Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 130 / Friday, July 5, 1996 / Notices 35199

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–17073 Filed 7–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER96–998–001]

Cenerprise, Inc.; Notice of Filing

June 28, 1996.

Take notice that on June 19, 1996,

Cenerprise, Inc. (Cenerprise), corporate

successor to Cenergy, Inc. (Cenergy),

filed an amendment to its application in

Docket No. ER96–998–000 filed

pursaunt to Section 205 of the Federal

Power Act, Part 35 of the Commission’s

Regulations, and the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure, for an

order approving certain changes to

Cenerprise’s Rate Schedule FERC No. 1

and changes to its Standards of

Conduct.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

July 10, 1996. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–17074 Filed 7–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER96–1471–000]

Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company; Notice of Filing

June 28, 1996.

Take notice that on June 6, 1996,

Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company tendered for filing an

amendment to its June 1, 1996, filing in

the above-referenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

July 10, 1996. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–17075 Filed 7–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP96–594–000]

El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice

of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

June 28, 1996.

Take notice that on June 25, 1996, El

Paso Natural Gas Company (El Paso),

P.O. Box 1492, El Paso, Texas 79978,

filed in Docket No. CP96–94–000 a

request pursuant to Sections 157.205

and 157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.212) for

authorization to operate three existing

metering facilities located in San Juan

County, New Mexico, as jurisdictional

delivery points for delivery of natural

gas under El Paso’s blanket certificate

issued in Docket Nos. CP82–435–000

pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas

Act, all as more fully set forth in the

request that is on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

El Paso states that it installed two

metering facilities in connection with

the construction and installation of

various procession and treating facilities

at the Blanco Plant and one metering

facility in connection with the pigging

facilities on El Paso’s 16’’ O.D. BlancoFruitland Line (Line No. 3200) to

facilitate the delivery of pipeline quality

gas to those facilities for use as fuel. El

Paso further states that the Blanco Plant

processing and treating facilities and

Line No. 3200 have been abandoned by

El Paso and are now owned by a

different non-regulated entity; however,

a need for pipeline quality gas as fuel at

these facilities still remains. El Paso

states that in order to facilitate the

delivery of gas for fuel, El Paso now

seeks authorization to utilize the three

existing metering facilities as

jurisdictional delivery points under a

transportation arrangement and to

charge its tariff rates for any deliveries

of gas to such points.

El Paso states that pursuant to the

spin-down of production-area facilities

by El Paso to El Paso Field Services

Company (Field Services) as described

in El Paso’s application at Docket Nos.

CP94–183–000 and 001, Field Services

acquired, among other things, the

Blanco Plant processing and treating

facilities and Line No. 3200. El Paso has

been informed that Field Services will

continue to need pipeline quality gas to

be utilized as fuel at the transferred

facilities.

El Paso states that the operation of the

proposed delivery points at the Blanco

Plant processing and treating facilities

and the pigging operations on Line No.

3200 is not prohibited by El Paso’s

existing Volume No. 1–A Tariff. El Paso

further states that it will provide

interruptible transportation service to

the proposed delivery points pursuant

to an effective Transportation Service

Agreement (TSA) between El Paso and

El Paso Gas Marketing Company. In

addition, El Paso states that it has

sufficient capacity to accomplish the

deliveries specified under the TSA

without detriment or disadvantage to El

Paso’s other customers.

El Paso states that the volumes of

natural gas to be transported through the

proposed delivery points are:

(a) Blanco Plant Miscellaneous

Operating Fuel No. 1—15.63 Mcf per

day for an average day;

(b) Blanco Miscellaneous Operating

Fuel No. 2—5.30 Mcf per day for an

average day during those months when

in use; and

(c) Dry Gas to Pig 16′′ Wet Line—

1,112 Mcf per day based on a peak day

with approximately 2 flow hours total

(only used when pigging of Line No.

3200 is necessary).

El Paso believes the delivery of gas

through the existing metering facilities

will have a negligible effect upon El

Paso’s peak day and annual deliveries

based on its 1995 peak day

transportation of 3,224,879 Mcf and a

total annual transportation of

872,056,118 Mcf.

The request also states that El Paso’s

environmental analysis supports the

conclusion that the operation of the

existing metering facilities as

jurisdictional delivery points will not be

a major Federal action significantly

affecting the human environment.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section