alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 971 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 971

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 15, 2009.
Whereas the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), an 
        independent panel of experts in primary care prevention and evidence-
        based medicine, issued guidelines on November 16, 2009, regarding 
        mammography screening for women, including women age 40 to 49;
Whereas these guidelines reflect a change from USPSTF mammography 
        recommendations issued in 2002;
Whereas the new guidelines have caused concern among many health providers and 
        confusion among many women age 40 to 49;
Whereas the Department of Health and Human Services has stated that while the 
        USPSTF has presented some new evidence for consideration, the policies 
        of the Department remain unchanged; and
Whereas the Department of Health and Human Services has stated that there is a 
        great need for more evidence, more research, and more scientific 
        innovation to help women prevent, detect, and fight breast cancer: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) the guidelines of the United States Preventive Services Task 
        Force (``USPSTF'') would not prohibit an insurer from providing coverage 
        for mammography services in addition to those recommended by the USPSTF 
        and should not be used by insurers to deny coverage for services that 
        are not recommended on a routine basis; and
            (2) the National Cancer Institute should continue to invest and 
        provide leadership regarding research to develop more effective 
        screening tools and strategies for improving detection of breast cancer.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

May 15, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-15462

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00063-CR-5-MCR-MD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

LUIS SALVADOR SAUCEDO-GONZALEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(May 15, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, ANDERSON and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Luis Salvador Saucedo-Gonzalez in
2

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Saucedo-Gonzalez’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Saucedo-Gonzalez’s motion for

appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0372 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRYCE CALEB HAMERNICK,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 21, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 12 2022

09/12/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0372
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1163 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1163

To add 1 member with aviation safety expertise to the Federal Aviation 
              Administration Management Advisory Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To add 1 member with aviation safety expertise to the Federal Aviation 
              Administration Management Advisory Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL.

    Section 106(p)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``13 members'' and inserting ``14 members''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``10 members 
        representing aviation interests'' and inserting ``11 members 
        representing aviation interests, including at least 1 member 
        specifically representing aviation safety interests''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS & CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS,
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR RANDALL'S FOOD MARKETS,
INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998
<CASH>                                          36,243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    166,332
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,540
<PP&E>                                         365,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 883,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,855
<BONDS>                                        337,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,580
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   883,747
<SALES>                                      2,419,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,419,023
<CGS>                                        1,755,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  592,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,949
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,466
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,736
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,736
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.23**

**ITC^DeltaCom, Inc.**

**Description of Non-Employee Director Compensation**

Non-employee directors of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) who are not members of or affiliated with the Welsh, Carson, Anderson &Stowe group of the Company’s stockholders (“WCAS”) or with Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC (“TCP”) receive cash fees for their service on the board of directors of the Company and on committees of the board, and allnon-employee directors are eligible to receive equity-based fees pursuant to the ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan for their board and committee service. 

Eligible directors who are not employees of the Company receive annual fees of $30,000, fees of $1,000 for each board or committee meeting attended inperson and fees of $500 for each board or committee meeting attended by conference telephone. The chairman of the audit committee receives an additional annual fee of $5,000. All such fees are paid in cash. All directors are entitled toreimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenditures. 

Non-employee directors also are eligible to receive awards ofrestricted stock units and other awards pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan upon their initial appointment to the board of directors and from time to time thereafter. Such awards, if any, are made at the discretion of the board.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 985 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 985

Of inquiry directing the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
 Agency to transmit to the House of Representatives all information in 
the possession of the Administrator relating to nutrient management of 
          the Illinois River Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

 Mr. Boozman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Of inquiry directing the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
 Agency to transmit to the House of Representatives all information in 
the possession of the Administrator relating to nutrient management of 
          the Illinois River Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to transmit to the 
House of Representatives, not later than 30 days after the date of 
adoption of this resolution, copies of all documents, including 
unredacted hard copies and electronic documents, in the possession of 
the Administrator relating to nutrient management of the Illinois River 
Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 3 Filed 11/12/08 Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Silverstar Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



3. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: August 17, 2012 | By: | /s/ Neil Kleinman      
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                      |     | Neil Kleinman          
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 10

Dockets.Justia.com
EXHIBIT 7 
EXHIBIT 7 

Objectionable Fees 

Excessive Coverage at a Deposition 

Date Attorney Time Fee 

10/08/2009 Cody 2.33 700.00

10/08/2009 Cody 5.50 1,650.00

10/19/2009 Kay 4.08 612.00

09/15/2009 Rao .50 125.00

09/15/2009 Rao 6.00 1,500.00

09/22/2009 Rao 3.00 750.00

09/22/2009 Rao .58 145.83

10/20/2009 Rao 3.50 875.00

Grand Total 25.49 $6,357.83

264249
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16111]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-AGL-20]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Bigfork, MN; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the airspace description of 
the Bigfork, MN, Class E airspace published in a final rule on May 2, 
1996 (61 FR 19541), Airspace Docket Number 95-AGL-20.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John A. Clayborn, Air Traffic Division, Operations Branch, AGL-530, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 2300 East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, 
Illinois 60018, telephone (847) 294-7568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Document 96-10972, Airspace Docket 95-AGL-20, 
published on May 2, 1996 (61 FR 19541), established the Class E 
airspace at Bigfork, MN. Errors were discovered in the legal 
description. This action corrects the spelling of Bigfork and adds the 
airport name, city and state in the title of the legal description.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
airspace legal description, as published in the Federal Register on May 
2, 1996 (61 FR 19541), (Federal Register Document 96-10972; page 19542, 
column 1), is corrected in the legal description to the incorporation 
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 as follows:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

* * * * *

AGL MN E5 Bigfork, MN [Corrected]

Bigfork Municipal Airport, MN
    (Lat. 47 deg.46'45''N, long, 93 deg.39'01''W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within a 7-mile radius of the Bigfork Municipal Airport.
* * * * *
    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on June 3, 1996.
Maureen Woods,
Manager, Air Traffic Division.
[FR Doc. 96-16111 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Casey Container Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin R Nason,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            /s/ Martin R Nason
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Martin R Nason
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            May 16, 2011

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________ No. 97-30009 Summary Calendar

____________________ JAMES EDWARD GRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ECKERD CORPORATION; GARY GADDY, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1153)

_________________________________________________________________ October 2, 1997 Before SMITH, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

James Edward Grant appeals from an adverse judgment a nd the denial of his motion for jud gment as a matter of law, or for new trial, followi ng an adverse jury verdict on his race-based
termination claims against Eckerd Corporation. The basis given by
Eckerd for his termination was falsification of an employee’s payroll records.G rant contends that the district court reversibly erred by

excluding evidence, under F ED . R. E V ID . 403, that Gaddy, Eckerd’s

area operations man ager and Grant’s supervisor, never promoted a
black assistant manager to manager and that Grant was the only
black manager in Gaddy’s district. Grant asserts also that the jury verdict was clearly contrary to the evidence.
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in excluding the evidence and that, based on the evidence, a rational juror could have reached hte verdict adverse to Grant. Accordingly, the judgment is

AFFIRMED
.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeurogesX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeurogesX, Inc.

Dated: May 8, 2009



By:

/s/ Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonnoPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)By:

/s/ Stephen F. GhiglieriStephen F. GhiglieriChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16074]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. GT96-67-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 19, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 14, 1996, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1 the following revised 
tariff sheets to become effective July 13, 1996.

First Revised Sheet No. 3
Sheet Nos. 684-723
First Revised Sheet No. 724

    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets reflect the 
Commission's Regulations which state that any service contract that 
deviates in any material respect from the form of service agreement 
must be filed with the Commission and such non-conforming service 
agreement must be referenced in the pipeline's tariff.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commissions in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16074 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
ex1059.htm


    
 

    
      December
4, 2008

       

      Mr. Ray
M. Robinson

      Citizens
Trust Bank

      75
Piedmont Avenue

      Atlanta,
GA 30303

      


      Dear
Ray:

       

      This will
confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2009.

       

      1.           All
director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your
service on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR
Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009, will be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this
letter agreement.

       

      2.           Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures
for Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).

       

      3.           On
the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock
Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid
to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by
the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”)
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any
affiliates, and cease rendering services.  Payment cannot be
accelerated.

       

      4.           In
the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of
death will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the
calendar month immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to Arlane
Robinson.  The payment contemplated by this paragraph 4 will be made
on the 30th
business day following the date of your death.

       

      If the
foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the
originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.

       

      


       

      


      Very
truly yours,

       

      /s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly

      Kenneth
W. Wimberly

      Corporate
Secretary

      


      


      


      


      


      Accepted
and agreed:

      


      


      /s/ Ray
M. Robinson

      Ray M.
Robinson