alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 632 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 632

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 632

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUST COMPENSATION.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end of the first paragraph the following: 
``Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner's 
reasonable costs, including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and 
attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent 
inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no more than 
500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or 
manufacture of the patented invention by or for the United States. 
Reasonable and entire compensation described in the preceding sentence 
shall not be paid from amounts available under section 1304 of title 
31, but shall be payable subject to such extent or in such amounts as 
are provided in annual appropriations Acts.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to actions under section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, 
that are pending on, or brought on or after, January 1, 1995.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 12, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightning Gaming, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian
Haveson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and I, Robert Ciunci, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350  that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant at the dates and for the periods
  indicated.




A
signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.





Date: 
November 14, 2008




By: 
/s/ Brian Haveson




Brian
Haveson


Chief
Executive Officer








Date: 
November 14, 2008




By: 
/s/ Robert Ciunci




Robert
Ciunci


Chief
Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DYWON LEVER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 09-13657

HONORABLE NANCY G. EDMUNDS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING THE HABEAS PETITION AND CLOSING THIS CASE

Petitioner Dywon Lever has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Petitioner is confined at the St. Clair County Correctional and Detention Center in Port Huron,

Michigan. His habeas petition challenges a federal indictment that has been filed against

Petitioner. See United States v. Lever, 2:08-cv-20500-1 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2008). Petitioner

alleges that the Court and other agents of the United States have unlawfully taken him into

custody and deprived him of his freedom without due process of law. Petitioner contends that he

was forced to appear before the Court and to sign an appearance bond. He maintains that the

Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction of him, as no criminal complaint or charges have been

lawfully filed against him. He seeks an order setting aside the indictment, dismissing the

allegations against him, and releasing him from custody.

Petitioner is not entitled to habeas corpus relief because all his claims relate to the

pending criminal charges and can be raised in his criminal case. Garey v. Fed. Det. Ctr., Miami,

180 Fed. Appx. 118, 119-21 (11th Cir. 2006). The appropriate remedy for a federal pretrial

detainee who is asserting violations of his constitutional rights is to file pretrial motions in the

2:09-cv-13657-NGE-DAS Doc # 2 Filed 10/06/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 60
2

criminal case, not a habeas corpus petition. Id. An adequate and unexhausted remedy is

available to Petitioner in the criminal case. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus

[Dkt. #1] is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: October 6, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

October 6, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-13657-NGE-DAS Doc # 2 Filed 10/06/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 61
##### 



Exhibit 10.16
 Description of Reinsurance Agreements for 2007 between
ACIC, BCIC and Swiss Reinsurance Corporation, General Reinsurance
Corporation and Max Re Ltd. effective January 1, 2007
  LIABILITY OF THE REINSURER
  Loss Layer
    
    Reinsurer
    
    Comment$800,000 excess of $200,000
    
    65 % Swiss Reinsurance Corporation
    
    All business written by the Company.35% Max Re Ltd.
    
    Recoveries from the
MN WCRA will inure
to the benefit of
this treaty$9,000,000 excess $1,000,000
    
    50% Swiss Reinsurance Corporation
    
    Non Minnesota losses.50% General Reinsurance Corporation$10,000,000 excess
$10,000,000
    
    100% General Reinsurance Corporation
    
    Non Minnesota losses.
Net loss for any one
employee shall not
exceed $10,000,000Excess of $20,000,000
    
    
    
    Non Minnesota losses
100% retained by
ACIC and BCIC
 COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION
   REINSURANCE PREMIUM
II

Calendar No. 175

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 584

[Report No. 104–131]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 5), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AUGUST 7 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a fish

hatchery to the State of Iowa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF THE FAIRPORT NATIONAL

4 FISH HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF IOWA.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Within 180 days after the date

6 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

7 shall convey to the State of Iowa without reimbursement

8 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and
2

HR 584 RS

1 to the fish hatchery described in subsection (b) for use

2 by the State for purposes of fishery resources manage3 ment.

4 (b) HATCHERY DESCRIBED.—The fish hatchery de5 scribed in subsection (a) is the Fairport National Fish

6 Hatchery located in Muscatine County, Iowa, adjacent to

7 State Highway 22 west of Davenport, Iowa, including all

8 real property, improvements to real property, and personal

9 property.

10 (c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The prop11 erty conveyed to the State of Iowa pursuant to this section

12 shall be used by the State for purposes of fishery resources

13 management, and if it is used for any other purpose all

14 right, title, and interest in and to all property conveyed

15 pursuant to this section shall revert to the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 175

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 584

[Report No. 104–131]

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a

fish hatchery to the State of Iowa.

AUGUST 7 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 99.1

                              [Company Letterhead]

                                 June 12, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza

Washington, DC  20549

         Re:      CONFIRMATION OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN REPRESENTATIONS

      This letter confirms that Arch Wireless Communications, Inc. has received
from Arthur Andersen LLP, the independent public accountant engaged by the
company to examine the company's financial statements that are included in the
Form 10-K/A to which this letter is filed as an exhibit, a representation letter
addressed to the company and stating that:

      o  the audit conducted by Andersen was subject to Andersen's quality
         control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
         reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
         with professional standards; and

      o  there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on
         audits, availability of national office consultation and availability
         of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant
         portions of the audit.

                                Very truly yours,

                                ARCH WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                By: /S/ J. ROY POTTLE
                                   -----------------------
                                   Name: J. Roy Pottle
                                   Title:  Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1
------------







          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
          --------------------------------------------------------


The Board of Trustees
AMLI Residential Properties Trust:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-89594, 333-89598, 333-89622, 333-08813, and 333-
08815) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-83923, 333-74300, 333-70076, 333-65503,
333-57327, 333-24433, 333-08819, 33-93120, 33-89508, and 333-110669) of
AMLI Residential Properties Trust of our reports dated March 9, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of AMLI Residential Properties
Trust as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related
financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual
report on Form 10-K of AMLI Residential Properties Trust.






                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2005
#### E. R. Carpenter v. State

No. 25511.

November 21, 1951.

Hon. A. A. Dawson, Judge Presiding.

No attorney for defendant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Receiving and concealing stolen property is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

*462The indictment alleged, in effect, that appellant on or about October 7, 1949, received from Thurman Gilley and did fraudulently conceal certain property, to wit: 2 tractor tires of the aggregate value of $51, belonging to and stolen from Floyd Hayes, appellant knowing that the property had been so acquired.

It will be noted that the tires are described in the indictment only in general terms, there being no allegation as to the size or other descriptive averments.

A necessary element of the offense charged is a showing of the acquisition of the property by theft. The sufficiency of the evidence to show this element of the offense is challenged.

James F. Hays, testifying for the state, testified that in October of 1949, there were stolen off his tractor while it was stored in a shed at his farm in Kaufman County, among other things, the two rear tires, the reasonable cash market value of which was around forty-five or fifty dollars each.

Whether this witness was the one and same person and also known as Floyd Hayes, the name of the alleged owner as stated in the indictment, is not shown, nor did the witness give any description of the tires stolen — that is, the size or make.

Thurman Gilley testified that during the month of October, 1949, he stripped a Ford tractor in Kaufman County, taking, among other things therefrom, the two back tires which he subsequently delivered to and hid in appellant’s barn; that about a week later appellant paid him fifty dollars for the stolen property.

Peace officers, accompanied by Gilley, went to the appellant’s barn and Gilley there showed them the tires he had stolen, hidden under some hay in the barn.

What became of the tires that were recovered is not disclosed by the record.

There is no testimony that either Floyd Hayes, the alleged owner named in the indictment, or James F. Hays, who testified in the case, identified the tires which were recovered as the tires that were stolen. The evidence furnishes no description of the tires that were stolen by which it could be said that *463the tires that were recovered were the stolen tires. Moreover, Gilley was an accomplice witness and there is an utter absence of any corroborating testimony that the tires he said he sold and delivered to appellant were, in fact, stolen tires.

The insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is apparent in the particulars mentioned.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 652

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide a grant to the Board

of Directors of the George Washington Boyhood Home Foundation for

the stabilization, preservation, and interpretation of the archeological

resources and visual integrity of Ferry Farm, boyhood home of George

Washington, America’s first President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mr. BATEMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to provide a grant

to the Board of Directors of the George Washington

Boyhood Home Foundation for the stabilization, preservation, and interpretation of the archeological resources

and visual integrity of Ferry Farm, boyhood home of

George Washington, America’s first President.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 652 IH

1 SECTION 1. GRANT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE

2 GEORGE WASHINGTON BOYHOOD HOME

3 FOUNDATION.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act5 ing through the Director of the National Park Service,

6 shall, to the extent amounts are provided in appropriations

7 Act, provide a grant to the Board of Directors of the

8 George Washington Boyhood Home Foundation, upon ap9 plication by the Board to the Secretary not later than one

10 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.

11 (b) USE OF GRANT.—The grant provided under sub12 section (a) may be used only for the stabilization, preser13 vation, and interpretation of the architectural and archae14 ological resources of Ferry Farm, boyhood home of George

15 Washington in Stafford County, Virginia.

16 (c) REPORT.—The Board of Directors of the George

17 Washington Boyhood Home Foundation, shall submit to

18 the Secretary of Interior, for each fiscal year in which the

19 Board expends any portion of the grant provided under

20 subsection (a), a report describing the use of the portion

21 spent during that year and any other information the Sec22 retary determines to be appropriate.

23 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

24 authorized to be appropriated not more than $750,000 for
3

HR 652 IH

1 the grant under subsection (a) and such funds may remain

2 available until expended.

Æ
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00211-CR

__________________

EX PARTE LENNON CLARK

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 22DC-WR-00789

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Lennon Clark filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. SeeTex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). 

Clark and his attorney signed the motion. See id. 

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See id. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 2, 2022

Opinion Delivered August 3, 2022

Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-74660, 33-74662, 33-74664, 33-78406, 33-88780,333-04268, 333-22973, 333-22975, 333-24545, 333-56359, 333-56361,333-73409,333-73411, 333-33114, 333-33116, 333-56790, 333-56792, 333-33110, 333-82790, 333-82808, 333-103299, 333-113083, and 333-123433) of MapInfo Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated December 5, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Albany, New York
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.10

                               INTERIM SERVICES INC.
                        OUTSIDE DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION PLAN
                                    July 1, 1998

Outside directors of the Company shall receive an annual retainer.  The annual
retainer shall be determined by the Board of Directors at the regularly
scheduled meeting of the directors coinciding with the annual meeting of the
stockholders of the Company, and such annual retainer shall be effective for the
twelve month period commencing on the next July 1st.  The Board of Directors may
designate the manner in which the annual retainer shall be payable including,
but not limited to, in cash, in shares of the Company's common stock or in any
combination thereof.  Further, the Board of Directors may permit up to fifty
percent (50%) of the annual retainer to be deferred and paid to the directors in
the form of stock units, after a plan permitting such deferral and issuance of
stock units is adopted by the Company.  Effective July 1, 1998, the annual
retainer payable to each outside director shall be $25,000, payable in cash.

Compensation for directors' attendance at meetings of the directors and/or board
committee meetings shall be determined by the Board of Directors at the
regularly scheduled meeting of the directors coinciding with the annual meeting
of the stockholders of the Company, and such compensation shall be effective for
the twelve month period commencing on the next July 1st.  Effective July 1,
1998, attendance at meetings of the directors shall be compensated at the rate
of $2,000 per meeting, payable in cash.  Effective July 1, 1998, attendance at
board committee meetings shall be compensated at the rate of $1,500 per meeting,
payable in cash.  

Pursuant to the Company's 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, each outside director shall
receive an annual stock option grant to purchase 4,000 shares of the Company's
common stock, vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant.  The annual
stock option grant shall be made on the date coinciding with the annual meeting
of stockholders of the Company.

Outside directors shall be reimbursed for expenses incurred by them in
connection with their service as directors of the Company.

This Plan shall remain in effect until amended or terminated by the Board of
Directors.
#### George A. Schusler, as Administrator, etc., of Louis Schusler, Deceased, Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

Motion denied.
Exhibit 10.29

CONSULTING AGREEMENT  BETWEEN  SAMSONITE EUROPE N.V.  AND  MARCELLO BOTTOLI

---

THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE ON THIS 3rd day of March, 2004

BETWEEN:

NOW THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1.0   APPOINTMENT

2.0   SERVICES

3.0   CONSULTING FEE AND BENEFITS

4.0   CONFIDENTIALITY

---



5.0   DUTY OF CARE

6.0   TERM

7.0   MISCELLANEOUS

8.0   GOVERNING LAW

2

---

9.0   NOTICES

All notices or other correspondence arising under this Agreement shall be duly delivered or sent by registered post to:

Notices
to Consultant:



Notices
to the Company:



With
a copy to:



With
an addiiton copy to:



or
such other person and address as the parties shall notify the other in writing or vice versa from time to time.

*
* * * *

3

---

IN WITNESSwhereof this Agreement has been executed on the date first above written.

| |  | SAMSONITE EUROPE N.V.
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      
| |  |                      
| |  | By:                  
| |  |                      
| |  |                      
| |  | MARCELLO BOTTOLI     

4

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of John R. Heinzelman.

Reference ordered. Settle order on notice.
Order filed, September 04, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00707

- CR

____________ STEVEN BERNELL PEN TON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 65544

- A



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 28, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. B ecause the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Robin Rios , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM