alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO





I, James M. DeMesa, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MIGENIX Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.





|      |                  |                               |                        
|----- | ---------------- | ----------------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: | January 15, 2007 |                              
|      |                  | James M. DeMesa              
|By:   | James DeMesa   |                               | Chief Executive Officer
|      |                  | (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6253
CARLOS ORTIZ, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BLEDSOE, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Lee County, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-512-7) Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlos Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carlos Ortiz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeOrtiz v. Bledsoe , No. CA-05-512-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We grant Ortiz’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard AMMONS, Appellant.

No. WD 50270.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Submitted Dec. 7, 1995.

Decided March 5, 1996.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Amy Sneirson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Richard Ammons appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree, § 569.020 RSMo 1994, and for armed criminal action, § 471.015 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive prison terms of nineteen years and three year’s, respectively. After careful consideration of Ammons’ point on appeal, this court concludes that the trial court did not err. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JACQUELINE REYNOLDS, as the Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF DEBBIE REYNOLDS-JONES,

Appellant,

v.

UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-578

[March 30, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michele Towbin Singer, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-

025085.

Pierre A. Louis and Alibia N. White of Louis Law Group, PLLC, Miami, 

for appellant.

Steven J. Chackman of Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, Hollywood, and 

Elizabeth K. Russo of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 477

To amend the Clean Air Act to allow emission reductions caused by fleet

turnover to be credited to the emission reduction requirements of the Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 11, 1995

Mr. DELAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to allow emission reductions

caused by fleet turnover to be credited to the emission

reduction requirements of the Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FLEET TURNOVER EMISSION REDUCTIONS.

4 Section 182(b)(1)(C) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

5 7401 and following) is amended by adding the following

6 at the end thereof: ‘‘Emission reduction attributable to

7 fleet turnover shall also be creditable against such re8 quired reduction.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       7
<LEGEND>
EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EVEREST
REINSURANCE  HOLDINGS,  INC.'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
                                                     
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   4,100,575
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                               146,274
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                         4,286,431
<CASH>                                    39,326
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                       981,959
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                    70,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         5,996,728
<POLICY-LOSSES>                        3,800,041
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                      284,640
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     509
<OTHER-SE>                             1,478,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           5,996,728
<PREMIUMS>                             1,068,010
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      244,909
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          (765)
<OTHER-INCOME>                             3,046
<BENEFITS>                               778,404
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>               11,410
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                     312,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          212,676
<INCOME-TAX>                              47,479
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      165,197
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             165,197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               3.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                               3.26
<RESERVE-OPEN>                         2,749,124
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                      752,349
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                         26,055
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                       192,404
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                         450,824
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                        2,884,300
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                  (26,055)
                                

</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4286

To amend the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 to provide for the establishment

of a toll-free telephone number for the reporting of stolen and abandoned

passenger motor vehicles, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 to provide for

the establishment of a toll-free telephone number for

the reporting of stolen and abandoned passenger motor

vehicles, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Car Find Act of

5 1996’’.
2

•HR 4286 IH

1 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUM2 BER FOR REPORTING OF STOLEN AND ABAN3 DONED VEHICLES.

4 Title I of the Anti Car Theft Act of 1992 (106 Stat.

5 3384–3389) is amended by adding at the end the follow6 ing:

7 ‘‘Subtitle D—Reporting of Stolen

8 and Abandoned Vehicles

9 ‘‘SEC. 151. ESTABLISHMENT OF TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE

10 NUMBER.

11 ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—Not later than 1 year after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney Gen13 eral shall establish and publicize a toll-free telephone num14 ber that individuals may use to report that their passenger

15 motor vehicle has been stolen and that individuals may

16 use to report the location of any abandoned passenger

17 motor vehicle.

18 ‘‘(b) USE OF INFORMATION.—The Attorney General

19 shall use information obtained through the use of the toll20 free telephone number to assist Federal, State, and local

21 law enforcement officials, insurance carriers, and other ap22 propriate persons.

23 ‘‘(c) FEES.—The Attorney General is authorized to

24 collect fees from insurance carriers and other appropriate

25 persons to offset the costs of establishing and maintaining
3

•HR 4286 IH

1 the toll-free telephone number. Such fees shall be depos2 ited in the general fund of the Treasury.

3 ‘‘(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

4 is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

5 amounts equivalent to the amounts collected in fees pursu6 ant to subsection (c), as well as such other sums as may

7 be necessary.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4213 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4213

  To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain lands 
                     located in Hinsdale, Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 1996

 Mr. McInnis (for himself and Mr. Thornberry) introduced the following 
         bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain lands 
                     located in Hinsdale, Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LARSON AND FRIENDS CREEK EXCHANGE.

    In exchange for conveyance to the United States of an equal value 
of offered lands acceptable to the Secretary of the Interior which lie 
within, or in proximity to, the Handies Peak or Red Cloud Peak 
Wilderness Study Areas or the Alpine Loop Backcountry Bi-way in 
Hinsdale County, Colorado, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey 
to Lake City Ranches, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (in this 
section referred to as ``LCR''), approximately 560 acres of selected 
land located in the same county and generally depicted on a map 
entitled ``Larson and Friends Creek Exchange'', dated June 1996. The 
exchange shall be contingent upon LCR granting the Secretary a 
permanent conservation easement on the approximate 440 acre Larson 
Creek portion of the selected lands (as depicted on the map) which 
limits future use of such lands to agricultural, wildlife, 
recreational, or open space purposes. The exchange shall also be 
subject to the standard appraisal requirements and equalization payment 
limitations set forth in section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716), and to reviews and approvals 
relating to threatened species and endangered species, cultural and 
historic resources, and hazardous materials under other Federal laws. 
The costs of such appraisals and reviews shall be paid by LCR. The 
Secretary may credit such payments against the value of the selected 
land, if appropriate, pursuant to section 206(f) of the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(f)).
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1294

GIRMA GEBRIE GEBRE GIORGIS, Petitioner,

v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: November 19, 2008 Decided: January 26, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Roberts, LAW OFFICES OF JAMES A. ROBERTS, Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Girma Gebrie Gebre Giorgis, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision, which denied his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. In his petition for review, Giorgis challenges the finding that he failed to show that his political opinion was “at least one central reason” for the persecution he allegedly faced in Ethiopia in 2005. The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes the Attorney General to confer asylum on any refugee. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a) (2006). It defines a refugee as a person unwilling or unable to return to his native country “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2006) (emphasis added). Following the passage of the REAL ID Act, asylum applicants such as Giorgis who filed their applications after May 11, 2005, must establish that the protected ground

asserted “was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.” REAL ID Act, § 101(a)(3), codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(B)(i) (2006). Based on our review of the record, we agree with the finding that Giorgis failed to

23 establish that his political opinion was a central reason for

the threats that he faced in 2005. Giorgis also argues that he established that he faces a well-founded fear of future persecution if returned to Ethiopia based on his political activities here in the United States. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. EliasZacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Giorgis fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks. We therefore deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHINA PACIFIC PROPERTY INS. CO.,

 

Plaintiff(s),

Case No. 09-13544

vs. 

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS and

PRIORITY CONTAINER LINE CO.,

Defendant(s).

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On March 17, 2011 the parties of record advised the court that a settlement had

been reached and there being no further communication to the court; therefore 

This case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case may be

reopened, if necessary, by motion of either party without the payment of additional fees

or costs. Alternatively, the parties may submit an order of dismissal with prejudice

upon consummation of the settlement.

SO ORDERED.

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 29, 2011

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys/parties of record on 

 April 29, 2011 by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-13544-GCS-PJK Doc # 33 Filed 04/29/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 462
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 1 of 22 Pg ID 23
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 2 of 22 Pg ID 24
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 3 of 22 Pg ID 25
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 4 of 22 Pg ID 26
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 5 of 22 Pg ID 27
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 6 of 22 Pg ID 28
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 7 of 22 Pg ID 29
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 8 of 22 Pg ID 30
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 9 of 22 Pg ID 31
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 10 of 22 Pg ID 32
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 11 of 22 Pg ID 33
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 12 of 22 Pg ID 34
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 13 of 22 Pg ID 35
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 14 of 22 Pg ID 36
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 15 of 22 Pg ID 37
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 16 of 22 Pg ID 38
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 17 of 22 Pg ID 39
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 18 of 22 Pg ID 40
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 19 of 22 Pg ID 41
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 20 of 22 Pg ID 42
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 21 of 22 Pg ID 43
2:09-cv-11586-GER-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 04/28/09 Pg 22 of 22 Pg ID 44
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anoteros, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Chachas, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ George G. Chachas By: George G. Chachas Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: July 15, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 14.1  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT  We consent to the incorporation by reference
in Registration Statement Nos. 333-88854, 333-100522, 333-51446, 333-15409,
333-09368 and 333-1796 of Kerzner International Limited and subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form F-3, S-8, S-8, F-4, S-8 and S-8, respectively, of our report
dated March 29, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2003. Such report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the
Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in 2002, and the restatement of the 2002
and 2001 consolidated financial statements.   /s/
  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPParsippany, New JerseyMarch 29, 2004
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARKEE DESHAWN FELTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-3728

[October 15, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

432017CF000313A, 432017CF000315A, and 432017CF000317A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.