alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT NO. 11

                        ROTARY POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                          TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
         BASIC                                                                1998                 1997
         -----                                                                ----                 ----
<S>                                                                        <C>                   <C>
         Shares outstanding, beginning of period                           5,968,516             6,641,432

         Weighted average number of shares issued,
         retired and issuable share equivalents                               72,170              (522,552)

         Weighted average number of common and
         common equivalent shares outstanding                              6,040,686             6,118,880
                                                                         ============          ============
         Net loss                                                        $(1,510,252)          $(5,032,819)
                                                                         ============          ============
         Net loss per common share                                       $(     0.25)          $(     0.82)
                                                                         ============          ============

         DILUTED

         Weighted average number of common and common
         equivalent shares outstanding as adjusted to full
         dilution                                                          6,047,886             6,118,880
                                                                         ============          ============
         Net loss                                                        $(1,510,252)          $(5,032,819)
                                                                         ============          ============
         Net loss per common share                                       $(     0.25)          $(     0.82)*
                                                                         ============          ============

</TABLE>

------------------------------

   * These calculations are submitted in accordance with SEC requirements,
     although they are not in accordance with APB Opinion No. 15 because they
     are anti-dilutive
#### DOBARD v. ST. RAYMOND.*

No. 16084.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 29, 1935.

James Wilkinson and Geo. Leppert, both of New Orleans, for appellant.

Pomes *&*McCabe and Ed. T. Frobea, all of New Orleans, for appellee.

*

Rehearing denied May 13, 1935.

LECHE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Mrs. Camelia Dobard, brought this suit for damages for alleged injuries caused by the defective condition of the premises No. 813 N. Villere street of which her husband, Louis Dobard, was the lessee. From a judgment rejecting her demand, she has appealed.

The record discloses to our satisfaction that the relationship of landlord and tenant existed between petitioner’s husband and defendant; that the plastering in said premises was in a defective condition; and that a part of said plastering fell causing injury to plaintiff. The accident occurred in the fouvth room which was used as a dining room. As plaintiff was bending over a chair, a large section of the plastering from the ceiling fell upon her. Shortly after the accident, defendant had the plastering in this room as well as in other rooms repaired. The principal contention here seems to be the question of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. Contributory negligence was not alleged, but at one point in her testimony plaintiff stated that the plastering was in a very serious condition and looked as though it might *37fall at any moment. The contention is that placing herself in a position where injury would result from plastering which appeared that it might fall at any moment and her testimony to this effect constituted an enlargement of the pleadings and supplied the plea of contributory negligence. The record clearly shows that the plastering which fell upon petitioner came out of the ceiling while that portion which she said looked as though it might fall at any moment was in the wall, and we do not believe that the question of contributory negligence in this respect has been satisfactorily shown. The only remaining question, therefore, is whether or not there was any negligence on the part of defendant and this is affirmatively shown by the record.

The record discloses that petitioner received no serious injuries as a result of the accident. She was somewhat bruised and shaken up and rather than acute pain .seems to have suffered more from stiffness or soreness from which she appears to have been put to some inconvenience for a period of several weeks. It is our opinion that an award of $175 would cover the damages sustained.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is annulled, avoided, and reversed and it is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed that there be judgment herein in favor of plaintiff, Mrs. Camelia Dobard, wife of Louis Dobard, 'and against defendant, Albert St. Raymond, in the full sum of $175, together with legal interest thereon from judicial demand until paid and for all costs.

Reversed.
EX-4.17



 Exhibit 4.17 
  

			
	 388 Greenwich Street,
 14th Floor

New York, NY 10013
	  	





 February 19, 2014 

Delhaize Group 
 Square Marie Curie 40 

1070 Brussels, Belgium 
 Attention: Chief Financial Officer 

Delhaize Group – Change in the ADS to Share Ratio 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Reference is made to the
Second Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2013 (the “Deposit Agreement”), by and among Citibank, N.A., as Depositary (the “Depositary’’), Delhaize Group (the “Company’’),
and all Holders and Beneficial Owners from time to time of American Depositary Shares (‘‘ADSs”) issued thereunder, each ADSs representing one (1) Share (as defined in the Deposit Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein without
definition shall have the meaning assigned thereto in the Deposit Agreement. 
 The Depositary and the Company agree that, effective as of
April 1, 2014, the ADS to Share ratio will be one (1) ADS to one quarter of one (1/4) Share and that the Depositary will file a copy of the form of ADR that evidences the ADSs and that reflects the new ADS to Share ratio pursuant to
Rule 424(b), under the Securities Act, in respect of Form F-6 Registration Statement, as amended (Reg. No.: 333-156796). 
 This letter
agreement amends the Deposit Agreement, but is not intended to prejudice any substantial existing rights of Holders. The Depositary will mail to the holders of ADSs a notice of ratio change substantially in form of Exhibit A hereto. 

The Company and the Depositary will make reference to the terms of this letter agreement in, and attach an executed copy hereof to, the next
Registration Statement on Form F-6 (or the next amendment thereto) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect of the ADSs. 

This letter agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with, and all the rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by, the laws of
the State of New York. 
 The Company and the Depositary have caused this letter agreement to be executed and delivered on their behalf by
their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date set forth above. 
  

			
	CITIBANK, N.A.,
	    as Depositary
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brian M. Teitelbaum
	Name:	 	Brian M. Teitelbaum
	Title:	 	Director


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	DELHAIZE GROUP
		
	By:	 	/s/ Frederic Van Daele
		 	Name: Frederic Van Daele
		 	Title: VP Investor Relations
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Matthew Lovito,  Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Raptor
         Investments, Inc., certify that:

         1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual
         period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
         Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report") fully complies
         with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
         been provided to Raptor Investments, Inc. and will be retained by
         Raptor Investments, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.

         /S/MATTHEW LOVITO
         Matthew Lovito
         Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
         April 8, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 531 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 612
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           September 16, 1996

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Great Western Scenic Trail as a study trail under the 
          National Trails System Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POTENTIAL ADDITION OF GREAT WESTERN SCENIC TRAIL TO NATIONAL 
              TRAIL SYSTEM GREAT WESTERN TRAIL.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(38) The Great Western Scenic Trail, a system of trails to 
accommodate a variety of travel users in a corridor of approximately 
3,100 miles in length extending from the Arizona-Mexico border to the 
Idaho-Montana-Canada border, following the approximate route depicted 
on the map identified as `Great Western Trail Corridor, 1988', which 
shall be on file and available for public inspection in the Office of 
the Chief of the Forest Service, United States Department of 
Agriculture. The trail study shall be conducted by the Secretary of 
Agriculture, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, in 
accordance with subsection (b) and shall include--
            ``(A) the current status of land ownership and current and 
        potential use along the designated route;
            ``(B) the estimated cost of acquisition of lands or 
        interests in lands, if any; and
            ``(C) an examination of the appropriateness of motorized 
        trial use along the trail.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                                                       Calendar No. 612

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Great Western Scenic Trail as a study trail under the 
          National Trails System Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 16, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CEO





I, James M. DeMesa, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MIGENIX Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: | October 31, 2005 |                              
|----- | ---------------- | -----------------------------
|      |                  | James M. DeMesa              
|By:   | James DeMesa   |                              
|      |                  | (Principal Executive Officer)
H. R. 535

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Corning National Fish Hatchery

to the State of Arkansas.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corning National Fish Hatchery

Conveyance Act’’.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CORNING NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO

THE STATE OF ARKANSAS.

(a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days after the

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

shall convey to the State of Arkansas without reimbursement all

right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the property

described in subsection (b), for use by the Arkansas Game and

Fish Commission as part of the State of Arkansas fish culture

program.

(b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Corning National Fish

Hatchery (popularly known as the William H. Donham State Fish

Hatchery), located one mile west of Corning, Arkansas, on Arkansas

State Highway 67 in Clay County, Arkansas, consisting of 137.34

acres (more or less), and all improvements and related personal

property under the control of the Secretary that is located on

that property, including buildings, structures, and equipment.

(c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The property conveyed

to the State of Arkansas pursuant to this section shall be used

by the State for purposes of fishery resources management, and

if it is used for any other purpose all right, title, and interest

in and to all property conveyed pursuant to this section shall

revert to the United States. The State of Arkansas shall ensure
H. R. —5352

that the property reverting to the United States is in substantially

the same or better condition as at the time of transfer.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Case 2:09-cv-13455-RHC-VMM Document 7 Filed 09/29/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:09-cv-13455-RHC-VMM Document 7 Filed 09/29/2009 Page 2 of 2
#### Louis H. Wahl, as Administrator, etc., of Julius P. Wahl, Deceased, and Others, Respondents, v. George L. Lewis and Adelbert Moot, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Deletion of Agenda Item From August 1, 2008, Open Meeting

August 1, 2008.
    The following has been deleted from the list of Agenda items 
scheduled for consideration at the August 1, 2008, Open Meeting and 
previously listed in the Commission's Notice of July 25, 2008, 73 FR 
44745, July 31, 2008. This item has been adopted by the Commission.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Item No.         Bureau                        Subject
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.........  Wireless Tele-     Title: Applications of Cellco Partnership
             Communications.    d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Rural
                                Cellular Corporation for Consent to
                                Transfer Control of Licenses,
                                Authorizations, and Spectrum Manager
                                Leases and Petitions for Declaratory
                                Ruling (WT Docket No. 07-208).
                               Summary: The Commission will consider a
                                Memorandum Opinion and Order and
                                Declaratory Ruling regarding the
                                applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a
                                Verizon Wireless and Rural Cellular
                                Corporation (``RCC'') for consent to the
                                transfer of control of licenses,
                                authorizations, and spectrum manager
                                leasing arrangements held by RCC and its
                                subsidiaries from RCC to Verizon
                                Wireless and the petitions for
                                declaratory ruling filed pursuant to
                                Section 310(b)(4) requesting that the
                                Commission find that it is in the public
                                interest to extend to RCC and its
                                subsidiaries the foreign ownership
                                ruling previously issued to Verizon
                                Wireless for foreign ownership in excess
                                of 25 percent.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18124 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### COLORADO FUEL & IRON CORPORATION et al. v. Charles SCOTT.

No. 1626.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 9, 1938.

Warwick M. Downing, Richard Downing, and Floyd J. Wilson, all of Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Barney L. Whatley and Walter E. Schwed, both of Denver, Colo., for appellee.

*996Before LEWIS, BRATTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed, on motion of appellee, at appellants’ costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 436 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                      November 2, 1995.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
436) entitled ``An Act to require the head of any Federal agency to 
differentiate between fats, oils, and greases of animal, marine, or 
vegetable origin, and other oils and greases, in issuing certain 
regulations, and for other purposes'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Page 2, line 8, after ``to'' insert: the transportation, storage, 
discharge, release, emission, or disposal of

(2)Page 2, line 9, strike out [any] the second time it appears and 
insert: that

(3)Page 2, line 18, strike out [such] and insert: that

(4)Page 2, line 22, strike out [different] the first time it appears

(5)Page 2, line 23, strike out [as provided] and insert: based on 
considerations

(6)Page 3, line 12, strike out [carrying oil in bulk as cargo or cargo 
residue]

(7)Page 3, line 13, after ``carried'' insert as cargo

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 436

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

September 17, 2014

No. 04

- 14

- 00576

- CV

ESTATE OF DELFINA E. ALEXANDER , Deceased

From the County Court at Law No

. 2

, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- PBA

- 000133

- L2 Honorable Jesus Garza , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellants.

It is so ORDERED on September 17, 2014

.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of September, 2014

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk