alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WYN-EX10.2_2014.3.31-Q1




Exhibit 10.2






AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


AMENDMENT, dated March 28, 2014 (“Amendment”), made to the Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto effective as of December 31, 2008, Amendment No. 2 thereto effective as of December 16, 2009, and Amendment No. 3 thereto effective as of March 1, 2011 (together, the “Employment Agreement”), by and between Wyndham Worldwide Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Geoff Ballotti (the “Executive”).  
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have previously entered into the Employment Agreement and desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date first written above, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
1.The second sentence of Section I of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with the following:
During the Period of Employment, the Executive shall serve as, Chief Executive Officer of Wyndham Hotel Group, LLC (the Company’s lodging business).
2.    The first sentence of Section II of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety and replaced with the following:
The period of the Executive’s employment under this Agreement (the “Period of Employment”) shall begin on the Effective Date and shall end on March 31, 2017, subject to earlier termination as provided in this Agreement. 
3.    From and after the date hereof, all references to the Employment Agreement shall mean the Employment Agreement as amended hereby. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby ratified and confirmed.  


[Signature Page Follows.]

1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amendment to be executed this 3rd day of March 2014.
EXECUTIVE


/s/ Geoff Ballotti                 
Geoff Ballotti


WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION 

 
By:  /s/ Mary Falvey                 
Name:    Mary Falvey 
Title:    Executive Vice President





2
----

----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| September                24, 2007 | /s/                Richard Ivanovick         |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              | Richard                Ivanovick                                                     |
|                              | Chief                Financial Officer                                               |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 434 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 434

  To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent the United States 
  Postal Service from disclosing the names or addresses of any postal 
       patrons or other persons, except under certain conditions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1995

  Mr. Condit introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent the United States 
  Postal Service from disclosing the names or addresses of any postal 
       patrons or other persons, except under certain conditions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Privacy Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR DISCLOSURE OF NAMES OR ADDRESSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 412 of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 412. Conditions for disclosure of names or addresses
    ``(a) No officer or employee of the Postal Service may make 
available to the public by any means or for any purpose any names or 
addresses (past or present) of postal patrons or other persons, except 
as provided under subsection (b) or as otherwise specifically provided 
by law.
    ``(b) The Postal Service shall prescribe such regulations as may be 
necessary to carry out this section. Under the regulations, no 
disclosure described in subsection (a) shall be allowable except if, or 
to the extent that--
            ``(1) the disclosure consists of information which--
                    ``(A) relates to a change of address; and
                    ``(B) was obtained from a person in accordance with 
                subsection (c);
            ``(2) permission to disclose has not been denied under 
        subsection (c)(2); and
            ``(3) the disclosure would contribute to the efficiency of 
        postal operations.
    ``(c) Any form used by the Postal Service to obtain information 
from a person relating to a change of address shall include--
            ``(1) notice of the Postal Service's information practices 
        under this section, including how, and to whom, any information 
        furnished on such form may be disclosed; and
            ``(2) a means for such person to deny permission for the 
        Postal Service to disclose any information furnished on such 
        form.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 4 of 
title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 412 and inserting the following:

``412. Conditions for disclosure of names or addresses.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46613-46614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12538-002]


Oologah Lake Dam Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit 
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To 
Intervene, and Competing Applications

August 4, 2008.
    On March 3, 2008, Oologah Lake Dam Hydro, LLC filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Oologah Lake Dam Hydroelectric Project, which 
would be located near the town of Oologah on the Verdigris River, in 
Rogers County, Oklahoma, on an existing dam owned and operated by the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The proposed project would utilize 
federal lands.
    The proposed project would use the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' 
Oologah Lake Dam and would consist of: (1) A proposed intake structure; 
(2) a proposed 200-foot-long, 19-foot-diameter steel penstock; (3) a 
proposed powerhouse containing two generating units having a total 
installed capacity of 25.7 MW; (4) a proposed 2-mile-long, 46-kV 
transmission line; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The project would 
have an annual generation of 71.5 gigawatt-hours which would be sold to 
a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Brent Smith, Chief Operating Officer, 
Symbiotics, LLC, P.O. Box 535, Rigby, ID 83442; phone: (208) 745-0834. 
FERC Contact: Tom Papsidero, 202-502-6002.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the Commission's

[[Page 46614]]

Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the 
docket number (P-12538) in the docket number field to access the 
document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18379 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Elias MADERE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Mrs. Amanda JACOB; wife of Ernest Jacob, Defendant and Appellee.

No. 14345.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

June 29, 1933.

Lubin F. Laurent, of New Orleans, and Lucien Troxler, of Reserve, for appellant.

C. A. Buchler, of Gretna, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Though this litigation has all the characteristics of a petitory action, counsel for the litigants agree that it is an action in boundary. The result sought to be obtained — the forcing of defendant to remove encroachments from land claimed to be owned by plaintiff — may, if plaintiff is correct, be ultimately obtained as the result of an action in •boundary, and we see no reason why the matter should not be proceeded with since the parties so desire.

Defendant, by exception of no cause of action in the court below, sought the absolute dismissal of the suit and asserted that, since this is an action in boundary, there should have been in the petition an allegation as to the necessity for the appointment of a surveyor, the contention being that, .under Civil Code, articles 833 and 841, a surveyor must be appointed in every boundary action and that, therefore, the failure to allege the necessity for the appointment is a fatal omission.

Plaintiff admitted that a surveyor must be appointed in every boundary action, but claimed that, since no boundary can be judicially fixed except after such appointment, the district judge must make the appointment, whether it is prayed for or not, and that it is not essential that such appointment be prayed for in the petition.

In the district court the exception of no cause of action was sustained and plaintiff’s suit dismissed.

When the matter was called for argument before us, counsel agreed that the case should be remanded to the district court to the end that plaintiff might make such allegation as defendant contends should be made. Since counsel have agreed that this shall be done, it is not necessary that we consider the question which was presented to the district court, and we feel that the ends of justice will be best served by remanding the matter so that the allegation which counsel agree *166shall be made may be made and so that the matter may then proceed as an action in boundary.

The judgment appealed from • is annulled, avoided, and reversed, and it is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the matter be remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed and according to law.

Reversed and remanded.
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.64


 


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. : 2013JIYINDAIZIDI13100914


 


Borrower
: Hebei Xuhua Trading Co., Ltd


Lender :
CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


Signing
Date : September 2, 2013


Loan Amount
: RMB30,000,000


 


Length of
maturity : From September 2, 2013 to September 2, 2014


Use of Loan
: Working Capital


Loan Interest : 6.6%


Date of
Draft :September 2, 2013


Withdrawal
Amount : RMB30,000,000


Payment Method : The interest should be repaid by monthly. The
principal shall be fully repaid at the maturity date of the loan.


Repayment
Date :September 2, 2014


 


Loan Guarantee : Guaranty of Pledge, Guaranty
of Mortgage


 


- Ganglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd entered into The Maximum
Mortgage Contract with the lender, with the contract no.2013JIYINZUIQUANZHIZIDI13140824.


 


- Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing Co., Ltd entered into The
Maximum Pledge Contract with the lender, with the contract no.2013JIYINZUIBAOZIDI13121740.


 


- LI YONG HUI entered into The Maximum Pledge Contract with
the lender, with the contract no.2013JIYINZUIBAOZIDI13121744.
Case 2:09-cv-12955-DML-MJH Document 21 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-12955-DML-MJH Document 21 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-12955-DML-MJH Document 21 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 3 of 3
#### Donnie Lee SLOAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 72-2876.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 28, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 1973.

Donnie Lee Sloan, pro se.

Crawford Martin, Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., for respondent-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GODBOLD and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Sloan filed a habeas corpus petition in the district court which was denied for failure to exhaust his available state remedies in view of the habeas petition filed in the 59th Judicial District Court for Grayson and Collin Counties, Texas. After the district court granted certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal *in forma pauperis,*the cause was docketed in this Court and now comes to us for appropriate disposition under Local Rule 9(c)(2).1

It has come to the attention of this Court that the appellant’s state habeas corpus petition was granted by the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas, that court having jurisdiction over the matter for purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing on the appellant’s ha-*678beas application pursuant to a venue change from Collin and Grayson Counties. Appellant’s four convictions were set aside and new trials have been ordered.

Since Sloan is no longer incarcerated by virtue of the allegedly unconstitutional convictions, the question of his exhaustion of state remedies is moot. *See*Merneigh v. Smith, 5th Cir. 1972 [No. 71-2274, February 7, 1972], The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this *pro se*case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9 (c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Aspect L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 27, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Equity One, Inc.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
For the year ended December 31, 2006
 Income from Continuing Operations
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    57,023Adjustments:Minority interest
    
    
    206Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    
    (1,650
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    65,057Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    3,308Capitalized interest
    
    
    (5,820
    )
    
    
    61,101Earnings, as defined
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    118,124Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    
    54,458Capitalized interest
    
    
    5,820Amortization of debt premiums/discounts
    
    
    3,289Amortization of loan fees
    
    
    1,490
    
    
    
    65,057Fixed Charges
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    65,057Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.82
#### Charles D. McAllister, Respondent, v. George A. Warfield, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Bich, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 475 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 475

 To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with stratospheric 
                           ozone protection.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 1995

  Mr. DeLay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal provisions of the Clean Air Act dealing with stratospheric 
                           ozone protection.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CLEAN AIR ACT PROVISIONS RELATING TO STRATOSPHERIC 
              OZONE PROTECTION.

    Title VI of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 and following) is 
hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 523

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the treatment

of certain bargain sales.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 13, 1995

Mr. ZIMMER (for himself, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. PALLONE, Mr.

BEILENSON, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BALDACCI, and Mr. EHLERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the treatment of certain bargain sales.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Land Preservation Tax

5 Fairness Act of 1995’’.

6 SECTION 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN BARGAIN SALES.

7 (a) BASIS ALLOCATION RULES.—Subsection (b) of

8 section 1011 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat-
2

HR 523 IH

1 ing to bargain sale to charitable organization) is amended

2 to read as follows:

3 ‘‘(b) BARGAIN SALE TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZA4 TION.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a deduction is allowable

6 under section 170 (relating to charitable contribu7 tions) by reason of a sale, then the adjusted basis

8 for determining gain from such a sale shall be that

9 portion of the adjusted basis which bears the same

10 ratio to the adjusted basis as the amount realized

11 bears to the fair market value of the property.

12 ‘‘(2) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN SALES OF

13 REAL PROPERTY.—If—

14 ‘‘(A) a deduction is allowable under section

15 170 by reason of any sale, and

16 ‘‘(B) such sale is a sale of real property (or

17 an interest therein) to a qualified organization

18 (as defined in section 170(h)),

19 paragraph (1) shall not apply and the entire ad20 justed basis of the property (or interest therein)

21 shall be taken into account in determining the

22 amount of gain from such sale. If the sale involves

23 an interest which is a restriction described in section

24 170(h)(2)(C), the entire adjusted basis of the prop25 erty to which the such restriction applies shall be
3

HR 523 IH

1 taken into account under the preceding sentences as

2 the adjusted basis of the interest.’’

3 (b) DETERMINATION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE.—

4 Section 170 of such code is amended by redesignating sub5 section (m) as subsection (n) and by inserting after sub6 section (1) the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(m) DETERMINATION OF VALUE OF CERTAIN RE8 STRICTIONS.—If any restriction described in subsection

9 (h)(2)(C) is sold to a qualified organization (as defined

10 in subsection (h)), for purposes of determining the amount

11 (if any) of the deduction allowable under this section with

12 respect to such sale, the fair market value of such restric13 tion shall be determined without regard to the amount

14 paid therefor even if such amount is determined in a com15 petitive fashion.’’

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

17 this section shall apply to sale after the date of the enact18 ment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1030 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1030

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the reduction 
 in the credit rate for certain facilities producing electricity from 
                          renewable resources.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2009

  Mrs. Lincoln (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the reduction 
 in the credit rate for certain facilities producing electricity from 
                          renewable resources.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REDUCED CREDIT RATE FOR PRODUCTION OF 
              ELECTRICITY FROM CERTAIN FACILITIES.

    Subparagraph (A) of section 45(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: 
``The preceding sentence shall not apply to electricity produced and 
sold after the date of the enactment of this sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```