AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed October 20, 2021 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00701-CR RICHARD DOUGLAS MCCUTCHEON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1571547-I MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Smith Pursuant to a plea agreement, a ppellant Richard Douglas McCutcheon pleaded guilty to possession of child pornogr aphy, a third degree felony. The trial court found the evidence supported the plea, deferred adjudication, and placed appellant on community superv ision. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to adjudicate guilt and revoke community supe rvision based on vi olation of seven conditions. Appellant pleaded true and made a judicial c onfession to violation of all seven conditions. The trial court found appellant viol ated all seven conditions, adjudicated guilt, and sentenced appellant to eight years in prison. In five issues, appellant alleges the trial court abused its discretio n by revoking his community–2– supervision for failing to (1) avoid persons of disreputable or harmful character, (2) pay supervision fees as directed, (3) co mplete community service hours, (4) pay a sex offender fee of $5.00 per month to th e sex offender fund, and (5) comply with all directives and instructions provided by the registered sex offenders treatment provider or its staff. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. We review an order revoking community supervision for an abuse of discretion. Rickels v. State , 202 S.W.3d 759, 763 (Tex. Cr im. App. 2006). A single violation of a probation condition is sufficie nt to support a trial court’s decision revoking probation. See Garcia v. State , 387 S.W.3d 20, 26 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). A plea of true, standing alone, is sufficient to support revocation of community supervision. See Cole v. State , 578 S.W.2d 127, 128 (Tex. Cr im. App. [Panel Op.] 1979); see also Foley v. State , No. 05-18-01268-CR, 2020 WL 2745250, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 27, 202 0, pet. ref’d). Thus, in or der to prevail on appeal, the defendant must successfully ch allenge all of the findings that support the revocation order. Silber v. State , 371 S.W.3d 605, 611 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.). The record shows that appellant pleaded true to violating seven conditions of his community supervision: (c), (j), (l), (u), (w), (x), and (aa). His plea, standing alone, is sufficient to support revoca tion of community supervision. See Garcia , 387 S.W.3d at 26; Cole , 578 S.W.2d at 128. Moreover, because appellant has not challenged each violation supporting the tr ial court’s decision to revoke community–3– supervision and adjudicate guilt, we mu st affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1 See Olabode v. State , 575 S.W.3d 878, 880–81 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2019, pet. ref’d); see also Phillips v. State , No. 05-16-00850-CR, 2017 WL 2875522, at *2 (Tex. App.— Dallas July 6, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). We overrule appellant’s five issues and affi rm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b) 200701F.U05

1 Appellant did not challenge cond itions (u) and (aa) relating to vi ewing and possessing pornography. /Crai g Smith / CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

RICHARD DOUGLAS MCCUTCHEON, Appellant

No. 05-20-00701-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F-1571547-I. Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. Justices Schenck and Garcia participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered October 20, 2021