alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 614

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8 (legislative day, JUNE 5), 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the

State of Minnesota the New London National Fish

Hatchery production facility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NEW LONDON NATIONAL

4 FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION FACILITY.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding

6 any other provision of law and within 180 days after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the

8 Interior shall convey to the State of Minnesota without

9 reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the United

10 States in and to the property comprising the New London
2

HR 614 RFS

1 National Fish Hatchery production facility, located out2 side of downtown New London, Minnesota, including—

3 (1) all easements and water rights relating to

4 that property, and

5 (2) all land, improvements, and related personal

6 property comprising that production facility.

7 (b) USE OF PROPERTY.—All property and interests

8 conveyed under this section shall be used by the Minnesota

9 Department of Natural Resources for the Minnesota fish10 ery resources management program.

11 (c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The prop12 erty conveyed to the State of Minnesota pursuant to this

13 section shall be used by the State for purposes of fishery

14 resources management, and if it is used for any other pur15 pose all right, title, and interest in and to all property

16 conveyed pursuant to this section shall revert to the Unit17 ed States. The State of Minnesota shall ensure that the

18 property reverting to the United States is in substantially

19 the same or better condition as at the time of transfer.

Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 473

To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with toxic air emissions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 11, 1995

Mr. DELAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with toxic

air emissions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CLEAN AIR ACT PROVISIONS RE4 LATING TO TOXIC AIR EMISSIONS.

5 Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401

6 and following), relating to hazardous air pollutants, is

7 hereby repealed.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Carnegie Bancorp (the "Company") on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-81918 and 333-20515),
and in the post effective amendment on Form S-3 to the registration statement of
the Company on Form SB-2 (File No. 33-80426) of our report dated February 3,
1997, which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the change in method of
accounting for certain investment securities in 1994, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Carnegie Bancorp and Subsidiary as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and
1994 which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. We also consent to
the reference to our Firm under the caption "Experts".

                                        /s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND LLP


Princeton, New Jersey
March 31, 1997
#### Charles M. Weeks, as Surviving Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of George W. Weeks, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Julia Frankel, Defendant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs, and order signed. Present — Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 11-1355 September Term, 2013

FCC-76FR59192

Filed On: January 15, 2014

Verizon,

Appellant

v.

Federal Communications Commission,

Appellee

------------------------------

Independent Telephone &

Telecommunications Alliance, et al.,

Intervenors

------------------------------

Consolidated with 11-1356

BEFORE: Rogers and Tatel, Circuit Judges, and Silberman, Senior Circuit

Judge

O R D E R

It is, ORDERED, on the court’s own motion that the opinion concurring in part

and dissenting in part filed on January 14, 2014, be amended as follows:

Slip Op. Concurrence/Dissent at p. 3, lines 3-4: Delete the words “to increase

profits”.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Jennifer M. Clark 

Deputy Clerk
#### In the Matter of David Goldsticker, Deceased.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:30 a.m., Monday, August 18, 2008.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2. Staff resource and work product planning.

3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 8, 2008.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E8-18773 Filed 8-8-08; 3:45 pm]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### Frederick de P. Foster and Others v. Edward K. Sutton and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report of Hirsch  International  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  January 28,  2006,  as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I,  Paul  Gallagher,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer,  hereby  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1    The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                         -----------------------------------
                                         Paul Gallagher, President,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Operating Officer


April 27, 2006

     This  certification  is made solely for the  purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any
other purpose.
#### William Frank MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Don HOLLOWAY, Sheriff of Pennington County, et al. Appellee.

No. 03-1178.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 2003.

Decided Aug. 6, 2003.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William Marshall appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Pennington County Sheriff Don Holloway. We affirm.

Marshall was detained at the Pennington County, South Dakota, Jail on the night of November 25, 2000. Marshall filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that throughout that night and the following morning jail officials failed to afford him appropriate medical treatment for his stroke-like symptoms and thus were deliberately indifferent to his medical condition in violation of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. *See Liebe v. Norton,*157 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir.1998) (citing *Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U.S. 97, 104, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976))(“The Supreme Court has held that prison inmates have a constitutional right, under the Eighth Amendment, to have serious medical needs addressed.”). Having reviewed the record in the light most favorable to Marshall, as we must on summary judgment, we conclude that the district court did not err in ruling that Marshall was not treated with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. As the record shows, Marshall was monitored and then taken to the hospital when his condition worsened.

Marshall brought this action against Holloway in his official capacity as Sheriff *607of Pennington County; therefore, it must be treated as a suit against Pennington County. *Id.*at 578 (citing *Hafer v. Melo,*502 U.S. 21, 25, 112 S.Ct. 358, 116 L.Ed.2d 301 (1991)). “[I]n a § 1983 action, a municipality may only be held hable for constitutional deprivations if the deprivation is the result of a policy or custom of the municipality.” *Id.*at 578-79. Accordingly, even if Marshall had demonstrated that a constitutional deprivation occurred, his claim against Pennington County would fail, for he has pointed to no evidence that the County had a policy or custom of deliberate indifference to an inmate’s medical needs.

The judgment is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R.47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 11, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 11, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0312. JENNY BUTLER v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STATE OF GEORGIA et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2020SUCA239
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard A. WHITE, Appellant.

No. WD 51009.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Jarrett A. Johnson, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Philip M. Koppe, Assistant Attorney General, Kansas City, for respondent.

*716Before ULRICH, C.J., P.J., and SPINDEN and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Richard White appeals from his conviction and sentence as a prior and persistent offender for stealing property with a value of $150 or more, section 570.030 RSMo 1994, after a jury trial. He asserts that the trial court erred in not declaring a mistrial because of a statement made by the prosecutor during closing argument. No precedential purpose exists in publishing a written opinion. The conviction is affirmed by summary order. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 (Form 10-Q), I, Christopher P. Johns, President of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, that:



| |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (1) |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    
| |  |    
| |  | (2) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.



CHRISTOPHER P. JOHNSCHRISTOPHER P. JOHNSPresident


August 4, 2010



---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 (Form 10-Q), I, Sara A. Cherry, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (1) |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    
| |  |    
| |  | (2) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.



SARA A. CHERRYSARA A. CHERRYVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer


August 4, 2010
#### Howard Aldrich, Appellant, v. John E. Stilson, Respondent.

Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred; Cochrane, J., not sitting.
Order entered May 20, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00561-CV

BALTASAR D. CRUZ, Appellant

V.

JAMES VAN SICKLE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09275

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s unopposed motion to designate court reporter’s record 

and clerk’s record in cause no. 05-13-00191-CV for use as court reporter’s record and clerk’s 

record in this cause number. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to 

designate the clerk’s record and reporter’s record in cause number 05-13-00191-CV, styled 

Baltasar D. Cruz v. James Van Sickle, et al., for use as the clerk’s record and reporter’s record in 

this cause. We ORDER appellant to arrange for the filing of any supplemental clerk’s record or 

supplemental reporter’s record within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Donald S. SCOLA, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Edward E. THARP, et al., Defendants/Appellants.

No. 68769.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

July 9, 1996.

David E. Woods, O’Fallon, for defendants/appellants.

William W. Wunderlich, High Ridge, for plaintiffs/respondents.

Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs, Donald and Joanne Scola, brought suit against defendant Elizabeth Tharp seeking to quiet title to the property that plaintiffs reside on. After a bench trial, the trial court entered a judgment which quieted title to the property in the plaintiffs, awarded legal fees to plaintiffs and barred defendant from bringing suit against plaintiffs on an underlying contract between the parties. Defendant appeals the judgment of the trial court. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
#### John T. Knox, *et al.,*Pltffs in Error, *v.*James E. Breed, Deft in Error.

ERROR TO FRANKLIN.

Where the verdict and judgment are too general, the judgment will he reversed.

This was an action of debt brought in the Franklin Circuit Court, by defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error ; the cause was tried before Denning, Judge, and a jury at September Term, 1850, when the following verdict was found by the jury: “ Upon their oaths do say $-118 75, (Four Hundred and Eighteen Dollars and 75 Cents,)” upon which verdict, judgment was entered as follows: “ Ordered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, the sum of Four Hundred and Eighteen Dollars and 75 Cents, together with their proper costs and charges and may have execution.” A motion for a new trial was made and overruled.

Defendant below brings the cause here and assigns for error, the informality of the verdict and judgment.

Casey & Montgomery and W. B. Scares for PMs in Error.

R. Wingate and James M. Warren, for Defts in Error.

Per Curiam.

The verdict and judgment are too general. The Case of Toles *v.*Cole, 11 Ills., 502, is precisely in point. Reverse the judgment, with costs, and remand the cause for further proceedings.

*Judgment reversed.*
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





I, Frank
Slootman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Data Domain,
Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Data Domain, Inc.





Date:
      August 7, 2008
            By:
            
            /s/
      FRANK SLOOTMANFrank
      SlootmanChief
      Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129094 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129094 

 COA: 259671 
 Wayne CC: 94-001659-FY

RAPHAEL P. STRADWICK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,521,745
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  554,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,241,050
<PP&E>                                      13,278,627
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,702,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,827,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,253,565
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,412
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,505,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,827,189
<SALES>                                        851,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,099,787
<CGS>                                          107,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,835,151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,735,364)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,735,364)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,735,364)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Stratasys, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert F.
Gallagher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Date:
      April 27, 2012 | /s/ ROBERT F. GALLAGHER       | 
|-------------------------- | ----------------------------- | 
|                           | Robert F.
      Gallagher    
|                           | Chief
      Financial Officer

24

---