alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Brandon Vasquez FLORES, a/k/a Brandon Vasquez, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 13-95-539-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

Nov. 8, 1996.

Fred Jimenez, Ricardo R. Amador, II, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

David H. Aken, Jr., County Attorney, Sin-ton, for appellee.

Before SEERDEN, C.J., and DORSEY and CHAVEZ, JJ.

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

In a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of unlawfully possessing a prohibited weapon. The trial judge assessed punishment at 60 days in the county jail. By a single point of error, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The information alleged that appellant intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carried on and about his person an illegal weapon, to-wit: knuckles. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 46.05(a)(6) (Vernon 1994).

Appellant contends that the instrument in question is not “knuckles” as defined by the Penal Code. “Knuckles” means any instrument that consists of finger rings or guards made of a hard substance and that is de*859signed, made, or adapted for the purpose of inflicting serious bodily injury or death by striking a person with a fist enclosed in the knuckles. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 46.01(8) (Vernon 1994).

The instrument has a primary metal rod with two parallel metal prongs which protrude out of one side of the rod at ninety degree angles. A person could place the primary metal rod in his palm and make a fist so that the two metal prongs extend out of his palm between his .fingers. In his appellate brief, appellant describes the instrument as a “self-defense martial arts device” and “ninja key ring.”

Appellant’s specific complaint is that the instrument does not have finger rings or guards and, therefore, is not “knuckles.” We agree that the instrument does not have “finger rings.” But, we disagree with appellant’s claim that the instrument does not have finger guards. The instrument has two protruding prongs which are made of a hard substance. These two protruding metal prongs can guard the fingers, much like quills guard the soft tissue of a porcupine. While the prongs do not enclose the fingers as rings would, they certainly guard the fingers. Below is a copy of the device in question.



Accordingly, we find that the trial court, as finder of fact, could have concluded rationally, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the instrument meets the statutory definition of “knuckles.” Appellant’s sole point of error is overruled.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Aspect L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz, Chief
Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Lee Horwitz

Name:		Lee Horwitz
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 9, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHALON LINDSLEY,

Plaintiff, No. 09-CV-11775-DT

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES,

INC., et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

At a session of said Court, held in the

 U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

 on November 22, 2010 

 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

 United States District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on the October 6, 2010 Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder recommending that

the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, with prejudice, for want of prosecution; and no

timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation having been filed;

and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the

Court’s file of this action and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and

Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Complaint this case should be dismissed in its entirety, with

prejudice, and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation of October 6, 2010 [Dkt. # 45] be, and hereby is, adopted by this

Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED, in its entirety,

with prejudice.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: November 22, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

November 22, 2010, by electronic mail and upon Chalon Lindsley, 504 E. Columbia, Apt.

13, Battle Creek, MI 49014-5445 by ordinary mail.

s/Ruth A. Gunther 

Case Manager
Amyris 2013 10-K Ex 10.93 TateLyleMODIFICATION




MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


This Modification Agreement (“Modification”) made as of this 16th day of September 2013, by and between Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas LLC (“Tate & Lyle”), a Delaware limited liability company, formerly Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas, Inc., and Amyris, Inc. (“Amyris”), a Delaware corporation, modifies the Settlement Agreement, Termination Agreement, and Mutual Release (“Settlement”) dated the 25th day of June 2013.


WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Settlement in order to finally settle and compromise the Dispute, the Arbitration, and the Litigation as defined therein, and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to modify the Settlement by this Modification.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions, and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


1.    Pursuant to Section 19 of the Settlement, Section 1.c of the Settlement is entirely deleted and wholly replaced by the following:


“2,600,000 on or before 12 p.m. Central Time on September 27, 2013”


2.    The Modification to the Settlement as stated above shall not be construed in any manner as a waiver by Tate & Lyle of its rights and remedies under the Settlement or as otherwise available.  For the purpose of avoiding doubt, Tate & Lyle may immediately reinstitute the Litigation and/or Arbitration in the event Amyris fails to make payment as specified under the Settlement and as modified herein or in the event Amyris otherwise demonstrates non-compliance with the Settlement or this Modification.


3.     Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Settlement.


4.    Other than as expressly modified herein, all provisions of the Settlement remain in full effect and unchanged by this Modification.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Modification on the day and year first written above.


	
					
	TATE & LYLE INGREDIENTS AMERICAS LLC
	 
	AMYRIS, Inc.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/
	 
	By:
	/s/

	 
	Name:Matthew D. Wineinger
	 
	 
	Name: Nicholas Khadder

	 
	Title: President, Bulk Ingredients
	 
	 
	Title: Interim General Counsel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                          30,437
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,437
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                469,050
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   461,597
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75


</TABLE>
4:09-mj-30284-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 17
4:09-mj-30284-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

The National Endowment for the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Humanities Panel will be held at the Old Post Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

      ( print page 45792)    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, August 11, 2008, at 9 a.m.-3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held in Room M-07 at the Old Post Office, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael P. McDonald, Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Endowment for the Humanities, Washington, DC 20506; telephone (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the Endowment's TDD terminal on (202) 606-8282.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The purpose of the meeting of the Humanities Panel is to solicit and collect advice and comments on the Endowment's EDSITEment program. EDSITEment is an online educational partnership between the Endowment and the Verizon foundation, Thinkfinity.org and can be accessed at                     *http://edsitement.neh.gov/​*. The meeting is open to the public. A 10-minute time slot is reserved for public comments at the end of the meeting.                

Michael P. McDonald,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

 [FR Doc. E8-17982 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS*

I,

Robert Nichols, certify that:

1)

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sun American Bancorp;

2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4)

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Intentionally omitted.

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5)

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting

Date: March 29, 2006

|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ROBERTNICHOLS                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. APP. 2, section 10(a)(2), notice is hereby given that the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) National Advisory Council (NAC) will hold a public meeting on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 2 p.m. (eastern). The purpose of the meeting is to discuss and outline FY 2008 projects for the NAC. 

                    The meeting will be open to the public. Anyone wishing to participate must contact Mina Wales or Adrienne Abney-Cole by phone or e-mail in order to be added to the agenda. Mina Wales, NAC Designated Federal Officer, 202-205-7180,                     *Mina.Wales@sba.gov*                     or Adrienne Abney-Cole, NAC Committee Management Specialist, 202-205-6742,                     *Adrienne.Abney-Cole@sba.gov.*

The meeting will take place using an audio conferencing system. To participate, please call our toll free conferencing service at 1-866-740-1260 and enter access code 3711001 at the prompt. 

                    For more information about the National Advisory Council, please visit our Web site at                     *http://www.sba.gov/​nac/​index.html.*

Cherylyn Lebon, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-1768 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CH4 Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2008


/s/ Larry Sostad
-----------------------------------------
Larry Sostad, Principal Financial Officer
Supreme Court of the United States

Office of the Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

November 18, 2013

Clerk

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

524 Potter Stewart Courthouse 

100 East Fifth Street

Cincinnati, OH 45202

Re: Joseph Whiting

v. United States

No. 13-7021

(Your No. 11-1349)

Dear Clerk:

The Court today entered the following order in the above-entitled case:

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

Scott S. Harris

Clerk of the Court

(202) 479-3011

2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM Doc # 2517 Filed 11/18/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 18569 Case: 11-1349 Document: 006111885993 Filed: 11/18/2013 Page: 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET FOR THE MONTHS OF JANUARY AND

 FEBRUARY, 2010, BEFORE THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN*

Listed below are the cases on this Court's trial docket for the months of November and

December, 2009. Counsel will be notified when their case reaches No. 5. After such

notice, counsel should be prepared to begin trial any time on 48 hours notice. It is

counsel's responsibility in all cases after they have been so notified to contact my clerk,

Marilyn Orem, at 234-5147, to ascertain the status of the trial docket. Unless otherwise

notified, this Court commences trial at 8:45 a.m. PLEASE BE PROMPT!

1. 08-14136 SHAKOOR V. EVANS, ET.AL

2. 08-14318 CONOCOPHILLIPS V. CONVENIENCE DEPOT, ET.AL

3. 08-14922 FIALKA-FELDMAN V. OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

4. 08-14117 SMITH V. MICHIGAN TUBE SWAGERS & FABRICATORS

5. 09-10981 PFISTER V. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ET.AL

6. 09-11648 EDMUNDS V. BOARD OF CONTROL OF EASTERN MI. UNIVERSITY

7. 09-11366 N&W COMMODITIES V. USA

8. 09-11949 KAID V. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: December 1, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 1, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

*PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT TRIAL WILL NOT BEGIN BEFORE THE FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE.

IF THERE IS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PENDING, FINAL PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE WILL BE RESCHEDULED APPROXIMATELY 10 DAYS AFTER ANY

DECISION ON SUCH MOTION.

2:09-cv-11949-PJD-MKM Doc # 16 Filed 12/01/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 86
No. 72-6216.

#### Anderson *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Name of 100% Owned Subsidiaries and Jurisdiction in Which Organized

|1.  |  | FEI FSC Ltd. (Barbados)                                
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|2.  |  | FEI Asia Company (Oregon)                              
|3.  |  | FEI Electron Optics International B.V. (Netherlands)   
|4.  |  | FEI Deutschland GmbH (Germany)                         
|5.  |  | FEI Company Japan Ltd. (Japan)                         
|6.  |  | FEI Australia Pty Ltd. (Australia)                     
|7.  |  | Focused Electrons and Ions (FEI) AG (Switzerland)      
|8.  |  | FEI Belgium N.V. (Belgium)                             
|9.  |  | FEI Czech Republic s.r.o. (Czech Republic)             
|10. |  | FEI Hong Kong Co., Ltd. (Hong Kong)                    
|11. |  | FEI Company of U.S.A. (SE Asia) P.t.e. Ltd. (Singapore)
|12. |  | FEI Denmark A/S (Denmark)                              
|13. |  | FEI Italia S.r.l. (Italy)                              
|14. |  | FEI Electron Optics B.V. (Netherlands)                 
|15. |  | FEI France SAS (France)                                
|16. |  | FEI Microscopia Espana SA (Spain)                      
|17. |  | FEI Particle Beam Systems Oesterreich GmbH (Austria)   
|18. |  | FEI Europe B.V. (Netherlands)                          
|19. |  | FEI Norway AS (Norway)                                 
|20. |  | FEI Sweden AB (Sweden)                                 
|21. |  | FEI UK Ltd. (United Kingdom)                           
|22. |  | FEI Systems Canada Inc. (Canada)                       
|23. |  | FEI Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)                       

Name of Subsidiaries less than 100% Owned

---

QuickLinks
#### Shawn HOFFMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50645.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Sept. 19, 1995.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LAURA DENVIR STITH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Hoffman appeals the denial of a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Judgment and Sentences, filed pursuant to Rule 24.035, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).