alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

ERICK BURGESS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-13019

PROBILITY PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC,

Defendant.

/

ORDER STRIKING TWO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS AND 

SETTING DATE ON WHICH DISMISSAL BECOMES WITH PREJUDICE

On February 11, 2011, the court dismissed this case without prejudice to allow

the parties time to negotiate an amicable resolution to this matter and to finalize

settlement documents. On June 13, 2011, the court conducted a telephone conference,

at which point the parties confirmed that all issues have been resolved and the

settlement will become final by the end of September, 2011. During the conference, the

court also explained to the parties, that it does not typically accept settlement

agreements for filing on the official court record. The court will therefore strike the two

settlement agreements docketed by the parties as improvidently filed. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that any party may move to reopen the case by September 30,

2011, at which point the court will conduct a telephone conference to determine whether

the case should be placed back on the court’s active docket. After September 30,

2011, in the absence of any further order of the court or filing by the parties, this

dismissal will be with prejudice.

2:09-cv-13019-RHC-MAR Doc # 22 Filed 06/24/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 135
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-13019.BURGESS.ConditionalDismissal.chd.wpd

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the two settlement agreements [Dkt. ## 20 &

21] are STRICKEN from the docket as improvidently filed.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 24, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, June 24, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-13019-RHC-MAR Doc # 22 Filed 06/24/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 136
240 So.2d 689

#### In re KING HOMES, INC. v. Robert W. ROBERTS and Bessie Roberts. Ex parte King Homes, Inc.

8 Div. 413.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 5, 1970.

Robert L. Hodges, Ford, Caldwell, Ford & Payne, Huntsville, for petitioner.

Aubrey Lammons, Huntsville, opposed.

HARWOOD, Justice.

Petition of King Homes, Inc., a Corporation, for certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in King Homes, Inc. v. Roberts, 46 Ala.App. 257, 240 So.2d 679 (8 Div. 25).

Writ denied.

SIMPSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, and McCALL, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [OR-030-1020-PN; HAG 08-0097]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Vale District.

# ACTION:

Meeting Notice for the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council.

# SUMMARY:

The John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council meeting is scheduled for September 16, 2008, in John Day, Oregon.

                        The John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council meeting is scheduled for September 16, 2008. The meeting will take place at the Malheur National Forest Supervisor Office, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, John Day, OR, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The meeting may include such topics as the Baker Resource Management Planning, Transportation Planning, Wallowa-Whitman Weed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS),                               ( print page 46033)                            BLM Vegetation Treatments EIS, Travel Management Planning and Energy Rights-of-Way and other matters as may reasonably come before the council. A field trip is scheduled for September 15th to view Off-Highway Vehicle issues and vegetation and weed management issues on BLM lands near John Day, Oregon.                    

The meeting is open to the public. Public comment is scheduled for 1 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. (Pacific Time) September 16, 2008. For a copy of the information to be distributed to the Council members, please submit a written request to the Vale District Office 10 days prior to the meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Additional information concerning the John Day/Snake Resource Advisory Council may be obtained from Mark Wilkening, Public Affairs Officer, Vale District Office, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, Oregon 97918, (541) 473-6218 or e-mail                         *mark_wilkening@blm.gov*.                    

Dated: July 31, 2008.

David R. Henderson,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. E8-18097 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00595-CV

Lester Timothy BEATTY,

Appellant

v.

THE PALMS APARTMENTS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CV04587

Honorable Tommy Stolhandske, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief in this appeal was due November 28, 2018. Neither the brief nor a 

motion for extension of time has been filed. We ORDER appellant to file, by December 17, 

2018, the appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining appellant’s failure to 

timely file the brief. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, 

we may dismiss this appeal.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit No. 13
Headway Corporate Resources, Inc.
Form 10-KSB
File No. 0-23170



           COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                        DECEMBER 31, 1996

Primary                                              
  Net Income                                         $ 1,182,000
  Deemed Dividend on Preferred Stock                 
                                                     (1,147,000)
  Preferred Stock Dividend                                      (
                                                     276,000)
                                                     
  Net (Loss) Used for Primary Per Share Amounts                 (
                                                     564,000)
                                                     
Average Shares Outstanding                             5,231,814
                                                     
Add:                                                 
  Common Equivalent Shares, Determined Using the     
     "Treasury Stock Method" Issuable Upon Exercise      654,340
  Common Shares Issuable Related to Convertible      
     Securities (Series B Preferred Stock)           
     which are Common Stock Equivalents                  642,886
  Contingently Issuable Shares Based on the          
     Attainment of Certain Revenue Criteria          
     in Connection with Furash Acquisition               114,288
                                                     
  Weighted Average Number of Shares Used in          
     Calculation of Primary Income Per Share           6,643,328
                                                     
Primary Net (Loss) Per Common Share                  $
                                                     (.08)
2:09-cv-13362-PJD-CEB Doc # 36 Filed 10/09/13 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 4176
2:09-cv-13362-PJD-CEB Doc # 36 Filed 10/09/13 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 4177
2:09-cv-13362-PJD-CEB Doc # 36 Filed 10/09/13 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 4178
2:09-cv-13362-PJD-CEB Doc # 36 Filed 10/09/13 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 4179
OAO450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

DAMON NATHANIEL, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE Plaintiff

V.

CITY OF DETROIT, ET.AL Case Number: 09-12473

Counter-Defendant

X Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has

rendered its verdict.

G Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and

a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

that the Plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that the Defendants City of Detroit,

Barbara Simon, Ira Todd and Harold Rochon recover of the Plaintiff their costs of action.

September 29, 2010 DAVID J. WEAVER

Date Clerk

(By) Deputy Clerk

s/Marilyn Orem
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-63,513]


CIMA Plastics II Corporation, Formerly Known as SR Plastics, d/b/
a Engineered Quality Plastics, Elberton, GA; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and 
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on July 8, 2008, applicable to workers of 
CIMA Plastics II Corporation, Elberton, Georgia. The notice will be 
published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in employment related to the production of a variety of injection 
molded plastic items including soap dispensers, totes, storage 
containers, and wheels for lawnmowers.
    New information shows that in April 2008, CIMA Plastics II 
Corporation purchased SR Plastics, d/b/a Engineered Quality Plastics 
and that some of the workers' wages at the subject firm are being 
reported under the Unemployment Insurance (UI) tax accounts for CIMA 
Plastics II Corporation, formerly known as SR Plastics, d/b/a 
Engineered Quality Plastics.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of CIMA Plastics II Corporation, formerly known as SR Plastics, 
d/b/a Engineered Quality Plastics who were adversely affected by a 
shift in production of injection molded plastics including soap 
dispensers, totes, storage containers, and wheels for lawn mowers to 
Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-63,513 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of CIMA Plastics II Corporation, formerly known as 
SR Plastics, d/b/a Engineered Quality Plastics, Elberton, Georgia, 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after June 2, 2007, through July 8, 2010, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of July 2008.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-18170 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agatha
Auduon, the Treasurer and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six month
          period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: May 8, 2008

                                      /s/ Agatha Auduon
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Agatha Auduon
                                      Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 155 (Monday, August 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46632-46633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group; Clinical, Treatment and Health 
Services Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: October 14-15, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 46633]]

    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Katrina L. Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3042 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-4032, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204b415452494e41604d41494c0e4e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="056e6471776c6b644568646c692b6b6c6d2b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 31, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-18253 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>





                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.2
                                          
                                          
                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                                          
                                          
The Board of Directors
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No. 
33-90926 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 23, 1999 relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. and subsidiary as 
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, the related statements of operations, 
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years then ended and the 
financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1998 
Form 10-K of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.

Our report dated March 23, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that 
states that the Company has incurred significant losses in two of the last 
three years and as a result has suffered from insufficient liquidity to pay 
its obligations as they come due. Additionally, several of the Company's 
major operating and debt agreements have either expired or will expire in the 
near future. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's 
ability to continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial 
statements and financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments 
that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.


                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
March 30, 1999
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTIAN JOHNSON,

Petitioner, 

v.

BLAINE LAFLER,

Respondent. 

/

Case Number: 09-CV-11373

Honorable George Caram Steeh

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

TO STAY HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS

Petitioner Christian Johnson, a Michigan state inmate currently incarcerated at the Carson

City Correctional Facility in Carson City, Michigan, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he is incarcerated in violation of his

constitutional rights. Before the Court now is Petitioner’s motion requesting that this Court stay his

habeas-corpus proceedings until he has had an opportunity to appeal his restitution claims; Petitioner

claims that his habeas proceedings should be stayed until he has fully exhausted the trial court’s

restitution order, dated February 21, 2008. 

The habeas statute provides that a federal court may entertain a habeas application by a state

prisoner “only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties

of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). An order of restitution has no bearing on the validity

or duration of a prisoner’s custody, and therefore a challenge to the order of restitution is not

cognizable under § 2254. Carter v. Smith, No. 06-CV-11927, 2007 WL 325358, at *7 (E.D. Mich.

Jan.31, 2007). 

2:09-cv-11373-GCS-VMM Doc # 9 Filed 09/29/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 220
2

Because this Court does not have jurisdiction over the state court’s order of restitution, or

the appeals process of such, a stay of Petitioner’s habeas proceedings is not appropriate. Petitioner’s

motion is therefore denied.

Dated: September 29, 2009

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 29, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11373-GCS-VMM Doc # 9 Filed 09/29/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 221
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Matthew Krieg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Generation Zero Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Generation Zero Group, Inc.





By:/s/ Matthew Krieg


Matthew Krieg


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)





November 24, 2010
Exhibit 13.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Migenix Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arthur J. Ayres, Sr. Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Arthur J. Ayres

Arthur J. Ayres

Sr. Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer

July 31, 2006



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Virgil Lee JORDAN, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68570.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

Rosalynn Koch, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

*871Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).