alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*206*La. 200

#### STATE ex rel. BAYER v. WHITE, State Police, et al.

No. 37526.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1944.

William C. Boone, of Leesville, for appellant.

J. R. Ferguson, of Leesville, for appel-lees.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The appellee moved to dismiss the appeal on two grounds: (1) That the appellant acquiesced voluntarily in the judgment of the district court; and (2) that the case now presents only a moot question.

We are not favored with either a brief or the appearance of counsel in behalf of the appellant.

The record shows that the relatrix was inflicted with a venereal disease and refused to report to the Vernon Parish Health Unit for treatment. Whereupon, the Federal and State Boards of Health placed her in the Quarantine and Isolation Hospital operated by the Boards at Lees-ville, Vernon Parish, La., for treatment, on March 6, 1944. On March 20, 1944, she filed an habeas corpus proceeding against the Captain of the State Police, the physician and the manager in charge of the Quarantine and Isolation Hospital. A rule to show cause why she should not be released and restored to her liberty was issued by the district judge and upon the trial thereof on March 22, 1944, there was judgment dismissing the rule at her costs. After her return to the hospital, she summoned a taxi and drove away, thereby breaking the quarantine imposed upon her. Thereafter she appealed sus-pensively from the judgment of the court a qua. Several days later, she was charged with breaking quarantine and arrested and placed in jail. She then immediately and voluntarily asked that she be allowed to return to the hospital and complete her treatments. This request was granted and, of her own free will and accord, she returned to the hospital where she was treated until April 8, 1944, when she was pronounced cured and was released from the institution.

Under the facts and circumstances, it is clear that the appellant acquiesced in the judgment of the trial court refusing to order her release until she was cured. Since she has been granted her liberty and *48is no longer confined in the institution, it is obvious that by her voluntary actions she has secured all the relief this Court could give her under the appeal. Consequently, the case has become a moot one because the issues presented therein no longer exist.

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained and, accordingly, the appeal is dismissed ¿t the appellant’s costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6322]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Alexander Calder: The Paris Years, 1926-33,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, NY, from on or about October 16, 2008, until on or about February 15, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

Dated: August 11, 2008.

C. Miller Crouch,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E8-18952 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Paradigm  Medical  Industries,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Luis A. Mostacero,  Vice President  Finance,  Treasurer and Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

      (a)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
           the Company.




                                        /s/ Luis A. Mostacero
                                        ------------------------------------
Date: May 15, 2008                      Luis A. Mostacero
                                        Vice President of Finance, Treasurer
                                        and Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Louisa E. Fitzgerald, as Administratrix, etc., of William A. Fitzgerald, Deceased, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company and James C. Fargo, as President of the Merchants’ Dispatch Transportation Company, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18704]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Submit comments on or before October 14, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments regarding whether this information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of 
the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are 
ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the 
collection, to Delcine Montgomery, Business Development Specialist, 
Office of Native American Affairs, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, SW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delcine Montgomery, Business 
Development Specialist, Office of Native American Affairs, 202-205-
6195, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1b5b4bdb2b8bfb4ffbcbebfa5b6bebcb4a3a891a2b3b0ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c3839303f35323972313332283b3331392e251c2f3e3d723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>, Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 
202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86e5f3f4f2eff5a8f4efe5eec6f5e4e7a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7a190f080e130954081319123a09181b541d150c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Small Business Administration, 
Office of Native American Affairs (ONAA), is continuing a Native 
American initiative that will provide Native American Tribes economic 
development through the use of the Tribal Self Assessment Tool.
    Title: ``Tribal Self Assessment Tool.''
    Description of Respondents: Native Americans.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Annual Responses: 1,000.
    Annual Burden: 2,000.

Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. E8-18704 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 666

To control crime by exclusionary rule reform.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 25, 1995

Mr. MCCOLLUM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To control crime by exclusionary rule reform.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exclusionary Rule Re5 form Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. ADMISSIBILITY OF CERTAIN EVIDENCE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 223 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing:
2

•HR 666 IH

1 ‘‘§ 3510. Admissibility of evidence obtained by search

2 or seizure

3 ‘‘(a) EVIDENCE OBTAINED BY OBJECTIVELY REA4 SONABLE SEARCH OR SEIZURE.—Evidence which is ob5 tained as a result of a search or seizure shall not be ex6 cluded in a proceeding in a court of the United States

7 on the ground that the search or seizure was in violation

8 of the fourth amendment to the Constitution of the United

9 States, if the search or seizure was carried out in cir10 cumstances justifying an objectively reasonable belief that

11 it was in conformity with the fourth amendment. The fact

12 that evidence was obtained pursuant to and within the

13 scope of a warrant constitutes prima facie evidence of the

14 existence of such circumstances.

15 ‘‘(b) EVIDENCE NOT EXCLUDABLE BY STATUTE OR

16 RULE.—

17 ‘‘(1) GENERALLY.—Evidence shall not be ex18 cluded in a proceeding in a court of the United

19 States on the ground that it was obtained in viola20 tion of a statute, an administrative rule or regula21 tion, or a rule of procedure unless exclusion is ex22 pressly authorized by statute or by a rule prescribed

23 by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory author24 ity.

25 ‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE RELATING TO OBJECTIVELY

26 REASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.—Evidence
3

•HR 666 IH

1 which is otherwise excludable under paragraph (1)

2 shall not be excluded if the search or seizure was

3 carried out in circumstances justifying an objectively

4 reasonable belief that the search or seizure was in

5 conformity with the statute, administrative rule or

6 regulation, or rule of procedure, the violation of

7 which occasioned its being excludable.

8 ‘‘(c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This section shall

9 not be construed to require or authorize the exclusion of

10 evidence in any proceeding.’’.

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

12 at the beginning of chapter 223 of title 18, United States

13 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘3510. Admissibility of evidence obtained by search or seizure.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hirsch International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Gallagher, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Paul Gallagher                                                            |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Paul Gallagher, President,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer |

 

 

March 31, 2009

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### William F. Lynn, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
Exhibit 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Lowber, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  August 5, 2005                                 /s/
                                                      John M. Lowber
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      GCI, Inc.

                                       1
#### Joseph Warrine, Appellant, v. The Eagle Wagon Works, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held, that there was no liability at common law and that the case was properly submitted to the jury under the Employers’ Liability Act; * also that the notice prescribed by that act must bo served before the commencement of the action. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that service of notice under the Employers’ Liability Act simultaneously with the summons was a compliance with that statute, and that erroneous rulings upon that question and others were made in submitting the case to the jury, which require a reversal of the judgment.

*

 Laws of 1902, chap. 600.— [Rep.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1273

___________________________

James L. Toney

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Corporal Heath Dickson, Malvern Police Department; Sergeant Keith Prince,

Malvern Police Department; Assistant Chief Jim Bailey, Malvern Police Department

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

 ____________

 Submitted: November 25, 2019

Filed: December 2, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas prisoner James Toney appeals the district court’s

1

adverse grant of

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record

and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was

proper. See Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 639 F.3d 507, 514 (8th

Cir. 2011) (reviewing summary judgment decision de novo, viewing the record in the

light most favorable to the non-moving party; stating that summary judgment is

appropriate if no genuine issue of material fact exists such that the movant is entitled

to judgment as a matter of law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1The Honorable P.K. Holmes, III, United States DistrictJudge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

-2-
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47142-47143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13233-000]


ORPC Alaska, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

August 7, 2008.
    On June 2, 2008, ORPC Alaska, LLC filed an application, pursuant to 
section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the 
feasibility of the Nenana OCGen River TGU Power Project, located in the 
Tanana River, within the Unorganized Borough of Yukon-

[[Page 47143]]

Koyukuk, near Nenana, Alaska. The project uses no dam or impoundment.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) 16 proposed OCGen River 
TGU generating units, with a total installed capacity of 400 kilowatts, 
(2) a proposed 100-foot-long, 24.9-kilovolt transmission line, and (3) 
appurtenant facilities. The project is estimated to have an annual 
generation of 1,752 gigawatt-hours, which would be sold to a local 
utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Ernest Hauser, Director of Project 
Development, 15225 Carrolton Road, Rockville, MD 20853, phone: 301/518-
5073.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, (202) 502-8735.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13233) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18731 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 159 (Friday, August 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47926-47931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-35]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-35 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: August 5, 2008.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 47927]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.013


[[Page 47928]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.014


[[Page 47929]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.015


[[Page 47930]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15AU08.016


[[Page 47931]]


[FR Doc. E8-18653 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C