alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary A. Rosenberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing statement is furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and for no other reason.








/s/ Gary A. Rosenberg


Gary A. Rosenberg


Chief Executive Officer


February 23, 2011
* The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1554

___________ Lloyd R. Holmes, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * State of Georgia; Linda L. Thurn, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 2, 2004 Filed: September 10, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Lloyd R. Holmes appeals the district court’s * pre-service dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) of Holmes's complaint asserting violations of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, and the Fourteenth Amendment. After careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude dismissal was proper. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF SEL-DRUM  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.,  FOR THE TWELVE  MONTH
PERIOD  ENDED JULY 31,  1997,  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                   1,084,954
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                            2,272,129
<ALLOWANCES>                                72,504
<INVENTORY>                              3,143,472 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         6,572,829
<PP&E>                                   1,845,055
<DEPRECIATION>                             919,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,695,839
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    2,340,135
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                              4,800,180
<COMMON>                                   771,356
<OTHER-SE>                                (356,813)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             7,695,839
<SALES>                                 16,619,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        16,619,967
<CGS>                                   10,968,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           10,968,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         3,954,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            75,089
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         106,510   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,499,912
<INCOME-TAX>                               538,058
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               961,854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13
                                                      
                                          
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert B. Hirsch v. New England Navigation Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
*       *       *       *       *  EXHIBIT 31: Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications  I, Jianye Wang, certify that:  1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Standard Commerce, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this  report; 3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report; 4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have: a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and 5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  1    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting. Date: November 19, 2007 /s/ Jianye Wang Jianye Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   2
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc L. Baker, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Marc L. Baker





Marc L. Baker


Acting Chief Financial Officer


Dated: November 12, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-102593,333-104958, 333-107756 and 333-108889 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-35751,333-88635, 333-43834, 333-70952, 333-96963, 333-107008, 333-121533 and 333-127662 on Form S-8 ofour reports dated March 15, 2006, relating to the financial statements and the financial statementschedule of Dot Hill Systems Corp. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dot Hill Systems Corp. forthe year ended December 31, 2005./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPSan Diego, California
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 539 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 539

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax exemption 
                         for health risk pools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 1995

  Mr. Parker introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a tax exemption 
                         for health risk pools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) subsection (c) 
of section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to list 
of exempt organizations) is amended by adding at the end thereof the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(26) Any corporation, association, or similar legal 
        entity which is created by any State or political subdivision 
        thereof to establish a risk pool to provide health insurance 
        coverage to any person unable to obtain health insurance 
        coverage in the private insurance market because of health 
        conditions and no part of the net earnings of which inures to 
        the benefit of any private shareholder, member, or 
        individual.''
    (b) The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxable 
years beginning after December 31, 1989.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Agatha Auduon, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 14, 2007

                                        By: /s/ Agatha Auduon
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Agatha Auduon
                                            Treasurer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus CASTRO-GARCIA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-55233. D.C. Nos. CV-02-01664-JNK/LAB, CR-01-00548-LKK.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 28, 2003.

*689Before LEAVY, HAWKINS and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Federal prisoner Jesus Castro Garcia appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his 46-month sentence, which was imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826.

We agree with the district court that Castro-Garcia did not establish that his counsel was ineffective at sentencing for failing to object under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*580 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), to the district court’s use of prior state convictions to enhance Castro-Garcia’s sentence for a prior aggravated felony, because this issue is foreclosed by *United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda,*234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000). We also agree with the district court that Castro-Garcia failed to establish that his counsel was ineffective during plea negotiations by failing to obtain his signature to a plea offer that would have given him a maximum sentence of 13 months.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit
32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection
with the Quarterly Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chen Feng, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The
Companys Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:
 February 20, 2009  /S/ Chen
Feng Chen
Feng, Chief
Financial Officer
STATEMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard J. DeGarmo


Richard J. DeGarmo, Managing Director


Dated: August 23, 2010
**Exhibit
      31.1**




**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**


**and
      Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427**





I,
      Myint
      J. Kyaw, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Yifan Communications, Inc.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report;





4.
      I
      have:





a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
      and





b)
      evaluated the
      effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation;





c)
      disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
      and





5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)
      all
      deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
      control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
      the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      information; and





b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
                March 14, 2006
            /s/
                Myint J.
                Kyaw
              Myint
                J. Kyaw
              Principal
                Executive Officer
September 20, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.S AND S.G.B., JR., CHILDREN

NO. 14-12-00330-CV

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights signed on 

March 28, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record 

and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below 

AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

EXECUTION COPY 
 April 7, 2014 

Mr. James L. Dolan 
 Cablevision Systems Corporation

 1111 Stewart Avenue 
 Bethpage, New York 11714 

 

	 	Re:	Employment Agreement 

 Dear Jim: 

This letter will confirm the agreement of Cablevision Systems Corporation (the “Company”) and you to make certain amendments
to your existing employment agreement, dated as of December 24, 2009, between you and the Company as amended to date (the “Existing Employment Agreement”). 

1. Section 1 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby modified to delete the phrase “President and” from the first and
second sentences of that Section. 
 2. The first sentence of Section 8 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby modified to
delete the following language after the word “terminated”: “(i) for any reason by you during the thirteenth month following a “Change in Control” (as defined in Annex A) of the Company” and to replace such language with
the following language: “(i) [intentionally omitted]” 
 3. The first sentence of Section 12 of the Existing Employment
Agreement is hereby modified to delete the following language after the word “terminated”: “(i) for any reason by you during the thirteenth month following a “Change in Control” (as defined in Annex A) of the Company”
and to replace such language with the following language: “(i) [intentionally omitted]”. 
 4. Except as set forth herein, the
Existing Employment Agreement, as amended to date (including, without limitation, Section 4 of that certain amendment to the Existing Employment Agreement entered into as of February 27, 2013) shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms. The Existing Employment Agreement together with this letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within
that state. 







 If the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding, kindly execute a counterpart of this
letter in the place provided below whereupon this letter shall become a binding agreement between you and the undersigned. 
  

			
	CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
	
	/s/ Gregg G. Seibert
	By:	 	Gregg G. Seibert
	Title:	 	Vice Chairman & Chief Financial Officer


  

	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	/s/ James L. Dolan
	James L. Dolan
1999-NMCA-054

979 P.2d 251

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Salvador BENAVIDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18,699.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

March 17, 1999.

Certiorari Granted, No. 25,548, April 27, 1999.

Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, Steven S Suttle, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, for Appellee.

Paul J. Kennedy, Albuquerque, for Appellant.

OPINION GRANTING REHEARING

APODACA, Judge.

{1} Defendant filed a motion for rehearing after this Court filed its opinion on December 23, 1998. That opinion reversed the substantive perjury convictions against Defendant because of the trial court’s failure to instruct on the essential element of materiality-

{2} In his motion for rehearing and supporting memorandum, Defendant points out that a jury in a conspiracy prosecution must be instructed on all of the essential elements of the crime Defendant is alleged to have conspired to *commit*unless those essential elements are covered by the instructions relating to the substantive offenses. The jury in this case was not instructed on those essential elements, either in conjunction with the conspiracy instruction or in the instruction relating to the substantive offenses. Consequently, Defendant argues in his motion that the conspiracy conviction under count five of the indictment should have also been reversed based on the rationale contained in this Court’s opinion relating to the substantive offenses.

{3} Having considered Defendant’s motion, as well as the State’s response, we agree with Defendant that his conviction of conspiracy to commit perjury under count five should also be reversed for the reasons noted above. The case is therefore remanded to the trial court for a new trial on count five as well as on counts one and three.

{4} Because we are remanding for a new trial on those three counts, it is not necessary to address Defendant’s other point for reversal.

{5} IT IS SO ORDERED.

HARTZ and ARMIJO, JJ., concur.