alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shopper's Wallet, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dejan Mirkovic, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the
          operation of the Company.


                               /s/ Dejan Mirkovic
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Dejan Mirkovic
                               Principal Financial Officer
                               October 30, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification
shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether
made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by ss.906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-1972 and File No.  333-05771) and Form S-3
(File No.  333-72664) of Everest Re Group, Ltd. of our report dated February 14,
2002 relating to the financial  statements and financial  statement schedules of
Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 26, 2002
**EXHIBIT 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of MercantileBank Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-52620, 333-91434, 333-99853, 333-103242,333-117763, 333-119767 and 333-138328) and Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-59154, 333-103376,333-108929, and 333-107814) of our report dated February 20, 2007 relating to theconsolidated financial statements of Mercantile Bank Corporation asof December 31, 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and2005, which report is  included in the 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Mercantile Bank Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007.       /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC         Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Resources
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Gary L. Whitlock
----------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Whitlock
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2004
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4102

To provide regulatory relief for certain farm transportation of hazardous

materials.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1996

Mr. EWING (for himself, Mr. BUYER, Mr. POSHARD, Mr. BARCIA, Mr.

HASTERT, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. GANSKE,

Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. BUNNING of Kentucky, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. WELLER,

Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. LIGHTFOOT, Mr. COBLE, Mr.

BOEHNER, Mr. LEACH, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. NETHERCUTT, Mr.

BARRETT of Nebraska, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. ROSE, Mr.

LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. MCHUGH, and Mr. TOWNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To provide regulatory relief for certain farm transportation

of hazardous materials.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm Transportation

5 Regulatory Relief Act’’.
2

•HR 4102 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON REGULATION OF AGRICULTURAL

2 PRODUCTION MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any regulation issued by the De4 partment of Transportation relating to the transportation

5 of agricultural production material as a hazardous mate6 rial under chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code, shall

7 not prohibit a State from providing an exception from the

8 hazardous materials transportation regulations for farm9 ers and retailers who are providing not-for-hire intrastate

10 transportation of an agricultural production material from

11 a source of supply to a farm, from a farm to another farm,

12 from a field to another field on a farm, or from the farm

13 back to the source of supply.

14 (b) AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION MATERIAL DE15 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘agricultural production

16 material’’ means a hazardous material that is used to sup17 port the production of an agricultural commodity and in18 cludes pesticides, fertilizers, and fuels.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-18055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of 
such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the 
bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR), 1301.34(a), this is notice that on June 5, 2008, Boehringer 
Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc., 2820 N. Normandy Drive, Petersburg, Virginia 
23805, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Phenylacetone 
(8501), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance to bulk 
manufacture amphetamine.
    Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request 
for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43 and in 
such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA. 22152; and must be filed no later 
than September 5, 2008.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745), all applicants 
for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substance in 
schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such 
registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 
1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: July 30, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E8-18055 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 16-6001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 21, 2024 is amended 

as follows:

On page 7, line 13, "of" is replaced with "on"

On page 63, line 12, "148" is replaced with "14-15"

The opinion of Judge Howard, dissenting in part, is amended 

as follows:

On page 79, line 13, "1036" is replaced with "316-17"
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT LONG, #270764,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 2:09-CV-12124

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

TIMOTHY BALL,

Respondent. 

_______________________________/

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Opinion and Order entered and filed on this

date, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

DAVID WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

By: s/Julie Owens

Deputy Clerk

Dated at Detroit, Michigan

July 26, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Robert Long, 270764,

Camp Lehman, 5135 Hartwick Pines Road, Grayling, MI 49738 and the attorneys of record

on this date, July 26, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-12124-AC-RSW Doc # 11 Filed 07/26/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 381
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3888 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3888

  To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow 
 small communities to use limited space in public facilities acquired, 
 constructed, or rehabilitated using community development block grant 
                  funds for local government offices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 1996

Mr. Richardson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow 
 small communities to use limited space in public facilities acquired, 
 constructed, or rehabilitated using community development block grant 
                  funds for local government offices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Communities CDBG Multipurpose 
Facilities Act''.

SEC. 2. CDBG ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.

    Section 105(a) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 
(42 U.S.C. 5304(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``(except for buildings 
        for the general conduct of government) and inserting the 
        following: ``(not including buildings for the general conduct 
        of government, except that a portion of a public facility 
        assisted under this paragraph may be used for the types of 
        activities conducted in buildings for the general conduct of 
        government, but only if not more than 25 percent of the square 
        footage of the facility is so used and such activities are 
        conducted for a unit of general local government having a 
        population not exceeding 5,000)''; and
            (2) in paragraph (14), by striking ``(except for buildings 
        for the general conduct of government) and inserting the 
        following: ``(not including buildings for the general conduct 
        of government, except that a portion of a public facility 
        assisted under this clause may be used for the types of 
        activities conducted in buildings for the general conduct of 
        government, but only if not more than 25 percent of the square 
        footage of the facility is so used and such activities are 
        conducted for a unit of general local government having a 
        population not exceeding 5,000)''.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY.

    The amendments made by section 2 shall apply with respect to use of 
a portion of a public facility for the types of activities conducted in 
buildings for the general conduct of government occurring after June 
30, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
aitta 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

RICHARD DONTA SATTERFIELD, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 69675 

FILED 

MAR 3 0 2016 

TRACIE K. LINDEMAN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK 

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a 

memorandum and motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the 

aforementioned order, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 

352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge 

Richard Donta Satterfield 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 24, 2009
    /s/ Ricardo Figueiredo BomenyRicardo Figueiredo BomenyChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer
**  **

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Paul Donaldson, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp.

 

Date: May ___, 2013

 

By:	*/s/ Paul Donaldson*	

Paul Donaldson

Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                                                                            |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Anthony F. Rotondo                                                                                                          |   |   |   |   |
| By: Anthony F. Rotondo                                                                                                     |   |   |   |   |
| Title: President and Chief Executive Officer         (Principal Executive Officer) |   |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                              |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Don Knight                                                                                                    |   |   |   |   |
| By: Don Knight                                                                                                    |   |   |   |   |
| Title: Vice President, Finance         (Principal Financial Officer) |   |   |   |   |

----
#### Geri Goeggel BROWN, Claimant/Appellant, v. JON-N-COMPANY, Employer/Respondent.

No. 65629.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 16, 1994.

Harry J. Nichols, Private Atty., St. Louis, for appellant.

*937Robert W. Haeckel, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) denial of her claim for permanent partial disability benefits and medical expenses as well as her claim against the second injury fund. The Commission’s order denying compensation is supported by substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.-16(b).
EXHIBIT 10.55



Summary of Executive Bonus Arrangements for 2004 Bonuses

and in respect of Restricted Stock Grants in 2005



On March 15, 2005, the Board of Directors of Jameson Inns, Inc. (the Company), approved the grant of cash bonuses and shares of restricted
stock to be awarded to the named executive officers in recognition for work performed and goals accomplished during 2004. The stock grants will all be made on April 1, 2005 pursuant to the Jameson 2003 Stock Incentive Plan. One-third of the
restricted shares will vest on each of the first three anniversary dates of the date of grant. The bonuses and stock grants were previously approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, subject to final approval by the entire
Board.



The amounts of the bonus awards and the numbers of
shares of restricted stock to be awarded to executive officers listed below are:



|                                                                                  |  |                   |         |                             |        
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | --------------------------- | -------
|Executive Officer                                                                 |  | Cash Bonus Amount |         | Number of Restricted Shares
|Thomas W. Kitchin, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |  | $                 | 100,000 |                             | 100,000
|                                                                                  |  |                  
|Craig R. Kitchin, President and Chief Financial Officer                           |  | $                 | 50,000  |                             | 50,000 
|                                                                                  |  |                  
|Steven A. Curlee, Vice President  Legal and General Counsel                      |  | $                 | 25,000  |                             | 35,000 
|                                                                                  |  |                  
|Martin D. Brew, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer                            |  | $                 | 15,000  |                             | 30,000 



The Board of Directors
further authorized the Company to pay as an additional bonus to each named grantee of restricted stock a cash amount sufficient to pay the federal and state income taxes incurred by such individual as a result of the vesting of the shares of
restricted stock. The bonuses are to be paid only if and when the restricted shares vest.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 16, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 37022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17430]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

25 CFR Part 290

RIN 1076-AD14


Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document modifies the preamble to a proposed rule 
published on June 7, 1996 regarding tribal revenue allocation plans. 
This correction clarifies that the proposed rule applies prospectively 
to plans submitted for approval from the effective date of the final 
rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Pierskalla, Management Analyst, Indian Gaming Management Staff 
Office, at 202-219-4068.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In proposed rule FR Doc 96-14061, beginning 
on page 29044 in the issue of Friday, June 7, 1996, make the following 
correction on page 29044:
    1. In ``Supplementary Information'' add at the end of the second 
paragraph the following, ``This rule applies to Tribal Revenue 
Allocation Plans submitted and approved after the effective date of the 
final rule. Previously approved Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans need 
not be resubmitted for review and approval by the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs and continue to remain in effect. However, amendments to 
approved Tribal Revenue Allocation Plans will need to be submitted to 
the BIA for approval under the proposed regulation.''


    Dated: July 1, 1996
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-17430 Filed 7-15-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-M
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.66


 


Maximum Pledge Contract


 


Contract No.:2013JIYINZUIBAOZIDI13121740


 


Pledgor: Hebei Chuanglian Finance Leasing
Co., Ltd. 


 


Pledgee : CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : September 2, 2013


 


Pledge Definition: To ensure multiple loans Party B (Pledgee)
has lent to Hebei Xuhua Trading Co., Ltd, Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Pledge Guarantee hereunder for Party
B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB120, 000,000


 


Pledge Term : From September 2, 2013 to February 16, 2015