Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 22 / Friday, February 1, 2008 / Notices 6213 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–62,597; Parma Corporation, 

Denton, NC. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–62,400; Janesville Acoustics, 

Grand Rapids, MI. 

TA–W–62,541; GE Consumer and 

Industrial, Electrical Equipment 

Division, West Burlington, IA. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–62,341; Nortel Networks 

Corporation, Global Order 

Fulfillment, Research Triangle Park, 

NC. 

TA–W–62,479; Grand Knitting Mills, 

Blueberry Boulevard, LLC, 

Amityville, NY. 

TA–W–62,493; Electronic Data Systems, 

Computer Operators of the 

Mainframe Disaster, Recovery 

Testing for GM, Flint, MI. 

TA–W–62,599; J.C. Matthews and 

Company, Inc., Galax, VA. 

TA–W–62,627; Newton Transportation 

Company, Inc., Hudson, NC. 

TA–W–62,675; Syncreon-US, JNAP 

Operation, Division of Syncreon 

Automotive, Detroit, MI. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of January 14 through January 18, 2008. 

Copies of these determinations are available 

for inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 during 

normal business hours or will be mailed to 

persons who write to the above address. 

Dated: January 24, 2008. 

Ralph DiBattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8–1825 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–62,677] 

Llink Technologies, LLC, Brown City, 

MO; Notice of Termination of 

Investigation 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on January 

14, 2008 in response to a petition filed 

by a company official on behalf of 

workers of Llink Technologies, LLC, 

Brown City, Missouri. 

The Department has determined that 

this petition is a photocopy of petition 

number TA–W–62,630, instituted on 

January 3, 2008. The investigation of 

that petition is ongoing and 

determination has not yet been issued. 

Therefore, further investigation in the 

case would serve no purpose, and this 

investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of 

January, 2008. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8–1828 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–62,703] 

Syngenta Inc. Crop Protection 

Division, Bucks, AL; Notice of 

Termination of Investigation 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on January 

18, 2008 in response to a petition filed 

by a company official on behalf of 

workers of Syngenta Inc., Crop 

Protection Division, Bucks, Alabama. 

The petitioning group of workers is 

covered by an active certification (TA–

W–59,181), which expires on April 21, 

2008. Consequently, further 

investigation in this case would serve 

no purpose, and the investigation has 

been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of 

January 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8–1823 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–62,670] 

Visteon Concordia VRAP, Concordia, 

MO; Notice of Termination of 

Investigation 

Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on January 

14, 2008 in response to a petition filed 

by the International Union, United 

Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural 

Implement Workers of America on 

behalf of workers of Visteon Concordia 

VRAP, Concordia, Missouri. 

The petitioner has requested that the 

petition be withdrawn. Consequently, 

the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of 

January, 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E8–1827 Filed 1–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–61,760] 

Hutchinson Technology, Eau Claire, 

WI; Notice of Negative Determination 

on Remand 

On November 6, 2007, the U.S. Court 

of International Trade (USCIT) granted 

the U.S. Department of Labor’s motion 

for a voluntary remand in Former 

Employees of Hutchinson Technology v. 

U.S. Secretary of Labor, Court No. 07–

335. 

On June 21, 2007, a TAA Coordinator 

for the State of Wisconsin filed a 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES