alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 828 

To recognize October 24, 2009, the 20th chartered flight of World War 

II veterans through Louisiana HonorAir, as ‘‘Louisiana HonorAir Day,’’ 

and to honor the invaluable service and dedication of the World War 

II veterans to our Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 14, 2009 

Mr. CAO (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. 

MELANCON, Mr. SCALISE, and Mr. FLEMING) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

To recognize October 24, 2009, the 20th chartered flight 

of World War II veterans through Louisiana HonorAir, 

as ‘‘Louisiana HonorAir Day,’’ and to honor the invaluable service and dedication of the World War II veterans 

to our Nation. 

Whereas in late 2006, T.D. Smith of Louisiana founded Louisiana HonorAir, a nonprofit organization, which charters 

flights for World War II veterans on an all-expenses-paid, 

day-long trip from Louisiana to Washington, DC, to see 

the World War II Memorial, the Marine Corps Memorial, 

and to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier; 

Whereas since its first flight out of Lafayette, Louisiana in 

early 2007, Louisiana HonorAir has flown close to 2,000 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 828 IH 

World War II veterans to Washington, DC, to be honored 

for their invaluable service, sacrifice, and dedication to 

our Nation; 

Whereas approximately 100 to 130 World War II veterans 

are selected by Louisiana HonorAir for each flight on a 

first-come-first-served basis; 

Whereas Louisiana HonorAir is run by volunteers and sustained by donations and State grants; 

Whereas before Louisiana HonorAir culminates in Lafayette, 

Louisiana, on April 10, 2010, its last three flights will be 

chartered from New Orleans, Louisiana, on September 

26, October 10, and October 24, 2009; 

Whereas the 100th chartered flight of World War II veterans 

aboard U.S. Airways occurs during Louisiana HonorAir’s 

October 10, 2009, flight out of New Orleans, Louisiana, 

home to the National World War II Museum; 

Whereas, October 24, 2009, marks the 20th chartered flight 

of World War II veterans through Louisiana HonorAir; 

Whereas with the average World War II veteran being 86 

years old and becoming too ill to visit the World War II 

Memorial in Washington, DC, there are not many opportunities left to honor them for their service: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes Louisiana HonorAir for its 20 chartered flights of 

3 World War II veterans to Washington, DC, to visit the 

4 National World War II Memorial, honors the invaluable 

5 service and dedication of the World War II veterans to 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 828 IH 

1 our Nation, and supports the designation of a ‘‘Louisiana 

2 HonorAir Day’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Mauceli,principal executive officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managinggeneral partner of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m OR 78o(d)); and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Date: August 20, 2007 |   | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.        |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | Managing General Partner                 |
|                  |   |                                     |
|                  |   | By: Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                  |   |                                     |
|                  |   | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli                   |   |
|                  |   | Michael J. Mauceli                       |
|                  |   | Manager and Member                       |
|                  |   | (principal executive officer)            |

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRAINTECH, INC., a Nevada corporation,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

ADIL SHAFI, an individual,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,

v.

FREDERICK WEIDINGER, an individual,

Counterclaim Defendant.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 09-10454

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan

LETTERS ROGATORY

The People of the United States of America, to the Appropriate Judicial Authority

in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

GREETINGS:

WHEREAS, a certain action is pending in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Michigan, in which BRAINTECH is Plaintiff

1

and Adil Shafi, a resident

1

Braintech Inc., was dismissed from the case by order dated June 3, 2010, but remains a party to the

case on the counterclaim of Defendant Shafi.

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 46 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 3
2

of the State of Michigan, is a Defendant, and Frederick Weidinger is an additional party

counterclaim defendant and a resident of the State of Virginia.

WHEREAS, it having been made known to us that the testimony of the following

witness of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, to-wit: Babak Habibi, 1680 Orkney

Pl, North Vancouver, BC V7h 2Z1, is necessary for use at the trial of the issues in said

action and without the testimony of whom justice cannot be completely done between

the parties;

WE, THEREFORE REQUEST that in furtherance of justice, you will cause said

witnesses, to appear before the person authorized to administer oaths at the offices of

Ellis Business Lawyers #440-319 West Pender Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 1T3, or some

other place as agreed by the parties, at a precise time and place by you to be fixed, and

there to answer, under oaths or affirmations, the questions, document requests and

interrogatories to be propounded by counsel for the respective parties and said

questions and answers to be committed and reduced to writing, and thereafter duly

signed by said witnesses under oath or affirmation, and thereafter return said deposition

to us under cover, duly closed and sealed, postage prepaid, together with these

presents, addressed to David J. Weaver, Clerk of the Court, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Michigan, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette

Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America 48226, with copies to counsel

for the parties.

And we shall be ready and willing to do the same for you in a similar case when

required.

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 46 Filed 10/12/10 Page 2 of 3
3

WITNESS the Honorable Victoria A. Roberts, United States District Court Judge

for the Eastern District of Michigan, United States of America, on this ___ day of

October, 2010.

_______________________________

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 46 Filed 10/12/10 Page 3 of 3
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTEMES, SA, 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Claim Defendant, 

 Case No. 09-cv-10534 

v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

KEITH CHILDRESS, 

 Defendant/Counter-Claim Plaintiff. 

__________________________________________________________________/ 

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR 

RECONSIDERATION (ECF Nos. 607, 608) 

On July 31, 2023, Plaintiff Dassault Systemes, SA and Defendant Keith 

Childress each filed motions for reconsideration in this action. (See Dassault Mot., 

ECF No. 607; Childress Mot., ECF No. 608.) The Court held a hearing on both 

motions on December 19, 2023. 

 For the reasons explained on the record during the December 19 hearing, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED that both parties’ motions are DENIED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: December 20, 2023 

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 619, PageID.23191 Filed 12/20/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the 

parties and/or counsel of record on December 20, 2023, by electronic means and/or 

ordinary mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 619, PageID.23192 Filed 12/20/23 Page 2 of 2
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-16-00329- CV In re Daniel Alan Sl iger ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe nding pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. 1

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Filed: Jul y

1, 2016

See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) . 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-11027

v.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

LADONNIS BYERS,

Defendant,

and

DETROIT CENTRAL CITY COMMUNITY 

MENTAL HEALTH, INCORPORATED,

Garnishee.

_____________________________________/

ORDER REGARDING PAYMENT PLAN

On March 19, 2009, plaintiff filed this action seeking to recover student loan debt

allegedly owed by defendant. On April 1, 2009, the court entered an order for entry of

consent judgment with partial payment provisions. The order enters judgment in favor

of plaintiff in the amount of $4,040.23 and provides defendant may satisfy the judgment

by making monthly payments of $65.00 starting April 16, 2009. On January 19, 2012,

plaintiff filed an application for writ of continuing garnishment as to garnishee Michigan

Department of Treasury. The same day, plaintiff filed an application for writ of

continuing garnishment as to garnishee Detroit Central City Community Mental Health,

Incorporated. On February 1, 2012, defendant filed a request for hearing. She states

she has been making payments and is willing to increase her payment amount. On

2:09-cv-11027-GCS-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 02/09/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 61
2

February 7, 2012, plaintiff filed a response to defendant’s request for hearing. In its

response, plaintiff “welcomes the opportunity to discuss the matter with Defendant, and

invites Defendant to contact its attorneys to discuss reinstituting a reasonable payment

arrangement on this debt.” Plaintiff also states a hearing on this matter would be a

waste of judicial time and resources since defendant has offered no valid exemption or

defense to the garnishment. The court orders the parties to discuss a payment plan

within 45 days of the date of this order and to report the results of that conference to this

court by April 2, 2012. At that time, the court will determine whether a hearing is

necessary on the garnishment issue.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 9, 2012

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys/parties of record on January 9, 2012 by electronic

and/or ordinary mail, and upon Ladonnis Byers at 163 Manchester Parkway, Highland Park, MI 48203.

s/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11027-GCS-RSW Doc # 19 Filed 02/09/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 62
#### Leroy STAINBACK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67775.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 21, 1995.

Douglas R. Hoff, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17366]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

agency: Overseas Private Investment Corporation, IDCA.

action: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the Agency is preparing an 
information collection request for OMB review and approval and to 
request public review and comment on the submission. Comments are being 
solicited on the need for the information, its practical utility, the 
accuracy of the Agency's burden estimate, and on ways to minimize the 
reporting burden, including automated collection techniques and uses of 
other forms of technology. The proposed form under review is summarized 
below.

dates: Comments must be received by no later than September 9, 1996.

addresses: Copies of the subject form and the request for review 
prepared for submission to OMB may be obtained from the Agency 
Submitting Officer. Comments on the form should be submitted to the 
Agency Submitting Officer.

for further information contact: OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Lena 
Paulsen, Manager, Information Center, Overseas Private Investment 
Corporation, 1100 New York Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20527; 202/
336-8565.

Summary of Form Under Review

    Type of Reqeuest: Renewal of an existing form.
    Title: Foreign Shareholder Disclosure Report--In Support of an 
Application for Financing.
    Form Number: OPIC 139.
    Frequency of Use: Once per each non-U.S. sponsor per project.
    Type of Respondents: Individuals, Business, or other institutions.
    Standard Industrial Classification Codes: All.
    Description of Affected Public: Non-U.S. Companies or Individuals 
investing in any project financing by OPIC.
    Reporting Hours: two hours per response
    Number of Responses: 70 per year.
    Federal Cost: $2,625
    Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231 and 234 (b) and 
(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The Foreign Shareholder Disclosure 
Report--In Support of an Application for Financing, requests 
information as required per OPIC's governing legislation. Such 
information is needed to determine whether a project and its non-U.S. 
sponsor meet eligibility criteria for OPIC financing, specifically with 
regard to effects on the U.S. economy.
    Dated: July 2, 1996.
James R. Offutt,
Assistant General Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-17366 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
**Exhibit 32.1****DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP.****OFFICERS’ CERTIFICATE**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Dana W. Kammersgard, the Chief Executive Officer of Dot Hill SystemsCorp. (the “Company”), and Hanif I. Jamal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act; and     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by thePeriodic Report.**In Witness whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 16th day ofMarch, 2007.   /s/ Dana W. Kammersgard /s/ Hanif I. Jamal   Dana W. Kammersgard*Chief Executive Officer* Hanif I. Jamal*Chief Financial Officer*     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “SEC”) or its staff upon request.     This certification “accompanies” the Periodic Report, is not deemed filed with the SEC and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the PeriodicReport), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

          Certification required by Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of
                Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

In connection  with the report of Vasogen Inc. (the  "Company") on the Form 40-F
for the fiscal year ending  November 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, David G.  Elsley,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.


/s/ David G. Elsley
----------------------------------------
David G. Elsley
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Vasogen Inc.

February 21, 2006
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2






March 1, 2001



MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc. and The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc. (the Companies), both wholly owned
subsidiaries of The CIT Group, Inc., have complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for
this same period, the Companies have in effect a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy in the amount of not less than $60 million and $6.5 million,
respectively.

                                 The CIT Group/Consumer Finance, Inc.
                                 The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.



                                 /s/ William L. Schumm
                                 --------------------------------------

                                 William L. Schumm
                                 Executive Vice President
                                 Chief Credit Officer
                                 North American Servicing



                                 /s/ Kenneth P. Reynolds
                                 --------------------------------------
                                 Kenneth P. Reynolds
                                 Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                                                                       Exhibit I


                  Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                      with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 23, 2004

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc. (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc., has complied
in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, CIT Group Inc. had in effect a financial
institution bond, computer crime policy and error and omissions policy in the
following amounts:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Insurance Type                           Coverage
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial institution bond                          $60 million
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer crime policy                               $60 million
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Errors and omissions                                $10 million
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ Ron G. Arrington
-------------------------------------------------
Ron G. Arrington
President
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.

/s/ William L. Schumm
-------------------------------------------------
William L. Schumm
Executive Vice President
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.

/s/ Kenneth P. Reynolds
-------------------------------------------------
Kenneth P. Reynolds
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 44229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17453]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 22, 2008, a 30-day notice (Vol. 73, Number 141, page 
42552) was published for the information collection, Family Educational 
Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) Regulatory Requirements. In that notice 
1,666,013 responses were provided. This correction notice provides the 
correct number of responses as 19,958,860. The burden hours remain the 
same at approximately 1,666,014 hours.
    The Acting IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management 
Services, Office of Management, hereby issues a correction notice as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Kate Mullan,
Acting Leader, Information Policy and Standards Team, Regulatory 
Information Management Services, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. E8-17453 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P