alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 5- 27 53

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Mat th ew Pau l Ca sa s
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - J op li n

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Feb ru ary 3, 2 01 6 Fi le d: Feb ru ary 5, 2 01 6 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Mat th ew Pau l Cas as di rectl y ap pe als th e se nt en ce im po se d by th e di st ric t co ur t 1 aft er he pl ed gu il ty to di st rib ut in g an d po ss es si ng ch il d po rn og rap hy. His co un se l ha s

The Hon or ab le St ep h e n R

. Bo ug h, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e 1 W es te rnDis tri ctof M is so ur i.m ov ed to wit hd raw an d fil ed a br ie f un de r Ander s v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 73 8 (1 96 7) , arg ui ng th at th e se nt en ce was un reas on ab l e
. Hav in g juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 1 29 1, t hi s co ur t d is m is se s t he ap pe al

.
C a s a s ’s ap pe al waiv er sh ou ld be en fo rced an d pr ev en ts co ns id erat io n of h i s cl ai m
. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Sc ot t , 62 7 F.3 d 70 2, 70 4 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ) (d e no vo rev ie w of va li di ty an d ap pl ic ab il it y of ap pe al waiv er); Uni te d St at es v. And is , 33 3 F.3 d 88 6, 88 9- 90 (8 th Ci r. 20 03 ) (en b a n c ) (co ur t sh ou ld en fo rce ap pe al waiv er an d di sm is s ap pe al whe re it fal ls wit hi n sc op e of waiv er, pl ea ag reem en t an d waiv er were en te red in to kn owi ng ly an d vo lu nt ari ly, an d no m is carr ia g e of jus ti ce wou ld res ul t). An in de pe nd en t rev ie w of th e reco rd un de r Pen so n v. Ohi o , 48 8 U.S. 75 (1 98 8) , rev eal s
no no nf riv ol ou s i ss ue s fo r ap pe al

.
The ap pe al is di sm is se d a nd co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is gra nt ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee (#13883) meeting: 

*Date and Time:*                         February 11-12, 2008, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 1235, Stafford I Building, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual interest and concern to the agencies.                     

*Agenda:*                         To hear presentations of current programming by representatives from NSF, NASA, DOE and other agencies relevant to astronomy and astrophysics; to discuss current and potential areas of cooperation between the agencies; to formulate recommendations for continued and new areas of cooperation and mechanisms for achieving them.                     

*Reason for Late Notice:*                         Scheduling conflicts and staff travel prevented the meeting notice to be posted earlier.                    

Dated: January 29, 2008. 

Susanne E. Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E8-1837 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### ST. VILLE v. KIRKLAND.

No. 14639.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Oct. 16, 1933.

Hugh M. Wilkinson, A. Miles Coe, Fred W. Oser, and Harry Nowalsky, all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Gerald Netter, of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

Joseph M. St. Ville, a negro railway mail clerk, was injured on September 7,1931, while a passenger in an automobile driven by Thompson Kirkland. We have previously held in two other cases growing out of the same accident that Kirkland was responsible for the accident. See Gautier v. Kirkland (La. App.) 145 So. 59; St. Ville et al. v. Kirkland (La. App.) 147 So. 549. The issue presented here is merely one of quantum.

Plaintiff’claims $2,043.50,' and the ■ lower court awarded him $513.

Plaintiff sustained a strain of the neck muscles which caused him some pain and discomfort for a period of six days, during which time he was treated by a doctor by the name of Florence C. Haydel who charged St. Ville ■ $22 .for four visits, or $5.50 a visit. St. Ville was not at any time confined to his bed, and we cannot characterize his injury as serious. He lost a pair of eyeglasses which cost him $14 to replace, and for which he claims $16.50, the cost price. His claim for loss of wages is not sustained by the record; the evidence being to the effect that he is paid by the month, no deduction being made for his absence from the government service, six days being simply deducted from a ten-day annual allowance for sick leave.

For St. Ville’s physical injuries, his eyeglasses and his medical expense, we are of opinion without itemizing them that $250 would be sufficient. The judgment appealed from will therefore be reduced to that amount.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is amended by reducing the amount awarded plaintiff from $513 to $250, and, as thus amended, it is affirmed. ■

Amended and affirmed.
#### Nicholas J. CURTIS, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. UTAH FUEL CO., Defendant.

No. 6468.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 15, 1938.

Nicholas J. Curtis, in pro. per.

H. Colin Minton, Jr., of Trenton, N. J., for defendant.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and BIGGS, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, on a motion to strike, the judge held:

“The whole complaint is prolix, verbose, and incoherent. Making all due allowance for the fact that the plaintiff is not a member of any bar (although he subscribes himself a bachelor of laws) the document on its face fails to disclose any cause of action against the defendant herein.

“The motion to strike it out will be granted.”

Examination of the record satisfies us the court was right in so holding. We may further add that the papers filed fail to comply with the statutory requirements where a contention of bias and prejudice is made against a judge.

So regarding, the order sustaining the motion to strike is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Oryx Technology Corp. (the "Company") on
Form  10-KSB/A  for the  period  ending  February  28,  2002 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Philip
J. Micciche, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Philip J. Micciche
----------------------

Philip J. Micciche
Chief Executive Officer
And Chief Financial Officer

May 22, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18303]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Blue Ribbon Panel on VA-Medical School Affiliations; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Blue Ribbon Panel 
on VA-Medical School Affiliations has scheduled a meeting for September 
11, 2008, in Room 542 at 1800 G Street, NW., Washington, DC. The 
meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and will end at 2 p.m. The meeting is 
open to the public.
    The purpose of the Panel is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs, through the Under Secretary for Health, on issues related to a 
comprehensive philosophical framework to enhance VA's partnerships with 
medical schools and affiliated institutions.
    At the September 11 meeting, members of the Panel will discuss 
results of recent surveys on VA's current affiliations with medical 
schools and their implications for the future.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the 
Panel. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, 
depending on the number of participants. Requests to address the Panel 
should be sent by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b0c272439222a65032427272a252f0b3d2a652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b3f4dfdcc1dad29dfbdcdfdfd2ddd7f3c5d29dd4dcc5">[email protected]</span></a>. Interested parties 
may also provide written comments for review by the Panel prior to the 
meeting or at any time, by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#21664d4e5348400f694e4d4d404f456157400f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aaedc6c5d8c3cb84e2c5c6c6cbc4ceeadccb84cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail 
to Gloria J. Holland, Ph.D., Special Assistant for Policy and Planning 
to the Chief Academic Affiliations Officer, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW 
(14), Washington, DC 20420.

    By Direction of the Secretary.

    Dated: August 4, 2008.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-18303 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Sona Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine  months ended June 30, 2010 and for the period from January 18, 2007 (date of inception) to June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Monika Sagar, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 July 15, 2010                                                                  MONIKA SAGAR
 Monika Sagar
 Chief Accounting Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 -1-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-20025

D-4, SAMUEL L. RIDDLE, JR., HONORABLE AVERN COHN

Defendant.

___________________________________/

MEMORANDUM REGARDING CONFLICT OF INTEREST

This is a criminal case (Detroit Case). Defendant is charged with a multitude of

offenses. Defendant went to trial on the charges. The jury could not agree. The Court

declared a mistrial. Defendant’s counsel in the case were permitted to withdraw. A

retrial is scheduled to begin in early July. Defendant has retained new counsel in the

person of attorney Richard Convertino (Convertino).

Defendant is also scheduled to go to trial in an unrelated case in early June on

charges of conspiracy to commit bribery (Southfield Case). In this case, there is a codefendant, Mary Waters. She is represented by Convertino. Defendant is represented

by attorney John McManus.

As a consequence of Convertino’s representation of Waters, the government

filed a motion in both the Detroit Case and the Southfield Case styled

Government’s Motion for Hearing Regarding Conflicts of

Interest and Possible Attorney Disqualification

The Court and the judge assigned to the Southfield Case held a joint hearing on

the government’s motion, at which they inquired in detail into the potential conflict

flowing from Convertino representing defendant in the Detroit Case and Waters in the
2

Southfield Case. A redacted transcript of the hearing has been docketed (Doc. No.

170).

The government acknowledges that to the extent there is a conflict of interest in

Convertino representing Waters in the Southfield Case, Water has validly waived any

conflict. The government, however, says this is not so in the Detroit Case because, in

the government’s view, defendant has not properly waived any conflict. The

government is wrong.

The Court is satisfied that defendant is knowledgeable and fully informed as to

the potential conflict of interest occasioned by Convertino’s representation of Waters in

the Southfield Case and Convertino’s representation of him in the Detroit Case. The

Court is also satisfied that the totality of the record shows defendant has voluntarily,

knowingly and intelligently waived the potential conflict of interest.

As stated in United States v. Reese, 699 F.2d 803, 805 (6th Cir. 1983):

[E]ven if an actual conflict of interests or a strong likelihood

of conflict is demonstrated the defendant must be given an

opportunity to waive his constitutional right to conflict-free

representation. A voluntary waiver of this constitutional right,

knowingly and intelligently made, must be honored by the

court in the absence of compelling circumstances.

Defendant has had the opportunity to waive his constitutional right to conflict-free

representation and has done so. There are no compelling circumstances to cause the

Court to reject the waiver. Convertino may represent defendant in the Detroit Case.

Dated: April 5, 2010 S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### STATE of Missouri and Darlene Carrawell, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Benjamin ISOM, Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 69969, 70038.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Jan. 28, 1997.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 5, 1997.

John P. Dockery, Jr., Michael W. Shelton, St. Louis, for petitioners/appellants.

Barbara Nangle, Bruce Nangle, St. Louis, for respondent/cross-appellant.

Before AHRENS, C.J., and CRANDALL and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother and state appeal the order in a paternity action contending the trial court erred in failing to award retroactive child support. Respondent cross-appeals asserting that the current child support order was not supported by competent evidence nor was a Form 14 introduced into evidence. *299Respondent also appeals the trial court’s order requiring him to pay the cost of the blood tests. We affirm.

Appellants did not meet their burden of proof under the Uniform Parentage Act for retroactive child support. There was also competent evidence in front of the trial court to support the current child support award. *Glenn v. Francis,*864 S.W.2d 947 (Mo.App.1993).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find no error. Since an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### N. B. EARLY, Jr., Collector of Internal Revenue for the Collection District of Virginia, as Successor in Office to R. C. L. Moncure, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. PETERSBURG SAVINGS & AMERICAN TRUST COMPANY, as Successor of Petersburg Savings & Trust Company, Appellee.

No. 4315.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1938.

Sterling Hutcheson, U. S. Atty., and John V. Cogbill, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Richmond, Va., for appellant.

H. C. Kilpatrick, of Washington, D. C., and Oliver A. Pollard, of Petersburg, Va., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Case dismissed under rule 20 in accordance with agreement of counsel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,164
<SECURITIES>                                    39,238
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                       450
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   510
<PP&E>                                           4,086
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,937
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,053
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,371)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,682
<SALES>                                         33,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,481
<CGS>                                            1,668
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,611
<INCOME-TAX>                                       532
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,079
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,079
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
#### Tilly Schnurr, Appellant, v. Alexander Quinn, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         640,299                   3,417
<SECURITIES>                                        75                  25,442
<RECEIVABLES>                                  360,783                 217,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               429,652                 416,945
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,036,700               1,364,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,966                 532,440
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    530,000                 530,000
<COMMON>                                     9,682,451               7,362,318
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,036,700               1,364,297
<SALES>                                      1,295,159               1,161,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                          746,285                 763,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (782,539)               (539,951)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               129,529                  98,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (912,068)               (638,553)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (912,068)               (638,553)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0




</TABLE>