32924 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

published in the Federal Register on

February 20, 1996, shall be and are the

terms and provisions of this order

amending the order and are set forth in

full herein.

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985

Marketing agreements, Oils and fats,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Spearmint oil.

For the reasons set forth in the

preamble, 7 CFR Part 985 is amended as

follows:

PART 985—MARKETING ORDER

REGULATING THE HANDLING OF

SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE

FAR WEST

1. The authority citation for 7 CFR

Part 985 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.

2. Section 985.5 is revised to read as

follows:

§ 985.5 Production area.

Production area means all the area

within the States of Washington, Idaho,

Oregon, and that portion of Nevada

north of the 37th parallel and that

portion of Utah west of the 111th

meridian. The area shall be divided into

the following districts:

(a) District 1. State of Washington

(b) District 2. The State of Idaho and

that portion of the States of Nevada and

Utah included in the production area.

(c) District 3. The State of Oregon.

Dated: June 19, 1996.

Michael V. Dunn,

Assistant Secretary, Marketing and

Regulatory Programs.

[FR Doc. 96–16303 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

8 CFR PARTS 3 AND 242

[EOIR 102F]

RIN 1125–AA01

Executive Office for Immigration

Review; Motions and Appeals in

Immigration Proceedings; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Justice.

ACTION: Correction to final regulation.

SUMMARY: This document contains

additional corrections to the final

regulation published Monday, April 29,

1996 (61 FR 18900), relating to new

motions and appeals procedures in

immigration proceedings.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Margaret M. Philbin, General Counsel,

Executive Office for Immigration

Review, Suite 2400, 5107 Leesburg Pike,

Falls Church, VA 22041, (703) 305–0470

(not a toll free call).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The final regulation that is the subject

of these corrections streamlines the

motions and appeals practice before the

Board of Immigration Appeals and

establishes a centralized procedure for

filing notices of appeal, fees, fee waiver

requests, and briefs directly with the

Board. The new regulation also

establishes time and number limitations

on motions to reconsider and on

motions to reopen and makes certain

changes to appellate procedures to

reflect the statutory directives of section

545 of the Immigration Act of 1990

(Pub. L. 101–649, 104 stat. at 4978).

Need for Correction

As published, the final regulation

contains errors that may prove to be

misleading and are in need of

clarification.

Correction of Publication

Accordingly, the publication on April

29, 1996 of the final regulation (EOIR

102F), which was the subject of FR Doc.

96–10157 is corrected as follows:

§ 3.2(b) [Corrected]

1. On page 18904, in the third

column, in § 3.2 paragraph (b), line 13,

the word ‘‘shall’’ is corrected to read

‘‘may’’ and in line 17, the last sentence

of the paragraph is corrected to read

‘‘Such motion may be consolidated

with, and considered by the Board in

connection with the appeal to the

Board.’’

§ 246.7 [Corrected]

2. On page 18910, in the first column,

§ 246.7, line 4, the following language is

removed: ‘‘except that no appeal shall

lie from an order of deportation entered

in absentia’’.

Rosemary Hart,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–16270 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Customs Service

19 CFR Parts 102 and 134

Country of Origin Marking Exception

for Textile Goods Assembled Abroad

With Components Only Cut to Shape in

the U.S.

AGENCY: U.S. Customs Service,

Department of the Treasury.

ACTION: General policy statement.

SUMMARY: This notice advises the public

of a general country of origin marking

exception that will be granted by

Customs, commencing July 1, 1996, for

imported textile goods assembled

abroad with components which were

only cut to shape in the United States.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Craig Walker, Special Classification and

Marking Branch, Office of Regulations

and Rulings (202–482–6980).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On September 5, 1995, Customs

published in the Federal Register (60

FR 46188) a final rule document setting

forth, in section 102.21, Customs

Regulations (19 CFR 102.21), new rules

of origin applicable to textile and

apparel products. These rules, which

become effective July 1, 1996,

implement the provisions of section 334

of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act

(‘‘the Act’’) (codified at 19 U.S.C. 3592).

One of the fundamental changes that

will result from the new textile rules of

origin is that cutting fabric to shape will

no longer confer origin. Currently (prior

to July 1, 1996), the cutting of foreign

fabric to shape in the U.S. results in the

components becoming products of the

U.S. If these components are assembled

abroad and returned, they are entitled to

a duty allowance under subheading

9802.00.80, HTSUS, and pursuant to the

regulations (19 CFR 10.22, which will

be eliminated effective August 5, 1996),

they may be marked ‘‘Assembled in X

country from U.S. components’’ or a

similar phrase. However, under the new

textile rules, these fabric components

will no longer be of U.S. origin.

Therefore, while the Act provides that

importers may continue to receive a

duty allowance for components cut to

shape in the U.S. from foreign fabric and

assembled abroad, effective July 1, 1996,

such assembled goods will no longer be

considered properly marked when they

are labeled ‘‘Assembled in X country

from ‘U.S.’ components.’’