alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4136 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4136

  To provide for a reduced rate of postage for certain mailings that, 
     under Federal or State law, are required to be made by local 
                              governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 1996

 Mr. McIntosh (for himself, Mr. Condit, Mr. Goodlatte, and Mr. Davis) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a reduced rate of postage for certain mailings that, 
     under Federal or State law, are required to be made by local 
                              governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCED RATE OF POSTAGE.

    The United States Postal Service shall establish a discount presort 
first-class postage rate for specified local governmental mailings--
            (1) that are mandated by Federal or State law, such as 
        property tax statements, summonses, and jury-duty pay; but
            (2) for which no Federal or State funds are provided to 
        local governments to defray the associated administrative 
        costs.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated March 11, 2008 and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on March 19, 2008 (73 FR 14841), Varian, Inc., Lake Forest, 25200 Commercentre Drive, Lake Forest, California 92630-8810, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedule II: Drug
SchedulePhencyclidine (7471)
II1-Piperidinocyclohexane-carbonitrile (8603)
IIBenzoylecgonine (9180)
II
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances for use in diagnostic products. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Varian, Inc. to manufacture the listed 
                    ( print page 45789)
                    basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Varian, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: July 30, 2008. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E8-18042 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### United States Exchange Bank, Respondent, v. Julius Jonson’s Sons and Julius Jonson, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ariah Curtiss MINNIFIELD, Appellant.

No. 72-2181.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1972.

*683Mclnerney, Milchen & Frank and Kevin J. Mclnerney (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

E. MacAmos, Jr., Asst. ‘ U. S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Otto K.. Skepil, Jr., United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant drove an automobile through the customs barrier at the port of entry at San Ysidro, California, and fled the scene when directed to proceed to the secondary inspection area. His abandoned automobile was later found to contain marijuana residues. He appeals from a conviction under 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960 and 963, of conspiracy and illegal importation of a controlled substance.

Of the numerous assignments of error, the only one that requires discussion concerns the latitude of the cross-examination of a character witness. The prosecutor asked a witness who had known appellant only eighteen months if he was “aware that” appellant had been arrested in 1961 for armed robbery. The question was objected to as too remote, and prejudicial as to form.

Although the procedures recommended in Michelson v. United States, 335 U.S. 469, 484-485, 69 S.Ct. 213, 93 L.Ed. 168 (1948), were not followed literally, the appellant’s rights were protected by the district judge’s inquiry of the prosecutor in chambers and by appropriate limiting instructions.

Affirmed.
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 09/11/09 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 09/11/09 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 09/11/09 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 09/11/09 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 09/11/09 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 09/11/09 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 09/11/09 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 09/11/09 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 09/11/09 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 09/11/09 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 09/11/09 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 09/11/09 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.13 Filed 09/11/09 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 09/11/09 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.15 Filed 09/11/09 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:09-cv-13594-PJD-MJH ECF No. 1, PageID.16 Filed 09/11/09 Page 16 of 16
EXHIBIT NO. 23.1







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of GS
Financial  Products U.S., L.P. (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File No.  33-99948),
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on December 1, 1995, of our
report dated  January 22, 1998 on our audits of the  financial  statements of GS
Financial  Products U.S., L.P. as of November 29, 1996 and November 28, 1997 and
for the fiscal years ended November 24, 1995, November 29, 1996 and November 28,
1997, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



New York, New York
February 26, 1998.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18525]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1776-DR]


Kansas; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas (FEMA-1776-DR), dated July 9, 2008, and related 
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 4, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Kansas is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of July 9, 2008.

    Elk, Haskell, Reno, and Wilson Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-18525 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
#### Ephraim Englund, Respondent, v. The Town of Westmoreland, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
#### MARVEL CARBURETOR COMPANY, a corporation, and Charles H. Kirby, Appellants, v. William ROWERDINK and Harmon Rowerdink, Doing Business under the Assumed Name of Electric Service Station, and Bendix Products Corporation, Appellees.

No. 7472.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 8, 1938.

Rice & Rice, of Grand Rapids, Mich., and Carton, Gault & Davison, of Flint, Mich., for appellants.

Liverance & Van Antwerp, of Grand Rapids, Mich., and Brown, Jackson, Boettcher & Dienner, of Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decree below is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge.

Decree affirmed.
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Sona
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and
for the period from January 18, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Monika Sagar, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








February
3 , 2010   
                                             MONIKA
SAGAR


Monika
Sagar


Chief
Accounting Officer,


Chief
Financial Officer and Director











-1-
#### ART METAL WORKS, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL SILVER CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 251.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 4, 1938.

Ward, Crosby & Neal, of New York City (Kenneth S. Neal, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

John P. Chandler, of New York City, for appellee.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Nat Lewis Purses v. Carole Bags, 2 Cir., 83 F.2d 475, and Berlinger v. Busch Jewelry Co., 2 Cir., 48 F.2d 812.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 527 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 527

   To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to permit an extension for filing 
   drawback claims in cases where the President has declared a major 
                               disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 1995

  Mr. Berman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to permit an extension for filing 
   drawback claims in cases where the President has declared a major 
                               disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE FOR EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING DRAWBACK CLAIMS.

    Section 313(r) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313(r)), is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3)(A) Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in 
        paragraph (1), the Customs Service may extend the time for 
        filing a drawback claim for a period not to exceed 18 months, 
        if--
                    ``(i) the claimant establishes to the satisfaction 
                of the Customs Service that the claimant was unable to 
                file the drawback claim because of an event declared by 
                the President to be a major disaster on or after 
                January 1, 1994; and
                    ``(ii) the claimant files a request for such 
                extension with the Customs Service within 1 year from 
                the last day of the 3-year period referred to in 
                paragraph (1).
            ``(B) If an extension is granted with respect to a request 
        filed under this paragraph, the periods of time for retaining 
        records set forth in subsection (t) of this section and section 
        508(c)(3) shall be extended for an additional 18 months.
            ``(C) For purposes of this paragraph the term `major 
        disaster' has the meaning given such term in section 102(2) of 
        the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 5122(2)).''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALBERT D. TREICHEL, CATHLEEN

L. TREICHEL,

Plaintiffs,

Case Number 09-13489-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

INERGY PROPANE, LLC, EMERSON

ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Defendants.

______________________________________ /

ORDER FURTHER DIRECTING DEFENDANT INERGY PROPANE LLC TO

IDENTIFY THE CITIZENSHIP OF EACH OF ITS MEMBERS

On November 17, 2009, the Court directed Defendant Inergy Propane LLC to identify the

citizenship of each of its members to satisfy itself that diversity jurisdiction exists in this matter. See

Homfeld II, L.L.C. v. Comair Holdings, Inc., 53 F. App’x 731, 732-33 (6th Cir. 2002) (explaining

that a limited liability company’s citizenship is derived from the citizenship of each of its members).

On December 1, 2009, Defendant responded to the Court [Dkt. # 14] and represented that it was a

wholly owned subsidiary of Inergy, LP, which is organized under Delaware law with its principal

place of business in Missouri. However, this information is not sufficient for the Court to determine

whether diversity jurisdiction exists because it does not properly identify the citizenship of Inergy

LP. The citizenship of a limited partnership is not determined by the state of organization and

principal place of business, but rather by the citizenship of each of its partners. Carden v. Arkoma

Assocs., 494 U.S. 185 (1990). Thus, the Court will direct Defendant to identify the citizenship of

each of Inergy LP’s partners.

1:09-cv-13489-TLL-CEB Doc # 15 Filed 12/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 61
-2-

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Inergy Propane LLC is DIRECTED to

identify the citizenship of each of its members, by identifying the citizenship of each of Inergy LP’s

partners, in writing on or before December 11, 2009. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: December 2, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on December 2, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:09-cv-13489-TLL-CEB Doc # 15 Filed 12/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 62
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Home
Buy & Sell Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Samuel J. Alderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Samuel
      J. AldersonSamuel  J.
      Alderson
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                February
      19, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20457

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

LORENZO HUGHES II,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On September 30, 2009, this case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

October 13, 2009. In open court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by

Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense(s) to which Defendant pleaded guilty is(are) supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have ordered the

preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:09-cr-20457-TLL-CEB Doc # 20 Filed 10/14/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 45
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and Recommendation

within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure

to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins. Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596

(6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The parties are

advised that making some objections, but failing to raise others, will not preserve all the objections

a party may have to this Report and Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security,

474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir. 2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich.

LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this magistrate judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: October 14, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

served upon counsel of record via the Court’s ECF System. 

Date: October 14, 2009 By s/Patricia T. Morris 

Law Clerk to Magistrate Judge Binder

1:09-cr-20457-TLL-CEB Doc # 20 Filed 10/14/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 46
#### A. STEIN & CO., Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 5917.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

April 11, 1938.

Carl Meyer and Herbert A. Friedlich, both of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

Thomas J. Lynch, of Washington, D. C., Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission.

*995SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Now this day come the parties by their counsel and present and file a stipulation that this action be dismissed, which said stipulation is in the words and figures following, to wit:

“It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto, by their respective attorneys, that the above entitled action shall be dismissed forthwith, without costs to either party.

“Dated April 4, 1938.”

It is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that this action be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, without costs to either party, pursuant to the foregoing stipulation.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Sona Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended March 31, 2010 and for the period from January 18, 2007 (date of inception) to March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Monika Sagar, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 April 6 , 2010                                                                MONIKA SAGAR
 Monika Sagar
 Chief Accounting Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 -1-