alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                                      
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                          
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                           
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                    

I, Richard W. Donaldson, the Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of Pengram Corporation (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2011, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      

| | By:    | /s/ Richard W. Donaldson       
| | ------ | -------------------------------
| |        |                                
| | Name:  | RICHARD W. DONALDSON           
| |        |                                
| | Title: | Principal Executive Officer and
| |        | Principal Financial Officer    
| |        |                                
| | Date:  | July 20, 2011                  
| |        |                                

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Casey Container Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry
W. Neild, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Terry W. Neild
                                    ------------------------------------
                                    Terry W. Neild
                                    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                    November 15, 2010

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1730

SHARON MAYHEW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99- 975-DKC) Submitted: October 24, 2000 Decided: November 17, 2000 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen F. Shea, WILLONER, CALABRESE & ROSEN, P.A., College Park, Maryland, for Appellant. Charlotte J. Hardnett, Acting General Counsel, Frank V. Smith, III, Acting Principal Deputy General Counsel, John M. Sacchetti, Associate General Counsel for Program Litigation, Etzion Brand, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIALSECURITY ADMINISTRATION; Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000). 2 PER CURIAM: Sharon Mayhew appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner of Social Security on her claim for disability benefits. * Having reviewed the briefs and the administrative record, we find that substantial evidence supportedthe Administrative Law Judge’s decision denying benefits. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayhew v. Apfel , No. CA-99-975-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Pauline SPRATT, Claimant/Appellant, v. RAVARINO & FRESCHI, INC., Employer-Respondent.

No. 70637.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for Claimant/Appellant.

Todd D. Hilliker, St. Louis, for Employer-Respondent.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Allison N. Bartle, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for Second Injury Fund.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Pauline Spratt appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s affirmance of the Administrative Law Judge’s decision finding that she was only partially disabled and not entitled to benefits from the second injury fund. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Summons in a Civil Case

Weather Underground,

Incorporated,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:09−cv−10756−MOB−VMM

Hon. Marianne O Battani

Navigation Catalyst Systems,

Incorporated, et al.,

Defendant(s).

Notice to Defendant Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated

This summons is notification that you are being sued by the above named plaintiff(s). You are

required to:

1. Serve upon the plaintiff's attorney:

Craig E. Schaefer

810 Cottageview Drive

Suite G−20

Traverse City, MI

49684

an answer to the complaint within twenty (20) days after receiving this summons, or

take other actions that are permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. File with the court any answer that you serve on the parties to this action within the time

limits specified.

Failure to answer or take other actions permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may

result in the issuance of a judgment by default against you for the relief demanded in the

complaint.

David J. Weaver, Clerk of Court By: s/ L. Behringer 

Deputy Clerk

Date of Issuance: February 27, 2009

Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al Doc. 

Dockets.Justia.com
Summons and Complaint Return of Service

Case No. 2:09−cv−10756−MOB−VMM

Hon. Marianne O Battani

A copy of the Summons and Complaint has been served upon the Defendant in the manner

indicated below:

Name of Defendant Served: Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated

Date of Service:

Method of Service

Personally served at this address:

Left copies at defendant's usual place of abode with (name of person):

Other (specify):

Returned unexecuted (reason):

Service Fees: Travel $ Service $ Total $ 

Declaration of Server

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Return of Service is

true and correct.

Name of Server:

Signature of Server:

Date:

Server's Address:
#### Thomas M. KERR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Peter DUBOWSKY; et al., Defendants—Appellees, and Citibank, (South Dakota) N. A.; et al., Defendants.

No. 03-15156. D.C. No. CV-02-00712-PMP(LRL).

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 2003.*

Decided July 24, 2003.

Before LEAVY, HAWKINS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Thomas M. Kerr appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his ac*657tion alleging that attorney Peter Dubowsky (“Dubowksy”) violated the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, while attempting to recover credit card debt Kerr owed to Citibank. We review de novo both summary judgment and dismissal for failure to state a claim. *See Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kerr’s 15 U.S.C. § 1692e claim and properly granted summary judgment on Kerr’s 15 U.S.C. § 1692g claims because he failed to file his suit within one year of Dubowsky’s alleged violations. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d); *see also Naas v. Stolman,*130 F.3d 892, 893 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that when the alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692(b) is the filing of a lawsuit, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date the lawsuit is filed).

The district court properly dismissed Kerr’s 15 U.S.C. § 1692c(c) claim because Kerr’s complaint did not allege that he disputed the debt in writing or requested Dubowsky to cease communications with him. *See*15 U.S.C. § 1692c(c). The district court properly dismissed Kerr’s 15 U.S.C. § 1692d claim because his complaint alleged that Dubowsky’s May 2001 call was “unwanted” but failed to allege facts that it was intended to “harass, oppress, or abuse.” *See*15 U.S.C. § 1692d.

We decline to consider Kerr’s contention that he was denied discovery because he neither moved for additional time to conduct discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) nor demonstrated that the information he sought would have precluded summary judgment. See *Weinberg v. Whatcom County,*241 F.3d 746, 751 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 45 Att. 22

Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

April 12, 2024

SC-2024-0140

Ex parte Tavarus Jerome Jackson PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: 

Tavarus Jerome Jackson v. State of Alabama) (Jefferson Circuit Court: 

CC-17-2070; Criminal Appeals: CR-2022-1032).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on April 12, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Cook, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, 

Sellers, and Stewart, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
EXHIBIT 23.3



CONSENT OF CROWE CHIZEK AND COMPANY LLC





We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to the incorporation by reference on Forms S-3 (Reg. No. 333-109363 and 333-130363) and Forms S-8 (Reg. No. 333-128814, 333-132897 and 333-140384) of Sun American Bancorp of our report dated March 26, 2007 with respect to the financial statements of Independent Community Bank as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the years then ended.





/s/ CROWECHIZEKANDCOMPANYLLC

CROWECHIZEKANDCOMPANYLLC



Fort Lauderdale, Florida

March 26, 2007
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer, as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers third
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/ John E. Van ZeeJohn E. Van Zee,President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.01   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Endeavor Power Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brandon Toth, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Brandon Toth By: Brandon Toth Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: November 16, 2009  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6435

EDGHILL LEO FRANCIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-02-129-AM)

Submitted: May 24, 2002 Decided: June 17, 2002

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edghill Leo Francis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Edghill Leo Francis appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, in which he

challenged conditions of his confinement, without prejudice.

Because Francis may amend his complaint to proceed under 42

U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) rather than § 2241, the district

court’s dismissal without prejudice is not a final order and is not

subject to appellate review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.2d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Therefore, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss this

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 13
                                              SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

In accordance with section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
May 31, 1997, the Money Store Auto Finance, Inc. reports the following
information pertaining to Series 1997- 2, for the calendar year 1997.

A. Information Regarding Monthly Distribution:

  I.  NOTES

  (a) The aggregate amount of the distribution
      with respect to:
         Class A-1 Notes                                    46,200,416.29
         Class A-2 Notes                                     2,292,193.75

  (b) The amount of the distribution set forth in 
      A. 1. (a) above in respect of interest on:
         Class A-1 Notes                                     5,167,017.52
         Class A-2 Notes                                     2,292,193.75

  (c) The amount of the distribution set forth in 
      A. 1. (a) above in respect of principal of:
         Class A-1 Notes                                    34,663,920.57
         Class A-2 Notes                                    0

   II.  CERTIFICATES

   (a)  The aggregate amount of the distribution to
        Certificateholders                                    174,300.00

   (b)  The amount of the distribution set forth in  
        A. II. (a) above in respect of interest on 
        the Certificates                                      174,300.00

   (c)  The amount of the distribution set forth in  
        A. II. (a) above in respect of principal on 
       the Certificates                                       0

    2.  SERVICING FEE

    (a) The aggregate amount of the Servicing Fee paid to 
        the Servicer with respect to the preceding Monthly 
        Period from the Collection Account                   1,980,985.47

    3.   OTHER FEES

    (a)  The aggregate amount of trustee fees paid to the 
         Trustee from the Collection Account                     1,458.31

    (b)  The aggregate amount of insurance premium paid
         to the Security Insurer from the Collection Account   261,252.00

By:   /S/ HARRY PUGLISI
      ------------------
       Harry Puglisi
       Treasuruer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ATMI, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Douglas A. Neugold
and Daniel P. Sharkey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Douglas A. Neugold
---------------------------------------------
Name:   Douglas A. Neugold
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 10, 2006

/s/ Daniel P. Sharkey
---------------------------------------------
Name:  Daniel P. Sharkey
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 10, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2 Section 906 Certification for Chief Financial Officer



                                      Certification



I, Jeffery Joyce,  the Chief Financial  Officer of Heartland  Bancshares,  Inc.,
certify  that (i) the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the Annual  period ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the  information  contained in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual  period ended  December 31, 2003
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.




                                          __/s/ Jeffery D. Joyce  ____



                                          _Jeffery D. Joyce___________



                                          _March 29, 2004 ____________