alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4330

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, relating to metropolitan

planning.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, relating

to metropolitan planning.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING

4 ORGANIZATIONS UNDER HIGHWAY PRO5 GRAM.

6 (a) PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION REPRESENTED.—

7 Section 134(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended

8 in each of paragraphs (1), (4), and (5) by striking ‘‘75

9 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.
2

•HR 4330 IH

1 (b) VETO POWER.—Section 134(b) of such title is

2 amended in each of paragraphs (1), (5)(A), and (5)(B)

3 by striking the parenthetical phrase.

4 (c) AUTONOMY.—Section 134(e) of such title is

5 amended by striking ‘‘and the State’’ and all that follows

6 through the period at the end and inserting the following:

7 ‘‘to ensure that the plans and programs required by this

8 section are complied with. It is the responsibility of the

9 State to provide oversight in the area with multiple metro10 politan planning organizations.’’.

11 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGA12 NIZATIONS UNDER TRANSIT PROGRAM.

13 (a) PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION REPRESENTED.—

14 Section 5303(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amend15 ed in each of paragraphs (1)(A), (4)(B)(i), and (5)(A) by

16 striking ‘‘75 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.

17 (b) VETO POWER.—Section 5303(c) of such title is

18 amended in each of paragraphs (1)(A), (5)(A), and (5)(B)

19 by striking the parenthetical phrase.

20 (c) AUTONOMY.—Section 5303(e)(3) of such title is

21 amended by striking ‘‘and the State’’ and all that follows

22 through the period at the end and inserting the following:

23 ‘‘to ensure that the plans and programs required by this

24 section are complied with. It is the responsibility of the
3

•HR 4330 IH

1 State to provide oversight in the area with multiple metro2 politan planning organizations.’’.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,058-01

EX PARTE LASHA EILEEN SPACEK, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-19-1300-D-WHC IN THE 428TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HAYS COUNTY

Per curiam. KELLER, P.J. filed a dissenting opinion, joined by YEARY, KEEL, and

SLAUGHTER, JJ.

O P I N I O N

Applicant pleaded guilty to theft and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in a state jail.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that her plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed to inform her

that this sentence could be stacked on one she was already serving. The affidavit from trial counsel

states that he affirmatively misadvised Applicant that any sentence from a jury would run

concurrently, which caused the defense to reject a plea offer from the State. 

Relief is granted. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781
2

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The judgment in cause number CR-19-1300-D in the 428th District Court

of Hayes County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Hayes

County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary

bench warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to theTexasDepartment ofCriminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: OCTOBER 18, 2023

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 451 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 451

To amend the independent counsel provisions of title 28, United States 
 Code, to authorize the appointment of an independent counsel when the 
 Attorney General determines that Department of Justice attorneys have 
                      engaged in certain conduct.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 1995

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the independent counsel provisions of title 28, United States 
 Code, to authorize the appointment of an independent counsel when the 
 Attorney General determines that Department of Justice attorneys have 
                      engaged in certain conduct.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.

    Section 592(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period 
at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; or'', and by adding 
after subparagraph (B) the following:
            ``(C) the Attorney General, upon completion of a 
        preliminary examination under this chapter, determines that 
        there are reasonable grounds to believe that--
                    ``(i) attorneys of the Department of Justice have 
                engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, corruption, or 
                fraud, and
                    ``(ii) further investigation is warranted.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4282 Considered and Passed House (CPH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4282

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 to 
make a technical correction relating to the provision of Department of 
           Defense assistance to local educational agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1996

 Mr. Bateman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities, and in addition to 
  the Committee on National Security, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                           September 28, 1996

 The Committees on Economic and Educational Opportunities and National 
               Security discharged; considered and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 to 
make a technical correction relating to the provision of Department of 
           Defense assistance to local educational agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
              ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.

    Section 386(c)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102-484; 20 U.S.C. 7703 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``section 8003(a)'' and inserting ``section 
        8003(a)(1)''; and
            (2) by striking ``(20 U.S.C. 7703(a))'' and inserting ``(20 
        U.S.C. 7703(a)(1))''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      31.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Denise
      Deng, certify that:





1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Largo Vista Group, Ltd.;





2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in
      Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
      reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
      small business issuer and have:





a)
      designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
      designed
      such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
      over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
      reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
      preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
      generally accepted accounting principles;





c)
      evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and





d)
      disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
      of
      an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
      reporting; and


Date:
      April 13, 2007





/s/Denise
      Deng


Denise
      Deng, Chief Financial Officer
KALU Exhibit 10.8 - 3.31.2014 - 10-Q






Exhibit 10.8


2014 STI Umbrella Plan
2014 Performance Goal and Bonus Pool            
The performance goal for the STI Performance Period shall be $5.0 million in Net cash provided by operating activities, as reported in the Company’s Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (“Cash Flow”).  The bonus pool, representing the amount available for payment of bonuses, shall equal 15% of Cash Flow.        
Allocation of Bonus Pool to Executives
	
			
	Executive Name
	Executive Title
	Percent of Pool Allocated 
to Executive1

	Jack A. Hockema
	Chief Executive Officer
	38.1635%

	John M. Donnan
	EVP - Legal, Compliance and Human Resources
	17.2712%

	Peter Bunin
	SVP - Operations 
	17.2712%

	Keith Harvey
	SVP - Sales and Marketing, Aerospace and General Engineering
	16.9326%

	[Other Designated Participant]
	[Designated Participant Title]
	10.3614%






1 Subject to an aggregate maximum bonus opportunity per executive of $5.0 million per calendar year, pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan.


Administrative Provisions


The 2014 STI Umbrella Plan only applies to the calculation and award of incentive awards, if any.  There will be no duplication of benefits created by the 2014 STI Umbrella Plan.


The 2014 STI Umbrella Plan will not increase any benefits that may be payable under any severance and/or change in control agreements.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Case No. 09-12950

Plaintiff, Honorable David M. Lawson

v.

JOHN J. BRAVATA, RICHARD J. 

TRABULSY, ANTONIO M. BRAVATA,

BBC EQUITIES, LLC, BRAVATA 

FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, and SHARI A. 

BRAVATA,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER STRIKING MOTIONS FILED BY HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK

The matter is before the Court on several motions filed by Huntington National Bank, an

entity wishing to intervene in the present action. Huntington National Bank filed its motion to

intervene on October 9, 2009, and the hearing on that motion is scheduled for February 10, 2010.

Since filing its motion to intervene, Huntington National Bank filed three other motions

asking the Court for affirmative relief concerning assets subject to the preliminary injunction.

However, Huntington National Bank cannot request relief from the Court until it is allowed to

intervene by the Court. Consequently, the Court will strike Huntington National Bank’s motions

filed after its motion to intervene.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Huntington National Bank’s motion for amendment of

a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and order appointing receiver to exclude the

P&R and Rockland properties [dkt. # 134], motion for limited relief from the order for preliminary

injunction freezing assets as to the Timberstone properties [dkt. # 141], and motion for limited relief

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 146 Filed 11/13/2009 Page 1 of 2
-2-

from orders for preliminary injunction freezing assets as to the Amberwood property [dkt. # 142]

are STRICKEN from the record. The hearing on Huntington National Bank’s motion for

amendment of a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and order appointing receiver

to exclude the P&R and Rockland properties [dkt. # 134] currently scheduled for November 23,

2009 is CANCELLED.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 13, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 13, 2009.

s/Teresa Scott-Feijoo 

TERESA SCOTT-FEIJOO

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 146 Filed 11/13/2009 Page 2 of 2
Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al Doc. 42 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re:

YONG MI SHANNON, Case No. 09-CV-12710

Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

Debtor.

__________________________________/ 

ACCLAIM LEGAL SERVICE, P.L.L.C., 

Bankruptcy Case No. 09-40867

Appellant, Hon. Steven W. Rhodes

vs. 

DAVID W. ALLARD, 

Chapter 7 Trustee,

 Appellee. 

 /

JUDGMENT

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to this Court’s Opinion and Order dated

March , 2010, this cause of action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated at Port Huron, Michigan, this 25th day of March, 2010.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: s/Marie E. Verlinde 

MARIE VERLINDE

APPROVED:

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

S:\Zatkoff\Marie ECF\shannon.bankruptcy.judgment.wpd
Exhibit
31.1





SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION





I,
Charles A. Dinarello, certify that:





1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Omni Bio Pharmaceutical,
Inc.





2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and





(d) Omitted #





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) Omitted #





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date:  July
      31, 2009
                /s/ Charles A. Dinarello,
      M.D.Charles
      A. Dinarello, M.D.Acting
      Chief Executive Officer





#
Pursuant to Division of Corporate Finance – Compliance and Disclosure
Interpretations – Regulation S-K, Section 215.02.  Items 308
and 308T – Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20301

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

MICHAEL DONALD GRIMSHAW,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On October 1, 2009, the case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

October 1, 2009. In open court I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed

by Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly and intelligently made;

and (3) that the offense(s) to which he pled are supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have ordered the

preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:09-cr-20301-TLL-CEB Doc # 7 Filed 10/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 39
II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and

Recommendation within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins.

Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984

(6th Cir. 2005). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and

Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security, 474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir.

2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of

any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: October 2, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on Matthew Roth and Kenneth Sasse, and served on District Judge

Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: October 2, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

1:09-cr-20301-TLL-CEB Doc # 7 Filed 10/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 40
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4225

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade and fisheries for the vessel HEY, DA!.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Mr. BASS (by request) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade and fisheries

for the vessel HEY, DA!.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and sections 12106

6 and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation
2

•HR 4225 IH

1 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

2 coastwise trade and fisheries for the vessel HEY, DA!

3 (United States official number 1032531).

Æ