alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MOTORVAC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,665,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,806,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,542
<INVENTORY>                                  1,197,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,019,976
<PP&E>                                         635,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                 403,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,226,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,355,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,149
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,826,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,226,510
<SALES>                                      9,879,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,879,739
<CGS>                                        5,618,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,618,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,983,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (41,696)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                315,944
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            311,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   311,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
#### Veryl Preston, Respondent, v. Union Assurance Society, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered before another referee, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the authority of *Preston*v. *Ætna Ins. Co.*(193 N. Y. 142). Settle order on notice.
|   | 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                           |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending December 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      China Advanced Construction Materials Group,  Inc. |

| Date:      February 12, 2009                    |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |
| /s/Xianfu      Han                              |
| Xianfu      HanPrincipal      Executive Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Midas Medici Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Johnson Kachidza, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Johnson KachidzaJohnson Kachidza

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                               4,546 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                         0    
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0    
<PP&E>                             739,764 
<DEPRECIATION>                      78,143 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     785,592 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0    
<BONDS>                            367,370 
<COMMON>                               167 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                             42 
<OTHER-SE>                         342,645 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       785,592 
<SALES>                               0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   117,353 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       86,277 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  20,263 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     29,700 
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 29,700 
<DISCONTINUED>                        0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0    
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                        29,700 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         1.49 
<EPS-DILUTED>                         1.49 
        


</TABLE>
1

In the event the Bankruptcy Court issues a stay prior to the conference, this

court will nonetheless proceed with its conference, the topic of discussion being

adjusted to the then-existing circumstances.

5/22/09:S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-11954.NOBLE.Conference.wpd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

IN RE:

NOBLE INTERNATIONAL, LTD., et al., Bankr. Case No. 09-51720-mbm

Case No. 09-CV-11954-DT

 /

ORDER SETTING CONFERENCE DATE

On May 19, 2009, an Emergency Motion for Leave to File Bankruptcy Appeal

was filed by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”). Having

reviewed the motion, the court has determined the necessity of an immediate

scheduling conference. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the court will conduct a scheduling conference, on the

record, on May 27, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The parties should come prepared to discuss,

among other things, whether to issue a stay of the May 28, 2009 auction date.1

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: May 22, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on

this date, May 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-11954-RHC-PJK Doc # 2 Filed 05/22/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 27
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-11288

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES MONTANYA, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES K. McGRANAHAN, Sergeant,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:98-CV-11

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Montanya, Jr., a Texas prisoner (# 593707), has

appealed the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights

complaint as frivolous. An in forma pauperis complaint may be

dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)

if it has no arguable basis in law or in fact. Siglar v.

Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997); see Denton v.

Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992). This court reviews 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) dismissals for abuse of discretion. Siglar,

112 F.3d at 193. 
No. 98-11288

-2-

Montanya argues that the district court erred in dismissing

his excessive-force claim as frivolous. “To prevail on an eighth

amendment excessive force claim, a plaintiff must establish that

force was not ‘applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or

restore discipline, [but] maliciously and sadistically to cause

harm,’ and that he suffered an injury.” Eason v. Holt, 73 F.3d

600, 601-02 (5th Cir. 1996) (quoting Hudson v. McMillian, 503

U.S. 1, 7 (1992)). The district court did not abuse its

discretion in determining that injuries alleged by Montanya were

“de minimis.” See Gomez v. Chandler, 163 F.3d 921, 924 (5th Cir.

1999); Siglar, 112 F.3d at 193. 

Montanya’s claim that Sergeant McGranahan violated prison

regulations during the alleged incidents, besides being raised

for the first time on appeal, is not cognizable under § 1983

without allegations that “constitutional minima” were also

violated. See Myers v. Klevenhagen, 97 F.3d 91, 94 (5th Cir.

1996). 

Montanya has abandoned his other claims, such as that his

personal belongings were ruined during a shake-down of his cell,

by failing to brief them on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(6).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45769-45770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18114]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or 
contacting the Office of Agreements (202)-523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f7b7d6e6b6a6e616e63767c667c4f69626c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ce8eefdf8f9fdf2fdf0e5eff5efdcfaf1ffb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Agreement No.: 011409-017.
    Title: Transpacific Carrier Services Inc. Agreement.
    Parties: American President Lines, Ltd. and APL Co. PTE Ltd.; CMA 
CGM S.A.; COSCO Container Lines Company, Ltd.; Evergreen Lines Joint 
Service Agreement; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai 
Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. 
Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha, Ltd.; Orient Overseas Container Line 
Limited; Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.; and Zim Integrated Shipping 
Services, Ltd.
    Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment would add China Shipping Container Lines 
(Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. and China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd. as 
parties to the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 011546-004.
    Title: Wallenius Wilhelmsen Lines/NYK Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Nippon Yusen Kaisha and Wallenius Wilhelmsen Logistics AS.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq., Sher & Blackwell LLP, 1850 M 
Street, NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment revises the agreement to provide for 
reciprocal chartering of space.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.


[[Page 45770]]


    Dated: August 1, 2008.
Karen V. Gregory,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18114 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IB

Union Calendar No. 7

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 666

[Report No. 104–17]

To control crime by exclusionary rule reform.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

FEBRUARY 2, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To control crime by exclusionary rule reform.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exclusionary Rule Re5 form Act of 1995’’.
2

HR 666 RH

1 SEC. 2. ADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN EVIDENCE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 223 of title 18, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow4 ing:

5 ‘‘§ 3510. Admissibility of evidence obtained by search

6 or seizure

7 ‘‘(a) EVIDENCE OBTAINED BY OBJECTIVELY REA8 SONABLE SEARCH OR SEIZURE.—Evidence which is ob9 tained as a result of a search or seizure shall not be ex10 cluded in a proceeding in a court of the United States

11 on the ground that the search or seizure was in violation

12 of the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United

13 States, if the search or seizure was carried out in cir14 cumstances justifying an objectively reasonable belief that

15 it was in conformity with the fourth amendment. The fact

16 that evidence was obtained pursuant to and within the

17 scope of a warrant constitutes prima facie evidence of the

18 existence of such circumstances.

19 ‘‘(b) EVIDENCE NOT EXCLUDABLE BY STATUTE OR

20 RULE.—

21 ‘‘(1) GENERALLY.—Evidence shall not be ex22 cluded in a proceeding in a court of the United

23 States on the ground that it was obtained in viola24 tion of a statute, an administrative rule or regula25 tion, or a rule of procedure unless exclusion is ex26 pressly authorized by statute or by a rule prescribed
3

HR 666 RH

1 by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory author2 ity.

3 ‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO OBJECTIVELY

4 REASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.—Evidence

5 which is otherwise excludable under paragraph (1)

6 shall not be excluded if the search or seizure was

7 carried out in circumstances justifying an objectively

8 reasonable belief that the search or seizure was in

9 conformity with the statute, administrative rule or

10 regulation, or rule of procedure, the violation of

11 which occasioned its being excludable.

12 ‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This section shall

13 not be construed to require or authorize the exclusion of

14 evidence in any proceeding.’’.

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

16 at the beginning of chapter 223 of title 18, United States

17 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘3510. Admissibility of evidence obtained by search or seizure.’’.
Union Calendar No. 7

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 666

[Report No. 104–17]

A BILL

To control crime by exclusionary rule reform.

FEBRUARY 2, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
#### John H. Schildmacher, as Administrator, etc., of Frederick Schildmacher, Deceased, Respondent, v. S. Liebmann’s Sons Brewing Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 531

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To designate the Great Western Scenic Trail as a study

trail under the National Trails System Act, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. POTENTIAL ADDITION OF GREAT WESTERN

4 SCENIC TRAIL TO NATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM

5 GREAT WESTERN TRAIL.

6 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16

7 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new paragraph:
2

HR 531 RFS

1 ‘‘(38) The Great Western Scenic Trail, a system of

2 trails to accommodate a variety of travel users in a cor3 ridor of approximately 3,100 miles in length extending

4 from the Arizona-Mexico border to the Idaho-Montana5 Canada border, following the approximate route depicted

6 on the map identified as ‘Great Western Trail Corridor,

7 1988’, which shall be on file and available for public in8 spection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service,

9 United States Department of Agriculture. The trail study

10 shall be conducted by the Secretary of Agriculture, in con11 sultation with the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance

12 with subsection (b) and shall include—

13 ‘‘(A) the current status of land ownership and

14 current and potential use along the designated route;

15 ‘‘(B) the estimated cost of acquisition of lands

16 or interests in lands, if any; and

17 ‘‘(C) an examination of the appropriateness of

18 motorized trial use along the trail.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 14,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
##### 



Exhibit 10.15
 Description of the Reinsurance Agreement for 2006 between ACIC, BCIC and
GE Reinsurance Corporation and Max Re Ltd. effective January 1, 2006
  LIABILITY OF THE REINSURER
  Loss Layer
    
    Reinsurer
    
    Comment$800,000 excess of $200,000
    
    50.0% GE Reinsurance Corporation
50.0% Max Re Ltd.
    
    *$4,000,000 excess $1,000,000
    
    100.0% GE Reinsurance Corporation
    
    *
 *
    
    All business written by the Company.
Recoveries from the MN WCRA will inure to the benefit of this treaty
 COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION
   REINSURANCE PREMIUM
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Sona
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended December 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Monika
Sagar, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
January 27, 2009








MONIKA
SAGAR


Monika
Sagar


Chief
Accounting Officer


Chief
Financial Officer and Director








-1-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DENISE E. KINSORA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-11507

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [14]

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s July 23, 2010

Report and Recommendation, [Docket Text # 14]. Being fully advised in the premises and

having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including Defendant’s objections if any, the

Court hereby ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgement is GRANTED, Defendant’s

motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner is

REVERSED. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is hereby

REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with

the Report and Recommendation.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: August 26, 2010
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on August 26, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager