alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
file10.htm


     

    EXHIBIT
10.27


    AMENDMENT
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     

    This Amendment (this
“Amendment”)
to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated December 30, 2008 between
Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd. (the “Company”)
and Barton Hedges (the “Executive”)
(the “Employment
Agreement”) is entered into this 18th day of
February 2009.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings given them in the Employment
Agreement.

     

    RECITALS

     

    Whereas,
the Company employs the Executive as its President and Chief Underwriting
Officer pursuant to the Employment Agreement;
and

     

    Whereas,
the parties have determined it to be in their best interests to amend the
Employment Agreement to increase the Executive’s Base Salary effective as of
January 1, 2009.

     

    Now,
Therefore,
Be It
Resolved, that in consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and
agreements herein contained, the parties agree as
follows:

     

    Resolved,
effective as of January 1, 2009 the first sentence of Section 5(a) of the
Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as
follows:

     

    “During
the Employment Period, the Company shall pay Executive a base salary at the rate
of not less than US $500,000 per year (“Base
Salary”).”

     

    Further
Resolved, that except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Amendment,
all provisions, terms and conditions in the Employment Agreement remain
unmodified and in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement is hereby
in all respects ratified and confirmed.

     

    Further
Resolved, that this Amendment, together with the Employment Agreement,
sets forth the entire agreement and understanding of the parties relating to the
subject matter herein.  No modification of or amendment to this
Amendment, nor any waiver
of any rights under this Amendment, shall be effective unless given in a writing
signed by the party to be charged.

     

    Further
Resolved, that this Amendment may be executed in duplicate counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which, taken
together, shall constitute one agreement.

    
       

    

     

     

    [signature
page follows]

     


    
      
        
                                                               


        

         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of
the date first written above.

    
       

    

    
       

      
      

       

      
        	 	GREENLIGHT
      REINSURANCE, LTD.	 
	 	 	 
	 	
                
                  By: /s/
      Leonard Goldberg  

                

              	 
	 	Name:  Leonard
      Goldberg	 
	 	
                Title:  CEO
      and Director

              	 


      

       

       

    

    
       

    

    
       

      
      

       

      
        	 	EXECUTIVE	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Barton
      Hedges	 
	 	
                Barton
      Hedges
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    GREGORY S. WEISHAR                                             
|Gregory S. Weishar
Chief Executive Officer and Director
August 5, 2010
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE AS SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary M. Sawka, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: November 5, 2010





By:
/s/ GARY M. SAWKAGary M. SawkaInterim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Gary L. WhitlockGary
      L. WhitlockExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 11,
      2009
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Phoenix International Ventures, Inc.
(“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“the Report”),
I, Zahir Teja, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)  the
Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




November
      14, 2008
            By:
            /s/  Zahir
      TejaZahir
      TejaPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 309 Filed 04/12/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 7939
125837.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC., 

a Michigan corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

 Case No. 2:09-CV-10756 

vs. Hon. Marianne O. Battani 

 

NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS, INC., 

 a Delaware corporation; CONNEXUS CORP., 

 a Delaware corporation; FIRSTLOOK, INC., 

 a Delaware corporation; and EPIC MEDIA 

 GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

Defendants. 

______________________________________________________________________ 

Enrico Schaefer (P43506) 

Brian A. Hall (P70865) 

TRAVERSE LEGAL, PLC 

810 Cottageview Drive, Unit G-20 

Traverse City, MI 49686 

231-932-0411 

enrico.schaefer@traverselegal.com 

brianhall@traverselegal.com 

Lead Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Anthony P. Patti (P43729) 

HOOPER HATHAWAY, PC 

126 South Main Street 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

734-662-4426 

apatti@hooperhathaway.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

William A. Delgado 

WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & DELGADO 

LLP 

707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3850 

Los Angeles, CA 90017 

(213) 955-9240 

williamdelgado@willenken.com 

Lead Counsel for Defendants 

Nicholas J. Stasevich (P41896) 

Benjamin K. Steffans (P69712) 

BUTZEL LONG, P.C. 

150 West Jefferson, Suite 100 

Detroit, MI 48226 

(313) 225-7000 

stasevich@butzel.com 

steffans@butzel.com 

Local Counsel for Defendants 

______________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, 

INC. 

2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 299 Filed 06/15/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 7918
1 

125837.1 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 

 By stipulation of the parties, final judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff Weather 

Underground, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and against Connexus Corporation, Firstlook, Inc., Basic Fusion, 

Inc., and Navigation Catalyst Systems, Inc. only on the claims in Plaintiff’s First Amended 

Complaint in the amount of three million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000). 

 No prejudgment interest is awarded. 

 Each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 All parties have waived their rights to appeal this judgment. 

DATED this 15th day of June, 2012. 

___s/Marianne O. Battani_______

 Honorable Marianne O. Battani 

United States District Court Judge

2:09-cv-10756-MOB-VMM Doc # 299 Filed 06/15/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 7919
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0221

_________________ PETER GRIGG,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALISON PAUL, Executive Director, and MONTANA LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION,

Defendant an d Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Pet er Grigg, to a ll counsel of re cord , and to the Honorable Amy Eddy , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2023

01/25/2023
Case Number: DA 22-0221
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 148 (Thursday, July 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 44773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 7, 2008, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical and 
Electronics Engineers (``IEEE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 33 new 
standards have been initiated and 13 existing standards are being 
revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at http://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/16-05-08.html and http://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/06-12-08.html. In addition, an 
update to the registration activities associated with 21 existing 
standards is being submitted. More detail regarding this update can be 
found at http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/registrystandards.html.
    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 9, 2008. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on June 17, 2008 (73 FR 34327).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E8-17511 Filed 7-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

CHARLES BLUNT, 

 Petitioner, 

 Case No. 08-CV-14808 

v. 

 HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

MARY BERGHUIS, 

 Respondent. 

 / 

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY (DKT. 35) AS MOOT

 Petitioner, in a pro se habeas petition, challenged his state court convictions pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court denied the petition in an Opinion and Order dated April 5, 2011 

(Dkt. 13), which was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit, see Dkt. 22. Petitioner then filed a motion 

for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b), which the Court 

denied, see 10/15/13 Order (Dkt. 27). Petitioner has appealed the denial of his Rule 60(b) 

motion. 6/24/13 Notice of Appeal (Dkt. 32). After Petitioner appealed, the Court issued an 

Order declining to issue Petitioner a certificate of appealability (COA) (Dkt. 34). In this Order, 

the Court determined that jurists of reason would not find the conclusion that Petitioner’s Rule 

60(b) motion should be denied to be debatable or wrong under Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

483 (2000). 6/30/14 Order at 2 (Dkt. 34). A few hours after the Court issued the Order declining 

the issuance of a COA, the Clerk docketed the matter presently before the Court, Petitioner’s 

motion for a COA (Dkt. 35). Because the Court has already ruled on the matter of issuing a 

COA, the Court denies Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. 35) as moot. 

4:08-cv-14808-MAG-CEB Doc # 36 Filed 07/07/14 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 514
 SO ORDERED. 

Dated: July 7, 2014 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

 Flint, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH 

 United States District Judge 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class 

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on July 7, 2014. 

 s/Deborah J. Goltz 

 DEBORAH J. GOLTZ 

 Case Manager 

4:08-cv-14808-MAG-CEB Doc # 36 Filed 07/07/14 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 515
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Summons in a Civil Case

Kevin J Murray,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:08−cv−15147−LPZ−MKM

Hon. Lawrence P Zatkoff

United States Department of

Treasury, Secretary of, et al.,

Defendant(s).

Notice to Defendant Federal Reserve System

This summons is notification that you are being sued by the above named plaintiff(s). You are

required to:

1. Serve upon the plaintiff's attorney:

Robert J. Muise

24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive

P.O. Box 393

Ann Arbor, MI

48106

an answer to the complaint within sixty (60) days after receiving this summons, or take

other actions that are permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. File with the court any answer that you serve on the parties to this action within the time

limits specified.

Failure to answer or take other actions permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may

result in the issuance of a judgment by default against you for the relief demanded in the

complaint.

David J. Weaver, Clerk of Court By: s/ L. Behringer 

Deputy Clerk

Date of Issuance: December 15, 2008

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM Document 2 Filed 12/15/08 Page 1 of 2
Summons and Complaint Return of Service

Case No. 2:08−cv−15147−LPZ−MKM

Hon. Lawrence P Zatkoff

A copy of the Summons and Complaint has been served upon the Defendant in the manner

indicated below:

Name of Defendant Served: Federal Reserve System

Date of Service:

Method of Service

Personally served at this address:

Left copies at defendant's usual place of abode with (name of person):

Other (specify):

Returned unexecuted (reason):

Service Fees: Travel $ Service $ Total $ 

Declaration of Server

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the information contained in this Return of Service is

true and correct.

Name of Server:

Signature of Server:

Date:

Server's Address:

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM Document 2 Filed 12/15/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**I, Jack P. Healey, Chief Financial Officer of the Industrial Distribution Group, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual periodended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.Dated: March 3, 2006   /s/ Jack P. HealeyJack P. HealeyExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10512

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CESAR ALEJANDRO LOMA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:13-CR-200

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Cesar Alejandro Loma appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty 

plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute 

marijuana. Loma argues that the district court erred by refusing to grant him 

a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. 

§ 3E1.1. He maintains that he was incorrectly denied credit because his 

statement to the probation officer that he was involved in the conspiracy for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10512 Document: 00512939335 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/18/2015
No. 14-10512

three weeks, not three months, does not concern relevant conduct and did not 

impact his guidelines calculation.

We examine the denial of a downward adjustment for acceptance of 

responsibility under a standard of review even more deferential than a pure 

clearly erroneous standard. United States v. Angeles-Mendoza, 407 F.3d 742, 

753 (5th Cir. 2005). We will affirm the denial of a downward adjustment for 

acceptance of responsibility under § 3E1.1 unless the denial is without 

foundation. United States v. Solis, 299 F.3d 420, 458 (5th Cir. 2002). The 

defendant has the burden of demonstrating that he is entitled to a reduction. 

United States v. Perez, 915 F.2d 947, 950 (5th Cir. 1990).

While Loma pleaded guilty and truthfully admitted his offense conduct 

in his factual resume, Lopez minimized his role in the conspiracy by 

diminishing the time period that he was involved in the conspiracy and by 

maintaining that the ledger found in his house was used in his construction 

business rather than to keep records of drug sales. The presentence report and 

addendum, which the district court adopted, relied on both these facts to 

support the denial of the adjustment. A defendant’s attempt to minimize 

conduct provides a sufficient foundation for the denial of a downward 

adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. United States v. Cabrera, 288 F.3d 

163, 175-77 (5th Cir. 2002). Given the foregoing, the district court’s ruling that 

Loma had not accepted responsibility was not clearly erroneous or without 

foundation. See id.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-10512 Document: 00512939335 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/18/2015
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 14-13 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 14-13 Filed 06/12/09 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 14-13 Filed 06/12/09 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ADENA WINSTON,

Plaintiff, 

v.

ZALE CORPORATION, et al.

Defendants. 

 /

Case No. 08-cv-15252

ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE PARTIES’

“JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER”

Pending before the court is the parties’ “Joint Motion to Extend Discovery and

Amend Scheduling Order,” in which the parties seek to extend the time for discovery by

an additional sixty days. During a telephone conference on June 30, 2009, the court

expressed concern that only limited discovery has been completed to date. The court

will, however, grant some additional time to complete discovery and, in turn, adjust

other scheduling deadlines. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ “Joint Motion to Extend Discovery and Amend

Scheduling Order” [Dkt. #13] is GRANTED IN PART. Specifically, the court will grant

the parties six additional weeks, until August 12, 2009, to complete discovery in this

matter. Any dispositive motion, should any party wish to file one, shall be due on or

before August 21, 2009.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial documents, including motions in limine, jury

instructions, and the joint final pretrial order – as referenced in the court’s February 4,

2009 scheduling order at paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 – shall be due on or before

2:08-cv-15252-RHC-SDP Doc # 14 Filed 07/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 128
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\08-15252.WINSTON.Grant.in.Part.Ext.Disc.eew.wpd

2

November 30, 2009. The court will conduct the final pretrial conference, detailed in the

scheduling order at paragraph 11, on December 7, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. Finally, this case

is assigned to the court’s trailing docket for January/February of 2010.

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: July 2, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, July 2, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa G. Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:08-cv-15252-RHC-SDP Doc # 14 Filed 07/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 129