alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        |  |                                                     
| |  | ---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | Date: February 6, 2009 |  | /s/ Joseph J. Bouffard                              
| |  |                        |  | Joseph J. Bouffard                                  
| |  |                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
| |  |                       
| |  | Date: February 6, 2009 |  | /s/ Anthony R. Cole                                 
| |  |                        |  | Anthony R. Cole                                     
| |  |                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, *v.*Bird S. Coler, President of the Borough of Brooklyn, Appellant.

*Railroad—construction of road—consent of highway commissioners.*

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Special Term, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 22d day of January, 1909, granting the relator’s application for a peremptory writ of mandamus.

Burr, J.:

The validity of the consent given on February 5, 1894, by the highway commissioners of the town of Flatlands to the construction of a street surface railroad .upon Nostraud avenue, from the line dividing the former towns of Flatbush and Flatlands to the line of division between said town of Flatlands and the former town of Gravesend, has recently been considered by this court and its validity affirmed. *(People ex rel. Westminster Heights Co.*v. *Coler,*121 App. Div. 293.) The relator is clearly entitled to maintain this proceeding if such consent was valid. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RAS JAH MIKES MATTA, a.k.a. Ras

Yah Mikes Matta,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-30363

D.C. No. 1:10-cr-00010-RFC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Richard F. Cebull, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2012**

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Ras Jah Mikes Matta appeals from the 96-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-30363

Matta contends that the district court erred in denying him an adjustment for

acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 on the basis of his conduct in

jail between the time of his plea and his sentencing. The district court was

permitted to consider such conduct and did not clearly err in determining that

Matta was not entitled to an adjustment. See United States v. Mara, 523 F.3d

1036, 1038-39 (9th Cir. 2008) (upholding denial of an adjustment under section

3E1.1 on the basis of a jailhouse fight pending sentencing and observing that

“post-offense conduct can shed significant light on the genuineness of a

defendant’s claimed remorse”) (internal quotations omitted). The 96-month

sentence at the upper end of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range was

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and

the totality of the circumstances. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993

(9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         The undersigned hereby certify that Crown NorthCorp, Inc.'s report on
Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and the
information contained in the report fairly represents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the company.



Dated: March 27, 2003         By:      /s/ Ronald E. Roark
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                       Ronald E. Roark, Chairman and
                                        Chief Executive Officer



                              By:      /s/ Rick L. Lewis
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                       Rick L. Lewis, Vice President,
                                        Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                        Officer



                              By:      /s/ Stephen W. Brown
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                       Stephen W. Brown, Secretary


   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Crown NorthCorp, Inc.
 and will be retained by Crown NorthCorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
               and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 33-80938) pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Plan, the
Registration Statements (Forms S-8, No. 33-88074 and No. 333-07887) pertaining
to the 1994 Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No.
333-07889) pertaining to the 1995 Director Option Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-00758) of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and in the
related Prospectus of our report dated February 27, 1997, except for Note 13, as
to which the date is March 27, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of NeXstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Denver, Colorado
March 28, 1997
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 no. 33-80147 and 333-52044) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Option
Plan, 1994 Director's Stock Option Plan and Directors' Warrants and 2000
Directors' Stock Option Plan and 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan of SigmaTron
International, Inc. of our report dated June 29, 2001, except for Note 8, as to
which the date is July 11, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of SigmaTron International, Inc. and our report dated
June 29, 2001 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of SMT
Unlimited L.P. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of SigmaTron
International, Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2001.



                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG



Chicago, Illinois
August 8, 2001
#### Lilian H. FOSDICK v. B. F. KEITH-COLUMBUS COMPANY.

No. 7936.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 16, 1938.

Robert Fosdick, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Kenneth B. Johnston, of Columbus, Ohio, and Ulmer, Berne & Gordon, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be, and the same is, dismissed, pursuant to motion of appellee.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Report on Form 10-Q ("Form 10-Q") of China Jianye Fuel, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Haisheng Fei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Haishen Fei
 Haishen Fei, Principal Financial Officer
 
 May 17, 2010
 
 This certification accompanies this Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### AMERICAN FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Kate GARDNER, Lola Garrison, A. E. Carter, W. L. Edge, Trading and Doing Business as Mars Hill Bus Line, and Howell Carter, Appellees.

No. 4308.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 25, 1938.

William J. Cocke, Jr., of Asheville, N. C., for appellant.,

T. A. Uzzell, Jr., Thos. L. Johnson, Don C. Young, and Sale, Pennell & Pennell, all of Asheville, N. C., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Case dismissed under rule 20 in accordance with agreement of counsel.
Exhibit 32.1 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ROADSHIPS HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report'), I, Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Michael
Nugent
 Michael
Nugent, Chief Executive Officer
 Date:
October 2, 2009
EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         We, the undersigned directors of the Registrant, hereby severally
constitute and appoint Rick Green our true and lawful attorney and agent, to do
any and all things in our names in the capacities indicated below which said
person may deem necessary or advisable to enable the Registrant to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with the
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, including
specifically, but not limited to, power and authority to sign for us in our
names in the capacities indicated below the annual report and any amendments
thereto; and we hereby approve, ratify, and confirm all that said person shall
do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

/s/ Jim Berry                                                 February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Jim Berry, Director


/s/ Thomas D. Berry                                           February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Thomas D. Berry, Director


/s/ Joe Berry Cannon                                          February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Joe Berry Cannon, Director


/s/ J. Berry Harrison                                         February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
J. Berry Harrison, Director


/s/ Erd M. Johnson                                            February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Erd M. Johnson, Director


/s/ Betty B. Kerns                                            February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Betty B. Kerns, Director

/s/ David P. Lambert                                          February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
David P. Lambert, Director


/s/ Linford R. Pitts                                          February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Linford R. Pitts, Director


/s/ Robert B. Rodgers                                         February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Robert B. Rodgers, Director


/s/ Russell W. Teubner                                        February 26, 2004
-----------------------------------
Russell W. Teubner, Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0137 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SHELBY BRYAN RAGNER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 30 , 20 2 1 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 26 2021

10/26/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0137
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-15875

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:15-cr-00010-WTH-PRL-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMON VALLES, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(November 16, 2017)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal 

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 

997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced 

Case: 16-15875 Date Filed: 11/16/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 

1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by 

comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 

399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes 

waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant 

error).

Case: 16-15875 Date Filed: 11/16/2017 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 19, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Franklin Bancshares, Inc., to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Bank of Franklin, both of 
Meadville, Mississippi.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 29, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-1849 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant. Donald Wayne FOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67177.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defenders, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Donald W. Fogle (“defendant”), appeals the judgment of conviction of the Circuit Court of Marion County entered after a jury convicted defendant of rape, RSMo § 566.030 (RSMo Cum.Supp.1991). Defendant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error of law was committed by the trial court. We further find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgments of the trial and motion courts pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is provided solely for the parties involved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         14,788,765
<SECURITIES>                                   608,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  510,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,029,249
<PP&E>                                         5,675,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,583,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,158,817
<BONDS>                                        232,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32,530
<OTHER-SE>                                     20,159,958
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,583,552
<SALES>                                        1,223,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,317,734
<CGS>                                          799,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,261,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             73,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,016,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,016,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,016,824)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.31)
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 78-4 filed 12/06/10 PageID.2172 Page 1 of 4
Nissan Titan – truck – X61A 

Nissan Frontier – truck – X61B 

Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 78-4 filed 12/06/10 PageID.2173 Page 2 of 4
Nissan Armada – SUV – X61A 

Infiniti QX56 – SUV – X61A 

Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 78-4 filed 12/06/10 PageID.2174 Page 3 of 4
Nissan Xterra – SUV – X61B 

Nissan Pathfinder – SUV – X61B 

Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 78-4 filed 12/06/10 PageID.2175 Page 4 of 4