Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 2, 1996 / Notices 34427

[Docket No. RP96–283–000]

Columbia Gulf Transmission

Company; Notice of Proposed

Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

June 26, 1996.

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

Columbia Gulf Transmission Company

(Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as

part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second

Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets

listed on Appendix A attached to the

filing, to become effective August 1,

1996.

Columbia Gulf states that the revised

tariff sheets introduce two new services:

(1) A Pool Balancing Service which will

permit customers to schedule and

receive different volumes at pooling

points under Rate Schedules AS-Gulf

and IPP-Gulf; and (2) a Title Tracking

Service under which Columbia Gulf will

track pool-to-pool transfers of

nominated quantities when the points of

receipt and delivery are pooling points

established under Rate Schedules ASGulf and IPP-Gulf and are located

within the same rate zone. Further, the

revised tariff sheets include certain

revisions to Rate Schedules FTS–1,

FTS–2, ITS–1, ITS–2, AS-Gulf, and IPPGulf, and to the General Terms and

Conditions of Columbia’s Gulf’s

currently effective tariff.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Sections 385.214

and 385.211 of the Commission’s Rules

and Regulations. All such motions or

protests must be filed as provided in

Section 154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–16793 Filed 7–1–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP96–586–000]

Texas Eastern Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Application

June 26, 1996.

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation

(Texas Eastern), 5400 Westheimer Court,

Houston, Texas 77056–5310, filed in

Docket No. CP96–586–000 an

application pursuant to Section 7(b) of

the Natural Gas Act for permission and

approval to abandon by sale to Centana

Intrastate Pipeline Company (Centana)

the facilities known as Silsbee, Big Hill

and Line 14, located in Orange, Jasper,

Hardin, Newton and Jefferson Counties,

Texas, all as more fully set forth in the

application on file with the Commission

and open to public inspection.

Texas Eastern states that the Silsbee

facilities consist of Lines 2–F and 2–J

comprising 55.92 miles of various sized

pipeline ranging from 3.5 inches to 10

inches in diameter and associated with

meter stations. Texas Eastern further

states that the Big Hill facilities consist

of Line 8–A comprising 13.61 miles of

various sized pipeline ranging from

6.625 inches to 8.625 inches in diameter

and associated meter stations. In

addition, Texas Eastern states that Line

14 consists of 5.80 miles of 30-inch

pipeline paralleling a portion of Line 16

between the Beaumont, Texas

compressor station and the Vidor, Texas

compressor station.

It is stated that since June 1993,

throughput on the Silsbee facilities has

declined from 7.0 mdth per day to 5.5

mdth per day and is expected to

continue to decline in the future. It is

also stated that there has been no

recorded throughput on the Big Hill

facilities since December 1994. In

addition, it is stated that throughput on

Line 14 has averaged 1,280 dth per day

with current line utilization at under 1

percent. Texas Eastern states that

current production on the Silsbee

facilities will continue to be available to

Texas Eastern’s customers at no

additional transportation costs and that

the throughput on Line 14 will be

accommodated by another Texas

Eastern line.

Texas Eastern states that it has the

understanding that Centana will use the

facilities for access to additional

wellhead supplies of natural gas needed

by Centana to meet the requirements of

its intrastate customers, to increase its

reliability of service to its intrastate

customers, and to alleviate operational

constraints on its intrastate system.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said reference to said application

should on or before July 17, 1996, file

with the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a

motion to intervene or a protest in

accordance with the requirements of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211)

and the Regulations under the Natural

Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests

filed with the Commission will be

considered by it in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make the protestants parties

to the proceeding. Any person wishing

to become a party to a proceeding or to

participate as a party in any hearing

therein, must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

Rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in and subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas

Act and the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure, a hearing will

be held without further notice before the

Commission or its designee on this

application if no motion to intervene is

filed within the time required herein, if

the Commission on its own review of

the matter finds that permission and

approval for the proposed abandonment

are required by the public convenience

and necessity. If a motion for leave to

intervene is timely filed, or if the

Commission on its own motion believes

that a formal hearing is required, further

notice of such hearing will be duly

given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for Texas Eastern to appear

or be represented at the hearing.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–16791 Filed 7–1–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER96–1774–000, et al.]

Growth Unlimited Investments, Inc., et

al. Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

June 25, 1996.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Growth Unlimited Investments, Inc.

[Docket No. ER96–1774–000]

Take notice that on June 10, 1996,

Growth Unlimited Investments, Inc.

tendered for filing an amendment in the

above-referenced docket.

Comment date: July 9, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. City of Needles, California v. Nevada

Power Company

[Docket No. EL96–57–000]

Take notice that on June 6, 1996, the

City of Needles, California filed a

complaint concerning possible

nonperformance under contracts by

Nevada Power Company and Enova

Energy Management, Inc. The complaint