45074 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Notices 

consent order, settlement agreement, or 

undisputed Commission determination 

of non-infringement. The five remaining 

respondents are: (1) Collective; (2) 

Double Diamond; (3) Effervescent; (4) 

Gen-X Sports; and (5) Holey Soles. 

On April 11, 2008, the ALJ issued his 

final ID finding no violation of section 

337 by the remaining respondents. The 

Commission extended the deadline for 

determining whether to review the final 

ID until June 18, 2008. 

On June 18, 2008, the Commission 

determined to review-in-part the final 

ID. Particularly, the Commission 

determined to review: (1) The ALJ’s 

findings concerning non-infringement of 

the ‘789 patent by the respondents’

products and lack of satisfaction of the 

technical prong of the domestic industry 

requirement by Crocs’ footwear; and (2) 

the ALJ’s finding of invalidity with 

respect to the ‘858 patent. 

Having reviewed the record in this 

investigation, including the final ID and 

the parties’ briefing, the Commission 

has determined to modify and clarify 

parts of the final ID concerning noninfringement and lack of satisfaction of 

the technical prong of the domestic 

industry requirement relating to the ‘789 

patent and invalidity of the ‘858 patent. 

The Commission affirms the final ID 

with the modifications and 

clarifications set forth in its separately 

issued Opinion, and terminates the 

investigation with a finding of no 

violation of section 337. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 

210.45 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.45. 

Issued: July 25, 2008. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–17665 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–611] 

In the Matter of Certain Magnifying 

Loupe Products and Components 

Thereof; Notice of Commission 

Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order 

Against the Infringing Products of 

Respondent Found in Default; 

Termination of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has issued a limited 

exclusion order against the infringing 

products of a respondent found in 

default, and has terminated the abovecaptioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jonathan J. Engler, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3112. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was initiated on August 1, 

2007, based on a complaint filed by 

General Scientific Corporation (‘‘GSC’’) 

of Ann Arbor, Michigan. 72 FR 42111 

(Aug. 1, 2007). The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337), as 

amended, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain magnifying 

loupe products and components thereof 

by reason of infringement of claim 8 of 

U.S. Patent No. 5,446,507, claim 1 of 

U.S. Patent No. 6,513,929, or claims 1–

5 or 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,704,141. The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. The complainant requested that the 

Commission issue an exclusion order 

and cease and desist orders. The 

complaint named SheerVision, Inc. 

(‘‘SheerVision’’), of Rolling Hills Estates, 

California, as well as Nanjing JinJiahe 

I/E Co. (‘‘Nanjing’’), of Jiangsu, China, as 

respondents. 

On January 28, 2008, GSC and 

respondent SheerVision jointly moved 

to terminate this investigation with 

respect to SheerVision based on a 

settlement agreement and a proposed 

consent order. On February 8, 2008, the 

ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 8) granting 

the motion to terminate. The 

Commission determined not to review 

the ID. 

On March 10, 2008, GSC filed a 

motion requesting an order directing 

respondent Nanjing to show cause why 

it should not be found in default for 

failure to respond to the complaint and 

Notice of Investigation. On March 21, 

2008, the ALJ issued Order No. 9, which 

ordered Nanjing to show cause by April 

4, 2008 why it should not be found in 

default. No response to Order No. 9 was 

filed. On April 25, 2008, the ALJ issued 

an ID, Order No. 10, finding Nanjing in 

default. The Commission determined 

not to review that ID. Because Nanjing 

was found to be in default, the 

Commission issued notice of its 

consideration of a default remedy, and 

requested briefing from interested 

parties on remedy, the public interest, 

and bonding on May 16, 2008. 

The Commission investigative 

attorney and GSC submitted briefing 

responsive to the Commission’s request 

on May 30 and May 29, 2008, 

respectively, and each proposed a 

limited exclusion order directed to 

Nanjing’s accused products, and 

recommended allowing entry under 

bond of 100 percent of entered value 

during the period of Presidential review. 

The Commission found that each of 

the statutory requirements of section 

337(g)(1)(A)–(E), 19 U.S.C. 

1337(g)(1)(A)–(E), has been met with 

respect to the defaulting respondents. 

Accordingly, pursuant to section 

337(g)(1), 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1), and 

Commission rule 210.16(c), 19 CFR 

210.16(c), the Commission presumed 

the facts alleged in the complaint to be 

true. 

The Commission has determined that 

the appropriate form of relief in this 

investigation is a limited exclusion 

order prohibiting the unlicensed entry 

of certain magnifying loupe products 

and components thereof, by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claim 8 

of U.S. Patent No. 5,446,507, claim 1 of 

U.S. Patent No. 6,513,929, and claims 1–

5 and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 6,704,141 

that are manufactured abroad by or on 

behalf of, or imported by or on behalf 

of, Nanjing JinJiahe I/E Co. of Jiangsu, 

China, or any of its affiliated companies, 

parents, subsidiaries, or other related 

business entities, or any of their 

successors or assigns. The Commission 

further determined that the public 

interest factors enumerated in section 

337(g)(1), 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1), do not 

preclude issuance of the limited 

exclusion order. Finally, the 

Commission determined that the bond 

under the limited exclusion order 

during the Presidential review period 

shall be in the amount of 100 percent of 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 149 / Friday, August 1, 2008 / Notices 45075 

1The record is defined in section 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

the entered value of the imported 

articles. The Commission’s order was 

delivered to the President and the 

United States Trade Representative on 

the day of its issuance. 

The Commission has terminated this 

investigation. The authority for the 

Commission’s determination is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1337), and sections 210.16(c) and 210.41 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (19 CFR 210.16(c) and 

§ 210.41). 

Issued: July 24, 2008. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E8–17662 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–990 (Review)] 

Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings 

From China 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (Commission) determines, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on non-malleable cast iron pipe 

fittings from China would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on March 3, 2008 (73 FR 11440) 

and determined on June 6, 2008 that it 

would conduct an expedited review (73 

FR 34325, June 17, 2008). 

The Commission transmitted its 

determination in this review to the 

Secretary of Commerce on July 24, 2008. 

The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4023 

(July 2008), entitled Non-Malleable Cast 

Iron Pipe Fittings from China: 

Investigation No. 731–TA–990 (Review). 

Issued: July 24, 2008. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E8–17664 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[USITC SE–08–021] 

Government in the Sunshine Act 

Meeting Notice 

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United 

States International Trade Commission. 

TIME AND DATE: August 7, 2008 at 11 

a.m. 

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 

(202) 205–2000. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Agenda for future meetings: None. 

2. Minutes. 

3. Ratification List. 

4. Inv. Nos. 701–TA–457 and 731–

TA–1153 (Preliminary) (Certain TowBehind Lawn Groomers and Parts 

Thereof from China)—briefing and vote. 

(The Commission is currently scheduled 

to transmit its determinations to the 

Secretary of Commerce on or before 

August 8, 2008; Commissioners’

opinions are currently scheduled to be 

transmitted to the Secretary of 

Commerce on or before August 15, 

2008.) 

5. Outstanding action jackets: None. 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: July 29, 2008. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. E8–17754 Filed 7–31–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Proposed Information Collection 

Request for Wagner-Peyser Act of 

1933, as Amended by the Workforce 

Investment Act of 1998, Funded Public 

Labor Exchange and Veterans’

Employment and Training Service 

Funded Labor Exchange (OMB Control 

Number 1205–0240): Comment 

Request for Extension Without 

Changes 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor, as 

part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the general public 

and federal agencies with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and/or continuing collections of 

information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)]. This 

program helps to ensure that requested 

data can be provided in the desired 

format, reporting burden (time and 

financial resources) is minimized, 

collection instruments are clearly 

understood, and the impact of collection 

requirements on respondents can be 

properly assessed. Currently, the 

Employment and Training 

Administration is soliciting comments 

concerning the collection of data about 

the Wagner-Peyser Act of 1933, as 

amended by the Workforce Investment 

Act of 1998, Funded Public Labor 

Exchange and Veterans’ Employment 

and Training Service Funded Labor 

Exchange. 

A copy of the proposed information 

collection request (ICR) can be obtained 

by contacting the office listed below in 

the ADDRESSES section of this notice or 

by accessing: http://www.doleta.gov/ 

OMBCN/OMBControlNumber.cfm. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office listed in the 

ADDRESSES section below on or before 

September 30, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments 

to Karen A. Staha, Performance and 

Technology Office, Employment and 

Training Administration, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Room S–5206, 

Washington, DC 20210. Telephone 

number: 202–693–3420 (this is not a 

toll-free number). Fax: 202–693–3490. 

E-mail: ETAPerforms@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

States submit quarterly performance 

data for the Wagner-Peyser funded 

public labor exchange services through 

ETA 9002 reports and for Veterans’

Employment and Training Services 

(VETS)-funded labor exchange services 

through VETS 200 reports. The 

Employment and Training (ET) 

Handbook No. 406 contains the report 

forms and provides instructions for 

completing these reports. The ET 

Handbook No. 406 contains a total of 

eight reports (ETA 9002, A, B, C, D, E$; 

VETS 200 A, B, C). The ETA 9002 and 

VETS 200 reports collect data on 

individuals who receive core 

employment and workforce information 

services through the public labor 

exchange and VETS-funded labor 

exchange of the states’ One-Stop 

delivery systems. The Employment and 

Training Administration is proposing 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES