alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel  “MEMORY T32”.                    

*Date:*                         September 12, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         3 pm to 5 pm.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Doubletree Hotel, 1515 Rhode Island Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review,  National Institute of Child Health and,  Human Development, NIH,  6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01,  Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 12, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-19219 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# ORIGINA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19-0407 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. MICHAEL BRANDON BREAREY,

Defendant and Appellant. 

# FILEL NOV 04 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Appellant Michael Brandon Brearey appeals the June 24,2019Dispositional Order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, that revoked his deferred imposition ofsentence in that court's Cause No.DC-16-294B. The State had petitioned to revoke Brearey's deferred sentence because it alleged he committed two violations ofthe conditions ofhis probation. On appeal,Brearey argues thatthe District Courtshould nothave revoked his deferred sentence because the State had not exhausted all remedies ofthe Montana Incentives Intervention Grid. Brearey further asserts his counsel was ineffective. The State has filed a Notice ofConcession. Although it maintains it does not agree with all the arguments advanced by Brearey, it concedes this Court should reverse the District Court's revocation ofBrearey's deferred sentence and remand this matter to the District Court for the setting ofa new revocation hearing. Having considered the Appellant's Opening Brief and the State's Notice of Concession,and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Dispositional Order of June 24, 2019, is REVERSED. The revocation ofBrearey's deferred sentence in Cause No. DC-16-294B 11/04/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0407ofthe Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County,is VACATED. This matter is

remanded with instructions for the District Court to set a new revocation hearing. Dated this y day ofNovember,2020.

2 

# :/„1"..3

1 1b Justices
EX-35 (a)
Thornburg 2006-2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1.   A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2006 through and including December 31, 2006 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all
material respects throughout such period. [If any material failure, specify such
failure and its nature and status.]

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th
day of February 2007.

By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name:  Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
       Director of Loan Administration
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 782 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 782

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend title 18 of the United States Code to allow members of 
employee associations to represent their views before the United States 
                              Government.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 782

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend title 18 of the United States Code to allow members of 
employee associations to represent their views before the United States 
                              Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Employee Representation 
Improvement Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. REPRESENTATION BY FEDERAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Extension of Exemption to Prohibition.--Subsection (d) of 
section 205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(d)(1) Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) prevents an officer or 
employee, if not inconsistent with the faithful performance of that 
officer's or employee's duties, from acting without compensation as 
agent or attorney for, or otherwise representing--
            ``(A) any person who is the subject of disciplinary, 
        loyalty, or other personnel administration proceedings in 
        connection with those proceedings; or
            ``(B) except as provided in paragraph (2), any cooperative, 
        voluntary, professional, recreational, or similar organization 
        or group not established or operated for profit, if a majority 
        of the organization's or groups's members are current officers 
        or employees of the United States or of the District of 
        Columbia, or their spouses or dependent children.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1)(B) does not apply with respect to a covered 
matter that--
            ``(A) is a claim under subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1);
            ``(B) is a judicial or administrative proceeding where the 
        organization or group is a party; or
            ``(C) involves a grant, a contract, or other agreement 
        (including a request for any such grant, contract, or 
        agreement) providing for the disbursement of Federal funds to 
        the organization or group.''.
    (b) Application to Labor-Management Relations.--Section 205 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(i) Nothing in this section prevents an employee from acting 
pursuant to chapter 71 of title 5 or section 1004 or chapter 12 of 
title 39.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 24, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
hun_Ex4_14


		
			Exhibit 4.14
		

		
			DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES
		

		
			REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
		

		
			SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		

		
			As of February 13, 2020, Huntsman Corporation (the “Company”) has its Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Huntsman International LLC has no securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
		

		
			Description of Common Stock
		

		
			The below description of the Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) and our Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws dated as of December 21, 2016 (the “Bylaws”), each of which is incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this exhibit is a part. We encourage you to read our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the applicable provisions of Delaware General Corporation Law, for additional information.
		

		
			Authorized Common Shares
		

		
			The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,200,000,000 shares of Common Stock.
		

		
			Voting Rights
		

		
			Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders. Holders of Common Stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.
		

		
			Dividends
		

		
			Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably dividends if, as and when dividends are declared from time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose, after payment of dividends required to be paid on outstanding preferred stock, if any.
		

		
			Liquidation Rights
		

		
			Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up, any business combination or a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably the assets available for distribution to the stockholders after payment of liabilities and accrued but unpaid dividends and liquidation preferences on any outstanding preferred stock.
		

		
			Other Rights
		

		
			The Common Stock has no preemptive or conversion rights and is not subject to further calls or assessment by us. There is no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common Stock. All outstanding shares of our common stock are fully paid and non-assessable.
		

		
			Listing
		

		
			The Common Stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “HUN.”
**EXHIBIT31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Haris Tajyar,certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of HARRY’S TRUKING, INC.
    - Based     on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a     material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this     report; 
    - Based     on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information     included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the     financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
    - I     am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for     the small business issuer and have: 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting.

                                                                                             /s/ Haris Tajyar

Date: August 13, 2008                                                                                                             

 Haris Tajyar, President and CFO
190 La. 836

#### HENDERSON v. HENDERSON.

No. 34590.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 27, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 1938.

Lester Wilson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

L. Percy Garrot, of Shreveport, for ap-pellee.

ROGERS, Justice.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married in Alexandria, Louisiana, on June 20, 1918. Three children were born of the marriage. All these children are girls and at the time this suit was brought were respectively sixteen, fourteen and eleven years of age. For the past ten years the parties have been living in the city of Shreveport.

On March 11, 1937, this suit was filed by the wife charging her husband with cruel treatment of such a nature as to render their living together insupportable.

The husband had no previous notice or intimation that the suit would be filed. On the day that it was filed, the husband as usual reported for work at his place of employment. After he had left the common residence, the wife removed all their furniture and automobile to another residence in Shreveport, and, after this had been done, the petition filed in this case was served on her husband. Immediately thereafter he went to the place that had been occupied as the matrimonial domicile and found an empty house.

Plaintiff in her petition alleges a number of acts of cruel treatment on the part of her husband towards her. Defendant in his answer denies the acts of cruelty imputed to him by his wife.

The judge of the district court after hearing the evidence rejected plaintiff’s demand and she has appealed from the judgment.

Plaintiff’s allegations of cruel treatment were sufficient if established, to entitle her to a separation from bed and board. Civ. Code, art. 138 et seq. But plaintiff was unable to make good her allegations by proof. Her testimony as to the various acts of cruel treatment imputed to her husband is not corroborated by any other witness. It stands alone. The letters offered in evidence by plaintiff are more favorable to defendant’s story than they are to hers. Defendant denied the acts of cruel treatment with which he was charged.

The record shows that defendant while not a man of prominence is well thought of in the community in which he lives. The testimony of members of the social set in which the parties moved establishes his character as that of a quiet and agreeable person.

*174The record also shows that defendant always has been a hard working man and that he has provided for his wife and children as his means allowed. At the time the present suit was filed he was preparing to build a home for his family on a lot of ground which he had purchased a short while before.

It appears from the evidence that plaintiff is of a nervous and excitable temperament and of a jealous disposition. This is apparently the source of her dissatisfaction with her matrimonial relation.

We find nothing from our examination of the record that would justify us in disturbing the judgment of the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demand.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Yunus KALULE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50360.

D.C. No. CR-98-00877-CBM-05.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*951Submitted March 10, 2003.*

Decided March 20, 2003.

Before CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Yunus Kalule appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2. Kalule contends that the district court erred by failing to grant his request for a downward departure based on the atypical nature of his case. We lack jurisdiction because Kalule knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal. *United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182-83 (9th Cir.2000). This appeal is

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Delano KIRBY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4798.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 13, 2003.

Decided March 26, 2003.

Edward Smith, Jr., Smith & Garrett, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Harvey E. Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin Kirby appeals his conviction and 188-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000). Because we conclude that Kirby’s waiver of his appellate rights was knowing and voluntary, we dismiss his appeal. *See United States v. Attar,*38 F.3d 727, 731 (4th Cir.1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### John Isley, Appellant, v. Maurice Gilbert and Brooklyn and Long Island Realty Company, Respondents.

Second Department,

December 30, 1908.

Practice—motion and order —motion after denial of similar motion made by codefendant.

The fact that the motion of one defendant to open his default has been denied does not prevent another justice from granting a similar motion made by a codefendant.

Criticism of court reproved.

Appeal by the plaintiff, John Isley, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 18th day of May, 1908.

The motion was made by the defendant the Brooklyn and Long Island Realty Company.

*Charles*Foley, for the appellant.

*Harry*Cook, for the respondent Gilbert.

*Alonzo G. McLaughlin [Leo C. Stern*with him on the brief], for the respondent Brooklyn and Long Island Realty Company.

Gaynor, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order opening a default to answer, and vacating the judgment, which is to foreclose a *584mechanic’s lien. The attorney for the plaintiff seeks to cast odium on the learned Judge who made the order by saying that he granted the motion notwithstanding that another Judge at Special Term had previously denied it, and capital letters are resorted to so that this may be made plain to us. The answer to this statement is that when the record is examined it is found not to be true. The defendant Gilbert’s motion was previously- denied by another Judge, but the motion now before us was made by the other defendant. The subjecting of Judges to false criticism of this kind deserves severe reproof. It is always regrettable to find statements in a brief which are not in accordance with the record and are calculated to mislead. Moreover, the order and papers on the previous motion were not produced at all on the present motion, nor was the learned Justice informed of them by affidavit. In order to give color to his unfounded criticism, however, the plaintiff’s attorney has included them in the appeal record.

The order should be affirmed.

Woodward, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 8.1
 WNS (HOLDINGS) LIMITED
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 S/No.
    
    Name of Subsidiary
    
    Place of Incorporation1.
    
    WNS Global Services Netherlands Cooperative U.A.
    
    The Netherlands2.
    
    WNS North America, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USA3.
    
    WNS Global Services (UK) Limited
    
    United Kingdom4.
    
    Town & Country Assistance Limited
    
    United Kingdom5.
    
    Business Applications Associates Limited
    
    United Kingdom6.
    
    WNS (Mauritius) Limited
    
    Mauritius7.
    
    WNS Global Services (Romania) S.R.L.
    
    Romania8.
    
    WNS Philippines Inc.
    
    Philippines9.
    
    WNS Global Services Philippines, Inc.
    
    Philippines10.
    
    WNS Mortgage Services Private Limited
    
    India11.
    
    WNS Workflow Technologies Limited
    
    United Kingdom12.
    
    Chang Limited
    
    United Kingdom13.
    
    Accidents Happen Assistance Limited
    
    United Kingdom14.
    
    Business Applications Associates, Inc
    
    Delaware, USA15.
    
    Baizan International Software Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.
    
    China16.
    
    WNS Capital Investment Limited
    
    Mauritius17.
    
    WNS Global Services (Private) Limited
    
    Srilanka18.
    
    WNS Customer Solutions (Singapore) Private Limited
    
    Singapore19.
    
    WNS Customer Solutions (Private) Limited
    
    Srilanka20.
    
    WNS Global Services Private Limited
    
    India21.
    
    WNS Customer Solutions North America, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USA22.
    
    WNS BPO Services Costa Rica, S.A.
    
    Costa Rica23.
    
    WNS Global Services (Australia) Pty Ltd
    
    Australia