alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-102593, 333-104958, 333-107756 and 333-108889 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-43834, 333-70952, 333-96963, 333-107008, 333-121533, 333-127662, 333-134874, 333-145242 and 333-154744 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 5,2009, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Dot Hill Systems Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to theadoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*, effective January 1, 2007, and FASB StatementNo. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Payment,* effective January 1, 2006) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dot Hill Systems Corp.and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Diego, CA 

March 5, 2009
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-05873, 33-76120, 333-05959, 333-76122, 333-05957, 333-18935, 333-18883,
333-18885, 333-30841, 333-30211, 333-31901, 333-31895, 333-43757, 333-60365,
333-91995, 333-84751, 333-40914, 333-48116 and 333-60862 on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statement Nos. 33-94532, 333-09109, 333-50775, 333-50777 and
333-53351 on Forms S-3 of Spherion Corporation of our report dated February 5,
2003 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs
relating to the Company's change in method of accounting for derivative
instruments to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133
described in Note 1 and the change in method of accounting for goodwill and
other intangible assets to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142 described in Notes 1 and 5), appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Spherion Corporation for the year ended December 27, 2002.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 12, 2003
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Spherion Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Roy G. Krause, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mark W. Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|                                                    |   |                                                                                                     
|--------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1                                                  | ) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
|Act of 1934; and                                   
|                                                   
|(2                                                  | ) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial    
|condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ ROYG. KRAUSE                     
|Roy G. Krause                        
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 5, 2009                        

|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARKW. SMITH                            
|Mark W. Smith                               
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
|Officer                                     
|March 5, 2009                               



---
#### Stuart STOTTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Melissa MEYER, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 62347.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Richard A. Gartner, Becky R. Eggmann, Copeland, Gartner, Thompson *&*Farris, Clayton, for plaintiff-appellant.

Sharon E. Wilkes, Homire and Wilkes, P.C., St. Louis, for defendant-respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., SIMON, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals a jury verdict as well as the denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and motion for a new trial.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles YARBROUGH, Appellant. Charles YARBROUGH, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 66973, 70076.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Nov. 26, 1996.

*639A. Renae Adamson, Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, David G. Brown, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before AHRENS, C.J., and CRANDALL, J., and CHARLES B. BLACKMAR, Senior ' Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Charles Yarbrough, appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of first degree tampering, for which he was sentenced to eight years’ imprisonment. He also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

As to defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion: The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3867 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3867

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights 
             Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3867

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights 
             Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Developmental Disabilities 
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

    Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROTECTION AND 
              ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.

    Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.

SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO UNIVERSITY 
              AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

    Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and 
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is amended by striking ``the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 
through 1999''.

SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROJECTS OF NATIONAL 
              SIGNIFICANCE.

    Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and 
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is amended by striking ``the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 
through 1999''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Casey Container Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin R Nason,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Martin R Nason
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Martin R Nason
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              May 16, 2011

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0618 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. AUSTIN TYLER JOHNSON,

D efendant and Appellant.

**GRANT** Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until March 16, 2022, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 14 2022

02/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0618
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
The Board of Directors
Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corp.:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-48727) on Form S-8 of Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corp.
of our report dated February 4, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1998 and the period
from July 31, 1997 (Inception) through December 31, 1997, which report appears
in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Imperial Credit
Commercial Mortgage Investment Corp.
 
                                          KPMG LLP
 
Los Angeles, California
April 30, 1999
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 4675
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 2 of 12 Pg ID 4676
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 3 of 12 Pg ID 4677
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 4 of 12 Pg ID 4678
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 5 of 12 Pg ID 4679
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 6 of 12 Pg ID 4680
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 7 of 12 Pg ID 4681
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 8 of 12 Pg ID 4682
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 9 of 12 Pg ID 4683
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 10 of 12 Pg ID 4684
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 11 of 12 Pg ID 4685
2:08-cv-15326-PDB-MAR Doc # 91 Filed 08/10/12 Pg 12 of 12 Pg ID 4686
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3710 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3710

 To designate a United States courthouse located in Tampa, Florida, as 
            the ``Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 1996

Ms. Brown of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate a United States courthouse located in Tampa, Florida, as 
            the ``Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 611 North Florida Avenue in 
Tampa, Florida, shall be designated and known as the ``Sam M. Gibbons 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sam M. Gibbons 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
1 

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Ex.A Volume I of Trial Transcript 

Ex.B Volume II of Trial Transcript 

Jt.Ex1: Employment Agreement 

Jt.Ex.3 11/19/08 Letter to Shafi from Weidinger 

Jt.Ex.4: 11/24/08 email to Shafi from Milton 

Df.Ex.107: 8/15/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re Braintech email address 

Df.Ex.109: 8/19/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re insurance coverage 

Df.Ex.113: 8/20/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re software gathering 

Df.Ex.182: 9/12/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re draft employment letters 

Df.Ex.186: 9/12/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re deep dive into Reliabot 

Df.Ex.190: 9/16/08 Shafi to Manias email re John Neilson training, etc. 

Df.Ex.207: 9/23/08 Shafi to Weidinger email rejecting Manias 

Df.Ex.208: 9/24/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re employment agreement 

Df.Ex.221: 10/9/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re unauthorized use of credit card 

Df.Ex.238: 10/16/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re compensation figures 

Df.Ex.242: 10/17/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re refusal to travel 

Df.Ex.243: 10/19/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re response to revenue: damage 

Df.Ex.245: 10/20/08 Shafi to Weidinger email re writing employment offers 

Df.Ex.253: 10/20/08 Shafi to Weidinger email re passing on ESM meeting 

Df.Ex.254: 10/20/08 Weidinger/Shafi email exchange re ESM conference call 

Df.Ex.255: 10/20/08 Shafi/Weidinger email exchange re Shafi refusal to attend 

Df.Ex.272: 10/27/08 Shafi to Weidinger email re work plan week of Oct 27 

Df.Ex.278: 10/31/08 email regarding medical bill 

Df.Ex.279: 11/1/08 Dara to Shafi email re Reliabot product readiness 

Df.Ex.281: 11/2/08 Weidinger to sales team email re 11/7 sales plan meeting 

Df.Ex.285: 11/4/08 Dara to Shafi email re overflowing frustrations 

Df.Ex.286: 11/5/08 Burr to Shafi email re BCBS November premium paid 

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 161 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3450
2 

Df.Ex.288: 11/6/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re attendance at sales plan meeting 

Df.Ex.290: 11/9/08 Boca to Shafi email re request for Reliabot software 

Df.Ex.294: 11/10/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re attendance at meetings a priority 

Df.Ex.299: 11/10/08 Shafi/Boca email exchange re request for written points despite 

 Shafi disagreement with Reliabot evaluation 

 

Df.Ex.302: 11/12/08 Weidinger to Shafi email re Shafi absence from meetings 

Df.Ex.304: 11/13/08 Shafi to Weidinger email re medical insurance issues 

Df.Ex.315: 9/28/09 Shafi Response to Braintech Request to Admit Nos. 62 and 63 

Df.Ex.316: Reliabot comparison report 

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 161 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3451
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN,
Case Number 08-CV-14922
Plaintiff, Hon. Patrick J. Duggan

v.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD
OF TRUSTEES, et al.,

Defendants.

DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLMENTAL SUBMISSION TO PLAINTIFF’S
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Attached please find documents referenced during Defendants’ oral arguments regarding
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter, which are being provided as allowed by
the Court during said hearing:

Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Theresa M. Rowe (regarding G-Numbers).

Exhibit 2 - Affidavit of Mary Beth Snyder with records regarding Deniz Cikis,
and student at the University based on an F-1 Visa.

Exhibit 3 - Excerpts from regulations and publications of the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security regarding F-1 Visas.

Respectfully submitted,
BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin
Robert A. Boonin (P38172)

350 South Main Street, Suite 300
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
(734) 995-3110

boonin@butzel.com
Dated: December 18, 2009 Attorneys for Defendants

1



Certificate of Service
I, Robert A. Boonin, hereby certify that on December 18, 2009, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of the court using the ECF system, which will send
notification of such filing to all counsel of record.
BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin
Robert A. Boonin (P38172)

350 South Main Street, Suite 300
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
(734) 995-3110
boonin@butzel.com

Attorneys for Defendants
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF



THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Micheal Nugent, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-Q of Roadships Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Registrant"), for the three month period from January 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                | 
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: May 20, 2009 |  | /s/ Micheal Nugent             | 
|                   |  | Name:  Micheal Nugent         
|                   |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
exv10w04xay






Exhibit 10.04a




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE




CONTINUITY AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY (THE “COMPANY”)

AND (“EXECUTIVE”)




     WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company are parties to that certain Continuity Agreement, dated
as of July 1, 2001, as amended December 4, 2006 and October 28, 2008 (the “Continuity Agreement”);
and



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive wish to amend the terms of the Continuity Agreement
effective as of January 8, 2009, on the terms and conditions set forth herein;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties
hereby agree as follows:



     1. Section 8 of the Continuity Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at
the end thereof:




(d) In the event that the Company or an Employer fails to pay any amount to the
Executive at the time(s) required by this Agreement, the Company or such Employer,
as applicable, shall be required to pay the Executive such amount, plus interest at
the applicable federal rate provided for in Section 7872(f)(2)(A) of the Code on
such amount for the period during which payment of such amount is delayed.




     2. A new Section 19 is added to the Continuity Agreement:




19. Entire Agreement. From and after the Effective Date, this Agreement
shall supersede any other employment, severance or change of control agreement
between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, provided that nothing
herein shall limit any other rights that the Executive may have under any
compensation or benefits plan, program, policy, agreement or arrangement. In the
event that the Executive experiences a Termination, anything to the contrary in any
non-competition agreement or arrangement (or plan, policy, program, agreement or
arrangement containing a post-employment non-competition or similar covenant or
other restriction) by and between the Executive and the Company (or any of its
affiliates), the Executive shall not be subject to any post-employment
non-competition restrictions or similar restrictions.



 









 





          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date
first set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Rohm and Haas Company	 	 
	 


	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	January 8, 2009

	 	 	 	By:	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	January 8, 2009	 	 







2