alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  

**Certification Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906****of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vitaly Melnikov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1       

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: */s/ Vitaly Melnikov*Vitaly MelnikovChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting OfficerOctober 20, 2010                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04-17-00379-CV

IN RE TEXAS REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On January 24, 2018, this court conditionally granted relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus, and ordered the trial court to vacate its Order Granting Bill of Review and Injunctive 

Relief, and reinstate the July 31, 2013 default judgment. On March 1, 2018, we denied the real 

party in interest’s motion for rehearing.

On March 9, 2018, relator filed a “letter” with this court asking this court to issue a writ 

of mandamus to compel the trial court to comply with our January 24, 2018 opinion and order. 

On March 12, 2018, the trial court signed an order complying with our opinion and order. We 

therefore DENY relator’s request for a writ of mandamus AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on March 14, 2018.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, 

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016-CI-03723, styled Evan Jacobson v. Ben Luong, pending in the 45th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Stephani A. Walsh presiding.
INDEX OF EXHIBITS 

Exhibit Description

A Stipulated Order for Dismissal Without Prejudice 

B Arbitration Agreement 

C Partial Award Number One 

D Final Award 

E Arbitrator’s Opinion On Appeal 

F Proposed Final Judgment Confirming Arbitration Award 

Case 2:09-cv-11541-DPH-RSW ECF No. 17-1, PageID.64 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terrance Heard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/  Terrance HeardTerrance Heard
Principal Executive Officer
May 20, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 414 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 414

     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
            appropriate endorsement for the vessel REEL TOY.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Goss introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize issuance of a certificate of documentation with 
            appropriate endorsement for the vessel REEL TOY.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section 1. Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 
1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 
289), and sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States 
Code, as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for the vessel REEL TOY, United States official 
number 698383.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 9415]
RIN 1545-BB84


REMIC Residual Interests--Accounting for REMIC Net Income 
(Including Any Excess Inclusions) (Foreign Holders)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 
9415), that were published in the Federal Register on Monday, July 14, 
2008 (73 FR 40171). The final regulations relates to income that is 
associated with a residual interest in a Real Estate Mortgage 
Investment Conduit (REMIC) and that is allocated through certain 
entities to foreign persons who have invested in those entities.

DATES: This correction is effective on August 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arturo Estrada, (202) 622-3900 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9415) that is the subject of this 
correction is under section 1441 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, TD 9415 contains an error that may prove to be 
misleading and is in need of clarification.

List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Correction of Publication

0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION

0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *


0
Par. 2. Section 1.1441-2 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  1.1441-2  Amounts subject to withholding.

* * * * *
    (f) Effective/applicability date. This section applies to payments 
made after December 31, 2000. Paragraphs (b)(5) and (d)(4) of this 
section apply to payments made after August 1, 2006.

Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Senior Federal Register Liaison Officer, Publications and Regulations 
Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, (Procedure 
and Administration).
[FR Doc. E8-17954 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Donald R. McKelvey, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Skyview
Holdings Corp.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Dated: November 1, 2007                   By:   /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
       ----------------                         ----------------------
                                                Donald R. McKelvey
                                                Principal Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4083

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and

Conservation Act through September 30, 1997.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 4083 RDS

1 SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT

2 AMENDMENTS.

3 The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amend4 ed—

5 (1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246)

6 to read as follows:

7 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

8 ‘‘SEC. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated

9 for fiscal year 1997 such sums as may be necessary to

10 implement this part.’’;

11 (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking

12 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert13 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1997’’;

14 (3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42

15 U.S.C. 6276(h)) ‘‘There are authorized to be appro16 priated for fiscal year 1997 such sums as may be

17 necessary to carry out this part.’’; and

18 (4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking

19 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert20 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1997’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 24,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

WILLIAM BOND,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-CV-11699-DT

U.S. MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADJOURNING DEADLINES

On January 13, 2010, the court conducted a telephone conference, on the

record, regarding the impending deadlines in this matter. For the reasons stated on the

record, the court will allow Plaintiff an additional two weeks to obtain counsel and will

also adjourn the January 25, 2010 conference for about two weeks. As expressed in

the court’s December 11, 2009 order, after substitute counsel files an appearance, and

after the parties have had an opportunity to confer on the next stage of proceedings, the

court will conduct a status conference to set any deadlines on certain outstanding

issues, such as the filing of witness lists, an answer to the counterclaim, any dispositive

motions, possible motions for sanctions, or settlement documents. In the meantime, all

court-supervised proceedings--including any deadlines for filing answers, witness lists,

or motions--remain suspended. (See 12/11/09 Order at 2.) Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until February 1, 2010 to find substitute

counsel. Upon filing an appearance, substitute counsel is DIRECTED to contact

Defendant’s counsel to discuss the next stage of proceedings. If no attorney has filed

an appearance by February 1, 2010, Plaintiff shall be deemed to be proceeding pro se. 

2:09-cv-11699-RHC-MJH Doc # 32 Filed 01/15/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 810
1

In the event the court determines a status conference is unnecessary, the court

will issue a scheduling order in advance of the conference and cancel the conference. 

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-11699.BOND.AdjourningDates.wpd

2

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel, which includes Plaintiff only if he is

proceeding pro se, are DIRECTED to appear for a status conference on February 16,

2010 at 3:00 p.m. After the status conference, the court will issue an order setting forth

remaining deadlines.1 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DIS-TRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 15, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, January 15, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-11699-RHC-MJH Doc # 32 Filed 01/15/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 811
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:06−cr−20465−NGE−MKM

Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

Joseph Whiting, et al.,

Defendant(s),

NOTICE TO APPEAR

 The following defendant(s) are hereby notified to appear: Joseph Whiting

 The defendant(s) shall appear before District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds at the United

States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Boulevard, Room

858, Detroit, Michigan, for the following proceeding(s):

• SENTENCING: October 29, 2015 at 02:30 PM

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/C Bethel 

Case Manager

Dated: August 27, 2015

2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM Doc # 2719 Filed 08/27/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 19637
Exhibit 4.22


 


(Summary Translation)


 


	Loan agreement with Everbright Bank 
	Date of the Agreement	March 20, 2013
	Borrower (Party A)	Xinjiang Daqo New Energy Co., Ltd.
	Lender (Party B)	China Everbright Bank Chongqing Wanzhou Branch
	Use of loan	Working capital
	Principal	RMB 70 million
	Term of loan	From March 20, 2013 to March 20, 2014
	Grant of loan	Loan shall be granted at any time when necessary
	Interest rate	
        Fixed rate at 6.6% per year

         

        In the event of late repayment, a penalty interest rate
        of         the fixed rate provided hereof  plus 50% thereof will be imposed on the overdue loan until all principal and
        interest are               repaid.

         

        In the event of applying loans other than the usage
        provided         hereof, a penalty interest of the fixed rate provided hereof plus 100% thereof will be imposed until
        all         principal         and         interest are repaid.

         

        A compound interest will be imposed on any overdue interest.

	Interest settlement day 	Interest shall be settled on the 20th day of each month.
	Repayment	
        Repayment of principal and interest shall be fully made
        on         March 20, 2014

         

        Party B is entitled to deduct funds from Party A's accounts
        opened at China Everbright Bank for the repayment of any overdue loan.

	Guarantee	Joint and several liability guarantee provided by Daqo Group Co., Ltd. and Guangfu Xu
	Party A's covenants	
        Party A shall:

        1. Notify Party B in at least 30 days advance and obtain a written
        consent from Party B in respect of investment, substantially increase of debt financing, shareholding restructure, merger, joint
        venture, spin-off, asset transfer and other actions which will affect the interest of Party B, and shall fulfill its repayment
        obligations;

        2. Within the term of loan, without Party B's written
        consent, Party A shall not repay loans of any third party, provide any guarantee or set any mortgage or pledge over Party
        A's         asset or         interest which         would affect Party A's ability of repayment of the loan hereof;

        3. Other than specified above, notify Party B in written immediately
        in respect of any matter which may jeopardize Party A's normal operation or cause material adverse impact to its ability to its
        performance of this Agreement.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD L. VERTIN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

TERRY L. GODDARD, Former Attorney

General of the State of Arizona; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-15026

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-01167-GMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Ronald L. Vertin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations in

connection with the civil forfeiture of his property. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

NOV 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-15026

U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s dismissal

for failure to comply with a court order. Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640

(9th Cir. 2002). We reverse and remand.

The district court issued an order to show cause (“OSC”) as to why Vertin’s

action should not be dismissed for failure to serve defendants in a timely manner. 

Before the OSC deadline, Vertin filed service documents that he apparently

thought constituted a sufficient response. However, the district court dismissed for

failure to comply with the OSC without analysis, further opportunity to respond, or

exploration of less harsh alternatives. Under these circumstances, we conclude that

dismissal was an abuse of discretion. See id. at 642-43 & n.4 (listing factors to

consider before dismissing for failure to comply with a court order and explaining

that less drastic alternatives must be pursued after disobedience); Oliva v. Sullivan,

958 F.2d 272, 273 (9th Cir. 1992) (“Because dismissal is a harsh penalty, it should

be imposed as a sanction only in extreme circumstances.”). Accordingly, we

reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with our disposition. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3853

To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to prohibit the Authority from imposing a performance deposit on any person constructing

a dock or making any other residential shoreline alteration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 1996

Mr. HILLEARY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to

prohibit the Authority from imposing a performance deposit on any person constructing a dock or making any

other residential shoreline alteration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING PERFORMANCE

4 DEPOSIT.

5 The Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16

6 U.S.C. 832 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section

7 16 the following:
2

•HR 3853 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 17. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSING PERFORMANCE DE2 POSIT.

3 ‘‘The Corporation may not impose a performance de4 posit on any person constructing a dock or making any

5 other residential shoreline alteration.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

CAREER AGENTS NETWORK, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-CV-12269-DT

careeragentsnetwork.biz,

careeragentnetwork.biz,

LAWRENCE R. WHITE, and

AEROMEDIA MARKETING, INC.,

Defendants.

 /

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court’s February 26, 2010, “Opinion and Order Granting

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment,”

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of

Defendants careeragentsnetwork.biz, careeragentnetwork.biz, LAWRENCE R. WHITE,

and AEROMEDIA MARKETING, INC, and against Plaintiff Career Agents Network, Inc. 

Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 26th day of February, 2010.

 

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: S/Lisa Wagner 

Lisa Wagner, Deputy Clerk 

and Case Manager to

Judge Robert H. Cleland