alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4202

To amend section 6901 of title 31, United States Code, to provide for

certain lands taken into trust for Indian tribes to be included in the

definition of entitlement land.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To amend section 6901 of title 31, United States Code,

to provide for certain lands taken into trust for Indian

tribes to be included in the definition of entitlement

land.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 Paragraph (1) of section 6901 of title 31, United

5 States Code, is amended—
2

•HR 4202 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘means land owned by the Unit2 ed States Government—’’ and inserting in lieu

3 thereof ‘‘means—

4 ‘‘(A) land owned by the United States Gov5 ernment—’’;

6 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through

7 (G) as clauses (i) through (vii), respectively, and

8 moving such clauses (as so redesignated) 2 ems to

9 the right;

10 (3) by striking the period at the end and insert11 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’; and

12 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub13 paragraph:

14 ‘‘(B) land held in trust by the United

15 States Government for the benefit of an Indian

16 tribe (as defined in section 4 of the Indian Self

17 Determination and Education Assistance Act

18 (25 U.S.C. 450b)) which—

19 ‘‘(i) is not, or part of, an Indian res20 ervation; and

21 ‘‘(ii) is taken into trust on or after

22 January 1, 1997.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FREDERICK OPIYO,

Plaintiff, 

Case No. 09-cv-13609

v. Hon. George Caram Steeh

VIRG STRICKLER, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (#5)

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation filed October 15, 2009. Plaintiff filed an objection on January 4, 2010.

Magistrate Judge Charles Binder recommended sua sponte that all the defendants

other than Sanilac County Deputies Boehm, Darling, and Wedge be dismissed with

prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Magistrate Judge also dismissed with prejudice

each claim made against the defendants in their official capacities because the plaintiff

failed to identify a policy or custom that contributed to the constitutional deprivations alleged

in his complaint. The objection asks the court to change the Magistrate Judge’s

recommended dismissals with prejudice to dismissals without prejudice on the off chance

that facts found in discovery might support the dismissed claims. Instead of identifying

reasons to conclude that facts likely exist to support plaintiff’s claims, plaintiff simply asserts

that such facts may exist. 

Plaintiff’s objection is not well founded. The Magistrate Judge in his duties under

28 U.S.C. § 1915A, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (c)(1) correctly found that

2:09-cv-13609-GCS-CEB Doc # 11 Filed 01/20/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 171
plaintiff fails to allege specific acts or unconstitutional behavior by Deputies Brinker, Paling,

and the remaining defendants. See Copeland v. Machulis, 57 F.3d 476, 481 (6th Cir. 1995);

Kesterson v. Moritsugu, 1998 WL 3210008 at *4 (6th Cir. 1998). In addition, plaintiff’s

claims against the defendants in their official capacities fail as well because they lack a

direct causal link between a municipal policy or custom and the alleged constitutional

deprivations. See Board of County Commissioners of Bryan County, Okla. v. Brown, 520

U.S. 397, 405 (1997); City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385 (1989).

Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the

pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and the objections thereto, the Court

hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, the complaint may be served only on Defendants Broehm, Darling, and

Wedge in their individual capacities. Defendants Virg Strickler, Garry Biniecki, Sara

Brinker, William Smith, Corporal Hawk, Robert Todd Palmer, Douglas Allen Shaggena,

Aaron Hillman and Elizabeth Paling are dismissed with prejudice. Further, each claim

made against the defendants in their official capacity is dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 20, 2010

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

January 20, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-13609-GCS-CEB Doc # 11 Filed 01/20/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 172
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

OMAR J. GATES,

 

Petitioner, Case Number 2:09-CV-13864

 Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff

v.

BLAINE LAFLER,

Respondent.

____________________________________________/

JUDGMENT

The above entitled matter having come before the Court on a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus, Honorable Lawrence P. Zatkoff, United States District Court Judge, presiding, and in

accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on September 28, 2011.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Certificate of Appealability is

DENIED.

DAVID J. WEAVER 

CLERK OF THE COURT

APPROVED:

BY: S/Marie Verlinde 

MARIE VERLINDE

DEPUTY CLERK 

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 28, 2011

2:09-cv-13864-LPZ-RSW Doc # 13 Filed 09/28/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 1100
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4002

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide equitable treatment for barley producers so that 1996 contract payments to the producers are not reduced to a greater extent than the average percentage

reduction in contract payments for other commodities, while maintaining

the level of contract payments for other commodities, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. POMEROY (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. WILLIAMS,

and Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide

equitable treatment for barley producers so that 1996

contract payments to the producers are not reduced to

a greater extent than the average percentage reduction

in contract payments for other commodities, while maintaining the level of contract payments for other commodities, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4002 IH

1 SECTION 1. CORRECTION OF BARLEY PAYMENT INEQUITY.

2 Section 113 of the Agricultural Market Transition

3 Act (title I of Public Law 104–127; 7 U.S.C. 7213) is

4 amended—

5 (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as

6 subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the follow8 ing:

9 ‘‘(e) ADDITIONAL BARLEY ALLOCATION.—In addi10 tion to the adjustments required under subsection (c), the

11 amount allocated under subsection (b)(4) for barley con12 tract payments shall be increased by $35,000,000 for fis13 cal year 1996.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)  OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Vahé A. Sarkissian, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the annual report of FEI Company on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results
of operations of FEI Company.

|By:                                                      |  | /s/VAHÉ A. SARKISSIAN |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | 
|Vahé A. Sarkissian
Chief Executive Officer and President
|Date: March 10, 2005                                    

I,
Robert S. Gregg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of FEI Company
on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FEI Company.

|By:                                                                  |  | /s/ROBERT S. GREGG |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|Robert S. Gregg
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|March 10, 2005                                                      

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report ofSino Charter Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Bradley W. Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 12thday of December, 2007.

BRADLEY W. MILLERBradley W. MillerChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




















---
September 3, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 3rd day of September, 2015.

10-14-00357-CV	MARGARET CANNON v. CONNIE SPENCE - ON APPEAL FROM THE 272ND DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 13-002189-CV-272 - AFFIRMED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the judgment of the court below; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the court below be, and hereby is, affirmed.  It is further ordered that appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended, and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Report of
Acquired Sales Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Report”) I, Gerard M. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge:





a.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





b.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Gerard M.
Jacobs


Gerard M.
Jacobs, President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





Dated
February 15, 2010
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60016

No. 95-60327

(Summary Calendar)

__________________

RODRIGO MARTIN REYES,

 Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA No. A29-322-056)

- - - - - - - - - -

March 1, 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Rodrigo Martin Reyes seeks review of the decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals

denying his motions for asylum and for reopening of his asylum hearing. Reyes contends that he has

shown a well-founded fear of persecution should he return to Nicaragua and contendsthat the Board

should have reopened his asylum hearing based on evidence he submitted in conjunction with his

motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and we find the decision

denying Reyes's motion for asylum is supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v. INS, 37 F.3d

185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994). There was no abuse of discretion in denying Reyes's motion to reopen his

asylum proceedings. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992).
2

PETITION DENIED.
| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chancery Resources, Inc. for the period      ended August 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Chancery      Resources, Inc.                                                                  |

|   | /s/ Juan Restrepo Gutierrez                                         |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Juan      Restrepo Gutierrez                                        |   |
|   | Secretary,      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer               |   |
|   | (Principal      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|   | Chancery      Resources, Inc.                                       |   |

----
Order filed, September 04, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00707-CR

____________

STEVEN BERNELL PENTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 65544-A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 28, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Robin Rios, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
MSFCM L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 15, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KELLY A ELIAS, pro se, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-13527 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

PITT, McGEHEE, PALMER, RIVERS

AND GOLDEN, P.C., et al.

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING JANUARY 14, 2010 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (# 2)

AND EXTENDING TIME FOR SERVICE THROUGH FEBRUARY 16, 2010

Plaintiff Kelly Elias, appearing pro per, was ordered to show cause by February 1,

2010 why her employment discrimination claims under the federal Family Medical Leave

Act, the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, and Michigan's Persons with Disabilities

Civil Rights Act, should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff filed her

complaint on September 4, 2009. A proof of service has not been filed as to any

defendant. By Rule, service was to be accomplished by January 4, 2010. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4(m). 

Plaintiff hand-delivered a timely written response to the court on January 29, 2010,

asking the court for a 14-day extension to serve the defendants, and for additional time to

secure counsel, or for the appointment of counsel.

The court is authorized to grant Elias additional specific time to serve the

defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Given the nearly five months that have passed since

plaintiff filed her complaint, the court is not persuaded that Elias should be granted

additional time to secure counsel beyond the time extension for service. No private funds

2:09-cv-13527-GCS-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 02/02/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 25
2

exist for appointment of counsel in this civil matter. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the court's January 14, 2010 show cause order is hereby

DISMISSED, without prejudice. Plaintiff Elias's request for an extension of time to serve

the defendants is hereby GRANTED, to the extent that Elias SHALL serve the defendants

as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on or before February 16, 2010.

Plaintiff Elias SHALL also file timely proofs of service with the court indicating that service

was accomplished on or before February 16, 2010. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this

Order may result in the dismissal of her claims without prejudice. Plaintiff Elias' requests

for additional time to secure counsel or for appointment of counsel are hereby DENIED,

without prejudice. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2010

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

February 2, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-13527-GCS-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 02/02/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Case No. 09-12950

Plaintiff, Honorable David M. Lawson

v.

JOHN J. BRAVATA, RICHARD J. 

TRABULSY, ANTONIO M. BRAVATA,

BBC EQUITIES, LLC, BRAVATA 

FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC, and SHARI A. 

BRAVATA,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER ADJOURNING EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO OCTOBER 21 AND

GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE RECEIVER’S REPORT

On September 17, 2009, the Court held a phone conference with counsel for the plaintiff, the

defendants, and the receiver to set dates for an evidentiary hearing and a show cause hearing. Both

matters were originally scheduled for October 1, 2009. The Court recently was informed that the

receiver would be unable to complete its report by the due date, as required in the Court’s Order

Appointing a Receiver, and also would be unable to attend the hearing. The receiver has requested

additional time to complete the report. The Court and the parties believe that the receiver’s input

at the evidentiary hearing would be helpful. The parties have agreed that the hearing on the motion

for preliminary injunction and the receivership be postponed to October 21, 2009. The Court will

extend the time within which the receiver shall file its report to October 19, 2009. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing on the plaintiff’s motion for a

preliminary injunction and appointment of a receiver is ADJOURNED to October 21, 2009, at

1:00 p.m.

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 67 Filed 09/18/2009 Page 1 of 2
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the show cause hearing [dkt #63] will proceed as scheduled on

October 1, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.

It is further ORDERED that the deadline for filing the receiver’s report is EXTENDED to

October 19, 2009.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: September 18, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on September 18, 2009.

s/Lisa M. Ware 

LISA M. WARE

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 67 Filed 09/18/2009 Page 2 of 2
0n% with appropriatJ.ono raad@ by tha LagialatuN oub ot the State W#my IbnQ. Ho further &aprovssant of miQ aystra ahall be madewith tJii ala pi or Wltth

my 1mar9 furnishedby thr oati:;- tlsr exwopt for ,theaaquisitinn of rig:! to-of-say ahloa larg

ba turalshsd by the oauntlem, their rubUlvl8iaaanr CatineQ rodl 41rtrlota.w

We think **tha** Iewuago of this motion of t& bill clear end ~rments 80dikfoulty In InterpraUnq thr interiti0n 0r tb0 :0gmmm1, an3 unlc?oa mm? nther pravinkanof tha IQW pfovl4a8SE oxwc,ptlnnto **23rotlon** 3, it 18 2ur 0pini.m that HU furtkcsrlwprororoent sf Stat@ hlghvrsya 

### caybo nrr%e by oouat~iesp&litlan;l suhdirlalonaor road diqtrioto :)f t!;e
aa tea 4mover, SubmotSbn (8) of Sea&ion b ,fBsms Rlli 688 sentafar the f..~llorln.~ l$)n.+m,qsr

.*Xn daci ti0n $0 ana rag4rai488 of tk 0tfi0r on8 ot thla Aot, all bands voted by. a prior to Tanasry 2, 193s inrofrr us **oi 8une**  **wurm or**  may ho rsued *ridthe i proaaldo aotually expend*4 in thr am5truotlan
or read8 whlah am ,a ptt or the dnmigmtcd myatmaof Btahr bl@m?yn, uhall bs sli&bla 64 partiorl to ia the dirrributlon of the money6 ooe ng Snto said Cou~nOr an6 Rocld b?ar briOt %t&bway frond,the aQa# ha prOVidU? fW etherbondr under this,Aat end sa of the dste at the 

### adgfdi00 of 

### rrld roe4 no 4 phrt of t&t state syaturl* y *".

It is obvlour from Q rea4lng or chs Ea~agoinp arotJ~on that wo beta 6n $ICaeFt?Ofi t:, :3not!sn 3, ebovs 

### qw00, aaJ a4 to the rallditp 3f thlo seatlon, wit refer pm to bur optni?n zlu*bar 

### (r-1334,

oiWrosaitd

tothtg Rdnuxabls%!urphy

Oole, County AuUitor of Liberty County, tibarty,Trxkr. ItW-m Dur aonofu~ion thorsin that tbo **prOVisionA** at SQattbn 6, **ahflaOtiJa (A)**  of AAid btll althbugh in 0onfli4t with Ssdtlun 

### 3thQX44f, murBbe 

### oonrtru ob ~LB an **amrphlan** and shmld be petittti to nItma.
#### Charles A. Satterly, Appellant, v. Edward E. Dewick and Others, Respondents.

— Motion denied. Present — Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ'.