alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              89
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,476)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,767
<PP&E>                                         707,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                (85,482)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 942,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,964
<BONDS>                                        506,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     297,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   942,225
<SALES>                                        230,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,639
<CGS>                                           82,637
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                59,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,046)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,046)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Brandi Iannelli, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A1 of TJS Wood Flooring, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;    5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: January 3, 2008    /s/ Brandi Iannelli Brandi Iannelli Title: President and Chief Financial Officer  2
Exhibit 24.1
FIRST FORTIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned directors and officers of First Fortis Life Insurance Company, a New Yorkcorporation, hereby constitute and appoint Lance R. Wilson, Ranell M. Jacobson, Katherine Greenzangand Douglas R. Lowe, and each of them, the individual’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact andagents, in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Reporton Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, to be filed by First Fortis Life InsuranceCompany, or any amendment to such report, and all other documents in connection therewith, and tofile the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting to said attorneys-in-fact andagents, and each of them full power and authority, as fully to all intents and purposes as he orshe might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact asagents or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.   Signature Title                 /s/ Lance R. WilsonLance R. Wilson President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairmanof the Board (Principal Executive Officer)                 /s/ Terry J. KryshakTerry J. Kryshak Sr. Vice President and Director                 /s/ Ranell M. JacobsonRanell M. Jacobson Treasurer and Director(Principal Financial Officer)                 /s/ Barbara R. HegeBarbara R. Hege Assistant Treasurer and Director                 /s/ Lesley G. SilvesterLesley G. Silvester Director
 

 

First Fortis Life Insurance Company
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 96-41086

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

ROBERT W. SCHMALZRIED,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(6:95-CV-749)

_________________________ August 14, 1997

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Schmalzried appeals the denial of his motion to vacate,

set aside, or correct his s entence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Construing his notice of appeal as an application for a certificate

of appealability (“COA”), in accordance with the provisions of the

Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”),1 See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 22(b) (providing that a noti ce of appeal shall be

construed as a motion for COA if no express request is filed); see also Orozco

, 103 F.3d at 392.

2 See Lucas v. Johnson , 101 F.3d 1045, 1046 (5th Cir. 1996).

2 Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1217-18 (1996), we stayed the

briefing schedule pending the disposition of this COA application.

We now order the briefing schedule to be implemented.

The AEDPA amended 28 U.S.C. § 2253 to require the issuance of

a COA as a prerequisite to appealing the denial of a § 2255 motion.

In United States v. Orozco , 103 F.3d 389 (5th Cir. 1996), we held

that the COA requirement applies to § 2255 petitions in which the

notice of appeal was filed on or after the effective date of the

AEDPA, April 24, 1996. Id . at 390-92.

Schmalzried filed his noti ce of appeal on October 28, 1996.

Therefore, we construed the notice of appeal as a request for a

COA 1 and stayed briefing pending the disposition of this

application. 2 The intervening decision in L indh v. Murphy

,

117 S. Ct. 2059 (1997), however, eliminates the need to issue a COA

in the instant case. In L indh

, the Court concluded that th e

ame ndments to chapter 153 of title 28 apply only to cases filed

after the eff ective date of the AEDPA. I d

. at 4561. Insofar as

the COA requirement, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), falls within chapter 153

of title 28, Lindh has overruled Orozco

. Hence, the COA

requ irement applies only to § 2255 petitions filed after the

effective date of the AEDPA. United States v. Carter , 117 F.3d

262, 264 (5th Cir. 1997).3

Schmalzried fi led his § 2255 petition on October 13, 1995.

Therefore, a COA is not needed to vest jurisdiction in this court.

Accordingly, we order that a briefing notice shall issue forthwith,

instructing the United States to respond to Schmalzried's brief,

and the appeal shall be submitted for consideration and action in

accordance with the usual procedures.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18682]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m. (Eastern Time), August 18, 2008.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the July 21, 2008 Board member meeting
2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director
a. Monthly Participant Activity Report
b. Legislative Report
c. Investment Performance Report
3. Report on Potential Risk of Loss to TSP Assets as a result of the 
Theoretical Insolvency of Barclays Global Investors

Parts Closed to the Public

4. Procurement

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: August 8, 2008.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
 [FR Doc. E8-18682 Filed 8-8-08; 12:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-21-00131-CV 

 

GINGER LIGHT AND JAMES JUSTIN LIGHT, APPELLANTS 

V. 

MIKE THOMA, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the 99th District Court 

 Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2021-543,251, Honorable J. Phillip Hays, Presiding 

June 30, 2021 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

1

 

Appellants Ginger Light and James Justin Light filed a notice of appeal from the 

trial court’s “Agreed Judgment in Garnishment” without paying the requisite filing fee. By 

letter of June 8, 2021, the clerk of this court notified appellants that the filing fee was 

overdue and that unless they were excused from paying court costs under Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 20.1, failure to pay the filing fee by June 18 would result in dismissal 

1 Justice Lawrence M. Doss, not participating.
of the appeal. To date, appellants have not paid the filing fee or sought leave to proceed 

without payment of court costs.

Because appellants have failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules 

and a notice from the clerk requiring action within a specified time, we dismiss the appeal. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b), 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CROWN
NORTHCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         735,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,702,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,683,529
<PP&E>                                       2,806,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                 791,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,420,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,143,011
<BONDS>                                      2,563,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,310
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,220,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,420,613
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,540,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,247,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,526,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (16,161)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             344,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (561,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (217,170)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (344,589)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (344,589)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 3 4 9 P A 1 6

Filed 3 November 2017

KB AIRCRAFT ACQUISITION, LLC

v. JACK M. BERRY, JR. and 585 GOFORTH ROAD, LLC

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 31 of a unanimous decision

of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 90 S.E.2d 559 (201 6 ), affirming a n order
of summary judgment entered on 6 February 201 5 b y Judge Richard L. Doughton in
Superior Court, Watauga County

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 9 October 2017

.

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, L.L.P., by Byron L. Saintsing

, for plaintiff

- appell ant

. Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Clint S. Morse and John H. Small
, for defendant

- appell ees

.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00471-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. C-2-W011598-0842389-D

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Wallach, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

Ex parte Franklin Robert Elkins
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Franklin Robert Elkins attempts to appeal from the trial court’s order 

recommending that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals deny his pro se Article 11.07

application for writ of habeas corpus seeking postconviction relief from his May 26, 

2004 conviction for intoxication manslaughter. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.

11.07.

This court has no jurisdiction over postconviction applications for writs of 

habeas corpus in felony cases. See id. art. 11.07, § 3; Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel.

Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) 

(orig. proceeding) (stating that “[j]urisdiction to grant post conviction habeas corpus 

relief on a final felony conviction rests exclusively with” the Court of Criminal 

Appeals). Accordingly, by letter dated December 18, 2019, we notified Elkins of our 

concern that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and warned him that we 

could dismiss it for that reason unless we received a response showing grounds for 

continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Elkins filed a response, but it does not show 

grounds for continuing this appeal.1 We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: January 30, 2020

1

In his response to our jurisdiction letter, Elkins requested that we appoint 

counsel to assist him with filing his brief. We deny his request as moot.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3, No. 333-13363, Form S-3, No. 333-03205, Form S-8, No. 333-81863, and
Form S-8, No. 333-81865) of The Mills Corporation and in the related
Prospectuses of our report dated February 22, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Mills Corporation included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 27, 2000
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles R. Howell IV,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |     |  |                         
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: April 29, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles R. Howell IV
|                      |  |     |  | Charles R. Howell IV    
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STANLEY PRICE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-13081

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

vs.

MICHIGAN STATE TREASURER,

 

Defendant.

______________________________/

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MORGAN’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DATED DECEMBER 14, 2010,

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [D.E. 17] AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [D.E. 16]

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 14, 2010 (“R and R”). The R and R recommends that the

Court deny Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion and grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. No

objections were filed thereto.

This Court had an opportunity to fully review this matter and believes that the Magistrate

Judge has reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. As the R and R explains,

Plaintiff does not offer any arguments in support of his motion for dispositive relief. In addition,

Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine which, the Sixth Circuit has held,

precludes challenges, such as Plaintiff’s, by prisoners to state court judgments authorizing asset

seizure under Michigan’s State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act (“SCFRA”), M.C.L.

800.401 et seq., Abbott v. Michigan, 474 F.2d 324, 332 (6th Cir. 2007). As Plaintiff’s alleged

injuries arise as a direct result of a state-court judgment authorizing the seizure of his pension,

2:09-cv-13081-BAF-VMM Doc # 22 Filed 01/05/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 107
2

Plaintiff’s claims may not proceed, and his complaint must be dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 14, 2010, is hereby accepted and adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

Dated: January 5, 2011 S/Bernard A. Friedman_____

Detroit, Michigan BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document 

was served upon counsel of record by electronic and/or first-class mail.

S/Carol Mullins 

Case Manager to Judge Friedman

2:09-cv-13081-BAF-VMM Doc # 22 Filed 01/05/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 108
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 644

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to include

additional counties in the State of Mississippi as part of the Appalachian

region.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of

1965 to include additional counties in the State of Mississippi as part of the Appalachian region.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF ADDITIONAL COUNTIES IN

4 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AS PART OF APPA5 LACHIAN REGION.

6 The 5th undesignated paragraph of section 403 of

7 the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40

8 U.S.C. App. 403) is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘Carroll,’’ after ‘‘Calhoun,’’;
2

HR 644 IH

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘Grenada,’’ after ‘‘Clay,’’; and

2 (3) by inserting ‘‘Montgomery,’’ after ‘‘Mon3 roe,’’.

Æ