MIED (Rev. 4/11) Notice of Email Delivery Failure

United States District Court 

Eastern District of Michigan 

Notice of E-mail Delivery Failure Directed to 

On ________________, an electronic “Delivery Failure Report” was received by the court after 

an entry was made on the court record in case number: ______________________. 

An e-mail delivery failure will occur when the attorney does not keep his/her e-filing account 

properly updated with a valid e-mail address. 

Failure to provide the court with a correct e-mail address is a violation of the Electronic Filing 

Policies and Procedures R3 (c).* If a filing user has an obsolete e-mail address associated 

with his/her profile, the filing user must update the information immediately. The filing user 

should also review his/her active cases using a PACER account for all missed filings. This 

notice will be entered on the court record under the provisions of LR 11.1. Sanctions may be 

imposed if additional violations occur after this date.**

An e-mail delivery failure can also occur when the intended NEF recipient experiences some 

kind of temporary technical disruption. Upon notification, the filing user should make every 

effort to correct the disruption as soon as possible. The filing user should also monitor his/her 

active cases using a PACER account until the technical disruption has been resolved. 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or 

counsel of record on this date, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

DAVID J. WEAVER, CLERK OF COURT 

By: ________________________________ 

 Deputy Clerk 

Dated: ____________________________ 

* Rule 3 Eligibility, Registration, Passwords states, in part: 

(c) Each filing user is responsible for maintaining valid contact information in his or her ECF Registration account profile. 

When a user’s contact information changes, the user must promptly update his or her ECF Registration account profile. If 

the filing user has a pending case before the Court, the user must also promptly notify all parties in all cases. Electronic 

service upon an obsolete e-mail address will constitute valid service if the user has not updated the account profile with the 

new e-mail address. 

** LR 11.1 Sanctions for Non-Compliance with Local Rules 

If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the Court determines that a provision of these Local Rules has been 

knowingly violated, the Court may impose an appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have 

violated the Local Rule or are responsible for the violation. The procedures for imposing sanctions and the nature of 

sanctions shall be as set out in Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c). For purposes of this rule, references in Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c) to 

violations of "subdivision (b)" are deemed to be references to violations of the Local Rules, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2)(A) 

does not apply.

James P. Murphy 

September 20, 2011

09-cv-10454

s/Kelly Clark

September 21, 2011

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 117 Filed 09/22/11 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 2935
Your 

message: Mail delivery failed

was not 

delivered to:

because:

What should you do?

z You can resend the undeliverable document to the recipients listed above by choosing the Resend button or the 

Resend command on the Actions menu. 

z Once you have resent the document you may delete this Delivery Failure Report.

z If resending the document is not successful you will receive a new failure report.

z Unless you receive other Delivery Failure Reports, the document was successfully delivered to all other 

recipients.

Routing path

USHUB03/H/US/USCOURTS, 06MIEMAIL01a/M/06/USCOURTS

To: cmecfadmin@mied.uscourts.gov

cc: 

Date: 11:42:25 AM CST Yesterday

Subject: Mail delivery failed

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you have sent could not be delivered to one or more

recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address failed:

 <murph@berrymoorman.com>: 550 5.1.1 User unknown

Included is a copy of the message header:

-----------------------------------------

Received: from unknown [206.18.112.205] (EHLO icmecf202.gtwy.uscourts.gov)

 by p01c12m103.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.11.0-4)

 with ESMTP id 

b70d87e4.0.12864.00-2192.19809.p01c12m103.mxlogic.net (envelope-from 

<cmecfadmin@mied.uscourts.gov>);

 Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:19 -0600 (MDT)

X-SBRS: None

X-REMOTE-IP: 156.125.161.32

X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,412,1312171200"; 

 d="scan'208";a="264590654"

Received: from unknown (HELO mieddb.mied.circ6.dcn) ([156.125.161.32])

 by icmecf202.gtwy.uscourts.gov with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2011 13:42:18 -0400

Received: from mieddb.mied.circ6.dcn (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])

 by mieddb.mied.circ6.dcn (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 

p8KHg1dc021114;

 Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:42:03 -0400

Received: (from ecf_web@localhost)

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 117 Filed 09/22/11 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 2936
 by mieddb.mied.circ6.dcn (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id 

p8KHfUNs020941;

 Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:41:30 -0400

Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:41:30 -0400

MIME-Version: 1.0

From: cmecfadmin@mied.uscourts.gov

To: cmecfadmin@mied.uscourts.gov

Message-Id: <4510649@mied.uscourts.gov>

Subject: Activity in Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Braintech, Incorporated v. 

Shafi Set Deadlines/Hearings

Content-Type: text/html

2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 117 Filed 09/22/11 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 2937