alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1780-DR]


Texas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas (FEMA-1780-DR), dated July 24, 2008, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: July 31, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include Individual 
Assistance in the following areas among those areas determined to have 
been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by 
the President in his declaration of July 24, 2008.

    Cameron, Hidalgo, and Willacy Counties for Individual Assistance 
and debris removal (Category A) under the Public Assistance program 
(already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], 
including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program.)
    Aransas, Bexar, Brooks, Calhoun, Jim Wells, Kenedy, Kleberg, 
Nueces, Refugio, San Patricio, Starr, and Victoria Counties for 
debris removal (Category A) under the Public Assistance program 
(already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], 
including direct Federal assistance, under the Public Assistance 
program.)

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared 
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-18440 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  the  undersigned  President  and  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company certifies that, to his knowledge:

      1.    The  Company's  Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the
            "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



                                           /s/ Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Denis M. O'Donnell, M.D.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Dated:  August 10, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20502

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ANGEL SOCRATES MAKRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(CR-H-93-107-1)

May 22, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Makris timely appeals his convictions and sentences for wire fraud and for

transporting counterfeit securities in international and interstate commerce, in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2314. He contends that the district court erred, i nter alia

, in denying

his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. That motion was based on the grounds that at the

time of entry of the plea, Makris was mentally incompetent. A close review of the record,

with particular focus on the hearing on Makris’ post-conviction motion, reflects the very1 United States v. Makris , No. CR-H-93-107 (S.D.Tex. Sept. 22, 1994).

2 See United States v. Calverley

, 37 F.3d 160 (5t h Cir. 1994), cert

. d enied

, 115 S.Ct.

1266 (1995).

3 United States v. Noe , 634 F.2d 860 (5th Cir.), cert

. denied , 454 U.S. 876 (1981).

2 c areful handling of this matter by the trial judge, and discloses no reversible error i n the

finding and conclusion that Makris was mentally competent at the time he entered his guilty

plea. 1 For the first time on appeal, Makris maintains that his guilty plea was entered

involuntarily. The record is devoid of plain error on this claim and it is rejected. 2 Makris’

further contention that his securities offense was not cognizable under 18 U.S.C. § 2314 also

lacks merit. 3 We find no error in the convictions and sentences and they are AFFIRMED.

Makris’ pro se “Motion to Include Supplemental Brief or to Dismiss the Appeal

Motion” is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
             18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
             Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             ---------------------------------------------


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jack M. Laskowitz, as Chief Financial Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of Paradise, Inc.



       /s/ Jack M. Laskowitz            Date:  November 13, 2007
       -----------------------------
       Jack M. Laskowitz
       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Oliver F. MARSTON, Appellant, v. J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-1424.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 1, 1972.

Decided Dec. 6, 1972.

*695Alfred P. Ewert, New York City (Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, New York City, Herndon P. Jeffreys, Jr., J. Murray Hooker and Jeffreys & Law-ler, Richmond, Va., on brief), for appellant.

W. Brown Morton, Jr., Washington, D. C. (James N. Dresser, Morton, Bernard, Brown, Roberts & Sutherland, Washington, D. C., Edward A. Marks, Jr. and Sands, Anderson, Marks & Clarke, Richmond, Va., on brief), for ap-pellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the opinion of the District Court. Marston v. J. C. Penney Co., Inc., E.D.Va., 324 F.Supp. 889.

Affirmed.
#### WOODCOCK v. CREHAN.

No. 2847.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1946.

H. M. English, of Baton Rouge, for appellant.

J. H. Inman, of Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

DORE, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit to recover from defendant a personal judgment in the sum of two hundred thirty-seven dollars *62and twenty cents ($237.20), based on a claim for past due rent and the removal by him of certain furnishing's entrusted to his care in the use of a rented apartment. He was cited as being a resident of the City of Baton Rouge.

The defendant excepted to the jurisdiction of the court ratione personae and ra-tione materiae.

The exceptions were fixed for trial. Evidence was introduced. There was judgment overruling the exceptions. Defendant has appealed. Plaintiff has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.

It is now well settled that a judgment or order overruling exceptions is an interlocutory judgment and an appeal does not lie from such a judgment, as said judgment produces no such injury as may not be remedied on an appeal from the final judgment on the merits, and the exceptions of jurisdiction ratione personae and ratione materiae are- no exception to the rule. See Howard v. Cox, 7 Mart., N.S., 102; Richardson v. Ledbetter, 14 La. 156.

Appeal dismissed.
2013 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d
S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

1-23-2013 

# R a mir o E nr ique R oj a s v

. Att or ne y Ge ne r al U nit ed S t a t es

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 12-1227

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a
U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2013 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a
U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" R a mir o E nr ique R oj as v

. Att or ney Ge ne r al U

nit e d S t a t e s " (2013). 2013 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 1268.
h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013/1268

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12

- 1227

___________

RAMIRO ENRIQUE ROJAS, Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

Respondent



### __________

PRESENT: McKEE, Chief Judge , SLOVITER, SCIRI CA, RENDELL, AMBRO,

FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and GREENBERG 1



### , Circuit Judges

ORDER

The Court, sua sponte, orders rehearing en banc in the above captioned case.

It is ordered that the Clerk of this C ourt list the case for rehearing en banc

at the convenience of the Court.

By the Court, /s/ Theodore A. McKee Chief Circuit Judge

Date: January 23, 2013
T rg/ cc: Tracy M. Hubbard, Esq.

Craig R. Shagin, Esq. Timothy H a yes, Esq. Andrew J. Oliveira, Esq.

1 Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 738

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for partial

removal of limitations on contributions to candidates whose opponents

exceed personal contribution limitations in an election.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 30, 1995

Mr. ROHRABACHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

provide for partial removal of limitations on contributions

to candidates whose opponents exceed personal contribution limitations in an election.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 738 IH

1 SECTION 1. PARTIAL REMOVAL OF LIMITATIONS ON CON2 TRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES WHOSE OPPO3 NENTS USE LARGE AMOUNTS OF PERSONAL

4 FUNDS.

5 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(i)(1) If a candidate for Federal office makes con9 tributions or expenditures from the personal funds of the

10 candidate totaling more than $1,000 with respect to an

11 election, the candidate shall so notify the Commission and

12 each other candidate in the election. The notification shall

13 be made in writing within 48 hours after the contribution

14 or expenditure involved is made.

15 ‘‘(2) In any case described in paragraph (1), any per16 son who is otherwise permitted under this Act to make

17 contributions to such other candidate may make contribu18 tions in excess of any otherwise applicable limitation on

19 such contributions, to the extent that the total of such

20 excess contributions accepted by such other candidate does

21 not exceed the total of contributions or expenditures from

22 personal funds referred to in paragraph (1).’’.
3

•HR 738 IH

1 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT FOR INDEPENDENT

2 EXPENDITURES MADE IMMEDIATELY BE3 FORE AN ELECTION.

4 Section 304 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

5 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 434) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(d) Any person, political committee, or organization

8 which makes an independent expenditure or commitment

9 to purchase products or services to be used in the last

10 7 days before an election, shall so notify each candidate

11 in the election. The notification shall be made in writing

12 at least 48 hours before the expenditure or commitment

13 is made.’’.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TRACI COLLINS,

Appellant,

v.

LENA LAXTON,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00041

- CV

Appeal from the

53rd District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- FM

- 15

- 006800 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss

the appeal. We further order costs are assessed against the Appellant. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d).

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
              18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
              Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
              ---------------------------------------------


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Paradise, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Melvin S. Gordon, as Chief Executive Officer of Paradise, Inc., certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of Paradise, Inc.



       /s/ Melvin S. Gordon            Date:  November 15, 2004
       -----------------------------
       Melvin S. Gordon
       Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Arotech Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Paup, Vice President – Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.









By:      /s/ Thomas J.
Paup


Thomas J. Paup,


Vice President – Finance and
CFO


(Chief Financial
Officer)





Date:  April
9, 2009
#### George E. Morris v. State.

No. 24915.

January 10, 1951.

*Angus Wynne, Russell Allen,*Dallas, and *Crain, Vandenberge & Houchins,*by *J. V. Vandenberge, Jr.,*Victoria, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

*358ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORRISON, Judge.

The opinion of this court heretofore rendered in this cause is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor:

The charge is false imprisonment, under Art. 1169, P. C. The case was tried before the county court of Calhoun county without the intervention of a jury and resulted in appellant’s conviction and a fine of $75.

There being no bills of exception in the record, the only questions for review by this court are the regularity of the proceedings and the sufficiency of the evidence.

The alleged injured parties were hunting deer on Matagorda Island. After they had killed three deer, they were approached by the defendant and, by him, carried, together with the deer, to the home of Mr. Wynne, who owned or had under lease a large portion of Matagorda Island. The defendant was, throughout the entire transaction, acting as overseer for Mr. Wynne and, under his instructions, was not to allow hunting on the land on which he had cattle grazing. When the party, consisting of the defendant and the two alleged injured parties, arrived in defendant’s “jeep” at Mr. Wynne’s house on the south part of the island, Mr. Wynne came out to the jeep and told the two alleged injured parties that they “had no right to hunt out there,” took charge of the deer, and instructed the defendant to drive them back to their boat — which was done. This journey to and from the Wynne home was the detention relied upon by the state.

The record in this case, after diligent search, fails to reveal where on Matagorda Island the deer were killed, other than, inferentially, that the same occurred on land under the control of Mr. Wynne and on which he was engaged in the raising of cattle. The witnesses testified as to the sites of the killing, but failed to make any mark of identification on the map introduced in evidence, so that an exact location could be made by this court. The record being in such condition, it is impossible for this court to write on several questions raised by appellant.

The complaint and information allege that the defendant in and upon the injured parties did commit an assault and did then and there by means of threats .... unlawfully detain them.

*359A careful search of the record fails to reveal any evidence of an assault or of a threat of any character made by the defendant to either of the injured parties, both of whom testified that none was made.

Having alleged the use of threats and having failed to prove same, the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6747
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TREVOR LITTLE, a/k/a Tragedy, a/k/a Trag, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CR-95-198) Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 17, 2003 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Trevor Little, Appellant Pro Se. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Trevor Little appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his motions for correction or reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Little , No. CR-95-198 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.75
                                                               Amendment to Employment Agreement - J. Cywinski



AMENDMENT TO  
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of February 14, 2020 by and between Dine Brands Global, Inc. (f/k/a DineEquity, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), and John C. Cywinski (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated March 9, 2017 (the “Amendment”); and
WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to enter into this Amendment to amend certain of terms of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual terms and conditions hereof, the Corporation and the Executive hereby agree as follows:
1.    Section 13(f)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby replaced and restated in its entirety with the following:  “(ii) INTENTIONALLY OMITTED”.   The last sentence of Exhibit A of the Agreement is hereby deleted.
2.    This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by any electronic means, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and the same agreement.
3.     All terms and provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby, either expressly or by necessary implication, shall remain in full force and effect. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and the Executive have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written.
	
		
	EXECUTIVE
	DINE BRANDS GLOBAL, INC.

	 


	 

	By:    /s/ John C. Cywinski      
	By:      /s/Gregory R. Bever      

	John C. Cywinski
	Name:  Gregory R. Bever

	 
	Title:    Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer