alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Adil Shafi,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:09−cv−10454−VAR−VMM

Hon. Victoria A Roberts

Braintech, Incorporated,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT

 Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court

reporter/transcriber in the above−captioned matter. The parties have twenty−one (21) calendar

days from the filing of the transcript to file with the court and court reporter/transcriber a

Redaction Request of this transcript. If no such request is filed, the transcript may be made

remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.

 Any party needing a copy of the transcript to review for redaction purposes may purchase a

copy from the court reporter/transcriber or view the document at the Clerk's Office public

terminal.

s/ M Metcalf 

Certification

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

s/ M Metcalf 

Dated: February 14, 2011

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 87 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jeffery E. Jones,  Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 06, 2008



                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                Secretary/Treasurer
#### Barbra PIOTROWSKI et al., Petitioners, v. Richard L. MINNS, Respondent.

No. 95-0749.

Supreme Court of Texas.

March 7, 1996.

Rehearing Overruled April 12, 1996.

George P. Hardy, Houston, Matt Dawson, Corsicana, Patrice M. Barron, Houston, Dan Morales, John P. Giberson, Austin, for Petitioners.

Bruce Bennett, Austin, William W. Kilgar-lin, Santa Fe, NM, George M. Bishop, Houston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

We deny petitioner’s application for writ of error. The Court neither approves nor disapproves of the court of appeals’ discussion of the death penalty sanction. 904 S.W.2d 161.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-91570 and No. 333-61874) and theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-100843, No. 333-83506, No. 333-60156, No. 333-49032, 333-42844, 333-34502 and No. 333-110743) of Chordiant Software, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2004 relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose,California 

March 3, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Annual Report of Myriad Entertainment and Resorts, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Lopardo, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: March 31, 2008

| |                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Nicholas Lopardo                                            
| | Nicholas Lopardo                                                
| | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3867

AN ACT

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistand for other purposes. ance and Bill of Rights Act to extend the Act,
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3867

AN ACT

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill

of Rights Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 3867 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developmental Disabil3 ities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of

4 1996’’.

5 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

6 Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist7 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended

8 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

10 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

11 PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL

12 RIGHTS.

13 Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist14 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended

15 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

16 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

17 SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

18 UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

19 Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As20 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is

21 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

22 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

23 SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

24 PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

25 Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As26 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is
3

•HR 3867 EH

1 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 1996.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
8



[2/t5°2008 16:86 Pax teasifayias MPAS.

From: "Roxanne Fisher” <q j

‘oF Rick FeldmanTM
ate: 4d 14/14/2007 3:56:42 PM i
ubject; RE: Micah Fialka-Feldman :

INo,- there fis nothing else he needs to do. He Is all set,

Just before we leave on our Christmas Break we will be sending out

the .
Assignment Letters to all Winter students who will be moving in. This

letter will tell him when and where to pick up his Residence Hail key.
it

will also inform him of what he can and cannot bring for His living
arrangements. The letter will NOT give you his room Hanment nor

will it
give you his roommate information. He will not learn that information

until .
he comes to pick up his key (when he moves in),

Mark January 6, 2008, on your calendar. That is move In'day. Ido not

have .
the time yet. He can have, if he wants, a microwave 60g watts

(maximum 800
watts), refrigerator 5 cubic feet {basically waiste high), twin extra-long

sheets, a lap top or desk top computer (we have wireless internet),

and TV.
_ dust give you Christmas ideas, but this will all be In the information

Assignment Letter. But he does not have to get any of those things if

he
does not want to.

You can also look on line at www.oakland.edu/housing and get more
infarmation if you like. :

We look forward to having Micah with us. | personally met with him

and he
is just a wonderful man,

OAK000077



FAX L2as47oa1ay MPAS , Goss

Hope this helps, 3

Roxanne Fisher .
Oakland University Housing Dept i
RESIDENCE MALLS i
448 Hamlin Hall

Rochester, MI_ 49309

6:00 AM - 5:00 PM Monday-Friday

248-370-3570 Phone

248-370-3340 Fax

——Original Message—.
From: Riek Feldman [mailto

Sent: Wednesday, November 4 4, 2007 2:38 pH
Tot rfisher@oaktand.edu

Subject: Fwd: Micah Fialka-Feldman

>>> Rick Feldman 44/44/07 10:50 AM >>>
Hello Roxanne,

This is Micah's dad. Uknwo that you met with Micah and Kim (MORC)
recently. | have been In touch with Bob Wiggens and recently Spoke
with

Lionetie.

{just Wanted to say hello and please let me know if there is anything

else
We need ta ddo so Micah is available for January dormitpry living,

thanks,
tich

OAKO000078
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Docket C-3378]


Mannesmann, A.G.; Prohibited Trade Practices and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Set aside order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order reopens a 1992 consent order--which required 
Mannesmann to divest the Buschman Co. and to obtain, for 10 years, 
Commission approval prior to acquiring any business that manufactures 
and sells certain conveyor systems--and sets aside the consent order 
pursuant to the Commission's Prior Approval Policy Statement. The order 
cites the availability of the premerger notification and waiting period 
requirements, and noted that under the Policy Statement, the Commission 
presumes that the public interest requires setting aside the prior 
approval requirement in Paragraph V of the order.

DATES: Consent Order issued March 24, 1992. Set aside order issued 
October 11, 1995.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Consent Order and Set Aside Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann Malester, FTC/S-2308, Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326-2682.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Matter of Mannesmann, A.G. The 
prohibited trade practices and/or corrective actions are removed as 
indicated.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16481 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX 

U.S. District Judge: Steven P. Logan Date: November 16, 2018 

USA v. Lacey et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Peter Kozinets, Kevin Rapp and John Kucera 

Defendant-1: Michael Lacey 

Attorneys for Defendant: James Grant and Paul Cambria, retained 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-2: James Larkin 

Attorneys for Defendant: James Grant, Whitney Bernstein, Thomas Bienert, Jr. (telephonically) 

and Seetha Ramachandran (telephonically), retained

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-3: Scott Spear 

Attorney for Defendant: Bruce Feder, retained 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-4: John Brunst 

Attorneys for Defendant: Ariel Neuman and Michael Kimerer, retained 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-6: Andrew Padilla 

Attorney for Defendant: Michael Piccarreta, retained 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 393 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 2
USA v. Lacey et al Date: November 16, 2018 

Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL Page 2 of 2

Page 2 of 2 

Defendant-7: Joye Vaught 

Attorney for Defendant: Stephen Weiss, retained 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Attorney for Movants: Anne Chapman, retained

HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS: 

Defendant Padilla and Vaught’s Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 360) and 

Movants’ Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 365) are argued to the Court. 

Recess taken. 

Defendant Lacey and Larkin’s Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 376) is argued to the 

Court. 

For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant Padilla and Vaught’s Emergency Motion to Stay 

Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 360) is denied. The temporary stay (Doc. 361) is lifted. The 

government may move forward with the execution of the seizure warrants at issue. 

For the reasons stated on the record, Movants’ Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees 

(Doc. 365) is denied. The temporary stay (Doc. 369) is lifted. The government may move forward 

with the execution of the seizure warrants at issue. 

For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant Lacey and Larkin’s Motion to Stay Seizure of 

Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 376) is denied. The temporary stay (Doc. 384) is lifted. The government may 

move forward with the execution of the seizure warrants at issue. 

Counsel for Defendant Padilla’s oral motion to stay these orders for a period of seven days is denied. 

Court Reporter Elva Cruz-Lauer 

Deputy Clerk Lisa Richter 

Start: 9:05 AM 

Stop: 10:53 AM 

 Total court time: 1 hour, 34 minutes 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 393 Filed 11/16/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-102593, 333-104958 and 333-107756 on
Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-35751, 333-88635, 333-43834, 333-70952, 333-96963 and 333-107008
on Form S-8 of Dot Hill Systems Corp. of our reports dated March 4, 2004 appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dot Hill Systems Corp. for the
year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Diego, California
March 15, 2004

---

QuickLinks
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of S.F., a child, * From the 326th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 7697

- CX

.

No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 0 9 6

- CV * September 30, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Adil Shafi,

Counter-Plaintiff,

Case No: 09-10454

vs Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

Magistrate Judge Michelson

Braintech and Frederick Weidinger,

Counter-Defendant.

________________________________/

SCHEDULING ORDER (PHASE II)

PLEASE DOCKET IMMEDIATELY:

NO FURTHER NOTICE OF THESE DATES WILL BE SENT

1. Setting Date for filing of Final Pretrial Order;

2. Setting date of Final Pretrial Conference;

3. Setting Trial date;

4. Providing for content of Final Pretrial Order and describing

material to be prepared and to be made available to the 

Court and counsel; and

5. Setting forth brief format requirements.

1. Deadline for filing Joint Pretrial Order: 4/30/13 .

2. *Deadline for filing all other Motions in Limine: 4/30/13 .

3. *Deadline for filing Responses to Motions in Limine: 5/7/13 . 

4. Final Pretrial Conference Date and Time: 5/14/13 at 10:00 am .

Trial counsel must be present at the Final Pretrial Conference.

5. Hearing on Motions in Limine: 5/14/13 at 10:00 am .

6. Trial date and time: 5/21/13 through 5/23/13 at 9:00 am .

Jury Trial X 

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 147 Filed 03/27/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3188
2

Non Jury Trial 

PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:

1. The parties may not stipulate to extend any dates.

2. Briefing Schedule: Unless specifically addressed in this Order, the local court rules

apply for filing responses and replies to motions.

3. All briefs must comply strictly with LR 7.1 (Statement of Issues, Statement of

Controlling/Most Appropriate Authority), and, in addition, must contain a Table of

Contents, an Index of Authorities and an Index of Exhibits. The Exhibits must be tabbed.

Unpublished cases should be attached. Counsel are to highlight relevant portions of

exhibits to which the Court’s attention should be directed. Furthermore, the format

requirements as set forth in LR 5.1 must be strictly adhered to. A courtesy copy of all

motions and briefs must be submitted directly to Judge Roberts’ chambers.

4. Motion hearings: Pursuant to L.R. 7.1(e)(2), the Court will decide motions on the briefs

filed, UNLESS the Court issues a Notice of Motion Hearing.

5. Bench trials: Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law are to be submitted on the first

day of trial.

* Motions in Limine can be filed in Bench Trials only with leave of court.

THE ABOVE CONSTITUTES AN ORDER OF THIS COURT.

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Dated: 3/27/13 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

(Revised: 12/10)

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 147 Filed 03/27/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3189
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,505-01

IN RE ANTHONY LEROY PIERCE, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 267685 IN THE 208 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

The Court abated Relator’s motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus for a response from

the District Clerk. Relator alleged that he filed four motions relating to his conviction in the 208th

District Court of Harris County, and that the District Clerk did not filed the motions. 

Based on the Harris County District Clerk’s response, we deny leave to file the writ of

mandamus against the District Clerk. Leave to file is denied as to any claims against the 208th

District Court under Padilla v. McDaniel.

1

Filed: October 14, 2015

Do not publish

 122 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). 1
<PAGE>

                        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                OF THE
                       CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                   OF
                      QUICKTURN DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.

     Quickturn Design Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), pursuant to the
provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"DGCL"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

     FIRST: The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
amended by deleting the first paragraph of the Article numbered "Fourth" in
its present form and substituting therefor a new first paragraph of the
Article numbered "Fourth" in the following form:

     "This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares to be
designated respectively Preferred Stock ("Preferred") and Common Stock
("Common"). The total number of shares of Preferred this corporation shall
have authority to issue shall be 2,000,000, $.001 par value, and the total
number of shares of Common which this corporation shall have the authority
to issue shall be 40,000,000, $.001 par value."

     SECOND: The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation set forth in this Certificate of Amendment has been duly adopted
in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the DGCL by (a) the Board
of Directors of the Corporation having duly adopted a resolution setting
forth such amendment and declaring its advisability and submitting it to the
stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and (b) the stockholders
of the Corporation having duly adopted such amendment by vote of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote thereon at an annual
meeting of stockholders called and held upon notice in accordance with
Section 222 of the DGCL.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused its corporate seal to be
hereunto affixed and this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by Keith R.
Lobo, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and attested by Raymond K.
Ostby, its Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary, this 11th day of April 1997.

                                      QUICKTURN DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.

                                      By: /s/ Keith R. Lobo
                                          -----------------------
                                          Keith R. Lobo
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

/s/ Raymond K. Ostby
-------------------------
Raymond K. Ostby
Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CORPORATE EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chen Feng, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:  1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/Chen Feng Chen Feng Chandler Chief Executive Officer May 19, 2009 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RONALD DEWEY TROTTER, JR.,

Defendant.

/

CRIMINAL NO. 09-cr-20106

HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH

ORDER REVOKING BOND

On January 5, 2011 the Court held a bond review hearing in this matter. For the reasons

stated on the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s bond is REVOKED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant be remanded to the custody of the United

States Marshal forthwith pending sentencing in this matter to take place on January 11, 2011 @ 2:00

p.m.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 5, 2011 s/Mark A. Goldsmith 

Flint, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH

United States District Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or First Class

U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 5, 2011.

s/Deborah J. Goltz 

DEBORAH J. GOLTZ

Case Manager

4:09-cr-20106-TGB-MJH Doc # 22 Filed 01/05/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 54