alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16927]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP96-591-000]


Algonquin Gas Transmission; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

June 27, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 21, 1996, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin), 1284 Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts 
02135, filed in Docket No. CP96-591-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the National 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for authorization to construct and 
operate a tap valve interconnecting its existing T-system in Milford, 
Massachusetts with facilities constructed by Ball-Foster Glass 
Container Co., L.L.C. (Ball-Foster), under the blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP87-317-000, all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Algonquin states that the proposed delivery facilities will consist 
of a tap, meter and related data acquisition system facilities which 
will be installed by Algonquin within the existing right-of-way. 
Algonquin notes that Ball-Foster will construct a regulator station and 
miscellaneous piping on land it owns in Milford, which is adjacent to 
Algonquin's right-of-way. Algonquin asserts that the proposed addition 
of the proposed facilities will have no impact on its system-wide peak 
day deliveries because the deliveries to Ball-Foster will be 
interruptible, pursuant to Algonquin's Rate Schedule AIT-1. Algonquin 
estimates the cost of facilities to be constructed by Algonquin will be 
$81.450. Ball-Foster has agreed to reimburse Algonquin for constructing 
these facilities. Algonquin notes that Ball-Foster will pay for 
facilities it will construct.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16927 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of ONELIFE  HEALTH  PRODUCTS INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007,  as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Dan
McFarland,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Dan McFarland
                                        -----------------------------------
Date: October 15, 2007                  Dan McFarland
                                        Chief Executive Officer
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 118 Filed 11/02/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 7200
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4081 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4081

 To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is 
 operating to submit to the Congress a plan and cost estimate for the 
   engineering, design, and retrofitting of the icebreaker MACKINAW.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 1996

   Mr. Oberstar (for himself, Mr. Obey, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Dingell, Mr. 
 Visclosky, Mr. LaTourette, Mr. Hoke, Mr. LaFalce, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. 
  Stupak, Ms. Kaptur, and Mr. Brown of Ohio) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is 
 operating to submit to the Congress a plan and cost estimate for the 
   engineering, design, and retrofitting of the icebreaker MACKINAW.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLAN FOR THE ENGINEERING, DESIGN, AND RETROFITTING OF THE 
              ICEBREAKER MACKINAW.

    (a) In General.--Not later than May 1, 1997, the Secretary of the 
department in which the Coast Guard is operating shall submit to the 
Committees a plan and cost estimate for the engineering, design, and 
retrofitting of the icebreaker MACKINAW (WAGB-83) to equip the vessel 
with new engines, command and control features, habitability 
improvements, and other features needed to allow operation of the 
vessel by a significantly reduced crew, including 24-hour continuous 
operation when necessary.
    (b) Committees Defined.--In subsection (a), the term ``Committees'' 
means the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House 
of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

I, Calli R. Bucci, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2019, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

*/s/ Calli R. Bucci*

Calli R. Bucci

Chief Financial Officer

 

October 22, 2019

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jill THOMPSON and Mark Thompson, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Jerry KLENKE, et al., Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Richard JACKMAN and Betty Jo Jackman, Third Party Defendants/Appellants.

No. 69145.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Dec. 31, 1996.

Sally Austin Mills, G. William Wynne, Clayton, for appellants.

Robert E. Jones, Catherine M. Vale, Clayton, for respondents.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this quiet title action, plaintiffs and third party defendants appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants. The trial court quieted title by establishing the “Elbring line” as the dividing line.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Computation Of Per Share Earnings

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings 
per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128:


                                               Years ended December 31,
                                                 1998     1997     1996   


Numerator:
   Net income (loss)                      $(6,022,207)  $3,025,524  $(1,868,027)

Denominator:
   Basic earnings per share:
   Weighted average shares outstanding      7,761,224    7,675,220    5,781,853 

   Effect of dilutive securities - stock 
      options and warrants                          -      442,702            - 

   Denominator for diluted earnings per 
      share                                 7,761,224    8,117,922    5,781,853 

   Net income (loss) per common
      share - basic                         $   (0.78)   $    0.39    $  (0.32)
   Net income (loss) per common
      share - diluted                       $   (0.78)   $    0.37    $  (0.32)


The effect of dilutive securities of 490,909, 40,967 and 513,194 for the years 
ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 were not included in the calculation of 
diluted net loss per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
**EXHIBIT32.0**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersignedexecutive officer of Trans World Corporation (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Date:    March 11, 2008 | /s/  Rami S. Ramadan                            |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Name: Rami S. Ramadan                           |
|                                   | Title:  President, Chief Executive Officer, and |
|                                   | Chief  Financial Officer                        |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4074 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4074

  To require that jewelry imported from another country be indelibly 
                   marked with the country of origin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 1996

   Mr. Reed introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require that jewelry imported from another country be indelibly 
                   marked with the country of origin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF IMPORTED JEWELRY.

    (a) Marking Requirement.--By no later than the date that is 1 year 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
Treasury shall prescribe and implement regulations that require that 
all jewelry described in subsection (b) that enters the customs 
territory of the United States have the English name of the country of 
origin indelibly marked in a conspicuous place on such jewelry by 
cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping, or some other permanent 
method. The exceptions from marking requirements provided in section 
304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) shall not apply to 
jewelry subject to this section.
    (b) Jewelry.--The jewelry referred to in subsection (a) is any 
article described in heading 7113 or 7117 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    As used in this Act, the term ``enters the customs territory of the 
United States'' means enters, or is withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, in the customs territory of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CONSO PRODUCTS COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 27, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                       2,332,987
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,107,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,352,246
<INVENTORY>                                 30,358,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,623,531
<PP&E>                                      40,360,549
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,599,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             115,692,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,626,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,618,732
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,471,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               115,692,305
<SALES>                                     71,860,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            71,860,661
<CGS>                                       46,591,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,591,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,336,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             608,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,323,714
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,291,704
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,032,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,032,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MERCEDES CARDONA, 

 Appellant,

v.

HARTS HOMESTEAD, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00060-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2010-J00112) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed. Because Appellant has not filed a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution.

On May 31, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that her brief was past due

and that no motion for extension of time had been received. The Clerk also informed the parties

of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the

notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. To this date, no one has

responded to the Clerk’s letter.

This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the

appellants fail to file a brief in the time prescribed and give no reasonable explanation for the

failure to do so. TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63

(Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of
-2-

prosecution.

July 13, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350     I, Tony N. Frudakis, President and Treasurer of Skyview Holdings Corp. (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:  1.  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.   Skyview Holdings Corp.Date: April 1, 2011By:/s/ Tony N. FrudakisTony N. FrudakisPresident and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 4, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00216

- CV

L. C. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUST ICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the decree terminating parental rights signed by the tr i a l court on

November 3, 2020

. Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over

the appeal

. Therefore, the C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of ju risdi ction

. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                             5
<CIK>                                                        0000914670
<NAME>                                Correctional Services Corporation


<S>                                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                        7,070,000
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                37,148,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  1,380,000
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             49,244,000
<PP&E>                                                       47,972,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                4,912,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              111,198,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        26,963,000
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                        114,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                   32,183,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                111,198,000
<SALES>                                                     233,918,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            233,918,000
<CGS>                                                       206,839,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               206,839,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             28,270,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           (3,069,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (4,260,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (253,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (4,513,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 985,000
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (3,528,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    ($0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    ($0.31)


</TABLE>
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3887

To repeal the provision of chapter 83 of title 5, United States Code, under

which certain Members of Congress are eligible for immediate retirement

after serving in 9 Congresses.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 1996

Mr. GEJDENSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To repeal the provision of chapter 83 of title 5, United

States Code, under which certain Members of Congress

are eligible for immediate retirement after serving in

9 Congresses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Repeal of the 9-Term

5 Clause Act’’.
2

•HR 3887 IH

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The last sentence of subsection

3 (g) of section 8336 of title 5, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; and

6 (2) by striking ‘‘or (2) serving in 9 Con7 gresses’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend9 ments made by this section—

10 (1) shall take effect at the beginning of the

11 105th Congress; and

12 (2) shall apply with respect to separations oc13 curring during the 105th Congress or later.

Æ