alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN&tw1e41lzaef theRoriacdci+il statutespPom da.es tbtit F!mnw~ aaq Bdamr shall:bemtitrad te rplg amp or smm of Dsney not slra, eorporntioIl, a4Qdnistrutor*

sxwutor, trustw, arising:outor rqy luplidutell UxMl mlaontestea efoig,suchaustcai8ndthcnmdsmtaypQ;oswewerte ale couoty Clerk Of the ocunw l.la rhieb said llduor

resiaos for the acocunt~ ot wld SgluJr,

ala the reooiptOS theco~ty clerkthemfor ehallbcfa*ererldnahgon~ Wnor as ot the dot0 aad tathe extentai the

OS alq pelwonuho wy hute the oustoay Of Cbe WSJXW mpjmokeepplleatioato the.CoimtyJrH&e and exemte ogre-'
u&d fual frOm the Cormfo **ClWk** to be creed **for** t&e 

### baaatif perboaatobee~wodbytbe~yJubge,aodcm~
of the F&MC, amt npcn the fuuhb beI wbsustcd the purty uho recaived themcnsy may mike a fnabytsorumofthecountycon if- bzes~&%: tber llab~lityon Ma benIl.

Art%ele1994 of tbeRsriee88tatutes~ paeswlim 1893,ie~ortoliFt.4zrilto,rab.ssiC~.~M t&at ubwe B aqnor,

### uitlmutu ggumibn, rocww8 a car leas than $500.00,Us next friend1 oc s4me otherperblnapprovalbyfha 

### juagelnwboeewurttJlesldgasntuw 3vbtOSDBd,

6q reeedve the mcney fro61 

### the c\lerk

of ttm court bgexi30utingaboxmlindcublethewcuntof~~tr 

### 00nd.tticmea

08 pw%dea by LUUJ und wham the amom& o? the reowewy for the sdnor b sme than $600.00,the trl.ul Wge may order its f.nvestmmtin any swam that be, Uie trbl luago,nioy

-et*

## 141
#### Darryl MERRITT, Appellant, v. Paul K. DELO, Respondent.

No. 63490.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Sept. 7, 1993.

Darryl Merritt, pro se.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stewart Freilich, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and REINHARD and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Darryl Merritt, appeals from a denial of a writ of replevin in the Circuit Court of Washington County, in which appellant sought to compel respondent, Paul K. Delo, superintendent of the Potosí Correctional Center, to return certain property of the inmate. We affirm.

The order of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our holding.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1714]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5406-8]


Regulatory Reinvention (XL) Pilot Projects: XL Community Pilot 
Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 12, 1995 the Environmental Protection Agency published 
the Federal Register Notice 60 FR 63711 (FRL-5344-5) in error. Please 
refer to the November 1, 1995 Federal Register Notice 60 FR 55569 (FRL-
5322-9) for the correct and complete description of the XL Community 
(XLC) Pilot Program. Additional information on the XL Community Pilot 
Program may be obtained by calling 703-934-3241. To request that XLC 
documents be sent or faxed please call the XL program's automated 
telephone system at 202-260-8590.

    Dated: January 19, 1996.
John Wilson,
OPPE/OSEC.
[FR Doc. 96-1714 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 10.16

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1
 TO THE
 CONSULTING AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2011 (the “Agreement”), is made and entered into as of September 1, 2011 (the “Execution Date”), by and between Cyrenaic Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Remy Luthringer, an individual (“Consultant”).  Company and Consultant are each referred to individually as a “Party” and together as the “Parties”.

 

RECITALS:

 

WHEREAS, the Parties are the parties to the Agreement; and

 

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend the Agreement subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree and affirm that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.                                      The words “36 hours” in the last sentence of Section 1 of the Agreement shall be amended to “40 hours”.

 

2.                                      The words “$11,250 per month” in the first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Agreement shall be amended to “$14,100 per month”.

 

3.                                      No Other Amendments.  Except as expressly provided herein, the Agreement remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

 

4.                                      Headings and Captions.  The headings and captions used in this Amendment are for convenience and reference purposes only and shall not be considered a part of or effect the construction or interpretation of any provision of this Amendment.

 

5.                                      Counterparts; Effectiveness.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  This Amendment shall become effective when each Party hereto shall have received a counterpart hereof signed by the other Parties hereto.

 

6.                                      Severability.  If any provision of the Amendment is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless be given full force and effect.

 

7.                                      Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

 











 

[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting Agreement]

 

2











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have each caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Execution Date.

 

 

	
Company:
    	
CYRENAIC   PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Lorenzo Pellegrini
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Lorenzo Pellegrini
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Director & Secretary
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Consultant
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
/s/ Remy Luthringer
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Remy Luthringer
    	
 
    
					


 

[Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting Agreement]

 

3
AO 85 (Rev. 8/97) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

(For Use In Civil Cases With District Judge as Presider)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

_______________________________ District of __________________________________________________

NOTICE, CONSENT, AND ORDER OF REFERENCEPlaintiff EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

 v.

 Case Number:

Defendant

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P.73, you are hereby notified that a United States magistrate

judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order the entry

of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent.

You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent the court’s jurisdiction from

being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent will

not be communicated to any magistrate judge or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United States court of appeals for this

judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case hereby voluntarily consent to

have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial, order the entry of a final

judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings.

Signatures Party Represented Date

_____________________________________ __________________________________ ____________________

_____________________________________ __________________________________ ____________________

_____________________________________ __________________________________ ____________________

_____________________________________ __________________________________ ____________________

ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be assigned to ______________________________________________________

United States Magistrate Judge, for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.

73 and the foregoing consent of the parties. All further documents filed with the court are to carry the following case number

________________________________________.

________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

 Date United States District Judge

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON THIS

FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 2:18-cv-00467-GMS Document 4 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-101407 and 333-102593 on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-35751, 333-88635, 333-43834, 333-70952 and 333-96963 on Form S-8 of Dot Hill Systems
Corp., of our reports dated March 17, 2003 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Dot Hill Systems Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Diego, California
April 25, 2003

---
EXHIBIT 12


                             ANNUAL CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



    Pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section  1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of EDAP TMS S.A. (the "Company"), does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:

    The Annual Report on Form  20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the
Company fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information  contained  in  the  Form  20-F
fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 8, 2003                    /S/ PHILIPPE CHAUVEAU
                                      Philippe Chauveau
                                      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: May 8, 2003                    /S/ IAN VAWTER
                                      Ian Vawter
                                      Chief Financial Officer

     A Signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been  provided to EDAP TMS S.A.  and will be retained by
EDAP TMS S.A. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
(d) Except as specifically amended hereby, all of the terms and provisions of the LoanAgreement and the other Loan Documents shall remain in full force and effect and are herebyratified and confirmed.(e) This Amendment shall be deemed to be a Loan Document for all purposes.(f) This Amendment is subject to Section 8.4 of the Loan Agreement.**SECTION 3.****Execution in Counterparts****.**This Amendment may be executed incounterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original, andall of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment may beexecuted and delivered by telecopier or other electronic means with the same force and effect as ifthe same was a fully executed and delivered original manual counterpart.[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
 
2

 
         PGRT ESH, INC.           By: [s] David Lichtenstein             David Lichtenstein
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Healy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.

Date: May 6, 2010



By:

/s/ Michael E. HealyName:

Michael E. HealyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenced into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made on or before or after the date of this Report), irrespective at any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Raphael DONNELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 49760.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 14, 1995.

Rosemary E. Percival, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

*904Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from dismissal for untimely filing of Rule 24.035 postconviction motion. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

          I, Robert B. Harris, Ph.D., certify that:

          1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc.;

          2.          Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

          3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

          4.          The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

                       (a)          designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report isbeing prepared;

                       (b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

                       (c)          presented in thisquarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

          1.          The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                       (a)          all significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products,
Inc, (the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yuehua
Xia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  May
      15, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ Yuehua XiaYuehua
      XiaChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL

For the Fifth Circuit

 

No. 98-30112

 

WILLIAM T. POE; WILLIAM T POE & ASSOCIATES,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

BUREAU OF DIPLOMATIC SECURITY, a unit of the 

Department of State,

 Defendants,

BUREAU OF DIPLOMATIC SECURITY, a unit of the Department of State;

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States;

DAVID BOWYER; THOMAS WASCOM; CAP FRANK, Dr.; SONZA & COMPANY,

LTD; BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO & FIREARMS, a unit of the

Department of the Treasury; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(94-CV-562)

 

December 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of iLinc Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"). I, James M.
Powers, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company in respect to those items required
                  to be described or presented in such Report under Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


By: /s/ James M. Powers, Jr.
------------------------------------
James M. Powers, Jr.,
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
June 28, 2004
2:09-cv-11457-NGE-RSW Doc # 34-18 Filed 05/06/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 362
2:09-cv-11457-NGE-RSW Doc # 34-18 Filed 05/06/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 363
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  1350
                 (Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Q of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc.
(the"Company")  for  the  quarterly period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr.
Roger  Crystal,  as  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


Date:  12/21/09                           By:  /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Dr.  Roger  Crystal
                                             Chief  Executive  Officer

This  certification  accompanies  each  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 and shalL not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

                                       14
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the annual report of CPC of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rod A. Shipman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and








(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 15, 2011
/s/ Rod A. ShipmanRod A. ShipmanChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)