alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ORYX TECHNOLOGY CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                             722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                        93
<INVENTORY>                                        397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,949
<PP&E>                                             800
<DEPRECIATION>                                     310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        107
<COMMON>                                        19,724
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,553
<SALES>                                          8,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,449
<CGS>                                            6,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,473)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,666)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-20025

D-04, SAMUEL L. RIDDLE, JR., HONORABLE AVERN COHN

Defendant.

___________________________________/

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

This is a criminal case. Trial is set for July 12, 2010. On April 6, 2010, the Court

held a status conference with the parties. This order memorializes the matters

discussed at the status conference. 

1. The Court has sent the parties papers used in the first trial as follows:

- Case Summary

- Preliminary Jury Instructions

- Summary of Indictment

- Final Jury Instructions

- Juror Questionnaire

2. The following timeline applies to jury selection:

- By May 15, 2010, the parties shall either agree on the form of the

juror questionnaire or schedule a conference with the Court to

resolve the questionnaire. Exhibit A is the jury selection timeline.
Page 2 of 2

3. The motion cut off date is June 1, 2010.

SO ORDERED

Dated: April 7, 2010 S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, April 7, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rene Johnson, Also Known as Michael Johnson, Appellant.

[678 NYS2d 10]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered April 23, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a determinate term of 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The suppression court properly upheld the warrantless search of defendant’s vehicle. Following a lawful car stop, the police observation of a magazine of ammunition for an automatic pistol provided the police with probable cause to believe that a gun was inside the car. A fair reading of the record supports the hearing court’s finding that rather than conducting an impermissible “second” search, as claimed by defendant, the officers actually continued their initial search, leading to the discovery of the gun and a second magazine.

Defendant’s statements were not the fruit of an unlawful arrest. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the brief detention of defendant and four other occupants of the car during which they were handcuffed and placed on the ground pending the completion of the search of the vehicle was a lawful nonarrest detention *(see, People v Allen,*73 NY2d 378, 379-380). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARKEE DESHAWN FELTON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3728

[ October 15, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Sherwood Bauer, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 432017CF00031 3 A, 432017CF00031 5 A, and 432017CF000317A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER
, G ERBER and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1)                         The Report fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)                         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                14, 2007 | /s/                James Roszel       |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | James                Roszel                                         |
|                           | President                                                           |

----
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Curtis COPE et al., Defendants. William POPEJOY, etc., et al., Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Curtis COPE et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants, Mrs. Irene Morris and the Home Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellees.

No. 73-2316

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 15, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 8,1972.

Harry B. Friedman, Texarkana, Tex., for Curtis Cope.

Howard Waldrop, Lynn Cooksey, Tex-arkana, Tex., for Commercial Standard and Max L. Vaughan.

James N. Haltom, J. R. Hubbard, Texarkana, Tex., for Allstate Ins. and Estate of Leslie E. Mills.

Jerry L. Redfern, Springfield, Mo., John D. Raffaelli, Texarkana, Tex., for Popejoy and Blevins.

William C. Cockrill, Springfield, Mo., for Booth.

Robert Lee Guthrie, Dallas, Tex., for Home Ins. Co.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of Ne.w York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

We have carefully reviewed the evidence in this case and, while we recognize it is the duty of this Court of Appeals to correct clear error, even in findings of fact, the choice by the trier of the facts here was between two permissible views of the weight of the evidence and is not clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. United States v. Yellow Cab Co., 1949, 338 U.S. 338, 341, 70 S.Ct. 177, 94 L.Ed. 150; General Accident Fire and Life Assur. Corp. v. Hardin (5 Cir. 1961) 290 F.2d 862.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 584 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 175
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 584

                          [Report No. 104-131]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                 June 8 (legislative day, June 5), 1995

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

               August 7 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a fish hatchery to 
                           the State of Iowa.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF THE FAIRPORT NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE 
              STATE OF IOWA.

    (a) Conveyance.--Within 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the State of 
Iowa without reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the fish hatchery described in subsection (b) for use 
by the State for purposes of fishery resources management.
    (b) Hatchery Described.--The fish hatchery described in subsection 
(a) is the Fairport National Fish Hatchery located in Muscatine County, 
Iowa, adjacent to State Highway 22 west of Davenport, Iowa, including 
all real property, improvements to real property, and personal 
property.
    (c) Use and Reversionary Interest.--The property conveyed to the 
State of Iowa pursuant to this section shall be used by the State for 
purposes of fishery resources management, and if it is used for any 
other purpose all right, title, and interest in and to all property 
conveyed pursuant to this section shall revert to the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 7, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 175

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 584

                          [Report No. 104-131]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a fish hatchery to 
                           the State of Iowa.

_______________________________________________________________________

               August 7 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 535 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 535

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Corning National 
                Fish Hatchery to the State of Arkansas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 1995

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Corning National 
                Fish Hatchery to the State of Arkansas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corning National Fish Hatchery 
Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CORNING NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO THE STATE OF 
              ARKANSAS.

    (a) Conveyance Requirement.--Within 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to 
the State of Arkansas without reimbursement all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the property described in 
subsection (b), for use by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission as 
part of the State of Arkansas fish culture program.
    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
is the property known as the Corning National Fish Hatchery (popularly 
known as the William H. Donham State Fish Hatchery), located one mile 
west of Corning, Arkansas, on Arkansas State Highway 67 in Clay County, 
Arkansas, consisting of 137.34 acres (more or less), and all 
improvements and related personal property under the control of the 
Secretary that is located on that property, including buildings, 
structures, and equipment.
    (c) Reversionary Interest of United States.--All right, title, and 
interest in property described in subsection (b) shall revert to the 
United States if the property ceases to be used as part of the State of 
Arkansas fish culture program. The State of Arkansas shall ensure that 
the property reverting to the United States is in substantially the 
same or better condition as at the time of transfer.
                                 <all>
```
II

Star Print★

Calendar No. 612

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 531

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

SEPTEMBER 16, 1996

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To designate the Great Western Scenic Trail as a study

trail under the National Trails System Act, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 531 RS1S

1 SECTION 1. POTENTIAL ADDITION OF GREAT WESTERN

2 SCENIC TRAIL TO NATIONAL TRAIL SYSTEM

3 GREAT WESTERN TRAIL.

4 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16

5 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new paragraph:

7 ‘‘(38) The Great Western Scenic Trail, a system of

8 trails to accommodate a variety of travel users in a cor9 ridor of approximately 3,100 miles in length extending

10 from the Arizona-Mexico border to the Idaho-Montana11 Canada border, following the approximate route depicted

12 on the map identified as ‘Great Western Trail Corridor,

13 1988’, which shall be on file and available for public in14 spection in the Office of the Chief of the Forest Service,

15 United States Department of Agriculture. The trail study

16 shall be conducted by the Secretary of Agriculture, in con17 sultation with the Secretary of the Interior, in accordance

18 with subsection (b) and shall include—

19 ‘‘(A) the current status of land ownership and

20 current and potential use along the designated route;

21 ‘‘(B) the estimated cost of acquisition of lands

22 or interests in lands, if any; and
3

HR 531 RS1S

1 ‘‘(C) an examination of the appropriateness of

2 motorized trial use along the trail.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 14,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 612

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 531

AN ACT

To designate the Great Western Scenic Trail as a

and for other purposes.study trail under the National Trails System Act,

SEPTEMBER 16, 1996

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-1972 and File No.  333-05771) and Form S-3
(File No.  333-97367) of Everest Re Holdings,  Inc. of our report dated February
6, 2002 relating to the financial  statements and financial  statement schedules
of Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 20, 2003
**Exhibit
31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Albert
Figueroa, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Largo Vista
Group, Ltd.(this “Amendment”);
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this Amendment, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this Amendment;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to  the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
Amendment is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
Amendment (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c)
presented in this Amendment our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely  affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Amendment
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: May
11, 2005
 
 /s/Albert
Figueroa
 -------------------------------
 Albert
Figueroa
 Principal
Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4083 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4083

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and Conservation 
                    Act through September 30, 1997.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4083

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and Conservation 
                    Act through September 30, 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT AMENDMENTS.

    The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amended--
            (1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246) to read as 
        follows:

                   ``authorization of appropriations

    ``Sec. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 
1997 such sums as may be necessary to implement this part.'';
            (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking ``June 30, 
        1996'' both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof 
        ``September 30, 1997'';
            (3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42 U.S.C. 
        6276(h)) ``There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal 
        year 1997 such sums as may be necessary to carry out this 
        part.''; and
            (4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking ``June 30, 
        1996'' both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof 
        ``September 30, 1997''.

            Passed the House of Representatives 24, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Henry C. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 7478.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 17, 1938.

Thos. O. Marlar, of Toledo, Ohj.o, for petitioner.

James W. Morris, Sewall Key, and Herman Oliphant, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that, treating petitioner’s claims as claims for deductions from gross income because of “losses,” the petitioner has failed to carry the burden of proof that he sustained the losses or any portion thereof during the taxable years involved; and further, that treating the claims for deductions as “bad debts,” the petitioner has likewise failed to sustain the burden of proof that such claims or any portion thereof were ascertained to be worthless and were charged off within the taxable years involved, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.