alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2008, and for the period then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT    
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|August 5, 2008         
|                       
|/s/ BRYAN PEERY        
|Bryan Peery            
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 5, 2008         



33
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Roderick MAXIE, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65739.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 19, 1995.

Emmett D. Queener, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his convictions by a jury of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced in accordance with the jury’s assessment to prison terms of ten years and five year respectively; the sentences were ordered to run consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
IB

Union Calendar No. 459

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3874

[Report No. 104–846]

To reauthorize the United States Commission on Civil Rights, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 23, 1996

Mr. CANADY of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To reauthorize the United States Commission on Civil

Rights, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Commis5 sion Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3874 RH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS.

3 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 6 of the Civil Rights Com4 mission Act of 1986 1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975d) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘1996’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.

6 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—(1) The first sentence of sec7 tion 5 of the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42

8 U.S.C. 1975c) is amended to read ‘‘There are authorized

9 to be appropriated to carry out this Act $8,750,000 for

10 fiscal year 1997.’’.

11 (2) The second sentence of section 5 of the Civil

12 Rights Commission Act of 1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975c) is

13 amended by striking ‘‘1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1997’’.

14 SEC. 3. SUBPOENAS.

15 Section 3(e)(2) of the Civil Rights Act of 1983 (42

16 U.S.C. 1975a) is amended by inserting ‘‘, by a majority

17 vote of those present and voting’’ before ‘‘issue subpoe18 nas’’.

19 SEC. 4. STAFF DIRECTOR.

20 Section 4(a) of the Civil Rights Commission Act of

21 1983 (42 U.S.C. 1975b(a)) is amended by adding at the

22 end the following:

23 ‘‘(3) REMOVAL OF STAFF DIRECTOR.—The

24 Commission may, by a majority vote of the Commis25 sion, remove the staff director from office.’’.
3

•HR 3874 RH

1 SEC. 5. APPLICATION OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION, PRI2 VACY, AND SUNSHINE ACTS.

3 Section 4 of the Civil Rights Commission Act of 1983

4 (42 U.S.C. 1975b) is amended by adding at the end the

5 following:

6 ‘‘(f) APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF

7 LAW.—The Commission shall be included in the term

8 ‘‘agency’’ ‘agency’ as such term is defined for the purposes

9 of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 5, United States

10 Code.’’.
Union Calendar No. 459

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3874

[Report No. 104–846]

A BILL

To reauthorize the United States Commission on

Civil Rights, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 26, 1996

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee

dered to be printedof the Whole House on the State of the Union, and or-
Exhibit 4.20

 

April 16, 2014

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.T.

Washington, DC 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have read Item 16F of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 dated April 16, 2014 of Sinovac Biotech Ltd. and are in agreement with the statements contained in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Item 16F. We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Vancouver, Canada
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PHILLIP HERNDON,

Petitioner,

Civil Action No. 2:09-12213

v. Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

CINDI CURTAIN,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTIONS

FOR EQUITABLE TOLLING AND TO SUPPLEMENT

At a session of said Court, held in the

U.S. District Courthouse, Eastern District

of Michigan on July 1, 2009.

PRESENT: HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for equitable tolling to allow

him to proceed on his petition for writ of habeas corpus as timely filed under the one-year

statute of limitations applicable to federal habeas actions, as well as his motion to

supplement that pleading with a psychological report (which he has not attached). 

Respondent has not yet filed an answer to the habeas petition, nor has Respondent

submitted the relevant state court record. Those materials are due on December 14, 2009. 

Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice Petitioner’s motions for equitable

tolling and to supplement that motion. The Court shall consider the timeliness of the

petition once Respondent’s answer is filed. Petitioner need not file another motion

2:09-cv-12213-PJD-CEB Doc # 7 Filed 07/01/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 132
2

concerning this issue, although he may respond to any statute of limitations defense raised

by Respondent in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court’s

Local Rules.

SO ORDERED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copy to:

Phillip Herndon, #231404

Oaks Correctional Facility

1500 Caberfae Highway

Manistee, MI 49660

2:09-cv-12213-PJD-CEB Doc # 7 Filed 07/01/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 133
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.3
                                                                    ------------
I, John E. Parker, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of A.C. Moore
Arts & Crafts, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date: April 26, 2006

                                       By:  /s/ John E. Parker
                                            ------------------------------
                                            John E. Parker
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            (principal executive officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 33-72970, No. 33-82452, No. 33-93092, No. 333-18407 and No.
333-21587) pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan, 1990 Stock Option Plan,
1993 Employee Qualified Stock Purchase Plan, 1992 Key Executive Stock Option
Plan, 1994 Outside Director Stock Option Plan, 1996 Supplemental Stock Plan
and SpeedSim, Inc. 1995 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, and in
the Registration Statement (Form S3, No. 333-22907) of our report dated
January 16, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Quickturn Design Systems, Inc. as of December
31, 1996 and 1995, and for the three years in the period ended December 31,
1996, which report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

                                    /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

San Jose, California
March 26, 1997
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAMS INTERNATIONAL CO., LLC,

Plaintiff,

v.

NEW WEST MACHINE TOOL CORP.,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-12516

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

[10]

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to stay proceedings in this

action until the United States District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division, has an

opportunity to consider a motion to dismiss or stay in the action filed in that Court by

Defendant against Plaintiff. The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are

adequately presented and that the decision process would not be significantly aided by oral

argument. Therefore, pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), it is

hereby ORDERED that the motion be resolved as submitted. 

On September 29, 2009, Plaintiff submitted a notice informing the Court that the

United States District Court for the District of Utah had issued a memorandum decision and

order staying the Utah action pending a decision from this Court on Plaintiff’s motion to

compel arbitration, which is currently pending before the Court. Accordingly, there is no

reason for a stay of this action, and Defendant’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT. 

2:09-cv-12516-NGE-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 10/08/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 451
2

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: October 8, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on October 8, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

 

2:09-cv-12516-NGE-MJH Doc # 20 Filed 10/08/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 452
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.70


 


 Accounts Receivable
Confirmation


 


Contract No.: ABC(2012)1011-8
2013100905                       





 


Pledgor : Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., Ltd


 


Pledgee
: Agricultural Bank of China, Shijiazhuang North City Branch


 


Signing Date :October 9, 2013


 


Pledge Definition :   To ensure multiple loans Party
B (Pledgee) has lent to Shijie Kaiyuan Auto Trade Co., Ltd., Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide Accounts Receivable hereunder
for Party B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB111,164,560


 


Pledge Term
: From October 9, 2013 to March 16, 2014


 


Collateral: The assets Party A pledges to Party B as Collateral
are listed in Accounts Receivable List (No. ABC(2012)1011-7 2013082903). The appraised value of the Collateral is RMB 111,164,560
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Lucky Strike
Explorations Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Michael Noble, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2008                By: /s/ Michael Noble
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael Noble
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4133

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at the corner

of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ‘‘Carl B.

Stokes United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1996

Mr. LATOURETTE (for himself, Mr. STOKES, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. REGULA, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. OBERSTAR, and Mr. MASCARA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed

at the corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ‘‘Carl B. Stokes United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States courthouse to be constructed at

5 the corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland,

6 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Carl B.

7 Stokes United States Courthouse’’.
2

•HR 4133 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the ‘‘Carl B. Stokes United States

6 Courthouse’’.

Æ
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE/FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Hiner, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director of
Crown Oil & Gas Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the period ended August 31, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

|By:    | /s/ John Hiner                                                                                                 
|------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | John Hiner                                                                                                     
|Title: | President (Principal Executive Officer),
      Secretary, Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) and Director
|       |                                                                                                                
|Date:  | October 15, 2008                                                                                               

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00372-CR

Richard Perez Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-08-173, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Richard Perez, Jr. was convicted of capital murder of a child under six years of age.

The trial court assessed punishment at life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Affirmed

Filed: July 14, 2010

Do Not Publish

2
----

| 1.              | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.                   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      16, 2010 | /s/ Dana C.      Gavenda                                                    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | Dana      C. Gavenda |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      16, 2010 | /s/ Kevin D.      Maroney                                                        |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | Kevin      D. Maroney |
|--------|-----------------------|

|   | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHELLE HART,

Plaintiff,

v.

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-12088

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For

the reasons set forth in an opinion issued this date,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s motion is

granted and Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Date: August 19, 2010

Copy to:

Vanessa G. Fluker, Esq.

Courtney D. Roschek, Esq.

Martin S. Frenkel, Esq.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CAREER AGENTS NETWORK, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-CV-12269

CAREERAGENTSNETWORK.BIZ and

CAREERAGENTNETWORK.BIZ,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

On June 26, 2009, the court conducted a hearing and, for the reasons stated on

the record, granted Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction order. During the

hearing, it became apparent to the court that, despite the fact that they have been

validly served, there is a high likelihood that Defendants may not appear and defend

against Plaintiff’s lawsuit. Plaintiff indicated that, if such were the case, it would pursue

a clerk’s entry of default and, thereafter, a default judgment. In anticipation of these

proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED that any motion for default judgment shall be filed on or before

July 21, 2009, and any response to such motion shall be filed by July 28, 2009. The

court will conduct a hearing on the motion for default judgment on July 29, 2009 at 2:00

p.m. Plaintiff shall ensure that this order and any motion for default judgment is validly

served on Defendants.

S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 06/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 54
2

Dated: June 30, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, June 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-12269.CAREERAGENTS.DefaultJudgmentHearing.wpd

2:09-cv-12269-RHC-MJH Doc # 10 Filed 06/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 55