alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 120 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 120

            For the relief of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any 
order, for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop shall be deemed to 
have been lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, and 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1255).
    (b) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsection (a) shall apply 
only if the applications for issuance of immigrant visas or the 
applications for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees 
not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas to Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 2, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Denes 
Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop under section or 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are of birth of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop 
under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
** **

**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as AdoptedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Chene Gardner, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp. fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Helmer Directional Drilling Corp.

 

Date: September 23, 2013

 

By:	*/s/ Chene Gardner*

Chene Gardner

Chief Financial Officer
|Exhibit 23
|----------

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-45949, File No. 333-68855, File No.
333-77111, and File No. 333-73240) of our report dated February 6, 2002 relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the 2001 Annual
Report to Shareholders of PMA Capital Corporation, which is incorporated by
reference in PMA Capital Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated February 6, 2002 relating to the financial statement schedules,
which appears in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, PA
March 19, 2002

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.3

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company
Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Xu Jie Bo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: June 29, 2004




                                                  By: /s/ Xu Jie Bo
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name: Xu Jie Bo
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer


*      This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
       Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
       by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
       purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
       amended.

*      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
       the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will
       be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
       Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT

            We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Forms S-8 of Linkwell Corporation and the related
prospectuses of our audit report dated March 25, 2006, except as to Note 1 - and
the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 1 as to which the date is
September 19, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet at December
31, 2005 and the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows of Linkwell Corporation and its subsidiaries for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 in the Form 10-KSB/A#2 for the year ended December
31, 2005.


/s/ Sherb & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants


Boca Raton, Florida
November 7, 2006
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit Description of Exhibit

1 Letter to Kim Dembrosky from Dr. Howard Schubiner 

2 Affidavit of Micah Fialka-Feldman 

3 Proposal to Establish a Continuing Education Program 

4 Letter from Robert Wiggins 

5 E-mail from Kim Dembrosky 

6 OPTIONS Program Brochure 

7 Contract for Residence Halls Services, 2007-08 

8. E-mail from Bob Wiggins to Rick Feldman and Kim Dembrosky 

 Dated 11/8/2007 

9 E-mails from Bob Wiggins to Rick Feldman Dated 11/29/07 and 1/10/08 

10 E-mail to Rick Feldman from Roxanne Fisher 

11 Letter to Micah Fialka-Feldman from Lionel Maten 

12 Oakland University Account Status for Micah Fialka-Feldman 

13 Oakland University Residence Halls Contract Release Request, 

 3/6/08 Version 

14 Letter to Micah Fialka-Feldman from Mary Beth Snyder Dated 5/23/08 

15 Affidavit of Sharon Howell 

16 Oakland University Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes from 9/17/08 

 

17 Letter to Micah Fialka-Feldman from Mary Beth Snyder Dated 9/24/08 

18 Letter to Victor Zambardi from Chris Davis Dated 10/7/08 

19 Mary Beth Snyder Statement to Board of Trustees on 11/5/08 

20 Letter to Chris Davis from Victor Zambardi Dated 11/7/08 
21 Letter to Victor Zambardi from Chris Davis Dated 11/14/08 

22 Letter to Chris Davis from Victor Zambardi Dated 11/17/08 

23 MORC Eligibility Determination Documentation 

24 Transition Individualized Education Program Team Report Dated 6/20/08 

25 Affidavit of Nicole Bertrand 

26 Affidavit of Heather Sterner 

27 Oakland University Student ID Card and Personal Profile for Micah 

 Fialka-Feldman 

28 Oakland University Reading-Writing Clinic Final Report 

29 Oakland University Housing Web Page 

30 Oakland University Housing Web Page: What Students Are Saying 

31 Robert Wiggins Deposition Excerpts 

32 Mary Beth Snyder Deposition Excerpts 

33 Lionel Maten Deposition Excerpts 

34 Micah Fialka-Feldman Deposition Excerpts 

35 Richard Feldman Deposition Excerpts 

36 Janice Fialka Deposition Excerpts
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LENERO THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 08-CV-14225 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

GUS HARRISON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (# 7)

Plaintiff Lenero Thomas, appearing pro per, filed a prisoner civil rights complaint on

October 3, 2008. By Order of October 14, 2008, Thomas was directed to file two additional

copies of the complaint within 30 days to facilitate service, as required under Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 4(c)(1). Thomas was forewarned that failure to timely file the additional

copies could result in the dismissal of his complaint. On December 11, 2008, the court

dismissed the complaint for want of prosecution in failing to comply with the October 14,

2008 Order. Twelve days later, on December 23, 2008, the court received a letter from

Thomas stating he did not understand why he was required to file the additional copies until

he received the December 11, 2008 dismissal order. Thomas did not file the additional

copies as required. Thomas invoked "Rule 34c; 1(2)(c)" for the proposition that the rule

"gives me thirty days before the final decision." The letter was not construed as a motion.

On March 31, 2009, Thomas caused a second letter to be filed as a "follow up on the

reconsideration." The Clerk docketed this letter as a motion for reconsideration.

2:08-cv-14225-GCS-SDP Doc # 8 Filed 10/29/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 65
2

A motion for reconsideration must be filed within 10 days after entry of the

challenged order. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(1). Generally, and without restricting the court's

discretion, the court will not grant a motion for reconsideration that merely presents the

same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The

movant must not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties

have been mislead but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different

disposition of the case. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3).

Thomas' initial letter, received by the court on December 23, 2008, did not constitute

a motion for reconsideration, and alternatively, did not demonstrate that the court palpably

erred by dismissing his complaint for failing to obey the October 14, 2008 Order. Thomas'

second letter, filed on March 31, 2009 and construed as a motion for reconsideration, is

untimely and, alternatively, likewise fails to demonstrate palpable error. Accordingly, and

pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g)(1) and (3), 

Thomas' motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 29, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

October 29, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:08-cv-14225-GCS-SDP Doc # 8 Filed 10/29/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 66
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
OMEGA RESEARCH, INC. FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE 

THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER, 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001042814
<NAME>                          OMEGA RESEARCH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         12,323,515
<SECURITIES>                                   1,014,590
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,817,384
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,379,166
<INVENTORY>                                    146,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               26,406,681
<PP&E>                                         2,207,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,235,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 27,469,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,237,149
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       222,461
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,010,208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   27,469,818
<SALES>                                        24,364,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               29,226,274
<CGS>                                          1,848,993
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,981,699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (164,453)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,450,736
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,940,313
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,488,731<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,451,582<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,451,582<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.27<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.26<F1>
        
<FN>
<F1> Reflects pro forma provision income taxes as if the Company were a C 
     Corporation subject to Federal and state Corporate income taxes for the 
     entire year. See Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 45 Att. 13

Dockets.Justia.com
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33737-33738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5529-8]


Public Meeting of the Storm Water Phase II Advisory Subcommittee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is changing the date and place of the August meeting of 
the Storm Water Phase II Advisory Subcommittee. In the Federal Register 
Notice of Wednesday, April 24, this meeting was listed as being held on 
August 5-6, 1996 at the Latham Hotel Georgetown. Discussions on issues 
concerning the framework for Phase II implementation will be continued 
at this meeting. This meeting is open to the public without need for 
advance registration.

DATES: The SubCommittee meeting will be held on August 12-13, 1996. On 
August 12, the meeting will begin at approximately 9:00 a.m. EST and 
run until approximately 5:30 p.m. On August 13, the meeting will run 
from approximately 8:30 a.m. until 4:00 p.m.


[[Page 33738]]


ADDRESSES: The August 12-13 meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn 
Hotel & Suites, 625 First Street, Alexandria, VA. The Holiday Inn's 
telephone number is (703) 548-6300.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Sharie Centilla, Office of Wastewater 
Management, at (202) 260-6052 or Internet: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3350565d475a5f5f521d405b52415a56735643525e525a5f1d5643521d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4b7b1baa0bdb8b8b5faa7bcb5a6bdb194b1a4b5b9b5bdb8fab1a4b5fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>

    Dated: June 19, 1996.
Michael B. Cook,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management, Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 96-16579 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3703 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3703

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the same 
insurance reserve treatment to financial guaranty insurance as applies 
   to mortgage guaranty insurance, lease guaranty insurance, and tax-
                         exempt bond insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 1996

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the same 
insurance reserve treatment to financial guaranty insurance as applies 
   to mortgage guaranty insurance, lease guaranty insurance, and tax-
                         exempt bond insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INSURANCE RESERVE RULES FOR FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 832(e)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or a company which writes financial 
        guaranty insurance'' after ``section 103'' in the first 
        sentence, and
            (2) in the second sentence--
                    (A) by inserting ``and to financial guaranty 
                insurance'' after ``section 103;'',
                    (B) by inserting ``financial guaranty insurance 
                or'' after ``in the case of'', and
                    (C) by inserting ``such financial guaranty or'' 
                after ``revenues related to''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading for section 832(e)(6) of 
such Code is amended by inserting ``; financial guaranty insurance'' 
after ``obligations''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) provides, in pertinent part:

Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may

have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the

court determines that –

. . .

(B) the action or appeal –

. . .

(ii) fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted . . . 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

EARLAND COLLINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR, ET AL.,

Defendants.

/

Case Number: 2:08-CV-14881

HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN

ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Earland Collins, a state prisoner currently incarcerated at the Oaks Correctional

Facility in Manistee, Michigan, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. Plaintiff is proceeding without prepayment of the filing fee in this action under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(1). After careful consideration, the Court dismisses Plaintiff’s complaint, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2),1

 because Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges that the convictions for which he is currently

incarcerated are based upon false evidence, false warrants, prosecutorial misconduct, a failure to

investigate and other wrongful acts committed by defendants. 

A claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is an appropriate remedy for a state prisoner challenging
2

a condition of his confinement. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 499 (1973). In this case,

however, Plaintiff clearly seeks habeas corpus relief because his claims address the

constitutionality of his convictions. In Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994), the

Supreme Court held such claims to be improper under 42 U.S.C. § 1983:

[W]hen a state prisoner seeks damages in a § 1983 suit, the district court must

consider whether a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the

invalidity of his conviction or sentence; if it would, the complaint must be

dismissed unless plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has

already been invalidated.

Id. at 486-87. See also Schilling v. White, 58 F.3d 1081, 1085 (6th Cir. 1995) (holding that “in

order to recover damages for allegedly unconstitutional conviction or imprisonment . . . a § 1983

plaintiff must prove that the conviction or sentence has been reversed on direct appeal, expunged

by executive order, declared invalid by a state tribunal authorized to make such a determination,

or called into question by a federal court’s issuance of a writ of habeas corpus”) (internal

quotation omitted). 

A judgment in favor of Plaintiff would imply the invalidity of his convictions. Plaintiff’s

convictions have not been overturned or declared invalid. Thus, Plaintiff fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 22, 2008
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

December 22, 2008.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager
Exhibit 32.1











Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, Byung Yim, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of TRB Systems International, Inc. (the "Company") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







|                                                              |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: /s/ Byung Yim                                             |  | 
|Byung Yim, President, CEO & CFO                               |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |  | 



September 27, 2008