49218 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 

Comments, including names and 

street addresses of respondents, will be 

available for public review at the Forest 

Supervisor’s Office, Black Hills National 

Forest, 1019 North 5th Street, Custer, 

South Dakota 57730, during regular 

business hours. 

Individual respondents may request 

confidentiality. Before including your 

address, phone number, e-mail address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, be 

advised that your entire comment—

including your personal identifying 

information—may be made publicly 

available at any time. While you can ask 

us in your comment to withhold from 

public review your personal identifying 

information, we cannot guarantee that 

we will be able to do so. If you wish to 

withhold your name or address from 

public review or from disclosure under 

the Freedom of Information Act, you 

must state this prominently at the 

beginning of your comments. Such 

requests will be honored to the extent 

allowed by law. All submissions from 

organizations or businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organization or businesses, will be made 

available for public inspection in their 

entirety. 

Notice is hereby given that an 

opportunity for a public meeting is 

afforded in connection with the 

proposed withdrawal. All interested 

persons who desire a public meeting for 

the purpose of being heard on the 

proposed withdrawal must submit a 

written request to the Forest 

Supervisor’s Office within 90 days from 

the date of publication of this notice. 

Upon determination by the authorized 

officer that a public meeting will be 

held, a notice of the time and place will 

be published in the Federal Register at 

least 30 days before the scheduled date 

of the meeting. 

For a period of two years from the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, the land will be 

segregated from location or entry under 

the United States mining laws, unless 

the application is denied or canceled or 

the withdrawal is approved prior to that 

date. The land will remain open to other 

uses within the statutory authority 

pertinent to National Forest lands and 

subject to discretionary approval. 

The application will be processed in 

accordance with the regulations set 

forth in 43 CFR 2300. 

Authority: 43 CFR 2310.3–1(b). 

Dated: August 12, 2008. 

Theresa M. Hanley, 

Deputy State Director, Division of Resources. 

[FR Doc. E8–19262 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

South Coast Conduit/Upper Reach 

Reliability Project, Santa Barbara 

County, CA 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of availability and notice 

of public meeting for the draft 

Environmental Impact Statement/ 

Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR). 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation 

(Reclamation) is the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

Federal lead agency and the Cachuma 

Operation and Maintenance Board 

(COMB) is the California Environmental 

Quality Act (CEQA) State lead agency. 

Together, these agencies have made 

available for public review and 

comment the draft EIS/EIR. 

The South Coast Conduit (SCC)/ 

Upper Reach Project involves 

installation of a second water pipeline 

for improving water supply reliability to 

Cachuma Project (CP) and State Water 

Project (SWP) customers on the south 

coast of Santa Barbara County. This 

draft EIS/EIR addresses changes to the 

physical, natural, and human 

environment that would occur as a 

result of installing and operating the 

second pipeline. 

DATES: Submit written comments on the 

draft environmental document on or 

before October 3, 2008. 

A public meeting will be held on 

September 10, 2008 from 6 p.m. to 8 

p.m. in Santa Barbara, CA to discuss the 

purpose and content of the draft 

environmental document and to provide 

the public an opportunity to comment 

on the draft environmental document. 

Written comments will be accepted at 

the public meeting. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments on 

the draft EIS/EIR to Ms. Judi Tapia, 

Bureau of Reclamation, 1243 ‘N’ Street, 

Fresno, CA 93721–1831, or Mr. Brett 

Gray, Cachuma Operation and 

Maintenance Board, 3301 Laurel 

Canyon Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93105–

2017. 

The public meeting will be held at the 

COMB office, 3301 Laurel Canyon Road, 

Santa Barbara, CA. 

Copies of the draft document may be 

requested from Ms. Judi Tapia at 1243 

‘N’ Street, Fresno, CA 93721–1831, or at 

jtapia@mp.usbr.gov, or from Mr. Brett 

Gray, COMB, 3301 Laurel Canyon Road, 

Santa Barbara, CA 93105, or at 

bgray@cachuma-board.org. 

The draft EIS/EIR is also accessible 

from the following Web sites: http:// 

www.usbr.gov/mp/nepa/index.cfm or 

http://www.comb.org. See 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 

locations where copies of the draft EIS/ 

EIR are available. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Judi Tapia, Bureau of Reclamation, at 

559–487–5138, TDD 559–487–5933, or 

Mr. Brett Gray, COMB, at 805–687–

4401. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

existing SCC/Upper Reach pipeline 

provides approximately 80 percent of 

the water supply for communities along 

the South Coast of Santa Barbara 

County. Reclamation owns the SCC 

facilities and COMB manages the 

facilities under a Transfer of Operations 

and Maintenance Contract with 

Reclamation. The SCC operates at 

capacity for extended periods of time, 

and during peak demands it is not able 

to provide the water needed. No 

redundant supply or pipeline exists to 

convey CP or SWP water to the South 

Coast if the Upper Reach of the SCC is 

out of service due to scheduled and/or 

unexpected repairs. The proposed 

project would increase the operational 

flexibility, reliability, and conveyance 

capacity of the SCC between the South 

Portal of Tecolote Tunnel and the 

Corona Del Mar Water Treatment Plant 

to accommodate peak demand levels 

and to allow maintenance of one 

pipeline while the other is operational. 

The total amount of water delivered per 

year, however, would not increase. 

The draft EIS/EIR considers the direct, 

indirect, and cumulative effects on the 

physical, natural, and human 

environment that may result from the 

construction and operation of the SCC/ 

Upper Reach second pipeline. The draft 

EIS/EIR addresses potentially significant 

environmental issues and recommends 

adequate and feasible mitigation 

measures to reduce or eliminate 

significant environmental impacts, 

where possible. Two alternative 

pipeline alignments as well as no 

project and no action alternatives are 

addressed. 

Copies of the draft EIS/EIR are 

available for public review at the 

following locations: 

• Bureau of Reclamation, SouthCentral California Area Office, 1243 ‘N’

Street, Fresno, CA 93721–1831. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 20, 2008 / Notices 49219 

• Santa Barbara Central Public 

Library, 40 East Anapamu Street, Santa 

Barbara, CA 93101. 

• Goleta Public Library, 500 North 

Fairview Avenue, Goleta, CA 93117. 

• COMB office, 3301 Laurel Canyon 

Road, Santa Barbara, CA 93105–2017. 

Special Assistance for Public Meetings 

If special assistance is required at the 

public meeting, please contact Mr. Brett 

Gray, COMB, at 805–687–4401, or at 

bgray@cachuma-board.org, no less than 

five working days before the meeting to 

allow Reclamation/COMB to secure the 

needed services. If a request cannot be 

honored, the requestor will be notified. 

Public Disclosure 

Before including your name, address, 

phone number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: July 11, 2008. 

Donald R. Glaser, 

Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region. 

[FR Doc. E8–19246 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–596] 

In the Matter of Certain GPS Chips, 

Associated Software and Systems, and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review a 

Final Determination Finding No 

Violation of Section 337 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial 

determination (‘‘ID’’) issued on June 13, 

2008 finding no violation of section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

in the above-captioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on March 13, 2007, based on a 

complaint filed by SiRF Technology, 

Inc. (‘‘SiRF’’) of San Jose, California. 72 

FR 11378 (March 13, 2007). The 

complaint alleged violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1337) in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain GPS chips, 

associated software and systems, and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of 

United States Patent Nos. 6,304,216 

(‘‘the ’216 patent’’); 7,043,363 (‘‘the ’363 

patent’’); 7,091,904 (‘‘the ’904 patent’’); 

and 7,132,980 (‘‘the ’980 patent’’). The 

complaint named as respondent Global 

Locate, Inc. of San Jose, California 

(‘‘Global Locate’’). The complaint and 

notice of investigation were later 

amended to include one additional 

claim of the ’904 patent. Subsequently, 

the investigation was terminated with 

respect to the ’904 patent, the ’980 

patent, and certain claims of the ’216 

and the ’363 patents, and the complaint 

and notice of investigation were 

amended to add Broadcom, Inc. of 

Irvine, California (‘‘Broadcom’’) as a 

respondent to the investigation. 

On March 13, 2008, the Commission 

determined not to review an ID issued 

by the ALJ granting in part SiRF’s 

motion for summary determination that 

it had satisfied the importation 

requirements of 19 U.S.C. 1337. On 

March 20, 2008, the Commission further 

determined not to review an ID issued 

by the ALJ granting SiRF’s motion for 

summary determination that it had 

satisfied the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. 

On June 13, 2008, the ALJ issued his 

final ID finding no violation of section 

337 by respondents Global Locate and 

Broadcom. The ID included the ALJ’s 

recommended determination on remedy 

and bonding. In the subject ID, the ALJ 

found that Global Locate’s products do 

not infringe asserted claims 1, 6, 10–12, 

17–19, 64, 65, 69, 70, 72, or 73 of the 

’216 patent. The ALJ also found that the 

asserted claims are not invalid as 

anticipated by any prior art. The ALJ 

further found that SiRF failed to prove 

that a domestic industry exists for 

articles protected by the ’216 patent. In 

addition, the ALJ found that Global 

Locate’s products do not infringe 

asserted claims 7, 8, 10–12, 16, and 18–

20 of the ’363 patent. The ALJ also 

found that the asserted claims of the 

’363 patent are invalid as anticipated by 

each of the GPS Builder System and the 

First GPS system. The ALJ further found 

that SiRF has established that a 

domestic industry exists for articles 

protected by the ’363 patent. 

On June 27, 2008, SiRF filed a 

petition for review seeking review of the 

ALJ’s ID with respect to the ’216 patent. 

Also on June 27, 2008, Global Locate 

filed a contingent petition for review, 

seeking review of certain aspects of the 

ALJ’s findings concerning both the ’216 

and ’363 patents. On July 7, 2008, 

Global Locate filed an opposition to 

SiRF’s petition for review and SiRF filed 

a response to Global Locate’s contingent 

petition for review. Also on July 7, 2008, 

the Commission Investigative Attorney 

filed a response to both SiRF’s petition 

and Global Locate’s contingent petition. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s final 

ID, the petitions for review, and the 

responses thereto, the Commission has 

determined not to review the subject ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: August 14, 2008. 

William R. Bishop, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–19209 Filed 8–19–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142 

(Final)] 

Uncovered Innerspring Units From 

China, South Africa, and Vietnam 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 


dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES