alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         37,596
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               9,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    1,075,254
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         289,448
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           292,841
<LOANS>                                        978,738
<ALLOWANCE>                                    8,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,485,729
<DEPOSITS>                                     1,628,298
<SHORT-TERM>                                   580,206
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            32,361
<LONG-TERM>                                    50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       118,329
<OTHER-SE>                                     76,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 2,485,729
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                79,619
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              73,585
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               615
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               153,819
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             63,432
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             86,828
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          66,991
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,650
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (5)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                39,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                33,539
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     33,539
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   18,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.52
<LOANS-NON>                                    9,101
<LOANS-PAST>                                   201
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               5,182
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  773
<RECOVERIES>                                   137
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              8,941
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           8,941
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        5,676
        


</TABLE>
Opinion issued May 6, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-21-00096-CR

———————————

LINDA LIZETTE LERMA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 461st District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 82180-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 17, 2018, a jury found appellant, Linda Lizette Lerma, guilty of 

the felony offense of murder. The jury sentenced appellant to forty years’ 

confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Our Court affirmed 

appellant’s conviction on direct appeal. See Lerma v. State, No. 01-18-00999-CR, 
2

2019 WL 5996380, at *1 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 14, 2019, no pet.) 

(mem. op, not designated for publication). The mandate issued on January 24, 2020.

On February 1, 2021, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal seeking a second 

appeal from her final 2018 conviction. The notice of appeal is untimely, but more 

fundamentally we lack jurisdiction to consider a second appeal of appellant’s final 

conviction. See Hines v. State, 70 S.W. 955, 957 (Tex. Crim. App. 1902) (“[O]nly 

one appeal can be made from a verdict and judgment of conviction in any case.”). 

The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is 

through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of 

Criminal Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 5 (providing that “[a]fter 

conviction, the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other 

proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner”); see 

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 43.2(f); see, e.g., Hosea v. State, No. 01-11-01050-CR, 2012 WL 2345351, *1 

(Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 21, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated 

for publication) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction defendant’s subsequent appeal 

of conviction that had previously been affirmed); Arabzadegan v. State, No. 03-19-

00728-CR, 2020 WL 370880, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 23, 2020, pet. ref'd) 

(mem. op., not designated for publication) (same); McDonald v. State, 401 S.W.3d 
3

360, 361–63 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2013, pet. ref'd) (same). Any pending motions 

are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Farris.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Sun American Bancorp (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 28, 2007 |  | /s/ MICHAELE GOLDEN    
|                     |  | Michael E. Golden      
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |                        
|                     |  |                        
|Date: March 28, 2007 |  | /s/ ROBERTNICHOLS      
|                     |  | Robert Nichols         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
223 So.2d 519

#### Joseph O. WIGGINS et al. v. STAPLETON BAPTIST CHURCH.

1 Div. 570.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 8, 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1969.

*175C. LeNoir Thompson, Bay Minette, for appellants.

Chason, Stone & Chason, Bay Minette, for appellee.

LAWSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Baldwin County, in Equity, rendered on August 28, 1968.

There are thirteen assignments of error, none of which complies with Supreme Court Rule 1, as revised on March 21, 1966, so as to require that “each assignment shall list the page or pages of the transcript of the record on which the ruling is recorded.”

While it is true that the revised Rule, -supra, does not appear in the Appendix, 'Title 7, Code 1940, or in the Cumulative Pocket Part to the Recompiled Code of 1958, it does appear in 279 Alabama at page XXIII. Reference to that revision was made by this court in the case of State v. Barnhill, 280 Ala. 574, 196 So.2d 691, and the revised rule was applied in National Finance Company, Inc. v. Rowe, 281 Ala. 658, 659, 207 So.2d 133, 134.

In the case last cited we said:

> “We hold that the revision, supra, mandates that each assignment of error shall list the page or pages of the transcript on which the ruling is recorded, and that it has application to all appeals submitted after March 21, 1966.”

See Edmondson v. Edmondson, 281 Ala. 191, 200 So.2d 652; Jones v. Miller et al., 282 Ala. 231, 210 So.2d 793.

Appellant having failed to comply with Supreme Court Rule 1, as revised on March *21,*1966, the decree of the trial court is •affirmed.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and ITARWOOD, JJ., concur.
#### Frank Nessenius, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. The Town of Rose, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 705

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit citizenship at birth,

merely by virtue of birth in the United States, to persons with citizen

or legal resident mothers.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1995

Mr. GALLEGLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit

citizenship at birth, merely by virtue of birth in the

United States, to persons with citizen or legal resident

mothers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITING CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH, MERELY BY

4 VIRTUE OF BIRTH IN THE UNITED STATES,

5 TO PERSONS WITH LEGAL RESIDENT MOTH6 ERS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 301(a) of the Immigra8 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)) is amended
2

•H 705 IH

1 by inserting before the semicolon the following: ‘‘, of a

2 mother who is a citizen or legal resident of the United

3 States’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply to persons born after the date

6 of ratification of an article of amendment to the Constitu7 tion of the United States that repeals the first sentence

8 of section 1 of the fourteenth article of amendment to the

9 Constitution of the United States.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, we, the undersigned Jeffrey D. Lewis, Chief
Executive Officer and Melinda M. Hale, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Malan
Realty Investors, Inc (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on our knowledge,
that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:  /s/ Jeffrey D. Lewis
     -----------------------
     Jeffrey D. Lewis



By:  /s/ Melinda M. Hale
     -----------------------
     Melinda M. Hale


March 26, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23





               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-1394) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of
Catalyst International, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-97522C) pertaining to the 1997 Director Stock Option Plan of Catalyst
International, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-62896)
pertaining to the Catalyst International, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan and
Catalyst International, Inc. U.K. Approved Company Share Option Scheme of our
report dated February 7, 2003, except for Note 3 as to which the date is March
17, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Catalyst International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2002.



                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 28, 2003
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

DOREEN M. TITO a/k/a DOREEN TITO, DAVID J. TITO a/k/a DAVID 

TITO, HILLSBORO WINDSOR CONDOMINIUM INC., MORTGAGE 

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, AS 

NOMINEE FOR AMERICA’S WHOLESALE LENDER, OCTAGON 

HOLDINGS, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 4D16-1307

[October 26, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Kathleen D. Ireland, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 12-

19315.

Jason Joseph of Gladstone Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

David W. Langley of David W. Langley, P.A., Plantation, for appellee, 

David Tito.

Thomas H. Lehrer (unknown tenant, n/k/a Thomas H. Lehrer), 

Lauderdale-By-The Sea, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) by China Sports Holding Company Limited (the “Company”), I, Wing Sang Tommy Lo, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Wing Sang Tommy LoWing Sang Tommy LoChief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer




This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished upon request.
Exhibit 10.20  FIRST
AMENDMENT
TO THE
SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT  THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SEVERANCE PROTECTION AGREEMENT (this Amendment)
is made as of October 2, 2008, by and between NMS Communications
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Joel Hughes (the Executive).  Capitalized terms used herein an not
otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Severance
Protection Agreement dated as of June 6, 2008 by and between the Company
and the Executive (the Severance Agreement).  WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have entered into Severance
Agreement;  WHEREAS, the Company is contemplating a sale
of its Communications Platform business (the Business) and has entered into
an Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 12, 2008 with Dialogic
Corporation (the Asset Purchase Agreement) pursuant to which the Company will
sell substantially all of the assets of the Business;  WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have
agreed that the sale of the Business will not constitute a Change of Control
under the Severance Agreement; and  WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire
to amend the Severance Agreement to reflect the foregoing.  NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive
hereby agree:  1.That
the Severance Agreement is amended by adding the following sentence to the end
of the last paragraph in Section 15.6 of the Severance Agreement:  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth
herein, the sale of the Companys NMS Communications business (or any successor
thereto, the Business) shall not constitute a Change of Control including,
without limitation, the proposed sale of the Business contemplated by that
certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of September 12, 2008 between
the Company and Dialogic Corporation (as originally executed and as the same
may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time in accordance with
its terms).  2.Except
as amended by this Amendment, the Severance Agreement remains in full force and
effect without modification or waiver.  3.This
Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the Commonwealth
of Massachusetts without giving effect to its conflict of laws provisions.  Any action brought by any party to this
Amendment shall be brought and maintained in a court of competent jurisdiction
in Middlesex or Suffolk Counties in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.


4.This
Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and by the parties hereto
in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be
an original and all of which together shall be deemed to constitute one and the
same agreement.  [Remainder of Page Intentionally
Blank]  2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed
as a sealed instrument by the Company and the Executive as of the date first
set forth above.  NMS
  COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONBy:
  /s/ Robert
  P. SchechterName: Robert
  P. SchechterTitle: CEOEXECUTIVE/s/ Joel
  HughesJoel Hughes  3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         8,821
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 38,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,014
<INVENTORY>                                   22,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              79,511
<PP&E>                                       177,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                88,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               178,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         35,907
<BONDS>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      76,824
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    5,559
<OTHER-SE>                                    21,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 178,136
<SALES>                                       59,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              59,997
<CGS>                                         40,207
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 40,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              14,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,994
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,994
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .17
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3





STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the three months ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.,


Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer


Dated: June 20, 2012
** Exhibit      32.1**

| (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August                20, 2007 | By:                /s/ Darrin M. Ocasio  |
|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                             | Darrin                M. Ocasio               |
|                                             | President                                     |
#### John O’Neill v. West Side Savings Bank.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### Adelbert D. Risley, Appellant, v. George H. Eiswald, Respondent, Impleaded with Charles H. Harlow and Others.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury as to the defendant's fraud. All concurred, except Kruse and Robson, JJ., who dissented.