alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RICHARD GAVITT, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 09-12796

Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., 

Defendant. 

 /

ORDER TO REMAND IN PART

Plaintiff filed his complaint in the 46th District Court on June 25, 2009. Defendant timely

removed the action to this Court on July 15, 2009, based on federal-question jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1331. Plaintiff’s complaint contains the following two counts:

Count I Violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.

Count II Violations of the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §

445.252, and the Michigan Occupational Code, Mich. Comp. Laws §

339.915

The Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over Count I because it arises under federal law.

28 U.S.C. § 1331. Count II, however, is based on state law. Although the Court has supplemental

jurisdiction over state-law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a), the Court may decline to exercise

supplemental jurisdiction if there are “compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction.” Id. §

1367(c)(4). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state-law claim

in this matter. The Court finds that the contemporaneous presentation of Plaintiff’s parallel state

claim for relief will result in the undue confusion of the jury. See id.; see also Padilla v. City of

Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309, 1315 (E.D. Mich. 1994). 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s state-law claim (Count II) is hereby

2:09-cv-12796-LPZ-RSW Doc # 6 Filed 07/31/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 45
2

REMANDED to the 46th District Court. The Court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s federal

claims (Count I).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 31, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of record

by electronic or U.S. mail on July 31, 2009.

s/Marie E. Verlinde 

Case Manager

(810) 984-3290

2:09-cv-12796-LPZ-RSW Doc # 6 Filed 07/31/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 46
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PHC, Inc.
Peabody, MA.

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No's. 333-2246, 333-41494, 333-76137 and 333-117146) and
Form S-8 (No's  333-102402  and  333-123842)  of PHC,  Inc. of our report  dated
August 23, 2005,  relating to the consolidated  financial  statements as of June
30,  2005 and for each of the two years then ended,  which  appears in this form
10-K.






/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP
Boston, MA
October 10, 2006



                                    -- 89 --
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1720

___________________________

Pamela Jeanette Smith

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

The Curators of the University of Missouri

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

 ____________

 Submitted: February 27, 2020

Filed: March 3, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Pamela Smith appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment

in her employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’

1The Honorable Willie J. Epps, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the

Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was proper. See

Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing grant of summary

judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
#### In the Interest of J.M.C., J.S.C., J.D.C. and J.M.C.

No. 66094.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 18, 1995.

Robert L. Brown, Arnold, for appellant.

Theodore R. Allen, Jr., Hillsboro, for Juvenile Div.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the circuit court’s termination of her parental rights in four minor children. We affirm. The judgment of the juvenile court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
|   **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vitaly Melnikov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: */s/ Vitaly Melnikov*Vitaly MelnikovChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerOctober 18, 2012
                 
              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4024

To require approval of an application for compensation for the death of

Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 4, 1996

Mr. DICKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require approval of an application for compensation for

the death of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF APPLICATION.

4 Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr., who died on October 5, 1986,

5 shall be deemed to have been an employee of the United

6 States Government in the performance of his duties at the

7 time of his death for the purpose of determining eligibility

8 for compensation for his death under section 8102 of title

9 5, United States Code, and the application for such com10 pensation which was filed on February 5, 1988, on behalf
2

•HR 4024 IH

1 of Kasanee Sawyer, widow of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr., shall

2 be approved.

3 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON COMPENSATION.

4 A claim or award for compensation for legal or other

5 services rendered in connection with obtaining relief au6 thorized by section 1 shall be valid only if approved by

7 the Secretary of Labor, any contract to the contrary not8 withstanding.

Æ
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 419

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Received, read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

MARCH 15, 1996

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 419 RCS

1 SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

2 (a) FINDING.—The Congress finds that Benchmark

3 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily per4 formed emergency work after the Northridge earthquake,

5 but has not been reimbursed as a result of a technicality

6 under California State law.

7 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to fairly

8 compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for

9 which, except for the technicality under California State

10 law, it would otherwise have been paid under the provi11 sions of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer12 gency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121).

13 SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

15 date of enactment of this Act, the director of the Federal

16 Emergency Management Agency shall pay to Benchmark

17 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an amount equal

18 to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.,

19 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the

20 State of California to compensate Benchmark Rail Group,

21 Inc., for the emergency work and services performed at

22 the request of the Southern California Regional Rail Au23 thority, to the extent that such work and services are oth24 erwise eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T.

25 Stafford Disaster and Emergency Assistance Act (42
3

•HR 419 RCS

1 U.S.C. 5121). The payment shall be made from funds ap2 propriated to implement such Act.

3 (b) DEOBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Federal Emer4 gency Management Agency shall deobligate an equal

5 amount to that obligated previously for payment to the

6 State of California to cover the costs of work performed

7 for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority by

8 Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., after the Northridge earth9 quake which would have been eligible for reimbursement

10 under such Act.

Passed the House of Representatives December 19,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Northern
Empire Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Cocks
-----------------
    Jeffrey Cocks
    President/CFO


Date  May 17, 2010
      ------------


<PAGE>
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard BROWN, Appellant.

No. 70340.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 7, 1997.

Nadine Valeria Nunn, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Burmudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Richard Brown, appeals the judgment of conviction for unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030.1(1) (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Case 4:09-cv-13283-MAG-MAR   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.95   Filed 01/28/10   Page 1 of 4

Case 4:09-cv-13283-MAG-MAR   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.96   Filed 01/28/10   Page 2 of 4

Case 4:09-cv-13283-MAG-MAR   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.97   Filed 01/28/10   Page 3 of 4

Case 4:09-cv-13283-MAG-MAR   ECF No. 14-3, PageID.98   Filed 01/28/10   Page 4 of 4
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6814
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE LEE BURKE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-119, CA-97-498-K) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Lee Burke, Appellant Pro Se. Jan Paul Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal from the district court's orders dismissing for failure to obtain autho rization pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West Supp. 1997), his second motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Burke , Nos. CR-91-119; CA-97-498-K (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 30, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 44137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17462]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 147 / Wednesday, July 30, 2008 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 44137]]



FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 652

RIN 3052-AC36


Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation Funding and Fiscal 
Affairs; Risk-Based Capital Requirements; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency), through the 
FCA Board (Board), issued a final rule under part 652 on June 5, 2008 
(73 FR 31937) amending our capital regulations governing the Federal 
Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, 
the effective date of the final rule is 30 days from the date of 
publication in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses 
of Congress are in session. Based on the records of the sessions of 
Congress, the effective date of the regulations is July 25, 2008.

DATES: Effective Date: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 652 
published on June 5, 2008 (73 FR 31937) is effective July 25, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
Joseph T. Connor, Associate Director for Policy and Analysis, Office of 
Secondary Market Oversight, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4280, TTY (703) 883-4434, or
Rebecca S. Orlich, Senior Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Farm 
Credit Administration, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, (703) 883-4420, TTY 
(703) 883-4020.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a)(9) and (10))

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. E8-17462 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000914435
<NAME> HEADWAY CORPORATE RESOURCES
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                       958
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,412
<PP&E>                                           8,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,846
<BONDS>                                         73,273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,419
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,742
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  344,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   504
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,084
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,785
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4118

To amend the Antiquities Act to limit the authority of the President to

designate areas in excess of 5,000 acres as national monuments, and

for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1996

Mr. HANSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Antiquities Act to limit the authority of the

President to designate areas in excess of 5,000 acres

as national monuments, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION OF ANTIQUITIES ACT AUTHORITY.

4 Section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 (34 Stat. 225;

5 16 U.S.C 431, 432, 433), commonly known as the Antiq6 uities Act, is amended by adding the following at the end

7 thereof: ‘‘The President may not exercise the authority of

8 this section to declare any area in excess of 5,000 acres

9 to be a national monument.’’
2

•HR 4118 IH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT.

2 The amendment made by section 1 of this Act shall

3 apply with respect to any proclamation issued by the

4 President after January 1, 1996.

Æ
# Martin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom L.L.P.

__________________________________________ ATTORNEYS AT LAW

__________________________________________

808 Travis Street • 20th Floor • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713

- 632

- 1700 • Fax: 713

- 222

- 0101 • www.mdjwlaw.com

Levon G. Hovnatanian

M ANAGING P ARTNER
Direct: ( 713 ) 632

- 17 40

e- mail: hovnatanian @mdjwlaw.com July 24 , 2015

Mr. Chr istoph er A. Pr in e
, Cl er k

F ou rt ee nth C ou r t of Ap p ea ls

301 Fa nnin, R oom 245
Houston, T exa s 77002

Re: Cau se No. 14

- 15

- 000 93-CV; S tate F arm Ll oy ds v. Gi nge r Ha n so n ; in

t he Fourt ee nth Court of A pp e als

Dear M r. Prine:

This letter replies to the R esponse to State Farm Lloyds’s Motion for Fourth

Extension of Time to File Brief

.

In her Response, Ms. Hanson asserts that State Farm’s counsel filed the appellee’s brief in Feaster on June 5, not June 24. Response at 6. That is correct. It was the appellant’s reply brief that was filed on June 24 in Feaster . What State

Farm’s motion should have stated is that Mr. Hovnatanian assist ed in the preparation of, and, on June 22 , 2015, the filing of real party in interest United

Services Automobile Association d/b/a USAA’s Brief on the Merits in Cause No.

14

- 1006; In re Stacey Bent and Mark Bent ; in the Supreme Court of Texas. The undersigned apologize s for the mistake

.

Very truly yours,

M ARTIN

, D ISIERE

, J EFFERSON & W ISDOM

, L.L.P.

/s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian

Levon G. Hovnatanian Appellate Counsel for State Farm Lloyds

LGH:dsb ACCEPTED
14-15-00093-CV
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS
7/24/2015 5:55:28 PM
CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKMartin, Disiere, Jefferson & Wisdom

_____________ ATTORNEYS AT LAW

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mr. C h r istoph e r A. P r in e
, C l er k Fourteenth Court of Appeals July 24 , 2015 Page 2

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

This is to certify that this computer

- generated letter contains 122 words.

/s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian

Levon G. Hovnatanian Dated: July 24 , 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing letter has been forwarded to the individual(s) listed below, by the meth od indicated, on this 24 th day of July

, 2015:

Mr. Richard D. Daly rdaly@dalyblack.com

Mr. John Black jblack@dalyblack.com

R ICHARD D ALY L AW F IRM 2211 Norfolk Street, Ste. 800 Houston, Texas 77098 (via e

- filing and e

- mail) (Attorneys for appellee Ginger Ha nson)

/s/ Levon G. Hovnatanian

Levon G. Hovnatanian