Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 120 / Thursday, June 20, 1996 / Notices 31551

the parties are: Virginia L.L.C. Holding,

Inc., Armonk, NY; and Toshiba America

Electronic Components, Inc., Irvine, CA.

The nature and objectives of the joint

venture are the development,

construction, ownership and joint

operation of a manufacturing facility in

Manassas, Virginia to manufacture

semiconductor products.

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 96–15703 Filed 6–19–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research and Production

Act of 1993—Open Devicenet Vendor

Association, Inc.

Notice is hereby given that, on May

28, 1996, pursuant to § 6(a) of the

National Cooperative Research and

Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C.

§ 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the Open

DeviceNet Vendor Association, Inc.

(‘‘ODVA’’), has filed written

notifications simultaneously with the

Attorney General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing changes in its

membership. The notifications were

filed for the purpose of extending the

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages

under specified circumstances.

Specifically, the identities of the new

members are as follows: Advanced

Micro Controls, Inc., Terryville, CT;

Advantech Co., Ltd., Taipei, TAIWAN;

Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria, IN; Danfoss,

Rockford, IL; Danfoss A/S Nordborg,

DENMARK; Elektro Beckhoff GmbH,

Verl, GERMANY; Exxact, Hu ̈ ckelhoven,

GERMANY; Granville-Phillips Co.,

Boulder, CO; Hewlett-Packard

Company, San Jose, CA; High Country

Tek, Inc., Nevada City, CA; HMS

Fieldbus Systems AB, Halmstad,

SWEDEN; Hassbjer Micro Systems AB,

Halmstad, SWEDEN; Horner Electric,

Inc., Indianapolis, IN; IMI Norgren

Limited, Lichfield, ENGLAND; IMI PCC,

Birmingham, ENGLAND; Industrial

Indexing Systems, Inc., Victor, NY; ARO

Fluid Products Division of IngersollRand, Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Institut

fu ̈r Elektriche MeBtechnik und

Grundlagen der Elektrotechnik,

Braunschweig, GERMANY; Intellution,

Inc., Norwood, MA; Emerson Electric,

St. Louis, MO; International Motion

Controls, Chicago, IL; Kollmorgen

Industrial Drives, Radford, VA;

Kollmorgen Corporation, New York, NY;

National Instruments Corporation,

Austin, TX; NetSafety Monitoring, Inc.,

Calgary, Alberta, CANADA; New

Technology, Inc., Aurora, CO; PAC

Enterprises, Denver, CO; OASYS Group,

Inc., Naperville, IL; Olflex Wire & Cable,

Inc., Fairfield, NJ; U.I. Lapp GmbH & Co.

KG, Stuttgart, GERMANY; OPTO 22,

Temecula, CA; Robicon, New

Kensington, PA; High Voltage

Engineering, Inc. Wakefield, MA; S.E.

Peterlongon, Gerenbano, ITALY;

Steeplechase Software, Inc., Ann Arbor,

MI; Steinbeis Transferzentrum

Prozessaubomatiesierung, Weingarten,

GERMANY; Steinbeis Stiffung fu ̈r

Wirtschaflsfoscheiung, Stuttgart,

GERMANY; Tait Control Systems, Ltd.,

Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND; Ten X

Technology, Inc., Austin, TX; Toyoda

Machine Works, Ltd., Aichi, JAPAN

Unitrode, Inc., Merrimack, NH; Vorne

Industries, Inc., Itasca, IL; Warwick

Manufacturing Group, Coventry,

ENGLAND; University of Warwick,

Coventry, ENGLAND; Wonderware

Corporation, Irvine, CA; and Wizdom

Controls, Inc., Naperville, IL.

The name of the following member

has changed: Reliance Electric

Industrial Company is now Rockwell

Automation/Reliance electric Industrial

Company. Control of the following

member has changed: Socapel SA has

been acquired by Atlas Copco Controls,

SA, Penthaz, SWITZERLAND.

No other changes have been made in

either the membership or planned

activity of the joint venture.

Membership in this venture remains

open. ODVA intends to file additional

written notifications disclosing all

membership changes.

On June 21, 1995, the Open DeviceNet

Vendor Association, Inc., filed its

original notification pursuant to § 6(a) of

the Act. The Department of Justice

published a notice in the Federal

Register pursuant to § 6(b) of the Act on

February 15, 1996 (61 Fed. Reg. 6039).

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 96–15704 Filed 6–19–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–01–M

Office of Justice Programs

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request

ACTION: Notice of information collection

under review: capital punishment

annual data collection.

The proposed information collection

is published to obtain comments from

the public and affected agencies.

Comments are encouraged and will be

accepted for 60 days from the date listed

at the top of this page in the Federal

Register. This process is in accordance

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995.

Request written comments and

suggestions from the public and affected

agencies concerning the proposed

collection of information. Your

comments should address one or more

of the following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

If you have additional comments,

suggestions, or need a copy of the

proposed information collection

instrument with instructions, or

additional information, please contact

Dr. Jan M. Chaiken, at 202–307–0765 or

write to Director, Bureau of Justice

Statistics, United States Department of

Justice, Room 1142B, Indiana Building,

633 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC, 20531.

Additionally, comments and/or

suggestions regarding the items(s)

contained in this notice, especially

regarding the estimated public burden

and associated response time should

also be directed to Dr. Jan M. Chaiken.

Overview of this information

collection:

(1) Type of Information Collection:

Reinstatement, without change, of a

previously approved collection for

which approval has expired.

(2) Title of the Form/Collection:

Capital Punishment Report of Inmates

Under Sentence of Death.

(3) Agency form number, if any, and

the applicable component of the

Department of Justice sponsoring the

collection: Forms: NPS–8 Report of

Inmates Under Sentence of Death; NPS–

8A Update Report of Inmates Under

Sentence of Death; NPS–8B Status of

Death Penalty—No Statute in Force;

NPS–8C Status of Death Penalty—

Statute in Force. Bureau of Justice

Statistics, Office of Justice Programs,

United States Department of Justice.
31552 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 120 / Thursday, June 20, 1996 / Notices

(4) Affected public who are asked or

required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract: Primary: State or Local

governments, Others: Federal

government.

Approximately 52 Attorneys General

and 52 designated officials responsible

for keeping records of inmates under

sentence of death will be asked to

provide information on condemned

inmate’s demographic characteristics,

legal status at the time of capital offense,

capital offense for which imprisoned,

number of death sentences imposed,

criminal history information, reason for

removal if no longer under sentence of

death, method of execution, and cause

of death other than by execution. This

program analyzes capital punishment

statutes, and persons under sentence of

death in State and Federal correctional

institutions. The Bureau of Justice

Statistics uses this information in

published reports, and for the U.S.

Congress, Executive Office of the

President, practitioners, researchers,

students, the media, and others in the

criminal justice community.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond: 304 responses at 1 hour each

for the NPS–8; 2,890 responses at 1⁄2

hour each for the NPS–8A; and 52

responses at 1⁄2 hour each for the NPS–

8B or NPS–8C.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: 1,775 annual burden hours.

If additional information is required,

contact: Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Clearance

Officer, United States Department of

Justice, Information Management and

Security Staff, Justice Management

Division, Suite 850, Washington Center,

1001 G Street, NW., Washington, DC

20503.

Dated: June 14, 1996.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 96–15664 Filed 6–19–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of June, 1996.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–32,117; Hubbell Lighting, Inc.,

Christiansburg, VA

TA–W–32,249; J & W Garment

Manufacturing, Scotts Hill, TN

TA–W–32,256; Colgate—Palmolive Co.,

Jeffersonville Plant, Jeffersonville,

IN

TA–W–32,123; Magnolia Hosiery Mill,

Inc., Corinth, MS

TA–W–32,222; American Screen

Printers, Inc., Mt Pleasant, NC

TA–W–32,198 & A, TA–W–32,199; E.I.

Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc,

Dupont Nylon, Wilmington, DE,

Seaford, DE, Martinsville, VA

TA–W–32,200, TA–W–32,201, TA–W–

32,202; E. I. De Pont De Nemours &

Co., Inc, Lugoff, SC, Athens, GA,

Chattanooga, TN

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–32,230; Rexam Graphics, South

Hadley, MA

TA–W–32,192; Stafford Blaine Designs

LTD, Minneapolis, MN

TA–W–32,126; The New Cherokee Corp.,

Spindale, NC

TA–W–32,068; American Tape Co.,

North Bergen, NJ

TA–W–32,214; Layne, Inc., Christensen

Mining Products (AKA Boyles

Brothers Drilling Co., Acker Div.),

Chinchilla, PA

TA–W–32,275 & A; American Stud Co,

American Timber Co., Olney, MT

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–32,243; Pepe International, Inc.,

Houston, TX

TA–W–32,135; Siecor Corp., San Diego,

CA

TA–W–32,191; General Electric

Appliances, Little Rock Distribution

Center, Little Rock, AR

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–32,158; Redco Foods, Inc., Little

Falls, NY

TA–W–32,144; Plastic Manufacturing

Co., Dallas, TX

The investigation revealed that

criterion (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–32,270; Ithaca Industries, Inc.,

Vidalia, GA

The investigation revealed that

criterion (1) has not been met. A

significant number or proportion of the

workers did not become totally or

partially separated as required for

certification.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

TA–W–32,281; Williams Advanced

Materials, Buffalo, NY: March 30,

1995

TA–W–32,346; Addison & Leyen, Inc.,

Williston, ND: May 9, 1995.

TA–W–32,248; Capital Management

(AKA Davis Bros. L.L.C.), Tulsa, OK:

March 13, 1995.

TA–W–32,288; Continental General Tire

Co., Inc., Mayfield, KY: April 16,

1995.

TA–W–32,311; United Technologies,

Automotive Wiring Systems Div., El

Paso, TX: April 19, 1995.

TA–W–32,168; Salant/Thomson,

Thomson, GA: March 26, 1995.

TA–W–32,314; Madeira Twin Fashions,

Inc., New Bedford, MA: April 23,

1995.

TA–W–32,187; Benkel Mfg Co.,

Brooklyn, NY: April 2, 1995.

TA–W–32,286; Metric Products, Inc.,

Calver City, CA: April 17, 1995.

TA–W–32,359; 3 M Co., Rochester, NY:

May 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,310; Crown Pacific Limited

Partnership, Albeni Falls, Oldtown,

ID: April 22, 1995.