alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-20309 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

BRENDA STEPHENSON,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO ADMIT RULE 404(b) EVIDENCE; AND

GRANTING IN PART GOVERNMENT'S MOTION IN LIMINE

TO EXCLUDE INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE AND IMPROPER ARGUMENT

For the reasons set forth on the record at a February 1, 2010 hearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the Government's motion in limine to admit Rule 404(b)

evidence is hereby DENIED, without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government's motion in limine to exclude

inadmissible evidence and improper argument is hereby GRANTED, IN PART, as to the

exclusion of: (1) references to the criminal convictions of Government witness James

Barnes; (2) references to a juvenile adjudication and the criminal convictions of complainant

Veretta Burnett, EXCEPT as to Burnett's 2008 conviction for assault with intent to do great

bodily harm less than murder as pertinent to the instant criminal charges; (3) crossexamination of victim Burnett's alleged past drug use which is remote in time or otherwise

not relevant to the instant criminal charges; (4) evidence that complainant Burnett engaged

in prostitution or exotic dancing; (5) examination of Government witnesses regarding

2:09-cr-20309-GCS-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 02/02/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 47
2

Robert Howard's and Jim Lant's alleged bias against defendant Stevenson without first

seeking the court's approval outside the presence of the jury; (6) defense Counsel's general

examination regarding defendant Stevenson's prior interview statements with respect to the

Government's presentation of its case-in-chief; (7) reference to defendant Stephenson's

restrictive duties since the incident; and (8) reference to defendant Stephenson's potential

sentence. That part of the Government's motion to exclude reference to Government

witness Brent Wilburn's alleged comments regarding the racial composition of the Highland

Park Police Department is hereby WITHDRAWN. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 2, 2010

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

February 2, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cr-20309-GCS-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 02/02/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 48
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 465 -CR The St at e of Te xa s , A ppe lla nt

v . Dustin Doan, Ap pellee FR OM T HE C OU N T Y C OU R T A T L A W N O. 5 OF T R A V IS C OU N T Y NO. 701, 396 , HO NORAB LE NANCY WRI GHT H OH ENGARTEN , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO PI N I O N The State’s motion to dismiss its a ppeal is grante d. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). T he appea l is dism issed.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, Justice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Waldrop and H enson Dismissed on St ate’ s Motion Filed: September

26, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-13341-JAC-DAS Document 3 Filed 08/25/2009 Page 12 of 12
EXHIBIT 6
M2000/IS

P.O. Box 7459

Burbank, CA 91510

(818) 566-8300 fax (818) 566-8700

Professional services rate: $300 p/person-hour.

INVOICE

Customer

Name Pulte Homes, Inc.

Travel Time rate: $150. 00 p/person hour.

Address 100 Bloomfield Hills Parkway, Suite 300

City Bloomfield Hills State: MI ZIP 48304

Attn: Melissa Hernandez

Hours

3.0 Hrs

16.0 Hrs

3.0 Hrs

1 Date

Contact

J

Invoice No. 92909

9/29/2009

Richard Jones

Ext. 21

Sub-Total I TOTAL

Mark Alcock:

Professional Services & Travel Time

Prof. Services - Capture Forensic Image $900.00 $900.00

Prof. Services - Analyzing & Parsing Data $4,800.00 $4,800.00

Travel Time - LA to Tempe to LA $450.00 $450.00

Reimbursement

U.S. Airways $355.20 $355.20

LAX Airport Parking $30.00 $30.00

500 Gig Hard Drive $100.00 $100.00

SubTotal

Check to be made payable to: M2000/IS

Forward payment to:

M2000/IS

P.O. Box 7459

Burbank, CA 91510

TOTAL

Office Use Only

INVOICES DUE AND PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT

$6,635.20

$6,635.20

J

Federal Tax ID Number. 95-4462474
#### Joan SCHULTZ, Employee/Appellant, v. NIEMAN MARCUS, Employer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 70824.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 28, 1997.

Gary J. Sanguinet, Brown and Crouppen, P.C., St. Louis, for employee/appellant.

Charles W. Weinstock, Riethmann, Valentine and Rouse, St. Louis, for employer/respondent.

*295Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Jeffrey K. ElnicM, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the denial of her claim for workers’ compensation benefits and her claim against the Second Injury Fund by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). The decision of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5  U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Neuroscience Review  Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         November 13-14, 2008.                     

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant  applications.                     

*Place:*                         Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue,  Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism,  National Institutes of Health,  5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041,  Rockville, MD 20852,  301-443-0800,                         *bbuzas@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol  Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272,  Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273,  Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National  Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 31 2008. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

 [FR Doc. E8-18254 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1109

EKANEM UFIA EKANEM,

 Petitioner,

 versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A79-745-883)

Submitted: May 25, 2005 Decided: July 5, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ekanem Ufia Ekanem, Petitioner Pro Se. Daniel Eric Goldman, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ekanem Ufia Ekanem, a native and citizen of Nigeria,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (Board). The order denied his motion to reopen the Board’s

summary dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s order

denying relief from removal. We have reviewed the record and the

Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s denial

of the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.1(d)(2)(i)(E);

1003.2(a)(2005). In addition, we deny Ekanem’s pending motion for

a stay of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(2) (2000). 

Accordingly, though we grant Ekanem’s motion to proceed

on appeal in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

EVERSON R. FRANCIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-13455

HERITAGE GLEN TOWNHOUSE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE

Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s third motion to reopen this case. On

December 30, 2009, the court denied Plaintiff’s first two motions to reopen because

they were filed after Plaintiff filed notices of appeal and the court therefore lacked

jurisdiction. This motion has likewise been filed after Plaintiff filed notices of appeal,

and the court thus lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion to Reinstate Case and Consider the

Truth” [Dkt. # 43] is DENIED. 

 

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 2, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, February 2, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa G. Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-13455-RHC-VMM Doc # 44 Filed 02/02/10 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 243
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-12129 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

BERNADETTE STONE, MICHAEL LEWIS,

JAN BIGELOW, and TRACIE SHAW,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING

On even date, this Court entered an Order staying these proceedings pending

plaintiff David Scott's payment of costs imposed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(d) on or before

December 14, 2009.

This case is hereby ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. This case may be reopened

on or before December 14, 2009 by motion of any party on demonstrating that plaintiff

Scott has paid the costs imposed under Rule 41(d) as ordered. This matter may be

reopened by the court on or after December 15, 2009 to dismiss plaintiff Scott's claims for

failure to comply with the court's order of even date imposing costs. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 14, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-12129-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 09/14/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 93
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 14, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-12129-RSW Doc # 22 Filed 09/14/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 94
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.124 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.125 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.126 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.127 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.128 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.129 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.130 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.131 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.132 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.133 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.134 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.135 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.136 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.137 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.138 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.139 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.140 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12159-RHC-VMM ECF No. 16 filed 11/10/09 PageID.141 Page 18 of 18
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Agatha Auduon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Arkson
Nutraceuticals, Inc.


Date: 11/12/08                       By: /s/ Agatha Auduon
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Agatha Auduon
                                     Title: Chief Financial Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT PORTIS,

Petitioner, No. 09-13478

 Hon. John Corbett O'Meara

vs.

 

PERCY CONNERLY,

Respondent.

______________________________/

OPINION & ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS

MOOT

Petitioner, Robert Portis, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus on September 2,

2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, arguing that he was incarcerated in violation of his

constitutional rights. In his pro se petition, Petitioner challenged his Wayne Circuit Court conviction

for armed robbery. The Michigan Department of Corrections' Offender Tracking Information

System (OTIS), which this Court is permitted to take judicial notice of, See Ward v. Wolfenbarger,

323 F. Supp. 2d 818, 821, n. 3 (E.D. Mich. 2004), indicates that Petitioner died on June 23, 2010.

The death of an inmate during the pendency of his habeas petition renders the habeas action moot

and deprives the federal court of jurisdiction over the case. Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157, 1157

(9th Cir. 2003); Figueroa v. Rivera, 147 F.3d 77, 82 (1st Cir. 1998); Knapp v. Baker, 509 F.2d 922,

922 (5th Cir. 1975); In Re Kravitz, 504 F. Supp. 43, 52 (M.D. Pa. 1980). Based upon the foregoing,

the Court concludes that Petitioner's habeas claims have been rendered moot by his death.

Accordingly,

5:09-cv-13478-JCO-MJH Doc # 14 Filed 08/12/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 762
2

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas of corpus is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: August 12, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of

record on this date, August 12, 2011, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

5:09-cv-13478-JCO-MJH Doc # 14 Filed 08/12/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 763
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, George Heard, certify that:

1.
     I have reviewed this10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2007, of FLM Minerals Inc.;2.
     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a.
     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and5.
     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date:
     October 11, 2007
     GEORGE HEARDGeorge HeardPrincipal Executive Officer






---
#### Austin AGNEW and E. G. Parsly, as a Common Stockholders’ Committee, Interveners, Appellants, v. E. McLain WATTERS, Arthur Peck, and Pierce Archer, Jr., Debentureholders’ Protective Committee, Acting under Agreement of Deposit Dated January 28, 1932, of Holders of Debentures of Hamilton Gas Company, a Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 4285.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1938.

William M. Chadbourne, of New York City, Price, Smith & Spilman, of Charleston, W. Va., and Albert L. Cox, of Washington, D. C., in support of petition for. appeal.

Stanley C. Morris, of Charleston, W. Va., in opposition thereto.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20701

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANIEL PEREZ NEGRON, also known as Daniel Perez, also known as Daniel

Negron Perez, also known as Daniel Perez-Negron, also known as Raul

Gonzales,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CR-328-1

Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Perez Negron has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Negron has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-20701 Document: 00511963944 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
No. 11-20701

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d

381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).

2

Case: 11-20701 Document: 00511963944 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012
**Exhibit 32.2**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WABCO Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ulrich Michel, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

Dated: November 4, 2009