alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The
Pantry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 25, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. Kelly, Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/S/    DANIEL J. KELLYDaniel J. KellyVice President, Finance andChief Financial OfficerDate: December 9, 2003






This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### DESSALLES v. TICHENOR.

No. 16532.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 14, 1936.

Sydney J. Parlohgue, of New; Orleans, for appellant.

H. M. Ansley, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for defendant and appellee have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal upon the ground that the amount in controversy exceeds the maximum jurisdiction of this court. Counsel for plaintiff and appellant have answered the motion, stating that “through inadvertence this appeal was lodged in this Honorable Court whereas the amount, in money and property involved therein, apparently exceeds the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court and that consequently this appeal should have been lodged in the Supreme Court.”

We have examined the record, and it appearing that there is involved a claim for $936.57 and also a claim for the ownership of two mortgage notes, one for $2,000 and one for $3,400, we, therefore, find that the motion to dismiss is well founded. Availing ourselves of the authority of Act No. 19 of 1912, we will order the case transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana.

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this appeal be, and it is, transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana to be disposed of according to law, the transfer to be made within 60 days after this judgment becomes final, and, if not so made, then the appeal to be deemed dismissed; appellant to pay the c.ost of appeal in this court, the remaining costs to await final determination of the matter.

Appeal transferred to the Supreme Court.
#### The People of the State of New York v. John Barry. The People of the State of New York v. Walter K. Freeman. The People of the State of New York v. Warren Nelson. The People of the State of New York v. Vincenzo Enea. The People of the State of New York v. Pietro Giannona. The People of the State of New York v. Henry Hosier

Motions denied on condition that appellants have their appeals ready for argument at the May term.
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
of CAI Wireless Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-99770) of our
report, which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt
about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern, dated June
15,1998, except for Note 2, as to which the date is June 24, 1998, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of CAI Wireless Systems, Inc.
as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended March 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
June 29, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Project No. 2535-110] 

An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. The EA was prepared for an application filed by South Carolina Electric & Gas Company on October 26, 2007, requesting the Commission's authorization to permit the Columbia County Water and Sewerage System (Columbia) to increase the maximum allowable rate of water withdrawn from the Stevens Creek Project reservoir from 10 to 47.1 million gallons per day. 

The EA evaluates the environmental impacts that would result from permitting Columbia to withdraw additional water from the Stevens Creek reservoir. The proposal would include no construction activity because the existing facilities are sufficient to allow the increase in water withdrawn. The EA finds that approval of the application would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 

                    A copy of the EA is attached to a Commission order titled “Order Modifying and Approving Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters,” issued August 8, 2008, and is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room, or it may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number “P-2535” in the docket field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-(866)-208-3372 or (202) 502-8659 (for TTY).                 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-18997 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
NUMBER 13-22-00016-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN THE INTEREST OF G.M.K., A CHILD

On appeal from the 267th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, J.W.K., attempts to appeal an order in suit to modify the parent-child 

relationship. On November 23, 2021, appellant filed his request for findings of facts and 

conclusions of law, followed by a notice of past due findings of fact and conclusions of 

law on December 22, 2021. The trial court entered findings of fact on January 11, 2022; 

however, the trial court did not include any conclusions of law. On March 10, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion to reverse and remand this matter for failure to file conclusions of 
2

law, or, in the alternative, to abate the appeal with instruction to the trial court to file its 

conclusions of law. 

Appellant’s motion to reverse and remand is DENIED; however, appellant’s motion 

to abate is GRANTED and the cause is remanded to the trial court. On remand, the trial 

court shall issue conclusions of law pursuant to appellant’s request. Further, after a review 

of the record, this Court became aware that the trial court’s final order does not contain 

the date on which the order was signed. The trial court should further correct the 

deficiency on the final order. The conclusions of law and corrected final order should be 

forwarded to the Clerk of this Court in a supplemental record within thirty days from the 

date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

15th day of March, 2022.
EXHIBIT 10.2
                                                                    ------------

              The CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc.            T: 212 382-7000
              1211 Avenue of the Americas
              New York, NY 10036

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]
     CiT

                                                       July 26, 2006

LEVCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
462 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10018

Gentlemen:

We refer to the Factoring Agreement between us dated September 17, 1998 as
amended (the "Factoring Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein and defined
in the Factoring Agreement shall have the same meanings as specified therein
unless otherwise specifically defined herein.

This is to confirm that pursuant to mutual consent and understanding, effective
as of the date hereof the fifth sentence of Paragraph 15.1 of Section 15 of the
Factoring Agreement which provides for the Minimum Factoring Fees shall be, and
hereby is, deleted in its entirety.

To compensate us for the use of our in-house legal department and facilities in
documenting this agreement, you agree to pay us a Documentation Fee equal to
$135.00. Said amount shall be due and payable upon the date hereof and may at
our option be charged to your account under the Agreement on the due date
thereof.

Except to the extent set forth herein, no other change or amendment in any of
the terms, provisions or conditions of the Factoring Agreement is intended or
implied. If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our
agreement, kindly so indicate by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this
letter.


                                       Very truly yours,

                                       THE CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                                       By: /s/ ANTHONY MONTEMARANO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Anthony Montemarano
                                           Title: Vice President

Read and Agreed to:

LEVCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By: /s/ ROBERT A. LEVINSON
    ------------------------------
Name:  Robert A. Levinson
Title: Chairman
Exhibit






Exhibit 10(a)26


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
SOUTHERN COMPANY
EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN




WHEREAS, Southern Company Services, Inc. adopted the latest amendment and restatement of The Southern Company Employee Savings Plan (“Plan”), effective as of January 1, 2018; 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Plan, the Southern Company Employee Savings Plan Committee (“Administrative Committee”) may amend the Plan, provided the amendment either (a) does not involve a substantial increase in cost to any Employing Company, or (b) is necessary, proper, or desirable in order to comply with applicable laws or regulations enacted or promulgated by any federal or state governmental authority and to maintain the qualified status of the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Administrative Committee, in its settlor capacity, desires to amend the Plan to provide for cessation of participation for employees of Gulf Power Company who are no longer Employees due to the divestiture that occurred on January 1, 2019 and to provide for full vesting for the Accounts of such employees. 
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to resolutions adopted on October 22, 2018, the Administrative Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective as specified below:
1.
The Plan is hereby amended by adding a new paragraph (d) to Section 3.7 to read as follows:
(d)    Gulf Power Company.
(1)    Cessation of Participation.  Effective as of January 1, 2019, Participants who cease to be Employees due to the sale of Gulf Power Company will cease to be eligible to actively participate in the Plan.
 (2)    Vesting Acceleration.  Effective as of January 1, 2019, (i) Gulf Power Company will cease to be an Employing Company under the Plan; and (ii) Participants who cease to be Employees due to the sale of Gulf Power Company will be deemed to be fully vested in their Accounts for all purposes hereunder.
2.
The Plan is hereby amended by deleting Gulf Power Company from the list of Employing Companies in Appendix A.









3.
Except as amended by this Second Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Administrative Committee, through its authorized representative, has adopted this Second Amendment to The Southern Company Employee Savings Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2018, this 29th day of January, 2019.


	
				
	 
	EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE



	 
	By:
	 
	/s/James M. Garvie

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Name:
	James M. Garvie

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Its:
	 
	Chairperson








2
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 19, 2017

NO. 03

- 16

- 00248

- CV

Jose A. Soliz, Appellant

v.

Home Depot, USA, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, P EMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

— OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district cou rt on March 9 , 2016

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment . Therefore, the C ourt affirms the judgment

. The appellant shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### Charles Mueller, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, *892Appellant.

Judgment and order of the County Court of Queens county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 869

_____________________________
D ION R OMERO M IXSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. James H. Daniel , Judge

. May 3, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and L EWIS and R OBERTS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Greg Caracci, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley M oody, Attorney Gener al, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
##### 



Exhibit 21  SUBSIDIARIES
    OF GARDNER DENVER, INC.
    JURISDICTION OFLEGAL NAME

INCORPORATIONAir-Relief, Inc.

KentuckyEmco Wheaton USA, Inc.

TexasGardner Denver Hanover, Inc.

DelawareGardner Denver International, Inc.

DelawareGardner Denver Nash LLC

DelawareGardner Denver Oberdorfer Pumps, Inc.

DelawareGardner Denver Thomas, Inc.

DelawareGardner Denver Water Jetting Systems, Inc.

TexasTCM Investments, Inc. (dba Gardner Denver Petroleum Pumps)

OklahomaThomas Industries Inc.

DelawareGardner Denver Austria GmbH

AustriaGardner Denver Australia Pty Ltd.

AustraliaGardner Denver Nash Australia Pty Ltd.

AustraliaGardner Denver Industries Australia Pty Ltd.

AustraliaGardner Denver Belgium NV

BelgiumBelliss & Morcom Brasil Ltda.

BrazilGardner Denver Nash Brasil Industria e Comercio de Bombas
    Ltda.

BrazilGardner Denver Brasil Comercio Ltda.

BrazilEmco Wheaton Corp.

CanadaGardner Denver Machinery (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Nash Machinery Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Thomas Pneumatic Systems (Wuxi) Co. Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Trading (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.

ChinaGardner Denver Czech Republic s.r.o

Czech RepublicGardner Denver Denmark A/S

DenmarkGardner Denver Oy

FinlandGardner Denver Elmo France SARL

FranceGardner Denver France SA

FranceGardner Denver SA

FranceRietschle Thomas France S.A.S

FranceEmco Wheaton GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Deutschland GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Holdings GmbH & Co. KG

GermanyGardner Denver Holdings Verwaltungs GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Nash Deutschland GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Schopfheim GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Thomas GmbH

GermanyTIWR Holdings GmbH

GermanyGardner Denver Hong Kong Limited

Hong KongGardner Denver Italy S.r.l

ItalyGardner Denver S.r.l

ItalyGardner Denver Japan Ltd.

JapanGardner Denver Nash Benelux B.V

NetherlandsGardner Denver Nederland B.V

NetherlandsGardner Denver Netherlands Holdings B.V.

NetherlandsRietschle Thomas Netherlands B.V

NetherlandsGardner Denver New Zealand Ltd.

New ZealandGardner Denver Polska Sp. z.o.o

PolandGardner Denver Nash Singapore Pte. Ltd.

SingaporeGardner Denver Slovakia s.r.o

SlovakiaGardner Denver Korea Ltd.

South KoreaGardner Denver Iberica, S.L

SpainGardner Denver Nash Scandinavia A.B.

SwedenGardner Denver Sweden AB

SwedenTodo AB

Sweden




---



##### 



JURISDICTION OFLEGAL NAME

INCORPORATIONGardner Denver Schweiz AG

SwitzerlandGardner Denver Taiwan Ltd.

TaiwanBelliss & Morcom Limited

United KingdomEmco Wheaton U.K. Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Alton Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Drum Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Group Services Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Hoffman, Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Industries Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver International Ltd

United KingdomGardner Denver Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver Nash UK Ltd.

United KingdomGardner Denver UK Ltd.

United KingdomGD First (UK) Ltd.

United KingdomTodo Products Ltd.

United KingdomWebster Drives Ltd.

United Kingdom
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 565 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 565

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to retroactively restore and 
  make permanent the exclusion for amounts received under group legal 
                            services plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 1995

 Mr. Moakley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to retroactively restore and 
  make permanent the exclusion for amounts received under group legal 
                            services plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP 
              LEGAL SERVICES PLANS.

    (a) General Rule.--Section 120 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking subsection (e) (relating to termination) and by 
redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of section 104 of the Tax 
Extension Act of 1991 is amended by striking paragraph (2).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1991.
                                 <all>
```
SCWC-14-0001115 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

P L III, LLC, a Hawai # i limited liability company; ARICK B. YANAGIHARA; MICHAEL H. NEKOBA; WILLIAM G. BOYLE; a nd ANITA MATSUZAKI, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Counterclaim D efendants-Appellants,

vs. PUU LANI RANCH CORP., a Hawai # i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee, and F. NEWELL BOHNETT, as Trustee under that certain unrecorded Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated July 29, 1981, made b y F. Newell Bohnett, as Settlor; and F. NEWELL BOHNETT, i n his individual capacity, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

------------------------------------------------------- P L III, LLC, a Hawai # i limited liability company; ARICK B. YANAGIHARA; MICHAEL H. NEKOBA; WILLIAM G. BOYLE; and ANITA MATSUZAKI, Petitioners/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,

vs. PUU LANI RANCH CORP., a Hawai # i corporation, Respondent/Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant, and F. NEWELL BOHNETT, as Trustee under that certain unrecorded Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated July 29, 1981, made b y F. Newell Bohnett, as Settlor; and F. NEWELL BOHNETT, in his individual capacity, Respondents/Defendants-Appellants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0001115, CAAP-15-0000484, and CAAP-15-0000671; CIVIL NO. 11-1-433K) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0001115 22-NOV-2021 01:47 PM Dkt. 32 ODMRORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

( B y : N a k a y a m a , A c t i n g C
. J . , M c K e n n a , W i l s o n , a n d E d d i n s , J J . , a n d C i r c u i t J u d g e S o m e r v i l l e , i n p l a c e o f R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J . , r e c u s e d
. )

Upon consideration of petitioners/plaintiffscounterclaim defendants-appellants’ motion for reconsideration, filed on November 17, 2021, and the record,

It is ordered that the motion for reconsideration is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 22, 2021. /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Rowena A. Somerville

2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

August 7, 2020

Order 

Clerk

August 7, 2020

160284(30)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160284

v COA: 346488

Roscommon CC: 17-007903-FC

MICHAEL ALLEN STEAD,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the fourth motion of defense counsel David Lewarchik

to extend the time for filing the Court-ordered supplemental brief is GRANTED. The brief 

will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 10, 2020. No further 

extensions will be granted.
#### Frank Paterno, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant. (Action No. 2.)

— Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Opinion by Gaynor, J.* Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks and Miller, JJ., concurred.

*

See 130 App. Div. 265.— [Rep.