alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer
Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Ying He, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 10, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Ying HeYing
      HeChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3834

To redesignate the Dunning Post Office in Chicago, Illinois, as the ‘‘Roger

P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 1996

Mr. FLANAGAN (for himself, Mrs. COLLINS of Illinois, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr.

CRANE, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. EVANS, Mr. EWING, Mr. FAWELL, Mr.

GUTIERREZ, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. HYDE, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr.

LAHOOD, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. PORTER,

Mr. POSHARD, Mr. RUSH, Mr. WELLER, and Mr. YATES) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To redesignate the Dunning Post Office in Chicago, Illinois,

as the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Dunning Post Office, located at 6441 West Ir5 ving Park Road, Chicago, Illinois, shall be redesignated

6 and known as the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.
2

•HR 3834 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office’’.

Æ
#### Ellen O. KNOX and John J. Knox, Jr., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, v. John A. HARTWIG, Jr., Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

No. 65906.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Sept. 26, 1995.

*906James E. Dealing, Dealing & Hartzog, Clayton, for appellants.

Richard J. Magee, Daniel J. McAuliffe, Clayton, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and GRIMM, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Both petitioners, Ellen 0. Knox and John J. Knox, Jr., and respondent, John A. Hart-wig, Jr., appeal the judgment of the trial court on objections to the final settlement in the estate of Ann Knickmeyer, deceased.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32(a)


                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that
the accompanying Form 10-K of Southwest Bancorp, Inc. ("Southwest") for the
annual period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and that the information contained in this Form 10-K fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Southwest.


By: /s/ Rick Green                                   March 14, 2005
    --------------------------------------           ---------------------------
    Rick Green                                       Date
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 395 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 256
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 395

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 6, 1995

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be 
 constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia 
   Streets in Reno, Nevada, as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse and Federal building to be constructed 
at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia Streets in 
Reno, Nevada, is designated as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the courthouse and Federal building 
referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Bruce R. 
Thompson United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 5, 1995.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Linda Nave,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 256

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be 
 constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia 
   Streets in Reno, Nevada, as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 6, 1995

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-63,648] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on July 8, 2008 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Hanesbrands Inc., Oak Summit Division, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TA-W-61,962A) which expires on September 13, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC,  this 28th day of July 2008. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8-17888 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Shari ESTES, Defendant/Appellant. Shari ESTES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 66972, 69683.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 20, 1996.

Judith C. LaRose, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jill C. LaHue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD and REINHARD, P.JJ., and GARY M. GAERTNER, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of stealing $150 or more, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Defendant addresses no points on appeal to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief; that appeal is considered abandoned. *See State v. Nelson,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.1991). We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error on direct appeal are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[No. 33790.

Department One.

May 2, 1957.]

#### Ethel S. Welliever, *Appellant,*v. Alexander C. MacNulty *et al., Respondents.**1*

*Cashatt & Williams*and *James P. Connelly,*for appellant.

*John D. MacGillivray*and *Willard W. Jones,*for respondents.

1

Reported in 310 P. (2d) 531.

Per Curiam.

This appeal involves a factual issue. The evidence with reference to it was conflicting. The jury determined the issue in favor of the respondents. The jury is the sole judge of the facts. *Arthurs v. National Postal Transport Ass'n,*49 Wn. (2d) 570, 577, 304 P. (2d) 685, and case cited.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Across America Real Estate Exchange,
Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. G. Brent Backman, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.




Date:  AUGUST
19, 2008
 /s/ G. Brent
Backman
 Chief
Executive Officer
 Chief
Financial Officer
PATRICK CANNELLA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1893

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 13, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Terry P. Lewis, Judge.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY and MAKAR, JJ., and DAVIS, WILLIAM E., ASSOCIATE JUDGE,

CONCUR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DELAWARE CAPITAL FORMATION, ) 

INC., and CPI PRODUCTS, INC., ) Case No. 5:09-CV-12745-JCO-MKM 

a Delaware corporation, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) Hon. John Corbett O’Meara 

 ) Hon. Mona K. Majzoub 

v. ) 

 ) 

NORGREN AUTOMATION ) 

SOLUTIONS, INC., ) 

a Delaware corporation, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

George T. Schooff (P45596) 

David P. Utykanski (P47029) 

HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. 

5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200 

Troy, Michigan 48098 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Todd L. Moore (P45472) 

Marshall G. MacFarlane (P27296) 

Craig A. Redinger (P68794) 

Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C. 

301 East Liberty Street, Suite 680 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 

Attorneys for Defendant 

__________________________________________________/ 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR A STAY OF THE PROCEEDINGS TO FACILITATE 

SETTLEMENT

Case 5:09-cv-12745-JCO-MKM Document 59 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 2
2

I. GROUNDS FOR RELIEF 

 Plaintiffs Delaware Capital Formation, Inc. and CPI Products, Inc. and Defendant 

Norgren Automation Solutions Inc. have come to an agreement in principle regarding settlement 

of the above-noted matter. In order to facilitate the drafting and approval of a settlement 

agreement, the parties are requesting a stay of the proceedings. The stay should include all 

discovery motions and court docketed matters, including the Claim Construction hearing 

scheduled for August 5, 2010, and the Motion to Compel hearing scheduled for August 4, 2010. 

 In the event that the parties are unable to agree on a final settlement agreement, the 

parties will notify and request this Court to lift the stay and reinstitute the proceedings. If a final 

settlement agreement is executed, the case will be disposed of accordingly. 

II. STIPULATION 

The parties hereby stipulate to entry of the below order. 

s/with consent of George T. Schooff 

. 

George T. Schooff (P45596) 

HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C. 

5445 Corporate Drive, Suite 200 

Troy, Michigan 48098 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Dated: July 29, 2010 

s/Todd L. Moore 

.

Todd L. Moore (P45472) 

Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane, P.C. 

301 East Liberty Street, Suite 680 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Dated: July 29, 2010 

III. ORDER 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-noted case is stayed to facilitate settlement. 

Date: August 5, 2010 s/John Corbett O’Meara

 United States District Judge 

Case 5:09-cv-12745-JCO-MKM Document 59 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 2
-1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROSE MARY MILES-RICHARDSON, Case No. 09-11275

Plaintiff, District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff

v. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff Rose Mary Miles-Richardson has submitted an application for

appointment of counsel [Docket #3] in this Social Security Disability appeal. Unlike

criminal cases, there is no constitutional or statutory right to the appointment of counsel

in civil cases. Rather, the Court requests members of the bar to assist in appropriate

cases. In Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 605-606 (6th Cir. 1993), the Sixth Circuit

noted that “[a]ppointment of counsel in a civil case is not a constitutional right. It is a

privilege that is justified only by exceptional circumstances.” (Internal quotations and

citations omitted).

The Court has by separate order granted Ms. Miles-Richardson in forma pauperis

(IFP) status, permitting her to proceed without prepayment of fees, and has also ordered

that her complaint be served by the United States Marshal. Following service, the

Defendant Commissioner will file an answer, along with the administrative record, and

2:09-cv-11275-LPZ-RSW Doc # 5 Filed 04/24/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 10
-2-

the Court will set a schedule for the filing of briefs. At this time, however, it does not

appear that this case presents exceptional circumstances that would compel the

appointment of counsel. Ms. Miles-Richardson will be afforded some latitude in how she

composes her written arguments, and indeed, the Court will permit her to submit a

narrative letter explaining why she thinks the Commissioner made the wrong decision,

and why she thinks she is entitled to benefits. In deciding the case, the Court will also

independently review the administrative record.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s application for appointment of counsel [Docket #3] is

DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

S/R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: April 24, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served on the attorneys

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on April 24, 2009.

S/G. Wilson 

Judicial Assistant

2:09-cv-11275-LPZ-RSW Doc # 5 Filed 04/24/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 11
- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL BAILEY

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 014249, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov)

MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov)

PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov) 

ANDREW C. STONE (Ariz. Bar No. 026543, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov)

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

DAN G. BOYLE (N.Y. Bar No. 5216825, daniel.boyle2@usdoj.gov) 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

312 N. Spring Street, Suite 1400 Los Angeles, CA 90012

Telephone (213) 894-2426

BRIAN C. RABBITT 

Assistant Attorney General 

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov)

Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO 

CONFIRM TRIAL SUBPOENAS

The United States respectfully requests the Court to confirm the trial subpoenas 

issued to all witnesses for the previous jury trial dates of May 5, 2020, August 17, 2020, 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1069 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and January 12, 2021, to remain in effect for the current jury trial set for April 12, 2021.

Respectfully submitted this 13th day of October, 2020.

MICHAEL BAILEY

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

s/ Kevin M. Rapp KEVIN M. RAPP

MARGARET PERLMETER

PETER S. KOZINETS

ANDREW C. STONE

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

DAN G. BOYLE

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

BRIAN C. RABBIT

Assistant Attorney General 

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

REGINALD E. JONES

Senior Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this same date, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

s/ Joy Faraj . U.S. Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1069 Filed 10/13/20 Page 2 of 2
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blue Earth Solutions, Inc. for the      quarter ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Blue Earth Solutions,      Inc. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |  /s/ Patricia      Cohen                       |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Patricia      Cohen                           |
|  Title: |  Principal      Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  February      17, 2009                        |

|  By:    |  /s/ Paul      Slusarczyk                      |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Paul      Slusarczyk                          |
|  Title: |  Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  February      17, 2009                        |
#### In re the MARRIAGE OF Lynne C. DUDLEY and Jerry L. Dudley. Lynne C. DUDLEY, Respondent, v. Jerry L. DUDLEY, Appellant.

No. 69465.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Northern Division.

Oct. 29, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Audrain County; Edward D. Hodge, Judge.

Edward Rex Bradley, Louisiana, for appellant.

James D. Terrell, Hannibal, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, C.J., and DOWD and HOFF, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerry L. Dudley (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s order awarding primary custody of their two children to Lynne C. Dudley (“Mother”) and granting her the marital residence. We affirm.

Mother initially claims that Father’s brief does not comport with Rule 84.04(d), in that the Points Relied On fail to state why the trial court’s ruling was error and wherein the evidence mandated a different result. We agree. Rule 84.04(d). See *Thummel v. King,*570 S.W.2d 679 (Mo.banc 1978). We have, *ex gratia,*reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find both claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



Conso Products Company

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-20671, 33-97146 and
33-85518) of our report dated September 5, 1997 incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conso Products Company for the fiscal year ended
June 28, 1997.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Greenville, South Carolina
September 16, 1997