alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Myriad Entertainment & Resorts,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Scott Hawrelechko, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods
                  presented in the Report.

/S/ SCOTT HAWRELECHKO
---------------------------------------------------
Scott Hawrelechko
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

October 31, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Myriad Entertainment & Resorts, Inc. and will be retained by Myriad
Entertainment & Resorts, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3594 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3594

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure compliance with 
    veterans' preference requirements at the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 1996

  Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Filner, and Mr. Solomon) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure compliance with 
    veterans' preference requirements at the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH VETERANS' PREFERENCE REQUIREMENTS TO 
              BE TREATED AS A PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICE.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 713. Failure to comply with veterans' preference requirements to 
              be treated as a prohibited personnel practice
    ``(a) An employee of the Department who has authority to take, 
direct others to take, recommend, or approve any personnel action, 
shall not, with respect to such authority, take or fail to take any 
personnel action with respect to an employee or applicant for 
employment if the taking of or failure to take such action would 
violate any law, rule, or regulation implementing, or directly 
concerning, veterans' preference.
    ``(b) A failure to comply with subsection (a) shall be treated as a 
prohibited personnel practice.
    ``(c) The Secretary shall, not later than six months after the date 
of the enactment of this section, submit a written report to each House 
of Congress with respect to--
            ``(1) the implementation of this section; and
            ``(2) the administration of veterans' preference 
        requirements by the Department generally.
    ``(d) For the purpose of this section, the terms `personnel action' 
and `prohibited personnel practice' shall have the respective meanings 
given them by section 2302 of title 5.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 7 of such title is amended by inserting after the item relating 
to section 712 the following:

``Sec. 713. Failure to comply with veterans' preference requirements to 
                            be treated as a prohibited personnel 
                            practice.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Virgil NULL, Defendant/Appellant. Virgil NULL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 64897, 66838.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 10, 1995.

Raymond J. Capelovitch, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and WHITE, J.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on his conviction by a jury for unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(3), RSMo 1986. He also appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his claim for Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sally Holdings LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark J. Flaherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                  |                                                   |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | By:                                                    | /s/ Mark J. Flaherty |
|                  | Mark J. Flaherty                                       |
|                  | Senior Vice President   and Chief Financial Officer of |
|                  | Sally Holdings LLC                                     |
| February 3, 2011 |                                                   |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 22, 2009 

0415 

Order 

 

April 22, 2009 

137999 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137999 

 COA: 288477 

Oakland CC: 2007-213173-FH 

LARRY J. McCALL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as 

on leave granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

feder law office, p.a.

2930 e. camelback road, suite 160

phoenix, arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135

bf@federlawpa.com

fl@federlawpa.com

Bruce Feder - State Bar No. 004832

Attorney for Defendant, Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

Scott Spear. )

)

Defendant. )

)

)

)

NO. CR18-00422 PHX SPL

DEFENDANT SCOTT SPEAR’S

JOINDER IN DEFENDANTS LACEY’S

AND LARKIN’S OPPOSITION TO

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR

CLARIFICATION RE ORDER ON

ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

ISSUES

The Defendant, Scott Spear, by and through his attorney, Bruce Feder/Feder Law Office.,

P.A., hereby joins in Defendants Lacey’s and Larkin’s Opposition to Government’s Motion for

Clarification re Order on Attorney-Client Privilege Issues [409] in all respects as said Opposition

applies to him.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 11th day of December, 2018.

FEDER LAW OFFICE, P.A.

/s/ Bruce Feder

Attorney for Defendant, Scott Spear

. . .

. . .

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 414 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 11th day of December, 2018, I electronically transmitted the

foregoing to the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice

of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Kevin Rapp: Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov

John Kucera: John.Kucera@usdoj.gov

Reginald Jones: Reginald.Jones@usdoj.gov

Peter S. Kozinets: Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States

Paul Cambria: pcambira@lglaw.com

James Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

Erin McCampbell: emccampbell@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Rever: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Ronald London: ronnielondon@dwt.com

Janey Henze Cook: janey@henzecookemurphy.com

John Littrell: jlittrell@bmkattorneys.com

Kenneth Miller: kmiller@bmkattorneys.com

Michael Piccarreta: mlp@pd-law.com

Stephen M. Weiss: sweiss@karpweiss.com

Michael Kimerer: mdk@kimerer.com

Tom Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Gary Lincenberg: gsl@birdmarella.com

Ariel Neuman: aneuman@birdmarella.com

KC Maxwell: kcm@kcmaxlaw.com

David Wakukawa: dsw@kcmaxlaw.com

Attorneys for the Defense

By: /s/ A. Jones

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 414 Filed 12/11/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15815]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. EL95-56-000]


Michigan Statewide Programmatic Agreement; Notice of Meeting

June 17, 1996.
    a. Date and Time of Meeting: July 23, 1996, 10:00 am.
    b. Place: Michigan Library and Historical Center, The Forum, Ground 
Floor, 717 West Allegan Street, Lansing, MI 48918-1800.
    c. FERC Contact: James T. Griffin (202) 219-2799; Mike Dees (202) 
219-2807.
    d. SHPO Contact: Kristine Wilson (517) 335-2721.
    e. Purpose of the Meeting: The Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the 
Michigan State Historic Preservation Officer intend to execute a 
Statewide Programmatic Agreement for the management of properties 
listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic 
Places that may be affected by issuing new and amended licenses to 
licensed, existing hydroelectric projects in the State of Michigan. A 
draft Programmatic Agreement has been developed by these three parties 
and provided to other interested parties for their comment. At this 
meeting, participants will be afforded the opportunity to pose queries 
and present comments, concerns, and observations about the draft 
Programmatic Agreement prior to its being finalized for execution.
    f. Proposed Agenda: (1) Discussion of the draft Programmatic 
Agreement.
    g. The parties included on the list attached to this notice, and 
all other interested parties, are hereby invited to attend this meeting 
as participants. Questions should be directed to Messrs. Griffin and 
Lee or to Ms. Wilson at the numbers listed above.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15815 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BAE Industries, Incorporated,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:08−cv−14497−AC−DAS

Hon. Avern Cohn

Whitesell Corporation, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE TO APPEAR

 You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable Avern Cohn, Theodore Levin U.S.

Courthouse, 231 West Lafayette Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan, for the following proceeding(s):

• STATUS CONFERENCE: October 30, 2008 at 11:00 AM

Certification

 I hereby certify that on this date a copy of the foregoing notice was served upon the parties

and/or counsel of record by electronic means or first class U.S. mail.

By: s/ J. Owens 

Case Manager

Dated: October 27, 2008

2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 13 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 372
Fialka

Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 58

Dockets.Justia.com
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12


                           Randalls Food Markets, Inc.
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Dollars in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                             Fiscal Years
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     1998          1997          1996         1995          1994
                                                     ----          ----          ----         ----          ----
<S>                                                 <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>
Earnings
Income (loss) before income taxes and
     extraordinary loss                             $   38,466    $ (55,932)    $  35,754    $   7,057     $      163
Fixed Charges                                           49,948       52,999        53,551       55,791         59,935
                                                    ------------------------    ----------   ----------    ----------
Earnings (loss) before income taxes,
          extraordinary loss and fixed charges      $   88,414    $  (2,933)    $  89,305    $  62,848     $   60,098
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------

Fixed Charges
Interest expense                                    $   32,949    $  36,828     $  38,981    $  43,411     $   50,442
One-third rental expense                                16,999       16,171        14,570       12,380          9,493
                                                    -----------   ----------    ----------   ----------    ----------
Total Fixed charges                                 $   49,948    $  52,999     $  53,551    $  55,791     $   59,935
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------
Earnings to fixed charges ratio:                        1.77x            -         1.67x        1.13x           1.00x
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------
Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges               -     $ (55,932)           -            -              -
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------
                                                    ----------    ---------     ---------    ---------     ----------


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                           STATE OF ORGANIZATION                NAMES USED TO TRANSACT BUSINESS
------------------                           ---------------------                -------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                                  <C>
Buford Bros., Inc.                           Tennessee                            Industrial Distribution Group

Cardinal Machinery, Inc.                     Tennessee                            Industrial Distribution Group

E.C. Blackstone Company                      Georgia                              Industrial Distribution Group

IDG USA, LLC                                 Georgia                              Boring-Smith
                                                                                  Dixie Industrial
                                                                                  Industrial Distribution Group
                                                                                  Industrial Distribution Group --
                                                                                    New England
                                                                                  R.F. Ker Co.

IDG-Mexico, Inc.                             Georgia                              None

The New England Group Industrial
 Distributors, Inc.                          New Hampshire                        Industrial Distribution Group
                                                                                  IDG -- New England
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23


                 CONSENT OF THE DANIEL PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC.

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


 To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
 Diversified Senior Services, Inc.

     We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB our report dated
February 24, 1998 on the consolidated financial statements of Diversified Senior
Services, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then
ended, and as of December 31, 1996 and for the period from May 17, 1996 to
December 31, 1996.


/s/ THE DANIEL PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC.
THE DANIEL PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC.
Winston-Salem, NC
March 27, 1997
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ispat International N.V.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr Bhikam C. Agarwal, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/      Lakshmi N. Mittal
------------------------------------
Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal
Chairman of Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Ispat
International N.V.
April 9, 2004





/s/      Bhikam C. Agarwal
-----------------------------------
Mr. Bhikam C. Agarwal
Chief Financial Officer of Ispat International N.V.
April 9, 2004





     This certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and accompanies
the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ispat International N.V.
and will be retained by Ispat International N.V. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2016

No. 04-16-00039-CV

MOMENTUM CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Keith DILL, D&K Energy Services, LLC and DK Manufacturing, LLC,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-18711

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction. 

Appellees’ brief was due April 20, 2016. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time 

was filed.

We therefore ORDER appellees to file their appellees’ brief and a written response 

reasonably explaining their failure to timely file the brief in this court on or before May 6, 2016. 

If appellees fail to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will order the case 

submitted without an appellees’ brief. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jonathan CULLEN, Appellant, Jonathan CULLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 47143, WD 49344.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dec. 13, 1994.

Patricia A Richter, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., and Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*821
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Consolidated appeal from conviction of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4), RSMo 1986 (repealed), and sentence of five years’ imprisonment, and from denial of Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing.

The conviction is affirmed, and the denial of post-conviction motion is affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).