alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-80462, 33-80568, and 33-80564) pertaining to the Discounted
Stock Option Plan for Directors, 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan and 1993 Stock
Option Plan of Communications Central Inc. of our report dated August 19, 1996
(except for Notes 4 and 13, as to which the date is October 8, 1996) with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Communications
Central Inc. in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1996.


                                            Ernst & Young, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
October 8, 1996
[ J

- 35

- 2020 and J

- 36

- 2020 ]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MOHD NASSER ALKASSMI,

Appellant

v.

KATHY BOOCKVAR, PENNSYLVANIA

SECRETARY OF STATE AND JESSICA MATHIS, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF

ELECTIONS AND NOTARIES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 16 MAP 2020

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 135 MD 2020 dated March 6, 2020

SUBMITTED: March 13, 2020

KELLY ANN RICHARDSON WYATT,

Appellant

v.

KATHY BOOCKVAR, PENNSYLVANIA

SECRETARY OF STATE AND JESSICA MATHIS, DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF

ELECTIONS AND NOTARIES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 17 MAP 2020

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 137 MD 2020 dated March 6, 2020

SUBMITTED: March 13, 2020

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17 th day of March , 2020

, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is

AFFIRMED

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday August 8, 2008.

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC., 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Staff Assistant.

 [FR Doc. E8-18329 Filed 8-5-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 540

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the exclusion for

amounts received under group legal services plans permanent.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 17, 1995

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

the exclusion for amounts received under group legal

services plans permanent.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FOR

4 EMPLOYER-PROVIDED GROUP LEGAL SERV5 ICES PLANS.

6 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subsection (e) of section 120

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read

8 as follows:

9 ‘‘(e) APPLICATION OF SECTION.—This section shall

10 apply to—
2

•HR 540 IH

1 ‘‘(1) taxable years beginning after December

2 31, 1976, and before July 1, 1992, and

3 ‘‘(2) taxable years beginning after December

4 31, 1994.’’

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

7 December 31, 1994.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RIVIERA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., No. 09-11380

Plaintiff, District Judge Patrick J. Duggan

v. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

RDI OF MICHIGAN, LLC,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

Defendant RDI of Michigan, LLC’s motion for enlargement of page limit for reply

brief [Docket #125] is GRANTED. Defendant may file a reply brief regarding its motion

to amend counterclaim and file third party complaint, not to exceed 15 pages. The reply

brief shall be filed no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 8, 2010.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: June 7, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served on the attorneys

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on June 7, 2010.

S/Gina Wilson 

Judicial Assistant
#### Charlotte F. Hillsburgh, Respondent, v. Catharine L. Purroy, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned officers of Bancorp Energy, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, in the capacities of each indicated by their signature, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010  (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 8, 2011/s/  Dempsey MorkDempsey Mork, Chief Executive Officer
(the Principal Executive Officer)  Date: August 8, 2011/s/  Neville PearsonNeville Pearson, Chief Financial Officer
(the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)


| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  |
EXHIBIT
      32.1










CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO ****





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Classic Costume Company, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, E.
      Todd
      Owens, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Classic Costume Company, Inc. and will be retained by Classic Costume Company,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





June
                19, 2007
            /s/E.
                Todd OwensE.
                Todd OwensChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Raymond M. HAMILTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Walter E. CRAVEN, Warden, Defendant-Appellant (two cases).

Nos. 71-2737, 71-2844.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1973.

Sanford Svetcov, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), W. Eric Collins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert L. Ashby, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Emil Roy Eisenhardt (argued), Lee Van Boven, of Farella, Braun & Martel, San Francisco, Cal., Michael E. Smith, Berkeley, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge. Hamilton v. Craven, 350 F.Supp. 1251 (N.D.Cal.1971). We do not reach other issues raised by appellant or by appellee on the cross-appeal.

Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 33-80147 and 333-52044) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option Plan,
1994 Director's Stock Option Plan and Directors' Warrants and 2000 Directors'
Stock Option Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan of SigmaTron
International, Inc. of our report dated June 29, 2001, except for the third
paragraph of note R, as to which the date is July 11, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows and schedule of SigmaTron International, Inc. and our report dated June
29, 2001 with respect to the statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash
flows and schedule of SMT Unlimited, L.P. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) of SigmaTron International, Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2003.


                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG

Chicago, Illinois
July 17, 2003
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 3.2.2

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                                    BYLAWS OF
                             SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.


         The Bylaws of Summit Properties Inc., a Maryland corporation, are
hereby amended as follows:

         1. Section 4.1. Section 4.1 of the Bylaws is hereby amended by deleting
the first sentence thereof and substituting therefor the following:

                  "The Company shall have a Chairman of the Board or Co-Chairmen
of the Board, a President, one or more Vice Presidents, one or more Chief
Operating Officers, a Secretary, a Treasurer, and such Assistant Secretaries and
Treasurers and subordinate officers as the Board of Directors, or any committee
or officer appointed by the Board of Directors for such purpose, may from time
to time elect."

         2. Section 4.4. Section 4.4 of the Bylaws is hereby amended by deleting
such section in its entirety and substituting therefor the following:

                  "Section 4.4 Chairman of the Board. The Board of Directors
shall appoint a Chairman of the Board or Co-Chairmen of the Board. Each Chairman
of the Board shall be a Director and may preside over the meetings of the
Stockholders and the Board of Directors. Each Chairman of the Board shall
perform such other duties as may be assigned to him by the President or the
Board of Directors. Each Chairman of the Board may sign and execute any deed,
mortgage, bond, contract, or other obligation or instrument on behalf of the
Company, except in cases where the execution thereof shall be expressly
delegated by the Board of Directors or by the Charter, these Bylaws or otherwise
to another officer or agent of the Company. If the Board of Directors appoints
Co-Chairmen of the Board, then any reference in these Bylaws to the Chairman of
the Board shall mean the Co-Chairmen of the Board and each of them singly,
unless limited by statute, the Charter or these Bylaws."


         The foregoing is certified as the First Amendment to the Bylaws of
Summit Properties Inc. as adopted by the Board of Directors on December 13,
1999.



                                          /s/ Michael G. Malone, Esq.
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Michael G. Malone, Esq.,
                                          Secretary
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-17-00440-CV

SHEIK TEHUTI, Appellant

V.

HA TO TU, Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2017-006596-1)

March 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittman

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed as moot.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                       FIRST FORTIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of First Fortis Life Insurance Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert B. Pollock, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: March 29, 2004

                                                 /s/ Robert B. Pollock
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Robert B. Pollock
                                                 President and Chief Executive
                                                 Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 1996)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1618]








FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, February 1, 1996.

PLACE: Room 6005, 6th Floor, 1730 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following:

    1. U.S. Steel Mining Co., Inc., Docket No. WEVA 92-783. (Issues 
include whether the judge erred in concluding that the operator's 
violation of a transportation safeguard issued under 30 C.F.R. 
Sec. 75.1403 was significant and substantial.)

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Jean Ellen (202) 653-5629/(202) 708-9300 
for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

    Dated: January 22, 1996.
Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 96-1618 Filed 1-24-96; 3:35 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
Opinion issued September 26, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00698-CV

———————————

IN RE YOUNG HWANG AND VIC K-INTERNATIONAL 

CORPORATION, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Young Hwang and Vic K-International Corporation, filed a petition 

for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s “oral ruling on May 9, 2024, 

partially granting [r]elators’ objections and motion to strike jury demand” of real 

party in interest, Minjeong Kim.1 Relators further challenge the trial court’s denial 

1 The underlying case is Young Hwang and Vic K-International Corp. v. Minjeong 

Kim, Cause No. 21-DCV-284317, in the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County, 

Texas, the Honorable Surrendran K. Patel presiding.
2

of their motion for reconsideration of the oral ruling regarding their objections and 

motion to strike jury demand, which relators state was memorialized by the trial 

court in an August 27, 2024 notation on the trial court’s docket sheet. Relators’

mandamus petition requests that this Court “issue a writ of mandamus directing [the 

trial court] to vacate [its] rulings of May 9, 2024 and August 27, 2024, [and to] 

require that the trial of all claims and causes of action in the underlying cause be 

tried to the bench.” 

In connection with their petition for writ of mandamus, relators filed a 

“Motion for Emergency Stay of Underlying Case Pending Writ of Manda[mus].” In 

their motion, relators requested that the Court stay the underlying trial court 

proceedings, specifically the September 24, 2024 trial setting. On September 18, 

2024, the Court denied relators’ “Motion for Emergency Stay of Underlying Case 

Pending Writ of Manda[mus].”

The Court denies relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Goodman and Guerra.
#### In the Matter of the Application of John W. Hotaling, Appellant, for Discharge on a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Clara A. Hotaling, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
#### In the Matter of Edmond Pena, Petitioner, v Glenn Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[678 NYS2d 306]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to the unauthorized use of controlled substances and failing to comply with temporary release programming rules and regulations in violation of prison disciplinary rules after petitioner’s urine tested positive for both opiates and cannabinoids. Petitioner now challenges the determination of his guilt contending that the Hearing Officer should not have presided over the hearing because he interviewed petitioner (albeit on another matter) and requested that petitioner submit a urine specimen. Inasmuch as petitioner failed to raise this issue at the administrative hearing when the appropriate remedial action could have been taken, this issue has not been preserved for our review *(see, Matter of Guerrero v Coombe,*239 AD2d 676). In any event, were we to consider this issue, we would find no bias on the part of the Hearing Officer given petitioner’s plea of guilty to the charges contained in the misbehavior report *(see, Matter of Washington v Goord,*245 AD2d 914).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1
 
 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-24669, 33-93540, 333-75704, 333-93923, 333-83781, 333-75704, and 333-60436 of Summit Properties Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-88202, 333-78 and 333-79897 of Summit Properties Inc. on Form S-8, of our report dated March 4, 2004, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets, on January 1, 2002, the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , on January 1, 2003, and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities , as amended by Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) on July 1, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Summit Properties Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.
 
 
 /S/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
 Charlotte, North Carolina
 March 12, 2004
#### Nelson Stickles, as Administrator, etc., of Nelson Stickles, Jr., Deceased, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
#### BOYKIN v. PLAUCHE et al.

No. 1619.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 30, 1936.

For former opinion, see 168 So. 741.

McCoy, King & Jones, of Lake Charles, for appellant.

Clement M. Moss and Vance Plauche, both of Lake Charles, for appellees.

LE BLANC, Judge.

In their application for rehearing, defendants-appellees complain of the opinion and decree herein which rejected their plea of contributory negligence and imposed liability on them, and also of the quantum of damages allowed, which they contend is exceedingly high.

We have carefully reconsidered the issue of contributory negligence and remain convinced that the opinion and judgment on the question of liability is correct.

With regard to the amount of damages allowed, we endeavored to make it plain that there was more than the loss of love and affection and of companionship involved in' this case. More than sorrow and mental anguish also. Considerable stress was placed on the question of the sole and only support the plaintiff had to look to in this son who is now lost to her.

However, we failed perhaps in considering the demand for loss of love and companionship, to give sufficient attention to the fact that this is a case where only one of the parents is asking for damages, and for that reason, we have decided to amend the decree by reducing the amount allowed by the sum of $1,000.

It is now ordered that the decree herein handed down on June 9, 1936, be, and the same is hereby, amended by reducing the amount as therein stated from the sum of $9,780 to the sum of $8,780, and it is further ordered-that the application for rehearing be and the same is hereby refused.