alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Helen Mayfield v. North Village Green I, Homeowner's Association, 

Inc., James Patrick Kennedy, An Individual, Duane T. Corley, An 

Individual Jointly and Severally

Appellate case number: 01-12-00748-CV

Trial court case number: 1137087

Trial court: 55th District Court of Harris County

The trial court signed a final judgment in the above-referenced case on May 2, 2013. 

The district clerk has filed a record on indigence. The record reflects that, on August 27, 2012, 

appellant, Helen Mayfield, filed an affidavit in the trial court, seeking to establish indigence for 

costs of appeal. See TEX. R.. CIV. P. 20.1. The record contains a contest and order on appellant’s 

affidavit of indigence for trial court costs under Rule of Civil Procedure 145; however, the record 

does not reflect that a contest was filed to appellant’s affidavit of indigence for costs of appeal. 

Accordingly, the allegations in the affidavit are deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed 

on appeal without advance payment of costs. TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1.

The Clerk of this Court shall make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant is 

indigent and is allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of costs.

The district clerk is ordered to file in this court, within 30 days of the date of this order 

and at no cost to appellant, the clerk’s record in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 34.5.

The court reporter is ordered to file in this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order 

and at no cost to appellant, the reporter’s record in the appeal, or a notice that no record was 

taken. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1, 34.6.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 12, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32773-32774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16175]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

President's Export Council; Meeting

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Export Council (PEC) will hold a full Council 
meeting to discuss topics related to export expansion. The closed 
session will include briefings on trade negotiations with China, 
barriers to trade and other sensitive matters properly classified under 
Executive Order 12958. The portion of the meeting that will be open to 
the public will provide an overview of Commerce Secretary Kantor's 
recent trip to the ASEAN countries.
    The President's Export Council was established on December 20, 
1973, and reconstituted May 4, 1979, to advise the President on matters 
relating to U.S. trade. It was most recently renewed on September 29, 
1995, by Executive Order

[[Page 32774]]

12974. A Notice of Determination to close meetings or portions of 
meetings of the Council to the public on the basis of 5 U.S.C. 
5522b(c)(1) has been approved in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. A copy of the notice is available for public inspection 
and copying in the Central Reference and Records Inspection Facility, 
Room 6204, U.S. Department of Commerce, 202-482-4115.

DATES: July 1, 1996.

TIME: 2:00 P.M.-3:30 P.M.; Closed Meeting. 3:30 P.M.-4:00 P.M.; Open 
Meeting.

ADDRESSES: The Secretary's Conference Room, Room 5851, U.S. Department 
of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20230. This program is physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Linda Breslau, President's Export 
Council, Room 2015B, Washington DC 20230. Seating is limited and will 
be on a first come, first serve basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sylvia Prosak or Linda Breslau, 
President's Export Council, Room 2015B, Washington D.C. 20230.

    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Sylvia Lino Prosak,
Staff Director and Executive Secretary, President's Export Council.
[FR Doc. 96-16175 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0147

IN THE MATTER OF:

R.S.,

Respondent and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2022

08/31/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0147
#### Demetrius SLAUGHTER, Defendant-Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent.

No. 63361.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Aug. 31, 1993.

*845S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for defendant-movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Demetrius Slaughter, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for illegal sale of cocaine near a school and possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for a total of ten years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 99.4








CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Siga Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Rohit Singh, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Date: December 9, 2009








ROHIT SINGH


Rohit Singh


Chief Accounting Officer


Chief Financial Officer and Director








-1-
#### Antonio WILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 50898.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 13, 1996.

Rosemary E. Percival, Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Wiley pled guilty to one count each of voluntary manslaughter, § 565.023, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of ten years imprisonment on the voluntary manslaughter count and five years imprisonment on the armed criminal action count. He filed a Rule 24.035 motion to vacate the judgment and sentences in which he claims that he erroneously believed that he was pleading guilty to involuntary manslaughter rather than voluntary manslaughter, and that his counsel coerced him into pleading guilty. After an evidentia-ry hearing, the motion court denied the motion.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 84.16. In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-37379; File No. 265-19]


Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee (``Committee'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission's Consumer Affairs 
Advisory Committee will meet on July 22, 1996, in Room 1C30 at the 
Commission's Headquarters, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
beginning at 9:45 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public. This 
notice also serves to invite the public to submit written comments to 
the Committee.

ADDRESSES: You should submit written comments in triplicate and refer 
to File No. 265-19. Send your comments to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20549.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan M. Gottsegen, Counsel to the Director, Office of Investor 
Education and Assistance (202) 942-7040; Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app 10a, requires the Securities and Exchange 
Commission to give notice that the Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee 
will meet on July 22, 1996, in Room 1C30 at the Commission's 
Headquarters, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC., beginning at 9:45 
a.m. The meeting will be open to the public.
    The Committee's responsibilities include assisting the Commission 
in identifying investor problems and being more responsive to their 
needs. The Committee will explore fundamental issues of concern to 
investors, including matters currently under consideration by the 
Commission and topics of emerging concern to investors and the 
financial services industry.

    Dated: June 28, 1996.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-17143 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33570-33571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Revocation of License of Specialized Small Business Investment 
Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Order of the United States District 
Court of New Mexico, dated March 21, 1988, the United States Small 
Business Administration hereby revokes the license of Fluid Financial 
Corporation, a New Mexico Corporation, to function as a specialized 
small business investment company under the Small Business Investment 
Company License No. 06/06-5249 issued to Fluid Financial Corporation on 
December 10, 1982 and said license is hereby declared null and void as 
of January 16, 1996.

United States Small Business Administration.


[[Page 33571]]


    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 96-16420 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Cosme ADAN, Appellant.

No. WD 50031.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 30, 1996.

James C. Cox, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown,, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Direct appeal of convictions for one count of assault in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Ecoland
      International, Inc. for the quarter ending November 30, 2007, I, David Wallace,
      Chief Financial Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
      that:




1.  Such
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending November 30, 2007, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
      ending November 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Ecoland International,
      Inc.




Dated:
      January 14, 2008.




/s/
                David WallaceDavid Wallace, Chief Financial Officer
October 25, 2023

Sent via email to:

The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Court- Pheonix Division

Sandra Day O'Connor U. S. Courthouse

401 W. Jefferson Strett, SPC 625

Courtroom 605

Phoenix, AZ 85004 

humetewa_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov 

Criminal Justice Act (CJA) Unit- Phoenix Division 

cja_evoucher@azd.uscourts.gov 

Re: USA v. Michael Lacey, et al., CR18-00422-PHX-DJH

Letter of Explanation for 3 Day Expedited Transcript Request 

Your Honor:

CJA Defense counsel is respectfully requesting the transcripts for all witnesses on October

23 and October 24, 2023. I am requesting a 3 day-turn around. The reason for the 

expeditious turnaround time is due to the numerous evidentiary rulings and guidance by the 

Court regarding subject matters that are or are not permissable. The transcripts are 

necessary for effective examination within the evidentiary bounds set by this Court. 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Eric W. Kessler

EWK/jk

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1907-1 Filed 10/25/23 Page 1 of 1
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CARL G. STAMM, JR., DOC #230783, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-806 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 19, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Carl G. Stamm, Jr.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KELLY and SALARIO, JJ., and CASE, JAMES, R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Faraud K. Muhammad, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) The Governorto the CIA ofIllinois 

### et al. ) ) Defendants. ) Civil ActionNo.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED JUN - 52009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 

# 1046

Plaintiff, proceeding

### pro se, has submitted seven complaints each accompanied by an applicationto proceed 

### informapauperis. In each complaint, plaintiffsues "secret CIA" agents and in five complaints he adds "[t]he Governorto the CIA ofIllinois" andofficers ofthe DeKalb, Illinois, police department. Because the Court will dispose ofthe seven complaints in the same manner, it will consolidate them into one civil action, grant plaintiffs 

### informa pauperis application and dismiss the case as frivolous. I Plaintiffis a homeless individual in the District ofColumbia. He accuses the defendants ofvarious misdeeds, including poisoning him withtoxic material and transferring "certain [of his] brainwave frequencies" to CIA headquarters and the basement ofthe DeKalbpolice department to monitor his activities. Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios
are subject to immediate dismissal. 

### See Neitzke v. 

### Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989); 

### Best v.

I In proceedings where leave to proceed 

### informapauperis is granted, the Court must "dismiss the case at any time [it] determines that
... the action
... is frivolous." 28 U.S.C. § 1915( e)(2)(B)(i). In addition to "The Governor to the CIA ofIllinois" and the DeKalbpolice department, the named defendants, as consolidated, are: "Secret CIA Agents" Mariah, Star, Al Ousli, Tim Bowden, Stephanie Knudson, JohnMuhammad, Elois D. Harris, Medinah Harris, Mecca Muhammad, Naoki Harris, NadarMuhammad, Vekie Harris, B Littlejohn, Sharon Littlejohn, Tina Harris, Tiffany Harris and ErickaLittlejohn and Police Officers Melissa Hernandez, Tim Moore and Lt. Dan Gerace.

### Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Moreover, a complaint maybe dismissed as frivolous when it lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v. District of Columbia Bd. of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Because each consolidated complaint qualifies for such treatment, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order issued contemporaneously.

Date: May

# ~, 2009

- 2 -
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Jeffery Thompson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Solutions Mechanical, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: October 9, 2007  /s/ Jeffery Thompson Jeffery Thompson Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard Lyle PLAUTZ, Appellant, v. Mary Lou PLAUTZ, Respondent.

No. WD 42467.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 3, 1990.

*903Joe D. Holt, Fulton, for appellant.

Milton B. Garber, Fulton, for respondent.

Before MANFORD, P.J., and KENNEDY and TURNAGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband Richard L. Plautz appeals the $800 per month permanent maintenance award, $100 per month child support award and the division of property in a decree of dissolution dated September 1, 1989.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 49 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

LACEY, ET AL.,

Defendants.

No. CR 18-422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO LATE FILE 

REPLY ON DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S 

OPPOSITION IN RESPONSE TO UNITED 

STATES’ APPLICATION FOR ORDER 

REGARDING CRIMINAL FORFEITURE OF 

PROPERTY IN GOVERNMENT CUSTODY 

(First Request)

Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Late File 

Reply on Defendant James Larkin’s Opposition in Response to United 

States’ Application for Order Regarding Criminal Forfeiture of 

Property in Government Custody (First Request), and good cause 

appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

DATED this _____ day of __________, 20 ___.

____________________________

HON. STEVEN P. LOGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 303-2 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,662
<SECURITIES>                                    13,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                       271
<INVENTORY>                                        163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,319
<PP&E>                                           3,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,720
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,373
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,696
<OTHER-SE>                                       (566)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,324
<SALES>                                          9,110
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,252
<CGS>                                            1,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,688
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    40
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,087)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,087)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.24)


</TABLE>