Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 49219 

• Santa Barbara Central Public 

Library, 40 East Anapamu Street, Santa 

Barbara, CA 93101. 

• Goleta Public Library, 500 North 

Fairview Avenue, Goleta, CA 93117. 

• COMB office, 3301 Laurel Canyon 

Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93105–2017. 

Special Assistance for Public Meetings 

If special assistance is required at the 

public meeting, please contact Mr. Brett 

Gray, COMB, at 805–687–4401, or at 

bgray@cachuma-board.org, no less than 

five working days before the meeting to 

allow Reclamation/COMB to secure the 

needed services. If a request cannot be 

honored, the requestor will be notified. 

Public Disclosure 

Before including your name, address, 

phone number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: July 11, 2008. 

Donald R. Glaser, 

Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region. 

[FR Doc. E8–19246 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–596] 

In the Matter of Certain GPS Chips, 

Associated Software and Systems, and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review a 

Final Determination Finding No 

Violation of Section 337 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) issued on June 13, 

2008 finding no violation of section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

in the above-captioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on March 13, 2007, based on a 

complaint filed by SiRF Technology, 

Inc. (‘‘SiRF’’) of San Jose, California. 72 

FR 11378 (March 13, 2007). The 

complaint alleged violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1337) in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain GPS chips, 

associated software and systems, and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of 

United States Patent Nos. 6,304,216 

(‘‘the ’216 patent’’); 7,043,363 (‘‘the ’363 

patent’’); 7,091,904 (‘‘the ’904 patent’’); 

and 7,132,980 (‘‘the ’980 patent’’). The 

complaint named as respondent Global 

Locate, Inc. of San Jose, California 

(‘‘Global Locate’’). The complaint and 

notice of investigation were later 

amended to include one additional 

claim of the ’904 patent. Subsequently, 

the investigation was terminated with 

respect to the ’904 patent, the ’980 

patent, and certain claims of the ’216 

and the ’363 patents, and the complaint 

and notice of investigation were 

amended to add Broadcom, Inc. of 

Irvine, California (‘‘Broadcom’’) as a 

respondent to the investigation. 

On March 13, 2008, the Commission 

determined not to review an ID issued 

by the ALJ granting in part SiRF’s 

motion for summary determination that 

it had satisfied the importation 

requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1337. On 

March 20, 2008, the Commission further 

determined not to review an ID issued 

by the ALJ granting SiRF’s motion for 

summary determination that it had 

satisfied the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. 

On June 13, 2008, the ALJ issued his 

final ID finding no violation of section 

337 by respondents Global Locate and 

Broadcom. The ID included the ALJ’s 

recommended determination on remedy 

and bonding. In the subject ID, the ALJ 

found that Global Locate’s products do 

not infringe asserted claims 1, 6, 10–12, 

17–19, 64, 65, 69, 70, 72, or 73 of the 

’216 patent. The ALJ also found that the 

asserted claims are not invalid as 

anticipated by any prior art. The ALJ 

further found that SiRF failed to prove 

that a domestic industry exists for 

articles protected by the ’216 patent. In 

addition, the ALJ found that Global 

Locate’s products do not infringe 

asserted claims 7, 8, 10–12, 16, and 18–

20 of the ’363 patent. The ALJ also 

found that the asserted claims of the 

’363 patent are invalid as anticipated by 

each of the GPS Builder System and the 

First GPS system. The ALJ further found 

that SiRF has established that a 

domestic industry exists for articles 

protected by the ’363 patent. 

On June 27, 2008, SiRF filed a 

petition for review seeking review of the 

ALJ’s ID with respect to the ’216 patent. 

Also on June 27, 2008, Global Locate 

filed a contingent petition for review, 

seeking review of certain aspects of the 

ALJ’s findings concerning both the ’216 

and ’363 patents. On July 7, 2008, 

Global Locate filed an opposition to 

SiRF’s petition for review and SiRF filed 

a response to Global Locate’s contingent 

petition for review. Also on July 7, 2008, 

the Commission Investigative Attorney 

filed a response to both SiRF’s petition 

and Global Locate’s contingent petition. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID, the petitions for review, and the 

responses thereto, the Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 14, 2008. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–19209 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142 

(Final)] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From 

China, South Africa, and Vietnam 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES