alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46614-46615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13140-000]

Tidewalker Associates; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications 
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and 
Competing Applications

August 5, 2008.
    On March 11, 2008, Tidewalker Associates each filed an application, 
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study 
the feasibility of the Quoddy Roads Project, to be located on Lubec 
Narrows in Washington County, Maine.
    The proposed Quoddy Roads Project consists of: (1) 179 proposed 210

[[Page 46615]]

kilowatt sea-current generating units having a total installed capacity 
of 37.95 megawatts, (2) a proposed transmission line, and (3) 
appurtenant facilities. The Tidewalker Associates, project would have 
an average annual generation of 82.34 gigawatt-hours and be sold to a 
local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Norman Laberge, Tidewalker Associates, 46 
Place Cove Road, Trescott, ME, phone (207) 733-5513.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, (202) 502-6062.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing 
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file 
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. 
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing 
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site 
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically, 
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight 
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For 
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to 
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or 
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13140) in the docket number field to access the document. For 
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18463 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re: Refrigerant Compressors

Antitrust Litigation

/

Case No. 2:09-md-02042

Hon. Sean F. Cox

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Carl H. von Ende of the law firm of Miller, Canfield, 

Paddock and Stone, P.L.C., has this day entered an appearance as attorney of record for Plaintiff, 

General Electric Company, in the above entitled cause.

Respectfully submitted,

MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C.

By: /s/ Carl H. von Ende

Carl H. von Ende (P21867)

Kimberly L. Scott (P69706)

Suite 2500

150 West Jefferson

Floor 24

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Telephone: (313) 496-7618

Facsimile: (313) 496-8454

vonende@millercanfield.com

scott@millercanfield.com

David M. Schnorrenberg (D.C. Bar No. 458774)

CROWELL & MORING LLP

1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

Telephone: (202) 624-2500

Facsimile: (202) 628-5116

dschnorrenberg@crowell.com

Dated: June 19, 2013 Attorneys for Plaintiff General Electric Company

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 377 Filed 06/20/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 8660
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 20, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the 

Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will serve the Notice of Appearance on all 

counsel of record.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Carl H. von Ende

Carl H. von Ende (P21867)

Kimberly L. Scott (P69706)

Suite 2500

150 West Jefferson

Floor 24

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Telephone: (313) 496-7618

Facsimile: (313) 496-8454

vonende@millercanfield.com

scott@millercanfield.com

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 377 Filed 06/20/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 8661
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Criminal Nos. 09-20025, 09-20295

Plaintiff,

v

SAMUEL RIDDLE, JR., 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER AMENDING BOND CONDITIONS

At a hearing held on December 23, 2009 the Court added the following additional

bond conditions:

1) Defendant shall have no contact with Mary Waters in any way, direct, e-mail, or 

indirect through third parties.

2) Defendant shall have a curfew imposed daily from 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

3) Defendant shall reside with his mother in Flint and not enter Wayne County. 

4) Defendant shall not consume any alcohol and controlled substances. He may take 

medicines prescribed by a physician for his heart condition. 

5) Defendant shall report on a daily basis to the Pretrial Services Offices in Flint

and undergo drug and alcohol testing on a daily basis.

6) Defendant shall not be in possession of any firearms, nor in a place where

firearms are located. 

7) Defendant shall seek prior approval from Pretrial Services if he needs to enter

Wayne County to see a physician. 

8) Defendant shall undergo mental health treatment, and thereafter any mental health

2:09-cr-20025-MOB-MAR Doc # 95 Filed 12/23/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 401
treatment recommended by Pretrial Services.

SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 23, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

December 23, 2009.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:09-cr-20025-MOB-MAR Doc # 95 Filed 12/23/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 402
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFLM Minerals Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, George Heard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

Dated this 11thday of October, 2007.

GEORGE HEARDGeorge HeardChief Executive Officer





















---
|   |                                            |                                                                                                                        |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Date:  August   , 2011 | By:   /s/   Bruce A. Shear__________                                                               |   |
|   |                                            |                 Bruce A. Shear, President   |   |
|   |                                            |                 and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                            |                                                                                                                        |   |
|   | Date:  August   , 2011 | By:   /s/   Paula C. Wurts__________                                                               |   |
|   |                                            |                 Paula C. Wurts,             |   |
|   |                                            |                 Chief Financial Officer     |   |
7067397.1 30711/130955

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ROBERT D. GORDON, RECEIVER OF 

THE ESTATE OF GREGORY N. 

McKNIGHT, LEGISI MARKETING INC., 

AND LEGISI HOLDINGS, L.L.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

ELITE CONSULTING GROUP L.L.C., a 

Florida limited liability company, IVAN 

MONSALVE aka IVAN MONSALVES, 

MARSHA FRIEDMAN, KAREN L. 

REDMAN, TRICIA WITHERSPOON, 

JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, and EDGETECH 

INTERNATIONAL INC., a Nevada 

corporation, 

 Defendants. 

 ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 09-CV-10772 

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

Charles E. Murphy (P28909) 

Edward J. Hood (P42953) 

Eric K. Shih (P71326) 

CLARK HILL PLC 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Robert Gordon 

151 S. Old Woodward Avenue, Suit 200 

Birmingham, MI 48009 

(248) 989-5879 

cmurphy@clarkhill.com 

 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT MARSHA FRIEDMAN

 

 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant 

Marsha Friedman. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion, and the Court being otherwise fully 

advised in the premises, 

Case 2:09-cv-10772-GCS-VMM ECF No. 68 filed 05/26/11 PageID.1268 Page 1 of 2
7067397.1 30711/130955

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant 

Marsha Friedman is granted. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: May 26, 2011 

 Proof of Service 

 I certify that a copy of this order was served upon 

 the parties/attorneys of record by electronic or 

 regular mail on the above date. 

 s/Marcia Beauchemin 

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:09-cv-10772-GCS-VMM ECF No. 68 filed 05/26/11 PageID.1269 Page 2 of 2
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY L. WILSON,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-12939

v. HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

HUGH WOLFENBARGER,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

AMENDED

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. District

Courthouse, City of Detroit, County of Wayne,

State of Michigan on September 4, 2009

PRESENT: HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. 

Petitioner has filed his habeas petition, but Respondent has not yet filed an answer to the

petition or the state court record. Those materials are due on February 2, 2010.

Petitioner has no absolute right to be represented by counsel on federal habeas

corpus review. See Abdur-Rahman v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections, 65 F.3d 489, 492

(6th Cir. 1995). “‘[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is . . . a matter within the

discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.’” Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d

2:09-cv-12939-PJD-DAS Doc # 9 Filed 09/04/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 43
2

1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (quoting United States v. Madden, 352 F.2d 792, 793 (9th Cir.

1965)). As noted, Petitioner has submitted his petition in support of his claims, and

Respondent has not yet filed an answer to the petition. Neither an evidentiary hearing nor

discovery are necessary at this time, and the interests of justice do not require

appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254, Rules

6(a) and 8(c).

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. 

The Court will bear in mind Petitioner's request if, upon further review of the pleadings,

the Court determines that appointment of counsel is necessary. Petitioner need not file an

additional motion concerning this issue.

SO ORDERED.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: September 4, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on September 4, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.(Terry Wilson, #137914, C/O

Adrian Green & Carolynn Wilson, Supervisors, 1025 N. Perry St. Pontiac, MI 48340)

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12939-PJD-DAS Doc # 9 Filed 09/04/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 44
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Vitup Health Care Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), I, Feng Gu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  August 14, 2009 /s/Feng Gu     Chief Executive Officer
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3914

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel BEACON.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 29, 1996

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

BEACON.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106

6 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap8 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise
2

•HR 3914 IH

1 trade for the vessel BEACON (United States official num2 ber 501539).

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     I, Charles A. Lingenfelter, Chief Executive Officer of the Industrial Distribution Group, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.Dated: March 14, 2007       /s/ Charles A. Lingenfelter Charles A. Lingenfelter    President and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GUSTAVO VALENCIA, 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00165-CR

Appeal from the

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D05521)

O R D E R

The Court has received and filed the supplemental clerk’s record requested in this Court’s 

order issued November 30, 2016. The appeal is therefore reinstated, and the Reporter’s Record 

shall be due in this office on or before February 16, 2017. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Case 2:09-cv-13373-NGE-VMM   Document 2    Filed 08/26/09   Page 1 of 5

Case 2:09-cv-13373-NGE-VMM   Document 2    Filed 08/26/09   Page 2 of 5

Case 2:09-cv-13373-NGE-VMM   Document 2    Filed 08/26/09   Page 3 of 5

Case 2:09-cv-13373-NGE-VMM   Document 2    Filed 08/26/09   Page 4 of 5

Case 2:09-cv-13373-NGE-VMM   Document 2    Filed 08/26/09   Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Northern
Empire Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Cocks
------------------
    Jeffrey Cocks
    President/CFO


Date  August 5, 2009
      --------------


<PAGE>
#### John Gilbert SKAGGS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Beverly Ann SKAGGS, Respondent.

No. 70454.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 28, 1997.

R. Scott Harness, Crystal City, for petitioner-appellant.

David P. Senkel, Hillsboro, for respondent.

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

John Gilbert Skaggs (“Husband”) appeals from the dismissal of his motion to modify a prior decree of legal separation. We dismiss the appeal.

In June 1994, Husband and Beverly Ann Skaggs (“Wife”) entered into a separation agreement which was incorporated into a Decree of Legal Separation. In June of the following year, Husband filed a motion to modify and convert the Decree of Separation into a Decree of Dissolution. Wife made a special appearance to contest the sufficiency of the allegations in the motion and the service of process. The trial court dismissed the motion without prejudice.

Although not addressed by either party, we must consider, *sua sponte,*issues which determine whether this court has jurisdiction to consider Husband’s appeal. *White v. Pruneau,*913 S.W.2d 959 (Mo.App. E.D.1996). Here, the trial court specifically dismissed Husband’s motion “without prejudice.” The general rule is that a dismissal without prejudice is not a final judgment. *Id.; Waltrip v. Davis,*899 S.W.2d 147, 148 (Mo.App. E.D.1995). An appeal from such a dismissal is proper only if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the form in which it is cast or in the plaintiffs chosen forum. *Fitzpatrick v. Hannibal Re*
      *303
      *gional Hosp.,*922 S.W.2d 840, 842 (Mo.App. E.D.1996).

We find no such effect here and therefore dismiss the appeal.

REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,835
<SECURITIES>                                     4,004
<RECEIVABLES>                                      131
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     37,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,895
<PP&E>                                          12,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,173)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,829
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,067
<SALES>                                        138,056
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,056
<CGS>                                           86,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,360
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,992
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,992
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Caption altered to conform with FAS 128 financial statement presentation.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J AMAL A. MILLER , A ppellant , v. Case No. 5D 23
- 296 LT Case No. 16
- 2016
- CF

- 08450
- A STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/ Decision filed February 21, 2023 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County , M ark Borello, Judge. Jama l A. Miller, Br istol, pro s e. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.
LAMBERT, C.J

. , EVANDER an d HARRIS , JJ. , concur
.