alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Lowber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  June 4, 2008 | /s/ John M. Lowber      |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                | John M. Lowber          |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |
|                | GCI, Inc.               |

 

 

 

1
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 516

To authorize, with respect to certain former employees of the United States

whose firefighting functions were transferred from the Department of

Energy to Los Alamos County, New Mexico, the payment of the amounts

needed by those individuals in order to qualify for benefits under the

retirement system to which they became subject as a result of the

transfer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 13, 1995

Mr. RICHARDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To authorize, with respect to certain former employees of

the United States whose firefighting functions were

transferred from the Department of Energy to Los Alamos County, New Mexico, the payment of the amounts

needed by those individuals in order to qualify for benefits under the retirement system to which they became

subject as a result of the transfer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 516 IH

1 SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

2 The purpose of this Act is to facilitate the purchase

3 of service credit, under the retirement system for employ4 ees of the State of New Mexico, by certain former employ5 ees of the United States who became employees of Los

6 Alamos County, New Mexico, as a result of the transfer

7 of certain firefighting functions from the Department of

8 Energy to that county in 1989.

9 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION.

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to carry out the purpose

11 of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury (or his designee)

12 and an individual designated by the Governor of New Mex13 ico shall enter into an agreement, as soon as practicable,

14 under which—

15 (1) all individuals on behalf of whom any

16 amounts payable under this Act shall be identified;

17 (2) the amount payable on behalf of each such

18 individual under this Act shall be determined; and

19 (3) any procedures necessary to carry out this

20 Act shall be established.

21 (b) LIMITATION.—The amount payable on behalf of

22 any individual under this Act may not exceed the amount

23 by which—

24 (1) the total amount payable by the individual

25 in order to receive service credit, under the retire26 ment system referred to in section 1, for the period
3

•HR 516 IH

1 of service as a firefighter rendered by such individ2 ual as an employee of the Department of Energy;

3 exceeds

4 (2)(A) the lump-sum credit (as defined by ap5 plicable provisions of title 5, United States Code)

6 paid to such individual based on such individual’s

7 separation from the Department of Energy; or

8 (B) in the case of any individual whose lump9 sum credit (as so defined) included amounts attrib10 utable to service other than as a firefighter under

11 the Department of Energy, the portion of the lump12 sum credit attributable to service as such a fire13 fighter.

14 (c) AUTHORIZATION.—There is authorized to be ap15 propriated, out of amounts in the Treasury not otherwise

16 appropriated, such sums as may be necessary to carry out

17 this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF PARADYNE NETWORKS, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradyne Networks, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick M. Murphy, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/    Patrick M. Murphy                    
|Patrick M. Murphy                           
|Senior Vice President,                      
|Chief Financial Officer,                    
|Secretary and Treasurer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|Date: August 8, 2005                        



25
----

| (1)   | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 20, 2008 |  /s/      John M. Lowber |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                         | John M.      Lowber           |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer  |
|                         | GCI,      Inc.                |

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 752

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in

tax on fuel used in commercial aviation which is scheduled to take

effect on October 1, 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 31, 1995

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia (for himself, Ms. DUNN of Washington, Mrs.

MYRICK, Mr. CLINGER, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr.

PARKER, Mr. TALENT, Mr. LINDER, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. BUNNING of

Kentucky, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. MINETA, Mr. SHUSTER,

Mr. OBERSTAR, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. FAWELL, Mr. QUINN, and Mr.

RAMSTAD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the increase in tax on fuel used in commercial aviation

which is scheduled to take effect on October 1, 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Aviation

5 Fuel Tax Repeal Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 752 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SCHEDULED INCREASE IN TAX ON FUEL

2 USED IN COMMERCIAL AVIATION.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

4 4092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

5 to exemptions) is amended by striking ‘‘is attributable

6 to—’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘is attributable

7 to the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund

8 financing rate imposed by such section.’’

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

10 (1) Paragraph (4) of section 6427(l) of such

11 Code is amended by striking ‘‘is attributable to—’’

12 and all that follows and inserting ‘‘is attributable to

13 the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund

14 financing rate imposed by such section.’’

15 (2) Section 13245 of the Omnibus Budget Rec16 onciliation Act of 1993 is hereby repealed.

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

18 this section shall take effect on September 30, 1995.

Æ
CASE NO. 04-14-00483-CV

ROWLAND J. MARTIN, IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

ADMNISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE

OF JOHNNIE MAE KING,

Appellant

v.

EDWARD BRAVENEC AND 1216

WEST AVE., INC.

Appellees

1 \i<

FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT^

CO -•' •••-

CO

ro

. • •

BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLANT'S ADVISORY TO THE COURT AND

NOTICE OF AMENDMENTS TO APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

NOW COMES ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR., Appellant in the above entitled and

numbered cause, and files this, his "Advisory to The CourtAnd Notice ofAmendments To

Appellant's Opening Brief," in support of which the following is shown:

Notice is hereby given that Appellant has filed an "Expedited Amended Motion To

Strike, " in which Appellant requests the Fifth Circuit Court ofAppeals to strike Appellees'

Responding Brief in Fifth Circuit Case No. 14-50093. See, Exhibits A, B and C. The motion

advises the U.S. Court of Appeals that Appellees are parties to a Strategic Lawsuit Against

Public Participation, (SLAPP) and that Appellees' attempt to invoke appellate jurisdiction is

unwarranted insofar as their Responding Brief asks that Court to apply the collateral order rule to

grant untimely and unsupported requests for affirmative relief involving Western District Case

No. SA 11 -CV-0414 in the pending collateral review in Case No. 14-50093. Out of an

abundance of caution to reserve all lines of argument, and to avoid unintended waivers in

connection with a future reply brief, Appellant requests notice that his opening brief is hereby
Exhibit 10.3

PROTECTION ONE, INC.  1997 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN  (as amended)

1.Purposes.The purposes of this 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as from time to time amended, the
"Plan") are (i) to align the interests of the Company's stockholders and the recipients of awards under this Plan by increasing the proprietary interest of such recipients in the Company's
growth and success, (ii) to advance the interests of the Company by attracting and retaining for the Company and its Subsidiaries the services of directors, officers and other key employees,
consultants and agents, and (iii) to motivate such persons to act in the long-term best interests of the Company's stockholders.

2.Definitions.For purposes of the Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below unless a
different meaning is plainly required by the context:



---





---





3.Administration.



---





4.Shares Subject to the Plan.



---





5.Specific Terms of Awards.



---





---





---





6.Certain Provisions Applicable to Awards.



---





7.Change of Control Provisions.



---





8.General Provisions.



---





---





---



QuickLinks
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 782

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to allow members of employee

associations to represent their views before the United States Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1995

Mr. WOLF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to allow members of employee associations to represent their views

before the United States Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPRESENTATION OF VIEWS.

4 Section 205 of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i)

6 and by inserting after subsection (g) the following:

7 ‘‘(h) Nothing in this section shall prevent an officer

8 or employee of the Government, if not inconsistent with

9 the faithful performance of such officer’s or employee’s

10 duties, from representing an employee association before,
2

•HR 782 IH

1 or the interest of the members of the association to, the

2 Executive Branch or any agency of the Government. For

3 purposes of this subsection, an employee association is an

4 association or component of an association, a majority of

5 whose members are officers or employees of the

6 Government.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel  “NEUROSCIENCE NRSA'S”.                     

*Date:*                         September 12, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 am to 4 pm.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Doubletree Hotel, 1515 Rhode Island Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review,  National Institute of Child Health and  Human Development, NIH,  6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01,  Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan  Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: August 12, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-19218 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 669

To repeal the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1995

Mr. BOEHNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To repeal the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act,

1930.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930,

4 is repealed.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 843 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 843

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exception to 
         the market discount rules for tax-exempt obligations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1995

 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Shaw) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the exception to 
         the market discount rules for tax-exempt obligations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EXCEPTION FROM MARKET DISCOUNT RULES FOR TAX-
              EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 1278(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining market discount bond) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subparagraph (B) the following 
        new clause:
                            ``(iv) Tax-exempt obligations.--Any tax-
                        exempt obligation (as defined in section 
                        1275(a)(3)).'', and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and redesignating 
        subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (C).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Sections 1276(a)(4) and 1278(b)(1) of such Code are 
        each amended by striking ``103,''.
            (2) Subparagraph (B) of section 1278(a)(4) of such Code is 
        amended by striking ``or, in the case of a tax-exempt 
        obligation'' and all that follows and inserting a period.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to obligations purchased (within the meaning of section 
1272(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) after April 30, 1993.
                                 <all>
```
(No. 24068.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Albert Samuels, Plaintiff in Error.

*Opinion filed June 11, 1937.*

Henry C. Ferguson, and John E. Hogan, for plaintiff in error.

Otto Kerner, Attorney General, Thomas J. Courtney, State’s Attorney, and A. B. Dennis, (Edward E. Wilson, John T. Gallagher, Melvin S. Rembe, and Blair L. Varnes, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Shaw

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant, Albert Samuels, was tried in the criminal court of Cook county on an indictment charging him with forcible rape said to have been committed on the per*407son of Clara Carlis. On a trial before the court without a jury he was found guilty and sentenced to ten years imprisonment. He has sued out this writ of error.

Except for the direct assertion of Clara Carlis that the defendant raped her, and the defendant’s equally direct denial, there is no great amount of conflict in the evidence. Clara Carlis is the wife of George Carlis but was not living with him, except for an occasional call at his room in the Irving Park Hotel in Chicago, at which place he was registered as a single man. He was employed as a milkman and customarily left his room about midnight.

The defendant is a colored man thirty-five years old, married, and living with his family. The record shows that he left Georgia at the age of fifteen; worked in Philadelphia in a school for boys for about a year and a half; worked for two years in a school for girls; worked in a factory for a time and later, as a porter, for about four years in a Chicago bank until it failed. Eor the past several years he has been bellboy in different hotels. His good reputation for chastity and as a law abiding citizen was proved by several witnesses and not rebutted.

There is no question of law in the case which requires our consideration and there is nothing in the evidence which can be of any possible public interest. A careful review of the entire record, including a scrutiny of all surrounding circumstances leaves us with a grave and substantial doubt of the defendant’s guilt, and for that reason, alone, the judgment must be reversed. It affirmatively appears that all possible evidence has been introduced and the cause will therefore not be remanded.

The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county will be reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*
#### Matthew S. Baldwin et al. v. Lydia J. Schwall, Ex’x.

1. Appellate Court *Practice—Where No Errors Are*Assigned.— An assignment of errors is not a mere matter of form, but is one of substance and is essential. Where no errors are assigned, the decree below must be affirmed or the appeal dismissed.

Bill for the Foreclosure of a Mortgage.—-Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1902.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed February 9, 1903.

This is a bill for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The decree finds that complainant (here appellee) is the holder and.owner of the mortgage indebtedness; that the mortgage is a valid and subsisting lien upon the premises described therein, and that appellant Belle G. Baldwin is personally liable to the complainant for the amount due upon the unpaid note secured by said mortgage. It then finds the amount due to-the complainant and directs that if such amount be not paid within a fixed time, a sale of the premises be made by the master. From such decree this appeal was taken.

George S. Baker, attorney for appellants.

Ela, Grover & Graves, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Ball

delivered the opinion of the court.

We have carefully examined the original and the supplemental records in this case, and find that appellants have assigned no errors in this court. There is therefore noth*17ing before us for consideration. An assignment of errors is not a mere matter o.f form, but is one of substance and is essential. Ætna L. I. Co. v. Sanford, 197 Ill. 310; Cessna v. Benedict, 98 Ill. App. 440. This defect necessitates.an affirmance of the decree below, or a dismissal of the appeal. Kniel v. Spring V. C. Co., 96 Ill. App. 411.

Notwithstanding the lack of an assignment of errors, we have looked into the merits of this case, and are of the opinion that, even if errors had been assigned, we could not support the contentions of appellants.

For those reasons the decree of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Exhibit








Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. Officer Retirement Plan


Aflac Life Insurance Japan Ltd. (“Aflac Japan”) maintains an unwritten retirement plan (“Retirement Allowance”) available to certain officers of Aflac Japan who have served as officers for at least two years. The Chairman and Representative Director of Aflac Japan and the President and Representative Director of Aflac Japan are participants in the Retirement Allowance. The retirement benefit for the plan is calculated as follows: for each year of service (with a minimum of two years and maximum of twelve), a Japan participating officer would receive one month salary plus one year salary for the last year. The total amount calculated is paid in a lump sum at retirement.


Effective January 1 , 2020, the Retirement Allowance was amended to provide that in addition to the amount described above, executives who have SVP or higher titles would receive a certain amount for each year of service.
#### William L. Ligety, Respondent, v. American Cigar Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.