alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| ROSS MILLERSecretary of State204 North Carson Street, Ste 1Carson City, Nevada  88701-4299(775) 684 5706Website: secretaryofstate.biz | Filed in the office of/s/ Ross MillerRoss MillerSecretary of StateState of Nevada | Document Number20070769802-41Filing Date and Time11/08/2007 3:46 PMEntity NumberE0356552006-4 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Certificate of Change Pursuant to NRS 78.209 |
|----------------------------------------------|

**Certificate of Change filed Pursuant to NRS 78.209**

**For Nevada Profit Corporations**

1.  Name of corporation:

Smartech Holdings Inc.

2.  The board of directors have adopted a resolution pursuant to NRS 78.207 and have obtained any required approval of the stockholders.

3.  The current number of authorized shares and the par value, if any, of each class or series, if any, of shares before the change:

75,000,000 shares with a par value $0.001

4.  The number of authorized shares and the par value, if any, of each class or series, if any, of shares after the change:

1,500,000,000 shares with a par value $0.001.

5.  The number of shares of each affected class or series, if any, to be issued after the change in exchange for each issued share of the same class or series:

The Corporation shall issue twenty (20) shares of common stock for every one (1) share of the common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the forward stock split.

6.  The provisions, if any, for the issuance of fractional shares, or for the payment of money or the issuance of scrip to stockholders otherwise entitled to a fraction of a share and the percentage of outstanding shares affected thereby:

No fractional shares shall be issued

7.  Effective date of filing (optional):  11/14/07
| 8.  Officer Signature: | /s/ Yapp Moi LeeSignature | President and DirectorTitle |
|------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------|

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

 

 

CW1317962.1
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**Section 906 CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of EchoStar DBS Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.      Dated: March 5, 2008             Name: /s/ *Charles W. Ergen*             Title: Chairman of the Board of Directors and                Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

DAVID AARON TENENBAUM, et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

DEFENSE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-CV-10612

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT FIRST MOTION TO DISMISS AND SETTING BRIEFING

AND HEARING DATE ON SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS 

On June 3, 2009, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss, which the court set for

hearing on July 15, 2009. Thereafter, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint as a matter

of course, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), and Defendants filed a second motion to dismiss,

directed at the amended complaint. On June 30, 2009, the court conducted a telephone

conference with the parties who confirmed that, in light of the subsequent amendment,

the earlier-filed motion to dismiss is now moot. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ June 3, 2009 motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 15] is

DENIED AS MOOT. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will conduct a hearing on Defendants’

June 22, 2009 motion to dismiss [Dkt. # 20] on July 15, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. Defendants’

optional reply brief is due by July 6, 2009. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 6, 2009

2:09-cv-10612-RHC-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 07/06/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 863
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record 

on this date, July 6, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa G. Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-10612.TENENBAUM.Schedule.wpd

2:09-cv-10612-RHC-RSW Doc # 23 Filed 07/06/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 864
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John W. Combs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.

Date: February 5, 2010



By:

/s/ John W. CombsName:

John W. CombsTitle:

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies this Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenced into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made on or before or after the date of this Report), irrespective at any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,148
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,401
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,038
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,073
<LOANS>                                         26,771
<ALLOWANCE>                                        368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,688
<DEPOSITS>                                      28,994
<SHORT-TERM>                                        20
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                351
<LONG-TERM>                                        673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           713
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  38,688
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,945
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  474
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   122
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,541
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,198
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,257
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,284
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      231
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    343
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         343
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.97
<LOANS-NON>                                        462
<LOANS-PAST>                                       259
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   195
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       58
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  368
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               318
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             50
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.3 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer.


                                  Certification



I, Steven L. Bechman, the Chief Executive Officer of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.,
certify  that (i) the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual  period ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the  information  contained in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual  period ended  December 31, 2002
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of Heartland Bancshares, Inc.




                                          __/s/ Steven L. Bechman_________



                                          _Steven L. Bechman______________



                                          _March 28, 2003  _______________
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United
States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), Jane A.
Freeman, the Chief Financial Officer of Scientific Learning Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of her knowledge: 1.
The
  Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007,
  to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
  Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
The
  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March
7, 2008 /s/ Jane A.
  FreemanJane A.
  Freeman 
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer This certification accompanies
and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall
not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Periodic Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit
      23.1**













**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        (Form
        S-3 Nos. 333-98775 and 333-132227 and Form S-8 Nos. 333-99597, 333-103368
        and
        333-118347) of Equity One, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our reports
        dated February 26, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
        and schedules of Equity One, Inc., Equity One, Inc. management’s assessment of
        the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
        effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Equity One,
        Inc.,
        included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
        2006.







/s/
      ERNST
& YOUNG LLP


Certified
      Public Accountants





Miami,
      Florida


February
      26, 2007
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2014

No. 04-14-00829-CV

WESTERN RIM PROPERTY SERVICES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Paula BAZAN-GARCIA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CV01064

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Appellant’s emergency motion for stay is granted. We order all proceedings in Cause No. 

2014CV01064, styled Paula Bazan-Garcia v. Western Rim Property Services, Inc., pending in 

the County Court at Law No. 3 of Bexar County, Texas, stayed until further order of this court. 

Entered on this 3rd day of December, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Attested to: _____________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CRISHONE CRYSTAL JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CR-96-30022)

Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 21, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crishone Crystal Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1Insofar as Johnson is appealing the February 14, 2005, order

denying her motion to expedite review of a successive 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, this court does not have jurisdiction because

the May 25, 2005, notice of appeal is untimely as to that order. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). 

2

To the extent Johnson may be seeking authorization to file a

second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2244 (2000), citing Booker and Blakely, we deny

authorization because the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule

of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral

review with respect to either case.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

By notice of appeal dated May 25, 2005, Crishone Crystal

Johnson seeks to appeal her sentence ordered in a March 4, 1999,

criminal judgment, citing United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. ____,

125 S. Ct. 738 (2005) and Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296

(2004). In criminal cases, the defendant must file her notice of

appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P.

4(b)(1)(A). The time periods established by Rule 4 are “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978). Insofar as Johnson appeals the March 4, 1999,

criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.1 2

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-2 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-2 Filed 02/11/19 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-2 Filed 02/11/19 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-2 Filed 02/11/19 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                      CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.
       (AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)


               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       1998            1999            2000           2001             2002
                                                     --------        --------        --------        --------        --------

<S>                                                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Income from continuing operations................    $ 93,824        $103,871        $ 98,228        $ 67,244        $120,060
Income taxes for continuing operations...........     111,830          88,781          93,272          58,287          87,643
                                                     --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
                                                      205,654         192,652         191,500         125,531         207,703
                                                     --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
Fixed charges, as defined:
   Interest expense..............................     111,337         119,500         142,861         154,965         153,688
   Distribution on trust preferred securities....         632             357              29              28              25
   Interest component of rentals charged to
   operating expense.............................       8,485          10,975          10,934          10,369           8,651
                                                     --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
   Total fixed charges...........................     120,454         130,832         153,824         165,362         162,364
                                                     --------        --------        --------        --------        --------
Earnings, as defined.............................    $326,108        $323,484        $345,324        $290,893        $370,067
                                                     ========        ========        ========        ========        ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges...............        2.71            2.47            2.24            1.76            2.28
                                                     ========        ========        ========        ========        ========
</TABLE>
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### December 15, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT
MATTHEW RUCKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE VATICAN BANK; THE WORLD BANK; THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND; THE FEDERAL RESERVE; THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL CORPORATION; THE STATE OF KANSAS CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. No. 15-3171 (D.C. No. 5:15-CV-03143-SAC-DJW) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before GORSUCH , O’BRIEN , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges. Matthew Rucker, a prisoner housed at the Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, seeks leave from this court to proceed in forma pauperis and to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as legally frivolous. We do

* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.not see how we can. Even if we were to grant his motion and reach the merits of his appeal, Mr. Rucker has failed to identify any reasoned basis for reversing the district court’s order. The district court’s order is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed. We further note that the district court’s dismissal is Mr. Rucker’s third strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), restricting any future actions brought under that section. Mr. Rucker’s in forma pauperismotion is denied. He is reminded that he is obliged to pay the filing fee in full.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
PER CURIAM

- 2 -
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00147-CR

DAVION LATRONE YOUNG, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 6th District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26371

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Davion Latrone Young attempts to appeal his conviction of sexual assault of a child.1 This 

Court is without jurisdiction to consider Young’s appeal because he had no right of appeal due to 

his plea agreement with the State. Moreover, Young waived any right of appeal he might have 

otherwise had and has not obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. 

The trial court’s certification of right of appeal filed in this matter shows that this was a 

plea bargain case in which Young had no right of appeal. The Texas Legislature has granted a 

very limited right of appeal in plea bargain cases. Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure details that right as follows:

(2) . . . . In a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s 

plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a 

defendant may appeal only:

(A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and 

ruled on before trial, or

(B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The appellate record filed in this matter contains no written motions 

filed by Young and ruled on before trial. Further, there is no indication in the record that Young 

obtained the trial court’s permission to appeal. To the contrary, the trial court’s certification 

indicates that Young has no right of appeal. Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, this Court is required to dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s 

certification indicates no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

 

1See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011 (West 2011).
3

On August 9, 2016, we informed Young of the apparent defect in our jurisdiction over his 

appeal and afforded him the opportunity to respond and, if possible, to cure such defect. Young 

did not respond to our letter.

Because Young’s plea agreement prevents an appeal and because the trial court’s 

certification correctly indicates that Young is without a right of appeal, we dismiss this appeal for 

want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: August 25, 2016

Date Decided: August 26, 2016

Do Not Publish