alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cathy KOEHRER, et. al., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE CO., Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69437.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Sept. 10, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 17, 1996.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 19, 1996.

Blair Drazic, Creve Coeur, for appellant.

Eugene K. Buckley, Eric D. Wright, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, C.J. and CRANDALL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this civil action, plaintiffs filed a two count petition against defendant, American Motorists Insurance Co., alleging breach of contract (Count I) and bad faith tort (Count II). The trial court dismissed Count II of plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that the tort of bad faith does not exist in Missouri with respect to first party claims by an insured against an insurance company.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3890 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3890

To provide for the withdrawal of most favored nation status from Iran, 
  Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and to provide for the restoration of such 
status with respect to Syria if the President determines that Syria is 
     participating in the Middle East peace process in good faith.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 1996

Mr. Scarborough (for himself, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Porter, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. 
Cunningham, and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the withdrawal of most favored nation status from Iran, 
  Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and to provide for the restoration of such 
status with respect to Syria if the President determines that Syria is 
     participating in the Middle East peace process in good faith.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF MOST FAVORED NATION STATUS FROM IRAN, IRAQ, 
              LIBYA, AND SYRIA.

    (a) Withdrawal of MFN Status.--Except as provided in subsection 
(b), nondiscriminatory treatment shall not apply with respect to any 
goods that--
            (1) are the product of Iran, Iraq, Libya, or Syria; and
            (2) are entered into the customs territory of the United 
        States on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act.
    (b) Restoration of Nondiscriminatory Treatment With Respect to 
Syria.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), the President may restore 
nondiscriminatory treatment to goods that are the product of Syria 30 
days after the President certifies to the Congress that the Government 
of Syria is participating in the Middle East peace process in good 
faith.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1078** 

In re: LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR. , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.

Submitted : May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order reversing the dismissals of his civil actions filed between 1997 and 2015 . We conclude that Wilder is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraor dinary circumstances. Kerr v. U .S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509,
516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Firs t Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.
1988 ). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Wilder is not available by way of mandamus. According ly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>           DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                             10,291 
<SECURITIES>                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                        0    
<ALLOWANCES>                         0    
<INVENTORY>                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     0    
<PP&E>                            495,519 
<DEPRECIATION>                     50,478 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    504,357 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                0    
<BONDS>                           202,013 
<COMMON>                              148 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0    
<PREFERRED>                            11 
<OTHER-SE>                        241,863 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      504,357 
<SALES>                              0    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   78,271 
<CGS>                                0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      58,906 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     0    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 11,916 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    16,368 
<INCOME-TAX>                         0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                16,368 
<DISCONTINUED>                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,118 
<CHANGES>                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                       15,250 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        1.11 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        1.11 
        


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000681

22-APR-2015

09:25 AM
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is published in accordance with section 9(a)(2) of 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463, as 
amended). Following consultation with the General Services 
Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the 
Interior (Secretary) is renewing the charter for the Glen Canyon Dam 
Adaptive Management Work Group. The purpose of the Adaptive Management 
Work Group is to advise and to provide recommendations to the Secretary 
with respect to the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and the exercise of 
other authorities pursuant to applicable Federal law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Whetton, 801-524-3880.
    The certification of renewal is published below.

Certification

    I hereby certify that Charter renewal of the Glen Canyon Dam 
Adaptive Management Work Group is in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the 
Interior.

Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E8-17587 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3967

To provide for a judicial remedy for disputes arising under certain agreements

with foreign entities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for a judicial remedy for disputes arising under

certain agreements with foreign entities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REMEDY TO ENFORCE CERTAIN AR4 BITRATION CLAUSES.

5 (a) JUDICIAL REMEDY.—Notwithstanding any other

6 provision of law, any person who has entered into any con7 tract, license, or other agreement with any foreign entity

8 before July 1, 1985, that contains a provision to settle

9 by arbitration any controversy arising out of such con10 tract, license, or other agreement, shall not be barred from
2

•HR 3967 IH

1 bringing an action in any court of competent jurisdiction

2 in the United States, including any Federal or State court,

3 or from seeking appropriate relief from any agency of the

4 United States, to resolve any controversy arising under

5 such contract, license, or other agreement.

6 (b) PERSON.—For purposes of this section, the term

7 ‘‘person’’ means—

8 (1) any natural person residing in the United

9 States; and

10 (2) any corporation, partnership, or other entity

11 organized under the laws of the United States.

12 SEC. 2. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

13 The right under section 1 to bring an action in a

14 court or to seek appropriate relief from an agency of the

15 United States applies only if the action is commenced, or

16 petition for relief is filed, within the 2-year period begin17 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FELIX WALLS,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC HOLDER, THERESA M.

HRYSHKO, and MARY F. WISNESKI,

Respondents.

 /

Case No. 09-13006

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER’S “MOTION FOR

COURT REPORTER[S] SOUND TAPE[S] PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 753(b)”

Petitioner, a federal prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361 on July 29, 2009. In the petition, Petitioner seeks to obtain

transcripts and recordings of his federal criminal trial in the District Court for the Eastern

District of Michigan over which the Honorable Robert H. Cleland presided. United

States v. Walls, No. 92-80236. Petitioner neither paid the filing fee for a civil action

($350.00) nor applied in the manner required by law to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Therefore, on August 25, 2009, this Court issued an Order of Deficiency for Prisoner

Civil Action, directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee or file the documents required under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs within thirty (30)

days from the date of the order. When Petitioner failed to correct the deficiency, this

Court dismissed this action without prejudice on October 13, 2009.

On July 30, 2010, Petitioner filed a “Motion for Court Reporter[s] Sound Tape[s]
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(b).” This Court must deny Petitioner’s motion without

prejudice. As set forth above, there is no pending action in which to file the motion due

to Petitioner’s failure to pay the filing fee or submit the documentation required to

proceed without prepayment of fees and costs. Petitioner cannot avoid the filing fee by

filing a motion seeking the same relief that he sought in his petition.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Petitioner’s “Motion for Court Reporter[s] Sound Tape[s]

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(b)” is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: August 17, 2010

Copy to:

Felix Walls, #02414-112

FCI Oxford

Federal Correctional Institution

P.O. Box 1000

Oxford, WI 53952
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 09-20215

Plaintiff, HONORABLE SEAN F. COX

United States District Judge

v.

D-2 JOSE CASTRO-RAMIREZ,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT LISTS 

AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S ORAL MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A LATE MOTION IN LIMINE

Jury trial in this matter is scheduled to begin on February 16, 2010. Per the Court’s

“Order Regarding Trial” [Doc. No. 207], the parties were to file motions in limine no later than

February 10, 2010, to be argued before the Court on February 12, 2010. At the February 12,

2010 hearing, several issues were brought to the attention of the Court. Specifically, both parties

voiced objections to the opposing party’s proposed exhibit list. Defense counsel also asked for

leave to file a late motion in limine challenging the admissibility of several of the Government’s

proposed exhibits. In light of these developments, the Court ORDERS as follows: 

1. Defense counsel is GRANTED leave to file a late motion in limine challenging the

admissibility of certain exhibits proposed by the Government. Such motion will

be governed by the Court’s usual motion practice guidelines, and must be filed no

later than Monday, February 15, 2010 at 10:00 am. 

2. Both parties are ORDERED to file, no later than Tuesday, February 16, 2010 at

9:00 am, a brief memorandum outlining the basis for each objection that party

has to the admission of exhibits proposed and listed on the opposing party’s

exhibit list. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.
2

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: February 12, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

February 12, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EMILY HARVEY,

Plaintiff, Case No. 08-15013

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [12]

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s November 5, 2009

Report and Recommendation [12]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed

the record and the pleadings, including Defendant’s Objections if any, the Court hereby

ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: December 17, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 17, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-15013-NGE-MJH Doc # 15 Filed 12/17/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 91
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4078 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4078

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel REGENT RAINBOW.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1996

  Mr. Tauzin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel REGENT RAINBOW.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), 
section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), section 
12106 of title 46, United States Code, section 506 of the Merchant 
Marine Act, 1936 (46 App. U.S.C. 1156), and any agreement with the 
United States Government, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a 
certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel REGENT RAINBOW 
(Bahamas official number 715557), after the completion of the sale of 
the REGENT RAINBOW to an operator of another passenger vessel measuring 
more that 20,000 gross tons that on the day before the date of the 
enactment of this Act is in operation with a coastwise endorsement.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skyview Holdings Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  November 1, 2007                  By:   /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
        ----------------                        ----------------------
                                                 Donald R. McKelvey, President
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:  November 1, 2007                  By:   /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
        ----------------                        ----------------------
                                                Donald R. McKelvey
                                                Principal Financial Officer
f8k041014a1ex10i_excelcorp.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT dated as of April 10, 2014 to the Securities Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), dated February 17, 2014, by and among Excel Corporation, Mychol Robirds, Steven Lemma, and Payprotec Oregon, LLC, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.


 


WITNESSETH:







WHEREAS, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the parties desire to amend the Exchange Agreement to extend the “Termination" period from March 31, 2012 to April 21, 2014. All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Exchange Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby agree as follows as follows:







1.           Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, the termination/closing date set forth in Sections 2.03 and 9.01(b) and 9.01(c) of the Exchange Agreement is hereby amended and extended from March 31, 2014 to April 21, 2014.







2.            EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AMENDED HEREBY, THE TERM SHEET AND ALL OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES THEREUNDER, SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.







3.           This amendment shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of New York as such laws are applied to agreements entered into and to be performed entirely within New York.







4.           This amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all such counterparts shall constitute one agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this Amendment to the Exchange Agreement as of the above date:








	
EXCEL CORPORATION

	  	PAPYPROTEC OREGON, LLC
	  	  	  	  	  
	
By:

	  	  	
By:

	  
	

Name:

	
 

	  	

Name:

	
 


	

Title:

	
 

	  	

Title:

	
 


	  	  	  	  	  
	By:  	  	  	By:	  
	 	


STEVEN LEMMA



	  	
 

	
MYCHOL ROBIRDS
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3868

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

through September 30, 1996.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 23, 1996

Mr. SCHAEFER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and

Conservation Act through September 30, 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT

4 AMENDMENTS.

5 The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amend6 ed—

7 (1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246)

8 to read as follows:
2

•HR 3868 IH

1 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

2 ‘‘SEC. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated

3 for fiscal year 1996 such sums as may be necessary to

4 implement this part.’’;

5 (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking

6 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert7 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1996’’; and

8 (3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42

9 U.S.C. 6276(h)) ‘‘There are authorized to be appro10 priated for fiscal year 1996 such sums as may be

11 necessary to carry out this part.’’; and

12 (4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking

13 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert14 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1996’’.

Æ
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed October 3, 2013 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01228-CV IN RE STEPHEN A. BERGENHOLTZ, Relator Original Proceeding from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366-51444-2008



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, O'Neill, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator contends the trial court erred in denyi ng a motion to transfer this case to Denton County. The facts and issues are well known to the pa rties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator = s petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief to stay underlying proceedings.

131228F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2016

t0914 

# Order

Clerk September 21, 2016

153375

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 153375

COA: 315774

Wayne CC: 12

- 001086

- FC

ANTON T. BLEVINS,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 11, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos.

152946

- 8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.