alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO. 11

                        ROTARY POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Twelve Months Ended December 31,
                                                                 2000            1999
                                                             ------------    ------------
<S>                                                          <C>             <C>
BASIC

Shares outstanding, beginning of period                         6,212,855       6,112,855

Weighted average number of shares issued, retired
and issuable share equivalents                                  2,408,100          66,667

Weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding                                   8,620,955       6,179,522
                                                             ============    ============
Net loss                                                     $ (2,184,230)   $   (378,326)
                                                             ============    ============

Net Loss per common share                                    $      (0.25)   $      (0.06)
                                                             ============    ============

DILUTED
Weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding as adjusted to full dilution     10,493,086       6,987,855
                                                             ============    ============

Net loss                                                     $ (2,184,230)   $   (378,326)
                                                             ============    ============

Net loss per common share                                    $      (0.21)   $      (0.05)
                                                             ============    ============
</TABLE>

*     These calculations are submitted in accordance with SEC requirements,
      although they are not in accordance with FAS No. 128 because they are
      anti-dilutive
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48242-48243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Southwest Research Institute: The Consortium 
for NASGRO Development and Support

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 22, 2008, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 5 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute 
Cooperative Research Group on the Consortium for NASGRO Development and 
Support (``NASGRO'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in the membership and project status of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, the period of 
performance has been extended to June 30, 2010. The following parties 
have been added as parties to this venture: Lockheed Martin 
Corporation, Cherry Hill, NJ; Bombardier Aerospace, Montreal, Quebec, 
Canada; and Spirit Aerosystems, Wichita, KS.
    In addition, Northrop Grumman Corporation, Melbourne, FL has 
withdrawn as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NASGRO intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 3, 2001, NASGRO filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 22, 2002 (67 FR 2910).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 18, 
2004 and

[[Page 48243]]

published in the Federal Register on November 22, 2004 (69 FR 67950).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E8-18880 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          RTW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    1996          1997          1998
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
<S>                                             <C>           <C>           <C>
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING        11,774,147    11,832,720     11,926,819

STOCK WARRANTS                                        4,325             -             -

STOCK OPTIONS
    Options at $25.00                                    57             -             -
    Options at $19.33                                 7,013             -             -
    Options at $16.67                                 1,446             -             -
    Options at $12.50                                 3,424             -             -
    Options at $10.75                                     -           919             -
    Options at $ 8.67                                44,254         4,955             -
    Options at $ 7.13                                     -            95             -
    Options at $ 6.75                                     -           357             -
    Options at $ 2.67                                69,619        54,065             -
    Options at $ 2.00                               232,333       186,018             -
    Options at $ 0.53                                     -             -             -
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON 
    SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING                12,136,618    12,079,129     11,926,891
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------

NET INCOME (LOSS) ($000'S)                           $8,982        $5,799        ($7,018)
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------

INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
    BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE                     $0.76         $0.49         ($0.59)
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
    DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE                   $0.74         $0.48         ($0.59)
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
                                                ------------  ------------  -------------
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 17, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50155

Conference Calendar

CLARENCE LEE CALLIES, JR., 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CV-1149

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clarence Lee Callies, Jr., federal prisoner # 13001-180,

has filed a motion for a certificate of appealability (COA) to

appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

application as untimely. Callies seeks to challenge his 1996

Texas conviction and sentence for drug possession. Callies

contends that he exercised “due diligence” in filing his
No. 06-50155

-2-

application and that the limitation period should be waived; he

also argues the merits of the challenge to his conviction.

Callies has not shown “that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial

of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find

it debatable whether the district court was correct in its

procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

Callies’s motion for a COA is denied. 

Callies has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

(IFP) and for appointment of counsel. These motions are denied.

This court recently warned Callies that frivolous filings

would result in the imposition of sanctions. United States v.

Callies, 158 F. App’x 585, 587 (5th Cir. 2005). Nonetheless,

Callies has proceeded with an untimely application for relief

from a conviction that is now more than 10 years old. Therefore,

Callies is ordered to pay a sanction in the amount of $100,

payable to the clerk of this court. The clerk of this court and

the clerks of all federal district courts within this circuit are

directed to refuse to file any civil complaint or appeal by

Callies unless Callies submits proof of satisfaction of this

sanction. If Callies attempts to file any further notices of

appeal or original proceedings in this court without such proof

the clerk will docket them for administrative purposes only. Any

other submissions which do not show proof that the sanction has

been paid will be neither addressed nor acknowledged. This
No. 06-50155

-3-

sanction is imposed in addition to all other sanctions currently

in force against Callies.

COA DENIED; IFP DENIED; APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED;

SANCTION IMPOSED.
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ranell Jacobson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Fortis Life Insurance Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2005     /s/ Ranell Jacobson    Ranell Jacobson Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 10.11
 
 2006CERTIFICATE OF REINSURANCE  for the  Agreement of  Reinsurance  between the  WORKERS COMPENSATION REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION  and  RTW Inc
 American Compensation Insurance Company 0030392
Bloomington Compensation Insurance Company 0012311
 Coverage Period:
    
    January 1, 2006  December 31, 2006
    
    Retention Limit:
    
    $
    390,000(12:01 a.m. Standard Time)
  Workers Compensation Reinsurance Association-s- Carl W. Cummins IIICarl W. Cummins IIIPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDated: December 27, 2005
 ®
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4172

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide an exemption

from the overtime requirements of that Act for law enforcement employees while at a police academy or other training facility pursuant to

an agreement between the public agency employing such employee and

representatives of such employee.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Mr. CONDIT (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. RIGGS, Mr.

FAZIO of California, Ms. LOFGREN, and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and

Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide

an exemption from the overtime requirements of that

Act for law enforcement employees while at a police

academy or other training facility pursuant to an agreement between the public agency employing such employee

and representatives of such employee.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Law Enforcement

5 Training Act’’.
2

•HR 4172 IH

1 SEC. 2. OVERTIME EXEMPTION FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT

2 EMPLOYEES AT TRAINING FACILITY.

3 Section 13(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

4 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)) is amended by striking the pe5 riod at the end of paragraph (30) and inserting ‘‘; or’’

6 and by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(31) any employee who is employed in law en8 forcement activities by a public agency which is a

9 State or an interstate governmental agency while

10 such employee is in attendance—

11 ‘‘(A) at apprenticeship training programs

12 certified and approved by the Bureau of Ap13 prenticeship Training of the Department of

14 Labor, and

15 ‘‘(B) pursuant to applicable provisions of a

16 collective bargaining agreement, memorandum

17 of understanding, or other agreement between

18 the public agency and representatives of such

19 employee.

20 For purposes of paragraph (31), an employee is employed

21 in law enforcement activities if such employee is a uni22 formed or plainclothed member of a body of officers and

23 subordinates who are empowered by State statute or local

24 ordinance to enforce laws designed to maintain public

25 peace and order, to protect both life and property from

26 accidental or willful injury, and to prevent and detect
3

•HR 4172 IH

1 crimes and who has the power to arrest. Such term in2 cludes any employee working in a correctional facility.’’.

Æ
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 100 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- CA

- 004196

_____________________________
SFR S ERVICES , LLC a/a/o W ILLIAM V IRG I LIO and J ACQUELINE V IRGILIO , Appellant
,

v.

T OWER H ILL P RIME I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

. Michael T. McHugh , Judge.

May 14, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA, WOZNIAK and SM ITH , JJ., c oncur.

Erin M. Berger and Melissa A. Giasi, of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

C. Ryan Jones and Scot E. Samis, of Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DIS POSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 29, 2014

p0122

Order 

Clerk

January 29, 2014

147093

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147093

COA: 314431

St. Joseph CC: 11-017611-FH

MASON ALAN FULLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration, as on leave granted, of the issue whether the police officers unlawfully 

expanded a “knock and talk” procedure by entering the defendant’s backyard and 

walking onto a wooden deck, which was attached to the home, and, if a constitutional 

violation occurred, whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies 

under these facts. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

I, Anthony R. Cole, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4 The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 24, 2009



/s/ Anthony R. ColeAnthony R. ColeExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Paul HORNE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 4272.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1938.

Harold D. Cooley, of Nashville, N. C., for appellant.

J. O. Carr, U. S. Atty., of Wilmington, N. C., Charles F. Rouse, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Kinston, N. C., and John H. Manning, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Raleigh, N. C.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of District Court affirmed. Judgment filed.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.01

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

     Concord Communications Securities Corporation
     600 Nickerson Road
     Marlboro, MA  01752
     State of incorporation: Massachusetts

     Empire Technologies, Inc.
     2675 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 150
     Atlanta, GA  30339
     State of incorporation: Georgia

     Concord Communications International, Inc.
     600 Nickerson Road
     Marlboro, MA 01752
     State of incorporation: Delaware

     CCA Holdings, Inc.
     600 Nickerson Road
     Marlboro, MA 01752
     State of incorporation: Delaware

     FirstSense Software, Inc.
     600 Nickerson Road
     Marlboro, MA 01752
     State of incorporation: Delaware
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE
ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Warren G. Lichtenstein, certify that:

1.       I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Steel Connect, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2018;
and

2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.

Date: December 17, 2018

|By: | /s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein     
|--- | -------------------------------
|    | Warren G. Lichtenstein         
|    | Interim Chief Executive Officer
|    | (Principal Executive Officer)