alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 119

     For the relief of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     For the relief of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GUY PRIVAT TAPE AND LOU NAZIE 
              RAYMONDE TOTO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Guy Privat 
Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto shall each be eligible for the 
issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 
alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Guy Privat Tape or Lou Nazie Raymonde 
Toto enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c), Guy Privat Tape or Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto, as 
appropriate, shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully 
in the United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for the issuance of an immigrant visa or 
the application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 
not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon granting an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie 
Raymonde Toto, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer 
to reduce by 2, during the current or subsequent fiscal year, the total 
number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 
country of birth of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto under 
section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that 
are made available to natives of the country of birth of Guy Privat 
Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto under section 202(e) of such Act (8 
U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ESSIE BYRD O/B/O J.E.B.,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-11873

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [24]

I have before me Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan’s Report and Recommendation

(“Report”). (Dkt. 24.) In her Report, Magistrate Judge Morgan recommends that I grant Defendant

Commissioner of Social Security’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 22), and deny Plaintiff

Byrd’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 21). Plaintiff filed an Objection to the Report.

(Dkt. 25.) Having thoroughly considered Plaintiff’s Objection and Magistrate Judge Morgan’s

Report, I conclude that Magistrate Judge Morgan correctly analyzed the issues and I agree with her

recommendations. 

It appears that Plaintiff’s primary argument is that JEB’s impairments have worsened since

the administrative law judge’s determination in February 2008. “If in fact [JEB’s] condition ha[s]

seriously degenerated, the appropriate remedy would have been to initiate a new claim for benefits

as of the date that the condition aggravated to the point of constituting a disabling impairment.”

Sizemore v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 865 F.2d 709, 712 (6th Cir. 1988) (citing Oliver v.
2

Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 804 F.2d 964, 966 (6th Cir. 1986); Ward v. Schweiker, 686 F.2d

762, 786 & n.4 (9th Cir. 1982)).

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Morgan’s Report and Recommendation,

OVERRULE Plaintiff’s Objections, GRANT Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, DENY

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and DISMISS the case WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: September 28, 2010

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of record

and Essie Byrd by electronic means or U.S. Mail

on September 28, 2010.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 21


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                                              Jurisdiction
                                                                   of
                  Subsidiary                                  Organization
                  ----------                                  ------------
          1. Dan River Factory Stores, Inc..................  Georgia
          2. The Bibb Company LLC...........................  Delaware
          3. Dan River International Ltd....................  Virginia
          4. Dan River B.V..................................  The Netherlands
          5. Dan River de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.........  Mexico
          6. Maquilas Pinnacle, S. de R.L. de C.V...........  Mexico
          7. Adercorp, S. de R.L. de C.V....................  Mexico
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Group Realty Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul G. Del Vecchio, Executive Vice President—Capital Markets of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Paul G. Del Vecchio

 

 

Paul G. Del Vecchio

Senior Vice President—Capital Markets

March 19, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17854]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Meeting

    Date and Time: Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 1 p.m. Eastern Time.
    Place: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor 
of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20507.
    Status: Part of the meeting will be open to the public and part of 
the meeting will be closed.

Matters To Be Considered

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Sole Source Subscription Renewal to LRP's CyberFEDS on the Web.

Closed Session

    Agency Adjudication and Determination on Federal Agency 
Discrimination Complaint Appeals.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the open session of 
the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's 
deliberations and voting. The remainder of the meeting will be 
closed. Any matter not discussed or concluded may be carried over to 
a later meeting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC 
Commission meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also 
provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future 
Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing 
impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by 
using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.
    Contact Person for More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: July 30, 2008.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E8-17854 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND, #191565,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-15253

v. DISTRICT JUDGE AVERN COHN

M. RABY, KEITH BERBICK, MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON

KEVIN KERR, NICOLAS SMISSICK,

DANIEL ROSE, ANDREW BELANGER, 

BRIAN BOLASH, and ANTHONY

CARIGNAN,

Defendants.

 /

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. NO. 95)

Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections, has

filed this action alleging claims cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the

court is Plaintiff’s fifth attempt to amend his complaint. In this latest attempt, Plaintiff seeks

leave to add two more defendants. In particular, Plaintiff claims that after reviewing

Defendants’ summary judgment motion, he “was made aware of another plain clothed

officer that was involved with the assault on Plaintiff and should not be allowed to escape

liability.” Plaintiff’s motion does not identify this officer by name but seeks leave to add the

officer as a defendant as well as the municipality for which the officer worked. 

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), since more than 21 days has elapsed from the time

he was served with a responsive pleading, Plaintiff must obtain the court’s leave to amend

his complaint (or the opposing party’s written consent). “The court should freely give leave

- 1 -
when justice so requires.” Id. However, leave to amend may always be denied if the

proposed amendment is futile. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).

Due to the fact that Plaintiff failed to submit a copy of his proposed amended

complaint with his motion in accordance with E.D. Mich. L. R. 15.1, the Court cannot make

a determination on the appropriateness of Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff IS ORDERED to submit a proposed amended complaint on or before

July 23, 2010, so that the Court may determine whether the proposed amendment(s)

should be allowed. Plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint shall be clearly marked to

delineate where changes have been proposed to be made from the previously amended

complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a pleading titled “Proposed

Amended Complaint” on or before July 23, 2010, with all proposed changes clearly

delineated, or this motion will be deemed dismissed.

s/Mark A. Randon 

MARK A. RANDON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: June 30, 2010

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this

date, June 30, 2010, by electronic and/or first class U.S. mail.

s/Melody R. Miles 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon

- 2 -
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Christine B. Cheney, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Generation Zero Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Generation Zero Group, Inc.  By:/s/ Christine B. Cheney Christine B. Cheney Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)  August 13, 2015  The foregoing certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Ray MAHLBERG, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68936.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 20, 1996.

Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled guilty to passing bad checks, § 570.120, RSMo 1994. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court imposed a sentence of three years imprisonment.

Defendant filed a Rule 24.035 motion. Thereafter, the motion court entered judgment denying the motion without a hearing. *859On appeal, defendant alleges the trial court erred in accepting his plea of guilty because there was an insufficient factual basis to support his conviction. However, defendant failed to raise this issue in his Rule 24.035 motion. We have no jurisdiction to review issues which were not before the motion court. *State v. Light,*835 S.W.2d 933, 941 (Mo.App.E.D.1992).

The motion court’s judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



The undersigned officer of Western Graphite
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: February 6, 2015



|/s/David Wimberly                                                           | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|David Wimberly                                                              | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer                        
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
K:\DOCS\LIT\ASHFJ\A37000\MOT\JA2703.WPD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DENESSA WESTBROOK, APRIL

WESTBROOK, and MARTIN WESTBROOK,

Plaintiffs, USDC Case No. 09-11457

Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

vs. Mag. R. Steven Whalen 

LARRY DAVIS, JOSEPH WEEKLEY,

JASON BRASGALLA, KEVIN SHEPHARD, 

G. CHESTER, D. FOSTER, C. ANDERSON, 

T. DOLLINGER, S. HOWITT, and E. HAYES, 

Defendants.

____________________________________________________________________

CHRISTOPHER J. TRAINOR (P-42449) JERRY L. ASHFORD (P-47402)

SHAWN C. CABO T (P-64021) Attorney for Defendants 

CHRISTOPHER TRAINOR & ASSOC City of Detroit Law Department

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1650 First National Building

9750 Highland Road 660 Woodward Avenue

White Lake, Michigan 48386 Detroit, Michigan 48226

(248) 886-8650 (313) 237-3089

_____________________________________________________________________

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION TO VACATE JUNE 29, 2010 ORDER

In response to Plaintiffs’Motion To Vacate, defense counsel inquired and was

informed the City of Detroit Law Department submitted a check request, in the amount of

the settlement, to the City of Detroit Finance Department on October 21, 2010. Despite

constant inquiries, to date, the check has not been submitted to the Law Department for

payment to Plaintiffs. 

When this matter was settled in the best interest of all parties, as stated in the

Release between the parties, Plaintiffs were aware that no date certain could be given for

2:09-cv-11457-NGE-RSW Doc # 43 Filed 11/24/10 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 408
K:\DOCS\LIT\ASHFJ\A37000\MOT\JA2703.WPD

payment of a settlement check based on the City of Detroit’s lengthy settlement process.

Because of current economic conditions and City workforce reductions, the settlement

process has become more time-consuming than in the past. Nonetheless, defense counsel

and the Law Department continue to demand the check and, hopefully, the settlement

check will be cut before or on December 3, 2010. 

Defendants respectfully request that this honorable court give the City of Detroit

until December 3, 2010, to issue the settlement check before reinstating the case and/or

assessment of costs and fees. 

Respectfully submitted,

CITY OF DETROIT LAW DEPARTMENT

S/ Jerry L. Ashford

____________________________________

JERRY L. ASHFORD (P-47402)

Attorney for Defendants 

1650 First National Building

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 237-3089

ashfj@detroitmi.gov

Dated: November 24, 2010

I hereby certify that on November 24, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing paper with

the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the above counsel of record. 

S/ Jerry L. Ashford (P-47402)

City of Detroit Law Department

660 Woodward Ave. - Suite 1650

Detroit, Michigan 48226

(313) 237-3089

ashfj@detroitmi.gov

2:09-cv-11457-NGE-RSW Doc # 43 Filed 11/24/10 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 409
K:\DOCS\LIT\ASHFJ\A37000\MOT\JA2703.WPD

 

2:09-cv-11457-NGE-RSW Doc # 43 Filed 11/24/10 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 410
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STONEBRIDGE EQUITY LLC, 

d/b/a STONEBRIDGE BUSINESS 

PARTNERS, a Michigan limited 

liability company, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-11541 

vs. Honorable Denise Page Hood 

CHINA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen 

a Delaware corporation, 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________________________________________________ 

Randall J. Gillary (P 29905) Mark V. Heusel (P 47528) 

Kevin P. Albus (P 53668) Omar N. Chaudhary (P 71676) 

RANDALL J. GILLARY, P.C. BUTZEL LONG 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

201 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 1020 350 S. Main Street, Ste. 300 

Troy, MI 48084 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(248) 528-0440 (734) 995-3110 

____________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 The parties having stipulated to the entry hereof, and the Court being otherwise fully 

advised in the premises; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 

without costs or attorney fees to either party, so that the parties may submit their claims to 

arbitration. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for 

the purpose of enforcing the parties’ arbitration agreement, and for the purpose of confirming, 

LAW OFFICES OF

RANDALL J. GILLARY, P.C. 

COLUMBIA CENTER

201 W. BIG BEAVER ROAD

SUITE 1020 

TROY, MI 48084 

_________ 

(248) 528-0440 

FAX (248) 528-3412 

Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-2, PageID.65 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW Document 16 Filed 09/28/2009 Page 1 of 2
2

vacating, or correcting any arbitration award in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 

U.S.C. §§ 1-16. 

 s/ DENISE PAGE HOOD 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: September 28, 2009 

Stipulated and agreed to: 

s/Kevin P. Albus s/Mark V. Heusel (w/consent) 

RANDALL J. GILLARY, P.C. BUTZEL LONG 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

201 W. Big Beaver Rd., Ste. 1020 350 S. Main Street, Ste. 300 

Troy, MI 48084 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(248) 528-0440 (734) 995-3100 

kalbus@gillarylaw.com heusel@butzel.com 

P53668 P47528 

Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-2, PageID.66 Filed 07/27/11 Page 2 of 2 Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW Document 16 Filed 09/28/2009 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                      CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT

         The undersigned certifies that he is an Executive Vice President of The
CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of
Delaware ("CITSF"), and that as such he is duly authorized to execute and
deliver this certificate on behalf of CITSF in connection with Section 4.9(a) of
the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1997 (the
"Agreement"), among CITSF, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, The
Chase Manhattan Bank, as Sellers, and CIT RV Owner Trust 1997-A, for which
Wilmington Trust Company acts as Owner Trustee and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota,
N.A. formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA acts as Indenture Trustee (all
capitalized terms used herein without definition having the respective meanings
specified in the Agreement). The undersigned further certifies to the Owner
Trustee and to the Indenture Trustee that a review of the activities of CITSF
during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement
has been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on
such review, CITSF has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement during the
preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature this 10th day of
February, 2003.

                                                 THE CIT GROUP/SALES
                                                 FINANCING, INC., as Servicer

                                                 /s/ William L. Schumm
                                                 ------------------------
                                                 Name: William L. Schumm
                                                 Title: Executive Vice President
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HANNA JABER,

Plaintiff, CASE NUMBER: 09-11610

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

v.

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY

BOARD OF GOVERNORS,

and DR. PAULA C. WOOD

Defendants.

 /

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ “Motion for Reconsideration” of

the Court’s “Order Granting in part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” The

Court held a hearing on Defendants’ motion on September 21, 2010. For the reasons

stated on the record, Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED.

For reasons also stated on the record, Defendants’ “Motion for Summary

Judgment” on Jaber’s procedural due process claim is DENIED. Pursuant to the liberal

standard for amendments to pleadings which provides that the Court should freely give

a party leave to amend pleadings “when justice so requires,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 (a)(2),

Jaber may amend her complaint to state a procedural due process claim against

Defendants based on Dean Woods’ purported lack of authority to revoke her doctoral

degree. 
2

IT IS ORDERED.

s/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: September 23, 2010

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of record

by electronic means or U.S. Mail on September

23, 2010.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk