alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Douglas E. Ford, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sawadee Ventures,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of May, 2007.


/s/ Douglas E. Ford
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 10.54**

**AMENDMENT TO**

**EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

The Letter Agreement dated as of January 14, 2007 among AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Kindred Healthcare, Inc., PharMericaCorporation (formerly known as Safari Holding Corporation) (collectively, the “Company”) and Gregory S. Weishar, as amended on November 13, 2007 (the “Agreement”), is further amended, effective as of March 16, 2010, asfollows: 

1. The introductory language to Section 10(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby replaced and superseded in itsentirety as follows: 

“(i) As soon as reasonably practicable following the date that your employmenthereunder terminates (the “Termination Date”) (or, in the case of Clause (B), the date that the Annual Bonus for the year of termination is payable to other senior executives), a lump-sum cash payment in respect of each of thefollowing:” 

2. Section 10(g)(v) of the Agreement is hereby replaced and superseded in its entirety as follows:

“(v) “Pro-Rata Annual Bonus” shall mean: 

(A) for purposes of Section 10(c) of this Agreement, a cash amount determined by multiplying your annualized BaseSalary on the Termination Date times a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess of 365 over the number of days then remaining in the calendar year of termination, and the denominator of which is 365, and 

(B) for purposes of Section 10(a) of this Agreement, a cash amount equal to (1) the lesser of (x) yourannualized Base Salary on the Termination Date or (y) your “maximum award” earned under the Compensation Committee resolutions that establish the negative discretion approach under the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (or its successor)for the year of termination, determined based on actual performance during the entire year and without regard to any discretionary adjustments that have the effect of reducing the amount of such maximum award, multiplied by (2) a fraction, thenumerator of which is the excess of 365 over the number of days then remaining in the calendar year of termination, and the denominator of which is 365.” 

3. Except as explicitly set forth herein, the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-2 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3356
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-2 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3357
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/S/    MICHAEL J. CULOTTA                                          
|Michael J. Culotta                                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer April 30, 2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Trustees of the 

LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND - DETROIT & VICINITY; 

LABORERS VACATION & HOLIDAY TRUST FUND - DETROIT & VICINITY;

LABORERS METROPOLITAN DETROIT HEALTH & WELFARE FUND; 

LABORERS ANNUITY FUND - DETROIT & VICINITY; and the 

MICHIGAN LABORERS TRAINING FUND, trust funds established under, 

and administered pursuant to, federal law, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No. 09-10528

HON. ROBERT H. CLELAND

CELL-CRETE, INC., a domestic Michigan corporation, 

and ANTHONY V. LUPI, individually, and d/b/a CELL-CRETE, INC.

Defendants. 

_____________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE

Based upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Alternative Service, with Brief and Affidavit filed in

support thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Alternative Service is hereby Granted, and Plaintiffs shall be

permitted to obtain service on defendants Cell-Crete, Inc., and Anthony V. Lupi, individually and

d/b/a Cell-Crete, Inc., by (A) posting a copy of the Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Alternative

Service, Summons and Complaint on the front door of the (1) defendant’s registered office located

at 324 E. Shore, Whitmore Lake, Michigan 48189, and (2) defendant’s agent’s home address (as

2:09-cv-10528-RHC-VMM Doc # 5 Filed 04/08/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 25
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\09-10528.CELL-CRETE.Order.Granting.Motion.for.Alternate.Service.ljd.wpd

2

stated in the motion), and (B) by mailing a copy of said documents by regular mail to defendant at

the same two addresses.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 8, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date,

April 8, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-10528-RHC-VMM Doc # 5 Filed 04/08/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 26
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CHASE MANHATTAN MARINE OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH AGREEMENT

The undersigned certifies that he is an Executive Vice President of The CIT
Group/Sales Financing, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware
("CITSF"), and that as such he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this
certificate on behalf of CITSF in connection with Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1997 (the "Agreement"), among CITSF,
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
Sellers, and Chase Manhattan Marine Owner Trust 1997-A , for which Wilmington
Trust Company acts as Owner Trustee and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.
formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA acts as Indenture Trustee (all capitalized
terms used herein without definition having the respective meanings specified in
the Agreement). The undersigned further certifies to the Owner Trustee and to
the Indenture Trustee that a review of the activities of CITSF during the
preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such review,
CITSF has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement during the preceding
calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature this 10th day of
February, 2003.

                                             THE CIT GROUP/SALES
                                             FINANCING, INC., as Servicer

                                             /s/ William L. Schumm
                                             ------------------------
                                             Name:  William L. Schumm
                                             Title:   Executive Vice President
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-1952

___________________________

Vivek Shah

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Charles E. Samuels, Jr., D.S.C.C. Administrator, sued in his official capacity;

United States of America; Jose A. Santana, DSCC Administrator (originally

named as Doe)

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: August 13, 2015

Filed: August 18, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
In this interlocutory appeal in a pro se action under Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), federal inmate

Vivek Shah challenges the district court’s denials of preliminary injunctive relief. 1

After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying injunctive

relief, because Shah did not show a clear threat of irreparable harm. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(a)(1)(appellate jurisdiction); H&R Block Tax.Servs.LLC v.Acevedo-Lopez,

742 F.3d 1074, 1077 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Dataphase Sys., Inc. v.

C.L. Sys., Inc., 640 F.2d 109, 113 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc) (setting forth relevant

factors to be considered in determining whether preliminary injunction should issue). 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) on the Form 10-Q of Siga Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the nine months ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edwin Morrow, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: June 20, 2011   /s/ EDWIN MORROW Edwin Morrow Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Phillip WEBSTER, Appellant. Phillip WEBSTER, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60779, 63416.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 1, 1994.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Phillip Webster, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, for robbery in the second degree. Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to imprisonment for twenty years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed defendant’s direct appeal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Lisa Menne SGROI, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Norman MENNE, Defendant/Respondent, and Veronica Ponciroli, Defendant.

No. 65786.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Douglas A. Forsyth, Anderson & Preuss, Clayton, for appellant.

Herbert K. Hoffman, Clayton, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a petition in two counts. Count I named both defendants and Count II named only the non-appealing defendant. The trial court dismissed Count I. Plaintiff appeals from this order. Count II of plaintiffs petition remains pending. The trial court did not expressly designate its action as final according to Rule 74.01(b).

This court has a duty to raise the issue of appellate jurisdiction *sua sponte*even if neither party has raised it. *Haugland v. Parsons,*827 S.W.2d 285, 286 (Mo.App.1992). An appellate court has jurisdiction only over final judgments. *Id.*An order of the trial court is final only when it disposes of all issues for all parties in the case and leaves nothing for future determination. *Id.*If the trial court does not resolve all issues for all parties or expressly designate the court’s action as final according to Rule 74.01(b), the appeal must be dismissed. *Id.*

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                 RELIANT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
           (A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF RELIANT ENERGY, INCORPORATED)

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                       ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         2001         2000         1999         1998         1997
                                                       --------     --------     --------     --------     --------
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>

Income from continuing operations ................     $ 67,244     $ 98,228     $103,871     $ 93,824     $ 66,722

Income taxes for continuing operations ...........       58,287       93,272       88,781      111,830       55,781
                                                       --------     --------     --------     --------     --------

                                                        125,531      191,500      192,652      205,654      122,503
                                                       --------     --------     --------     --------     --------

Fixed charges, as defined:

   Interest expense ..............................      154,965      142,861      119,500      111,337      126,150

   Distribution on trust preferred securities ....           28           29          357          632        6,596

   Interest component of rentals charged to
     operating expense ...........................       10,739       10,934       10,975        8,485        7,988
                                                       --------     --------     --------     --------     --------

   Total fixed charges ...........................      165,732      153,824      130,832      120,454      140,734
                                                       --------     --------     --------     --------     --------

Earnings, as defined .............................     $291,263     $345,324     $323,484     $326,108     $263,237
                                                       ========     ========     ========     ========     ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...............         1.76         2.24         2.47         2.71         1.87
                                                       ========     ========     ========     ========     ========
</Table>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 148 (Thursday, July 31, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44797-44798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-17547]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i> 11308]


Illinois Disaster Number IL-00016

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Illinois 
(FEMA-1771-DR), dated 06/24/2008.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 06/01/2008 and continuing.

[[Page 44798]]

    Effective Date: 07/16/2008.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 08/25/2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Illinois, dated 06/24/2008, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties:
    Lake, Madison, Monroe, Randolph, Saint Clair.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E8-17547 Filed 7-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case No. 2:18-CR-422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM NAME AND ADDRESS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jonathan Baum (CA State Bar No. 303469)

BOERSCH & ILLOVSKY LLP

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 806

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel: (415) 500-6640

jonathan@boersch-illovsky.com

Attorney for Movant Carl Ferrer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:18-CR-422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM 

NAME AND ADDRESS

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1400 Filed 11/22/21 Page 1 of 3
i Case No. 2:18-CR-422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM NAME AND ADDRESS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

To the CLERK OF COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: 

Pursuant to LRCivP 83.3(d), notice is hereby given that the firm name, address, 

and contact information (including email) for Jonathan Baum as attorney for Movant

Carl Ferrer in the above-captioned case has changed. The new firm information is:

Jonathan Baum 

BOERSCH & ILLOVSKY LLP

1611 Telegraph Ave., Suite 806

Oakland, CA 94612

Tel: (415) 500-6640

jonathan@boersch-illovsky.com

Dated: Nov. 22, 2021 Respectfully submitted,

BOERSCH & ILLOVSKY LLP

By /s/ Jonathan Baum

Jonathan Baum

Attorney for Movant Carl Ferrer

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1400 Filed 11/22/21 Page 2 of 3
2 Case No. 2:18-CR-422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM NAME AND ADDRESS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on this day of Nov. 22, 2021, I electronically transmitted a PDF 

version of this document to the Clerk of Court, using the CM/ECF System, for filing and 

for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys of record.

/s/ Jonathan Baum

Jonathan Baum

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1400 Filed 11/22/21 Page 3 of 3