alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANCIS A. SHARRAK,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-20272

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION

On January 11, 2011, the court ordered a psychiatric or psychological

examination of Defendant Francis A. Sharrak’s competency to proceed pro se, pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 4241. The court is now in receipt of a letter from the Warden of the

Metropolitan Correctional Center in Chicago, Illinois, where Defendant has been

transferred for examination, requesting additional time to complete the evaluation. The

letter requests an extension of fifteen days pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(b). The court

is satisfied that there is good cause to grant additional time for examination and

evaluation. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the time for psychological examination is EXTENDED for

fifteen days, and Defendant Francis A. Sharrak shall remain committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for such period pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(b).

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 127 Filed 02/11/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3751
Dated: February 11, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, February 11, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\09-20272.SHARRAK.Extend.Evaluation.nkt.wpd

2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 127 Filed 02/11/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3752
#### Dwight COFER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70692.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 28, 1997.

Douglas R. Hoff, St. Louis, for movant/ap-pellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jacqueline K. Hamra, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*296
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARK S. KAHN, as Trustee of the MARK 

S. KAHN SECOND AMENDED AND 

RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT u/a/d 

DECEMBER 18, 1996 and KAHN FAMILY, 

L.L.C., Michigan limited liability company, Case No: 2:08-CV-14417 

Hon. George Caram Steeh 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

GARY RAN, an individual, TIM REAL 

ESTATE MEZZANINE FUND I, LLC, a 

Michigan limited liability company, TIM 

REAL ESTATE MEZZANINE ADVISORS, LLC, 

a Michigan limited liability company, TELEMUS 

CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, TELEMUS INVESTMENT 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited 

liability company, 

Defendants. 

STIPULATED ORDER RESTRICTING SUBPOENA AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

Plaintiffs having issued a subpoena to Comerica Bank dated September 8, 2009 (the 

“Subpoena”), non-parties Graham Orley and Joseph Orley (“the Orleys”) and 26 Shelby No. 2 

LLC (collectively, the “Objectors”) having filed a motion on October 1, 2009 for Protective 

Order or to Modify the Subpoena, and Plaintiffs and Objectors, as evidenced by their signatures 

attached hereto, having agreed to limit the scope of the Subpoena as described herein, the Court 

hereby enters this Protective Order (“Protective Order”) modifying the Subpoena and forbidding 

inquiry into certain matters as provided herein. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scope of the Subpoena is limited to records and 

statements of the corporate entities identified in the Subpoena and shall not require production 

2:08-cv-14417-GCS-MJH Doc # 35 Filed 10/16/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 365
2

of, and no deponent shall produce or otherwise disclose, any document that contains financial 

information regarding the Orleys, O Grand VIII Limited Partnership or O Grand X Limited 

Partnership, including but not limited to loan applications, financial statements, guarantees and 

other documents evidencing the Orleys’ personal financial worth. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 14, 2009 

 s/George Caram Steeh 

 GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on 

October 14, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk 

Approved as to form: 

 

s/ Michael P. Herzoff s/Karen H. Safran 

JACOB & WEINGARTEN, P.C. CARSON FISCHER, P.L.C. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Objectors 

2301 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 777 4111 Andover Road, West Second Floor 

Troy, Michigan 48084 Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48302 

(248) 649-1900 (248) 644-4840 

michael@jacobweingarten.com ksafran@carsonfischer.com. 

2:08-cv-14417-GCS-MJH Doc # 35 Filed 10/16/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 366
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3952 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3952

 To clarify that certain components of certain scientific instruments 
          and apparatus shall be provided duty-free treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. Walker (for himself, Mr. Brown of California, Mr. Sensenbrenner, 
      Mr. Boehlert, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Rohrabacher, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Baker of 
  California, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Stockman, Mr. 
 Gutknecht, Mr. Largent, Mrs. Seastrand, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. 
   McHale, and Mr. Gordon) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify that certain components of certain scientific instruments 
          and apparatus shall be provided duty-free treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUTY FREE TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN COMPONENTS OF SCIENTIFIC 
              INSTRUMENTS AND APPARTUS.

    U.S. Note 6 of subchapter X of chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended in subdivision (a) be adding 
at the end the following new sentence: ``The term `instruments and 
apparatus' under subheading 9810.00.60 includes separable components of 
an instrument or apparatus listed in this subdivision that are imported 
for assembly in the United States in such instrument or apparatus in a 
case in which the instrument or apparatus, due to its size and 
complexity, cannot be imported in its assembled state.''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS OF REGULATIONS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall make such modifications to 
regulations as are necessary to carry out section 1.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

Certifications of CEO and CFO Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as Adopted Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Samsonite Corporation (the "Company") for the annual period ended January 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Luc Van Nevel, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Richard H. Wiley, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|By |  | /s/LUC VAN NEVEL    | 
|-- |  | ------------------- | 
|   |  | Name:               | 
|   |  | Title:              | 
|   |  | Date:               | 
|By |  | /s/RICHARD H. WILEY | 
|   |  | Name:               | 
|   |  | Title:              | 
|   |  | Date:               | 



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

65 CADILLAC SQUARE JPMC 2006-CIBC14

REO LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-13299

DTWR, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING

The court has been informed that the parties anticipate an amicable resolution to

this matter and that a stipulated order of dismissal will be presented within the next few

days. Further court involvement appears unnecessary. In accordance with counsel’s

representations, 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is CLOSED for statistical purposes. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that nothing in this order shall be deemed to

adversely affect or in any way impact the parties’ rights, and that no previously ordered

deadlines are affected hereby.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event that no final dismissal order is

presented to the court for entry before 3:00 p.m. on Friday, February 3, 2012, this case

shall be reinstated to the court’s active docket at that time, and the litigation will proceed

2:09-cv-13299-RHC-VMM Doc # 70 Filed 01/30/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1708
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-13299.65CADILLACSQUARE.AdminClosing.wpd

2

as if the case had never been closed. In such event, the court anticipates that all

outstanding replies must be filed by the end of the day on February 3, 2012.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 30, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, January 30, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-13299-RHC-VMM Doc # 70 Filed 01/30/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1709
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131084 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. 

### TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Stephen J. Markman, 

### as Subrogee of ROBERT WELLS, JR., Justices 

### Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 131084 COA: 257275 Oakland CC: 2004-056548-CZ NORTH POINTE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
VICTOR ROSS, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

2011-7025

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 09-963, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________

M ATTHEW J. D OWD , Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the claimant-appellant. With him on the brief were R OBERT J. S CHEFFEL and A DRIENNE J OHNSON

.

R ENEE A. G ERBER , Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department ofJustice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondentappellee. With her on the brief were T ONY W EST , Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON , Director, and K IRK T. M ANHARDT , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was J ONATHAN T AYLOR , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L INN , D YK , and P ROST , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

 SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 09-11835

TRUSTEE OF THE ROOFERS LOCAL 149 SECURITY BENEFIT TRUST FUND, ET.AL

Plaintiff(s),

-vROOFCON, INC., ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said court, held in the

 United States Courthouse, in the City of

 Detroit, State of Michigan, on August 21, 2009.

 

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court having issued an Order to Show Cause for lack of progress and the 

Plaintiff having Filed a Motion for Entry of Default , therefore;

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause as to

why this case should not be dismissed for lack of progress be and the same is hereby SET

ASIDE.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: August 21, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on August 21, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-11835-PJD-DAS Doc # 11 Filed 08/21/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 97
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No’s. 333-05873, 033-76120, 333-05959, 033-76122, 333-05957, 333-18935,333-18883, 333-18885, 333-30841, 333-30211, 333-31901, 333-31895, 333-43757,333-60365, 333-91995, 333-84751, 333-40914, 333-48116, 333–60862, 333-116421and 333-116423 on Forms S-8 and Registration Statement No’s. 033-94532,333-09109, 333-50775, 333-50777 and 333-53351 on Forms S-3 of our reportsdated February 24, 2006, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Spherion Corporation, and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Spherion Corporation for the year ended January 1, 2006.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

February 24, 2006

 

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3941

To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 Pearl Street in

New York City, New York, as the ‘‘Ted Weiss United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1996

Mr. NADLER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 500

Pearl Street in New York City, New York, as the ‘‘Ted

Weiss United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds the following:

5 (1) Ted Weiss represented the 17th Congres6 sional District of New York, serving in the House of

7 Representatives from January 1977 until his death

8 on September 14, 1992. During that time, he pro9 vided exemplary service to the people of his district

10 and to the people of the United States.
2

•HR 3941 IH

1 (2) Having been born on September 17, 1927,

2 in Hungary, and having come to the United States

3 with his mother and sister in 1938 on the very day

4 Hitler marched into Czechoslovakia, Ted Weiss be5 came an ardent champion for human rights, which

6 were denied to many of those who remained behind.

7 (3) After emigrating to the United States, Ted

8 Weiss served in the United States Army. He later

9 earned a bachelor’s degree and a law degree from

10 Syracuse University and, subsequently, served in the

11 City Council of New York City from 1961 until

12 1976, when he was elected to the House of Rep13 resentatives.

14 (4) Ted Weiss was among the first to focus the

15 Nation’s attention on the need to increase funding

16 for AIDS research, before the word ‘‘epidemic’’

17 dominated these discussions.

18 (5) Ted Weiss urged the use of Federal funds

19 to address the devastating impact of homelessness

20 on communities across the Nation.

21 (6) As Chairman of the Congressional Arts

22 Caucus, Ted Weiss emphasized the role of both

23 major arts and cultural institutions and community24 based arts programs.
3

•HR 3941 IH

1 (7) The congressional legislative agenda of Ted

2 Weiss reflected, in addition to his vigilant support

3 for human rights, his commitment to peace and his

4 quest to ensure fairness and justice for all.

5 SEC.2. DESIGNATION.

6 The Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in

7 New York City, New York, shall be known and designated

8 as the ‘‘Ted Weiss United States Courthouse’’.

9 SEC. 3. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

12 States courthouse referred to in section 2 shall be deemed

13 to be a reference to the ‘‘Ted Weiss United States Court14 house’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,667,620
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,464,338
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 97,721,012
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      37,110,889
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        36,445,749
<LOANS>                                    234,086,432
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,452,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             406,221,564
<DEPOSITS>                                 367,187,558
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,167,909
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        136
<COMMON>                                        26,562
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,837,399
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             406,221,564
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             19,982,224
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            9,773,796
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            29,756,020
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          13,576,177
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,307,978
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       15,448,042
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,129,660
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           (692,419)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             14,588,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,563,429
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     960,729
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   960,729
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.82
<LOANS-NON>                                    521,456
<LOANS-PAST>                                    87,230
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                67,521
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,966,842
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,061,631
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,433,160
<RECOVERIES>                                   306,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,452,131
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,452,131
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,015,216


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3980 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3980

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 relating to the exclusion from the United States of certain 
                                aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1996

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 relating to the exclusion from the United States of certain 
                                aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 401(a)(4) 
of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 
(22 U.S.C. 6091(a)(4)) is amended by striking ``a spouse, minor child, 
or agent'' and inserting ``an agent''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Diane MELCHING, Claimant/Appellant, v. SUNLINE BRANDS, Employer/Respondent, and Federal Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 70662.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Feb. 18, 1997.

Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for appellant.

Betsy J. Levitt, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondents Sunline Brands and Federal Ins. Co.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Woodie J. Curtis, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.

Before CRANE, P.J., and GERALD M. SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commis*663sion affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
#### Dwayne HARDEMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 031-94.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

Feb. 1, 1995.

David A. Schulman, Austin, for appellant.

Ronald Earle, Dist. Atty., Lisa Dotin Stewart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Robert Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for State.

*OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

MANSFIELD, Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of aggravated assault. The trial court assessed punishment at five years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. The Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction. *Hardeman v. State,*868 S.W.2d 404 (Tex.App.—Austin 1993).

After careful review of the petition for discretionary review and the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we have determined that appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted.

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON, J., dissents.

KELLER, J., not participating.