alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Signature                         | Title                | Date          |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------|---------------|
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ Byron J. Anderson     | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | Byron J. Anderson    |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ Robert G. Dutcher     | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | Robert G. Dutcher    |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ Nancy D. Frame        | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | Nancy D. Frame       |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ Aelred J. Kurtenbach  | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | Aelred J. Kurtenbach |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ Frank J. Kurtenbach   | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | Frank J. Kurtenbach  |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ James B. Morgan       | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | James B. Morgan      |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ John L. Mulligan      | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | John L. Mulligan     |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ Bruce W. Tobin        | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | Bruce W. Tobin       |          |   |
|                              |                 |          |   |
| By /s/ James A. Vellenga     | Director             | June 16, 2011 |
|                              | James A. Vellenga    |          |   |
#### William Ebling and Others, Respondents, v. Francis J. Nekarda, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 93 0

. CATHERI NE GI BSON M C C A U L E Y v

. KTM R OOFI NG CO.,

I NC.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a b reach o f co nt ract act io n i n m ag i st rat e co u rt

. Aft e r t h e

m ag i s t rat e co u rt i ss u ed ju dg m en t i n fav o r o f t h e d efen d an t KTM Ro o fi n g Co

., In c.,

t h e p l ai nt i ff Cat h eri n e Gi b s on M cCau l ey ap p eal ed to t h e su p eri o r co urt

. Th e s u p eri o r

co u rt al s o en t ered ju d g m en t i n fav o r o f t h e d efen d an t

, an d McCau l ey fi l ed t h i s d i rect

ap p eal . Th e d efen d an t h as fi l ed a m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s t h e ap p eal

.

“ [A] p p eal s fro m d eci s i o n s o f th e s up eri o r co urt s rev iewi n g d eci s i o n s o f l o wer

co u rt s b y cert i o rari o r d e n o v o p ro ceed in g s sh al l b e by ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal .” Bu l l o ck v. Sa n d

, 2 6 0 Ga. Ap p

. 87 4

, 8 7 5 ( 5 8 1 S E 2 d 3 3 3 ) (2 0 0 3); s ee al s o

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ). Becau s e M cCau l ey di d n ot fo l l o w t h e p ro per p ro ced u re fo r

r e q u es t i n g ap p el lat e rev i ew i n t h i s cas e, we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal

.

Acco rd in g ly

, t h e d efen dan t ’ s m o ti o n to di sm i s s is GRANTED, an d th e ap p eal i s

DISM ISSED. Fu rt h er, t he d efen d an t ’ s m o t i o n fo r san ct i o n s i s DENIED b ecau s e t h e

m o ti o n was n o t fi l ed as a s ep arat e d o cu m en t as req u i red b y Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 4 1

(b ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 25, 2018

01/25/2018
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Thomas
F. Karam, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:  August 9,
2005
 
 /s/
THOMAS F. KARAM
 Thomas F.
Karam
 Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
33-91368 of RTW, Inc. on Form S-8/S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-91372 of 
RTW, Inc. on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 33-98966 of RTW, Inc. 
on Form S-8 of our report dated February 5, 1997, incorporated by reference 
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of RTW, Inc. for the year ended December 
31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 1997
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Yifan Communications, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samuel
      Yen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
                Samuel
                Yen
              Samuel
                Yen
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              March
                14, 2006
Exhibit 32


Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coyote Resources, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Guy Martin, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coyote Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Coyote Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Guy MartinGuy MartinPrincipal Executive Officer, Principal Financial OfficerAugust 13, 2012
#### In the Matter of the Application of Fred JACKSKION for the Suppression of Evidence and Information Obtained upon Search and Seizure of Premises Situate at Hollowville, Columbia County, New York, Known as Brosh Farm, the Residence and Home of Fred Jackskion. Fred Jackskion, Petitioner-Appellant; United States of America, Appellee.

No. 186.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1938.

*1006Louis Halle, of New York City, for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty, of New York City (Walter N. Thayer, 3d, Asst. U. S. Atty, of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6840

LARRY GARY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

B. E. DAVID; R. L. HOPPER; R. H. SIZEMORE; B.

S. DOBBS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-00-572-1)

Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 27, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Gary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Fred Thurman Hamlet, Sr.,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Gary, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. In

the briefing order, Gary was warned that this court would not

consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See

Local R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Gary’s informal brief does not

challenge the district court’s finding that he had filed his

complaint outside the three-year limitations period, but instead

addresses the merits of his claims. Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NUMBER 13

- 10

- 00 502

- CR



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

FIDEL PULIDO

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 148 t h District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Fidel Pulido , by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss

his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2(a).

Wit hout passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed2

the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

m andate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the

23rd day of September, 2010

.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Shirley Jean JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 69411.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 28, 1997.

*300Daniel P. Reardon, Jr., St. Louis, for defendant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa A. Fischer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment on her conviction by a jury of second-degree murder, § 565.020, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which she was sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Company

LiveWire Mobile, Inc.One Monarch Drive
Suite 203
Littleton, MA 01460

NMS Communications Europe Ltd.200 Brook Drive
Green Park
Reading, Berkshire RG2 6UBUK

NMS Communications Europe S.A.S.Immeuble Pericles
144, Avenue Roger Salengro
92370 Chaville, France

NMS Communications International, Inc.100 Crossing Boulevard
Framingham, MA 01702

NMS Communications Securities Corporation100 Crossing Boulevard
Framingham, MA 01702

Openera Technologies, Inc.100 Crossing Boulevard
Framingham, MA 01702

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11

                        CAPITOL COMMUNITIES CORPORATION
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Twelve Months Ended
                                            September 30,

                                            1998         1997
                                            ----         ----
<S>                                    <C>           <C>
Shares Outstanding Beginning             7,312,000    7,000,000
 Of Period

Shares Issued During Period
   October 7, 1996                                       38,000
   November 12, 1996                                    150,000
   April 17, 9997                                       (38,000)
   April 25, 1997                                       (19,000)
   May 7, 1997                                          (19,000)
   October 7, 1997                          38,000
   October 20, 1997                         20,000
   October 28, 1997                        (19,000)
   December 31, 1997                        33,500
   April 2, 1998                            35,000
   April 17, 1998                         (700,000)
   April 30, 1998                          200,000
   September 30, 1998                        5,000
                                       -----------   ----------

Total Outstanding                        6,924,500    7,112,000

Weighted average number of               7,249,494    7,171,014
 shares outstanding

Shares deemed outstanding from
assumed exercise of stock options                -            -
                                       -----------   ----------
Total                                    7,249,494    7,171,014
                                       ===========   ==========

Earnings (loss) applicable to
 common shares                         $(3,829,723)  $ (143,768)
                                       ===========   ==========

Earnings (loss) per share of
 common stock                          $    (0.528)  $   (0.020)
                                       ===========   ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,013
<SECURITIES>                                    46,531
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,074
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (543)
<INVENTORY>                                    120,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,776
<PP&E>                                         106,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                (71,141)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,073
<BONDS>                                          3,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,196
<OTHER-SE>                                     197,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,843
<SALES>                                         72,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,031
<CGS>                                           53,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
SCWC-14-0001115

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

PL III, LLC, a Hawai#i limited liability company;

ARICK B. YANAGIHARA; MICHAEL H. NEKOBA; WILLIAM G. BOYLE;

and ANITA MATSUZAKI, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Counterclaim

Defendants-Appellants,

vs.

PUU LANI RANCH CORP., a Hawai#i corporation,

Respondent/Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee,

and

F. NEWELL BOHNETT, as Trustee under that certain unrecorded

Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated July 29, 1981, made

by F. Newell Bohnett, as Settlor; and F. NEWELL BOHNETT,

in his individual capacity, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------------------------------------------

PL III, LLC, a Hawai#i limited liability company;

ARICK B. YANAGIHARA; MICHAEL H. NEKOBA;

WILLIAM G. BOYLE; and ANITA MATSUZAKI,

Petitioners/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees,

vs.

PUU LANI RANCH CORP., a Hawai#i corporation,

Respondent/Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant,

and

F. NEWELL BOHNETT, as Trustee under that certain unrecorded

Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated July 29, 1981, made

by F. Newell Bohnett, as Settlor; and F. NEWELL BOHNETT,

in his individual capacity, Respondents/Defendants-Appellants.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0001115, CAAP-15-0000484, and CAAP-15-0000671;

CIVIL NO. 11-1-433K)

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0001115

22-NOV-2021

01:47 PM

Dkt. 32 ODMR
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., and

Circuit Judge Somerville, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused.)

Upon consideration of petitioners/plaintiffscounterclaim defendants-appellants’ motion for reconsideration,

filed on November 17, 2021, and the record, 

It is ordered that the motion for reconsideration is

denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 22, 2021.

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Rowena A. Somerville

2
#### Terrell Ellis Sisk v. State.

No. 25349.

June 13, 1951.

Rehearing Denied October 10, 1951.

Hon. M. O. Goodpasture, Judge Presiding.

*W. M. Tucker,*Wellington, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appeal is from a conviction for driving on a public highway in Hall County while intoxicated. The penalty assessed was a fine of $175.00 and 30 days in jail.

The state has filed a motion to strike the bills of exception and statement of facts because the same were not filed within the time provided by law. The record sustains this contention and the motion is accordingly granted.

The record is therefore before us without bills of exception or statement of facts, in which condition it presents nothing for our consideration.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

WOODLEY, Judge.

In this misdemeanor case, the statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed within the 30 days allowed by Art. *360760(5), Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., (since repealed), the procedural statute applicable at the time notice of appeal was given and when the case was submitted in this court.

Also, it is observed that the statement of facts filed was not approved by the trial judge as then required by Art. 760, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. See Moore v. State, 154 Tex. Cr. R. 307, 227 S.W. (2) 219.

The judgment was therefore properly affirmed. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Opinion approved by the Court.