alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 11, 2014

p0604 

# Order

Clerk June 11, 2014

148677

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148677

COA: 309320

Menominee CC: 11

- 003373

- FH

PAUL ANDREW HERRON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appe aring to this Court that the

case of People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073) is pending on appeal before this Court

and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that case.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3932

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the waiting

period for disability benefits shall not be applicable in the case of a

disabled individual suffering from a terminal illness.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 1996

Mr. WISE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide

that the waiting period for disability benefits shall not

be applicable in the case of a disabled individual suffering from a terminal illness.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM WAITING PERIOD FOR DIS4 ABLED INDIVIDUALS SUFFERING FROM TER5 MINAL ILLNESS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

7 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(a)(1))

8 is amended, in clause (ii) thereof—
2

•HR 3932 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(I)’’ immediately after ‘‘but

2 only if’’, and

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘or (II) he has a terminal ill4 ness (as defined in subsection (e)),’’ immediately

5 after ‘‘the first month in which he is under such dis6 ability,’’.

7 (b) DEFINITION OF TERMINAL ILLNESS.—Section

8 223 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 423) is further amended by

9 adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

10 ‘‘Definition of Terminal Illness

11 ‘‘(e) As used in this section, the term ‘terminal ill12 ness’ means, in the case of any individual, a medically de13 terminable physical impairment which is expected to result

14 in the death of such individual within the next 12

15 months.’’.

16 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

17 The amendments made by this Act shall be effective

18 with respect to applications for disability insurance bene19 fits under section 223 of the Social Security Act filed—

20 (1) in or after the month in which this Act is

21 enacted, or

22 (2) before the month in which this Act is en23 acted if—

24 (A) notice of the final decision of the Sec25 retary of Health and Human Services has not
3

•HR 3932 IH

1 been given to the applicant before such month,

2 or

3 (B) the notice referred to in paragraph (1)

4 has been so given before such month but a civil

5 action with respect to such final decision is

6 commenced under section 205(g) of the Social

7 Security Act (whether before, in, or after such

8 month) and the decision in such civil action has

9 not become final before such month;

10 except that no monthly benefits under title II of the Social

11 Security Act shall be payable by reason of the amend12 ments made by this Act for any month before the month

13 in which this Act is enacted.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AWRAHA Y. DANIEL

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 2:09-cv-11282 

Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANIES, Magistrate R. Steven Whalen

a foreign corporation,

Defendant.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Based upon agreement between the parties, as evidenced by the signatures of their attorneys

below, and the Court being advised in the premises, it is hereby ordered that the case is dismissed

with prejudice and without costs, interest, expenses or attorneys’ fees to either of the parties. 

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: November 30, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

November 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

Approved as to form and substance.

Notice of entry waived.

s/Paul C. Woods

Attorney for Plaintiff

15565 Northland Drive, Suite 504 West

Southfield, Michigan 48075

(248) 569-0351

paul_woods2003@yahoo.com

P63995

s/Paul H. Johnson, Jr.

Attorneys for Defendant Allstate

27777 Franklin Road, Suite 1400

Southfield, Michigan 48034

(248) 356-8590

pjohnson@pjmpc.com

P26871

2:09-cv-11282-PJD-RSW Doc # 21 Filed 11/30/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 148
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel C. Sibley,Chief Financial Officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managinggeneral partner of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m OR 78o(d)); and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Date: August 20,, 2007 |
|------------------------|
|                   |
|                   | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley |   |
|                   | Daniel C. Sibley |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Alphonso D. CASON, Appellant.

No. WD 52276.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Emmett Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and LAURA DENVIR STITH and HOWARD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from a conviction of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          JURISDICTION OF
         SUBSIDIARY                          PARENT                INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
-----------------------------    ------------------------------    -----------------------------
<C>                              <C>                               <C>
A.C. Moore Incorporated          A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.    Delaware

Moorestown Finance, Inc.         A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.    Delaware

Blackwood Assets, Inc.           Moorestown Finance, Inc.          Delaware

A.C. Moore Urban Renewal, LLC    A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.    Delaware
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
(ALL AMOUNTS ARE STATED IN BRAZILIAN REAIS)
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1481000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1793000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    302000
<INVENTORY>                                     828000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5006000
<PP&E>                                        25592000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2171000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                48163000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         10836000
<BONDS>                                        2597000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                    31877000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  48163000
<SALES>                                       53650000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              55462000
<CGS>                                         19487000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 19487000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              40980000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              132000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (5027000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (43000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4984000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4984000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
#### SECURITY BANK OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ivel DOOMS and Della Dooms, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 19279.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

Sept. 28, 1994.

*711William W. Kirchoff, Kirchoff & Associates, Springfield, for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard L. Schnake, Neale, Newman, Bradshaw & Freeman, Springfield, for defendants-respondents.

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiff filed a petition on March 15,1993, seeking $7829.52 plus interest, attorneys fees and costs. Defendants signed a promissory note dated September 4, 1984, the payment of which was secured by a deed of trust. The deed of trust was foreclosed April 24, 1987, and plaintiff claimed the amount received through the foreclosure was $7829.52 less than the amount due on the note. Following nonjury trial plaintiff received judgment for $675 and interest. Plaintiff appeals, presenting one point relied on.

Review of this nonjury matter is under Rule 73.01(c). As that rule is interpreted, this court is to affirm the trial court’s determination unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, it erroneously declares the law or it erroneously applies the law. *Ross Farms, Inc. v. Moore,*873 S.W.2d 308, 309 (Mo.App.1994). On appellate review of a ease tried without a jury, “[d]ue regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to have judged the credibility of witnesses.” Rule 73.01(c)(2).

Plaintiff’s point is in two parts. It first contends “[t]he trial court improperly applied and declared Section 517.031.2 R.S.MO” Supp.1992. That contention has no merit as Chapter 517 is to “apply to the practice and procedure in civil cases originally filed before associate circuit judges”. § 517.011.1, RSMo Supp.1992.

In its reply brief plaintiff acknowledges this matter was not filed in the associate division of the circuit court. In that brief plaintiff argues that if § 517.031.2 does not apply, then Rule 55.08 does. A claim of error first set forth in a reply brief does not present an issue for appellate review. *Lytle v. Page,*591 S.W.2d 421, 426 (Mo.App.1979).

The remaining contention of plaintiff is that the trial court’s finding “is not supported by substantial evidence, and is against the weight of the evidence.” This court sets aside a judgment on the ground that it is against the weight of the evidence only with a firm belief that the judgment is wrong. *Goodnight v. Curry,*618 S.W.2d 278, 279 (Mo.App.1981). “Weight of the evidence” means its weight in probative value, not the quantity or amount of evidence. *Id.*The weight of the evidence is not determined by mathematics, but on its effect in inducing belief. *Id.*

The result reached by the trial court was consistent with plaintiffs records and the testimony of defendant Ivel Dooms. The trial court’s determination was supported by substantial evidence and we have no firm belief that the judgment was wrong.

The judgment is affirmed.

CROW and PARRISH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended January 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rohit
Singh, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
 
 
 Date:
March 9, 2009
 
 
 ROHIT
SINGH
 Rohit
Singh
 Chief
Accounting Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer and Director




-1-
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 14-12 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 14-12 Filed 06/12/09 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 14-12 Filed 06/12/09 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 4.21


 


(Summary Translation)


 


	Comprehensive credit agreement with Everbright Bank 
	Date of the Agreement	March 20, 2013
	Borrower (Party A)	Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd.
	Lender (Party B)	China Everbright Bank Chongqing Wanzhou Branch
	Maximum credit line and sublimits	
        RMB100 million consisting:-

        ordinary loan of RMB70 million; and

        bank acceptance of RMB30 million.

	Term of maximum credit	From March 20, 2013 to March 20, 2014
	Use of maximum and sublimits	
        Party A may apply for usage of the credit line in one or multiple
        times;

        It is a revolving credit facility unless otherwise
        prohibited by Party B.

	Interest rate and fees	Will be provided in separate agreements entered into by Party A and Party B.
	Adjustment of maximum and specific credit lines	
        Party B is entitled to adjust the maximum credit line,
        sublimits and         the         term of credit, and is entitled to cease to grant the comprehensive credit and unilaterally
        cease to grant the         unused           credit to Party A or withdraw part or all of the used credit and take other
        steps, if the following of Party         A occurs:

         

        1. Major change in the structure including material merger,
        acquisition, reorganization, dissolution which Party B deems may affect the repayment of loan;

        2. Change the application of loans without prior consent by
        Party B

	Guarantee	Guarantee shall be provided by Daqo Group Co., Ltd.
	Party A's covenants	
        Party A shall:

        1. Provide true and accurate financial reports, saving balance
        and other relevant operational materials to Party B;

        2. If Party A is a group client pursuant to the
        “Commercial Bank Group Client Risk Management Guideline”, provide         Party B         relevant         information         of
        any         connected         transactions         involving over 10% of its net assets;

        3. Notify Party B in advance for provision of guarantee to any
        third party, and such guarantee shall not affect its ability of timely repayment.

        4. Notify Party B of any material change of its financial status
        or legal proceedings which may affect its ability of timely repayment.

        5. Notify Party B of any asset reorganization or any
form of change in the ownership, or any dissolution, bankruptcy two months in advance and repay all the outstanding debts.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2189
ANTHONY E. HURLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus P.F.Z. PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; JACK KATZ, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1545-WDQ) Submitted: January 28, 2005 Decided: February 18, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony E. Hurley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth C. Honeywell, Jason Thomas Sayers, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony E. Hurley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claim against Defendants and denying his subsequent Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hurley v. P.F.Z. Prop., Inc. , No. CA-04-1545-WDQ (D. Md. filed June 30, 2004 & entered July 1, 2004; Aug. 3, 2004; Aug. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WORLD SERIES OF GOLF,
INC. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Joseph F.
Martinez, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the
 requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
 results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |     |                                         
|--------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | By: | /s/ Joseph F. Martinez                  
|                      |  |     |                                         
|                      |  |     | Joseph F. Martinez                      
|                      |  |     | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
|                      |  |     | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
|                      |  |     |                                         
|                     

This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                             POWER OF ATTORNEY


            KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned person
whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints David K. Moskowitz as
the true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent of the undersigned, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name, place and
stead of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of EchoStar DBS Corporation, a Colorado corporation, for
the year ended December 31, 1997, and any and all amendments thereto and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and
hereby grants to said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in connection therewith, as fully as to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

            Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Power Attorney has been signed by the following person in the
capacity and on the date indicated.

    Signature                      Title                             Date
    ---------                      -----                             ----

/s/ James DeFranco                Director                       March 27, 1998
-----------------------------
James DeFranco
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

      I certify that the periodic report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1
containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o (d)) and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the issuer.


                                        CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
                                        By: /s/ Howard W. Schwan
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Howard W. Schwan
                                            Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>

                               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

      I certify that the periodic report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1
containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o (d)) and that information contained in the periodic report on Form 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the issuer.


                                            CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
                                        By: /s/ Stephen M. Merrick
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stephen M. Merrick,
                                            Chief Financial Officer