alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

         In connection with the Annual Report of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
R. Howell IV, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2003               By  /s/ Charles R. Howell IV
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Charles R. Howell IV
                                        Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT NO. 23.1







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of GS
Financial Products U.S., L.P. (the "Company") on Form S-3 (File No. 33-99948),
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 1, 1995, of our
report dated January 21, 1997 on our audits of the financial statements of GS
Financial Products U.S., L.P. as of November 24, 1995 and November 29, 1996 and
for the fiscal years ended November 25, 1994, November 24, 1995, and November
29, 1996, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                               COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



New York, New York
February 27, 1997.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934**

 

I, DonR. Kania, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of FEI Company;and

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: March 14, 2008             |             |
|---------------------------------------|------------------|
|                                  |             |
| By:                                   | /s/ DON R. KANIA |   |
| Don R. Kania                          |             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |             |
|                                       |                  |  |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    The accompanying Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: April 10, 2007
    /s/  JEFFREY S. OLSONJeffrey S. OlsonPresident and Chief Executive
Officer Date: April 10, 2007
    /s/  GREGORY R. ANDREWSGregory R. AndrewsExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

David Grabowski, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 09-10503

Citibank Corporation, et al., Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This action was removed to this Court on February 10, 2009. 

A routine review of the docket revealed that no summons has been returned executed as

to Defendant Citibank Corporation, although the time for service under FED. P. CIV. P. 4(m) has

expired. Accordingly, on June 24, 2009, this Court issued an “Order Directing Plaintiff to Show

Cause,” requiring Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, no later than July 6, 2009, why this case

should not be dismissed for failure to effect timely service of process as to Defendant Citibank

Corporation. (Docket Entry No. 5).

Plaintiffs did not file any response that Order.

Pursuant to this Court’s June 24, 2009 Order Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause, and

pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Citibank Corporation is

hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: August 4, 2009

2:09-cv-10503-SFC-RSW Doc # 6 Filed 08/04/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 119
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

David Grabowski, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 09-10503

Citibank Corporation, et al., Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

on August 4, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10503-SFC-RSW Doc # 6 Filed 08/04/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 120
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 

Power of Attorney 
 CHEN Haozhi, LIU
Guanqun and MA Fei (the “Principals”) hold 100% equity interests of Beijing Wan’ai Internet Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), of which 45%m 45% and 10% is respectively held by CHEN Haozhi, LIU Guanqun and
MA Fei. The Principals agree to authorize Beijing Chukong Aipu Technology Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE” or the “Attorney”) to exercise the right of shareholders corresponding to their holding of equity interests in the
Company, and hereby irrevocably authorize the WFOE to exercise the rights as follows during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 The Principals authorize
the WFOE to exercise, on behalf of the Principals as holders of 100% equity interests of the Company, all rights of shareholder entitled to the Principals by law and under the Articles of the Company, including without limitation the right to call
for shareholder’s meeting, accept any notice regarding the convention of shareholder’s meeting and meeting agenda, attend shareholder’s meeting and exercise all voting rights as holders of 100% equity interests of the Company
(including acting as the proxy of the Principals to nominate and appoint the director, general manager, financial controller or other senior management of the Company, decide dividend distribution and any other matter), and to sell or transfer all
equity interests of the Company held by the Principals. 
 The Attorney may designate any individual appointed by its board of directors to exercise any of
the rights authorized by the Principals under this Agreement. 
 Unless the Business Operations Agreement jointly made by the Company, the Attorney and the
Principals is early terminated for any reason, this Power of Attorney will have a term as long as the term of the Business Operations Agreement commencing on the date hereof. Upon expiry hereof and at request of the WFOE, the Attorney will extend
the term hereof of validity hereof as requested by the WFOE. 
  

			
	Principals
	
	CHEN Haozhi
		
	By:	 	/s/ CHEN Haozhi
	
	LIU Guanqun
		
	By:	 	/s/ LIU Guanqun
	
	MA Fei
		
	By:	 	/s/ MA Fei

  

			
	Attorney:	 	Beijing Chukong Aipu Technology Co., Ltd. (company seal)
	By:	 	CHEN Haozhi
		 	Legal Representative
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JACQUELYN BEAMON, 

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-11727

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

OPINION AND ORDER

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District 

of Michigan, on January 13, 2010.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

The United States filed this action to recover student loan proceeds on May 5, 2009.

On June 4, 2009, the Court entered default judgment against Defendant. On July 31, 2009,

the Clerk of the Court issued a writ of continuing garnishment as to Defendant and garnishee

Michigan Department of Treasury. On August 25, 2009, Defendant requested a hearing on

the request for the writ of garnishment, which this Court referred to Magistrate Judge

Virginia M. Morgan.

On November 4, 2009, Magistrate Judge Morgan conducted a hearing regarding

Defendant’s objections to the writ of garnishment. On November 18, 2009, Magistrate Judge

Morgan filed her Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court deny

2:09-cv-11727-PJD-VMM Doc # 20 Filed 01/13/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 77
1

Since the issuance of Magistrate Judge Morgan’s R&R, the time for objecting to R&Rs

has been extended to 14 days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Both the 10 and 14 day periods for

objection have expired in this case.

2

Defendant’s objections to the writ of garnishment. At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate

Judge Morgan advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within

ten days of service upon them.1

 (R&R at 3-4.) She further specifically advises the parties

that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal.”

( Id. at 4.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R.

The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached

by Magistrate Judge Morgan.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s objections to the writ of garnishment are DENIED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Jacquelyn Beamon

15423 Oakfield St.

Detroit, MI 48227

Pamela Ritter, Esq.

2:09-cv-11727-PJD-VMM Doc # 20 Filed 01/13/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 78
NUMBER 13-22-00164-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

EX PARTE MAUREEN MARTINEZ

On appeal from the 156th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant Maureen Martinez filed a notice of appeal from an order denying her 

application for writ of habeas corpus. On August 12, 2022, we abated the appeal and 

remanded the case to the trial court to resolve a conflict between the record and the trial 

court’s certification of Martinez’s right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). However, 

on August 22, 2022, Martinez filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion was filed 

before we reached a decision in the case, and the motion was signed by both Martinez 

and her attorney. See id. R. 42.2(a). Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant 
2

Martinez’s motion to dismiss, and dismiss the appeal. See id. Having dismissed the 

appeal at Martinez’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed on the

22nd day of September, 2022.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC., 

a Michigan corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS, INC., 

a Delaware corporation,

Defendant.

 /

CASE NO. 09-10756

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS CONNEXUS, FIRSTLOOK AND 

NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS, INC.’S MOTION TO STRIKE 

REPORT OF CHRISTOPHER SCHWERZLER AND PROHIBIT HIS 

TESTIMONY ON SAME AT TRIAL AND GRANTING DEFENDANT 

EPIC MEDIA GROUP INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's to Strike Report of Christopher

Schwerzler and Prohibit his Testimony on Same at Trial (Doc. No. 202), and Defendants

Epic Media Group Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 178). For the reasons

stated on the record at a hearing held September 15, 2011, the motions are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the status conference scheduled for September 26,

2011, is CANCELLED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date: September 21, 2011

2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 222 Filed 09/21/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 5978
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were mailed and/or electronically filed to counsel of record on

this date.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 222 Filed 09/21/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 5979
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Home
Buy & Sell Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel L. Baxter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ 
      Daniel L. BaxterDaniel
      L. Baxter
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                April
      8, 2008
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-188107) of Gazit Globe Ltd. and in the related Prospectus of our
reports dated March 25, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Gazit Globe Ltd. and subsidiaries included
in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2013. 
  

							
		 		 		 	/s/ Kost Forer Gabby & Kasierer
	Tel-Aviv, Israel	 		 		 	 KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER

	April 16, 2014	 		 		 	 A Member of Ernst & Young Global
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial statements contained in the body of the Form 10-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1000


<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        40,897
<SECURITIES>                  9,305
<RECEIVABLES>                 14,133
<ALLOWANCES>                  (267)
<INVENTORY>                   7,351
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              72,484
<PP&E>                        2,376
<DEPRECIATION>                (1,177)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                73,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         15,044
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      141
<OTHER-SE>                    58,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  73,817
<SALES>                       70,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              70,344
<CGS>                         45,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 65,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               5,471
<INCOME-TAX>                  413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           5,058
<DISCONTINUED>                5,058
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  5,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 $.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                 $.42



</TABLE>
#### Kristian GIPPO, Appellant, v. Katherine F. WAINRIGHT, Respondent.

No. 68436.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Jan. 23, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 28, 1996.

Carl W. Becker, Ira M. Berkowitz, Lander & Berkowitz, Clayton, for appellant.

Donald O’Keefe, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snod-grass, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES RUSSELL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kristian Gippo, appeals from the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, granting respondent’s, Katherine F. Wainright’s, motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arkson Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Agatha Auduon, the Treasurer and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month
          period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Quarterly Report"), fully
          complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2007

                                      /s/ Agatha Auduon
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Agatha Auduon
                                      Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 2053

_____________________________
T YRONE R ONDELL J EFFERSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County

. James M. Colaw , Judge

. July 18, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , W INOKUR , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Wade Martin Rolle of Wade Rolle & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.45

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                          TO THE INTERIM SERVICES INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

         THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to the Interim Services Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is made on this 14th day of June, 1999, by
Interim Services Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company");

                              W I T N E S S E T H :

         WHEREAS, Article IX of the Plan provides that the Company has the right
to amend the Plan at any time; and

         WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan as embodied herein;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan hereby is amended, effective as of June 1,
1999, as follows:

         1.       By adding the following to the end of Plan Section 1.23:

                  "Effective June 1, 1999, any deemed investment in the Interim
                  Services Inc. Stock Fund will be transferred to the Deferred
                  Company Stock Unit Fund."

         2.       By adding the following to the end of Plan Section 4.2(e)(ii):

                  "Any deemed investment in the Interim Services Inc. Stock Fund
                  which is transferred to the Deferred Company Stock Unit Fund
                  as of June 1, 1999 shall, at all times after the transfer,
                  remain as a deemed investment in such latter fund, and
                  Participants shall not be permitted to direct investment from
                  the Deferred Company Stock Unit Fund to another investment
                  available under the Plan."

         3.       Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect as prior to this Second Amendment.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer
to execute this Second Amendment on the date first above written.

                                   INTERIM SERVICES INC.


                                   By: /s/ John B. Smith
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Title:  Senior Vice President & Secretary
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1186 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the in the 

home restriction for Medicare coverage of mobility devices for individuals 

with expected long-term needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. LIEBERMAN, and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the in the home restriction for Medicare coverage of 

mobility devices for individuals with expected long-term 

needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Independent 

5 Living Act of 2009’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1186 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF IN THE HOME RESTRICTION FOR 

2 MEDICARE COVERAGE OF MOBILITY DEVICES 

3 FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH EXPECTED LONG4 TERM NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting 

7 ‘‘or, in the case of a mobility device required by an indi8 vidual with expected long-term need, used in customary 

9 settings for the purpose of normal domestic, vocational, 

10 or community activities’’ after ‘‘1819(a)(1))’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to items furnished on or after 

13 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS