alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1689]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-144-000]


Williams Natural Gas Co.; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

January 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 18, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed in Docket No. CP96-
144-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
157.216) for authorization to abandon measurement and appurtenant 
facilities at 11 locations in Nowata and Washington Counties, Oklahoma 
and Chautauqua, Labette, and Montgomery Counties, Kansas under WNG's 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-479-000 pursuant to 
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the 
request that is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    WNG proposes to abandon the transportation of natural gas and to 
reclaim facilities originally installed for delivery of sales gas at 
four locations: J&S Feed, Seed & Supply in Washington County, Oklahoma, 
Clarence Graybill in Labette County, Kansas, Union Gas Elk City town 
border in Montgomery County, Kansas, and the KC Crude setting in 
Montgomery County, Kansas. WNG also proposes to abandon by reclaim 
facilities originally installed to receive transportation gas at seven 
locations: Bayou PLD in Nowata County, Oklahoma, the MDA PLD and Petro 
D-3 in Montgomery County, Kansas, the Central Plains PLD and Highwood 
PLD in Labette County, Kansas, and the Flamco Energy PLD and SE Kansas 
Gas #2 in Chautauqua County, Kansas. WNG states that the affected 
customers have agreed to the reclaim of the facilities or the companies 
no longer exist. WNG estimates that the total reclaim costs are $16,056 
with a salvage value of $0.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1689 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jane A. Freeman, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Scientific Learning Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 9, 2005
/s/ Jane A. Freeman
Jane A. Freeman
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q(the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 ofManhattan Bancorp (the “Company”).

 

I, Harry W. Chenoweth, Interim President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                           The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                           The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods presented in the financial statements included in suchreports.

 

 
| Dated:  November 12, 2010 |                                           |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                                           |
|                           |                                           |
|                           | /s/  Harry W. Chenoweth                        |
|                           | Harry  W. Chenoweth                            |
|                           | Interim  President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Reportfairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions andresults of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2009, and for theperiod then ended.

 

 
| /s/ GLADE  M. KNIGHT   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| **Glade M. Knight**         |   |
| **Chief Executive Officer** |   |
|                        |   |
| November 4, 2009       |   |
|                        |   |
| /s/ BRYAN  PEERY       |   |
| **Bryan Peery**             |   |
| **Chief Financial Officer** |   |
|                        |   |
| November 4, 2009       |   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Corporation.



/s/ Gregory S. WeisharGregory S. WeisharChief Executive Officer and DirectorMay 8, 2008
EXHIBIT 23.2



CONSENT OF MORRISON, BROWN, ARGIZ & FARRA, LLP



We consent to the incorporation by reference on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-109363 and 333-130363 and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-128814, 333-132897 and 333-140384) of our report dated February 26, 2007 with respect to the financial statements of Beach Bank at December 28, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and for the period ended December 28, 2006 and the year ended December 31, 2005 appearing in the 2006 Form 10-K of Sun American Bancorp.



/s/ MORRISON, BROWN, ARGIZ& FARRA, LLP



Miami, Florida

March 27, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JANINE WEATHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-CV-15267-DT

SHERIFF WARREN EVANS, ET.AL.,

Defendant(s).

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

 RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1(b)(2). The magistrate judge

issued her report on August 18, 2009, recommending that this court dismiss the case

without prejudice for lack of prosecution. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived. In addition, the failure to

object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to review

independently the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report

and Recommendation, this matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:08-cv-15267-RHC-VMM Doc # 27 Filed 09/08/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 94
2

Dated: September 8, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, September 8, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:08-cv-15267-RHC-VMM Doc # 27 Filed 09/08/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 95
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30857-30858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15434]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30858]]


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Business Development Center Applications: Chicago

AGENCY: Minority Business Development Agency.

ACTION: Cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) is cancelling 
the announcement to solicit competitive applications under its Minority 
Business Development Center (MBDC) Program to operate the Chicago, 
Illinois MBDC. This solicitation was originally published in the 
Federal Register, Wednesday, June 12, 1996, Vol. 61, No. 114, page 
29735.

11.800  Minority Business Development Center

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)

    Dated: June 13, 1996.
Donald L. Powers,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Minority Business Development Agency.
[FR Doc. 96-15434 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-21-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3634 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3634

 To amend provisions of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands 
 which relate to the temporary absence of executive officials and the 
        priority payment of certain bonds and other obligations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1996

 Mr. Frazer (for himself, Mr. Baldacci, Mr. Bishop, Mr. Thompson, Ms. 
  Norton, Mr. Moran, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mrs. Meek of 
 Florida, Mr. Luther, Mr. Romero-Barcelo, Mr. Hilliard, Ms. McKinney, 
  Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Rangel, Mr. Dornan, Ms. Jackson-Lee, Mr. Lewis of 
  Georgia, Mr. Flake, Mr. Hayworth, and Mr. Menendez) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend provisions of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands 
 which relate to the temporary absence of executive officials and the 
        priority payment of certain bonds and other obligations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Virgin Islands Organic Revision Act 
of 1996''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY ABSENCE OF OFFICIALS CLARIFIED.

    Section 14 of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands (48 
U.S.C. 1595) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(g) An absence from the Virgin Islands of the Governor or the 
Lieutenant Governor, while on official business shall not be a 
`temporary absence' for purposes of this section.''.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO PRIORITY OF BONDS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS.

    (a) Authority To Issue Obligations.--Section 3 of the Act entitled 
``An Act to authorize the government of the Virgin Islands to issue 
bonds in anticipation of revenue receipts and to authorize the 
guarantee of such bonds by the United States under specified 
conditions, and for other purposes'', approved August 19, 1976 (48 
U.S.C. 1574c), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``priority for payment'' and inserting in 
        lieu thereof ``a parity lien with every other issue of bonds or 
        other obligations issued for payment''; and
            (2) by striking ``in the order of the date of issue''.
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
to obligations issued on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,763,628
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,771,380
<PP&E>                                         1,262,106
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,033,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          47,455
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32,115
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,953,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   40,333,486
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               798,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (157,538)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (641,130)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (641,130)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (641,130)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.02)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 34407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No.96-136; RM-8816]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mililani Town, HI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by James Boersema seeking the allotment of UHF television Channel 
60 to Mililani Town, Hawaii, as that locality's first local television 
service. Coordinates for this proposal are 21-27-29 North Latitude and 
158-01-04 West Longitude. Although the Commission has imposed a freeze 
on TV allotments in certain metropolitan areas pending the outcome of 
an inquiry into the uses of advanced television systems (ATV) in 
broadcasting, this proposal is not affected thereby.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 12, 1996, and reply 
comments on or before August 27, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner, as follows: James Boersema, 733 Bishop 
Street, #170-460, Honolulu, HI 96813.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-136, adopted June 14, 
1996, and released June 21, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-16764 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3611 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3611

   To extend the authority for the Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
  Projects for fiscal years 1997 through 1999, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 1996

  Mr. Buyer (for himself, Mr. Filner, Mr. Stump, and Mr. Montgomery) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
  Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Banking and 
 Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the authority for the Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
  Projects for fiscal years 1997 through 1999, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 738(e)(1) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance 
Act (42 U.S.C. 11448(e)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(E) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.
            ``(F) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998.
            ``(G) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999.''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Paragraph (2) of section 102(d) of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority of the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out certain programs and 
activities, to require certain reports from the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs, and for other purposes'', approved February 13, 1996 (Public 
Law 104-110; 110 Stat. 769), is repealed, and the provisions of section 
741 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
11450) are amended so as to appear as in effect immediately before the 
enactment of Public Law 104-110.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Wilson S. CAMDEN, Appellant.

No. 62297.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 16, 1993.

Raymond L. Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance for which he was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to a term of eight years. In his appeal, Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in refusing his tendered instruction on presence at or near the scene and in denying his motion in limine and overruling his objections to evidence of a co-defendant’s possession of marijuana. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no jurisprudential purpose. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).