alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY ANDREWS, 

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-11462

vs.

HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

CITY OF DETROIT, et al.

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL SETTLEMENT [DOC. 40]

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel settlement. 

Counsel for both parties appeared before the court on March 23, 2011 and agreed to the

factual allegations in plaintiff’s motion. A settlement in the amount of $90,000 was

negotiated in November 2010, and confirmed by the City of Detroit’s law department on

December 7, 2010. However, the plaintiff did not receive confirmation that the

settlement had been presented to City Council, nor did plaintiff receive a settlement

check, prompting the filing of the present motion on February 8, 2011. 

At the hearing, the court was informed that the settlement has now been approved

by City Council, and that the City’s Finance Office needs tax information from plaintiff’s

counsel in order to issue the settlement check. Plaintiff’s counsel provided the requested

information to the City within an hour of the request being made. Now, therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for entry of judgment in the

amount of $90,000.00 is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that attorney fees in the amount of $500.00

are to be added to the amount of the judgment, for a total judgment of $90,500.00.

2:09-cv-11462-GCS-PJK Doc # 42 Filed 03/24/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 139
2

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that if the judgment is not paid as of April

11, 2011, the judgment is to be amended to include interest from February 1, 2011 until

entry of the judgment, and judgment interest thereafter. In addition, a penalty of $100

per week will be added to the judgment amount commencing on April 11, 2011 until the

judgment is paid. 

When all sums identified in this order have been satisfied by defendant City of

Detroit, the judgment will be set aside and dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

So ordered. 

Dated: March 24, 2011

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

March 24, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Marcia Beauchemin

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-11462-GCS-PJK Doc # 42 Filed 03/24/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 140
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3607

To amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known

as the Paperwork Reduction Act, to ensure that Federal agencies give

priority to reducing paperwork burdens on small businesses having 50

or fewer employees.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1996

Mr. SANDERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on Small Business, for a period to be subsequently determined by

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly known as the Paperwork Reduction Act, to ensure

that Federal agencies give priority to reducing paperwork

burdens on small businesses having 50 or fewer employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3607 IH

1 SECTION 1. PRIORITY TO REDUCING PAPERWORK BUR2 DENS ON CERTAIN SMALL BUSINESSES.

3 Chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code, popularly

4 known as the Paperwork Reduction Act, is amended as

5 follows:

6 (1) Section 3501(1) is amended by inserting

7 ‘‘microenterprises,’’ after ‘‘small businesses,’’.

8 (2) Section 3502 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’

9 after the semicolon at the end of paragraph (13)(D),

10 by striking the period at the end of paragraph (14)

11 and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the

12 following new paragraph:

13 ‘‘(15) the term ‘microenterprise’ means a per14 son—

15 ‘‘(A) engaged in business solely in the

16 United States or its territories; and

17 ‘‘(B) that employs 50 or fewer individ18 uals.’’.

19 (3) Section 3504 is amended—

20 (A) in subsection (a)(1)(B)(i) by inserting

21 ‘‘, especially burden affecting microenterprises’’

22 before the semicolon at the end;

23 (B) in subsection (c)(3) by inserting ‘‘,

24 microenterprises,’’ after ‘‘individuals’’; and

25 (C) in subsection (c)(5) by inserting ‘‘,

26 with a particular emphasis on potential harmful
3

•HR 3607 IH

1 effects on microenterprises’’ before the period

2 at the end.

3 (4) Section 3505(a)(2) is amended by inserting

4 ‘‘on individuals, microenterprises, and entities most

5 adversely affected’’ before the semicolon.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A 

A CORPORATION OF FRANCE, 

 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 09-10534 

 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

v. 

 

KEITH CHILDRESS 

d/b/a PRACTICAL CATIA, 

 

 Defendant. 

____________________________________/ 

ORDER

 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Emergency Motion to Modify Existing 

Scheduling Order Dates [dkt 176]. Plaintiff agrees that the scheduling dates should be extended, but for a 

shorter period of time than Defendant requests and for varying reasons. This divergence, therefore, 

necessitated Plaintiff’s response to the motion. 

 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) permits modification of a scheduling order only upon a 

showing of “good cause and with the judge’s consent.” The party—or in this case, parties—seeking 

amendment must show that “despite their diligence they could not meet the original deadline.” Leary v. 

Daeschner, 349 F.3d 888, 907 (6th Cir. 2003) (citation omitted). 

The Court concludes that neither party has satisfied Rule 16(b)(4)’s good cause requirement. 

This matter has been pending since February 12, 2009. Further extending this litigation—more than four 

years after the lawsuit commenced—would not serve the interests of judicial efficacy. Moreover, the 

Court afforded the parties more than ample time to conduct the necessary discovery in this case. 

Therefore, the current scheduling order dates shall remain fixed. 

2:09-cv-10534-MOB-MJH Doc # 189 Filed 09/16/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2926
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s 

Emergency Motion to Modify Existing Scheduling Order Dates [dkt 176] is DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 

 U.S. District Judge 

Date: September 16, 2013 

2:09-cv-10534-MOB-MJH Doc # 189 Filed 09/16/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2927
(e) The definition of “Maturity Date” is hereby amended and restated as specified in Schedule1(e) hereto.(f) Section 2.2.1 is amended by deleting the second and third sentences thereof.(g) Section 2.2.7 is hereby amended and restated as follows:“2.2.7 Restructuring FeeBorrower shall pay to Lender, upon the earliest of (a) the Maturity Date, (b) the date of theprepayment of the Loan in full, or (c) the date of the occurrence of an Event of Default (otherthan the Specified Defaults), whether or not the Loan has been declared immediately due andpayable, a fully earned and non-refundable restructuring fee in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000(the “Restructuring Fee”).”(h) Section 2.3.2 is hereby amended as follows:(i) Subsection (b) is amended by deleting “(but after the aggregate outstanding principalamount of the Loan is equal to or less than $60,000,000, if such sale occurs, Borrower shall prepaythe Loan by an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the Net Cash Proceeds of such sale)” and“(but after the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Loan is equal to or less than$60,000,000, if such a sale or refinancing occurs, Borrower shall prepay the Loan by an amountequal to fifty percent (50%) of the Net Cash Proceeds of such sale or refinancing)”;(ii) Subsection (c) is amended by deleting “(but after the aggregate outstanding principalamount of the Loan is equal to or less than $60,000,000, if such issuance occurs, Borrower shallprepay the Loan by an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the Net Cash Proceeds of suchissuance)”;(iii) Subsection (d) is amended by deleting “(but after the aggregate outstanding principalamount of the Loan is equal to or less than $60,000,000, if such dividends or other distributionsare received, Borrower shall prepay the Loan by an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of theamount of such dividends or other distributions)”; and(iv) Subsection (e) is amended by deleting “(or, if applicable, 50% thereof)”.(i) Section 2.3.5 is hereby amended by deleting the proviso thereto.(j) Section 3.1 is hereby amended by deleting the sentence “If Lender or its servicerwithdraws from the Blocked Account an amount sufficient to pay accrued interest on any Payment Dateor any principal then due and there are any amounts remaining in the Blocked Account after suchpayment of accrued interest or such principal amount, Lender shall, so long as no Deferred Amountis outstanding and the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Loan is equal to or less than$60,000,000, transfer, on a monthly basis, fifty percent (50%) ofsuch remaining amounts to any account to which Borrower directs promptly upon receipt of suchdirection.”
 
2

 
(k) Section 5.2.3 is hereby amended by deleting “(or, if applicable, 50% thereof)”.(l) Section 6.1(a)(x) is amended by adding “, the covenants specified in Schedule 1 thereof”before “under the second sentence”.(m) Section 8.6 is amended by deleting:“Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.6(B)

  DESCRIPTION OF SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE WITH MARTIN S. PINSON


         In connection with the resignation of Martin S. Pinson as Chairman of
the Board on March 4, 1999 and as Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company on March 8, 1999, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement and
Mutual Release with Mr. Pinson as of March 8, 1999. The principal terms of the
agreement, are as follows:

-        In consideration of the termination of Mr. Pinson's employment
         agreement and releases by Mr. Pinson, the Company
         -        paid Mr. Pinson $312,500 as severance and agreed to continue
                  certain medical insurance benefits for Mr. Pinson and his
                  family;
         -        accelerated the vesting in full of options to purchase 103,800
                  shares of Common Stock at a price of $17.00 per share, which
                  were originally scheduled to vest one-third on each of
                  September 23, 1998, 1999, and 2000;
         -        conveyed incidental items of personal office equipment to Mr.
                  Pinson, and permitted Mr. Pinson to use the Company's office
                  space in Chevy Chase, Maryland for a period of time; and
         -        provided Mr. Pinson piggyback registration rights.
-        The provisions of Mr. Pinson's employment agreement relating to
         non-recruitment, non-solicitation, and non-competition by him remain in
         effect, as did the provisions relating to indemnification of Mr. Pinson
         by the Company.
-        Mr. Pinson and the Company released each other from claims that he or
         it might have had against the other, including as a result of his
         employment by the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3871 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3871

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 5, 1996

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for 
               certain health maintenance organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT RULE FOR CERTAIN MANAGED 
              CARE ORGANIZATIONS.

    The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act is waived--
            (1) with respect to Catholic Health Services Plan of 
        Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. (doing business as Fidelis Health 
        Plan) and Managed Healthcare Systems of New York, Inc., for 
        contract periods through January 1, 1999, and
            (2) with respect to Health Partners of Philadelphia, Inc., 
        for contract periods through December 31, 1999.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 4, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RON OTLER-EL,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF

TREASURY, HENRY PAULSON, JR.,

Defendant.

___________________________________ /

Case Number: 08-15117

JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Ronald Otler-El filed a complaint on December 11 , 2008, against the Secretary of

the Treasury, Henry Paulson, Jr. Plaintiff alleges that Secretary Paulson did not honor the “Charge

Back of the Bill Exchange” presented to him on December 10, 2007, in violation of U.C.C. 9-105(h).

(Complaint ¶ 4). Plaintiff seeks $100,000,000,000.00 in damages.

“[A] district court may, at any time, sua sponte dismiss a complaint for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when the allegations

of a complaint are totally implausible, attenuated, unsubstantial, frivolous, devoid of merit, or no

longer open to discussion.” Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477, 479 (6th Cir. 1999). The Court finds that

Plaintiff’s complaint is, on its face, totally implausible, frivolous and devoid of merit. 

Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), and denies

Plaintiff’s petition to proceed in forma pauperis as moot.

SO ORDERED.
2

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 17, 2008

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

December 17, 2008.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RM Health
      International, Inc. for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RM Health International, Inc. for
              the
              quarter ended May 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
              Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended May 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operations of RM Health International,
              Inc..
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Randy WestonName:
            Randy
                WestonTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            July
                18, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16619]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Agreement(s) Filed

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice of the filing 
of the following agreement(s) pursuant to section 5 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984.
    Interested parties may inspect and obtain a copy of each agreement 
at the Washington, DC Office of the Federal Maritime Commission, 800 
North Capitol Street, NW., 9th Floor. Interested parties may submit 
comments on each agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within 10 days after the date of the 
Federal Register in which this notice appears. The requirements for 
comments are found in Sec. 572.603 of Title 46 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations. Interested persons should consult this section before 
communicating with the Commission regarding a pending agreement.
    Agreement No.: 203-010099-021.
    Title: International Council of Containership Operators.
    Parties:

    American President Lines, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk
    Atlantic Container Line
    The Australian National Line
    Blue Star Line Ltd.
    The Cast Group Limited
    China Ocean Shipping (Group) Co.
    Cho Yang Shipping Co., Ltd.
    Compagnie Generale Maritime
    Crowley Maritime Corp.
    DSR-Senator Line (Bremen) Gmbh
    Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan) Ltd.
    Hamburg-Sudamerikanische Dampfschifffahrtsgesellschaft Eggert & 
Amsinck
    Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd.
    Hapag-Lloyd AG
    Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.
    Italia di Navigazone, SpA
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc.
    Malaysian International Shipping Corporation Berhad
    Mediterranean Shipping Company S.A.
    Mitsui OSK Lines, Ltd.
    Nippon Yusen Kaisha (NYK Line)
    Nedlloyd Lines B.V.
    Neptune Orient Lines Ltd.
    Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd.
    P&O Containers Line
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
    South African Marine Corp., Ltd.
    Transortacion Maritima Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.
    United Arab Shipping Co. (S.A.G)
    Wilh, Wilhelmsen Lines A/S
    Yangming Marine Transport Corp.
    Zim Israel Navigation Co., Ltd.

    Synopsis: The proposed amendment adds Compagnie Maritime 
D'Affretement as a party to the Agreement.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16619 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
EXHIBIT A


01/18/2007 12:35 FAX 2483474760

IW 25 FRINGE

> SULLIVAN YARD

Boos ga
Pe

BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL
REINFORCING IRON WORKERS’ LOCAL UNION NO, 25
PO, Box 965, 25150 Trans X Drive
Novi, Michigan 48376-0965
Telephone No.: (248) 344-9494
Fax No.: (248) 344-4851

IRON WORKERS’ LOCAL UNION NO. 25 FRINGE
BENEFIT FUNDS.

25130 ‘Trans X Drive, RO. Box 8006
Novi, Michigan 48376-8006
Telephone Now: (248) 347-3100

Fax No.: (248) 347-4760

YRON WORKERS’ LOCAL UNION NO. 25 CREDIT UNION
25150 Trans X Drive, P.O. Box 164
Novi, Michigan 48376-0164
‘Telephone No.: (248) 344-2560
Fax Nou; (248) 344-4316

GREAT LAKES METAL BUILDING ERECTORS

ASSOCIATION, INC.
o THE MICHIGAN CHAPTER ASSOCIATED GENERAL
CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC,

2323 N. Larch

Lensing. Michigen 48906

‘Telephone No.: (517) 371-1550

Fax No: (517) 371-1131

ang

WO486 U.S. Highway 2
Norway, MI 49870

‘Telephone No.: (906) 563-8656
Fax No.t (906) 563-8650

30

ADOFT! TON 0 gee APRIL 1, 2001-2086 PRE-ENGINEERED
TAL BUILDING AGREEMENT

‘The undersigned Employer, forand on-vehalf of itself, Its successors
and assigns, lessees or any entity it controls, owns or represents: scents agrees
to be bound by all provisions of the April 1, 2001 Agreement between
Workers Local No, 25 (Union) end the Grest Lakes Metal Bulldine Boor.
tore Assriaion (GLMBEA) including am, wage r-opener adjustments
under Article EX. Sec, 3(b), This Agreementto adopt and be bound by.
1, 2001 Agreement is not voidable. Notice gay the ‘Union to the GLMB:
pursuant to Article XXT of the April 1, 2091 Agreement is notice to the
Broptoyer and has the same legal force: and effect as though it was
served on the Employer, Unless the Empl.yer notifies the Union to the
‘in writing at least 120 days prior to.1ie expiration date of the April
2001 Agreement (or any subsequent Agicement), the Employer: adopts
anddsbouad by all provisions of any subsequent Agreement between th
Union and the Gi) EA following notic ‘pursuant t9 Article SOCK.

For the Employer:

i : i 4 Tuousterac
Print Company Name: /Yf teal 1.6. STEIAE
Signed By:, Er wa | Peesimenue

z
>
BS

S(DENT

Print Signature/Tide:,

Date: 1224-02

Attest 3960 49% Sr SE
City/State/Zip: *! 4951,
TeleghoneNo:_ Clb) SS 4-794

Fax Now (abe 554-7796

‘Workers’ Compensation Caxgier and Policy No.: 50-0

Acergent Fu 5, 52°
Uneraployment Compensation No,:_/:0 5

State License No.z,

Federal LD. No - 2454 68S

3h
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                           <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        560                 1,311
<SECURITIES>                  0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                 13,030              13,182
<ALLOWANCES>                  85                  60
<INVENTORY>                   5,856               9,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              20,482              27,125
<PP&E>                        57,025              49,927
<DEPRECIATION>                12,195              7,864
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                93,639              99,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         15,700              21,766
<BONDS>                       0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0                   8,250
<PREFERRED>                   0                   0
<COMMON>                      1                   3,316
<OTHER-SE>                    (10,362)            3,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  93,639              99,059
<SALES>                       100,737             93,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              100,737             93,289
<CGS>                         82,732              76,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 93,005              86,025
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              874                 (25)
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            8,771               5,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (1,912)             1,731
<INCOME-TAX>                  228                 1,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,140)             466
<DISCONTINUED>                0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               (4,841)             0
<CHANGES>                     0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                  (6,981)             466
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.000               0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.000               0.000


</TABLE>