alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   **Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jordan Shapiro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/*Jordan Shapiro*Jordan ShapiroPresident and Chief Executive Officer

July 19, 2011

                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ramin (“Ron”) Najafi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 12, 2009











/s/ Ramin (“Ron”) Najafi


_________________________________





Ramin (“Ron”) Najafi


Chief Executive Officer and President








This Certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 USC Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 31.3





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Warren G. Lichtenstein, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Steel Connect, Inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.








Date: November 30, 2020


By:/S/ WARREN G. LICHTENSTEINWarren G. LichtensteinInterim Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Michael Noble, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Lucky
     Strike Explorations Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of June, 2007.


/s/ Michael Noble
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/22/2015 1:30:38 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper
      Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the “Form
      10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      September 12, 2007





/s/Andrew
                A. Brodkey
              Andrew
                A. Brodkey, CEO and President
              (Chief
                Executive Officer and President of Pacific Copper
                Corp.)





Dated:
      September12, 2007




/s/Rakesh
                Malhotra
              Rakesh
                Malhotra, C.A., Chief Financial Officer
              (Chief
                Financial Officer of Pacific Copper
                Corp.)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Group Realty Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul G. Del Vecchio, Senior Vice President—Capital Markets of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Paul G. Del Vecchio

 

 

Paul G. Del Vecchio

Senior Vice President—Capital Markets

March 15, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11311 and #11312]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA–1773–DR), dated 06/28/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/18/2008.                    

*Effective Date:*                         07/18/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/27/2008.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         03/30/2009.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 06/28/2008 is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/18/2008.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8–17538 Filed 7–30–08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: September 18, 2014 105657 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTHONY R. BOTTE JR.,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: August 4, 2014

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.

__________

Randolph V. Kruman, Cortland, for appellant.

Joseph A. McBride, District Attorney, Norwich (Michael J.

Genute of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chenango

County (Sullivan, J.), rendered October 14, 2011, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the

first degree.

In satisfaction of a three-count indictment, defendant

pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree. Under the terms

of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced to five years in

prison to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision

and was to waive his right to appeal. During the plea

proceedings, County Court agreed to release defendant on a oneweek furlough so that he could spend time with his children

before sentencing, but admonished him that a condition of his

release was that he not consume alcohol or drugs. When he

reappeared for sentencing, it was disclosed that defendant had

tested positive for THC. As a result, County Court imposed an
-2- 105657 

enhanced sentence of six years in prison to be followed by five

years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.

Defendant argues that County Court erred in imposing an

enhanced sentence without first conducting a hearing to determine

if he, in fact, violated the conditions of his release by smoking

marihuana while he was on furlough. We note that this issue has

not been preserved due to defendant's failure to object to the

enhanced sentence on this basis or to move to withdraw his plea

on this ground (see People v Wachtel, 117 AD3d 1203 [2014], lv

denied ___ NY3d ___ [July 24, 2014]; People v Bucknor, 116 AD3d

1233, 1234 [2014]). In any event, County Court afforded

defendant an opportunity to respond and, given the positive test

results and defendant's admission to smoking marihuana, assured

itself that the enhanced sentence was based upon reliable and

accurate information (see People v Kocher, 116 AD3d 1301, 1302

[2014]; People v Paneto, 112 AD3d 1230, 1231 [2013], lv denied

___ NY3d ___ [June 27, 2014]; People v Saucier, 69 AD3d 1125,

1126 [2010]). Defendant's claim that he smoked marihuana while

in jail does not compel a contrary conclusion under the

circumstances presented here. Therefore, we find no basis to

disturb the sentence imposed.

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18005]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. RT01-99-000, etc.]


Regional Transmission Organizations, et al.; Notice

July 31, 2008.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regional Transmission Organizations....  RT01-99-000, RT01-99-001, RT01-
                                          99-002 and RT01-99-003.
Bangor Hydro-Electric Company, et al...  RT01-86-000, RT01-86-001 and
                                          RT01-86-002.
New York Independent System Operator,    RT01-95-000, RT01-95-001 and
 Inc., et al..                            RT01-95-002.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.....  RT01-2-000, RT01-2-001, RT01-2-
                                          002 and RT01-2-003.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.............  RT01-98-000.
ISO New England, Inc. New York           RT02-3-000.
 Independent System Operator, Inc..
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notice

    Take notice that PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., New York Independent 
System Operator, Inc. and ISO New England, Inc. have posted on their 
internet Web sites information updating their progress on the 
resolution of RTO seams.
    Any person desiring to file comments on this information should 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure Docket No. RT01-99-000, et 
al.
    (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such comments should be filed on 
or before the comment date. Comments may be filed electronically via 
the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the 
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. 
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
    Comment Date: August 21, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18005 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 445

To name the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier designated as CVN–76 the

U.S.S. Harry S Truman.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 9, 1995

Mr. SKELTON (for himself and Mr. EMERSON) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on National Security

A BILL

To name the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier designated as

CVN–76 the U.S.S. Harry S Truman.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NAMING OF NEXT NUCLEAR-POWERED AIR4 CRAFT CARRIER THE U.S.S. HARRY S TRU5 MAN.

6 The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier designated as

7 CVN–76 shall be named the U.S.S. Harry S Truman.

Æ
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
HEALTH DISCOVERY CORPORATION, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1446

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 6:20

- cv

- 00666

- ADA, Judge Alan D. Albright.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before L OURIE
, T ARANTO
, and H UGHES
, Circuit Judge s

. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R

Health Discovery Corporation (HDC) moves pursuant
to Rule 42(b) of the Federal Rule s of Appellate Procedure to dismiss this appeal and “requests an accompanying remand order

. ” Mot. at 2. HDC states that Intel Corporation consents to dismissal but does not consent to remand. Case: 22-1446 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 05/26/2022HEALTH DISCOVERY CORPORATION v. INTEL CORPORATION 2

HDC appeal ed from the district court’s decision dismiss ing HDC’s complaint without prejudice after concluding that HDC failed to plead allegations supporting the eligibility of the asserted claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101. HDC states that it has now “ commenced a new civil action in the same court, adding pleading al legations that [HDC] believes overcomes the dismissal rationale ” and “no longerwishes to pursue its appeal of the original dismissal without prejudice.” Mot. at 2. HDC , however, requests remand to “ provide the district court the maximum ability to determine whether the newly

- filed civil action should proceed under the case number of the present original matter, or the case number of the new pleading .” Id . at 3.
Upon consideration thereof

, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal is remanded for the limited purpose of allowing the district

court to consider any request by HDC to allow its new action to proceed under the origin ating case number and to move forward based on the ruling on any such request

. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

May 2 6 , 2022 Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: May 26, 2022 Case: 22-1446 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 05/26/2022