alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,532,359
<SECURITIES>                                 6,000,620
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,177,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (420,833)
<INVENTORY>                                  6,647,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,579,712
<PP&E>                                       7,383,514
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,148,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,113,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,012,259
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,020
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,722,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,113,316
<SALES>                                     37,586,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,586,938
<CGS>                                       12,911,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,194,377
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,889,649
<INCOME-TAX>                                   746,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,143,649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,143,649
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 590 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 590

 To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to air carrier safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 1995

 Mr. Oberstar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to air carrier safety.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIFORM APPLICATION OF MINIMUM SAFETY STANDARDS FOR AIR 
              CARRIERS.

    Section 44701 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f) Standard of Safety for Air Carriers.--Not later than March 1, 
1996, the minimum safety standards prescribed by the Administrator 
under subsection (b)(1) shall apply uniformly to all operations by air 
carriers providing air transportation, without regard to the seating or 
payload capacity of the aircraft involved; except that the 
Administrator may--
            ``(1) prescribe alternative safety standards for the 
        operation of aircraft of a type approved by the Administrator 
        for transportation of no more than 9 passengers (exclusive of 
        flight crew);
            ``(2) prescribe alternative safety standards for the 
        operation of an aircraft of a type approved by the 
        Administrator for transportation of no more than 30 passengers 
        (exclusive of flight crew) if such aircraft is not used to 
        provide scheduled air transportation; and
            ``(3) prescribe alternative safety standards, ensuring an 
        equivalent level of safety, for the operation of aircraft of a 
        type designed for the transportation of no more than 19 
        passengers (exclusive of flight crew) for which application for 
        design approval was made to the Administrator prior to February 
        17, 1987.
Alternative standards may be prescribed under paragraph (3) only for 
specific areas as to which the Administrator finds that alternative 
standards are necessary because the aircraft's approved design makes 
compliance with one or more of the uniform standards impossible.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000916310
<NAME> PROTECTION ONE ALARM MONITORING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,658
<SECURITIES>                                     6,664
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,405
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,689
<INVENTORY>                                     12,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,380
<PP&E>                                          89,919
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,558,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,313
<BONDS>                                        822,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,269
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,261,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,558,235
<SALES>                                        605,176
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               605,176
<CGS>                                          184,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (12,869)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                21,641
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,490)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (28,276)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (81,214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,691)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,905)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. ss. 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies that, to hisknowledge:1. The Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.                                                   /s/ Robert F. McCullough, Jr.   Robert F. McCullough, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer Dated:  August 21, 2006
DLD-138 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12-3989

_____________

EDWARD P. SEMULKA,

 Appellant

v.

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA; 

PA BAR ASSOCIATION; 

PA STATE POLICE; SHANNON SWORSKI; 

CHEVRON INC.; UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH; 

PITTSBURGH POLICE; UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE

__________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 12-cv-00713)

District Judge: Honorable David S. Cercone

______________________________________

Submitted on a Motion to Reopen, and for Possible Dismissal

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

February 28, 2013

Before: AMBRO, SMITH and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: March 14, 2013)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Edward P. Semulka appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the 
2

Western District of Pennsylvania, which granted his motion for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis (“IFP”) and dismissed his complaint as frivolous.1 We grant his motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis and to reopen the appeal and to file a motion to reopen out of time.2 However, 

we will dismiss the appeal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

We have reviewed the complaint and the District Court’s order dismissing the 

complaint. We agree with the District Court that the complaint is rambling and fails to present 

any colorable legal basis for relief. We also agree that his claims are time-barred by the 

applicable statutes of limitations.

In his Argument Supporting Appeal, Semulka does not indicate why he believes the 

District Court erred in dismissing his complaint as frivolous. Instead, he simply repeats his 

claims and attempts to add new claims, which is not allowed on appeal. In re Reliant Energy 

Channelview LP, 594 F.3d 200, 209 (3d Cir. 2010). We will thus dismiss the appeal as 

frivolous.

 

1 Although the District Court cited 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), that appears to be a typographical error, as 

subsection “e” is the section that provides for dismissing a complaint as frivolous.

2

Semulka has demonstrated the inability to pay the fees on appeal. See Walker v. People Express 

Airlines, Inc., 886 F.2d 598, 601 (3d Cir. 1989). We thus grant the application to proceed IFP. 

Although a motion to reopen must generally be filed within ten days of the date of dismissal, see Third 

Circuit LAR Misc. 107.2(a), Semulka has filed a motion for leave to file the motion to reopen out of 

time. He indicates that he has a disability that makes it difficult to comply with the deadlines. In this 

instance, we will excuse the lateness of the motion to reopen. For the same reason, we find that 

Semulka has shown good cause for failing to timely file his motion to proceed IFP and that reopening 

is thus warranted.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


     I, Thomas W. Stenoien, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Stratasys, Inc. (the
"registrant");

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of and for the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors:

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 12, 2004                                 /s/ THOMAS W. STENOIEN
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Thomas W. Stenoien
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 30558 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Keyon Pullins,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:21

- CR

- 40

- 1

**______________________ ________**  Before **King, Higginson,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Keyon Pullins has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pullins has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to al low us to make a fair evaluation of Pullins ’s claim

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 9, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30558 Document: 00516670765 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2023No. 22

- 30558

2 sounding in ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Pullins ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Acc ordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 22-30558 Document: 00516670765 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2023
No. 72-1227.

No. 72-1228.

No. 72-1229.

#### Morton, Secretary of the Interior *v.*Wilderness Society et al.; Alaska *v.*Wilderness Society et al.; and Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. *v.*Wilderness Society et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Order entered June 7, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00173-CR

No. 05-12-00174-CR

MAHIR ABDALRAZZAAQEL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-00580-H, F11-00581-H 

ORDER

In these cases, appellant raises issues related to the costs assessed against him. The 

records, however, do not contain costs bills or other documents with itemized lists of costs 

assessed in the cases.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing detailed itemizations of 

the costs assessed in the cases, including, but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and courtappointed attorney fees. The supplemental clerk’s records shall also include documents 

explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court-appointed 

attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk, Criminal Records 

Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Dr. Augusto Ocana certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CytoCore, Inc.;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;(4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc. disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and(5) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.         /s/ Dr. Augusto Ocana.   Dr. Augusto Ocana.   Chief Executive Officer  Dated:  May 14, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 26,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Koppers Industries, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2000 in the following Registration Statements:


   . Registration Statement No. 333-59121 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Koppers
     Industries, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan;

   . Registration Statement No. 333-39478 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Koppers
     Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Koppers Industries, Inc. 1997
     Stock Option Plan and the Koppers Industries, Inc. Restated and Amended
     Stock Option Plan;

   . Registration Statement No. 333-39486 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Employee
     Savings Plan of Koppers Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the Koppers
     Industries, Inc. Savings Plan for Union Hourly Employees.



                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2001
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Hirsch  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  January 31,  2004,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Beverly  Eichel,  Vice  President  - Finance,  Chief  Financial  Officer and
Secretary  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
               and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Beverly Eichel
                                        ------------------
                                        Beverly Eichel, Vice President, Finance,
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

April 30, 2004

     This  certification  is made solely for the  purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any
other purpose.