alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                      CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that he is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan RV Owner Trust 1997-A and that he is duly authorized
to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in connection
with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of September 1,
1997 (the "Indenture") and the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of
September 1, 1997 (the "Agreement"), among CITSF, as Servicer, Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, National Association and Chase Manhattan Bank, as Sellers, and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee. All capitalized terms used herein
without definition shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture
and the Agreement.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under his supervision
and, to the best of his knowledge, the Issuer has fulfilled its obligations
under the Indenture for the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this   day
of March, 2002.

                                    CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                                    BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                    individual capacity, but solely as Owner
                                    Trustee


                                    /s/ Denise M. Geran
                                    ------------------------
                                    Name:  Denise M. Geran
                                    Title: Financial Services Officer

The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc., as Servicer, hereby requests that
Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee execute the above Issuer's
Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota, National Association,
as Indenture Trustee.

                                    THE CIT GROUP/SALES
                                    FINANCING, INC., as Servicer


                                    /s/ Gilmar Rodrigues
                                    ---------------------
                                    Name:  Gilmar Rodrigues
                                    Title: Vice President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

d1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147368

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147368

COA: 314944

Bay CC: 98-001264-FH;

RICHARD CONRAD WITBRODT, 98-001265-FH

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-9 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 3371
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-9 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 3372
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-9 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 3373
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 157-9 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 3374
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
accompanying financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                  510
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        510
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                1,430,700
<OTHER-SE>                              44,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            510
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        0
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           5,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (5,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.004)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16771]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration: (The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Common Stock, 
$.01 Par Value, Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2004, and 
Common Stock Purchase Rights) File No. 1-8722

June 26, 1996.
    The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation's (``Company'') has filed an 
application with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to 
withdraw the above specified securities (``Securities'') from listing 
and registration on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the 
Securities from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, in making the decision to withdraw its 
Common Stock, Debentures and Common Stock Purchase Rights from listing 
on the Amex, the Company considered the direct and indirect costs and 
expenses attendant on maintaining the dual listing of its Common Stock, 
Debentures and Common Stock Purchase Rights on the NYSE and the Amex. 
The Company does not see any particular advantage in the dual trading 
of its securities and believes that dual listing would fragment the 
market for its securities.
    Any interested person may, on or before July 18, 1996 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16771 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20006-09

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

DANYELL SOMMER,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On September 21, 2009, this case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

September 21, 2009. In open court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by

Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense(s) to which Defendant pleaded guilty is(are) supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have ordered the

preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB Doc # 118 Filed 09/22/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 339
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and Recommendation

within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure

to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins. Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596

(6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The parties are

advised that making some objections, but failing to raise others, will not preserve all the objections

a party may have to this Report and Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security,

474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir. 2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich.

LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this magistrate judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: September 22, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB Doc # 118 Filed 09/22/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 340
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P. (thePartnership) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of Reef Oil & GasPartners, L.P., the managing general partner of Reef Global Energy IX, L.P.,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m OR 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 
| Date: November 14, 2007 | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P.        |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                         | Managing General Partner                      |
|                         |                                          |
|                         | By: Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC |
|                         | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli                        |   |
|                         | Michael J. Mauceli                            |
|                         | Manager and Member                            |
|                         | (principal executive officer)                 |

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subjectto the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to beincorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL JERMAIL CRIMES,

Petitioner,

 CASE NO. 09-10402

v. HONORABLE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE KOMIVES

CINDI S. CURTIN,

Respondent,

__________________________________/

ORDER (1) RE-OPENING THIS CASE, 

(2) GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO AMEND HIS HABEAS PETITION,

AND (3) DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING

On February 2, 2009, petitioner Michael Jermail Crimes filed a habeas corpus

petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenged his state convictions and sentence

for armed robbery and first-degree home invasion. He raised two claims about the scoring

of the state sentencing guidelines and a third claim, which alleged that his trial attorney was

ineffective for failing to produce certain witnesses at trial. 

Petitioner subsequently moved to hold his habeas petition in abeyance while he

pursued additional state remedies. On March 31, 2009, the Court granted Petitioner’s

motion on the condition that he file a motion for relief from judgment in the trial court within

ninety days of the Court’s order. The Court further conditioned the stay on 

Petitioner moving to re-open this case and filing an amended habeas petition within ninety

days of exhausting state court remedies for his new claims. The Court closed the case for

administrative purposes only. 
2

Currently pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to reinstate this case and

to amend his habeas petition to include the four claims that he raised in his motion for relief

from judgment in the trial court. Those claims allege that: trial counsel was ineffective for

failing to object to the sufficiency of the evidence for armed robbery; trial counsel had a

conflict of interest; the jury instruction on aiding and abetting was erroneously incorporated

into the armed robbery instruction; and appellate counsel was “cause” for Petitioner’s failure

to raise these issues in the first appeal. 

Petitioner appears to have exhausted state remedies for all his claims, both his initial

three claims and his four newer claims. He also appears to have complied with the

conditions of the Court’s stay by filing a timely post-conviction motion in state court and by

promptly moving for reinstatement of this case following exhaustion of state remedies.

Accordingly, the motion to amend the habeas petition and to reinstate this case [Dkt. #8]

is GRANTED. Respondent is ORDERED to file the relevant state court records and a

response to the amended petition within 180 days of the date of this order. 

 s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: October 5, 2010

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the above date a copy of this Order was served upon the

Petitioner, and Counsel for the Respondent via ordinary U.S. Mail and electronic filing.

s/Bernadette M. Thebolt

Case Manager
15-1823 

Francis v. Kings Park Manor, Inc. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE

SECOND CIRCUIT 

_________________ 

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second 

Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, 

in the City of New York, on the 5th day of April, two thousand nineteen. 

Present: 

Rosemary S. Pooler, 

Debra Ann Livingston, 

Raymond J. Lohier, Jr., 

Circuit Judges.

 

Donahue Francis, 

 

Plaintiff – Appellant, 

v. 15-1823 

Kings Park Manor, Inc., Corrine Downing, 

Defendants – Appellees, 

Raymond Endres, 

Defendant. 

 

It is hereby ORDERED that this Court’s decision and opinions, issued on March 4, 2019, 

are WITHDRAWN. 

 

FOR THE COURT: 

Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 23

- 2443 LT Case No s . 201 1

- CF

- 007056

- A

_____________________________ E DDIE H ESTER , JR. , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Kevin A . Blaz s , Judge

. Eddi e Hester , Jr., Century , pro se . Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. January 30 , 2024
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., K ILBANE , and P RATT , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jane A. Freeman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Scientific Learning Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2004 that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 25, 2005   /s/ Jane A. Freeman       Jane A. Freeman
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

2 East Congress Street, Suite 1000

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1782

(520) 622-6900

Michael L. Piccarreta 

State Bar No. 003962 

Email: mlp@pd-law.com

Attorney for Defendant Andrew Padilla

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

6. Andrew Padilla,

 (Counts 1-51)

 Defendant.

NO. CR-18-00422-06-PHX-DLR

DEFENDANT PADILLA’S JOINDER IN 

DEFENDANT BRUNST’S OPPOSITION 

TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO 

DEFER DISCLOSURE OF CARL 

FERRER’S JENCKS ACT STATEMENTS 

AND OBJECTION TO IN CAMERA

FILING OF THE SAME, AND REQUEST 

FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE SAME (DOC. 

477)

Defendant Andrew Padilla, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby joins in 

Defendant John Brunst’s Opposition to Government’s Motion to Defer Disclosure of Carl 

Ferrer’s Jencks Act Statements and Objection to in camera Filing of the Same, and 

Request for Disclosure of the Same (Doc. 477), and adopts the positions set forth 

in said motion as if fully set forth herein. Defendant Padilla is in agreement with 

the arguments made in Defendant Brunst’s opposition, and the issues raised by 

Defendant Brunst apply with equal force to Defendant Padilla.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 486 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 1st day of March, 2019.

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

By: /s/ Michael L. Piccarreta

Michael L. Piccarreta

Attorney for Defendant Andrew Padilla

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 1st day of March, 2019, I electronically transmitted 

the foregoing to the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Reginald Jones: Reginald.Jones@usdoj.gov

Peter S. Kozinets: Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov

John Kucera: John.Kucera@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov

Kevin Rapp: Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov

Thomas Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Paul Cambria: pcambira@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Bruce Feder: bfeder@federlaw.com

James Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

Michael D. Kimerer, mdk@kimerer.com

Gary Lincenberg: glincenberg@birdmarella.com

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 486 Filed 03/01/19 Page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000569 16-FEB-2017 02:06 PM SCWC-15-0000569
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

ALBERT BATALONA, Petitioner and Respondent/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.
STATE OF HAWAI ' I, Respondent and Petitioner/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000569; S.P.P. NO. 10-1-0096; CR. NO. 99-1549)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ( By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Respondent and Petitioner/Respondent-Appellee State of Hawaii’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on January 4, 2017, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, February 16, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson