alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3768

To designate a United States Post Office to be located in Groton, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Augusta ‘Gusty’ Hornblower United States Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 10, 1996

Mr. BLUTE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To designate a United States Post Office to be located in

Groton, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Augusta ‘Gusty’ Hornblower United States Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The United States Post Office to be located at 80

5 Boston Road in Groton, Massachusetts, shall be des6 ignated and known as the ‘‘Augusta ‘Gusty’ Hornblower

7 United States Post Office’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United
2

•HR 3768 IH

1 States Post Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

2 to be a reference to the ‘‘Augusta ‘Gusty’ Hornblower

3 United States Post Office’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,480)
<INVENTORY>                                     67,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,329
<PP&E>                                          39,570
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,181
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,804
<SALES>                                        542,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               542,141
<CGS>                                          422,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  539,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (158)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,514
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       628
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,619)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (270)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,889)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### CENTURY FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Royal SCANLON, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 69741.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Before RHODES RUSSELL, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves operative facts and legal issues which are the same as those considered in *Century Financial Services Group, Ltd. v. Houston E. Bates, Jr., et al.,*934 S.W.2d 619 (Mo.App.E.D.1996).. The attorneys for both sides, lessee’s sole point on appeal and lessor’s response are identical. In deciding this appeal we adopt our decision in that case.

We affirm.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3718 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3718

   To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to 
 certain water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn 
  from warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before 
                            January 1, 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 1996

  Mr. Meehan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to 
 certain water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn 
  from warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before 
                            January 1, 1995.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 or any other 
provision of law, upon proper request filed with the Customs Service 
within 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry 
or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption--
            (1) that was made after December 31, 1988, and before 
        January 1, 1995, and
            (2) that, if it had been made on January 1, 1995--
                    (A) would have been claimed under subheading 
                6203.41.05 or 6204.61.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
                Schedule of the United States, and
                    (B) would have had a lower duty,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such entry or withdrawal had 
been made on January 1, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 ___________________________________ FORM 10-Q/A  xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 OR  oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________ Commission File Number: 001-33718 ________________________ BIOHEART, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ________________________ Florida65-0945967(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 13794 NW 4th Street, Suite 212, Sunrise, Florida 33325(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (954) 835-1500(Registrants telephone number, including area code) ______________
 Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share (Title of Class) _____________ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.045 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No x  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large accelerated filer  ̈Accelerated filer  ̈Non-accelerated filer  ̈Smaller reporting company x(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ̈ No  x.  As of August 6, 2013, there were 236,657,436 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share.  Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format Yes  o    No  x  EXPLANATORY NOTE: This Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is being filed solely for the purpose of adding the dates of the electronic signatures.
In all other matieral respects this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is unchanged.  SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Bioheart, Inc.Date: August 14, 2013By:/s/Mike TomasMike TomasChief Executive Officer &
President and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer















37
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-25 Filed 11/19/10 Page 12 of 12
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 148 (Thursday, July 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 44798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17538]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11311 and <greek-i>11312]


Missouri Disaster Number MO-00030

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Missouri (FEMA-1773-DR), dated 06/28/
2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/18/2008.
    Effective Date: 07/18/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/27/2008.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/30/2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Missouri, dated 06/28/2008 is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
06/01/2008 and continuing through 07/18/2008.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-17538 Filed 7-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FRED DANIEL REEVES,

Plaintiff, No. 09-CV-10825-DT

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

DONALD SPAULDING, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

At a session of said Court, held in the

 U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

 on January 8, 2010 

 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

 United States District Judge

This matter having come before the Court on the November 4, 2009 Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon recommending that

the Court grant Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s ifp status under § 1915(g) and

dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint, without prejudice; and no timely objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation having been filed; and the Court having reviewed the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and the Court’s file of this action and

having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation,

Defendants’ Motion should be granted and, as recommended by the Magistrate Judge, this

case should be dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice, and the Court being otherwise

2:09-cv-10825-GER-MAR Doc # 41 Filed 01/08/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 169
fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation of November 4, 2009 [Dkt. # 40] be, and hereby is, adopted by this

Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s

Report and Recommendation, Defendants’ Motion to Revoke In Forma Pauperis Status

[Dkt. # 32] be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED, in its

entirety, without prejudice.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: January 8, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 8, 2010 , I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the

Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following:

 Allan J. Soros , and I hereby certify that I have

mailed by United States Postal Service the paper to the following non-ECF participants:

 Fred Reeves, Jr., #241575, St. Louis Correctional Facility, 8585 N. Croswell Road, St. Louis, MI

48880 .

s/Ruth A. Brissaud 

Ruth A. Brissaud, Case Manager

(313) 234-5137

2:09-cv-10825-GER-MAR Doc # 41 Filed 01/08/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 170
ex10-27.htm


    
      
        

      

    

    Exhibit 10.27

     

    
 

    


    December
11, 2008

    


    


    Dr. J.
Taylor Wharton

    1332
Milford Street

    Houston,
Texas  77006

    


    Dear Dr.
Wharton:

    


    The
purpose of this letter is to confirm the automatic renewal of your Consulting
Agreement dated January 11, 2008 (the “Agreement”).

    


    Your
contract will automatically renew for an additional one-year period beginning
January 1, 2009, and ending December 31, 2009.  All other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same.

    


    Please
confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding with respect
to this matter by signing both originals of this letter and returning one to
me.

    


    Very
truly yours,

    


    


    


    Richard
C. Adkerson

    Chairman
of the Board

    FM
Services Company

    


    


    


    AGREED
TO AND ACCEPTED

    


    


    BY:        
/s/ Dr. J.
Taylor
Wharton                     
 1/5/2009    

    Dr. J. Taylor
Wharton                            Date
Michael M. Baden, M.D.  

15 West 53rd Street, Suite 18

New York, New York 10019

Telephone: (212) 397‐2732                     Facsimile: (212) 397‐2754

13 October 2009 

Via e­mail:  e.walsh@fiegerlaw.com

Giroux 

Rebecca Walsh, Esq. 

Fieger, Fieger, Kenney, Johnson & 

9390 West Ten Mile Road 

outhfield, Michigan 48075‐2463 

1

S

Re: William Ryan Smith, deceased

Dear Attorney Walsh: 

  The autopsy  findings showed that William Smith’s organs were entirely normal 

for his age and that he would have had a normal life expectancy if he had not died as he 

did. 

  Examination  of  the  Michigan  State  Police  Latent  Print  Unit  report  shows  that 

multiple prints were present on the plastic gun and none matched Mr. Smith’s prints. 

            Yours very truly, 

   

MMB:ph 

        Michael M. Baden, M.D. 

2:08-cv-15031-DML-MJH Doc # 28 Filed 10/14/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 373
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 21 (Thursday, January 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 5794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-1759]



[[Page 5794]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

A-570-922


Notice of Postponement of Preliminary Determination of 
Antidumping Duty Investigation: Raw Flexible Magnets from the People's 
Republic of China

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 31, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Blackledge or Shawn Higgins, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3518 or (202) 482-0679, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Postponement of Preliminary Determination

    On October 18, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the 
``Department'') initiated the antidumping duty investigation of raw 
flexible magnets from the People's Republic of China. See Notice of 
Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations: Raw Flexible Magnets 
from the People's Republic of China and Taiwan, 72 FR 59071 (July 24, 
2007) (``Initiation Notice''). The notice of initiation stated that, 
unless postponed, the Department would make its preliminary 
determination in these antidumping duty investigations no later than 
140 days after the date of the initiation. See Initiation Notice.
    On January 16, 2008, Magnum Magnetics Corporation (``Petitioner'') 
made a timely request pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e) for a fifty-day 
postponement of the preliminary determination in this investigation. 
Petitioner requested postponement of the preliminary determination 
because of the complexity of the case, the Department's unfamiliarity 
with the industry, and the difficult time schedule ahead.For the 
reasons identified by the Petitioner, and because there are no 
compelling reasons to deny the request, the Department is postponing 
the preliminary determination under section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''), by fifty days from February 29, 
2008 to April 19, 2008. However, as that date falls on a Saturday, the 
preliminary determination will be due no later than the next business 
day, Monday, April 21, 2008. The deadline for the final determination 
will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary 
determination, unless extended.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 733(c)(2) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).

    Dated: January 24, 2008.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-1759 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLARD L. SLOAN, EUGENE J.

WINNINGHAM, and JAMES L. KELLEY, 

on behalf of themselves and a similarly 

situated class, Case No. 09-cv-10918

Hon. Paul D. Borman

Plaintiffs, Magistrate Mona K. Majzoub

v. Class Action

BORGWARNER, INC., BORGWARNER 

FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLANS and

BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED 

TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________________/

EXHIBIT 14 

TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AS TO LIABILITY

2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 5423
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 2 of 13 Pg ID 5424
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 3 of 13 Pg ID 5425
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 4 of 13 Pg ID 5426
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 5 of 13 Pg ID 5427
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 6 of 13 Pg ID 5428
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 7 of 13 Pg ID 5429
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 8 of 13 Pg ID 5430
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 9 of 13 Pg ID 5431
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 10 of 13 Pg ID 5432
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 11 of 13 Pg ID 5433
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 12 of 13 Pg ID 5434
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 103-14 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 13 of 13 Pg ID 5435
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-87213, No. 333-43042, No. 333-91426, No. 333-109191, No. 333-126649, No.
333-144656) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2002 CEO
Option Plan, and Milestone Equity Incentive Plan of Scientific Learning
Corporation of our report dated March xx, 2009 with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Scientific Learning Corporation included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008. /s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan
 Francisco, CaliforniaMarch 5,
 2009
Index of Exhibits 

Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice

Exhibit A Jury Trial Day 1 AM & PM (Voir Dire) September 1, 2021 

Exhibit B Jury Trial Day 2 AM (Voir Dire) September 2, 2021 

Exhibit C Jury Trial Day 2 PM (Voir Dire) September 2, 2021

Exhibit D Jury Trial Day 3 AM (Voir Dire) September 3, 2021

Exhibit E Jury Trial Day 3 PM (Govt. Opening Statement) September 3, 2021

Exhibit F Jury Trial Day 4 AM (Defense Opening Bienert) September 8, 2021

Exhibit G Jury Trial Day 4 PM (Defense Openings of Feder, Eisenberg, Bertrand,

and Cambria; Fichtner Testimony) September 8, 2021

Exhibit H Jury Trial Day 5 AM (Adjourned Day re Covid) September 9, 2021

Exhibit I Jury Trial Day 6 AM (Fichtner Testimony; J. Svendgard Testimony)

September 10, 2021

Exhibit J Jury Trial Day 6 PM (Fichtner Testimony; J. Svendgard Testimony; N. 

Svendgard Testimony) September 10, 2021

Exhibit K Jury Trial Day 7 AM (Fichtner Testimony) September 13, 2021

Exhibit L Jury Trial Day 7 PM (Cooper Testimony) September 13, 2021

Exhibit M Jury Trial Day 8 AM (Mistrial Ruling) September 14, 2021

Exhibit N Transcript of December 4, 2020 Hearing

Exhibit O Dismissal Order from United States v. Lopez-Avila 4:10-cr-00035-CKJHCE

Exhibit P Correspondence with Govt. re Release of Funds, October 13, 2021

Exhibit Q Filed Under Seal WDWA Grand Jury Testimony, November 7, 2021

Exhibit R Filed Under Seal WDWA Vienneau Report

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1355-1 Filed 11/01/21 Page 1 of 1