alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Samsonite Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcello Bottoli, as Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|/s/MARCELLO BOTTOLI |  |                                            
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Name:               |  | Marcello Bottoli                           
|Title:              |  | Co-President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | April 8, 2004                              

A
signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael Rideman, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Rideman

Michael RidemanCEODated: May 21, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc.and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Order entered August 27, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00521-CR

No. 05-13-00522-CR

No. 05-13-00523-CR

DAVID CHUMBLEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-51536-I, F11-51537-I, F11-00261-I

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Auditors

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-33938,
No. 333-43196, No. 333-44128, and No. 333-58916) and on Form S-8 (No. 33-76324,
No. 333-09135, No. 333-57141, No. 333-40940 and No. 333-65084) of NMS Communications Corporation (formerly, Natural
MicroSystems Corporation) of our report dated March 1, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 1, 2004

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday August 20, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Staff Assistant.
[FR Doc. E8-18335 Filed 8-5-08; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
EX-10.18




 Exhibit 10.18 

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
 TO
THE 
 HENRY SCHEIN, INC. 

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014 

WHEREAS, Henry Schein, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Henry Schein, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended
and restated effective as of January 1, 2014 (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 of the Plan, the
Board of Directors of the Company or an authorized committee may amend the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee is authorized
to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee wishes to amend the definition of “Disability” to explicitly
reference that the determination will be made by the Social Security Administration or under the Company’s long-term disability plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 

 

	1.	 Section l (o) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



 ‘“Disabled’ means that a person has been determined to be disabled by the Social Security
Administration or is receiving income replacement benefits for full disability under the Company’s long-term disability plan for a period of not less than 3 months as set forth under Code Section 409A(a)(2)(C)(ii).” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed this 20 day of December, 2018. 

 

			
	HENRY SCHEIN, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ John Lee
	Title:	 	VP, Global Compensation & Benefits
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VILLARI BRANDES & KLINE, P.C. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

PLAINFIELD SPECIALTY HOLDINGS :

II, INC., et al. : NO. 09-2552

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2009, for the reasons

set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED

that the motion of the defendants Plainfield Specialty Holdings

II, Inc., Plainfield Offshore Holdings XI, Inc., and Plainfield

Offshore Holdings X, Inc. "to dismiss for improper venue or,

alternatively, for transfer to the United states District Court

for the Eastern District of Michigan" is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part:

(1) the motion to dismiss pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1406(a) is DENIED; and

(2) the alternative motion to transfer the action to

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Michigan is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III 

C.J.

2:09-cv-13028-NGE-MJH Doc # 2 Filed 07/31/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 133
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-134014, 333-132008, 333-124900, 333-118646, 333-118647, 333-99337, 333-68387, 333-48969, 333-35193, 333-24621, 33-90976, and 33-74780 of Health Net, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 of our reports datedFebruary 27, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules of Health Net Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s change in itsmethod of accounting for share-based compensation in 2006), and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Health Net, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California 

February 28, 2007
#### Hood Abercrombie v. State.

No. 25473.

November 14, 1951.

Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing Denied (Without Written Opinion) January 9, 1952.

Hon. G. V. Pardue, Judge Presiding.

*C. L. Harris,*Lubbock, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with the offense of maiming by wilfully and maliciously biting off an ear of Raymond C. Ragsdale. Upon trial he was convicted of the offense of aggravated assault, and his punishment was assessed by the jury at “$500.00 and 9 months in the county jail.”

He appeals from the judgment rendered on such verdict ordering that he be confined in jail for 9 months and that the State recover from him a fine of $500 and costs.

The court’s charge authorized a conviction for maiming or for aggravated assault or for simple assault and directed the jury to acquit if they had a reasonable doubt as to whether appellant acted wilfully and maliciously or in self defense.

Appellant now urges that the trial court erred in defining aggravated assault as one where serious bodily injury is inflicted, and omitting to definte “serious bodily injury.”

*548We find no objection to the charge calling this *omission*to the attention of the court before the charge was read to the jury. In the absence of such objection, appellant cannot now complain of the omission.

The verdict of the jury, viewed in the light of the court’s charge, is sufficient to show that the jury intended to assess the punishment at a fine of $500 and 9 months in jail. The trial court properly so construed the verdict in pronouncing judgment. See Lee v. State, 144 Tex. Cr. R. 306, 162 S.W.(2) 409.

The evidence shows that the injured party lost his ear while engaged in a fight with appellant, and is sufficient to support the jury’s finding that the assault by appellant was not justified.

The entire ear being removed from the head of the injured party, there appears to be no question that the injury was in fact a “serious bodily injury.”

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 717 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 717

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for each of the vessels SHAMROCK V and ENDEAVOUR.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1995

 Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
   coastwise trade for each of the vessels SHAMROCK V and ENDEAVOUR.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106 of title 
46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for each of--
            (1) the vessel SHAMROCK V (United States official number 
        900936); and
            (2) the vessel ENDEAVOUR (United States official number 
        947869).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF O'SULLIVAN INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,416
<INVENTORY>                                     56,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,952
<PP&E>                                         157,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,179
<BONDS>                                         22,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,820
<OTHER-SE>                                     167,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,058
<SALES>                                        379,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               379,632
<CGS>                                          267,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               267,630
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,844
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,144
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,213
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,931
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,931
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22


</TABLE>
Order entered August 15, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00916-CV

IN THE MATTER OF K.Z.S., A JUVENILE

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20J-043

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed October 21, 2021. The record was 

filed, and appellant’s brief was originally due December 23, 2021. We notified 

appellant the brief was overdue and ordered the brief to be filed within ten days. 

When a brief was not filed, we issued an order dated January 21, 2021 abating the 

case for a hearing in the trial court to determine why appellant’s brief had not been 

filed. On March 2, 2022, we reinstated the appeal and adopted the trial court’s 

findings including that on February 18, 2022 appellant’s counsel obtained authority 

from appellant to pursue the appeal on certain theories, appellant’s counsel was
prepared to file the brief in this appeal, and there was no need for the appointment 

of new counsel. We ordered counsel Casey T. Boyd to file appellant’s brief within 

ten days, and cautioned Mr. Boyd that failure to do so would result in the Court 

taking whatever action it deemed appropriate to ensure the appeal proceeded in a 

timely manner. Appellant’s brief was not filed as ordered.

Consequently, on May 3, 2022, we issued a second order abating the appeal 

for a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief had not been filed. On July 8, 

2022, we received the reporter’s record from the hearing. At that hearing, Mr. 

Boyd testified that after careful discussion with the guardian and his client, they 

were electing to withdraw the appeal. Mr. Boyd further testified that he would 

send “a waiver of appeal” to the trial court and to this Court. Although the clerk’s 

office has left voice mails regarding Mr. Boyd’s failure to file a motion to dismiss, 

to date, Mr. Boyd has not filed a motion to dismiss this appeal or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

We therefore ORDER Casey T. Boyd to file either a motion to dismiss this 

appeal or appellant’s brief BY 5:00 P.M. ON AUGUST 26, 2022. Mr. Boyd is 

CAUTIONED that the Court will not entertain any motions for extension of time 

in this case. If Mr. Boyd does not file a motion to dismiss or a brief by August 26, 

2022, the Court may initiate contempt proceedings against him for the failure and 

refusal to obey the Court’s order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(2). The Court may 
also take such other actions as may be appropriate, including filing a grievance 

against Mr. Boyd and referring this matter to the State Bar of Texas Commission 

for Lawyer Discipline for further proceedings.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. 

Casey T. Boyd by certified mail at his address as shown in our records. We also 

DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Tracy Gray, 

Presiding Judge, Kaufman County Court at Law No. 1; and to all parties.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
#### Arthur W. Tams, Appellant, v. G. Schirmer and Others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. No opinion.
Exhibit 99.2


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

In connection with the annual report of Capital Preferred Yield Fund-III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, as
filed with the Security and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mary M. Ebele, Principal Financial Officer of CAI Equipment
Leasing IV Corp., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     3.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.



By:      /s/Mary M. Ebele                              Dated: March 30, 2005
         ----------------
            Mary M. Ebele
Title:   Principal Financial Officer
#### The Pennsylvania Rd. Co. et al. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 23045

Decided March 23, 1932.)

*66*Messrs. Henderson, Burr, Randall $ Porter*and *Mr. Andrew D. Bodgers, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

*Messrs. Wilson <& Rector,*for plaintiff in error Erie Railroad Company.

*Messrs. Martin é Corry*and *Mr. John G. Durfey,*for plaintiff in error the Cincinnati & Lake Erie Railroad Company.

*Mr. G. T. Lewis, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error the New York Central Railroad Company.

*Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, and *Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*for defendant in error the Pnblio Utilities Commission.

*Mr. Beecher W. Waltermire*and *Mr. Ralph W. San-born,*for the American Stages, Inc.

By the Court.

The plaintiffs in error seek a reversal of the finding and order of the Public Utilities Commission wherein that commission granted the application of the American Stages, Inc., a motor transportation company under the laws of Ohio, to operate its passenger bus line, on a specified route, from its station in Cleveland, Ohio, to the Ohio-Kentucky state line, its destination being Covington, Kentucky, with a restriction and limitation to interstate commerce.

The ground upon which the reversal is urged is that the application for an interstate certificate is a subterfuge, and that the real purpose is to secure intrastate passenger business through and by means of óperation under an interstate certificate. The applicant asserts its good faith in the matter, and its purpose to do only an interstate business, making connection with other lines at the termination points of its route.

The evidence in this record does not warrant a finding by this court that the Public Utilities Commission should have reached the conclusion that the purpose of the applicant was to conduct an intrastate business. *67Such conclusion necessarily would have been based upon an assumption of a purpose of the applicant to do the very thing negatived by the terms of the application, and such assumption would result in the arbitrary refusal to grant any and every application for •interstate operation. The certificate granted expressly prohibited intrastate business.

The principles governing the Public Utilities Commission in proceedings of this character have been frequently announced and applied and the record in this case warrants no change or modification thereof. The finding and order of the commission being neither unreasonable nor unlawful is affirmed.

*Order affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Matthias, Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur.

Stephenson, J., not participating.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Ampersand Medical
Corporation Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) for March 31, 2000 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the Three-Months ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      346
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   957
<PP&E>                                             294
<DEPRECIATION>                                      69
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               22
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2138
<SALES>                                            362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   362
<CGS>                                              190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3139)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>