alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                          [GRANT THORNTON LETTERHEAD]




                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated 5 September 1997, accompanying the
consolidation package expressed in pounds sterling consisting of the
consolidated balance sheet at 28 June 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of income and cashflow of British Trimmings Limited for the year
ended 28 June 1997 for the purpose of inclusion in the consolidated financial
statements of Conso International Corporation (formerly known as Conso Products
Company) for the fiscal year ended 3 July 1999. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report on Forms S-8 (file nos 333-20671,
effective 29 January 1997, 33-97146, effective 20 September 1995 and 33-85518,
effective 20 October 1994), incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Conso International Corporation (formerly known as Conso Products
Company) for the fiscal year ended 3 July 1999.


/s/ Grant Thornton

GRANT THORNTON
MANCHESTER
UNITED KINGDOM

30 September 1999
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 2109** 

SHIRLEY A. HIRSHAUER; JAMES A. GERBEN, JR.; RANDY W. GERBEN; JASON W. GERBEN ,
Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v.
THOMAS G. ROSS, Judge; BROOKE SCHUMM, III; THE ESTATE OF GERALDINE GRAY; TERRY BRUMWELL; ALICE HALL; ELIZABETH O’SHEA; HONORABLE THOMAS G. ROSS ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , Chief District Judge. ( 1 :15

- cv
- 00832

- CCB )

Submitted : January 14, 2016 Decided: January 19, 2016

Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Shirley A. Hirshauer; James A. Gerben, Jr.; Randy W. Gerben; Jason W. Gerben, Appellants Pro Se. Alexis Burrell Rohde, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephan Young Brennan, ILIFF, MEREDITH, WILDBERGER & BRENNAN, P.C., Pasadena, Maryland; Brooke Schumm, III, DANEKER, MCINTIRE, SCHUMM, PRINCE, Baltimore, Maryland, f or Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Shirley A. Hirshauer, James A. Gerben, Jr., Randy W.

Gerben, and Jason W. Gerben appeal the district court ’ s order
denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Hirshauer v. Ross , No. 1:15

- cv
- 00832

- CCB (D. Md. Aug.

26, 2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 4, 2015

d1028 

# Order

Clerk November 4, 2015

151376

TRUSTEES OF THE METROPOLITAN

DETROIT PLUMBING INDUSTRY

TRAINING TRUST FUND/DETROIT

PLUMBING INDUSTRY JOINT

APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 151376

COA: 323041

St. Clair CC: 14

- 000437

- AV

STEVEN T. RIDENOUR,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 26, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J. I would remand this case to the Court of Appe als for consideration

as on leave granted of the meaning of the contract in dispute, in particular the

significance of the term “engaged” in that contract.

B ERNSTEIN , J., joins the statement of M ARKMAN , J.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lucky Strike
Explorations Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Michael Noble, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 2, 2011                    By: /s/ Michael Noble
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael Noble
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL ESTEBAN SOTO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2815

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

 )

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed July 12, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Gary R. Gossett, Jr., Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, 

for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford 

Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 28.5


                      CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

      The undersigned certifies that he is an Authorized Officer of Wilmington
Trust Company, as Owner Trustee for Chase Manhattan RV Owner Trust 1997-A and
that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of
the Issuer in connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer
and Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as
of September 1, 1997 (the "Indenture") and the Sale and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of September 1, 1997 (the "Agreement"), among CITSF, as Servicer, Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association and Chase Manhattan Bank, as Sellers,
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee. All capitalized terms used
herein without definition shall have the respective meanings specified in the
Indenture and the Agreement.

      The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of the
Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under his supervision and,
to the best of his knowledge, the Issuer has fulfilled its obligations under the
Indenture for the preceding calendar year.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this day of
March, 2000.

                                    CHASE MANHATTAN  RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                                    BY:   WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Owner
                                    Trustee



                                    /s/ Denise Geran
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Denise Geran
                                    Title: Financial Servicers Officer

The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc., as Servicer, hereby requests that
Wilmington Trust Company execute the above Issuer's Certificate and deliver
it to Norwest Bank, Minnesota  National Association, as Indenture Trustee.

                                    THE CIT GROUP/SALES FINANCING,
                                    INC., as Servicer



                                    /s/ Frank Garcia
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Name:   Frank Garcia
                                    Title:  Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MINHAS ENERGY CONSULTANTS,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Ravinder Minhas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Ravinder Minhas
                                         --------------------------
Date: May 1, 2007                        Ravinder Minhas
                                         Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-12129 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

BERNADETTE STONE, MICHAEL LEWIS,

JAN BIGELOW, and TRACIE SHAW,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 ORDER (# 21)

The circumstances of this case are set forth in the court's earlier September 14,

2009 Order granting the defendants' motion to impose costs and stay proceedings, and

November 17, 2009 Order denying pro se plaintiff David Scott's motion to modify order.

On September 14, 2009, Scott was ordered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(d) to pay the Office of the Michigan Attorney General $1,285.07 in costs incurred in

Scott v. Stone, 03-75123 ("Scott I"), and to pay the Clerk of the Court $1,616.55,

representing the cost of assembling jurors in Stone I. The matter was stayed until Scott

demonstrated to the court on or before December 14, 2009 that these costs had been paid.

Scott was forewarned that this lawsuit would be dismissed if he failed to demonstrate to the

court on or before December 14, 2009 that these costs had been paid. On November 17,

2009, the court denied Scott's motion to modify the September 14, 2009 Order. Scott has

failed to demonstrate that he has paid the costs as ordered. Accordingly,

Scott's claims are hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, in their entirety. Before

again refiling this lawsuit, Scott is hereby ORDERED to show cause before refiling that he

2:09-cv-12129-RSW Doc # 25 Filed 12/15/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 110
has in fact paid the costs as required under the September 14, 2009 Order. Any refiling

of this lawsuit SHALL prominently indicate that the refiling is a companion case to Scott v.

Stone, 03-75123 (GCS) and Scott v. Stone, 09-12129 (GCS). Scott's failure to

demonstrate that he has paid the costs under the September 14, 2009 Order and/or failure

to prominently identify any refiling as a companion case to Scott v. Stone, 03-75123 (GCS)

and Scott v. Stone, 09-12129 (GCS) will result in the denial or dismissal of the refiling. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 15, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

December 15, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-12129-RSW Doc # 25 Filed 12/15/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 111
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CLIFTON E JACKSON and 

CHRISTOPHER M SCHARNITZKE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-11529

Honorable David M. Lawson

v. 

SEGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES, INC., COCA COLA 

ENTERPRISES, INC., and PAUL 

DROUILLARD,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING IN PART EX PARTE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION

The matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs’ ex parte motion to file a brief in support

of their response to the defendant’s motion to dismiss that exceeds the page limitations of the local

rules. The plaintiffs ask for permission to file a forty-one page brief. The Court has reviewed the

matter and finds that a thirty-five page brief is adequate space for the plaintiffs to make their

argument.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s ex parte motion to exceed page limitation

[dkt. #23] is GRANTED IN PART. The plaintiff may file a brief in opposition to the motion to

dismiss that does not exceed thirty-five pages.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 22, 2009

2:09-cv-11529-NGE-VMM Doc # 28 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 404
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 22, 2009.

s/Lisa M. Ware 

LISA M. WARE

2:09-cv-11529-NGE-VMM Doc # 28 Filed 07/22/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 405
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of TIAA-CREF U.S.
  Real Estate Fund I, L.P. (the Fund) do hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Fund for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.

|                       |  |                                                                                 
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Scott C. Evans                                                              
|                       |  | Scott C. EvansPrincipal Executive OfficerTIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P.
|                       |  |                                                                                 
|Dated: August 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Phillip S. Nickolenko                                                       
|                       |  | Phillip S. Nickolenko                                                           
|                       |  | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                      
|                       |  | TIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P.                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TIAA-CREF U.S. Real Estate Fund I, L.P. and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and
  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

26



---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army


Availability of Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially-Exclusive 
Licensing Ferroelectric Materials Technology

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Maryland.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive Licenses under 
patents U.S. Patent No. 5,486,491, issued 23 Jan 1996, entitled 
``Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material--BSTO-ZR02''; U.S. Patent 
No. 5,312,790, issued 17 May 1994, entitled ``Ceramic Ferroelectric 
Material''; and U.S. Patent No. 5,427,998, issued 27 Jun 1995, entitled 
``Ceramic Ferroelectric Composite Material--BSTO-MGO'' Licenses shall 
comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Michael D. Rausa, Technology Transfer Office (APG Site), AMSRL-TT-
TA, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-
5425, telephone number (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written objections must be filed within 3 
months from the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-17415 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-136473, 333-128923, 333-115840, 333-110264, 333-44954, 333-92629, 333-92631, 333-57331, 333-32911, 333-08863, 333-156239 and 333-149741 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 20, 2009, relating to the
consolidated financial statements of FEI Company and subsidiaries (the Company) (which report includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109), and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2008.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|February 20, 2009        
|Portland, OR
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JERMAINE CLEAVON GOLDEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-96-153; CA-02-984-2) Submitted: January 28, 2004 Decided: February 17, 2004 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Cleavon Golden, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jermaine Cleavon Golden, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Golden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM-10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,402
<INVENTORY>                                     32,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,437
<PP&E>                                          42,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,167
<BONDS>                                          7,645
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,979
<SALES>                                        102,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,519
<CGS>                                           63,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   140
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,326
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Printing Components Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Herb Adams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 13th day of November, 2007.

HERB ADAMSHerb AdamsChief Executive Officer






































---