alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. George WILLIS, Appellant. George WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 66161.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 15, 1996.

Raymund J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, George Willis, appeals the judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, RSMo § 195.202 (1994), and unlawful use of a weapon, RSMo § 571.030 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of conviction is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1316-000]


TransAlta Enterprises Corporation; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 24, 1996.
    TransAlta Enterprises Corporation (TransAlta) filed an application 
for authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and for certain 
waivers and authorizations. In particular, TransAlta requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by TransAlta. On 
June 12, 1996, the Commission issued an Order Granting Late 
Intervention, Accepting Market-Based Rates, and Granting Waivers and 
Authorizations (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's June 12, 1996 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by TransAlta 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, TransAlta is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and to assume obligations or liabilities as guarantor, 
endorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of TransAlta, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
TransAlta's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. * * 
*.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 12, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16534 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Working Group on Guidance for Selecting and Monitoring Service 
Providers Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefits 
Plans; Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, a 
public meeting of the Working Group on Guidance for Selecting and 
Monitoring Service Providers of the Advisory Council on Employee 
Welfare and Pension Benefits Plans will be held on July 16, 1996, in 
Room S3215 A & B, U.S. Department of Labor Building, Third and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    The purpose of the meeting, which will run from 9:30 a.m. to noon 
and from 1 to 3:30 p.m., is for the group to determine whether its 
focus will be on what type of general guidance would be useful to 
fiduciaries who must select and monitor service providers for plans or 
whether its focus should be narrowed to specific service providers such 
as investment consultants and investment managers.
    The group also plans to conduct an informal survey on codes of 
conduct in the plan community to establish current industry practices.
    Members of the public are encouraged to file a written statement 
pertaining to any topic concerning ERISA by submitting 20 copies on or 
before July 5, 1996, to Sharon Morrissey, acting executive secretary, 
ERISA Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5677, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Individuals or 
representatives of organizations wishing to address the Working Group 
on Guidance for Selecting and Monitoring Service Providers should 
forward their request to the acting executive secretary or telephone 
(202) 219-8753. Oral presentations will be limited to 10 minutes, but 
an extended statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with 
disabilities, who need special accommodations, should contact Sharon 
Morrissey by July 10, 1996, at the address indicated in this notice.
    Organizations or individuals may also submit statements for the 
record without testifying. Twenty (20) copies of such statements should 
be sent to the Acting Executive Secretary of the Advisory Council at 
the above address. Papers will be accepted and included in the record 
of the meeting if received on or before July 5.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of June 1996.
Olena Berg,
Assistant Secretary, Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-17046 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-M
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC,the manager of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 13, 2008                      |            |
|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
|                                            |
| By                                              | /s/ Paul Morton |   |
| Paul  Morton                                    |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               |
|                                                 |                 |  |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

In re: Ex Parte Application of Apotex

Inc. for Order To Obtain Discovery

for Use in Action Pending Before the

Federal Court of Canada

 Court of Canada

Case No. 2:08-mc-51095

Judge: Hood, Denise Page

ORDER

This Court having considered the ExParte Application of Apotex Inc. for an Order

Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a) To Obtain Discovery for Use in Action Pending Before the

Federal Court in Canada ("the Application"), which seeks deposition and document discovery

from Milton L Hoefle, 1020 Belmont Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2818, George Bobowski,

3376 Tacoma Circle, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1746, Sylvester Klutchko, 5143 Pratt Road, Ann

Arbor, MI 48103, and John Topliss, 364 Ausable Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, and good

cause having been shown therefor, the Court finds that the conditions and factors to be

weighed by the Court warrant the exercise of the Court’s discretion and favor granting the

relief requested in the Application.

It is, therefore, on this 4TH day of December, 2008, by the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Michigan, hereby

ORDERED that the Application be and is hereby APPROVED; and it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the Applicant shall serve Subpoenas for documents and

testimony in the forms attached as Attachments A, B, C and D to the Application, commanding

Milton L. Hoefle, 1020 Belmont Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, George Bobowski, 3376 Tacoma

Circle, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, Sylvester Klutchko, 5143 Pratt Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, and

John Topliss, 364 Ausable Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 to produce the documents requested in

the Subpoenas within 30 days of service at the offices of Howard & Howard, One North
2

Building, Ste. 300, 101 N. Main Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, and to appear for

depositions a week later, or at such other time as may be convenient to the parties, at that same

location, before a Notary Public (or other person duly qualified to administer an oath), which

shall be recorded stenographically and by video. 

SO ORDERED.

S/Denise Page Hood 

Denise Page Hood

United States District Judge

Dated: December 4, 2008

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 4, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Lisa Ware for William F. Lewis 

Case Manager
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33510-33511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16405]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Public Health Service; Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels

AGENCY: Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion.


[[Page 33511]]


ACTION: Extension of Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is providing 
notice of an extension of the time deadline for submission of written 
comments.

DATES: Written comments on the scope and intent of the Commission's 
objectives must be received by 5:00 p.m. E.D.T. on August 30, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Kenneth D. Fisher, Ph.D., Executive Director, Commission on 
Dietary Supplement Labels, Office of Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion, Room 738G, Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence 
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth D. Fisher, Ph.D., (202) 690-7102.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 103-417, Section 12, authorized 
the establishment of a Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels whose 
seven members have been appointed by the President. The appointments to 
the Commission by the President and the establishment of the Commission 
by the Secretary of Health and Human Services reflect the commitment of 
the President and the Secretary to the development of a sound and 
consistent regulatory policy on labeling of dietary supplements.
    The Commission is charged with conducting a study and providing 
recommendations for regulation of label claims and statements for 
dietary supplements, including the use of supplemental literature in 
connection with their sale and, in addition, procedures for evaluation 
of label claims. The Commission is expected to evaluate how best to 
provide truthful, scientifically valid, and non-misleading information 
to consumers in order that they may make informed health care choices 
for themselves and their families. The Commission's study report may 
include recommendations on legislation, if appropriate and necessary.
    Notices announcing meetings of the Commission on Dietary Supplement 
Labels were published on February 1, 1996 (61 FR 3714), February 1, 
1996 (61 FR 3714), February 23, 1996 (61 FR 7005), March 29, 1996 (61 
FR 14102), April 4, 1996 (61 FR 15076), and May 16, 1996 (61 FR 24798). 
Each notice also indicated that written comments on the tasks of the 
Commission were due on June 30, 1996. This notice is to provide an 
extension of the deadline for receiving comments.

    Dated: June 13, 1996.
Claude Earl Fox,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health (Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion).
[FR Doc. 96-16405 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Order of the United States District 
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, dated September 6, 1984, 
the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the 
license of Inverness Capital Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, to 
function as a small business investment company under the Small 
Business Investment Company License No. 03/02-0273 issued to Inverness 
Capital Corporation on October 1, 1969 and said license is hereby 
declared null and void as of April 5, 1995.

United States Small Business Administration.
    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 96-16421 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 of WebSafety, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rowland
W. Day II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ Rowland W. Day IIRowland
      W. Day IIPrincipal
      Executive Officer




Dated:
April 8, 2010




This
certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to WebSafety, Inc. and will be retained and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

 

 
| **Parent**                          |   | **Subsidiary**                      |   | **Percent  of  Ownership** |   | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation  or Organization** |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| First SecurityFed Financial,  Inc.  |   | First Security Federal Savings Bank |   | 100                        | %      | Federal                                             |   |
| First Security Federal Savings Bank |   | Western Security Corporation        |   | 100                        | %      | Illinois                                            |   |

 

----
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

 

			
	No. ......	 	 . . . . . . Shares


 NW18 HSN Holdings PLC 
 Incorporated in Cyprus under the Companies Law, Cap 113 - Registration No. HE 175604 
 Authorised Share Capital: USD ...... 
 (divided into .....
(number and class) shares of USD 0.04 each 
 Issued Capital: USD ...... 

Subscribed shares: ..... (number and class) shares of USD 0.04 each 

This is to certify that .....(name) of .....(address) is the Registered Proprietor of .....(number and class) Shares of USD 0.04 each in the
above-named Company, numbered from ..... to ..... inclusive, subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company, and that upon each of such Shares the sum of USD 0.04 has been paid. 

Given under the Common Seal of the above Company, this ..... day of ....., 2014 

 

					
			
	  	 		 	  
	  .....	 		 	
	  Director	 		 	Secretary

 NOTE.- No transfer of any of the above-mentioned Shares can be transferred until this Certificate has been
deposited at the Company’s Office.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20023-03

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

DERRICK JAMES MOORE,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On August 24, 2009, the case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. The Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me

on August 24, 2009. In open court I examined the Defendant under oath, confirmed the

Defendant’s consent, and then advised and questioned the Defendant regarding each of the

inquiries prescribed by Rule 11(b) of the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Based

upon the Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND 1) that the Defendant is

competent to tender a plea, 2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made, and 3)

that the offense(s) to which he pled are supported by an independent basis in fact containing

each of the essential elements of the offense. Therefore, I have ordered the preparation of a

presentence investigation report.

Case 1:09-cr-20023-TLL-PTM ECF No. 88, PageID.277 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 2
II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the FEDERAL RULES OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and

Recommendation within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins.

Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984

(6th Cir. 2005). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and

Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security, 474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir.

2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of

any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: August 25, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on Janet Parker and Robert Betts, served on the Probation Department

by other electronic means, and served on District Judge Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: August 25, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

Case 1:09-cr-20023-TLL-PTM ECF No. 88, PageID.278 Filed 08/25/09 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-20674

ANTHONY A. JAMES,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT OMISSIONS AND

MOTION FOR DESCRIPTIVE LISTINGS OF EXHIBITS AND STIPULATIONS

Before the court are two motions filed by Defendant Anthony A. James: a “Motion

to Correct Omissions from the Record,” and a “Motion for Descriptive Listing of Exhibits

and Stipulations on the Record.” No response is necessary to the motions, and the

court will deny them both. 

In the first motion, Defendant asserts that a portion of the official transcript is

missing, and he requests that the court order that the transcript be “corrected” to reflect

“the full dialogue of comments pertaining to the discussion of a letter.” (Dkt. # 74.) The

court has reviewed the transcript and finds that there is no indication that portions of the

record are missing. The court has also consulted with the court reporter, who has

indicated that the transcript, as filed, is complete and correct. Having no basis to

suggest that the official court record is in error, the court will deny the motion. 

In the second motion, Defendant asks for “a descriptive listing of exhibits and

stipulations that are a part of the record.” (Dkt. # 75.) The court has reviewed the

docket, and no such exhibit list or stipulation list was filed. Nor does the court retain the
C:\Documents and Settings\wagner\Local Settings\Temp\notes6030C8\08-20674.JAMES.Deny.Transcript.ExhibitList.wpd

2

exhibits at the end of a trial; they are instead typically retained by counsel of record. 

There is therefore no basis on which to provide Defendant the relief he seeks. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s “Motion to Correct Omissions from the Record”

[Dkt. # 74] and “Motion for Descriptive Listing of Exhibits and Stipulations on the

Record” [Dkt. # 75] are DENIED.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 3, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, February 3, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522