alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2





302
CERTIFICATION





I, Robert
C. Ogden, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omni Bio Pharmaceutical,
Inc.





2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and





(d) Omitted #





5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) Omitted #





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




Date:  July
      31, 2009
                  /s/ Robert C. OgdenRobert
      C. OgdenChief
      Financial Officer


#
Pursuant to Division of Corporate Finance – Compliance and Disclosure
Interpretations – Regulation S-K, Section 215.02.  Items 308
and 308T – Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





PHC, Inc.


Peabody, MA.





We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-2246, 333-41494, 333-76137, 333-117146 and 222-141431) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-123842 and  333-149579) of PHC, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated September 28, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial
statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.














/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP


Boston, MA


September 28, 2009








-- 84 --
#### Scranton and Lehigh Coal Company, Respondent, v. Fiss, Doerr & Carroll Horse Company, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
#### BENEFICIAL PERSONNEL SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC. and Business Staffing, Inc. v. Ramon REY.

No. 96-0853.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1997.

Appeal from 143rd District Court, Ward County; Bob Parks, Judge.

Prior report: Tex.App., 927 S.W.2d 157.

The joint application for writ of error is granted without reference to the merits and the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated without reference to the merits. The cause is remanded to the court of appeals in accordance with the settlement agreement of the parties. The joint motion to remand is dismissed as moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 410 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 410

         For the relief of the estate of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Dickey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         For the relief of the estate of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to the estate of Wallace B. 
Sawyer, Jr., the sum of $608,715.40. The payment required by this 
section shall be in full satisfaction of all claims that the estate or 
family of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr., may have against the United States 
arising from the death of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr., following an October 
5, 1986, missile attack on the airplane in which he was a crewmember 
performing services for and at the direction of the United States.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

    It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 percent of the 
payment required by section 1 to be paid to or received by any agent or 
attorney for any service rendered in connection with the payment. Any 
person or estate violating this section shall be guilty of an 
infraction, and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in 
title 18, United States Code.

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
99.2
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Sona
Resources Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended March 31, 2009 and for
period from January 18, 2007 (date of inception) to March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ajeeta
Pinheiro, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.
 
 
 April
29,
2009                                                         AJEETA
PINHEIRO
 Ajeeta
Pinheiro
 Chief
Executive Officer,
 President
and Director
 
 
 
 
 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense. 

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on Tuesday, August 12, 2008; Tuesday, August 26, 2008; Tuesday, September 9, 2008; Tuesday, October 7, 2008; Tuesday, October 21, 1008; Tuesday, November 4, 2008; Tuesday, November 18, 2008; Tuesday, December 2, 2008; Tuesday, December 16, 2008; and Tuesday, December 30, 2008, at 10 a.m. in Room A101, 1400 Key Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence. 

However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention. 

Dated: August 1, 2008. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E8-18241 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Estelle Beyer, as Administratrix, etc., of Joseph Beyer, Deceased, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that there is no proof of negligence on the part of the defendant, and that the evidence as to the presence of gas in the water tank is purely speculative.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Tex as

October 4, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00226

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Lauro Eduardo RUIZ

, Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR4068

Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee ’ s second motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order

the brief due October 21, 2016.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of October, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### UNITED STATES of America v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PAWNEE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

No. 1691.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 11, 1938.

Chester A. Brewer, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okl.

Horace Ballaine, County Atty., of Pawnee, Okl., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
Exhibit (11) - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share and
                  Pro Forma Earnings Per Share (1999)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Year Ended September 30,
                                                       1999           1998           1997
                                              --------------  ------------- -------------
   <S>                                        <C>             <C>           <C>
   Average number of shares outstanding           8,976,640      8,307,342      7,876,906
                                              ============== =============  =============
   Net loss                                   $ (10,582,000) $ (10,404,000)  $ (5,302,000)
   Less:  amortization of redeemable
     preferred stock beneficial conversion
     discount                                 $           0  $           0  $  (2,222,000)

   Less:  cumulative dividend on
     redeemable preferred stock               $    (805,000)  $   (895,000) $    (385,000)
                                              --------------  ------------- -------------
   Loss applicable to common shares           $ (11,387,000) $ (11,299,000)  $ (7,909,000)
                                              ==============  ============= ==============

   Net loss per share                         $       (1.27)  $      (1.36) $       (1.00)
                                              ==============  ============= ==============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                   <C>                               <C>
SUBSIDIARY                            STATE OF INCORPORATION            DOES BUSINESS AS
------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ---------------------------
3057011 Canada, Inc.                  Ontario, Canada
Answer Iowa, Inc.                     Iowa                              Arch Paging
Arch Canada, Inc.                     Ontario, Canada
Arch Capitol District, Inc.           New York                          Page New York
Arch Communications Enterprises,      Delaware                          Arch Nationwide Paging
Inc.
                                                                        AD-VU
Arch Communications Services, Inc.    New York                          Arch Paging
Arch Connecticut Valley, Inc.         Massachusetts                     Arch Paging
Arch Michigan, Inc.                   Delaware                          Arch Paging
Arch Southeast Communications, Inc.   Delaware                          Arch Paging
Becker Beeper, Inc.                   Illinois                          Arch Paging
The Beeper Company of America, Inc.   Colorado                          Arch Paging
PCI Holding Company                   Pennsylvania                      Arch Paging
Per-Com Wireless Enterprises, Inc.    Ontario, Canada
Premiere Page of Kansas, Inc.         Kansas                            Arch Paging
Professional Communications, Inc.     Pennsylvania                      Arch Paging
(PA)
Professional Electronics, Inc.        Pennsylvania                      Arch Paging
Q Media Company - Paging, Inc.        Delaware                          Arch Paging
Q Media Company - Paging, Inc.        Kansas                            Arch Paging
Q Media Paging - Alabama, Inc.        Delaware                          Arch Paging
USA Mobile Communications, Inc. II    Delaware                          Arch Paging
USA Mobile Communications, Inc. III   Delaware                          Arch Paging
W.Q. Communications, Inc.             Kansas                            Arch Paging
The Westlink Company                  Delaware                          Arch Paging
The Westlink Paging Company of New    New Mexico                        Arch Paging
Mexico, Inc.
</TABLE>
2:09-cv-12473-PJD-MJH Doc # 76 Filed 03/31/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 632
EXHIBIT 10.45

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE

HEALTH NET, INC.

MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Health Net, Inc. Management Incentive Plan (the Plan) for the benefit of key employees of the
Company and its subsidiaries;

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to clarify that awards made under the Plan are
intended satisfy the short-term deferral exemption in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(b)(4); and

WHEREAS,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has the power to amend the Plan pursuant to Article IX thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Article IX of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



| | 1. | By striking the Section V(e) in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(e) Payment of Incentive Awards.

Incentive Awards shall be payable to Participants no later than March 15thfollowing the Plan Year in which an Incentive Award is
earned. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may permit a Participant to defer the receipt of an Incentive Award under a deferred compensation plan or plans of the Company, as may be in effect from time to time, in accordance with
rules and procedures established by the Senior Vice President Organization Effectiveness, and in a manner that satisfies the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Health Net, Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed on this 12th day of
November, 2008.



HEALTH NET, INC.By:

/s/ Karin MayhewName:

Karin MayhewTitle:

Senior Vice President, Organization Effectiveness
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not prec e dent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 1, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________ No. 05-30536

____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus RICHARD ROWAN, II, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:04-CR-60010

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * We VACATE Rowan’s sentence and REMAND to t h e district court for re-sentencing pursuant to United States v. Duhon , No. 05-30387 (5th Cir. Feb. 17, 2006).
| Date:  May 12, 2011                                        | By:    | /s/ Juhani Taskinen    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                                                                      |   | Juhani Taskinen             |   |
|                                                                      |   | Chief Executive Officer     |   |
|                                                                      |   |                        |   |
|            May 12, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Trupti Mehta            |   |
|                                                                      |   | Trupti Mehta                |   |
|                                                                      |   | Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
#### STATE OF MONTANA ex rel., DAVID ALLEN ROSS, Plaintiff and Respondent, *v.*VIRGINIA MALLORY, Justice of the Peace, Polson District, Lake County, Montana, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14887.

Submitted on Briefs Sept. 19, 1979.

Decided Oct. 2, 1979.

601 P.2d 385.

Turnage & McNeil, Poison, for plaintiff and respondent.

K. M. Bridenstine, Poison, for defendant and appellant.

MR. JUSTICE SHEEHY

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Relator, David Allen Ross was charged with two traffic offenses by citations issued on December 1, 1978. Ross was convicted of “reckless driving” and “leaving the scene of an accident” on January 8, 1979 after a nonjury trial in the Lake County Justice Court *30of Virginia Mallory, the appellant. On this same date, an oral notice of appeal was given to the Justice Court on behalf of Ross who posted an appeal bond as ordered.

On January 16, 1979, written notice of appeal addressed to the Justice Court was filed on behalf of Ross, inadvertently with the Clerk of the District Court. The Clerk who was newly elected, failed to forward the notice to the proper court. As a result, no written notice of intention to appeal was filed with the Justice Court within the ten day period following judgment as required by statute, nor was the record of the proceedings of the Justice Court transferred to the District Court. The appeal was dismissed and the bond ordered forfeited in Justice Court on April 6, 1979 by Justice of the Peace Mallory.

Ross applied to the District Court for a writ of mandate on April 19, 1979, directing Mallory to set aside the order for dismissal and to transmit the record and file to the District Court. A hearing was held on May 16, 1979 and on June 13, 1979 the District Court entered its findings and entered judgment that a writ of mandate be issued. Subsequently, a peremptory writ of mandate was issued on June 21, 1979 commanding Mallory to transmit the Justice Court records of the Ross proceeding to the District Court. Ross asserts on this appeal that the District Court erred in issuing the writ of mandate.

Section 46-17-311, MCA, states:

> “(1) All cases on appeal from justices’ . . . courts must be tried anew in the district court. . .

> “(2) The defendant may appeal to the district court by giving written notice of his intention to appeal within 10 days after judgment.

> “(3) Within 30 days, the entire record of the justices’ . . . court proceedings shall be transferred to the district court or the appeal shall be dismissed. It is the duty of the defendant to perfect the appeal.”

The statute is clear and expressly requires that “written” notice *31of appeal be filed in Justice Court. The duty to. perfect an appeal is also explicit and expressly directed to be that of the defendant.

In the present case, since written notice was not provided to the appropriate court, Ross did not perfect his appeal in the manner required by law and the Justice of the Peace had no concomitant duty to transmit the file to the District Court. Consequently there existed no basis for writ of mandate to be issued.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HASWELL and JUSTICES DALY, HARRISON and SHEA concur.
Denied and Opinion Filed July 12, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00823-CV IN RE RED BIRD TRAILS APARTMENTS, BRIDGEWAY CAPITAL, LLC, AND NCM MANAGEMENT, LTD, Relators Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00945-A MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Before the Court are relators’ July 11, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief. In th eir petition, relators seek to compel the trial court to grant them a ma ndatory continuance or, altern atively, to either exclude certain newly disclosed evidence or gran t a limited continuance and allow relators to conduct discovery on the newly disclose d evidence. In their emergency motion, relators seek to stay all trial court procee dings, including the July 15, 2024 jury trial, pending our action on the petition.–2– Entitlement to mandamus relief requires a relator to show the trial court clearly abused its discretion and the rela tor lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing relators’ petiti on and the record before us, we conclude relators have failed to demonstrat e entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). Having denied relato rs’ petition, we also deny as moot relators’ emergency motion.

240823F.P05 /Robbie Partida-Kipness / ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE