alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Exhibit 8

Set forth below is a table
listing the Companys significant subsidiaries:

|Name of Company                             | Country of Incorporation | % ofOwnership*
|------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------------
|Aberdeen Management Limited                 | Channel Islands          | 100%          
|Island Hotel Company Limited                | The Bahamas              | (1)           
|Paradise Beach Inn, Limited                 | The Bahamas              | (4)           
|Paradise Enterprises Limited                | The Bahamas              | (1)           
|Paradise Island Limited                     | The Bahamas              | (1)           
|PIV, Inc.                                   | United States            | (3)           
|Purposeful BV                               | Netherlands              | (5)           
|Sun Cove Limited                            | United States            | (2)           
|Sun Cove New York, Inc.                     | United States            | (2)           
|Sun Hotels International (Bermuda), Limited | Bermuda                  | 100%          
|Sun Hotels International Management NV      | N. Antilles              | 100%          
|Sun International Bahamas, Limited          | The Bahamas              | 100%          
|Sun International Development Limited       | The Bahamas              | (1)           
|Sun International Management Ltd.           | British Virgin Islands   | 100%          
|Sun International Management (UK) Ltd.      | United Kingdom           | 100%          
|Sun International Marketing, Inc.           | United States            | (2)           
|Sun International New York, Inc.            | United States            | (2)           
|Sun International North America, Inc.       | United States            | 100%          
|Sun International Resorts, Inc.             | United States            | (2)           
|Sun Vacances SA                             | France                   | (6)           
|Sunonline Limited                           | The Bahamas              | 100%          

* % Voting Power equals % of Ownership
(1)  100% owned by Sun International Bahamas, Limited
(2)  100% owned by Sun International North America, Inc.
(3)  100% owned by Sun International Resorts, Inc.
(4)  100% owned by Paradise Island Ltd.
(5)  100% owned by Sun Hotels International Management NV
(6)  100% owned by Purposeful BV
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Joseph J. Bouffard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 31, 2008



/s/ Joseph J. BouffardJoseph J. BouffardPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program Survey 
for Stranding Network Participants.
    OMB Control Number: None.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 294.
    Number of Respondents: 294.
    Average Hours per Response: 1.
    Needs and Uses: The National Marine Fisheries Service's (NMFS) 
Marine Mammal Health and Stranding Response Program will conduct 
program evaluations of the six NMFS regional stranding networks: 
Northeast, Southeast, Southwest, Northwest, Alaska, and Pacific Islands 
Regions. A survey will be used to gather data from a cross-section of 
stranding network participants in each region. The data will be 
collected regarding performance, organizational structure, objectives, 
and needs of the program. The information will be used to prioritize 
and discuss issues of concern and assist with future program management 
and planning.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: One-time only.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deba96a7b0bbb59ebab1bdf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1b3706111a143f1b101c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a0e2b3c232e151825393e212f380a252728642f253a642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="367257405f5269645945425d534476595b541853594618515940">[email protected]</span></a> .

    Dated: August 7, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-18552 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Abatement Order filed December 5, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00608

- CV

____________ MOMENTUM CONTRACTORS , INC., FREDERICK AL LEN, JR. & JUDY ALLEN , Appellant s
V.

TRI

- TEMP REFRIGERATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 19727



### ABATEMENT ORDER
Notice was filed on November 19, 2013 that appellant s Frederick Allen and Judy Allen are in bankruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on November 19, 2013
, Frederick Allen and Judy Allen petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court under case number
1 3

- 37143

- H5

- 7 . A bankruptcy s uspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal inaccordance with federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the

appeal abated.
When a case has been suspended by a bankru ptcy filing, a party may move the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).
For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdictio n, the appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

          In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Stratasys, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert F. Gallagher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

          (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: March   14, 2006 | /s/ ROBERT F. GALLAGHER   |
|------------------------|---------------------------|
|                   |                           |
|                   | Robert F.   Gallagher     |
|                   | Chief   Financial Officer |
#### Milford C. Berner and Chicago Title & Trust Company, as Trustee Under Trust No. 40669, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Village of Northbrook, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 50,552. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, First Division.

October 17, 1966.

Rehearing denied December 5, 1966.

Maurice J. Nathanson, of Chicago (Marvin J. Glink, of counsel), for appellants; Frederic O. Floberg, of Chicago (H. Arvid Johnson, Ross, Hardies, O’Keefe, Babcock, McDugald & Parsons, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by JUSTICE MURPHY. Not to be published in full.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

BRIAN EVAN ROTH,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-2448

LT Case No. 2016-CF-036747-A

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed November 15, 2022 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County, 

Steve Henderson, Judge. 

Michael Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman 

Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00018

- CV

BILLY JOE AKI NS, DAVID AKINS, MAR ILYN AKINS,

AND CHAPARRAL INSULA TION, INC. D/B/A

CHAPARRAL MOTORS AND LOCHRIDGE

- PRIEST, INC.

, Appellant s

v.

PJC LOGISTICS, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND

DERIVATIVELY ON BEHA LF OF LOCHRIDGE

- PRIEST, INC.

, Appellee s

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 3463

- 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Billy Joe Akins, David Akins, Marilyn Akins, and Chaparral

Insulation, Inc., and Lochridge

- Priest, Inc.,, and Appellees PJC Logistics, LLC,

Individually and Derivatively on behalf of Lochridge

- Priest, Inc. filed a join t motion to

dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2 ). The parties indicate that they have

reached a comprehensive se ttlement of their disputes. Dismissal of this appeal wouldAkins v. PJC Logistics, LLC Page 2

not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. The

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Scoggins, and

Judge Martha J. Trudo 1

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 11, 2015

[CV06]

1 The Honorable Martha J. Trudo , Judge of the 264th District Court, sitting by assignment of the Chief

Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 74.003(a) (West 2013).
#### JOHNSON v. BUTTERWORTH.*

No. 14539.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

March 12, 1934.

For former opinion, see 152 So. 166.

Jas. G. Sehillin, of New Orleans, for petitioner.

*

Writ of certiorari granted April 23, 1934.

PER CURIAM.

We have given consideration to the arguments advanced in a brief in support of application for rehearing. So far as the defense of assumption .of risk is concerned, it may be that we were in error in resorting solely to rather limited experience which we have had with very young children and in concluding from that experience that children of tender age are not customarily addicted to the habit of biting.

If it is the customary thing for such children to bite those who have charge of them, then the danger of being injured in this manner is a risk which a nurse may be said to assume when she accepts employment.

Whether such children customarily bite is a question of fact on which our present opinion would readily yield to proof, if, when the matter is tried below on the merits, the preponderance of the evidence establishes that such habits are customary and usual.

In our decree we remanded the case for trial on the merits, and there is therefore no necessity to recall or to amend that decree.

The rehearing requested is refused.

Rehearing refused.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY J. BANNIGER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 359 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 1 Filed 08/18/2009 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 1 Filed 08/18/2009 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 1 Filed 08/18/2009 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 1 Filed 08/18/2009 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 1 Filed 08/18/2009 Page 5 of 5
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Samuel CRUMP, Defendant-Appellant. Samuel CRUMP, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

Nos. 68239, 70296.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 29, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Defendant-Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for one count of second-degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender, § 558.016, to fifteen years’ imprisonment, to run concurrently with the sentence in an unrelated case. Defendant alleges the trial court erred when it did not grant a mistrial *877
      *sua sponte*during closing argument after a personal attack by the prosecutor on Defendant’s attorney. Defendant also alleges error in the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without a hearing. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum outlining the reasons for this order affirming the judgments of the trial and motion courts. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
#### Joseph Biehl, Appellant, v. Erie Railroad Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed on argument, with ten dollars costs and disbursements: Woodward,, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### COLLINS v. DENNIS SHEEN TRANSFER CO., Inc.

No. 14359.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Dec. 19, 1932.

Johnston Armstrong, of New Orleans, for appellant.

P. M. Milner, of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

JANVIER, J.

Plaintiff, a young colored laborer, received physical injuries in an automobile accident, and, claiming that the amount awarded him by the district court, $100, is inadequate, he has appealed from the judgment of that court.

Defendant’s counsel concedes that his client is liable for such damage as plaintiff sustained, but maintains that the injuries were trivial and that the amount allowed was ample remuneration therefor.

Plaintiff’s doctor (whose bill was $18) described the injuries as follows: “A cut over the left eye and injury to the left hand and a badly bruised leg.”

Plaintiff himself says that his fingers were bruised, his lip cut; that there was a cut over his eye which required one suture; and that his leg was bruised and received severe brush burns. He also claims that he was disabled and could do no work at all for a period of two months.

We do not believe that the injuries sustained would incapacitate a healthy young negro for any appreciable length of time, nevertheless, the photographs show a rather severe scraping of the left leg and no doubt this and the other injuries caused severe pain for some little time. We believe that $100 is not adequate and that the amount should be increased to $200, in addition to the medical ex-' penses to which plaintiff was put.

It is ordered that the judgment appealed from be and it is amended by increasing the amount thereof to' $218, with legal interest from judicial demand, and, as thus -amended, it is affirmed.

Amended and affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael Rideman, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Rideman

Michael RidemanCEODated: November 14, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc.and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
No. 12,748.

#### State of Louisiana vs. Billy Hickey.

The court again aflirms that testimony of threats of violence by the deceased against the accused, without proof of overt acts to carry the threats into execution, is inadmissible. Wharton’s Criminal Evidence, Sec. 757, notes; 35 An. 71; 37 An. 443, 489.

A PPEAL from the Second District Oourt for the Parish of Bossier. *Watkins, J.*

*M. J. Cunningham,*Attorney General, and *A. J. Murff,*District Attorney (P. *A, Simmons, Jr.,*of Counsel), for Plaintiff, Appellee.

*J. A. W. Lowry*for Defendant, Appellant.

Submitted on briefs March 12, 1898.

Opinion handed down April 18, 1898.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

This appeal is from the death sentence for murder.

We have no brief on behalf of the accused, but have, notwithstanding, examined the record to determine whether it supports the sentence.

We find a bill to the admission in evidence of an outcry of a person present when the fatal shot was fired. There was no dispute *601whatever as to the killing of the deceased by the accused, and this outcry, merely an exclamation, naturally evoked by the shot and! implying only the undisputed fact of the shot, can have no influence-on the jury; besides, the testimony of the exclamation was brought out by the line of examination on behalf of the accused.

The other bill reserved is the exclusion of testimony to prove threats by the deceased against the accused. The statement of the court in signing the bill, is that not- only was there no overt act of hostility of the deceased to authorize the testimony of the threats, bat that the shooting was without any provocation or ground of apprehension of any hostile act by the deceased. Under our jurisprudence the court was entirely correct in excluding the testimony.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the sentence of the lower court be affirmed.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Samuel Cain, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,377.

First District, Second Division.

September 27, 1966.

Rehearing denied October 19, 1966.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (Marshall A. Patner, Frederick F. Cohn and James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane, Joel M. Flaum and Robert J. Beranek, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

JUSTICE BURKE.

Not to be published in full.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fred Jones, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,549. (Abstract of Decision.)

First District, Second Division.

November 4, 1966.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (Frederick F. Cohn and James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and William J. Nellis, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by JUSTICE BURKE. Not to be published in full.
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Mondo Acquisition III, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in his capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:  November
                14, 2007
            By:
                /s/ Thomas A. RoseThomas
                A. RosePresident