alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15982]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 184; Minimum Performance and 
Installation Standards for Runway Guard Lights

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for a 
Special Committee 184 meeting to be held July 10, 1996, starting at 
9:30 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Administrative Announcements; 
(2) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (3) Review and Approval of Meeting 
Agenda; (4) Review and Approval of Minutes of the Previous Meeting; (5) 
Review Comments Received from Proposed Final Draft; (6) Complete 
Editorial and Comment Cleanup on Proposed Final Draft; (7) Other 
Business; (8) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 17, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-15982 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         503,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,504,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (238,056)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,098,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,068,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                 992,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,678,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,945,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,678,476
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,645,857
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,472,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,207,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             307,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,658,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,658,696
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,658,696
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William
    UusiheimalaAntti
      William Uusiheimala
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                May
      17, 2010
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Walter EDEN, Appellant. Walter EDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 60637, 63288.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Jan. 4, 1994.

John Klosterman, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Millie Aulbur, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER and AHRENS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Walter Eden, appeals from his convictions in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis on one count of first-degree murder, Sec. 565.020 RSMo. (1986), and one count of armed criminal action, Sec. 571.015 RSMo. (1986), and from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, we have furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and Rule 84.-16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

DATE: Weeks of July 1, 8, 15, and 22, 1996.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of July 1

Tuesday, July 2

10:00 a.m.
    Briefing on Alternatives for Regulating Fuel Cycle Facilities 
(Public Meeting)
    (Contact: Ted Sherr, 301-415-7218)

Wednesday, July 3

10:00 a.m.
    Briefing on BPR Project on Redesigned Material Licensing Process 
(Public Meeting)
    (Contact: Pat Rathbun, 301-415-7178)
11:30 a.m.
    Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Week of July 8--Tentative

Wednesday, July 10

11:30 a.m.
    Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Week of July 15--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of July 15.

Week of July 22--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the Week of July 22.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: By a vote of 3-0 on June 26, the Commission 
determined pursuant to U.S.C. 552b(e) and Sec. 9.107(a) of the 
Commission's rules that ``Affirmation of Innovative Weaponry, Inc.--
Request for a Hearing'' (Public Meeting) be held on June 26, and on 
less than one weeks' notice to the public.
    The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (Recording)--(301) 415-
1292.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Bill Hill (301 415-1661.

    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at:

http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm.

    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred 
subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to 
be added to it, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: 
Operations Branch, Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1963).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the 
internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving 
this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an 
electronic message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c2d202e0c223e2f622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04656866446a76672a636b72">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a6e617d4a647869246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97f3fce0d7f9e5f4b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 28, 1996.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-17011 Filed 6-28-96; 2:29 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16313]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-731 (Final)]


Bicycles From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record <SUP>1 developed in the subject 
investigation, the Commission determines,<SUP>2 pursuant to section 
735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that 
an industry in the United States is not materially injured or 
threatened with material injury, and the establishment of an industry 
in the United States is not materially retarded, by reason of imports 
from China of bicycles,<SUP>3 provided for in subheadings 8712.00.15, 
8712.00.25, 8712.00.35, 8712.00.44, and 8712.00.48 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States, that have been found by the 
Department of Commerce to be sold in the United States at less than 
fair value (LTFV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Bragg dissenting and Commissioner Newquist 
dissenting with respect to bicycles shipped to the mass merchandiser 
and ``other retailer'' channels.
    \3\ The scope of the investigation is defined in the Department 
of Commerce's Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value (61 F.R. 19026, April 30, 1996), as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this investigation effective November 9, 
1995, following a preliminary determination by the Department of 
Commerce that imports of bicycles from China were being sold at LTFV 
within the meaning of section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)). 
Notice of the institution of the Commission's investigation and of a 
public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting 
copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the 
Federal Register of December 20, 1995 (60 F.R. 65667). The hearing was 
held in Washington, DC, on April 24, 1996, and all persons who 
requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by 
counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on June 12, 1996. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 2968 (June 1996), 
entitled ``Bicycles from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-731 (Final).''

    Issued: June 18, 1996.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16313 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 3, 2018

t1218 

# Order

Clerk January 3, 2018

156203

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 156203

COA: 337887

Livingston CC: 16

- 023559

- FH

LISA MARIE FINLAYSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2017 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 45 Att. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1826-1 Filed 10/03/23 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-76006) pertaining to the CTI Industries Corporation 2001 Stock
Option Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-76008) pertaining
to the CTI Industries Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan and Registration
Statement (Form SB-2 No. 333-31969), of our report dated April 15, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report
of CTI Industries Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
---------------------------

Schaumburg, Illinois
April 14, 2004
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard Damon REDD, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 65289.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

March 28, 1995.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Beal, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*641
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of burglary in the second degree, § 569.170 RSMo 1994, and stealing, § 570.030 RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to serve concurrent terms of seven years imprisonment on each count.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 10
 JOINDER AGREEMENT




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLCBy:
    /s/ Janice FetschName:
    Janice FetschTitle:
    Authorized SignatoryCITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.By:
    /s/ Laurie A. HessleinName:
    Laurie A. HessleinTitle:
    Managing DirectorCITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLCBy:
    /s/ Jerry PascucciName:
    Jerry PascucciTitle:
    PresidentEACH OF THE FUNDS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A HERETOBy:
    Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, the generalpartner or trading manager of each FundBy:
    /s/ Jerry PascucciName:
    Jerry PascucciTitle:
    President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report filed on Form 10-Q of Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. William Pim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ J. William PimJ. William Pim, Chief Financial OfficerDated: May 16, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY LAMAR PRICE-IL,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-14472-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

PHILLIP A. RAGAN, JR.,

Defendant.

______________________________________ /

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION

On December 5, 2008, Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder issued a report and

recommendation that the Court sua sponte dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint as for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. On December 22, 2008, the Court adopted the report and recommendation on the basis

that none of the parties to this action filed objections. On that same day, Plaintiff Gregory Lamar

Price-Il filed a response brief to Defendant Phillip A. Ragan, Jr.’s motion to dismiss. While the

magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint for reasons independent of Defendant’s

motion to dismiss, the Court will liberally construe the pleading to evaluate any reasonable

objections to the report and recommendation. Cf. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519-520-21 (1972).

Magistrate Judge Binder recommended that the Court sua sponte dismiss Plaintiff’s

complaint because it advances a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Defendant, a private attorney

retained by Plaintiff in a criminal matter. As the report noted, a private attorney, whether retained

or appointed by a court, is not considered a state actors subject to liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Dkt. # 5 at 3 (citing Polk County v. Dodson, 454 U.S. 325 (1981) and Mills v. Criminal Dist. Court

No. 3, 837 F.2d 677, 679 (6th cir. 1988)). Consequently, the Court would not have jurisdiction over

1:08-cv-14472-TLL-CEB Doc # 8 Filed 01/06/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 26
-2-

the complaint on the basis of 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The magistrate judge also observed that underlying

claims of legal malpractice would not provide the federal court with subject matter jurisdiction. Id.

Plaintiff’s response brief does not provide any authority or argument in support of the proposition

that Defendant acted under the color of law. Rather, it recites the text of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and other

alleged causes of action. The inclusion of these statutory citations does not address the defect in the

Court’s jurisdiction identified in the report and recommendation. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt.

# 5] is ADOPTED. 

 It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s response brief, construed as an objection, [Dkt. #

6] is OVERRULED. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: January 6, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on January 6, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cv-14472-TLL-CEB Doc # 8 Filed 01/06/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 27
EXHIBIT 99.1


                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-0XLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of HBOA Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the twelve months ending December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary Verdier, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company


/s/ Gary Verdier
------------------------
Gary Verdier
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman
April 29, 2003


















6007695
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15747]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[WY-989-1050-P]


Filing of Plats of Survey; Wyoming

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Wyoming State Office, Cheyenne, 
Wyoming, thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this publication.

Sixth Principal Meridian, Wyoming

T. 49 N., R. 72 W., accepted May 20, 1996
T. 15 N., R. 76 W., accepted June 6, 1996
T. 53 N., R. 101 W., accepted May 20, 1996
T. 56 N., R. 103 W., accepted May 20, 1996

Sixth Principal Meridian, Nebraska

T. 25 N., R. 10 E., accepted May 31, 1996
T. 33 N., R. 4 W., accepted May 31, 1996

    If protests against a survey, as shown on any of the above plats, 
are received prior to the official filing, the filing will be stayed 
pending consideration of the protests(s) and or appeals(s). A plat will 
not be officially filed until after disposition of protest(s) or 
appeal(s). These plats will be placed in the open files of the Wyoming 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 5353 Yellowstone Road, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming, and will be available to the public as a matter of 
information only. Copies of the plats will be made available upon 
request and prepayment of the reproduction fee of $1.10 per copy.
    A person or party who wishes to protest a survey must file with the 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming, a notice 
of protest prior to thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this 
publication. If the protest notice did not include a statement of 
reasons for the protest, the protestant shall file such a statement 
with the State Director within thirty (30) calendar days after the 
notice of protest was filed.
    The above-listed plats represent dependent resurveys, subdivision 
of sections.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, P.O. Box 
1828, 5353 Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

    Dated: June 11, 1996.
John P. Lee,
Chief, Cadastral Survey Group.
[FR Doc. 96-15747 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-M