alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or contacting the Office of Agreements (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov*).                 

*Agreement No.:*                     201170-001.                 

*Title:*                     The Los Angeles and Long Beach Port Infrastructure and Environmental Programs Cooperative Working Agreement.                 

*Parties:*                     Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach.                 

*Filing Party:*                     C. Jonathan Benner, Esq.; Troutman Sanders, LLP; 401 9th Street, Suite 1000; Washington, DC 20004-2134.                 

*Synopsis:*                     The agreement would lay out in additional detail the areas in which the Ports have agreed to discuss and cooperate to improve environmental, safety and security objectives, particularly their respective Clean Truck Programs. The parties request expedited review.                 

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission. 

Dated: August 5, 2008. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-18381 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc L. Baker, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/ Marc L. Baker             
|Marc L. Baker                 
|Acting Chief Financial Officer
|Dated: March 18, 2009         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management
Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11353 and #11354]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Texas (FEMA-1780-DR), dated 07/31/2008. *Incident:*
                         Hurricane Dolly. *Incident Period:*
                         07/22/2008 and continuing.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         07/31/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/30/2008. *Economic Injury (Eidl) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/01/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Mitravich, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 07/31/2008, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):* Cameron, Hidalgo, Willacy. *Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):* Texas: Brooks, Starr, Kenedy. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.375Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.687Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 113538 and for economic injury is 113540. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Herbert L. Mitchell, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E8-18443 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60279 Conference Calendar

ERIC FORD WASH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ROBERT L. JOHNSON, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WALTER BOOKER, Superintendent; JOHN H. BEARRY, Doctor, Doctor at Unit 42, Parchman, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:00-CV-226-P-D

- - - - - - - - - - October 25, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eric Ford Wash, Mississippi prisoner # 76258, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous. Wash argues that prison officials unconstitutionally denied medical treatment for problems with his tonsils, kidneys, and left leg. He further argues that the district court did not permit him to conduct adequate discovery. Wash also has filedNo. 01-60279 -2- motions for appointment of counsel and for a temporary restraining order. These motions are DENIED. Wash fails to demonstrate that the district court’s dismissal as frivolous was an abuse of discretion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Talib v. Gilley , 138 F.3d 211, 213 (5th Cir. 1998). He filed an identical claim in state court that was denied on the merits. Wash argues that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint should not be dismissed as res judicata because his state court filing was not a federal civil rights action, but merely a motion for a court order for surgery or additional tests. Under the Mississippi law of res judicata, the state court judgment had a preclusive effect on Wash’s filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint in federal court. See Migra v. Warren City School Dist. Bd. of Educ. , 465 U.S. 75, 84-85 (1984); Riley v. Moreland , 537 So. 2d 1348, 1354 (Miss. 1989). The fact that Wash sought monetary relief in the instant civil rights action but did not seek monetary relief in the prior state action does not bar the application of the doctrine of res judicata. See Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, Miss. , 701 F.2d 556, 559 (5th Cir. 1983). Wash’s appeal has no arguable basis in law or fact; therefore, it is DISMISSED as frivolous. See King v. Howard , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 counts as a strike against Wash. See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). This court’s dismissal counts as another strike. If Wash accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in formaNo. 01-60279 -3- pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED; MOTIONS DENIED.
***Exhibit32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of Infrastructure Developments Corp., for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof, I, Thomas Morgan, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: May 23, 2011

 

 

/s/ Thomas Morgan          

 

Thomas Morgan 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and willbe retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

** **

 

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.0


[LOGO] Arthur Andersen LLP
         Independent Public Accountants
         1345 Avenue of the Americas
         New York, NY  10105


                                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference in the Registration  Statements  (Nos.33-81278  and 333-20379) on Form
S-8 of  Reliance  Bancorp,  Inc of our report  dated July 21,  1999  included in
Reliance  Bancorp,  Inc's June 30,  1999  Annual  Report on Form 10-K and to all
references to our Firm included in these registrations statements.



/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
    Arthur Andersen LLP
    New York, NY  10105
    September 22, 1999


























                                                        96
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 536 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 69
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 536

                          [Report No. 104-46]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 15, 1995

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To prohibit the use of Highway 209 within the Delaware Water Gap 
National Recreation Area by certain commercial vehicles, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES.

    (a) In General.--Effective at noon on September 30, 2005, the use 
of Highway 209 within Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area by 
commercial vehicles, when such use is not connected with the operation 
of the recreation area, is prohibited, except as provided in subsection 
(b).
    (b) Local Business Use Protected.--Subsection (a) does not apply 
with respect to the use of commercial vehicles to serve businesses 
located within or in the vicinity of the recreation area, as determined 
by the Secretary.
    (c) Conforming Provisions.--(1) Paragraphs (1) through (3) of the 
third undesignated paragraph under the heading ``ADMINISTRATIVE 
PROVISIONS'' in chapter VII of title I of Public Law 98-63 (97 Stat. 
329) are repealed, effective September 30, 2005.
    (2) Prior to noon on September 30, 2005, the Secretary shall 
collect and utilize a commercial use fee from commercial vehicles in 
accordance with paragraphs (1) through (3) of such third undesignated 
paragraph. Such fee shall not exceed $25 per trip.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 69

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 536

                          [Report No. 104-46]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To prohibit the use of Highway 209 within the Delaware Water Gap 
National Recreation Area by certain commercial vehicles, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
JIM ISELEY

. yESIDING JUSTICE Order issued November 

# iq , 2012

In The 

## Tmtrt uf Apprab NMI! Elistrirt of &vats at Dallas

No. 05-11-01520-CV CONTINUUM HEALTH SERVICES, LCC, DR. DAN BARTEL, PATRICK LEE, AND MARK BAYARS, Appellants

V. SHEILA CROSS, Appellee 

### ORDER Before the Court is Appellants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Response to Appellee's Motion to Supplement Sur-Reply. We GRANT the motion and we ORDER appellants' amended response to appellee's motion to supplement sur-reply filed as of the date of this order.
TERRA MAR PROPERTY 

MANAGEMENT, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK 

MELLON FKA THE BANK OF 

NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE 

FOR THE 

CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF 

THE CWABS INC., ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, 

SERIES 2006-18,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5044

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 11, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

L. Haldane Taylor, Judge.

Alisa Dawn Wilkes of McKinney, Wilkes & Mee, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Shaib Y. Rios and Kerry A. Cummings of Brock & Scott, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
#### GUESS *&*ALBIN v. WORMAN et al.*

No. 4974.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

April 1, 1935.

E. R. Stoker, of Baton Rouge, for appellants.

H. W. Ayres, of Jonesboro, for appellee.

*

Rehearing granted May *2,*1935.

MILLS, Judge.

The record in this case, including the minutes of court, fails to show any motion for or order of appeal. These requirements are jurisdictional. In such a situation we are constrained to take notice of the omission and to dismiss the appeal of our own motion. Sammons v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 143 La. 731, 79 So. 320.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-208-000]


Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Technical Conference

July 28, 2008.
    On August 5, 2008, staff of the Office of Energy Projects (OEP) 
will hold a technical conference for the REX East Project. Rockies 
Express Pipeline LLC requested the Technical Conference to discuss 
compliance with Environmental Condition 147 of the Commission's May 30, 
2008 Order.
    The technical conference will be held on Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 
at 9 a.m. (EDT) in Room 3M-2B at the Commission Headquarters, 888 1st 
Street, NE., Washington, DC.
    Information concerning any changes to the above may be obtained 
from the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 502-8004 or 
toll free at 1-866-208-FERC (208-3372).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-17877 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 469 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 469

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of 
  the surviving spouse of a veteran after age 55 shall not result in 
         termination of dependency and indemnity compensation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 1995

Mr. Bilirakis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of 
  the surviving spouse of a veteran after age 55 shall not result in 
         termination of dependency and indemnity compensation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 103(d) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding the following new 
paragraph after paragraph (3):
    ``(4) The remarriage after age 55 of a surviving spouse of a 
veteran shall not bar payment of benefits under section 1311 of this 
title.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kristine K. DUNKER, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent.

No. 70313.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 18, 1997.

Walter S. Druseh, Lowes & Drusch, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kristine K. Dunker (“driver”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County sustaining the suspension of her driving privileges by respondent, the Director of Revenue for the State of Missouri (“Director”), for driving a motor vehicle while her blood alcohol content (“BAC”) was .10 percent or more. *See*RSMo § 302.505 (1994). We affirm.

Driver claims Director did not meet her burden of proof because she failed to prove driver’s blood was drawn in compliance with RSMo § 577.029 (1994), a requirement for the admission of blood test results. *See State v. Hanners,*774 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Mo.App. E.D.1989). However, driver did not object when her BAC was admitted into evi*664dence at trial. If evidence of a driver’s BAC is admitted without objection, the driver waives any objection to this evidence and it may be properly considered even if it would have been excluded upon a proper objection. *Reinert v. Director of Revenue,*894 S.W.2d 162, 164 (Mo.banc 1996). “In absence of a specific objection, the State’s failure to prove compliance with even a foundational requirement does not destroy the sufficiency of its case.” *Todd v. Lohman,*911 S.W.2d 321, 324 (Mo.App. W.D.1995) (citing *Reed v. Director of Revenue,*834 S.W.2d 834, 837 (Mo.App. E.D.1992)). As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsSamsonite Corporation:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-57014,333-128685, and 333-128684) on Form S-8 of Samsonite Corporation of ourreport dated April 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofSamsonite Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of January 31,2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2007, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, which report appears in the January 31, 2007annual report on Form 10-K of Samsonite Corporation.

Our report includes anexplanatory paragraph stating that, as discussed in note 13 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, Samsonite Corporation adopted Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, *Share Based Payment*,effective February 1, 2006. Also, as discussed in note 15, the Company adoptedSFAS No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined BenefitPension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No.87, 88, 106, and 132(R)*, effective January 31, 2007.

**KPMG LLP**

Denver, Colorado

April30, 2007

 

                                                                                                              

----
240 So.2d 695

#### In re Raymond C. POUCHER v. STATE. Ex parte Raymond C. Poucher, Jr.

3 Div. 467.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1970.

L. H. Walden, Montgomery, for petitioner.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Walter S. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

McCALL, Justice.

Petition of Raymond C. Poucher, Jr. for certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Poucher v. State, 46 Ala.App. 272, 240 So.2d 694 (3 Div. 31).

Writ denied.

SIMPSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH and MADDOX, JJ., concur.