alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.9


Summary Description of the 2019 Directors Compensation Program


Members of the Company’s Board of Directors who are not Company employees receive an annual retainer of $100,000, which is intended to cover all regularly scheduled meetings of the Board and its committees.


The Chairs of Board committees receive additional annual retainers. For the Chair of the Audit Committee, the retainer is $20,000; for the Chair of the Board Affairs and Nominating Committee, the retainer is $10,000; and for the Chair of the Compensation Committee, the retainer is $15,000. The retainer for the Lead Director is $25,000.


All independent directors also receive an annual deferred stock unit grant. The number of shares covered by each grant is equal to $145,000 (based on the 20-day average stock price as of January 31, in the year of the grant, a methodology consistent with the calculation for other executive equity awards), rounded up to the next ten-share increment. The deferred stock units are settled upon termination of service as a director. Directors may also defer their annual retainers, committee chair retainers, and meeting fees in a deferred stock unit account.


A director who is an employee of Grainger or any Grainger subsidiary does not receive any retainer fees for Board or Board committee service, Board or Board committee meeting attendance fees, or stock options or stock units under the Director Stock Plan.


Stock ownership guidelines applicable to non-employee directors were established in 1998. These guidelines provide that within five years after election, a director must own Grainger common stock and common stock equivalents having a value of at least five times the annual retainer fee for serving on the Board
#### Oscar Scherer, Respondent, v. Charles K. Leicht, Appellant, Impleaded with Peter Whitney.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No Opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Form 10-QSB for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                             15,196
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      72,911
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                     1,320,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,426,049
<PP&E>                            937,673
<DEPRECIATION>                   (884,258)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,479,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,828,445
<BONDS>                         1,002,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          987,242
<OTHER-SE>                     (2,339,023)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,479,464
<SALES>                         7,160,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  850,049
<CGS>                           6,360,423
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   7,346,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                141,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (85,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (85,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      (85,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The undersigned officer of Consorteum Holdings, Inc. (hereinafter the "Company")hereby certifies to such officer's knowledge that the Company's Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.
 
 Date:February 22, 2011
/s/ Geoffrey William SmethurstGeoffrey William SmethurstChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit 99.1
                                                             ------------

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB/A of Levcor International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert A. Levinson President and Principal
Financial Officer of Levcor, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of Levcor.


By: /s/ Robert A. Levinson
    ----------------------
Name: Robert A. Levinson
President and Principal Financial Officer
December 18, 2002
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert O. Bond, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i)   the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii)   the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   ROBERT
O. BOND


Robert O.
Bond


President
and Chief Operating Officer





November
10, 2008














This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Thomas L.
Millner, certify that this annual report on Form 10-K of Remington Arms
Company, Inc., to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. Date: March
 28, 2008
/s/ Thomas L. MillnerThomas L. MillnerChief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roosevelt Cornell SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7256.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 11, 2003.

Decided March 21, 2003.

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Roosevelt Cornell Sanders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Sanders,*Nos. CR-94-631; CA-02-993-0-10, 2002 WL 32078927 (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 23.0


<PAGE>


[S. R. SNODGRASS, A.C. LETTERHEAD]




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in this  Registration  Statement of
PHS Bancorp,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January 12, 2001 appearing in
the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of PHS  Bancorp,  Inc.  for the year  ended
December 31, 2000.


                                                   /s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, Pennsylvania

March 22, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 64

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that a reasonable 
  attorney's fee shall be awarded as a part of the cost to prevailing 
                  defendants in Federal civil actions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Livingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that a reasonable 
  attorney's fee shall be awarded as a part of the cost to prevailing 
                  defendants in Federal civil actions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Frivolous Suit Reduction Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. ATTORNEYS' FEES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 123 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1932. Attorneys' fees
    ``In any civil action in a court of the United States, the court 
shall award a prevailing defendant a reasonable attorney's fee as part 
of the costs.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 123 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``1932. Attorneys' fees.''.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 688

To extend Federal restrictions on the export of unprocessed timber to timber

harvested in the State of Texas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1995

Mr. WILSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture and, in addition, to the Committee on International

Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To extend Federal restrictions on the export of unprocessed

timber to timber harvested in the State of Texas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF FOREST RESOURCES CON4 SERVATION AND SHORTAGE RELIEF ACT OF

5 1990 TO THE ENTIRE STATE OF TEXAS.

6 (a) EXTENSION OF RESTRICTIONS.—Section 489(a)

7 of the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage Relief

8 Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620a(a)) is amended by inserting
2

•HR 688 IH

1 ‘‘or from Federal lands in the State of Texas’’ after

2 ‘‘100th meridian in the contiguous 48 States’’.

3 (b) SUBSTITUTION.—Section 490 of such Act (16

4 U.S.C. 620b) is amended—

5 (1) in subsections (a)(1), (a)(2)(D)(i), and

6 (b)(1), by inserting ‘‘or from Federal lands in the

7 State of Texas’’ after ‘‘100th meridian in the contig8 uous 48 States’’ each place it appears; and

9 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ‘‘or from

10 a sourcing area in the State of Texas’’ after ‘‘100th

11 meridian in the contiguous 48 States’’.

12 (c) MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT.—Section 492

13 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 620d) is amended in subsections

14 (a) and (b) by inserting ‘‘or from Federal lands in the

15 State of Texas’’ after ‘‘100th meridian in the contiguous

16 48 States’’ each place it appears.

17 (d) DEFINITIONS.—Section 493 of such Act (16

18 U.S.C. 620e) is amended—

19 (1) in paragraph (5), by inserting ‘‘or in the

20 State of Texas’’ after ‘‘48 States’’; and

21 (2) in paragraph (8), by inserting ‘‘or from

22 Federal lands in the State of Texas’’ after ‘‘100th

23 meridian in the contiguous 48 States’’.
3

•HR 688 IH

1 (e) TREATMENT OF WOOD CHIPS.—Section 493(7)

2 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 620e(7)) is amended by adding

3 at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(C) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B), the

5 term ‘unprocessed timber’ includes chips processed

6 from timber originating in the State of Texas.’’.

7 (f) EFFECTIVE DATE AND EFFECT OF AMEND8 MENTS.—

9 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made

10 by this section shall take effect on the date of the

11 enactment of this Act.

12 (2) EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS.—For purposes

13 of applying the amendments made by this section to

14 lands in the State of Texas not previously covered

15 by the Forest Resources Conservation and Shortage

16 Relief Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 620 et seq.), ref17 erences in such Act to the date of the enactment of

18 such Act shall be deemed to be references to the

19 date of the enactment of this section.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,797
<INVENTORY>                                     21,268
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,513
<PP&E>                                         185,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,242
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,806
<SALES>                                         72,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,810
<CGS>                                           48,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,631
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,054
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.59


January 13, 2016


SECOND Amendment to OPTION Agreement 
This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Intelsat S. A. Option Agreement (“Option Agreement”) between David McGlade (the “Participant”) and Intelsat S.A. (the “Company”), dated as of April 18, 2013, is entered into by the undersigned parties and is effective as of December 15, 2015 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).
 
WHEREAS, the undersigned parties wish to amend the Option Agreement to reflect an Exercise Price (as defined in the Option Agreement) equal to the closing price of a common share of the Company, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions reporting system for the Amendment Effective Date.
 
It is hereby agreed as follows:
 
1.                 Section 2(b) of the Option Agreement is amended to read as follows:  
“Exercise Price. The purchase price of the Shares covered by the Company Option shall be U.S. $3.77 per Share (the “Exercise Price”) (without commission or other charge).” 
2.                 As amended and modified by this Amendment, the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
3.                 If there is any conflict between the terms of the Option Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of December 15, 2015.
 
                                                                        
INTELSAT S.A. 


By: /s/ Michelle V. Bryan 
Name: Michelle V. Bryan
Title: Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer 






Accepted on January 13, 2016
 DAVID PAUL MCGLADE                                                                    




Accepted on January 13, 2016
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3931

_____________________________

TOBIAS CLEVON CARROLL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

June 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Tobias Clevon Carroll, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7254

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH R. BEILHARZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:09-cr-00105-LMB-1; 1:11-cv-01222-LMB)

Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: November 15, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph R. Beilharz, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy D. Belevetz, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Kealin M. Culbreath, Vikram 

Jagadish, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Joseph R. Beilharz seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Beilharz has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED