alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-20517-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

D-4 FERNANDO RUELAS-TAPIA,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT ONE, AND TAKING THE RULE 11

PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on April 21, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on April 22,

2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty. As of today’s date, no

party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The failure to

file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit

Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object

to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 95] is ADOPTED.

1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB Doc # 105 Filed 05/12/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 305
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilt as to count one is ACCEPTED,

and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 89] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 12, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 12, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB Doc # 105 Filed 05/12/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 306
Case 1:08-cv-15080-TLL-CEB ECF No. 12 filed 11/12/09 PageID.110 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6957

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICKY MILTON GOSSERT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:17-cr-00112-RGD-DEM-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2021 Decided: October 19, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Milton Gossert, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Ricky Milton Gossert appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step 

Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. Having reviewed the 

record and finding no reversible error, we affirm the decision of the district court. See

United States v. Gossert, No. 2:17-cr-00112-RGD-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. June 2, 2021). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
Case 2:09-mc-50026-GER Document 1 Filed 01/14/2009 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32855]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16142]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ID-957-1420-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plats of the following described land were officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9 a.m. June 12, 1996.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
west boundary and subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of section 
30, T. 36 N., R. 1 W., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group No. 917, was 
accepted, June 12, 1996.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines, T. 31 N., R. 4 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group 
No. 935, was accepted June 12, 1996.
    These surveys were executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Nez Perce Tribe, at Lapwai, Idaho.
    All inquiries concerning the survey of the above described land 
must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, Idaho State Office, Bureau 
of Land Management, 3380 Americana Terrace, Boise, Idaho, 83706-2500.

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 96-16142 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
Exhibit 4 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1966-3 Filed 11/13/23 Page 1 of 2
From: qthai1019@gmail.com

To: Boyle, Daniel (USACAC)

Cc: Stone, Andrew (USAAZ); "Versoza, Lyndon A"

Subject: [EXTERNAL] 2018-07-20 TRACING FOR ALL ASSETS QT__LV Edits 5

Date: Wednesday, October 18, 2023 1:45:20 PM

Attachments: 2018-07-20 TRACING FOR ALL ASSETS QT__LV Edits 5.docx

Hello Dan,

I finished my testimony yesterday and I’m trying to get back into the swing of things. But I wanted to

share with you the latest draft of the tracing document that Lyndon and I put together years ago. 

You might already have a copy of a prior draft. Here is the latest copy for your review.

I don’t know what to expect or what the timetable will be going forward but I’m generally free after

1 and could make exceptions most days after 9AM. Call me anytime though if it’s for a quick chat,

even at 6AM. (My trading isn’t as engaging as it was even 6 months ago. I just move around

covered calls and put credit spreads.) Just let me know. 

Q

602-625-3381

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1966-3 Filed 11/13/23 Page 2 of 2
#### Derl Ross SCHATZ, Petitioner/Respondent. v. Stacey SCHATZ, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 69557.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Joseph R. Aubuchon, Daniel E. Leslie, Union, for Respondent/Appellant.

Jonathan L. Downard, Hansen, Stierber-ger, Downard & Melenbrink, Union, for Petitioner/Respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from that portion of a dissolution decree awarding joint legal custody and physical custody of the couple’s children to father. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 09-20006-05

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

JOSEPH JONES,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On September 21, 2009, this case was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of the parties,

Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. Defendant, along with counsel, appeared before me on

September 21, 2009. In open court, I examined Defendant under oath, confirmed Defendant’s

consent, and then advised and questioned Defendant regarding each of the inquiries prescribed by

Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Based upon Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND: (1) that Defendant

is competent to tender a plea; (2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently made; and (3)

that the offense(s) to which Defendant pleaded guilty is(are) supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have ordered the

preparation of a presentence investigation report.

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 116, PageID.335 Filed 09/22/09 Page 1 of 2
2

II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that, subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure, Defendant be adjudged guilty and sentence be imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and Recommendation

within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure

to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins. Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596

(6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005). The parties are

advised that making some objections, but failing to raise others, will not preserve all the objections

a party may have to this Report and Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security,

474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir. 2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich.

LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of any objections is to be served upon this magistrate judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: September 22, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB ECF No. 116, PageID.336 Filed 09/22/09 Page 2 of 2
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00349

- CR

Patrick Washington

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 211th District Court

o f Denton County (F

- 2010

- 0503

- C )

July 25, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3


                       ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


      ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT made as of November 20, 2000, between
Westgate International, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted company ("ASSIGNOR") and
The Kingston Limited Partnership, a Bermuda limited partnership ("ASSIGNEE").

      WHEREAS, Assignor is as of the date hereof, a party to (i) a Common Stock
Investment Agreement dated as of October 6, 2000 between Juno Online Services,
Inc. (the "COMPANY") and the Assignor (the "INVESTMENT AGREEMENT"), and (ii) a
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of October 6, 2000 between the Company
and the Assignor (the "REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT");

      WHEREAS, pursuant to its rights under Section 10(h) of the Investment
Agreement and Section 8 of the Registration Rights Agreement, Assignor wishes to
assign all of its rights and obligations in and under the Investment Agreement
and the Registration Rights Agreement to Assignee, and Assignee wishes to accept
such assignment and assume all such obligations; and

      WHEREAS, Assignor and Assignee are entities that are under common control;

      NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

         1.  Assignor hereby transfers and assigns all of its rights,
obligations, protections, indemnities and interests in and under the Investment
Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement to Assignee effective
immediately.

         2.  Assignee hereby accepts such assignment, irrevocably assumes all
liabilities and obligations in respect thereof, and agrees to be bound by the
provisions of the Investment Agreement and the Registration Rights Agreement.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have each executed this Assignment and
Assumption Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                 WESTGATE INTERNATIONAL, L.P.
                                 By: Elliot International Capital Advisors
                                 Inc., as Attorney-in-Fact


                                 By: /s/ Paul E. Singer
                                    --------------------------------
                                    Name:  Paul E. Singer
                                    Title: President

<PAGE>

                                 THE KINGSTON LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                 By: Kingston Associates, Ltd., as General
                                     Partner


                                    By: /s/ Paul E. Singer
                                        ------------------------------
                                          Name:  Paul E. Singer
                                          Title: President


Acknowledged on this 27th day of November, 2000 by:


JUNO ONLINE SERVICES, INC.


By: /s/ Charles Ardai
   ----------------------------
   Name:   Charles E. Ardai
   Title:  President and CEO



                                       2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31511]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15674]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
July 2, 1996; July 9, 1996; July 16, 1996; July 23, 1996; and July 30, 
1996, at 10:00 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key 
Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: June 14, 1996.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-15674 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

DESIGNATION OF CHAIR AND VICECHAIR OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD 

OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 320

DISCIPLINARY BOARD APPOINTMENT 

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2024, John C. Rafferty, Jr., Esquire, is 

designated as Chair, and Gretchen A. Mundorff, Esquire, is designated as Vice-Chair, of 

the Disciplinary Board of Pennsylvania, commencing April 1, 2024.
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 158-7   Filed 06/21/13   Pg 1 of 4    Pg ID 3394

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 158-7   Filed 06/21/13   Pg 2 of 4    Pg ID 3395

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 158-7   Filed 06/21/13   Pg 3 of 4    Pg ID 3396

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM   Doc # 158-7   Filed 06/21/13   Pg 4 of 4    Pg ID 3397
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 11, 2017

No. 04-17-00812-CV

IN RE Robert MARTINEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On December 6, 2017, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered the petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The 

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on December 11, 2017.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016CI06633, styled Robert Martinez v. Emilia C. Martinez, 

pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Mery presiding.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES CRAIG CRISTINI,

 

Petitioner, Civil No. 01-CV- 74483-DT

HONORABLE DENISE PAGE HOOD

v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

JEFFREY WOODS,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

JUDGMENT

The above entitled matter having come before the Court on a Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus, Honorable Denise Page Hood, a United States District Court Judge,

presiding, and in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on

February 29, 2012.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall be granted leave to appeal In

Forma Pauperis.

Dated at Detroit, Michigan, this 29th, day of February, 2012.

DAVID J. WEAVER 

CLERK OF THE COURT

APPROVED:

BY: s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry

DEPUTY CLERK 

s/Denise Page Hood

HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:01-cv-74483-DPH Doc # 160 Filed 02/29/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 4761
01-74483 Cristini v. Woods

Judgment

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served James Cristini

244014, Kinross Correctional Facility, 16770 S. Watertower Drive, Kincheloe, MI 49788 and

upon counsel of record on February 29, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry 

Case Manager

2:01-cv-74483-DPH Doc # 160 Filed 02/29/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 4762
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALI SAREINI,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-13961-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

 v.

DAVE BURNETT, RADWAN MARDINI,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

This matter is before the Court on a report and recommendation [Dkt # 37] issued by

Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan on June 30, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends that the

Court deny without prejudice certain motions that had been pending at the time that Plaintiff filed

an amended complaint. The motions include Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment [Dkt.

# 5], Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 12], and Plaintiff’s motion for class

certification and motion to appoint counsel [Dkt. # 30]. As of today’s date, no party has filed any

objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The failure to file objections to the

report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers

Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate

judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

1:08-cv-13961-TLL-VMM Doc # 38 Filed 07/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 580
-2-

# 37] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment [Dkt. # 5],

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 12], and Plaintiff’s motion for class certification

and motion to appoint counsel [Dkt. # 30] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 30, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 30, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cv-13961-TLL-VMM Doc # 38 Filed 07/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 581
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CASE NO. 08-20669-04

Plaintiff,

vs. HON. ROBERT H. CLELAND

CARLOS SOLER-NORONA,

Defendant.

 /

DAVID R. CRIPPS (P34972)

Attorney for Defendant

431 Gratiot Avenue

Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 963-0210

_____________________________________/

ORDER ALLOWING DAVID CRIPPS INTO THE 

WAYNE COUNTY JAIL WITH LAPTOP COMPUTER

This matter having come before the Court pursuant to counsel’s request to enter into the

Wayne County Jail with a laptop computer to review discovery formatted on compact disks, the

Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that David R. Cripps be admitted to the Wayne

 County Jail, with a laptop computer in a conference room with an electrical outlet for the purpose

 of reviewing discovery with the defendant, Mr. Carlos Soler-Norona, inmate #0033232.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: November 17, 2009

2:08-cr-20669-RHC-MKM Doc # 124 Filed 11/17/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 355
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date,

November 17, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:08-cr-20669-RHC-MKM Doc # 124 Filed 11/17/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 356
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

________

MAXWELL | LAW PC

KC Maxwell (State Bar No. 214701)

 KCM@KCMaxlaw.com

David S. Wakukawa (State Bar No. 262546)

 DSW@KCMaxlaw.com

899 Ellis Street

San Francisco, California 94109

Telephone: (415) 494-8887

Facsimile: (415) 749-1694

Attorneys for Defendant DAN HYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

vs.

5. DAN HYER,

 (Counts 1-63),

Defendants.

Case No. CR-18-00422-05-PHX-SPL (BSB)

WAIVER OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

AT ARRAIGNMENT AND ENTRY OF 

“NOT GUILTY” PLEA

COURT’S ACCEPTANCE OF WAVIER

[RULE 10(b) Fed. R. Crim. P.]

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 241 Filed 07/31/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

___

The Defendant in the above case acknowledges and agrees to the following:

1. I have received a copy of the Superseding Indictment against me. My lawyer has 

discussed the charges with me and has answered all questions I have so far. I waive reading of the 

charges against me.

2. My true and correct name is as indicated on the Superseding Indictment.

3. I understand I have the right to personally appear in open court on these charges. 

By signing this waiver, I give up my right to personally appear in open court for an arraignment.

4. I am entering a ''Not Guilty'' plea with the filing of this Waiver. I will file a 

''Notice of Trial Acknowledgment" of the trial date within 15 days of the scheduled arraignment or 

by the deadline for the filing of pretrial motions, whichever is later.

DATE: July 30, 2018 

Defendant DAN HYER

I am the attorney for the above-named Defendant. I have reviewed the charges against my 

client and agree with the "Waiver of Appearance at Arraignment."

DATE: July 30, 2018

KC MAXWELL

Attorney for Defendant DAN HYER

The Court accepts “Waiver of Defendant’s Appearance at Arraignment” and enters a plea 

of “Not Guilty for the Defendant Dan Hyer.

DATE: 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 241 Filed 07/31/18 Page 2 of 2