alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fourteen Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206/EUROCAE WG 76 
Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information 
Services Data Link.

DATES: The meeting will be held September 8-12 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at Rocky Mountain Park Holiday Inn, 
101 South Saint Vrain, P.O. Box 1468, Estes Park, Colorado 80517.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; 
fax (202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org; (2) Hosted by LFV 
Group-Swedish Airports and Air Navigation Services; Onsite Contact: Ana 
Paula Frangolho, telephone 2-729-4702; fax 2-9008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 206 meeting/EUROCE WG 76. The 
agenda will include:
<bullet> September 8
<bullet> Opening Plenary (Chairman's Remarks and Introductions, Review 
and Approve, Discussion, Meeting Agenda and Minutes, Action Item 
Review, Coordination with WG78/SC2 14, Schedule for this week, Schedule 
for next meetings)
<bullet> Presentation
    <bullet> Resolution of USED FRAC Comments--Ernie Dash
    <bullet> Others to be determined
    <bullet> SPR and INTEROP
<bullet> September 9-11
<bullet> AIS Subgroup Meeting
<bullet> Meteorology Subgroup Meeting
<bullet> September 12
<bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings
<bullet> Plenary Session
<bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Date and Place of Next 
Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn)
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' section. Members of the public 
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 6, 2008.
Francisco C. Estrada,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-18644 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### L. C. (Tom) Moore v. State

No. 25478.

January 30, 1952.

*616Hon. Edgar Taylor, Judge Presiding.

*Fred C. Chandler,*Colorado City, by *E. S. Pharr,*Lubbock, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant, for the first time, by his motion for rehearing, insists that no final judgment has been entered in this case and that, for this reason, the appeal should be dismissed.

The transcript contains what, upon its face, purports to be a judgment of the court showing that appellant was duly tried and convicted by a jury, upon which verdict the trial court entered the judgment. As it appears in the transcript, the judgment does not show to have been entered in the minutes of the court.

Accompanying the motion for rehearing is the certificate of the county clerk certifying that the judgment had not been entered in the minutes of the court but, by inadvertence, had been omitted from such record.

It is apparent, therefore, that a judgment has not been entered of record in the minutes of the court in this case. “Entered of record,” as applied to a judgment in a criminal case, means “entered in the minutes of the court.” The case of Ellis v. State, 140 Tex. Cr. R. 339, 145 S. W. 2d 176, appears to be here controlling; it was there held that a docket entry in a misdemeanor case did not constitute a judgment entered of record.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted; the opinion heretofore rendered in this case is withdrawn; and the appeal is now dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
cbl-ex1024_8.htm



Exhibit 10.2.4


	

	
 




 

AMENDMENT #3

TO

CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES, INC.

2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

 

 

Pursuant to the determination of the Board of Directors of the Company and by action of the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Shareholders Meeting of May 7, 2012, the CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted.  By Resolution dated January 7, 2014, the Plan was amended by that certain Amendment #1 to the Plan, and, by Resolution dated May 9, 2017, the Plan was amended by that certain Amendment #2 to the Plan.  

 

 

The Plan is hereby further amended by this Amendment #3 to the Plan by deleting Section 3(a) of the Plan and inserting the following in its place as new Section 3(a) of the Plan:

 

 

(a)   Number of Shares of Common Stock Available. Subject to Section 3(b) and 3(c), the total number of shares of Common Stock available for distribution pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be 10,400,000 shares of Common Stock; provided that the maximum number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted during the term of Plan shall not exceed 10,400,000.

 

 

Shares subject to an Award under the Plan may be authorized and unissued shares or may be treasury shares.

 

 

If any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award are forfeited, if an Award otherwise terminates or expires without all of the shares of Common Stock covered by the Award being issued or if an Award is settled for cash (in whole or in part) or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Award (including shares not issued to satisfy withholding taxes or to satisfy the exercise price of an Award), such shares of Common Stock shall, to the extent of such forfeiture, termination, expiration, cash settlement or non-issuance, again be available for the grant of Awards under this Plan. In the event that any Option or other Award is exercised through the tendering of shares of Common Stock (either actually or by attestation), or withholding tax liabilities arising from such Option or other Award are satisfied by the tendering of shares of Common Stock (either actually or by attestation), then the shares so tendered shall be available for the grant of Awards under this Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no shares of Common Stock may again be awarded if such action would cause an Incentive Stock Option to fail to meet the requirements for such Option under Section 422 of the Code. 






 

Dated to be effective as of February 10, 2020.

 

CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.

 

By:/s/ Stephen D. Lebovitz 

 

Stephen D. Lebovitz 

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Paradigm Medical  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
John Y. Yoon,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (a)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material respect, the financial condition and result of operations
              of the Company.




                                          /s/ John Y. Yoon
                                         ------------------------------------
Date: April 27, 2005                     John Y. Yoon
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           9,085
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,122
<PP&E>                                         207,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,907
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,931
<BONDS>                                        171,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,995
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,002)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,852
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,584
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    599
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                  SUBSIDIARIES OF NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                            <C>
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals GmbH                                   (Germany)
NeXstar Farmaceutica, S.A.                                     (Spain)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Italia, Srl                            (Italy)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Limited                                (United Kingdom)
NeXstar Farmaceutica Portugal, LDA                             (Portugal)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals B.V.                                   (The Netherlands)
NeXstar Pharmaceutique Sarl                                    (France)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals PTY Limited                            (Australia)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Limited                                (Ireland)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals International Limited                  (United Kingdom)
</TABLE>
18411.

#### FLINN *v.*FLYNN.

Submitted November 10, 1953

Decided January 11, 1954.

*281
      *Congdon, Harper & Leonard,*for plaintiff in error.

*Maurice Steinberg,*contra.

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. It is a well-settled rule that all persons who are directly or consequentially interested in the result of litigation should be made parties, either plaintiff or defendant, to proceedings for equitable relief. Code § 37-1004; *Wyche*v. *Green,*32 *Ga.*341; *Blaisdell*v. *Bohr,*68 *Ga.*56; *Henderson*v. *Napier,*107 *Ga.*342 (33 S. E. 433); *Bond*v. *Hunt,*135 *Ga.*733 (1) (70 S. E. 572); *First National Bank of Sparta*v. *Wiley,*150 *Ga.*759 (2) (105 S. E. 308). A petition for equitable relief which fails to name essential and indispensable parties, namely, those who will be adversely or prejudicially affected by the judgment prayed for, is defective *282and subject to demurrer. *Parnell*v. *Wooten,*202 *Ga.*443 (43 S. E. 2d 673), and citations.

2. In the present case the plaintiff seeks to vacate and set aside a year’s support judgment, but Harriette Faye Flynn, a minor, is not a party to the proceeding. By the judgment sought to be vacated and set aside, she acquired an interest in the property set apart as a year’s support *(Walden*v. *Walden,*191 *Ga.*182, 12 S. E. 2d 345; *Mixon*v. *Sumner,*205 *Ga.*579, 54 S. E. 2d 411; *Ennis*v. *Ennis,*207 Ga. 665, 63 S. E. 2d 887); and this is true even if the marriage between her mother and her father was in fact a bigamous one, it not appearing that such marriage had ever been declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction. Code § 53-104; *Griffin*v. *Booth,*176 *Ga.*1 (167 S. E. 294); *Campbell*v. *Allen,*208 *Ga.*274 (66 S. E. 2d 226). Having acquired vested property rights in consequence of the year’s support judgment, she was an essential and indispensable party to an equitable proceeding to vacate and set it aside. “In a proceeding in equity, all persons having a legal or equitable interest in the subject matter of the suit must be made parties.” *Wyche*v. *Green,*supra. Full and final relief could not be administered by the court unless she was a party, and it was therefore necessary that she be a party to the action. For this controlling reason the judgment complained of is not erroneous. See *Brown*v. *Brown,*97 *Ga.*531 (25 S. E. 353); *Miller*v. *Butler,*137 *Ga.*90, 93 (72 S. E. 913); *Isom*v. *Nutting,*153 *Ga.*682 (113 S. E. 197).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Duck-worth, C. J., not participating.*
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Cobitz, VandenBerg & Fennessy


<PAGE>

                  [Letterhead of Cobitz, VandenBerg & Fennessy]



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

         We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  and use of our
report,  dated January 19, 2000 on the consolidated  financial statements of AMB
Financial  Corp.  which  appears  in AMB  Financial  Corp.'s  Annual  Report  of
Shareholders and Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999.




/s/ Cobitz, VandenBerg & Fennessy
---------------------------------
Cobitz, VandenBerg & Fennessy




March 23, 2000
Palos Hills, Illinois
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000076063
<NAME> PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     54,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,000
<PP&E>                                       1,508,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,413,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,000
<BONDS>                                      1,094,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,129,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,413,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               235,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                116,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             48,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    48,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is a wholly-owned
subsidiary.
</FN>


</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00176 - CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF CHRISTINA LYNN FLETC HER AND ROBERT HUGH FLETCHER

On Appeal from the 237th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014 - 510,128, Honorable Leslie Hatch, Presiding



### July 13 , 2015 ORDER Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. On July 9, 2015, appellant, Robert Hugh Fletcher, filed with this Court an Emergency Motion to Suspend Enforcement of the Decree of Divorce Pending Appeal. By this motion, Robert “seeks a stay of all enforcement actions transferring any real property in this case until this Court has decided his appeal.” According to R ule 24.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, when the judgment is for the recovery of an interest in real or personal property, the trial court will determine the type and amount of security. T EX . R. A PP . P. 24.2(a)(2). As such, we now abate this appeal2

and remand the cause 1 to the trial court for further proceedings as necessary to set the appropriate type and amount of security required under Rule 24.2(a)(2). Upon remand, the trial court shall enter an order setting the type and amount of security that Robert must post to suspend enforcement of the trial court’s divorce decree while the appeal remains pending before this Court. See id . The trial court shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record to be developed containing its order setting bond, deposit, or security , as well as any other orders issue d relating to this matter . The trial court shall then ensure that this supplemental clerk’s record be filed with the C lerk of t his Court on or before August 1 2 , 201 5 . If it is necessary to hold a hearing to determine this issue, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of the hearing to be given and shall conduct the hearing as soon as practicable. If a hearing is held, the trial court shall caus e the hearing to be transcribed and cause a reporter’s record to be developed containing the transcri ption of any evidence and arguments presented at the hearing. The trial court shall then file any supplemen tal reporter’s record with the C lerk of this C ourt on or before August 1 2 , 201 5 . It is so ordered. Per Curiam

1 W hile w e are aware that the trial court has continuing jurisdiction to order the amount and type of security even after its plenary power has expired, see T EX . R. A PP . P . 24.3(a), we abate and remand this cause in case the trial court needs to take evidence regar ding the “value of the property interest’s rent or revenue . . . . ” T EX . R. A PP . P. 24.2(a)(2)(A).
Exhibit 32.2




                 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Dennis L. Bergquist, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
of Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify, to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"), that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.

Date:  August 13, 2003

                                                 /s/ Dennis L. Bergquist
                                                 -----------------------------
                                                 Dennis L. Bergquist


NOTE:  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Molecular
Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by law,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered July 3, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00702
- CV
PHILIPS JACOB VALLAK ALIL AND REEJA SUSAN PHI LIPS, Appellant s V. JEREMY ERIC LARSEN A ND TEXA S REAL ESTATE COMMIS SION, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 10734



### O RDER Appellee Jeremy Eric Larsen has filed a Suggestion of Bankruptcy stating that he has filed for bankruptcy i n the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. This automatically suspends further action in this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal. It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party complying with Rule 8.3 and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this
Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.3.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 3.1**

 

**ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE COMPANIES INC.**

 

**AMENDED BY-LAW**

 

**ARTICLE IV. OFFICERS**

 

Section 1. Number and Qualifications. The officers of the corporation shall include the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Presidentand the Secretary. Any two or more offices, other than President and Secretary, may be held by the same person. The Chairman of the Board, President and Secretary shall be elected from time to time by the Board of Directors, each to hold officeuntil the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of the shareholders, or until his or her successor shall have been duly elected, and shall have qualified, or until his or her death, or until he or she shall haveresigned, or have been removed, as hereinafter provided in these Bylaws. The Board of Directors shall also elect the Chief Executive Officer of the corporation, which shall be either the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the President. Theofficers of the corporation also may include such other officers as may be determined by the Chief Executive Officer to be necessary or desirable for the business of the corporation. Such other officers shall have such duties as may be prescribed bythe Chief Executive Officer and shall hold their offices until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of the shareholders, or until his successor shall have been duly appointed, and shall have qualified, or until hisdeath, resignation, or removal as hereinafter provided in these Bylaws. 

 

Adopted June 12, 2003 

 

33