alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


                                PROMISSORY NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promises to pay Incredible Universe the
principal sum of $640 in lawful money of the United States within 180 days of
the effective date of the merger with Smart Games Interactive, in full
settlement of its account with Smart Games Interactive, Inc., pursuant to the
following terms. It is agreed that this Promissory Note constitutes valid and
sufficient consideration to support the  Release executed between Incredible
Universe and Smart Games Interactive, Inc., which is hereby attached and
incorporated by reference into the terms of this Promissory Note.



                                              _________________________
                                              For Brandmakers Inc.

        ACKNOWLEDGE AND CONCUR





        _____________________
        For



        Brandmakers Inc. will furnish documentation's showing the effective date
of the merger to Incredible Universe and will make payment of $640 in full
within 180 days thereafter.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned officer of Summit Properties Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Date: March 12, 2004  /S/ Gregg D. Adzema
 Gregg D. Adzema
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Iftikhar Ahmed, P.A. and Farhan Khan, M.D.

Appellate case number: 01-19-00584-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-76925

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

Relators, Iftikhar Ahmed, P.A. and Farhan Khan, M.D, have filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus challenging the trial court’s June 10, 2019 new-trial order. The Court requests that real 

party in interest file a response to the petition limited to whether the trial court (1) erred in granting 

a new trial without providing case-specific reasoning and analysis and (2) abused its discretion in 

ordering new trial. A response is not necessary as to the petition’s assertion that the trial court 

lacked plenary power. The response shall be due no later than September 3, 2019.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Sarah B. Landau_____

 Acting individually 

Date: _August 13, 2019___
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4342

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend certain statutes of

limitation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to extend certain

statutes of limitation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CAPITAL OFFENSES AND CLASS A FELONIES IN4 VOLVING MURDER.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3281 of title 18, United

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows:

7 ‘‘§ 3281. Capital offenses and Class A felonies involv8 ing murder

9 ‘‘An indictment for any offense punishable by death

10 or an indictment or information for a Class A felony in-
2

•HR 4342 IH

1 volving murder (as defined in section 1111 of this title

2 or as defined under applicable State law in the case of

3 an offense under section 1963(a) of this title involving

4 racketeering activity described in section 1961(1) of this

5 title) may be found at any time without limitation.’’.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 subsection (a) shall apply to any offense for which the ap8 plicable statute of limitations had not run as of the date

9 of enactment of such subsection.

10 SEC. 2. CLASS A VIOLENT AND DRUG TRAFFICKING OF11 FENSES.

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 213 of title 18, United

13 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow14 ing:

15 ‘‘§ 3295. Class A violent and drug trafficking offenses

16 ‘‘Except as provided in section 3281, no person shall

17 be prosecuted, tried, or punished for a Class A felony that

18 is a crime of violence or a drug trafficking crime (as de19 fined in section 924(c) of this title) unless the indictment

20 is returned or the information is filed within 10 years after

21 the commission of the offense.’’.

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

23 subsection (c) shall apply to any offense for which the ap24 plicable statute of limitations had not run as of the date

25 of enactment of such subsection.
3

•HR 4342 IH

1 SEC. 3. CLERICAL AMENDMENT.

2 The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 213

3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—

4 (1) in the item relating to section 3281, by in5 serting ‘‘and Class A felonies involving murder’’ be6 fore the period; and

7 (2) adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘3295. Class A violent and drug trafficking offenses.’’.

Æ
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I, Carl
Oberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of Classic Costume Company, Inc.,
(the “Registrant”), certify that:




1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;




2.    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.    The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:




(a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)    disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and




5.    The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of
directors:




(a)    all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.




November
      12, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Carl
      ObergCarl
      ObergPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
      Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

**I,Robert M. McNutt, certify that:**

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Boise Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: 

 

a.               Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b.              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

a.               All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize,and report financial information; and 

 

b.              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Date: November 4,2008

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert M. McNutt |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Robert M. McNutt          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

** **

----
#### Edith Faurie, Appellant, v. Harry Lazelle, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
#### PERRY et al. v. LOUISIANA & A. RY. CO.

No. 4299.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1932.

For former opinion, see 142 So. 736.

White, Holloman & White, of Alexandria, and Burford & White, of Shreveport', for appellant.

J. O. Gunter, of Natchitoches, and George MeSween, of Shreveport, for appellees.

PALMER, J.

This case is now before the court on rehearing. The original opinion was rendered June 29, 1932, and is reported in 142 So. 736. In that opinion, a full statement of the case is given, so it is unnecessary to again state it.

Paragraph IX of plaintiffs’ petition alleges: “That after the train of the defendant ran over and killed the said S. L. Perry, the agents and employees of the defendant company took the body of the said S. L. Perry to Campti and there placed it on a truck without covering same, and handling it as if it were a hog or cow, which act grieved your petitioner considerably and humiliated her, and damaged her as will be hereinafter itemized.”

In Paragraph X, among other items of alleged damage, she specifies, “for mental strain, pain and suffering caused by the handling of the body, $10,000.00.”

Plaintiffs, in their brief in support of their motion for a rehearing, urged that the court failed to pass upon this issue. As a matter of fact, this particular question was not expressly considered and passed on in the original opinion, and, as plaintiffs’ counsel so earnestly urged its-importance, we granted á rehearing, primarily for the purpose of considering this point, although the rehearing was granted without restrictions. This point was not specifically discussed in our orginal opinion, for the reason that the evidence is almost wholly silent on the charge. Be that as it may, we have again examined the testimony, with particular reference to this charge, only to find that plaintiffs completely failed to sustain it. On the contrary, the evidence preponderates in favor of the fact that the defendants handled the body in a prudent manner as long as the body was in its care.

We have again examined the testimony on all the issues in the case, and conclude that our former decree is correct. Therefore the original opinion and decree of this court, rejecting plaintiffs’ demands, are accordingly reinstated.
EXHIBIT 32.3





STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.,


Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer


Dated: August 22, 2011
**Exhibit
      31.2**




**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**and
      Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427**





I,
      Samuel
      Yen, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Yifan Communications, Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report;





4.
      I
      have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
      and





b)
      evaluated the
      effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation;





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
      and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)
      all
      deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
      the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
                March 14, 2006
            /s/
                Samuel
                Yen
              Samuel
                Yen
              Principal
                Financial Officer
#### HENRY PETETIN, Inc., v. STANDARD GENERAL REALTY CO., Inc.

No. 13859.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 25, 1932.

Wm. H. MteOlendon, Jr., of New Orleans, for appellant.

Wm. Donnaud, of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

*34WBSTERFIELD, J.

This suit is for the sum of $292.50, the alleged. value of certain printing undertaken by the plaintiff for account of defendant. It is defended upon the ground that the charge is excessive. There was judgment below in plaintiff’s favor, as prayed for, and defendant has appealed.

It does not appear to us that the defense has been sustained by the evidence. According to the testimony for both sides, a profit of 25 or 30 per cent, is not unreasonable and not unusual in the printing business. Plaintiff’s profit did not exceed this figure, and, in the absence of any showing that plaintiff’s operating expenses were unusual, when compared with others in the same business, we cannot say that the charge is improper.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Albert Van Loan v. Tucker, Speyers & Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael E. Dotson, Appellant.

[678 NYS2d 311]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered July 18, 1997, convicting defendant upon his plea *907of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree and was sentenced to five years’ probation. Based upon our review of the record, we agree with defense counsel’s assertion that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted *(see, People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979, *lv denied*67 NY2d 650).

Mikoll, J. P., White, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line Company (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Christopher A. Helms, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Thomas J. Webb, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ CHRISTOPHER A. HELMS
------------------------
Name: Christopher A. Helms
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 13, 2003


/s/ THOMAS J. WEBB
------------------
Name: Thomas J. Webb
Title:   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:   March 13, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of William F. SIEWERT, Bankrupt, William F. Siewert & Co., a Corporation, Kate Siewert, Harold A. Witt, and Wilbert A. Witt, Appellants, v. Maurice KLEIN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of William F. Siewert, Bankrupt, Appellee.

No. 6121.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

April 18, 1938.

*1017Arthur J. Goldberg, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Morton B. Hochberg, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation to dismiss this appeal, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit:

“It is stipulated by and between William F. Siewert & Company, a corporation, Kate Siewert, Harold A. Witt and Wilbert A. Witt, Appellants, by Arthur J. Goldberg, their attorneyj' and Maurice Klein, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of William F. Siewert, Bankrupt, Appellee, by Morton B. Hochberg, his attorney, that the appeal herein be dismissed without costs.”

■ On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed without costs, pursuant to the foregoing stipulation.