alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRAINTECH, INC.,

Plaintiff

vs Case No: 09-10454

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

ADIL SHAFI,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,

vs

FREDERICK WEIDINGER,

Counter-Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER

On July 1, 2009, the Court held a Scheduling Conference. Attending were Mary

Deon and James Vande Wyndearde representing Plaintiff Braintech and CounterDefendant Weidinger and James Murphy representing Defendant/Counter Plaintiff

Shafi.

Based on the discussion held, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's and Third Party

Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #14) is deemed WITHDRAWN. However, Third

Party Plaintiff is to file an Amended Complaint by July 22, 2009, which makes clear Mr.

Weidinger is not being sued for breach of contract and which pleads with more

particularity, fraud and claims under the Michigan Uniform Securities Act and The

Exchange Act.

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 17 Filed 07/06/09 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant and Third party Defendant are cautioned not to file

motions styled as FRCP 12(b)(6) motions, which rely on documents outside of the

pleadings and which require the Court to resolve genuine issues of fact, while

discovery is ongoing.

IT IS ORDERED.

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: July 6, 2009

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

July 6, 2009.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 17 Filed 07/06/09 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Notes of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following agreement(s) has been filed with the Commission pursuant to 
section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, and section 5 of the Shipping Act 
of 1984.
    Interested parties may inspect and obtain a copy of each agreement 
of the Washington, D.C. office of the Federal Maritime Commission, 800 
North Capitol Street, N.W., 9th Floor. Interested parties may submit 
protests or comments on each agreement to the Secretary, Federal 
Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573, within 10 days after the 
date of the Federal Register in which this notice appears. The 
requirements for comments and protests are found in section 560.602 
and/or 572.603 of Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 
Interested persons should consult this section before communicating 
with the Commission regarding a pending agreement.
    Any person filing a comment or protest with the Commission shall, 
at the same time, deliver a copy of the document to the person filing 
the agreement at the address shown below.
    Agreement No.: 224-200969-001.
    Title: Port of Houston/Mediterranean Shipping Co., S.A., Terminal 
Agreement.
    Parties: Port of Houston Authority (Port), Mediterranean Shipping 
Co., S.A. (``MSC'').
    Filing Agent: Martha T. Williams, Esquire, Port of Houston 
Authority, P.O. Box 2562, Houston, TX 77252-2562.
    Synopsis: The proposed amendment permits MSC to relocate its South 
American service cargo operations to the Port's Fentress Bracewell 
Barbours Cut Terminal.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: June 28, 1996.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-17057 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
**Exhibit 15.4**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Arcelor S.A.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-107102 on Form S-8 of Mittal Steel Company N.V. (“Mittal”) of ourreport dated April 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Arcelor S.A. and subsidiaries (“the Group”) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated income statement, statement of cash flows, and statement ofchanges in shareholders’ equity for the five months ended December 31, 2006, prepared in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as adopted by the European Union, which report appears in the December 31,2006 annual report on Form 20-F/A of Mittal. 

Our qualified report dated April 16, 2007 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the following:

IAS 34 requires that interim financial statements be represented with comparative financial information. These consolidated interim financial statementshave been prepared solely for the purposes of consolidating the Group into the consolidated financial statements of Mittal as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Accordingly, no comparative financial information is presented. 

Our report dated April 16, 2007 also contains the following explanatory paragraph: 

The consolidated financial statements are based on the historical values of Arcelor S.A.’s assets and liabilities prior to its acquisition by Mittal and, accordingly, do not include the purchase price adjustments to such amountsreflected in the consolidated financial statements of Mittal as a result of such acquisition. 

/s/ **KPMG Audit S. à r.l.**

City of Luxembourg 

Luxembourg 

July 3, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

TDC INTERNATIONAL CORP.

f/k/a G.E. THOMPSON DEVELOPMENT CORP.,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 08-14792

JAE L. BURNHAM, d/b/a QUICK AND 

EASY MOVING, AND QUICK AND EASY

MOVING, LLC, 

Defendants.

 /

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

On July 31, 2019, the court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should 

not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 76.) Plaintiff did not file a response 

on the docket to this order; however, Plaintiff informed the court via email that it no 

longer wishes to prosecute this case. The court recognizes that Defendant’s continued 

failure to comply with this court’s orders have made the prosecution of this case 

extremely difficult. With the exception of his compliance with the court’s most recent 

order, Defendant has demonstrated continued recalcitrance throughout the decade-long 

history of this case. The court has sanctioned Defendant multiple times, yet he has 

actively attempted to evade compliance with the court’s sanctions for years. The court 

comments on Defendant's behavior to make clear that the dismissal of this case is not 

mistaken for the court excusing or condoning Defendant’s conduct. However, the court 

is keenly aware that the costs Plaintiff will incur in further prosecution are likely to far 

surpass any payment that it may hope extract from Defendant. Accordingly, based on 

Case 2:08-cv-14792-RHC-MKM ECF No. 77 filed 08/15/19 PageID.729 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff’s representations to the court and its failure to file a response to the order to 

show cause,

IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. 

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: August 15, 2019

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record 

on this date, August 15, 2019, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

s/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(810) 292-6522

S:\Cleland\Cleland\HEK\Civil\08-14792.TDC.dismissal.HEK.2.docx

Case 2:08-cv-14792-RHC-MKM ECF No. 77 filed 08/15/19 PageID.730 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tara Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Francis Richard Biscan, Jr., the President and Chief Executive Officer and Clifford A. Brown, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.   TARA MINERALS CORP.    By:   /s/ Francis Richard Biscan Jr. Francis Richard Biscan, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer    By:   /s/ Clifford A. Brown Clifford A. Brown, Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



     As independent auditors, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report, dated February 8, 2002, which includes an emphasis
paragraph relating to uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern, relating to the financial statements of Commonwealth
Biotechnologies, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, included
in the 2001 Annual Report to Shareholders and incorporated by reference into the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, into the Company's previously filed Form S-8
Registration Statement, File No. 333-51074, and Form S-3 Registration Statement
No. 333-51078.




Richmond, Virginia
March 29, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

Scott Spear, )

)

Defendant. )

)

)

NO. CR18-00422 PHX SMB-003

ORDER

THIS COURT, having considered Defendant Spear’s Motion to Modify his

Conditions of Release, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant Spear’s Motion to Modify his

Conditions of Release (Docket _____);

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED modifying Defendant Spear’s release

conditions to reflect the removal of the condition requiring Mr. Spear to maintain or

actively seek verifiable employment and provide proof of such to Pretrial Services.

DATED this _____ day of __________, 2020.

______________________________________

THE HONORABLE SUSAN M. BRNOVICH

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1043-1 Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 1
Modification to Terms of Employment for Joseph J. Troy



 Exhibit 10.2 

Modification to Terms of Employment for Joseph J. Troy 

March 27, 2014 
 Dear Joe: 

The following will modify your Employment Agreement dated July 16, 2010, as amended pursuant to a letter agreement dated
December 30, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”) with Quality Distribution, Inc. (the “Company) effective as of March 3, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). 

 

	 	1.	Section 3.1 is amended substituting the following for the first sentence thereof: 

 As
compensation for all services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the Company agrees to pay to the Executive during the Term a base salary, payable bi-weekly, at the annual rate of $300,000 (the “Base Salary”). 

 

	 	2.	Section 3.2 is amended substituting the following for the second sentence thereof: 

 At
target, Employee’s annual cash bonus opportunity shall be 60% of Base Salary. 
  

	 	3.	Section 3 is amended by inserting a new Section 3.4, and renumbering the prior Section 3.4 and the remaining sections (and references thereto) accordingly: 


Annual Equity Award. The Executive shall be eligible at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, to receive an annual equity
award, at target, equal to 125% of Executive’s base salary compensation. The Executive’s annual equity award, if any, shall be made at the same time as annual equity awards are normally made to similarly situated employees of the Company,
pursuant to the Quality Distribution, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Plan”). 
 The Company requests your
signature and your subsequent delivery of this letter agreement to the Company to evidence confirmation of your understanding of, and agreement to, the above-described changes to the terms of your employment as of the Effective Date. Except as set
forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
  

			
	QUALITY DISTRIBUTION, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gary R. Enzor

		 	Gary R. Enzor
		 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	Agreed to and accepted as of the date first written above.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph J. Troy

		 	Joseph J. Troy
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15004]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[OR-050-1020-00: GP6-0183]


Notice of Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council

agency: Bureau of Land Management, Prineville District.

action: Meeting of John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council; Lewiston, 
Idaho; July 22-24, 1996.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: A meeting of the John Day-Snake Resource Advisory Council will 
be held on July 22, 1996, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. and on July 24, 1996 
from 8 a.m. to 12:00 noon at the Ramada Inn, 621 21st Street, Lewiston, 
Idaho 83501. Public comments will be received from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. on 
Monday, July 22, 1996. Topics to be discussed are the Interior Columbia 
Basin Ecosystem Management Project and standards for rangeland health 
and guidelines for livestock grazing on the public lands. On July 23, 
the council will view noxious weed infestations on public and private 
land in the Snake River Canyon. The entire meeting is open to the 
public; however, transportation into the Snake River Canyon will not be 
provided to the public.

for further information, contact: James L. Hancock, Bureau of Land 
Management, Prineville District Office, 3050 NE Third Street, 
Prineville, Oregon 97754 or call 541-416-6700.

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
James L. Hancock,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-15004 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-10174 Conference Calendar

CARL V. LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus C. TONY WRIGHT, attorney at law; JOHN H. JACKSON, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:03-CV-2697-D

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Carl V. Long, Texas prisoner #1001354, has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and § 1915A(b). By moving for IFP, Long is challenging the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be granted on appeal United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 22, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-10174 -2- because his appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Long does not address the district court’s reason for dismissing his claims against C. Tony Wright, namely that Wright is not a state actor. He also presents no nonfrivolous issue for appeal with respect to his claim against Judge John Jackson. “[L]itigants may not obtain review of state court actions by filing complaints about those actions in lower federal courts cast in the form of civil rights suits.” Hale v. Harney , 786 F.2d 688, 691 (5th Cir. 1986). Moreover, the relief Long sought was in the nature of mandamus relief. Federal courts have no power to direct state judicial officials in the performance of their functions. See Moye v. Clerk, DeKalb County Superior
Court , 474 F.2d 1275, 1276 (5th Cir. 1973). Accordingly, we uphold the district court’s certification that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues. Long’s motion for IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See Baugh , 117 F.3d at 202 and n.24; 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Both the district court’s dismissal of Long’s complaint and this court’s dismissal of this appeal count as “strikes” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Long that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained inNo. 04-10174 -3- any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-3 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 355
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-3 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 356
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1139 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into a property conveyance 

with the city of Wallowa, Oregon, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into a property conveyance with the city of Wallowa, Oregon, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wallowa Forest Service 

5 Compound Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO CITY OF WALLOWA, OREGON. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

8 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of 

9 Wallowa, Oregon. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1139 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

3 (3) WALLOWA FOREST SERVICE COMPOUND.— 

4 The term ‘‘Wallowa Forest Service Compound’’ 

5 means the Wallowa Ranger Station that is— 

6 (A) located at 602 West First Street, 

7 Wallowa, Oregon; and 

8 (B) under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. 

9 (b) DUTY OF SECRETARY.—As soon as practicable 

10 after the date of enactment of this Act, subject to valid 

11 existing rights, the Secretary shall convey to the City, 

12 without consideration and by quitclaim deed, all right, 

13 title, and interest of the United States, except as provided 

14 in subsections (c) and (d), in and to the Wallowa Forest 

15 Service Compound. 

16 (c) USE OF WALLOWA FOREST SERVICE COM17 POUND.—As a condition of the conveyance under sub18 section (b), the City shall— 

19 (1) use the Wallowa Forest Service Compound 

20 as an interpretive center; 

21 (2) ensure that the Wallowa Forest Service 

22 Compound is managed by a nonprofit entity; and 

23 (3) agree to manage the Wallowa Forest Serv24 ice Compound— 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•S 1139 IS

1 (A) with due consideration and protection 

2 for the historic values of the Wallowa Forest 

3 Service Compound; and 

4 (B) in accordance with such terms and 

5 conditions as are agreed to by the Secretary 

6 and the City. 

7 (d) REVERSION.—In the quitclaim deed to the City, 

8 the Secretary shall provide that the Wallowa Forest Serv9 ice Compound shall revert to the Secretary, at the election 

10 of the Secretary, if the Wallowa Forest Service Compound 

11 is— 

12 (1) used for a purpose other than the purposes 

13 described in subsection (c)(1); or 

14 (2) managed by the City in a manner that is 

15 inconsistent with subsection (c)(3). 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1184 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit employers to pay 

higher wages to their employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. 

BUNNING, Mr. ENZI, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to permit 

employers to pay higher wages to their employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rewarding Achieve5 ment and Incentivizing Successful Employees Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RAISE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF HIGHER WAGES. 

8 Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

9 U.S.C. 159(a)) is amended— 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1184 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding a labor organization’s exclusive 

4 representation of employees in a unit, or the terms and 

5 conditions of any collective bargaining contract or agree6 ment then in effect, nothing in either— 

7 ‘‘(A) section 8(a)(1) or 8(a)(5), or 

8 ‘‘(B) a collective bargaining contract or agree9 ment renewed or entered into after the date of en10 actment of the RAISE Act, 

11 shall prohibit an employer from paying an employee in the 

12 unit greater wages, pay, or other compensation for, or by 

13 reason of, his or her services as an employee of such em14 ployer, than provided for in such contract or agreement.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert L. Nichols, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sun American Bancorp; and

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: May 1, 2006

| |                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                        
| | /s/ ROBERTL. NICHOLS                                                   
| | Robert L. Nichols
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)