UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FREDERICK O. OPIYO, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-13609

v.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

DEPUTY H. BOEHM et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 31); DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. # 32); DENYING APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. # 33); AND DENYING

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC. # 34)

The above-captioned case was initiated in 2009 by the filing of a pro se 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint by federal prisoner Frederick Opiyo.1

 The case has now been

closed for well over two years. Nonetheless, Opiyo has recently filed what appears to

be a new pro se response to the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants in

April 2010 and granted by the court in September 2010. Opiyo has also filed the form

application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se motions requesting “leave to

proceed in forma pauperis” and “for appointment of counsel.”

1

The court notes that a limited appearance was filed by counsel for Opiyo, who

filed certain pleadings while the matter was pending.

-1-

2:09-cv-13609-GCS-CEB Doc # 35 Filed 05/02/13 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 434
Opiyo’s claims remaining at the time defendants filed their motion for summary

judgment were dismissed by this court, by its acceptance of the magistrate’s report and

recommendation, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. As noted above, this

occurred in September 2010. The court noted in its September 2010 order that Opiyo

had failed to lodge any objections to the R & R.

In October 2012, two years after disposition of the case, Opiyo filed a motion for

leave to file objections to the report and recommendation. This court denied that

motion, stating that “[b]ecause the motion does not address plaintiff’s failure to exhaust

administrative remedies, which is fatal to his claims, the court believes an objection

would not change the result in this case.” (Doc. # 30 at 1-2.)2

 Now, months after that

order, Opiyo has again sent documents to the court.

This case is closed. Opiyo did not file timely objections to the report and

recommendation, which was accepted by the court more than two and a half years ago,

and did not appeal from the court’s judgment. Accordingly, there is no pending matter

with respect to which the court could even consider the appointment of counsel, and no

reason to consider another application to proceed in forma pauperis (the court notes

Opiyo’s 2009 application to proceed IFP was granted by the court). Accordingly,

2

It appears that Opiyo’s current filing is, in part, an attempt to respond to that

order. He states that “at least three or more impediments made a timely Exhaustion

absolutely impossible,” and describes his “physical incapacitation,” intimidation, and

label of “snitch” allegedly assigned to him by jail personnel. (Doc. # 31 at 2.) However,

in that very document, Opiyo states that following a letter sent by him to the chief judge

of this court, dated October 12, 2008, in which he requested “security and protection for

fear of retaliation,” he was “immediately transferred...to a federal detention center.” Id. 

Opiyo’s attempt to explain his failure to exhaust is thus belied by his acknowledgment

that he was promptly removed from the situation he states he found so intimidating.

-2-

2:09-cv-13609-GCS-CEB Doc # 35 Filed 05/02/13 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 435
Opiyo’s motions to (1) proceed IFP and (2) for appointment of counsel are hereby

DENIED. Additionally, Opiyo’s form application to proceed IFP is DENIED, and his

“response” to defendants’ motion for summary judgment is hereby STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 2, 2013

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

May 2, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also

Frederick O. Opiyo #39194-039, FCI Bastrop, Federal

Correctional Institution, P. O. Box 1010, Bastrop, TX 78602.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

-3-

2:09-cv-13609-GCS-CEB Doc # 35 Filed 05/02/13 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 436