32322 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 122 / Monday, June 24, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 17,

1996.

James V. Devany,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 96–15957 Filed 6–21–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96–ASO–3]

Establishment of Class E Airspace;

Chiefland, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment establishes

Class E airspace at Chiefland, FL. A

White Farms Airport at Chiefland, FL,

has a VOR/DME–A Standard Instrument

Approach Procedure (SIAP). Controlled

airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface (AGL) is needed

to accommodate this SIAP and for

instrument flight rules (IFR) operations

at the airport. The operating status of

the airport will change from VFR to

include IFR operations concurrent with

publication of this SIAP.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15,

1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Benny L. McGlamery, Operations

Branch, Air Traffic Division, Federal

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;

telephone (404) 305–5570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On April 16, 1996, the FAA proposed

to amend Part 71 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 71) by

establishing Class E airspace at

Chiefland, FL, (61 FR 16621). This

action will provide adequate Class E

airspace for IFR operations at White

Farms Airport.

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received. Designations for Class E

airspace extending upward from 700

feet or more above the surface are

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995,

and effective September 16, 1995. The

Class E airspace designation listed in

this document will be published

subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to Part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) establishes Class E airspace at

Chiefland, FL, to accommodate a VOR/

DME–A SIAP and for IFR operations at

White Farms Airport. The operating

status of the airport will be changed

from VFR to include IFR operations

concurrent with publication of this

SIAP.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,

40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet above the

surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASO FL E5 Chiefland, FL [New]

Chiefland White Farms Airport, FL

(Lat. 29°30′45′′N, long. 82°52′30′′W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile

radius of White Farms Airport, excluding

that airspace within the Cross City, FL, Class

E airspace area.

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 5,

1996.

Benny L. McGlamery,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 96–15984 Filed 6–21–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96–ASO–9]

Establishment of Class E Airspace;

Dawson, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment establishes

Class E airspace at Dawson, GA. A VOR/

DME RWY 31 Standard Instrument

Approach Procedure (SIAP) has been

developed for Dawson Municipal

Airport. Controlled airspace extending

upward from 700 feet above the surface

(AGL) is needed to accommodate this

SIAP and for instrument flight rules

(IFR) operations at the airport. The

operating status of the airport will

change from VFR to include IFR

operations concurrent with publication

of this SIAP.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15,

1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Benny L. McGlamery, Operations

Branch, Air Traffic Division, Federal

Aviation Administration, P.O. Box

20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320;

telephone (404) 305–5570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On April 8, 1996, the FAA proposed

to amend Part 71 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR Part 71) by

establishing Class E airspace at Dawson,

GA, (61 FR 15434). This action will

provide adequate Class E airspace for

IFR operations at Dawson Municipal

Airport.

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received. Designations for Class E

airspace extending upward from 700

feet or more above the surface are

published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995,

and effective September 16, 1995. The

Class E airspace designation listed in

this document will be published

subsequently in the Order.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 122 / Monday, June 24, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 32323

1 15 U.S.C. 6101–08.

2Citations to the CEA in this notice refer to the

Commodity Exchange Act, codified at 7 U.S.C. 1 et

seq. (1994).

3Citations to ‘‘Commission Regulations’’ or

‘‘CFTC Regulations’’ refer to the CFTC’s regulations,

codified at 17 CFR 1.1. et seq.

4Section 17 of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 21, requires the

CFTC to review and approve the rules of registered

futures associations, which have explicit selfregulatory obligations under the CEA and

Commission Regulations. To date, NFA, which

began operations in 1982, is the only registered

futures association.

5 60 FR 43842 (August 23, 1995).

6H.R. Rep. No. 20, 103d Cong., 1st Sess. at 1

(1993).

7See Section 6(f) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 9b. The

Telemarketing Act similarly requires the Securities

and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) to promulgate

telemarketing rules within the same time frame

unless it determines: (1) that federal securities laws

or SEC rules provide substantially similar

protection; or (2) that SEC telemarketing rules

would not be necessary or appropriate in the public

interest, or would be inconsistent with the

maintenance of fair and orderly markets. See

Section 3(d) of the Telemarketing Act, 15 U.S.C.

6102(d).

The Rule

This amendment to Part 71 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 71) establishes Class E airspace at

Dawson, GA, to accommodate a VOR/

DME RWY 31 SIAP and for IFR

operations at Dawson Municipal

Airport. The operating status of the

airport will be changed from VRF to

include IFR operations concurrent with

publication of this SIAP.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore, (1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

Part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,

40120; EO 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet above the

surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASO GA E5 Dawson, GA [New]

Dawson Municipal Airport, GA

(Lat. 31°44’46’’N, long. 84°25’30’’W)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile

radius of Dawson Municipal Airport.

* * * * *

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on June 5,

1996.

Benny L. McGlamery,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southern Region.

[FR Doc. 96–15983 Filed 6–21–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING

COMMISSION

16 CFR Chapter I

Determination Concerning

Telemarketing Rules

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading

Commission.

ACTION: Notice of determination that

existing Commodity Exchange Act

provisions, Commission Regulations,

and National Futures Association

(‘‘NFA’’) rules provide protection from

abusive and deceptive telemarketing

practices ‘‘substantially similar’’ to that

provided by the Federal Trade

Commission’s recently promulgated

telemarketing rule.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to its obligations

under section 3(e) of the Telemarketing

and Consumer Fraud and Abuse

Prevention Act (‘‘Telemarketing Act’’),1

15 U.S.C. 6102(e), and corresponding

section 6(f) of the Commodity Exchange

Act (‘‘CEA’’),2 7 U.S.C. 9b, the

Commodity Futures Trading

Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or

‘‘CFTC’’) hereby provides notice of its

determination that existing CEA

provisions, Commission Regulations

under the CEA,3 and CFTC-approved

NFA rules,4 interpretations, and other

requirements in the area of

telemarketing, provide protection from

deceptive and abusive telemarketing

practices ‘‘substantially similar’’ to that

provided by the Federal Trade

Commission’s (‘‘FTC’s’’) recently

promulgated Telemarketing Sales Rule,

16 CFR Part 310 (Prohibition of

Deceptive and Abusive Telemarketing

Acts).5 Accordingly, the CFTC will not

promulgate additional rules under the

Telemarketing Act at this time.

Background information and a

discussion of the basis for the CFTC’s

determination that existing provisions

of its regulations and enabling statute,

together with NFA telemarketing

requirements, provide protection against

deceptive and abusive telemarketing

acts and practices substantially similar

to that provided by the FTC’s rule are

set forth below.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 24, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy L. Walsh, Attorney, Division of

Enforcement, Commodity Futures

Trading Commission, Three Lafayette

Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW,

Washington, D.C. 20581. Telephone:

(202) 418–5330.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. The Telemarketing Act

The Telemarketing Act, signed into

law on August 16, 1994, ‘‘to strengthen

the authority of the Federal Trade

Commission to protect consumers in

connection with sales made with a

telephone, and for other purposes,’’ 6

required that the FTC adopt rules

prohibiting deceptive and abusive

telemarketing practices. As discussed

below, the Telemarketing Act also

added a new Section 6(f) to the CEA, 7

U.S.C. 9b, which requires, subject to

certain exceptions, that the CFTC

‘‘promulgate, or require each registered

futures association to promulgate, rules

substantially similar’’ to the FTC’s

telemarketing rules within six months of

the effective date of the FTC rules.7

A. Congressional Findings

In imposing rulemaking and other

obligations on the FTC, the CFTC, and

the SEC, the Telemarketing Act lists the

following Congressional findings: (1)

That telemarketing differs from other

sales activities given sellers’ mobility

and ability to make sales across state

lines without direct contact with

consumers; (2) that interstate

telemarketing fraud is a problem of such

magnitude that FTC resources are