alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6108

RAYMOND TATE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; J. C. STREEVAL, Warden , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Glen E. Conrad , Senior District Judge. ( 7:20

- cv - 00245

- GEC

- PMS )

Submitted : May 25, 2021 Decided: May 28, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Raymond Tate, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Tate , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Tate v. United States , No. 7:20

- cv - 00245

- GEC

- PMS (W.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2020 & Jan. 29,
2021 )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
226 So.2d 644

#### Charlie HANNON v. STATE of Alabama.

2 Div. 522.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 18, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Bibb County; L. S. Moore, Judge.

*731O. S. Burke, Jr., Centerville, for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and John A. Lockett, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to 2 Div. 521, styled Hannon v. State of Alabama, 226 So.2d 90. The cases were consolidated and tried together on one record. They are identical as to the sentences of the court. The briefs filed in each case are identical. Therefore, on authority of 2 Div. 521, decided by this Court on August 14, 1969, this case is due to be, and is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, MERRILL and HAR-WOOD, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting of the Board of Directors; Amended Notice

    The Internet link reflected in footnote one has been amended. No 
other changes have been made to the original notice issued on August 
11, 2008.

Time and Date: The Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors will 
meet on August 18, 2008 via conference call. The meeting will begin at 
3:30 p.m. EDT and continue until conclusion of the Board's agenda.

Location: 3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007, 3rd Floor 
Conference Center.

Status of Meeting: Open. Directors will participate by telephone 
conference in such a manner as to enable interested members of the 
public to hear and identify all persons participating in the meeting. 
Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so by 
joining participating staff at the location indicated above. Members of 
the public wishing to listen to the meeting by telephone should call 1-
888-390-3110 and enter 10850 on the key pad when prompted. To enhance 
the quality of your listening experience, as well as that of others, 
and to eliminate background noises that interfere with the audio 
recording of the proceeding, please mute your telephone during the 
meeting.

Matters to be Considered: 
1. Consider and act on adoption of agenda
2. Consider and act on whether to authorize the transfer or 
reprogramming of LSC's FY 2008 Loan Repayment Assistance Program (LRAP) 
funds to LSC's FY 2009 Management and Administration budget \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Board of Directors welcomes public comment on 
Management's proposal, which will be available to for public 
inspection at http://www.lsc.gov/foia2/pdfs/eprr/Board_Memorandum_with_background_on_reprogramming_request.pdf as of 10 a.m. (EDT) 
on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    a. Staff Report
    b. Public Comment
3. Consider and act on other business
4. Consider and act on motion to adjourn the meeting
    Contact Person for Information: Patricia Batie, Manager of Board 
Operations, at (202) 295-1500.

Special Needs: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 295-1500.

    Dated: August 11, 2008.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President & General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E8-18883 Filed 8-12-08; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
```
#### William Dye *alias*William Rainey v. State.

No. 25,876.

June 4, 1952.

Hon. A. A. Dawson, Judge Presiding.

*W. E. Pinkston,*Dallas, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for murder, with punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

Notice of appeal to this court was given on March 11, 1952, at the time of passage of sentence.

The state moves to dismiss the appeal because of appellant’s escape from custody pending the appeal. As supporting the mo*381tion, the state presents the affidavit of the sheriff of Kaufman County showing that on April 22, 1952, appellant escaped from his jail cell and was thereafter recaptured in another county and returned to custody.

Under the express and mandatory provisions of Art. 824, Vernon’s C. C. P., an escape from custody automatically operates to terminate the jurisdiction of this court over an appeal by the escapee. The statute also provides for setting aside the order of dismissal upon the voluntary return of the escapee within ten days to the officer from whom he escaped.

The direct question here involved was before this court in Pendergrass v. State, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 467, 244 S. W. 513, wherein we held that a recapture after being at liberty one day was not a voluntary return within the meaning of the statute.

Accordingly, the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is well taken and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hwan Chun SOK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02—4245.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 2003.

Decided March 13, 2003.

David B. Freedman, White & Grumpier, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Michael F. Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Hwan Chun Sok pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to six counts of trafficking in counterfeit trademark goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2320 (2000). On appeal, Sok raises two claims: (1) the district court improperly increased his offense level by five levels for trafficking in counterfeit goods with a value exceeding $40,000, *see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2Fl.l(b)(l)(F) (2000); and (2) he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea.**576Finding these contentions meritless, we affirm Sok’s plea and sentence.

As to his first claim, Sok did not file objections to the Presentence Report and did not object at sentencing. Accordingly, our review is for plain error. *United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 731-32, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). Sok fails to establish any error at all, much less plain error. Neither the Government nor the district court were obligated to inform Sok of the alleged value of the counterfeit goods because the value of the goods is not an element of the offenses for which Sok was indicted. Rather, value was a factor that enhanced Sok’s sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court explained each element of the offense that the Government was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, and Sok acknowledged he understood. The court did not plainly err by not informing Sok of a factor that could enhance his sentence.

Sok also claims he should be allowed to withdraw his plea. Essentially, he claims that certain exchanges with the court at sentencing indicate that he may have been unaware of the criminality of his offense when he entered his guilty plea. This contention is baseless. Sok freely admitted his guilt at both the guilty plea and sentencing hearings and acknowledged that he understood the nature of his offenses and the elements of his crimes.

Accordingly, we affirm Sok’s guilty plea and sentence. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 The district court appropriately did not take action on the motion because it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the motion after sentencing. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.3


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF CROWN NORTHCORP, INC.
                      -------------------------------------

Crown Revenue Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown NorthCorp, Inc.

Crown Properties, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown Revenue Services, Inc.

CNC Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown
NorthCorp, Inc.

Eastern Realty, L.L.C., a Virginia limited company, with 99% of the membership
interests owned by CNC Holding Corp., and 1% owned by Crown Revenue Services,
Inc.

Crown NorthCorp Euro A/S. a Danish corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
CNC Holding Corp.

Crown NorthCorp Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of England and
Wales, is a wholly owned subsidiary of CNC Holding Corp.

Eastern Realty Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of CNC Holding Corp.

Eastern Baltimore, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
CNC Holding Corp.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,439,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,030,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (460,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 17,291,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,463,000
<PP&E>                                     100,282,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (34,865,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,129,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,464,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,995,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  64,002,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,129,000
<SALES>                                     48,899,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,899,000
<CGS>                                       35,648,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               44,879,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,009,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,987,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,061,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,926,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,926,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    536,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,261
<PP&E>                                       2,617,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                 824,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,477,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          654,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       353,407
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,470,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,477,897
<SALES>                                        362,435
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               636,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (252,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (253,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (253,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Barrett, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county affirmed. No opinion. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### Joseph Gordon v. Frank J. Farrell.

Motion denied on terms stated in order.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Agatha Auduon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Arkson
Nutraceuticals, Inc.


Date: 5/11/09                               By: /s/ Agatha Auduon
                                               ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Agatha Auduon
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6040 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 6040

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11 Robert Smalls Parkway Suite C, in Beaufort, South Carolina, as 
                   the ``Robert Smalls Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2021

 Ms. Mace (for herself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
   Timmons, Mr. Norman, Mr. Clyburn, and Mr. Rice of South Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11 Robert Smalls Parkway Suite C, in Beaufort, South Carolina, as 
                   the ``Robert Smalls Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT SMALLS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11 Robert Smalls Parkway Suite C, in Beaufort, South 
Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert Smalls Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Smalls Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Brady, the Acting Chief Financial Officer of Skyline Multimedia
Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 15, 2004




/s/ Robert Brady
----------------
Name: Robert Brady
Title: Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (No. 333-161815, and No. 333-165491) and Form S-8 (No. 333-127627)
of Sonic Solutions of our reports dated June 4, 2010, relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appear in this
Form 10-K.





/s/
ARMANINO McKENNA, LLP





San
Ramon, California


June 4,
2010
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 768

To create a liveable wage by the year 2000.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 1, 1995

Mr. CLYBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To create a liveable wage by the year 2000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Liveable Wage Act

5 of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

7 Paragraph (1) of section 6(a) of the Fair Labor

8 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)) is amended to

9 read as follows:

10 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec11 tion, $4.60 during the period beginning January 1,

12 1996, $4.85 during the period beginning January 1,
2

•HR 768 IH

1 1997, $5.00 during the period beginning January 1,

2 1998, $5.15 during the period beginning January 1,

3 1999, and $5.30 during the period beginning Janu4 ary 1, 2000;’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Brooks Fiber Properties, Inc. and is qualified in tis
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      87,687,000
<SECURITIES>                                52,770,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               38,082,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           191,355,000
<PP&E>                                     782,694,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              61,479,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,206,233,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      911,849,000
<BONDS>                                         56,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       391,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 291,047,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,206,233,000
<SALES>                                    128,791,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           128,791,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              210,161,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          55,191,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (136,382,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (136,382,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (3,077,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (139,459,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, United States District Judge for **

the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. 

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ELBIS SAUL MARTINEZ-ESCALON,

a.k.a. Elbis Saul Martinez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10096

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-03586-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted January 15, 2013*** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

Elbis Saul Martinez-Escalon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry after

FILED

JAN 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10096

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez-Escalon’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We

have provided Martinez-Escalon the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. 

No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
#### MATTEL, INC., Appellant, v. REISS WHOLESALE HARDWARE COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. 03-1188.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 31, 2003.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).