36286 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 10, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

of the earth are published in paragraph

6005 of FAA Order 7400.9C dated

August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class E airspace designation

listed in this document will be

published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) establishes Class E airspace at

Sturgis, SD to accommodate aircraft

executing the GPS Runway 29 SIAP at

Sturgis Municipal Airport. Controlled

airspace extending upward from 700

feet AGL is needed to contain aircraft

executing the approach. The area will be

depicted on appropriate aeronautical

charts thereby enabling pilots to

circumnavigate the area or otherwise

comply with IFR procedures.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. Therefore, this regulation—(1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AGL SD E5 Sturgis, SD [New]

Sturgis Municipal Airport, SD

(lat. 44°26′06′′ N, long. 103°22′38′′ W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius

of the Sturgis Municipal Airport.

* * * * *

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on June 20,

1986.

Maureen Woods,

Manager, Air Traffic Division.

[FR Doc. 96–17591 Filed 7–9–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 93–AWP–4]

Alteration of Jet Routes J–86 and J–92;

Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final

rule published in the Federal Register

on June 13, 1996 (Airspace Docket No.

93–AWP–4). In the airspace designation

of Jet Route 86 (J–86), effective August

15, 1996, erroneously showed ‘‘Miami,

FL’’ as the ending point for J–86. This

action corrects the definition of J–86 by

changing the ending point to read

‘‘Dolphin, FL.’’

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15,

1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill

Nelson, Airspace and Rules Division,

ATA–400, Office of Air Traffic Airspace

Management, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone: (202) 267–8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal

Register Document 96–15062, Airspace

Docket No. 93–AWP–4, published on

June 13, 1996 (61 FR 29938), extended

J–86 and realigned J–92 to enhance

traffic flows and reduce controller

workload. However, in the June 13

publication the description for J–86

erroneously indicated Miami, FL as the

ending point for J–86. This action

corrects that error.

Correction of Final Rule

§ 71.1 [Corrected]

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, the airspace

designation for J–86, published in the

Federal Register on June 13, 1996 (61

FR 29939); Federal Register Document

96–15062, Column 1) is corrected to

read as follows:

* * * * *

J–86 [Revised]

From Beatty, NV; INT Beatty 131° and

Boulder City, NV, 284° radials; Boulder City;

Peach Springs, AZ; Winslow, AZ; El Paso,

TX; Fort Stockton, TX; Junction, TX; Austin,

TX; Humble, TX; Leeville, LA; INT Leeville

104° and Sarasota, FL, 286° radials; Sarasota;

INT Sarasota 103° and La Belle, FL, 313°

radials; La Belle; to Dolphin, FL.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28,

1996.

Nancy B. Kalinowski,

Acting Program Director for Air Traffic

Airspace Management.

[FR Doc. 96–17230 Filed 7–9–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

14 CFR Part 91

Delegation of Authority

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of delegation of

authority.

SUMMARY: The Administrator of the FAA

is delegating the authority to administer

certain provisions of Special Aviation

Regulation (SFAR) No. 74—Airspace

and Flight Operations Requirements for

the 1996 Summer Olympic Games,

Atlanta, GA, to the Regional

Administrator for the Southern Region.

This delegation will enable the FAA to

respond to the immediate needs of the

Olympic Committee, local and Federal

law enforcement officials and other

safety personnel during the Olympic

Games.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 10, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steve Alogna, Olympic Project Manager,

Federal Aviation Administration, 1701

Columbia Ave., College Park, Georgia

30337; (404) 305–5051.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

February 12, 1996, the FAA published

SFAR No. 74 in the Federal Register (61

FR 5492), which establishes airspace

and flight operations requirements for

the XXVI Olympic Games. This

regulation is to provide for security of

the venues, safe operations, and

efficient management of air traffic to,

within, and from these areas, and to

prevent an unsafe congestion of

sightseeing and other aircraft over the

various games sites. Paragraph A.3 of

SFAR No. 74 contains provisions to

provide flexible and efficient

management and control of air traffic,

such as the authority to give priority to

or exclude from certain requirements of