alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1211 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1211

                      One Hundred Eleventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the sixth day of January, two thousand and nine

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  60 School Street, Orchard Park, New York, as the ``Jack F. Kemp Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JACK F. KEMP POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 60 School Street, Orchard Park, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jack F. Kemp Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jack F. 
Kemp Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 115-5    Filed 06/16/11   Pg 1 of 1    Pg ID 2922
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16107]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee; Open Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a 
meeting of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee 
(COMSTAC). The meeting will take place on Thursday, July 25, 1996, from 
8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. in Room 2230 of the Department of 
Transportation's Headquarters building at 400 Seventh Street, SW, in 
Washington, D.C. This will be the twenty-third meeting of the COMSTAC.
    The agenda for the meeting will include reports from the respective 
COMSTAC Working Groups; a legislative update on Congressional 
activities involving commercial space transportation; an activities 
report from FAA's Associate Administrator for Commercial Space 
Transportation (formerly the Office of Commercial Space Transportation 
[60 FR 62762, December 7, 1995]); and other related topics.
    The meeting is open to the public; however, space may be limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda Parker, (AST-100), Associate 
Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation, 400 7th Street SW, 
Room 5415, Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-2932.

    Dated: June 19, 1996.
Frank C. Weaver,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 96-16107 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### Leonard KIRBERG, as Trustee of the Horner and Shifrin, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Erwin R. BREIHAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 65376.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

April 25, 1995.

Gary H. Feder, Ziereher & Hocker, P.C., Clayton, for appellant.

Nicholas J. Lamb, Roger A. Keller, Jr., Thompson & Mitchell, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and AHRENS and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Erwin R. Breihan, appeals the judgment of the trial court, in a court-tried case, in favor of plaintiff, Leonard Kirberg, as Trustee of the Horner & Shifrin, Inc., Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, in plaintiffs action for declaratory judgment to interpret terms of a tender offer to purchase defendant’s stock upon retirement from a closely held engineering company and on defendant’s counterclaim seeking reformation of the tender offer.

We have reviewed the record and find that there was substantial evidence to support the judgment of the trial court; no error of law appears. *See Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Diane S. Button, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cactus Ventures, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 28, 2010  /s/ Diane S. Button Diane S. Button President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cactus Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Cactus Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17102]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Air Cargo Expediters Inc., 167-17 146th Road, Jamaica, NY 11434. 
Officers: Harry J. Phieffer, President; John R. Phieffer, Vice 
President.
Southern International Cargo, Inc., 10131 S.W. 33rd Street, Miami, FL 
33165. Officer: Ana Gamarra, President.
Genesis Forwarding Group USA, Inc., 808 Hindry Avenue, Unit E, 
Inglewood, CA 90301. Officer: Mo-Ling Mary Goon, Assistant Secretary.
Transcargo International, 5155 Rosecrans Ave., Suite 110, Hawthorne, CA 
90250. Mario F. Chavarria, Sole Proprietor.
NG Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Randy International Ltd., 590 Belleville 
Turnpike, Building 26, Kearny, NJ 07032. Officers: Norman Greif, 
President; Alice F. Sciara, Vice President.

    Dated: June 28, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-17102 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE NORAM
ENERGY CORP. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001042773
<NAME> NORAM ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,702,489
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  2,220,252
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,147,299
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        69,056
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,139,096
<COMMON>                                             1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    2,463,831
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             20,847
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               2,479,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           937,993
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      712,100
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  232,145
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,777,813
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,139,096
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    5,858,390
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            55,781
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   5,612,594
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   5,612,594
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        245,796
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               9,453
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 255,249
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       132,746
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,959
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   66,959
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,070
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         156,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 

 
 



 
 August 16, 2012 
 TV18 HSN Holdings Limited 
 Diomidous, 10 ALPHAMEGA
AKROPOLIS BUILDING, 
 3rd floor, Flat/Office 401, P.C 2024, 

Nicosia, Cyprus 
 Dear Sirs, 
 We, Network18 Media & Investments Limited, as the majority shareholder of TV18
HSN Holdings Limited, Cyprus, hereby irrevocably agree that we shall, in the event that TV18 HSN Holdings Limited, Cyprus fails to arrange the required finances by itself, directly provide to your Indian subsidiary, TV18 Home Shopping Network
Limited, such financial support as is necessary to enable TV18 Home Shopping Network Limited to fulfill its business obligations in all material respects for a period of up to 12 months from the date of this letter. 

This letter is intended to be legally binding and shall be governed by Laws of India. 

Thanking you, 
 Yours faithfully 
 For Network18 Media & Investments
Limited 
 /s/ R.D.S Bawa 
 R.D.S Bawa 
 Group CFO-Network18 

Network18 Media & Investments Limited 

Regd. office: 503, 504 & 507, 5th Floor, Mercantile House, 15 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi- 110 001 

Corp. office: Express Trade Tower, Plot No. 15-16, Sector 16A, Noida, Uttar Pradesh- 201 301 

Tel # 95-120- 4341818, fax # 95-120- 4324110
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  September  30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Jeffery E. Jones, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 29, 2007



                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                Secretary/Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Willie H. Smith,

Plaintiff, Case No. 08-14308

v. Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds

Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp., 

First Property Financial, Inc., and

Mortgage Electronic Registration 

Systems, Inc.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the

pleadings, including the Report and Recommendation and any objections thereto, the Court

hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is

further ordered that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the case is

hereby DISMISSED pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and res judicata.

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: May 29, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on May 29, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14308-NGE-DAS Doc # 29 Filed 05/29/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 240
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IVAN VON STAICH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Governor of California; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-16390

D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01235-GEBGGH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Ivan Von Staich, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his action alleging defendants violated the Religious

Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (“RLUIPA”) by considering

FILED

OCT 12 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16390

grooming violations during his parole hearings. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s summary judgment. San

Jose Christian Coll. v. City of Morgan Hill, 360 F.3d 1024, 1029 (9th Cir. 2004). 

We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to

amend. Chappel v. Lab. Corp. of Am., 232 F.3d 719, 725 (9th Cir. 2000). We may

affirm on any basis supported by the record. Dittman v. California, 191 F.3d 1020,

1027 n.3 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment to the defendants

because, as a result of a settlement in another case, Von Staich had all recent

grooming violations removed from his central file, and the consideration of his

earlier violations did not impose a substantial burden on his religious exercise. See

San Jose Christian Coll., 360 F.3d at 1034 (“[A] substantial burden on religious

exercise must impose a significantly great restriction or onus upon such exercise.”)

(internal quotation marks omitted); cf. Warsoldier v. Woodford, 418 F.3d 989, 996

(9th Cir. 2005) (finding a substantial burden because the grooming policy put

pressure on inmates to abandon their religious beliefs).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Von Staich’s

motion to file a Fourth Amended Complaint after properly finding undue delay and
3 09-16390

prejudice to the defendants. See Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Network Solutions, Inc.,

194 F.3d 980, 986 (9th Cir. 1999).

Von Staich’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and OMB Control Number: Reception Day Questionnaire.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Number of Respondents: 1,343.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 1,343.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 336.
    Needs and Uses: The information collected by this questionnaire is 
utilized by the U.S. Military Academy to improve the support provided 
parents of cadets who attend this activity. Questions relate to parent 
experiences during the event and their insights into necessary 
improvements. The answers are used to evaluate activities and services 
provided to parents and to make changes deemed advisable.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: June 28, 1996.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-16995 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2821-2822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1551]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5408-4]


Notice of Rechartering of the Local Government Advisory Committee

    The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Local Government 
Advisory Committee (LGAC) has been rechartered through December 31, 
1997, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, and in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA). The purpose of the LGAC is to provide authoritative analysis 
and advice to the EPA Administrator regarding how to achieve more 
effective and efficient implementation of Federal environmental 
programs by local governments. The Committee membership is balanced 
with representation from Local and State government officials, 
Congressional staff, environmental interest groups, and labor unions.

 
[[Page 2822]]

    Dated: January 22, 1996.
Shelley H. Metzenbaum,
Associate Administrator, Office of Regional Operations and State/Local 
Relations.
[FR Doc. 96-1551 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### Harry A SPRING, Appellant, v. Linda BOLLEN, et al., Appellees.

No. 10-96-070-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco.

Aug. 30, 1996.

Rehearing Overruled Oct. 2, 1996.

*781Steven E. Rogers, Alan L. Busch, Law Offices of Alan L. Busch, P.C., Dallas, Robert A. “Bob” Gammage, Austin, for appellant.

Thomas G. Farrier and Len A. Wade, Murphy, Mahon, Keffler & Farrier, L.L.P., Fort Worth, John MacLean and Terri Wilson, MacLean & Boulware, Cleburne, for appellees.

Before DAVIS, C.J., and CUMMINGS and VANCE, JJ.

OPINION

VANCE, Justice.

Harry Spring and his attorney, Steven Rogers, (Appellants) seek relief from an interlocutory temporary injunction ordering (1) Spring and Rogers to deposit certain funds in the Johnson County district clerk’s registry and (2) Rogers to turn over his “Oil Suit legal file” pending determination of privilege and discovery issues.

The bond and record were timely filed. Tex.R.App. P. 42(a)(3). Appellants filed a motion to extend the time to file their brief, saying that although the court reporter had been paid in full, they had not received a copy of the statement of facts. Linda Bollen (Appellee) controverted the motion, supported by an affidavit of the court reporter. The court reporter avers that the copy of the statement of facts was ready on April 8, the date it was filed with this court. Although she communicated this to Appellants on that date, she was not paid for the copy until April 30. Following our decision in *City of Beverly Hills v. Guevara,*we denied the motion for extension of time. 886 S.W.2d 833, 834-35 (Tex.App.—Waco 1994) (unlike Rule 54(c), Rule 42 has no specific mechanism for extensions of time to file record and briefs in accelerated appeals), *rev’d on other grounds,*904 S.W.2d 655 (Tex.1995).

Appellants then filed a motion asking us to consider their late-filed brief. We did not act on this motion, but scheduled the case for oral argument. Because we can determine from the record that Appellants failed to “reasonably explain” their failure to timely file their brief, we now deny the motion. Tex.R.App. P. 42(a)(3).

We cannot reverse for unassigned error. *Allright, Inc. v. Pearson,*735 S.W.2d 240, 240 (Tex.1987). Because Appellants’ brief was not timely filed and cannot be considered because the failure was not reasonably explained, we have no assignments of error. The order granting the temporary injunction is affirmed. Tex.R.App. P. 42(a)(3), 60.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of iLinc Communications, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report). I, James M.
Powers, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




By: /s/ James M. Powers, Jr.
    ------------------------
James M. Powers, Jr.,
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
June 29, 2007