alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [License No. 06/76-0330] 

Notice is hereby given that SunTx Fulcrum Fund II—SBIC, L.P., Two Lincoln Centre, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1000, Dallas, Texas 75240, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought SBA's prior written approval under section 312 of the Act and section 107.730(d), Financings with Associates, of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) rules and regulations (13 CFR 107.730 (2002)). SunTx Fulcrum Fund II—SBIC, L.P. proposes to invest in NationsBuilders Insurance Services, Inc. (“NBIS”). The financing will provide the funding for the information system improvement and growth of the business. 

The financing is brought within the purview of Section 107.730(d) of the Regulations because SunTx Fulcrum Fund, L.P. and SunTx Fulcrum Dutch Investors, L.P., Associates of SunTx Fulcrum Fund II—SBIC, L.P., own more than 5% of outstanding ownership of NBIS. Therefore, this transaction is considered as a financing with Associates requiring SBA's prior approval. 

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction, within 15 days of the date of this publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

Dated: July 9, 2008. 

A. Joseph Shepard, 

Associate Administrator For Investment.

[FR Doc. E8-18522 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDING 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,318
<SECURITIES>                                    26,992
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                       642
<INVENTORY>                                      8,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,077
<PP&E>                                          14,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,064
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,142
<SALES>                                         75,363
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,363
<CGS>                                           25,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (34)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,758
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Manuel J. Becerra, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 29, 2008
Exhibit 21.10SUBSIDIARIES OF CROWN NORTHCORP, INC.Crown Mortgage Management, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is wholly owned subsidiary of CrownNorthCorp, Inc.Crown Properties, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown MortgageManagement, Inc.CRSBP Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown MortgageManagement, Inc.CNC Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown NorthCorp, Inc.
 

 
Eastern Realty, L.L.C., a Virginia limited company, with 99% of the membership interests owned byCNC Holding Corp., and 1% owned by Crown Mortgage Management, Inc.Eastern Realty Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of CNC HoldingCorp.Eastern Baltimore, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of CNC Holding Corp.CNC Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, is 50% owned by CNC Holding Corp.Crown NorthCorp Limited, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a wholly owned subsidiary ofCrown NorthCorp, Inc.Crown Asset Management Limited, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a wholly ownedsubsidiary of Crown NorthCorp LimitedRooftop Mortgages Ltd., organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a 20%-owned subsidiary ofCrown Asset Management LimitedCrown Mortgage Management Limited, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a whollyowned by two Crown subsidiaries: Crown Asset Management Limited and Crown NorthCorp LimitedCrown Intressenter AB, organized under the laws of Sweden, is owned 74.3% by Crown NorthCorp,Inc.Crown Asset Management AB, organized under the laws of Sweden, is wholly owned by Crown NorthCorpLimitedCrown Property Management AB, organized under the laws of Sweden, is wholly owned by CrownAsset Management ABTBE, organized under the laws of Belgium, is 50% owned by Crown Mortgage Management LimitedCrown Mortgage Management GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany, is wholly owned by CrownMortgage Management LimitedCrown Westfalen Credit Services GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany, is 50% owned by CrownMortgage Management GmbH.Regal Mortgages, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is wholly owned by Crown MortgageManagement Limited
#### George K. Cummings, Respondent, v. The Corbin Motor Vehicle Corporation, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendant to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs. No opinion. (Ingraham, J,, dissented.)
#### Charles Wickham *et al.*vs. *Jolly Batchellor,*1743

And Benja Faneuil of Boston in New England Esq who as he is Admr of the Goods Debts Rights and Credits of Peter Faneuil late of sd Boston Esq deced and also Executr the last will and Testament of Cap* John Cutler deced hath a Right to three quarters of two thirds of the Snow afores4 and John Jones of Boston afores4 March* who owns the other quarter of the sa two-thirds of s4 Snow come and defend and say the Libel afores4 ought to be quash’d for that the whole of the Vessel afores4 ought to have been libeld the third part of the aforenam’d George Burchil being equally liable to pay Wages (if any are due) as the two thirds parts of the Respondents and of this etc.

Thomas Ward

And the afores4 Benjamin Faneuil and John Jones to Issue plead and say that George Burchill now residing at the Banana Islands on the Coast of Guinea in Africa Merchant On the 18*11 Day of August Instant preferred a Libel to this Court for A Reward of his saving the Vessel and Cargo afores4 and for his Great Pains Expenses and Labour in sending her into this port On Consideration whereof the honbIe John Gidley Esq then Judge of this Court adjudged and decree to the s4 Burchill one third part of the aforesd Snow and Apputenances and the one third part of the twenty Negroes mentioned in the Libel (free of all Charges or Deductions) for Salvage Whereupon the Respondents say that the sa George Burchill who employed the *235Proponents is by the Decree afores3 fully satisfied for the Salvage and bringing the sa Vessel into this Port they owe the Proponents nothing in manner and form and of this etc.

Plea to Issue No 2

Tho. Ward

I overule Second Plea, for that by a Late Statute made every Officer who is apointed hath a right to Act he being indemnified for the Space of Six Months, (?) in not taking the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy

I have duly considered the Libel of the Cap* and the Mariners against the Snow Jolly Batchelor (Cap* Cutler late Commander) and upon the whole I do Order and Decree them their Several Wages as sett forth in the Portage Bill to be paid them by William King Deputy Marshall (who by a Decree from the Honble Judge Gidley is to sell the said Snow and Cargo and receive the Money) Out of the two thirds of the Neat produce of Messrs Faneuil and Jones’s Part, and, I further Decree the Costs of this Court to be paid equally by both Partys.

Leonard Lockman

Newport August the 26. 1743.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               THE PANTRY, INC.

                                Subsidiaries


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Name of Subsidiary               State of Incorporation
         ------------------               ----------------------
         <S>                              <C>
         Lil' Champ Food Stores, Inc.     Florida
        *Sandhills, Inc.                  Delaware
        *PH Holding Corporation           North Carolina
        *Global Communications, Inc.      South Carolina
         R & H Maxxon, Inc.               South Carolina
         Kangaroo, Inc.                   Georgia
</TABLE>

                          LIL' CHAMP FOOD STORES, INC.

                                 Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Name of Subsidiary               State of Incorporation
         ------------------               ----------------------
         <S>                              <C>
         Miller Enterprises, Inc.         Florida
</TABLE>

                           *PH HOLDING CORPORATION

                                 Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Name of Subsidiary               State of Incorporation
         ------------------               ----------------------
         <S>                              <C>
        *TC Capital Management, Inc.      Delaware
        *Pantry Properties, Inc.          South Carolina
</TABLE>

                           MILLER ENTERPRISES, INC.

                                 Subsidiaries
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Name of Subsidiary               State of Incorporation
         ------------------               ----------------------
         <S>                              <C>
         Peninsular Petroleum Company     Florida
</TABLE>

     *  These subsidiaries of The Pantry were eliminated by being liquidated or
        being merged into The Pantry, effective as of September 28, 2000.
Exhibit 32.6



Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Pantry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending September 25, 2003, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 9, 2003, as amended by Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2004, Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29,
2004, and Amendment No. 3 on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (collectively, the Report), I, Daniel J. Kelly, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Daniel J. KellyDaniel J. Kelly Chief Financial OfficerDate: September 13, 2004




This Certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of
this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Statement      Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**STATEMENT      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002,**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)]                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |                                     |                                                  |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                                     |
|                       |                                |                                             |
| March                  31, 2006 | By:                            | /s/ Clement                  B. Knapp, Jr.  |
| Date                            | Clement B. Knapp,                    Jr. |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sing Yuen Chen, Also Known as Ah Moon, Appellant.

[680 NYS2d 98]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered January 10, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, hindering prosecution in the first degree, tampering with physical evidence (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The photograph of the victim taken while he was still alive and smiling was admissible for the purpose of identification since over 90 percent of the victim’s body, excluding the right side of the face, had been charred *(see, People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, *cert denied*416 US 905). After determining that the photograph corroborated the identification testimony of the victim’s uncle, that it was not offered solely to arouse the passions of the jury, and that there was no potential prejudice to the defendant, the trial court properly received the photograph into evidence *(see, People v Wood,*79 NY2d 958; *People v Stevens,*76 NY2d 833; *People v Webster,*248 AD2d 738).

The defendant’s contention that the trial court impermissibly admitted testimony of an uncharged crime is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19). In any event, the defendant failed to demonstrate that he was prejudiced by the witness’s brief statement, which was vague and ambiguous at best, that the defendant possessed drugs.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erroneously admitted testimony of a prior consistent statement is without *899merit. The defense counsel’s questioning of a witness during cross-examination inferred that the testimony was a recent fabrication, thus opening the door for the prosecutor, on redirect, to rebut this charge *(see, People v Seit,*86 NY2d 92, 95-96; *People v McDaniel,*81 NY2d 10, 16; *People v McClean,*69 NY2d 426).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Pena,*50 NY2d 400, *cert denied*449 US 1087; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
#### Agapito Guerra v. State

No. 25483.

October 31, 1951.

*415Hon. M. V. Ward, Judge Presiding.

*Galvan and Galvan,*El Paso, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Upon a trial by jury, appellant was convicted of an aggravated assault alleged to have been committed upon Carolina Guerra and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and 90 days in jail.

The state’s evidence as to the assault consists of the testimony of an El Paso police officer who was cruising in a patrol car around midnight. He testified that he heard a woman screaming and drove toward her; that he found a lady lying on the sidewalk and a man standing over or near her; that as he approached, the man walked away; that the lady told the witness that the man had hit her, knocked her down and kicked her; that she was complaining of injuries to her foot; that the man who walked away was apprehended and taken to jail; that neither he nor his fellow officer saw appellant strike the lady; that the lady told them that appellant was the man that hit her and that he was her husband, and she said something about having a family quarrel.

The alleged injured party did not testify. A deputy sheriff testified' that he had been unable to locate Carolina Guerra, having been informed at the address given on the subpoena that she was appellant’s wife and was in Mexico.

The evidence is deemed insufficient to sustain the conviction.

The report made to the officers is not deemed sufficient to show that the lady found on the sidewalk was Carolina Guerra, the person named in the complaint and information, nor to show that an assault was committed upon her.

*416The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.