alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of XTOL Energy Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Dated: October 22, 2007 | /s/ Jordan Shapiro                                         
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Jordan Shapiro                                             
|                        | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting
      Officer

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

COREY FRAZIER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 09-11355

HONORABLE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

DEBRA SCUTT,

Respondent.

______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND THE HABEAS PETITION

Petitioner Corey Frazier has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition challenging his state

convictions for first-degree murder and two firearm offenses. He claims that: (1) the trial court

abused its discretion by refusing to grant a mistrial when the prosecutor elicited testimony that

Petitioner previously got away with murder and would kill for money; (2) he was denied his Sixth

Amendment right to confront his accusers by the admission of his co-defendant’s hearsay

statements; and (3) his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to object to the use of the codefendant’s hearsay statements. Respondent argues in an answer to the habeas petition that

Petitioner’s claims lack merit or are procedurally defaulted and that the claimed errors were

harmless or did not prejudice the defense. 

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s joint motion for an evidentiary hearing and to amend

the habeas petition. The motion [Dkt. #9] alleges that Petitioner’s case is similar to People v.

Shotwell, No. 92796 (Mich. Ct. App. Sept. 1, 1988), and that an evidentiary hearing is necessary to

correct the record and to develop the facts regarding Petitioner’s trial attorney. 
2

To the extent that Petitioner merely seeks to bring the Shotwell case to the Court’s attention,

his motion is GRANTED. The motion is DENIED without prejudice to the extent that it seeks an

evidentiary hearing, because the Court is not persuaded that Petitioner has alleged “sufficient

grounds for release.” Stanford v. Parker, 266 F.3d 442, 459 (6th Cir. 2001) (quoting Wilson v.

Kemna, 12 F.3d 145, 146 (8th Cir. 1994)). The Court will reconsider Petitioner’s motion, if

necessary, following a review of the state court record. It will not be necessary for Petitioner to

renew his motion.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 8, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the above date a copy of this Order was served upon the Petitioner

and Respondent via ordinary U.S. Mail and electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DELBERT L. HEYTHALER,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-cv-11502

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

v.

Michael Hluchaniuk

United States Magistrate Judge

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING THE CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk’s Report and Recommendation

Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment, Reversing the findings of the Commissioner and Remanding the matter for further

proceedings. (Dkt. No. 14.)

 Having reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections

from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment, DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, REVERSES the findings of the

Commissioner and REMANDS the matter for further proceedings. 
The matter is hereby remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with

the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 3, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

September 3, 2010.

s/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     annual  financial  statements of GS Financial  Products  U.S.,  L.P. and is
     qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial  statements
     contained in GS Financial  Products  U.S.,  L.P.'s Form 10-K for the fiscal
     year ended November 28, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000914720
<NAME>                        GS Financial Products U.S., L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-28-1997
<CASH>                                         291,375
<SECURITIES>                                   95,185
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,090
<BONDS>                                        276,489
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,683
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,823
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                   608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,228
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
Notes
-----------------
Balances relating to derivative transactions are not reflected in the above 
figures.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Wayne A. Doss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texas Sweet Crude Oil Corp for the 1st quarter ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Texas Sweet Crude Oil Corp.




Date:  June 28, 2010/s/ Wayne A DossWayne A DossPresident, C.E.O. and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4143 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4143

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to waive the English 
language and civics requirements for naturalization for persons who are 
 over 65 and have resided legally in the United States for at least 20 
                                 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 1996

  Mr. Blute introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to waive the English 
language and civics requirements for naturalization for persons who are 
 over 65 and have resided legally in the United States for at least 20 
                                 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND CIVICS REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 312(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1423(b)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) The requirements of subsection (a) shall not apply to 
        any person who, on the date of the filing of the person's 
        application for naturalization as provided in section 334 is 
        over sixty-five years of age and has been living in the United 
        States for periods totaling at least twenty years subsequent to 
        a lawful admission for permanent residence.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11338 and #11339]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Ohio dated 07/23/2008. *Incident:*
                         Apartment Building Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         07/05/2008.
 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/23/2008. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/22/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/23/2009.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Lucas. *Contiguous Counties:* Ohio: Fulton, Henry, Ottawa, Wood. Michigan: Lenawee, Monroe. Percent*The Interest Rates are:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.375Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.687Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11338 5 and for economic injury is 11339 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Ohio, Michigan. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) July 23, 2008. Jovita Carranza, Acting Administrator.


[FR Doc. E8-17771 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STANLEY PRICE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-13081

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

vs.

MICHIGAN STATE TREASURER,

 

Defendant.

______________________________/

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan’s Report and

Recommendation (“R and R”) dated June 17, 2010, recommending that the Court deny

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant filed an objection. 

This Court has had an opportunity to fully review this matter and the parties’ filings, and

believes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. 

Defendant’s objection to the R and R is inappropriate, as it raises new arguments which were not

before the Court in the underlying motion and, accordingly, were not addressed in the R and R. 

However, as the R and R expressly provides Plaintiff with an opportunity to file a more definite

statement, which Plaintiff has done, the Court will permit the parties to file dispositive motions

within 30 days of the date of this Order. 

ACCORDINGLY:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 17, 2010, is hereby accepted and adopted.
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may file dispositive motions within 30 days

of the date of this Order.

Dated: September 17, 2010 s/Bernard A. Friedman_______________

Detroit, Michigan BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document 

was served upon counsel of record by electronic and/or first-class mail.

S/Carol Mullins 

Case Manager to Judge Friedman
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4124

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the denial

of deduction for excessive employee compensation shall apply to all employees and to expand the types of compensation to which such denial

applies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 19, 1996

Mr. KLINK (for himself, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. BARRETT

of Wisconsin, Mr. OWENS, Mr. LAFALCE, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. DELLUMS,

and Mr. EVANS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that the denial of deduction for excessive employee compensation shall apply to all employees and to expand

the types of compensation to which such denial applies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR

4 EXCESSIVE EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION.

5 (a) DENIAL OF DEDUCTION TO APPLY TO ALL EM6 PLOYEES.—
2

•HR 4124 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (m) of section

2 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

3 to denial of deduction for certain excessive employee

4 compensation) is amended by striking ‘‘covered em5 ployee’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘em6 ployee.’’

7 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection

8 (m) of section 162 of such Code is amended by

9 striking paragraph (3) and redesignating paragraph

10 (4) as paragraph (3).

11 (b) REPEAL OF EXCEPTIONS FOR CERTAIN TYPES

12 OF COMPENSATION.—

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section

14 162(m) of such Code (as redesignated by subsection

15 (a)) is amended by striking subparagraphs (B) and

16 (C) and by redesignating subparagraphs (D), (E),

17 and (F) as subparagraphs (B), (C), and (D), respec18 tively.

19 (2) BINDING CONTRACTS.—Subparagraph (B)

20 of section 162(m)(3) (as so redesignated) is amend21 ed to read as follows:

22 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION FOR EXISTING BINDING

23 CONTRACTS.—
3

•HR 4124 IH

1 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘applica2 ble employee remuneration’ shall not in3 clude any remuneration—

4 ‘‘(I) which is payable under a

5 written binding contract which was in

6 effect on February 17, 1993, and

7 ‘‘(II) which was not modified

8 thereafter in any material respect be9 fore such remuneration is paid.

10 ‘‘(ii) SPECIAL RULE.—Clause (i)(I)

11 shall be applied by substituting ‘July 23,

12 1996’ for ‘February 17, 1993’ in the case

13 of—

14 ‘‘(I) an employee who would not

15 have been a covered employee as de16 fined in this subsection as in effect on

17 the day before the date of the enact18 ment of this sentence, and

19 ‘‘(II) remuneration which would

20 not have been applicable remuneration

21 by reason of subparagraph (B) or (C)

22 of paragraph (4) of this subsection as

23 so in effect.’’
4

•HR 4124 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

3 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4189

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage

of vancomycin home parenteral therapy under the Medicare program.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Mr. STARK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means,

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the

committee conerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for coverage of vancomycin home parenteral therapy

under the Medicare program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Vancomycin

5 Home Parenteral Therapy Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 4189 IH

1 SEC. 2. MEDICARE COVERAGE OF VANCOMYCIN HOME PAR2 ENTERAL THERAPY.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(n)’’ and inserting ‘‘(n)(1)’’;

6 (2) by inserting ‘‘vancomycin as described in

7 paragraph (2),’’ after ‘‘beds,’’; and

8 (3) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘(2) The vancomycin described in this paragraph is

10 the antimicrobial vancomycin which is administered to a

11 patient parenterally using an access device that is inserted

12 into the body, if the patient’s attending physician certifies

13 that such administration is for treatment of an infection

14 caused—

15 ‘‘(A) by beta-lactam-resistant gram-positive

16 microorganisms; or

17 ‘‘(B) by gram-positive microorganisms in the

18 case of a patient who has a severe allergy to beta19 lactam antimicrobials.’’.

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 subsection (a) apply with respect to vancomycin adminis22 tered on or after January 1, 1997.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 153 (Thursday, August 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 46002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18056]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RC08-4-002]


New Harquahala Generating Company, LLC; Notice of Filing

July 30, 2008.
    Take notice that on July 25, 2008, the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation (NERC) submitted for filing in compliance with 
Commission Order issued May 16, 2008, upheld the registration of New 
Harquahala Generating Company, LLC in the NERC Compliance Registry for 
the functions of transmission owner and transmission operator within 
the Western Electricity Coordinating Council.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecaaa9beafa38280858289bf999c9c839e98ac8a899e8fc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0e6e5f2e3efceccc9cec5f3d5d0d0cfd2d4e0c6c5d2c38ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 15, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18056 Filed 8-6-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>