alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 148 (Thursday, July 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 44703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Call for Nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council, 
(NUCFAC) will be filling three positions that will be expiring at the 
end of December 2008. Interested applicants may download a copy of the 
application and position descriptions from the U.S. Forest Service's 
Urban and Community Forestry Web site: http://www.fs.fed.us/ucf/.

DATES: Nomination applications are to be postmarked by September 3, 
2008.

ADDRESSES: Nomination Applications should be addressed to: Nancy 
Stremple, Executive Staff to National Urban and Community Forestry 
Advisory Council, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Yates Building (1 
Central) MS-1151, Washington, DC 20250-1151.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Stremple, Executive Staff or 
Robert Prather, Staff Assistant to National Urban and Community 
Forestry Advisory Council, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Yates 
Building (1 Central) MS-1151, Washington, DC 20250-1151, phone 202-205-
1054.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Please submit hard copy nomination 
applications only.
    Positions to be filled are for:
    <bullet> A person that is not an officer or employee of any 
government body living in a city with a population of more than 50,000 
and who has experience and has been active in urban and community 
forestry.
    <bullet> A person representing academic institutions with an 
expertise in urban and community forestry activities.
    <bullet> A person representing forest products, nursery, or related 
industries.

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Robin L. Thompson,
Associate Deputy Chief, State and Private Forestry.
[FR Doc. E8-17572 Filed 7-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit 1 Braintech’s Third-Party Subpoena to Aptura

Machine Vision Solutions and David Dechow

Exhibit 2 Braintech’s Third-Party Subpoena to

Advenovation, Inc.

Exhibit 3 Shafi’s Employment Agreement

Exhibit 4 Shafi’s Non-Competition Agreement

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 60-1 Filed 11/10/10 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7337

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDRICK DEMOND BATTLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:09-cr-00150-D-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fredrick Demond Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Denise Walker, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fredrick Demond Battle appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Battle, No. 5:09-cr-00150-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief Executive Officer of PharMerica Corporation, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PharMerica Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. [Intentionally omitted] 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

DATE: August 31, 2007
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-13 Filed 11/19/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-13 Filed 11/19/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-13 Filed 11/19/10 Page 3 of 3
# STATEOFLOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

MARY SMITH, INDIVIDUALLYAND ON BEHALF OF CONCERNED MEMBERS OF THE LOUISIANA ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF, INC. VERSUS JIMMY GORE AND JAY ISCH NO. 2022 CW 0955



### SEPTEMBER 02, 2022

InRe: Louisiana Association of the Deaf, Inc., applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 690808.
BEFORE: WELCH, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. WRIT DENIED. The relief sought herein should first be sought with the district court, as there is no evidence before this court regarding the amount sufficient to assure satisfaction of the judgment or of damages for the delay resulting from suspension of execution of the judgment being appealed. SeeLa Code Civ. P. art. 2124(Bl (3).

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

OF COURT FOR THE COURT JEW AHP WIL
Cite as 2023 Ark. 55

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN RE RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 

PANDEMIC––RETURN TO PREPANDEMIC STANDARD FOR 

FINDING OF GOOD-CAUSE DELAYS 

UNDER SPEEDY-TRIAL RULE

Opinion Delivered: March 30, 2023

PER CURIAM

Today, the court announces a return to the pre-COVID-19-pandemic standard for

the finding of “good-cause” delays for speedy-trial purposes. Generally, when a defendant 

makes a prima facie showing of a speedy-trial violation, the burden shifts to the State to show 

that the delay was the result of the defendant’s conduct or was otherwise justified pursuant 

to one or more of the excludable periods outlined in Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 

28.3. E.g., State v. Crawford, 373 Ark. 95, 281 S.W.3d 736 (2008). One of the excludable 

periods outlined in Rule 28.3 is a “period[] of delay for good cause.” Ark. R. Crim. P. 28.3(h).

Thus, prior to the pandemic, the State bore the burden of proving “good cause” to exclude 

a period of delay under subsection (h). During the pandemic, however, this court suspended

in-person proceedings and jury trials at various times and instituted a presumption that 

delays “due to precautions against the COVID-19 pandemic” constitute “good cause” under 

Rule 28.3(h). See In re Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic—Resumption of Jury Trials, 2021 Ark. 

72, at 2 (per curiam); In re Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020 Ark. 384, at 3 (per 

curiam); In re Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020 Ark. 116, at 3 (per curiam).
2

Due to the waning of the pandemic, the court finds that the presumption instituted 

in favor of the State for periods of delay due to precautions against COVID-19 is no longer 

necessary. Effective immediately, future delays due to COVID-19 precautions will no longer 

be presumed “good cause.” As was required before the pandemic, when a defendant presents 

a prima facie showing of a speedy-trial violation, the State will bear the burden of proving 

whether any delay constitutes “good cause” without the benefit of any presumption.

The court understands that COVID-19 precautions may have resulted in recent 

continuances that are ongoing. In cases where the most recent continuance was granted due 

to COVID-19 precautions, the State shall continue to enjoy the presumption of “good cause” 

until (i) the date on which any other continuance is granted, or (ii) the date on which the 

case is currently set for trial, whichever occurs first.

It is so ORDERED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17287]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, July 10, 1996.

LOCATION: Room 420, East West Towers, 4430 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the Public.

Matter to be Considered:

FY 1998 Budget Request

    The Commission will consider issues related to the Commission's 
budget for fiscal year 1998.

    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-0709.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Sadye E. Dunn, Office of the 
Secretary, 4330 East West Highway., Bethesda, MD 20207 (301) 504-0800.

    Dated: July 1, 1996.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-17287 Filed 7-2-96; 2:09 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
**EXHIBIT 99(a)**

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to First SecurityFed Financial, Inc. and will be retained by FirstSecurityFed Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

 

Securities and ExchangeCommission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC  20549

 

Re:  First SecurityFed Financial, Inc.

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

In accordancewith the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1349), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(i)            this Annual Reporton Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(ii)           the information containedin this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of First SecurityFed Financial, Inc.

 

Dated as of this 31st day ofMarch, 2003.

 

 
| /s/ Julian  E. Kulas            |                                           | /s/ Harry  Kucewicz |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Julian E.  Kulas                | Harry  Kucewicz                                |
| Chief  Executive Officer        | Chief  Financial Officer                       |
| (*Principal Executive Officer)* | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-2478

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Johnathan S. Moser

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: October 13, 2015

Filed: October 16, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Johnathan Moser directly appeals the sentence that the district court imposed

1

upon revoking his supervised release, arguing that the 18-month sentence, which is

The Honorable David GregoryKays, Chief Judge, United StatesDistrict Court

1

for the Western District of Missouri.
above the advisory Guidelines range, is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful

review, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (appellate

review of revocation sentence), we conclude that the revocation sentence is not

unreasonable, asthe district court gave sufficient reasons to support the sentence. See

United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 924 (8th Cir. 2006) (affirming statutory

maximum revocation sentence where district court justified decision by giving

supporting reasons). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

-2-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHER DIVISION

HON. PATRICK J.DUGGAN

CIVIL NO.09-10871

CHILDREN’S ORCHARD, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

-VCHILDREN’S ORCHARD STORE #202, ET.AL,

Defendant(s).

 /

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

At a session of said Court held in the

United States Courthouse,in the City of

Detroit, State of Michigan, on May 18, 2009.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J.DUGGAN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court having received a Stipulation for Dismissal but no order having been 

presented; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled case be, and hereby is 

DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the stipulation of the parties filed May 18, 2009.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: May 18, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on May 18, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

 

2:09-cv-10871-PJD-MJH Doc # 8 Filed 05/18/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 29
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers
of Pacific Copper Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July
31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 17, 2010

/s/ Andrew
BrodkeyAndrew Brodkey Chief Executive Officer Pacific Copper Corp.

Dated: September 17, 2010

/s/ Rakesh
MalhotraRakesh Malhotra, C.A., Chief Financial Officer Pacific Copper
Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific
Copper Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
MIE 400 Notice of Motion Hearing Rev. 3/98)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

NAVIGATION CATALYST SYSTEMS, INC, et al,

Defendants.

 /

 

CASE NUMBER: 09-10756

HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI

NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING

You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable Marianne O. Battani, United States

District Judge, for the above proceeding on JULY 08, 2009 @ 2:00 P.M., in Courtroom 272, 231

W. Lafayette Blvd., Detroit, Michigan 48226. The following motion(s) are scheduled for hearing:

# MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 12(B)(2), OR, IN THE

 ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 

 filed by Defendants on April 15, 2009.

The following briefing schedule is to be followed:*

Response Due Date 5/15/09

Reply Due Date (The Court requires a

reply to every response)

6/01/09

Oral Argument 7/08/09 at 2:00 p.m.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this notice was mailed/e-filed to Anthony Patti, Brian Hall/Enrico Schafer and

John Jacobs on this date.

Date: 4/16/09 s/Colette Motowski

Colette Motowski, secretary to 

Hon. Marianne O. Battani 313-234-2625

Weather Underground, Incorporated v. Navigation Catalyst Systems, Incorporated et al Doc. 16

Dockets.Justia.com
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

 District of Arizona

United States of America

Michael Lacey, et al

2:18-CR-00422

United States of America

01/20/2022 /s/ Austin M. Berry

Austin M. Berry, TX 24062615

Child Exploitation & Obscenity Section, Department

of Justice

1301 New York Avenue, NW

11th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005

austin.berry2@usdoj.gov

(202) 412-4136

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1452 Filed 01/20/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 36076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Application for Incidental Take Permit for Mexican Spotted Owl; 
Coconino and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, AZ

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Receipt of Application for Incidental Take Permit for 
Surveying the Species Listed Below for the Coconino and Apache-
Sitgreaves National Forests in Arizona.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

APPLICANT: Dr. Joseph L. Ganey, Flagstaff, Arizona.

SUMMARY: Dr. Joseph L. Ganey has applied to the Fish and Wildlife 
Service (Service) for an incidental take permit pursuant to Section 
10(A)1(a) of the Endangered Species Act, for the purpose of scientific 
research and enhancement of propogation and survival of the species as 
prescribed by Service recovery documents. The applicant has been 
assigned permit number PRT-814833. The requested permit, which is for a 
period of 2 years, would authorize incidental take of the Mexican 
spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida).

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the application may obtain a copy 
by writing to the Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, New Mexico 
87103. The request must be received by the Assistant Regional Director 
within 30 days of the date of this publication. Please refer to permit 
number PRT-814833 when submitting comments.
    Documents and other information submitted with this application are 
available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act 
and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the above office within 30 days 
of the date of publication of this notice.
Lynn B. Starnes,
Acting Regional Director, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
[FR Doc. 96-17392 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-55-P
Exhibit 23.1 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-72877, 333-91767, 333-30242, 333-41482, 333-59358, 333-100566, and333-107702) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113674 and 333-33794) of our reports dated March 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vignette Corporation, Vignette Corporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Vignette Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

March 14, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ARTHUR SUMERLIN, III,

Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-10459

 HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

BLAINE LAFLER, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

JUDGMENT

The above entitled matter having come before the Court on a Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus, Honorable George Caram Steeh, United States District Court Judge, presiding, and in

accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Certificate of 

Appealability is DENIED.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: s/Josephine Chaffee 

 DEPUTY COURT CLERK

Dated: June 6, 2011

2:09-cv-10459-GCS-CEB Doc # 12 Filed 06/06/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 1559
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Interwoven, Inc.: 

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-87186, 333-88725, 333-39914, 333-42690, 333-46662, 333-49926, and 333-54250) on Form S-8 of Interwoven, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated January 24, 2003except as to Note 11, which is as of February 19, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Interwoven, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensiveloss, stockholder’s equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002, annual report on Form 10-K ofInterwoven, Inc. 

 

Our report contains anexplanatory paragraph that refers to the Company’s adoption of Statement on Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” on January 1, 2002. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, California 

March 25, 2003