alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.];(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  May 15, 2008
    /s/ Albert F. BuzzettiAlbert F. BuzzettiPresident and Chief Executive Officer 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case Number 09-20403-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

v.

D-2 BERNARD IVAN DAVIS,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT ONE OF THE SECOND

SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT

UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on July 1, 2010, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. Judge Binder issued his report on July 1, 2010,

recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one of the second

superseding indictment. As of today’s date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Binder’s

report and recommendation. The election to not file objections to the report releases the Court from

its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation [Dkt. # 83] is

ADOPTED.
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one of the second

superseding indictment is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 75] is taken

UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: August 20, 2010

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on August 20, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chancery Resources, Inc. for the period      ended August 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chancery      Resources, Inc.                                                                  |

|   | /s/ Rafael Pinedo                  |   |
|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Rafael      Pinedo                 |   |
|   | President      and Director        |   |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
|   | Chancery      Resources, Inc.      |   |

----
#### The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Edward G. Herendeen, as Trustee of Edward W. Herendeen, Deceased, and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
#### People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

Gen. No. 50,371.

First District, First Division.

October 3, 1966.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender of Cook County, of Chicago (Marshall A. Patner, Frederick F. Cohn and James J. Doherty, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant; Daniel P. Ward, State’s Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago (Elmer C. Kissane and Joel M. Flaum, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for appellee.

Opinion by

ME. JUSTICE MUEPHY.

Not to be published in full.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission
 The following has been deleted from the list of Agenda items scheduled for consideration at the August 1, 2008, Open Meeting and previously listed in the Commission's Notice of July 25, 2008, 73 FR 44745, July 31, 2008. This item has been adopted by the Commission. Item No.
Bureau
Subject3
Wireless Tele-Communications
*Title:*
                             Applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Rural Cellular Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses, Authorizations, and Spectrum Manager Leases and Petitions for Declaratory Ruling (WT Docket No. 07-208).*Summary:*
                             The Commission will consider a Memorandum Opinion and Order and Declaratory Ruling regarding the applications of Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Rural Cellular Corporation (“RCC”) for consent to the transfer of control of licenses, authorizations, and spectrum manager leasing arrangements held by RCC and its subsidiaries from RCC to Verizon Wireless and the petitions for declaratory ruling filed pursuant to Section 310(b)(4) requesting that the Commission find that it is in the public interest to extend to RCC and its subsidiaries the foreign ownership ruling previously issued to Verizon Wireless for foreign ownership in excess of 25 percent.
 Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. E8-18124 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 ----------------------------

[LOGO] KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
          
          Certified Public Accountants
          One Jericho Plaza 
          Jericho, NY 11753

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors 
Reliance Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements (Nos.
33-81278 and 333-20379) on Form S-8 of Reliance Bancorp, Inc of our report dated
July 24, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of
Reliance  Bancorp,  Inc.  and  subsidiary  as of June 30,  1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended June 30, 1997,
which report is incorporated by reference to the June 30, 1997 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Reliance Bancorp, Inc..



/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
     Jericho, New York
     September 29, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMUEL RIDDLE, JR., and MARY

WATERS,

Defendants.

 /

Case Number: 09-20295

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

MEMORANDUM REGARDING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion requesting a hearing

regarding conflicts of interest and possible attorney disqualification. In its motion, the

government expresses concern that Defendant Mary Waters’ counsel in this case,

Richard Convertino, recently appeared on behalf of Defendant Samuel Riddle, Jr. in a

separate case (“Detroit Case”). Although Convertino has appeared on behalf of Riddle

in the Detroit Case, John McManus currently represents Riddle in this case.

This Court and the judge assigned to the Detroit Case held a joint hearing on the

government’s motion. (See doc. 50). At this hearing, both Riddle and Waters sought to

waive their constitutional right to conflict-free representation. Following this hearing, the

government expressed its belief that Waters voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently

waived her right to conflict-free representation. The Court agrees. Thus, Convertino

may continue representing Waters in this case.
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 5, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon counsel of record on this date by ordinary

mail and/or electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 47194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended 
to discuss personnel matters, the disclosure of which would constitute 
a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    Date: September 22, 2008.
    Open: 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To discuss intramural clinical research operational and 
funding issues.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and discuss personnel matters.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Maureen E Gormley, Executive Secretary, Mark O. 
Hatfield Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 10, Room 6-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-2897.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice.
    The statement should include the name, address, telephone number 
and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the 
interested person. In the interest of security, NIH has instituted 
stringent procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor 
vehicles, including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be 
inspected before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to 
show one form of identification (for example, a government-issued 
photo ID, driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of 
their visit.

    Dated: August 6, 2008.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-18659 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4084

To amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

to provide for Native Hawaiian organizations, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1996

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to provide for Native Hawaiian organizations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIVE AMERICAN

4 GRAVES PROTECTION AND REPATRIATION

5 ACT.

6 (a) WRITTEN CONSENT REQUIRED IF NATIVE AMER7 ICAN REMAINS ARE EXCAVATED OR REMOVED FOR PUR8 POSES OF STUDY.—Section 3(c) of the Native American

9 Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C.

10 3002(c)) is amended—
2

•HR 4084 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

2 end of the paragraph;

3 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and

4 inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new

6 paragraph:

7 ‘‘(5) in the case of any intentional excavation or

8 removal of Native American human remains for pur9 poses of study, such remains are excavated or re10 moved after written consent is obtained from—

11 ‘‘(A) lineal descendants, if known or read12 ily ascertainable; or

13 ‘‘(B) the appropriate Indian tribe or Na14 tive Hawaiian organization.’’.

15 (b) REQUIREMENTS FOR INADVERTENT DISCOV16 ERIES.—Section 3(d) of the Native American Graves Pro17 tection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3002(d)) is

18 amended—

19 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘with respect

20 to tribal lands, if known or readily ascertainable,’’

21 and inserting a period and the following: ‘‘With re22 spect to tribal lands, such notification shall be pro23 vided to the appropriate Indian tribe or Native Ha24 waiian organization,’’; and
3

•HR 4084 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the

2 following: ‘‘Any person or entity that disposes of or

3 controls any such cultural item shall adhere to the

4 applicable requirements of subsection (c).’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-81276) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.(2) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-92143) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-120685) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc.(4) Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-97850) pertaining to the Employee Stock PurchasePlan of Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(5) Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 33-94378) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment Planof Southwest Bancorp, Inc.of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofSouthwest Bancorp, Inc., with respect to Southwest Bancorp, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Southwest Bancorp, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form10-K) of Southwest Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLP
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual  Report of Bancorp Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-K for the  period  ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Darrell  J. Holm,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Darrell  J. Holm

By: Darrell  J. Holm

Chief Financial Officer

January 4, 2010
<PAGE>   1
                                                               Exhibit 10.81

                                     RECEIPT

         The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Quit Claim
Assignment of Rights to Common Stock, the Power of Attorney to Transfer Stock,
together with an Affidavit of Lost Stock Certificate with respect to Certificate
No. FTB5025 of Crown NorthCorp, Inc., a Quit Claim Assignment relating to
Strategic Realty Capital Corp., and the following certificates for shares of
Crown NorthCorp, Inc., with executed blank Powers of Attorney To Transfer Stock,
attached:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

CERTIFICATE NO.           CLASS                                    SHARES
---------------           -----                                    ------
<S>                      <C>                                      <C>
AA-1                      Series AA Convertible Preferred                 1
NC3223                    Common                                  1,000,000
FTB5013                   Common                                    140,255
FTB5014                   Common                                     10,681
</TABLE>


                                                   CROWN NORTHCORP, INC.



                                                    By:  /s/ H. E. Cooke
                                                       ----------------------
                                                    Its:  President & COO
                                                       ----------------------
                                                    Date: December 22, 1999
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFLM Minerals Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,George Heard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 10thday of April, 2008.



GEORGE HEARDGeorge HeardChief Executive Officer





















---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DON ZIMMERMAN,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF AUSTIN and SPENCER CRONK, 

in his Official Capacity as City Manager of 

the City of Austin,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00039-CV

Appeal from the

98th Judicial District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC# D-1-GN-19-005930)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant all costs of this appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with Amendment Number 2 to the Annual Report of Largo Vista Group,
      Ltd (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
      undersigned, Deng Shan, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 21, 2005





/s/
      Deng Shan


Deng
      Shan, Principal Executive Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6**  **511**

KENYA BASIL PARKER , P etitioner

- Appell ant ,

v.
V IRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00335

- LMB

- JFA )

Submitted : July 18, 2013 Decided: July 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kenya Basil Parker , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenya Basil Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denyin g as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)

. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Parker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materia ls before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### Arnold W. Schlichte v. John A. Donnegan.

Motion granted, with-ten dollars costs.