alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 856 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 856

  To require that unobligated funds in the Official Mail Allowance of 
             Members be used to reduce the Federal deficit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 1995

  Mr. Zimmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require that unobligated funds in the Official Mail Allowance of 
             Members be used to reduce the Federal deficit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNOBLIGATED FUNDS TO BE USED FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.

    (a) Definitions.--For the purpose of this section--
            (1) the term ``Member'' means a Member of the House of 
        Representatives, as defined by section 311(g)(1) of the 
        Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1991 (2 U.S.C. 
        59e(g)(1)); and
            (2) the term ``Official Mail Allowance'', as used with 
        respect to a Member, means the Official Mail Allowance of such 
        Member under section 311(e) of such Act.
    (b) Deficit Reduction.--Any unobligated funds remaining in the 
Official Mail Allowance of a Member at the end of a session of Congress 
shall be deposited into the general fund of the Treasury of the United 
States and applied toward the reduction of the Federal budget deficit.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19279]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Friday, August 22, 2008, 1 p.m. Eastern Time.

Place: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of 
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes,
    2. Obligation of Funds for e-Government Application Hosting/Managed 
Services and Extension of DOI/NBC Hosting, and
    3. Obligation of Funds for Competitive Revolving Fund Online 
Registration and Payment Collection System Contract, and Sole Source 
Extension of Current Contract for Transition Period.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission 
meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides a 
recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission 
sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing 
impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by 
using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: August 15, 2008.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E8-19279 Filed 8-15-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21.01

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Concord Communications Securities Corporation
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA  01752
State of incorporation: Massachusetts

Empire Technologies, Inc.
2839 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 550
Atlanta, GA  30339
State of incorporation: Georgia

Concord Communications International, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware

CCA Holdings, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware

FirstSense Software, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware

Concord Communications FSC, Ltd.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
Organized under the laws of: Bermuda

Concord Communications (Asia Pacific) Pty, Ltd.
Level 7
53 Walker Street
N, Sydney 2060
Australia
Organized under the laws of: Australia
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6077 

To authorize the National Cyber Director to accept details from other elements of the Federal Government on nonreimbursable basis, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. NEGUSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To authorize the National Cyber Director to accept details 

from other elements of the Federal Government on nonreimbursable basis, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL CYBER DIRECTOR 

4 TO ACCEPT DETAILS ON NONREIMBURSABLE 

5 BASIS. 

6 Section 1752(e) of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry 

7 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 

8 (Public Law 116–283) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6077 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

2 (8) as subparagraphs (A) through (H), respectively, 

3 and indenting such subparagraphs two ems to the 

4 right; 

5 (2) in the matter before subparagraph (A), as 

6 redesignated by paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘The Di7 rector may’’ and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Director may’’; 

9 (3) in paragraph (1)— 

10 (A) as redesignated by paragraph (2), by 

11 redesignating subparagraphs (C) through (H) 

12 as subparagraphs (D) through (I), respectively; 

13 and 

14 (B) by inserting after subparagraph (B) 

15 the following new subparagraph (C): 

16 ‘‘(C) accept officers or employees of the 

17 United States or member of the Armed Forces 

18 on a detail from an element of the intelligence 

19 community or from another element of the Fed20 eral Government on a nonreimbursable basis, as 

21 jointly agreed to by the heads of the receiving 

22 and detailing elements, for a period not to ex23 ceed three years;’’; and 

24 (4) by adding at the end the following new 

25 paragraph: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6077 IH

1 ‘‘(2) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING DE2 TAILS.—Paragraph (1)(C) shall not be construed to 

3 impose any limitation on any other authority for re4 imbursable or nonreimbursable details. A nonreim5 bursable detail made under such paragraph shall not 

6 be considered an augmentation of the appropriations 

7 of the receiving element of the Office of the National 

8 Cyber Director.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NUMBER 13-10-00502-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

FIDEL PULIDO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Fidel Pulido, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss 

his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed 
2

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our 

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of September, 2010.
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended March  31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard J. DeGarmo


Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director


Dated: August 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2068

In Re: KEVIN WAYNE MCDANIELS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:06-cr-00036-HFF-1)

Submitted: February 20, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Wayne McDaniels, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Wayne McDaniels petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. McDaniels also moved for appointment of counsel and for refund of his appellate filing fees. Our review of the district court

docket sheet reveals that the district court ruled on McDaniels’s § 2255 motion on November 12, 2008. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We deny McDaniels’s motions for appointment of counsel and for refund of fees, and we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1912]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (08-012)]

Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 73 FR 4641, 
Notice Number 08-009, January 25, 2008.

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration published a 
document in the Federal Register of January 25, 2008, announcing a 
meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP). The document did 
not announce the meeting date.
    Correction: Date of ASAP meeting is Wednesday, February 13, 2008, 1 
p.m. to 3 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathy Dakon, Aerospace Safety 
Advisory Panel Executive Director, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0732.

    Dated: January 28, 2008.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-1912 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
Exhibit 11

                   ORION CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                   Three Months Ended               Six Months Ended
                                                                June 30,                         June 30,
                                                     ------------------------------    -------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)                   1998                1997          1998              1997
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>           <C>               <C>
BASIC:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding         27,457              27,299        27,429            27,302
                                                    ========            ========      ========          ========           
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders    $ 38,158            $ 25,381      $ 80,347          $ 54,859
                                                    ========            ========      ========          ========
                                                               
Net earnings per basis common shares                $   1.39            $   0.93      $   2.93          $   2.01
                                                    ========            ========      ========          ========          
DILUTED:
Computation of weighted average number of
common and diluted equivalent shares
outstanding:-
Weighted average number of shares outstanding         27,457              27,299        27,429            27,302
Dilutive effect of stock options and stock awards        703                 504           716               499
                                                    --------            --------      --------          --------
                                                                    
Weighted average number of common and
diluted equivalent shares                             28,160              27,803        28,145            27,801
                                                    ========            ========      ========          ========                 

Net earnings attributable to common stockholders    $ 38,158            $ 25,381      $ 80,347          $ 54,859
                                                    ========            ========      ========          ========
                                                               
Net earnings per diluted common shares              $   1.36            $   0.91      $   2.85          $   1.97
                                                    ========            ========      ========          ========
                                                               
</TABLE>







                                       33
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 738 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 738

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for 
  partial removal of limitations on contributions to candidates whose 
   opponents exceed personal contribution limitations in an election.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 1995

 Mr. Rohrabacher introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for 
  partial removal of limitations on contributions to candidates whose 
   opponents exceed personal contribution limitations in an election.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARTIAL REMOVAL OF LIMITATIONS ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO 
              CANDIDATES WHOSE OPPONENTS USE LARGE AMOUNTS OF PERSONAL 
              FUNDS.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) If a candidate for Federal office makes contributions or 
expenditures from the personal funds of the candidate totaling more 
than $1,000 with respect to an election, the candidate shall so notify 
the Commission and each other candidate in the election. The 
notification shall be made in writing within 48 hours after the 
contribution or expenditure involved is made.
    ``(2) In any case described in paragraph (1), any person who is 
otherwise permitted under this Act to make contributions to such other 
candidate may make contributions in excess of any otherwise applicable 
limitation on such contributions, to the extent that the total of such 
excess contributions accepted by such other candidate does not exceed 
the total of contributions or expenditures from personal funds referred 
to in paragraph (1).''.

SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES MADE 
              IMMEDIATELY BEFORE AN ELECTION.

    Section 304 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
434) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Any person, political committee, or organization which makes 
an independent expenditure or commitment to purchase products or 
services to be used in the last 7 days before an election, shall so 
notify each candidate in the election. The notification shall be made 
in writing at least 48 hours before the expenditure or commitment is 
made.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.64**

**SCHEDULE OF PARTIES TO FORM OF**

**EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

Each of the parties identified in the table below is party to an executive employment agreement with Remington Arms Company, Inc. (the “Company”) substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 10.63 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008. Each party’s employment agreement is substantially the same except for such party’s position,            hire date, start date and base salaries (which range from $225,000 to $350,000).

 
| **Employee Name**    | **Position**            | **Hire Date** | **Start Date** |
|----------------------|-------------------------|---------------|----------------|
| Marc Hill            | Chief Marketing Officer | 12/15/08      | 12/15/08       |
| Paul A. Miller       | Executive Chairman      | 10/31/08      | 11/1/08        |
| Fredric E. Roth, Jr. | General Counsel         | 6/16/08       | 6/16/08        |
#### Frank R. YEATMAN v. Charles Henry LANZ, Sr., et al.

No. 2089.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

April 10, 1940.

Pujo, Hardin & Porter and Clement M. Moss, all of Lake Charles, for appellants.

.McCoy & King, of Lake Charles, for appellee.

LeBLANC, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the case of Henry G. Morgan v. Charles Henry Lanz Sr. et al., La.App., 195 So. 128, it is ordered that the judgment appealed from herein be and the same is hereby amended by decreasing the amount of the award made to the plaintiff, Frank R. Yeatman, for the use and benefit of his minor daughter, Stella Elizabeth Yeatman, from the sum of $4,000 to the sum of $3,500, and as thus amended, the same be affirmed. Appellants to pay all costs.
Exhibit 32.1

DSP GROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of DSP Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Eliyahu Ayalon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: March 13, 2009



/s/ Eliyahu AyalonEliyahu Ayalon Chief Executive
Officer
#### In re Estate of Willie C. Erwin. John L. Barber Jr., Executor, appellant, v. Roscoe H. Erwin et al., appellees.

296 N. W. 330

Filed February 4, 1941.

No. 30930.

*22
      *Chatt & Ellenberger,*for appellant.

*Carroll O. Stauffer, contra.*

Heard before Simmons, C. J., Eberly, Paine and Messmore, JJ., and Landis and Munday, District Judges.

Landis, District Judge.

This is an action where an executor applied to the district court for a license to sell real estate to pay debts, which was denied, and the executor appeals.

. In the testate estate of Willie C. Erwin, deceased, the executor, John L. Barber, Jr., found, after the order allowing claims and barring future demands was entered, that there was insufficient personal property to pay the creditors and costs of administration.

The sole asset available for the payment of claims outside of the personalty, which amounts to enough to pay the costs and expenses of administration, was 240 acres in Burt county, Nebraska, encumbered by a real estate mortgage in the principal sum of $15,000.

The executor properly applied for a license to sell the land and subject whatever equity there might be to the payment of the creditors of the estate.

When the hearing was had on the application in the district court, every creditor of the estate, with an unpaid claim, filed in writing with the court a request that the *23application be dismissed, showing the court that they were not at this time demanding that their claims be paid and that a sale had at this time under present economic conditions would cause a sacrifice of the land for a mere fraction of its actual value.

The primary object of the application is to sell the land for the payment of the claims of the creditors. It is brought for the benefit of the creditors. But the district court had the unusual condition of those for whom the benefit of the action was brought, specifically asking that the application be dismissed and that they did not want the benefits at this time sought for them by the executor. It is elemental that these creditors should have that right. The application was properly dismissed by the court.

The dismissal herein in no way bars future action either by the district court upon due application and showing by the executor, or by the county court which has jurisdiction to require the executor to apply to the district court for a license to sell real estate for the payment of debts. *In re Estate of McLean,*136 Neb. 353, 285 N. W. 915.

Affirmed.