alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-51029 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. EDUARDO L UNA-MORALES, also known as Eduardo R ico-Luna, a lso known as Eduardo Luna, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CR-1435-1

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Eduardo Luna-Morales appeals the 24-month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United S t a t e s a f ter d e portation. He contends that the sentence is greater than necessary to satisfy the senten c i n g factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a) , partly b ecause the Sentencing Guidelines for illegal reentry are not empirically based and partly because the district cou rt U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 19, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-51029 Document: 00512279790 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2013No. 12-51029

gave inadequate consideration to his personal c ircu m s t a n c es and m otive for reentry. The sentence i s reviewed for reasonableness under an abuse-of-discretion standard. See Gall v. United States , 5 52 U.S. 38, 46 ( 2007); R ita v. U nited States , 5 51 U.S. 338, 3 51 (2007). Be c a u s e t he guidelines range was p roperly calculated, Luna-Morales’s sentence at the bottom of that range is presumed reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo , 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Luna

- M o r a les essentially asks u s to substitute his a ssessment of the relevant sentencing f

actors for the district court’s well-rea s o n e d assessment, which is contrary to the deferential r eview dictated by Gal l a n d Rita

. LunaMorales concedes that his c hallenge to Guideline § 2L1.2 as lacking an empirical basis is foreclosed b y our precedent; he presents this issue only to preserve it for possible further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-51029 Document: 00512279790 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/19/2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN December 18, 2008

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

CIVIL 08-14922

FIALKA-FELDMAN V. OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

NOTICE REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE

The following motion(s) has been filed with the Court:

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

The Court reminds counsel and the parties of the provisions of Local Rule 7.1,

particularly 7.1(d) which provides:

(d) Briefing Schedule.

(1) Dispositive Motions.

 (A) Dispositive motions are:

for injunctive relief,

for judgment on the pleadings,

for summary judgment

to dismiss or quash an indictment or information

made by a defendant,

to suppress evidence in a criminal case,

to certify or decertify a class,

to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted, and

to involuntarily dismiss an action.

(B) A response to a dispositive motion must be filed within 21 days

after service of the motion.

(C) If filed, a reply brief supporting a dispositive motion must be

filed within 7 days after service of the response, but not less than 3 days before oral

argument.

(2) Nondispositive Motions:

(A) Nondispositive motions are motions not listed in

LR7.1(d)(1)(A).

(B) A response to a nondispositive motion must be filed within

14 days after service of the motion.

(C) If filed, a reply brief supporting a nondispositive motion must

be filed within 7 days after service of the nondispositive

response, but not less than3 days before oral argument.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3706 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3706

 To designate the Mollie Beattie Alaska Wilderness Area in the Arctic 
                       National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1996

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Mollie Beattie Alaska Wilderness Area in the Arctic 
                       National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mollie Beattie Alaska Wilderness 
Area Act''.

SEC. 2. MOLLIE BEATTIE ALASKA WILDERNESS AREA.

    Amend Public Law 96-487 by striking Section 702(3) and inserting in 
lieu thereof the following:
            ``(3) Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness of 
        approximately eight million acres as generally depicted on a 
        map entitled `Arctic National Wildlife Refuge' dated August 
        1980. That portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 
        Wilderness located in the Brooks Range on a map to be prepared 
        by the Secretary of the Interior shall be named and 
        appropriately identified as the `Mollie Beattie Alaska 
        Wilderness Area'.''

SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF MONUMENT.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall place a monument in honor of 
Mollie Beattie's contributions to fish, wildlife, and waterfowl 
conservation and management at the entrance to the Mollie Beattie 
Alaska Wilderness Area or another suitable location he designates.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 121

For the relief of Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian Arreola, 
            Nayely Bibiana Arreola, and Cindy Jael Arreola.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
For the relief of Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian Arreola, 
            Nayely Bibiana Arreola, and Cindy Jael Arreola.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any 
order, for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian 
Arreola, Nayely Bibiana Arreola, and Cindy Jael Arreola shall be deemed 
to have been lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, 
and shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255).
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the applications for issuance of immigrant visas or the 
applications for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 
not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas to Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian 
Arreola, Nayely Bibiana Arreola, and Cindy Jael Arreola, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 4, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Esidronio 
Arreola-Saucedo, Marina Elna Cobian Arreola, Nayely Bibiana Arreola, 
and Cindy Jael Arreola under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Esidronio Arreola-Saucedo, Maria Elna Cobian Arreola, Nayely 
Bibiana Arreola, and Cindy Jael Arreola under section 202(e) of such 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(c)).
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RM Health
      International, Inc. for the quarter ended August 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RM Health International, Inc. for
              the
              quarter ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
              of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended August 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of RM Health
              International, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Randy WestonName:
            Randy
                WestonTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            October
                15, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1669]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice of Public Hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Disposal and Reuse of Naval Base Philadelphia, 
Philadelphia, PA

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 
CFR parts 1500-1508) implementing procedural provisions of the National 
Environmental Policy Act, the Department of the Navy has prepared and 
filed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Disposal and Reuse of 
Naval Base Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. This action is being 
conducted in accordance with the Defense Base Closure and Realignment 
Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-510).
    The DEIS has been distributed to various federal, state, and local 
agencies, elected officials, special interest groups, the media, and 
the South Philadelphia Branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia; 1700 
South Broad Street, Philadelphia. A limited number of single copies are 
available at the address listed at the end of this notice for public 
review and comment. A public hearing to inform the public of the DEIS 
findings and to solicit comments will be held on February 15, 1996, 
beginning at 7:30 p.m., at the South Philadelphia Community Center, 
2600 South Broad Street (corner of Broad St. and Oregon Ave.), 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Please call the point of contact listed 
below or the Community Center at (610) 467-1500 in the case of 
inclement weather to confirm that the meeting will take place.
    Federal, state, local agencies and interested parties are invited 
and urged to be present or represented at the hearing. Oral statements 
will be heard and transcribed by a stenographer; however, to ensure 
accuracy of the record, all statements should be submitted in writing. 
All statements, both oral and written, will become part of the public 
record on this study. Equal weight will be given to both oral and 
written statements.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the DEIS should be mailed to the address 
noted below, and must be postmarked by March 4, 1996 to become part of 
the official record. Additional information concerning this notice may 
be obtained by contacting Ms. Tina Deininger, (Code 202), Northern 
Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 10 Industrial Highway, 
MSC 82, Lester, PA, 19113, telephone (610) 595-0759, facsimile (610) 
595-0778.

    Dated: January 25, 1996.
M.D. Schetzsle,
LT, JAGC, USNR, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-1669 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-M
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of F.E.M., a child, * From the County Court

at Law of Nolan County,

 Trial Court No. CC-6415.

No. 11-12-00257-CV * March 14, 2013

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the 

order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the order of the trial court is in 

all things affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Diane S. Button, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cactus Ventures, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 12, 2008  /s/ Diane S. Button Diane S. Button President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cactus Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Cactus Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                In connection with the Annual Report of SFN Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Roy G. Krause, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark W. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MMM STORE, INC. 

d/b/a COACH PARTY STORE, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No.: 09-10559 

 

Hon. Avern Cohn 

vs. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 

 

 Defendant. 

ORDER FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND SCHEDULING HEARING

Petitioner having filed its Petition for Judicial Review of Administrative Agency 

and the Court having scheduled a hearing for Wednesday, February 18, 2008 at 11:00 

a.m.;

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all Defendants, their respective officers, agents, 

servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation 

with them who receive actual notice of this Order and Petition by personal service or 

otherwise, are enjoined and restrained from disqualifying Petitioner from the SNAP 

program until the close of business on February 18, 2009. 

 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: February 13, 2009 s/Avern Cohn 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

2:09-cv-10559-AC-MKM Doc # 2 Filed 02/13/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 42
Exhibit I

Filed Under Seal

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1281-9 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 1
(LOGO)
                                  EQUIVANTAGE

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       FOR
                       EQUIVANTAGE HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST
                                     1997-2

The undersigned  Officer  certifies that for the fiscal year ending December 31,
1997, she has reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the
preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and
to the best of her  knowledge,  the  Servicer has  fulfilled  all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement throughout such year.

EQUIVANTAGE INC., Servicer 

Certified By:
/S/Elizabeth Folk
Elizabeth Folk, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

3/26/98
Date
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBL Healthcare Acquisition Corp. III (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I Marlene Krauss, M.D., Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                               |  |  |  |                       
|--- |  | ----------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Marlene Krauss, M.D.      |  |  |  | Dated: August 13, 2008
|    |  | Marlene Krauss, M.D.          |  |  |  |                       
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer       |  |  |  |                       
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer) |  |  |  |
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: James W. Cleveland v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 00668

- CR

Trial court case number: 1529355

Trial court: 180th District Court of Harris County

The clerk’s record was filed on August 8 , 201 8 , but the reporter’s record has not been filed.

On August 10 , 201 8 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the court reporter responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the Co urt that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the record and this Court’s records indicated that appellant is not appealing as indigent. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(b). The Clerk further notified appellant that unless he caused the reporter’s record to be filed in this Court, made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, or provided proof that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs by January 10, 2018 , the Court might consider the appeal without a reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c). Appellant failed to respond and has not provided the Court with evidence showing that he has paid or made arrangements to pay the court reporter or caused a reporter’s record to be filed in the Court.

Accordingly, the Court will consider and decide those issues or points that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See id . Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days

of the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Gordon Goo dman

______ Acting individually

Date: __ March 5, 2019

__
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL VANOOST, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:08-cv-14747-PJD-PJK 

JUDGE PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

JOINT STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Michael Vanoost and Defendant OfficeMax Incorporated, by and through their 

attorneys and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), hereby jointly stipulate to 

the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice. The parties have reached a voluntary and 

confidential settlement. This lawsuit should, therefore, be dismissed, with prejudice, with each 

party bearing its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ James Shaw (per e-mail consent) 

James Shaw (P49003) 

LAW OFFICE OF JAMES SHAW, P.C. 

14801 Plymouth Crossing 

Plymouth, MI 48170 

(248) 559-1223 

attorneyshaw1@yahoo.com

Joseph C. Bird (P33178) 

573 Nakomis Trail 

Lake Orion, MI 48362 

(248) 909-4235 

(248) 483-3908 (Fax) 

advocatejcb@aol.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff, 

MICHAEL VANOOST

/s/ Timothy S. Anderson 

Lee J. Hutton (0006794) 

Timothy S. Anderson (0071593) 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

1100 Superior Avenue, 20th Floor 

Cleveland, Ohio 44114 

(216) 696-7600 

(216) 696-2038 (Fax) 

lhutton@littler.com

tanderson@littler.com

Charles DeWitt, Jr. (P26636) 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 

200 Renaissance Center, Suite 3110 

Detroit, MI 48243-1301 

(313) 446-6400 

(313) 446-6405 (Fax) 

CDeWitt@littler.com

Attorneys for Defendant, 

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

2:08-cv-14747-PJD-PJK Doc # 20 Filed 05/28/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 65
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICHAEL VANOOST, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. 2:08-cv-14747-PJD-PJK 

JUDGE PATRICK J. DUGGAN 

AGREED ORDER GRANTING JOINT 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE

This cause, having come before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Dismissal 

with Prejudice is hereby dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and 

attorneys’ fees. 

ENTERED: 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: May 28, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on 

May 28, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

2:08-cv-14747-PJD-PJK Doc # 20 Filed 05/28/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 66