alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4128

To amend title 23, United States Code, concerning eligibility for grants

to implement alcohol-impaired driving counter measures.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1996

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, concerning eligibility

for grants to implement alcohol-impaired driving counter

measures.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVING COUNTER MEAS4 URES.

5 Section 410(d) of title 23, United States Code, is

6 amended by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(8) Establishment of a vehicle forfeiture sys8 tem for persons operating a motor vehicle with a li9 cense which has been suspended or revoked as a re-
2

•HR 4128 IH

1 sult of operating a motor vehicle while under the in2 fluence of alcohol.’’.

Æ
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Vernon D. IMGARTEN, Appellant.

No. WD 40408.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 29, 1988.

Allan D. Seidel, Trenton, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Carrie Francke, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and TURNAGE and COVINGTON, JJ.

*930ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of driving while intoxicated — third offense, § 577.010, RSMo 1986, and sentence of confinement in county jail for one year.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 30.-25(b).
[Cite as State ex rel. Gonzalez v. Astrab , 2012-Ohio-3582.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97922



## STATE EX REL. EDGAR GONZALEZ

RELATOR

vs. 

## JUDGE MICHAEL ASTRAB, ET AL.

RESPONDENTS



### JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED

Writ of Mandamus and Procedendo Motion No. 452465

Order No. 456884

RELEASE DATE: August 9, 2012RELATOR Edgar Gonzalez No. 593-445 Lorain Correctional Institution 2075 South Avon Belden Road Grafton, Ohio 44044

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS
William D. Mason, Esq. Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss, Esq. Assistant County Prosecutor 8 th Floor, Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, J.: {¶1} Relator, Edgar Gonzalez, is the defendant in State v. Gonzalez , Cuyahoga
C.P. No. CR-504595, which has been assigned to respondent judge, a member of
respondent court. Gonzalez complains that the court of common pleas imposed sentence
without properly addressing the issue of allied offenses of similar import under R.C.
2941.25. Gonzalez argues that his sentence is void and requests this court to issue a writ
of mandamus and/or procedendo to compel respondents to have him returned to
Cuyahoga County “to be sentenced to a lawful sentence * * *.” Complaint, ¶ 11. {¶2} Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss and argue that relief in
mandamus and/or procedendo is not appropriate. We agree. {¶3} In State ex rel. Agosto v. Gallagher , 8th Dist. No. 97760, 2011-Ohio-4514,
aff’d , 131 Ohio St.3d 176, 2012-Ohio-563, 962 N.E.2d 796, the relator complained that
his sentence was void because the court of common pleas improperly sentenced him to
allied offenses. Agosto requested relief in mandamus and/or procedendo to compel the
respondents — the court of common pleas and a judge of that court — to bring him back

to that court to receive a “lawful sentence.” Id . at ¶ 2. We denied Agosto’s claim for
relief and the Supreme Court affirmed observing:
Moreover, Agosto’s allied-offense claims are nonjurisdictional and are not cognizable in an extraordinary-writ action. See Smith v. Voorhies , 119 Ohio St.3d 345, 2008-Ohio-4479, 894 N.E.2d 44, ¶ 10 (habeas corpus).Agosto had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to raise his claims in an appeal from his sentencing entry.

Id . at ¶ 3. {¶4} The Supreme Court has stated clearly that original actions do not provide a
remedy for allied-offense claims. As a consequence, we must hold that Gonzalez’s
complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. {¶5} Accordingly, respondents’ motion to dismiss is granted. Relator to pay
costs. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties notice of this judgment and
its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). {¶6} Complaint dismissed.

KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, JUDGE
MARY J. BOYLE, P.J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR
#### Robert BURRELL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 7786.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 15, 1938.

H. R. Ratcliff, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

William McClanahan, U. S. Atty., of Memphis, Tenn.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

No reversible error appearing upon the record, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                      STATE OF ORGANIZATION
------------------                                      ---------------------
Summit Properties Partnership, L.P.                           Delaware
Summit Financing, Inc.                                        Maryland
Summit Southwest I, Inc.                                      Maryland
Summit Southwest GP, Inc.                                     Maryland
Nagrom, Inc.                                                Pennsylvania
Summit Management Company                                     Maryland
Summit Apartment Builders, Inc.                                Florida
Stony Point/Summit Limited Partnership                        Virginia
Summit/Belmont Limited Partnership                            Virginia
Henderson/McGuire Partners (Limited Partnership)              Delaware
McGregor/McGuire Limited Partnership                           Florida
Sand Lake Joint Venture                                        Florida
Portofino Place, Ltd.                                          Florida
Foxcroft East Associates                                   North Carolina
Summit Stonefield, LLC                                      Pennsylvania
Summit Southwest, L.P.                                        Delaware
Summit Valley Brook, LLC                                      Delaware
Summit Shiloh, LLC                                             Georgia
Summit Sweetwater, LLC                                         Georgia
Summit Grandview, LLC                                      North Carolina
Summit Grand Parc, LLC                                        Delaware
Summit Roosevelt, LLC                                         Delaware
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our reports dated March 9,
2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule and
internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of
Stratasys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration
Statements of Stratasys, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108816, effective
December 2, 2003) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-93362, effective June 9, 1995,
File No. 333-32782, effective March 17, 2000 and File No. 333-116210, effective
June 4, 2004).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP Minneapolis,
Minnesota March 9, 2009

---
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.11



Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
This Amendment No. 1to Amended And Restated Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is effective as of January 1, 2020 (“Effective Date”) by and between Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, a Maryland corporation (“Corporation”), and J. Christopher Douglas (“Officer”).
Recitals
Whereas, the Corporation has heretofore employed the Officer as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer under the terms of an employment agreement dated February 2, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”); and
Whereas, the parties desire to modify the Employment Agreement with this amendment; 
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby affirmed, the parties hereto agree to the following to amend the Employment Agreement as of the Effective Date:


1.    Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in its place:
3.1    Base Salary. As payment for the services to be rendered by Officer as provided in Section 1 and subject to the terms and conditions of Section 2, Corporation agrees to pay to Officer a “Base Salary” at the rate of $475,000 per annum payable in equal semi-monthly installments, or in such other periodic installments as mutually agreed to by Corporation and Officer. 
2.    This Amendment represents the entire understanding among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and, as of the Effective Date, this Amendment supersedes any and all prior understandings, agreements, plans and negotiations, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof. All modifications to the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such modification is sought. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains unaltered and in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 


[Execution Page Follows]






Exhibit 10.11



EXECUTION PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the 12th day of February, to be effective as of the Effective Date.
Corporation:
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated


                                    	
		
	By:
	/s/ John M. Bryant, Jr.

	Name:
	John M. Bryant, Jr.

	Title:
	Executive Vice President and General Counsel










Officer:
                    	
	
	/s/ J. Christopher Douglas

	J. Christopher Douglas
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4074

To require that jewelry imported from another country be indelibly marked

with the country of origin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 1996

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To require that jewelry imported from another country be

indelibly marked with the country of origin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKING OF IMPORTED JEWELRY.

4 (a) MARKING REQUIREMENT.—By no later than the

5 date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this

6 Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe and im7 plement regulations that require that all jewelry described

8 in subsection (b) that enters the customs territory of the

9 United States have the English name of the country of

10 origin indelibly marked in a conspicuous place on such
2

•HR 4074 IH

1 jewelry by cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping, or

2 some other permanent method. The exceptions from mark3 ing requirements provided in section 304 of the Tariff Act

4 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) shall not apply to jewelry sub5 ject to this section.

6 (b) JEWELRY.—The jewelry referred to in subsection

7 (a) is any article described in heading 7113 or 7117 of

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

9 SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

10 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘enters the customs

11 territory of the United States’’ means enters, or is with12 drawn from warehouse for consumption, in the customs

13 territory of the United States.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 443

To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1995

Mr. REGULA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To provide for the retention of the name of Mount McKinley.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, notwithstanding any other authority of law, the

4 mountain located 63 degrees, 04 minutes, 12 seconds

5 north, by 151 degrees, 00 minutes, 18 seconds west, shall

6 continue to be named and referred to for all purposes as

7 Mount McKinley.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NO. 09-13562

HON.PATRICK J. DUGGAN

GWENDOLYN HILL,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

DANIELLE A. BASS-SMITH,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ELECTRONIC

FILING REQUIREMENT

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

 District Courthouse, City of Detroit, County

 of Wayne, State of Michigan on September 22, 2009.

This matter is before the Court on Motion for Relief from Electronic Filing 

Requirement by Douglas Spicer, attorney for the Plaintiff; therefore

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Relief from Electronic Filing Requirement

be and the same is hereby GRANTED.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: September 22, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on September 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-13562-PJD-MKM Doc # 6 Filed 09/22/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 22
#### John O’Brien and John C. Sheehan, Respondents, v. Edward R. Thomas and Others, Composing the Firm of Thomas & Post, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H.R. 483

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 7 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 1995

Received; read the first time

AN ACT

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit

medicare select policies to be offered in all States, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEDICARE SELECT POLICIES TO

4 BE OFFERED IN ALL STATES FOR AN EX5 TENDED PERIOD.

6 Section 4358(c) of the Omnibus Budget Reconcili7 ation Act of 1990, as amended by section 172(a) of the

8 Social Security Act Amendments of 1994, is amended to

9 read as follows:
2

HR 483 RDS

1 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—(1) The amendments made

2 by this section shall only apply—

3 ‘‘(A) in 15 States (as determined by the Sec4 retary of Health and Human Services) and such

5 other States as elect such amendments to apply to

6 them, and

‘‘(B) subject to paragraph (2), during the 81 7 ⁄2

8 year period beginning with 1992.

9 ‘‘(2)(A) The Secretary of Health and Human Serv10 ices shall conduct a study that compares the health care

11 costs, quality of care, and access to services under medi12 care select policies with that under other medicare supple13 mental policies. The study shall be based on surveys of

14 appropriate age-adjusted sample populations. The study

15 shall be completed by December 31, 1998.

16 ‘‘(B) The Secretary shall determine during 1999

17 whether the amendments made by this section shall remain in effect beyond the 81 18 ⁄2 year period described in

19 paragraph (1)(B). Such amendments shall remain in ef20 fect beyond such period unless the Secretary determines

21 (based on the results of the study under subparagraph

22 (A)) that—

23 ‘‘(i) such amendments have not resulted in sav24 ings of premiums costs to those enrolled in medicare

25 select policies (in comparison to their enrollment in
3

HR 483 RDS

1 medicare supplemental policies that are not medicare

2 select policies and that provide comparable cov3 erage),

4 ‘‘(ii) there have been significant additional ex5 penditures under the medicare program as a result

6 of such amendments, or

7 ‘‘(iii) access to and quality of care has been sig8 nificantly diminished as a result of such amend9 ments.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives April 6, 1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                          SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
              PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      I, Linda K. Blake, am Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of
SigmaTron International, Inc. (the "Company").

      This certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
connection with the filing of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended April 30, 2004 (the "Report").

      I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

      (a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78 m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: July 20, 2004

                                      /s/ Linda K. Blake
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Linda K. Blake
                                      Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                      Treasurer of SigmaTron International, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)*





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, James C. Dyer, Chief Executive Officer of Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C., and Alex G. Stallings, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C., certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/ James C. Dyer, IV


James C. Dyer, IV


Chief Executive Officer of


Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,


general partner of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P.





November 9, 2010








/s/ Alex G. Stallings


Alex G. Stallings


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of


Blueknight Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,


general partner of Blueknight Energy Partners, L.P.





Noember 9, 2010

















*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000914804
<NAME> FIRST FORTIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           117,473
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 117,473
<CASH>                                           7,453
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              19,764
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,898
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 95,724
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  10,304
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,898
<PREMIUMS>                                      51,846
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              7,907
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 361
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     682
<BENEFITS>                                      43,883
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        (56)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            17,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (63)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (124)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (124)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  61,482
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             25,424
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                3,666
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              15,393
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                14,681
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 60,498
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-134014, 333-132008, 333-124900, 333-118646, 333-118647, 333-99337, 333-68387, 333-48969, 333-35193, 333-24621, 33-90976, and 33-74780 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 26, 2009, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedules of Health Net Inc. (which report expressed an unqualified opinion, and included an explanatory paragraph relating to Health Net, Inc.’s adoption as of January 1, 2007 of Financial AccountingStandards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting For Uncertainty in Income Taxes*, and to the Company’s change in its method of accounting for share-based compensation in 2006 upon adoption of FASB StatementNo. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment*), and the effectiveness of Health Net, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Health Net, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP 

Los Angeles, California

February 26, 2009