alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,775
<INVENTORY>                                      3,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,460
<PP&E>                                          38,722
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,927
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           197
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,820
<SALES>                                        135,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,543
<CGS>                                           90,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   693
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,286
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,286
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34908-34911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17033]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 34909]]

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Budget Rescission and Deferrals

To the Congress of the United States:

    In accordance with the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control 
Act of 1974, I herewith report one revised deferral of budgetary 
resources, totaling $7.4 million. The deferral affects the Social 
Security Administration.
William J. Clinton.
The White House,
June 24, 1996.

BILLING CODE 3110-01-M
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JY96.012

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JY96.013


[[Page 34910]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JY96.014




[[Page 34911]]


[FR Doc. 96-17033 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 259 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John W. Combs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.

Date: May 6, 2010



By:

/s/ John W. CombsName:

John W. CombsTitle:

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenced into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made on or before or after the date of this Report), irrespective at any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

NATHAN WYATT,

Petitioner,

Case Number 09-10285-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

MILLICENT WARREN,

Respondent.

_____________________________________/

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

On January 12, 2010, the Court denied Petitioner Nathan Wyatt’s petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 18, 2010, Petitioner filed an application

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Dkt. #14], and a motion for certificate of appealability [Dkt.

#15]. When the Court denied Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus on January 12, 2010,

the Court denied Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, because an appeal would

be frivolous and could not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The Court also

denied Petitioner a certificate of appealability because he did not make a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal [Dkt. #14] and motion for certificate of appealability [Dkt. #15] are DENIED.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: March 1, 2010
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on March 1, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00349-CR

Patrick Washington

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F-2010-0503-C)

July 25, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Charles E. ChristmasCharles E. ChristmasSenior Vice President, Chief          Financial Officer and Treasurer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1 

Timothy J. Eckstein, 018321 

Joseph N. Roth, 025725 

Sarah P. Lawson, 036436 

OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 

2929 North Central Avenue, 20th Floor 

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2793 

(602) 640-9000 

teckstein@omlaw.com

jroth@omlaw.com

slawson@omlaw.com

Attorneys for the Estate of James Larkin 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

 

vs. 

James Larkin (2), et al.,

 Defendants. 

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JOSEPH N. 

ROTH IN SUPPORT OF MOTION 

TO ENFORCE ABATEMENT OF 

PROSECUTION 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, Joseph N. Roth, declare as follows: 

1. I am a member of the law firm Osborn Maledon, PA, counsel for the Estate 

of James Larkin (the “Estate”). 

2. Attached as Exhibit B to the Motion to Enforce Abatement of Prosecution 

is a true, correct, and complete copy of the First Amended Consolidated Master Verified 

Complaint for Forfeiture in the civil forfeiture action currently pending in the Central 

District of California, United States v. $1,546,076.35 in Bank Funds Seized from Republic 

Bank of Arizona Account ‘1889, Lead Case No. CV 18-1840-RGK (the “Civil Forfeiture 

Action”). 

3. Attached as Exhibit C to the Motion are true, correct, and complete copies 

of the following documents recorded in Maricopa County, Arizona: “Waiver of 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1856-1 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2 

Homestead Exemption” and “Agreement to Forfeit Real Property to Obtain a Defendant’s 

Release.” 

4. With regard to the properties and other assets listed at pages 2-3 of the

Motion, no defendant hasfiled a claim to any of these assetsin the Civil Forfeiture Action, 

nor is the Estate aware of any possible such claim. 

5. The government has not contended that any remaining defendant has

asserted or is reasonably expected to assert an interest in any of the properties and other 

assets listed at pages 2-3 of the Motion. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed this 13th day of October, 2023. 

 /s/Joseph N. Roth

 Joseph N. Roth 

10108016.1 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1856-1 Filed 10/13/23 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated September 11, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and scheduleand management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Pervasive Software Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Pervasive Software Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-116957, File No. 333-104770, File No. 333-70604, File No. 333-57500, File No. 333-92707, FileNo. 333-67659 and File No. 333-37347). 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas

September 22, 2006
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.28    
    


 
 

  JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC.    
    
    OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM(1)    
    



				
	 Annual Board cash retainer
	 	$100,000	(2)
	 Annual Board stock retainer grant
	 	

$100,000
 immediate vesting	 
	 Annual Committee cash retainer (per Committee)
	 	

$  10,000	 
	 Additional annual cash retainer for Audit Committee Chair
	 	

$  25,000	 
	 Additional annual cash retainer for Compensation Committee Chair, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair and
Planning and Strategy Committee Chair
	 	

$  15,000	 
	 Lead or Presiding Director annual stock retainer grant
	 	

$  35,000	 
	 Non-Executive Chairman: additional annual cash retainer (payable in equal quarterly installments)
	 	

$250,000	 
	 Non-Executive Chairman: additional stock retainer grant
	 	

$470,000
 immediate vesting	
(3)

	 Board: one-time restricted stock grant upon joining
	 	

$100,000
 3-year vesting	 











 Notes:  


	1.
	For
the April 30, 2009 through April 28, 2010 time period, the directors have agreed to a 20 percent reduction to the above amounts. All
amounts are subject to proration if director joins after commencement of directors' fiscal year (fiscal year begins on date of Annual Shareholders' Meeting). 



All
compensation may be deferred at the election of a director under the Company's Directors Deferred Fee Plan. Equity awards are deferred in the form of restricted stock units. 



	2.
	In
2007, the Board determined to eliminate the payment of fees for participating in meetings in favor of annual retainers. In the event of extraordinary
circumstances that require a material increase in the number of Committee and/or Board meetings, the Board may reinstate meeting fees or adjust the annual retainer amounts as deemed appropriate by the
Board.



	3.
	The
additional $470,000 stock retainer is for fiscal year 2007-2008, and may be adjusted, reduced or eliminated based on the Compensation
Committee's and Board's annual evaluation. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.28


JANUS CAPITAL GROUP INC. OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM(1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PETER HENDRICKSON,

Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

/

Criminal No. 08-20585-01

Civil No. 11-11603

HONORABLE GERALD E. ROSEN

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Opinion and Order entered and filed on this date, April

24, 2013, judgment is entered in favor of the respondent and the case is DISMISSED.

DAVID WEAVER

Dated: April 24, 2013 By: S/Julie Owens

 Deputy Clerk

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, April 24, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Doc # 144 Filed 04/24/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 2295
No. 72-5794.

#### Davis *v.*Alaska.

Sup. Ct. Alaska. [Certiorari granted, 410 U. S. 925.] Motion of Arthur Bembury for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted.
The Hon. John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of

1

Minnesota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2113SI

_____________

Marlene E. Dohrn, *

*

Appellant, * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court

v. * for the Southern District

* of Iowa.

*

Circle B. Cashway, Inc., * [Not to be Published.]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 15, 1999

Filed: January 25, 1999

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge. 1

___________

PER CURIAM.

This is a Title VII case. The plaintiff, Marlene E. Dohrn, claims that the

defendant, Circle B. Cashway, Inc., fired her on account of her sex. The defendant

denies this, and states that Ms. Dohrn was in fact discharged because she had shown

herself disloyal to the company by looking for another job in secret. The District
The Hon. Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern

2

District of Iowa.

-2-

Court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the

2

complaint. Having now had the benefit of briefs and oral argument, we affirm.

In our view, plaintiff has not produced enough evidence of pretext to survive

summary judgment. She claims that other employees — men — who had looked for

work elsewhere were not fired, but her evidence of this is hearsay, based not upon her

own personal knowledge but upon what others told her. There is evidence of sexist

remarks made by persons in authority with the employer, but no such remarks were

made by the person who made the decision to fire the plaintiff. The evidence here is

simply not substantial enough to justify a jury verdict in plaintiff's favor, and it was

therefore proper for the District Court to grant summary judgment for the defendant.

The case is not of sufficient precedential significance to justify a fuller

discussion, and we therefore confine ourselves, in the interest of expedition, to this

abbreviated opinion.

Affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TERRY TYRONE SMITH, 

Plaintiff,

Civil No.08-14696

Hon. John Feikens 

v.

STEPHEN GEELHOOD, et al,

Defendant. 

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, filed on

11/13/2009, and noted that no objections were filed by either party, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Report is accepted and entered as the findings and

conclusions of this court. 

s/John Feikens 

John Feikens

United States District Judge

Dated: December 10, 2009

2:08-cv-14696-MAR Doc # 37 Filed 12/10/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 321
2

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this

document was served on the attorneys of record

by electronic means or U.S. Mail on December 10,

2009.

s/Carol Cohron 

Deputy Clerk

2:08-cv-14696-MAR Doc # 37 Filed 12/10/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 322
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-5 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 359
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-5 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 2 of 6 Pg ID 360
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-5 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 3 of 6 Pg ID 361
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-5 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 4 of 6 Pg ID 362
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-5 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 5 of 6 Pg ID 363
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-5 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 6 of 6 Pg ID 364
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30598-30599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15237]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP95-408-010]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 11, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 5, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, to be effective June 6, 1996:

Third Revised Sheet No. 374
Second Revised Sheet No. 385

    Columbia states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the tariff changes directed to be made in Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corp., 75 FERC para. 61,199 (1996). In compliance with that order, and 
as further explained in Columbia's filing, Columbia is making tariff 
changes to allow for certain permissible cost-free inventory transfers 
among SIT service agreements; to incorporate procedures for posting 
information concerning any grant of emergency relief from interruption 
in the event of a firm capacity curtailment on Columbia's system 
(Section 16.5 of the General Terms and Conditions (GTC)); to provide 
for the maintenance and availability of information on such grants of 
relief; and to extend assessment of the $25 per dekatherm penalty in 
GTC section 16.5 to parties receiving such emergency relief on the 
basis of materially false representations.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
firm customers, affected state commissions and interruptible customers 
that have made a standing request for service of filings.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public

[[Page 30599]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15237 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John W. Combs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
ShoreTel, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                              
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 10, 2008 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    JOHN W. COMBS                                                         
|                         |  |  |  | Name:  |  | John W. Combs                                                                
|                         |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
s:\Battani\Notices-Forms\SchedOrders\4/07/06.wpd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THE WEATHER UNDERGROUND, INC., Case No. 09-10756

 Honorable Marianne O. Battani

Plaintiff,

v.

NAVIGATION CATALYST

SYSTEMS, INC., et. al.,

Defendants.

 /

SCHEDULING ORDER

EVENT DEADLINE

Status Conference May 12, 2010 at 2:30 p.m.

Discovery Cutoff July 12, 2010

* 7 Oral Depositions may be taken and 30 Written Depositions may be taken.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 1/13/10 s/Marianne O. Battani 

MARIANNE O. BATTANI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon all counsel of record on this date by ordinary mail and/or

electronic filing.

s/Colette Motowski 

Colette Motowski, secretary to 

Judge Marianne O. Battani

DATED: 1/13/11