alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Borough of Petersburg *versus Noss.*

Under the Act of March 25th 1864, § 12, a borough whose authorities had paid no bounties to volunteers cannot levy a tax to pay bounties to veterans, although bounties have been paid to volunteers by the voluntary subscriptions of the citizens.

Appeal from the decree of the Court of Common Pleas of *Perry county.*In Equity.

Samuel Noss and Nathan Yanfossen filed a bill against the council of the borough of Petersburg, to restrain them from levying a tax to pay bounties to nineteen veterans who had reenlisted in Tennessee, and had been credited to the borough; the remainder of the borough’s quota had been filled by volunteers who had received bounties from voluntary contributions of the citizens. The council answered that the tax was authorized by § 12 of the Act of March 25th 1864, viz.: “ In case any .veteran soldiers who have re-enlisted, and have not been credited to any special locality, shall hereafter be credited, on the present draft, to the locality from which they originally volunteered, such veterans shall be paid by the local authorities, whose duty is to pay bounties, "such bounties as under the provisions of this act shall be paid to volunteers from said locality.”

The court (Graham, P. J.) granted an injunction as prayed for, which was the error assigned.

*W. A. iSponsler*and *B. P.*Junhin, for the appellants.

The Reporter, had no paper-book for appellees.

The opinion was delivered June 1st 1866.

Per Curiam.

The 12th section of the Act of 25th March 1864, Pamph. L. 90, does not cover the case of the nineteen veterans credited to Petersburg on the 19th of August 1864. The law made their claim for bounties contingent on the payment of bounties to volunteers in the same district.

None ever having been authorized, levied or paid to volunteers, the provision for veterans never took effect. The decree of the court below is therefore affirmed.
DYKEMA GOSSETT•A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY•2723 SOUTH STATE STREET, SUITE 400•ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

GRETA JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMERICAN RED CROSS and MARY 

DOWNS, L.P.N., 

Defendants. 

 

Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-15130 

Honorable Julian Abele Cook 

Geoffrey N. Fieger (P30441) 

Arnold J. Matusz (P33203) 

FIEGER, FIEGER, KENNEY, JOHNSON &

GIROUX, P.C. 

19390 West Ten Mile Road 

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 355-5555 

amatusz@fiegerlaw.com 

 

Jill M. Wheaton (P49921) 

K. J. Miller (P62014) 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendants 

2723 South State Street, Suite 400 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(734) 214-7660 

jwheaton@dykema.com 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES that this action be 

dismissed, with prejudice and without costs to either party.. 

s/ Arnold J. Matusz . s/Jill M. Wheaton 

Arnold J. Matusz (P33203) Jill M. Wheaton (P49921) 

Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendants 

amatusz@fiegerlaw.com jwheaton@dykema.com 

Case 2:08-cv-15130-JAC-VMM ECF No. 17 filed 06/11/09 PageID.131 Page 1 of 2
 2 

 DYKEMA GOSSETT•A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY•2723 SOUTH STATE STREET, SUITE 400•ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

GRETA JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

AMERICAN RED CROSS and MARY 

DOWNS, L.P.N., 

Defendants. 

 

Civil Action No. 2:08-cv-15130 

Honorable Julian Abele Cook 

Geoffrey N. Fieger (P30441) 

Arnold J. Matusz (P33203) 

FIEGER, FIEGER, KENNEY, JOHNSON &

GIROUX, P.C. 

19390 West Ten Mile Road 

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 355-5555 

amatusz@fiegerlaw.com

 

Jill M. Wheaton (P49921) 

K. J. Miller (P62014) 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

Attorneys for Defendants 

2723 South State Street, Suite 400 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

(734) 214-7660 

jwheaton@dykema.com 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS

The parties having signed a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice and Without Costs, 

and being otherwise fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice and 

without costs to either party. 

Dated: June 11, 2009 S/Julian Abele Cook, Jr. 

 Hon. Julian Abel Cook, Jr. 

 United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:08-cv-15130-JAC-VMM ECF No. 17 filed 06/11/09 PageID.132 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,352
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,084
<PP&E>                                         276,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,663,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,961
<BONDS>                                      1,748,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          262,368
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,076
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,343,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,663,002
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               517,467
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  298,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               158,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (91,786)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (89,456)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (7,305)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (96,761)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. (NY 15873, admitted pro hac vice)

pcambria@lglaw.com

Erin E. McCampbell (NY 4480166, admitted pro hac vice)

emccampbell@lglaw.com

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120

Buffalo, New York 14202

Telephone: (716) 849-1333

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580

Attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey

 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

DEFENDANT LACEY’S NOTICE OF 

JOINDER IN DEFENDANT LARKIN’S 

OPPOSITION TO GIVERNMENT’S 

APPLICATION FOR ORDER 

REGARDING CRIMINAL FORFEITURE 

OF PROPERTY IN GOVERNMENT 

CUSTODY

“Defendant Not in Custody”

(Honorable Steven P. Logan)

Defendant Michael Lacey by and through his undersigned counsel, joins in defendant 

James Larkin’s Opposition to Government’s Application for Order Regarding Criminal 

Forfeiture of Property in Government Custody filed on August 28, 2018 (Doc. 285).

Defendant Lacey agrees with the arguments made in Defendant Larkin’s Opposition. 

Defendant Lacey adopts the positions set forth in said Opposition as if fully set forth herein. The 

issues raised in the Opposition apply with equal force to Mr. Lacey. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 293 Filed 08/31/18 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted this 31st day of August, 2018

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP

/s/ Paul J. Cambria, Jr.

Attorneys for Defendant

Michael Lacey

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 293 Filed 08/31/18 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 31st day of August 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF 

version of this document to the Clerk of the Court by filing with the CM/ECF system and 

understand a copy of the filing will be emailed to the attorneys of record.

By: /s/ April Kelly

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 293 Filed 08/31/18 Page 3 of 3
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 12, 2009 | /s/      Qingqing Wu               |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                         | Qingqing      Wu                   |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                         | (Principal      Executive Officer) |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1698]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP94-96-016 and RP94-213-013 (Consolidated)]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

January 22, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 17, 1996, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, and its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 2A, 
various tariff sheets. CNG requested an effective date on July 1, 1994, 
for certain of these sheets, and a January 1, 1996 effective date for 
the remainder. CNG states that it has also submitted intervening sheets 
with various effective dates, as indicated in Attachment A to the 
transmittal letter of CNG's filing.
    CNG states that the purpose of its filing is to submit the 
remainder of the tariff sheets from appendices to the June 28. 
Stipulation, and intervening sheets that were filed by CNG in various 
dockets and approved by the Commission, subsequent to the captioned 
proceedings. CNG further states that it has made one formatting 
improvement to the rate tariff sheets enclosed: to more clearly state 
the rates for CNG services on Sheet Nos. 31 through 37 of its tariff, 
CNG has revised the designation of rates so that each rate will be 
expressed as dollars per Dt, rather than a combination of rate 
components expressed in terms of dollars per Dt and cents per Dt.
    CNG states that copies of this letter of transmittal and enclosures 
are being mailed to parties to the captioned proceeding, and to CNG's 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20426, 
in accordance with Section 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
FR Doc. 96-1698 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Robert E. BERGHAUS, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Janette M. LOHMAN, Missouri Director of Revenue, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 69711.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 3, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 17, 1996.

Lester W. Duggan, St. Charles, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GAERTNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals the judgment of the trial court denying an administrative D.W.I. trial de novo for reinstatement of his driver’s license after revocation by the Director. Petitioner alleges the trial court erred when it received three exhibits into evidence, in denying his motion for judgment, and in denying his motion to open and amend judgment. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Jeffery Thompson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solutions Mechanical, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 14, 2009   /s/ Jeffery Thompson Jeffery Thompson Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
---

|TERRACE VENTURES INC.            
|---------------------------------
|Suite 201, 810 Peace Portal Drive
|Blaine, WA 98230                 
|                                 

June 29, 2011

|PENGRAM CORPORATION         
|----------------------------
|1200 Dupont Street, Suite 2J
|Bellingham, WA 98225        

Attention: Richard W. Donaldson, President

Dear Sirs:

Re: Option to Acquire Golden Snow
PropertyEarn-In
Agreement dated April 26, 2011

We write to confirm our agreement to amend the above-referenced
agreement by extending the maturity date of the Promissory Note issued in favor
of Pengram Corporation pursuant to Paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Earn-In Agreement
from June 10, 2011 to September 27, 2011 (being 90 days from date of this
amendment agreement). In consideration of this extension, Terrace will pay
interest on the principal sum of $25,000 at the rate of 10% per annum,
calculated from the date of execution of the Earn-In Agreement, being April 26,
2011.

Please sign where indicated below confirming our agreement in
this matter.

Yours truly,

TERRACE VENTURES INC.

|Per: | /s/ Howard Thomson                          | 
|---- | ------------------------------------------- | 
|     |                                             | 
|     | Howard Thomson                              | 
|     | President and Chief Executive
      Officer | 

Agreed and accepted as of the 29th day of June, 2011.

PENGRAM CORPORATION

|Per: | /s/ Richard W. Donaldson                    | 
|---- | ------------------------------------------- | 
|     |                                             | 
|     | Richard W. Donaldson                        | 
|     | President and Chief Executive
      Officer | 

---
Exhibit 10.7.4

 

EIGHTH AMENDMENT
 TO
  AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

 

This Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement (the “Amendment”), is made and entered into as of December 13, 2013, by and between SQUARE 1 BANK (“Bank”) and RALLY SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT CORP. (“Borrower”).

 

RECITALS

 

Borrower and Bank are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 22, 2010 (as amended from time to time, the “Agreement”). The parties desire to amend the Agreement in accordance with the terms of this Amendment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

 

1)             The last paragraph of Section 6.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated, as follows:

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Borrower shall be required to deliver to Bank the documentation set forth in Section 6.2(a) above only if there are outstanding Advances or Ancillary Services under the Revolving Line in excess of $500,000.

 

2)             Unless otherwise defined, all initially capitalized terms in this Amendment shall be as defined in the Agreement.  The Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its respective terms and hereby is ratified and confirmed in all respects.  Except as expressly set forth herein, the execution, delivery, and performance of this Amendment shall not operate as a waiver of, or as an amendment of, any right, power, or remedy of Bank under the Agreement, as in effect prior to the date hereof.  Borrower ratifies and reaffirms the continuing effectiveness of all agreements entered into in connection with the Agreement.

 

3)             Borrower represents and warrants that the representations and warranties contained in the Agreement are true and correct as of the date of this Amendment.

 

4)             This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.

 

5)             As a condition to the effectiveness of this Amendment, Bank shall have received, in form and substance satisfactory to Bank, the following:

 

a)             this Amendment, duly executed by Borrower;

 

b)             payment of all Bank Expenses incurred through the date of this Amendment, including any UCC, good standing or intellectual property search or filing fees, which may be debited from any of Borrower’s accounts; and

 

c)              such other documents and completion of such other matters, as Bank may reasonably deem necessary or appropriate.

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the first date above written.

 

	
RALLY   SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
    	
SQUARE   1 BANK
    
	
CORP.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   James M. Lejeal
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Zack Robbins
    
	
Name:
    	
James   M. Lejeal
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Zack   Robbins
    
	
Title:
    	
CFO
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
VP
    


 

[Signature Page to Eighth Amendment to

Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement]

 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3867 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3867

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 1996

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights 
             Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Developmental Disabilities 
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

    Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROTECTION AND 
              ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.

    Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.

SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO UNIVERSITY 
              AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

    Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and 
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is amended by striking ``the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 
through 1999''.

SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROJECTS OF NATIONAL 
              SIGNIFICANCE.

    Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and 
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is amended by striking ``the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 
through 1999''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```