# Patent

## Title
Facilitation of delay error correction in timing-based location systems

## Abstract

Computation of delay error offset information is facilitated. A method can include receiving measurement information indicative of a location of a mobile device, calibrating the measurement information resulting in calibrated measurement information, comparing the calibrated measurement information and historical calibrated measurement information, and computing a measurement error based, at least, on the comparing, wherein the measurement error includes delay error offset information.

## Background
RELATED APPLICATION
This patent application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/551,369 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,892,054), filed Jul. 17, 2012, and entitled “FACILITATION OF DELAY ERROR CORRECTION IN TIMING-BASED LOCATION SYSTEMS,” the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.


TECHNICAL FIELD
The subject disclosure relates to wireless communications and, more particularly, to various embodiments that facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
BACKGROUND
Locating systems are becoming widespread with the onslaught of location-based services. Applications that depend on such services are growing, and the need for accurate measurement information is ever present and compelling.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 illustrates an example system that facilitates delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
FIG. 2 illustrates an example system that can be employed to facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
FIG. 3 illustrates an example delay error mitigation grid that can be employed to facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
FIG. 4 illustrates an example data storage that facilitates delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
FIGS. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 illustrate example flowcharts of methods that facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of a computer operable to facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
One or more embodiments are now described with reference to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the various embodiments. It is evident, however, that the various embodiments can be practiced without these specific details (and without applying to any particular networked environment or standard).
Moreover, the following descriptions of the various embodiments are intended to neither identify key or critical elements of any of the embodiments nor delineate any scope particular to such embodiments, or any scope of the claims.
As used in this application, the terms “component,” “module,” “system,” “interface,” “platform,” “service,” “framework,” “connector,” “controller” or the like are generally intended to refer to a computer-related entity, either hardware, a combination of hardware and software, software or software in execution or an entity related to an operational machine with one or more specific functionalities. For example, a component can be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer. By way of illustration, both an application running on a controller and the controller can be a component. One or more components can reside within a process and/or thread of execution and a component can be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers. As another example, an interface can include input/output (I/O) components as well as associated processor, application, and/or application programming interface (API) components.
Further, the various embodiments can be implemented as a method, apparatus or article of manufacture using standard programming and/or engineering techniques to produce software, firmware, hardware or any combination thereof to control a computer to implement the disclosed subject matter. The term “article of manufacture” as used herein is intended to encompass a computer program accessible from any computer-readable device or computer-readable storage/communications media. For example, computer readable storage media can include, but are not limited to, magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disk, floppy disk, magnetic strips), optical disks (e.g., compact disk (CD), digital versatile disk (DVD)), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., card, stick, key drive). Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize many modifications can be made to this configuration without departing from the scope or spirit of the various embodiments.
In addition, the words “example” and “exemplary” are used herein to mean serving as an instance or illustration. Any embodiment or design described herein as “example” or “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, use of the word example or exemplary is intended to present concepts in a concrete fashion. As used in this application, the term “or” is intended to mean an inclusive “or” rather than an exclusive “or”. That is, unless specified otherwise or clear from context, “X employs A or B” is intended to mean any of the natural inclusive permutations. That is, if X employs A; X employs B; or X employs both A and B, then “X employs A or B” is satisfied under any of the foregoing instances. In addition, the articles “a” and “an” as used in this application and the appended claims should generally be construed to mean “one or more” unless specified otherwise or clear from context to be directed to a singular form.
Moreover, terms such as “user equipment,” “mobile station,” “mobile,” subscriber station,” “access terminal,” “terminal,” “handset,” “mobile device” (and/or terms representing similar terminology) can refer to a wireless device utilized by a subscriber or user of a wireless communication service to receive or convey data, control, voice, video, sound, gaming or substantially any data-stream or signaling-stream. The foregoing terms are utilized interchangeably herein and with reference to the related drawings. Likewise, the terms “access point (AP),” “base station (BS),” “Node B,” “evolved Node B (eNode B),” “home Node B (HNB)” and the like, are utilized interchangeably in the application, and refer to a wireless network component or appliance that transmits and/or receives data, control, voice, video, sound, gaming or substantially any data-stream or signaling-stream from one or more subscriber stations. Data and signaling streams can be packetized or frame-based flows.
Furthermore, the terms “user,” “subscriber,” “customer,” “consumer” and the like are employed interchangeably throughout, unless context warrants particular distinctions among the terms. It should be appreciated that such terms can refer to human entities or automated components supported through artificial intelligence (e.g., a capacity to make inference based, at least, on complex mathematical formalisms), which can provide simulated vision, sound recognition and so forth.
Embodiments described herein can be exploited in substantially any wireless communication technology, including, but not limited to, Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi), Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), Enhanced General Packet Radio Service (Enhanced GPRS), Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Long Term Evolution (LTE), Third Generation Partnership Project 2 (3GPP2) Ultra Mobile Broadband (UMB), High Speed Packet Access (HSPA), Zigbee and other 802.XX wireless technologies and/or legacy telecommunication technologies. Further, the term “femto” and “femtocell” are used interchangeably, and the terms “macro” and “macrocell” are used interchangeably.
Conventional propagation modeling software, which adjusts signals across a signal propagation area, employs static models to represent clutter and terrain data. Accordingly, conventional approaches fail to accurately model dynamic environments resultant from seasonal changes in foliage, unlicensed repeaters and new building and home construction. In real-time location systems, a level of inaccuracy in a system is typically balanced against computational speed and cost as greater accuracy generally results in higher cost and slower speed.
Employing radio resource control (RRC) measurement reporting, and the corresponding procedure, measurement results can be transferred from the mobile device to a UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network (UTRAN). The RRC measurement reports can be sent periodically or upon occurrence of an event trigger. Periodic measurements can be setup in the radio network controller (RNC) by the operator in some embodiments.
Timing-based location methods utilize reported measurements from the RRC Measurement Report. These measurements include each individual Primary Scrambling Code (PSC) and an associated measured time difference to cell (TM) measurement.
The PSC represents a single radio carrier, or broadcasting cell. For each PSC, a TM measurement is reported. Pairs of TM measurements, between two distinct cells, can be calculated to represent the observed time difference (OTD) between the two cells.
Employing a Radio Access Network Application Part (RANAP) location report, and corresponding procedure, the mobile device location information can be transmitted to the core network (CN). The procedure can employ connection-oriented signaling. In some embodiments, the RANAP location report can be limited to location information based on an Assisted Global Positioning System (AGPS).
The system frame number (SFN)-connection frame number (CFN) OTD is a measurement for handoff timing to identify an active cell and neighbor cell time difference.
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth certain illustrative embodiments of the embodiments. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the embodiments can be employed. Other features of the embodiments will become apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
In one embodiment, a method for delay error correction in timing-based location systems can include: receiving, by a system including a processor, measurement information indicative of a location of a mobile device; calibrating, by the system, the measurement information resulting in calibrated measurement information; comparing, by the system, the calibrated measurement information and historical calibrated measurement information; and computing, by the system, a measurement error based, at least, on the comparing, wherein the measurement error includes delay error offset information. In some embodiments, the method can also include applying the delay error offset information to subsequently received measurement information indicative of a location of a mobile device.
In one embodiment, a system can include: a memory storing computer-executable instructions; and a processor, communicatively coupled to the memory, that facilitates execution of the computer-executable instructions to at least: receive measurement information indicative of a location impacted by a physical obstruction; determine a reference frame of a bin, wherein the bin corresponds to the location; and distribute delay error offset information to a plurality of frames of the bin within a predetermined distance from the reference frame.
In one embodiment, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium can store computer-executable instructions that, in response to execution, cause a system including a processor to perform operations. The operations can include: determining measurement information indicative of a location associated with a cell site pair; and adjusting the measurement information based, at least, on delay error offset information generated for the measurement information, wherein the delay error offset information is a function of calibration error calculated for the measurement information.
The following description and the annexed drawings set forth certain illustrative embodiments of the embodiments. These embodiments are indicative, however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principles of the embodiments can be employed. Other features of the embodiments can become apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments when considered in conjunction with the drawings.
In various embodiments described herein, systems and/or methods can determine geographic locations from mobile devices through the use of AGPS location technology. The geographic location can be employed to calibrate BS timing of the UMTS network. As a result, timed fingerprinting of the geographical location of mobile devices can be performed.
In various embodiments, the systems and/or methods described herein can perform the timed fingerprinting of the mobile devices employing binning, calibration, and locating processes.
For example, in some embodiments, the binning process can pre-compute time delay differentials and sensitivities between cell site pairs and fixed geographic bins. As such, binning can be a non-real-time process in some embodiments.
The geographic bins can represent geographic locations in various embodiments. Coordinate references can be used with fixed latitude and longitude offset multipliers allowing integer-based x and y coordinates for simplified indexing and lookup.
Approximately 100 meters of width and height for each bin can be employed in some embodiments. For example, in various embodiments, an approximate 100 m2 size bin can be used with a fixed longitude offset of approximately 0.0012 and a fixed latitude offset of approximately 0.0009. In some embodiments, coordinate references can be employed to represent various different geographic landmasses. For example, in the case of the United States, there can be four landmasses to consider (e.g., Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Continental United States). The reference point used can represent the southwestern most point to the landmass, which can be the minimum latitude and minimum longitude for the landmass.
In other embodiments, bins of other sizes can be employed to account for differences in geography in various places throughout the United States or world.
Turning now to the calibration, location and multi-lateration processes, the calibration process can be a semi real-time process that can include, but is not limited to, real-time call tracking, AGPS determinations, timing synchronization, PSC translation, calibration of the OTD between cell site pairs, derived calibration and/or calibration requests.
The locating process can be a real-time process that can include, but is not limited to, initial locating calculations, calculation of sensitivity, sensitivity rankings and filters, calculation of least error and final locating results.
The multi-lateration process can be a method of computing location of the mobile device from the time difference of arrival (TDOA) of a signal from multiple (e.g., three or more) transmitters to a single receiver. With respect to W-CDMA, for example, the multiple transmitters can be BSs, while the single receiver can be the mobile device. In some embodiments, calibration is employed in addition to multi-lateration to synchronize cell site measurements.
In various embodiments, an AGPS locate request can be triggered by any number of different types of platforms including, but not limited to, a Location-Based Services (LBS) platform. When a control plane-based request is made, the Gateway Mobile Location Center (GMLC) can send the request to the RNC at which the mobile device is currently active. The mobile device can report periodic and event-based RRC measurement reports containing timing-based information. Further, the mobile device can provide to the CN, through the RANAP location report, the information requested via the AGPS locate request. Information in the RRC measurement report and the RANAP location report can then be synchronized in time to perform error estimation.
FIG. 1 illustrates an example system that facilitates delay error correction in timing-based location systems. The system 100 can include a timing-based location system 102 and a delay error correction (DEC) component 104. In some embodiments, the system 100 can also include one or more mobile devices 106, 108, one or more base stations 110, 112 and a core network 114.
The timing-based location (TBL) system 102 can compute timing-based fingerprint information corresponding to the location for the one or more mobile devices 106, 108.
The DEC component 104 can compute delay error information for facilitating delay error correction in the TBL system 102. In some embodiments, the DEC component 104 can compute adjustments to the timing-based fingerprint information computed for the one or more mobile devices 106, 108 by the TBL system 102. The adjustments can be delay error offset values in some embodiments.
In various embodiments, the structure and/or functionality of the DEC component 104 can be as described with reference to FIGS. 2-7 (or vice versa). Turning first to FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, FIG. 2 illustrates an example system that can be employed to facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems. FIG. 3 illustrates an example delay error mitigation grid that can be employed to facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems. FIG. 4 illustrates an example data storage that facilitates delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
As shown in FIG. 2, the DEC 200 can include a communication component 202, a delay error offset component 204, bin component 206, memory 208 and/or processor 210. In various embodiments, one or more of the communication component 202, delay error offset component 204, bin component 206, memory 208 and/or processor 210 can be electrically and/or communicatively coupled to one another to perform one or more functions of the DEC 200.
The communication component 202 can transmit and/or receive information to and/or from one or more mobile devices, and/or one or more other cells sites. In some embodiments, the communication component 202 can obtain or determine measurement information associated with a mobile device. For example, the measurement information can include AGPS associated with the geographical location of the mobile device. In some embodiments, the measurement information can include
The AGPS information can include latitude and longitude information and/or any other type of information for identifying a geographical location of the mobile device and/or one or more cell sites.
The delay error offset component 204 can provide a real-time, self-updating process to calculate adjustments to the distance between a mobile, and a BS (e.g., Di) and to calculate adjustments to the distance between a mobilej and the BS (e.g., Dj). The adjustments can be delay error offsets in various embodiments.
The adjustments can be employed to correct the measurement information for the location of the mobile device as the measurement information may not account for propagation delay due to signal repeaters, physical structures, seasonal change in foliage and the like. The adjustments can be delay error offsets in various embodiments.
In some embodiments, after the communication component 202 receives the location measurement from the mobile device, the delay error offset component 204 can perform a calibration employing the measurement information.
The delay error offset component 204 can then compare the calibrated result against a previously-stored calibrated result from a past measurement. The delay error offset component 204 can then compute the difference between the current calibrated result and the previously-stored calibrated result can be an error value, Mij such as that shown in Equation 1 below.

Mij=OjiRc−OjiRh  (Equation 1)

where ij represents physical location pairs of cell sites, OjiRc is the newly-measured calibration measurement and OjiRh is the previously-stored, historical calibration measurement.

With each new calibration measurement, the delay error offset component 204 can calculate a new calibration measurement error. In some embodiments, the measurement error can be the root mean square (RMS) error. Accordingly, the measurement error can be updated over time to reflect changes in measurement information (which can result from seasonal changes in foliage, the construction of new physical structures and the like).
The delay error offset component 204 can assign the error value, Mij, as being equal to the delay error offset in some embodiments. The offset can be stored in association with the bin that represents the geographical location of the mobile device. Accordingly, offsets can be computed for each bin for each BS site pair.
In these embodiments, the delay error offsets can be applied to future measurements to determine a more accurate distance between the mobile device and the BS.
In various embodiments, collection of measurement information, calibration, computation of measurement error and/or assignment of measurement error to delay error offset can be performed over time, and the results aggregated over time for one or more different mobile devices. As such, the systems and methods described herein can facilitate an accumulation of errors at particular AGPS locations.
Further, in various embodiments, offsets calculated for overlapping locations can be aggregated to improve error estimates and reduce the impact of quantization and mobile device measurement error.
The bin component 206 will be described with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3. The bin component 206 can construct tables and/or information indicative of a bin, such as bin 300 shown in FIG. 3. The bin 300 can represent a physical location covering a region associated with or between two cell sites. In some embodiments, the bin 300 can represent a physical location covering a region associated with the geographical location of a mobile device.
As described above, the bin component 206 can construct the bin with fixed latitude and longitude offset multipliers allowing integer-based x and y coordinates for simplified indexing and lookup. In some embodiments, the bin can be 100 meters (m) of wide and 100 m high (although other dimensions for bins are possible and envisioned). In various embodiments, an approximate 100 m2 size bin can be constructed with a fixed longitude offset of approximately 0.0012 and a fixed latitude offset of approximately 0.0009. The frames of the bin 300 can be 1/10th the size of the bin 300.
The bin component 206 can receive one or more delay error offsets computed by the delay error offset component 204 for a bin 300. In these embodiments, the bin component 206 can store delay error offset information in the frames of the bin 300.
The bin component 206 can perform extrapolation to assign values in the various frames in some embodiments. In various embodiments, the values are percentages that can represent weights to be applied at geographical locations corresponding to the frame of the bin 300. The values can decrease with increasing distance from the center of the bin 300 in some embodiments.
For example, when the system receives a measurement and an associated AGPS reading, the AGPS reading represents a small area (e.g., 10 m2), as shown in FIG. 3. Because the error in measurement at the frame corresponding to the small area can be larger than the confined area of the frame, the value associated with the frame can be distributed to frames that are adjacent to the frame corresponding to the small area. As shown in FIG. 3, the center frame can be associated with a full weight of the error and the further from the center frame a frame is located, the less weight of the error. As such, the values (as shown in FIG. 3) decrease as the distance from the center frame increases. Each measurement received can be processed according to such approach and the values employed for the weights can aggregate with a plurality of measurements.
FIG. 3 shows one example of percentages for corresponding frames. In particular, the bin component 300 employs extrapolation to assign the frames percentage values three levels from the center location of the bin 300. The center location reflects the latitude and longitude location of the actual measurement from the mobile device in some embodiments.
The values can be percentages ranging from 0 percent to 100 percent. Each measurement can be applied to the four adjacent frames, and three levels out with a measurement weighting. 100% weighting will be applied to measurements made at the center frames. 75% weighting will be applied to measurements made at the first level adjacent frames. 50% weighting will be applied at the second level frames, and 25% at the third level frames. For each frame, the bin component 206 can provide to the data storage 204 the delay error offset information, timestamp and percentage weighting information. Other values are possible in other embodiments and are envisaged.
When determining the delay error offset to use during the mobile locating process, all of the measurements with corresponding weights can be used in aggregate to output a single delay error constant.
For example, the weights can be as shown in FIG. 3. By way of example, the center frame of FIG. 3 can be assigned the location corresponding to an AGPS measurement from the mobile device. The error calculation can be used at full weight (100%) for the 4 center frames. The error can have less weight, at the next layer (75%) and at subsequent layers (e.g., the next layer (50%), and the next layer (25%)). Accordingly, an error can be assigned from the calculation to the frames having values corresponding to 25%. However, such frames contribute only 25% of the weighting when used in aggregate with other measurements/AGPS locates.
In some embodiments, Equation 1 can be the error formula for each occurrence (i.e., for each measurement and AGPS location). The measurement can be then weighted by the above-mentioned values and applied across frames that are adjacent to those of the center frame (which represents the location of the measurement). The multiple measurements that are weighed can then be aggregated on a per frame basis to determine an aggregate the measurement and apply across adjacent bins, as shown in FIG. 3, then we aggregate multiple measurements on a per bin basis to come up with an aggregate Mu for each 10 m2 frame.
During the locating process, if an Mij value exists for a given frame under evaluation, the error offset can be applied to improve location estimation in some embodiments. If an Mij doesn't exist for a frame, then no Mij is used.
In various embodiments, the Mij value can be used in different types of locating algorithms (e.g., multi-lateration, hyperbolic, and timed fingerprint locating algorithms), and can prove equally effective across each to improve the result.
Over time, the accuracy of the measurements may weaken in value due to changes in actual clutter (e.g., trees, buildings, other obstructions). When a minimum of two new measurements result in a significant difference from prior measurements, prior measurements can be discarded for the bin representing such geographical area from which measurements were received, and all measurements which were extrapolated at three levels out from the bin, and can be fully replaced by the new measurements.
Further, in various embodiments, a rolling history of the delay error offset information and weights over time can be stored. Feedback statistics can be employed to determine the optimal time period over which to store delay error offset information and weights.
The memory 208 can be a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions and/or information for performing the functions described herein with reference to the DEC 200. For example, the memory 208 can store information including, but not limited to, delay error offset information, newly-measured and historical calibration information, AGPS information, bin weights, timestamp information or the like. Processor 210 can perform one or more of the functions described herein with reference to the DEC 200.
Turning now to FIG. 4, in various embodiments, the data storage 204, 204′ can include various different type of information for determining delay error offset information. By way of example, but not limitation, the data storage 204, 204′ can include delay error offset information 402, cell site pair information 404, historical calibration information 406 and/or bin information 408.
In various embodiments, the delay error offset information 402 can include delay error offsets computed over time for particular bins for cell site pairs, the cell site pair information 404 can include information identifying the cell site pairs, the historical calibration information 406 can include stored calibration information computed from previous measurements calibrated, and/or the bin information can include information indicative of the values shown in FIG. 3 and/or information identifying the configuration of values within a particular bin.
FIGS. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 illustrate example flowcharts of methods that facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems.
Turning first to FIG. 5, at 502, method 500 can include receiving, by a system including a processor, measurement information indicative of a location of a mobile device. At 504, method 500 can include calibrating, by the system, the measurement information resulting in calibrated measurement information. At 506, method 500 can include comparing, by the system, the calibrated measurement information and historical calibrated measurement information. At 508, method 500 can include computing, by the system, a measurement error based, at least, on the comparing, wherein the measurement error includes delay error offset information. Although not shown, in various embodiments, the delay error offset information can be applied to subsequently received measurement information indicative of a location of a mobile device. The applied delay error offset information can be employed in improving the locating ability of the systems described herein.
Turning now to FIG. 6, at 602, method 600 can include receiving, by a system including a processor, measurement information indicative of a location impacted by a physical obstruction. At 604, method 600 can include determining, by the system, a reference frame of a bin corresponding to the location. At 606, method 600 can include distributing, by the system, delay error offset information to a plurality of frames of the bin within a predetermined distance from the reference frame.
Turning now to FIG. 7, at 702, method 700 can include determining measurement information indicative of a location associated with a cell site pair. At 704, method 700 can include adjusting the measurement information based, at least, on delay error offset information generated for the measurement information, wherein the delay error offset information is a function of calibration error calculated for the measurement information.
Turning now to FIG. 8, at 802, method 800 can include generating calibrated measurement information for a cell site pair. At 804, method 800 can include computing a calibration error for the measurement information for the cell site pair based, at least, on a difference between the newly-generated calibration measurement information and historical calibrated measurement information collected over time.
Turning now to FIG. 9, at 902, method 900 can include generating delay error offset information based, at least, on measurement information received for one or more mobile devices over a predefined time. At 904, method 900 can include aggregating delay error offset information associated with measurement information collected for a plurality of overlapping geographical regions.
Referring now to FIG. 10, there is illustrated a block diagram of a computer operable to facilitate delay error correction in timing-based location systems. In order to provide additional context for various embodiments of the embodiments described herein, FIG. 10 and the following discussion are intended to provide a brief, general description of a suitable computing environment 1000 in which the various embodiments of the embodiment described herein can be implemented. While the embodiments have been described above in the general context of computer-executable instructions that can run on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments can be also implemented in combination with other program modules and/or as a combination of hardware and software.
Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the inventive methods can be practiced with other computer system configurations, including single-processor or multiprocessor computer systems, minicomputers, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers, hand-held computing devices, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, and the like, each of which can be operatively coupled to one or more associated devices.
The illustrated embodiments of the embodiments herein can be also practiced in distributed computing environments where certain tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules can be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Computing devices typically include a variety of media, which can include computer-readable storage media and/or communications media, which two terms are used herein differently from one another as follows. Computer-readable storage media can be any available storage media that can be accessed by the computer and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable storage media can be implemented in connection with any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, program modules, structured data or unstructured data. Computer-readable storage media can include, but are not limited to, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices or other tangible and/or non-transitory media which can be used to store desired information. Computer-readable storage media can be accessed by one or more local or remote computing devices, e.g., via access requests, queries or other data retrieval protocols, for a variety of operations with respect to the information stored by the medium.
Communications media typically embody computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other structured or unstructured data in a data signal such as a modulated data signal, e.g., a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery or transport media. The term “modulated data signal” or signals refers to a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in one or more signals. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media include wired media, such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media.
With reference again to FIG. 10, the example environment 1000 for implementing various embodiments of the embodiments includes a computer 1002, the computer 1002 including a processing unit 1004, a system memory 1006 and a system bus 1008. The system bus 1008 couples system components including, but not limited to, the system memory 1006 to the processing unit 1004. The processing unit 1004 can be any of various commercially available processors. Dual microprocessors and other multi-processor architectures can also be employed as the processing unit 1004.
The system bus 1008 can be any of several types of bus structure that can further interconnect to a memory bus (with or without a memory controller), a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures. The system memory 1006 includes ROM 1010 and RAM 1012. A basic input/output system (BIOS) can be stored in a non-volatile memory 1010 such as ROM, erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM), EEPROM, which BIOS contains the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer 1002, such as during startup. The RAM 1012 can also include a high-speed RAM such as static RAM for caching data.
The computer 1002 further includes an internal hard disk drive (HDD) 1014 (e.g., EIDE, SATA), which internal hard disk drive 1014 can also be configured for external use in a suitable chassis (not shown), a magnetic floppy disk drive (FDD) 1016, (e.g., to read from or write to a removable diskette 1018) and an optical disk drive 1020, (e.g., reading a CD-ROM disk 1022 or, to read from or write to other high capacity optical media such as the DVD). The hard disk drive 1014, magnetic disk drive 1016 and optical disk drive 1020 can be connected to the system bus 1008 by a hard disk drive interface 1024, a magnetic disk drive interface 1026 and an optical drive interface 1028, respectively. The interface 1024 for external drive implementations includes at least one or both of Universal Serial Bus (USB) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1094 interface technologies. Other external drive connection technologies are within contemplation of the embodiments described herein.
The drives and their associated computer-readable storage media provide nonvolatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and so forth. For the computer 1002, the drives and storage media accommodate the storage of any data in a suitable digital format. Although the description of computer-readable storage media above refers to a hard disk drive (HDD), a removable magnetic diskette, and a removable optical media such as a CD or DVD, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of storage media which are readable by a computer, such as zip drives, magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, cartridges, and the like, can also be used in the example operating environment, and further, that any such storage media can contain computer-executable instructions for performing the methods described herein.
A number of program modules can be stored in the drives and RAM 1012, including an operating system 1030, one or more application programs 1032, other program modules 1034 and program data 1036. All or portions of the operating system, applications, modules, and/or data can also be cached in the RAM 1012. The systems and methods described herein can be implemented utilizing various commercially available operating systems or combinations of operating systems.
A user can enter commands and information into the computer 1002 through one or more wired/wireless input devices, e.g., a keyboard 1038 and a pointing device, such as a mouse 1040. Other input devices (not shown) can include a microphone, an infrared (IR) remote control, a joystick, a game pad, a stylus pen, touch screen or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 1004 through an input device interface 1042 that can be coupled to the system bus 1008, but can be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, an IEEE 1394 serial port, a game port, a universal serial bus (USB) port, an IR interface, etc.
A monitor 1044 or other type of display device can be also connected to the system bus 1008 via an interface, such as a video adapter 1046. In addition to the monitor 1044, a computer typically includes other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers, printers, etc.
The computer 1002 can operate in a networked environment using logical connections via wired and/or wireless communications to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer(s) 1048. The remote computer(s) 1048 can be a workstation, a server computer, a router, a personal computer, portable computer, microprocessor-based entertainment appliance, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 1002, although, for purposes of brevity, only a memory/storage device 1050 is illustrated. The logical connections depicted include wired/wireless connectivity to a local area network (LAN) 1052 and/or larger networks, e.g., a wide area network (WAN) 1054. Such LAN and WAN networking environments are commonplace in offices and companies, and facilitate enterprise-wide computer networks, such as intranets, all of which can connect to a global communications network, e.g., the Internet.
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 1002 can be connected to the local network 1052 through a wired and/or wireless communication network interface or adapter 1056. The adapter 1056 can facilitate wired or wireless communication to the LAN 1052, which can also include a wireless AP disposed thereon for communicating with the wireless adapter 1056.
When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 1002 can include a modem 1058 or can be connected to a communications server on the WAN 1054 or has other means for establishing communications over the WAN 1054, such as by way of the Internet. The modem 1058, which can be internal or external and a wired or wireless device, can be connected to the system bus 1008 via the serial port interface 1042. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 1002 or portions thereof, can be stored in the remote memory/storage device 1050. It can be appreciated that the network connections shown are example and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers can be used.
The computer 1002 can be operable to communicate with any wireless devices or entities operatively disposed in wireless communication, e.g., a printer, scanner, desktop and/or portable computer, portable data assistant, communications satellite, any piece of equipment or location associated with a wirelessly detectable tag (e.g., a kiosk, news stand, restroom), and telephone. This includes at least Wi-Fi and BLUETOOTH® wireless technologies. Thus, the communication can be a predefined structure as with a conventional network or simply an ad hoc communication between at least two devices.
Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi) can allow connection to the Internet from a couch at home, a bed in a hotel room or a conference room at work, without wires. Wi-Fi is a wireless technology similar to that used in a cell phone that enables such devices, e.g., computers, to send and receive data indoors and out; anywhere within the range of a base station. Wi-Fi networks use radio technologies called IEEE 802.11(a, b, g, n, etc.) to provide secure, reliable, fast wireless connectivity. A Wi-Fi network can be used to connect computers to each other, to the Internet, and to wired networks (which can use IEEE 802.3 or Ethernet). Wi-Fi networks operate in the unlicensed 2.4 and 5 GHz radio bands, at an 13 Mbps (802.13a) or 54 Mbps (802.13b) data rate, for example or with products that contain both bands (dual band), so the networks can provide real-world performance similar to the basic 10BaseT wired Ethernet networks used in many offices.
The embodiments described herein can employ artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate automating one or more features described herein. The embodiments (e.g., in connection with automatically identifying acquired cell sites that provide a maximum value/benefit after addition to an existing communication network) can employ various AI-based schemes for carrying out various embodiments thereof. Moreover, the classifier can be employed to determine a ranking or priority of the each cell site of the acquired network. A classifier is a function that maps an input attribute vector, x=(x1, x2, x3, x4, . . . , xn), to a confidence that the input belongs to a class, that is, f(x)=confidence(class). Such classification can employ a probabilistic and/or statistical-based analysis (e.g., factoring into the analysis utilities and costs) to prognose or infer an action that a user desires to be automatically performed. A support vector machine (SVM) is an example of a classifier that can be employed. The SVM operates by finding a hypersurface in the space of possible inputs, which the hypersurface attempts to split the triggering criteria from the non-triggering events. Intuitively, this makes the classification correct for testing data that is near, but not identical to training data. Other directed and undirected model classification approaches include, e.g., naïve Bayes, Bayesian networks, decision trees, neural networks, fuzzy logic models, and probabilistic classification models providing different patterns of independence can be employed. Classification as used herein also is inclusive of statistical regression that is utilized to develop models of priority.
As can be readily appreciated, one or more of the embodiments can employ classifiers that are explicitly trained (e.g., via a generic training data) as well as implicitly trained (e.g., via observing mobile device behavior, operator preferences, historical information, receiving extrinsic information). For example, SVMs can be configured via a learning or training phase within a classifier constructor and feature selection module. Thus, the classifier(s) can be used to automatically learn and perform a number of functions, including but not limited to determining according to a predetermined criteria which of the acquired cell sites can benefit a maximum number of subscribers and/or which of the acquired cell sites will add minimum value to the existing communication network coverage, etc.
As employed herein, the term “processor” can refer to substantially any computing processing unit or device comprising, but not limited to comprising, single-core processors; single-processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors; multi-core processors with software multithread execution capability; multi-core processors with hardware multithread technology; parallel platforms; and parallel platforms with distributed shared memory. Additionally, a processor can refer to an integrated circuit, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a digital signal processor (DSP), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a programmable logic controller (PLC), a complex programmable logic device (CPLD), a discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. Processors can exploit nano-scale architectures such as, but not limited to, molecular and quantum-dot based transistors, switches and gates, in order to optimize space usage or enhance performance of user equipment. A processor can also be implemented as a combination of computing processing units.
As used herein, terms such as “data storage,” data storage,” “database,” and substantially any other information storage component relevant to operation and functionality of a component, refer to “memory components,” or entities embodied in a “memory” or components comprising the memory. It can be appreciated that the memory components or computer-readable storage media, described herein can be either volatile memory or nonvolatile memory or can include both volatile and nonvolatile memory.
Memory disclosed herein can include volatile memory or nonvolatile memory or can include both volatile and nonvolatile memory. By way of illustration, and not limitation, nonvolatile memory can include read only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable PROM (EEPROM) or flash memory. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM), which acts as external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in many forms such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDR SDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), Synchlink DRAM (SLDRAM), and direct Rambus RAM (DRRAM). The memory (e.g., data storages, databases) of the embodiments are intended to comprise, without being limited to, these and any other suitable types of memory.
What has been described above includes mere examples of various embodiments. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or methodologies for purposes of describing these examples, but one of ordinary skill in the art can recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the present embodiments are possible. Accordingly, the embodiments disclosed and/or claimed herein are intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Furthermore, to the extent that the term “includes” is used in either the detailed description or the claims, such term is intended to be inclusive in a manner similar to the term “comprising” as “comprising” is interpreted when employed as a transitional word in a claim.

## Claims

1. A method, comprising:
comparing, by a system comprising a processor, calibrated measurement information and historical calibrated measurement information, wherein the calibrated measurement information and the historical calibrated measurement information are associated with measurement information indicative of a location of a mobile device; and
determining, by the system, a measurement error based on a result of the comparing, wherein the measurement error comprises delay error offset information.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the measurement information comprises assisted global positioning system measurement information.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising storing, by the system, the delay error offset information in association with a bin, wherein the bin is representative of the location of the mobile device.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
determining, by the system, weights to be applied to frames of the bin, wherein the weights change in value based on a change in value of a distance from a defined center of the bin.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the weights range from about zero to about one.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
applying, by the system, the delay error offset information to subsequently received measurement information indicative of a subsequent location of the mobile device.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
aggregating, by the system, the measurement information for the location received by the system over a period of time.

8. A method, comprising:
determining, by a device comprising a processor, a reference frame of a bin, wherein the bin corresponds to a position associated with measurement information indicative of a location impacted by a physical obstruction; and
distributing delay error offset information to frames of the bin within a defined distance from the reference frame, wherein the delay error offset information comprises a weighting of the frames within the defined distance by respective values.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the respective values are between about 0% and about 100%.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein the respective values change in value as a distance from the reference frame to the location to the frames changes.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein the measurement information comprises assisted global positioning system information.

12. A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory that stores executable instructions that, when executed by the processor, facilitate performance of operations, comprising:
determining measurement information indicative of a location associated with a pair of cell site devices; and
adjusting the measurement information as a function of delay error offset information generated for the measurement information, wherein the delay error offset information is a function of calibration error determined for the measurement information.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein the operations further comprise:
generating calibrated measurement information by calibrating the measurement information; and
determining the calibration error based on a difference between the calibrated measurement information and historical calibrated measurement information.

14. The system of claim 12, wherein the operations further comprise:
associating the delay error offset information with the location associated with the pair of cell site devices.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein the operations further comprise:
locating a mobile device communicatively coupled to the pair of cell site devices, wherein the locating is based on the measurement information and the delay error offset information.

16. The system of claim 15, wherein the locating is further based on weights applied to the measurement information, and wherein the weights are representative of physical structures in a geographical region covered by the location.

17. The system of claim 16, wherein the weights have values between about zero percent and about 100 percent.

18. The system of claim 12, wherein the operations further comprise:
aggregating the measurement information for the location over a defined period of time.

19. The system of claim 12, wherein the operations further comprise:
aggregating the delay error offset information for the location over a defined period of time.

20. The system of claim 12, wherein the measurement information comprises assisted global positioning system measurement information.