alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued August 2 2 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01
- 12
- 00440
- CV

——————————— COSTELLA N. WILLIS , Appellant V. DARREL WILLIS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1117262

MEMORANDUM OPINION We lack jurisdiction over an appeal in which the notice of appeal is not timely filed

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.1( b); Galerie Barbizon, Inc. v. Nat’l Asset Placement Corp. , 16 S.W.3d 506, 508 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, no pet.). If a post

- judgment motion extending the appellate deadline is timely filed,2 the appellant must file its notice of appeal within 90 days after the trial court signed the judgment. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a)(1)

– (a)(4). A timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law may extend the appellate timetable when the findings and conclusions either are required by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure or could be considered by the appellate court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a)(4); IKB Indus. v . Pro

- Line Corp. , 938 S.W.2d 440, 443 (Tex. 1997). However, a request for findings and conclusions must be filed within 20 days of the rendition of judgment. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 296. The trial court entered a final decree of divorce on March 9, 2012. On May 1, 2012, Appellant Costella Nicole Willis filed her notice of appeal and a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Consequently, the notice of appeal and the request for findings of fact and conclusions o f law were filed 53 days after the final decree of divorce was entered. Willis also filed an amended notice of appeal on May 25, 2012. The amended notice of appeal references a judgment nunc pro tunc alleged to have been signed that same day. There is no indication, however, that such a judgment exists. Accordingly, the only judgment Willis can appeal from is the March 9, 2012 judgment.3 This Court sen t notice to Willis that her appeal was subject to dismissal absent proof of this Court’s jurisdiction. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Willis did not respond. The request for findings of fact was not filed within 20 days of the rendition of judgment. Thus, rule 26.1(a)(4) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure doe s not apply, and the appellant must have filed a notice of appeal within 30 days after the trial court signed the judgment. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1. Since the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days, the appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisd iction. Conclusion We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.
#### Bertha Patterson, Respondent, v. The Nassau Electric Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shon Fraisier, Also Known as Shon Fraser, Appellant.

[675 NYS2d 900]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered April 14, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, to hear and report on the issues set forth herein, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Suffolk County, is to file its report with all convenient speed.

The defendant adduced evidence that promises of no jail time and the dismissal of the instant charges were made to him in return for his cooperation in the investigations of unrelated crimes. In opposition to the defendant’s motion, *inter alia,*to enforce the terms of the cooperation agreement, the People submitted only an affirmation of an Assistant District Attorney without knowledge of the facts, who stated, on information and belief, that no promises had been made to the defendant. A hearing should be held to determine whether (1) any promise or promises were made to the defendant concerning the instant matter in order to gain his cooperation, (2) the exact nature and scope of such promise or promises, if any, and (3) whether the defendant performed services in reliance upon any such promise or promises which exposed him to danger *(see, Matter of Chaipis v State Liq. Auth.,*44 NY2d 57; *People v Greco,*69 AD2d 822; *People v Argentine,*67 AD2d 180). Accordingly, the matter is remitted for a hearing in accordance herewith, and the instant appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6



Summary of the Anthem, Inc. Directed Executive Compensation (DEC) Program (effective January 1, 2019)
The Directed Executive Compensation (DEC) program is an executive perquisite plan that provides officers of Anthem, Inc. (the “Company”) with flexibility to tailor certain benefits to meet their needs with Credits.


Credits can be used to reimburse the following expenses:


		
	•
	Investment Advisor Fees


		
	•
	Investment Management Fees


		
	•
	Financial Counseling Fees


		
	•
	Retirement Planning and Advice


		
	•
	Tax Preparation and Advice Fees


		
	•
	Estate Planning Fees


		
	•
	Legal Fees associated with:


		
	◦
	Anthem compensation and/or benefits program review


		
	◦
	Tax Preparation issues


		
	◦
	Estate Planning issues


		
	◦
	Financial Counseling issues


		
	•
	Tax and Investment Software


		
	•
	Tax, Investment and Financial Subscriptions




The amount of Credits the executive receives is based upon his or her position.


Corporate Title                Credits
    
Chief Executive Officer            $54,000 per year
Executive Vice President        $30,000 per year
Senior Vice President            $12,000 per year
Vice President                $12,000 per year


Those newly hired or promoted into an executive position will participate in the program at the beginning of the month following date of hire or promotion and will receive prorated credits for the year based on the number of full months in the position.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Amended Notice of Workgroup 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Strategic 
Planning Implementation Workgroup organized by the Interagency Autism 
Coordinating Committee (IACC). This telephone conference meeting will 
be held on August 8, 2008, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. EDT, at the 
Neuroscience Center, Conference Room A, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20892. Notice of this workgroup meeting was published in 
the Federal Register on July 31, 2008, 73 FR 44756.
    Audio of this workgroup meeting will now be accessible to the 
public via a teleconference phone link and there will be Web-based 
access to information displayed at the meeting via computer/projector.
    Access information:
    Phone Number: 888-455-2920.
    Access Number: 3857872.
    Webinar registration address: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/921061447.
    Attendance at the meeting will be limited due to space available.
    The purpose of the workgroup meeting is to discuss future budgetary 
requirements for the IACC Strategic Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorder 
(ASD) Research.
    The workgroup findings will be forwarded to the IACC for 
consideration and discussion at the next committee meeting on November 
21, 2008.
    Information about the IACC is available on the Web site: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/research-funding/scientific-meetings/recurring-meetings/iacc/index.shtml.

    Dated: August 1, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-18245 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 20 AND 21 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000916460
<NAME>                                       SOLIGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                           APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                           515
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   1390
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     144
<INVENTORY>                                                       66
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                1885
<PP&E>                                                          2726
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  2179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  2473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           1159
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           1538
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                       11788
<OTHER-SE>                                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    2473
<SALES>                                                         7153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                7153
<CGS>                                                           5085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   5085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                2824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (909)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.03)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19282]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6325]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Real Irish 
Republican Army as a Foreign Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Section 
219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, I conclude that there is a sufficient factual basis to 
find that the circumstances that were the basis for the 2003 re-
designation of the Real Irish Republican Army as a foreign terrorist 
organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation 
of the designation and that the national security of the United States 
does not warrant a revocation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the Real 
Irish Republican Army as a foreign terrorist organization, pursuant to 
Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 
U.S.C. 1189), shall be maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 11, 2008.
John D. Negroponte,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-19282 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
**P
      R O M I S S O R Y   N O T E**




$652,645.79


January
      1, 2007


Denver,
      Colorado





FOR
      VALUE RECEIVED, PARK CUMMINGS
      MINING COMPANY, a Utah corporation ("Maker"), hereby promises to pay to the
      order of PARK-PREMIER MINING COMPANY or its assigns ("Holder"), at 32391
      Horseshoe Drive, Evergreen, Colorado 80439 or at such other place Holder may
      from time to time designate in writing, in lawful money of the United States
      of
      America, the principal sum of Six Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Six Hundred Forty
      Five and 79/100 US Dollars ($652.645.79), together with interest on the unpaid
      balance at the rate of Twelve Percent (12%) per annum, on demand of Holder;
      provided, however, if not sooner paid, the entire principal amount outstanding
      and accrued interest thereon, shall be due and payable on December 31,
      2007.





This
      Note
      is subject to prepayment, in whole or in part, at the option of Maker without
      penalty.  Prepayments shall be applied first to interest accrued and
      then to principal due hereunder.





In
      case
      this Note shall not be paid in full whenever it shall become due, the Maker
      agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection, including reasonable
      attorney's fees, not to exceed 15% of the unpaid balance.





All
      rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State
      of
      Colorado, without application of its choice or conflict of law principles.
      This
      Note is unsecured.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has signed this Note effective as of the date first
      above written.





Description:  Expense
      Advances


PARK
      CUMMINGS MINING COMPANY








By: /s/ Robert W.
      Dunlap


Robert
      W. Dunlap,
      President
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 584 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.584

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                                 An Act

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a fish hatchery to the 
                             State of Iowa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF THE FAIRPORT NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE 
              STATE OF IOWA.

    (a) Conveyance.--Within 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the State of 
Iowa without reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the fish hatchery described in subsection (b) for use 
by the State for purposes of fishery resources management.
    (b) Hatchery Described.--The fish hatchery described in subsection 
(a) is the Fairport National Fish Hatchery located in Muscatine County, 
Iowa, adjacent to State Highway 22 west of Davenport, Iowa, including 
all real property, improvements to real property, and personal 
property.
    (c) Use and Reversionary Interest.--The property conveyed to the 
State of Iowa pursuant to this section shall be used by the State for 
purposes of fishery resources management, and if it is used for any 
other purpose all right, title, and interest in and to all property 
conveyed pursuant to this section shall revert to the United States.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         687,000
<SECURITIES>                                     3,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,448,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (165,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,036,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,379,000
<PP&E>                                       4,672,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,613,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,940,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,715,000
<BONDS>                                      2,839,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       304,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,082,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,940,000
<SALES>                                      8,933,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,933,000
<CGS>                                        5,653,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,653,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,615,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             252,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (452,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (452,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                190,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (262,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form  S-8 (No.  333-68801,  No.  333-62767,  No.  333-85556,  No.
333-07409,  No. 333-13887 and No. 333-62767) and in the Registration  Statements
on Form S-3 (No. 333-63991,  No. 333-11391,  No. 333-23317 and No. 333-63891) of
Oryx Technology  Corp. of our report dated May 9, 2003 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.



/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
May 29, 2003
#### MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Ching Sui A YI, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 00-4278, 00-4487, 01-3308, 01-3397.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 14, 2003.

Before SILER and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges; and ALDRICH, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Ann Aldrich, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

ALDRICH, District Judge.

The plaintiff-Appellee and cross-appellant, Meridian Diagnostics, Inc. (Meridian), brought suit against the defendant-appellants and cross-appellees, Apollo Biomedicals, Inc. (Apollo) and Dr. Ching Sui A. Yi, for misappropriation of trade secrets. Following a three-day evidentiary hearing, the district court (per Judge Beckwith, S.D. Ohio) granted a preliminary injunction in favor of Meridian, enjoining Dr. Yi from using trade secrets relating to Meridian’s H.pylori stool antigen test. Dr. Yi, proceeding pro se, has appealed the injunction, arguing that the district court: (1) based its decision “on false information presented by Meridian,” (2) “misinterpreted based on the false information,” and (3) promulgated an injunction that was “overly broad, broader than necessary, and unreasonable.” In response, Meridian has filed a cross-appeal, arguing that the district court erred in (1) failing to extend its grant of a preliminary injunction to prevent Dr. Yi and Apollo from creating a serum antigen test for H.pylori, (2) failing to find that Dr. Yi and Apollo misappropriated trade secrets regarding Meridian’s marketing materials, and (3) failing to find that additional admitted acts by Dr. Yi violated his Employment Agreement with Meridian. However, upon review, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in either the granting or denying of its preliminary injunction. *Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Engler,*257 F.3d 587, 592 (6th Cir.2001). Therefore, we AFFIRM the district court’s order in all respects and remand the present case for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. 

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 

                    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site:                     *http://www.nsf.gov/​events/​advisory.jsp*. This information may also be requested by telephoning 703/292-8182.                 

Dated: August 13, 2008. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-19040 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P