alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00468

- CV

In the Matter of D.W. §

§

§

§ From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 103885

- 16)

October 26

, 2017

Opinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
**Exhibit 32.2**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WABCO Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ulrich Michel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

Dated: May 7, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

t0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148750

RAYMOND STRUDGEON,

Plaintiff

- Appell ant,

v SC: 148750

COA: 316965

MCAC: 12

- 000027

BURT WATSON CHEVROLET

- PONTIAC,

L.L.C.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2014 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 4.3


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated April 15, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-194353) of Smart Trust, Tax-Advantaged
Growth & Income Trust, Series 4.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


April 15, 2014
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONT PR 20-0004

IN RE PETITION OF DAVID GORDON FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

# LE APR 1 4 2020

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court 0R D

Smelt Mnntana

David Gordon haspetitioned this Courtforreinstatementto active status in the State Bar of Montana. Gordon voluntarily chose inactive status in April 2016, and was suspended for nonpayment ofdues in June 2017. Therefore,given the circumstances and length oftime since Gordon has been on active status, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit to an investigation by the Commission on Character and Fitness. Petitioner shall comply with the character and fitness process and timely produce information and documentation as requested by the Commission. The Commission will investigate Petitioner's character and fitness in accordance with the Rules ofProcedure ofthe Commission on Character and Fitness. The Commission may,in its discretion, conduct a limited investigation. The Commission will advise the Courtwhether thePetitioner has been certified,conditionally certified,or denied certification. If the Commission denies certification, the Commission will issue written findings offact,conclusions oflaw,and a decision pursuant to Section 5(c)(6)ofthe Rules ofProcedure ofthe Commission on Character and Fitness. Ifthe Petitioner is certified or conditionally certified by the Commission on Character and Fitness,the Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in Montana upon payment of appropriate dues and fees and penalties to the State Bar ofMontana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if admitted, within six months of admission to the active practice of law, Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status. 04/14/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0004The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar ofMontana. DATED this I L

\ day ofApril, 2020.

Justices

2
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








The undersigned, Juhani Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer, and Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting Officer, of Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period June 30, 2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:     September 15, 2010


By:  /s/ Juhani Taskinen


Juhani Taskinen


Chief Executive Officer





September 15, 2010


By:  /s/Trupti Mehta


Principal Accounting Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                AVRO ENERGY INC.
             FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mike P. Kurtanjek, am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer of Avro Energy Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 16, 2010                  By: /s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Mike P. Kurtanjek
                                          Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                          acting Chief Financial Officer, acting
                                          Principal Accounting Officer and
                                          Director
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                          NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                        COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                        ------------------------------------------------
                                            1997              1996              1995
                                        ------------      ------------      ------------
<S>                                     <C>               <C>               <C>          
Net loss .............................  $(43,910,000)     $(22,981,000)     $(36,631,000)
                                        ============      ============      ============

Applicable common shares:
Weighted average shares outstanding
    during the period ................    26,692,000        26,029,000        23,374,000
                                        ============      ============      ============

Net loss per common share ............  $      (1.65)     $      (0.88)     $      (1.57)
                                        ============      ============      ============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Oldwebsites.com, Inc., (the “Company”)
on 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Richard
Ivanovick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








November
      16, 2009
            /s/
      Richard IvanovcikRichard
      IvanovickChief
      Financial Officer
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 1 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 2 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 3 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 4 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 5 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 6 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 7 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 8 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 9 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 10 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 11 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 12 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 13 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 14 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 15 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 16 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 17 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 18 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 19 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 20 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 21 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 22 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 23 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 24 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 25 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 26 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 27 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 28 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 29 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 30 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 31 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 32 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 33 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 34 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 35 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 36 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 37 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 38 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 39 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 40 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 41 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 42 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 43 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 44 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 45 of 46
Case 2:09-md-02042-SFC Document 174 Filed 09/21/10 Page 46 of 46
#### John C. Munro, Respondent, v. William Fults, Appellant.

Judgment of County Court and final order of justice of the peace reversed, with costs in this court and the courts below to the appellant. Held, that the record shows that upon the return of the precept and again before the issuance of the warrant the defendant tendered the full amount of rent unpaid (including all costs and disbursements), which the petitioner refused to accept, and the proceedings should *926have been dismissed *(Matter of Flewwellin*v. *Lent,*91 App. Div. 430); and also that no proper demand for rent was made by the petitioner. All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., and Kruse, J., who dissented.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 436

To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate between fats,

oils, and greases of animal, marine, or vegetable origin, and other oils

and greases, in issuing certain regulations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1995

Mr. EWING (for himself, and Mrs. DANNER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce and, in addition, to

the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require the head of any Federal agency to differentiate

between fats, oils, and greases of animal, marine, or

vegetable origin, and other oils and greases, in issuing

certain regulations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DIFFERENTIATION AMONG FATS, OILS, AND

4 GREASES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In issuing or enforcing any regu6 lation or establishing any interpretation or guideline relat-
2

•HR 436 IH

1 ing to a fat, oil, or grease under any Federal law, the head

2 of any Federal agency shall differentiate between—

3 (1)(A) animal fats and oils and greases, and

4 fish and marine mammal oils, within the meaning of

5 paragraph (2) of section 61(a) of title 13, United

6 States Code; or

7 (B) oils of vegetable origin, including oils from

8 the seeds, nuts, and kernels referred to in paragraph

9 (1)(A) of such section; and

10 (2) other oils and greases, including petroleum.

11 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—In differentiating between

12 the class of fats, oils, and greases described in subsection

13 (a)(1) and the class of oils and greases described in sub14 section (a)(2), the head of the Federal agency shall con15 sider differences in the physical, chemical, biological, and

16 other properties, and in the environmental effects, of the

17 classes.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 4, 2016

No. 04-16-00226-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Lauro Eduardo RUIZ,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4068

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s second motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order 

the brief due October 21, 2016. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Eric Alfonso Serrano, * From the Criminal District Court No.1

of Tarrant County,

Trial Court No. 1277220D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00051

- CR * March 12, 2015

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

t0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148750

RAYMOND STRUDGEON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148750

COA: 316965

MCAC: 12-000027

BURT WATSON CHEVROLET-PONTIAC,

L.L.C.,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2014 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Pervasive Software Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Pervasive Software Inc.



By:

/s/ David SikoraName: David SikoraTitle: Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/ John E. FarrName: John E. FarrTitle: Chief Financial Officer
#### L. M. HARPER v. Robert GLAZIER, Doing Business as Hammond Scrap Iron Co. et al.

No. 1509.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

June 14, 1935.

Robt. M. McGehee, of Hammond, for appellant.

Reid & Reid, of Hammond, for appellees.

LE BLANC, Judge.

The plaintiff sues the three defendants herein for damages for the alleged removal of certain personal property which he claims to own and which formerly comprised a sawmill, from a mill site at Robert in the parish of Tangipahoa. The value of each article is itemized in detail, the whole amounting to the sum of $2,310.

He prays for judgment in the said amount of $2,310, with 5 per cent, per an-num interest, against the three defendants in solido.

It is apparent that the demand is for an amount beyond that with which this court is vested with jurisdiction in a suit of this nature, and it is necessary, therefore, that the case be transferred to the Supreme Court.

For these reasons, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that, in accordance with the provisions of Act No. 19 of 1912, this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court of the state, within 30 days from the date on which this decree becomes final.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-37]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-37 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: August 5, 2008.

Patricia L. Toppings,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 47917)          ( print page 47918)          ( print page 47919)          ( print page 47920)          ( print page 47921)          ( print page 47922)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. E8-18651 Filed 8-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET FOR THE MONTH OF 

 APRIL, 2010, BEFORE THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN*

Listed below are the cases on this Court's trial docket for the month of April, 2010.

Counsel will be notified when their case reaches No. 5. After such notice, counsel should

be prepared to begin trial any time on 48 hours notice. It is counsel's responsibility in all

cases after they have been so notified to contact my clerk, Marilyn Orem, at 234-5147, to

ascertain the status of the trial docket. Unless otherwise notified, this Court commences

trial at 8:45 a.m. PLEASE BE PROMPT!

1. 09-11949 KAID V. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE

2. 08-12960 FOR MOTOR CO. V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

3. 09-10490 ALERIS ALUMINUM CANADA V. VALEO, INC.

4. 09-12106 WILLIAMS V. JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION, ET.AL

5. 09-11380 RIVIERA DISTRIBUTORS V. RDI OF MICHIGAN, LLC

6. 09-12003 TOOL-PLAS SYSTEMS V. CAMACO, LLC

7. 09-12782 HERRON V. WILSHIRE CREDIT CORP.

8. 09-11290 BRICKLAYERS PENSION TRUST V. EVERLAST MASONRY

9. 09-10860 TATANGELO V. MGM GRAND DETROIT, LLC

 

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: February 2, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on February 2, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

*PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT TRIAL WILL NOT BEGIN BEFORE THE FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE.

IF THERE IS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PENDING, FINAL PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE WILL BE RESCHEDULED APPROXIMATELY 7 DAYS AFTER ANY

DECISION ON SUCH MOTION.

2:09-cv-11949-PJD-MKM Doc # 19 Filed 02/02/10 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 89