alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tag Events Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2008


/s/ Crescent Liu
----------------------------------
Crescent Liu, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)


/s/ Artiom Balykin
----------------------------------
Artiom Balykin
Principal Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
No. 99-60634 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60634 Summary Calendar

TRACY GAMBRELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GRAND CASINOS OF MISSISSIPPI, INC. - BILOXI, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:98-CV-206-RG

-------------------- April 27, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Tracy Gambrell appeals the magistrate judge’s order dismissing as time-barred her sex discrimination claims against Grand Casino of Mississippi, Inc. because Gambrell failed to file her charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission within the requisite 180 days. The 180-day period begins from the “‘date of notice of termination, rather than the final date of employment.’” Clark v. Resistoflex Co. , 854 F.2d 762, 765 (5th Cir. 1988) (citations omitted). In determining when the employee received notice, courts employ an objective standard,No. 99-60634 -2- “focusing upon when the employee knew, or reasonably should have known, that the adverse employment decision had been made.” Id. The magistrate judge determined that Gambrell knew she had been terminated from her position as a valet due to pregnancy on June 12, 1997, when she was sent home by her supervisor and told she would need to be transferred to another position. However, deciding to transfer a pregnant employee for safety reasons is not necessarily a discriminatory act. See Levin v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. , 730 F.2d 994, 997-98 (5th Cir. 1984). Moreover, Gambrell was told she would be placed in another position. Thus, she was not necessarily aware on that date of an adverse employment action. There is substantial conflicting evidence regarding when Gambrell learned that she would not be rehired. Although Grand places much emphasis on Gambrell’s statement in her EEOC charge and her complaint that she was terminated in June 1997, the EEOC’s internal investigation memorandum and the testimony of Grand’s own employees demonstrate that at no time in June 1997 was Gambrell ever told she would not be rehired due to her pregnancy. Accordingly, we find that there are genuine issues of material fact regarding when Gambrell knew or reasonably should have known that the allegedly discriminatory decision not to rehire her occurred. For similar reasons, we find that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether Gambrell reasonably believed that Grand was actively pursuing another position for her such that the 180-day period would have been equitably tolled untilNo. 99-60634 -3- Gambrell discovered she would not be rehired. See Cocke v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. , 817 F.2d 1559, 1561 (11th Cir. 1987). We, therefore, vacate the grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit
31.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
G. Brent Backman, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer, certify
that:





1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-a5(e)) for the
small business issuer and have;





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure the material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or person performing the
equivalent functions);





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process
summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over
financial reporting.







Date:  May
14, 2008


/s/ G. Brent
Backman


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3848 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3848

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to include removal of graffiti 
       within the meaning of transportation enhancement activity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 1996

  Mr. Borski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to include removal of graffiti 
       within the meaning of transportation enhancement activity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That the last undesignated paragraph of section 101(a) of title 23, 
United States Code, (relating to transportation enhancement activities) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Such term includes 
removal of graffiti from a highway, from a transit facility, and from 
any building or other facility owned by the United States or a State or 
local government if the graffiti is visible from a highway or transit 
facility.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chuma Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Paul Shively, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                                                          
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





|    |                                                                                                                                       
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.





|                       |     |                                               | 
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------- | 
|                       |     |                                               | 
|Date: October 30, 2014 | By: | /s/ Paul Shively                              | 
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer, Chuma Holdings, Inc. |
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3996

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish false statements during

debate on the floor of either House of Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish false

statements during debate on the floor of either House

of Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Integrity in Congress

5 Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3996 IH

1 SEC. 2. FALSE STATEMENTS DURING CONGRESSIONAL DE2 BATE.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 47 of title 18, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing:

6 ‘‘§ 1035. False statements during Congressional de7 bate

8 ‘‘Whoever, being a Senator or Representative, know9 ingly makes any false statement during any speech or de10 bate in either House of Congress shall be fined not more

11 than $10,000.’’.

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

13 at the beginning of chapter 47 of title 18, United States

14 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

15 item:

‘‘1035. False statements during Congressional debate.’’.

16 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING SUSPENSION OF

17 FLOOR PRIVILEGES.

18 It is the sense of Congress that any Senator or Rep19 resentative who knowingly or willfully makes any false

20 statement during any speech or debate in either House

21 of Congress should be prohibited from participating in any

22 speech or debate in Congress for a 60-day period.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 150 (Monday, August 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XJ45


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Skate Committee in August, 2008 to 
consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive 
economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to 
the full Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Monday, August 25, 2008, at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn, One Newbury 
Street, Peabody, MA 01960: telephone: (978) 535-4600; fax: (978) 535-
8238.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Committee will review and finalize the 
Draft Amendment 3 document, which is scheduled for public hearings in 
October. The Plan Development Team (PDT) will also recommend a 
rebuilding schedule and plan for smooth skate that NMFS recently 
determined has become overfished. Amendment 3 proposes catch limits, 
time/area closures, and possession limits to reduce skate landings and 
mortality to levels that are consistent with rebuilding smooth, thorny 
and winter skate biomass while preventing overfishing.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: July 29, 2008.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E8-17734 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
Exhibit
10.33


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


 


TO


 


THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.


PERFORMANCE AWARD PROGRAM


 


 


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of The Ryland Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”), pursuant to its power and
authority to amend the Performance Award Program (“Award Program”), amends the
Award Program effective as of January 1, 2005, to confirm that the Plan is
exempt from the requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code as a
short-term deferral program described under Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(b)(4).


 


Accordingly, the Award Program is amended by adding
the following sentence to the end of the Section titled “Distribution of
Performance Awards”:


 


“Notwithstanding anything in the Award Program to
the contrary, all payments of performance awards shall be made to Participants within
two and one-half months following the end of year during which the participant
becomes vested in the performance award.”


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 has been duly
executed by the Corporation, effective as of January 1, 2005.


 


 


	
  ATTEST/WITNESS 

  	
   

  	
  THE
  RYLAND GROUP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ____________________________________________________

  	
   

  	
  By:________________________________________________

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Print Name:__________________________________________

  	
   

  	
  Print Name:_________________________________________

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:______________________________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3918 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3918

    To amend title 5, United States Code, to treat employees of the 
Government of the District of Columbia in the same manner as employees 
  of State and local governments are treated for the purposes of the 
                               Hatch Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 1996

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 5, United States Code, to treat employees of the 
Government of the District of Columbia in the same manner as employees 
  of State and local governments are treated for the purposes of the 
                               Hatch Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLITICAL ACTIVITY OF EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) Treatment as a State.--(1) Section 1501(1) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting ``, the District of Columbia,'' 
after ``State''.
    (2) Section 1501(4) of such title is amended--
            (A) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses 
        (i) and (ii), respectively;
            (B) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(4)''; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A), a payment by 
        the United States to the District of Columbia pursuant to 
        section 503 of the District of Columbia Self-Government and 
        Governmental Reorganization Act is not financing in whole or in 
        part by a loan or grant.''.
    (3) Section 1502(c) of such title is amended--
            (A) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (3);
            (B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (4) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) the Recorder of Deeds of the District of Columbia.''.
    (b) Federal Employees.--Section 7322(1) of such title is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B); and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C).
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 717(b) of the District of 
Columbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganization Act (Sec. 1-
208, D.C. Code) is amended by striking ``, except that'' and all that 
follows through the end and inserting a period.
                                 <all>
```
#### Scot ELLRICK, Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant.

No. WD 41768.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 1, 1990.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jatha B. Sadowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for appellant.

Scot Ellrick, Kansas City, pro se.

Before NUGENT, C.J., FENNER, J., and WASSERSTROM, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The Director of Revenue appeals from an order reinstating the driving privileges of Scot Ellrick. We reverse and remand.

The Director mailed a notice dated September 30, 1988, notifying Mr. Ellrick that effective November 12, 1988, the Director would revoke his driving privileges for one year for failure to submit to chemical testing as set forth in § 577.041, R.S.Mo., 1986. On January 11, 1989, Mr. Ellrick filed his petition for review, seeking to set aside the revocation of his driver’s license. The trial court issued a temporary stay of the revocation on January 18, 1989, and on February 9, 1989, ordered permanent reinstatement of all of Mr. Ellrick’s driving privileges. In response, the Director moved to set aside the permanent order for lack of jurisdiction.

On appeal, the Director contends that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain Mr. Ellrick’s petition for review because of its untimely filing. In support, the Director cites § 302.311 R.S. Mo., 1986, which requires filing of an appeal of a revocation of driving privileges within thirty days after notice of revocation. The record reveals that Mr. Ellrick filed his petition over one hundred days after notification of revocation of his driving privileges.

In *Romans v. Director of Revenue,*783 S.W.2d 894 (Mo.1990) (en banc) the appellant raised the identical issue. Reading the statutes in pari materia, the Missouri Supreme Court held that a thirty-day time limit of § 302.311 applies to revocations under § 577.041. *Id.*at 896. Therefore, the petitioner must file his petition within thirty days of notice of revocation. *Id.*

Here, Mr. Ellrick’s revocation resulted from failure to submit to the chemical testing required by § 577.041; he filed his peti*909tion for review well beyond the thirty-day time limit imposed by § 302.311. The untimely filing deprived the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction and renders its judgment void. *Id.; accord Bales v. Director of Revenue,*786 S.W.2d 184, 185 (Mo.App., W.D.1990); *Griffitt v. Director of Revenue,*786 S.W.2d 183, 184 (Mo.App., W.D.1990).

Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand with directions to dismiss the petition.
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE
ACT RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph B. Sherk, certify that:

1.       I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Steel Connect, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2019;
and

2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.

Dated: November 26, 2019

|By: | /s/ Joseph B. Sherk           
|--- | ------------------------------
|    | Joseph B. Sherk               
|    | Chief Accounting Officer      
|    | (Principal Accounting Officer)