alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18203]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-14851-I, F-14851-M, F-14851-N; AK-964-1410-KC-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional 
Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Deering Ipnatchiak 
Corporation. The lands are in the vicinity of Deering, Alaska, and are 
located in:

Kateel River Meridian, Alaska

T. 6 N., R. 21 W.,
    Secs. 7, 18, and 19.

    Containing approximately 1,859 acres.

T. 7 N., R. 21 W.,
    Secs. 3, 8, 9, and 10;
    Secs. 16 and 17;
    Secs. 24, 25, 35, and 36.

    Containing approximately 6,400 acres.

    T. 8 N., R. 21 W.,
    Secs. 23 to 36, inclusive.

    Containing approximately 5,109 acres.
    Aggregating approximately 13,368 acres.

    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to NANA 
Regional Corporation, Inc. when the surface estate is conveyed to NANA 
Regional Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Deering Ipnatchiak 
Corporation. Notice of the decision will also be published four times 
in the Arctic Sounder.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until September 8, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by phone 
at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81e0eaafe3edecafe2eeeff7e4f8e0efe2e4c1e0eaafe3edecafe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bfaf0b5f9f7f6b5f8f4f5edfee2faf5f8fedbfaf0b5f9f7f6b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Hillary Woods,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E8-18203 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Abatement Order filed December 5, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00608-CV

____________

MOMENTUM CONTRACTORS, INC., FREDERICK ALLEN, JR. & JUDY 

ALLEN, Appellants

V.

TRI-TEMP REFRIGERATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-19727

ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on November 19, 2013 that appellants Frederick Allen and 

Judy Allen are in bankruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on 

November 19, 2013, Frederick Allen and Judy Allen petitioned for voluntary 

bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court under case number 

13-37143-H5-7. A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the 

bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in 
accordance with federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the 

appeal abated.

When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move 

the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the 

bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or 

terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. 

A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is 

required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).

For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the 

appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Michael Allen JONES, Defendant/Appellant. Michael Allen JONES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 68074, 70147.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 14, 1997.

Kent Denzel, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Kurt U. Schaefer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARYM. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of the class C felony of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080, RSMo Supp.1992. The court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to a prison term of fifteen years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An *879opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 31, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-1355

Lower Tribunal No. 17-14294

________________



### Linezka Torres and Jorge Navarro, as Parents and Legal Guardians

of Lucas Navarro, their minor son ,

Petitioners,

vs.



### Variety Children's Hospital, a Florida Not for Profit Corporation,

d/b/a Nicklaus Children's Hospital

,

Respondent.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dennis J.

Murphy

, Judge.

Goldberg & Rosen, P.A., and Judd G. Rosen and Mustafa H. Dandashly;

Eaton & Wolk, P.L.

, and Douglas F. Eaton, for petitioners.

Falk, Waas, Hernandez, Cortina, Solomon & Bonner, P.A., and Norman M.

Waas, Scott E. Solomon and Richard Warren, for respondent Variety Children’s

Hospital d/b/a Nicklaus Children’s Hospital; Radey Law Firm, and Thomas A.

Crabb and Lauren K. Thompson (Tallahassee), for Intervention Project for Nurses,

Inc.; Wicker Smith O’Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., and Alyssa M. Reiter and

Lindsey A. Hicks

, for Thomas James Sprufera, III

.Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SALTER and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Linezka Torres and Jorge Navarro, as parents and legal guardians of Lucas

Navarro, their minor son (collectively, “the plaintiffs”), seek certiorari review of

the order denying their request for an in camera inspection of a portion of Thomas

Sprufera’s patient file held by Intervention Project for Nurses, Inc. (“IPN”). We

grant the petition, quash the trial court’s order denying the plaintiffs’ request for an

in camera inspection, and direct the trial court to reconsider the plaintiffs’ motion

seeking an order from the trial court authorizing the release of these records

following its in camera inspection. 1

Certiorari granted; order quashed with directions.

1 This Court takes no position on the merits of the plaintiffs’ motion seeking an

order from the trial court authorizing IPN to release these documents.

2
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

ModusLink GlobalSolutions, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-71863,No. 333-90587, No. 333-93005 and No. 333-116417 on Form S-3 and No. 33-86742, No. 333-91117, No. 333-93189, No. 333-94479, No. 333-94645, No. 333-95977, No. 333-33864, No. 333-52636,No. 333-75598, No. 333-84648, No. 333-90608, No. 333-117878, No. 333-118596, No. 333-121235 and No. 333-131670 on Form S-8 of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc., formerly CMGI, Inc., of our reports datedOctober 14, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2009, which reports appear in the July 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K ofModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

October 14, 2009
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Juan Garza, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-14-00054-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

F-1230953-1). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to include an 

affirmative finding of family violence and the prior felony enhancement. As modified, the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Juan Garza, Jr., has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 30, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY WILSON,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-12939

v. HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

HUGH WOLFENBARGER,

Respondent.

____________________________________/

JUDGMENT

Petitioner Terry Wilson has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons set forth in an Opinion and Order issued this date,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for a writ of

habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DATE: March 22, 2010 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Terry Wilson, #137914

c/o Pontiac Parole Office

Jason Furst, Carolynn Wilson

1025 N. Perry St.

Pontiac, MI 48340

Laura A. Cook, Esq.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DETROIT MILLMEN'S FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS,

TRUSTEES OF DETROIT MILLMEN'S FRINGE

BENEFIT FUNDS, and INTERIOR SYSTEMS

LOCAL 1045,

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 09-CV-11117 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

MADEIRA WOODWORKING COMPANY, LLC,

PAUL C. GINGELL and FRANK MOCERI,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE

UPON DEFENDANT MOCERI (# 10)

Plaintiffs move for substituted service upon defendant Frank Moceri by posting a

copy of the summons and complaint at Moceri's last known address of 5970 Darb Lake

Road, West Bloomfield, Michigan, 48324, and by mailing the same by certified mail, return

receipt requested and by regular first-class mail to Moceri at this same address. Plaintiffs

proffer the affidavit of two process servers who attest that personal service upon Moceri at

5970 Darb Lake Road failed five times in July 2009.

Service upon an individual situated within this federal judicial district may be effected

pursuant to the law of Michigan. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Michigan law provides that "[o]n

a showing that service of process cannot reasonably be made as provided by this rule, the

court may by order permit service of process to be made in any other manner reasonably

2:09-cv-11117-GCS-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 49
2

calculated to give the defendant actual notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be

heard." M.C.R. 2.105(I)(1). 

Plaintiffs' motion for substituted service upon defendant Moceri is hereby GRANTED

to the extent that substituted service shall be accomplished by means of regular first-class

mail and by certified mail (return receipt requested), as well as by posting a copy of the

summons and complaint, civil cover sheet, and a copy of this Order at 5970 Darb Lake

Road, West Bloomfield, Michigan, 48324. 

 SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 27, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

August 27, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11117-GCS-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 50
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3583 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3583

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with respect to 
 research on breast cancer, for the increased involvement of advocates 
          in decision making at the National Cancer Institute.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 1996

  Mrs. Lowey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with respect to 
 research on breast cancer, for the increased involvement of advocates 
          in decision making at the National Cancer Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Involvement in Breast 
Cancer Research Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED INVOLVEMENT OF ADVOCATES IN DECISION MAKING REGARDING 
              RESEARCH ON BREAST CANCER.

    Section 417(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285a-
6(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:
            ``(3) Involvement of advocates in decision making.--
                    ``(A) The Director of the Institute shall, to the 
                extent practicable, provide for the increased 
                involvement (relative to fiscal year 1996) of advocates 
                in decision making at the Institute regarding research 
                on breast cancer.
                    ``(B) For purposes of this paragraph, the term 
                `advocate' means an individual who is accountable to, 
                represents, and reports back to organizations that 
                represent those affected by breast cancer.
                    ``(C) The Director of the Institute shall prepare a 
                report on the manner in which subparagraph (A) has been 
                carried out. The report shall be included in the first 
                report under section 407 that the Director submits 
                after the expiration of the one-year period beginning 
                on the date of the enactment of the Consumer 
                Involvement in Breast Cancer Research Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LARRY HILL,

Plaintiff,

v.

WARWICK DAVIS, et. al, 

Defendants.

___________________________________ /

CASE NO: 09-CV-13040

JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff filed a handwritten complaint on July 31, 2009 against defendants. Plaintiff’s

Complaint is recounted below in its entirety:

I[,] Larry Hill[,] Don[’]t want to go on No tunale [sic] Fight To Macomb

Detroit area Caddiex Moross [sic] About the Police Actor Dancer Poet committing

the rape organ Rip-off. 

I[,] Larry Hill[,] order 20 millions [sic] in twent[ies] in Larry Hill[’s] Bank[:]

Fifth Third Bank[,] 3201 Jefferson[,] Saving[s] Account [number redacted]. 

“[A] district court may, at any time, sua sponte dismiss a complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when the allegations

of a complaint are totally implausible, attenuated, unsubstantial, frivolous, devoid of merit, or no

longer open to discussion.” Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477, 479 (6th Cir. 1999). The Court finds that

Plaintiff’s Complaint is, on its face, frivolous and devoid of merit. 

2:09-cv-13040-PDB-MJH Doc # 4 Filed 08/11/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 9
2

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1).

SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 11, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

August 11, 2009.

s/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-13040-PDB-MJH Doc # 4 Filed 08/11/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 10
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated April 17, 2014, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-194167) of Smart Trust, New
York Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 7.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Grant
Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois


April 17, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1827]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-62,670]


Visteon Concordia VRAP, Concordia, MO; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 14, 2008 in response to a 
petition filed by the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace 
and Agricultural Implement Workers of America on behalf of workers of 
Visteon Concordia VRAP, Concordia, Missouri.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of January, 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-1827 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-20301-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

 v.

MICHAEL DONALD GRIMSHAW,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNTS ONE THROUGH FIVE, AND

TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on October 1, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on

October 1, 2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty. As of today’s

date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The

failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith

v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure

to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review

the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings

and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 7] is ADOPTED.

1:09-cr-20301-TLL-CEB Doc # 14 Filed 10/19/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 42
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to counts one through five is

ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 10] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: October 19, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on October 19, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:09-cr-20301-TLL-CEB Doc # 14 Filed 10/19/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 43
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01



                                  SUBSIDIARIES



   Concord Communications Securities Corporation
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA  01752
   State of incorporation: Massachusetts

   Concord Communications International, Inc.
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA 01752
   State of incorporation: Delaware

   CCA Holdings, Inc.
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA 01752
   State of incorporation: Delaware

   FirstSense Software, Inc.
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA 01752
   State of incorporation: Delaware

   Concord Communications FSC, Ltd.
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA 01752
   Organized under the laws of: Bermuda

   NetViz LLC
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA 01752
   State of incorporation: Delaware

   Vitel Software, Incorporated
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlborough, MA 01752
   State of incorporation: Massachusetts

   Aprisma Holdings, Inc.
   600 Nickerson Road
   Marlboro, MA 01752
   State of incorporation:  Delaware
Case 2:09-mc-50953-GER Document 1-2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:09-mc-50953-GER Document 1-2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 2 of 2
#### Gregory B. RIGGINS, Tammy Gains, Individually and as Next Friend of Chastity Gains a Minor, Appellants, v. LUCAS HEIGHTS VILLAGE APARTMENTS, et al., Respondents.

No. 68658.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Jan. 23, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 28, 1996.

Don R. Sherman, Goffstein, Kraus, Siegel & Sherman, St. Louis, for appellant.

*842Robert J. Benbenek, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Gregory B. Riggins, Tammy Gains, individually and as Next Friend of Chastity Gains, appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, granting respondents’, Lucas Heights Village Apartments, et ah, motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).