alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OREGON METALLURGICAL CORPORATION


                               EXHIBIT 11.1

                      Earnings per share computation


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended
                                               September 30,       September 30,
                                             ------------------  -----------------
                                              (in thousands except per share data)

                                               1996      1995      1996      1995
                                               ----      ----      ----      ----

<S>                                          <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income (loss)                            $ 6,445   $  (439)  $14,976   $   549
                                             =======   =======   =======   =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding    13,247     10,911   11,879    10,905

Weighted average common share equivalents
   assumed issued from Excess Benefit Plan        42        114       75       123

Weighted average common share equivalents
   assumed issued from exercise of warrants
   and stock options                              93         89      107        58

Weighted average common share equivalents
   assumed issued as part of Employee
   Compensation Plans                             61        167       57       100
                                             -------   --------  -------   -------

Weighted average common shares and
   equivalents outstanding                    13,443     11,281   12,118    11,186
                                             =======   ========  =======   =======

Net income (loss) per share                  $  0.48   $  (0.04) $  1.24   $  0.05
                                             =======   ========  =======   =======
</TABLE>


Earnings per share computed on both the primary and fully diluted bases are the
same.


                                  Exhibit 11.1
ROBERT MCKINNON, III

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3400

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Robert McKinnon, III, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ.

, CONCUR.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2.3.6













AMENDMENT
TO THE CONSOLIDATED EDISON
COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN
As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009















Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Consolidated Edison Inc. and the Board of Trustees of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., at a meeting duly held on November 15, 2018, the undersigned hereby approves the following amendments to the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Income Plan, (the “Plan”) effective January 1, 2019.


		
	1.
	Section 2.02(a)(iii) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 




		
	(iii) 
	as if the definition of “compensation” (or term of similar import) used for purposes of determining an Eligible Employee's pension benefit under the Retirement Plan included (1) any Basic Salary Deferrals or Supplemental Salary Deferrals under the Deferred Income Plan, (2) any Incentive Award credited on the Participant's behalf under the Executive Incentive Plan or the 2005 EIP (as applicable) and (3) solely with respect to CEB Officers (as defined in the Retirement Plan), the amount of any Annual Variable Pay Award (as defined in the Retirement Plan) made in 2017 or 2018 in excess of 25% but no more than 36% of each applicable CEB Officer’s rate of base annual salary or pay in effect as of December 31st of the Plan Year prior to the Plan Year in which the award is paid; provided, however, that:






Except as hereby amended, all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this 20th day of December, 2019.




CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.


/s/ Nancy Shannon
Nancy Shannon
Vice President of Human Resources of 
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group Biomedical; Research Review Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         October 20-21, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue,  Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Philippe Marmillot, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism,  635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3045,  Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-2861,                         *marmillotp@mail.nih.gov*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol  Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272,  Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273,  Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National  Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: July 31, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E8-18251 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Flavio Silverio PEREZ; Gloria Maria Lopez; Miguel Perez-Lopez, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 02-70485. INS Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXXXXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 20, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and denies Petitioners' request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Flavio Silverio Perez, his common law wife Gloria Maria Lopez, and their son Miguel Perez-Lopez, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. Because the transitional rules apply, *see Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), we have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s determination that an applicant has not established eligibility for asylum, and must uphold the IJ’s decision unless the evidence compels a contrary result. *Sangha v. INS,*103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997). We deny the petition.

Perez presented evidence that Sendero Luminoso guerillas targeted him and his family because he was a successful businessman and because he refused to transport a package for the guerillas. However, neither Perez nor Lopez testified that they conveyed any religious or political opinion to the guerillas, *see Alonzo v. INS,*915 F.2d 546, 548 (9th Cir.1990), and the record does not compel the conclusion that guerillas imputed any such opinion to them, *see Sangha,*103 F.3d. at 1488-89. Accordingly, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s conclusion that petitioners failed to demonstrate that guerillas persecuted them for any reason other than economic extortion or forced collaboration, which is insufficient to establish eligibility for asylum. *See id.*at 1486-87; *cf. Borja v. INS,*175 F.3d 732, 736 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s conclusion that petitioners failed to establish an objectively well-founded fear of persecution on account of an enumerated ground. *See Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425,1431 (9th Cir.1995).

Because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, they necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of deportation. *See id.*at 1429.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED’

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                                 TRANSTAR, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       For the year ended December 31,
                                                        ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1997          1996         1995          1994          1993
                                                         ----          ----         ----          ----          ----
<S>                                                     <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Income before income taxes,
  extraordinary item and change in
  accounting principle ............................     $110,579     $103,714     $ 93,915     $ 86,102     $25,976

Fixed charges:

Interest expense and amortization of
  debt issuance costs .............................     $ 17,358     $ 21,314     $ 24,144     $ 25,253     $47,838
Interest expense on rentals .......................        7,976        7,854        6,057        6,225       6,956
                                                        --------     --------     --------     --------     -------
       Total fixed charges ........................     $ 25,334     $ 29,168     $ 30,201     $ 31,478     $54,794
                                                        ========     ========     ========     ========     =======
Earnings before income taxes,
  extraordinary item, change in
  accounting principle and fixed
  charges .........................................     $135,913     $132,882     $124,116     $117,580     $80,770
                                                        ========     ========     ========     ========     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ................         5.36         4.56         4.11         3.74        1.47
                                                        ========     ========     ========     ========     =======
</TABLE>

----------

Income for the years 1993, 1994, 1996 and 1997 includes non-recurring charges
(credits) of $17.3 million $(1.7) million, $(1.0) million, and $7.0 million,
respectively.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 653

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White

Plains, New York, as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mr. ENGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White Plains, New York, as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse under construction at

5 300 Quarropas Street in White Plains, New York, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall

7 United States Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United
2

•HR 653 IH

1 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Thurgood Marshall United States

3 Courthouse’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 423 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 423

To amend subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act to establish safety 
  zones around Federal prisons in which certain facilities may not be 
                               permitted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 1995

 Mr. Clinger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act to establish safety 
  zones around Federal prisons in which certain facilities may not be 
                               permitted.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR TSD FACILITIES NEAR FEDERAL PRISONS.

    Section 3005 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act is amended by adding 
the following new subsection at the end thereof:
    ``(k) Facilities Near Federal Prisons.--(1) After the date of the 
enactment of this subsection, no permit may be issued under this 
section for the operation of any new off site hazardous waste 
incinerator, or any other new off site hazardous waste treatment, 
storage, or disposal facility if--
            ``(A) such incinerator or other facility is located within 
        a 2-mile radius of the facility boundary of any Federal prison, 
        and
            ``(B) an accident, such as a spill, explosion, or 
        accidental release of hazardous substances, at such incinerator 
        or other facility could require evacuation of prisoners or 
        other nearby residents.
    ``(2) As used in this subsection, the terms `new off site hazardous 
waste incinerator' and `new off site hazardous waste treatment, 
storage, or disposal facility' mean an incinerator or hazardous waste 
treatment, storage, or disposal facility--
            ``(A) which accepts hazardous waste that is not generated 
        at the site at which such incinerator or other facility is 
        located, and
            ``(B) for which a permit under this section is issued after 
        the date of enactment of this subsection.
Such terms shall not include any facility existing on such date of 
enactment.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-K Rule 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  /s/

Barry L.
    PennypackerBarry L. Pennypacker
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Gardner Denver, Inc.
    February 26, 2010
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Midas Medici Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Johnson Kachidza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: August 15, 2011
By:
/s/ Johnson KachidzaJohnson Kachidza

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,226,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 72,996,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,518,468
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,387,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,483,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     39,261,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       462,553
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,099,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,483,325
<SALES>                                     28,532,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,415,343
<CGS>                                       25,704,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,834,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,915,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,375,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,375,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,375,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.51)


</TABLE>
OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
          EXHIBIT 11.    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

For the three and six months
ended April 30, 1998 and 1997
(Amounts in thousands,
  except per share amounts)
                                         THREE MONTHS         SIX MONTHS
                                       1998       1997        1998     1997
BASIC SHARES:
Average common shares outstanding    10,903     10,069     10,767    9,927
                                     ======     ======     ======    =====

Net income                           $3,049     $1,513     $4,645   $2,420
Less dividend on preferred stock       (125)      (187)      (250)    (427)
                                     ------     ------     ------   ------
Net income applicable
  to common stock                    $2,924     $1,326     $4,395   $1,993
                                     ======     ======     ======   ======

Net income per
  common share, basic                 $0.27      $0.13      $0.41    $0.20
                                     ======     ======     ======   ======
DILUTED SHARES:

Average common shares
  outstanding                        10,903     10,069    10,767    9,927
Dilutive effect of employee
  stock options                         650        341       711      365
Potential dilution of
  preferred stock                      *           *          *        *
                                     ------     ------    ------   ------
                                     11,553     10,410    11,478   10,292
                                     ======     ======    ======   =====
Net income applicable
  to common stock                     $2,924     $1,326   $4,395   $1,993
Add back dividend on                  ======     ======   ======   ======
  preferred stock                      *           *          *       *
                                      ------     ------   ------   ------
Net income for calculating
 diluted earnings per share           $2,924     $1,326   $4,395   $1,993
                                      ======     ======   ======   ======
Net income per share, diluted          $0.25      $0.13    $0.38    $0.19
                                      ======     ======   ======   ======

*ANTI-DILUTIVE
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this  Registration  Statement of
Imatel Holdings,  Inc.  formerly  Development  Bancorp,  Ltd. on Form S-8 of our
report  dated  March 5, 1998  appearing  in the annual  Report of From 10-KSB of
Imatel Holdings,  Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997 and to the reference
to us under  the  heading  "Experts"  in the  Prospectus,  which is part of this
Registration Statement.


Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.
April 23, 1998