alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a) CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE  WITH SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Mark W. Smith, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spherion Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: March 10, 2004                                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/MARK W. SMITHMark W. Smith
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

75

---

QuickLinks
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William POSLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 63142, 65560.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Dec. 6, 1994.

Craig A. Johnston, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, William Posley, appeals from his judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree; burglary in the second degree; stealing a credit card; and misdemeanor stealing. He was sentenced as a class X offender to three concurrent 20 year sentences and a concurrent one year sentence on the misdemeanor conviction. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed defendant’s direct appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

*819The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the “Form 10-QSB”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of Manhattan Bancorp (the “Company”).

I, Dean Fletcher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

2.     The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such reports.
|        | Dated: August 13, 2007       |   |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ Dean Fletcher            |   |   | . |
|   | Dean Fletcher                |   |   |
|   | Executive Vice President and |   |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer      |   |   |
|        |                              |        |        |  |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.34

                [NORTH ATLANTIC TRADING COMPANY, INC. LETTERHEAD]



THOMAS F. HELMS, JR.
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer


VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS


September 24, 1999

Mr. Jack Africk
North Atlantic Trading Company, Inc.
1200 North Federal Highway, Suite 211
Boca Raton, Florida 33431

Re:  Consultant Agreement

Dear Jack:

Pursuant to the notification terms of your existing Consultant Agreement, we are
pleased to inform you that North Atlantic Trading Company wishes to renew its
arrangement with you for fiscal year 2000, which will run from January 1, 200 to
December 31, 2000. The terms and conditions of that arrangement would be
maintained as currently stated in the current Consultant Agreement, dated as of
December 11, 1998.

As you recall, the additional compensation for reimbursement of secretarial
services, office rent and car expense were provided in a separate agreement and
was o expire on June 30, 1999 but, at your request, was extended until December
31, 1999. Given the circumstances associated with those one-time decisions, this
additional compensation will not be offered beyond December 31, 1999.

Once again, we would be very pleased to have you continue as a Consultant to the
Company for fiscal year 2000, we believe you provide real and significant value
to the Company. If the above is acceptable to you, please indicate your
agreement by signing below and return the executed document.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Thomas F. Helms, Jr.

Agreed & Accepted this 27th day of September, 1999


/s/ Jack Africk
------------------------------------------
Jack Africk



NY2:\893994\01\J5T601!.DOC\64980.0003
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3693

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a capital loss deduction

with respect to the sale or exchange of a principal residence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 1996

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself, Mr. GILMAN, and Mr. SHAYS) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

capital loss deduction with respect to the sale or exchange of a principal residence.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CAPITAL LOSS DEDUCTION ALLOWED WITH RE4 SPECT TO SALE OR EXCHANGE OF PRINCIPAL

5 RESIDENCE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 165 (re7 lating to limitation on losses of individuals) is amended

8 by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph (2), by striking

9 the period at the end of paragraph (3) and inserting ‘‘;
2

•HR 3693 IH

1 and’’, and by adding at the end the following new para2 graph:

3 ‘‘(4) losses arising from the sale or exchange of

4 the principal residence (within the meaning of sec5 tion 1034) of the taxpayer.’’

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

7 subsection (a) shall apply to sales and exchanges after the

8 date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years ending

9 after such date.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

          - [CA–169–1220–AL]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal of the Carrizo Plain National Monument Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92–463). Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior has renewed the Bureau of Land Management's Carrizo Plain National Monument Advisory Committee.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary with respect to the preparation and implementation of the Carrizo Plain National Monument Management Plan.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Herrema, National Landscape Conservation System and Community Partnerships (WO–170), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street, NW., Room 5618, Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202) 208–3516.

## Certification Statement

I hereby certify that the renewal of the Carrizo Plain National Monument Advisory Committee is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the Secretary of the Interior's responsibilities to manage the lands, resources, and facilities administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

Dated: July 14, 2008.

Dirk Kempthorne,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. E8–17473 Filed 7–30–08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–40–M
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS*



I, Alfredo M. Barreiro, certify that:



1)

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PanAmerican Bancorp;



2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4)

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5)

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.







Date: March 30, 2004





|/s/ ALFREDOM. BARREIRO       
|-----------------------------
|Vice President and Controller
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3632

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal

the requirement for annual resident review for nursing

facilities under the Medicaid program and to require

resident reviews for mentally ill or mentally retarded

residents when there is a significant change in physical

or mental condition.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3632 RDS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL RESI2 DENT REVIEW FOR MENTALLY ILL AND MEN3 TALLY RETARDED NURSING FACILITY RESI4 DENTS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1919(e)(7) of the Social

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(e)(7)) is amended—

7 (1) in subparagraph (B)—

8 (A) by striking ‘‘ANNUAL’’ in the heading,

9 and

10 (B) by striking clause (iii); and

11 (2) in subparagraph (D)(i), by striking ‘‘AN12 NUAL’’ in the heading.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact15 ment of this Act.

16 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW IN CASE OF SIGNIFI17 CANT CHANGE IN PHYSICAL OR MENTAL

18 CONDITION OF MENTALLY ILL OR MENTALLY

19 RETARDED NURSING FACILITY RESIDENTS.

20 (a) REQUIREMENT FOR NOTIFICATION OF STATE

21 AUTHORITY.—Section 1919(b)(3)(E) of the Social Secu22 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(b)(3)(E)) is amended by adding

23 at the end the following: ‘‘In addition, a nursing facility

24 shall notify the State mental health authority or State

25 mental retardation or developmental disability authority,

26 as applicable, promptly after a significant change in the
3

HR 3632 RDS

1 physical or mental condition of a resident who is mentally

2 ill or mentally retarded.’’.

3 (b) REQUIREMENT FOR REVIEW.—Section

4 1919(e)(7)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(e)(7)(B)), as

5 amended by section 1(a)(1), is amended by inserting after

6 clause (ii) the following new clause:

7 ‘‘(iii) REVIEW REQUIRED UPON

8 CHANGE IN RESIDENT’S CONDITION.—A

9 review and determination under clause (i)

10 or (ii) must be conducted promptly after a

11 nursing facility has notified the State men12 tal health authority or State mental retar13 dation or developmental disability author14 ity, as applicable, under subsection

15 (b)(3)(E) with respect to a mentally ill or

16 mentally retarded resident, that there has

17 been a significant change in the resident’s

18 physical or mental condition.’’.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to changes in physical or mental

21 condition occurring on or after the date of the enactment

22 of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives September 28,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KANTO CAMAJ, et al.,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 09-11259

v. HON. VICTORIA A ROBERTS

 U.S. District Judge

HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al.,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF RECUSAL AND REASSIGNMENT

The undersigned has been assigned as the Magistrate Judge in this action. Upon

review of the record I have found cause to recuse myself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455(a), and

therefore the Clerk is hereby directed to reassign this matter by blind draw to another

magistrate judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/R.STEVEN WHALEN 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Pursuant to this order this case is reassigned from Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen to

Magistrate Judge___Michael Hluchaniuk_________.

Date: May 20, 2009 __s/ Sarah Schoenherr______

Deputy Clerk 

Copies Served on:

Counsel of Record

Assigned District Judge

Receiving Magistrate Judge

Case 2:09-cv-11259-VAR-MJH ECF No. 9, PageID.85 Filed 05/20/09 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:09-cv-11259-VAR-MJH ECF No. 9, PageID.86 Filed 05/20/09 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.13
                                                                   -------------

       DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS COMPENSATION

         The compensation payable to all of the Company's non-employee directors
is as follows:

             o    An annual cash retainer of $30,000;

             o    An additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 for the chair of
                  the Audit Committee and $5,000 for each other member of the
                  Audit Committee;

             o    An additional annual cash retainer of $5,000 for the chair of
                  the Compensation Committee and $2,500 for each other member of
                  the Compensation Committee; and

             o    An additional annual cash retainer of $3,500 for the chair of
                  the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $2,500
                  for each other member of the Nominating and Corporate
                  Governance Committee.

Michael J. Joyce will also receive a $25,000 fee in 2006 for his services as
chair of the board committee conducting a search for the new Chief Executive
Officer of the Company. In addition, non-employee directors each receive an
annual stock option grant pursuant to the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan. The
amount of shares subject to the option grant and the exercise price will be
determined by the Company's Board of Directors in August 2006.

         On February 20, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company reaffirmed
the current annual salaries of each of the following executive officers in the
respective following amounts:

         Name                                               Salary
         ----                                               ------
         John E. (Jack) Parker                              $ 450,000

         Lawrence H. Fine                                   $ 350,000

         Leslie H. Gordon                                   $ 244,625

         Patricia A. Parker                                 $ 215,000

         Jeffrey C. Gerstel                                 $ 215,000

         Janet Parker                                       $ 175,000
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Victor M. Garcia, Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 9, 2007



/s/ VICTOR M. GARCIAVictor M. Garcia Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mass Hysteria Entertainment Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan Grodnik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: October 13, 2010








By: /s/ Dan Grodnik


Dan Grodnik


CEO, CFO, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-20674

ANTHONY A. JAMES,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Before the court is Defendant Anthony James’s motion for reconsideration of the

court’s February 3, 2012 order. The court denied Defendant’s request for a descriptive

list of exhibits and trial stipulations, stating that it does not retain exhibits after the

conclusion of a trial and neither an exhibit list nor a list of stipulations was filed on the

docket. (2/03/2012, Dkt. # 77.) In its response to Defendant’s motion for

reconsideration, the Government indicates that during a colloquy on April 14, 2010, the

court, Defendant’s counsel, and the Government discussed the filing of a final exhibit list

and trial stipulations the following day. (Gov’t’s Resp. to Def.’s Mot. Reconsideration ¶

5.) Counsel, however, never filed the documents with the court. (Id.) The Government

has apparently located two documents in its electronic case file that correspond with

Defendant’s requests and has attached them as exhibits to its response. (Id. at ¶ 6.) 

The Government also attests to the authenticity of the documents by stating that each

document’s “electronic stamp” indicates that the documents were last modified on April

15, 2010, the day after counsel and the court discussed filing the documents on the
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\08-20674.JAMES.Deny.Moot.Reconsideration.jrc.wpd

2

docket. (Id. ¶ 6.) Because Defendant is now in possession of the Government’s exhibit

list and the trial stipulations, his motion is moot. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for reconsideration [Dkt. # 78] is

DENIED AS MOOT.

 s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: May 31, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, May 31, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522
#### Alvin BELL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 68383.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 13, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jill C. LaHue, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).