Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Patent and Trademark Office 

          - [Docket No.: PTO-P-2008-0035] 

# AGENCY:

United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is publishing this notice to clarify which patent-related regulations are currently in effect. The USPTO is identifying the applicability date of those regulatory provisions relating to applications containing patentably indistinct claims which are enjoined in                         *Tafas*                         v.                         *Dudas*, 530 F. Supp. 2d 786 (E.D. Va. 2008). Should the injunction be lifted, those regulations will apply only to applications filed on or after any new effective date that would be published by the USPTO in the future.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         August 7, 2008.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Office of Patent Legal Administration, by telephone at (571) 272-7704, or by e-mail at                         *PatentPractice@uspto.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule revising the rules of practice in patent cases in title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) relating to continuing applications and requests for continued examination practices, and for the examination of claims in patent applications.                     *See Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications,*72 FR 46716 (Aug. 21, 2007), 1322                     *Off. Gaz. Pat. Office*                     76 (Sept. 11, 2007) (Claims and Continuations Final Rule).                 

The Claims and Continuations Final Rule amended existing 37 CFR 1.17(f), 1.26(a) and (b), 1.52(d)(2), 1.53(b) and (c)(4), 1.75(b) and (c), 1.76(b)(5), 1.78, 1.104(a)(1) and (b), 1.110, 1.114(a) and (d), 1.136(a)(1), 1.142(a), 1.145, and 1.495(g), and added new 37 CFR 1.105(a)(1)(ix), 1.114(f), (g), and (h), 1.117, 1.142(c), 1.265, and 1.704(c)(11). 

With respect to 37 CFR 1.704(c)(11), the Claims and Continuations Final Rule redesignated existing 37 CFR 1.704(c)(11) as 37 CFR 1.704(c)(12) and added a new 37 CFR 1.704(c)(11). 

                    The changes in the Claims and Continuations Final Rule were permanently enjoined by the district court in                     *Tafas*                     v.                     *Dudas*, 530 F. Supp. 2d 786 (E.D. Va. 2008). That decision is currently on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.                 

                    The provisions of 37 CFR 1.17(f), 1.26(a) and (b), 1.52(d)(2), 1.53(b) and (c)(4), 1.75(b) and (c), 1.76(b)(5), 1.78, 1.104(a)(1) and (b), 1.110, 1.114(a) and (d), 1.136(a)(1), 1.142(a), 1.145, 1.495(g), and 1.704(c)(11) in effect as of August 7, 2008 are the provisions of 37 CFR 1.17(f), 1.26(a) and (b), 1.52(d)(2), 1.53(b) and (c)(4), 1.75(b) and (c), 1.76(b)(5), 1.78, 1.104(a)(1) and (b), 1.110, 1.114(a) and (d), 1.136(a)(1), 1.142(a), 1.145, 1.495(g), and 1.704(c)(11) in effect on October 31, 2007, and may be found in the July 2007                           ( print page 46000)                        Revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.                 

The provisions 37 CFR 1.105(a)(1)(ix), 1.114(f), (g), and (h), 1.117, 1.142(c), 1.265, and 1.704(c)(11) as added by the Claims and Continuations Final Rule are not in effect as of August 7, 2008. 

                    The USPTO anticipates that it will be some time before the litigation concerning the Claims and Continuations Final Rule is finally resolved. The USPTO is concerned that some applicants may be taking preparatory action anticipating the new requirements of 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1) and (2), as added by the Claims and Continuations Final Rule, due to the possibility that the injunction by the district court in                     *Tafas*                     will be removed. The purpose of this notice is to aid applicants who might otherwise feel the need to take such preparatory actions by identifying the applicability date of the provisions of 37 CFR 1.78(f) in the event that the injunction by the district court in                     *Tafas*                     is removed. Specifically, the changes in 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1) and (f)(2) will only apply to applications filed on or after any new effective date that would be published by the USPTO after the removal of the injunction. Thus, in the event the referenced injunction is lifted, applicants will only need to comply with the identification requirements of 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1) in applications having an actual filing date on or after this new effective date. Likewise applicants will only have to identify other commonly owned applications that satisfy the conditions set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1)(i) in applications that have a filing date on or after this new effective date. Similarly, the rebuttable presumption of 37 CFR 1.78(f)(2) will only apply to applications having an actual filing date on or after the effective date. Furthermore, the rebuttable presumption will only exist with respect to an application that satisfies the conditions set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(f)(2)(i) and also has a filing date on or after this new effective date.                 

Dated: August 1, 2008. 

Jon W. Dudas, 

Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

 [FR Doc. E8-18224 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-16-P