alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12.1

                             SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.
               CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             2000          1999           1998           1997          1996
                                                          ------------  ------------   ------------  -------------  ------------
<S>                                                          <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Income before minority interest of
    unitholders in Operating Partnership and
    extraordinary items                                      $ 86,814      $ 59,760       $ 66,475       $ 31,934      $ 21,187
Interest:
    Expense incurred                                           38,649        37,282         32,550         20,902        16,113
    Amortization of deferred financing costs                    1,072           992            956          1,057         1,025
    Rental fixed charges                                          280           159            133            115           124
                                                          ------------  ------------   ------------  -------------  ------------
    Total                                                    $126,815      $ 98,193       $100,114       $ 54,008      $ 38,449
                                                          ============  ============   ============  =============  ============

Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                         $ 38,649      $ 37,282        $32,550        $20,902       $16,113
    Interest capitalized                                       11,117         7,888          6,143          5,876         4,266
    Dividends to preferred unitholders in operating
      partnership                                              12,420         6,698             --             --            --
    Rental fixed charges                                          280           159            133            115           124
    Amortization of deferred financing costs                    1,072           992            956          1,057         1,025
                                                          ------------  ------------   ------------  -------------  ------------
      Total                                                  $ 63,538      $ 53,019       $ 39,782       $ 27,950      $ 21,528
                                                          ============  ============   ============  =============  ============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                               1.99          1.85           2.52           1.93          1.79
                                                          ============  ============   ============  =============  ============
</TABLE>
#### Ruth Goldberg, Respondent, v Allen Skolnick, Appellant.

[678 NYS2d 13]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered January 12, 1998, which, insofar as appealable, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the *724amended complaint for failure to comply with a prior order, same court (Carol Arber, J.), directing service of an amended complaint setting forth certain details of plaintiffs fraud claims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The amended complaint, served and filed in accordance with the prior order, sets forth the circumstances constituting the alleged fraudulent misconduct with sufficient particularity to meet the requirements of CPLR 3016 (b) *(see, Lanzi v Brooks,*43 NY2d 778), especially when considered along with plaintiffs affidavits and other evidentiary submissions *(see, Big Apple Car v City of New York,*204 AD2d 109). That portion of the order denying defendant’s motion for leave to reargue the prior motion is nonappealable *(see, Berman v Szpilzinger,*180 AD2d 612). Contrary to the motion court’s decision, a motion to reargue need not be brought on by order to show cause. In any event, the prior order properly granted leave to amend the pleading, which should be freely given *(see, Joel v Weber,*166 AD2d 130, 138). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
NO. ______________

ASEL ABDYGAPPAROVA § IN THE COURT OF § VS. § CRIMINAL APPEALS § STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes ASEL ABDYGAPPAROVA, Appellant in the above styled and

numbered cause, and moves for an extension of time of 20 days to file a petition

for discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following:

1. On JUNE 4, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's

conviction. ASEL ABDYGAPPAROVA v. State, 04-14-00393-CR. This petition

is therefore due on July 26, 2015.

2. Counsel has been unable to complete the petition for the following

reasons: Counsel has had trouble contacting the appellant. Also, this counsel has

been involved in an accelerated CPS appeal. Further, counsel has been preparing

for two trials.

3. Defendant

is currently incarcerated.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , appellant respectfully

requests an extension of 20 days, i.e. until July 26, 2015, to file a petition for PD-0916-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/20/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 7/22/2015 4:03:11 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKdiscretionary review.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN SHEFFIELD PC PO Box 276343 San Antonio, Texas 78227 Tel: (210) 697-9090 Fax: (210) 591-7311

By: /s/Shawn Sheffield Shawn Sheffield State Bar No. 24008020 Attorney for DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on July 19, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above

and foregoing document was served on the District Attorney's Office, Bexar

County, Texas.

/s/Shawn Sheffield Shawn Sheffield
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Levcor
International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert A. Levinson President and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




By:/s/ Robert A. Levinson
   ----------------------
Name: Robert A. Levinson
      ------------------
President and Principal Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
#### James A. Tedford, Appellant, *v.*Solomon Lichtenstein, Respondent.

First Department,

December 11, 1908.

Appeal from order—sufficiency of record.

The record on an appeal from an order should consist of the papers recited in the order appealed from as the papers úpon which the same was granted.

The sufficiency of a record filed on an appeal to the Appellate Division must be determined by that court and not by the Special Term.

If the papers served are those not required by the General Rules of Practice the respondent may move in the Appellate Division to dismiss the appeal.

Appeal by the plaintiff, James A. Tedford, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county.of New York on the 24th day of July, 1908, canceling a certificate of the clerk attached to papers on appeal from an order opening the default of the defendant herein.

*Edwin J.*Johnson, for the appellant.

*Edwin D.*Hays, for the respondent.

*36Per Curiam:

It is clear that the record upon which an appeal is to be heard consists of the papers recited in the order appealed from as the papers upon which the same was granted. The question as to whether or not the record tiled in this court is the proper record is one which must be determined by this court and not by the Special Term. If the papers served are not those required by the General Rules of Practice, the respondent can move in this court to dismiss the appeal.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.
221 So.2d 121

#### George Martin CAGLE v. STATE.

6 Div. 695.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 3, 1969.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Lloyd G. Hart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for peti.tioner.

McEniry, McEniry & McEniry, Bessemer, opposed.

Certiorari to Court of Appeals. .

COLEMAN, Justice.

Petition of the State, by its Attorney General, for certiorari to the Court of-Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision in Cagle v. State, 45 Ala.App. 3, 221 So.2d 119.

Writ denied.

SIMPSON, HARWOOD and BLOOD-WORTH, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1730

___________

Associated Contract Loggers, Inc.; *

Olson Logging, Inc., *

*

Appellants, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota

United States Forest Service; Superior *

Wilderness Action Network; Forest *

Guardians, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

*

__________________ *

*

Koochiching County; The Northern *

Counties Land Use Coordinating *

Board, *

*

Amici Curiae. *

___________

Submitted: March 16, 2001

Filed: June 5, 2001

___________

Before MURPHY, LAY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

2The Forest Service's motion to strike portions of Amici's brief is denied.

-2-

Plaintiffs, Associated Contract Loggers, Inc. and Olson Logging Inc., filed suit

in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota1 against the United

States Forest Service and two not-for-profit groups, Forest Guardians and Superior

Wilderness Action Network. Plaintiffs allege a violation of the Establishment Clause.

The district court dismissed the suit on defendants’ motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12(b)(6). The plaintiffs now appeal. Amici curiae Koochiching County and The

Northern Counties Land Use Coordinating Board have submitted a joint brief in

support of plaintiffs' position.2

Finding that no error of law appears in the district court's opinion, and that

further opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm without discussion. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

 A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENNETH N. JONES JR.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 268 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,568,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,181,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,859,855
<PP&E>                                      35,499,590
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,127,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,309,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,491,752
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,255
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,745,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,309,640
<SALES>                                      3,045,447
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,630,601
<CGS>                                          436,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,666,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,036,144)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,036,144)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,036,144)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)


</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-13792

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00014-MW-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

KEITH JELKS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(May 1, 2019)

Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 18-13792 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Megan Saillant, appointed counsel for Keith Jelks in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Jelks’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-13792 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

                                                          
                                                          
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                             
                             
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-78412 and 333-4540) pertaining to the McWhorter 
Technologies, Inc. 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, McWhorter Technologies, Inc. 
Employee 401(k) Savings Plan, McWhorter Technologies, Inc. 1996 Incentive 
Stock Plan and McWhorter Technologies, Inc. 1996 Nonemployee Director Stock 
Option and Award Plan of our report dated November 18, 1996, with respect to 
the financial statements of McWhorter Technologies, Inc. included in the 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1996.



                                                         
                                       
                                     _______________________________________
                                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 27, 1997
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Jeremy Goodwin, Chief Financial Officer of CHINA ADVANCED
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:





1. 
    The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. 
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th
day of November, 2010.





/s/ Jeremy GoodwinJeremy
      GoodwinChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and will be retained by China
Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 05-0926

((((((((((((((((

Victoria Palms Resort, Inc.,

v.

CITY OF DONNA, TEXAS

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Review

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1.Pursuant to the notice of *City of Donna, Texas*, filed with this Court on November 9, 2005, this case is **ABATED**.

2.The case is abated until further order of this Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion.

Done at the City of Austin, this 21st day of April, 2006.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Allegheny National Forest, USDA Forest Service. 

# ACTION:

Notice of New Fee Site. 

# SUMMARY:

The Allegheny National Forest is planning to charge from $100-$150 per night fee for rental of the Farnsworth Cabin. This cabin has not been available to the public for recreation use prior to Spring 2009. This historic cabin was built by the Civilian Conservation Corp in the 1940's. Rentals of other cabins on the Allegheny National Forest have shown that the public appreciates and enjoys the availability of historic rental cabins. 

# DATES:

Farnsworth Cabin will become available for recreation rental Spring, 2009. 

# ADDRESSES:

Forest Supervisor, Allegheny National Forest, P.O. Box 847, Warren PA 16365. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tonika Goins, Recreation Team Leader for Bradford District, 29 Forest Service Drive, Bradford, PA 16701, phone (814) 363-6049, or mail                         *tonikagoins@fs.fed.us*.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish a six month advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. The new fee will be reviewed by a Recreation Resource Advisory Committee prior to a final decision and implementation. A market analysis indicates that the $100 to $150/per night fee is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. People wanting to rent Farnsworth Cabin will need to do so through the National Recreation Reservation Service, at                     *http://www.reserveusa.com*                     or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 fee for reservation.                 

Dated: August 6, 2008. 

Leanne Marten, 

Forest Supervisor (Allegheny National Forest).

[FR Doc. E8-18562 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

UNION SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Peninger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008



/s/ Michael J. PeningerMichael J. PeningerChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47592-47593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Notice of Intent To Grant an Exclusive Patent License

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of 
Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended, 
the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant 
Parhelion Labs, Incorporated in the State of California, having a place 
of business at 1660 S. Amphlett Blvd., Suite 350, San Mateo, California 
94402, an exclusive license in any right, title and interest the Air 
Force has in:

U.S. Patent No. 6,497,718, issued December 24, 2002, entitled ``Process 
for phase-locking human ovulation/menstrual cycles'' by Edmond M. 
Dewan.

DATES: A license for this patent will be granted unless a written 
objection is received within fifteen (15) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written objection should be sent to: 
James M. Skorich, Esq., 2251 Maxwell Ave., SE., 377th ABW/JAN Kirtland

[[Page 47593]]

AFB NM 87117-5773. Telephone: (505) 846-1542.

Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-18815 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P