alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex Parte E. C. Sanders.

No. 25080.

November 1, 1950.

*228
      *Letts & Mathis,*Houston, for relator.

*A. C. Winborn,*Criminal District Attorney, *E. T. Branch,*Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Houston, and *George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Honorable Frank Williford, Jr., judge of the criminal district court of Harris County, refusing appellant’s application for discharge based upon his contention that he had served the time of his sentence of six months in the county jail.

It is shown by the record that he was committed on the 26th day of September, 1949, but that his sentence has been interrupted by successive reprieves issued by the Governor so that the actual time served was fifty-eight days, up to the 22nd day of August, 1950. The court heard the evidence on the application and so determined.

It is further recited that the second reprieve, dated January 18, 1950, expiring on March 22nd, 1950, provided that on said date the defendant would voluntarily return to said jail to finish out said term of six months, “which he did not do.”

The court relied on Ex Parte Underwood, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 157, 248 S. W. 551; Ex Parte Black, 123 Tex. Cr. R. 472, 59 S. W. (2d) 828; and Ex Parte Wyatt, 29 Tex. App. 398, 16 S. W. 301. We are of the opinion that the court made the proper order and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000074697
<NAME> OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,419
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,835
<INVENTORY>                                     24,634
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,578
<PP&E>                                         185,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,774
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           87,795
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,559
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,592
<SALES>                                         53,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,373
<CGS>                                           36,235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,905
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,596
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,596
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Benjamin S. Rhodes, Appellant

No. 06-14-00057-CV v.

George L. Preston and Associates, Attorney 

at Law; and Jerry L. Coyle, Attorney at 

Law, Appellees

Appeal from the 62nd District Court of

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 83219). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Benjamin S. Rhodes, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 848 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 301
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 848

                          [Report No. 104-603]

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
                       Military Park in Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1995

 Mr. Deal of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

                              June 4, 1996

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
                       Military Park in Georgia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

<DELETED>SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF 
              APPROPRIATIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize and 
direct the National Park Service to assist the State of Georgia in 
relocating a highway affecting the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
Military Park in Georgia'', approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 
1442), is amended by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting 
``$45,000,000''.</DELETED>

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 1(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize and direct 
the National Park Service to assist the State of Georgia in relocating 
a highway affecting the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National Military 
Park in Georgia'', approved December 24, 1987 (101 Stat. 1442), is 
amended by striking ``$30,000,000'' and inserting ``$51,900,000''.
                                     

                                                 Union Calendar No. 301

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 848

                          [Report No. 104-603]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for assistance for 
 highway relocation regarding the Chickamauga and Chattanooga National 
                       Military Park in Georgia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 4, 1996

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 23     **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     The Board of Directors    Gardner Denver, Inc.:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration    statements (Nos.    33-91088,333-24921,333-84397,333-61314,    and    333-116108)    on    Form S-8    and the registration statements (Nos.    333-109086    and    333-122422)    on    Form S-3    of Gardner Denver, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company), of our    report dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the    consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of    December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated    statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash    flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended    December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,    which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report    on    Form 10-K    of the Company.     As discussed in Notes 1 and 12 to the consolidated    financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the    Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board    Interpretation No. 48, *“Accounting for Uncertainty    in Income Taxes, an interpretation of Statement of Financial    Accounting Standard No. 109.”*     As discussed in Notes 1 and 9 to the consolidated financial    statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial    Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 158,    “*Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension    and Other Postretirement Plans*” as of December 31,    2006.     As discussed in Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated    financial statements, effective January 1, 2006 the Company    adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock-based    compensation as required by SFAS No. 123 (Revised    2004), “*Share-Based Payment.*” /s/  KPMG    LLP     St. Louis, Missouri    February 28, 2008
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Cubie Lee CLAY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 72-2500.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Anthony M. Earl (argued), of Earl & Earl, Las Vegas, Nev., for defendant and appellant.

Kenneth C. Cory, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), V. DeVoe Heaton, U. S. Atty., Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff and appel-lee.

Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and LUCAS, District Judge.*

*

 Honorable Malcolm M. Lucas, United States District Judge, for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this case of passing counterfeit money is affirmed.

An officer’s recounted statement of another’s passing a counterfeit bill was non-prej udicial.

And we find the testimony about a call to the sheriff’s office for a name check did not taint the record. No motions to strike were made with reference to either of the foregoing statements. There was only a motion for a mistrial.

We think knowledge could be inferred from the circumstances.

Bail is revoked effective now.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11680

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLARENCE BRENSON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 2:18-cr-00203-JB-B-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11680

Before WILSON, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Domingo Soto, appointed counsel for Clarence Brenson in 

his appeal from the revocation of his supervised release, has moved 

to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed 

a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brenson’s revocation 

and sentence are AFFIRMED. 

USCA11 Case: 22-11680 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 12/16/2022 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 689 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 689

 To require the Secretary of Agriculture to take action to control the 
  infestation of southern pine beetles currently ravaging wilderness 
                      areas in the State of Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 1995

  Mr. Wilson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
     Committee on Resources and, in addition, to the Committee on 
Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Agriculture to take action to control the 
  infestation of southern pine beetles currently ravaging wilderness 
                      areas in the State of Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONTROL OF THE SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE IN WILDERNESS AREAS IN 
              TEXAS.

    Notwithstanding section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 
1133(c)) and section 4(a) of the Texas Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public 
Law 98-574; 98 Stat. 3051), the Secretary of Agriculture shall 
undertake active measures--
            (1) to control the infestation of the southern pine beetle 
        in the five wilderness areas in the State of Texas designated 
        in section 2 of the Texas Wilderness Act of 1984; and
            (2) to prevent the spread of the southern pine beetle from 
        such wilderness areas to adjacent private forest lands.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of TRANS GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arthur
P. Grider III, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                   /s/  Arthur P. Grider III
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   ARTHUR P. GRIDER III, Chief Financial Officer
                                   and Treasurer
                                   Date: October 27, 2003


<PAGE>
ORIGINA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0407

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL BRANDON BREAREY,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILEL

NOV 0 4 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Appellant Michael Brandon Brearey appeals the June 24, 2019 Dispositional Order

of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, that revoked his deferred

imposition of sentence in that court's Cause No. DC-16-294B.

The State had petitioned to revoke Brearey's deferred sentence because it alleged

he committed two violations of the conditions of his probation. On appeal, Brearey argues

that the District Court should not have revoked his deferred sentence because the State had

not exhausted all remedies of the Montana Incentives Intervention Grid. Brearey further

asserts his counsel was ineffective.

The State has filed a Notice of Concession. Although it maintains it does not agree

with all the arguments advanced by Brearey, it concedes this Court should reverse the

District Court's revocation of Brearey's deferred sentence and remand this matter to the

District Court for the setting of a new revocation hearing.

Having considered the Appellant's Opening Brief and the State's Notice of

Concession, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Dispositional Order of June 24, 2019, is

REVERSED. The revocation of Brearey's deferred sentence in Cause No. DC-16-294B

11/04/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0407
of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, is VACATED. This matter is

remanded with instructions for the District Court to set a new revocation hearing.

Dated this y day of November, 2020.

2

:/„1"..3 

11b 

Justices
|   | 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for      the period ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      China Advanced Construction Materials Group,  Inc. |

| Date:      January 20, 2009                     |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| /s/Xianfu Han                                   |
| Xianfu      HanPrincipal      Executive Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,320
<SECURITIES>                                    33,654
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                        46
<INVENTORY>                                      1,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   775
<PP&E>                                           9,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,823
<SALES>                                          4,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,898
<CGS>                                            1,340
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (36)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 687<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,309)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
<FN>
<F1>INTEREST INCOME, NET OF INTEREST EXPENSE.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Charles P. WAGNER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. I. V. SHANNON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14327.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 8, 1933.

C. L. Johnson, of New Orleans, for appellant.

M. C. Seharff, of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor for $1,600.

When the case was called for argument, counsel for defendant and appellant filed a motion to transfer the case to the Supreme Court, alleging that the ease had been appealed to this court in error; the proper jurisdiction being in the Supreme Court under the provisions of article 7, section 10, of the Constitution of 1921.

The motion should prevail. See Spearman v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co., 164 La. 677, 114 So. 591. Therefore, upon the authority conferred upon us by Act No. 19 of 1912, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this appeal be and it is transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana to be disposed of according to law; the transfer to be made within 60 days after this judgment becomes final, and, if not so made, then the appeal to be deemed dismissed; defendant and appellant to pay the costs of appeal in this court and the remaining costs to await final determination of the matter.

Appeal transferred to Supreme Court.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Hyman Cohen.

Motion denied.