alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Jianye Fuel, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haishen Fei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 16, 2011

/s/ Haishen FeiName:Haishen Fei

Name:  Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES F. TOMASIK

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-12816

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING APRIL 9, 2010 REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION (#14), DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#12), GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#7), REVERSING THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE’S

DECISION

This matter is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment

as to plaintiff James Tomasik’s claim for judicial review of Defendant Commissioner of

Social Security's denial of his February 25, 2005 application for disability insurance

benefits. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. On April 9,

2010, Magistrate Judge Whalen issued a 16-page Report and Recommendation,

recommending that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted, that defendant's

motion for summary judgment be denied, reversing the ALJ’s decision and remanding to

the administrative level for further proceedings consistent with the Report and

Recommendation. Magistrate Judge Whalen found that although remand on the

physician’s report is inappropriate, remand regarding the vocational expert’s testimony is

appropriate. Further, Magistrate Judge Whalen found that plaintiff is entitled to a remand

pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Defendant has not filed timely objections
2

to the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); E.D. Mich. L.R.

72.1(d)(2).

Having reviewed the record and Report and Recommendation, and in the absence

of timely objections, the Court hereby ACCEPTS Magistrate Judge Whalen’s well reasoned

April 9, 2010 Report and Recommendation as its own. Plaintiff's motion for summary

judgment is hereby AFFIRMED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is hereby

DENIED. The administrative law judge’s decision is reversed and remanded to the

administrative level for further proceedings consistent with the Report and

Recommendation.

 SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 17, 2010

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

May 17, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        CAPITOL COMMUNITIES CORPORATION

                       Computation of Earnings Per Share
 
 
                               Fiscal Year Ended
                                  September,
 
                                             1997              1996
                                             ----              ----
 
Shares Outstanding Beginning               7,000,000         7,000,000
 Of Period
 
Shares Issued During Period
    October 7, 1996                           38,000                 -
    November 12, 1996                        150,000
    April 17, 1997                           (38,000)
    April 25, 1997                           (19,000)
    May 6, 1997                              (19,000)
    July 29, 1997                            200,000                 -
 
Weighted average number of                 7,171,014         7,000,000
 shares outstanding
 
Total                                      7,171,014         7,000,000
 
Earnings (loss) applicable to             $   40,807       $(1,109,053)
 common shares
 
Earnings (loss) per share of                 $(0.006)          $(0.158)
  common stock
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than August 29, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Campello Bancorp, Inc., Brockton, Massachusetts, to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
The Community Bank, a Massachusetts Co-operative Bank, Brockton, 
Massachusetts, in connection with the conversion of Campello Bancorp, 
Brockton, Massachusetts, from mutual to stock form.
    In connection with this application, the applicant also has applied 
to acquire Cody Services Corporation, Brockton, Massachusetts, and 
thereby engage in loan servicing activities, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Whitney Holding Corporation, New Orleans, Louisiana, to merge 
with Parish National Corporation, Covington, Louisiana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Parish National Bank, Bogalusa, Louisiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, July 30, 2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-17801 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Order filed April 18, 2013 Withdrawn, Motion Granted; Appeal Reinstated

and Order filed May 9 , 2012.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00167

- CR

____________ MARK BRIAN MORRIS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1356410



### ORDER

On April 18, 2013 , this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to appoint counsel on appeal

. Today, appel lant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal because counsel has been appointed.The motion is granted. Our order of April 18, 2013 , is withdrawn. The

appeal is reinstated. The reporter’s record is due June 10, 2013

.
PER CURIAM
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3783

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow farmers to income

average over 2 years.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1996

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr.

JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. EWING, Mr. POMBO, Mr.

EVERETT, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. COOLEY of Oregon, Mr.

CHAMBLISS, and Mr. NETHERCUTT) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow

farmers to income average over 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AVERAGING OF FARM INCOME OVER 2 YEARS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart B of part II of sub5 chapter E of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

6 1986 (relating to taxable year for which items of gross

7 income included) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section:
2

•HR 3783 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 460A. AVERAGING OF FARM INCOME.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—At the election of a taxpayer en3 gaged in a farming business, the tax imposed by section

4 1 for such taxable year shall be equal to the sum of—

5 ‘‘(1) a tax computed under such section on tax6 able income reduced by elected farm income, plus

7 ‘‘(2) the increase in tax which would result if

8 taxable income for the prior taxable year were in9 creased by the elected farm income.

10 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

11 ‘‘(1) ELECTED FARM INCOME.—

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘elected

13 farm income’ means so much of the taxable in14 come for the taxable year—

15 ‘‘(i) which is attributable to any farm16 ing business, and

17 ‘‘(ii) which is specified in the election

18 under subsection (a).

19 ‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF GAINS.—For pur20 poses of subparagraph (A), gain from the sale

21 or other disposition of property (other than

22 land) regularly used by the taxpayer in a farm23 ing business for a substantial period before

24 such sale or disposition shall be treated as at25 tributable to a faming business.
3

•HR 3783 IH

1 ‘‘(2) FARMING BUSINESS.—The term ‘farming

2 business’ has the meaning given such term by sec3 tion 263A(e)(4).

4 ‘‘(c) TERMINATION.—This section shall not apply to

5 the determination of tax for any taxable year beginning

6 after December 31, 2002.’’

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

8 for such subpart B is amended by adding at the end the

9 following new item:

‘‘Sec. 460A. Averaging of farm income.’’

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit (11) - Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share and
                  Pro Forma Earnings Per Share (1998)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Year Ended September 30,
                                                       1998           1997           1996
                                              --------------  ------------- -------------
   <S>                                        <C>             <C>           <C>
   Average number of shares outstanding          32,229,366     31,507,622     27,655,964
                                              ============== =============  =============
   Net loss                                   $ (10,404,000)  $ (5,302,000) $ (26,593,178)
   Less:  amortization of redeemable
     preferred stock beneficial conversion
     discount                                 $           0   $ (2,222,000) $           0

   Less:  cumulative dividend on
     redeemable preferred stock               $    (895,000)  $   (385,000) $           0
                                              --------------  ------------- -------------
   Loss applicable to common shares           $ (11,299,000)  $ (7,909,000) $ (26,593,178)
                                              ==============  ============= ==============

   Net loss per share                         $       (0.34)  $      (0.25) $       (0.96)
                                              ==============  ============= ==============
</TABLE>
** **

**EXHIBIT23**

** **

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-136473,333-128923, 333-115840, 333-110264, 333-44954, 333-92629, 333-92631, 333-57331,333-32911 and 333-08863 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 29,2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of FEI Company andsubsidiaries (the “Company”) (which reports include an explanatory paragraphreferring to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards BoardInterpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertaintyin Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109* and anexplanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 123R, *Share Based Payment)*,**and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofthe Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

 

 

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP

February 29, 2008

 

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 06-cr-20465

Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

v. 

D-37 ANTHONY CLARK,

Defendant.

 /

ATTORNEYAPPEARANCE

NOWCOMES ROBYN B. FRANKEL and hereby enters her Appearance as attorney

for the Defendant, ANTHONYCLARK, in the above entitled cause of action.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robyn B. Frankel

Robyn B. Frankel (P43629)

Attorney for Defendant Anthony Clark

26611 Woodward Avenue

Huntington Woods, MI 48070

(248) 541-5200

robyn720@comcast.net

Date: March 28, 2014

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on March 28, 2014, she electronically filed the

foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to all parties of record.

/s/ Robyn B. Frankel

Robyn B. Frankel (P43629)

Attorney for Defendant Anthony Clark

26611 Woodward Avenue

Huntington Woods, MI 48070

(248) 541-5200

robyn720@comcast.net

2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM Doc # 2554 Filed 03/28/14 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 18654
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BCSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 24, 2009 |  | /s/ Joseph J. Bouffard                              
|                        |  | Joseph J. Bouffard                                  
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                        | 
|Date: February 24, 2009 |  | /s/ Anthony R. Cole                                 
|                        |  | Anthony R. Cole                                     
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, David Roff, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


     Dated: March 1, 2010


     /s/ "David Roff"

     David Roff
     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7501
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH HARRIS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Ric hard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-25-NN, CA-95-78-4) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harris , Nos. CR-93-25-WN; CA-95-78-4 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 21.1

                                   Percent
Subsidiaries of PHC, Inc.         Ownership         Type of Business

PHC of Michigan, Inc.                 100%       Psychiatric care
North Point-Pioneer, Inc.             100%       Psychiatric care /
                                                   Substance abuse
PHC of Virginia, Inc.                 100%       Substance abuse
Pivotal Research Centers, Inc.        100%       Clinical trials
PHC of Utah, Inc.                     100%       Substance abuse
PHC of Nevada, Inc.                   100%       Psychiatric care /
                                                   Substance abuse
Behavioral Health Online, Inc.        100%       Internet wellness services
Wellplace, Inc.                       100%       Community support services /
                                                   Employee assistance programs
Detroit Behavioral Institute, Inc.    100%       Adjudicated youth residential
Seven Hills Hospital, Inc.            100%       Psychiatric care
 (facility not yet opened)



                                        185
#### LAGARDE et ux. v. LIBERTY SHOP, Limited, Inc.

No. 13849.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

Jan. 11, 1932.

F. W. Gaudin, M. R. De Reyna, and E. K. Gaudet, all of New Orleans, for appellants.

Eraste Vidrine, of New Orleans, for appel-lee.

WESTERFIELD, J.

This case results from an intersectional collision between a motortruck and an automobile.

The trial court, in dismissing the main and reconventional demands, evidently concluded that both drivers were at fault, and so it seems to us. Both drivers failed to stop or slacken their speed before entering the intersection, and neither saw the other until *68just before tbe impact. Both were guilty of negligence in failing to keep a proper lookout and in failing to stop, or slow down. The fact that the comer where the accident occurred, Chestnut and Josephine streets, is what is known as a “blind crossing,” where it is difficult for drivers approaching the intersection at right angles to see each other, necessitates the exercise of care commensurate with the danger involved.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CHERYL GAGNON, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

CLIENT SERVICES, INC., COLE 

EDWARDS, and JOHN DOE, Individually 

and Jointly, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO: CV - 09-12342 

HON. GERALD E. ROSEN 

MAG. JUDGE MICHAEL HLUCHANIUK 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CASE IS RESOLVED and that the final 

dismissal documents will be filed forthwith upon payment of the settlement check to the 

Plaintiff. 

Dated: March 15, 2010 

Respectfully submitted, 

REX ANDERSON PC

By: /s/ Rex C. Anderson____ 

Rex C. Anderson, Esq. (P47068) 

9459 Lapeer Rd 

Davison MI 48423 

Telephone: (810) 653-3300 

Facsimile: (810) 658-2510 

rex@rexandersonpc.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on March 15, 2010, a copy of the above document was filed with the Clerk 

of the Court using the Court's Electronic Filing System which will send notice of said filing to 

the following: 

jbolton@clarkhill.comUTH

 __/s/ Rex C. Anderson___________ 

 Rex C. Anderson, Esq. (P47068) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

9459 Lapeer Rd 

Davison MI 48423 

Telephone: (810) 653-3300 

 rex@rexandersonpc.com

Case 2:09-cv-12342-GER-MJH ECF No. 16, PageID.76 Filed 03/15/10 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Home
Buy & Sell Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel L. Baxter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ 
      Daniel L. BaxterDaniel
      L. Baxter
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                April
      8, 2008