alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,434,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,049,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     96,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,831,874
<PP&E>                                       5,850,404
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,310,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,014,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,247,986
<BONDS>                                      2,391,867
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       181,745
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,411,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,014,080
<SALES>                                     16,703,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,885,949
<CGS>                                       15,698,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,025,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             395,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,465,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                   149,132
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,316,417
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 91,674
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,408,091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .77
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |                       
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|Name                                       |  | State of Incorporation
|Fred Stoker & Sons, Inc.                   |  | Tennessee             
|                                           | 
|International Flavors and Technology, Inc. |  | Delaware              
|                                           | 
|North Atlantic Cigarette Company, Inc.     |  | Delaware              
|                                           | 
|North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc.     |  | Delaware              
|                                           | 
|National Tobacco Company, L.P.             |  | Delaware              
|                                           | 
|National Tobacco Finance Corporation       |  | Delaware              
|                                           | 
|RBJ Sales, Inc.                            |  | Tennessee             
|                                           | 
|Select Tobacco Brands, Inc.                |  | Delaware              
|                                           | 
|Stoker, Inc.                               |  | Tennessee
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3613

To require the Secretary of the Army to acquire permanent flowage and

saturation easements over land that is located within the 10-year floodplain of the James River, South Dakota, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 11, 1996

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Army to acquire permanent

flowage and saturation easements over land that is located within the 10-year floodplain of the James River,

South Dakota, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS OVER LAND

4 NEAR JAMES RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army shall

6 acquire, from willing sellers, permanent flowage and satu7 ration easements over land that is located within the 10-

8 year floodplain of the James River, South Dakota.
2

•HR 3613 IH

1 (b) SCOPE.—

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The easements acquired by

3 the Secretary of the Army under subsection (a) shall

4 include the right, power, and privilege of the Federal

5 Government to submerge, overflow, percolate, and

6 saturate the surface and subsurface of the land and

7 such other terms and conditions as the Secretary of

8 the Army considers appropriate.

9 (2) HAYING AND GRAZING.—The Secretary of

10 the Army shall permit haying and grazing on the

11 land subject to the easements.

12 (c) PAYMENT.—In acquiring the easements under

13 subsection (a), the Secretary of the Army shall pay an

14 amount based on the unaffected fee value of the land sub15 ject to the easements. For the purpose of this subsection,

16 the unaffected fee value of the land is the value that the

17 land would have if the land were unaffected by rising

18 ground water and surface flooding associated with the

19 James River.

20 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

21 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section

22 $40,000,000, to remain available until expended.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



Chief Executive Officers Certification required under

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report of PanAmerican Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael Golden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date: March 30, 2004











|/s/ MICHAELE. GOLDEN                 
|-------------------------------------
|Michael E. Golden                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

TYRONE CAMP, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, 

District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-LHT-8) 

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 29, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Charles Robinson Brewer, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Tyrone Camp appeals the district court’s order denying 

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Camp, No. 4:96-cr-00053-LHT-8 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 9, 2009). We deny 

Camp’s motion for transcripts at government expense and dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

444444444444

NO. 08-0890

444444444444

THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION CO. AND

OFFSHORE SPECIALTY FABRICATORS, INC., PETITIONERS,

v.

WELLINGTON UNDERWRITING AGENCIES, LTD. ET AL., RESPONDENTS

4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

JUSTICE JOHNSON, concurring.

I join parts I and III of the Court’s opinion and its judgment. I write to explain my view of

why the stricken language of paragraph 13 can and should be considered for context.

First, the stricken language of paragraph 13 need not be considered in determining the

policy’s coverage. As explained in part III of the Court’s opinion and by the court of appeals, 267

S.W.3d 277, 283-87, the policy is unambiguous regardless of the presence of the stricken language. 

The policy provides coverage for repairs and vessels engaged in “or about” repairs; it does not

provide coverage for vessels on standby for an extended period of time and not actively preparing

for, supporting, or engaged in repairs.

Next, this was not a one-size-fits-all insurance agreement. The insurance contract was

negotiated based on Offshore’s particular risks. The striking of paragraph 13 and other language
from the form policy is an objective reflection of the setting surrounding the creation of the policy;

it assists in giving context to how the policy terms were reached through negotiations. See ___

S.W.3d ___ at ___ (Jefferson, C.J., dissenting) (citing 11 RICHARD A. LORD, WILLISTON ON

CONTRACTS § 32.7 (4th ed. 1999)). The strikings show that the parties negotiating the contract were

experienced with the type of coverage being negotiated and that “standby charges” was a term of

art reflecting a particular, recognized category of risk. Moreover, the presence of the clause

providing a deductible for standby charges does not indicate that the policy covers standby charges

as the dissent posits. To the contrary, it indicates the opposite: standby charges were a separate,

recognized category of expense. The insuring portions of the policy did not provide coverage for

such charges even though the deductible clause was not stricken.

________________________________________

Phil Johnson

Justice

OPINION DELIVERED: August 26, 2011

2
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RM Health International, Inc.                for the                quarter ended February 28, 2007 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended February 28, 2007, fairly presents in all material                respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of RM Health                International, Inc.. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Randy Weston                                                              |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Randy                Weston                                                                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  April                17, 2007                                                                      |
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Accredited Members Holding Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Lavigne Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
May 16, 2011By:
/s/ David Lavigne

David Lavigne

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)
II

Calendar No. 578

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H.R. 3579

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain

property containing a fish and wildlife facility to the

State of Wyoming, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3579 PCS

1 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO WYO2 MING.

3 (a) CONVEYANCE.—Not later than 180 days after the

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

5 shall convey to the State of Wyoming without reimburse6 ment, all right, title, and interest of the United States in

7 and to the property described in subsection (b).

8 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The property re9 ferred to in subsection (a) is the property commonly

10 known as ‘‘Ranch A’’ in Crook County, Wyoming, consist11 ing of approximately 680 acres of land including all real

12 property, buildings, and all other improvements to real

13 property, and all personal property including art, historic

14 light fixtures, wildlife mounts, draperies, rugs, and fur15 niture directly related to the site, including personal prop16 erty on loan to museums and other entities, at the time

17 of transfer.

18 (c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—

19 (1) USE.—The property conveyed to the State

20 of Wyoming under this section shall be retained in

21 public ownership and be used by the State for the

22 purposes of—

23 (A) fish and wildlife management and edu24 cation; and

25 (B) using, maintaining, displaying, and re26 storing, through State or local agreements, or
3

HR 3579 PCS

1 both, the museum quality real and personal

2 property and the historical interests and signifi3 cance of the real and personal property, consist4 ent with applicable Federal and State laws.

5 (2) ACCESS BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDU6 CATION.—The State of Wyoming shall provide ac7 cess to the property for institutions of higher edu8 cation at a compensation level that is agreed to by

9 the State and the institution of higher education.

10 (3) REVERSION.—If the property described in

11 subsection (b) is not used for a purpose consistent

12 with paragraphs (1) and (2), all right, title, and in13 terest in and to the property shall revert to the

14 United States. The State of Wyoming shall ensure

15 that all property that reverts to the United States

16 under this subsection is in substantially the same or

17 better condition as at the time of conveyance to the

18 State.

Passed the House of Representatives September 4,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Calendar No. 578

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3579

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey

purposes.cility to the State of Wyoming, and for othercertain property containing a fish and wildlife faSEPTEMBER 5, 1996

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1731** 

EMMA KATHY LOVE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN , Defendant

- A ppellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:07

- cv - 00648

- JAB

- LPA )

Submitted : January 29, 2015 Decided: April 3, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Jason L. Wilson, FOLEY & WILSON PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Lisa G. Smoller, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpubli shed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Emma Kathy Love appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Love’s application for disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Love v. Colvin , No. 1:07

- cv - 00648

- JAB

- LPA (M.D.N.C. May 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present ed in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al Doc. 10

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLARD L. SLOAN, EUGENE J.

WINNINGHAM, JAMES L. KELLEY,

on behalf of themselves and a similarly Case No. 09-cv-10918

situated class,

Paul D. Borman

Plaintiffs, United States District Judge

v.

Mona K. Majzoub

United States Magistrate Judge

BORGWARNER, INC., BORGWARNER

FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLANS and

BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED 

TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER REGARDING AUGUST 22, 2013 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

AND THE ISSUE OF RULING ON VESTING

It is clear to the Court now, after speaking with the parties on August 22, 2013 in a Courtinitiated conference call, and having now read Mr. Burchfield’s November 29, 2012 letter, that

BorgWarner is not in agreement with the Court’s holding the vesting issue in abeyance unless the

Court is prepared to decide the comparability issue in BorgWarner’s favor – and on the present

record. Since Plaintiffs contend that additional discovery is necessary to tee up the comparability

issue, BorgWarner asks to have its motion for summary judgment on the vesting issue decided now.

Accordingly, the Court finds that BorgWarner, who in good faith filed a motion seeking

summary judgment on the issue of vesting, and who timely objected to holding the vesting issue in

abeyance if it would necessitate additional discovery or hearings on the comparability issue, is

entitled to a decision now from the Court on the issue of vesting. 

1

2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 123 Filed 08/23/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 7314
In view of the time that has passed since the issue of vesting was originally briefed, the Court

invites the parties each to file a supplemental brief, up to 15 pages length, supplementing, updating

or otherwise supporting their original briefs on the issue of vesting only. The supplemental briefs

should be filed on or before September 16, 2013. The Court will then address the vesting issue

expeditiously.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

Paul D. Borman

United States District Judge

Dated: August 23, 2013

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party

of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 23, 2013.

s/Deborah Tofil 

Case Manager

2

2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 123 Filed 08/23/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 7315
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

KEVIN J. MURRAY,

Plaintiff,

Civil No. 08-15147

v. Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER and

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM,

Defendants.

________________________________________________/

JUDGMENT

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to this Court’s opinion and order dated

January 14, 2011, Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated at Port Huron, Michigan, this 14th day of January, 2011.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: S/Marie E. Verlinde 

Marie E. Verlinde 

Case Manager

APPROVED:

s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM Document 93 Filed 01/14/11 Page 1 of 1
#### Marsha and Christy HEDGLIN, Appellants, v. STAHL SPECIALTY COMPANY, Respondent.

No. WD 52097.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 25, 1996.

Joan Klosterman, Kansas City, for appellants.

Terry J. Brady, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Dependents of deceased employee were denied the additional fifteen percent of benefits for an alleged violation of § 287.120.4 by the employer. Judgment of denial of additional benefits affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Rhe-Tech, Inc., Case No.: 2:08-CV-14104-PJD-SDP

a Michigan Corporation,

Hon. Partick J. Duggan

Plaintiff,

Magistrate Judge Steven D. Pepe

-vOwens Corning, 

a Delaware Corporation,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

Gary K. August (P48730) Thomas P. Dillon (P55191)

Matthew G. McNaughton (P66097) Nathan A. Hall (P67074)

ZAUSMER, KAUFMAN, AUGUST, Stefanie E. Deller (P61573)

CALDWELL & TAYLER, P.C. SHUMAKER, LOOP & 

Attorneys for Plaintiff KENDRICK, LLP

31700 Middlebelt Road, Ste. 150 Attorney for Defendant 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 North Courthouse Square

Telephone: (248) 851-4111 1000 Jackson Street 

Fax: (248) 851-0100 Toledo, OH 43624

Telephone: (419) 241-9000

Fax: (419) 241-6894

____________________________________/

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

At a session of said Court

held in the City of Detroit, County of Wayne,

State of Michigan on August 7, 2009.

PRESENT: HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 United States District Court Judge

This matter having come before the Court by stipulation of the parties due to the amicable

resolution of this case and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Rhe-Tech, Inc.’s claims against Owens Corning are

dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this is a final Order which resolves all claims by all parties

2:08-cv-14104-PJD-SDP Doc # 26 Filed 08/07/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 343
2

and closes this case.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: August 7, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August

7, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

STIPULATION

We stipulate to the entry of the foregoing Order of Dismissal:

 s/Gary K. August s/Thomas P. Dillon 

Gary K. August (P48730) Thomas P. Dillon (P55191)

Matthew G. McNaughton (P66097) Nathan A. Hall (P67074)

ZAUSMER, KAUFMAN, AUGUST, Stefanie E. Deller (P61573)

CALDWELL & TAYLER, P.C. SHUMAKER, LOOP & 

Attorneys for Plaintiff KENDRICK, LLP

31700 Middlebelt Road, Ste. 150 Attorney for Defendant 

Farmington Hills, MI 48334 North Courthouse Square

Telephone: (248) 851-4111 1000 Jackson Street 

Fax: (248) 851-0100 Toledo, OH 43624

gaugust@zkact.com Telephone: (419) 241-9000

Fax: (419) 241-6894

Tdillon@slk-law.com

2:08-cv-14104-PJD-SDP Doc # 26 Filed 08/07/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 344