alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rod A. Shipman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CPC of America, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and I have:

         (a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         (b)      evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this reported my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period
covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)      disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
over financial reporting.



March 30, 2004                           /s/  Rod A. Shipman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Rod A. Shipman, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4002 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4002

 To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide equitable 
 treatment for barley producers so that 1996 contract payments to the 
    producers are not reduced to a greater extent than the average 
percentage reduction in contract payments for other commodities, while 
 maintaining the level of contract payments for other commodities, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. Pomeroy (for himself, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Williams, 
and Mr. Peterson of Minnesota) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide equitable 
 treatment for barley producers so that 1996 contract payments to the 
    producers are not reduced to a greater extent than the average 
percentage reduction in contract payments for other commodities, while 
 maintaining the level of contract payments for other commodities, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION OF BARLEY PAYMENT INEQUITY.

    Section 113 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (title I of 
Public Law 104-127; 7 U.S.C. 7213) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
        (f) and (g), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Additional Barley Allocation.--In addition to the adjustments 
required under subsection (c), the amount allocated under subsection 
(b)(4) for barley contract payments shall be increased by $35,000,000 
for fiscal year 1996.''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1209 

To allow for additional flights beyond the perimeter restriction applicable 

to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8, 2009 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. COBURN, Mr. KYL, 

Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. DEMINT) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To allow for additional flights beyond the perimeter restriction applicable to Ronald Reagan Washington National 

Airport. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENDING THE LENGTH OF FLIGHTS FROM 

4 RONALD REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL 

5 AIRPORT. 

6 Section 41718 of title 49, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(g) USE OF AIRPORT SLOTS FOR BEYOND PERIM9 ETER FLIGHTS.—Notwithstanding section 49109 or any 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1209 IS

1 other provision of law, any air carrier that holds or oper2 ates air carrier slots at Ronald Reagan Washington Na3 tional Airport as of January 1, 2009, pursuant to subparts 

4 K and S of part 93 of title 14, Code of Federal Regula5 tions, which are being used as of that date for scheduled 

6 service between that airport and a large hub airport (as 

7 defined in section 40102(a)(29)), may use such slots for 

8 service between Ronald Reagan Washington National Air9 port and any airport located outside of the perimeter re10 striction described in section 49109.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Case 2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM ECF No. 3061, PageID.23214 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM ECF No. 3061, PageID.23215 Filed 01/19/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM ECF No. 3061, PageID.23216 Filed 01/19/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-20465-NGE-MKM ECF No. 3061, PageID.23217 Filed 01/19/21 Page 4 of 4
4439434.11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) Case No. 2:09-cv-10881

)

v. ) Judge George Caram Steeh

)

RONALD S. BARCZYK, ET AL., ) Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen

)

Defendants. )

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST RONALD S. BARCZYK

This matter comes before the Court on the United States’ motion for default judgment

against Ronald S. Barczyk and Deborah A. Barczyk (Docket Entry No. 8). Having found good

cause to set aside the entry of default against Deborah A. Barczyk, the United States’ motion is

DENIED, in part, with respect to Deborah A. Barczyk. However, it appearing that the defendant

Ronald S. Barczyk is in default for failure to plead or otherwise defend as required by law, the

United States’ motion is GRANTED, in part, with respect to Ronald S. Barczyk. Therefore, it is

hereby ORDERED, DECREED, and ADJUDICATED that — 

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED against defendant Ronald S. Barczyk and in favor of the

United States for his unpaid federal income taxes, interest, and statutory additions for the

income tax years ending December 31, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,

2005, and 2006, in the total amount of $528,771.55, plus statutory additions from July 14, 2007, 

including interest pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621 and 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), until

this judgment is fully paid;

2:09-cv-10881-GCS-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 09/21/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 78
- 2 - 4439434.11

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED.

Dated: September 21, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 21, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10881-GCS-RSW Doc # 17 Filed 09/21/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 79
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles R. Howell IV, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: April 30, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles R. Howell IV                             
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Charles R. Howell IV                                 
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 115-4    Filed 06/16/11   Pg 1 of 2    Pg ID 2920

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 115-4    Filed 06/16/11   Pg 2 of 2    Pg ID 2921
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID SCOTT,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-12129 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

BERNADETTE STONE, MICHAEL LEWIS,

JAN BIGELOW, and TRACIE SHAW,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (# 26)

Plaintiff David Scott, appearing pro se, moves for reconsideration of the court's

December 15, 2009 Order dismissing his claims without prejudice for failure to comply with

the court's September 14, 2009 Order. Scott's motion candidly admits that he has not

complied with the September 14, 2009 Order. Scott has also failed to demonstrate

palpable error. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3). Accordingly,

Scott's motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 4, 2010

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-12129-RSW Doc # 27 Filed 01/04/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 115
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

January 4, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-12129-RSW Doc # 27 Filed 01/04/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 116
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Allen E. CURD, Appellant. Allen CURD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49200, WD 50911.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 13, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Allen E. Curd appeals his criminal convictions, following a jury trial, of two counts of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, § 195.211, RSMo 1994, and the subsequent denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Curd was sentenced to two consecutive terms of ten years.

Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GERALD LEROY WERTH,

Petitioner, Case No. 09-11472

HON. JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

v.

CINDI S. CURTIN,

Respondent,

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the report and recommendation filed June 8, 2010 by

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives, as well as any objections thereto filed by the parties, and

being fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is accepted and adopted

as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus is

denied; a certificate of appealability is granted with respect to petitioner’s self-representation

claim, and denied with respect to petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. 

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: August 27, 2010
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of

record on this date, August 27, 2010, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16144]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for 
the Realignment of Towed and Self-Propelled Combat Vehicle Mission From 
Letterkenny Army Depot, Pennsylvania; the Associated Combat Vehicle 
Material and Management Functions From the Defense Distribution Depot 
Letterkenny, Pennsylvania (DDLP); and the 142nd Explosive Ordnance 
Detachment From McClellan, Alabama to Anniston Army Depot (ANAD), 
Alabama

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to a previous notice that 
was published Friday, June 14, 1996 (61 FR Vol 61, No. 116, page 
30228). On page 30228, in the second column the DATES paragraph is 
corrected to read as follows:

DATES: Inquiries will be accepted until June 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Neil Robison at the U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, ATTN: CESAM-PD-E, P.O. Box 2288, 
Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001 or by telephone at (334) 690-3018.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-16144 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Allen F. Bialek,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-10208

v. Hon. Sean F. Cox

American Color Graphics, Inc.,

Vertis, Inc.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

On April 7, 2010, Defendants filed a “Motion to Strike Docket Entry Nos. 47 and 48.”

(Docket Entry No. 50. 

In connection with this Court’s normal practices, this Court has already issued an order

striking Docket Entry No. 47 because it exceeds the allowable page limits.

As to the remaining submission that Defendants ask this Court to strike as untimely – Docket

Entry No. 48 – the Court shall DENY that request. Although Docket Entry No. 48 was untimely,

the document is substantially similar to Plaintiff’s submission filed as Docket Entry No. 41, and the

Court does not believe that Defendants will be unduly burdened by responding to Docket Entry No.

48. Defendants shall have until April 19, 2010 to file a response to Docket Entry No. 48.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

SEAN F. COX

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Date: April 8, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on 

April 9, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427
 
 I, Samuel
J. Alderson, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of 1st Home
Buy & Sell Ltd.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
      April 8, 2008
              
              /s/ Samuel
      J. AldersonSamuel
      J. Alderson
                Principal
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3902 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3902

To amend the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 
 1996 to extend the date specified for the transfer of certain amounts 
to be available for drinking water State revolving funds from August 1, 
                      1996, to September 30, 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 1996

  Mr. Dingell (for himself, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Stupak, and Mrs. Lincoln) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 
 1996 to extend the date specified for the transfer of certain amounts 
to be available for drinking water State revolving funds from August 1, 
                      1996, to September 30, 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DATE FOR TRANSFER OF SRF FUNDS.

    The first sentence under the heading ``State and Tribal Assistance 
Grants'' in the provisions of title III of the Omnibus Consolidated 
Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-134) 
relating to Independent Agencies under the heading ``Environmental 
Protection Agency'' is amended by striking ``August 1'' in each place 
it appears and inserting ``September 30''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:09-cv-12192-PJD-VMM Document 27-8 Filed 09/21/10 Page 18 of 18