alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2263

In Re: REGINALD L. KEENE, SR.; In Re: KAREN L.

KEENE,

Debtors.

_________________________

REGINALD L. KEENE, SR.; KAREN L. KEENE,

Debtors - Appellants,

versus

DAVID CHARLES,

Creditor - Appellee.

FRANK J. SANTORO, Trustee,

Amicus Curiae.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-16-4, BK-91-42512-S)

Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: April 30, 1999

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Richard G. Poinsett, Linda Weston Coppinger, LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD

G. POINSETT, Hampton, Virginia, for Appellants. Sheryl Lee Brindle,

ALEXANDER P. SMITH & ASSOCIATES, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Frank J. Santoro, Trustee, Karen M. Crowley, MARCUS, SANTORO, KOZAK

& MELVIN, P.C., Portsmouth, Virginia, for Amicus Curiae.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Reginald and Karen Keene appeal from the district court’s

order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying their motion

to enforce the confirmation and discharge orders and for a court

order releasing the lien of David Charles, a creditor in their

bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and the opinions of the bankruptcy court and the district court and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s

reasoning. See Keene v. Charles, Nos. CA-98-16-4; BK-91-42512-S

(E.D. Va. July 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

         The Board of Directors  and  employees of  Northwest  Equity  Corp.(the
"Company"),  the holding  company of Northwest  Savings Bank (the  "Bank"),  are
proud to present  the fifth  annual  report  since the Bank's  stock  conversion
consummated  in October 1994. The conversion  provided  substantially  increased
capital to strengthen,  expand and diversify the operations of the Bank, provide
future access to capital markets,  and attract and retain personnel  through the
employee stock ownership plan and other stock benefit programs. It also provided
the ability for the Board,  employees,  depositors and others the opportunity to
become  shareholders  of the  Company and  thereby  participate  directly in the
future  growth and success of the Bank.  That  participation  became a practical
reality  when the Board of  Directors  declared  the first  dividend of $.07 per
share to shareholders of record on April 28, 1995, and the Company's  history of
dividends has continued  from that date to the most recent  declaration of $0.17
per share to shareholders of record on April 30, 1999.

         I am  pleased  to  report  that  fiscal  1999 was a  landmark  year for
Northwest Equity Corp. The Company achieved record earnings,  the highest in the
63 years since the original  association  was founded in 1936.  Earnings for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1999,  increased to a record $1,133,000,  despite an
increase of $276,000 in the provision for loan losses to $376,000 for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1999, from $100,000 for the for the fiscal year ended March
31, 1998. The increase in the provision for loan losses  reflects the settlement
of the case involving a large commercial loan first reported under Part II, Item
1.  Legal  Proceedings  in the Form  10QSB  dated  September  30,  1996,  and in
subsequent 10QSB and 10KSB reports. Return on average assets increased to 1.16 %
for the fiscal  year  ended  March 31,  1999,  from 1.15% for the prior year and
return  on  average  equity  decreased  9.59 % from  9.85%  for the same  years.
Earnings  per share were  $1.45 for the  twelve  months  ended  March 31,  1999,
compared to $1.44 for the twelve months ended March 31, 1998. As  non-performing
loans to gross loans  decreased  1.44% to 0.32% at March 31, 1999, from 1.76% at
March 31,  1998,  I fully  expect  that the loan loss  provision  will  decrease
substantially in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2000, and that,  consequently,
the solid performance of the Bank will continue into the coming fiscal year.

         On February 17, 1999,  the Board  announced  that it had entered into a
definitive  agreement  and plan of  merger  with  Bremer  Financial  Corporation
("Bremer"),  for Bremer to acquire  Northwest  stock in a transaction  valued at
$24.00 in cash for each share outstanding.




                                      _/s/Brian L. Beadle______
                                      Brian L. Beadle
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       3
<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0100

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY CRAIG WEIMER

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 14, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 6 2024

05/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0100
EXHIBIT 12.1

PROTECTION ONE, INC.  COMBINATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES  (IN THOUSANDS)  (UNAUDITED)

|                                                      |                                                                 | PROTECTION ONE   |        
|----------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------
|
|Earnings                                              |                                                                 |                  |        
|                                                      | Pretax loss from continuing operations before accounting change |                  | $      
|                                                      | Adjustments                                                     |                  |        
|                                                      |                                                                 | Fixed charges(B) |        
|                                                      |                                                                 |                  |        
|Earnings as adjusted(A)                               |                                                                 |                  | (39,928
|                                                      |                                                                 |                  |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (A) divided by (B) |                                                                 |                  | (0.90  
|Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges               |                                                                 |                  | 84,326 

---



QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of the Application of Frank L. Graves for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted. Present-—Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
#### Andrew J. Kerwin, Jr., v. Alfred Post and Another.

Motion denied on terms stated in order.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Form 10-K Rule 13a-14(b)
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934, as amended; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  /s/

Barry L.
    PennypackerBarry L. Pennypacker
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Gardner Denver, Inc.
    March 2, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

A meeting of the Exporters’ Textile Advisory Committee will be held on September 24, 2008 from 12:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.at Stonefield Josephson, 2049 Century Park E, Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA 90067.

The Committee provides advice and guidance to Department officials on the identification and surmounting of barriers to the expansion of textile exports, and on methods of encouraging textile firms to participate in export expansion.

The Committee functions solely as an advisory body in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

The meeting will be open to the public with a limited number of seats available. For further information contact Kim Bang-Nguyen at (202) 482-4805. Minutes of all ETAC meetings are posted at otexa.ita.doc.gov.

Dated: August 12, 2008.

R. Matthew Priest,

Chairman, Committee for Implementation of Textile Agreements.

[FR Doc. E8-19091 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BLS Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Gary Prager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BLS Media, Inc., and will be retained by BLS Media, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Gary
      PragerGary Prager
                  Chief Financial
      Officer
                  November
      12, 2008
18300.

#### Ross *v.*Griffin *et al.*

Submitted July 13, 1953

Decided September 14, 1953.

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Where, as here, a motion for new trial is pending in the lower court and remains undisposed of, plaintiff in error is precluded from coming to this court upon a bill of exceptions based on the final decree, as there can be no final judgment so long as a valid motion for new trial is pending, and, for this reason, the writ of error must be dismissed as premature. Code (Ann. Supp.), § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 730); *Darden*v. *Roberts,*193 *Ga.*637 (19 S. E. 2d 270).

2. In the present case the final decree was vacated May 13, 1953, and a new decree entered thereon nunc pro tunc as of May 8, 1953. The plaintiff in error tendered the bill of exceptions thereto on May 23, 1953, in accordance with Code (Ann. Supp.) § 6-902 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 734), and on *the same date the*defendants in error filed their motion for new trial. Under these circumstances, leave is granted to the plaintiff in error to treat the official copy of the bill of exceptions on file in the trial court as exceptions pendente lite.

*Writ oj error dismissed with direction.*

*All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P.J., not participating.*

*23
      *Erie M. Donalson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Conger & Conger, J. Willis Conger,*contra.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Exhibit 11


                   ORION CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                                   (UNAUDITED)



                                                       Three Months Ended          Six Months Ended
                                                            June 30,                    June 30,
                                                     ----------------------     ----------------------
(In millions, except for per share amounts)            1999          1998          1999        1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic:
<S>                                                <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Weighted average number of shares outstanding           27.0          27.5          27.0          27.4
                                                   =========     =========     =========     =========
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders   $    42.5     $    38.2     $   (50.0)    $    80.3
                                                   =========     =========     =========     =========
Net earnings per basic common shares               $    1.57     $    1.39     $   (1.85)    $    2.93
                                                   =========     =========     =========     =========

Diluted:
Computation of weighted average number of
   common and diluted equivalent shares
   outstanding:-
   Weighted average number of shares outstanding        27.0          27.5          27.0          27.4
   Dilutive effect of stock options and stock awards     0.2           0.7           0.0           0.7
                                                   ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
   Weighted average number of common and
      diluted equivalent shares                         27.2          28.2          27.0          28.1
                                                   =========     =========     =========     =========

Net earnings attributable to common stockholders   $    42.5     $    38.2     $   (50.0)    $    80.3
                                                   =========     =========     =========     =========

Net earnings per diluted common shares             $    1.56     $    1.36     $   (1.85)    $    2.85
                                                   =========     =========     =========     =========
</TABLE>

The average  shares for the six months ended June 30, 1999  excludes  equivalent
shares of 0.2 million in the  computation  of diluted  earnings per common share
because to include them would have been antidilutive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           10301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    41201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      78424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                145835
<PP&E>                                          102459
<DEPRECIATION>                                   51039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  202074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            36331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                      149446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    202074
<SALES>                                         340148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                340148
<CGS>                                           232963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   232963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                111580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (4745)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3722
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3722
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Paradigm  Medical  Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period  ending  December 31, 2007,
as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Raymond P.L.  Cannefax,  President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

      (a)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
           the Company.




                                        /s/ Raymond P.L. Cannefax
                                        --------------------------------------
Date: May 15, 2008                      Raymond P.L. Cannefax
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         735,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,940,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (319,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 18,139,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,150,000
<PP&E>                                     139,267,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (45,046,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             156,405,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,725,000
<BONDS>                                     50,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,819,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  76,995,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               156,405,000
<SALES>                                     57,411,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,411,000
<CGS>                                       39,641,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,247,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                82,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,932,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,150,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,163,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,163,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,003,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.63


January 16, 2016


FIRST Amendment to OPTION Agreement
 
This First Amendment (“Amendment”) to the Intelsat S. A. Nonqualified Option Award Agreement (“Option Agreement”) between STEPHEN ROBERT SPENGLER (the “Participant”) and Intelsat S.A. (the “Company”), dated as of May 1, 2013, is entered into by the Company and made as of December 15, 2015.
 
WHEREAS, pursuant to its authority under the Intelsat S.A. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the Option Agreement, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has approved this amendment to the Option Agreement to reflect an Exercise Price (as defined in the Option Agreement) equal to the closing price of a common share of the Company on December 15, 2015, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions reporting system.
 
It is hereby agreed as follows:
 
1.                 The last sentence of Section 1(a) of the Option Agreement is amended to read as follows:  
“The Exercise Price shall be $3.77 per Option Share.” 
2.                 In accordance with Section 14(b) of the Intelsat S.A. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, the effectiveness of this Amendment is subject to the approval of the Company’s shareholders at the Company’s 2016 annual general meeting of shareholders. For the avoidance of doubt, if shareholder approval is not obtained, then this Amendment shall be void ab initio and of no force and effect.
3.                 As amended and modified by this Amendment, the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
4.                 If there is any conflict between the terms of the Option Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment as of December 15, 2015.




INTELSAT S.A.
               
		
	By:
	/s/ Michelle V. Bryan


Michelle V. Bryan 
Executive Vice President, General   
Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer








/s/ Stephen Spengler
Stephen Spengler


Accepted on January 16, 2016
#### Norman W. Daulton v. State.

No. 25070.

January 3, 1951.

*Dickson & Balch,*Seymour, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor on U. S. Highway No. 82 in Baylor County, which was a dry area. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $500.00, and confinement in the county jail for 30 days.

The state’s attorney before this court concedes that the conviction must be reversed for lack of proof showing that the appellant transported whisky on U. S. Highway No. 82 in Baylor County, Texas, as alleged in the complaint and information. With this view we are inclined to agree.

The state having alleged the particular highway upon which the liquor was transported was bound to sustain that allegation by proof. See Staley v. State, 154 Tex. Cr. R. 546, 229 S.W. (2d) *336170; Vaught v. State, 145 Texas Crim. Rep. 623, 171 S.W. (2d) 128.

For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.