alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB

Union Calendar No. 425

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3676

[Report No. 104–787]

To amend title 18, United States Code, clarify the intent of Congress with

respect to the Federal carjacking prohibition.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 19, 1996

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 16, 1996

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, clarify the intent

of Congress with respect to the Federal carjacking prohibition.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carjacking Correction

5 Act of 1996’’.
2

•HR 3676 RH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF INTENT OF CONGRESS IN FED2 ERAL CARJACKING PROHIBITION.

3 Section 2119(2) of title 18, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking ‘‘(as defined in section 1365 of this

5 title)’’ and inserting ‘‘(which, for the purpose of this sec6 tion shall have the meaning given that term in section

7 1365 of this title and also include any sexual act, as de8 fined in section 2246 of this title)’’.

9 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

10 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Carjacking Correction

11 Act of 1996’’.

12 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF INTENT OF CONGRESS IN FED13 ERAL CARJACKING PROHIBITION.

14 Section 2119(2) of title 18, United States Code, is

15 amended by inserting ‘‘, including any conduct that, if the

16 conduct occurred in the special maritime and territorial ju17 risdiction of the United States, would violate section 2241

18 or 2242 of this title’’ after (as defined in section 1365 of

19 this title’’.

Union Calendar No. 425

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3676

[Report No. 104–787]

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, clarify the

carjacking prohibition.intent of Congress with respect to the Federal

SEPTEMBER 16, 1996

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEFFREY Z. BRYANT,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-CV-10318 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

MICHAEL ASTRUE, 

COMMISSIONER OF 

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION (#16); DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (# 15); GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (# 10), AND REMANDING TO THE ALJ

This matter is before the court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment

as to plaintiff Jeffrey Z. Bryant’s claim for judicial review of defendant Commissioner of

Social Security's denial of his August 12, 2005 application for disability insurance benefits,

as well as his August 31, 2005 application for supplemental security income. The matter

was referred to Magistrate Judge Mona Majzoub. On February 3, 2010, Magistrate Judge

Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that defendant's motion for

summary judgment be denied, and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment be granted

to the extent this matter should be remanded to the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"). 

Specifically, Magistrate Judge Majzoub recommends remanding to the ALJ to

assess plaintiff’s credibility with regard to his complaints of fatigue. The ALJ’s credibility

determination regarding plaintiff’s fatigue is not supported by substantial evidence, so it is

not possible to determine whether the hypothetical question posed to the VE was accurate
2

and whether the ALJ’s findings at step five are supported by substantial evidence. The ALJ

must perform a new step four determination and, if necessary, step five determination and

include those limitations he finds credible and supported by the record. Magistrate Majzoub

thus finds that remand is warranted on the record as opposed to an immediate award of

benefits. See Faucher v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17 F.3d 171, 176 (6th

Cir. 1994) ("If a court determines that substantial evidence does not support the Secretary's

decision, the court can reverse the decision and immediately award benefits only if all

essential factual issues have been resolved and the record adequately establishes a

plaintiff's entitlement to benefits"). No party has filed timely objections to the Report and

Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d)(2).

Having reviewed the record and Report and Recommendation, and in the absence

of timely objections, the court hereby ACCEPTS Magistrate Judge Majzoub's well reasoned

Report and Recommendation as its own. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is

hereby DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED to the

extent this matter is hereby REMANDED to the ALJ for further proceedings as outlined in

the Report and Recommendation.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2010

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

February 23, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk
Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc.




Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Wang Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.








Dated this 17th day of September, 2009./s/ Wang Hui
Wang Hui, Director and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Case No. 08-20024

v. Hon. Sean F. Cox

GEORGE FOUSHI,

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

SECOND AMENDED TRAVEL ORDER

Pursuant to 18 USC 4285, it is hereby ordered that the United States Marshal’s Service

provided non-custodial transportation for George Foushi from Tucson, Arizona to Detroit,

Michigan and then back to Tucson, Arizona. He must appear before this Court on July 7, 2009

at 3:00 p.m.

So Ordered.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox United States District Judge

Dated: June 15, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on June 15, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager

Case 2:08-cr-20024-SFC-RSW ECF No. 43, PageID.99 Filed 06/15/09 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Roderick Bartlett, President, Chief Executive Officer of TransAct Energy Corp., (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2022 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: July 14, 2022

 

*/s/ Rod Bartlett*

Roderick Bartlett

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to TransAct Energy Corp. and will be retained by TransAct Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10376

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS CRUZ, also known as Cruzito,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-236-3

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Cruz has moved for leave to 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10376 Document: 00513427595 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2016
No. 15-10376

2

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Cruz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH 

CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10376 Document: 00513427595 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/17/2016
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-1 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3354
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-1 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3355
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

HUSSEIN HASSAN HASSAN, 

 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-10347 

 Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

v. 

ADP, INC. and DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE 

OFFICER DUDLEY #72, an individual, 

jointly and severally, 

 Defendants. 

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

 The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, having stipulated to the dismissal 

of this case with prejudice, and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including all claims and counterclaims that 

were brought, or that could have been brought, related to the allegations made in this action, is 

dismissed with prejudice and with all parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Patrick J. Duggan

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: October 20, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record 

on October 20, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 s/Marilyn Orem

 Case Manager 

2:09-cv-10347-PJD-MKM Doc # 45 Filed 10/20/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 395
2

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE: 

FRANK G. BECKER PC 

/s/Frank G. Becker (w/consent)_____________ 

Frank G. Becker (P25502) 

18501 W. 10 Mile Road 

Southfield, Michigan 48075 

(248) 569-6925 

frankgbecker@yahoo.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

BUTZEL LONG 

/s/Katherine Donohue Goudie_______ 

Katherine Donohue Goudie (P62806) 

150 West Jefferson, Suite 100 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 

(313) 225-7000 

goudie@butzel.com 

Attorney for Defendant ADP, Inc. 

2:09-cv-10347-PJD-MKM Doc # 45 Filed 10/20/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 396
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

GREGORY HOXIE, Case No: 09-cv-10725 

 Plaintiff, Hon. George Caram Steeh 

 Magistrate Judge: Mona K. Majzoub 

v. 

LIVINGSTON COUNTY, ET AL, 

 Defendants 

Grant W. Parsons (P38214) CHAPMAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. 

Jennifer R. Berry (P67665) Ronald W. Chapman (P37603) 

Parsons Rinsmuth, PLC Carly Van Thomme (P59706) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

520 W. Union, P.O. Box 1710 Sheryl Simpson, D.O., Only 

Traverse City, MI 49685-1710 40950 N. Woodward Avenue, Suite 120 

(231) 929-3113 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 

(231) 929-3113 (248) 644-6326 

info@parsonsringsmuth.com rchapman@chapmanlawfirmpc.com

jberry@parsonsringsmuth.com cvanthomme@chapmanlawfirmpc.com

T. Joseph Seward (P35095) 

Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Livingston County, Robert Bezotte 

Michael J. Murphy, Thomas Cremonte, 

Matthew Hoffman, Matthew Young, 

Cheryl Miks, Nichole Otten, Kasey Howe, 

Gerard Boyer, York, Barry, Michael Cortez, 

Jason Davis, Kirk Daniels, Dep. Jackson 

33900 Schoolcraft, Suite G-1 

Livonia, MI 48150-1392 

(734) 261-2400 

tjseward@cmda-law.com

QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER PURSUANT TO HIPAA
2

At a session of said Court held in the 

United States Courthouse, 

City of Detroit, State of Michigan 

on September 27, 2010 

PRESENT: HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 This matter having come before the Court on Defendant Sheryl Simpson, D.O.’s Motion 

for Qualified Protective Order Pursuant to HIPAA, and the Court being otherwise fully advised 

in the premises; 

 NOW, THEREFORE: 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s examining, testing and/or treating doctors, 

nurses and other medical personnel may discuss the Plaintiff’s medical conditions and treatment 

with counsel for Defendant; however, the decision to do so lies with the doctors, nurses and other 

medical personnel and is not compelled by this order. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Defendant is prohibited from using any 

such discussed or provided health care information for any purpose other than as a part of the 

present litigation. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon completion of the present litigation, counsel for 

Defendant shall destroy any copies of any documentary health care information received from 

any health care provider pursuant to this Order and any original materials shall be returned to the 

provider. 

 S/George Caram Steeh 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: September 27, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ELMER SHAMBA STALLINGS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 08-cv-13987

HON. PATRICK J. DUGGAN

MARY BERGHUIS,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on this date finding no merit to

the claims asserted in Petitioner’s application for the writ of habeas corpus,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

 

DATE: March 5, 2010 s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Elmer Shamba Stallings, #580708

Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility

2500 S. Sheridan Drive

Muskegon, MI 49444

Debra M. Gagliardi, Esq.