alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 367 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 367

               To repeal the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To repeal the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CUBAN DEMOCRACY ACT.

    The Cuban Democracy Act of 1992 (22 U.S.C. 6001 et seq.) is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 10, 2015

NO. 03-14-00644-CV

Jose A. Perez, Appellant

v.

Texas Medical Board and Mari Robinson, JD, in her Official Capacity, Appellees

APPEAL FROM 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on September 18, 2014. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the district court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT 20
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE



Harry Puglisi, Treasurer of The Money Store Auto Finance, Inc. (the "Servicer"),
in accordance with Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement
("Agreement") dated as of May 31, 1997 wherein The Money Store Auto Finance,
Inc., is the "Servicer" states the following:


          (i)  a review of the activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of its
               performance under the Agreement has been made under my
               supervision;


          (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has
               fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout 1997
               and there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such
               obligation.



THE MONEY STORE AUTO FINANCE, INC.




BY:  /S/ HARRY PUGLISI
     -------------------
     Harry Puglisi
     Treasurer
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company Limited (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Si Xian Min, President of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: June 29, 2005 By:
    
    /s/ Si Xian MinName: Si Xian MinTitle: President
  *
    
    This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 31 9 . MATTHEW ROBERT KRASKEY v . THE STATE.

Fo l l owi n g a b en ch t ri al
, t h e Do o l y Co un t y Pro bat e Co urt co n v i ct ed M at t h ew Kras k ey o f v i o l at i ng t h e Sp en cer Pas s Law, OCGA § 4 0 -6 -1 6 , a m i s d em ean or t raffi c

o ffen s e. Kras k ey

t hen fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal t o t h is Co u rt . W e l ack ju ri s di ct i o n

. Ap p eal s fro m p ro b at e co u rt co n v i ct i o n s fo r m i s d em ean o r t r a f f i c o ffen s es l i e i n t h e s u p eri o r co u rt , n o t i n t h i s Co u rt

. See O CGA § § 4 0 -1 3 -2 1 (a) & (b ); 4 0 -1 3 -2 8; S t a t e v. R i

g d o n , 2 8 4 Ga. Ap p

. 7 8 5 , 7 8 5 , n

. 1 (6 4 5 SE2 d 1 7) (2 00 7 ); Po wer v. S t a t e , 2 3 1 Ga. Ap p

. 3 3 5 , 3 3 5 -3 3 6 (4 9 9 SE2 d 3 5 6 ) ( 1 9 9 8 )

. U n d er Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 1 1 (b ), “ [w] h en an ap p eal o r ap p l i cat i o n fi l ed i n t h is Co u rt i s wi t h i n t h e j u ri s d i ct i o n

o f an o t h er co u rt , it s h al l b e t r a n s f erred by o rd er t o t h at co urt .” Co n seq u en t l y , t h i s
ap p e a l is h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e D o o l y Co un t y Su p eri o r Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. October 06, 2017

10/06/2017
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 147 (Wednesday, July 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 44267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17472]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of June 
24-25, 2008

    In accordance with Sec.  271.25 of its rules regarding availability 
of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic 
policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its 
meeting held on June 24-25, 2008.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\[thinsp]Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market 
Committee meeting on June 24-25, 2008, which includes the domestic 
policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request 
to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, 
D.C. 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve 
Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in 
the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent 
with maintaining the federal funds rate at an average of around 2 
percent.
    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, July 17, 2008.

Brian F. Madigan,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. E8-17472 Field 7-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 1 of 9    Pg ID 2136

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 2 of 9    Pg ID 2137

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 3 of 9    Pg ID 2138

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 4 of 9    Pg ID 2139

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 5 of 9    Pg ID 2140

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 6 of 9    Pg ID 2141

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 7 of 9    Pg ID 2142

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 8 of 9    Pg ID 2143

2:09-cv-11095-AJT-PJK   Doc # 149    Filed 08/08/12   Pg 9 of 9    Pg ID 2144
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                         765,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,090,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                    86,000
<INVENTORY>                                    106,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,243,334
<PP&E>                                       6,895,428
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,758,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,224,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,012,369
<BONDS>                                      3,212,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       181,646
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,057,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,224,384
<SALES>                                     17,092,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,550,300
<CGS>                                       16,288,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,671,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             247,501
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (368,966)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,397)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (366,569)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (366,569)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Piedmont Community Bank Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Drew Hulsey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Julie Simmons, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Drew HulseyDrew Hulsey, C.E.O.(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Julie SimmonsJulie Simmons, C.F.O.(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


November 14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT-912-06-0777-52]


Meeting of the Utah Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Utah.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting of the Utah Resource Advisory Council.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Utah Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 1996, at the Bureau of Land Management's 
Utah State Office, Room 302, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, 
Utah. The entire meeting will be devoted to the preparation of draft 
Standards & Guidelines for grazing management. RAC meetings are open to 
the public. A 30-minute comment period, whereby members of the public 
may address the Council, is scheduled at 9:00 a.m. Any member of the 
public interested in addressing the Council should contact Sherry Foot, 
Special Programs Coordinator, (801) 539-4195, by July 10, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherry Foot, Utah State Office, Bureau 
of Land Management, 324 South State Street, Salt Lake City, 84111; 
phone (801) 539-4195 or 539-4021.

    Dated: June 19, 1996.
David Little,
Utah BLM Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 96-16442 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P-M
AYI-2014.02.28-EX10(iii)A(2)


Exhibit 10(iii)A(2)




AMENDMENT No. 4
TO
ACUITY BRANDS, INC
AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of the 28th day of March, 2014, by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and VERNON J. NAGEL (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Severance Agreement, dated as of January 20, 2004 (“Severance Agreement”), and amended as of April 21, 2006, September 29, 2006, and October 28, 2009,  providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


1.
Section 4.2 is hereby amended by deleting “150%” from clause (i) and substituting “200%” in lieu thereof.
2.
This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.




	
			
	COMPANY
ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
/s/ Richard K. Reece


	 
	EXECUTIVE
/s/ Vernon J. Nagel

	BY: Richard K. Reece
Executive Vice President & CFO
	 
	VERNON J. NAGEL
H. Res. 955 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 9, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

4213) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

certain expiring provisions, and for other purposes. All points 

of order against consideration of the bill are waived except 

those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to 

recommit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7761

AMOS SAYSAY, a/k/a Amos Sayson,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES ROBE, Chief of Police, Howard County;

MARY LEVY, employee of Howard County Police

Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA96-1996-DKC)

Submitted: January 28, 1997 Decided: February 13, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Amos Saysay, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County Solicitor, Frank Todd Taylor, COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE, Ellicott City,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). To the extent Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his equal

protection claims without prejudice, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,

10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). As for Appellant's other claims, we

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the remainder of the

order on the reasoning of the district court. Saysay v. Robe, No.

CA-96-1996-DKC (D. Md. Oct. 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
1

William Delgado

From: William Delgado

Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:02 AM

To: enrico.schaefer@traverselegal.com; 'Cathy Dittrich'

Subject: RE: Joint Planning Conference Report

Attachments: image001.gif; image003.jpg

Enrico,

I need to confer with my client to discuss the deadlines but, unfortunately, he is out of the country until Tuesday.  I will

speak to him on Tuesday morning and get back to you as soon as possible thereafter.

Will

From: Enrico Schaefer [mailto:enrico@traverselegal.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:55 AM 

To: William Delgado; 'Cathy Dittrich' 

Subject: Joint Planning Conference Report 

William:

Find attached a proposed Joint Conference Report consistent with our conference yesterday. I have also attached a .pdf 

version with my thoughts and explanations. Finally, I will Cathy from my office send you previous orders entered by our 

Judge for your review. Our Order is consistent with the approach in this previous case, although the discovery period we 

propose and related dates are longer. 

If you agree with our proposed dates, let me know. If you have counter-proposals, let me know as well. Recall that we 

can avoid the hearing on Jan 11 if we can reach agreement on this report. 

Enrico Schaefer, Attorney  

Traverse Legal, PLC  

TraverseLegal.com

enrico.schaefer@traverselegal.com  

231‐932‐0411 (office)  

231‐313‐0564 (cell)  

231‐932‐0636 (fax)

Internet:  Web Law and Information Technology Update  

  Trademark:  Global Registration, Monitoring & Protection

  Piracy: Pursuing Cybersquatters Under the UDRP & ACPA  

  Monetization: Defending Generic Domain Portfolios  

  New Media:  Copyright, DMCA & On‐Line Content Protection  

  E‐Commerce: Contracts, Licensing, Policies & Deal Making  

  Trade Secrets: Non‐Competes, Trade Secrets & Market Position  

  Governance: Director, Manager & Fiduciary Liability.  

  General Counsel: Outsourced GC Services.

  

This email contains confidential information.  If you received it in error, please delete it and notify the sender.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




In
connection with the periodic report of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Dean R. Marks, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.





Date:
      November 15, 2010
              /s/ Dean R. MarksDean
      R. MarksChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
2:08-cr-20385-PDB-PJK Doc # 69 Filed 06/04/12 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 485
2:08-cr-20385-PDB-PJK Doc # 69 Filed 06/04/12 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 486
2:08-cr-20385-PDB-PJK Doc # 69 Filed 06/04/12 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 487
#### Noriel SNIDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67732.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 21, 1995.

*818Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and WHITE, Special Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Appellant’s motion to strike supplemental transcript is sustained. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Paul Donaldson, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp.

 

Date: August 19, 2013

 

By:	*/s/ Paul Donaldson*	

Paul Donaldson

Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.59



 Exhibit 10.59 

Waiver of Redemption and Demand Registration 

Series                 Preferred Stock 

The undersigned holder (the “Holder”) of the
Series                 Preferred Stock (the “Series Preferred”) of First Physician’s Capital Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), hereby irrevocably waives (i) the Holder’s rights with respect to redemption upon a “Triggering Event” (as that term is defined in the Certificate of Designation of the
Series                 Preferred (the “Certificate of Designation”)) set forth in Section V.B of the Certificate of Designation and (ii) any right
or claim pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designation to demand the filing by the Company or any other party of a “Registration Statement” (as that term is defined in the Certificate of Designation). 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Holder has caused this Waiver to be executed as of the date set forth below. 

Number of shares of Series                 Preferred held by
Holder:                         
  

											
	If Holder is an individual:	 		 	If Holder is an entity:
			
	 	 		 	 
	Signature	 		 		 	Name of Entity	 	
					
	 Printed Name:
	 	 	 		 	By:	 	 
		 		 		 		 	Signature	 	
						
	 Date:
	 	 	 		 		 	Name:	 	 
						
		 		 		 		 	 Title:
	 	 
						
		 		 		 		 	 Date: