alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDED

DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: September 13, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg and Gopi 

K. Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant 

Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 5):

9:07 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury is not present. Discussion held with counsel and Juror #8. 9:17 a.m. 

Jury present. Carl Ferrer examined further. Exhibits 10, 10a, 19, 20, 1155, 1156, 1835, and 1835a-c, 

are admitted. 10:32 a.m. Jury exits courtroom. Discussion held with counsel. 10:34 a.m. Recess.

10:54 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1162, 23, 547, 549, 

1164, and 551 are admitted. 12:03 p.m. Recess.

1:03 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1841, 1849, 1849a, 

1851, 1857, 1857a-b, 567, 567a, 899, 899e, 837, 1941, 1941a, 1172, 1172a, 1174, 1935, 24, 24a, 570, 

1151, 1151a, 1944, 573a, 1862 and 574 are admitted. 2:37 p.m. Recess.

2:59 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1946, 575, 575b, 28, 

579, 902, 585, 585a, 34, 35, 588, and 311 are admitted. 4:31 p.m. Court in recess until Thursday, 

September 14, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

Court Reporter Hilda Lopez/Teri Veres

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 9:07 AM

Stop: 4:31 PM

Total: 5hrs 42min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1794 Filed 09/13/23 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Clint Schuler, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

United Healthcare (UHC) of Arizona 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00920-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 43), filed 

on November 5, 2018, 

 IT IS ORDERED approving the Stipulation (Doc. 43) and dismissing this action 

in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this 

action. 

 Dated this 6th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00920-DJH Document 44 Filed 11/06/18 Page 1 of 1
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 16
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 17
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 18
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 19
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 20
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 21
2:08-cr-20505-AC-PJK Doc # 7 Filed 11/02/09 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 22
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sawadee Ventures (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rachna Khanna,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Rachna Khanna
------------------------------------
Rachna Khanna
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 92C-0179]


Microbio Resources, Inc.; Withdrawal of a Color Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
withdrawal, without prejudice to future filing, of a color additive 
petition (CAP 1C0237) proposing that the color additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of comminuted Haematococcus 
pluvialis algae meal as a color additive in aquaculture feeds.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James C. Wallwork, Center for Food 
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-217), Food and Drug Administration, 
200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204-0001, 202-418-3066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
Register of June 18, 1992 (57 FR 27256), FDA announced that a color 
additive petition (CAP 1C0237) had been filed by Microbio Resources, 
Inc., 6150 Lusk Blvd., suite B-105, San Diego, CA 92121. The petition 
proposed that 21 CFR part 73 of the color additive regulations be 
amended to provide for the safe use of comminuted Haematococcus 
pluvialis algae meal as a color additive in aquaculture feeds. Microbio 
Resources, Inc., 18278 Hadden Hall Ct., San Diego, CA 92128, has now 
withdrawn the petition without prejudice to a future filing (21 CFR 
71.6(c)(2)).

    Dated: June 20, 1996.
George H. Pauli,
Acting Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 96-17059 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 39 Att. 35

Dockets.Justia.com
#### Tracy D. RELEFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 49975.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1995.

Laura G. Martin, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and HANNA, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD LEE HASSELBRING,

Petitioner,

v. Case Number: 2:08-cv-14845

Honorable George Caram Steeh

DEBRA SCUTT,

Respondent.

________________________________________/

JUDGMENT

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to this Court’s Opinion and Order dated

January 23, 2012, the habeas petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: s/M. Beauchemin 

 DEPUTY COURT CLERK

Dated: January 23, 2012

2:08-cv-14845-GCS-DAS Doc # 11 Filed 01/23/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 2507
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15729]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-339]


Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) 
has granted the request of Virginia Electric and Power Company (the 
licensee) to withdraw its October 17, 1995, application for proposed 
amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF-7 for the North Anna 
Power Station, Unit No. 2, located in Louisa County, Virginia.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the Technical 
Specifications pertaining to the minimum number of steam generators 
required to be inspected during the first inservice inspection 
following steam generator replacement.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on November 27, 
1995 (60 FR 58406). However, by letter dated February 19, 1996, the 
licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated October 17, 1995, and the licensee's 
letter dated February 19, 1996, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, 
NW., Washington, DC, and the Alderman Library, Special Collections 
Department, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-
2498.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 7th day of June 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bart C. Buckley,
Senior Project Manager, Project Directorate II-1, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 96-15729 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B., A CHILD. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00048

- CV

Appeal from

112th District Court

of Pecos County, Texas

(TC # 11,741)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any

, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
**Exhibit 10.25**

 

**ITC^DeltaCom, Inc.**

 

**Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation**

 

**Non-employee directors of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) receive cash and receive equity-based fees pursuant to the ITC^DeltaCom,Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). 

 

The Company’s current policy is to pay each non-employee director an annual fee for service on the board of directors of $30,000 in cash and, subject to review at least annually, restricted stock unitsrepresenting 2,000 shares of common stock, which vest with respect to one third of the shares subject to such awards on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. The chairman of the audit committee also receives an annual fee of$5,000. 

 

Each non-employee director receives fees of $1,000 foreach board meeting attended in person, $500 for each board meeting attended by conference telephone and $500 for each committee meeting, whether in person or by teleconference. 

 

The Company’s current policy is to grant non-employee directors options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stockpursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan upon their initial appointment to the board of directors. The exercise price per share under each option granted to a non-employee director upon appointment is the fair market value of the common stock on theoption grant date. Each such option awarded pursuant to this policy vests with respect to one third of the shares subject to such option on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. No option is exercisable more than ten yearsafter the option grant date. Upon the termination of a non-employee director’s service for any reason (other than for cause), any options granted to the director will vest, and the director will have the right, at any time within a specifiedperiod after the date of termination of service and prior to termination of the options, to exercise any options held by the director on the service termination date.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EDWARD FRANK LINT, JR.,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 09-10044

 HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

JOHN PRELESNIK,

Respondent.

________________________________/

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on this date,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DENIED. Judgment is entered in favor of respondent and against petitioner.

__________________________________

DAVID J. WEAVER

CLERK OF THE COURT

BY: s/Josephine Chaffee 

 DEPUTY COURT CLERK

Dated: July 29, 2011

2:09-cv-10044-GCS-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 07/29/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 1323
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16693]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


National Library of Education Advisory Task Force Meeting

AGENCY: National Library of Education Advisory Task Force.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda for 
the third meeting of the National Library of Education Advisory Task 
Force (Task Force). This notice also describes the functions of the 
Task Force. Notice of this meeting is required under section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and is intended to notify the 
public of their opportunity to attend.

DATE AND TIME: July 31, 1996, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.; August 1, 1996, 9 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m.; August 2, 1996, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: July 31, 1996, Room 5272, Boelter Hall, University of 
California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; August 1 and 2, 
1996, Room 3340, Moore Hall (Reading Room), University of California at 
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E. Stephen Hunt, National Library of 
Education, 555 New Jersey Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20208-5523. 
Telephone: (202) 219-1882; FAX: (202) 219-1970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Library of Education Advisory 
Task Force is authorized by Part E, Section 951(h) of the Educational 
Research, Development, Dissemination, and Improvement Act of 1994. The 
Task Force prepares a set of recommendations on the establishment and 
development of the National Library of Education for presentation to 
the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Educational Research and 
Improvement.
    The meeting of the Task Force is open to the public. The agenda for 
July 31-August 2, 1996 includes the discussion of drafts of sections of 
the Task Force Report, dialogue with members of the public from the 
Western United States who wish to attend and are unable to attend East 
Coast meetings, and the conduct of Task Force business including 
planning the completion and final presentation of the Task Force 
Report.
    A final agenda will be available from the offices of the National 
Library of Education on July 12, 1996.
    Records are kept of all Task Force proceedings, and are available 
for public inspection at the central office of the National Library of 
Education, 555 New Jersey Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20208-5523 between 
the hours of 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
Sharon P. Robinson,
Assistant Secretary, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
[FR Doc. 96-16693 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16716]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: July 19, 1996.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 5196, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Ms. Carol Campbell, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5196, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1257.

    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: July 30, 1996.
    Time: 11:30 a.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4150, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marcia Litwack, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4150, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1719.

    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: July 31, 1996.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 4150, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marcia Litwack, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4150, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1719.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 24, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-16716 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patricia Niu, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ PATRICIA NIU                          
|Patricia Niu                              
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|August 12, 2009                           

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of
the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN MOORE, 

Plaintiff,

Case Number: 2:08-CV-15132

v.

PAUL D. BORMAN 

OAKLAND COUNTY BAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ASSOCIATION, et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

RECONSIDERATION

Before the Court is Plaintiff John Moore’s Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration of the

Court’s January 30, 2009 Order of Dismissal. 

Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(g) provides the standards for a motion for

reconsideration, and states:

[T]he court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration that merely

present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable

implication. The movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the

court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will

result in a different disposition of the case.

A “palpable defect” is a defect which is obvious, clear, unmistakable, manifest, or plain. Mktg.

Displays, Inc. v. Traffix Devices, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 262, 278 (E.D. Mich. 1997).

The Court’s January 30, 2008 Order of Dismissal clearly provided that due to Plaintiff’s

failure to abide by the Court’s December 17, 2008 Order, which directed Plaintiff to show cause as

to why his Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or submit an

application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court was dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

Case 2:08-cv-15132-PDB-VMM Document 10 Filed 04/17/2009 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff’s Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration does not provide any reasons why Plaintiff

did not pay the required filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this case

(case number 08-cv-15132) or why this Court’s Order of Dismissal was in error. 

Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Dkt. No. 8).

SO ORDERED.

s/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: April 17, 2009

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

April 17, 2009.

s/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

Case 2:08-cv-15132-PDB-VMM Document 10 Filed 04/17/2009 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.23


 


Executive
Officer Compensation


 


The annual base salaries
for our executive officers as of January 1, 2009 are as follows:


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Annual Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  George A. Lopez, M.D.

  	
   

  	
  Chairman of the Board,
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500,000

  	
   

  
	
  Alison D. Burcar

  	
   

  	
  Vice President of
  Marketing

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  195,000

  	
   

  
	
  Richard A. Costello

  	
   

  	
  Vice President of Sales

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  260,000

  	
   

  
	
  Scott E. Lamb

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  250,000

  	
   

  
	
  Steven C. Riggs

  	
   

  	
  Vice President of
  Operations

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  260,000

  	
   

  



 


2008
Discretionary Bonuses:


 


In
July 2008, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved
payment of discretionary bonuses to the above named officers for the first half
of 2008, and in January 2009, the Compensation Committee approved
discretionary bonuses to each of the above named officers for the second half
of 2008.  In addition, Dr. Lopez was
awarded a bonus by the Compensation Committee in January 2009, consistent
with the terms of the 2008 Performance-Based Incentive Plan.  The amount of the bonuses for the first half
of 2008 were previously reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on July 24, 2008, and the amount of the bonuses for the
second half of 2008, excluding Ms. Burcar, were previously reported in the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 5, 2009,
each of which reports are incorporated herein by reference.