alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3803 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3803

To authorize funds for the George Bush School of Government and Public 
                                Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 1996

Mr. Barton of Texas (for himself, Mr. Goodling, Mr. Clay, Mr. Edwards, 
   Mr. Laughlin, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Bereuter, Mr. Fields of Texas, Mr. 
  Montgomery, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Pete Geren of Texas, Mr. Wilson, Mr. 
   Watts of Oklahoma, Mr. Greenwood, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Ehrlich, Mr. 
Gonzalez, Mr. Weller, Mr. Frost, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. de la Garza, Mr. Sam 
  Johnson of Texas, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Stenholm, Mr. Tejeda, Mr. Bateman, 
Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Green of Texas, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. 
King, Mr. Thornberry, Mrs. Vucanovich, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Combest, 
   Mr. Chapman, Mr. Brewster, Mr. Portman, Mr. Bryant of Texas, Mr. 
Sisisky, Mr. Barrett of Nebraska, Mr. Coleman, Mr. Packard, Mrs. Kelly, 
  Mr. Stokes, Mr. Linder, and Mr. Lipinski) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Economic and Educational 
                             Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize funds for the George Bush School of Government and Public 
                                Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``George Bush School of Government and 
Public Service Act''.

SEC. 2. GRANT AUTHORIZED.

    In recognition of the public service of President George Bush, the 
Secretary of Education is authorized be make a grant in accordance with 
the provisions of this Act to assist in the establishment of the George 
Bush Fellowship Program, located at the George Bush School of 
Government and Public Service of the Texas A & M University.

SEC. 3. GRANT CONDITIONS.

    No payment may be made under this Act except upon an application at 
such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such 
information as the Secretary of Education may require.

SEC. 4. APPROPRIATIONS AUTHORIZED.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums, not to exceed 
$3,000,000, as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this 
Act.

SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(Registration Nos. 333-59154, 333-103376, 333-0108929, and 333-107814) and Form S-8 (RegistrationNos. 333-52620, 333-91434, 333-99853 333-103242, 333-117763, 333-119767 and 333-138328) ofMercantile Bank Corporation of our reports dated February 25, 2008 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and the effectiveness of Mercantile Bank Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K./s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3676

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 18, 1996

Received

AN ACT

To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the intent

of Congress with respect to the Federal carjacking prohibition.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 3676 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carjacking Correction

3 Act of 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF INTENT OF CONGRESS IN FED5 ERAL CARJACKING PROHIBITION.

6 Section 2119(2) of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended by inserting ‘‘, including any conduct that, if the

8 conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial

9 jurisdiction of the United States, would violate section

10 2241 or 2242 of this title’’ after (as defined in section

11 1365 of this title’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 17,

1996.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 388

To require the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, in meeting the needs of the National Aeronautics and Space

Administration for additional facilities, to select abandoned and

underutilized facilities in depressed communities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Science.

A BILL

To require the Administrator of the National Aeronautics

and Space Administration, in meeting the needs of the

National Aeronautics and Space Administration for additional facilities, to select abandoned and underutilized

facilities in depressed communities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act shall be cited as the ‘‘National Aeronautics

5 and Space Administration Decentralization Act of 1993.’’
2

HR 388 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF ABANDONED AND UNDERUTILIZED BUILD2 INGS, GROUNDS, AND FACILITIES.

3 In meeting the needs of the National Aeronautics and

4 Space Administration for additional facilities, the Admin5 istrator shall select abandoned and underutilized build6 ings, grounds, and facilities in depressed communities that

7 can be converted to National Aeronautics and Space Ad8 ministration facilities at a reasonable cost, as determined

9 by the Administrator.

10 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

11 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘depressed com12 munities’’ means rural and urban communities that are

13 relatively depressed, in terms of age of housing, extent of

14 poverty, growth of per capita income, extent of unemploy15 ment, job lag, or surplus labor.

Æ
**EXHIBIT32**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, Don R. Kania, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of FEI Company on Form 10-Kfor the annual period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such annual report on Form 10-K fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of FEI Company.
| By:                                   | /s/ DON R. KANIA |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
| Don R. Kania                          |             |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |             |

 

February 26, 2007

I,Raymond A. Link, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annualreport of FEI Company on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such annualreport on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of FEI Company.
| By:                          | /s/ RAYMOND A. LINK |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Raymond A. Link              |                |
| Executive Vice President and |                |
| Chief Financial Officer      |                |

 

February 26, 2007

----
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 17

Dockets.Justia.com
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Nos. 333-59243, 333-38156, 333-91140 on Form S-8 of A.C. Moore Arts &
Crafts, Inc. of our report dated March, 2006 relating to the financial
statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 13, 2006
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2





                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
CIT Group Inc.:


We have examined management's assertion about The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc.'s (the "Company's"), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc.,
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, included in the
accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I) for Chase Manhattan RV Owner
Trust 1997-A and Chase Manhattan Marine Owner Trust 1997-A. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, NY
March 23, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1681]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 72-14, 50-346, 72-1004 (License No. NPF-3)]


Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station; Toledo Edison Company; Receipt 
of Petition for Director's Decision Under 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that by a Petition dated December 5, 1995, 
filed on behalf of the Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy, Alice Hirt, 
Charlene Johnston, Dini Schut, and William Hoops (Petitioners), the 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission was requested to immediately issue orders 
to prevent the loading of spent nuclear fuel into the VECTRA 
Technologies Inc., NUHOMS-24P dry shielded canisters (DSCs) at the 
Davis-Besse nuclear power station until an NRC rulemaking and/or 
license modification hearing is conducted on all safety-related changes 
which have been made to the canisters, as described in the Safety 
Analysis Report. Also, the NRC was requested not to authorize any 
loading of the canisters until a written procedure for unloading in 
both urgent and nonurgent circumstances is written, approved, and 
field-tested.
    Petitioners contend that the safety of the canisters has been 
compromised because of reduction in the thickness of the canister 
welds. In addition, they claim that the NRC administrative process by 
which permission was granted for VECTRA to deliver the canisters to the 
Davis-Besse station and for the canisters to be used on site are 
legally suspect, expressing the belief that agency rulemaking or some 
other public proceeding is necessary for permission for such a transfer 
and use to be granted.
    The Petition is being treated pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.206 of 
the Commission's regulations. The Petition has been referred to the 
Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. As 
provided by Section 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on this 
Petition within a reasonable time. By letter dated December 18, 1995, 
the Director denied the Petitioners' request for immediate action on 
the Petition.
    A copy of the Petition is available for inspection at the 
Commission's Public Document Room at 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 
20555.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 23rd day of January 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carl J. Paperiello,
Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 96-1681 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-p
#### Robert WETMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 52183.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 25, 1996.

Gary E. Brotherton, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Kurt U. Schaeffer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals form the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Deer Consumer Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zongshu Nie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Zongshu NieZongshu Nie

Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 368

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma

to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for certain

radiation-exposed veterans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchioloalveolar carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to

be service-connected for certain radiation-exposed

veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT BRONCHIOLO-ALVEOLAR

4 CARCINOMA IS SERVICE-CONNECTED.

5 Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code,

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph:
2

•HR 368 IH

1 ‘‘(P) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.’’.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3955

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable credit

to businesses which recycle office wastes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a

refundable credit to businesses which recycle office wastes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR BUSINESSES WHICH

4 RECYCLE OFFICE WASTES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart C of part IV of sub6 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of

7 1986 (relating to refundable credits) is amended by redes8 ignating section 35 as section 36 and by inserting after

9 section 34 the following new section:
2

•HR 3955 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 35. CREDIT FOR RECYCLING OFFICE WASTES.

2 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of a tax3 payer engaged in a trade or business, there shall be al4 lowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this subtitle

5 for the taxable year an amount equal to 3 cents for each

6 pound of office waste recycled by the taxpayer during the

7 taxable year.

8 ‘‘(b) OFFICE WASTE.—For purposes of this section,

9 the term ‘office waste’ means glass, paper, cardboard,

10 metal cans, and other office-related products which are

11 used in a trade or business conducted by the taxpayer.’’

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

13 for such subpart C is amended by striking the last item

14 and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 35. Credit for recycling office wastes.

‘‘Sec. 36. Overpayments of tax.’’

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall apply to substances recycled after the

17 date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending

18 after such date.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50159

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOEL MATA-GOMEZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-99-CR-592-1

--------------------

December 13, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

In this direct criminal appeal, Joel Mata-Gomez (“Mata”)

argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying

his motion for extension of time to file an untimely notice of

appeal based on his “excusable neglect,” pursuant to FED. R. APP.

P. 4(b)(4). Mata argues that his attorney’s having mistakenly

relied on the counting rule of FED. R. CRIM. P. 45(a), rather than

the appropriate rule, FED. R. APP. P. 26, amounted to “excusable

neglect.”
No. 00-50159

-2-

Rule 4(b)(1)(A)(i), FED. R. APP. P., provides that a notice

of appeal must be filed in a criminal case within ten days of

entry of judgment. It is not disputed that Mata filed his notice

of appeal three days late.

 “[A] misconstruction of the rules–-especially when their

language is plain–-will rarely satisfy the ‘excusable neglect’

standard.” Halicki v. Louisiana Casino Cruises, Inc., 151 F.3d

465, 469 (5th Cir. 1998) (applying nearly identical excusableneglect rule of FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5) in civil appeal). If “the

rule at issue is unambiguous, a district court’s determination

that the neglect was inexcusable is virtually unassailable.” Id.

at 470. In a case almost identical to this one, this court

opined that FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(B) and the counting rule of

FED. R. APP. P. 26(a) were “unambiguous.” United States v. Clark,

51 F.3d 42, 44 (5th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the district court

did not abuse its discretion in determining that Mata had made no

showing of excusable neglect.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
**EXHIBIT 21**SUBSIDIARIES OF MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION   Mercantile Bank of Michigan, a Michigan banking corporation  Wholly-owned bank subsidiary of Mercantile Bank Corporation   Mercantile Bank Capital Trust I  A Delaware business trust subsidiary of Mercantile Bank Corporation   Mercantile Bank Mortgage Company, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company  99% owned by Mercantile Bank of Michigan and 1% owned by Mercantile Insurance Center, Inc.   Mercantile Insurance Center, Inc, a Michigan business corporation  Wholly-owned subsidiary of Mercantile Bank of Michigan   Mercantile Bank Real Estate Co., LLC, a Michigan limited liability company  99% owned by Mercantile Bank of Michigan and 1% owned by Mercantile Insurance Center, Inc.All five of the subsidiaries named above with the exception of Mercantile Bank Capital Trust I wereorganized under the laws of the State of Michigan. Mercantile Bank Capital Trust I was organizedunder the laws of the State of Delaware.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 9, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36088-36089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,098]


Oshkosh B'Gosh, Columbia Cutting, Columbia, KY; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reopening

    On April 22, 1996, the Department issued a Negative Determination 
Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance,

[[Page 36089]]

applicable to all workers of Oshkosh B'Gosh, located in Albemarle, 
North Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 
16, 1996 (FR 61 24814).
    Based on a petitioner inquiry, the Department, on its own motion, 
reviewed the findings of the investigation. New findings show that the 
fabric cutting operations performed by workers of the subject firm 
supported production of apparel at other Oshkosh B'Gosh plants. TAA 
certifications have been issued for workers of Oshkosh B'Gosh 
production facilities in various States.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reopening, 
I conclude that increased imports of articles like or directly 
competitive with apparel contributed importantly to the declines in 
sales or production and to the total or partial separation of workers 
of Oshkosh B'Gosh, Columbia Cutting, Columbia, Kentucky. In accordance 
with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification:

    All workers of Oshkosh B'Gosh, Columbia Cutting, Columbia, 
Kentucky, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after March 11, 1995, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 21st day of June 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-17382 Filed 7-8-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M