alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,418
<SECURITIES>                                     7,038
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,309
<INVENTORY>                                        220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,708
<PP&E>                                           5,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,875
<OTHER-SE>                                       (187)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,872
<SALES>                                         20,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,286
<CGS>                                            5,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        95
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.91)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Eltron International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File number 33-80233) and
Form S-3 (File numbers 333-2530 and 333-6157) of our report dated February
24, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Eltron
International, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and for the years ended December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP

Sherman Oaks, California
March 28, 1997
#### Andrew Langdon, Appellant, v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, with costs to respondent against appellant. (See 116 App. Div. 558.) All concurred, except Robson, J., who dissented; Kruse, J., not sitting.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.22
 
September 5, 1996
 
Brian D. Owen
MapInfo Corporation
One Global View
Troy, NY 12180
 
Subject: Amendment to Employment Agreement
 
Dear Brian:
 
This letter, when signed by you, will constitute an amendment to your November
2, 1992, Amended and Restated Employment agreement with MapInfo. Your salary
shall be paid at an annualized rate of $215,000, retroactive to October 1,
1995.
 
Your responsibilities shall continue as at present with active participation
in management to terminate on September 30, 1996. Until the earlier of June
30, 1997 or your obtaining new employment, you will remain an employee in an
advisory capacity to the Chairman. Regardless, you will continue to be paid
until June 30, 1997 at the $215,000 annualized rate. While you are an
employee, you will continue to be eligible for coverage under the MapInfo
benefits plans covering medical and dental insurance, life insurance, vision
care, disability coverage, the 401(k) Plan (subject to plan rules), and the
Section 125 Plan. Upon your obtaining new employment, your participation in
these benefits plans will cease. If you have not secured new employment by
July 1, 1997, you will be eligible to purchase medical coverage under COBRA,
the details of which are available from the human resources director.
 
When you sign this Agreement, you shall return to MapInfo every option you
have been granted at an exercise price above $1.74 per share. All your $1.74
options remain exercisable in accordance with the terms of the November 2,
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, and the stock option agreement
documents you signed when you received the options. Your official last day of
employment shall be the earlier of June 30, 1997 or your securing new
employment, and shall commence the ninety (90) day stock option exercise
window permitted under the stock option agreement.
 
Except as specifically stated above, this letter agreement supersedes and
replaces all prior agreements between the Company and you, other than the
following sections of your November 2, 1992 agreement, which survive and
continue in full force and effect: Non-Competition, #5--Expenses, #7--Stock
Options, #10--Indemnity (through the earlier of June 30, 1997 or your
obtaining new employment), #11--Amendment, #12--Notices, #14--Successors and
Assigns, and #16--Governing Law. This contains our entire agreement.
 
MapInfo Corporation                       Agreed and Accepted:
 
 
         /s/ Michael D. Marvin                       /s/ Brian D. Owen
By___________________________________     By___________________________________
Michael D. Marvin                         Brian D. Owen
Chairman of the Board
The Honorable Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth

*

Circuit, sitting by designation

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 09a0570n.06

No. 08-6058

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MIDWEST MEDIA PROPERTY, LLC; et

al.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF ERLANGER, KENTUCKY, and

CITY OF FORT WRIGHT, KENTUCKY,

Defendants - Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Before: GILMAN, COOK and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. *

FARRIS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Midwest Media Property is a company that erects and operates

advertising signs. The two defendant cities denied Midwest's sign applications in

2005 on the grounds that the proposed signs violated city ordinances prohibiting

signs that promoted businesses not located on the premises where the sign was

located. Midwest challenged the off-premises restrictions, which the cities have
since repealed. The district court nevertheless granted summary judgment to the

cities on the ground that the proposed signs also violated the cities' size-and-height

ordinances and thus could have been denied on that basis. For that reason, the

court concluded that Midwest had suffered no redressable injury. Midwest has

appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

“Time, place, and manner” speech regulations survive First Amendment

scrutiny if 1) they are content-neutral, 2) they are narrowly tailored 3) to serve a

significant government interest, and 4) “they leave open ample alternative

channels for communication of the information.” Prime Media, Inc. v. City of

Brentwood, 398 F.3d 814, 818 (6th Cir. 2005). Restrictions on the size and height

of signs, such as those established by the defendant cities, satisfy this test. Id. at

819–24. 

That the cities’ sign ordinances lack applicable statements of purpose does

not establish grounds for reversal. Size and height restrictions advance a

significant government interest in city aesthetics and traffic safety. Id. at 820–21. 

The cities need not prove that this interest actually motivated their regulations’

enactment. See Jobe v. City of Catlettsburg, 409 F.3d 261, 268 (6th Cir. 2005)

(upholding a content-neutral speech regulation that included no statement of

purpose and whose original, motivating purpose the city’s mayor did not know). 
The plaintiffs have not suggested that some impermissible purpose underlies

the cities’ size and height restrictions. Where there is “no claim . . . that [the city]

has as an ulterior motive the suppression of speech, and the judgment involved

here is not so unusual as to raise suspicions in itself[,]” we will not suspect “an

impermissible purpose.” Metromedia, Inc. v. City of S.D., 453 U.S. 490, 510

(1981). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  November
      17, 2008
            /s/
      Zhiguang ZhangBy:  Zhiguang
      ZhangIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratasys, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, S.
Scott Crump, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 12, 2004                           By:  /s/ S. Scott Crump
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     S. Scott Crump
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Theodore H.
Torbeck, certify that this annual report on Form 10-K of Remington Arms
Company, Inc., to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. Date: March
30, 2009

/s/
 Theodore H. TorbeckTheodore
 H. TorbeckChief
 Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         227,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,932
<PP&E>                                       9,468,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,234,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,676,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,312
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,159,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,234,292
<SALES>                                      4,139,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,210,842
<CGS>                                        1,895,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,895,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,687,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             826,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (199,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (143,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.020)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Application of Air Greco, Inc. D/B/A Wings Air for Commuter 
Authority

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2008-8-9), Docket DOT-OST-
2008-0154.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Air 
Greco, Inc. d/b/a Wings Air fit, willing, and able, and awarding it 
Commuter Air Carrier Authorization.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
August 21, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2008-0154 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, 
and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Pittaway, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room W86-467), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

    Dated: August 12, 2008.
Michael W. Reynolds,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. E8-19055 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

MICHAEL FRANCIS P. BRADLEY,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2569 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 148 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 77283

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8

th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of the Verified 

Statement of Resignation, Michael Francis P. Bradley is disbarred on consent from the 

Bar of this Commonwealth, see Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the provisions 

of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to 

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
18303.

#### Jones *et al. v.*American Tire Co. *of*Buckhead, Inc.

Almand, Justice.

American Tire Company of Buckhead, Inc., brought an equitable petition against Claude Y. Jones and his wife, which alleged in substance that the plaintiff had obtained a judgment against Claude V. Jones, doing business as Glass Sales Company, that execution issued thereon, and the Sheriff of Fulton County has returned a nulla bona on the same; that said Jones was conveying all of his assets to his wife and brother; that he has removed from his place of business automobile tires and rims, which he is concealing at a place unknown to the plaintiff; that said Jones has an equity in five trucks and automobiles, and is insolvent. The prayers were for the appointment of a receiver, and for an order restraining said Jones from transferring any of his assets or property. General and special demurrers of the defendants were *111overruled, and error is assigned on this order in a bill of exceptions. *Held:*

Argued September 16, 1953

Decided October 14, 1953.

*Roscoe Pickett, Jr., J. E. B. Stewart,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Charles W. Bergman,*contra.

The petition set out a cause of action for the appointment of a receiver and for injunctive relief *(Young*v. *Wilson,*183 *Ga.*59, 187 S. E. 44; *Pope*v. *United States Fidelity*&c. *Co.,*193 *Ga.*769, 20 S. E. 2d 13), and it was not error to overrule the demurrers.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                          75,556
<SECURITIES>                     5,701
<RECEIVABLES>                   20,302
<ALLOWANCES>                     5,207
<INVENTORY>                        556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               175,880
<PP&E>                          18,110
<DEPRECIATION>                   3,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               1,446,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          163,955
<BONDS>                        295,426
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                           834
<OTHER-SE>                     933,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 1,446,644
<SALES>                        144,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               144,773
<CGS>                           35,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   35,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               158,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 3,657
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              32,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (82,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                   (32,970)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (49,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                   (49,303)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.70)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, NO. 09-CR-20297

-vs- HON. GERALD E. ROSEN

D-4 AUSTIN GOMAN,

Defendant.

______________________________/

MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT AND CANCEL

UNEXECUTED ARREST WARRANT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT THEREOF

The United States of America hereby moves this Court for leave to dismiss the

Indictment and First Superseding Indictment against Austin Goman in this case for the

reason that the ends of justice would best be served by this dismissal. Rule 48(a) of

the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provides that "[t]he government may, with

leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint."

The government also requests this Court to cancel the unexecuted arrest

warrants for Austin Goman, which are based on the Indictment and First Superseding

Indictment.

s/Stephen L. Hiy ama s/With Consent of Barbara L. McQuade

STEPHEN L. HIYAMA United States Attorney

Assistant United States Attorney

211 West Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

tel. 313-226-9674

e-mail: stephen.hiyama@usdoj.gov

bar no.: 32236

Dated: May 24, 2012

5:09-cr-20297-GER-VMM Doc # 60 Filed 05/24/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 344
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


Summit Properties Inc.
Calculation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars In Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     1997         1996         1995         1994          1993
                                                    -------      -------      -------      -------      --------
<S>                                                 <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>      
Income (loss) before minority interest of
   unitholders in Operating Partnership and
   extraordinary items                              $31,934      $21,187      $15,051      $ 8,527      ($ 5,858)
Interest:
   Expense incurred                                  20,902       16,113       13,715       13,006        25,286
   Amortization of deferred financing costs           1,057        1,025        1,087        1,061         1,114
                                                    -------      -------      -------      -------      --------
      Total                                         $53,893      $38,325      $29,853      $22,594      $ 20,542
                                                    =======      =======      =======      =======      ========

Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                 $20,902      $16,113      $13,715      $13,006      $ 25,286
   Interest capitalized                               5,876        4,266        3,110          686             0
   Rental fixed charges                                 115          124          134          124           123
   Amortization of deferred financing costs           1,057        1,025        1,087        1,061         1,114
                                                    -------      -------      -------      -------      --------
      Total                                         $27,950      $21,528      $18,046      $14,877      $ 26,523
                                                    =======      =======      =======      =======      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  $  1.93      $  1.78      $  1.65      $  1.52      $   0.77
                                                    =======      =======      =======      =======      ========
</TABLE>