alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO**

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

I, Juhani Taskinen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of PRINCETON SECURITY TECHNOLGOIES, INC.**;**

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors, any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

**6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.**

**Date: November 12, 2007****/s/ Juhani Taskinen**

**Juhani Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer**
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.cc
Polaris
Highway 55 
Medina, MN  55340-9770                                                                                                                                                                                                    
763-542-0500
James P. Williams
Jim.Williams@Polaris.com
763-525-7701




December 6, 2019




LETTER AGREEMENT
Dear Chris:


We are pleased that you have agreed to transition to the role of Senior Vice President, Electrification Strategy, reporting directly to Scott Wine and working at his direction. Your annual base salary will remain $557,000 for 2020 with benefits at the B1 officer level. The amount of your 2019 annual incentive payment, if any, will be at the discretion of the compensation committee.  
 
We agree that if you leave Polaris, you will be owed severance under your November 6, 2017 severance agreement and that your November 6, 2017 restricted stock unit grant will vest. However, as we have discussed, the severance payable to you under section 3(a) of that severance agreement will be reduced by any gross base salary payable to you after December 9, 2019. We agree that we will use your actual 2018 annual incentive to calculate any severance payable to you under your severance agreement. As a reminder, as set out in your severance agreement, you are required to sign a release when you leave Polaris to receive the additional severance benefits under your agreement.


Please let me know if you have any questions. 
 
Sincerely,


__/s/James P. Williams_______________
James P. Williams
Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer
 


Accepted and agreed on this 9th day of December 2019.
 
 
_/s/Christopher S. Musso____________
Christopher S. Musso
EXHIBIT 32.1.


Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Juhani Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer, and Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting Officer, of Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period May 31, 2010, of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Dated: August 16, 2010
 By: /s/ Juhani Taskinen


Juhani Taskinen
 Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ Trupti Mehta


Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting Officer


* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,249
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,122
<INVENTORY>                                     27,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,427
<PP&E>                                         192,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,828
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,123
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,961
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,828
<SALES>                                         67,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,393
<CGS>                                           44,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 22, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-10974

Conference Calendar

 

CHARLES WILBURN SAMPLES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LESLIE WOODS, Warden Allred Unit; KENNETH R. BRIGHT,

Major; TIMOTHY TALLMAN, Correctional Officer III; LADONNA

MITCHELL, Correctional Officer III; THOMAS KIRBY, 

Correctional Officer III; KENNETH LATHAM, Sergeant; MARK

E. ADKINS, Lieutenant; JAMES W. HART, JR., Captain; NFN 

SMITH, Property Officer; DEBRA SIZEMORE, Correctional 

Officer; JESSE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; BRIAN A. POLLOCK,

Correctional Officer; ERNEST D. IVEY, Disciplinary Hearing

Officer; CHERYL D. BERGER, Unit Grievance Coordinator; ALVIN L.

EASTERLING, Unit Grievance Coordinator; BELINDA GENTRY, Open

Records Coordinator; HERMON DIDLO, Psychology Dr.; JOHN WOMBLE,

Dr.; NFN KING, Correctional Officer; PAMELA FRENCH, Correctional

Officer; JOHN WIRTZ, Sergeant; DAVID LAMBERT, Sergeant,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:01-CV-31-R

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Wilburn Samples, a Texas prisoner (# 683547),

challenges the district court’s denial of his application to
No. 02-10974

-2-

proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal following the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

frivolous, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Samples is

effectively challenging the district court’s certification that

he should not be granted IFP status because his appeal is not

taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th

Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED. R. APP. P. 24(a). 

By failing to direct his motion solely to the district

court’s reasons for the certification decision, however, Samples

has effectively abandoned the only issue that is properly before

this court. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; Yohey v. Collins, 985

F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, Samples’ request

for IFP status is DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as

frivolous. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous and the dismissal

of the complaint as frivolous by the district court both count

as “strikes” for purposes of the “three strikes” provision,

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388

(5th Cir. 1996). Samples is cautioned that if he accumulates

three strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed IFP in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; THREE-STRIKES BAR

WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Asher Zwebner, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Suspect Detection Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the quarter ended June30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date: August 17 , 2010By:
/s/ Asher ZwebnerName:
Asher ZwebnerTitle:
Chief Financial Officer and Director

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TONIA SCOTT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 57 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of September , 2023, the Application for Extraordinary

Jurisdiction and the Application to Expedite are DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Protection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. (the "Companies") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), which this certification accompanies, I, Richard Ginsburg, in my capacity as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Companies, certify that to the best of my knowledge the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.

|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /s/RICHARD GINSBURGRichard Ginsburg                                                                   |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer,
Protection One, Inc. and Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Companies as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,295,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    4,433,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,930,000
<PP&E>                                         208,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,304,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       15,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14,287,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,420,000
<SALES>                                        10,319,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,319,000
<CGS>                                          5,369,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,007,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               31,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             259,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                22,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 483

AN ACT

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit

medicare select policies to be offered in all States, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEDICARE SELECT POLICIES TO

4 BE OFFERED IN ALL STATES FOR AN EX5 TENDED PERIOD.

6 Section 4358(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcili7 ation Act of 1990, as amended by section 172(a) of the

8 Social Security Act Amendments of 1994, is amended to

9 read as follows:
2

HR 483 EH

1 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—(1) The amendments made

2 by this section shall only apply—

3 ‘‘(A) in 15 States (as determined by the Sec4 retary of Health and Human Services) and such

5 other States as elect such amendments to apply to

6 them, and

‘‘(B) subject to paragraph (2), during the 81 7 ⁄2

8 year period beginning with 1992.

9 ‘‘(2)(A) The Secretary of Health and Human Serv10 ices shall conduct a study that compares the health care

11 costs, quality of care, and access to services under medi12 care select policies with that under other medicare supple13 mental policies. The study shall be based on surveys of

14 appropriate age-adjusted sample populations. The study

15 shall be completed by December 31, 1998.

16 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall determine during 1999

17 whether the amendments made by this section shall remain in effect beyond the 81 18 ⁄2 year period described in

19 paragraph (1)(B). Such amendments shall remain in ef20 fect beyond such period unless the Secretary determines

21 (based on the results of the study under subparagraph

22 (A)) that—

23 ‘‘(i) such amendments have not resulted in sav24 ings of premiums costs to those enrolled in medicare

25 select policies (in comparison to their enrollment in
3

HR 483 EH

1 medicare supplemental policies that are not medicare

2 select policies and that provide comparable cov3 erage),

4 ‘‘(ii) there have been significant additional ex5 penditures under the medicare program as a result

6 of such amendments, or

7 ‘‘(iii) access to and quality of care has been sig8 nificantly diminished as a result of such amend9 ments.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 1995.

Attest:

Clerk.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 483

AN ACT

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to

States, and for other purposes.permit medicare select policies to be offered in all
Document

Exhibit 10.18


EQUITY COMMONWEALTH


Schedule of Annual Independent Trustee Fees and Other Compensation


The independent trustees of Equity Commonwealth are entitled to the following annual compensation:


									
	Annual Retainer - Cash 		$60,000
	Annual Retainer - Equity Awards		Each independent trustee will receive, at the trustee's option, restricted common shares of EQC or time-based LTIP units in EQC Operating Trust, with a value of $100,000 on an annual basis, which shares or units will vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.
	Lead Trustee Annual Retainer		$30,000
	Audit Committee Chair Annual Retainer		$20,000
	Compensation Committee Chair Annual Retainer		$15,000
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair Annual Retainer		$15,000
	Audit Committee Member		$8,000
	Compensation Committee Member		$6,000 	 
	Governance Committee Member		$6,000
	Reimbursements		Each independent trustee will be entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses related to a Board or Committee meeting.






Annual Compensation for Chairman of the Board of Trustees


The Chairman of the Board is entitled to the following annual compensation:
									
	Annual Retainer - LTIC Awards		The Chairman of the Board will receive equity awards pursuant to the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan (the “LTIC Awards”). 33% of the target LTIC Awards will consist of, at the Chairman's option, restricted common shares of EQC or time-based LTIP units in EQC Operating Trust, subject to time-based vesting restrictions. 67% of the target LTIC Awards will consist of, at the Chairman's option, restricted stock units of EQC (“RSUs”) or performance-based LTIP units in EQC Operating Trust ("PB LTIP Units"), subject to time-based and performance-based vesting restrictions.  The LTIC Awards issued to the Chairman of the Board will have a target value of $2,000,000. The number of RSUs or PB LTIP Units that will be earned by the Chairman of the Board, if any, will not be determined until the end of a three-year performance period, and therefore the actual value of any RSUs or PB LTIP Units could be higher or lower than the foregoing target level, depending on the Company’s achievement of the applicable performance criteria.
			
	Reimbursements 		The Chairman of the Board will be entitled to reimbursement for travel expenses related to company business and Board or Committee meetings.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

s0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

147085

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147085

COA: 309730

Van Buren CC: 11

- 017609

- FC

TOMMY LEE UNDERWOOD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### City of Cincinnati et al. *v.*Hanke Bros. Co. et al.

(No. 23570

Decided June 8, 1932.)

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, *Mr. Ed. F. Alexander*and Mr.. *Jacob Hauptman,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. William Jerome Kuerts*and *Mr. E. 8. Morrissey,*for defendants in error.

*640It appearing that the Judges of the Court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one Judge not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of this fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Jones, Matthias and Day, JJ., concur.

Kinkade, J., not participating.