alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT  ON   FORM  10-K  AND  IS  QUALIFIED   IN ITS  ENTIRETY   BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        5,090
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          282
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   9,588
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       38,779
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         37,299
<LOANS>                                     191,514
<ALLOWANCE>                                   1,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              250,676
<DEPOSITS>                                  165,325
<SHORT-TERM>                                 57,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           4,689
<LONG-TERM>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        228
<OTHER-SE>                                   23,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              250,676
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              14,783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                             3,448
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             18,231
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            7,340
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,889
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         7,001
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   267
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               4,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,655
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,383
<EPS-BASIC>                                    2.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 2.93
<LOANS-NON>                                     737
<LOANS-PAST>                                    314
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                531
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                               1,978
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1,318
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    91
<RECOVERIES>                                     19
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             1,577
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          1,577
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0



</TABLE>
18377.

#### St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. *et al. v.*Idov.

Candler, Justice.

On application therefor, certiorari was granted by this court to review a judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals in this litigation. The case involves the method to be employed in computing compensation under an amendment of 1945 to the Georgia Workmen’s Compensation Act (Ga. L. 1945, p. 486; Code, Ann. Supp., § 114-402). As the record shows, the deceased employee had been concurrently employed as a retail salesman by three different employers for a continuous period of more than thirteen weeks immediately prior to his death. *No*question has been raised about liability, the only issue being the amount of compensation which should be paid. The State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, by using the formula prescribed by Code (Ann. Supp.) § 114-402 (1), found the average weekly wage of the deceased by adding together the wages which he had received from the three employers for whom he had concurrently worked for the thirteen weeks immediately preceding his death, and by dividing that total amount by thirteen. Based upon his average weekly wage, as thus ascertained, an award of compensation was made to those entitled under the compensation act to such benefits. On appeal to the superior court having jurisdiction of the cause, the presiding judge sustained the award made by the board, and on a writ of error to the Court of Appeals his judgment was affirmed. The Court of Appeals, in deciding the case, applied the doctrine of concurrent similar employment; and, in doing so, followed the courts of last resort in eight other States where statutes like that of ours were being construed and applied in dealing with a question such as the one presently before us. Since the instant case was argued in this court, we have further considered the ruling here complained of, re-examined the authorities cited and relied upon by the parties as well as those found by us — both of our own State and of others — and have reached the conclusion that the judgment complained of is not erroneous for any reason assigned in the application for certiorari; and having so concluded, it necessarily follows that the writ of certiorari was improvidently granted by this court and should be dis*257missed. See, in this connection, *First Nat. Bank of Atlanta*v. *Williams,*191 *Ga.*611 (13 S. E. 2d 361); *Hurley*v. *City of Atlanta,*208 *Ga. 457*(67 S. E. 2d 571); *Hodges*v. *State,*209 *Ga.*283 (71 S. E. 2d 543), and the cases there cited.

Argued October 14, 1953

Decided November 10, 1953

Rehearing denied November 25, 1953.

*Moise, Post & Gardner, Hugh E. Wright, Ed Lane, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*White, Douglas & Arnold, Edward S. White, Hamilton Douglas, Jr., Boss Arnold,*contra.

*Writ of certiorari dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Duckworth, C. J., not participating.*°
EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                STATE OF INCORPORATION       DOES BUSINESS AS
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------- -----------------
<S>                                       <C>                          <C>
Arch Canada Inc.                          Ontario, Canada
Arch Communications Enterprises LLC       Delaware                     Arch Paging
Arch Communications, Inc.                 Delaware
Arch Connecticut Valley, Inc.             Massachusetts                Arch Paging
Arch Paging, Inc.                         Delaware                     Arch Paging
Benbow Investments, Inc.                  Delaware
MobileMedia Communications, Inc.          Delaware
MobileMedia Communications
  Corporation of America, Inc.            Delaware                     Arch Paging
MobileMedia License Co., LLC              Delaware
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRASSIE GOLF CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         188,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  512,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,771,045
<PP&E>                                       6,030,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                 742,956
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,973,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,869,574
<BONDS>                                      3,513,041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        283
<COMMON>                                        42,633
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,547,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,973,500
<SALES>                                        744,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,093,599
<CGS>                                          389,755
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,660,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,826,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,594,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,987,034)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,987,034)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,987,034)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 11288 and # 11289]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 8.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1768-DR), dated 06/14/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/05/2008 through 07/25/2008.                    

*Effective Date:*                         07/29/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/15/2008.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/13/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Wisconsin, dated 06/14/2008 is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to 09/15/2008.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-18797 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(No. 333-95431, No. 333-33938, No. 333-43196, No. 333-44128and No. 333-58916) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-76324, No. 333-09135,No. 333-57141, 333-40940, No. 333-65084 and No. 333-106280)of NMS Communications Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2006relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston, MassachusettsMarch 16, 2006

----
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1


FIRST AMENDMENT
MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION
2017 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
This Instrument, amending the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan, is made by MTS Systems Corporation, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”) and shall be effective as of January 31, 2020, subject to approval of the increase in the number of authorized shares by the shareholders of the Company.
WHEREAS, the Company adopted, effective as of June 6, 2017, the MTS Systems Corporation 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which Plan was approved at a meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on that date; and
WHEREAS, Section 12.1 of the Plan reserves to the Compensation and Leadership Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of the Company the authority to amend the Plan from time to time, subject to the limitations contained in that Section and the Committee desires to amend the Plan to increase the number of Shares available under the Plan by 500,000 Shares;
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
		
	1.
	The number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan is hereby increased by an additional 500,000 Shares, to an aggregate of 2,000,000 Shares and Section 3.1 is amended to read as follows:


3.1    AGGREGATE SHARES AUTHORIZED.
The aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan is Two Million (2,000,000) Shares.  In addition, Shares subject to awards currently outstanding under the Company’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2011 Plan) that are terminated, cancelled, surrendered or forfeited without the delivery of Shares may be reissued at the discretion of the Committee under the Plan.  As of June 6, 2017, no further grants are permitted under the 2011 Plan. The aggregate number of Shares described above are subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.4. Such Shares shall be reserved, to the extent that the Company deems appropriate, from authorized but unissued Shares, and from Shares which have been reacquired by the Company. 
		
	2.
	Section 3.3(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


		
	(a)
	No more than Two Million (2,000,000) Shares may be used for Incentive Stock Options;


		
	3.
	Upon approval of this Amendment by the shareholders, the Plan shall be conformed to reflect the changes made by this Amendment.


		
	4.
	Except as amended above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


Adopted by the Compensation and Leadership Committee of the Board of Directors on November 11, 2019
Approved by the Shareholders of the Company on February 11, 2020
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in Post Effective  Amendment No. 1
to Registration  Statement No. 33-94914 on Form S-8,  Registration No. 333-30237
on Form S-8 and Registration  No. 333-22535 on Form S-3 of Hirsch  International
Corp. and  Subsidiaries of our report dated April 10, 2003,  except for Note 14,
which is as of April 28, 2003,  appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of
Hirsch International Corp. and Subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2003.



By: /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
    --------------------
    BDO Seidman, LLP
    Melville, New York
    April 29, 2003
#### In the Matter of the Proof and Probate of the Last Will and Testament of William H. Kirkholder, Deceased.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009  (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gregory L. Paige, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gregory L. Paige
 
 Chief
Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Royalty Asset Holdings II, LP, Noble 

Energy, Inc., Charlotte Poe, Trustee of the 

Gerhardt Family Trust, Harold Schneider, 

TD Minerals LLC and Sourcing Rock, 

LLC, 

 

 Appellants,

v.

Bayswater Fund III-A LLC, Bayswater 

Fund III-B LLC, Bayswater Resources 

LLC, Colburn Oil, LP, Ditto Land 

Company, LLC, Fall Land & Cattle, LLC, 

Pegasus Resources, LLC, and Robbins 

Family Minerals, LP,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00108-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas 

(TC# 21-03-23912-CVR)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court are the petitions for permissive appeal filed by Royalty Asset 

Holdings II, LP, Noble Energy, Inc., Charlotte Poe, Trustee of the Gerhardt Family Trust, Harold 

Schneider, TD Minerals LLC and Sourcing Rock, LLC. See TEX.R.APP.P. 28.3. The petitions

are GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 28.3(k), the notices of appeal are deemed to have been filed 

by Royalty Asset Holdings II, LP, Noble Energy, Inc., Charlotte Poe, Trustee of the Gerhardt 

Family Trust, Harold Schneider, TD Minerals LLC and Sourcing Rock, LLC on the date of this 
2

order and the appeal will be governed by the rules applicable to accelerated appeals. Royalty 

Asset Holdings II, LP, Noble Energy, Inc., Charlotte Poe, Trustee of the Gerhardt Family Trust, 

Harold Schneider, TD Minerals LLC and Sourcing Rock, LLC are directed to take all necessary 

steps to cause the appellate record to be filed. See TEX.R.APP.P. 34.5, 34.6. The clerk’s record 

and the reporter’s record, if any, are due to be filed no later than July 21, 2022. The Clerk of the 

Court shall file a copy of this order with the trial court clerk. See TEX.R.APP.P. 28.3(k). 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
#### Mechanics and Traders’ Bank, Respondent, v. J. W. O’Bannon, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Mo opinion.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 578

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, geophysical,

and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and development costs,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 19, 1995

Mr. HAYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, geophysical, and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and development costs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, AND SURFACE

4 CASING COSTS TREATED LIKE INTANGIBLE

5 DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 263 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to intangible

8 drilling and development costs in the case of oil and gas
2

•HR 578 IH

1 wells and geothermal wells) is amended by inserting before

2 the last sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case

3 of oil and gas wells, the tax treatment which applies to

4 the taxpayer’s intangible drilling and development costs

5 shall also apply to surface casing costs and to geological

6 and geophysical costs for the purpose of ascertaining the

7 existence, location, extent, or quality of any deposit of oil

8 or gas within the United States (within the meaning of

9 section 638(1)) or a possession of the United States (with10 in the meaning of section 638(2)).’’

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph (B)

12 of section 57(a)(2) of such Code is amended by adding

13 at the end the following new flush sentence:

14 ‘‘For purposes of clause (i), the term ‘intangible

15 drilling and development costs’ includes surface

16 casing costs and geological and geophysical

17 costs described in section 263(c).’’.

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

19 this section shall apply to costs paid or incurred after the

20 date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending

21 after such date.

Æ
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-05-00792- CV
K e vin Le on G aul t, App e lla nt

v. Ram ona Yvonn e G ault, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WILLI AMSO N COUNTY , 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 01-3 83- F 395, HO NORAB LE MICH AEL JERGINS, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant Ke vin L eon Ga ult filed his notice of appe al on November 1, 2005, and the a pp e llate re c or d w a s file d on De c e mbe r 2, 200 5. Th is Court gra nte d ap pe lla

nt a n e xten sio n o f t ime until Ma rc h 2 2, 20 06 , to fi le his brie f. On Marc h 2 8, 20 06 , th e Cle rk of th is Co urt se nt n oti c e to appellant that his brief

was overdue and that his appe al would be dismissed for w ant of prose cution if he did no t r e sp on d to thi s Co ur t by Ap ri l 7, 20 06. To dat e, app e lla nt h a s n ot r e sp on de d to thi s Court ’s no tice . A c c or din g ly , w e dis mis s th e a pp e a l f or wa nt o f p ro se c uti on . T e x. R. A pp . P. 42.3(b), ( c).

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pemberton Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: June 9, 2006