alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ravinder Minhas, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10 QSB of  Minhas  Energy
     Consultants, Inc.:

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6.   I have  indicated  in this  report  whether or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 1, 2007


By: /s/ Ravinder Minhas
   -------------------------------
   Ravinder Minhas
   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the periodic report of uKarma Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bill Glaser, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:  August
      12, 2010
              /s/ Bill GlaserBill
      GlaserChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)and
      Interim Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial
      and Accounting Officer)
Order entered September 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00627-CR

DEON REESE EVANS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1228191-U

ORDER

The Court has before it appellee The State of Texas’s September 12, 2014 second motion 

for extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and DIRECT the Clerk to file the 

brief appellee contemporaneously tendered with its motion as of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1118-DR]


North Dakota; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of North Dakota (FEMA-1118-DR), dated June 5, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective June 21, 1996.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
 William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-17291 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

Open Meeting, Technical Mapping Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 1, the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
gives notice that the following meeting will be held:

    Name: Technical Mapping Advisory Council.
    Date of Meeting: July 15, 1996.
    Place: The meeting will be held via TeleVideoconference from 7 
sites across the United States.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Proposed Agenda: Discussion of goals to be pursued by the 
Council in the upcoming year; assign action items for the September 
meeting.
    Status: This meeting is open to the public. However, in order to 
participate you must submit a request in writing. Fax the written 
request to Mike Buckley at (202) 646-4596 by July 9, 1996. Be sure 
to include your name and a daytime telephone number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael K. Buckley, P.E., Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., room 421, Washington, DC 
20472; telephone (202) 646-2756 or by fax as noted above.

    Dated: June 25, 1996.
Richard W. Krimm,
Acting Associate Director, Mitigation Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-16703 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-04-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. David Alleman and Alleman Consulting, 

LLC

Appellate case number: 01-19-00049-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-66742

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

On July 9, 2019, this Court abated this appeal pending the trial court’s resolution of a 

related matter. Since then, appellees have filed several status report in this Court, the most 

recent on September 16, 2020. That status report indicated mediation is scheduled for September 

25, 2020, and that trial is scheduled on the two-week docket beginning October 5, 2020.

Appellees are hereby ordered to file a fifth status report within thirty days from the date 

of this order. The status report should advise this Court of the status of any related trial court 

proceedings.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _________/s/ Julie Countiss______________________

Acting individually

Date: September 29, 2020
To the extent the Company is funded through additional issuances of equity, the Executiveshall be given an opportunity to purchase additional equity in an amount necessary to preserve theExecutive’s 3.5% percent of ownership. The price for such additional Equity shall be the purchaseprice paid for the additional equity issuance that gave rise to the additional Equity purchaseopportunity.The Company will provide Executive at least ten business days notice prior to any cashdistributions resulting from financing or sale transactions (as opposed to from operations) to theInvestors such that Executive shall have an opportunity to purchase Equity prior thereto andthereby be entitled to share in any such distribution. This notice obligation shall cease onceExecutive has purchased all of the Equity.2. Purchase Loan. The Lightstone Group LLC or an affiliate thereof (“Lightstone”)will make a loan (“Loan”) available to the Executive for his purchase of the Equity. The principaland interest on the loan will be subject to a ten-year balloon repayment with interest accruingannually at 7%; provided that Executive shall be required to apply the net after-tax cash proceedsof any distributions from the Company towards payment of the Loan. The Loan shall be secured bythe Equity and non-recourse to the Executive.The Loan may be prepaid without penalty. The Loan will accelerate and become due to theextent of any transfer or sale of Equity by Executive other than as permitted below.3. Transfer Restrictions. No Equity issued to the Executive may be transferred(subject to customary exceptions for estate planning, transfers at death and transfers to an entitycontrolled solely by the Executive and formed solely for the benefit of the Executive and hisimmediate family), except as permitted under drag-along, tag-along or registration rights.4. Tag-Along, Drag-Along and Registration Rights. Executive’s Equity will be subjectto customary tag-along drag-along and registration rights.5. Termination of Restrictions. The restrictions on transfer shall terminate in theevent of an IPO or other transaction whereby the Equity becomes publicly traded, subject to anylock-up restrictions imposed on other employee shareholders of the Company or its affiliates.6. Miscellaneous.(a) The validity, interpretation and effect of this Award Agreement shall be governed by thelaws of the State of Illinois, excluding the “conflicts of laws” rules thereof.(b) Signed copies of this Agreement may be executed in counterparts and/or sent by facsimileor email and shall be as effective and binding as original copies.
 
-2-

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Award Agreement on the day andyear first above written.         PRIME OFFICE COMPANY, LLC           By: /s/ David Lichtenstein      Name: David Lichtenstein     Title: President           /s/ Jeffrey A. Patterson         Jeffrey A. Patterson  
 
-3-
EXHIBIT NO. 11

                        ROTARY POWER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                  COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Twelve Months
                                                 Ended December 31,
                                                 1997          1996
                                                 ----          ----
<S>                                         <C>           <C>
PRIMARY

Shares outstanding,
  beginning of period                         6,641,432     3,391,432

Weighted average number
  of shares issued,
  retired and issuable
  share equivalents                            -522,552     1,110,883
                                            -----------   -----------

Weighted average number
  of common and common
  equivalent shares
  outstanding                                 6,118,880     4,502,265
                                            ===========   ===========

Net loss                                    $(5,032,819)  $(4,970,054)
                                            ===========   ===========

Net loss per
  common share                              $   (.82)     $   (1.10)
                                            ===========   ==========

FULLY DILUTED

Weighted average number
  of common and common
  equivalent shares
  outstanding as
  adjusted to full
  dilution                                    6,118,880     4,502,265
                                            ===========   ===========

Net loss                                    $(5,032,819)  $(4,970,054)
                                            ===========   ===========

Net loss per
  common share                              $   (.82)*    $   (1.10)*
                                            ===========   ===========

</TABLE>

*These calculations are submitted in accordance with SEC requirements, although
they are not in accordance with APB Opinion No. 15 because they are
anti-dilutive.
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, John Dow, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this 10-QSB for the period ending June 30 of 2007;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. 	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. 	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. 	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. 	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:   August 13, 2007 | JOHN DOW                        
|----------------------- | --------------------------------
|                        | John Dow
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3900 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 3900

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 1996

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
             planting flexibility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section. 1. Increased Planting Flexibility.--Section 118 of the 
Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 
U.S.C. 7218) is amended by adding the following new paragraph to 
subsection (b)(2):
                    ``(D) by a producer on contract acreage following a 
                crop that fails due to conditions beyond the producer's 
                control.''.
    Sec. 2. Conforming Amendment.--Subsection 118(b)(2) is amended:
    (a) at the end of paragraph (B), by striking ``or''; and
    (b) in clause (ii) of paragraph (C), by striking ``vegetable.'' and 
inserting ``vegetable; or''.
    Sec. 3. Conservation Reserve Program Regulations.--Not later than 
September 15, 1996, the Secretary shall issue regulations to implement 
the Conservation Reserve Program (16 U.S.C. 3831 et seq.), as amended 
by section 332 of the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act 
of 1996 (Public Law 104-127, April 4, 1996).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 2C

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-5 Filed 04/17/19 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-5 Filed 04/17/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-5 Filed 04/17/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-5 Filed 04/17/19 Page 4 of 4
#### Dianna L. STITH, Respondent, v. Jeffrey L. STITH, Appellant.

No. WD 49251.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 6, 1994.

Allan D. Seidel, Miller, Seidel and Havens, Trenton, for appellant.

Clifford A. Falzone, Moberly, for respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and KENNEDY and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from property division portions of dissolution of marriage decree.

The decree is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al Doc. 14

Dockets.Justia.com
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3976

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act and the Federal Deposit Insurance

Act to prohibit removal of members of the National Credit Union Administration Board and the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation except for cause, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. BACHUS (for himself, Mr. BARR, Mr. MCCOLLUM, and Mr. LEACH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Banking

and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act and the Federal

Deposit Insurance Act to prohibit removal of members

of the National Credit Union Administration Board and

the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation except for cause, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Regulator

5 Independence Protection Act’’.
2

•HR 3976 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL ONLY FOR CAUSE.

2 (a) NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

3 BOARD.—Section 102(c) of the Federal Credit Union Act

4 (12 U.S.C. 1752a(c)) is amended—

5 (1) in the 1st sentence, by striking ‘‘six years,’’

6 and inserting ‘‘6 years, unless sooner removed for

7 cause by the President,’’; and

8 (2) in the 3d sentence—

9 (A) by striking ‘‘may continue’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘shall continue’’; and

11 (B) by striking ‘‘has qualified’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘is appointed and has qualified’’.

13 (b) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION.—

14 Section 2(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12

15 U.S.C. 1812(c)) is amended—

16 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, unless

17 sooner removed for cause by the President’’ before

18 the period at the end; and

19 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘may con20 tinue’’ and inserting ‘‘shall continue’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 94-50740 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK ZEDELL CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CR-100

- - - - - - - - - - March 6, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judes. PER CURIAM: * Patrick Zedell Clark appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). He argues that the disparity between the statutory penalties for offenses involving "crack" cocaine and offenses involving other types of cocaine violates his equal protection and due process rights. Clark, however, waived the right to appeal pursuant to a valid provision in his plea agreement. See United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). APPEAL DISMISSED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 16, 2019

No. 04-19-00693-CR

IN RE John Michael POPE, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On October 9, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and because relator is represented by trial counsel, this court concludes relator is not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on October 16, 2019.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of October, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Estrada, Chief Deputy Clerk

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CR-12867, styled The State of Texas v. John Michael Pope, Jr., 

pending in the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela presiding.