alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - [OMB Number: 3206-0193] 

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for clearance of a revised information collection. OPM Online Form 1417, the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) Information System form, collects information from the 247 local CFC campaigns to verify campaign results and collect contact information. Revisions to the form include clarifying edits to items numbered 2-6, 9 and 10 of the Campaign Results Total Page, the elimination of questions numbered 13-15 of the Campaign Results Total Page and the return of one question edited to collect pledge amounts designated specifically for federal emergency or disaster relief, if any, on the Campaign Results Total Page. 

We estimate 247 online OPM Forms 1417 are completed annually. Each form takes approximately 20 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 82.3 hours. 

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Margaret A. Miller at (202) 606-2699 or FAX (202) 418-3251 or e-mail                         *mamiller@opm.gov.*                         Please be sure to include a mailing address with your request.                     

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication. 

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—

Cherlynn Stevens, 

Office of the Combined Federal Campaign, 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 

1900 E Street, NW., Room 5450, 

Washington, DC 20415. 

Brenda Aguilar, 

OPM Desk Officer, 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 

OIRA, 

Office of Management and Budget, 

NEOB, NW., 

Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503. 

 Howard Weizman, 

Deputy Director.

 [FR Doc. E8-18446 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325-46-P
Exhibit 3.2(1)

[GRAPHIC OMITTED]  DEAN HELLER                         Certificate of
                   Secretary of State                    Amendment
                   202 North Carson Street           (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 and
                   Carson City, Nevada 89701-4201     78,390)
                   (775)684 5708


           important: Read attached instructions before completing

              Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
              -----------------------------------------------------
                         For Nevada Profit Corporations
                         ------------------------------
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)
                             - Remit in Duplicate -





1. Name of corporation:  Capitol Communities Corporation



2. The  articles  have been  amended as follows  (provide  article  numbers,  if
available):
   ARTICLE I Name:  The name of the corporation is:  Capitol First Corporation













3.  The  vote by  which  the  stockholders  holding  shares  in the  corporation
entitling  them to  exercise at least a majority  of the voting  power,  or such
greater  proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 64 percent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


4. Officer Signature


   --------------------
   aSHLEY bLOOM

                           " If any proposed amendment would alter or change any
                           preference  or any  relative  or other right given to
                           any class or series of outstanding  shares,  then the
                           amendment  must be approved by the vote,  in addition
                           to the
affirmative  vote otherwise  required,  of the holders of shares  representing a
majority of the voting power of each class or series  affected by the  amendment
regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT:  Failure to include any of the above information and remit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
#### Craig GOGGIN, Petitioner/Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, State of Missouri, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 65450.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 19, 1994.

Timothy J. Farrell, Burlison & Farrell, O’Fallon, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

The Director of Revenue (Director) appeals the trial court’s reversal of her revocation of petitioner’s driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical test. We reverse and remand.

Petitioner was arrested for driving while intoxicated on October 4,1992. The Director revoked petitioner’s driver’s license for refusing to submit to a chemical test.

The Director mailed a notice of revocation to petitioner on November 20, 1992. On April 2, 1993, petitioner filed a petition for review in the trial court. On May 11, 1993, the Director filed a motion to dismiss, contending the court below lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to petitioner’s failure to timely file for review. The motion was not heard and, on November 29, 1993, the cause was confessed by the prosecuting attorney. On November 30, 1993, the court entered an order reinstating petitioner’s driving privileges.

Petitions for review must be filed within thirty days of mailing of the notice of revocation. § 536.110, RSMo 1986; *Ramey v. Director of Revenue,*865 S.W.2d 442, 443 (Mo. App.E.D.1993). Failure to do so deprives the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction. *Ramey,*865 S.W.2d at 443. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived or agreed to. *Pool v. Director of Revenue,*824 S.W.2d 515, 517 (Mo.App.1992). A confession of judgment does not vest a court with subject matter jurisdiction which is otherwise lacking. *Evans v. Director of Revenue,*871 S.W.2d 90, 92 (MoApp.E.D.1994). When a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it can take no action other than to exercise its inherent power to dismiss. *Pool,*824 S.W.2d at 517.

Here, the notice of revocation was mailed on November 20, 1992. The petition was filed on April 2, 1993 and, therefore, was untimely.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.

GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 157 (Wednesday, August 13, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47195-47196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the

[[Page 47196]]

provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Inherited Disease Research Access 
Committee.
    Date: September 5, 2008.
    Time: 4:15 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 
4076, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Rudy Pozzatti, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20852, (301) 
402-0838, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d6d7267677c69696f5d707c747133737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4c4dbceced5c0c0c6f4d9d5ddd89adadddc9ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93172, Human 
Genome Research--National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 5, 2008.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-18503 Filed 8-12-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### FIRST NAT. BANK OF RUSTON v. JONES et al.

No. 5036.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

May 14, 1935.

Scarborough & Barham, of Ruston, for- appellants.

Elder & Elder, of Ruston, for appellee.

*55MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action upon a promissory note for $1,854, with interest and attorney’s fees, coupled with a demand for the cancellation and annulment as a simulation of an alleged pretended sale to his daughters of property valued at $5,000.

From a judgment for plaintiff as prayed for, defendants appealed to this court.

 Here defendants’ motion to transfer the appeal to the Supreme Court, because the amount involved exceeds our jurisdiction, is joined and acquiesced in by plaintiff. Because-of this acquiescence and because in cases'of. simulation the value of the property involved and not the'amount of plaintiff’s claim determines jurisdiction, the motion is granted. Katz v. Gill; 43 La. Ann. 1041, 10 So. 364.

' It is accordingly ordered and decreed that this appeal be transferred to the Supreme Court to be lodged there within thirty days from date hereof. All costs of appeal to this court' to be paid by appellant.
Exhibit
32.01
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Home Buy & Sell
Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Martha Y. Jimenez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Martha Y. JimenezBy:
      Martha Y. JimenezChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:
      November 14, 2008
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO.09-12543

TRACEY L. KEVELIGHAN, ET.AL,

Plaintiff(s),

-VTROTT & TROTT, ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

 PARTIAL

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

At a session of said Court, held in the 

United States Courthouse, in the City of 

Detroit, State of Michigan, on April 5, 2010.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J.DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Due notice of an Order to Show Cause why the above case should not be

dismissed for failure to serve defendant(s) within 120 days of the filing of the complaint,

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, has

been mailed to counsel of record. The Court has received no response; therefore

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled case be, and hereby is

DISMISSED for failure to serve as to defendant HSBC Mortgage Corp.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: April 5, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on April 5, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager
#### Fred M. Dennis, Appellant, v. Stock, Grain and Provision Company of New York, Limited, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Across America Financial Services,
      Inc.
      (the Company") on Form 10 QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Brian L. Klemsz, Chief
      Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated:
      AUGUST 13, 2007


By:
/s/
      Brian L.
      Klemsz


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-12973-AC-VMM Document 1-3 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 12 of 12
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00409-CV

Robert Lee GILL, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

STATE of Texas, County of Bexar, et al.,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2002-TA1-03238

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009

DISMISSED

Appellant Robert Lee Gill Jr.’s brief was originally due on November 7, 2008. We granted

Robert Lee Gill Jr. an extension to December 8, 2008, to file his appellant’s brief. No appellant’s

brief was filed. We then notified Robert Lee Gill Jr. by written order that if his appellant’s brief was

not filed by February 9, 2009, we would dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, no

appellant’s brief has been filed. We, therefore, dismissthis appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3.

PER CURIAM
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4333

To prohibit smoking in any transportation facility for which Federal financial

assistance is provided.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To prohibit smoking in any transportation facility for which

Federal financial assistance is provided.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Smoke-Free Transpor5 tation Facilities Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING IN TRANSPORTATION

7 FACILITIES.

8 (a) SMOKING PROHIBITION.—As a condition of the

9 receipt of Federal financial assistance, the Secretary of

10 Transportation shall require that the owner or operator
2

•HR 4333 IH

1 of a transportation facility take such actions as may be

2 necessary to prohibit smoking in any indoor portion of the

3 facility that is accessible to the general public.

4 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi5 nitions apply:

6 (1) SMOKING.—The term ‘‘smoking’’ includes

7 the smoking of cigarettes, cigars, and pipes.

8 (2) TRANSPORTATION FACILITY.—The term

9 ‘‘transportation facility’’ includes any airport termi10 nal, bus terminal, subway station, and train station.

11 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall

13 issue regulations to carry out this section.

Æ
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Giovanni Borrero, Appellant

No. 06-12-00118-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 76th District Court of 

Titus County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 17,812). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Carter and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Giovanni Borrero, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 4, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0438 Lower Tribunal No. F04-16767

________________ 

### Davis Dorvil, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alberto Milian, Judge. Davis Dorvil, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Fairfax FinancialHoldings Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     The Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Greg Taylor   Greg Taylor  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Date: March 6, 2009  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FairfaxFinancial Holdings Limited and will be retained by Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HAY & WATSON
CHARTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT
                                                              September 10, 1999

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

As the  independent  auditor  for  Cryopak  Industries,  Incorporated,  I hereby
consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Form 20F  Statement  and any
amendments  thereto of my  report,  relating  to the  financial  statements  and
financial statement schedules of Cyropak Industries,  Incorporated for the years
ended Narch 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 included on Form 20F and amendments. Reports
are dated June 11, 1999 for the year ended March 31, 1998.

I further  consent  to the  incorporation  of my  review  report  and  financial
statements by reference in the Form 20F and amendments thereto. These statements
cover the period for March 31, 1999 and 1998 (report date of June 11, 1999).


                                                       /s/ Hay & Watson
                                                       ----------------
EXHIBIT 23.2







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

                               ------------------


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Everest Reinsurance Holdings,  Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-1972 and File No.
333-05771)  of  our  report  dated  February  17,  1998,  on  our  audit  of the
consolidated  financial  statements and financial statement schedules of Everest
Reinsurance  Holdings,  Inc. as of  December  31, 1997 and 1996 and for the year
then ended which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
New York, New York
March 16, 1998
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46335-46336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18182]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--the Information Technology Industry Council, 
Inc./the International Committee for Information Technology Standards

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 25, 2008, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Information Technology 
Industry Council, Inc./The InterNational Committee for Information 
Technology Industry Council, Inc. (``ITI/INCITS'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, ITI/INCITS has approved 100 new national standards in 
such areas as Biometrics, Fibre Channel, Office Processing, 
Identification Cards and OSI, initiated numerous other new standards 
development projects, and restructured several of its technical 
committees, task groups and management committees. More detail 
regarding these activities--including a catalog of current standards, 
descriptions of proposed standards under public review, and information 
concerning comment procedure and deadlines--may be found at http://www.incits.org.
    On September 21, 2004, ITI/INCITS filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section

[[Page 46336]]

6(b) of the Act on December 16, 2004 (69 FR 75346).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E8-18182 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M