U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 MANDATORY SENTENCING AND THE ABOLITION OF PLEA BARGAINING - THE MICHIGAN FELONY FIREARM STATUTE
NCJ Number
              59921
Journal

*Law and Society Review* Volume: 13 Issue: 2 Dated: SPECIAL ISSUE (WINTER 1979) Pages: 393-430
Author(s)
          M HEUMANN;
                        C LOFTIN
Date Published

1979
Length
              38 pages
Annotation
              THE SIMULTANEOUS ATTEMPT TO ABOLISH PLEA BARGAINING AND TO INTRODUCE MANDATORY SENTENCING IN WAYNE COUNTY (DETROIT), MICH., IS EXAMINED IN THIS STUDY.
Abstract
              EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN THAT WHEN AN ATTEMPT IS MADE TO PROHIBIT PLEA BARGAINING, THE RESULTANT DECREASE IN PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION IS COMPENSATED FOR BY AN INCREASE IN JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND INVOLVEMENT IN SENTENCE NEGOTIATIONS. CONVERSELY, WHEN MANDATORY SENTENCES ARE IMPOSED (REDUCING JUDICIAL DISCRETION), EXPERIENCE SHOWS THAT PROSECUTORS EXERCISE MORE DISCRETION IN DETERMINING CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST DEFENDANTS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT TO DETERMINE HOW THE SYSTEM WOULD RESPOND IF BOTH ACTIONS WERE INTRODUCED AT ONCE. THE MICHIGAN FELONY FIREARM STATUTE, WHICH WENT INTO EFFECT IN 1977, WAS FOLLOWED BY THE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S ANNOUNCEMENT THAT HIS OFFICE WOULD NOT ENTER INTO PLEA BARGAINING IN CASES COVERED BY THIS ACT. THIS STUDY OBTAINED DATA FROM 23 INTERVIEWS WITH COURT PERSONNEL AND ALSO COLLECTED CRIME, DEFENDANT, AND DISPOSITION DATA FOR SEVEN CATEGORIES OF OFFENSES FOR THE 6-MONTH PERIOD BEFORE AND AFTER THE LAW WENT INTO EFFECT. THOUGH SOME EVIDENCE SUGGESTS THAT THE LAW AND PROHIBITION ON PLEA BARGAINING MAY HAVE SELECTIVELY INCREASED SENTENCING SEVERITY FOR CERTAIN CLASSES OF OFFENDERS, DISPOSITION PATTERNS DID NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN DRAMATICALLY ALTERED. IN MANY SERIOUS CASES, SENTENCES FOR THE PRIMARY FELONY WERE ADJUDICATED DOWNWARD TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE ADDITIONAL 2-YEAR PENALTY. IN 'EQUITY' CASES, IN WHICH THE DEFENDANTS HAD NOT PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED PRISON TIME; OTHER MECHANISMS, SUCH AS ABBREVIATED BENCH TRIALS, WERE OFTEN EMPLOYED TO CIRCUMVENT THE MANDATORY SENTENCING PROVISION. THESE FINDINGS SUGGEST THE DIFFICULTY OF ACHIEVING RADICAL CHANGE WITHIN THE SYSTEM, SINCE IT CAN ADJUST TO, AND THUS FRUSTRATE, ANY RADICAL REFORM. STATISTICAL TABLES, FOOTNOTES, AND REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED. (KCP)
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        78NI-AX-0021


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored
    
  
  
Date Published: January 1, 1979
    
          Downloads
        
                      *No download available*

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Mandatory sentencing
        Michigan
        Sentencing
        Prosecutorial discretion
        Adult correctional facilities



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Distance to Trauma Centers Among Gunshot Wound Victims: Identifying Trauma 'Deserts' and 'Oases' in Detroit
                  Neighborhood matters: the impact of community context on the cumulative case processing of firearm offenses
                  Where is the Evidence? Comparing the Effects of Evidence Strength and Demographic Characteristics on Plea Discounts
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov