alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1

                            ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO
                        AMENDED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                    RTW, INC.

         The undersigned, an officer of RTW, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the
"corporation"), hereby certifies that:

         1.       The name of the corporation is RTW, Inc.; and

         2.       Pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota
                  Statutes Sections 302A.131 and 302A.402, Subd. 3, the Board of
                  Directors of the corporation duly authorized and approved the
                  following amendment to the corporation's Articles of
                  Incorporation on November 7, 2002:

         RESOLVED, that Article III of the corporation's Amended Articles of
Incorporation shall be amended to state, in its entirety, as follows:

                              ARTICLE III - CAPITAL

         The aggregate number of shares that the corporation has authority to
issue shall be 17,500,000 shares, which shall have a par value of $.01 per share
solely for the purpose of any statute or regulation imposing a tax or fee based
upon the capitalization of the corporation, and which shall consist of
12,500,000 common shares and 5,000,000 undesignated shares. The Board of
Directors of the corporation is authorized to establish from the undesignated
shares, by resolution adopted and filed in the manner provided by law, one or
more classes or series of shares, to designate each class or series (which may
include but is not limited to designation as additional common shares), and to
fix the relative powers, qualifications, restrictions, rights and preferences of
each such class or series, including, without limitation, the right to create
voting, dividend and liquidation rights and preferences greater than those of
common stock.

         Except as expressly amended by the provisions hereof, the terms and
provisions contained in the Articles of Incorporation and any previous
amendments thereto shall continue in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand this 7th
day of November, 2002.

                                         RTW, Inc.

                                         By /s/ J. Alexander Fjelstad
                                            -----------------------------
                                            Its      CEO
                                            -----------------------------
18537.

#### Brown *v.*Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.

Argued April 13, *1954*

Decided May 11, 1954.

*Joseph J. Gaines,*for plaintiff in error.

*Moise, Post & Gardner, William H. Davidson, Jr.,*contra.

Sutton, Justice.

*This*case is a companion to *Brown*v. *Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.*(No. 18536), ante. The facts in that case are substantially the same as those in this case, and the legal questions raised by the writ of error here are identical with those presented and decided in that case. The ruling there made, therefore, controls the issues here, and requires a judgment of reversal with the same direction as given in case number 18536.

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 574 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 574

   To provide for the operation of laboratories to carry out certain 
 public-health functions for the region along the international border 
                              with Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1995

 Mr. Coleman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the operation of laboratories to carry out certain 
 public-health functions for the region along the international border 
                              with Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southwest Public Health Laboratory 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PUBLIC-HEALTH LABORATORIES FOR SOUTHWESTERN BORDER REGION.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting as appropriate 
through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
or through other agencies, may make grants to States for the operation 
of laboratories to protect the public health through analyzing human, 
wildlife, air, water, and soil samples. The purposes for which the 
Secretary may authorize such a grant to be expended include the 
establishment of the laboratories, increasing the capacity of existing 
facilities, and collecting the samples to be analyzed by the 
laboratories. The Secretary may make such a grant only if the State 
involved agrees that the laboratory will be operated by the State, and 
will serve the region along the international border between the United 
States and Mexico (in the States of California, Arizona, New Mexico, 
and Texas). The Secretary shall ensure that such a laboratory is 
established in an urban area that is centrally located in such region, 
that the laboratory is located within 25 miles of such border, and that 
the laboratory receives the principal amount of assistance under this 
section.
                                 <all>
```
#### William J. Carroll, Respondent, v. The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion denied. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, J J.
#### Demetrius Triantiphyllides and John Carneri, Copartners, Trading and Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Trianta & Carneri, Respondents, v. Adrian H. Joline and Douglas Robinson, as Receivers of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs , and disbursements. No opinion.
Exhibit 7.1 - Calculation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charge

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       2002           2001           2000
                                                     --------       --------       --------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>             <C>
Ratio in accordance with Portuguese GAAP
      Excluding interest on deposits                     2.87           3.76           2.09
      Including interest on deposits                     1.48           1.38           1.22

Estimated ratios in accordance with US GAAP
      Excluding Interest on deposits                     2.41           2.89           2.10
      Including interest on deposits                     1.36           1.26           1.22

Calculation of earnings

Portuguese GAAP:
      Income before taxation                          253,024        239,037         80,477
( + ) Minority interests                               34,290         36,289         30,168
                                                     --------       --------       --------
Earnings                                              287,314        275,326        110,645

Earnings before fixed charges and rent expense:
      Excluding interest on deposits                  441,034        375,077        212,105
      Including interest on deposits                  885,187        991,838        621,947

US GAAP:
      Net income                                      168,582        129,609         58,982
      Income tax expense                               47,453         38,199         16,900
      Deferred income taxes                           (34,009)       (15,427)         5,187
                                                     --------       --------       --------
      Income before taxation                          182,026        152,381         81,069
( + ) Minority interests                               34,290         36,289         30,168
                                                     --------       --------       --------
Earnings                                              216,316        188,670        111,237

Earnings before fixed charges:
      Excluding interest on deposits                  370,754        288,421        212,697
      Including interest on deposits                  814,907        905,182        622,539

Fixed charges including 1/3 rent expense:
      Excluding Interest on deposits                  153,720         99,751        101,460
      Including interest on deposits                  597,873        716,512        511,302

Fixed charges:
      Excluding Interest on deposits                  148,003         93,025         96,820
      Total interest expenses                         592,156        709,786        506,662

1/3 Rent expense                                        5,717          6,726          4,640
</TABLE>


                                      197
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Group Realty Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A. Patterson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey A. Patterson

 

 

Jeffrey A. Patterson

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 19, 2007
EX-10.32





 Exhibit 10.32 
 



 
 801 Corey SL • Scranton, PA 18505 

Phone: (570) 558-8000 

August 2, 2013 
 Managing Member 

North Keyser Partners, LLC 
 801 East Corey Street 

Moosic, Pennsylvania 18507 

Re:    Lease Extension – 888 North Keyser Ave. 

Dear Sirs: 
 By way of this letter, Vycom Corp.,
lessee of the property located at 888 North Keyser Ave., Scranton, PA. (the “Property”), hereby provides notice of its intention to extend the lease term on the Property for an additional four (4) years pursuant to Section 1.3 of
the Amended and Restated Industrial Lease between North Keyser Partners, LLC and Vycom Corp. dated May 10, 2005 (the “Lease”). Accordingly, the Extended Term shall be from May 11, 2013 through May 10, 2017. Lessor hereby
waives Lessor’s failure in this instance to have provided one hundred and eighty (180) days’ notice of intent to extend the lease term as required under Section 1.3(b) of the Lease. However, such notice shall still be required in
the future to extend the lease beyond May 2017. 
 Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning one copy of
this notice to the undersigned. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CPG International Inc.


 
			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian Cooper


 
			
	Name:	 	Brian Cooper
	Title:	 	General Counsel


  

			
	Accepted and agreed as of the date first written above:


			
		
	By:	 	/s/ James G. Andersen


			
	Name:	 	James G. Andersen
	Title:	 	Member
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 709

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to require States

to have laws that would permit a parent who is chronically ill or near

death to name a standby guardian for a minor child without surrendering

parental rights.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1995

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. STUDDS, Mr. SCHUMER,

Mr. EVANS, Mr. MILLER of California, and Mr. DEUTSCH) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and

Means

A BILL

To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act

to require States to have laws that would permit a parent

who is chronically ill or near death to name a standby

guardian for a minor child without surrendering parental

rights.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Standby Guardianship

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 709 IH

1 SEC. 2. STATES REQUIRED TO HAVE STANDBY GUARDIAN2 SHIP LAW AS A CONDITION OF ELIGIBILITY

3 FOR FEDERAL FUNDS FOR FOSTER CARE

4 AND ADOPTION ASSISTANCE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part E of title IV of the Social

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 670–679) is amended by inserting

7 after section 477 the following:

8 ‘‘SEC. 478. STANDBY GUARDIANSHIP LAWS AND PROCE9 DURES.

10 ‘‘To be eligible for payments under this part, a State

11 must have in effect laws and procedures that permit any

12 parent who is chronically ill or near death, without surren13 dering parental rights, to designate a standby guardian

14 for the parent’s minor children, whose authority would

15 take effect upon—

16 ‘‘(1) the death of the parent;

17 ‘‘(2) the mental incapacity of the parent; or

18 ‘‘(3) the physical debilitation and consent of the

19 parent.’’.

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

21 subsection (a) shall take effect at the end of the first cal22 endar quarter that begins 60 or more months after the

23 date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to pay24 ments under part E of title IV of the Social Security Act
3

•HR 709 IH

1 for the quarter and payments made under such part for

2 any succeeding quarter.

Æ
#### L. J. Taylor v. State

No. 25368.

October 10, 1951.

Rehearing Denied November 14, 1951.

*453Hon. C. L. McIver, Judge Presiding.

*Bennett & Bennett,*by *Mac L. Bennett, Jr.*of Counsel, Normangee, for appellant.

*Georffe P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORRISON, Judge.

On the original submission we reversed the conviction and ordered the prosecution dismissed because we thought we had detected a fatal defect in the information. This was based upon the absence of an allegation therein that the clerk of the district court of Leon County had published the judgment of said court in prohibition election contest case which determined the dry status of the area involved.

This holding was predicated upon numerous authorities holding the act of publication by the commissioners’ court of the results of a prohibition election to be a requisite allegation in an information charging liquor law violations.

Our attention is now called to Bickers v. Lacy, (Texas Civ. App.) 134 S.W. 763, and Brooks v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 526, 137 S.W. (2d) 768, both of which hold that the judgment of a district court in a prohibition election contest is itself notice to the world, and further call attention to the fact that there is no statutory requirement that the same be published.

Finding ourselves in error in the original opinion the same is now withdrawn. The state’s motion for rehearing is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

ON appellant's motion for rehearing

*454GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant contends that the case of Adams v. State, 241 S.W. (2d) 150, is here controlling and that his cause should be reversed because the trial court certifies in the bills of exception herein that such court was in error.

In the Adams case, we find laid down the proposition that although there may be a certification of error by the trial court in a bill of exception, nevertheless, such being a mere conclusion upon the part of the trial court, this court will look to the whole record, and if therein be found a contradiction of such certification, such could be utilized in a disposition of the matter.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert F. McCullough, Jr., certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CytoCore, Inc.;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.         /s/ Robert F. McCullough, Jr.   Robert F. McCullough, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Report of
      Acquired Sales Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
      period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the “Report”) I, Gerard M. Jacobs, Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
      knowledge:





a.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and





b.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Gerard M.
      Jacobs


Gerard
      M.
      Jacobs, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 619 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 619

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
                                 wage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 20, 1995

   Mr. Sabo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
                                 wage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Minimum Wage Amendments of 1995''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MINIMUM WAGE.

    Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
206(a)(1)) is amended by striking out ``and not less than $4.25 an hour 
after March 31, 1991'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``not less than 
$4.25 an hour until the 90th day after the date of enactment of the 
Minimum Wage Amendments of 1995, and not less than $6.50 an hour after 
the 90th day after such date''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 21

- 00382

- CR
IN RE Jaime FLORES , Relato r Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice Delivered and Filed: September 22, 2021
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION In his petition for writ of mandamus, relator asks this court to direct the trial court to withdraw relator’s allegedly un knowing, unintelligent, and involuntary 2007 plea of guilty

. Intermediate courts of appeals have limited writ jurisdiction in criminal matters. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, however, has jurisdiction in final post

conviction habeas corpus proceedings. See T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC

. art s
. 4.04, 11.07; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (by granting writ of mandamus to vacate judgment of con viction, court of appeals usurped exclusive authority of Court of Criminal Appeals to grant post

- conviction relief). If an applicant finds it necessary to complain about an action or inaction of the convicting court, the applicant may seek

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006

- CR

- 6091 , styled The State of Texas v. Jaime Flores

.04

- 21

- 00382

- CR

- 2

- relief from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). This court lacks jurisdiction over relator’s complaints regarding his 20 07 conviction. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for wan t of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-91368 of RTW, Inc. on form S-8/S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-91372 of
RTW, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-98966 of RTW, Inc. on Form
S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-28585 of RTW, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
reports dated January 23, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of RTW, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 25, 2004