alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CFO





I, Arthur J. Ayres, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MIGENIX Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.





|      |                   |                               |                        
|----- | ----------------- | ----------------------------- | -----------------------
|Date: | January 15, 2007  |                              
|      |                   | Arthur J. Ayres              
|By:   | Arthur J. Ayres |                               | Chief Financial Officer
|      |                   | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio Ruben LUJAN-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 72-1829.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 13, 1972.

*684Kevin J. Mclnerney (argued), of Mc-Inerney, Milchen & Frank, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Lyn I. Goldberg, Ásst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and TALBOT SMITH, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:

Lujan-Romero was convicted of having possessed a quantity of marijuana with the intention of distributing it, a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963.

At a border check point, located approximately fifty-six miles north of the Mexican-American border, the appellant’s automobile was stopped by agents authorized to search vehicles for concealed aliens. The trunk of the vehicle was opened and was seen to contain two foot lockers. The Government concedes that neither of the lockers was of sufficient size to conceal a human being. The Government’s agents opened the lockers and discovered the marijuana in question. Lujan-Romero’s motion to suppress the evidence was denied, apparently upon the basis of the Government’s argument that the two lockers, if opened at their ends and joined, would have then, together, contained sufficient space to conceal an alien. We cannot accept this argument. The record discloses that the investigating agents might have quite easily, without opening the lockers pushed them apart and ascertained whether or not they were in fact joined together. Our court has held that government agents of the authority such as those here involved are authorized to search only those portions of an automobile or its contents which are reasonably susceptible of concealing aliens. *See, e.g.,*Valenzuela-Garcia v. United States, 425 F.2d 1170 (9th Cir. 1970). The motion to suppress should have been granted. The judgment of conviction is vacated, and upon remand, the indictment will be dismissed.

Reversed, with directions.

1

. The Honorable Talbot Smith, United States District Judge, Detroit, Michigan, sitting by-designation.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mIniteb**~tate5'** 

# qcourtof**~eaI5'** 

# fortbe jf

# eberaI qcircuit
IN RE ANTHONY JEREMIAH BAYNE 2012-1640 (Serial No. 11/871,992) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board ofPatent Appeals and Interferences. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office moves for an extension oftime, until January 11, 2013, to file his principal brief. Anthony Jeremiah Bayne opposes. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-1640 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 11/29/2012IN RE ANTHONY BAYNE The motion is granted.

s27 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 12-1640 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 11/29/2012
|   | (1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Extreme Home Staging,      Inc.  for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2)      the information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of      Extreme Home Staging, Inc.  for the quarter ended December 31,      2009  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial      condition and results of operations of Extreme Home Staging,      Inc.                                   |

|                                   |                                                          |                       |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                                   | EXTREME      HOME STAGING, INC.                               |
|                                   |                                                          |                       |
| Date:  February      8, 2010 | By:                                                           | /s/ Milka      Fixler |
|                                   | Milka      Fixler                                             |
|                                   | Chief      Executive Officer                                  |
|                                   | (principal      executive officer and duly authorizedofficer) |

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 526

To amend title 49, United States Code, to relieve farmers and retail farm

suppliers from limitations on maximum driving and on-duty time in

the transportation of agricultural commodities or farm supplies if such

transportation occurs within a 100-air mile radius of the source of

the commodities or the distribution point for the farm supplies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 17, 1995

Mr. BEREUTER (for himself and Mr. LAUGHLIN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to relieve farmers

and retail farm suppliers from limitations on maximum

driving and on-duty time in the transportation of agricultural commodities or farm supplies if such transportation

occurs within a 100-air mile radius of the source of

the commodities or the distribution point for the farm

supplies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 526 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FOR FARMERS AND FARM SUPPLI2 ERS FROM TRANSPORTATION LIMITATIONS

3 ON MAXIMUM DRIVING AND ON-DUTY TIME.

4 (a) EXCEPTION FOR FARMERS AND FARM SUPPLI5 ERS.—Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Trans6 portation under section 31502 of title 49, United States

7 Code, regarding maximum driving and on-duty time for

8 drivers used by motor carriers shall not apply to farmers

9 or retail farm suppliers transporting agricultural commod10 ities or farm supplies for agricultural purposes if such

11 transportation is limited to an area within a 100-air mile

12 radius of the source of the commodities or the distribution

13 point for the farm supplies.

14 (b) CONFORMING REGULATIONS.—The Secretary

15 shall amend part 395 of title 49, Code of Federal Regula16 tions, to reflect the exception provided by subsection (a).

Æ
Exhibit 7

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this amendment no. 1
to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited of our report dated March 9, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting which appears in this Annual Report.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (File Nos. 333-165730, 333-168835 and 333-170873) of our report referred to above. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Interests of Experts
in the Annual Information Form filed as Exhibit 1 attached to this amendment no. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                    
|Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
|Toronto, Ontario                                  
|March 9, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 466 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 466

  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire and to convey 
    certain lands or interests in lands to improve the management, 
 protection, and administration of Colonial National Historical Park, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 1995

 Mr. Bateman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire and to convey 
    certain lands or interests in lands to improve the management, 
 protection, and administration of Colonial National Historical Park, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. The Secretary of the Interior is hereby authorized to 
grant within the County of York, Virginia, perpetual easements, or a 
fee simple interest in land, including any improvements of structures, 
to the County of York, Virginia, without any reimbursement, charge or 
fee, subject to such conditions as are determined by the Secretary to 
be necessary for the protection of Federal interests, for rights-of-way 
through, over, or under the lands of Colonial National Historical Park, 
now or hereafter acquired, for the purposes of operating sewage-
disposal systems.
    Sec. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Act of June 28, 1938 
(52 Stat. 1208, 16 U.S.C. 81b et seq.), limiting the average width of 
the Colonial Parkway, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 
include within the boundaries of Colonial National Historical Park and 
acquire by donation, exchange, or purchase with donated or appropriated 
funds, the lands or interests in lands described as lots 30 to 48, 
inclusive, that portion of lot 49 that is 200 feet in width from the 
existing boundary of Colonial National Historical Park, and a 3.2 acre 
archaeological site, as shown on the plats titled ``Page Landing At 
Jamestown being a subdivision of property of Neck O Land Limited 
Partnership'' dated June 21, 1989, Sheets 2 and 3 of 3 sheets and 
bearing National Park Service Drawing Number 333.80031., and all or a 
portion of the adjoining lot number 11 of the Neck O Land Hundred 
Subdivision, with or without improvements.
    Sec. 3. There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AUTOLIV, INC. 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY 

Effective January 1, 2014 
 The following shall
remain in effect until changed by the Board: 
  

					
	 Annual Base Retainer*
	  			
	 All Non-Employee Directors other than Chairman
	  	 	$220,000	  
	 Chairman
	  	 	$390,000	  
	 Lead Director Annual Supplemental Retainer
	  	 	$25,000	  
	 Committee Chair Annual Supplemental Retainers
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	 	$20,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	 	$20,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	 	$10,000	  
	 Compliance Committee
	  	 	Discretionary, decided annually	  

  

	*	The Annual Base Retainer will be paid in arrears, as follows: 

 Two-thirds (2/3) of the applicable Annual Base
Retainer will be paid in cash (the “Cash Payment”). The Cash Payment will be split and paid in two equal payments in each calendar year (each date a “Cash Payment Date”), and will be prorated using the Proration
Factor (as defined below). 
 Subject to share availability under the Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as the same may be amended from time to time
(the “Plan”), one-third (1/3) of the applicable Annual Base Retainer will be paid in the form of fully-vested shares of Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) (the “Annual Stock Grant”) on the date in each calendar
year when the Company grants its annual incentives for employees for the coming year (the “Grant Date”, typically in February). The number of shares in the Annual Stock Grant will be determined by multiplying the Proration Factor
(as defined below) by the amount determined by (A) dividing the amount that is one-third (1/3) of the applicable Annual Base Retainer by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) of the Common Stock on the Grant Date, and (B) rounding to the
nearest whole number. The Annual Stock Grants will be granted under, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the Plan. 
 The “Proration
Factor” is a fraction, (a) the numerator of which is the number of full months of service as a non-employee director during, as applicable, (i) the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year of the Grant Date or (ii) the 6 month
period immediately preceding the 6 month period of the Cash Payment Date and (b) the denominator of which is, as applicable, (i) 12, as to the Annual Stock Grant or (ii) 6, as to the Cash Payment. 

Non-employee directors are required to hold shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to the Annual Stock Grants until he or she has met the ownership
requirements set forth in the Autoliv, Inc. Stock Ownership Policy for Non-Employee Directors.
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 4 Filed 08/19/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 4 Filed 08/19/2009 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationOKSB Statutory Trust I
    
    ConnecticutSBI Capital Trust II
    
    DelawareSouthwest Capital Trust II
    
    DelawareBusiness Consulting Group, Inc.
    
    OklahomaHealthcare Strategic Support, Inc.
    
    OklahomaBank of Kansas
    
    KansasStillwater National Bank & Trust Company
    
    United StatesCash Source, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaCRK Properties, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaSWB, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaSNB Insurance Agency, Inc. *
    
    OklahomaSNB Real Estate Holdings, Inc. *
    
    DelawareStillwater National Building Corporation*
    
    OklahomaBNS, Inc.**
    
    OklahomaCRK Technologies, LLC **
    
    OklahomaSNB REIT, Inc.***
    
    DelawareStillwater Properties, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaGrand Hill Investments, LLC****
    
    Oklahoma
 
 *
    
    Direct subsidiary of Stillwater National Bank & Trust Company.**
    
    Direct subsidiary of CRK Properties, Inc.***
    
    Direct subsidiary of SNB Real Estate Holdings, Inc.****
    
    Direct subsidiary of Stillwater Properties, Inc.
#### Electro-Tint Engraving Company, Appellant, v. American Handkerchief Company, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 485

To expand the authority for the export of devices.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 11, 1995

Mr. KIM (for himself, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. ROYCE, and Mrs. SEASTRAND) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce and, in addition, to the Committee on International Relations, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To expand the authority for the export of devices.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In the administration of section

5 801(e)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

6 (21 U.S.C. 381(e)(2)), on the basis of either of the follow7 ing notices with respect to a medical device the Secretary

8 of Health and Human Services shall make the determina9 tion in that section that the exportation of such medical

10 device is not contrary to public health and safety and has
2

•HR 485 IH

1 the approval of the country to which it is intended for ex2 port:

3 (1) Notice by the exporting company of ap4 proval for marketing or for investigational use of the

5 medical device in the European Community (such

6 approval for marketing referred to as the ‘‘CE’’

7 mark).

8 (2) Notice by the exporting company of ap9 proval for marketing or investigational use of the

10 medical device by the Ministry of Health and Wel11 fare of Japan or by another appropriate body in the

12 government of Japan.

13 In the case of a medical device approved only for investiga14 tional use, this subsection shall not apply unless the initial

15 destination country has also specifically approved such

16 medical device for investigational use.

17 (b) APPLICATION.—Subsection (a) does not apply to

18 any medical device which has been banned by the Sec19 retary of Health and Human Services under section 516

20 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.

21 360f).

Æ
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s), CASE NUMBER: 09-20223

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

v.

WILLIAM REEVES, 

Defendant(s).

 / 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL

On April 2, 2010, Defendant William Reeves was found guilty of: (1) Health Care

Fraud Conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1349; and (2) Conspiracy to Pay and

Receive Health Care Kickbacks, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §371.

Before the Court is Reeves’ “Amended Motion for New Trial.” (Doc. 166). 

Reeves says the Court erred by allowing the Government to impeach him with his

eleven-year-old prior State conviction for conspiracy to deliver cocaine. 

Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33(a), “Upon the defendant’s motion, the court may

vacate any judgment and grant a new trial if the interest of justice so requires.” 

“[G]ranting or refusing to grant such motions rests within the sound discretion of the

District Court and its action must stand in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of

discretion.” United States v. Hoffa, 382 F.2d 856, 862 (6th Cir. 1967) (citations omitted). 

The burden is on Reeves to prove that a new trial is warranted. See United States v.

Davis, 15 F.3d 526, 531 (6th Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. Seago, 930 F.2d 482,
2

488 (6th Cir. 1991)).

When deciding a Rule 33 motion, the Court must balance the alleged error

against the record as a whole and evaluate the fairness of the trial. See United States

v. Bustamante, 1992 WL 192545 at *1 (6th Cir. Aug. 12, 1992) (citing United States v.

McBride, 862 F.2d 1316, 1319 (8th Cir. 1988); Bruner v. Dunaway, 684 F.2d 422, 425

(6th Cir. 1982)).

Reeves’ prior conviction was not admitted in error; he put his “helping” character

trait at issue, and the Court concluded that his conviction for conspiracy to deliver

cocaine related to that character trait. Even if there was an abuse of discretion, the trial

record as a whole contains sufficient evidence of Reeves’ guilt for a jury to return a

guilty verdict. Neither Reeves’ trial nor the jury’s verdict was a miscarriage of justice.

Reeves’ motion for a new trial is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED.

s/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: July 6, 2010

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

July 6, 2010.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk