T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NO T F ORP UB L I C AT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J ASON SC HM I DT, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C I T Y O F S E A T T L E ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 36016 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 1 0 5 - TSZ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on T hom a s S . Z i l l y , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r6, 2009

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , K L E IN F E L D an d C L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n thi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 c i vi l r i ght s a c t i on, J a s on S c hm i dtappe a l s f r om the g r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in f a v o ro f th e C ityo f

S e a ttle a n d C h ie f

G il K e r lik o w s k e , O f

f ic e rR ic h a r d Z u r c h e ran d L ie u te n a n t D o n n ie L o w e o f th e S e a ttle P o lic e D e p a rtm e n t w h o w e r e s u e d in th e irin d iv id u a l a n d o f f ic ia l c ap a c itie s . W e 

# FI LED DE C 04 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e a f f irm in p a rt, v a c a te in p a rt, an d rem an d fo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. I S c h m id t c o n te n d s th a t O f f ic e rZ u r c h e ra n d L ie u te n a n t L o w e v io la te d h is fe dera l const i tut i on al ri gh tt o p art i ci pat e i n a stre etpara de thathad b ee n autho ri ze d b y th e C ityo f

S e a ttle . Se e H

ague v . C om m . f

orI ndus . O r g. , 307 U . S . 496, 515 ( 1 9 3 9 ) ( C itiz e n s o f

th e U n ite d S ta te s h a v e r ig h t to a s s e m b le in p u b lic a r e a s to d is c u s s v ie w s o n p ub lic q u e s tio n s a s p a rt o f th e ir“p r iv ile g e s , im m u n itie s , r ig h ts a nd l i be rt i e s ” ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtc onc l ude d tha tO f f i c e rZ ur c he ra nd L i e ut e na nt L o w e w e r e e n title d to q u a lif ie d im m u n ityb a s e d o n th e d e c la r a tio n s th e yf ile d in supp ortof thei r m ot i on for s um m ary j ud gm ent . In i t s ordergrant i ng sum m ary ju d g m e n t, th e d is tr ic t c o u rt s ta te d th a t

O f f i c e rZ ur c he robs e rve d pl a i nt i f f m e a nde r i ng dow n one of the w e s tl a ne s of

F ourth A ve nue . W e s t l a ke P a rk i s on the e a s ts i de of

F ourth A ve nue , a nd P l a i nt i f f di d not ap p e a rt o b e h e a d i n g i n th e d i r e c t i o n o f th e A . N . S. W . E. R. r a l l y . P l a i nt i f

f w a s notne a rthe pa rt i c i pa nt s of the m a r c h, a nd he di d notha ve a nyobvi ous i m pa i rm e nttha tm i ght h a v e in h ib ite d h is ab ilityto k e e p u p w ith th e m a r c h . S c hm i dtf

i l e d ade c l a r a t i on i n r e s pons e t o the de f e nda nt s ’ m ot i on f

or sum m ary j ud gm enti n w hi ch he al l eged3 I w a s c l e a r l ya nd obvi ous l ypa rtof the m a r c h. I ha d no in te n tio n o f

s to p p in g o rb lo c k in g tr a f f ic , a n d n e v e rd id so. I w as atthe t ai l end o f the m ar ch as w e app roac hed W es t l ake P l az a, w here a r al l y and som e s peakers w er e p la n n e d . . . . T h e r e w e r e o th e rm a r c h e r s a ls o in th is ta il en d , al so o n th e street , i n m y i m m ed i at e v i ci n i ty. T h e a c c o u n ts s u b m itte d b yS c h m id t a n d th e o f f ic e r s o f w h a t le d to S chm i dt ’ s arr es tar e c l earl y i n con fl i ct . S um m ary j ud gm entcann otbe grant ed w he r e age nui ne i s s ue of m a t e r i a l f

a c ti s i n di s put e . F e d R . C i v. P . 56( c ) . T he d i stri ctco u rtv i o l at ed R u l e 5 6 (c) b y fai l i n g t o co n si d er th e fact s i n th e l i g h tm o st f a v o r ab le to S c h m id t a s th e n o n - m o v in g p a rty . See U ni ted Stat es v. D i ebold, Inc. , 3 6 9 U. S . 6 5 4 , 6 5 5 ( 1 9 6 2 ) ( “ On s u m m a ryj u d g m e n tth e i n f e r e n c e s t o b e d r a wn f r om the unde r l y i ng f

a c t s c ont a i ne d i n s uc h m a t e r i a l s m us tbe vi e w e d i n the l i ght m o s tf a v o r ab l e t o th e p a rtyo p p o s i n g th e m o t i o n . ” ) . I tf o l l o ws , th e r e f

o r e , th a twe m ustvaca t e the order hol di ng thatO ff i ce r Z urcher and L i eut enantL ow e w er e e n title d to s u m m a ryju d g m e n t. II T he di stri ctcourtdi d n oterr i n g rant i ng sum m ary j ud gm entun der R ul e 56( c ) i n f

a vorof the C i tyof

S e a tt l e a nd C hi e f

K e r l i kow s ke be c aus e S c hm i dt f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e tha tthe C i tya nd C hi e f K e r l i kow s ke e nga ge d i n apa tt e rn or pr a c t i c e of

a rr e s t i ng m a r c h pa rt i c i pa nt s , ortha tthe yf a i l e d a de qua t e l yt o tr a i n,4

s u p e rv is e , o rd is c ip lin e th e iro f f ic e r s . Se e B lanke nhorn v . C i t yof O r ange , 485 F . 3d 4 6 3 , 4 8 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) (T o sh o w a fai l u re t o trai n p o l i ce o ffi cers, a p l ai n t i ff m u st p r e s e n t e v id e n c e th a t “( 1 ) h e w a s d e p r iv e d o f ac o n s titu tio n a l r ig h t, ( 2 ) th e C ity had a tra i ni ng po l i cythatam ou nt s t o d el i bera t e i nd i ff er ence t o the const i tut i on al r ig h ts o f th e p e r s o n s w ith w h o m its p o lic e o f f ic e r s a r e lik e lyto c o m e in to c o n ta c t; a n d ( 3 ) h is c o n s titu tio n a l in ju ryw o u ld h a v e b e e n a v o id e d h a d th e C ityp r o p e r ly tr a i ne d thos e of

f i c e r s . ” ) ( i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks om i tt e d) . S c hm i dtha s not pres ent ed any e vi dence of a patt ern o r pol i cyam ou nt i ng t o d el i bera t e i nd i ff er ence , n o rh a s h e p r e s e n te d e v id e n c e th a t th e a lle g e d c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n w a s ar e s u lt o f af a ilu r e to tr a in th e o f

f ic e r s . S upe rvi s or s a r e onl ype r s ona l l yl i abl e f orda m a ge s unde r42 U . S . C . § 1983 w hen the evi dence s ho w s thatthey part i ci pat ed i n, di re ct ed, or kn ew of the al l eged c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n s , a n d f a ile d to in te rv e n e to p r e v e n t th e m . T a ylo r v. L ist , 8 8 0 F .2 d 1 0 4 0 , 1 0 4 5 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 8 9 ) ( “L iab ilityu n d e rs e c tio n 1 9 8 3 a r is e s o n ly up on a s ho w i ng of pers on al part i ci pat i on by the defendant . ”) . T here i s no evi dence i n the re cord thatC hi ef

K er l i ko w ske had any kno w l edge no r any pers on al p art i ci p at i o n i n an y o f th e al l eg ed co n st i tu t i o n al v i o l at i o n s. AF F I RME D I N P AR T , V AC AT E D I N P AR T , AN D R E MAND E D. E ach p arty sh al l p ay i t s o w n co st s.5