alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee will hold its first meeting on September 16, 2008, in Ballroom C at the L'Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC. The session will begin at 8 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. This meeting is open to the public. 

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on health care issues affecting enrolled veterans residing in rural areas. The Committee will examine programs and policies that impact the provision of VA health care to enrolled veterans residing in rural areas, and discuss ways to improve and enhance VA services for these veterans. 

                    The meeting will feature remarks and presentations by the Secretary of                           ( print page 48023)                        Veterans Affairs, the Under Secretary for Health, the Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health for Policy and Planning, VA Office of Rural Health managers and staff, and select Veterans Health Administration program offices.                 

No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee not less than 10 days in advance of the meeting to Ms. Alicia Henning, Office of Rural Health (10A5), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Ms. Henning at (202) 461-7092. 

Dated: August 12, 2008.

By Direction of the Secretary:

E. Philip Riggin, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-18977 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
#### Phillip Davis v. State

No. 25471.

December 19, 1951.

Hon. Sam Bullock, Judge Presiding.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Unlawful possession of whisky for the purpose of sale is the offense; the punishment a $500 fine and six months in jail.

Peace officers, as a result of a search of the premises of the *530appellant, found therein a quantity of whisky and other intoxicating liquor.

No defense was offered.

A bill of exception appears complaining of the receipt in evidence of the result of the search by the officers. Among the qualifications appended to the bill by the trial court was that showing that the evidence obtained as a result of the search was introduced without objection. This qualification was accepted by the appellant, and he is bound thereby. Not having objected to the introduction of the testimony, there is nothing presented by the bill for review.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of Ashraf M. Dahod and Paul J. Milbury hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer, respectively of Starent Networks, Corp. (the
"Company"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 8, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ASHRAF M. DAHODAshraf M. Dahod
President and Chief Executive Officer                 
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/PAUL J. MILBURYPaul J. Milbury
Vice President, Operations and
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q/A Report for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard J. DeGarmo


Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director


Dated: December 30, 2013
#### INDUSTRIAL LOAN & INVESTMENT CO. v. SENSENEY et al.

No. 4747.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 29, 1934.

T. A. Carter, of Alexandria, for appellants.

Morris Shapiro, of Alexandria, for appellee.

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff, who was operating a business under Act No. 7 of the Extra Session of 1928, commonly known as the “Small Loan Act,” instituted this suit against the defendants on a promissory note for $300, bearing interest at the rate of 31⁄8 per cent, per month, and providing for 20 per cent, attorney’s fees if placed in the hands of an attorney for collection.

Defendants filed an exception of no cause of action based on the contention that the note was null and void and uncollectable, for the reason that it provided for attorney’s fees in addition to the 3 1⁄8 per cent, interest per month, which was the maximum interest allowed under said act, especially section 13 thereof. The exception was overruled, and defendants answered, urging as a defense the same grounds urged in the exception.

The lower court rendered judgment, as prayed for, and defendants have appealed. Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, alleging acquiescence in the judgment by defendants.

It is clear from the record before us that defendant Senseney did not acquiesce in the judgment, and what he has paid on the judgment was collected under a fi. fa. and garnishment process. To determine whether the other defendant has acquiesced, it would require that the ease be remanded to the lower court for the talcing of testimony. We think this unnecessary and would cause unnecessary delay in a final determination of the case, which is clearly with plaintiff and appellee.

The contention of appellant is based upon the case of Foundation Finance Company, Inc., v. Robbins et al., 149 So. 166, decided by the Orleans Court of Appeal. In this case a writ of review was granted by the Supreme Court (153 So. 833), and the decision of the lower court reversed, in which decision the cases of Automobile Security Corporation v. Randazza, 17 La. App. 489, 135 So. 45, 674, and Heymann v. Mathes, 18 La. App. 403, 137 So. 871, were affirmed. The Robbins Case above referred to forever puts at rest the question raised by appellant, and holds adverse to his contention. See ease of General American Finance System, Inc., v. Senseney et al., 154 So. 56, No. 4748, decided this day by this court, in which the identical question was decided. The defendants in that case are the same as in the case at bar.

Therefore, for the reasons given in suit No. 4748, decided by us to-day, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17



                                 TRANSTAR, INC.
                         NON TAX-QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN

                            EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1994

         Transtar, Inc. shall pay a monthly amount from the general assets of
the Company to each individual whose pension benefits or survivor benefits are
limited as the result of the limitation on benefits provisions of the Transtar,
Inc. Non-Contributory Pension Plan and the Transtar, Inc. Salaried Retirement
Plan or that are required under the Internal Revenue Code. The amount payable
shall be equal to the difference between the benefits the individual actually
receives under the Pension Plan and the benefits which the individual would have
received under the Plan except for the limitation on benefits provisions and any
other limitations that are required under the Internal Revenue Code. Benefits
shall not be payable pursuant to the foregoing to or in respect of any
individual who terminates employment (other than by reason of death) prior to
attainment of age 60 without the consent of the Company.

         Except as an individual elects, prior to the earlier of retirement or
death, to have both the benefits payable to him and the benefits payable to his
survivor paid on a monthly basis or to have the benefits payable to him (but not
the benefits payable to his survivor) paid on a monthly basis, he shall receive
a lump sum distribution of both the monthly pension and monthly survivor
benefits payable. The lump sum distribution shall be equal to the present value
of the amounts payable to the individual and the individual's spouse and/or
survivor based on the joint life expectancy of said individuals, using tables
adopted by the Company, or the life expectancy of the individual's spouse and/or
survivor in the event of the employee's death prior to retirement or in the
event that employee has elected to receive his monthly benefits in the form of
an annuity but has not made the same election on behalf of his spouse and/or
survivor with respect to survivor benefits, and the applicable interest rate
established under the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation regulations to
determine the present value of annuities in the event of plan termination. Any
lump sum distribution shall be payable within 60 days following retirement, or
death, and shall represent full and final settlement of all benefits provided
hereunder.

         The Vice President-Administration is responsible for administration of
this program.

         The Company may at any time, and from time to time, by action of its
Board of Directors modify or amend, in whole or in part, or terminate any or all
of these provisions.
Exhibit 32.2

DSP GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of DSP Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dror Levy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been,
and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 16, 2010



/s/ Dror LevyDror Levy Chief Financial
Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices 

# Order

October 26, 2010

139677

WAYNE COTTRILL, Individually and as Next Friend of JEREMY COTTRILL, and SALLY COTTRILL, Plaintiffs,

and

SALLY COTTRILL as Next Friend of ANTHONY KELSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139677 COA: 285216 Genesee CC: 06-084724-NI CRAIG KENNETH SENTER, Defendant-Appellee,

and

FENTON LANES INC., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of December 21, 2 009, the application for leav e to appeal the June 23, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abey ance pending the decision in
McCormick v Carrier (Docket No. 136738). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 31, 20 10, 487 Mich ___ (2010), the appli cation is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of gr anting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the Ge nesee Circuit Court, and we REMAND this
case to the trial court for re consideration in light of McCormick

.

C ORRIGAN , J. ( concurring ).

I concur in the order remanding for reconsideration under McCormick v Carrier, 487 Mich ___ (2010), because the majority opinion in McCormick altered the criteria for determining whether an injured plaintiff meet s the serious impairment threshold in MCL 500.3135(7). But I reiterate my disagreement with the McCormick majority’s analysisI, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

d1018 2

for the reasons expressed in Justice M ARKMAN ’s dissent in that case, which I joined. I
continue to conclude that the McCormick majority misinterpreted MCL 500.3135(7), thus encouraging litigation that is expressly prohibited by the mo tor vehicle no-fault insurance act and upsetting the Legislature’ s clear intent to provide Mi chigan citizens with timely, automatic benefits for injuries sustained in auto accidents while avoiding costly, unnecessary litigation.

Y OUNG , J. ( concurring ).

Although I recognize that this Court’s decision in McCormick v Carrier , 487 Mich ___ (2010), now controls when a person may recover in tort for non-economic loss under the no-fault act, I continue to adhere to the position stated in Justice M ARKMAN ’s dissenting opinion in that case, which I joined.
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 6, 2010 |   /s/ John M. Lowber |
|-------------------|---------------------------|
|              | John M. Lowber            |
|              | Chief Financial Officer   |
|              | GCI, Inc.                 |

----
Exhibit 10.1

    

    

    

    
      Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement

      

      

      WHEREAS Galaxy Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) and Todd P. Cravens (“Employee”) are parties (the “Parties”) to an Employment Agreement
          dated July 27, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”), and that certain Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated February 21, 2019 (the Employment Agreement and Amendment No.1 are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Agreement”); and

      

      

      WHEREAS the Company and Employee desire to modify certain terms of the Agreement;

      

      

      NOW THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

      

      

      
        
          	

                	1.	
                  Section 1(a) of the Agreement shall be modified to extend the end date of the term of employment of the Employee for two (2) years, from July 27, 2020 to a new end date of July 26, 2022.

                


        

      

      

      

      
        
          	

                	2.	
                  The Employee shall be granted 225,000 Nonqualified options to purchase shares of common stock of the Company that will vest as follows: 88,000 shares on July 26, 2021; 87,000 shares on July 26, 2022; and 50,000 shares July 26, 2023. 
                    The options shall have a strike price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date this Amendment No. 2 is approved by the Board of Directors of the Company.  The options shall be subject to the terms of the
                    standard form Galaxy Gaming, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement and the Galaxy Gaming, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan.

                


        

      

      

      

      
        
          	

                	3.	
                  Employee’s annual salary shall be increased to $275,000.00 per year. The increase shall be effective as of January 1, 2020.

                


        

      

      

      

      This Amendment No. 2 shall become part of and subject to the terms of the Agreement which, except as modified hereby, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.  To the extent that the terms and conditions expressly set forth in this
        Amendment No. 2 conflict with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the terms and conditions expressly set forth in this Amendment No. 2 shall prevail.  Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 2, capitalized terms used herein shall have
        the same meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.

      

      

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 with an effective date of  February 17,
          2020.

      

      

      	
              GALAXY GAMING, INC.

            	 	
              Todd P. Cravens

            	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
              By:

            	/s/ Harry Hagerty 	 	
              By:

            	
              /s/ Todd P. Cravens 

            	 
	
              Name: Harry Hagerty, CFO
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  the  undersigned  President  and  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company certifies that, to his knowledge:


      1.    The Company's  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 2005
            (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                          /s/ Robert McCullough
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Robert McCullough
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          Dated:  November 21, 2005
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Robert J. Doris, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sonic Solutions; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: July 29, 2005



By:

/s/    Robert J.
DorisRobert J. Doris Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald A. Duncan,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  May 8, 2006
                             /s/ Ronald A. Duncan
                             Ronald A. Duncan
                             Chief Executive Officer
                             GCI, Inc.


                                       1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NMS Communications Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William B. Gerraughty, Jr. Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/WILLIAM B. GERRAUGHTY, JR.William B. Gerraughty, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
March 16, 2005 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

This
Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference
in any such filings to the Report.

---



QuickLinks