alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3






                          Independent Auditor's Report

The Board of Directors
The CIT Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion about The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc. and The CIT Group/Consumer Finance Inc.'s (the Companies), both
wholly-owned subsidiaries of The CIT Group, Inc., compliance with the minimum
servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2000 included in the accompanying management assertion.
Management is responsible for the Companies' compliance with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Companies' compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companies' compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Companies' compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Companies have complied in all
material respects with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material aspects.


/s/ KPMG LLP
--------------------------
KPMG LLP

March 1, 2001
EXHIBIT 10(R-5)


     On December 15, 2008, the Board of Directors of EMCOR Group, Inc.
determined that the Incentive Plan for Senior Executive Officers (the "Plan")
would be suspended so that no phantom stock units would be issued thereunder in
respect of incentive awards made for calendar years 2008 and 2009 and, unless it
otherwise determines, in respect of incentive awards made for ensuing years.
Phantom stock units outstanding under the Plan as of December 15, 2008, which
are those issued in respect of incentive awards made for calendar years 2006 and
2007, remain outstanding and are to be paid in accordance with the terms of the
Plan.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Vignette Corporation (the Company) hereby certify that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

March 10, 2009



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL A.
AVILES                               
|Michael A. Aviles President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                                       
|/s/    T. PATRICK
KELLY                                
|T. Patrick Kelly Chief Financial Officer
eFleets Corporation


7660 Pebble Drive


Fort Worth, Texas 76118


 


 


April 4, 2014


 


Zeus Corp


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to
the Secured Convertible Promissory Note (“Note”) of Good Energy Conservation, Inc.(the “Company”) dated
April 1, 2012 in the original amount of $750,000 which has been issued to Zeus Corp (“Holder”):


 


For good and valuable
consideration the receipt of which is hereby received, the Company and the Holder hereby agree that the maturity date of the Note
shall be extended from March 31, 2014 to March 31, 2015 and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the respective Notes all
interest and principal due on the Notes shall be deferred and payable on the new maturity date of the Note. As consideration and
inducement to the Holder to agree to the renewal and extension of the Note and accrued interest, the Company has agreed to issue
warrants to Zeus to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock of eFLEETS Corporation with an exercise price of $1.26 per share (pre-split).
The warrants will be fully vested and expire on March 31, 2019, with a cashless option. This agreement is effective April 1, 2014.


 


Except as set forth
herein, all other terms set forth in the Notes shall remain unchanged. This extension agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Texas, excluding its conflict of laws rules. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the any legal action instituted
by any party to this extension shall be the Circuit Court of Tarrant County, Texas.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours, 
	 	 	 
	 	GOOD EARTH ENERGY CONSERVATION, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	           	 
	 	 	James R. Emmons
	 	 	President


Agreed and Accepted


 


Zeus Corp


 


	By:	 	 
	 	Name: 
	 	Title:
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATIONS



I, William Tay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Skytrip Holdings, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 19, 2007



/s/ William Tay

William Tay, President and CEO

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     53,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,231
<PP&E>                                          12,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,241
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,603
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           44,693
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,603
<SALES>                                         48,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,647
<CGS>                                           15,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,028
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (4)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (689)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   6,649
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,766)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (7.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.13)



</TABLE>
Case 2:09-cv-10436-JAC-MKM Document 5 Filed 03/26/2009 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10436-JAC-MKM Document 5 Filed 03/26/2009 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10436-JAC-MKM Document 5 Filed 03/26/2009 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Pervasive Software Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending
June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Pervasive Software Inc.

By:

/s/ David SikoraName: David Sikora Title: Chief Executive Officer


By:

/s/ John E. FarrName: John E. Farr Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### Raymond Gilbert PENDLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48949.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 28, 1994.

*852Gary E. Brotherton, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the dismissal of a Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Kenneth D. GRIFFIN, Appellant v. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Appellee.

No. 04-95-00904-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

Aug. 7, 1996.

Robert L. Busselman, Kenedy, for appellant.

*649John B. Worley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Child Support Div., Austin, for appellee.

Before CHAPA, C.J., and HARDBERGER and GREEN, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The appellee, the Office of the Attorney General, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for failure to correct a defect in the perfecting document as well as an alternative motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. On July 9, 1996, we held these motions in abeyance and ordered the appellant, Kenneth D. Griffin, to correct the defect. Griffin did not respond. Accordingly, we grant the appel-lee’s motions to dismiss.

The appeal was due to be perfected by November 6, 1995. On November 5, 1995, Griffin filed a notice of appeal. As we indicated in our December 21, 1995 show cause order, Griffin should have filed a cost bond, a cash deposit, or an affidavit of indigency. Tex.R.App. P. 40(a)(1); *see also In re Hall,*871 S.W.2d 251, 252 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1994, no writ); Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 109.002(a) (Vernon 1996). Nonetheless, we found that Griffin had filed his timely notice of appeal in a bona fide attempt to perfect his appeal. *Griffin v. Office of the Attorney General,*919 S.W.2d 170, 170 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1996, order) (citing *Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.,*813 S.W.2d 499, 499 (Tex.1991)). We concluded that our jurisdiction had been properly invoked, but we expressed no opinion as to the adequacy of Griffin’s notice of appeal should the appellee choose to enforce its right to a cost bond. *Id.*at 171 & n. 1.

As appellee noted in its motions to dismiss, Griffin has known about the defect in his perfecting document since December 21, 1995. He has not responded to the appel-lee’s motions nor has he filed a cost bond or substitute security as required by our order of July 9, 1996. The failure to comply with a court order is grounds for dismissal. Tex. R.App. P. 60(a)(1).

The appeal is dismissed.
Amyris 2013 10-K Ex 10.32 AmendmentToOct4TotalLetterAgreement12-01-13FINAL




TOTAL ENERGIES NOUVELLES ACTIVITES USA
24 Cours Michelet
92800 Puteaux
France




December 1, 2013




Amyris, Inc. 
5885 Hollis Street, Suite 100 
Emeryville, CA 94608 
Attention: Mr. John Melo, President & CEO 


Reference is made to that certain Letter Agreement by and between Amyris and Total, dated as of October 4, 2013, (the “Letter Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given such terms in the Letter Agreement.  Amyris and Total hereby agree that all references to December 2, 2013 in the Letter Agreement are hereby amended and restated to refer to December 3, 2013.


Except as specifically modified hereby, all terms and conditions of the Notes shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  This letter shall not be a waiver of any existing default or breach of a covenant unless specified herein.  This letter agreement shall be deemed to from an integral part of each of the Notes.  In the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the provisions of the Notes and this letter agreement, the provisions of this letter agreement will prevail and govern.  All references to the “Note” in the Notes shall hereinafter refer to the each such Note as amended by this letter agreement.


Very truly yours,


TOTAL ENERGIES NOUVELLES ACTIVITES USA


By: /s/____________
Name:  Bernard CLEMENT
Title: 




Agreed to and accepted as of
the date first written above:


AMYRIS, INC.




By:  /s/_______________
       Name: JOHN MELO
         Title:  President & CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1209 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1209

   To allow for additional flights beyond the perimeter restriction 
        applicable to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2009

Mr. Ensign (for himself, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Specter, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Kyl, 
 Mr. McCain, and Mr. DeMint) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow for additional flights beyond the perimeter restriction 
        applicable to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENDING THE LENGTH OF FLIGHTS FROM RONALD REAGAN 
              WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT.

    Section 41718 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Use of Airport Slots for Beyond Perimeter Flights.--
Notwithstanding section 49109 or any other provision of law, any air 
carrier that holds or operates air carrier slots at Ronald Reagan 
Washington National Airport as of January 1, 2009, pursuant to subparts 
K and S of part 93 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, which are 
being used as of that date for scheduled service between that airport 
and a large hub airport (as defined in section 40102(a)(29)), may use 
such slots for service between Ronald Reagan Washington National 
Airport and any airport located outside of the perimeter restriction 
described in section 49109.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32643-32644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16034]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Commodity Credit Corporation

7 CFR Part 1439 and 1475


Redesignation of Emergency Livestock Assistance Regulations

AGENCY: Commodity Credit Corporation, USDA.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This final rule redesignates the Emergency Livestock 
Assistance Regulations from part 1475 to part 1439 as part of an 
overall agency effort to reorganize chapter XIV of this title.


[[Page 32644]]


EFFECTIVE DATE: June 25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leona Dittus, Director, Emergency and 
Noninsured Assistance Program Division, FSA, USDA, AG Box 0526, P.O. 
Box 2415, Washington, D.C. 20013-2415, Telephone (202) 720-3168.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    This rule redesignates the Emergency Livestock Assistance 
Regulations from Part 1475 to Part 1439 as part of an overall agency 
effort to combine and unify CCC regulations into easily identifiable 
parts. No changes in the text are being made.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 1439 and 1475

    Eligibility requirements, emergency assistance, and reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.
    Accordingly, under the authority 7 U.S.C. 1427 and 1471 (i)-(j) and 
15 U.S.C. 714(b) and 714(c), 7 CFR part 1475 is redesignated as 7 CFR 
part 1439 and all internal references to part 1475 are revised to 
reflect new part 1439 designations.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. on June 17, 1996.
Bruce R. Weber,
Acting Executive Vice President, Commodity Credit Corporation.
[FR Doc. 96-16034 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 3410-05-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2023. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 30, 2023 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0076. KRISTOPHER ALLEN et al v. STEVE HARRIS.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 20105756
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

#### **SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

#### ** **

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any otherpurpose.

 

The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Behringer Harvard Opportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”),each hereby certify as follows:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”),which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this 15th day of May, 2008.

 
|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | /s/  Robert M. Behringer |
|   | Robert  M. Behringer     |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/  Gary S. Bresky      |
|   | Gary  S. Bresky          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will beretained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James CODY, Jr., Appellant. James CODY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 47945.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 2, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a felony conviction for stealing, and the trial court’s denial of a *759Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.16(b).

Judgments Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp. III
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 (the
“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Michael Kaswan, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Michael Kaswan
              Dated:
      May 8, 2009Michael
      KaswanChief
      Operating Officer(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SUSAN L. KATZ,

 Respondent

 v.

JAMES R. KATZ,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 462 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.