alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.35**

**AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE**

**TO THE**

**HEALTH NET, INC.**

**2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN**

**WHEREAS**, Health Net, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Health Net, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) for thebenefit of key salaried employees and persons expected to become key salaried employees of the Company; 

**WHEREAS**, the Companydesires to amend the Plan to clarify that awards made under the Plan are intended to comply with, or be exempt from, the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations and InternalRevenue Service guidance issued thereunder; 

**WHEREAS**, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the power toamend the Plan pursuant to Section 8.2 thereof; and 

**WHEREAS**, the Compensation Committee of the Board has recommended that theBoard amend the Plan as provided below. 

**NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED**, that the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

“8.15*Section 409A Compliance*. Awards under the Plan are intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the Code and all awards shall be interpreted in accordance with Section 409A and the Treasury Regulations and otherInternal Revenue Service guidance issued thereunder, including without limitation any such regulations or other guidance that may be issued after the effective date of the Plan. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or any Agreement to thecontrary, in the event that the Committee determines that any award may or does not comply with, or satisfy an exemption from, Section 409A of the Code, the Company may adopt such amendments to the Plan and the affected award or Agreement(without Participant consent) or adopt other policies and procedures (including amendments, policies and procedures with retroactive effect), or take any other actions, that the Committee determines are necessary or appropriate to (i) exemptany award from the application of Section 409A of the Code and/or preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided with respect to award, or (ii) comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.” 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, Health Net, Inc. hascaused this instrument to be signed on this 4th day of December, 2008. 

 
**HEALTH NET, INC.**By: 
/s/ Karin Mayhew
Name: Karin MayhewTitle: Senior Vice President, Organization Effectiveness
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

Appointment of Individuals To Serve as Members of Performance Review Board.

# DATES:

*Effective:*                         July 4, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia Roscoe, Director of Human Resources,  U.S. International Trade Commission, (202) 205-2651. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission has appointed the following individuals to serve on the Commission's Performance Review Board (PRB): 

Chair of the PRB: Vice-Chairman Daniel R. Pearson. 

Vice-Chair of the PRB: Dean A. Pinkert. 

Member: David Beck. 

Member: Robert G. Carpenter. 

Member: Robert B. Koopman. 

Member: Karen Laney-Cummings. 

Member: Lynn I. Levine. 

Member: James M. Lyons. 

Member: Stephen A. McLaughlin. 

Member: Robert A. Rogowsky. 

Member: Lyn M. Schlitt. 

                    This notice is published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to the requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). This notice replaces the notice published at 73 FR 46334 (August 8, 2008); that notice is withdrawn. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting our TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.                 

Issued: August 8, 2008. 

By order of the Chairman. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8-18768 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,493,976
<SECURITIES>                                   5,324,336
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,288,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                   222,293
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,328,018
<PP&E>                                         14,102,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,433,637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 41,259,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,031,292
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,383
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,784,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   41,924,232
<SALES>                                        41,924,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,924,232
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  34,484,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,490,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,898,901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,050,074
<INCOME-TAX>                                   747,835
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,115,782
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .33



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 705 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 705

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit citizenship at 
birth, merely by virtue of birth in the United States, to persons with 
                   citizen or legal resident mothers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 26, 1995

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to limit citizenship at 
birth, merely by virtue of birth in the United States, to persons with 
                   citizen or legal resident mothers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITING CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH, MERELY BY VIRTUE OF BIRTH IN 
              THE UNITED STATES, TO PERSONS WITH LEGAL RESIDENT 
              MOTHERS.

    (a) In General.--Section 301(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the 
following: ``, of a mother who is a citizen or legal resident of the 
United <plus-minus>States''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to persons born after the date of ratification of an article of 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States that repeals the 
first sentence of section 1 of the fourteenth article of amendment to 
the Constitution of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Yifan Communications, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Myint
      J. Kyaw, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
                Myint J.
                Kyaw
              Myint
                J. Kyaw
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              March
                14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                            4321
<SECURITIES>                                       507
<RECEIVABLES>                                      570
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6011
<PP&E>                                            1481
<DEPRECIATION>                                     912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              171
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6580
<SALES>                                           1502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1502
<CGS>                                             1262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    109
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 74
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        74
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

s0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

148050 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148050

COA: 314972

Berrien CC: 2005

- 411847

- FC

LAWRENCE WOODS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2 , 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to remand is DENIED.
#### John Walsh, Pltff in Error, v. The People of the State of Illinois, Defts in Error.

ERROR- TO RANDOLPH,, . ■ '

Appeal bonds in criminal cases, are .governed vbytlie,.99ih section., of..the, 69,th chapter of the Revised Statutes, arid cannot lie amended.

This was a proceeding instituted before a justice of the peace, upon a complaint for an assault- and battery. A trial was had *80and a fine of ten dollars was inflicted upon the plaintiff in error; whereupon he prayed an appeal to the Circuit Court, which was allowed. A bond was executed in the penal sum of $42 00, reciting that the judgment was fora like sum. In the Circuit Court, a motion was made to dismiss, because the appeal bond did not conform to the requisitions of law. The Circuit Court, Underwood, Judge, presiding, sustained the motion, and dismissed the appeal. The defendant below, brings the cause to this Court. The defendant below, moved for leave to amend his appeal bond, which was denied by the Circuit Court. The refusal-to allow an amendment of the appeal bond is the error complained of.

W. J. A. Bradford, for Pltff in Error.

P. Fowke, District Attorney, for the People.

Treat, C. J.

Walsh prosecuted an appeal from the decision of a justice of the peace, imposing upon him a fine of ten dollars for an assault and battery. The appeal bond was in the penalty of forty-two dollars, and recited a judgment for the same amount.

The Circuit Court refused leave to amend the bond, and dismissed the appeal. Those decisions are assigned for error. The bond was clearly defective. It did not clearly describe the j udgment appealed from. There was a material variance between the judgment rendered by the justice, and the one referred to in the condition of the bond. The Court properly refused to allow the bond to be amended. The sixty-fifth section of the fifty-ninth chapter of the Revised Statutes applies only to appeals in civil cases. Appeal bonds in criminal cases are governed by the provisions of the ninety-ninth- section of the same chapter, which do not authorize them to be amended. The case of Swafford *v.*The People, 1 Scammon, 289, is directly in point. The present statute is precisely like the one, under which that decision was made.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

*Judgment*affirmed.
176 La. 846

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Cecil MALONE. In re Cecil Malone, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition.

No. 32221.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1933.

Dimick & Hamilton and George G. Dimick, all of Shreveport, for relators.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., and Nash Johnson, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport (James O’Niell, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The relator was prosecuted under a bill of information charging that he had violated the Hood Act, being Act No. 39 of 1921 (Ex. Sess.), as amended by Act No. 57 of 1924. He moved to quash the bill of information, on the ground that the Hood Act was repealed by Act No. 238 of 1932. The district attorney pleaded that the act of 1932 was unconstitutional. The district judge overruled the motion to quash, holding that Act No. 238 of 1932 was unconstitutional. The case is before us on a writ of certiorari and alternative writs of prohibition and mandamus, to stop the prosecution of the relator.

We decided to-day in State v. Herbert Watkins, 147 So. 8, that Act No. 238 of 1932 was unconstitutional.

Por the reasons given in that case the writs issued in this ease are recalled, the relief prayed for by the relator is denied, and this proceeding in the Supreme Court is dismissed.

ST. PAUL, J., absent because of illness.
## NO. 12

- 16

- 00202

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

ALBERT RANDOLPH,

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 114T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINIO N

PER CURIAM

Appellant , acting pro se, has filed a motion to withdraw his appeal, which we construe as

a motion to dismiss the appeal. No decision has been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly,

Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted , and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered August 31, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTR ICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 3 1 , 2016

NO. 12

- 16

- 00202

- CR

ALBERT RANDOLPH,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 114th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 114

- 2075

- 07)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below fo r observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
## IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL A PPE ALS

OF TEXAS

NO. P D-0228-15

ALAN OMAR

RODRIG UEZ, Appellant

v.

THE S TATE O F TEXAS

ON AP P ELL ANT’S P ETIT ION F OR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

F ROM THE FIRST COURT OF AP P EALS

HARRIS COUNTY

P er c uriam . Ke asler, and Hervey, JJ., dissent.

O R D E R

T h e p e t i t i o n f

o r d i s c r e t i o n a r y r e v i e w v i o l a t e s R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 9

. 3 ( b ) ( 1 )

a n d 6 8

. 4 ( j ) b e c a u s e t h e o r i g i n a l p e t i t i o n i s n o t a c c o m p a n i e d b y 1 1 c o p i e s a n d t h e p e t i t i o n

d o e s n o t c o n t a i n a c o p y o f t h e o p i n i o n o f t h e c o u r t o f a p p e a l s

.

T h e p e t i t i o n i s s t r u c k

. S e e R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 6 8

. 6

.

T h e p e t i t i o n e r m a y r e d r a w t h e p e t i t i o n

. T h e r e d r a w n p e t i t i o n a n d c o p i e s m u s t b e f i l e d

i n t h e C o u r t o f C r i m i n a l A p p e a l s w i t h i n t h i r t y d a y s a f t e r t h e d a t e o f t h i s O r d e r

.

F i l e d : A p r i l 2 9

, 2 0 1 5

D o N o t P u b l i s h
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45752-45753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM06-22-003]


Mandatory Reliability Standards for Critical Infrastructure 
Protection; Notice of Filing

July 31, 2008.
    Take notice that on July 30, 2008, The North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation filed a supplemental filing to include 
Violation Risk Factors for nine requirements or sub-requirements in the 
Critical Infrastructure Protection Reliability Standards CIP-002-1 
through CIP-009-1 that have been approved by the Commission, pursuant 
to the directives in paragraphs 751 and 757 of the Commission's January 
18, 2008, Order No. 706.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b3d3e293834151712151e280e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ec8cbdccdc1e0e2e7e0ebddfbfefee1fcfacee8ebfceda0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 45753]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 19, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18010 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Eva Davis, Appellant, v. Lucy Sanford, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Tongji Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended  March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 14, 2010



/s/ Yunhui YuYunhui Yu

President and Chief Executive Officer