alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

Great Lakes Aviation,Ltd.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statementsNo. 33-90926 on Form S-8, No. 333-75706 on Form S-8, and No. 333-38338 on Form S-3 of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. of our report dated March 11, 2005, relating to the balance sheets of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, andthe related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31,2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

 

Our report datedMarch 11, 2005, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company has suffered significant losses and has liabilities in excess of assets, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financialstatements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty. 

 

Denver, Colorado 

March 30, 2005
#### John B. HUTTO, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 8643.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 7, 1938.

Grady Gillon, of Macon, Ga., for appellant.

T. Hoyt Davis, U. S. Atty., and John P. C.owart, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Macon, Ga.

Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 398

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of

1991 to provide for greater disclosure of lending to small businesses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 to provide for greater disclosure

of lending to small businesses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Lend5 ing Disclosure Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. GREATER DISCLOSURE OF LENDING TO SMALL

7 BUSINESSES.

8 Section 122(c) of Federal Deposit Insurance Cor9 poration Improvement Act of 1991 (12 U.S.C. 1817 nt.)

10 is amended—
2

•HR 398 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’;

2 (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘to small busi3 nesses.’’ and inserting ‘‘to small businesses, and the

4 total number and aggregate dollar amount of appli5 cations received for such loans, in each of the follow6 ing categories (as determined on the basis of the an7 nual sales of the small business):

8 ‘‘(A) Businesses with annual sales of less

9 than $100,000.

10 ‘‘(B) Businesses with annual sales greater

11 than or equal to $100,000 but less than

12 $250,000.

13 ‘‘(C) Businesses with annual sales greater

14 than or equal to $250,000 but less than

15 $500,000.

16 ‘‘(D) Businesses with annual sales greater

17 than or equal to $500,000 but less than

18 $1,000,000.

19 ‘‘(E) Businesses with annual sales greater

20 than or equal to $1,000,000 but less than

21 $10,000,000.’’; and

22 (3) by adding at the end the following new

23 paragraph:

24 ‘‘(4) The total number and aggregate dollar

25 amount of commercial loans and commercial real es-
3

•HR 398 IH

1 tate loans, and the total number and aggregate dol2 lar amount of applications received for such loans, in

3 each of the following categories:

4 ‘‘(A) Minority-owned businesses.

5 ‘‘(B) Startup businesses.

6 ‘‘(C) Businesses in operation for less than

7 1 year (other than startup businesses).’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44984-44985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17635]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-934-000 ]


Locust Ridge II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

July 25, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Locust Ridge, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an

[[Page 44985]]

accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is August 14, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public 
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85c3c0d7c6caebe9ecebe0d6f0f5f5eaf7f1c5e3e0f7e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0868592838faeaca9aea593b5b0b0afb2b480a6a5b2a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-17635 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of TIAA-CREF U.S. Real
Estate Fund I, L.P. (the Fund) do hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.

|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Scott C. Evans                     
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                    |  | Scott C. Evans                         
|                    |  | Principal Executive Officer            
|                   
|                   
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Glenn A. MacFarlane                
|                    |  | Glenn A. MacFarlane                    
|                    |  | Principal Financial and Accounting     
|                    |  | Officer                                
|                    |  | TIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P. and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Frederick ECCHER, Defendant/Appellant. Frederick ECCHER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 66848, 68045.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 19, 1995.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

*914Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Kocot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury for possession of a controlled substance, § 195.202.2, RSMol994. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury’s assessment to a prison term of six years. Defendant also appeals the denial, for untimely filing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Defendant’s Rule 29.25 motion was properly denied; the time limits contained in Rule 29.15 are valid, reasonable, and mandatory. *State v. Stewart,*811 S.W.2d 805, 809 (Mo.App.1991). We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error on direct appeal are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4187 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4187

   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Lincoln 
 National Historic Trail as a component of the National Trails System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1996

  Mr. Weller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Lincoln 
 National Historic Trail as a component of the National Trails System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)) 
is amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end thereof:
            ``(  ) The Lincoln National Historic Trail, a trail of 
        approximately 350 miles extending from Lake Michigan to the 
        Mississippi River, as generally described in `The Proposal' in 
        the Department of the Interior report entitled `Illinois Trail, 
        National Trail Feasibility Study and Environmental Assessment', 
        dated September 1987, with an extension of the water route down 
        the Mississippi River to connect with the Lewis and Clark 
        National Historic Trail near Wood River, Illinois, and with an 
        extension of the water route down the Sangamon River from 
        Beardstown to Springfield. A map generally depicting the route 
        shall be on file and available for public inspection in the 
        Office of the Director of the National Park Service, 
        Washington, District of Columbia. The trail shall be 
        administered by the Secretary of the Interior.''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Overton 

Argued at Norfolk, Virginia 

KENNETH A. GORE 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* BY 

v. Record No. 1776-97-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON 

 JUNE 23, 1998 

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PORTSMOUTH 

Dennis F. McMurran, Judge 

 Frederick M. Quayle (Elizabeth B. Fitzwater, 

on brief), for appellant. 

 Leah A. Darron, Assistant Attorney General 

(Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), 

for appellee. 

 Kenneth A. Gore (defendant) was convicted in a bench trial 

of possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a 

felony, in violation of Code § 18.2-308.2. On appeal, he 

contends the evidence was insufficient to show his constructive 

possession of the firearm. Because we find the evidence was 

sufficient, we affirm. 

 The parties are fully conversant with the record in the case 

and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential 

value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. 

 "Proof that appellant possessed the gun . . . either 

actually or constructively, was sufficient to support his 

conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon." 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

Archer v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 1, 11-12, 492 S.E.2d 826, 831 

(1997) (citing Blake v. Commonwealth, 15 Va. App. 706, 708-09, 

427 S.E.2d 219, 220-21 (1993)). For a conviction based upon 

constructive possession to stand, "the Commonwealth must point to 

evidence of acts, statements, or conduct of the accused or other 

facts or circumstances which tend to show that the [accused] was 

aware of both the presence and character of the [item] and that 

it was subject to his dominion and control." Powers v. 

Commonwealth, 227 Va. 474, 476, 316 S.E.2d 739, 740 (1984). 

 Defendant analogizes his case with that of Hancock v. 

Commonwealth, 21 Va. App. 466, 465 S.E.2d 138 (1995). In 

Hancock, the defendant sat in the back seat of a car and the gun 

was found underneath the seat directly in front of him. The 

evidence showed that if Hancock had not looked down under that 

seat, he would not have necessarily known about the gun. Because 

the Commonwealth did not exclude that possibility, his conviction 

was reversed. 

 In the instant case, defendant was driving the car when it 

was pulled over. The car was registered to his wife, only they 

possessed keys and only he and his wife ever drove the car. The 

handgun was found in the glove compartment. Defendant reached 

into the glove compartment to retrieve the registration while the 

gun was in that glove compartment. He admits he saw the gun and 

yet said nothing to the police officer. At that moment he had 

both knowledge of the gun and exercised dominion and control over 
- 3 - 

it, which is what the statute requires. See Code § 18.2-308.2. 

 Because the Commonwealth proved defendant constructively 

possessed the firearm, his conviction is affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45695]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18121]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1568]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status, Baker Hughes, Inc., 
(Barite Milling), Morgan City, LA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, the Port of South Louisiana Commission, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 124, has made application to the Board for authority 
to establish a special-purpose subzone at the barite milling facility 
of Baker Hughes, Inc., located in Morgan City, Louisiana (FTZ Docket 2-
2008, filed 1/28/08);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (73 FR 5175, 1/28/08); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds the requirements of the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
would be in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to barite milling at the facility of Baker 
Hughes, Inc., located in Morgan City, Louisiana (Subzone 124M), as 
described in the application and Federal Register notice, and subject 
to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of July 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18121 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innolog Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, William P. Danielczyk, Executive Chairman of the Board and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael J. Kane, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/William P. DanielczykWilliam P. DanielczykPrincipal Executive OfficerMay 23,2011/s/Michael J. KaneMichael J. KanePrincipal Accounting OfficerMay 23, 2011
Exhibit 32

          Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                     Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     Dana C.  Gavenda,  Chief  Executive  Officer and President of FSB Community
Bankshares, Inc., (the "Company") and Kevin D. Maroney, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  each certify in his capacity as an
officer of the Company that he has reviewed  the  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended  September 30, 2009 (the "Report") and that to the best of
his knowledge:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





Date:  November 13, 2009                   /s/ Dana C. Gavenda
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Dana C. Gavenda
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  November 13, 2009                   /s/ Kevin D. Maroney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Kevin D. Maroney
                                           Executive Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET FOR THE MONTHS OF JANUARY AND

 FEBRUARY, 2010, BEFORE THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN*

Listed below are the cases on this Court's trial docket for the months of November and

December, 2009. Counsel will be notified when their case reaches No. 5. After such

notice, counsel should be prepared to begin trial any time on 48 hours notice. It is

counsel's responsibility in all cases after they have been so notified to contact my clerk,

Marilyn Orem, at 234-5147, to ascertain the status of the trial docket. Unless otherwise

notified, this Court commences trial at 8:45 a.m. PLEASE BE PROMPT!

1. 08-14136 SHAKOOR V. EVANS, ET.AL

2. 08-14318 CONOCOPHILLIPS V. CONVENIENCE DEPOT, ET.AL

3. 08-14922 FIALKA-FELDMAN V. OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

4. 08-14117 SMITH V. MICHIGAN TUBE SWAGERS & FABRICATORS

5. 09-10981 PFISTER V. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ET.AL

6. 09-11648 EDMUNDS V. BOARD OF CONTROL OF EASTERN MI. UNIVERSITY

7. 09-11366 N&W COMMODITIES V. USA

8. 09-11949 KAID V. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: December 1, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 1, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

*PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT TRIAL WILL NOT BEGIN BEFORE THE FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE.

IF THERE IS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PENDING, FINAL PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE WILL BE RESCHEDULED APPROXIMATELY 10 DAYS AFTER ANY

DECISION ON SUCH MOTION.

2:09-cv-11366-PJD-RSW Doc # 11 Filed 12/01/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 93
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FORSTER MOORE,

Petitioner, Case No. 09-13569

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

ENFORCEMENT, et al.,

Respondents.

______________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT

Before the court is Petitioner Forster Moore’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed

September 10, 2009. The government submitted a response on November 2, 2009. Moore is

challenging his detention by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”)

pursuant to a final order of removal. On January 22, 2010, the government filed a motion to

dismiss the petition as moot, because Moore was removed to Ghana on November 16, 2009, and

is no longer detained by ICE. 

Because the court is no longer able to grant the relief requested by Moore, his petition is

moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DENIED AS MOOT and the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: January 26, 2010

5:09-cv-13569-JCO-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 01/26/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 34
-2-

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of

record on this date, January 26, 2010, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager

5:09-cv-13569-JCO-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 01/26/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 35