alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 406

To direct the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to

conduct a study of the feasibility of establishing a National Angler’s License.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ZIMMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife

Service to conduct a study of the feasibility of establishing a National Angler’s License.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL ANGLER’S LICENSE STUDY.

4 (a) STUDY.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the United

6 States Fish and Wildlife Service shall conduct a

7 study of the feasibility of—

8 (A) establishing, under Federal law, a Na9 tional Angler’s License that would grant to a

10 holder of such a license the right to engage in
2

•HR 406 IH

1 recreational fishing in navigable waters in any

2 State under the same conditions and restric3 tions that apply under the laws of the State to

4 an individual who holds a license, permit, or

5 other authorization for that fishing issued by

6 the State; and

7 (B) offering with such a license National

8 Species Tags for various species that authorize

9 the holder of the license to engage in a State

10 in recreational fishing for a particular species of

11 fish under the same conditions and restrictions

12 that apply under any special tag or other au13 thorization required under the laws of the State

14 for that fishing.

15 (2) FEES.—The study shall include develop16 ment of formulas for imposition of fees for National

17 Angler’s Licenses and National Species Tags and al18 location among the States of amounts received as

19 such fees that would completely offset all decreases

20 in State revenues resulting from any reduction in

21 sales of State recreational fishing licenses because of

22 the issuance of National Angler’s Licenses or Na23 tional Species Tags.

24 (3) STATE AUTHORITY PRESERVED.—The Na25 tional Angler’s Licenses and National Species Tags
3

•HR 406 IH

1 to be studied under this subsection are licenses and

2 tags that could be used in lieu of, but would not su3 persede or preempt, any license, tag, or other au4 thorization required under State law.

5 (4) MARINE WATERS.—Nothing in this Act

6 shall authorize the study, recommendation, adoption,

7 or implementation of a Federal license to engage in

8 recreational fishing in marine waters.

9 (b) REPORT.—The Director shall submit a report to

10 the Congress on the study conducted under this section,

11 by not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment

12 of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44983-44984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER03-295-003; ER04-1194-001]


SESCO Enterprises, LLC SESCO Enterprises Canada, Ltd.; Notice of 
Filing

July 25, 2008.
    Take notice that on June 19, 2008, SESCO Enterprises, LLC and SESCO 
Enterprises Canada, Ltd tendered for filing for Determination of 
Category 1 Status Under Order No. 697 and Modification of Market-Based 
Rate Tariff.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies

[[Page 44984]]

of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55131007161a3b393c3b30062025253a272115333027367b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="22646770616d4c4e4b4c47715752524d505662444750410c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 1, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-17627 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3710 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3710

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 
 North Florida Avenue in Tampa, Florida, as the ``Sam M. Gibbons United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 611 North 
Florida Avenue in Tampa, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 
``Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sam M. Gibbons 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall become effective on January 3, 1997.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Edward McDONALD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Respondent.

No. 69414.

Missouri Court *of*Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 29, 1996.

Robert S. Adler, St. Louis, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A Chenault, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for responden1>-respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals the denial of his request for a trial de novo to review the revocation of his driver’s license under § 302.505, RSMo 1994, for driving with a blood-alcohol content of .10 percent or more. Petitioner alleges the trial court erred 1) in admitting exhibits A and B because the court failed to judicially recognize the relevant state regulations, and 2) that the records submitted to the court contained insufficient evidence to establish probable cause for arrest. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TYRELL LADON RICHARDSON,

Petitioner, Case No. 2:09-CV-11088

v. HONORABLE AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DEBRA L. SCUTT,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

JUDGMENT

The above entitled matter having come before the Court on a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus, Honorable Avern Cohn, a United States District Court Judge, presiding,

and in accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered on November 29, 2011.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Certificate of Appealability is

DENIED.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this _29th, day of November, 2011

S/Avern Cohn

Honorable Avern Cohn

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Tyrell Richardson 

601396, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility, 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201 and

the attorneys of record on this date, November 29, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary

mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-11088-AC-MKM Doc # 17 Filed 11/29/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 917
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________
No. 98-10158

______________________

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas

(3:97-CV-986-R)

_________________________________________

April 20, 1999

Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having reviewed the briefs and the record, and concluding that there was a sufficient

basis for requesting the subpoena at issue, the challenged orders of the district court are

AFFIRMED.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 10, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00392-CV

JAY COHEN, Appellant

V.

TOURS PARTNERS, LTD. AND PRESTON REALTY CORPORATION, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-41051

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 28, 2015. The clerk’s 

record was filed June 10, 2015. No reporter’s record was taken. Appellant’s brief 

was due October 15, 2015. No brief was filed.

On October 29, 2015, appellee filed a motion to dismiss for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, 
2

appellee’s motion is granted and the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EARLE STEINBERG, Case No. 09-11836

Plaintiff, HONORABLE SEAN F. COX

United States District Judge

v.

CHARLES YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTARY BRIEFING 

IN ADVANCE OF THE COURT’S JUNE 24, 2009 HEARING 

The Court is scheduled to hear oral argument regarding two of Plaintiff’s motions on

Wednesday, June 24, 2009 at 2:00 pm: 1) Plaintiff’s “Motion for Preliminary Injunction” [Doc.

No. 11]; and 2) Plaintiff’s “Motion for Appointment of Receiver” [Doc. No. 12]. 

In its responses in opposition to both motions, intervenor JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

(“JP Morgan Chase”) argues that it has a security interest entitled to priority in all of the assets

of Defendant Charles Young’s business entities. In support of that argument, JP Morgan Chase

attached copies of security agreements and UCC financing statements covering the assets of two

entities: 1) SDE Business Partnering, LLC [See Doc. No. 15, Exs. 4, 5]; and 2) SDE MRO

Express, LLC [See Doc. No. 15, Exs. 6, 7]. Other filings in the instant action allege that SDE

MRO Express, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SDE Business Partnering, LLC. 

A third business entity, SDE MRO Express, Inc. n/k/a SDE Business Services, Inc.

(“SDE MRO INC”) is also alleged to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of SDE Business Partnering,

LLC. JP Morgan Chase has not alleged, however, that it has a perfected security interest in the

2:09-cv-11836-SFC-DAS Doc # 32 Filed 06/22/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1784
2

assets of SDE MRO INC. To the extent that Plaintiff alleges that fraudulent transactions have

diminished the assets of SDE MRO INC, the Court finds the question of JP Morgan Chase’s

priority, if any, in the assets of SDE MRO INC to be of importance in this case. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff Earle Steinberg and intervenor JP Morgan Chase are ORDERED

to file supplementary briefs, with supporting documentation, no later than Tuesday, June 23,

2009, regarding any priority JP Morgan Chase may enjoy in the assets of SDE MRO INC. 

Specifically, the parties should address the following issues: 1) whether JP Morgan Chase has a

perfected security interest in the assets of SDE MRO INC; and if not, 2) whether JP Morgan

Chase’s security interest in the assets of SDE Business Partnering, LLC, extends to cover the

assets of SDE MRO INC. Briefs on these issues shall be limited to three (3) pages in length. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: June 22, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

June 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-11836-SFC-DAS Doc # 32 Filed 06/22/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1785
EX-4.4



 Exhibit 4.4 

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION 
 OF 

MARATHON PETROLEUM LOGISTICS OPERATIONS LLC 

1. The name of the limited liability company is Marathon Petroleum Logistics Operations LLC. 

2. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is: Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington,
Delaware 19801. The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company. 
 3. The Certificate of Formation shall
be effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of Delaware. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Formation this 14th day of March, 2012. 
  

	
	 /s/ Lori A. Coon

	Name: Lori A. Coon
	Title: Organizer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. (Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael O. Matthews, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |     |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael O. Matthews                     
|                      |  |     |  | Michael O. Matthews                         
|                      |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
|                      |  |     |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Summons in a Civil Case

Weather Underground,

Incorporated,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:09−cv−10756−MOB−VMM

Hon. Marianne O Battani

Navigation Catalyst Systems,

Incorporated, et al.,

Defendant(s).

Notice to Defendant Connexus Corporation

This summons is notification that you are being sued by the above named plaintiff(s). You are

required to:

1. Serve upon the plaintiff's attorney:

Craig E. Schaefer

810 Cottageview Drive

Suite G−20

Traverse City, MI

49684

an answer to the complaint within twenty (20) days after receiving this summons, or

take other actions that are permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. File with the court any answer that you serve on the parties to this action within the time

limits specified.

Failure to answer or take other actions permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may

result in the issuance of a judgment by default against you for the relief demanded in the

complaint.

David J. Weaver, Clerk of Court By: s/ L. Behringer 

Deputy Clerk

Date of Issuance: February 27, 2009

Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al Doc. 

Dockets.Justia.com
Summons and Complaint Return of Service

Case No. 2:09−cv−10756−MOB−VMM

Hon. Marianne O Battani

A copy of the Summons and Complaint has been served upon the Defendant in the manner

indicated below:

Name of Defendant Served: Connexus Corporation

Date of Service:

Method of Service

Personally served at this address:

Left copies at defendant's usual place of abode with (name of person):

Other (specify):

Returned unexecuted (reason):

Service Fees: Travel $ Service $ Total $ 

Declaration of Server

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Return of Service is

true and correct.

Name of Server:

Signature of Server:

Date:

Server's Address:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

I, Raymond A. Link,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of FEI Company on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such annual report on Form 10-Kfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of FEI Company.

 

 
| By:                          | /s/ RAYMOND A. LINK |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Raymond A. Link              |                |
| Executive Vice President and |                |
| Chief Financial Officer      |                |

 

February 29, 2008

 

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4019

To amend the Fair Housing Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 4, 1996

Mr. BILBRAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Fair Housing Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Housing Reform

5 and Freedom of Speech Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING ACT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

8 807(b)(1) of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3607(b)(1))

9 is amended by inserting before the period the following:

10 ‘‘, including any restriction relating to the maximum num11 ber of unrelated persons permitted to occupy a dwelling,

12 governing the proximity of dwellings to each other, or the
2

•HR 4019 IH

1 occupancy of a dwelling by a convicted felon, sex offender,

2 or recovering drug addict, if the purpose of the restriction

3 is to restrict land use to single family dwellings’’.

4 (b) PROTECTION OF CERTAIN ACTIVITIES.—Title I

5 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.) is

6 amended by adding at the end the following new section:

7 ‘‘SEC. 821. PROTECTION OF CERTAIN ACTIVITIES.

8 ‘‘Nothing in this Act shall be construed to apply to

9 any otherwise lawful activity engaged in by one or more

10 persons, including the filing or maintaining of a legal ac11 tion, that is engaged in solely for the purpose of—

12 ‘‘(1) achieving or preventing action by a govern13 mental entity or official; or

14 ‘‘(2) receiving an interpretation of any provision

15 of this Act in a court of competent jurisdiction.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.2


           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Dan River Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.

         The foregoing certification is to the best knowledge of the
undersigned.


                                /s/ Joseph L. Lanier, Jr.
                                -------------------------------
                                Joseph L. Lanier, Jr., Chief Executive Officer


                                /s/ Barry F. Shea
                                -----------------------------
                                Barry F. Shea, Chief Financial Officer




                                February  20, 2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT GINEMAN, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-11955

v.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN 

AFFAIRS),

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On April 27, 2011, the court held a hearing on defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. Counsel for the parties appeared and argued at the hearing. After consideration

of the arguments presented in the briefs and at the hearing, the court finds that, at this time,

summary judgment for defendant is appropriate. For the reasons stated on the record,

defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the case is dismissed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 27, 2011

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

April 27, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11955-GCS-MKM Doc # 22 Filed 04/27/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 231