alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of Promotions On Wheels Holdings, Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Rowland W. Day II, Chief Executive Officer and Robert J. Salluzzo, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations
                of the Company.




By:
            */s/
                Rowland W. Day II*
            
            By:
            */s/Robert
                J. Salluzzo*Rowland
                W. Day
            
            
            Robert
                J. SalluzzoChief
                Executive Officer
            
            
            Chief
                Financial Officer





Dated:
      August 14, 2008
----

----

| (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 16, 2010  |   | /s/Robert T. Strong                        |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | Robert T. Strong                           |   |
|                        |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

| Date: August 16, 2010  |   | /s/John J. Augustine         |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                        |   | John J. Augustine            |   |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Strategic Planning Implementation Workgroup organized by the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC). This telephone conference meeting will be held on August 8, 2008, from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. EDT, at the Neuroscience Center, Conference Room A, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20892. Notice of this workgroup meeting was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 31, 2008, 73 FR 44756.                 

Audio of this workgroup meeting will now be accessible to the public via a teleconference phone link and there will be Web-based access to information displayed at the meeting via computer/projector. 

Access information:

*Phone Number:*                     888-455-2920.                 

*Access Number:*                     3857872.                 

*Webinar registration address: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/​register/​921061447.*

Attendance at the meeting will be limited due to space available. 

The purpose of the workgroup meeting is to discuss future budgetary requirements for the IACC Strategic Plan for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Research. 

The workgroup findings will be forwarded to the IACC for consideration and discussion at the next committee meeting on November 21, 2008. 

                    Information about the IACC is available on the Web site:                     *http://www.nimh.nih.gov/​research-funding/​scientific-meetings/​recurring-meetings/​iacc/​index.shtml*.                 

Dated: August 1, 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E8-18245 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IB

Union Calendar No. 166

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 657

[Report No. 104–315]

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of three hydroelectric projects in the State of Arkansas.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 1995

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

NOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of three hydroelectric projects

in the State of Arkansas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

4 Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of

5 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) the Federal En-
2

•HR 657 RH

1 ergy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the li2 censee for FERC Project No. 4204, 4660, and 4659 (and

3 after reasonable notice), is authorized, in accordance with

4 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest require5 ments of such section 13 and the Commission’s procedures

6 under such section, to extend the time required for com7 mencement of construction for the project for up to a max8 imum of 3 consecutive 2-year periods. This section shall

9 take effect for the project upon the expiration of the exten10 sion (issued by the Commission under such section 13)

11 of the period required for commencement of construction

12 of such project.

Union Calendar No. 166

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 657

[Report No. 104–315]

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

electric projects in the State of Arkansas.Act applicable to the construction of three hydroNOVEMBER 7, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

 SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 09-10324

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

-vASSORTED JEWELRY VALUED AT APPROXIMATELY $21,975.00

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said court, held in the

 United States Courthouse, in the City of

 Detroit, State of Michigan, on June 17, 2009.

 

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court having issued an Order to Show Cause for lack of progress and the 

Plaintiff having requested and obtained a Clerk’s Entry of Default , therefore;

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause as to

why this case should not be dismissed for lack of progress be and the same is hereby SET

ASIDE.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: June 17, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on June 17, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10324-PJD-DAS Doc # 13 Filed 06/17/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 35
mine_ex101.htm



Exhibit 10.1


 



	  

Minerco Resources, Inc.



20 Trafalgar Square, Suite 455



Nashua, NH 03063


  









	





 




 



April 9, 2014


 







 


VIA FACSIMILE (718) 732-4512


 


LG Capital Funding LLC


1218 Union St. Suite #2


Brooklyn, NY 11225


Fax 718-732-4512


Attn: Joseph Lerman - Managing Member







Re:           Notice of Repayment of Convertible Promissory Note


 


Dear Mr. Lerman:


 


Reference is made to the Note in the principal amount of $27,000 issued on December 19, 2013 by Minerco Resources, Inc.  (“Borrower”) to LG Capital Funding, LLC (“Lender”).  This letter shall serve as notice under Section 1.9 of the Note that (i) the Borrower is exercising its right to prepay the Note; (ii) the date of the prepayment shall be April 11, 2014; and (iii) upon payment of the Optional Prepayment Amount, the Note shall be paid in full and Borrower shall have no remaining obligations thereunder. This letter shall serve as written notice of the prepayment of the Note as delivered to you in accordance with Section 4.2 of the Note.







We acknowledge and agree that on or before April 11, 2014, the Optional Prepayment Date, we will make payment to your order of an amount equal to equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%), multiplied by the sum of: (w) the outstanding principal amount of the Note plus (x) accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Note to the Optional Prepayment Date plus (y) Default Interest, if any, on the amounts referred to in clauses (w) and (x) plus (z) any amounts owed to the Holder pursuant to Sections 1.3 and 1.4(g) of the Note.  All capitalized terms have the meaning set forth in the Note.







Thank you.


 


                                                                           Sincerely,


                                                                           John F. Powers


                                                                           President


 


cc:           Gracin & Marlow, LLP (via facsimile (212) 208-4657)


 


Taliesin Durant, Esq. (via facsimile tali@dart-services.com)




 



	  

  






//File                       Page  1 of 1                  Repayment of LG Capital Note 12-19-2013
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00346-CR

EX PARTE KIMLY RUSHA TERRELL

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-627-C2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 7, 2014, we received a document from Kimly Rusha Terrell related 

to an earlier appeal styled Terrell v. State which was docketed as 10-11-00022-CR. The 

conviction in 10-11-00022-CR is final. Our mandate issued January 13, 2012. 

It is difficult to tell what request Terrell has made and who has acted or failed to 

act on her request. Based on the nature of the relief requested from this Court, we have 

determined Terrell’s request to be a request for post-conviction relief; that is, a petition 

for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07.1 See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 

 

1

In the event this document is meant to be a petition for writ of mandamus to order the trial court or trial 

court clerk to provide Terrell a free copy of her criminal trial record, Terrell is not entitled to a free copy 

unless she can show that a post-conviction proceeding is not frivolous and that she has a specific need for 
Ex parte Terrell Page 2

(West 2005). We have no jurisdiction to grant post-conviction relief in an attack on a 

final felony judgment. See id. art 11.05. Accordingly, we dismiss this proceeding for 

lack of jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 4, 2014

Do not publish 

OT06

 

the record. Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 784 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, order); see also In re 

Rodriguez, No. 10-13-00201-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 8662 (Tex. App.—July 11, 2013, no pet.) (not 

designated for publication). The need for a record from a prior proceeding simply to search for possible 

post-conviction issues is not enough. Id. Based on what Terrell filed here, she has not shown she is 

entitled to relief by mandamus. Therefore, we would deny her petition if her request was denied by the 

trial court and dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction if her request was denied by the trial court clerk.
KENNETH DAVID LEBAY

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3559

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Michael Jones , Judge

.

Glenn M. Swiatek, Shalimar , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR

, JAY

, and M.K. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 99.2

ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

YAMAHA
MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A.

---

YAMAHA
MOTOR MASTER TRUST

---

The
undersigned, duly authorized representative of Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. ("Yamaha"), as Servicer pursuant to the Amended and
Restated Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1999 (as amended, the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), by and among
Yamaha, as Servicer, Yamaha Motor Receivables Corporation, as Transferor and JPMorgan Chase Bank, successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank (which succeeded The Fuji Bank and Trust Company), as trustee
(in such capacity the "Trustee"), does hereby certify to the best of his or her knowledge after reasonable investigation that:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer's Certificate as of May 31, 2003.

| |  | YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A.,
    as Servicer     
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                                   
| |  | Name:  Russell D. Jura
Title:    Senior Vice President

---

QuickLinks
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 Quotient Limited Certificate number for Shares issued to of Entered in Register of Members Folio: Dated The
Companies (Jersey) Law, 1991 No. of Certificate No. of Shares Quotient Limited THIS IS TO CERTIFY that of Is the Registered Proprietor of Shares of each in the above-named Company, Subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the
Company. GIVEN under the Common Seal of the said Company, the Day of Director Director Secretary
#### Foy Edward Nichols v. State

No. 25361.

June 20, 1951.

Appellant's Motion for Rehearing Denied Without Written Opinion) October 10, 1951.

Hon. E. E. Jordan, Judge Presiding.

*Reynold M. Gardner,*Amarillo, for appellant.

*George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $200.00.

*365The sole question presented for review is whether an indictment charging one with driving an automobile while intoxicated will support a conviction when the proof shows that he was driving a truck. As will be seen, a disposition of this case hinges upon the definition of the word “automobile.”

Ballentine’s Law Dictionary with Pronunciations defines an automobile as “a wheeled vehicle, propelled by steam, electricity or gasoline, and used for the transportation of *persons*or *merchandise.”*

Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Rawle’s 3rd Edition, says that an automobile is “a vehicle for the carriage of *passengers*or *freight,*propelled by its own motor.”

Black’s Law Dictionary, 3rd Edition, defines automobile as “a vehicle for the transportation of *persons*or *property*on the highway, carrying its own motive power and not operated upon fixed tracks.”

Webster’s New International Dictionary, 2d Edition, Unabridged, gives us the following definition: “An automobile vehicle or mechanism; esp., a self-propelled vehicle suitable for use on a street or roadway.”

Other jurisdictions have given the term “automobile” a broad interpretation. In Stanley v. Tomlin, 129 S.E. 379, it was held that “ ‘Automobile’ is a general name adopted by proper approval for *all*forms of self-propelling vehicles for use on highways and streets for general *freight*and *passenger*service; a wheeled vehicle propelled by gasoline, steam or electricity.”

The term “automobile” has been held to include a “truck” in the following cases: Kellaher v. City of Portland, 112 Pac. 1076, 57 Ore. 575; Wiese v. Polzer, 248 N.W. 113, 212 Wis. 337; Bethlehem Motors Corporation v. Flynt, 100 S.E. 693, 178 N.C. 399; L. & C. Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Roland, 165 S.E. 293, 45 Ga. App. 467.

The Kansas City Court of Appeals in Hoover v. National Casualty Company, 162 S.W. 2d 363, approved the Bouvier’s Law Dictionary definition set forth above.

In the light of the foregoing definitions and decisions, it is the holding of this court that the term “automobile,” as used by *366the legislature in defining the offense of driving while intoxicated, is a generic term which includes the motor vehicle commonly known as a “truck.”

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                 SUBSIDIARIES OF NEXSTAR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                           <C>
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals GmbH................................  (Germany)
NeXstar Farmaceutica, S.A...................................  (Spain)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Italia, Srl.........................  (Italy)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals Limited.............................  (United Kingdom)
NeXstar Farmaceutica Portugal, LDA..........................  (Portugal)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals B.V.................................  (The Netherlands)
NeXstar Pharmaceutique Sarl.................................  (France)
NeXstar Pharmaceuticals PTY Limited.........................  (Australia)
</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Panhandle Eastern Pipe
      Line
      Company, LP (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Richard N. Marshall, as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (i) the Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





/s/
      RICHARD N. MARSHALL


Name:
      Richard N. Marshall


Title:
      Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
      May
      10, 2007














This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
      Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
      whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any
      general incorporation language contained in such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documents
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Vitup Health Care Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), I, Feng Gu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  November 15, 2010 /s/Feng Gu, Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 24, 2011 

p0516 

Order 

 

May 24, 2011 

142437 

ALPHA INVESTMENT, L.L.C., 

ALPHA DIAGNOSTIC CLINIC, P.C., and 

ALPHA MEDICAL CLINICS, P.C., 

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, 

and 

ABDALRAHMAN KATRANJI, 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- 

 Appellee, 

v SC: 142437 

 COA: 291939 

Wayne CC: 06-610358-CK 

ALPHA REAL ESTATE, L.L.C., 

ALPHA CLINIC, P.C., and 

FIROZA B. VAN HORN, 

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ 

Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

and 

ALPHA PROPERTIES, L.L.C., 

 Third-Party Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Harriet M. Benjamin, Plaintiff, v. Ada C. Duke and John E. Duke, Defendants. Thomas H. Bradley, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs.