alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

Power of Attorney 
 CHEN Haozhi, LIU
Guanqun and MA Fei (the “Principals”) hold 100% equity interests of Beijing Chukong Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), of which 45%m 45% and 10% is respectively held by CHEN Haozhi, LIU Guanqun and MA Fei. The
Principals agree to authorize Beijing Chukong Aipu Technology Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE” or the “Attorney”) to exercise the right of shareholders corresponding to their holding of equity interests in the Company, and
hereby irrevocably authorize the WFOE to exercise the rights as follows during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 The Principals authorize the WFOE to
exercise, on behalf of the Principals as holders of 100% equity interests of the Company, all rights of shareholder entitled to the Principals by law and under the Articles of the Company, including without limitation the right to call for
shareholder’s meeting, accept any notice regarding the convention of shareholder’s meeting and meeting agenda, attend shareholder’s meeting and exercise all voting rights as holders of 100% equity interests of the Company (including
acting as the proxy of the Principals to nominate and appoint the director, general manager, financial controller or other senior management of the Company, decide dividend distribution and any other matter), and to sell or transfer all equity
interests of the Company held by the Principals. 
 The Attorney may designate any individual appointed by its board of directors to exercise any of the
rights authorized by the Principals under this Agreement. 
 Unless the Business Operation Agreement jointly made by the Company, the Attorney and the
Principals is early terminated for any reason, this Power of Attorney will have a term as long as the term of the Business Operation Agreement commencing on the date hereof. Upon expiry hereof and at request of the WFOE, the Attorney will extend the
term hereof of validity hereof as requested by the WFOE. 
 Principals 
  

			
	CHEN Haozhi
		
	By:	 	/s/ CHEN Haozhi
	
	LIU Guanqun
		
	By:	 	/s/ LIU Guanqun
	
	MA Fei
		
	By:	 	/s/ MA Fei


			
		
	Attorney:	 	Beijing Chukong Aipu Technology Co., Ltd. (company seal)
	By:	 	CHEN Haozhi
		 	Legal Representative
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP07-62-000; CP07-63-000; CP07-64-000; CP07-65-000]

                    At the request of U.S. Representative Joe Pitts, representing the 16th Congressional District of Pennsylvania, staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will attend a meeting sponsored and moderated by the Congressman to discuss constituents' concerns about the proposed Sparrows Point LNG and Pipeline Project.[1] 

The meeting will be held on August 12, 2008, beginning at 7p.m. (EDT) at: Octorara High School Auditorium, 226 Highland Road, Atglen, PA 19310.

Please contact Congressman Pitts' district office at 610-444-4581 with any questions regarding this meeting.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             For additional information about the Project, please contact the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 502-8004.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-17879 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.3





STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-Q Report for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.,


Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer


Dated: November 22, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 154 (Friday, August 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1297-000]


Ashtabula Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

August 1, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Ashtabula Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 21, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ebadaeb9a8a4858782858eb89e9b9b84999fab8d8e9988c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1979483929ebfbdb8bfb482a4a1a1bea3a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a> 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18262 Filed 8-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  I, Gary
Spaniak, Chief Financial Officer of Classic Costume Company, Inc., (the
“Registrant”), certify that:
  1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;
  2.    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
  3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  4.    The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:
  (a)    designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  (b)    evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)    disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
  5.    The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of
directors:
  (a)    all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b)    any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
  May
      14, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Gary
      SpaniakGary
      SpaniakChief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45694-45695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18120]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1567]


Approval of Expansion of Subzone 161A and Expansion of 
Manufacturing Authority, Hospira, Inc. (Pharmaceutical Products), 
McPherson, KS

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners of Sedgwick, Kansas, 
grantee of FTZ 161, submitted an application to the Board for authority 
to expand the subzone and the scope of manufacturing authority under 
zone procedures at Subzone 161A at the Hospira, Inc., pharmaceutical 
facility in McPherson, Kansas, adjacent to the Wichita Customs and 
Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 41-2007, filed 8/23/07);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (72 FR 50326, 8/31/07), and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal as described 
in the application and Federal Register notice is in the public 
interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand the subzone and the scope of 
manufacturing authority under zone procedures for Subzone 161A is 
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
section 400.28.


[[Page 45695]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of July 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18120 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3635

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Allende Delgado-Ruiz, also known as * Northern District of Iowa.

Juan Ruiz, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 7, 2007

Filed: March 15, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Allende Delgado-Ruiz (Ruiz) appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed

upon his guilty plea to illegally reentering the United States after having been

removed subsequent to a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and

(b)(1). The court sentenced Ruiz to 41 months’ imprisonment and 3 years’ supervised

release. Ruiz’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.
-2-

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that enhancing Ruiz’s sentence based on

prior convictions (for which he has already been punished) resulted in double

punishment. 

We reject this argument. See United States v. Thomas, 930 F.2d 12, 14 (8th

Cir. 1991) (use of prior crimes to enhance sentence does not violate Double Jeopardy

Clause). Further, having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v.

Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
EXHIBIT
32.1 SARBANES OXLEY SECTION 906
  CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Extreme Home
Staging,  Inc. (the “Company”)  certifies, pursuant to her knowledge,
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information
contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Dated:  March 28,
2008
 /s/ Milka
Fixler
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3

v. NO. 32,495 4 GUILLERMO VELASQUEZ, 5 Defendant-Appellee. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 7 Samuel L. Winder, District Judge 8 Gary K. King, Attorney General 9 Olga Serifimova 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 for Appellant 12 Bennett J. Baur, Acting Chief Public Defender 13 B. Douglas Wood III, Assi stant Appellate Defender 14 Santa Fe, NM 15 for Appellee 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION 17 VANZI, Judge. 182 {1} The State is appeali ng from a district court ruling that a 1999 prior 1 misdemeanor driving while intoxicated (DWI) conviction could not be used to 2 enhance a current conviction because Defe ndant had not been represented by counsel 3 in the 1999 proceeding. [RP 77] Our second calendar notice proposed to affirm. The 4 State has responded with a memorandum inopposition. Not persuaded by the State’s 5 arguments, we affirm. 6 {2} In State v. Aragon , 1997-NMSC-062, ¶ 8, 124 N.M. 399, 951 P.2d 616, our 7 Supreme Court stated the following. 8 Uncounseled convictions that result in a sentence of imprisonment, 9 whether actually served or suspende d, violate the Sixth Amendment right 10 to counsel as applied to the stat es through the Fourteenth Amendment. 11 {3} In this case, contrary to the State’s assertion [MIO 3-4], the 1999 judgment 12 contained a term of imprisonment, whic h was suspended with conditions. [RP 57-62] 13 Accordingly, it could not be used to e nhance Defendant’s sentence unless he had 14 counsel or had waived counsel, and the St ate concedes that the 1999 conviction was 15 uncounseled. [MIO 5] Nevertheless, in its memorandum in opposition, the State 16 argues [MIO 5-6] that the above-quoted language is dicta, because the defendant in 17 Aragon received a fine and not a suspended sentence. See Aragon , 1997-NMSC-062, 18 ¶ 9. However, we consider the above-quoted language to be controlling because it 19 draws a legal boundary for the requirement of counsel, and the fact that the judgment 20 in that case fell on the other side of thatboundary does not affect the substance and 213 impact of the rule. See Alexander v. Delgado , 1973-NMSC-030, ¶ 8, 84 N.M. 717, 1 507 P.2d 778 (noting that our Supreme Court precedent controls). In other words, it 2 is not dicta. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. 3

{4} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

__________________________________ 5 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

_________________________________ 8 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 9

_________________________________ 10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 11
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4333 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4333

 To prohibit smoking in any transportation facility for which Federal 
                   financial assistance is provided.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 30, 1996

Mr. Lewis of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit smoking in any transportation facility for which Federal 
                   financial assistance is provided.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Smoke-Free Transportation Facilities 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SMOKING IN TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES.

    (a) Smoking Prohibition.--As a condition of the receipt of Federal 
financial assistance, the Secretary of Transportation shall require 
that the owner or operator of a transportation facility take such 
actions as may be necessary to prohibit smoking in any indoor portion 
of the facility that is accessible to the general public.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Smoking.--The term ``smoking'' includes the smoking of 
        cigarettes, cigars, and pipes.
            (2) Transportation facility.--The term ``transportation 
        facility'' includes any airport terminal, bus terminal, subway 
        station, and train station.
    (c) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue regulations to carry 
out this section.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday August 29, 2008.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Staff Assistant.

[FR Doc. E8-18347 Filed 8-5-08; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4119

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, as the ‘‘William Augustus

Bootle Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1996

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia,

as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, shall

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle

7 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4119 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec5 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

6 Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States

7 Courthouse’’.

Æ