alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WOODWARD AVENUE PROTESTANT

CHURCH OF CHRIST, a Michigan Domestic

Non-Profit Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-cv-12178

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY

COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER TO PAY DEFENDANT’S COSTS AND PERMITTING FILING OF REPLY BRIEF

On April 28, 2010, the Court held a hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

(Dkt. No. 18). Plaintiff’s counsel failed to file a timely response to Defendant’s motion which was

due on March 26, 2010. Indeed, Plaintiff did not file a response until after the time set for the

hearing, to which he arrived 30 minutes late. This vexatious and delinquent conduct by Plaintiff’s

counsel, where he came in late and provided defense counsel and the Court with his pleading,

rendered the hearing a non-event. 

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff’s counsel to pay

Defendant’s counsel’s costs for the two hours associated with attending the hearing on April 28,

2010, and further ORDERS that Defendant shall have 10 days within in which to file a 5-page reply
2

to Plaintiff’s untimely-filed response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 30, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

April 30, 2010.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
#### Andre BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52218.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 16, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Andre Boyd appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing after pleading guilty to four counts of rape and one count of burglary in the first degree. He claims trial counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate a potential alibi defense. The motion court’s judgment is affirmed by summary order. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4116 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4116

 To provide for the issuance of a noncompetitive oil and gas lease for 
                             certain lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 1996

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the issuance of a noncompetitive oil and gas lease for 
                             certain lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ISSUANCE OF NONCOMPETITIVE LEASE FOR CERTAIN LANDS.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall issue a noncompetitive oil and 
gas lease under the Mineral Leasing Act (as in effect before December 
22, 1987) in accordance with section 5106(a) of the Federal Onshore Oil 
and Gas Leasing Reform Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-203; 30 U.S.C. 226 
note) to Stephen E. Bubala for the area subject to noncompetitive lease 
offer CA11297 notwithstanding the location of a Known Geologic 
Structure within such area.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rodney R. GARRINGER, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 20429.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

March 8, 1996.

Steven H. Kaderly, Pros. Atty., Barton County, Lamar, for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

PARRISH, Judge.

Rodney R. Garringer (defendant) was charged with driving while intoxicated. § 577.010.1 He filed a motion to dismiss the information alleging that he was being subjected to double jeopardy. The state had previously suspended defendant’s driver’s license as permitted by § 302.500, *et seq.,*based on the same conduct that resulted in the driving while intoxicated charge. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed *926the information. The state appeals the dismissal of the charge as permitted by § 547.200.2.

The only issue on appeal is whether prosecution for the offense of driving while intoxicated would subject defendant to double jeopardy because of the prior suspension of his driver’s license. This court finds it would not.

The state presents two points on appeal. Both assert the trial court erred in holding that defendant’s criminal charge subjected him to double jeopardy as a result of his having previously had his driver’s license suspended based on the same conduct that resulted in the driving while intoxicated charge.

In Point I the state argues that the administrative suspension was not punishment for defendant’s conduct. In Point II it argues that the legislature, in providing for an administrative procedure for suspending a driver’s license under these facts intended a driver to “be subject to both criminal punishment and administrative sanctions as the result of the same conduct.”

The double jeopardy issue raised by the state was resolved in its favor by the Supreme Court of Missouri in *State v. Mayo,*915 S.W.2d 758 (Mo. banc 1996). Points I and II are granted. The order dismissing the information is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.

SHRUM, C.J., and CROW, J., concur.

1

. References to statutes are to RSMo 1994.
#### The Troy Laundry Machinery Company, Limited, Respondent, v. Samuel Schlesinger, etc., Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Wódward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Juan Restrepo Gutierrez, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Chancery
      Resources, Inc. for the period ended February 29, 2008 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Chancery Resources, Inc.                                                                        

Dated: April 22, 2008

| | /s/ *Juan Restrepo Gutierrez*                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Juan Restrepo Gutierrez                                
| | President, Treasurer and Director                      
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              
| | Chancery Resources, Inc.                               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chancery
Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Chancery Resources, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Epidemiology, Prevention and Behavior Research Review Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         October 22-23, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Crowne Plaza Tysons Corner, 1960 Chain Bridge Road, Mclean, VA 22102.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Lorraine Gunzerath, PhD, MBA, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Office of Extramural Activities, Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 3043, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, 301-443-2369,                         *lgunzera@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 31, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E8-18252 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**


**ACTING
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**


**AVRO
      ENERGY INC.**


**FORM
      10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Mike
      P. Kurtanjek , am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
      of Avro Energy Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering
      this
      certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 and filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                December 13, 2007By:
                */s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek*
              MIKE
                  P. KURTANJEK
              Chief
                Executive Officer, President, acting Chief Financial Officer, acting
                Principal Accounting Officer and Director
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gary Spaniak, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Electric Car Company, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or cause such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditor and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 20, 2009

/s/ Gary Spaniak

Gary Spaniak 

Principal Financial Officer
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. T.J. WALKER, Defendant/Appellant. T.J. WALKER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 63725, 66389.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Jan. 31, 1995.

Doug R. Hoff, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., and REINHARD and CARL R. GAERTNER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted defendant of second degree robbery and attempted second degree robbery. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender, as well as a Class X offender, to twenty years for robbery and ten years concurrently for attempted robbery. Defendant appeals.*

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*880The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

*

 Defendant also appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. However, defendant’s brief does not contain any points relating thereto. Therefore, this appeal is deemed abandoned and the motion court’s judgment is affirmed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4129

To enforce the constitutional right to the free exercise of religion.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1996

Mr. HOKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To enforce the constitutional right to the free exercise of

religion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Religious

5 Expression Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS PROTECTED.

7 Students in public schools—

8 (1) have the same right to engage in individual

9 or group prayer and religious discussions in or con10 nected with school as they do to engage in other

11 comparable activity;
2

•HR 4129 IH

1 (2) may express their beliefs about religion in

2 the form of homework, artwork, and other written

3 and oral assignments free from discrimination based

4 on the religious content of their submissions;

5 (3) have a right to distribute religious literature

6 to their schoolmates on the same terms as they are

7 permitted to distribute other literature that is unre8 lated to school curriculum or activities; and

9 (4) may display or otherwise communicate reli10 gious messages, including on items of clothing, to

11 the same extent they are permitted to display or

12 communicate other messages.

13 SEC. 3. CIVIL ACTION.

14 A person aggrieved by a violation of section 2 may

15 in a civil action obtain appropriate relief. Such an action

16 may be instituted against a governmental entity as well

17 as against any person engaging in the violation.

18 SEC. 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM HOT19 LINE.

20 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall estab21 lish, maintain, and publicize a toll-free number to provide

22 timely and accurate information and respond to questions

23 regarding the rights protected by this Act.

24 (b) OFFSET.—Notwithstanding any other provision

25 of law, funds available under section 458 of the Higher
3

•HR 4129 IH

1 Education Act, shall be reduced by $5,000,000 for fiscal

2 year 1997.

Æ
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4273

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of

pharmaceutical grade phospholipids.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain

entries of pharmaceutical grade phospholipids.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PHARMACEUTICAL GRADE PHOSPHOLIPIDS.

4 Notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of

5 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon

6 proper request filed with the Customs Service not later

7 than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,

8 any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption,

9 of pharmaceutical grade phospholipids that—
2

•HR 4273 IH

1 (1) was made under subheading 2923.20.00 of

2 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United

3 States after March 29, 1991, and before January 1,

4 1995, and

5 (2) with respect to which a lower rate of duty

6 would have applied if such entry or withdrawal had

7 been made on January 1, 1995,

8 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such lower rate

9 of duty applied to such entry or withdrawal.

Æ
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobile Data Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Cozine,
President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.













/s/
Steven Cozine


Steven
Cozine


Chief
Executive Officer






June 14,
2010
















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobile Data Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Belkis Jimenez Rivero,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




















/s/
Belkis Jimenez Rivero


Belkis
Jimenez Rivero


Chief
Financial Officer






June 14,
2010