alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-1263

___________________________

Douglas Earl Leiter, also known as William Jackson

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

v.

Christopher Nickrenz, Warden, FPC - Duluth

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________

 Submitted: September 7, 2017

Filed: September 11, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Douglas Earl Leiter, a/k/a William Jackson, appeals following the dismissal of

an action which the district court construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which 1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Becky R.
Leiter challenged a prison disciplinary proceeding that resulted in his loss of goodtime credits. Although we recognize that Leiter was not exclusively seeking

restoration of his good-time credits, we conclude that the matter was properly

construed as a section 2241 petition. Cf. Portley-El v. Brill, 288 F.3d 1063, 1066 (8th

Cir. 2002) (because good-time credits affect length of inmate’s confinement, habeas

corpus is exclusive federal remedy when prisoner seeks restoration of good-time

credits taken away by prison disciplinary proceeding).

Having carefully reviewed the record, however, we conclude the case is now

moot: Leiter was released from prison while this appeal was pending, return of the

good-time credits would have no effect on his current term ofsupervised release, and

at thistime we see no collateral consequencesfromthe challenged disciplinary action.

See United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53, 54-59 (2000) (supervised release begins

when prisoner is released from prison; excess prison time served cannot offset term

of supervised release); cf. Leonard v. Nix, 55 F.3d 370, 372-73 (8th Cir.1995)

(release of prisoner (subsequently reincarcerated) did not moot habeas petition where

challenged disciplinary action had collateral consequences).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

Thorson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael L. Heider, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date:	October 20, 2004 | By: | /S/ MICHAEL L. HEIDER                
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                      
|                       |     | Michael L. Heider                    
|                       |     | Vice President Finance, Treasurer and
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 84

To prohibit the importation into the United States of sugar from countries

that import sugar from Cuba.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. DIAZ-BALART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To prohibit the importation into the United States of sugar

from countries that import sugar from Cuba.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, sugars,

5 syrups, and molasses, that are the product of a country

6 that the President determines has imported sugar, syrup,

7 or molasses that is the product of Cuba, shall be entered,

8 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, into the

9 customs territory of the United States, unless the condi10 tion set forth in section 2 is met.
2

HR 84 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDITION FOR REMOVAL OF PROHIBITION.

2 The prohibition set forth in section 1 shall cease to

3 apply to a country if the country certifies to the President

4 that the country will not import sugar, syrup, or molasses

5 that is the product of Cuba until free and fair elections,

6 conducted under the supervision of internationally recog7 nized observers, are held in Cuba. Such certification shall

8 cease to be effective if the President makes a subsequent

9 determination under section 1 with respect to that coun10 try.

11 SEC. 3. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

12 The President shall report to the Congress all deter13 minations made under section 1 and all certifications

14 made under section 2.

15 SEC. 4. REALLOCATION OF SUGAR QUOTAS.

16 During any period in which a prohibition under sec17 tion 1 is in effect with respect to a country, the President

18 may reallocate to other countries the quota of sugars, syr19 ups, and molasses allocated to that country, before the

20 prohibition went into effect, under chapter 17 of the Har21 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 778 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 778

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
of an annual screening mammography under part B of the medicare program 
                       for women age 65 or older.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 1995

 Mrs. Vucanovich (for herself and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following 
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce and, in addition, 
  to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
of an annual screening mammography under part B of the medicare program 
                       for women age 65 or older.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Access to Annual Screening 
Mammography Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death by 
        cancer in women.
            (2) An estimated 182,000 new invasive cases of breast 
        cancer in the United States are expected during 1995.
            (3) An estimated 46,240 individuals are expected to die of 
        breast cancer during 1995, of whom 46,000 will be women.
            (4) There is no cure for breast cancer.
            (5) Early detection is the key to survival of this 
        devastating disease.
            (6) Mammography is recognized as a valuable diagnostic 
        technique for the detection of breast cancer.
            (7) The American Cancer Society and the National Cancer 
        Institute recommend an annual mammogram for women over age 50.

SEC. 3. COVERAGE OF ANNUAL SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY UNDER MEDICARE FOR 
              WOMEN AGE 65 OR OLDER.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(c)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395m(c)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (iv), by striking ``but under 65 years of 
        age,''; and
            (2) by striking clause (v).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to screening mammography performed on or after January 1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Midas Medici Group Holdings,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Johnson Kachidza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  January
      19, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Johnson KachidzaJohnson
      Kachidza
              Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)
18520.

#### Gaulding *v.*Courts *et al.*

Argued March 8, 1954

Decided April 13, 1954.

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The allegations and prayers of the petition and cross-action showing no grounds for equitable relief — the prayers being merely for judgment in stated amounts and the appointment of an auditor, and no complicated or intricate accounts being shown involving a trust fund as alleged — the case is one at law and not in equity, and the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of this writ of error. See Code § 37-301; *Burress*v. *Montgomery,*148 *Ga.*548 (97 S. E. 538); *Arthur Tufts Co.*v. *DeJarnette Supply Co.,*158 *Ga.*85 (123 S. E. 16); *Gormley*v. *Slicer,*178 *Ga.*85 (172 S. E. 21); *Universal Garage Co.*v. *Fowler,*184 *Ga.*604 (192 S. E. 299); *Henderson*v. *Curtis,*185 *Ga.*390, 392 (195 S. E. 152).

*Transferred to the Court of Appeals.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*528
      *C. 0. Baker, Robert E. Gibson, John M. Gaulding, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*James W. Arnold, Edwin Fortson,*contra.
192 La. 501

#### STATE v. CARLSON.

No. 35244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1939.

Preston L. Savoy, of Lake Charles, and Lottinger & O’Neal, of Houma, for appellant.

David M. Ellison, Atty. Gen., James O’-Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. V. Patti-son, Dist. Atty., and Coleman D. Reed and John H. Martin, Asst. Dist. Attys., all of Lake Charles, for the State.

PONDER, Justice.

The defendant, E. A. Carlson, was •convicted of the crime of grand larceny. The defendant’s counsel filed a motion for a new trial which was overruled by the lower court. From the extracts of the minutes of the lower court in this case it appears that the defendant’s counsel excepted to the overruling of the motion for a new trial and reserved a bill. The defendant’s counsel did not prepare a formal bill of exception and present it to the lower court for its signature and per curiam. The defendant was sentenced to the penitentiary to serve a term of not less than one, nor more than three years. The defendant’s counsel appealed. Bills of exceptions must be'prepared and presented to the trial court for its signature and per curiam before an appeal is taken. Articles 542 and 543, Code of Criminal Procedure; State v. Barrett, 137 La. 535, 68 So. 945; State v. Snowden, 174 La. 156, 140 So. 9.

The defendant’s counsel contends that there was no evidence on which the lower court could sustain a verdict of guilty. We find testimony copiec^ in the record but it cannot be considered by this court because it is not annexed to and made a part of a formal bill of exception. State v. Simmons, 118 La. 22, 42 So. 582.

There being no formal bill of exception prepared and presented to the trial court for its.signature and per curiam, no assignment of error, and no error on the face of the record the conviction and sentence must be affirmed. State v. Festervand, 189 La. 226, 179 So. 297.

For the reasons assigned the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

HIGGINS, J., absent.
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 

Chiasma, Inc. 
 140 Kendrick
Street 
 Building C East 

Needham, MA 02494 
 February 14, 2020 

William Ludlam 
 Re: Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive
Employment Letter 
 Dear Bill: 
 This Amendment (the
“Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Letter dated February 23, 2018 (the “Agreement”) confirms the amended terms and conditions of your employment with Chiasma, Inc. (the
“Company”) effective February 14, 2020. Except as expressly amended herein, the Agreement remains in full effect. Your Non-Competition,
Non-Solicitation, Confidentiality and Assignment Agreement with the Company dated May 8, 2015 is unaltered and unamended by this Amendment and remains in full effect. 

Section 8(e) of the Agreement is hereby amended by: 
  

	 	1.	 Adding, after the phrase “the year in which the Change in Control occurs,” the words “(b-i) your
accrued bonus (if any) with respect to the calendar year in which the Date of Termination occurs, subject to the Board’s assessment of applicable bonus criteria and prorated from the beginning of such year to the Date of Termination”;



  

	 	2.	 Adding, after the words “(a) and (b),” the words “and (b-i)” 



 

	 	3.	 Replacing the two instances of the words “six (6)” with the words “twelve (12)” ; and



  

	 	4.	 Replacing the words “one-half (1/2) of” with “one
times” 


 This Amendment constitutes the complete agreement between you and the Company with respect to the subject matter herein and
supersedes any prior agreements, representations or understandings (whether written, oral or implied) between you and the Company with respect to the subject matter herein. 

Please acknowledge, by signing below, that you have accepted this Amendment. 
  

					
	Very Truly Yours,	 		 	
			
	/s/ Raj Kannan	 		 	  

	 Raj Kannan
 Chief Executive Officer

Chiasma, Inc.
	 		 	

  

					
	I have read and accept this Amendment:	 		 	
			
	/s/ William Ludlam	 		 	02/14/2020
	William Ludlam	 		 	Date
#### A. B. Barr & Company, Respondent, v. Pierre D. Dumont, Appellant.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant perfect his appeal within ten days and put the cause at the foot of the calendar for disposition at this term of court, in which case the motion is denied. Present—Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 4, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas W. Hyde, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Douglas W. Hyde                  
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|Douglas W. Hyde                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|October 22, 2003                     



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and will be retained by OshKosh B'Gosh, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 569 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 569

To provide for the separate administration of the Border Patrol and the 
                Immigration and Naturalization Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1995

Mr. Beilenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the separate administration of the Border Patrol and the 
                Immigration and Naturalization Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADMINISTRATION OF THE BORDER PATROL.

    Effective October 1, 1995, the border patrol of the Immigration and 
Naturalization Service shall be administered through the Department of 
Justice under the Attorney General and shall not be part of, or 
administered through, the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I,  Dennis  Sunshine, Chief Executive Officer of Orbit International Corp.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as enacted by  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:
(1)     the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2007 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934;  and
(2)     information  contained  in  the  Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of Orbit
International  Corp.

Dated: May 14, 2007
                                   /s/ Dennis Sunshine
                                   -------------------
                                   Dennis Sunshine
                                   Chief Executive Officer

A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document  authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Orbit International Corp. and will
be  retained  by  Orbit  International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6080 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

5420 Kavanaugh Boulevard in Little Rock, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Ronald 

A. Robinson Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 26, 2021 

Mr. HILL (for himself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. WOMACK, and Mr. WESTERMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5420 Kavanaugh Boulevard in Little Rock, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘Ronald A. Robinson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RONALD A. ROBINSON POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 5420 Kavanaugh Boulevard in 

6 Little Rock, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Ronald A. Robinson Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, or other record of the United States 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6080 IH

1 to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Ronald A. Robinson Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS