alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16311]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Notice of Receipt of Applications for Permit

    The following applicants have applied for a permit to conduct 
certain activities with endangered species. This notice is provided 
pursuant to Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.):

PRT-816287

Applicant: Fred Brindle, Sandusky, OH.

    The applicant requests a permit to import a sport-hunted cheetah 
(Acinonyx jubatus) from Namibia for the purpose of enhancement of the 
survival of the species.

PRT-816358

Applicant: William L. Porteous, Cypress, TX.

    The applicant requests a permit to import the sport-hunted trophy 
of one male bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus dorcas) culled from a captive 
herd maintained under the management program of the Republic of South 
Africa, for the purpose of enhancement of the survival of the species.

PRT-816359

Applicant: Ernest Heuer, Strathmore, CA.

    The applicant requests a permit to import the sport-hunted trophy 
of one male bontebok (Damaliscus pygargus dorcas) culled from a captive 
herd maintained under the management program of the Republic of South 
Africa, for the purpose of enhancement of the survival of the species.
    Written data or comments should be submitted to the Director, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North 
Fairfax Drive, Room 430, Arlington, Virginia 22203 and must be received 
by the Director within 30 days of the date of this publication.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Office of Management Authority, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Room 
430, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone: (703/358-2104); FAX: (703/358-
2281).

    Dated: June 21, 1996.
Mary Ellen Amtower,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 96-16311 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


         1.       Liberty Acquisition Corporation, a Tennessee corporation and
                  wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

         2.       Special Omega Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation
                  and wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

         3.       Pentegra Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly
                  owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

         4.       Edge Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and
                  wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

         5.       TW Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and
                  wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.
**Exhibit
      99.4**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of Siga
      Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended January 31, 2008, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rohit
      Singh, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:
      February 13, 2008





ROHIT
      SINGH




Rohit
      Singh


Chief
      Accounting Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer and Director





-1-
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33656-33657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16171]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8670]
RIN 1545-AU20


Revision of Section 482 Cost Sharing Regulations; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final regulations (TD 
8670), which were published in the Federal Register on Monday, May 13, 
1996 (61 FR 21955) relating to qualified cost sharing arrangements.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 13, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Sams, (202) 622-3840 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections are 
under section 482 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations contain errors which may prove 
to be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the final regulations (TD 8670), 
which are the subject of FR Doc. 96-11781, is corrected as follows:


Sec. 1.482-7  [Corrected]

    On page 21956, column 2, instructional ``Par. 3.'', is corrected by 
revising item g. to read as follows:
    g. By redesignating the introductory text of paragraph (j)(2) 
following the heading and paragraphs (j)(2)(i) through (j)(2)(v) as the 
introductory text of paragraph (j)(2)(i) and paragraphs (j)(2)(i)(A) 
through (j)(2)(i)(E),

[[Page 33657]]

respectively; and, by adding a heading to newly designated paragraph 
(j)(2)(i).
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 96-16171 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
exhibit109.htm


    Exhibit
10.9

    


    Schedule
of Agreements with Executive Officers

    


    The
Company has entered into Change-in-Control Agreements with the Executive
Officers Listed Below.  Each agreement is substantially identical in
all material respects to the form agreement and amendments thereto set forth in
Exhibits 10.6, 10.7, and 10.8 to this 10-K report.

    


    
      	
              Executive
      Officer

            	
              Agreement

            	
              Date

            
	
              Joseph
      E. Abbott

               

            	
              Change-in-Control
      Agreement

            	
              May
      1, 2003

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              December
      19, 2008

            
	
              Michael
      A. Anderson

               

            	
              Second
      Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Agreement

            	
              May
      1, 2003

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              December
      18, 2008

            
	
              Steven
      A. Ellers

               

            	
              Second
      Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Agreement

            	
              March
      25, 2000

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              May
      1, 2001

            
	
              Amendment
      #2

            	
              December
      22, 2008

            
	
              William
      J. Federici

               

            	
              Change-in-Control
      Agreement

            	
              April
      28, 2004

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              December
      18, 2008

            
	
              John
      R. Gailey III

               

            	
              Second
      Amended and Restated Change-in-Control Agreement

            	
              March
      25, 2000

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              May
      1, 2001

            
	
              Amendment
      #2

            	
              December
      18, 2008

            
	
              Robert
      S. Hargesheimer

               

            	
              Change-in-Control
      Agreement

            	
              May
      1, 2003

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              December
      19, 2008

            
	
              Richard
      D. Luzzi

               

            	
              Change-in-Control
      Agreement

            	
              June
      3, 2002

            
	
              Amendment
      #1

            	
              December
      22, 2008

            
	
              Donald
      A. McMillan

            	
              Change-in-Control
      Agreement

            	
              February
      12, 2008

            
	
              Matthew
      T. Mullarkey

            	
              Change-in-Control
      Agreement

            	
              July
      28, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Philip Cook
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Thomas F. DardenPhilip Cook
    
    
    
    
    
    Thomas F. DardenSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3848

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include removal of graffiti within

the meaning of transportation enhancement activity.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 1996

Mr. BORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to include removal

of graffiti within the meaning of transportation enhancement activity.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the last undesignated paragraph of section 101(a)

4 of title 23, United States Code, (relating to transportation

5 enhancement activities) is amended by adding at the end

6 the following: ‘‘Such term includes removal of graffiti from

7 a highway, from a transit facility, and from any building

8 or other facility owned by the United States or a State
2

•HR 3848 IH

1 or local government if the graffiti is visible from a highway

2 or transit facility.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Inconnection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of RCN Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,respectively (the “Report”), Michael T. Sicoli, as Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company./s/ MICHAEL T. SICOLI
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16403]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Supplementary Agreement on Social Security Between the United 
States and Germany; Entry Into Force

    The Commissioner of Social Security gives notice that a 
supplementary agreement entered into force on May 1, 1996, which amends 
the Social Security agreement between the United States (U.S.) and 
Germany that has been in effect since December 1, 1979. The 
supplementary agreement, which was signed on March 6, 1995, was 
concluded pursuant to section 233 of the Social Security Act.
    The supplementary agreement updates and clarifies several 
provisions in the original U.S.-German Social Security agreement. Its 
primary purpose, however, is to permit the payment of German benefits 
to certain ethnic German Jews who migrated to the U.S. from parts of 
Eastern Europe that were overrun by the Nazis. People who qualify will 
receive monthly Social Security benefits from Germany based on the time 
they spent working in their former homelands, even though they may 
never have worked in Germany.
    Individuals who wish to obtain copies of the supplementary 
agreement or want general information about its provisions may write to 
the Social Security Administration, Office of International Policy, 
Post Office Box 17741, Baltimore, Maryland 21235. Individuals who wish 
to obtain information about the provisions affecting ethnic German Jews 
from Eastern Europe should contact the nearest German consulate.

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
Shirley S. Chater,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 96-16403 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY HOLDER,

Petitioner,

v. Case Number: 09-10973

CATHERINE S. BAUMAN,

Respondent. 

 /

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Petitioner Gregory Holder, a state inmate, has filed a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s

“Motion for Default Judgment” in which Petitioner points to Respondent’s failure to

timely answer his petition. In other pleadings before the court, Petitioner acknowledges

that Respondent actually attempted to file an answer to his petition, but inadvertently

filed the answer on a separate, related, docket. (See, e.g., 11/18/09 Resp. at 2-3; see

also 09-10954, 11/18/09 Resp at 2.) The court will deny the motion.

A default judgment is generally unavailable in a habeas-corpus proceeding on

the ground that government officials failed to file a timely response to the petition. See,

e.g., Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 138 (6th Cir. 1970). Mahaday v. Cason, 222 F.Supp.

2d 918, 921 -922 (E.D. Mich. 2002). Petitioner at all times bears the burden to show

that he is in custody in violation of the United States Constitution. Allen, 424 F.2d at

138. “The failure of State officials to file a timely return does not relieve the prisoner of

his burden of proof. . . . Despite the delinquency of the State, the District Court was

2:09-cv-10973-RHC-VMM Doc # 10 Filed 12/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 33
2

obligated to decide the case on its merits.” Id.

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Motion for Default Judgment” [Dkt. # 8] is

DENIED.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 30, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, December 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-10973.HOLDER.Deny.Default2254.chd.2.wpd

2:09-cv-10973-RHC-VMM Doc # 10 Filed 12/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 34
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October 27, 2010 | /s/ Qingqing Wu                    |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                        | Qingqing      Wu                   |
|                        | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                        | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3667

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude tips from gross

income.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1996

Mr. CRANE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude

tips from gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF TIPS FROM GROSS INCOME.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap5 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

6 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended

7 by redesignating section 137 as section 138 and by insert8 ing after section 136 the following new section:
2

•HR 3667 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 137. TIPS.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall not include

3 tips.

4 ‘‘(b) REGULATIONS PRESCRIBED BY THE SEC5 RETARY.—The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations

6 as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this sec7 tion.’’

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

9 The Secretary of the Treasury shall, within 90 days after

10 the date of the enactment of this Act, submit to the Com11 mittee on Ways and Means recommendations for technical

12 and conforming amendments to the Internal Revenue

13 Code of 1986 which the Secretary of the Treasury consid14 ers appropriate as a result of the amendments made by

15 subsection (a).

16 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—The table of sections

17 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

18 is amended by striking out the item relating to section

19 137 and by inserting in lieu thereof the following:

‘‘Sec. 137. Tips.

‘‘Sec. 138. Cross references to other Acts.’’

20 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

21 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to

22 tips received after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS GUEDRY, #443348

Plaintiff,

v.

DAN RIOPELLE, JOHN DOE, 

NURSE JANE DOE, and 

OFFICER JOHN DOE, 

Defendants.

 /

CASE NUMBER: 09-11522

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

AND GRANTING GAIL STALEY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, Nicholas Guedry, filed a complaint alleging that Defendants violated his

constitutional rights through their deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. The

case was referred to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon for all pretrial proceedings. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 8, 2010, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the

Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Magistrate Judge informed the

parties that objections to the R&R must be filed within fourteen days of service and that a

party’s failure to file objections would waive any further right of appeal. See R&R at 8; 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

Because no objection has been filed in this case, the parties waived their right to

review and appeal. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation,

GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claims

against Staley with prejudice. Further, because the sole remaining Defendant, has never

been served, and the time for service has expired, this Court DISMISSES all claims against

Guinn without prejudice.
2

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: December 9, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon Plaintiff (last known address) and counsel of

record on this date by ordinary mail and/or electronic filing.

_____s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of



The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Interwoven, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin W. Brauns, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | that information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Interwoven, Inc. for the fiscal periods
covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/ MARTIN W. BRAUNS                
|                      |  | Martin W. Brauns                    
|                      |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Interwoven, Inc. and will be retained by Interwoven, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PATRICK CANNELLA

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1893

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 13, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge

.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY and MAKAR

, J J

. , and DAVIS, WILLIAM E., ASSOCIATE JUDGE,

CONCUR.