alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-Q of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the nine months ended October 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edwin
Morrow, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.

Date: December 13, 2011


/s/ EDWIN MORROW
------------------------------------
Edwin Morrow
Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16058]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Rhode Island Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Rhode Island Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 11, 1996, at the 
Brown University Center for the Study of Race & Ethnicity Conference 
Room, 150 Power Street, Providence, Rhode Island 02904. The purpose of 
the meeting is to plan future projects.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Dr. Robert G. 
Lee, 401-863-1693, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional 
Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, June 13, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-16058 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 50806 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Eduardo Reyes**

**- Aguilar,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 1422

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eduardo Reyes

Aguilar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes

- Aguilar has not filed a r esponse. We

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 11, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50806 Document: 00516089865 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/11/2021No. 20

- 50806

2 have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2

. Case: 20-50806 Document: 00516089865 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/11/2021
discretion, Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 

P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and a petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating 

that extraordinary relief is warranted, Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 

120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). 

Gazlay argues that the State failed to present exculpatory 

evidence to the grand jury and that unrelated and irrelevant testimony 

was introduced at the grand jury proceeding. "Dismissal of an indictment 

on the basis of governmental misconduct is an extreme sanction that 

should be utilized infrequently." Lay v. State, 110 Nev. 1189, 1198, 886 

P.2d 448, 454 (1994). The defendant must show substantial prejudice, or a 

reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different absent 

the misconduct, in order to warrant dismissal of an indictment. Id.; see 

also Sheriff v. Keeney, 106 Nev. 213, 216, 791 P.2d 55, 57 (1990). 

We conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted. 

Gazlay fails to demonstrate a reasonable probability that the grand jury 

would not have found probable cause existed to indict him had the letter 

been introduced or had the unrelated testimony been omitted. Therefore, 

Gazlay fails to demonstrate that the district court manifestly abused its 

discretion by denying his pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 

Rugamas v. Eighth Judicial Din. Court, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 46, 30 P.3d 

887, 895-96 (2013) (a district court manifestly abuses its discretion by 

denying a pretrial habeas petition when there is no legal evidence to 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
Pairaguirre 

u-k 

satisfy the elements of the charged offenses in a challenged indictment). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

Cherry 

fACS 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge 

Steven Christopher Gazlay 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A .0
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patricia Niu, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/S/    PATRICIA NIU                       
|Patricia Niu                              
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|August 11, 2008                           

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of
the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.
Exhibit 99.1


                        Liberty Mint, Ltd.


                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     I, Daniel R. Southwick, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Liberty Mint Ltd. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S,C, Section 1350, that:

(1)     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: April 14, 2003
                                    /s/ Daniel R. Southwick
                                   ____________________________________
                                   Daniel R. Southwick
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3668

To require the Secretary of Defense to provide back pay to the Vietnamese

commandos who were employed by the United States during the Vietnam

conflict to conduct covert operations in North Vietnam so as to compensate the commandos for the years in which they were imprisoned

and persecuted in Vietnam.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 18, 1996

Mr. DORNAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Defense to provide back pay

to the Vietnamese commandos who were employed by

the United States during the Vietnam conflict to conduct

covert operations in North Vietnam so as to compensate

the commandos for the years in which they were imprisoned and persecuted in Vietnam.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF BACK PAY TO VIETNAMESE

4 COMMANDOS.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Viet6 namese commando’’ means a Vietnamese national who
2

•HR 3668 IH

1 was employed by the United States during the Vietnam

2 conflict to conduct covert operations to infiltrate North

3 Vietnam and who was captured and imprisoned by the

4 North Vietnamese during the course of such operations.

5 (b) PAYMENT OF BACK PAY.—From funds available

6 to the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary shall pay to

7 each Vietnamese commando living in the United States

8 who submits a timely claim under subsection (c) an

9 amount of back pay equal to the product of the following:

10 (1) $2,000, which corresponds to the annual

11 salary accepted by Vietnamese commandos during

12 the Vietnam conflict; and

13 (2) The number of years in which the Vietnam14 ese commando was imprisoned by the North Viet15 namese and the number of years after such impris16 onment in which the Vietnamese commando was

17 subject to persecution in Vietnam as a result of serv18 ice as a Vietnamese commando, as determined by

19 the Secretary.

20 (c) SUBMISSION OF CLAIMS.—To receive back pay

21 under this section, a Vietnamese commando shall submit

22 an application to the Secretary, in such form and contain23 ing such information as the Secretary considers appro24 priate, before the end of the two-year period beginning on

25 the date on which the Vietnamese commando receives no-
3

•HR 3668 IH

1 tice under subsection (d) of the availability of compensa2 tion.

3 (d) NOTIFICATION OF VIETNAMESE COMMANDOS.—

4 As soon as possible after the date of the enactment of this

5 Act, the Secretary shall endeavor to notify each Vietnam6 ese commando living in the United States on that date

7 of the availability of back pay under this section. The Sec8 retary shall provide notice to other Vietnamese comman9 dos as soon as possible after they resettle in the United

10 States.

11 (e) EFFECT OF PAYMENT.—The payment of back

12 pay to a Vietnamese commando under this section shall

13 be in full satisfaction of any claim of the Vietnamese com14 mando against the United States arising out of the service

15 of the person as a Vietnamese commando.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,902
<SECURITIES>                                   208,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                  274,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,109
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       479,702
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   495,137
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,467
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,159
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,159
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,159
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant
to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Steven R.
Springsteel, Chief Executive Officer of Chordiant Software, Inc. (the “Company”)
and Peter S. Norman, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:




1.
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
2008, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual
Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and




2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 20th day
of November, 2008.





/s/  STEVEN
      R. SPRINGSTEELSteven
      R. Springsteel, Chairman, President, and
              Chief
      Executive Officer/s/  PETER
      S. NORMANPeter
      S. Norman, Chief Financial Officer and
              Principal
      Accounting Officer




This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Chordiant Software, Inc. under the Securities Act
of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Corixa
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002, the undersigned, Steven
Gillis, Ph.D, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Corixa
Corporation, and Michelle Burris, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Corixa Corporation, do each hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
            December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

                  (2) the information contained in Annual Report on Form 10-K
            for the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Corixa Corporation.

Date:  February 25, 2003                    By:   /s/ STEVEN GILLIS
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Steven Gillis, Ph.D.
                                                  Chairman of the Board
                                                  and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 25, 2003                    By:   /s/ MICHELLE BURRIS
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Michelle Burris
                                                  Senior Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00471-CV

In re John M. Sigman

D. H. a/k/a D. T., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-FM-11-000099, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of D. H. a/k/a D. T. The subject

of this proceeding is John M. Sigman, appellant’s attorney.

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on July 16, 2012, and her brief was due

September 25, 2012. On September 28, 2012, we ordered counsel to file appellant’s brief no later

than October 15, 2012. On October 22, 2012, Mr. Sigman submitted a motion to extend the deadline

for filing appellant’s brief. Appellant’s brief, however, has not been filed.

On October 23, 2012, John M. Sigman was ordered to appear in person before this

Court on Wednesday, November 14, 2012, at 9:00 a.m., in the courtroom of this Court, to show

cause why he should not be held in contempt and have sanctions imposed for his failure to obey our
September 28, 2012, order. This order provided that Mr. Sigman would be relieved of his obligation

to appear before this Court as ordered above if the Clerk of this Court received appellant’s brief

before November 14, 2012.

The show cause hearing was held in this Court on November 14, 2012, and Sigman

appeared as ordered. At the time of the hearing, appellant’s brief had not been filed.

After consideration of the record and Sigman’s explanation for failure to complywith

our previous orders, we specifically find that John M. Sigman is in contempt for violating this

Court’s order of September 28, 2012, which was sufficientlyclear and specific in its requirement that

appellant’s brief was to be filed by October 15, 2012. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 21.002

(West 2004).

John M. Sigman is hereby fined $100 payable to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals,

Third District of Texas, on or before December 14, 2012, by 5:00 p.m. If Sigman fails to pay the

$100 fine by December 14, 2012, he shall be confined in a county jail or other lockup within the

State for a sufficient time to discharge the full amount of the fine at the daily rate allowed for

prisoners servingmisdemeanor services. See In re Miles, 55 S.W.3d 203, 204 (Tex. App.—Houston

[1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). It is ordered that all writs and other process necessary for the

enforcement of this judgment be issued.

We further abate this appeal and remand the cause to the district court with

instructions to appoint new counsel for appellant by November 21, 2012. The district court shall

orderthe appropriate supplemental clerk’s record to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later

than December 5, 2012.

2
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Abated

Filed: November 14, 2012

3
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Promotions On Wheels Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on
Amended Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry Van Wie, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:   /s/ Barry Van Wie

Barry Van Wie

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Accounting Officer



Dated: May 31, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16601]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (96-065)]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Containerless Processing, Inc., 
of Evanston, Illinois, has applied for an exclusive, license to 
practice the invention described in U.S. Patent No. 4,521,854, entitled 
``Closed Loop Electrostatic Levitation System,'' which was issued on 
June 4, 1985, to the United States of America as represented by the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to 
the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Thomas H. Jones, 
Patent Counsel, NASA Management Office-JPL.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by August 27, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas H. Jones, Patent Counsel, NASA Management Office-JPL, Mail SPJ, 
Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818) 354-5179.

    Dated: June 24, 1996.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-16601 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M