alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than September 2, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Burl Thornton, Assistant Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Community Financial Partners, Inc., Joliet, Illinois, to 
acquire at least 57.8 percent of the voting shares of First Community 
Bank of Plainfield (in organization), Plainfield, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 4, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc.E8-18187 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-30722

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LOUELLA GIVENS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:16-CR-110-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SOUTHWICK, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louella Givens, federal prisoner # 34318-034, appeals the district court’s 

order denying her request that her time spent on postsentencing house arrest 

be credited against the 18-month prison term imposed for her conviction of 

health care fraud. Before the court is Givens’s motion for the appointment of 

counsel. In the interests of judicial economy, we dismiss the appeal as 

frivolous, as discussed below. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2; United States v. GarciaGutierrez, 835 F.2d 585, 586 (5th Cir. 1988).

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 5, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-30722 Document: 00515224646 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/05/2019
No. 19-30722

2

The district court had the authority to restrict Givens to house arrest 

during her postsentencing release on bond pending her surrender to the 

Bureau of Prisons. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a); Reno v. 

Koray, 515 U.S. 50, 57 (1995). Because her house arrest occurred during her 

release on bond before her surrender to the Bureau of Prisons, her time on 

house arrest was not “official detention” under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) and thus 

was not eligible to be credited against her 18-month prison sentence. See

Koray, 515 U.S. at 56-65.

Givens’s appeal is frivolous and entirely without merit. Accordingly, we 

DISPENSE with further briefing and DISMISS the appeal. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2. Givens’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

 Case: 19-30722 Document: 00515224646 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/05/2019
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements No. 33-90926 and 333-75706 on Form S-8, No. 333-38338 on Form S-3, and No. 333-159256 on Form S-1/A of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. of our report dated March 27, 2009, with respect to thebalance sheets of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

Our report with respect to thefinancial statements refers to the adoption by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB StatementNo. 109*, effective January 1, 2007. 

**/s/ KPMG LLP**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

___________________________________________ 

JOHN ADAMS, 

Plaintiff, 

Case Number: 09-CV-12152 

v. 

Hon.: Victoria A. Roberts 

AUTO RAIL LOGISTICS, INC., 

a foreign corporation doing business in Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub 

Michigan, AUTO WAREHOUSING 

COMPANY, a foreign corporation doing 

Business in Michigan, and JOHN CORRIGAN, 

individually, 

Defendants. 

________________________________________/ 

 

COURTNEY E. MORGAN, JR. (P29137) 

BRIAN J. NAGY (P65542) 

Morgan & Meyers, PLC 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

3200 Greenfield, Suite 260 

Dearborn, Michigan 48120 

(313) 961-0130 

(313) 961-8178 (fax) 

cmorgan@morganmeyers.com

bnagy@morganmeyers.com

THOMAS R. WURST (P30177) 

SARAH K. WILLEY (P57376) 

Miller Johnson 

Attorneys for Defendants 

303 North Rose Street, Suite 600 

Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007 

(269) 226-2957 

(269) 978-2957 (fax) 

willeys@millerjohnson.com

wurstt@millerjohnson.com

 

JUDGMENT

At a session of said Court held at the United States District Court, 

Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, in the City of 

Detroit, County of Wayne, and State of Michigan, this 8th day of 

February, 2011. 

PRESENT: HON. VICTORIA A. ROBERTS 

2:09-cv-12152-VAR-MKM Doc # 45 Filed 02/08/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1126
This matter was tried before a jury on January 25, 26, 27, 28 and 31, 2011. The 

jury rendered a verdict of no cause of action on January 31, 2011. Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that, in accordance with the jury’s verdict, JUDGMENT is 

entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. 

This Judgment resolves the claim with prejudice and closes the case. 

 S/Victoria A. Roberts

Hon. Victoria A. Roberts 

U.S. District Court Judge 

KZ_DOCS 255324v1 27454.001 

2:09-cv-12152-VAR-MKM Doc # 45 Filed 02/08/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1127
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4101

To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is

operating to provide rescue diver training under the Coast Guard helicopter rescue swimming training program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1996

Mr. STUDDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the department in which the

Coast Guard is operating to provide rescue diver training

under the Coast Guard helicopter rescue swimming training program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rescue Diver Training

5 Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 4101 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESCUE DIVER TRAINING FOR SELECTED COAST

2 GUARD PERSONNEL.

3 The Secretary of the department in which the Coast

4 Guard is operating shall provide rescue diver training to

5 selected Coast Guard personnel, under the helicopter res6 cue swimming program conducted under section 9 of the

7 Coast Guard Authorization Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 2862;

8 14 U.S.C. 88 note).

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18067]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 9, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 16, 2008, (73 FR 20718), Research Triangle Institute, 
Kenneth H. Davis Jr., Hermann Building, East Institute Drive, P.O. Box 
12194, Research Triangle, North Carolina 27709, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)...........................  I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Institute will manufacture small quantities of cocaine and 
marihuana derivatives for use by their customers in analytical kits, 
reagents, and reference standards as directed by the National Institute 
on Drug Abuse.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Research Triangle Institute to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Research Triangle Institute to ensure that 
the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with State and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: July 30, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-18067 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>    5

<PERIOD-TYPE>   YEAR

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1996

<PERIOD-END> DEC-31-1996

                                  <C>

<CASH>                             $  163,583

<SECURITIES>                          102,173

<RECEIVABLES>                         177,252

<ALLOWANCES>                           32,000

<INVENTORY>                            40,707

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      463,236

<PP&E>                                238,698

<DEPRECIATION>                        129,023

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,199,336

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               1,307,890

<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0 
<COMMON>                                3,812

<OTHER-SE>                           (112,336)

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        1,199,336 

<SALES>                             1,600,785

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1,600,785

<CGS>                                 586,899

<TOTAL-COSTS>                         586,899

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    1,518,731

<LOSS-PROVISION>                       20,000

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    178,990

<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (524,845)

<INCOME-TAX>                                0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (524,845)

<DISCONTINUED>                              0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0

<CHANGES>                                   0

<NET-INCOME>                         (524,845)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                         $(0.16)

<EPS-DILUTED>                              0   



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Leonard JACKSON, Defendant/Appellant. Leonard JACKSON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65947, 67694.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 13, 1996.

*869Raymond J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of fraudulent use of a credit device, § 570.130, RSMo 1986. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to a prison term of ten years. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

Defendant has failed to address any points in this appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. That appeal is therefore considered abandoned. *See State v. Nelson,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). We have reviewed defendant’s claim of error on direct appeal and find it to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM HELMER,

Plaintiff,

v.

BRIAN GUEST, KATHLEEN SOLOMON,

OSCODA COUNTY, KEVIN GRACE,

DAVE STENZEL, ED POKRZYWNICKI,

and RONALD NIGHTINGALE,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-11697

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District 

of Michigan, on December 21, 2011.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On May 4, 2009, William Helmer (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner currently incarcerated

at the Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility in Ionia, Michigan, filed this pro se civil rights

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Defendant Ronald Nightingale’s

motion to dismiss or for summary judgment, filed on March 23, 2011 pursuant to Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 56. The Court has referred this matter to Magistrate

Judge Mona K. Majzoub for all pretrial proceedings.

On October 20, 2011, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) in which she recommends that this Court grant Nightingale’s

2:09-cv-11697-PJD-MKM Doc # 148 Filed 12/21/11 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 1473
2

motion pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Magistrate Judge Majzoub

concludes that Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to support his claims that

Nightingale violated his due process and equal protection rights. As for Plaintiff’s

retaliation claim, Magistrate Judge Majzoub concludes that Plaintiff has failed to allege

facts supporting a finding of retaliatory motive. Magistrate Judge Majzoub recommends

dismissal of Plaintiff’s malicious prosecution claim because Plaintiff has not alleged that a

criminal prosecution was brought against him. 

At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Majzoub advises the parties that

they may object and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. 

Id. She further advises the parties that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a

waiver of any further right of appeal.” Id. (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct.

466 (1985); Howard v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991);

United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981)). No objections to the R&R have

been filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached

by Magistrate Judge Majzoub. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Ronald Nightingale’s motion to dismiss is granted

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

D. Randall Gilmer, Esq.

G. Gus Morris, Esq.

2:09-cv-11697-PJD-MKM Doc # 148 Filed 12/21/11 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 1474
3

Mark E. Donnelly, A.A.G.

Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub

William Helmer, #140677

Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility

1727 West Bluewater Highway

Ionia, MI 48846

2:09-cv-11697-PJD-MKM Doc # 148 Filed 12/21/11 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 1475
174 La. 140

#### CLARK v. KOCH et al.

No. 30962.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 4, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 29, 1932.

Spencer, Gidiere, Phelps & Dunbar, and W. B. Spencer, Jr., all of New Orleans, for appellant.

Borron, Hebert & Owen, of Baton Rouge, for appellees Bank of White Castle in Liquidation and Hibernia Bank & Trust Co.

OVERTON, J.

This case comes before us on appeal from a judgment, sustaining exceptions of no right or cause of action, filed by the Bank of White Castle and the Hibernia Bank & Trust Company, two of the defendants in the case, and, as a consequence, dismissing plaintiff’s demand.

The suit was instituted, as appears from the petition, to annul two orders of executory process, one issued in the suit entitled “Bank of White Castle v. Pierre C. Lorio,” and the other in the suit entitled “Hibernia Bank and Trust Company v. Camille J. Koch,’’ under which the property mortgaged, consisting of' a plantation, was twice sold as the property of two different owners, one ownership following and depending on the other, and to restore the property sold, to the succession of Pierre C. Lorio, Lorio having executed, as owner of the plantation, the first mortgage foreclosed, the foreclosure occurring shortly after his death.

Plaintiff bases his right to restore the property to the succession on the ground that he is a judgment creditor of the succession for some $7,400, but he does not allege that the succession is insolvent. If the succession is solvent, or, in other words, if there is enough property belonging to it, without restoring the property sold, to satisfy plaintiff’s judgment, then plaintiff has no right whatever to bring this suit, for he discloses no interest in doing so. One instituting a suit must disclose in his petition his right to do so, otherwise he fails to show; a right or cause of action. The court cannot assume that the succession is insolvent. The burden of pleading is upon plaintiff to disclose that fact, if it exists.

Plaintiff having failed to allege his right to maintain this suit, it would be needless, if not inadvisable, to inquire into the alleged nullities in the two sales, since, for aught that appears, it may never become necessary to inquire into them. The right to inquire into them, due to plaintiff’s failure to disclose a right in himself, is absent.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,648]


 Hanesbrands Inc., Oak Summit Division, Winston-Salem, NC; Notice 
of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on July 8, 2008 in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Hanesbrands Inc., Oak Summit 
Division, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
    The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active 
certification, (TA-W-61,962A) which expires on September 13, 2009. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of July 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-17888 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### David J. HOWARD, Respondent, v. MISSOURI-NEBRASKA EXPRESS, INC., Appellant, and Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. WD 52280.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Robert E. Douglass, St. Joseph, for appellant.

Jerrold Renter, Kansas City, for Respondent Howard.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Brian Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for Second Injury Fund.

Before HANNA, P.J., and SMART and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Missouri-Nebraska Express, Inc. appeals an award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of David J. Howard. The Appellant contends that the Commission erred in finding that Howard complied with Section 287.420, RSMo 1986, although he did not notify his employer of his injury within 30 days of the injury, which occurred in May, 1990.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Greater Asia Realty Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tay Chong Weng, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Tay Chong Weng
---------------------------------
By: Tay Chong Weng
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director

Dated: May 7, 2008




                                      17