alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 399

To amend title 18, United States Code, regarding false identification

documents.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, regarding false

identification documents.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘False Identification

5 Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS FOR CERTAIN

7 OFFENSE.

8 Section 1028 of title 18, United States Code, is

9 amended—
2

•HR 399 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘five’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘3’’; and

3 (2) in subsection (b)(1)(B), by striking ‘‘five’’

4 and inserting ‘‘3’’.

5 SEC. 3. REQUIRED VERIFICATION OF MAILED IDENTIFICA6 TION DOCUMENTS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 83 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing:

10 ‘‘§ 1739. Verification of identification documents

11 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly sends through the mails any

12 unverified identification document which bears a birth

13 date—

14 ‘‘(1) purporting to be that of the individual

15 named in the document; and

16 ‘‘(2) showing that individual to be 21 years of

17 age or older;

18 when in fact that individual has not attained the age of

19 21 years, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not

20 more than one year, or both.

21 ‘‘(b) As used in this section—

22 ‘‘(1) the term ‘unverified’, with respect to an

23 identification document, means that the sender has

24 not personally viewed a certification or other written
3

•HR 399 IH

1 communication confirming the age of the individual

2 to be identified in the document from—

3 ‘‘(A) a governmental entity within the

4 United States or any of its territories or posses5 sions; or

6 ‘‘(B) a duly licensed physician, hospital,

7 medical clinic within the United States; and

8 ‘‘(2) the term ‘identification document’ means a

9 card, certificate, or paper intended to be used pri10 marily to identify an individual.’’.

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

12 at the beginning of chapter 83 of title 18, United States

13 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

14 item:

‘‘1739. Verification of identification documents.’’.

15 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3001(a) of

16 title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘or

17 1738’’ and inserting ‘‘1738, or 1739’’.

Æ
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Brian Robertson, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Freshwater
      Technologies, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Freshwater Technologies, Inc.                                                               

Date: November 14, 2008

| | By | /s/ D.
      Brian Robertson        
| | -- | ------------------------------------
| |    | D. Brian Robertson                  
| |    | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer  
| |    | Vice-President of Sales and Director
| |    | (Principal Accounting
    Officer   
| |    | and Principal Financial Officer     

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Freshwater
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Freshwater Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00440

- CV

S HEIK T EHUTI

, Appellant

V

.

H A T O T U

, Appellee §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 1

of Tarrant County (2017

- 006596

- 1)

March 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittm an

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed as moot

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mar k T. Pittman

_________________ Ju stice Mark T. Pittman
Exhibit Fati's 1st Amend to employee agreement


Exhibit 10(o)




FIRST AMENDMENT
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this "Amendment", dated as of March 19, 2014, to the Employment Agreement, dated as of November 12, 2007 (the "Agreement"), by and between Perma-Pipe, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Perma-Pipe" or the "Employer"), and Fati Elgendy (the "Employee") is made by and between the Employer and the Employee.


WHEREAS, the Employer and the Employee desire to amend the Agreement to extend the Initial Term (as defined in the Agreement).


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Amendment, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Employment Term. Section l is hereby amended by adding the bolded italicized language and deleting the bolded, italicized and stricken language so that it reads as follows:




"The Employer agrees to employ the Employee and the Employee agrees to serve in the employ of the Employer from the date of this Agreement through January 31, 2017 for period of (5) years commencing on February 1, 2007, (the "Initial Term"), in the position and with the responsibilities and duties set forth in Section 2 and on the other terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. After the expiration of the Initial Term the Agreement will renew automatically for subsequent one year terms unless written notice is given by either party at least six (6) months in advance of the expiration of the Initial Term or any subsequent term. (The Initial Term as so extended is referred to herein as the "Term".)


		
	2.
	Confirmation of the Agreement. Except as expressly set forth herein, the Agreement, including, but not limited to, all provisions relating to term and termination, shall remain in full force and effect.




		
	3.
	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




	
		
	EMPLOYER:


	EMPLOYEE:

	Perma-Pipe Inc., a Delaware Corporation


	 

	 
	 

	By: /s/ David Unger
	By: /s/ Fati Elgendy

	Name: David Unger
	Name: Fati Elgendy

	Its: Chairman
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33-91218, Form S-3 No. 333-20143, Form S-8 No. 333-3310 and Form
S-8 No. 333-42735) of Jameson Inns, Inc. of our reports dated February 12,
1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jameson Inns,
Inc. and February 19, 1999, except as to Note 11 as to which the date is March
15, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Jameson
Hospitality, LLC included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jameson Inns,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                     Ernst & Young LLP
 
Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 1999
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GARRY SEGEL, No. 09-10125

Plaintiff, District Judge John Corbett O’Meara

v. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION,

ET AL.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER 

For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on October 29, 2009,

Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order [Docket #27] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

S/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: October 29, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served on the attorneys

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on October 29, 2009.

S/Gina Wilson 

Judicial Assistant

5:09-cv-10125-JCO-RSW Doc # 38 Filed 10/29/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 484
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






The undersigned, Steve Harding, the Chief Executive Officer and Brian Manko, Chief Financial Officer of American Exploration Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of American Exploration Corporation for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Exploration Corporation.




Date: August 16 2010




/s/ "Steve Harding"Steve Harding

President, Chief Executive Officer




/s/ "Brian Manko"Brian Manko

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Resources Corporation and will be retained by American Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 28.3

         Report of Independent Accountants

         March 15, 2000

         To the Board of Directors of
         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.


         We have examined management's assertion that, as of December 31, 1999,
         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of
         internal control over servicing of securitized automobile financing
         receivables, included in the accompanying Management Report on Internal
         Control Over Servicing of Securitized Automobile Financing Receivables.

         Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by
         the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
         accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of the internal
         control over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables,
         testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of the
         internal control, and such other procedures as we considered necessary
         in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
         reasonable basis for our opinion.

         Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors or
         irregularities may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
         evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting to future
         periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become
         inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
         compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

         In our opinion, management's assertion that, as of December 31, 1999,
         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of
         internal control over servicing of securitized automobile financing
         receivables, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based upon the
         criteria for effective internal control described in "Internal Control
         - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
         Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

         /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
         ---------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.02




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Ecoland International, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ending August 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
A. Wallace, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:





(1) 
      The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ David A.
      WallaceBy:
      David A. WallaceChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:
      October 14, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LAVERNE BANKS,

Personal Representative of the

Estate of A.T.B., deceased,

Civil No. 09-10808

Plaintiff,

Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor

vs.

HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, a 

Michigan Corporation, JUDETTE 

MARIE LOUIS, M.D., TIBERIU 

AVRAM, M.D., and the UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO THE WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

This Court having received the stipulation entered into by plaintiff and defendants

Harper-Hutzel Hospital, Dr. Louis and Dr. Avram, which stipulation agrees to a remand to state

court as the basis for subject matter jurisdiction no longer exists as an order dismissing the

United States of America as a party was entered by this Court on April 20, 2009. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is hereby remanded to the Wayne County

Circuit Court for the State of Michigan, without costs to any party.

DATED: May 5, 2009 s/Anna Diggs Taylor

HON. ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Stipulated Order of Dismissal was served upon counsel of record via the

Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic

Filing on May 5, 2009.

s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager

C L O S E D

Case 2:09-cv-10808-ADT-VMM ECF No. 6 filed 05/05/09 PageID.25 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LAVERNE BANKS,

Personal Representative of the

Estate of A.T.B., deceased,

Civil No. 09-10808

Plaintiff,

Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor

vs.

HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, a 

Michigan Corporation, JUDETTE 

MARIE LOUIS, M.D., TIBERIU 

AVRAM, M.D., and the UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF REMAND

It is hereby stipulated by and between the plaintiff and defendants, Harper-Hutzel

Hospital, Judette Marie Louis, M.D. and Tiberiu Avram, M.D., that this matter should be

remanded to the Wayne County Circuit Court as the basis for subject matter jurisdiction no

longer exists as an order dismissing the United States of America as a party was entered by this

Court on April 20, 2009. 

SOMMERS, SCHWARTZ, P.C.

s/with consent of Anne M. Schoepfle 

Attorney for Plaintiff

2000 Town Center, Suite 900

Southfield, MI 48075-1100

Phone: (248) 355-0300

P42673 

TANOURY, CORBET, SHAW, NAUTS, 

ESSAD & BEUTEL, P.L.L.C.

s/Linda M. Garbarino 

645 Griswold Street, Suite 2800

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Phone: (313) 964-6300

E-mail: Linda.Garbarino@tcsnlaw.com

P38359

2

Case 2:09-cv-10808-ADT-VMM ECF No. 6 filed 05/05/09 PageID.26 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit U

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1411-2 Filed 12/01/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. SACR 19-61-JVS Date October 15, 2021

Present: The Honorable JAMES V. SELNA, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Interpreter

Lisa Bredahl Sharon Seffens 

Brett Sagel

Alex Wyman (telephonically)

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Assistant U.S. Attorney

U.S.A. v. Defendant(s): Present Cust. Bond Attorneys for Defendants: Present App. Ret.

Michael John Avenatti, Pro Se X X

Dean Steward, Advisory

Counsel X X

Proceedings: TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE

Cause is called for hearing with the defendant present (telephonically), his advisory

counsel and the Government present.

The Court read and considered the briefs re jurisdiction and finds that the Court does not

have jurisdiction given the interlocutory appeal and vacates the November 2, 2021 trial date and

all pretrial dates.

The Court GRANTS THE Government’s ex parte application extending the deadline to

file the report on the TABS data by 30 days and IN PART regarding the subpoena as stated on

the record. Counsel shall meet and confer on a proposed order re the subpoena and submit it to

the Court. 

: 30

Initials of Deputy Clerk lmb

CR-11 (10/08) CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Case 8:19-cr-00061-JVS Document 866 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:19794 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1411-2 Filed 12/01/21 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

 SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 09-10481

SHARI RICKS,

Plaintiff(s),

-vAUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE CO., ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said court, held in the

 United States Courthouse, in the City of

 Detroit, State of Michigan, on February 23, 2009

 

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court having issued an Order to Show Cause for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction and the Defendant having filed a Response to Order to Show Cause, therefore;

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction be and the same is hereby SET ASIDE.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: February 23, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on February 23, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10481-PJD-SDP Doc # 6 Filed 02/23/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 30
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6855

VINCENT SQUIRE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MS. WITT; MS. MOSLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. (2:20-cv-00376-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 29, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Squire, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6855 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Squire seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice Squire’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to prosecute and providing Squire 

the opportunity to file an amended complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Squire seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See Britt v. DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 793, 797 (4th Cir. 2022) 

(en banc) (order) (explaining that a district court’s “order that dismisses a complaint with 

leave to amend is not a final decision” and that plaintiff must either file an amended 

complaint in the district court or “request that the district court enter a final decision 

dismissing [his] case without leave to amend”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6855 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/29/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PT PUKUAFU INDAH, PT LEBONG

TANDAI, PT TANJUNG SERA PUNG,

GIDEON MINERALS U.S.A., INC.,

and DR. LEONARD L.J. YOUNG,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 09-10943

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

UNITED STATES SECURITIES &

EXCHANGE COMMISSION, MARY

J. SCHAPIRO, THE EXPORT IMPORT

BANK OF THE UNITED STATES, JAMES H.

LAMBRIGHT, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.,

NEWMONT MINING CORP., GOLDMAN 

SACHS GROUP, INC., 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLC,

JAMES NELSON LANE, DEVONWOOD

CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, and

NEW CANAAN SOCIETY,

Defendants.

____________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM A FINAL

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS AND

THEIR COUNSEL

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District

of Michigan, on March 5, 2010.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiffs initiated this action against defendants on March 13, 2009. On July 15,

2009, this Court issued an opinion and order dismissing defendant Newmont Mining
2

Corporation (“Newmont”) for lack of personal jurisdiction. On October 6, 2009, the

Court granted motions to dismiss filed by the remaining defendants and entered a

judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs. Newmont thereafter filed a motion

for sanctions, which this Court granted in an opinion and order entered on November 4,

2009.

Presently before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief from a Final Judgment in

Favor of Defendants Against Plaintiffs and their Counsel, filed pursuant to Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) and (d)(3) on January 25, 2009. In their motion, plaintiffs

seek relief not only from the opinions and orders dismissing their claims against

defendants, but also the order imposing sanctions on plaintiffs and their counsel and in

favor of Newmont. Plaintiffs argue that they are entitled to relief as a result of fraud by

defendants.

A Rule 60(b) motion will be denied “if it is merely an attempt to relitigate the

case.” 11 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Kay Kane, Federal Practice and

Procedure § 2860 (2d ed.). The rule provides relief where a final judgment or order that

“has been procured by fraud . . .” 35B C.J.S. Federal Civil Procedure § 1260 (2009).

“[T]he fraud must have prevented the moving party from fully and fairly presenting [its]

case.” 11 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Kay Kane, Federal Practice and

Procedure § 2860 (2d ed.).

The alleged fraud that plaintiffs identify in their motion is not directed toward

conduct in this action. Instead, plaintiffs assert the same misconduct that they alleged in
3

their complaint and amended complaint. Therefore, plaintiffs fail to demonstrate that

they are entitled to relief pursuant to Rule 60(b)(3).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that plaintiffs’ motion for relief from judgment is DENIED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record