alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 10, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36398-36399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17442]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 96-070]


NASA Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: July 24, 1996, 9 a.m. to 2 p.m.; and July 25, 1996, 9 a.m. to 3 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Room 9H40, 
300 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Anne L. Accola, Code Z, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001, 202/358-0682.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Update on NASA Activities
--Cross-fertilization between Codes S and Y
--Bion Task Force
--Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle Program
--Reusable Launch Vehicle Program
--Cassini Environmental Assessment
--Summary of Air Force Science Advisory Board New Vistas Report
--Committee/Task Force Reports
--Discussion of Issues Regarding NASA Questions
--Discussion of Findings and Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register. Due to unavoidable 
circumstances, this Federal Register notice is being published less

[[Page 36399]]

than 15 days prior to the date of the meeting.

    Dated: July 2, 1996.
Alan M. Ladwig,
Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-17442 Filed 7-9-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
#### DICK SMITH FORD, INC., Plaintiff, System One Rent A Car, Inc., et al., Appellant, v. Jonni PANNELL, Respondent.

No. WD 51222.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 5, 1995.

*847Jeffrey R. Lang, Kansas City, for appellant.

Ronald McClary, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and ULRICH and SMITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for summary judgment and the sustaining of respondent’s motion for summary judgment after joint motions for summary judgment.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
[No. 33321.

*En Banc.*

August 13, 1957.]

#### Annie Brenner, *Respondent,*v. The J. J. Brenner Oyster Company, *Appellant.*The J. J. Brenner Oyster Company, *Appellant,*v. John W. Shugarts et *al., Respondents.**1*

*O’Leary, Meyer & O’Leary,*for appellant.

*Smith Troy*and *Philip*W. *Richardson,*for respondents.

W. *E. Evenson*and *Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann, amici curiae*on petition for rehearing.

1

Reported in 314 P. (2d) 417.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing *En Banc,*a majority of the court adhere to the *En Banc*opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 48 Wn. (2d) 264, 292 P. (2d) 1052.
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:09-cr-20025-AC-SDP Document 3 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Masaaki (John) Nishibori, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2009



/s/    MASAAKI (JOHN) NISHIBORIMasaaki (John) NishiboriPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**(Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley)**

 

I, Jeffrey M. Watson, President and Chief Executive Officer ofManhattan Bancorp, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Bancorp;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) internal controls over the financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a.               designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be  designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant ismade known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;

 

b.              evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based upon our evaluation; and

 

c.               disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control that occurred duringthe registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a.               allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.              anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: November 12, 2008 | /s/ Jeffrey M. Watson                  |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                         | Jeffrey M. Watson                      |
|                         | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERENCE ALVIN JOHNSON,

Petitioner, No. 09-cv-10395

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

JEFFREY WOOD,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION FOR HEARING

This matter is presently before the Court on Habeas Corpus Petitioner Terence

Johnson’s “Emergency Motion for Hearing with Emergency Entrance into Federal

Witness Protection.” In this motion, Petitioner complains about certain correction

officers’ actions with regard to his personal property, searches conducted on him and his

property for contraband, grievances he filed with the MDOC, and “other crimes”

committed against him during his incarceration. As relief, Petitioner seeks an injunctive

order providing for his entrance into the Federal Witness Protection Program.

All of these “conditions of confinement” matters of which Petitioner complains

are not cognizable in this habeas corpus action. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475,

498–99, 93 S.Ct. 1827, 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973) (petitioner’s complaints about the

conditions of his confinement, as opposed to the constitutionality of his conviction are

not cognizable in federal habeas corpus). See also Kirby v. Dutton, 794 F.2d 245, 248

(6th Cir.1986); Hodges v. Bell, 170 F. App’x. 389, 392 (6th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nelson v.

2:09-cv-10395-GER-PJK Doc # 42 Filed 12/06/13 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2364
Campbell, 541 U.S. 637, 643, 124 S.Ct. 2117, 158 L.Ed.2d 924 (2004) (“claims that

merely challenge the conditions of a prisoner’s confinement, whether the inmate seeks

monetary or injunctive relief, fall outside of that core [of habeas corpus]”). Kendrick v.

Brunsman, 2007 WL 4246206, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Nov.28, 2007) (“petitioner’s claims

relating to the conditions of his confinement or treatment by prison officials are not ...

properly considered in these habeas corpus proceedings”). Rather, “a prisoner

complaining about the conditions of his confinement should bring suit under 42 U.S.C. §

1983.” Young v. Martin, 83 F. App’x 107, 108–09 (6th Cir.2003) (citing Prieser, 411

U.S. at 498–99); Wright v. Lazaroff, 643 F. Supp. 2d 971, 991–92 (S.D. Ohio 2009);

Austin v. Bell, 927 F. Supp. 1058, 1066 (M.D. Tenn.1996).

Because the complaints Petitioner makes in his Emergency Motion are not

cognizable in this habeas corpus action, Petitioner’s Motion [Dkt. Nos. 39 and 40] will

be DENIED, without prejudice to Petitioner’s right to file a civil rights complaint raising

these issues pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

SO ORDERED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: December 6, 2013

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on December 6, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135

2:09-cv-10395-GER-PJK Doc # 42 Filed 12/06/13 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2365
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34804-34805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 34805]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-593-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

June 27, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 24, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
(Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West Virginia 
25314-1599, filed a request with the Commission in Docket No. CP96-593-
000, pursuant to Sections 157.205, and 157.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
establish an additional point of delivery for transportation service to 
Pennzoil Products Company (Pennzoil) authorized in blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000), all as more fully set forth in the 
request on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Columbia proposes to construct and operate an addition point of 
delivery for interruptible transportation service to Pennzoil in Boone 
County, West Virginia. Columbia states that the additional point of 
delivery has been requested by Pennzoil for transportation service for 
residential service. The cost to establish the additional point of 
delivery is estimated at $11,452. Columbia reports that Pennzoil has 
agreed to reimburse Columbia for the total cost of the delivery point.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16928 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 366

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to apply to Hispanic-serving

institutions of higher education the same student loan default rate limitations applicable to historically Black colleges and universities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

A BILL

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to apply to

Hispanic-serving institutions of higher education the

same student loan default rate limitations applicable to

historically Black colleges and universities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO DEFAULT RATE LIMITATION

4 PROVISIONS.

5 Section 435(a)(2)(C) of the Higher Education Act of

6 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1085(a)(2)(C)) is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as

8 clauses (iii) and (iv), respectively; and
2

•HR 366 IH

1 (2) by inserting after clause (i) the following

2 new clause:

3 ‘‘(ii) an Hispanic-serving institution within

4 the meaning of section 316(b)(1) of this Act;’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter Blackmore, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.

Date: February 4, 2011



By:

/s/ Peter BlackmoreName:

Peter BlackmoreTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies this Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenced into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made on or before or after the date of this Report), irrespective at any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# AGENCY:

Department of Education. 

# ACTION:

Correction notice. 

# SUMMARY:

On July 22, 2008, a 30-day notice (Vol. 73, Number 141, page 42552) was published for the information collection, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) Regulatory Requirements. In that notice 1,666,013 responses were provided. This correction notice provides the correct number of responses as 19,958,860. The burden hours remain the same at approximately 1,666,014 hours. 

The Acting IC Clearance Official, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Dated: July 25, 2008. 

Kate Mullan, 

Acting Leader, Information Policy and Standards Team,  Regulatory Information Management Services,  Office of Management.

[FR Doc. E8-17453 Filed 7-29-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ADIL SHAFI, an individual,

Counter-Plaintiff,

vs Case No: 09-10454

Honorable Victoria A. Roberts

BRAINTECH INC., and

FREDERICK WEIDINGER, an 

individual,

Counter-Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

On September 15, 2010, the Court held a status telephone conference. Attending

were James Murphy representing Adil Shafi, Susan Koval representing Braintech and

Geoffrey Greeves representing Frederick Weidinger.

Based on the conversation, the Court orders that the deposition of Adil Shafi will

be continued in Michigan, not to exceed 4 hours.

IT IS ORDERED. 

 /s/ Victoria A. Roberts 

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge

Dated: September 17, 2010

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of

record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

September 17, 2010.

s/Linda Vertriest 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 41 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Dongmei Wu, the Chief Financial Officer of China Skyrise Digital
Service Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 16th day of
August, 2010.

/s/ Dongmei WuDongmei
WuChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and will be retained by China Skyrise Digital
Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.

---
# uawr ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 14-14-00534-CR 

### STYLE: Jacov Nixon vThe State ofTexas COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed 

### DATE: August 18. 2015 Publish: No 

### OFFENSE: Aggravated Sexual Assault COUNTY: Montgomery 

## TRIALCOURT: 9th District Court TC CASE #: 12-05-05609 CR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### STYLE:Jacov Nixon v The State of1 CCA# rexas
Petition CAIS: 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: 

# i*aj-/r FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN C 

# DATE: ll/jLS/20ir JUDGE: rA ULUJU*- PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR FOR REHEAR JUDGE: ING IN CCA IS:
ELECTRONIC RECORD
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

CR-18-422-PHX-SPL (BSB) 

ORDER

Upon the motion of the United States, and good cause showing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the United States’ motion to extend time to 

file its reply to the Defendant’s Opposition to United States’ Motion to Resolve Privilege 

Issues and Cross-Motion to Obtain Discovery and Address Privilege Issues (Doc. 226) to 

August 10, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) is 

found to commence from _________________ through __________________.

DATED this _______ day of __________, 2018.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 229-1 Filed 07/24/18 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERWOVEN
INC'S REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRELY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,983
<SECURITIES>                                    61,129
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                       288
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,152
<PP&E>                                           4,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,739
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,340
<SALES>                                         10,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,806
<CGS>                                              181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,655)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.79)


</TABLE>