alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated March 10, 2008 and published in the Federal 
Register on March 19, 2008, (73 FR 14839), Roche Diagnostics 
Operations, Inc., Attn: Regulatory Compliance, 9115 Hague Road, 
Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, made application by renewal to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lysergic acid diethylamide (7315)..........  I
Alphamethadol (9605).......................  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to import the listed controlled substances for 
the manufacture of diagnostic products for distribution to its 
customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the 
registration of Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. to import the basic 
classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public 
interest, and with United States obligations under international 
treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this 
time. DEA has investigated Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. to ensure 
that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. 
The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and Sec.  958(a), and 
in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted 
registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed.

    Dated: July 30, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-18064 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT TEAM,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-11915

VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER TERMINATING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL 

On November 6, 2009, the court conducted a status conference in the abovecaptioned case with counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendant. During the conference,

the court discussed with the parties three outstanding motions to compel [Dkt. ## 7, 15,

& 16] and one outstanding motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 11]. The parties agreed that

recently produced discovery materials and a deposition resolved all issues raised by the

three outstanding motions to compel. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion to Compel Production of Documents”

[Dkt. # 7], “Motion to Compel Production of Insurance Documents from Barton Malow

Company” [Dkt. # 15], and “Motion to Compel Documents from AECOM Services of

Michigan, Inc.” [Dkt. # 16] are TERMINATED AS MOOT. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: November 6, 2009

2:09-cv-11915-RHC-PJK Doc # 18 Filed 11/06/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 351
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\09-11915.DPSPMT.Term.Mot.Compel.Moot.wpd

2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, November 6, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-11915-RHC-PJK Doc # 18 Filed 11/06/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 352
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Acquired Sales Corp. a Nevada corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Gerard M. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

a.
     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); andb.
     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gerard M. JacobsGerard M. Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated May 15, 2009

---
<page>							EXHIBIT 31.02

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
   for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
   procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
   15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

  b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and



<page>
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal controls over financial
      reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
      the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
      or other employees who have a significant role in the
      registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   March 15, 2004      /s/Jeffrey D. Hahn
                     Jeffrey D. Hahn
                               Chief Financial Officer,
                               Demeter Management Corporation,
                               general partner of the registrant
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MAGNUM
RESOURCES, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,076,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    64,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,780,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,892,000
<PP&E>                                       4,533,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,262,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,193,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,645,000
<BONDS>                                        593,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,791,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,193,000
<SALES>                                     13,667,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,667,000
<CGS>                                       10,463,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,463,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,099,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             315,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (211,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (191,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 191,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1299-000]


Merck & Co., Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

August 1, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Merck & Co., Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 21, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d79192859498b9bbbeb9b284a2a7a7b8a5a397b1b2a5b4f9b0b8a1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc8a899e8f83a2a0a5a2a99fb9bcbca3beb88caaa9beafe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18263 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b)
Certification













Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Jianye Fuel, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended December 31,
2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  March
      13, 2008
            By:
      /s/ Jianye
      Wang


Jianye Wang, Chief Executive
Officer


and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BENNITA CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

AEROTEK, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-cv-12932

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

(docket no. 40) AND GRANTING AEROTEK'S

 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (docket no. 33)

Bennita Crawford filed this employment discrimination action pro se on July 24, 2009.

The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Crawford

subsequently retained counsel. Aerotek moved for summary judgment on April 13, 2011.

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") on February 17,

2012, after taking the motions under consideration. He suggests that the Court grant

Aerotek's motion. Crawford asked for additional time to object to the Report, and the Court

granted an extension until March 12, 2012. Nonetheless, Crawford still failed to file

objections prior to the extended cutoff date.

Civil Rule 72(b) governs review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

De novo review of the magistrate judge’s findings is only required if the parties “serve and

file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ.

P. 72(b)(2). Nevertheless, because a district judge always retains jurisdiction over a motion

after referring it to a magistrate judge, he is entitled to review the magistrate judge's

findings of fact and conclusions of law on his own initiative. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.

140, 154 (1985) (clarifying that while a district court judge need not review a report and

2:09-cv-12932-SJM-MJH Doc # 42 Filed 03/20/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 687
2

recommendation “de novo if no objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by

the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other

standard”).

Because Crawford did not file objections, de novo review of the Report's conclusions

is not required. Having reviewed the Report's analysis, in light of the record, the Court finds

that its conclusions are factually based and legally sound. Accordingly, it will adopt the

Report's findings, grant the motion for summary judgment, and dismiss this case.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report (docket no. 40) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Aerotek's motion for summary judgment (docket no.

33) is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III 

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge

Dated: March 20, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on March 20, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12932-SJM-MJH Doc # 42 Filed 03/20/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 688
Exhibit 31.2
 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.];(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael LeslerExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer 32
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4127

For the relief of David R. W. Light.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1996

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of David R. W. Light.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO REMAIN TEMPORARILY IN

4 THE UNITED STATES FOR DAVID R. W. LIGHT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General—

6 (1) shall refrain from deporting David R. W.

7 Light from the United States and permit him to re8 main temporarily in the United States notwithstand9 ing section 241(a) of the Immigration and National10 ity Act; and

11 (2) shall authorize David R. W. Light to engage

12 in employment in the United States and provide him
2

•HR 4127 IH

1 with an ‘‘employment authorized’’ endorsement or

2 other appropriate work permit.

3 (b) GROUNDS FOR DEPORTATION.—The stay of de4 portation under subsection (a) shall apply only to grounds

5 for deportation that are based on the expiration of the

6 most recent nonimmigrant visa issued to David R. W.

7 Light under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Immigration and

8 Nationality Act.

9 (c) DURATION OF STAY OF DEPORTATION AND

10 WORK AUTHORIZATION.—The stay of deportation and

11 work authorization under subsection (a) shall be effective

12 during the 3-year period beginning on the date of the en13 actment of this Act.

Æ
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JACQUELINE REYNOLDS, as the Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF DEBBIE REYNOLDS

- JONES

, Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 2

- 578

[ March 30, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Michel e Towbin Singer

, Judge; L.T. Case No. CA CE1 9

- 025085

.

Pierre A. Louis and Alibia N. White of Louis Law Group, PLLC, Miami,

for appellant.

Steven J. Chackman of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, Hollywood, and

Elizabeth K. Russo of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C ONNER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Fred
O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that:





The
Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Fred
      O’ConnorFred
      O’Connor, Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      May 21, 2008