alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1993-C, Ltd's balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         120,200
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,395
<PP&E>                                         4,065,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,114,194)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,210,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,836
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,201,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,210,551
<SALES>                                        501,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               504,948
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  624,940<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (203,766)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (203,766)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (203,766)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and 
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and 
interest expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                                      
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                                      
                                      
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-80147) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, 1994
Directors' Stock Option Plan and Directors' Warrants of SigmaTron
International, Inc. of our report dated June 19, 1998, except for Note 16, as
to which the date is July 1, 1998 and Note 6, as to which the date is July 14,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
SigmaTron International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended April 30, 1998.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
July 22, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED
AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   43,141
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,518,343
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      2,662,349
<PP&E>                                                  751,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                          589,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        7,365,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,818,402
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                 38,197
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            4,546,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          7,365,262
<SALES>                                              36,015,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     36,015,273
<CGS>                                                33,048,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        33,048,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      4,330,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      257,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,621,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            232,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,853,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,853,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              (.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.61)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNo. 333-142712 and Registration Statement No. 333-55836 on Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-131949 and Registration Statement No. 333-116972, as amended, on Forms S-3, of our reports dated November 26,2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of The Pantry, Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of ThePantry, Inc. for the year ended September 27, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Charlotte, North Carolina 

November 26, 2007
#### In the Matter of Harry M. BLAIR, Robert Owston, and Joseph Walsh, Common Stockholders Committee, Interveners, et al., Petitioners.

No. 4298.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1938.

George Pfeil, of New York City, in support of the petition.

PER CURIAM.

Mandamus denied and petition dismissed. Order filed.
#### Jennie Heitman, as Administratrix, etc., of Louis Heitman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order *927reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff, within twenty days, stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of §5,000 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J. and Kruse, J., who dissented and voted for absolute affirmance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          16,975
<SECURITIES>                                     8,026
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,298
<PP&E>                                           4,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,480
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141866 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141866 

 COA: 290259 

Wayne CC: 08-004816-FC 

DEWAYNE MARQUIS BINYARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 of Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware (the “Company”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

March 23, 2007

 

|   | /s/ JOSEPH V. TARANTO |
|--------|-----------------------|

Joseph V. Taranto

Chairman and Chief

Executive Officer

 

|   | /s/ CRAIG EISENACHER |
|--------|----------------------|

Craig Eisenacher

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 23 (a)

                               Consent of KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-80285
and 33-80287 on Forms S-8, and 333-00916 on Form S-3 of Southern Financial
Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December
31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. Our
report refers to our reliance on another auditor's report with respect to
amounts related to The Horizon Bank of Virginia for the year ended December 31,
1998, included in the aforementioned consolidated financial statements.

Richmond, Virginia
March 30, 2001
#### DURADENE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. M. Hampton MAGRUDER, Collector of Internal Revenue for the United States for the District of Maryland, Appellee.

No. 4320.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

April 14, 1938.

David Hettleman, of Baltimore, Md., for appellant.

Frederick G. Rita, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen. (James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Norman D. Keller, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and ■ Bernard J. Flynn, U. S. Atty., and G. Randolph Aiken, Asst. U.'S. Atty., both of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellee.

Before NORTHCOTT and SOPER, Circuit Judges and HAYES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the opinion of the judge below, 21 F.Supp. 426, which is adopted as the opinion of this court, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 653 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 653

 To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White 
      Plains, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 1995

  Mr. Engel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse under construction in White 
      Plains, New York, as the ``Thurgood Marshall United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 300 Quarropas 
Street in White Plains, New York, shall be known and designated as the 
``Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Thurgood 
Marshall United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

LISA APPLEGATE, *

* No. 16

- 379V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Filed: April 24 , 2017

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Attorneys’ fees and costs

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **

Jeffrey S. Pop

, Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law

, Beverly Hills, CA , for petitioner;

Amy P. Kokot , U nited States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, D C, for respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS 1

On April 9, 2017

, petitioner move d for final attorneys’ fees and costs in the

above

- captioned matter. Upon review of petitioner ’s application, respondent

raised no objections to the attorneys’ fees sought . Resp’t’s Resp., filed April 21,

2017 , at 1

.

On March 24, 2016

, Lisa Applegate filed a petition for compensation

alleging that the tetanus

- diphtheria

- acellular pertussis (“TDaP” ) vaccine, which s he

received on May 5, 2014 , caused her to suffer Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (“GBS”)

and Bell’s Palsy

. T he undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to

petitioner based on the parties’ joint stipulation. Decision , issued Feb. 16, 2017

, 2017 WL 972105

.

1 The E

- Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its website.

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of

medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any

redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Because petitioner received compensation, petitioner is entitled to an award

of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e). Petitioner seek s a total of

$18,065.36 in attorney s’ fees and costs. I n compl iance with General Or der No. 9,

petitioner state s that s he advanced no monies for re imbu rsable costs in pursuit of

his claim.

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $18,065.36 in the form of a check made payable to

petitioner and petitioner ’s attorney, Jeffrey S. Pop, of Jeffrey S.

Pop, Attorney at Law

, for attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs

available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(e).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the

clerk of the co urt shall enter judgment in accordance herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment ca n be expedited by the parties’ joint filing

of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2016 

# Order

September 9 , 2016

150643 ( 10 6 ) (108)(111)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

BOBAN TEMELKOSKI

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 150643

COA: 313670

Wayne CC: 94

- 000424

- FH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the separate motion s of the Law Professors and the

Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers et al . to file briefs amicus curiae are

GRANTED. The amicus brief s submitted by those entities on September 2 , 2016

, are

accepted for filing

. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

appellant to file a reply in excess of the page limit restriction is GRANTED. The 16

- page reply submitted on September 7, 2016, is accepted for filing.
#### John J. Delany, Respondent, v. R. Fulton Cutting, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
#### Ex Parte Z. T. King.

No. 24944.

November 1, 1950.

*Bracewell & Wright,*Huntsville, for relator.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Relator is a prisoner in the state penitentiary and addresses his original petition to this court seeking his discharge from the custody of the penitentiary officials.

The petition alleges that appellant was charged with murder in the district court of Sabine County; that he was tried by *218a jury which returned a verdict on the 20th day of November, 1946, and assessed his punishment at twenty-five years in the penitentiary. It then recites that the judgment of the district court was entered that he “be confined to the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than twenty-five years.”

Certified copies of the proceedings have been obtained and are before us in considering this application. The original judgment contains the jury’s verdict as follows: “We the jury find the defendant Z. T. King guilty as charged in the indictment and assess his punishment at twenty-five years confinement in the State Penitentiary. H. E. Reeves, Foreman.”

The court has no authority to enter a judgment for any term other than that specified in the jury’s verdict. In as much as it is contained in the judgment it makes the same definite, regardless of the further recitation that he is to serve “for a term of not less than 2 years nor more than 25 years.” See Ex Parte Simmons, 154 Tex. Cr. R. 544, 229 S. W. 2d 167.

The relief prayed for is denied and appellant is remanded to the authorities of the state penitentiary to serve the term assessed against him.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H.R. 660

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 7 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend the Fair Housing Act to modify the exemption

from certain familial status discrimination prohibitions

granted to housing for older persons.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing for Older Per5 sons Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS.

7 Subparagraph (C) of section 807(b)(2) of the Fair

8 Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3607(b)(2)) is amended to read

9 as follows:
2

HR 660 RFS

1 ‘‘(C) that meets the following requirements:

2 ‘‘(i) The housing is in a facility or commu3 nity intended and operated for the occupancy of

4 at least 80 percent of the occupied units by at

5 least one person 55 years of age or older.

6 ‘‘(ii) The housing facility or community

7 publishes and adheres to policies and proce8 dures that demonstrate the intent required

9 under clause (i), whether or not such policies

10 and procedures are set forth in the governing

11 documents of such facility or community.

12 ‘‘(iii) The housing facility or community

13 complies with rules made by the Secretary for

14 the verification of occupancy. Such rules shall

15 allow for that verification by reliable surveys

16 and affidavits and shall include examples of the

17 types of policies and procedures relevant to a

18 determination of compliance with the require19 ment of clause (ii). Such surveys and affidavits

20 shall be admissible in administrative and judi21 cial proceedings for the purposes of such ver22 ification.’’.
3

HR 660 RFS

1 SEC. 3. GOOD FAITH ATTEMPT AT COMPLIANCE DEFENSE

2 AGAINST CIVIL MONEY DAMAGES.

3 Section 807(b) of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C.

4 3607(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(5) GOOD FAITH RELIANCE.—(A) A person shall

6 not be held personally liable for monetary damages for a

7 violation of this title if such person reasonably relied, in

8 good faith, on the application of the exemption under this

9 subsection relating to housing for older persons.

10 ‘‘(B) For the purposes of this paragraph, a person

11 engaged in the business of residential real estate trans12 actions may show good faith reliance on the application

13 of the exemption by showing that—

14 ‘‘(i) such person has no actual knowledge that

15 the facility or community is not, or will not, be eligi16 ble for such exemption; and

17 ‘‘(ii) the facility or community has certified to

18 such person, in writing and on oath or affirmation,

19 that the facility or community complies with the re20 quirements for such exemption.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.