alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3859

To amend section 1848 of the Social Security Act to extend for 1 year

the treatment of certain practice relative value units under the medicare

payment system for physicians’ services.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 1996

Mr. WHITFIELD (for himself and Mr. HALL of Texas) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend section 1848 of the Social Security Act to extend

for 1 year the treatment of certain practice relative value

units under the medicare payment system for physicians’

services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3859 IH

1 SECTION 1. 1-YEAR EXTENSION OF TREATMENT OF CER2 TAIN PRACTICE RELATIVE VALUE UNITS

3 UNDER THE MEDICARE RB-RVS PAYMENT

4 SYSTEM FOR PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES.

5 Paragraphs (2)(C)(ii) and (3)(C)(ii) of section

6 1848(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–

7 4(c)) are amended by striking ‘‘1998’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘1999’’ each place it appears.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              26                   5,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  40,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   (572)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                     740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,926                  48,907
<PP&E>                                               0                   9,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 (5,589)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,926                 200,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,181                  40,027
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            19                     120
<OTHER-SE>                                       (274)                 113,922
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,926                 200,642
<SALES>                                              0                  76,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                 168,833
<CGS>                                                0                  69,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                 114,512
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,715                  42,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                     314
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                   (593)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,715)                  12,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   6,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,715)                   5,533
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,175)                   5,533
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.62)                    0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)                    0.51
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-3026

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jason L. Clark

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: April 17, 2018

Filed: April 30, 2018 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jason Clark directly appeals the below-Guidelines sentence the district court

1

imposed after he pled guilty--pursuant to a plea agreement containing an appeal

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.
waiver--to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw,

and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

substantive reasonableness of Clark’s sentence, and arguing that the district court

should have departed further downward from the calculated Guidelines range.

We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See United States v. Scott,

627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (validity and applicability of appeal waiver is

reviewed de novo). The record shows that Clark entered into the plea agreement and

the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, the arguments on appeal fall within the

scope of the waiver, and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the

waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). 

Finally, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988), we find no non-frivolousissuesfor appeal outside the scope of the waiver. 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANGEL CARRERAS

- ARMSTRONG and KIM CARRERAS

- ARMSTRONG
, Appellant s ,

v.

CHERYL CINNANTE
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3971

[ December 7, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Thomas M. Lynch IV , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE15

- 003691 (05)

.

Brent F. Sibley of Sibley Law Firm, Aventura, for appellants.

Douglas H. Stein of Association Law Group, P.L., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**EXHIBIT 32.0**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF**

**CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

The undersignedexecutive officer of Trans World Corporation (the “Registrant”) hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge, the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date:  March 12,  2009 | /s/  Rami S. Ramadan                            |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Name: Rami S. Ramadan                           |
|                                  | Title:  President, Chief Executive Officer, and |
|                                  | Chief  Financial Officer                        |

 

This certification is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K andshall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, hasbeen provided to Trans World Corporation and will be retained by the Registrantand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 21



Subsidiary List:

Youth Services International, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Colorado, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Georgia, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Illinois, Inc, a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International Investments, LLC, a Maryland Limited
     Liability Corporation
Youth Services International of Iowa, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Minnesota, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Nevada, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International Holdings, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Puerto Rico, a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International Real Property Partnership, a Maryland
     Limited Liability Corporation
Youth Services International of Tennessee, Inc., a Maryland Corporation
Youth Services International of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Youth Services International Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Youth Services International of South Dakota, Inc., a
     South Dakota Corporation
Youth Services International of Texas, a Texas Corporation
Youth Services International of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Nos. 333-37347, 333-57500 and 333-104770) pertaining to the 1997 Stock IncentivePlan, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, International Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and EveryWare Replacement Option Plan of Pervasive Software Inc. of our report dated July 11, 2003 (except for Note 16, as to which the date is August 8, 2003) withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule of Pervasive Software Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

September 23, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 809 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 809

  Honoring the fact-finding reporting done by Hannah Giles and James 
   O'Keefe III in their investigation in the fraudulent and illegal 
    practices and misuse of taxpayer dollars by the Association of 
             Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2009

Mr. Olson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the fact-finding reporting done by Hannah Giles and James 
   O'Keefe III in their investigation in the fraudulent and illegal 
    practices and misuse of taxpayer dollars by the Association of 
             Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN).

Whereas Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe III filmed investigatory videos 
        uncovering the fraudulent and illegal practices of the Association of 
        Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN);
Whereas the House of Representatives voted to completely defund ACORN on 
        September 17, 2009;
Whereas these videos resulted in the potential annual savings of millions of 
        taxpayer dollars to organizations that contract with ACORN;
Whereas Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe III have displayed exemplary actions as 
        government watchdogs and young journalists uncovering wasteful 
        government spending; and
Whereas Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe III are owed a debt of gratitude by the 
        people of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe III for their 
        work as investigative journalists;
            (2) commends Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe III for 
        bringing to light the fraudulent behavior of the Association of 
        Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) and helping save 
        millions of taxpayer dollars that otherwise would have funded 
        ACORN; and
            (3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House to 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to Hannah Giles 
        and James O'Keefe III.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted this review on March 3, 2008 (73 FR 11440) and determined on June 6, 2008 that it would conduct an expedited review (73 FR 34325, June 17, 2008).

                    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on July 24, 2008. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4023 (July 2008), entitled                     *Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-990 (Review)*.                

Issued: July 24, 2008.

By order of the Commission.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in section 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E8-17664 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3868

AN ACT

To extend certain programs under the Energy Pol1996. icy and Conservation Act through September 30,
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3868

AN ACT

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and

Conservation Act through September 30, 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3868 EH

1 SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT

2 AMENDMENTS.

3 The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is

4 amended—

5 (1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246)

6 to read as follows:

7 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

8 ‘‘SEC. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated

9 for fiscal year 1996 such sums as may be necessary to

10 implement this part.’’;

11 (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking

12 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert13 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1996’’;

14 (3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42

15 U.S.C. 6276(h)) ‘‘There are authorized to be appro16 priated for fiscal year 1996 such sums as may be

17 necessary to carry out this part.’’; and

18 (4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking

19 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert20 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1996’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EARLAND COLLINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________ /

Case Number: 08-14881

JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A RECEIPT

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Court Calendar Review,” filed February 20,

2009. (Doc. No. 6). In his motion, Plaintiff requests a receipt for the filing fee Plaintiff paid to

file a civil action in this Court. Due to his inability to pre-pay the filing fee, Magistrate Judge

Steven Whalen waived the prepayment requirement and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in

installments. (Doc. No. 3). This Court subsequently summarily dismissed Plaintiff’s claim for

failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 4). Notwithstanding the

dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint, Plaintiff is still required to pay the filing fee in full and will

not receive a receipt until he has paid the filing fee in full. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee in

full and, therefore, is not entitled to a receipt. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for a receipt is

DENIED.

2:08-cv-14881-PDB-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 04/16/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 31
2

SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 16, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

April 16, 2009.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14881-PDB-MJH Doc # 7 Filed 04/16/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 32
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2820-2821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1547]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5409-2]


Acid Rain Program: Notice of Final Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).


[[Page 2821]]

ACTION: Notice of permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving 5-
year Phase I Acid Rain permits or permit modifications including sulfur 
dioxide (SO<INF>2) and/or nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X) compliance plans 
in accordance with the Acid Rain Program regulations (40 CFR parts 72 
and 76), for the following 21 utility plants: E C Gaston, Gadsden, 
Gorgas, and J.H. Miller in Alabama; Big Bend, Crist, Jack Watson, 
Lansing Smith, Scholz, and Victor J. Daniel in Florida; Arkwright, 
Harllee Branch, McIntosh, Mitchell, Port Wentworth, and Scherer in 
Georgia; Dunkirk and Roseton in New York; and Harrison, Rivesville, and 
Willow Island in West Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact the following persons for more 
information about a permit listed in this notice: for plants in 
Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, call Scott Davis, (404) 347-5014; for 
plants in New York, call Gerry DeGaetano, (212) 637-4020; and for 
plants in West Virginia, call Linda Miller, (215) 597-7547.

    Dated: January 23, 1996.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Acid Rain Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of 
Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 96-1547 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Search Warrant Google Gmail electronic mail account eriknownet@gmail.com Doc. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

COMMODITIES EXPORT COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 09-CV-11060-DT

CITY OF DETROIT, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER IMPOSING DEADLINES

On January 5, 2010, the court conducted a status conference in the abovecaptioned matter. During the conference, Plaintiff informed the court that it would soon

be seeking leave to file an amended complaint, incorporating specific allegations

against Detroit International Bridge Company (“DIBC”), who was recently added as a

Defendant. DIBC indicated that did not, at this point, know whether it would oppose the

amendment, but would have to make that determination after reviewing the draft

amended complaint. DIBC also stated that it may be filing a motion attacking this

court’s subject matter jurisdiction, but would have to first wait to see how the possible

amended pleading impacts the jurisdictional issues. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall prepare its draft amended complaint and

circulate it by January 12, 2010 to all Defendants, who shall, in turn, notify Plaintiff by

January 14, 2010 whether they will stipulate to the filing of the amended complaint. If

all Defendants agree to the filing of the amended complaint, Plaintiff shall file a

2:09-cv-11060-RHC-RSW Doc # 36 Filed 01/06/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 401
1Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, if all Defendants consent to the

amendment, the court need not issue a separate order granting leave to file the

amendment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) (allowing amendment with “the opposing party’s

written consent or the court’s leave”). 

2

stipulation and an amended complaint by January 19, 2010.

1

 Thereafter, by January

25, 2010, Defendants shall file either their respective answers, or any motion

challenging the court’s jurisdiction.

Alternatively, if Defendants do not agree to the filing of an amended complaint,

Plaintiff shall file its motion to amend by January 19, 2010. Responses will be due by

February 2, 2010, and any reply by February 9, 2010. 

Finally, if the parties agree to the amendment of the complaint, and also do not

challenge the court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the court will conduct a status

conference on January 28, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 6, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, January 6, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\09-11060.COMMODITIES.ImposeDeadlines.AmendCompl.wpd

2:09-cv-11060-RHC-RSW Doc # 36 Filed 01/06/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 402