alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18356]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Newark Liberty International Airport Slots; Request for Bids

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA plans to auction a lease for a package of slots at 
Newark Liberty International Airport on September 3, 2008. If you are 
interested in participating in the auction, commenting on the planned 
auction procedures or draft lease terms, you will be able to find 
additional information and procedures for providing comments at http://faaco.faa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Wharff, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Office of Aviation Policy and Plans, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202 267-3274; His e-mail 
is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fbb19e9d9d899e82d5ac939a899d9dbbbdbabad59c948d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="db91bebdbda9bea2f58cb3baa9bdbd9b9d9a9af5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2008.
Nan Shellabarger,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Policy, Planning, and 
Environment.
[FR Doc. E8-18356 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|                                                                                                                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  /s/      Kevin L. Foxx                                                                                                                                            |
| Kevin      L. Foxx                                                                                                                                                      |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer ofSemGroup      Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,general partner of SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P. |
|                                                                                                                                                                    |

|                                                                                                                                                                    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/      Alex G. Stallings                                                                                                                                              |
| Alex      G. Stallings                                                                                                                                                  |
| Chief      Financial Officer and Secretary ofSemGroup      Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,general partner of SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P. |
176 La. 849

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur CAPPS.

No. 32225.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1933.

Rehearing Denied March 27, 1933.

C. H. McCain, of Colfax, for appellant.

Gaston L. Porterie, Atty. Gen., James O’Connor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry Fuller, Dist. Atty., of Winnfield (James O’Niell, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., of counsel), for the State.

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The defendant has appealed from a conviction and sentence for violation of the prohibition law, known as the Hood Act, being Act No. 39 of 1921 (Ex. Sess.), as amended by Act No.'57 of 1924. After conviction, and before sentence, he filed a motion in arrest of judgment, contending that the Hood Act was repealed by Act No. 238 of 1932. The district attorney then pleaded that the act of 1932 was unconstitutional. The district judge overruled the motion in arrest of judgment, on the ground that Act No. 238 of 1932 'was unconstitutional.

We decided to-day, in State v. Herbert Watkins (La. Sup.) 147 So. 8, that Act No. 238 of 1932 was unconstitutional and that the Hood Act was therefore yet in effect.

For the reasons given in that case, the conviction and sentence áre affirmed.

ST. PAUL, J., absent on account of illness, takes no part.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FELIX WALLS,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERIC HOLDER, ET. AL,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-13006

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S PETITIONS

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District

of Michigan, on October 13, 2009.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 1361 on July 29, 2009. Petitioner neither paid the filing fee for a civil

action ($350.00) nor applied in the manner required by law to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Therefore, on August 25, 2009, this Court issued an Order of Deficiency for Prisoner

Civil Action, directing Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file the documents required under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs within thirty (30)

days from the date of the order.

As of this date, Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted the necessary

documentation to apply to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs. Plaintiff did

2:09-cv-13006-PJD-CEB Doc # 6 Filed 10/13/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 30
file a “First Amendment Petition” and “Motion to Serve Judicial Notice” on September

10, 2009. Neither submission, however, addresses the Court’s Order of Deficiency or

provides the information required under § 1915(a)(2). As Plaintiff was informed in the

Order of the Court’s requirements, the Court is therefore presuming he is not proceeding

in forma pauperis, is assessing the entire filing fee, and is ordering the case dismissed for

want of prosecution.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and First

Amendment Petition are DISMISSED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copy to:

Felix Walls, #02414-112

FCI Oxford

Federal Correctional Institution

P.O. Box 1000

Oxford, WI 53952

2:09-cv-13006-PJD-CEB Doc # 6 Filed 10/13/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 31
#### Harry E. MOYSES and Abe J. Warsaw, Appellants, v. BUCKEYE RELINER PRODUCING COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 7449.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 10, 1938.

Ely & Barrow, of Akron, Ohio, for appellants.

Kent W. Hughes, of Lima, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered and adjudged that the decree appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge filed November 29, 193S.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2014

NO. 03-12-00733-CV

Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant

v.

Paul Flanagan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 24, 2012. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders 

judgment affirming the ALJ’s decision authorizing the suspension of Flanagan’s driver’s license. 

The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

        Eachof Ashraf M. Dahod and Paul J. Milbury hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, inhis capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President,Operations and Chief Financial Officer, respectively of Starent Networks, Corp.(the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|                         | By:    | /s/  ASHRAF M. DAHOD        |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date:  November 7, 2008 |   | Ashraf M. Dahod                       |
|                         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                                  |
|                         |   |                                  |
| Date:  November 7, 2008 |   |                                  |
|                         | By:    | /s/  PAUL J. MILBURY        |
|                         |   | Paul J. Milbury                       |
|                         |   | Vice President, Operations and        |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.447 Filed 05/20/10 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.448 Filed 05/20/10 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.449 Filed 05/20/10 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.450 Filed 05/20/10 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.451 Filed 05/20/10 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.452 Filed 05/20/10 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.453 Filed 05/20/10 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.454 Filed 05/20/10 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.455 Filed 05/20/10 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:09-cr-20295-MOB-RSW ECF No. 88, PageID.456 Filed 05/20/10 Page 10 of 10
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-08-023]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: August 12, 2008 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-452 and 731-TA-1129-1130 (Final)(Raw Flexible 
Magnets from China and Taiwan)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' 
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before August 25, 2008.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: (1) Document No. GC-08-147: Final 
disposition of Inv. No. 337-TA-487 (Certain Agricultural Vehicles and 
Components Thereof).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 5, 2008.

William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E8-18327 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 13.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.  §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Migenix Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. DeMesa, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









James DeMesa

James M. DeMesa

President and Chief Executive Officer

July 31, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than February 15, 2008.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas**                     (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:                

*1. Glover Loftin*, to acquire voting shares of Capital Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Commercial Capital Bank, all of Delhi, Louisiana.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 28, 2008.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E8-1817 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
----

----

|   | (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      14, 2009 | /s/      Richard Ivanovick   |
|-------------------|------------------------------|
|              | Richard      Ivanovick       |
|              | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hong Zhao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:           August 13, 2010
/s/  Hong ZhaoBy:  Hong ZhaoIts:  Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                         SIGMATRON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
             PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT AND
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

      I, Linda K. Blake, am Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of
SigmaTron International, Inc. (the "Company").

      This certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") and 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
connection with the filing of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended April 30, 2005 (the "Report").

      I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

      (a)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78 m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: July 27, 2005

                                      /s/ Linda K. Blake
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Linda K. Blake
                                      Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
                                      Treasurer of SigmaTron International, Inc.
#### ESTATE of Kenneth W. DAVIS, Deceased, et al., etc., Petitioners-Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 72-1870.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Scott P. Crampton, Bobby D. Burns, Asst. Attys. Gen., Meyer Rothwaeks, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Lee H. Henkel, Jr., Acting Chief Counsel, Donald H. Olson, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellant.

Whitfield J. Collins, Allan Howeth, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioners-appel-lees.

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the United States Tax Court, Estate of Davis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C.Memo. 1971-318 (1971), insofar as that opinion disposes of the Commissioner’s contention that this transaction was part gift, part sale.

Affirmed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00734

- CR

Joshua James Ozuna

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the County Court at Law of Kerr County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR14

- 0258

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 1 7 , 2015
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                      List of Subsidiary Corporations

Anchor Coin
Anchor Gaming Canada, Inc.
C.G. Investments, Inc.
Colorado Grande Enterprises, Inc. (1)
DD Stud, Inc.
Green Mountain Entertainment, Inc.
Powerhouse Technologies, Inc.
Automated Wagering International, Inc. (2)
Raven's D&R Music, Inc. (2)
United Wagering Systems, Inc. (2)
VLC, Inc. (2)
VLC of Nevada, Inc. (2)
VLT Company, Inc. (2)
Neuvo Sol Turf Club, Inc. (3)
United Tote Company (3)
United Tote Canada, Inc. (3)
Dynatote of Pennsylvania, Inc. (4)



(1)   Colorado Grande Enterprises, Inc. is 80% controlled by Anchor Gaming.
      Approximately 50% of this subsidiary is held through C.G. Investments,
      Inc. and the remaining 30% is held by Anchor Gaming.
(2)   A 100% subsidiary of Powerhouse Technologies, Inc.
(3)   A 100% subsidiary of United Wagering Systems, Inc.
(4)   A 100% subsidiary of United Tote Company
#### SHREVEPORT LAUNDRIES, Inc., v. TEAGLE. SAME v. CONNELL.

Nos. 4061, 4169.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1932.

For former opinion, see 139 So. 563.

Blanchard, Goldstein, Walker & O’Quin, of Shreveport, for plaintiff.

Clifton F. Davis, of Shreveport, for appel-lee Teagle.

Barksdale, Bullock, Warren, Clark & Van Hook, of Shreveport, for appellant Connell.

PALMER, J.

These eases are before us on rehearing. The original opinion of this court is reported in 139 So. 563.

Clearly. these cases now, and at the time of rehearing, present only moot questions. While we have the authority to pass on moot questions, yet in view of the importance of the issues presented, since a majority of the members of this court will retire from the court within a few weeks, we deem it best to dismiss the cases and leave the parties, and the questions involved, in the same position as occupied at the time of filing the suits.

Accordingly, these two cases are dismissed on the ground that they present only moot questions.