alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Jeremy Goodwin, Chief Financial Officer of CHINA ADVANCED
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:





1. 
    The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. 
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 11th
day of November, 2011.





/s/
      Jeremy GoodwinJeremy
      GoodwinChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and will be retained by China
Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Exhibit 99.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the annual report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, as
filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mary M. Ebele, Principal Financial Officer of CAI Equipment
Leasing IV Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.


By:    /s/Mary M. Ebele                                  Dated: March 30, 2004
       ----------------
       Mary M. Ebele
Title: Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.8.4

   DESCRIPTION OF THE REINSURANCE AGREEMENT FOR 2005 BETWEEN ACIC AND GENERAL
               REINSURANCE CORPORATION EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2005

The Company, on behalf of American Compensation Insurance Company (ACIC), its
wholly owned subsidiary, entered into reinsurance contracts for the fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2005. The following summarizes the significant terms of
these reinsurance agreements.

LIABILITY OF THE REINSURER

The Reinsurers shall pay to ACIC, with respect to Workers' Compensation and
Employers' Liability Business, the amount of Net Loss for each Occurrence, as
defined in the contracts, in excess of ACIC's retention, but not exceeding the
Limits of Liability of the Reinsurer as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LOSS LAYER                          REINSURER                                 COMMENT
<S>                                 <C>                                       <C>
$4,000,000 excess $1,000,000        General Reinsurance Corporation           Non Minnesota losses

$5,000,000 excess $5,000,000        General Reinsurance Corporation           Non Minnesota losses

$10,000,000 excess $10,000,000      General Reinsurance Corporation           Non Minnesota losses.
                                                                              Net loss for any
                                                                              one employee shall
                                                                              not exceed
                                                                              $10,000,000

Excess of $20,000,000                                                         100% retained by ACIC
                                                                              Non Minnesota losses
</TABLE>

COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION

The agreements shall apply to new and renewal policies of ACIC becoming
effective at and after 12:01 A.M., January 1, 2005, and to policies in force at
12:01 A.M., January 1, 2005, with respect to losses resulting from occurrences
taking place at or after the aforesaid time and date.

Parties may terminate these agreements at any December 31st by sending to the
other, by registered mail to its principal office, not less than 90 days prior
written notice. The Reinsurer may also terminate the agreements in the event of
significant adverse events at ACIC or in the event of a change in control of
ACIC or RTW, Inc.

REINSURANCE PREMIUM

ACIC agreed to pay the reinsurers based on premiums earned for each Loss layer
as shown above. These rates are similar to the rates that we paid in 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   219
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       367,684
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       219
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               358,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (300,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (301,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (301,586)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      68,606,000
<SECURITIES>                                   143,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,733,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,156,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,669,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           128,579,000
<PP&E>                                      80,423,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,586,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             190,130,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,584,000
<BONDS>                                     88,320,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       287,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  68,091,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               190,130,000
<SALES>                                    108,102,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           118,549,000
<CGS>                                       21,331,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,331,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           103,202,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,591,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,880,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   859,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,920,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,920,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
        

</TABLE>
#### Warren F. Hayes v. Elmer Apperson.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-59]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the  requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.  The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of  Representatives, Transmittals 08-59 with attached transmittal, policy  justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 5, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 47898)          ( print page 47899)          ( print page 47900)          ( print page 47901)          ( print page 47902)          ( print page 47903)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-18640 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-30558

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Keyon Pullins, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:21-CR-40-1

______________________________

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Keyon Pullins

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pullins has filed a response. The record is not 

sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Pullins’s claim

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 9, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-30558 Document: 00516670765 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2023
No. 22-30558

2

sounding in ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider 

the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 

739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Pullins’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-30558 Document: 00516670765 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2023
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

** **

Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of StoneTan China Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2008 of the Company fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| November 7, 2008 | /s/ Richard Tan |
|-----------------------|----------------------|
|                  |                 | Name:  Richard  Tan |
|                  |                 | Title: | Chief Executive Officer, President and   Director (Principal Executive and   Principal Financial Officer) |

 

1

----
#### Samuel Levenson, Respondent, *v.*George F. Johnson, Appellant.

Second Department,

November 27, 1908.

Judgment — determination of issues in summary proceeding — res adjudicata.

Where in a summary proceeding the issue that the tenant was entitled to a reduction in rent for services rendered was decided against him, the matter is *res acljudicaia,*and he cannot thereafter maintain an action for the value of the services.

Appeal by the defendant, George F. Johnson, from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, in favor of the plaintiff, rendered on the 3d day of February, 1908.

*P. J.*Leahon, for the appellant.

*Daniel T.*O'Brien, for the respondent.

Miller, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action for services which plaintiff says were rendered while he was a tenant of the defendant, pursuant to an agreement with the defendant’s agent that the value of said services should be applied on the monthly rentals. It is undisputed that the defendant, through an agent, brought a dispossess proceeding against the plaintiff, alleging non-payment of rent; that, in that proceeding, the plaintiff alleged the rendition of said services and the agreement to apply the value thereof in payment of the rent; that the said issue was litigated and decided against the tenant; and that a final order *31was made, directing the issuance of a warrant to remove the plaintiff for non-payment of rent.

The defendant should have prevailed in this suit on the plea of the adjudication in the dispossess proceedings. The question at issue in this suit was directly involved in that proceeding; it was litigated and decided in favor of the defendant. If the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff for services rendered, the plaintiff was entitled to offset it against the. rent, irrespective of any specific agreement to that effect. It needs no citation of authority to support the proposition that an issue, once litigated between the parties, is finally settled by the judgment so long as it remains unreversed.

The judgment must be reversed.

Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event.
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350     I, Tony N. Frudakis, President and Treasurer of Skyview Holdings Corp. (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:  1.  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.   Skyview Holdings Corp.Date: April 1, 2011By:/s/ Tony N. FrudakisTony N. FrudakisPresident and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### William J. Barr, as Trustee, v. Eva Sofranski and Another.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### POLAND v. HOLDEN.

No. 14555.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 15, 1934.

Charles J. Mundy, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Claude W. Duke, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

JANVIER, Judge.

Napoleon Poland, formerly employed as a chauffeur by defendant, Harry Holden, alleges that he was discharged without cause, and that, at the time of the discharge, there was due him wages for one week amounting to $18, and that this amount has never been paid to him.

He avers that he is entitled not only to the said sum, but also to further payments at the rate of $18 per week for each week which has elapsed since his discharge. He bases this contention on Act No. 150 of 1920, under which it is provided that any employer who shall fail to pay a discharged employee within twenty-four hours after the discharge of the employee shall be liable for full wages from the time the employee makes demand until payment is made in full.

Plaintiff alleges that he was discharged at the “end of the second week in July, 1931,” and he claims that at the time the suit was filed there was due him $504. It is evident that, if plaintiff’s claim is sustained, there will now be due him considerably more than $2,000.

Defendant maintains that Poland was paid in full when he was discharged.

In the district court there was judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit, and he has appealed.

It is shown that defendant employs many persons in his home and in his business, and no reason is given to us which induces the belief that he would single out this and one other employee, who testified in favor of this one, and refuse to pay only these two the small amount which they claim was not paid them when they were discharged.

There is nothing whatever in the record which would justify a holding that the judge a quo has erred in disbelieving plaintiff’s most improbable tale.

Counsel for plaintiff has cited a few cases in which judgments have been rendered in favor of domestic servants for unpaid wages, but we fail to see what effect those citations can have here. In those cases the plaintiffs had not been paid, and here the contrary is true. Nor do we see the application here of the biblical quotations in the addenda to plaintiff’s brief. Counsel points put that in Leviticus, chapter 19, verse 13, we are told that: “The- wages of him that is hired shalt not abide with thee all night until the morning.”

Counsel also directs our attention to the twenty-fourth chapter of Deuteronomy, verses 14 and 15:

> “Thou shalt not oppress an hired servant that is poor and needy, whether he be of thy brethren, or of the strangers that are in the land within thy gates.

> “At his day thou shalt give him his hire, neither shall the sun go down upon it; for he is poor, and setteth his heart upon it; lest he cry against thee unto the Lord, and it be sin unto thee.”

In any case in which the servant is oppressed we shall do our utmost to assist in relieving the distress, but this is not such a case.

We believe that the finding of the court below was correct, and it is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be, and it is, affirmed.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
OF MANAGING DIRECTOR


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Alan
Schaffner, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the nine months ended September 20, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.








/s/
Alan Schaffner


Alan
Schaffner, Managing Director


Dated:
November 20, 2009
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

d0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

137456(34)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137456 COA: 285167 Muskegon CC: 06-054169-FH CECIL RAYMOND HAWKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s June 23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WABCO Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ulrich Michel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

Dated: May 5, 2010