alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on June 27, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc., has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Integrated Media Technologies, North Hollywood, CA; and Nielsen, Westport, CT, have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Convergent Media Labs, Marina del Rey, CA has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                 

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc., intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. 

                    On March 28, 2000, Advanced Media Workflow Association, Inc., filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 29, 2000 (65 FR 40127).                 

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 21, 2008. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 23, 2008 (73 FR 21984).                 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. 

[FR Doc. E8–17507 Filed 7–30–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                      CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT

         The undersigned certifies that he is a Senior Vice President of The CIT
Group/Sales Financing, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware
("CITSF"), and that as such he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this
certificate on behalf of CITSF in connection with Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1997 (the "Agreement"), among
CITSF, as Servicer, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, as Sellers, and Wilmington Trust Company acts as Owner Trustee
(all capitalized terms used herein without definition having the respective
meanings specified in the Agreement). The undersigned further certifies that a
review of the activities of CITSF during the preceding calendar year and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under his supervision and to the
best of his knowledge, based on such review, CITSF has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature this 1st day of
March, 2002.


                                       THE CIT GROUP/SALES
                                       FINNANCING, INC., as Servicer



                                       /s/ Gilmar Rodrigues
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Name:  Gilmar Rodrigues
                                       Title: Vice President
Motion Granted; Vacated and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed 

August 13, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00623-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

CBS OUTDOOR INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1016954

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 10, 2014. On July 15, 2015,

appellant The State of Texas and appellee Outfront Media LLC (formerly CBS 

Outdoor, Inc.) (“Outfront”) filed a motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment 

with respect to Outfront without regard to the merits and remand the case with 

respect to Outfront for entry of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the 

parties. 
2

On August 6, 2015, we ordered that portion of the appeal filed by The State 

of Texas with respect to Outfront SEVERED and filed under this appellate case 

number. We now grant the joint motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. 

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment signed March 10, 2014, with respect to 

Outfront and we remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in 

accordance with the parties’ agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown and Wise.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Trustees of the

OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 HEALTH CARE PLAN, et al

Plaintiffs, Case No. 09-10768

Honorable JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

v. 

BIG FOOT CONSTRUCTION LLC, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________/ 

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on April 21, 2009. This Court thereafter

ordered the defendant to obtain counsel and file a response to plaintiffs' motion by June 30, 2009

under threat of default. Defendant has failed to comply with this Court's order. Additionally,

pursuant to E.D.Mich.L.R.7.1(b), the defendant was required to file a written response to plaintiff'

motion if it opposed that motion. Defendant has failed to comply with that requirement, and

plaintiffs' motion is therefore unopposed. 

WHEREFORE, the relief requested in plaintiffs' summary judgment is hereby awarded by

default. This Court finds that defendant is bound by the collective bargaining agreements to remit

fringe benefit contributions on a monthly basis, and that it breached those agreements by failing to

remit those contributions. Plaintiffs audit determined that defendant owes $10,107.25 in unpaid

contributions and $1,005.07 in contractual and statutory liquidated damages in the period between

January 2008 and December 2008, which this Court finds that plaintiffs are entitled to under contract

and federal law. In addition, plaintiffs have submitted an affidavit of costs and attorney's fees

5:09-cv-10768-JCO-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 07/23/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 63
2

totaling $1,438.00, which this Court finds is a reasonable amount and to which plaintiffs are entitled

under federal law and equity. 

Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby awarded $12,550.32, and they shall execution thereof from

the defendant. 

s/John Corbett O’Meara

United States District Judge

Date: July 23, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record

on this date, July 23, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager

5:09-cv-10768-JCO-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 07/23/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 64
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**CHINA GREEN CREATIVE, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Deng Lin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that: 

 
|  

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

      */s/ Deng Lin*          

**Deng Lin**

**Chief Financial Officer**

**May 23, 2011**

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### SUBMARINE PIPELINE SPOILERS (U.S.A.), INC. and Jacob Simon Pieter de Vries, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SHELL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-1093, 03-1107.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 11, 2003.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

*This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:*

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3949 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3949

 For the relief of Senior Master Sergeant William L. Sullivan, United 
                           States Air Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 1, 1996

   Mr. Pete Geren of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 For the relief of Senior Master Sergeant William L. Sullivan, United 
                           States Air Force.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATION.

    During the 6-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the time limitation set forth in subsection (g) of section 
3721 (relating to claims of agency personnel for personal property 
damage or loss) of title 31, United States Code, shall not apply to a 
claim filed pursuant to such section by Senior Master Sergeant William 
L. Sullivan, United States Air Force, of Fort Worth, Texas, with 
respect to the loss of his household goods, which were stolen on March 
12, 1993, during the transportation of such goods from England to the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Paulson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
 
 /s/ Thomas J. PaulsonThomas J. PaulsonChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PT PUKUAFU INDAH, PT LEBONG

TANDAI, PT TANJUNG SERA PUNG,

GIDEON MINERALS U.S.A., INC.,

and DR. LEONARD L.J. YOUNG,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 09-10943

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

UNITED STATES SECURITIES &

EXCHANGE COMMISSION, MARY

J. SCHAPIRO, THE EXPORT IMPORT

BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, FRED P.

HOCHBERG, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.,

NEWMONT MINING CORP., GOLDMAN 

SACHS GROUP, INC., 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLC,

JAMES NELSON LANE, DEVONWOOD

CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, and

NEW CANAAN SOCIETY,

Defendants.

____________________________/

JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs initiated this action against Defendants on March 13, 2009. On May 1,

2009, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint and, on May 12, 2009, they filed a second

amended complaint. Defendant Newmont Mining Corporation then filed a motion to

dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, which this Court granted in an opinion and order

entered July 15, 2009. The remaining Defendants subsequently filed motions to dismiss

Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, which this Court granted in an opinion and order

entered on this date. The Court also denied Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a third

2:09-cv-10943-PJD-VMM Doc # 101 Filed 10/06/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2491
2

amended complaint on this date.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Plaintiffs’ second

amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that

JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs.

DATE:October 6, 2009 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record

2:09-cv-10943-PJD-VMM Doc # 101 Filed 10/06/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2492
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ramin
(“Ron”) Najafi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
12, 2010


/s/
      Ramin ("Ron") NajafiRamin
      (“Ron”) NajafiChief
      Executive Officer
Order entered November 4 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01398

- CR

No. 05

- 12

- 01687

- CR

DARIUS EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 51415



### O RDER

The Court DENIES as moot appellant’s October 31, 2013 motion to extend time to file

his briefs. On the Court’s own motion, we ordered the briefs filed on November 1, 2013.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.5


 





		 
    Core.Mark


 


Core-Mark International, I nc.!ff - Corona Division

353 Meyer Circle, Corona, CA 92879


April 17,2012


Michael R Dunn


Chairman and CEO


F.I.T.T. Energy Productsinc.


26381 Crown Valley Parkway, Suite 230


Mission Viejo, CA 92690


Dear Michael,


This letter is to confirm that Core-Mark International
Inc. has teamed up with F.I.T.T. Energy Product Inc. to distribute their energy products as well as the ED products. This new innovation
in the energy product category gives us a great opportunity to distribute and introduce this new product to our customer base.


The plan is to launch the F.I.T.T. Energy products in California,
Nevada and Arizona starting immediately and move on cross-country to the other divisions. We are looking for a long-term partnership
with F.I.T.T. Energy hoping that the F.I.T.T. products speak for themselves and become very profitable to both of our companies.


 


 


/s/ Carl Parker                          


Carl Parker


President


Core-Mark International, Inc.


Corona Division


Cc: Charles Khalil 

GRIPS Marketing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

LUEGENE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-11302

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

MIKE THOMAS, Saginaw County Prosecutor,

and KACZMAREK, Judge,

Defendants.

______________________________________ /

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT SUA SPONTE

On April 22, 2009, Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a report and recommendation

that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint sua sponte. None of the parties to this action filed

objections to the report and recommendation. A party’s failure to file objections to the report and

recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local

231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge’s

report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.

140, 149 (1985). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt.

# 5] is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 18, 2009

1:09-cv-11302-TLL-CEB Doc # 6 Filed 05/18/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 18
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 18, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:09-cv-11302-TLL-CEB Doc # 6 Filed 05/18/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 19
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-122126; Form S-3 No. 333-119016; and Form S-3 No. 333-128893) of Jameson Inns, Inc. of our reports dated March 1, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and scheduleof Jameson Inns, Inc., Jameson Inns Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Jameson Inns, Inc., included in this Form10-K/A. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

May 1, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHERROD F. MILLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAMES MARTIN,

Defendant.

 /

Case Number: 09-10983

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Before the Court is Plaintiff Sherrod Miller’s Application to Proceed In Forma

Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). The Court, having reviewed Miller’s

Application, finds that he has established indigence. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Miller’s

Application.

Although Miller establishes indigence, the screening mandated by Congress in

§ 1915(e)(2) obligates the Court to dismiss the Complaint if it “fails to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2),

Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been

paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that:

. . .

2:09-cv-10983-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 04/09/09 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 13
2

(B) the action or appeal: 

 

(i) is frivolous or malicious; 

(ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or 

(iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune

from such relief. 

The Court is mindful that a pro se litigant’s complaint is to be construed liberally,

Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 110 (6th Cir. 1991), and is held to “less stringent standards”

than a complaint drafted by counsel, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

Nonetheless, such complaints still must plead facts showing that a redressable legal wrong

has been committed. FED.R.CIV.P. 8(a)(2); Dekoven v. Bell, 140 F.Supp.2d 748, 755 (E.D.

Mich. 2001).

Even with a liberal reading of Miller’s Complaint, the Court cannot discern facts

sufficient to support a viable claim against Martin. Although Miller’s Complaint names

Martin as the defendant, it does not allege that Martin committed any specific acts of

wrongdoing. Miller merely claims that Martin somehow caused him to be deprived of social

security benefits. The Complaint lacks any allegations regarding the timing or nature of any

conduct by Martin that violates the law. In sum, the Complaint falls far short of meeting the

notice pleading standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, because it is entirely

conclusory and does not indicate what acts Martin is alleged to have committed that could

result in liability. 

 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint, (doc. 1), is DISMISSED without prejudice for

failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 

2:09-cv-10983-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 04/09/09 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 14
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: April 9, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 Copies of this Order were mailed to Plaintiff of record on this date by ordinary mail. 

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10983-MOB-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 04/09/09 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 15
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Glance, Inc. (the "Company") on  Form
10-QSB for the  period  ended March 31, 2008, as filed with  the Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned, in  the
capacities and on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.


Date:  May 8, 2008


/s/ Alla Karmazina
----------------------------------
Alla Karmazina
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
Treasurer, principal accounting
officer and Director