alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>         5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               1,241,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                94,000
<INVENTORY>                                 2,939,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            4,206,000
<PP&E>                                      173,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              926,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              6,413,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,750,000
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    15,800,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (14,520,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                6,413,000
<SALES>                                     9,643,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            9,643,000
<CGS>                                       5,205,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               9,634,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            102,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          199,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (292,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (294,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                (294,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor
         International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June
         30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
         date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert A. Levinson, Chief Executive
         Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:   August 15, 2005
         ---------------

By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    ----------------------------
    Robert A. Levinson
    Chief Executive Officer

                                    Page 37
#### Tony ACOSTA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEMOCRATIC PARISH COMMITTEE OF ST. BERNARD PARISH et al., Defendants and Appellees.

No. 16304.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 5, 1935.

J. Bernard Cocke and Bertrand I. Cahn, both of New Orleans, for appellants.

Lawrence W. Bergeron and John R. Perez, both of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It is conceded by counsel that the issues presanted here cannot be distinguished from those which confronted the Supreme Court in tire matter entitled Paul Adolph Brown v. Democratic Parish Committee of St. Bernard Parish et al., 165 So. 167, and in various other cases decided by the Supreme Court in the same opinion and decree rendered in the Brown Case on December 3, 1935.

For the reasons assigned by the Supreme Court in that case, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,200
<INVENTORY>                                     95,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,500
<PP&E>                                         334,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 481,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           88,600
<BONDS>                                        186,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   481,600
<SALES>                                        670,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               670,600
<CGS>                                          555,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  623,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.85
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of BLS Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation
        (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Brittany Prager, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
        best
        of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        BLS Media, Inc., and will be retained by BLS Media, Inc. and furnished to
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/
                  Brittany
                  PragerBrittany
                  PragerChief
                  Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    432,457
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               527,157
<PP&E>                                       2,697,514
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,010,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,213,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          644,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       415,434
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,153,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,213,855
<SALES>                                        206,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,518
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,370)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (35,796)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10013

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EARL HILTON POWERS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:94-CR-80-Y(1) 

- - - - - - - - - -

June 30, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Earl Hilton Powers has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found

no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from the

further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. The

dismissal is without prejudice as to Powers' potential challenge

to the Bureau of Prison's calculation of credit for prior custody

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              CONSENT OF KPMG, LLP

The Board of Directors
Sonic Solutions

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-66187) on Form S-8 of Sonic Solutions of our report dated May 3, 2001,
except as to note 6, which is as of June 18, 2001, relating to the balance
sheets of Sonic Solutions as of March 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2001, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2001 annual report on
Form on amendment no. 1 to Form 10-K of Sonic Solutions.


/s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California

August 8, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

DECKER TRANSPORT COMPANY,

INC., 

Defendant.

/

Case No. 09-13116

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order entered and filed on this date,

judgment is entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff and the case is

DISMISSED.

DAVID WEAVER

Dated: February 25, 2011 By: s/Julie Owens 

 Deputy Clerk

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, February 25, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 

2:09-cv-13116-AC-MJH Doc # 40 Filed 02/25/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 753
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of Equity Inns, Inc. on Form S-3 (Files No. 33-90364, 333-47761,
333-117421, 333-63253, 333-117421, 333-128981, 333-25013 and 333-25017) of our
report dated March 15, 2006, relating to the financial statements, financial
statement schedules, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
March 15, 2006
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Auditor



We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated January 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Koppers Industries, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002 in the following Registration Statements:



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-59121 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Koppers Industries, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-39478 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Koppers Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Koppers Industries, Inc. 1997 Stock Option
Plan and the Koppers Industries, Inc. Restated and Amended Stock Option Plan;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Registration Statement No. 333-39486 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee Savings Plan of Koppers Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the Koppers Industries,
Inc. Savings Plan for Union Hourly Employees.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/  Ernst & Young LLP




Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

March 5, 2003
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jerome L. Banks, Jr., Appellant. U.S. Delivery Contemporary, Respondent; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[678 NYS2d 411]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 9, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was terminated from his employment as an internal messenger for a delivery service after he approached a female employee of a client and requested a hug and a kiss. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied claimant’s application for benefits, finding that he was terminated for misconduct. Claimant admitted that he knew that his conduct was inappropriate but testified that he merely wanted to thank the woman for a Christmas card she had sent and wish her a happy holiday. In view of the fact that claimant’s behavior was detrimental to the employer’s interest and evinces a disregard for the standards of conduct that the employer had a reasonable right to expect from him as an employee, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct *(see, Matter of Punter [Ross],*43 NY2d 743; *Matter of Krupa [Sweeney],*236 AD2d 772; *Matter of Rohnke [Hudacs],*192 AD2d 812).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 642

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified credit

against estate and gift taxes to an amount equivalent to a $1,000,000

exclusion.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mr. STUMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the unified credit against estate and gift taxes to an

amount equivalent to a $1,000,000 exclusion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN UNIFIED ESTATE AND GIFT TAX

4 CREDIT.

5 (a) ESTATE TAX CREDIT.—

6 (1) Subsection (a) of section 2010 of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to unified credit

8 against estate tax) is amended by striking

9 ‘‘$192,800’’ and inserting ‘‘$345,800’’.
2

•HR 642 IH

1 (2) Paragraph (2) of section 2001(c) of such

2 Code is amended by striking ‘‘$21,040,000’’ and in3 serting ‘‘the amount at which the effective tax rate

4 under this section is 55 percent’’.

5 (3) Subparagraph (A) of section 2102(c)(3) of

6 such Code is amended by striking ‘‘$192,800’’ and

7 inserting ‘‘$345,800’’.

8 (4) Paragraph (1) of section 6018(a) of such

9 Code is amended by striking ‘‘$600,000’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘$1,000,000’’.

11 (b) UNIFIED GIFT TAX CREDIT.—Paragraph (1) of

12 section 2505(a) of such Code is amended by striking

13 ‘‘$192,800’’ and inserting ‘‘$345,800’’.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 this section shall apply to the estates of decedents dying,

16 and gifts made, after December 31, 1995.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 691

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the 25 percent

deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals

for 1994 and to provide an 80 percent deduction for such costs beginning

in 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1995

Mr. CARDIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the 25 percent deduction for the health insurance costs

of self-employed individuals for 1994 and to provide an

80 percent deduction for such costs beginning in 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS

4 OF SELF-EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS.

5 (a) DEDUCTION MADE PERMANENT; 25 PERCENT

6 DEDUCTION FOR TAXABLE YEARS BEGINNING IN 1994.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (l) of section 162

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to
2

•HR 691 IH

1 special rules for health insurance costs of self-em2 ployed individuals) is amended by striking paragraph

3 (6).

4 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

5 by paragraph (1) shall apply to taxable years begin6 ning after December 31, 1993.

7 (b) DEDUCTION INCREASED TO 80 PERCENT.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section

9 162(l) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘25 per10 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘80 percent’’.

11 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

12 by paragraph (1) shall apply to taxable years begin13 ning after December 31, 1994.

Æ
#### Michael Allen BERRY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-6910.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 14, 2003.

Decided Aug. 22, 2003.

Michael Allen Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Allen Berry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. Berry cannot appeal this order unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate of appealability, and a certificate of appealability will not issue absent a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A habeas appellant meets this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Berry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### Irwin William Barrow v. State

No. 25586.

December 19, 1951.

Hon. Willis M. McGregor, Judge Presiding.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

*524WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for burglary, and the jury having found that he had been previously convicted of the prior offense of burglary charged in the indictment, he was sentenced to serve 12 years in the penitentiary.

Appellant was found in the nighttime in a building owned by J. R. Hitri. The lock on the front door had been broken, and appellant had a wrecking bar in his hands.

The previous conviction for burglary charged in the indictment was admitted by appellant, and established by the state’s evidence.

Appellant denied that he was in the building of Mr. Hitri, but the jury elected to accept the officer’s testimony that he was found there.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record.

All proceedings appear to be regular and the evidence sustains the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc. (the Company) for the six months ended June 30, 2004, I, Gary N. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; provided, however, that the Company did not obtain a review of the
unaudited interim financial statements in the Report by an independent registered public accounting firm as indicated in Part I, Item 1 of the Report; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gary N. Thompson                        
|Gary N. Thompson                            
|Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                                            
|Acceptance Insurance Companies Inc.         
|                                            
|Date: August 10, 2004