alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3.1(e)(ii)



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     TO THE

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                  INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS AND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


                  THE UNDERSIGNED, being Executive Vice President of
International Flavors and Technologies, Inc. (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies that:

                  FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is International Flavors
and Technologies, Inc.

                  SECOND: The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation 
was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on August 7,
1997.

                  THIRD:  Article First of said Certificate of
Incorporation is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

                  "FIRST: The name of the Corporation is
                  International Flavors and Technology, Inc. (the
                  "Corporation")."

                  FOURTH: The foregoing amendment herein certified has been duly
adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Jeffrey S. Hay, Executive Vice President,
has duly executed this Certificate of Amendment this 10th day of February, 1998
and affirms, under the penalties of perjury, that the statements herein are
true.


                                                      /s/ Jeffrey S. Hay
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Jeffrey S. Hay
                                                      Executive Vice President



NYFS10...:\80\64980\0003\1948\CRT2028T.570
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance, Education.

# ACTION:

Notice of Upcoming Teleconference Meeting; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains corrections for the notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Thursday, July 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 143), [Page 43214–43215]. The topic of the conference call has been changed.                    

# DATES:

Wednesday, September 10, 2008, beginning at 3 p.m. and ending at approximately 6 p.m.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice should read as follows: The conference call scheduled for September 10 will be a continuation of the August 19 conference call to discuss the following topics: (1) Nomination and selection process for the Committee's officers and (2) the implications of HEA reauthorization for the Committee's activities and plans in FY2009. The election of officers will be scheduled for a later date.

Dated: July 25, 2008.

Dr. William J. Goggin,

Executive Director, Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. E8–17526 Filed 7–30–08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
Exhibit 4.1

                            Form of Share Certificate

               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                                     [LOGO]

                    CUSIP NO. [sample] Pharmacity Corporation

                   AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK: 75,000,000 SHARES
                          PAR VALUE: $0.00001 PER SHARE

                               THIS CERTIFIES THAT

                                    [SAMPLE]

                   IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF __________________

Shares of PHARMACITY CORPORATION Common Stock transferable on the books of the
Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned
by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated:

------------------------------                    ------------------------------
Secretary                                         President

                 [PHARMACITY CORPORATION CORPORATE SEAL NEVADA]

"The shares represented by this certificate have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933. The shares have been acquired for investment and may not
be offered, sold, or otherwise transferred in the absence of an effective
registration statement for the shares under the Securities Act of 1933, or a
prior opinion of counsel satisfactory to the issuer, that registration is not
required under the Act."

Signature must be guaranteed by a firm which is a member of a registered
national stock exchange, or by a bank (other than a savings bank), or a trust
company. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations.

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not on the above list.
<PAGE>
For Value Received, _______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

--------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code or assignee)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                     Shares
----------------------------------------------------

of the capital stock represented by the within certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint

                                                     Attorney
----------------------------------------------------

to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated:
      -------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as
written upon the face of the certificate in every particular without alteration
or enlargement or any change whatever
feder law office, p.a.

attorneys and counselors at law

harold feder •

bruce feder ••

• admitted in arizona and wyoming

•• admitted in arizona and washington dc

•• certified specialist in criminal law

 state bar of arizona

biltmore lakes corporate center, suite 160

2930 e. camelback road

phoenix, arizona 85016

telephone (602) 257-0135

facsimile (602) 954-8737

September 26, 2023

Sent via email to:

The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Court - Phoenix Division

Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse

401 W. Washington Street, SPC 625

Courtroom 605

Phoenix, AZ 85004

humetewa_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov

Criminal Justice Act (CJA) Unit - Phoenix Division 

cja_evoucher@azd.uscourts.gov

Re: USA v. Michael Lacey, et al., CR18-00422-PHX-DJH

Letter of Explanation for Daily Transcript Request for Hearing on 08.18.23

Your Honor:

Defense Counsel is requesting the transcript for the hearing held on August 18, 2023, and 

it is being requested on a daily-turnaround timeframe. The reason for the expeditious turn- around 

time request is that we are currently in trial in this matter, and this transcript is being ordered for 

purposes of being used during the cross-examination of the witness currently on the stand.

Thank you.

Very truly yours,

s/ Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand, Esq.

JB/yc

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1819-1 Filed 09/28/23 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2008-7-0067); Dockets DOT-OST-2008-0066 and DOT-OST-2008-0067. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding Priester Aviation, LLC, fit, willing, and able, and awarding it certificates of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail. 

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than August 8, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Dockets DOT-OST-2008-0066 and DOT-OST-2008-0067 and addressed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785. 

Dated: July 23, 2008. 

Michael W. Reynolds, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. E8-17460 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 395 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 134
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 395

                          [Report No. 104-362]

 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be 
 constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia 
   Streets in Reno, Nevada, as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mrs. Vucanovich introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                           November 28, 1995

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be 
 constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia 
   Streets in Reno, Nevada, as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse and Federal building to be constructed 
at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia Streets in 
Reno, Nevada, is designated as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
Courthouse and Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the courthouse and Federal building 
referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference to the ``Bruce R. 
Thompson United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 134

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 395

                          [Report No. 104-362]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building to be 
 constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty and South Virginia 
   Streets in Reno, Nevada, as the ``Bruce R. Thompson United States 
                   Courthouse and Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 28, 1995

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHARLES JONES,

Plaintiff,

CASE NO. 2:09-CV-11283

v. JUDGE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL J. KOMIVES

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LEE,

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MASSENGILL,

and MONROE COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants. 

 /

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO GIVE NOTICE (docket #27) AND

CONSTRUING MOTION AS A RESPONSE BRIEF

This prisoner civil rights case is before the Court on defendants’ motion for summary

judgment, with respect to which a Report and Recommendation has been filed on this date. In

addition to a response and supplemental response to the motion for summary judgment, plaintiff

filed a “Motion to Give Notice” on October 6, 2010. This motion is not a proper motion. It does

not seek any relief or order from the Court. See Melendez v. United States, 518 U.S. 120, 126 (1996)

(quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1013 (6th ed. 1990)) (“[T]he term ‘motion’ generally means ‘[a]n

application made to a court or judge for purpose of obtaining a rule or order directing some act to

be done in favor of the applicant.’”); Knickerbocker v. Artuz, 198 F. Supp. 2d 415, (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

(quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1031 (7th ed. 1999) (“A motion is an application for relief

addressed to a court. More precisely, it is, ‘A written or oral application requesting a court to make

a specified ruling or order.’”). Thus, the “motion” is more properly characterized as a supplemental

response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Robinson v. Sobina, No. 09-247, 2011

2:09-cv-11283-LPZ-PJK Doc # 37 Filed 03/02/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 292
2

WL 6056894, at *11 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 06, 2011); Lawrence v. Parker, No. 3:05-0627, 2007 WL

2746935, at *1 n.1 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 17, 2007).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Give Notice is hereby DENIED. It

is further ORDERED that the motion is hereby construed as a supplemental response to defendants’

motion for summary judgment. The Motion to Give Notice, so construed, is considered in the

Report and Recommendation filed on this date. The attention of the parties is drawn to FED.R.CIV.

P. 72(a), which provides a period of fourteen days from the date of this Order within which to file

any objections for consideration by the District Judge as may be permissible under 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Paul J. Komives 

PAUL J. KOMIVES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: March 2, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of this document was sent to

Charles Jones

657191 

5156 William Fox Lane 

Ottawa Lake, MI 49267 

and parties of record on March 2, 2012 by electronic and/or U.S. Mail.

S/Michael Williams

Relief Case Manager for the Honorable 

Paul J. Komives

2:09-cv-11283-LPZ-PJK Doc # 37 Filed 03/02/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 293
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30881 Summary Calendar

LAURANCE W. BROOKS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-290-D

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: *

Exxon Mobil Corporation appeals from the district court’s partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Laurance Brooks, Jr. The distr ict court entered judgment declaring that under a lease agreement between the parties Exxon Mobil is obligated to replace a building that it removed fr om property owned by Brooks. Exxon Mobil argues that the district court erroneously granted the declaratory judgment because Brooks failed to request such reliefNo. 04-30881 -2- in his complaint and because the lease agreement permits Exxon Mobil to remove the building at issue without replacing it. This court reviews a district co urt’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same criteria as the district court. C aboni v. General Motors Corp., 278 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir. 2002). Following a thorough review of the record and the briefs, we affirm the judgment for essentially the reasons given by the district court.

AFFIRMED.
II

Calendar No. 256

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 395

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 6, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse and Federal

building to be constructed at the southeastern corner

of Liberty and South Virginia Streets in Reno, Nevada,

as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse

and Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 395 PCS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse and Federal building

3 to be constructed at the southeastern corner of Liberty

4 and South Virginia Streets in Reno, Nevada, is designated

5 as the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse

6 and Federal Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

9 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

10 courthouse and Federal building referred to in section 1

11 is deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bruce R. Thompson

12 United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives December 5,

1995.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By LINDA NAVE,

Deputy Clerk.

Calendar No. 256

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 395

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse and

eral Building’’.Thompson United States Courthouse and FedStreets in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Bruce R.eastern corner of Liberty and South VirginiaFederal building to be constructed at the southDECEMBER 6, 1995

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
#### Lawrence Otto FRAZEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42319.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 17, 1990.

Patrick O’Brien, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Frazee appeals the denial, after an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 20, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18I0213. THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. KAY FELTES et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STCV1701252
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                             633,597
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      452,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,657,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,762,539
<PP&E>                                           6,851,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,571,073)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,308,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,173,459
<BONDS>                                          9,486,310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            66,414
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,417,371)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,308,812
<SALES>                                          5,768,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,768,143
<CGS>                                            6,031,334
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,052,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    58,997
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 998,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,970,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,970,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,970,054)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.10)
                                               


</TABLE>