alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48204-48205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, September 10, 2008, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Halsey, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-2347 or e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0d8d1dcc3d5c9c0daf0dfc2df9ed4dfd59ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e48c858897819d948ea48b968bca808b81ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a> or check the web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting topic will be ``The Federal 
Historic Preservation Program.''
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Pat Halsey at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the

[[Page 48205]]

presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public comment 
will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Pat Halsey 
at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will also be 
available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC on August 12, 2008.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-19062 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SECTION OF THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,055,501
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          33,499
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        46,524
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,135,524
<COMMON>                                        85,474
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      192,717
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             63,698
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 341,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           467,452
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  96,675
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     15,652
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   475
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 213,381
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,135,524
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      109,238
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,397
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      48,792
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      64,189
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         45,049
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 355
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  45,404
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        20,524
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,880
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   24,880
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        30,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,611
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          55,178
<EPS-BASIC>                                     24,880
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   24,880


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

             STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       2000       1999        1998
                                                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                                   <C>         <C>         <C>
Weighted Average Number of Shares
  of Common Stock Outstanding                         15,415      15,318      15,116
Net Effect of Dilutive Stock Options                    --          --          --
                                                    --------    --------    --------

Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                   15,415      15,318      15,116
                                                    ========    ========    ========

Net Loss                                            $(32,405)   $(13,309)   $(11,830)

Less Accrued Convertible Preferred Stock Dividend     (2,137)     (1,980)       (541)
                                                    --------    --------    --------

Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders        $(34,542)   $(15,289)   $(12,371)
                                                    ========    ========    ========

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share                $  (2.24)   $  (1.00)   $  (0.82)
                                                    ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


SUBSIDIARY                                               STATE OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                                          <C>
Universal Outdoor China, Inc.                                    Delaware
Universal Outdoor Management Corp.                               Delaware
Universal Outdoor (NY III) Adv. Acq. Corp.                       Delaware
Universal Outdoor (NY II) Advertising Acquisition Corp.          Delaware
Universal Outdoor (NY) Advertising Acquisition Corp.             Delaware
Revere Holding Corp.                                             Delaware
Southeast Vista Holding Co.                                      Delaware
Quantum Structures & Designs, Inc.                               Illinois
Visual Consultants, Inc.                                         Tennessee
Tanner Acquisition Corp.                                         Delaware
Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc.                              Delaware
Matthew Acquisition Corp.                                        Delaware
Transportation Media, Inc.                                       Illinois
Revere Acquisition Corp.                                         Delaware
HCA, Inc.                                                        Illinois
Visual Outdoor Advertising Inc.                                  Tennessee
Revere Billboard, Inc.                                           Delaware
Revere National Corp.                                            Delaware
Mall Media Acquisition Corp.                                     Delaware
Superior Outdoor Structures, Inc.                                Illinois
Revere National Corp. of Wilmington                              Delaware

</TABLE>
                                             32

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                       <C>
Revere National Corp. of Philadelphia                            Delaware
Revere National Corp. of Pennsylvania                            Delaware

</TABLE>



                                                33
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

LISA APPLEGATE, *

* No. 16-379V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Filed: April 24, 2017

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Attorneys’ fees and costs

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner; 

Amy P. Kokot, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On April 9, 2017, petitioner moved for final attorneys’ fees and costs in the 

above-captioned matter. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent 

raised no objections to the attorneys’ fees sought. Resp’t’s Resp., filed April 21, 

2017, at 1.

On March 24, 2016, Lisa Applegate filed a petition for compensation

alleging that the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“TDaP”) vaccine, which she

received on May 5, 2014, caused her to suffer Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) 

and Bell’s Palsy. The undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to 

petitioner based on the parties’ joint stipulation. Decision, issued Feb. 16, 2017, 

2017 WL 972105.

 

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. 

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of 

medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any 

redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

Because petitioner received compensation, petitioner is entitled to an award 

of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). Petitioner seeks a total of

$18,065.36 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In compliance with General Order No. 9, 

petitioner states that she advanced no monies for reimbursable costs in pursuit of 

his claim. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $18,065.36 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Jeffrey S. Pop, of Jeffrey S. 

Pop, Attorney at Law, for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs 

available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the 

clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing 

of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Shareholders of Protection One, Inc.:

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Form 10-K of our report dated March 10, 2000, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement File Numbers 033-83494,
033-99220, 033-95702, 033-97542, 333-02828, 333-02892, 333-20245, 333-24493,
333-50383, 333-64021, 333-77295 and 333-30328.


Arthur Andersen LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 28, 2000
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 3, 2016

NO. 03-15-00760-CR

Ronnie Jean Davis, Sr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for DNA testing.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Notice is hereby given that Rustic Canyon Ventures SBIC, L.P., 2425 Olympic Blvd., Suite 6050 West, Santa Monica, CA 90404, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730 (2008)). Rustic Canyon Ventures SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity security financing to Fulcrum BioEnergy, Inc., 2425 Olympic Blvd., Suite 560 East, Santa Monica, CA 90404. The financing is contemplated for development and expansion of production facilities and for general corporate purposes.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(l) of the Regulations because US Renewables Group HoldCo III, LLC (“USRG”), an Associate of Rustic Canyon Ventures SBIC, L.P., owns more than ten percent of Fulcrum BioEnergy, Inc. Therefore, Fulcrum BioEnergy, Inc., is also considered an Associate of Rustic Canyon Ventures SBIC, L.P., as defined at 13 CFR 107.50 of the SBIC Regulations.

                    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration,                           ( print page 48007)                        409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.                

A. Joseph Shepard,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. E8-18798 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
#### EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY; City of El Paso; State of Texas and Office of Public Utility Counsel, Appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION of TEXAS; ASARCO, Inc.; and Phelps Dodge Refining Corporation, Appellees.

No. 03-93-00661-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

March 13, 1996.

Before CARROLL, C.J., and POWERS, ABOUSSIE, JONES, KIDD and B.A. SMITH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss. The parties’ joint motion is granted. Tex.R.App.P. 59(a)(1)(A).

The judgment of this Court, dated July 12, 1995, is withdrawn; the judgment of the trial court is vacated and the cause dismissed in accord with the settlement agreement of the parties. The majority and dissenting opinions of this Court dated July 12,1995, are not withdrawn.
EXHIBIT 10.45 

 

**AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO**

**EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT**

 

**THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT** (“Amendment No. 4”) is made and entered into as of the 8th day of December, 2003, by and between **THE PANTRY, INC.**, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and **PETER J. SODINI** (the“Employee”). 

 

 

**W I T N E S S E T H:**

 

**WHEREAS,** the Corporation and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 1997 (the “Original Agreement”); and 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Corporation and the Employee entered into Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement on April 1, 1999;

 

**WHEREAS,** the Corporation and the Employee entered intoAmendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement on September 21, 2001; 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Corporation and the Employee entered into Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement on August 28, 2002; and 

 

**WHEREAS,** the Corporation and the Employee desire to amend further the Original Agreement to extend the term of such Employment Agreement ashereinafter set forth. 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE,** in considerationof the mutual terms and conditions set forth below and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 

 

**1.**    Section 1 of the Original Agreement is hereby amended to reflect an employment termcommencing on October 1, 1997 and ending on September 30, 2006. 

 

**2.**    Sections 5.3(b)(ii) and (iii) are deleted and the following sections are inserted in lieu thereof: 

 

(ii) an amount equal to his then current monthly salary (less applicable withholdings) for eighteen (18) months, payable in monthlyinstallments or, at the Corporation’s option, in a lump sum amount; 

 

(iii) unless the Employee obtains medical insurance coverage from a subsequent employer, then he may continue to participate for eighteen (18) months, to the extent permitted by the plan, in the medical insurance planin which he participated on the effective termination of employment date. The Corporation will pay or, at the Corporation’s option, reimburse the Employee for the premiums actually paid, to continue coverage under the medical insurance planduring the period. In the event that the Employee is ineligible to participate in such medical insurance plan following termination of employment, the Corporation shall 

arrange to provide the Employee with substantially similar medical insurance benefits, at no greatercost to the Employee than the cost he paid for such benefits immediately prior to termination. 

 

**3.**    Except as amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** this Amendment has been duly executed as of theday and year set forth above. 

 

 
**THE PANTRY, INC.** By: /S/    STEVEN J. FERREIRA   Name: Steven J. Ferreira  Title: SVP Administration              
/S/    PETER J. SODINI
  PETER J. SODINI
 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended June 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000075053
<NAME>                        D-lanz Development Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Eladio CRUZ a/k/a Lado Eladio Cruz, Appellant.

No. 02-2824.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 28, 2003.

Decided March 21, 2003.

Esther Salas (argued), Lisa M. Mack, Federal Public Defender, Newark, NJ, for Appellant.

Christopher J. Christie, United States Attorney, George S. Leone, Chief, Appeals Division, Sabrina G. Comizzoli (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for Appellee.

Before SCIRICA, GREENBERG, and GIBSON,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

Eladio Cruz appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered June 28, 2002, on his plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of crack cocaine. The district court determined that his total offense level was 34 which with his criminal history category of VII yielded a sentencing range of 262 to 327 months. The court sentenced him to a 262-month custodial term to be followed by a five-year term of supervised release.

Cruz appeals, contending that “the [district] court erred in denying [his] downward departure motion for over-statement of criminal history because it failed to employ the applicable analytical framework, instead relying upon a skewed view of plea agreement stipulations and its assignment to [him] of responsibility for the sins of his son.” Br. at 11. His son is a co-defendant in this case. The government answers that we lack jurisdiction because the district court explicitly recognized that it had the authority to depart but declined to do so.

We agree with the government and thus conclude that we do not have jurisdiction. *See United States v. McQuilkin,*97 F.3d 723, 729-30 (3d Cir.1996). Consequently, we will dismiss this appeal.