T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C AT HE R I NE ND UN GU , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 73432 A ge nc yN o. A 087- 056- 795 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2012 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: K O Z IN S K I, C h i ef Ju d g e, T A S H IM A an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P e t i t i one rC a the r i ne N dungu, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of K e ny a , pe t i t i ons f

or r e vi e w of

ade c i s i on bythe B oa r d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ( B I A ) a f f i rm i ng the Im m i grat i on Judg e’ s ( IJ ) deni alof as ylum , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef 

# FI LED OC T 18 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( C A T ) . T he B I A a f f i rm e d the I J ’ s de ni a l of N dungu’ s a s y l um c l a i m s pr i m a r i l yon a n a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyf i ndi ng, a nd a lte rn a tiv e ly , b e c au s e N du n g u f a ile dto c arryth e r e q u is ite b u r d e n o f p r o o f in es t abl i shi ng her c l ai m s. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew the a ge nc y ’ s f

a c tua l f i ndi ng f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a nd appl ythe “ t ot a l i tyof the c i r c um s t a nc e s ” s t a nda r d gove rni ng a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i ons unde rthe 2 0 0 5 R E A L I D A c t. Sh restha v. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d1 0 3 4 , 1 0 3 9

– 4 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . N du n g u ’s p e titio n is d e n ie d . T h e IJ fo u n dth atN du n g u ’ s asyl u m ap p l i cat i o n w as t i m e-b arred . B ecau se N du n g u d idn o t r a is e th e is s u e o n ap p e a l to th e B I A , th is is s u e is n o t r e v ie w ab le . T i j an iv. H older , 6 2 8 F .3 d1 0 7 1 , 1 0 8 1 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) , ce rt. deni ed , 131 S . C t . 2160 ( 2 0 1 1 ) . T h e B I A b a s e dits a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n o n tw o m a in i nc ons i s t e nc i e s be tw e e n he ra s y l um appl i c a t i on and t e s t i m onya the ri m m i gr a t i on hear i ng : (1) N du ng u’ s om i ss i on of her s exual as saul tby the M un gi ki , a c ri m i nal or ga ni z a t i on i n K e ny a , a nd ( 2) N dungu’ s f a i lur e t o r e c ountthe de a th thr e a tf r om her f i ancé . T hese di sc re panci es w er e not“ m i no r i ncon si st enci es thatre veal no thi ng abou tan as ylum appl i cant ’ s f ear f or [her ] sa fe ty, ” butrather,

“ i ncon si st enci es re gardi ng event s thatform the basi s of the as ylum cl ai m . ” Zam an ov v. H

older , 64 9 F . 3d 96 9, 97 3 (9th C i r. 20 11 ) ( ci t at i on and q uo t es3

om i tt ed). T he cl ai m s of the M un gi ki att ac k and death threa tfr om her f i ancé ar e c l os e l yr e l a t e d t o the r e a s ons w hys he purport s t o be a f r a i d t o r e turn t o K e ny a . T he c o m p le te f

a ilu r e to m e n tio n th e s e e v e n ts w e r e n o t “m e r e o m is s io n [ s ] o f d e ta ils ,” Ba n da r iv . I

NS , 22 7 F . 3d 11 60 , 11 67 (9th C i r. 20 00 ), bu tam ou nt ed t o “ [m ] at er i al a lte r a tio n s in th e ap p lic a n t’s a c c o u n t o f p e r s e c u tio n ,” w h ic h “a r e s u f f ic ie n t to supp ortan advers e c re di bi l i ty f i nd i ng . ” Zam anov , 6 4 9 F .3 dat 9 7 3 . T h e B IA ’s advers e c re di bi l i ty det erm i nat i on i s s up po rt ed by subst ant i alevi dence and based up o n “s p e c if

ic c o g e n t r e a s o n [ s ]” f

o rits s ta te dd is b e lie f

o f N du n g u ’s te s tim o n y . G u iv . I NS , 2 8 0 F .3 d1 2 1 7 , 1 2 2 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) ( c ita tio n a n dq u o te s o m itte d ) . N o th in g in th e r e c o r dc o m p e ls th e c o n c lu s io n th a t N du n g u w a s c r e d ib le . A c c o r d in g ly , in th e ab s e n c e o f c r e d ib le te s tim o n y , w e d e n yth e p e titio n a s to N du n g u ’s c la im s f

o ra s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, an dC A T r e lie f . Se e Farah v . A s h c r o ft , 3 4 8 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 6

– 5 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . P E T I T I ON DE NI E D.