alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3676 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3676

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the intent of 
      Congress with respect to the Federal carjacking prohibition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Carjacking Correction Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF INTENT OF CONGRESS IN FEDERAL CARJACKING 
              PROHIBITION.

    Section 2119(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, including any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in 
the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, 
would violate section 2241 or 2242 of this title'' after (as defined in 
section 1365 of this title''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<Page>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.8.2

                                    ADDENDUM
                                       TO
                    EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

         ADDENDUM, dated as of December 31, 2001, to Executive Management
Severance Agreement dated August 11, 1999, between John F. McCabe, (the
"Executive") residing at 10700 Schindel Court, Great Falls, Virginia 22066, and
Condor Technology Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),
with offices at 351 W. Camden Street, 8th Floor, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 (the
"Agreement").

WHEREAS, the Agreement provides for certain compensation and benefits to the
Executive following a change of control of the Corporation; and

WHEREAS, there will be a change of control of the Corporation upon the issuance
of shares representing fifty five percent of all shares of the Corporation's
common stock outstanding to a trust established by the Corporation's lender
group, led by First Union National Bank, or to members of the lender group; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to reduce the cost of internal legal services
in order to meet budget objectives in calendar year 2002; now therefore it is
AGREED that

     1.  The Executive shall be on unpaid leave one (1) day per calendar week,
         commencing the week of December 31, 2001, and the Executive shall
         receive no cash bonus in respect of services rendered during calendar
         year 2001, constituting a reduction in compensation.

     2.  The parties to the Agreement acknowledge that the severance benefits
         provided to the Executive upon termination of employment could decrease
         over time after a change of control of the Corporation in accordance
         with the schedule provided in Exhibit A to the Agreement.

     3.  A delay in the exercise of any rights under the Agreement by the
         Executive shall not constitute a waiver of such rights and shall not
         limit such rights.

     4.  Except as set forth above, the Agreement shall remain in full force
         and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum to the
Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

CONDOR TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

/s/ J. L. Huitt                                         /s/ John F. McCabe
-------------------------------------                 --------------------------
J. L. Huitt, Jr., President and                         John F. McCabe
Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 12
 CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (An Indirect Wholly Owned Subsidiary of CenterPoint Energy, Inc.)
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(millions of dollars)
 Year Ended December 31,2003
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2007(1)Net income
    
    $
    129
    
    
    $
    144
    
    
    $
    193
    
    
    $
    207
    
    
    $
    287Income taxes
    
    
    59
    
    
    
    87
    
    
    
    116
    
    
    
    116
    
    
    
    173Capitalized interest
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (2
    )
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (6
    )
    
    
    (12
    )187
    
    
    
    229
    
    
    
    308
    
    
    
    317
    
    
    
    448Fixed charges, as defined:Interest expense
    
    
    179
    
    
    
    178
    
    
    
    176
    
    
    
    167
    
    
    
    187Capitalized interest
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    12Interest component of rentals
charged to operating expense
    
    
    9
    
    
    
    10
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    14Total fixed charges
    
    
    189
    
    
    
    190
    
    
    
    188
    
    
    
    190
    
    
    
    213Earnings, as defined
    
    $
    376
    
    
    $
    419
    
    
    $
    496
    
    
    $
    507
    
    
    $
    661Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.99
    
    
    
    2.20
    
    
    
    2.64
    
    
    
    2.67
    
    
    
    3.10
 
 (1)
    
    Excluded from the computation of fixed charges is interest income of $2 million in 2007,
which is included in income tax expense.
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.13 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.14 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.15 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.16 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.17 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.18 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.19 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.20 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.21 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.22 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.23 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.24 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.25 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.26 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.27 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.28 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.29 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.30 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.31 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:09-cr-20041-AJT-MKM ECF No. 3 filed 03/12/09 PageID.32 Page 20 of 20
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 17, 2021

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No s

. 3D20

- 1235 & 3D20

- 1236 Lower Tribunal No s

. 18

- 23904 & 18

- 23897

________________


### Jack Stone , Appellant,

vs. 

### Elizabeth Helen Germann and Peter Edward Germann , Appellee s

.

Appeal s under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Michaelle Gonzalez

- Paulson , Judge. Jack Stone, in proper person

. Elizabeth Helen Germann and Peter Edward Germann , in proper person s

. Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and MILLER , JJ.
PER CURIAM.2 Upon consideration of the initial brief, and finding no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated, the order below is summarily affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a)

. Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 04, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 04, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0020. NAVARRO A. LANE v. RENALDO PARKES.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

23A00228
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Southern States Power Company, Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Harrison A. McCoy III, Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company, certify to the
best  of  my  knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec.  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:
          (1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and
          (2)     The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in
all  material  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Harrison A. McCoy III
___________________________
Chief  Financial  Officer
August  12,  2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

NO. 2:09-CR-20116

Plaintiff,

HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH

v. United States District Judge

BOB D.J. KRANICK,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADJOURNING

SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION HEARING

For the reasons set forth in the parties’ stipulation to adjourn the supervised release

violation hearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the hearing on defendant’ supervised release violation

scheduled on January 5, 2011 is adjourned to January 25, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.

Dated: January 6, 2011 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

Flint, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 6, 2011.

s/Deborah J. Goltz 

DEBORAH J. GOLTZ

Case Manager

4:09-cr-20116-MAG Doc # 15 Filed 01/06/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 42
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery
E. Jones,  Secretary/Treasurer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: July 24, 2009



                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                Secretary/Treasurer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00310-CR

NO. 03-06-00311-CR

Phillip Ashcraft, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. CR-04-252 & CR-04-253, HONORABLE WILLIAM R. HENRY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s brief was due January 29, 2007. The brief has not been received and

appellant’s retained attorney, Thomas Anthony Zakes, did not respond to this Court’s notice that

the brief is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent,

whether retained counsel has abandoned this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court

shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint

substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing,

including copies of all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be
2

forwarded to the clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than June 22, 2007.

See Rule 38.8(b)(3).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Abated

Filed: May 24, 2007

Do Not Publish
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTEMES, SA, 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Claim Defendant, 

 Case No. 09-cv-10534 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

KEITH CHILDRESS, 

 Defendant/Counter-Claim Plaintiff. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 

IN LIMINE NO. 11 (ECF No. 647) 

On March 4, 2024, Plaintiff Dassault Systemes, SA filed a Motion in limine

to preclude Defendant Keith Childress “from arguing at trial that the ‘ulterior 

purpose’ element of his abuse of process counterclaim is satisfied by anything other 

than his ‘EPP-coercion’ theory.” (Mot., ECF No. 647, PageID.24689.) For the 

reasons explained on the record, the motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 21, 2024 

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 660, PageID.24956 Filed 03/21/24 Page 1 of 2
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on March 21, 2024, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 660, PageID.24957 Filed 03/21/24 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Jeffery Thompson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Solutions Mechanical, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: May 15, 2008  /s/ Jeffery Thompson Jeffery Thompson Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

NAZARETH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE
DEPARTMENT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 313 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

Weibo Corporation 
  

									
	NAME AND ADDRESS	 	        CERTIFICATE NUMBER          	 	    DISTINCTIVE NUMBERS      	 	    PAR VALUE PER SHARE  
	OF SHAREHOLDER	 	 	 	FROM  	 	TO    	 	  
	  	 	 	 	     	 	  	 	  
	  	 	DATE OF ISSUE	 	NO. OF SHARES    	 	CONSIDERATION PAID
	  	 	  	 	     	 	  


SHARE CERTIFICATE 
 OF

 Weibo Corporation 

INCORPORATED IN THE CAYMAN ISLANDS 
 THIS IS TO
CERTIFY THAT THE UNDERMENTIONED PERSON IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF THE SHARES SPECIFIED HEREUNDER SUBJECT TO THE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY 
  

											
	SHAREHOLDER	 	 NO. OF  

    SHARES      
	 	    DISTINCTIVE NUMBERS    	 	        CERTIFICATE        	 	            DATE OF       
     
	 	 	 	NUMBER	 	ISSUE
	 	 	    FROM      	 	        TO            	 	 	 	  
	  	 	  	 	     	 	  	 	  	 	  

  

	
	SIGNED BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY


	
	
	  

	DIRECTOR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARIO CLARKE,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

09-CV-11246

vs.

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

RANDY UMBARGER, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer has submitted a Report and Recommendation

(“R&R”) in which he recommends that the court grant defendants’ motion to dismiss or for

summary judgment. No objections to this R&R have been filed and the deadline for doing so has

expired. The court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes all of

the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Sheer’s R&R is accepted and adopted as the

findings and conclusions of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary

judgment [docket entry 22] is granted.

s/Bernard A. Friedman

Dated: September 15, 2009 BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

Detroit, Michigan UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:09-cv-11246-BAF-DAS Doc # 28 Filed 09/15/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 243
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NORMAN DORISE,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-10042

Hon. Marianne O. Battani

v.

 Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk

ELLA BULLEA CUMMINGS, 

et al., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff, Norman Dorise, an inmate housed at the Chippewa Correctional Facility,

filed a complaint alleging various employees of the City of Detroit violated his constitutional

rights. The Court subsequently referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Michael

Hluchaniuk for all pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On May 11, 2010, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff’s

Motion to Dismiss several defendants, including James Fitz, Maurice Getteno, John Mozak,

Sheldon Lloyd, Dale Collins, Jo Miller, Melvin Chaney, Michael Jordan, and Ella Cummings

from this lawsuit. See Doc. No. 87. Each of these Defendants has filed a motion to

dismiss, which the Magistrate Judge recommended be denied as moot. See Doc. Nos. 77,

78, 83. 

The Magistrate Judge informed the parties that objections to the R&R must be filed

within ten days of service and that a party’s failure to file objections would waive any further

right of appeal. See R&R at 2; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2).
2

Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to

review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation,

GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41, and DENIES as moot

Defendants’ motions to dismiss. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DATED: June 4, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were mailed to Plaintiff and counsel of record on this date by

ordinary mail and electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt 

Case Manager
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA Cherry

Douglas , J.

2 burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having considered the parties' arguments and the documentation before this court, we conclude that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is not warranted. See Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Petitioner has an adequate legal remedy by which to challenge the drug-testing portion of her case plan in the form of a motion to revoke or modify the case plan under NRS 432B.570(1). SeeNRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. NRS 432B.570(2) mandates that the district court hold a hearing on such a motion. Although petitioner orally objected to the drug-testing portion of her case plan below, the district court did not enter any written factual findings on the issue, and we cannot determine, based on the limited record before us, whether the drug-testing portion of the case plan was a manifest abuse of discretion or in excess of the district court's authority. See generally In re Sergio C., 83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 51, 53 (Ct. App. 1999) (discussing whether there is sufficient evidence to allow a district court to require a parent to undergo drug testing as part of a case plan to reunify with his or her children). Thus, petitioner has not met her burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted at this time. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

(0) 1947A 4igt(3)cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division Special Public Defender Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3
(0) 1947A »01WItr