T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T JU A N C A R L O S A L C O R -L A R O J, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71262 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 834- 724 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jua n C a r l os A l c or - L a r oj , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , a nd pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve 

# FI LED OC T 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71262 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo que s t i ons of l aw , i nc l udi ng du e p r o c e s s c la im s , se e V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 32 4 F . 3d 11 05 , 10 07 (9th C i r. 2003) , e xc e ptt o the e xt e nttha tde f e r e nc e i s ow e d t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on of the g o v e rn in g s ta tu te s a n dr e g u la tio n s , se e S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 371 F . 3d 532, 535 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s . See Zehat

ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1184- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . W e de nythe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. A l cor- L ar oj cont ends he i s e l i gi bl e f or as ylum and w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al ba s e d on hi s m e m be r s hi p i n apa rt i c ul ars oc i a l gr oup, na m e l y , y oung m a l e s w ho h a v e b e e n p r e v io u s lytar g e te db yG u a te m a lan g an g s , an db a s e do n h is f a m ilia l tie s . S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatthe robb ery by asuspec t ed g a n g m e m b e rw a s c r im in a l in n a tu r e a n dn o t o n a c c o u n t o f ap r o te c te dg r o u n d . See G o rm le yv . A s h c r o

ft , 3 6 4 F .3 d1 1 7 2 , 1 1 7 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) ( r an d o m c r im in a l a c ts b o r e n o n e x u s to ap r o te c te dg r o u n d ) ; se e al so Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F . 3d 7 3 8 , 7 4 5 - 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( r e je c tin g a s ap artic u lars o c ia l g r o up “y o u n g m e n in E l S a l va dorr e s i s t i ng ga ng vi ol e nc e ” ) . S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the a g e n c y ’s f

in d in g th a t A lc o r - L a r o

j f a ile dto e s tab lis h th a t g an g m e m b e r s k ille dh is c o u s in o n a c c o u n t o f

ap r o te c te dg r o u n da n ds o u g h t to h arm h im o n a c c o u n t o f h is f a m ilia l r e la tio n s h ip w ith h is c o u s in . Se e I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 502 U . S . 478,09- 71262 3 483- 84 ( 1992) . A c c or di ngl y , w e de nythe pe t i t i on a s t o A l c or - L ar oj ’ s a s y l um and w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m s. Al c o r - L a r o

j h a s n o tr a i s e da n yc h a l l e n g e t o th e a g e n c y ’ s d e n i a l o f C AT r e lie f . See M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s not spec i fi ca l l y r ai se d and ar gu ed i n a party’ s openi ng bri ef ar e w ai ved). B e c aus e A l c or - L a r oj c onc e de d s e rvi c e of hi s N ot i c e t o A ppe ar , a dm i tt e d the factu al al l eg at i o n s th erei n , an dco n ced edrem o v ab i l i ty, w e rej ecth i s du e p ro cess c o n te n tio n . See Koh l iv. G on zales , 473 F . 3d 1061, 1068- 69 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( no due proces s vi ol at i on w here no prej ud i ce show n). F i nal l y, A l cor- L ar oj ’ s c l ai m thatthe agency di d n otful l y c on si der e vi dence of c ountryc ondi t i ons i n G ua t e m a l af a i l s be c aus e he ha s notove r c om e the p r e s u m p tio n th a t it r e v ie w e dth e r e c o r d . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 439 F . 3d 592, 60 3 (9th C i r. 20 06 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.