alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISON 

___________________________________ 

RAYMOND M. PFEIL AND MICHAEL 

KAMMER, Individually and on Behalf 

of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No. 2:09-cv-12229 

Plaintiffs, 

 Honorable Denise Page Hood 

vs. 

 CLASS ACTION 

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST 

COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

___________________________________ 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs and Class Representatives Raymond Pfeil, Michael 

Kammer, Andrew Genova, Richard Wilmot, Jr. and Donald Secen, hereby appeal to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from: (1) the final judgment in favor of the 

Defendant and against Plaintiffs entered in this action on April 11, 2014 (Docket No. 157); (2) 

the opinion and order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying 

Plaintiffs’ sealed motion for summary judgment entered in this action on April 11, 2014 (Docket 

No. 156); and (3) the order regarding various non-dispositive motions entered in this action on 

March 31, 2014 (Docket No. 155). 

2:09-cv-12229-DPH-MJH Doc # 158 Filed 04/16/14 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 6480
Dated: April 16, 2014 SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP 

 /s/ Geoffrey M. Johnson 

 GEOFFREY M. JOHNSON 

 12434 Cedar Road, Suite 12 

 Cleveland Heights, OH 44106 

 Telephone: (216) 229-6088 

 Facsimile: (216) 229-6092 

 gjohnson@scott-scott.com 

DEBORAH CLARK-WEINTRAUB 

 THOMAS L. LAUGHLIN IV 

 SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP 

The Chrysler Building 

 405 Lexington Avenue, 40th Floor 

 New York, NY 10174 

 Telephone: (212) 223-6444 

 Facsimile: (212) 223-6334 

 dweintraub@scott-scott.com 

 tlaughlin@scott-scott.com 

DAVID R. SCOTT 

STEPHEN TETI 

SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP 

156 S. Main Street 

P.O. Box 192 

Colchester, CT 06415 

Telephone: (860) 537-5537 

Facsimile: (860) 537-4432 

david.scott@scott-scott.com 

steti@scott-scott.com 

 Counsel for Plaintiffs

ELWOOD S. SIMON (P20499) 

 JOHN P. ZUCCARINI (P41646) 

 ELWOOD S. SIMON & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

 21 East Long Lake Road, Suite 520 

 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

 Telephone: (248) 646-9730 

 Facsimile: (248) 258-2335 

Local Counsel for Plaintiffs

2:09-cv-12229-DPH-MJH Doc # 158 Filed 04/16/14 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 6481
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that, on this 16th day of April, 2014, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was served via ECF on counsel for Defendant. 

/s/ Geoffrey M. Johnson 

 GEOFFREY M. JOHNSON 

 SCOTT+SCOTT, Attorneys at Law, LLP 

 12434 Cedar Road, Suite 12 

 Cleveland Heights, OH 44106 

 Telephone: (216) 229-6088 

 Facsimile: (216) 229-6092 

 gjohnson@scott-scott.com 

2:09-cv-12229-DPH-MJH Doc # 158 Filed 04/16/14 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 6482
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3834

AN ACT

To redesignate the Dunning Post Office in Chicago,

Illinois, as the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3834

AN ACT

To redesignate the Dunning Post Office in Chicago, Illinois,

as the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3834 EH

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

2 The Dunning Post Office, located at 6441 West Ir3 ving Park Road, Chicago, Illinois, shall be redesignated

4 and known as the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

8 States Post Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

9 to be a reference to the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROADSHIPS HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Micheal Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Micheal Nugent


Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 20, 2012
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 PHC, Inc.
 Peabody, MA.
 
 We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-2246, 333-41494, 333-76137, 333-117146 and 333-141431) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-123842 and  333-149579) of PHC, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated August 18, 2011, relating to the consolidated  financial statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 
 /s/  BDO USA, LLP
 Boston, MA
 August 18, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Pamela Jean Riley,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-12720

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the

pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and any objections thereto, the Court

hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is

further ordered that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, Defendant's motion for

summary judgment is GRANTED, the findings of the Commissioner are affirmed, and the case

is hereby DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: September 15, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on September 15, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2:09-cv-10881

)

v. ) Judge George Caram Steeh

)

RONALD S. BARCZYK, ET AL., ) Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen

)

Defendants. )

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT

This matter comes before the Court on the defendant Deborah A. Barczyk’s motion to set

aside the entry of default against her (Docket Entry No. 12). This motion being unopposed and

the Court having found good cause to set aside the default, the defendant’s motion is

GRANTED. Therefore, it is hereby— 

ORDERED, DECREED, and ADJUDICATED that the entry of default against Deborah

A. Barczyk is set aside and the she shall have 10 days from the entry of this order to answer or

otherwise respond to the United States’ complaint. 

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.

Dated: September 21, 2009

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 21, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10881-GCS-RSW Doc # 18 Filed 09/21/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 80
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3980

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act

of 1996 relating to the exclusion from the United States of certain aliens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity

(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 relating to the exclusion from

the United States of certain aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 401(a)(4) of the Cuban Liberty and Demo4 cratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C.

5 6091(a)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘a spouse, minor

6 child, or agent’’ and inserting ‘‘an agent’’.

Æ
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Willie PHILLIPS, Appellant. Willie PHILLIPS, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 67589, 70158.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Feb. 4, 1997.

John M. Schilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Lisa A. Fischer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and GRIMM and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Willie Phillips, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a *311jury of voluntary manslaughter, § 565.023 RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1986. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior, persistent and dangerous offender under § 558.016 RSMo Cum.Supp.1992, to thirty years imprisonment for voluntary manslaughter and a consecutive term of seventy-five years imprisonment for armed criminal action.

On appeal, Defendant asserts the trial court plainly erred in allowing the prosecuting attorney to comment on Defendant’s failure to testify and post-arrest silence. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears.

Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. In this regard, Defendant alleges the motion court erred in not finding Defendant’s trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to the prosecuting attorney’s references to Defendant’s failure to testify at trial.

Our review of the motion court’s ruling is limited to a determination of whether the motion court’s findings, conclusions and judgment are clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); *Moore v. State,*827 S.W.2d 213, 215 (Mo. banc 1992). We find the trial court’s findings of fact on Defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion are not clearly erroneous.

Regarding these judgments, an extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. Judgments affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
#### In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Wilmot H. SCOTT. Stephen SCOTT, David Scott, Vitro Products, Inc., and Honorable Robert O. Snyder, Personal Representative of The Estate of Wilmot H. Scott, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Abigail C. SCOTT, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69816.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 17, 1996.

Fairfax Jones and Terry Lueckenhoff, Casserly, Jones, Brittingham & Edwards, P.C., St. Louis, J. Peter Schmitz, Schmitz, Kopman, Schreiber & Kaveney, P.C., Clayton, for appellants.

Edward M. Roth, Leritz, Plunkert & Brun-ing, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Stephen Scott, David Scott, Vitro Products Inc., and Honorable Robert 0. Snyder, appeal from an order of the St. Louis County Circuit Court Probate Division directing the Personal Representative of the Estate of Wilmot Harry Scott, decedent, to take possession of real property and to pay rents therefrom to Abigail C. Scott, widow of decedent.

We affirm the order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
#### Omarr MILLETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 70255.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 7, 1997.

Richard H. Sindel, Sindel & Sindel, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa A. Fischer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Omarr Millett, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the decision of the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LINDON DEDVUKAJ and KATHY

DEDVUKAJ,

Plaintiffs,

v.

ERIC HOLDER, JR., Attorney General;

JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security;

MICHAEL YATES, Deputy Director U.S.

Citizenship and Immigration Services; W.

RALPH BASHAM, Commissioner of U.S.

Customs and Border Patrol; JOHN P.

TORRES, Asst. Secretary of U.S.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement;

MICK DEDVUKAJ, District Director of

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,

Detroit, Michigan,

Defendants,

 /

Case No. 09-11538

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

On April 24, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive

Relief against Defendants, challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s charge

against Lindon Dedvukaj, when he first arrived at the United States border in October

2000, of being an alien who falsely represented himself to be a citizen of the United

States for any purpose or benefit under the Immigration and Nationality Act or any other

Federal law or statute pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 212(a)(6)(C)(ii). Defendants filed a motion

to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which this Court granted in an Opinion

2:09-cv-11538-PJD-VMM Doc # 10 Filed 01/21/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 87
2

and Order entered on this date.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Plaintiffs’ Amended

Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DATE: January 21, 2010 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Melanie D. Goldberg, Esq.

Derri T. Thomas, AUSA

2:09-cv-11538-PJD-VMM Doc # 10 Filed 01/21/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 88
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3933 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3933

 To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air 
   and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International 
                    Airport, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 1996

 Mr. Wolf (for himself, Mr. Livingston, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
Davis, Mr. Bliley, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Moran, Mr. Payne of Virginia, Mr. 
    Boucher, Mr. Pickett, Mr. Sisisky, Mr. Bateman, and Mr. Scott) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air 
   and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International 
                    Airport, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF MUSEUM CENTER.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to construct the Smithsonian Institution National Air and Space Museum 
Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International Airport.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    No appropriated funds may be used to pay any expense of the 
construction authorized by section 1.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council for Biomedical 
Imaging and Bioengineering; NACBIB September 2008.
    Date: September 16, 2008.
    Open: 9 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Report from the Institute Director, other Institute 
staff and presentations of working group reports.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Closed: 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Anthony Demsey, PhD, Director, National 
Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6701 Democracy 
Blvd., Room 241, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nibib1.nih.gov/about/NACBIB/NACBIB.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-17586 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-20006-05-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

JOSEPH JONES,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNTS TWO AND TWENTY-NINE, AND

TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on September 21, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on

September 22, 2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s guilty plea. As of today’s

date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The

failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith

v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure

to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review

the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court, however, agrees with the findings

and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 116] is ADOPTED.

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 138, PageID.407 Filed 11/04/09 Page 1 of 2
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea as to counts two and twenty-nine

is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 105] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 4, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 4, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 138, PageID.408 Filed 11/04/09 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Western Graphite
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Seyit
Kucuk, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2013                         By: /s/ Seyit Kucuk
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Seyit Kucuk
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J.DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 09-12054

TIMOTHY PAUL BENNETT,

Petitioner,

-vMICHAEL W. CURLEY,

Respondent,

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This Court having entered an Order to Show Cause and counsel for petitioner 

having satisfied such order ; therefore

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s Order to Show Cause dated June 17,

2009 is hereby SET ASIDE. 

s/PATRICK J.DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: June 23, 2009

TO: 

Sanford Schulman

Timothy Bennett, #618833

Ojibway Correctional Facility

N. 5705 Ojibway Road

Marenisco, MI 49947-9771

2:09-cv-12054-PJD-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 62