alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, S. Scott Crump, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Stratasys, Inc. (the
"registrant");

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of and for the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors:

     a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: March 12, 2004                       /s/ S. SCOTT CRUMP
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           S. Scott Crump
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
      Line
      Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Robert O. Bond, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.





/s/
      ROBERT O. BOND


Name:
      Robert O. Bond


Title:
      President and Chief Operating Officer


Date:
      November 9, 2005














This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50614

USDC No. SA-98-CV-20

 

ANDRÉ TIMON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ADAM RICO VELA; LUPE LOZANO, Warden;

WAYNE SCOTT, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

February 23, 1999

Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Texas state prisoner (# 613824) André

Timon’s application for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP)

is DENIED and his appeal is DISMISSED, because he failed to file

a notice of appeal from the district court’s final judgment filed

April 3, 1998. 

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
175 La. 677

#### STATE of Louisiana v. James E. McCAULEY.

No. 31983.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 31, 1932.

Thomas W. Robertson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., and James U. Galloway, Dist. Atty., Nash Johnson, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Shreveport, and James O’Niell, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., for the Staté.

O’NIELL, C. J.

The appellant was convicted of breaking and entering a store, in the nighttime, with intent to commit larceny. The only bill of exceptions in the record has reference to a statement made by the district attorney to the defendant, on cross-examination, viz.: “Now you know that you had stopped off in Shreveport on your way to pull a job of robbery. at McComb City, Miss.” The objection made to the statement was that there was no evidence of any such fact, and that the statement of the supposed fact was prejudicial to the defendant. The judge sustained the objection and immediately instructed the jury to disregard the statement of the district attorney and to draw no inference from it prejudicial to the defendant. We have no reason to doubt that the judge’s prompt admonition to the jury served its purpose, or that the defendant was not prejudiced by the district attorney’s statement.

The verdict and sentence are affirmed.
#### BACHE *&*CO., INCORPORATED, Appellee-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORPORATION, Appellant-Appellee.

No. 202, Docket 72-1454.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Dec. 11, 1972.

Decided Dec. 15, 1972.

Howard T. Milman, Sullivan & Cromwell, Joel M. Miller, New York City, for appellee-appellant.

James A. Hourihan, Washington, D. C. (Hogan & Hartson, David A. Ludtke, Washington, D. C., Cahill, Gordon, Son-nett, Reindel & Óhl, David R. Hyde, Allen S. Joslyn, New York City, on the ■ brief), for appellant-appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment on Judge Lev-et’s opinions below, 339 F.Supp. 341 (S.D.N.Y.1972); 324 F.Supp. 998 (S.D. N.Y.1971).
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightning Gaming, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  (the “Report”), each of us certifies as of the date hereof, solely for the purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, to the best of our respective knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





Date: May 17, 2010


By:  /s/ Brian Haveson


Brian Haveson


Chief Executive Officer








Date:  May 17, 2010


By:  /s/ Robert Ciunci


Robert Ciunci


Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20134

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FEDERICO LUERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:05-CR-133-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Federico Luera

raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v.

Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render

21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s

motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114987, Registration Statement No. 333-55836 and Registration Statement No. 333-62585 ofThe Pantry, Inc. on Forms S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-116972 of The Pantry, Inc. on Form S-3, as amended, of our report dated December 10, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatedto the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143, *Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations*, on September 27, 2002) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Pantry, Inc. for the year endedSeptember 30, 2004. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & ToucheLLP 

 

Raleigh, North Carolina 

December 14, 2004
18462.

#### JACKSON *v.*BALKCOM, Warden.

*413Argued January 12, 1954

Decided February 9, 1954

Rehearing denied February 24, 1954.

*414
      *Frank A. Dilworth, III,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, J. T. Grice, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, Robert Hall, Lamar Sizemore, Assistant Attorney s-General,*contra.

Head, Justice..

The only contention made by the petitioner for habeas corpus in the present case as to the illegality of his trial and conviction in the Superior Court of Baldwin County for the offense of rape is that, under the provisions of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 291-311; Code, Ann. Supp., Ch. 24-24), the superior court was without jurisdiction to try his case.

In *Hampton*v. *Stevenson,*210 *Ga.*87 (78 S. E. 2d 32), it was held that proceedings under the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 are civil and not criminal, and that such proceedings do not, therefore, violate the Constitution which provides, in article VI, section IV, paragraph I (Code, Ann., § 2-3901), that “The Superior Courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction ... in criminal cases where the offender is subjected to loss of life, or confinement in the penitentiary.”

While there is language in sections 9, 10, 11, and 19 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 which might indicate that it was the intention of the General Assembly to give original jurisdiction to the juvenile courts in all cases pertaining to criminal charges against persons less than seventeen years of age, there is nothing in the act which would have the effect of repealing Code § 26-301, which states the age of criminal responsibility to be “14 years, or before that age if such person know the distinction between good and evil.” Jurisdiction to try persons charged with felonies, who are accountable under the law, is fixed by the Constitution to be in the superior courts. Constitution, art. VI, sec. IV, par. I (Code, Ann., § 2-3901).

This court is entirely in sympathy with the beneficent purposes of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951. However, we can only uphold the purposes of the act consistent with our Constitution. Should any of the provisions of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 have been intended to withdraw the jurisdiction of the superior *415courts to try an offender, within the age of accountability under the law, for an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment, as contended by the petitioner, such provisions would be unconstitutional and could be given no effect. *Law*v. *McCord,*143 *Ga.*822 (85 S. E. 1025); *Hicks*v. *State,*146 *Ga.*706 (92 S. E. 216); *Williams*v. *Davidson,*147 *Ga.*491 (94 S. E. 564); *Thomas*v. *State,*174 *Ga.*654 (163 S. E. 734); *Mills*v. *State,*56 *Ga. App.*390 (192 S. E. 730).

The petition for habeas corpus showed no valid reason why the detention of the petitioner was illegal, and the trial court properly sustained the demurrer and remanded the petitioner to the respondent.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


February 11, 2020


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 463 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on February 10, 2020, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-234725) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO_________________


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
EXHIBIT 23




<PAGE>

                INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  statement  No.
33-95072 of Landmark  Bancshares,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated  October
26,  2000  incorporated  by  reference  in this  Annual  Report  on Form 10-K of
Landmark Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2000.




                                     /s/Regier Carr & Monroe, L.L.P.
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Regier Carr & Monroe, L.L.P.



December 21, 2000
Wichita, Kansas
**Exhibit 32.2**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WABCO Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ulrich Michel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

Dated: August 7, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 419 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 419

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 19, 1995

 Received, read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
              For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Finding.--The Congress finds that Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., 
of St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily performed emergency work after 
the Northridge earthquake, but has not been reimbursed as a result of a 
technicality under California State law.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to fairly compensate 
Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for which, except for the 
technicality under California State law, it would otherwise have been 
paid under the provisions of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121).

SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
shall pay to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an 
amount equal to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., by 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of California to 
compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the emergency work and 
services performed at the request of the Southern California Regional 
Rail Authority, to the extent that such work and services are otherwise 
eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121). The payment shall be made 
from funds appropriated to implement such Act.
    (b) Deobligation of Funds.--The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
shall deobligate an equal amount to that obligated previously for 
payment to the State of California to cover the costs of work performed 
for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority by Benchmark Rail 
Group, Inc., after the Northridge earthquake which would have been 
eligible for reimbursement under such Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 19, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         561,287
<SECURITIES>                                   538,188
<RECEIVABLES>                                  583,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,231
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,212,647
<PP&E>                                       2,591,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                 426,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,830,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,969,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        413
<COMMON>                                     4,666,667
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,085,122)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,830,496
<SALES>                                     12,107,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,107,662
<CGS>                                       11,193,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  713,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             290,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (183,616)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (183,616)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (183,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                                             |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Thomas      A. Rose                                     |   |
|                    |   | Thomas      A. Rose                                              |   |
|                    |   | Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |                                                             |   |