alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
       COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996,
       AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
       STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000074856
<NAME>                        OREGON METALLURGICAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         70,609
<SECURITIES>                                   9,761
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,651
<INVENTORY>                                    93,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               214,201
<PP&E>                                         103,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (69,426)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 249,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          47,123
<BONDS>                                        4,595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,086
<OTHER-SE>                                     175,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   249,943
<SALES>                                        174,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,798
<CGS>                                          133,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,506
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                21,987
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7,011
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.24
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of The Pantry, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Peter J. Sodini, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/    PETER J. SODINIPeter J. SodiniChief Executive OfficerDate: December 12, 2006




This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether
made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 740 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 740

  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 1995

 Mr. Skeen (for himself and Mr. Schiff) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To confer jurisdiction on the United States Court of Federal Claims 
     with respect to land claims of Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION.

    Notwithstanding sections 2401 and 2501 of title 28, United States 
Code, and section 12 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1052), or 
any other law which would interpose or support a defense of 
untimeliness, jurisdiction is hereby conferred upon the United States 
Court of Federal Claims to hear, determine, and render judgment on any 
claim by Pueblo of Isleta Indian Tribe of New Mexico against the United 
States with respect to any lands or interests therein the State of New 
Mexico or any adjoining State held by aboriginal title or otherwise 
which were acquired from the tribe without payment of adequate 
compensation by the United States. As a matter of adequate 
compensation, the United States Claims Court may award interest at a 
rate of five percent per year to accrue from the date on which such 
lands or interests therein were acquired from the tribe by the United 
States. Such jurisdiction is conferred only with respect to claims 
accruing on or before August 13, 1946, and all such claims must be 
filed within three years after the date of enactment of this Act. Such 
jurisdiction is conferred notwithstanding any failure of the tribe to 
exhaust any available administrative remedy.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN DEFENSES NOT APPLICABLE.

    Any award made to any Indian tribe other than the Pueblo of Isleta 
Indian Tribe of New Mexico before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act under any judgment of the Indian Claims 
Commission or any other authority with respect to any lands that are 
the subject of a claim submitted by the tribe under section 1 shall not 
be considered a defense, estoppel, or set-off to such claim, and shall 
not otherwise affect the entitlement to, or amount of, any relief with 
respect to such claim.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 654

To provide for the conversion of the assistance for the Tamaqua Highrise

housing project in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, from a leased housing contract to tenant-based assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mr. HOLDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To provide for the conversion of the assistance for the

Tamaqua Highrise housing project in Tamaqua, Pennsylvania, from a leased housing contract to tenant-based

assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONVERSION OF ASSISTANCE.

4 From amounts available for the conversion of the

5 Tamaqua Highrise project in the Borough of Tamaqua,

6 Pennsylvania, from a leased housing contract under sec7 tion 23 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 to ten8 ant-based assistance under section 8 of such Act, the Sec-
2

•HR 654 IH

1 retary of Housing and Urban Development shall, to the

2 extent such amounts are made available in appropriation

3 Acts, enter into an obligation for the conversion of the

4 project to a project-based rental assistance contract under

5 section 8 of such Act, notwithstanding the requirement for

6 rehabilitation or the percentage limitations under section

7 8(d)(2) of such Act.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 27, 2021 No. 04-20-00569-CV CITY OF SAN ANTONIO BY AND THROUGH THE SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM , Appellant
v. CAMPBELLTON ROAD, LTD. ,

Appellee From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-13949 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on or before February 10, 2021
.

_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### PUTMAN & NORMAN, Inc., v. LEVEE.

No. 1458.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

March 25, 1935.

See, also, 179 La. 180, 153 So. 685; 180 La. 101, 156 So. 189. •

Ferd. C. Claiborne, of New Roads, for appellant.

Fred G. Benton, of Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

DORE, Judge.

Plaintiff-corporation sued defendant herein for a money judgment; defendant answered and prayed for a trial by jury.

The first jury trial ended in a mistrial and the jury was dismissed. Upon the case being refixed, the defendant objected to the trial of the cause by the judge for the reason that he had formerly prayed for a trial by jury. His objections were overruled, and defendant applied for writs of mandamus and cer-tiorari commanding the lower court to grant hjm a trial by jury.

This court decided that the ruling of the court was correct; whereupon the defendant applied to the Supreme Court for writs to review our judgment, and the Supreme Court reversed our judgment and remanded the case to be tried by jury according to its views.

Upon the second trial of this case, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, from which an appeal was taken to this court.

The defendant appeared and filed a motion to annul the said judgment, alleging that, pri- or to the trial of the said cause, the plaintiff-corporation had been dissolved and liquidators appointed, and the said liquidators had not been made parties plaintiff; and which facts were practically admitted by counsel for plaintiffs.

It is elementary that whenever a corporation is dissolved, it ceases to exist, and the liquidator appointed then is sole representative of the said corporation. See Act No. 250 of 1928.

We have no jurisdiction to ascertain the subject-matter herein, and this must be taken up by the lower court; however, we do tafee cognizance of the fact that the corporation has been dissolved of date June 8, 1932, prior to the trial in which resulted the judgment appealed from.

The judgment, not having been rendered contradictorily with liquidators appointed according to Act No. 250 of 1928, is null, void, and of no effect. There was no plaintiff before the lower court, and there is none before this court.

It'is;, for these reasons, that the judgment herein appealed from is annulled, avoided, and reversed; and that the same is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings in accordance with this judgment and the law in such cases made and provided; the costs of this appeal to be paid by appeUee; all other costs in the lower court to abide the result of further proceedings.
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **Certification
Pursuant to**
 **18
U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **as
Adopted Pursuant to**
 **Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line
Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas F. Karam, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
THOMAS F. KARAM
 Name:
Thomas F. Karam
 Title:
Chief Executive Officer
 Date: May
10, 2005
 
 
 
 
 This
Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 60

To provide that compliance by the States with the National Voter Registration

Act of 1993 shall be voluntary.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. LIVINGSTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To provide that compliance by the States with the National

Voter Registration Act of 1993 shall be voluntary.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, on and after the date of the enactment of this Act,

4 compliance by the States with the National Voter Reg5 istration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq.) shall be

6 voluntary.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1

                              [Company Letterhead]

                                 March 20, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza

Washington, DC  20549

         Re:      CONFIRMATION OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN REPRESENTATIONS

      This letter confirms that Arch Wireless Communications, Inc. has received
from Arthur Andersen LLP, the independent public accountant engaged by the
company to examine the company's financial statements that are included in the
Form 10-K to which this letter is filed as an exhibit, a representation letter
addressed to the company and stating that:

      o  the audit conducted by Andersen was subject to Andersen's quality
         control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
         reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
         with professional standards; and

      o  there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on
         audits, availability of national office consultation and availability
         of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant
         portions of the audit.

                                Very truly yours,

                                ARCH WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                By: /S/ J. ROY POTTLE
                                   -----------------------
                                   Name: J. Roy Pottle
                                   Title:  Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-2302

_____________________________

JAMES E. DORTCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Linda L. Nobles, Judge.

December 18, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

James E. Dortch, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 033-95702, 033-97542,
333-02892, 333-20245, 333-24493, 333-30328, 333-123434 and 333-151393 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
No. 333-140362 on Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-3 and on Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 on
Form S-8 to Form S-4 of our reports dated March 23, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Protection
One, Inc. and the effectiveness of Protection One, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Protection
One, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas
City, Missouri
March 23, 2010

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Moore Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M.
Zinzarella, Vice President, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John M. Zinzarella
John M. Zinzarella, CPA
Vice President, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2002
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-39445, No. 333-09807, No. 333-20779, No. 33-96616, and No.
33-78542) pertaining to the Stock Option Agreements for Eugene L. Goda, Ronald
J. Clear and James H. Smith, 1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan of
ObjectShare Systems, Inc., 1993 Stock Plan and 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
of ParcPlace-Digitalk, Inc., 1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1989 Stock Option
Plan, 1992 Incentive and Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, and the 1995 Director
Stock Option Plan of ParcPlace-Digitalk, Inc. of our report dated June 14, 1999,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
ObjectShare, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
March 31, 1999.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orange County, California
July 13, 1999
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation by reference in Post Effective  Amendment No. 1
to Registration  Statement No. 33-94914 on Form S-8,  Registration No. 333-30237
on Form S-8 and Registration  No. 333-22535 on Form S-3 of Hirsch  International
Corp. and  Subsidiaries of our report dated April 15, 2004,  except for Note 15,
which is as of April 30, 2004,  appearing in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K of
Hirsch International Corp. and Subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2004.



By: /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
Melville, New York
April 30, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

d0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148993

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148993

COA: 320025

Berrien CC: 2013-003272-FH

TAYATA ALLEN DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073) is pending on appeal before this Court and that 

the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.