alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4273 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4273

 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of 
                  pharmaceutical grade phospholipids.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 1996

  Mr. Jones introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of 
                  pharmaceutical grade phospholipids.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHARMACEUTICAL GRADE PHOSPHOLIPIDS.

    Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 
1514) or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed with the 
Customs Service not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, 
of pharmaceutical grade phospholipids that--
            (1) was made under subheading 2923.20.00 of the Harmonized 
        Tariff Schedule of the United States after March 29, 1991, and 
        before January 1, 1995, and
            (2) with respect to which a lower rate of duty would have 
        applied if such entry or withdrawal had been made on January 1, 
        1995,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such lower rate of duty 
applied to such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statements of Income, Balance Sheets, and Statements of Cash Flows and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (385)
<INVENTORY>                                     18,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,396
<PP&E>                                         107,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,862
<BONDS>                                          4,240
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,254
<SALES>                                        315,925
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               315,925
<CGS>                                          267,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,653
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,833
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Scarsdale Publishing Company—The Colonial Press, Appellant, v. Peter F. Collier and Robert J. Collier, Copartners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of P. F. Collier & Son, Respondents.

Appeal from an order granting an application to vacate an *ex parte*order for the examination of one of the defendants.

Per Curiam:

Upon the papers presented the plaintiff was clearly entitled to an examination of the defendant. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Lauglilin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
TRAVIS CflwnY, TEXAS 

### 'fcRUCt EMIM Item ^iJKSffl88L«. d^A.Cai£^^k^3VdR 1KB STKTf6F TEXAS / y 

### APPELLANT" JftSE'ftfs M0T16H/ F0R LibAVE ID Fllf #n^ WITH fiRl£P Ifl .SilfPDKT \ ^ N(W> (Lanv^ 'ftrute. E^Km "3o<S*.p\\ V\imS<f$ W ftvefliw^ £ty\*ii atJi t^a4i AD *Hu& 4^ 

### 4r gtfW'.otv fl£ ^wt W*\k%tiet\tv 5^*r\ ^fecr putuan* to 1& .R, Ajjty, fV*c, ^
X 

### EH ^tveWarvsiAe^W »\Jai AfJVieA on^W \&^Aa^tTkWaan| ^G^tV^*^i^LS Tk^vteA %& twV.k^cn Ur\\;\ \tae ib^Auj a^- T*Wuary a*isr» MAR l2 2015 TL. i\ftpe\Wv\ \i<\krAawl WAtftlYike. ^>* ^Vv(*i\\*S COtoL£t>\ \»V \e\i\rioivs? ^Gf ifi?2r^Alrl) A^idWc Am$\«l \to U\dWW Wit\o ^V tao^AW&vs Nta&ws^M txWbta* ax\^» VWievJeX k^\\a»Jc ^C&uA*v& U«&«c oui\aWAav\te ©£ Ca^Co^W\Vs 

## U\W*\b Ldw^ K^AW\ ti to ^W>b\A\(\\WeWai\& ^>WW4 ^iWv^Urt SV^A^\£Ve0^vS\VeSW^N^, ni 

### TV\^b \s ^ ^e\W\ Vvtlt Xto^e^ W Olk «X\tt\b\o<\ ^ Vivwe^oVvW Wis MiV^rv 

## ^T^vStriflotvasr^^NlleU v k^AWnVWm\>Vj \tQpe& ^e CoaAfe-^ilJflSScSS Vlha
\.
Exhibit 32.3



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Pantry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter J. Sodini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/S/ PETER J. SODINIPeter J. SodiniChief Executive OfficerDate: August 30, 2005




This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or
after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-151527, 333-140233, 333-135220, 333-131324, 333-126773, 333-112417, 333-108937 and 333-147561) pertaining to the Employee and Consultant Stock Plan, the Amended and Restated 1993
Director Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and 2003 Israeli Share Option Plan of DSP Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, as well as pertaining to the
235,000 shares of the Common Stock of DSP Group, Inc. issuable pursuant to exercise of options granted pursuant to individual non-qualified stock option agreements, each granted on October 31, 2007, of our reports dated March 12, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of DSP Group Inc. and its subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of DSP Group Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.



/S/    KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER  KOST FORER GABBAY &
KASIERER  A Member of Ernst & Young Global


Tel-Aviv, Israel

March 12, 2009
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                 |  |                              
|-------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|1.   DSP Group Ltd.              |  | Israel                       
|                                 | 
|2.   Nihon DSP K.K.              |  | Japan                        
|                                 | 
|3.   RF Integrated Systems, Inc. |  | Delaware, U.S.               
|                                 | 
|4.   DSPG Edinburgh Ltd.         |  | Scotland                     
|                                 | 
|5.   DSP Video Korea Ltd.        |  | Korea                        
|                                 | 
|6.   DSP R&D Ireland Ltd.        |  | Ireland
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 158 (Thursday, August 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18843]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6307]


U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Notice of Partially Closed 
Meeting

    The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a meeting by 
conference call on Thursday, August 28, 2008, beginning at 11 a.m. 
Eastern Time. The open portion of the call should last approximately 
fifteen minutes and will address the UNESCO Associated Schools Project 
Network. Additional topic areas that relate to UNESCO may be discussed 
as needed. The Commission will accept brief oral comments from members 
of the public during the open portion of this conference call. The 
public comment period will be limited to approximately ten minutes in 
total with three minutes allowed per speaker. Members of the public who 
wish to present oral comments or listen to the conference call must 
make arrangements with the Executive Secretariat of the National 
Commission by August 26, 2008. The second portion of the teleconference 
meeting will be closed to the public to allow the Commission to discuss 
applications for the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO Laura W. Bush 
Traveling Fellowship, a fellowship funded through privately donated 
funds. This call will be closed pursuant to Section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it is 
likely to involve discussion of information of a personal nature 
regarding the relative merits of individual applicants where disclosure 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    For more information contact Alex Zemek, Executive Director of the 
U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Washington, DC 20037. Telephone: 
(202) 663-0026; Fax: (202) 663-0035; E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f2b2c3a212a3c2c202f1c1b0e1b0a41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c98d8a9c878c9a8a8689babda8bdace7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 7, 2008.
Alex Zemek,
Executive Director,U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. E8-18843 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00018-CV

BILLY JOE AKINS, DAVID AKINS, MARILYN AKINS,

AND CHAPARRAL INSULATION, INC. D/B/A

CHAPARRAL MOTORS AND LOCHRIDGE-PRIEST, INC.,

Appellants

v.

PJC LOGISTICS, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF LOCHRIDGE-PRIEST, INC.,

Appellees

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-3463-4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Billy Joe Akins, David Akins, Marilyn Akins, and Chaparral 

Insulation, Inc., and Lochridge-Priest, Inc.,, and Appellees PJC Logistics, LLC, 

Individually and Derivatively on behalf of Lochridge-Priest, Inc. filed a joint motion to 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). The parties indicate that they have 

reached a comprehensive settlement of their disputes. Dismissal of this appeal would 
Akins v. PJC Logistics, LLC Page 2

not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The 

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Scoggins, and

Judge Martha J. Trudo1

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 11, 2015

[CV06] 

 

1 The Honorable Martha J. Trudo, Judge of the 264th District Court, sitting by assignment of the Chief 

Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 74.003(a) (West 2013).
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00506-CV

NEWSTREAM ROANOKE 6.125, LLC,

Appellant

V.

JONELL SHORE, YOUNG OK KIM, AND 

SOON BOON CHANGE, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

of Denton County (22-5855-431)

August 31, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s order is

affirmed. 

It is further ordered that appellant Newstream Roanoke 6.125, LLC shall bear 

the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-4781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BEVERLY J. CRAFT, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-04-17) Submitted: March 9, 2005 Decided: April 7, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron E. Michel, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Because the sentencing guidelines relating to revocation of supervised release have always been advisory, seeU.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual Ch. 7, Pt. A, United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), does not impact the sentence imposed upon Craft. PER CURIAM: Beverly J. Craft appeals the fourteen month sentence imposed by the district court for violations of her supervised release. * Craft did not object to imposition of sentence at the revocation hearing, and thus this court’s review is for plain error. United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993). Four conditions must be met before this Court will notice plain error: (1) there must be error; (2) it must be plain under current law; (3) it must affect substantial rights, typically meaning the defendant is prejudiced by the error in that it affected the outcome of the proceedings; and (4) the error must seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Olano , 507 U.S. at 733-37. Craft claims she lacks control over her actions due to mental illness, but offers no evidence of insanity, incompetence, or an inability to understand her actions. The district court considered the relevant factors and policy statements at issue, and we conclude that the court did not plainly err in imposing the sentence. Therefore, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DORIAN DAVENPORT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 130 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 3

- 0 0 730

- C V

Style: Thomas Florence

v Zack Shelly, Zack’s Auto Sales, and Wanette Florence

Date motion filed * : January 6, 2014

Type of motion: Motion For Leave of Court to File Exhibits/ Evidence

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: January 14, 2014
CLERKOF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETHIA. BROWN BY: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA JAY KVAM, Appellant,

vs. BRIAN MINEAU; AND LEGION INVESTMENTS, LLC, Res ondents. No. 85128 

# FILED SEP 0 / 

### 2022 Laesi .TH A. BROWN RK 0 SUPREME COURT BY 

### ORDER DISMISSINGAPPEAL f)EP TY CLERK Appellant's unopposed motion for a voluntary dismissal ofthis appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge Madelyn Shipman, Settlement Judge Matuska Law Offices, Ltd. Gunderson Law Firm Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER

1 , .147
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 614

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the State of Minnesota

the New London National Fish Hatchery production facility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 1995

Mr. MINGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the

State of Minnesota the New London National Fish

Hatchery production facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NEW LONDON NATIONAL

4 FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION FACILITY.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding

6 any other provision of law and within 180 days after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the

8 Interior shall convey to the State of Minnesota without

9 reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the United

10 States in and to the property comprising the New London
2

•HR 614 IH

1 National Fish Hatchery production facility, located out2 side of downtown New London, Minnesota, including—

3 (1) all easements and water rights relating to

4 that property, and

5 (2) all land, improvements, and related personal

6 property comprising that production facility.

7 (b) USE OF PROPERTY.—All property and interests

8 conveyed under this section shall be used by the Minnesota

9 Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota fish10 ery resources management program.

11 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—All right, title, and

12 interest in and to all property and interests conveyed

13 under this section shall revert to the United States on any

14 date on which any of the property or interests are used

15 other than for the Minnesota fishery resources manage16 ment program.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of World Series of Golf, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 12, 2010/s/ Patrick BrownPatrick Brown, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to World Series of Golf, Inc. and will be retained by World Series of Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-2000
<CASH>                                          53,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,205
<INVENTORY>                                     87,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,442
<PP&E>                                         629,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 162,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 930,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          180,109
<BONDS>                                        506,974
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           182
<OTHER-SE>                                     117,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   930,341
<SALES>                                      2,432,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,432,260
<CGS>                                        1,960,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,960,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               395,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (52,329)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,722
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (10,776)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,996
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,996
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.74


</TABLE>
#### Patrick O’Day, Respondent, v. G. Frank Lapham, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to abide event. All concurred.