alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Missouri, et al., Appellants, v. Edwin FRANK, et al., Respondents.

No. 78107.

Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.

Jan. 23, 1996.

John A. Ross, County Counselor, Don R. Williams, Asst. County Counselor, St. Louis County, St. Louis, for appellants.

John G. Young, Jr., Charles F. Dufor, Cynthia N. Bitting, St. Louis, for respondents.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

The ruling of the trial court to prorate the real estate taxes assessed by a county between the landowner and the condemnor-county as of the date of the taking is affirmed. Discerning no jurisdictional value to publishing an opinion, this Court issues this summary order. *Rule 84.16(b).*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLM Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Xin Chen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |   

Dated this 7thday of July, 2009.

XIN CHENXin ChenChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer












---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18437]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1771-DR]


Illinois Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1771-DR), dated June 24, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: July 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Illinois is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 24, 2008.

    Greene County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidential 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-18437 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Thomas
J. Paulson, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its




consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: May
15, 2009


/s/ Thomas J.
      PaulsonThomas
      J. PaulsonChief
      Financial Officer
              (principal
      financial officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN H. BARTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-13750

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, 

and POSTMASTER GENERAL

JOHN E. POTTER,

Defendants.

____________________________/

JUDGMENT

On September 22, 2009, Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against Defendants complaining

about the treatment he has received as an employee of the United States Postal Service.

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 23, 2009, in which he alleges age

discrimination and retaliation in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

(“ADEA”) and harassment and hostile work environment. Defendants filed a motion to

dismiss and for summary judgment on August 11, 2010, which this Court granted in an

Opinion and Order entered on this date.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Plaintiff’s complaint is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DATE: February 10, 2011 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

BenjaminWhitfield, Jr., Esq.

Kenneth L. Shaitelman, Esq.

2:09-cv-13750-PJD-MKM Doc # 35 Filed 02/10/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 683
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4205

To amend title 49, United States Code, concerning employment standards

for airport security personnel.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Mr. KING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, concerning

employment standards for airport security personnel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Airport Security Per5 sonnel Standards Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS FOR AIRPORT SECURITY

7 PERSONNEL.

8 Section 44935(a) of title 49, United States Code, is

9 amended—
2

•HR 4205 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through

2 (5) as subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively;

3 (2) by striking ‘‘The Administrator’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘(1) The Administrator’’; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(2) Any standards for airport security personnel

7 prescribed under paragraph (1) shall include requirements

8 for law enforcement or military training.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CIVIL NO.09-1330 2 

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

REEDIE ANTHONY, 

Plaintiff(s), 

-VGROUPE ROBERT INC. & DAVID J. WELLMAN, 

Defendant(s). 

I 

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 

At a session of said court, held in the U.S. 

District Courthouse, City of Detroit, County 

of Wayne State of Michigan on October 13, 2010. 

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

The parties having stipulated to dismiss the above action with prejudice as 

set forth on the record, now therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. 

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

United States District Judge 

Dated: October 13, 2010 

ichael Sickles 


Attorney for Defendant(s)
#### Chauncey A. Frees, Respondent, v. Sol Bernstein, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobile Data Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Cozine, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Steven Cozine






Steven Cozine


Chief Executive Officer


March 17, 2011























CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mobile Data Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Belkis Jimenez Rivero, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




















/s/ Belkis Jimenez Rivero








Belkis Jimenez Rivero


Chief Financial Officer


March 17, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case Number 09-20421-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

 v.

D-2 NICKOL MAY JACKSON,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on December 22, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder pursuant to Defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on

December 23, 2009, recommending that this Court accept Defendant’s plea of guilty to count three

of the indictment. On December 23, 2009, a Rule 11 plea agreement [Dkt. # 31] was filed. As of

today’s date, the parties have not elected to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. The decision not to file objections to the report and recommendation releases the

Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 28] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty to count three of the indictment

is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 31] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: February 23, 2010
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on February 23, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       3,281,972
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                         80,522
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                           88,374
<EQUITIES>                                   147,280
<MORTGAGE>                                         0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             3,572,010
<CASH>                                        52,595
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           749,062
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        84,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             5,039,352
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            3,246,858
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          355,908
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         508
<OTHER-SE>                                 1,085,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5,039,352
<PREMIUMS>                                   973,611
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          191,901
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             5,695
<OTHER-INCOME>                                (1,867)
<BENEFITS>                                   716,033
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    3,987
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         313,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              143,839
<INCOME-TAX>                                  31,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          112,027
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 112,027
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   2.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             2,969,341
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          745,594
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                            (29,561)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                           139,073
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             282,134
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            3,246,858
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      (29,561) 
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7692

FLOYD JOYNER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHARON JONES, Clerk Isle of Wight Circuit Court; ANTOINETTE 

E. TUCKER, Office of the Public Defender,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:14-cv-01771-LO-MSN)

Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Joyner, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Joyner, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was filed on April 30, 2015, and

entered on the docket on May 1, 2015. The notice of appeal was 

filed on October 14, 2015. Because Joyner failed to file a 

timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening 

of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Joyner’s 

motions for default judgment and to amend and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL R. NEVAREZ, as Trustee of the

1010 S. Oregon Family Trust, in rem only,

GLORIA GONZALEZ, in rem only, and

IRENE JOHNSON a/k/a IRENE GONZALEZ

JOHNSON, in rem only

,

Appellants,

v.

THE CITY OF EL PASO,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00061

- CV

Appeal from the

327th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2011TX569)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant s and their sureties, if any, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5, for performance of the

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9 TH DAY OF MAY , 20 23

.

G INA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, J.J.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 02, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 02, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0068. AMY S THAL v. NANCY B. THAL, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN HUNTER ROOP et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV313132
#### CIVIL AGENCY, etc., v. KUHN et al.

No. 14394.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Orleans.

May 8, 1933.

For former opinion, see 145 So. 564.

Joseph A. Casey, of New Orleans, for appellant.

Montgomery, Jones & Kehl, and James J. Landry, all of New Orleans, for appellees.

WESTERFIELD, Judge.

Upon reconsideration we have concluded to affirm the judgment of the trial court in this matter, being of opinion, as was the trial judge, that the issue of fact involved must be resolved in the negative in view of the fact that the burden of proof concerning the validity of defendant’s signature rested upon plaintiff and appellant.

Our former decree is recalled and set aside, and it is now ordered that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Original decree recalled; judgment appealed from affirmed.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 41222 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JUAN DIEGO CAVAZOS

- GALLEGOS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:17

- CR

- 1161

- 1

Before SOUTHWICK, WILLETT, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Diego Cavazos

- Gallegos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cavazos

- Gallego s has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Cavazos

- Gallegos ’ s response . We concur with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-41222 Document: 00514520335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2018No. 17

- 41222

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appella te review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-41222 Document: 00514520335 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2018
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT OF

UNION SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Union Security Life Insurance Company of New York (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Manuel J. Becerra, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008



/s/ Manuel J. BecerraManuel J. BecerraPresident