alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Vignette Holdings, L.L.C., organized under the laws of Delaware. 

Vignette USA, Inc. 

Vignette International, Inc., incorporated under thelaws of Delaware. 

Vignette Public Sector & Education, Inc. (formerly known as Vignette Federal Corporation), incorporated under the laws ofDelaware. 

Vignette Europe Limited, organized under the laws of the United Kingdom. 

Vignette SARL, organized under the laws of France. 

Vignette Deutschland GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany.

Vignette Software (Switzerland) GmbH, organized under the laws of Switzerland. 

Vignette Iberica S. L., organized under the laws of Spain. 

Vignette Italia Srl, organized under the laws of Italy.

Vignette B.V. (formerly known as OnDisplay Benelux B.V.), organized under the laws of Holland. 

Vignette Nordic AB, organized under the laws of Sweden. 

Vignette PtyLimited, organized under the laws of Australia. 

Vignette Software New Zealand Limited, organized under the laws of New Zealand. 

Vignette Hong Kong Limited, organized under the laws of Hong Kong. 

Vignette Asia Pte Ltd., organized under the laws of Singapore. 

Vignette India Pvt Ltd., organized under the laws of India. 

Vignette Software Development India Pvt Ltd., organized under the laws of India. 

Vignette de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C. V., organized under the laws of Mexico. 

Vignette do Brasil Ltda., organized under the laws of Brazil.

Vignette Canada Corporation, organized under the laws of Canada. 

Epicentric (BVI), Inc., incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands. 

Copper Australia Pty Limited, organized under the laws ofAustralia. 

Tower Technology Limited, organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 993 

Recognizing the service, professionalism, honor, and sacrifices of the Navy 

SEALs and their contribution to the national security of the United 

States, supporting the mission of the Navy SEALs, and encouraging 

the people of the United States to learn the history and mission of 

the Navy SEALs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. ROONEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the service, professionalism, honor, and sacrifices 

of the Navy SEALs and their contribution to the national security of the United States, supporting the mission of the Navy SEALs, and encouraging the people 

of the United States to learn the history and mission 

of the Navy SEALs. 

Whereas the members of the naval special operations forces, 

known as ‘‘Navy SEALs’’ because they are able to operate in sea, air, and land, bravely serve in combat operations around the world in support of the global war on 

terrorism; 

Whereas the Navy SEALs are the critical element of the special operations capability of the United States and have 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 993 IH 

retained the highest standard of loyalty, honor, and duty 

since their origin as Navy frogmen during World War II; 

Whereas the Navy SEALs are unmatched in their tactical 

proficiency and full-spectrum capability on the battlefield; 

and 

Whereas the Navy SEALs have made the greatest of sacrifices in the line of duty and repeatedly demonstrate 

their dedication and readiness to continue to make those 

sacrifices on behalf of the United States: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the service, professionalism, 

3 honor, and sacrifices of the Navy SEALs and their 

4 contributions to the national security of the United 

5 States; 

6 (2) supports the mission of the Navy SEALs in 

7 the global war on terrorism; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to learn the history and mission of the Navy SEALs. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
RICHARD M.A. LEE

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON

OFFENDER REVIEW

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 4460

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon Coun ty

. George S. Reynolds, III , Judge

.

Richard M.A. Lee, pro se

, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15462]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy Meeting

AGENCY: United States Information Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A meeting of the U.S. Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy 
will be held on June 19 in Room 600, 301 4th Street, S.W., Washington 
D.C. from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    At 10:00 the Commission will hold a panel discussion on NGOs and 
Public Diplomacy. It will examine the growing role of non-governmental 
organizations in foreign affairs. The panelists are Penn Kemble, Deputy 
Director, USIA; Ambassador William Rugh, Director, AMIDEAST Foundation; 
and Michael Clough, Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please call Betty Hayes, (202) 619-4468, if you are interested in 
attending the meeting. Space is limited and entrance to the building is 
controlled.

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
Rose Royal,
Management Analyst, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 96-15462 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
#### Eric Dwayne MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 09-95-184 CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Feb. 14, 1996.

*697Marilyn Adams, Beaumont, for appellant.

Tom Maness, Criminal District Attorney, Beaumont, Rodney D. Conerly, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Beaumont, for State.

Before WALKER, C.J., and BURGESS and STOVER, JJ.

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

Eric Dwayne Moore was charged with unlawfully carrying a weapon. He appeared and entered a pro se plea of no contest. The court found Moore guilty and assessed punishment at fourteen days in the Jefferson County Jail and a fine of $400. Moore retained an attorney and filed a motion for new trial. The court overruled the motion. Moore brings four points of error.

Three points allege error in the plea proceeding and the other alleges error in failing to grant a new trial. The first point claims error in not appointing counsel for Moore in violation of Tex.Code CRIM.PROC.Ann. art. 1.13(c) (Vernon 1979). The second claims error in failing to comply with the jury waiver provisions of article 1.13. The fourth claims error in conducting a bench trial when the state did not consent in writing to the waiver of a jury trial. The third alleges error in failing to grant a new trial based upon the allegations of error in points of error one and two.

The State urges Moore has waived all the non-jurisdictional defects occurring prior to the plea under the *Helms*rule reiterated in *Jack v. State,*871 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). However, in *Jack,*the court stated: “In any event, we have never extended the *Helms*rule to cover asserted error occurring at or after entry of a nonnegotiated plea.” 871 S.W.2d at 744. Therefore, we will review Moore’s complaints.

Under the first two points of error Moore urges article 1.13(c) mandates a defendant must have an attorney before a jury can be waived and, in this instance, since he had no attorney, the court was required to appoint an attorney for that purpose. Moore signed an instrument waiving both trial by jury and the right to be represented by an attorney. That document complied with Tex. Code CRIm.PROcAnn. art. 1.051(g) (Vernon 1986). The right to counsel may be waived. Tex.Code CRImJProcAnn. art. 1.051(f), art. 1.14(a) (Vernon 1986); *Robles v. State,*577 S.W.2d 699 (Tex.Crim.App.1979). Furthermore, there is a constitutional right to self-representation. *See Burgess v. State,*816 S.W.2d 424 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). We decline to adopt Moore’s contention that article 1.13(c) dictates counsel cannot be waived. Points of *error*one and two are overruled.

The failure of the state to consent, in writing, to the waiver of a jury does not constitute error *to a defendant or from which a defendant can complain. Shaffer v. State,*769 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Tex.Crim.App.1989); *compare State ex rel. Curry v. Carr,*847 S.W.2d 561 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). Point of error four is overruled.

Having found no error under the previous points, the trial court did not err in failing to grant a new trial based upon those allega*698tions. Point of error three is overruled. The judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-37347, 333-67659, 333-92707, 333-57500,333-70604, 333-104770, 333-116957 and 333-140833) of our report dated September 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Pervasive Software Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedJune 30, 2007. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Austin, Texas 

September 11, 2007
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 28.2



                        [THE CIT GROUP, INC. LETTERHEAD]



February 24, 2000



                             MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION

                        --------------------------------



As of and for the year ended December 31, 1999, The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc. and The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. (the Companies), both wholly owned
subsidiaries of The CIT Group, Inc., have complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and
for this same period, the Companies have in effect a fidelity bond and errors
and omissions policy in the amount of not less than $60 million and $6.5
million, respectively.

                                          The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc.
                                          The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.



                                          /s/ Thomas B. Hallman
                                          -----------------------------
                                          Thomas B. Hallman
                                          President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, K.M. MCDONALD, T.J. STINSON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SAMUEL N. KINYANJUI

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400055

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 14 November 2013.

Military Judge: LtCol L.J. Francis, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, Training Command, 

Quantico, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol M.E. Sayegh, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Capt David Peters, USMC.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller, Esq.

30 April 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted 

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence 

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3695 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3695

  To prohibit insurers from including provisions in health plans and 
 contracts with health care providers to indemnify the insurer against 
                             any liability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1996

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit insurers from including provisions in health plans and 
 contracts with health care providers to indemnify the insurer against 
                             any liability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care Accountability Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTS.

    A health plan, or a contract between an insurer and a health care 
provider, may not include provisions holding the health plan harmless 
from liability in any civil action arising out of medical care provided 
or withheld under the plan.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Insurer.--The term ``insurer'' means an insurance 
        company, insurance service, or insurance organization licensed 
        to engage in the business of insurance in a State, and a health 
        maintenance organization.
            (2) Health care provider.--The term ``health care 
        provider'' means a provider of services (as defined in section 
        1861(u) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u)), a 
        physician, a supplier, or any other person furnishing health 
        care, including a Federal or State program that provides 
        directly for the provision of health care to beneficiaries.''.
            (3) Health insurance coverage.--The term ``health insurance 
        coverage'' means any hospital or medical service policy or 
        certificate, hospital or medical service plan contract, or 
        health maintenance organization contract offered by an insurer.
            (4) Health plan.--The term ``health plan'' means a plan 
        that provides health insurance coverage.
            (5) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the 50 States, 
        the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana 
        Islands, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Guam.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of Manhattan Bancorp (the “Company”).

 

I, Terry Robinson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                             The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                             The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such reports.

 

Dated:  May 11, 2011

 

 
|   | /s/   Terry L. Robinson   |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | Terry   Robinson          |
|   | President   and           |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34859-34860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[OR-030-06-1220-00: GP6-0196]


Notice of Meetings of Southeastern Oregon Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Vale District, Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is given that a meeting of the Southeastern Oregon 
Resource Advisory Council will be held August 5, 1996 from 8:00 a.m. to 
9:00 p.m. and August 6 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon at the Jordan 
Valley Lions Club Room, 902 Bassett Street, Jordan Valley, Oregon.
    At an appropriate time, the Council will recess for approximately 
one hour for lunch and one and one-half hours for dinner. Public 
comments will be received from 7:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., August 6, 1996. 
Topics to be discussed during the meeting are administrative activities 
of the Council, the Southeastern Oregon Resource Management Plan, and 
the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project.
    Notice is given that a meeting of the Southeastern Oregon Resource 
Advisory Council will be held September 19, 1996 from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 
p.m. and September 20 from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon at the Harney County 
Museum Club Room, 18 West ``D'' Street, Burns, Oregon.
    At an appropriate time, the Council will recess for approximately 
one and one-half hours for dinner. Public comments will be received 
from 7:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., September 19, 1996. Topics to be discussed 
during the meeting are administrative activities of the Council, the 
Southeastern Oregon Resource Management Plan, and the Interior Columbia 
Basin Ecosystem Management Plan.

DATES: The Southeastern Oregon Resource Advisory Council meeting will 
begin at 8:00 a.m. and continue to 9:00 p.m., August 5 and, 8:00 a.m. 
to 12:00 noon on August 6, 1996.

[[Page 34860]]

    The Southeastern Oregon Resource Advisory Council meeting will 
begin at 1:00 p.m. and continue to 9:00 p.m., September 19, and 8:00 
a.m. to 12:00 noon on September 20, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The Southeastern Oregon Resource Advisory Council meeting 
will take place in the Jordan Valley Lions Club Room, 902 Bassett 
Street, Jordan Valley, Oregon.
    The Southeastern Oregon Resource Advisory Council meeting will take 
place in the Harney County Museum Club Room, 18 West ``D'' Street, 
Burns, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonne Hower, Bureau of Land 
Management, Vale District, 100 Oregon Street, Vale, OR 97918 (Telephone 
541-473-3144).
Geoffrey B. Middaugh,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-16899 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
2:09-cr-20039-AJT-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 02/27/09 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 37
2:09-cr-20039-AJT-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 02/27/09 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 38
2:09-cr-20039-AJT-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 02/27/09 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 39
2:09-cr-20039-AJT-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 02/27/09 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 40
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAUL FRANK KATONKA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 92 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of August, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and the Applications for Relief are DENIED

.
Order entered July 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00224-CV

CHRISTINE FLORES DESIO D/B/A PROFESSIONAL CENTER OF GRAND PRAIRIE 

AND FRANCIS ANTHONY DESIO, JR. A/K/A FRANK DESIO, INDIVIDUALLY,

Appellants

V.

MIKE DEL BOSQUE D/B/A INJURY AND REHAB CENTER IN GRAND PRAIRIE,

Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04408

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s July 23, 2019 motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief with 

the sur-reply brief attached as an exhibit to the motion. We GRANT the motion. Appellee shall 

separately file the sur-reply brief within ten days of the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50358

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PRISCILLA LEE RASCO, also known as Priscilla Rasco,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-974-3

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Priscilla Lee Rasco has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Rasco has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50358 Document: 00513883063 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-50358

2

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50358 Document: 00513883063 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17084]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-277-001]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

June 28, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 25, 1996, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Seventh 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following corrected tariff sheet to become 
effective July 15, 1996:

First Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 278.

    Southern states that the tariff sheet is being filed to correct an 
inadvertent error contained on First Revised Sheet No. 278 submitted by 
Southern as part of its filing made in the captioned docket on June 14, 
1996.
    Southern states that copies of this filing have been served on all 
shippers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR Section 385.211). All such 
protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96-17084 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M