alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3680

To amend title 18, United States Code, to carry out the international obligations of the United States under the Geneva Conventions to provide

criminal penalties for certain war crimes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 19, 1996

Mr. JONES (for himself, Mr. HOKE, Mr. STUMP, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. MCHALE,

Mr. HUNTER, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr.

TORKILDSEN, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. MCHUGH,

Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. LONGLEY, and Mr.

KOLBE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to carry out the

international obligations of the United States under the

Geneva Conventions to provide criminal penalties for certain war crimes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Crimes Act of

5 1996’’.
2

•HR 3680 IH

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN WAR CRIMES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

3 amended by inserting after chapter 117 the following:

4 ‘‘CHAPTER 118—WAR CRIMES

‘‘Sec.

‘‘2401. War crimes.

5 ‘‘§ 2401. War crimes

6 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever, whether inside or outside

7 the United States, commits a grave breach of the Geneva

8 Conventions, in any of the circumstances described in sub9 section (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned

10 for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results

11 to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

12 ‘‘(b) CIRCUMSTANCES.—The circumstances referred

13 to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such

14 breach or the victim of such breach is a member of the

15 armed forces of the United States or a national of the

16 United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigra17 tion and Nationality Act).

18 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term

19 ‘grave breach of the Geneva Conventions’ means conduct

20 defined as a grave breach in any of the international con21 ventions relating to the laws of warfare signed at Geneva

22 12 August 1949 or any protocol to any such convention,

23 to which the United States is a party.’’
3

•HR 3680 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

2 for part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

3 inserting after the item relating to chapter 117 the follow4 ing new item:

‘‘118. War crimes ................................................................................ 2401’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., a corporation
organized under the laws of Delaware (the Company), filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

March 31, 2006

| | /s/  JOSEPH V. TARANTO  
| | ------------------------
| | ________________________
| | Joseph V. Taranto       
| | Chairman and            
| | Chief Executive Officer 

| | /s/  STEPHEN L. LIMAURO     
| | ----------------------------
| | ________________________    
| | Stephen L. Limauro          
| | Executive Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer
Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. 10-Q








Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/s/ Albert F. BuzzettiAlbert F. BuzzettiChairman and Chief Executive Officer







/s/ Michael LeslerPresident and Chief Operating Officer







November 16, 2009
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7166** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
GEORGE THOMAS CABEL, a/k/a PY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Thomas D. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:97

- cr
- 00173

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : December 15, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

George Thomas Cabel , Appellant Pro Se

. Rober t Michael Hamilton, Assistant United S tates Attorney , Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
George Thomas Cabel appeals from the district court’s order
granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated b y the district court. United

States v. Cabel , No. 1:97

- cr
- 00173

- TDS

- 1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18,
2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid t he decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted Cabel’s § 3582 (c)(2) motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Cabel’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
**EXHIBIT 31.3**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Tamrha V. Mangelsen, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: February 29, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

MISC. NO. 09-mc-51004

-vsHON. PAUL D. BORMAN

CHARLES R. PLOOF,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner having applied for an order to enforce an Internal Revenue Service

Summons relating to the tax liability of respondent, Charles R. Ploof, and personally served

upon him on September 10, 2009, this cause having come on before the undersigned

pursuant to an Order to Show Cause issued September 2, 2009, and due deliberation

having been had herein; it is hereby

ORDERED that the Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons is

GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent, Charles R. Ploof, appear before Revenue Officer

Angela Davis or her designated representative at 10:00 a.m. on November 12, 2009, at

1270 Pontiac, Pontiac Road, Michigan, then and there to be sworn, to give testimony, and

to produce for examination and copying the books, records, papers and other data 

2:09-mc-51004-PDB-DAS Doc # 7 Filed 11/09/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 59
demanded by the summons served upon Charles R. Ploof on February 6, 2009, the

examination to continue from day to day until completed.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: November 9, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S.

Mail on November 9, 2009.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:09-mc-51004-PDB-DAS Doc # 7 Filed 11/09/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 60
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46005-46006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18107]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than August 21, 2008.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Steve Foley, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. George W. Carter, Sr., Mary Ann Carter, Charles W. Carter, Jr., 
Laurie C. Wilder, and related interests, all of Jackson, Georgia, as a 
group acting in concert to acquire voting shares of First Georgia 
Community Corp., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First 
Georgia Community Bank, all of Jackson, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Todd Offenbacker, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

[[Page 46006]]

    1. The Schifferdecker Limited Partnership, to acquire control of 
G.N. Bankshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of The 
Girard National Bank, all of Girard, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 1, 
2008.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E8-18107 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 9 -00 715-CV In r e M ic hae l P e r kins ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM T R A V IS C OU N T Y ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Waldrop and He nson Filed: De cembe r 31, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17789]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary

Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission


Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 552b of Title 5, 
United States Code, that a meeting of the John H. Chafee Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission will be held on 
Thursday, September 18, 2008.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Pub. L. 99-647. The 
purpose of the Commission is to assist federal, state and local 
authorities in the development and implementation of an integrated 
resource management plan for those lands and waters within the 
Corridor.
    The meeting will convene on September 18, 2008 at 9 a.m. at 
Banneker Industries, located at 582 Great Road, North Smithfield, RI 
for the following reasons:
    1. Approval of Minutes
    2. Chairman's Report
    3. Executive Director's Report
    4. Financial Budget
    5. Public Input
    It is anticipated that about thirty people will be able to attend 
the session in addition to the Commission members.
    Interested persons may make oral or written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made 
prior to the meeting to: Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John H. 
Chafee, Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission, 
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI 02895, Tel.: (401) 762-0250.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director of the Commission at the 
aforementioned address.

Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. E8-17789 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4186 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4186

To designate the United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, 
       as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border Station''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1996

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, 
       as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border Station''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border 
Station''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the border station referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kika de la Garza 
United States Border Station''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 5, 2010

d0302 

# Order

March 5, 2010

140234

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140234 COA: 287948 Wayne CC: 07-012211-FH TENORA BAYSO BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a sti pulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
#### NATIONAL HOME INSURANCE COMPANY (a Risk Retention Group), Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Thuan Tan NGUYEN and Hoa Tan Nguyen, et al., Defendants/Appellants.

No. 69931.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Oct. 29, 1996.

*893J.B. Carter, Kirkwood, for defendants/appellants.

William Sitzer, J. Dennis O’Leary, St. Louis, for plaintiff/respondent.

GRIMM, Judge.

Plaintiff sued defendants to confirm an arbitration award. The trial court granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment confirming the award and defendants appeal. We dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 84.04.

Rule 84.04(h) requires that all “statements of fact and argument shall have specific page references to the legal file or the transcript.” Defendants’ brief does not contain any page references.

Rule 84.04(d) requires that the points relied on “state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous.”

Defendants’ brief contains two points. They are: 1) “The trial court lacks jurisdiction as this arbitration is a part of a case in the United States District Court and therefore the trial court lacks jurisdiction over appellants. Jurisdiction, as a matter of fairness to the litigants, and in an attempt to avoid piecemeal litigation, must remain with the federal court”, and 2) “There are genuine issues of material fact, and therefore summary judgment is not appropriate.”

Neither point complies with Rule 84.04(d). They do not state “wherein and why” the actions of the trial court are erroneous. Compliance with Rule 84.04(d) is mandatory. *Mitchell v. Briscoe,*803 S.W.2d 617, 618 (Mo.App.E.D.1990).

Appeal dismissed.

CRAHAN, P.J., and HOFF, J., concur.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000681 22-APR-2015 09:25 AM
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Printing Components Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Herb Adams, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated this 13th
day of August, 2009.




HERB
      ADAMS
              Herb
      Adams
              Chief
      Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

__________________________________________________________________ No. DA 22 - 0378 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. RALPH DEAVILA, Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ **ORDER**

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, without objection and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 14, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2023

08/16/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0378
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DIBBLE, et al.,

Plaintiffs, Civil Action No.

 09-CV-13314

vs.

 HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH

SECURITY CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ [DE #63]

EMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S [DE #60]

SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE

On November 16, 2010, Plaintiffs filed an “Emergency Motion to Strike Defendant’s Second

Motion in Limine,” docket entry # 63. On November 17, 2010, Defendant filed a response. 

Plaintiffs did not file a reply.

The filing that is the subject of the emergency motion, “Defendant’s Additional Motion in

Limine,” docket entry # 60, complies with the 20-page limit set by E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(3)(A)). 

Further, nothing in the Court’s previous order granting an earlier request by Defendant for an

extension of the page limit for a previously filed motion in limine limited the number of motions in

limine that the parties were authorized to submit. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied. 

Plaintiffs are directed to file a response to “Defendant’s Additional Motion in Limine,” by

December 6, 2010. 

In addition, Defendants request costs and attorney fees related to responding to the motion,

1
citing inter alia Plaintiffs’ failure to seek concurrence in accordance with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a). 

Local Rule 11.1 states that for knowing violations of the the Local Rules, “[t]he procedures for

imposing sanctions and the nature of sanctions shall be as set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c).” The

federal rule requires that a motion for sanctions “must be made separately from any other motion.” 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). Defendant did not file a separate motion; it requested costs and fees

within its response to the emergency motion to strike. Accordingly, the request is denied without

prejudice. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 29, 2010 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

Flint, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 29, 2010.

s/Deborah J. Goltz 

DEBORAH J. GOLTZ

Case Manager

2