alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

          I,Glenn A. MacFarlane, certify that:

          1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TIAA-CREF U.S. RealEstate Fund I, L.P.; 

          2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

          a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

          b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

          c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

          a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

          b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

KHADIM MBACKE,

Defendant.

/

CASE NO. 08-20641

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER RELEASING DEFENDANT FROM THE

 CUSTODY OF THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL

On April 10, 2009 the Defendant appeared before this Court with counsel for

sentencing. The Defendant was sentenced to time served and was ordered to be deported

forthwith. The Court being fully advised in the premises, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant is to be released from the custody of

the United States Marshal into the custody of INS to be deported immediately.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 10, 2009 s/ Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:08-cr-20641-AC-RSW Doc # 15 Filed 04/10/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 27
Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C./Attorneys At Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

RAY M. HARRISON,

Plaintiff,

v

COMMERCIAL BANK,

Defendant.

Case No. 5:09-cv-12666

Hon. John Corbett O'Meara

Richard H. Ebbott (P13085)

Morrissey, Bove & Ebbott

Attorneys for Plaintiff

221 W. 5th Street

Flint, MI 48502

810-238-0455

810-238-0458 (fax)

mbebbott@sbcglobal.net

Michael T. Harrison (CA 158983)

Law Offices of Michael T. Harrison

Co-Counsel for Plaintiff

25876 The Old Road, Suite 304

Stevenson Ranch, CA 91381

661-257-2854

661-257-3068 (fax)

mharrison30@aol.com

Scott A. Chernich (P48893)

Deanna Swisher (P38341)

Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C.

Attorneys for Defendant

313 S. Washington Square

Lansing, MI 48933

517-371-8136

517-371-8200 (fax)

dswisher@fosterswift.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 4, 2009, I served a copy of Defendant Commercial Bank's

Requests to Admit, Interrogatories, and Document Requests to Plaintiff by first-class mail upon

the following: Richard H. Ebbott, Morrissey, Bove & Ebbott, 221 W. 5th Street, Flint, MI 48502

and Michael T. Harrison, Law Offices of Michael T. Harrison, 25876 The Old Road, Suite 304,

Stevenson Ranch, CA 91381.

Case 5:09-cv-12666-JCO-DAS Document 7 Filed 08/04/2009 Page 1 of 2
2

Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C./Attorneys At Law Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C./Attorneys At Law Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C./Attorneys At Law

By: /s/ Deanna Swisher

Deanna Swisher (P38341)

Foster, Swift, Collins & Smith, P.C.

313 S. Washington Square

Lansing, MI 48933

517-371-8136

dswisher@fosterswift.com

716610_1.DOC

Case 5:09-cv-12666-JCO-DAS Document 7 Filed 08/04/2009 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL RENNER,

Petitioner

v.

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

LEHIGH COUNTY, COUNTY OF 

LEHIGH, JOHN J. SIKORA AND MARK 

SUROVY,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 851 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Did the Legislature intend for the Unified Judicial System to be within the 

definition of “employer” under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Law, and 

therefore abrogated its sovereign immunity as stated in the en banc

decision in County of Allegheny v. Wilcox, 465 A.2d 47 (Pa. Cmwth. 

1983)[?]

(2) Does the application of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to the 

Unified Judicial System violate separation of powers so long as the Human 

Relations Commission neither investigates nor adjudicates the complaint of 

discrimination, as this Court held in Ct. of Com. Pleas of Erie County (6th

Jud. Dist.), Juv. Probation Dept. v. Pennsylvania Human Rel. Commn., 682 

A.2d 1246 (Pa. 1996) and First Jud. Dist. of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania 

Human Rel. Comm’n., 727 A.2d 1110 (Pa. 1999)?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFREY CLYDE MURRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEESLEY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

/

Case Number: 2:09-CV-11764

HON. NANCY G. EDMUNDS

ORDER OF TRANSFER

Plaintiff Jeffrey Clyde Murray has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §

1983. 

Venue is appropriate in the judicial district where either all defendants reside or where

the claims arose. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b); Al-Muhaymin v. Jones, 895 F.2d 1147 (6th Cir. 1990). 

Plaintiff complains of events which took place during his incarceration at the Baraga

Correctional Facility in Baraga County, Michigan, and the Alger Correctional Facility in Alger

County, Michigan. Baraga and Alger Counties lies in the Western District of Michigan. See 28

U.S.C. § 102(b)(2). All of the named defendants are employed at either the Baraga or Alger

Correctional Facilities. Thus, they too are located in the Western District of Michigan. See id.

Therefore, venue is not appropriate in this district. The Court will transfer the matter to the

district where the claim arose and the defendants reside, the Western District of Michigan. 

2:09-cv-11764-NGE-PJK Doc # 4 Filed 05/15/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 28
2

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to transfer the Court file to the

Western District of Michigan. 

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: May 15, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on May 15, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-11764-NGE-PJK Doc # 4 Filed 05/15/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 29
231 So.2d 137

#### Ex parte Evelyn BUCHANON. In re CULLMAN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. Evelyn BUCHANON.

6 Div. 773.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 5, 1970.

Evelyn Buchanon, pro se.

James F. Berry, Cullman, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We do not desire that our denial of the writ in this case is to be considered as approval of that part of the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals pertaining to the question of the operation of laches.

Writ denied.

All Justices concur, except MADDOX, J., not sitting
#### UNITED STATES of America v. C. G. HOWLAND, Proponent of the Last Will and Testament of George G. Johnnie, Deceased.

No. 1676.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

March 4, 1938.

Charles N. Champion, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Muskogee, Okl., for appellant.

J. E. Williams, of Ardmore, Old., for appellee.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed, on motion of appellant.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Inez Genevive McMULLIN, Appellant.

No. WD 50301.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 21, 1995.

*767David Simpson, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Inez Genevive McMullin appeals her conviction of four counts of forgery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46040-46041]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18167]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

TA-W-63,164


SB Acquisition, LLC, d/b/a Saunders Brothers, Fryeburg, ME; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 9, 2008 in response to a worker 
petition filed by the Maine State Workforce

[[Page 46041]]

Office on behalf of workers at SB Acquisition, LLC, d/b/a Saunders 
Brothers, Fryeburg, Maine.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 29th day of July 2008.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-18167 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3140

RONALD P. ALLY,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in DA0831080497-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The court treats the informal brief filed by the petitioner as a motion for leave to

file the brief out of time.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

The respondent should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of

this order.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 2 2 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date

cc:	Ronald P. Ally

Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo, Esq.

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s8

	

MAY 2 2 2009

Jtsit tlOkorita

CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BENJAMIN THOMAS III,

Plaintiff,

CIVIL NO.: 09-13397

v. HON. LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, which

was filed after Plaintiff filed a complaint challenging Defendant’s decision to deny Plaintiff

Social Security disability benefits. The Court is also in receipt of Magistrate Judge R. Steven

Whalen’s Report and Recommendation, wherein the Magistrate Judge recommends that: (1)

Plaintiff’s cause of action be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute, or (2) in the

alternative, (2) Defendant’s Motion for a Summary Judgment be granted. Plaintiff has filed

an objection to the Report and Recommendation.

After a thorough review of the court file and the Report and Recommendation and the

objections to the Report and Recommendation filed by Plaintiff, this Court will adopt the

Report and Recommendation and enter it as the findings and conclusions of this Court. 

2:09-cv-13397-LPZ-RSW Doc # 25 Filed 03/23/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 459
2

Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that: (1) Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment is GRANTED, and (2) Plaintiff’s cause of action is hereby DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 23, 2012

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of

record by electronic or U.S. mail on March 23, 2012.

s/Marie E. Verlinde 

Case Manager

(810) 984-3290

2:09-cv-13397-LPZ-RSW Doc # 25 Filed 03/23/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 460
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-3-2006

In Re: NBR Antitrust

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-4535

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: NBR Antitrust " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 245.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/245
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-4535

 

IN RE: NBR ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CROMPTON CORPORATION; UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., 

Appellants

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 03-cv-01898)

District Judge: Honorable David S. Cercone.

 

Argued on September 26, 2006

Before: RENDELL, CHAGARES and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

(Opinion Filed November 2, 2006)

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the not-published Opinion in the above case, filed on

November 2, 2006, be amended as follows:

On page 1, delete “v.” from caption.
Dated: November 3, 2006
2006 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 11-3-2006 

# In Re: NBR Ant itr u s t P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 05-4535

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2006 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" In Re: NBR An t itr us t " (2006). 2006 D e cisio n s . P ape r 245. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006/245NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL
UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT
N o. 05- 4535
I N R E : NB R A NT I T RU S T L I T I GAT I ON
C R O M P T O N C O R P O R A T IO N ; U N IR O Y A L C H E M IC A L C O M P A N Y , IN C ., A p p e llan ts
O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e W e ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C
. N o. 03- cv- 01898) D i s t r i ctJ udge: H onor abl e D avi d S. C er cone.
A r gued on Sept ember 26, 2006 B efore: R E N D E L L , C H A G A R E S and R O T H , C i rcui tJudg es.

( O pi ni on Fi l ed N ovember 2, 2006) R O T H , C i rcui t Judge: OR DE R A M E ND I NG OP I NI ON I T I S OR DERED t hatt he not
- publ i s hed O pi ni on i n t he above cas e, fi l ed on N ov em ber 2, 20 06 , be am end ed as fo l l ow s: O n page 1 , del et e “v. ” fr om capt i on.Dated: November 3, 2006
NOTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ERIC J. KATZ,
Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent

______________________

2022

- 1473

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in No. DC

- 1221

- 20

- 0079 -W- 2.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K EVIN E DWARD B YRNES

, Fluet, Tysons, VA, argued for petitioner. Also represented by G RACE H. W ILLIAMS ; R ACHEL L EAHEY , FH+H, PLLC, Tysons, VA.

E LIZABETH A NNE S PECK

, Commercial LitigationBranch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, arg ued for respondent. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON

, E LIZABETH M ARIE H OSFORD

, P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY

.

______________________ Case: 22-1473 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 06/06/2024THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, B RYSON

, and R EYNA

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

June 6 , 2024
Date Case: 22-1473 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 06/06/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          51,932
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               516,510
<PP&E>                                       5,376,271
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,631,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,856,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,700
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,771,454)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,631,552
<SALES>                                        758,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               852,569
<CGS>                                          191,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,576,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,275,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,376,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,376,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,376,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.57)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. McKelvey, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Skyview
Development Corp.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 1, 2007                    By: /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
       ----------------                        -----------------------------
                                               Donald R. McKelvey, President
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)