alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Neuroscience Review Subcommittee.
    Date: November 13-14, 2008.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6a4a4b3bca7b586aba7afaae8a8afaee8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8dadacdc2d9cbf8d5d9d1d496d6d1d096dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 31 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
 [FR Doc. E8-18254 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Corporation.

|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/    Michael J. Culotta                                                          
|Michael J. Culotta Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 4, 2011
EXHIBIT "A"

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 153-2 Filed 11/24/2009 Page 1 of 2
From:

To:

Subject: FW: U.S. v. Bartko

Date: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:46:12 PM

Attachments:

Importance: High

From: Lundy, James [mailto:LUNDYJ@SEC.GOV] 

Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:56 PM

To: gbartko@securitieslawcounsel.com

Cc: Polish, Jonathan S.; Hanauer, Benjamin J.; Earle Erman; jquasarano@bodmanllp.com;

donnini@butzel.com; richotte@butzel.com; gsaretsky@saretsky.com; aharris@bodmanllp.com;

sa@alawdetroit.com; lbaughman@kaalaw.com; tdillon@slk-law.com; pfugee@ralaw.com;

cdk@millerlawpc.com; rkilpatrick@kaalaw.com; MacKay, John N.; Michael.Riordan@usdoj.gov

Subject: U.S. v. Bartko

Importance: High

Greg,

Please see the attached link and copy of your indictment for your reference. We trust that you plan to

advise Judge Lawson and your client of this development and of any conditions of your bond that may

impact your ability to represent your client or to appear before Judge Lawson. If you do not plan to do

so, please let us know so that we can proceed accordingly. If you have already advised Judge Lawson

some time in the two weeks that have passed since the indictment was returned, just let us know and

provide us with the information regarding you providing such a notice.

One way or the other we expect that this will be addressed before the next time that you appear before

Judge Lawson on Monday.

Jim

James G. Lundy

Senior Trial Counsel

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Case 2:09-cv-12950-DML-VMM Document 153-2 Filed 11/24/2009 Page 2 of 2
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 13, 2009 | /s/ Qingqing Wu                    |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                       | Qingqing      Wu                   |
|                       | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                       | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
6/7/2013


 


Unsecured
Promissory Note Agreement


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ATTUNE RTD, a
Nevada corporation (hereinafter called the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Tim Smith, a
natural person, or registered assigns (the “Holder”) the sum of $10,000.00 on October 7, 2013 (the “Maturity
Date”).


 


The Following Terms Shall Apply:


 


The “Borrower”
and or “Holder” have the right, but not the obligation to convert the “Note” into shares of restricted
common stock fixed at $0.02, the closing price as of the date of this “Note” at any time before midnight on or before
the “Maturity Date”.


 


Furthermore, in lieu of cash repayment,
the “Borrower” and “Holder” have agreed to convert the “Unsecured Promissory Note” dated 7/23/2012,
with a face value of $10,000 earning no interest, into 500,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.02 per share, the closing
price as of the date of this note, on or before the “Maturity Date”.


 


This Note and any provision hereof may
only be amended by an instrument in writing signed by the Borrower and the Holder. The term “Note” and all reference
thereto, as used throughout this instrument, shall mean this instrument as originally executed, or if later amended or supplemented,
then as so amended or supplemented.


 


Assignability.
This Note shall be binding upon the Borrower and its successors and assigns, and shall inure to be the benefit of the Holder and
its successors and assigns.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused
this Note to be signed in its name by its duly authorized officer this Thursday, June 7, 2013


 


	 	DATE	 
	Thomas S. Bianco, C.F.O (For the Company)	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	DATE	6.07.2013
	Tim Smith
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A 

A CORPORATION OF FRANCE, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 09-10534 

 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

v. 

 

KEITH CHILDRESS 

d/b/a PRACTICAL CATIA, 

 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________/ 

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for reconsideration [dkt 118], in which 

Defendant requests that the Court reconsider its order denying Defendant’s motion to quash Plaintiff’s 

third-party subpoenas. Although E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(h)(2) generally disallows a response to motions for 

reconsideration, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant’s motion on the record during 

the January 10, 2013, scheduling conference. Plaintiff complied with the Court’s order, and Defendant 

then replied. 

 Local rule 7.1(h) governs motions for reconsideration, stating that “the court will not grant 

motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely presents the same issues ruled upon by the court, 

either expressly or by reasonable implication.” E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(h)(3). The same subsection further 

states, “the movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have 

been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.” Id. 

A defect is palpable when it is obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Mktg. Displays, Inc. v. 

Traffix Devices, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 262, 278 (E.D. Mich. 1997). 

2:09-cv-10534-MOB-MJH Doc # 183 Filed 09/03/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2873
 For the reasons stated in the Court’s July 31, 2012, order and Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s 

motion, Defendant fails to demonstrate a “palpable defect” by which the Court was misled, nor can 

Defendant demonstrate that the correction of any alleged defect “will result in a different disposition of 

the case.” Defendant merely presents the same issues already ruled upon by the Court. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for reconsideration [dkt 118] 

is DENIED. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Defendant’s motion for reconsideration requests 

that the Court stay the proceedings in this matter, such request is DENIED. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 Date: September 3, 2013 s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff

 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

 U.S. District Judge 

 

2:09-cv-10534-MOB-MJH Doc # 183 Filed 09/03/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2874
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20209-02

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

LEO WADE,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On December 16, 2009, this case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

December 18, 2009. In open court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by

Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense(s) to which Defendant pleaded guilty is(are) supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have ordered the

preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:09-cr-20209-TLL-CEB Doc # 33 Filed 12/18/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 101
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and Recommendation

within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure

to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins. Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596

(6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The parties are

advised that making some objections, but failing to raise others, will not preserve all the objections

a party may have to this Report and Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security,

474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir. 2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich.

LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: December 18, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on Shane Waller and Paul Beggs, and served on District Judge Ludington

in the traditional manner.

Date: December 18, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

1:09-cr-20209-TLL-CEB Doc # 33 Filed 12/18/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 102
EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Everest Reinsurance  Holding,  Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-9172 and File No.
333-05771)  of  our  report  dated  February  13,  1997,  on  our  audit  of the
consolidated  financial  statements and financial statement schedules of Everest
Reinsurance  Holdings,  Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and for the year then ended
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

New York, New York
February 13, 1997


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2482-078]


Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P.; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

July 30, 2008.
    An environmental assessment (EA) is available for public review. 
The EA was prepared for an application filed by Erie Boulevard 
Hydropower, L.P on April 21, 2008, requesting the Commission's 
authorization to permit the Saratoga County Water Authority (SCWA) to 
withdraw water at a rate of 14 million gallons per day from the Sherman 
Island reservoir for municipal use.
    The EA evaluates the environmental impacts that would result from 
permitting the SCWA to withdraw water from the Sherman Island 
reservoir. The proposal would include the construction of a screened 
intake facility placed on the bottom of the reservoir and a section of 
buried pipe that would extend to a pumping station located outside the 
project boundary. The EA finds that approval of the application would 
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the 
quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order 
Approving Non-Project Use of Lands and Waters'', issued July 30, 2008 
and is available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference 
Room, or it may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number ``P-
2482'' in the docket field to access the document. For assistance, call 
toll-free 1-(866)-208-3372 or (202) 502-8659 (for TTY).

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18059 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-31 Filed 11/19/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-31 Filed 11/19/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-31 Filed 11/19/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-31 Filed 11/19/10 Page 4 of 4
```

        Set forth below is a table listing the Company's significant subsidiaries:

                                                          Country of                % of
Name of Company                                         Incorporation            Ownership*
-------------------------------------------------   -----------------------    ---------------
Aberdeen Management Limited                         Channel Islands                 100%
GGRI, Inc.                                          United States                   (2)
Island Hotel Company Limited                        The Bahamas                     (1)
Paradise Beach Inn, Limited                         The Bahamas                     (6)
Paradise Enterprises Limited                        The Bahamas                     (1)
Paradise Island Limtied                             The Bahamas                     (1)
PIV, Inc.                                           United States                   (5)
Purposeful BV                                       Netherlands                     (7)
Resorts International Hotel, Inc.                   United States                  (3)(4)
Sun Cove Limited                                    United States                   (2)
Sun Cove New York, Inc.                             United States                   (2)
Sun Hotels International (Bermuda), Limited         Bermuda                         100%
Sun Hotels International Management NV              N. Antilles                     100%
Sun International Bahamas, Limited                  The Bahamas                     100%
Sun International Development Limited               The Bahamas                     (1)
Sun International Management Ltd.                   British Virgin Islands          100%
Sun International Management (UK) Ltd.              United Kingdom                  100%
Sun International Marketing, Inc.                   United States                   (2)
Sun International New York, Inc.                    United States                   (2)
Sun International North America, Inc.               United States                   100%
Sun International Resorts, Inc.                     United States                   (2)
Sun Vacances SA                                     France                          (8)
Sunonline Limited                                   The Bahamas                     100%

* % Voting Power equals % of Ownership
(1)  100% owned by Sun International Bahamas, Limited
(2)  100% owned by Sun International North America, Inc.
(3)  100% owned by GGRI, Inc.
(4)  Sold on April 25, 2001 as part of the Resorts Atlantic City Sale
(5)  100% owned by Sun International Resorts, Inc.
(6)  100% owned by Paradise Island Ltd.
(7)  100% owned by Sun Hotels International Management NV
(8)  100% owned by Purposeful BV
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL AXELSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL

MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., MIAN Z.

QAYYUM, GREG C. SOTTEK, DALE

KINNER, and KHAWAJA N. IKRAM,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-12514

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

On June 25, 2009, former Michigan prisoner Michael Axelson (“Plaintiff”) filed

this action against Defendants alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and gross

negligence in violation of Michigan law. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights

when he broke his thumb during his incarceration in May 2008. In an opinion and order

issued April 9, 2010, this Court granted Defendant Khawaja N. Ikram’s motion for

summary judgment. In an opinion and order issued on this date, the Court granted the

remaining defendants’ motions to dismiss and/or for summary judgment.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Judgment is entered in
favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE.

DATE: November 1, 2010 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Lawrence J. Schloss, Esq.

A. Peter Govorchin, Esq.

Brian J. Richtarcik, Esq.

Randall A. Juip, Esq.

Thomas E. Keenan, Esq.

Davidde A. Stella, Esq.

Edward C. Cutlip, Jr., Esq.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Max Weinberg, Appellant.

Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with usual leave to the defendant to amend the answer upon payment of the costs at the Trial Term and in this court. All concurred.
##### 



Exhibit 10.27
 PROMISSORY NOTE AND LOAN MODIFICATION AGREEMENT
 A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.
 A.C. Moore Incorporated
 Moorestown Finance, Inc.
 Blackwood Assets, Inc.
 A.C. Moore Urban Renewal, LLC    Borrower
 Wachovia Bank, National Association    Bank
  RECITALS
 $35MM Note $22.5MM Note $7.5MM Note Loan Agreement Security Agreement




---



##### 



AGREEMENT
 $35MM NOTE MODIFICATIONS.
 Maturity Date Maturity Date
 Repayment Terms
 $35MM NOTE, $22.5MM NOTE AND $7.5MM NOTE MODIFICATIONS
 Interest Rate. Margin DSCR
 DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO  TRAILING 12 MONTHS
 GREATER
    
    LESS THANTHAN
    
    OR EQUAL TO
    
    MARGIN1.75
    
    
    
    
    
    
    0.50
    %1.35
    
    
    1.75
    
    
    
    0.65
    %1.25
    
    
    1.35
    
    
    
    0.90
    %
 Negative Covenants.
 Change in Fiscal Year
 Encumbrances
 Default on Other Contracts or Obligations.
 Financial Covenants.
 Debt Service Coverage Ratio Debt Service
Coverage Ratio
 -2-




---



##### 



Material Acquisitions
 Limitation on Debt.
 Default.
 Cross Default Affiliate Borrower Debtor Subsidiary
 Cessation; Bankruptcy
 Material Capital Structure or Business Alteration
 Material Adverse Change
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND REPRESENTATIONS.
 -3-




---



##### 



COLLATERAL.
 MISCELLANEOUS.
 FEES.
 LIMITATION ON LIABILITY; WAIVER OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
 FINAL AGREEMENT.
 DEFINITIONS. Loan Documents
 -4-




---



##### 



WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. .
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.
Taxpayer Identification Number: 22-3527763By:
    
    /s/ Marc Katz
    
    (SEAL)Name: Marc Katz
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA.C. Moore Incorporated
Taxpayer Identification Number: 22-2546111By:
    
    /s/ Marc Katz
    
    (SEAL)Name: Marc Katz
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMoorestown Finance, Inc.
Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-2066272By:
    
    /s/ Marc Katz
    
    (SEAL)Name: Marc Katz
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 -5-




---



##### 



Blackwood Assets, Inc.
Taxpayer Identification Number: 52-2066271By:
    
    /s/ Marc Katz
    
    (SEAL)Name: Marc Katz
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA.C. Moore Urban Renewal, LLC
Taxpayer Identification Number: 56-2388590By:
    
    /s/ Marc Katz
    
    (SEAL)Name: Marc Katz
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerWachovia Bank, National AssociationBy:
    
    /s/ Dante Bucci
    
    (SEAL)Name: Dante Bucci
Title: Senior Vice President
 -6-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Clifton E Jackson, et al.,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:09−cv−11529−DML−VMM

Hon. David M. Lawson

Segwick Claims Management

Services, Inc., et al.,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING

 You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable David M. Lawson at the United

States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Detroit,

Michigan. The following motion(s) are scheduled for hearing:

Motion to Dismiss − #15

• MOTION HEARING: 8/25/09 at 04:00 PM

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/ D. Opalewski 

Case Manager

Dated: June 24, 2009

2:09-cv-11529-NGE-VMM Doc # 18 Filed 06/24/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 251