Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices 6125 

10We divided the total dumping margins 

(calculated as the difference between NV and EP or 

CEP) for each importer by the total quantity of 

subject merchandise sold to that importer during 

the POR to calculate a per-unit assessment amount. 

We will direct CBP to assess importer-specific 

assessment rates based on the resulting per-unit 

(i.e., per-kilogram) rates by the weight in kilograms 

of each entry of the subject merchandise during the 

POR. 

preliminary results within five days of 

the date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(3)(ii), for the final results in 

an antidumping duty new shipper 

review, interested parties may submit 

publicly available information to value 

FOPs within 20 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results. 

Interested parties must provide the 

Department with supporting 

documentation for the publicly 

available information to value each 

FOP. Additionally, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.301(c)(1), for the final 

results of this new shipper review, 

interested parties may submit factual 

information to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information submitted by an 

interested party less than ten days 

before, on, or after, the applicable 

deadline for submission of such factual 

information. However, the Department 

notes that 19 CFR 351.301(c)(1) permits 

new information only insofar as it 

rebuts, clarifies, or corrects information 

recently placed on the record. 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(1) does not envision the 

submission of additional, previously 

absent-from-the-record alternative 

surrogate value information. Therefore, 

parties should take note that surrogate 

value data that are introduced as 

rebuttal to a surrogate value submission 

generally will not fall within the 

meaning and applicability of 19 CFR 

351.301(c)(1). See Glycine from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Rescission, in Part, 72 FR 58809 

(October 17, 2007) and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 2. 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs and/or written comments no later 

than 30 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

of this new shipper review. See 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(ii). Rebuttal briefs and 

rebuttals to written comments, limited 

to issues raised in such briefs or 

comments, may be filed no later than 5 

days after the deadline for submitting 

the case briefs. See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

The Department requests that interested 

parties provide an executive summary 

of each argument contained within the 

case briefs and rebuttal briefs. 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

these preliminary results. See 19 CFR 

351.310(c). Requests should contain the 

following information: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations will be limited to issues 

raised in the briefs. If we receive a 

request for a hearing, we plan to hold 

the hearing seven days after the 

deadline for submission of the rebuttal 

briefs at the U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of these new shipper 

reviews, which will include the results 

of its analysis raised in any such 

comments, within 90 days of 

publication of these preliminary results, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the final results, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries on a per-unit basis.10

calculate an assessment rate on all 

appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP 15 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of 

review. If these preliminary results are 

adopted in our final results of review, 

the Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries. Pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate 

importer-specific (or customer) per-unit 

duty assessment rates. We will instruct 

CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review if any importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this is above de minimis. 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

new shipper review for all shipments of 

subject merchandise from Anvifish 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

subject merchandise produced and 

exported by Anvifish, the cash deposit 

rate will be that established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit 

will be required); (2) for subject 

merchandise exported by Anvifish but 

not manufactured by Anvifish, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

Vietnam-wide rate (i.e., 63.88 percent); 

and (3) for subject merchandise 

manufactured by Anvifish, but exported 

by any other party, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate applicable to the 

exporter. If the cash deposit rate 

calculated in the final results is zero or 

de minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required for those specific producerexporter combinations. These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Secretary’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

determination in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 

777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(h)(i). 

Dated: January 22, 2008. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–1899 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–840] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from India; Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping DutyAdministrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) is rescinding the 

administrative reviews of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from India for 

the period February 1, 2006, through 

January 31, 2007, for 114 companies, 

based on: 1) timely withdrawals of the 

review requests; 2) confirmed 

statements of no shipments during the 

period of review (POR); 3) our inability 

to locate certain companies; and/or 4) 

duplicated names in our notice of 

initiation. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

6126 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices 

1The petitioner in this proceeding is the Ad Hoc 

Shrimp Trade Action Committee. 

2Moreover, as noted above, the petitioner and the 

LSA also withdrew their requests for an 

administrative review for an exporter named 

Kadalkanny Frozen Foods. However, on April 23, 

2007, Kadalkanny Frozen Foods informed the 

Department that it is a member of an affiliated 

group of companies (hereinafter referred to as ≥the 

Kadalkanny Group≥). On December 20, 2007, the 

Department collapsed the members of the 

Kadalkanny Group. Because there are outstanding 

requests for review for the remaining members of 

this group, we are not rescinding the review for 

Kadalkanny Frozen Foods. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 2, 2007, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from India for 

the period February 1, 2006, through 

January 31, 2007. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 72 

FR 5007 (Feb. 2, 2007). Between 

February 21, 2007, and February 28, 

2007, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(2), certain Indian producers 

and exporters requested a review of this 

antidumping duty order. In addition, on 

February 28, 2007, the petitioner≤1 and 

the Louisiana Shrimp Association (LSA) 

also requested an administrative review 

for numerous Indian exporters of subject 

merchandise in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(1). 

On March 17, 2007, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

petitioner withdrew its request for 

review for the following companies: 1) 

Amison Foods Ltd.; 2) Amison Seafoods 

Ltd.; 3) Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; 

4) Baby Marine Exports; 5) Baby Marine 

Products; 6) Cherukattu Industries 

(Marine Div.); 7) Global Sea Foods & 

Hotels Ltd.; 8) HA & R Enterprises; 9) 

InterSea Exports Corporation; 10) 

Kadalkanny Frozen Foods; 11) Lotus 

Sea Farms; 12) National Steel; 13) 

National Steel & Agro Ind.; 14) Nsil 

Exports; 15) Premier Marine Foods; 16) 

R.F. Exports; and 17) Vaibhav Sea 

Foods. 

In April 2007, the Department 

initiated an administrative review for 

313 companies and we requested that 

each provide data on the quantity and 

value of its exports of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. These companies are listed in 

the Department’s notice of initiation. 

See Notice of Initiation of 

Administrative Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Brazil, 

Ecuador, India and Thailand, 72 FR 

17100, 17102–17107 (Apr. 6, 2007) 

(Notice of Initiation). 

In addition, between April and July 

2007, the Department received 

responses to quantity and value 

questionnaires from certain companies 

that indicated that they either: 1) had no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR; or 2) 

were duplicated in the Notice of 

Initiation. 

On July 5, 2007, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the LSA 

withdrew its request for review for 17 

companies (i.e, Amison Foods Ltd.; 

Amison Seafoods Ltd.; Baby Marine 

(Eastern) Exports; Baby Marine Exports; 

Baby Marine Products; Cherukattu 

Industries (Marine Div.); Global Sea 

Foods & Hotels Ltd.; HA & R 

Enterprises; InterSea Exports 

Corporation; Kadalkanny Frozen Foods; 

Lotus Sea Farms; National Steel; 

National Steel & Agro Ind.; Nsil Exports; 

Premier Marine Foods; R.F. Exports; and 

Vaibhav Sea Foods). 

Partial Rescission of Review 

As noted above, the petitioner and the 

LSA both withdrew their requests for an 

administrative review for each of the 

following companies within the time 

limits set forth in 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1): 

Amison Foods Ltd.; Amison Seafoods 

Ltd.; Baby Marine (Eastern) Exports; 

Baby Marine Exports; Baby Marine 

Products; Cherukattu Industries (Marine 

Div.); Global Sea Foods & Hotels Ltd.; 

HA & R Enterprises; InterSea Exports 

Corporation; Lotus Sea Farms; National 

Steel; National Steel & Agro Ind.; Nsil 

Exports; Premier Marine Foods; R.F. 

Exports; and Vaibhav Sea Foods. 

Section 351.213(d)(1) of the 

Department’s regulations requires that 

the Secretary rescind an administrative 

review if a party requesting a review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation. Therefore, because all 

requests for administrative reviews were 

timely withdrawn for the companies 

listed above, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this 

review with regard to these companies.2

In addition, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(3), we are rescinding 

the review with respect to the following 

70 companies because these companies 

reported no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR: 

1) Abad Fisheries 

2) Accelerated Freeze Drying Co. 

3) Allana Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

4) Allanasons Ltd. 

5) Amalgam Foods & Beverages Limited 

6) Amulya Sea Foods 

7) Anjaneya Seafoods 

8) Baby Marine International 

9) Bhavani Seafoods 

10) Bijaya Marine Products 

11) Blue Water Foods & Exports 

12) BMR Exports 

13) Britto Exports 

14) C P Aquaculture (India) Ltd. 

15) Capithan Exporting Co 

16) Chemmeens (Regd.) 

17) Coastal Corporation Ltd. 

18) Cochin Frozen Food Exports Pvt. 

Ltd. 

19) Corlim Marine Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

20) Esmario Export Enterprises 

21) Forstar Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

22) Frigerio Conserva Allana Limited 

23) Frontline Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

24) G A Randerian Ltd. 

25) GKS Business Associates Pvt. Ltd. 

26) Geo Aquatic Products (P) Ltd. 

27) Geo Seafoods 

28) Grandtrust Overseas (P) Ltd. 

29) HIC AFB Special Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

30) Hiravata Ice & Cold Storage 

31) Hiravati Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

32) Hiravati International P. Ltd. 

33) Indian Aquatic Products 

34) Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam 

Foods Ltd. 

35) International Freezefish Exports 

36) Interseas 

37) Jagadeesh Marine Exports 

38) Jinny Marine Traders 

39) K R M Marine Exports Ltd. 

40) Kalyanee Marine 

41) Kay Kay Exports 

42) Koluthara Exports Ltd. 

43) L.G. Seafoods 

44) Lewis Natural Foods Ltd. 

45) Libran Cold Storages (P) Ltd. 

46) M.S.C. Marine Exporters 

47) Malnad Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

48) Meenaxi Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. 

49) Naga Hanuman Fish Packers 

50) Naik Seafoods Ltd. 

51) Pijikay International Exports P Ltd. 

52) Pisces Seafood International 

53) Raunaq Ice & Cold Storage 

54) Raysons Aquatics Pvt. Ltd. 

55) RBT Exports 

56) Rohi Marine Private Ltd. 

57) S Chanchala Combines 

58) SSF Ltd. 

59) Sagar Foods 

60) Sagarvihar Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. 

61) Sanchita Marine Products P Ltd. 

62) Sawant Food Products 

63) Silver Seafood 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices 6127 

3See the July 19, 2007, Memorandum from James 

Maeder to Stephen J. Claeys entitled, ‘‘2006-2007 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: 

Selection of Respondents for Individual Review’’ at 

Attachment 6. 

4We are rescinding our review with respect to 

Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam Foods Limited 

because the company had no shipments during the 

POR. See page 5, above. 

5We are rescinding our review with respect to 

M.S.C. Marine Exporters because the company had 

no shipments during the POR. See page 5, above. 

64) Sita Marine Exports 

65) Sri Satya Marine Exports 

66) Sri Venkata Padmavathi Marine 

Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

67) Sterling Foods 

68) TBR Exports Pvt Ltd. 

69) Teekay Maine P. Ltd. 

70) Victoria Marine & Agro Exports Ltd. 

We reviewed U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) data and 

confirmed that there were no entries of 

subject merchandise from any of these 

companies. Consequently, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) 

and consistent with our practice, we are 

rescinding our review for the companies 

listed above. See, e.g., Certain Steel 

Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; 

Final Results and Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review in Part, 71 FR 65082, 65083 

(Nov. 7, 2006) (Rebar from Turkey). See 

also Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From India; Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 71 FR 41419 (July 21, 2006). 

Further, with respect to the following 

companies, the Department either: 1) 

was unable to locate accurate addresses 

for them, and thus was unable to serve 

them with any information requests in 

this case; or 2) determined based on 

information on the record that the noted 

company names do not, or no longer, 

exist3: 1) AMI Food Products; 2) Atta 

Export; 3) Brilliant Exports; 4) 

Castlerock Seafoods Ltd; 5) Coastal 

Trawlers Ltd.; 6) Hanjar Ice and Cold 

Storage; 7) Haripriya Marine Food 

Exports; 8) I Ahamed & Company; 9) 

KNR Marine Exports; 10) KRM Group; 

11) Nezami Rekha Sea Food; 12) Pronto 

Foods Pvt. Ltd.; 13) RVR Marine 

Products; 14) Royal Cold Storage (India) 

Pvt. Ltd; 15) S B Agro (India) Ltd.; 16) 

Saanthi Seafoods Ltd.; 17) Sharon 

Exports; 18) Sheimar Seafoods Ltd.; 19) 

Sree Vaialakshrm Exports; 20) Swarna 

Seafoods Ltd.; and 21) Wisdom Marine 

Exports. See the June 1, 2007, 

Memorandum to the File from Elizabeth 

Eastwood entitled, ‘‘2006–2007 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater 

Shrimp from Brazil, India, and 

Thailand: Information Regarding 

Incorrect Addresses.’’ See also the June 

4, 2007, Memorandum to the File from 

Elizabeth Eastwood entitled, ‘‘Revisions 

to June 1, 2007, Memorandum 

Regarding Incorrect Addresses in the 

2006–2007 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India.’’

Subsequently, we contacted the 

petitioner and the LSA and requested 

that they provide alternate addresses for 

these companies. For the companies 

noted above, we note that neither the 

petitioner nor the LSA was able to 

provide alternate addresses or, if they 

did provide additional address 

information, the new addresses 

continued to be ‘‘undeliverable.’’

Consequently, in accordance with our 

practice, we are also rescinding our 

review with respect to these companies. 

See Rebar from Turkey, 71 FR at 65083. 

The Department has also received 

information that the following company 

names are duplicate names: 1) 

Innovative Foods Limited/Amalgam 

Foods Limited; 2) K.V. Marine Exports; 

3) M.S.C. Marine Exporters; 4) Sprint 

Exports; and 5) Universal Cold Storage 

Ltd. These names are either: 1) partial 

versions of names of other companies 

for which we initiated an administrative 

review (i.e., Sprint Exports Pvt. Ltd. and 

Universal Cold Storage Private Limited); 

or 2) companies for which we initiated 

multiple administrative reviews because 

the petitioner, the LSA, and/or the 

respondent listed separate addresses for 

these companies in their review 

requests (i.e., Innovative Foods Limited/ 

Amalgam Foods Limited4; M.S.C. 

Marine Exporters5; and K.V. Marine 

Exports). Therefore, we are also 

rescinding the review with respect to 

these duplicate company names/ 

addresses. 

Finally, the Department received no–

shipment responses from the following 

companies for which there appeared to 

be U.S. customs entries of subject 

merchandise: 1) Ayshwarya Seafood 

Private Limited; and 2) Triveni Fisheries 

(P) Ltd. We requested data on the 

relevant entries from CBP and 

determined that the entries were not 

reportable transactions because they 

were reported by another company in its 

quantity and value questionnaire. Under 

these circumstances, we determine that 

these companies satisfy the requirement 

under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3) not to have 

‘‘entries, exports, or sales of the subject 

merchandise,’’ and, consistent with the 

Department’s practice, we are 

rescinding the review with respect to 

these companies. See, e.g., Certain Steel 

Concrete Reinforcing Bars From Turkey; 

Final Results, Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review in Part, and Determination to 

Revoke in Part, 70 FR 67665, 67666 

(Nov. 8, 2005). 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: January 25, 2008. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E8–1895 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–848] 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Extension of Time Limit for the Final 

Results of the 2005–2006 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and 2005–

2006 New Shipper Reviews 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melissa Blackledge or Jeff Pedersen, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 4, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–3518 and (202) 

482–2769, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 30, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

a notice of initiation of four new shipper 

reviews of the antidumping duty order 

on freshwater crawfish tail meat from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). 

See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews, 71 FR 63284 (October 

30, 2006). On October 31, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on freshwater 

crawfish tail meat from the PRC. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews, 71 FR 63752 (October 31, 

2006). On March 23, 2007, the 

Department aligned the time limits in 

the new shipper reviews with the time 

limits in the administrative review. See 

Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES