alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby provides notice of the membership of its Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Commission's Senior Executive Service (SES) members. The function of this board is to make recommendations relating to the performance of senior executives in the Commission. This action is undertaken in accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., section 4314(c)(4). The Commission's PRB will remove the following member: John S. Moot. 

And will add the following member: Joseph H. McClelland. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E8-17874 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
H. R. 419

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

(a) FINDING.—The Congress finds that Benchmark Rail Group,

Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily performed emergency work

after the Northridge earthquake, but has not been reimbursed

as a result of a technicality under California State law.

(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to fairly compensate

Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for which, except for

the technicality under California State law, it would otherwise

have been paid under the provisions of the Robert T. Stafford

Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121).

SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the date of

enactment of this Act, the director of the Federal Emergency

Management Agency shall pay to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.,

of St. Louis, Missouri, an amount equal to the total amount owed

to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of California to compensate Benchmark

Rail Group, Inc., for the emergency work and services performed

at the request of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority,

to the extent that such work and services are otherwise eligible

for reimbursement under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121). The payment shall be made

from funds appropriated to implement such Act.

(b) DEOBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Federal Emergency Management Agency shall deobligate an equal amount to that obligated

previously for payment to the State of California to cover the

costs of work performed for the Southern California Regional Rail

Authority by Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., after the Northridge
H. R. 419—2

earthquake which would have been eligible for reimbursement

under such Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
31.1




**Section
302 Certification**
  I,
William Linton, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Call-Net
Enterprises Inc., certify that:
 
 1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Call-Net
Enterprises Inc. ;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:
  (a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 
 (b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
February 22, 2005.
  /s/
      William LintonName:
      William LintonTitle:
      President & Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ANDERSON LEE FERNANDERS,

Plaintiff,

Civil No. 09-12933

Hon. John Feikens

Mag. Judge Donald Scheer 

v.

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

COMMUNITY HEALTH,

Defendant. 

________________________________

ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

I have before me, Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer’s Report and

Recommendation (“Report”) (Docket #15). In his Report, Magistrate Judge Scheer

recommends that I grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss because of Plaintiff’s failure to

provide a right to sue letter from the EEOC. Magistrate Judge Scheer also recommends

that Plaintiff’s claims under Michigan’s Whistleblower Protection Act be dismissed for

failure to state a claim. Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Report, and attached his right

to sue letter from the EEOC. Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiff’s Objection. In its

Response, Defendant requests that the Report be adopted as to Plaintiff’s claims under

Michigan’s Whistleblower Protection Act and that the Court return Defendant’s Motion

to Dismiss to Magistrate Judge Scheer for further consideration of the other grounds in

the Motion. Plaintiff filed a Reply, asserting that his whistleblower claims are based on

2:09-cv-12933-AC-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 11/23/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 116
“§ 5328" without further explanation. Plaintiff appears to be referencing the

whistleblower protections in 31 U.S.C. § 5328. I fail to see how 31 U.S.C. § 5328, which

provides protection for those reporting violations involving financial transactions,

applies to the allegations in this case. Having considered the arguments set forth by the

parties, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Scheer’s Report as it relates to Plaintiff’s

whistleblower claims and DISMISS Plaintiff’s whistleblower claims (Count Seven). In

light of Plaintiff’s production of a right to sue letter, I RETURN Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss to Magistrate Judge Scheer for consideration of the other grounds for dismissal

set forth in the Motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: November 23, 2009 s/ John Feikens 

John Feikens

United States District Judge

 

Proof of Service

I hereby certify that the foregoing order was served on

the attorneys/parties of record on November 23, 2009,

by U.S. first class mail or electronic means.

s/Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12933-AC-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 11/23/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 117
Exhibit 4.36

 

Power of Attorney

 

THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY (hereinafter, the “Power of Attorney”) is executed by Weijie MA (ID card No.:     ) as of December 31, 2013 and issued to Xin ZHOU (ID card No.:     ) (hereinafter, the “Entrusted Person”).

 

I, Weijie MA, hereby entrust the Entrusted Person with full representative power to exercise the following rights owned by me in the capacity of a shareholder of Shanghai Kushuo Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “Company”) on my behalf:

 

(1)                     As my representative, to propose to convene and attend Shareholders’ meetings of the Company according to the articles of association of the Company;;

 

(2)                     As my representative, to exercise voting rights on all matters requiring discussion or resolutions of the Shareholders’ meetings of the Company, including without limitation, the appointment and election of the Company’s directors and other officers to be appointed and removed by the Shareholders;;

 

(3)                     As my representative, to exercise other voting rights of a shareholder as specified in the articles of association of the Company (including any other shareholder voting rights as specified in the amended articles of association).

 

I hereby irrevocably confirm that this Power of Attorney shall continue to be valid until the Shareholder Voting Right Proxy Agreement executed by and between Shanghai Yifang Software Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “WFOE”), the Company and the Shareholders of the Company as of December 31, 2013 expires or is early terminated, unless the WFOE gives me a direction to replace the Entrusted Person.

 

 

Authorization is hereby made.

 

 

	
 
    	
Name:   Weijie MA
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/   Weijie Ma
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Date:   December 31, 2013
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Xenacare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank Rizzo, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| |                        
| |                        
| | /s/ Frank Rizzo        
| | Frank Rizzo            
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | April 20, 2010
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BILLY MILES,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-11383

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

vs.

DOMINIC VERDERESE,

 

Defendant.

______________________________/

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 27, 2009. No objections were filed thereto.

This Court had an opportunity to fully review this matter and believes that the Magistrate

Judge has reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons.

ACCORDINGLY:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 27, 2009, is hereby accepted and adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED.

Dated: September 22, 2009 S/Bernard A. Friedman_______________

Detroit, Michigan BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-11383-BAF-DAS Doc # 17 Filed 09/22/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 98
Case 2:09-cr-20382-SJM-MAR Document 6 Filed 08/21/2009 Page 1 of 1
#### Gailla J. HUTSON, Appellant, v. Jearld R. HUTSON, Respondent.

No. WD 49715.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 31, 1995.

Daniel D. Lane, Independence, for appellant.

Michael W. Hanna, Raytown, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Wife appeals the trial court’s judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage, dividing their property, and awarding custody of their two children to the father. There is no precedential purpose in publishing a written opinion and therefore, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4158 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4158

 To exclude certain general service wages and hours associated with a 
    separate skilled nursing facility owned by certain hospitals in 
     determining a hospital's eligibility for continued geographic 
              reclassification under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 1996

Mr. Ramstad (for himself and Mr. Minge) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To exclude certain general service wages and hours associated with a 
    separate skilled nursing facility owned by certain hospitals in 
     determining a hospital's eligibility for continued geographic 
              reclassification under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUDING GENERAL SERVICE WAGES AND HOURS ASSOCIATED WITH A 
              SEPARATE SKILLED NURSING FACILITY IN DETERMINING MEDICARE 
              GEOGRAPHIC RECLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN HOSPITALS.

    In the case of a hospital that is owned by a municipality and that 
has been reclassified as an urban hospital under section 1886(d)(10) of 
the Social Security Act for fiscal year 1996, in calculating the 
hospital's average hourly wage for purposes of continued geographic 
reclassification under such section for subsequent fiscal years, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services shall exclude the general 
service wages and hours of personnel associated with a skilled nursing 
facility that is owned by the hospital or the same municipality and 
that is physically separated from the hospital to the extent that such 
wages and hours of such personnel are not shared with the hospital and 
are separately documented.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17913]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Impact of Cultural and Socioeconomic Factors on Post-
Treatment Surveillance Among African Americans With Colorectal Cancer, 
Potential Extramural Project 2008-R-03

    Notice of Cancellation: This notice was published in the Federal 
Register on July 22, 2008, Volume 73, Number 141, page 42576. The 
meeting previously scheduled to convene on August 6, 2008 has been 
cancelled.
    Contact Person for More Information: Linda Shelton, Program 
Specialist, Coordinating Center for Health and Information Service, 
Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
1600 Clifton Road, NE., MS E21, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone (404) 498-
1194.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: July 28, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8-17913 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-5, PageID.93 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-5, PageID.94 Filed 07/27/11 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-5, PageID.95 Filed 07/27/11 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-5, PageID.96 Filed 07/27/11 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-5, PageID.97 Filed 07/27/11 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-5, PageID.98 Filed 07/27/11 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                1,468
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        57,503
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     86,458
<PP&E>                              176,557
<DEPRECIATION>                       53,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      232,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                42,266
<BONDS>                             148,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                 59
<OTHER-SE>                           28,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        232,497
<SALES>                             310,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    310,133
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       304,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   14,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (9,898)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (3,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (6,598)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (6,598)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (1.15)

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Team Nation Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i) the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Daniel J. DuffyDaniel J. DuffyPrincipal Financial Officer





This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### SERIO et ux. v. ORLEANS ICE MFG. CO., Inc. *

No. 14273.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 22, 1933.

J. A. Morales, of New Orleans, for appellants.

Pomes & McCabe, of New Orleans, for ap-pellee.

*

Rehearing denied June 12, 1933. Writ of certiorari denied July 14, 1933.

WESTERJTIELD, Judge.

This is a suit by a father and mother for compensation for the death of their son. All *essential facts, with the exception of*the dependency of deceased’s parents, are admitted and upon that issue the court, a quo, rendered judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ suit.

Joseph Serio and his wife, plaintiffs, Mrs. Carrilles, their married daughter, Mr. Oar-rilles, their son-in-law, and Anthony Serio, their son, all testified to the same effect. They •declared that the deceased, Joseph Serio, Jr., was paid $22.50 per week by his employer, •defendant herein; that he gave the entire amount to his mother every week; and that she returned to him $2 each week for spending money.

The succession of the deceased, Joseph 'Serio, Jr., was opened in the civil district •court, and 'it appeared that he died possessed ■of a credit on the books of the American Homestead Association of $770.57 and a deposit in the Whitney Trust & Savings Bank of $741.17. The records of these institutions indicated that this money had been accumulated in a space of about two years just prior to his death. Joseph Serio, the father, was shown to have a credit in the same homestead of about $2,000. In explanation of the relatively large savings of the deceased, his family stated that the savings were not made from his earnings, but represented his winnings in gambling ventures which he had undertaken with the small capital of $2 per week advanced by his mother.

The possession of $1,400 by the deceased and $2,000 by the parent accumulated during the space of two years would not, in itself, be of importance in determining the question of dependency, but evidently the trial judge believed it discredited the testimony of deceased’s family to the effect that he gave all of his salary with the exception of $2 per week to his mother. The conclusion is irresistible that the learned judge, a quo, did not believe plaintiffs and their witnesses, because he rendered judgment against plaintiffs in spite of the fact that the evidence, if believed, would establish a perfect case of dependency. The circumstances are suspicious and the explanation given of the savings of deceased as having been accomplished through gambling ventures upon the meager capital of $2 per week most improbable.

The credibility of the witnesses being the all-important factor in this ease, we feel that the judgment of the trial court should not be disturbed in view of the unsatisfactory character of the preponderating testimony.

Por the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.