alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15320]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket No. 48-96]


Foreign-Trade Zone No. 85, Everett, WA; Reissuance of Grant of 
Authority

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board (the Board) by the Puget Sound Foreign-Trade Zone Association, 
grantee of FTZ 85, Everett, Washington, requesting the reissuance of 
the grant of authority for FTZ 85 to the Port of Everett, a Washington 
public corporation, which has concurrently requested to become the new 
grantee of the zone project. The application was submitted pursuant to 
the provisions of the FTZ Act, as amended (U.S.C. 81a-81u) and the 
regulations of the Board (15 CFR Part 400). It was formally filed on 
May 31, 1996.
    Public comment (original and 3 copies) is invited from interested 
parties (see FTZ Board address below). The closing date for their 
receipt is July 17, 1996.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
at the following location: Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-
Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 3716, 14th & 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15320 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q(the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 ofManhattan Bancorp (the “Company”).

 

I, Dean Fletcher, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                             The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                             The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods presented in the financial statements included in suchreports.

 

 
| Dated:  November 12, 2010 |                          |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                           |                          |
|                           |                          |
|                           | /s/  Dean Fletcher            |
|                           | Dean  Fletcher                |
|                           | Executive  Vice President and |
|                           | Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          50,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,528
<PP&E>                                          32,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,112,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,439
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,907
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,084,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,112,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,004,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,977,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,977,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,977,161)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Greater Asia Realty Holdings, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tay Chong Weng, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


/s/ Tay Chong Weng
---------------------------------
By: Tay Chong Weng
Title: Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director

Dated: May 27, 2008




                                      17
Exhibit 10.17(b)







Exhibit 10.17(b)




Schedule identifying

Non-Employee Directors of Park National Corporation

covered by

Split-Dollar Agreements, made and entered into effective as of December 28, 2007




     The following directors of Park National Corporation (“Park”) are covered by Split-Dollar
Agreements (the “New Split-Dollar Agreements”) as identified below, which Split-Dollar Agreements
are identical to the form of Split-Dollar Agreement, made and entered into effective as of December
28, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Park’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 2, 2008 (File
No. 1-13006):



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Subsidiary of Park which is a Party to	 	Date of New Split-
	Name of Director	 	New Split-Dollar Agreement	 	Dollar Agreement
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Maureen H. Buchwald

	 	The Park National Bank
(as successor by merger
to The First-Knox
National Bank of Mount
Vernon)
	 	December 28, 2007
	 
	 	 	 	 
	James J. Cullers

	 	The Park National Bank
(as successor by merger
to The First-Knox
National Bank of Mount
Vernon)
	 	December 28, 2007
	 
	 	 	 	 
	F. William
Englefield IV

	 	The Park National Bank
	 	December 28, 2007
	 
	 	 	 	 
	John J. O’Neill

	 	The Park National Bank
	 	December 28, 2007
	 
	 	 	 	 
	J. Gilbert Reese

	 	The Park National Bank
	 	December 28, 2007
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Rick R. Taylor

	 	The Park National Bank
(as successor by merger
to The Richland Trust
Company)
	 	December 28, 2007
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Leon Zazworsky

	 	The Park National Bank
	 	December 28, 2007
ex10149.htm


    
      

      

    


    Amended
and Restated Air Transportation Plan

    for Non-Employee Directors
of AMR Corporation

    


    


    Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code applies to the complimentary air
transportation provided to the non-employee Directors of AMR Corporation
(“AMR”).  In order to avoid imposition of certain income taxes,
penalty taxes and interest, the air transportation plan for non-employee
Directors of AMR is hereby amended and restated as provided below, effective as
of January 1, 2005.

    


    Each
current or former non-employee Director of AMR and his or her spouse or
companion and dependent children (under the age of twenty-three (23)) are
entitled to unlimited complimentary air transportation in any available class of
service on American Airlines and American Eagle (“American”) and free Admirals
Club memberships.

     

    If the
Director served on the AMR Board of Directors (the “Board”) for at least ten
(10) years and retired from the Board on or after age seventy (70), American
will continue to provide complimentary air transportation for the individuals
described above following his or her service on the Board until the later of the
death of the Director and the Director’s spouse or companion.  If the
Director served on the Board for less than ten (10) years or retired from the
Board prior to age seventy (70), American will continue to provide complimentary
air transportation for the individuals described above for the number of years
the Director served on the Board, commencing with the date on which the Director
no longer is a member of the Board.

     

    American
will be responsible for any taxes on such air transportation and will reimburse
each Director for any taxes paid for this transportation.  Tax
reimbursements will be made not later than the last day of the taxable year
following the year in which the Director paid these taxes, and such
reimbursement cannot be further deferred.  Such air transportation and
tax reimbursements cannot be exchanged for any other benefit or liquidated for
other compensation, and the amount of air transportation used in a particular
year will not otherwise affect the air transportation the Director may use in
any other year.

     

    The Board
may amend or terminate this plan at any time.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 08-20599

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

STEVEN PAUL WALTON,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

This case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§

636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties, Defendant’s offer

of a plea of guilty. Defendant and his counsel appeared before me on March 8, 2010. In open

court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s consent, and then advised and

questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense to which Defendant pleaded guilty is supported by an independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements of the offense. Therefore, I have ordered the preparation

of a presentence investigation report.
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant’s plea be accepted, Defendant be adjudged guilty and the Court impose

sentence.

III. REVIEW

Pursuant to Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[w]ithin 14 days after

being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific

written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another

party’s objections within 14 days after being served with a copy.” FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2). See

also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further

right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Howard

v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638

F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and Recommendation.

Willis v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 931 F.2d 390, 401 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit

Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR

72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: March 9, 2010 United States Magistrate Judge
3

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on George Bush and Shane Waller, and served on U.S. District Judge

Thomas Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: March 9, 2010 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CA-930-06-2700 WARD]


Extension of Scoping Period for Ward Valley Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) Until July 15, 1996

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in California announces an 
extension of the scoping period for the Ward Valley SEIS until July 15, 
1996. Three public scoping workshops were held in Sacramento, San 
Bernardino and Needles, California. This extension is to allow the 
public more time to provide written comments on the scope of the SEIS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard F. Johnson or John S. Miles at (916) 979-2800.
Philip L. Damon,
Acting Area manager.
[FR Doc. 96-17122 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER

GRANTING ACLU OF 

ARIZONA’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF 

REGARDING FIRST 

AMENDMENT 

CONSIDERATIONS

Having reviewed the ACLU of Arizona’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File 

Amicus Curiae Brief Regarding First Amendment Considerations, and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the ACLU of Arizona’s Amicus Curiae Brief 

Regarding First Amendment Considerations, which was lodged with the Motion for Leave, 

shall be deemed properly filed. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 620-2 Filed 05/28/19 Page 1 of 1
#### Browning *v.*The State of Ohio.

(No. 23156

Decided October 28, 1931.)

*Mr. Edward J. Corcoran,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Robert N. Gorman,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Jolm H. Clippinger,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Bay, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
Opinion filed May 16, 2013

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-12-00364-CR

__________

ENRIQUE ROBERTO VILLARREAL 

A/K/A HENRY VILLARREAL

A/K/A HENRY ROBERT VILLARREAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 350th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 8858-D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Enrique Roberto Villarreal a/k/a Henry Villarreal a/k/a Henry Robert 

Villarreal has filed in this court a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal and 

dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2, the motion is signed by both 

appellant and his counsel.
2

The motion is granted. Appellant’s notice of appeal is withdrawn, and the 

appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

May 16, 2013

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3667 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3667

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude tips from gross 
                                income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 1996

  Mr. Crane introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude tips from gross 
                                income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF TIPS FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by redesignating section 137 as section 
138 and by inserting after section 136 the following new section:

``SEC. 137. TIPS.

    ``(a) In General.--Gross income shall not include tips.
    ``(b) Regulations Prescribed by the Secretary.--The Secretary shall 
prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to carry out the 
purposes of this section.''
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--The Secretary of the 
Treasury shall, within 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, submit to the Committee on Ways and Means recommendations for 
technical and conforming amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 which the Secretary of the Treasury considers appropriate as a 
result of the amendments made by subsection (a).
    (c) Clerical Amendments.--The table of sections for part III of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by striking out the 
item relating to section 137 and by inserting in lieu thereof the 
following:

                              ``Sec. 137. Tips.
                              ``Sec. 138. Cross references to other 
                                        Acts.''

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to tips received after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10259

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MORRIS EDWARD MOORE, also

known as Sealed Defendant 2,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CR-42-2

June 1, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Morris Edward Moore appeals from his convictions for conspiracy and narcotics offenses.

He arguesthat the evidence wasinsufficient to support his convictions. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Civil No. 09-10324

Plaintiff,

vs. Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

ASSORTED JEWELRY VALUED

AT APPROXIMATELY $21,975.00

IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST ALL INTERESTED PARTIES 

AND FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default

Judgment Against All Interested Parties and Final Order of Forfeiture, and the Court being fully

advised in the premises, it is:

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default

Judgment is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the defendant jewelry

valued at approximately $21,975.00, is hereby FORFEITED to the United States of America

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(A) and (C).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the right, title and

ownership interest of Ola Robertson, or her successors and assignees, in such jewelry, and any

right, title and interest of all other persons, is hereby and forever EXTINGUISHED and that

2:09-cv-10324-PJD-DAS Doc # 15 Filed 08/04/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 37
clear title to such jewelry is hereby VESTED in the United States of America. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the United States

Marshal’s Service for the Eastern District of Michigan, or his delegate, be and is hereby

AUTHORIZED to dispose of such jewelry according to law. 

S/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: August 4, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

August 4, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

2

2:09-cv-10324-PJD-DAS Doc # 15 Filed 08/04/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 38
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corillian Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-K"), I, Alex P. Hart, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 24, 2004


/s/ ALEX P. HART


Alex P. Hart
Chief Executive Officer and President