33372 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 125 / Thursday, June 27, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

43. Stratford Fireworks

Date: July 3, 1996

Time: 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Location: Short Beach, Stratford, CT, Lat:

41°09′30′′ N

Long: 073°06′2′′ W (NAD 1983)

44. Subfest Fireworks

Date: July 4, 1996

Rain Date: July 5, 1996

Time: 9:30 p.m. to 9:50 p.m.

Location: Thames River, Groton, CT, Lat:

41°23′13′′ N Long:

072°05′15′′ W (NAD 1983)

45. Summer Music Fireworks

Date: July 20, Aug 1, and Aug 24, 1996

Time: 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Location: Niantic River, Harkness Park,

Waterford, CT, Lat: 41°18′00′′ N Long:

072°06′40′′ W (NAD 1983)

46. Taste of Italy

Date: September 7, 1996

Rain Date: September 8, 1996

Time: 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Location: Norwich Harbor, off Norwich

Marina, Norwich, CT,

Lat: 41°31′20′′ N Long: 072°04′83′′ W (NAD

1983)

47. Thames River Fireworks

Date: July 13, 1996

Time: 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

Location: Thames River, off Electric Boat,

Groton, CT, Lat: 41°21′00′′ N Long:

072°05′20′′ W (NAD 1983)

48. Tiverton Waterfront Festival

Date: June 30, 1996

Time: 10:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

Location: Grinnel’s Beach, Sakonnet River,

Tiverton, RI

49. Town of Babylon Fireworks

Date: July 4, 1996

Rain Date: July 5, 1996

Time: 9:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.

Location: Nezeras Island, Babylon, NY, Lat:

40°40′30′′ N

Long: 073°19′30′′ W (NAD 1983)

50. Town of Barnstable Fireworks

Date: July 4, 1996

Time: 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Location: Dunbar Point/Kalmus Beach,

Barnstable, MA

52. Walsh’s Fireworks

Date: July 4, 1996

Time: 9:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Location: Union River Bay, ME

53. Wellfleet Fireworks

Date: July 6, 1996

Time: 8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Location: Indian Neck Jetty, Wellfleet, MA

54. Westport P.A.L. Fireworks, Westport, CT

Date: July 3, 1996

Rain Date: July 5, 1996

Time: 10:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

Location: Compo Beach, Westport, CT

55. Weymouth 4th of July Fireworks

Date: July 3, 1996

Time: 8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Location: Weymouth Fore River, Weymouth,

MA

56. Yampol Family Fireworks

Date: July 6, 1996

Time: 8:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Location: Barons Cove, Sag Harbor, NY

Dated: June 21, 1996.

J.L. Linnon,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,

First Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. 96–16490 Filed 6–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[GA–30–3–9615a; FRL–5519–2]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Approval of

Revisions to the State Implementation

Plan; Georgia

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: This action approves a

revision to the Georgia State

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by

the Georgia Department of Natural

Resources, Environmental Protection

Division (GA EPD) on November 15,

1994, for the purpose of deleting the

volatile organic compound (VOC)

reasonably available control technology

(RACT) rule for Perchloroethylene Dry

Cleaners. This SIP revision is consistent

with requirements of the Clean Air Act

as amended in 1990 (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective August

26, 1996 unless adverse or critical

comments are received by July 29, 1996.

If the effective date is delayed, timely

notice will be published in the Federal

Register.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Scott M.

Martin at the EPA Regional Office listed

below.

Copies of the documents relative to

this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the following locations. The

interested persons wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least 24 hours before the visiting day.

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4 Air Programs Branch, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365.

Air Protection Branch, Georgia

Environmental Protection Division,

Georgia Department of Natural

Resources, 4244 International

Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia

30354.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott M. Martin, Regulatory Planning

and Development Section, Air Programs

Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics

Management Division, Region 4

Environmental Protection Agency, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365. The telephone number is 404/

347–3555, X4216. Reference file GA–

30–3–9615.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

November 15, 1994, the State of Georgia

through the Georgia Environmental

Protection Division submitted SIP

revisions to EPA Region 4. This

submittal contains changes pursuant to

requirements of part D of Title I of the

CAA with regard to nonattainment

areas.

Specifically, Georgia submitted, and

EPA is approving, the deletion of

Subsection 391–3–1–.02(2)(ww),

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners, in its

entirety.

This revision is pursuant to the

publication of a Federal Register notice

on February 7, 1996, (61 FR 4588) in

which EPA adds perchloroethylene, also

known as tetrachloroethylene, to the list

of compounds excluded from the

definition of VOC. The effective date of

this rule is March 8, 1996.

Perchloroethylene is a solvent

commonly used in dry cleaning,

maskant operations, and degreasing

operations. This rule results in a more

accurate assessment of ozone formation

potential and will assist States in

avoiding exceedances for the ozone

health standard. The rule does this by

causing control efforts to focus on

compounds which are actual ozone

precursors, rather than giving credit for

control of a compound which has

negligible photochemical reactivity.

Perchloroethylene will continue to be

regulated as a hazardous air pollutant

(HAP) under Section 112 of the CAA.

Final Action

EPA is approving the above

referenced revision to the Georgia SIP.

The EPA is publishing this action

without a prior proposal for approval

because the Agency views this as a

noncontroversial amendment and

anticipates no adverse comments.

However, in a separate document in this

Federal Register publication, the EPA is

proposing to approve the SIP revisions

should adverse or critical comments be

filed. This action will be effective on

August 26, 1996 unless, by July 29,

1996, adverse or critical comments are

received.

If the EPA receives such comments,

this action will be withdrawn before the

effective date by publishing a

subsequent document that will
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 125 / Thursday, June 27, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 33373

withdraw the final action. All public

comments received will then be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on the separate proposed rule.

The EPA will not institute a second

comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting on this

action should do so at this time. If no

such comments are received, the public

is advised that this action will be

effective August 26, 1996.

Under Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,

42 U.S.C. 7607(b)(1), petitions for

judicial review of this action must be

filed in the United States Court of

Appeals for the appropriate circuit by

August 26, 1996. Filing a petition for

reconsideration by the Administrator of

this final rule does not affect the finality

of this rule for purposes of judicial

review nor does it extend the time

within which a petition for judicial

review may be filed, and shall not

postpone the effectiveness of such rule

or action. This action may not be

challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See Section

307(b)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.

7607(b)(2)).

This action has been classified as a

Table 3 action for signature by the

Regional Administrator under the

procedures published in the Federal

Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR

2214–2225), as revised by a July 10,

1995, memorandum from Mary Nichols,

Assistant Administrator for Air and

Radiation. The Office of Management

and Budget (OMB) has exempted this

regulatory action from E.O. 12866

review.

Nothing in this action shall be

construed as permitting or allowing or

establishing a precedent for any future

request for a revision to any state

implementation plan. Each request for

revision to the state implementation

plan shall be considered separately in

light of specific technical, economic,

and environmental factors and in

relation to relevant statutory and

regulatory requirements.

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,

5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA must prepare

a regulatory flexibility analysis

assessing the impact of any proposed or

final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603

and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify

that the rule will not have a significant

impact on a substantial number of small

entities. Small entities include small

businesses, small not-for-profit

enterprises, and government entities

with jurisdiction over populations of

less than 50,000.

SIP approvals under Section 110 and

subchapter I, part D of the CAA do not

create any new requirements, but

simply approve requirements that the

State is already imposing. Therefore,

because the Federal SIP-approval does

not impose any new requirements, I

certify that it does not have a significant

impact on any small entities affected.

Moreover, due to the nature of the

Federal-state relationship under the

CAA, preparation of a regulatory

flexibility analysis would constitute

Federal inquiry into the economic

reasonableness of state action. The CAA

forbids EPA to base its actions

concerning SIPs on such grounds.

Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427

U.S. 246, 256–66 (S.Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C.

7410(a)(2) and 7410(k)(3).

Under Sections 202, 203, and 205 of

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of

1995 (‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’),

signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA

must undertake various actions in

association with proposed or final rules

that include a Federal mandate that may

result in estimated costs of $100 million

or more to the private sector, or to State,

local, or tribal governments in the

aggregate.

Through submission of this state

implementation plan or plan revision,

the State and any affected local or tribal

governments have elected to adopt the

revisions provided for under part D of

Title I of the CAA. These rules may bind

State, local and tribal governments to

perform certain actions and also require

the private sector to perform certain

duties. To the extent that the rules being

approved by this action will impose no

new requirements, since such sources

are already subject to these regulations

under State law. Accordingly, no

additional costs to State, local, or tribal

governments, or to the private sector,

result from this action, and therefore

there will be no significant impact on a

substantial number of small entities.

EPA has also determined that this final

action does not include a mandate that

may result in estimated costs of $100

million or more to State, local, or tribal

governments in the aggregate or to the

private sector.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Hydrocarbons,

Incorporation by reference,

Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,

Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements.

Dated: April 19, 1996.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Acting Regional Administrator.

Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of

Federal Regulations, is amended as

follows:

PART 52—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401–7671(q).

Subpart L—Georgia

2. Section 52.570 is amended by

revising subparagraph (c)(37)(i)(A) to

read as follows:

§ 52.570 Identification of plan.

* * * * *

(c) * * *

(37) * * *

(i) * * *

(A) The following Rules of the Georgia

Department of Natural Resources,

Chapter 391–3–1, Air Quality Control,

became State effective on January 9,

1991.

391–3–1–.01(jjj);

391–3–1–.02(2)(a)4.;

391–3–1–.02(2)(t);

391–3–1–.02(2)(u)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(v)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(w)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(x)2.(i), (iii), and (x)3.(v);

391–3–1–.02(2)(y)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(z)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(aa)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(bb)1.(ii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(cc);

391–3–1–.02(2)(ee)1.(iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(ff)2.(ii)(V) and 3.(iii)(III);

391–3–1–.02(2)(ii)4.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(jj)2.(i) and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(mm)1.(i), (ii), and (iii);

391–3–1–.02(2)(pp);

391–3–1–.02(2)(qq);

391–3–1–.0292)(rr);

391–3–1–.02(2)(ss);

391–3–1–.02(3)(a);

391–3–1–.02(6)(a)3.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 96–16343 Filed 6–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 721

[OPPTS–50601H; FRL–5371–7]

Cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-

trimethyl-5-oxo-; Revocation of a

Significant New Use Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is revoking a significant

new use rule (SNUR) promulgated

under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic

Substances Control Act (TSCA) for

cyclohexanecarbonitrile, 1,3,3-

trimethyl-5-oxo- based on receipt of new

data. Based on the data the Agency

determined that it could not support a