alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 386

To provide that professional baseball teams and leagues composed of such

teams shall be subject to the antitrust laws.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that professional baseball teams and leagues composed of such teams shall be subject to the antitrust

laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Professional Baseball

5 Antitrust Reform Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds that—

8 (1) the business of organized professional base9 ball is in, or affects, interstate commerce, and
2

HR 386 IH

1 (2) the antitrust laws should be amended to re2 verse the result of the decisions of the Supreme

3 Court of the United States in Federal Baseball Club

4 v. National League, 259 U.S. 200 (1922), Toolson

5 v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 (1953),

6 and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972), which ex7 empted baseball from coverage under the antitrust

8 laws.

9 SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO PROFES10 SIONAL BASEBALL.

11 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

12 by adding at the end the following section:

13 ‘‘SEC. 27. Except as provided in Public Law 87–331

14 (15 U.S.C. 291 et seq.) (commonly known as the Sports

15 Broadcasting Act of 1961), the antitrust laws shall apply

16 to the business of organized professional baseball.’’.

17 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

18 This Act and the amendments made by this Act

19 shall—

20 (1) take effect 1 year after the date of the en21 actment of this Act,

22 (2) apply to conduct that occurs and any agree23 ment in effect after such effective date, and
3

HR 386 IH

1 (3) not apply to conduct that occurred before

2 such effective date.

Æ
<PAGE>


                             EXHIBIT 23

                   Independent Auditors' Consent

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 333-42079, 333-48197 and 333-87879 of Power-One, Inc. on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement No. 333-48184 of Power-One, Inc. on Form S-3 of our
report dated January 19, 2001 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Power-One, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 26, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 28.1

                      [Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. Logo]

Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
Wilmington, DE

March 15, 2000



Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized Automobile
Financing Receivables

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. is responsible for establishing
and maintaining an effective system of internal control over servicing of
securitized automobile financing receivables, which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper servicing of securitized automobile
financing receivables. The system contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and
actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal
control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the
effectiveness of an internal control system may vary over time.

Management of The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. assessed its system of internal
control over servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables as of
December 31, 1999 in relation to criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 1999, the Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables.

                                            /s/ Keith Schuck
                                            -------------------------
                                            Keith Schuck
                                            Vice President
                                            Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 81-15    Filed 01/06/11   Page 1 of 3

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 81-15    Filed 01/06/11   Page 2 of 3

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM   Document 81-15    Filed 01/06/11   Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTHWEST CHARIOTS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Doolan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2008

By: */s/ Robert Doolan*

Robert Doolan

Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Evolution Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| |                                             
| | /s/ Dennis McLaughlin                       
| | Dennis McLaughlin                           
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer and President

September 21, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DERRICK R. MALLORY, 

Plaintiff,

Civil No.09-10866

Hon. John Feikens 

v.

NOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC., et al

Defendant. 

________________________________/

JUDGMENT

The Court has duly reviewed the issues and rendered a decision in this action; 

It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the

Complaint seeking to set aside a home foreclosure are GRANTED, pursuant to the RookerFeldman doctrine and res judicata. 

s/John Feikens 

John Feikens

United States District Judge

Dated: October 20, 2009

2:09-cv-10866-JF-DAS Doc # 23 Filed 10/20/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 502
2

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of record

by electronic means or U.S. Mail on October 20,

2009.

s/Carol Cohron 

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10866-JF-DAS Doc # 23 Filed 10/20/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 503
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Oleg Bilinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| 





|July 21, 2008 | By: /s/Oleg Bilinski                 
|------------- | -------------------------------------
|              | Oleg Bilinski                        
|              | President and Chief Executive Officer

---
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lucky Strike
Explorations Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Michael Noble, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 12, 2008              By: /s/ Michael Noble
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael Noble
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BAE Industries, Incorporated,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:08−cv−14497−AC−DAS

Hon. Avern Cohn

Whitesell Corporation, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE TO APPEAR

 You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable Avern Cohn, Theodore Levin U.S.

Courthouse, 231 West Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan, for the following proceeding(s):

• STATUS CONFERENCE: February 24, 2009 at 02:00 PM

Certification

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

By: s/ J. Owens 

Case Manager

Dated: December 8, 2008

2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 18 Filed 12/08/08 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 380
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeuLion, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (section) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (section) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his or her knowledge:




(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Nancy LiName:
Nancy LiTitle:
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
August 11, 2011






/s/ Arthur J. McCarthyName:
Arthur J. McCarthyTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting

Officer)Date:
August 11, 2011
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KIWANII EDWARD MOSLEY, Ghost , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:11

- cr - 00058

- RAJ

- FBS

- 3 ; 2:20

- cv - 00130

- RAJ )

Submitted : July 22, 2021 Decided: August 10, 2021

Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kiwanii Edward Mosley , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kiwanii Edward Mosley seeks to appea l the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district cour t’s assessment of the constitutional claims d ebatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is de batable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Mosley ’s informal brief , we conclude that Mosley has not made the requisite showing. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ( “ The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules , our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief. ” )

. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny as moot Mosley’s motion seeking permission to file a motion for compassionate release with the district court, and dismiss the appeal.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S. (the "Company")
on Form  20-F/A  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, SOREN
DEGN, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         A signed  original of this written  statement  has been provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  January 9, 2006                            /s/ SOREN DEGN
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Soren Degn
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.111   Filed 12/08/08   Page 1 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.112   Filed 12/08/08   Page 2 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.113   Filed 12/08/08   Page 3 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.114   Filed 12/08/08   Page 4 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.115   Filed 12/08/08   Page 5 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.116   Filed 12/08/08   Page 6 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.117   Filed 12/08/08   Page 7 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.118   Filed 12/08/08   Page 8 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.119   Filed 12/08/08   Page 9 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.120   Filed 12/08/08   Page 10 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.121   Filed 12/08/08   Page 11 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.122   Filed 12/08/08   Page 12 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.123   Filed 12/08/08   Page 13 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.124   Filed 12/08/08   Page 14 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.125   Filed 12/08/08   Page 15 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.126   Filed 12/08/08   Page 16 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.127   Filed 12/08/08   Page 17 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.128   Filed 12/08/08   Page 18 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.129   Filed 12/08/08   Page 19 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.130   Filed 12/08/08   Page 20 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.131   Filed 12/08/08   Page 21 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.132   Filed 12/08/08   Page 22 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.133   Filed 12/08/08   Page 23 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.134   Filed 12/08/08   Page 24 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.135   Filed 12/08/08   Page 25 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.136   Filed 12/08/08   Page 26 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.137   Filed 12/08/08   Page 27 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.138   Filed 12/08/08   Page 28 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.139   Filed 12/08/08   Page 29 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.140   Filed 12/08/08   Page 30 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.141   Filed 12/08/08   Page 31 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.142   Filed 12/08/08   Page 32 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.143   Filed 12/08/08   Page 33 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.144   Filed 12/08/08   Page 34 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.145   Filed 12/08/08   Page 35 of 36

Case 2:08-cv-15075-PDB-SDP   ECF No. 1-5, PageID.146   Filed 12/08/08   Page 36 of 36
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50660 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. SANDRA LUZ ALVAREZ-DE GORDILS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2384-ALL Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Sandra Luz Alvarez-De Gordils raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 3, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10280

2 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3638

To reauthorize the Development Fund for Africa under chapter 10 of part

I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. BEREUTER (for himself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr.

PAYNE of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To reauthorize the Development Fund for Africa under

chapter 10 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT FUND

4 FOR AFRICA.

5 Section 497 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

6 (22 U.S.C. 2294) is amended—

7 (1) by inserting after the section heading the

8 following:

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be ap10 propriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out
2

•HR 3638 IH

1 this chapter for fiscal year 1997 and each subsequent fis2 cal year.’’; and

3 (2) by striking ‘‘Funds appropriated’’ and in4 serting the following:

5 ‘‘(b) AVAILABILITY.—Funds appropriated’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1.       Liberty Acquisition Corporation, a Tennessee corporation and wholly
         owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

2.       Special Omega Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and
         wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

3.       Pentegra Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
         subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

4.       Edge Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and wholly
         owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

5.       TW Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and wholly
         owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.