alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, F. William Weber, Chief Executive Officer (Principal ExecutiveOfficer), certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WebcoIndustries, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:        a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;        b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and        c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):        a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and        b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: October 28, 2004

/s/ F. William Weber F. William WeberChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Koppers
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an
officer of Koppers Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/S/ WALTER W. TURNER    |  | /S/ BRIAN H. MCCURRIE  
|Walter W. Turner        |  | Brian H. McCurrie      
|Chief Executive Officer |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                        | 
|February 18, 2009       |  | February 18, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11272]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 7.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of  Iowa (FEMA—1763—DR), dated 05/27/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         05/25/2008 and continuing.                    

*Effective Date:*                         08/12/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/28/2008.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/27/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Iowa, dated 05/27/2008, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Cherokee.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

James E Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-19234 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Banque Commerciale de Bale, Respondent, v. Robert B. MacLea Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### Gertrude E. Childs, by Arthur S. Westfall, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Irving W. Childs, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements'. Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Pantry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Daniel J. Kelly, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    DANIEL J. KELLYDaniel J. KellyVice President andChief Financial OfficerDate: December 14, 2004




This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or
after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
No. 72-6009.

#### Shorter *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement Nos. 333-134014, 333-132008, 333-124900, 333-118646, 333-118647, 333-99337, 333-68387, 333-48969, 333-35193, 333-24621, 33-90976, and 33-74780 on Form S-8 of ourreport dated February 26, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Health Net Inc., and the effectiveness of Health Net, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Health Net, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

February 26, 2010
Exhibit 10.35

LOGO

February 1st, 2011

Dror Levy

Subject: Update to your Employment Agreement dated
June 9th, 2002

Dear Dror,

The notice
peiod as defined in section 3a of your employement agreement dated June 9th, 2002 shall be increased to five (5) months from one (1) month previously.

All other
terms and conditions of the current employment agreement (including the Companys procedures as amended from time to time) remain unchanged and shall apply.



Best Regards,Tali ChenCorporate Vice PresidentHuman Resources


2580 North First Street, Suite 460

San Jose, CA 95131
#### Mehari Gilamariam NEGUSSE, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Respondents.

No. 02-1769.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 18, 2003.

Decided March 26, 2003.

Jeffrey Kantor, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, John C. Cunningham, Senior Litigation, Shelley R. Goad, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Mehari Gilamariam Negusse, a native and citizen of Eritrea, seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal.* We reject Negusse’s challenge to the summary affirmance without opinion procedure au*604thorized in 8 C.F.R. 8.1(a)(7) (2002). *See Albathani v. INS,*318 F.3d 365, 376-79 (1st Cir.2003).

The decision to grant or deny asylum relief is conclusive “unless manifestly contrary to the law and an abuse of discretion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(D) (2000). We conclude that the record supports the IJ’s conclusion that Negusse failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. *See*8 C.F.R. § 208.13(a) (2002); *Gonahasa v. INS,*181 F.3d 538, 541 (4th Cir.1999). As the decision in this case is not manifestly contrary to law, we cannot grant the relief Negusse seeks.

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 As Negusse does not argue withholding of removal on appeal, we do not address it.
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
                Name of Subsidiary                       Jurisdiction
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
           Electric Fuel (E.F.L.) Ltd.                      Israel
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
                Electric Fuel B.V.                       Netherlands
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
                Electric Fuel GmbH                         Germany
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
             Electric Fuel (UK) Ltd.                    United Kingdom
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
        Electric Fuel Transportation Corp.                 Delaware
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
            Instant Power Corporation                      Delaware
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
          IES Interactive Training, Inc.                   Delaware
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
          I.E.S. Defense Services, Inc.                    Delaware
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
            MDT Protective Industries                       Israel
--------------------------------------------------- -----------------------




<PAGE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 11.1


                            ParcPlace-Digitalk, Inc.

             STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Year Ended March 31,
                                            -----------------------------------
                                              1997          1996         1995
                                            ---------    ---------     --------
<S>                                         <C>          <C>           <C>
Net (loss) income                           $(22,480)    $(10,396)     $ 4,564
Accretion on preferred stock                                  135          340
                                            --------     --------      -------
Net (loss) income applicable to 
  common shareholders                       $(22,480)    $(10,531)     $ 4,224
                                            ========     =========     =======

Computations of weighted average
  common and common equivalent
  shares outstanding:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding*                              11,775       10,725        9,688

Common equivalent shares 
  attributable to:
  Stock options and warrants (treasury
    stock method)*                                --           --        1,312
                                            --------     --------      -------  
Shares used in computing net (loss)
  income per share                            11,775       10,725       11,000
                                            ========     ========      =======

Net (loss) income per share                 $  (1.91)    $  (0.98)     $  0.38
                                            ========     ========      =======
</TABLE>

*Share amounts reflect August 30, 1995 merger with Digitalk, Inc.
1994 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

8-12-1994

Miller v. Cigna Corporation

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 93-1773

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1994 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Miller v. Cigna Corporation" (1994). 1994 Decisions. Paper 108.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1994/108
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 _______________ 

 NO. 93-1773 

 _______________ 

 WILLIAM J. MILLER, 

 Appellant

v. 

 CIGNA CORPORATION; 

 THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 

 _______________ 

Present: SLOVITER, Chief Judge, BECKER, STAPLETON, MANSMANN, 

 GREENBERG, HUTCHINSON, SCIRICA, COWEN, NYGAARD, ALITO, 

 ROTH, LEWIS and McKEE, Circuit Judges. 

 O R D E R

 A majority of the active judges having voted for 

rehearing in banc in the above appeal, it is 

 O R D E R E D that the Clerk of this Court vacate the 

panel's opinion and judgment filed June 28, 1994, and list the 

above case for rehearing in banc at the convenience of the court. 

 By the Court, 

 /s/ Dolores K. Sloviter 

 

 Chief Judge 

Dated:August 12, l994
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.44


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the January 9, 2018 Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) between Samer Halawi (the “Executive”) and Intelsat US LLC (formerly known as Intelsat Corporation) is entered into by the undersigned parties.


WHEREAS, effective July 2, 2018, Intelsat Corporation was converted into a limited liability company and was renamed Intelsat US LLC (the “Conversion”); and


WHEREAS, as a result of the Conversion, the name of Executive’s employer is Intelsat US LLC, and all references in the Employment Agreement to the Company are deemed to refer to Intelsat US LLC.


NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows
		
	1.
	Effective as of the date of the Conversion, the name of Executive’s employer is Intelsat US LLC, and all references in the Employment Agreement to the Company shall be deemed to refer to Intelsat US LLC.  


		
	2.
	As amended and modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




		
	3.
	If there is any conflict between the terms of the Employment Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail. 










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of December 28, 2018.




INTELSAT US LLC




By:     /s/ Michelle V. Bryan
Name: Michelle V. Bryan
Title: Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary






THE EXECUTIVE


/s/ Samer Halawi
Samer Halawi
#### John P. Taylor v. State.

No. 24842.

June 21, 1950.

*Ward & Benson,*by *L. F. Benson,*Mt. Pleasant, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with a motor vehicle as defined in Art. 1149, Vernon’s Ann. P.C., and his punishment was assessed by the jury at 60 days in jail and a fine of $200.00.

The proceedings appear to be regular. No bills of exception or statement of facts are found in the record.

Appellant, by motion for certiorari, seeks to have a statement of facts brought up from the trial court, or in the alternative, to have the judgment reversed.

On December 23, 1949, appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled, and he gave notice of appeal. The order grants “full statutory time to perfect appeal.”

On the same day, appellant filed his affidavit of inability to pay the costs, and requested that he be furnished a statement of facts. On March 18, 1950, appellant filed a second request that he be provided with a statement of facts, and on the same day the trial judge entered this order overruling such request.

*96Appellant attaches to his motion a statement of the evidence as prepared by him, which he says was not completed until after the expiration of 90 days from the date of his notice of appeal. This statement of the evidence he says he sent to the clerk “for approval of the trial judge and then to be filed with said papers in said cause.”

The burden was upon appellant to first prepare what he understood to be a statement of the facts in the case and present same for approval, and until he does so there is nothing for state’s counsel or the court to do in the matter.

Being a misdemeanor case, the court reporter was not obliged to furnish a statement of facts, nor was the trial judge under the duty to prepare or furnish such statement. See Jones v. State, 149 Tex. Cr. R. 594, 194 S.W. 2d 766.

But appellant, through his attorney, avers that they were diligent in the matter and that appellant has been deprived of a statement of facts through no fault of his own or that of his attorney; that he was promised by the judge and the assistant county attorney on December 23, 1949, that the statement of facts would be prepared and furnished to appellant’s attorney in ample time to prepare the appeal.

We are unable to agree that diligence is shown, or that appellant is without fault in the matter. It is not shown that the statement could not have been prepared after the overruling of appellant’s second motion on March 17, 1950, and prior to the expiration of the time allowed for its filing. Nor is it shown that a statement of facts was ever presented by appellant to the state’s attorney or the trial judge for approval.

There being no statement of facts on file with the clerk of the trial court, certiorari would avail nothing.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### Irving W. Childs, Appellant, v. Gertrude E. Childs, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.