alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jerry BOYD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 70250.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 18, 1997.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jerry Boyd, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4033

To amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known

as the Paperwork Reduction Act, to ensure that Federal agencies give

priority to reducing paperwork burdens on small businesses having 50

or fewer employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Paperwork Reduction Act, to ensure

that Federal agencies give priority to reducing paperwork

burdens on small businesses having 50 or fewer employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4033 IH

1 SECTION 1. PRIORITY TO REDUCING PAPERWORK BUR2 DENS ON CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESSES.

3 Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly

4 known as the Paperwork Reduction Act, is amended as

5 follows:

6 (1) Section 3501(1) is amended by inserting

7 ‘‘microenterprises,’’ after ‘‘small businesses,’’.

8 (2) Section 3502 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’

9 after the semicolon at the end of paragraph (13)(D),

10 by striking the period at the end of paragraph (14)

11 and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the

12 following new paragraph:

13 ‘‘(15) the term ‘microenterprise’ means a per14 son—

15 ‘‘(A) engaged in business solely in the

16 United States or its territories; and

17 ‘‘(B) that employs 50 or fewer individ18 uals.’’.

19 (3) Section 3504 is amended—

20 (A) in subsection (a)(1)(B)(i) by inserting

21 ‘‘, especially burden affecting microenterprises’’

22 before the semicolon at the end;

23 (B) in subsection (c)(3) by inserting ‘‘,

24 microenterprises,’’ after ‘‘individuals’’; and

25 (C) in subsection (c)(5) by inserting ‘‘,

26 with a particular emphasis on potential harmful
3

•HR 4033 IH

1 effects on microenterprises’’ before the period

2 at the end.

3 (4) Section 3505(a)(2) is amended by inserting

4 ‘‘on individuals, microenterprises, and entities most

5 adversely affected’’ before the semicolon.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re: Refrigerant Compressors

Antitrust Litigation

/

Case No. 2:09-md-02042

Hon. Sean F. Cox

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Kimberly L. Scott of the law firm of Miller, Canfield, 

Paddock and Stone, P.L.C., has this day entered an appearance as attorney of record for Plaintiff, 

General Electric Company, in the above entitled cause.

Respectfully submitted,

MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C.

By: /s/ Kimberly L. Scott

Carl H. von Ende (P21867)

Kimberly L. Scott (P69706)

101 N. Main St., 7th Floor

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1400

Telephone: (734) 668-7696

Facsimile: (734) 747-7147

vonende@millercanfield.com

scott@millercanfield.com

David M. Schnorrenberg (D.C. Bar No. 458774)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: (202) 624-2500

Facsimile: (202) 628-5116

dschnorrenberg@crowell.com

Dated: June 20, 2013 Attorneys for Plaintiff General Electric Company

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 376 Filed 06/20/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 8658
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 20, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 

Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will serve the Notice of Appearance on all 

counsel of record.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Kimberly L. Scott

Carl H. von Ende (P21867)

Kimberly L. Scott (P69706)

101 N. Main St., 7th Floor

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1400

Telephone: (734) 668-7696

Facsimile: (734) 747-7147

vonende@millercanfield.com

scott@millercanfield.com

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 376 Filed 06/20/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 8659
2:09-mj-30142-DUTY Doc # 10 Filed 04/21/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 17
#### Ronjalo J. DIXON, Appellant v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50791.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 7, 1995.

*896Rosemary E. Percival, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. Lahue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and BERREY, J., and TURNAGE, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

Appeal from the denial of Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 11

                        ROTARY POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE


                                                       Three Months
                                                     Ended March 31,
                                                 1999               1998
                                                 ----               ----

BASIC
-----

Shares outstanding,
  beginning of period                             6,112,855          5,968,516

Weighted average number
  of shares issued, retired and
  and issuable share equivalents                        --                  --
                                                  ---------         ----------

Weighted average number
  of common and common
  equivalent shares
  outstanding                                     6,112,855          5,968,516
                                                  =========         ==========

Net loss                                         $ (305,520)       $  (312,651)
                                                  =========         ==========

Net loss per
  common share                                   $    (0.05)       $     (0.05)
                                                  =========         ==========

DILUTED
-------

Weighted average number
  of common and common
  equivalent shares
  outstanding as
  adjusted to full
  dilution                                        6,912,855          5,968,516
                                                  =========         ==========

Net loss                                         $ (305,520)       $  (312,651)
                                                  =========         ==========

Net loss per
  common share                                   $    (0.04)*      $     (0.05)*
                                                  =========         ============


------------------------
* These calculations are submitted in accordance with SEC requirements, although
  they are not in accordance with APB Opinion No. 15 because they are
  anti-dilutive.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No's. 333-05873, 033-76120, 333-05959,
033-76122, 333-05957, 333-18935, 333-18883, 333-18885, 333-30841, 333-30211, 333-31901,
333-31895, 333-43757, 333-60365, 333-91995, 333-84751, 333-40914, 333-48116, 333-60862,
333-116421 and 333-116423 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No's. 033-94532, 333-09109, 333-50775,
333-50777 and 333-53351 on Forms S-3 of our reports dated March 11, 2005, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Spherion Corporation, and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spherion Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2004.

DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP

Fort
Lauderdale, Florida
March 14, 2005

---



QuickLinks
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4041

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to convey

for use as a farm school.Palos, California, to the Dos Palos Ag Boostersa parcel of unused agricultural land in Dos
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4041

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a parcel

of unused agricultural land in Dos Palos, California,

to the Dos Palos Ag Boosters for use as a farm school.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4041 EH

1 SECTION. 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, UNUSED AGRICULTURAL

2 LAND, DOS PALOS, CALIFORNIA.

3 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding

4 any other provision of law, including section 335(c) of the

5 Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C.

6 1985(c)), the Secretary of Agriculture may convey to the

7 Dos Palos Ag Boosters of Dos Palos, California, all right,

8 title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel

9 of real property (including improvements thereon) held by

10 the Secretary that consists of approximately 22 acres and

11 is located at 18296 Elgin Avenue, Dos Palos, California,

12 to be used as a farm school for the education and training

13 of students and beginning farmers regarding farming. Any

14 such conveyance shall be final with no future liability ac15 cruing to the Secretary of Agriculture.

16 (b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the con17 veyance under subsection (a), the transferee shall pay to

18 the Secretary an amount equal to the fair market value

19 of the parcel conveyed under subsection (a).

20 (c) ALTERNATIVE TRANSFEREE.—At the request of

21 the Dos Palos Ag Boosters, the Secretary may make the

22 conveyance authorized by subsection (a) to the Dos Palos

23 School District.

24 (d) DETERMINATION OF FAIR MARKET VALUE AND

25 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.—The Secretary shall determine

26 the fair market value of the parcel to be conveyed under
3

•HR 4041 EH

1 subsection (a). The exact acreage and legal description of

2 the parcels shall be determined by a survey satisfactory

3 to the Secretary. The cost of any such survey shall be

4 borne by the transferee.

5 (e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

6 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi7 tions in connection with the conveyance under this section

8 as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter9 ests of the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EDWARD PRYOR,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-13185

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

WAYNE COUNTY, JEROME PANACKIA,

MAUREEN MCMILLAN, DWIGHT

FULLILOVE, LUCIOUS JACKSON,

ANTHONY MILO, MAURICE THOMAS,

and DARON WEATHERSPOON,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

SANCTIONS AND ORDERING DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR

MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

Presently before the Court is the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against the defendant

following the defendants’ unilateral termination of the court-ordered deposition of Greg Haddway

on June 14, 2011. The defendants have filed a response indicating that defense counsel terminated

the deposition in order to file a protective order. This is a permissible reason for terminating a

deposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3)(A)-(B) (allowing a party to move for a limitation on the

deposition and allowing the Court to “limit its scope and manner as provided in Rule 26(c)); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 26(c) (governing protective orders). Therefore, the Court will deny without prejudice the

plaintiff’s motion for sanctions. The Court also will order the defendants to file their motion for a

protective order by July 1, 2011, since nearly two weeks have elapsed since the date of the

deposition and the motion has not yet been filed before the Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for sanctions [dkt #72] is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2:09-cv-13185-DML-MJH Doc # 81 Filed 06/27/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1716
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendants must file an appropriate motion for a protective

order on or before July 1, 2011.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: June 27, 2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on June 27, 2011.

s/Deborah R. Tofil 

DEBORAH R. TOFIL

2:09-cv-13185-DML-MJH Doc # 81 Filed 06/27/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1717
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case No. 2:09-cv-10122 

Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

Mag. Virginia M. Morgan 

THEODORE CAMERON MCAVOY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

STERIS CORPORATION, 

Defendant. 

 

/

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

At a session of said Court 

held in the United States District Court 

Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division 

on: January 18, 2011. 

PRESENT: PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

 United States District Judge 

 Pursuant to the below-referenced stipulation of the Parties, and the Court being otherwise 

advised in the premises; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and 

WITHOUT COSTS to either party. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

2:09-cv-10122-PJD-VMM Doc # 37 Filed 01/18/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 395
2 

Dated: January 18, 2011 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on 

January 18, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

STIPULATION

Plaintiff Theodore Cameron McAvoy and Defendant STERIS Corporation, through their 

respective undersigned counsel, herein stipulate and agree that, a settlement having been reached 

in which neither party admits liability and which is entirely satisfactory to both parties, the 

foregoing Order dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against STERIS with prejudice and without costs 

may be entered by the Court. 

/s Matthew L. Turner (w/consent) s/Brian M. Ziff 

Matthew L. Turner (P48706) 

Turner & Turner PC 

26000 West 12 Mile Road 

Southfield, Michigan 48304 

(248) 355-1727 

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 

Michael S. Daoudi (P53261) 

Law Offices of Michael S. Daoudi, P.C. 

26711 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 200 

Southfield, Michigan 48033 

(248) 352-0800 

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff 

Date: January 17, 2011 

Daniel J. Scully, Jr. (P36530) 

Brian M. Ziff (P58124) 

Cynthia M. Filipovich (P53173) 

Clark Hill PLC 

500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 3500 

Detroit, Michigan 48226-3435 

(313) 965-8300 

Attorneys for Defendant STERIS Corporation 

Date: January 17, 2011 

2:09-cv-10122-PJD-VMM Doc # 37 Filed 01/18/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 396
MIE 310 Order of Reference to a Magistrate JudgeRev. 3/98)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Adil Shafi,

Counter-Plaintiff/Third Party Plaintiff

v.

Frederick Weidinger, et al,

Counter-Defendants/Third Party

Defendant,

and

Robotic Visions Technologies, LLC, et al

Plaintiffs,

vs

Adil Shafi,

Defendant.

/

Case Number: 09-10454

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts 

Magistrate Judge Laurie Michelson

Case No: 11-12909

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

Magistrate Judge Laurie Michelson

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to United States Magistrate Judge

Michael Hluchaniuk for the following purpose(s):

# Conduct Settlement Conference 2/16/12 at 10:00 am

DATED: 1/13/12 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that a copy of this order was served upon all counsel of record on the above date

by electronic filing.

/s/ Linda Vertriest

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 130 Filed 01/13/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 3153
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

__________________________________________________________________

No. DA 22-0378

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RALPH DEAVILA,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

without objection and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including September 14, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2023

08/16/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0378
2:09-mc-50995-AJT Doc # 3 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 67
2:09-mc-50995-AJT Doc # 3 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 68
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANN MARIE ROBERTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-12593

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on motions for summary judgment from both parties. 

For the reasons set forth in an opinion issued this date,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED the Defendant’s motion for

summary judgment is granted and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: July 19, 2010

copies to:

Kara L. Rosso, Esq.

William L. Woodard, AUSA
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John E. Farr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Pervasive Software Inc. on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Pervasive Software Inc.





By:

/s/    JOHN E. FARRJohn E. Farr Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     BALANCE  SHEET,  INCOME  STATEMENT  AND CASH  FLOW  STATEMENT  OF  ILLINOVA
     CORPORATION  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE BALANCE
     SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT OF ILLINOVA CORPORATION.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000914755
<NAME>                        ILLINOVA CORPORATION
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER>                   0
   <NAME>                     0
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                     Default
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   Per-Book
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      4475
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    247
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1016
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       1063
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6801
<COMMON>                                       1167
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          199
<PREFERRED>                                    57
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           2265
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             50
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 98
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  444
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    70
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               62
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 2389
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  6801
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      2431
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           (1056)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     4733
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     3677
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        (1246)
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             26
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 (1220)
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       163
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1383)
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       89
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      117
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (19.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (19.30)
        




</TABLE>