alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3703

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the same insurance

reserve treatment to financial guaranty insurance as applies to mortgage

guaranty insurance, lease guaranty insurance, and tax-exempt bond

insurance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 24, 1996

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

the same insurance reserve treatment to financial guaranty insurance as applies to mortgage guaranty insurance, lease guaranty insurance, and tax-exempt bond

insurance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INSURANCE RESERVE RULES FOR FINANCIAL

4 GUARANTY INSURANCE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 832(e)(6) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
2

•HR 3703 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘or a company which writes

2 financial guaranty insurance’’ after ‘‘section 103’’ in

3 the first sentence, and

4 (2) in the second sentence—

5 (A) by inserting ‘‘and to financial guaranty

6 insurance’’ after ‘‘section 103;’’,

7 (B) by inserting ‘‘financial guaranty insur8 ance or’’ after ‘‘in the case of’’, and

9 (C) by inserting ‘‘such financial guaranty

10 or’’ after ‘‘revenues related to’’.

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for

12 section 832(e)(6) of such Code is amended by inserting

13 ‘‘; FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE’’ after ‘‘OBLIGA14 TIONS’’.

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

17 December 31, 1995.

Æ
<PAGE>   1


                                 EXHIBIT 10.44

         SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO EXHIBIT 10.43


1.       Adjustable Rate Note dated August 26, 1996 in the amount of
         $1,050,000.00 from Jameson Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial
         Services, Inc. for Selma, Alabama.

2.       Adjustable Rate Note dated August 26, 1996 in the amount of
         $1,050,000.00 from Jameson Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial
         Services, Inc. for Florence, Alabama.

3.       Adjustable Rate Note dated August 26, 1996 in the amount of
         $1,050,000.00 from Jameson Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial
         Services, Inc. for Albertville, Alabama.

4.       Adjustable Rate Note dated August 26, 1996 in the amount of
         $1,050,000.00 from Jameson Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial
         Services, Inc. for Arab, Alabama.

5.       Adjustable Rate Note dated August 26, 1996 in the amount of
         $1,050,000.00 from Jameson Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial
         Services, Inc. for Eufaula, Alabama.
Exhibit 21.1
                                   
                              TRISM, INC.
                      Subsidiaries of TRISM, Inc.
                                   
                                   
                                   
Trism Secured Transportation, Inc.                    Delaware
     
    Tri-State Motor Transit Co.                       Delaware
     
       Aero Body and Truck Equipment Company, Inc.,   Delaware
       Tri-State Transportation Service, Inc.         Missouri
     
    Diablo Systems Incorporated
       d/b/a/ Diablo Transportation, Inc.             California
     
    Emerald Leasing, Inc.                             Nevada
     
    McGil Special Services, Inc.                      Delaware
   
    Trism Eastern, Inc.
       d/b/a/ C.I. Whitten Transfer                   Delaware
     
Trism Heavy Haul, Inc.                                Delaware
     
    Trism Specialized Carriers, Inc.                  Georgia
       Trism Special Services, Inc.                   Georgia
     
    E.L. Powell & Sons Trucking Co., Inc.             Oklahoma
     
Trism Transport, Inc.                                 Delaware

    Trism Transport Services, Inc.                    Utah
     
       EFB, Inc.                                      Delaware
     
TRISM Logistics, Inc.                                 New Jersey
     
Trism Equipment, Inc.                                 Delaware
     
TRISM Maintenance Services, Inc.                      Delaware
     
Transportation Recovery Systems, Inc.                 Delaware



                                43
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3871

AN ACT

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment comnizations. position rule for certain health maintenance orga-
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3871

AN ACT

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition

rule for certain health maintenance organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3871 EH

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT

2 RULE FOR CERTAIN MANAGED CARE ORGANI3 ZATIONS.

4 The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the

5 Social Security Act is waived—

6 (1) with respect to Catholic Health Services

7 Plan of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. (doing business

8 as Fidelis Health Plan) and Managed Healthcare

9 Systems of New York, Inc., for contract periods

10 through January 1, 1999, and

11 (2) with respect to Health Partners of Philadel12 phia, Inc., for contract periods through December

13 31, 1999.

Passed the House of Representatives September 4,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

D’Juan Garrett

Plaintiff,

v.

John Presesnik, 

Defendant.

 /

CASE NUMBER: 09-11076

HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS

MAG. JUDGE PAUL KOMIVES

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On May 4, 2012 Magistrate Judge Komives issued a Report and

Recommendation [Doc.20], recommending that Petitioner’s Motion for Relief Under

60(B)(6) [Doc. 18] be denied. Neither party filed objections within the fourteen day

period pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Thus, the Court

adopts the Report and Recommendation. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED.

 S/Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: June 20, 2012

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

June 20, 2012.

S/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11076-VAR-PJK Doc # 21 Filed 06/20/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 801
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00276

- CV
Ex parte H.E.A.
On Appeal from the 440th District Court of Coryell County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. DEC

- 19

- 50433

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, con cludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , and it is ordered to pay all co sts of the appeal from which it is not exempt by statu t e

. We f ur ther order this decision certified below for observance. June 9, 2022
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 10.42

         SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO EXHIBIT 10.41


1.       Loan Modification Agreement dated August 26, 1996 between Jameson
         Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial Services, Inc. for Selma, Alabama.

2.       Loan Modification Agreement dated August 26, 1996 between Jameson
         Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial Services, Inc. for Florence,
         Alabama.

3.       Loan Modification Agreement dated August 26, 1996 between Jameson
         Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial Services, Inc. for Albertville,
         Alabama.

4.       Loan Modification Agreement dated August 26, 1996 between Jameson
         Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial Services, Inc. for Arab, Alabama.

5.       Loan Modification Agreement dated August 26, 1996 between Jameson
         Alabama, Inc. and Empire Financial Services, Inc. for Eufaula,
         Alabama.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-162940, 333-156239, 333-149741, 333-136473, 333-128923, 333-115840, 333-110264, 333-44954, 333-92631, 333-92629, 333-57331, 333-32911 and 333-08863 on Form S-8 of our
reports dated February 19, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of FEI Company and subsidiaries (the Company) (which report includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of FASB ASC 740, Income
Taxes (formerly Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP         
|February 19, 2010 Portland, Oregon



EX  23
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-37347 and 333-57500) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive
Plan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, International Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and EveryWare Replacement Option Plan of Pervasive Software Inc. of our
report dated July 12, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and related financial statement schedule of Pervasive Software Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2001.

                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Austin, Texas
September 24, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

______________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-20130

CHARLES ALOKWU,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER DIRECTING THE GOVERNMENT TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

Defendant Charles Alokwu has filed a “Motion for Compassionate Release.” 

(ECF No. 25.) He argues that the health risk presented by the Coronavirus Disease 

(“COVID-19”) at his location of confinement, warrants compassionate release under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).

The government filed a response opposing the motion but did not state 

Defendant’s COVID-19 vaccination status. (ECF No. 30.) The Bureau of Prisons 

(“BOP”) has made substantial progress distributing COVID-19 vaccines to the federal 

prison population around the country and to date has administered over 169,000 doses 

to staff and prisoners at BOP facilities. COVID-19: Coronavirus, Federal Bureau of 

Prisons, https://www.bop.gov/coronavirus/ (last visited May 14, 2021). 

Defendant’s vaccination status is a consideration in determining whether 

compassionate release is warranted. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) (requiring that a 

prisoner have “extraordinary and compelling” circumstances to obtain compassionate 

release). 
2

Whether Defendant is fully vaccinated, or has declined an offered opportunity to 

become vaccinated, or has not been afforded such opportunity at all, that fact will 

impact the court’s analysis of his motion to reduce sentence. Thus, the court will direct 

the Government to file a supplemental brief stating whether Defendant has been offered 

a COVID-19 vaccine and whether he has been vaccinated.

1 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the government is DIRECTED to file a supplemental brief 

by May 31, 2021, stating whether or not Defendant has been offered a COVID-19 

vaccine and, if so, whether he has received a COVID-19 vaccine.

 s/Robert H. Cleland / 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: May 18, 2021

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record 

on this date, May 18, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa Wagner / 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(810) 292-6522

S:\Cleland\Cleland\AAB\Opinions and Orders\Criminal\09-20130.ALOKWU.OrderDirectingSupplementalBrief.AAB.RHC.docx

1 No extraneous records need—nor should—be filed on the public docket in 

support of this attestation. In the interests of expediency, and to avoid needless

documents filed under sealed, the court will accept the Government’s representation, 

consistent with counsel’s Rule 11 obligations.
Exhibit No. 15
Headway Corporate Resources, Inc.
Form 10-KSB
File No. 0-23170



                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement  (Form  S-3  No. 333-08615) and related  Prospectus  of
HEADWAY CORPORATE RESOURCES, INC., of our report dated March  14,
1997,  with respect to the 1996 consolidated financial statements
of  Headway  Corporate Resources, Inc., included in  this  Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 1997
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3890

To provide for the withdrawal of most favored nation status from Iran,

Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and to provide for the restoration of such status

with respect to Syria if the President determines that Syria is participating in the Middle East peace process in good faith.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 1996

Mr. SCARBOROUGH (for himself, Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. PORTER, Ms. PELOSI,

Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr. LIPINSKI) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for the withdrawal of most favored nation status

from Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Syria, and to provide for

the restoration of such status with respect to Syria if

the President determines that Syria is participating in

the Middle East peace process in good faith.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WITHDRAWAL OF MOST FAVORED NATION STA4 TUS FROM IRAN, IRAQ, LIBYA, AND SYRIA.

5 (a) WITHDRAWAL OF MFN STATUS.—Except as pro6 vided in subsection (b), nondiscriminatory treatment shall

7 not apply with respect to any goods that—
2

•HR 3890 IH

1 (1) are the product of Iran, Iraq, Libya, or

2 Syria; and

3 (2) are entered into the customs territory of the

4 United States on or after the 15th day after the

5 date of the enactment of this Act.

6 (b) RESTORATION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREAT7 MENT WITH RESPECT TO SYRIA.—Notwithstanding sub8 section (a), the President may restore nondiscriminatory

9 treatment to goods that are the product of Syria 30 days

10 after the President certifies to the Congress that the Gov11 ernment of Syria is participating in the Middle East peace

12 process in good faith.

Æ
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Glen Zinn, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp.

 

Date: May ___, 2013

 

By:	*/s/ Glen Zinn*	

Glen Zinn

Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY HAYES,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 2:08-CV-14807

HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WARDEN ZYCH,

Respondent,

_______________________________/

JUDGMENT

The above entitled matter having come before the Court on a Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus, Honorable George Caram Steeh, a United States

District Judge, presiding, and in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion

and Order entered this date.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: s/Josephine Chaffee 

 DEPUTY COURT CLERK

Dated: October 7, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS EDMUNDS,

Plaintiff,

v.

BOARD OF CONTROL OF EASTERN

MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY, LIZBETH

STEVENS, SARAH GINSBERG, WILLIE

CUPPLES, CAROLE WOOD GORENFLO,

RONALD HOODIN, and LIDIA LEE,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-11648

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For

the reasons set forth in an opinion issued this date,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants’ Motion for

Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: December 23, 2009

copies to:

Marlo D. Smith, Esq.

Debra McCulloch, Esq.

Claire S. Harrison, Esq.

2:09-cv-11648-PJD-PJK Doc # 21 Filed 12/23/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 453
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer   I, Hank Cohn, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BBN Global Consulting, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: September 9, 2008  /s/ Hank Cohn Hank Cohn Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Wyeth,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:09−cv−11726−LPZ−MKM

Hon. Lawrence P Zatkoff

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries,

Limited, et al.,

Defendant(s).

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that a copy of the Notice(s) of Appeal filed in this case and this Certificate

of Service was served upon:

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Potter Stewart U.S. Courthouse

100 East Fifth Street, Fifth Floor

Cincinnati, OH 45202−3988

and all interested parties, by electronic means or first class U.S. mail, on March 31, 2010.

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT

By: s/ B. Socia 

Deputy Clerk

Dated: March 31, 2010
NUMBER 13-21-00107-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF 

ANGELICA MARIA HINOJOSA AND JEREMY MATTHEW HINOJOSA 

AND IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.H., A CHILD

 

On appeal from the 94th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant Jeremy Matthew Hinojosa, proceeding pro se, attempted to perfect an 

appeal from trial court cause number 2020-FAM-0508-C in the 94th District Court of 

Nueces County, Texas. On April 22, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that 

his notice of appeal was defective because it failed to comply with Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 9.5(d),(e), 25.1(d)(1),(2),(4), and 25.1(e). See TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.5(d),(e), 25.1(d)(1),(2),(4), 25.1(e). The Clerk directed appellant to correct his notice of 
2

appeal within thirty days and advised appellant that the matter would be referred to the 

Court if appellant failed to comply. See id. R. 37.1. The Clerk also directed appellant to 

pay the filing fee for the appeal within ten days.

On June 2, 2021, the Clerk advised appellant that he was delinquent in remitting 

the filing fee and notified him that the appeal would be dismissed if the fee was not paid 

within ten days. See id. R. 42.3(c). That same day, the Clerk also advised appellant that 

the defects in his notice of appeal had not been corrected and informed him that the 

appeal would be dismissed if the defects were not cured within ten days. To date, 

appellant has not corrected the defects in his notice of appeal, paid the filing fee for the 

appeal, or otherwise responded to the Clerk’s directives. 

We are to construe the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure reasonably, yet 

liberally, so that the right to appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely 

necessary to effectuate the purpose of a rule. Republic Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Mex-Tex, 

Inc., 150 S.W.3d 423, 427 (Tex. 2004); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 616–17 

(Tex. 1997); Jardon v. Pfister, 593 S.W.3d 810, 820 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2019, no pet.). 

Nevertheless, this Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for “want of prosecution”

or “because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of [the] appellate rules, 

a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a 

specified time.” TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c); see Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521 

S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 

applicable law, is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, we 
3

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c); Smith, 521 S.W.3d at 76.

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

22nd day of July, 2021.