U.S. flag
      An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.
        Here's how you know
      Here's how you know**Official websites use .gov**
            
            A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
      **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
            
            A **lock** (
            A locked padlock
            ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Menu

      
        close

            
            
                                              About NIJ
        
                    
  
          About NIJ
      
    
          The NIJ Director
          How NIJ Is Organized
          Mission and Guiding Principles
          Research and Development Process
          Strategic Framework
          Assessments of NIJ
          Annual Reports & Reports to Congress
          Staff Directory
          Funding & Awards
        
                    
  
          Funding & Awards
      
    
          Current Funding
          Forthcoming Funding
          Expired Funding
          Awards: Listing of Funded Projects
          Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
          Fellowship & Student Programs
          Travel Scholarships
          NIJ Challenge Program
          Library & Multimedia
        
                    
  
          Library & Multimedia
      
    
          NIJ Journal
          Podcasts
          Publications Listing
          Multimedia Listing
          Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
          Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
          Software & Databases
          Datasets
          Patents
          Topics
        
                    
  
          Topics
      
    
          Article Listing
          Corrections
          Courts
          Crime Prevention
          Crimes
          Drugs and Crime
          Equipment and Technology
          Forensic Sciences
          Youth Justice
          Justice System Reform
          Law Enforcement
          Tribal Crime and Justice
          Victims of Crime
          Events
        
                    
  
          Events
      
    
          NIJ 2024 Research Conference
          Scheduled Events
          On-Demand Events
          Research Meetings & Workshops
          NIJ-Hosted Online Training

                            
                                About
          Contact Us
          Subscribe
          Topics A-Z
                  Share
FacebookXLinkedInRedditPinterestEmail Home
                            Library & Multimedia
 Multilevel Analysis of Community Effects on Criminal Sentencing
NCJ Number
              212720
Journal

*Justice Quarterly* Volume: 22 Issue: 4 Dated: December 2005 Pages: 452-487
Author(s)
          Noelle E. Fearn
Date Published

December 2005
Length
              36 pages
Annotation
              This study tested hypotheses regarding the impact of a community's characteristics on the sentences received by offenders convicted by a community's courts.
Abstract
              The data analyzed were from the 1998 State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS) data collection, merged with a unique county-level dataset that provided information on characteristics of the counties in which the defendants were adjudicated. Collected biennially since 1990, the SCPS provides detailed legal and extra-legal information on a large sample of felony defendants, representing all felony cases filed in the 75 most populous U.S. urban counties, composing more than one-third of the Nation's population and approximately one-half of all reported crimes. The dependent variable was the sentence received, coded as prison incarceration, jail confinement, or noncustodial sanction. Community-level variables were income inequality, population density, racial composition, age structure, sex ratio, religious affiliation, political orientation, violent crime rate, located in the South, and the presence of sentencing guidelines. Individual-level variables were race, sex, criminal history, type of offense, type of adjudication, and representation by a public defender. The findings show that defendants adjudicated in communities with a relatively high degree of income inequality, larger proportions of evangelical/fundamentalists, and higher violent-crime rates were significantly more likely to receive prison incarceration. Being adjudicated in the South, population density, racial composition, age structure, sex ratio, political affiliation, and sentencing guidelines did not have an impact on the sentences received. The results suggest that there remains a statistically significant amount of sentencing variation across counties after controlling for relevant individual-level and community-level factors. The implications of these findings for research, theory, and policymaking are discussed. 4 tables and 108 references
      
  
          Additional Details
Grant Number(s)
        2002-IJ-CX-0003


  
  
        
  Agencies
        NIJ-Sponsored


  
  
        
  Publication Type
        Report (Study/Research)
    
  
  
Date Published: December 1, 2005
    
          Downloads
        
                      HTML

Related Datasets
        
                      http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03923
Side navigation
  

        

  
  
              NIJ Journal
    
      
            
            
            
      Podcasts
    
      
            
            
            
      Publications Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Multimedia Listing
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions
    
      
            
            
            
      Software & Databases
    
      
            
            
            
      Datasets
    
      
            
            
            
      PatentsRelated Topics
        
                Court Procedures
        NIJ Grant-related Documents
        Sentencing factors
        Research and development
        Social and Behavioral Science



  
Similar Publications
        
                      Commentary On: Thompson WC. Uncertainty in Probabilistic Genotyping of Low Template DNA: A Case Study Comparing STRmixTM and TrueAlleleTM
                  Technical Note – Direct Analysis In Real Time Mass Spectrometry (DART-MS)
                  Just Science Podcast: Just Lessons Learned in Forensic Technology Transition
 Top

      National Institute of Justice

        
        
                        About NIJ
                    About NIJ
      
    
                  How NIJ Is Organized
      
    
                  NIJ Director
      
    
                  Research Disclaimer
      
    
                  Funding & Awards
                    Funding & Awards Home
      
    
                  Awards Listing
      
    
                  Current Funding
      
    
                  Guidance for Applicants and Awardees
      
    
                  Resources
                    Events
      
    
                  Podcasts
      
    
                  Publications
      
    
                  Topics
      
    
                  Multimedia
      
    
                  Reuse Policy
      
    
                  Contacts
                    Contact NIJ
      
    
                  Staff Directory
      
    
                  Submit a FOIA Request
      
    
                  File a Civil Rights ComplaintFacebook
          
                      X
          
                      YouTube
  

      810 7th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20531
      
              Secondary Footer link menu
            Accessibility
              Plain Language
              Privacy Policy
              Legal Policies and Disclaimer
              No FEAR Act
              Freedom of Information Act
              USA.gov
              Justice.gov