alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1125 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1125

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to provide for the 
  treatment of institutions of higher education as voter registration 
                               agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2009

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to provide for the 
  treatment of institutions of higher education as voter registration 
                               agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Voter Opportunity To 
Encourage Registration Act of 2009'' or the ``Student VOTER Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF UNIVERSITIES AS VOTER REGISTRATION AGENCIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 7(a) of the National Voter Registration 
Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg-5(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (A);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
                    ``(C) each institution of higher education (as 
                defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 
                1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001)) in the State that receives 
                Federal funds.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (6)(A), by inserting ``or, in the case of 
        an institution of higher education, with each registration of a 
        student for enrollment in a course of study'' after 
        ``assistance,''.
    (b) Amendment to Higher Education Act of 1965.--Section 487(a) of 
the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is amended by 
striking paragraph (23).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit D 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-4 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Sum of credit

2015 January $ 35,540.68

2015 February 13,039.10

2015 March 15,852.89

2015 April 21,000.06

2015 May 34,803.99

2015 June 24,950.18

2015 July 234,217.85

2015 August 468,502.52

2015 September 503,083.58

2015 October 1,187,734.66

2015 November 1,546,430.74

2015 December 2,305,815.68

2016 January 2,631,832.32

2016 February 1,935,163.53

2016 March 2,370,125.47

2016 April 2,643,943.38

2016 May 3,564,376.24

2016 June 2,894,618.08

2016 July 2,862,489.84

2016 August 3,126,636.97

2016 September 2,481,482.04

2016 October 1,794,671.54

2016 November 3,405,676.64

2016 December 3,360,314.53

2017 January 2,117,661.74

2017 February 1,671,810.52

2017 March 2,146,932.51

2017 April 2,119,193.65

2017 May 2,116,017.89

Total Credits

Website Technologies LLC account with MBC Limited (d/b/a "GoCoin") in USD

January 2015 - May 2017

Date

USAO_BP-0025780

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-4 Filed 08/19/21 Page 2 of 2
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>    THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION 
            EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE
            PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
            BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           SEP-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<CASH>                                         3,557
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 23,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                     363
<INVENTORY>                                   29,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              67,909
<PP&E>                                        69,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                38,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               109,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         31,785
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       2,132
<OTHER-SE>                                    38,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 109,515
<SALES>                                      124,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             124,264
<CGS>                                         85,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 85,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              31,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,807
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                   142
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,657
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $0.37
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Douglas E. Ford, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sawadee Ventures,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Douglas E. Ford
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1067** 

I n R e: HENRY EARL MILLER , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 6:04

- cr - 00022

- HFF

- 3 )

Submitted : March 16, 2010 Decided: March 17, 20 10

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Henry Earl Miller , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller is serv ing a 300

- month sentence following his guilty plea to a rmed robbery , using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence , and aiding and abetting these offenses

. Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order vacating his sentence and remand ing to the district
court for resentencing in light of Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38 (2007). Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances , when “the petitioner has no other adequate means to obtain relief to which ther e is a clear and indisputable right.” In re Blackwater Sec. Consulting, L.L.C. , 460 F.3d 576, 592 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotations and citation omitted). “Courts are extremely reluctant to grant a writ of mandamus.” In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4 th Cir. 1987). The relief sought by Miller is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny his motion for leave to proceed on direct appeal or by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp., Inc., for the Quarter October 31, 2005, I, Joseph Blimline, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp., Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.    Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.    The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp., Inc. 

 
| Dated: December 12, 2005 |
|--------------------------|

 

**Advanced Technology Petroleum Corp., INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Joseph Blimline*Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Andrew Padilla,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-006-PHX-DJH

JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the 

reason that the jury has returned its verdict, finding the Defendant not guilty as to Counts

1-51 of the Superseding Indictment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant is hereby 

acquitted and discharged pursuant to Rule 32(k), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Dated this 16th day of November, 2023.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1979 Filed 11/17/23 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT TARA MINERALS CORP. Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the transition report of Tara Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Francis Richard Biscan, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Clifford A. Brown, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.   Date:   May 17, 2010 /s/ Francis Richard Biscan Francis Richard Biscan, Principal Executive Officer   Date:   May 17, 2010 /s/ Clifford A. Brown Clifford A. Brown, Principal Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Micah Fialka−Feldman,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:08−cv−14922−PJD−VMM

Hon. Patrick J Duggan

Oakland University Board of

Trustees,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING

 You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable Patrick J Duggan at the United

States District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Detroit,

Michigan. The following motion(s) are scheduled for hearing:

Motion for Preliminary Injunction − #4

Motion to Expedite − #4

• MOTION HEARING: 1/13/09 at 02:15 PM

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/ M. Orem 

Case Manager

Dated: December 18, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   March 22, 2011



/s/ Andrew BrodkeyAndrew Brodkey, CEO
(Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



Dated:  March 22, 2011



/s/ Rakesh MalhotraRakesh Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_


EXHIBIT 10.20




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

THE PHOENIX COMPANIES, INC. 

NONQUALIFIED SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE

RETIREMENT PLAN 

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009




The Phoenix Companies, Inc. Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”), further amended effective March 31, 2010, and is further amended effective November 19, 2013, as follows:




1.

Section 2.4A is added to read as follows:




2.4A

“Domestic Partner” with respect to any Participant means a person of the same sex who cohabitates or resides with a Participant and meets each of the following: 




(a)

is the Participant's sole domestic partner and intends to remain so indefinitely;




(b)

is unmarried, at least eighteen (18) years of age, and mentally competent to consent to contract;




(c)

is unrelated to the Participant by blood or adoption to a degree of closeness that would prohibit legal marriage in the state in which the Participant and such person reside;




(d)

cohabitates or resides with the Participant as domestic partners and intends to do so indefinitely;




(e)

resides with the Participant in a state that prohibits legal marriage between same sex individuals;




(f)

has lived with the Participant as domestic partners for at least 12 consecutive months;




(g)

is jointly responsible, with the Participant, for their common welfare and financial obligations; and




(h)

provided such person attests to the person's domestic partnership with the Participant in an affidavit filed with the Administrator and provides sufficient proof of their interdependence.



























-1-






EXHIBIT 10.20




2.

Section 4.10 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:




4.10

Death Benefits  If the spouse or Domestic Partner of a Participant in the Plan is entitled to a death benefit under the Pension Plan, said spouse or Domestic Partner shall be entitled to receive from the Employer a death benefit under this Plan equal to the difference between (a) the death benefit that would be payable under the Pension Plan as of the date of the Participant’s death if such benefit were calculated based on the benefit described in this Article IV; and (b) the death benefit actually payable under the Pension Plan as of the date of the Participant’s death, calculated in accordance with the terms of the Pension Plan.  No death benefit other than that set forth in this Section 4.10 shall be payable under this Plan if a Participant dies prior to the commencement of benefit payments under this Plan.  Following the commencement of payments under this Plan, death benefits shall only be payable to the extent the Participant is receiving benefits in the form of a survivor benefit or an annuity or installments that has a period certain component and the minimum payment period has not lapsed.















-2-
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 20

Dockets.Justia.com
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Manuel Ceballos Padilla, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Enrique M. Lucero, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-18-00121-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

 Petitioner, Manuel Ceballos Padilla, filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

on January 12, 2018. Respondents filed a response on February 20, 2018 and Petitioner 

filed a reply on March 13, 2018. 

 The Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on September 6, 

2018 recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 2241 be denied. Also on September 6, 2018 Petitioner filed a Motion to Expedite 

Decision. On September 19, 2018 Petitioner filed timely written objections to the Report 

and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. On October 2, 2018, Respondents’ filed a 

Notice of Petitioner’s Removal and Suggestion of Mootness advising the Court that 

Petitioner was removed to Mexico on September 21, 2018. Attached to the Notice are 

documents confirming Petitioner’s removal through the Nogales Arizona Port of Entry on 

September 21, 2018. 

 The Court finds the Petition for Writ for Writ of Habeas Corpus to be moot as 

Petitioner is no longer in custody. 

. . . 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as moot. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner’s Motion to Expedite 

Decision. (Doc. 32). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. 

 Dated this 18th day of October, 2018.