SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ___________________________________  FORM 10-Q  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For Quarter Ended: June 30, 2009  Commission File Number: 0-52534 ___________________________________  ENDEAVOR POWER CORP. (Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)  Nevada72-1619357(State or Other JurisdictionIRS Employerof Incorporation or Organization)Identification Number  501 W. Broadway Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 (Address of principal executive offices)  (866) 982-0999 (Registrants Telephone Number)  3939 Royal Drive, Suite 226 Kennesaw, GA 30144 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)  with a copy to: Carrillo Huettel, LLP 501 W. Broadway, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone (619) 399-3090 Telecopier (619) 330-1888  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X. No .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes . No .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large Accelerated Filer.Accelerated Filer.Non-Accelerated Filer.Smaller Reporting CompanyX.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes . No X.  Issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year: Nil  As of July 27, 2009, there were 65,344,865 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding.   ENDEAVOR POWER CORP. Report on Form 10-Q   PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1.Financial Statement3Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations13Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk17Item 4.Controls and Procedures17PART II  OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.Legal Proceedings18Item 1A.Risk Factors18Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds18Item 3.Default Upon Senior Securities18Item 4.Submission of matters to a Vote of Security Holders18Item 5.Other Information18Item 6.Exhibits19  2   PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION  Endeavor Power Corp. (formerly Endeavor Uranium, Inc.) (An Exploration Stage Company)  June 30, 2009  IndexBalance Sheets4Statements of Operations5Statements of Cash Flows6Notes to the Financial Statements7  3   Endeavor Power Corp. (formerly Endeavor Uranium, Inc.) (An Exploration Stage Company) Balance Sheets (expressed in U.S. dollars)  June 30,
2009
$
(unaudited)December 31,
2008
$ASSETSCurrent AssetsCash347Total Current Assets347Investment in Joint Venture (Note 3)334,86825,000Total Assets334,86825,347LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICITCurrent LiabilitiesAccounts Payable17,0141,848Accrued Liabilities107,15040,150Due to a Related Party (Note 4)507,962179,689Total Liabilities632,126221,687Stockholders DeficitPreferred Stock
Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares, with a par value of $0.001 per share
Issued and outstanding: nil preferred sharesCommon Stock
Authorized: 250,000,000 common shares, with a par value of $0.0001 per share
Issued and outstanding: 65,344,865 common shares6,5356,535Additional Paid-In Capital5,978,5645,978,564Accumulated Deficit During the Exploration Stage(6,282,357)(6,181,439)Total Stockholders Deficit(297,258)(196,340)Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit334,86825,347  Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business (Note 1)  (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)   4   Endeavor Power Corp. (formerly Endeavor Uranium, Inc.) (An Exploration Stage Company) Statements of Operations (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
2009For the Three
Months Ended
June 30,
2008For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2009For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2008Accumulated from
July 6, 2005 (Date
of Inception) to
June 30,
2009$$$$$RevenueExpensesGeneral and Administrative12,89410,17917,74323,811113,286Impairment of Mining Properties5,600,000Management Fees25,00037,00037,000Mineral Exploration Costs337,754337,754377,377Professional Fees18,92518,56746,17518,567156,517Total Expenses56,819366,500100,918423,7556,284,180Other IncomeInterest Income1,823Net Loss for the Period(56,819)(366,500)(100,918)(423,755)(6,282,357)Loss Per Share  Basic and Diluted
Net Loss Per Share  Basic and DilutedWeighted Average Shares Outstanding65,344,86565,344,86565,344,86565,344,865  (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)  5   Endeavor Power Corp. (formerly Endeavor Uranium, Inc.) (An Exploration Stage Company) Statements of Cash Flows (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2009For the Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2008Accumulated from
July 6, 2005 (Date
of Inception) to
June 30,
2009$$$Operating ActivitiesNet loss for the period(100,918)(423,755)(6,282,357)Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Impairment of Mineral Properties5,600,000Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities82,166265,389124,164Due to related parties9,588Net Cash Used In Operating Activities(18,752)(158,366)(548,605)Investing ActivityInvestment in Joint Venture(309,868)(334,868)Net Cash Used in Investing Activity(309,868)(334,868)Financing ActivitiesProceeds from loan payable161,798211,260Proceeds from note payable from related party328,273593,222Proceeds from issuance of common shares83,991Repayment on cancellation of common shares(5,000)Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities328,273161,798883,473Increase (Decrease) in Cash(347)3,432Cash  Beginning of Period34784Cash  End of Period3,516Supplemental DisclosuresInterest paidIncome tax paidNon-cash Investing and Financing ActivitiesCommon shares issued to acquire mineral properties5,600,000  (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)  6   Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  1. Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business  Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 6, 2005 under the name VB Biotech Laboratories, Inc. (VB Labs). On September 21, 2007, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada to change its operating name to VB Trade, Inc. (VB Trade), with principal business operations to develop an online website that allowed web designers to sell their website designs in exchange for a commission on all products that were sold through the website. On September 21, 2007, the Company entered into a Plan of Merger (the Merger) with Endeavor Uranium, Inc., a mineral exploration company with mineral properties in the northwestern United States. Effectively, the Company changed its name to Endeavor Uranium, Inc. as part of the Merger transaction. The Company is an Exploration Stage Company, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No.7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.  These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has generated no revenues to date and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to pay dividends or generate significant earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. As at June 30, 2009, the Company had a working capital deficit of $632,126 and an accumulated deficit of $6,282,357. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability to raise equity or debt financing, and the attainment of profitable operations from the Company's future business. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  a) Basis of Presentation  These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Companys fiscal year-end is December 31.  b) Interim Financial Statements  These interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Form 10-Q. They do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10- filed on April 7, 2008 with the SEC.  The financial statements included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all normal recurring accruals and adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position at June 30, 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future quarters or the full year.  c) Use of Estimates  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the valuation of its mineral properties, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Companys estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.  7   Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)  d) Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share  The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share". SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.  e) Comprehensive Loss  SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company has no items that represent comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.  f) Financial Instruments  SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. SFAS No. 157 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:  Level 1  Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2  Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.  Level 3  Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.  The Companys financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to SFAS No. 157, the fair value of our cash is determined based on Level 1 inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.  8   Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)  g) Foreign Currency Translation  The Companys functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with SFAS No. 52 Foreign Currency Translation using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. The Company has not, to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.  h) Cash and Cash Equivalents  The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at June 30, 2009, the Company had no cash equivalents.  i) Income Taxes  Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 109 Accounting for Income Taxes as of its inception. Pursuant to SFAS No. 109 the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.  j) Revenue Recognition  The Company will recognize revenue from referral fees in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is provided, and collectibility is assured. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not record any revenues.  k) Recent Accounting Pronouncements  In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4).



FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on estimating fair value when market activity has decreased and on identifying transactions that are not orderly.



Additionally, entities are required to disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value.



This FSP is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.

 The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, (FSP FAS 157-3), which clarifies application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active.



FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued.

 The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1).



FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional fair value disclosures about employers pension and postretirement benefit plan assets consistent with guidance contained in SFAS 157.



Specifically, employers will be required to disclose information about how investment allocation decisions are made, the fair value of each major category of plan assets and information about the inputs and valuation techniques used to develop the fair value measurements of plan assets. This FSP is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009.

 The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  9   Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)  k) Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)  In September 2008, the FASB issued exposure drafts that eliminate qualifying special purpose entities from the guidance of SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial



Assets and



Extinguishments of Liabilities, and



FASB



Interpretation 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of



Variable



Interest Entities − an interpretation of ARB



No. 51,” as well as other modifications.



While the proposed revised pronouncements have not been finalized and the proposals are subject to further public comment, the

adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. It is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  l) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements  In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.



This disclosure-only FSP improves the transparency of transfers of financial assets and an enterprises involvement with variable interest entities, including qualifying special-purpose entities.



This FSP is effective for the first reporting period (interim or annual) ending after December 15, 2008, with earlier application encouraged.



The adoption of

this statement

 had no impact on the Companys

financial statements

..  In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting, and therefore need to be included in the computation of earnings per share under the two-class method as described in FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings per Share. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts  An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60. SFAS 163 requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. It also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities, and requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, except for some disclosures about the insurance enterprises risk-management activities. SFAS 163 requires that disclosures about the risk-management activities of the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period beginning after issuance. Except for those disclosures, earlier application is not permitted. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  10   Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)  l) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (continued)  In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities  an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No.51SFAS No. 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non controlling interest. SFAS No. 160 also requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SAFAS No. 160 also requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parents owners and the interests of the non-controlling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  m) Comparative Figures  Certain comparative figures have been reclassified in order to conform to the current years financial statement presentation.  3. Investment in Joint Venture  On December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the Federated Agreement) with Federated Energy Corporation (Federated), a Tennessee company, for working interest in oil and gas prospects and oil and gas wells (the Assets) located in Nowata County, Oklahoma.  Under the terms of the Federated Agreement, the Companys principal objective in the joint venture is to secure necessary financing for drilling and exploration costs whereas Federateds principal objective is to operate and manage the Assets. The Assets are subject to an 18.75% overriding royalty.  On June 15, 2009, the Company filed a second amendment to the joint venture agreement. Prior to signing the second amendment, the Company had paid $285,000 and still owed $240,000 on the Agreement. Per the terms of the second amendment, Endeavor has acquired a 29.85% working interest in the JV Wells (as that term is defined in the Original Agreement) in exchange for payments made prior to June 15, 2009. The Second Amendment revises the payment schedule of the remaining $240,000 outstanding balance from the Original Agreement and First Amendment, of which $25,000 was paid on June 15, 2009.  11   Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (expressed in U.S. dollars) (unaudited)  3. Investment in Joint Venture (continued)  In exchange for each installment payment made per the terms of the Second Amendment, Endeavor shall receive an additional 2.35% working interest. The second amendment revised the remaining payments subject to the following terms:  July 6, 2009$25,000July 16, 2009$25,000July 27, 2009$25,000August 6, 2009$25,000August 17, 2009$25,000August 27, 2009$25,000September 7, 2009$25,000September 17, 2009$15,000  As of June 30, 2009, the Company has paid $334,868 to Federated for the Agreement. Refer to Note 5(b).  4. Related Party Transactions  a) As at June 30, 2009, the Company owes $9,588 (2007 - $9,588) to a former director of the Company for financing of day-to-day activities. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.  b) As at June 30, 2009, the Company owes $498,374 (December 31, 2008 - $170,101) from a shareholder of the Company. The amount owing is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.  5. Subsequent Events  a) On July 21, 2009, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with TXO, PLC (TXO Agreement). Under the terms of the TXO Agreement, the Company acquired a 75% working interest in oil and gas properties located in the Randle Fair Lease in Gregg County, Texas in exchange for $600,000.  b) On July 20, 2009, the Company suspended further payments to the Federated Agreement pending further geological testing regarding the financial viability of the claims.  12   ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  CAUTIONARY FORWARD - LOOKING STATEMENT  Statements included in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in future filings by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Company's press releases and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer which are not historical or current facts are "forward-looking statements" made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected and in the future could affect the Company's actual results and could cause the Company's actual financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in any forward-looking statement: (i) the extremely competitive conditions that currently exist in the three dimensional software development marketplace are expected to continue, placing further pressure on pricing which could adversely impact sales and erode profit margins; (ii) many of the Company's major competitors in its channels of distribution have significantly greater financial resources than the Company; and (iii) the inability to carry out marketing and sales plans would have a materially adverse impact on the Company's projections. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive and the Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.  Introduction  We were incorporated as a Nevada company on July 6, 2005 under the name VB Biotech Laboratories, Inc. On June 20, 2006, we changed our name to VB Trade, Inc. On September 21, 2007, we changed our name to Endeavor Uranium, Inc. Finally, on December 19, 2008 we changed our name to Endeavor Power Corp. Our registration statement on Form SB-2 became effective as of March 14, 2007. Our common stock became eligible for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on May 3, 2007 under the ticker symbol VBTR.OB. On October 5, 2007, as a result of our name change, our symbol changed to EDVU.OB. On January 23, 2009, as a result of our name change, our symbol changed to EDVP.OB.  On September 5, 2008, the Board of Directors determined that due to our inability to procure viable mining properties in our target areas and our further inability to raise the capital required to continue pursuing leased claims, and based on the financial condition of the Company, the Company ceased all operation. The Companys Board of Directors decided that the Company would likely be considered a shell company. Accordingly, during the majority of the Fourth Quarter of 2008, the Company was not operating and was solely in the business of identifying and pursuing acquisition, partnership or suitable venture candidates.  December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (Joint Venture Agreement) with Federated Energy Corporation (Federated). Under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement, the Company agreed to provide incremental funding to Federated to be used to fund operations and in return the Company would receive a 51% working interest in certain leaseholds in Nowata County, Oklahoma (the JV Wells) owned by Federated. In addition to the foregoing, the Company received a right of first refusal to purchase an additional 51% in all future wells developed by Federated, which Federated presently owns in exchange for $45,000 per well to be tendered by the Company to Federated.  On June 15, 2009, Endeavor Power Corp. (the Company) entered into a Second Amendment (Second Amendment) to the Joint Venture Agreement with Federated. On February 14, 2009, Endeavor and Federated executed a First Amendment to Joint Venture Agreement (the First Amendment) memorializing various minor, non-material, changes to the terms of the Original Agreement. The parties have now entered into a Second Amendment in order to further amend certain terms and conditions of the Original Agreement and the First Amendment. As of the date hereof, Endeavor has acquired a 29.85% working interest in the JV Wells in exchange for payments made. Additionally, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Second Amendment, Endeavor shall be entitled to immediately begin to receive its earned and pro-rata share of a maximum of 41.4375% of the revenue already generated and which will continue to be derived from the JV Wells.  As of June 17, 2009, Endeavor paid a total of $310,000 towards the Joint Venture and still owes $215,000 to Federated. The Second Amendment revises the payment schedule of the remaining $240,000 outstanding balance from the Original Agreement and First Amendment, of which $25,000 was paid on June 15, 2009. The remaining payments that are due per the Second Amendment shall be used to frac the JV Wells. In exchange for each installment payment made per the terms of the Second Amendment, Endeavor shall receive an additional 2.35% working interest.  13   Background  As VB Trade, Inc., we were engaged in the development of a website that would allow freelance web designers to sell their website designs on our website. Our goal was to generate revenues by charging a commission of 30% on all products sold through our website. We intended on becoming a one-stop shopping venue through which customers and freelance web designers can meet in a mutually beneficial fashion.  On September 21, 2007, Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (the Subsidiary), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant, merged with and into the Registrant pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated September 20, 2007 by and between the Registrant and Subsidiary (the Merger). As of September 21, 2007, the effective date of the merger, (i) the Registrant was the surviving corporation and the separate existence of Endeavor ceased in accordance with the provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes; (ii) the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant continued to be those of the surviving corporation; and (iii) the Registrant changed its name to Endeavor Uranium, Inc.  Following the Merger, on November 26, 2007, the Company acquired the leasehold interests to 12 unpatented mining claims located in Montrose County, Colorado, which consist of 240 acres about 10 miles from Naturita, Colorado and is known as the Baboon Basin property. It is yet to be determined whether this property contains reserves that are economically recoverable. The recoverability of property expenditures will be dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of the Companys interest in the underlying property, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to satisfy the expenditure requirements under the property agreement and upon future profitable production or proceeds for the sale thereof.  On September 5, 2008, the Board of Directors determined that due to our inability to procure viable mining properties in our target areas and our further inability to raise the capital required to continue pursuing leased claims, and based on the financial condition of the Company, the Company ceased all active exploration in the Baboon Basin and as a result had no right, title or interest to any mining claims whatsoever. Accordingly, the Companys Board of Directors decided that the Company would likely be considered a shell company. At that time we planned to undertake further discussions with the owners of potential mining properties in North America. Accordingly, the Board considered and pursued all viable acquisition candidates in the mining industry as well as any other potential acquisition candidates from other, non-mining related industries.  Finally, on December 23, 2008, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (Joint Venture Agreement) with Federated Energy Corporation (Federated). Under the terms of the Joint Venture, the Company agreed to provide incremental funding to Federated for operations in return for a 51% of the interest owned by Federated in certain leaseholds in Nowata County, Oklahoma (the JV Wells), in exchange for $525,000 in cash to be provided in incremental payments. In addition to the foregoing, the Company received a right of first refusal to purchase an additional 51% in all future wells developed by Federated, which Federated presently owns, in exchange for $45,000 per well to be tendered by the Company to Federated.  As an independent oil and gas company engaged in the acquisition, development, production and exploration of oil and gas properties located primarily in North America. Our primary objective is to increase shareholder value. To accomplish this objective, our business strategy is focused on the following:  Further Exploitation of Existing Properties.We seek to add proved reserves and increase production through the use of advanced technologies, including detailed reservoir engineering analysis, drilling development wells utilizing sophisticated techniques and selectively recompleting existing wells. We also focus on reducing the operating costs associated with our properties. We believe that the properties we have acquired have significant potential and in certain cases have not been actively developed in the past.  Property Portfolio Management.We will evaluate our property base to identify opportunities to divest non-core, higher cost or less productive properties with limited development potential. This strategy allows us to focus on a portfolio of core properties with significant potential to increase our proved reserves and production.  Pursuit of Strategic Transactions.We continue review opportunities to acquire producing properties, leasehold acreage and drilling prospects. We seek negotiated transactions to acquire operational control of properties that we believe have significant exploitation and exploration potential. Our strategy includes a significant focus on increasing our holdings in fields and basins in which we already own an interest.  Maintenance of Financial Flexibility.We believe the Company should be structured and financed so that internally generated cash flows cover all operating expenses, general and administrative expense and interest expense, that drawn borrowing capacity should be used for lower risk development expenditures and that the capital markets should be used to fund acquisitions of producing properties and leasehold acreage, and to fund higher risk development and exploration activities.  14   Strategic alignment. We have secured through the alignment with our strategic partnerships a unique ability to analyze and operate both our existing properties and future potential acquisitions. When our domestic production has reached a critical mass, we plan to re-evaluate the suitability of adding an exploratory and/or International component to our strategy.  Risk management.The Company has used commodity price derivatives in the past to reduce our exposure to price fluctuations and reserves the right to do so in the future, if management believes that such derivatives will improve the balance between risk and rewards.  Current Activities/Plan of Operation  The Company will still continue with its operations in Nowata County in the North Eastern part of Oklahoma, as the Companys current wells are located there and are surrounded by production that has been in existence since the early 1900s. The Company and Federated have completed development of the Patrick Henry Lease which is located in the Nowata, County. Federated has re-worked thirteen (13) wells and has established one (1) saltwater injection well on the Patrick Henry Lease.  Additionally, on July 21, 2009, we entered into a Farmout Agreement (Farmout Agreement) with Togs Energy, Inc. (Togs), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TXO, PLC (TXO), and M-C Production and Drilling Co, Inc. (MCPD). Under the terms of the Farmout Agreement, the Company has agreed to test/rework, and subsequently lease, six (6) wells located in the Randle Christian (Fair) lease in exchange for an aggregate of six hundred thousand ($600,000) dollars (the Lease Cost), for which the Company shall receive an assignment of a seventy-five percent (75%) working interest of an eighty percent (80%) net revenue lease held by Togs or its affiliate. The Lease Cost shall cover the costs to test and re-complete 6 wells to a depth of 3,400 or to such depth necessary to test and operate on the Woodbine Formation.  The Farmout Agreement provides that additional wells on the Lease may be drilled/deepened and/or that the parties may expand the joint venture to include other leases, further contributing to Endeavors long term goals. The project is described as a well deepening and re-work project, to a depth of 3,800 with the objective of reaching lower stringers of the Woodbine Formation in the East Texas Field, which covers over 140,000 acres and has historically proven to produce oil consistently. The East Texas Field, originally discovered in 1930, encompasses 5 counties in East Texas, is 45 miles long and 18 miles wide. Importantly, the Field has many additional targets, with up to 11,000 existing wells of those 8,000 are currently producing and 3,000 are ready for re-development, of which TXO owns 348 wells.  We will continue identify and pursue potential opportunities throughout the United States during the remainder of 2009.  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 COMPARED TO THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008.  Operating Revenues  We have not generated any revenues since inception.  Operating Expenses and Net Loss  Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $56,819 compared with $366,500 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease of $309,681 was attributed to expenditures incurred on mineral property claims of $337,754 in fiscal 2008 that were no longer incurred in fiscal 2009 as the Company forfeited its rights to the property in September 2008. The decrease was offset by a $25,000 increase in management fees which comprise of monthly amounts paid to management for their time and service to the Company.  Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $100,918 compared with $423,755 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease of $322,837 was attributed to expenditures incurred on mineral property claims of $337,754 in fiscal 2008 that were no longer incurred in fiscal 2009 as the Company forfeited its rights to the property in September 2008, and a decrease of $6,068 in general and administrative costs. The decrease was offset by a $37,000 increase in management fees which comprise of monthly amounts paid to management for their time and service to the Company, and an increase of $27,608 in professional fees related to legal and accounting costs incurred for the Companys SEC filings as well as due diligence and drafting of agreements for the Companys joint venture acquisition.   15   Liquidity and Capital Resources  As at June 30, 2009, the Companys cash balance was $nil compared to $347 as at December 31, 2008 and its total assets were $334,868 compared with $25,347 as at December 31, 2008. The increase in total assets is attributed to acquisition costs of $334,868 related to the joint venture agreement signed by the Company in December 2008. As at June 30, 2009, the Company had total liabilities of $632,126 compared with total liabilities of $221,687 as at December 31, 2008. The increase in total liabilities was attributed to increases of $82,166 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities related primarily to accrued management fees of $37,000 and accrued legal expenses of $30,000, and an increase of $328,273 in amounts due to a related party which was primarily related to payments on the investment in the joint venture. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not issue any common shares, share purchase warrants, or stock options.  As at June 30, 2009, the Company had a working capital deficit of $632,126 compared with a working capital deficit of $221,340 as at December 31, 2008. The increase in the working capital deficit of $410,786 was attributed to increases in demand loans of $328,273 that was used to finance the Companys investment in the joint venture and for legal, accounting, and general and administrative expenses incurred during the three months ended June 30, 2009 that were unpaid given the lack of sufficient cash flow in the Company. The remaining increase was related to $67,000 for accrued management and legal fees that were incurred during the fiscal year.  Cashflow from Operating Activities  During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company used $18,752 of cash for operating activities compared to the use of $158,366 of cash for operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in cashflows used for operating activities is attributed to the fact that the Company used financing from a related party to acquire its interest in the joint venture which was capitalized compared with fiscal 2008 where the Company incurred operating costs on its mineral properties which were expensed as incurred.  Cashflow from Financing Activities  During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company received $328,273 of cash from financing activities compared to $161,798 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in cashflows provided from financing activities is based on the fact that the Company was required to make minimum payments as part of the joint venture compared to prior year where the Company was not subject to such obligations and financing raised from a related party was used to pay off outstanding amounts owing to creditors.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements  The Company has no material transactions, arrangements, obligations (including contingent obligations), or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future impact on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources, or significant components of revenues or expenses.  Critical Accounting Policies  We have identified the following critical accounting policies which were used in the preparation of our financial statements.  Long-lived Assets: The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of property, plant and equipment costs, to determine if these costs are in excess of their net realizable value and if a permanent impairment needs to be recorded. The periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property, plant and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.  Property Retirement Obligation: SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, requires the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation to be recognized in the period that it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. Accretion expense is recorded in each subsequent period to recognize the changes in the liability resulting from the passage of time. Changes resulting from revisions to the original fair value of the liability are recognized as an increase or decrease in the carrying amount of the liability and the related asset retirement costs capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset.  16   Stock- Based Compensation: SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, requires the recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the financial statements and is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award. SFAS 123(R) also requires the stock option compensation expense to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period). We utilize the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine fair value.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements  In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. It is effective 60 days following the SECs approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial statements.  ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.  ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures  We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer (whom we refer to in this periodic report as our Certifying Officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Certifying Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, our Certifying Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective and contained the following significant deficiencies and material weaknesses of our internal controls over financial reporting:  1. We do not have an Audit Committee While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the managements view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over the Companys financial statement. Currently the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee, consisting of one sole member who is not independent of management and one member who is independent of management, but lacks sufficient financial expertise for overseeing financial reporting responsibilities.  2. We did not maintain appropriate cash controls As of June 30, 2009, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to perform monthly bank reconciliations and the fact that the Company operated through most of the period with a single director and officer and did not require dual signature on the Companys bank accounts. Alternatively, the effects of poor cash controls were mitigated by the fact that the Company had limited transactions in their bank accounts and that the Companys quarterly and year-end financial statements and audit working papers and supporting documents were prepared and reviewed by an independent accounting firm prior to submission to our external auditors, which mitigated the risk of misappropriation of cash.  Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Companys Internal Control over Financial Reporting  Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our Board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:  1. Our Board of Directors will nominate an audit committee and audit committee financial expert.  2. We will appoint additional personnel to assist with the preparation of the Companys monthly financial reporting, including preparation of the monthly bank reconciliations.  17   3. We now have one sole member of management and one independent member of the Board of Directors. We will implement necessary procedures and policies to ensure that any transactions requiring payment from the Companys bank accounts will be reviewed and approved by more than one individual.  Changes in Internal Controls  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  PART II - OTHER INFORMATION.  ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.  We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. No federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against the Company. No director, executive officer or affiliate of the Company or owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of the Company's common stock is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company in any proceeding.  Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.  We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.  ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.  None  ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.  None  ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.  None  ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.  On July 21, 2009, we entered into a definitive Farmout Agreement (Farmout Agreement) with Togs Energy, Inc. (Togs), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TXO, PLC (TXO), and M-C Production and Drilling Co, Inc. (MCPD). Under the terms of the Farmout Agreement, the Company has agreed to test/rework, and subsequently lease, six (6) wells located in the Randle Christian (Fair) lease in exchange for an aggregate of six hundred thousand ($600,000) dollars (the Lease Cost), for which the Company shall receive an assignment of a seventy-five percent (75%) working interest of an eighty percent (80%) net revenue lease held by Togs or its affiliate. The Lease Cost shall cover the costs to test and re-complete 6 wells to a depth of 3,400 or to such depth necessary to test and operate on the Woodbine Formation. Each well has a per well cost of one hundred ($100,000) dollars.  The Farmout Agreement provides that additional wells on the Lease may be drilled/deepened and/or that the parties may expand the joint venture to include other leases, further contributing to Endeavors long term goals. The project is described as a well deepening and re-work project, to a depth of 3,800 with the objective of reaching lower stringers of the Woodbine Formation in the East Texas Field, which covers over 140,000 acres and has historically proven to produce oil consistently. The East Texas Field, originally discovered in 1930, encompasses 5 counties in East Texas, is 45 miles long and 18 miles wide. Importantly, the Field has many additional targets, with up to 11,000 existing wells of those 8,000 are currently producing and 3,000 are ready for re-development, of which TXO owns 348 wells.  The Farmout Agreement contemplates that MCPD shall act as the operator of the leases and such operations shall be governed by the A.A.P.L. Form 610-1982 Model Form Operating Agreement, established by the American Association of Petroleum Landmen.  18   ITEM 6. EXHIBITS  The following exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:  ExhibitNumberDescription of Exhibit3.01Articles of Incorporation(1)3.01Restated Articles of Incorporation(1)3.03Bylaws(1)10.01Joint Venture Agreement(2)10.02Second Amendment to the Joint Venture Agreement(3)10.03Farmout Agreement(4)31.01Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(5)31.02Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(5)32.01CEO and CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(5) _____________ (1)Incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on November 13, 2008.(2)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 13, 2008.(3)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009.(4)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 21, 2009.(5)Filed herewith.  *All exhibits are numbered with the number preceding the decimal indicating the applicable SEC reference number in Item 601 and the number following the decimal indicating the sequence of the particular document.   19   SIGNATURES  In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the Undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  ENDEAVOR POWER CORP.       Dated: August 17, 2009 /s/ Brandon Toth By: Brandon Toth Its: President and CEO    20