alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review R25.
    Date: September 25, 2008.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6702 Democracy Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Inst of Dental & Craniofacial 
Research, NIH 6701 Democracy Blvd, room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, MD 
20892-4878, 301-594-4809, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#402d2132391f2b252c2c39002e29286e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee838f9c97b1858b828297ae808786c0898198">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 8, 2008.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-18876 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date:   December              10, 2007 |                                                  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |                                                  |   |
|   | By:                                                   | /s/ John              E.              Lucas      |   |
|   |                                                  | John              E.              Lucas               |   |
|   |                                                  | Chief              Executive              Officer and |   |
|   |                                                  | Principal              Accounting Officer        |   |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Xianfu Han, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA ADVANCED
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:





1. 
    The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. 
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 15th
day of November, 2010.





/s/ Xianfu HanXianfu
      HanChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and will be retained by China
Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
#### Willard W. Ferguson, Jr., an Infant, by Frank Maytham, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Village of Waverly, Appellant.

Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11310] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 4. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1772-DR), dated 06/25/2008. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         06/06/2008 through 06/12/2008.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         08/05/2008.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/25/2008.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort, Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of MINNESOTA, dated 06/25/2008, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster. 

*Primary Counties:*                    Cook.                 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herber L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E8-18558 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

B ENGE CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION , Appellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2600 LT Case No. 2021

- CA

- 000875

- O

EASTWOOD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Dec ision filed October 18, 2022 Appeal from t he Circuit Court for O ra nge County , Denise Beamer , Judge.

Rebecca E. Rhoden and Hal Kantor , of Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A. , O rlando, f

or Appellant.

Mark D. Tinker and Mary Lou Cuellar

Stilo , of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P .A. , Tam pa and Scott A. Cole, of Cole , Scott, & Kissane, P.A. , Miami, for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

S ASSO , NARDELLA and WOZNIAK , JJ., concu r.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47611-47612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18821]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-110]


Meeting of the Central California Resource Advisory Council Off-
Highway Vehicle Subcommittee

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central 
California Resource Advisory Council Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) 
Subcommittee will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Saturday, September 13, 2008, at the 
Keck Community Center, 555 Monroe St., Coalinga, California, from 10 
a.m. to noon. Members of the public are welcome to attend the meeting. 
The subcommittee will conduct organizational business and discuss OHV 
issues for the subcommittee to address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM Folsom Field Office Manager Bill 
Haigh or BLM Central California Public Affairs Officer David Christy, 
both at (916) 985-4474.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The twelve-member Central California RAC 
advises the Secretary of the Interior,

[[Page 47612]]

through the BLM, on a variety of public land issues associated with 
public land management in the Central California. The RAC approved 
formation of an OHV Subcommittee in April 2007. The meeting is open to 
the public. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance 
such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations 
should contact the BLM as indicated above.

    Dated: August 7, 2008.
David Christy,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-18821 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
#### Michael Allen SMITH, Petitioner—Appellant, v. G.J. GIURBINO, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 02-56505. D.C. No. CV-01-00958-DDP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 28, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Michael Allen Smith, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his “three strikes” sentence of 25 years to life for drug possession as cruel and unusual punishment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We affirm.

Smith contends his sentence under California’s “three strikes” law violates the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that the California state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established law in upholding Smith’s sentence. *See Ewing v. California*, — U.S. ——, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 1190, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (acknowledging broad discretion possessed by legislatures and holding that three-strikes sentence of 25 years to life for felony grand theft was not grossly disproportionate); *Lockyer v. Andrade,*— U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 1175, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003) (holding that state court’s affirmance of two consecutive 25-years-tolife sentences for petty theft was not contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law). The district court therefore properly denied Smith’s petition. *See Andrade,*123 S.Ct. at 1174.1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Smith’s motion for a broader certificate of appealability is denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ruben Vasquez, Appellant.

[680 NYS2d 475]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered February 16, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6V2 to 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court did not deprive defendant of a fair trial when it denied his application to redact a codefendant’s statement to the undercover officer insofar as it allegedly contained evidence of prior crimes. The codefendant’s brief statement, which did not directly implicate defendant and was explanatory of the interaction between the undercover officer and defendants, was not prejudicial to defendant’s mistaken identity defense.

The court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to give an expanded identification charge. The identification issue was thoroughly addressed in summation and the court properly instructed the jury on the People’s obligation to prove identity beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, People v Knight,*87 NY2d 873).

The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the undercover officer who purchased the controlled substance to testify anonymously. At the *Hinton*hearing, the undercover buyer demonstrated a justifiable fear for his safety and defendant did not sustain his burden of demonstrating the materiality of the officer’s identity. We reject, as speculative, defendant’s argument that the fact that, unlike the buyer, the “ghost” in the operation gave his name when testifying led the jury to conclude that the buyer had been threatened *(see, People v Kearse,*215 AD2d 104, *lv denied*86 NY2d 797).

We have examined defendant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
#### ALLEN v. MICHAUD et al.

No. 4452.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Dec. 1, 1933.

For former opinion, see 148 So. 495.

Elder & Elder, of Ruston, for appellants.

Redmond & Thompson, of Monroe, for ap-pellee.

DREW, Judge.

In a former hearing of this case, this court increased the award of the lower court in favor of plaintiff from the sum of $250 to $1,000. On application for rehearing, it was brought to the attention, of the court that, although appellee argued and proved the quantum of damages, no: answer to the appeal praying for the increase had been filed. A rehearing was granted as to the quantum of damages alone.

The case has been resubmitted, and, due to the fact that no answer to the appeal ap*132pears in the record, our former decree, in sp far as it increases the amount of damages- awarded to plaintiff, will have to be recalled ; and there is now judgment affirming the judgment of the lower court, with costs, for reasons assigned in the former opinion of this court styled Miss Lorena Norris v. S. E. Michaud et al., 148 So. 493.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6578
In Re: ALFRED F. WORLEY, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-13-1-MU) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 11, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alfred F. Worley, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alfred F. Worley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging undue delay by the district court in ruling on his pending 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000) petition and asking that this court rule on the petition. A writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be granted only in those extraordinary situations when no other remedy is available. See In re: Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). We recently vacated the district court’s original decision denying Worley’s § 2254 petition and remanded for further proceedings. Worley v. O’Dell , No. 00-6381 (4th Cir. Mar. 15, 2001) (unpublished). The district court must be afforded a reasonable amount of time to comply with our remand instructions.We find that there has been no undue delay, and Worley is not entitled to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, although we grant Worley’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument wold not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Endeavor
Explorations Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: December 17, 2007

/s/ Belkis Jimenez
RiveroBelkis
Jimenez Rivero, President and C.E.O. (Principal Executive Officer)

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DARIUS DESHAUN POOLE, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-1153

LT Case No. 2016-CF-28593

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed September 27, 2022

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, 

Lisa Davidson, Judge.

Matthew R. McLain, of McLain Law,

P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock

McGuigan, Assistant Attorney 

General, Daytona Beach, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., WALLIS and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE>

<CAPTION>

EXHIBIT 11
Capitol Communities Corporation
Computation of Earnings Per Share

                                                       Fiscal Year Ended
                                                        September 30,
                                                             2002                        2001
                                                      -------------------         --------------------
<S>                                                   <C>                         <C>

Shares Outstanding Beginning of Period                         4,230,361                    4,230,361

Shares Issued During Period:
                       October 18,2001                        16,100,000
                       February 25, 2002                       4,200,000
                       March 26, 2002                            145,000
                       March 29, 2002                             75,000
                       July 30, 2002                             (13,000)
                       August 12, 2002                           775,000
                       August 20, 2002                           (47,000)
                       August 27, 2002                            (5,300)

                                                      -------------------         --------------------

Total Outstanding                                             25,460,061                    4,230,361

Weighted average number of shares outstanding                 24,742,859                    4,230,361

Shares deemed outstanding from assumed
exercise of stock options                                              -                            -
                                                      -------------------         --------------------

Total                                                         24,742,859                    4,230,361
                                                      ===================         ====================

Earnings (loss) applicable to common shares
                       Net Income                            $ 4,246,713                  $(2,115,003)
                       Preferred Dividends                       203,032                            -
                                                      -------------------         --------------------
                                                             $ 4,043,681                  $(2,115,003)
                                                      ===================         ====================


Earnings (loss) per share of common stock                        $ 0.163                     $ (0.500)
                                                      ===================         ====================

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47908-47916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-76]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-76 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 5, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 47909]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.026


[[Page 47910]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.027


[[Page 47911]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.028


[[Page 47912]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.029


[[Page 47913]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.030


[[Page 47914]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.031


[[Page 47915]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.032


[[Page 47916]]


[FR Doc. E8-18645 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C