alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 49203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-19126]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Date & Time: Thursday, August 21, 2008, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed: 

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Advisory Opinion 2008-04: Chris Dodd for President, Inc. by Marc E. 
Elias, Esquire, and Brian G. Svoboda, Esquire.

Advisory Opinion 2008-06: Democratic Party of Virginia by Marc E. 
Elias, Esquire, and Caroline P. Goodson, Esquire.

Advisory Opinion 2008-07: Senator David Vitter and Vitter for U.S. 
Senate by Jan Witold Baran, Esquire, and Caleb P. Burns, Esquire.

Advisory Opinion 2008-09: Senator Frank Lautenberg and Lautenberg for 
Senate by Marc Elias, Esquire.
    John McCain 2008, Inc.--Presidential Primary Matching Payment 
Program (LRA 731).
    Management and Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:  Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Mary Dove, Commission Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at 
least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

 Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-19126 Filed 8-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Order filed April 19, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00806

- CR

____________ JARVIS L. BARBER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No

. 7

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2008621



### ORDER
Appellant is represented by retained counsel, Frederick Wilson . No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. On January 20, 2016, Kara Salazar , the court reporter, notified this court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. On February 9, 2016, this court abated the appeal and ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute his appe al and, if so, whether he is indigent and entitled to a free record and appointed counsel

. The trial court held a hearing on February 24, 2016, in which it confirmed appellantis not indigent and has retained Wilson as appellate counsel. At that hearing,

a ppellant, through Wilson , agreed to contact the court reporter and make arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record.
On February 25, 2016, Salazar again no tified this court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. That day, this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). App ellant filed no reply. On April 12, 2016, the court reporter informed this court that appellant has
still not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record.
Accordingly, we ORDER a ppellant’s retained counsel, Frederick Wilson
, to file a brief in this appeal on or before May 19, 2016

. If Wilson does not timely file the brief as ordered, the appeal will be abated for a hearing in the trial court to
determine the reason for the failure to file the brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b) (2).

PER CURIAM
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 480

To amend the Clean Air Act to repeal the mandatory requirement for State

motor vehicle inspection and maintenance programs for ozone nonattainment areas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 11, 1995

Mr. DELAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to repeal the mandatory requirement for State motor vehicle inspection and maintenance

programs for ozone nonattainment areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MANDATORY STATE MOTOR VEHI4 CLE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RE5 QUIREMENT.

6 The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.7401 and following) is

7 amended as follows:
2

•HR 480 IH

1 (1) Section 182(a)(2)(B) is amended to read as

2 follows:

3 ‘‘(B) For any Marginal Area, the State

4 may, but shall not be required to, include in the

5 applicable implementation plan provisions for a

6 vehicle inspection and maintenance program.’’.

7 (2) Section 182(b)(4) is repealed.

8 (3) Section 182(c)(3) is repealed.

Æ
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Company

|NMS Communications Asia Ltd.              |  | Inno Media Logic (I.M.L.) Company     
|----------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|1815-16 Concordia Plaza                   |  | 4200 rue La Periere                   
|1 Science Museum Road                     |  | Saint-Hubert, Quebec                  
|Tsim Sha Tsui East                        |  | Canada J3Y 9G3                        
|Kowloon, Hong Kong                        |  |                                       
|NMS Communications Europe S.A.            |  | NMS Communications Telecom Europe S.A.
|Immeuble Pericles                         |  | Immeuble Pericles                     
|144, Avenue Roger Salengro                |  | 144, Avenue Roger Salengro            
|92370 Chaville, France                    |  | 92370 Chaville, France                
|NMS Communications International, Inc.    |  | NMS Communications Europe, Inc.       
|100 Crossing Boulevard                    |  | 100 Crossing Boulevard                
|Framingham, MA 01702                      |  | Framingham, MA 01702                  
|NMS Communications Securities Corporation |  | Mobilee, Inc.                         
|100 Crossing Boulevard                    |  | 100 Crossing Boulevard                
|Framingham, MA 01702                      |  | Framingham, MA 01702                  

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

METRO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT,

LLC,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL SIAWAY, DEANDRE BEMBRY,

AND JAI WILLIAMS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 143 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of May, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
H. R. 436

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate between fats, oils,

and greases of animal, marine, or vegetable origin, and other oils and greases,

in issuing certain regulations, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Edible Oil Regulatory Reform

Act’’.

SEC. 2. DIFFERENTIATION AMONG FATS, OILS, AND GREASES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection (c), in issuing or enforcing any regulation or establishing any interpretation

or guideline relating to the transportation, storage, discharge,

release, emission, or disposal of a fat, oil, or grease under any

Federal law, the head of that Federal agency shall—

(1) differentiate between and establish separate classes

for—

(A) animal fats and oils and greases, and fish and

marine mammal oils, within the meaning of paragraph

(2) of section 61(a) of title 13, United States Code, and

oils of vegetable origin, including oils from the seeds, nuts,

and kernels referred to in paragraph (1)(A) of that section;

and

(B) other oils and greases, including petroleum; and

(2) apply standards to different classes of fats and oils

based on considerations in subsection (b).

(b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In differentiating between the class of

fats, oils, and greases described in subsection (a)(1)(A) and the

class of oils and greases described in subsection (a)(1)(B), the head

of the Federal agency shall consider differences in the physical,

chemical, biological, and other properties, and in the environmental

effects, of the classes.

(c) EXCEPTION.—The requirements of this Act shall not apply

to the Food and Drug Administration and the Food Safety and

Inspection Service.

(d) FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY.—

(1) Section 1004(a)(1) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33

U.S.C. 2704(a)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘for a tank vessel,’’

and inserting ‘‘for a tank vessel (except a tank vessel on which

the only oil carried as cargo is an animal fat or vegetable

oil, as those terms are used in section 2 of the Edible Oil

Regulatory Reform Act)’’.
H. R. 436—2

(2) Section 1016(a) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33

U.S.C. 2716(a)) is amended in the first sentence by striking

‘‘, in the case of a tank vessel, the responsible party could

be subject under section 1004(a)(1) or (d) of this Act, or to

which, in the case of any other vessel, the responsible party

could be subjected under section 1004(a)(2) or (d)’’ and inserting

‘‘the responsible party could be subjected under section 1004(a)

or (d) of this Act’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                                       
                           RTW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     1995              1996             1997
                                                 ------------      -----------       ------------
<S>                                               <C>               <C>               <C>
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING          10,607,307       11,774,147        11,832,720

STOCK WARRANTS                                         54,944            4,325                 -

STOCK OPTIONS            
    Options at $25.00                                       -               57                 -
    Options at $19.33                                       -            7,013                 -
    Options at $16.67                                     393            1,446                 -
    Options at $12.50                                     684            3,424                 -
    Options at $10.75                                       -                -               919
    Options at $ 8.67                                  19,401           44,254             4,955
    Options at $ 7.13                                       -                -                95
    Options at $ 6.75                                       -                -               357
    Options at $ 2.67                                  61,119           69,619            54,065
    Options at $ 2.00                                 214,521          232,333           186,018
    Options at $ 0.53                                     750                -                 -
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON
    SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING                  10,959,119       12,136,618        12,079,129
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------

NET INCOME ($000'S)                                    $7,058           $8,982            $5,799
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------

INCOME PER SHARE:
    BASIC INCOME PER SHARE                              $0.67            $0.76             $0.49
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------
    DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE                            $0.64            $0.74             $0.48
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------
                                                 -------------     ------------      ------------
</TABLE>
(173 La. 415)

#### MONTGOMERY v. BOUANCHAUD, Sheriff, et al.

No. 31217.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 17, 1931.

Albin Provosty, of New Roads, for appellants.

M. T. Hewes, of New Roads, for appellee.

BRUNOT, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment perpetuating a preliminary injunction restraining the sale of 101.28 acres of land, situated in Pointe Coupee parish, which the court decreed to be paraphernal property of the debt- or’s wife.

J. B. Camors & Co., Inc., were judgment creditors of T. W. Montgomery, the plain-: tiff’s husband. In the liquidation of J. B. Camors & Go., Inc., the - judgment against T. W. Montgomery was assigned to C. E. Roy. After acquiring the judgment, Roy caused a fieri facias to issue thereon, in the name of J. B. Camors & Co., Inc., and seized thereunder the property involved in this suit. It is the sale under this seizure that the judgment enjoins. :

After the appeal was lodged in this court, the appellee discovered .that Roy had caused the issuance of the fi. fa., and the seizure of the property without disclosing his ownership of the judgment, and for that reason filed the motion to dismiss the appeal, which is based upon the ground that the execution issued without the consent of J. B. Camors & Co., Inc.

In answer to this motion C. E. Roy sets forth his acquisition of the judgment by assignment from the liquidator of J. B. Camors & Co., Inc., and appellee, in her brief, says: “The answer of C. E. Roy to the motion to dismiss appeal being considered, mover now formally withdraws and retracts the allegations that the writ of fi. fa. originally issued without the consent of J. B. Camors & Co.”

The transferee of a judgment may cause it to be executed in the name of the original judgment creditor. Zibilich v. Rouseo, 157 La. 936, 103 So. 269; Walker v. Villavaso, 26 La. Ann. 42; Blondín v. Christophe, 13 La. Ann. 325; Hebert v. Dousson, 8 La. Ann. 267.

Eor the foregoing reasons, the motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 540 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 540

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the exclusion for 
      amounts received under group legal services plans permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 1995

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the exclusion for 
      amounts received under group legal services plans permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP 
              LEGAL SERVICES PLANS.

    (a) General Rule.--Subsection (e) of section 120 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Application of Section.--This section shall apply to--
            ``(1) taxable years beginning after December 31, 1976, and 
        before July 1, 1992, and
            ``(2) taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FILED
AS PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   56,231
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         5,190,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      5,518,861
<PP&E>                                                  461,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                          386,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       13,099,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 6,273,522 
<BONDS>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                229,014
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            6,597,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         13,099,980
<SALES>                                              62,594,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     62,594,051
<CGS>                                                57,436,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        57,436,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      5,126,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      712,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (681,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (681,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (681,250)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (    .04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (    .01)

        

</TABLE>
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ HUBBELL INCORPORATED, Appellant,
v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND LEVITON MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Intervenor.

__________________________ 2013-1082

__________________________ On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-739.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Upon consideration of Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc.’s unopposed motion for leave to intervene, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 13-1082 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 12/13/2012HUBBELL INCORPORATED V . ITC 2The motion for leave to intervene is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. F OR T HE C OURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s21 Case: 13-1082 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 12/13/2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      21,542,000
<SECURITIES>                                20,423,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,026,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,025,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,629,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            89,871,000
<PP&E>                                      70,937,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,977,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             144,500,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,672,000
<BONDS>                                     15,206,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       264,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,358,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               144,500,000
<SALES>                                     80,153,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,522,000
<CGS>                                       18,320,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,320,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            92,699,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,558,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (22,055,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   926,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,981,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,981,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)
        

</TABLE>
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Paradigm  Medical  Industries,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for  the period ending December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and  Exchange Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Luis A. Mostacero,  Vice President  Finance,  Treasurer and Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

      (a)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
           the Company.




                                        /s/ Luis A. Mostacero
                                        ------------------------------------
Date: May 15, 2008                      Luis A. Mostacero
                                        Vice President of Finance, Treasurer
                                        and Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------