alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Jeffery Thompson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solutions Mechanical, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: May 15, 2009   /s/ Jeffery Thompson Jeffery Thompson Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit Description 

1. Deposition of Mary Beth Snyder 

2. Affidavit of Deborah Middlebrook 

3. Affidavit of Linda Sisson 

4. Stewart v. Barnhart, 2005 WL 3088543 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 14, 2005) 

5. Contract for Residence Hall Services 2007-08 

6. Deposition of Lionel Maten 

7. IPEDS Report 

8. 2009-10 NCES Survey Material: FAQ 

9. FISAP Report 

10. FISAP Instructions 

11. Affidavit of Mary Beth Snyder, 11/13/2009 

12. Deposition of Janice Fialka 

13. Deposition of Plaintiff 

14. Deposition of Robert Wiggins 

15. Divito v. Oakland University 

16. March 19, 2007 Proposal 

17. MORC Record of PCP 

18. Provost Memo 

19. Wiggins’ E-mail to Feldman 

20. Affidavit of Roxanne Fisher 

21. Transcript of Board of Trustees Meeting 

22. Sutton v. Piper, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17201 (6th Cir. July 30, 2009) 

Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
23. Affidavit of Mary Beth Snyder, 1/5/2009

256859
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32792-32793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG96-76-000]

AYP Energy, Inc.; Notice of Application for Commission 
Determination of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

June 19, 1996.
    On June 7, 1996, AYP Energy, Inc. (``Applicant'') filed with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an application for determination 
of exempt wholesale generator status pursuant to Part 365 of the 
Commission's Regulations.
    Applicant is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of 
Delaware. Applicant is a wholly owned subsidiary of AYP Capital, Inc. 
(``AYP''), which itself is a wholly owned subsidiary of Allegheny Power 
System, Inc. (``APS''), a registered electric utility holding company. 
Applicant's business address is c/o Allegheny Power Service 
Corporation, 800 Cabin Hill Drive, Greensburg, PA 15601 (Attn: Theresa 
Colecchia).
    The eligible facility consists primarily of a 50 percent undivided 
interest in Unit No. 1 of the Fort Martin Power Station, an operating 
steam-electric generating unit, and associated portion of Ft. Martin 
Unit 1's main transformers. Ft. Martin Unit 1 is located in West 
Virginia on the Monongahela River between Morgantown, West Virginia and 
Point Marion, Pennsylvania. The portion of Ft. Martin Unit 1 that is 
the eligible facility is currently owned by Duquesne Light Company 
(``Duquesne''), a Pennsylvania public utility not affiliated with APS; 
however, Duquesne has entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (dated 
November 28, 1995) with AYP, pursuant to which Duquesne will sell on or 
before December 31, 1996 its undivided ownership interest in Ft. Martin 
Unit 1 (including its interest in the transformers) to AYP, which will 
assign the Asset Purchase Agreement to AYP Energy, Inc. The remainder 
of the facility of which the eligible facility is a portion is owned by 
Monogahela Power Company (``MPC'') and The Potomac Edison Company 
(``PEC''), two of the three wholly owned electric operating 
subsidiaries of APS.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for 
exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or 
comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 
and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. The 
Commission will limit its consideration of comments to those that 
concern the adequacy or accuracy of the application. All such motions 
or comments should be filed on or before June 28, 1996, and must be 
served on the applicant. Any person wishing to become a party must file 
a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on

[[Page 32793]]

file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16073 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc.





Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Kai GUI, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated this 17th day of September, 2009./s/ Kai GUI
Kai GUI, Director, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GARY M. RESTAINO

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

JOSEPH F. BOZDECH

California State Bar No. 303453

Assistant United States Attorney

Two Renaissance Square

40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone: (602) 514-7500

Email: Joseph.Bozdech@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CR-18-422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, gives 

notice that JOSEPH F. BOZDECH files his appearance as counsel for the United States 

of America regarding forfeiture in the above-captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted this 8th day of November 2023.

GARY M. RESTAINO

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

/S/Joseph F. Bozdech

JOSEPH F. BOZDECH

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1955 Filed 11/08/23 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that on November 8, 2023, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: 

counsel of record. 

By: S/Victoria Tiffany

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1955 Filed 11/08/23 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

KESSLER LAW GROUP

Eric W. Kessler, SBN 009158

6720 N. Scottsdale Rd., Ste. 210

Scottsdale, Arizona 85253

(480) 644-0093 phone

(480) 644-0095 fax

Eric.KesslerLaw@gmail.com

FEDER LAW OFFICE PA

Bruce S. Feder, 004832

2930 E. Camelback Rod., Ste. 160

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135 phone

bf@federlawpa.com

Knapp Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, ) No. 2:18-cr-00422-DJH

)

 Plaintiff, ) DEFENDANT SPEARS’ MOTION

v. ) TO WAIVE APPEARANCE AND

) HIS ATTORNEYS’ REQUEST TO

) APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY

)

) Date: September 5, 2023

) Time: 10:30 a.m.

Michael Lacey, et al., )

) (The Hon. Diane J. Humetewa)

Defendant. )

Defendant Scott Spear, through counsel, moves this Court for its Order waiving 

Mr. Spear’s appearance at the September 5, 2023 Status Conference due to his current 

illness.

Additionally, since Mr. Feder and Mr. Kessler sit closest to Mr. Spear and have 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1750 Filed 09/03/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

been side-by-side with him all day since August 29, 2023, Mr. Feder and Mr. Kessler do 

not believe it wise that they appear in Court with the rest of the participants until they 

know that they were not infected by the COVID virus by virtue of their physical proximity 

to Mr. Spear. Mr. Feder and Mr. Kessler respectfully request that they be permitted to 

participate in the September 5, 2023 Status Conference by telephone.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this September 3, 2023.

 s/ Eric W. Kessler 

Eric W. Kessler, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Spear

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 3, 2023, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

 s/ Eric W. Kessler 

Eric W. Kessler, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Spear

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1750 Filed 09/03/23 Page 2 of 2
#### Joseph PALAZZOLO, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 69830.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 15, 1996.

John M. Sehilmoeller, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Breck K. Burgess, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for plaintififrespon-dent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yana Venture Philanthropy Group (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  August 18, 2009                  /s/ Ching-Sang Hong ------------------------------- Ching-Sang Hong, CEO & CFO
```

                                              CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

         The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the duly elected and acting Assistant Treasurer of Southern
California Edison Company, as servicer (the "Servicer") under the Transition Property Servicing Agreement dated as
of December 11, 1997 (the "Servicing Agreement") between the Servicer and SCE Funding LLC (the "Note Issuer") and
further that:

1.       A review of the activities of the Servicer and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement during the
              twelve months ended June 30, 2001 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned pursuant to
              Section 3.03 of the Servicing Agreement; and

2.       To the best of the undersigned's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
              material obligations in all material respects under the Servicing Agreement throughout the twelve
              months ended June 30, 2001, except for those material defaults in the fulfillment of material
              obligations listed on Annex A hereto.

         Executed this 30th day of September, 2001.

                                            SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

                                            By:    Mary Simpson
                                            -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Mary Simpson
                                                   Assistant Treasurer

                                                       ANNEX A
                                                          TO
                                              CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

                                              LIST OF SERVICER DEFAULTS

The following material defaults known to the undersigned occurred during the year ended June 30, 2001.

Nature of Default                                                      Status
-----------------                                                      ------

None
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15996]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Public Information Collection Requirement Submitted to Office of 
Management and Budget for Review

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of information collection.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has submitted 
information collection 3038-0015, Copies of Crop and Market Information 
Reports, to OMB for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-511. The information collected pursuant to this 
rule is in the public interest and is necessary for market 
surveillance.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this information collection 
should contact Jeff Hill, Office of Management and Budget, Room 3228, 
NEOB, Washington, D.C. 20502, (202) 395-7340. Copies of the submission 
are available from Joe F. Mink, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 418-
5170.
    Title: Copies of Crop and Market Information Report.
    Control Number: 3038-0015.
    Action: Extension.
    Respondents: Futures Commission Merchants and Members of contract 
markets.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 5 total hours.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Regulation (17    Estimated number                     Est. avg. hours
       CFR)          of respondents   Annual responses    per response  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.40.............             30                30             0.167    
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, D.C., on June 18th, 1996.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-15996 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patricia Niu, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ PATRICIA NIUPatricia NiuPrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerNovember 15, 2010





This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER,

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES –OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Dr. Roger Crystal, Chief Executive Officer
of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc., certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc.; and



2.   Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.



Date: November 19, 2015



| | By:                           | /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal | 
| | ----------------------------- | --------------------- | 
| | Dr. Roger Crystal             |                      
| | Chief Executive Officer       |                      
| | (Principal Executive Officer) |
#### Allen HEMPHILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 67683.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 5, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Feb. 7, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for Rule 24.035 relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

WILLIAM HARROW,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-14935-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

SCHILLER STORES, INC., d/b/a, Le

Crueset Factory Outlet,

Defendant.

__________________________________/ 

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO IDENTIFY ITS PRINCIPAL

PLACE OF BUSINESS

On November 25, 2008, Plaintiff filed a complaint, alleging claims of age and gender

discrimination under the Michigan Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act (“ELCRA”), Mich. Comp. Laws

§ 37.2101, et seq., and a claim for breach of policy under state law. Plaintiff asserts that this Court

has diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because Plaintiff is a Michigan citizen, Defendant

is a corporation incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in Delaware, see id.

§ 1332(c)(1), and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Id. § 1332(a).

In its answer to the complaint, filed January 12, 2009, Defendant appears to deny that its

principal place of business is in Delaware. However, Defendant does not indicate where its principal

place of business is located. For diversity jurisdiction to exist in this case, Plaintiff and Defendant

must be citizens of different states. Id. § 1332(a)(1). Defendant, as a corporation, is “a citizen of

any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of

business.” Id. § 1332(c)(1). Because “federal courts have an independent obligation to investigate

and police the boundaries of their own jurisdiction,” Douglas v. E.G. Baldwin & Assocs., Inc., 150

1:08-cv-14935-TLL-CEB Doc # 8 Filed 01/14/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 64
-2-

F.3d 604, 607 (6th Cir. 1998), the Court will direct Defendant to identify its principal place of

business.

Accordingly, its is ORDERED that Defendant is DIRECTED to identify, in writing, its

principal place of business on or before January 22, 2009.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: January 14, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on January 14, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cv-14935-TLL-CEB Doc # 8 Filed 01/14/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 65