alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000076063
<NAME> PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0 
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     58,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,800
<PP&E>                                       2,656,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,738,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,895,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          703,500
<BONDS>                                        299,200
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     570,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,895,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,500 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company is a wholly-owned
subsidiary.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 32,495

5 GUILLERMO VELASQUEZ,

6 Defendant-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Samuel L. Winder, District Judge

9 Gary K. King, Attorney General

10 Olga Serifimova

11 Santa Fe, NM 

12 for Appellant

13 Bennett J. Baur, Acting Chief Public Defender

14 B. Douglas Wood III, Assistant Appellate Defender

15 Santa Fe, NM 

16 for Appellee

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 VANZI, Judge.
2

1 {1} The State is appealing from a district court ruling that a 1999 prior

2 misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction could not be used to

3 enhance a current conviction because Defendant had not been represented by counsel

4 in the 1999 proceeding. [RP 77] Our second calendar notice proposed to affirm. The

5 State has responded with a memorandum in opposition. Not persuaded by the State’s

6 arguments, we affirm. 

7 {2} In State v. Aragon, 1997-NMSC-062, ¶ 8, 124 N.M. 399, 951 P.2d 616, our

8 Supreme Court stated the following.

9 Uncounseled convictions that result in a sentence of imprisonment,

10 whether actually served or suspended, violate the Sixth Amendment right

11 to counsel as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.

12 {3} In this case, contrary to the State’s assertion [MIO 3-4], the 1999 judgment

13 contained a term of imprisonment, which was suspended with conditions. [RP 57-62]

14 Accordingly, it could not be used to enhance Defendant’s sentence unless he had

15 counsel or had waived counsel, and the State concedes that the 1999 conviction was

16 uncounseled. [MIO 5] Nevertheless, in its memorandum in opposition, the State

17 argues [MIO 5-6] that the above-quoted language is dicta, because the defendant in

18 Aragon received a fine and not a suspended sentence. See Aragon, 1997-NMSC-062,

19 ¶ 9. However, we consider the above-quoted language to be controlling because it

20 draws a legal boundary for the requirement of counsel, and the fact that the judgment

21 in that case fell on the other side of that boundary does not affect the substance and
3

1 impact of the rule. See Alexander v. Delgado, 1973-NMSC-030, ¶ 8, 84 N.M. 717,

2 507 P.2d 778 (noting that our Supreme Court precedent controls). In other words, it

3 is not dicta. Accordingly, we affirm the district court.

4 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 __________________________________

6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 _________________________________

9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

10 _________________________________

11 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3915

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade, in the fisheries, and on the Great Lakes and their tributary

and connecting waters in trade with Canada, for the vessel

MARALINDA.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 30, 1996

Mr. CANADY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade, in the fisheries, and on the Great Lakes and their tributary and

connecting waters in trade with Canada, for the vessel

MARALINDA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106,

6 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the
2

•HR 3915 IH

1 Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of doc2 umentation with appropriate endorsement for employment

3 in the coastwise trade, in the fisheries, and on the Great

4 Lakes and their tributary and connecting waters in trade

5 with Canada, for the vessel MARALINDA (State of Flor6 ida registration number C023203–97).

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1993-C,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,283
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               35,067
<PP&E>                                         4,172,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,065,982)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,141,892
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          63,448
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,078,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,141,892
<SALES>                                        126,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,225
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  636,801<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (573,920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (573,920)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (573,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### Wayne PERRET and Phyllis Perret, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Steve BARNHOUSE and Kimberly Perret, Defendants/Respondents.

No. 69720.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Dec. 24, 1996.

William B. Beedie, Farmington, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Jill Colson Mackay, Farmington, for Defendants/Respondents.

Before AHRENS, C.J., CRANDALL, and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Perrett and Phyllis Perrett appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered for consolidated actions involving real property. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Steve Bamhouse’s motions to dismiss the appeal and for damages for frivolous appeal are overruled.
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

MAY 13, 2014

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WIT H RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED98970 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DWAYNE Q. SHELT ON,

APP

2. ED99396 JUDY PICKENS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, R ES

3. ED99659 SCOTT HENLEY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, R ES

4. ED99840 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DONALD JOHNSON, APP

5. ED100058 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAMION NEAL, APP

6. ED100067 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MICHAEL J. EMO RY, APP

7. ED100157 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KEITH MEINERS, APP

8. ED100278 CLINT RICHARDS, APP V LITITZ MUTUAL INS , RES

9. ED100329 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY MACK, APP

10. ED100486 CHRISTOPHER KIMBLE, APP V STATE OF MIS SOURI, RES

11. ED100499 IN THE INTEREST OF: D.S.

12. ED100652 C.M.J., RES V. R.P., APP
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
SigmaTron International, Inc.

We have issued our report dated June 27, 2002 accompanying the consolidated
balance sheet of SigmaTron International, Inc. at April 30, 2002, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended, and Schedule II included in the Annual Report of SigmaTron
International, Inc., and Subsidiary on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30,
2002. We also included within the Annual Report of SigmaTron International,
Inc., and Subsidiary on Form 10-K, our report dated June 27, 2002 accompanying
the balance sheet at April 30, 2002, and the related statements of income,
partners' equity and cash flows for the year then ended of SMT Unlimited L.P. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration Statements of SigmaTron International, Inc., and Subsidiary on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33 20147 and 333-52044).

                                                              GRANT THORNTON LLP

Chicago, Illinois
June 27, 2002
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 8- 15 76

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Dom in ic Keit h P ears on
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Sp rin gf ie ld

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Nov em

be r 2, 2 01 8 Fi le d: Nov em

be r 27 , 20 18 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BENTO N, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

D o m in ic Keit h Pear so n di rect ly ap pe al s th e be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce th e di st ric t co ur t 1 im

po se d aft er he pl ed gu il ty to se x cri m es in vo lv in g a m in or

. Co un se l

1 The Hon or ab le Ro se an n A. Ketc hm ark , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.ha s m ov ed fo r le av e to wit hd raw an d ha s fil ed a br ie f un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at th e se nt en ce is un reas on ab le

. Hav in g juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 1 29 1, t hi s co ur t af fir m s.

Afte r care fu l rev ie w, th is co ur t co nc lu de s th at th e di st ric t co ur t di d no t ab us e i t s di sc ret io n in se nt en ci ng Pear so n. The reco rd refl ect s th at th e di st ric t c o u r t
co ns id ered th e 18 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a) fact or s— in cl ud in g th e se rio us ne ss of th e of fen se s
an d Pear so n’s hi st or y

—an d im po se d a be lo w-Gui de li ne s se nt en ce. Se e Uni te d St at es
v. Feems te r , 57 2 F

. 3 d 4 5 5 , 46 1- 62 , 46 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) (en ba nc ); Uni te d St at es v. St ul ts , 57 5 F.3 d 83 4, 84 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ); Uni te d St at es v. La za rs ki , 56 0 F.3 d 73 1, 73 3 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ). Thi s co ur t h a s i n de pe nd en tl y rev ie wed th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 7 5 (1 98 8) , and fin ds no no nf riv ol ou s i ss ue s fo r ap pe al

.
The jud gm en t i s af

fir m ed . Cou ns el ’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is gra nt ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 547

To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that any data relating

to the incidence of poverty produced or published by the Secretary

of Commerce for subnational areas be corrected for differences in the

cost of living in those areas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 17, 1995

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 13, United States Code, to require that

any data relating to the incidence of poverty produced

or published by the Secretary of Commerce for

subnational areas be corrected for differences in the cost

of living in those areas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Poverty Data Correc5 tion Act.’’
2

•HR 547 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 5 of title 13, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding after subchapter V the

4 following:

5 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER VI—POVERTY DATA

6 ‘‘SEC. 201. CORRECTION OF SUBNATIONAL DATA RELATING

7 TO POVERTY.

8 ‘‘(a) Any data relating to the incidence of poverty

9 produced or published by or for the Secretary of

10 subnational areas shall be corrected for differences in the

11 cost of living, and data produced for State and sub-State

12 areas shall be corrected for differences in the cost of living

13 for at least all States of the United States.

14 ‘‘(b) Data under this section shall be published in

15 1997 and at least every second year thereafter.

16 SEC. 202. DEVELOPMENT OF STATE COST-OF-LIVING INDEX

17 AND STATE POVERTY THRESHOLDS.

18 ‘‘(a) To correct any data relating to the incidence of

19 poverty for differences in the cost of living, the Secretary

20 shall—

21 ‘‘(1) develop or cause to be developed a State

22 cost-of-living index which ranks and assigns an index

23 value to each State using data on wages, housing,

24 and other costs relevant to the cost of living; and

25 ‘‘(2) multiply the Federal Government’s statis26 tical poverty thresholds by the index value for each
3

•HR 547 IH

1 State’s cost of living to produce State poverty

2 thresholds for each State.

3 ‘‘(b) The State cost-of-living index and resulting

4 State poverty thresholds shall be published prior to Sep5 tember 30, 1996, for calendar year 1995 and shall be up6 dated annually for each subsequent calendar year.’’.

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec8 tions for chapter 5 of title 13, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SUBCHAPTER VI—POVERTY DATA

‘‘Sec. 201. Correction of subnational data relating to poverty.

‘‘Sec. 202. Development of State cost-of-living index and State poverty thresholds.’’.

Æ
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

 

2009-7102 

 KEITH D. SNYDER, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

Kenneth M. Carpenter, Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, Kansas, argued for 

claimant-appellant. 

Daniel Rabinowitz, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, 

United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. 

On the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, 

and Kirk T. Manhardt, Assistant Director, and Jeffrey A. Regner, Trial Attorney. Of counsel 

on the brief were Michael J. Timinski, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Michael G. 

Daugherty, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans 

Affairs, of Washington, DC. 

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims 

Judge Robert N. Davis 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 2009-7102 

KEITH D. SNYDER, 

 Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 

 Respondent-Appellee. 

 Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR VETERANS CLAIMS 

in CASE NO(S). 04-0381 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (LOURIE, GAJARSA, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). 

 AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

DATED February 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 629

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Resources

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate

in the operation of certain visitor facilities associated

with, but outside the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain

National Park in the State of Colorado.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 629 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as ‘‘The Fall River Visitor

3 Center Act of 1995’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS OUTSIDE AUTHORIZED

5 BOUNDARY OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL

6 PARK.

7 (a) VISITOR CENTER.—The Secretary of the Interior

8 is authorized to collect and expend donated funds and ex9 pend appropriated funds for the operation and mainte10 nance of a visitor center to be constructed for visitors to

11 and administration of Rocky Mountain National Park

12 with private funds on the privately owned lands described

13 in subsection (b).

14 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS OF LAND.—The lands

15 referred to in subsection (a) are described as follows:

16 Being land owned by H.W. Stewart, Inc., and

17 more particularly described as follows:

18 Beginning at the southwest corner of the

19 north one-half of section 16, township 5 north,

20 range 73 west of the sixth principal meridian,

21 Colorado; thence south eighty-seven degrees six

22 minutes east, eight hundred and fifty-four feet;

23 thence north two degrees west, three hundred

24 and forty-six and one-tenth feet to the south

25 boundary of the right-of-way of U.S. Highway

26 34; thence northwesterly along said south
3

HR 629 RFS

1 boundary nine hundred and sixty feet to the

2 west line of said section 16; thence south along

3 the west line of said section 16 to the point of

4 beginning.

Passed the House of Representatives October 17,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mondo Acquisition III, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Thomas A. Rose, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




(2)The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      October 30, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Thomas
      A. RoseThomas
      A. Rose
              Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
#### Emma Hayner, Appellant, v. Nelson P. Tilley, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.