alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp. III (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Marlene Krauss, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                                       |  |  |  |                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Marlene Krauss, M.D.                              |  |  |  | Dated: November 13, 2007
|    |  | Marlene Krauss, M.D.                                  |  |  |  |                         
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  |
1 On December 14, 2010, the court entered an order erroneously referencing an

“Order Adopting Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation,” which judgment this

amended judgment replaces. No magistrate judge’s report and recommendation exists

in this case.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

JEFFREY J. BROWN, 

Petitioner,

v.

BLAINE LAFLER,

Respondent.

 /

Case No. 09-10852

AMENDED JUDGMENT

In accordance with the court’s “Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability”1 dated December 14,

2010,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of

Respondent Blaine Lafler and against Petitioner Jeffrey J. Brown. Dated at Detroit,

Michigan, this 22d day of December 2010.

 DAVID J. WEAVER

 CLERK OF THE COURT

 S/ Lisa Wagner 

By: Lisa Wagner, Case Manager

 to Judge Robert H. Cleland

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\09-10852.BROWN.Amended.Judgment.wpd
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2015

No. 04-15-00234-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.F.B., ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-10-0610-CVW

Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Dorothy D.B.’s second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to August 3, 2015. Further extension of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Fialka

Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 42 Att. 7

Dockets.Justia.com
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.43
 
 
    Restricted Period(s)
    
    See Paragraph 5
         1




---



##### 



Percentage of 
Shares Vesting
    
    Cumulative
Percentage Vested
    
    Vesting Date (when Restricted Period Ends)
       2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATIONBy:Its:
 4




---



##### 



GRANTEEI acknowledge having received, read and
understood the Plan and this Agreement, and agree to
all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
 (Signature)(Please print your name)(Please print your residence address)
 5
Order issued February 25, 2014, Withdrawn; Order filed February 26, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00502-CV

____________

CHRISTINE E. REULE, Appellant

V.

M & T MORTGAGE, M & T BANK BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC, 

BAYVIEW FINANCIAL TRADING GROUP, LP, BAYVIEW 

FINANCIAL LP AND HUGHS, WATTERS, ASKANASE, LLP, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2008-75636

O R D E R

On November 25, 2013, this court ordered the Harris County District Clerk 

to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before March 14, 2014, containing the 

trial court’s Order Regarding Transcripts signed on or about January 9, 2014.
2

Counsel for appellees notified the court that the requested order is included 

in the Supplemental Clerk’s Record filed January 17, 2014. 

Accordingly, we WITHDRAW the order issued February 25, 2014, 

requiring a supplemental clerk’s record.

PER CURIAM
#### Stella M. PADGETT, Appellant, v. EXPRESS PERSONNEL SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 70154.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 22, 1996.

John B. Schwabe, II, Howard J. Berman, Law Firm of John B. Schwabe, II, St. Louis, for appellant.

Mark R. Kornblum, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Stella M. Padgett (“claimant”), appeals the Final Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying her claim for compensation for a work-related injury. We affirm.

We have read the briefs of the parties and have reviewed the legal file and find the Final Award of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence and no error of law appears. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion, we affirm the Commission’s award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1998
<CASH>                                          49,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,959
<PP&E>                                          11,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,744
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                         2,164
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  653,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (665,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (665,580)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Don Marcos Trading Co. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Earl T. Shannon
and Scott W. Bodenweber, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
August 13, 2008





/s/
      Earl T. Shannon


Earl T.
Shannon


President





Date:
August 13, 2008





/s/
Scott W.
Bodenweber


Scott W.
Bodenweber


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Promotions On Wheels
      Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Rowland W. Day II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            */s/
                Rowland W. Day II*Rowland
                W. Day IIChief
                Executive Officer




Dated:
      November 18, 2008





This
      certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Promotions On Wheels Holdings, Inc. and
      will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20006-06

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

MICHAEL BELL,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On November 12, 2009, this case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

November 13, 2009. In open court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by

Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense to which Defendant pleaded guilty is supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of the offense. Therefore, I have ordered the preparation

of a presentence investigation report.

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 151, PageID.446 Filed 11/13/09 Page 1 of 3
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and Recommendation

within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure

to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins. Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596

(6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The parties are

advised that making some objections, but failing to raise others, will not preserve all the objections

a party may have to this Report and Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security,

474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir. 2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich.

LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: November 13, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on and served on District Judge Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: November 13, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 151, PageID.447 Filed 11/13/09 Page 2 of 3
3

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 151, PageID.448 Filed 11/13/09 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solutions Mechanical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffery Thompson, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Jeffery Thompson Jeffery Thompson Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   July 9, 2007
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FIDEL CRUZ FLETES, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-70671 

Agency No. A098-598-530 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Immigration Judge 

Submitted December 2, 2020**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. 

Fidel Cruz Fletes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of 

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) determination under 8 C.F.R. § 1208.31(a) that he 

did not have a reasonable fear of persecution or torture in Honduras and is thus not 

entitled to relief from his reinstated removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review an IJ’s negative reasonable fear determination for 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-70671 

substantial evidence. Andrade-Garcia v. Lynch, 828 F.3d 829, 833 (9th Cir. 2016). 

We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. 

To the extent Cruz Fletes raises an imputed political opinion claim, we lack 

jurisdiction to consider it. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 

2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to consider claims not raised below).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Cruz Fletes failed 

to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of persecution in Honduras on account of a 

protected ground. See Reyes v. Lynch, 842 F.3d 1125, 1131 (9th Cir. 2016) (in 

order to demonstrate membership in a particular group, “[t]he applicant must 

‘establish that the group is (1) composed of members who share a common 

immutable characteristic, (2) defined with particularity, and (3) socially distinct 

within the society in question’” (quoting Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227, 

237 (BIA 2014))); see also Ramirez-Munoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 1226, 1229 (9th 

Cir. 2016) (imputed wealthy returnee social group not cognizable); Delgado-Ortiz 

v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2010) (returnee-based social group not 

cognizable).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s determination that Cruz Fletes

failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of torture by or with the consent of 

the government if returned to Honduras. See Andrade-Garcia, 828 F.3d at 836-37

(no reasonable possibility of torture with state action). 
3 20-70671 

We reject as unsupported by the record Cruz Fletes’ contention that the IJ 

violated his right to due process. 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 2) and supplemental 

motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 8) are otherwise denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 96-068]

Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Inventions for Licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.
    Copies of patent applications cited are available from the Office 
of Patent Counsel, Kennedy Space Center, Mail Code DE-TPO, Kennedy 
Space Center, FL 32899. Claims are deleted from the patent applications 
to avoid premature disclosure.

DATES: July 9, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William J. Sheehan, Patent Counsel, Mail Code DE-TPO, Kennedy Space 
Center, FL 32899; telephone (407) 867-2544, fax (407) 867-2050.
    NASA Case No. KSC-11,694: Balanced Rotating Spray Tank and Pipe 
Cleaning and Cleanliness Verification System;
    NASA Case No. KSC-11,685: Portable Light Source Unit for Simulating 
Fires;
    NASA Case No. KSC-11,722: Optical Detector Calibrator System;
    NASA Case No. KSC-11,775: Flame Detector;

    Dated: June 27, 1996.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-17308 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,822
<SECURITIES>                                    13,322
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (345)
<INVENTORY>                                        299
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,969
<PP&E>                                          17,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,029)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,604
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,950
<OTHER-SE>                                     (27,306)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,248
<SALES>                                         52,078
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,078
<CGS>                                            8,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,877
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,774)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,120
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (33,015)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.64)


</TABLE>
No. 72-1101.

#### Swords *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.26

GRAPHIC

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 2003

EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2003

|NAME:          |  | PRESTON ROMM       |  | 
|-------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
|TITLE:         |  | CFO                |  | 
|BASE SALARY:   |  | $200,000           |  | 
|ON-PLAN BONUS: |  | 50% of Base Salary |  | 
|              

BONUS

Bonus is calculated based on a percentage of base salary.

Bonus
will be paid once annually as soon as practicable after an audit of the Company's fiscal year 2003 results has been completed and after the Dot Hill Board of Directors and/or
Compensation Committee ("BOD") has approved the payment.

70%
of bonus potential is tied to Dot Hill's overall 2003 annual operating plan.



20%
of bonus potential is subjective and may be tied to individual departmental goals and performance.

10%
of bonus potential is subjective and will be based on the company's performance with respect to management of its working capital and cash flow.

TERMS

a.    You
must be an employee in good standing on the date of payout to be eligible for the bonus payout.

b.    The
base salary and bonus structure may be revised by the BOD at any time, with no notice.

---

c.    You
are eligible for all benefits afforded Regular Full-time Exempt employees as set fort in the most current version of the Dot Hill Employee Handbook.

d.    The
terms, conditions, and benefits of your employment with Dot Hill Systems Corporation are governed by the terms of the Employment Agreement and the standard Company
policies and benefits. No verbal promises, verbal commitments, or implied promises will alter the Employment Agreement or these standard policies and benefits.

e.    The
employment relationship between the parties is "at will" and may be terminated by Dot Hill at any time.

|/s/ JIM LAMBERTJim Lambert,President/CEO |  | /s/ PRESTON ROMMPreston Romm,CFO
|---------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------

---

QuickLinks