alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 15.4**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Arcelor S.A.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-128742 on Form F-3 and in RegistrationStatement No. 333-107102 on Form S-8 of Mittal Steel Company N.V. (“Mittal”) of our report dated April 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Arcelor S.A. and subsidiaries (“the Group”) as ofDecember 31, 2006, and the related consolidated income statement, statement of cash flows, and statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the five months ended December 31, 2006, prepared in conformity with InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as adopted by the European Union, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 20-F of Mittal. 

Our qualified report dated April 16, 2007 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the following: 

IAS34 requires that interim financial statements be represented with comparative financial information. These consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared solely for the purposes of consolidating the Group into the consolidatedfinancial statements of Mittal as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Accordingly, no comparative financial information is presented. 

Our reportdated April 16, 2007 also contains the following explanatory paragraph: 

The consolidated financial statements are based on the historicalvalues of Arcelor S.A.’s assets and liabilities prior to its acquisition by Mittal and, accordingly, do not include the purchase price adjustments to such amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements of Mittal as a result of suchacquisition. 

/s/ **KPMG Audit S. à r.l.**

City ofLuxembourg 

Luxembourg 

April 16, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. (NY Bar No.1430909, admitted pro hac vice) 

Erin E. McCampbell (NY Bar No. 4480166, admitted pro hac vice) 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

pcambria@lglaw.com 

emccampbell@lglaw.com 

Attorneys for Michael Lacey 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB 

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR COUNSEL 

TO APPEAR BY PHONE OR 

VIDEOCONFERENCING AT MARCH 

20, 2023 HEARING 

NOW COMES the Defendant, Michael Lacey, by his attorney of record, to ask the Court 

to grant leave for his lawyer to appear by phone or videoconferencing at the March 20, 2023 Hearing 

in this matter. As good cause therefore, the Defendant submits the following: 

Mr. Lacey’s counsel is currently on trial in Erie County, New York in People v. Martinez, Erie 

Cnty. Sup. Ct. Case No. 01686-2020, defending another client who is charged with murder. The 

trial begins today, March 13, 2023, and is projected to last two weeks. It is not possible to travel to 

and from the District of Arizona for the March 20, 2023 Hearing while on trial in Erie County, New 

York at the same time. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1529 Filed 03/13/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Further, because the government has seized the majority of Mr. Lacey’s assets, and the 

limited pool of assets available for trial costs was substantially depleted during the first trial in this 

case, assets necessary for travel and accomodations are in short supply and need to be preserved for 

the upcoming trial. 

The Government does not object to this Motion. 

The Court will find attached a proposed Order. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 13th day of March, 2023, 

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

 By: /s/ Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

Attorneys for Michael Lacey 

On March 13, 2023, a PDF version 

of this document was filed with 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF 

System for filing and for Transmittal 

Of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the 

Following CM/ECF registrants: 

Kevin Rapp, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov 

Peter Kozinets, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov 

Daniel Boyle, daniel.boyle2@usdoj.gov 

Margaret Perlmeter, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

Andrew Stone, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov 

Austin Maxwell Berry, austin.berry2@usdoj.gov

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1529 Filed 03/13/23 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

VANDARLYN FISH,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 08-15274

v.

STATE OF MICHIGAN Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE

COMMISSION, et al.,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, Vandarlyn Fish, filed a pro se complaint on December 24, 2008, along with an

application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court finds Plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis to be facially sufficient and, therefore, grants Plaintiff’s motion to proceed

without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Gibson v. R.G. Smith Co., 915 F.2d 260,

262 (6th Cir. 1990).

Once a court grants a plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis, it must review

the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court “shall dismiss” the case if the court

finds that it is “(i) frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be

granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A complaint is frivolous under § 1915 if it lacks an arguable basis in

law or fact. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596,

600 (6th Cir. 1998) (stating that complaints can be dismissed a frivolous “only when the claim is

‘based on an indisputably meritless legal theory,’ or where a complaint’s ‘factual contentions are

5:08-cv-15274-JCO-MJH Doc # 4 Filed 02/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 16
-2-

clearly baseless’”).

To the extent the court understands the complaint, Plaintiff appears to assert that she was

repeatedly denied relief by the Michigan Supreme Court. It is unclear to the court what relief

she is seeking here. Construing Plaintiff’s complaint liberally, in light of her pro se status, the

court discerns no claim upon which relief may be granted or any legal basis for federal

jurisdiction.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma

pauperis is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara

United States District Judge

Date: February 2, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on

this date, February 2, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager

5:08-cv-15274-JCO-MJH Doc # 4 Filed 02/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 17
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

2AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER (6SHFLI\)

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS  

PAPER COPY

3')HPDLO

$6&,,HPDLO

14 DAYS  

7 DAYSH[SHGLWHG  

DAILY

 

HOURLY

 

REALTIME

 

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025(7+$121()250$7,

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Kevin M. Rapp 602-514-7500 8/12/21

U.S. Attorney's Office

40 N. Central Ave., Ste. 1800 Phoenix AZ 85004

CR-18-422-PHX-SMB Susan M. Brnovich 8/9/21

U.S. v. Michael Lacey, et al. Phoenix AZ

✔

✔

Final Pretrial Conference 8/9/21

✔

kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov; marjorie.dieckman@usdoj.gov

s/ Kevin M. Rapp (R21AZX90231)

8/12/21

✔

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1213 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-59035) of CPC of America, Inc. of our
report dated March 9, 2007, relating to the financial statements, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which
appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ CACCIAMATTA ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION


Irvine, California
March 14, 2007
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Tyrone DEVOIL, Defendant/Appellant. Tyrone DEVOIL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 62554, 64017.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 7, 1993.

John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his convictions, by a jury, of stealing from a person, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to a sixteen year prison term. Defendant also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b).
THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### M A N D A T E

TO THE 175TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on September 9, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Angel H. Longoria, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04

- 15

- 00263

- CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CR5599A

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these w ords:



## In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, these appeals are

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 9, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


The following table lists the Company's subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly-owned, except as provided below:

       Power-Electronics, Inc.                                Puerto Rico
       Poder Uno de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico
       Melcher Holding AG                                     Switzerland
       Melcher AG                                             Switzerland
       Domenic Melcher AG                                     Switzerland
       Melcher S.A.                                           France
       Melcher Ltd.                                           Great Britain
       Melcher S.r.l.                                         Italy
       Melcher GmbH                                           Germany
       Melcher B.V.                                           Netherlands
       Melcher Simp Ltd.                                      Ireland
       Melcher Produktion AG                                  Switzerland
       Melcher s.r.o.                                         Slovakia
       LR Crystal IMMO a.s.                                   Slovakia
       Melcher Inc.                                           USA
       Melcher Corp.                                          Canada
       International Power Devices, Inc.                      USA
V

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3701

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for each of 4 vessels.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 20, 1996

Mr. DEUTSCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for each

of 4 vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

4 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

5 June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 289), and section 12106

6 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transpor7 tation may issue a certificate of documentation with ap-
2

•HR 3701 IH

1 propriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

2 trade for each of the following vessels:

3 (1) RELENTLESS (United States official

4 number 287008).

5 (2) TECUMSEH (Canadian Registry number

6 815298).

7 (3) POLICY MAKER III (United States offi8 cial number 569223).

9 (4) QUIET SQUAW (United States official

10 number 998717).

Æ
**Exhibit 10.21****CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT**This Consent to Assignment (the “Consent”) is given as of this  7  day ofAugust, 2006, by Central Iowa Energy, LLC (“Central Iowa Energy”), located in Newton, Iowa.**RECITALS:**REG, LLC (f/k/a Renewable Energy Group, LLC) entered into a Design Build Agreementdated March 10, 2006, and an Agreement for Phase 1 Services dated July 13, 2005, with Central IowaEnergy with respect to the construction of their biodiesel facility (collectively “Agreements”).REG, LLC, InterWest, L.C., and West Central Cooperative joined their forces to expand upontheir biodiesel construction, management and marketing efforts by creating Renewable Energy Group,Inc. (“REG, Inc.”) on July 31, 2006. In order to be continuing to fulfill the obligations under theAgreements, Renewable Energy Group, Inc. would desire to confirm Central Iowa Energy’s consent toan assignment of REG, LLC’s rights in the Agreements to REG, Inc.Performance of the Agreements will continue under the same leadership and personnel, supportedby the same strategic partners as were involved previously under REG, LLC. By signature hereto,Renewable Energy Group, Inc. assumes and agrees to perform and discharge all obligations as setforth in the Agreements previously entered into by REG, LLC with Central Iowa Energy.       REG, LLC (f/k/a Renewable Energy Group, LLC) RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC.       By /s/ Nile Ramsbottom By /s/ Jeffrey Stroburg         Nile Ramsbottom, President   Jeffrey Stroburg, CEOCONSENT TO ASSIGNMENTCentral Iowa Energy hereby consents to the assignment of the Agreements to Renewable EnergyGroup, Inc.         CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC           By /s/ James Johnston, Chairman             (Title)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SYLVESTER WATKINS,

Petitioner, Case No. 09-11285

HON. JOHN CORBETT O’MEARA

v.

DEBRA SCUTT,

Respondent,

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the report and recommendation filed June 11, 2010, by

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives, as well as petitioner’s objection filed June 23, 2010, and

being fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is accepted and adopted

as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s application for writ of habeas corpus is

denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will deny petitioner a certificate of

appealability. 

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: July 21, 2010
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of

record on this date, July 21, 2010, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00629

- CR

Dwayne Chance Chadwick , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having r eviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgm ent of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael E. Golden, certify that:

1

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sun American Bancorp;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)

Intentionally omitted.

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants control over financial reporting.





Date: March 28, 2007



/s/ MICHAELE. GOLDEN

President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ECHOSTAR DBS CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THOSE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          25,308
<SECURITIES>                                     7,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,996
<INVENTORY>                                     76,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               241,582
<PP&E>                                       1,021,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,470,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          477,061
<BONDS>                                      1,488,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (588,137)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,470,173
<SALES>                                        963,605<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               985,909
<CGS>                                          588,103<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,116,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,111<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (294,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        71
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (294,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (294,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES SALES OF PROGRAMMING.
<F2>INCLUDES COSTS OF PROGRAMMING.
<F3>NET OF AMOUNTS CAPITALIZED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>