alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3831

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that the primary duty

of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration is to enhance

the safety and security of the commercial civil aviation industry.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 1996

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. COSTELLO) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that the

primary duty of the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration is to enhance the safety and security

of the commercial civil aviation industry.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aviation Safety Prior5 ity Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3831 IH

1 SEC. 2. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR AVIATION PRO2 GRAMS.

3 (a) SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS IN PUBLIC INTER4 EST.—Section 40101(d) of title 49, United States Code,

5 is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘its develop7 ment and’’;

8 (2) by striking paragraph (2); and

9 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (3) through

10 (6) as paragraphs (2) through (5), respectively.

11 (b) PRIMACY OF SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS.—Section

12 40101 of such title is amended by adding at the end the

13 following:

14 ‘‘(g) PRIMACY OF SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS.—Not15 withstanding any other provision of this title, the Adminis16 trator shall give primary consideration to the safety and

17 security of the commercial civil aviation industry in all

18 matters, and shall seek to enhance the safety and security

19 of the industry in all actions.’’.

20 SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF FAA DUTY TO ENCOURAGE DEVEL21 OPMENT OF CIVIL AERONAUTICS AND AIR

22 COMMERCE.

23 (a) REPEAL.—Section 40104 of title 49, United

24 States Code, is repealed.
3

•HR 3831 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec2 tions for chapter 401 of such title is amended by striking

3 the item relating to section 40104.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-20143, Form S-3 No. 333-55916, Form S-8 No. 333-3310 and Form
S-8 No. 333-42735) of Jameson Inns, Inc. of our reports dated February 8, 2001,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule III of
Jameson Inns, Inc. and March 8, 2001 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Jameson Hospitality, LLC included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Jameson Inns, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
April 2, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICK T. FIELDS,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-12181

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

v.

 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff filed suit pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.§ 552 et seq.,

seeking his late father’s tax returns. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge R. Steve

Whalen for all pretrial proceedings. See, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); (Doc. 7).

On February 25, 2011, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) and dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint with prejudice.

(Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the Report and

Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of service and that a party’s failure to

file objections would waive any further right of appeal. See (Doc. 25 at 4); 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to

review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation,

GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss, and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint with

prejudice. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2:09-cv-12181-MOB-RSW Doc # 28 Filed 03/25/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 111
2

 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: March 25, 2011

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were mailed to Plaintiff and counsel of record on this date by

ordinary mail and electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt 

Case Manager 

2:09-cv-12181-MOB-RSW Doc # 28 Filed 03/25/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 112
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3996 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3996

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish false statements 
        during debate on the floor of either House of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mrs. Myrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish false statements 
        during debate on the floor of either House of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Integrity in Congress Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. FALSE STATEMENTS DURING CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1035. False statements during Congressional debate
    ``Whoever, being a Senator or Representative, knowingly makes any 
false statement during any speech or debate in either House of Congress 
shall be fined not more than $10,000.''.
    (b)  Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``1035. False statements during Congressional debate.''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING SUSPENSION OF FLOOR PRIVILEGES.

    It is the sense of Congress that any Senator or Representative who 
knowingly or willfully makes any false statement during any speech or 
debate in either House of Congress should be prohibited from 
participating in any speech or debate in Congress for a 60-day period.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anoteros, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George G. Chachas, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ George G. Chachas By: George G. Chachas Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: April 29, 2009  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-10 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 1418
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-10 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 1419
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-10 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 1420
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-10 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 1421
Exhibit 10.5







SECOND AMENDMENT


OF


OTTER TAIL CORPORATION


DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS


(2003 Restatement)


 


The “OTTER TAIL CORPORATION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS” established as of November 1, 1983, by the Board of Directors of OTTER TAIL CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, as amended and restated in a document entitled “Otter Tail Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (2003 Restatement) (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan Statement”), as amended, is hereby further amended in the following respects:


 


1. ADMINISTRATION. Effective as of the date the shareholders approve the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, Section 6(e) of the Plan Statement and Section 6(e) of Appendix A is amended by replacing “Otter Tail Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan” with “Otter Tail Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan.”


 


2. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan Statement shall continue in full force and effect.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, Criminal No. 09-CR-20177 

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN 

DEANDRE JAMES, 

Defendant. 

______________________________/ 

ORDER TRANSFERRING DEFENDANT=S MOTION TO VACATE HIS SENTENCE 

TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Defendant has filed a one-page letter in which he inquires about the possibility of relief 

under United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019), and the appointment of Aa lawyer to look over my 

case@ if this relief is available [docket entry 26]. The government has filed a response opposing relief on 

this basis and the appointment of counsel. In his reply, defendant states that he Ais seeking relief in the 

form of a correction, or [vacation] of [his] sentence to correct manifest injustice@ [docket entry 29]. The 

Court therefore treats defendant=s filings as a motion to vacate his sentence and for the appointment of 

counsel. The instant motion appears to be a second or successive 28 U.S.C. ' 2255 motion, the first such 

motion having been filed on June 17, 2016 [docket entry 21]. A second or successive ' 2255 motion 

Amust be certified as provided in section 2244 by a panel of the appropriate court of appeals . . . .@ 

Section 2255. When, as in this case, a second or successive ' 2255 motion is filed without the required 

certification, the district court is required to transfer the motion to the court of appeals. See In re 

Hanserd, 123 F.3d 922, 934 (6th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that defendant=s motion to vacate his sentence and for the appointment 

of counsel is hereby transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. 

 s/Bernard A. Friedman 

Dated: September 13, 2019

 Detroit, Michigan 

Bernard A. Friedman 

Senior United States District Judge 
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of 

record herein by electronic means or first-class U.S. mail on September 13, 2019. 

Deandre James, 43555039 

Pollock U.S. Penitentiary 

Inmate Mail/Parcels 

P.O. Box 2099 

Pollock, LA 71467 

S/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams 

Case Manager
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JASON TROWBRIDGE, 

Petitioner, CASE NO. 09-10974

 HONORABLE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

v. 

GINO ROMANO, et al., 

Respondents.

______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On March 16, 2009, petitioner Jason Trowbridge filed a pro se petition for the writ

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because he failed to pay the filing fee for his

habeas petition or to apply for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court ordered

him on March 26, 2009, to pay the filing fee of $5.00 within twenty-one days or to submit

a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court warned Petitioner that

failure to comply with the Court’s order could result in a dismissal of the habeas petition. 

To date, Petitioner has not paid the filing fee for this action, submitted an

application to proceed in forma pauperis, or communicated with the Court. Accordingly,

the habeas petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to

comply with the Court’s previous order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 41.2 (E.D.

Mich. Mar. 2, 1998). 

 ___ s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

Dated: June 5, 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-10974-MOB-PJK Doc # 3 Filed 06/05/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the above date a copy of this Order was served upon the

petitioner and respondent.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10974-MOB-PJK Doc # 3 Filed 06/05/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 5
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.];(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Michael LeslerExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 39
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3796

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for research to determine

the extent to which the presence of dioxin in tampons poses any health

risks to women.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1996

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. FOGLIETTA, Mr. FROST, Mr. JACOBS, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of

Texas, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. TRAFICANT, and

Mr. YATES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for

research to determine the extent to which the presence

of dioxin in tampons poses any health risks to women.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Health and

5 Dioxin Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3796 IH

1 SEC. 2. OFFICE OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN’S HEALTH; ES2 TABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM FOR RESEARCH

3 REGARDING PRESENCE OF DIOXIN IN TAM4 PONS.

5 Part F of title IV of the Public Health Service Act

6 (42 U.S.C. 287d et seq.) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following section:

8 ‘‘SEC. 486C. CERTAIN PROJECTS REGARDING WOMEN’S

9 HEALTH.

10 ‘‘The Director of NIH, in collaboration with the Di11 rector of the Office, shall provide for the conduct or sup12 port of research to determine the extent to which the pres13 ence of dioxin in tampons poses any health risks to

14 women, including risks relating to cervical cancer.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 12.1
 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Year Ended December 31,2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Pretax income from continuing operations
before adjustment for noncontrolling interest
    
    $
    18,245
    
    
    $
    68,222
    
    
    $
    34,998
    
    
    $
    48,229
    
    
    $
    53,513AdjustmentsEquity in income in unconsolidated joint ventures
    
    
    116
    
    
    
    88
    
    
    
    (108
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (204
    )Fixed Charges
    
    
    82,090
    
    
    
    76,400
    
    
    
    65,413
    
    
    
    71,985
    
    
    
    62,846Distributed income of equity investees
    
    
    346
    
    
    
    371
    
    
    
    171
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3,308Capitalized interest
    
    
    (2,244
    )
    
    
    (1,430
    )
    
    
    (2,934
    )
    
    
    (3,194
    )
    
    
    (5,820
    )Earnings as Defined
    
    $
    98,553
    
    
    $
    143,651
    
    
    $
    97,540
    
    
    $
    117,020
    
    
    $
    113,643Fixed ChargesInterest expense
    
    $
    75,104
    
    
    $
    71,229
    
    
    $
    62,752
    
    
    $
    69,209
    
    
    $
    58,812Capitalized interest
    
    
    2,244
    
    
    
    1,430
    
    
    
    2,934
    
    
    
    3,194
    
    
    
    5,820Amortization (accretion) of debt discounts (premiums), net
    
    
    2,818
    
    
    
    2,221
    
    
    
    (1,902
    )
    
    
    (2,102
    )
    
    
    (3,289
    )Amortization of loan fees
    
    
    1,924
    
    
    
    1,520
    
    
    
    1,629
    
    
    
    1,684
    
    
    
    1,503Fixed Charges
    
    $
    82,090
    
    
    $
    76,400
    
    
    $
    65,413
    
    
    $
    71,985
    
    
    $
    62,846Ratio of earning to Fixed Charges
    
    
    1.20
    
    
    
    1.88
    
    
    
    1.49
    
    
    
    1.63
    
    
    
    1.81
 - 120 -
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4051

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for Managed

Health Services of Wisconsin.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 11, 1996

Mr. KLECZKA (for himself and Mr. KLUG) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition

rule for Managed Health Services of Wisconsin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT

4 RULE FOR MANAGED HEALTH SERVICES OF

5 WISCONSIN.

6 The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the

7 Social Security Act is waived with respect to Managed

8 Health Services of Wisconsin, for contract periods through

9 December 31, 1999.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

PETER DEMCHENKO,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CITY OF PHILADELPHIA),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 500 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of January, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joseph R. GARNER, Appellant. Joseph R. GARNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49494, WD 51073.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 9, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for Respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Consolidated appeals from conviction and 30 year sentence without possibility of probation or parole, as a “prior drug offender,” § 195.295 RSMo. Supp.1991, for trafficking drugs in the second degree, § 195.223 RSMo. Supp.1991, following a jury trial and the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion.

Judgments affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-188107 on Form F-3 of Gazit-Globe Ltd. and in the related Prospectus of our
report dated March 15, 2012 relating to the 2011 consolidated financial statements (before retrospective adjustments discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements) of First Capital Realty Inc. (not presented herein), appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gazit-Globe Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2013. 
 /s/ Deloitte LLP 

Chartered Professional Accountants, Chartered Accountants 

Licensed Public Accountants 
 Toronto, Canada 

April 16, 2014
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No.  333-67083)  pertaining  to The Bibb Company  1997  Omnibus  Stock
Incentive  Plan,  Dan River Inc.  Amended and Restated  Stock  Option  Plan,  as
Amended,  Dan River Inc. 1997 Stock  Incentive  Plan,  Dan River Inc. 1997 Stock
Plan for Outside Directors,  the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-36542)
pertaining to the 2000 Long-term  Incentive Plan and the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-52458)  pertaining to the Dan River Inc.  Nonqualified  401(k)
and Deferred Compensation Plan for Highly Compensated Employees and Directors of
our report dated March 15,  2002,  with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and schedule of Dan River Inc.  included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 29, 2001.




                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Greensboro, North Carolina
March 20, 2002
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James KELLEY, Jr., Appellant.

Nos. WD 50248, WD 51969.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 18, 1997.

Lew Kollias, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and LAURA DENVIR STITH and HOWARD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated appeal from conviction of one count of selling a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 1991, and from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).