1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion (Unopposed) to Extend Time to 

Respond to the Government’s (Sealed) Motion to Compel Destruction of Inadvertently 

Disclosed Documents (Doc. 343) and Motion for Access to Joint Representation and Joint 

Defense Agreements Previously Submitted by Defendants Michael Lacey and James 

Larkin for In Camera Review (Doc. 354), in which they jointly move for an extension of 

the deadline for the Defendants to file a response to Government’s Motion to Compel 

Destruction of Inadvertently Disclosed Documents (Doc. 343) and Government’s Motion 

for Access to the Joint Representation and Joint Defense Agreements Previously Submitted 

by Defendants Michael Lacey and James Larkin for In Camera Review (Doc. 354). (Doc. 

356) 

 Having considered this request, the joint motion fails to comply with Rule 12.1 of 

the Local Rules of Criminal Procedure, which directs the movants to Rule 7.3 of the Local 

Rules of Civil Procedure (“LRCiv”). Rules of Practice of the U.S. District Court for the 

District of Arizona LRCiv 7.3 provides: 

United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 357 Filed 11/01/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(a) A party moving for an extension of time, whether by motion or stipulation, must disclose the existence of all previous extensions which have been granted concerning the matter for which an extension is sought. A statement indicating whether 

the motion or stipulation is the first, second, third, etc. 

requested extension must be included below the title of the 

motion or stipulation, for example: "STIPULATION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER (Second Request)." The party seeking the extension must lodge, separate from the party’s motion or stipulation, a proposed form of order 

consistent with the relief requested, complying with Rule 

7.1(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. 

(b) Except in all civil actions in which a party is an unrepresented prisoner, a party moving for an extension of time, whether by motion or stipulation, must state the position of each other party. If the moving party's efforts to determine the position of any other party are unsuccessful, a statement to 

that effect must be included in the motion or stipulation. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion (Unopposed) to Extend Time to Respond 

to the Government’s (Sealed) Motion to Compel Destruction of Inadvertently Disclosed 

Documents (Doc. 343) and Motion for Access to Joint Representation and Joint Defense 

Agreements Previously Submitted by Defendants Michael Lacey and James Larkin for In 

Camera Review (Doc. 356) is denied without prejudice. 

 Dated this 1st day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 357 Filed 11/01/18 Page 2 of 2