alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001042282
<NAME>                        SilverStream Software, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                                         46,798,806
<SECURITIES>                                   246,690
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,938,308
<ALLOWANCES>                                   763,245
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,117,876
<PP&E>                                         5,223,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,387,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 80,662,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16,569,265
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       17,689
<OTHER-SE>                                     63,567,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   80,662,535
<SALES>                                        23,064,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,064,407
<CGS>                                          1,412,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,664,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               34,620,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             189,863
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (21,989,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,989,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,989,293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (2.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (2.64)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALEJANDRO TORRIS GARDNER,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 09-10335

 HONORABLE AVERN COHN

KENNETH McKEE, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY (Doc. 13)

This is a habeas case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner Alejandro Torris

Gardner (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner, challenged his jury convictions for first-degree

murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (felony firearm), and

felon in possession of a firearm. Petitioner claimed that he was deprived of a fair trial by

his trial counsel’s omissions, the prosecutor’s conduct and comments, a statement by

the trial court regarding reasonable doubt, and the cumulative effect of trial errors. The

Court denied the petition for lack of merit and declined to issue a certificate of

appealability on any of the claims presented in the petition. See Memorandum and

Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Declining to Issue a Certificate of

Appealability, filed June 1, 2011. Doc. 9. 

On June 30, 2011, Petitioner signed and dated a motion for a certificate of

appealability, which is now before the Court. Doc. 13. Given that the Court has already

2:09-cv-10335-AC-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 07/13/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2214
2

determined that Petitioner is not entitled to a certificate of appealability, Petitioner’s

motion is moot. Moreover, to the extent Petitioner seeks reconsideration of the denial of

a certificate of appealability, he has failed to show the Court’s decision was in error. 

See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(h)(3). Accordingly, the motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

 S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 13, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Alejandro Gardner,

#431477, Chippewa Correctional Facility, 4269 W. M-80, Kincheloe, MI 48974 and the

attorneys of record on this date, July 13, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-10335-AC-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 07/13/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2215
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN

v.

Plaintiff, Case No. 08-CV-14922

Hon. Patrick J. Duggan

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD

OF TRUSTEES, GARY D. RUSSI, MARY BETH
SNYDER, and LIONEL MATEN, in their

official capacity,

Defendants.

AFFIDAVIT OF MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN

STATE OF MICHIGAN)

)ss

COUNTY OF OAKLAND )

I, Micah Fialka-Feldman, being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows:

1.

The following statements are made and based upon the best of my personal
knowledge, information, and belief.

After filing my housing application with the university and getting the rejection
letter, | must have given the documents to my parents. | looked all over for a
copy of the original application and the rejection letter but could not find them in
my records.

The only thing I could find was a front page copy of the application and the e-
mail telling us we would be receiving a rejection letter soon.

When I could not find these documents I went to the housing department earlier
this year, 2009, and asked a secretary if I could get a copy of my original
application. She told me that since the matter is in litigation I or my attorney
would have to request it from the legal department.

Since last fall, I have looked for these documents but was unable to find them
until my dad located them recently.


If called as a witness and sworn, I am competent and fully able to testify to the matters

stated herein.
M (eef Fin

Micah Fialka-Feldman

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this \X of May, 2009.

Unite MRO
Notary Public

Cak\eax® County, State of Michigan
My Commission expires: \\= A-QO\“
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Healy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |        |  |                                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 6, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael E. Healy
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Healy                                                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenced into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made on or before or after the
date of this Report), irrespective at any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD CADWALLADER, 

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-cv-10935

Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor

v. Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 

Defendant.

______________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING TO COMMISSIONER

(Docket Entry 18)

This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder’s Report and

Recommendation of December 1, 2009, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment be granted and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied.

The court has reviewed the file, Defendant’s Objection, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation. The court finds that the law cited by the Magistrate has been correctly placed

and is controlling in this matter. 

THEREFORE, the court will accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of

December 1, 2009, as the findings and conclusions of this court.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Binder’s Report and Recommendation

of December 1, 2009, is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D/E 13) is

GRANTED and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D/E 16) is DENIED, and the

decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this

matter is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings

consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 4, 2010 s/Anna Diggs Taylor

ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-10935-ADT-CEB Doc # 20 Filed 02/04/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 777
-2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to

their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 4,

2010.

s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10935-ADT-CEB Doc # 20 Filed 02/04/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 778
Exhibit 10.2 Q2 FY2014






                
FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Fifteenth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of January 1, 2014 by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Employer") and William Naylon ("Executive").
Recitals


		
	A)
	On January 16, 2002 an Employment Agreement ("Agreement") was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive.




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on fourteen prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:




Agreement


		
	1.
	Section 2.1 of the Agreement which provides:




		
	2.1 
	Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $408,000 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.


 
is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2014, to provide as follows:


		
	1.
	Salary.  For Executive's services hereunder, Employer shall pay as base salary to Executive the amount of $416,160 during each year of the Employment Term.  Said salary shall be payable in equal installments in conformity with Employer's normal payroll period. Executive shall receive such salary increases, if any, as Employer, in its sole discretion, shall determine.






		
	2.
	Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides: 




		
	3.1
	Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on January 16, 2002 and shall continue until January 31, 2014 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.




is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2014, to provide as follows:


		
	1.
	Term.  The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on January 16, 2002 and shall continue until January 31, 2015 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.




		
	3.
	All other terms of the Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.

















Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.








EXECUTIVE                            EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


William Naylon                     By:                 


______________________                Name:     Jose Luis Laparte    


Its:     CEO and President
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3607 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3607

To amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as 
   the Paperwork Reduction Act, to ensure that Federal agencies give 
priority to reducing paperwork burdens on small businesses having 50 or 
                            fewer employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1996

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the 
Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as 
   the Paperwork Reduction Act, to ensure that Federal agencies give 
priority to reducing paperwork burdens on small businesses having 50 or 
                            fewer employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIORITY TO REDUCING PAPERWORK BURDENS ON CERTAIN SMALL 
              BUSINESSES.

    Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the 
Paperwork Reduction Act, is amended as follows:
            (1) Section 3501(1) is amended by inserting 
        ``microenterprises,'' after ``small businesses,''.
            (2) Section 3502 is amended by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon at the end of paragraph (13)(D), by striking the 
        period at the end of paragraph (14) and inserting ``; and'', 
        and by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(15) the term `microenterprise' means a person--
                    ``(A) engaged in business solely in the United 
                States or its territories; and
                    ``(B) that employs 50 or fewer individuals.''.
            (3) Section 3504 is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(1)(B)(i) by inserting ``, 
                especially burden affecting microenterprises'' before 
                the semicolon at the end;
                    (B) in subsection (c)(3) by inserting ``, 
                microenterprises,'' after ``individuals''; and
                    (C) in subsection (c)(5) by inserting ``, with a 
                particular emphasis on potential harmful effects on 
                microenterprises'' before the period at the end.
            (4) Section 3505(a)(2) is amended by inserting ``on 
        individuals, microenterprises, and entities most adversely 
        affected'' before the semicolon.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Steve Harding,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of American  Exploration  Corporation  for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial
condition and results of operations of Sierra Resource Group, Inc.


May 18, 2009


                                            By: /s/ STEVE HARDING
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Steve Harding
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer




     I, Brian Manko, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of American  Exploration  Corporation  for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Sierra Resource Group, Inc.


May 18, 2009


                                            By: /s/ BRIAN MANKO
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Brian Manko
                                                    Chief Financial Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to American  Exploration  Corporation  and will be retained by American
Exploration  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Darrell Lee BOSTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1255-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

March 16, 1994.

Steven A. Kelley, Waxahachie, for appellant.

Mary Lou Shipley, Dist. Atty. & David Sloan, Asst. Dist. Atty., Waxahachie, Robert Huttash, State’s Atty. & Carl E.F. Dally, First Asst. State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION ON STATE’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

A jury convicted Appellant of robbery and assessed his punishment at twenty-five years imprisonment after finding he was a habitual offender. This conviction was reversed. *Boston v. State,*833 S.W.2d 334 (Tex.App.— Waco 1992).

The Court of Appeals held that Article 36.01, V.A.C.C.P., allows a defendant to make an opening statement before the State presents its case even if the State does not make an opening statement. However, we have since determined that Art. 36.01 allows a defendant to make an opening statement pri- or to presentation of the State’s case only when the State first makes one. *Moore v. State,*868 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Cr.App.1993). The State’s petitions for discretionary review are therefore summarily granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of the opinion in *Moore,*supra.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32815-32816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16135]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1099-DR]


Oregon; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 32816]]

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Oregon, (FEMA-1099-DR), dated February 9, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 14, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Oregon, is hereby amended to include the following area among those 
areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe 
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of 
February 9, 1996:

The Lands of the Coquille Indian Tribe for Public Assistance and 
Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-16135 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45049-45050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[F-19329-B; AK-964-1410-HY-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the 
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be

[[Page 45050]]

issued to Mendas Cha-Ag Native Corporation. The lands are in the 
vicinity of Healy Lake, Alaska, and are located in:

Copper River Meridian, Alaska

T. 26 N., R. 5 E.,
    Secs. 21 and 22;
    Secs. 27, 28, and 29;
    Secs. 32 and 33.

    Containing 4,325.95 acres.

Fairbanks Meridian, Alaska

T. 12 S., R. 15 E.,
    Secs. 13 and 24.
    Containing 819.88 acres.

T. 11 S., R. 16 E.,
    Sec. 12.

    Containing 640 acres.
    Aggregating 5,785.83 acres.

    The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to Doyon, 
Limited, when the surface estate is conveyed to Mendas Cha-Ag Native 
Corporation. Notice of the decision will also be published four times 
in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner.

DATES: The time limits for filing an appeal are:
    1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely 
affected by the decision shall have until September 2, 2008 to file an 
appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR Part 4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: The Bureau of Land Management by 
phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98f9f3b6faf4f5b6fbf7f6eefde1f9f6fbfdd8f9f3b6faf4f5b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fe9f95d09c9293d09d9190889b879f909d9bbe9f95d09c9293d0999188">[email protected]</span></a>. 
Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, 
seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.

Barbara Opp Waldal,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication I.
[FR Doc. E8-17611 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>