alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 429

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain interests in

the Waihee Marsh and along the Waihee Stream for inclusion in the

Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire certain

interests in the Waihee Marsh and along the Waihee

Stream for inclusion in the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE INTERESTS FOR IN4 CLUSION IN THE OAHU NATIONAL WILDLIFE

5 REFUGE COMPLEX.

6 (a) AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE.—The Secretary of the

7 Interior may acquire the following for inclusion in the

8 Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Complex:
2

•HR 429 IH

1 (1) The area known as the Waihee Marsh, lo2 cated on the northeast coast of the Island of Oahu,

3 Hawaii, consisting of approximately 30 acres (as de4 termined by the Secretary) along both sides of Ka5 mehameha Highway.

6 (2) A conservation easement in lands that are

7 within approximately 100 feet of either bank of the

8 Waihee Stream, which is located adjacent to the

9 Waihee Marsh referred to in paragraph (1).

10 (b) MANAGEMENT OF ACQUIRED INTERESTS.—

11 Lands and interests acquired by the United States under

12 this section shall be managed by the Secretary of the Inte13 rior as part of the Oahu National Wildlife Refuge Com14 plex.

Æ
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . P D - 1486- 09 R O BE R T V . W O O D A R D A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS O N R EH EA R I N G O F A PPE LL A N T ’ S PET I TI ON FOR DI S CRETI ON ARY REVI EW FROM THE S EVENTH CO URT O F AP PEALS

TARRA NT CO UNTY P ercur iam . O P I N I O N Ap p e l l a n twa s c o n v i c t e d o f th r e e c o u n t s o f

a g g r a v a t e d s e x u a l a s s a u l ta n d two count s of s exual as s aul t . T he j uryas s es s ed puni s hm entatconfi nementforfi ftyy ear s for eac h of the thr ee a ggr avat ed s exual as s aul tcount s and thi r tyy ear s forthe tw o count s of s e x u a l a s s a u lt . T h e C o u rto f A p p e a ls a f

f ir m e d th e c o n v ic tio n . W oodar d v. Stat e , N o. 07- 08- 0288- C R ( T ex. A pp. — A m ar i l l o, del i ver ed J ul y28, 2009 ) . A ppel l ant ’ s pet i t i onW o o d ard - 2 fordi s cr et i onaryr evi ew w as di s m i s s ed as unt i m el yfi l ed on O ct ober28, 2009. A ppel l ant has fi l ed a mot i on forr ehea r i ng r eques t i ng r ei ns t at ementof hi s pet i t i on s o thati tw i l l be cons i der ed bythi s C our t . A ppel l ant ’ s m ot i on forr ehea r i ng i s gr ant ed. H i s pet i t i on fi l ed o n A u g u st 3 1 , 2 0 0 9 , is re in sta ted a s o f D e c e m b e r 1 6 , 2 0 0 9 , an d w ill b e c o n sid e re d in acc or d w i th T ex. R . A pp. P. 68. T he copi es m us tbe fi l ed i n T H IS C our tbyD ece m ber23, 2009.

D el i ver ed D ece m ber16, 2009 D o n ot publi sh
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Sona Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and for the period from January 18, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Monika Sagar, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








February 11, 2011                                                                 MONIKA SAGAR


Monika Sagar


Chief Accounting Officer,


Chief Financial Officer and Director














-1-
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JAMES ERIC SCHEIDT,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10003

D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00293-AWI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

James Eric Scheidt appeals from the 324-month sentence imposed following

his guilty-plea conviction for receipt or distribution of material involving the

sexual exploitation of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

Scheidt contends that the district court plainly erred by including, in its

calculation of his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, four points related to

FILED

JAN 04 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10003

distribution of child pornography under U.S.S.G. §§ 2G2.2(b)(1) and

2G2.2(b)(3)(F). We have not yet resolved the issue of whether the use of a filesharing program, without more, can support the award of distribution points under

section 2G2.2(b). Accordingly, any error on the district court’s part cannot be

deemed to have been plain. See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 734 (1993)

(no plain error unless error is clear under “current law”); United States v.

Thompson, 82 F.3d 849, 856 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Because of the circuit split, the lack

of controlling authority, and the fact that there is at least some room for doubt

about the outcome of this issue, we cannot brand the court’s failure to exclude the

evidence ‘plain error.’”). Nonetheless, the government concedes that there was

error and that it would have conceded the distribution issue had counsel objected at

sentencing. Accordingly, the better course is for us to remand for consideration of

this issue in the first instance.

Scheidt also contends that the district court’s restitution order should be

vacated, as there was no evidence that his crime proximately caused quantifiable

losses, or indeed any losses, to the named victims. After the entry of judgment

below, we decided United States v. Kennedy, 643 F.3d 1251 (9th Cir. 2011), which

set forth a framework for analyzing mandatory restitution orders under
3 10-10003

18 U.S.C. § 2259. On remand, the district court shall revisit its restitution order in

light of the framework set forth in Kennedy.

In view of the remand, it is unnecessary to reach Scheidt’s remaining

contentions.

VACATED and REMANDED.
#### The First Baptist Church of Romulus, Respondent, v. Kendaia Grange No. 64, etc., Appellant.

—Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with ten dollars costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 445 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 445

 To name the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier designated as CVN-76 the 
                         U.S.S. Harry S Truman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1995

  Mr. Skelton (for himself and Mr. Emerson) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To name the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier designated as CVN-76 the 
                         U.S.S. Harry S Truman.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF NEXT NUCLEAR-POWERED AIRCRAFT CARRIER THE U.S.S. 
              HARRY S TRUMAN.

    The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier designated as CVN-76 shall be 
named the U.S.S. Harry S Truman.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hirsch International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the eleven months ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Gallagher, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Paul Gallagher                    |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Paul Gallagher, President, |
|--------|----------------------------|

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer

 

March 28, 2007

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4119 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4119

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, as the ``William Augustus 
        Bootle Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 475 
Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 
``William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
No. 12,903.

#### In re L. D. McLain et al.

The writ of *certiorari*under Art. 101 of the Constitution of 1898 •will not n,ot issue to review decisions of the courts of appeal of mere questions of fact. See *In r e*A. J. Murff praying for the writ. 50 An., not yet reported.

A PPLYING for Writ of Error to the Court of Appeals, First Circuit, in the case of L. D. McLain vs. N. Burgess.

*W. A. Van Hook*for Relators.

Petition filed July 20, 1898.

Opinion handed down July 20, 1898.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Miller, J.

The petition shows the determination by the Court of Appeals on the respective titles of the parties in a petitory action. The Supreme Court has no appellate jurisdiction to review judgments of the courts of appeal. Article 101 of the Constitution adopts the provisions in the act of Congress, March 3, 1891, 26th Statutes, p. 828, Sec. 6, Lau Ow. Bew vs. United States, 144 U. S. 58, authorizing the writ of *certiorari*to Circuit Courts of Appeal. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States under that section was doubtless in contemplation. Generally, the writ issues to secure uniformity of decision by the courts of appeal and *1000other cases of importance presenting legal questions. There is no warrant to use the writ to correct supposed errors of the court in determining the effect of conflicting titles, as in this case. The application is denied.
#### Joe Evans v. State

No. 25529.

November 28, 1951.

Hon. Joseph A. Beyer, Judge Presiding.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for driving a motor vehicle, to-wit, a pickup truck, on a public highway while intoxicated. He was assessed a fine of $250.00 and 30 days in jail.

Bill of Exception No. 1 sets out that while the defendant was testifying in his own behalf he was asked the question by his *475attorney: “You do not make a habit of driving up and down the highway drunk, do you?” To this he replied, “I have never been in trouble before in my life and have never been in court before.” The county attorney then asked him, “Isn’t it a fact that you have been twice convicted of the same offense in this court?” Defendant objected to this and the objection was overruled.

Such complaint is not well founded. Having opened the matter up, the state had a perfect right to make the inquiry which it did and to show the two former convictions.

Bill No. 2 complains that while the jury was at lunch the appellant saw some outside party talking to two of the jurors. He did not hear their conversation but felt that they were talking about him inasmuch as the third party was looking at him while the conversation was going on. This presents nothing for review.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 404

To deny Federal benefits for 10 years to persons convicted of making a

fraudulent representation with respect to residence in order to receive

benefits from 2 or more States, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ZIMMER (for himself, Mr. HERGER, Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mr. ROYCE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To deny Federal benefits for 10 years to persons convicted

of making a fraudulent representation with respect to

residence in order to receive benefits from 2 or more

States, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 404 IH

1 SECTION 1. FEDERAL BENEFITS DENIED FOR 10 YEARS TO

2 PERSONS CONVICTED OF MAKING A FRAUDU3 LENT REPRESENTATION WITH RESPECT TO

4 RESIDENCE IN ORDER TO RECEIVE BENEFITS

5 FROM 2 OR MORE STATES.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person

7 who has received benefits or services during any period

8 under a program administered by a State or by a political

9 subdivision of a State eligibility for which is limited to

10 residents of the State or political subdivision (whether or

11 not the program receives Federal funds), has received ben12 efits or services during the period under such a program

13 administered by another State or by a political subdivision

14 of another State, and is convicted in Federal or State

15 court of making a fraudulent statement or representation

16 to either such program with respect to the place of resi17 dence of the person shall not be eligible, during the 10-

18 year period that begins with the date of the conviction,

19 to receive benefits or services under any program adminis20 tered by the Federal Government eligibility for which is

21 based on need.

22 SEC. 2. FEDERAL EFFORTS TO ASSIST IN PREVENTING

23 FRAUDULENT RECEIPT OF BENEFITS FROM 2

24 OR MORE STATES.

25 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretaries of Health and

26 Human Services, Agriculture, Education, Labor, and
3

•HR 404 IH

1 Housing and Urban Development shall each design and

2 implement a program to assist the States in preventing

3 persons from engaging in conduct described in section 1.

4 (b) REPORTS TO THE CONGRESS.—Within 6 months

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretaries

6 of Health and Human Services, Agriculture, Education,

7 Labor, and Housing and Urban Development shall each

8 submit to the Congress a report on the activities under9 taken by the programs administered by such Secretaries,

10 respectively, to assist the States in preventing persons

11 from engaging in conduct described in section 1.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CIVIL NO.09-13303

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

JOINT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LANSING GLAZIERS LOCAL UNION NO. 826

PENSION & HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUNDS,

Plaintiff(s),

-vWILLING GLASS CO., INC.,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said Court, held in the 

 United States Courthouse, in the City of

 Detroit, State of Michigan, on February 5, 2010.

 

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Plaintiff having filed a return on summons indicating defendant has been 

served; therefore

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause as to why this case should

not be dismissed for failure to serve defendant be and the same is hereby SET ASIDE.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: February 5, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on February 5, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-13303-PJD-VMM Doc # 7 Filed 02/05/10 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0651

_________________

ALLISON SWEEM, individually, and as 

Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF

BRANDON E. ROBERTS,

 Plaintiffs, Appellees, and 

 Cross-Appellants,

v.

FLATHEAD COUNTY, a political division 

of the State of Montana, and DOES 1-10,

 Defendants, Appellants, and 

 Cross-Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

On December 19, 2023, the mediator for this appeal filed a report stating that the 

case has settled. Nothing further has been filed.

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 7(7)(b),

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 24 2024

01/24/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0651
trtc_ex101.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE







This Settlement Agreement and Release (this “Agreement”) is made as of the 16th day of April, 2014, by and between Terra Tech Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Amy Almsteier, a director and officer of the Company (the “Affiliate”).


 


WHEREAS, the Affiliate is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”);


 


WHEREAS, on March 13, 2014, the Affiliate sold 350,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.2509 of the Company (the “March 13, 2014 Transaction”);


 


WHEREAS, on April 15, 2014, the Affiliate purchased 100,000 shares of common stock of the Company, at a purchase price of $0.58 per share (the “April 15, 2014 Transaction”); and


 


WHEREAS, the March 13, 2014 Transaction and the April 15, 2014 Transaction give rise to claims under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act (the “Claim”), in the amount of $67,090 (the “Claim Amount”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1. Settlement and Release. The Affiliate agrees to pay and the Company agrees to accept $67,100 in full settlement and satisfaction of the Claim. The Company hereby agrees that upon receipt of the Claim Amount it will not take any further action against the Affiliate in connection with the Claim or matters relating thereto and releases Affiliate from the Claim. 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.


 


 




	TERRA TECH CORP.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	

/s/ Derek Peterson



	 	
By: 

	/s/ Amy Almsteier	 
	Name:	Derek Peterson	 	Name:	
Amy Almsteier

	 
	Title:	President and CEO
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46334-46335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-08-024]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: August 15, 2008 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-448 and 731-TA-1117 (Final) (Certain Off-the-
Road Tires from China)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently 
scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' opinions to 
the Secretary of Commerce on or before August 28, 2008.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1) Document No. GC-08-147: Final disposition of Inv. No. 337-TA-487 
(Certain Agricultural Vehicles and Components Thereof).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.


    By order of the Commission.


[[Page 46335]]


    Issued: August 5, 2008.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E8-18328 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CIVIL NO.09-12473

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

DAMON NATHANIEL,

Plaintiff(s),

-vCITY OF DETROIT, ET.AL,

 Defendant(s)

 /

ORDER FOR CASE EVALUATION PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF PARTIES

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

 District Courthouse, City of Detroit, County

 of Wayne, State of Michigan on August 26, 2009.

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 United States District Court Judge

The parties having stipulated that this case be referred for case evaluation to a 

Wayne County Case Evaluation Panel and that the parties be bound by the provisions 

of Michigan Court Rule 2.403, now therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred for case evaluation pursuant to said 

Stipulation.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: August 26, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on August 26, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12473-PJD-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 109