alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.25

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 2004

EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2004

|NAME:          |  | DANA KAMMERSGARD   |  | 
|-------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|TITLE:         |  | President          |  | 
|BASE SALARY:   |  | $330,000           |  | 
|ON-PLAN BONUS: |  | 60% of Base Salary |  | 
|              

EXHIBIT C

By signing this Executive Compensation Plan 2004 ("Plan"), you hereby agree that the terms of this Plan shall be in addition to the terms of the Employment
Agreement between you and Dot Hill dated August 2, 1999 ("Employment Agreement"), and shall replace and supercede the terms of Exhibit C of the Employment Agreement with respect to your
base salary and bonus for the year 2004. Otherwise, the terms of your Employment Agreement remain unchanged. For any period of time after December 31, 2004, your base salary and bonus shall be
subject to change, as determined by Dot Hill's Board of Directors and/or Compensation Committee ("BOD").

BONUS

Bonus is calculated based on a percentage of base salary.

Bonus
will be paid once annually as soon as practicable after an audit of the Company's fiscal year 2004 results has been completed and after the Dot Hill Board of Directors and/or
Compensation Committee ("BOD") has approved the payment.

70%
of bonus potential is tied to Dot Hill's overall 2004 forecast dated 07/26/2004 and presented to the BOD on 08/02/2004. Eligible payout for 2004 is 46.69%.



20%
of bonus potential is subjective and may be tied to individual departmental goals and performance.

10%
of bonus potential is subjective and will be based on the Company's performance with respect to management of its working capital and cash flow.

TERMS

|Jim Lambert, CEO |  | Dana Kammersgard, President
|---------------- |  | ---------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. William Frank LOEBLEIN, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65143.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

April 30, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied June 4, 1996.

Case Transferred to Supreme Court Aug. 20, 1996.

Case Retransferred to Court of Appeals Dec. 17, 1996.

Original Opinion Reinstated Jan. 3, 1997.

Deborah B. Wafer, Dist. Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., GEORGE M. FLANIGAN, Senior Judge, and HOFF, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence after a jury-waived trial of four counts of deviate sexual assault in the first degree in violation of § 566.070 RSMo 1978 and two counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of § 566.040 RSMo 1978. He was sentenced to consecutive terms of seven years imprisonment on each count.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Xylan Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
3944) on Form S-8 of Xylan Corporation of our report dated January 31, 1997,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Xylan Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and related schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of
Xylan Corporation


                                         /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 28, 1997
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 650
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 2 of 20 Pg ID 651
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 3 of 20 Pg ID 652
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 4 of 20 Pg ID 653
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 5 of 20 Pg ID 654
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 6 of 20 Pg ID 655
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 7 of 20 Pg ID 656
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 8 of 20 Pg ID 657
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 9 of 20 Pg ID 658
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 10 of 20 Pg ID 659
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 11 of 20 Pg ID 660
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 12 of 20 Pg ID 661
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 13 of 20 Pg ID 662
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 14 of 20 Pg ID 663
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 15 of 20 Pg ID 664
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 16 of 20 Pg ID 665
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 17 of 20 Pg ID 666
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 18 of 20 Pg ID 667
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 19 of 20 Pg ID 668
2:06-cr-20421-PDB-MKM Doc # 85 Filed 07/17/14 Pg 20 of 20 Pg ID 669
exhibit_10-8.htm








EXHIBIT 10.8


 


 


 


Fee Settlement Agreement


 


Recitals


 


AGREEMENT entered into this 18th day of March, 2013, by and between Seafarer Exploration Corp (the "Company"), and ClearTrust, LLC ("Transfer Agent").


 


WHEREAS, the Transfer Agent has incurred various reimbursable expenses resulting directly from acting as transfer agent for the Company, and the Company is obligated to reimburse the Transfer Agent for said expenses.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Transfer Agent hereby agree to settle the amount owed to the Transfer Agent with shares of restricted stock. The parties hereto agree as follows:


 


I. Legal Expenses Owed


 


The transfer agent has incurred reimbursable expenses and invoiced the Company as detailed in the table below:


 



	
Date of Invoice to Company

	
Invoice Number

	
Amount

	
Reason for Invoice


	
1/10/13

	
1968

	
$1,947.50

	
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs.


Seafarer" case


	
1/17/13

	
1988

	
$5,439.55

	
Legal expenses related to "Eldred vs.


Seafarer" case


	
3/6/13

	
2114

	
$3,055.75

	
Legal expenses related to 'Eldred vs.


Seafarer" case


	  	
TOTAL

	
$10,442.80

	  










2. Issuance of Stock


The Company shall reimburse the Transfer Agent cashless with a non-refundable payment of 1,044,280 shares of restricted common stock of the Company. The Transfer Agent may sell the shares in the public marketplace in reliance on Rule 144 or negotiate the sale of the shares in a privately negotiated transaction. Regardless the manner of sale, the Transfer Agent must apply all proceeds gained by the sale of the shares to the open invoices listed in the table above.


 


Should the Transfer Agent realize less proceeds than the total due in the table above, the Transfer Agent may request up to 1,000,000 additional shares of stock or a cash payment to cover the difference in the amount owed.


 


5. Severability


In the event that any one or more provisions herein shall for any reason be held•to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof.


 


 










  





1











  













6. Miscellaneous


This Agreement (i) constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall supersede all prior understandings and agreements as to such subject matter; (ii) may be amended or modified only by a writing executed by the party against whom enforcement is sought; (iii) shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective heirs, administrators, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto; and (iv) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Florida.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fee Settlement Agreement as of the date and year first above written.


 


CLEARTRUST, LLC:


 


 









Kara Kennedy, Director


 


SEAFARER EXPLOTION CORP.


 



 


/s/ Kyle Kennedy











Kyle Kennedy, Director


 


 


 


2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Masaaki (John) Nishibori, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2010



By:

/s/ MASAAKI (JOHN) NISHIBORIMasaaki (John) Nishibori
President and Chief Executive Officer
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 1 of 22 Pg ID 1
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 2 of 22 Pg ID 2
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 3 of 22 Pg ID 3
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 4 of 22 Pg ID 4
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 5 of 22 Pg ID 5
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 6 of 22 Pg ID 6
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 7 of 22 Pg ID 7
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 8 of 22 Pg ID 8
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 9 of 22 Pg ID 9
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 10 of 22 Pg ID 10
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 11 of 22 Pg ID 11
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 12 of 22 Pg ID 12
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 13 of 22 Pg ID 13
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 14 of 22 Pg ID 14
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 15 of 22 Pg ID 15
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 16 of 22 Pg ID 16
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 17 of 22 Pg ID 17
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 18 of 22 Pg ID 18
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 19 of 22 Pg ID 19
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 20 of 22 Pg ID 20
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 21 of 22 Pg ID 21
2:09-mc-50536-MOB-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 05/01/09 Pg 22 of 22 Pg ID 22
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1401

BRENDA L. MCINTYRE; TAMMY M. CARPENTER; DONNA

W. JOYNER; LISA MCCALL, individually and on

behalf of all other persons similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

GEORGE I. REID,

Defendant - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL ESPY, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-184-2)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George I. Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for administration of assets. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reid v.

United States Dep't of Agric., No. CA-94-184-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 19,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
James L. Lambert, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Dot Hill Systems Corp.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 15, 2005

|/s/JAMES L. LAMBERTJames L. Lambert Chief Executive
Officer |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 

---



QuickLinks
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Richard A. Robert                                                                                                       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard      A. Robert                                                                                                           |
| Executive      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) December      19,      2008 |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MINHAS ENERGY CONSULTANTS,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Manmohan Minhas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Manmohan Minhas
                                         --------------------------
Date: May 1, 2007                        Manmohan Minhas
                                         Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul F. Eckstein (#001822)

PEckstein@perkinscoie.com

Daniel C. Barr (#010149)

DBarr@perkinscoie.com

John H. Gray (#028107)

JHGray@perkinscoie.com

PERKINS COIE LLP

2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788

Telephone: 602.351.8000

Facsimile: 602.648.7000

DocketPHX@perkinscoie.com

Kathleen E. Brody (#026331)

KBrody@acluaz.org

ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA

3707 North 7th Street, Suite 235

Phoenix, Arizona 85013

Telephone: 602.650.1854

Attorneys for Amicus ACLU of Arizona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB

ACLU OF ARIZONA’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS 

CURIAE BRIEF REGARDING 

FIRST AMENDMENT 

CONSIDERATIONS

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 620 Filed 05/28/19 Page 1 of 3
-1-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 and LRCiv 7.2, the ACLU of Arizona, the state affiliate 

of the national American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”) moves for leave to file an amicus 

curiae brief narrowly focused on First Amendment issues at issue in this case. The parties 

do not oppose this Motion.

The ACLU is a statewide nonpartisan, nonprofit organization with a long history of 

protecting the constitutional rights of Arizona’s people. Part of that history has included 

filing lawsuits and amicus curiae briefs in both state and federal courts on a wide range of 

constitutional and other civil rights issues, including the First Amendment. This case raises 

important free speech concerns that are at the core of the ACLU’s mission. The ACLU, 

therefore, requests that the Court accept its brief as filed and consider it in connection with 

Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss and, if necessary, throughout the remainder of the 

case.

A copy of the proposed brief has been lodged with this Motion.

Dated: May 28, 2019 PERKINS COIE LLP

By: /s/ Daniel C. Barr

Paul F. Eckstein (#001822)

Daniel C. Barr (#010149)

John H. Gray (#028107)

2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788

ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA

Kathleen E. Brody

3707 North 7th Street, Suite 235

Phoenix, Arizona 85013

Attorneys for Amicus ACLU of Arizona

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 620 Filed 05/28/19 Page 2 of 3
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 28, 2019, I electronically transmitted the attached 

documents to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

s/ Marie van Olffen

78204-0012/144515571.1

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 620 Filed 05/28/19 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-31282

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VERNON HINKLE, III,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:05-CR-222-1

Before ELROD, SOUTHWICK, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vernon Hinkle, III,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hinkle has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 16, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-31282 Document: 00515161460 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2019
No. 18-31282

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-31282 Document: 00515161460 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2019
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: November 4, 2009
    
    /s/ Douglas Godshall

Douglas GodshallChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Esau TRUST, Appellant, v. Mary JOHNSON, Records Officer, Respondent.

No. WD 52073.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 25, 1996.

Esau Trust, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from order denying petition for a writ of mandamus.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**  **

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Paul Donaldson, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp.

 

Date: September 23, 2013

 

By:	*/s/ Paul Donaldson*	

Paul Donaldson

Chief Executive Officer