UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case No. 07-20513 

Plaintiff, Honorable David M. Lawson

v.

BRYAN ROSS and ROBERT BURSTON,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

JUDGMENT OF CONTEMPT AND SENTENCE

The matter comes before the Court on the motion by the government for a finding that

Djanada Montgomery is guilty of civil contempt. Ms. Montgomery was subpoenaed by the

government as a witness in the above-captioned case. Ms. Montgomery appeared in Court on

February 9, 2009, and gave testimony. The government had not completed its examination of Ms.

Montgomery, so the Court ordered her to return to the Court the following morning, February 10,

2009, at 8:00 a.m, to give testimony. When she did not appear, the government filed a motion

asking the Court to enter an order demanding Ms. Montgomery to appear before the Court and show

cause why she should not be held in contempt. The Court issued a warrant for the arrest of Ms.

Montgomery, which was executed by the United States Marshal’s Service for the Eastern District

of Michigan on February 11, 2009. On that date, Ms. Montgomery was brought before the Court

to show cause why she should not be held in contempt. At the show cause hearing, Ms.

Montgomery admitted that she did not appear before the Court as ordered, stating that she stayed

at home to care for her sick children, but she acknowledged her children were cared for now and she

failed to appear in Court the following day hoping to avoid testifying. On February 11, 2009, the

witness completed her testimony in the above-captioned case and was discharged from her

2:09-mc-50158-DML-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 02/11/09 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 9
-2-

subpoena.

Title 18, Section 401 of the United States Code provides that the Court shall have the power

to punish by fine or imprisonment any “[d]isobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order,

rule, decree, or command.” 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). After hearing testimony from Ms. Montgomery at

the show cause hearing, the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that Ms. Montgomery is

guilty of civil contempt for willfully refusing to obey the Court’s order that she appear to testify on

February 10, 2009.

An order of civil contempt may be used to “compensate for injuries caused by

non-compliance.” TWM Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Dura Corp., 722 F.2d 1261, 1273 (6th Cir. 1983). The

Court finds that Ms. Montgomery’s disobedience to this Court’s order caused the United States

Marshal’s Service to incur the expense of serving and executing an arrest warrant on Ms.

Montgomery on February 11, 2009 and transporting her to Court. Therefore, the Court will direct

Ms. Montgomery to compensate the Marshal’s Service for this expense.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that respondent Djanada Montgomery

is in contempt of the United States District Court.

It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 401 that

respondent Montgomery shall reimburse the United States Marshal’s Service for the Eastern District

of Michigan for its expenses relating to executing a search warrant, in the amount of $180.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: February 11, 2009

2:09-mc-50158-DML-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 02/11/09 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 10
-3-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on February 11, 2009.

s/Felicia M. Moses 

FELICIA M. MOSES

2:09-mc-50158-DML-MKM Doc # 3 Filed 02/11/09 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 11