alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. June 19, 1996.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
subdivisional lines and subdivision of section 18, and the further 
subdivision of section 18, and a metes-and-bounds survey within section 
18, T. 6 N., R. 34 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group No. 914, was 
accepted, June 19, 1996.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the survey of 
the above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, 
Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 3380 Americana Terrace, 
Boise, Idaho, 83706-2500.

    Dated: June 19, 1996.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 96-16444 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2011 (the Report), I, Richard J.
Freer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                            
|-------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
|April 15, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard J. Freer, Ph.D.
|               |  |  |  | Richard J. Freer, Ph.D     
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery
E. Jones,  Secretary/Treasurer  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2009



                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                Secretary/Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-20599-BC

 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

STEVEN PAUL WALTON,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT ONE OF THE INDICTMENT, AND

TAKING THE RULE 11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on March 8, 2010, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on March 9,

2010, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one of the

indictment. As of today’s date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. The election to not file objections to the magistrate judge’s report releases the

Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt.

# 36] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one of the indictment

is ACCEPTED, and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 34] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: April 2, 2010
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on April 2, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
Exhibit

10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. .
20.

21.

INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Description

Deposition of Robert Wiggins

March 19, 2007 Proposal

Deposition of Janice Fialka

Deposition of Lionel Maten

IPEDS Report

Deposition of Mary Beth Snyder

Affidavit of Roxanne Fisher

Email from Feldman to Fisher

Letter from Maten to Plaintiff

Affidavit of Lionel Maten

Contract for Residence Hall Services 2008-09
Contract for Residence Hall Services 2007-08
Affidavit of Linda Sisson

2009-10 NCES Survey Material: FAQ
FISAP Report

FISAP Instructions

Sutton v. Piper, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17201 (6" Cir. July 30, 2009)
Stewart v. Barnhart, 2005 WL 3088543 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 14, 2005)
Affidavit of Mary Beth Snyder

Provost Memos

IPEDS Glossary Excerpt
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00725-CV

IN RE Rodney CABRERA

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 30, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled 

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-01925, styled In the Interest of C.L.C., et al., in the 150th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding. However, the rulings 

complained of were made by the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, presiding judge of the 45th Judicial District 

Court, Bexar County, Texas.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 21

- 13785 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus KIMANI AMON JONES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:20

- cr
- 00228

- RAH

- SRW

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-13785 Date Filed: 05/23/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 21

- 13785

Before LAGOA, BRASHER, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The g overnment’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Jones ’s plea agreement is GRANTED

. See United States v. Bushert , 997 F.2d 1343, 1350

- 51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced i f it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard

- Henry , 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiverof the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error). USCA11 Case: 21-13785 Date Filed: 05/23/2022 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35198-35199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17073]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP93-198-005]


Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company; Notice of Refund Report

June 28, 1996.
    Take notice that Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company (Alabama-
Tennessee) on June 5, 1996, tendered for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission (Commission) its Refund Report summarizing a 
flow-through refund from Tennessee Gas Pipeline (Tennessee) dated May 
13, 1996. The refund is being flowed through pursuant to Section 
33.4(f) of the General Terms and Conditions of Alabama-Tennessee's FERC 
Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1.
    Alabama-Tennessee states that the refund relates to certain 
stranded upstream capacity Alabama-Tennessee had on Tennessee after 
implementation of FERC Order 636, the costs of which were collected 
from the customers shown on the Appendix B to the filing.
    Alabama-Tennessee states that it is making this refund by way of a 
credit to the affected customers' May, 1996 invoices which will be 
submitted on or about June 10, 1996. Alabama-Tennessee is flowing 
through the entire amount received from Tennessee. A summary sheet 
setting forth the refund calculation is enclosed in Appendix A to the 
filing. Alabama-Tennessee requests that any necessary waiver be 
granted.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
should be file don or before July 8, 1996. Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are

[[Page 35199]]

on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-17073 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6970

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus CRISHONE CRYSTAL JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-96-30022) Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 21, 2005 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Crishone Crystal Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).1 Insofar as Johnson is appealing the February 14, 2005, order denying her motion to expedite review of a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, this court does not have jurisdiction because the May 25, 2005, notice of appeal is untimely as to that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B).
2 To the extent Johnson may be seeking authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000), citing Booker and Blakely , we deny authorization because the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review with respect to either case. - 2 - PER CURIAM: By notice of appeal dated May 25, 2005, Crishone Crystal Johnson seeks to appeal her sentence o rdered in a March 4, 1999, criminal judgment, citing United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. ____, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005) and Blakely v. Washington , 542 U.S. 296 (2004). In criminal cases, the defendant must file her notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). The time periods established by Rule 4 are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). Insofar as Johnson appeals the March 4, 1999, criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 1 2 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIKAH FIALKA-FELDMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD OF

TRUSTEES,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 08-14922

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

NOTICE

The following motion has been filed with the Court: 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

You are hereby notified that, having reviewed the briefs in support of this motion

and in opposition thereto, the Court sees no need for oral argument. Therefore, in

accordance with Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), the Court is dispensing with oral argument.

A written opinion will be issued.

_____________________________________________________________________

Certificate of Mailing

I certify that this notice was electronically filed and served on Chris E. Davis, Esq. and

Robert A. Boonin, Esq.

Date: April 15, 2009

s/ Marilyn Orem,

Deputy Clerk, (313) 234-5145
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 21, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41297

Summary Calendar

 

MICHAEL DEAN PERRY

Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

MAXI CIRLIANO, Sheriff, Gregg County, LONGVIEW POLICE

DEPARTMENT, UNIDENTIFIED DENMON, Captain, Gregg County Jail,

GENE ANDERSON, Officer, Gregg County Jail, SHANNON STANDARD,

Officer, Gregg County Jail

Defendants - Appellees

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CV-482

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Dean Perry, Texas prisoner #1084501, appeals from

the denial of his postjudgment motion for a new trial, which was

properly construed as a motion for relief from judgment under

FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b). See Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat

Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 667 (5th Cir. 1986)(en banc). In

the instant appeal, Perry has filed motions seeking appointment
No. 02-41297

-2-

of counsel and production of a transcript at government expense. 

Those motions are DENIED.

In his FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion, Perry challenged the

dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit on the

grounds that: (1) he had not been admonished of his right to

appeal; (2) he was denied full disclosure of the evidence;

(3) his requests for appointment of counsel had been denied;

(4) he was denied access to adequate legal materials; and (5) the

jail personnel interfered with his right to access the courts. 

Perry’s lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice because he failed to

obey the magistrate judge’s order and answer questions posed to

him on cross-examination during the bench trial. As none of

Perry’s arguments in his FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion addressed

that sole basis for dismissal, the denial of that motion was

proper. See Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402

(5th Cir. 1981).

As Perry’s appeal lacks arguable merit, it is DISMISSED AS

FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as

frivolous counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th

Cir. 1996). If he accumulates three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g), Perry will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in

any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or
No. 02-41297

-3-

detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. Id.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING

ISSUED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.17
   th
  Company
 Severance Benefits
 Salary
 Bonus plus
 Medical Benefits
 Vesting Acceleration




---



##### 



Definition of Cause and Good Reason
 Severance Benefits on a Change of Control Sale of the Company Cause and
 Salary, Bonus and Medical Benefits
 Vesting Acceleration
 Transitional Services




---



##### 



Timing and Withholding
 Release
 Entire Agreement
 Sincerely,
INTERWOVEN, INC./s/ Joseph L. CowanBy:  Joseph L. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer Acknowledged and Agreed:/s/ John E. CalonicoJohn E. Calonico, Jr.




---



##### 



ADDENDUM A
 GENERAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF CLAIMS
  Release and Waiver of Claims
   A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does
not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing
the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his
settlement with the debtor.
  1




---



##### 



Covenant Not to Sue
       2




---



##### 



EMPLOYEES ACCEPTANCE OF RELEASE
  Signature:Printed Name:Date:
 3




---



##### 



ADDENDUM TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 
 W I T N E S S E T H
      and provided that
 1




---



##### 



11. Entire Agreement .
 [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SavWatt USA, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Isaac H. Sutton,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 25, 2010                     /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 35731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17289]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1119-DR]


Alaska; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Alaska (FEMA-1119-DR), dated June 7, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 24, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective June 15, 1996.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-17289 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
Exhibit 32.02  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of POWRtec International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Len Wood, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Len Wood By: Len Wood Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 13, 2011    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2:08-cv-14344-PDB-MKM Doc # 209 Filed 06/08/12 Pg 1 of 4 Pg ID 3026
2:08-cv-14344-PDB-MKM Doc # 209 Filed 06/08/12 Pg 2 of 4 Pg ID 3027
2:08-cv-14344-PDB-MKM Doc # 209 Filed 06/08/12 Pg 3 of 4 Pg ID 3028
2:08-cv-14344-PDB-MKM Doc # 209 Filed 06/08/12 Pg 4 of 4 Pg ID 3029