alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Concord
Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Melissa H. Cruz, Executive Vice
President, Business Services, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.     The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
|
| | 2.     The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ MELISSA H. CRUZ                             
| |                                                 
| | Melissa H. Cruz                                 
| | Executive Vice President, Business
    Services,
| | Chief Financial Officer and
    Treasurer       

March 15, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO.09-13337

MELVIN CHRISTIAN,

Plaintiff(s),

-VWELLS FARGO BANK, ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

PARTIAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

At a session of said Court, held in the 

United States Courthouse, in the City of 

Detroit, State of Michigan, on the 11th

day of February, 2010.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J.DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Due notice of an Order to Show Cause why the above case should not be

dismissed for failure to serve defendant(s) within 120 days after the filing of the

complaint, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, has been mailed to counsel of record. No response to the Order to Show

Cause has been filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled case be, and hereby is

DISMISSED as to defendant Argent Mortgage only.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: February 11, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on February 11, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager
#### William K. Gilchrist v. Jacob G. Lang and Others.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
#### John Jaburg and Another v. Haserot Canneries Company.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
#### Yvonne E. SPRENGER, Respondent, v. Stanley J. SPRENGER, Appellant.

No. 69269.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 24, 1996.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, A Renae Adam-son, Asst. Public Defenders, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARYM. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stanley J. Sprenger (“husband”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County dissolving his marriage to respondent, Yvonne E. Sprenger (“wife”), insofar as it divided the parties’ marital property, and ordered husband to pay wife’s attorney’s fees. Husband also appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Franklin County ordering him to pay wife’s attorney’s fees on appeal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is provided solely for the use of the parties involved.
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



PHC, Inc.
Peabody, MA

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No.'s,  333-2246,  333-41494 and 333-76137) and Form S-8
(No.  333-102402)  of PHC, Inc. of our report dated August 8, 2003,  relating to
the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, MA

September 18, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.3





STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q/A Report for the nine months ended September 30, 2013(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.,


Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer


Dated: January 22, 2014
EXHIBIT 13.2
                                                                   ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

       In  connection  with the report of Vasogen Inc.  (the  "Company") on the
Form  20-F for the  fiscal  year  ended  November  30,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Paul
J. Van  Damme,  Vice  President,  Finance  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of my
knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
     Company.


/s/ Paul J. Van Damme
-------------------------------------
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer),
Vasogen Inc.

January 30, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

VIRGIL MITCHELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES

and DR. ZAKIUDDIN A. KHAN,

Defendants.

/

Case No. 09-11467

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order entered on August 08, 2012,

judgment is entered in favor of defendant Correctional Medical Services only and against

plaintiff.

DAVID WEAVER

Dated: August 8, 2012 By: s/Julie Owens 

 Deputy Clerk

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, August 8, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 

2:09-cv-11467-AC-CEB Doc # 113 Filed 08/08/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 783
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-08-022]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: August 11, 2008 at 11 a.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E. Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-453 and 731-TA-1136-1137 (Final)(Sodium Nitrite 
from China and Germany)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is 
currently scheduled to transmit its determinations and Commissioners' 
opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before August 20, 2008.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    (1) Document No. GC-08-147: Final disposition of Inv. No. 337-TA-
487 (Certain Agricultural Vehicles and Components Thereof).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier announcement of this meetings 
was not possible.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 5, 2008.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E8-18326 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE RAMON SORIANO, JR.,

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00072-CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Maria Salas-Mendoza, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso 

County, Texas, and concludes Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We 

therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                        ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                AVRO ENERGY INC.
          FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mike P. Kurtanjek , am the Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial
Officer  of Avro  Energy  Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company").  I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 and filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2008
                                    By: /s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       MIKE P. KURTANJEK
                                       Chief Executive Officer, President,
                                       acting Chief Financial Officer,
                                       acting Principal Accounting Officer and
                                       Director
1

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

No. 96-11016

Summary Calendar.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Larry Allen RESSLER, Defendant-Appellant.

Sept. 22, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Texas.

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On March 7, 1996, Ressler, federal prisoner No. 22047-077,

filed the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, which was his second.

Ressler argued that his two prior convictions for "house breaking"

were not burglaries and thus not "crimes of violence" as defined

under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). He contended that he had not presented

this claim earlier because his counsel had not investigated the

nature of the prior convictions and he did not learn of the

statutory definition until after he had filed his first § 2255

motion.

The government answered and argued that Ressler was

procedurally barred from raising this issue because he could have

raised it on direct appeal or in his first § 2255 motion but he had

not done so and had not shown either cause or prejudice for the

default. The government further argued that his claim was

meritless because the elements of "house breaking" satisfied the
2

elements of "generic burglary" as defined in Taylor v. United

States, 495 U.S. 575, 599, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 2158-59, 109 L.Ed.2d 607

(1990), and his convictions were thus crimes of violence under §

924(e).

The district court dismissed Ressler's successive § 2255

motion because Ressler had not first obtained permission from a

Judge of the Court of Appeals to file a successive § 2255 as

required by the provisions of AEDPA, enacted on April 24, 1996. 28

U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). The district court applied the amended

version of § 2244 to Ressler's successive § 2255 motion even though

Ressler filed his motion before the AEDPA was signed.

Ressler timely appealed and requested this Court to issue a

Certificate of Appealability (COA). This Court granted Ressler a

COA limited to the question of the district court's application of

AEDPA to his pending § 2255 motion. On June 23, 1997, the Supreme

Court issued its opinion in Lindh v. Murphy, --- U.S. ----, 117

S.Ct. 2059, 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997), which establishes the rules and

criteria for determining whether the provisions of AEDPA would be

applied to cases pending prior to the effective date of that Act.

On July 14, another panel of the Fifth Circuit held that under

Lindh v. Murphy the requirement for certification by the Court of

Appeals of a successive application under § 2255 does not apply

because the petitioner's application was pending on April 24, 1996,

the date AEDPA was enacted. Williams v. Cain, 117 F.3d 863 (5th

Cir.1997). Ressler's petition in this case was likewise pending on

the effective date of AEDPA.
3

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and

this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings

under the law as it existed prior to the adoption of AEDPA.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132181(31) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132181 COA: 270373 St. Joseph CC: 00-010301-FC COY LEE WHITTEN, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s December 28, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-20452

RADHWAN AL-MARSOUMI,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO MODIFY THE TERMS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

Defendant Radhwan Al-Marsoumi violated the terms of his probation and, on

September 28, 2012, was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment and two years of

supervised release. Defendant moves to modify the terms of his supervised release

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2). Defendant seeks to reduce his supervised release

term to one year and to remove all travel restrictions so that he may receive medical

treatment for his seizures. As Defendant is presently incarcerated, however, the motion

is premature. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to modify the terms of supervised

release [Dkt. # 12] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 20, 2013
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\09-20452.AL-MARSOUMI.Deny.Without.Prejudice.Modify.Supervised.Release.wpd

2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, June 20, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ January 2, 2018 ERRATUM

______________________ Appeal Nos. 2017 - 1499, 2017 - 1500, 2017 - 1558, 2017 - 1559 ALLERGAN SALES, LLC,

Plaintiff - Cross - Appellant v. SANDOZ, INC., ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH, LTD. , Defendants - Appellants De cided: December 22, 2017 Nonp recedential Opinion

______________________ P lease make the following change : On page 8, line 34, replace “titrate” with “tartrate.”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case Number 09-20403-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

v.

D-3 JOSEPH DALE BRAXTON,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE OF

COUNT ONE OF THE SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT, AND TAKING THE

RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on May 19, 2010, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. Judge Binder issued his report on May 19, 2010,

recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty as to a lesser included offense

of count one of the second superseding indictment. As of today’s date, no party has filed any

objections to Judge Binder’s report and recommendation. The election to not file objections to the

report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.

140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation [Dkt. # 64] is

ADOPTED.
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to a lesser included offense of

count one of the second superseding indictment is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement

[Dkt. # 61] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: June 28, 2010

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on June 28, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
        
<S>                                                               <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                                             8,337
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    281,800 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0 
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 290,137
<PP&E>                                                            14,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    (7,355)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 4,431,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          1,205,497
<BONDS>                                                                0 
<COMMON>                                                      12,252,597 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0   
<PREFERRED>                                                        1,500 
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (9,029,955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   4,431,639
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    388,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               1,077,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               54,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (1,466,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (1,466,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0 
<CHANGES>                                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,466,118)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       (.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.43)
         


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATEMENT
OF MANAGING DIRECTOR


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Richard
J. DeGarmo, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the nine months ended September 20, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.








/s/
Richard J. DeGarmo


Richard
J. DeGarmo, Managing Director


Dated:
November 20, 2009