alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<CIK>                                     0000916122
<NAME>                                    USA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. II
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
<CURRENCY>                                USD

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                             1,291
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      9,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                       1,280
<INVENTORY>                                       10,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  25,857
<PP&E>                                           150,246
<DEPRECIATION>                                    51,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   493,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             31,731
<BONDS>                                          288,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         283,353
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     493,446
<SALES>                                           19,212
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 161,066
<CGS>                                             13,365
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     51,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 141,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   2,784
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                31,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (76,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (21,172)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (55,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (55,709)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.00



</TABLE>
STRATASYS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated January 31,
2007, included in this Form 10-K into the Companys previously filed S-8
Registration Statements nos. 33-93362, 333-32782, and 333-116210 and the
previously filed S-3 registration statement no. 333-108816.

|                           | /s/ Rothstein, Kass &
      Company, P.C.
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------------------
|                          
|Roseland, New
      Jersey |                                          
|March 13,
      2008       |                                          

---
#### McDaniel, Appellant, *v.*McDaniel.

*Will*— Devise—Li,fe *estate*— Contingent *remainder.*

Where a testator devises land to a son for the term of his natural life, and on his decease to the children of his son then living, and the children of such of them as shall then be dead, and if the son should die without having such child or children or grandchildren, then the property should go to other children and grandchildren of the testator, the son takes an estate for life and if he survives his father, has a child which dies, and then dies himself, the other children and grandchildren of the testator named in the will take the remainder.

Argued Oct. 24, 1907.

Appeal, No. 148, Oct. T., 1907, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., Aug. T., 1907, No. 19, for defendants on case stated in suit of Mary M. McDaniel v. Andrew McDaniel.

Before Mitchell, C. J., Fell, Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Stewart, JJ.

Affirmed.

Case stated on a rule to settle title under the Act of June 10, 1893, P. L. 415.

Before Taylor, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*372
      *Error assigned*was in entering judgment for defendants.

*James A. Magill,*for appellant.

*James P.*Eagleson, for appellees.

January 6, 1908:

Per Curiam,

The devise of one tract to Joseph McDaniel through whom, the plaintiff claims was “ for the term of his natural life and no longer,” with remainders “to the children of my.said son Joseph McDaniel then living, and the children of such of them as shall then be dead. . . . And if my said son Joseph shall die without having such child or children and grandchildren, then the said properties are to go to the children of my son Andrew M’Danel, then living, and the children of such of them as shall then be dead.”

The devise of the other tract was to “Joseph for the term of his natural life, .... and after the death of my said son Joseph, then the last described property shall go to his children then living, and the children of such of them as shall then be deceased, in equal parts or shares; but if my son Joseph should die, not then having any living children or any children of a deceased child, of his, then the'last described property "shall go to my two sons Eobert and Andrew for their lives, and for the life of the survivor, etc.

The devises were of a definite life estate and the remainders contingent, on the existence of children or grandchildren of Joseph at his death. Nothing could be clearer than the testator’s actual intent that-the event on which the contingency depended was not his own death but that of Joseph, the life tenant. Joseph had a child, but she died before he did, and when the time for determining the contingency arrived there was no child or grandchild of Joseph “then living” and by the clear expression of the testator’s intent the remainder-men under the will were his sons Robert and Andrew and the latter’s children: Wood v. Schoen, 216 Pa. 425.

Judgment affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ORANGE AND
ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      902,297
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     17,515
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         204,339
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       160,535
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,284,686
<COMMON>                                        68,271
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      127,521
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            189,469
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 385,261
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              394
<PREFERRED>                                     42,844
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           281,675
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               3,330
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  98,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   78,074
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 394,208
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,284,686
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      243,302
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,905
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     220,916
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     225,821
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         17,481
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (2,577)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  14,904
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7,988
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,916
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        700
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    6,216
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         8,807
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        6,150
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           6,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   SUBSIDIARY                                      STATE OF INCORPORATION                      DOES BUSINESS AS
------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------

<S>                                                <C>                                       <C>
   Arch Communications Enterprises LLC              Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Arch Wireless Communications, Inc.               Delaware
   Arch Connecticut Valley, Inc.                    Massachusetts                             Arch Wireless Holdings
   Arch Wireless Holdings, Inc.                     Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Benbow Investments, Inc.                         Delaware
   MobileMedia Communications, Inc.                 Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   MobileMedia Communications Corporation of
     America                                        Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   MobileMedia License Co., LLC                     Delaware
   Paging Network, Inc.                             Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   PageNet, Inc.                                    Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Paging Network of America, Inc.                  Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Paging Network of Colorado, Inc.                 Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Paging Network of Northern California, Inc.      Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Paging Network of Michigan, Inc.                 Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings
   Paging Network Finance Corp.                     Delaware
   Paging Network International, Inc.               Delaware
   Paging Network of San Francisco, Inc.            Delaware                                  Arch Wireless Holdings

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Ampersand Medical
Corporation Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) for June 30, 2000 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the Six-Months ended June
30, 2000 and is qualifed in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              56
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,346
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                        204
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,747
<PP&E>                                             367
<DEPRECIATION>                                      87
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,951
<SALES>                                            541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   541
<CGS>                                              349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,973
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,785)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
#### George F. Pantzer, Appellant, v. Charles Schmidt, Respondent.

Judgement of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000915909
<NAME>                        HIRSCH INTERNATIONAL CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,290,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,925,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (5,632,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 25,711,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,973,000
<PP&E>                                      14,302,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (7,758,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,216,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,346,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,158,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,216,000
<SALES>                                     86,958,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            90,821,000
<CGS>                                       59,846,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              100,337,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (455,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,308,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,369,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   972,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,635,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (2,187,000)
<NET-INCOME>                                (13,822,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.48)


</TABLE>
Order entered February 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00197-CR

TYRAN DARNELL SHUMATE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-75398-Q

ORDER

Tryan Darnell Shumate timely filed a pro se notice of appeal. See Taylor v. State, 424 

S.W.3d 39, 44-45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to 

determine whether appellant is entitled to court-appointed counsel in this appeal. If the trial 

court finds that appellant is entitled to court-appointed counsel, we ORDER the trial court to 

appoint an attorney to represent appellant in the appeal. If the trial court finds that appellant is 

not entitled to court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall determine whether appellant will 

retain counsel to represent him in the appeal and, if so, the name, State Bar number, and contact 

information for retained counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the hearing, including findings of fact, 

any orders, and any supporting documentation, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Tammy Kemp, 

Presiding Judge, 204th Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; and 

Kendra Thibodeaux, official court reporter, 204th Judicial District Court; and Christina O’Neil, 

Senior Staff Attorney Criminal District Courts.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with the order. The appeal will 

be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever 

is earlier.

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# VIRGINIA:

In the Court of Appeals of Virginia on Tuesday 

### the 26th 

### day of July , 20 22

.

Paul H. Lundmark, Appellant,

against Record No. 0677

- 21

- 2

Circuit Court No. CR21

- 299

- 00M

Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellee.

Upon a Petition for Rehearing En Banc

Before Chief Judge Decker, Judges Humphreys, Beales, Huff, O’Brien, AtLee, Malveaux,

Athey, Fulton, Ortiz, Causey, Friedman, Chaney, Raphael, Lorish

, Callins and White

On April 12, 2022, the Court granted the appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and ordered

briefing as to whether this Court ha s jurisdiction over this case.

Having received the briefs of the appellant, Henrico County, and the Attorney General, and

considering that Henrico County has now expressly waive d any defect associated with the notice of appeal,

the Court has determined that it has jurisdiction over this case

. See Nicholson v. Commonwealth , 300 Va. 17,

24 (2021). Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated on the docket of the Court. The time for filing the opening

brief in this case shall re commence from the date of entry of this order.

Upon further conside ration whereof, the style of this case hereby is amended to reflect that Henrico

County is the proper appellee and shall hereinafter be styled as Paul H. Lundmark v. Henrico County

. T he

Commonwealth’s Attorney for Henrico County represents the appellee , a nd the Attorney General is relieved

of any further involv ement in this case.

A Copy,

Teste:

A. John Vollino, Clerk

original order signed by a deputy clerk of the

By: Court of Appeals of Virginia at the direction

of the Court

Deputy Cler k PUBLISHED
ex_172173.htm


 


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Exhibit 10.23


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO BANK 34


DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT


 


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") is adopted April 26, 2019, by Bank 34, located in Alamogordo, New Mexico (the "Bank") and Jill Gutierrez (the "Executive").


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive are party to a Deferred Compensation Agreement adopted February 1, 2010 (the "Agreement"); and


 


WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to (i) change the time and form of the Executive's benefit payable under Section 4.4.2 (Change in Control Benefit) in accordance with the requirements of Agreement Section 4.8, relating to a Change in Form or Timing of Distributions;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Bank and the Executive adopt the following amendments to the Agreement:


 


Section 4.4.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced by the following:


 


Section 4.4.2 Distribution of Benefits. The Bank shall distribute the benefit to the Executive in one hundred twenty (120) monthly installments commencing within thirty (30) days following the fifth-year anniversary of the Executive's Separation from Service, in accordance with the requirement of Section 4.8 of the Agreement for "Changes in form or Timing of Distributions."


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized representative of the Bank have executed this Second Amendment as indicated below:


 


 


    Executive                                                                                                   Bank


 


    /s/ Jill Gutierrez____________                                                                 By: /s/ Jan R. Thiry________________


 


                                                                                                                       Its: /s/ EVP & CFO _______________
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

s0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141128

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141128 COA: 296570 Kent CC: 08-010809-FC WILLIAM ANTHONY SEYMOUR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the April 2, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS



### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not par ticipating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).