alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to**
 **18
        U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **as
        Adopted Pursuant to**
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
        Line
        Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Julie H. Edwards, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully complies
        with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of
        1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
        JULIE H. EDWARDS
 Name:
        Julie H. Edwards
 Title:
        Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Date:
        May
        10, 2006
 
 
 
 
 This
        Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
        incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
        Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
        whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
        general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
        the
        Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
        upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Periodic Report



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Catalyst
International, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 29, 2004



/s/ David H. JacobsonDavid H. JacobsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
ACCOMPANIES THIS REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO BE FILED BY THE COMPANY FOR PURPOSES OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Xianfu Han, the Chief Executive Officer of CHINA ADVANCED
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:





1. 
    The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. 
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 11th
day of February, 2011.





/s/
      Xianfu HanXianfu
      HanChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and will be retained by China
Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.18A 
Schedule of Named Executive Officers Party to Change of Control Employment Agreement (BE4 and Higher Version without gross-up or window period - current) 
(As of December 31, 2019) 
Jay K. Oberg
#### Kenneth M. Masden v. State

No. 25588.

December 19, 1951.

*539Hon. David McGee, Judge Presiding.

*Raymond Wilson,*Fort Worth, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault upon the person of a peace officer; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $50.00.

Two police officers of the city of Fort Worth, responding to a call in the early morning hours, met two women who reported that an assault had been committed on one of them by a man who lived in Room 9 of á certain hotel.

The officers went immediately to the hotel and to Room 9 therein. Their knocks upon the door were not answered, and they finally got a bell boy to let them in the room. Inside, they found appellant undressed and in bed. In resisting an arrest by the officers, appellant planted a blow in the officer’s groin with his knee, which assault became the basis for this prosecution.

It may be seen from the testimony of the officers that they acted upon the information that a misdemeanor had been committed, and upon this and nothing more they invaded the home of appellant without a warrant and arrested him. This was an illegal arrest and justified appellant in attempting to extricate himself from such custody. There is no question of excessive force having been used by appellant.

The officers did not bring the arrest of appellant within the terms of Article 212, Code of Criminal Procedure, or within the terms of the city ordinance of the city of Fort Worth introduced in evidence, both of which authorize arrests without a warrant in certain cases but not under the facts of the case at bar. See also Rodriguez v. State, 146 Tex. Cr. R. 206, 172 S. W. (2d) 502, and cases cited there.

Appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence must be sustained.

*540Judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Moore Medical Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John M. Zinzarella, Vice President, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John M.
Zinzarella


John M. Zinzarella, CPA


Vice President, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer


November 7, 2002
#### Stanivukovic *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 23489

Decided April 20, 1932.)

*Mr. Ralph B. Cohen,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Jesse K. George*and *Mr. Stuart B. Moreland,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHIYONG LI,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND , Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 71263

Agency No. A087

- 715

- 963

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 30 , 2021 * *

Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Shiyong Li, a native and citizen of China

, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) March 26, 2015 order d enying his motion to

reopen proceedings.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 5 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 71263

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Cano

- Merida v. INS , 311 F.3d 960,

964 (9th Cir. 2002). W e will rever se a denial of a motion to reopen only if the

denial was “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.” Bhasin v. Gonzales , 423 F.3d

977, 983 (9th Cir. 2005) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). We deny

the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Li failed to establish

prima facie eligibility for asylum. Ramirez

- Munoz v. Lynch , 816 F.3d 1226, 1228

(9th Cir. 2016). Li did not adduce “credible, direct, and specific evidence” to

demonstrate an objectively well

- founded fear that he would be persecuted by the

Chin e se government based upon his p olitical activities in the United States

. Malty

v. Ashcroft , 381 F.3d 942, 947 (9th Cir. 2004). As the BIA explained

, Li has not

presented sufficient evid ence that the Chinese government will target him in

China. Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). For example, Li

is not a high

- profile activist, he submitted articles that do not relate to him, and the

letter from his daughter is vague.

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the

mandate.

P ETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10624

Summary Calendar

 

MICHAEL SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ROBERT WHITE;

ROBERT CHANCE; JAMES E. BOWMAN;

MICHAEL SAVERS; ELIZA WIMBERLY;

MARC MARSHALL,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-139

- - - - - - - - - -

September 20, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Smith, prisoner #677990, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 claims

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), now redesignated as

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Smith contends that the defendants conspired
No. 96-10624

- 2 -

to deprive him of his civil rights. Smith also contends that the

defendants deprived him of due process in connection with his

disciplinary hearing and by changing his classification. Smith

asserts that two of the defendants were indifferent to his

medical condition because they ordered him to work in muddy water

without protective foot gear.

We have reviewed the record and Smith’s brief and AFFIRM the

district court’s dismissal for the reasons adopted by the

district court. Smith v. Johnson, No. 2:96-CV-0139 (N.D. Tex.

May 16, 1996). Because Smith failed to brief his claims against

Wimberly, he has abandoned them. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993) (issues must be briefed to be

preserved). 

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Gil Boosidan, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Suspect Detection Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Registrant for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  Date: January 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Gil BoosidanName:  Gil BoosidanTitle:  Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 160 (Monday, August 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 48235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1766-DR]


Indiana; Amendment No. 17 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1766-DR), dated June 8, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 8, 2008.

    Wabash County for Public Assistance.
    (The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-19005 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### David Jones v. State

No. 25423.

November 7, 1951.

Hon. A. S. Mauzey, Judge Presiding.

*Frank Ginzel,*Colorado City, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Murder is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

From the state’s standpoint, this is an unexplained killing, committed during the time all the parties were engaged in a drunken orgy.

No express motive for the killing appears. Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, admitted having fired a shot under circumstances which the trial court deemed sufficient to require a charge on self-defense. He denied having purposely fired the shot at deceased.

Deceased was killed by a bullet from appellant’s pistol, which entered the head at the corner of the left eye.

It is appellant’s contention that the testimony fails to establish the corpus delicti — that is, that deceased came to his death as the criminal act or agency of the appellant.

As to this contention, it is necessary only to call attention to the fact that appellant admitted soon after the killing that he “had shot a negro,” deceased being a Negro. This admission, together with the wounds inflicted and the facts above mentioned, amply establish the corpus delicti.

*429Bills of exception appear complaining of argument of state’s counsel.

The arguments complained of violated no mandatory statute, nor was any new fact thereby injected into the case. We are unable, especially in the light of the minimum punishment assessed, to say that same were improper, harmful, or prejudicial.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.
EXHIBIT
32.1 SARBANES OXLEY SECTION 906
  CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Extreme Home
Staging,  Inc. (the “Company”)  certifies, pursuant to her knowledge,
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine month
ended December 31,  2008 fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the
information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
   Dated:  January 21,
2009
 /s/ Milka
Fixler
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Moore Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda
M. Autore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  Linda M. Autore
Linda M. Autore
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ C ase No. 5D 20 23- 2977 LT Case No. 2020
- CF
- 001101 -A

_____________________________ T ODD R. M AGGIO , A ppellant,
v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , A ppellee.

_____________________________ 3.85 0 A ppeal from t he Circuit Court for Citrus County
. Joe l D
. Fritton , J udge
. Todd R. Maggio , Trenton , pro se. N o Appearance for Appellee
. M ay 1 4, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . S OUD , K ILBANE , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Samuel
H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that:





The
Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.Sam
      H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial OfficerDated:
      August 19, 2008
Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationApril Corporation
    
    ColoradoArden Park Ventures, LLC
    
    FloridaBeazer Allied Companies Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Clarksburg, LLC
    
    MarylandBeazer Commercial Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer General Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Capital Trust I
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Corp.
    
    TennesseeBeazer Homes Holdings Corp.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Indiana, LLP
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Indiana Holding Corp.
    
    IndianaBeazer Homes Investments, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Michigan, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Sales, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Texas Holdings, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Homes Texas, LP
    
    DelawareBeazer Mortgage Corporation
    
    DelawareBeazer Realty Corp.
    
    GeorgiaBeazer Realty, Inc.
    
    New JerseyBeazer Realty Los Angeles, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Realty Sacramento, Inc.
    
    DelawareBeazer Realty Services, LLC
    
    DelawareBeazer SPE, LLC
    
    GeorgiaBeazer/Squires Realty, Inc.
    
    North CarolinaBH Building Products, LP
    
    DelawareBH Procurement Services, LLC
    
    DelawareDove Barrington Development LLC
    
    DelawareHomebuilders Title Services of Virginia, Inc.
    
    VirginiaHomebuilders Title Services, Inc.
    
    DelawareParagon Title, LLC
    
    IndianaSecurity Title Insurance Company
    
    VermontTexas Lone Star Title, LP
    
    TexasThe Ridings Development LLC
    
    DelawareTrinity Homes, LLC
    
    IndianaUnited Home Insurance Company, A Risk Retention Group
    
    Vermont
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-17-00683-CV

Jane Doe and John Doe, Appellants

v.

Arguello Hope & Associates, PLLC; Philip K. Broderick, Individually; 

Andres A. Arguello, Individually; Samantha Fenwich, Individually; Schavon J. Jahn; 

and Albert Zavala, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 433RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2017-0422D, HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On November 1, 2017, we informed appellants that it appeared from the clerk’s

record that they were attempting to appeal from an interlocutory order that was not immediately

appealable under statute. We requested a response explaining how we might exercise jurisdiction

over the appeal no later than November 17. To date, appellants have not responded to our letter.

We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see also id.

R. 42.3(c) (court of appeals may dismiss if appellant does not comply with notice from clerk

requiring response within certain time).
__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Field, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: December 5, 2017

2