alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8702-2] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of document availability. 

# SUMMARY:

EPA is announcing the availability of a memorandum entitled “Award of Special Appropriations Act Project Grants Authorized by the Agency's FY 2008 Appropriations Act.” This memorandum provides information and guidelines on how EPA will award and administer grants for the special projects identified in the State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG) account of the Agency's FY 2008 Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 110-161). The STAG account provides budget authority for funding identified water, wastewater and groundwater infrastructure projects. Each grant recipient will receive a copy of this document from EPA. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        The subject memorandum may be viewed and downloaded from EPA's homepage,                         *http://www.epa.gov/​owm/​cwfinance/​cwsrf/​law.htm*.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        George Ames, (202) 564-0661 or                         *ames.george@epa.gov*.                     

Dated: June 17, 2008. 

James A. Hanlon, 

Director,  Office of Wastewater Management.

[FR Doc. E8-18332 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHAWN HOY, et al, 

Plaintiffs,

v

WASHTENAW COUNTY, et al,

Defendants.

/

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-11352

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REASSIGNMENT

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reassignment. The Court being fully

advised in the premises,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. 

 s/ Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: October 14, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, October 14, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/ Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-11352-AC-PJK Doc # 18 Filed 10/14/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 116
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”),
I, Charles A. Dinarello, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)             The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)             The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by this report.








Date:  October
      30, 2009
            /s/ Charles A. Dinarello,
      M.D.Charles
      A. Dinarello, M.D.Acting
      Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. Jacob TEICH, an Individual, Trading as David Teitz and Son, and Continental Casualty Company, a Corporation Organized and Existing under the Laws of the State of Indiana, Appellees.

No. 4277.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 13, 1938.

Sterling Hutcheson, U. S. Atty., of Richmond, Va., and H. H. Holt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., of Norfolk, Va., for appellant.

Braden Vandeventer, of Norfolk, Va., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Case dismissed under rule 20 in accordance with agreement of counsel.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LISA JESSEN,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-12280

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE and LIFE 

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH 

AMERICA,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES

On June 21, 2011, this Court entered an opinion and order granting plaintiff’s motion to

reverse administrative denial of insurance benefits and denying defendant’s motion to affirm the

administrator’s decision. On June 22, 2011, the plaintiff requested costs and attorney’s fees under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g). The Court denied the plaintiff’s

request for failure to state the amount of attorney’s fees requested and for failure to provide

documentation that would allow the Court to calculate reasonable attorney’s fees. This matter is

before the Court on the plaintiff’s second motion for costs and attorney’s fees.

The plaintiff’s second motion for costs and attorney’s fees asks the Court to consider an issue

already decided by the Court. Although the plaintiff’s latest motion for costs and attorney’s fees

includes the information that the Court previously identified as lacking, the plaintiff has not moved

this Court to reconsider its previous decision. Motions for reconsideration may be granted pursuant

to E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(1) when the moving party shows (1) a “palpable defect,” (2) that misled

the court and the parties, and (3) that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the

case. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(3). A “palpable defect” is a defect which is obvious, clear,

2:09-cv-12280-DML-RSW Doc # 31 Filed 07/14/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1395
-2-

unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Mich. Dep’t of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731, 734

(E.D. Mich. 2002) (citations omitted). The plaintiff has not pointed to a palpable defect that misled

the Court; therefore, the Court will not reconsider its previous decision.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s second motion for costs and attorney’s fees

[dkt. #30] is DENIED.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 14, 2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 14, 2011.

s/Deborah R. Tofil 

DEBORAH R. TOFIL

2:09-cv-12280-DML-RSW Doc # 31 Filed 07/14/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1396
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007 (the Report), I, Robert B. Harris, Ph.D., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of
1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|               |  |                            
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------
|March 30, 2007 |  | /s/ Robert B. Harris, Ph.D.
|               |  | Robert B. Harris, Ph.D.    
|               |  | President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFF DYE, TAMMIE ERSKINE, PATRICK

HALL AND ERIC PERTTUNEN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

OFFICE OF RACING COMMISSION, ET

AL,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-13048

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

JUDGMENT

The Court having reviewed the pleadings in this matter and being fully advised in the

premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ motion for summary

judgment is hereby GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: May 31, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on May 31, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

 

2:09-cv-13048-NGE-MAR Doc # 55 Filed 05/31/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 1303
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 40-F
  o Registration statement pursuant to section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 or
 þ Annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 Commission File Number: 1-31556
 FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED
  Canada
 6331
 95 Wellington Street West
Suite 800
Toronto, Ontario Canada
M5J 2N7
(416) 367-4941
  Not Applicable
 CT Corporation System
111 Eighth Avenue, 13th Floor
New York, NY 10011
U.S.A.
(212) 894-8700
 
 Not
Applicable
  Subordinate Voting Shares
  Not Applicable
  þ þ
  Subordinate Voting Shares 
Multiple Voting Shares
    
    19,706,477
1,548,000
  Yes þ
    
    No o
  Yes o
    
    No o




---



##### 



UNDERTAKING AND CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS
  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
  Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
  Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
   IDENTIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT




---



##### 



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
  CODE OF ETHICS
  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
  Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
   OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS




---



##### 



TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
   FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITEDDate:    March 4, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Bradley P. MartinName:
    Bradley P. MartinTitle:
    Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and 
Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 1
    
    Annual Information Form dated March 4, 20112
    
    Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Registrant as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010, the related notes and the auditors report relating
to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting3
    
    Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations dated March 4, 2011, including Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting4
    
    Narrative Description of Business dated March 4, 20115
    
    The information under Statement of Corporate Governance Practices in
the Registrants Management Proxy Circular, dated March 4, 2011 in
connection with the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April
20, 2011, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to the
Registrants Report on Form 6-K furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 4, 20116
    
    [intentionally omitted]7
    
    Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP regarding its report dated March
4, 20118
    
    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications:Certification of Registrants Chief Executive Officer
Certification of Registrants Chief Financial Officer9
    
    Section 1350 Certifications:Certification of Registrants Chief Executive Officer
Certification of Registrants Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 14, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 0038 7

- CR

Veronica ALEGRIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR5021A

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738

(1967); however, the brief is not accompanied by:

(1) a motion to withdraw;

(2) an exhibit showing that counsel has notified appellant that, should

appellant wish to exercise the right to review the appellate record in preparing to

file a response to the Anders brief, appellant should immediately file a motion for

pro se access to the appellate record with this court and provided appellant with

a form motion for this purpose and a mailing address for this court

.

See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

- 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State , 954

S.W.2d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex. App.

— San Ant onio 1997, no pet

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant’s attorney file the requisite motion and exhibit in

this court no later than 10 days from the date of this order

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.145 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.146 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.147 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.148 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.149 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.150 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.151 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.152 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.153 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.154 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.155 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.156 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.157 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.158 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.159 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.160 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.161 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.162 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.163 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.164 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.165 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.166 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.167 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.168 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.169 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.170 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.171 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.172 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.173 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH ECF No. 43 filed 12/22/09 PageID.174 Page 30 of 30
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAMUEL RIDDLE, JR., and MARY

WATERS,

Defendants.

 /

Case Number: 09-20295

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SAMUEL L. 

RIDDLE JR.'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEA

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Samuel L. Riddle, Jr.'s Motion to

Withdraw Plea (Doc. No. 118). Riddle pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit bribery

and extortion, and filing false tax returns on May 20, 2010, pursuant to a Rule 11 Plea

Agreement.

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure governs pleas. Rule 11(e)

reads, "After the court imposes sentence, the defendant may not withdraw a plea of

guilty. . .and the plea may be set aside only on direct appeal or collateral attack." FED.

R. CRIM. P. 11(e).

On October 6, 2010, the Court sentenced Riddle to imprisonment for a term of

thirty-seven months. The Judgment was filed October 7, 2010. Given the clear

language of Rule 11(e), and the fact that this Court sentenced Riddle before the motion

was filed, the Court DENIES Riddle's motion. 
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: October 20, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon counsel of record and Samuel Riddle, Jr.

on this date by ordinary mail and electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of - )

)

Chugach Federal Solutions, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos. 63192, 63193

)

Under Contract No. FA5000-13-C-0005 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas L. Patin, Esq.

Lisa A. Markman, Esq.

 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

 Washington, DC 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

 Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Josephine R. Farinelli, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 27, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 63192, 63193, Appeals of Chugach 

Federal Solutions, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 28, 2022

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT FEB RUARY 9, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 06- 1425 0 Non-A rgum ent Calendar
D. C. Dock et No. 0 5- 00 10 3- CV-FTM -9 9- DNF L U A NN G U Y , ind ivi dua lly

a nd o n be ha lf of a ll tho se sim ilarl y

sit ua te d, Plaintiff, ETHEL COY, Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,
ve rs us ALLSTATE FLORIDIAN INSURANCE COM PANY, De fendant-Appellee. Appeal f rom the United State s District Court fo r the Mi ddl e D istri ct

of F lor ida (F eb ru ar y 9, 200 7) Be fo re A N D E RS O N , D U BI N A a nd B A RKE T T , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

Appellant, L u Ann Guy

(“ Guy ”) brought an action in th e district court seeking ins urance benef

its und er policies issued byAllstate F loridian Insurance Com pany (“ Allstate Floridian”). Specif ically , G uy

alleged that her hom e suffer ed
m old da m ag e af

te r H ur ri cane Ch ar le y , a nd s he sou ght r ec ove ry of m old
re m ed ia tio n be ne fi ts u nde r he r hom eo w ne rs ins ur an ce pol ic y . G uy sou ght to
m ai nta in the c as e on b eh al f of aput at ive c la ss o f ins ur ed s w ho s uf fe re d m old da m ag e to the ir

hom es . A m ag istra te j udge r ec om m en de d th at

the m oti on f

or c la ss certific ation be denied. T he district court adopted th e m agistrate j udge’s r eport
an d r ec om

m en da tio n a nd d en ie d c la ss c er tif ic at ionon thr ee gr ound s: l ac k of
co m m on al it y , lac k o f pr ed om in an ce, an d l ackof s up eri or it y . T his c ourt r ev ie w s a n or de r de ny ing c la ss c er tif ic at ionf or abuse of di sc ret io n. H

ines v . W idn all , 334 F. 3d 12 53, 1255 (11t h Cir. 2003 ). T he district
co urt a buse s it s di sc re tio n w he n it “ fa ils to ap ply

the pr ope r le ga l st an da rd or to follow proper procedures in m aking th e determ ination , or m akes findings of fac t that are c learly

err oneous .” H

ef fne r v . B lue Cr oss and

B lue Shi el

d of A lab am a, Inc. , 443 F
. 3d 1 330, 133 7 ( 11t h C ir
. 200 6) ( quot ing Birm ingh am Steel Corp. v. TVA , 353 F. 3d 13 31, 1335 (11t h Cir. 2003 ). Af ter re viewing the record and reading the parties’ briefs, we conclude that th ere was no ab us e o f di sc ret io n b y th e d is tri ct co ur t i n d en y in g c la ss cert ifi cat io n.W e de ny a ll pe ndi ng m oti ons as m oot
. 1 3 Sp ec if ic al ly , w e ag re e w iththe dis tr ic t c ourt tha t the appe llant c oul d no t e sta bli sh
com m on qu estions of lawand fact bec ause these claim s are base d on th e existence
an d e xt en t o f m ol d d am ag e to in su red ho m es aft er t he 20 04 Flo rid a h ur ric an es . W e al so a gr ee w iththe dis tr ic t c ourt’ s f ind ing tha t c om

m on i ssu es do n ot p r e d o mi n a t e a n dt h a tac l a s s a c t i o n i s n o tas up e r i o r me t h o dt o r e s o l v e c l a i ms
se ek in g m ol d re m ed ia ti on be ne fit s u nd er h om eo wne rs in su ran ce p ol ic ie s. A cc or din gly , w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s or de r de ny ing c la ss c er tif ic at ion
. AFFIRMED. 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16755]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:03 a.m. on 
Tuesday, June 25, 1996, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate and supervisory activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., seconded by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), concurred in by Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of 
the Currency), Mr. Kenneth F. Ryder, acting in the place and stead of 
Director Jonathan L. Fiechter (Acting Director, Office of Thrift 
Supervision), and Chairman Ricki Helfer, that Corporation business 
required its consideration of the matters on less than seven days' 
notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), 
(c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: June 25, 1996.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16755 Filed 6-26-96; 3:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M