alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Cora I. Remsing,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-12258

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the

pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and any objections thereto, the Court hereby

ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is further

ordered that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, Defendant's motion for summary

judgment is GRANTED, the findings of the Commissioner are AFFIRMED, and the case is hereby

DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: March 24, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel

of record on March 24, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager
EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles R. Howell IV, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles R. Howell IV     
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Charles R. Howell IV         
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
2:09-mj-30133-DUTY Doc # 10 Filed 04/20/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 17
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3896

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of dogs or

other appropriate animals at major airports for the purpose of detecting

plastic explosives and other devices which may be used in airport piracy

and which cannot be detected by metal detectors.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 26, 1996

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use

of dogs or other appropriate animals at major airports

for the purpose of detecting plastic explosives and other

devices which may be used in airport piracy and which

cannot be detected by metal detectors.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aviation Security Im5 provement Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3896 IH

1 SEC. 2. SCREENING BY DOGS.

2 Section 44903(b) of title 49, United States Code, is

3 amended by adding at the end of the following new para4 graph:

5 ‘‘(3) USE OF DOGS IN SCREENING.—

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The law enforcement

7 presence and capability required under para8 graph (1) shall include a requirement that the

9 operator of each major airport use dogs or

10 other appropriate animals in screening pas11 sengers and cargo for the purpose of detecting

12 plastic explosives and other devices or materials

13 which may be used in aircraft piracy and which

14 cannot be detected by metal detectors.

15 ‘‘(B) MAJOR AIRPORT DEFINED.—In this

16 paragraph, the term ‘major airport’ means an

17 airport that is one of the largest 50 airports in

18 the United States, as determined by the num19 ber of passenger enplanements in calendar year

20 1995.’’.

21 SEC. 3. EXPLOSIVE DETECTION K–9 TEAMS.

22 Section 44913(b) of title 49, United States Code, is

23 amended to read as follows:

24 ‘‘(b) EXPLOSIVE DETECTION K–9 TEAMS.—

25 ‘‘(1) GRANTS.—The Secretary shall make

26 grants for expenses of training and evaluation of
3

•HR 3896 IH

1 dogs for the explosive detection K–9 team training

2 program for the purpose of detecting explosives at

3 airports and aboard aircraft. Not later than 180

4 days after the date of the enactment of the Aviation

5 Security Improvement Act of 1996, the Secretary

6 shall extend such program to the largest 50 airports

7 in the United States, as determined by the number

8 of passenger enplanements in calendar year 1995.

9 ‘‘(2) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be ap10 propriated from the Trust Fund for carrying out

11 paragraph (1) such sums as may be necessary for

12 fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996.

13 Such funds shall remain available until expended.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36051-36052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-517-000]


Algonquin LNG, Inc.; Notice of Public Scoping Meeting and Site 
Inspection, Algonquin LNG Modifications Project

July 2, 1996.
    On July 15, 1996, at 7:00 p.m., the Office of Pipeline Regulation 
environmental staff will conduct a public scoping meeting for the 
facilities proposed in the Algonquin LNG Modification's Project in 
Providence, Rhode Island. The meeting will be held at the Rhode Island 
Public Utilities Commission, Third Floor Hearing Room, 100 Orange 
Street, Providence, Rhode Island.
    The public meeting will be designed to give more detailed 
information and

[[Page 36052]]

another opportunity to offer comments on the proposed project. Those 
wanting to speak at the meeting can call the Environmental Assessment 
(EA) Project Manager to preregister their names on the speaker list. 
Individuals on the speaker list before the date of the meeting will be 
allowed to speak first. A second speaker list will be developed at the 
meeting. Priority will be given to people representing groups. A 
transcript of each meeting will be made so that your comments will be 
accurately recorded.
    In addition to the public meeting, the environmental staff will 
inspect the proposed project sites on the afternoon of July 15, 1996. 
Those planning to attend must provide their own transportation. For 
further information, call Chris Zerby, EA Project Manager, at (202) 
208-0111.
Kevin P. Madden,
Director, Office of Pipeline Regulation.
[FR Doc. 96-17408 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4054 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4054

 To provide relief to agricultural producers who granted easements to, 
 or owned or operated land condemned by, the Secretary of the Army for 
   flooding losses caused by water retention at the dam site at Lake 
    Redrock, Iowa, to the extent that the actual losses exceed the 
          estimates of the Secretary, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 1996

Mr. Lightfoot introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide relief to agricultural producers who granted easements to, 
 or owned or operated land condemned by, the Secretary of the Army for 
   flooding losses caused by water retention at the dam site at Lake 
    Redrock, Iowa, to the extent that the actual losses exceed the 
          estimates of the Secretary, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS FOR FLOODING LOSS CAUSED BY 
              DAM ON LAKE REDROCK, IOWA.

    (a) Eligibility.--To be eligible for assistance under this section, 
an agricultural producer must--
            (1)(A) be an owner or operator of land who granted an 
        easement to the Federal Government for flooding losses to the 
        land caused by water retention at the dam site at Lake Redrock, 
        Iowa; or
            (B) have been an owner or operator of land that was 
        condemned by the Federal Government because of flooding of the 
        land caused by water retention at the dam site at Lake Redrock, 
        Iowa; and
            (2) have incurred losses that exceed the estimates of the 
        Secretary of the Army provided to the producer as part of the 
        granting of the easement or as part of the condemnation.
    (b) Compensation.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of 
        the Army shall compensate an eligible producer described in 
        subsection (a) for flooding losses to the land of the producer 
        described in subsection (a)(2) in an amount determined by the 
        Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
            (2) Reduction.--The amount of compensation provided to a 
        producer under paragraph (1) shall be reduced by--
                    (A) in the case of land located on a 10-year flood 
                plain, 10 percent of the amount otherwise determined 
                under paragraph (1); and
                    (B) in the case of land located on a 25-year flood 
                plain, 4 percent of the amount otherwise determined 
                under paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.17



 EXHIBIT 4.17 
 (English Summary) 
 LEASE 

Parties: 
 SOUTHERN
TAIWAN SCIENCE PARK ADMINISTRATION (the “Lessor”) 
 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED (the
“Lessee”) 
 Lease Premises: 
 The government-owned land containing 250 square meters, located in Southern Taiwan Science Park (formerly Tainan Science Park) at partial areas in and around Huanxi Road. 

Lease Term: 
 Commencing
December 15, 2006 and expiring on December 31, 2024. 
 Rental: 

The total amount of monthly rental shall be three thousand three hundred eighty-six New Taiwan Dollars (NT$3,386). 

After the commencement of this Lease, the Lessee shall pay the rental amount of NT$3,386 including applicable taxes, each month in the
manner prescribed by the Lessor. 
 If Lessee, with Lessor’s consent, uses the land before the execution date of this Lease,
the above-mentioned rental should be calculated from the starting date of use. 
 If Lessee fails to make monthly rental
according to the agreed schedule and Lessor’s procedures for payment, certain punitive fine may apply according to the Lease. 
 Lessee shall adhere to rules and regulations concerning construction of overpass and provide such overpass for public use. 
 Lessee must adhere to the term and condition set forth under this Lease concerning the use of the Lease Premises. 
 During the term of the Lease, should the position or measured area of Lessee’s overpass changes, the Lease Premises shall adjust in accordance with any such change. 

Any changes to the existing road use in and around Huanxi Road shall only be permitted with the consent of the Lessor. 







 Termination by Lessor: 
 Lessor may terminate the lease at any time if any of the following shall happen: 
  

	 	a.	Lessee is disqualified from operating or providing service in the park and ordered by the Lessor to withdraw from the Southern Taiwan Science Park;


  

	 	b.	Lessee violates any term or provision of this Lease pertaining to the use of the land and fails to provide remedy after receiving Lessor’s written notice within
limited time; 

  

	 	c.	Lessee violates the term and provision pertaining to the restrictions on sub-leasing; 


 

	 	d.	Lessee has defaulted in the payment of rent for two or more years. 

 The Lessor can terminate this Lease with cause at any time, and Lessee shall unconditionally surrender the lease premises one month after receiving Lessor’s written notice; the Lessor shall return
any excess payment to the Lessee in such early termination. 
 Miscellaneous: 

The Lease term shall automatically expire unless Lessor and Lessee renew this Lease. 

This Lease shall be effective from the execution date of the Lease, however, if the Lessee uses the land before the execution date of this
Lease, the Lease shall be effective from the date when the Lessor consent to Lessee’s use of the land. 
 Should any suits
arise from this Lease, Lessor and Lessee agree that the governing law shall be the laws of Republic of China and the Taiwan Tainan District Court shall be the competent court of jurisdiction in the first instance.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Victor M. Garcia, Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



/s/    VICTOR M. GARCIAVictor M. GarciaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 20, 2009 | /s/ Qingqing Wu                    |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Qingqing      Wu                   |   |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
|                    | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CLIFTON E JACKSON and 

CHRISTOPHER M SCHARNITZKE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-11529

Honorable David M. Lawson

v. 

SEGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, INC., COCA COLA 

ENTERPRISES, INC., and PAUL 

DROUILLARD,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

On July 17, 2009, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.

Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(a) provides:

(1) The movant must ascertain whether the contemplated motion, or request under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), will be opposed. If the movant obtains

concurrence, the parties may make the subject matter of the contemplated motion or

request a matter of record by stipulated order.

(2) If concurrence is not obtained, the motion or request must state:

(A) there was a conference between attorneys or unrepresented

parties in which the movant explained the nature of the motion or

request and its legal basis and requested but did not obtain

concurrence in the relief sought; or

(B) despite reasonable efforts specified in the motion or request, the

movant was unable to conduct a conference.

E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a). 

2:09-cv-11529-NGE-VMM Doc # 27 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 402
-2-

In their motion, the plaintiffs certify that they “faxed to defense counsel a request that each

of them stipulate to the relief requested, or initiate a conference as required by LR7.1.” Mot. at 16.

Placing the onus on the non-moving party to contact the movant if the motion is opposed does not

constitute a reasonable effort to conduct a conference. Motions to amend are routine motions that

can usually be resolved without taxing the resources of the Court. Rather than undertake reasonable

efforts to work with defense counsel, the plaintiffs ask the Court for action. “It is not up to the Court

to expend its energies when the parties have not sufficiently expended their own.” Hasbro, Inc. v.

Serafino, 168 F.R.D. 99, 101 (D. Mass. 1996). The plaintiffs have filed their motion in violation of

the local rules.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion to amend [dkt. #26] is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 22, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 22, 2009.

s/Lisa M. Ware 

LISA M. WARE

2:09-cv-11529-NGE-VMM Doc # 27 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 403
#### Eugene GREGORY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70168.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1997.

Application to Transfer Denied March 25, 1997.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. LaHue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been fur*393nished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          62,463
<SECURITIES>                                    34,346
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                       270
<INVENTORY>                                     15,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,943
<PP&E>                                          26,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,433
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     201,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,433
<SALES>                                         93,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,130
<CGS>                                           40,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,918
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,958
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,958
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
Order entered November 4, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01398-CR

No. 05-12-01687-CR

DARIUS EDWARDS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-51415

ORDER

The Court DENIES as moot appellant’s October 31, 2013 motion to extend time to file 

his briefs. On the Court’s own motion, we ordered the briefs filed on November 1, 2013.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securitiesand Exchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Albert F. Buzzetti     Albert F. Buzzetti    President and Chief Executive Officer         Michael Lesler     Michael Lesler    Executive Vice President    and Chief Financial Officer       June 28, 2007