alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{34565/1/DT785229.DOCX;1} 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

IN RE: REFRIGERANT COMPRESSORS 

ANTITRUST LITIGATION 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS 

______________________________________ 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 2:09-md-2042 

MDL No. 2042 

Honorable Sean F. Cox 

 STIPULATED ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

SUBMIT INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND TO ANSWER THE 

DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ 

SECOND AMENDED MASTER AMENDED COMPLAINT 

This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties as evidenced 

by the signatures of their counsel below; and 

the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises hereof: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

1. Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America shall have 

until September 16, 2013 to answer the Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Master 

Amended Complaint (Doc. #304). 

2. Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, and Direct 

Purchaser Plaintiffs shall have until September 16, 2013 to submit their Initial Disclosures. 

Dated: August 29, 2013 s/ Sean F. Cox 

 Sean F. Cox 

 U. S. District Judge 

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 397 Filed 08/29/13 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 9138
{34565/1/DT785229.DOCX;1} 2 

Stipulated to and approved by: 

Dated: August __, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ David H. Fink (with consent) 

David H. Fink (P28235) 

Darryl Bressack (P67820) 

Fink & Associates Law 

100 West Long Lake Road; Suite 111 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

(248) 971-2501 

dfink@finkandassociateslaw.com 

/s/ E. Powell Miller (with consent) 

E. Powell Miller (P39487) 

Casey A. Fry (P72332) 

The Miller Law Firm, P.C. 

950 W. University Drive; Suite 300 

Rochester, MI 48307 

(248) 841-2200 

epm@millerlawpc.com 

Interim Lead Counsel for Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs

 

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 397 Filed 08/29/13 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 9139
{34565/1/DT785229.DOCX;1} 3 

/s/ Fred K. Herrmann _____ 

Fred K. Herrmann (P49519) 

Matthew L. Powell (P69186) 

Kerr, Russell and Weber, PLC 

500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 2500 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 961-0200 

fkh@krwlaw.com 

mlp@krwlaw.com 

Jeffrey L. Kessler 

A. Paul Victor 

David Greenspan 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

 200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166 

(212) 294-4698 

jkessler@winston.com 

pvictor@winston.com 

dgreenspan@winston.com 

Counsel for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and 

Panasonic Corporation of North America

 

2:09-md-02042-SFC Doc # 397 Filed 08/29/13 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 9140
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

 SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 09-13734

MARY VIED, ET.AL,

Plaintiff(s),

-vCONTINENTAL TIRE NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said court, held in the

 United States Courthouse, in the City of

 Detroit, State of Michigan, on September 28, 2009.

 

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court having issued an Order to Show Cause for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction and the Plaintiffs having filed a response, therefore;

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction be and the same is hereby SET ASIDE.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: September 28, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on September 28, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-13734-PJD-DAS Doc # 7 Filed 09/28/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 322
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDI LI,

Petitioner,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 13

- 74304 Agency No. A201

- 057

- 044

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 14, 2016 **

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Sandi Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 21 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 13

- 74304

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual
findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations
created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th
Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies as to whether Li’s family continued attending an
unregistered church after his arrest, and on inconsistencies as to t he issuance of a letter from Li’s pastor in China and Li’s notarial certificate of his birth. See id. at
1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of
circumstances”). Li’s explanations for these inconsistencies do not compel a

contr ary result. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In the
absence of credible testimony, Li’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.
See Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).
Substantial evidence also supports th e agency’s denial of Li’s CAT claim

because it was based on the same evidence found not credible and the record does
not otherwise compel the finding that it is more likely than not Li would be

tortured if returned to China. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at 1048

- 49.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4663

)

THE UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, )

GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, )

CREDITORS, TRUSTEES, OR )

OTHER CLAIMANTS CLAIMING BY, )

THROUGH, UNDER, OR AGAINST )

LEE PARKER GILMORE A/K/A LEE )

GILMORE A/K/A SUSAN LEE )

PARKER A/K/A SUSAN LEE PARKER )

GILMORE BRYANT A/K/A SUSAN LEE )

PARKER GILMORE BRYANT, )

DECEASED, )

)

Respondents. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed August 23, 2019.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit 

Court for Lee County; Keith R. Kyle, 

Judge.

Adam M. Topel and Tricia J. Duthiers 

of Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, 

Miami, for Petitioner.

Erik Johanson and David S. Jennis 

of Jennis Law Firm, Tampa, for 

Respondents.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM.

Denied. 

LaROSE, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7174

AHOTO TAYSIR MULAZIM, a/k/a Harold Carpenter, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

KEVIN CANADA; JASON HILLYARD; ANTONIO JOHNSON; KHALID MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Antonio Waddler; LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON; CHRISTOPHER TINKER; ARTHUR D. NEWBY; DAMIEON CARTER; DENNIS BOYD, Plaintiffs,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE; GENE M. JOHNSON; LINDA SHEAR, Head Dietician, Virginia Department of Corrections; DAN BRAXTON, Chief Warden; JOHN ARMENTROUT, Assistant Warden of Operations, Red Onion; R. W. FLEMING, Chief of Security, Red Onion; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTIGATOR YATES; L. MULLINS, Treatment Program Supervisor, Red Onion; V. PHIPPS, Director of Nursing, Red Onion; D. MCKNIGHT; P. SAUL, Human Rights Advocate, Red Onion; A. FLEENOR, Human Rights Advocate, Red Onion; RICHARD A. YOUNG, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-557-7)
Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 200223 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ahoto Taysir Mulazim, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ahoto Taysir Mulazim appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). Because Mulazim may cure any deficiency by filing an amended complaint, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the judgment is not a final, appealable order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17906]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0202] (formerly Docket No. 2008N-0009)

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Customer/Partner Service Surveys

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Customer/Partner Service Surveys'' 
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information 
Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of April 10, 2008 
(73 FR 19510), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assignedOMB control number 0910-0360. 
The approval expires on July 31, 2011. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: July 30, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-17906 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

FRANCIS A. SHARRAK,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-20272

ORDER ADJOURNING HEARING AND STAYING SENTENCING DEADLINES

On June 7, 2011, the court held a hearing on Defendant Francis A. Sharrak’s

intent to represent himself for purposes of sentencing. Due to Defendant’s unexpected

movement between facilities and his lack of medication, the court will adjourn the

hearing until June 30, 2011, to allow Defendant additional time to consult with attorney

Margaret Raben, his advisory counsel. Additionally, the court will stay all other

proceeding dates relating to objections to the presentence report, memoranda, and the

sentencing hearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant’s representation during

sentencing is ADJOURNED until June 30, 2011, at 11:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other dates previously set in this case are

STAYED. A revised schedule will issue upon completion of the adjourned hearing.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 10, 2011

2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 135 Filed 06/10/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3764
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, June 10, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\09-20272.SHARRAK.Adjourn.Hearing.nkt.wpd

2:09-cr-20272-RHC-VMM Doc # 135 Filed 06/10/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3765
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sharon
M. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





By:   /s/
Sharon M. Lynch


Sharon
M. Lynch


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Accounting Officer





Dated:
October 23, 2008
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROADSHIPS HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Michael Nugent
 Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer
  Date: November 15, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

# AGENCY:

President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities (PCPID); Administration for Children and Families; Department of Health and Human Services.

# ACTION:

Notice of Quarterly Meeting.

# DATES:

February 15, 2008, from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. EST.  The meeting will be conducted via conference call and will be open to the public using the dial-in information provided below.

# ADDRESSES:

The conference call may be accessed on the date and time indicated by dialing 888-677-5720, passcode: 1397797.

*Agenda:*                         PCPID will meet to finalize the 2007 Report to the President and to hear a briefing on the final report of the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Advisory Panel.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sally D. Atwater, Executive Director, President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities, The Aerospace Center, Second Floor, West, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447. Telephone:  202-619-0634, Fax:  202-205-9591. E-mail:                         *satwater@acf.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

PCPID acts in an advisory capacity to the President and the Secretary of Health and Human Services on a broad range of topics relating to programs, services and supports for persons with intellectual disabilities. PCPID, by Executive Order, is responsible for evaluating the adequacy of current practices in programs, services and supports for persons with intellectual disabilities, and for reviewing legislative proposals that impact the quality of life experienced by citizens with intellectual disabilities and their families.

Dated: January 25, 2008.

Sally D. Atwater,

Executive Director, President's Committee for People with Intellectual Disabilities.

 [FR Doc. E8-1809 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Donald H. JENSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20180.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

Feb. 6, 1996.

*865Bruce H. Galloway, Asst. Public Defender, Springfield, for appellant.

Thomas E. Mountjoy, Prosecuting Atty;, Robert V. Pranson, Asst. Prosecuting Atty., Greene County, Springfield, for respondent.

PARRISH, Judge.

Donald H. Jenson (defendant) appeals convictions for driving while intoxicated, § 577.010, RSMo 1986, and careless and imprudent driving, § 804.010, RSMo Supp.1991. This court affirms.

Defendant attempts to present two points relied on. They state:

> I. The trial court erred in entering its judgment of conviction for DWI because the evidence was not sufficient to establish [defendant’s] intoxication.

> II. The trial court erred in convicting the [defendant] of careless and imprudent driving because the information did not by any reasonable construction charge the offense of which the [defendant] was convicted and jeopardized the substantial rights of the [defendant].

Rule 30.06(d) requires, “The points relied on shall state briefly and concisely what actions or rulings of the court are sought to be reviewed and wherein and why they are claimed to be erroneous.... ”

Point I does not advise “wherein and why” the evidence was not sufficient to establish that defendant was intoxicated. It is similar to the points declared defective in *State v. Flemming,*855 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Mo.App.1993), and in *State v. Higgins,*852 S.W.2d 172, 175 (Mo.App.1993). It preserves nothing for review. *State v. Nenninger,*872 S.W.2d 589 (Mo.App.), *cert.*denied,- U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 589, 130 L.Ed.2d 503 (1994); *State v. Vivone,*857 S.W.2d 489, 498 (Mo.App.1993).

Point II is likewise defective and preserves nothing for review. It yields no clue as to wherein and why the information did not charge defendant with the offense of careless and imprudent driving. *State v. Coomer,*888 S.W.2d 356, 361 (Mo.App.1994).

The judgment is affirmed.

PREWITT, P.J., and CROW, J., concur.
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.72


 


Loan Agreement


 


Contract No. :ABC(2012)1013-1
13010120130002772                                


 


Borrower
: Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., Ltd.


Lender :
Agricultural Bank of China, Shijiazhuang North City Branch


 


Signing Date : October 30, 2013


 


Loan Amount
: RMB200,000,000


 


Length of
maturity : From October 30, 2013 to October 29, 2014


 


Use of Loan
: Vehicle Purchase


 


Loan Interest : 6.60%


 


Debt Note
:Debt note is one of the part of the contract, not specified in the contract or records do not match the loan amount, date
of draft, repayment date stated on the debt note, the loan documents shall prevail.


There are three Debt Note of
the contract:


 


		1.	Date of Draft :November 5, 2013



Draft Amount: RMB100,000,000


Repayment
Date :November 4, 2013


 


		2.	Date of Draft :November 19, 2013



Draft Amount: RMB20,000,000


Repayment
Date :November 18, 2013


 


		3.	Date of Draft :December 10, 2013



Draft Amount: RMB80,000,000


Repayment
Date :December 9, 2013


 


Withdrawal Amount : RMB200,000,000


 


Payment Method : The principal shall be fully repaid with interest
at the maturity date of the loan.


.


Repayment
Date :October 29, 2014


 


Loan Guarantee : Guaranty of Pledge


 


 - Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing
Co., Ltd entered into The Maximum Pledge Contract with the lender, with the contract no. ABC(2012)2002 13100220130061344.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4326

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interactive computer

services from releasing to the public certain private information.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit interactive computer services from releasing to the public

certain private information.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘On-Line Privacy Pro5 tection Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RELEASE OF CERTAIN PRIVATE

7 INFORMATION.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended by inserting after chapter 87 the following:
2

•HR 4326 IH

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 88—PRIVACY AND

2 INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICES

‘‘Sec.

‘‘1801. Prohibition on release of certain private information.

3 ‘‘§ 1801. Prohibition on release of certain private in4 formation

5 ‘‘(a) Whoever being an interactive computer service

6 releases to the public any private personally identifiable

7 information of another person without the prior informed

8 written consent of that person shall be fined not more than

9 $500.

10 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

11 ‘‘(1) the term ‘interactive computer service’

12 means any information service that provides com13 puter access to multiple users via the Internet;

14 ‘‘(2) the term ‘Internet’ means the international

15 computer network of both Federal and non-Federal

16 interoperable packet switched data networks; and

17 ‘‘(3) the term ‘personally identifiable informa18 tion’ has the meaning given such term in section

19 631 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.

20 551).’’.

21 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

22 at the beginning of part I of title 18, United States Code,
3

•HR 4326 IH

1 is amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter

2 87 the following:

‘‘88. Privacy and Interactive Computer Services .................. 1801’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chancery Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Geoffrey Gachallan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 12thday of October, 2007.

GEOFFREY GACHALLANGeoffrey Gachallan 
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer















---