alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33-98362, Form S-3 No. 333-03205, Form S-3 No. 333-03596, Form
S-3, No. 333-13363, and Form S-8, No. 52-1802283) of The Mills Corporation and
in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 16, 1998, except for
the first paragraph of Note 10, as to which the date is March 3, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Mills
Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.


                                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 27, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6032-6033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 111


Express Mail Sunday/Holiday Delivery Premium

AGENCY: Postal Service.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP> is revising 
ExpressMail[supreg] service to reflect a premium of $12.50 in addition 
to current postage for guaranteed Sunday or holiday delivery of Express 
Mail pieces.

DATES: Effective Date: March 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bert Olsen, 202-268-7276.
    We adopt the following amendments to Mailing Standards of the 
United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM[supreg]), 
incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 
CFR 111.1.

[[Page 6033]]

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111

    Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.

0
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is amended as follows:

PART 111--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 is revised to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414, 
416, 3001-3011, 3201-3219, 3403-3406, 3626, 3632, 3633, 5001.


0
2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United 
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), as follows:
* * * * *

100 Retail Letters, Cards, Flats, and Parcels

* * * * *

110 Express Mail

113 Rates and Eligibility

* * * * *

Exhibit 1.3 Express Mail Rates--Same Day Airport Service Suspended

* * * * *
    [Add an additional footnote, number 3, to Exhibit 1.3, Express Mail 
Rate Chart, as follows:]
    3. For Sunday/holiday delivery, add $12.50.
* * * * *
    [Renumber current 1.5 through 1.7 as new 1.6 through 1.8, and add 
new 1.5 as follows:]

1.5 Sunday and Holiday Premium

    When delivery is guaranteed for a Sunday or holiday, there is a 
premium of $12.50, unless paying via an Express Mail Manifesting 
Agreement. Customers not desiring delivery on a Sunday or a holiday may 
avoid the premium by opting for guaranteed delivery on the subsequent 
delivery day.
* * * * *

700 Special Standards

* * * * *

705 Advanced Preparation and Special Postage Payment Systems

* * * * *

2.0 Manifest Mailing System

* * * * *

2.6 Express Mail Manifesting Agreements

* * * * *

2.6.3 Service Guarantee

* * * * *
    [Revise current text to be identified as item b and add a new a as 
follows:]
    a. Mailers using Express Mail Manifesting (EMM) receive Sunday/
holiday guaranteed delivery at no additional charge without paying a 
premium.
* * * * *

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
 [FR Doc. E8-1775 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

CHEETAH MOBILE INC. 
  

			
	Number	  	Class A Ordinary Share(s)
		  	-[no. of shares]-

 Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands 

Share capital is the aggregate of 

US$250,000 divided into 10,000,000,000 Shares comprising of 

(i) 7,600,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000025 each; 

(ii) 1,400,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000025 each and 

(iii) 1,000,000,000 Shares of a par value of US$0.000025 each 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [name of shareholder] is the registered holder of [no. of shares] Class A Ordinary Share(s) in the above-named
Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof. 
 EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the      day of
             2014 by: 
  

			
	DIRECTOR	 	  









 TRANSFER 
  

			
	I	  	(the Transferor) for the value received
		
	DO HEREBY transfer to	  	(the Transferee) the
		
		  	shares standing in my name in the

 undertaking called CHEETAH MOBILE INC. 

To hold the same unto the Transferee 
 Dated 

Signed by the Transferor 
 in the presence of: 

 

					
	  
	 		 	  

	Witness	 		 	Transferor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PRASAD NAIR, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-11934

vs.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNIFIED BUSINESS

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COSTS

This matter has come before the court on plaintiff Prasad Nair’s motion for costs. 

Plaintiff also filed a bill of costs with the clerk of the Court. Post-judgment costs are a

matter handled by the clerk of the Court. Now, therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for costs is DENIED AS MOOT. 

It is so ordered.

 

Dated: October 5, 2009

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

October 5, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11934-GCS-DAS Doc # 22 Filed 10/05/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 170
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4189 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4189

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
   of vancomycin home parenteral therapy under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1996

  Mr. Stark introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
  Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 
 Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                 jurisdiction of the committee conerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
   of vancomycin home parenteral therapy under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Vancomycin Home Parenteral 
Therapy Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF VANCOMYCIN HOME PARENTERAL THERAPY.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(n)'' and inserting ``(n)(1)'';
            (2) by inserting ``vancomycin as described in paragraph 
        (2),'' after ``beds,''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) The vancomycin described in this paragraph is the 
antimicrobial vancomycin which is administered to a patient 
parenterally using an access device that is inserted into the body, if 
the patient's attending physician certifies that such administration is 
for treatment of an infection caused--
            ``(A) by beta-lactam-resistant gram-positive 
        microorganisms; or
            ``(B) by gram-positive microorganisms in the case of a 
        patient who has a severe allergy to beta-lactam 
        antimicrobials.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
with respect to vancomycin administered on or after January 1, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
31.2
 **Section
302 Certification**
  I,
Roy Graydon, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Call-Net Enterprises Inc., certify that:
 
 1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Call-Net
Enterprises Inc. ;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:
  (a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
February 22, 2005.
  /s/
      Roy GraydonName:
      Roy GraydonTitle:
      Executive Vice President &Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.  §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Migenix Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. DeMesa, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







James DeMesa

James M. DeMesa

President and Chief Executive Officer

September 17, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.9

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ V. Prem Watsa V. Prem Watsa
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date:    May 6, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and will be retained by
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

---



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

/s/ David Bonham David Bonham
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 6, 2015


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and will be retained by
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

2

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies this Annual Report
of Telular Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
September 30, 2006 (the "Report").

I, Michael J. Boyle, President & Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Jeffrey L. Herrmann, Executive Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Boyle                     
|Michael J.
      Boyle                   
|President
      & Chief Executive Officer
|December 12,
      2006                  

|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ Jeffrey L. Herrmann                                                            
|Jeffrey L.
    Herrmann                                                            
|Executive Vice President,
      Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|December 12,
  2006                                                                

59

---
Exhibit
31.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  I, Gary
Spaniak, President and Chief Executive Officer of Classic Costume Company, Inc.,
(the “Registrant”), certify that:
  1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;
  2.    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
  3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  4.    The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
  (a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  (b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)    disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
  5.    The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of
directors:
  (a)    all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
  May
      14, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Gary
      SpaniakGary
      SpaniakPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43966

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SCOTT GREGORY HAYES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 718

Filed: October 4, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for attempted rape, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. 

Swinford, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Scott Gregory Hayes pled guilty to attempted rape, Idaho Code §§ 18-6101(1), 18-306. 

The district court imposed a unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of two years. Hayes appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 
2

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Hayes’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RYAN PALMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL KUHN AND BEVERLY SAINZ,

Defendants.

Case No. 09-12316

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. GRAND

 

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [34] AND GRANTING DEFENDANT SAINZ’S MOTION TO

DISMISS [20] AND GRANTING DEFENDANT KUHN’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [27] AND FINDING MOOT DEFENDANT SAINZ’S

MOTION TO COMPEL [32]

On January 12, 2012, Magistrate Judge Grand issued a Report and Recommendation [34]

that Defendant Sainz’s Motion to Dismiss [20] be GRANTED and Defendant Kuhn’s Motion to

Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment [27] be GRANTED. 

No objection to the Report and Recommendation was filed. The Court has reviewed the

record in this case. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and is

entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 

 Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sainz’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Defendant

Kuhn’s Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Defendant Sainz’s

Motion to Compel is MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 20, 2012

2:09-cv-12316-AJT-DRG Doc # 35 Filed 03/20/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 175