alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32430-32431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15966]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP96-211-001 and RP95-197-012]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 18, 1996.
    Take notice on June 13, 1996, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets 
which tariff sheets are listed below. The proposed effective date is 
June 1, 1996.

Sub 3rd Revised First Revised Sheet No. 339
Sub 4th Revised First Revised Sheet No. 339

    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Order issued May 29, 1996 in Docket Nos. RP96-
211-000, RP95-197-010, and RP95-197-011. The May 29 Order, inter alia, 
accepted certain tariff sheets to be effective June 1, 1996 and 
directed Transco to file, within 15 days of such order, revisions to 
Section 28.4 of the General Terms and Conditions of its Volume No. 1 
Tariff to (i) eliminate the statement that Section 28.4 only deals with 
interruptible services and (ii) include the priority and method of 
curtailment to be used For Transco's firm services that are not 
considered secondary as defined in Section 2 of Transco's firm 
transportation rate schedules. In compliance with such directive 
Transco has eliminated the reference to ``interruptible'' in Section 
28.4 and included a new Section 28.4(d) to its General Terms and 
Conditions.
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing to 
customers, State

[[Page 32431]]

Commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15966 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### M. Anthony FRANKENREITER, Claimant/Respondent, v. MARRS-WINN COMPANY, Employer/Appellant, and Argonaut Insurance Company, Insurer.

No. 68087.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Nov. 21, 1995.

David S. Ware, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, for appellant.

Philip M. Hess, Randall, Keefe & Griffiths, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., and SIMON, J, and WILLIAM E. TURNAGE, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the temporary or partial award of the Administrative Law Judge allowing compensation. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 245 Filed 08/02/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 245 Filed 08/02/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 245 Filed 08/02/18 Page 3 of 3
EX-10.9.2



 Exhibit 10.9.2 
 [Network18 Company’s Logo] 
 19 December, 2012 

To, 
 TV18 HSN Holdings Limited

 10, Diomidous Street, 
 Alphamega
Akropolis Building, 
 3rd Floor, Office 401, 2024 Nicosia, 
 Cyprus 
 REFERENCE: Trademark License Agreement dated 1st September, 2012 (“Agreement”) 

SUBJECT: First Addendum to the Agreement (“First Addendum”). 
 Dear Sir, 
 This is in reference to the Agreement between Network18 Media & Investments
Limited (“Licensor”) and TV18 HSN Holdings Limited (“Licensee”) and our subsequent discussions on amending the terms of the Agreement. 
 This letter records the mutual understanding between the Licensor and Licensee to amend the terms of the Agreement as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 	Schedule A to the Agreement is hereby replaced with the Schedule A annexed to this First Addendum. 


 

	 	2.	 	Except as provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain same. 

 Request you to please accord your approval to this First Addendum. 
 For Network18 Media &
Investments Limited, 
  

	
	 /s/ RDS Bawa

	(Authorized Signatory)
	Name: RDS Bawa
	Designation: Group CFO
	
	 





	Accepted
	For TV18 HSN Holdings Limited
	(Authorized Signatory)
	Name: CCY MANAGEMENT LIMITED
	Designation: Director

  

	
	[Letterhead for Network18 Media & Investment limited]








 SCHEDULE A TO TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT 

 

	1.	 	Licensor Trademarks shall include the “18” name and logo and any other aspects of Licensee’s trade/service names/dress/logo in which Licensor has
a proprietary interest. 

 “18 Logo”
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                           ILINC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


         The following table sets forth the Company's earnings to fixed charges
for the periods indicated:


                                                          YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                         2007    2006     2005
                                                        ------  -------  -------
                Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)   1:1    (a)       (a)


(a)        Due to the loss recorded in 2006 and 2005, the ratio coverage was
           less than 1:1. The Company would have needed to generate additional
           earnings of $1.3 million, and $5.2 million to achieve a ratio
           coverage of 1:1 in 2006 and 2005.

           For the purposes of computing the consolidated ratio of earnings to
           fixed charges, earnings consist of income before income taxes and
           extraordinary items. Fixed charges consist of interest on all
           indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, and that
           portion of rental expense that the Company believes to be
           representative of interest.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ecoland
International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 2008, I, David
Wallace, Chief Executive Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:




1.  Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending August 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ending August 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Ecoland International,
Inc.




Dated:
January 15, 2009.




/s/  David
  WallaceDavid
      Wallace, Chief Executive Officer ofEcoland
      International, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16543]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CA-010-1430-00; CACA 8151]


Order Providing for Opening of Lands Subject to Section 24 of the 
Federal Power Act; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order opens, subject to section 24 of the Federal Power 
Act (FPA), approximately 0.02 acres of public land withdrawn by a 
Federal Power Commission order, dated July 18, 1949, for Power Project 
Number 2019. This action will permit consummation of a pending land 
exchange and retain the power rights to the United States of America. 
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has determined that the 
power value of the subject land will not be injured or destroyed by 
their exchange, if the land exchange is subject to section 24 of FPA. 
FERC concurred with this action in a letter, DVCA-1240, dated June 14, 
1996. Although the land has been and will remain closed to mining, it 
has been and will remain open to mineral leasing.

DATES: June 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Duane Marti, BLM California State 
Office (CA-931.4), 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825-1889, 916-
979-2858.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By virtue of the authority vested in the 
Secretary of the Interior by the Act of June 10, 1920, Section 24, as 
amended, 41 Stat. 1075; 49 Stat. 846; 62 Stat. 275; 16 U.S.C. 818, and 
pursuant to the determination by the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission in DVCA-1240, it is ordered as follows:
    1. At 8:30 a.m. on June 29, 1996, the following described land 
withdrawn by a Federal Power Commission order, dated July 18, 1949, for 
Power Project Number 2019, will be opened to disposal by land exchange 
subject to the provisions of Section 24 of the Federal Power Act as 
specified by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in determination 
DVCA-1240, and subject to valid existing rights, the provisions of 
existing withdrawals, and the requirements of applicable law:

Mount Diablo Meridian

T. 4 N., R. 14 E.,
    Sec. 34, that portion of lot 15 located within the project 
boundary of Power Project 2019.

    The area described contains approximately 0.02 acres in 
Calaveras County.

    2. The State of California has waived its right of selection in 
accordance with the provisions of section 24 of the Federal Power Act 
of 16 U.S.C. 818 (1988), as amended.

    Dated: June 21, 1996.
David McIlnay,
Chief, Branch of Lands.
[FR Doc. 96-16543 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    DOC has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance the following proposal for collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-
13.
    Agency: Bureau of Export Administration.
    Title: One-Time Report for Foreign Software or Technology Eligible 
for De Minimis Exclusion.
    Form Number: Not applicable.
    OMB Approval Number: 0694-0101.
    Type of Request: Renewal of an existing collection.
    Burden: 250 hours
    Number of Respondents: 10.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: 25.
    Needs and Uses: Any company that is seeking exemption from export 
controls on foreign software and technology commingled with U.S. 
software or technology must file a one-time report for the foreign 
software or technology. The report must include the percentage of 
relevant values in determining U.S. content, assumptions, and the basis 
or methodologies for making the percentage calculation. The 
methodologies must be based upon accounting standards used in the 
operation of the relevant business, which must be specified in the 
report. The information will be used to determine if the exclusion 
applies.
    Affected public: Individuals, businesses or other for-profit and 
not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion--one report per exclusion requested.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: Victoria Wassmer (202) 395-7340.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, Acting DOC Forms Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Victoria Wassmer, OMB Desk Officer, Room 
10202, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: June 25, 1996.
Linda Engelmeier,
Acting Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 96-16828 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ARELIOUS RAY REED,

Plaintiff,

v.

OBSERVER & ECCENTRIC MIRROR

NEWSPAPERS,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 08-14835

Honorable John Corbett O’Meara

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Arelious Ray Reed filed a pro se complaint against defendant Observer & Eccentric

Mirror Newspapers along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Complaints filed in forma pauperis are subject to the screening requirements of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2). Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 866 (6th Cir. 2000). Section 1915(e)(2) requires

district courts to screen and dismiss complaints that are frivolous, fail to state a claim upon which

relief can be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

In this case plaintiff Reed has failed to specify a federal question upon which relief may be

granted, and the parties to this action are not citizens of different states. Therefore, the court lacks

federal subject matter jurisdiction to hear the matter.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff Reed’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is

GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Reed’s complaint is DISMISSED.

5:08-cv-14835-JCO-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 03/11/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 10
2

It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Reed’s application for appointment of counsel is

DENIED AS MOOT.

s/John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

Date: March 11, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this

date, March 11, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager

5:08-cv-14835-JCO-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 03/11/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 11
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16150]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Corps of Engineers, DOD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 10 (a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law (92-463) announcement is made of the next meeting of 
the Inland Waterways Users Board. The meeting will be held on 31 July 
1996 at the Thunderbird Hotel in Bloomington, Minnesota, (Tel. (612) 
854-3411 or 800-328-1931). Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the 
meeting is scheduled to adjourn at 4 p.m. The meeting is open to the 
public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file 
statements with the committee at the time and in the manner permitted 
by the committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Norman T. Edwards, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 
CECW-PD, Washington, DC 20314-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-16150 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-4 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 357
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-4 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 358
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOE ROSS TAYLOR,

Plaintiff,

v.

ERIC EBERSOLD, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 08-14083

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District 

of Michigan, on October 29, 2008.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Joe Ross Taylor (“Plaintiff”), who is currently incarcerated at the Wayne County

Jail, initiated this pro se civil rights action against Eric and “Dorthy” Ebersold

(collectively referred to as “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the

Western District of Michigan on September 4, 2008. On September 23, 2008, the

Honorable Gordon J. Quist issued an order transferring Plaintiff’s case to this Court. On

October 1, 2008, this Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment

of fees. Nonetheless, the Court summarily dismissed the complaint for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted because Plaintiff appeared to be asserting Fourth

and Fourteenth Amendment violations against private actors. Presently before the Court

is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Allow Me to State a Claim on which Relief May be Granted and
2

that Mrs. Dorthy Ebersold Got the Rope that Mr. Ebersold Tied Around My Neck and

Nose.” The Court will treat the motion as one for reconsideration.

Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 7.1(g) provides that a motion for

reconsideration should be granted only if the movant demonstrates that the court and the

parties have been misled by a palpable defect and that a different disposition of the case

must result from correction of that defect. E.D. Mich. LR 7 .1(g). A motion that merely

presents the same issues already ruled upon by the court shall not be granted. Id.

Other than the motion’s title, the entire content of Plaintiff’s motion reads, “Joe

Ross Taylor by Joe r. Taylor pro-se moves this Court to allow me to proceed with my

complaint. My claim for relief is Mentel [sic] Anguish, Pain and Suffering, and Racial

Intimidation.” Plaintiff’s motion fails to set forth any actionable civil rights claim against

the Ebersolds or identify a “palpable defect” that misled the Court when it summarily

dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Joe Ross Taylor

#0645806

Wayne County Jail 

525 Clinton Street

Detroit, MI 48226
SCPW-20-0000774

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

DENNIS C. DEREGO, Petitioner,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CASE NO. 2FC151000209)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.,

with Wilson, J., dissenting)

Upon consideration of petitioner Dennis C. DeRego’s

petition for writ of mandamus, filed on December 29, 2020, the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and

the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that

he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief and

has alternative means to seek relief, including seeking relief in

the circuit court through a Hawai#i Rules of Penal Procedure Rule

40 petition or seeking relief from the Hawai#i Paroling

Authority, as provided by law. Petitioner, therefore, is not

entitled to the requested extraordinary writ from this court. 

See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999)

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000774

16-FEB-2021

01:43 PM

Dkt. 7 ODDP
(a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not

issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable

right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress

adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). 

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus

without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 16, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33509]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3651]


Illinois Tool Works Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order requires Illinois Tool Works, among 
other things, to divest all of Hobart Brothers' assets and businesses 
relating to industrial power sources and industrial engine drives to 
Prestolite Electric Inc. or another Commission-approved acquirer.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued April 23, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC, 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann Malester, FTC/S-2308, Washington, DC, 20580. (202) 326-2682.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, February 8, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 4778, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Illinois Tool Works Inc., for 
the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to divest, as set 
forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition of this 
proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16479 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M