alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERTA COLVARD,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-cv-13012

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

v.

Michael Hluchaniuk

United States Magistrate Judge

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER

(1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; 

(2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2)

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk’s August 18, 2010 Report and

Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 8) and

granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 12). Neither party has filed timely

objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d). 

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of fact and discussion of law, and there

being no objections by either party, the Court:

(1) ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13);
2

(2) GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 12); and

(3) DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 8). 

SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 7, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

September 7, 2010.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Leonard Green 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: July 02, 2012 

 

Mr. David J. Weaver 

U.S. District Court 

for the Eastern District of Michigan 

231 W. Lafayette Boulevard 

Fifth Floor Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse 

Detroit, MI 48226-0000 

 Re: Case No. 11-1426, FMIO, Inc., et al v. Township of Summerfield, et al

Originating Case No. : 2:09-CV-12561 

Dear Mr. Weaver: 

 Enclosed is a copy of the mandate filed in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Karen S. Fultz 

Case Manager 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7036 

cc: Mr. Frederick Lucas 

 Ms. Cindy Rhodes Victor 

Enclosure 

 

Case 2:09-cv-12561-BAF-MKM ECF No. 50 filed 07/02/12 PageID.729 Page 1 of 2 Case: 11-1426 Document: 006111355738 Filed: 07/02/2012 Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

 

________________ 

 No: 11-1426 

________________ 

 

 Filed: July 02, 2012 

FMIO, INC.; RICHARD A. GARST 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants 

v. 

TOWNSHIP OF SUMMERFIELD 

 Defendant - Appellee 

 

MANDATE

 Pursuant to the court's disposition that was filed 05/17/2012 the mandate for this case hereby 

issues today. 

 

COSTS: None 

Case 2:09-cv-12561-BAF-MKM ECF No. 50 filed 07/02/12 PageID.730 Page 2 of 2 Case: 11-1426 Document: 006111355738 Filed: 07/02/2012 Page: 2
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 1 of 23 Pg ID 44
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 2 of 23 Pg ID 45
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 3 of 23 Pg ID 46
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 4 of 23 Pg ID 47
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 5 of 23 Pg ID 48
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 6 of 23 Pg ID 49
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 7 of 23 Pg ID 50
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 8 of 23 Pg ID 51
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 9 of 23 Pg ID 52
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 10 of 23 Pg ID 53
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 11 of 23 Pg ID 54
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 12 of 23 Pg ID 55
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 13 of 23 Pg ID 56
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 14 of 23 Pg ID 57
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 15 of 23 Pg ID 58
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 16 of 23 Pg ID 59
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 17 of 23 Pg ID 60
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 18 of 23 Pg ID 61
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 19 of 23 Pg ID 62
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 20 of 23 Pg ID 63
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 21 of 23 Pg ID 64
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 22 of 23 Pg ID 65
5:09-cv-12687-JCO-DAS Doc # 14-1 Filed 10/08/10 Pg 23 of 23 Pg ID 66
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2506-144-MI]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed Upper Peninsula Power Company's proposed shoreline management plan for the Escanaba Hydroelectric Project, located on the Middle Branch of the Escanaba River in Marquette County, Michigan, and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA).

                    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*                     using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number (P-2506) excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                           ( print page 46001)    *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*                     or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

Any comments on the EA should be filed by August 29, 2008, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, Washington, DC 20426. Please reference the project name and project number (P-2506) on all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the “eFiling” link. For further information, contact Jon Cofrancesco at (202) 502-8951.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E8-18060 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4118 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4118

To amend the Antiquities Act to limit the authority of the President to 
designate areas in excess of 5,000 acres as national monuments, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 19, 1996

  Mr. Hansen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Antiquities Act to limit the authority of the President to 
designate areas in excess of 5,000 acres as national monuments, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION OF ANTIQUITIES ACT AUTHORITY.

    Section 2 of the Act of June 8, 1906 (34 Stat. 225; 16 U.S.C 431, 
432, 433), commonly known as the Antiquities Act, is amended by adding 
the following at the end thereof: ``The President may not exercise the 
authority of this section to declare any area in excess of 5,000 acres 
to be a national monument.''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT.

    The amendment made by section 1 of this Act shall apply with 
respect to any proclamation issued by the President after January 1, 
1996.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 10, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 14
- 01567
- CV GHANDI GAY , Appellant V. FALCON'S LAIR HOMEOW NERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 09640 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang

- Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Francis The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated December 15, 2014, we notified appellant the $1 9 5 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that
failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated December 15, 2015, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant tha t failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated February 10, 2015, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that– 2

– failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the clerk’s

recor d. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5; 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

141567F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
GHANDI GAY, Appellant
No. 05

- 14

- 01567

- CV V.
FALCON'S LAIR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 14

- 09640. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. Justices Lang

- Miers and Whiteh ill participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee FALCON'S LAIR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant GHANDI GAY.
Judgment entered this 10th day of July, 2015.
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GLENN MAYBIN, No. 09-13755

Plaintiff, District Judge Avern Cohn

v. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

RAYMOND BOOKER, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER DENYING COUNSEL AND DIRECTING RESPONSE

TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff Glenn Maybin, a prison inmate in the custody of the Michigan

Department of Corrections, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. Before the Court is his motion to appoint counsel [Docket #10].

Unlike criminal cases, there is no constitutional or statutory right to the

appointment of counsel in civil cases. Rather, the Court requests members of the bar to

assist in appropriate cases. In Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-606 (6th Cir. 1993),

the Sixth Circuit noted that “[a]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is not a

constitutional right. It is a privilege that is justified only by exceptional circumstances.”

(Internal quotations and citations omitted).

It is the practice of this Court to defer any attempt to obtain counsel for pro se civil

rights Plaintiffs until after all motions to dismiss or motions for summary judgment have
-2-

been denied. A motion to dismiss is presently pending. [Docket #8]. At this stage of the

proceedings, Plaintiffs’ request for counsel is premature.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Appoint Counsel [Docket #10] is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant Booker’s motion to dismiss [Docket #8]

on or before JULY 9, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

S/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: June 14, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served on the attorneys

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on June 14, 2010.

S/G. Wilson 

Judicial Assistant
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Anoteros, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George G. Chachas, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.










__________________________________________


By:
George G. Chachas


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




Dated:
July 31, 2008




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 32



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify
with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



Date:  March 12, 2004                   /s/ John E. Parker
       --------------------             ----------------------------------------
                                        John E. Parker
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Date:  March 12, 2004                   /s/ Leslie H. Gordon
       --------------------             ----------------------------------------
                                        Leslie H. Gordon
                                        Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Home
Buy & Sell Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel L. Baxter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ 
      Daniel L. BaxterDaniel
      L. Baxter
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                February
      19, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER98-2329-007]


Central Vermont Public Service Corporation; Notice of Filing

July 31, 2008.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2008, Central Vermont Public Service 
Corporation filed an updated market power analysis (Exh. CV-2 at 102), 
and Appendix B list of generation and transmission assets (Exh. CV-4), 
and revisions to its market-based rate power sales tariff, pursuant to 
Commission Order No. 697.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7b1b2a5b4b8999b9e9992a4828787988583b791928594d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c4a495e4f4362606562695f797c7c637e784c6a697e6f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 19, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18009 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,235]


Southprint, Inc., Reidsville Division, Reidsville, NC; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application postmarked July 7, 2008, a petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on 
May 29, 2008. The Notice of Determination was published in the Federal 
Register on June 16, 2008 (73 FR 34044).
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the finding that imports of screen printing for apparel did 
not contribute importantly to worker separations at the subject firm 
and no shift of production to a foreign source occurred.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided 
additional information about the customers of the subject firm.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of July 2008.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-18168 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 66 Filed 09/17/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 66 Filed 09/17/2009 Page 2 of 2
Supreme Court of the United States F L E P

Office of the Clerk

Washington, JUN 1 20 DC 20543-0001

WilliaJOiD GREEN, Clerk

Clerk of the Court

June 11,2012 (202)479-3011 10 I1—t

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

524 Potter Stewart Courthouse

100 East Fifth Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202

Re: Peter E. Hendrickson

v. United States

No. 11-1345

(Your No. 10-1726)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

4JLc2Z

William K. Suter, Clerk

 Case: 10-1726 Document: 006111333058 Filed: 06/11/2012 Page: 1 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Doc # 139 Filed 06/11/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 2258