alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Each of the undersigned officers of Bancorp Energy, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, in the capacities of each indicated by their signature, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009  (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 8, 2011/s/  Dempsey MorkDempsey Mork, Chief Executive Officer
(the Principal Executive Officer)  Date: August 8, 2011/s/  Neville PearsonNeville Pearson, Chief Financial Officer
(the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)


| |  | 
| |  | 
| |  |
#### Robert D. Fitch, Jr., appellant, v. Cass County, Nebraska, appellee.

297 N. W. 905

Filed May 2, 1941.

No. 31161.

*J. A. Campwell,*for appellant.

*Walter H. Smith, contra.*

Heard before Paine, Carter and Messmore, JJ., and Spear and Falloon, District Judges.

Carter, J.

This is an action to recover for mileage which the plain*484tiff claims is due him as a result of his serving as county surveyor of Cass county from November, 1932, to January, 1939. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the petition and, when plaintiff stood thereon, dismissed the action. Plaintiff thereupon appealed to this court.

The petition alleges that plaintiff, while he was county surveyor, filed claims with the board of county commissioners for 24,347 miles actually and necessarily traveled in going to and from work. The claims were allowed for this mileage at the rate of 5 cents per mile. After his term of office expired, plaintiff filed a claim for an additional 5 cents per mile for the 24,347 miles traveled, in accordance with section 33-119, Comp. St. 1929, which claim was disallowed by the board of county commissioners. An appeal was taken to the district court, where a general demurrer to the petition was sustained and the action dismissed. The correctness of this ruling is now before this court.

We think this case is controlled by the recent decision in *Hansen v. Cheyenne County,*p. 484, *post,*297 N. W. 902, and on the authority of that case we conclude that the trial court erred in sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                         NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                   --------------------------------------------
                                                       1996            1995            1994
                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Net loss.........................................  $(22,981,000)   $(36,631,000)   $(16,207,000)
                                                   ============    ============    ============
Weighted average shares outstanding during the
  period.........................................    26,029,000      23,374,000      22,825,000
                                                   ============    ============    ============
Net loss per common share........................  $      (0.88)   $      (1.57)   $      (0.71)
                                                   ============    ============    ============
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT14.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration StatementNo. 333-129945, 333-121164, 333-88854, 333-100522, 333-51446, 333-09368,and 333-1796 on Form F-4, S-8, F-3, S-8, S-8, S-8, and S-8, respectively, andin Post-Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration StatementNo. 333-117110 on Form F-3, in Post Effective Amendment No. 1 toRegistration Statement No. 333-09368 on Form S-8, and inPost-Effective Amendment No. 2 on Form S-8 to Form F-4 toRegistration Statement No. 333-15409, of Kerzner International Limited ofour report dated February 28, 2006 relating to the financial statements ofTrading Cove Associates, which appears in this annual report on Form 20-Fof Kerzner International Limited for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| Hartford, CT                   |
| March 28, 2006            |
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 418

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received, read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

AN ACT

For the relief of Arthur J. Carron, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 418 RFS

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

2 The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of

3 title 31, United States Code, shall not apply with respect

4 to a claim by Arthur J. Carron, Jr., of Bark River, Michi5 gan, for amounts due to him by the Department of the

6 Navy. The amounts due are represented by the following

7 checks that were received but not negotiated by Arthur

8 J. Carron, Jr.:

9 (1) Treasury check number 2,831,843, dated

10 October 18, 1966, in the amount of $10,850.74 for

11 salary and expenses.

12 (2) Treasury check number 10,445,856, dated

13 January 29, 1971, in the amount of $1,361.00 for

14 salary and expenses.

15 (3) Treasury check number 71,681,041, dated

16 April 1, 1971, in the amount of $562.25 for retire17 ment pay.

18 SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

19 Section 1 shall apply only if Arthur J. Carron, Jr.,

20 or his authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant

21 to such section before the expiration of the 3-month period

22 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ramin (“Ron”) Najafi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 11, 2010


/s/ Ramin ("Ron") NajafiRamin (“Ron”) NajafiChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of April 30, 1998 and the Statement of 
Consolidated Earnings for the year ended April 30, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                          284679
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 11977973
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   18972587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              32203952
<PP&E>                                        16018839
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4769289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                48641206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         11495266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         28812
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  48641206
<SALES>                                       85650598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              85650598
<CGS>                                         77193764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5624346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1995634
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 836854
<INCOME-TAX>                                    310962
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    525892
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
----

| Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. |                              | 500 N Dearborn St, Suite 605 |
|------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------|
| A Private Equity       | Chicago, IL  60654 |
| Holding Company        | (312) 379-1800               |

----

|   | 1. | Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. (“Obligor’) hereby promises to pay to the order of Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC (“Payee’) the principal sum of Four Hundred Thirty Eight Thousand Dollars ($438,000); and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                          | /s/ Gary Rosenberg |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------|--------|--------|
|                         | Gary Rosenberg     |   |   |
| Its:     | CEO                |   |   |
|                         |               |   |   |

| By:                          | /s/ Josh Goldstein |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------------------|--------|--------|
|                         | Josh Goldstein     |   |   |
| Its:     | General Partner    |   |   |
|                         |               |   |   |

----
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. George P. Sawyer and Others v. The Board of Railroad Commissioners of the State of New York and Others. (4 cases consolidated.)

—Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Filed 9/18/2015 3:34:52 PM Billy Fox

District Clerk Bowie County, Texas Karen Raney, Deputy
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.57


 


 Maximum Mortgage
Contract


 


Contract No.: 2013JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI13140823


 


Mortgagor: Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd


 


Mortgagee : CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : August 23, 2013


 


Mortgage Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party
B (Pledgee) has lent to Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd., Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Pledge Guarantee
hereunder for Party B.


  


Maximum Amount: RMB150, 000,000


 


Mortgage Term : August 23, 2013 to February 2, 2014


 


 Collateral: The assets Party A mortgages
to Party B as Collateral are listed in Maximum Mortgage Contract (No.2013JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI13140823-01). The appraised value of
the Collateral is RMB 1,426,744,639.05
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Home
Buy & Sell Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Samuel J. Alderson, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Samuel
      J. AldersonSamuel  J.
      Alderson
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                April
      8, 2008
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1055

DONALD BURRELL; APRIL BURRELL; 911 RESTORATION OF BALTIMORE, INC. , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. 911 RESTORATION FRANCHISE, INC.; IDAN SHPIZEAR; PELEG LINDENBERG; SHAY KALMANOVICH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 02278

- JKB )

Submitted : July 19, 2018 Decided: August 3, 2018

Before KING, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Harry Martin Rifkin , LAW OFFICES OF HARRY M. RIFKIN , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants. James E

. Dickerman , ECCLESTON AND WOLF, P

. C

. , Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order dismissing their case and compelling arbitration . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P . 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on November 17, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on December 26, 2017 . Because Appellants failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARTIN J. JEPPESEN,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

 09-CV-12871

vs.

 PAUL D. BORMAN

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SECURITY, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

This is a social security case. Plaintiff challenges the final decision of Defendant denying

his application for Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act. The parties have

filed cross-motions for summary judgment. On May 27, 2010, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which he recommends that Defendant’s Motion

for Summary Judgment be granted and that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied.

No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. 

The Court has had an opportunity to fully review this matter and finds that Magistrate Judge

Whalen has reached the proper conclusions for the proper reasons. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Whalen’s R&R dated May 27, 2010, is accepted and

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 16, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

June 16, 2010.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
|Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Arch Wireless, Inc. (the Company) for the period
 ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
 Report), the undersigned, J. Roy Pottle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)       
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and



(2)       
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
 and results of operations of the Company.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: March 1, 2004 |  | /s/ J. Roy PottleJ. Roy PottleExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Deng
Shan, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Largo Vista Group, Ltd.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to  the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c)
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely  affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date:
April 15, 2005
 
 /s/Deng
Shan
 ---------------------------------------
 Deng
Shan, Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

UNION SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tamrha V. Mangelsen, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 4, 2009



/s/ Tamrha V. MangelsenTamrha V. MangelsenTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132247 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, SHARON ROBERTSON, personal Justices representative of the Estate of GORDON ROBERTSON, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132247 COA: 269752 Bay CC: 05-003647-NH S.M. ASCHERL, M.D., BAY RADIOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS, P.C., and BAY MEDICAL CE NTER, a/k/a BAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 29, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the order of the Cour t of Appeals, which ordered dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, and we REMAND this case to the Bay Circuit Court for entry of an orde r dismissing the complaint without prejudice. See Kirkaldy v

Rim , 478 Mich 581 (2007). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this

Court.

d0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk