alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3854 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3854

  To authorize the reburial in the Memorial Amphitheater at Arlington 
National Cemetery of two unknown Americans who lost their lives during 
the Civil War, one while serving in the Union Army of the United States 
 and the other while serving in the Army of the Confederate States of 
                    America, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 1996

  Mr. Kasich introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the reburial in the Memorial Amphitheater at Arlington 
National Cemetery of two unknown Americans who lost their lives during 
the Civil War, one while serving in the Union Army of the United States 
 and the other while serving in the Army of the Confederate States of 
                    America, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REBURIAL OF UNKNOWN SOLDIERS FROM CIVIL WAR IN THE MEMORIAL 
              AMPHITHEATER OF ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY.

    The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to cause to be 
brought from a National Cemetery for burial in the Memorial 
Amphitheater of the National Cemetery at Arlington, Virginia, the 
remains of--
            (1) an American who was a member of the Union Army of the 
        United States, who served in the Civil War of 1861 through 1865 
        who lost his life during the Civil War, and whose identity has 
        not been established; and
            (2) an American who was a member of the Army of the 
        Confederate States of America, who served in the Civil War of 
        1861 through 1865 who lost his life during the Civil War, and 
        whose identity has not been established.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered February 14, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00 965
- CR
ANTWAUNN DISMUKE , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F1 3
- 51584
- U



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeal. On November 20, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the clerk’s and reporter’s records had not been filed. We have not received the findings or the
clerk’s rec ord. We have received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, this is now the order of the Court.
We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this appeal
within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of t his order.
We ORDER court reporter Peri K. Wood to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit nos. 1 and 2, DVDs.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Pe ri K.

Wood, official court reporter, 291st Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Exhibit 23 (b)

                         Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP


The Board of Directors
Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc.

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated February 4, 1997, included in Southern Financial Bancorp,
Inc.'s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, and to all
references to our Firm included in this Form 10-K. It should be noted
that we have not audited any financial statements of Southern Financial
Bancorp, Inc. subsequent to December 31, 1996, or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to the date of our report.




Arthur Andersen LLP
Washington, D. C.
March 30, 1998



<PAGE>



                    Report of Independent Public Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition
of Southern Financial Bancorp, Inc. (a Virginia corporation) as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in stockholders'equity and cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 1996, for the six months ended December 31, 1995,
and for the year ended June 30, 1995. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Bancorp's management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Southern
Financial Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1996, for the six months ended December 31, 1995, and for
the year ended June 30, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.


Arthur Andersen LLP
Washington, D. C.
February 4, 1997
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Patent No. 6,704,460 entitled “Remote mosaic imaging system having high-resolution, wide field-of-view and low bandwidth,” issued on March 9, 2004. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention. 

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Research Development and Engineering Command, ATTN: AMSRD-AMR-AS-PT-TR, Bldg.  5400, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898-5000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Russ Alexander, Office of Research & Technology Applications, (256) 876-8743. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The present invention uses image frame synchronization and multiplexing to reduce the bandwidth needed to transmit the plurality of images to a remote location. The use of readily available and inexpensive commercial imaging sensors significantly decreases the cost while increasing the capabilities. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E8-1747 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HAROLD DEAN ROBERTS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LOUISIANA HOMES, et al

Defendants.

/

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-11066

DISTRICT JUDGE AVERN COHN

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

 AND 

MOTION TO AMEND DISCOVERY WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Before the Court are the plaintiff’s Motion for Discovery (D/E 6) and Motion to

Amend Discovery (D/E 8). To date the defendants have not been served with the

complaint in this matter and thus motions have been filed prematurely. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The motions may be renewed after a responsive pleading has been filed by the defendants.

Dated: April 15, 2009 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Harold Dean

Roberts, Jr, 25225 Greenfield, Apartment 422, Southfield, MI 48237 on this date, April

15, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-11066-AC-VMM Doc # 11 Filed 04/15/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 69
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance  sheet and the  consolidated  statement of income filed as
part of the report on Form 10-KSB and is  qualified in its entirety by reference
to such report on Form 10-KSB.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                              0000915127
<NAME>                             PHC, Inc
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<CURRENCY>                         US

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1.000
<CASH>                             381,170
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      10,586,075
<ALLOWANCES>                       3,647,848
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   7,673,214
<PP&E>                             2,474,595
<DEPRECIATION>                     991,276
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     15,027,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              9,484,495
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        8
<COMMON>                           63,401
<OTHER-SE>                         3,197,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       15,027,434
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   19,139,496
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      19,691,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   2,183,139
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 1,258,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (1,294,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                       59,434
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (1,354,086)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
 <EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (1,354,086)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.25)




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q (the “Report”) of HARRY’S TRUKING, INC.. (the “Company”) for the quarterended June 30, 2008, Haris Tajyar, the President and CFO of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’sknowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                                                              /s/Haris Tajyar

Date: August 13, 2008

 Haris Tajyar, President and CFO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ALERIS ALUMINUM CANADA L.P., 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

vs. 

VALEO, INC., 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. 

Case No. 09-cv-10490 

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan 

_____________________________________________________________________________/ 

Order Granting Valeo, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Aleris Aluminum Canada L.P.’s 

Affirmative Defense No. 14 Regarding Aleris’s Canadian Bankruptcy Case 

 

THIS MATTER having been heard on Valeo’s Motion to Strike Aleris’s Affirmative 

Defense No. 14 Regarding Aleris’s Canadian Bankruptcy Case (“Motion to Strike”); the Court 

having read the briefs and heard oral arguments of the parties; and the Court having announced 

its ruling and the reasons therefor from the bench at a hearing held on December 3, 2009: 

IT IS ORDERED that Valeo’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defense No. 14 from 

Aleris’s Answer to Valeo’s Counterclaim is GRANTED. This ruling concerns only the current 

pleadings and does not address whether Aleris may assert such a defense if Valeo is allowed to 

amend its counterclaims to add new counts. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Aleris has preserved its right to argue that any amounts 

determined to be owed by Aleris to Valeo cannot, under applicable law, be setoff against any 

amounts determined to be owed by Valeo to Aleris. The Court has not ruled on the merits of this 

issue. 

2:09-cv-10490-PJD-RSW Doc # 36 Filed 12/11/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 453
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Valeo obtains a money judgment in its favor in this 

action and the Court does not permit Valeo to recoup or setoff the amount of such judgment 

against any outstanding accounts payable to Aleris, or if the amount of such judgment exceeds 

the amount of any outstanding accounts payable to Aleris, Aleris has preserved its right to argue 

that Valeo must pursue collection in Aleris’ Canadian Bankruptcy proceeding. The Court has 

not ruled on the merits of this issue. 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: December 11, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of 

record on December 11, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

Approved as to form: 

 /s/ Daniel W. Linna Jr. 

Daniel W. Linna Jr. (P68863) 

HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND COHN LLP 

Attorneys for Defendant 

2290 First National Building 

660 Woodward Avenue 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

313-465-7500 

dlinna@honigman.com 

 /s/ Sarah C. Lindsey (w/ permission) 

Sarah C. Lindsey (P68544) 

WARNER NORCROSS & JUDD LLP 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

2000 Town Center, Suite 2700 

Southfield, Michigan 48075 

248-784-5147 

slindsey@wnj.com 

DETROIT.3982412 

2:09-cv-10490-PJD-RSW Doc # 36 Filed 12/11/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 454
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

KAREN M. KEYS, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 09-11105

ARKEMA INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL,

 DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER,

 AND EXTENDING CERTAIN DISCOVERY DEADLINES

Before the court are Plaintiffs’ motion to compel, filed August 20, 2009, and

Defendant’s motion for protective order, filed August 25, 2009. On August 25, 2009, the

court conducted an on-the-record telephone conference in the above-captioned case. 

During the telephone conference, the court and counsel discussed Plaintiffs’ pending

motion to compel and Defendant’s pending motion for protective order. By agreement

of the parties and for the reasons stated on the record,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s compel [Dkt. # 15] is GRANTED to the extent that

Defendant will produce the schedule from the purchase agreement, consisting of a

spreadsheet of employee data, in which dates of birth of employees are not redacted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court’s May 1, 2009 scheduling order is

extended to permit depositions of two individuals in Philadelphia to be conducted on

2:09-cv-11105-RHC-PJK Doc # 19 Filed 08/26/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 141
1

 The court also expects that the deposition of the witness located in Michigan will

be conducted within one week of this order as represented to the court by counsel

during the telephone conference. 

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\09-11105.KEYS.Discovery.Protective.Order.Depositions.ljd.wpd

2

September 15, 2009 and September 16, 2009,1

 and to extend the deadline for

dispositive motions to October 2, 2009. 

Finally, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for protective order [Dkt. # 18]

is DENIED AS MOOT. 

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 26, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, August 26, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa G. Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-11105-RHC-PJK Doc # 19 Filed 08/26/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 142
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

WILLIAM KAUFMAN, RELATOR, PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, INTERESTED
PARTY,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA; JANE CULTER [SIC] GREENSPAN, LAZARUS, KEOGH, SMITH, DAVIS, STACK,

EDWARD G. MEKEL (DISTRICT COURT JUDGE(S)); LYNN ABRAHAM, MARK GILSON, RAYMOND J. HARLEY, ARLENE FISK, CHARLES F. GALLADHER (DA/ADA/PROSECUTOR); VIVIAN T. MILLER (CLERK OF COURT); JANET FASEY [SIC] DOWDS, KEVIN FLANAGAN (OFFICERS OF THE COURT); AARON BOOKER#795, MIC HAEL MORAM#0183, MICHAEL LOGUE#6913, HERBERTO APONTE#259, DOREEN NAPPER#1217, JOHN SPIESER#7169, CHARLES LAYTON#9942, JOE RUFF#5040, JOSEPH GLOVACZ#6607, MANUEL PEREZ#4729, DORIS WASTON#7195, BEVERLY GRAHAM#3026, D. BAKER#612, DET. JULIE HILL, OSCAR JONES# 9171, ANTHONY TOMAINO#610, STG. COMPLONE#569, SGT. COULTER, DET. HARKIDS, DET. C. BROWN, LT. M. FISHER#417, DET. MAMGONI, KONCZYK#8030, SGT. JOHN THORN#493, REDANAVER#5833, SGT. F. CORSINO#8826, P/O. TAGGART#1888 (DETECTIVE(S)/POLICEMEN/OFFICER(S)),

Re spondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 58 EM 2018ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of August , 2018

, the Application for Leave to File Original

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief

is DENIED.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
To Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
33-90926 on Form S-8 of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. of our report dated March
10, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Great Lakes Aviation,
Ltd. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, the related statements
of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows, and related financial
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 Form 10-K of
Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.

                                    KPMG LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
April 10, 2000
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DION NEAL,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-12859

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

MICHAEL NOWACK,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17]

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s July 9, 2010

Report and Recommendation, [Docket Text # 17.]. Being fully advised in the premises and

having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including Plaintiff’s Objections if any, the

Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation. 

It is further ordered that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED,

and the case is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: August 19, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on August 19, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager