alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Report of
Uplift Nutrition, Inc. (the "Registrant") as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Gary C. Lewis, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:  (1) This Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and  (2) The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Registrant.    Date:
November 13,2008

By:
/s/Gary C.
LewisGary C. LewisPresident, and Chief
Executive Officer (CEO)   Date:
November 13,2008

By:
/s/ Gary C. LewisGary C. LewisPrincipal Financial Officer (CFO)
and
Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45

          Schedule of documents substantially similar to Exhibit 10.38

1    Real Estate Mortgage dated May 15, 2001 for Jameson Inn, Carrollton,
     Georgia; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating Lease; Assignment
     of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable Rate Note for
     $2,100,000

2.   Real Estate Mortgage dated March 28, 2001 for Jameson Inn, Tuscaloosa,
     Alabama; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating Lease; Assignment
     of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable Rate Note for
     $1,500,000; Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance

3.   Real Estate Mortgage dated February 15, 2001 for Jameson Inn,
     Greenwood, South Carolina; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating
     Lease; Assignment of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable
     Rate Note for $1,900,000

4.   Real Estate Mortgage dated February 15, 2001 for Jameson Inn, Easley,
     South Carolina; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating Lease;
     Assignment of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable Rate Note
     for $1,750,000

5.   Real Estate Mortgage dated February 6, 2001 for Jameson Inn, Decatur,
     Alabama; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating Lease; Assignment
     of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable Rate Note for
     $1,550,000; Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and Performance

6.   Real Estate Mortgage dated February 6, 2001 for Jameson Inn,
     Scottsboro, Alabama; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating
     Lease; Assignment of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable
     Rate Note for $1,700,000; Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and
     Performance

7.   Real Estate Mortgage dated February 6, 2001 for Jameson Inn, Forest
     City, North Carolina; Assignment of Lease; Assignment of Operating
     Lease; Assignment of Fees and Income; Security Agreement; Adjustable
     Rate Note for $1,650,000; Unconditional Guaranty of Payment and
     Performance
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Yapp Moi Lee, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of Mabcure Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      three month period ended March 31, 2008, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

|By:    | /s/ Yapp Moi Lee                               
|------ | -----------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Yapp Moi Lee                                   
|Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
|Date:  | May 20, 2008                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6142

FRED FREEMAN, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

WARDEN KINDAL; NURSE DELEON, HTC; DR. MCREE; MS. RINGOLD, 

PRN; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Sherri A. Lydon, District Judge. (9:21-cv-02199-SAL) 

Submitted: June 15, 2023 Decided: June 21, 2023

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Fred Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, Evan Michael Sobocinski, 

HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6142 Doc: 22 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Fred Freeman appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge, granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and dismissing his 

civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order. Freeman v. Warden Kindal, No. 9:21-cv-02199-SAL (D.S.C. Jan. 18, 2023). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6142 Doc: 22 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Christopher Edmunds,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-13076

Commissioner of Social Security, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER 

ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brought this action challenging a final decision of Defendant Commissioner

denying his application for disability and Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security

Act. Thereafter, both parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which were referred to

Magistrate Judge Mona Majzoub pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). On August 17, 2010,

Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued her Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), wherein she

recommends that: 1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted; and 2) Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment be denied.

Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a

matter by a Magistrate Judge must file objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after

being served with a copy of the R&R. “The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall

make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the

magistrate judge’s disposition to which specific written objection has been made.” Id. 

The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither

party has filed objections to the R&R.
2

The Court hereby ADOPTS the August 17, 2010 R&R. IT IS ORDERED that

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: September 14, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

September 14, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 7352

ROBERT BRUCE GILLINS, Petitioner

- Appellant,

v. WARDEN R. HUDGINS, Respondent

- Appellee, and
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY HAZELTON; DIRECTOR MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Bureau of Prisons , Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling

. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. ( 5:21

- cv - 00093

- JPB

- JPM )

Submitted : February 23, 2024 Decided: March 27, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Bruce Gillins , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7352 Doc: 23 Filed: 03/27/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Robert Bruce Gillins, a federal prisoner, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the execution of his sentence , arguing that his federal and state sentences should have run concurrently and that he was denied due process and equal protection with regard to sentencing credit . The district court denied relief, finding that Gillins had failed to exhaust administrative remedies and that , in any event, his due process claim failed on the merits. We dismissed Gillins’ appeal of that order as interlocutory because the district court had not addressed the equal protection claim. Gillins v. Hudgins , No. 22

- 6069, 2022 WL 1711685 (4th Cir. May 27, 2022). On remand, the district court concluded that Gillins had not fully exhausted his claim, that he failed to show exhaustion should be excused, and that, in any event, the equal protection claim lacked merit , noting that the federal judgment did not order the sentence to run concurrently with any other sentence

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s denial of Gillins’ due process and equal protection claims on the merits

. See generally 18 U.S.C. § 3584. Accordingly, we affirm

. Gillins v. Hudgins , No. 5:21

- cv - 00093

- JPB

- JPM (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 7, 2021;
Nov. 1, 2022)

. We grant Gillins’ motion to seal the motion and accompanying supplemental authority filed in October 2023, and we deny his motion to compel . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7352 Doc: 23 Filed: 03/27/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">A.C. Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Krystle Thomas, Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>MVAIC, Respondent. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Melissa Betancourt, P.C. (Melissa Betancourt of counsel), for appellant.Marshall &amp; Marshall, PLLC (Tracy Bader Pollak of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Odessa Kennedy, J.), entered February 20, 2018. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted a motion by defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Plaintiff, as assignee, was required to exhaust its remedies against all potential insurance carriers before seeking relief from defendant (<i>see Hauswirth v American Home Assur. Co.</i>, 244 AD2d 528 [1997]; <a href="../2017/2017_51778.htm" target="_blank"><i>Orlin &amp; Cohen Orthopedic Assoc. v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.</i>, 58 Misc 3d 132</a>[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 51778[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2017]). Here, plaintiff did not demonstrate that it had exhausted its remedies. As a result, plaintiff's claim is premature (<i>see Hauswirth</i>, 244 AD2d 528).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: October 18, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGan

Gordon F. DuGanChief Executive Officer
#### Miner L. HART, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 7438.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 8, 1938.

Paul D. Smith and Thos. H. Sutherland, both of Marion, Ohio, for appellant.

E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that under the allegations of appellant’s petition the District Court would have been without jurisdiction to review the findings of the United States Employees Compensation Commission in the controversy between appellant and appellee, and it was therefore without jurisdiction to entertain appellant’s petition for a declaratory decree under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Title 28, § 400 U.S.C.), and that the action of the court in dismissing the petition was not erroneous, it is ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 09-20326 

 

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds 

Anthony Knight, 

 Defendant. 

 / 

MOTION TO STRIKE AND 

REMOVE DOCKET ENTRY 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA respectfully requests that the court 

strike NOTICE of Penalty Enhancement by United States of America as to 

Anthony Knight, in the above-captioned matter and remove it from the ECF docket 

because the document (ECF 612) was filed under the wrong case. 

 WHEREFORE, the government respectfully requests that the Court strike 

the above-listed doc name and remove it from the ECF docket. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dawn N. Ison 

United States Attorney 

s/ John N. O Brien II 

John N. O Brien II 

Assistant United States Attorney 

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001 

Detroit, MI 48226 

john.obrien@usdoj.gov 

(313) 226-9715 

Dated: August 1, 2022 

Case 2:09-cr-20326-NGE-VMM ECF No. 613, PageID.2826 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 09-20326 

 

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds 

Anthony Knight, 

 Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER TO STRIKE AND 

REMOVE DOCKET ENTRY 

 This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion to strike 

NOTICE of Penalty Enhancement by United States of America as to Anthony 

Knight, because the document (ECF 612) was filed under the wrong case. The 

Court has reviewed the motion and finds that it should be granted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that government’s motion to strike NOTICE 

of Penalty Enhancement by United States of America as to Anthony Knight (ECF 

No. 612) is GRANTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that the NOTICE of Penalty Enhancement by United 

States of America as to Anthony Knight (ECF No. 612) is STRICKEN. 

 s/ Nancy G. Edmunds 

 Nancy G. Edmunds 

 United States District Judge 

Entered: August 1, 2022 

Case 2:09-cr-20326-NGE-VMM ECF No. 613, PageID.2827 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11288 and #11289]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 7.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1768-DR), dated 06/14/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/05/2008 and continuing through 07/25/2008.                    

*Effective Date:*                         07/25/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/13/2008.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/13/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Wisconsin, dated 06/14/2008 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/05/2008 and continuing through 07/25/2008.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-17769 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 23
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-81276) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan of
Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-92143) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of
Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-120685) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of
Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-97850) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 33-94378) pertaining to the Dividend Reinvestment Plan
of Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-147249) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Option Plan of
Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3, Nos. 333-151384 and 151384-3) pertaining to the Trust
Preferred Securities of Southwest Capital Trust II.(8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-155648) pertaining to the 2008 Stock Based Award
Plan of Southwest Bancorp, Inc.(9)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-156572) pertaining to the Capital Purchase Program
participation by Southwest Bancorp, Inc.
   
 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7782

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GLENN LENDALE JARRETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-89-355, CA-93-653-AM)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Lendale Jarrett, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Lendale Jarrett seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Jarrett, Nos. CR-89-355;

CA-93-653-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED