alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



<PAGE>


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tongji  Healthcare  Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Yun-hui Yu, the
President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Wei-dong  Huang,  the  Principal
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                          TONGJI HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.



November 12, 2007                           /s/ Yun-hui Yu
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Yun-hui Yu, President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer


November 12, 2007                          /s/ Wei-dong Huang
                                          ------------------------------------
                                          Wei-dong Huang, Principal Financial
                                                Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Crestwood Midstream Partners LP;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ William G. ManiasWilliam G. ManiasSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer of
Crestwood Gas Services GP LLC, General Partner of
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTEMES, SA 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 09-cv-10534 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

KEITH CHILDRESS, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER TERMINATING PLAINTIFF’S 

PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS (ECF Nos. 625, 648) 

On January 16, 2024, Plaintiff Dassault Systemes, SA filed ten motions in 

limine in this action. (See Mot., ECF No. 625.) On March 5, 2024, Dassault filed a 

motion to strike certain evidence that Defendant Keith Childress sought to introduce 

at trial. (See Mot., ECF No. 648.) The Court believes that it has resolved all of 

Dassault’s motions in limine and Dassault’s motion to strike either in prior written 

rulings or on the record during trial. If and to the extent that any portions of these 

motions remain open (and the Court does not believe that any do), the Court 

TERMINATES those portions of the motion(s) as moot. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

       s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: May 22, 2024 

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 682, PageID.25605 Filed 05/22/24 Page 1 of 2
2 

 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on May 22, 2024, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5127 

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 682, PageID.25606 Filed 05/22/24 Page 2 of 2
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of World Series of Golf, Inc. for      the nine months ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the nine months ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of World Series of Golf,Inc. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Terry      Leiweke                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | R.      Terry Leiweke                                                           |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | November 13, 2008                                                     |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of 
Veterans Affairs, has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) the following proposal for the collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0242.
    Title and Form Number: Water-Plumbing Systems Inspection Report 
(Manufactured Home), VA Form 26-8731a.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Need and Uses: Inspections are ordered by lending institutions and 
performed by experienced plumbers or manufactured home service 
personnel. VA Form 26-8731a will be completed by the inspector after 
the tests described on the form have been made. The lender submits the 
report form to the applicable VA regional office with its report of 
loan closing. If the report is satisfactory, and the loan is otherwise 
proper, the regional office then issues a certificate of guaranty 
covering the loan. Without proof of satisfactory water and plumbing 
systems, VA would be guaranteeing loans on used manufactured homes 
which could be unsafe and which would not be acceptable security on 
which to base an increase in the government's contingent liability.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households and Business or other 
for-profit.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 800 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 2 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 400.

ADDRESSES: A copy of this submission may be obtained from Ron Taylor, 
VA Clearance Officer (045A4), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015.
    Comments and recommendations concerning the submission should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. DO NOT send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer by no later than August 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Taylor, VA Clearance Officer 
(045A4), (202) 273-8015.

    Dated: June 24, 1996.

    By direction of the Secretary.
William T. Morgan,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 96-16784 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit 32

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Piedmont Community Bank Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Drew Hulsey, Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, and I, Julie
Simmons, Chief Financial Officer of the Bank, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Drew HulseyDrew Hulsey, C.E.O. (Principal Executive
Officer)




/s/ Julie SimmonsJulie Simmons, C.F.O. (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)


May 14, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

 

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any otherpurpose.

 

The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certify as follows:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”),which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated  this 14th day of August, 2008. |                     |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                  |                     |
|                                  |                     |
|                                  | /s/  Robert S. Aisner    |
|                                  | Robert  S. Aisner        |
|                                  | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                  |                     |
|                                  |                     |
|                                  | /s/  Gary S. Bresky      |
|                                  | Gary  S. Bresky          |
|                                  | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will beretained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products,
Inc, (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yuehua
Xia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  August
      13, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Yuehua XiaYuehua
      XiaChief
      Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EDWARD THOMAS,

Petitioner,

v. Case Number: 08-cv-14273

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

CAROL HOWES,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER 

DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR APPEAL BOND

OR EXPEDITED JUDGMENT

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District

of Michigan, on February 22, 2010.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On October 7, 2008, Petitioner Edward Thomas (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner,

filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his

convictions in October 2006, following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Wayne

County, Michigan, for (1) kidnapping, (2) criminal sexual conduct, fourth degree, and (3)

domestic violence. Petitioner contends that there was insufficient evidence to find him

guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Respondent filed a response to the petition and Rule 5

materials on July 1 and 6, 2009, respectively. Presently before the Court is Petitioner’s

motion for bond or expedited judgment, filed January 27, 2010.
2

The standard for entitlement to bail pending a decision on the merits in a habeas

corpus proceeding is difficult to satisfy:

In order to receive bail pending a decision on the merits,

prisoners must be able to show not only a substantial claim of

law based on the facts surrounding the petition but also the

existence of “some circumstances making the motion for bail

exceptional and deserving of special treatment in the interests

of justice.”

Dotson v. Clark, 900 F.2d 77, 79 (6th Cir. 1990) (quoting Aronson v. May, 85 S. Ct. 3, 5

(1964)). The Dotson court indicated that “[t]here will be few occasions where a prisoner

will meet this standard.” Id. “Since a habeas petitioner is appealing a presumptively

valid state conviction, both principles of comity and common sense dictate that it will

indeed be the very unusual case where a habeas petitioner is admitted to bail prior to a

decision on the merits in the habeas case.” Lee v. Jabe, 989 F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir.

1993).

Petitioner has not met the standard for bond set forth in Dotson, particularly as his

only challenge to his conviction is an insufficiency of the evidence claim. Relief,

therefore, must await review of the state-court record.

Petitioner alternatively asks the Court to expedite its decision relative to his habeas

petition. Petitioner, however, fails to show good cause to expedite a ruling on his

petition. Petitioner has not demonstrated that reviewing this matter in the Court’s normal

course would be prejudicial to his interests or constitute undue delay.

Accordingly,
3

IT IS ORDERED, that Petitioner’s Motion for Appeal Bond or Expedited

Judgment is DENIED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Edward Thomas, #524590

Cooper Street Correctional Facility

3100 Cooper Street

Jackson, MI 49201

Laura Cook, Esq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,126
<SECURITIES>                                    21,777
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (529)
<INVENTORY>                                        270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,234
<PP&E>                                          13,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,745)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,869
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,873
<SALES>                                         59,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,407
<CGS>                                            8,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,035
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,578
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22


</TABLE>
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 94-50740

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK ZEDELL CLARK,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-94-CR-100

- - - - - - - - - -

March 6, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judes.

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Zedell Clark appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of with intent to

distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). He argues that the disparity between

the statutory penalties for offenses involving "crack" cocaine and offenses involving other types of

cocaine violates his equal protection and due process rights. Clark, however, waived the right to

appeal pursuant to a valid provision in his plea agreement. See United 

States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
H. R. 395

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be constructed

at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia Streets in Reno, Nevada,

as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse and Federal building to be constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia

Streets in Reno, Nevada, is designated as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson

United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map,

or other paper of the United States to the courthouse and Federal

building referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to

the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse and Federal

Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
•4

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20-0357

IN THE MATTER OF: A.W.and B.W.

Youths in Need ofCare. 

# FILED OCT 2 7 2020 Bowen (...3r eenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Counsel for the appellant father ofA.W. and B.W. filed a motion and briefasking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal,pursuant to §46-8-103(2),MCA, and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The father was granted time to file a response,but no response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA,and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the father's appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant father persot411y. DATED this Z-)

- ciay ofOctober,2020.
ChiefJustice 10/27/2020