alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECOND AMENDMENT 
                                    TO 
                           MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


	THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made 
and entered into as of July 1, 1997, by and between CFA MANAGEMENT, INC., a 
Florida corporation ("Manager"), and CINCINNATI LUBES, INC., a Florida 
corporation ("Owner").

RECITALS:

A.  Manager and Owner are parties to that certain Amended and Restated 
Management Agreement, dated August 15, 1988, as amended by that certain 
Amendment to Management Agreement dated September 9, 1993 (the "Agreement").
	
B.  Manager and Owner have agreed to modify the standard method of 
calculating fees owed to Manager as compensation under the Agreement for the 
three (3) month period ending September 30, 1997; and
 
C.  Manager and Owner desire to memorialize such modification on the 
terms and conditions set forth herein. 

    NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and 
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Owner and Manager agree as 
follows:

1.  The parties hereby agree that for the three (3) month period ending 
September 30, 1997, the calculation of the Management Fee shall be $ 
5,981.25
 
2.  All terms and conditions of the Management Agreement not amended by 
this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect except to the 
extent that they must be modified to effectuate the amendment 
contemplated by this instrument.  All defined terms shall have the same 
meaning as in the Management Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.
 
3.  Nothing contained herein shall imply or suggest similar 
modifications to the Agreement will be made in the future.  
 
4.  This instrument shall be governed by and construed in accordance 
with the laws of the State of Florida.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Manager and Owner hereunto set their hands and 
seals as of the day and year set forth above. 


Owner:						Manager:

CINCINNATI LUBES, INC.			CFA MANAGEMENT, INC.
					 
    /s/ Stephen P. Conway                   /s/ Jerry B. Conway
By: _________________________		By: _________________________
    Stephen P. Conway 				Jerry B. Conway,
    President 						President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          24,909
<SECURITIES>                                    12,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,590
<INVENTORY>                                     29,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,683
<PP&E>                                         343,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,396
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 366,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              121
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   366,204
<SALES>                                      1,396,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,415,371
<CGS>                                        1,102,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,368,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,767
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,919
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Destiny CULVER, by her next friend David ANDREWS, and David A. Andrews, Respondents, v. Carol CULVER, Appellant.

No. 69921.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 25, 1997.

Michael A. Forst, St. Louis, for appellant.

William B. Gillespie, Clayton, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the judgment modifying a paternity decree and transferring custody of the child to father. We affirm. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight .of the evidence; no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

L. TUCKER,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. PENTRICH, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-13246

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION [55], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT [47], AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [30] 

This matter comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation [55]. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record

and the pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff’s objections, the

Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment

[47] is DENIED, and Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [30] is DENIED IN PART

and GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s

claim of retaliation in connection with the issuance of misconduct tickets, and DENIED as

to Plaintiff’s remaining claims of excessive force, assault and battery, and retaliation.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: September 10, 2013

2:09-cv-13246-NGE-SDD Doc # 57 Filed 09/10/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 914
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on September 10,

2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams 

Case Manager

Acting in the Absence of Carol A. Hemeyer

2

2:09-cv-13246-NGE-SDD Doc # 57 Filed 09/10/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 915
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE PAGE 1 

NO. 03-15-00585-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN, TEXAS 

CATHY A. OLSEN, 

 APPELLANT, 

v. 

LPP MORTGAGE, LTD., 

 APPELLEE. 

Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court Case No. C-1-CV-15-002860 

Hon. Eric Shepperd, Presiding 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

Please take notice that the undersigned and the law firm of Mackie Wolf 

Zientz & Mann, P.C., hereby appear as counsel for Appellee LPP MORTGAGE, 

LP, and request all notices given or required to be given in this case, and all papers 

served or required to be served in this case, including, without limitation, notices 

and any orders, applications, complaints, demands, hearings, motions, petitions, 

pleadings or requests, and any other documents brought before this Court in this 

ACCEPTED

03-15-00585-CV

7035412

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

9/22/2015 1:14:40 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/22/2015 1:14:40 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE PAGE 2 

case, whether formal or informal, whether written or oral, and whether transmitted 

or conveyed by mail, telephone, facsimile or otherwise be served upon the 

undersigned attorney at the following address:

Mark D. Cronenwett 

MACKIE WOLF ZIENTZ & MANN, P.C. 

14160 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 900 

Dallas, Texas 75254 

Telephone: (214) 635-2650 

Facsimile: (214) 635-2686 

mcronenwett@mwzmlaw.com

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Mark D. Cronenwett 

 MARK D. CRONENWETT

 Texas Bar No. 00787303 

mcronenwett@mwzmlaw.com 

MACKIE WOLF ZIENTZ & MANN, 

PC 

14160 N. Dallas Parkway, Suite 900 

Dallas, Texas 75254 

(214) 635-2650 

(214) 635-2686 (Fax) 

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE 
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE PAGE 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on the 22nd day of September, 2015, a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing was served via regular U.S. mail to the pro se Appellant 

listed below: 

Cathy Olsen 

11405 Madrid Dr. 

Austin, TX 78759 

/s/ Mark D. Cronenwett___________ 

MARK D. CRONENWETT
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:09-cv-13510-RHC-MAR Document 1 Filed 09/04/2009 Page 8 of 8
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000681

04-JAN-2019

08:36 AM
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


                            PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC.
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Pervasive Software Co., Ltd. - Japan

Pervasive Software GmbH - Germany

Pervasive Software N.V. - Belgium

Pervasive Software (Ireland) Limited - Ireland

Pervasive Software Limited - United Kingdom

Pervasive Software North Asia Limited - Hong Kong

Pervasive Software S.A.R.L. - France

Pervasive Software Company - Canada

EveryWare Development Inc. - Canada

EveryWare Development Corporation - Canada

Pervasive Acquisition Corporation - Canada

Note:  EveryWare Development Inc., EveryWare Development Corporation, Pervasive
Acquisition Corporation and Pervasive Software Company were amalgamated under
Canadian law and continued as a single entity, Pervasive Software Company,
effective August 1, 1999.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**I, Jack P. Healey, Chief Financial Officer of the Industrial Distribution Group, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.Dated: March 14, 2007       /s/ Jack P. Healey Jack P. Healey    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1

                       EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
                              477 Martinsville Road
                          Liberty Corner, NJ 07938-0830
                            Telephone: (908) 604-3000



March 20, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

            Re:      Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                     as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                     -----------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December
31, 2002 of Everest  Reinsurance  Holdings,  Inc., a company organized under the
laws of  Delaware  (the  "Company"),  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned  hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted by section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ JOSEPH V. TARANTO
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Joseph V. Taranto
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                                            /s/ STEPHEN L. LIMAURO
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stephen L. Limauro
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVIT BAGHDASARYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-71851

Agency No. A079-569-313

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 17, 2011

Pasadena, California

Before: GOODWIN, KLEINFELD, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Davit Baghdasaryan, a citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of an order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals denying his application for asylum. He asserts

that the immigration judge’s (IJ) adverse credibility determination rendered at his

FILED

FEB 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2004 hearing was caused in large part by the ineffective assistance of his retained

counsel.

The record on its face amply demonstrates ineffective performance by

Baghdasaryan’s counsel, Gloria Weil-Herrera. See Castillo-Perez v. INS, 212 F.3d

518, 525 (9th Cir. 2000). Corroborating evidence in the form of medical and other

records was available before the hearing, yet Weil-Herrera failed to introduce it.

The absence of corroboration was a key factor in the agency’s failure to credit

petitioner’s testimony. Because ineffective assistance by counsel may have

changed the outcome at the merits hearing, petitioner was denied due process. See

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 793-94 (9th Cir. 2005); Lara-Torres v.

Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Cir. 2004), as amended, 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.

2005). 

We grant the petition and remand for a new hearing and, therefore, do not

reach the issue of credibility.

PETITION GRANTED AND CAUSE REMANDED.
##### 



Corporation
 Secretary of State




---



##### 



RSC HOLDINGS INC.By:
    /s/ Erik OlssonName:
    Erik OlssonTitle:
    President & Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



FIRST Name. Corporation
 SECOND Registered Office.
 THIRD Purpose.
 FOURTH Stock Reclassification. Effective Time Prior Common Stock
 FIFTH Capital Stock. a Common Stock b Preferred Stock
 Common Stock i ii iii




---



##### 



Preferred Stock


SIXTH Management of Corporation.


provided






---



##### 








---



##### 



provided
 SEVENTH Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Sponsors
 EIGHTH Special Meetings.
 NINTH Business Opportunities.




---



##### 



TENTH Section 203 of the General Corporation Law.
 ELEVENTH Amendment. provided, provided further
**EXHIBIT23**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statements Nos. 333-136473, 333-128923, 333-115840, 333-110264, 333-44954, 333-92629, 333-92631,333-57331, 333-32911 and 333-08863 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 1, 2007,relating to the consolidated financial statements of FEI Company (which reportsinclude an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of FinancialAccounting Standards Board No. 123R, Share Based Payment) and management’sreport on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FEI Company for the year endedDecember 31, 2006.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPMarch 1, 2007

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3263

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern

v. * District of Iowa.

*

Oladipo Olusegun Smith, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 11, 2000

Filed: January 20, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Oladipo Olusegun Smith appeals his drug-related convictions. Smith contends

the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdicts. Contrary to Smith's view, the

record contains substantial evidence on which a jury could have found Smith guilty of

all charges. We also conclude that an extended discussion would serve no useful

purpose in this fact-intensive case. Having found Smith's contention to be without

merit, we affirm his convictions. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:           August 13, 2010
/s/  Zhiguang ZhangBy:  Zhiguang ZhangIts:  Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MAURICE FERRELL,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 2:09-CV-11122

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

PATRICIA CARUSO,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS DUPLICATIVE AND DIRECTING THAT

THE FILING FEE AND PLEADINGS BE RE-FILED IN CASE NO. 09-CV-11103

This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Maurice Ferrell (“Petitioner”), a

state prisoner presently confined at the Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility in

Ionia, Michigan, challenges his convictions for felony murder, assault with intent to rob,

and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony which were imposed by

the Wayne County Circuit Court. Petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment without

the possibility of parole on the murder conviction, a concurrent term of five to ten years

imprisonment on the assault conviction, and a consecutive term of two years

imprisonment on the felony firearm conviction in 2002.

Petitioner, however, has already filed a habeas action challenging the same

convictions and raising the same claims, which is currently pending before another

judge in this district. See Ferrell v. Caruso, Case No. 09-CV-11103. As such, the 

instant action must be dismissed as duplicative. See e.g., Harrington v. Stegall, 2002

WL 373113, *2 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 28, 2002); Davis v. United States Parole Comm’n, 870

2:09-cv-11122-AC-MJH Doc # 2 Filed 04/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 192
1

The Court notes that the duplicative filing may have been inadvertent as it is

possible that Petitioner’s materials became separated during the intake process.

2

F.2d 657, 1989 WL 25837, *1 (6th Cir. March 7, 1989) (district court may dismiss a

habeas petition as duplicative of a pending habeas petition when the second petition is

essentially the same as the first petition).

Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.1

 This dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE

as to the petition filed in Case No. 09-CV-11103. The Court further directs that the filing

fee and the pleadings submitted in the present case be re-filed in Case No. 09-CV11103. This case is CLOSED.

SO ORDERED.

 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 2, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Maurice Ferrell 

413732, Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, 1728 Bluewater Highway, Ionia, MI

48846 and the attorneys of record on this date, April 2, 2009, by electronic and/or

ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-11122-AC-MJH Doc # 2 Filed 04/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 193
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4091

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to establish, for purposes

of disability determinations under such title, a uniform minimum level

of earnings, for demonstrating ability to engage in substantial gainful

activity, at the level currently applicable solely to blind individuals.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1996

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to establish,

for purposes of disability determinations under such title,

a uniform minimum level of earnings, for demonstrating

ability to engage in substantial gainful activity, at the

level currently applicable solely to blind individuals.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. UNIFORM MINIMUM LEVEL OF EARNINGS FOR

4 DEMONSTRATING ABILITY TO ENGAGE IN

5 SUBSTANTIAL GAINFUL ACTIVITY.

6 Section 223(d)(4) of the Social Security Act (42

7 U.S.C. 423(d)(4)) is amended, in the second sentence, by
2

•HR 4091 IH

1 striking ‘‘No individual who is blind shall be regarded’’

2 and inserting ‘‘No individual shall be regarded’’.

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply to

5 monthly insurance benefits for months after December

6 1996.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE Case No. 09-cv-13201 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM EMPLOYEES’ 

RETIREMENT SYSTEM, ET AL, Hon. Stephen J. Murphy, III 

Plaintiffs, 

 

v. 

COMERICA BANK, 

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, 

v. 

MUNDER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, 

Third-Party Defendant. 

INDEX OF EXHIBITS 

Exhibit A- Declaration of Jennifer Keough re Notice Dissemination 

Exhibit B- NERA Report 

Exhibit C- Declaration of Peter A. Binkow 

Exhibit D- Declaration of E. Powell Miller 

Exhibit E- Declaration of Stephen R. Astley 

Exhibit F- Declaration of Gerard J. Andree 

Exhibit G- Declaration of Matthew M. Guiney 

2:09-cv-13201-SJM-MJH Doc # 135-1 Filed 11/14/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 3346