alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

Leonard Green 

Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 

POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE 

CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 

Tel. (513) 564-7000 

www.ca6.uscourts.gov

 Filed: September 13, 2010 

Mr. David J. Weaver 

U.S. District Court 

for the Eastern District of Michigan 

231 W. Lafayette Boulevard 

Fifth Floor Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse 

Detroit, MI 48226-0000 

 Re: Case No. 09-1395 , Warrior Sports, Incorporated, et al v. NCAA

Originating Case No. : 08-14812 

Dear Clerk, 

 Enclosed is a copy of the mandate filed in this case. 

 Sincerely yours, 

 

 

s/Sue Burlage 

Case Manager 

Direct Dial No. 513-564-7012 

 

cc: Mr. Charles N. Ash Jr. 

 Mr. Michael G. Brady 

 Mr. John J. Bursch 

 Mr. Gregory L. Curtner 

 Mr. David R. Grand 

 Mr. William R. Jansen 

 Ms. Kimberly K. Kefalas 

 Mr. Aaron D. Lindstrom 

 Mr. Todd M. Neckers 

 Mr. Robert J. Wierenga 

Enclosure 

 

2:08-cv-14812-MOB-MKM Doc # 23 Filed 09/13/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 455 Case: 09-1395 Document: 006110730388 Filed: 09/13/2010 Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

 

________________ 

 No: 09-1395 

________________ 

 

 Filed: September 13, 2010 

WARRIOR SPORTS, INCORPORATED, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant 

 

ATHLETE'S CONNECTION, 

 Plaintiff 

v. 

NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, 

 Defendant - Appellee 

 

MANDATE

 Pursuant to the court's disposition that was filed 08/20/2010 the mandate for this case hereby 

issues today. 

 

COSTS: None 

2:08-cv-14812-MOB-MKM Doc # 23 Filed 09/13/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 456 Case: 09-1395 Document: 006110730388 Filed: 09/13/2010 Page: 2
#### Duane Terry GLASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64255.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Sept. 20, 1994.

Application to Transfer Denied Dec. 20, 1994.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

*MEMORANDUM OPINION*

Movant appeals from the denial of his post guilty plea Rule 24.035 motion. The findings of fact of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears and an opinion would have no precedential value. *659Movant’s contention regarding improper venue is legally incorrect. Sec. 541.070 RSMo 1986.

Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
H. Res. 973 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 16, 2009. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of December 16, 2009. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

ROBERT LEVANDER,

Plaintiff, Case Number 08-14241

v. Honorable David M. Lawson

I.C. SYSTEM, INC.,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER STRIKING REPLY BRIEF

On April 28, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a late reply brief. He also filed

the reply brief in question. The Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a reply brief out

of time. Therefore, the reply brief was filed in violation of the local rules, and will be stricken.

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff’s reply brief [dkt. #39] is STRICKEN.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 5, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 5, 2009.

s/Lisa M. Ware 

LISA M. WARE

Case 2:08-cv-14241-DML-VMM ECF No. 49, PageID.466 Filed 05/05/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN MICHIGAN 

COLMAR USA, INC., 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

 Case No. 08-cv-14793 

v 

 Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

ROBERT SOMMA, 

 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER P.L.C THE MUNGO LAW FIRM, P.L.C. 

Timothy S. Arnold (P54442) Leonard Mungo (P43562) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant 

4301 Fashion Square Boulevard 333 West Fort, Suite 1500 

Saginaw, MI 48603 Detroit, MI 48226 

(989) 498-2100 (313) 963-0407 

timarn@bkf-law.com mungoll6@msn.com 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING

PRESERVATION AND INSPECTION OF SUBJECT SHEAR-BALER

The parties, through their respective counsel, having conferred regarding preservation of 

the subject machine, hereby stipulate and agree to entry of the following protective order. 

 WHEREFORE, in recognition of the parties foregoing stipulated agreement, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 A. Robert Somma shall preserve the subject Shear-Baler in its current condition 

without further modification, alteration or repair; and 

 B. Robert Somma shall allow Colmar USA, Inc. to inspect and test the subject 

Shear-Baler as necessary for purposes of this lawsuit. 

2:08-cv-14793-PJD-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 02/25/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 38
 S/Patrick J. Duggan 

 Patrick J. Duggan 

 United States District Judge 

Dated: February 25, 2009 February 25, 2009 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on 

February 25, 2009February 25, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

 S/Marilyn Orem 

 Case Manager 

Approved for entry: 

___s/with consent of Leonard Mungo

The Mungo Law Firm 

333 West Fort, Suite 1500 

Detroit, MI, MI 48226 

(313) 963-0407

mungoll6@msn.com 

P43562 

___s/Timothy S. Arnold_________ 

Braun Kendrick Finkbeiner P.L.C. 

4301 Fashion Square Boulevard 

Saginaw, MI 48603 

 (989) 498-2100 

timarn@bkf-law.com

P54442 

2:08-cv-14793-PJD-MJH Doc # 11 Filed 02/25/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 39
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-128742) of Mittal Steel Company N.V. and related Prospectus and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-107102) pertaining to the Ispat International N.V. Global Stock Option Plan, of our reportdated February 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholder’s equity and cash flows of Mittal Steel Holdings N.V. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, included inthis Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Rotterdam, The Netherlands 

April 15, 2007 

for Ernst & Young Accountants 

/s/ M. Coenradie
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer May 15, 2008
**EXHIBIT 10.10**

**FIRST AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THEFIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**, made as of the 1st day of January 2005, by and betweenCOMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Employer”), and ROBERT B. HARRIS, PH.D. (the “Executive”). 

**WHEREAS**, the Employer and the Executive previously entered into a First Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2005 (the “Initial Agreement”); and 

**WHEREAS**, the Initial Agreement contained an equation to determine certain performance-based cash, restricted stock and incentive option bonuses;and 

**WHEREAS**, the Employer and the Executive wish to amend the Initial Agreement to correct a mathematical error contained therein.

**NOW, THEREFORE**, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto,the Employer and the Executive hereby amend the Initial Agreement as follows: 

1. The equation contained in Section 4(b) is herebyremoved in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“A + (A * (1-B)) = C” 

2. The equation contained in Section 4(e)(i) is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“2,500 + (2,500 * (1 – A)) = B” 

3. The equation contained in Section 4(e)(ii) is hereby removed in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“2,500+ (2,500 * (1 – A)) = B” 

4. All other portions of the Initial Agreement remain in effect. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, this Agreement has been executed as a sealed instrument by the Employer, byits duly authorized officer, and by the Executive, as of the date first above written. 

 

COMMONWEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By:
 /s/ Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
Name:
 Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
Title:
 Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
Date:
 2/1/06 /s/ Robert B. Harris, Ph.D. Robert B. Harris, Ph.D.
Address:
 601 Biotech Drive              Richmond, Virginia 23235
Date:
 2/1/06
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ARTHUR JOHNSON JR.,

Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 08-14305

v.

DIST. JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN

RICK GOOD, TIMOTHY HARRIS,

and JULIE CABAL,

Defendants.

___________________________________ /

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION IN FAVOR OF GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

REMAND THIS MATTER TO STATE COURT

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s December 4, 2008, Report and Recommendation

in favor of granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand this Matter to State Court. (Dkt. No. 11). Having

reviewed that Report and Recommendation, and there being no objections, the Court enters as its

findings and conclusions the Report and Recommendation GRANTING Plaintiff’s Motion to

Remand this Matter to State Court. 

SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 30, 2008

2:08-cv-14305-PDB-VMM Doc # 15 Filed 12/30/08 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 119
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

December 30, 2008.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14305-PDB-VMM Doc # 15 Filed 12/30/08 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 120
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1154 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to facilitate emergency medical 

services personnel training and certification curriculums for military veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. ENZI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to facilitate emergency medical services personnel training and certification curriculums for military veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans to Para5 medics Transition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PER7 SONNEL TRAINING FOR VETERANS. 

8 Section 330J(c)(8) of the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 254c–15(c)(8)) is amended by inserting before 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 1154 IS

1 the period the following: ‘‘, including, as provided by the 

2 Secretary, may use funds to provide to military veterans 

3 required coursework and training that take into account, 

4 and are not duplicative of, previous medical coursework 

5 and training received when such veterans were active 

6 members of the Armed Forces, to enable such veterans 

7 to satisfy emergency medical services personnel certifi8 cation requirements, as determined by the appropriate 

9 State regulatory entity’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Micah Fialka−Feldman,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:08−cv−14922−PJD−VMM

Hon. Patrick J Duggan

Oakland University Board of

Trustees, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT

 Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court

reporter/transcriber in the above−captioned matter. The parties have twenty−one (21) calendar

days from the filing of the transcript to file with the court and court reporter/transcriber a

Redaction Request of this transcript. If no such request is filed, the transcript may be made

remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.

 Any party needing a copy of the transcript to review for redaction purposes may purchase a

copy from the court reporter/transcriber or view the document at the Clerk's Office public

terminal.

s/ N Matthews 

Certification

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

s/ N Matthews 

Dated: February 3, 2010
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-5 Filed 02/11/19 Page 11 of 11
EX-10.4






Exhibit 10.4









	 	 	 
	To:

	 	Paul M. Mendlik
	From:

	 	West Corporation Compensation Committee
	Date:

	 	February 23, 2009
	 
	 	 
	Re:

	 	Exhibit A





This Exhibit A for 2009 is entered into pursuant to your Employment Agreement.





	1.	 	Your base salary will be $450,000.






	2.	 	Effective January 1, 2009, you will be eligible to receive a performance bonus based upon
West Corporation’s Adjusted EBITDA less interest income and unrealized synergies
(“Compensation Adjusted EBITDA”) growth for West Corporation in 2009. Compensation Adjusted
EBITDA for each quarter will be compared to the same quarter in the previous year to advance a
pro-rata portion of the bonus. Each $1M increase in Compensation Adjusted EBITDA for the year
over 2008 Compensation Adjusted EBITDA will result in a $14,865 bonus. If any portion of the
bonus is advanced, 75% of the pro-rata bonus will be paid within thirty (30) days from the end
of the quarter. 100% of the total bonus earned will be paid within thirty (30) days of the
final determination of 2009 Compensation Adjusted EBITDA.





Should Compensation Adjusted EBITDA exceed $671M for the year, you will eligible to receive
$18,580 for every $1M of Compensation Adjusted EBITDA above that threshold.



In the event there is a negative year-to-date profit calculation at the end of any quarter
and a pro-rata portion of the bonus has been advanced in a previous quarter, “loss carry
forward” will result and applied to the next quarterly or year-to-date calculation.




	3.	 	All objectives are based upon West Corporation operations and will not include results
derived from mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or stock buy backs except to the extent
approved by West Corporation’s Compensation Committee.






	4.	 	At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, you may receive an additional bonus based on
the Company’s and your individual performance.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	           /s/ Paul M. Mendlik
 	 
	 	Employee – Paul M. Mendlik
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. John R. JONES, Appellant. John R. JONES, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 62397, 64146.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 7, 1993.

Neil J. Bruntrager, Mary P. Sehroeder, Bruntrager *&*Billings, P.C., St. Louis, for appellant.

*896Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

*PER CURIAM.*

Defendant, John R. Jones, appeals from his convictions, after a jury trial, of unlawful use of a weapon, exhibiting, assault in the third degree and tampering with a witness. He was sentenced as a prior offender to three years for unlawful use of a weapon, one year for assault in the third degree and three years for tampering with a witness to run concurrently with each other. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion on defendant’s direct appeal. Defendant’s conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Defendant’s convictions and denial of defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2009 of UTEC, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such
report.  Very truly yours,   /s/
Fortunato VillamagnaFortunato VillamagnaChief Executive OfficerNovember
17, 2009Howard BouchChief Financial OfficerDated: November 17, 2009   A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to UTEC, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Amyris 2012 10-K Ex 4.14 1.5% Senior Unsecured Convertible Note (December 24, 2012) (2)






Schedule A
(see Exhibit 4.02 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed on November 9, 2012)
Notes Issued by Registrant
	
					
	Note Number
	Date of Note
	Amount
	Conversion Price
	Comments

	R-1
	July 30, 2012
	$38,300,000
	$7.0682
	Note No. R-1 was cancelled pursuant to Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 24, 2012 (Exhibit 4.16 Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2012 as filed on March 2013).  The new issued Note is No. R-3.

	R-2
	September 14, 2012
	$15,000,000
	$7.0682
	 

	R-3
	December 24, 2012
	$33,300,001.04
	$7.0682
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

RONALD TALLQUIST , 

Plaintiff,

 -vs- Case No. 08-13922

Hon. Stephen J. Murphy

LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.P., 

Defendant. 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL of LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.P. 

WITH PREJUDICE

The Plaintiff dismisses all claims against LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, L.P. with

prejudice and without costs, sanctions, or attorneys fees.

Respectfully Submitted,

ADAM G. TAUB & ASSOCIATES

CONSUMER LAW GROUP, PLC

By: s/ Adam G. Taub_________

Adam G. Taub (P48703)

Attorney for Ronald Tallquist 

18930 West Ten Mile Rd, Ste 2500

Southfield, MI 48075

(248) 746-3790

adamgtaub@clgplc.net

Dated: October 14, 2008

Case 2:08-cv-13922-SJM-MKM ECF No. 4, PageID.10 Filed 10/14/08 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33550-33551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL(S):

    (1) Collection title: Request for Medicare Payment.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: G-740S, HCFA-1500.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0131.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: July 31, 1996.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: See Justification (Item 
No. 12).
    (8) Total annual responses: 1.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 1.

[[Page 33551]]

    (10) Collection description: The Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) 
administers the Medicare program for persons covered by the railroad 
retirement system. The collection obtains the information needed by the 
MetraHealth Insurance Company, the RRB's carrier, to pay claims for 
services covered under Part B of the program.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-16447 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2008
    by:
    /s/ Martin R. GausvikMartin R. GausvikExecutive Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer