alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I,
Wang Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated
      this 15th
      day of June, 2009./s/ Wang Hui
              Wang
      Hui, Director and Chief Executive
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35862-35863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 35863]]


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of 
Veterans Affairs, has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) the following proposal for the collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    OMB Control Number: None assigned.
    Title and Form Number: Direct Deposit Enrollment, VA Form 24-0296 
(Test).
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Need and Uses: The form will be used to gather the necessary 
information required to enroll VA Compensation and Pension 
beneficiaries in the Direct Deposit/Electronic Funds Transfer (DD/EFT) 
program for recurring benefits payments. The information will be used 
to process the payment data from VA to the beneficiary's designated 
financial institution.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 2,800 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 2 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: One time.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 84,000.

ADDRESSES: A copy of this submission may be obtained from Ron Taylor, 
VA Clearance Officer (045A4), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015.
    Comments and recommendations concerning the submission should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-4650. Do not send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer within 30 days of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Taylor, VA Clearance Officer 
(045A4), (202) 273-8015.

    Dated: June 25, 1996.

    By direction of the Secretary.
William T. Morgan,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 96-17207 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.3


                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
The Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables, included in the
accompanying Management Report on Internal Control Over Servicing of Securitized
Automobile Financing Receivables. Management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over such functions. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the internal control over servicing of securitized
automobile financing receivables, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of the internal control, and such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that, as of December 31, 2000, The Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. maintained an effective system of internal control over
servicing of securitized automobile financing receivables, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based upon the criteria for effective internal control
described in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
March 26, 2001
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-20023-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

 v.

D-3 DERRICK JAMES MOORE,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO THE CONSPIRACY COUNT OF THE

SECOND SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT, AND TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA

AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on August 24, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on

August 25, 2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty. As of today’s

date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The

failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith

v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure

to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review

the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings

and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 88] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to the conspiracy count of the

Case 1:09-cr-20023-TLL-PTM ECF No. 112, PageID.379 Filed 09/18/09 Page 1 of 2
-2-

second superseding indictment is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 82] is taken

UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: September 18, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on September 18, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

Case 1:09-cr-20023-TLL-PTM ECF No. 112, PageID.380 Filed 09/18/09 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements the Form S-8 (Nos. 333-87123 and 333-30108) of Streamline.com,
Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2000 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 9, 2000 relating to
the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**I. DEAN FULTON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 111 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of September, 2016, the Motion for Le ave to File Petition** 

**for Allowance of Appeal in Excess of 9,000 Words is** DENIED **. Petitioner is** DIRECTED

**to file a compliant Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 30 days.**
Order entered September 24, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00746 - CV JEK LENDING, L.L.C., Appellant

V. ANTELOPE 2001, L.P., Appellee On Appeal from the 1 93rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 03599



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 20, 2018 unopposed second motion to abate appeal or, alternatively, motion for extension of time to file a brief. We GRAN T appellant’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief and extend the time to October 24, 2018

. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 158 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.18






Exhibit 10.18




December 17, 2008




Mrs. Phyllis A. Knight

5145 Old Mill Road

Rochester, MI 48306




     Re:      409A Revision to Employment Letter



Dear Phyllis:




     Champion is in the process of amending its employment, severance, change in control and other
nonqualified deferred compensation plans to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
It has come to our attention that the severance provision in Paragraph 10 of your October 17, 2002
employment letter does not comply with Code Section 409A.



     The severance benefit itself can remain as currently written, but due to your status as a
highly compensated employee of a publicly traded company, payment of the severance benefit must be
delayed for six months, after which it will be paid to you on the first day of the seventh month
after your separation from service (or death, if earlier). On the first day of the seventh month,
any withheld payments will be aggregated and paid to you in a lump sum, with the remaining payments
occurring on normal payment dates.



     Without conforming the benefit to the Code Section 409A payment delay, the tax consequences
are egregious. In addition to paying tax at the ordinary rate, you would be subject to a 20%
penalty tax and the IRS underpayment rate plus 1%, on the amount of the benefit.



     If you are in agreement with the employment letter modification described in the second
paragraph herein, please sign and date the letter where indicated below. Except as modified by
this letter and the letter to you from A. A. Koch dated August 14, 2003, the terms and conditions
of your October 17, 2002 employment letter remain in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 Sincerely,

/s/ William C. Griffiths

William C. Griffiths

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 



	 	 	 
	ACCEPTED:
	 	 
	/s/  Phyllis A. Knight
	 	 
	 

Phyllis A. Knight

	 	 






Dated:
  December 17, 2008
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3744

To require the Attorney General to promulgate regulations relating to genderrelated persecution, including female genital mutilation, for use in determining an alien’s eligibility for asylum or withholding of deportation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 27, 1996

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr.

CLYBURN, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. EVANS, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr.

FROST, Ms. FURSE, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. NORTON, Ms.

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LAFALCE, Ms. MCCARTHY, Ms.

MCKINNEY, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Mr. NADLER,

Mr. PAYNE of New Jersey, Mr. OLVER, Miss COLLINS of Michigan, Mrs.

SCHROEDER, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require the Attorney General to promulgate regulations

relating to gender-related persecution, including female

genital mutilation, for use in determining an alien’s eligibility for asylum or withholding of deportation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3744 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO PROMULGATE REGULA2 TIONS CONCERNING GENDER-RELATED PER3 SECUTION.

4 (a) REGULATIONS FOR USE IN EVALUATING ASYLUM

5 APPLICATIONS.—The Attorney General shall promulgate

6 regulations, which shall apply to the determination of an

7 alien’s eligibility to be granted asylum under section

8 208(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, interpret9 ing, in a manner consistent with international law and

10 standards, the term ‘‘persecution’’, as used in section

11 101(a)(42)(A) of such Act, to include gender-related per12 secution, including female genital mutilation. The regula13 tions under this subsection may not create burdens, or in14 crease requirements, for establishing persecution beyond

15 those established by international law and standards and

16 recent decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

17 (b) REGULATIONS FOR USE IN WITHHOLDING DE18 PORTATION OR RETURN.—The Attorney General shall

19 promulgate regulations relating to gender-related persecu20 tion, including female genital mutilation, which shall apply

21 to the determination under section 243(h) of the Immigra22 tion and Nationality Act. The regulations under this sub23 section shall be consistent, to the extent appropriate under

24 such Act, with the regulations under subsection (a).

25 (c) DEADLINE.—The Attorney General shall promul26 gate the regulations required by this Act not later than
3

•HR 3744 IH

1 the date that is 30 days after the date of the enactment

2 of this Act.

3 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term

4 ‘‘gender-related persecution’’ means a harm that—

5 (1) is specific to, or disproportionately affects,

6 women on the ground of their gender; and

7 (2) otherwise would be considered persecution

8 for purposes of section 101(a)(42)(A) of the Immi9 gration and Nationality Act.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                             SUMMARY OF KEY TERMS OF
                NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

      Corillian's CEO and four most highly compensated executive officers (the
"named executive officers") are generally compensated pursuant to oral, informal
compensation arrangements. Material elements of Corillian's compensation
arrangements with its named executive officers consist of a base salary,
participation in an incentive cash bonus program and equity compensation awards.

      The following table sets forth the current base salaries for Corillian's
named executive officers.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXECUTIVE OFFICER                             CURRENT SALARY
-----------------                             --------------
<S>                                           <C>
Alex P. Hart                                  $      280,000
Paul K. Wilde                                 $      200,000
Christopher L. Brooks                         $      200,000
Erich J. Litch                                $      190,000
Andre Bouchard                                $      185,000
</TABLE>

      Named executive officers are also eligible to receive discretionary
bonuses on a semi-annual basis. The following table sets forth the target bonus
amounts for 2005 for the named executive officers as a percentage of base
salary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              2005 BONUS
EXECUTIVE OFFICER                               TARGET
-----------------                             ----------
<S>                                           <C>
Erich J. Litch                                    105%
Andre Bouchard                                     42%
Alex P. Hart                                       41%
Christopher L. Brooks                              20%
Paul K. Wilde                                      16%
</TABLE>

Corillian's named executive officers are eligible to receive awards under
Corillian's equity compensation plans. All option grants to executive officers
are approved by the Compensation Committee. Guidelines for the number of options
granted to named executive officers have been established, and are reviewed
periodically, by the Compensation Committee to ensure competitiveness. The
Compensation Committee determines the terms of actual grants based on individual
performance and contribution to our strategic success. Options granted to
Corillian's named executive officers generally have a term of ten years.

Corillian has entered into severance agreements with its named executive
officers pursuant to which they will receive certain severance benefits if their
employment with Corillian terminates under certain circumstances, including if
their employment terminates in certain circumstances within one year following a
change in control of Corillian.

Occasionally, Corillian reimburses newly hired executives for relocation
expenses. Named executive officers also participate in Corillian's other
employee benefit plans on the same basis as other employees.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-Q of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the nine months ended October 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert
Malasek, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.

Date: December 13, 2011


/s/ ROBERT MALASEK
-------------------------------------
Robert Malasek
Chief Accounting Officer
Chief Financial Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Parts 119, 121, and 135

[Docket No. 28154; Amendments Nos. 119-2, 121-256, 135-65 and SFAR 38-
13]
RIN 2120-AG03


Operating Requirements: Domestic Flag, Supplemental, Commuter, 
and On-Demand Operations: Corrections and Editorial Changes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final rule 
published in the Federal Register on June 14, 1996 (61 FR 30432). The 
final rule adopted changes that were editorial or typographical in 
nature in parts 119, 121, and 135. The changes were necessary to 
correct errors or clarify the intent of the regulations published in 
December 20, 1996 (60 FR 65832).

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda William, (202) 267-9685.

Correction of Publication

    In rule document 96-14565, on page 30432, in the issue of Friday, 
June 14, 1996, make the following correction:
    On page 30432, in the first column, in the heading, Amendment No. 
``121-259'' should read ``121-256'', and SFAR 38-13 should be added to 
the heading.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 1, 1996.
Joseph A. Conte,
Acting Chief Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 96-17226 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS*



I, Robert L. Nichols, certify that:



1)

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PanAmerican Bancorp;



2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4)

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5)

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting



Date: March 16, 2005





/s/ROBERTL. NICHOLS

Robert L. Nichols

Chief Financial Officer