alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Clinical, Treatment and Health Services Research Review Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         October 14-15, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                               ( print page 46633)    

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3042 Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-4032,                         *katrina@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 31, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E8-18253 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Opinion issued December 10 , 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 00642
- CR

——————————— IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. KIM OGG , Relat or

Original Proceeding Petition for Writ of Mandamus Petition for Writ of Prohibition

MEMORANDUM OPINION Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg, representing the State of Texas, filed a petition seeking mandamus and prohibition relief

. 1 On October 30, 2020, the State filed a motion to dismiss this proceeding as moot because the underlying trial

1 The underlying case is State of Texas v. Celso Elias Sapon

- Rosales , cause number 2282643 , pending in the County Criminal Court at Law No. 8 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Franklin Bynum presiding.2

court case was dismissed and refiled as a felony complaint. A certified copy of the dismissal and felony complaint were provided to this Court. No response or opposition to the motion was filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.3(a). We have not issued a decision in the case . Because the trial court cause from which this proceeding arises has been dismissed, we grant the State’s motion and dismiss th is p roceeding as moot

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Hightower, and Countiss. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 606 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  Union Calendar No. 31

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 606

                          [Report No. 104-58]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 28, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

                                                  Union Calendar No. 31
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 606

                          [Report No. 104-58]

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 1995

 Mr. Hall of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Hobson, and Mr. Regula) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

                           February 28, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 201(b) of 
the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-
419, approved October 16, 1992), is amended as follows:
            (1) In paragraph (2), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (2) In paragraph (4), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (3) In paragraph (5), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (4) In paragraph (6), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
            (5) In paragraph (7), by striking ``from recommendations'' 
        and inserting ``after consideration of recommendations''.
```
| Name of Subsidiary              | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Star Circuits, Inc.             | South Dakota                  |
| MSC Technologies, Inc.          | South Dakota                  |
| Daktronics Media Holdings, Inc. | South Dakota                  |
| Daktronics Canada, Inc.         | Canada                        |
| Daktronics, GmbH                | Germany                       |
| Daktronics UK, Ltd              | Great Britain                 |
| Daktronics Hong Kong Ltd        | Hong Kong                     |
| Daktronics Shanghai Ltd         | Peoples Republic of China     |
| Daktronics France SARL          | France                        |
| Daktronics Beijing              | Peoples Republic of China     |
| Daktronics Hoist, Inc.          | New York                      |
| Daktronics Australia PTY LTD    | Australia                     |
| Daktronics FZE                  | United Arab of Emirates       |
| Daktronics Installation         | South Dakota                  |

----
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(e)(i)



AMENDMENT
TO THE
ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC. 
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


As Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2018


The Arrow Electronics, Inc. Non-Employee Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as it was last amended and restated effective July 1, 2018 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows
1.    Effective December 31, 2019, the following sentences hereby are added to the end of Section 3.1:
“Deferrals of Compensation earned after December 31, 2019, will be limited to deferrals of Compensation into Deferred Stock Units under the Non-Employee Directors Deferred Stock Unit Plan set forth in Exhibit A.  As clarification, deferral elections may not be made for Compensation earned after December 31, 2019, except for deferrals of Compensation to Deferred Stock Units.”
#### Johnson *v.*St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Johnson *v.*Northern Insurance Company. Johnson *v.*Agricultural Insurance Company. Johnson *v.*Providence Washington Company. Johnson *v.*Citizens Insurance Company. Johnson *v.*Aachen *&*Munich Insurance Company.

November 11, 1907:

Per Curiam,

These cases all involve the same question as Johnson v. Royal Insurance Company, opinion filed herewith, ante, p. 182, and for the reason given therein the orders are affirmed.
----

----

| Nevada                                                        | 20-5506885                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

----

----

| 31.01  | 31  | Principal Executive certification           | This Filing  |
|-------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
| 31.02  | 31  | Principal Accounting Officer certification  | This Filing  |
| 32.01  | 32  | Principal Executive certification           | This Filing  |
| 32.02  | 32  | Principal Accounting Officer certification  | This Filing  |

----

----
- 257 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski 

Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff, 

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland & 

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, 

appellee and cross-appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., 

for appellant.

Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. 

Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., 

L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick.

Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law 

Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.

Heavican, C.J., Cassel, Stacy, Funke, Papik, and 

Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed 

by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

03/12/2021 09:10 AM CST
- 258 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group, 307 Neb. 

599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020).

We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule 

it, but modify the opinion as follows:

(1) In the background section, under the subheading 

“Peremptory Challenges,” we withdraw the last sentence of 

the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a 

marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental transcript, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in 

the appellate record.”

(2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “Peremptory 

Challenges (Assignment of Error No. 1),” we withdraw the 

seventh paragraph and substitute the following:

We do not decide that question here. While KPG has 

offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental 

transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the 

roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that 

it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the 

record is insufficient to support its assignment of error 

even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

Miller-Lerman, J., not participating.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6854

ROGER MARTIN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD MURRAY; 19 JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-1082-2)

Submitted: October 3, 1996 Decided: October 15, 1996

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We also deny Appellant's motions for an extension of time,

a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and

appointment of counsel.

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court assessed a

filing fee in accordance with Local Rule 28(C) for the Eastern District of Virginia, and dismissed the case without prejudice when

Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of

discretion, we affirm.* Martin v. Murray, No. CA-95-1082-2 (E.D.

Va. Apr. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1.


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Adam
Anthony, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of
Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2008 of the Registrant, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  August
11,
2008                                                                           By:  /s/ Adam
Anthony


Adam Anthony


Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting


Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Aftermarket
Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46921-46922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,659]


Unilever Illinois Manufacturing, LLC, Food Solutions Division, 
Including On-Site Leased Workers of Manpower, Account Resources and 
Intertech, Franklin Park, IL; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on July 17, 2008, applicable to workers of 
Unilever Illinois Manufacturing, LLC, Food Solutions Division, Franklin 
Park, Illinois. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
July 30, 2008 (73 FR 44284).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of commercial soup bases.
    New information shows that leased workers of Manpower, Account 
Resources and InterTech were employed on-site at the Franklin Park, 
Illinois location of Unilever Illinois Manufacturing, LLC, Food 
Solutions Division. The Department has determined that these workers 
were sufficiently under the control of Unilever Illinois Manufacturing, 
LLC, Food Solutions Division to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include leased workers of Manpower, Account Resources 
and InterTech working on-site at the Franklin Park, Illinois location 
of the subject firm.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers employed at Unilever Illinois Manufacturing, LLC, Food 
Solutions Division, Franklin Park, Illinois who were adversely affected 
by a shift in production of commercial soup bases to Canada.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,659 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Unilever Illinois Manufacturing, LLC, Food 
Solutions Division, including on-site leased workers of Manpower, 
Account Resources and

[[Page 46922]]

InterTech, Franklin Park, Illinois, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after July 9, 2007, through July 17, 
2010, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 
223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for 
alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of August 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-18587 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EX-10.65



 Exhibit 10.65 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO COAL MINING LEASE 

(FOR “RESERVE 2”) 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO COAL MINING LEASE FOR “RESERVE 2” (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 13th day of February, 2013, but effective as of December 31, 2012 (“Effective Date”) by and between COLT LLC, a West Virginia limited liability company (“COLT”), and
HILLSBORO ENERGY LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“LESSEE”). COLT and LESSEE is each sometimes referred to individually herein as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”. 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, COLT and LESSEE entered into that Coal Mining Lease for “Reserve 2” dated August 12, 2010 (“Lease”);

 WHEREAS, COLT and LESSEE desire to amend the period during which Minimum Royalty paid by LESSEE may be recovered against Actual
Production Royalty, as set forth in this Amendment, as of the Effective Date. 
 NOW THEREFORE, COLT and LESSEE agree to amend the
terms of the Lease as follows: 
 1. The final paragraph of Section 11, Minimum Royalty, shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following language: 
 Minimum Royalty paid by LESSEE during the Primary Term or any Extended Term of this Lease
shall be recoverable only against Actual Production Royalty during the period of ten (10) years following the date on which such Minimum Royalty payment was made. For emphasis, any and all Minimum Royalty paid by LESSEE to COLT during the
Primary Term or any Extended Term of this Lease and not recouped against Actual Production Royalty during the period of ten (10) years following the date on which such Minimum Royalty payment was made, for any reason whatsoever, shall be
forfeited and retained by COLT. 
 2. The recitals or “whereas” clauses at the beginning of this Amendment are incorporated herein
by reference and constitute binding terms hereof. Capitalized terms in this Amendment shall have the same meaning given to them in the Lease. 

3. All other terms and conditions contained in the Lease shall remain unchanged. 







 4. This Amendment may be executed in counterpart. 

WHEREFORE, the Parties have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this Amendment as of the Effective Date set forth
above. 
  

			
	COLT LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Donald R. Holcomb

		
	Name:	 	 Donald R. Holcomb

		
	Title:	 	 Authorized Person

	
	HILLSBORO ENERGY LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael J. Beyer

		
	Name:	 	 Michael J. Beyer

		
	Title:	 	 CEO



  
 2
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL**


**OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**


**TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Valda
      Downing, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Suncross Exploration Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
      10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of Suncross Exploration Corporation.





Dated:
      August 14, 2007





By:           */s/
      Valda Downing*


Valda
      Downing


Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


and
      Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




Board of Directors
SigmaTron International, Inc.

We have issued our report dated July 8, 2005, accompanying the consolidated
balance sheet of SigmaTron International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of April 30,
2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the year then ended, included in the Annual Report of
SigmaTron International, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
April 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of SigmaTron International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-20147 and 333-52044).


                                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Chicago, Illinois
July 21, 2005
Exhibit 23.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114987, Registration Statement No. 333-55836 and Registration
Statement No. 333-62585 of The Pantry, Inc. on Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-116972 of The Pantry, Inc. on Form S-3, as amended, of our report dated December 10, 2004, except as to the effects of Note 2 and Note 20 as to which the
date is August 30, 2005 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs related to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143,Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations and the restatement described in Note 2), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment No. 1) of The Pantry, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2004.



| |  |                          
| |  | -------------------------
| |  | /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
| | 
| |  | Raleigh, North Carolina  
| |  | August 30, 2005