alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1818022.01 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RIVIERA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 

an Illinois corporation, Case No. 09-cv-11380-PJD-VMM 

 Plaintiff, District Judge Patrick J. Duggan 

v. Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan 

RDI OF MICHIGAN, LLC, 

a Michigan limited liability company, 

 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Peter M. Falkenstein (P61375) Robert D. Horvath (P27633) 

Mark G. Cooper (P52657) 2833 Crooks Rd., Suite 104 

David S. McDaniel (P56994) Troy, MI 48084 

Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, PC (248) 614-4770 

201 S. Main St., Suite 300 rdhjdlo@aol.com 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 489104 

(734) 222-4776 Attorney for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

pfalkenstein@jaffelaw.com 

mcooper@jaffelaw.com 

dmcdaniel@jaffelaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER 

ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY ROBERT D. HORVATH

FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE 

TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (D/E 33) 

FOR EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY

 This matter came before the Court on Robert D. Horvath’s motion to withdraw as counsel 

for Defendant RDI of Michigan (D/E 42) for which a hearing was held on October 27, 2009, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

2:09-cv-11380-PJD-RSW Doc # 45 Filed 10/28/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 423
1818022.01 

1. The motion of Robert D. Horvath is granted and his appearance as counsel for 

Defendant RDI of Michigan is terminated. 

2. Defendant RDI of Michigan has 30 days in which to obtain new counsel. 

3. Defendant RDI of Michigan may have additional time to file its response to 

Plaintiff’s pending motion for summary judgment (D/E 33) and that response is now due no later 

than November 30, 2009. 

4. Discovery is extended to January 31, 2010. However, if Howard Hertz (P26653) 

enters an appearance as counsel for Defendant RDI of Michigan, discovery is then extended to 

February 28, 2010. 

5. The time period for Stephen F. Wasinger, PLC and Anthony L. DeLuca, PLC to 

respond to Riviera Distributors, Inc.’s subpoenas to them is extended to November 30, 2009. 

IT IS SO ORDERED 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: October 28, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on 

October 28, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

Approved for entry: Approved for entry: 

________________________________ _________________________________ 

s/ with consent Mark G. Cooper (P52657) s/Robert D. Horvath (P27633) 

Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, PC 2833 Crooks Rd., Suite 104 

27777 Franklin Road, Ste, 2500 Troy, MI 48084 

Southfield, MI 48034 (248) 614-4770 

(248) 351-3000 rdhjdlo@aol.com 

 

Attorney for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff

Attorney for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant 

2:09-cv-11380-PJD-RSW Doc # 45 Filed 10/28/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 424
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 232 V

UNPUBLISHED

VERA LEFTRIDGE

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: March 16, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY , for petitioner.

Zoe Wade , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On February 11, 2019

, Vera Leftridge filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a sho ulder injury related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine administered on

December 2, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 10, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, R espondent concludes that “ petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012 ).2

with SIRVA of the right arm and tha t it meets the requirements of a Table injury claim for

SIRVA stemming from the flu vaccination on December 2, 2017

. ” Id. at 4 . Respondent

further “ did not identify any other causes for petitioner’s injury, and records show that

she suffered the sequela of thi s injury for more than six months

. ” Id. at 4

- 5.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

MICKY A. GUTIER, 

Appellant, 

v.

HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH 

& CO. KG, 

Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2013-1481 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Cancellation Nos. 92052549 and 92052550. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Micky A. Gutier moves for a 45-day extension of time 

to file the “Informal Brief of Appellant”. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 13-1481 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 07/16/2013
GUTIER v. HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MGMT 2

The motion for an extension of time is granted. 

Gutier’s opening brief (form enclosed) is due within 45 

days of the date of filing of this order. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk

s21 

Case: 13-1481 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 07/16/2013
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

April 3, 2018

a0326 

# Order

Clerk April 3, 2018

155841 & (17)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 5841 COA: 336177 Oakland CC: 11-235798-FC MARK WAYNE ARNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue is GRANTED. Th e application for leave to appeal the May 12, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

W ILDER , J., did not participate becaus e he was on the Court of Appeal s panel.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                                RANGO ENERGY INC.
             FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harp Sangha, am the Chief Executive Officer of Rango Energy Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six month period ended
June 30, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly
Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 20, 2012                   By: /s/ Harp Sangha
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Harp Sangha
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ELIJAH MIDGETT, 

 

 Petitioner, Civil Action No. 

 09-CV-13654 

vs. 

 HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

MITCH PERRY, 

 

 Respondent. 

_____________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) 

of Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives, entered on January 4, 2012. The Magistrate Judge 

reviewed the merits of Plaintiff’s habeas petition and recommended that it be denied. 

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R and the time to do so has expired. Thus, 

Plaintiff has waived any further right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). 

In any event, the Court has reviewed the thorough R&R and finds the Magistrate Judge’s 

analysis and result to be correct. 

Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Dkt. 15) is accepted and adopted as the 

findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s habeas petition is denied. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 30, 2012 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

 Flint, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

 United States District Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of 

record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or 

First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on May 30, 2012. 

 s/Deborah J. Goltz 

 DEBORAH J. GOLTZ 

 Case Manager 

4:09-cv-13654-MAG-PJK Doc # 18 Filed 05/30/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 948
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MAURICE JENKINS,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-12451

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and

the pleadings, including Plaintiff’s Objections if any, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND

ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

It is further ordered that Defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative for

summary judgment is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: January 21, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on January 21, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12451-NGE-MKM Doc # 22 Filed 01/21/10 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 214
Exhibit 10.25

LOGO

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 2002

EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2002

|NAME:          |  | JIM LAMBERT                   |  | 
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | 
|TITLE:         |  | PRESIDENT/CEO                 |  | 
|BASE SALARY:   |  | $350,000                      |  | 
|ON-PLAN BONUS: |  | 55% of Base Salary ($192,500) |  | 
|              

EXHIBIT C

By
signing this Executive Compensation Plan 2002 ("Plan"), you hereby agree that the terms of this Plan shall be in addition to the terms of the Employment Agreement between you and Dot Hill dated
August 2, 1999 ("Employment Agreement"), and shall replace and supercede the terms of Exhibit C of the Employment Agreement with respect to your base salary and bonus for the year 2002.
Otherwise, the terms of your Employment Agreement remain unchanged. For any period of time after December 31, 2002, your base salary and bonus shall be subject to change, as determined by Dot
Hill's Board of Directors and/or Compensation Committee ("BOD").

BONUS

Bonus
is calculated based on a percentage of base salary.

Bonus
will be paid once annually as soon as practicable after an audit of the Company's fiscal year 2002 results has been completed and after the Dot Hill Board of Directors and/or Compensation
Committee ("BOD") has approved the payment.

75%
of bonus potential is tied to Dot Hill's overall 2002 annual operating plan.



25%
of bonus potential is subjective and may be tied to individual departmental goals and performance.

TERMS

|/s/PRESTON ROMMPreston Romm, CFO |  | /s/JIM LAMBERTJim Lambert, President/CEO
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on September 18-19, 2008, in Room 630, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. On September 18, the session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. On September 19, the session will begin at 8 a.m. and end at 12 noon. This meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the capability of VA health care facilities and programs to meet the medical, psychological, and social needs of older veterans and evaluates VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.

The meeting will feature presentations and discussion on VA's aging research activities, update on VA's geriatric workforce (to include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Geriatric Primary Care, VHA strategic planning activities in geriatrics and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and long term care needs of recently returning veterans, program advances in Community Living Centers and palliative care, and policy guidance and performance oversight of the VA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.

No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee not less than ten days in advance of the meeting to Mrs. Marcia Holt-Delaney, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care (114), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. Holt-Delaney, Program Analyst, at (202) 461-6769.

Dated: July 30, 2008.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-17898 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TOMMY HALL,

Plaintiff, Case Number 09-10933

Honorable David M. Lawson

v. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon

RAJA, JANY SHARPLEY, RAWAL,

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.,

and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 

DEFENDANT’S’ MOTION TO DISMISS

Presently before the Court is the report issued on August 4, 2011 by Magistrate Judge Mark

A. Randon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that this Court grant in part and deny in

part defendant Prison Health Services, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. Although the Magistrate Judge’s

report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the

recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far.

The parties’ failure to file objections to the Report and Recommendation waives any further right

to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987).

Likewise, the failure to object to the Magistrate Judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to

independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court

agrees with the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [dkt.

#103] is ADOPTED.

2:09-cv-10933-DML-MAR Doc # 105 Filed 09/07/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1082
-2-

It is further ORDERED that defendant Prison Health Services, Inc.’s motion to dismiss [dkt.

# 78] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief is DISMISSED. The

motion is denied in all other respects.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: September 7, 2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on September 7, 2011.

s/Deborah R. Tofil 

DEBORAH R. TOFIL

2:09-cv-10933-DML-MAR Doc # 105 Filed 09/07/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1083
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CRIMINAL NO. 09-mj-30127 

v.

DANNY RUSSELL BURBY

a/k/a THUMBS, 

Defendant.

__________________________________/

MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 18 U.S.C. §

3161(d) by leave of Court endorsed hereon the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of

Michigan hereby moves for dismissal without prejudice the complaint against DANNY

RUSSELL BURBY, herein, 

The reasons for dismissal without prejudice are as follows:

1. That the Government requires additional time to develop and acquire sufficient

evidence.

2. That the Government requires additional time to investigate the extent of the

criminal act alleged and the participants in it.

3. That proceeding to indictment or information within the time limits of § 3161(b)

as extended by § 3161(h) would substantially impair the Government's ability to

accomplish the objectives of paragraphs 1-2 above. See United States v. Lovasco,

431 U.S. 738, 792-796 (1977).

 TERRENCE BERG

 United States Attorney

 s/ Saima Mohsin 

s/Matthew J. Schneider

 Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 226-9163

Email: Saima.Mohsin@usdoj.gov

Dated: April 16, 2009 

2:09-mj-30127-DUTY Doc # 9 Filed 04/20/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 16
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Paulson, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 4, 2009




/s/ Thomas J. PaulsonThomas J. PaulsonChief Financial Officer
MIE 100 Order Regarding Reassignment of Companion Case (Rev. 3/98)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RAY M. HARRISON,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

CO-OP SERVICES CREDIT UNION,

Defendant(s).

/

CASE NUMBER: 09-12683

HONORABLE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. HLUCHANIUK

ORDER REGARDING REASSIGNMENT OF COMPANION CASE

This case appears to be a companion case to 09-12666. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.11, the Clerk

is directed to reassign this case to the docket of the HONORABLE JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA AND

DONALD A. SCHEER.

s/Marianne O. Battani

MARIANNE O. BATTANI 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to this order, case assignment credit will be given to the appropriate Judicial Officers.

Please indicate the appropriate case type: [CIVIL].

If the District Judge assigned to the companion case is located at another place of holding

court, the new case number is .

Date: September 3, 2009 S/ S Schoenherr

Deputy Clerk

cc: Counsel of Record

Receiving Judge

Case 5:09-cv-12683-JCO-DAS Document 7 Filed 09/03/2009 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04

- 20

- 00209

- CR, 04

- 20

- 00210

- CR, 04

- 20

- 00211

- CR
Alfred Alan GOODEMOTE , Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 452nd District Court , Menard County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2019

- 02512, 2019

- 02513, 2020

- 02515 Honorable Robert Hoffman , Judge Presiding
BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ , JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgments of the trial court are AFFIRMED.
SIGNED June 30 , 2021.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128453 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128453 COA: 252733 Wayne CC: 03-008071-01 CARL DONNELL LONG, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presen ted should be reviewed by this Court.

l 0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk