alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3676 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.3676

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the intent of Congress 
           with respect to the Federal carjacking prohibition.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Carjacking Correction Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF INTENT OF CONGRESS IN FEDERAL CARJACKING 
              PROHIBITION.

    Section 2119(2) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, including any conduct that, if the conduct occurred in 
the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, 
would violate section 2241 or 2242 of this title'' after ``(as defined 
in section 1365 of this title''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Rahn Sherwyn HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48663.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 28, 1994.

Laura G. Martin, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and BERREY and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rahn Sherwyn Hall appeals dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for untimely filing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dr. Amnon Gonenne, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of MabCure Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      three month period ended March 31, 2010, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

|By:    | /s/ Dr. Amnon Gonenne                                 | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Dr. Amnon Gonenne                                     | 
|Title: | President, Chief Executive
      Officer and Director | 
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|Date:  | May 14, 2010                                          | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1 1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

CERTIFICATE OF PAUL J. CAMBRIA,

JR., IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT

MICHAEL LACEY'S MOTION FOR

DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS

RELATED TO CARL FERRER'S

WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE

STATE OF NEW YORK )

COUNTY OF ERIE ) ss.:

CITY OF BUFFALO )

Paul J. Cambria, Jr., Esq., being duly sworn, certifies that:

1) I ain an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of New

York and am a partner in the law firm of Lipsitz Green Sciine Cambria LLP, located at 42

Delaware Avenue, Suite 300, Buffalo, New York, attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey. I

was admitted to this Court pro hac vice for the instant prosecution.

2) I make this certificate based on personal knowledge and in support of

Defendant Michael Lacey's Motion for Disclosure of Documents Related to Carl Ferrer's

Waiver of Privilege ("Defendant's Motion).

3) As set forth in greater detail in the Memorandum of Points and

Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion, on May 1, 2018, Michael Piccarreta, counsel

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 200-7 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1 1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

for Andrew Padilla, requested the government to provide defendants with prompt disclosure

of all documents related to Mr. Ferrer's waiver of privilege.

4) The government declined this request.

5) Mr. Piccarreta personally consulted with the government in a good faith

and sincere effort to resolve this discovery dispute without the filing of a motion.

6) Unfortunately, the parties have reached an impasse and are unable to

reach a satisfactory resolution of these discovery demand. In light of this impasse, it was

necessary to file Defendant's Motion with this Court.

7) I therefore certify, pursuant to LRCrim 12.1 and LRCiv 7.2(j), that after

personal consultation and sincere efforts to do so, counsel have been unable to satisfactorily

resolve this matter.

DATED: June 28, 2018 Respectfully Submitted,

LIl'SITZ GREEN SCIlVIE CAMBRIA LLP

/s/ Paul.I. Cambf^ia Jr.

PAUL J. CAMBRIA, JR.

Attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey

Sworn to before me this

28th day of June, 2018.

s/ April Kelly

Commissioner of Deeds

In and For the City of Buffalo, N.Y.

My Commission expires December 31, 2018

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 200-7 Filed 06/28/18 Page 2 of 2
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 15, 2012 | /s/ Francis R. Biscan, Jr.               |   |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Francis R. Biscan, Jr.,                  |   |
|                           | Director and Principal Executive Officer |   |

| Date:  June 15, 2012 | /s/ Lynda R. Keeton-Cardno, CPA            |   |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           | Lynda R. Keeton-Cardno, CPA                |   |
|                           | Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |   |

----
| (1)   | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Blue Earth Solutions, Inc. for the      quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Blue Earth Solutions,      Inc. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |   /s/ Patricia      Cohen                 |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Patricia      Cohen                           |
|  Title: |  Principal      Executive Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  November      14, 2008                        |

|  By:    |   /s/ Paul      Slusarczyk                |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Paul      Slusarczyk                          |
|  Title: |  Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  November      14, 2008                        |
#### Frank M. CONNELL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-6536.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 24, 2003.

Decided Aug. 20, 2003.

Frank M. Connell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Frank M. Connell, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would *275find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1040, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Connell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certifícate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32

                Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
               (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Adam Anthony, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer,
of Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated:  May 12, 2010

By:   /s/ Adam Anthony
      ----------------------------
      Adam Anthony
      Chief Executive Officer and
      Principal Accounting Officer


 * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by
Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Ying He,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


Dated:
                November 10, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Ying
              HeYing
                HeChief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[CIK]      0000914670
[NAME]     CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION

A.G. Contract                                     D.C. Contract
No:    KR97-0592                                  No: DC-PO-PRIV-96/97-6626-1

                             STATE OF ARIZONA
                         DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
                            1601 West Jefferson
                          Phoenix, Arizona 85007

                           AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

     The Agreement entered into between Correctional Services Corporation,
hereinafter referred to as CSC and the Director of the Arizona Department of
Corrections, hereinafter known as the Department, is hereby amended as
follows:

Purpose of Amendment:

     To add the following as Paragraph 3.12 to Article III:  The parties
agree that from time to time the total bed capacity of 400 at ASP-PW may be
exceeded on a temporary basis when the number of DUI inmates committed to the
Department exceeds the number of beds dedicated to DUI inmates within the
state prison system.

All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto agree to carry out the terms of this
Agreement.


CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION        ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

\s\  J.F. Slattery                       \s\  Terry L. Stewart   12/18/97
Signature of Authorized Individual       Signature of Authorized Individual
James F. Slattery                        Terry L. Stewart
Typed Name                               Typed Name
President, Chief Executive Officer       Director
Typed Title                              Typed Title
1819 Main Street, Suite 1000             1601 West Jefferson, M/C 445
Sarasota, Florida 34236                  Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Address                                  Address

                    Additional Signatures as Applicable

______________________________________   \s\ Charles L. Ryan     4/7/97
Signature              Date               Signature               Date
______________________________________    Charles L. Ryan
Typed Name                                Typed Name
______________________________________    Deputy Director, Prison Operations
Typed Title                               Typed Title

    Approved as to form this 26th day of March, 1997.

                                GRANT WOODS
                           The Attorney General

                      By:    \s\Graham A. Turner
                        Assistant Attorney General
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141235

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141235 COA: 297583 Kalamazoo CC: 2009-000848-FH KEVIN DEVON BRIGGS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 28, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS 

### , J., not participating. I recuse myse lf and am not participating because I was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3967 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3967

  To provide for a judicial remedy for disputes arising under certain 
                   agreements with foreign entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a judicial remedy for disputes arising under certain 
                   agreements with foreign entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REMEDY TO ENFORCE CERTAIN ARBITRATION CLAUSES.

    (a) Judicial Remedy.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
any person who has entered into any contract, license, or other 
agreement with any foreign entity before July 1, 1985, that contains a 
provision to settle by arbitration any controversy arising out of such 
contract, license, or other agreement, shall not be barred from 
bringing an action in any court of competent jurisdiction in the United 
States, including any Federal or State court, or from seeking 
appropriate relief from any agency of the United States, to resolve any 
controversy arising under such contract, license, or other agreement.
    (b) Person.--For purposes of this section, the term ``person'' 
means--
            (1) any natural person residing in the United States; and
            (2) any corporation, partnership, or other entity organized 
        under the laws of the United States.

SEC. 2. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.

    The right under section 1 to bring an action in a court or to seek 
appropriate relief from an agency of the United States applies only if 
the action is commenced, or petition for relief is filed, within the 2-
year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      12.1**

**Equity      One, Inc.**

**Ratio      of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

**For      the year ended December 31, 2006**

| Net                  income                              |   |   |    |   | $      | 176,955 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------|--------|--------|---------|--------|
|                                                     |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Adjustments:                                             |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Minority                  interest                       |   | $      | 206     |   |   |    |   |
| Income                  from discontinued operations     |   |   | (47,904 | )      |   |    |   |
| Distributed                  income of equity investees  |   |   | (1,650  | )      |   | (49,348 | )      |
|                                                     |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Fixed                  Charges:                          |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Interest                  expense                        |   |   | 64,632  |   |   |    |   |
| Capitalized                  interest                    |   |   | 5,820   |   |   |    |   |
| Amortization                  of premium                 |   |   | (3,289  | )      |   |    |   |
| Amortization                  of deferred financing fees |   |   | 1,503   |   |   | 68,666  |   |
| Add:                  Distributed income from investee   |   |   |    |   |   | 3,129   |   |
| Less:                  interest capitalized              |   |   | (5,820  | )      |   | (5,820  | )      |
|                                                     |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
|                                                     |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Earnings,                  as defined                    |   |   |    |   | $      | 193,582 |   |
|                                                     |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Divide                  by fixed charges                 |   |   |    |   | $      | 68,666  |   |
|                                                     |   |   |    |   |   |    |   |
| Ratio                  of earnings to fixed charges      |   |   |    |   |   | 2.82    |   |