alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3140 RONALD P. ALLY,

Petitioner,

v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in DA0831080497-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER The court treats the informal brief filed by the petitioner as a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The respondent should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT 

# MAY 2 2 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Date

cc: Ronald P. Ally Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo, Esq. Jan Horbaly Clerk

s8 MAY 2 2 2009 Jtsit tlOkorita CLERK
The State



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

Thursday, April 9, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00181

- CR

Michael A. RIVAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 04

- 10954

- CR The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The State’s brief was originally due December 31, 2014. On January 5, 2015, the State filed a motion to extend time to file its brief, asking for a ninety

- day extension. We granted the State’s motion, but advised the State that no further extensions would be granted absent written proof of extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly, the State’s brief was due March 31, 2015,

but it was not filed. On April 6, 2015, the cle rk’s office of this court called the State regarding

the status of the State’s brief. In response, the State filed a second motion for extension of time, asking for an additional thirty days to file its brief. After reviewing the motion, we find the Stat e has demonstrated extraordinary circumstances with regard to its second request for an extension

of time. Accordingly, we GRANT the State’s motion and ORDER the State to file its brief on

or before April 30, 2015

. THE STATE IS ADVISED THAT NO FURTHER EX TENSIONS

OF TIME TO FILE ITS BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of Ashraf M.Dahod and Paul J. Milbury hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President,Operations and Chief Financial Officer, respectively of Starent Networks, Corp.(the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 9, 2007 |       | By:        | ** ** | **/s/ Ashraf  M. Dahod**                                |
|----------------------|------------|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Ashraf  M. Dahod**                                         |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **President  and Chief Executive Officer**                   |
|                 |       |       |       |                                                         |
|                 |       |       |       |                                                         |
|                 |       |       |       |                                                         |
| Date: August 9, 2007 |       | By:        | ** ** | **/s/ Paul  J. Milbury**                                |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Paul J.  Milbury**                                         |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Vice  President, Operations and  Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 25, 2021

No. 04-21-00132-CV

BROOKS COUNTY, TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Maria Armandina BUENROSTRO,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-04-17973-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant, Brooks County, Texas’s brief was originally due May 25, 2021. On May 21, 

2021, appellant filed a motion requesting a twenty-day extension of time in which to file its 

brief. The motion is GRANTED and appellant’s brief is due no later than June 14, 2021.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of May, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1272

GINA OLWOCH,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 05-1898

GINA OLWOCH,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A72-727-129)

Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: February 16, 2006

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
- 2 -

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

No. 05-1272, Rachel S. Ullman, JOHNSON, YANG & ULLMAN, P.C.,

Wheaton, Maryland; No. 05-1898, Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON &

ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D.

Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright,

Assistant Director, Carol Federighi, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION

LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated petitions for review, Gina Olwoch,

a native and citizen of Uganda, petitions for review of two

separate orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”):

(1) affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s denial of

her application for cancellation of removal; and (2) denying her

motion to reopen immigration proceedings to apply for adjustment of

status.

Based on our review of the record, we find that

substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s finding that

Olwoch gave false testimony for the purpose of obtaining an

immigration benefit and is therefore statutorily barred from

establishing the requisite good moral character necessary for a

grant of cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(6) (2000)

(“No person shall be regarded as, or found to be, a person of good

moral character who, during the period for which good moral

character is required to be established, is, or was one who has

given false testimony for the purpose of obtaining any benefits

under this chapter.”); 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229b(b)(1) (West Supp. 2005)

(setting forth requirements for cancellation of removal for

nonpermanent residents). Contrary to Olwoch’s assertions, we find

no evidence to suggest that the immigration judge failed to make

the necessary findings regarding her subjective intent in
- 4 -

misrepresenting that she had no children. We therefore deny the

petition for review in No. 05-1272.

Additionally, our review of the record reveals that the

Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Olwoch’s motion to

reopen immigration proceedings. We therefore deny the petition for

review in No. 05-1898 for the reasons stated by the Board. See In

re: Olwoch, No. A72-727-129 (B.I.A. July 22, 2005).

Accordingly, we deny the petitions for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED
Opinion filed November 29, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

________________

Nos. 11-18-00296-CR & 11-18-00297-CR

________________

MARVIN THOMPSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court

Brown County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. CR25531 & CR25532

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss in both of his appeals. In each motion, 

he states that he no longer wishes to pursue the appeal and requests that the appeal 

be dismissed. In accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2, the motions are signed by

Appellant and his counsel. 

The motions are granted, and the appeals are dismissed.

November 29, 2018 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating. 

 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF
WILLIAM LINTON, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
CALL-NET ENTERPRISES INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 20-F (the Form 20-F)
for the period ended December 31, 2002 of Call-Net Enterprises Inc.

I, William Linton, the Chief Executive Officer of Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
certify that to the best of my knowledge:



|(i)  |  | the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78 o(d)), as amended; and  
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Call-Net Enterprises Inc.

Dated: May 15, 2003



| | /s/ Signed Bill Linton
Name: Bill Linton
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subscribed and sworn to before me this
15th day of May, 2003.



| | /s/ Janice Spencer
Name: Janice Spencer
Title:   Notary Public
| | --------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Call-Net Enterprises Inc. and will be retained by Call-Net and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             1,606,357
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2,189,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                         237,778
<INVENTORY>                                        1,680,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,267,570
<PP&E>                                             6,819,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2,263,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    13,289,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,224,790
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              64,501
<OTHER-SE>                                         9,884,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      13,289,560
<SALES>                                           23,101,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  23,101,704
<CGS>                                             15,525,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     15,525,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   5,966,902
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      60,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   126,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    1,482,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                          40,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,442,595
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 485 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 485

           To expand the authority for the export of devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 1995

  Mr. Kim (for himself, Mr. Moorhead, Mr. Royce, and Mrs. Seastrand) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Commerce and, in addition, to the Committee on International Relations, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To expand the authority for the export of devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of section 801(e)(2) of the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 381(e)(2)), on the 
basis of either of the following notices with respect to a medical 
device the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall make the 
determination in that section that the exportation of such medical 
device is not contrary to public health and safety and has the approval 
of the country to which it is intended for export:
            (1) Notice by the exporting company of approval for 
        marketing or for investigational use of the medical device in 
        the European Community (such approval for marketing referred to 
        as the ``CE'' mark).
            (2) Notice by the exporting company of approval for 
        marketing or investigational use of the medical device by the 
        Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan or by another 
        appropriate body in the government of Japan.
In the case of a medical device approved only for investigational use, 
this subsection shall not apply unless the initial destination country 
has also specifically approved such medical device for investigational 
use.
    (b) Application.--Subsection (a) does not apply to any medical 
device which has been banned by the Secretary of Health and Human 
Services under section 516 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(21 U.S.C. 360f).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 11.1 - Statement RE: Computation of Per Share Earnings
(000's omitted, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                             
                                                            Year ended April 30,
                                                   1997             1996             1995
                                                  -------          -------          -------            
 Primary:                                     
<S>                                            <C>              <C>              <C>
Average shares outstanding                        2,808.8          2,737.5          2,737.5

Net effect of dilutive stock                  
options and warrants - based on the
treasury stock method using average
market price                                        131.5              0.0             20.6
                                       
Total                                             2,940.3          2,737.5          2,758.1

Net income                                        3,255.1          2,366.8          1,890.6

Per share amount                                    $1.11            $0.86            $0.69

Fully diluted:
                                                           
Average shares outstanding                        2,808.8          2,737.5          2,737.5

Net effect of dilutive stock
options and warrants - based on the
treasury stock method using average
market price, if higher than average
market price                                        191.9             22.3             20.6
                                             
Total                                             3,000.7          2,759.8          2,758.1

Net Income                                        3,255.1          2,366.8          1,890.6

Per share amount                                    $1.08            $0.86            $0.69

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-98]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCAIDBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-98 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 5, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 47932)          ( print page 47933)          ( print page 47934)          ( print page 47935)          ( print page 47936)          ( print page 47937)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-18654 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5



Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
This Amendment No. 1to Third Amended And Restated Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is effective as of January 1, 2020 (“Effective Date”) by and between Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, a Maryland corporation (“Corporation”), and Todd J. Meredith (“Officer”).
Recitals
Whereas, the Corporation has heretofore employed the Officer as its President and Chief Executive Officer under the terms of an employment agreement dated February 16, 2016 (the “Employment Agreement”); and
Whereas, the parties desire to modify the Employment Agreement with this amendment; 
Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby affirmed, the parties hereto agree to the following to amend the Employment Agreement as of the Effective Date:


1.    Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in its place:
3.1    Base Salary. As payment for the services to be rendered by Officer as provided in Section 1 and subject to the terms and conditions of Section 2, Corporation agrees to pay to Officer a “Base Salary” at the rate of $800,000 per annum payable in equal semi-monthly installments, or in such other periodic installments as mutually agreed to by Corporation and Officer. 
2.    This Amendment represents the entire understanding among the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and, as of the Effective Date, this Amendment supersedes any and all prior understandings, agreements, plans and negotiations, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter hereof. All modifications to the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, must be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such modification is sought. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement remains unaltered and in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 


[Execution Page Follows]






Exhibit 10.5



EXECUTION PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the 12th day of February, to be effective as of the Effective Date.
Corporation:
Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated


                               	
		
	By:
	/s/ John M. Bryant, Jr.

	Name:
	John M. Bryant, Jr.

	Title:
	Executive Vice President and General Counsel








Officer:
	
	
	/s/ Todd J. Meredith

	Todd J. Meredith