alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35726]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17223]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Business Development Center Applications: Charleston, South 
Carolina

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency is cancelling the 
announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate the Charleston, 
South Carolina MBDC. This solicitation was originally published in the 
Federal Register, Wednesday, June 12, 1996, Vol. 61, No. 114, 29737.

    11.800 Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: July 1, 1996.
Frances B. Douglas,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business 
Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 96-17223 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-P
1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the United States’ Motion for Leave for Counsel to 

Appear by Phone or Videoconference at the Court’s presently-scheduled hearing on 

December 3, 2021, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the United States’ Motion for Leave for 

Counsel to Appear by Phone or Videoconference. 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1408-1 Filed 11/30/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DARRYL BAKER,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-10360

v. DISTRICT JUDGE NANCY G. EDMUNDS

BANNUM PLACE OF SAGINAW, MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON

LaTOYA BURNSIDE, DOROTHY

JONES, CLAIRINET McFADDEN,

VERTRICE ROBY, MR. LYONS,

MARK A. CUNEEN, JODY BRADELY,

HENRY HOBSON and MS. FRIERSON,

Defendants.

 /

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, a former halfway house resident at Bannum Place of Saginaw, filed this action

stating claims cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 18, 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion

For Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. #5). On July 22, 2009, Plaintiff’s case was

referred to the undersigned for all pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A). For

the following reasons, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff provide this Court with a proposed

amended complaint (with proposed changes clearly marked).

Opinion

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course

before being served with a responsive pleading. Since Defendants have not yet been served,

- 1 -

2:09-cv-10360-NGE-MAR Doc # 14 Filed 07/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 30
Plaintiff may be entitled to amend his complaint. However, leave to amend may always be

denied if the proposed amendment is futile. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962).

Due to the fact that Plaintiff failed to submit a copy of his proposed amended complaint

with his motion in accordance with E.D. Mich. L. R. 15.1, or fully explain in his motion how he

wishes to amend his complaint, the undersigned cannot make a determination on Plaintiff’s

motion for leave to amend. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to submit his proposed amended

complaint on or before August 14, 2009, so that the Court may determine whether the proposed

amendment(s) can be allowed. Plaintiff’s proposed amended complaint shall be clearly marked

to delineate where changes have been proposed to be made from the original complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall submit a pleading titled “Proposed

Amended Complaint” on or before August 14, 2009, with all proposed changes clearly

delineated, or this motion will be deemed dismissed.

SO ORDERED.

s/Mark A. Randon 

Mark A. Randon

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: July 30, 2009

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the parties of record

on this date, July 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Melody R. Miles 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5540

- 2 -

2:09-cv-10360-NGE-MAR Doc # 14 Filed 07/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 31
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

    Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Each of the undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer, of ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc., hereby
certifies that, on the date hereof:

1.       The annual report on Form 10-K of ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc. for the twelve
         months ended December 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the
         Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with
         the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934; and

2.       Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc.

Date:    March 31, 2003                   /s/ Larry F. Williams
     ----------------------              ------------------------------------
                                         Larry F. Williams
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date:    March 31, 2003                   /s/ Douglas A. Shumate
     ----------------------              ------------------------------------
                                         Douglas A. Shumate
                                         Senior Vice President-
                                          Chief Financial Officer
IV 

House Calendar No. 140 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 962 

[Report No. 111–369] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2009 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of December 10, 2009, pro6 viding for further consideration or disposition of the bill 

7 (H.R. 4173) to provide for financial regulatory reform, to 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 962 RH 

1 protect consumers and investors, to enhance Federal un2 derstanding of insurance issues, to regulate the over-the3 counter derivatives markets, and for other purposes. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS

tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 140 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 962 

[Report No. 111–369] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 9, 2009 

Referred to the House calendar and ordered to be printed 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Solutions Mechanical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffery Thompson, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Jeffery Thompson Jeffery Thompson Title: President and Chief Financial Officer  May 15, 2008
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 48 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
#### Dereco JENNINGS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 67852.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 12, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1996.

*811Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for movant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Joanne E. Beal, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondeni/respon-dent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The state concedes the necessity of an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether movant was misinformed about his sentence. Thus, we reverse and remand. We affirm in all other respects.

Little discussion is required in light of the state’s concession. There is no reason to limit the evidentiary hearing as the state requests because the allegation on this issue in movant’s *pro se*motion was not limited to only one count of the plea. We have examined movant’s other points and conclude that an evidentiary hearing is not required on those claims of error.

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing in part,
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 39 Att. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2020

No. 04-19-00887-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.S., A CHILD

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00363

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant's First Motion for Extension of Time to file Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

The appellant's brief is due on March 3, 2020.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this quarterly report of Endeavor Power Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  May 15, 2010 | s/Richard O. Weed_____________________

Richard O. Weed, Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEPHEN HALL,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

MICHAEL WARREN, et al,

Defendant(s).

/

CASE NO. 08-14709

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET TRIAL DATE

Before the Court is plaintiff’s Motion to Set Trial Date. Plaintiff’s counsel seeks to

have the trial in this matter scheduled during the first two weeks of February 2013.

Defendants do not object. The Court being fully advised in the premises,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is granted. A jury trial in this matter is set for

Monday, January 28, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 15, 2012 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on

this date, October 15, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:08-cv-14709-AC-CEB Doc # 73 Filed 10/15/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 672
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003


         In connection with the Annual Report of Myriad Entertainment & Resorts,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott Hawrelechko, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods
                  presented in the Report.

/S/ SCOTT HAWRELECHKO
---------------------
Scott Hawrelechko
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Myriad Entertainment & Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Myriad
Entertainment & Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1621]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 185; Aeronautical Spectrum Planning 
Issues

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
Special Committee 185 meeting to be held on February 28-29, 1996, 
starting at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 
Connecticut Avenue NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Administrative Remarks; (2) 
Introductions; (3) Review and Approval of the Agenda; (4) Review and 
Approval of the Summary of the Previous Meeting; (5) Review Draft 
Version 6 of SC-185 Report; (6) Develop Conclusions and 
Recommendations; (7) Other Business; (8) Date and Place of Next 
Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 23, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-1621 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TAMARA OWENS,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant.

Case No. 09-10267

DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

MICHAEL HLUCHANIUK

______________________________/

ORDER

ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [18],

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12], 

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15],

and

DISMISSING THE CASE

On February 26, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation [18]

recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [12] be denied, Defendant’s Motion

for Summary Judgment [15] be granted, and that the case be dismissed.

No objections were filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case. 

The Report and Recommendation [18] of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED, and

is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [12] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [15] is

GRANTED.

This case is hereby DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

Arthur J. Tarnow

United States District Judge
Dated: March 24, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

March 24, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/LISA M. WARE 

Case Manager
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended January 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rohit
Singh, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Date:
March 11, 2010








ROHIT
SINGH


Rohit
Singh


Chief
Accounting Officer


Chief
Financial Officer and Director








-1-
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




     1.   Liberty Acquisition Corporation, a Tennessee corporation and wholly
          owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

     2.   Special Omega Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and
          wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

     3.   Pentegra Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
          subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

     4.   Edge Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and wholly
          owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

     5.   TW Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and wholly
          owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.
#### Elwood Rodney BUMBRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6554.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 15, 2003.

Decided Aug. 6, 2003.

Elwood Rodney Bumbray, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Elwood R. Bumbray seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is appealable only if a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1040, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bumbray has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*221fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SOFTVIEW LLC,

Appellant

v.

KYOCERA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA 

MOBILITY LLC,

Appellees

______________________ 

2014-1600

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Nos. IPR2013-

00007, IPR2013-00256.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MORGAN CHU, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, 

argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL KAI LU,

ALAN J. HEINRICH. 

 ERIC C. COHEN, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, 

Chicago, IL, argued for appellee Kyocera Corporation. 

Also represented by MICHAEL TOMSA, MICHAEL ADAM 

DORFMAN. 
 

JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton 

LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola 

Mobility LLC. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD 

CHARNES; DAVID A. REED, CANDICE C. DECAIRE, ALYSON L.

WOOTEN, WILLIAM HENRY BOICE, Atlanta, GA;

CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER,

NATHAN K. KELLEY. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court