alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Jessica Wilson,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-12996

v. Hon. Sean F. Cox

Merchants & Medical Credit Corporation,

Inc., Jane Doe, and Mr. Shaw, Individually 

and Jointly,

Defendants.

_________________________________________________/

ORDER STRIKING REPLY BRIEF

On June 18, 2010, Defendants filed a 10-page brief (Docket Entry No. 40) as a reply to two

pending motions: 1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; and 2) Defendants’ Motion to

Compel.

On June 23, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to strike the reply brief as untimely filed

and as exceeding the page limits for a reply brief under Local Rule 7.1.

Having reviewed the June 18, 2010 Reply Brief, and Plaintiff’s motion seeking to strike it,

the Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant’s June 18, 2010 Reply Brief (Docket Entry No. 40) is

STRICKEN from the record and the Clerk of the Court is directed to annotate the record in the ECF

system to indicate the document is stricken. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall have five (5) days from the date of this

order to file two separate reply briefs that shall comply with the page limits set forth in Local Rule

7.1.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: June 30, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on June

30, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement of Illinova
Corporation and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the balance sheet,
income statement and cash flow statement of Illinova Corporation.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         4664
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         66
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             401
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           479
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5610
<COMMON>                                          1416
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                130
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    1546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               97 <F1>
<PREFERRED>                                        126 <F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              1677
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 131
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     229
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       62
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         62
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    33
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    1647
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     5610
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         1641
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               126
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1191
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1317
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            324
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  (7)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     317
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           166 <F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                       151
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0 <F3>
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      148
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            77 <F4>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          126
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<F1>   Preferred stock of subsidiary Illinois Power Company
<F2>   Includes preferred stock dividend requirement of subsidiary
       Illinois Power Company of $24 million
<F3>   Preferred stock dividend of Illinois Power Company is included
       in interest expense
<F4>   Cash dividends paid
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6305] 

                    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of State, including under                           ( print page 44799)                        Section 556 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (Pub. L. 109–102) (“FY 2006 FOAA”), as carried forward in the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Pub. L. 110–5) (“FY 2007 CR”), and Section 649 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2008 (Div. J, Pub. L. 110–161) (“FY 2008 SFOAA”), and delegated to me pursuant to Department of State Delegation of Authority 245, I hereby determine, certify, and report that the Colombian Armed Forces are meeting the conditions contained in Sections 556(a)(2) and 556(a)(3) of FY 2006 FOAA, as carried forward in the FY 2007 CR, as well as Sections 649(c)(2) and 649(c)(3) of the FY 2008 SFOAA, and that I have consulted with Congress as is consistent with the latter.                 

The Department of State has periodically consulted with internationally recognized human rights organizations regarding the Colombian Armed Forces' progress in meeting the above-mentioned conditions, as provided in Section 556(c) of the FY 2006 FOAA, as carried forward in the FY 2007 CR, and Section 649(d) of the FY 2008 SFOAA. 

                    This Determination and Certification shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.                 

Dated: July 28, 2008. 

John D. Negroponte, 

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E8–17680 Filed 7–30–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–29–P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Brazil Fast Food Corp. (the Company)
for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Ricardo Figueiredo Bomeny, Chief Executive Officer and Acting
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual
period ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 15, 2005
    /s/ Ricardo Figueiredo BomenyRicardo Figueiredo BomenyChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARRYL ANTHONY ROBINSON,

Petitioner, 

v.

HUGH WOLFENBARGER,

Respondent. 

______________________________/

Civil Action No. 09-CV-12706

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

OPINION AND ORDER TRANSFERRING SUCCESSIVE PETITION

FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TO THE UNITED STATES

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Petitioner Darryl Anthony Robinson, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the

Macomb Correctional Facility in New Haven, Michigan, has filed a pro se petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his 1983 conviction for seconddegree murder. The court finds that the pending petition constitutes a successive petition over which

the court lacks jurisdiction. Therefore, the court transfers the matter to the United States Court of

Appeals for the Sixth Circuit so that petitioner may seek permission to file a successive petition.

In 2005, petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition in the Western District of Michigan,

challenging the same conviction challenged in the pending petition. That court dismissed that

petition with prejudice because it was time-barred. See Robinson v. Luoma, No. 05-CV-196 (W.D.

Mich. Jan. 4, 2006). The Sixth Circuit has held that dismissal of a habeas corpus petition is a

dismissal “on the merits.” In re Cook, 215 F. 3d 606, 607 (6th Cir. 2000). Accord Villanueva v.

United States, 346 F.3d 55, 61 (2d Cir. 2003) (holding that a dismissal of a suit as untimely is a

dismissal on the merits). Therefore, petitioner’s prior habeas petition, which was dismissed as

2:09-cv-12706-BAF-PJK Doc # 2 Filed 07/17/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 12
2

untimely, was a dismissal on the merits. 

Because petitioner’s previous habeas petition was filed after the enactment of the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, his current petition is subject to the “second or

successive” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). See Cress v. Palmer, 484 F.3d 844, 852 (6th

Cir. 2007). Before a prisoner may file a habeas petition challenging a conviction already challenged

in a prior habeas petition, he must “move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing

the district court to consider the application.” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Petitioner has not

obtained the required authorization to file a second or successive petition in this court. The Sixth

Circuit has held that “when a second or successive petition for habeas corpus relief or § 2255 motion

is filed in the district court without § 2244(b)(3) authorization from this court, the district court shall

transfer the document to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.” In re Sims, 111 F.3d 45, 47 (6th

Cir. 1997). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the clerk transfer the petition in this matter to the United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. 

S/Bernard A. Friedman_____

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 17, 2009

Detroit, Michigan

2:09-cv-12706-BAF-PJK Doc # 2 Filed 07/17/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JERAL PEOPLES,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 09-CV-12464

v. JUDGE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CITY OF DETROIT, et. al.,

Defendant(s),

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MOOT

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,” filed April

22, 2010. (Dkt. # 14.) For the reasons stated, the motion is denied as moot.

On July 9, 2009, the Court denied Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed

his civil rights complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), because he was a three

striker. (Dkt. # 3.) Subsequently, on August 17, 2009, Plaintiff filed an appeal from that decision

with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The case was docketed in the Sixth

Circuit as case number 09-2057. The case is presently pending.

The document before this Court is captioned “United States District Court Western District”

and has the Sixth Circuit’s case number 09-2057 in the caption. After a careful review of the

document submitted, it appears that the document was originally sent to the Sixth Circuit and the

Sixth Circuit sent it back to this Court. See People v. Detroit, No. 09-2057 (6th Cir.), Docket Entry

4/14/2010. When the document was received in this Court, the Clerk docketed it under case number

09-12464, which is the case number of the civil rights complaint that this Court summarily

dismissed
2

on the basis that Plaintiff was a three striker. Therefore, this document is not properly before the

Court. This case is closed.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment”

[dkt.# 14] is DENIED as moot.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: April 30, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the above date a copy of this Order was served upon all parties of

record via ordinary U.S. Mail and/or electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.567 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.568 Filed 06/21/11 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.569 Filed 06/21/11 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.570 Filed 06/21/11 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.571 Filed 06/21/11 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.572 Filed 06/21/11 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.573 Filed 06/21/11 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.574 Filed 06/21/11 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.575 Filed 06/21/11 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.576 Filed 06/21/11 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.577 Filed 06/21/11 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.578 Filed 06/21/11 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.579 Filed 06/21/11 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.580 Filed 06/21/11 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.581 Filed 06/21/11 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:09-cr-20353-PJD-MKM ECF No. 146, PageID.582 Filed 06/21/11 Page 16 of 16
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 21

                   WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NAME                                                PLACE OF INCORPORATION
----                                                ----------------------
<S>                                                 <C>
Trans World Gaming of Louisiana, Inc.               Louisiana, USA

TWG International U.S. Corporation                  Nevada, USA

TWG Finance Corp.                                   Delaware, USA

Art Marketing, Ltd. d/b/a Tottenham & Co.           London, UK

SC98A, s.r.o.                                       Czech Republic

21st Century Resorts, a.s.                          Czech Republic

LMJ Casino Rozvadov, a.s.                           Czech Republic

LMJ Slots, s.r.o.                                   Czech Republic

Atlantic Properties, s.r.o.                         Czech Republic

Casino de Zaragoza, SA                              Zaragoza, Spain


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         117,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  321,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               954,417
<PP&E>                                         295,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,171,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          998,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,872,150
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,879,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,171,838
<SALES>                                      3,719,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,719,329
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,709,106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (989,777)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (884,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,686,341)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4201 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4201

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to encourage qualified 
  conservation contributions by individuals of capital gain property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 1996

 Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to encourage qualified 
  conservation contributions by individuals of capital gain property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATIONS TO ENCOURAGE QUALIFIED CONSERVATION 
              CONTRIBUTIONS OF CAPITAL GAIN PROPERTY.

    (a) Qualified Conservation Contributions Not Subject to Special 
Limitation on Contributions of Capital Gain Property.--Subparagraph (C) 
of section 170(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
special limitation with respect to contributions described in 
subparagraph (A) of capital gain property) is amended by redesignating 
clause (iv) as clause (v) and by inserting after clause (iii) the 
following new clause:
                            ``(iv) Clauses (i) and (ii) shall not apply 
                        to any qualified conservation contribution (as 
                        defined in subsection (h)) described in 
                        subparagraph (A) of capital gain property.''
    (b) Unlimited Carryover of Qualified Conservation Contributions of 
Capital Gain Property.--Paragraph (1) of section 170(d) of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Unlimited carryover of qualified conservation 
                contributions of capital gain property.--The 5 taxable 
                year limitation in subparagraph (A) shall not apply to 
                any qualified conservation contribution (as defined in 
                subsection (h)) described in subsection (b)(1)(A) of 
                capital gain property (as defined in subsection 
                (b)(1)(C)(v)). For purposes of this paragraph, the 
                excess described in the material preceding clause (i) 
                of subparagraph (A) shall be treated as attributable to 
                contributions described in the preceding sentence of 
                the subparagraph to the extent of such contributions.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11297 and <greek-i>11298]


Nebraska Disaster Number NE-00020

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Nebraska (FEMA--1770--DR), dated 06/20/
2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/22/2008 through 06/24/2008.
    Effective Date: 07/29/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/19/2008.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/20/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Nebraska, dated 06/20/2008 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):
    Holt.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Nebraska: Antelope, Boyd, Keya Paha, Knox, Rock, Wheeler.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-17942 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-122126) pertaining to the 1997Director Stock Option Plan and the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan of Jameson Inns, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 2005, except for Note 13, as to which the date is March 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules ofJameson Inns, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 25, 2005