alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                           1,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                       279
<INVENTORY>                                     58,166
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,770
<PP&E>                                         101,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,036
<BONDS>                                        157,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,159)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,093
<SALES>                                        177,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,148
<CGS>                                          119,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,828
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,037
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-81276 (1994 Stock Option Plan), 333-92143 (1999 Stock Option Plan), and
33-97850 (Employee Stock Purchase Plan), each on Form S-8, and Registration
Statement No. 33-94378 (Dividend Reinvestment Plan) on Form S-3, of our report
dated February 2, 2004, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Southwest Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2004
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zongshu Nie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 19, 2011
By:
/s/ Zongshu NieZongshu Nie

Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3900 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3900

  To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
             planting flexibility, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 1996

 Mr. Combest (for himself, Mr. Roberts, Mr. de la Garza, Mr. Stenholm, 
 Mr. Allard, Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. 
Lucas of Oklahoma, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Thornberry, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. 
   Tejeda) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater 
             planting flexibility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED PLANTING FLEXIBILITY.

    Section 118 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 
7218) is amended by adding the following new paragraph to subsection 
(b)(2):
            ``(D) by a producer on contract acreage following a crop 
        that fails due to conditions beyond the producer's control.''.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    Subsection 118(b)(2) is amended:
            (a) in paragraph (B), by striking ``or''; and
            (b) in clause (ii) of paragraph (C), by striking 
        ``vegetable.'' and inserting ``vegetable; or''.

SEC. 3. CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM REGULATIONS.

    Not later than September 15, 1996, the Secretary shall issue 
regulations to implement the Conservation Reserve Program (16 U.S.C. 
3831 et seq.), as amended by section 332 of the Federal Agriculture 
Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-127, April 4, 1996).
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WEDRIA LONG, #187751

Plaintiff,

v.

ANNAE SANDERS, et al.,

Defendants.

/

Case No. 09-11021

DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

ORDER

ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [51],

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART

 DEFENDANTS SANDERS, STOVALL-HILL AND MUZZIN’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [40],

and

DISMISSING DEFENDANTS SANDERS AND STOVALL-HILL

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [51], filed on June

17, 2010, regarding Defendants Sanders, Stovall-Hill and Muzzin’s Motion for Summary Judgment

[40]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ Motion be granted in part and denied in

part. The parties have filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. 

There having been no objections, the Court being fully advised in the premises, and for the

reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [51],

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [51] is ADOPTED.

Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion [40] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART,

as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion [40] is GRANTED as to the Fourteenth

Amendment Equal Protection claims stated against Defendants Sanders, Stovall-Hill and Muzzin.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion [40] is GRANTED as to all other

claims insofar as they name Defendants Sanders, Stovall-Hill and Muzzin in their official capacities.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion [40] is GRANTED as to the Eighth

Amendment claims stated against Defendants Sanders and Stovall-Hill.
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion [40] is DENIED as to the

individual-capacity Eighth Amendment claim stated against Defendant Muzzin. On that claim,

Defendant Muzzin is not entitled to qualified immunity.

Thus, the individual-capacity Eighth Amendment claim stated against Defendant Muzzin is

the sole claim to survive Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [40]. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Sanders and Stovall-Hill are DISMISSED from this

action.

SO ORDERED.

S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

Arthur J. Tarnow

Senior United States District Judge

Dated: July 15, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on July 15, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LISA M. WARE 

Case Manager
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-29; RM-8731]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Chester and Richmond, VA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Hoffman Communications, 
Inc., substitutes Channel 266A for Channel 289A for Station WDYL(FM) at 
Chester, Virginia; and substitutes Channel 289A for Channel 266A for 
Station WSMJ(FM) at Richmond, Virginia; and modifies the authorizations 
of Station WDYL(FM) and WSMJ(FM), respectively. Channel 266A can be 
allotted to Chester and Channel 289A can be allotted to Richmond in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements and can be used at the transmitter sites specified in 
Stations WDYL(FM)'s and WSMJ(FM)'s authorizations, respectively. The 
coordinates for Channel 266A at Chester, Virginia, are 37-22-58 and 77-
25-41. The coordinates for Channel 289A at Richmond, Virginia, are 37-
30-52 and 77-30-28. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 12, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No.96-29, adopted June 21, 1996, and 
released June 28, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, 
NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Virginia, is 
amended by removing Channel 289A and adding Channel 266A at Chester; 
and by removing Channel 266A and adding Channel 289A at Richmond.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-16957 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ecoland
International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010, I, David
Wallace, Chief Executive Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




1.Such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010, fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and




2.The information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2010,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ecoland International, Inc.




Date: April 12, 2010




/s/ David
      WallaceDavid
      Wallace, Chief Executive Officer of Ecoland
              International,
      Inc.
aaedaOaad Uesty oad oustees oc39 tt30

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

YOLANDA MARIE HERBERT,

Personal Representative of the Estate of

MARIE HERMINIE BARRON, Deceased,

Plaintiff, No. 09-CV-12314-DT

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

DANNIE RAY BAKER, LT. THOMAS 

DIAZ, and OFFICER JOHN HANKINS,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on January 14, 2010 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

 Chief Judge, United States District Court

This matter having come before the Court on the November 5, 2009 Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael Hlunchaniuk,

recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Stipulation and Order entered in

the State court prior to removal of this action be denied, without prejudice; and no

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation having been filed by

any party; and the Court being fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

2:09-cv-12314-GER-MJH Doc # 55 Filed 01/14/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1015
Recommendation of November 5, 2009 [Dkt. # 37] is adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside Stipulation and

Order [Dkt. # 25] is DENIED, without prejudice.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: January 14, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on January 14, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Ruth Brissaud 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12314-GER-MJH Doc # 55 Filed 01/14/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1016
Order entered December 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00143-CR

TORRY GOODSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-62599-K

ORDER

On December 2, 2015, this Court ordered the Dallas County District Clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing both sides of all jury notes within seven days. To date, 

we have not received the supplemental record, nor have we had any correspondence from the 

clerk regarding the status of the record.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding the following.

 How many notes were sent by the jury to the trial court during deliberations.

 The manner in which the trial court responded to the jury’s questions.

 If the trial court responded in writing to each jury note, whether the record can be 

supplemented with the trial court’s written response.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing its written findings, any 

supporting documentation, and any orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of 

this order.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal will 

be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great
Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael O. Matthews, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|                      |  |     |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael O. Matthews                     
|                      |  |     |  | Michael O. Matthews                         
|                      |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                      |  |     |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TI GROUP AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, LLC.,

a Delaware limited liability company, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-12120

vs.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

PACIFIC COAST MS INDUSTRIES

CO., LTD, a California corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING SHOW CAUSE ORDER (#4)

On June 10, 2009, the Court ordered Plaintiff TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC

(Plaintiff) to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of diversity

jurisdiction, based upon Plaintiff’s failure to plead the citizenship of its members. 

Plaintiff answered the show cause order (Docket # 6) and represented that its sole

member is TI Automotive USA Holdings, Limited, a private limited company formed

under the laws of England and Wales. Plaintiff further represented that Defendant

Pacific Coast MS Industries Co., LTD is a California corporation with its principal place

of business in Tracy, California. Plaintiff also filed an amended complaint (Docket # 5),

making these jurisdictional allegations. 

Accordingly, complete diversity appears to exist between the parties and

dismissal is unwarranted at this time. Accordingly, the order to show cause (Docket #

4) is hereby DISMISSED.

2:09-cv-12120-GCS-VMM Doc # 7 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 26
2

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 23, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

June 23, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-12120-GCS-VMM Doc # 7 Filed 06/23/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 27
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36092-36093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17309]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 96-069]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Prospective Patent License.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that HITCO Technologies, Inc., of 
Gardena, California 90249, Materials and Electrochemical Research 
Corporation (MER), of Tucson, Arizona 85706, P&P Machine Tool, Inc., of 
Fort Wayne, Indiana 46803, have each applied for partially exclusive 
licenses to practice the following patented inventions: U.S. Patent No. 
4,683,809, ``LIGHTWEIGHT PISTON''; U.S. Patent No. 4,736,676, 
``COMPOSITE PISTON''; U.S. Patent No. 4,909,133, ``LIGHTWEIGHT PISTON 
ARCHITECTURE''; and for the following inventions: NASA Case LAR-15,094-
1, entitled ``CONCEPT FOR A RINGLESS CARBON-CARBON PISTON IN INTERNAL 
COMBUSTION ENGINES''; NASA Case No. LAR-15,462-1, entitled ``INTEGRAL 
RING CARBON-CARBON PISTON''; NASA Case No. LAR-15,492-1, entitled 
``CARBON-CARBON PISTON ARCHITECTURES''; and NASA Case No. LAR-15,493-1, 
entitled ``PISTON AND CYLINDERS MADE OF CARBON-CARBON COMPOSITE.'' 
Written objections to the prospective grant of a license should be sent 
to George F. Helfrich, Patent Counsel, Langley Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by Sept. 9, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George F. Helfrich, Patent Counsel, Langley Research Center, Mail Code

[[Page 36093]]

212, Hampton, VA 23681; telephone (804) 864-9260.

    Dated: June 27, 1996.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-17309 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
NAIDIGH WURMAN
BIRNBAUM & MADAY, LLP


 


 


80
Cuttermill Road, Suite 410


Great
Neck, New York 11021


Telephone
(516) 498-2900


Facsimile
(516) 466-3555


 


	Richard S. Naidich	Mark Birnbaum
	Kenneth H. Wurman	Bernard S. Feldman
	Ronald C. Maday (Ret.)	Robert P. Johnson
	      ________	Of Counsel
	Judah A. Eisner	 


 


January 30, 2013


 


Via Federal Express


ATTUNE RTD


3700 East Tachevah Drive
- B117


Palm Springs, CA 92262


Attn: THOMAS BIANCO,
Chief Financial Officer


 


	 	Re:	Asher Enterprises . Inc. with ATTUNE RTD



 


Dear Mr. Bianco:


 


As
you know, Asher Enterprises, Inc. (the “Investor”) advanced funds to ATTUNE RTD a Nevada corporation (the “Company”)
and the Company entered into, among other things three Convertible Promissory Notes (i) dated September 28, 2011 in the principal
amount of $42,500.00 (which principal amount has since been reduced to $34,500.00, by Asher exercising its conversion rights);
(ii) dated December 7, 2011 in the principal amount of $42,500.00 and (iii) dated December 3, 2012 in the principal amount of $3,000.00,
each bearing a per annum interest rate of 8% (the “Notes”). The Note provide in pertinent part that the Company shall
be in default if it fails to pay principal or interest when due on this Note. The Notes by its terms had a maturity date of July
3, 2012 September 12, 2012 and September 5, 2013 and the Company failed to pay the remaining principal balance together with accrued
and unpaid interest upon the maturity date.


 


Based
upon the: foregoing, the Company is now in default under the Note. Demand is hereby made for the immediate payment as provided
in the Notes of $120,000.00 (representing 150% of the remaining; outstanding principal balance) together with Default Interest
as provided for in the Notes (the “Default Amount”). Your failure to comply with the demands of this letter will result
in the investor exercising all rights under the Notes. Additionally, should the Default Amount not be paid within 5 business days
from the date of this letter, in addition to all the other rights and remedies available to it, the Investor shall in its sole
discretion convert the Default Amount into equity as provided for in the Notes


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Bernard S. Feldman, Of Counsel