alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp. III
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Marlene Krauss, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
                    /s/ Marlene Krauss, M.D.
                    Dated:
      May 8, 2009Marlene
      Krauss, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
ACCEPTED 01-15-00110-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/11/2015 2:37:38 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




I, Carl
Oberg, Chief Financial Officer of Classic Costume Company, Inc.,  (the
“Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based
on my knowledge:




(1)    the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:
August 18, 2008




/s/
      Carl Oberg
              Carl
      ObergChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.2
 
 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BLS Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Gary
Prager, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
BLS Media, Inc., and will be retained by BLS Media, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/ Gary
      PragerGary Prager
                  Chief Financial
      Officer
                  May
      15, 2009
Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8  (No.  333-68801,  No.333-62767,  No.  333-85556,  No.
333-07409,  and No.  333-13887) and in the  Registration  Statements on Form S-3
(No.  333-63991,  No.  333-11391,  No.  333-23317  and  No.  333-63891)  of Oryx
Technology  Corp.  of our report  dated May 28, 2004  relating to the  financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
--------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
May 28, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47143-47144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18665]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1336-000]


Energy Systems North East, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 6, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Energy Systems North East, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 26, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 47144]]

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#793f3c2b3a36171510171c2a0c0909160b0d391f1c0b1a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50161502131f3e3c393e35032520203f222410363522337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>. or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18665 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Frank E. Smith, Appellant, v. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Essex, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM SHORT,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHERIFF DAN HINES, SGT. WALKER,

LT. CARMONEY, OFFICER WICKHAM,

OFFICER BRITTIN, OFFICER WELTER,

OFFICER KELLENBERGER, RHONDA

SCHULTZ, NANCY YIRKU, JACKIE

COX, MICHAEL BURGESS, CARRIE

DASH, COORDINATED CARE PLLC, and

JOHN DOE,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-12323

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

OPINION AND ORDER

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District 

of Michigan, on July 15, 2011.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On June 16, 2009, William Short (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner currently incarcerated

at the Carson City Correctional Facility, in Carson City, Michigan, filed this pro se civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has referred this action to

Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub for all pretrial proceedings.

On May 27, 2011, Magistrate Judge Majzoub filed a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”), recommending that this Court dismiss Defendant Welter from this suit pursuant

2:09-cv-12323-PJD-MKM Doc # 67 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 752
2

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) because Plaintiff has failed to serve Welter within

120 days of filing the Complaint. Magistrate Judge Majzoub also noted that Plaintiff was

granted an extension of this time and still had not served Welter. At the conclusion of the

R&R, Magistrate Judge Majzoub advises the parties that they may object and seek review

of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. R&R 2. She further advises that

“[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal.” Id.

(citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466 (1985); Howard v. Sec’y of Health &

Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th

Cir. 1981)). No objections to the R&R have been filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached

by Magistrate Judge Majzoub.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Welter is DISMISSED from this action without

prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Attorneys of Record

William Short, #195405

Carson City Correctional Facility

10274 Boyer Road

Carson City, MI 48811

Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub

2:09-cv-12323-PJD-MKM Doc # 67 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 753
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 31, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00051

- CV

Hong Kong Dajiang Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., Appellant

v.

Colin Guinn, individually and on behalf of Dajiang North America, LLC; and Dajiang North America, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON A ND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on January 22, 2014. The

appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court

agrees that the motion s hould be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses

the appeal

. E ach party shall bear their own costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in

the court below

, and this decision shall be certified below for observance.
EXHIBIT
32











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL


OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Hugh Downing, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Suncross Exploration Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Suncross Exploration Corporation





Date:  May
14, 2008





By:/s/ Hugh
Downing


Hugh
Downing,


Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and


Principal
Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Indigenous Global Development
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Deni Leonard, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Deni Leonard
-------------------------------------
Deni Leonard
CEO and CFO
October 30, 2003
AO 247 (Rev. 11/11) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Eastern District of Michigan

United States of America

)

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Case No:

USM No:

Date of Original Judgment:

Date of Previous Amended Judgment:

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of u the defendant u the Director of the Bureau of Prisons u the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

u DENIED. u GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date:

Judge’s signature

Effective Date:

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

SCOTT GRANGER SAMONEK 09-20225-1

43245-039

11/9/2010

Pro Se

✔

✔

11/9/2010

April 20, 2016 s/Robert H. Cleland

Robert H. Cleland, U.S. District Judge

2:09-cr-20225-RHC-PJK Doc # 62 Filed 04/26/16 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 501
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines o f law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 30 2003 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
ELEAZAR SOLIS, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. T. C. PETERSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. No. 02-6225 D.C. No. CIV-02-169-C (W.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before EBEL , LUCERO and O’BRIEN , Circuit Judges. Eleazar Solis, an inmate at the Federal Correction Institute in El Reno, Oklahoma, filed a petition for habeas corpus pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma . Solis wishes to retroactively challenge his sentence in light of the United State s Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).- 2 -

The district court construed Solis’s petition as a § 2255 petition and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction. Petitions f iled under § 2255 must be filed in the district court where the petitioner was sentenc ed. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Although Petitioner was sentenced in the Western Di strict of Michigan, this petition was filed in the Western District of Oklah oma. For substantially the same reasons as stated by the district court in its Order of June 6, 2002, dismissing the appeal, we DENY a certificate of app ealability and AFFIRM the dismissal.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
David M. Ebel Circuit Judge
Exhibit 4.2 


   


 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 


   






 We have issued our report dated February 13, 2020, with
respect to the financial statement of m+ funds Trust, Series 6-4 contained in Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-6 (File No. 333-235760) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm”. 


   


   


 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 


   


 Chicago, Illinois 


 February 13, 2020
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 608

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the filing deadline for

certain claims under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 20, 1995

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself and Mr. HILLIARD) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the filing

deadline for certain claims under the National Vaccine

Injury Compensation Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vaccine Injury

5 Compensation Reform Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

7 The purpose of this Act is to prevent the unfair denial

8 of compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Com9 pensation Program to certain individuals who are diag10 nosed as having vaccine-related injuries more than 36
2

•HR 608 IH

1 months after the first symptom, manifestation of onset,

2 or significant aggravation of such injuries.

3 SEC. 3. REVISION OF FILING DEADLINE FOR CERTAIN

4 CLAIMS UNDER NATIONAL VACCINE INJURY

5 COMPENSATION PROGRAM.

6 Section 2116(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act

7 (42 U.S.C. 300aa–16(a)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘no

8 petition’’ and all that follows and inserting the following:

9 ‘‘no petition may be filed for compensation under the Pro10 gram for such injury after the expiration of 36 months

11 after the date on which such injury is diagnosed, except

12 that, if such injury is first diagnosed before the date of

13 the enactment of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Re14 form Act, no petition may be filed for compensation under

15 the Program for such injury after the expiration of 36

16 months after the latest of—

17 ‘‘(A) the date on which such injury is diag18 nosed;

19 ‘‘(B) the date of the occurrence of the first

20 symptom or manifestation of onset or of the

21 significant aggravation of such injury; and

22 ‘‘(C) the date of the enactment of the Vac23 cine Injury Compensation Reform Act, if such

24 injury is first diagnosed after the expiration of
3

•HR 608 IH

1 36 months after the date referred to in sub2 paragraph (B); and’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 415 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 415

               For the relief of Gerald Albert Carriere.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Hamilton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               For the relief of Gerald Albert Carriere.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER FOR GERALD ALBERT CARRIERE OF GROUNDS FOR 
              INELIGIBILITY TO BECOME CITIZEN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 315 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Gerald Albert Carriere may not be considered 
permanently ineligible to become a citizen of the United States on the 
basis that, prior to August 1, 1966, he--
            (1) applied for exemption or discharge from training or 
        service in the Marine Corps of the United States on the ground 
        that he is an alien; or
            (2) was relieved or discharged from such training or 
        service on such ground.
    (b) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) 
shall apply only if Gerald Albert Carriere applies for a visa or for a 
change or adjustment of status and pays the appropriate fees within 2 
years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### WICKES v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.

No. 16417

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 22, 1936.

Jas. G. Schillin, of New Orleans, for appellant.

John T. Charbonnet, of New Orleans, for appellee.

JANVIER, Judge.

This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal taken by appellant on the ground that an appellant may not appeal suspensively under Act No. 156 of 1912 as amended by Act No. 260 of 1918, commonly known as the “pauper act.”

Appellant, plaintiff in the court below, brought suit on a policy of insurance against defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. That company answered admitting its liability to the proper person, but contended that demand had also been made upon it by the administratrix of the estate of the insured and that it could not safely undertake to determine which of the said claimants was entitled to the proceeds. It thereupon deposited the proceeds of the policy in the registry of the court and cited the rival claimants to appear and present their respective claims.

The plaintiff, who is now appellant, had, as we have said, proceeded in forma pau-peris, under the statutes referred to, and when judgment was rendered in favor of the rival claimants and against her she obtained an order for suspensive and devolu-tive appeals without the furnishing of bond.

The motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal must be overruled for the reasons given in State ex rel. Messina v. Cage (La.App.) 152 So. 399. There we held that a party who is entitled to the relief afforded by the said acts may, without the furnishing of bond, appeal suspensively as well as devolutively where the controversy arises over claims to a fund which is in the custody of the court.-

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the motion to dismiss the appeal be, and it is, overruled at the cost of appellee.

Motion denied.