alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,398                  11,902
<SECURITIES>                                    57,671                 208,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                  563,058                 274,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,384                   1,109
<PP&E>                                         107,663                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,174                 495,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,233                  15,435
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       408,809                 479,702
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   757,174                 495,137
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,421                   6,467
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                35,177                   4,308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,244                   2,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,244                   2,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,244                   2,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68                     .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68                     .06
        

</TABLE>
0n% with appropriatJ.ono raad@ by tha LagialatuN 

oub ot the State W#my IbnQ. Ho further &aprovssant of miQ aystra ahall be made with tJii 

ala pi or Wltth my 1mar9 furnished by thr oati:;- 

tlsr exwopt for ,the aaquisi tinn of rig:! to-of-say 

ahloa larg ba turalshsd by the oauntlem, their 

rubUlvl8iaaa nr CatineQ rodl 41rtrlota.w 

We think tha Iewuago of this motion of t& bill 

clear end ~rments 80 dikfoulty In InterpraUnq thr interiti0n 0r tb0 :0gmmm1, an3 unlc?oa mm? nther pravinkan of 

tha IQW pfovl4a8 SE oxwc,ptlnn to 23rotlon 3, it 18 2ur 0pini.m 

that HU furtkcsr lwprororoent sf Stat@ hlghvrsya cay bo nrr%e by 

oouat~ies p&litlan;l suhdirlalona or road diqtrioto :)f t!;e 

aa tea 4 mover, SubmotSbn (8) of Sea&ion b ,f Bsms Rlli 

688 sentafar the f..~llorln.~ l$)n.+m,qsr 

.*Xn daci ti0n $0 ana rag4rai488 of tk 0tfi0r 

on8 ot thla Aot, all bands voted by. a 

prior to Tanasry 2, 193s inrofrr us 

oi 8une wurm or may ho i rsued *rid the 

proaaldo aotually expend*4 in thr am5truotlan 

or read8 whlah am ,a ptt or the dnmigmtcd 

myatma of Btahr bl@m?yn, uhall bs sli&bla 

64 partiorl to ia the dirrributlon of the 

money6 ooe r ng Snto said Cou~nOr an6 Rocld b?abriOt %t&bway frond, the aQa# ha prOVidU? fW 

ether bondr under this ,Aat end sa of the dste 

at the adgfdi00 of rrld roe4 no 4 phrt of 

t&t state syaturl * y *". 

It is obvlour from Q rea4lng or chs Ea~agoinp arotJ~on 

that wo beta 6n $ICaeFt?Ofi t:, :3not!sn 3, ebovs qw00, aaJ a4 

to the rallditp 3f thlo seatlon, wit refer pm to bur optni?n 

zlu*bar (r-1334, oiWrosaitd to thtg Rdnuxabls %!urphy Oole, County 

AuUitor of Liberty County, tibarty, Trxkr. It W-m Dur aonofu~ion thorsin that tbo prOVisionA at SQattbn 6, ahflaOtiJa 

(A) of AAid btll althbugh in 0onfli4t with Ssdtlun 3 thQX44f, 

murB be oonrtru ob ~LB an amrphlan and shmld be petittti to 

nItma.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 





 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

SEE REVERSE SIDE 
 FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 CUSIP
89685A 10 2 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 

is the owner of 
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF 
 TRIVASCULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 
 transferable on
the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers. 
 Dated: 
 SECRETARY 
 CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT AND CEO 

AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING INCORPORATED - MINNEAPOLIS 







 



 
 THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE
RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF
THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES
THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED. 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM – as tenants in common UTMA – Custodian 
 (Cust) (Minor) 
 TEN ENT – as tenants by
entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors 
 JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act

 and not as tenants in common (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
 For value received _____ hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated 

NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN
EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
 SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 

ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES
TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC
ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3979

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit

for the contribution of books to any library.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

refundable credit for the contribution of books to any library.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF

4 BOOKS AND EQUIPMENT TO LIBRARIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of sub6 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

7 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by redes8 ignating section 35 as section 36 and by inserting after

9 section 34 the following new section:
2

•HR 3979 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 35. CREDIT FOR CONTRIBUTIONS OF BOOKS OR

2 EQUIPMENT TO LIBRARIES.

3 ‘‘In the case of an individual, there shall be allowed

4 as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle an

5 amount equal to the value of any book or equipment con6 tributed to a library.’’

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

8 for such subpart C is amended by striking the last item

9 and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 35. Credit for contribution of books or equipment to libraries.

‘‘Sec. 36. Overpayments of tax.’’

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

11 this section shall apply to contributions after the date of

12 the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending after

13 such date.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3887 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3887

 To repeal the provision of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code, 
  under which certain Members of Congress are eligible for immediate 
               retirement after serving in 9 Congresses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 1996

Mr. Gejdenson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the provision of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code, 
  under which certain Members of Congress are eligible for immediate 
               retirement after serving in 9 Congresses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Repeal of the 9-Term Clause Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    (a) In General.--The last sentence of subsection (g) of section 
8336 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1)''; and
            (2) by striking ``or (2) serving in 9 Congresses''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section--
            (1) shall take effect at the beginning of the 105th 
        Congress; and
            (2) shall apply with respect to separations occurring 
        during the 105th Congress or later.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FIRESTONE DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS, LLC,

f/k/a BFS DIVERSIFIED PRODUCTS, LLC, and

FIRESTONE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS

COMPANY, LLC,

Plaintiffs

v.

ALPHA ENGINEERED REFRIGERATION

COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 09-10992

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 10).

The Court issued a scheduling order in this matter setting September 25, 2009, as the

deadline for Defendant’s response to the motion. In addition, the Court set a hearing date

of December 2, 2009. Defendant has failed to respond to the dispositive motion and did

not appear at the time set for oral argument. The Court has reviewed the pleadings and

finds summary judgment is appropriate. 

It is undisputed that Plaintiffs contracted with Defendant to design and construct two

environmental test chambers. It also is undisputed that Plaintiffs paid Defendant

$163,000; however, Defendant neither delivered the test chambers nor refunded Plaintiffs’

money. Consequently, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have established they are entitled to

summary judgment on their breach of contract claim. Finally, in their supplemental filing

Plaintiffs request $163,000 in damages as well as $19,113.42 in prejudgment interest, and

2:09-cv-10992-MOB-MJH Doc # 13 Filed 12/11/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 93
$350 in court costs. Defendant has not contested the requested amounts. The Court

finds Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment in the amount of $182,463.42.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date: December 11, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were mailed and/or electronically filed to counsel of record on this

date.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10992-MOB-MJH Doc # 13 Filed 12/11/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 94
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAIME RAY BERRY, Petitioner, vs. MS. PAM FEIL, LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR; MR. ROBERT LEGRAND, WARDEN, LOVELOCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER; MR. JAMES G. COX, DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents. No. 68319 

# FILED JUL 2 8 2016

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the Lovelock Correctional Center and Nevada Department of Corrections to make notary services available without having to present identification with a signature. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. The instant petition raises factual issues that are better addressed in the district court in the first instance. See Round Hill Gen. Improvement Din. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) ("When disputed factual issues are critical in demonstrating the propriety of a writ of

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA to; i 947A .040J.

J.

J. mandamus, the writ should be sought in the district court, with appeal from an adverse judgnient to this court."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

cc: Jaime Ray Berry Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A me
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 5895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. APP. 2, 
section 10(a)(2), notice is hereby given that the U.S. Small Business 
Administration (SBA) National Advisory Council (NAC) will hold a public 
meeting on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 2 p.m. (eastern). The purpose 
of the meeting is to discuss and outline FY 2008 projects for the NAC.
    The meeting will be open to the public. Anyone wishing to 
participate must contact Mina Wales or Adrienne Abney-Cole by phone or 
e-mail in order to be added to the agenda. Mina Wales, NAC Designated 
Federal Officer, 202-205-7180, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8f5d1d6d996efd9d4ddcbf8cbdad996dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="632e0a0d024d34020f0610231001024d040c15">[email protected]</span></a> or Adrienne Abney-
Cole, NAC Committee Management Specialist, 202-205-6742, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce8faabca7aba0a0abe08faca0abb7e38da1a2ab8ebdacafe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dc9db8aeb5b9b2b2b9f29dbeb2b9a5f19fb3b0b99cafbebdf2bbb3aa">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The meeting will take place using an audio conferencing system. To 
participate, please call our toll free conferencing service at 1-866-
740-1260 and enter access code 3711001 at the prompt.
    For more information about the National Advisory Council, please 
visit our Web site at http://www.sba.gov/nac/index.html.

Cherylyn Lebon,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-1768 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4119

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United

Courthouse’’.Bootle Federal Building and United Statesin Macon, Georgia, as the ‘‘William AugustusStates courthouse located at 475 Mulberry Street
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4119

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia,

as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4119 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle

5 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

11 Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States

12 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27,

1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3022-3023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1697]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP90-137-029]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund 
Report

January 31, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 5, 1996, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing with the 
Commission, under protest, its Refund Report made in compliance with 
ordering Paragraph (D) of the Commission's ``Order Denying Rehearing, 
Granting Requests for Exemptions and Ordering Refunds'' issued December 
6, 1995 in Docket Nos. RP90-137-020 RP90-137-021, RP90-137-022, RP90-
137-023, RP90-137-025 and RP90-137-026.
    Williston Basin states that on December 22, 1995, refunds were sent 
to applicable shippers for the take-or-pay volumetric surcharge amounts 
previously collected through transportation rates charged for the gas 
placed in storage in accordance with Rate Schedule S-2 Service 
Agreements between Williston Basin and such applicable shippers. These 
refunds, for the period November 1, 1990 through August 31, 1995, also 
include interest through December 22, 1995, in accordance with Section 
154.501 of the Commission's Regulations.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before January 31, 1996. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make Protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are 

[[Page 3023]]
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1697 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Victor M. Garcia, Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 10, 2008



| |  |  |  |                                                  
| |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | /s/ VICTOR M. GARCIA                             
| |  |  |  | Victor M. Garcia                                 
| |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2053

_____________________________

TYRONE RONDELL JEFFERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

July 18, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WINOKUR, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Wade Martin Rolle of Wade Rolle & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville,

for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

REGINALD WORTHY,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-11614

Hon. Sean F. Cox

v. Mag. Judge Michael Hluchaniuk

MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

d/b/a AT&T MICHIGAN,

Defendant.

INDEX OF UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS

S. Gagne v. Northwestern Nat’l Ins. Co. opinion

T. Krohn v. Sedgwick James of Michigan, Inc. opinion

U. Barrett v Kirtland Community College opinion

V. Polk v. Yellow Freight System, Inc. opinion

W. Smith v. Michigan Dept. of Corrections et al opinion

X. Syrowatka v. County of Washtenaw opinion

8467696.1 (OGLETREE)

Case 2:09-cv-11614-SFC-MJH ECF No. 18-2, PageID.269 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 1