alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 11

- 1743

_____________

CHARLES MCNAIR; THEODORE AUSTIN; DANIELLE

DEMETRIOU;

USHMA DESAI; JULIE DYNKO,

Appellants

,

v.

SYNAPSE GROUP INC.

Appellee.

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. No. 06

- cv

- 5072)

District Judge: Hon. Jose L. Linares

_______________

Argued

January 10, 2012

Before: FUENT ES, JORDAN

, and NYGAARD, Circuit

Judges

.2 (Filed March 6, 2012 )

_______________

Paul Diamond

1605 John Street

- #102

Fort Lee, NJ 07024

Gary S. Graifman [ARGUED]

Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman

747 Chestnut Ridge Road

- #200

Chestnut Ridge, NY 10977

Michael S. Green

Green & Associates

522 Route 18

- #5

P.O. Box 428

East Brunswick, NJ 08816

Counsel for Appellants

Geoffrey W. Castello, III

Lauri A. Mazzuchetti

Vincent P. Rao, II

Kelley, Drye & Warren

200 Kimball Drive

Parsippany, NJ 07054

Thomas E. Gilbertsen [ARGUED]

Ven a ble

575 7 th Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

Counsel for Appellee

_______________3 ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_______________

JORDAN, Circuit Judge

.

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the above

- captioned

opinion be ame nded as follows:

At the bottom of page 2, “Veneble” shall be deleted and

replaced with “Venable”.

/s/ Kent A. Jordan

Circuit Judge

Dated : March 9, 2012

SLC/cc: Geoffrey W. Castello, III

Thomas E. Gilbersten

Gary S. Graifman

Lauri A. Mazzuchetti
#### Edwin Dumble, Appellant, *v.*Hyman D. Baker, Impleaded with Mary Ehrmann, Respondent.

Appeal from an order entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 18th day of November, 1908, granting a motion to vacate an order for the examination of defendant before trial.

Per Curiam :

The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate the order for the examination of the defendant denied ; the examination, however, *to*be limited *to*the issues raised by the allegations contained in the 2d paragraph of the complaint, and the denial thereof by the defendant. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and order entered as stated in opinion. Settle order on notice.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JOSE ARREDONDO, a.k.a. Jose Guadalupe

Arredondo,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50078

D.C. No. 8:16

- cr

- 00075

- DOC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN , and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Arredondo appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his guilty

- plea conviction s and 168

- month concurrent sentence s for distribution of

methamphetamine and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C . § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)

. Pursuant to Anders v. California

,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50078

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Arredondo ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Arredondo the oppo rtunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct app eal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 469

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of the

surviving spouse of a veteran after age 55 shall not result in termination

of dependency and indemnity compensation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 11, 1995

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that

remarriage of the surviving spouse of a veteran after

age 55 shall not result in termination of dependency

and indemnity compensation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 103(d) of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding the following new paragraph after

5 paragraph (3):
2

•HR 469 IH

1 ‘‘(4) The remarriage after age 55 of a surviving

2 spouse of a veteran shall not bar payment of benefits

3 under section 1311 of this title.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case Number 09-20403-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

v.

D-1 CORY DEMOND HAYNES,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT ONE OF THE SECOND

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT

UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on June 22, 2010, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. Judge Binder issued his report on June 23, 2010,

recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one of the second

superseding indictment. As of today’s date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Binder’s

report and recommendation. The election to not file objections to the report releases the Court from

its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation [Dkt. # 71] is

ADOPTED.
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one of the second

superseding indictment is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 68] is taken

UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 27, 2010

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 27, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**Statement
      Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the**


**Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**





**Exhibit
      32.2**




**STATEMENT
      FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002,**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**




The
      undersigned, Steven A. Bohn, is the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
      of AMB Financial Corp. (the “Company”).




This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
“Report”).




By
      execution of this statement, I certify that:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)]
                and




2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.




This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
      be
      deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




March
                28, 2008
            /s/
                Steven A. BohnDate
            Steven
                A. BohnVice
                President and Chief Financial
                Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18515]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Kansas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Kansas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene by 
conference call at 1 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 2 p.m. on 
Thursday, August 28, 2008. The purpose of this meeting is to plan a 
public briefing meeting.
    This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-
free call-in number: (866) 364-7584, conference call access code number 
5788509. Any interested member of the public may call this number and 
listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls 
they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund 
any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they 
initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. 
Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by 
first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-977-8339 and providing 
the Service with the conference call number and contact name Farella E. 
Robinson.
    To ensure that the Commission secures an appropriate number of 
lines for the public, persons are asked to register by contacting 
Corrine Sanders of the Central Regional Office and TTY/TDD telephone 
number, by 4 p.m. on August 18, 2008.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by August 18, 2008. 
The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 400 State Avenue, Suite 
908, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Comments may be e-mailed to 
[email protected]. Records generated by this meeting may be inspected 
and reproduced at the Central Regional Office, as they become 
available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the 
work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's 
Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Central Regional 
Office at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, August 6, 2008.
Christopher Byrnes,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
 [FR Doc. E8-18515 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Philip Cook, Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC,the general partner of Quicksilver Gas Services LP, the registrant, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Quicksilver Gas Services LP;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 9, 2007                      /s/  Philip Cook   Philip Cook   Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000914804
<NAME> FIRST FORTIS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           130,038
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 130,868
<CASH>                                           1,160
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              28,458
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           3,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,502
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                104,861
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              8,535
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  11,084
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,502
<PREMIUMS>                                      54,451
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              8,187
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,436
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,202
<BENEFITS>                                      43,598
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      (106)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            17,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,452
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,452
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  60,498
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             16,816
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                9,800
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              11,639
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                12,935
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 62,540
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>




                                 EXHIBIT 23.2

                     (LETTERHEAD OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY)


                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


      As independent  petroleum  engineers,  we hereby consent to (a) the use of
our name and  references  to our firm in the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of 3DX
Technologies  Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998 and (b) to the inclusion
of the estimate of proved  reserves and present value of the future net revenues
included in our report dated January 27, 1999 in such Annual Report.




                                                           RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                           PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Houston, Texas
March 24, 1999
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-20402-02-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

PHILLIP JOSEPH LAFATA,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S GUILTY PLEA, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT

UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on July 2, 2010, by U.S. Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder

pursuant to the Defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report [Dkt. # 54] on July 2,

2010, recommending acceptance of Defendant’s guilty plea. Either party may serve and file written

objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and

recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination

of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party

objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 54] is ADOPTED.
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea to one count of unlawful use of a

communications facility, 21 U.S.C. § 843(b), is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt.

# 51] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 20, 2010

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 20, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
#### Continental Automobile Mutual Ins. Co. *v.*Scurry et al.

(No. 23103

Decided November 4, 1931.)

*Messrs. Miller S Finney,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Marshall S Marshall,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and tbe same is hereby, dismissed for tbe reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11306 and #11307]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Illinois ( FEMA-1771-DR), dated 06/25/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/22/2008.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

07/22/2008.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/25/2008.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/23/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of ILLINOIS, dated 06/25/2008 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/22/2008.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-17773 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Willis A. Winnie, Plaintiff, v. Solomon Mehrbach, Defendant.

Decision amended by directing that the item of §670.50, which was for a cargo of ice delivered to the plaintiff subsequent to September 8, 1903, be credited upon the account since that date, as the item was originally charged to that portion of the account; and by directing that the item of §762.97 be credited upon the account before that date. The order to be entered upon such decision to be settled accordingly. (See 130 App. Div. 329.)
#### TULANE HARDWOOD LUMBER CO., Inc. v. SINGER LUMBER CO., Inc.

No. 16324.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 22, 1936.

For former opinion, see 168 So. 368.

Wisdom & Stone and Norton L. Wisdom, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Cobb & Jones and Herman M. Baginsky, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, in application for rehearing, complains of the fact that in our decree we did not reserve to him the right to obtain possession of the merchandise which formed the basis of the suit upon payment by him of the amount of the judgment rendered against him.

No such reservation in the decree is necessai'y. The amount of the decree is the purchase price of the articles, and, obviously, when the amount thereof is paid, defendant will be entitled to possession of the articles for which he will then have paid the purchase price.

The application for rehearing is refused.

Reheáring refused.