alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45022-45023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C.,

[[Page 45023]]

as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse 
and Alcoholism.
    Date: September 17-18, 2008.
    Closed: September 17, 2008, 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Open: September 18, 2008, 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Program reports and presentations.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Executive Secretary, 
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, National 
Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3039, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-443-9737, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9dbd8cccdd0cacdd8d8f9d4d8d0d597d7d0d197ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85e7e4f0f1ecf6f1e4e4c5e8e4ece9abebecedabe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://silk.nih.gov/silk/niaaa1/about/roster.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-17583 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 033-90926 and 333-75706 on Form S-8 and No. 333-38338 on Form S-3 of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. of our report dated April 5, 2011, with respect tothe balance sheets of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010,which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

Our report datedApril 5, 2011 contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has $38.4 million of debt payments and maturities due in 2011, including a one-time payment in the amount of $32.7 million due on June 30, 2011. TheCompany’s cash flows from operations are not sufficient to fund these debt obligations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might resultfrom the outcome of that uncertainty. 

**/s/ KPMG LLP**

Denver, Colorado 

April 5, 2011
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3891

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to provide for the regulation of

contracts for the purchase or sale of a commodity for future delivery,

which are made on or subject to the rules of a board of trade, exchange,

or market located outside the United States, when the commodity is

deliverable in the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 1996

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to provide for the

regulation of contracts for the purchase or sale of a

commodity for future delivery, which are made on or

subject to the rules of a board of trade, exchange, or

market located outside the United States, when the commodity is deliverable in the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3891 IH

1 SECTION 1. REGULATION OF FOREIGN FUTURES CON2 TRACTS DELIVERABLE IN THE UNITED

3 STATES.

4 (a) REGULATION OF FOREIGN CONTRACTS DELIVER5 ABLE IN UNITED STATES.—Section 4 of the Commodity

6 Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 6) is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(other than

8 a contract’’ and inserting ‘‘(subject to subsection

9 (b), other than a contract’’; and

10 (2) in subsection (b)—

11 (A) by striking ‘‘No’’ in the third sentence

12 and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in the next

13 sentence, no’’; and

14 (B) by adding at the end the following new

15 sentence: ‘‘An agreement, contract, or trans16 action for the purchase or sale for future deliv17 ery of a commodity deliverable in the United

18 States shall be subject to the requirements of

19 subsection (a) notwithstanding the fact that the

20 agreement, contract, or transaction is made on

21 or subject to the rules of a board of trade, ex22 change, or market located outside the United

23 States, its territories or possessions.’’.

24 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 4b(c) of

25 such Act (7 U.S.C. 6b(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘Noth26 ing in this section’’ and inserting ‘‘Except with respect
3

•HR 3891 IH

1 to an agreement, contract, or transaction for the purchase

2 or sale for future delivery of a commodity deliverable in

3 the United States, nothing in this section’’.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall take effect six months after the date of

6 the enactment of this Act and shall apply to agreements,

7 contracts, and transactions for the purchase or sale of

8 commodities for future delivery that are entered into on

9 or after such effective date.

Æ
exv10w35






Exhibit 10.35




EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTICE OF SECOND AMENDMENT TO GRANT OF

UNIT APPRECIATION RIGHTS




     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO GRANT OF UNIT APPRECIATION RIGHTS (the “Amendment”) is delivered by
Exterran Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).



W I T N E S S E T H:




     WHEREAS, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. previously granted to the Grantee unit
appreciation rights (“UARs”) with respect to Common Units of Universal Compression Partners, L.P.,
pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in an award agreement, as amended (the “Agreement”);
and



     WHEREAS, as of August 20, 2007, the Company assumed the obligations of Universal Compression
Holdings, Inc., with respect to the UARs granted under the Agreement and the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) has the authority to determine the terms
and conditions of the Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Agreement to comply with the final regulations
issued under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code;



     NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the close of business on December 31, 2008, the Agreement is
hereby amended as follows:



     1. Paragraph 10 of the Agreement (“Section 409A”) is hereby amended by adding the following
sentence to the end thereof:




“If the Grantee is a ‘specified employee’ within the meaning of Code Section 409A as
of the date his employment with the Company terminates prior to January 1, 2009, and
his UARs vest due to his termination, then any UARs exercised by the Grantee during
the six month period commencing on his termination date shall not be paid until the
second day following the end of such six month period (or, if earlier, the date of
Executive’s death).”



1









 





     2. The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and, as amended by this Amendment, is
hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Second Amendment on this 18th day
of December, 2008, with an effective date of December 31, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Stephen A. Snider 	 
	 	 	Chairman of the Board 	 
	 



 





     Grantees are advised to keep a copy of this Notice of Second Amendment with
the Agreement for future reference.




2
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tag Events Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2008


/s/ Artiom Balykin
------------------------------------
Artiom Balykin, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank J. Sansone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





/s/ Frank J. SansoneFrank J. Sansone

Chief Financial Officer

August 15, 2011








[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KASSEM MOHAMMAD SALAMEY,

Petitioner,

 Case No. 09-CV-12201

v.

 HONORABLE DENISE PAGE HOOD

MARY BERGHUIS,

Respondent.

_______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL AND DENYING PETITIONER’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ON APPEAL

Petitioner Kassem Mohammad Salamey has appealed the Court’s dismissal of his habeas

corpus petition. Before the Court is Petitioner’s combined motion for appointment of appellate

counsel and to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. 

Although Petitioner retained counsel for the District Court proceedings, he alleges that his

family has exhausted its resources and cannot afford to retain counsel for his appeal. He also alleges

that he has no assets and is unable to pay the appellate filing fee. 

Petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because an appeal could be taken in

good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The request for appointment of counsel, however, is denied

because the filing of a notice of appeal generally “confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and

divests the district court of control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” Marrese

v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 379 (1985) (citing Griggs v.

Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982 ) (per curiam)). Petitioner has already

filed a notice of appeal. Consequently, the Court lacks jurisdiction to address his request for

2:09-cv-12201-DPH-PJK Doc # 23 Filed 09/30/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1621
2

appointment of counsel. Murray v. Artl, 189 F. App’x 501, 504 (7th Cir. 2006). 

Accordingly,

Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and for the appointment of

counsel (Doc. No. 21, filed September 9, 2011) is granted in part and denied in part. The request

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is granted, but the request for appointment of counsel is

denied.

s/Denise Page Hood 

United States District Judge

Dated: September 30, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

September 30, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-12201-DPH-PJK Doc # 23 Filed 09/30/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1622
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELVIS ALEXANDER SANCHEZ

GALINDO, AKA Elvis Galindo, AKA

Elvis Sanchez, AKA Elvis Alexander

Sanchez, 

Petitioner,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-71006

Agency No. A205-720-056

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2022** 

Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, S.R. THOMAS, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Elvis Alexander Sanchez Galindo, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) to affirm the

FILED

APR 7 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of withholding of removal and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT). We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief. Duran-Rodriguez v.

Barr, 918 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir. 2019). 

To qualify for withholding of removal, Sanchez Galindo has to show that he

experienced or will experience persecution inflicted either by the government or by

an organization that the government is unable or unwilling to control. See

Ornelas-Chavez v. Gonzales, 458 F.3d 1052, 1056 (9th Cir. 2006). To receive

protection under CAT, Sanchez Galindo has to prove that it is more likely than not

that he would be tortured upon his return to Guatemala by or with the acquiescence

of a public official. See id. at 1059.

Sanchez Galindo testified extensively at his immigration hearing, however,

that authorities in Guatemala successfully investigated, prosecuted, and imprisoned

the criminals who were targeting him. In light of the police’s extensive

involvement in protecting Sanchez Galindo from harm, the IJ correctly concluded,

and the BIA properly affirmed, that Sanchez Galindo does not qualify for

withholding of removal or protection under CAT.

The petition is DENIED. 

2
#### Michael P. ROSENTHAL, Respondent/Appellant, v. Joyce A. ROSENTHAL, Petitioner/Respondent.

No. 68558.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 27, 1996.

*872Michael P. Rosenthal, St. Louis, pro se.

John F. Bild, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from the dissolution decree entered on February 28, 1995. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
## NUMBER 13 - 21 - 00 107 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF ANGELICA MARIA HINOJOSA AND JEREMY MATTHEW HINOJOSA

AND IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.H., A CHILD
On appeal from the 94 th District Court of Nueces C ounty, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Longoria , Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina Appellant Jeremy Matthew Hinojosa , proceeding pro se, attempted to perfect an appeal from trial court cause number 2020

- FAM

- 0508

- C in the 94 th District Court of
Nueces County, Texas. On April 22, 2021, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal was defective because it failed to comply with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5(d ) , ( e), 25.1(d)(1 ),(2),(4) , and 25.1(e). See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 9.5(d ) , ( e), 25.1(d)(1 ),(2),(4) , 25.1(e). The Clerk directed appellant to correct his notice of2

appeal within thirty days and advised appellant that the matter would be referred to the Court if appellant failed to comply. See id . R. 37.1 . The Clerk also directed appell ant to pay the filing fee for the appeal within ten days. On June 2, 2021, the Clerk advised appellant that he was delinquent in remitting the filing fee and notified him that the appeal would be dismissed if the fee was not paid within ten days. See id

. R. 42.3(c). That same day, the Clerk also advised appellant that the defects in his notice of appeal had not been corrected and informed him that the appeal would be dismis sed if the defects were not cured within ten days. To date, appellant has not corrected the defects in his notice of appeal, paid the filing fee for the appeal , or otherwise responded to the Clerk’s directives. We are to construe the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure reasonably, yet liberally, so that the right to appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely necessary to effectuate the purpose of a rule. Republic Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Mex

- Tex,
I nc. , 150 S.W.3d 423, 427 (Tex. 2004); Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 616

– 17 (Tex. 1997); Jardon v. Pfister , 593 S.W.3d 810, 820 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2019, no pet.). Nevertheless, th is Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal for “ want of prosecution ”

or “ because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of [ the ] appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b),(c); see Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC , 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2017, no pet.). The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the applicable law, is of the opinion that th is appeal should be dismissed. Accordingly, we3

dismiss th e appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b),(c); Smith , 521 S.W.3d at 76

.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice Delivered and filed on the 22n d day of July , 202 1

.
**Exhibit 10.39**

**PHARMERICA CORPORATION**

**NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN**

*Annual Retainer*: Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer of $35,000. 

*Chairman Retainer*: The non-employee chairman of the Board will receive an additional annual retainer of $15,000 per year. 

*Committee Chair Retainer*: The chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000. Thechairman of the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000. The chairman of the Audit Committee receive an additional annual retainer of $10,000. 

*Board Meeting Fee*: Non-employee directors will receive $2,000 for each meeting of the board attended. 

*Committee Meeting Fee*: Non-employee committee members will receive $1,500 for each committee meeting attended. 

*Initial Stock Option Grant*: Upon joining the board of directors, each non-employee director will receive a one-time award of stock options valuedat $120,000. Such stock options will vest in three equal annual installments. 

*Annual Restricted Stock Grant*: Each non-employeedirector will receive an annual award of restricted stock valued at $80,000. Such restricted stock will vest in three equal annual installments. 

*Exceptions*: Directors Paul J. Diaz and R. David Yost agreed not to receive any compensation for their board service.
Exhibit 32.2


 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Scientific
Asset Holding, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Shirley Louie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 13, 2008


/s/ Shirley Louie
--------------------------------
Shirley Louie
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

22