alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48241-48242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19111]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-08-025]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Amendment of 
Agenda Items for Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: August 15, 2008 at 11 a.m.

[[Page 48242]]


Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Background:  The Commissioners announced their individual votes in Inv. 
Nos. 701-TA-452 and 731-TA-1129-1130 (Final) (Raw Flexible Magnets from 
China and Taiwan) on August 12, 2008, during a public meeting convened 
under the Sunshine Act. During that meeting, two Commissioners 
inadvertently issued announcements not fully reflecting their actual 
votes. Accordingly, in the interests of transparency, the Commissioners 
have determined to re-announce and clarify their votes in these 
investigations at a public meeting scheduled for 11 a.m. on Friday, 
August 15, 2008. On August 12, 2008, the outstanding action jacket 
listed on the agenda for the meeting of August 15, 2008 (73 FR 46334) 
(August 8, 2008) cleared the Commission.

Actions:  In accordance with 19 CFR 201.37 (b), the following agenda 
items are being added to the meeting of August 15, 2008 at 11 a.m.:
    Agenda Item 5: Inv. Nos. 701-TA-452 and 731-TA-1129-1130 (Final) 
(Raw Flexible Magnets from China and Taiwan)--clarification and re-
vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its 
determinations and Commissioners' opinions to the Secretary of Commerce 
on or before August 25, 2008.)
    Agenda Item 6: Outstanding action jackets: None
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier notification of these 
amendments to the agenda was not possible.

    Issued: August 13, 2008.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E8-19111 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-81276) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-92143) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-120685) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-97850) pertaining to the Employee Stock PurchasePlan of Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(5) Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 33-94378) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment Planof Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(6) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-147249) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.of our reports dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Southwest Bancorp, Inc. forthe year ended December 31, 2007.Ernst& Young LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27.1

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CASH FLOWS AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             469
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                      3,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,908
<PP&E>                                           3,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,028
<BONDS>                                         27,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,143
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,335)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (25,192)
<SALES>                                         19,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,271
<CGS>                                           14,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    582
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                582
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,961
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        

</TABLE>
#### Sherry G. LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-5515.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 19, 2003.

*807Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; KENNEDY and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

Sherry G. Lewis appeals the summary judgment for the defendant, United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”), an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Atlanta, Georgia, in this civil rights action filed under the Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”), TenmCode Ann. §§ 4-21-101 et seq. She also asserted state common law claims for outrageous conduct and defamation. UPS removed the action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee without objection under 28 U.S.C. § 1382, the diversity jurisdiction statute. The parties have expressly waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Lewis began her employment with UPS in 1979 as a package driver in Nashville, Tennessee. From 1979 through 1998, Lewis received numerous promotions and lateral job position changes at UPS, many of which included additional job responsibilities and salary increases. However, on November 11, 1999, UPS terminated Lewis’s employment, citing Lewis’s unprofessional behavior as a reason for the decision.

UPS filed a motion for summary judgment on all of Lewis’s claims. The district court granted the motion. On appeal, she has briefed only the outrageous conduct claim. She has thus waived the district court’s dismissal of her claims of gender-based discrimination and harassment under the THRA and her state law defamation claim. *See Wright v. Holbrook,*794 F.2d 1152,1156-57 (6th Cir.1986).

This court reviews the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. *See Smith v. Ameritech,*129 F.3d 857, 863 (6th Cir.1997). Summary judgment is appropriate only when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment to UPS on Lewis’s claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Under Tennessee law, a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress must involve outrageous conduct or circumstances. *See Medlin v. Allied Inv. Co.,*217 Tenn. 469, 398 S.W.2d 270, 274 (1966); *Swallows v. Western Elec. Co.,*543 S.W.2d 581, 582-83 (Tenn.1976). Lewis contends that UPS engaged in outrageous conduct because “[a]fter complaining to management about the harassment,” she was “used as ‘bait’ by management to catch the guilty male harassers.” Lewis made no objection to that procedure. The culprits were identified and sanctioned. The record does not support Lewis’s contentions *808that defendant engaged in outrageous conduct under Tennessee law.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Philip Cook
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas F. DardenPhilip Cook
    
    
    
    Thomas F. DardenSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            35,872
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           53,977
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             54,396
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  89,849
<CASH>                                          10,410
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               6,183
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,731
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 49,256
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             13,308
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  6,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,610
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,731
<PREMIUMS>                                      63,058
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              5,667
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                      39,080
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      6,327
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             8,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,982
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  37,138
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             49,440
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                             (11,051)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              16,239
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                10,032
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 49,256
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          8,075
        

</TABLE>
No. 12,572.

#### Antonio Monteleone vs. Mrs. J. M. Harding et als.

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. *Monroe, J.*

*Albert Voorhies*for Plaintiff, Appellee.

*Dart & Kernan*for Defendants, Appellants.

*1153*Farrar, Jonas, Kruttsahnitt & Gurley*for Royal Insurance Company, Intervenor, Appellee.

Argued and submitted February 24, 1898.

Opinion handed down March 8, 1898.

Rehearing refused June 28, 1898.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

The facts in this case and the issues are the same as in the case of A. Monteleone vs. Mrs. J. M. Harding *et als.,*No. 12,541, handed down yesterday morning.

For the reasons assigned in that ease, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
A. Brodeur, Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ MICHAEL A. BRODEUR
---------------------------------------
    Michael A. Brodeur
    Executive Vice President
    and Interim Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DCHAE T. MADISON , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D21

- 91

[ February 25, 2021 ]

Appeal from the County Cour t for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Robert Panse , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 50

- 2019

- MM

002571AXXX

- NB and 50

- 2020

- AP

- 000002

- ZXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and L.K.S. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

David Aronberg, State Attorney, and Joseph R. Kadis, Assistant State Attorney, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

L EVINE , C.J., G ROSS and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit (99)(a)

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CMS Energy Company (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth
Whipple, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Thomas J. Webb, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kenneth Whipple
--------------------------------
Name:  Kenneth Whipple
Title: Chairman of the Board and
       Chief Executive Officer
Date:  May 12, 2003

/s/ Thomas J. Webb
-----------------------------------
Name:  Thomas J. Webb
Title: Executive Vice President and
       Chief Financial Officer
Date:  May 12, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EQUITY INNS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         309,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           237
<OTHER-SE>                                     222,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,880
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,430
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,382
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,933 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,473
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.78



Littelfuse, Inc. 
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


For the 2019 fiscal year, non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $75,000, paid in quarterly installments, plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses relating to attendance at meetings. Our directors are also reimbursed for the costs associated with attending one continuing education program every three years. No fees are paid to directors who are employee directors. Additional annual retainers are paid to our Board leadership, as shown below:
	
		
	Board Leadership Role
	Annual Retainer

	Lead Director
	$20,000

	Board Chairman
	$50,000

	Audit Committee Chairperson
	$20,000

	Compensation Committee Chairperson
	$15,000

	Nominating and Governance Committee Chairperson
	$10,000

	Technology Committee Chairperson
	$10,000




 
In addition to cash compensation, each non-employee director received an annual equity grant under the Amended and Restated Littelfuse, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan valued at approximately $140,000. The equity grant is comprised of (1) one-third stock options that vest equally on the first three annual anniversaries of the grant date, have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and expire seven years from the grant date, and (2) two-thirds restricted stock units that are granted upon the non-employee director’s election or reelection to the Board at the Company’s annual meeting and that vest equally on the first three annual anniversaries of the grant date.


1
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-20611

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LOUIS BERNARD DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(CR H 95-235-4)

_________________________________________________________________

April 16, 1997

Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louis Bernard Davis is a codefendant of Deon Tarral

McDaniel, both having been charged with robbery and use of a

firearm in a crime of violence. Davis also pleaded guilty and

was sentenced with McDaniel. Davis appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence. The pertinent facts of both appeals are

identical, and Davis raises essentially the same claims as
2

McDaniel. We disposed of McDaniel’s claims in United States v.

McDaniel, No. 96-20610, which was issued today, and for the

reasons given in McDaniel, we AFFIRM Davis’s guilty-plea

conviction and sentence.