alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45756]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER97-4468-001]


Puget Sound Energy, Inc; Notice of Filing

July 31, 2008.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2008, Puget Sound Energy, Inc. filed 
a voluntary refund report.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3e5e6f1e0eccdcfcacdc6f0d6d3d3ccd1d7e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="460003140509282a2f282315333636293432062023342568212930">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 pm Eastern Time on August 11, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-18008 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17887]

[[Page 45475]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,605]

CPU2, LLC, Arden, NC; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on June 26, 2008 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of CPU2, LLC, 
Arden, North Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of July 2008.
 Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-17887 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Randall E. BURNS, Appellant.

No. WD 50472.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 6, 1996.

Robert G. Duncan, Kansas City, for appellant.

William P. Devoy, Pros. Atty., Linn County, Brookfield, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randall E. Burns appeals his conviction of the class B misdemeanor of driving while intoxicated under § 577.010, RSMo 1994.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Roy J. KINNEAR, Respondent.

No. 8811.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 5, 1938.

James W. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Int. Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

H. B. Jones, of Seattle, Wash., for respondent.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of counsel for petitioner, consented to by counsel for respondent, ordered petition to review herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of- this court in this cause issue forthwith.
Exhibit 10.13


Creafi Online Media Terms


Creafi-Online-Media.com shall remit payment to publishers
in Right Media within 35 days from the end of the month, and to publishers in Appnexus within 65 days from the end of the month
once the invoice has been received. All payments will be based on Creafi-Online-Media.com ad server statistics. Creafi-Online-Media.com
shall pay the agreed percentage of revenue share after discounting $0,015 CPM ad serving cost. If publisher cost eCPM is less than
0,035 before deducting $0,015 serving fee, no payment will be done, meaning a publisher needs to have a minimum 0,05 cost eCPM
to get paid. If the publisher cost eCPM is over 0,08, no serving fee will be applied. We only accept invoices (and remit payments)
with a minimum amount of $100.00 (USD) if preferred payment method is via PayPal, or $1,000.00 (USD) if payment method is via wire
transfer. Lower amounts will be accumulated to the following calendar month. Stats and numbers are verified by various systems,
no payments will be made to publishers if an alert is received from one of our systems related to suspicious traffic until the
stats are checked and verified and no evidence is found to be fraudulent.
2:09-cv-11529-NGE-VMM Doc # 15-2 Filed 06/16/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 167
Filed 11/8/23 In re Garza CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re
RUBEN GARZA,

On Habeas Corpus. F08 6882 (Merced Super. Ct. Nos. 23

- CR

- 02218,

20

- CR

- 03754 )


### OPINION

THE COURT  ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus.
Ruben Garza , in pro. per., for Petitioner. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Respondent.

- ooOoo

Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the doctrine of constructive filing. ( In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 72 , 81

– 82.) Respondent filed a response to the request stating that petitioner’s “ allegations appear to be sufficient to make a prima facie showing for relief from default under the Sixth Amendment right to
counsel. ( Roe v. Flores

- Ortega (2000) 528 U.S. 470, 480.) ” Accordingly, we conclude petitioner is entitled to relief.

 Before Poochigian , Acting P. J., Smith , J. and DeSantos , J.2 DISPOSITIO N Petitioner is granted leave to file a notice of appeal on or before 60 days from the
date of this order in Merced County Superior Court action Nos. 23

- CR

- 02218 and
20

- CR

- 03754. Let a writ of mandate issue directing the Clerk of the Merced County Superio r Court to file said request in its action Nos. 23

- CR

- 02218 and 20

- CR

- 03754 , to treat them as timely filed, and to proceed with the preparation of the record on appeal in accordance with the applicable rules of the California Rules of Court if the clerk of that court receives said request on or before 60 days of the date of this order. This opinion is final forthwith as to this court. To the extent petitioner seeks to raise the sentencing claims stated in the petition for writ of habeas corpus attached to his request to file a notice of appeal under the constructive filing doctrine, this court notes the potential to raise these claims in his direct appeal. ( In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 .) The court expresses no opinion as to
the merits of those c laims.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 418 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Private Calendar No. 1
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 418

                          [Report No. 104-358]

                For the relief of Arthur J. Carron, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           November 28, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Arthur J. Carron, Jr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of title 31, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to a claim by Arthur 
J. Carron, Jr., of Bark River, Michigan, for amounts due to him by the 
Department of the Navy. The amounts due are represented by the 
following checks that were received but not negotiated by Arthur J. 
Carron, Jr.:
            (1) Treasury check number 2,831,843, dated October 18, 
        1966, in the amount of $10,850.74 for salary and expenses.
            (2) Treasury check number 10,445,856, dated January 29, 
        1971, in the amount of $1,361.00 for salary and expenses.
            (3) Treasury check number 71,681,041, dated April 1, 1971, 
        in the amount of $562.25 for retirement pay.

SEC. 2. DEALINE.

    Section 1 shall apply only if Arthur J. Carron, Jr., or his 
authorized representative, submits a claim pursuant to such section 
before the expiration of the 3-month period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                     

                                                 Private Calendar No. 1

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 418

                          [Report No. 104-358]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                For the relief of Arthur J. Carron, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 28, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Joseph Whiting,

Petitioner,

v.

United States of America,

Respondent.

 /

Case No. 06-20465

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO AMEND 

AND ORDERING GOVERNMENT TO RESPOND [2706]

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's motion to amend his § 2255

petition. Motions to amend § 2255 motions are governed by the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Clark v. United States, 764 F.3d 653, 661 (6th Cir. 2014). (Petitioner's motion

is not a second or successive petition because it was filed "before the adjudication of the

initial § 2255 motion [was] complete." Id. at 658.) 

Petitioner filed his motion to amend ten months after his first filed his original motion

and six months after the Government's response. Accordingly, he is not entitled to an

amendment "as a matter of course" and must seek the leave of Court. Fed. R. Civ. P.

15(a). "The court should freely give leave to amend when justice so requires." Fed. R. Civ.

P. 15(a)(1)(2). "Denial may be appropriate, however, where there is 'undue delay, bad faith

or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by

amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of

allowance of the amendment, futility of the amendment, etc.' " Morse v. McWhorter, 290

F.3d 795, 800 (6th Cir. 2002) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). The

2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM Doc # 2710 Filed 08/10/15 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 19565
Court has determined that these circumstances do not apply and GRANTS Petitioner's

motion to amend.

According to Local Rule 15.1, Petitioner should have attached his proposed amended

§ 2255 motion as an exhibit to his motion to amend. Instead, Petitioner filed his amended

§ 2255 motion as a separate document. (Dkt. 2707.) This is not a basis for denial. The

Court deems Petitioner's amended § 2255 motion to have been filed the date that this order

issues. Furthermore, to the extent necessary, the Court finds that Petitioner's amended §

2255 motion relates back to the date his original § 2255 motion was filed under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c)(1)(B).

Petitioner's amended § 2255 motion adds a new claim that his appellate counsel was

ineffective for failing to raise a claim on appeal that Petitioner's sentence on Count 13 of

the indictment violated Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). The Government is

ordered to respond to this new claim on or before August 24, 2015. Petitioner shall file a

reply on or before September 7, 2015.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: August 10, 2015

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on August 10, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol J. Bethel 

Case Manager

2

2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM Doc # 2710 Filed 08/10/15 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 19566
U.S. Geothermal Inc.: Exhibit 10.2 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





AMENDMENT 
TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

      THIS AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is effective as of March 31, 2014 (the “Effective
Date”), by and between U.S. Geothermal Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and Jonathan Zurkoff (“Employee”). 

RECITALS 

      WHEREAS, the Company and
Employee entered into an Employment Agreement with a term from December 31, 2010
until March 31, 2013 (the “Agreement”). 

     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee
entered into an amendment extending the Agreement until March 31, 2014 (the
“Extension”). 

      WHEREAS, the Company and
Employee desire to amend and extend the Agreement on the terms and conditions
set forth below.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual covenants contained in the Agreement and this Amendment, the
parties hereby agree as follows: 

      1. Title. Section 1 of
the Agreement is hereby amended to reflect that the Employee is employed as the
Executive Vice President, Finance.

      2. Term. The term of the
Agreement as set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement, is hereby extended and
will remain in full force and effect until March 31, 2015.

      3. Expenses. Section 6 of
the Agreement will be amended by the addition of the follow provision at the end
of the second sentence thereof: 

“and reimbursement by
the Company will be made as soon as administratively practicable thereafter but
in no event later than the earlier of (i) three (3) months after the date of
termination and (ii) and no later than the end of the calendar year in which the
expense was incurred.” 

      4. Termination Payment under
Section 8.4. The second sentence of Section 8.4 of the Agreement is hereby
amended and restated as follows: “Any payments made under this Section 8.4, in
all events, will be paid on the 30th day following of the date of termination.”


      5. Savings Clause. Except
as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. 

[signature page follows]

1




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned have executed this Amendment on April 7, 2014. 

U.S. Geothermal Inc. a Delaware corporation 

	By:	
      /s/ Dennis J. Gilles
	 
	Name: 	Dennis J. Gilles 	 
	
      Title: 
	
      Chief Executive Officer 
	 


SIGNED by the Employee in the presence of: 

	/s/ Kerry D.
      Hawkley 	 	/s/
      Jonathan Zurkoff 
	Witness 	 	Jonathan Zurkoff 
	  	 	  
	  	 	  
	  	 	  
	Kerry D.
Hawkley	 	  
	Printed Name of Witness 	 	  


2
LINCOLN SNACKS COMPANY

                  INDEX TO FORM 10-K AMENDMENT



                                                  PAGE


Explanatory Note                                        1

Signatures                                              2

<PAGE>

                        EXPLANATORY NOTE


     This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this "Amendment") to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1996
(the "Original Report") amends Part IV of the Original Report which is
amended as follows:



1.   Part IV        Item 14 (Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
                    Reports on Form 8-K)



     This Amendment No. 1 adds as Exhibit 23.1 an updated consent from
Arthur Andersen LLP, the Company's independent public accountants.

<PAGE>

                           SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this
16th day of April, 1997.

                         LINCOLN SNACKS COMPANY
                              (Registrant)



                         By:   /s/ Karen Brenner                 
                               Karen Brenner
                               Chairman of the Board and 
                               Chief Executive Officer
                               (Principal Executive Officer)



                         By:   /s/ Kristine A. Crabs            
                              Kristine A. Crabs
                              Vice President-Chief Financial Officer, 
                              Treasurer and Secretary 
                              (Principal Financial Officer 
                              and Principal Accounting Officer)
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934**

 

I,Raymond A. Link, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of FEI Company;and

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date:  March 14, 2008 |                |
|---------------------------------|---------------------|
|                            |                |
| By:                             | /s/ RAYMOND A. LINK |   |
| Raymond A. Link                 |                |
| Executive Vice President and    |                |
| Chief Financial Officer         |                |
|                                 |                     |  |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:August
                    13, 2007
                /s/
                    Zhiguang ZhangBy:Zhiguang
                    ZhangIts:Chief
                    Executive Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hong Zhao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 24, 2010
/s/  Hong ZhaoBy:  Hong ZhaoIts:  Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WebSafety, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rowland W. Day II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:           /s/ Rowland W. DayII


Rowland W. Day II


Principal Executive Officer





Dated:  August 19, 2011





This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to WebSafety, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.