alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 257 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports DICK v . KOSKI PROF. GROUP Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff,

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland &

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, appellee and cross-appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J Russell Derr , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., for appellant. Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick. Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.
Heavican , C.J., Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam

. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 03/12/2021 09:10 AM CST- 258 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports DICK v . KOSKI PROF. GROUP Cite as 308 Neb. 257 concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group , 307 Neb. 599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020). We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule it, but modify the opinion as follows: (1) In the background section, under the subheading

“ Peremptory Challenges ,” we withdraw the last sentence of the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental tran

script, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in the appellate record.” (2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “ Peremptory Challenges ( Assignment of Error No . 1),” we withdraw the seventh paragraph and substitute the following: We do not decide that question here. While KPG has offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the record is insufficient to support its assignment of error even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Miller-Lerman , J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 614 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 614

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 5), 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the State of 
  Minnesota the New London National Fish Hatchery production facility.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NEW LONDON NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION 
              FACILITY.

    (a) Conveyance Authorized.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law and within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the State of Minnesota 
without reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the property comprising the New London National Fish 
Hatchery production facility, located outside of downtown New London, 
Minnesota, including--
            (1) all easements and water rights relating to that 
        property, and
            (2) all land, improvements, and related personal property 
        comprising that production facility.
    (b) Use of Property.--All property and interests conveyed under 
this section shall be used by the Minnesota Department of Natural 
Resources for the Minnesota fishery resources management program.
    (c) Use and Reversionary Interest.--The property conveyed to the 
State of Minnesota pursuant to this section shall be used by the State 
for purposes of fishery resources management, and if it is used for any 
other purpose all right, title, and interest in and to all property 
conveyed pursuant to this section shall revert to the United States. 
The State of Minnesota shall ensure that the property reverting to the 
United States is in substantially the same or better condition as at 
the time of transfer.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Team Nation Holdings
Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
     quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Date: May 20, 2009                        By:    /s/ Daniel J. Duffy
                                                 -------------------
                                                 Daniel J. Duffy
                                                 Principal Financial Officer




This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
EX-4.11



 Exhibit 4.11 

JOINDER AGREEMENT 
 November 22, 2013 

Delhaize Group 
 Square Marie Curie 40 

1070 Brussels 
 Belgium 

Attention: Chief Financial Officer 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is made to that certain cross-guarantee agreement, dated as of May 21, 2007 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from
time to time, the “Cross-Guarantee Agreement”), by and among Delhaize Group, a limited liability company (“société anonyme”) organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Belgium
(“Delhaize Group”), Delhaize America, LLC, a limited liability company wholly-owned by Delhaize Group organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina (“Delhaize America”), and the other
wholly-owned Subsidiaries of Delhaize Group signatory thereto or that have become a party thereto (collectively with Delhaize Group and Delhaize America, the “Guarantors” and individually, a
“Guarantor”). 
 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
Cross-Guarantee Agreement. 
 This letter supplements the Cross-Guarantee Agreement and is delivered by the undersigned, Delhaize America
Shared Services Group, LLC (the “New Guarantor”), pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Cross-Guarantee Agreement. The New Guarantor hereby agrees to be bound as a Guarantor by all of the terms, covenants and conditions set
forth in the Cross-Guarantee Agreement as of November 22, 2013. Without limiting the foregoing, the New Guarantor hereby makes each of the representations and warranties and agrees to each of the covenants applicable to Guarantors contained in
the Cross-Guarantee Agreement. 
 THIS LETTER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the New Guarantor has caused this letter to be executed and delivered by its duly authorized
officer as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	DELHAIZE AMERICA SHARED SERVICES GROUP, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ G. Linn Evans
		 	Name:	 	G. Linn Evans
		 	Title:	 	President, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 604

To amend section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation

Act of 1985 (relating to fees for certain customs services) to create

an exemption from fees for certain small aircraft travelling short distances.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 1995

Mr. GILLMOR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (relating to fees for certain

customs services) to create an exemption from fees for

certain small aircraft travelling short distances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 13031 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget

4 Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c) (relating to

5 fees for certain customs services) is amended in subsection

6 (b)(1)—

7 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and

8 (C) as subparagraphs (C) and (D), respectively; and
2

•HR 604 IH

1 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol2 lowing:

3 ‘‘(B) the arrival of any passenger aboard any

4 aircraft equipped to carry no more than 11 pas5 sengers, if—

6 ‘‘(i) the aircraft is being used to provide

7 transportation only between places that are no

8 more than 50 miles apart;

9 ‘‘(ii) the aircraft is in competition with a

10 ferry; and

11 ‘‘(iii) the fee for such transportation is less

12 than $35;’’.

Æ
#### Beverly J. SUDDETH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 03-3226.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 15, 2003.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
WAIVER AND FIRST  AMENDMENT dated as of April 30, 1999 to the Mortgage made
and  entered  into  as of  October  27,  1994  (the  "Agreement"),  from  Hirsch
International  Corp.  (the  "Mortgagor"),  a corporation  organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware,  and The Chase Manhattan Bank, formerly
known as Chemical Bank, a banking  corporation duly organized and existing under
the laws of the State of New York (the "Bank).

WHEREAS,  the  Mortgagor  wishes to amend and waive  certain  provisions  of the
Agreement with respect to certain reporting requirements;

WHEREAS,  the Bank has  consented to amend and waive  certain  provisions of the
Agreement to reflect the changes herein set forth;

NOW THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the premises and of the mutual  agreements
herein contained, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1. Waiver of Section 22 Events of Default (u) Compliance with Section 22(u)
of the Agreement is hereby waived to permit the Debt Service  Coverage  Ratio to
be less than the required 1.25 to 1.00 at January 31, 1999 (0.40) to 1.00.

     2.  Amendment  to Section 22 Events of Default (u) Section 22 (u) is hereby
amended as follows:  The Debt Service  Coverage Ratio of the mortgagor  shall be
not less than (0.50) to 1.00 at April 30, 1999,  July 31, 1999,  and October 31,
1999 and 1.25 to 1.00 at January 31, 2000 and thereafter.

     This  Waiver  and  First  Amendment  shall be  construed  and  enforced  in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

     Except as expressly  amended or consented to hereby,  the  Agreement  shall
remain in full force and effect in accordance  with the original  terms thereof.
The Waiver and First Amendment herein  contained is limited  specifically to the
matters set forth above and does not  constitute  directly or by  implication an
amendment or waiver of any other provision of the Agreement or any default which
may occur or may have occurred under the Agreement.

     Capitalized  terms used herein and not otherwise  defined herein shall have
the same meanings as defined in the Agreement.



<PAGE>

                                                                 
     The Mortgagor  hereby  represents and warrants that, after giving effect to
this Waiver and First Amendment, no Event of Default or Default exists under the
Agreement or any related documents.

     This Waiver and First Amendment  shall become  effective when duly executed
counterparts  hereof which, when taken together,  bear the signatures of each of
the parties hereto shall have been delivered to the Bank.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Mortgagor and the Bank have caused the Waiver and
First Amendment to be duly executed by their duly authorized officers, all as of
the day and year first above written.

                                          Hirsch International Corp.


                                               By:                            



(Seal)

ATTEST:


Secretary


     Accepted this day of , 1999 by The Chase Manhattan Bank,  formerly Chemical
Bank


By:                                         
Title:  Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7781

RICHARD DOUGLAS MURRAY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, ex rel.; DARRELL V.

MCGRAW, JR., Attorney General; JAMES

RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, D.O.C.; WILLIAM S.

HAINES, Warden, H.C.C.; HONORABLE GRAY SILVER;

HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER WILKES, Judge 23rd

Judicial Circuit,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-05-796-2)

Submitted: May 10, 2006 Decided: June 1, 2006

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Douglas Murray, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Richard D. Murray, Sr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his objection to the standing order referring

his case to a magistrate judge for report and recommendation. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Murray seeks to

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Murray’s motion for

appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                              5,676 
<SECURITIES>                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                        0    
<ALLOWANCES>                         0    
<INVENTORY>                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0    
<PP&E>                            653,947 
<DEPRECIATION>                     62,641 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    679,978 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                0    
<BONDS>                           333,250 
<COMMON>                              166 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0    
<PREFERRED>                            11 
<OTHER-SE>                        270,262 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      679,978 
<SALES>                              0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   90,073 
<CGS>                                0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      63,604 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 11,995 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    24,548 
<INCOME-TAX>                         0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                24,548 
<DISCONTINUED>                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       196 
<CHANGES>                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                       24,352 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        1.43 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        1.43 
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20

- 0080

_________________ IN RE PARENTING OF K.J.K.: DOREEN AND JAMES KING,

Petitioners and Appellants ,
v. KENLEY AND BRIAN CHILCOTT ,

Respondents and Appellees

. O R D E R

_________________ M. R. App. P. 10(7) requires redaction of confidential personal information from documents filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, including the full birth date of any person. The Court has determined that there is a reference to the full birth date of K.J.K. on page 1 of the Appellee’s response brief. Additionally, M. R App. P. 11(6)(b)(iv) requires that parties filing documents with the Clerk of the Supreme Court shall use the correct designations of the parties as set forth in M. R. App. P. 2. Because we reject the Appellee’s response brief for the violation of Rule 10(7) described above, we also require the Appellee to correct the party designations on the front page of Appellee’s brief. IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected for revisions necessary to comply with the referenced Rules

. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellee shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the referenced Rules and that the Appellee shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than those referenced in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and 04/29/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0080IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained

in M.R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to counsel for Appellee and to all parties of record.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 29 2020
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Asher
Zwebner, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Suspect Detection Systems, Inc.
(the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date: 
      May 17, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Asher
      ZwebnerName: 
      Asher ZwebnerTitle: 
      Chief Financial Officer and Director
                  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

t0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147507

PEOPLE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CANTON

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147507

COA: 313823

Wayne CC: 11

- 012457

- AR

CHARLES PHOENIX,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightning Gaming, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), each of us certifies as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States Code, to the best of our respective knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: November 13, 2009


By:  /s/ Brian Haveson


Brian Haveson


Chief Executive Officer





Date:  November 13, 2009


By:  /s/ Robert Ciunci


Robert Ciunci


Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Zhiguang
      ZhangZhiguang
      ZhangChief
      Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.