alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF O'SULLIVAN INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,158
<INVENTORY>                                     44,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,928
<PP&E>                                         119,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,883
<BONDS>                                         30,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,820
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,607
<SALES>                                        321,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               321,490
<CGS>                                          230,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  230,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,448
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,398
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application of Samuel P. Tull for Admission to the Bar.

Application granted. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Vitup Health Care Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Feng Gu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  May 17, 2010 /s/Feng Gu     Chief Executive Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4251

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small businesses from the required use of the electronic fund transfer system

for depository taxes, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

certain small businesses from the required use of the

electronic fund transfer system for depository taxes, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FOR SMALL BUSINESSES FROM RE4 QUIRED USE OF ELECTRONIC FUND TRANS5 FER SYSTEM.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 6302 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to use of elec8 tronic fund transfer system for collection of certain taxes)
2

•HR 4251 IH

1 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as

2 paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively, and by inserting

3 after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:

4 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION FOR SMALL DEPOSITORS.—

5 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A taxpayer who is a

6 small depositor for any calendar year shall not

7 be required to make deposits by electronic fund

8 transfer for taxes attributable to payments

9 made during the following calendar year.

10 ‘‘(B) SMALL DEPOSITOR.—A taxpayer is a

11 small depositor for any calendar year if the

12 amount of employment taxes attributable to

13 payments made by such taxpayer during such

14 year is $50,000 or less.’’

15 (b) REQUIRED PERCENTAGES OF DEPOSITS FROZEN

16 AT 1996 LEVEL.—

17 (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 6302(h)(2) of

18 such Code is amended—

19 (A) by striking ‘‘the applicable required

20 percentage’’ in clause (i) and inserting ‘‘20.1

21 percent’’, and

22 (B) by striking ‘‘the applicable required

23 percentage’’ in clause (ii) and inserting ‘‘30

24 percent’’.
3

•HR 4251 IH

1 (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(h) of such

2 Code is amended by striking subparagraph (C).

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall take effect on July 1, 1997.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3(b)


                               STATE OF DELAWARE
                           CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION
                             FROM A CORPORATION TO
                          A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
                            PURSUANT TO SECTION 266
                            OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL
                                CORPORATION LAW

1)  The name of the corporation immediately prior to filing this Certificate is
    PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY.

2)  The date the original Certificate of Incorporation was filed on is
    DECEMBER 23, 1929.

3)  The original name of the corporation as set forth in the Certificate of
    Incorporation is PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY.

4)  The name of the limited liability company as set forth in the formation is
    PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC.

5)  The conversion has been approved in accordance with the provisions of
    Section 266.


                                By:  /s/ THOMAS F. KARAM
                                   ------------------------------
                                         Authorized Officer




                                Name: /s/ THOMAS F. KARAM
                                     ------------------------------
                                        Print or Type Signature
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00418-CR

EX PARTE CRAIG E. MENDENHALL

From the 77th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 97-035-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Craig E. Mendenhall appeals from the trial court’s denial of Mendenhall’s article 

11.25 petition for writ of habeas corpus, also known as a “medical writ.” TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.25 (West 2005). By letter dated November 21, 2012, the Clerk 

of this Court notified Mendenhall that his appeal was subject to dismissal because the 

notice of appeal appeared untimely. Mendenhall was further warned that the Court 

would dismiss the appeal unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was 

filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Mendenhall filed a response but it 

does not show grounds for continuing the proceeding.
Ex parte Mendenhall Page 2

The trial court’s docket sheet indicates that Mendenhall’s petition was initially 

denied on June 25, 2012. Mendenhall presented a motion for reconsideration which was 

filed on July 6, 2012 and denied on July 13, 2012. Mendenhall contends the clerk’s 

record may have been altered and is fraudulent because the entry on the trial court’s 

docket sheet indicates that the trial court denied Mendenhall’s motion for 

reconsideration on July 12, 2012. We received a supplemental clerk’s record which 

includes the trial court’s handwritten denial, dated July 13, 2012, of the motion for 

reconsideration. Further, we have inspected the docket sheet, and although the day of 

the entry could be interpreted as a 12, we believe it is a 13, corresponding with the day 

the trial court signed the denial. 

Mendenhall’s notice of appeal was due 90 days from June 25, 2012, the date the 

trial court initially denied Mendenhall relief, which would have been September 24, 

2012.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(2). The notice of appeal was not filed until October 26, 

2012. It is untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely notice of appeal. Olivo 

v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).

This appeal is dismissed. 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

 

1 The actual due date, September 23, 2012, was a Sunday. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a).
Ex parte Mendenhall Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 27, 2012

Do not publish

[CR25]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4160
<SECURITIES>                                       510
<RECEIVABLES>                                      768
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        342
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5915
<PP&E>                                            1374
<DEPRECIATION>                                     884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              246
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                        5708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6405
<SALES>                                           3024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3024
<CGS>                                             1829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1829
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    942
<INCOME-TAX>                                       376
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                566
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       566
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .73


</TABLE>
#### Louis H. Meht, Respondent, v. Lena Meht, Appellant.

Motion granted and case set down for Wednesday, January 20,1909. Present—Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ. Jenks, J., taking no part.
EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We sent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-95072
of Landmark  Bancshares,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated  October 28, 1999
incorporated  by  reference  in this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Landmark
Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 1999.




                                        /s/Regier Carr & Monroe, L.L.P.
                                        Regier Carr & Monroe, L.L.P.


December 27, 1999
Wichita, Kansas
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-05873, 33-76120, 333-05959, 33-76122, 333-05957, 333-18935, 333-18883,
333-18885, 333-30841, 333-30211, 333-31901, 333-31895, 333-43757, 333-60365,
333-91995 and 333-84751 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No. 33-94532
on Form S-3 of Interim Services Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2000,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interim Services Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1999.


/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP


Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 13, 2000
----

**EXHIBIT**
**      32.0**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   | Date:                August 9, 2007       |   | /s/                Robert T. Strong                  |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                      |   | Robert                T. Strong                      |   |
|   |                                      |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                      |   |                                                 |   |
|   |                                      |   |                                                 |   |
|   |                                      |   |                                                 |   |
|   | Date:                August  9, 2007 |   | /s/              Diane J. Colyer                     |   |
|   |                                      |   | Diane                J. Colyer                       |   |
|   |                                      |   | Operations                Officer                    |   |
|   |                                      |   | (principal                financial officer)         |   |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. and will be      retained by Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. *
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 629

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the operation

of certain visitor facilities associated with, but outside the boundaries

of, Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of Colorado.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 23, 1995

Mr. ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate

in the operation of certain visitor facilities associated

with, but outside the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain

National Park in the State of Colorado.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘The Fall River Visitor

5 Center Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 629 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS OUTSIDE AUTHORIZED

2 BOUNDARY OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL

3 PARK.

4 (a) VISITOR CENTER.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 is authorized to collect and expend donated funds and ex6 pend appropriated funds for the operation and mainte7 nance of a visitor center to be constructed for visitors to

8 and administration of Rocky Mountain National Park

9 with private funds on the privately owned lands described

10 in subsection (b).

11 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS OF LAND.—The lands

12 referred to in subsection (a) are described as follows:

13 Being land owned by H.W. Stewart, Inc., and

14 more particularly described as follows:

15 Beginning at the southwest corner of the

16 north one-half of section 16, township 5 north,

17 range 73 west of the sixth principal meridian,

18 Colorado; thence south eighty-seven degrees six

19 minutes east, eight hundred and fifty-four feet;

20 thence north two degrees west, three hundred

21 and forty-six and one-tenth feet to the south

22 boundary of the right-of-way of U.S. Highway

23 34; thence northwesterly along said south

24 boundary nine hundred and sixty feet to the

25 west line of said section 16; thence south along
3

•HR 629 IH

1 the west line of said section 16 to the point of

2 beginning.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                    Subsidiaries of The Cerplex Group, Inc.,
                    ----------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              JURISDICTION OF
                                         ORGANIZATION AND TYPE OF
       ENTITY                                     ENTITY                OWNERSHIP
       ------                            ------------------------       ---------
<S>                                      <C>                         <C>
CERTECH Technology, Inc.                 Texas corporation           100% by Cerplex

Cerplex Mass., Inc.                      Massachusetts corporation   100% by Cerplex

Cerplex Limited                          England and Wales           100% by Cerplex
                                         corporation

Apex Computer Company                    Washington corporation      100% by Cerplex

Modcomp/Cerplex L.P. ("Modcomp")         Delaware limited            44% by Cerplex Sub and
                                         partnership                 51% by MJVI

Modcomp Canada Ltd.                      Canada corporation          100% by Modcomp

Cerplex SAS                              French corporation          100% by Cerplex and
                                                                     Cerplex Limited

Cerplex Subsidiary II, Inc.              Delaware corporation        100% by Cerplex
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

METRO REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, 

LLC,

Petitioner

v.

MICHAEL SIAWAY, DEANDRE BEMBRY, 

AND JAI WILLIAMS,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 143 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
233 So.2d 229

#### Fred McCRAE v. ALEXANDER CITY, a Municipal Corp, et al.

5 Div. 857.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 19, 1970.

H. Gerald Reynolds, Alexander City, for appellant.

Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, Jesse M. Williams, III, Montgomery, William I. Byrd, Tom Radney, Alexander City, for appellee.

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, in the Circuit Court of Tallapoosa County, here appeals from a judgment of voluntary nonsuit, with bill of exceptions, on account of an adverse ruling of the trial court on pleadings. Smith v. Louisville & N. R. Co, 208 Ala. 440, 94-So. 489; Title 7, Sec. 819, Code 1940, Recompiled in 1958.

Appellant contends by assignment of error that the trial court erred in sustaining *445defendant’s demurrer to his complaint as last amended.

The minute entry recites that the plaintiff in open court took a nonsuit, with hill of exceptions, on account of the adverse ruling of the court on the pleadings in the cause. The record shows that a demurrer was refiled to the complaint as amended.

However, no judgment appears in the record sustaining the demurrer to the complaint if it was the intention of the minutes entry to refer to such pleading. This mere reference to a ruling on the demurrer is insufficient to support the assignment of error. In order to review a ruling on demurrer there must he in the record a formal judgment of the court in that respect. Homan v. State of Alabama ex rel. Smith, 265 Ala. 17, 89 So.2d 184 (7), and cases cited.

There being nothing in the record properly inviting review, the judgment of non-suit from which this appeal is taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, MERRILL, HARWOOD and MADDOX, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PHILLIP OCAMPO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 67 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

BELL’S BREWERY, INC., Appellant,

v.

BELL HILL VINEYARDS, LLC, Appellee.

____________________

2010-1280 (Opposition No. 91177980)

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

B RUCE R. E WING , Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellant.

P HILIP C. O LSSON , Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Bode Matz PC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was G ARY H. B AISE

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L INN , P LAGER , and P ROST , Circuit Judges ). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

December 13, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
**Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Seanergy Maritime Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.     Signedon this 7th day of November, 2007         /s/ Panagiotis Zafet  Panagiotis Zafet   Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.4


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF CROWN NORTHCORP, INC.
                      ------------------------------------

Crown Revenue Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown NorthCorp, Inc.

Crown Properties, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown Revenue Services, Inc.

CRSBP Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown Revenue Services, Inc.

CNC Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown
NorthCorp, Inc.

Eastern Realty, L.L.C., a Virginia limited company, with 99% of the membership
interests owned by CNC Holding Corp., and 1% owned by Crown Revenue Services,
Inc.

Eastern Realty Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of CNC Holding Corp.

Eastern Baltimore, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
CNC Holding Corp.

CNC Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, is 50% owned by CNC
Holding Corp.