alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFLM Minerals Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Jianxing Qian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 16thday of July, 2007.

JIANXING QIANJianxing QianChief Financial Officer



























---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1710

DAVID E. HENDERSON, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

JOHN NALAND, President American Foreign Service Association 

(AFSA); SHARON LATE, General Counsel American Foreign 

Service Association (AFSA), 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:08-cv-00535-LMB-TCB) 

Submitted: November 13, 2008 Decided: November 19, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

David E. Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 David E. Henderson appeals the district court's order 

dismissing without prejudice his complaint against Defendants 

asserting they wrongfully refused to assist him in obtaining the 

medical retirement benefits he was allegedly denied in 1981. 

Because Henderson may amend his complaint to cure the defects 

identified by the district court, the dismissal order is 

interlocutory and not appealable. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, 

Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005); Domino Sugar Corp. 

v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th 

Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
#### Patrick J. STEARNS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Jacob J. PARKER, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 71-2871.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 27, 1972.

Stan Pitkin, U. S. Atty., Charles W. Billinghurst, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tacoma, Wash., John E. Havelock, Atty. Gen., Anchorage, Alaska, Seaborn J. Bucka-*1091lew, Jr., Dist. Atty., Robert L. Eastaugh, Charles M. Merriner, Asst. Dist. Attys., Third Judicial Dist., Anchorage, Alaska, for respondent-appellant.

J. Anthony Hoare, of Horswill, Keller, Rohrback, Waldo & Moren, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner-appellee.

Before HAMLEY, DUNIWAY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick J. Stearns was convicted in Alaska state court on two counts of forgery. Two seven-year concurrent sentences were imposed. Stearns was incarcerated in the federal penitentiary at McNeil Island, Washington in 1968 pursuant to a contract between Alaska and the federal government. In August 1971, his petition for habeas corpus was granted by the district court upon a determination that Alaska law required his release. The custodian and the State of Alaska appeal contending that Stearns failed to exhaust available state remedies and that the district court improperly interpreted an Alaska statute.

Stearns was in a federal prison pursuant to the judgment of an Alaska state court. The federal authorities were acting solely as agents for Alaska and Alaska retained jurisdiction over its prisoner.1 Stearns is therefore a state prisoner, Eckman v. Byington, 290 F.2d 1, 2 (9th Cir. 1961), and cannot avail himself of federal habeas relief in the absence of proof of exhaustion of state remedies or that state remedies are ineffective. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 92 S.Ct. 509, 30 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971); Keeton v. Procurer, 468 F.2d 810 (9th Cir. 1972). This he has not done.

We do not reach the question of whether the district court’s interpretation of the Alaska statute was proper because of the exhaustion deficiency present. We decline to suggest any resolution on the merits of that issue. Slayton v. Smith, 404 U.S. 53, 92 S.Ct. 174, 30 L.Ed.2d 209 (1971).

The order of the district court granting the writ of habeas corpus is vacated. The district court will hold the matter in abeyance for sixty days after receipt by it of the mandate herein to permit the appellee to seek relief in the courts of Alaska. If appellee does file for such state court relief within that time, the district court shall continue to hold the matter until it is finally concluded in the state courts. During the time this matter is held in abeyance, appellee shall be deemed released on bail on his personal recognizance.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

1

. Alaska Stat. § 33.30.060(b).
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 11355]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Idaho (FEMA-1781-DR), dated 07/31/2008. *Incident:*
                         Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         05/15/2008 through 06/09/2008. *Effective Date:*
                         07/31/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/29/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/01/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road,  Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,  U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 07/31/2008, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Kootenai, Shoshone. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Idaho:  Benewah, Bonner, Clearwater. Montana:  Mineral, Sanders. Washington:  Spokane. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere:
5.250( print page 46962)Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage and for economic injury is 11355. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-18567 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48245-48246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Meetings of Humanities Panel

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that the 
following meetings of Humanities Panels will be held at the Old Post 
Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael P. McDonald, Advisory 
Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, 
Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained 
by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed meetings are for the purpose of 
panel review, discussion, evaluation and recommendation on applications 
for financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and 
the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including discussion of 
information given in confidence to the agency by the grant applicants. 
Because the proposed meetings will consider information that is likely 
to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial information 
obtained from a person and privileged or confidential and/or 
information of a personal nature the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, pursuant 
to authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to 
Close Advisory Committee meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have 
determined that these meetings will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsections (c)(4),

[[Page 48246]]

and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    1. Date: September 3, 2008.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Room: 421.
    Program: This meeting, which will be by teleconference, will review 
applications for America's Historical and Cultural Organizations 
Implementation Grants Program, submitted to the Division of Public 
Programs at the August 27, 2008 deadline.
    2. Date: September 30, 2008.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Room: 402.
    Program: This meeting, which will be by teleconference, will review 
applications for NEH/DOE Humanities High Performance Computing, 
submitted to the Office of Digital Humanities at the July 15, 2008 
deadline.

Michael P. McDonald,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-19025 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 807

To protect the Constitution of the United States from unauthorized encroachment into legislative powers by the executive branch, and to protect

the American taxpayer from unauthorized encroachment into his wallet

by an unconstitutional action of the President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1995

Mr. STOCKMAN (for himself, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. FUNDERBURK, Mr.

BURTON, Mrs. CHENOWETH, Mr. COOLEY, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr.

GANSKE, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. HAYWORTH, Mr. HUNTER, Mr.

METCALF, Mr. SALMON, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mrs.

SEASTRAND, Mr. SOUDER, and Mr. WAMP) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

and, in addition, to the Committee on International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To protect the Constitution of the United States from unauthorized encroachment into legislative powers by the executive branch, and to protect the American taxpayer

from unauthorized encroachment into his wallet by an

unconstitutional action of the President.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 807 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Protection

3 Act of 1995.’’

4 SEC. 2. TAXPAYER PROTECTION.

5 No funds appropriated or otherwise made available

6 under any provision of law, for any fiscal year, may be

7 used in any way, directly or indirectly, for the purpose

8 of any swap, loan, loan guarantee, or grant to Mexico un9 less and until Congress has affirmatively approved such

10 swap, loan, loan guarantee, or grant to Mexico.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I,  Mitchell  Binder, Chief Financial Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:
(1)     the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2009 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934;  and
(2)     information  contained  in  the  Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: May 15, 2009
                                   /s/ Mitchell Binder
                                   -------------------
                                   Mitchell Binder
                                   Chief Financial Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
#### Russell *v.*Twin Coach Corp.

(No. 23606

Decided June 15, 1932.)

*Mr. Joseph A. Robb*and *Mr. W. J. Beckley,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McKeehan, Merrick, Arter <& Stewart, Messrs. Loomis é Caris, Mr. Neil P. Beall, Mr. Blake C. Cook, Mr. H. R. Loomis*and *Mr. Thomas V. Koykka,*for defendant in error.

*644It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Klnkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Floyd E. Taub M.D. certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CytoCore, Inc.; (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; (4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and (5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Floyd E. Taub M. D.     Floyd E. Taub M. D.    Chief Executive Officer    Dated: August 16, 2007
EXHIBIT 15. LETTER REGARDING UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
  of Flex Products, Inc.
Santa Rosa, California

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim financial
information of Flex Products, Inc. for the three-month and nine-month
periods ended August 2, 1997 as indicated in our report dated August 15,
1997.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 1998, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-41050,
No. 33-26271, No. 33-12276, No. 33-48808, No. 33-65132, No. 33-60891 and
No. 333-13013 on Forms S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-61177 and
No. 33-65319 on Form S-3.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Francisco, California

September 14, 1998
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gregory L. Paige, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gregory L. Paige





Gregory L. Paige


Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 14, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
225 So.2d 790

#### T. C. HALE v. STATE.

8 Div. 363.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 14, 1969.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.

.No attorney for respondent.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

SIMPSON, Justice.

Petition of the State on the relation of its Attorney General for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Hale v. State, 45 Ala.App. 97, 225 So.2d 787 (8 Div. 190).

Writ denied.

' COLEMAN, HARWOOD and BLOOD-WORTH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 15




April 30, 1998



Orion Capital Corporation
Farmington, Connecticut


We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public  Accountants,  of the unaudited  interim financial
information of Orion Capital  Corporation and subsidiaries for the periods ended
March 31,  1998 and 1997,  as  indicated  in our report  dated  April 30,  1998;
because  we  did  not  perform  an  audit,  we  expressed  no  opinion  on  that
information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended  March  31,  1998,  is
incorporated  by reference in  Registration  Statements No. 2-65348 on Forms S-8
and S-16  relating to the Orion Capital  Corporation  1976 and 1979 Stock Option
Plans,  No. 2-80636 on Form S-8 relating to the Orion Capital  Corporation  1982
Long-Term  Performance  Incentive  Plan, No. 2-63344 on Form S-8 relating to the
Orion Capital  Corporation  Employees'  Stock Savings and  Retirement  Plan, No.
33-59847 on Form S-8 relating to the Orion Capital Corporation 1994 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee  Directors,  and No. 333-44901 on Form S-8 relating to the
Wm. H. McGee & Co., Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan .

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act, is not  considered  a part of the  Registration  Statement
prepared or certified by an accountant  or a report  prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Hartford, Connecticut


                                       29
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE For The
                  Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996
                             (Dollars in thousands)



                                       Years Ended December 31,
                           ------------------------------------------------
                                    1998             1997              1996
                           ------------------------------------------------
<S>                        <C>              <C>               <C>

Net Income (Numerator)     $     165,197    $      154,955    $     112,027
                           ================================================

Weighted average common 
 and effect of dilutive 
 shares used in the 
 computation of net 
 income per share:
 Average shares 
  outstanding - basic 
  (denominator)               50,374,329        50,476,330       50,566,566
 Effect of dilutive 
  shares:
  Options outstanding            287,298           285,685          143,855
  Options exercised                  739               676              167
  Options cancelled                2,632             2,476              247
                           ------------------------------------------------
 Average share 
  outstanding - diluted 
  (denominator)               50,664,998        50,765,167       50,710,835


Net Income per common 
 share:
 Basic                     $        3.28    $         3.07    $        2.22
 Diluted                            3.26              3.05             2.21


</TABLE>