alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4290 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4290

  To amend title V of the Trade Act of 1974 to add to the eligibility 
  criteria for the Generalized System of Preferences full cooperation 
with the United States in preventing illegal drug traffic and the entry 
                of illegal drugs into the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1996

   Mr. Brown of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title V of the Trade Act of 1974 to add to the eligibility 
  criteria for the Generalized System of Preferences full cooperation 
with the United States in preventing illegal drug traffic and the entry 
                of illegal drugs into the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 502(b)(2) 
of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following:
                    ``(H) Such country fails to cooperate fully with 
                the United States in preventing illegal drug traffic 
                and the entry of illegal drugs into the United 
                States.''; and
            (2) in the last sentence by striking ``and (G)'' and 
        inserting ``(G), and (H)''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21

 CAI WIRELESS SYSTEMS, INC.

  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE
           REGISTRANT
     SUBSIDIARIES OF THE
         REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      SUBSIDIARY                                 NAME UNDER WHICH SUBSIDIARY              STATE OF
                                                     CONDUCTS BUSINESS                 INCORPORATION

<S>                                               <C>                                         <C>
Greater Albany Wireless Systems, Inc.              Capital Choice Television            New York
Rochester Choice Television, Inc.                                                       Delaware
Hampton Roads Wireless, Inc.                                                            Delaware
Eastern New England TV, Inc.                                                            Delaware
Connecticut Choice Television, Inc.                                                     Connecticut
Commonwealth Choice Television, Inc.                                                    Delaware
Atlantic Microsystems, Inc.                                                             Delaware
Housatonic Wireless, Inc.                                                               New York
New York Choice Television, Inc.                   Wireless Cable of New York           New York
Niskayuna Associates, Inc.                                                              Delaware
Onteo Associates, Inc.                                                                  New York
Washington Choice Television, Inc.                 Atlantic Wireless                    Delaware
CAI CT Holdings Corp.                                                                   Delaware
CAI Developments, Inc.                                                                  Delaware
CAI/AMI Spectrum Management, Inc.                                                       Delaware
Philadelphia Choice Television, Inc.               Popvision                            Delaware
ACS License, Inc.                                                                       Pennsylvania
Onondaga Wireless, Inc.                                                                 New York
Chenango Associates, Inc.                                                               New York
AMI Boston, Inc.                                                                        Delaware
CAI Data Systems, Inc.                                                                  Delaware
CAI Wireless Internet, Inc.                                                             Delaware
Springfield License, Inc.                                                               Delaware
Springfield Choice Television, Inc.                                                     Delaware
</TABLE>

_______________
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kwan JOHNSON, Defendant/Appellant. Kwan JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 63365, 66782.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 7, 1995.

Alfred A. Speer, Clayton, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL, and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals a judgment entered upon convictions by a jury for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action and the denial of post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONMN L A E

# D PR 20-0005

IN RE THE MOTION OF NICHOLAS J. MONTAGUE FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

### MAY 26 2020
Bowen Greenwood ":lerk of Supreme Court Stote nf Montana ORDER

Nicholas J. Montague has filed a motion for admission to the Bar ofthe State of Montana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission,Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Montague has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator,Nicholas J.Montague may be sworn in to the practice oflaw in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this e-.6. day ofMay,2020.
ChiefJustice 05/26/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005

# ,

4 . JJ, . i
**Exhibit 7**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR**

We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report onForm 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited of our report dated March 9, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting whichappears in this Annual Report. 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 ofFairfax Financial Holdings Limited (File Nos. 333-165730, 333-168835 and 333-170873) of our report referred to above. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Interests of Experts” in the Annual Information Form filed asExhibit 1 attached to this Annual Report on Form 40-F which is incorporated by reference in such Registration Statements. 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chartered Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants 

Toronto, Ontario 

March 9, 2012
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WESLEY WAYNE AUSTIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

LAWRENCE G. WASDEN; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-35048 

D.C. No. 4:16-cv-00172-BLW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18, 2017**

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Wesley Wayne Austin appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal claims 

arising from his state court conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 

1291. We review de novo. Whitaker v. Garcetti, 486 F.3d 572, 579 (9th

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-35048 

Cir. 2007) (dismissal under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)); Resnick v. 

Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A) . 

We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Austin’s action as Heck-barred because 

success on the claims would necessarily imply the invalidity of his sentence, and 

Austin failed to show that his sentence has been invalidated. See Heck, 512 U.S. at 

486-87 (explaining that if “a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily 

imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence . . . the complaint must be 

dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has 

already been invalidated”).

AFFIRMED.
#### TEMPLEMAN v. TEMPLEMAN BROS., Inc.

No. 14998.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

April 29, 1935.

See, also (La. App.) 156 So. 824.

Maurice B. Gatlin, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Prowell & McBride, of New Orleans, for appellee.

JANVIER, Judge.

This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal because of our alleged lack of jurisdiction. The suit is one for the return of money loaned. The amount claimed in the petition is $3,000.06.

There was judgment below for plaintiff for $504.98. Defendant appealed to this court, and plaintiff-appellee moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the amount in dispute, $3,000.06, is in excess of our maximum jurisdictional limit. Appellant, in answer to the motion to dismiss, makes the following statement:

“While the original suit in this matter was for the sum of $3,000.06 the trial judge expressly ruled that plaintiff and appellee failed to prove his cause of action and that defendant was not liable for that amount, but in the course of the trial it was disclosed that there was a fund of $500.00 due by defendant and appellant to plaintiff and appellee, (the correctness of which findings defendant-appellant denies) and it is the ruling of the Honorable Trial Judge giving judgment in favor of plaintiff and appellee in the sum of $500.00 in an entirely different matter that defendant and appellant complains of and consequently defendant and appellant is in this Court purely and simply in connection with the claim of $500.00 for which the trial judge gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff and which was not asked for nor mentioned in the suit which the plaintiff filed herein.”

*49But appellant overlooks the fact that when the matter was submitted below the sum in dispute was the amount originally claimed, to wit, $3,000.06, and, so far as the record shows, this is still the amount in dispute. We find no remittitur, or stipulation reducing the claim of $504.98 and, within the legal delays, appellee might by answer to the appeal, request that the judgment be increased to the amount originally prayed for. O. P. art. 890.

The amount originally prayed for is in excess of our maximum jurisdictional limit. Const. 1921, art 7, §§ 10, 29.

Exercising the discretion vested in us by Act No. 19 of 1912, we will transfer the matter to the Supreme Court.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this appeal be, and it is transferred to the Supreme Court of Louisiana to be disposed of according to law; the transfer to be made within sixty days after this judgment becomes final, and, if not so made, then the appeal to be deemed dismissed; defendant-appellant to pay the costs of appeal in this court and the remaining costs to await final determination of the matter.

Appeal transferred to Supreme Court.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of World Series of Golf, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Patrick BrownPatrick BrownChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to World Series of Golf, Inc. and will be retained by World Series of Golf, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 2
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 3
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 4
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 5
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 6
2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 7
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 of Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware (the “Company”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

March 31, 2008

 

/s/ JOSEPH V. TARANTO

Joseph V. Taranto

Chairman and Chief

Executive Officer

 

/s/ CRAIG EISENACHER

Craig Eisenacher

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3844

For the relief of the estate of William R. Holden and the estate of John

Davis.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 1996

Mr. ROSE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the estate of William R. Holden and the

estate of John Davis.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT AUTHORIZED.

4 As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment

5 of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall pay—

6 (1) to the estate of William R. Holden, social

7 security account number 267–02–9232, a lump sum

8 of $1,000,000; and
2

•HR 3844 IH

1 (2) to the estate of John Davis, social security

2 account number 467–21–1729, a lump sum of

3 $1,000,000.

4 SEC. 2. FULL SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

5 (a) The payment authorized by paragraph (1) of sec6 tion 1 shall be in full satisfaction of all claims in connec7 tion with the incident which resulted in the death of Wil8 liam R. Holden and John Davis against the United States

9 of each of the following:

10 (1) The estate of William R. Holden.

11 (2) Judy Holden, widow of William R. Holden.

12 (3) The heirs and assigns of William R.

13 Holden.

14 (4) The heirs and assigns of Judy Holden.

15 (b) The payment authorized by paragraph (2) of sec16 tion 1 shall be in full satisfaction of all claims in connec17 tion with the incident which resulted in the death of Wil18 liam R. Holden and John Davis against the United States

19 of each of the following:

20 (1) The estate of John Davis.

21 (2) Teresa Davis, widow of John Davis.

22 (3) The heirs and assigns of John Davis.

23 (4) The heirs and assigns of Teresa Davis.
3

•HR 3844 IH

1 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON FEES.

2 Not more than a total of 10 percent of the payment

3 authorized by paragraph (1) of section 1 and not more

4 than a total of 10 percent of the payment authorized by

5 paragraph (2) of section 1 shall be paid to or received by

6 agents or attorneys for services rendered in connection

7 with obtaining such payment, any contract to the contrary

8 notwithstanding. Any person who violates this section

9 shall be fined not more than $1,000.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13150-000]


FFP Ohio River 2, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

August 5, 2008.
    On March 25, 2008, FFP Ohio River 2, LLC each filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Ohio River 10 and Ohio River 2 Projects, to be 
located on the Ohio River in Massac County, Illinois and McCracken 
County, Kentucky.
    The proposed Ohio River 2 Project consists of: (1) 2,460 proposed 
20 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total installed 
capacity of 49.2 megawatts, (2) a proposed transmission line, and (3) 
appurtenant facilities. The FFP Ohio River 2, LLC, project would have 
an average annual generation of 215.50 gigawatt-hours and be sold to a 
local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Dan Irvin, FFP Ohio River 2, LLC, 69 Bridge 
Street, Manchester, MA 01944, phone (978) 232-3536.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13150) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18465 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I, Carl
Oberg, President and Chief Executive Officer of Classic Costume Company,
Inc.,  (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1)    the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:
August 18, 2008




/s/
      Carl Oberg
              Carl
      ObergPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### Miguel E. Nassar, Respondent, v. Salim Elias, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEADWAY CORPORATE RESOURCES, INC., FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                       371
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,810
<PP&E>                                           2,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,360
<BONDS>                                         19,377
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              400
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,336
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,842
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   137
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,869
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (2,999)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
        

</TABLE>