alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 23, 2008, Austin Pharma, 
LLC., 811 Paloma Drive, Suite A, Round Rock, Texas 78665-2402, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled 
substances listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)...........................  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Alphamethadol (9605).......................  I
Nabilone (7379)............................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Methadone Intermediate (9254)..............  II
Levo-alphacetylmethadol (9648).............  II
Alfentanil (9737)..........................  II
Remifentanil (9739)........................  II
Sufentanil (9740)..........................  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    In reference to drug code 7360 (Marihuana), the company plans to 
bulk manufacture cannabidiol as a synthetic intermediate. This 
controlled substance will be further synthesized to bulk manufacture a 
synthetic THC (7370). No other activity for this drug code is 
authorized for this registration.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or 
objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 
CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than October 6, 2008.

    Dated: July 30, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator/Deputy Chief of Operation, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-18046 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT
32.1 SARBANES OXLEY SECTION 906
  CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Extreme Home
Staging,  Inc. (the “Company”)  certifies, pursuant to her knowledge,
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter and nine
month ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information
contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Dated:  July 22,
 2008
 /s/ Milka
Fixler
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 24

- 00247

- CR

Jairo MARTINEZ , Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 454th Judicial District Court , Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 24

- 02

- 15061

- CR

- TDC Honorable Daniel J. Kindred , Judge Presiding
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ , JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. SIGNED June 5, 2024.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
EX-4.01





 Exhibit 4.01 

Description of the Registrant’s Securities 

Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

Loews Corporation has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: our Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share. 
 Description of Common Stock 

The following description of certain rights of our common stock does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to our certificate of incorporation and our by-laws and the applicable provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. 

Voting Rights. Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock they hold on all matters voted on by
shareholders, including elections of directors, and, except as otherwise required by law or provided in any resolution adopted by our board of directors with respect to any series of our preferred stock or any other class of our common stock
hereafter created, the holders of our common stock possess all voting power of our capital stock. 
 Elections of directors are decided by a
majority of the votes cast by holders of capital stock entitled to vote thereon in person or by proxy at a meeting, so long as a quorum is present, except that (i) contested elections of directors are decided by a plurality of votes cast by
holders of shares of capital stock entitled to vote thereon, and (ii) newly created directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors and vacancies occurring in the board of directors for any reason may be filled by vote of a
majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, at any meeting of the board of directors, or may be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares of capital stock entitled to vote in the election at a
special meeting of the shareholders called for that purpose. Except as provided by the Delaware General Corporation Law, all other matters to be voted upon by shareholders are decided by a majority of the votes cast by holders of shares of our
capital stock entitled to vote thereon in person or by proxy at a meeting, so long as a quorum is present. 
 Dividends and Liquidation
Rights. Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of preferred stock created by our board of directors hereafter, the holders of common stock are entitled to such dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board of
directors from funds available therefor, and, upon liquidation, holders of our common stock will share ratably in the funds remaining for distribution to our common shareholders. 

Miscellaneous. The outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and nonassessable. The common stock has no preemptive or
conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable thereto. 
 The common stock is listed for trading on
the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “L.” 
 The transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is
Computershare, P.O. Box 50500, Louisville, KY 40233-5000 (telephone: (800) 358-9151). 

  
 1
#### Joseph J. Jermyn, Respondent, v. Delaware and Eastern Railroad Company, Appellant. Joseph H. Holmes, Respondent, v. Delaware and Eastern Railroad Company, Appellant. Joseph H. Holmes, Respondent, v. Delaware and Eastern Railroad Company, Appellant.

(No. 1.)

(No. 2.)

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in each case. No opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 DAKTRONICS, INC.
 
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Daktronics, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the annual period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James B. Morgan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ James B. MorganJames B. MorganChief Executive OfficerJune 16, 2011
Order entered June 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01406-CR

JULIA BREAD CORNELIUS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-82257-2011

ORDER

This appeal is REINSTATED.

We VACATE our order of April 25, 2013 requiring the trial court to make findings of 

fact regarding why appellant’s brief was not filed. 

We GRANT appellant’s June 6, 2013 motion for leave to file a late appellant’s brief. 

Appellant’s brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court on June 6, 2013 is DEEMED timely filed as 

of the date of this order. 

The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**


**ACTING
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**


**AVRO
      ENERGY INC.**


**FORM
      10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2007**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Mike
      P. Kurtanjek , am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
      of Avro Energy Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering
      this
      certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
      Company for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 and filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                February 
                4, 2008By:
                */s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek*
              MIKE
                  P. KURTANJEK
              Chief
                Executive Officer, President, acting Chief Financial Officer, acting
                Principal Accounting Officer and Director
#### Dillman’s Appeal.

An agreement by counsel to quash appeal “with like effect as if the record from the court below, duly certified, had been brought up by the appellee, the appellant having failed to prepare a paper-book or to bring up the record, ” filed by leave of court, is sufficient where the case is properly in the supreme court; but such proceeding will be revoked where the case is not in the court.

Feb. 19, 1890.

Feb. 19, 1890.

Application to file agreement to quash appeal from O. C. Schuylkill Co. McCollum, J., absent.

The following agreement, signed by counsel, was presented to the court:

“ It is agreed that this appeal be quashed with like effect as if the record from the court below, duly certified, had been brought up by the appellee, the appellant having failed to prepare a paper-book or to bring up the record.”

*W. F. Shepherd,*for appellants: *A. W. Schalck,*for appellees.

Per Curiam,

Let the paper be filed. It is sufficient so to do.

The following entry is made on the prothonotary’s Minute Book, as of the same day:

The above action was afterwards revoked, the case not being in the court and no action being proper under such circumstances.

H. J. L.
#### Frank Gross, Respondent, v. Kathairo Chemical Company, Appellant.

Motion denied. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Rich, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### United States Parole Commission 

# Agency Holding Meeting:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission. 

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, August 14, 2008. 

# Place:

5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. 

# Status:

Open. 

# Matters to be Considered:

The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the open Parole Commission meeting: 

                    1. Approval of Minutes of May 2008 Quarterly Business Meeting                           ( print page 47243)    

2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and Section Administrators 

# Agency Contact:

Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990. 

Dated: August 6, 2008. 

Rockne J. Chickinell, 

General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. E8-18564 Filed 8-8-08; 3:30 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL JOHN GADDY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

C. E. DUCART, Associate Warden; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 15149

D.C. No. 4:18

- cv

- 04558

- HSG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 7, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Michael John Gaddy appeals pro se the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Eighth

Amendment and due process claims relating to the calculation of h is parole

eligibility date . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 21 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15149

a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A

. Wilhelm v. Rotman , 680 F.3d 1113, 1118

(9th Cir. 2012)

. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gaddy’s action because Gaddy failed

to allege facts sufficient to show that his parole eligibility date was miscalculated.

See Hebbe v. Pliler

, 627 F.3d 338, 341

- 42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se

pleadings are construed liberally, plaintiff must present factual allegations

sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); see also Cal. Penal Code § 1170.1(c)

(discussing aggregation of consecutive sentences for in

- prison offenses)

.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal

. Se e Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

Gaddy’s pending motion s (Docket Entry No s . 9 and 11 ) are denied as moot.

AFFIRM ED

.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIAM R. JOHNSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2451 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed December 12, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge. William R. Johnson, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Comer v. Moore, 817 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 2002); Benedetto v. State, 957 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Cookshot v. State, 846 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Sanchez v. State, 765 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Tiger v. State, 764 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)*




In connection with the Quarterly Report of SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned,
Kevin L. Foxx, President and Chief Executive Officer of SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C., and Alex G. Stallings, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C., certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.







/s/ Kevin L. Foxx


Kevin L. Foxx


President and Chief Executive Officer of


SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,


general partner of SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P.




August 24, 2009







/s/ Alex G. Stallings


Alex G. Stallings


Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of


SemGroup Energy Partners G.P., L.L.C.,


general partner of SemGroup Energy Partners, L.P.




August 24, 2009









*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the
Report.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51053 Summary Calendar

DAVID L HOWARD Plaintiff - Appellant LA FERIA A HOWARD; LYNDA S HOWARD; DAVID HOWARD, JR; TATSUO R HOWARD; YOUKO M HOWARD; PRECIOUS T HOWARD; PRINCESS M HOWARD Appellants

v. MICHAEL J ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant – Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CV-790
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 6, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51053 Summary Calendar

2 The only legal question before this court, and the only question over which we have jurisdiction, is the legal correctness of the district court’s judgment entered on August 1, 2007. That presents the question of whether substantial evidencesupports the Commissioner’s decision and computation of Mr. Howard’s Social Security benefits. This court agrees with the district court and affirms that judgment. AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

          - [Docket ID: USA-2008-0052] 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice to Delete a System of Records. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army is deleting a system of records in its existing inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on September 11, 2008 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to the Department of the Army, Records Management and Declassification Agency, Privacy Division, 7701 Telegraph Road, Alexandria, VA 22315. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Vicki Short at (703) 428-6508. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Army systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                 

The Department of Army proposes to delete a system of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports. 

Dated: August 1, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## A0037-1 DAPE 

### System name: 

Resource Management and Cost Accounting Files (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10002). 

### Reason: 

These records are now covered under notice T7905, Labor Cost and Reporting System (August 16, 2007, 72 FR 46040). 

 [FR Doc. E8-18588 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P