alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

               ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES INC.
             COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
           for the three months and nine months ended
                   September 30, 1996 and 1995
              (in thousands, except per share data)
                           (unaudited)
                           Exhibit 11

                            Three Months          Nine Months
                         ------------------   -----------------   
                          1996       1995     1996      1995
                         --------   -------   -------   ------- 
<S>                      <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
PRIMARY INCOME (LOSS)
  PER SHARE:
Net income (loss)        $17,318    $(5,961)  $24,821    $(1,479)
                         =======    =======   =======    =======

Weighted average number
  of shares outstanding   14,963     14,861    14,919     14,857

Adjustment for stock
  options                    225       --         172         91
                         -------    -------   -------    -------

Adjusted weighted 
  average number of 
  shares outstanding      15,188     14,861    15,091     14,948
                         =======    =======   =======    =======

Primary income (loss)
  per share              $  1.14    $ (.40)   $  1.64    $ (.10)
                         =======    =======   =======    =======

FULLY DILUTED INCOME
  (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Net income (loss)        $17,318    $(5,961)  $24,821    $(1,479)
                         =======    =======   =======    =======

Weighted average number
  of shares outstanding   15,203     15,101    15,159     15,097

Adjustment for stock 
  options                    291       --         249       --
                         -------    -------   -------    -------

Adjusted weighted 
  average number of
  shares outstanding      15,494     15,101    15,408     15,097
                         =======    =======   =======    =======

Fully diluted income
  (loss) per share       $  1.12    $ (.40)   $  1.61    $ (.10)
                         =======    =======   =======    =======
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIS STANFIELD, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 09-20300

 10-10750

Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent. 

 /

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Scheer’s Report and

Recommendation [dkt 24], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny

Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence [dkt 18]. Neither party has filed an

objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time period in which to do so has elapsed. 

The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file and the Report and Recommendation. As

a result of that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the

findings and conclusions of this Court.

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or

correct sentence [dkt 18] is DENIED.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 2, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of record

by electronic or U.S. mail on August 2, 2010.

S/Marie E. Verlinde 

Case Manager

(810) 984-3290
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Transit Administration 

          - 49 CFR Part 604 
          - [Docket No. FTA-2005-22657] 
          - RIN 2132-AA85 

# AGENCY:

Federal Transit Administration, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Correcting amendments. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Transit Administration published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 1, 2008, revising the appendices to the final rule and responding to petitions for reconsideration. That document inadvertently failed to update the table in Appendix D, which should have appeared in the rule as a matrix.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 11, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Crystal Frederick, Ombudsman for Charter Services, Federal Transit Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Room E54-410, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-4063 or                         *ombudsman.charterservice@dot.gov*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a second correction to the final rule published on January 14, 2008 (73 FR 2326). The first correction was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 1, 2008 (73 FR 44927).                 

# List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 604

      - Charter Service

Accordingly, 49 CFR part 604 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: 

1. The authority citation for part 604 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:49 U.S.C. 5323(d); § 3023(d), Public Law 109-59;  49 CFR 1.51. 

2. Revise the table in appendix D to part 604 to read as follows: 

# Appendix D to Part 604—Table of Potential Remedies 

Remedy Assessment Matrix: 

* * * * *

Issued this 5th day of August 2008. 

Severn E.S. Miller, 

Chief Counsel.

 [FR Doc. E8-18444 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-57-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORANGE AND ROCKLAND
UTILITIES, INC FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCES TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      944,944
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     10,438
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         199,678
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       137,851
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   1,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,294,263
<COMMON>                                        67,598
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      126,272
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            188,140
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 382,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           356,637
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 132,975
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       39
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       43,360
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,517
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   179
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 377,546
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,294,263
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      476,748
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            21,490
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     394,162
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     415,652
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         61,096
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 734
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  61,830
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        24,501
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,329
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,260
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   35,069
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        26,178
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       17,918
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          65,762
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
August 20, 1997

Albert L. Barbara, Vice Chairman
Win Capital Corp.
80 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004

Dear Mr. Barbara:

Tom Motter just returned from Las Vegas where he met with Steven
Bayern and Pat Koelnick to discuss the details regarding an
investment banking relationship.  Based upon their discussions an
agreement was reached whereby both parties agreed as follows:

   1)   Paradigm Medical Industries, Inc. ("PMED") hereby
retains Win Capital Corp. ("WIN") to act as its investment
bankers for two (2) year period which would be extended an
additional year unless either party notified the other party in
writing thirty days before the expiration of the two year
contract of their desire to terminate the contractual
relationship.

   2)   PMED will pay a monthly retainer to WIN of $2,000 for
the first six months, #4,000 for the second six months and $6,000
per month for the remainder of the contract.

   3)   PMED will issue a warrant to WIN to purchase up to
200,000 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share but not in
excess of 4.9% of the current number of common shares outstanding
plus common shares to be issued upon the conversion of both the
Class A and Class B Preferred Stock issues.  In all other
respects, the terms of the warrant will be identical to the Class
A warrant issued in connection with PMED's public offering in
July, 1996.

   The aforementioned terms were submitted to the Paradigm
Board of Directors and was unanimously approved and resolved to
authorize the officers of the company to finalize the agreement.

   Please indicate your concurrence by signing below and
returning a signed copy of this agreement by facsimile.  Upon
receipt of your acceptance we will immediately forward our
initial month's payment.

Thank you for your assistance.  We look forward to a long and
fruitful relationship with WIN.

                              Very truly yours,

                              Michael W. Stelzer
                              CEO & President

                              Thomas F. Motter
                              Chairman of the Board

Agreed to and accepted by:

Albert L. Barbara                   Date:
Vice Chairman
Win Capital Corp.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10806

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CY VIATOR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-44-24

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cy Viator has moved for leave to 

withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 

738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Viator

has filed responses. 

We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Viator’s responses. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 16, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10806 Document: 00514960832 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/16/2019
No. 17-10806

2

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-10806 Document: 00514960832 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/16/2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          29,053
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    903,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,306
<PP&E>                                       2,631,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 778,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,882,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          578,157
<BONDS>                                          9,465
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       353,406
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,941,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,882,543
<SALES>                                      2,201,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,201,867
<CGS>                                          149,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,089,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,954
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (100,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (101,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (101,351)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
Edwin Martin and Esther Martin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00868

- CV

FORT DUNCAN MEDICAL CENTER INC.,

Appellant

v.

Edwin MARTIN and Esther Martin, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Robert Martin, Appellee s

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 12

- 26093

- MCVAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal. Appellee s ’ brief was originally due on March 13, 2014.

On March 12 , 2014, appellee s requested an extension of time in which to file a brief, stating the parties had informally reached a settlement. This court granted the extension until April 14,
2014. Neither the brief nor a second motion for an extension of time has been filed.

On April 15, 2014, the clerk of this court contacted appellee s and was informed that the parties were in the process of finalizing the settlement documents and would be filing a motion

to dismiss. A motion to dismiss has not been filed.

Appellee s are repre sented on appeal by Mr. Manuel C. Maltos. Mr. Maltos is hereby ORDERED to file, no later than May 19, 2014 , a joint motion to dismiss or a motion for
extension of t ime in which to file appellees’ brief. If Mr. Maltos files a motion for extension of

time based upon the settlemen t neg otiation, he must state in detail the status of the settlement negoti ati on and provide a date by which a motion to dismiss will be filed. If Mr. Maltos does not respond by May 19, 2014, this appeal will be set at issue without benefit of an appellees’ brief.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
      OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Mondo Acquisition III, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
      A. Rose, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934; and




(2)The
      information contained
      in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
                August 12, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Thomas
                A. RoseThomas
                A. Rose
              Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18847]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Connecticut, et al.; Notice of Consolidated 
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscopes

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
in Room 2104, U.S. Department of Commerce, and Constitution Avenue., 
NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 08-033. Applicant: University of Connecticut, 
Storrs, CT 06269-3136. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai 
G\2\ Spirit TWIN. Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended 
Use: See notice at 73 FR 42549, July 22, 2008.
    Docket Number: 08-034 Applicant: Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 
02115. Instrument: Electron Microscope, Model Tecnai G\2\ F20. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, The Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 
73 FR 42549, July 22, 2008.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as these instruments are intended to be used, was bing 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instruments were 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of the order of each instrument.

    Dated: August 11, 2008.
Faye Robinson,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-18847 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 71

To reduce the Official Mail Allowance of Members of the House and to

prohibit certain other mailing practices, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mr. GOSS (for himself, Mr. BLUTE, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. HORN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee House Oversight, and in

addition to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, for a

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To reduce the Official Mail Allowance of Members of the

House and to prohibit certain other mailing practices,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN OFFICIAL MAIL ALLOWANCE.

4 Section 311(e)(2)(B)(i) of the Legislative Branch Ap5 propriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(e)(2)(B)(i)) is

6 amended by striking ‘‘3 times’’ and inserting ‘‘1.5 times’’.
2

HR 71 IH

1 SEC. 2. BAN ON TRANSFER FROM OFFICIAL EXPENSES AL2 LOWANCE AND CLERK HIRE ALLOWANCE TO

3 OFFICIAL MAIL ALLOWANCE.

4 Section 311(e) of the Legislative Branch Appropria5 tions Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(e)) is amended by striking

6 paragraph (3).

7 SEC. 3. BAN ON UNSOLICITED MAIL AS FRANKED MAIL

8 WITHIN 60 DAYS BEFORE A MEMBER’S PRI9 MARY AND GENERAL ELECTION.

10 Section 3210(a)(6) of title 39, United States Code,

11 is amended—

12 (1) by striking ‘‘mass mailing’’ and inserting

13 ‘‘unsolicited mailing’’ each place it occurs in sub14 paragraphs (A) through (D); and

15 (2) by adding at the end the following:

16 ‘‘(G) As used in this paragraph, the term

17 ‘unsolicited mailing’ means all mail other than

18 mail that is—

19 ‘‘(i) in direct response to a commu20 nication from a person to whom the matter

21 is mailed;

22 ‘‘(ii) from a Member of Congress to

23 other Members of Congress;

24 ‘‘(iii) of a news release to the commu25 nications media; or
3

HR 71 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) in furtherance of the administra2 tive duties of the Member of Congress.’’.

3 SEC. 4. DISCLOSURE OF MEMBER’S FIRST CLASS MAILINGS

4 TO THE PUBLIC.

5 Section 311(a)(3) of the Legislative Branch Appro6 priations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 59e(a)(3)) is amended by

7 adding before the period at the end ‘‘, including (by sepa8 rate category) the costs relating to franked, first class

9 mass mailings’’.

10 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendments made by this section shall apply

12 with respect to sessions of Congress beginning after the

13 date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


The undersigned, Daniel Poludniak, is the Chief Financial Officer of AMB
Financial Corp. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company
of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
(the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
          78o(d)] and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
          Report.

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.



March 23, 2005                           /s/ Daniel Poludniak
                                         -------------------------
Date                                     Daniel Poludniak