alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
      Line
      Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Richard N. Marshall, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      RICHARD N. MARSHALL


Name: Richard
      N. Marshall


Title:
      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
      November 9, 2006














This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
Exhibit 10.21


 





 


Nov 19th, 2018


 


To:


Micronet Ltd


Att: Mr. David Markus, Micronet CEO


 


	 	RE:	Micronet Ltd (“Micronet”) - Financial backing


 


Reference is made to your
request made to MICT Inc. (“MICT”) dated November 19 2018 in connection with the financial backing required to Micronet
in support of its cash flow and working capital needs.


 


Pursuant to the resolution
of the board of Directors of MICT, the undersigned confirms that MICT has agreed to assume the obligation and extend Micronet with
a funding in the total amount of up to USD 250,000 (“the Funding”).


 


The Funding shall be made
available to Micronet as follows:


 


(a) In the event Micronet
shall independently secure funding from third parties in any form (such as by way of equity or loan or any combination thereof),
MICT shall participate in such funding and extend the funding in such portion based on its pro rata holdings in Micronet (up to
the Funding amount) and pursuant to the same terms conditions secured by Micronet vis a vis the applicable funding third parties;


 


Or, at the alternative
of Micronet,


 


(b) the Funding will be
extended either in a form of a loan, equity, convertible loan combined with certain warrants coverage or a firm commitment to provide
Micronet with a guaranty securing its loans or any combination of the above. Under this alternative, the final and formal structure
of Funding shall be determined and agreed by the parties pursuant to good faith negotiations to be completed by no later than December
15th 2018.


 


It is agreed that if the
Funding will be in a form of a loan then Micronet shall pay back such loan not before January 1 2020 but no later than December
31, 2020.


 


	Sincerely, 	 
	 	 
	Mict Inc 	 
	 	 
	/s/ David Lucatz	 
	David Lucatz, CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated audited financial statements for the year ending 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,024
<SECURITIES>                                     5,898
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,003
<ALLOWANCES>                                       779
<INVENTORY>                                      9,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,518
<PP&E>                                          22,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,327
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,638
<SALES>                                         76,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,529
<CGS>                                           28,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,658
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,195)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,868)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (2) The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| Date:      August 14, 2009 | By:  | /s/ Min      Zhao                                              |
|----------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |      | Min      Zhao                                                       |
|                       |      | Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer            |
|                       |      | (Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial  Officer) |
#### Graham *v.*Graham.

(No. 23444

Decided March 30, 1932.)

*Mr. Raymond F. Murray,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Howard M. Razor,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the *631reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual
Report of Protection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.  (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the
year  ended December 31, 2002 (the
Report), which this certification accompanies, Richard Ginsburg, in my capacity
as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, and Darius G. Nevin,
in my capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Companies, certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Companies.   Date:
  April
  11, 2003
  By:
  /s/
  Richard GinsburgRichard
  Ginsburg,President
  and Chief Executive Officer   Date:
  April
  11, 2003
  By:
  /s/
  Darius G. NevinDarius
  G. Nevin,Executive
  Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer   The forgoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Companies as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
----

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 13, 2011 | /s/ Dana C. Gavenda                   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                          | Dana C. Gavenda                       |
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer |

| Date:  May 13, 2011 | /s/ Kevin D. Maroney                                 |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Kevin D. Maroney                                     |
|                          | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                            RTW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                  STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME
                     PER COMMON AND COMMON SHARE EQUIVALENT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                   1994                1995                1996
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------
<S>                                          <C>                 <C>                 <C>
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
   OUTSTANDING, UNADJUSTED                         8,118,287          10,607,307          11,774,147


STOCK WARRANTS                                        90,099              54,944               4,325


STOCK OPTIONS
   Options at $25.00                                       -                   -                  57
   Options at $19.33                                       -                   -               7,013
   Options at $16.67                                       -                 393               1,446
   Options at $12.50                                       -                 684               3,424
   Options at $ 8.67                                       -              19,401              44,160
   Options at $ 8.00                                  57,606                   -                   -
   Options at $ 2.67                                       -              61,119              69,619
   Options at $ 2.00                                 219,919             343,233             352,642
   Options at $ 0.53                                   1,227                 750                   -
   Options at $ 0.40                                  16,516                   -                   -
   Options at $ 0.22                                  13,241                   -                   -
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON AND COMMON
   SHARE EQUIVALENTS OUTSTANDING                   8,516,895          11,087,831          12,256,833
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------

NET INCOME ($000'S)                                   $4,195              $7,058              $8,982
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------

NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON
   SHARE EQUIVALENT                                    $0.49               $0.64               $0.73
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------
                                             ---------------     ---------------     ---------------
</TABLE>
**Exhibit      21**

| Parent                                 |   | Subsidiary                                       |   | Percentage                  of Ownership |   | State                  of Incorporation or Organization |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| AMB                  Financial Corp.   |   | American                  Savings, FSB           |   | 100%                                     |   | Federal                                                 |
|                                   |   |                                             |   |                                     |   |                                                    |
| American                  Savings, FSB |   | NIFCO,                  Inc.                     |   | 100%                                     |   | Indiana                                                 |
|                                   |   |                                             |   |                                     |   |                                                    |
| NIFCO,                  Inc.           |   | Ridge                  Management, Inc.          |   | 100%                                     |   | Indiana                                                 |
|                                   |   |                                             |   |                                     |   |                                                    |
| AMB                  Financial Corp.   |   | AMB                  Financial Statutory Trust I |   | 100%                                     |   | Connecticut                                             |

----
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2427

_____________________________

D.E.T., Father of G.A.T., a 

Minor Child,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Steven C. Warrick, Judge.

February 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs., 843 So. 2d 

898 (Fla. 2003) (approving procedure that includes dismissal 

when, after counsel withdraws, the appellant fails to timely file his 

or her own brief in support of appeal of termination of parental 

rights).

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

D.E.T., pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee; Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, 

and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad 

Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-31259

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JENEALIOUS T. JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:04-50049

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jenealious T. Johnson appeals his conditional guilty-plea

conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that the district

court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized by

state probation and parole officers on the day of his arrest,

because the search by the officers violated his federal and state

constitutional rights.
No. 04-31259

-2-

After Johnson allowed the probation officers into his

residence, one of the officers observed a small baggie commonly

used to package illegal narcotics. When the officer asked

Johnson if he would test positive for illegal drugs that day, he

said he would. Accordingly, Johnson conceded to the officers

that he had violated a condition of his probation and, based on

that statement and the empty baggie in the living room, the

officers had reasonable suspicion that drugs or drug

paraphernalia would be found in the residence. See LA. CODE.

CRIM. PRO. art. 895; United States v. Keith, 375 F.3d 346, 349-50

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 367 (2004). The search of

Johnson’s residence did not violate the Fourth Amendment. See

Keith, 375 F.3d at 349-50. Further, assuming that the evidence

seized on the day of Johnson’s arrest was seized from his

brother’s bedroom and assuming, as Johnson asserts, that his

brother’s room was inaccessible to him, Johnson has no standing

to bring a Fourth Amendment challenge to the search of his

brother’s room. See United States v. Wilson, 36 F.3d 1298, 1302

(5th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Phillips, 382 F.3d

489, 496-97 (5th Cir. 2004).

Finally, although Johnson argues that the search violated

his state constitutional rights, the reasonableness of the search

under the Fourth Amendment is not dependent upon state law. 

United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 766 (5th Cir. 1993); see

also United States v. Walker, 960 F.2d 409, 415 (5th Cir. 1992).

Accordingly, Johnson’s conviction is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                       
                         1998 GAIN SHARING BONUS PLAN


All employees of the company are eligible to receive annual cash bonuses 
based on annual results.  The components used to determine the ultimate bonus 
payment are as follows:

IN FORCE PREMIUM         In force premium is the annualized total premiums in
                         effect at any one point in time.

NET INCOME               Pre-tax, pre-bonus operating profit.

Targets were established for each of the identified components above based on 
the 1998 business plan goals.  The amount of the bonus payment is determined 
based on actual performance compared to the established Gain Sharing Bonus 
Plan targets.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

             In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MapInfo Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, D. Joseph Gersuk, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

             (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
**Exhibit 10.39**

**Description of 2006Incentive Compensation Plan**

The Compensation Committee of theBoard of Directors of Remington approved the 2006 Incentive Compensation Plan (the“2006 Plan”) at its March 23, 2006 meeting. The 2006 Plan is for theCompany’s officers and certain other employees and is based on the performance of theCompany compared to performance targets for 2006 approved by the Board of Directors. The2006 Plan provides for eligible participants to earn incentive compensation upon theCompany achieving 100% of the performance target, with increases in the portion of thepotential incentive compensation earned with higher performance of the Company. Noincentive compensation will be payable if the Company fails to achieve the minimumperformance target. The unit of measure for the Company is EBITDA (Earnings BeforeInterest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) as adjusted for certain non-recurring orunusual transactions. The 2006 Plan calls for the payment of earned incentive compensationby the end of the Company’s first quarter 2007.