Engine Plant, the expenditure of Federal funds to 
 cover the costs of relocating a Government contractor located at that 
                             installation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PAYMENT OF RELOCATION COSTS FOR GOVERNMENT 
              CONTRACTOR, STRATFORD ARMY ENGINE PLANT.

    In connection with the termination of Army activities at the 
Stratford Army Engine Plant, Stratford, Connecticut, pursuant to the 
Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX 
of Public Law 101-510), none of the funds available to the Department 
of Defense may be used to relocate, to pay the costs of relocating, or 
to make payments under any contract relating to the relocation of, any 
Government contractor located at that installation.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 737 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 737

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 treatment of tenant-stockholders in cooperative housing corporations 
also shall apply to stockholders of corporations that only own the land 
                  on which the residences are located.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 1995

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the 
 treatment of tenant-stockholders in cooperative housing corporations 
also shall apply to stockholders of corporations that only own the land 
                  on which the residences are located.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RULES APPLICABLE TO TENANT-STOCKHOLDERS OF 
              COOPERATIVE HOUSING CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 216 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Cooperative housing corporations owning or leasing 
        only land.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `cooperative housing 
                corporation' includes any corporation which would be a 
                cooperative housing corporation if `or situated on land 
                owned or leased by the corporation' were inserted 
                before the comma at the end of paragraph (1)(B).
                    ``(B) Determination of whether stock is fully paid-
                up.--In the case of a corporation which would not be a 
                cooperative housing corporation but for subparagraph 
                (A), the determination under paragraph (2) of whether 
                the stock of any stockholder who owns a house situated 
                on land owned or leased by the corporation is fully 
                paid-up shall be based on the portion of the value of 
                the corporation's equity in the land on which the 
                houses are situated which is attributable to the land 
                on which such stockholder's house is situated.
                    ``(C) Trailer parks excluded.--This paragraph shall 
                not apply if any house situated on land owned or leased 
                by the corporation is a mobile home.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1987.
                                 <all>
```
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6026 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

prohibit the introduction or delivery for introduction into 

interstate commerce of food packaging containing intentionally added PFAS, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Food Containers 

5 Safe from PFAS Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6026 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST FOOD PACKAGING CON2 TAINING INTENTIONALLY ADDED PFAS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 301 of the Federal Food, 

4 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by 

5 adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(fff)(1) The introduction or delivery for introduction 

7 into interstate commerce of food packaging containing in8 tentionally added PFAS. 

9 ‘‘(2) The term ‘PFAS’ means a perfluoroalkyl sub10 stance or a polyfluoroalkyl substance that is man-made 

11 with at least 1 fully fluorinated carbon atom.’’. 

12 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub13 section (a) applies beginning on January 1, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)*





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, James C. Dyer, Chief Executive Officer of Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C., and Alex G. Stallings, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C., certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/ James C. Dyer, IV


James C. Dyer, IV


Chief Executive Officer of


Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,


general partner of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P.





May 10, 2011








/s/ Alex G. Stallings


Alex G. Stallings


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of


Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,


general partner of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P.





May 10, 2011

















*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.49
NVR, Inc.
Summary of the 2020 Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
The following is a description of NVR, Inc.’s (“NVR” or the “Company”) 2020 annual incentive compensation plan (the “Bonus Plan”). The Bonus Plan is not set forth in a formal written document, and therefore NVR is providing this description of the plan pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iii) of Regulation S-K. All of NVR’s executive officers; Paul C. Saville (President and Chief Executive Officer of NVR), Jeffrey D. Martchek (President of Homebuilding Operations), Paul W. Praylo, (Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of NVR), Daniel D. Malzahn (Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of NVR), Eugene J. Bredow (President of NVR Mortgage Finance, Inc.), participate in the Bonus Plan.
Under the Bonus Plan, the executive officers’ bonus opportunity is limited to 100% of their base salary. The executive officers’ annual bonus opportunity will be based 80% upon the Company’s consolidated pre-tax profit (before consolidated annual bonus and stock-based compensation expense but after all other charges) and 20% based on the number of new orders, net of cancellations (“New Orders”) compared to the consolidated pre-tax profit and New Orders within the Company’s 2020 annual business plan. The executive officers begin to earn the consolidated pre-tax profit portion of their annual bonus award once the annual business plan is at least 80% attained. The full amount of the consolidated pre-tax profit portion of their annual bonus award is earned ratably from 80% up to 100% achievement of the annual business plan. The executive officers begin to earn the New Orders portion of their annual bonus award once the annual business plan is at least 85% attained. The full amount of the New Orders portion of their annual bonus award is earned ratably from 85% up to 100% achievement of the annual business plan.
#### RESCUE AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HCHD/BEN TAUB HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-20254

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 7, 2003.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Andre Howard, proceeding *pro se*under the name “Rescue America,” appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment on his Equal Pay Act1 claim to defendant Harris County Hospital DistrictyBen Taub Hospital. Applying *de novo*review, we find that, in response to the defendant’s summary judgment motion, Howard did not produce evidence substantiating his pay Act claim against the defendant, or his related claims for retaliation and breach of hospital policy.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(l)(l).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
        INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTH
        PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
        BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
        REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075679
<NAME>                        GCI, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         10,557
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,156
<INVENTORY>                                    3,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               68,655
<PP&E>                                         470,402
<DEPRECIATION>                                 119,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 679,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,566
<BONDS>                                        387,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       234,312
<OTHER-SE>                                     (24,005)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   679,260
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               68,277
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               36,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,962)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,464)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,498)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (54,980)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (54,980)


</TABLE>
Order entered September 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01628-CR

JOSE CUTBERTO VALLE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-61804-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On August 21, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to 

pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is indigent and represented by court-appointed counsel Kathleen 

Walsh; (3) Ms. Walsh’s explanation for the delay in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and 

(4) Ms. Walsh requested thirty days from the September 10, 2013 hearing to file appellant’s 

brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by OCTOBER 10, 2013. We note that appellant 

has already been granted one thirty-day extension of time to file his brief and the brief is now 

nearly three months overdue. Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted. If appellant’s 
brief is not filed by the date specified, we will order Kathleen Walsh and the Dallas County 

Public Defender’s Office removed as counsel and will order the trial court to appoint new 

counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Dominique Collins, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 4; Katherine Drew, 

Appellate-Chief, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; Kathleen Walsh, Dallas County Public 

Defender’s Office; and to the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### John C. Hagar, Appellant, *v.*Richard Phillips, Appellee.

APPEAL PROM MORGAN.

The appellant files the record, and enters a motion that the appellee join in error. The appeal was prayed within thirty days of the commencement of this term.

M. McConnel, for the motion.

W. Brown & D. A. Smith, *contra.*

Per Curiam.

The motion is refused. The appellant was not bound to file the record before the next term, and the appellee ought not to be compelled to appear before that time. The rights of the parties should be reciprocal.

*Motion denied.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 740 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 740

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 740

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

    Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28, United States 
Code, and section 12 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or 
any other law which would interpose or support a defense of 
untimeliness, jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the United States 
Court of Federal Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment on any 
claim by Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico against the United 
States with respect to any lands or interests therein the State of New 
Mexico or any adjoining State held by aboriginal title or otherwise 
which were acquired from the tribe without payment of adequate 
compensation by the United States. As a matter of adequate 
compensation, the United States Claims Court may award interest at a 
rate of five percent per year to accrue from the date on which such 
lands or interests therein were acquired from the tribe by the United 
States. Such jurisdiction is conferred only with respect to claims 
accruing on or before August 13, 1946, and all such claims must be 
filed within three years after the date of enactment of this Act. Such 
jurisdiction is conferred notwithstanding any failure of the tribe to 
exhaust any available administrative remedy.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

    Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the Pueblo of Isleta 
Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act under any judgment of the Indian Claims 
Commission or any other authority with respect to any lands that are 
the subject of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall not 
be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such claim, and shall 
not otherwise affect the entitlement to, or amount of, any relief with 
respect to such claim.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.18
Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement


This Amendment No. [ ] (this “Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement by and between E*TRADE Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and [ ] (“Executive”), dated as of [ ] (as may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”), is made and entered into by and between the Company and Executive, effective as of [[ ], 20[ ]]. Any capitalized term that is used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Employment Agreement.


In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:


1.Section 5(b)(i) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the reference to “two times” in the first line thereof with “two point ninety-nine (2.99) times”.


2.Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof as in effect immediately prior to the date hereof.


3.This Amendment may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and which together shall constitute one instrument.


[Signature Page Follows]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.




E*TRADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION


    
__________________________________
 By:
          








__________________________________
 By: