alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT21.0**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES**

 

United States of America

 

•                                          Trans World Gaming International U.S. Corp.

 

•                                          Trans World Gaming of Louisiana, Inc.

 

Czech Republic

 

•                                          21st Century Resorts a.s.

 

•                                          American Chance Casinos a.s. (formerly LMJ Casino Rozvadova.s.)

 

•                                          Atlantic Properties, s.r.o.

 

•                                          Hollywood Spin s.r.o.

 

•                                          LMJ Slots s.r.o.

 

•                                          SC98A, s.r.o.

 

•                                          Trans World Hotels, s.r.o.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 368 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 368

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar 
carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
                  certain radiation-exposed veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar 
carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
                  certain radiation-exposed veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT BRONCHIOLO-ALVEOLAR CARCINOMA IS SERVICE-
              CONNECTED.

    Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(P) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

 SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL NO. 08-14136

ADAM A. SHAKOOR,

Plaintiff(s),

-vWARREN EVANS, ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER SETTING ASIDE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said court, held in the

 United States Courthouse, in the City of

 Detroit, State of Michigan, on December 5, 2008.

 

 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This Court having issued an Order to Show Cause for lack of progress and the 

Plaintiff having requested and obtained a Clerk’s Entry of Default , therefore;

IT IS ORDERED that the Court's Order to Show Cause as to

why this case should not be dismissed for lack of progress be and the same is hereby SET

ASIDE.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: December 5, 2008

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 5, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7321
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM R. TALLEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-530, CA-01-2420-6-13) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William R. Talley, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William R. Talley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Talley has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Talley , Nos. CR99-530; CA-01-2420-6-13 (D.S.C. filed July 25, 2002 & entered July 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01542

- CV

RACHAEL STOKES , Appellant
V. CLARK W. STEFFENS, D .D.S. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- 04728



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright, and Justices Lang

- Miers and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown

The clerk’s record in this case is ov erdue. By letter dated December 4, 2013, we

informed appellant that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not

been filed because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record.

We directed ap pellant to file written verification that she had paid for or made arrangements to

pay for the clerk’s record or that she had been found entitled to proceed without payment of

costs. We cautioned appellant that if she did not file the required documentati on within ten days,

we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the

required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the

clerk’s record.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b)

.

131542F.P05 /Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN
JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

RACHAEL STOKES, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 01542

- CV V.

CLARK W. STEFFENS, D.D.S., Appellee On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 13

- 04728. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang

- Miers participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee CLARK W. STEFFENS, D.D.S. recover his costs of this appeal from appellant RACHAEL STOKES.

Judgment entered this 27th day of February, 2014.

/Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN
JUSTICE
Order entered November 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00263-CR

CLEAVEN WADE III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-83322-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Indu Bailey’s November 18, 2019 request for 

additional time to file the reporter’s record. When appellant’s retained counsel finally informed 

the Court he had paid or made arrangements to pay for the record, we ordered the reporter’s 

record filed by September 20, 2019. On September 10, 2019, we received a letter from Ms. 

Bailey informing the Court that she was working on this record but would not be able to file it 

before she left on vacation beginning September 19 until November 11, 2019. We then ordered 

the reporter’s record filed by November 22, 2019. On November 18, 2019, Ms. Bailey filed 

another request for extension of time. 

We GRANT this final extension of time to file the reporter’s record and ORDER the 

reporter’s record filed by 5:00 p.m. on December 13, 2019. If the reporter’s record is not filed 
by that time, Ms. Bailey will be ordered, without further notice, not to sit until the complete 

reporter’s record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jennifer Edgeworth, 

Presiding Judge, 219th Judicial District Court; Indu Bailey, official court reporter, 219th Judicial 

District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

 

Interwoven, Inc. has the following subsidiaries: 

 

Interwoven UK Ltd. 

 

Interwoven Australia Pty. Ltd. 

 

Interwoven Software Pte. Ltd. 

 

Interwoven Hong Kong Ltd. 

 

Interwoven GmbH 

 

Interwoven Italy 

 

Interwoven Japan KK 

 

Interwoven BV 

 

Interwoven Canada Ltd. 

 

Interwoven SAS 

 

Interwoven Korea Inc. 

 

Interwoven AB 

 

Interwoven Software SL 

 

Interwoven Srl 

 

iManage, Inc. 

 

iManage Limited 

 

iManage B.V. 

 

iManage GmbH 

 

iManage SARL 

 

Component Insights India Private Limited
----

| (1)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-120350) of Equity One,  Inc., |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-150707) of Equity One,  Inc., |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (3)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-106909) of Equity One,  Inc., |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-99577) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option      Plan and the Amended and Restated 2000 Executive Incentive Compensation      Plan of Equity One, Inc., |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (5)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103368) pertaining to the 1989 Stock Option      Plan of Equity One, Inc. and the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan of IRT      Property Company, |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (6)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-118347) pertaining to the Amended and Restated      Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Equity One,  Inc., |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (7)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-150706) pertaining to the First Amended and      Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 28, 2006, by and between      Equity One, Inc. and Jeffrey S. Olson and the Amended and Restated 2000      Executive Incentive Compensation Plan of Equity One,  Inc., |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This financial data schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheets of ITC DeltaCom, Inc. and Subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of operations for
the year ended December 31, 1999. This information, in thousands, is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         248,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,524
<INVENTORY>                                      5,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,681
<PP&E>                                         486,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 807,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,768
<BONDS>                                        516,156
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         15
<COMMON>                                           595
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   807,598
<SALES>                                        244,844
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,844
<CGS>                                          118,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               269,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,247
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (54,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        94
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (54,979)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (54,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.98)


</TABLE>
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of CTI Industries Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard W. Schwan, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                      

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    

|Date: May 9, 2005 | By: | /s/ Howard W. Schwan
|----------------- | --- | --------------------
|                  |    
|                  |     | President           
|                  |     |                     

|
|
Exhibit 10.3
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANK
NONQUALIFIED SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
 Preamble
     ARTICLE I  Definitions




---



##### 



th
    Change in the ownership of the Company or the Bank .
 -2-




---



##### 



Change in the effective control of the Company or the Bank
 Change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Companys assets or the Banks
assets
 -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE II  Calculation and Payment of Supplemental Retirement Benefit
 Amount of Supplemental Retirement Benefit
 Form and Time of Payment of Supplemental Retirement Benefit
 -5-




---



##### 



Participants Election of Method and Time of Payment
     Participants Option to Change Payment
 -6-




---



##### 



Aggregate Benefit Limitation
 Banks Right to Delay Scheduled Payment
 -7-




---



##### 



Acceleration of Payment For Participants Taxes
   ARTICLE III  Designation of Participants Entitled to Benefits;  Forfeiture of Benefits
 Designation of Participants Entitled to Benefits
 -8-




---



##### 



Forfeitures of Benefits
    ARTICLE IV  Plan Administration
 Duties and Obligations of Committee
 Eligibility and Benefit Determination
 -9-




---



##### 



ARTICLE V  Funding
 Unfunded Plan
 Optional Funding
 Investments
 ARTICLE VI  General
 Expenses
 Prohibition Against Assignment of Benefits
 -10-




---



##### 



No Liability for Actions Taken In Good Faith
 No Contract of Employment
 No Trust or Fiduciary Relationship Created
 -11-




---



##### 



Incompetency of a Participant or Beneficiary
 Applicable Law and Construction
 Severability
 -12-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII  Amendment and Termination
 Amendment
 Termination
   -13-




---



##### 



-14-




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANKDecember 17, 2008
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ William WagnerDate
    
    
    
    
    
    William Wagner, President andChief Executive Officer
 -15-
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 386 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 386

  To provide that professional baseball teams and leagues composed of 
           such teams shall be subject to the antitrust laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that professional baseball teams and leagues composed of 
           such teams shall be subject to the antitrust laws.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Professional Baseball Antitrust 
Reform Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    The Congress finds that--
            (1) the business of organized professional baseball is in, 
        or affects, interstate commerce, and
            (2) the antitrust laws should be amended to reverse the 
        result of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United 
        States in Federal Baseball Club v. National League, 259 U.S. 
        200 (1922), Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356 
        (1953), and Flood v. Kuhn, 407 U.S. 258 (1972), which exempted 
        baseball from coverage under the antitrust laws.

SEC. 3. APPLICATION OF ANTITRUST LAWS TO PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL.

    The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended by adding at the 
end the following section:
    ``Sec. 27. Except as provided in Public Law 87-331 (15 U.S.C. 291 
et seq.) (commonly known as the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961), the 
antitrust laws shall apply to the business of organized professional 
baseball.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall--
            (1) take effect 1 year after the date of the enactment of 
        this Act,
            (2) apply to conduct that occurs and any agreement in 
        effect after such effective date, and
            (3) not apply to conduct that occurred before such 
        effective date.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

JANELLE REEVES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 09-10594 

V 

 Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

BCBG MAXAZRIA GROUP, INC. 

 Defendant. 

__________________________/ 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

At a session of the court 

Held this : August 11, 2009 

PRESENT: THE HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

 The parties having resolved this matter. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

 This resolves the last pending issue in this case and CLOSES this case file. 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: August 11, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

on August 11, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

 

 

Approved: 

/s/ Richard A. Meier /s/ Marlo Johnson Roebuck 

Attorney for the Plaintiff Attorney for the Defendant 

2:09-cv-10594-PJD-MJH Doc # 9 Filed 08/11/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 30
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
Ying He, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  November
      5, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/ Ying HeYing
      HeChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 139 Filed 03/18/15 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 7555