```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3592 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3592

   To provide for conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 1996

 Mr. Shuster (for himself, Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Boehlert, and Mr. Borski) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small shoreline protection projects.
Sec. 106. Small snagging and sediment removal project, Mississippi 
                            River, Little Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 107. Small projects for improvement of the environment.
               TITLE II--GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Cost sharing for dredged material disposal areas.
Sec. 202. Flood control policy.
Sec. 203. Feasibility study cost-sharing.
Sec. 204. Restoration of environmental quality.
Sec. 205. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 206. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 207. Recreation policy and user fees.
Sec. 208. Recovery of costs.
Sec. 209. Cost sharing of environmental projects.
Sec. 210. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
                            interests.
Sec. 211. Engineering and environmental innovations of national 
                            significance.
Sec. 212. Lease authority.
Sec. 213. Collaborative research and development.
Sec. 214. Dam safety program.
Sec. 215. Maintenance, rehabilitation, and modernization of facilities.
Sec. 216. Long-term sediment management strategies.
Sec. 217. Dredged material disposal facility partnerships.
Sec. 218. Obstruction removal requirement.
Sec. 219. Small project authorizations.
Sec. 220. Uneconomical cost-sharing requirements.
Sec. 221. Planning assistance to States.
Sec. 222. Corps of Engineers' expenses.
Sec. 223. State and Federal agency review period.
Sec. 224. Limitation on reimbursement of non-Federal costs per project.
Sec. 225. Aquatic plant control.
Sec. 226. Sediments decontamination technology.
Sec. 227. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 228. Support of Army Civil Works Program.
Sec. 229. Benefits to navigation.
Sec. 230. Loss of life prevention.
Sec. 231. Scenic and aesthetic considerations.
Sec. 232. Removal of study prohibitions.
Sec. 233. Sense of Congress; requirement regarding notice.
Sec. 234. Reservoir management technical advisory committee.
Sec. 235. Technical corrections.
                    TITLE III--PROJECT MODIFICATIONS

Sec. 301. Mobile Harbor, Alabama.
Sec. 302. Alamo Dam, Arizona.
Sec. 303. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Arizona.
Sec. 304. Phoenix, Arizona.
Sec. 305. San Francisco River at Clifton, Arizona.
Sec. 306. Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 307. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San Pedro Bay, 
                            California.
Sec. 308. Oakland Harbor, California.
Sec. 309. Queensway Bay, California.
Sec. 310. San Luis Rey, California.
Sec. 311. Thames River, Connecticut.
Sec. 312. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 313. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 314. Central and southern Florida, Canal 51.
Sec. 315. Central and southern Florida, Canal 111 (C-111).
Sec. 316. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Florida.
Sec. 317. Tybee Island, Georgia.
Sec. 318. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 319. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 320. Chicago Lock and Thomas J. O'Brien Lock, Illinois.
Sec. 321. Kaskaskia River, Illinois.
Sec. 322. Locks and Dam 26, Alton, Illinois and Missouri.
Sec. 323. North Branch of Chicago River, Illinois.
Sec. 324. Illinois and Michigan Canal.
Sec. 325. Arkansas City, Kansas.
Sec. 326. Halstead, Kansas.
Sec. 327. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland 
                            River, Kentucky, West Virginia, and 
                            Virginia.
Sec. 328. Comite River, Louisiana.
Sec. 329. Grand Isle and Vicinity, Louisiana.
Sec. 330. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 331. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 332. Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana.
Sec. 333. Red River Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 334. Tolchester Channel, Maryland.
Sec. 335. Saginaw River, Michigan.
Sec. 336. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 337. Stillwater, Minnesota.
Sec. 338. New Madrid Harbor, Missouri.
Sec. 339. Cape Girardeau, Missouri.
Sec. 340. St. John's Bayou--New Madrid Floodway, Missouri.
Sec. 341. Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Park, New Jersey.
Sec. 342. Passaic River, New Jersey.
Sec. 343. Molly Ann's Brook, New Jersey.
Sec. 344. Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, New Jersey and New York.
Sec. 345. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 346. Jones Inlet, New York.
Sec. 347. Kill Van Kull, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 348. Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear River, North Carolina.
Sec. 349. Garrison Dam, North Dakota.
Sec. 350. Wister Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 351. Bonneville Lock and Dam, Columbia River, Oregon and 
                            Washington.
Sec. 352. Columbia River dredging, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 353. Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 354. Mussers Dam, Middle Creek, Snyder County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 355. Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 356. Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 357. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 358. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 359. San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 360. Narragansett, Rhode Island.
Sec. 361. Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.
Sec. 362. Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 363. Upper Jordan River, Utah.
Sec. 364. Haysi Lake, Virginia.
Sec. 365. Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 366. Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 367. East Waterway, Washington.
Sec. 368. Bluestone Lake, West Virginia.
Sec. 369. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 370. Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.
Sec. 371. Teton County, Wyoming.
                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Corps capability study, Alaska.
Sec. 402. McDowell Mountain, Arizona.
Sec. 403. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Arizona.
Sec. 404. Garden Grove, California.
Sec. 405. Mugu Lagoon, California.
Sec. 406. Santa Ynez, California.
Sec. 407. Yolo Bypass, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 408. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 409. Beauty Creek watershed, Valparaiso City, Porter County, 
                            Indiana.
Sec. 410. Grand Calumet River, Hammond, Indiana.
Sec. 411. Indiana Harbor Canal, East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana.
Sec. 412. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 413. Little Calumet River, Indiana.
Sec. 414. Tippecanoe River watershed, Indiana.
Sec. 415. Calcasieu Ship Channel, Hackberry, Louisiana.
Sec. 416. Huron River, Michigan.
Sec. 417. River Des Peres, Saint Louis County, Missouri.
Sec. 418. Saco River, New Hampshire.
Sec. 419. Buffalo River Greenway, New York.
Sec. 420. Port of New York-New Jersey sediment study.
Sec. 421. Port of New York-New Jersey navigation study.
Sec. 422. Chagrin River, Ohio.
Sec. 423. Charleston, South Carolina, estuary.
Sec. 424. Mustang Island, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 425. Prince William County, Virginia.
Sec. 426. Pacific region.
                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 502. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 503. Continuation of authorization of certain projects.
Sec. 504. Land conveyances.
Sec. 505. Namings.
Sec. 506. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 507. Lakes program.
Sec. 508. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 509. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 510. Great Lakes dredged material testing and evaluation manual.
Sec. 511. Great Lakes sediment reduction.
Sec. 512. Great Lakes confined disposal facilities.
Sec. 513. Chesapeake Bay restoration and protection program.
Sec. 514. Extension of jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 515. Alternative to annual passes.
Sec. 516. Recreation partnership initiative.
Sec. 517. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 518. Corps capability to conserve fish and wildlife.
Sec. 519. Periodic beach nourishment.
Sec. 520. Control of aquatic plants.
Sec. 521. New England division headquarters facility.
Sec. 522. Lake Superior Center.
Sec. 523. Earthquake Preparedness Center of Expertise Extension.
Sec. 524. Quarantine facility.
Sec. 525. Benton and Washington Counties, Arkansas.
Sec. 526. Calaveras County, California.
Sec. 527. Prado Dam safety improvements, California.
Sec. 528. Tampa, Florida.
Sec. 529. Watershed management plan for deep river basin, Indiana.
Sec. 530. Southern and eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 531. Louisiana coastal wetlands restoration projects.
Sec. 532. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 533. Restoration projects for Maryland, Pennsylvania, West 
                            Virginia, and Kentucky.
Sec. 534. Beneficial use of dredged material, Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 535. Erosion control measures, Smith Island, Maryland.
Sec. 536. Beneficial use of dredged material, Worton Point, Kent 
                            County, Maryland.
Sec. 537. Duluth, Minnesota, alternative technology project.
Sec. 538. Redwood River basin, Minnesota.
Sec. 539. Natchez Bluffs, Mississippi.
Sec. 540. Sardis Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 541. Cocheco River, New Hampshire.
Sec. 542. Durham, New Hampshire.
Sec. 543. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 544. Authorization of dredge material containment facility for 
                            port of New York/New Jersey.
Sec. 545. Hudson River habitat restoration, New York.
Sec. 546. New York Bight and Harbor Study.
Sec. 547. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 548. New York City Watershed.
Sec. 549. Northeastern Ohio.
Sec. 550. Grand Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 551. Broad top region of Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Hopper Dredge McFarland.
Sec. 553. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 554. Seven Points Visitors Center, Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 555. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 556. Blackstone River Valley, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.
Sec. 557. East Ridge, Tennessee.
Sec. 558. Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Sec. 559. Buffalo Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 560. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 561. Pierce County, Washington.
Sec. 562. Huntington, West Virginia.
Sec. 563. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 564. Evaluation of beach material.
Sec. 565. Ohio River Greenway.
Sec. 566. Sense of Congress regarding St. Lawrence Seaway tolls.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the 
Secretary of the Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as provided in this section, the following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports designated in this section:
            (1) Santa barbara harbor, california.--The project for 
        navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $5,840,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,670,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $1,170,000.
            (2) San lorenzo river, santa cruz, california.--The project 
        for flood control, San Lorenzo River, Santa Cruz, California: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a 
        total cost of $16,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $8,570,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,330,000.
            (3) Marin county shoreline, san rafael, california.--The 
        project for storm damage reduction, Marin County shoreline, San 
        Rafael, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        January 28, 1994, at a total cost of $28,300,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $18,400,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $9,900,000.
            (4) Humboldt harbor and bay, california.--The project for 
        navigation, Humboldt Harbor and Bay, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated October 30, 1995, at a total cost of 
        $15,180,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,000,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,180,000.
            (5) Anacostia river and tributaries, district of columbia 
        and maryland.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Anacostia River and Tributaries, District of Columbia and 
        Maryland: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated November 15, 
        1994, at a total cost of $17,144,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $12,858,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $4,286,000.
            (6) Atlantic intracoastal waterway, st. johns county, 
        florida.--The project for navigation, Atlantic Intracoastal 
        Waterway, St. Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of 
        $15,881,000. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation shall be a non-Federal responsibility and the 
        non-Federal interest must assume ownership of the bridge.
            (7) Lake michigan, illinois.--The project for storm damage 
        reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Lake Michigan, 
        Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana 
        State line: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 
        1994, at a total cost of $204,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $110,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $94,000,000. The project shall include the breakwater near 
        the South Water Filtration Plant described in the report as a 
        separate element of the project, at a total cost of 
        $11,470,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,460,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,010,000.
            (8) Kentucky lock and dam, tennessee river, kentucky.--The 
        project for navigation, Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, 
        at a total cost of $393,200,000. The costs of construction of 
        the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from 
        the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (9) Pond creek, jefferson county, kentucky.--The project 
        for flood control, Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Kentucky: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a 
        total cost of $16,080,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $10,993,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,087,000.
            (10) Wolf creek dam and lake cumberland, kentucky.--The 
        project for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 
        1994, at a total cost of $53,763,000, with an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $53,763,000. Funds derived by the Tennessee 
        Valley Authority from its power program and funds derived from 
        any private or public entity designated by the Southeastern 
        Power Administration may be used to pay all or part of the 
        costs of the project.
            (11) Port fourchon, lafourche parish, louisiana.--A project 
        for navigation, Belle Pass and Bayou Lafourche, Louisiana: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 7, 1995, at a 
        total cost of $4,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $2,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000.
            (12) West bank of the mississippi river, new orleans (east 
        of harvey canal), louisiana.--The project for hurricane damage 
        reduction, West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity 
        of New Orleans (East of Harvey Canal), Louisiana: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of 
        $126,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $82,200,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $43,800,000.
            (13) Wood river, grand island, nebraska.--The project for 
        flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $11,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,040,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,760,000.
            (14) Long beach island, new york.--The project for storm 
        damage reduction, Long Beach Island, New York: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated April 5, 1996, at a total cost of 
        $72,090,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,858,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $25,232,000.
            (15) Wilmington harbor, cape fear river, north carolina.--
        The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, Cape Fear and 
        Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North Carolina: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $23,953,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,032,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,921,000.
            (16) Duck creek, cincinnati, ohio.--The project for flood 
        control, Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,947,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $11,960,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,987,000.
            (17) Willamette river temperature control, mckenzie 
        subbasin, oregon.--The project for environmental restoration, 
        Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
        Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 1, 
        1996, at a total cost of $38,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $38,000,000.
            (18) Rio grande de arecibo, puerto rico.--The project for 
        flood control, Rio Grande de Arecibo, Puerto Rico: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated April 5, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $19,951,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,557,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,394,000.
            (19) Big sioux river and skunk creek, sioux falls, south 
        dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux River and 
        Skunk Creek, Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $34,600,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $25,900,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $8,700,000.
            (20) Watertown, south dakota.--The project for flood 
        control, Watertown and Vicinity, South Dakota: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated August 31, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $18,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,200,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,800,000.
            (21) Houston-galveston navigation channels, texas.--The 
        project for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-
        Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated May 9, 1996, at a total initial construction 
        cost of $292,797,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $210,891,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $81,906,000. 
        The project shall include deferred construction of additional 
        environmental restoration features over the life of the 
        project, at a total average annual cost of $786,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $590,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
        cost of $196,000. The construction of berthing areas and the 
        removal of pipelines and other obstructions that are necessary 
        for the project shall be accomplished at non-Federal expense. 
        Non-Federal interests shall receive credit toward cash 
        contributions required during construction and subsequent to 
        construction for design and construction management work that 
        is performed by non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
        determines is necessary to implement the project.
            (22) Marmet lock, kanawha river, west virginia.--The 
        project for navigation, Marmet Lock, Kanawha River, West 
        Virginia: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 
        1994, at a total cost of $229,581,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 
        In conducting any real estate acquisition activities with 
        respect to the project, the Secretary shall give priority 
        consideration to those individuals who would be directly 
        affected by any physical displacement due to project design and 
        shall consider the financial circumstances of such individuals. 
        The Secretary shall proceed with real estate acquisition in 
        connection with the project expeditiously.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) Project Descriptions.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
each of the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible, shall carry out the project under section 205 
of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Wares creek, manatee county, florida.--Project for 
        flood control, Wares Creek, Manatee County, Florida; except 
        that the maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allotted 
        for the project shall be $10,385,000.
            (2) Birds, lawrence county, illinois.--Project for flood 
        control, Birds, Lawrence County, Illinois.
            (3) Bridgeport, lawrence county, illinois.--Project for 
        flood control, Bridgeport, Lawrence County, Illinois.
            (4) Embarras river, villa grove, illinois.--Project for 
        flood control, Embarras River, Villa Grove, Illinois.
            (5) Frankfort, will county, illinois.--Project for flood 
        control, Frankfort, Will County, Illinois.
            (6) Sumner, lawrence county, illinois.--Project for flood 
        control, Sumner, Lawrence County, Illinois.
            (7) Vermillion river, demanade park, lafayette, 
        louisiana.--Project for nonstructural flood control, Vermillion 
        River, Demanade Park, Lafayette, Louisiana. In carrying out the 
        study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the 
        Secretary shall use relevant information from the Lafayette 
        Parish feasibility study and expedite completion of the study 
        under this paragraph.
            (8) Vermillion river, quail hollow subdivision, lafayette, 
        louisiana.--Project for nonstructural flood control, Vermillion 
        River, Quail Hollow Subdivision, Lafayette, Louisiana. In 
        carrying out the study and the project (if any) under this 
        paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant information from 
        the Lafayette Parish feasibility study and expedite completion 
        of the study under this paragraph.
            (9) Kawkawlin river, bay county, michigan.--Project for 
        flood control, Kawkawlin River, Bay County, Michigan.
            (10) Whitney drain, arenac county, michigan.--Project for 
        flood control, Whitney Drain, Arenac County, Michigan.
            (11) Festus and crystal city, missouri.--Project for flood 
        control, Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. In carrying out the 
        study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the 
        Secretary shall use relevant information from the existing 
        reconnaissance study and shall expedite completion of the study 
        under this paragraph.
            (12) Kimmswick, missouri.--Project for flood control, 
        Kimmswick, Missouri. In carrying out the study and the project 
        (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant 
        information from the existing reconnaissance study and shall 
        expedite completion of the study under this paragraph.
            (13) Buffalo creek, erie county, new york.--Project for 
        flood control, Buffalo Creek, Erie County, New York.
            (14) Cazenovia creek, erie county, new york.--Project for 
        flood control, Cazenovia Creek, Erie County, New York.
            (15) Cheektowaga, erie county, new york.--Project for flood 
        control, Cheektowaga, Erie County, New York.
            (16) Fulmer creek, village of mohawk, new york.--Project 
        for flood control, Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, New York.
            (17) Moyer creek, village of frankfort, new york.--Project 
        for flood control, Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, New York.
            (18) Sauquoit creek, whitesboro, new york.--Project for 
        flood control, Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, New York.
            (19) Steele creek, village of ilion, new york.--Project for 
        flood control, Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, New York.
            (20) Willamette river, oregon.--Project for nonstructural 
        flood control, Willamette River, Oregon, including floodplain 
        and ecosystem restoration.
            (21) Wills creek, hyndman, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Wills Creek, Borough of Hyndman, Pennsylvania. The 
        Secretary shall reevaluate the project taking into 
        consideration recent flooding and shall use relevant 
        information from previous studies to expedite the project. In 
        evaluating and implementing the project, the Secretary shall 
        allow non-Federal interests to participate in financing of the 
        project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 to the extent that the 
        Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
        necessary to implement the project.
            (22) Neabsco creek watershed, virginia.--Project for flood 
        control, Neabsco Creek Watershed, Prince William County, 
        Virginia. In evaluating and implementing the project, the 
        Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate 
        in financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to the extent 
        that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such 
        section is necessary to implement the project.
            (23) Greenbrier river basin, west virginia.--Project for 
        flood control, consisting of an early flood warning system, 
        Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia.
    (b) Cost Allocations.--
            (1) Lake elsinore, california.--The maximum amount of 
        Federal funds that may be allotted under section 205 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) for the project for 
        flood control, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, 
        shall be $7,500,000.
            (2) Lost creek, columbus, nebraska.--The maximum amount of 
        Federal funds that may be allotted under such section 205 for 
        the project for flood control, Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebraska, 
        shall be $5,500,000.
            (3) Revision of project cooperation agreement.--The 
        Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
        the projects referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) in order to 
        take into account the change in the Federal participation in 
        such projects pursuant to such paragraphs.
            (4) Cost sharing.--Nothing in this subsection shall be 
        construed to affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to 
        the project referred to in paragraph (1) under the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
shall carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Allegheny river at oil city, pennsylvania.--Project for 
        bank stabilization to address erosion problems affecting the 
        pipeline crossing the Allegheny River at Oil City, 
        Pennsylvania, including measures to address erosion affecting 
        the pipeline in the bed of the Allegheny River and its adjacent 
        banks.
            (2) Cumberland river, nashville, tennessee.--Project for 
        bank stabilization, Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
            (3) Tennessee river, hamilton county, tennessee.--Project 
        for bank stabilization, Tennessee River, Hamilton County, 
        Tennessee; except that the maximum amount of Federal funds that 
        may be allotted for the project shall be $7,500,000.

SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
shall carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor 
Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Akutan, alaska.--Project for navigation, Akutan, 
        Alaska, consisting of a bulkhead and a wave barrier, including 
        application of innovative technology involving use of a 
        permeable breakwater.
            (2) Grand marais harbor breakwater, michigan.--Project for 
        navigation, Grand Marais Harbor breakwater, Michigan.
            (3) Duluth, minnesota.--Project for navigation, Duluth, 
        Minnesota.
            (4) Taconite, minnesota.--Project for navigation, Taconite, 
        Minnesota.
            (5) Two harbors, minnesota.--Project for navigation, Two 
        Harbors, Minnesota.
            (6) Caruthersville harbor, pemiscot county, missouri.--
        Project for navigation, Caruthersville Harbor, Pemiscot County, 
        Missouri, including enlargement of the existing harbor and bank 
        stabilization measures.
            (7) New madrid county harbor, missouri.--Project for 
        navigation, New Madrid County Harbor, Missouri, including 
        enlargement of the existing harbor and bank stabilization 
        measures.
            (8) Brooklyn, new york.--Project for navigation, Brooklyn, 
        New York, including restoration of the pier and related 
        navigation support structures, at the Sixty-Ninth Street Pier.
            (9) Buffalo inner harbor, buffalo, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Buffalo Inner Harbor, Buffalo, New York.
            (10) Union ship canal, buffalo and lackawanna, new york.--
        Project for navigation, Union Ship Canal, Buffalo and 
        Lackawanna, New York.

SEC. 105. SMALL SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    (a) Project Authorizations.--The Secretary shall conduct a study 
for each of the following projects, and if the Secretary determines 
that the project is feasible, shall carry out the project under section 
3 of the Shoreline Protection Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g):
            (1) Faulkner's island, connecticut.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Faulkner's Island, Connecticut; except that the 
        maximum amount of Federal funds that may be allotted for the 
        project shall be $4,500,000.
            (2) Fort pierce, florida.--Project for 1 mile of additional 
        shoreline protection, Fort Pierce, Florida.
            (3) Sylvan beach breakwater, town of verona, oneida county, 
        new york.--Project for shoreline protection, Sylvan Beach 
        Breakwater, town of Verona, Oneida County, New York.
    (b) Cost Sharing Agreement.--In carrying out the project authorized 
by subsection (a)(1), the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with 
the property owner to determine allocation of the project costs.

SEC. 106. SMALL SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT, MISSISSIPPI 
              RIVER, LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for snagging and 
sediment removal, Mississippi River, Little Falls, Minnesota, and, if 
the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall carry out 
the project under section 3 of the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 
1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a; 59 Stat. 23).

SEC. 107. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
appropriate, shall carry out the project under section 1135(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309(a)):
            (1) Upper truckee river, el dorado county, california.--
        Project for environmental restoration, Upper Truckee River, El 
        Dorado County, California, including measures for restoration 
        of degraded wetlands and wildlife enhancement.
            (2) Upper jordan river, salt lake county, utah.--Project 
        for channel restoration and environmental improvement, Upper 
        Jordan River, Salt Lake County, Utah.

               TITLE II--GENERALLY APPLICABLE PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. COST SHARING FOR DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREAS.

    (a) Construction.--Section 101(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a); 100 Stat. 4082-4083) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking the last sentence of paragraph (2) and 
        inserting the following: ``The value of lands, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations provided under paragraph (3) and 
        the costs of relocations borne by the non-Federal interests 
        under paragraph (4) shall be credited toward the payment 
        required under this paragraph.'';
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and'' after ``rights-of-way,'';
                    (B) by striking ``, and dredged material disposal 
                areas''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``, including any lands, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations (other than 
                utility relocations accomplished under paragraph (4)) 
                that are necessary for dredged material disposal 
                facilities'' before the period at the end of such 
                paragraph; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Dredged material disposal facilities for project 
        construction.--For purposes of this subsection, the term 
        `general navigation features' includes constructed land-based 
        and aquatic dredged material disposal facilities that are 
        necessary for the disposal of dredged material and for project 
        construction.''.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--Section 101(b) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2211(b); 100 Stat. 4083) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1) In general.--'' before ``The 
        Federal'';
            (2) by indenting and moving paragraph (1), as designated by 
        paragraph (1) of this subsection, 2 ems to the right;
            (3) by striking ``pursuant to this Act'' and inserting ``by 
        the Secretary pursuant to this Act or any other law approved 
        after the date of the enactment of this Act''; and
            (4) by adding at the end thereof the following:
            ``(2) Dredged material disposal facilities.--The Federal 
        share of the cost of constructing land-based and aquatic 
        dredged material disposal facilities that are necessary for the 
        disposal of dredged material required for the operation and 
        maintenance of a project and for which a contract for 
        construction has not been awarded on or before the date of the 
        enactment of this paragraph shall be determined in accordance 
        with subsection (a). The Federal share of operating and 
        maintaining such facilities shall be determined in accordance 
        with paragraph (1).''.
    (c) Agreement.--Section 101(e)(1) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
2211(e)(1); 100 Stat. 4083) is amended by striking ``and to provide 
dredged material disposal areas and perform'' and inserting ``including 
those necessary for dredged material disposal facilities, and to 
perform''.
    (d) Consideration of Funding Requirements and Equitable 
Apportionment.--Section 101 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2211; 100 Stat. 
4082-4084) is further amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Consideration of Funding Requirements and Equitable 
Apportionment.--The Secretary shall ensure, to the extent practicable, 
that funding necessary for operation and maintenance dredging of 
commercial navigation harbors is provided before Federal funds are 
obligated for payment of the Federal share of costs associated with 
construction of dredged material disposal facilities in accordance with 
subsections (a) and (b) and that funds expended for such construction 
are equitably apportioned in accordance with regional needs.''.
    (e) Eligible Operations and Maintenance Defined.--Section 214(2)(A) 
of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2241; 100 Stat. 4108) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``Federal'' after ``means all'';
            (2) by inserting ``(i)'' after ``including''; and
            (3) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``(ii) the construction of dredged material disposal 
        facilities that are necessary for the operation and maintenance 
        of any harbor or inland harbor; (iii) dredging and disposing of 
        contaminated sediments which are in or which affect the 
        maintenance of Federal navigation channels; (iv) mitigating for 
        impacts resulting from Federal navigation operation and 
        maintenance activities; and (v) operating and maintaining 
        dredged material disposal facilities''.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 210 of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2238; 100 Stat. 4106) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Trust Fund.--'';
            (2) by striking ``1954'' and inserting ``1986''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (b).

SEC. 202. FLOOD CONTROL POLICY.

    (a) Flood Control Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Increased non-federal contributions.--Subsections (a) 
        and (b) of section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a) and (b)) are each amended by 
        striking ``25 percent'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``35 percent''.
            (2) Applicability.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to projects authorized after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act.
    (b) Ability To Pay.--
            (1) In general.--Section 103(m) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
        2213(m)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(m) Ability To Pay.--
            ``(1) In general.--Any cost-sharing agreement under this 
        section for flood control or agricultural water supply shall be 
        subject to the ability of a non-Federal interest to pay.
            ``(2) Criteria and procedures.--The ability of any non-
        Federal interest to pay shall be determined by the Secretary in 
        accordance with criteria and procedures in effect on the day 
        before the date of the enactment of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996; except that such criteria and 
        procedures shall be revised within 6 months after the date of 
        such enactment to reflect the requirements of paragraph (3).
            ``(3) Revision of procedures.--In revising procedures 
        pursuant to paragraph (1), the Secretary--
                    ``(A) shall consider--
                            ``(i) per capita income data for the county 
                        or counties in which the project is to be 
                        located; and
                            ``(ii) the per capita non-Federal cost of 
                        construction of the project for the county or 
                        counties in which the project is to be located;
                    ``(B) shall not consider criteria (other than 
                criteria described in subparagraph (A)) in effect on 
                the day before the date of the enactment of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1996; and
                    ``(C) may consider additional criteria relating to 
                the non-Federal interest's financial ability to carry 
                out its cost-sharing responsibilities, to the extent 
                that the application of such criteria does not 
                eliminate areas from eligibility for a reduction in the 
                non-Federal share as determined under subparagraph (A).
            ``(4) Non-federal share.--Notwithstanding section 103(a), 
        the Secretary shall reduce or eliminate the requirement that a 
        non-Federal interest make a cash contribution for any project 
        that is determined to be eligible for a reduction in the non-
        Federal share under procedures in effect under paragraphs (1), 
        (2), and (3).''.
            (2) Applicability.--
                    (A) Generally.--Subject to subparagraph (C), the 
                amendment made by paragraph (1) shall apply to any 
                project, or separable element thereof, with respect to 
which the Secretary and the non-Federal interest have not entered into 
a project cooperation agreement on or before the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                    (B) Amendment of cooperation agreement.--If 
                requested by the non-Federal interest, the Secretary 
                shall amend a project cooperation agreement executed on 
                or before the date of the enactment of this Act to 
                reflect the application of the amendment made by 
                paragraph (1) for any project for which a contract for 
                construction has not been awarded on or before such 
                date of enactment.
                    (C) Non-federal option.--If requested by the non-
                Federal interest, the Secretary shall apply the 
                criteria and procedures established pursuant to section 
                103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                as in effect on the day before the date of the 
                enactment of this Act for projects that are authorized 
                before the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Flood Plain Management Plans.--
            (1) In general.--Section 402 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-
        12; 100 Stat. 4133) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 402. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.

    ``(a) Compliance With Flood Plain Management and Insurance 
Programs.--Before construction of any project for local flood 
protection or any project for hurricane or storm damage reduction and 
involving Federal assistance from the Secretary, the non-Federal 
interest shall agree to participate in and comply with applicable 
Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs.
    ``(b) Flood Plain Management Plans.--Within 1 year after the date 
of signing a project cooperation agreement for construction of a 
project to which subsection (a) applies, the non-Federal interest shall 
prepare a flood plain management plan designed to reduce the impacts of 
future flood events in the project area. Such plan shall be implemented 
by the non-Federal interest not later than 1 year after completion of 
construction of the project.
    ``(c) Guidelines.--
            ``(1) In general.--Within 6 months after the date of the 
        enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall develop 
        guidelines for preparation of flood plain management plans by 
        non-Federal interests under subsection (b). Such guidelines 
        shall address potential measures, practices and policies to 
        reduce loss of life, injuries, damages to property and 
        facilities, public expenditures, and other adverse impacts 
        associated with flooding and to preserve and enhance natural 
        flood plain values.
            ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in 
        this subsection shall be construed to confer any regulatory 
        authority upon the Secretary.
    ``(d) Technical Support.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 
technical support to a non-Federal interest for a project to which 
subsection (a) applies for the development and implementation of plans 
prepared under subsection (b).''.
            (2) Applicability.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) 
        shall apply to any project or separable element thereof with 
        respect to which the Secretary and the non-Federal interest 
        have not entered into a project cooperation agreement on or 
        before the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Non-Structural Flood Control Policy.--
            (1) Review.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of 
        policies, procedures, and techniques relating to the evaluation 
        and development of flood control measures with a view toward 
        identifying impediments that may exist to justifying non-
        structural flood control measures as alternatives to structural 
        measures.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the findings on the review conducted under this 
        subsection, together with any recommendations for modifying 
        existing law to remove any impediments identified under such 
        review.
    (e) Emergency Response.--Section 5(a)(1) of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved August 
18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n(a)(1)), is amended by inserting before the 
first semicolon the following: ``, or in implementation of 
nonstructural alternatives to the repair or restoration of such flood 
control work if requested by the non-Federal sponsor''.

SEC. 203. FEASIBILITY STUDY COST-SHARING.

    (a) Non-Federal Share.--Section 105(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``during the period 
        of such study'';
            (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following: 
        ``During the period of the study, the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of the study shall be not more than 50 percent of the 
estimate of the cost of the study as contained in the feasibility cost-
sharing agreement. The cost estimate may be amended only by mutual 
agreement of the Secretary and the non-Federal interests. The non-
Federal share of any costs in excess of the cost estimate shall, except 
as otherwise mutually agreed by the Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests, be payable after the project has been authorized for 
construction and on the date on which the Secretary and non-Federal 
interests enter into an agreement pursuant to section 101(e) or 103(j). 
In the event the project which is the subject of the study is not 
authorized within the earlier of 5 years of the date of the final 
report of the Chief of Engineers concerning such study or 2 years of 
the date of termination of the study, the non-Federal share of any such 
excess costs shall be paid to the United States on the last day of such 
period.''; and
            (3) in the second sentence, by striking ``such non-Federal 
        contribution'' and inserting ``the non-Federal share required 
        under this paragraph''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply notwithstanding any feasibility cost-sharing agreement entered 
into by the Secretary and non-Federal interests. Upon request of the 
non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall amend any feasibility cost-
sharing agreements in effect on the date of enactment of this Act so as 
to conform the agreements with the amendments.
    (c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section 
or any amendment made by this section shall require the Secretary to 
reimburse the non-Federal interests for funds previously contributed 
for a study.

SEC. 204. RESTORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.

    (a) Review of Projects.--Section 1135(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``the operation of''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``and to determine if the operation of such projects 
        has contributed to the degradation of the quality of the 
        environment''.
    (b) Program of Projects.--Section 1135(b) of such Act is amended by 
striking the last 2 sentences of subsection (b).
    (c) Restoration of Environmental Quality.--Section 1135 of such Act 
is further amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(c) Restoration of Environmental Quality.--If the Secretary 
determines that construction of a water resource project by the 
Secretary or operation of a water resources project constructed by the 
Secretary has contributed to the degradation of the quality of the 
environment, the Secretary may undertake measures for restoration of 
environmental quality and measures for enhancement of environmental 
quality that are associated with the restoration, either through 
modifications at the project site or at other locations that have been 
affected by the construction or operation of the project, if such 
measures do not conflict with the authorized project purposes.
    ``(d) Non-Federal Share; Limitation on Maximum Federal 
Expenditure.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any modifications or 
measures carried out or undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) of 
this section shall be 25 percent. Not more than 80 percent of the non-
Federal share may be in kind, including a facility, supply, or service 
that is necessary to carry out the modification. No more than 
$5,000,000 in Federal funds may be expended on any single modification 
or measure carried out or undertaken pursuant to this section.''; and
            (3) in subsection (f), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``program conducted under subsection (b)'' and inserting 
        ``programs conducted under subsections (b) and (c)''.
    (d) Definition.--Section 1135 of such Act is further amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Definition.--In this section the term `water resources 
project constructed by the Secretary' includes a water resources 
project constructed or funded jointly by the Secretary and the head of 
any other Federal agency (including the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service).''.

SEC. 205. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4639-4640) is amended--
            (1) in each of subsections (a), (b), and (c) by inserting 
        ``and remediate'' after ``remove'' each place it appears;
            (2) in subsection (b)(1) by inserting ``and remediation'' 
        after ``removal'' each place it appears;
            (3) in subsection (b)(2) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000''; and
            (4) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall give 
priority to work in the following areas:
            ``(1) Brooklyn Waterfront, New York.
            ``(2) Buffalo Harbor and River, New York.
            ``(3) Ashtabula River, Ohio.
            ``(4) Mahoning River, Ohio.
            ``(5) Lower Fox River, Wisconsin.''.

SEC. 206. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) General Authority.--The Secretary is authorized to carry out 
aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects when the 
Secretary determines that such projects will improve the quality of the 
environment and are in the public interest and that the environmental 
and economic benefits, both monetary and nonmonetary, of the project to 
be undertaken pursuant to this section justify the cost.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Non-Federal interests shall provide 50 percent 
of the cost of construction of any project carried out under this 
section, including provision of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
and necessary relocations.
    (c) Agreements.--Construction of a project under this section shall 
be initiated only after a non-Federal interest has entered into a 
binding agreement with the Secretary to pay the non-Federal share of 
the costs of construction required by this section and to pay 100 
percent of any operation, maintenance, and replacement and 
rehabilitation costs with respect to the project in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
    (d) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may 
be allotted under this section for a project at any single locality.
    (e) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated not to exceed 
$25,000,000 annually to carry out this section.

SEC. 207. RECREATION POLICY AND USER FEES.

    (a) Recreation Policies.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide increased 
        emphasis on and opportunities for recreation at water resources 
        projects operated, maintained, or constructed by the Corps of 
        Engineers.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on specific measures taken to implement this 
        subsection.
    (b) Recreation User Fees.--Section 210(b) of the Flood Control Act 
of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(5) Use of fees collected at facility.--Subject to 
        advance appropriations, the Secretary of the Army shall ensure 
        that at least an amount equal to the total amount of fees 
        collected at any project under this subsection in a fiscal year 
        beginning after September 30, 1996, are expended in the 
        succeeding fiscal year at such project for operation and 
        maintenance of recreational facilities at such project.''.

SEC. 208. RECOVERY OF COSTS.

    Amounts recovered under section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 
U.S.C. 9607) for any response action taken by the Secretary in support 
of the Army Civil Works program and any other amounts recovered by the 
Secretary from a contractor, insurer, surety, or other person to 
reimburse the Army for any expenditure for environmental response 
activities in support of the Army civil works program shall be credited 
to the appropriate trust fund account from which the cost of such 
response action has been paid or will be charged.

SEC. 209. COST SHARING OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(7) subject to section 906 of this Act, environmental 
        protection and restoration: 50 percent.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
only to projects authorized after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 210. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    (a) Authority.--Non-Federal interests are authorized to undertake 
flood control projects in the United States, subject to obtaining any 
permits required pursuant to Federal and State laws in advance of 
actual construction.
    (b) Studies and Design Activities.--
            (1) By non-federal interests.--A non-Federal interest may 
        prepare, for review and approval by the Secretary, the 
        necessary studies and design documents for any construction to 
        be undertaken pursuant to subsection (a).
            (2) By secretary.--Upon request of an appropriate non-
        Federal interest, the Secretary may undertake all necessary 
        studies and design activities for any construction to be 
        undertaken pursuant to subsection (a) and provide technical 
        assistance in obtaining all necessary permits for such 
construction if the non-Federal interest contracts with the Secretary 
to furnish the United States funds for the studies and design 
activities during the period that the studies and design activities 
will be conducted.
    (c) Completion of Studies and Design Activities.--In the case of 
any study or design documents for a flood control project that were 
initiated before the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
is authorized to complete and transmit to the appropriate non-Federal 
interests the study or design documents or, upon the request of such 
non-Federal interests, to terminate the study or design activities and 
transmit the partially completed study or design documents to such non-
Federal interests for completion. Studies and design documents subject 
to this subsection shall be completed without regard to the 
requirements of subsection (b).
    (d) Authority To Carry Out Improvement.--
            (1) In general.--Any non-Federal interest which has 
        received from the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) a 
        favorable recommendation to carry out a flood control project 
        or separable element thereof based on the results of completed 
        studies and design documents for the project or element, may 
        carry out the project or element if a final environmental 
        impact statement has been filed for the project or element.
            (2) Permits.--Any plan of improvement proposed to be 
        implemented in accordance with this subsection shall be deemed 
        to satisfy the requirements for obtaining the appropriate 
        permits required under the Secretary's authority and such 
        permits shall be granted subject to the non-Federal interest's 
        acceptance of the terms and conditions of such permits if the 
        Secretary determines that the applicable regulatory criteria 
        and procedures have been satisfied.
            (3) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall monitor any project 
        for which a permit is granted under this subsection in order to 
        ensure that such project is constructed, operated, and 
        maintained in accordance with the terms and conditions of such 
        permit.
    (e) Reimbursement.--
            (1) General rule.--Subject to appropriation Acts, the 
        Secretary is authorized to reimburse any non-Federal interest 
        an amount equal to the estimate of the Federal share, without 
        interest, of the cost of any authorized flood control project, 
        or separable element thereof, constructed pursuant to this 
        section--
                    (A) if, after authorization and before initiation 
                of construction of the project or separable element, 
                the Secretary approves the plans for construction of 
                such project by the non-Federal interest; and
                    (B) if the Secretary finds, after a review of 
                studies and design documents prepared pursuant to this 
                section, that construction of the project or separable 
                element is economically justified and environmentally 
                acceptable.
            (2) Matters to be considered in reviewing plans.--In 
        reviewing plans under this subsection, the Secretary shall 
        consider budgetary and programmatic priorities and other 
        factors that the Secretary deems appropriate.
            (3) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall regularly monitor and 
        audit any project for flood control approved for construction 
        under this section by a non-Federal interest in order to ensure 
        that such construction is in compliance with the plans approved 
        by the Secretary and that the costs are reasonable.
            (4) Limitation on reimbursements.--No reimbursement shall 
        be made under this section unless and until the Secretary has 
        certified that the work for which reimbursement is requested 
        has been performed in accordance with applicable permits and 
        approved plans.
    (f) Specific Projects.--For the purpose of demonstrating the 
potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of 
flood control projects, the Secretary shall enter into agreements 
pursuant to this section with non-Federal interests for development of 
the following flood control projects by such interests:
            (1) Brays bayou, texas.--Flood control components 
        comprising the Brays Bayou element of the project for flood 
        control, Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Texas, authorized by 
        section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1990 (104 Stat. 4610); except that the non-Federal interest may 
        design and construct an alternative to the diversion component 
        of such element.
            (2) Hunting bayou, texas.--The Hunting Bayou element of the 
        project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, 
        Texas, authorized by such section; except that the non-Federal 
        interest may design and construct an alternative to such 
        element.
            (3) White oak bayou, texas.--The project for flood control, 
        White Oak Bayou watershed, Texas.
    (g) Treatment of Flood Damage Prevention Measures.--For the 
purposes of this section, flood damage prevention measures at or in the 
vicinity of Morgan City and Berwick, Louisiana, shall be treated as an 
authorized element of the Atchafalaya Basin feature of the project for 
flood control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.

SEC. 211. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATIONS OF NATIONAL 
              SIGNIFICANCE.

    (a) Surveys, Plans, and Studies.--To encourage innovative and 
environmentally sound engineering solutions and innovative 
environmental solutions to problems of national significance, the 
Secretary may undertake surveys, plans, and studies and prepare reports 
which may lead to work under existing civil works authorities or to 
recommendations for authorizations.
    (b) Funding.--
            (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for 
        each fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1996.
            (2) Funding from other sources.--The Secretary may accept 
        and expend additional funds from other Federal agencies, 
        States, or non-Federal entities for purposes of carrying out 
        this section.

SEC. 212. LEASE AUTHORITY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may lease 
space available in buildings for which funding for construction or 
purchase was provided from the revolving fund established by the 1st 
section of the Civil Functions Appropriations Act, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 576; 
67 Stat. 199) under such terms and conditions as are acceptable to the 
Secretary. The proceeds from such leases shall be credited to the 
revolving fund for the purposes set forth in such Act.

SEC. 213. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) Funding From Other Federal Sources.--Section 7 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4022-4023) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``civil works'' before 
        ``mission''; and
            (2) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:
    ``(e) Funding From Other Federal Sources.--The Secretary may accept 
and expend additional funds from other Federal programs, including 
other Department of Defense programs, to carry out the purposes of this 
section.''.
    (b) Pre-Agreement Temporary Protection of Technology.--Such section 
7 is further amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) Pre-Agreement Temporary Protection of Technology.--
            ``(1) In general.--If the Secretary determines that 
        information developed as a result of research and development 
        activities conducted by the Corps of Engineers is likely to be 
        subject to a cooperative research and development agreement 
        within 2 years of its development and that such information 
        would be a trade secret or commercial or financial information 
        that would be privileged or confidential if the information had 
        been obtained from a non-Federal party participating in a 
        cooperative research and development agreement under section 12 
        of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, the 
        Secretary may provide appropriate protection against the 
        dissemination of such information, including exemption from 
        subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, 
        until the earlier of the date the Secretary enters into such an 
        agreement with respect to such technology or the last day of 
        the 2-year period beginning on the date of such determination.
            ``(2) Treatment.--Any technology covered by this section 
        which becomes the subject of a cooperative research and 
        development agreement shall be accorded the protection provided 
        under section 12(c)(7)(B) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 
        3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if such technology had been developed under 
        a cooperative research and development agreement.''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by striking 
        ``(b)'' and inserting ``(c)''.

SEC. 214. DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.

    Section 13 of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the Secretary 
of the Army to undertake a national program of inspection of dams'', 
approved August 8, 1972 (33 U.S.C. 467l; Public Law 92-367), is amended 
by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: ``There is 
authorized to be appropriated $500,000 for each fiscal year for the 
purpose of carrying out this section.''.

SEC. 215. MAINTENANCE, REHABILITATION, AND MODERNIZATION OF FACILITIES.

    In accomplishing the maintenance, rehabilitation, and modernization 
of hydroelectric power generating facilities at water resources 
projects under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army, the 
Secretary is authorized to increase the efficiency of energy production 
and the capacity of these facilities if, after consulting with other 
appropriate Federal and State agencies, the Secretary determines that 
such uprating--
            (1) is economically justified and financially feasible;
            (2) will not result in significant adverse effects on the 
        other purposes for which the project is authorized;
            (3) will not result in significant adverse environmental 
        impacts; and
            (4) will not involve major structural or operation changes 
        in the project.

SEC. 216. LONG-TERM SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall enter into cooperative 
agreements with non-Federal sponsors of navigation projects for 
development of long-term management strategies for controlling 
sediments in such projects.
    (b) Contents of Strategies.--Each strategy developed under this 
section for a navigation project--
            (1) shall include assessments of the following with respect 
        to the project: sediment rates and composition, sediment 
        reduction options, dredging practices, long-term management of 
        any dredged material disposal facilities, remediation of such 
        facilities, and alternative disposal and reuse options;
            (2) shall include a timetable for implementation of the 
        strategy; and
            (3) shall incorporate, as much as possible, relevant 
        ongoing planning efforts, including remedial action planning, 
        dredged material management planning, harbor and waterfront 
        development planning, and watershed management planning.
    (c) Consultation.--In developing strategies under this section, the 
Secretary shall consult with interested Federal agencies, States, and 
Indian tribes and provide an opportunity for public comment.

SEC. 217. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITY PARTNERSHIPS.

    (a) Additional Capacity.--
            (1) Provided by secretary.--At the request of a non-Federal 
        project sponsor, the Secretary may provide additional capacity 
        at a dredged material disposal facility constructed by the 
        Department of the Army beyond that which would be required for 
        project purposes if the non-Federal project sponsor agrees to 
        pay, during the period of construction, all costs associated 
        with the construction of the additional capacity.
            (2) Cost recovery authority.--The non-Federal project 
        sponsor may recover the costs assigned to the additional 
        capacity through fees assessed on 3rd parties whose dredged 
        material is deposited in the facility and who enter into 
        agreements with the non-Federal sponsor for the use of such 
        facility. The amount of such fees may be determined by the non-
        Federal sponsor.
    (b) Non-Federal use of Disposal Facilities.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary--
                    (A) may permit the use of any dredged material 
                disposal facility under the jurisdiction of, or managed 
                by, the Secretary by a non-Federal interest if the 
                Secretary determines that such use will not reduce the 
                availability of the facility for project purposes; and
                    (B) may impose fees to recover capital, operation, 
                and maintenance costs associated with such use.
            (2) Use of fees.--Notwithstanding section 401(c) of the 
        Federal Water Pollution Control Act but subject to advance 
        appropriations, any monies received through collection of fees 
        under this subsection shall be available to the Secretary, and 
        shall be used by the Secretary, for the operation and 
        maintenance of the disposal facility from which they were 
        collected.

SEC. 218. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 
411; 30 Stat. 1153), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``thirteen, fourteen, and fifteen'' and 
        inserting ``13, 14, 15, 19, and 20''; and
            (2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five hundred dollars 
        nor less than five hundred dollars'' and inserting ``of up to 
        $25,000 per day''.
    (b) General Authority.--Section 20 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 
U.S.C. 415; 30 Stat. 1154), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``expense'' the first place it appears in 
        subsection (a) and inserting ``actual expense, including 
        administrative expenses,'';
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``cost'' and inserting 
        ``actual cost, including administrative costs,'';
            (3) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (a) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) Removal Requirement.--Within 24 hours after the Secretary of 
the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating issues an order to 
stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of the United States 
because of conditions related to the sinking or grounding of a vessel, 
the owner or operator of the vessel, with the approval of the Secretary 
of the Army, shall begin removal of the vessel using the most 
expeditious removal method available or, if appropriate, secure the 
vessel pending removal to allow navigation to resume. If the owner or 
operator fails to begin removal or to secure the vessel pending removal 
or fails to complete removal as soon as possible, the Secretary of the 
Army shall remove or destroy the vessel using the summary removal 
procedures under subsection (a) of this section.''.

SEC. 219. SMALL PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$12,500,000'' and inserting 
        ``$15,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting ``$1,500,000''.

SEC. 220. UNECONOMICAL COST-SHARING REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 221(a) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b) is amended by striking the period at the end of the first sentence 
and inserting the following: ``; except that no such agreement shall be 
required if the Secretary determines that the administrative costs 
associated with negotiating, executing, or administering the agreement 
would exceed the amount of the contribution required from the non-
Federal interest and are less than $25,000.''.

SEC. 221. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES.

    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``, watersheds, or 
        ecosystems'' after ``basins'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 
                paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively; and
            (3) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$10,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``$300,000'' and inserting 
                ``$500,000''.

SEC. 222. CORPS OF ENGINEERS' EXPENSES.

    Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (33 U.S.C. 701u; 64 
Stat. 183) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``continental limits of the''; and
            (2) by striking the 2d colon and all that follows through 
        ``for this purpose''.

SEC. 223. STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCY REVIEW PERIOD.

    The 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (33 U.S.C. 
701-1(a); 58 Stat. 888), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Within ninety'' and inserting ``Within 
        30''; and
            (2) by striking ``ninety-day period.'' and inserting ``30-
        day period.''.

SEC. 224. LIMITATION ON REIMBURSEMENT OF NON-FEDERAL COSTS PER PROJECT.

    Section 215(a) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5a(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$5,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking the final period.

SEC. 225. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL.

    (a) Additional Controlled Plants.--Section 104(a) of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610(a)) is amended by inserting after 
``alligatorweed,'' the following: ``melaleuca,''.
    (b) Authorization.--Section 104(b) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 610(b)) 
is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''.

SEC. 226. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Project Purpose.--Section 405(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2239 note; 106 Stat. 4863) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Project purpose.--The purpose of the project to be 
        carried out under this section is to provide for the 
        development of 1 or more sediment decontamination technologies 
        on a pilot scale demonstrating a capacity of at least 500,000 
        cubic yards per year.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--The first sentence of section 
405(c) of such Act is amended to read as follows: ``There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal 
years beginning after September 30, 1996.''.
    (c) Reports.--Section 405 of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Reports.--Not later than September 30, 1998, and periodically 
thereafter, the Administrator and the Secretary shall transmit to 
Congress a report on the results of the project to be carried out under 
this section, including an assessment of the progress made in achieving 
the intent of the program set forth in subsection (a)(3).''.

SEC. 227. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Before'' at the beginning of the second 
        sentence and inserting ``Upon''; and
            (2) by inserting ``planning, designing, or'' before 
        ``construction'' in the last sentence.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Section 52 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 579a note; 102 Stat. 4044) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a); and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively.

SEC. 228. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    (a) General Authority.--In carrying out research and development in 
support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army, the 
Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and development 
agreements, cooperative agreements, and grants with non-Federal 
entities, including State and local governments, colleges and 
universities, consortia, professional and technical societies, public 
and private scientific and technical foundations, research 
institutions, educational organizations, and non-profit organizations.
    (b) Special Rules.--With respect to contracts for research and 
development, the Secretary may include requirements that have potential 
commercial application and may also use such potential application as 
an evaluation factor where appropriate.

SEC. 229. BENEFITS TO NAVIGATION.

    In evaluating potential improvements to navigation and the 
maintenance of navigation projects, the Secretary shall consider, and 
include for purposes of project justification, economic benefits 
generated by cruise ships as commercial navigation benefits.

SEC. 230. LOSS OF LIFE PREVENTION.

    Section 904 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2281) is amended by inserting ``including the loss of life which 
may be associated with flooding and coastal storm events,'' after 
``costs,''.

SEC. 231. SCENIC AND AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS.

    In conducting studies of potential water resources projects, the 
Secretary shall consider measures to preserve and enhance scenic and 
aesthetic qualities in the vicinity of such projects.

SEC. 232. REMOVAL OF STUDY PROHIBITIONS.

    Nothing in section 208 of the Urgent Supplemental Appropriations 
Act, 1986 (100 Stat. 749), section 505 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1993 (106 Stat. 1343), or any other 
provision of law shall be deemed to limit the authority of the 
Secretary to undertake studies for the purpose of investigating 
alternative modes of financing hydroelectric power facilities under the 
jurisdiction of the Department of the Army with funds appropriated 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 233. SENSE OF CONGRESS; REQUIREMENT REGARDING NOTICE.

    (a) Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products.--It is the 
sense of Congress that, to the greatest extent practicable, all 
equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this 
Act should be American-made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the greatest extent 
practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice 
describing the statement made in subsection (a).

SEC. 234. RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

    Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 2319; 104 Stat. 4639) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a); and
            (2) by striking ``(b) Public Participa-tion.--''.

SEC. 235. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

    (a) Section  203 of 1992 Act.--Section 203(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4826) is amended by 
striking ``(8662)'' and inserting ``(8862)''.
    (b) Section  225 of 1992 Act.--Section 225(c) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4838) is amended by 
striking ``(8662)'' in the second sentence and inserting ``(8862)''.

                    TITLE III--PROJECT MODIFICATIONS

SEC. 301. MOBILE HARBOR, ALABAMA.

    The undesignated paragraph under the heading ``mobile harbor, 
alabama'' in section 201(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4090) is amended by striking the first semicolon and 
all that follows and inserting a period and the following: ``In 
disposing of dredged material from such project, the Secretary, after 
compliance with applicable laws and after opportunity for public review 
and comment, may consider alternatives to disposal of such material in 
the Gulf of Mexico, including environmentally acceptable alternatives 
for beneficial uses of dredged material and environmental 
restoration.''.

SEC. 302. ALAMO DAM, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control and other purposes, Alamo Dam and 
Lake, Arizona, authorized by section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of 
December 22, 1944, (58 Stat. 900), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to operate the Alamo Dam to provide fish and wildlife 
benefits both upstream and downstream of the Dam. Such operation shall 
not reduce flood control and recreation benefits provided by the 
project.

SEC. 303. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to permit the non-Federal contribution for the project to be 
determined in accordance with sections 103(k) and 103(m) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 and to direct the Secretary to enter 
into negotiations with non-Federal interests pursuant to section 103(l) 
of such Act concerning the timing of the initial payment of the non-
Federal contribution.

SEC. 304. PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

    Section 321 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4848) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``control'' and inserting ``control, 
        ecosystem restoration,''; and
            (2) by striking ``$6,500,000.'' and inserting 
        ``$17,500,000. The non-Federal share for costs assigned to 
        flood control measures to protect developed areas adjacent to 
        the project shall be consistent with the cost sharing 
        requirements of section 903(c) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986.''.

SEC. 305. SAN FRANCISCO RIVER AT CLIFTON, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, San Francisco River, Clifton, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $21,100,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $13,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $7,300,000.

SEC. 306. GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Sacramento River, California, 
authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
control of the floods of the Mississippi River and the Sacramento 
River, California, and for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 
Stat. 948), and as modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the portion of the 
project at Glenn-Colusa, California, at a total cost of $14,200,000.

SEC. 307. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, SAN PEDRO BAY, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The navigation project for Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San 
Pedro Bay, California, authorized by section 201(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4091), is modified to 
provide that, notwithstanding section 101(a)(4) of such Act, the cost 
of the relocation of the sewer outfall by the Port of Los Angeles shall 
be credited toward the payment required from the non-Federal interest 
by section 101(a)(2) of such Act.

SEC. 308. OAKLAND HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The projects for navigation, Oakland Outer Harbor, California, and 
Oakland Inner Harbor, California, authorized by section 202 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), are modified 
by combining the 2 projects into 1 project, to be designated as the 
Oakland Harbor, California, project. The Oakland Harbor, California, 
project shall be prosecuted by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions recommended in 
the reports designated in such section 202, at a total cost of 
$90,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $59,150,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $31,700,000. The non-Federal share of 
project costs and any available credits toward the non-Federal share 
shall be calculated on the basis of the total cost of the combined 
project.

SEC. 309. QUEENSWAY BAY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 4(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4016) is amended by adding at the end the following sentence: 
``In addition, the Secretary shall perform advance maintenance dredging 
in the Queensway Bay Channel, California, at a total cost of 
$5,000,000.''.

SEC. 310. SAN LUIS REY, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control of the San Luis Rey River, 
California, authorized pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5; 79 Stat. 1073-1074), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a total cost not to 
exceed $81,600,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $61,100,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $20,500,000.

SEC. 311. THAMES RIVER, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) Reconfiguration of Turning Basin.--The project for navigation, 
Thames River, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizing construction, repair, and preservation of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
approved August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), is modified to make the 
turning basin have the following alignment: Starting at a point on the 
eastern limit of the existing project, N251052.93, E783934.59, thence 
running north 5 degrees 25 minutes 21.3 seconds east 341.06 feet to a 
point, N251392.46, E783966.82, thence running north 47 degrees 24 
minutes 14.0 seconds west 268.72 feet to a point, N251574.34, 
E783769.00, thence running north 88 degrees 41 minutes 52.2 seconds 
west 249.06 feet to a point, N251580.00, E783520.00, thence running 
south 46 degrees 16 minutes 22.9 seconds west 318.28 feet to a point, 
N251360.00, E783290.00, thence running south 19 degrees 01 minute 32.2 
seconds east 306.76 feet to a point, N251070.00, E783390.00, thence 
running south 45 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds east 155.56 feet to a 
point, N250960.00, E783500.00 on the existing western limit.
    (b) Non-Federal Responsibility for Initial Dredging.--Any required 
initial dredging of the widened portions of the turning basin 
identified in subsection (a) shall be accomplished at non-Federal 
expense.
    (c) Conforming Deauthorization.--Those portions of the existing 
turning basin which are not included in the reconfigured turning basin 
as described in subsection (a) shall no longer be authorized after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 312. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The project for flood protection, Potomac River, Washington, 
District of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act 
of June 22, 1936 (74 Stat. 1574), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the 
General Design Memorandum dated May 1992 at a Federal cost of 
$1,800,000; except that a temporary closure may be used instead of a 
permanent structure at 17th Street. Operation and maintenance of the 
project shall be a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 313. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, Florida, authorized 
by section 101(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4802), is modified to authorize the Secretary to reclassify the 
removal and replacement of stone protection on both sides of the 
channel as general navigation features. The Secretary shall reimburse 
any costs that are incurred by the non-Federal sponsor in connection 
with the reclassified work and that the Secretary determines to be in 
excess of the non-Federal share of costs for general navigation 
features. The Federal and non-Federal shares of the cost of the 
reclassified work shall be determined in accordance with section 101 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 314. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, CANAL 51.

    The project for flood protection of West Palm Beach, Florida (C-
51), authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
Stat. 1183), is modified to provide for the construction of an enlarged 
stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East, generally 
in accordance with the plan of improvements described in the February 
15, 1994, report entitled ``Everglades Protection Project, Palm Beach 
County, Florida, Conceptual Design'', with such modifications as are 
approved by the Secretary. The additional work authorized by this 
subsection shall be accomplished at Federal expense. Operation and 
maintenance of the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern 
Florida project, and all costs of such operation and maintenance shall 
be provided by non-Federal interests.

SEC. 315. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, CANAL 111 (C-111).

    (a) In General.--The project for Central and Southern Florida, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
1176) and modified by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
Stat. 740-741), is modified to authorize the Secretary to implement the 
recommended plan of improvement contained in a report entitled 
``Central and Southern Florida Project, Final Integrated General 
Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement, Canal 111 (C-
111), South Dade County, Florida'', dated May 1994, including 
acquisition by non-Federal interests of such portions of the Frog Pond 
and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 percent.
            (2) Department of interior responsibility.--The Department 
        of the Interior shall pay 25 percent of the cost of acquiring 
        such portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are 
        needed for the project. The amount paid by the Department of 
        the Interior shall be included as part of the Federal share of 
        the cost of implementing the plan.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs of the improvements undertaken 
        pursuant to this subsection shall be 100 percent; except that 
        the Federal Government shall reimburse the non-Federal project 
        sponsor 60 percent of the costs of operating and maintaining 
        pump stations that pump water into Taylor Slough in the 
        Everglades National Park.

SEC. 316. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), 
Florida, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4139-4140), is modified to direct 
the Secretary to carry out a project for flow and circulation 
improvement within Mill Cove, at a total cost of $2,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $2,000,000.

SEC. 317. TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA.

    The project for beach erosion control, Tybee Island, Georgia, 
authorized pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-5), is modified to include as part of the project the 
portion of the ocean shore of Tybee Island located south of the 
extension of 9th Street.

SEC. 318. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of the 
White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Flood Control Act 
of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to undertake riverfront alterations as described in the 
Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Master Plan, dated February 
1994, at a total cost of $85,975,000, with an estimated first Federal 
cost of $39,975,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of 
$46,000,000. The cost of work, including relocations undertaken by the 
non-Federal interest after February 15, 1994, on features identified in 
the Master Plan shall be credited toward the non-Federal share of 
project costs.

SEC. 319. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to limit the 
capacity of the reservoir project not to exceed 11,000,000,000 gallons 
or 32,000 acre-feet, to provide that the reservoir project may not be 
located north of 55th Street or west of East Avenue in the vicinity of 
McCook, Illinois, and to provide that the reservoir project may only be 
constructed on the basis of a specific plan that has been evaluated by 
the Secretary under the provisions of the National Environmental Policy 
Act of 1969.

SEC. 320. CHICAGO LOCK AND THOMAS J. O'BRIEN LOCK, ILLINOIS.

    The project for navigation, Chicago Harbor, Lake Michigan, 
Illinois, for which operation and maintenance responsibility was 
transferred to the Secretary under chapter IV of title I of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (97 Stat. 311) and section 107 of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1982 (95 Stat. 
1137) is modified to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of making such structural repairs as are 
necessary to prevent leakage through the Chicago Lock and the Thomas J. 
O'Brien Lock, Illinois, and to determine the need for installing 
permanent flow measurement equipment at such locks to measure any 
leakage. The Secretary is authorized to carry out such repairs and 
installations as are necessary following completion of the study.

SEC. 321. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The project for navigation, Kaskaskia River, Illinois, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1175), is 
modified to add fish and wildlife and habitat restoration as project 
purposes.

SEC. 322. LOCKS AND DAM 26, ALTON, ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI.

    Section 102(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4613) is amended by striking ``that requires no separable 
projects lands'' and inserting ``on project lands and other contiguous 
nonproject lands, including those lands referred to as the Alton 
Commons''.

SEC. 323. NORTH BRANCH OF CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The project for flood protection, North Branch of the Chicago 
River, Illinois, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project in accordance with the report of the 
Corps of Engineers dated March 1994, at a total cost of $34,228,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $20,905,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $13,323,000.

SEC. 324. ILLINOIS AND MICHIGAN CANAL.

    Section 314(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4847) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Such 
improvements shall include marina development at Lock 14, to be carried 
out in consultation with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, 
at a total cost of $6,374,000.''.

SEC. 325. ARKANSAS CITY, KANSAS.

    The project for flood control, Arkansas City, Kansas, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4116), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a total cost of $38,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $28,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,400,000.

SEC. 326. HALSTEAD, KANSAS.

    The project for flood control, Halstead, Kansas, authorized by 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4116), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project in accordance with the report of the Corps of Engineers dated 
March 19, 1993, at a total cost of $11,100,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$2,775,000.

SEC. 327. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND CUMBERLAND 
              RIVER, KENTUCKY, WEST VIRGINIA, AND VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control, Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big 
Sandy River and Cumberland River, Kentucky, West Virginia, and 
Virginia, authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified to 
provide that the minimum level of flood protection to be afforded by 
the project shall be the level required to provide protection from a 
100-year flood or from the flood of April 1977, whichever level of 
protection is greater.

SEC. 328. COMITE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Comite River Diversion project for flood control, authorized as 
part of the project for flood control, Amite River and Tributaries, 
Louisiana, by section 101(11) of the Water Resource Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4802-4803), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project at a total cost of $121,600,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $70,577,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $51,023,000.

SEC. 329. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane damage prevention, flood control, and 
beach erosion along Grand Isle and Vicinity, Louisiana, authorized by 
section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct a permanent breakwater 
and levee system at a total cost of $17,000,000.

SEC. 330. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane damage prevention and flood control, Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified to provide that St. 
Bernard Parish, Louisiana, and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, 
Louisiana, shall not be required to pay the unpaid balance, including 
interest, of the non-Federal cost-share of the project.

SEC. 331. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection project on Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified to direct the Secretary to provide a 
credit to the State of Louisiana toward its non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project. The credit shall be for the cost incurred by the 
State in developing and relocating oyster beds to offset the adverse 
impacts on active and productive oyster beds in the Davis Pond project 
area but shall not exceed $7,500,000.

SEC. 332. MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS, VENICE, LOUISIANA.

    The project for navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified to provide for the extension of the 
16-foot deep by 250-foot wide Baptiste Collette Bayou entrance channel 
to approximately Mile 8 of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation 
channel, at a total estimated Federal cost of $80,000.

SEC. 333. RED RIVER WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources and Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by 
section 102(p) of the Water Resources and Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4613), is further modified--
            (1) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at 
        a total cost of $10,500,000; and
            (2) to provide that lands that are purchased adjacent to 
        the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area may be located in 
        Caddo Parish or Red River Parish.

SEC. 334. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
Maryland, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 297) is modified to direct the Secretary--
            (1) to expedite review of potential straightening of the 
        channel at the Tolchester Channel S-Turn; and
            (2) if determined to be feasible and necessary for safe and 
        efficient navigation, to implement such straightening as part 
        of project maintenance.

SEC. 335. SAGINAW RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The project for flood protection, Saginaw River, Michigan, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
311) is modified to include as part of the project the design and 
construction of an inflatable dam on the Flint River, Michigan, at a 
total cost of $500,000.

SEC. 336. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Sault Sainte Marie, 
Chippewa County, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254-4255), is modified as 
provided by this subsection.
    (b) Payment of Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project referred to in subsection (a) shall be paid as 
follows:
            (1) That portion of the non-Federal share which the 
        Secretary determines is attributable to use of the lock by 
        vessels calling at Canadian ports shall be paid by the United 
        States.
            (2) The remaining portion of the non-Federal share shall be 
        paid by the Great Lakes States pursuant to an agreement entered 
        into by such States.
    (c) Payment Term of Additional Percentage.--The amount to be paid 
by non-Federal interests pursuant to section 101(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)) and this 
subsection with respect to the project referred to in subsection (a) 
may be paid over a period of 50 years or the expected life of the 
project, whichever is shorter.
    (d) Great Lakes States Defined.--For the purposes of this section, 
the term ``Great Lakes States'' means the States of Illinois, Indiana, 
Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

SEC. 337. STILLWATER, MINNESOTA.

    Section 363 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4861-4862) is amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``riverfront,'' the following: ``or 
        expansion of such system if the Secretary determines that the 
        expansion is feasible,'';
            (2) by striking ``$3,200,000'' and inserting 
        ``$11,600,000'';
            (3) by striking ``$2,400,000'' and inserting 
        ``$8,700,000''; and
            (4) by striking ``$800,000'' and inserting ``$2,900,000''.

SEC. 338. NEW MADRID HARBOR, MISSOURI.

    The project for navigation, New Madrid Harbor, Missouri, authorized 
pursuant to section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
577) and modified by section 102(n) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4807), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of the existing 
Federal channel referred to in such section 102(n) in addition to 
maintaining New Madrid County Harbor.

SEC. 339. CAPE GIRARDEAU, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, Cape Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan 
Area, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118-4119), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to construct the project, including implementation of 
nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $45,414,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $33,030,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $12,384,000.

SEC. 340. ST. JOHN'S BAYOU--NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MISSOURI.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Federal assistance made 
available under the rural enterprise zone program of the Department of 
Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-Federal share of the 
costs of the project for flood control, St. John's Bayou and New Madrid 
Floodway, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).

SEC. 341. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER PARK, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 101(a)(18)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4608) is amended by striking ``$25,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$75,000,000''.

SEC. 342. PASSAIC RIVER, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 1148 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1148. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN.

    ``(a) Acquisition of Lands.--The Secretary is authorized to acquire 
from willing sellers lands on which residential structures are located 
and which are subject to frequent and recurring flood damage, as 
identified in the supplemental floodway report of the Corps of 
Engineers, Passaic River Buyout Study, September 1995, at an estimated 
total cost of $194,000,000.
    ``(b) Retention of Lands for Flood Protection.--Lands acquired by 
the Secretary under this section shall be retained by the Secretary for 
future use in conjunction with flood protection and flood management in 
the Passaic River Basin.
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of carrying 
out this section shall be 25 percent plus any amount that might result 
from application of the requirements of subsection (d).
    ``(d) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver Authority.--In 
evaluating and implementing the project under this section, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c) of this Act, 
to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying 
such section is necessary to implement the project.''.

SEC. 343. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for flood control, Molly Ann's Brook, New Jersey, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project in accordance with the report of the Corps of Engineers 
dated April 3, 1996, at a total cost of $40,100,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $22,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$17,500,000.

SEC. 344. RAMAPO AND MAHWAH RIVERS, NEW JERSEY AND NEW YORK.

    The project for flood control, Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, New Jersey 
and New York, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4120), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project in accordance with the report of the 
Corps of Engineers dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $11,300,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $8,500,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $2,800,000.

SEC. 345. ARTHUR KILL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey, 
authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project at a total cost of $83,000,000.

SEC. 346. JONES INLET, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York, authorized by 
section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing construction, 
repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to place uncontaminated dredged 
material on beach areas downdrift from the federally maintained channel 
for the purpose of mitigating the interruption of littoral system 
natural processes caused by the jetty and continued dredging of the 
federally maintained channel.

SEC. 347. KILL VAN KULL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, Kill Van Kull, New York and New Jersey, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4095), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project at a total cost of $750,000,000.

SEC. 348. WILMINGTON HARBOR-NORTHEAST CAPE FEAR RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear 
River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project substantially in 
accordance with the General Design Memorandum dated April 1990 and the 
General Design Memorandum Supplement dated February 1994, at a total 
cost of $52,041,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,729,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $26,312,000.

SEC. 349. GARRISON DAM, NORTH DAKOTA.

    The project for flood control, Garrison Dam, North Dakota, 
authorized by section 9 of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 
(58 Stat. 891), is modified to authorize the Secretary to acquire 
permanent flowage and saturation easements over the lands in Williams 
County, North Dakota, extending from the riverward margin of the 
Buford-Trenton Irrigation District main canal to the north bank of the 
Missouri River, beginning at the Buford-Trenton Irrigation District 
pumping station located in the northeast quarter of section 17, 
township 152 north, range 104 west, and continuing northeasterly 
downstream to the land referred to as the East Bottom, and any other 
lands outside of the boundaries of the Buford-Trenton Irrigation 
District which have been adversely affected by rising ground water and 
surface flooding. Any easement acquired by the Secretary pursuant to 
this subsection shall include the right, power, and privilege of the 
Government to submerge, overflow, percolate, and saturate the surface 
and subsurface of the land. The cost of acquiring such easements shall 
not exceed 90 percent, or be less than 75 percent, of the unaffected 
fee value of the lands. The project is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to provide a lump sum payment of $60,000 to the Buford-
Trenton Irrigation District for power requirements associated with 
operation of the drainage pumps and to relinquish all right, title, and 
interest of the United States to the drainage pumps located within the 
boundaries of the Irrigation District.

SEC. 350. WISTER LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    The flood control project for Wister Lake, LeFlore County, 
Oklahoma, authorized by section 4 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 
1938 (52 Stat. 1218), is modified to increase the level of the 
conservation pool by 1 foot and to adjust the seasonal pool operation 
to accommodate the change in the conservation pool elevation.

SEC. 351. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON AND 
              WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The project for Bonneville Lock and Dam, Columbia 
River, Oregon and Washington, authorized by the Act of August 20, 1937 
(50 Stat. 731), and modified by section 83 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 35), is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to convey to the city of North Bonneville, Washington, at 
no further cost to the city, all right, title and interest of the 
United States in and to the following:
            (1) Any municipal facilities, utilities fixtures, and 
        equipment for the relocated city, and any remaining lands 
        designated as open spaces or municipal lots not previously 
        conveyed to the city, specifically, Lots M1 through M15, M16 
        (the ``community center lot''), M18, M19, M22, M24, S42 through 
        S45, and S52 through S60.
            (2) The ``school lot'' described as Lot 2, block 5, on the 
        plat of relocated North Bonneville.
            (3) Parcels 2 and C, but only upon the completion of any 
        environmental response actions required under applicable law.
            (4) That portion of Parcel B lying south of the existing 
        city boundary, west of the sewage treatment plant, and north of 
        the drainage ditch that is located adjacent to the northerly 
        limit of the Hamilton Island landfill, provided the Secretary 
        determines, at the time of the proposed conveyance, that the 
        Army has taken all action necessary to protect human health and 
        the environment.
            (5) Such portions of Parcel H which can be conveyed without 
        a requirement for further investigation, inventory or other 
        action by the Department of the Army under the provisions of 
        the National Historic Preservation Act.
            (6) Such easements as the Secretary deems necessary for--
                    (A) sewer and water line crossings of relocated 
                Washington State Highway 14; and
                    (B) reasonable public access to the Columbia River 
                across those portions of Hamilton Island that remain 
                under the ownership of the United States.
    (b) Time Period for Conveyances.--The conveyances referred to in 
subsections (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(5), and (a)(6)(A) shall be completed 
within 180 days after the United States receives the release referred 
to in subsection (d). All other conveyances shall be completed 
expeditiously, subject to any conditions specified in the applicable 
subsection.
    (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the conveyances authorized by 
subsection (a) is to resolve all outstanding issues between the United 
States and the city of North Bonneville.
    (d) Acknowledgement of Payment; Release of Claims Relating to 
Relocation of City.--As a prerequisite to the conveyances authorized by 
subsection (a), the city of North Bonneville shall execute an 
acknowledgement of payment of just compensation and shall execute a 
release of any and all claims for relief of any kind against the United 
States growing out of the relocation of the city of North Bonneville, 
or any prior Federal legislation relating thereto, and shall dismiss, 
with prejudice, any pending litigation, if any, involving such matters.
    (e) Release by Attorney General.--Upon receipt of the city's 
acknowledgment and release referred to in subsection (d), the Attorney 
General of the United States shall dismiss any pending litigation, if 
any, arising out of the relocation of the city of North Bonneville, and 
execute a release of any and all rights to damages of any kind under 
the February 20, 1987, judgment of the United States Claims Court, 
including any interest thereon.
    (f) Acknowledgment of Entitlements; Release by City of Claims.--
Within 60 days after the conveyances authorized by subsection (a) 
(other than paragraph (6)(B)) have been completed, the city shall 
execute an acknowledgement that all entitlements under such paragraph 
have been completed and shall execute a release of any and all claims 
for relief of any kind against the United States arising out of this 
subsection.
    (g) Effects on City.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the city of North Bonneville, or any successor in interest 
thereto, shall--
            (1) be precluded from exercising any jurisdiction over any 
        lands owned in whole or in part by the United States and 
        administered by the United States Army Corps of Engineers in 
        connection with the Bonneville project; and
            (2) be authorized to change the zoning designations of, 
        sell, or resell Parcels S35 and S56, which are presently 
        designated as open spaces.

SEC. 352. COLUMBIA RIVER DREDGING, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    The project for navigation, Lower Willamette and Columbia Rivers 
below Vancouver, Washington and Portland, Oregon, authorized by the 
first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations Act of June 18, 
1878 (20 Stat. 152), is modified to direct the Secretary--
            (1) to conduct channel simulation and to carry out 
        improvements to the existing deep draft channel between river 
        miles 27 and 34, at a cost not to exceed $2,400,000; and
            (2) to conduct overdepth and advance maintenance dredging 
        that is necessary to maintain authorized channel dimensions.

SEC. 353. LACKAWANNA RIVER AT SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Lackawanna River at Scranton, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101(16) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to carry out the project for flood control for the Plot and 
Green Ridge sections of the project. In evaluating and implementing the 
project, the Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to 
participate in financing of the project in accordance with section 
903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to the extent 
that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 354. MUSSERS DAM, MIDDLE CREEK, SNYDER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 209(e)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4830) is amended by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting 
``$5,000,000''.

SEC. 355. SAW MILL RUN, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project in accordance with the report of the 
Corps of Engineers dated April 8, 1994, at a total cost of $12,780,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $9,585,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $3,195,000.

SEC. 356. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The navigation project for the Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by the first section of the River and Harbor Appropriations 
Act of August 8, 1917 (40 Stat. 252), is modified to provide for the 
periodic removal and disposal of sediment to a depth of 6 feet detained 
within portions of the Fairmount pool between the Fairmount Dam and the 
Columbia Bridge, generally within the limits of the channel alignments 
referred to as the Schuylkill River Racecourse and return lane, and the 
Belmont Water Works intakes and Boathouse Row.

SEC. 357. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 313(g)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4846) is amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting 
``$90,000,000''.

SEC. 358. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
undertake as part of the construction of the project mechanical and 
electrical upgrades to existing stormwater pumping stations in the 
Wyoming Valley and to undertake mitigation measures.

SEC. 359. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PUERTO RICO.

    The project for navigation, San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4097), is modified to authorize the Secretary to deepen 
the bar channel to depths varying from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean 
low water with other modifications to authorized interior channels as 
generally described in the General Reevaluation Report and 
Environmental Assessment, dated March 1994, at a total cost of 
$43,993,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $27,341,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $16,652,000.

SEC. 360. NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 361(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4861) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$200,000'' and inserting ``$1,900,000'';
            (2) by striking ``$150,000'' and inserting ``$1,425,000''; 
        and
            (3) by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting ``$475,000''.

SEC. 361. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The project for navigation, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4096), is modified to direct the Secretary to undertake 
ditching, clearing, spillway replacement, and dike reconstruction of 
the Clouter Creek Disposal Area, as a part of the operation and 
maintenance of the Charleston Harbor project.

SEC. 362. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway 
Extension, Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091), is modified to provide that, 
notwithstanding the last sentence of subsection (c) of section 104 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, non-Federal interests may 
apply for crediting under such section 104, against the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project, the cost of work performed by the 
non-Federal interests in constructing flood protection works for 
Rochester Park and the north section of the Central Wastewater 
Treatment Plant.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be credited under 
subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary. In determining 
such amount, the Secretary may permit crediting only for that portion 
of the work performed by the non-Federal interests which is compatible 
with the project referred to in subsection (a), including any 
modification thereof, and which is required for construction of such 
project.
    (c) Cash Contribution.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to limit the applicability of the requirement contained in section 
103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to the 
project referred to in subsection (a).

SEC. 363. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UTAH.

    The project for flood control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized 
by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4610), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
the project at a total cost of $12,870,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $8,580,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,290,000.

SEC. 364. HAYSI LAKE, VIRGINIA.

    The Haysi Lake, Virginia, feature of the project for flood control, 
Tug Fork of the Big Sandy River, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified--
            (1) to add recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement as 
        project purposes;
            (2) to direct the Secretary to construct the Haysi Dam 
        feature of the project substantially in accordance with Plan A 
        as set forth in the Draft General Plan Supplement Report for 
        the Levisa Fork Basin, Virginia and Kentucky, dated May 1995; 
        and
            (3) to direct the Secretary to apply section 103(m) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4087) to the 
        construction of such feature in the same manner as that section 
        is applied to other projects or project features construed 
        pursuant to such section 202(a).

SEC. 365. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The project for navigation and shoreline protection, Rudee Inlet, 
Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to continue maintenance of the project for 50 
years beginning on the date of initial construction of the project. The 
Federal share of the cost of such maintenance shall be determined in 
accordance with title I of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 366. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The non-Federal share of the costs of the project for beach erosion 
control and hurricane protection, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized 
by section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4136), shall be reduced by $3,120,803, or by such amount as is 
determined by an audit carried out by the Secretary to be due to the 
city of Virginia Beach as reimbursement for the Federal share of beach 
nourishment activities carried out by the city between October 1, 1986, 
and September 30, 1993, if the Federal Government has not reimbursed 
the city for the activities prior to the date on which a project 
cooperative agreement is executed for the project.

SEC. 367. EAST WATERWAY, WASHINGTON.

    The project for navigation, East and West waterways, Seattle 
Harbor, Washington, authorized by the first section of the River and 
Harbor Appropriations Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1275), is modified 
to direct the Secretary--
            (1) to expedite review of potential deepening of the 
        channel in the East waterway from Elliott Bay to Terminal 25 to 
        a depth of up to 51 feet; and
            (2) if determined to be feasible, to implement such 
        deepening as part of project maintenance.
In carrying out work authorized by this section, the Secretary shall 
coordinate with the Port of Seattle regarding use of Slip 27 as a 
dredged material disposal area.

SEC. 368. BLUESTONE LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810) is amended by inserting ``except for that organic matter 
necessary to maintain and enhance the biological resources of such 
waters and such nonobtrusive items of debris as may not be economically 
feasible to prevent being released through such project,'' after 
``project,'' the first place it appears.

SEC. 369. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Cost Sharing.--Section 340(c)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Cost sharing.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Total project costs under each 
                local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
                subsection shall be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 
                percent non-Federal. The non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
                completed by such interest prior to entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a 
                project. The credit for such design work shall not 
                exceed 6 percent of the total construction costs of the 
                project. The Federal share may be in the form of grants 
                or reimbursements of project costs.
                    ``(B) Interest.--In the event of delays in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of a project's cost.
                    ``(C) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                its share of project costs, including all reasonable 
                costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of such 
                project on publicly owned or controlled lands, but not 
                to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
                    ``(D) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and 
                maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
                assistance provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent non-Federal.''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 370. KICKAPOO RIVER, WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and allied purposes, 
Kickapoo River, Wisconsin, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1190) and modified by section 814 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4169), is further 
modified as provided by this section.
    (b) Transfer of Property.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to the requirements of this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall transfer to the State of 
        Wisconsin, without consideration, all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States to the lands described in 
        paragraph (3), including all works, structures, and other 
        improvements to such lands.
            (2) Transfer to secretary of the interior.--Subject to the 
        requirements of this subsection, on the date of the transfer 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall transfer to the 
        Secretary of the Interior, without consideration, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to lands that 
        are culturally and religiously significant sites of the Ho-
        Chunk Nation (a federally recognized Indian tribe) and are 
        located within the lands described in paragraph (3). Such lands 
        shall be specified in accordance with paragraph (4)(C) and may 
        not exceed a total of 1,200 acres.
            (3) Land description.--The lands to be transferred pursuant 
        to paragraphs (1) and (2) are the approximately 8,569 acres of 
        land associated with the LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of the 
        project referred to in subsection (a) in Vernon County, 
        Wisconsin, in the following sections:
                    (A) Section 31, Township 14 North, Range 1 West of 
                the 4th Principal Meridian.
                    (B) Sections 2 through 11, and 16, 17, 20, and 21, 
                Township 13 North, Range 2 West of the 4th Principal 
                Meridian.
                    (C) Sections 15, 16, 21 through 24, 26, 27, 31, and 
                33 through 36, Township 14 North, Range 2 West of the 
                4th Principal Meridian.
            (4) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) Hold harmless; reimbursement of united 
                states.--The transfer under paragraph (1) shall be made 
                on the condition that the State of Wisconsin enters 
                into a written agreement with the Secretary to hold the 
                United States harmless from all claims arising from or 
                through the operation of the lands and improvements 
                subject to the transfer. If title to the lands 
                described in paragraph (3) is sold or transferred by 
                the State, then the State shall reimburse the United 
                States for the price originally paid by the United 
                States for purchasing such lands.
                    (B) In general.--The Secretary shall make the 
                transfers under paragraphs (1) and (2) only if on or 
                before April 30, 1997, the State of Wisconsin enters 
                into and submits to the Secretary a memorandum of 
                understanding, as specified in subparagraph (C), with 
                the tribal organization (as defined by section 4(l) of 
                the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 
                Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(l)) of the Ho-Chunk Nation.
                    (C) Memorandum of understanding.--The memorandum of 
                understanding referred to in subparagraph (B) shall 
                contain, at a minimum, the following:
                            (i) A description of sites and associated 
                        lands to be transferred to the Secretary of the 
                        Interior under paragraph (2).
                            (ii) An agreement specifying that the lands 
                        transferred under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall 
                        be preserved in a natural state and developed 
                        only to the extent necessary, consistent with 
                        the Wisconsin State law creating the Kickapoo 
                        Valley Governing Board (1993 Wisconsin State 
                        Act 349), to enhance outdoor recreational and 
                        educational opportunities.
                            (iii) An agreement specifying the terms and 
                        conditions of a plan for the management of the 
                        lands to be transferred under paragraphs (1) 
                        and (2).
                            (iv) A provision requiring a review of the 
                        plan referred to in clause (iii) to be 
                        conducted every 10 years under which the State 
                        of Wisconsin, acting through the Kickapoo 
                        Valley Governing Board, and the Ho-Chunk Nation 
                        may agree to revisions of the plan in order to 
                        address changed circumstances on the lands 
                        transferred under paragraph (2). Such provision 
                        may include a plan for the transfer to the 
                        Secretary of the Interior of any additional 
                        site discovered to be culturally and 
                        religiously significant to the Ho-Chunk Nation.
            (5) Administration of lands.--The lands transferred to the 
        Secretary of the Interior under paragraph (2), and any lands 
        transferred to the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to the 
        memorandum of understanding entered into under paragraph (3), 
        shall be held in trust for, and added to and administered as 
        part of the reservation of, the Ho-Chunk Nation.
            (6) Transfer of flowage easements.--The Secretary shall 
        transfer to the owner of the servient estate, without 
        consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to each flowage easement acquired as part of the 
        project referred to in subsection (a) within Township 14 North, 
        Range 2 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, Vernon County, 
        Wisconsin.
            (7) Deadlines.--Not later than July 1, 1997, the Secretary 
        shall transmit to the State of Wisconsin an offer to make the 
        transfer under this paragraph. Such offer shall provide for the 
        transfer to be made in the period beginning on November 1, 
        1997, and ending on December 31, 1997.
            (8) Deauthorization.--The LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of 
        the project referred to in subsection (a) is not authorized 
        after the date of the transfer under this subsection.
            (9) Interim management and maintenance.--The Secretary 
        shall continue to manage and maintain the LaFarge Dam and Lake 
        portion of the project referred to in subsection (a) until the 
        date of the transfer under this section.
    (c) Completion of Project Features.--
            (1) Requirement.--The Secretary shall undertake the 
        completion of the following features of the project referred to 
        in subsection (a):
                    (A) The continued relocation of State highway route 
                131 and county highway routes P and F substantially in 
                accordance with plans contained in Design Memorandum 
                No. 6, Relocation-LaFarge Reservoir, dated June 1970; 
                except that the relocation shall generally follow the 
                existing road rights-of-way through the Kickapoo 
                Valley.
                    (B) Environmental cleanup and site restoration of 
                abandoned wells, farm sites, and safety modifications 
                to the water control structures.
                    (C) Cultural resource activities to meet the 
                requirements of Federal law.
            (2) Participation by state of wisconsin.--In undertaking 
        the completion of the features described in paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary shall determine the requirements of the State of 
        Wisconsin on the location and design of each such feature.
    (d) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996, 
$17,000,000.

SEC. 371. TETON COUNTY, WYOMING.

    Section 840 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4176) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``: Provided, That'' and inserting ``; 
        except that'';
            (2) by striking ``in cash or materials'' and inserting ``, 
        through providing in-kind services or cash or materials,''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following: ``In carrying out 
        this section, the Secretary may enter into agreements with the 
        non-Federal sponsor permitting the non-Federal sponsor to 
        perform operation and maintenance for the project on a cost-
        reimbursable basis.''.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. CORPS CAPABILITY STUDY, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall review the capability of the Corps of Engineers 
to plan, design, construct, operate, and maintain rural sanitation 
projects for rural and Native villages in Alaska. Not later than 18 
months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
transmit findings and recommendations on the agency's capability, 
together with recommendations on the advisability of assuming such a 
mission.

SEC. 402. MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN, ARIZONA.

    The Secretary shall credit the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
feasibility study on the McDowell Mountain project an amount equivalent 
to the cost of work performed by the city of Scottsdale, Arizona, and 
accomplished prior to the city's entering into an agreement with the 
Secretary if the Secretary determines that the work is necessary for 
the study.

SEC. 403. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, ARIZONA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the relationship 
of flooding in Nogales, Arizona, and floodflows emanating from Mexico.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on 
the results of the study conducted under subsection (a), together with 
recommendations concerning the appropriate level of non-Federal 
participation in the project for flood control, Nogales Wash and 
tributaries, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606).

SEC. 404. GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility of 
implementing improvements in the regional flood control system within 
Garden Grove, California.

SEC. 405. MUGU LAGOON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
environmental impacts associated with sediment transport, flood flows, 
and upstream watershed land use practices on Mugu Lagoon, California. 
The study shall include an evaluation of alternatives for the 
restoration of the estuarine ecosystem functions and values associated 
with Mugu Lagoon and the endangered and threatened species inhabiting 
the area.
    (b) Consultation and Coordination.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of the Navy and shall 
coordinate with State and local resource agencies to assure that the 
study is compatible with restoration efforts for the Calleguas Creek 
watershed.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 24 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study.

SEC. 406. SANTA YNEZ, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Planning.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare a comprehensive 
river basin management plan addressing the long term ecological, 
economic, and flood control needs of the Santa Ynez River basin, 
California. In preparing such plan, the Secretary shall consult the 
Santa Barbara Flood Control District and other affected local 
governmental entities.
    (b) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance to the Santa Barbara Flood Control District with respect to 
implementation of the plan to be prepared under subsection (a).

SEC. 407. YOLO BYPASS, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall study the advisability of acquiring land in the 
vicinity of the Yolo Bypass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, 
California, for the purpose of environmental mitigation for the flood 
control project for Sacramento, California, and other water resources 
projects in the area.

SEC. 408. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall provide technical, planning, and design 
assistance to the city of Springfield, Illinois, in developing--
            (1) an environmental impact statement for the proposed 
        development of a water supply reservoir, including the 
        preparation of necessary documentation in support of the 
        environmental impact statement; and
            (2) an evaluation of technical, economic, and environmental 
        impacts of such development.

SEC. 409. BEAUTY CREEK WATERSHED, VALPARAISO CITY, PORTER COUNTY, 
              INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility of 
implementing streambank erosion control measures and flood control 
measures within the Beauty Creek watershed, Valparaiso City, Porter 
County, Indiana.

SEC. 410. GRAND CALUMET RIVER, HAMMOND, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to establish a 
methodology and schedule to restore the wetlands at Wolf Lake and 
George Lake in Hammond, Indiana.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 411. INDIANA HARBOR CANAL, EAST CHICAGO, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of including 
environmental and recreational features, including a vegetation buffer, 
as part of the project for navigation, Indiana Harbor Canal, East 
Chicago, Lake County, Indiana, authorized by the first section of the 
Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).

SEC. 412. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
implementing measures to restore Koontz Lake, Indiana, including 
measures to remove silt, sediment, nutrients, aquatic growth, and other 
noxious materials from Koontz Lake, measures to improve public access 
facilities to Koontz Lake, and measures to prevent or abate the deposit 
of sediments and nutrients in Koontz Lake.

SEC. 413. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the impact of 
the project for flood control, Little Calumet River, Indiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4115), on flooding and water quality in the vicinity of 
the Black Oak area of Gary, Indiana.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study conducted under subsection (a), together with 
recommendations for cost-effective remediation of impacts described in 
subsection (a).
    (c) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the study to 
be conducted under subsection (a) shall be 100 percent.

SEC. 414. TIPPECANOE RIVER WATERSHED, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of water quality 
and environmental restoration needs in the Tippecanoe River watershed, 
Indiana, including measures necessary to reduce siltation in Lake 
Shafer and Lake Freeman.
    (b) Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical, planning, 
and design assistance to the Shafer Freeman Lakes Environmental 
Conservation Corporation in addressing potential environmental 
restoration activities determined as a result of the study conducted 
under subsection (a).

SEC. 415. CALCASIEU SHIP CHANNEL, HACKBERRY, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the need for 
improved navigation and related support service structures in the 
vicinity of the Calcasieu Ship Channel, Hackberry, Louisiana.

SEC. 416. HURON RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the need for 
channel improvements and associated modifications for the purpose of 
providing a harbor of refuge at Huron River, Michigan.

SEC. 417. RIVER DES PERES, SAINT LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
potential flood control measures for the River Des Peres to protect the 
Carondelet and Germania neighborhoods in St. Louis, Missouri. In 
conducting the study, the Secretary shall consider potential storm 
water runoff and related improvements and shall cooperate with the 
Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer District.

SEC. 418. SACO RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flood control problems along 
the Saco River in Hart's Location, New Hampshire, for the purpose of 
evaluating retaining walls, berms, and other structures with a view to 
potential solutions involving repair or replacement of existing 
structures and shall consider other alternatives for flood damage 
reduction.

SEC. 419. BUFFALO RIVER GREENWAY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of a potential greenway trail 
project along the Buffalo River between the park system of the city of 
Buffalo, New York, and Lake Erie. Such study shall include preparation 
of an integrated plan of development that takes into consideration the 
adjacent parks, nature preserves, bikeways, and related recreational 
facilities.

SEC. 420. PORT OF NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY SEDIMENT STUDY.

    (a) Study of Measures To Reduce Sediment Deposition.--The Secretary 
shall conduct a study of measures that could reduce sediment deposition 
in the vicinity of the Port of New York-New Jersey for the purpose of 
reducing the volumes to be dredged for navigation projects in the Port.
    (b) Dredged Material Disposal Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of constructing and operating an 
underwater confined dredged material disposal site in the Port of New 
York-New Jersey which could accommodate as much as 250,000 cubic yards 
of dredged materials for the purpose of demonstrating the feasibility 
of an underwater confined disposal pit as an environmentally suitable 
method of containing certain sediments.
    (c) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on 
the results of the studies conducted under this section, together with 
any recommendations of the Secretary concerning reduction of sediment 
deposition referred to in subsection (a).

SEC. 421. PORT OF NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY NAVIGATION STUDY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of navigation 
needs at the Port of New York-New Jersey to address improvements, 
including deepening of existing channels, that are required to provide 
economically efficient and environmentally sound navigation to meet 
current and future requirements.

SEC. 422. CHAGRIN RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flooding problems along the 
Chagrin River in Eastlake, Ohio. In conducting such study, the 
Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all 
sources, including that resulting from ice jams, and shall evaluate the 
feasibility of a sedimentation collection pit and other potential 
measures to reduce flooding.

SEC. 423. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, ESTUARY.

    The Secretary is authorized to conduct a study of the Charleston 
estuary area located in Charleston, Berkeley, and Dorchester Counties, 
South Carolina, for the purpose of evaluating environmental conditions 
in the tidal reaches of the Ashley, Cooper, Stono, and Wando Rivers and 
the lower portions of Charleston Harbor.

SEC. 424. MUSTANG ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of navigation along the south-
central coast of Texas near Corpus Christi for the purpose of 
determining the feasibility of constructing and maintaining the Packery 
Channel on the southern portion of Mustang Island.

SEC. 425. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flooding, erosion, and other 
water resources problems in Prince William County, Virginia, including 
an assessment of wetlands protection, erosion control, and flood damage 
reduction needs of the County.

SEC. 426. PACIFIC REGION.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct studies in the 
interest of navigation in that part of the Pacific region that includes 
American Samoa, Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The cost sharing provisions of section 105 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215; 100 Stat. 
4088-4089) shall apply to studies under this section.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects are not authorized after 
the date of the enactment of this Act:
            (1) Branford harbor, connecticut.--The following portion of 
        the project for navigation, Branford River, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the first section of the Rivers and Harbors 
        Appropriations Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 333): Starting at 
        a point on the Federal channel line whose coordinates are 
        N156181.32, E581572.38, running south 70 degrees 11 minutes 8 
        seconds west a distance of 171.58 feet to another point on the 
        Federal channel line whose coordinates are N156123.18, 
        E581410.96.
            (2) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The following portion 
        of the project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
        (72 Stat. 297): A 2.4-acre anchorage area, 9 feet deep, and an 
        adjacent 0.6-acre anchorage, 6 feet deep, located on the west 
        side of Johnsons River.
            (3) Guilford harbor, connecticut.--The following portion of 
        the project for navigation, Guilford Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
        authorizing construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
        public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
        approved March 2, 1945 (50 Stat. 13): Starting at a point where 
        the Sluice Creek Channel intersects with the main entrance 
        channel, N159194.63, E623201.07, thence running north 24 
        degrees 58 minutes 15.2 seconds west 478.40 feet to a point 
        N159628.31, E622999.11, thence running north 20 degrees 18 
        minutes 31.7 seconds west 351.53 feet to a point N159957.99, 
        E622877.10, thence running north 69 degrees 41 minutes 37.9 
        seconds east 55.000 feet to a point N159977.08, E622928.69, 
        thence turning and running south 20 degrees 18 minutes 31.0 
        seconds east 349.35 feet to a point N159649.45, E623049.94, 
        thence turning and running south 24 degrees 58 minutes 11.1 
        seconds east 341.36 feet to a point N159340.00, E623194.04, 
        thence turning and running south 90 degrees 0 minutes 0 seconds 
        east 78.86 feet to a point N159340.00, E623272.90.
            (4) Johnsons river channel, bridgeport harbor, 
        connecticut.--The following portion of the project for 
        navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Rivers and 
        Harbors Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634): Northerly of a 
        line across the Federal channel. The coordinates of such line 
        are N 123318.35, E 486301.68 and N 123257.15, E 486380.77.
            (5) Mystic river, connecticut.--The following portion of 
        the project for improving the Mystic River, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the River and Harbor Act approved March 4, 1913 
        (37 Stat. 802):
        Beginning in the 15-foot deep channel at coordinates north 
        190860.82, east 814416.20, thence running southeast about 52.01 
        feet to the coordinates north 190809.47, east 814424.49, thence 
        running southwest about 34.02 feet to coordinates north 
        190780.46, east 814406.70, thence running north about 80.91 
        feet to the point of beginning.
            (6) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--
                    (A) Deauthorization.--The portion of the project 
                for navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
                by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 
                1276), that lies northerly of a line across the Federal 
                channel having coordinates N104199.72, E417774.12 and 
                N104155.59, E417628.96, and those portions of the 6-
                foot deep East Norwalk Channel and Anchorage, 
                authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
                authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation 
                of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
                other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13), 
                not included in the description of the realignment of 
                the project contained in subparagraph (B).
                    (B) Realignment description.--The realigned 6-foot 
                deep East Norwalk Channel and Anchorage is described as 
                follows: starting at a point on the East Norwalk 
                Channel, N95743.02, E419581.37, thence running 
                northwesterly about 463.96 feet to a point N96197.93, 
                E419490.18, thence running northwesterly about 549.32 
                feet to a point N96608.49, E419125.23, thence running 
                northwesterly about 384.06 feet to a point N96965.94, 
                E418984.75, thence running northwesterly about 407.26 
                feet to a point N97353.87, E418860.78, thence running 
                westerly about 58.26 feet to a point N97336.26, 
                E418805.24, thence running northwesterly about 70.99 
                feet to a point N97390.30, E418759.21, thence running 
                westerly about 71.78 feet to a point on the anchorage 
                limit N97405.26, E418689.01, thence running southerly 
                along the western limits of the existing Federal 
                anchorage until reaching a point N95893.74, E419449.17, 
                thence running in a southwesterly direction about 78.74 
                feet to a point on the East Norwalk Channel N95815.62, 
                E419439.33.
                    (C) Redesignation.--All of the realigned channel 
                shall be redesignated as anchorage, with the exception 
                of that portion of the channel which narrows to a width 
                of 100 feet and terminates at a line whose coordinates 
                are N96456.81, E419260.06, and N96390.37, E419185.32, 
                which shall remain as a channel.
            (7) Southport harbor, connecticut.--
                    (A) Deauthorization portion of project.--The 
                following portions of the project for navigation, 
                Southport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first 
                section of the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 30, 
1935 (49 Stat. 1029):
                            (i) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at 
                        the head of the project.
                            (ii) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel 
                        beginning at a bend in the channel whose 
                        coordinates are north 109131.16, east 452653.32 
                        running thence in a northeasterly direction 
                        about 943.01 feet to a point whose coordinates 
                        are north 109635.22, east 453450.31 running 
                        thence in a southeasterly direction about 22.66 
                        feet to a point whose coordinates are north 
                        109617.15, east 453463.98 running thence in a 
                        southwesterly direction about 945.18 feet to 
                        the point of beginning.
                    (B) Remainder.--The remaining portion of the 
                project referred to in subparagraph (A) northerly of a 
                line whose coordinates are north 108699.15, east 
                452768.36 and north 108655.66, east 452858.73 shall be 
                redesignated as an anchorage.
            (8) Stony creek, branford, connecticut.--The following 
        portion of the project for navigation, Stony Creek, 
        Connecticut, authorized under section 107 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577): The 6-foot maneuvering 
        basin starting at a point N157031.91, E599030.79, thence 
        running northeasterly about 221.16 feet to a point N157191.06, 
        E599184.37, thence running northerly about 162.60 feet to a 
        point N157353.56, E599189.99, thence running southwesterly 
        about 358.90 feet to the point of origin.
            (9) York harbor, maine.--That portion of the project for 
        navigation, York Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480), located in the 
        8-foot deep anchorage area beginning at coordinates N 
        109340.19, E 372066.93, thence running north 65 degrees 12 
        minutes 10.5 seconds E 423.27 feet to a point N 109517.71, 
        E372451.17, thence running north 28 degrees 42 minutes 58.3 
        seconds west 11.68 feet to a point N 109527.95, E 372445.56, 
        thence running south 63 degrees 37 minutes 24.6 seconds west 
        422.63 feet returning to the point of beginning and that 
        portion in the 8-foot deep anchorage area beginning at 
        coordinates N 108557.24, E 371645.88, thence running south 60 
        degrees 41 minutes 17.2 seconds east 484.51 feet to a point N 
        108320.04, E 372068.36, thence running north 29 degrees 12 
        minutes 53.3 seconds east 15.28 feet to a point N 108333.38, E 
        372075.82, thence running north 62 degrees 29 minutes 42.1 
        seconds west 484.73 feet returning to the point of beginning.
            (10) Chelsea river, boston harbor, massachusetts.--The 
        following portion of the project for navigation, Boston Harbor, 
        Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
        Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1173), consisting of a 35-foot 
        deep channel in the Chelsea River: Beginning at a point on the 
        northern limit of the existing project N505357.84, E724519.19, 
        thence running northeasterly about 384.19 feet along the 
        northern limit of the existing project to a bend on the 
        northern limit of the existing project N505526.87, E724864.20, 
        thence running southeasterly about 368.00 feet along the 
        northern limit of the existing project to another point 
        N505404.77, E725211.35, thence running westerly about 594.53 
        feet to a point N505376.12, E724617.51, thence running 
        southwesterly about 100.00 feet to the point of origin.
            (11) Cohasset harbor, cohasset, massachusetts.--The 
        following portions of the project for navigation, Cohasset 
        Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized under section 107 of the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
                    (A) The portion starting at a point N453510.15, 
                E792664.63, thence running south 53 degrees 07 minutes 
                05.4 seconds west 307.00 feet to a point N453325.90, 
                E792419.07, thence running north 57 degrees 56 minutes 
                36.8 seconds west 201.00 feet to a point N453432.58, 
                E792248.72, thence running south 88 degrees 57 minutes 
                25.6 seconds west 50.00 feet to a point N453431.67, 
                E792198.73, thence running north 01 degree 02 minutes 
                52.3 seconds west 66.71 feet to a point N453498.37, 
                E792197.51, thence running north 69 degrees 12 minutes 
                52.3 seconds east 332.32 feet to a point N453616.30, 
                E792508.20, thence running south 55 degrees 50 minutes 
                24.1 seconds east 189.05 feet to the point of origin.
                    (B) The portion starting at a point N452886.64, 
                E791287.83, thence running south 00 degrees 00 minutes 
                00.0 seconds west 56.04 feet to a point N452830.60, 
                E791287.83, thence running north 90 degrees 00 minutes 
                00.0 seconds west 101.92 feet to a point, N452830.60, 
                E791185.91, thence running north 52 degrees 12 minutes 
                49.7 seconds east 89.42 feet to a point, N452885.39, 
                E791256.58, thence running north 87 degrees 42 minutes 
                33.8 seconds east 31.28 feet to the point of origin.
                    (C) The portion starting at a point, N452261.08, 
                E792040.24, thence running north 89 degrees 07 minutes 
                19.5 seconds east 118.78 feet to a point, N452262.90, 
                E792159.01, thence running south 43 degrees 39 minutes 
                06.8 seconds west 40.27 feet to a point, N452233.76, 
                E792131.21, thence running north 74 degrees 33 minutes 
                29.1 seconds west 94.42 feet to a point, N452258.90, 
                E792040.20, thence running north 01 degree 03 minutes 
                04.3 seconds east 2.18 feet to the point of origin.
            (12) Falmouth, massachusetts.--
                    (A) Deauthorizations.--The following portions of 
                the project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, 
                Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River 
                and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172):
                            (i) The portion commencing at a point north 
                        199286.37 east 844394.81 a line running north 
                        73 degrees 09 minutes 29 seconds east 440.34 
                        feet to a point north 199413.99 east 844816.36, 
                        thence turning and running north 43 degrees 09 
                        minutes 34.5 seconds east 119.99 feet to a 
                        point north 199501.52 east 844898.44, thence 
                        turning and running south 66 degrees 52 minutes 
                        03.5 seconds east 547.66 feet returning to a 
                        point north 199286.41 east 844394.91.
                            (ii) The portion commencing at a point 
                        north 199647.41 east 845035.25 a line running 
                        north 43 degrees 09 minutes 33.1 seconds east 
                        767.15 feet to a point north 200207.01 east 
                        845560.00, thence turning and running north 11 
                        degrees 04 minutes 24.3 seconds west 380.08 
                        feet to a point north 200580.01 east 845487.00, 
                        thence turning and running north 22 degrees 05 
                        minutes 50.8 seconds east 1332.36 feet to a 
                        point north 201814.50 east 845988.21, thence 
                        turning and running north 02 degrees 54 minutes 
                        15.7 seconds east 15.0 feet to a point north 
                        201829.48 east 845988.97, thence turning and 
                        running south 24 degrees 56 minutes 42.3 
                        seconds west 1410.29 feet returning to the 
                        point north 200550.75 east 845394.18.
                    (B) Redesignation.--The portion of the project for 
                navigation Falmouth, Massachusetts, referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) upstream of a line designated by the 2 
                points north 199463.18 east 844496.40 and north 
                199350.36 east 844544.60 is redesignated as an 
                anchorage area.
            (13) Mystic river, massachusetts.--The following portion of 
        the project for navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 
        (64 Stat. 164): The 35-foot deep channel beginning at a point 
        on the northern limit of the existing project, N506243.78, 
        E717600.27, thence running easterly about 1000.00 feet along 
        the northern limit of the existing project to a point, 
        N506083.42, E718587.33, thence running southerly about 40.00 
        feet to a point, N506043.94, E718580.91, thence running 
        westerly about 1000.00 feet to a point, N506204.29, E717593.85, 
        thence running northerly about 40.00 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (14) Weymouth-fore and town rivers, massachusetts.--The 
        following portions of the project for navigation, Weymouth-Fore 
        and Town Rivers, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized by 
        section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
        1089):
                    (A) The 35-foot deep channel beginning at a bend on 
                the southern limit of the existing project, N457394.01, 
                E741109.74, thence running westerly about 405.25 feet 
                to a point, N457334.64, E740708.86, thence running 
                southwesterly about 462.60 feet to another bend in the 
                southern limit of the existing project, N457132.00, 
                E740293.00, thence running northeasterly about 857.74 
                feet along the southern limit of the existing project 
                to the point of origin.
                    (B) The 15 and 35-foot deep channels beginning at a 
                point on the southern limit of the existing project, 
                N457163.41, E739903.49, thence running northerly about 
                111.99 feet to a point, N457275.37, E739900.76, thence 
                running westerly about 692.37 feet to a point 
                N457303.40, E739208.96, thence running southwesterly 
                about 190.01 feet to another point on the southern 
                limit of the existing project, N457233.17, E739032.41, 
                thence running easterly about 873.87 feet along the 
                southern limit of the existing project to the point of 
                origin.
            (15) Oswegatchie river, ogdensburg new york.--The portion 
        of the Federal channel of the project for navigation, 
        Ogdensburg Harbor, New York, authorized by the first section of 
        the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations Act of June 25, 1910 (36 
        Stat. 635), as modified by the first section of the Rivers and 
        Harbors Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1037), which is in the 
        Oswegatchie River in Ogdensburg, New York, from the 
        southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the 
        northernmost alignment of the Lake Street bridge.
            (16) Apponaug cove, warwick, rhode island.--The following 
        portion of the project for navigation, Apponaug Cove, Rhode 
        Island, authorized under section 101 of the River and Harbor 
        Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480): The 6-foot channel bounded by 
        coordinates N223269.93, E513089.12; N223348.31, E512799.54; 
N223251.78, E512773.41; and N223178.0, E513046.0.
            (17) Port washington harbor, wisconsin.--The following 
        portion of the navigation project for Port Washington Harbor, 
        Wisconsin, authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Appropriations 
        Act of July 11, 1870 (16 Stat. 223): Beginning at the northwest 
        corner of project at Channel Pt. No. 36, of the Federal 
        Navigation Project, Port Washington Harbor, Ozaukee County, 
        Wisconsin, at coordinates N513529.68, E2535215.64, thence 188 
        degrees 31 minutes 59 seconds, a distance of 178.32 feet, 
        thence 196 degrees 47 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 574.80 
        feet, thence 270 degrees 58 minutes 25 seconds, a distance of 
        465.50 feet, thence 178 degrees 56 minutes 17 seconds, a 
        distance of 130.05 feet, thence 87 degrees 17 minutes 05 
        seconds, a distance of 510.22 feet, thence 104 degrees 58 
        minutes 31 seconds, a distance of 178.33 feet, thence 115 
        degrees 47 minutes 55 seconds, a distance of 244.15 feet, 
        thence 25 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds, a distance of 310.00 
        feet, thence 294 degrees 46 minutes 50 seconds, a distance of 
        390.20 feet, thence 16 degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds, a 
        distance of 570.90 feet, thence 266 degrees 01 minutes 25 
        seconds, a distance of 190.78 feet to Channel Pt. No. 36, point 
        of beginning.

SEC. 502. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas.--The 
project for flood control, Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, 
Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
(64 Stat. 174) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (b) White River, Arkansas.--The project for navigation, White River 
Navigation to Batesville, Arkansas, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4139) and 
deauthorized by section 52(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988 (102 Stat. 4045), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.
    (c) Des Plaines River, Illinois.--The project for wetlands 
research, Des Plaines River, Illinois, authorized by section 45 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4041) and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 1001 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (d) Alpena Harbor, Michigan.--The project for navigation, Alpena 
Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (e) Ontonagon harbor, ontonagon county, michigan.--The project for 
navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, Michigan, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 1001 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (f) Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.--The project for navigation, 
Knife River Harbor, Minnesota, authorized by section 100 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41) and deauthorized 
pursuant to section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (g) Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey.--The project for hurricane-flood 
protection and beach erosion control on Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, 
New Jersey, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 118) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to 
be carried out by the Secretary.

SEC. 503. CONTINUATION OF AUTHORIZATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) General Rule.--Notwithstanding section 1001 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) Cedar river harbor, michigan.--The project for 
        navigation, Cedar River Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 
        301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090).
            (2) Cross village harbor, michigan.--The project for 
        navigation, Cross Village Harbor, Michigan, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 
        1405).
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
that begins on the date of the enactment of this Act unless, during 
such period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 504. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal Property, California.--Section 
205 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(3) To adjacent land owners, the United States title to 
        all or portions of that part of the Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal 
        Canal which are located within the boundaries of the city in 
        which such land rests. Such conveyance shall be at fair market 
        value.'';
            (2) by inserting after ``right-of-way'' the following: ``or 
        other rights deemed necessary by the Secretary''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following: ``The conveyances 
        and processes involved will be at no cost to the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Mariemont, Ohio.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the village 
        of Mariemont, Ohio, for a sum of $85,000 all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States in and to a parcel of land 
        (including improvements thereto) under the jurisdiction of the 
        Corps of Engineers and known as the ``Ohio River Division 
        Laboratory'', as such parcel is described in paragraph (4).
            (2) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance under paragraph 
        (1) shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary considers necessary and appropriate to protect the 
        interests of the United States.
            (3) Proceeds.--All proceeds from the conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be deposited in the general fund of the 
        Treasury of the United States and credited as miscellaneous 
        receipts.
            (4) Property description.--The parcel of land referred to 
        in paragraph (1) is the parcel situated in the State of Ohio, 
        County of Hamilton, Township 4, Fractional Range 2, Miami 
        Purchase, Columbia Township, Section 15, being parts of Lots 5 
        and 6 of the subdivision of the dower tract of the estate of 
        Joseph Ferris as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 112, of the Plat 
        Records of Hamilton County, Ohio, Recorder's Office, and more 
        particularly described as follows:
                    Beginning at an iron pin set to mark the 
                intersection of the easterly line of Lot 5 of said 
                subdivision of said dower tract with the northerly line 
                of the right-of-way of the Norfolk and Western Railway 
                Company as shown in Plat Book 27, Page 182, Hamilton 
                County, Ohio, Surveyor's Office, thence with said 
                northerly right-of-way line;
                    South 70 degrees 10 minutes 13 seconds west 258.52 
                feet to a point; thence leaving the northerly right-of-
                way of the Norfolk and Western Railway Company;
                    North 18 degrees 22 minutes 02 seconds west 302.31 
                feet to a point in the south line of Mariemont Avenue; 
                thence along said south line;
                    North 72 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds east 167.50 
                feet to a point; thence leaving the south line of 
                Mariemont Avenue;
                    North 17 degrees 25 minutes 25 seconds west 49.00 
                feet to a point; thence
                    North 72 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds east 100.00 
                feet to a point; thence
                    South 17 degrees 25 minutes 25 seconds east 49.00 
                feet to a point; thence
                    North 72 degrees 34 minutes 35 seconds east 238.90 
                feet to a point; thence
                    South 00 degrees 52 minutes 07 seconds east 297.02 
                feet to a point in the northerly line of the Norfolk 
                and Western Railway Company; thence with said northerly 
                right-of-way;
                    South 70 degrees 10 minutes 13 seconds west 159.63 
                feet to a point of beginning, containing 3.22 acres, 
                more or less.
    (c) Eufaula Lake, Oklahoma.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
        Eufaula, Oklahoma, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 
        12.5 acres located at the Eufaula Lake project.
            (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the parcel (as 
        determined by the Secretary) and payment of all costs of the 
        United States in making the conveyance, including the costs 
        of--
                    (A) the survey required under paragraph (4);
                    (B) any other necessary survey or survey 
                monumentation;
                    (C) compliance with the National Environmental 
                Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and
                    (D) any coordination necessary with respect to 
                requirements relating to endangered species, cultural 
                resources, and clean air (including the costs of agency 
                consultation and public hearings).
            (3) Land surveys.--The exact acreage and description of the 
        parcel to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be determined 
        by such surveys as the Secretary considers necessary, which 
        shall be carried out to the satisfaction of the Secretary.
            (4) Environmental baseline survey.--Prior to making the 
        conveyance under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall conduct an 
        environmental baseline survey to determine the levels of any 
        contamination (as of the date of the survey) for which the 
        United States would be responsible under the Comprehensive 
        Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
        (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) and any other applicable law.
            (5) Conditions concerning rights and easement.--The 
        conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be subject to existing 
        rights and to retention by the United States of a flowage 
        easement over all portions of the parcel that lie at or below 
        the flowage easement contour for the Eufaula Lake project.
            (6) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be subject to such other terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate 
        to protect the interests of the United States.
    (d) Boardman, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
        Boardman, Oregon, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 
        141 acres acquired as part of the John Day Lock and Dam project 
        in the vicinity of such city currently under lease to the 
        Boardman Park and Recreation District.
            (2) Consideration.--
                    (A) Park and recreation properties.--Properties to 
                be conveyed under this subsection that will be retained 
                in public ownership and used for public park and 
                recreation purposes shall be conveyed without 
                consideration. If any such property is no longer used 
                for public park and recreation purposes, then title to 
                such property shall revert to the Secretary.
                    (B) Other properties.--Properties to be conveyed 
                under this subsection and not described in subparagraph 
                (A) shall be conveyed at fair market value.
            (3) Conditions concerning rights and easement.--The 
        conveyance of properties under this subsection shall be subject 
        to existing first rights of refusal regarding acquisition of 
        such properties and to retention of a flowage easement over 
        portions of the properties that the Secretary determines to be 
        necessary for operation of the project.
            (4) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance of 
        properties under this subsection shall be subject to such other 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary considers necessary and 
        appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
    (e) Tri-Cities Area, Washington.--
            (1) General authority.--As soon as practicable after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall make the 
        conveyances to the local governments referred to in paragraph 
        (2) of all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the property described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Property descriptions.--
                    (A) Benton county.--The property to be conveyed 
                pursuant to paragraph (1) to Benton County, Washington, 
                is the property in such county which is designated 
                ``Area D'' on Exhibit A to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-81-
                43.
                    (B) Franklin county, washington.--The property to 
                be conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) to Franklin 
                County, Washington, is--
                            (i) the 105.01 acres of property leased 
                        pursuant to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20 as 
                        executed by Franklin County, Washington, on 
                        April 7, 1977;
                            (ii) the 35 acres of property leased 
                        pursuant to Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to 
                        Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20;
                            (iii) the 20 acres of property commonly 
                        known as ``Richland Bend'' which is designated 
                        by the shaded portion of Lot 1, Section 11, and 
                        the shaded portion of Lot 1, Section 12, 
                        Township 9 North, Range 28 East, W.M. on 
                        Exhibit D to Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to 
                        Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20;
                            (iv) the 7.05 acres of property commonly 
                        known as ``Taylor Flat'' which is designated by 
                        the shaded portion of Lot 1, Section 13, 
Township 11 North, Range 28 East, W.M. on Exhibit D to Supplemental 
Agreement No. 2 to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20;
                            (v) the 14.69 acres of property commonly 
                        known as ``Byers Landing'' which is designated 
                        by the shaded portion of Lots 2 and 3, Section 
                        2, Township 10 North, Range 28 East, W.M. on 
                        Exhibit D to Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to 
                        Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20; and
                            (vi) all levees within Franklin County, 
                        Washington, as of the date of the enactment of 
                        this Act, and the property upon which the 
                        levees are situated.
                    (C) City of kennewick, washington.--The property to 
                be conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) to the city of 
                Kennewick, Washington, is the property within the city 
                which is subject to the Municipal Sublease Agreement 
                entered into on April 6, 1989, between Benton County, 
                Washington, and the cities of Kennewick and Richland, 
                Washington.
                    (D) City of richland, washington.--The property to 
                be conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1), to the city of 
                Richland, Washington, is the property within the city 
                which is subject to the Municipal Sublease Agreement 
                entered into on April 6, 1989, between Benton County, 
                Washington, and the Cities of Kennewick and Richland, 
                Washington.
                    (E) City of pasco, washington.--The property to be 
                conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1), to the city of 
                Pasco, Washington, is--
                            (i) the property within the city of Pasco, 
                        Washington, which is leased pursuant to Army 
                        Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-10; and
                            (ii) all levees within such city, as of the 
                        date of the enactment of this Act, and the 
                        property upon which the levees are situated.
                    (F) Port of pasco, washington.--The property to be 
                conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) to the Port of 
                Pasco, Washington, is--
                            (i) the property owned by the United States 
                        which is south of the Burlington Northern 
                        Railroad tracks in Lots 1 and 2, Section 20, 
                        Township 9 North, Range 31 East, W.M.; and
                            (ii) the property owned by the United 
                        States which is south of the Burlington 
                        Northern Railroad tracks in Lots 1, 2, 3, and 
                        4, in each of Sections 21, 22, and 23, Township 
                        9 North, Range 31 East, W.M.
                    (G) Additional properties.--In addition to 
                properties described in subparagraphs (A) through (F), 
                the Secretary may convey to a local government referred 
                to in subparagraphs (A) through (F) such properties 
                under the jurisdiction of the Secretary in the Tri-
                Cities area as the Secretary and the local government 
                agree are appropriate for conveyance.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) In general.--The conveyances under paragraph 
                (1) shall be subject to such terms and conditions as 
                the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate to 
                protect the interests of the United States.
                    (B) Special rules for franklin county.--The 
                property described in paragraph (2)(B)(vi) shall be 
                conveyed only after Franklin County, Washington, has 
                entered into a written agreement with the Secretary 
                which provides that the United States shall continue to 
                operate and maintain the flood control drainage areas 
                and pump stations on the property conveyed and that the 
                United States shall be provided all easements and 
                rights necessary to carry out that agreement.
                    (C) Special rule for city of pasco.--The property 
                described in paragraph (2)(E)(ii) shall be conveyed 
                only after the city of Pasco, Washington, has entered 
                into a written agreement with the Secretary which 
                provides that the United States shall continue to 
                operate and maintain the flood control drainage areas 
                and pump stations on the property conveyed and that the 
                United States shall be provided all easements and 
                rights necessary to carry out that agreement.
                    (D) Consideration.--
                            (i) Park and recreation properties.--
                        Properties to be conveyed under this subsection 
                        that will be retained in public ownership and 
                        used for public park and recreation purposes 
                        shall be conveyed without consideration. If any 
                        such property is no longer used for public park 
                        and recreation purposes, then title to such 
property shall revert to the Secretary.
                            (ii) Other properties.--Properties to be 
                        conveyed under this subsection and not 
                        described in clause (i) shall be conveyed at 
                        fair market value.
            (4) Lake wallula levees.--
                    (A) Determination of minimum safe height.--
                            (i) Contract.--Within 30 days after the 
                        date of the enactment of this Act, the 
                        Secretary shall contract with a private entity 
                        agreed to under clause (ii) to determine, 
                        within 6 months after such date of enactment, 
                        the minimum safe height for the levees of the 
                        project for flood control, Lake Wallula, 
                        Washington. The Secretary shall have final 
                        approval of the minimum safe height.
                            (ii) Agreement of local officials.--A 
                        contract shall be entered into under clause (i) 
                        only with a private entity agreed to by the 
                        Secretary, appropriate representatives of 
                        Franklin County, Washington, and appropriate 
                        representatives of the city of Pasco, 
                        Washington.
                    (B) Authority.--A local government may reduce, at 
                its cost, the height of any levee of the project for 
                flood control, Lake Wallula, Washington, within the 
                boundaries of such local government to a height not 
                lower than the minimum safe height determined pursuant 
                to subparagraph (A).

SEC. 505. NAMINGS.

    (a) Milt Brandt Visitors Center, California.--
            (1) Designation.--The visitors center at Warm Springs Dam, 
        California, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act 
        of 1962 (76 Stat. 1192), shall be known and designated as the 
        ``Milt Brandt Visitors Center''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the visitors center referred to in paragraph (1) 
        shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Milt Brandt Visitors 
        Center''.
    (b) Carr Creek Lake, Kentucky.--
            (1) Designation.--Carr Fork Lake in Knott County, Kentucky, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
        Stat. 1188), shall be known and designated as the ``Carr Creek 
        Lake''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lake referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed 
        to be a reference to the ``Carr Creek Lake''.
    (c) William H. Natcher Bridge, Maceo, Kentucky, and Rockport, 
Indiana.--
            (1) Designation.--The bridge on United States Route 231 
        which crosses the Ohio River between Maceo, Kentucky, and 
        Rockport, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the 
        ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the bridge referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. Natcher Bridge''.
    (d) John T. Myers Lock and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky.--
            (1) Designation.--Uniontown Lock and Dam, on the Ohio 
        River, Indiana and Kentucky, shall be known and designated as 
        the ``John T. Myers Lock and Dam''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lock and dam referred to in paragraph (1) shall 
        be deemed to be a reference to the ``John T. Myers Lock and 
        Dam''.
    (e) J. Edward Roush Lake, Indiana.--
            (1) Redesignation.--The lake on the Wabash River in 
        Huntington and Wells Counties, Indiana, authorized by section 
        203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 312), and known 
        as Huntington Lake, shall be known and designated as the ``J. 
        Edward Roush Lake''.
            (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lake referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed 
        to be a reference to the ``J. Edward Roush Lake''.
    (f) Russell B. Long Lock and Dam, Red River Waterway, Louisiana.--
            (1) Designation.--Lock and Dam 4 of the Red River Waterway, 
        Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Russell B. 
        Long Lock and Dam''.
            (2) Legal references.--A reference in any law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the lock and dam referred to in paragraph (1) shall 
        be deemed to be a reference to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and 
        Dam''.

SEC. 506. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide technical, 
planning, and design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying 
out watershed management, restoration, and development projects at the 
locations described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided pursuant to subsection 
(a) may be in support of non-Federal projects for the following 
purposes:
            (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
            (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
            (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
        other waterbodies to their natural condition as a means to 
        control flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
            (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including 
        urban watersheds.
            (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural 
        measures to reduce destructive impact of flooding.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under this section shall be 50 percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The Secretary may provide assistance under 
subsection (a) for projects at the following locations:
            (1) Gila River and Tributaries Santa Cruz River, Arizona.
            (2) Rio Salado, Salt River, Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona.
            (3) Colusa basin, California.
            (4) Los Angeles River watershed, California.
            (5) Russian River watershed, California.
            (6) Sacramento River watershed, California.
            (7) Nancy Creek, Utoy Creek, and North Peachtree Creek and 
        South Peachtree Creek basin, Georgia.
            (8) Lower Platte River watershed, Nebraska.
            (9) Juniata River watershed, Pennsylvania, including 
        Raystown Lake.
            (10) Upper Potomac River watershed, Grant and Mineral 
        Counties, West Virginia.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1996.

SEC. 507. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148-4149) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (10);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (11) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Goodyear Lake, Otsego County, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth;
            ``(13) Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and measures to address high nutrient 
        concentration;
            ``(14) Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth;
            ``(15) Skaneateles and Owasco Lakes, New York, removal of 
        silt and aquatic growth and prevention of sediment deposit; and
            ``(16) Twin Lakes, Paris, Illinois, removal of silt and 
        excess aquatic vegetation, including measures to address 
        excessive sedimentation, high nutrient concentration, and 
        shoreline erosion.''.

SEC. 508. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of the non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels constructed or improved by non-Federal interests if 
the Secretary determines that such maintenance is economically 
justified and environmentally acceptable and that the channel was 
constructed in accordance with applicable permits and appropriate 
engineering and design standards:
            (1) Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Fields Landing Channel, 
        California.
            (2) Mare Island Strait, California; except that, for 
        purposes of this section, the navigation channel shall be 
        deemed to have been constructed or improved by non-Federal 
        interests.
            (3) Mississippi River Ship Channel, Chalmette Slip, 
        Louisiana.
            (4) Greenville Inner Harbor Channel, Mississippi.
            (5) Providence Harbor Shipping Channel, Rhode Island.
            (6) Mantagorda Ship Channel, Point Comfort Turning Basin, 
        Texas.
            (7) Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Rincon Canal, Texas.
            (8) Brazos Island Harbor, Texas, connecting channel to 
        Mexico.
            (9) Blair Waterway, Tacoma Harbor, Washington.
    (b) Completion of Assessment.--Within 6 months of receipt of a 
request from the non-Federal interest for Federal assumption of 
maintenance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
make a determination as provided in subsection (a) and advise the non-
Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.

SEC. 509. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4644) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 401. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    ``(a) Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 
        technical, planning, and engineering assistance to State and 
        local governments and nongovernmental entities designated by 
        the State or local government in the development and 
        implementation of remedial action plans for areas of concern in 
        the Great Lakes identified under the Great Lakes Water Quality 
        Agreement of 1978.
            ``(2) Non-federal share.--Non-Federal interests shall 
        contribute, in cash or by providing in-kind contributions, 50 
        percent of costs of activities for which assistance is provided 
        under paragraph (1).
    ``(b) Sediment Remediation Demonstration Projects.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (acting 
        through the Great Lakes National Program Office), may conduct 
        pilot- and full-scale demonstration projects of promising 
        techniques to remediate contaminated sediments in freshwater 
        coastal regions in the Great Lakes basin. The Secretary must 
        conduct no fewer than 3 full-scale demonstration projects under 
        this subsection.
            ``(2) Site selection for demonstration projects.--In 
        selecting the sites for the technology demonstration projects, 
        the Secretary shall give priority consideration to Saginaw Bay, 
        Michigan, Sheboygan Harbor, Wisconsin, Grand Calumet River, 
        Indiana, Ashtabula River, Ohio, Buffalo River, New York, and 
        Duluth/Superior Harbor, Minnesota.
            ``(3) Deadline for identifications.--Within 18 months after 
        the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Secretary 
        shall identify the sites and technologies to be demonstrated 
        and complete each such full-scale demonstration project within 
        3 years after such date of enactment.
            ``(4) Non-federal share.--Non-Federal interests shall 
        contribute 50 percent of costs of projects under this 
        subsection. Such costs may be paid in cash or by providing in-
        kind contributions.
            ``(5) Authorizations.--There is authorized to be 
        appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
        $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1997 through 2000.''.

SEC. 510. GREAT LAKES DREDGED MATERIAL TESTING AND EVALUATION MANUAL.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, shall provide technical assistance to 
non-Federal interests on testing procedures contained in the Great 
Lakes Dredged Material Testing and Evaluation Manual developed pursuant 
to section 230.2(c) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations.

SEC. 511. GREAT LAKES SEDIMENT REDUCTION.

    (a) Great Lakes Tributary Sediment Transport Model.--For each major 
river system or set of major river systems depositing sediment into a 
Great Lakes federally authorized commercial harbor, channel maintenance 
project site, or Area of Concern identified under the Great Lakes Water 
Quality Agreement of 1978, the Secretary, in consultation and 
coordination with the Great Lakes States, shall develop a tributary 
sediment transport model.
    (b) Requirements for Models.--In developing a tributary sediment 
transport model under this section, the Secretary shall--
            (1) build upon data and monitoring information generated in 
        earlier studies and programs of the Great Lakes and their 
        tributaries; and
            (2) complete models for 30 major river systems, either 
        individually or in combination as part of a set, within the 5-
        year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 512. GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES.

    (a) Assessment.--The Secretary shall conduct an assessment of the 
general conditions of confined disposal facilities in the Great Lakes.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the assessment conducted under subsection (a), including the 
following:
            (1) A description of the cumulative effects of confined 
        disposal facilities in the Great Lakes.
            (2) Recommendations for specific remediation actions for 
        each confined disposal facility in the Great Lakes.
            (3) An evaluation of, and recommendations for, confined 
        disposal facility management practices and technologies to 
        conserve capacity at such facilities and to minimize adverse 
        environmental effects at such facilities throughout the Great 
        Lakes system.

SEC. 513. CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION AND PROTECTION PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot program 
to provide to non-Federal interests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed 
technical, planning, design, and construction assistance for water-
related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
development projects affecting the Chesapeake Bay, including projects 
for sediment and erosion control, protection of eroding shorelines, 
protection of essential public works, wastewater treatment and related 
facilities, water supply and related facilities, and beneficial uses of 
dredged material, and other related projects.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned and will be publicly operated and maintained.
    (c) Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
        agreement pursuant to section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (84 Stat. 1818) with a non-Federal interest to provide for 
        technical, planning, design, and construction assistance for 
        the project.
            (2) Requirements.--Each agreement entered into pursuant to 
        this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local 
                officials, of a plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications and an estimate of expected 
                benefits.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to ensure the effective 
                long-term operation and maintenance of the project by 
                the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--Except as provided in paragraph (2)(B), 
        the Federal share of the total project costs of each local 
        cooperation agreement entered into under this section shall be 
        75 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--
                    (A) Provision of lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
                and relocations.--The non-Federal interests for a 
                project to which this section applies shall provide the 
                lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and 
                dredged material disposal areas necessary for the 
                project.
                    (B) Value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations.--In determining the non-Federal 
                contribution toward carrying out a local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this section, the 
                Secretary shall provide credit to a non-Federal 
                interest for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-
                way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas 
                provided by the non-Federal interest, except that the 
                amount of credit provided for a project under this 
                paragraph may not exceed 25 percent of total project 
                costs.
                    (C) Operation and maintenance costs.--The non-
                Federal share of the costs of operation and maintenance 
                of carrying out the agreement under this section shall 
                be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws and Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Nothing in this section waives, limits, or 
        otherwise affects the applicability of any provision of Federal 
        or State law that would otherwise apply to a project carried 
        out with assistance provided under this section.
            (2) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall cooperate with the heads of appropriate Federal 
        agencies.
    (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with a recommendation concerning whether 
or not the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 514. EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission, established 
by the first section of the Act of June 28, 1879 (33 U.S.C. 641; 21 
Stat. 37), is extended to include all of the area between the eastern 
side of the Bayou Lafourche Ridge from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to 
the Gulf of Mexico and the west guide levee of the Mississippi River 
from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 515. ALTERNATIVE TO ANNUAL PASSES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the feasibility of 
implementing an alternative to the $25 annual pass that the Secretary 
currently offers to users of recreation facilities at water resources 
projects of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Annual Pass.--The evaluation under subsection (a) shall include 
the establishment of an annual pass which costs $10 or less for the use 
of recreation facilities at Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
    (c) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the project carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether 
annual passes for individual projects should be offered on a nationwide 
basis.

SEC. 516. RECREATION PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall promote Federal, non-Federal, 
and private sector cooperation in creating public recreation 
opportunities and developing the necessary supporting infrastructure at 
water resources projects of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Infrastructure Improvements.--
            (1) Recreation infrastructure improvements.--In 
        demonstrating the feasibility of the public-private 
        cooperative, the Secretary shall provide, at Federal expense, 
        such infrastructure improvements as are necessary to support a 
        potential private recreational development at the Raystown Lake 
        Project, Pennsylvania, generally in accordance with the Master 
        Plan Update (1994) for the project.
            (2) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
        with an appropriate non-Federal public entity to ensure that 
        the infrastructure improvements constructed by the Secretary on 
        non-project lands pursuant to paragraph (1) are transferred to 
        and operated and maintained by the non-Federal public entity.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $4,500,000 for 
        fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996.
    (c) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the cooperative efforts 
carried out under this section, including the improvements required by 
subsection (b).

SEC. 517. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836-4837) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for providing construction assistance under this section--
            ``(1) $10,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(5);
            ``(2) $2,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(6);
            ``(3) $10,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(7);
            ``(4) $11,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(8);
            ``(5) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(16); and
            ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(17).''.

SEC. 518. CORPS CAPABILITY TO CONSERVE FISH AND WILDLIFE.

    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2263(b); 100 Stat. 4157) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$5,000,000''; and inserting 
        ``$10,000,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4) by inserting ``and Virginia'' after 
        ``Maryland''.

SEC. 519. PERIODIC BEACH NOURISHMENT.

    The Secretary shall carry out periodic beach nourishment for each 
of the following projects for a period of 50 years beginning on the 
date of initiation of construction of such project:
            (1) Broward county, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, segments II and III, Broward County, Florida.
            (2) Fort pierce, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Fort Pierce, Florida.
            (3) Lee county, florida.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida.
            (4) Palm beach county, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Jupiter/Carlin and Ocean Ridge segments, Palm Beach 
        County, Florida.
            (5) Panama city beaches, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Panama City Beaches, Florida.

SEC. 520. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS.

    The Secretary shall carry out under section 104(b) of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610(b))--
            (1) a program to control aquatic plants in Lake St. Claire, 
        Michigan; and
            (2) program to control aquatic plants in the Schuylkill 
        River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 521. NEW ENGLAND DIVISION HEADQUARTERS FACILITY.

    (a) General Authority.--The Secretary may use Plant Replacement and 
Improvement Program funds to design and construct a new headquarters 
facility for the New England Division of the United States Army Corps 
of Engineers.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996, 
$30,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 522. LAKE SUPERIOR CENTER.

    (a) Construction.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
University of Minnesota-Duluth, shall construct an educational facility 
to be used in connection with efforts to educate the public to the 
economic, recreational, biological, aesthetic and spiritual worth of 
Lake Superior and other large bodies of fresh water in general.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--After construction, the Secretary 
shall transfer the facility constructed under this section to the 
University of Minnesota-Duluth. The facility shall be operated and 
maintained by the university.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996, 
$10,000,000 for the construction of the facility under subsection (a).

SEC. 523. EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS CENTER OF EXPERTISE EXTENSION.

    The Secretary shall establish an extension of the Earthquake 
Preparedness Center of Expertise for the central United States at an 
existing district office of the Corps of Engineers near the New Madrid 
fault.

SEC. 524. QUARANTINE FACILITY.

    Section 108(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4816) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$4,000,000''.

SEC. 525. BENTON AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES, ARKANSAS.

    Section 220 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836-4837) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(c) Use of Federal Funds.--The Secretary may make available to 
the non-Federal interests funds not to exceed an amount equal to the 
Federal share of the total project cost to be used by the non-Federal 
interests to undertake the work directly or by contract.''.

SEC. 526. CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, is authorized--
            (1) to conduct investigations and surveys of the watershed 
        of the Lower Mokelume River in Calaveras County, California; 
        and
            (2) to provide technical, planning, and design assistance 
        for abatement and mitigation of degradation caused by abandoned 
        mines and mining activity in the vicinity of such river.

SEC. 527. PRADO DAM SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary, in coordination with the State of California, shall 
provide technical assistance to Orange County, California, in 
developing appropriate public safety and access improvements associated 
with that portion of California State Route 71 being relocated for the 
Prado Dam feature of the project authorized as part of the project for 
flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, by section 401(a) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113).

SEC. 528. TAMPA, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
228 of this Act with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, 
Florida, to provide technical, planning, and design assistance to 
demonstrate the water quality functions found in wetlands, at an 
estimated total Federal cost of $500,000.

SEC. 529. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DEEP RIVER BASIN, INDIANA.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture, shall 
develop a watershed management plan for the Deep River Basin, Indiana, 
which includes Deep River, Lake George, Turkey Creek, and other related 
tributaries in Indiana.
    (b) Contents.--The plan to be developed by the Secretary under 
subsection (a) shall address specific concerns related to the Deep 
River Basin area, including sediment flow into Deep River, Turkey 
Creek, and other tributaries; control of sediment quality in Lake 
George; flooding problems; the safety of the Lake George Dam; and 
watershed management.

SEC. 530. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
in southern and eastern Kentucky. Such assistance may be in the form of 
design and construction assistance for water-related environmental 
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in 
southern and eastern Kentucky, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage, treatment, and 
distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (c) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with such 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities development plan or resource 
                protection plan, including appropriate plans and 
                specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of each such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to assure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--Total project costs under each 
                agreement entered into under this subsection shall be 
                shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-
                Federal, except that the non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
                completed by such interest before entry into the 
                agreement with the Secretary. The Federal share may be 
                in the form of grants or reimbursements of project 
                costs.
                    (B) Credit for certain financing costs.--In the 
                event of delays in the reimbursement of the non-Federal 
                share of a project, the non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for reasonable interest and other 
                associated financing costs necessary for such non-
                Federal interest to provide the non-Federal share of 
                the project's cost.
                    (C) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way.--The non-
                Federal interest shall receive credit for lands, 
                easements, rights-of-way, and relocations provided by 
                the non-Federal interest toward its share of project 
                costs, including for costs associated with obtaining 
                permits necessary for the placement of such project on 
                publicly owned or controlled lands, but not to exceed 
                25 percent of total project costs.
                    (D) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and 
                maintenance costs shall be 100 percent non-Federal.
    (d) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as waiving, limiting, or otherwise affecting 
the applicability of any provision of Federal or State law which would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1999, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether or 
not such program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (f) Southern and Eastern Kentucky Defined.--For purposes of this 
section, the term ``southern and eastern Kentucky'' means Morgan, 
Floyd, Pulaski, Wayne, Laurel, Knox, Pike, Menifee, Perry, Harlan, 
Breathitt, Martin, Jackson, Wolfe, Clay, Magoffin, Owsley, Johnson, 
Leslie, Lawrence, Knott, Bell, McCreary, Rockcastle, Whitley, Lee, and 
Letcher Counties, Kentucky.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 531. LOUISIANA COASTAL WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    Section 303(f) of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and 
Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 3952(f); 104 Stat. 4782-4783) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and (3)'' and inserting 
        ``(3), and (5)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Federal share in calendar years 1996 and 1997.--
        Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), amounts made available 
        in accordance with section 306 of this title to carry out 
        coastal wetlands restoration projects under this section in 
        calendar years 1996 and 1997 shall provide 90 percent of the 
        cost of such projects.''.

SEC. 532. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

    (a) Flood Control.--The Secretary is directed to proceed with 
engineering, design, and construction of projects to provide for flood 
control and improvements to rainfall drainage systems in Jefferson, 
Orleans, and St. Tammany Parishes, Louisiana, in accordance with the 
following reports of the New Orleans District Engineer: Jefferson and 
Orleans Parishes, Louisiana, Urban Flood Control and Water Quality 
Management, July 1992; Tangipahoa, Techefuncte, and Tickfaw Rivers, 
Louisiana, June 1991; and Schneider Canal, Slidell, Louisiana, 
Hurricane Protection, May 1990.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The cost of any work performed by the non-
Federal interests subsequent to the reports referred to in subsection 
(a) and determined by the Secretary to be a compatible and integral 
part of the projects shall be credited toward the non-Federal share of 
the projects.
    (c) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated $40,000,000 
for the initiation and partial accomplishment of projects described in 
the reports referred to in subsection (a).

SEC. 533. RESTORATION PROJECTS FOR MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, WEST 
              VIRGINIA, AND KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with Federal, State, and local 
agencies, is authorized--
            (1) to conduct investigations and surveys of the watersheds 
        of the North Branch of the Potomac River, Maryland, 
        Pennsylvania, and West Virginia; New River, West Virginia; and 
        Pond Creek, Kentucky; and
            (2) to provide technical, planning, and design assistance 
        for abatement and mitigation of surface water quality 
        degradation caused by abandoned mines and mining activity in 
        the vicinity of such rivers and creek.

SEC. 534. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for the beneficial use of 
dredged material at Poplar Island, Maryland, pursuant to section 204 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992; except that the initial 
construction cost of the project shall be $70,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $52,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $17,500,000.

SEC. 535. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, SMITH ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall implement erosion control 
measures in the vicinity of Rhodes Point, Smith Island, Maryland, at an 
estimated total Federal cost of $450,000.
    (b) Implementation on Emergency Basis.--The project under 
subsection (a) shall be carried out on an emergency basis in view of 
the national, historic, and cultural value of the island and in order 
to protect the Federal investment in infrastructure facilities.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing applicable to hurricane and storm 
damage reduction shall be applicable to the project to be carried out 
under subsection (a).

SEC. 536. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL, WORTON POINT, KENT 
              COUNTY, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for the beneficial use of 
dredged material at Worton Point, Kent County, Maryland, pursuant to 
section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992.

SEC. 537. DULUTH, MINNESOTA, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall develop and 
implement alternative methods for decontamination and disposal of 
contaminated dredged material at the Port of Duluth, Minnesota.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996, to 
carry out this section $1,000,000. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 538. REDWOOD RIVER BASIN, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--The Secretary, in cooperation 
with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Minnesota, shall 
conduct a study, and develop a strategy, for using wetland restoration, 
soil and water conservation practices, and nonstructural measures to 
reduce flood damages, improve water quality, and create wildlife 
habitat in the Redwood River basin and the subbasins draining into the 
Minnesota River, at an estimated Federal cost of $4,000,000.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
study and development of the strategy shall be 25 percent and may be 
provided through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Cooperation Agreement.--In conducting the study and developing 
the strategy under this section, the Secretary shall enter into 
cooperation agreements to provide financial assistance to appropriate 
Federal, State, and local government agencies, including activities for 
the implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and water 
conservation measures.
    (d) Implementation.--The Secretary shall undertake development and 
implementation of the strategy authorized by this section in 
cooperation with local landowners and local government officials.

SEC. 539. NATCHEZ BLUFFS, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the project for 
bluff stabilization, Natchez Bluffs, Natchez, Mississippi, 
substantially in accordance with (1) the Natchez Bluffs Study, dated 
September 1985, (2) the Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement I, dated June 
1990, and (3) the Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement II, dated December 
1993, in the portions of the bluffs described in subsection (b), at a 
total cost of $17,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$12,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,300,000.
    (b) Description of Project Location.--The portions of the Natchez 
Bluffs where the project is to be carried out under subsection (a) are 
described in the studies referred to in subsection (a) as--
            (1) Clifton Avenue, area 3;
            (2) the bluff above Silver Street, area 6;
            (3) the bluff above Natchez Under-the-Hill, area 7; and
            (4) Madison Street to State Street, area 4.

SEC. 540. SARDIS LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall work cooperatively with the State of 
Mississippi and the city of Sardis, Mississippi, to the maximum extent 
practicable, in the management of existing and proposed leases of land 
consistent with the master tourism and recreational plan for the 
economic development of the Sardis Lake area prepared by the city.

SEC. 541. COCHECO RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary is directed to provide technical assistance to the 
city of Dover, New Hampshire, in resolving encroachment issues related 
to maintenance dredging of the project for navigation on the Cocheco 
River, New Hampshire.

SEC. 542. DURHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
228 of this Act with the University of New Hampshire to provide 
technical assistance for a water treatment technology center addressing 
the needs of small communities.

SEC. 543. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 324(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4849) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Mitigation, enhancement, and acquisition of 
        significant wetlands that contribute to the Meadowlands 
        ecosystem.''.

SEC. 544. AUTHORIZATION OF DREDGE MATERIAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY FOR 
              PORT OF NEW YORK/NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to construct, operate, 
and maintain a dredged material containment facility with a capacity 
commensurate with the long-term dredged material disposal needs of port 
facilities under the jurisdiction of the Port of New York/New Jersey. 
The costs associated with feasibility studies, design, engineering, and 
construction shall be shared with the local sponsor in accordance with 
the provisions of section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986.
    (b) Beneficial Use.--After the facility to be constructed under 
subsection (a) has been filled to capacity with dredged material, the 
Secretary shall maintain the facility for the public benefit.

SEC. 545. HUDSON RIVER HABITAT RESTORATION, NEW YORK.

    (a) Habitat Restoration Project.--The Secretary shall expedite the 
feasibility study of the Hudson River Habitat Restoration, Hudson River 
Basin, New York, and shall carry out no fewer than 4 projects for 
habitat restoration, to the extent the Secretary determines such work 
to be technically feasible. Such projects shall be designed to--
            (1) provide a pilot project to assess and improve habitat 
        value and environmental outputs of recommended projects;
            (2) provide a demonstration project to evaluate various 
        restoration techniques for effectiveness and cost;
            (3) fill an important local habitat need within a specific 
        portion of the study area; and
            (4) take advantage of ongoing or planned actions by other 
        agencies, local municipalities, or environmental groups that 
        would increase the effectiveness or decrease the overall cost 
        of implementing one of the recommended restoration project 
        sites.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal interests shall provide 25 
percent of the cost on each project undertaken under subsection (a). 
The non-Federal share may be in the form of cash or in-kind 
contributions.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $11,000,000.

SEC. 546. NEW YORK BIGHT AND HARBOR STUDY.

    Section 326(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4851) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$5,000,000''.

SEC. 547. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to make capital 
improvements to the New York State Canal System.
    (b) Agreements.--The Secretary shall, with the consent of 
appropriate local and State entities, enter into such arrangements, 
contracts, and leases with public and private entities as may be 
necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation, 
and maintenance of the New York State Canal System and its related 
facilities, including trailside facilities and other recreational 
projects along the waterways of the canal system.
    (c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the term 
``New York State Canal System'' means the Erie, Oswego, Champlain, and 
Cayuga-Seneca Canals.
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of capital 
improvements under this section shall be 50 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 548. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    (a) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a program 
        for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
        in the New York City Watershed.
            (2) Form.--Assistance provided under this section may be in 
        the form of design and construction assistance for water-
        related environmental infrastructure and resource protection 
        and development projects in the New York City Watershed, 
        including projects for water supply, storage, treatment, and 
        distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection 
        and development.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (c) Eligible Projects.--
            (1) Certification.--A project shall be eligible for 
        financial assistance under this section only if the State 
        director for the project certifies to the Secretary that the 
        project will contribute to the protection and enhancement of 
        the quality or quantity of the New York City water supply.
            (2) Special consideration.--In certifying projects to the 
        Secretary, the State director shall give special consideration 
        to those projects implementing plans, agreements, and measures 
        which preserve and enhance the economic and social character of 
        the watershed communities.
            (3) Project descriptions.--Projects eligible for assistance 
        under this section shall include the following:
                    (A) Implementation of intergovernmental agreements 
                for coordinating regulatory and management 
                responsibilities.
                    (B) Acceleration of whole farm planning to 
                implement best management practices to maintain or 
                enhance water quality and to promote agricultural land 
                use.
                    (C) Acceleration of whole community planning to 
                promote intergovernmental cooperation in the regulation 
                and management of activities consistent with the goal 
                of maintaining or enhancing water quality.
                    (D) Natural resources stewardship on public and 
                private lands to promote land uses that preserve and 
                enhance the economic and social character of the 
                watershed communities and protect and enhance water 
                quality.
    (d) Cooperation Agreements.--Before providing assistance under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation agreement 
with the State director for the project to be carried out with such 
assistance.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--Total project costs under each agreement 
        entered into under this section shall be shared at 75 percent 
        Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by such interest prior to entering into the agreement 
        with the Secretary for a project. The Federal share may be in 
        the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (2) Interest.--In the event of delays in the reimbursement 
        of the non-Federal share of a project, the non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit for reasonable interest costs incurred to 
provide the non-Federal share of a project's cost.
            (3) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for lands, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal 
        interest toward its share of project costs, including direct 
        costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for the 
        placement of such project on public owned or controlled lands, 
        but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and maintenance 
        costs for projects constructed with assistance provided under 
        this section shall be 100 percent non-Federal.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project carried out with assistance provided under 
this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2000, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether 
such program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) New York City Watershed Defined.--For purposes of this section, 
the term ``New York City Watershed'' means the land area within the 
counties of Delaware, Greene, Schoharie, Ulster, Sullivan, Westchester, 
Putnam, and Duchess which contributes water to the water supply system 
of New York City.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000.

SEC. 549. NORTHEASTERN OHIO.

    The Secretary is authorized to provide technical assistance to 
local interests for planning the establishment of a regional water 
authority in northeastern Ohio to address the water problems of the 
region. The Federal share of the costs of such planning shall not 
exceed 75 percent.

SEC. 550. GRAND LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall carry out and complete a 
study of flood control in Grand/Neosho Basin and tributaries in the 
vicinity of Pensacola Dam in northeastern Oklahoma to determine the 
scope of the backwater effects of operation of the dam and to identify 
any lands which the Secretary determines have been adversely impacted 
by such operation or should have been originally purchased as flowage 
easement for the project.
    (b) Acquisition of Real Property.--Upon completion of the study and 
subject to advance appropriations, the Secretary shall acquire from 
willing sellers such real property interests in any lands identified in 
the study as the Secretary determines are necessary to reduce the 
adverse impacts identified in the study conducted under subsection (a).
    (c) Implementation Reports.--The Secretary shall transmit to 
Congress reports on the operation of the Pensacola Dam, including data 
on and a description of releases in anticipation of flooding (referred 
to as preoccupancy releases), and the implementation of this section. 
The first of such reports shall be transmitted not later than 2 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this section $25,000,000 for fiscal years beginning 
        after September 30, 1996.
            (2) Maximum funding for study.--Of amounts appropriated to 
        carry out this section, not to exceed $1,500,000 shall be 
        available for carrying out the study under subsection (a).

SEC. 551. BROAD TOP REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 304 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4840) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
activities conducted under the cooperative agreement entered into under 
subsection (a) shall be 75 percent. The non-Federal share of project 
costs may be provided in the form of design and construction services. 
Non-Federal interests shall receive credit for the reasonable costs of 
such services completed by such interests prior to entering an 
agreement with the Secretary for a project.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c) by striking ``$5,500,000'' and 
        inserting ``$11,000,000''.

SEC. 552. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall carry out a project 
at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Pennsylvania, to make modernization 
and efficiency improvements to the hopper dredge McFarland.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the project under subsection 
(a), the Secretary shall--
            (1) determine whether the McFarland should be returned to 
        active service or the reserve fleet after the project is 
        completed; and
            (2) establish minimum standards of dredging service to be 
        met in areas served by the McFarland while the drydocking is 
        taking place.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1996.

SEC. 553. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Water Works Restoration.--
            (1)) In general.--The Secretary shall provide planning, 
        design, and construction assistance for the protection and 
        restoration of the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Water Works.
            (2) Coordination.--In providing assistance under this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall coordinate with the Fairmount 
        Park Commission and the Secretary of the Interior.
            (3) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        carry out this subsection $1,000,000 for fiscal years beginning 
        after September 30, 1996.
    (b) Cooperation Agreement for Schuylkill Navigation Canal.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
        cooperation agreement with the city of Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania, to participate in the operation, maintenance, and 
        rehabilitation of the Schuylkill Navigation Canal at Manayunk.
            (2) Limitation on federal share.--The Federal share of the 
        cost of the operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation under 
        paragraph (1) shall not exceed $300,000 annually.
            (3) Area included.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
        Schuylkill Navigation Canal includes the section approximately 
        10,000 feet long extending between Lock and Fountain Streets, 
        Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    (c) Schuylkill River Park.--
            (1) Assistance.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 
        technical, planning, design, and construction assistance for 
        the Schuylkill River Park, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
            (2) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        $2,700,000 to carry out this subsection.
    (d) Pennypack Park.--
            (1) Assistance.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 
        technical, design, construction, and financial assistance for 
        measures for the improvement and restoration of aquatic 
        habitats and aquatic resources at Pennypack Park, Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (2) Cooperation agreements.--In providing assistance under 
        this subsection, the Secretary shall enter into cooperation 
        agreements with the city of Philadelphia, acting through the 
        Fairmount Park Commission.
            (3) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated for 
        fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996, $15,000,000 to 
        carry out this subsection.
    (e) Frankford Dam.--
            (1) Cooperation agreements.--The Secretary shall enter into 
        cooperation agreements with the city of Philadelphia, 
        Pennsylvania, acting through the Fairmount Park Commission, to 
        provide assistance for the elimination of the Frankford Dam, 
        the replacement of the Rhawn Street Dam, and modifications to 
        the Roosevelt Dam and the Verree Road Dam.
            (2) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated for 
        fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1996, $900,000, to 
        carry out this subsection.

SEC. 554. SEVEN POINTS VISITORS CENTER, RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall construct a visitors center 
and related public use facilities at the Seven Points Recreation Area 
at Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania, generally in accordance with the Master 
Plan Update (1994) for the Raystown Lake Project.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 555. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal 
interests in southeastern Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the 
form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in southeastern Pennsylvania, including projects for waste 
water treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage, 
treatment, and distribution facilities, and surface water resource 
protection and development.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (c) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with such 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
                    (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal and State 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications.
                    (B) Legal and institutional structures.--
                Establishment of each such legal and institutional 
                structures as are necessary to assure the effective 
                long-term operation of the project by the non-Federal 
                interest.
            (3) Cost sharing.--
                    (A) In general.--Total project costs under each 
                local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
                subsection shall be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 
                percent non-Federal. The non-Federal interest shall 
                receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
                completed by such interest prior to entering into a 
                local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a 
                project. The credit for such design work shall not 
exceed 6 percent of the total construction costs of the project. The 
Federal share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of project 
costs.
                    (B) Interest.--In the event of delays in the 
                funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is 
                the subject of an agreement under this section, the 
                non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                reasonable interest incurred in providing the non-
                Federal share of a project's cost.
                    (C) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--
                The non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
                lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
                its share of project costs, including all reasonable 
                costs associated with obtaining permits necessary for 
                the construction, operation, and maintenance of such 
                project on publicly owned or controlled lands, but not 
                to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
                    (D) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and 
                maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
                assistance provided under this section shall be 100 
                percent non-Federal.
    (d) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as waiving, limiting, or otherwise affecting 
the applicability of any provision of Federal or State law which would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (e) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program 
carried out under this section, together with recommendations 
concerning whether or not such program should be implemented on a 
national basis.
    (f) Southeastern Pennsylvania Defined.--For purposes of this 
section, the term ``Southeastern Pennsylvania'' means Philadelphia, 
Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1996. Such sums shall remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 556. BLACKSTONE RIVER VALLEY, RHODE ISLAND AND MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with Federal, 
State, and local interests, shall provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance in the development and restoration of the Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor, Rhode Island, and 
Massachusetts.
    (b) Federal Share.--Funds made available under this section for 
planning and design of a project may not exceed 75 percent of the total 
cost of such planning and design.

SEC. 557. EAST RIDGE, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall review the flood management study for the East 
Ridge and Hamilton County area undertaken by the Tennessee Valley 
Authority and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible, shall carry out the project, at an estimated total cost of 
$25,000,000.

SEC. 558. MURFREESBORO, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for environmental 
enhancement, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, in accordance with the Report and 
Environmental Assessment, Black Fox, Murfree and Oaklands Spring 
Wetlands, Murfreesboro, Rutherford County, Tennessee, dated August 
1994.

SEC. 559. BUFFALO BAYOU, TEXAS.

    The non-Federal interest for the projects for flood control, 
Buffalo Bayou Basin, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1258), and Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, 
Texas, authorized by section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610), may be reimbursed by up to $5,000,000 or may 
receive a credit of up to $5,000,000 against required non-Federal 
project cost-sharing contributions for work performed by the non-
Federal interest at each of the following locations if such work is 
compatible with the following authorized projects: White Oak Bayou, 
Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, Garners Bayou, and the Upper Reach on 
Greens Bayou.

SEC. 560. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--During any evaluation of economic benefits and 
costs for projects set forth in subsection (b) that occurs after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall not consider 
flood control works constructed by non-Federal interests within the 
drainage area of such projects prior to the date of such evaluation in 
the determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the 
project.
    (b) Specific Projects.--The projects to which subsection (a) apply 
are--
            (1) the project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and 
        Tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 101(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610);
            (2) the project for flood control, Cypress Creek, Texas, 
        authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014); and
            (3) the project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou Basin, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 
        Stat. 1258).

SEC. 561. PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance to Pierce County, Washington, to address measures that are 
necessary to assure that non-Federal levees are adequately maintained 
and satisfy eligibility criteria for rehabilitation assistance under 
section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n; 55 Stat. 
650). Such assistance shall include a review of the requirements of the 
Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989 (Public Law 101-41) 
and standards for project maintenance and vegetation management used by 
the Secretary to determine eligibility for levee rehabilitation 
assistance with a view toward amending such standards as needed to make 
non-Federal levees eligible for assistance that may be necessary as a 
result of future flooding.
    (b) Levee Rehabilitation.--The Secretary shall expedite a review to 
determine the extent to which requirements of the Puyallup Tribe of 
Indians Settlement Act of 1989 limited the ability of non-Federal 
interests to adequately maintain existing non-Federal levees that were 
damaged by flooding in 1995 and 1996 and, to the extent that such 
ability was limited by such Act, the Secretary shall carry out the 
rehabilitation of such levees.

SEC. 562. HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
228 of this Act with Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, to 
provide technical assistance to the Center for Environmental, 
Geotechnical and Applied Sciences.

SEC. 563. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall review the watershed plan and the environmental 
impact statement prepared for the Lower Mud River, Milton, West 
Virginia by the Natural Resources Conservation Service pursuant to the 
Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) 
and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, shall 
carry out the project.

SEC. 564. EVALUATION OF BEACH MATERIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior 
shall evaluate procedures and requirements used in the selection and 
approval of materials to be used in the restoration and nourishment of 
beaches. Such evaluation shall address the potential effects of 
changing existing procedures and requirements on the implementation of 
beach restoration and nourishment projects and on the aquatic 
environment.
    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the evaluation under this section, 
the Secretaries shall consult with appropriate State agencies.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall transmit a report to 
Congress on their findings under this section.

SEC. 565. OHIO RIVER GREENWAY.

    The Secretary is directed to expedite the completion of the study 
for the Ohio River Greenway, Jeffersonville, Clarksville, and New 
Albany, Indiana. Upon completion of the study, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary shall 
participate with the non-Federal interests in the construction of the 
project. Total project costs under this section shall be shared at 50 
percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal. Non-Federal interests shall 
be responsible for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the 
project. The non-Federal interests shall receive credit for costs which 
the Secretary determines are compatible with the study, design, and 
implementation of the project.

SEC. 566. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY TOLLS.

    It is the sense of Congress that the President should engage in 
negotiations with the Government of Canada for the purposes of--
            (1) eliminating tolls along the St. Lawrence Seaway system; 
        and
            (2) identifying ways to maximize the movement of goods and 
        commerce through the St. Lawrence Seaway.
                                 <all>
```