alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER YATOOMA and CARRIE

YATOOMA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Defendant.

Case No. 09-13521

DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

R. STEVEN WHALEN

 /

ORDER

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [6]

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [6]. No response was filed. On

November 23, 2009, the Court heard argument on the Motion.

For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [6] is GRANTED

with prejudice.

The case is hereby DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: NOVEMBER 24, 2009

2:09-cv-13521-AJT-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 11/24/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 57
09-13521

I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE FOREGOING DOCUMENT WAS SERVED UPON COUNSEL OF

RECORD ON NOVEMBER 24, 2009, BY ELECTRONIC AND/OR ORDINARY MAIL.

S/THERESA E. TAYLOR 

CASE MANAGER

2:09-cv-13521-AJT-RSW Doc # 8 Filed 11/24/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 58
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



            In connection with the annual report of AMB Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Daniel T. Poludniak, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



Date:         April 3, 2003                /s/ Daniel T. Poludnaik
            ------------------             -------------------------------------
                                           Daniel T. Poludnaik
                                           Vice President, Treasurer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                      27,359,353
<SECURITIES>                                32,541,020
<RECEIVABLES>                                  751,413
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,787,871
<PP&E>                                       2,855,508
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,134,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,628,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,738,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,830
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,322,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,628,350
<SALES>                                      4,492,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,801,632
<CGS>                                        2,608,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,642,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,116,031
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,014,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,700,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,314,224)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,314,224)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lewis A. ROGERS, Appellant. Lewis A. ROGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49882, WD 51710.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 20, 1996.

David Simpson, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Lewis Rogers appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance in a correctional facility, saying his motion to represent himself *pro se*should have been granted.

The judgments are affirmed, because 1) no issues pertaining to the denial of the Rule 29.15 motion are presented, and 2) the motion for *pro se*representation was not unequivocal and was not timely. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 

136947 & (24) 

In re ANGEL PETERSON 

_____________________________________/ 

ANGEL PETERSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v 

WAYNE CIRCUIT JUDGE,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_____________________________________/ 

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

 SC: 136947 

 COA: 282794 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

miscellaneous relief is DENIED. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Case No. 09-12950

Plaintiff, Honorable David M. Lawson

v.

JOHN J. BRAVATA, RICHARD J. 

TRABULSY, ANTONIO M. BRAVATA,

BBC EQUITIES, LLC, BRAVATA 

FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, and SHARI A. 

BRAVATA,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING WEST WIND OF BAREFOOT BEACH’S MOTION FOR

LIMITED RELIEF FROM ORDER FREEZING ASSETS AND EXCLUDING

PROPERTY LOCATED AT 26868 HICKORY BOULEVARD IN BONITA SPRINGS,

FLORIDA FROM THE ORDER FREEZING DEFENDANTS’ ASSETS

On October 6, 2009, West Wind of Barefoot Beach, LLC, a non-party to this case, filed a

motion asking the Court to exclude from the order freezing the defendants’ assets the property

located at 26868 Hickory Boulevard in Bonita Springs, Florida. West Wind seeks to extinguish

defendant John J. Bravata’s tenancy rights in the Bonita Springs property as a result of Bravata’s

alleged breach of a residential lease. West Wind seeks the Court’s permission to exercise its statelaw remedies to regain possession of the property; at the present time, West Wind does not seek

money damages from the defendant.

On October 30, 2009, the receiver filed a response to West Wind’s motion, stating that he

does not oppose West Wind’s request. Other parties did not respond to West Wind’s motion or

otherwise make their positions known, and the time for filing responses has passed. E.D. Mich. LR

7.1(d)(2)(B). Although the Court initially scheduled the motion for a hearing on November 23,

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 131 Filed 11/05/2009 Page 1 of 2
-2-

2009, the Court is satisfied that the relief requested by West Wind should be granted, and no hearing

on West Wind’s motion is necessary.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that West Wind of Barefoot Beach’s motion for limited relief

from order freezing assets [dkt. # 84] is GRANTED. West Wind may exercise its state-law

remedies to regain possession of the property in Bonita Springs, Florida. However, West Wind may

not seek money damages from defendant John J. Bravata, absent specific permission from this

Court. 

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 5, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 5, 2009.

s/Teresa Scott-Feijoo 

TERESA SCOTT-FEIJOO

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 131 Filed 11/05/2009 Page 2 of 2
2:09-cv-13552-PDB-MAR Doc # 45 Filed 07/14/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 496
2:09-cv-13552-PDB-MAR Doc # 45 Filed 07/14/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 497
#### In the Matter of the Election of Directors of The Manoca Temple Association.

— Decision reserved until the hearing of the appeal.
#### Gilbert A. Middleton, Appellant, v. Beatrice E. Middleton, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. No opinion.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark
Meller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:   May
20, 2009





By: /s/ Mark Meller


Mark
Meller


Chief
Executive Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00379

- CV

IN RE TEXAS REAL EST ATE COMMISSION

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Just ice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

On January 24, 2018, this court conditionally granted relator’s petition for writ of

manda mus, and ordered the trial court to vacate its Order Granting Bill of Review and Injunctive

Relief, and reinstate the July 31, 2013 default judgment. On March 1, 2018, we denied the real

party in interest’s motion for rehearing.

On March 9, 2018, relator filed a “letter” with this court asking this court to issue a writ

of mandamus to compel the trial court to comply with our January 24, 2018 opinion and order.

On March 12, 2018, the trial court signed an order complying with our opinion and order. We

t herefore DENY relator’ s request for a writ of mandamus AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on March 14, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- CI

- 03723 , styled Evan Jacobson v. Ben Luong , pending in the 45th

Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129573 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DANA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129573 COA: 255984 Ct of Claims: 04-000035-MT DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 18, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal.

l0406 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 13, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Fred
O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that:





The
Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2008
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Fred O’ConnorFred
      O’Connor, Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      November 18, 2008
EXHIBIT 32
----------





                   WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF
     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of AMLI Residential Properties Trust ("AMLI"), each hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of each of their
knowledge:

     (a)  AMLI's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
          December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
          1934; and

     (b)  that information contained in AMLI's Annual Report on
          Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
          financial condition and results of operations of AMLI.



Date:     March 10, 2004      By:  /s/ Gregory T. Mutz
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Gregory T. Mutz
                                   Chief Executive Officer



Date:     March 10, 2004      By:  /s/ Robert J. Chapman
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Robert J. Chapman
                                   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,729

EX PARTE CARLOS ALEJANDRO VILLEGAS Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-0622654-P IN THE 203 DISTRICT COURT

RD

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted

of possession with intent to deliver over 400 grams cocaine and sentenced to twenty years’

imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Villegas v. State, No. 05-07-

00294-CR (Tex. App.–Dallas, Nov. 27, 2007, pet. ref’d). 

This Court filed and set this application and ordered briefs prepared by the parties. 

Applicant, through counsel, has now filed a motion to dismiss the application. This application is
2

hereby dismissed pursuant to Applicant’s request. 

Delivered: May 23, 2012

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERICAN EXPLORATION CORPORATION (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Ravinder Minhas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Ravinder Minhas
                                       -----------------------------------------
Date: October 27, 2008                 Ravinder Minhas
                                       Secretary Treasurer
                                       Principal Financial and Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Darren J. Holm, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Animal Cloning Sciences, Inc., Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Animal Cloning Sciences,
Inc., Inc.

Date: April 20, 2007

/s/ Darren J. Holm
   ------------------------------
Darren J. Holm
Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JIANPING SU,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 22

- 867 Agency No. A206

- 670

- 855

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 18 , 2023 **
Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BADE , Circuit Judges

. Jianping Su , a native and citizen of China , petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convent ion Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 8 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 867

the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations under the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039‐40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility
determination based on inconsistencies regarding Su and her daughter’s escape from family planning officials , and Su’s dem eanor during her daughter’s testimony. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility finding reasonable under the totality of the circumstances) ; Manes v. Sessions , 875 F.3d 1261, 1263

- 64 (9th Cir. 2017) (agency’s demeanor finding was supported where IJ provided

“ specific, first

- hand observations”). Su’s explanations do not compel a contrary
conclusion. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in the absence of credible testimony, in this case, Su’s asylum and withholding of
removal claims fai l. See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection
because Su’s claim was based on the same testimony the agency found not credible, and Su does not point to any other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than not she would be tortured in China

. See id

. at 1157.
We do not consider the materials Su references in her opening brief that are not part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS , 79 F.3d 955, 963

- 64 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).3 22

- 867

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### In the Matter of the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of William Maroney, as Administrator, etc., of Mary Mack, Deceased. William Maroney, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Appellant; Seth P. Cook, Respondent.

Decree unanimously affirmed, with costs.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

d0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

141889 & (11)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141889 COA: 299064 Chippewa CC: 07-008602-FH ADAM SHANE EARL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 23, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The
motion to remand is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 543

  To approve a governing international fishery agreement between the 
               United States and the Republic of Estonia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 1995

   Mr. Saxton (by request) introduced the following bill; which was 
                 referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To approve a governing international fishery agreement between the 
               United States and the Republic of Estonia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGREEMENT WITH ESTONIA.

    Notwithstanding section 203 of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation 
and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1823), the governing international 
fishery agreement between the Government of the United States of 
America and the Government of the Republic of Estonia, as contained in 
the message to Congress from the President of the United States dated 
January 18, 1995, is approved as a governing international fishery 
agreement for the purposes of such Act and shall enter into force and 
effect with respect to the United States on the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BELL’S BREWERY, INC.,

Appellant, 

v. 

BELL HILL VINEYARDS, LLC, 

Appellee. 

____________________ 

2010-1280 

(Opposition No. 91177980) 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

BRUCE R. EWING, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of New 

York, New York, argued for appellant. 

PHILIP C. OLSSON, Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Bode 

Matz PC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With 

him on the brief was GARY H. BAISE. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LINN, PLAGER, and PROST, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 13, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk