alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet as of December 31, 1997 and Statements of Operations, Stockholders' Equity
and Cash Flows for the period March 6, 1997 (inception) to December 31, 1997.

</LEGEND>
       
<S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              80
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    80
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           408
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       499
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  99
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,796)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
|   | (i) |   | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                            |   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|--------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Peter D. Thompson           |   |   |
|   |   |                            |   |   |
|   |   | Name: Peter D. Thompson         |   |   |
|   |   | Title: Executive Vice President |   |   |
|   |   | and Chief Financial Officer     |   |   |
**EXHIBIT 23.01****CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Interwoven, Inc.:     Form S-8 333-88725 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan;Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-39914 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan;Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;Interwoven, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan     Form S-8 333-42690 Stock options granted by Neonyoyo, Inc. under its 2000Stock Plan, as amended, and assumed by the Interwoven,Inc.     Form S-8 333-46662 Interwoven, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan     Form S-8 333-49926 Stock Options Granted by Ajuba Solutions, Inc. underits 1998 Stock Option Plan, as Amended, and Assumed byInterwoven, Inc.; Stock Options Granted by MetacodeTechnologies Inc. under its 1995 Stock Option Plan, asAmended, and Assumed by Interwoven, Inc.     Form S-8 333-54250 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan;Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-87186 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-104814 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-106819 Stock options granted by MediaBin, Inc. under its 1994Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, as amended,and assumed by Interwoven, Inc.; Stock options grantedby MediaBin, Inc. under its 2001 Stock Option Plan, asamended, and assumed by Interwoven, Inc.     Form S-8 333-110586 Stock options granted by iManage, Inc. under its 1997Stock Option Plan, as amended, and assumed byInterwoven, Inc.; Stock options granted by iManage,Inc. under its 2000 Non-Officer Stock Option Plan, asamended, and assumed by Interwoven, Inc.; iManage,Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended,and assumed by Interwoven, Inc.; Non-plan stockoptions of iManage, Inc. assumed by Interwoven, Inc.;Interwoven, Inc. 2003 Acquisition Plan     Form S-8 333-114801 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-124414 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-127960 Stock options granted by Scrittura, Inc. under its2005 Stock Option Plan and assumed by Interwoven, Inc.     Form S-8 333-133642 Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan     Form S-8 333-149377 Options granted by Optimost LLC under its 2006 EquityCompensation Plan and assumed by Interwoven, Inc.;Interwoven, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Planof ourreports dated March 14, 2008 with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Interwoven, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofInterwoven, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLPSan Francisco, California
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Cristina C. Arguedas (Cal. Bar No. 87787)

Ted W. Cassman (Cal. Bar No. 98932)

Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, LLP 

803 Hearst Avenue

Berkeley, CA 94710

Telephone: (510) 845-3000

Email: arguedas@achlaw.com

cassman@achlaw.com

Attorneys for James Larkin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) NO. CR 18-0422-PHX-SPL

)

Plaintiff, ) MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS

) DEFENDANT JAMES LARKIN’S

vs. ) ATTORNEYS

)

JAMES LARKIN, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

)

Pursuant to Local Rule 83-3(b), Cristina C. Arguedas, Ted W. Cassman and 

Julie Salamon of Arguedas, Cassman & Headley, LLP, hereby move to withdraw as 

attorneys of record in this matter. The motion is made on the grounds, as confirmed 

by the accompanying Declaration of James Larkin (Exhibit A), that Mr. Larkin has 

decided that he does not wish to be represented by said attorneys. Mr. Larkin is 

currently also represented by James C. Grant and of Davis, Wright Tremaine, LLP

so he will not be without representation and counsels’ withdrawal will not result in

//

//

//

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 115 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

any delay or disruption of the proceedings. 

Dated: April 23, 2018

/s/__________________

TED W. CASSMAN, 

Attorney for Defendant James Larkin

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 115 Filed 04/24/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3021-3022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1695]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP85-181-010]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Refund 
Report and Request To Terminate Proceedings

January 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 11, 1996, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) filed a report of an agreement and refund 
report with Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Columbia) to resolve 
the issues and disputes in Docket No. RP85-181 and the related appeals 
pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit (Panhandle Eastern v. FERC No. 94-1727). Under the 
agreement, Texas Gas states that it will refund to Columbia a principal 
amount of $11,948,555.73, $1,468,424.44 in interest for the period 2/
11/94 to the date of refund, and additional interest of $850,000 for 
the period prior to 2/11/94.
    Texas Gas states Columbia and Texas Gas have filed with the United 
States Court of Appeals to withdraw their pending appeals cited above. 
Texas Gas and Columbia request that the Commission issue an order 
accepting the refund report and terminating the proceedings in Docket 
No. RP85-181, conditioned, as necessary, upon an order of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

[[Page 3022]]
granting the motions to withdraw the appeals of the orders issued in 
Docket No. RP85-181.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. Any person wishing to protest said 
filing, must file a protest on or before January 31, 1996. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make portestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1695 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40131 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO GARCIA ALMANZAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-742-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Garcia Almanzan appeals his guilty-plea conviction of being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and 1326(b). Almanzan argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. He concedes that this issue is foreclosed but seeks to preserve review by the Supreme Court.No. 05-40131 -2- Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See United States v. Rivera , 265 F.3d 310, 312 (5th Cir. 2001). This argument is foreclosed. Rivera , 265 F.3d at 312. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL J. CULOTTA                           
|Michael J. Culotta                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 3, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL J. CULOTTA                           
|Michael J. Culotta                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 4, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN HAMILTON, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Case No. 01-CV-74698

(LOCAL CASE)

SUSAN HALL, et al., HON. AVERN COHN

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER RE: MOTIONS

This is a civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 with pendent state

claims. Before the Court are the following motions: 

1. Van Buren Defendants’ Motion to Compel

2. The Southgate Defendants’ Motion to Compel the Continued Deposition of

Edward Gardocki, in which the Inkster Defendants concur

3. The Inkster Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

The motions were heard on September 19, 2007. 

The Van Buren Defendants’ motion to compel is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall

furnish a summary statement of attorney fees and litigation costs within one (1) week. 

The Van Buren Defendants may depose Hamilton on the information provided in the

summary statement.

The Southgate Defendants’ motion to compel is GRANTED. The Southgate

Defendants and the Inkster Defendants shall have one (1) hour collectively in which to
2

depose Gardocki.

The Inkster Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is HELD IN ABEYANCE. 

The Inkster Defendants shall file an amended statement of material facts not in dispute

within fifteen (15) days in accordance with the Court’s directive at the hearing. Plaintiffs

shall have fifteen (15) days thereafter to respond. The parties are directed to the

Court’s Briefing Guidelines for assistance in preparation of the statement and response,

available on-line at: 

http://www.mied.uscourts.gov/Judges/guidelines/topic.cfm?topic_id=89

SO ORDERED.

 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 20, 2007

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, September 20, 2007, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
Case 2:08-cv-15018-JAC-MJH   ECF No. 117-3, PageID.2883   Filed 09/09/13   Page 1 of 3

Case 2:08-cv-15018-JAC-MJH   ECF No. 117-3, PageID.2884   Filed 09/09/13   Page 2 of 3

Case 2:08-cv-15018-JAC-MJH   ECF No. 117-3, PageID.2885   Filed 09/09/13   Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICOLE BROOKS,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-10410

v. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on January 28, 2010 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

On November 30, 2009, Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer issued a Report and

Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Nicole Brooks’s

motion for summary judgment and grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social

Security’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R. 

Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and the

record as a whole, the Court fully concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and

adopts the R & R in its entirety.

Accordingly,

2:09-cv-10410-GER-DAS Doc # 20 Filed 01/28/10 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 463
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s

November 30, 2009 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R & R, Plaintiff’s

August 7, 2009 motion for summary judgment (docket #13) is DENIED, and Defendant’s

November 9, 2009 motion for summary judgment (docket #18) is GRANTED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: January 28, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on January 28, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Ruth Brissaud 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10410-GER-DAS Doc # 20 Filed 01/28/10 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 464
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) on the Form 10-Q of Siga Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended April 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bob Hogarth, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: October 2, 2013  /s/ Bob Hogarth Bob Hogarth Chief Accounting Officer Chief Financial Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1696]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP90-137-029]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Refund 
Report

January 24, 1996.
    Take notice that on January 5, 1996, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing with the 
Commission, under protest, its Refund Report made in compliance with 
ordering Paragraph (D) of the Commission's ``Order Denying Rehearing, 
Granting Requests for Exemptions and Ordering Refunds'' issued December 
6, 1995 in Docket Nos. RP90-137-020 RP90-137-021, RP90-137-022, RP90-
137-023, RP90-137-025 and RP90-137-026.
    Williston Basin states that on December 22, 1995, refunds were sent 
to applicable shippers for the take-or-pay volumetric surcharge amounts 
previously collected through transportation rates charged for the gas 
placed in storage in accordance with Rate Schedule S-2 Service 
Agreements between Williston Basin and such applicable shippers. These 
refunds, for the period November 1, 1990 through August 31, 1995, also 
include interest through December 22, 1995, in accordance with Section 
154.501 of the Commission's Regulations.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before January 31, 1996. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make Protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1696 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

ITC^DeltaCom, Inc.

Huntsville, Ala.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-149192, 333-139202, 333-111329 and 333-101007) of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. of our reports dated March 19, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
|                    
|Atlanta, Georgia    
|March 19, 2008
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50502 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RAFAEL PRECIADO

- VEGA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 526

- 4

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Rafael Preciado

- Vega has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Preciado

- Vega h a s not filed a response. We have review ed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 21, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50502 Document: 00514396065 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/21/2018No. 17

- 50502

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-50502 Document: 00514396065 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/21/2018
**EXHIBIT 21.01****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**Interwoven, Inc. has the following subsidiaries:   Corporation Name JurisdictionInterwoven AB Sweden   Interwoven Australia Pty. Ltd. Australia   Interwoven BV The Netherlands   Interwoven Canada Ltd. Canada   Interwoven GmbH Germany   Interwoven Hong Kong Ltd. Hong Kong   Interwoven Japan KK Japan   Interwoven Korea Inc. Korea   Interwoven SARL France   Interwoven Software Pte. Ltd. Singapore   Interwoven Software Services India Private Limited India   Interwoven Software SL Spain   Interwoven Srl Italy   Interwoven UK Ltd. United Kingdom   Optimost Limited United Kingdom   Optimost LLC United States