alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Scientific
Asset Holding, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dr. Leo H. Lin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 13, 2008


/s/ Dr. Leo H. Lin
--------------------------------
Dr. Leo H. Lin
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer


21
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3910

AN ACT

To provide emergency drought relief to the city of

purposes.Municipal Water Authority, Texas, and for otherCorpus Christi, Texas, and the Canadian River
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3910

AN ACT

To provide emergency drought relief to the city of Corpus

Christi, Texas, and the Canadian River Municipal Water

Authority, Texas, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3910 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Drought

3 Relief Act of 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF.

5 (a) CORPUS CHRISTI.—

6 (1) EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF.—For the

7 purpose of providing emergency drought relief, the

8 Secretary of the Interior shall defer all principal and

9 interest payments without penalty or accrued inter10 est for the 5-year period beginning on the date of

11 enactment of this Act for the city of Corpus Christi,

12 Texas, and the Nueces River Authority under con13 tract No. 6–07–01–X0675 involving the Nueces

14 River Reclamation Project, Texas: Provided, That

15 the city of Corpus Christi shall commit to use the

16 funds thus made available exclusively for the acquisi17 tion of or construction of facilities related to alter18 native sources of water supply.

19 (2) ISSUANCE OF PERMITS.—If construction of

20 facilities related to alternative water supplies re21 ferred to in paragraph (1) requires a Federal permit

22 for use of Bureau of Reclamation lands or facilities,

23 the Secretary shall issue such permits within 90

24 days after the date of enactment of this Act, rec25 ognizing the environmental impact statement

26 FES74–54 and the environmental assessment dated
3

•HR 3910 EH

1 March 1991 (relating to the Lavaca-Navidad River

2 Authority Pipeline permit).

3 (b) CANADIAN RIVER MUNICIPAL WATER AUTHOR4 ITY.—

5 (1) RECOGNITION OF TRANSFER OF LANDS TO

6 THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.—All obligations and

7 associated debt under contract No. 14–06–500–485

8 for land and related relocations transferred to the

9 National Park Service to form the Lake Meredith

10 National Recreation Area under Public Law 101–

11 628, in the amount of $4,000,000, shall be non12 reimbursable. The Secretary shall recalculate the re13 payment schedule of the Canadian River Municipal

14 Water Authority to reflect the determination of the

15 preceding sentence and to implement the revised re16 payment schedule within one year of the date of en17 actment of this Act.

18 (2) EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF.—The Sec19 retary shall defer all principal and interest payments

20 without penalty or accrued interest for the 3-year

21 period beginning on the date of enactment of this

22 Act for the Canadian River Municipal Water Au23 thority under contract No. 14–06–500–485 as emer-
4

•HR 3910 EH

1 gency drought relief to enable construction of addi2 tional water supply and conveyance facilities.

Passed the House of Representatives September 10,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Royal Blue Exploration, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: February 11, 2008


/s/ Larry Sostad
-----------------------------------------
Larry Sostad, Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2109

SHIRLEY A. HIRSHAUER; JAMES A. GERBEN, JR.; RANDY W. 

GERBEN; JASON W. GERBEN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

THOMAS G. ROSS, Judge; BROOKE SCHUMM, III; THE ESTATE OF

GERALDINE GRAY; TERRY BRUMWELL; ALICE HALL; ELIZABETH 

O’SHEA; HONORABLE THOMAS G. ROSS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-00832-CCB)

Submitted: January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shirley A. Hirshauer; James A. Gerben, Jr.; Randy W. Gerben; 

Jason W. Gerben, Appellants Pro Se. Alexis Burrell Rohde, 

Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephan Young 

Brennan, ILIFF, MEREDITH, WILDBERGER & BRENNAN, P.C., Pasadena, 

Maryland; Brooke Schumm, III, DANEKER, MCINTIRE, SCHUMM, PRINCE, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shirley A. Hirshauer, James A. Gerben, Jr., Randy W. 

Gerben, and Jason W. Gerben appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hirshauer v. Ross, No. 1:15-cv-00832-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 

26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report
of Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2008, Dennis P. Gauger hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.
            The
      annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.








March 31,
      2008
            /s/ Dennis P. Gauger(Date)
            Dennis
      P. GaugerChief
      Financial Officer
---

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Richard W. Donaldson, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of Pengram Corporation (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2010, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

| | By:    |                                
| | ------ | -------------------------------
| |        | /s/
      Richard W. Donaldson 
| | Name:  | RICHARD W. DONALDSON           
| |        |                                
| | Title: | Principal Executive Officer and
| |        | Principal Financial Officer    
| |        |                                
| | Date:  | July
      20, 2010            

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 15, 2017. 

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-928

Lower Tribunal No. 15-24559

________________

Eagle Arts Academy, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Tri-City Electric Co., Inc.,

Appellee.

An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.

Weiss, Handler & Cornwell, P.A. and William J. Cornwell and Seth A.

Kolton (Boca Raton), for appellant. 

Elder & Lewis, P.A. and Kerry H. Lewis and David B. Williams, for

appellee. 

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and SALTER, JJ. 

SUAREZ, C.J.
Eagle Arts Academy [“EAA”] appeals from a non-final order summarily

denying its motion to dismiss the complaint against it by Tri-County Electric

Company, Inc. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

Although Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(xi) 1

authorizes appeals of non-final orders that determine, as a matter of law, that a

party is not entitled to sovereign immunity, the order on appeal makes no explicit

or implicit finding as a matter of law that EAA is not entitled to sovereign

immunity. Compare Hastings v. Demming, 694 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 1997) (holding

that a final order denying summary judgment on a claim of workers’ compensation

immunity is not appealable unless the trial court order specifically states that, as a

matter of law, such a defense is not available to a party); Taival v. Barrett, 2016

WL 3866113 (Fla. 5th DCA July 2015) (“[A]n order that simply denies the

defendant’s motion [for summary judgment], but does not determine as a matter of

law that summary judgment is improper, is not appealable.”). The order

summarily denying the motion to dismiss and requiring the defendant EAA to

answer is simply and correctly the trial court’s determination that based on the four

corners of the Complaint the matter may move forward on the allegations. See

Lewis v. Barnett Bank of S. Fla., N.A., 604 So. 2d 937, 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)

(holding that on a motion to dismiss, the trial court is necessarily confined to the

well-pled facts alleged in the four corners of the complaint is not authorized to

1

In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, 151 So. 3d 1217

(Fla. 2014).

2
consider any other facts); Barbado v. Green & Murphy, P.A., 758 So. 2d 1173,

1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding a motion to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency

of the complaint and a court may not go beyond the four corners of the complaint

in considering the legal sufficiency of the allegations). 

Dismissed.

3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    GREGORY S. WEISHAR           
|Gregory S. Weishar                  
|Chief Executive Officer and Director
|November 4, 2010
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10192

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMONA JOHNSTON MANTHEI,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

UDC No. 97-CV-858-E

- - - - - - - - - -

October 30, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

On November 15, 1989, Ramona Johnston Manthei (Manthei),

federal prisoner #18595-077, pleaded guilty to distribution of

amphetamine. On October 9, 1997 she filed a habeas petition

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Government filed a motion to

dismiss, contending that the petition was time-barred by the 1996

Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) of 1996

(codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2255). The AEDPA sets a one-year statute

of limitations for federal habeas petitions. 
The district court granted the Government’s motion to dismiss.

Manthei then filed a certificate of appealability, which the

district court granted with respect to the application of the AEDPA

statute of limitations to Manthei’s § 2255 petition. On appeal

Manthei argues that the AEDPA was not enacted until after her

conviction and sentence, and its limitation provision should not be

retroactively applied. In the alternative she requests equitable

tolling of the statute of limitations. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and

conclude that the district court was correct in dismissing

Manthei’s petition because it was time-barred under the AEDPA. See

United States v. Flores, 135 F.3d 1000, 1005 (5th Cir. 1998).

Moreover, even assuming arguendo that equitable tolling does apply

to the statute of limitations for § 2255 motions, Manthei’s reasons

for delay do not rise to a level warranting equitable tolling. 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3680 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3680

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to carry out the international 
   obligations of the United States under the Geneva Conventions to 
           provide criminal penalties for certain war crimes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3680

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to carry out the international 
   obligations of the United States under the Geneva Conventions to 
           provide criminal penalties for certain war crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``War Crimes Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN WAR CRIMES.

    (a) In General.--Title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after chapter 117 the following:

                       ``CHAPTER 118--WAR CRIMES

``Sec.
``2401. War crimes.
``Sec. 2401. War crimes
    ``(a) Offense.--Whoever, whether inside or outside the United 
States, commits a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions, in any of the 
circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this 
title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if 
death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of 
death.
    ``(b) Circumstances.--The circumstances referred to in subsection 
(a) are that the person committing such breach or the victim of such 
breach is a member of the armed forces of the United States or a 
national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act).
    ``(c) Definitions.--As used in this section, the term `grave breach 
of the Geneva Conventions' means conduct defined as a grave breach in 
any of the international conventions relating to the laws of warfare 
signed at Geneva 12 August 1949 or any protocol to any such convention, 
to which the United States is a party.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of chapters for part I of title 
18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to chapter 117 the following new item:

``118. War crimes...........................................    2401''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Farrell G. JONES, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James L. SPARKMAN and General Motors Corporation, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 67178.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

April 2, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 6,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied June 25,1996.

Ernest L. Keathley, Jr., Florissant, for appellants.

Samel T. Vandover, St. Louis, for Spark-man.

Peter B. Hoffman, St. Louis, for General Motors.

Rodney E. Loomer, Wallace S. Squibb, Springfield, for General Motors.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and DOWD and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Farrell G. Jones (Jones) appeals the directed verdict entered in favor of defendant General Motors Corporation and also appeals the judgment entered upon the jury verdict in favor of defendant James L. Sparkman. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products,
      Inc, (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yuehua
      Xia ,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
                November 10, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Yuehua
              XiaYuehua
                XiaChief
                Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tag Events Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  March 30, 2007


/s/ Artiom Balykin
-------------------------------------------
Artiom Balykin, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)