alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42922

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

DELBERT WAYNE GILPIN ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 608

Filed: September 2, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven years, for lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen and concurrent indeterminate te rm of ten years for sexual exploitation of a child

, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Erik R. Lehtinen , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Be fore MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM
Delbert Wayne Gilpin pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen

, I.C.

§ 18

- 1508 , and sexual exploitation of a child, I.C. § 18

- 1507(2)(a). In exchange for his guilty
plea, additional charges were dismissed. The district court sentenced Gilpin to a unified term of
twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of seven years, for lewd conduct with a
minor child under sixteen and a concurrent indeterminate term of ten years for sexual
exploitation of a child

. Gilpin appeals.2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standa rd of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 I daho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 17 0 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Gilpin ’s judgment of conviction and sentence s are affirmed.
```
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter  ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery
E. Jones,  Secretary/Treasurer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 6, 2010

                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                Secretary/Treasurer
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Theresa BROMLEY, Appellant.

No. WD 45813.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 25, 1993.

Lew Kollias, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David B. Cosgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

This conviction of delivery of a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.211, RSMo Cum.Supp.1992, is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Siana Oil & Gas Co., LLC v. White Oak Operating Company LLC

Appellate case number: 01-21-00721-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-45224

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

On September 28, 2022, Michael J. Blanchard of the Butch Boyd Law Firm, attorney of 

record for appellant, Siana Oil and Gas Co., LLC, and Steven J. Mitby, Timothy W. Johnson, 

and John D. Bullock of the law firm Mitby Pacholder Johnson PLLC filed a “First Amended 

Motion to Withdraw and to Substitute Counsel and Designation of New Lead Counsel to 

Appellant Siana Oil and Gas Co., LLC.” Although there was no certificate of conference 

attached to the motion, more then ten days have passed and appellee has not responded to the 

motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3. The motion is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d).

The Clerk of this Court is directed to note the withdrawal of Michael J. Blanchard and the 

Butch Boyd Law Firm as counsel for appellant and to substitute Steven J. Mitby, Timothy W. 

Johnson, and John D. Bullock of the law firm Mitby Pacholder Johnson PLLC as counsel for 

appellant on the docket of this Court, with Steven J. Mitby designated as the new lead counsel in 

this case.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________

Acting individually 

Date: October 13, 2022
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Amnon Gonenne, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of MabCure Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      three month period ended June 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           

|By:    | /s/ Dr. Amnon Gonenne                                 | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Dr. Amnon Gonenne                                     | 
|Title: | President, Chief Executive
      Officer and Director | 
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|Date:  | August 14, 2009                                       | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KEVIN and HANNAH COLE

, Appellant s

,

v.

BENJAMIN HOWARD and VILLA OCEANA, INC.

, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 20

- 367

[ June 18, 2020 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case

No. CACE17

- 010848

.

Lamont Mignott of Mignott Law, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Philippe Sy monvicz, Fort Lauderdale , for appellee s

.

P ER C U RIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1172

MEI YING LIN, Petitioner,

v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: September 24, 2008 Decided: October 8, 2008 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas V. Massucci, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mei Ying Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Lin first challenges the determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Lin fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that she seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Lin’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Lin failed to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.* Lin’s brief merely recites the requirements for establishing a claim under the Convention Against Torture. She fails to raise any specific claims in this regard and has therefore waived appellate review. SeeFed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9)(A) (“[T]he argument . . . must contain . . . appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record on which the appellant relies.”); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (“Failure to comply with the specific dictates of [Rule 28] with respect to a particular claim triggers abandonment of that claim on appeal.”); see also Ngarurih v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004). 3 Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Secretary of Energy Advisory Board; Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

SUMMARY: Consistent with the provisions of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770), notice is hereby given 
of the following advisory committee meeting:
NAME: Secretary of Energy Advisory Board--Openness Advisory Panel.
DATES AND TIMES: Wednesday, July 24, 1996, 8:30 AM-4:30 PM.
PLACE: Capital Hilton Hotel, South American Room, 16th and K Streets, 
NW, Washington, D.C. 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cheney, Executive Director 
(Acting), 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585, (202) 
586-7092.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of the Committee:

    The purpose of the Openness Advisory Panel (Panel) is to provide 
advice to the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board (SEAB) regarding the 
current status and strategic direction for the Department's 
classification and declassification policies and programs, as well as 
other aspects of the Department's ongoing Openness Initiative. The 
Panel's work will help institutionalize the Department's Openness 
Initiative.

Tentative Agenda

8:30 AM-9:00 AM  Opening Remarks
9:00 AM-9:30 AM  The DOE Openness Initiative; The Classification 
System; Challenges and Issues
9:30 AM-10:00 AM  Discussion
10:00 AM-10:15 AM  Break
10:15 AM-10:30 AM  Human Radiation Records Experience--Implications for 
Openness
10:30 AM-10:45 AM  Discussion
10:45 AM-11:30 AM  Invited Presentations
11:30 AM-12:00 Noon  Discussion
12:00 Noon-12:30 PM  Public Comment
12:30 PM-1:30 PM  Lunch
1:30 PM-4:00 PM  Discussion of a Work Plan for the Advisory Panel
4:00 PM  Adjourn

    A final agenda will be available at the meeting.

Public Participation

    The Chairman of the Panel is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will, in the Chairman's judgment, facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business. During its meeting in Washington, D.C. the Panel 
welcomes public comment. Members of the public will be heard in the 
order in which they sign up at the beginning of the meeting. The Panel 
will make every effort to hear the views of all interested parties. 
Written comments may be submitted to David Cheney, Executive Director 
(Acting), Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, AB-1, 1000 Independence 
Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585.

Minutes

    Minutes and a transcript of the meeting will be available for 
public review and copying approximately 30 days following the meeting 
at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 1E-190 Forrestal 
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC, between 9:00 AM 
and 4:00 PM, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on July 1, 1996.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-17117 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
**Exhibit 32.0**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Harry P. Doherty, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer, and Donald C. Fleming, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer, of Staten Island Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), herebycertify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)         The Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| **Date: March**** **15, 2004  | By:    | /s/ Harry P.  Doherty                               |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   | Harry P. Doherty                                    |
| *** ***                       |   | *Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer* |
| **Date: March**** **15,  2004 | By:    | /s/ Donald C. Fleming                               |
|                               |   | Donald C. Fleming                                   |
| *** ***                       |   | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

*A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct has been provided to Staten Island Bancorp, Inc. and will be retainedby Staten Island Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request*

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15(d) -14(a), AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
 Date: February 12, 2008
    
    /s/ John W. CombsJohn W. CombsChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

JAIME RAY BERRY, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

MS. PAM FEIL, LAW LIBRARY 

SUPERVISOR; MR. ROBERT 

LEGRAND, WARDEN, LOVELOCK 

CORRECTIONAL CENTER; MR. 

JAMES G. COX, DIRECTOR NEVADA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; 

AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondents. 

No. 68319 

FILED 

JUL 2 8 2016 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an 

order directing the Lovelock Correctional Center and Nevada Department 

of Corrections to make notary services available without having to present 

identification with a signature. Without deciding upon the merits of any 

claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to 

exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. The 

instant petition raises factual issues that are better addressed in the 

district court in the first instance. See Round Hill Gen. Improvement Din. 

v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981) ("When disputed 

factual issues are critical in demonstrating the propriety of a writ of 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

to; i 947A .040 
J. 

J. 

J. 

mandamus, the writ should be sought in the district court, with appeal 

from an adverse judgnient to this court."). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

cc: Jaime Ray Berry 

Attorney General/Carson City 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A me
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 24 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 24 Filed 04/09/18 Page 2 of 2
AMENDMENT TO INVESTOR RELATIONS AGREEMENT    Tara Minerals Corp. and Roadshows Intl. Inc. agree to amend their Agreement, a copy of which is attached, as follows:  1. The compensation for the services to be provided by Roadshows Intl. will be 30,000 shares of Tara Minerals common stock and 22,500 Euros.  No options will be issued by Tara Minerals for the services to be provided by Roadshows Intl.  2. Roadshows Intl. will pay Tara Minerals $1,500 for the shares.  The shares will be issued after payment has been received.  The shares will be issued in the name of Stefan Huber.  Agreed to and accepted as of January 26, 2010.  TARA MINERALS CORP.   By: /s/ Francis R Biscan Francis R. Biscan, President    ROADSHOWS INTL. INC.   By: /s/ Stefan Huber Stefan Huber         TM Amendment to Agree 2-3-10
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                 Subsidiaries of Nebco Evans Holding Company



                                                           Jurisdiction of
                   Name of Entity                            Organization
                   --------------                         ----------------

              AmeriServe Food Distribution, Inc.              Delaware

              AmeriServe of Canada Ltd.                       Ontario

              AmeriServe Funding Corporation                  Delaware

              AmeriServe Transportation, Inc.                 Nebraska

              Chicago Consolidated Corporation                Illinois

              Delta Transportation, Ltd.                      Wisconsin

              Northland Transportation Services, Inc.         Nebraska

              PFS de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                     Mexico

              Servicios AmeriServe S.A. de C.V.               Mexico

              Steamboat Acquisition Corp.                     Delaware

              Holberg Warehouse Properties, Inc. (55%)        Delaware