alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICEOFTHEA-ITORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

gal opinion of th5.a deoertalo add04 

between the . 

ir not tn 8e8sbm at 

rel501ut1an on tils 

ure,wruld theaovernor 

to appoint a eom6i8elenrith a aot0ifedoa4r or 

4 of Tat811 to outer iota 

king toward futmation of a tenipaet 

med by the legfelatnres of Taaua 

the Uaitul atateot* 

to adtim, a6 pu wme adrlsed in Oginfon 

No, o-4242, that the mgirlaturerr of Oklahoma aad Wm3.n 

OoQld lawfully tmttw tit0 ouoh a oo~ipact ae uaa th1We5.n suggeated with reScenaeto tbMng andhuatkngin tkome ax-w 

ot the l ta t4 a lauadet4d W the ua ter s o f Denla o a b a a , b ut 

uf art hot rdTf8ed a8 to whether or not the do~lsrnor of Oklahoao could appotat a aomxtdssioaer to aegcW.ate vith a ecmalcafoaer Srea Texas to Pomulate suab a aoapsat. Ilo dfxxbt 
gzr t ~OUOV~Q fotwulated oould a:awquenbl~ be apby the ~egtdwtrea 41 Oklahoara aad Texfw. 

APPROVED 

OPINION (I COMMlTrKL 

BY L&F *
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et. al.,

 Defendant.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-SPL(BSB)

ORDER RE:

DEFENDANTS’ SECOND 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND 

TO UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO 

RESOLVE ATTORNEY-CLIENT 

PRIVILEGE ISSUES 

The Court having reviewed and considered Defendant Brunst’s Second 

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to United States’ Motion to 

Resolve Attorney-Client Privilege Issues, with no objection by the Government, and 

good cause showing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED extending the otherwise applicable time for 

filing all Defendants’ responses to the Government’s Motion to Resolve Privilege 

Issues (Doc. 195) for a period of one additional week and the responses will be due 

on or before July 20, 2018. 

The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) from _______ to 

_______.

Dated: __________________

_____________________________

Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 214-1 Filed 07/11/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

June 21, 1996.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the focus group interviews 
described below in mid July 1996, the Department of Treasury is 
requesting that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and 
approve this information collection by July 5, 1996. To obtain a copy 
of this survey, please contact the IRS Clearance Officer at the address 
listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1432.
    Project Number: M:SP:V 96-015-G.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Helena Customer Satisfaction Survey.
    Description: As a Treasury Reinvention Laboratory, the Helena 
District is striving to develop a new management system which is 
responsive to our customers' values. By measuring customer satisfaction 
with existing services and clearly identifying customer expectations, 
the Helena District will have the tools for developing a customer 
focused improvement strategy to continually monitor and improve the 
service it delivers. To accomplish this, the Helena District proposes 
to actively solicit taxpayer opinions through the utilization of a 
district-wide survey to measure the level of customer satisfaction.
    Respondents: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,817.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 3 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 141 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Milo Sunderhauf, (202) 395-7340, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-16507 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 10 
EXHIBIT 10 

Objectionable Fees 

Chris Davis Lexis and Westlaw Research Charges 

Date Attorney Time Fee 

11/3/2008 Davis .80 $200.00

11/11/2008 Davis 1.50 375.00

12/10/2008 Davis 3.00 750.00

12/18/2008 Davis 1.00 250.00

1/6/2009 Davis 5.00 1,250.00

1/7/2009 Davis 3.50 875.00

2/6/2009 Davis 1.20 300.00

2/25/2009 Davis 2.00 500.00

3/11/2009 Davis .20 50.00

3/15/2009 Davis 1.50 375.00

3/26/2009 Davis 1.20 300.00

3/31/2009 Davis 1.00 250.00

4/8/2009 Davis 1.50 375.00

4/16/2009 Davis 1.00 250.00

4/20/2009 Davis .50 125.00

4/22/2009 Davis 1.50 375.00

5/15/2009 Davis 1.00 250.00

6/16/2009 Davis 2.50 625.00

8/3/2009 Davis 1.10 275.00

9/2/2009 Davis .50 125.00

9/13/2009 Davis 5.00 1,250.00

10/5/2009 Davis 2.00 500.00

11/9/2009 Davis 2.00 125.00

11/14/2009 Davis 3.00 187.50

11/16/2009 Davis 1.00 125.00

11/16/2009 Davis 2.00 250.00

11/18/2009 Davis 1.50 187.50

11/19/2009 Davis 3.00 375.00

11/20/2009 Davis .60 75.00

11/25/2009 Davis 4.00 500.00

12/1/2009 Davis 3.00 375.00

12/2/2009 Davis 2.00 250.00

12/8/2009 Davis 2.50 312.50

12/10/2009 Davis 1.50 187.50

12/11/2009 Davis 3.00 375.00

12/28/2009 Davis 1.00 250.00

Grand Total 68.60 $13,200.00

264302
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sawadee Ventures (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rachna Khanna, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Rachna Khanna
-----------------------------------
Rachna Khanna
Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MIE 800 Generic Notice of Hearing (Rev. 3/98)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

PETER HENDRICKSON,

Defendant(s).

/

CASE NUMBER: 08-20585

HONORABLE GERALD E. ROSEN

NOTICE OF: RESENTENCING HEARING

You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable Gerald E. Rosen, Chief United

States District Judge for the above proceeding on:

DATE TIME ROOM 733

May 15, 2012 3:00 p.m. Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse

231 W. Lafayette

Detroit, Michigan 48226

*THE COURT HAS ORDERED THAT ATTORNEY JACK R. HENDRICKSON, JR. BE

PRESENT FOR THE ABOVE HEARING, AS WELL AS CURRENT COUNSEL FOR THE

DEFENDANT, STAND-BY COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT AND COUNSEL FOR THE

GOVERNMENT. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on May 1, 2012,

by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Ruth A.Gunther 

Case Manager

(313) 234-5137

2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Doc # 131 Filed 05/01/12 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 2204
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALI SAREINI,

Plaintiff, Case Number 08-13961 

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

 v.

MICHAEL MARTIN,

Defendant.

_______________________________________/

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

On September 23, 2008, pro se prisoner Plaintiff Ali Sareini was granted leave to proceed

without prepayment of fees in this action. ECF No. 3. On January 22, 2010, the Court entered an

order adopting in part and rejecting in part Magistrate Judge Virginia Morgan’s report and

recommendation, overruling Plaintiff’s objections, granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s

objections, and granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. ECF

No. 72. The Court’s opinion and order dismissed Plaintiff’s religious property claim, Plaintiff’s

religious holiday banquet claim under the Free Exercise Clause, and Plaintiff’s Equal Protection

claim, resulting in only his religious diet claim regarding cross-contamination of the vegetarian meal

options remaining. On April 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, which the Court

denied on September 1, 2011. ECF Nos. 74, 75. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to

proceed without prepayment of fees on appeal. ECF No. 80. Plaintiff was permitted to proceed

without prepayment of fees in this Court; thus, further authorization is not required. Fed. R. App.

P. 24(a)(3). Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees on appeal.

Plaintiff has also filed a motion for a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability

1:08-cv-13961-TLL-VMM Doc # 81 Filed 12/14/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 1011
-2-

is required only in certain types of cases, typically habeas corpus proceedings brought pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 2254 and 2255. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). A certificate of appealability is not required,

however, to appeal a district court order denying relief for claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. Johnson v. CCA-Northeast Oh. Corr. Ctr., 21 F. App’x 330, 332 (6th Cir. 2001).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of

fees (ECF No. 80) is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a certificate of appealability (ECF No.77)

is DENIED.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: December 14, 2011

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each

attorney or party of record herein by electronic means and upon Ali Sareini, #203519,

at Newberry Correctional Facility, 3001 Newberry Avenue, Newberry, MI 49868 by

first class U.S. mail on December 14, 2011.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cv-13961-TLL-VMM Doc # 81 Filed 12/14/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 1012
Order filed, June 02, 201 6

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00116

- CV

____________ OSAMA ABDULLATIF AND ALI MOKARAM , Appellant

V.

ALI CHOUNDHRI , Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 27197



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due May 12, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Be cause the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order My Thuy Cieslar , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,in connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-Q of CMP Susquehanna Radio HoldingsCorporation. (the “Company”) for the six month period endedSeptember 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedofficers of the Company certifies, that, to such officer’s knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for theperiods expressed in the Report.     /s/ Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.     Name: Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
#### Craig S. ADAMS, Appellant, v. Gary D. JAMES, et al., Respondents.

No. 67304.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Aug. 8, 1995.

Motions for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Sept. 25, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Oct. 24, 1995.

*870Craig S. Adams, appellant, acting pro se.

Gary D. James, et al., respondents, acting pro se.

Before SMITH, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and RHODES, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Craig S. Adams, appeals from the judgment in his court-tried defamation action against respondents Gary D. James, Connie Roberts, and James Van Amburg. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by the evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.52


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


PLAINS ALL AMERICAN GP LLC


1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


 


December 4, 2008


 


By resolution of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
of Plains All American GP LLC, the Plains All American GP LLC 1998 Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.             Section 8 of
the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following subsection (j) at the
end thereof:


 


(j)            Section 409A.  It is the intent that each Award under this
Plan shall either (i) qualify as a “short term deferral” as such phrase is
used in Section 409A of the Code or (ii) comply with the requirements
of Section 409A.  In that regard,
notwithstanding anything in any Award to the contrary, (i) in no event
shall payment of or under an Award be made later than 21⁄2 months following the
year in which such payment ceases to be subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture for purposes of Section 409A; (ii) for any Award in which
all or a portion becomes “nonforfeitable” upon the occurrence of an event, the
relevant provisions of such Award shall be deemed to include a proviso that (i) to
the extent all requirements for vesting but for the passage of time have been
met as of the occurrence of such event, payment shall be made as of the next
following Distribution Date and (ii) to the extent additional vesting
would require the achievement of additional performance thresholds (e.g.
distribution or earnings levels), vesting shall occur and payment made (if
based on a distribution) on the Distribution Date on which the threshold is
achieved or (if based on earnings or other performance metric) the next
Distribution Date following the date on which the threshold is achieved.  For this purpose, as used herein and in any
Award, the phrase “Distribution Date” shall mean the day in February, May, August or
November in any year (as such month and year are specified in the Award or
as context dictates; e.g., the “next following Distribution Date” after the
occurrence of an event) that is 45 days after the end of a calendar quarter
(or, if not a business day, the closest previous business day).
Exhibit 20

                      The Daniel Professional Group, Inc.
                          Certified Public Accountants

                       4440 Silas Creek Parkway, Suite 200
                            Winston-Salem, NC 27104
                                  910-768-3290
                                Fax 910-768-7666

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Diversified Senior Services, Inc. and Subsidiary

          We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Diversified Senior Services, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholder's deficit, and of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1997
and for the period from May 17, 1996 to December 31, 1996. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.

          We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

          As described in Note 11, the Company completed its initial public
offering on January 14, 1998.

          In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of Diversified Senior Services, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31,
1997 and 1996, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows for
the periods indicated, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

/s/ The Daniel Professional Group, Inc.
The Daniel Professional Group, Inc.

February 24, 1998
Winston-Salem, North Carolina

principles.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33956-33957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

RTCA, Inc. Special Committee 186; Automatic Dependent 
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee 186 meeting to be held July 15-16, 1996, beginning at 
9:00 a.m. The meeting will

[[Page 33957]]

be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, 
Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks/Review 
of Meeting Agenda; (2) Review and Approval of Minutes of the Previous 
Meeting; (3) Report of Working Group Activities: a. Working Group 1 
Report (Operations Working Group); b. Working Group 2 Report (Technical 
Working Group); c. Working Group 3 Report (CDTI Working Group); (4) 
Review of Open Items in Chapter 1 of the MASPS; (5) Review of Chapter 2 
of the MASPS; (6) Other Business; (7) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone) or (202) 833-9434 (fax). Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 24, 1996.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 96-16736 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-13-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER

Having considered Defendants Michael Lacey’s and James Larkin’s Motion for 

Leave to File Over-Length Opposition to United States’ Motion to Resolve Privilege 

Issues and Cross Motion to Obtain and Address Privilege Issues, and good cause 

appearing:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

DATED this ___ day of _______________, 20___

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 225-1 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 991 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 991

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 19, 2010.
Whereas the University of Virginia men's soccer team won the 2009 Division I 
        national championship, defeating the University of Akron at WakeMed 
        Soccer Park in Cary, North Carolina, on December 13, 2009;
Whereas the University of Virginia played through 2 sudden-death overtimes and a 
        penalty-kick shootout to defeat the University of Akron;
Whereas goaltenders Diego Restrepo from the University of Virginia and David 
        Meves from the University of Akron held both teams scoreless through 
        regulation and overtime;
Whereas Sean Hiller scored the game-winning goal in the penalty kick shootout;
Whereas goalkeeper Diego Restrepo made 3 saves in regulation, 1 save in the 
        penalty kick shootout, and was named defensive most valuable player of 
        the College Cup;
Whereas midfielder Jonathan Villanueva earned recognition as offensive most 
        valuable player of the College Cup; and
Whereas head coach George Gelnovatch led the University of Virginia to its sixth 
        national championship and first since 1994: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the University of 
Virginia men's soccer team for winning the 2009 Division I NCAA National 
Championship.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32814-32815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16138]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 32815]]


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1117-DR]


Kentucky; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Kentucky, (FEMA-1117-DR), dated June 1, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 13, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Kentucky, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 1, 1996:

Owsley and Perry Counties for Public Assistance and Hazard 
Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-16138 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P