Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 6607 

Eileen M. Albanese, 

Director for Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 08–480 Filed 2–4–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 520 

Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs; 

Spectinomycin 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is amending the 

animal drug regulations to correct an 

error in the indications for use for 

spectinomycin oral solution in swine. 

FDA is also amending the regulations 

for other oral dosage forms of 

spectinomycin to reflect a current 

format. These actions are being taken to 

improve the accuracy and readability of 

the animal drug regulations. 

DATES: This rule is effective February 5, 

2008. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George K. Haibel, Center for Veterinary 

Medicine (HFV–6), Food and Drug 

Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., 

Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9019, email: george.haibel@fda.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA has 

noticed that the animal drug regulations 

do not reflect the approved indications 

for use for spectinomycin oral solution 

in swine. At this time, FDA is amending 

the animal drug regulations in 

§ 520.2123c (21 CFR 520.2123c) to 

correct this error. FDA is also amending 

the regulations in § 520.2123a for 

spectinomycin tablets and in 

§ 520.2123b for spectinomycin powder 

to reflect a current format. These actions 

are being taken to improve the accuracy 

and readability of the animal drug 

regulations. 

This rule does not meet the definition 

of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because 

it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’

Therefore, it is not subject to the 

congressional review requirements in 5 

U.S.C. 801–808. 

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520 

Animal drugs. 

■ Therefore, under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under the 

authority delegated to the Commissioner 

of Food and Drugs and redelegated to 

the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 

CFR part 520 is amended as follows: 

PART 520—ORAL DOSAGE FORM 

NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 520 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. 

■ 2. Revise § 520.2123 to read as 

follows: 

§ 520.2123 Spectinomycin oral dosage 

forms. 

■ 3. Revise § 520.2123a to read as 

follows: 

§ 520.2123a Spectinomycin tablets. 

(a) Specifications. Each tablet 

contains spectinomycin 

dihydrochloride pentahydrate 

equivalent to 100 milligrams (mg) 

spectinomycin. 

(b) Sponsor. See No. 061623 in 

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter. 

(c) Conditions of use in dogs—(1) 

Amount. Administer orally to provide 

10 mg per pound (lb) of body weight 

twice daily. Dosage may be continued 

for 4 consecutive days. 

(2) Indications for use. For the 

treatment of infectious diarrhea and 

gastroenteritis caused by organisms 

susceptible to spectinomycin. 

(3) Limitations. Federal law restricts 

this drug to use by or on the order of 

a licensed veterinarian. 

■ 4. Revise § 520.2123b to read as 

follows: 

§ 520.2123b Spectinomycin powder. 

(a) Specifications. Each gram (g) of 

powder contains spectinomycin 

dihydrochloride pentahydrate 

equivalent to 0.5 g spectinomycin. 

(b) Sponsor. See No. 061623 in 

§ 510.600(c) of this chapter. 

(c) Related tolerances. See § 556.600 

of this chapter. 

(d) Conditions of use in chickens. It is 

administered in the drinking water of 

growing chickens as follows: 

(1) Indications for use and amounts—

(i) For increased rate of weight gain and 

improved feed efficiency in broiler 

chickens, administer 0.5 g per gallon of 

water as the only source of drinking 

water for the first 3 days of life and for 

1 day following each vaccination. 

(ii) As an aid in controlling infectious 

synovitis due to Mycoplasma synoviae 

in broiler chickens, administer 1 g per 

gallon of water as the only source of 

drinking water for the first 3 to 5 days 

of life. 

(iii) As an aid in the prevention or 

control of losses due to CRD associated 

with M. gallisepticum (PPLO) in 

growing chickens, administer 2 g per 

gallon of water as the only source of 

drinking water for the first 3 days of life 

and for 1 day following each 

vaccination. 

(2) Limitations. Do not administer to 

laying chickens. Do not administer 

within 5 days of slaughter. 

■ 5. Revise § 520.2123c to read as 

follows: 

§ 520.2123c Spectinomycin solution. 

(a) Specifications. Each milliliter of 

solution contains spectinomycin 

dihydrochloride pentahydrate 

equivalent to 50 milligrams (mg) 

spectinomycin. 

(b) Sponsors. See Nos. 000856, 

059130, and 061623 in § 510.600(c) of 

this chapter. 

(c) Related tolerances. See § 556.600 

of this chapter. 

(d) Conditions of use in swine—(1) 

Amount. Administer 5 mg per pound 

(lb) of body weight orally twice daily for 

3 to 5 days. 

(2) Indications for use. For the 

treatment and control of porcine enteric 

colibacillosis (scours) caused by E. coli 

susceptible to spectinomycin in pigs 

under 4 weeks of age. 

(3) Limitations. Do not administer to 

pigs over 15 lb body weight or over 4 

weeks of age. Do not administer within 

21 days of slaughter. 

Dated: January 24, 2008. 

Bernadette Dunham, 

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine. 

[FR Doc. E8–2065 Filed 2–4–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4160–01–S 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 110 

[Docket No. USCG–2007–0036, formerly 

CGD07–122] 

RIN 1625–AA01 

Anchorage Regulation; Port 

Everglades, FL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard amends the 

anchorage regulations for Port 

Everglades, Florida. The amendment 

modifies the current anchorage area by 

eliminating that portion of the 

anchorage closest to sensitive coral reef 

areas, expands that portion of the 

anchorage area that poses less risk to 

these areas, and limits the amount of 

time a vessel may remain in the 

anchorage area. These changes ensure 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
6608 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 

all vessels have fair access to the 

anchorage area, and provide a higher 

degree of vessel and environmental 

safety by reducing the possibility of 

vessels grounding in sensitive coral reef 

areas. 

DATES: This rule is effective March 6, 

2008. 

ADDRESSES: Comments and material 

received from the public, as well as 

documents indicated in this preamble as 

being available in the docket, are part of 

docket [USCG–2007–0036, formerly 

CGD07–122] and are available for 

inspection or copying at United States 

Coast Guard Sector Miami, 100 

MacArthur Causeway, Miami Beach, 

Florida between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

LTJG Chris Svencer, United States Coast 

Guard Sector Miami Waterways 

Management at 305–535–4550. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information 

On October 22, 2007, we published a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

entitled Anchorage Regulation; Port 

Everglades, FL in the Federal Register 

(72 FR 59491). We received 10 letters 

commenting on the proposed rule. No 

public meeting was requested, and none 

was held. 

Background and Purpose 

During the last ten (10) years, nine (9) 

known vessel groundings and six (6) 

known vessel anchor mishaps have 

occurred during attempted or actual use 

of the Port Everglades anchorage areas. 

Anchoring mishaps include both 

misplacement of the anchor itself and/ 

or laying of the anchor chain on the 

sensitive coral reefs. The east coast of 

Florida is susceptible to severe and 

erratic weather, and mariners who are 

not vigilant can find themselves in 

extreme situations. Adverse weather 

conditions, proximity to the reef, 

congestion in the anchorage, poor 

navigation and seamanship were 

contributing factors to the groundings 

and anchoring mishaps in the Port 

Everglades anchorage and surrounding 

vicinity. The current anchorage 

regulation is published in 33 CFR 

110.186. This rule is needed to 

strengthen existing anchoring 

requirements and guidelines in order to 

provide a higher degree of protection to 

the coastal area and sensitive benthic 

coral reef ecosystems, as well as to 

provide a safer anchorage for mariners. 

This rule re-designates the anchorage 

areas to account for anchor position and 

chain lay and limit the amount of time 

vessels may remain at anchorage. The 

Coast Guard has also researched 

alternative solutions for restructuring 

the anchorage. These alternatives have 

included: change nothing and continue 

to use the current anchorage; create 

anchorage circles to control the location 

of vessels in the anchorage; and remove 

the anchorage completely. The 

groundings and anchor mishaps have 

had a negative impact on the sensitive 

coral reefs and prompts the Coast Guard 

to alter the current anchorage area. 

Creating anchorage circles for precision 

anchorage does not eliminate the threat 

to the local reefs due to changing 

weather conditions that may cause 

vessels, even if properly anchored, to 

drag over the coral reefs to the west. 

Lastly, while removing the anchorage 

altogether would arguably be best for 

the environment, this option is not 

economically feasible due to the 

legitimate need for commercial vessels 

to anchor while awaiting berth in Port 

Everglades. 

Discussion of Comments and Changes 

On October 22, 2007 the Coast Guard 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) that proposed 

changing the location of the commercial 

anchorage located offshore from Port 

Everglades in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. 

Ten letters were received in response to 

the NPRM. All ten letters were in favor 

of moving the anchorage into deeper 

waters to protect the environment. 

Within the ten letters there were 

numerous different comments 

addressing the new location of the 

anchorage. 

Three comments addressed moving 

the anchorage either farther to the south 

or farther offshore from the Port 

Everglades main ship channel. Both of 

these options were extensively explored 

by the Harbor Safety Committee. Due to 

a restricted area designated by 33 CFR 

334.580, the area south of Port 

Everglades does not permit anchoring of 

vessels. This area is immediately south 

of the main ship channel entrance and 

continues south for approximately 4 

nautical miles. Moving the anchorage 

further offshore than proposed by this 

rule creates a potentially untenable and 

even dangerous situation for many 

commercial vessels awaiting berths in 

Port Everglades. The further the vessels 

are offshore the deeper the water they 

must anchor in. Beyond the reasonable 

depth that the revised anchorage 

proposes, many of the commercial 

vessels calling on Port Everglades will 

have insufficient anchor chain to 

properly scope to the standard 5 to 7 

times the water depth to provide 

sufficient holding, thus presenting a risk 

to the reefs, other vessels in the 

anchorage, and even the vessel 

deploying their anchor. 

Two comments addressed installing a 

mooring buoy system for vessels in the 

anchorage. The installation of mooring 

buoys is extremely costly and once 

installed require continual maintenance 

to be effective. One of the comments 

also addressed funding the buoys by 

taxing each vessel that uses the port. 

This option was reviewed and 

considered by the Harbor Safety 

Committee but was not a viable option. 

At this time the committee is unaware 

of any federal, state, or local government 

agency willing to authorize, fund, and 

maintain the mooring buoys. If at a later 

time a single or joint entity would fund 

this project, the Harbor Safety 

Committee would readdress this issue at 

that time. The solution to move the 

anchorage offshore to its new location is 

a step in the right direction to ensure 

the safety of our reefs and shores. 

Another comment addressed better 

educating mariners regarding the 

location of the sensitive reefs in the 

area. In cooperation with the anchorage 

relocation, the National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration has added 

‘‘Co’’, the charting designation for a 

coral bottom, on all charts that depict 

the area offshore of Fort Lauderdale. 

This in coordination with increased 

information in the Coast Pilot will assist 

mariners in understanding the location 

of reefs in the area. 

Regulatory Evaluation 

This rule is not a ‘‘significant 

regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

This rule may affect the following 

entities, some of which might be small 

entities: The owners or operators of 

vessels intending to utilize the 

anchorage area outside Port Everglades, 

Florida. This rule will not have a 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 6609 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities for 

the same reasons given above in the 

‘‘Regulatory Evaluation’’ section of this 

preamble. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. If 

you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule will have a significant 

impact on it, please submit a comment 

(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you 

think it qualifies and how and to what 

degree this rule would economically 

affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we offered to assist small entities in 

understanding the rule so that they 

could better evaluate its effects on them 

and participate in the rulemaking 

process. If this rule affects your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning compliance, please contact 

Lieutenant Junior Grade Chris Svencer, 

Coast Guard Sector Miami, Waterways 

Management Division at (305) 535–

4550. The Coast Guard will not retaliate 

against small entities that question or 

complain about this rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This rule calls for no new collection 

of information under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–

3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this rule under that Order and have 

determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 or more in any one year. 

Though this rule will not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not effect a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD 

which guides the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have concluded that there are no factors 

in this case that would limit the use of 

a categorical exclusion under section 

2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, this 

rule is categorically excluded, under 

figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(f), of the 

Instruction, from further environmental 

documentation. 

Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(f), of 

the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental 

Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical 

Exclusion Determination’’ are not 

required for this rule. Even though a 

categorical exclusion may be used the 

Coast Guard found good reason to 

further investigate the effects the 

anchorage area modification would have 

on the environment. A preliminary 

‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. Furthermore, as part 

of section 7 of the Endangered Species 

Act (50 CFR part 402, 16 U.S.C. 1536), 

the U.S. Coast Guard opened 

consultation with a number of 

stakeholders. The National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

the National Marine Fisheries Service 

(NMFS), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (FWS) have reviewed all 

restructuring plans and believe the 

proposed action would not likely affect 

the West Indian Manatee, Johnson’s 

Seagrass, Smalltooth Sawfish, and all 

local turtle species because the project 

does not have any elements with the 

potential to affect these listed species. 

NOAA also found that the restructuring 

into deeper waters, farther away from 

the easternmost reef, is likely to have an 

indirect beneficial effect on Elkhorn and 

Staghorn coral by potentially reducing 

vessel groundings and anchor damage 

that have adversely affected corals and 

other important near shore benthic 

resources in the project area. 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES
6610 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 24 / Tuesday, February 5, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110 

Anchorage grounds. 

Words of Issuance and Regulatory Text 

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 110 as follows: 

PART 110—ANCHORAGE 

REGULATIONS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 110 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 

1236, 2030, 2035, 2071,; 33 CFR 1.05–1; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Amend § 110.186 by revising 

paragraphs (a), (b)(3) through (6), and 

adding paragraphs (b)(7) through (9) to 

read as follows: 

§ 110.186 Port Everglades, Florida. 

(a) The anchorage grounds. The 

anchorage grounds, the center of which 

is located approximately two and one 

half miles northeast of the entrance to 

Port Everglades, is an area bounded by 

a line connecting points with the 

following North American Datum 83 

coordinates: 

Latitude Longitude 

26–08′26.934′′ N ....... 080–04′28.240′′ W 

26–08′08.560′′ N ....... 080–04′16.158′′ W 

26–07′56.000′′ N ....... 080–04′17.486′′ W 

26–07′56.000′′ N ....... 080–02′42.623′′ W 

26–07′19.500′′ N ....... 080–02′53.153′′ W 

26–07′19.500′′ N ....... 080–04′28.800′′ W 

26–06′35.160′′ N ....... 080–04′28.800′′ W 

26–06′35.160′′ N ....... 080–04′38.694′′ W 

26–08′26.934′′ N ....... 080–04′28.240′′ W 

(b) * * * 

(3) All vessels within the designated 

anchorage area shall maintain a 24-hour 

bridge watch by a licensed deck officer 

proficient in English, monitoring VHF–

FM channel 16. This individual shall 

confirm that the ship’s crew performs 

frequent checks of the vessel’s position 

to ensure the vessel is not dragging 

anchor. 

(4) Vessels may anchor anywhere 

within the designated anchorage area 

provided that: such anchoring does not 

interfere with the operations of any 

other vessels currently at anchorage; 

and all anchor and chain or cable is 

positioned in such a manner to preclude 

dragging over reefs. 

(5) No vessel may anchor in a ‘‘dead 

ship’’ status (i.e. propulsion or control 

unavailable for normal operations) 

without the prior approval of the 

Captain of the Port. Vessels 

experiencing casualties such as a main 

propulsion, main steering or anchoring 

equipment malfunction or which are 

planning to perform main propulsion 

engine repairs or maintenance, shall 

immediately notify the Coast Guard 

Captain of the Port via Coast Guard 

Sector Miami on VHF–FM Channel 16. 

(6) No vessel may anchor within the 

designated anchorage for more than 72 

hours without the prior approval of the 

Captain of the Port. To obtain this 

approval, contact the Coast Guard 

Captain of the Port, via the Port 

Everglades Harbor Master, on VHF–FM 

Channel 14. 

(7) The Coast Guard Captain of the 

Port may close the anchorage area and 

direct vessels to depart the anchorage 

during periods of adverse weather or at 

other times as deemed necessary in the 

interest of port safety or security. 

(8) Commercial vessels anchoring 

under emergency circumstances outside 

the anchorage area shall shift to new 

positions within the anchorage area 

immediately after the emergency ceases. 

(9) Whenever the maritime or 

commercial interests of the United 

States so require, the Captain of the 

Port, U.S. Coast Guard, Miami, Florida, 

may direct relocation of any vessel 

anchored within the anchorage area. 

Once directed, such vessel must get 

underway at once or signal for a tug, 

and must change position as directed. 

Dated: January 10, 2008. 

D.W. Kunkel, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Seventh Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. E8–1757 Filed 2–4–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2008–0013] 

RIN 1625–AA87 

Security Zone; MacDill Air Force Base, 

Tampa Bay, FL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Interim rule with request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a security zone that is 

concurrent with the Army Corps of 

Engineers restricted area adjacent to 

MacDill Air Force Base. The security 

zone is necessary to facilitate security 

operations conducted at the Air Force 

Base. All persons, vessels, or other craft 

are prohibited from anchoring, mooring, 

drifting, or transiting within this zone, 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port St. Petersburg or a designated 

representative. 

DATES: This interim rule is effective 

February 5, 2008. Comments and related 

material must reach the Docket 

Management Facility on or before April 

7, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by Coast Guard docket 

number USCG–2008–0013 to the Docket 

Management Facility at the U.S. 

Department of Transportation. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Online: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–

0001. 

(3) Hand delivery: Room W12–140 on 

the Ground Floor of the West Building, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The telephone 

number is 202–366–9329. 

(4) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call 

Waterways Management Division, 

Sector St. Petersburg, FL (813) 228–

2191, Ext 8307. If you have questions on 

viewing or submitting material to the 

docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation (DOT) 

to use the Docket Management Facility. 

Please see DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’

paragraph below. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2008–0013), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and give the reason for each 

comment. We recommend that you 

include your name and a mailing 

address, an e-mail address, or a phone 

number in the body of your document 

so that we can contact you if we have 


rmajette on PROD1PC64 with RULES