U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Prosecuting Sexual Assault: A Comparison of Charging Decisions in Sexual Assault Cases Involving Strangers, Acquaintances, and Intimate Partners
NCJ Number
              190494
Journal

*Justice Quarterly* Volume: 8 Issue: 3 Dated: September 2001 Pages: 651-688
Author(s)
          Cassia Spohn;
                        David Holleran
Date Published

September 2001
Length
              38 pages
Annotation
              This study of prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases in Kansas City and Philadelphia tested the hypothesis that the effect of victim characteristics was conditioned by the relationship between the victim and the suspect.
Abstract
              The data came from 259 cases in Kansas City in which the defendant was arrested in 1996, 1997, or 1998 for rape, forcible sodomy, sexual assault, deviate sexual assault, first-degree statutory rape, or first-degree statutory sodomy of a victim age 12 or older. Data also came from 267 cases in Philadelphia that involved rape, involuntary deviant sexual intercourse, and sexual assault of victims age 12 or older that resulted in an arrest in 1997. The research examined the effect of victim, suspect, and case characteristics on charging decisions in three types of cases: those involving strangers, acquaintances or relatives, or intimate partners. Results revealed that the effect of victim characteristics, with one exception was confined to cases involving acquaintances and intimate partners. Prosecutors were less likely to file charges in these types of cases if questions existed about the victim’s character or behavior at the time of the incident. In contrast, the victim’s reputation and behavior did not affect charging in cases involving strangers. Prosecutors in those types of cases were more likely to file charges if the suspect used a gun or knife or if the victim was white. The analysis concluded that stereotypes of real rapes and genuine victims continued to influence the charging decision in at least some types of sexual assault cases. Tables, footnotes, case citation, and 65 references (Author abstract modified)
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        98-WT-VX-0003


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Study/Research)
    
  
  
Date Published: September 1, 2001
    
          Downloads
        
                      HTML

Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Prosecution
        Prosecutorial discretion
        Prosecutorial screening
        Sexual assault victims
        Victim-offender relationships



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Is It an Accident or Abuse? Researchers Develop Predictive Models for Pediatric Head Injuries
                  What Medical Examiner’s And Coroner’s Offices Should Know About Molecular Autopsy
                  Technical Note – Gas Chromatography-Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy (GC-VUV)
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov