alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ecoland International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2011, I, David Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ecoland International, Inc.





Date: April 14, 2011


/s/ David WallaceDavid Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of Ecoland International, Inc.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ecoland
International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2010, I, David
Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




1.          
Such Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2010, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.          
The information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2010,
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ecoland International, Inc.




Date:
January 14,
2011


/s/ David WallaceDavid
      Wallace, Chief Financial Officer of Ecoland International,
      Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7532

BRUCE CREASY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SEWALL SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-1270-JFM)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Creasy, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Stuart Milton Nathan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Creasy v. Smith, No. CA-97-1270-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 9,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MINHAS ENERGY CONSULTANTS,  INC. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Ravinder Minhas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                      /s/ Ravinder Minhas
                                      -----------------------------------------
Date: April 15, 2008                  Ravinder Minhas
                                      Secretary Treasurer
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23

- 0454

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DANIEL DIXON BERK,

Petitioner and Appellee, and APRIL RAE BERK,

Respondent and Appellant. O R D E R

_ ________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant ’ s reply brief filed electronically on December 13, 2023, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below

-referenced Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) requires that a reply brief shall not exceed 5,000 words. Appellant ’ s certificate of compliance states that the reply brief word count does not exceed 5, 507 words

. After reviewing the Appellant ’ s reply brief filed on December 13 , 202 3 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the Rules and must be resubmitted. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified R ule and that the Appellant shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions , or deletions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 12/14/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0454in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellant and to all parties of record.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 14 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-CR-20604

RODERICK RHODES,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the court is Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer’s Report and

Recommendation recommending that the court accept Defendant Roderick Rhodes’s

guilty plea. Both the Government and Defendant have filed a “Statement of No

Intended Objection.” Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s “Report and Recommendation” [Dkt.

# 26] is ADOPTED in full and incorporated by reference. The court ACCEPTS

Defendant’s guilty plea to Counts 1 through 4, inclusive, of the indictment. The Rule 11

agreement is taken under advisement. Defendant is referred to the Probation

Department for the drafting of a pre-sentence report.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant will appear before the court for

sentencing on July 9, 2009 at 2:00 p.m.

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 13, 2009

2:08-cr-20604-RHC-DAS Doc # 34 Filed 03/13/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 197
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\08-20604.RHODES.Adopt.R&R.eew.wpd

2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, March 13, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa G. Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:08-cr-20604-RHC-DAS Doc # 34 Filed 03/13/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 198
<PAGE>   1
[KPMG LOGO]                                                         Exhibit 23.1





                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Citadel Broadcasting Company:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement No.
333-92593 filed on Form S-3 of Citadel Communications Corporation, Citadel
Broadcasting Company, CCC Capital Trust I and CCC Capital Trust II of our report
dated February 23, 2001, except as to note 19 which is as of March 14, 2001,
relating to the balance sheets of Citadel Broadcasting Company as of
December 31, 1999 and 2000, and the related statements of operations,
shareholder's equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in Form 10-K of Citadel
Broadcasting Company.


                                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP



Phoenix, Arizona
March 21, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLARD L. SLOAN, EUGENE J.

WINNINGHAM, and JAMES L. KELLEY, 

on behalf of themselves and a similarly 

situated class, Case No. 09-cv-10918

Hon. Paul D. Borman

Plaintiffs, Magistrate Mona K. Majzoub

v. Class Action

BORGWARNER, INC., BORGWARNER 

FLEXIBLE BENEFITS PLANS and

BORGWARNER DIVERSIFIED 

TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS, INC.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________________________________________/

EXHIBIT 18 

TO 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AS TO LIABILITY

2:09-cv-10918-PDB-MKM Doc # 104-3 Filed 05/14/12 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 5545
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Douglas P. Rosefsky, as Chief Financial Officer of North Atlantic Trading
Company, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 1, 2005



/s/ Douglas P. RosefskyDouglas P. RosefskyChief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

MING WEI, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 

(DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH), 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 848 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report
of RiT Technologies Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Simona Green, Vice President Finance of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)
           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and

(2)
           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2008

|By: /s/ Simona Green
Simona GreenVice President Finance |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
EXHIBIT 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgetta Mathers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:   /s/ Georgette Mathers


Georgette Mathers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Accounting Officer





Dated: August 6, 2009
Exhibit 10.1 - First Amendment CT Water Executive Employee Agreements




FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT, dated this _____ day of April 2014, is made by and between The Connecticut Water Company, a Connecticut corporation having its principal place of business in Clinton, Connecticut (“Company”), Connecticut Water Service, Inc., a Connecticut corporation and holder of all of the outstanding capital stock of Company (“Parent”), and ______________, a resident of ___________, Connecticut (“Employee”),


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Employee, Company and Parent entered into an amended and restated Employment Agreement in December 2008; and


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement in the particulars set forth below;


NOW, THEREFORE, Company, Parent and Employee agree as follows:


1.Subparagraph (g) of Paragraph 5 of the Agreement entitled “Stay-on Bonus” is hereby deleted in its entirety.


2.    Except as hereinabove modified and amended, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Parent have caused this Agreement to be executed by an authorized officer, and Employee has hereunto set Employee’s hand.


THE CONNECTICUT WATER COMPANY 
 
                        By                              
Date 
                        CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.
 
                        By                              
Date 

 
Date                        Executive
EXHIBIT 32.2  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Opencell Biomed Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   July 20, 2009 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
H.L.C.

I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 362

To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge for

the eastern district of Wisconsin, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. ROTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge for the eastern district of Wisconsin, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE FOR

4 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, by

6 and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 addi7 tional district judge for the eastern district of Wisconsin.
2

H.L.C.

•HR 362 IH

1 (b) TABLES.—In order that the table contained in

2 section 133 of title 28, United States Code, shall reflect

3 the change in the total number of permanent district

4 judgeships authorized under subsection (a), such table is

5 amended by amending the item relating to Wisconsin to

6 read as follows:

‘‘Wisconsin:

‘‘Eastern ............................................................................ 5

‘‘Western ........................................................................... 2’’.

7 SEC. 2. HOLDING OF COURT.

8 The chief judge of the eastern district of Wisconsin

9 shall designate at least 1 judge who shall hold court for

10 such district in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

Æ
EXHIBIT B


Page | of 1

Cathy Dittrich

From: Cathy Dittrich [cathy.dittrich@traverselegal.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 9:54 AM

To: ‘wdelgado@willenken.com.readnotify.com'

Ce: ‘Enrico Schaefer’

Subject: Weather Underground v. Navigation Catalyst Systems
Attachments: 01-04-10 Itr to Delgado.pdf
Please see attached.

Cathy Dittrich

Legal Assistant
Traverse Legal, PLC

TraverseLegal.com
cathy.dittrich@traverselegal.com

231-932-0411 (office)
231-932-0636 (fax)

This email contains confidential information. If you received it in error, please delete it and notify the sender.

1/5/2010


TRAVERSElegal,

ATTORNEYS & ADVISORS

January 4, 2010

VIA EMAIL ONLY

William A. Delgado

Willenken Wilson Loh & Lieb LLP
707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3850
Los Angeles, CA 90017

Re: Weather Underground v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, et.al.

Dear Will:

| received your email over the holiday weekend. | believe the Court Rules require us to
discuss “specifically” issues related to the length of discovery. | do not recall you raising any
specific issues in our telephone conference on December 15, 2009, concerning length of
discovery. My concern is that your client’s goal is merely to delay the matter as much as
possible. Please provide specific information as to why you believe it will take so long to
complete discovery. My client’s trademarks are probably not an issue, as they are
incontestable at this point. Your client’s registration of the domain names at issue is not in
contest. It appears this matter is fairly straightforward in terms of your defense, which will
rely almost exclusively on information within your control.

Ona side note, we did speak with the Court Clerk, who indicated we should commence
discovery immediately. Therefore, the discovery period has in fact started. Regardless, the
dates would begin running from the entry of the Court’s Order.

| look forward to your response. If you would like to call me directly to discuss any specific
discovery issues you have now identified, feel free to do so.

Sincerely,

TRAVERSE LEGAL, PLC

Enrico Schaefer
enrico@traverselegal.com

ES/cad
MIE 310 Order of Reference to a Magistrate JudgeRev. 3/98)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES JACKSON, ET.AL,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

DEA AGENT PATRICK CALDWELL,

ET.AL,

Defendant(s),

/

Case Number: 09-10041

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan 

Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder

AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder for the following purpose(s):

# Hearing and Determination pursuant to (28 USC 636 (b)(1)(A)) on:

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, APPLICATION TO

PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES FILED 1/6/09; AND FOR

ALL PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS

DATED: January 12, 2009 s/Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

I certify that a copy of this order was served upon James Jackson on the above date by

ordinary mail.

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10041-PJD-CEB Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 10
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-41518.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

*398Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Sergio Ruiz appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ruiz contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Ruiz maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.

In *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. *Id.*at 239-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219. Ruiz acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres,*but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review.

*Apprendi*did not overrule *Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,*530 U.S. at 489-90, 120 S.Ct. 2348; *United States v. Dabeit,*231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.2000). This court must follow *Almendarez-Torres*“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” *Dabeit,*231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Corixa Corporation:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-45375) on Form S-8 of Corixa Corporation, of our report dated April 28,
1995, relating to the statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows of Corixa Corporation (a development stage company) for the period
from September 8, 1994 (date of inception) through December 31, 1994 which 
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10K of Corixa
Corporation.




                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Seattle, Washington
March 9, 1998