alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Foreign Claims Settlement Commission 

          - [F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 7-08] 

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters specified, as follows: 

*Date and Time:*                     Thursday, August 21, 2008, at 10:30 a.m.                 

*Subject Matter:*                     Issuance of Proposed Decisions, Amended Proposed Decisions, and Orders in claims against Albania.                 

*Status:*                     Open.                 

All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-6988. 

Mauricio J. Tamargo, 

Chairman.

 [FR Doc. E8-18601 Filed 8-7-08; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Auduon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Arkson
Nutraceuticals, Inc.


Date: 11/12/08                          By: /s/ Robert Auduon
                                           -------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Robert Auduon
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

January 2, 2018

ERRATUM

______________________ 

Appeal Nos. 2017-1499, 2017-1500, 2017-1558, 2017-1559

ALLERGAN SALES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

SANDOZ, INC., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., 

ALCON RESEARCH, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellants

Decided: December 22, 2017 

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change: 

On page 8, line 34, replace “titrate” with “tartrate.”
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132247 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, SHARON ROBERTSON, personal Justices 

representative of the Estate of GORDON

ROBERTSON, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132247 

 COA: 269752 
 Bay CC: 05-003647-NH

S.M. ASCHERL, M.D., BAY

RADIOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS, P.C., 

and BAY MEDICAL CENTER, a/k/a BAY 

REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the order of the Court of Appeals, which ordered 

dismissal of the complaint with prejudice, and we REMAND this case to the Bay Circuit 

Court for entry of an order dismissing the complaint without prejudice. See Kirkaldy v 

Rim, 478 Mich 581 (2007). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we 

are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this 

Court. 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 Exhibit 21.4


                      SUBSIDIARIES OF CROWN NORTHCORP, INC.
                      ------------------------------------

Crown Revenue Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown NorthCorp, Inc.

Crown Properties, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown Revenue Services, Inc.

CNC Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown
NorthCorp, Inc.

Eastern Realty, L.L.C., a Virginia limited company, with 99% of the membership
interests owned by CNC Holding Corp., and 1% owned by Crown Revenue Services,
Inc.

Eastern Realty Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of CNC Holding Corp.

Eastern Baltimore, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
CNC Holding Corp.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 492 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 492

 To impose a tax and import controls on bullets expressly designed to 
         penetrate law enforcement personnel bulletproof vests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 1995

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose a tax and import controls on bullets expressly designed to 
         penetrate law enforcement personnel bulletproof vests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AMEND 26 U.S.C. 5821 AND 5844.

    Amend 26 U.S.C. 5821 and 5844 to insert after the word ``firearm'' 
each place it occurs the phrase ``and ammunition designed to penetrate 
bulletproof vests''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    Amend 26 U.S.C. 5845 as follows:
            ``(n) Ammunition designed to penetrate bulletproof vests.--
        The term `ammunition designed to penetrate bulletproof vests' 
        is ammunition, of any design or material, which the Secretary 
        determines is expressly manufac-turered or advertised to 
        penetrate normal quality bulletproof vests worn by law 
        enforcement personnel.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The tax imposed by this Act is effective Janaury 11, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
## United States Court of App eals
F O R T H E E I G H T H C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 0- 22 84

__ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca, *
* Pl ai nt iff - App el le e, * App eal fro m th e Uni te d S ta te s * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e v. * Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa

. * Ch arl es Earl Wrig ht , * [UNPUBLISHED]
* Defen da nt - App el la nt

. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 15 , 20 11 Fil ed : Ma rch 21 , 20 11

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re LOKEN, MELLOY , and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Ch arl es Earl W rig ht was ch arg ed in a fo ur -co un t in di ct m en t wit h di st rib ut in g
an d po ss es si ng wit h i nt en t t o d is tri bu te co cai ne ba se (cra ck co cai ne ) in th e su m m er
an d fal l of 20 06

. He pl ead ed gu il ty to co un t 4, po ss es s i o n wit h in te nt to di st rib ut e 13 4.5 9 gr am s of co cai ne ba se , an d th e go ve rn m en t di sm is se d th ree ot he r co un ts ch arg in g di st rib ut io n of le ss er qu an ti ti es

. At th e May 2 0 10 se nt en ci ng , th e di st ric t

co ur t de te rm in ed an ad vi so ry gu id el in es se nt en ci ng ran ge of 12 1- 15 1 m on t h s in 1
pr is on , gr an te d W rig ht ’s m ot io n fo r a on e-m on th do wnwar d va ria nc e ba se d up on hi s

The Hon or ab le Lin da R. Rea d e, Ch ie f Ju dg e of th e Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct 1 Co ur t fo r th e Nor th ern Dis tri ct of I owa

.fav or ab le po st -o ffen se co nd uc t pr io r to th e Decem be r 20 09 in di ct m en t, an d im po se d th e 12 0- m on th m in im

um se nt en ce m an da te d by 21 U.S.C. § 84 1( b) (1 )(A)(i ii ) (2 00 6)

. W rig ht fil ed a ti m el y

no ti ce o f ap pe al

.

W it h th e ap pe al pe nd in g , C o n g r e ss en act ed th e Fai r Sen te nc in g Act of 20 10 (FSA), whi ch in crea se d th e am ou nt of crac k ne ces sa ry to tri gg er a m an da to ry te n- y ear
se nt en ce fro m 50 to 28 0 gr am s. Pu b. L. No. 11 1- 22 0, § 2( a)(1 ), 12 4 St at

. 23 72 (Au g. 3, 20 10 ), co di fie d at 21 U.S

. C

. § 84 1( b) (1 )(A)(i ii ). W rig ht arg ue s th at th e FSA sh ou ld ap pl y to cas es pe nd in g on ap pe al whe n it was en act ed be cau se th a t is th e

“ ge ne ral rul e” an d i s co ns is te nt wit h th e FSA’s st at ed pu rp os e, “ To re st or e fai rn es s to Fed eral co cai ne sen te nc in g.” Howev er, t he co nt en ti on is co nt rary t o th is co ur t’s pr io r de ci si on s co nc lu di ng th at Co ng res s di d no t “ ex pr es sl y pr ov id e” th at th e FSA’s

ame n d e d cri m in al pe na lt ie s are ex em pt fro m th e ge ne ral sa vi ng s st at ut e, 1 U.S.C. § 10 9. Uni te d St at es v. Sm it h, 20 11 W L 28 50 56 , at *3 -4 (8 th Ci r. Ja n. 31 , 20 11 ). As th es e de ci si on s are con tro ll in g, th e jud gm en t of the di st ric t cou rt m us t be affi rm ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GBM ENTERPRISES L.L.C., Case No. 09-CV-12250

Plaintiff, Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

v.

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER SATISFYING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The court issued an order to show cause on July 23, 2009, requesting that Defendant

demonstrate diversity jurisdiction in order to avoid remand to state court. Defendant filed a

response on July 29, 2009, stating that the Plaintiff limited liability company is a citizen of

Michigan. Defendant is a citizen of Illinois and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 

Based upon these facts, the court concludes that subject matter jurisdiction is properly alleged

and that the court’s order to show cause has been satisfied.

SO ORDERED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara

United States District Judge

Date: August 13, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date,

August 13, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager

5:09-cv-12250-JCO-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 08/13/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 94
#### In the Matter of the Petition of CLYDE-MALLORY LINES, as Owner of Steamship BRAZOS, for Limitation of Liability. Clyde-Mallory, Owner of Steamship The Brazos, Petitioner-Appellee; United States of America, Claimant-Appellant.

No. 197.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 21, 1938.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (William E. Collins, Sp. Asst, to U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Bhrlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Eugene Underwood, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTÓN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 2, 2020

No. 04-20-00132-CV

ESCONDIDO RESOURCES II, LLC,

Appellant

v.

LAS TINAJAS MINERALS, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CVI-000015-D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

Appellant’s unopposed motion to extend time to file the reply brief is granted. We order 

appellant’s reply brief is due November 16, 2020.

It is so ORDERED on this 2nd day of November, 2020.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: ______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
[Cite as Davis v. Summit Cty. Common Pleas Court , 2019-Ohio-3869.]

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

TRAVONTE DAVIS

Petitioner

v. SUMMIT COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT Respondent C.A. No. 29533

ORIGINAL ACTION IN HABEAS CORPUS

Dated: September 25, 2019

PER CURIAM. {¶1} Travonte Davis has attempted to petition this Court for a writ of habeas corpus to order his release from custody. 

### Because Mr. Davis has not complied with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, this Court must dismiss the petition. {¶2} 

### Mr. Davis completed a form titled “PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY.” He completed the 15-page form and filed it with the Summit County Clerk of Courts. On the form, he identified himself as the petitioner, but failed to indicate a respondent in the caption. He indicated in the body of the petition, however, that he challenged the judgment of the Summit County Common Pleas Court. {¶3} 

### In addition to other defects with his petition, Mr. Davis failed to comply with the statutory filing mandate that requires this Court to dismiss this case. R.C. 2969.25 sets forth specific filing requirements for inmates who file a civil action againstC.A. No. 29533 Page 2 of 3 

### a government employee or entity. As noted above, Mr. Davis identified the Summit County Court of Common Pleas on the cover of his petition, without identifying any other respondent; the court of common pleas is a government entity. Mr. Davis, incarcerated in the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, is an inmate. R.C. 2969.21(C) and (D). A case must be dismissed if an inmate fails to comply with the mandatory requirements of

R.C. 2969.25 in the commencement of the action. State ex rel. Graham v. Findlay Mun.

Court , 106 Ohio St.3d 63, 2005-Ohio-3671, ¶ 6 (“The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate’s action to dismissal.”). {¶4} 

### Mr. Davis did not pay the cost deposit required by this Court’s Local Rules. He also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C), which sets forth specific requirements for an inmate who seeks to proceed without paying the cost deposit. Mr. Davis did not file an affidavit of indigency and he did not file a statement of his prisoner trust account that sets forth the balance in his inmate account for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier. {¶5} 

### Because Mr. Davis did not comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25, the case is dismissed. Costs taxed to Mr. Davis. {¶6} 

### The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58.

THOMAS A. TEODOSIO FOR THE COURT CARR, J. HENSAL, J.C.A. No. 29533 Page 3 of 3 CONCUR.

APPEARANCES: TRAVONTE DAVIS, Pro se, Petitioner.
#### Quimby et al. v. Boyd et al.

*Appeal from District Court of El Paso County.*

Petition for rehearing.

Pee Cueiam.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing of this cause, and the points urged in the oral arguments thereon., the court is of opinion that the application should be denied.

As stated in the opinion, the only question about which we entertained any doubt was the sufficiency of the testimony to support the verdict of the jury as to the performance of the annual .labor required by law, for the year 1880, and we are still of opinion, in view of the whole testimony and the repeated verdicts for the plaint*343iffs, that we would not be warranted in reversing the cause upon that ground.

While the testimony of the plaintiffs below was mainly directed to the point that the price paid for the work performed was a reasonable price for work of that character and extent, when done on contract, yet there was some evidence tending to show its actual value, and that it came up to the legal standard.

We are still of opinion that there is no force in the objection urged against the validity of the location of the Paymaster claim.

*Rehearing denied.*
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 5203

_____________________________
N ATHANIEL W ILBANKS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. John C. Cooper , Judge

. June 4, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. R OWE , M AKAR , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Nathaniel Wilbanks, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### Mr. and Mrs. F. LAMBERT, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Joseph CARUSO, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 14571.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 29, 1933.

James J. Landry and I. E. U-zzo, both of New Orleans, for appellants.

J. K. Gaudet, of Gretna, for appellee.

WESTEREIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by Mr. and Mrs. Frasiene Lambert, in which it is alleged that on the 11th day of November, 1931, at about 6:30 p. m., a collision occurred on the public highway near the town' of Harahan between a Ford roadster, in which plaintiffs were traveling in the direction of the city of New Orleans, and a truck operated by defendant, Joseph Caruso, which was going in the opposite direction, with the result that both plaintiffs sustained physical injuries for which Mrs. Lambert claims $4,548 and Mr. Lambert $5,016 as damages.

The defendant is alleged to have been negligent in that his truck was being operated at an excessive rate of speed and on the wrong side of the road, causing the plaintiff, Frasi-ene Lambert, to drive to the extreme right of the road in an effort to avoid the accident.

On behalf of defendant it is contended that plaintiffs were driving in a zigzag manner from one side of the road to the other, and that the difficulty of determining Mr. Lambert’s course was responsible for the collision. He reconvened, claiming $113.25 as damages to his truck.

There were only three eyewitnesses, the plaintiff and his wife and the defendant. Their testimony is, as might be expected, wholly irreconcilable. The learned judge below believed the defendant and resolved the doubt created by the conflicting evidence in his favor, giving judgment accordingly, and we are unable to say that in doing so he committed manifest error. The case appears to us as one peculiarly within the oft-stated doctrine to the effect that the judgment of the trial court on a question of fact will not be disturbed unless palpably erroneous.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Largo Vista Group, Ltd (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, Deng Shan,
      Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
      knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      May
      15, 2006





/s/
      Deng Shan


Deng
      Shan, Principal Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 10, 2016

NO. 03-16-00008-CV

Crystal International, Inc. d/b/a/ Fuel Stop, Appellant

v.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on January 14, 2016.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory order.

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Exhibit 99.1

Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Samsonite
Corporation (the "Company") for the annual period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Luc Van Nevel, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard H. Wiley, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|By | /s/LUC VAN NEVEL    |                                                  | 
|-- | ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|   | Name:               | Luc Van Nevel                                    | 
|   | Title               | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director  | 
|   | Date:               | May 30, 2003                                     | 
|By | /s/RICHARD H. WILEY |                                                  | 
|   | Name:               | Richard H. Wiley                                 | 
|   | Title               | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | 
|   | Date:               | May 30, 2003                                     | 



QuickLinks