alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7471** 

HOWELL W. WOLTZ, TEP , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sout hern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 5:09

- cv - 00209 )

Submitted : February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge , and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz , a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court ’ s order s accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his 28 U.S.C. A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition , and denying
reconsideration of that order . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cour t. See Woltz v. United

States , No. 5:09

- cv - 00209 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 30 & Oct. 14, 2010). Further, we deny Woltz’s motion for bail pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals.

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number: 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/28/2015 4:49:17 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Availability of Exclusive, Partially Exclusive, or Nonexclusive 
Licenses

AGENCY: U.S. Army Soldier Systems Command.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive, or nonexclusive licenses under the 
following patents. Any licenses granted shall comply with 35 USC 209 
and 37 CFR 404.

    Issued Patent: 5,521,094.
    Title: Method for Establishing Lethality of High Temperature Food 
Processing.
    Issue Date: 5/28/96.

    Issued Patent: 5,517,981.
    Title: Water-Activated Chemical Heater with Suppressed Hydrogen.
    Issue Date: 5/21/96.

    Issued Patent: 5,458,896.
    Title: Technique for Determining the Oxidative Status of Packaged 
Dry or Intermediate Moisture Foods.
    Issue Date: 10/17/95.

    Issued Patent: 5,438,192.
    Title: Photodynamic Protein-Based Photodetector and Photodetector 
System for Image Detection and Processing.
    Issue Date: 08/01/95.

    Issued Patent: 5,402,362.

    Title: Method to Utilize Trail Dyeings to Improve Color 
Formulations.
    Issue Date: 03/28/95.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For further information or a copy of one of the listed patents, please 
contact either Mr. Vincent Ranucci, Patent Counsel at 508-233-4510 or 
Ms. Jessica M. Niro, Paralegal Specialist at 508-233-4513 or by fax at 
508-233-5167 or by writing to the U.S. Army Soldier Systems Command, 
Office of Chief Counsel, ATTN: Patents, Natrick, MA 01760-5035.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 96-17413 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-36995 and 333-70475)
pertaining to the 1997 Director Option Plan, 1997 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and 1997 Stock Plan of Indus International,
Inc. of our report dated January 26, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Indus
International, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
March 26, 1999
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the annual report of CPC of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rod A. Shipman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and








(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: September 7, 2011
/s/ Rod A. ShipmanRod A. ShipmanChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3761 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3761

 To clarify the rules of origin for textile and apparel products from 
                            American Samoa.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 1996

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the rules of origin for textile and apparel products from 
                            American Samoa.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RULES OF ORIGIN FOR TEXTILE AND APPAREL PRODUCTS FROM 
              AMERICAN SAMOA.

    Section 334 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3592) 
shall not affect, for purposes of the customs laws and administration 
of quantitative restrictions, the status of textile and apparel 
products that, under rulings and administrative practices in effect on 
June 30, 1996, would have originated in, or been the growth, product, 
or manufacture of, American Samoa. For such purposes, such rulings and 
administrative practices that were applied on June 30, 1996, to 
determine the origin of textile and apparel products of American Samoa 
shall continue to apply with respect to such products on and after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LAMIA JACOBS
, Appellant,

v.

JOHN THOR N TON and MARGARET THORNTON
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 20

- 985

[ January 7, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Gerald Joseph Curley, Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017

- CA

008154

- XXXX

- MB

.

Yvette Trelles of Trelles & Bichler, LLC, North Palm Beach, and James I. Glasser of Wiggin and Dan a LLP, New Haven, Connecticut, for appellant.

Eric D. Isicoff, Teresa Ragatz and Christopher M. Yannuzzi of Isicoff Ragatz, Miami, and Robert D. Critton, Jr. and J. Chris Bristow of Critton Luttier Coleman, LLP, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, C.J.

, G ROSS and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 376

To provide for return of excess amounts from official allowances of Members

of the House of Representatives to the Treasury for deficit reduction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight and, in addition, to the Committee on Rules, for

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To provide for return of excess amounts from official allowances of Members of the House of Representatives to

the Treasury for deficit reduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RETURN OF EXCESS AMOUNTS FROM OFFICIAL

4 ALLOWANCES OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE

5 OF REPRESENTATIVES TO THE TREASURY

6 FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.

7 Notwithstanding any other law, or any rule or other

8 authority, any amount remaining in an official allowance
2

•HR 376 IH

1 of a Member of the House of Representatives at the end

2 of the session of Congress or other period for which the

3 allowance is made available shall be returned to the Treas4 ury, to be used for deficit reduction.

5 SEC. 2. REPORT OF AMOUNT OF DEFICIT REDUCTION.

6 The Committee on Appropriations of the House of

7 Representatives shall include in its report on the annual

8 appropriations bill for the legislative branch a statement

9 of the total deficit reduction under section 1 for the pre10 ceding calendar year.

11 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

12 As used in this Act—

13 (1) the term ‘‘Member of the House of Rep14 resentatives’’ means a Representative in, or a Dele15 gate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress;

16 and

17 (2) the term ‘‘official allowance’’ means, with

18 respect to a Member of the House of Representa19 tives, the Clerk Hire Allowance, the Official Ex20 penses Allowance, or the Official Mail Allowance.

Æ
EX-10.7.2



 Exhibit 10.7.2 

 
 



 
 April 7, 2014 
 The Board of Directors 
 NW18 HSN Holdings PLC 

(formerly TV18 HSN Holdings Limited) 
 10,
Diomidous Street 
 Alphamega Akropolis Building, 
 3rd Floor, Office 401, 2024 Nicosia 
 Cyprus 

Dear Sirs, 
 We Network18 Media &
Investments Limited (as the majority shareholder of NW18 HSN Holdings PLC (formerly TV18 HSN Holdings Limited)) hereby irrevocably agree that in the event that NW18 HSN Holdings PLC (formerly TV18 HSN Holdings Limited) (‘NW18 HSNC”) fails
to arrange the required finances, shall directly provide to TV18 Home Shopping Network Limited (subsidiary of NW18 HSN), such financial support as is necessary to enable TV18 Home Shopping Network Limited to fulfill all its obligations incurred up
to and including 31 December, 2014, to enable it to continue as a going concern until such time period. 
 In addition, we shall also ensure
that NW18 HSN Holdings PLC (formerly TV18 HSN Holdings Limited) does not undertake any such activities of its own which could prevent it from continuing as a going concern up to and including 31 December, 2014. 

Thanking You, 
 Yours faithfully, 

For Network18 Media & Investments Limited 
  

			
	 /s/ Raghav Bahl 
 Raghav Bahl
 Managing Director
	 	





 Network18 Media & Investments Limited 
 (CIN - L65910DLl996PLC076419) 
 Corp. office: Express Trade Tower, Plot No. 15-16, Sector 16A,
Noida, Uttar Pradesh- 201 301 
 T +91 120 434 1818, F +91 120 432 4110 

Regd. office: 503,504 & 507, 5th Floor, Mercantile House, 15, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,, New Delhi- 110 001 

T +91 11 4981 2600, F +91 11 4150 6115 
 W
www.network18online.com E yug.samrat@network18online.com
**EXHIBIT 32.0**

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersignedexecutive officer of Trans World Corporation (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrants.
| Date: March 15, 2007 | /s/ Rami S. Ramadan                            |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | Name: Rami S. Ramadan                          |   |
|                 | Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, and |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer                        |   |
|                      |                                                |        |  |

 

58

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: UNICO Retail, LLC and Ricardo Valentini v. Edry B & K

- 11, GP, a Texas general partnership

, and Walter E. Salek, individually

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00642

- CV

Trial court case number: 2021

- 33085

Trial court: 55th District Court of Harris County

This case is set for submission with oral argument on September 14, 2022.

In motions for extension of time to file a reply brief filed in May and June 2022, the appel lants informed the Court that the parties have tent atively reached a settle ment and n eeded

additional time to fina lize the agreement.

On August 11, 2022 , counsel for the appellants informed the Clerk that settlement is impending and a formal motion to dis miss the appeal would be filed with the Court at a l ater
time.

The Court requests an update from the parties. The parties are ordered to file an update

as to the statu s of the case or a joint motion to withd raw this appeal from the September 14, 2022

subm ission docket no later than Friday , August 2 6 , 2022

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

______ /s/ Peter Kelly

______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ August 17, 2022

____
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6

PERSONAL

Andrew Carr
President
Amersham Biosciences

20 February 2003

Dear Andrew

I am pleased to confirm that the Remuneration Committee has approved an increase
in your salary to $618,000 per annum with effect from 1 April 2003.
Additionally, in respect of the 2002 Bonus Scheme, the combination of
performance against financial targets and your personal objectives has produced
a bonus of $137,400.

I am also pleased to confirm your award of share options today with a nominal
value of approximately $1,200,000. The performance conditions will be similar to
those adopted last year.

With best wishes.

Yours sincerely

SIR WILLIAM CASTELL
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeuLion, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), eachof the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Nancy Li           |                           |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Name:                  | Nancy Li                       |
| Title:                 | Chief Executive Officer        |
|                   | (Principal Executive  Officer) |
| Date:                  | July 21, 2009             |
|                   |                           |
|                   |                           |
| /s/ Arthur J. McCarthy |                           |
| Name:                  | Arthur J. McCarthy             |
| Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                   | (Principal Financial  Officer) |
| Date:                  | July 21, 2009             |
|                        |                                |  |

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAZ ESPANO MAGALLANES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-72586

Agency No. A200-976-701

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 13, 2014** 

Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Paz Espano Magallanes, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

MAY 20 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010), and review de novo claims of due process violations,

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for

review.

Magallanes alleged past persecution and a fear of future persecution at the

hands of Felix Elivera. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse

credibility determination based on Magallanes’ conviction of a crime involving

fraudulent behavior, see Unuakhaulu v. Gonzales, 416 F.3d 931, 938-39 (9th Cir.

2005) (criminal conviction involving fraud undermined credibility), and based on

Magallanes’ three trips from the Philippines to the United States over 18 years, see

Loho v. Mukasey, 531 F.3d 1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 2008) (voluntary return to country

of alleged persecution undermined credibility). Magallanes’ explanations do not

compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). In

the absence of credible testimony, Magallanes’ withholding of removal claim fails. 

See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Magallanes’ CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same underlying

events that the agency found not credible, and she does not point to any other

2 12-72586
evidence in the record that compels the finding it is more likely than not she would

be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official in the

Philippines. See id. at 1156-57. 

Finally, we reject Magallanes’ contention that the IJ violated her due process

rights by not providing her attorney an opportunity to make an opening statement

or a closing argument, because her attorney never requested it, and she fails to

show how the absence of these arguments prejudiced her case. See Lata, 204 F.3d

at 1246 (requiring error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim). Thus,

Magallanes’ due process claim fails.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-72586
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 08-CR-20601

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

BRIAN OSBURN (D-1),

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR

EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE AND RULE 16 DISCOVERY MATERIALS [DOC. 178]

Defendant moves for pre-trial disclosure of exculpatory evidence discoverable

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and the Jencks Act. 

Oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. Pursuant to E.D.

Mich. Local R. 7.1(e)(2), it is ORDERED that the motions be resolved without oral

argument.

In response to defendant’s motion, the Government has recognized its duty and

willingness to comply with Rule 16, and has stated that it will produce Jencks Act and 

Brady material as required. The court is persuaded that, to date, the Government has

complied with its duties of disclosure under Brady and the Jencks Act. Accordingly,

Defendant's motion for pre-trial disclosure is hereby DENIED as moot. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 1, 2009

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:08-cr-20601-GCS-PJK Doc # 191 Filed 09/01/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 620
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

September 1, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:08-cr-20601-GCS-PJK Doc # 191 Filed 09/01/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 621
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DONALD MAWBY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT REZNICK,

Defendant,

/

Case No. 09-10468 

HON: AVERN COHN

ORDER

Given that defendants Jeffrey Weber, Michael Olcese, and the Law Firm of

Weber & Olcese are no longer parties in this case, plaintiff shall file an amended

complaint as to defendant Robert Reznick. The motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 17)

in so far as it pertains to Robert Reznick is DENIED without prejudice. Following the

filing of the amended complaint and answer, the Court will hold a status conference to

chart the future course of the case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 2, 2009 s/ Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, December 2, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/ Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-10468-AC-MJH Doc # 29 Filed 12/02/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 587