alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

ARTICLE 5

<S>                             <C>
PERIOD-TYPE                   3-MOS
FISCAL-YEAR-END                          OCT-27-2001
PERIOD-END                               JAN-27-2001
CASH                                            3649
SECURITIES                                      1154
RECEIVABLES                                      714
ALLOWANCES                                         0
INVENTORY                                        489
CURRENT-ASSETS                                  6111
PP&E                                            1751
DEPRECIATION                                     973
TOTAL-ASSETS                                    6892
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                              181
BONDS                                              0
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                0
PREFERRED                                          0
COMMON                                           250
OTHER-SE                                        6461
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                      6892
SALES                                           1070
TOTAL-REVENUES                                  1070
CGS                                              738
TOTAL-COSTS                                      738
OTHER-EXPENSES                                   171
LOSS-PROVISION                                     0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                   0
INCOME-PRETAX                                    221
INCOME-TAX                                        95
INCOME-CONTINUING                                126
DISCONTINUED                                       0
EXTRAORDINARY                                      0
CHANGES                                            0
NET-INCOME                                       126
EPS-BASIC                                        .16
EPS-DILUTED                                      .16


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Levcor
         International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June
         30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
         date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pramila Devi Shaheed, Chief Financial
         Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
         Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2007

By:    /s/ Pramila Devi Shaheed
       --------------------------
       Pramila Devi Shaheed
       Chief Financial Officer
#### ROSS v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS.

No. 16355.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 22, 1936.

For former opinion, see 168 So. 353.

Porteous, Johnson & Humphrey, of New Orleans, for interveners-appellants.

J. I. McCain, of New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Denegre, Leovy & Chaffe and N. P. Phillips, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Our attention has been directed to the fact that the sum of $325.50 was improperly allowed as a credit against the compensation awarded the plaintiff in our decree.

Our decree will, therefore, be amended so as to disallow the credit.

Original decree amended; rehearing refused. (All applications.)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Post Effective  Amendment
No. 1 to  Registration  Statement  No.  33-94914 on Form S-8,  Registration  no.
333-30237  on Form S-8 and  Registration  No.  333-22535  on Form S-3 of  Hirsch
International  Corp.  and  Subsidiaries  of our  report  dated  April 22,  1999,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hirsch  International  Corp. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 1999.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Jericho, New York
May 14, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 61

To abolish the ex officio positions on the Federal Election Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Livingston introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To abolish the ex officio positions on the Federal Election Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF EX OFFICIO POSITIONS ON THE FEDERAL ELECTION 
              COMMISSION.

    (a) In General.--The second sentence of section 306(a)(1) of the 
Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(1)) is amended 
by striking out ``the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives or their designees, ex officio and without the 
right to vote, and''.
    (b) Clerical Amendments.--Paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) of 
subsection (a) of section 306 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (2 U.S.C. 437c(a)(3), (4), and (5)) are each amended by striking 
out ``(other than the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the 
House of Representatives)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ed Joe Garbs v. State.

No. 25018.

December 6, 1950.

*W. J. Baldwin,*Beaumont, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In March, 1950, appellant pleaded guilty before the court to the felony offense of driving while intoxicated, and his punishment was fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. The imposition of sentence upon that judgment was by the trial court suspended, and appellant was placed upon probation, under the power and authority conferred by Art. 781b, *291Vernon’s Code of Criminal Procedure, known as the Adult Probation and Parole Law.

About two months thereafter, the trial court, upon motion of the district attorney, revoked the probation.

The judgment of revocation recites that “the defendant is hereby sentenced to serve one (1) year in the penitentiary of the State of Texas.”

Unless the language just above quoted constitutes a sentence, within the meaning of the law, the record does not reflect that sentence has been passed upon the appellant.

A sentence is the order of the court, made in the presence of the defendant and entered of record, pronouncing the judgment and ordering the same to be carried into execution in the manner prescribed by law. Art. 767, C. C. P.

There appears no fixed or inflexible form to be used for the sentence. The one mandatory provision is that it “shall be pronounced in the presence of the defendant. . . .” Art. 768, C. C. P.

There is nothing in this record showing that this mandatory provision of the statute was complied with. The order revoking the probation and attempting to pronounce sentence nowhere contains a recital that same was done in the presence of the appellant.

We are constrained to conclude that, as here presented, no sentence has been pronounced against appellant, as required by law.

A sentence in a felony case is the final judgment, and necessary for the jurisdiction of this court over the appeal. Support-, ing authorities will be found under Note 3 of Art. 769, Vernon’s C. C. P.

Because this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
#### Solomon Sachs, Appellant, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed by default, with costs.— Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
Order entered June 14, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00183-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.J.H., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 85395

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal which we abated to allow the trial court an 

opportunity to conduct a hearing to determine if the clerk’s and reporter’s records 

are complete. Specifically, the trial court was to determine (1) whether documents 

from trial court cause number 80,406, which was consolidated into the underlying 

cause, were properly transferred at the time of consolidation; (2) whether hearings 

were held on December 4, 2017, September 28, 2018, February 5, 2019, July 8, 

2019, October 29, 2019, December 2, 2019, March 2, 2020, August 2, 2020, and as 

referenced in volume seven of the reporter’s record; and, (3) if hearings were held 

on any of those dates and/or as referenced in volume 7, whether a record was made 
and the name of the reporter who took the record. The trial court held the hearing 

on June 4, 2021 and filed written findings of fact and conclusions of law.

In relevant part, the trial court found that documents from trial court cause 

number 80,406 were not originally consolidated into the underlying cause but have 

been since, and a supplemental clerk’s record containing those documents has been 

filed. The trial court also found hearings were held on December 4, 2017, 

September 28, 2018, February 5, 2019, July 8, 2019, October 29, 2019, March 2, 

2020, and August 4, 2020, but no testimony was taken at those hearings and 

appellant was not requesting that a record of those hearings be filed.

We ADOPT the trial court’s findings. As the appellate record is complete, 

we ORDER appellant to file his brief no later than July 6, 2021. 

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 638

To abolish the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice and

to eliminate the promotion of civilian marksmanship by the Department

of Defense.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. STARK, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mrs.

COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. YATES, Mr.

FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Ms. PELOSI, Mr.

CLAY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. FOGLIETTA, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr.

EVANS, and Mr. VELAZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To abolish the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle

Practice and to eliminate the promotion of civilian

marksmanship by the Department of Defense.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ABOLISHMENT OF BOARD.

4 The National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Prac5 tice is abolished.
2

•HR 638 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF PROMOTION OF CIVILIAN MARKS2 MANSHIP.

3 Sections 4307, 4308, 4309, 4310, 4311, 4312, and

4 4313 of title 10, United States Code, are repealed.

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 This Act, and the amendments made by this Act,

7 shall take effect 90 days after the date of the enactment

8 of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard N. Marshall, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   RICHARD N. MARSHALL


Richard N. Marshall


Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





November 4, 2010











This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MELISSA PRINE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Robert C. Chambers,

District Judge. (CR-04-229)

Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd A. Twyman, TWYMAN LAW OFFICES, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellant. Charles T. Miller, Acting United States Attorney, W.

Chad Noel, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Prine does not appeal her conviction.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM: 

Melissa Prine appeals her thirty-seven month prison

sentence resulting from her conviction for delivery of cocaine base

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2000).* Finding no error,

we affirm.

Prine claims that the district court erred by not

crediting her sentence for seven months of home confinement prior

to her sentence. Contrary to Prine’s claim, time spent on home

confinement with electronic monitoring does not constitute time

served in “official detention” under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (2000).

Randall v. Whelan, 938 F.2d 522, 524 (4th Cir. 1991); United

States v. Insley, 927 F.2d 185, 186 (4th Cir. 1991). Therefore,

the district court properly declined to credit Prine’s sentence.

Accordingly, we affirm Prine’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial statements of Paramark Enterprises,  Inc. as of December
31, 1999 and the fiscal year then ended,  and it is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<NAME>                                            PARAMARK ENTERPRISES, INC.
<CIK>                                             0000915661

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                           195,997
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    847,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      87,500
<INVENTORY>                                                      279,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               1,346,583
<PP&E>                                                         1,117,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   249,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 2,214,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            984,659
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          33,935
<OTHER-SE>                                                       969,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   2,214,547
<SALES>                                                        4,392,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               4,392,570
<CGS>                                                          3,481,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  5,459,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                (68,341)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                18,232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (1,016,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (1,016,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (1,016,694)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.30)


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 557

To permit the State of Texas to use certain previously set-aside funds for

the provision of grants to colonia residents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 18, 1995

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To permit the State of Texas to use certain previously setaside funds for the provision of grants to colonia residents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF SPECIAL REVOLVING FUND FOR

4 GRANTS TO COLONIA RESIDENTS.

5 The 3d proviso under the heading ‘‘Environmental

6 Protection Agency—Construction grants’’ in title III of

7 the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and

8 Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appro9 priations Act, 1990 (Pub. L. 101–144; 103 Stat. 858) is

10 amended—
2

•HR 557 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘or grants’’ after ‘‘loans’’ each

2 place it appears;

3 (2) by striking ‘‘Repayment amounts may’’ and

4 inserting ‘‘Amounts repaid from any such loan

5 may’’; and

6 (3) by striking ‘‘Loans from’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘Loans or grants from’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1763-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1763-DR), dated May 27, 2008, and related determinations. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 6, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 27, 2008. 

Appanoose, Monroe, and Ringgold Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance.) 

Clarke County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance. 

Wayne County for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E8-19009 Filed 8-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
Order entered April 2 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01564 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 01565 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 01566 - CR TRACY REBECCA SIVERT , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial Distr ict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F12 - 61367 - M, F12 - 61732 - M, F12 - 61733 - M 

### O RDER On February 18, 2014, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s records for these appeals within twenty

- one days. To date, w e have not received the clerk’s records. Accordingly, w e ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s records in these appeals within T E N DAYS of the date of this order. If the clerk’s records are not filed within the time specified, the Cou rt will utilize the available remedies to obtain the clerk’s records. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons,Dallas Coun ty District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records

Division; and to counsel for all parties. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### Henry H. Petze, as Trustee of Morse Iron Works and Dry Dock Company, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Charles G. Street, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.