alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.4

                                   EXHIBIT "C"

                             RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY
                              BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                           PENTEGRA DENTAL GROUP, INC.
                            AT SPECIAL CALLED MEETING
                                 ON JUNE 7, 2000

                              AMENDMENT OF BYLAWS
                    REMOVAL OF MAJORITY DENTIST REQUIREMENT

     WHEREAS,  the current  Bylaws require that a majority of the members of the
Board of Directors be dentists  affiliated with dental practices of the Company;
and

     WHEREAS,  the Directors have reviewed and discussed the new requirements of
the American Stock Exchange and more importantly the recent changes  promulgated
by AMEX and the Securities and Exchange  Commission  related to the  requirement
that  a  certain   number  of  the   Directors   of  the  Company  have  certain
qualifications and independence; and,

     WHEREAS, the Company's management and Board believe that the requirement of
a majority of dentists on the Board no longer suites the needs of the Company;

IT IS THEREFORE,

     RESOLVED,  in accordance  with Article 7, Section 11 (Amendment of Bylaws),
that Article Three,  Section 2 (Directors  Qualification,  Election and Term) of
the  Corporation's  Bylaws shall be amended and restated so that it reads in its
entirety as follows:

     "SECTION 2. QUALIFICATION;  ELECTION; TERM. None of the Directors need be a
     stockholder of the Corporation or a resident of the State of Delaware.  The
     Directors  shall be  classified,  with  respect  to the time for which they
     severally  hold office,  into three classes (Class A, Class B and Class C),
     as nearly  equal in  number  as  possible,  as  determined  by the Board of
     Directors,  one class to hold office  initially  for a term expiring at the
     Annual Meeting of  stockholders  to be held in 1998,  another class to hold
     office  initially for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting of stockholders
     to be held in 1999 and another  class to hold office for a term expiring at
     the Annual Meeting of stockholders to be held in 2000, with members of each
     Class to hold office until  whichever of the following  occurs  first:  his
     successor  is elected and  qualified,  his  resignation,  his removal  from
     office  by the  stockholders  or his  death.  At  each  Annual  Meeting  of
     stockholders of the  Corporation,  the successors to the Class of Directors
     whose term  expires at the  meeting  shall be elected to hold  office for a
     term expiring at the Annual Meeting of stockholders  held in the third year
     following  the year of their  election.  Directors  shall be  elected  by a
     plurality of the votes of the shares  present in person or  represented  by
     proxy and  entitled to vote on the  election of  Directors at any annual or
     special meeting of stockholders. Such election shall be by written ballot."
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 12, 2022 No. 04-22-00349-CV Scott Ralph WHEELOCK aka Scott Wheelock, et al., Appellant

v. KERR COUNTY , Headwaters Groudwater Conservation District, Kerr County Emergency Services District #2, Kerr County Lateral Roads, Upper Guadalupe River Authority, Harper Independent School District, Appellees From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21317A Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief was due on August 24, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. We therefore ORDER appellant to file, by September 29, 2022 : (1) his brief; and (2) a written response reasonably explaining: (a) his failure to timely file a brief; and (b) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a); see also T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order).

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

EXECUTION COPY 
 April 7, 2014 

Mr. David G. Ellen 
 Cablevision Systems Corporation

 1111 Stewart Avenue 
 Bethpage, New York 11714 

 

	 	Re:	Employment Agreement 

 Dear David: 

This letter will confirm the agreement of Cablevision Systems Corporation (the “Company”) and you to make certain amendments
to your existing employment agreement, dated as of February 1, 2012, between you and the Company as amended to date (the “Existing Employment Agreement”). 

1. Section 1 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby modified to reflect your current title of “Executive Vice President,
General Counsel & Secretary”. 
 2. Section 2 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby modified to $1,200,000
annually, subject to annual review and potential increase by the Compensation Committee (as defined in the Existing Employment Agreement). 

3. Section 6 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby modified to change the Scheduled Expiration Date to December 31, 2018.

 4. Section 10 of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby modified to replace section 1(B) of the definition of “Good
Reason” to read as follows: “your title (as in effect from time to time) is diminished; provided, however, that the removal of your title as Secretary will not be a diminishment of your title so long as the remainder of your title is not
diminished and so long as the employee who then holds the Secretary title reports to you,”. 
 5. Section 23 of the Existing
Employment Agreement is modified to replace “December 31, 2016” with “the Scheduled Expiration Date”. 
 6. The Existing
Employment Agreement together with this letter agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within that state. 

If the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding, kindly execute a counterpart of this letter in the place provided below whereupon
this letter shall become a binding agreement between you and the undersigned. 







 
			
	CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
	
	/s/ James L. Dolan
	By:	 	James L. Dolan
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer


  

	
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	/s/ David G. Ellen
	David G. Ellen
#### James WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52471.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Rebecca L. Kurz, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and SPINDEN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

James Wilson appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM Doc # 2720 Filed 09/02/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 19638
FIRST AMENDMENT TO


DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT PLAN OF


AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL NEW YORK RECOVERY
REIT, INC.


 


WHEREAS, American Realty Capital New
York Recovery REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Distribution Reinvestment Plan of American Realty
Capital New York Recovery REIT, Inc. (the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 11 of
the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) may at any time amend the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend
the Plan as set forth herein;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section
11 of the Plan, effective as of March 31, 2014, Sections 11(b) and 11(c) of the Plan are hereby amended in their entirety to read
as follows:


 


“(b) The Administrator may terminate
a Participant’s individual participation in the Plan and the Company may terminate the Plan itself, at any time by providing
ten (10) days’ prior written notice to a Participant, or to all Participants, as the case may be. The Administrator may suspend
a Participant’s individual participation in the Plan and the Company may suspend the Plan itself, at any time.


 


(c) After termination or suspension of the
Plan or termination or suspension of a Participant’s participation in the Plan, the Administrator will send to each Participant
a check for the amount of any Distributions in the Participant’s account that have not been invested in Shares. Any future
Distributions with respect to such former Participant’s Shares made after the effective date of the termination or suspension
of the Participant’s participation will be sent directly to the former Participant.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has approved
the amendment to the Plan as set forth herein and authorized the undersigned officer of the Company to execute this amendment and
the undersigned has caused this amendment to be executed this 31st day of March, 2014.


 


	 	AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL NEW YORK RECOVERY REIT, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Name: Nicholas S. Schorsch
	 	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer and
	 	 	Chairman of the Board of Directors
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTEMES, SA, 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Claim Defendant, 

 Case No. 09-cv-10534 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

KEITH CHILDRESS, 

 Defendant/Counter-Claim Plaintiff. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE 

RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION 

On June 16, 2022, Plaintiff Dassault Systemes, SA and Defendant Keith 

Childress each filed motions for summary judgment in this action. (See Dassault 

Mot., ECF No. 581; Childress Mot., ECF No. 582.) The Court then issued a written 

order in which it (1) granted in part and denied in part Dassault’s motion and (2) 

denied Childress’ motion. (See Order, ECF No. 597.) 

 Both parties have now filed motions for reconsideration. (See Dassault Mot. 

for Reconsideration, ECF No. 607; Childress Mot. for Reconsideration, ECF No. 

608.) The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the motions and concludes 

that it would benefit from a full set of briefing from both parties. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 610, PageID.22521 Filed 08/02/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

 Each party shall file a response to their opponent’s motion for 

reconsideration by no later than August 23, 2023; and 

 Each party shall file a reply brief in support of their motion for 

reconsideration by no later than September 8, 2023. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: August 2, 2023 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on August 2, 2023, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 610, PageID.22522 Filed 08/02/23 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion
in this Form 10-K of our report dated September 19, 1996 (except with respect to
the matter discussed in the seventh paragraph of Note 5, as to which the date is
June 27, 1997), with respect to the consolidated statements of operations,
redeemable common stock and stockholders' equity and cash flows of Randall's
Food Markets, Inc. and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended June 29, 1996, and
to all references to our firm included in this Registration Statement. It should
be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the Company
subsequent to June 29, 1996 or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the
date of our report.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Houston, Texas
September 14, 1998
IB

Union Calendar No. 398

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3871

[Report No. 104–752]

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for certain

health maintenance organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 23, 1996

Mr. TOWNS (for himself, Mr. GREENWOOD, and Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Commerce

AUGUST 2, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition

rule for certain health maintenance organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3871 RH

1 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT

2 RULE FOR CERTAIN MANAGED CARE ORGANI3 ZATIONS.

4 The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the

5 Social Security Act is waived—

6 (1) with respect to Catholic Health Services

7 Plan of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. (doing business

8 as Fidelis Health Plan) and Managed Healthcare

9 Systems of New York, Inc., for contract periods

10 through January 1, 1999, and

11 (2) with respect to Health Partners of Philadel12 phia, Inc., for contract periods through December

13 31, 1999.

Union Calendar No. 398

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3871

[Report No. 104–752]

A BILL

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment comnizations. position rule for certain health maintenance orgaAUGUST 2, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
V

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 410

For the relief of the estate of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. DICKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the estate of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF CLAIM.

4 The Secretary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any

5 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to the

6 estate of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr., the sum of $608,715.40.

7 The payment required by this section shall be in full satis8 faction of all claims that the estate or family of Wallace

9 B. Sawyer, Jr., may have against the United States aris10 ing from the death of Wallace B. Sawyer, Jr., following

11 an October 5, 1986, missile attack on the airplane in
2

•HR 410 IH

1 which he was a crewmember performing services for and

2 at the direction of the United States.

3 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

4 It shall be unlawful for an amount exceeding 10 per5 cent of the payment required by section 1 to be paid to

6 or received by any agent or attorney for any service ren7 dered in connection with the payment. Any person or es8 tate violating this section shall be guilty of an infraction,

9 and shall be subject to a fine in the amount provided in

10 title 18, United States Code.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff, Cr. No. 2:09-cr-20070

v.

HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN

JEFF GARVIN SMITH,

 Defendant.

 /

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DELETE SURPLUSAGE 

“FAT DOG” FROM THE INDICTMENT

For the reasons stated from the bench at the hearing held on August 19, 2009.

SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 21, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail

on August 21, 2009.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:09-cr-20070-PDB-PJK Doc # 27 Filed 08/21/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 96
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

We, Steven J. Goldman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Eddie K. Schnopp, Senior Vice PresidentFinance, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of Power-One, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:



Date:
March 17, 2005

/s/STEVEN J. GOLDMAN

---

Steven J. Goldman Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/EDDIE K. SCHNOPP

---

Eddie K. Schnopp Senior Vice PresidentFinance, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.12


                                                @Entertainment Inc.
                                                One Commercial Plaza 24th Floor
                                                Hartford CT 06103

                         PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
                      EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 1999


March 1, 1999


Mr. Przemyslaw Szmyt
Ul. Orzechowa # 3
05-B30 Nadarzyn
POLAND



Dear Przemyslaw:

As agreed, below please find amendments to the agreement signed between you 
and Poland Communications, Inc. on February 7, 1997 (as subsequently amended 
and assigned to @Entertainment, Inc.).


Section 1A. shall read as follows:

     Your engagement with the Company shall be for a five- (5) year period,
     commencing February 7, 1997.


Section 1B. shall read as follows:

     You shall hold the position of Senior Vice President Business Development
     and General Counsel.


Section 1D. shall read as follows:

     You shall be eligible to receive an annual bonus, at the discretion of 
     the Chief Executive Officer.


Section 11A, second sentence, shall read as follows:

     The Company may terminate this Agreement upon six (6) months notice at
     any time during the term.


The foregoing amendments are effective as of January 1, 1999.


Best regards,

By: /S/ ROBERT E. FOWLER, III
   --------------------------
Robert E. Fowler, III
Chief Executive Officer
cbmg_ex1028.htm


Exhibit 10.28


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 


12
Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
  Jurisdiction ofName
    
    IncorporationOKSB Statutory Trust I
    
    ConnecticutSBI Capital Trust II
    
    DelawareSouthwest Capital Trust II
    
    DelawareBusiness Consulting Group, Inc. (inactive)
    
    OklahomaBank of Kansas
    
    KansasQuad J Holdings, LLC*****
    
    KansasSNB Capital Corporation
    
    OklahomaStillwater National Bank & Trust Company
    
    United StatesCash Source, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaCRK Properties, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaSNB Real Estate Holdings, Inc. *
    
    DelawareStillwater National Building Corporation*
    
    OklahomaCRK Technologies, LLC **
    
    OklahomaCRK Stretford, LLC**
    
    OklahomaSNB REIT, Inc.***
    
    DelawareStillwater Properties, Inc.*
    
    OklahomaGrand Hill Investments, LLC****
    
    Oklahoma
 
 *
    
    Direct subsidiary of Stillwater National Bank & Trust Company.**
    
    Direct subsidiary of CRK Properties, Inc.***
    
    Direct subsidiary of SNB Real Estate Holdings, Inc.****
    
    Direct subsidiary of Stillwater Properties, Inc.*****
    
    Direct subsidiary of Bank of Kansas 105
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

WILLIAM BOND,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-CV-11699-DT

U.S. MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Before the court is Plaintiff William Bond’s January 27, 2010 “Application for

Appointment of Counsel Financial Affidavit.” The court discussed the application during

the February 18, 2010 telephone conference, which was conducted on the record. 

The court will deny the application. There is no constitutional right to appointed

counsel in a civil case, Childs v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382 (6th Cir. 1987) and, as a

general rule, counsel will only be appointed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) in exceptional

circumstances, Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). Here, the

court does not find exceptional circumstances warranting appointment. Moreover,

unlike in criminal cases, the court does not have at its disposal a roster of attorneys who

the court can “appoint” to represent a civil party. At the most, the court could only

request an attorney under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) to represent Plaintiff at no cost. The

court is not persuaded that such a request is merited in this case, and Plaintiff’s

application to appoint counsel will thus be denied.
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-11699.BOND.DenyApplicationAppointCounsel.wpd

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s January 27, 2010 “Application for

Appointment of Counsel Financial Affidavit” [Dkt. # 33] is DENIED. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DIS-TRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 18, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, February 18, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522
================================================================================

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                 CERTIFICATION
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, David Roff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


      Dated: November 2, 2010

      /s/ "David Roff"


      David Roff
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------