alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-20006-01-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

RICHARD WILDFONG, JR.,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT TWO, AND TAKING THE RULE

11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on September 21, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on

September 22, 2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s guilty plea. As of today’s

date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The

failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith

v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure

to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review

the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court, however, agrees with the findings

and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 114] is ADOPTED.

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 141, PageID.413 Filed 11/04/09 Page 1 of 2
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea as to count two is ACCEPTED, and

the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 100] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 4, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 4, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 141, PageID.414 Filed 11/04/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AUTO CLUB GROUP INS. CO.,

as Subrogee of Andrea and John Nelson, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 08-15205

 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

v. 

ALL-GLASS AQUARIUM CO., INC., 

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, 

v. 

JUDCO MANUFACTURING, INC., 

Third-Party Defendant. 

 /

JUDGMENT

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to this Court’s opinion and order dated

May 27, 2010, Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated at Port Huron, Michigan, this 27th day of May, 2010.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: S/Marie E. Verlinde 

APPROVED:

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNUM INSURANCE COMPANY O AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No: 2:09-cv-10045

HON. ROBERT H. CLELAND 

v. Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives

SHERYL GARY, PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE

OF ROSE ANN COBB and MARK COBB,

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF DAVID I. COBB

Defendants.

____________________________________________________/

ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF FUNDS HELD IN INTEREST BEARING

ACCOUNT

The parties having filed their pleadings and the Court having entered an Opinion

and Order Granting Defendant Sheryl Gary’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the

Court being fully advised in the premises;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED as follows:

 The initial deposit of $202,000 plus 100% of the accrued interest shall be paid to

the Estate of Rose Ann Cobb, Decedent; that estate having an Employer Identification

Number (EIN) of XX-XXXXXXX and mailed to:

Denise M. Hudson

Attorney for Personal Representative

615 Griswold, Suite 1626

Detroit, MI 48226

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-10045-RHC-PJK Doc # 24 Filed 09/18/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 384
Dated: September 18, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on

this date, September 18, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-10045-RHC-PJK Doc # 24 Filed 09/18/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 385
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-Q of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the nine months ended October 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edwin
Morrow, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.

Date: December 15, 2010


/s/ EDWIN MORROW
-------------------------------
Edwin Morrow
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20023-04

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

ASHLEY REBECCA ALLEN,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On September 15, 2009, the case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of

the parties, Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. The Defendant, along with counsel, appeared

before me on September 15, 2009. In open court I examined the Defendant under oath,

confirmed the Defendant’s consent, and then advised and questioned the Defendant regarding

each of the inquiries prescribed by Rule 11(b) of the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE. Based upon the Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND 1) that

the Defendant is competent to tender a plea, 2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly,

intelligently made, and 3) that the offense(s) to which he pled are supported by an independent

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have

ordered the preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:09-cr-20023-TLL-PTM Doc # 109 Filed 09/16/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 374
II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the FEDERAL RULES OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and

Recommendation within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins.

Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984

(6th Cir. 2005). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and

Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security, 474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir.

2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of

any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: September 16, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on Janet Parker and Mary Hickey, and served on District Judge

Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: September 16, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

1:09-cr-20023-TLL-PTM Doc # 109 Filed 09/16/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 375
## In **T he**  **Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo** 
No. 07 - 24 - 00161 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF S.F . - N., A CHILD On Appeal from the 251st District Court Randall County, Texas Trial Court No . 62268 - C , Honorable Ana Estevez , Presiding 

### June 6 , 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellant, Jimmy Nunn , Sr., appeals from the trial court’s Order Holding Respondent in Contempt for Failure to Pay Medical Support, Granting Judgment for Arrearages, and Suspending Commitm ent. Now pending before this C ourt is Appellant’s motion seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeal. The C ourt finds that the motion complies with the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of the C ourt has been delivered to date, we grant2 the motion. The appeal is dismissed. 1 Because the motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the pa yment of costs, costs will be taxed against Appellant. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam

1 The appeal is also dismissed because Appellant failed to pay the requisite filing fee. By letter, we notified Appellant that the filing fee was overdue and that unless he was excused from paying court costs, failure to pay the filing fee by May 13, 2024, would result in dismissal of the appeal. Appellant has yet to pay the fee or seek leave to proceed without payment of court costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 20.1, 25.1(b), 42.3(c).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34504-34505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the 
following proposal for the collection of information under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0018.
    Title and Form Number: Application for Accreditation as Service 
Organization Representative, VA Form 21; and Appointment of Attorney or 
Agent as Claimant's Representative, VA Form 22a.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Need and Uses:
    VA Form 21 will be used to obtain basic information necessary to 
determine whether an individual may be accredited as a service 
organization representative for purposes of representation of claimants 
before the VA. The information will be used by VA to evaluate 
qualifications, ensure against conflicts of interest, and allow 
appropriate organization officials to certify the character and 
qualifications of applicants.
    VA Form 22a will be used by a claimant for VA benefits to confer 
power of attorney upon an attorney or agent in order that the attorney 
or agent may represent the claimant in proceedings before the VA. The 
information is necessary for determining whether access to claimant 
records may be provided and for notification purposes.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households, Business or other for-
profit, Not-for-profit institutions and State, Local or Tribal 
Government
    Estimated Annual Burden: 1,750 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,000.

ADDRESSES: A copy of this submission may be obtained from Ron Taylor, 
VA Clearance Officer (045A4), Department of Veterans Affairs, 8l0 
Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015.
    Comments and recommendations concerning the submission should be

[[Page 34505]]

directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. DO NOT send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer by no later than August 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Taylor, VA Clearance Officer 
(045A4), (202) 273-8015.


    Dated: June 24, 1996.

    By direction of the Secretary.
William T. Morgan,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 96-16778 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-3 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 3412
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration


Manfacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec. 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on May 13, 1996, Dupont 
Pharmaceuticals, The Dupont Merck Pharmaceutical Company, 1000 Stewart 
Avenue, Garden City, New York 11530, made application to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as bulk manufacturer 
of the basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oxycodone (9143)..............................................        II
Hydrocodone (9193)............................................        II
Oxymorphone (9652)............................................        II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to 
make finished products.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than September 3, 1996.

    Dated: June 27, 1996.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-17063 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**(Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley)**

 

I,Jeffrey M Watson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Manhattan Bancorp,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Bancorp;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) internal controls over the financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a.     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe  designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to usby others within that entity, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.    evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon ourevaluation; and

 

c.     disclosed in this report anychanges in the registrant’s internal control that occurred during theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a.     all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.    any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:   August 13, 2008 |   | /s/  Jeffrey M. Watson                |
|-----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Jeffrey M. Watson                     |
|                              |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.1 Filed 01/05/09 Page 1 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.2 Filed 01/05/09 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.3 Filed 01/05/09 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.4 Filed 01/05/09 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.5 Filed 01/05/09 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 01/05/09 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.7 Filed 01/05/09 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.8 Filed 01/05/09 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.9 Filed 01/05/09 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.10 Filed 01/05/09 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.11 Filed 01/05/09 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 01/05/09 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.13 Filed 01/05/09 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.14 Filed 01/05/09 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.15 Filed 01/05/09 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.16 Filed 01/05/09 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.17 Filed 01/05/09 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.18 Filed 01/05/09 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:09-cv-10028-JAC-SDP ECF No. 1, PageID.19 Filed 01/05/09 Page 19 of 19
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Highland Apartments, L.L.C. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 08-14712

Richard Golden, et al., Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendants.

__________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK’S ENTRY OF DEFAULT

This matter is currently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s

Entry of Default. The Court finds that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional

process and therefore orders that the motions will be decided upon the briefs. See Local Rule

7.1(e)(2), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan. For the reasons below, the Court

shall GRANT the motion.

Plaintiffs filed this action on November 7, 2008. On December 19, 2008, a Clerk’s Entry

of Default was entered. (Docket Entry No. 5). Plaintiffs have neither sought nor obtained a

default judgment in this action. On January 14, 2009, Defendants filed the instant motion

seeking to set aside the clerk’s entry of default.

Plaintiffs have not filed any response in opposition to the motion and the time for doing

so has passed.

 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) provides that “[f]or good cause shown the court

may set aside an entry of default.” When evaluating either a motion to set aside an entry of

2:08-cv-14712-SFC-SDP Doc # 9 Filed 02/13/09 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 99
2

default or a default judgment, the court considers three factors: 1) whether the default was the

result of the defendant’s willful or culpable conduct; 2) whether the plaintiff would be prejudiced

if the default is set aside; and 3) whether the defendant asserts any meritorious defenses to the

claims. United Coin Meter Co., Inc. v. Seaboard Coastline R.R., 705 F.2d 839, 844-45 (6th Cir.

1989). 

“Rule 55(c) leaves to the discretion of the trial judge the decision whether to set aside an

entry of default. However, a strong preference for trials on the merits in federal courts had led to

the adoption of a somewhat modified standard of review where defaults are involved.” Shepard

Claims Service, Inc. v. William Darrah & Associates, 796 F.2d 190, 193 (6th Cir. 1986). In

practice, a “somewhat more lenient standard” is applied where, as here, there has only been an

entry of default and no default judgment has been issued. Id.

After reviewing Defendants’ unopposed motion, the Court finds the applicable standard

has been satisfied here and that the Court should set aside the clerk’s entry of default.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Entry of

Default is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file an Answer to Plaintiffs’

Complaint within 10 days of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: February 13, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

February 13, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

2:08-cv-14712-SFC-SDP Doc # 9 Filed 02/13/09 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 100
3

S/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14712-SFC-SDP Doc # 9 Filed 02/13/09 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 101
H. R. 3710

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 611 North Florida

Avenue in Tampa, Florida, as the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse under construction at 611 North

Florida Avenue in Tampa, Florida, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall become effective on January 3, 1997.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.