alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| UV FLU TECHNOLOGIES, INC |
|--------------------------|
|                     |   |
| By:                      | /s/ John J. Lennon |
| Name:                    | John J. Lennon |
| Title:                   | President, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board(Principal Executive Officer) |

| By:    | /s/ John J. Lennon                                                                                                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | John J. Lennon                                                                                                           |
| Title: | President, Chief Financial Officer andChairman of the Board(Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer) |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER
31, 1999 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,721                   5,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,148                  40,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,867)                   (572)
<INVENTORY>                                        762                     740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,237                  48,907
<PP&E>                                          11,495                   5,595
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,260)                 (1,266)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,920                 200,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,712                  40,027
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           151                     120
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,664                 113,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,920                 200,642
<SALES>                                         62,839                  76,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               200,206                 168,833
<CGS>                                           56,821                  69,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,960                 114,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149,865                  42,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,427                     314
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,030                   (593)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (96,076)                  12,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,257)                   6,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (91,819)                   5,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (184)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (92,003)                   5,533
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.82)                    0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.82)                    0.51


</TABLE>
=================================================================

This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 216 

Trathony Griffin and Michael 

Godwin,

 Appellants,

 v.

Sirva, Inc. and Allied Van Lines, 

Inc.

 Respondents.

Stuart L. Lichten, for appellants.

George W. Wright, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals

for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of this

Court's Rules of Practice, accepted and the issues presented are

to be considered after briefing and argument. Chief Judge

DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and

Garcia concur.

Decided September 20, 2016
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4187

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Lincoln National

Historic Trail as a component of the National Trails System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Mr. WELLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the

Lincoln National Historic Trail as a component of the

National Trails System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16

5 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding the following new

6 paragraph at the end thereof:

7 ‘‘( ) The Lincoln National Historic Trail, a

8 trail of approximately 350 miles extending from

9 Lake Michigan to the Mississippi River, as generally

10 described in ‘The Proposal’ in the Department of
2

•HR 4187 IH

1 the Interior report entitled ‘Illinois Trail, National

2 Trail Feasibility Study and Environmental Assess3 ment’, dated September 1987, with an extension of

4 the water route down the Mississippi River to con5 nect with the Lewis and Clark National Historic

6 Trail near Wood River, Illinois, and with an exten7 sion of the water route down the Sangamon River

8 from Beardstown to Springfield. A map generally

9 depicting the route shall be on file and available for

10 public inspection in the Office of the Director of the

11 National Park Service, Washington, District of Co12 lumbia. The trail shall be administered by the Sec13 retary of the Interior.’’.

Æ
#### DELAWARE & H. R. CORPORATION v. BONZIK, and five other cases.

Nos. 6587-6592.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 22, 1938.

Paul Bedford, of Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (Joseph Rasch and Thomas L. Ennis, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

R. L. Levy and A. M. Lucks, both of Scranton, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In the court below the plaintiffs brought suit against the defendant railroad to recover damages suffered by them while riding on a freight train, through the alleged negligence of the railroad. The court refused the defendant’s request *960to give binding instructions and submitted the case to the jury. It, however, failed to agree. Thereupon, defendant moved for judgment n. o. v., which the court refused and'granted a new trial. Following this the railroad took these appeals.

 Without discussing the facts or indicating any opinion on the defendant’s motion, we regard the cases before us as appeals from the court’s grant of a new trial. In the absence of abuse of discretion, which cannot be contended in these cases, and regarding them as appeals from the grant of a new trial, no appeal lies, and accordingly the appeals are dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - [Bulletin FMR 2008-B5] 

# AGENCY:

General Services Administration. 

      ( print page 46272)    

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This bulletin cancels GSA Bulletin FMR Bulletin 2006-B5, Real Property Asset Management Principles, published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on June 16, 2006, that introduced new Guiding Principles case studies to help Federal agencies manage and improve real property performance effectively in support of Executive Order 13327, “Federal Real Property Asset Management.” This bulletin updates the case studies to provide current asset management examples and best practices.                     

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

August 8, 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further clarification of content, contact Stanley C. Langfeld, Director, Regulations Management Division (MPR), General Services Administration, Washington, DC 20405; or                         *stanley.langfeld@gsa.gov*.                     

Dated: July 28, 2008. 

Kevin Messner, 

Acting Associate Administrator,  Office of Governmentwide Policy.

      ( print page 46273)          ( print page 46274)          ( print page 46275)          ( print page 46276)          ( print page 46277)          ( print page 46278)          ( print page 46279)          ( print page 46280)          ( print page 46281)          ( print page 46282)          ( print page 46283)          ( print page 46284)          ( print page 46285)          ( print page 46286)          ( print page 46287)          ( print page 46288)          ( print page 46289)          ( print page 46290)          ( print page 46291)          ( print page 46292)          ( print page 46293)          ( print page 46294)          ( print page 46295)          ( print page 46296)          ( print page 46297)    

BILLING CODE 6820-RH-P

[FR Doc. E8-18350 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820-RH-C
H. R. 4083

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act through

September 30, 1997.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT AMENDMENTS.

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amended—

(1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246) to read as

follows:

‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

‘‘SEC. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal

year 1997 such sums as may be necessary to implement this part.’’;

(2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking ‘‘June 30,

1996’’ both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof

‘‘September 30, 1997’’;

(3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42 U.S.C.

6276(h)) ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal

year 1997 such sums as may be necessary to carry out this

part.’’; and

(4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking ‘‘June 30,

1996’’ both places it appears and inserting in lieu thereof

‘‘September 30, 1997’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Masaaki (John) Nishibori, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ MASAAKI (JOHN) NISHIBORIMasaaki (John) Nishibori President and Chief
Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Mrs. Edna Hogan BRYANT, Administratrix of the Estate of Ernest Floyd Hogan, and Mrs. Ellen Stultz Hogan, Beneficiary, Appellees.

No. 7410.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 9, 1938.

Horace Frierson, Jr., U. S. Atty. and A. O. Denning, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Nashville, Tenn., and Julius C. Martin, Wilbur C. Pickett and Young M. Smith, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Roberts & Roberts, of Nashville, Tenn., for appellees.

Before HICKS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and DRUFFEL, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was substantial evidence- that the veteran Ernest Floyd Hogan became permanently and totally disabled during the life of the war risk policy “sued on, and it further appearing that the question of whether he became totally and permanently disabled on July 15, 1919, or between that date and October 1, 1924, was not properly preserved *1020for review, either hy request for a specific finding or by exception or by an assignment of error, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed.
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:09-cv-13249-TLL-CEB Document 27-27 Filed 09/10/2009 Page 9 of 9
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11118 (Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERRY WISER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:96-CR-089-D)

- - - - - - - - - - December 31, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that court-appointed counsel’s motion for leave

to file an out-of-time brief is GRANTED. Counsel is reminded of his duty to meet court-imposed deadlines. Court-appointed counsel for Jerry Wiser has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief, the points raised by Wiser
in response to that brief, and the record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from furtherNo. -2- responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


STATEMENT OF MANAGING DIRECTOR
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Alan Schaffner, Managing Director of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:
 
 The Company’s Form 10-Q/A Report for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Alan Schaffner
 Alan Schaffner, Managing Director
 Dated:  December 30, 2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICKY FRANKLIN,

Petitioner, Case Number 09-13466

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

JEFF WOODS,

Respondent.

_____________________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR BOND PENDING DETERMINATION

OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

This matter is before the Court on the petitioner’s motion for bond pending determination

of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

On November 14, 1995, petitioner Ricky Franklin was convicted by a jury in Oakland

County Circuit Court of one count of conspiracy to make or deliver more than 650 grams of cocaine.

He was sentenced to life without parole.

On September 1, 2009, Franklin filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition

presents claims relating to: (1) ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel; (2) offering of

perjured testimony by the prosecutor; (3) denial of the petitioner’s request to strike an in-court

identification; and (4) denial of the petitioner’s motion for a directed verdict. Franklin also alleges

that: (1) there are “inconsistencies between the video tape of the trial and the trial transcripts”; and

(2) a key prosecution witness lied in his testimony. Petition at 3.

On August 24, 2012, the petitioner filed a motion for bond pending the determination of his

petition. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23 governs release or detention of a prisoner, state

or federal, who is collaterally attacking his or her criminal conviction. United States v. Cornish, 89

2:09-cv-13466-DML-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 08/31/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2354
-2-

Fed. App’x 569, 570 (6th Cir. 2004). A prisoner seeking release from custody under Rule 23 must

demonstrate (1) a substantial claim of law based on the facts surrounding the petition; and (2) the

existence of some circumstances making the motion for bail exceptional and deserving of special

treatment in the interests of justice. Dotson v. Clark, 900 F.2d 77, 79 (6th Cir.1990). The finding

of a substantial question alone does not justify a grant of bail pending the Court’s decision on the

merits of the petition. Lee v. Jabe, 989 F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir.1993).

The Court has reviewed the petition and the motion for bail and finds that the petitioner has

not shown the existence of a substantial question of law, and he has not shown circumstances

making his request for bail exceptional and deserving of special treatment in the interests of justice.

The Court will therefore deny the motion.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for bail pending the determination

of his petition [dkt. #15] is DENIED.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: August 31, 2012

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on August 31, 2012.

s/Deborah R. Tofil 

DEBORAH R. TOFIL

2:09-cv-13466-DML-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 08/31/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2355
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACTI, Alexios Komninos, Chief Financial Officer of Seanergy Maritime Corp., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Seanergy Maritime Corp.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors:     a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:November 14, 2007 /s/ Alexios Komninos     Alexios Komninos  (Principal Financial Officer)
21