alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WO 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 Before the Court is Defendants Michael Lacey, James Larkin, John Brunst, and 

Scott Spear’s Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for 

Immediate Hearing (the “Motion”). (Doc. 376) In the Motion, the Defendants requests a 

stay of certain seizure warrants directed at funds in approximately nine attorney trust 

accounts.1

 (Doc. 376 at 2) For good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the relief requested in Defendants’ Emergency Motion to 

Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for Immediate Hearing (Doc. 376) is 

temporarily granted pending a hearing on the motion which is scheduled for November 

16, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 

85003 before Judge Steven P. Logan. The arguments set forth in Government’s 

 1

 Defendants move for an order staying the seizure of the attorney trust accounts identified in Doc. 374 as Account nos. 28 (Bank of the West account xxx1363), 29 

(Wells Fargo account xxxx2052), 30 (SunTrust Bank account xxxx7906), 33 (Citibank 

account xxxx4039), 34 (US Bank account xxxx1235), 35 (US Bank account xxxx6952), 

37 (JP Morgan Chase bank account xxxx4381), 38 (JP Morgan Chase bank account xxxx9698), and 40 (JP Morgan Chase bank account xxxx5397). 

United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 384 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Response in Opposition to Motions to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 371) may 

serve as its Response to the Motion. The Defendants are directed not to file a reply, but 

instead the Defendants shall come prepared to assert any arguments in reply to the 

Government’s Response at the motion hearing. 

 Dated this 15th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 384 Filed 11/15/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SAMUEL PEARSON, 

Petitioner,

Case Number 08-14422 

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

RAYMOND BOOKER,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The petitioner, Samuel Pearson, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254 that the Court denied as untimely on August 11, 2011. The Court will now consider

whether to issue a certificate of appealability.

A certificate of appealability may issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Courts must either issue a certificate

of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or provide reasons why such

a certificate should not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); In re Certificates of

Appealability, 106 F.3d 1306, 1307 (6th Cir. 1997). To receive a certificate of appealability, “a

petitioner must show that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the

petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate

to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003)

(internal quotes and citations omitted).

The petitioner filed his habeas petition after the statute of limitations had expired, and the

Court denied the petitioner’s request to equitably toll the statute of limitations because he failed to

show “‘extraordinary circumstances stood in his way’ and prevented timely filing.” Lawrence v.

2:08-cv-14422-DML-DAS Doc # 42 Filed 08/11/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2859
-2-

Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 336 (2007) (quoting Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005)). The

Court also found that the petitioner is not entitled to equitable tolling because he did not make a

credible claim of actual innocence. The Court now finds that reasonable jurists could not debate that

this Court correctly dismissed the petitioner’s claim. Therefore, the Court will deny the petitioner

a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the certificate of appealability is DENIED.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: August 11, 2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on August 11, 2011.

s/Deborah R. Tofil 

DEBORAH R. TOFIL

2:08-cv-14422-DML-DAS Doc # 42 Filed 08/11/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2860
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of POWRtec International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Grant Jasmin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Grant Jasmin By: Grant Jasmin Chief Executive Officer  Dated: May 13, 2011    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
PROB 35 Report and Order Terminating Supervised Release 

(Rev. 5/01) Prior to Original Expiration Date

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Crim. No. 08-CR-20514-01 

WILLIAMS, Michael Donnell 

On November 24, 2017 the above named commenced supervised release for a period of four years. The 

supervised releasee has complied with the rules and regulations of supervised release and is no longer in need 

of supervision. It is accordingly recommended that the supervised releasee be discharged from supervision. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Kerry F. Horton II

 United States Probation Officer

ORDER OF COURT

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the supervised releasee be discharged from supervision and 

that the proceedings in the case be terminated. 

Dated this 22nd day of February , 2021 . 

s/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge 

Case 4:08-cr-20514-SFC-MJH ECF No. 36, PageID.239 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 1
#### Eugene LACKEY, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 66298.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 21, 1995.

Charles A. Rizzo, Donna Aronoff Smith, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., James A. Chenault, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Mo. Dept, of Revenue, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment of the trial court sustaining the Director of Revenue’s suspension of his driving privileges. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order af-*826finning the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CTI Industries Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Howard W.
      Schwan, as President of the Company, and Stephen M. Merrick, as Executive
      Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Howard W.
                SchwanHoward
                W. SchwanPresidentDate:
                April 15, 2008/s/
                Stephen M.
                MerrickStephen
                M. MerrickExecutive
                Vice-President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
                April 15, 2008




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      and
      is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
      document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as
      amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
      section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
      into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
      Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically
      incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex1029a.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    AIRCRAFT
CONFIGURATION

    


    between

    


    THE
BOEING COMPANY

    


    and

    


    AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.

    


    


    Exhibit A
to Purchase Agreement Number 3219

    



    
      
        
          P.A. No.
3219                                                                  
A

          PA_Exhibit_A   Rev.: 2/22/07 

          BOEING
PROPRIETARY 

          


          


        

         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


        
          Exhibit A
to

          Purchase
Agreement No. 3219

          Page
2

        

      

    


    AIRCRAFT
CONFIGURATION

    


    Dated
                

    


    relating
to

    


    BOEING
MODEL 787 AIRCRAFT

    


    


    [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED
SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT]

     

    



    
      
        
          P.A. No.
3219                                                                  
A

          PA_Exhibit_A   Rev.: 2/22/07 

          BOEING
PROPRIETARY
Exhibit
10.35


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


 


TO


 


THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.


SENIOR EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE PLAN


 


 


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of The Ryland Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”), pursuant to its power and
authority to amend the Senior Executive Performance Plan (the “Plan”), amends
the Plan effective as of January 1, 2005, to confirm that the Plan is
exempt from the requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code as a
short-term deferral program described under Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(b)(4).


 


Accordingly, the Plan is amended by adding the
following sentence to the end of the Section titled “Bonuses”:


 


“Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the
contrary, bonuses payable pursuant to the Plan shall be paid in cash during the
two and one-half month period following the end of the year in which the bonus
is earned and vested.”


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 has been duly
executed by the Corporation, effective as of January 1, 2005.


 


 


	
  ATTEST/WITNESS 

  	
   

  	
  THE
  RYLAND GROUP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ____________________________________________________

  	
   

  	
  By:________________________________________________

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Print Name:__________________________________________

  	
   

  	
  Print Name:_________________________________________

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:______________________________________________
exv10w47






Exhibit 10.47




BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED




Compensation Table for Named Executive Officers and Directors




     Named Executive Officers:



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Current	 
	 	 	Base Salary	 
	Chad C. Deaton 1
	 	$	1,155,000	 
	Peter A. Ragauss
	 	 	568,000	 
	Alan R. Crain
	 	 	473,000	 
	David H. Barr
	 	 	450,000	 
	Martin S. Craighead
	 	 	450,000	 






     Non-Employee Directors3:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Cash Retainer:
	 	$	75,000	 
	Audit/Ethics Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	 	$	20,000	 
	Other Committee Chairman Annual Retainer:
	 	$	15,000	 
	Audit/Ethics Committee Members Retainer:
	 	$	10,000	 
	Other Committee Members Retainer
(Excluding Executive Committee):
	 	$	5,000	 
	Lead Director
	 	$	15,000	 
	Annual Non-Retainer Equity (restricted stock awarded in January,
stock options awarded 50% in January and 50% in July of each
year):
	 	$	200,000	 








 




			
	1	 	Mr. Deaton has an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Baker Hughes Incorporated,
filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 19, 2008.
	 
	2	 	In addition to their base salaries, these named executive officers, at the discretion of the
Board of Directors can receive equity compensation pursuant to the 2002 Director & Officer
Long-Term Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibits 10.23, 10.24 and 10.25 to Annual Report of
baker Hughes Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. These named
executive officers also are entitled to participate in the Company’s Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan, as amended and restated, filed as Exhibits 10.15 and 10.16 to Annual Report
of Baker Hughes Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
	 
	3	 	Non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and related expenses.
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Casey Container Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
R Nason, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                              /s/ Martin R Nason
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Martin R Nason
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              November 14, 2011

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Whitney Bernstein (949) 369-3700 November 10, 2021 Bienert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP 903 Calle Amanecer Suite 350 San Clemenete CA 92673 2:18-cr-0422-DJH Susan Brnovich May 3, 2021 United States v. Michael Lacey et al Phoenix Arizona ✔

✔

May 3, 2021 Motion Hearing ✔

wbernstein@bklwlaw.com /s/ Whitney Z. Bernstein November 10, 2021 ✔

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1386 Filed 11/10/21 Page 1 of 1
Order entered November 21, 2012

In The

 ourt o[

 igtritt ol !l exa at

No. 05-12-01313-CV

INSURANCE ALLIANCE, Appellant

VO

LAI~ TEXOMA HIGHPORT, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-0604-397

ORDER

The Court has before it court reporter Paula Thomas’s November 19, 2012 request for an

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The Court GRANTS the request and ORDERS

Ms. Thomas to file the reporter’s record by December 3, 2012.

MOLLY

JUSTICE
Management Bonus Plan, as amended December 15, 2008



 Exhibit 10.15 
 RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
 AMENDMENT TO RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC. MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN

 This Amendment to the Riverbed Technology, Inc. Management Bonus Plan (the “Plan”) by Riverbed Technology,
Inc. (the “Company”) is effective December 15, 2008. 
 WHEREAS, the Company originally adopted
the Plan effective as of May 29, 2007 to motivate participants to achieve excellent shot and long term financial performance of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend certain provisions of the Plan in order to come into documentary compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), and any final regulations and official guidance promulgated thereunder (together, “Section 409A”) so as to avoid the imposition of the additional tax imposed under Section 409A, as set
forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. Timing of Payment. The Plan is hereby amended by replacing the existing Section 4.2 in its entirety with the following new Section 4.2
to provide as follows: 
 “4.2 Timing of Payment. Subject to
Section 3.5, payment of each Actual Award shall be made as soon as administratively practicable, as determined in the sole discretion of the Company, but in no event later than the 15th
 day of the 3rd month after the end of the applicable Performance Period or Progress Period.”

 2. Section 409A. The Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 8.6 to provide as follows:

 “8.6 Section 409A. It is intended that this Plan comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 986, as amended, and the final regulations and other official guidance thereunder (“Section 409A”) so that none of the payments hereunder will be subject to the additional tax imposed under Section 409A, and any ambiguities
herein will be interpreted to so comply.” 
 3. Full Force and Effect. To the extent not expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect. 
 4. Successors and Assigns. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder
shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, their respective successors, assigns, and legal representatives. 
 5. Governing
Law. This Amendment will be governed by the laws of the State of California (with the exception of its conflict of laws provisions). 
 (signature page to follow) 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company executed
this Amendment this 15th day of December 2008, effective as of the date first set forth above. 
  

							
	ATTEST:	 	  
	 	By:	 	 /s/ Randy S. Gottfried

		 		 		 	Randy S. Gottfried
		 		 	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer