alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18792]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 158 / Thursday, August 14, 2008 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 47523]]



DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 892

[Docket No. FDA-2005-N-0346] (formerly 2005N-0467)


Medical Devices; Radiology Devices; Reclassification of Bone 
Sonometers

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of July 17, 2008 (73 FR 
40967). The final rule reclassified bone sonometer devices from class 
III into class II, subject to special controls. The document contained 
an inadvertent error regarding the impact of the final rule on small 
businesses. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Cassis, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-215), Food and Drug Administration, 1350 
Piccard Dr., Rockville, MD 20850, 240-276-2342.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. E8-16354, appearing on page 40969 
in the Federal Register of Thursday, July 17, 2008, there was an error 
regarding the impact of the final rule on small businesses. 
Specifically, language certifying that the final rule meets the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) was 
inadvertently omitted during document preparation. Accordingly, the 
following correction is made:
    1. On page 40969, in the middle column, under section ``VI. 
Analysis of Impacts,'' in the second full paragraph, the third sentence 
is revised to read: ``The agency certifies that the final rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.''

    Dated: August 8, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-18792 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Exhibit 21
  SUBSIDIARIES
    OF GARDNER DENVER, INC.
    JURISDICTION OFLEGAL NAME

INCORPORATIONCompAir (Australasia) Ltd.

AustraliaGardner Denver Industries Australia Pty Ltd.

AustraliaGardner Denver Nash Australia Pty Ltd.

AustraliaCompAir GmbH

AustriaGardner Denver Austria GmbH

AustriaGardner Denver Belgium NV

BelgiumBelliss & Morcom Brasil Ltda.

BrasilGardner Denver Brasil Comercio Ltda.

BrasilGardner Denver Nash Brasil Industria e Comercio de Bombas
    Ltda.

BrasilCompAir Canada Inc.

CanadaEmco Wheaton Corp.

CanadaCompAir International Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Machinery (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Nash Machinery Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Thomas Pneumatic Systems (Wuxi) Co. Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

ChinaShanghai CompAir Compressors Co. Ltd.*

ChinaShanghai CompAir-Dalong High Pressure Equipment Co. Ltd.*

ChinaGardner Denver CZ + SK s.r.o.

Czech RepublicGardner Denver Denmark A/S

DenmarkGardner Denver Oy

FinlandGardner Denver France SAS

FranceGardner Denver Industries SA

FranceEmco Wheaton GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Deutschland GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Holdings GmbH & Co. KG

GermanyGardner Denver Schopfheim GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Thomas GmbH

GermanyTIWR Holdings GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Hong Kong Limited

Hong KongGardner Denver Italy S.r.l.

ItalyGardner Denver S.r.l.

ItalyGardner Denver Japan Ltd.

JapanGardner Denver Nederland B.V.

NetherlandsGardner Denver New Zealand Ltd.

New ZealandCompAir Polska Sp. z.o.o.

PolandGardner Denver Polska Sp. z.o.o.

PolandCompAir South East Europe d.o.o.

SerbiaCompAir Far East PTE Ltd.

SingaporeGardner Denver Nash Singapore Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeGardner Denver Slovakia s.r.o.

SlovakiaCompAir South Africa (Pty) Ltd.

South AfricaCompAir Kointec Ltd.

South KoreaCompAir Korea Ltd.

South KoreaGardner Denver Korea Ltd.

South KoreaCompAir Iberia SL

Spain




---



##### 



JURISDICTION OFLEGAL NAME

INCORPORATIONGardner Denver Iberica, S.L

SpainGardner Denver Sweden AB

SwedenTodo AB

SwedenAeberhardt AG

SwitzerlandGardner Denver Schweiz AG

SwitzerlandGardner Denver Taiwan Ltd.

TaiwanCompAir Southern California Inc.

U.S. - CaliforniaBest Aire LLC

U.S. - DelawareGardner Denver International, Inc.

U.S. - DelawareGardner Denver Nash LLC

U.S. - DelawareGardner Denver Oberdorfer Pumps, Inc.

U.S. - DelawareGardner Denver Thomas, Inc.

U.S. - DelawareThomas Industries Inc.

U.S. - DelawareAir-Relief, Inc.

U.S. - KentuckyTCM Investments, Inc. (dba Gardner Denver Petroleum Pumps)

U.S. - OklahomaEmco Wheaton USA, Inc.

U.S. - TexasGardner Denver Water Jetting Systems, Inc.

U.S. - TexasCompAir FZE Ltd.

UAECompAir Acquisition Ltd.

United KingdomCompAir Broom Wade Ltd.

United KingdomCompAir Finance Ltd.

United KingdomCompAir Holdings Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Holdings Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Industries Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver International Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Ltd.

United KingdomGD First (UK) Ltd.

United KingdomShanghai Compressors and Blowers Ltd.

United Kingdom     *
    
    Joint Venture
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1771-DR]


Illinois; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1771-DR), dated June 24, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the 
President's June 30, 2008, amended declaration authorizing Federal 
funds for emergency protective measures, including direct Federal 
assistance, at 90 percent Federal funding of total eligible costs under 
the Public Assistance program, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
Administration's National Weather Service River Forecast Center has 
established that the rivers in the State of Illinois, which have 
experienced historical flooding, fell below flood stage on August 6, 
2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs, 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-19016 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
[Cite as Assn. of Cleveland Fire Fighters IAFF Local 93 v. Cleveland Dept. of Law, 2020-Ohio-4902.]

{¶1} On June 11, 2020, a special master issued a report and recommendation 

(R&R) in this public-records case. The special master recommends that the court find 

that (1) requester's claim for production of the requested record has been rendered 

moot; (2) respondent failed to provide information and opportunity for requester to 

revise an allegedly ambiguous request; (3) respondent failed to provide the requested 

record within a reasonable period of time; (4) requester is entitled to recover from 

respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs 

associated with the action that were incurred by requester; and (5) court costs should 

be assessed to respondent. 

{¶2} Neither party has filed timely written objections to the R&R, as permitted by 

R.C. 2743.75(F)(2) and tolled by 2020 Am.Sub.H.B. No. 197. Pursuant to R.C. 

2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and 

recommendation, this court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the 

report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other 

defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” 

{¶3} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other 

defect evident on the face of the R&R of June 11, 2020. The court therefore adopts the 

special master’s R&R, including the special master’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, 

and recommendations contained in the R&R. Judgment is rendered in favor of 

ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND FIRE 

FIGHTERS IAFF LOCAL 93 

 Requester 

 v. 

CITY OF CLEVELAND, DEPARTMENT 

OF LAW 

 Respondent 

Case No. 2020-00103PQ 

Judge Patrick M. McGrath 

JUDGMENT ENTRY 
Case No. 2020-00103PQ -2- ENTRY 

requester. Requester is entitled to recover from respondent the amount of the filing fee 

of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that are incurred by 

requester, but requester is not entitled to recover attorney fees. Court costs are 

assessed against respondent. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this 

judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. 

 

 PATRICK M. MCGRATH 

 Judge 

Filed August 11, 2020 

Sent to S.C. Reporter 10/12/20
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

December 1, 2023 CR-2022-1326 Sylvester Jackson, Jr. v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Escambia Circuit Court: CC-86-115.66) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on December 1, 2023, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

June 12, 2014

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal Nos. 2013-1245, -1246, -1247

ALLERGAN, INC., AND DUKE UNIVERSITY,

v.

APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ, INC., AND 

HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.,. 

Decided: June 10, 2014

Precedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following changes: 

“Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and HARVEN V.

DESHIELD, Locke Lord LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for Apotex Inc., et al.” to “Of counsel were LUKE T. SHANNON and 

HARVEN V. DESHIELD, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik 

LLP, of Chicago, Illinois.”
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lamonte Jermaine Haskett v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00581

- CR

Trial court case number: CR 29991

Trial court: 75th District Court of Libert y County

On May 2, 2014, counsel for appellant filed a motion to dismiss. The motion is

DENIED , as it is not signed by appellant as required by T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

The motion, however, indicates a Motion for New Trial was granted by the trial court on

September 4, 201 3

. The granting of a motion for new trial restores the case to its position before

the former trial and renders any appeal moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 21.9(b).

Our record, however, does not contain an order or transcript of a hearing granting a

motion for new trial. The clerk of the trial court is ORDERED , within 30 days of the date of

this order, to file a supplemental record containing the order granting a new trial, or verify that

no such order exists.

The court repo rter is ORDERED , within 30 days of the date of this order, to file a

transcript of the September 4, 2013 hearing, or verify that no transcript was taken.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Act ing individually  Acting for the Court

Date: May 8, 2014
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David J. Kvapil, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ DAVID J. KVAPIL
-------------------
Name: David J. Kvapil
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 13, 2004


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### THOMAS et al. v. M. W. EUREKA GRAND LODGE, etc.

No. 4926.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1935.

H. L. Hughes, of Natchitoches, for appellant.

Leo Gold, of Alexandria, for appellees.

DREW, Judge.

In this suit the lower court rendered judgment for plaintiffs, as prayed for, and defendant perfected an appeal to this court. Counsel for defendant has made no appearance in this court by argument or brief, and has pointed out no error in the judgment of the lower court. We therefore conclude the appeal has been abandoned.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the appeal taken herein be dismissed as abandoned.
reg-ex4e_887.htm



Exhibit 4(e)

 

DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

As of December 31, 2019, Regency Centers Corporation (“Regency” or “our”) had one class of securities, our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

The following description of our capital stock is a summary and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the provisions of our Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles”) and our Bylaws, as amended and restated (the “Bylaws”), copies of which are incorporated by reference as Exhibits 3(a) and 3(b) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 of which this Exhibit 4(e) is a part. 

 

Description of Common Stock of Regency

 

The total number of shares of capital stock authorized by the Articles is 260,000,000, consisting of 220,000,000 shares of Common Stock, 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 10,000,000 shares of special common stock which may be issued in one or more classes or series as described in the Articles.  Holders of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. All actions submitted to a vote of shareholders are voted on by holders of Common Stock voting together as a single class. Holders of Common Stock are not entitled to cumulative voting in the election of directors. 

Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends in cash or in property on an equal share-for-share basis, if and when dividends are declared on the Common Stock by our board of directors, subject to any preference in favor of outstanding shares of preferred stock. 

In the event of the liquidation of our company, all holders of Common Stock will participate on an equal share-for-share basis with each other in our net assets available for distribution after payment of our liabilities and payment of any liquidation preferences in favor of outstanding shares of preferred stock. 

Holders of Common Stock are not entitled to preemptive rights, and the Common Stock is not subject to redemption. 

The rights of holders of Common Stock are subject to the rights of holders of any preferred stock that we have designated or may designate in the future. The rights of preferred shareholders may adversely affect the rights of the common shareholders.
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Dwight WHITING and George N. Whiting, Trustees, and Beneficiaries for and of Emily S. Perkins, Deceased.

No. 8579.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 17, 1938.

James W. Morris, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

Dana Latham and George Bouchard, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, and by direction of the court, it is ordered that the petition to review herein be dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court herein issue forthwith.
#### Adolph Bauman, Respondent, v. Lippman Tannenbaum, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 033-95702, 033-97542, 333-02828, 333-02892,333-20245, 333-24493, 333-30328, 333-40185 and 333-123434 of Protection One, Inc.on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-140362 of Protection One, Inc. onAmendment No. 1 to Form S-4 and in Registration Statement No. 333-50383 ofProtection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. on Form S-3, ofour report dated March 15, 2007, (which report expresses an unqualified opinionand includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting forshare-based compensation in 2006) relating to the consolidated financialstatements and consolidated financial statement schedule of Protection One, Inc.,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Protection One, Inc. andProtection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Kansas City, Missouri         |
| March 15, 2007                |

 

----
174 La. 386

#### Mr. and Mrs. John David WIRTH v. Adolphus ALBERT et al.

No. 31270.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1932.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1932.

Deutsch & Kerrigan, Milling, Godchaux, Saal, Milling, and E, D. Saunders, all of New Orleans, for appellants.

Edward Rightor, of New Orleans, for A. Albert, Lynn H. Dinkins, and Dr. George A. Mc-Dlarmid.

St. Clair Adams, of New Orleans, for Eugene J. Appolonio, Arthur F. Shuey, and Donald Yarbrough.

Terriberry, Young, Rault & Carroll, of New Orleans, for Leigh Carroll.

Harry McCall, of New Orleans, for Henry H. Chaffe.

Charles J. Rivet, of New Orleans, for William T. Coats.

Legier, MeEnerny & Waguespaek, of New Orleans, for Joseph A. Danna.

George Dreyfous, of New Orleans, for Felix J. Dreyfous.

Sidney Herold, of Shreveport, for Charles Ellerbe.

Montgomery & Montgomery and Harry F. Stiles, Jr., all of New Orleans, for Bush M. Jackson.

Racivitch & Hickerson, of New Orleans, for Fred N. Ogden.

Philip Gidiere, of New Orleans, for Esmond Phelps.

Merrick, Schwarz, Guste, Barnett & Red-mann, of New Orleans, for John W. Phillips, Marcus Walker, Harold S. Weil, and Herman Weil.

Morris LeCompte, of New Orleans, for Cecil G. Robinson.

Borah & Bloch, of New Orleans, for Dr. Paul H. Saunders.

Harvey Peltier, of Thibodaux, for H. L. Sims.

Dart & Dart, of New Orleans, for Sidney W. Souers.

Guión & Upton, of New Orleans, for Emile Sundbery and John S. Waterman.

Henry & Cooper, of New Orleans, for Charles B. Thorn.

ROGERS, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their suit on an exception of no cause of action.

The defendants in the case are the same as the defendants in the case of Charles Wirth, Sr., v. Albert et al. (La. Sup.) 141 So. 1, this day decided; and, except as to the parties plaintiff, the amount involved, and the numbers of the interim certificates, the cases are identical. What we said in affirming the judgment in the other ease is equally applicable to the present case.

For the reasons assigned in Wirth v. Albert, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Exhibit 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We have issued our report dated December 29, 2004 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements of Capitol First Corporation for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2003 included in Capitol First Corporation's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of the aforementioned report in the Company's Form
S-8 Registration Statement (File No. 333-83806) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 6, 2002 to register securities underlying the
Non-Qualified Employee Incentive Stock Plan.

/s/ BAUM & COMPANY, P.A.

Coral Springs, Florida
December 29, 2004
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph J. Bouffard                              
|                      |  |  |  | Joseph J. Bouffard                                  
|                      |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Anthony R. Cole                                 
|                      |  |  |  | Anthony R. Cole                                     
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer