T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e R e be c c aR . P a l l m e y e r , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f or ** the N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof I l l i noi s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C L YD E J AME S R AI NE Y, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. M I K E K N O W LES, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 17222 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 6 7 8 - CW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C l audi aW i l ke n, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d J une 15, 2010 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: R Y M E R and F IS H E R , C i rc ui tJudg es , and P A L L M E Y E R , D i stri ct Judg e. ** C l y de J a m e s R a i ne y appe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s de ni a l of hi s habe a s c orpus p e t i t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 4 . W e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU L 06 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 I T he C a l i f

orni aC ourtof

A ppe a l ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tthe tr i a l c ourtw a s not r e qui r e d sua spo nt e t o h ol d a com pet encyhear i ng i s nei ther c on traryt o, no r an unr e a s onabl e appl i c a t i on of , S upr e m e C ourtpr e c e de nt . T he s t a nda r d appl i e d by th e c o u rt o f

ap p e a l c o m p o rts w ith f e d e r a l la w . Se e , e . g. , G odi nezv . Mor an , 509 U .S . 3 8 9 , 4 0 2 ( 1 9 9 3 ) ; P ate v . R obi ns on , 3 8 3 U. S . 3 7 5 , 3 8 3 - 8 5 ( 1 9 6 6 ) . No c o n tr o llin g f

e d e r a l la w in d ic a te s th a t am e n ta l d e f ic ie n c y , a lo n e , s u f

f ic e s , n o rd id R a in e y ’s b e h a v io rr a is e ab o n af id e d o u b t s u c h th a t th e tr ia l c o u rt w a s o b lig e d to cond ucta hea ri ng on i t s ow n i ni t i at i ve. E xp ertt es t i m on y s ho w ed thatR ai ney co u ldth in k , g et th ro u g h li fe , an d li v e a n d w o rk o n h is o w n . A n d R ain ey ’s d i s c u s s i o n w i th h i s mo th e rn o to n l y r e v e a l s c o n s c i o u s n e s s o f g u i l ty , b u tc o n f

i rms R a in e y ’s u n d e r s ta n d in g o f th e n a tu r e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s h e f

a c e d a n d h is ab ility to h elp in h is d ef

en se . F in ally, d ef

en se co u n se l ex p re ss ed n o co n ce rn ab o u t R ain ey ’s c o m p e te n c e . T h is is n o t ac o n tr o llin g f a c to ra s am a tte ro f

f e d e r a l la w ( a s it is un der C al i forni a s t at e l aw ), bu ti tbo l st er s the concl usi on thatthe tri al j ud ge w as notr e qui r e d t o c onduc tac om pe t e nc y he ar i ng.

II3

T h e s tate trial j u d g e’s f

in d in g o n h ab ea s r ev iew th at P h il li p K en d rick ’s st at em entw as no tm at er i al , and thu s thatfa i l ure t o d i sc l ose i tdi d n otvi ol at e B r ady v . M ar y land , 373 U . S . 83 ( 1963) , i s notba s e d on a n unr e a s onabl e de t e rm i na t i on of the f a c t s . K e ndr i c k t e s t i f

i e d a ta n e vi de nt i a ry he a r i ng, ga ve s e ve r a l di f f e r e nt ve r s i ons of

the i nc i de nt , a nd a dm i tt e d he w a s nott e l l i ng the truth. N orw a s the court ’ s det erm i nat i on an un re as on abl e app l i ca t i on of B r ady . See U ni ted Stat es v. B ag ley , 4 7 3 U .S . 6 6 7 , 6 8 1 - 8 2 ( 1 9 8 5 ) ; Str i c kle rv . G r e e ne , 527 U . S . 263, 280 (1 9 9 9 ). T h e a b se n ce o f tes ti m o n y a s u n re li ab le an d u n tru stw o rth y a s K en d rick ’s d o e s n o t u n d e rm in e c o n f id e n c e in th e o u tc o m e . T he tr i a l c ourt ’ s c onc l us i on tha ta ny a tt e m ptt o pr ove R a i ne y ’ s c onf e s s i on w a s f a ls e w o u ld b e u n a v a ilin g lik e w is e is n e ith e rc o n tr a ry to , n o ra n u n r e a s o n ab le appl i ca t i on of, S up re m e C ou rtprec edent . R ai ney’ s s t at em ent s t o h i s m other w er e c l e a r , s pont a ne ous , a nd unqua l i f i e d. H i s s t a t e m e ntt o the pol i c e a l s o i m pl i c a t e d a ga ng m e m be r , w hi c h w oul d unde rm i ne athe ory tha the w a s a f r a i d of ga ng r e ta lia tio n . A F F I R M E D .