alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32**
















**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**




















The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Ross Harbottle, President
      and
      Principal Accounting Officer of Sidewinder Explorations Inc. hereby certifies
      that:





1.
      the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sidewinder
      Explorations Inc.











Date:
      February 24, 2008 **SIDEWINDER
      EXPLORATIONS INC** .,
      Registrant




/s/
      Ross Harbottle




By:
      Ross
      Harbottle, President and Principal Accounting Officer
#### Willene YOUNG, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. COLUMBIA NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., INC., et al, Defendants/Respondents.

No. 70002.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Stephen J. Nangle, Nangle & Nangle, P.C., St. Louis, for Plaintiff/Appellant.

Pricilla F. Gunn, Steven D. Jensen, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for Defendants/Respondents.

Before CRANE, P. J., and SMITH and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Willene Young (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s order of summary judgment on four counts of her petition. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the points on appeal are without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then-information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2012 (the Report), I, Vincent
McNelley, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                            
|-------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  |  |                                                                                            
|               |  | 
|April 16, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Vincent McNelley                                                                       
|               |  |  |  | Vincent McNelley Acting
Principal Financial Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's December 31, 1997 audited balance sheet, income statement and cash
flow statement, and notes thereto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,486,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,555,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,830,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                178,667,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    431,644,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  5,832,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             654,222,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 444,211,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                47,271,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,202,000
<LONG-TERM>                                104,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,113,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             654,222,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             33,369,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           11,986,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               514,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            45,869,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          17,140,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          26,496,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       19,373,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           1,115,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             15,724,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,895,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   8,895,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,565,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.11
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,847,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                             11,700,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             7,334,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                2,155,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   653,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            5,832,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         5,832,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Edward J.Klingele, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Staten IslandBancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                    The Annual reporton Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

 

(2)                                    The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |           |   |   |   |   | By:    | /s/ Edward J. Klingele    |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |           |   |   |   |   |   | Edward J. Klingele        |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |   | Senior Vice President and |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |   |                      |
| Date:  | March 31, 2003 |   |   |   |   |   |                      |

 

 

----
Cite as 2023 Ark. 55



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE RESPONSE TO THE COVID - 19 PANDEMIC

–– RE TURN TO PRE PANDEMIC STANDARD FOR FINDING OF GOOD - CAUSE DELAYS UNDER SPEEDY

- TRIAL RULE Opinion Delivered : March 30 , 202 3

PER CURIAM Today, the court announces a return to the pre - COVID - 19 - pandemic standard for the finding of “good - cause” delays for speedy - trial purposes. Generally, when a defendant makes a prima faci e showing of a speedy - trial violation, the burden shifts to the State to show that the delay was the result of the defendant’s conduct or was otherwise justif ied pursuant

to one or more of the excludable periods outlined in Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedu re 28.3
. E.g. , State v. Crawford , 373 Ark. 95, 281 S.W.3d 736 (2008)

. One of the excludable periods outline d in Rule 28.3 is a “ period [] of delay for good cause.” Ark. R. Crim. P

. 28.3(h). Thus, prior to the pandemic, the State bore the burden of proving “ good cause ” to exclude a period of delay under subsection (h). During the pandem ic, however, this court suspend ed in - person proceedings and jury trials at various times and instituted a presumption that delays “due to precautions against the COVID - 19 pandemic ” consti tute “good cause” under Rule 28.3(h). See In re Response to the COVID
- 19 Pandemic

— Resumption of Jury Trials , 2021 Ark. 72 , at 2 (per curiam) ; In re Response to the COVID
- 19 Pandemic , 2020 Ark. 384, at 3 (per curiam) ; In re Response to the COVID
- 19 Pandemic , 2020 Ark. 116 , at 3 (per curiam).2

Due to the waning of the pandemic, the court finds that the presumption instituted in favor of the State for periods of delay due to precautions against COVID - 19 is no longer
necessary . Effective immediately, future delays due to COVID - 19 precautions will no longer be presumed “ good cause

. ” As was required before the pandemic, when a defendant presents a prima faci e showing of a speedy - trial violation, the State will bear the burden of proving whet her any delay constitutes “good cause” without the benefit of any presumption . The court understands that COVID - 19 precautions may have resulted in recent continuances that are ongoing. In cases where the most recent continuance was granted due to COVID - 19 precautions, the State shall continue to enjoy the presumption of “good cause” until (i) the date on which any other continuance is granted , or (ii) the date on which the case is currently set for trial , whichever occurs first. It is so ORDERED.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-60468

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONNIE HOWARD McPHAIL, ET AL.,

Defendants,

LOU CAROLYN McPHAIL and

SARAH TRILBY McPHAIL,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Mississippi

(3:92-CR-044)

_________________________________________________________________

July 17, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this appeal from denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255,

Sarah and Lou Carolyn McPhail contend that the Supreme Court's

December 1995 decision in Bailey v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 501

(1995), requires that their convictions on Count 6 of the

indictment be reversed. They argue that, in the light of Bailey,
-2-

the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions under 18

U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) and that the district court incorrectly

instructed the jury on the elements of the offense.

Citing United States v. Graham, 688 F.2d 746, 747 (11th Cir.

1982), the government has filed a Confession of Error in lieu of an

appellate brief on the merits. The government asserts that, under

Bailey, there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury's

verdict on the firearms count. The government concedes that "[t]he

only evidence of record concerning the use or carriage of the six

firearms charged against the Appellants is the testimony of the

seizing officers that they were found loaded in unspecified

locations" in the McPhails' home. The government states that it

does not oppose the vacation of the appellants' convictions and

sentences on Count 6 of the indictment for using and carrying a

firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime.

Accordingly, the convictions and sentences under 18 U.S.C. §

924(c)(1), as reflected in Count 6 of the indictment, are VACATED

as to each appellant and the case is REMANDED to the district court

for resentencing.

VACATED and REMANDED.
#### Richard BIASE, Doug Denhing, David Eubank, Michael Fortin, Mary Stringer and Nancy Zara, Respondents, v. LONGVIEW PROPERTIES, LTD d/b/a Longview Properties, L.P., by its sole General Partner, Four Bar Co. LFP II, L.P., Ltd., W. Dean Goodman, Jolene Schmitz and Joe Weatherford Construction Co., Appellant.

No. WD 50514.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 26, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1996.

Donald P. Herron, Rodney K. Murrow, Herron & Lewis, Kansas City, for Respondents.

Leonard Rose, Michael Strong, Kansas City, for Appellants.

Before: SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

An appeal from entry of an injunction against the developer and owner of real estate in a subdivision based on front foot requirements in the recorded covenants. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

James C. Grant (admitted pro hac vice) 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

920 Fifth Ave, Suite 3300 

Seattle, Washington 98104-1610 

Telephone: (206) 757-8096 

Facsimile: (206) 757-7096 

Email: jamesgrant@dwt.com 

Counsel for Defendants Michael Lacey and James Larkin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SPL 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO LATE 

FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR FURTHER 

CLARIFICATION RE ORDER 

ALLOWING THE GOVERNMENT 

TO CONTINUE REVIEW OF 

PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS 

James Larkin and Michael Lacey, by and through their undersigned counsel, 

respectfully move the Court for an order granting leave to late file their Reply in 

Support of Motion for Further Clarification re Government’s Review of Privileged 

Communications (Doc. 452). The Reply is being filed late because undersigned 

counsel had medical issues (back problems) requiring doctors’ visits and treatment, 

and missed the deadline for filing the Reply as a result. 

Counsel conferred with government counsel regarding this request. The 

government, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin M. Rapp, has indicated that it 

does not oppose this request. 

For the above reasons, Mr. Larkin and Mr. Lacey respectfully move for leave to 

late file their Reply in Support of Motion for Further Clarification re Government’s 

Review of Privileged Communications. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 478 Filed 02/27/19 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 27th day of February, 2019. 

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 

By: ____________________________ 

James C. Grant 

 Attorney for Defendants 

Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 478 Filed 02/27/19 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 27, 2019, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing document was electronically filed with the Clerk of the United States District 

Court of the District of Arizona by using the CM/ECF system, and that service will be 

accomplished by the CM/ECF system to all counsel of record. 

s/ James C. Grant 

James C. Grant 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 478 Filed 02/27/19 Page 3 of 3
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, Bernie J. Hoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Pengram Corporation (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended February 29, 2008, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                           



| | By:    | /s/
      Bernie J. Hoing  
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | BERNIE J. HOING            
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | April 13, 2008             
| |        |                            





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34415]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16774]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 2, 1996 / 
Notices

[[Page 34415]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agicultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Seedbiotics of Caldwell, Idaho, and exclusive license for all uses in 
the field of plant seed coatings to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 
08/233,173 filed April 26, 1994, ``Non-Separable Starch-Oil 
Compositions.'' Notice of Availability was published in the Federal 
Register on October 24, 1994.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 31, 1996.

ADDRESS: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
Room 415, Building 005, BARC-West, Baltimore Boulevard, Beltsville, 
Maryland 20705-2350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Seedbiotics has submitted a 
complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective 
exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the 
terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective 
exclusive license may be granted unless, within sixty days from the 
date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service 
receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant 
of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
R.M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 96-16774 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN J. MURRAY,

CIVIL NO. 08-15147

 Plaintiff, 

HONORABLE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

vs. 

 HONORABLE MONA K. MAJZOUB 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

of TREASURY, SECRETARY of, et al, 

 

 Defendants. /

ORDER FOR SUBMISSION AND DETERMINATION 

OF MOTION WITHOUT ORAL HEARING

A Motion TO Determine Sufficiency of Answers and Objections to Request for

Admissions (Docket no. 48) was filed on April 12, 2010. The motion was filed by the Plaintiff

in the above-entitled cause.

A Response, including a written brief, is to be filed on or before April 28, 2010.

A Joint Statement of Resolved and Unresolved Issues to be filed on or before May 31,

2010.

This Motion will be decided upon by the briefs. No hearing will be scheduled.

Inquiries may be directed to the deputy clerk at 313-234-5206.

Dated: April 26, 2010 s/Mona K. Majzoub 

 MONA K. MAJZOUB

 UNTIED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify a copy of this Order was served upon Counsel of Record on April 26,

2010. s/ Lisa C. Bartlett 

 Case Manager 

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM Document 51 Filed 04/26/10 Page 1 of 1