alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to the “Letter of Intent” from
Beacon Global Partners, LLC; dated April 1, 2014 and executed by Davis, Bianco, Miller and Starr collectively on April 2, 2014.


 


The parties (Davis, Bianco, Miller and
Starr) collectively agree to amend the “Letter of Intent”, and intend for the following understanding regarding the Board
of Directors to be included in the Letter of Intent and any formal binding agreements that follow without condition.


 


	 	1)	“The Board of directors will consist of Davis, Bianco, Miller and Starr. Davis’ vote on the Board of Directors will account for 30%, Bianco’s vote will account for 30%, Millers vote will account for 20% and Starr’s vote will account for 20%.
	 	 	 
	 	2)	Collectively, Davis and Bianco will maintain 60% voting majority on the Board of Directors until BGP, LLC is able to close or the “Letter of Intent” terminates, whichever comes first.
	 	 	 
	 	3)	Collectively, Miller and Starr will hold 40% of the minority vote
	 	 	 
	 	4)	In the event something should happen to Davis, his vote in entirety shall pass uninterrupted to Bianco with all rights, and this notice shall serve as power of attorney for executing such and Bianco shall have the right without condition to vote on behalf of Davis. In the event something should happen to Bianco, his vote in entirety shall pass uninterrupted to Davis with all rights, and this notice shall serve as power of attorney for executing such and Davis shall have the right without condition to vote on behalf of Bianco.
	 	 	 
	 	5)	In the event something should happen to Miller, his vote in entirety shall pass uninterrupted to Starr with all rights, and this notice shall serve as power of attorney for executing such and Starr shall have the right without condition to vote on behalf of Miller. In the event something should happen to Starr, his vote in entirety shall pass uninterrupted to Miller with all rights, and this notice shall serve as power of attorney for executing such and Miller shall have the right without condition to vote on behalf of Starr.
	 	 	 
	 	6)	Any future Board Members will serve for a term limit not to exceed three years, or until closing, whichever comes first.
	 	 	 
	 	7)	This understanding shall not change, and will be included in any future agreement.
	 	 	 
	 	8)	No other changes to the Letter of Intent are implied or follow.


 




    	 



    	 



    


 


We agree and affix our signatures


 


	 	FOR THE COMPANY	DATE	4/8/2014
	 	 	 	 
	 	CFO	DATE	4/8/2014
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	DATE	4/8/2014
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	DATE	4/8/2014
#### Douglas SINAMON, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70019.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 22, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for movanVappellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent/respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11309]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of MISSOURI (FEMA-1773-DR), dated 06/25/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2008 through 07/18/2008.                    

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

07/25/2008.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/25/2008                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of MISSOURI, dated 06/25/2008, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*

Audrain, Carroll, Chariton, Christian, Howard, Linn, Macon, Miller, Morgan, Pettis, Ray, Shelby, Stone, Sullivan, Taney, Vernon.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-17765 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPHE ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff,

vs.

EAGLE ROCK ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

a Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

/

Case No. 09-11704

Hon. Robert H. Cleland

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

SCHEDULING ORDER

On June 11, 2009, the Court held a scheduling conference with counsel for Plaintiff

Armstrong and Defendant Eagle Rock. The following Order memorializes the decisions reached

at that conference.

1. Discovery in this case, including Rule 26(a) initial disclosures, is stayed pending

the Court’s disposition of said motions.

2. Armstrong has expressed the possibility that he will seek leave to amend his

complaint for the purpose of adding a claim under 17 U.S.C. §1101. If Armstrong chooses to

seek such leave, he may do so within 10 days after the Court’s disposition of the dispositive

motion filed by Eagle Rock on July 2, 2009. Otherwise, the claim shall be considered waived.

If Armstrong seeks such leave, Eagle Rock shall be entitled to file an opposing brief. Any

statute of limitations period applicable to said claim shall be considered to have been tolled as of

June 11, 2009.

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 22, 2009

2:09-cv-11704-RHC-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 86
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this

date, July 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

We stipulate to entry of the foregoing order:

/s/ with consent of Jeffrey P. Thennisch /s/ Brian D. Wassom

Dobrusin & Thennisch, PC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: Jeffrey P. Thennisch (P51499)

 Hattem A. Beydoun (P66071)

29 W. Lawrence St., Suite 210

Pontiac, MI 48342

Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

By: Herschel P. Fink (P13427)

 Brian D. Wassom (P60381)

2290 First National Building

660 Woodward Avenue

Detroit, MI 48226-3506

(313) 465-7400

hpf@honigman.com

bdw@honigman.com

2:09-cv-11704-RHC-RSW Doc # 12 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 87
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 370

To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. STUMP introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on House Oversight

A BILL

To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42

4 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq.) is repealed.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES F-3 AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,304)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,048
<PP&E>                                           5,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,574)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,327
<BONDS>                                         23,638
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,406)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,562
<SALES>                                          1,775
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,304
<CGS>                                            1,598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,729)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,729
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.52)


</TABLE>
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 66-29    Filed 11/19/10   Page 1 of 4

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 66-29    Filed 11/19/10   Page 2 of 4

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 66-29    Filed 11/19/10   Page 3 of 4

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 66-29    Filed 11/19/10   Page 4 of 4
1

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN ALLEN THOMASON, #376662,

 

Petitioner, Civil No. 2:09-11012 

Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

v.

NICK LUDWICK,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S "MOTION TO REINSTATE

MOTIONS PREVIOUSLY ADJUDICATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE" [dkt. #37]

Petitioner Steven Allen Thomason filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. He was convicted in Oakland County Circuit Court of

second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MICH. COMP. LAWS §750.520c(1)(a). Petitioner is

presently incarcerated at Mid-Michigan Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan. He was

sentenced to four years nine months to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Pending before the

Court is Petitioner's "Motion to Reinstate Motions Previously Adjudicated Without Prejudice"

[dkt. #37]. For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the motion.

On June 19, 2009, this Court issued an order disposing of eleven motions filed by

Petitioner. The motions sought discovery, early consideration of Petitioner's substantive

claims, release on bond, an evidentiary hearing, and a writ of mandamus. The Court

concluded that most of the arguments contained in the motions were being raised

prematurely. Subsequently, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition on

exhaustion grounds, and Petitioner responded by filing an amended petition that deleted

2:09-cv-11012-GER-DAS Doc # 39 Filed 05/13/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 911
2

his unexhausted claims. The amended petition was filed on March 3, 2011, and an answer

was filed by Respondent on April 15, 2011.

 Petitioner's present motion requests the Court to reconsider his prior motions before

the Court considers the amended petition on the merits. This case has been pending since

March 18, 2009. It is not in the interest of justice to further delay adjudication of the case

by allowing the sort of piece-meal litigation suggested in Petitioner's prior motions. The

Court will address the issues denied without prejudice in Petitioner's prior motions when

it considers the case. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's "Motion to Reinstate Motions Previously

Adjudicated Without Prejudice" [dkt. #37] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED. 

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: May 13, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on May 13, 2011, by electronic mail and upon Steven Thomason, ##376662, Mid-Michigan

Correctional Facility, 8201 N. Croswell Road, St. Louis, MI 8880 by ordinary mail.

s/Ruth A. Gunther 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-11012-GER-DAS Doc # 39 Filed 05/13/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 912
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BYRON FELTON, 

C/A # 2:09-cv-12063 

 Plaintiff, Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

-vsCIVIC PROPERTY AND CASUALTY 

COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT

WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS

 The parties hereto, by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate 

that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. 

/s/Allen J. Counard /s/Mark S. Hayduk

ALLEN J. COUNARD [P12268] MARK S. HAYDUK (P25850) 

Counard & Heilmann, PLLC Hayduk, Andrews & Brucker, P.C. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

2320 W. Jefferson Ave. 615 Griswold, Ste. 1515 

Trenton, MI 48183 Detroit, MI 48226 

734/ 692-0033 313/ 962-4500 

Fax/ 692-0925 Fax/ 964-6577 

acounard@candhlawfirm.com mshayduk@haydukandrews.com

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: November 12, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on 

November 12, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

2:09-cv-12063-PJD-DAS Doc # 17 Filed 11/12/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 57
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SAMUEL TRAVIS BURBA,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

 09-CV-11961

vs.

 PAUL D. BORMAN

NICK LUDWICK, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING DEFENDANT LUDWICK’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

This is a prisoner civil rights case. Plaintiff Samuel Burba, proceeding pro se, is suing St.

Louis Correctional Facility Warden Nick Ludwick and five unknown corrections officers. Plaintiff

claims that Defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to protect him during an

assault perpetrated by another prisoner. 

On August 28, 2009, Defendant Ludwick filed a Motion to Dismiss. See docket entry 17.

On February 4, 2010, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk issued a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) in which he recommends that Defendant Ludwick’s motion be granted. See docket entry

24.

Plaintiff filed objections to the R&R on February 22, 2010. See docket entry 25. The Court

reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which a specific objection has been made. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having done so, the Court finds, over Plaintiff’s

objections, that Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk has reached the proper conclusions for the proper
2

reasons. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk’s R&R dated February 4, 2010, is

accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections to the R&R are overruled.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ludwick’s Motion to Dismiss [docket entry

17] is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall proceed against the remaining defendants.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 1, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

March 1, 2010.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
2:08-cv-15283-MOB-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 12/29/08 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 1
2:08-cv-15283-MOB-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 12/29/08 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 2
2:08-cv-15283-MOB-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 12/29/08 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 3
2:08-cv-15283-MOB-VMM Doc # 1 Filed 12/29/08 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 4
#### Edward LITTLE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 69854.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17387]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-00739, 00739A]


Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee Brewery, and Pabst Brewing 
Company, Milwaukee, WI; Notice of Revised Determination on 
Reconsideration

    On April 29, 1996, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and 
former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on May 16, 1996 (61 FR 24816).
    The findings show that the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, plants experienced 
declines in employment in January of 1996.
    New findings on reconsideration show that United States imports of 
beer increased both absolutely and as a percentage of U.S. production 
in 1995 compared with 1994 and also increased absolutely and relatively 
in April through March, 1995-1996, compared with the same period one 
year earlier. United States imports from Canada and Mexico were lower 
but show the same patterns.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers at Miller Brewing 
Company, Milwaukee Brewery, and Pabst Brewing Company, both of 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, were adversely affected by increased imports from 
Mexico and Canada of articles like or directly competitive with beer 
produced at the subject firms. In accordance with the provisions of the 
Act, I make the following revised determination.

    All workers of Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee Brewery (NAFTA-
00739), and Pabst Brewing Company (NAFTA-00739A), both of Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after December 18, 1994, are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA 
under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 26th day of June 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-17387 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### STATE of MISSOURI, Respondent, v. Freddie J. JOHNSON, Appellant. Freddie J. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48222, WD 50101.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 31, 1995.

*871James C. Cox, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from jury convictions, sentences therefrom and denial of Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
IIA

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3900

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 29, 1996

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

AN ACT

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide

greater planting flexibility, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. INCREASED PLANTING FLEXIBILITY.—

4 Section 118 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7
2

HR 3900 RFS

1 U.S.C. 7218) is amended by adding the following new

2 paragraph to subsection (b)(2):

3 ‘‘(D) by a producer on contract acreage

4 following a crop that fails due to conditions be5 yond the producer’s control.’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection

7 118(b)(2) is amended:

8 (a) at the end of paragraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’;

9 and

10 (b) in clause (ii) of paragraph (C), by striking ‘‘vege11 table.’’ and inserting ‘‘vegetable; or’’.

12 SEC. 3. CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM REGU13 LATIONS.—Not later than September 15, 1996, the Sec14 retary shall issue regulations to implement the Conserva15 tion Reserve Program (16 U.S.C. 3831 et seq.), as amend16 ed by section 332 of the Federal Agricultural Improve17 ment and Reform Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–127,

18 April 4, 1996).

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.