alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 6048 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from taking certain 

actions with respect to the clinical labor price, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2021 

Mr. RUSH (for himself and Mr. BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from taking certain actions with respect to the clinical 

labor price, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Stability for 

5 Patients and Providers Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6048 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN 

2 LABOR PRICE UPDATES UNDER THE 2022 

3 PHYSICIAN FEE SCHEDULE; REPORT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

6 shall maintain clinical labor prices under the 2022 physi7 cian fee schedule and not take any action to implement, 

8 finalize, or enforce the clinical labor price updates of the 

9 final rule published by the Centers for Medicare & Med10 icaid Services on November 19, 2021, entitled ‘‘Medicare 

11 Program; CY 2022 Payment Policies Under the Physician 

12 Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment Poli13 cies; Medicare Shared Savings Program Requirements; 

14 Provider Enrollment Regulation Updates; Provider and 

15 Supplier Prepayment and Post-Payment Medical Review 

16 Requirements’’. 

17 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 12 months after the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 

19 and Human Services shall submit to Congress a report 

20 on the physician fee schedule under the Medicare program 

21 under section 1848 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

22 1395w–4), including— 

23 (1) an analysis of provider reimbursement 

24 under such physician fee schedule and whether or 

25 not such reimbursement has sufficiently taken into 

26 account medical inflation over the last 20 years; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 6048 IH

1 (2) an analysis of whether significant annual 

2 changes in provider reimbursement are a cause of 

3 site-of-service migration and disruptions in patient 

4 access and cost-sharing; and 

5 (3) based on paragraphs (1) and (2), rec6 ommendations for reforming such fee schedule to 

7 minimize significant annual changes in provider re8 imbursement and appropriately account for inflation 

9 updates. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Logistics Agency 

# AGENCY:

Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Notice of membership—2008 DLA PRB. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of members to the Defense Logistics Agency Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB). The publication of PRB composition is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial review of Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and makes recommendations to the Director, Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), with respect to pay level adjustments and performance awards and other actions related to management of the SES cadre. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         September 26, 2008.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6221. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Julie Brown, SES Program Manager, Human Resources (J-1), Defense Logistics Agency, Department of Defense, (703) 767-5041. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the following are the names and titles of DLA career executives appointed to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, which begins on September 26, 2008.                           ( print page 49447)    

*PRB Chair:*                     Major General Arthur Morrill III, USAF.                 

*Members:*                     Mr. Jeffrey Neal, Director, Human Resources. Mr. Larry Glasco, Deputy Director, Logistics Operations & Readiness. Mr. James McClaugherty, Deputy Commander, Defense Supply Center Columbus.                 

Robert T. Dail, 

USA, Director, Defense Logistics Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-19252 Filed 8-20-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3620-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                           5
                                                     
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                       205,411
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                455,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  36,211
<INVENTORY>                                                   56,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             925,310
<PP&E>                                                     2,265,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                             1,128,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             3,021,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        798,327
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                  545,000
<COMMON>                                                      37,347
<OTHER-SE>                                                 1,435,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               3,021,213
<SALES>                                                    3,364,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           5,278,924
<CGS>                                                      1,210,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              1,210,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           4,911,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              36,211
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            71,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              367,871 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (49,670)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          275,707 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 219,357 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    .06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    .06 
        
 

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74660, 33-74662, 33-74664, 33-78406, 33-88780, 333-04268, 333-22973, 333-22975, 333-24545, 333-56359, 333-56361, 333-73409, 333-73411, 333-33114, 333-33116, 333-56790, 333-56792, 333-33110, 333-82790, 333-82808, 333-103299, 333-113083, 333-123433, and 333-132647) of MapInfo Corporation and subsidiaries of our report****dated December 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K**.**
 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany, New York
#### Christian F. Hetzel, Appellant, v. Magdalene Weimann and Max Weimann, Respondents.

Judgment and order of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TODD FABIAN SIMMONS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3988

September 1, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary M. Handsel, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, MORRIS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT (15) 


                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP









To CMS Energy Corporation:

We are aware that CMS Energy  Corporation  has  incorporated by reference in its
Registration  Statements No. 33-29681, No. 33-47629, No. 33-60007, No. 33-61595,
No. 33-60795, No. 33-62573,  No. 333-32229,  No. 333-63229,  No. 333-68937,  No.
333-75805 and No.  333-76347 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998,
which  includes our report dated May 11, 1999  covering  the  unaudited  interim
financial  information  contained  therein.  Pursuant  to  Regulation  C of  the
Securities Act of 1933, that report is not considered a part of the registration
statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by
our firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



                                                        /s/  Arthur Andersen LLP


Detroit, Michigan,
     May 11, 1999.
#### Brink’s Chicago City Express Co. v. W. A. Hendricks.

1. *Trover—Against Warehouseman Who, by Mistake, Delivers Goods to a Wrong*Person.—An action of trover lies against a warehouseman who, by mistake; delivers goods to a wrong person.

Trover.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Area N. Waterman, Judge presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1901.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed November 11, 1902.

This is an action in trover to recover the value of certain *155property alleged to have been left for storage with appellant, as a warehouseman, in September, 1894.

Appellee paid storage charges for the goods in question and other property stored with appellant, from September, 1894, to February 20,1897. In June, 1896, appellant wrote informing appellee that October 9,1894, it had shipped the articles in controversy and had since been informed by the Illinois Central Railroad Company that they had been sold for charges in August, 1895. Upon the trial it was stipulated that the value of the lost articles was $600, and judgment was rendered in appellee’s favor for that amount.

Grant If swell, attorney for appellant.

Beach & Beach, attorneys for appellee.

Mr. Justice Freeman

delivered the opinion of the court.

The ground upon which it is sought to reverse this judgment is that *“*there was not a sufficient showing on the part of the plaintiff with reference to the matter of demand.” As the abstract fails to disclose the character of much of the evidence, we ought to presume that the judgment of the Circuit Court is correct and would so appear if the evidence had been properly abstracted for our consideration. It does, however, appear that there is evidence tending to show a demand made before suit was brought; and it appears that the record shows appellant had admitted it received the goods for storage, retained them in its custody for a considerable time, collected storage charges therefor, negligently delivered them without orders and by mistake at the wrong place, where they were finally sold as unclaimed property to pay charges, and were thus wholly lost. An action of trover lies against a warehouseman who, by mistake, delivers goods to a wrong person, and he will be responsible for the loss as upon a wrongful conversion. I. *&*St. L. R. R. Co. v. Herndon et al., 81 Ill. 143-146; P. & P. U. Ry. Co. v. Buckley, 114 Ill. 337; Diamond Joe Line v. Carter, 76 Ill. App. 470.

The judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.

Mr. Justice Waterman took no part.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6951

DEMETRIUS J. WADE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director for Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:19-cv-00763-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: November 22, 2021 Decided: January 20, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, WYNN, Circuit Judge, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius J. Wade, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius J. Wade seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wade has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Wade’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             386
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   715
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              729
<BONDS>                                        148,767
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (98,606)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,890
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                              551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order entered October 10, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00518-CR

AGEAK M CHOL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-30952-T

ORDER

The clerk’s record reflects appellant is indigent and requested the reporter’s record on 

May 9, 2018. The reporter’s record was due August 24, 2018. When it was not filed, we 

notified court reporter Trashuna Salaam by postcard dated August 28, 2018 that it was overdue 

and directed her to file (1) the reporter’s record, (2) written verification that no hearing were 

recorded, or (3) written verification that appellant had not requested the reporter’s record by 

September 27, 2018. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and we have had no 

communication from Ms. Salaam.

We ORDER Trashuna Salaam to file the complete reporter’s record by October 24, 

2018. Should Ms. Salaam fail to file the reporter’s record by that date, the Court will take 
whatever remedies it has available to ensure this appeal proceeds in a timely fashion, including 

ordering Ms. Salaam not sit until the complete reporter’s record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Livia Liu Francis, 

Presiding Judge, 283rd Judicial District Court; Trashuna Salaam, official court reporter, 283rd

Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 802

To prohibit payment of Federal retirement benefits, except in certain cases,

to those who are not retired as defined under the Social Security Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1995

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform and Oversight and, in addition, to the Committees on National Security, House Oversight, the Judiciary, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To prohibit payment of Federal retirement benefits, except

in certain cases, to those who are not retired as defined

under the Social Security Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RETIREMENT BENEFITS.

4 The United States Government shall not pay retire5 ment benefits to or through any person who ceases United

6 States Government employment after the year 2000 unless

7 that person is retired as defined under the Social Security

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.). The preceding sentence does
2

•HR 802 IH

1 not apply to former public safety officers (as defined in

2 section 1204(7) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe

3 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(7)) and former

4 members of the Armed Forces who have been exposed to

5 actual combat dangers as a result of hostile activities by

6 opposing forces.

Æ
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated June 29, 2017 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2017.

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of WNS (Holdings) Limited on Form S-8 (File No. 333-136168, File No. 333-157356, File No. 333-176849, File No. 333-191416 and File
No. 333-214042).



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON INDIA LLP
|                            
|Mumbai, India               
|June 29, 2017
#### Adeline ANTOINE v. INTERURBAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Inc.

No. 4125.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 16, 1932.

Guión & Upton, of New Orleans, and Peter-man, Dear & Peterman, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellee.

McGregor, j.

The facts of this case are the same as those in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated (La. App.) 140 So. 151, this day decided. The plaintiff, Adeline Antoine, is the widow of Milton Antoine, who lost his life in the collision, and she has brought suit for $15,000 damages for his death. This case was tried and submitted on the same evidence as was the case of Peter Antoine, and the same judgment was rendered by the lower court, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Eor the reasons assigned in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all the costs of both courts to be paid by the plaintiff, appellant.
**EXHIBIT21**

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES**

**Name of 100% OwnedSubsidiaries and Jurisdiction in Which Organized**
| 1.  | FEI Technologies Inc. (Oregon) (established January  2007) |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.  | FEI Electron Optics International B.V. (Netherlands)       |
| 3.  | FEI Deutschland GmbH (Germany)                             |
| 4.  | FEI Company Japan Ltd. (Japan)                             |
| 5.  | Focused Electrons and Ions (FEI) AG (Switzerland)          |
| 6.  | FEI Czech Republic s.r.o. (Czech Republic)                 |
| 7.  | FEI Hong Kong Co. Ltd. (Hong Kong)                         |
| 8.  | FEI Company of U.S.A. (SE Asia) P.t.e. Ltd.  (Singapore)   |
| 9.  | FEI Italia S.r.l. (Italy)                                  |
| 10. | FEI Electron Optics B.V. (Netherlands)                     |
| 11. | FEI France SAS (France)                                    |
| 12. | FEI Europe B.V. (Netherlands)                              |
| 13. | FEI UK Ltd. (United Kingdom)                               |
| 14. | FEI Systems Canada Inc. (Canada)                           |
| 15. | FEI Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)                           |
| 16. | FEI Australia Pty Ltd. (Australia)                         |

 

**Name ofSubsidiaries less than 100% Owned**
| 1. | Charged Particle Beam Technology Latin America S.A.  de C.V. (Mexico) |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | FEI Systems (Thailand) Company, Limited (Thailand)                    |

 

----