alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:








(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.







Dated:  August 19, 2011


By:


/s/ Ye Xing Zhang


Ye Xing Zhang


Chief Executive Officer and President


(Principal Executive Officer)
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lawrence Siccia, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Silverstar Mining
      Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Silverstar Mining Corp.                                                                

Dated: August 14, 2009



| | /s/
      Lawrence Siccia                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Lawrence Siccia                                               
| | President and Director                                        
| | Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer                              
| | Silverstar Mining Corp.                                       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silverstar
Mining Corp. and will be retained by Silverstar Mining Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**EXHIBIT 31**



**CERTIFICATIONS**



I,Christopher Valloscertify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Gold Lakes Corp.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.





|                       |     |                                                                                                                                                 | 
|---------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: November 3, 2015 | By: | */s/**Christopher Vallos*                                                                                                                       | 
|                       |     | Christopher Vallos                                                                                                                              | 
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3939

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs to offer a loan guaranteed by an adjustable rate mortgage under

chapter 37 of such title.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 1, 1996

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. MONTGOMERY, Mr.

HAYWORTH, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. WELLER, Mr. DAVIS,

Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. FLANAGAN, Mr. LONGLEY, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr.

TIAHRT, Mr. FORBES, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr.

MASCARA, Mr. MCHALE, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. DORNAN, Mr. WATTS of

Oklahoma, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. NORWOOD, Mr. STEARNS, Mr. HANCOCK, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. CALVERT, and Mr. RIGGS) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to offer a loan guaranteed

by an adjustable rate mortgage under chapter 37 of

such title.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3939 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTABLE RATE MORT2 GAGES.

3 Section 3707(a) of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking out ‘‘The Secretary shall’’ through

5 ‘‘loans’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘The Secretary may

6 guarantee loans under this section’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of MercantileBank Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-52620, 333-91434, 333-99853 333-103242,333-117763, 333-119767 and 333-138328) and Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-59154, 333-103376, 333-108929, and 333-107814) of our reports dated February 20, 2007 relating to the 2006 consolidatedfinancial statements of Mercantile Bank Corporation, and management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which reports are included in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Mercantile Bank Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.              /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC   Crowe Chizek and Company LLC      Grand Rapids, Michigan
**EXHIBIT23**

 

# **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statements No’s. 333-128923, 333-115840, 333-110264, 333-44954,333-92629, 333-92631, 333-57331, 333-32911 and 333-08863 on Form S-8 of ourreports dated March 10, 2006 related to the consolidated financial statementsof FEI Company and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of FEICompany for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon

March 10, 2006

 

----
GS FINANCIAL PRODUCTS U.S., L.P.

EXHIBIT 12.1

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     FISCAL YEARS ENDED
                                    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(U.S. dollars in thousands)         Nov. 26, 1993    Nov. 25, 1994     Nov. 24, 1995      Nov. 29, 1996       Nov. 28, 1997
                                    -------------    -------------     -------------      -------------       -------------
<S>                                 <C>              <C>               <C>                <C>                 <C>
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations
    before income taxes                     4,812           10,199            12,583             14,514              14,836
Add:  Fixed charges                             0               27               500              3,643               9,265
                                            -----           ------            ------             ------              ------
Earnings as adjusted                        4,812           10,226            13,083             18,157              24,101

Fixed charges:
Interest expense                                0               27               471              3,627               9,265
Debt amortization expense                       0                0                29                 16                   0
Interest portion of rent expense                0                0                 0                  0                   0
                                            -----           ------            ------             ------              ------
Total fixed charges                             0               27               500              3,643               9,265

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges            N/A             378x(1)            26x                 5x                2.6x


For purposes of computing  the ratio of earnings to fixed  charges,  earnings as
adjusted  consist of net  income  plus  income  taxes and fixed  charges.  Fixed
charges consist of interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs.

<FN>

Note (1):  The Company does not consider this ratio to be meaningful since it is
           based on  $5,000,000 in principal  amount of the  Company's  Series A
           Medium Term Notes outstanding only 42 days during fiscal 1994.
</FN>
</TABLE>
Case 2:08-cv-15018-JAC-MJH   ECF No. 117-2, PageID.2881   Filed 09/09/13   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:08-cv-15018-JAC-MJH   ECF No. 117-2, PageID.2882   Filed 09/09/13   Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MARIO CLARKE,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-11246

vs. DISTRICT JUDGE BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONALD A. SCHEER

RANDY UMBERGER, et.al., 

 Defendants. 

 ________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Application For Appointment of

Counsel dated June 2, 2009, (Docket #17). The decision to appoint counsel for an indigent

litigant is within the discretion of the district court. LaBeau v. Dakota, 815 F.Supp. 1074,

1076 (W.D. Mich. 1993) (citing Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dept., 763 F.2d 757, 760

(6th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1036 (1985)). Appointment of counsel is not a

constitutional right. Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987). This

discretion rests upon a consideration of all the circumstances of the case, including the

plaintiff's finances, his efforts to obtain counsel, and most importantly, whether the plaintiff's

case appears to be meritorious. Henry at 760. 

The Court has no funds to pay attorney fees for an indigent litigant in civil matters.

Eight of the nine named defendants were successfully served with a summons and

complaint on May 21, 2009, and the Michigan Attorney General’s Office filed a Notice of

Appearance on their behalf on May 27, 2009 (Docket #7-15). No Answer to the Complaint

has been filed. Appointment of counsel would be premature until service is completed and

2:09-cv-11246-BAF-DAS Doc # 18 Filed 06/08/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 78
the viability of Plaintiff’s claim is determined. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Application for

Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. 

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Order but are

required to act within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in

Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and E.D.Mich.LR 72.1(d)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes

a waiver of any further right of appeal. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72. Filing of objections that raise some

issues but fail to raise others with specificity, will not preserve all the objections a party

might have to this Order. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(1), a copy of any objection is

to be served upon this Magistrate Judge. 

SO ORDERED.

s/Donald A. Scheer

DONALD A. SCHEER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DATED: June 8, 2009

______________________________________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on June 8, 2009 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the

Clerk of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically.

I hereby certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following non-registered ECF

participants on June 8, 2009: Mario Clarke.

s/Michael E. Lang 

Deputy Clerk to 

Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

(313) 234-5217

 

2:09-cv-11246-BAF-DAS Doc # 18 Filed 06/08/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 79
#### STATE of Missouri ex rel. Luciano RODRIGUEZ, Relator, v. The Honorable Evelyn BAKER, Circuit Judge, Respondent.

No. 70951.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Writ Division Four.

Sept. 3, 1996.

*962Leonard P. Cervantes & Frank Carretero, St. Louis, for Relator.

Rebecca C. Steward, Assistant City Counselor, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Relator has filed a petition for writ of prohibition against respondent alleging she was without jurisdiction to grant a motion for new trial. Respondent has filed suggestions in opposition.

The facts are undisputed. The law is clear. In the interest of justice as permitted by Rule 84.24, we dispense with a preliminary order, answer, further briefing and oral argument and issue a peremptory writ of prohibition. See, *State ex rel. National Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Seehorn,*354 Mo. 170, 188 S.W.2d 657, 660 (1945).

On May 15,1996, judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of relator and against defendant. On June 12, 1996, respondent-judge granted defendant an additional ten days in which to file his motion for new trial. Defendant filed his motion for new trial on June 21, 1996, 37 days after the entry of the judgment. On July 19, 1996, respondent judge granted defendant’s motion for new trial.

Rule 78.04 provides that a motion for new trial must be filed not later than thirty days after the entry of the judgment on a jury verdict. The time for filing a motion for new trial may not be extended by the court. Rule 44.01(b); *Citizens Bank of Dexter v. Hall Trailer Sales,*550 S.W.2d 233, 234 (Mo.App.1977). An untimely motion for new trial is a nullity. *Id.*In the absence of a timely filed motion for a new trial, the judgment became final on June 14, 1996. Rule 81.05(a). The trial court was without jurisdiction to grant defendant’s motion for new trial on July 19,1996.

Peremptory writ is ordered issued. Respondent is directed to set aside her order granting defendant’s motion for new trial.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2532

___________

Bruce Kilgore, *

*

Appellant, *

* On Appeal from the United

v. * States District Court for

* the Eastern District of

* Missouri.

Michael Bowersox, *

* [To be published]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 11, 1999

Filed: June 15, 1999 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD and HANSEN, Circuit

Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

The motion for stay of execution is denied. The application for a certificate of

appealability is denied. 

It is so ordered. 
2–

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-6 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 3416
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-6 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 3417
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-6 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 3418
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-232V

UNPUBLISHED

VERA LEFTRIDGE,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: March 16, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Jimmy A. Zgheib, Zgheib Sayad, P.C., White Plains, NY, for petitioner.

Zoe Wade, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On February 11, 2019, Vera Leftridge filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

December 2, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 10, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that “petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

with SIRVA of the right arm and that it meets the requirements of a Table injury claim for 

SIRVA stemming from the flu vaccination on December 2, 2017.” Id. at 4. Respondent 

further “did not identify any other causes for petitioner’s injury, and records show that 

she suffered the sequela of this injury for more than six months.” Id. at 4-5.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LYNNE TEER PETERSON,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-11222

v. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on January 29, 2010 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

On December 21, 2009, Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Lynne Teer

Peterson’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of

Social Security’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R

& R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and

the record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the thorough analysis of the Magistrate

Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.

Accordingly,

2:09-cv-11222-GER-CEB Doc # 18 Filed 01/29/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 429
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s

December 21, 2009 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R & R, Plaintiff’s

September 4, 2009 motion for summary judgment (docket #11) is DENIED, and

Defendant’s December 2, 2009 motion for summary judgment (docket #16) is

GRANTED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: January 29, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on February 1, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Ruth Brissaud 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-11222-GER-CEB Doc # 18 Filed 01/29/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 430
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino Charter Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Bradley W. Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 17th day of April, 2008.

BRADLEY W. MILLERBradley W. MillerChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer






























---
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
  x
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006ORo
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period from _________________ to _________________
 
  
 EQUITY ONE, INC.
 
  Maryland
    
    52-1794271(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 1600 N.E. Miami Gardens Drive, North Miami Beach, FL
    
    33179(Address of principal executive office)
    
    (Zip code)
 305) 947-1664
 
  Common Stock, $.01 Par Value
    
    New York Stock Exchange(Title of each class)
    
    (Name of exchange on which registered)
 None
 o x
 o x
 x o
 x
  x o o
 o x
   DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



##### 



Explanatory Note
  SIGNATURES
  Date: April 10, 2007
    EQUITY ONE, INC.By:
    /s/ Gregory R. AndrewsGregory R. AndrewsExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 EXHIBIT NO.
    
    DESCRIPTION12.1
    
    Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200231.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002