alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results
of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL J. CULOTTA                                            
|Michael J. Culotta                                                   
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer October 29, 2009
#### PV INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and R.W. Forsythe, Petitioners, v. Malcolm TURNER, Respondent.

No. C-8529.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 4, 1989.

PER CURIAM.

In this action for fraud, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties, and alienation of affections, the trial court admitted evidence obtained by petitioner, R.W. For-sythe, by a wiretapping device which For-sythe hooked up to his residential tele*866phone. He recorded several conversations between his wife, Barbara Forsythe, and respondent, Malcolm Turner. The court of appeals held that the tape recorded telephone conversations between Barbara For-sythe and Malcolm Turner constituted an illegal wiretap under 18 U.S.C. § 2515 and that admission of these tapes into evidence was reversible error. Accordingly, the court of appeals reversed and remanded to the trial court for a new trial. 765 S.W.2d 455.

The court of appeals declined to follow *Simpson v. Simpson,*490 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*419 U.S. 897, 95 S.Ct. 176, 42 L.Ed.2d 141 (1974), which is factually analogous to the instant case. The court in *Simpson*held that § 2515 is “not sufficiently definite and specific to create a federal cause of action” for a former husband’s use of a wiretapping device to intercept wife’s conversations in their marital home. *Id.*at 810.

In denying the application for writ of error, we are not to be construed as approving or disapproving the holding of the court of appeals on the admissibility of the tape recorded telephone conversations.

The application for writ of error is denied.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Theodore S. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

No. WD 49169.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 29, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 21, 1995.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Williams appeals from his conviction for tampering, § 569.080, RSMol994, for which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to a term of fifteen years imprisonment. Williams presents two points in this appeal claiming: (1) that the evidence was insufficient in that it did not establish that he knowingly possessed a 1988 Buick without the consent of its owner; and (2) that the trial court erred in allowing a witness to testify that she thought Williams had stolen some merchandise from her store because such evidence is evidence of an uncharged crime.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No’s. 333-05873, 033-76120, 333-05959, 033-76122,333-05957, 333-18935, 333-18883, 333-18885, 333-30841, 333-30211, 333-31901,333-31895, 333-43757, 333-60365, 333-91995, 333-84751, 333-40914, 333-48116,333—60862, 333-116421, 333-116423 and 333-135446 on Forms S-8 and RegistrationStatement No’s. 033-94532, 333-09109, 333-50775, 333-50777 and 333-53351 on FormsS-3 of our reports dated February 23, 2007, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Spherion Corporation andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spherion Corporationfor the year ended December 31, 2006.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

February 23, 2007

 

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3839

To terminate the effectiveness of certain amendments to the foreign repair

station rules of the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 1996

Mr. BORSKI (for himself, Mr. MARTINI, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr.

DIAZ-BALART, Mr. QUINN, Mr. FILNER, Mr. NADLER, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr.

FOGLIETTA, Mr. FATTAH, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. NEY,

Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. METCALF, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. KING,

and Mr. FROST) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To terminate the effectiveness of certain amendments to

the foreign repair station rules of the Federal Aviation

Administration, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aircraft Repair Station

5 Safety Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3839 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN FOREIGN REPAIR STA2 TION RULES.

3 The amendments published by the Federal Aviation

4 Administration on November 22, 1988 (43 Fed. Reg.

5 47375–47376), to parts 135 and 145 of title 14, Code

6 of Federal Regulations, shall not be effective after the date

7 of the enactment of this Act.

8 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN REGULATIONS.

9 All standards set forth in regulations issued before,

10 on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act by the

11 Federal Aviation Administration that apply to a domestic

12 repair station or shop described in section 44707(a)(2) of

13 title 49, United States Code, and the personnel employed

14 by the domestic repair station or shop shall apply to a

15 foreign repair station or shop described in such section

16 and the personnel employed by the foreign repair station

17 or shop in the same manner and to the same extent as

18 such standards apply to the domestic repair station or

19 shop and the personnel employed by the domestic repair

20 station or shop.

21 SEC. 4. REVOCATION OF REPAIR STATION CERTIFICATES

22 FOR USE OF UNCERTIFIED OR SUBSTANDARD

23 PARTS.

24 Section 44707 of title 49, United States Code, is

25 amended—
3

•HR 3839 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’ before

2 ‘‘The Administrator’’; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following:

4 ‘‘(b) REVOCATION OF REPAIR STATION CERTIFI5 CATES FOR USE OF UNCERTIFIED OR SUBSTANDARD

6 PARTS.—The Administrator shall issue an order revoking

7 a certificate issued under section 44703 to a repair station

8 or shop described in subsection (a)(2) if the Administrator

9 finds that the station or shop knowingly used an

10 uncertified or substandard airframe, engine, propeller, ap11 pliance, or any other part in the repair or overhaul of an

12 aircraft.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mike Tomas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Bioheart, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |       |  |                                                                                               
|--------------------- |  | ----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |       |  |                                                                                               
|Date: August 14, 2013 |  |       |  | /s/Mike Tomas                                                                                 
|                      |  | Name: |  | Mike Tomas                                                                                    
|                      |  |       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer







---
Abatement Order filed May 15, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00015

- CV

____________ MANZOOR MEMON , Appellant

V. HAROON SHAIKH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 28636



### ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on May 10, 2013 that appellant is in bankruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on May 7, 2013
, Manzoor Memon petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern Distri ct of Texas under case number 13

- 32851 . A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in accordance with federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.
A ccordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move

the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court h as lifted or terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).
For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM
2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM   Doc # 87-4    Filed 10/14/11   Pg 1 of 2    Pg ID 1637

2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM   Doc # 87-4    Filed 10/14/11   Pg 2 of 2    Pg ID 1638
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of Mercantile Bank Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-52620, 333-91434, 333-99853 and 333-103242) and Form S-3 (Registration Nos.
333-59154, 333-103376, 333- 108929, and 333-107814) of our report dated January
22, 2004 on the 2003 consolidated financial statements of Mercantile Bank
Corporation, which report is included in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Mercantile Bank Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2003.



                                       /s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 5, 2004
2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 104   Filed 07/29/11   Pg 1 of 2    Pg ID 1301

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 104   Filed 07/29/11   Pg 2 of 2    Pg ID 1302
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                       1,982,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               42,768,777
<ALLOWANCES>                               (3,453,787)
<INVENTORY>                                 41,223,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            91,437,200
<PP&E>                                       3,461,435
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,113,636)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              96,127,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       59,022,644
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,072,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                96,127,016
<SALES>                                    117,190,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           117,190,649
<CGS>                                       61,102,418
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,712,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (199,281)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,436,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,634,450
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,546,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,087,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,087,845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.25

GRAPHIC

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 2003

EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2003

|NAME:          |  | DANA KAMMARSGARD  
|-------------- |  | ------------------
|TITLE:         |  | CTO               
|BASE SALARY:   |  | $300,000          
|ON-PLAN BONUS: |  | 50% of Base Salary

EXHIBIT C

By signing this Executive Compensation Plan 2003 ("Plan"), you hereby agree that the terms of this Plan shall be in addition to the terms of the Employment
Agreement between you and Dot Hill dated August 2, 1999 ("Employment Agreement"), and shall replace and supercede the terms of Exhibit C of the Employment Agreement with respect to your
base salary and bonus for the year 2003. Otherwise, the terms of your Employment Agreement remain unchanged. For any period of time after December 31, 2003, your base salary and bonus shall be
subject to change, as determined by Dot Hill's Board of Directors and/or Compensation Committee ("BOD").

BONUS

Bonus is calculated based on a percentage of base salary.

Bonus
will be paid once annually as soon as practicable after an audit of the Company's fiscal year 2003 results has been completed and after the Dot Hill Board of Directors and/or
Compensation Committee ("BOD") has approved the payment.

70%
of bonus potential is tied to Dot Hill's overall 2003 annual operating plan.



---



20%
of bonus potential is subjective and may be tied to individual departmental goals and performance.

10%
of bonus potential is subjective and will be based on the Company's performance with respect to management of its working capital and cash flow.

TERMS



|/s/ JIM LAMBERTJim Lambert,President/CEO |  |  |  | /s/ DANA KAMMARSGARDDana Kammarsgard,CTO
|---------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Manhattan Bancorp (the “Company”).

 

I, Dean Fletcher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                              The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                              The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such reports.

 

Dated:  May 13, 2010

 

 
|   | /s/  Dean Fletcher            |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Dean  Fletcher                |
|   | Executive  Vice President and |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

 Defendant.

 /

Case Number: 08-14561

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,

(Doc. 9), and no objections having been filed thereto,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (doc. 8), is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion

for Summary Judgment, (doc. 7), is DENIED.

s/Marianne O. Battani

U. S. District Court Judge

Dated: November 20, 2009

2:08-cv-14561-MOB-VMM Doc # 10 Filed 11/20/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 761
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon counsel of record on this date by ordinary

mail and/or electronic filing.

 s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14561-MOB-VMM Doc # 10 Filed 11/20/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 762
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2009
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: April 29, 2010
    /s/ Ricardo Figueiredo BomenyRicardo Figueiredo BomenyChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1768-DR]


Wisconsin; Amendment No. 13 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Wisconsin (FEMA-1768-DR), dated June 14, 2008, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: July 25, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective July 25, 2008.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared 
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050 Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs, 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-17690 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit # Description
A Affidavit of Mary Beth Snyder
B Affidavit of Lionel Maten
Cc Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S.__ (2008)
D Honeywell, Inc. v. Brewer Garrett Co., No. 97-3673, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS
(6th Cir. March 23, 1998)
E Morris v. Dehaan, No. 90-2190, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22135 (6th Cir.

Sept. 12, 1991)

F The Oakland Sail v. Oakland Univ. Bd. of Trustees, No. 252391, 2005 Mich.
App. LEXIS 2132 (Mich. Ct. App. Aug. 30, 2005)

G Underfer v. Univ. of Toledo, No. 00-4568, 361 Fed. Appx. 831, 2002 U.S.
App. LEXIS 10860 (6th Cir. June 5, 2002)

H Johnson-Brown v. Wayne State University, No. 98-1001, 1999 U.S. App.
LEXIS 4751 (6th Cir. Mar. 17, 1999)

I Kalai v. State of Hawaii Dept. of Human Services, No. 06-00433, 2008 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 64215 (D. Hawaii Aug. 20, 2008)

J Kuchmas v. Townson Univ., No. 06-3281, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66689 (D.

Mad. Sept. 10, 2007)

216329v1
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kallo Inc., formerly, Diamond Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Cecil, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 18th day of May, 2011.





JOHN CECILJohn CecilChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY J. BANNIGER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 359 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.