alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., 

 Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-11783 

v. Honorable Anna Diggs Taylor 

JOHNSON ELECTRIC NORTH AMERICA, 

INC., a foreign corporation, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753)P53753 Stephen N. Weiss (SW3662) 

Brittany M. Schultz (P63272) Gregory J. Fleesler (GF2165) 

Dawn N. Perry (P72399) Michael J. Pospis (MP2489) 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC (not yet admitted to practice) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff MOSES & SINGER LLP

400 Renaissance Center Attorneys for Defendant

Detroit, MI 48243 The Chrysler Building

(313) 568-5341 405 Lexington Avenue 

 New York, NY 10174-1299 

 (212) 554-7800

 Matthew J. Lund (P48632) 

 Adam A. Wolf (P71278) 

 PEPPER HAMILTON LLP 

 100 Renaissance Center 

 Of Counsel for Defendant 

 Detroit, MI 48243 

 (313) 259-7100 

_____________________________________________________________________________

DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Nissan North America, 

Inc. makes the following disclosure: 

1. Is there a parent corporation or any publicly held corporation owning more than 10% of 

Nissan North America, Inc.’s stock? 

Yes. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. is the parent company of Nissan North America, Inc. 

Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. is publicly traded in Japan. American Depository Receipts 

Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 10, PageID.65 Filed 06/02/09 Page 1 of 3
in Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. are traded in the United States. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. 

owns more than 10% of Nissan North America, Inc.’s Stock. 

Dated: June 2, 2009 

Respectfully submitted, 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

By: /s/ Brittany M. Schultz______ 

Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753) 

Brittany M. Schultz (P63272) 

Dawn N. Perry (P72399) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Nissan 

400 Renaissance Center 

Detroit, MI 48243 

(313) 568-5341 

Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 10, PageID.66 Filed 06/02/09 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 2, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the 

Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 

following: 

Gregory J. Fleesler 

gfleesler@mosessinger.com,rtorres@mosessinger.com

Matthew J. Lund 

lundm@pepperlaw.com,mondah@pepperlaw.com

Michael J. Pospis - NOT SWORN 

mpospis@mosessinger.com

Stephen N. Weiss 

sweiss@mosessinger.com,jdefrank@mosessinger.com

Adam A. Wolfe 

wolfea@pepperlaw.com

Dated: June 2, 2009 

Respectfully submitted, 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC

By: /s/ Brittany M. Schultz______ 

Thomas S. Bishoff (P53753) 

Brittany M. Schultz (P63272) 

Dawn N. Perry (P72399) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Nissan 

400 Renaissance Center 

Detroit, MI 48243 

(313) 568-5341 

Case 2:09-cv-11783-LPZ-MKM ECF No. 10, PageID.67 Filed 06/02/09 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Ricardo Figueiredo Bomeny, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Brazil Fast Food Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not    contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state    a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light    of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual    report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Annual Report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining    disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(E)    and    15d-15(E))    for the registrant and I have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this annual    report is being prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual    report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of    internal control over financial reporting, to the    registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the    registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the    equivalent function):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. /s/  Ricardo    Figueiredo Bomeny    Ricardo Figueiredo Bomeny    Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial    Officer     Date: March 31, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ERIC LOPEZ, 

Petitioner, 

Case No. 09-11440

v. Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

C. ZYCH, 

Respondent. 

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus [dkt 1]. The matter

currently before the Court is Magistrate Judge Komives’s Report and Recommendation [dkt 12],

in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

Petitioner timely filed objections to the Report and Recommendation [dkt 13], and the Court reviews

those portions of the Report and Recommendation de novo. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the

court file, the Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner’s objections. As a result of that review,

the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and enters it as the findings and conclusions

of this Court.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [dkt 1]

is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. 

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 10, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of

record by electronic or U.S. mail on March 10, 2010.

s/Marie E. Verlinde 

Case Manager

(810) 984-3290
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 6, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated March 28, 2008, and published in the Federal 
Register on April 4, 2008 (73 FR 18570), Siegfried (USA), Inc., 
Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed in schedules I and II:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dihydromorphine (9145)......................  I
Amphetamine (1100)..........................  II
Methamphetamine (1105)......................  II
Methylphenidate (1724)......................  II
Amobarbital (2125)..........................  II
Pentobarbital (2270)........................  II
Secobarbital (2315).........................  II
Glutethimide (2550).........................  II
Codeine (9050)..............................  II
Oxycodone (9143)............................  II
Hydromorphone (9150)........................  II
Hydrocodone (9193)..........................  II
Methadone (9250)............................  II
Methadone intermediate (9254)...............  II
Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)   II
 (9273).
Morphine (9300).............................  II
Oxymorphone (9652)..........................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Siegfried (USA), Inc., to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Siegfried (USA), Inc., to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 
21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed.

    Dated: July 28, 2008.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-17974 Filed 8-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00638-CR

Joe LEE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10795

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED March 18, 2015.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4177 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4177

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
construction of the AuSable Hydroelectric Project in New York, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1996

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
construction of the AuSable Hydroelectric Project in New York, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) Project Numbered 10812.--Notwithstanding the time period 
specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that 
would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
project numbered 10836-000NY, the Commission shall, at the request of 
the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in 
accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest 
requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures under that 
section, extend the time period during which the licensee is required 
to commence the construction of the project, under the extension 
described in subsection (b), for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--This subsection shall take effect on the date 
of the expiration of the extension of the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
that the Commission issued, prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationsof CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Samsonite Corporation (the “Company”) forthe fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard H. Wiley,as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Richard H. Wiley |                                             |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                | Richard H. Wiley                                 |
| Title:               | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
| Date:                | May 15, 2006                                |
|                      |                                                  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROADSHIPS HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Michael
Nugent
 Michael
Nugent, Chief Executive Officer
 Date: August 19, 2009
# D ,viror,!

't iti..... ,,A,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 23-0005
IN RE THE MOTION OF DANIEL M. SCHAFER FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAROF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

# FILED MAY 2 3 2023 Bowen Greenwood Clark of Slaprerne Court State of Montano ORDER

Daniel M. Schafer has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana pursuant to Rule V ofthe Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character andFitnesshas certifiedthat Schafer hasprovided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Daniel M. Schafer may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearingin may be madeby contactingthe office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this CI

—

day ofMay, 2023.
ChiefJustice 05/23/2023

Case Number: PR 23-0005

# (94noiqwy t justices

2
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inter-Atlantic Financial,
Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Andrew S. LernerName: Andrew S. LernerTitle: Chief Executive Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD CONRAD WITBRODT, #272951,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-11046

v. HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN

BLAINE LAFLER,

Respondent.

/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration, brought pursuant

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, concerning the Court’s January 20, 2010 opinion and order

granting Respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus on

statute of limitations grounds.

Petitioner’s motion must be denied. A motion for reconsideration which presents issues

already ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, will not be granted.

See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550 (E.D. Mich. 1999); Czajkowski v. Tindall & Assoc.,

P.C., 967 F. Supp. 951, 952 (E.D. Mich. 1997). The Court properly dismissed the petition for failure

to comply with the one-year statute of limitations application to federal habeas actions. Petitioner’s

convictions became final on June 3, 2002 and he did not seek collateral review in the state courts

until March 29, 2007, well after the one-year limitations period for filing his habeas petition expired.

Petitioner was aware or could have reasonably become aware of the factual basis for his claims at

the time of his trial and direct appeals – or, at the very latest, well within the one-year period for
2

seeking federal habeas review. Moreover, Petitioner has not presented new reliable evidence of his

actual innocence. Petitioner has not met his burden of showing a palpable defect by which the Court

has been misled or his burden of showing that a different disposition must result from a correction

thereof, as required by Local Rule 7.1(g)(3). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s motion

for reconsideration. This case is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 18, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

February 18, 2010.

s/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3886

To clarify the intent of the Congress in Public Law 93–632 to require

the Secretary of Agriculture to continue to provide for the maintenance

of 18 concrete dams and weirs that were located in the Emigrant Wilderness at the time the wilderness area was designated as wilderness in

that Public Law.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 24, 1996

Mr. DOOLITTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To clarify the intent of the Congress in Public Law 93–

632 to require the Secretary of Agriculture to continue

to provide for the maintenance of 18 concrete dams

and weirs that were located in the Emigrant Wilderness

at the time the wilderness area was designated as wilderness in that Public Law.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3886 IH

1 SECTION 1. RETENTION AND MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN

2 DAMS AND WEIRS, EMIGRANT WILDERNESS,

3 STANISLAUS NATIONAL FOREST, CALIFOR4 NIA.

5 With respect to the Emigrant Wilderness in the

6 Stanislaus National Forest, California, as designated by

7 section 2(b) of Public Law 93–632 (88 Stat. 2154; 16

8 U.S.C. 1132 note), the Secretary of Agriculture shall re9 tain and maintain the 18 concrete dams and weirs that

10 were located within the boundaries of the Emigrant Wil11 derness on the date of the enactment of such Public Law,

12 January 3, 1975. If personnel of the Forest Service are

13 unavailable to perform the maintenance of the dams and

14 weirs, or to supplement the maintenance activities of For15 est Service personnel, the Secretary shall contract with

16 other persons to perform the maintenance at Government

17 expense or permit other persons to perform the mainte18 nance at private expense.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3799

To amend title 49, United States Code, to exclude not-for-hire transportation

of agricultural production materials from regulation under the Hazardous

Materials Transportation Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 12, 1996

Mr. BUYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to exclude notfor-hire transportation of agricultural production materials from regulation under the Hazardous Materials

Transportation Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION.

4 Section 5117(d)(2) of title 49, United States Code,

5 is amended—

6 (1) by striking ‘‘do not prohibit’’;

7 (2) in subparagraph (A)—
2

•HR 3799 IH

1 (A) by inserting ‘‘do not prohibit’’ before

2 ‘‘or regulate’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘or’’ the last place it ap4 pears;

5 (3) in subparagraph (B) by inserting ‘‘do not

6 prohibit’’ before ‘‘transportation’’;

7 (4) by striking the period at the end of sub8 paragraph (B) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

9 (5) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(C) do not regulate the not-for-hire trans11 portation of an agricultural production material

12 from a source of supply to a farm, from a farm

13 to another farm, from a field to another field on

14 a farm, or from the farm back to the source of

15 supply.’’.

16 SEC. 2. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION MATERIAL DEFINED.

17 Section 5117 of title 49, United States Code, is

18 amended by adding at the end the following:

19 ‘‘(f) AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION MATERIAL DE20 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘agricultural production

21 material’ means a hazardous material that is used to sup22 port the production of an agricultural commodity and in23 cludes pesticides, fertilizers, and fuels.’’.

Æ