alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert W. HOSEY, Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF VICTORIA, Sheriff Dalton Meyer, and Michael Pfiel, LVN, Appellees.

No. 13-93-072-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi.

April 1, 1993.

John E. Sherman, Houston, for appellant.

James G. Stouffer, Jr., Michael A. Johnson, Mark C. Rains, Cullen, Carsner, Seer-den & Cullen, Victoria, for appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The trial court dismissed the present case for lack of prosecution on October 21, 1992. Plaintiff, Robert W. Hosey filed a motion to reinstate on November 9, 1992, and a timely notice of appeal on December 3,1992. However, a cost bond, cash deposit, or pauper’s affidavit was necessary to perfect appeal. Thus, Hosey filed with this court on March 3, 1993 a motion, and on March 12, 1993, an amended motion, to extend his time to file a pauper’s affidavit, with a copy of such pauper’s affidavit attached as an exhibit.

We note that under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(a)(2) the 15-day time limit for requesting from this court an extension of time to perfect appeal had passed before Hosey filed the present motion. We are aware that the Texas Supreme Court in *Grand Prairie Independent School District v. Southern Parts Imports, Inc.,*813 S.W.2d 499 (Tex.1991) said that, “[i]f the appellant timely files a document in a bona fide attempt to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction, the court of appeals, on appellant’s motion, must allow the appellant an opportunity to amend or refile the instrument required by law or our Rules to perfect the appeal.” *Id.*at 500.

However, the simple filing of a notice of appeal, as was done in this case, absent additional actions, does not establish, by itself, a bona fide attempt to invoke our jurisdiction and perfect an appeal. *See Wilcox v. Seelbinder,*840 S.W.2d 680 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1992, no writ); *cf. Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.,*774 S.W.2d 668 (Tex.1989) (misunderstanding of law is a reasonable explanation under Rule 41(a)(2) excusing failure to timely file cost bond).

We hold that we are without jurisdiction to allow Hosey to now file a pauper’s affidavit in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the appellate court beyond the ordinary time limits allowed by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

We deny appellant’s motion and order the present appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
#### Beverly L. O’DELL (Now Mitchell), Respondent, v. Herman Sherman O’DELL, Appellant.

No. WD 50088.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 5, 1995.

Barbara A. Braznell, St. Joseph, for appellant.

Beverly L. O’Dell, St. Joseph, respondent pro se.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from denial of motion to modify child support.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.5


                                  CERTIFICATION

                         Chase Manhattan RV Owner Trust
                           Series 1997-A (the "Trust")

I, William L. Schumm, an Executive Vice President of The CIT Group/Sales
Financing, Inc., as servicer for the above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale
         and servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in
         these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
         under the sale and servicing agreement and based upon my knowledge and
         the annual compliance review required under the sale and servicing
         agreement and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
         fulfilled its obligations under the sale and servicing agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         sale and servicing agreement, that is included in these reports.





Date:    March 30, 2004

/s/ William L. Schumm
-------------------------------
Name:  William L. Schumm
Title: Executive Vice President
       The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   June 14, 2011





|/s/ Andrew Brodkey                               
|-------------------------------------------------
|Andrew Brodkey, CEO                              
|(Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



Dated:  June 14, 2011





|/s/ Rakesh Malhotra                              
|-------------------------------------------------
|Rakesh Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer         
|(Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN,

Case Number 08-CV-14922
Plaintiff, Hon. Patrick J. Duggan

Vv.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD

OF TRUSTEES, GARY D. RUSSI, MARY BETH
SNYDER, and LIONEL MATEN, in their

official capacities,

Defendants.

DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLMENTAL SUBMISSION AND SUR-REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF
DEFENDANT, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION



DISCUSSION
In his Reply Brief in Support of His Motion for Substitution of Defendant, Summary
Judgment and Permanent Injunction, Plaintiff claims that Defendants have submitted their
Expert’s Report to this Court. and consequently, Plaintiff filed his Expert’s Report with the Court
as an exhibit to his Reply Brief. (See Plaintiff's Brief, p. 4, n.5) Contrary to Plaintiff's
representation, Defendants have not previously submitted their Expert’s Report to this Court. As
a means to complete the record represented by Plaintiff, though, Defendants are doing so as an

attachment hereto. (See Exhibit 1)

Respectfully submitted,
BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin
Robert A. Boonin (P38172)

350 South Main Street, Suite 300
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
(734) 995-3110
boonin@pbutzel.com
dahle@pbutzel.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: December 16, 2009



Certificate of Service

I, Robert A. Boonin, hereby certify that on December 16, 2009, I electronically filed the
foregoing document with the Clerk of the court using the ECF system, which will send
notification of such filing to all counsel of record.

BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin
Robert A. Boonin (P38172)

350 South Main Street, Suite 300
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104
(734) 995-3110

boonin@butzel.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF MITTAL STEEL COMPANY N.V.'S  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT

I,
Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, certify that:

Date:
March 17, 2006

|/s/LAKSHMI N. MITTALMr. Lakshmi N. Mittal Chairman of
the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Mittal Steel Company N.V. |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



Date:
March 17, 2006

|/s/ADITYA MITTALMr. Aditya Mittal President and Chief
Financial Officer of Mittal Steel Company N.V. |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
      32**
















**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**




















The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Greg Cowan, President and
      Principal Accounting Officer of Rose Explorations Inc. hereby certifies that:





1.
      the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rose Explorations
      Inc.











Dated:
      May 13,
      2007 ROSE
      EXPLORATIONS INC., Registrant




/s/
      Greg
      Cowan


By:
      Greg Cowan, President and Principal Accounting Officer
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 6 Filed 11/12/08 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 6 Filed 11/12/08 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 6 Filed 11/12/08 Page 3 of 3
Kenneth S. Apfel has been appointed to serve as Commissioner of Socia l * Security, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of App ellate Procedure 43(c). The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District

1 of Mi nnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable John M
. Mason, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3577

___________ Bonita E. Foss-Roseen, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Kenneth S. Apfel, * * * [UNPUBLISHED] Defendant - Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: December 2, 1997 Filed: December 17, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bonita E. Foss-Roseen appeals the district court & s order granting summary 1 judgment to the Commissioner and affirming the Commissioner & s decision to deny-2-

F o ss-Roseen disability insurance benefits. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties & submissions, we affirm the judgment of th e district court for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge & s report. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3651

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to limit expenditures

in House of Representatives elections.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. POMEROY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

limit expenditures in House of Representatives elections.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXPENDITURES IN HOUSE OF

4 REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS.

5 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in,

9 or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress
2

•HR 3651 IH

1 may not make expenditures with respect to an election for

2 such office, which, in the aggregate, exceed $300,000.’’.

3 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with

5 respect to elections occurring after 1996.

Æ
EXHIBIT
9



OAKLAND UNIVERSITY

DEPARTMENT OF UNIVERSITY HousING

448 Hamlin Hall
Rochester, MI 48309-4401
(248) 370-3570

Fax: (248) 370-3340

November 28, 2007

Micah Fialka-Feldman
10474 LaSalle
Huntington Woods, MI 48070

Dear Micah:

The housing contract you recently submitted is being returned to you as you are not an admitted
Oakland University student and are not registered for Winter 2008 classes, Students must be
registered for classes to live in the Residence Halls. The $100 down Payment you submitted will
be refunded by University check and will be forwarded to you as soon as Possible,

If your situation changes and you are able to get registered, you are welcome to submit another
housing contract.

Sincerely,
Sn Mlle
Lionel Maten

Director of University Housing

Enclosures
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                                                                       Exhibit I

                  Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                      with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards


March 26, 2003


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc. (the "Company"), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc., has complied
in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").



<PAGE>

As of and for this same period, CIT Group Inc. had in effect a financial
institution bond, computer crime policy, and errors and omissions policy in the
following amounts:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Insurance Type               Coverage                Coverage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial institution bond                 $60mm            09/30/98 to 09/15/02
                                           $60mm            09/30/02 to 09/30/03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer crime policy                      $60mm            09/30/98 to 09/15/02
                                           $60mm            09/30/02 to 09/30/03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Errors and omissions                       $25mm            12/30/01 to 12/30/02
                                           $10mm            12/30/02 to 12/30/03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


/s/ Thomas B. Hallman
------------------------------------
Thomas B. Hallman

President & Chief Executive Officer
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.

/s/ William L. Schumm
------------------------------------
William L. Schumm

Executive Vice President
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.

/s/ Kenneth P. Reynolds
------------------------------------
Kenneth P. Reynolds
Senior Vice President, Treasurer
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.


/s/ Frank Garcia
------------------------------------
Frank Garcia

Senior Vice President
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.
Order filed, May 16, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00288

- CR

____________ KENYATTA WESLEY FRED ERICK , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 413th Judicial District

Johnson County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. F46217



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due May 06, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Becau se the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Pam Waits , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Douglas Dewar, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northwest Chariots Incorporated (the “Registrant”);





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and I have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and





6. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: August 12, 2009








By:           /s/  Douglas Dewar





Douglas Dewar


President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41279 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAFAEL ACEVES

- LARA , also known as Rafael Lara,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 633

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael Aceves

- Lara has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Aceves

- Lara h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41279 Document: 00513556601 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 41279

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41279 Document: 00513556601 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Chemical and Transport Systems 
(#1190).
    Dates and Times: July 22-23, 1996; 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 580 National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Program Managers, NSF/EPA Partnership, Chemical 
and Transport Systems Divisions, Room 525, NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1371.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF/EPA Partnership Proposal 
Solicitation (95-48) for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate nominations for the NSF/EPA 
Partnership proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: July 1, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-17137 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M