alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ron Kalfus, Chief Financial Officer of MabCure Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (a) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      three month period ended March 31, 2010, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

|By:    | /s/ Ron Kalfus                                     | 
|------ | -------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Ron Kalfus                                         | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer                            | 
|       | (Principal Financial and
      Accounting Officer) | 
|Date:  | May 14, 2010                                       | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40401 Conference Calendar

ROBERT L. WILLIAMS, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus BRADSHAW STATE JAIL, Facility Health Administrator, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CV-43

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Robert L. Williams, III, a Texas prisoner (# 680652), appeals from the dismissal of his pro se , in forma pauperis (“IFP”) civil rights action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court dismissed the complaint, which was filed on January 26, 2001, and which concerned injuries allegedly inflicted by the defendant on January 21, 1999, because it was barred by the applicable two-year Texas statute of limitations. A district court may sua sponte dismiss a complaint as frivolousNo. 01-40401 -2- on statute-of-limitations grounds where “it is clear from the face of a complaint that the claims asserted are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.” Moore v. McDonald , 30 F.3d 616, 620 (5th Cir. 1994). For § 1983 claims, federal courts apply the general personal injury statute of limitations of the forum state, Owens v. Okure , 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989), which is two years in Texas. See Piotrowski v. City of Houston , 237 F.3d 567, 576 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 53 (2001) ; T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 16.003(a) (West 1999). The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Williams’ complaint was not filed within the applicable two-year limitations period. Because Williams’ appeal is without arguable merit, the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; see Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The dismissal of the instant appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint as frivolous each count as a “strike” under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Williams is cautioned that, once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Brian C. Harriss, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of North Atlantic
Trading Company, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

<PAGE>
         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.




Date: August 19, 2005


/s/ Brian C. Harriss
--------------------------------------
Name: Brian C. Harriss
Title: Chief Financial Officer























                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16326]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Cargo Tank Safety Roundtable Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is announcing a Cargo Tank Roundtable meeting to 
discuss safety issues relative to the highway transportation of 
hazardous materials in cargo tank motor vehicles. The intended audience 
of this meeting includes members of the cargo tank community, drivers, 
affected government agency representatives, and other interested 
parties. The agenda for the meeting includes reports from industry/
government groups currently working on previously identified safety 
issues, breakout sessions to address the progress and direction of 
these safety issues, and further discussions of other cargo tank safety 
related concerns.
    The purpose of the meeting is to develop partnerships with 
government, industry, and other persons in an attempt to gather 
information and comments on cargo tank safety and the prevention of 
accidents in these types of vehicles on our highways. Although the 
meeting will be open to the public, space will be extremely limited; 
therefore, the FHWA requests that persons interested in attending the 
meeting preregister by contacting the persons listed below at least one 
week in advance of the meeting. The agenda is an aggressive one and 
discussions will be limited due to time constraints; however, comments 
relative to this topic may be directed to the contact persons at the 
address noted below.

DATES: This public meeting will be held at the following location on 
July 9 and 10, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Tysons Westpark Hotel, 8401 Westpark Drive, McLean, VA 
22102.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William A. Quade, Office of Motor 
Carrier Safety and Technology, Safety and Hazardous Materials Division 
(202) 366-0476 or Mr. Stephen A. Keppler, Office of Motor Carrier 
Safety and Technology, Safety and Hazardous Materials Division (202) 
366-2978; FAX:(202) 366-7908. Federal Highway Administration, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:15 
a.m. to 4:45 p.m., EST, Monday through Friday except Federal holidays.

    Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.

    Issued on: June 21, 1996.
George L. Reagle,
Associate Administrator for Motor Carriers.
[FR Doc. 96-16326 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Diane S. Button, certify that: 1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cactus Ventures, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  August 12, 2008  /s/ Diane S. Button Diane S. Button President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3833

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994

to allow certain grant funds to be used to provide parent education.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 17, 1996

Mr. DICKS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Economic and

Educational Opportunities, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement

Act of 1994 to allow certain grant funds to be used

to provide parent education.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PARENT EDUCATION SYSTEM.

4 Section 30201(a)(2) of the Violent Crime Control and

5 Law Enforcement Act of 1994 is amended by adding at

6 the end the following:

7 ‘‘(O) Voluntary, comprehensive, and cul8 turally-appropriate home visitor systems that
2

•HR 3833 IH

1 provide parenting education that focuses on

2 parenting skills, child development, child health,

3 and support services for new parents to prevent

4 or decrease the risk of child abuse. To avoid du5 plication of services, a system developed pursu6 ant to this paragraph shall be coordinated with

7 other organizations that provide services to chil8 dren, particularly infants.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHANNON LOCKRIDGE,

Petitioner,

v

NICK J. LUDWICK,

 

Respondent.

 /

Case No. 09-10145

DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAG. JUDGE PAUL J. KOMIVES

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Komives’ Report and

Recommendation [Docket #11] filed November 30, 2009. The

Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant petitioner’s

motion to hold the petition in abeyance and then deny the

respondent’s motion to dismiss as moot. No objections were

filed.

Having reviewed the file, the Court ADOPTS the Report and

Recommendation.

Accordingly, petitioner’s motion to hold the petition in

abeyance [Docket #10] is GRANTED and this case is STAYED

conditioned on petitioner’s (1) commencing state court

proceedings on his unexhausted claims within 30 days of this

order, and (2) returning to this Court and seeking a lifting of

the stay within 30 days of the conclusion of the state court

proceedings.

2:09-cv-10145-AJT-PJK Doc # 12 Filed 12/28/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 229
It is further ordered that the respondent’s motion to

dismiss [Docket #6] is DENIED as moot.

To avoid administrative difficulties, the Court ORDERS the

Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case for statistical purposes only. 

Nothing in this order or in the related docket entry shall be

considered a dismissal or disposition of this matter. See Sitto

v. Bock, 207 F. Supp. 2d at 677. 

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

Arthur J. Tarnow

United States District Judge

Dated: December 28, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served

upon parties/counsel of record on December 28, 2009, by

electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Catherine A. Pickles 

Judicial Secretary

2:09-cv-10145-AJT-PJK Doc # 12 Filed 12/28/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 230
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3764

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor Management

Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional remedies in certain unfair

labor practice cases, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 9, 1996

Mr. HINCHEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Labor

Management Relations Act, 1947, to permit additional

remedies in certain unfair labor practice cases, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Labor Relations Rem5 edies Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. BOARD REMEDIES.

7 Section 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act

8 (29 U.S.C. 160(c)) is amended by inserting after the
2

•HR 3764 IH

1 fourth sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘If the Board

2 finds that an employee was discharged as a result of an

3 unfair labor practice, the Board in such order shall (1)

4 award back pay in an amount equal to three times the

5 employee’s wage rate at the time of the unfair labor prac6 tice and (2) notify such employee of such employee’s right

7 to sue for punitive damages and damages with respect to

8 a wrongful discharge under section 303 of the Labor Man9 agement Relations Act, 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), as amend10 ed by the Labor Relations Remedies Act of 1995.’’.

11 SEC. 3. COURT REMEDIES.

12 Section 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act,

13 1947 (29 U.S.C. 187), is amended by adding at the end

14 the following new subsections:

15 ‘‘(c) It shall be unlawful, for purposes of this section,

16 for any employer to discharge an employee for exercising

17 rights protected under the National Labor Relations Act

18 (29 U.S.C. 158).

19 ‘‘(d) An employee whose discharge is determined by

20 the National Labor Relations Board under section 10(c)

21 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 160(c))

22 to be as a result of an unfair labor practice under section

23 8 of such Act may file a civil action in any district court

24 of the United States, without respect to the amount in

25 controversy, to recover punitive damages or if actionable,
3

•HR 3764 IH

1 in any State court to recover damages based on a wrongful

2 discharge.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3803 Received in Senate (RDS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3803

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 1996

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize funds for the George Bush School of Government and Public 
                                Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``George Bush School of Government and 
Public Service Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANT AUTHORIZED.

    In recognition of the public service of President George Bush, the 
Secretary of Education is authorized to make a grant in accordance with 
the provisions of this Act to assist in the establishment of the George 
Bush Fellowship Program, located at the George Bush School of 
Government and Public Service of the Texas A & M University.

SEC. 3. GRANT CONDITIONS.

    No payment may be made under this Act except upon an application at 
such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such 
information as the Secretary of Education may require.

SEC. 4. APPROPRIATIONS AUTHORIZED.

    There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1997 such 
sums, not to exceed $3,000,000, as may be necessary to carry out the 
provisions of this Act.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1996.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
BioRestorative Therapies, Inc.


555 Heritage Drive, Suite 130


Jupiter, Florida 33458


 


March 12, 2014


 


TDA Consulting Services, Inc.


333 Las Olas Way #1506


Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301


Attention: Todd Adler, President


 


Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to
the Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2011, between BioRestorative Therapies, Inc. (formerly Stem Cell Assurance,
Inc.) (the “Company”) and TDA Consulting Services, Inc. (the “Consultant”), as amended by the letters,
dated April 18, 2012 and December 7, 2012, between the Company and the Consultant with respect thereto (the “Consulting Agreement”).


 


As additional compensation
for the Services (as defined in the Consulting Agreement), (i) concurrently with the execution of this letter, the Consultant is
being granted a warrant for the purchase of one hundred thousand (100,000) shares of the Company’s common stock, $.001 par
value (“Common Stock”), which warrant shall be exercisable for a period of five (5) years, at an exercise price of
fifty-three cents ($0.53) per share and (ii) the Company agrees that the exercise prices for the warrants held by the Consultant,
dated April 18, 2012 and March 11, 2013, for the purchase of an aggregate of two hundred eighty thousand (280,000) shares of Common
Stock (the “Outstanding Warrants”) are reduced to fifty-three cents ($0.53) per share and the Outstanding Warrants,
as well as the warrant held by Consultant, dated August 5, 2009, for the purchase of 20,000 shares of Common Stock, shall remain
exercisable until the fifth anniversary of the date hereof.


 


Except as amended hereby,
the Consulting Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	BIORESTORATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	 	Mark Weinreb
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer


Agreed:


 


TDA CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.


 


	By:	 	 
	 	Todd Adler	 
	 	President