alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael WASHINGTON, Appellant. Michael WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 63283, 64767.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Dec. 6, 1994.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breek K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his jury verdict based convictions of assault first degree, tampering in the first degree, receiving stolen property and armed criminal action. He also appeals denial of his post-conviction motion challenging the sentence on the assault conviction. We believe no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and that the ruling on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of facts that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. The parties have been furnished with a written státement of the reasons for affirmance.

*818Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3834 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3834

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
  To redesignate the Dunning Post Office in Chicago, Illinois, as the 
                   ``Roger P. McAuliffe Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Dunning Post Office, located at 6441 West Irving Park Road, 
Chicago, Illinois, shall be redesignated and known as the ``Roger P. 
McAuliffe Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Roger P. 
McAuliffe Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 93F-0402]


Lonza, Inc.; Withdrawal of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to a future filing, of a food additive 
petition (FAP 4B4405) proposing that the food additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of decylisononyldimethyl ammonium 
chloride as a slimicide in the manufacture of paper and paperboard 
intended to contact food.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mitchell A. Cheeseman, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-217), Food and Drug Administration, -
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3083.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of November 17, 1993 (58 FR 60665), FDA announced that a food 
additive petition (FAP 4B4405) had been filed by Lonza, Inc., c/o Delta 
Analytical Corp., 7910 Woodmont Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814 (currently c/o 
Lewis & Harrison, 122 C St. NW., suite 740, Washington, DC 20001). The 
petition proposed to amend the food additive regulations to provide for 
the safe use of decylisononyldimethyl ammonium chloride as a slimicide 
in the manufacture of paper and paperboard intended to contact food. 
Lonza, Inc., has now withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a 
future filing (21 CFR 171.7).

    Dated: June 25, 1996.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 96-17234 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 185-2 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 3662
2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 185-2 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 2 of 5 Pg ID 3663
2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 185-2 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 3 of 5 Pg ID 3664
2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 185-2 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 4 of 5 Pg ID 3665
2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 185-2 Filed 07/15/11 Pg 5 of 5 Pg ID 3666
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00502- CV The University of T exas Me dical Branch Correc tional Managed Care, Appellant
v. Brenda Alexander, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 250 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 7-0 0231 9, H ONO RAB LE SCO TT H . JENK INS, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A ND U M O PI N I O N Appellant The University of Texas Medica l Br anch Correc tional Manag ed Care has notified this Court that it no longe r wishes to pursue its a ppeal and has filed a voluntary motion to dismiss . Appellee Br enda A lexander has not objected or otherwise responded to the motion. W e grant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: De cembe r 4, 2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0162

IN THE MATTER OF:

R.C.,

Respondent and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 16, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 19 2021

07/19/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0162
EXHIBIT 31

Certifications

I,
Vahé A. Sarkissian, certify that:

Date:
March 12, 2004

|By: |  | /s/VAHÉ A. SARKISSIANVahé A. Sarkissian Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board of Directors |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

I,
Robert S. Gregg, certify that:

Date:
March 12, 2004

|By: |  | /s/ROBERT S. GREGGRobert S. Gregg Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three
month period ended March 31, 2008 of Targa Resources, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey J. McParland, as Chief Financial Officer of Targa
Resources, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2008



|       |  |                                                                              
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    JEFFREY J. MCPARLAND                                                  
|Name:  |  | Jeffrey J. McParland                                                         
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Targa Resources, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2:09-cv-10361-GER-SDP Doc # 3 Filed 02/03/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 124
2:09-cv-10361-GER-SDP Doc # 3 Filed 02/03/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 125
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROADSHIPS HOLDINGS, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael Nugent


Michael Nugent, Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 15, 2011
Attachment A

Exhibit Number

212

212a

214

214a

215

215a

216

216a

217

217a

218

220

220a

221

222

222a

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

504

505

506

507

508

509

510

511

512

513

1718

1719

1720

1721

1722

1723

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1948-2 Filed 11/08/23 Page 1 of 2
1724

1725

1726

1727

1728

1729

1730

1731

1732

1733

1735

1546

2036a

211c

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1948-2 Filed 11/08/23 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1130

ORION IP, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

in case no. 6:05-CV-322, Judge Leonard Davis.

ON MOTION

Before GAJARSA, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PROST Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Hyundai Motor America moves for a stay of execution of the monetary judgment

entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, provided

that Hyundai posts a $25 million supersedeas bond pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(0.

Orion IP, LLC responds and states that it does not oppose a stay of execution of the

judgment if Hyundai posts a $25 million bond. Hyundai replies.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. Hyundai shall post a $25 million bond within 15 business

days of the date of filing of this order.
FOR THE COURT

FEB 9 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Date FILED US. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Kenneth C. Bass, III, Esq.

Gene C. Schaerr, Esq. FEB 0 9 2009

imh iiüriDALy

s8 CLERK

2009-1130	 - 2 -
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1653

G. JOSEPH BELLEFEUILLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-98-3743-9-17BD) Submitted: December 21, 2000 Decided: January 9, 2001 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Layne Birdsong, RICHARDSON & BIRDSONG, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J.Rene Josey, United States Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Regional Chief Counsel, Michele M. Kelley, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Joseph Bellefeuille appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s decision denying Bellefeuille’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bellefeuille v. Apfel , No. CA-98-3743-9- 17BD (D.S.C. Mar. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report").



The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 19th day of May 2009.



| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | ------------------------------
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | XENACARE HOLDINGS, INC.       
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | /s/ Bobby Story               
| |  |  | Name: Bobby Story             
| |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Group Realty Trust (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A. Patterson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey A. Patterson

 

 

Jeffrey A. Patterson

President and Chief Executive Officer

March 15, 2006
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 E0 02 7 . PETER CHATEL v . LESLI E P. CARROLL

Th e Ap p l ican t i n t h e ab o v e-s t y l ed cas e h as fi l ed a n e m erg en cy m o t i o n p u rs u an t

t o Co u rt Ru l e 4 0 (b ) en t it l ed M o t i o n To Ex t en d Ti m e t o Fi l e Ap p l i cat i o n Fo r Di s cret io n ary Ap p eal

. Up o n co n s i d erat i o n an d rev i ew, s ai d m o t i o n is h e r e by
G R A NTED p u rs u an t t o Co u rt Ru l es 1 6 (c) an d 3 1 (i ). Th e ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cretiona r y

rev i ew, cu rren t ly d u e o n J an u ary 2 0
, 2 0 2 2
, m u s t b e f i l e d o n or b efo re J an u ary 2 7,
2 0 2 2

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 19, 2022

01/19/2022
#### Fredrick D. SHERRILL, Appellant, v. Gail B. MERISOTES, Respondent.

No. 64443.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Feb. 7, 1995.

Terrasita A. Cuffie, St. Louis, for appellant.

Daniel T. Rabbitt, Sandra A. Steiniger, Rabbitt, Pitzer & Snodgrass, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and • KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered following a jury verdict finding no fault by either party in an automobile collision case. The verdict is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. *Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transp. Comm’n,*859 S.W.2d 681, 692[15,16] (Mo. banc 1993).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 10.35


                      NORTH ATLANTIC TRADING COMPANY, INC.
                       1999 EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PLAN

The 1999 Executive Incentive Plan (the "Executive Plan") is based on the
Company achieving its budgeted EBITDA, determined on a consolidated basis in
accordance with the Company's 1999 budget. The participants in the Executive
Plan are Thomas F. Helms, Jr. and David I. Brunson.

In the event the Company's EBITDA for 1999 equals or exceeds budgeted EBITDA,
the participants in the Executive Plan shall be entitled to receive bonuses as
follows:

            Participants                                  Bonus Amount
            ------------                                  ------------

            Helms                                       100% of base salary
            Brunson                                      50% of base salary


In the event the Company's EBITDA for 1999 is less than the budgeted EBITDA, the
Management Committee, acting with the advice of the Compensation Committee,
shall have the right to make discretionary bonus payments to one or more of the
participants in the Executive Plan.

If the Management Committee determines that it is highly probable that bonuses
will be earned pursuant to the Executive Plan, it shall have the right to
accelerate the payment of such bonuses if requested by a participant for tax
purposes, subject to receiving a written undertaking to repay such amounts if in
fact no bonus is earned. Nothing in this Executive Plan restricts the Management
Committee from approving other bonuses for any participant in the Executive
Plan.









NY2:\893953\02\J5S102!.DOC\64980.0003
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1736

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Joe Mack Pool, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 18, 2008 Filed: January 24, 2008

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Joe Mack Pool (Pool) appeals the prison sentence the district court imposed following remand. We again remand for resentencing. Pool was found guilty of conspiring to commit bribery and money laundering, and multiple counts of aiding and abetti ng bribery and money laundering. His Guidelines imprisonment range was 33-41 months. After considering dozens of character letters, the testimony of severa l supportive witnesses, and each 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, the district court sentenced P ool to 5 years of probation, with the first year to be served in a halfway house. Th e court relied in particular on the value of preserving Pool’s business and his employees’ jobs, the need for Pool to continue his-2- significant charitable activities, and the existence of his medical problems. See United States v. Pool , 474 F.3d 1127, 1128-29 (8th Cir. 2007). The government appealed, and this cour t vacated the probationary sentence as an unreasonable variance, noting that while th e circumstances the district court relied on were “appropriate considera tions, the court gave too much weight” to these factors, which did “not justify a variance of this magnitude,” and gave insufficient weight to other section 3553(a) factors, such as the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities. See id. at 1129-30. On remand, without addressing the grounds Pool asserted in support of a variance, the district court sentenced him to 33 months in prison. The court stated only that it had “carefully considered the guidelines,” and that it had “an affirmative duty” to impose a sentence that would meet the need to promote respect for the law, protect the public, deter criminal conduct, and provide opportunities for treatment.
After careful review, we are concer ned the district court’s decision to resentence Pool within the Guidelines ra nge--without even mentioning the factors it had previously cited as grounds for a variance--may indicate that the court felt constrained to do so by the remanding opinion. The district court’s discretion was not so limited, however, as the Supreme Court s ubsequently made clear in Gall v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 586, 602 (2007) (explaining thatan appellate cour t must give “due deference to the District Court’s reasone d and reasonable decision that the § 3553(a) factors, on the whole, justified th e sentence,” rather than “decide de novo whether the justification for a variance is suffi cient or the sentence reasonable”). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing in light of Gall

.

______________________________