alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,306
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,445
<PP&E>                                           5,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,547
<BONDS>                                          8,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,783
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,727
<CGS>                                           61,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,886
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,594)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,594)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.37)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   Ran Daniel, Chief Financial Officer of Suspect Detection Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated: May 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Ran DanielName: Ran DanielTitle:  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section** **1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to**

**Section** **906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of The Pantry, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 25, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter J. Sodini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   |                                                                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/    Peter J. Sodini      |
|   | Peter J. Sodini                                                          |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer                                    |
|   |                                                                     |
|   |                                                                     |
|   | Date: December 9, 2008                                                   |

 

 

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 

PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC. 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN 
 ADOPTED JUNE 24, 1999 

AS AMENDED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2020 

Cash Compensation: 
  

					
	 •  Non-Employee Director Annual
Retainer
	  	$	185,000	 
	 •  Non-Employee Disinterested Director
Annual Retainer
	  	$	300,000	 
	 •  Non-Executive Chairman of the Board
Annual Retainer
	  	$	125,000	 
	 •  Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	$	25,000	 
	 •  Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	$	25,000	 
	 •  Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer
	  	$	25,000	 
	 •  Restructuring Committee Member Annual Retainer (excluding Disinterested
Directors)
	  	$	25,000	 
	 •  Disinterested Director Special Services Fee (e.g., for courtroom testimony,
depositions, etc.)
	  	$	7,000 per day	 

 Non-Employee Director cash compensation is payable in equal monthly installments, with
the monthly installment in respect of a given fiscal month paid on the last business day of the preceding fiscal month, provided, however, that Non-Employee Directors may elect to defer a specified
whole percentage of their cash compensation in the form of Director Deferred Stock Unit Awards under and pursuant to the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. 

Non-Employee Directors are also eligible to participate in the following: 

 

	 	•	 	 The Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Stock Purchase Plan according to its terms and provisions. 



 

	 	•	 	 The Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan according to its terms and provisions.



  

	 	•	 	 Under the Director Deferred Stock Unit Awards program set forth in the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. 2015 Stock
Incentive Plan, as amended: 


  

	 	•	 	 At the time a Non-Employee Director ceases to be a Director of the
Company, any cash compensation which has been paid for the time period following the Director’s service shall be repaid in cash to the Company. Also, the deferred stock units credited to such Director at that time shall be adjusted by the
Company to remove from the credited amount (i) any portion of the deferred stock units applicable to the time period following the Director’s service, plus (ii) provided that such Director has not repaid the Company for any cash
compensation applicable to that time period, then at the discretion of the Company, an amount of deferred stock units equal to any such cash compensation (such units to be valued as of the date the Director ceases to be a Director).



  

	 	•	 	 The amount of deferred stock units, as adjusted if applicable, will be exchanged for shares of the Company’s
common stock on a unit-to-share basis, provided, however, that the deferred stock units (valued as of the date the Director ceases to be a Director) will be paid in cash
to the extent that applicable plan limitations at such time preclude plan distributions of Pier 1 Imports, Inc. common stock.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 13, 

2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________ 

NO. 14-12-00154-CV

____________

GALP SIERRA VISTA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and AMERICAN 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Appellants

V.

PENNY HERRING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 295th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-70290

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 13, 2012. On March 7, 2012, 

appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is 

granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and Jamison.
#### Ex Parte Richard Baxter Cherry, Jr.

No. 25171.

December 20, 1950.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is an extradition case.

Upon the requisition of the Governor of the State of Georgia, the Governor of this state issued his executive warrant which, upon its face, shows that the appellant stands charged by “accusation” in the State of Georgia.

The requisition of the Governor of the State of Georgia upon which the Governor of this state relied and acted is not before us. The record does not reflect, therefore, the nature of the “accusation” against the appellant in the demanding state, whether by indictment, affidavit, or information.

It is now deemed axiomatic that a requisition may issue only *325when the accused stands charged in the demanding state by indictment, affidavit, or complaint. A requisition cannot rest upon a charge by information. Ex Parte Bourland, 132 Tex. Cr. R. 434, 105 S. W. 2d 251.

The term, “accusation,” is defined by statute of this state as “.....a charge made in a lawful manner against any person that he has been guilty of some offense which subjects him to prosecution in the name of the state. One is said to be ‘accused’ of an offense from the time that any ‘criminal action’ shall have been commenced against him.” Art. 343, P. C.

There being nothing showing to the contrary, it will be presumed that the laws of the State of Georgia defining the term, “accusation,” are the same as those of this state. It is apparent, therefore, that the term, “accusation,” includes a charge by information.

The warrant of the Governor of this state, in fact the record in its entirety, not affirmatively reflecting that the appellant is charged in the demanding state by indictment or affidavit, we are constrained to conclude that the warrant of extradition is insufficient and that appellant should be discharged from custody or restraint thereunder.

It follows that the order of the judge of the criminal district court of Dallas County, remanding appellant to the custody of the arresting officers is reversed, and appellant is ordered discharged from custody.

Opinion approved by the court.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE STATE OF:

JANE BISHOP MOORE, DECEASED, 

 

 Appellant.

 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00298-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law

of Reeves County, Texas 

(TC# 2590P)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the County Clerk’s request for an extension of time within which to 

file the Clerk’s Record until March 18, 2015. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE THE CLERK’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Dianne O. Florez, County Clerk, for Reeves County, Texas 

prepare the Clerk’s Record, and forward the same to this Court on or before March 18, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5

th day of March, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### TENSAS DELTA LAND CO. et al. v. WHATLEY et al.

No. 5198.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 2, 1936.

*154Hudson,. Potts & Bernstein, of Monroe, for appellants.

A. D. Flowers, of Jena, for appellees. •

DREW, Judge.

This suit is brought under Act No. 38 of 1908 claiming title to the northeast 1⁄8 of northeast 1⁄2, section 36, township 11 north, range 8 east, Louisiana principal meridian located in the parish of Catahoula.

Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, alleging they were in'possession of said property as owners, and that their possession was physical, continuous, open, and notorious, and therefore the suit could not he brought under Act No. 38 of 1908, which act provides for suits to be brought under it only when neither party is in possession of the property claimed.

The motion was fixed for trial, and after evidence of possession was heard, the lower court in a written opinion overruled the motion and discussed to some extent the testimony adduced on trial of the motion. The case was then put at issue and trial had on the merits. Judgment was rendered rejecting the demands of both plaintiffs and defendants.

The case was appealed to this court, and here we find both plaintiffs and defendants complaining of the judgment rendered below. Defendants complain of the ruling on the motion to dismiss, and plaintiffs of the judgment on the merits.

The greater part of the briefs of both plaintiffs and defendants concerns the motion to dismiss. The evidence is discussed more or less fully in the briefs; however, the record fails to contain the testimony taken .on the motion. It is not shown or intimated that either plaintiffs or defendants are at fault in that respect.

The question raised in the motion is a serious onej and we are unable to pass upon it without reviewing the testimony taken on trial thereof; and since neither plaintiffs nor defendants are satisfied with the judgment rendered below, we feel justified, in the interest of justice, in remanding the case to the lower court in order that the record may be completed: Brown v. Gulf Refining Co., 5 La.App. 546; Bordages & Tierney v. Staggers, 3 La.App. 343; Remedial Loan Society v. Gardeur, 1 La.App. 287; Harris v. Signor Tie Co., 10 La.App. 169, 120 So. 663; Parker v. Summers, 9 La.App. 585, 121 So. 357; Banahan v. Hughes, 156 La. 938, 101 So. 272.

It is therefore ordered that this case be remanded to the lower court for the completion of the record.
<PAGE>









                            INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
33-91368 of RTW, Inc. on form S-8/S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-91372 of 
RTW, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-98966 of RTW, Inc. on 
Form S-8, and Registration Statement No.  333-28585 of RTW, Inc. on Form S-8 
of our reports dated February 1, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K of RTW, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 29, 1999
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 27, 2015

No. 04-15-00251-CV

IN RE HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On May 20, 2015, newly retained appellate counsel for real party in interest Patricia Rani 

Spaulding filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file a response to the petition for 

writ of mandamus. The motion is GRANTED. A response on behalf of the real party in interest 

is due in this court no later than June 19, 2015.

It is so ORDERED on May 27, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2013-CI-08676, styled Patricia Rani Spaulding v. HEB, Inc., HEB 

Grocery Company, LP; HEBCO GP, LLC and HEBCO Partners, Ltd., pending in the 285th Judicial District Court, 

Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.
Exhibit 31.1a  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Brandi Iannelli, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A1 of TJS Wood Flooring, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: July 20, 2007  /s/ Brandi Iannelli Brandi Iannelli Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Levcor
         International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended
         September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
         on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward F. Cooke, Chief Financial
         Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: November 14, 2003

By: /s/ EDWARD F. COOKE
    -----------------------
    Edward F. Cooke
    Chief Financial Officer


                                     Page 31
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies
that the Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended September 30,
2007, accompanying this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:
      May 12, 2008
                
                /s/ Allan
      P. MerrillAllan
      P. MerrillExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Title 18,
United States Code, and is not being filed as part of the report or as a
separate disclosure document.
#### Jason G. Atwater and J. Dwight Atwater, Respondents, v. John W. Calhoun, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.