alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18464]

[[Page 46611]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13149-000]

FFP Ohio River 1, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

August 5, 2008.
    On March 25, 2008, FFP Ohio River 1, LLC each filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Ohio River 10 and Ohio River 1 Projects, to be 
located on the Ohio River in Pulaski County, Illinois and Ballard 
County, Kentucky.
    The proposed Ohio River 1 Project consists of: (1) 3,180 proposed 
20 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total installed 
capacity of 63.6 megawatts, (2) a proposed transmission line, and (3) 
appurtenant facilities. The FFP Ohio River 1, LLC, project would have 
an average annual generation of 278.57 gigawatt-hours and be sold to a 
local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Dan Irvin, FFP Ohio River 1, LLC, 69 Bridge 
Street, Manchester, MA 01944, phone (978) 232-3536.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13149) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18464 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Exhibit 10.18


 





	
        Precision
        Optics Corporation




 


CONFIDENTIAL


 


Memo 


 


		To:	Dan Habhegger



		From:	Joe Forkey



		Date:	November 27, 2019	POC: 19-0062



		Subject:	Promotion to CFO






      _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________





In recognition of
the quality and extent of the work you have done in the roughly three months since you started at Precision Optics, I am pleased
to offer you the position of Precision Optics Corporation’s Chief Financial Officer, effective December 2, 2019. If you accept
this position, you will be required to perform all duties of the Company’s CFO, including, but not limited to, the following:


 


		·	Manage the Company’s Accounting
department and all accounting related activities



		·	Prepare monthly / quarterly / yearly financial
statements 



		·	Prepare SEC required filings, coordinate
associated audits, and approve filings as the Company’s Principal Accounting Officer



		·	Maintain and update accounting software
systems 



		·	Administer employee benefits



		·	Prepare budgets and forecasts



		·	Analyze Company sales, operations, margins,
etc with the goal of improving Company profitability



		·	Act as Corporate Secretary



		·	Support the CEO and Board of Directors
in their interactions with investors and shareholders



		·	Various other projects and duties as assigned
by the Company CEO



 


If you accept this
position, your annual salary will increase to $170,000. All other benefits and compensation will remain the same.


 


This offer and your
response are not meant to constitute a contract of employment for a specific term. This means that you retain the right to terminate
your employment at any time and the Company will retain a similar right. However, if your position in the Company is involuntarily
terminated within six (6) months after a “Change in Ownership” for a reason other than “Cause”, the Company
will give you six (6) months’ notice or payment in lieu of notice at your then current salary rate.


 


If you agree to this
promotion and the associated terms identified in this memo, please sign and date below.


 


 





	/s/ Daniel S. Habhegger                  	12/2/2019                   

                            

	Daniel S. Habhegger	Date
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 23 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 23 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 23 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 3 of 3
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MATTHEW MULLIGAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1024

[November 9, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 16-7354CF10A and 16-6882 CF10A.

Matthew Mulligan, Milton, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

----

| (1) | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |   |                                 |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
| Date: November 12, 2009 |   | /s/Robert T. Strong                  |
|                    |   | Robert T. Strong                     |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Office |

|                    |   |                         |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Date: November 12, 2009 |   | /s/John J. Augustine         |
|                    |   | John J. Augustine            |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Acquired Sales Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerard M. Jacobs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerard M. JacobsGerard M. Jacobs Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

Date: August 13, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                       187
<INVENTORY>                                        775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,088
<PP&E>                                          28,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,829
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,354
<SALES>                                         73,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,188
<CGS>                                           25,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,237
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (22)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
2:09-cv-13638-LPZ-MAR   Doc # 48   Filed 10/14/11   Pg 1 of 3    Pg ID 499

2:09-cv-13638-LPZ-MAR   Doc # 48   Filed 10/14/11   Pg 2 of 3    Pg ID 500

2:09-cv-13638-LPZ-MAR   Doc # 48   Filed 10/14/11   Pg 3 of 3    Pg ID 501
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on August 5, 2008 at 
5 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5), 
(7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at 
the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for August 5, 
2008 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; and 
other matters related to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: August 5, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18394 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00027-CV

Michael Joseph Schmitt

v.

Gina Patrice Schmitt

On Appeal from the

353rd District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-FM-21-005575

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 27, 2023
#### John Earl Huskey v. State

No. 25651.

February 6, 1952.

Hon. Lea Boothe, Judge Presiding.

*Croslin & Pharr,*by *E. S. Pharr,*Lubbock, for appellant.

*627
      *James Pearson,*County Attorney, Sweetwater, and *George P. Blackburn,*State’s Attorney, Austin, for the state.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The complaint and information charged possession of whisky and beer in a dry area for the purpose of sale, two prior convictions being alleged for the purpose of enhancing the punishment. Upon a jury trial, appellant was convicted and his punishment assessed at a fine of $400.00.

The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. The premises searched is referred to as “Highway 80 Club,” and appears to be the same premises searched a week previously, the evidence obtained becoming the basis for the complaint in another prosecution brought to this court in Huskey v. State, No. 25,437, 248 S.W. (2d) 131.

The place searched was referred to as “Mr. Huskey’s place” by the searching officer who testified also, “I walked in the door and handed Earl the search warrant, and I says to him, ‘Have you got anything?’ and he says, ‘You are not kidding.’” The •search resulted in the finding of 13*4 cases of beer, 5 half-pints and 3 pints of whisky.

Appellant did not testify but offered evidence to the effect that he did not occupy the premises searched as a residence, but was there at the time of the search visiting his brother who lived there. We are inclined to view the reply of appellant to the officer’s question above quoted, as did the county attorney in his argument, that is, as an admission that he possessed the beer and whisky found by the officers. We think the jury was warranted in finding that the “Mr. Huskey” referred to by the officer in his testimony was appellant, John Earl Huskey, and not the brother Lynn Huskey. Being recalled, this witness described those present at the time of the search as “Steve Wells, Mr. and Mrs. Huskey and wife, and Lynn Huskey.” He said Lynn Huskey is the brother of the defendant.

From the verdict it is apparent that the jury accepted the state’s version as to the possession and control of the beer and whisky, and the purpose of such possession, and declined to accept the defense testimony to the effect that Lynn Huskey was in control of the premises and the liquor found there. The *628evidence is sufficient to sustain such verdict, and no reversible error appears.

The judgment is affirmed.
|   | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Extreme Home Staging, Inc.  for the quarter ended June  30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) the information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Extreme Home Staging, Inc.  for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Extreme Home Staging, Inc.                                                         |

|                           |                                                      |                  |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                           | EXTREME HOME STAGING, INC.                                |
|                           |                                                      |                  |
| Date:  July 21, 2009 | By:                                                       | /s/ Milka Fixler |
|                           | Milka Fixler                                              |
|                           | Chief Executive Officer                                   |
|                           | (principal executive officer and duly authorized officer) |
#### M. Pickett MYERS, III, and Elizabeth Myers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 72-2360.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 31, 1973.

Pascol J. Townsend, Jr., Drew, Miss., C. S. Tindall, Jr., Greenville, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.

H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Atty., Dept of Justice, Jack D. Warren, Atty., Tax Div., Refund Trial Section, Ann E. Belanger, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

Before GODBOLD, DYER and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the opinion of the District Court, Myers v. United States, 345 F.Supp. 197 (N.D.Miss.1972).
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
MSFCM L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.





By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 31, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 52 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 52

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the 25 percent 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals 
    for 1994 and to provide a 100 percent deduction for such costs 
                           beginning in 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Pomeroy (for himself, Mr. Minge, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Boucher, Mr. 
     Portman, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Doyle, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. 
 Gilchrest, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Murtha, Mr. 
 Chapman, Mr. Owens, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Kim, Mr. Coyne, Mr. 
Reynolds, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mrs. Vucanovich, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, 
Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Sanders, Mr. McHale, Mr. Bachus, Ms. Pryce, Mr. Wise, 
  Mr. Hinchey, Mr. Gunderson, Mr. Blute, Mr. Castle, Mr. Dickey, Mr. 
   Talent, Mr. Baesler, Mr. Roemer, Mr. Hefner, Mr. Emerson, and Mr. 
Barrett of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the 25 percent 
 deduction for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals 
    for 1994 and to provide a 100 percent deduction for such costs 
                           beginning in 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-EMPLOYED 
              INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) Deduction Made Permanent; 25 Percent Deduction for Taxable 
Years Beginning in 1994.--
            (1) In general.--Subsection (l) of section 162 of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for 
        health insurance costs of self-employed individuals) is amended 
        by striking paragraph (6).
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.
    (b) Deduction Increased to 100 Percent.--
            (1) In general.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of such 
        Code is amended by striking ``25 percent'' and inserting ``100 
        percent''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00012

- CR

John Adonis

- Hercule BRACY

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019

- CR

- 8524 Honorable Frank J. Castro , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE RIOS

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

SIGNED April 6, 2022.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice