alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35726-35727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 070196B]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Bluefish 
Monitoring Committee will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 18, 1996 beginning at 10:00 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Days Inn, 4101 Island 
Avenue, Philadelphia, PA; telephone: (215) 492-0400.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. 
New Street, Dover, DE 19901: telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Keifer, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: 302-674-2331.


[[Page 35727]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to make 
recommendations for the 1997 management measures (possession limit and 
quota) for bluefish.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Joanna Davis at the Council (see ADDRESSES) at 
least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: July 1, 1996.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-17274 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 91-11 Filed 03/14/11 Page 7 of 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TONY HADDAD,

Plaintiff, Case Number 09-12597

Honorable David M. Lawson

v. Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk

CHARLES RILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

CHARLES RILEY, BRIGHTON MARKET,

INC., and BLUE DIAMOND MARKET OF

WARREN, INC.,

Defendants,

and

BRIGHTON MARKET, INC.

Cross-Claimant,

v.

CHARLES RILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Cross-Defendant.

______________________________________/

JUDGMENT

On February 10, 2011, the Court entered an order adopting the report and recommendation

filed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk and granting the plaintiff’s motion for a default

judgment against defendant Blue Diamond Market, Inc. Subsequently, this matter came before the

Court on May 18, 2011 for a trial by the Court without a jury on the issue of damages against the

remaining defendants, Charles Riley & Associates, Inc. and Charles Riley, as well as Blue Diamond

Market, Inc. Counsel for these defendants did not appear for trial. Following the plaintiff’s proofs,

the Court made findings and conclusions on the record pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)(1). The

Case 2:09-cv-12597-DML-MJH ECF No. 72 filed 05/18/11 PageID.818 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Court granted judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $1,000.00 in statutory damages,

$10,000.00 in actual damages, $2,000.00 in punitive damages, and $2,230.98 in costs. The Court

also awarded the plaintiff attorney’s fees in an amount to be determined by the Court after the

submission of a supplemental affidavit by plaintiff’s counsel.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a default judgment is entered in favor

of the plaintiff and against defendant Blue Diamond Market, Inc., and a judgment after trial is

entered in favor of the plaintiff and against defendants Charles Riley and Charles Riley &

Associates, jointly and severally, in the amount of $15,230.98, plus applicable interest and attorney’s

fees.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 18, 2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 18, 2011.

s/Deborah R. Tofil 

DEBORAH R. TOFIL

Case 2:09-cv-12597-DML-MJH ECF No. 72 filed 05/18/11 PageID.819 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of TIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P. (the Fund) do hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Fund.

|                         |  |                                                                                                       
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Scott C. Evans                                                                                    
|                         |  | Scott C. EvansPrincipal Executive OfficerTIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P.                      
|                         |  |                                                                                                       
|Dated: November 13, 2008 |  | /s/ Phillip S. Nickolenko                                                                             
|                         |  | Phillip S. NickolenkoPrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerTIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P. and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael O. Matthews, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael O. Matthews                                                                
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Michael O. Matthews                                                                    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting and Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 14.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration StatementNos. 333-129945, 333-121164, 333-88854, 333-100522,333-51446, 333-09368, and 333-1796 on Form F-4, S-8, F-3, S-8, S-8, S-8, andS-8, respectively, and in Post-Effective Amendment No.7 to RegistrationStatement No. 333-117110 on Form F-3, and in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 onForm S-8 to Form F-4 to Registration Statement No. 333-15409, of KerznerInternational Limited and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our report datedMarch 21, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of theCompany, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for theyear ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Miami, Florida                |
| March 31, 2006                |

 

----
V . s W>-d>( RECEIVED IN 

## j£iiX^H-rD-erofee-R-^^aJ5 CflURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS —OCT 00 2015 Jb0ktt^axLLuM-\tf-4 U J<?$^\^- 

### ^D-^yj&zd&^^tf^^^sxtt^ : ^®IAcosfa,C8erk 

### .<fer-^VWl-l :S^uJLmi^_c^s^^^3^

X^A/:i-^W^ : ^_l^as_^cC^c^T^-oiU^

5^5. 

## l^Li^cij^Saa^
#### J. D. HOWTH, Appellant, v. T. J. FARRAR et al., Appellee.

No. 8545.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 25, 1938.

For former opinion, see 94 F.2d 654,

Before HUTCHESON and HOLMES, Circuit Judges, and STRUM, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

As neither of the judges who concurred in the judgment of the court in the above numbered and entitled cause is of the opinion that the petition for rehearing should be granted, it is ordered that the said petition be, and the same hereby is, denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3523

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

 v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Leon Nash, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 17, 2011

Filed: October 24, 2011

___________

Before RILEY, Chief Judge, LOKEN and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leon Nash appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to compel the

1

government to seek a downward sentencing departure, supplemental motion to

compel, and motion for discovery. We affirm.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b)(1) allows a court, upon the

government’s timely motion, to reduce a sentence when the defendant provides

information that substantially assists the government in investigating or prosecuting

The Honorable BillyRoy Wilson, United States DistrictJudge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas.
another person. Nash pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to conspiracy to

distribute fifty grams or more of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§

841(b)(1)(A)(iii) and 846, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. In Nash’s plea

agreement, the government agreed to move for a downward departure in exchange for

Nash cooperating in a case against Andre Sain and potentially others. The government

did not move for a downward departure. Nash argues the government acted arbitrarily

and hastily because he fulfilled his obligations under the plea agreement by providing

useful information regarding Sain.

The district court denied Nash’s motions, finding Nash failed to make a

substantial showing that the government was motivated by an improper purpose. It

found the government provided an acceptable reason, namely, the plea agreement

cooperation was not limited to Sain, and Nash failed to cooperate fully when he

provided information about a man named Carl Rossthat conflicted with Nash’s grand

jury testimony.

After reviewing the district court’s decision for abuse of discretion, see United

States v. Davis, 583 F.3d 1081, 1098 (8th Cir. 2009), we conclude the district court

applied the proper legal standard and did not clearly err in determining Nash failed to

make a substantial threshold showing of either an unconstitutional motive by the

government or no legitimate governmental reason for its decision. See Cooter & Gell

v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 (1990) (stating a district court abuses its

discretion by basing its holding on “an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly

erroneous assessment of the evidence”); see also Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181,

185-86 (1992) (explaining a district court may only compel the government to file a

motion for a downward departure or allow discovery concerning the government’s

failure to do so if the defendant makes a substantial threshold showing “that the

refusal was based on an unconstitutional motive” or “not rationally related to a

legitimate” governmental purpose (footnote omitted)). The district court did not abuse

its discretion, and we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2009, and for the period then ended.

|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT                   
|Glade M. KnightChief Executive Officer
|
|                                      
|August 7, 2009                        
|                                      
|/s/ BRYAN PEERY                       
|Bryan PeeryChief Financial Officer    
|
|                                      
|August 7, 2009                        

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DENNIS KING,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. BELL, 

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-10001

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For

the reasons set forth in an opinion issued this date,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion for

Summary Judgment is granted and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date:December 7, 2009

copies to:

Dennis King 

#364418 

Alger Maximum Correctional Facility 

P.O. Box 600 

Munsing, MI 49862 

Allan J. Soros, Esq.

2:09-cv-10001-PJD-MJH Doc # 24 Filed 12/07/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 99
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Across America Financial Services,
      Inc.
      (the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Brian L. Klemsz, Chief
      Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,


that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Date:  November
        8, 2007
 /s/
        Brian L. Klemsz
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
#### Patrick M. DUNCAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63523.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 16, 1993.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

*955Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find no error and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).

We also find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and affirm with written order. Rule 84.16(b). We have provided the parties with a memorandum for their use only.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

I, Paul R. Arena, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2019 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

*/s/ Paul R. Arena*

Paul R. Arena

President and CEO

 

October 22, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 09-10650 

Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

RICKEY VALENTINE, 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 Plaintiff, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, having filed its written Motion for 

Summary Judgment pursuant to FRCP 56; the Court having reviewed said Motion and 

being fully advised in the premises; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Judgment against Defendant, RICKEY 

VALENTINE in the amount of $1,452.61, plus pre-judgment interest in the amount of 

$1,282.82 as of June 3, 2009 and $350.00 in court costs for a total judgment amount of 

$3,085.43 together with post judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961 is awarded 

in favor of Plaintiff, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: June 3, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

on June 3, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

2:09-cv-10650-PJD-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 06/03/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 35
March 3, 2000



Board of Directors
TRISM, Inc.
4174 Jiles Road
Kennesaw, GA 30144

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 and issued our report thereon dated March 3, 2000. Note 1 to the financial statements describes a change in
accounting principle from accounting for tires in service as a prepaid expense to capitalizing tires acquired with owned equipment and expensing replacement tires at the time of purchase. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable
method of accounting over another for tires in service has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting principle is
preferable. Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to
the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20.

Very truly yours,



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
EXHIBIT 23.1
------------






                              CONSENT OF KPMG LLP





The Board of Trustees
AMLI Residential Properties Trust:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-65503 and 33-57327) on Form S-3 of AMLI Residential Properties
Trust of our report dated February 24, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of AMLI Residential Properties Trust as of December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, and the related schedule, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of AMLI
Residential Properties Trust.








                              KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
March 16, 2001