alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ANIBAR PALACIOS-HERNANDEZ

 a/k/a MANUEL GOMEZ-LOPEZ,

Defendant.

 /

Case Nos. 09-CR-20083-1

 09-CR-20266-1

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District 

of Michigan, on_September 17, 2009.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On August 10, 2009, Defendant was sentenced to 33 months on Case No. 09-CR20083-1, and on Case No. 09-CR-20266-1 he was sentenced to 4 months to run

consecutive to the sentence on imposed on 09-CR-20083.

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s “Motion for Concurrent Sentencing or

Downward Departure,” which was filed on September 15, 2009. The essence of

Defendant’s motion is a request that the Court “reduce” his sentence. Defendant’s

motion must be denied.

2:09-cr-20266-PJD Doc # 9 Filed 09/17/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 36
2

Defendant assumes that this Court has “discretion” to reduce his sentence. The

Court does not have such discretion. Once a court imposes a sentence of

incarceration, the Court may not later change that sentence except in limited

circumstances, none of which apply in this case.

However, even if the Court had discretion, the Court would not reduce the

sentence that it imposed.

For the reasons sets forth above, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is DENIED. 

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies to:

Anibar-Palacios-Hernandez

 a/k/a Manuel Gomez-Lopez, #34161-177

FCI Milan

P.O. Box 1000

Milan, MI 48160

2:09-cr-20266-PJD Doc # 9 Filed 09/17/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 37
EXHIBIT 10.96

MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.

FISCAL 2010

EXECUTIVE OFFICER

BONUS TARGETS

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The executive officers of the Company serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors. From time to time, the Human Resources and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews and determines the salaries that are paid to the Companys executive officers. The following table sets forth the target bonus for the Companys executive officers.



|                    |  |                                 |  
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | -
|Name                |  | Target Bonus(as % ofbasesalary) |  
|Joseph C. Lawler    |  | 140                             | %
|Steven G. Crane     |  | 85                              | %
|Peter L. Gray       |  | 75                              | %
|William R. McLennan |  | 95                              | %
|David J. Riley      |  | 65                              | %
#### BENEFICIAL PERSONNEL SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC. and Business Staffing, Inc. v. Noel PORRAS.

No. 96-0854.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1997.

Appeal from 143rd District Court, Ward County; Bob Parks, Judge.

Prior report: Tex.App., 927 S.W.2d 177.

The joint application for writ of error is granted without reference to the merits and the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated without reference to the merits. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals in accordance with the settlement agreement of *717the parties. The joint motion to remand is dismissed as moot.
#### NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

No. 8314.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 16, 1938.

Stanley Pedder, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

James W. Morris, Asst. U. S Atty. Gen., for respondent.

*1014Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.
Exhibit








Exhibit (10.33)
Amendment to 
Standard & Poor’s Employee Retirement Plan Supplement


The Standard and Poor’s Employee Retirement Plan Supplement (the “S&P Supplemental Plan”), amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008, unless otherwise provided, is amended as provided below. 


		
	1.
	Effective January 1, 2020, Section 8.02 of the S&P Supplemental Plan is amended by adding the following to the end thereof:


For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, to the extent permitted by 409A of the Code, a distribution shall be made from the Plan to an individual other than the Participant to the extent necessary to comply with a domestic relations order (as defined in Code Section 414(p)(1)(B)) as determined by the Plan Administrator in his or her sole discretion.


*               *               *
Except as set forth herein, the S&P Supplemental Plan remains in full force and effect.
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 536

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To prohibit the use of Highway 209 within the Delaware

Water Gap National Recreation Area by certain commercial vehicles, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective at noon on September

5 30, 2005, the use of Highway 209 within Delaware Water

6 Gap National Recreation Area by commercial vehicles,

7 when such use is not connected with the operation of the

8 recreation area, is prohibited, except as provided in sub9 section (b).
2

HR 536 RFS

1 (b) LOCAL BUSINESS USE PROTECTED.—Subsection

2 (a) does not apply with respect to the use of commercial

3 vehicles to serve businesses located within or in the vicinity

4 of the recreation area, as determined by the Secretary.

5 (c) CONFORMING PROVISIONS.—(1) Paragraphs (1)

6 through (3) of the third undesignated paragraph under

7 the heading ‘‘ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS’’ in

8 chapter VII of title I of Public Law 98–63 (97 Stat. 329)

9 are repealed, effective September 30, 2005.

10 (2) Prior to noon on September 30, 2005, the Sec11 retary shall collect and utilize a commercial use fee from

12 commercial vehicles in accordance with paragraphs (1)

13 through (3) of such third undesignated paragraph. Such

14 fee shall not exceed $25 per trip.

Passed the House of Representatives March 14,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

Pursuant to U.S.C.Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Arcade Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the periods ended September 30, 2008 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 12, 2008 | /s/ Jonathan Furer      |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                           | Jonathan Furer          |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer |
|                           |                    |
|                           | /s/ John Chapman        |
|                           | John Chapman            |
|                           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 04 73 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PHILIP BRYSON GRIMSHAW,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until November 30, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 27 2022

10/27/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0473
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLM Minerals Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Xin Chen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 15th day of October, 2010.








XIN CHENXin ChenChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

               CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                          SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

            I, Gary R. Fairhead, am President and Chief Executive Officer of
SigmaTron International, Inc. (the "Company").

            This certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection
with the filing of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2003 (the "Report").

            I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

            (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
            or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 m(a)
            or 78o(d); and

            (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  July 21, 2003


                                        /s/ Gary R. Fairhead
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gary R. Fairhead
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer of
                                        SigmaTron International, Inc.


NOTE: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to SigmaTron International, Inc. and will be retained by SigmaTron
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by law,
be deemed filed by SigmaTron International, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday August 20, 2008.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Staff Assistant.

[FR Doc. E8-18335 Filed 8-5-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Oryx Technology Corp.
       Amendment to Micciche Employment Agreement dated February 28, 2002.


3.1 Base Salary.  For services  rendered under this Agreement from March 1, 2002
through the end of February  2004,  the Company shall pay Micciche a Base Salary
of $16,667 per month, in each case payable in accordance  with Company's  normal
payroll practices. All amounts payable to Micciche under this Agreement shall be
reduced by such amounts as are required to be withheld by applicable law.

Starting January 1, 2003,  Micciche agrees to permanently defer $6,667 per month
and the total amount deferred is payable only when Oryx Technology is profitable
for two consecutive  quarters.  The payable condition will terminate on December
30, 2007.  The deferral  period will end February 29, 2004 or sooner if directed
by the Board of Oryx.


/s/ Philip J Micciche
------------------------
Philip J. Micciche


12-23-02
---------
Date
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

137774 (20) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

DWIGHT ERVIN ANDREWS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 137774 

 COA: 286001 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $1.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$374.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 2, 2008 

Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

 CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

 JUSTICES

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER 

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

KEITH E. HOTTLE 

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335-2762

December 9, 2015

Zachary Gibson

Assistant Criminal District Attorney

Paul Elizondo Tower

101 W. Nueva Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Michael Stephen Raign

1633 Babcock Rd. #289

San Antonio, TX 78229

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-15-00500-CV and 04-15-00505-CV

Trial Court Case Number: 2015-MH-2596 and 2015-MH-2544

Style: In the Best Interest and Protection of S.W.

Dear Counsel:

The above cause has been set for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY before this 

Court on December 30, 2015, before a panel consisting of Justice Barnard, Justice Martinez, and 

Justice Chapa.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

_____________________________

Rosa Gonzalez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53855
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42922

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DELBERT WAYNE GILPIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 608

Filed: September 2, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of seven years, for lewd conduct with a minor child under 

sixteen and concurrent indeterminate term of ten years for sexual exploitation of a 

child, affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Erik R. Lehtinen, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Delbert Wayne Gilpin pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen, I.C. 

§ 18-1508, and sexual exploitation of a child, I.C. § 18-1507(2)(a). In exchange for his guilty 

plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Gilpin to a unified term of 

twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven years, for lewd conduct with a 

minor child under sixteen and a concurrent indeterminate term of ten years for sexual 

exploitation of a child. Gilpin appeals.
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Gilpin’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
MIE (Rev. 9/09) Order Re: Disqualification of Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

United States of America,

Plaintiff(s), Case No. 

v. Honorable

Defendant(s).

/

ORDER RE: DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, I hereby DISQUALIFY myself from the above-styled case.

IT IS ORDERED that in accordance with E.D. Mich. LCrR 57.10(c), this case be reassigned by blind draw

to another judge of this court.

Date:

U.S. District Judge

Pursuant to this order, this case is reassigned to Judge .

Case assignment credit will be given to the appropriate Judicial Officers.

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing Order was served upon the parties and/or counsel

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

Date:

Deputy Clerk

AUSTIN GOMAN (D-4, ONLY)

09-20297-04

John Corbett O'Meara

April 6, 2012

Gerald E. Rosen

April 9, 2012 s/ S Schoenherr

s/John Corbett O'Meara

John Corbett O'Meara

5:09-cr-20297-GER-VMM Doc # 55 Filed 04/09/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 335
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3, No. 333-13363,
Form S-3, No. 333-03205, Form S-8, No. 333-81863, and Form S-8, No. 333-81865) of The
Mills Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 20, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Mills Corporation included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2000.

/s/
ERNST & YOUNG LLP

McLean,
Virginia
August 10, 2001

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20207

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

SHANNON MARIE MEJIA,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On November 25, 2009, this case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

November 30, 2009. In open court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by

Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense(s) to which Defendant pleaded guilty is(are) supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have ordered the

preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:09-cr-20207-TLL-CEB Doc # 18 Filed 11/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 78
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and Recommendation

within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure

to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins. Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596

(6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The parties are

advised that making some objections, but failing to raise others, will not preserve all the objections

a party may have to this Report and Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security,

474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir. 2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich.

LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: November 30, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on Roy Kranz and David Koelzer, and served on District Judge Ludington

in the traditional manner.

Date: November 30, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

1:09-cr-20207-TLL-CEB Doc # 18 Filed 11/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 79
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ottis Jean McCOY, Appellant.

No. WD 48259.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 19, 1994.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from convictions of three counts of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo Supp.1991.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).