alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KALU Exhibit 10.11 - 3.31.2014 - 10-Q






Exhibit 10.11


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS 


Effective as of June 4, 2013


     Each non-employee director of Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) shall receive: 


		
	•
	an annual retainer of $45,000 per year;


		
	•
	an annual grant of restricted stock having a value equal to $95,000;


		
	•
	a fee of $1,500 per day for each meeting of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) attended in person and $750 per day for each such meeting attended by phone; and


		
	•
	a fee of $1,500 per day for each committee meeting of the board of directors attended in person ($2,000 per day for each such audit committee meeting) and $750 per day for each such meeting attended by phone ($1,000 per day for each such audit committee meeting).




     In addition, the Lead Independent Director shall receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000, the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000 and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board shall receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000, with all such amounts payable at the same time as the annual retainer. Each non-employee director may elect to receive shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company in lieu of any or all of his or her annual retainer, including any additional annual retainer for service as the Lead Independent Director or the Chairman of a committee. 


     The payment of annual retainers (including any additional annual retainers) and the annual grant of restricted stock shall be made each year on the date on which the Company holds its annual meeting of stockholders or such other date as the Board may determine. The number of shares of common stock to be received in the grant of restricted stock, as well as the number of shares of common stock to be received by any non-employee director electing to receive common stock in lieu of any or all of his or her payment of annual retainer (including any additional annual retainer), shall be based on the average of the closing prices per share of common stock for the 20 trading days prior to the date such grant and payments are made. 


     The Company shall reimburse all directors for travel and other disbursements relating to meetings of the Board and committees thereof, and non-employee directors shall be provided accident insurance with respect to Company-related business travel.
exhibit_10-1.htm










EXHIBIT 10.1


 


English summary of the Lease Agreement, dated September 13, 2012, between the Israeli Land Authority (the “Landlord”), as landlord, and Mapi - Pharma Ltd. (the “Company”), as tenant (the “Lease”).


 



	  	
·

	
Premises Covered by the Lease: Under the Lease, approximately 8,547 square meters (approximately 92,000 square feet) of land, located in Ramat Hovav, Israel, is leased to the Company (the “Premises”).







 



	  	
·

	
Permitted Use of Lease Premises: Medicine Production Plant.







 



	  	
·

	
Payment: Company shall pay the Premises rental fees at their present value upfront for the full duration of the Lease an amount of approximately NIS 428,000. Such payment may need to be supplemented, in accordance with the agreement, subject to the appreciation of the property value.







 



	  	
·

	
Terms of the Lease: The term of the Lease is deemed retroactively to have commenced on August 28, 2012, the date of the transaction approval, and terminates on August 27, 2061.







 



	  	
·

	
Termination: The Landlord is entitled to terminate the Lease in the event that the Company has not completed the construction of the Plant by August 27, 2015.
#### Simon Flores v. State.

No. 25068.

January *17,*1951.

*Arthur C. Gonzales,*Del Rio, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted for robbery by assault and was by the jury convicted of an aggravated assault and given a penalty of a $1,000.00 fine and' confinement in the county jail for two years.

This indictment merely charges a simple assault and a robbery thereby. It contains none of the elements of an aggravated assault.

Under the case of Foreman v. State, 57 S.W. 843, on motion for a rehearing, it was held that a charge of robbery by assault with no allegations relative to the use of a deadly weapon, nor further description of the assault, such indictment did not include the elements of an aggravated assault. See Munson v. State, 21 Tex. App. 329, 17 S.W. 251; Huntsman v. State, 12 Tex. App. 619. This matter was fully discussed in the recent case of Tomlin v. State, 155 Texas Crim. Rep. 207; 233 S. W. (2d) 303.

*392Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present instance will be reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Frank Griffin, Respondent, v. William McMahon, Personally and as Administrator, etc., of Teresa McMahon, Deceased, and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with Martha A. Mallory, Appellant.

Orders affirmed, without costs. All concurred; Robson, J., not sitting.
#### In the Matter of William Victor, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[680 NYS2d 118]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with and found guilty of possessing a weapon in violation of prison disciplinary rules after a razor blade was found secreted in his mouth. Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt and we confirm. To the extent that petitioner raised an issue of substantial evidence, we conclude that the detailed misbehavior report, together with the corroborating unusual incident report, memoranda and testimony presented at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin,*76 NY2d 964). We reject petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer’s failure to inquire as to why the witnesses requested would not testify denied petitioner the right to call witnesses. The record establishes that petitioner waived any objection in this regard by acquiescing to the witnesses’ refusal to testify without requesting further inquiry and indicating his willingness to proceed with the hearing *(see, Matter of McClean v LeFevre,*142 AD2d 911, 912). We find petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias and assertion that the hearing transcript *972is incomplete, to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
No. 07
- 16
- 00110
- CV

In the Interest of L.R., a Child § § § § From the 99th District Court of Lubbock County April 14, 2016 Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated April 14, 2016 , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended for which let execution issue.
It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.
o O o
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 06/76-0330]


SunTx Fulcrum Fund II--SBIC, L.P.; Notice Seeking Exemption Under 
Section 312 of the Small Business Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that SunTx Fulcrum Fund II--SBIC, L.P., Two 
Lincoln Centre, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1000, Dallas, Texas 75240, a 
Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as 
amended (``the Act''), in connection with the financing of a small 
concern, has sought SBA's prior written approval under section 312 of 
the Act and section 107.730(d), Financings with Associates, of the 
Small Business Administration (``SBA'') rules and regulations (13 CFR 
107.730 (2002)). SunTx Fulcrum Fund II--SBIC, L.P. proposes to invest 
in NationsBuilders Insurance Services, Inc. (``NBIS''). The financing 
will provide the funding for the information system improvement and 
growth of the business.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Section 107.730(d) 
of the Regulations because SunTx Fulcrum Fund, L.P. and SunTx Fulcrum 
Dutch Investors, L.P., Associates of SunTx Fulcrum Fund II--SBIC, L.P., 
own more than 5% of outstanding ownership of NBIS. Therefore, this 
transaction is considered as a financing with Associates requiring 
SBA's prior approval.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction, within 15 days of the date of this 
publication, to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small 
Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: July 9, 2008.
A. Joseph Shepard,
Associate Administrator For Investment.
[FR Doc. E8-18522 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit
31.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Brian L. Klemsz, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify
that:





1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-a5(e)) for the
small business issuer and have;





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure the material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or person performing the
equivalent functions);





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process
summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over
financial reporting.







Date:  May
13,
2008




/s/ Brian L.
Klemsz


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4343 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4343

 To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from making American communities 
 non-competitive by using shipping cost differentials attributable to 
           the application of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 1996

Mr. Underwood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from making American communities 
 non-competitive by using shipping cost differentials attributable to 
           the application of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON MAKING COMPARISONS UNDER THE JONES ACT.

    The Secretary of Defense, when making cost analysis or business 
comparisons between United States and foreign bases for the supply of 
United States Navy activities, may not use shipping cost differentials 
that are attributable to the application of the Merchant Marine Act, 
1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 861 et seq.) to the United States bases.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 38 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 38 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 38 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 38 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 38 Filed 09/23/2009 Page 5 of 5
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


            We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in the  registration
statement on Form S-8 of Development  Bancorp,  Ltd. of our report dated June 7,
1997 on our  audit  of the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Development
Bancorp,  Ltd. as of and for the years ended  December 31, 1996 and 1995,  which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.



SILVERMAN OLSON THORVILSON & KAUFMANN LTD
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Minneapolis, Minnesota
July __, 1997

                                                              

<PAGE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 605

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to require certain legal

aliens to reside in the United States for a period of 5 consecutive

years to be eligible for a preference for occupancy in public housing

or for the provision of rental housing assistance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 1995

Mr. GREENWOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the United States Housing Act of 1937 to require

certain legal aliens to reside in the United States for

a period of 5 consecutive years to be eligible for a preference for occupancy in public housing or for the provision of rental housing assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PUBLIC HOUSING PREFERENCES.

4 Section 6(c)(4)(A) of the United States Housing Act

5 of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437d(c)(4)(A)) is amended—

6 (1) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;
2

•HR 605 IH

1 (2) in clause (iv), by striking the period at the

2 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

3 (3) by inserting after clause (iv) the following

4 new clause:

5 ‘‘(v) prohibit any alien described in

6 subsection (a) of section 214 of the Hous7 ing and Community Development Act of

8 1980 from having a preference under any

9 provision of this subparagraph unless such

10 alien has maintained continuous residence

11 in the States for not less than 5 years;’’.

12 SEC. 2. RENTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PREFERENCES.

13 Section 8(d)(1)(A) of the United States Housing Act

14 of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(d)(1)(A)) is amended—

15 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end;

16 (2) in clause (iii), by inserting ‘‘and’’ after the

17 semicolon at the end; and

18 (3) by adding after clause (iii) the following

19 new clause:

20 ‘‘(iv) prohibit any alien described in sub21 section (a) of section 214 of the Housing and

22 Community Development Act of 1980 from hav23 ing a preference under any provision of this

24 subparagraph unless such alien has maintained
3

•HR 605 IH

1 continuous residence in the States for not less

2 than 5 years;’’.

Æ
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 7294

BERWYN ROBINSON
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
ALEXANDER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; KENNETH BEAVER
,
Defendants

- Appellees
,
and

HARRIS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
, at Statesville

. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. ( 5:18

- cv

- 00072

- FDW )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 9, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Berwyn Robinson , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Berwyn Robinson appea ls the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its prior order. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). We review a district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b) for abuse

of discretion. Ball ard v. Carlson , 882 F.2d 93, 95 (4th Cir. 1989). We have reviewed the

record and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Robinson v. Alexander Corr. Inst. , No. 5:18

- cv

- 00072

- FDW
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 1 8, 2018). We deny Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel

.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Richard Korkemas v. Elias Macksoud.

Application granted. Order signed.
##### 



Exhibit 11
 RTW, INC.AND SUBSIDARY
Statement Regarding Computation of Basic And Income Per Share
 2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    
    
    5,233,326
    
    
    
    5,399,468
    
    
    
    5,323,448Stock warrants
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Stock optionsOptions at $10.75
    
    
    
    
    
    
    200
    
    
    
    155Options at $9.95
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1Options at $9.87
    
    
    
    
    
    
    453
    
    
    
    Options at $9.50
    
    
    
    
    
    
    323
    
    
    
    354Options at $8.81
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6,276
    
    
    
    4,532Options at $8.75
    
    
    
    
    
    
    106
    
    
    
    109Options at $6.50
    
    
    613
    
    
    
    4,528
    
    
    
    2,492Options at $6.45
    
    
    479
    
    
    
    3,664
    
    
    
    141Options at $6.18
    
    
    11,976
    
    
    
    53,569
    
    
    
    49,223Options at $6.00
    
    
    10,415
    
    
    
    41,128
    
    
    
    26,852Options at $5.33
    
    
    239
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Options at $4.50
    
    
    1,498
    
    
    
    2,513
    
    
    
    2,398Options at $3.80
    
    
    10,916
    
    
    
    15,679
    
    
    
    15,727Options at $3.13
    
    
    6,700
    
    
    
    8,661
    
    
    
    5,643Options at $2.60
    
    
    10,140
    
    
    
    5,085
    
    
    
    1,575Options at $2.42
    
    
    9,574
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Options at $2.20
    
    
    13,477
    
    
    
    15,683
    
    
    
    9,849Options at $2.19
    
    
    73,726
    
    
    
    53,390
    
    
    
    38,117Options at $2.00
    
    
    476
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Options at $1.98
    
    
    103,317
    
    
    
    51,883
    
    
    
    20,632Weighted average common and common
share equivalents outstanding
    
    
    5,486,872
    
    
    
    5,662,609
    
    
    
    5,501,248Net income (loss) ($000s)
    
    $
    9,941
    
    
    $
    5,998
    
    
    $
    3,288Income per share:Basic income per share
    
    $
    1.90
    
    
    $
    1.11
    
    
    $
    0.62Diluted income per share
    
    $
    1.81
    
    
    $
    1.06
    
    
    $
    0.60
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert O. Bond, as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   ROBERT O. BOND


Robert O. Bond


President and Chief Operating Officer





August 5, 2010











This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.