Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 45617 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD 

and Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 5100.1, which 

guide the Coast Guard in complying 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–

4370f), and have concluded, under the 

Instruction, that there are no factors in 

this case that would limit the use of a 

categorical exclusion under section 

2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this 

rule is categorically excluded, under 

figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the 

Instruction, from further environmental 

documentation. 

Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of 

the Instruction, an environmental 

analysis checklist and a categorical 

exclusion determination are not 

required for this rule because it 

concerns an emergency situation of less 

than 1 week in duration. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 

1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. A new temporary § 165.T07–0433 is 

added to read as follows: 

§ 165–T07–0433 Safety Zone, 2008 

Personal Watercraft Challenge, Atlantic 

Ocean, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 

(a) Regulated areas. Temporary safety 

zone for the 2008 Personal Watercraft 

Challenge in the Atlantic Ocean offshore 

in an area from Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

north to Hillsboro Inlet, Florida. The 

Coast Guard is establishing a temporary 

safety zone in and on the waters of the 

Atlantic Ocean. This safety zone 

includes all waters from the surface to 

the bottom, encompassed by an 

imaginary line connecting the following 

points: 26°15′09′′ N, 080°04′57.78′′ W, 

thence to 26°15′08.70′′ N, 080°04′47.82′′ 

W, thence to 26°06′20.88′′ N, 

080°06′01.50′′ W, thence to 26°06′20.76′′ 

N, 080°06′11.40′′ W, thence returning to 

origin. 

(b) Definitions. The following 

definitions apply to this section: 

Designated representative means 

Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, 

including Coast Guard coxswains, petty 

officers and other officers operating 

Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, State, 

and local officers designated by or 

assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP), 

Miami, Florida in the enforcement of 

regulated navigation areas, safety zones, 

and security zones. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23 of 

this part, no person or vessel may 

anchor, moor or transit a safety zone 

without permission of the Captain of the 

Port Miami, Florida or a designated 

representative. To request permission to 

enter into a safety zone, the Captain of 

the Port’s designated representative may 

be contacted on VHF channel 16. 

(2) At the completion of scheduled 

event, and departure of participants 

from the regulated area, the Coast Guard 

Patrol Commander may permit traffic to 

resume normal operations. 

(d) Effective Period. This temporary 

safety zone will be effective between the 

hours of 8 a.m. and 11 a.m., Saturday, 

August 16, 2008. 

Dated: July 15, 2008. 

J.O. Fitton, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Miami, FL. 

[FR Doc. E8–18079 Filed 8–5–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2008–0349] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Fireworks, Beverly, MA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is creating a 

temporary safety zone for a fireworks 

event being held in Beverly, 

Massachusetts. This safety zone will last 

for the limited duration of the fireworks. 

The zone is necessary to protect 

spectators, participants, and vessels 

from the hazards associated with 

fireworks displays. 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
45618 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. 

through 11 p.m. on August 10, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Comments and material 

received from the public, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, are part 

of docket USCG–2008–0349 and are 

available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. This material is 

also available for inspection or copying 

at two locations: the Docket 

Management Facility (M–30), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays, and the U.S. 

Coast Guard Sector Boston, 427 

Commercial St., Boston, MA 02109 

between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call 

Chief Petty Officer Eldridge McFadden 

at 617–223–5160. If you have questions 

on viewing the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information 

On June 4, 2008, we published a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

entitled Safety Zones; Fireworks, 

Central and Northern Massachusetts in 

the Federal Register (73 FR 31785). We 

received no letters commenting on the 

proposed rule. No public meeting was 

requested, and none was held. Under 5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds 

that good cause exists for making this 

rule effective less than 30 days after 

publication in the Federal Register. 

This rule must be in effect on August 

10, 2008, in order to protect the public 

from the dangers associated with 

fireworks displays. Any delay in the 

regulation’s effective date could expose 

the public to unnecessary danger and 

therefore be contrary to the public’s 

interest. 

Background and Purpose 

A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was 

published on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 

31785), proposing the establishment of 

six safety zones around various 

fireworks displays on or near navigable 

waterways in Massachusetts this 

summer. At this time, five of those 

events have already occurred. This 

temporary rule establishes a safety zone 

surrounding the remaining fireworks 

event as described in the NPRM. The 

zone will protect the maritime public 

from the dangers inherent in waterborne 

fireworks displays. The Captain of the 

Port does not anticipate any negative 

impact on vessel traffic due to 

implementation of these temporary 

safety zones. Public notifications will be 

made prior to the effective period of the 

zone via Broadcast and Local Notice to 

Mariners. 

Discussion of Comments and Changes 

No comments were made. However, 

the following changes were made to the 

original regulatory text proposed by the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

published on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 

31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) were 

removed as the events have occurred. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

No comments were made. However, 

the following changes were made to the 

original regulatory text proposed by the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

published on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 

31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) were 

removed as the events have occurred. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule would affect the following 

entities, some of which may be small 

entities: The owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit or anchor in 

the affected portion of the coastal 

waterways of Massachusetts between 9 

p.m. and 11 p.m. on August 10, 2008. 

This safety zone will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the following reasons: This rule would 

be in effect for only two hours, vessel 

traffic can navigate around the safety 

zone during the effective period, and 

advance notification via broadcast 

notice to mariners and Local Notice to 

Mariners will be made before and 

during the effective period. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

in the NPRM we offered to assist small 

entities in understanding the rule so 

that they could better evaluate its effects 

on them and participate in the 

rulemaking process. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 

1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). 

The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–

3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

No comments were made. However, 

the following changes were made to the 

original regulatory text proposed by the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

published on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 

31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) were 

removed as the events have occurred. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 45619 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this rule will not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. No comments were made. 

However, the following changes were 

made to the original regulatory text 

proposed by the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking published on June 4, 2008 

(73 FR 31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) 

were removed as the events have 

occurred. 

Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not effect a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. No comments 

were made. However, the following 

changes were made to the original 

regulatory text proposed by the Notice 

of Proposed Rulemaking published on 

June 4, 2008 (73 FR 31785): Items (a)(2) 

through (a)(6) were removed as the 

events have occurred. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. No 

comments were made. However, the 

following changes were made to the 

original regulatory text proposed by the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

published on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 

31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) were 

removed as the events have occurred. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. No 

comments were made. However, the 

following changes were made to the 

original regulatory text proposed by the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

published on June 4, 2008 (73 FR 

31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) were 

removed as the events have occurred. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. No comments were made. 

However, the following changes were 

made to the original regulatory text 

proposed by the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking published on June 4, 2008 

(73 FR 31785): Items (a)(2) through (a)(6) 

were removed as the events have 

occurred. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD 

and Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 5100.1, which 

guide the Coast Guard in complying 

with the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–

4370f), and have concluded, under the 

instruction, that there are no factors in 

this case that would limit the use of a 

categorical exclusion under section 

2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this 

rule is categorically excluded, under 

figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the 

Instruction, from further environmental 

documentation. 

A final environmental analysis 

checklist and a final categorical 

exclusion determination will be 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, and 

Waterways. 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T01–0349 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–0349 Safety Zone; Fireworks, 

Beverly, MA. 

(a) Location. The following 

waterborne fireworks events include 

safety zones as described herein: (1) 

Beverly Homecoming Fireworks Event, 

Beverly, MA. 

(i) All waters of Beverly Harbor, from 

surface to bottom, within a 200-yard 

radius of the fireworks barge located at 

approximate position 42°32′37′′ N, 

070°52′09′′ W. These coordinates are 

based upon NAD83 datum. 

(ii) Effective Date. This rule will be 

effective from 9 p.m. through 11 p.m. on 

August 10, 2008. 

(b) Definition: As used in this section, 

designated representative means any 

Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or 

petty officer, or any Federal, State, or 

local law enforcement officer authorized 

to enforce this regulation on behalf of 

the Coast Guard Captain of the Port 

(COTP). 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in section 165.23 

of this part, entry into or remaining in 

the safety zones described in paragraph 

(a) of this section is prohibited unless 

authorized by the Coast Guard Captain 

of the Port (COTP) Boston, or the 

COTP’s designated representative. 

(2) Persons desiring to transit within 

the safety zones established in this 

section may contact the Captain of the 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
45620 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 152 / Wednesday, August 6, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 

Port at telephone number 617–223–3008 

or via on-scene patrol personnel on VHF 

channel 16 to seek permission to do so. 

If permission is granted, all persons and 

vessels must comply with the 

instructions of the Captain of the Port or 

his or her designated representative. 

Dated: July 24, 2008. 

Claudia C. Gelzer, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting 

Captain of the Port Boston, Massachusetts. 

[FR Doc. E8–18076 Filed 8–5–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 174 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0830; FRL–8374–2] 

Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa Proteins 

in Corn and Cotton; Exemption from 

the Requirement of a Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of the Bacillus 

thuringiensis Vip3Aa proteins in or on 

the food and feed commodities of corn; 

corn, field; corn, sweet; corn, pop; and 

cotton; cotton, undelinted seed; cotton, 

refined oil; cotton, meal; cotton, hay; 

cotton, hulls; cotton, forage; and cotton, 

gin byproducts, when used as plantincorporated protectants in those food 

and feed commodities. Syngenta Seeds, 

Inc. submitted a petition to EPA under 

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food 

Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), 

requesting an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance. This 

regulation eliminates the need to 

establish a maximum permissible level 

for residues of Bacillus thuringiensis 

Vip3Aa proteins in or on corn; corn, 

field; corn, sweet; corn, pop; and cotton, 

undelinted seed; cotton, refined oil; 

cotton, meal; cotton, hay; cotton, hulls; 

cotton, forage; and cotton, gin 

byproducts, when applied or used as 

plant-incorporated protectants. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

August 6, 2008. Objections and requests 

for hearings must be received on or 

before October 6, 2008, and must be 

filed in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under docket 

identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–

OPP–2007–0830. To access the 

electronic docket, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced 

Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert 

the docket ID number where indicated 

and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow 

the instructions on the regulations.gov 

website to view the docket index or 

access available documents. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the docket index available in 

regulations.gov. Although listed in the 

index, some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available in the electronic docket at 

http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. 

to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The Docket 

Facility telephone number is (703) 305–

5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alan Reynolds, Biopesticides and 

Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 605–0515; e-mail address: 

reynolds.alan@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action Apply to Me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 

affected entities may include, but are 

not limited to: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

This listing is not intended to be 

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide 

for readers regarding entities likely to be 

affected by this action. Other types of 

entities not listed in this unit could also 

be affected. The North American 

Industrial Classification System 

(NAICS) codes have been provided to 

assist you and others in determining 

whether this action might apply to 

certain entities. If you have any 

questions regarding the applicability of 

this action to a particular entity, consult 

the person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies 

of this Document? 

In addition to accessing an electronic 

copy of this Federal Register document 

through the electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, you may access 

this ‘‘Federal Register’’ document 

electronically through the EPA Internet 

under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at 

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may 

also access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s pilot e-CFR site at http:// 

www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr. 

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing 

Request? 

Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, as 

amended by FQPA, any person may file 

an objection to any aspect of this 

regulation and may also request a 

hearing on those objections. The EPA 

procedural regulations which govern the 

submission of objections and requests 

for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. 

You must file your objection or request 

a hearing on this regulation in 

accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–

OPP–2007–0830 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

requests must be in writing, and must be 

mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk 

on or before October 6, 2008. 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing that does not 

contain any CBI for inclusion in the 

public docket that is described in 

ADDRESSES. Information not marked 

confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 

may be disclosed publicly by EPA 

without prior notice. Submit your 

copies, identified by docket ID number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0830, by one of 

the following methods. 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket’s 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES