alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          24,230
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,509
<INVENTORY>                                     32,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,164
<PP&E>                                         353,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                 130,653
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,211
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,211
<SALES>                                      1,468,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,485,105
<CGS>                                        1,181,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,451,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,031
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3900 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3900

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
             planting flexibility, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3900

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
             planting flexibility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 
    Section. 1. Increased Planting Flexibility.--Section 118 of the 
Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7218) is amended by adding 
the following new paragraph to subsection (b)(2):
                    ``(D) by a producer on contract acreage following a 
                crop that fails due to conditions beyond the producer's 
                control.''.
    Sec. 2. Conforming Amendment.--Subsection 118(b)(2) is amended:
    (a) at the end of paragraph (B), by striking ``or''; and
    (b) in clause (ii) of paragraph (C), by striking ``vegetable.'' and 
inserting ``vegetable; or''.
    Sec. 3. Conservation Reserve Program Regulations.--Not later than 
September 15, 1996, the Secretary shall issue regulations to implement 
the Conservation Reserve Program (16 U.S.C. 3831 et seq.), as amended 
by section 332 of the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform Act 
of 1996 (Public Law 104-127, April 4, 1996).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
4:09-cr-20127-TGB-MJH Doc # 53 Filed 02/23/17 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 387
4:09-cr-20127-TGB-MJH Doc # 53 Filed 02/23/17 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 388
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 20-1144

___________________________ 

United States of America

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Matthew Eric Dolven

 Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul

____________ 

Submitted: November 16, 2020

 Filed: February 2, 2021 

[Unpublished]

____________ 

Before SHEPHERD, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM. 

Matthew Dolven received a 360-month prison sentence after pleading guilty 

to two child-pornography counts. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a), (e) (production); 

2252(a)(2), (b)(1) (distribution). Although Dolven argues that his sentence is

unreasonable, we affirm. 
-2-

The district court1 varied downward after considering multiple mitigating 

factors. See United States v. Townsend, 617 F.3d 991, 995 (8th Cir. 2010) (per 

curiam) (“[The defendant] must show more than the fact that the district court 

disagreed with his view of what weight ought to be accorded [to] certain sentencing 

factors.”). “In these circumstances, it is nearly inconceivable that the court abused 

its discretion in not varying downward [even] further.” United States v. Lazarski, 

560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009).

Dolven’s other arguments fare no better. Although he complains that the 

Sentencing Guidelines for child-pornography offenses are “overly punitive,” the 

district court had no obligation to vary downward on pure “policy grounds,” even if

it could have done so. United States v. Black, 670 F.3d 877, 882 (8th Cir. 2012). 

Nor has he demonstrated that a 360-month prison sentence creates “unwarranted 

sentence disparities.” 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6); see United States v. Carr, 895 F.3d 

1083, 1091 (8th Cir. 2018) (“[A] sentencing[-]disparity argument requires a showing 

that the [defendant] and his comparators are similar in conduct and record.” (internal 

quotation marks omitted)). 

We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the 

District of Minnesota.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 949 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 949

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
 thirds vote on a stand-alone bill to increase the statutory limit on 
                            the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 3, 2009

  Mr. Neugebauer (for himself, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. 
 Olson, Ms. Jenkins, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Paul, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Gingrey 
  of Georgia, Mr. Lamborn, Ms. Granger, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Hensarling, 
   Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Harper, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Kline of 
 Minnesota, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Barton 
of Texas, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Austria, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. 
     Posey, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. McCarthy of 
  California, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Walden, Mr. Wittman, Mr. 
 Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. Akin, Ms. Fallin, Mr. Smith 
    of Nebraska, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, Mr. 
 Marchant, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Jones, and Mr. 
 Goodlatte) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a two-
 thirds vote on a stand-alone bill to increase the statutory limit on 
                            the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives (relating to the statutory limit on the public debt) is 
amended by striking clauses 1 through 4, by redesignating clause 5 as 
clause 3, and by inserting before clause 3 the following new clauses:
    ``1. It shall not be in order to consider any bill or joint 
resolution, or amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that 
increases the statutory limit on the public debt if there is any other 
matter in such measure.
    ``2. A bill or joint resolution, or amendment thereto or conference 
report thereon, that increases the statutory limit on the public debt 
may not be considered as passed or agreed to unless so determined by a 
vote of not less than two-thirds of the Members voting, a quorum being 
present.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated February 12, 2008 and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on February 21, 2008, (73 FR 9593), Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Attn: Regulatory Compliance, 9115 Hague Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleLysergic acid diethylamide (7315)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (THC) (7370)
IAlphamethadol (9605)
IHydromorphone (9150)
IIBenzoylecgonine (9180)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances for use in diagnostic products. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection 
                    ( print page 45787)
                    and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: July 29, 2008. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. E8-17958 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### Mark GOETTE, Marsha Goette and Lois Moody, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MASP, INC., and Richard Arver Stranger, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 68316.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

March 26, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 30,1996.

Application to Transfer Denied June 25,1996.

Anthony L. Anderson, Clayton, for appellants.

Sam P. Rynearson, Susan M. Moore, St. Louis, for respondents.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal the circuit court’s denial of their motion nunc pro tunc and their motion for Rehearing or to Alter or Amend Judgment. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SavWatt USA, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Isaac H. Sutton,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 23, 2010                     /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CRIMINAL NO. 09-30223

JOHN JESSE AUITO,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND SUPPORTING BRIEF

Pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United

States of America hereby moves for leave to dismiss without prejudice the complaint

against defendant. In this case, the government needs additional time

(1) to develop and obtain evidence sufficient to establish

defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt;

(2) to investigate the full extent of the offense(s) in question and

identify all other individuals who should be held criminally

responsible for the offense(s); or

(3) to decide whether criminal prosecution of defendant for the

offense(s) in question is in the public interest.

See generally United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 790-96 (1977); 18 U.S.C. §

3161(d)(1). The government’s ability to prosecute this case properly would be

2:09-mj-30223-DUTY Doc # 7 Filed 05/19/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 13
substantially impaired were it required to proceed to indictment or information within

the 30-day period prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(b),

3161(h). Accordingly, the government requests leave to dismiss the complaint

without prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

TERRENCE BERG 

United States Attorney

s/JENNIFER M. GORLAND

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

Phone: 313-226-9707

E-Mail: Jennifer.Gorland@usdoj.gov

Bar Number: P38384

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 19, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing

document with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Rafael Villarruel, Esq.

s/JENNIFER M. GORLAND

Assistant United States Attorney

211 W. Fort Street, Suite 2001

Detroit, MI 48226

Phone: 313.226.9707

E-Mail: Jennifer.Gorland@usdoj.gov

Bar Number: P38384

2:09-mj-30223-DUTY Doc # 7 Filed 05/19/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 14
ARTURO ORTIZ

,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections

,

Respondent.

__________________________ __/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5565

Opinion filed February 25, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Arturo Ortiz, pro se

, P etitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee; Jennif er Parker, General Counsel,

Department of Corrections, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Joseph C. Lawler, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 14, 2010



By:

/s/    JOSEPH C.
LAWLERJoseph C. LawlerChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 8**

 

Listing of Significant Subsidiaries ofKerzner International Limited as of December 31, 2004

 
| **Name of Company**                               | ** ** | **Country  of Incorporation** |
|---------------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|
| Kerzner International Bahamas Limited(1)          |       | The Bahamas                   |
| Kerzner International North America, Inc.(2) |       | United States                 |
| Kerzner Investments Palmilla, Inc.(3)        |       | The Bahamas                   |
| One&Only Management(4)                        |       | British Virgin Islands        |
| Kerzner International Management Limited(5)       |       | British Virgin Islands        |

 

----

(1)                                Ownerof substantially all of the Bahamian subsidiaries.  Directly or indirectly wholly owns tensubsidiaries, all of which are organized in the Commonwealth of The Bahamas.

 

(2)                                Ownerof all of the U.S. subsidiaries. Directly or indirectly wholly owns 19 subsidiaries, 16 of which areorganized in the United States and three of which are organized in Mexico andrelate to the management and development of the One&Only Palmilla.

 

(3)                                Ownerof the 50% interest in the One&Only Palmilla.

 

(4)                                Operatorof the five Mauritius management agreements and the One&Only Kanuhuramanagement agreement.  Through the yearended December 31, 2004, Kerzner held an 80% ownership interest inOne&Only Management, which decreased to 75% effective January 1, 2005.

 

(5)                                Ownerof the management agreement for the One&Only Royal Mirage in Dubai.  Also receives marketing and administrativefees from One&Only Management related to the Mauritius and the One&OnlyKanuhura management agreements.

 

----
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-76035), pertaining to the registration of 9,224,263 shares of
Class A Common Stock of Dan River Inc.; the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-67083) pertaining to The Bibb Company 1997 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, Dan
River Inc., Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, as Amended, Dan River Inc.
1997 Stock Incentive Plan, Dan River Inc. 1997 Stock Plan for Outside Directors;
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36542) pertaining to the 2000
Long-term Incentive Plan; and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-52458) pertaining to the Dan River Inc. Nonqualified 401(k) and Deferred
Compensation Plan for Highly Compensated Employees and Directors; of our report
dated February 3, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Dan River Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 28, 2002.



                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Greensboro, North Carolina
February 20, 2003
Exhibit 10.25
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Third Amendment
 R E C I T A L S :
   Amendment to Paragraph 4 (a)
  Amendment to Paragraph 4 (b)
   1




---



##### 



Amendment to Paragraph 4 (h)
  Amendment to Paragraph 3 (i)
  Effectiveness
 Status of Employment Agreement
  /s/ Rick LepleyDate:
    
    12/3/2008
    
    
    
    RICK LEPLEYA. C. MOORE ARTS & CRAFTS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Michael JoyceDate:
    
    12/3/2008
    
    
    
    
    
    MICHAEL JOYCE, Chairman
  2