Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 9, 1996 / Notices 36035

engineering services, inventory

maintenance, and delivery services on

its HM sales. SKC does not provide

these services on its CEP sales. STC

provides inventory maintenance, after

sales-services and warranty assistance,

entertainment of customers, and

marketing research on its HM sales. STC

does not provide these services on its

CEP sales. Therefore, the selling

functions performed by each of the

respondents for CEP sales are

sufficiently different than for HM sales

so as to establish different levels of

trade.

Because we compared these CEP sales

to HM sales at a different level of trade,

we examined whether a level-of-trade

adjustment may be appropriate. In this

case each of the respondents only sold

at one level of trade in the home market;

therefore, there is no basis upon which

any of the respondents has

demonstrated a consistent pattern of

price differences between levels of

trade. Further, we do not have the

information which would allow us to

examine pricing patterns of

respondents’ sales of other similar

products, and there is no other

respondent’s or other information on the

record to analyze whether the

adjustment is appropriate.

Because the data available do not

provide an appropriate basis for making

a level-of-trade adjustment but the level

of trade in Korea for each respondent is

at a more advanced stage than the level

of trade of the CEP sales, a CEP offset

is appropriate in accordance with

section 773(a)(7)(B) of the Act. Each

respondent claimed a CEP offset, which

we applied to NV. We based the CEP

offset amount on the amount of home

market indirect selling expenses, and

limited the deduction for HM indirect

selling expenses to the amount of

indirect selling expenses incurred on

sales in the United States, in accordance

with section 772(d)(1)(D) of the Act. The

level-of-trade methodology used in this

review is based on the facts particular

to this review. The Department will

continue to examine its policy for

making level-of-trade comparisons and

adjustments for the final results of this

review.

Fair Value Comparisons

To determine whether sales of PET

film in the United States were made at

less than fair value, we compared USP

to the NV, as described in the ‘‘United

States Price’’ and ‘‘Normal Value’’

sections of this notice. In accordance

with section 777(A) of the Act, we

calculated monthly weighted-average

prices for NV and compared these to

individual U.S. transactions.

Preliminary Results of Review

We preliminarily determine that the

following margins exist for the period

June 1, 1994 through May 31, 1995:

Manufacturer/exporter Margin

Kolon ............................................. 0.14

SKC ............................................... 1.91

STC ............................................... 4.98

Parties to this proceeding may request

disclosure within five days of

publication of this notice and any

interested party may request a hearing

within 10 days of publication. Any

hearing, if requested, will be held 44

days after the date of publication, or the

first working day thereafter. Interested

parties may submit case briefs and/or

written comments no later than 30 days

after the date of publication. Rebuttal

briefs and rebuttals to written

comments, limited to issues raised in

such briefs or comments, may be filed

no later than 37 days after the date of

publication. The Department will

publish the final results of this

administrative review, which will

include the results of its analysis of

issues raised in any such written

comments or at a hearing.

The Department shall determine, and

Customs shall assess, antidumping

duties on all appropriate entries.

Individual differences between USP and

NV may vary from the percentages

stated above. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

Customs. The final results of this review

shall be the basis for the assessment of

antidumping duties on entries of

merchandise covered by the

determination and for future deposits of

estimated duties.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective upon

completion of the final results of these

administrative reviews for all shipments

of PET film from the Republic of Korea

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,

for consumption on or after the

publication date of the final results of

these administrative reviews, as

provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Act:

(1) The cash deposit rate for reviewed

firms will be the rate established in the

final results of administrative review;

(2) for merchandise exported by

manufacturers or exporters not covered

in these reviews but covered in the

original less-than-fair value (LTFV)

investigation or a previous review, the

cash deposit will continue to be the

most recent rate published in the final

determination or final results for which

the manufacturer or exporter received a

company-specific rate; (3) if the exporter

is not a firm covered in these reviews,

or the original investigation, but the

manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate

will be that established for the

manufacturer of the merchandise in the

final results of these reviews, or the

LTFV investigation; and (4) if neither

the exporter nor the manufacturer is a

firm covered in these or any previous

reviews, the cash deposit rate will be

4.82%, the ‘‘all others’’ rate established

in the LTFV investigation.

This notice also serves as a

preliminary reminder to importers of

their responsibility under 19 CFR

353.26(b) to file a certificate regarding

the reimbursement of antidumping

duties prior to liquidation of the

relevant entries during these review

periods. Failure to comply with this

requirement could result in the

Secretary’s presumption that

reimbursement of antidumping duties

occurred and the subsequent assessment

of double antidumping duties.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with Section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1).

Dated: July 1, 1996.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 96–17464 Filed 7–8–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 070296B]

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management

Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery

Management Council (Council) will

convene a public meeting of the Red

Drum Stock Assessment Panel (Panel).

DATES: This meeting will begin at 1:00

p.m. on July 29, 1996, and will conclude

at 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the National Marine Fisheries Service

Southeast Fisheries Science Center, 75

Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wayne Swingle, Executive Director,

5401 West Kennedy Boulevard, Suite

331, Tampa, FL 33609; telephone: (813)

228–2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Panel

will review stock assessment

information prepared by NMFS for the

Gulf stock and will assess whether the
36036 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 9, 1996 / Notices

stock has been restored to a level above

the overfishing threshold. If the stock

has been restored, the Panel will

develop an estimate of the range of

acceptable biological catch (ABC) for the

stock. The Council will review the

Panel’s report at its September meeting

and may specify a total allowable catch

(TAC) within the range of ABC for the

fishery. Implementation of a TAC will,

however, require an amendment to the

fishery management plan for red drum.

The amendment action would require

approximately 9 months for

implementation.

The red drum stock was classified as

overfished in 1986 and harvest and

possession of red drum in Federal

waters was prohibited in 1987. Most

actions to restore the stock have been

taken by the individual Gulf states.

Special Accommodations

This meeting is physically accessible

to people with disabilities. Requests for

sign language interpretation or other

auxiliary aids should be directed to

Anne Alford at the Council (see

ADDRESSES) by July 22, 1996.

Dated: July 2, 1996.

Richard W. Surdi,

Acting Director, Office of Fisheries

Conservation and Management, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 96–17439 Filed 7–8–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F

[I.D. 070296A]

Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management

Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council’s Bluefish

Advisory Panel (together with the

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries

Commission’s Bluefish Advisory Panel)

will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July

24, 1996, from 1:30 p.m. until 5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Holiday Inn at the Crossings, 801

Greenwich Avenue, Warwick, RI;

telephone: (401) 732–6000.

Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery

Management Council, 300 S. New

Street, Dover, DE 19901; telephone:

(302) 674–2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David R. Keifer, Executive Director;

telephone: (302) 674–2331.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

purpose of this meeting is for discussion

of technical/assessment report,

Amendment #1 overfishing definition,

and Amendment #1 management

measures.

Special Accommodations

This meeting is physically accessible

to people with disabilities. Requests for

sign language interpretation or other

auxiliary aids should be directed to

Joanna Davis at the Council (see

ADDRESSES) at least 5 days prior to the

meeting date.

Dated: July 2, 1996.

Richard W. Surdi,

Acting Director, Office of Fisheries

Conservation and Management, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 96–17438 Filed 7–8–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F

[Docket No. 960111003–6068–03; I.D.

070296C]

Pacific Halibut Fisheries; 1996 Halibut

Landing Report No. 4

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Inseason action.

SUMMARY: The Assistant Administrator

for Fisheries, NOAA, on behalf of the

International Pacific Halibut

Commission (IPHC), publishes these

inseason actions pursuant to IPHC

regulations approved by the U.S.

Government to govern the Pacific

halibut fishery. These actions are

intended to enhance the conservation of

the Pacific halibut stock.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven Pennoyer, 907–586–7221;

William W. Stelle, Jr., 206–526–6140; or

Donald McCaughran, 206–634–1838.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The IPHC,

under the Convention between the

United States of America and Canada

for the Preservation of the Halibut

Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean

and Bering Sea (signed at Ottawa,

Ontario, on March 2, 1953), as amended

by a Protocol Amending the Convention

(signed at Washington, DC, on March

29, 1979), has issued this inseason

action pursuant to IPHC regulations

governing the Pacific halibut fishery.

The regulations have been approved by

NMFS (60 FR 14651, March 20, 1995,

and amended at 61 FR 11337, March 20,

1996). On behalf of the IPHC, this

inseason action is published in the

Federal Register to provide additional

notice of its effectiveness, and to inform

persons subject to the inseason action of

the restrictions and requirements

established therein.

Inseason Action

1996 Halibut Landing Report No. 4

Area 2B Commercial Fishery Update

Halibut landings from Area 2B total

4.45 million pounds (2,018.50 metric

tons (mt)) through June 17, leaving 5.07

million pounds (2,299.73 mt) of the

catch limit to be caught. The fishery will

continue until all Individual Vessel

Quotas (IFQ) have been filled, or

November 15, whichever is earlier.

Annette Island Reserve Fishery in Area

2C.

The Metlakatla Indian community has

been authorized by the U.S. Government

to conduct a commercial halibut fishery

within the Annette Island Reserve. Four

48-hour fishing periods occurred

between April 27 and June 10,

producing a total catch of 21,400

pounds (9.70 mt).

Alaskan Commercial Fishery Update

It is estimated that the following

catches and number of landings were

made in the Alaskan IFQ and

Community Development Quota (CDQ)

fisheries through June 12, 1996.

Area

Catch

limit

(000’s

pounds)

Catch

(000’s

pounds)

Number

of landings

2C ....................... 9,000 4,803 1,334

3A ....................... 20,000 8,196 1,139

3B ....................... 3,700 806 131

4A ....................... 1,950 268 40

4B ....................... 2,310 314 16

4C ....................... 770 1 2

4D ....................... 770 157 7

4E ....................... 20 34 45

Total ................ 38,620 14,579 2,714

During the same time period in 1995,

March 15 through June 9, 8.0 million

pounds (3,628.77 mt) were landed in the

Alaskan IFQ and CDQ fisheries.

Dated: July 2, 1996.

Richard W. Surdi,

Acting Director, Office of Fisheries

Conservation and Management, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 96–17437 Filed 7–8–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P

[I.D. 070196F]

Marine Mammals; Scientific Research

Permits (P607 and P614)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.