alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   
  **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vitaly Melnikov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: */s/ Vitaly Melnikov*Vitaly MelnikovChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerJuly 15, 2010

                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| April                  30, 2007 | /s/                  James                  Roszel                     |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | James                  Roszel                                                                                                                                              |
|                            | President                                                                                                                                                                  |

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4221

To amend the tort claims procedures in title 28, United States Code, to

allow a member of a uniformed service to bring an action for personal

injury against a health care professional in a uniformed service, with

the exception of injuries received during a declared state of war.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Mr. STOCKMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the tort claims procedures in title 28, United

States Code, to allow a member of a uniformed service

to bring an action for personal injury against a health

care professional in a uniformed service, with the exception of injuries received during a declared state of war.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stephen E. LeNoir

5 Malpractice Accountability Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 4221 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICAL MALPRACTICE AND THE UNIFORMED

2 SERVICES.

3 Section 2674 of title 28, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘The United

5 States shall be liable in an action brought by a member

6 of a uniformed service for personal injury caused by the

7 provision of health care by a health care professional in

8 a uniformed service except in cases where such injuries

9 were sustained during a declared state of war.’’.

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 The amendment made by this Act shall apply with

12 respect to injuries sustained subsequent to January 1,

13 1990.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Natural Resources Conservation Service


Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company, LLC; Gulf South Pipeline Company 
LP; Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), Docket Nos. CP07-398-
000, CP07-398-001, CP07-399-000, CP07-400-000, CP07-401-000, CP07-402-
000, CP07-403-000, FERC EIS 0218F; March 21, 2008

AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the record of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969; the Council on Environmental Quality Guidelines (40 
CFR part 1500); and the Natural Resources Conservation Service 
Guidelines (7 CFR part 650); the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, has decided to subordinate its 
rights, acquired under the Wetland Reserve Program (WRP), to allow the 
Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company, LLC to cross NRCS held conservations 
easements associated with the Gulf Crossing Project in Madison Parish, 
LA and Fannin, Texas.
    On June 19, 2007, Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC (Gulf 
Crossing) and Gulf South Pipeline Company LP (Gulf South) jointly filed 
an application under section 7C of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for 
authorization to construct and operate facilities to be known as the 
Gulf Crossing Project which constitutes four compressor stations and an 
interstate natural gas pipeline.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has prepared a 
final environmental impact statement (EIS) to fulfill requirements of 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The purpose of this 
document was to make public the analysis of the environmental impacts 
that would likely result from the construction and operation of the 
proposed project. The NRCS participated as a cooperating agency in the 
preparation of the EIS.
    The project will affect approximately three (3) NRCS held Wetlands 
Reserve Program (WRP) easements by creating a 50 ft. permanent right of 
way (within a 100 ft. construction right of way) that extends for 
approximately 356.3 miles of which 4.6 miles is over lands encumbered 
under WRP easements located in Madison, Louisiana and Fannin, Texas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin D. Norton, State 
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 3737 
Government Street, Alexandria, Louisiana 71302; telephone (318) 473-
7751.
    A limited number of copies of the Record of Decisions (ROD) are 
available to fill single copy requests at the above address. Basic data 
evaluated for the ROD are on file and may be reviewed by contacting 
Kevin D. Norton.

    Dated: August 6, 2008.
Kevin D. Norton,
State Conservationist.
[FR Doc. E8-18803 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Concord Communications Securities Corporation
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Massachusetts

Concord Communications International, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware

CCA Holding, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware

FirstSense Software, Inc.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware

Concord Communications FSC, Ltd.
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
Organized under the laws of: Bermuda

NetViz LLC
600 Nickerson Road
Marlborough, MA 01752
State of incorporation: Delaware
#### Max Spenadel, Respondent, v. Jacob Neadle and Others, Appellants, Impleaded with Maria L. Fahys and Max E. G. Bensamon.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to defendants to withdraw demurrer and to answer on payment of costs. No opinion.
#### ALEXANDER v. HOME INS. CO. OF NEW YORK.

No. 4332.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1932.

For former opinion see 142 So. 708.

Thatcher, Browne, Porteous & Myers, of Shreveport, and Clifford E. Hays, of Minflen, for appellant.

John T. Campbell, of Minden, for appellee.

McGREGOR, J.

The original opinion in this case was handed down by us on June 29,1932, and published in 142 So. 708. In that opinion we awarded judgment for $450 as the value of the car alleged to have been totally destroyed by fire, and for $150 attorney’s fee. On the application of the defendant and appellant a rehearing was granted.

When we were considering this case on the former hearing, we were impressed with the plaintiff’s contention that his car was a total loss, and on that basis we awarded him what we considered was the value of his truck before the fire. The judge of the lower court handed down a written opinion in which he found and held that the truck was “entirely valueless” and “a total loss” after the fire. We have reread the record carefully and do not find any testimony that satisfactorily substantiates this contention. Throughout his examination of the plaintiff, counsel referred to the truck as having been “destroyed by fire,” and the plaintiff apparently answered the questions propounded to him with that assumption in mind. But nowhere in his testimony or in that of any of his witnesses do we find a positive affirmative statement that the truck was a complete and total loss.

 In his brief, both, on the former hearing and on the rehearing, counsel for the plaintiff devoted his efforts to establishing the actual value of the truck before the fire, and he satisfactorily fixed this at between $450 and $500. But nowhere does he show by whose testimony it was established that the loss by fire was total. On the contrary, defendant and appellant produced one expert automobile and truck mechanic who testified that he examined the truck after the fire and that his company would undertake to repair it and guarantee that it would be at least as good, if not better than it was before the fire, for the sum of $320. This testimony was unopposed and uneontradicted at the trial, and that being the case, we are bound to be guided by it and the judgment should have been for that amount in the first instance. The attorney’s fee accordingly should be reduced to $100, as $150 would be an excessive fee for the recovery of only $320, even though the work involved is probably worth more. *202But in cases of this kind the courts try to follow certain approximate standards based on relative proportions.

Eor the reasons assigned, our former judgment herein is amended by reducing the amount allowed for the damage done to the truck from $450 to $320, and by reducing the attorney’s fee from $150 to $100. Since the judgment of the lower court is being reduced on appeal, the costs of this court will have to be borne by the plaintiff and appellee.

In all other respects our former judgment is reinstated, and as amended herein is made the final judgment of this court, and it is so ordered.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skyview Development Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  May 13, 2008                       By:    /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
        --------------                            ----------------------
                                                  Donald R. McKelvey, President
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:  May 13, 2008                       By:    /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
        --------------                            ----------------------
                                                  Donald R. McKelvey
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

t0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145157

WILLIAM E. SARGENT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 145157

COA: 303853

WCAC: 09

- 000222

HOWMET CORPORATION and BANKERS

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 24, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hirsch International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Beverly Eichel, Executive Vice President – Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Beverly Eichel                                                                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Beverly Eichel, Executive Vice President of Finance,Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

March 31, 2009

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 033-95702, 033-97542,
333-02892, 333-20245, 333-24493, 333-30328, 333-123434 and 333-151393 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
No. 333-140362 on Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-3 and on Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 on
Form S-8 to Form S-4 of our reports dated March 16, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement schedule
of Protection One, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in the method of amortization and useful life for the
Multifamily customer account asset) and the effectiveness of Protection One, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Protection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas
City, Missouri
March 16, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 Exhibit (15)(a)








To CMS Energy Corporation:

We are aware that CMS Energy Corporation has incorporated by reference in its
Registration Statements No. 33-47629, No. 33-60007, No. 33-61595, No. 333-60795,
No. 33-62573, No. 333-32229, No. 333-63229, No. 333-68937 and No. 333-76347 its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999, which includes our report
dated November 10, 1999 covering the unaudited interim financial information
contained therein. Pursuant to Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, that
report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or
certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the
meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.






Detroit, Michigan,
     November 10, 1999.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45770-45771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18049]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 20, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Charles I. Moyer Revocable Trust, Charlotte L. Moyer Family 
Trust, and Charlotte L. Moyer Marital Trust, Charles I. Moyer, trustee, 
all of Phillipsburg, Kansas; C. Bryant Moyer, Topeka, Kansas; Clinton 
I. Moyer, Borger, Texas, all as members of the Moyer Family Group; and 
Jaret Moyer,

[[Page 45771]]

Emporia, Kansas, individually and as a member of the Moyer Family 
Group; to acquire control of Woodbine Agency, Inc., and thereby 
indirectly acquire control of The Citizens State Bank and Trust 
Company, both in Woodbine, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 31, 2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-18049 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46920-46921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-61,716]


Clayton Marcus Co., Inc., Plant <greek-i>9, a Subsidiary of La-Z-
Boy Inc., Currently a Division of Rowe Fine Furniture, Inc. (``Rowe''), 
Hickory, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on June 25, 2007, applicable to workers of 
Clayton Marcus Company, Inc., Plant <greek-i>9, a subsidiary of La-Z-
Boy Inc., Hickory, North Carolina. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on July 19, 2007 (72 FR 39643).
    At the request of a company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in employment related to the production of cut and sewn materials used 
for upholstered furniture.
    New information provided by the company shows that in October 2007,

[[Page 46921]]

Rowe Fine Furniture, Inc. (``Rowe'') purchased Clayton Marcus Co., 
Inc., Plant <greek-i>9, a subsidiary of La-Z-Boy Inc. and that some of 
the workers' wages at the subject firm are being reported under the 
Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax account for Rowe Fine Furniture, Inc. 
(``Rowe'').
    Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
include workers of the subject firm whose UI wages are reported by the 
successor firm, Rowe Fine Furniture, Inc. (``Rowe'').
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-61,716 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Clayton Marcus Co., Inc., Plant <greek-i>9, a 
subsidiary of La-Z-Boy Inc., currently a division of Rowe Fine 
Furniture, Inc. (``Rowe''), Hickory, North Carolina, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
26, 2007, through June 25, 2009, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of August 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-18582 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P