alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify
with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  March 13, 2006                             By:  /s/ John E. Parker
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       John E. Parker
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


Date:  March 13, 2006                             By:  /s/ Leslie H. Gordon
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Leslie H. Gordon
                                                       Chief Financial Officer


          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
f8k041014ex4i_yappncorp.htm


Exhibit 4.1


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 




	AMOUNT:  US$3,000,000.00	DUE:  ON DEMAND





 




FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned, Yappn Corp. (the “Payor”) acknowledges itself indebted to and promises to pay on demand to or to the order of Toronto Tree Top Holdings Ltd. (the “Lender”) at 73 Richmond Street West, Suite PH3, Toronto, Ontario M5H 1Z4 or such other address as the Lender may designate from time to time in writing, the principal sum of $3,000,000 in lawful money of the United States of America or such greater or lesser amount as may be due and owing hereunder.  Interest on the outstanding principal amount of this Promissory Note from time to time at 12% per annum calculated daily and payable monthly not in advance shall be payable on the last day of each month, commencing on the 30th day of April, 2014.







In the event the Payor defaults in making any payment due pursuant to this Promissory Note, the Lender will have the option of declaring the entire principal balance of this Promissory Note together with interest at the aforesaid rate to be immediately due and payable in full.







This Promissory Note is subject to the terms of a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) dated 7th day of April, 2014 and made between the Payor, as Borrower, and the Lender and evidences all amounts due and payable by the Payor to the Lender pursuant thereto.  All capitalized terms not defined in this Promissory Note shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Loan Agreement.







Any default pursuant to the Loan Agreement shall constitute a default pursuant to this Promissory Note and any security granted by the Payor to the Lender as security for this Promissory Note.







The Payor shall have the prepayment rights set forth in the Loan Agreement.







The Payor waives and renounces all rights of set-off, at law and equity, it may now or hereafter have against the Lender.







The Payor hereby waives demand, protest and notice of maturity, non-payment or protest and any other requirements necessary to hold the Payor liable as maker of this Promissory Note.







This Promissory Note shall enure to the benefit of the Lender and its successors and assigns and shall be binding upon the Payor and its successors and assigns.


 




  





  











  






 


This Promissory Note shall be fully, completely and freely assignable by the Lender and all parties are directed by the Payor to act accordingly.







This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario.  The Payor and the Lender hereby irrevocably attorn to the jurisdiction of the courts of the Province of Ontario.  A facsimile signature on this Promissory Note shall be fully effective for all purposes and binding on the undersigned, its successors and assigns.







DATED at Toronto this 7th day of April, 2014.


 




	 	
YAPPN CORP.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
Per:   

	/s/ David Lucatch	 
	 	
Name:  David Lucatch – A. S. O.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of
Opencell Biomed Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mislav
Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|April 4, 2011 | /s/ Mislav Pavelic              
|------------- | --------------------------------
|              | Mislav Pavelic, President       
|              | (as Principal Financial Officer)

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 149 (Friday, August 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 45075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-08-021]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date:  August 7, 2008 at 11 a.m.

Place:  Room 101, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status:  Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-457 and 731-TA-1153 (Preliminary) (Certain Tow-
Behind Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof from China)--briefing and vote. 
(The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determinations 
to the Secretary of Commerce on or before August 8, 2008; 
Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be transmitted to 
the Secretary of Commerce on or before August 15, 2008.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 29, 2008.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E8-17754 Filed 7-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2006
    /s/ Ricardo Figueiredo BomenyRicardo Figueiredo BomenyChief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer 77
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00340-CR

Ricardo Rodriguez

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-CR-1401-H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 15, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID KENNEDY,

Petitioner, Case No. 2:09-CV-10218

v HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD

MILLICENT WARREN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Respondent.

________________________________/

JUDGMENT

The above entitled matter having come before the Court on a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus, Honorable Denise Page Hood, a United States District Court Judge,

presiding, and in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on January

27, 2012.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Certificate of Appealability is

DENIED.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 27th, day of January, 2012.

DAVID J. WEAVER 

CLERK OF THE COURT

APPROVED:

BY: s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry

DEPUTY CLERK 

s/Denise Page Hood

HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on January 27, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LaShawn R. Saulsberry 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10218-DPH-MKM Doc # 29 Filed 01/27/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 2082
4:09-cr-20105-LJM-MJH Doc # 17 Filed 03/16/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 70
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ADIL SHAFI, an individual,

Counter-Plaintiff

vs Case No: 09-10454

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

BRAINTECH, INC.,

Counter-Defendant,

and

ROBOTIC VISION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

and FREDERIC WEIDINGER,

Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 11-12909

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

ADIL SHAFI,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

On Monday, August 6, 2012, the Court held a telephone conference. Attending

were Adil Shafi, in pro per; Susan Koval and Anne Widlak representing Braintech; and

Thomas McNeill representing Robotic Vision Technology and Frederick Weidinger. 

Based on the discussion held, the following is ordered: 

1. The Court has given Mr. Shafi sufficient time to find counsel and to have new

counsel file an appearance. New counsel must file an appearance by noon, Friday,

August 10, 2012. That is when the Stay will be lifted. 

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 139 Filed 08/09/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3171
2. The Court will hold an in person status conference on Monday, August 13,

2012 at 4:00 pm. 

3. If counsel for Mr. Shafi does not file an appearance by Friday, August 10,

2013, Mr. Shafi will proceed in pro per and must attend the status conference on August

13, 2012. 

4. If Mr. Shafi retains counsel, he must notify his attorney immediately of the

status conference.

IT IS ORDERED. 

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: August 9, 2012

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

August 9, 2012.

S/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 139 Filed 08/09/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3172
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WOODLAND HARVESTING, INC.,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-10736

-vs- Hon: AVERN COHN

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION,

Defendant. 

/

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

This is a commercial dispute. The parties are having difficulty agreeing on the scope

of discovery. To resolve their differences, each party lodged with the Court a proposed

order. The Court held a status conference on June 01, 2011, at which it defined the scope

of discovery as follows:

1. Defendant is required to produce within thirty (30) days documents relating

to the purchase of defendant by Koch Industries which references the future of the particle

board and consumer products business of defendant.

2. Plaintiff is required to produce within thirty (30) days an itemized statement

of its damages and supporting financial papers.

3. Plaintiff is required to produce within thirty (30) days a list of witnesses to be

called to testify at trial, along with a brief summary of the testimony of the witness to be

offered at trial.

2:09-cv-10736-AC-SDP Doc # 39 Filed 06/03/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 573
2

4. Plaintiff is required to produce within thirty (30) days documents relating to

its purchase of the log sorting production line and stumpage acreage in anticipation of the

sale of wood particles to defendant. 

SO ORDERED.

 S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 3, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record

on this date, June 3, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-10736-AC-SDP Doc # 39 Filed 06/03/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 574
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-50758

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RUTILIO HERNANDEZ, also known as Rudy,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:02-CR-692-3

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rutilio Hernandez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

as Hernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-50758 Document: 00514395802 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
No. 17-50758

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-50758 Document: 00514395802 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
FIRST AMENDMENT TO


EXHIBIT 10.17




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO

THE PHOENIX COMPANIES, INC. 

NON-QUALIFIED EXCESS INVESTMENT PLAN 

As Amended and Restated Effective September 1, 2009




The Phoenix Companies, Inc. Non-Qualified Excess Investment Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective September 1, 2009, further amended on February 24, 2010, December 10, 2010 and January 1, 2012, is further amended effective November 19, 2013, as follows:




1.

Section 2.02 of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:




2.02

“Beneficiary” means the person, persons or entity, including one or more trusts, last designated by a Participant on a form or electronic media and accepted by the Plan Administrator or its duly authorized representative as a beneficiary, co-beneficiary, or contingent beneficiary to receive benefits payable under the Plan in the event of the death of the Participant.  In the absence of any such designation, the Beneficiary shall be (a) the Participant’s surviving spouse or Domestic Partner, (b) if there is no surviving spouse or Domestic Partner, the Participant’s children (including stepchildren and adopted children) per stirpes, or (c) if there is no surviving spouse or Domestic Partner and/or children per stirpes, the Participant’s estate.

2.

Section 2.13A is added to read as follows:




2.13A

“Domestic Partner” with respect to any Participant means a person of the same sex who cohabitates or resides with a Participant and meets each of the following:




(a)

is the Participant's sole domestic partner and intends to remain so indefinitely;




(b)

is unmarried, at least eighteen (18) years of age, and mentally competent to consent to contract;




(c)

is unrelated to the Participant by blood or adoption to a degree of closeness that would prohibit legal marriage in the state in which the Participant and such person reside;




(d)

cohabitates or resides with the Participant as domestic partners and intends to do so indefinitely;




(e)

resides with the Participant in a state that prohibits legal marriage between same sex individuals;




(f)

has lived with the Participant as domestic partners for at least 12 consecutive months;











EXHIBIT 10.17




(g)

is jointly responsible, with the Participant, for their common welfare and financial obligations; and




(h)

provided such person attests to the person's domestic partnership with the Participant in an affidavit filed with the Administrator and provides sufficient proof of their interdependence.




3.

Section 9.02 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:




9.02

Rights Under Savings and Investment Plan.  Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to limit, broaden, restrict, or grant any right to a Participant, Employee, surviving spouse, Domestic Partner or any Beneficiary thereof under the Savings and Investment Plan, nor to grant any additional rights to any such Participant, Employee, surviving spouse, Domestic Partner or Beneficiary thereof under the Savings and Investment Plan, nor in any way to limit, modify, repeal or otherwise affect the Company’s right to amend or modify the Savings and Investment Plan.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 14, 2016

No. 04-16-00387-CR

Veronica ALEGRIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR5021A

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 

(1967); however, the brief is not accompanied by:

(1) a motion to withdraw;

(2) an exhibit showing that counsel has notified appellant that, should 

appellant wish to exercise the right to review the appellate record in preparing to 

file a response to the Anders brief, appellant should immediately file a motion for 

pro se access to the appellate record with this court and provided appellant with 

a form motion for this purpose and a mailing address for this court.

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); Nichols v. State, 954 

S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant’s attorney file the requisite motion and exhibit in 

this court no later than 10 days from the date of this order. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1

 In a separate order issued on this date, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs Harvey

Reese and A.R. from the case sua sponte because their claims were moot.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN HOULE AND HARVEY REESE, and

T.H., by his next friend, ROSE HOULE,

A.R., by her next friend, TONJA PARKER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BARBARA SAMPSON, chair of the

Michigan Parole Board, and the nine board

members: JAMES ATTERBERRY, MIGUEL

BERRIOS, CHARLES BROWN, PAUL

CONDINO, STEPHEN DEBOER, ARTINA

HARDMAN, ANTHONY KING, DAVID

KLEINHARDT, AND LAURIN THOMAS, in

their official capacities,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

Case Numbers: 09-10504

 09-10535

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ADJOURNING

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (09-10504 doc.

25; 09-10535 doc. 21), and Plaintiffs’ Motions for Preliminary Injunction (09-10504 doc. 9;

09-10535 doc. 8). For the reasons discussed on the record at a hearing held on June 3,

2009,

The Court DENIES both of Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.1

2:09-cv-10504-MOB-DAS Doc # 36 Filed 06/08/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 402
2

 The parties should note that this hearing has been moved from the original

August 26, 2009, date.

2

In addition, the Court ADJOURNS both of Plaintiffs’ Motions for Preliminary

Injunction. A hearing on these motions will be held on Monday, August 17, 2009 at 2:30

p.m.2

 The parties may perform discovery through August 7, 2009. Defendants may file an

additional brief by August 3, 2009, and Plaintiffs may file an additional brief by August 12,

2009. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: June 8, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon counsel of record on this date by ordinary

mail and/or electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Deputy Clerk

2:09-cv-10504-MOB-DAS Doc # 36 Filed 06/08/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 403
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3593

To require that reductions in force procedures under the new personnel

management system of the Federal Aviation Administration be subject

to veterans’ preference.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 6, 1996

Mr. BUYER (for himself, Mr. FILNER, and Mr. SOLOMON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and

Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform

and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require that reductions in force procedures under the

new personnel management system of the Federal Aviation Administration be subject to veterans’ preference.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VETERANS’ PREFERENCE REQUIRED FOR RE4 DUCTIONS IN FORCE IN THE FEDERAL AVIA5 TION ADMINISTRATION.

6 Section 347(b) of the Department of Transportation

7 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996 (109 Stat.
2

•HR 3593 IH

1 460) is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para2 graph (6), by striking the period at the end of paragraph

3 (7) and inserting ‘‘; and’’, and by adding at the end the

4 following:

5 ‘‘(8) sections 3501–3504, as such sections re6 late to veterans’ preference.’’.

Æ