alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. James Fitzpatrick, Defendant.

Motion to make prinlingof case and exceptions a charge against county of Onondaga denied, but district attorney directed to allow the defendant to use the stenographer’s minutes of the evidence and charge for the purpose of making a case and exceptions if desired.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Webco Industries, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended July 31, 2003as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, F. William Weber, Chief Executive Officer (Principal ExecutiveOfficer) of the Company, certify as of the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based onmy knowledge:        1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and         2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.        This certification is deemed to accompany thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K, but is not deemed "filed" for purpose of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise.Date: October 28, 2003 

/s/ F. William Weber F. William Weber Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Order entered October 16, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00898-CR

MICHAEL EDWARD HARSSEMA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80837-2018

ORDER

On the Court’s own motion, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove the briefs in 

this case from the Court’s website and to seal the briefs in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.6.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 15.  LETTER RE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                                        
                                        
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
  of Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc.
Santa Rosa, California

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim financial
information of Optical Coating Laboratory, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
periods ended January 31, 1997 and 1996 as indicated in our report (which
report makes reference to the report of other accountants), dated February
28, 1997.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 1997, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 33-41050,
No. 33-26271, No. 33-12276, No. 33-48808, No. 33-65132, and No. 33-60891 on
Forms S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-61177 and No. 33-65319 on
Form S-3.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that
Act.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
March 13, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 765 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 765

                For the relief of Larry Errol Pieterse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 1995

  Mr. Linder introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Larry Errol Pieterse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR DEPORTATION OR EXCLUSION OF LARRY 
              ERROL PIETERSE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 212(a)(2)(A), 
241(a)(1)(A), and 241(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
Larry Errol Pieterse may not be deported from the United States or 
excluded from admission into the United States by reason of any offense 
for which he received a full pardon from the Governor of Florida prior 
to January 1, 1992.
    (b) Rescission of Outstanding Deportation Order.--The Attorney 
General shall rescind any outstanding order of deportation or finding 
of deportability that has been entered against Larry Errol Pieterse by 
reason of any offense for which he received a full pardon from the 
Governor of Florida prior to January 1, 1992.
    (c) Permanent Residence Status.--Notwithstanding any order 
terminating the status of Larry Errol Pieterse as an alien lawfully 
admitted for permanent residence, for purposes of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act he shall be considered lawfully admitted for permanent 
residence as of November 3, 1981, and such status shall be considered 
not to have changed between such date and the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Establishment of Good Moral Character.--Notwithstanding section 
101(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, any offense for which 
Larry Errol Pieterse received a full pardon from the Governor of 
Florida prior to January 1, 1992, may not be considered in determining 
whether he is, or during any period has been, a person of good moral 
character for purposes of such Act.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, I, Thomas E. Legro, Vice President and Controller of Gas
Transmission Northwest Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|November 7, 2003 |  | /s/    THOMAS E.
LEGRO                       
|---------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|                 |  | Thomas E. Legro Vice President and Controller



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation and will be retained by Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Gabriel Building Co. et al. *v.*The State, ex rel. Birrell, Pros. Atty.

(No. 23590

Decided June 15, 1932.)

*Mr. William M. McLain,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. G. E. Birrell,*prosecuting attorney, for defendant in error.

The sole question for determination in this case is whether Section 13195-1, General Code, known as the “Padlock Act,” is constitutional. The Ohio statute above referred to is so nearly identical with the national prohibition law on the same subject that we are constrained to follow the decisions of the United States Supreme Court which have declared the national law to be constitutional. *Mugler*v. *Kansas,*123 U. S., 623; *Lewisohn*v. *United States,*258 U. S., 630; *Grossfield*v. *United States,*276 U. S., 494.

The petition in error will therefore be dismissed.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 07/06/99 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________________

No. 97-6910 

________________________________

D.C. Docket No. 97-P-1300-S

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PEMCO AEROPLEX, INC., a subsidiary of

Precision Standard Company, a corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________________________________________________

(Opinion February 8 , 1999, 166 F.3d 1311, 11th Cir., 1999)

(July 6, 1999)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH,

DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T :
2

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on

whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of

the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court

en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 21 AND 22 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                        118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   104
<PP&E>                                           2,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,518
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,294
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,579
<SALES>                                          5,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,465
<CGS>                                            3,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (968)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (969)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel; CTSA.                     

*Date:*                         September 24-25, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, Double Tree Name Changed, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Mohan Viswanathan, PHD, Deputy Director, National Center for Research Resources, or National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 1084, Msc 4874, 1 Democracy Plaza, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0829,                         *mv10f@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: August 7, 2008. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-18749 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3(c)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                            CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
                                       OF
                    PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC



It is hereby certified that:

         1. The name of the limited liability company (hereinafter called the
"limited liability company") is: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line LLC.

         2. The certificate of formation of the limited liability company is
hereby amended by striking out Article 1 thereof and substituting in lieu of
said Article and following new Article:

                  "1.      The name of the limited liability company is:
                           Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LLC."

         3. The effective time of the amendment herein certified shall be the
time of its filing with Secretary of State.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Amendment to Certificate of Formation of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Company, LLC as
of June 24, 2003.



                                        SOUTHERN UNION PANHANDLE LLC,
                                        A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY


                                        By: /s/ THOMAS F. KARAM
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Thomas F. Karam, President
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10 - 12 - 00418 - CR
EX PARTE CRAIG E. ME NDENHALL

From the 77th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 97 - 035 - CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Craig E. Mendenhall appeals from the trial court’s denial of Menden hall’s article 11.25 petition for writ of habeas corpus, also known as a “medical writ.” T EX
. C ODE
C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN . art. 11.25 (West 2005). By letter dated November 21, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Mendenhall that his appeal was subject to dism issal because the notice of appeal appeared untimely. Mendenhall was further warned that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Mendenhall filed a response but it does not show grounds for continuing the proceeding.Ex parte Mendenhall Page 2

The trial court’s docket sheet indicates that Mendenhall’s petition was initially denied on June 25, 2012. Mendenhall presented a motion for reconsideration which was filed on July 6, 2012 and denied on July 13, 2012. Mendenhall contends the clerk’s record may have been altered and is fraudulent because the entry on the trial court’s
docket sheet indicates that the trial court denied Mendenhall’s motion for reconsideration on July 12, 2012. We received a supplemental clerk’s record which includes the trial court’s handwritten denial, dated July 13, 2012, of the motion for reconsideration. Further, we have inspected the docket sheet, and although the day of the entry could be interpre ted as a 12, we believe it is a 13, corresponding with the day the trial court signed the denial. Mendenhall’s notice of appeal was due 90 days from June 25, 2012, the date the trial court initially denied Mendenhall relief, which would have been Septemb er 24,
2012. 1 See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.2(a)(2). The notice of appeal was not filed until October 26, 2012. It is untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely notice of appeal. Olivo
v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). This appea l is dismissed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

1 The actual due date, September 23, 2012, was a Su nday. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 4.1(a).Ex parte Mendenhall Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed December 2 7 , 2012 Do not publish [CR25 ]
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





I,
Michael P. Scarpelli., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Data Domain, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Data Domain, Inc.





Date:
      August 7, 2008
            By:
            
            /s/
      MICHAEL P. SCARPELLIMichael
      P. ScarpelliSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 10.4
                                                                    ------------

                                ENDORSEMENT NO. 6
                               TO PROMISSORY NOTE
                               ------------------



         ENDORSEMENT NO. 6, dated as of July 26, 2006 to the Promissory Note,
dated May 3, 2002 (the "Note") by LEVCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., a New York
corporation (the "Borrower") in favor of JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. a New York
banking corporation (the "Bank").

         WHEREAS, the Borrower has executed and delivered to the Bank the Note;
and

         WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Bank desire to amend the Note on the
terms and conditions set forth herein to change the maturity date of the Note to
January 1, 2008

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises contained herein and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.       The date "April 30, 2007" which appears in first line thereof
                  is hereby deleted and the date "January 1, 2008" is
                  substituted in its place.

         2.       Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the terms and
                  conditions of the Note shall continue in full force and
                  effect.

         3.       This Endorsement No. 6 shall be governed by and construed in
                  accordance with New York law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Endorsement No.
6 to be duly executed and delivered by their proper and duly authorized officers
as of the day and year first above written.


                                       LEVCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                       By: _____________________________________
                                       Title:


                                       JPMORGAN CHASE BANK

                                       By: /s/ SALVATORE G. CANTARELLA
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Salvatore G. Cantarella V.P.