alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                      CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that he is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan RV Owner Trust 1997-A and that he is duly authorized
to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in connection
with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of September 1,
1997 (the "Indenture") and the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1997 (the "Agreement"), among CITSF, as Servicer, Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, National Association and Chase Manhattan Bank, as Sellers, and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee. All capitalized terms used herein
without definition shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture
and the Agreement.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under his supervision
and, to the best of his knowledge, the Issuer has fulfilled its obligations
under the Indenture for the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 29
day of March, 2001.

                                CHASE MANHATTAN  RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                                BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                individual capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee

                                /s/ Denise M. Geran
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Name: Denise M. Geran
                                Title: Financial Services Officers

The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc., as Servicer, hereby requests that
Wilmington Trust Company execute the above Issuer's Certificate and deliver it
to Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota National Association, as Indenture Trustee.

                                THE CIT GROUP/SALES FINANCING, INC., as
                                Servicer

                                /s/ Frank Garcia
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Name:  Frank Garcia
                                Title: Senior Vice President
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-1720

___________________________ Pamela Jeanette Smith lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. The Curators of the University of Missouri lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Jefferson City

____________ Submitted: February 27, 2020 Filed: March 3, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Pamela Smith appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’

1 The Honorable Willie J. Epps, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).arguments on appeal, we conclude that summary judgment was proper. See

Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 829 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

DASSAULT SYSTÉMES, S.A., 

 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 09-cv-10534 

 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman 

v. 

KEITH CHILDRESS, 

d/b/a PRACTICAL CATIA, 

 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

ORDER ON DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A.s’ 

MOTION TO PERMIT ELECTRONICDEVICES IN COURTHOUSE 

__________________________________________________________________

The Court has scheduled a Jury Trial for March 13, 2024. The following 

people are allowed to bring the following equipment into the building: 

1. Rodolphe Pantanacce, Corporate Representative, Plaintiff Dassault 

a. Devices: Laptop 

2. Andrew Clarkson: Compliance Manager, Plaintiff Dassault 

a. Devices: Cellular Phone 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Matthew F. Leitman 

 MATTHEW F. LEITMAN 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: March 12, 2024 

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 654, PageID.24808 Filed 03/12/24 Page 1 of 2
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties 

and/or counsel of record on March 12, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary 

mail. 

 s/Holly A. Ryan 

 Case Manager 

 (313) 234-5126

Case 2:09-cv-10534-MFL-MJH ECF No. 654, PageID.24809 Filed 03/12/24 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

FREDERICK E. BLACK,

Petitioner, Case No. 09-cr-20093

Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

v. Mag. R. Steven Whalen

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING DEFENDANT’S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on December 7, 2010 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

 Chief Judge, United States District Court

On November 16, 2010, Magistrate Judge Paul Komives issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court dismiss without prejudice as

premature Defendant Frederick Black’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his

sentence and deny a certificate of appealability. Defendant did not file any objections to

the R & R. The Magistrate Judge based his R & R on the Sixth Circuit rule requiring

extraordinary circumstances for the district court to consider a § 2255 motion during the

pendency of a Defendant’s direct appeal with the circuit court. Capaldi v. Pontesso, 135

F.3d 1122, 1124 (6th Cir. 1998). Defendant filed a notice of appeal with the Sixth Circuit

on April 30, 2010, and his appeal remains pending in that court, docketed as Case No. 10-
1601.

Having reviewed the R & R, as well as the parties’ submissions in support of and

opposition to Petitioner’s underlying § 2255 motion, the accompanying exhibits, and the

record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the Magistrate Judge’s analysis, and finds no

extraordinary circumstances exist to grant Defendant’s motion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s

November 16, 2010 Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 67] is hereby ADOPTED by the

Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to vacate sentence under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 [Dkt. # 60] is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: December 7, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

December 7, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Ruth A.Gunther 

Case Manager

(313) 234-5137
neau_ex103.htm


EXHIBIT 10.3


 





 




  





1











  






 


 





 




  





2











  






 


 





 




  





3











  






 


 





 




  





4











  






 






 




  





5











  






 


 





 




  





6











  






 


 





 




  





7











  






 


 




 


8
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3866

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for certain

health maintenance organizations.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 22, 1996

Mr. TOWNS (for himself, Mr. GREENWOOD, and Mr. FRANKS of Connecticut)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Commerce

A BILL

To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition

rule for certain health maintenance organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT

4 RULE FOR CERTAIN MANAGED CARE ORGANI5 ZATIONS.

6 The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the

7 Social Security Act is waived with respect to Catholic

8 Health Services Plan of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. (doing

9 business as Fidelis Health Plan), Managed Healthcare

10 Systems of New York, Inc., and Health Partners of Phila-
2

•HR 3866 IH

1 delphia, Inc., for contract periods through December 31,

2 1999.

Æ
Opinion issued February 13, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00092-CV

———————————

IN RE TAKASHA FRANCIS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, TaKasha Francis, filed a petition for writ of mandamus related to the 

underlying trial court case, filed by real party in interest, the Honorable Robert K. 

Schaffer, against real parties in interest, Mike Doyle, in his representative capacity 

as the Chair of the Harris County Democratic Party, and the Harris County 

Democratic Party.1

1 The underlying case is Robert K. Schaffer v. Mike Doyle, in his Representative 

Capacity as Chair of the Harris County Democratic Party, and the Harris County 
2

In connection with her mandamus petition, Francis also filed an “Emergency 

Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay.” In her motion, Francis requested that the 

Court “stay[] the [February 8, 2024] trial setting so” the merits of her mandamus 

petition “may be considered” by this Court. However, on February 6, 2024, Francis 

filed an “Update on Relator’s Request for Emergency Stay,” notifying the Court of 

a February 5, 2024 trial court hearing in which the trial court granted Francis’s 

request for emergency continuance of the February 8, 2024 trial setting. 

Accordingly, Francis stated that she was “withdraw[ing] her request for an 

Emergency Stay of the February 8, 2024 trial setting.” 

Our review of Francis’s mandamus petition reflects that she has failed to 

establish that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 

833, 840 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny Francis’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We further deny as moot Francis’s 

“Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay,” and dismiss any other pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.

Democratic Party, Case No. 2024-02303, in the 269th District Court of Harris 

County, Texas, the Honorable Christi Kennedy, sitting by assignment, presiding.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3933

To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air and

Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International Airport, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 1996

Mr. WOLF (for himself, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

DAVIS, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. MORAN, Mr. PAYNE of Virginia, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. PICKETT, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. BATEMAN, and Mr.

SCOTT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International Airport, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF MUSEUM CENTER.

4 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution

5 is authorized to construct the Smithsonian Institution Na6 tional Air and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washing7 ton Dulles International Airport.
2

•HR 3933 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

2 No appropriated funds may be used to pay any ex3 pense of the construction authorized by section 1.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         341,348
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   55,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                  1,469,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             1,890,345
<PP&E>                                                       1,731,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 739,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               3,232,008
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        5,062,439
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         8,606
<OTHER-SE>                                                  20,913,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 3,232,008
<SALES>                                                      2,501,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             2,501,208
<CGS>                                                        2,415,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                5,917,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          10,038,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (13,386,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (13,386,399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (13,386,399)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (2.850)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34450-34451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16875]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-440-OLA-3]


In the Matter of: The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company 
(Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1) Notice of Appointment of 
Adjudicatory Employees

    Pursuant to 10 CFR Sec. 2.4, notice is hereby given that Mr. 
Charles Serpan, a Commission employee in the Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research, and Mr.

[[Page 34451]]

Allen Hansen, a Commission employee in the Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation, have been appointed as Commission adjudicatory employees 
within the meaning of section 2.4, to advise the Commission on issues 
related to the pending appeal of LBP-95-17, 42 NRC 137 (1995). Messrs. 
Serpan and Hansen have not previously performed any investigative or 
litigating function connected with this or any factually-related 
proceeding.
    Until such time as a final decision is issued in this matter, 
parties to the proceeding shall not communicate with Messrs. Serpan or 
Hansen with regard to the merits of this case.
    It is so ordered.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 26th day of June, 1996.

    For the Commission.
John C. Hoyle,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-16875 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGE F-3 AND F-4 OF THE COMPANY'S 10KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      459
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (37)
<INVENTORY>                                         57
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    80
<PP&E>                                              80
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (54)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3070
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1647
<BONDS>                                           5150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3730)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3070
<SALES>                                           2707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6901
<CGS>                                             2333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     80
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 80
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        80
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
Exhibit 6

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1990-6 Filed 11/27/23 Page 1 of 3
U.S. Department of Justice

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

Paul J. Cambria Jr.

Attorney at Law

Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria,

LLC

42 Delaware Ave, Suite 120 

Buffalo, NY 14202 

(attorney for Michael Lacey)

Jim Grant 

Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

920 Fifth Avenue,

Suite 3300

Seattle, WA 98104

(attorney for Lacey and Larkin)

Robert Corn-Revere

Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

1919 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., 

Suite 800

Washington, DC 20006

(attorney for Lacey and Larkin)

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr., Esq.

Bienert, Miller & Katzman, 

PLC

903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350

San Clemente, CA 92673

(attorney for James Larkin)

Michael D. Kimerer, Esq.

1313 E. Osborn Road, 

Suite 100

Phoenix, AZ 85014

(attorney for Jed Brunst)

Bruce Feder, Esq.

2930 East Camelback Road, 

Suite 160

Phoenix, AZ 85016

(attorney for Scott Spear)

David S. Eisenberg, Esq.

3550 N. Central Ave., 

Suite 1155

Phoenix, AZ 85012

(attorney for Andrew Padilla)

Joy Malby Bertrand, Esq.

1826 N. 7th Avenue

Phoenix, AZ, 85007

(attorney for Joye Vaught)

Gary Lincenberg, Esq.

Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, 

Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, 

P.C.

1875 Century Park East

23rd Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

(attorney for Jed Brunst)

Re: U.S. v. Michael Lacey, et.al.

CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

Dear Counsel:

In an effort to assist you in easily locating specific financial records previously produced, the 

government has re-Bates these records and enclosed a disk that contains an index with the production 

BEGDOC and ENDDOC DOJ-BP Bates number, file name, and file path for each record.

1

 1 A thumb drive containing the re-produced financial records and a disk containing an index for this re-production 

for defendants Michael Lacey, James Larkin, and Jed Brunst are being provided to Paul Cambria Jr., Thomas H. 

Bienert Jr., and Gary Lincenberg respectively.

Two Renaissance Square Main: (602) 514-7500

40 N. Central Ave., Suite 1800 Main Fax: (602) 514-7693

Phoenix, AZ 85004-4408

January 13, 2020

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1990-6 Filed 11/27/23 Page 2 of 3
Lacey, et. al. Letter

January 13, 2020

Page 2

In the coming weeks, in an effort to further assist Defendants in preparing for trial, the 

government will provide you with a list identifying the specific financial records that relate to the 

money laundering charges in Counts 53-100 of the Superseding Indictment.

The thumb drive contains the following Bates Stamped records:

• Re-Bates Previously Produced Financial Records – DOJ-BP-0004902872-DOJ-BP0005068773

Please reach out with any questions.

Sincerely,

BRIAN BENCZKOWSKI

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division 

U.S. Department of Justice

s/Reginald E. Jones

REGINALD E. JONES 

Senior Trial Attorney, CEOS

(202) 616-2807 

reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

MICHAEL BAILEY

U.S. Attorney 

KEVIN M. RAPP

MARGARET PERLMETER 

PETER S. KOZINETS 

ANDREW STONE

JOHN J. KUCERA 

Assistant United States Attorneys

Enclosures

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1990-6 Filed 11/27/23 Page 3 of 3
#### James WALKER, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 64139.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 8, 1994.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant, appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff, respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons *922for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
neau_ex104.htm


EXHIBIT 10.4


 





 




  





1











  






 


 





 




  





2











  






 


 





 




  





3











  






 


 





 




  





4











  






 






 




  





5











  






 


 





 




  





6











  






 


 





 




  





7











  






 


 




 


8
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sharon M. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

By:   */s/ Sharon M. Lynch*

       Sharon M. Lynch

       Chief Executive Officer

       Chief Accounting Officer

 

Dated: August 4, 2008
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 14

Dockets.Justia.com