alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUP R EME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE 37 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

: NO. 486

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31 st day of May
, 20 22 , upon consideration of the Petition to
Reestablish the Magisterial Districts of the 37 th Judicial District ( Forest and Warren

Count ies ) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND
DECREED that the Petition, which provides for the reestablishment of Magisterial District

37

- 4

- 03 within Forest County, to be effective im mediately, is granted; and that the
Petition, which provides for the reestablishment of Magisterial Districts 37

- 2

- 01, 37

- 3

- 01,

and 37

- 4

- 01, within Warren County, to be effective immediately, is granted.

Said Magisterial Districts shall be as follows:

Magisterial District 37

- 2

- 01 Magisterial District Judge Raymond F. Zydonik City of Warren Cherry Grove Township Sheffield Township

Magisterial District 37

- 3

- 01 Magisterial District Judge Laura S. Bauer Clarendon Borough Sugar Grove Borough Conewango Township Elk Township Farmington Township Glade Township Mead Township- 2

- Pine Grove Township Sugar Grove Township

Magisterial District 3 7

- 4

- 01 Magisterial District Judge Todd A. Woodin Bear Lake Borough Tidioute Borough Youngsville Borough Brokenstraw Township Columbus Township Deerfield Township Eldred Township Freehold Township Limestone Township Pittsfield Township Pleasant Township Southwest Township Spring Creek Township Triumph Township Watson Township

Magisterial District 37

- 4

- 03 Magisterial District Judge Daniel L. Miller Tionesta Borough Barnett Township Green Township Harmony Township Hickory Township Howe Township Jenks Township Kingsley Township Tionesta Township
#### James Steven McELHANEY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 60802.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 23, 1992.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 30, 1992.

Application to Transfer Denied Jan. 26, 1993.

Cheryl Rafert, Sindel & Sindel, P.C., Clayton, for movant/appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robin H. Grissom, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for defendant/respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 24.035 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-15253

JASON SCHNEIDER, HONORABLE AVERN COHN

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 150)

AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. 144)

I.

This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claimed that

several defendants, police officers from the Oak Park and Southfield Police

Departments, violated his constitutional rights while effectuating his arrest and denying

him proper medical care. The matter has been referred to a magistrate judge for all

pretrial proceedings. Following dispositive motions by defendants, only plaintiff’s claims

against Southfield police officer Jason Schneider remain. 

Thereafter, plaintiff also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order or

preliminary injunction, essentially complaining about inadequate law materials at the

prison facility. On December 6, 2012, the magistrate judge issued a report and

recommendation (MJRR) that the motion be denied. The magistrate judge reasoned

that because plaintiff is no longer housed at the correctional facility where he alleges the

2:08-cv-15253-AC-MAR Doc # 151 Filed 01/10/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1399
1

The MJRR stated that objections were to be filed within 14 days of service. 

Accounting for service and Court holidays, objections were due at least by December

26, 2012. 

2

law library was inadequate, his claims for injunctive relief were mooted by his transfer. 

Neither party has objected to the MJRR and the time for objections has passed.1

II.

The failure to file objections to the MJRR waives any further right to appeal. 

Smith v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). 

Likewise, the failure to object to the MJRR releases the Court from its duty to

independently review the motions. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

However, the Court has reviewed the MJRR and agrees with the magistrate judge. 

III.

Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are ADOPTED

as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining

order or preliminary injunction is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 10, 2013 S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, January 10, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Sakne Chami 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:08-cv-15253-AC-MAR Doc # 151 Filed 01/10/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1400
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1704]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM96-2-86-001]


Pacific Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Supplemental 
Compliance Filing

January 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 17, 1996, Pacific Gas Transmission 
Company (PGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, Third Revised Sheet No. 6C. PGT requests the 
above-referenced sheet become effective January 1, 1996.
    PGT asserts that the purpose of this filing is to reflect a change 
to the Gas Research Institute (GRI) funding unit adjustment component 
for PGT's Parking Service and Authorized Imbalance Service, in 
compliance with the Commission's October 13, 1995 GRI funding Order in 
Docket No. RP95-374-000.
    PGT further states a copy of this filing has been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies, as 
well as the official service list compiled by the Secretary in this 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1704 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2008 (the Report), I, Paul DSylva, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|April 30, 2008 |  | /s/ Paul DSylva, Ph.D.
|               |  | Paul DSylva, Ph.D.    
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 2 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 3 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 4 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 5 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 6 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 218-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 9 of 9
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAVID EISENBERG

DAVID EISENBERG, P.L.C.

3550 N. Central Avenue, Ste. 1155

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Arizona State Bar No. 017218

Telephone: 602.237.5076

Email: david@deisenbergplc.com

Attorney for Defendant Andrew Padilla

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Andrew Padilla, 

Defendant.

CR-18-00422-06-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANT’S AMENDED

MOTION FOR DEFENDANT TO

APPEAR BY TELEPHONE OR BY

VIDEO TELECONFERENCE

(Hearing Set for July 27, 2023 at 3:00

pm)

The Defendant Andrew Padilla, by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits

the Defendant’s request that he be allowed to appear by telephone or video conference for the

final pretrial conference set for July 27, 2023, starting at 3:00 pm. The grounds for this request

are that Mr. Padilla resides in the Dallas, Texas area. The round trip fare to fly from Dallas to

Phoenix and back is approximately $560, and the hotel cost for two nights would be

approximately $235 (not $470 as originally stated). These expenses do not include ground

transportation. This is a considerable outlay of funds for Mr. Padilla.

Wherefore, the Defendant respectfully requests that the Court enter an order allowing him

to appear telephonically or by video teleconference.

Respectfully submitted this 25th day of July, 2022.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1645 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

s/ David Eisenberg

 

DAVID EISENBERG

Counsel for Defendant Andrew Padilla

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on July 25, 2023, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the

Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic

Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance as counsel of

record. 

 s/ David Eisenberg 

 David Eisenberg

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1645 Filed 07/25/23 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of China Discovery Acquisition Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Michael
      Hsu, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






By: 
                /s/ Michael Hsu
            
            Dated:
              August 19, 2008Michael
                HsuChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3764 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3764

  To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor Management 
 Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional remedies in certain unfair 
             labor practice cases, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 1996

 Mr. Hinchey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor Management 
 Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional remedies in certain unfair 
             labor practice cases, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Labor Relations Remedies Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. BOARD REMEDIES.

    Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 
160(c)) is amended by inserting after the fourth sentence the following 
new sentence: ``If the Board finds that an employee was discharged as a 
result of an unfair labor practice, the Board in such order shall (1) 
award back pay in an amount equal to three times the employee's wage 
rate at the time of the unfair labor practice and (2) notify such 
employee of such employee's right to sue for punitive damages and 
damages with respect to a wrongful discharge under section 303 of the 
Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), as amended by the 
Labor Relations Remedies Act of 1995.''.

SEC. 3. COURT REMEDIES.

    Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 
187), is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:
    ``(c) It shall be unlawful, for purposes of this section, for any 
employer to discharge an employee for exercising rights protected under 
the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158).
    ``(d) An employee whose discharge is determined by the National 
Labor Relations Board under section 10(c) of the National Labor 
Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 160(c)) to be as a result of an unfair labor 
practice under section 8 of such Act may file a civil action in any 
district court of the United States, without respect to the amount in 
controversy, to recover punitive damages or if actionable, in any State 
court to recover damages based on a wrongful discharge.''.
                                 <all>
```
Martha s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 15, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00265

- CV

John DONOHUE

, Appellant

v.

Martha DONOHUE

, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CI19573

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Temporary Relief and Temporary Injunction is DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of May, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 22, 2011 | /s/ Qingqing Wu               |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Qingqing Wu                   |   |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2008-0218.                 

*Date Filed:*                     July 10, 2008.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     Technical Correction: Mail Vote 572—Resolution 010b, TC3 Between South East Asia and South Asian, Subcontinent, Special Passenger Amending Resolution, from Viet Nam to South Asian Subcontinent (Memo 1222),                     *Intended effective date:*                     1 August 2008.                 

 Renee V. Wright 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E8-17449 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3629

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require that photographic evidence

of a person’s identity be presented before a change-of-address order

shall be accepted by the United States Postal Service for processing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 12, 1996

Mr. VENTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to require that

photographic evidence of a person’s identity be presented

before a change-of-address order shall be accepted by

the United States Postal Service for processing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mail Fraud Prevention

5 Act’’.
2

•HR 3629 IH

1 SEC. 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY RE2 QUIRED.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 4 of title 39, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing:

6 ‘‘§ 414. Change-of-address orders

7 ‘‘(a) Except as provided under subsection (b), a

8 change-of-address order sought to be submitted by or on

9 behalf of any person shall not be accepted by the Postal

10 Service unless appropriate photographic evidence of such

11 person’s identity is presented at the time of such order’s

12 submission.

13 ‘‘(b) Regulations to carry out this section shall take

14 effect not later than 6 months after the date of the enact15 ment of this section. The regulations—

16 ‘‘(1) shall include provisions under which—

17 ‘‘(A) the requirements of subsection (a)

18 may be waived in the case of persons who are

19 homebound; and

20 ‘‘(B) alternative measures shall be imple21 mented to carry out the purposes of this section

22 with respect to persons as to whom any waiver

23 under subparagraph (A) applies; and

24 ‘‘(2) may provide for such other exclusions or

25 modifications as the Postal Service considers appro-
3

•HR 3629 IH

1 priate, consistent with the purposes of this section

2 and considerations of practicability.’’.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

4 chapter 4 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by

5 adding at the end the following:

‘‘414. Change-of-address orders.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17263]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 131 / Monday, July 8, 1996 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 35589]]



OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS

5 CFR Part 2634

RIN 3209-AA06


Public Financial Disclosure, Conflicts of Interest, and 
Certificates of Divestiture for Executive Branch Officials; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a typographical error in one of the 
amendatory instructions of the final rule on executive branch 
certificates of divestiture, which was published by OGE in the Federal 
Register on Tuesday, June 25, 1996 (61 FR 32633-32636).

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William E. Gressman, Office of 
Government Ethics; telephone: 202-208-8000, extension 1110; FAX: 202-
208-8000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the above-noted final rule document 
published by OGE, amendatory instruction 2 inadvertently indicated that 
it was revising portions of paragraph (b) of Sec. 2634.1002 of 5 CFR, 
whereas in fact it was intended to revise portions of paragraph (b) of 
Sec. 2634.1001 of 5 CFR (amendatory instruction 3 revised portions of 
Sec. 2634.1002). This correction document corrects the error in 
amendatory instruction 2.

    Approved: July 2, 1996.
F. Gary Davis,
Deputy Director, Office of Government Ethics.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Office of Government 
Ethics is correcting the June 25, 1996 publication of the final rule on 
Public Financial Disclosure, Conflicts of Interest, and Certificates of 
Divestiture for Executive Branch Officials, which was the subject of FR 
Doc. 96-15970, as follows:
    On page 32635, in the second column, in the first line of 
amendatory instruction 2, the reference to ``Sec. 2634.1002'' is 
corrected to read ``Sec. 2634.1001''.

[FR Doc. 96-17263 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345-01-P
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 158-5 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 3391