alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 09-13750

JOHN H. BARTON,

Plaintiff,

-vUNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER RESCINDING ORDER OF

REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order of Reference to Magistrate

Judge Majzoub dated September 22, 2010, is RESCINDED.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: December 6, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 6, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0620

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEVEN JAMES CLIFTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 25, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 18 2022

04/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0620
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            RTW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
  STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    1997         1998         1999
                                                -----------   ----------   -----------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>
Basic weighted average shares outstanding         11,832,720   11,926,819   12,290,990

Stock options
   Options at $25.00                                       -            -            -
   Options at $19.33                                       -            -            -
   Options at $16.67                                       -            -            -
   Options at $12.50                                       -            -            -
   Options at $10.75                                     919            -            -
   Options at $ 8.67                                   4,955            -            -
   Options at $ 7.13                                      95            -            -
   Options at $ 6.75                                     357            -            -
   Options at $ 5.81                                       -            -        4,361
   Options at $ 5.44                                       -            -            -
   Options at $ 5.00                                       -            -       13,615
   Options at $ 4.75                                       -            -        1,834
   Options at $ 4.50                                       -            -       13,990
   Options at $ 4.38                                       -            -       24,778
   Options at $ 2.67                                  54,065            -        5,594
   Options at $ 2.00                                 186,018            -        4,797
   Options at $ 0.53                                       -            -            -
                                                 -----------   ----------   ----------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON
   SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING                  12,079,129   11,926,819   12,359,959
                                                 ===========   ==========   ==========


NET INCOME (LOSS) ($000's)                            $5,799      ($7,081)      $6,167
                                                 ===========   ==========   ==========

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
   BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE                       $0.49       ($0.59)       $0.50
                                                 ===========   ==========   ==========
   DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE                     $0.48       ($0.59)       $0.50
                                                 ===========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6307]

The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a meeting by conference call on Thursday, August 28, 2008, beginning at 11 a.m. Eastern Time. The open portion of the call should last approximately fifteen minutes and will address the UNESCO Associated Schools Project Network. Additional topic areas that relate to UNESCO may be discussed as needed. The Commission will accept brief oral comments from members of the public during the open portion of this conference call. The public comment period will be limited to approximately ten minutes in total with three minutes allowed per speaker. Members of the public who wish to present oral comments or listen to the conference call must make arrangements with the Executive Secretariat of the National Commission by August 26, 2008. The second portion of the teleconference meeting will be closed to the public to allow the Commission to discuss applications for the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Laura W. Bush Traveling Fellowship, a fellowship funded through privately donated funds. This call will be closed pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it is likely to involve discussion of information of a personal nature regarding the relative merits of individual applicants where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

                    For more information contact Alex Zemek, Executive Director of the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. Telephone: (202) 663-0026; Fax: (202) 663-0035; E-mail:                     *DCUNESCO@state.gov.*

Dated: August 7, 2008.

Alex Zemek,

Executive Director,U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E8-18843 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 49

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit contributions by multicandidate political committees and to limit contributions

in House of Representatives elections from persons other than individual

in-State residents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ARCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit contributions by multicandidate political committees and to limit contributions in House of Representatives elections from persons other than individual inState residents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY

4 MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL COMMITTEES.

5 Section 315(a)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign

6 Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a(a)(2)) is amended to read

7 as follows:
2

HR 49 IH

1 ‘‘(2) No multicandidate political committee may make

2 contributions with respect to any election for Federal

3 office.’’.

4 SEC. 2. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION LIMITA5 TION ON CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PERSONS

6 OTHER THAN INDIVIDUAL IN-STATE RESI7 DENTS.

8 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

9 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

10 the following new subsection:

11 ‘‘(i)(1) A candidate for the office of Representative

12 in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress

13 may not, with respect to an election for Federal office,

14 accept contributions from persons other than individual

15 in-State residents totaling more than 20 percent of the

16 total of contributions accepted from all sources.

17 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term ‘individual

18 in-State resident’ means an individual who resides in the

19 State in which the congressional district involved is

20 located.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WABCO Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacques Esculier, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

Dated: November 6, 2008
December 4, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

COREY DESHUN FARROW , Appellant
NO. 14

- 11

- 00449

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for o bservance.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                     EXHIBIT 11.0


                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                                      Year Ended June 30,
                                                                    ----------------------
                                                                    1997              1996
                                                                    ----              ----
                                                             (In thousands, except per share amount)

<S>                                                               <C>               <C>     
Net Income.................................................       $ 10,936          $ 11,723
                                                                    ======            ======

Weighted average common shares outstanding.................          8,299             8,594

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive
    effect of stock option.................................            516               323
                                                                   -------             -----

Total weighted average common shares and
    equivalents outstanding................................          8,815             8,917
                                                                     =====             =====

Earnings per common and common share equivalents...........         $ 1.24            $ 1.31
                                                                     =====             =====

Total weighted average common shares and
    equivalents outstanding................................          8,815             8,917

Additional  dilutive  shares using  ending  period  
     market value versus  average market value for 
     the period when utilizing the treasury stock
     method regarding stock options.........................           229                29
                                                                    ------            ------

Total shares for fully dilutive earnings per share.........          9.044             8,946
                                                                     =====             =====

Fully diluted earnings per common and
    common share equivalents...............................         $ 1.21            $ 1.31
                                                                     =====             =====
</TABLE>
                                             45
SCWC-14-0000596

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-14-0000596; FC-S NO. 11-0042)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Mother-Appellant’s Application for Writ of

Certiorari, filed on May 18, 2015, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 29, 2015.

Rebecca A. Copeland

for petitioner/motherappellant

Diana M. Mellon-Lacey,

Mary Anne Magnier, and

Jay Goss for respondent

Department of Human 

Services

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000596

29-JUN-2015

12:39 PM
#### H. W. White v. State

*No.*25410.

October 24, 1951.

Hon. Ben F. Thorpe, Judge Presiding.

*H. A. Leaverton,*Seminole, for appellant.

*409
      *George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for theft of casing pipe, with punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment alleged ownership of the pipe jointly in L. H. Armer and Vernon Bottom, Armer being the actual owner and Bottom, the special owner. Want of consent to the taking was alleged in both.

Upon the trial of the case, Bottom testified. We have examined the statement of facts with care, and agree with the appellant that nowhere therein did he testify that the pipe was taken without his consent.

Armer was shown to reside in Fort Worth, Texas. He did not testify. The record does not reflect that he was not available to the state as a witness.

It is the rule of long standing that where the owner of alleged stolen property is present and testifies in the case, he must testify to the want of consent to the taking of the property, and circumstantial evidence cannot supply such proof. Holmes v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 26, 120 S. W. 2d 595, and authorities there cited.

In view of the fact that a reversal of the conviction is required by reason of the above rule, we pretermit a discussion of the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show appellant’s guilty connection with the alleged theft, further than to say that we express doubt relative thereto. We suggest that if another trial be had the state’s case be strengthened in that particular.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### William J. Rafferty, Respondent, v. The Security Trust and Life Insurance Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard J. DeGarmo


Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director


Dated: December 30, 2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0066 CITY OF KALISPELL,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SARAH TARESU OLDS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 1 3, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 7 2023

04/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0066
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARRYL McGORE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 09-13573

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

OFFICER LUTZ and 

OFFICER GREBOWSKI,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND CLOSING CASE

Plaintiff Darryl McGore is a state prisoner at Oaks Correctional Facility in Manistee,

Michigan. He has filed a pro se complaint and an application to proceed without prepayment of

the fees and costs for this action. Defendants are Correctional Officers Lutz and Grebowski of

the St. Louis Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan. The complaint alleges that, on April

8, 2008, defendant Lutz pulled Plaintiff aside and told him to tuck in his shirt. On a subsequent

occasion, defendant Lutz allegedly threatened Plaintiff with a stapler while Lutz was reviewing a

grievance that Plaintiff had written about Lutz. Plaintiff seeks money damages and an order

removing defendant Lutz from his block assignment. 

A preliminary issue is whether Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of the filing fee

for this action. More than three of his previous complaints have been dismissed as frivolous. 

See McGore v Mich. Sup. Ct. Judges, No. 1:94-cv-517 (W.D. Mich. Jan. 25, 1995); McGore v.

Nardi, et al., No. 2:93-cv-137 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 2, 1993); McGore v. Stine, et al., No. 2:93-cv112 (W.D. Mich. July 26, 1993); and McGore v. Stine, et al., No. 2:93-cv-77 (W.D. Mich. Apr.

2:09-cv-13573-VAR-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 10/07/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 8
2

30, 1993). Consequently, under the “three strikes” provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act

of 1995, Plaintiff may not proceed without prepayment of the filing fee and costs for this action

unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see also

McGore v. Rich, et al., No. 1:09-cv-395 (W.D. Mich. May 12, 2009) (unpublished decision

denying Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis under § 1915(g)). The fact that the four

cases listed above were dismissed before the Prison Litigation Reform Act was enacted does not

preclude the Court from counting the cases as “strikes” under § 1915(g). Wilson v. Yaklich, 148

F.3d 596, 604 (6th Cir. 1998). 

Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that he is in “imminent danger of serious physical

injury,” as he is no longer confined in the same facility where the defendants work. And because

he did not prepay the filing fee for this action, his complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

S/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: October 7, 2009

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of record

and Darryl McGore by electronic means or U.S.

Mail on October 7, 2009.

s/Carol A. Pinegar 

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-13573-VAR-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 10/07/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 9
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF INTEGRA, INC.

Advanced Behavioral Management, Inc.
Apogee of Maryland, Inc.
Apogee of Tennessee, Inc.
Apogee Health Services, Inc.
Apogee Services, Inc.
Associated Mental Health Services, Ltd.
Associates in Psychiatry, Inc.
DOC Systems, Inc.
Elliptic Resources, Inc.
Family Social and Psychotherapy Services, Inc.
Integra IPA, Inc.
Integra of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Martin E. Keller, Ed.D., Ltd.
Naperville Psychiatric, Inc.
Nevada Psychological Associates, Inc.
North, Clawson, Bolt Ltd.
Orbital Investments, Inc.
Perigee Properties, Inc.
Psychiatric Associates, Inc.
Psychogeriatrics Consultants, Inc.
The Clifton Group, Inc.
Thunderbird Behavioral Health Institute, Inc.
Twin Ponds III, Inc.
Twin Ponds Management, Inc.
Winston Clinics, Inc.
Woodmont Psychiatric Associates, Inc.
Exhibit 31.3

Certification by Chief Executive Officer

pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as

adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Dennis G. Hatchell, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Pantry, Inc.; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: January 24, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Dennis G. Hatchell               
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Dennis G. Hatchell                   
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE
ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Louis J. Belardi, certify that:

1.       I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Steel Connect, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2018;
and

2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.

Dated: December 17, 2018

|By: | /s/ Louis J. Belardi                        
|--- | --------------------------------------------
|    | Louis J. Belardi                            
|    | Chief Financial Officer                     
|    | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
----

----

|   | (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      14, 2008 | /s/                          |
|------------------------|------------------------------|
|                   | Richard      Ivanovick       |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----