alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**

**CHINA GREEN CREATIVE, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ye Xing Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that: 

 
|  

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

        /S/ *Ye Xing Zhang.*        
**Ye Xing Zhang**

**Chief Executive Officer**

**August 23, 2010**

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
ORNEY~GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

June 1, 1959 

Honorable J. W. Edgar Opinion Number WW-637 

Commissioner :of Education 

Texas Education Agency .Re: Whether bonds to be 

Austin, Texas issued under Section 

18, Article VII, Constitution of Texas, 

could be construed 

Dear Dr. Edgar: .as revenue bonds. 

You have asked the opinion of this office as to 

whether the bonds which the Board of Regents of The University of Texas plans to s,ell in July might be construed 

as revenue bonds. You state that if they are construed as 

revenue bonds the Btate ,Board of Education may automatically waive its statutory ,option to purchase bonds is,sued 

by The University of Texas,, by virtue of the TBoard's adopted 

policy not to purchas~e revenue bonds. If these bonds are 

not construed as revenue bonds, you ask whether a procedure 

of the Board in granting an advance waiver on this proposed 

issue would be legal. 

It is the opinion of this office that bonds to be 

issued under the provisions of the 1956 Amendment to Section 

18, Article VII, Constitution of Texas, will be revenue bonds. 

This amendment reads, in part: 

"Any bonds or notes issued hereunder shall 

be payable solely out of the income from 

the Permanent University Fund.' (Rmphasis 

supplied). 

Thus, there is no provis,ion,,or authority for the use 

of funds derived from taxation to service these proposed bonds. 

The distinguishing feature of revenue bonds is that the holders 

of such bonds have no claim upon funds raised or to be raised 

by taxation in order to secure payment of their obligations. 
Honorable J. W. Edgar, page 2 (WW-637) 

City of El Campo v. South Texas Nat. Bank of San Antonio 

et al., 200 S.W.2d 252 (Te~.Civ.App. 1946, error ref'd). 

Article 2673, V.C.S., gives the State Board of Education an option to purchase any bonds issued by The University of Texas. However, according to your letter, the 

Board has adopted a policy of not purchasing revenue bonds. 

SO long as this policy is adhered to, it will have the effect of automatically waiving the option given the Board by 

Article 2673, V.C.S., as concerns bonds to be issued pursuant to Section 18, Article VII, Constitution of Texas. 

Since this office is of the opinion that bonds to be 

issued under the provisions of the Amendment to Section 18, 

Article VII, Constitution of Texas, will be revenue bonds, it 

is not necessary to answer the second question which you asked. 

RTL-s 

Bonds to be issued by the Board of Regents 

of The University of Texas pursuant to the 

amendment to Section 18, Article VII, Constitution of Texas, will be revenue bonds. 

Very truly yours, 

WILL WILSON 

Assistant 

APPROVRU: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Geo . P. Blackburn, Chairman 

L. P. Lollar REVIEWWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GBNBRAL 

Larry Jones By: W. V. Geppert 

Paul W. Floyd, Jr.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 09-20215

Plaintiff, HONORABLE SEAN F. COX

United States District Judge

v.

D-2 JOSE CASTRO-RAMIREZ,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER FOLLOWING JUNE 29, 2010 HEARING

On March 11, 2010, a jury found Dr. Jose Castro-Ramirez guilty of one count of

conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, eleven counts of health

care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347, and one count of conspiracy to commit money

laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). [See Doc. No. 285]. Sentencing for Dr. CastroRamirez was originally scheduled for June 29, 2010. 

At the June 29, 2010 sentencing, Defense Counsel informed the Court that, despite his

best efforts, he has not had sufficient time to review the Presentence Investigation Report with

his client. The Court also sought clarification from Defense Counsel as to the precise nature of

his objections to Dr. Castro-Ramirez’ Presentence Investigation Report. 

Therefore, the Court ORDERS Dr. Castro-Ramirez to file an amended sentencing

memorandum, addressing Dr. Castro-Ramirez’ specific objections to the Presentence

Investigation Report’s individually numbered paragraphs, no later than Thursday, July 15,

2010. Dr. Castro-Ramirez’ sentencing is ADJOURNED to Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 9:30

a.m., at which time the Court will also consider the Government’s Application for Entry of a

Case 2:09-cr-20215-SFC-MKM ECF No. 343, PageID.2015 Filed 06/29/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture & Money Judgment [Doc. No. 328]. Should the sentencing of

Dr. Castro-Ramirez not be completed on July 28, 2010, the Court reserves Wednesday, August

18, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. as a control date for completion of the sentencing. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: June 29, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

June 29, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager

Case 2:09-cr-20215-SFC-MKM ECF No. 343, PageID.2016 Filed 06/29/10 Page 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     Annual Progress Report—University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0289 *Description:*
                     Section 104 (42 U.S.C. 15004) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 2000 (DD Act of 2000) directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to develop and implement a system of program accountability to monitor the grantees funded under the DD Act of 2000. The program accountability system shall include the National Network of University Centers for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (UCEDDs) authorized under Part D of the DD Act of 2000. In addition to the accountability system, Section 154(e) (42 U.S.C. 15064) of the DD Act of 2000 includes requirements for a UCEDD Annual Report. *Respondents:*
                     67. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of responses per respondent
Average burden hours per response
Total burden hoursUCEDD Annual Report Template
67
1
200
13,400
 
 
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     13,400. *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202-395-6974,  Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration for Children and Families. Dated: August 6, 2008. Janean Chambers, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. E8-18629 Filed 8-13-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### Lillian MONDSHEIN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Benjamin Mondshein, and Lillian Mondshein, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 201, Docket 72-1125.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1973.

Decided Jan. 8, 1973.

Joseph P. Hoey, New York City (Amen, Weisman & Butler, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

William M. Brown, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Fred B. Ugast, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Richard W. Perkins, Attys., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Robert Morse, U. S. Atty., E. D. N. Y., on the brief), for appellee.

.Before LUMBARD, KAUFMAN and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment on Judge Mishler’s opinion below, 338 F.Supp. 786 (E.D.N.Y.1971).
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4156

To provide for special immigrant status for certain aliens working as

journalists in Hong Kong.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1996

Mr. PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for special immigrant status for certain aliens

working as journalists in Hong Kong.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT STATUS FOR CERTAIN

4 ALIENS WORKING AS JOURNALISTS IN HONG

5 KONG.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (c), an alien

7 described in subsection (b) shall be treated as a special

8 immigrant described in section 101(a)(27) of the Immi9 gration and Nationality Act.
2

•HR 4156 IH

1 (b) ALIENS COVERED.—An alien is described in this

2 subsection if the alien is—

3 (1) a journalist residing in Hong Kong—

4 (A) who is a national of Hong Kong or

5 China;

6 (B) whose principal employment or source

7 of income has been the news media (including

8 print, radio, and television) in Hong Kong for

9 at least 3 years prior to an application for spe10 cial immigrant status under this section; and

11 (C) whose welfare or safety is likely to be

12 subject to threats or harassment due directly to

13 the journalist’s work in the news media in

14 Hong Kong; or

15 (2) the spouse or child (as defined in subsection

16 (e)) of an alien described in paragraph (1), if accom17 panying or following to join the alien in coming to

18 the United States.

19 (c) PERIOD OF VALIDITY.—

20 (1) The period of validity of a special immi21 grant visa issued under this section shall be on and

22 after January 1, 1997, and before January 1, 2002.

23 (2) Before the date an alien seeks to be admit24 ted to the United States as a special immigrant

25 under this section, the alien shall notify the appro-
3

•HR 4156 IH

1 priate consular officer of the alien’s intention to seek

2 such admission and provide such officer with such

3 information as the officer determines to be necessary

4 to verify that the alien remains eligible for admission

5 to the United States as an immigrant.

6 (d) NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS.—Not more than

7 1,500 visas shall be made available to aliens as special

8 immigrants under this section. Aliens admitted under this

9 section shall not be counted against any numerical limita10 tion established under section 201 or 202 of the Immigra11 tion and Nationality Act.

12 (e) TREATMENT OF CHILDREN.—In this section, the

13 term ‘‘child’’ has the meaning given such term in section

14 101(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and

15 also includes (for purposes of this section and the Immi16 gration and Nationality Act as it applies to this section)

17 an alien who was the child (as so defined) of the alien

18 as of the date of the issuance of an immigrant visa to

19 the alien described in subsection (b)(1).

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Report of Uplift Nutrition, Inc. (the "Registrant") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Gary C. Lewis, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.    Date:November19 , 2009By:/s/Gary C. LewisGary C. LewisPresident, and Chief Executive Officer (CEO)   Date:November19 , 2009By:/s/ Gary C. LewisGary C. LewisPrincipal Financial Officer (CFO) and Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.8

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF CROWN NORTHCORP, INC.

Crown Revenue Services, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown NorthCorp, Inc.

Crown Properties, Inc., an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown Revenue Services, Inc.

CRSBP Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Crown Revenue Services, Inc.

CNC Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown
NorthCorp, Inc.

Eastern Realty, L.L.C., a Virginia limited company, with 99% of the membership
interests owned by CNC Holding Corp., and 1% owned by Crown Revenue Services,
Inc.

Eastern Realty Corporation, a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of CNC Holding Corp.

Eastern Baltimore, Inc., a Virginia corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of
CNC Holding Corp.

CNC Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, is 50% owned by CNC
Holding Corp.

Crown NorthCorp Limited, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Crown NorthCorp, Inc.

Crown Asset Management Ltd., organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Crown NorthCorp Limited.

Crown European Holdings Ltd., organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Crown NorthCorp Limited.

Crown Fastigheter AB, organized under the laws of Sweden, is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Crown European Holdings Ltd.

Crown European Mortgages Ltd., organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Crown Asset Management Ltd.

<PAGE>

Rooftop Mortgages Ltd., organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of Crown Asset Management Ltd.

Crown Mortgage Management Limited, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is
a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown Asset Management Ltd.

Crown Leisure Management, Ltd., organized under the laws of Great Britain, is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Crown Mortgage Management Ltd.

TBE, organized under the laws of Belgium, is 50% owned by Crown Mortgage
Management Ltd.

Regal Mortgages, organized under the laws of Great Britain, is wholly owned by
Crown Mortgage Management Ltd. and Crown NorthCorp Limited.
#### Emma Bauman, Appellant, *v.*Mary A. Goldthorpe, as Administratrix, etc., of Mary McDonald, Deceased, Respondent.

Second Department,

November 27, 1908.

Real property — vendor and purchaser — agreement by administrator to sell lands prior to decree authorizing sale — specific performance.

A contract to sell lands made by an administrator prior to a decree of the surrogate empowering him to sell and the filing of the bond required by the statute is void, and the vendee cannot compel specific performance although the administrator subsequently obtains permission to sell.

Appeal by the plaintiff, Emma Bauman, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 30th day of June, 1908, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Queens County Special Term, sustaining *the*defendant’s demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that after the defendant was appointed administrator of Mary McDonald, who had died intestate, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with such administrator, to sell certain land of the deceased for a price fixed by the said contract, the conveyance to be made when the said administrator should have obtained permission of the Surrogate’s court to sell and convey the *20same; that the administrator thereafter obtained such permission but refused to carry out such contract.

Specific performance was prayed for.

*Charles B.*Mason, for the appellant.

Gregg, *Frank & De*Witt, for the respondent.

Gaynor, J.:

The demurrer that the complaint did not state facts sufficient was properly sustained. On petition by an administrator of an intestate the Surrogate’s court may make a decree empowering him to sell real estate of the intestate to pay debts and funeral expenses; and thereupon, but after first filing in the said court his bond with two sureties, in a penalty to be fixed by the Surrogate, for, the faithful per formance of his duties, he shall have the same power of sale of such real estate as if he were acting as executor under a will of the decedent containing a power of sale of real estate to pay .debts and funeral expenses (Code Civ. Pro. §§ 2750 *et seq.).*Until such decree has been made, and he is under the sanction of such bond, he has no power to make a contract of sale. If he make one it is void.

The interlocutory judgment should be affirmed.'

Woodward, Hooker, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





I,
Michael P. Scarpelli., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Data Domain, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Data Domain, Inc.




Date:
      November 7, 2008
            
            By:
            
            /s/
      MICHAEL P. SCARPELLIMichael
      P. ScarpelliSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD 

OF GREATER ORLANDO, ETC., 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D14-2920

MMB PROPERTIES, ETC., 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed April 13, 2017 

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Osceola County, 

John E. Jordan, Judge. 

Donald E. Christopher and Kyle A. 

Diamantas, of Baker, Donelson, 

Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC., 

Orlando, for Appellant.

Derek J. Angell and Dennis R. 

O'Connor, of O'Connor & O'Connor, 

LLC, Winter Park and Maureen A. Arago

and Keith P. Arago, of Arago Law Firm, 

Kissimmee, for Appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT 

PER CURIAM. 

In accordance with the mandate from the Florida Supreme Court, the temporary 

injunction entered by the trial court is quashed. Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando 

v. MMB Prop., 42 Fla. L. Weekly S204 (Fla. Feb. 23, 2017) (Case No. SC15-1655). The
2

stay entered by this Court is lifted, and the matter is remanded back to the trial court to 

conduct permanent injunction proceedings. 

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

PALMER and EVANDER, JJ, and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-956-1910-BK; Group 41, Illinois]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Illinois.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.
    Contact Information: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The survey was requested by the Army Corps 
of Engineers.
    The land we surveyed are:

Fourth Principal Meridian, Illinois

T. 5 S., R. 7 W
    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines and the resurvey of the lock and 
dam no. 24 acquisition boundary in Sections 26 and 35, Township 5 
South, Range 7 West, of the Fourth Principle Meridian, in the State 
of Illinois, and was accepted August 4, 2008.

    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information. If BLM 
receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to 
the date of official filing, we will stay the filing pending our 
consideration of the protest. We will not officially file the plat 
until the day after we accepted or dismissed all protests and they have 
become final, including decisions on appeals. Copies of the plat will 
be made available upon request and prepayment of the reproduction fees.

    Dated: August 4, 2008.
Ronald J. Eberle,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. E8-18436 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P