alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3701 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3701

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                 coastwise trade for each of 4 vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1996

 Mr. Deutsch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                 coastwise trade for each of 4 vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 
289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for each 
of the following vessels:
            (1) RELENTLESS (United States official number 287008).
            (2) TECUMSEH (Canadian Registry number 815298).
            (3) POLICY MAKER III (United States official number 
        569223).
            (4) QUIET SQUAW (United States official number 998717).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16218]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Procedural Change in Payment for Selected RIMS 
Documents

June 20, 1996.
    In an effort to serve the public better and expedite requests for 
doucments, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission today announces a 
procedural change in payment for selected RIMS documents.
    Beginning July 1, 1996, the Commission will begin assessing a 
charge of 15 cents per page for all print requests of 11 or more pages 
from the Commission's electronic Records and Information Management 
System (RIMS) III. This procedural change is consistent with 18 CFR 
388.109(a)(4).
    A charge will be assessed on the number of pages requested from 
RIMS III, not the number of pages actually selected by the user after 
the pages have been printed. This change is being made to improve the 
level of service and reduce the delays and unnecessary burden caused by 
requests for documents and pages that are not required after they have 
been printed.
    Users now have the capability of viewing many documents and 
individual pages before they submit a print request. RIMS III allows 
users to view documents and print selected pages. Since 1994, images of 
selected documents have been available to users for viewing and 
printing at the FERC's Washington Headquarters. All current documents 
(11'' x 17'' and smaller) are now being scanned and are available to 
users at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
    This does not affect the pages printed from RIMS microfilm or 
aperture cards (RIMS II). (Aperture cards are still being made for 
pages larger than 11'' x 17''.) Requests for RIMS pages available only 
on, and printed from, microfilm and/or aperture cards will be handled 
and priced as they have been in the past, since documents cannot be 
viewed prior to being requested.
    Please contact the staff at the Front Desk (202) 208-1371 of the 
Public Reference Room for further information.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16218 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 58 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of iLinc Communications, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report). I, James L.
Dunn, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.





By: /s/ James L. Dunn, Jr.
    ----------------------
James L. Dunn, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
June 29, 2007
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rod A. Shipman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CPC of America, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
company and I have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this reported my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period
covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of
company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
over financial reporting.



March 20, 2006                           /s/  Rod A. Shipman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Rod A. Shipman, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1 04042014






Exhibit 10.1


*** Where this marking appears throughout this Exhibit 10.1, information has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and such information has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission separately.


SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
CRUDE OIL STORAGE SERVICES AGREEMENT


This SECOND AMENDMENT TO CRUDE OIL STORAGE SERVICES AGREEMENT, (the “Second Amendment”) is effective April 1st, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), made by and between BKEP Pipeline, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (the “Operator”) and Vitol, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Customer”), each referred to individually as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Parties previously entered into that certain Crude Oil Storage Services Agreement dated effective June 1st, 2012, (the “Agreement”); and 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement by modifying the provisions of said Agreement relating to Term and Fees. 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 


Term.  The term of the Agreement will be modified and extended with a beginning date of April 1st, 2014 and ending date of March 31st, 2015.   By agreement, the Parties may elect to further extend this Agreement for successive thirty (30) day periods upon ten (10) calendar days notice prior to the end of the Term or each further extension from Customer to Operator which extension shall be deemed agreed upon unless Operator notifies Customer within five (5) days of receipt of such extension request that such request is rejected.     


Monthly Storage Fee.   Commencing on the Effective Date, the monthly storage fee as set forth in Section 4 of the Agreement will change to *** per Barrel of Shell Capacity (the “Monthly Storage”) available for Customer, for a total of ***, regardless of the actual volume of Crude Oil placed in the facility.  


Counterparts.   This Second Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and each of which alone, and all of which together, shall constitute one and the same amendment.  


Effect of Amendment.    This Second Amendment shall be effective as of the Effective Date.   Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all other terms, covenants, and the conditions of the Agreement shall be unaffected by this Second Amendment and shall remain in full force and effect.  











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Second Amendment effective as of the Effective Date above. 




BKEP Pipeline, LLC, a Delaware limited 
liability company 




/s/ Brian L. Melton


Title: Vice President - Pipeline Marketing & Business Development




Vitol, Inc., a Delaware Corporation




/s/ Miguel A. Loya


Title: President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1624

ERICK JHONATHAN CUBIAS-MONTOYA,

 Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 20, 2021 Decided: May 13, 2021

Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anser Ahmad, McLean, Virginia, for Petitioner. Jeffery Bossert Clark, Acting Assistant 

Attorney General, Shelley R. Goad, Assistant Director, Laura Halliday Hickein, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Erick Jhonathan Cubias-Montoya, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to 

reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order 

and find no abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b)(1), (c)(1) (2020). Accordingly, 

we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Cubias-Montoya

(B.I.A. May 20, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Kenneth E. JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66883.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 4, 1995.

Irene C. Earns, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kenneth E. Jones, appeals from a denial by the Circuit Court of the County of Cape Girardeau of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3670

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

through fiscal year 1998, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1996

Mr. SCHAEFER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To extend certain programs under the Energy Policy and

Conservation Act through fiscal year 1998, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT

4 AMENDMENTS.

5 The Energy Policy and Conservation Act is amend6 ed—

7 (1) by amending section 166 (42 U.S.C. 6246)

8 to read as follows:
2

•HR 3670 IH

1 ‘‘AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

2 ‘‘SEC. 166. There are authorized to be appropriated

3 for fiscal years 1996 through 1998 such sums as may be

4 necessary to implement this part.’’;

5 (2) in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by striking

6 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert7 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1998’’; and

8 (3) by adding at the end of section 256(h) (42

9 U.S.C. 6276(h)) ‘‘There are authorized to be appro10 priated for fiscal years 1996 through 1998 such

11 sums as may be necessary to carry out this part.’’;

12 and

13 (4) in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by striking

14 ‘‘June 30, 1996’’ both places it appears and insert15 ing in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30, 1998’’.

16 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON SALE OF STRATEGIC PETROLEUM

17 RESERVES.

18 (a) AMENDMENT TO HOUSE RULES.—Clause 5 of

19 Rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives

20 of the One Hundred Fourth Congress is amended by add21 ing the following new paragraph at the end:

22 ‘‘(e) No bill or joint resolution, amendment, or con23 ference report authorizing a sale from the Strategic Petro24 leum Reserve other than as provided in section 161(d)(1),

25 (g)(1), and (h)(1) of the Energy Policy and Conservation
3

•HR 3670 IH

1 Act (42 U.S.C. 6241) shall be considered as passed or

2 agreed to unless so determined by a vote of not less than

3 three-fifths of the Members voting.’’.

4 (b) EXERCISE OF CONGRESSIONAL RULEMAKING

5 POWER.—This section is enacted by Congress—

6 (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of

7 the House of Representatives and as such paragraph

8 (e) of clause 5 of Rule XXI of the Rules of the

9 House of Representatives of the One Hundred

10 Fourth Congress shall be considered a part of the

11 rules of the House of Representatives and such rules

12 shall supersede other rules only to the extent that

13 they are inconsistent therewith; and

14 (2) with full recognition of the constitutional

15 right of the House of Representatives to change

16 such rules at any time in the same manner and to

17 the same extent as in the case of any other rule of

18 such House.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sawadee Ventures (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas E. Ford,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Douglas E. Ford
------------------------------------
Douglas E. Ford
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered June 9, 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01526

- CV

JOHNNY SPENCER, Appellant

V.

DALLAS CENTRAL APPRA ISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from th e Dummy Number

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No.



### O RDER

We DENY appellant’s motion to stay the mandate.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THAL FLAM WENDROW, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 08-14324

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

HUMAN SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR STAY

Before the court are two motions to stay proceedings pending appeal, filed by the

Michigan Department of Human Services defendants and the Walled Lake Consolidated School

District defendants. These defendants are appealing the court’s orders of March 30, 2011, and

March 27, 2012, in which the court denied qualified immunity on certain claims. 

Having considered the motions and Plaintiffs’ response, the court is persuaded that it is in

the interest of justice, judicial economy, and efficiency to stay the entire matter pending appeal. 

See, e.g., Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936) (“[T]he power to stay

proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the

causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.”). 

Otherwise, the court and the parties will be in the position of trying a complex and potentially

lengthy case twice. The court understands Plaintiffs’ concern regarding delay; on balance,

however, the court finds multiple, expensive and time-consuming trials to be the greater harm for

5:08-cv-14324-JCO-DAS Doc # 331 Filed 07/09/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 11782
-2-

all involved.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motions to stay proceedings

pending appeal [docket nos. 322 and 323] are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Oakland County and David Gorcyca’s

motion to adjourn trial [docket no. 330] is DENIED AS MOOT. 

s/John Corbett O'Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: July 9, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on this date, July 9, 2012, using the ECF system.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager

5:08-cv-14324-JCO-DAS Doc # 331 Filed 07/09/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 11783
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAUL MICHELIN
, Appellant,

v.

LOUISA MICHELIN
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2474

[ April 4, 2019 ]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jessica Ticktin , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502014DR004885XXXXSB

.

Kerry Loomis of Law Office of Loomis & Loomis, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Christopher J. Perez

- Gurri and Alan G. Geffin of GPG Law, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Aff irmed.

T

AYLOR

, C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0548

CITY OF KALISPELL,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATHAN RAY WARNER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant

and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 12 2023

12/12/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0548