alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANY'S
        CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
        31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
        CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001042814
<NAME>                        OMEGA RESEARCH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         2,175,852
<SECURITIES>                                   1,695,304
<RECEIVABLES>                                  43,228,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                   29,533,000
<INVENTORY>                                    67,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,294,969
<PP&E>                                         5,357,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,745,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,379,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,904,884
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       244,751
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,230,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,379,767
<SALES>                                        33,767,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               42,869,969
<CGS>                                          2,985,409
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  32,037,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (445,535)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               5,721,857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,691,185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                879,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,846,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (966,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (966,609)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ecoland
      International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2008, I, David
      Wallace, Chief Executive Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
      that:




1.  Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2008,
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
      quarter ending August 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of Ecoland International,
      Inc.




Dated:
      October 29, 2008.


/s/ David
                WallaceDavid Wallace, Chief Executive Officer
                of
                Ecoland International, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3899 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3899

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the 
 waiting period for disability benefits shall not be applicable in the 
    case of a disabled individual suffering from a terminal illness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 1996

 Mr. Lipinski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that the 
 waiting period for disability benefits shall not be applicable in the 
    case of a disabled individual suffering from a terminal illness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM WAITING PERIOD FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS 
              SUFFERING FROM TERMINAL ILLNESS.

    (a) In General.--The first sentence of section 223(a)(1) of the 
Social Security Act is amended, in clause (ii) thereof--
            (1) by inserting ``(I)'' immediately after ``but only if'', 
        and
            (2) by inserting ``or (II) he has a terminal illness (as 
        defined in subsection (e)),'' immediately after ``the first 
        month in which he is under such disability,''.
    (b) Definition of Terminal Illness.--Section 223 of such Act is 
further amended by adding at the end thereof the following new 
subsection:

                    ``Definition of Terminal Illness

    ``(e) As used in this section, the term `terminal illness' means, 
in the case of any individual, a medically determinable physical 
impairment which is expected to result in the death of such individual 
within the next 12 months.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to 
benefits for months ending before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act with respect to which a waiting period (as 
defined in section 223(c)(2) of the Social Security Act) ending after 
such date would otherwise apply.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

COLUMBUS JAMES,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 09-CV-11230

vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk has submitted a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) in which he recommends that the court grant defendant’s motion to dismiss as to plaintiff’s

age and gender discrimination claims and that the court grant defendant’s motion for summary

judgment as to plaintiff’s race discrimination and retaliation claims. Neither party has filed

objections to the R&R and the time to do so has expired. The court has reviewed the R&R and

believes that the magistrate judge has correctly analyzed all of the issues and that his

recommendation is sound. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk’s R&R is hereby accepted and

adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss [docket entry 18]

is granted as to plaintiff’s age and gender discrimination claims.
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment [docket

entry 20] is granted as to plaintiff’s race discrimination and retaliation claims.

S/Bernard A. Friedman____

Dated: August 5, 2010 BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

Detroit, Michigan SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document 

was served upon counsel of record by electronic and/or first-class mail.

S/Carol Mullins 

Case Manager to Judge Friedman
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                                           |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   |                                                                           |   |
| Date:       May 17, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Kent      Kiefer                                                      |   |
|                          |   | Kent      Kiefer, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial      officer |   |
|                          |   |                                                                           |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 15, 2011
    /s/ Ricardo Figueiredo BomenyRicardo Figueiredo BomenyChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief  Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RASHEEN GRAYSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 540 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of February, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R ON AL D L . VE R T I N, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. T E R R Y L . G O D D A R D , F orm erA tt orney G e n e r a l o f

th e S ta te o f

A r iz o n a ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 15026 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 1 1 6 7 - G MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona G . M urr a yS now , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ona l d L . V e rt i n appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt d is m is s in g h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g v a r io u s c o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n s in c onne c t i on w i th the c i vi l f or f e i tur e of hi s pr ope rty . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28



# FI LED NO V 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 15026 2 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew for an abu se of di sc re t i on the di stri ctcourt ’ s di sm i ss al f o rf a ilu r e to c o m p lyw ith ac o u rt o r d e r . P a g ta lu n a n v. G a la za , 291 F . 3d 639, 640 ( 9th C i r . 2002) . W e r e ve r s e a nd r e m a nd. T h e d istrict co u rt issu ed an o rd erto sh o w ca u se (“O S C ”) as to w h y V er ti n ’s a c tio n s h o u ldn o t b e d is m is s e df o rf a ilu r e to s e rv e d e f

e n d a n ts in atim e lym a n n e r . B e f o r e th e O S C d e a d lin e , V e rtin f ile ds e rv ic e d o c u m e n ts th a t h e ap p a r e n tly thoughtc ons t i tut e d as uf f i c i e ntr e s pons e . H ow e ve r , the di s tr i c tc ourtdi s m i s s e d f or f a i l ur e t o c om pl yw i th the O S C w i thouta na l y s i s , f urthe ropportuni tyt o r e s pond, or expl orat i on of l es s har sh al t ernat i ves. U nd erthese ci rc um st ance s, w e c on cl ud e that d is m is s a l w a s a n ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n . Se e i d. a t 6 4 2 - 4 3 & n .4 ( lis tin g f a c to r s to c ons i de rbe f

or e di s m i s s i ng f

orf a i l ur e t o c om pl yw i th ac ourtor de ra nd e xpl a i ni ng th a t le s s d r a s tic a lte rn a tiv e s m u s t b e p u r s u e da f te rd is o b e d ie n c e ) ; O l i v a v . Sul l i v an , 9 5 8 F .2 d2 7 2 , 2 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 2 ) ( “B e c au s e d is m is s a l is ah a r s h p e n a lty , it s h o u ld b e i m p o s e da s as a n c t i o n o n l yi n e x tr e m e c i r c u m s t a n c e s . ” ) . Ac c o r d i n g l y , we r e v e r s e a n dr e m a n df

o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s c o n s is te n t w ith o u rd is p o s itio n . RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Application for Incidental Take Permit for Pecos Gambusia, etc.; 
Texas

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Receipt of Application for Incidental Take Permit for 
Surveying the Species Listed Below within the State of Texas.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPLICANT: Andrew Sansom, Austin, Texas.

SUMMARY: Andrew Sansom has applied to the Fish and Wildlife Service 
(Service) for an incidental take permit pursuant to Section 10(A)1(a) 
of the Endangered Species Act, for the purpose of scientific research 
and enhancement of propogation and survival of the species as 
prescribed by Service recovery documents. The applicant has been 
assigned permit number PRT-814933. The requested permit, which is for a 
period of 2 years, would authorize incidental take of the following 
endangered species:

    1. Pecos gambusia (Gambusia nobilis)
    2. Houston toad (Bufo Houstonensis)
    3. Golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia)
    4. Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis)
    5. Louisiana black bear (Ursus americanus luteolus)
    6. Ocelot (Felis pardalis)
    7. Jaguarundi (Felis yagouaroundi cacomitli)
    8. One flowering plant within the State

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the application may obtain a copy 
by writing to the Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 
87103. The request must be received by the Assistant Regional Director 
within 30 days of the date of this publication. Please refer to permit 
number PRT-814933 when submitting comments.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice.
Lynn B. Starnes,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 96-17395 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-55-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAUL FRANK KATONKA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and the Applications for Relief are DENIED.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-1736

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Arkansas.

Joe Mack Pool, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 18, 2008

Filed: January 24, 2008 

___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joe Mack Pool (Pool) appeals the prison sentence the district court imposed

following remand. We again remand for resentencing. 

Pool was found guilty of conspiring to commit bribery and money laundering,

and multiple counts of aiding and abetting bribery and money laundering. His

Guidelines imprisonment range was 33-41 months. After considering dozens of

character letters, the testimony of several supportive witnesses, and each 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factor, the district court sentenced Pool to 5 years of probation, with the first

year to be served in a halfway house. The court relied in particular on the value of

preserving Pool’s business and his employees’ jobs, the need for Pool to continue his
-2-

significant charitable activities, and the existence of his medical problems. See United

States v. Pool, 474 F.3d 1127, 1128-29 (8th Cir. 2007). 

The government appealed, and this court vacated the probationary sentence as

an unreasonable variance, noting that while the circumstances the district court relied

on were “appropriate considerations, the court gave too much weight” to these factors,

which did “not justify a variance of this magnitude,” and gave insufficient weight to

other section 3553(a) factors, such as the need to avoid unwarranted sentence

disparities. See id. at 1129-30.

On remand, without addressing the grounds Pool asserted in support of a

variance, the district court sentenced him to 33 months in prison. The court stated

only that it had “carefully considered the guidelines,” and that it had “an affirmative

duty” to impose a sentence that would meet the need to promote respect for the law,

protect the public, deter criminal conduct, and provide opportunities for treatment.

After careful review, we are concerned the district court’s decision to

resentence Pool within the Guidelines range--without even mentioning the factors it

had previously cited as grounds for a variance--may indicate that the court felt

constrained to do so by the remanding opinion. The district court’s discretion was not

so limited, however, as the Supreme Court subsequently made clear in Gall v. United

States, 128 S. Ct. 586, 602 (2007) (explaining that an appellate court must give “due

deference to the District Court’s reasoned and reasonable decision that the § 3553(a)

factors, on the whole, justified the sentence,” rather than “decide de novo whether the

justification for a variance is sufficient or the sentence reasonable”). 

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing in light of Gall. 

______________________________
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 1 of 38 Pg ID 1436
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 2 of 38 Pg ID 1437
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 3 of 38 Pg ID 1438
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 4 of 38 Pg ID 1439
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 5 of 38 Pg ID 1440
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 6 of 38 Pg ID 1441
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 7 of 38 Pg ID 1442
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 8 of 38 Pg ID 1443
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 9 of 38 Pg ID 1444
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 10 of 38 Pg ID 1445
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 11 of 38 Pg ID 1446
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 12 of 38 Pg ID 1447
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 13 of 38 Pg ID 1448
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 14 of 38 Pg ID 1449
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 15 of 38 Pg ID 1450
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 16 of 38 Pg ID 1451
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 17 of 38 Pg ID 1452
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 18 of 38 Pg ID 1453
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 19 of 38 Pg ID 1454
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 20 of 38 Pg ID 1455
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 21 of 38 Pg ID 1456
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 22 of 38 Pg ID 1457
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 23 of 38 Pg ID 1458
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 24 of 38 Pg ID 1459
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 25 of 38 Pg ID 1460
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 26 of 38 Pg ID 1461
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 27 of 38 Pg ID 1462
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 28 of 38 Pg ID 1463
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 29 of 38 Pg ID 1464
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 30 of 38 Pg ID 1465
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 31 of 38 Pg ID 1466
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 32 of 38 Pg ID 1467
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 33 of 38 Pg ID 1468
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 34 of 38 Pg ID 1469
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 35 of 38 Pg ID 1470
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 36 of 38 Pg ID 1471
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 37 of 38 Pg ID 1472
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 66-15 Filed 11/19/10 Pg 38 of 38 Pg ID 1473
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.2 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.3 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.4 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.5 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.6 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.7 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.8 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.9 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.10 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:09-cv-11474-DML-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 04/20/09 PageID.11 Page 11 of 11
Coronus Solar Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST    

ADDENDUM TO INSTALLMENT NOTE      

TO CONTRACT CONCERNING THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS:

 20 ACRES at 0 Fort Cady Road, Newberry Springs, CA 92365

 Coronus Solar Inc. and Mike Hoch, dba Seized Property, agree to extend the Installment Note to March 1, 2015. All  other terms remain the same, and monthly interest will continue to be paid throughout the extension.         

DATED EFFECTIVE: May 9, 2013

 

 BUYER:

___________________________________

/s/ CORONUS SOLAR INC.                  

[purchaser’s signature above/printed name below]

CORONUS SOLAR INC.         

 

SELLER:

____________________________________

/s/ MIKE HOCH

 [seller’s signature above/printed name below]

MIKE HOCH, DBA SEIZED PROPERTY