alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Divio Holdings, Corp.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






PROMISSORY NOTE 

	Principal Amount: $10,000 USD 	Belize City, Belize 
	 	February 13, 2014 


VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, DIVIO HOLDINGS, CORP.
(borrower), promises to pay to the order of PAREALL INTERNATIONAL LTD. (lender),
at 60 Market Square, Belize City, PO Box 364, Belize, ON DEMAND, the sum of TEN
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000), with interest calculated monthly at a rate of 6% per
annum, payable on maturity. Interest will commence to accrue on and after March
1, 2014.

Presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of
dishonour and protest hereof are hereby waived. 

	 	DIVIO HOLDINGS, CORP. 
	 	 
	 	Per: 
	 	 
	 	/s/
      James Grant 
	 	James Grant, Director
OAO450 (Rev 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

ANTHONY PEAK, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Plaintiff

V.

KUBOTA TRACTOR CORP., ET.AL, Case Number: 09-13762

Defendants

X Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has

rendered its verdict.

G Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and

a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that the Plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that the Defendants recover of the

Plaintiff their costs of action.

June 28, 2013 DAVID J. WEAVER

Date Clerk

(By) Deputy Clerk

s/Marilyn Orem

2:09-cv-13762-PJD-MJH Doc # 118 Filed 06/28/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 2136
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 13, 2018

NO. 03-18-00251-CV

Jennifer Castilleja, Appellant

v.

Terryl Monterastelli and Kahlig Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Bluebonnet Motors, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on July 26, 2016. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellant 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
#### UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Irving ZAFRIN and Irving Kremer, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 246.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 10, 1938.

Maxwell Shapiro, of New York City, for appellants.

Harold St. L. O. Dougherty, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn (Vine H. Smith, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges,

PER CURIAM.

Judgment, 22 F.Supp. 601, affirmed in open court.
#### Clarence ANTOINE v. INTERURBAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Inc.

No. 4125.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

March 16, 1932.

Guión & Upton, of New Orleans, and Peter-man, Dear & Peterman, of Alexandria, for appellant.

Hawthorn, Stafford & Pitts, of Alexandria, for appellee..

McGregor, j.

This case grows out of the same state. of facts as those of Peter and Adeline Antoine against this same defendant. The three cases were consolidated for trial and were all submitted on the same evidence. The lower court rejected the plaintiff’s demand and rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Eor the reasons assigned in the case of Peter Antoine v. Interurban Transportation Company, Incorporated, 140 So. 151, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, with all the costs to be paid by the plaintiff, appellant.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Chin Hsiao, Chief
Financial Officer of CHINA ADVANCED CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS GROUP, INC. (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.      The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has executed this statement this 15th day of May, 2009.





/s/ Chin HsiaoChin
      HsiaoChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and will be retained by China
Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
Case 2:09-mj-30214-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 05/01/09 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:09-mj-30214-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 05/01/09 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:09-mj-30214-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 05/01/09 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:09-mj-30214-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 05/01/09 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:09-mj-30214-DUTY ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 05/01/09 Page 5 of 5
*Local rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have no precedential value

and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule,

the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60146

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEANGELO WILLIAMS, a/k/a Dee,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Mississippi

(4:94cr81-S)

November 28, 1995

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, DUHÉ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

DeangeloWilliams,found guilty by a jury of conspiracyto distribute, possessionwith

intent to distribute, and aiding and abetting in the distribution and possession with intent to

distribute crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846, and 2, appeals his conviction, challenging

the admission of an audio tape and transcript thereof and the sufficiency of the evidence.

Finding no error in the admission of the audio tape or in the admission and use of a transcript

made by a government witness, and persuaded by the adequacy of the evidence, we affirm.
2

Williams contends that the district court erred in admitting into evidence the tape

recording of a drug transaction because portions of the recording were unintelligible. He

also maintains that the district court erred in allowing the jury to use a transcript of the

recording. Williams did not object to the admission of the recording and withdrew his

objection to the jury’s use of the transcript. Therefore, any error must be reviewed for plain

error. United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1266

(1995). The district court did not commit error, plain or otherwise, in admitting the tape

recording and allowing the jury to use the transcript as the tape was played. The court

carefully charged the jury that the tape was the evidence of its content and they were to

determine the accuracy of the transcript which was offered only as an aid to their listening

to the audio.

Williams also contendsthat the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions.

The testimony of co-conspirator Kenny White, which was corroborated by the testimony of

the arresting officers and enforced by the tape recording, establishes that Williams was the

supplier of the cocaine and participated in the sale of the drugs to the undercover officer.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, a rational trier of fact could

find that the government proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Williams committed the

offenses. See United States v. Davis, 61 F.3d 291 (5th Cir. 1995).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Helen H. Gaebler, Respondent, v. Guiseppe Gallo and Francisco Pittelli, Appellants, Impleaded with New York City Railway Company.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Scott, J., dissented.
Exhibit








COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES


As of December 31, 2019, Commonwealth Edison Company (“ComEd” or the “Company”) had two classes of common stock purchase warrants registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); the Company’s common stock, into which both classes of warrants are exercisable, is not registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.  


1971 Warrants


On April 13, 1971, the ComEd Board of Directors created a series of common stock purchase warrants (the 1971 Warrants), pursuant to which holders can convert the 1971 Warrants into the Company’s common stock at a rate of one (1) share of common stock for every three (3) warrants; prior to April 30, 1981, the 1971 Warrants were exercisable into shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate of one (1) share of common stock for every three (3) warrants at an exercise price of $30 per warrant.  The 1971 Warrants do not have an expiration date.  


The 1971 Warrants have no established trading market and there is no assurance concerning the liquidity of any market that may develop for the 1971 Warrants. Consequently, holders of the 1971 Warrants may not be able to liquidate their investment readily, and lenders may not readily accept the 1971 Warrants as collateral for loans.


As of December 31, 2019, there were 40,588 1971 Warrants outstanding.     




Series B Warrants


On February 1, 1972, the ComEd Board of Directors created a series of common stock purchase warrants (the Series B Warrants), pursuant to which holders can convert the Series B Warrants into the Company’s common stock at a rate of one (1) share of common stock for every three (3) warrants; prior to April 30, 1981, the Series B Warrants were exercisable into shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate of one (1) share of common stock for every three (3) warrants at an exercise price of $30 per warrant.  The Series B Warrants do not have an expiration date.  


The Series B Warrants have no established trading market and there is no assurance concerning the liquidity of any market that may develop for the Series B Warrants. Consequently, holders of the Series B Warrants may not be able to liquidate their investment readily, and lenders may not readily accept the Series B Warrants as collateral for loans.


As of December 31, 2019, there were 19,670 Series B Warrants outstanding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                             
<ARTICLE>                                5
<CIK>                                    0000915390
<NAME>                                   Arch Communications Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<CURRENCY>                               USD
                                                   
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                       1,633
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               30,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 6,583
<INVENTORY>                                                 10,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            50,712
<PP&E>                                                     428,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                             209,128
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             904,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       87,014
<BONDS>                                                  1,003,499
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      3
<COMMON>                                                       212
<OTHER-SE>                                                (213,678)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               904,285
<SALES>                                                     42,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           413,635
<CGS>                                                       29,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               29,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            80,782
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             8,545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         105,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (204,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (204,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             (1,720)
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (206,051)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (9.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (9.86)
        
 

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Monday, August 18, 2008.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve 
System employees.
    2. Staff resource and work product planning.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 8, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-18773 Filed 8-8-08; 3:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CROWN
NORTHCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE YEAR ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,942,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,262,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,636,252
<PP&E>                                       2,685,834
<DEPRECIATION>                                 989,624
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,448,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,594,832
<BONDS>                                      2,935,950
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,400,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,651
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,797,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,448,991
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,982,716
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,089,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               658,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               118,879
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             286,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,171,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,171,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,171,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)
        

</TABLE>
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 419

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received, read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 419 RFS

1 SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

2 (a) FINDING.—The Congress finds that Benchmark

3 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily per4 formed emergency work after the Northridge earthquake,

5 but has not been reimbursed as a result of a technicality

6 under California State law.

7 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to fairly

8 compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for

9 which, except for the technicality under California State

10 law, it would otherwise have been paid under the provi11 sions of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer12 gency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121).

13 SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

15 date of enactment of this Act, the director of the Federal

16 Emergency Management Agency shall pay to Benchmark

17 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an amount equal

18 to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.,

19 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the

20 State of California to compensate Benchmark Rail Group,

21 Inc., for the emergency work and services performed at

22 the request of the Southern California Regional Rail Au23 thority, to the extent that such work and services are oth24 erwise eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T.

25 Stafford Disaster and Emergency Assistance Act (42
3

HR 419 RFS

1 U.S.C. 5121). The payment shall be made from funds ap2 propriated to implement such Act.

3 (b) DEOBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Federal Emer4 gency Management Agency shall deobligate an equal

5 amount to that obligated previously for payment to the

6 State of California to cover the costs of work performed

7 for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority by

8 Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., after the Northridge earth9 quake which would have been eligible for reimbursement

10 under such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 12.1

                             SUMMIT PROPERTIES INC.
               CALCULATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                  ------------------------------------------------
                                                   1999       1998      1997      1996      1995
                                                  -------   --------   -------   -------   -------
<S>                                               <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
Income before minority interest of unitholders
  in Operating Partnership and extraordinary
  items.........................................  $59,760   $ 66,475   $31,934   $21,187   $15,051
Interest:
  Expense incurred..............................   37,282     32,550    20,902    16,113    13,715
  Amortization of deferred financing costs......      992        956     1,057     1,025     1,087
  Rental fixed charges..........................      159        133       115       124       134
                                                  -------   --------   -------   -------   -------
          Total.................................  $98,193   $100,114   $54,008   $38,449   $29,987
                                                  =======   ========   =======   =======   =======
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense..............................  $37,282   $ 32,550   $20,902   $16,113   $13,715
  Interest capitalized..........................    7,888      6,143     5,876     4,266     3,110
  Dividends to preferred unitholders in
     Operating Partnership......................    6,698         --        --        --        --
  Rental fixed charges..........................      159        133       115       124       134
  Amortization of deferred financing costs......      992        956     1,057     1,025     1,087
                                                  -------   --------   -------   -------   -------
          Total.................................  $53,019   $ 39,782   $27,950   $21,528   $18,046
                                                  =======   ========   =======   =======   =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges..............     1.85       2.52      1.93      1.79      1.66
                                                  =======   ========   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>