alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CORIXA CORPORATION

I, Michelle Burris, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Corixa Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 8, 2004            /s/ MICHELLE BURRIS
                               ------------------------------------
                               MICHELLE BURRIS
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11309]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Missouri (FEMA–1773–DR), dated 06/25/2008.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/01/2008 through 07/18/2008.                    

*Effective Date:*                         07/18/2008.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         08/25/2008.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of MISSOURI, dated 06/25/2008, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/18/2008.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8–17548 Filed 7–30–08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
#### Harry M. BLAIR, Robert Owston, and Joseph Walsh, Common Stockholders Committee, Interveners, et al., Appellants, v. E. McLain WATTERS, Arthur Peck, and Pierce Archer, Jr., Debentureholders’ Protective Committee, et al., Appellees.

No. 4286.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 5, 1938.

George Pfeil, of New York City, Poffenbarger & Poffenbarger, of Charleston, W. Va., and Albert L. Cox, of Washington, D. C., in support of petition for appeal.

Stanley C. Morris, of Charleston, W. Va., in opposition thereto.

Appeal denied. Order filed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A1 07 7 . RUSSELL NATHANI EL J ENNI NGS v . THE STATE.

In Decem b er 2 0 1 5, Ru ss el l J en ni n g s p l ed g u il t y t o ag g rav at ed as s au l t an d

p art i ci p at i o n i n cri m i n a l s t r e e t g an g act i v i t y , an d t h e t ri al co u rt i m p o sed a 2 0 -y ear

s en t en ce, wi t h t h e fi rs t 1 5 y ears t o be s erv ed i n p ri s o n, an d th e rem ai nd er t o b e s erv ed

o n pro b at i o n

. In Oct ob er 2 01 6

, J en n i n g s fi l ed a m ot i o n t o m o d i fy h i s s en t en ce. Th e

t ri al co urt d en ied t h e m o ti o n o n Oct o b er 5

, 2 01 6

, an d J en n i n gs fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal

o n No v em

ber 9 , 2 0 1 6

. 1 W e l ack ju ri s di ct i o n

. A no t i ce o f ap p eal m

us t be fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e t ri al co u rt o rd er

s o u g ht t o b e ap p eal ed

. O CGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce

o f ap p eal i s an ab so l ut e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d ict i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. R o wl a n d v.

S t a t e , 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 56 ) (1 9 9 5 ). J en ni n gs ’ s n o t i ce o f a p p e a l i s

u n t i m el y , as i t was fi l ed 3 5 d ay s aft er en t ry o f th e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er. Co n s eq u en t l y ,

t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri sd i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 J en n i n g s ’ s n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s d at ed Oct o b er 2 6, 2 0 16 , b u t was n o t fi l ed i n

t h e t ri al co urt u n t il No v em ber 9 , 2 0 1 6

. April 20, 2017

04/20/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4102 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4102

    To provide regulatory relief for certain farm transportation of 
                          hazardous materials.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 1996

    Mr. Ewing (for himself, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Poshard, Mr. Barcia, Mr. 
    Hastert, Mr. Latham, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Ganske, Mr. 
    Bereuter, Mr. Bunning of Kentucky, Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Weller, Mr. 
 McIntosh, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Lightfoot, Mr. Coble, Mr. Boehner, 
   Mr. Leach, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Barrett of 
 Nebraska, Mr. Peterson of Minnesota, Mr. Rose, Mr. Lucas of Oklahoma, 
Mr. Combest, Mr. McHugh, and Mr. Towns) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide regulatory relief for certain farm transportation of 
                          hazardous materials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farm Transportation Regulatory 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON REGULATION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION MATERIAL 
              TRANSPORTATION.

    (a) In General.--Any regulation issued by the Department of 
Transportation relating to the transportation of agricultural 
production material as a hazardous material under chapter 51 of title 
49, United States Code, shall not prohibit a State from providing an 
exception from the hazardous materials transportation regulations for 
farmers and retailers who are providing not-for-hire intrastate 
transportation of an agricultural production material from a source of 
supply to a farm, from a farm to another farm, from a field to another 
field on a farm, or from the farm back to the source of supply.
    (b) Agricultural Production Material Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``agricultural production material'' means a hazardous material 
that is used to support the production of an agricultural commodity and 
includes pesticides, fertilizers, and fuels.
                                 <all>
```
O rder filed August 23 , 2018



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 034

- CV

__________

DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, INC. ET AL.

, Appellant s

V.

SUZANN RUFF , Appellee

On Appeal from the 29 t h District Court

Palo Pinto County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. C46164

O R D E R

Destination Development Partners, Inc. and several related entities, including

CM Resort LLC, filed a n appeal from a portion of an interlocutory order si gned by

the trial court on January 30, 2018

. CM Resort LLC ha s now filed in this court a

suggestion of bankruptcy

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1. CM Resort LLC indicat es that

on A ugust 15 , 2018, it filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U nited States

Bankruptcy Code

. The notice of bankruptcy complies with T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.1

.2

Therefore, p ursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2, w e abate this appeal

. The parties are

requested to inform this c ourt of the resolution of the bankruptcy proceeding s or any

other event that would allow this appeal to be reinstated. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.3.

This appeal is abated.

PER CURIAM

August 23 , 2018

Panel consists of: Willson, J., Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1

Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
cbmg_ex1037.htm


Exhibit 10.37


 




  





1











  






 


 




  





2











  






 


 




  





3











  






 


 




  





4











  






 


 




  





5











  






 


 




  





6











  






 


 




  





7











  






 


 




  





8











  






 


 




  





9











  






 


 




  





10











  






 


 




  





11











  






 


 




  





12











  






 


 




  





13











  






 


 




  





14











  






 


 




  





15











  






 


 




  





16











  






 


 




  





17











  






 


 




  





18











  






 


 




  





19











  






 


 




  





20











  






 


 




  





21











  






 


 




  





22











  






 


 




  





23











  






 


 




  





24











  






 


 




  





25











  






 


 




  





26











  






 


 




  





27











  






 


 




  





28











  






 


 




  





29











  






 


 




  





30











  






 


 




  





31











  






 


 


32
Summary Translation	Exhibit 4.67


 


Maximum Pledge Contract


 


Contract No.:2013JIYINZUIBAOZIDI13121744


 


Pledgor : LI YONG HUI


 


Pledgee : CITIC Shijiazhuang Branch


 


Signing Date : September 2, 2013


 


Pledge Definition : To ensure multiple loans Party B (Pledgee)
has lent to Hebei Xuhua Trading Co., Ltd, Party A (Pledgor) is willing to provide the Maximum Pledge Guarantee hereunder for Party
B.


 


Maximum Amount: RMB120, 000,000


 


Pledge Term : From September 2, 2013 to February 16, 2015
Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. (333-42079, 333-48197, 333-87879, 333-70432 and 333-71100) of
Power-One, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 13, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" effective January 1, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Power-One, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los
Angeles, California
March 28, 2003

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3, No. 333-109331, FormS-3, No. 333-109335, Form S-3, No 333-88606, Form S-3, No. 333-03205, Form S-3,No. 333-13363, Form S-3, No. 333-64616, Form S-3, No. 333-65142, Form S-3, No.03596, Form S-8, No. 333-117669, Form S-8, No. 333-35853, Form S-8, No.333-81863, and Form S-8, No. 333-81865) of The Mills Corporation and in therelated Prospectuses, of our reports dated March 31, 2005, with the respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Mills Corporation,The Mills Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of The Mills Corporation, included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 
|   | /s/ Ernst  & Young LLP |
|--------|----------------------------|

 

McLean, Virginia

March 31, 2005

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of SVT, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dhir Sarin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. I have reviewed the Report;

     2. Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated:  April 15, 2003                     By: /s/ Dhir Sarin
                                               ---------------
                                               Dhir Sarin
                                               Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD WALLACE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DENNIS LLOYD, DOCTOR,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 09-11991

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights action against Defendant pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 on May 26, 2009. He filed an amended complaint on October 9, 2009.

Defendant subsequently filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment,

the latter of which this Court granted in an Opinion and Order entered on this date.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Plaintiff’s amended

complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DATE: March 1, 2010 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Copies to:

Richard Wallace

Register #26340-039

Genesee County Jail

1002 Saginaw Street

Flint, MI 48502-1499

Ronald W. Chapman, Esq.

Magistrate Judge Charles BInder
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd.: 

We consent to incorporation by reference in theregistration statements Nos. 33-90926 and 333-75706 on Form S-8, and No. 333-38338 on Form S-3 of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. of our report dated March 31, 2008, relating to the balance sheets of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. as ofDecember 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31,2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. 

Our report on the financial statements refers to the adoption by the Company of FASBInterpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*, effective January 1, 2007*,*and SFAS No. 123(R), *Share Based Payment*, effectiveJanuary 1, 2006. 

 

Denver, Colorado 

March 31, 2008
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald J. WIDNER, Appellant. Ronald J. WIDNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 51021, WD 52617.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Oct. 29, 1996.

Ellen H. Flottman, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Ronald Widner appeals from his convictions on four counts of sale of a controlled substance, § 195.211,1 in the Circuit Court of Chariton County and the subsequent denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Discerning no jurisprudential value in publishing an opinion, we issue this summary order. However, the parties have been provided a memorandum explaining the basis for our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

1

 All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise noted.
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Charter
Aspect L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Christian Angstadt

Name:		Christian Angstadt
Title:	        Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2009