alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL VANCE,

Petitioner,

 CASE NO. 09-cv-11475

v.

 HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

JEFF WOODS,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

THE COURT TO ABSTAIN FROM RULING ON HIS CASE(Dkt. #11)

This is a habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner commenced

this action on April 20, 2009, by filing a pro se habeas corpus petition challenging his

criminal-sexual-conduct conviction in Oakland County case number 03-192752-FH.

Ten days before petitioner filed his habeas petition in this case, he filed a habeas

petition challenging his criminal-sexual-conduct convictions in Oakland County case

number 03-193604-FC. See Vance v. Scutt, No. 09-cv-11368 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 10,

2009). On October 30, 2009, the Court consolidated the two habeas cases, dismissed

this case, and directed the parties to file any future documents in case number 09-cv11368. See Dkt. #7. 

The Court subsequently granted relief in case number 09-cv-11368. The Court

held that (1) petitioner was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel in Oakland

County case number 03-193604-FC and (2) the state trial court failed to clearly advise

petitioner of his right to appeal his conviction in Oakland County case number 03-

192752-FH. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed this

2:09-cv-11475-GCS-CEB Doc # 14 Filed 12/10/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 99
Court’s grant of habeas relief and restoration of appellate rights based on ineffective

assistance of appellate counsel, but reversed this Court’s grant of habeas relief based

on notice of appellate rights. See Vance v. Scutt, No. 12-1345 (6th Cir. July 17, 2014). 

On remand, this Court held petitioner’s habeas corpus petition in abeyance pending the

completion of his appeal of right in the State’s appellate courts. 

Currently pending before the Court is petitioner’s motion for the Court to abstain

from ruling on his habeas case while he pursues his appeal in state court. As noted

above, this case has been consolidated with case number 09-cv-11368 and

administratively closed. Furthermore, the Court granted petitioner’s identical request in

case number 09-cv-11368. See Vance v. Scutt, No. 09-cv-11368, Dkt. #30 (E.D. Mich.

Aug. 22, 2014). Therefore, petitioner’s Motion for Court to Abstain from Ruling (Dkt.

#11) is DENIED as moot. Petitioner is reminded to file any future documents pertaining

to his habeas petition in case number 09-cv-11368.

Dated: December 10, 2014

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

December 10, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and

also on Michael Vance #501288, Gus Harrison Correctional

Facility, 2727 E. Beecher Street, Adrian, MI 49221.

s/Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk

2

2:09-cv-11475-GCS-CEB Doc # 14 Filed 12/10/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 100
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Leonard Steinmetz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 17th day of May 2010.





LEONARD STEINMETZ

Leonard Steinmetz

Chief Financial Officer
#### V. Marvelene PANKEY, Appellant, v. John P. O’CONNOR, Respondent.

No. WD 48499.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 7, 1995.

V. Marvalene Pankey, pro se.

Randa Rawlins, Laura E. Thompson, Niewald, Waldeck & Brown, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

Appeal arises from dismissal with prejudice of Appellant’s First Amended Petition for defamation for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Spherion Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy G. Krause, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark W. Smith, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ ROY G.  KRAUSE               |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Roy G. Krause                    |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| February 23, 2007                |   |

 
| /s/ MARK  W. SMITH                                |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark W. Smith                                     |   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| February 23, 2007                            |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3786 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3786

     To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the 
  unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative 
   provision subject to section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 1996

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To make clear that the definition of a base period, under the 
  unemployment compensation law of a State, is not an administrative 
   provision subject to section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFYING PROVISION.

    (a) In General.--No provision of a State law under which the base 
period for such State is defined or otherwise determined shall, for 
purposes of section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
503(a)(1)), be considered a provision for a method of administration.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms ``State 
law'', ``base period'', and ``State'' shall have the respective 
meanings assigned to them under section 205 of the Federal-State 
Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note).
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall apply for purposes of any 
period beginning before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3609

To authorize appropriations for the payment of United States arrearages

in assessed contributions to the United Nations for prior years and

to authorize appropriations for the payment of assessed contributions

of the United States for United Nations peacekeeping operations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1996

Mr. SHAYS (for himself and Mr. FARR of California) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To authorize appropriations for the payment of United States

arrearages in assessed contributions to the United Nations for prior years and to authorize appropriations

for the payment of assessed contributions of the United

States for United Nations peacekeeping operations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 ARREARAGES IN ASSESSED CONTRIBUTIONS

5 TO THE UNITED NATIONS FOR PRIOR YEARS.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, there are

7 authorized to be appropriated $11,195,000 for fiscal year
2

•HR 3609 IH

1 1997, $11,198,000 for fiscal year 1998, $11,202,000 for

2 fiscal year 1999, $11,208,000 for fiscal year 2000, and

3 $11,212,000 for fiscal year 2001, for ‘‘Assessed Contribu4 tions for International Organizations’’ only for the pay5 ment of arrearages in assessed contributions of the United

6 States to the United Nations for prior years.

7 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR CON8 TRIBUTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE9 KEEPING ACTIVITIES.

10 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Notwith11 standing any other provision of law, there are authorized

12 to be appropriated for ‘‘Contributions for International

13 Peacekeeping Activities’’, $122,234,000 for each of the

14 fiscal years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

15 (b) LIMITATION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBU16 TIONS.—Funds authorized to be appropriated by sub17 section (a) shall not be available for the payment of the

18 United States assessed contribution for a United Nations

19 peacekeeping operation in an amount which is greater

20 than 25 percent of the total of all assessed contributions

21 for that operation.

22 SEC. 3. AUTHORITY OF THE PRESIDENT TO WITHHOLD THE

23 PAYMENT OF FUNDS.

24 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President may withhold the

25 payment of any appropriated funds, authorized to be ap-
3

•HR 3609 IH

1 propriated by this Act, if the President determines that

2 the United Nations has failed to implement or to continue

3 to implement consensus-based decisionmaking procedures

4 on budgetary matters which assure that sufficient atten5 tion is paid to the views of the United States and other

6 member states that are the major financial contributors

7 to the United Nations.

8 (b) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The President shall no9 tify the Congress when a decision is made to withhold the

10 payment of funds pursuant to subsection (a) and shall no11 tify the Congress when the decision is made to pay any

12 funds previously withheld.

Æ
99.2 Form of Proxy for 2003 Annual Meeting.


                                     PROXY

         THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR
      THE 2003 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF HEARTLAND BANCSHARES, INC.

      I hereby appoint Steve Bechman and Jeffrey L. Goben,  and each of them, my
proxies, with power of substitution and revocation, to vote all Common Shares of
Heartland  Bancshares,  Inc. that I am entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held at Hillview Country Club, 1800 E. King Street, Franklin,
Indiana  46131,  on Monday,  May 5,  2003,  at 6:30 p.m.,  local  time,  and any
adjournments thereof, as provided herein:

1.    ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 ____    FOR all  nominees  listed  below to serve  until the Annual  Meeting of
         Shareholders in the year 2006 as set forth in the Proxy Statement dated
         March  28,  2003   (except  as  marked  to  the   contrary   below--see
         "Instructions"):

                        Sharon Acton

                        Jeff Goben

                        John Norton

____   WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed above

(Instructions:  To  withhold  authority  to vote  for any  nominee,  write  that
nominee's name in the space provided.)

                        (To Be Completed on Reverse Side)



<PAGE>


2.   In their  discretion,  the proxies are  authorized  to vote upon such other
     business as may properly come before the meeting.

     THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS  SPECIFIED.  IN THE ABSENCE OF  SPECIFICATIONS,
     THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ITEM 1.

      SHAREHOLDERS SHOULD MARK, SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY AND RETURN IT
PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED POST-PAID ENVELOPE.  THIS PROXY MAY BE REVOKED AT
ANY TIME PRIOR TO ITS EXERCISE.

DATED: ________________


                                     Signature or Signatures

                                    (Please sign exactly as your name appears on
                                    this proxy. If shares are issued in the name
                                    of two or more  persons,  all  such  persons
                                    should sign. Trustees,  executors and others
                                    signing in a representative  capacity should
                                    indicate the capacity in which they sign.)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31,799]


Pabst Brewing Company, Milwaukee, WI; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On April 29, 1996, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for workers and 
former workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the 
Federal Register on May 16, 1996 (61 FR 24816).
    The findings show that the Milwaukee, Wisconsin, plant experienced 
a decline in employment in January of 1996.
    New findings on reconsideration show that United States imports of 
beer increased both absolutely and as a percentage of U.S. production 
in 1995 compared with 1994 and also increased absolutely and relatively 
in April through March, 1995-1996, compared with the same period one 
year earlier, and that these imports contributed importantly to 
separations at the subject firms.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers at Pabst Brewing 
Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, were adversely affected by increased 
imports of articles like or directly competitive with beer produced at 
the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make 
the following revised determination.

    All workers of Pabst Brewing Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
December 18, 1944, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance 
under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, D.C., this 26th day of June 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-17383 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Lucky Strike Explorations
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael
Noble, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2008                      By: /s/ Michael Noble
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael Noble
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3877 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3877

    To designate the United States Post Office building in Camden, 
  Arkansas, as the ``Honorable David H. Pryor Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 1996

    Mr. Dickey (for himself, Mr. Hutchinson, Mrs. Lincoln, and Mr. 
  Thornton) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate the United States Post Office building in Camden, 
  Arkansas, as the ``Honorable David H. Pryor Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HONORABLE DAVID H. PRYOR POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The United States Post Office building located at 
351 Washington Street in Camden, Arkansas, is designated as the 
``Honorable David H. Pryor Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the United 
States Post Office building referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Honorable David H. Pryor Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Interest of C.R.B. R.S., Natural Father, Appellant, v. David William KIERST, Jr., Respondent, Guardian Ad Litem, Plaintiff.

No. WD 51488.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 14, 1996.

Cecil D. Williams, Kansas City, for appellant.

Donald Lee Cain, Kansas City, for respondent.

Dale Nathan Godfrey, Kansas City, guardian ad litem.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*668
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from termination of parental rights pursuant to § 211.447.2(1), RSMo 1994.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp. III (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Marlene Krauss, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                                       |  |  |  |                    
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Marlene Krauss, M.D.                              |  |  |  | Dated: May 14, 2008
|    |  | Marlene Krauss, M.D.                                  |  |  |  |                    
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  |
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3680

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 31, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to carry out the

international obligations of the United States under the

Geneva Conventions to provide criminal penalties for certain war crimes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3680 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘War Crimes Act of

3 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CERTAIN WAR CRIMES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by inserting after chapter 117 the following:

7 ‘‘CHAPTER 118—WAR CRIMES

‘‘Sec.

‘‘2401. War crimes.

8 ‘‘§ 2401. War crimes

9 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever, whether inside or outside

10 the United States, commits a grave breach of the Geneva

11 Conventions, in any of the circumstances described in sub12 section (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned

13 for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results

14 to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

15 ‘‘(b) CIRCUMSTANCES.—The circumstances referred

16 to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such

17 breach or the victim of such breach is a member of the

18 armed forces of the United States or a national of the

19 United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigra20 tion and Nationality Act).

21 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term

22 ‘grave breach of the Geneva Conventions’ means conduct

23 defined as a grave breach in any of the international con24 ventions relating to the laws of warfare signed at Geneva
3

HR 3680 RDS

1 12 August 1949 or any protocol to any such convention,

2 to which the United States is a party.’’.

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of chapters

4 for part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

5 inserting after the item relating to chapter 117 the follow6 ing new item:

‘‘118. War crimes ................................................................................ 2401’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 29, 1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**PERVASIVE SOFTWARE INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Ramal Acquisition Corp. 

 

Ontario Acquisition Corp. 

 

Pervasive Software International Inc. 

 

Pervasive Software Co., Ltd.—Japan 

 

Pervasive Software GmbH—Germany 

 

Pervasive Software N.V.—Belgium 

 

Pervasive Software Limited—United Kingdom 

 

Pervasive Software S.A.R.L.—France 

 

PVSW Software Technologies India Private Limited—India 

 

Pervasive Software Company—Canada 

 

Data Junction UK Ltd.—United Kingdom