alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 632 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 187
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 632

                          [Report No. 104-373]

   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 1995

  Mr. Frost introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 30, 1995

   Additional sponsors: Mr. Fields of Texas, and Mr. Bryant of Texas

                           November 30, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUST COMPENSATION.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end of the first paragraph the following: 
``Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner's 
reasonable costs, including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and 
attorneys, in pursuing the action if the owner is an independent 
inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no more than 
500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or 
manufacture of the patented invention by or for the United States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to actions under section 1498(a) of title 28, United States Code, 
that are pending on, or brought on or after, January 1, 1995.
                                     

                                                 Union Calendar No. 187

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 632

                          [Report No. 104-373]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To enhance fairness in compensating owners of patents used by the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 30, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
#### Frederick D. Foster and Another v. Augusta D. Jones and Others.

Motion granted and time to file and serve printed record on appeal extended to May 1, 1909. Settle order on notice.
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Red Pearl
      Acquisition Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, I certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Red Pearl Acquisition Corp. for
              the
              quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operations of Red Pearl Acquisition
              Corp..
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Bruce BrandtName:
            Bruce
                BrandtTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            August
                17, 2007
Order entered April 20, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00127 - CV MATTHEW SIDWELL, Appellant

V. ZUO MODERN CONTEMPOR ARY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 17 - 03192 - E

ORDER The clerk’s record that has been filed in this appeal does not include a copy of the appealed order, the trial court’s order granting defendant’s amended tradition a l and no

- evidence m otions for summary judgment. Accordingly, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c)(1), we ORDER Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of the summary judgment order no lat er than May 4, 2020

. The clerk’srecord shall also contain a copy of the amended summary judgment motions and

the October 28, 2019 “ order

– judge’s ruling. ” We note the deadline for filing appellant’s brief has been set for May 6, 2020. However, b ecause the clerk’s record is not complete, appellant’s br ief is not yet due and appellant need not file his brief. The court will set the deadline for filing appellant’s brief once the record is complete and the Court has determined whether it has jurisdiction over the appeal

. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Warren and the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
Sam Kan & Company 1151 Harbor Bay Pkwy., Suite 101 Alameda, CA 94502  Phone: 510.517.7874 Fax: 866.848.1224 http://www.skancpa.com [ex232009001.jpg] We consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Bancorp Energy, Inc. (hereinafter the Company) of our report dated July 28, 2011, with respect to the balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders (deficit) equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and for the period since re-entering the development stage on September 30, 2003 to December 31, 2009 to be included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K). [ex232009002.jpg] Firms Manual Signature Alameda, CA City, State July 28, 2011 Date
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010, each of the undersigned, Lawrence J. LeBon, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John LeBlanc, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, III                       
|                   |  |     |  | Lawrence J. LeBon, III                           
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ John LeBlanc                                 
|                   |  |     |  | John LeBlanc                                     
|                   |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Exhibit 24
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  /s/ James E. Berry, II
    
    January 27, 2010James E. Berry II, Director/s/ Tom D. Berry
    
    January 27, 2010Tom D. Berry, Director/s/ Joe Berry Cannon
    
    January 27, 2010Joe Berry Cannon, Director/s/ John Cohlmia
    
    January 27, 2010John Cohlmia, Director/s/ David S. Crockett Jr.
    
    January 27, 2010David S. Crockett Jr., Director/s/ J. Berry Harrison
    
    January 27, 2010J. Berry Harrison, Director/s/ James M. Johnson
    
    January 27, 2010James M. Johnson, Director/s/ David P. Lambert
    
    January 27, 2010David P. Lambert, Director/s/ Linford R. Pitts
    
    January 27, 2010Linford R. Pitts, Director/s/ Robert B. Rodgers
    
    January 27, 2010Robert B. Rodgers, Director/s/ Russell W. Teubner
    
    January 27, 2010Russell W. Teubner, Director 3
#### O. M. Adams, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William R. Payson, defendant in error.

*Error to Madison.*

Where a master included a fee for §30 00 to the complainant’s solicitor, upon a reforence to him to compute the amount due, upon a hill taken *fro confesso,*where the hill did not claim such fee, it was decided to he error.

*27This was a hill in chancery, in the Madison county Circuit Court, to foreclose a mortgage filed by Payson against Adams, which came on to be heard before Kcerner, Judge, at the August term, A. D. 1848, and a decree of foreclosure was allowed. The facts of the case, and the errors complained of, will be sufficiently stated in the opinion.

L. Davis and N. Edwards, for plaintiff in error.

L. F. Casey, for defendant in error.

Opinion by Mr. Justice Catón :

In this case, we have again to reiterate a principle so familiar that authority in its support would be superfluous.

This bill is to foreclose a mortgage, given to secure, among other things, the payment of a promissory note; the non-payment of which is alone complained of. The bill was taken for confessed, and it was referred to a master, to compute the amount due upon the note; and to assess and tax the fee of the complainant’s solicitor, according to an agreement filed in the cause, by which the defendant bound himself to pay such fee, in case the complainant had to foreclose the mortgage.

This agreement was executed some time after the mortgage, and before the commencement of this suit, and is not referred to in or made a part of the bill; nor was it ever placed upon the files of the Court, till more than two months after the bill was filed.

The master reported the amount due upon th’e note at í¿ 464 47; and that he had taxed the fee of the complainant’s solicitor at thirty dollars. For both of which sums the decree was rendered.

That portion of the decree, alone, is assigned for error, which directs the defendant to pay the solicitor’s fee of thirty dollars. That part of the decree must undoubtedly be reversed. No claim for that fee is set up in the bill, and the defendant had no opportunity of defending that claim. The Court could not give the complainant more than he asked, and showed, by his bill, that he was entitled to.

That portion of the plea complained of must be reversed, and the residue stand affirmed. The costs to be paid by the defendant in error.

*Decree, modified.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. 

*License Number:*                     014460NF.                 

*Name:*                     Anthem Worldwide Lines, Inc.                 

*Address:*                     30 Montgomery Street, Suite 200, Jersey City, NJ 07302.                 

*Order Published:*                     FR: 06/11/08 (Volume 73, No. 113 Pg. 33092).                 

Sandra L. Kusumoto, 

Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

[FR Doc. E8-18766 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

l0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

138079 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138079 

 COA: 288359 

Muskegon CC: 07-055289-FC 

BENJAMIN JOHN JAGER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, 

FSB, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY 

BUT SOLELY AS OWNER TRUSTEE OF 

THE ASPEN G3 TRUST, A DELAWARE 

STATUTORY TRUST,

Respondent

v.

LANA L. BOGO, AND RONDA L. BOGO,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 31 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE>
<S>                                <C>                                  <C>
Exhibit 21.1

    Name of Subsidiary               Doing Business As (Name)         State of Incorporation

PHC, Inc.                            Pioneer Behavioral Health               Massachusetts
                                     PDS2                                    Massachusetts
                                     Pioneer Recovery Systems                Massachusetts

PHC of Utah, Inc.                    Highland Ridge Hospital                 Massachusetts
                                     Wellplace                               Massachusetts

PHC of Virginia, Inc.                Mount Regis Center                      Massachusetts
                                     Changes

PHC of Michigan, Inc.                Harbor Oaks Hospital                    Massachusetts
                                     Pioneer Healthcare of Michigan          Massachusetts
                                     Wellplace Call Center                   Massachusetts
                                     Detroit Behavioral Institute            Massachusetts

PHC of Nevada, Inc.                  Harmony Healthcare                      Massachusetts
Harmony Behavioral Healthcare                                                Nevada

Northpoint-Pioneer, Inc.             Pioneer Counseling Center               Massachusetts
                                     Pioneer Healthcare of Michigan          Massachusetts
                                     Pioneer Pharmaceutical Research         Massachusetts

PHC of Kansas, Inc.                  Total Concept, EAP                      Massachusetts

Pioneer Counseling of Virginia,
   Inc.                              Counseling Associates of Virginia       Massachusetts

BSC-NY, Inc.                         Behavioral Stress Center                New York

Professional Health Associates,
   Inc.                                                                      New York

Behavioral Health Online             BehavioralHealthOnLine.com              Massachusetts
                                     Wellplace

Detroit Behavioral Institute, Inc.                                           Massachusetts

Wellplace, Inc.                                                              Massachusetts

Pivotal Research Centers, Inc.          Pivotal Research Centers             Delaware
                                        Pivotal Research Centers, LLC


</TABLE>
#### Louis Hoffman, Respondent, v. William R. Jenkins Company, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, J.J., concurred.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

I.M., a child

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2198

[ October 12, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; James L. Martz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2015

- CJ

- 002932

- XXXX

- MB

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Publ ic Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Sr. Assistant A ttor ney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ERBER , C.J., M AY and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (No. 333-68801, No. 333-62767, No. 333-85556,
No. 333-07409, No. 333-13887 and No. 333-62767) and in the Registration
Statement on Forms S-3 (No. 333-63991, No. 333-11391, No. 333-23317 and
No. 333-63891) of Oryx Technology Corp. of our report dated May 25, 1999
relating to the financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-KSB.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
May 25, 1999
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Koppers Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Koppers Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Koppers and will be retained by Koppers and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |                          |  |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|                        |  | 
|/s/    WALTER W. TURNER |  |  |  | /s/    BRIAN H.
MCCURRIE
|Walter W. Turner        |  |  |  | Brian H. McCurrie       
|                        |  |  |  |                         
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|March 16, 2004          |  |  |  | March 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

I, Michael P. Scarpelli., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Data Domain, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Data Domain, Inc.



|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ MICHAEL P. SCARPELLI
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Michael P. Scarpelli                             
|                  |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-92033) of Anesta, Corp. of our report dated
February 18, 2000, except as to the information presented in Note 14, for which
for the date is March 13, 2000, relating to the financial statements, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated February 18, 2000, except as to the information presented in
Note 14, for which for the date is March 13, 2000, relating to the financial
statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
March 30, 2000