alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-107201) pertaining to the Ispat International N.V. Global Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,shareholders’ equity and cash flows of Mittal Steel Holdings N.V. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Rotterdam, The Netherlands 

July 2, 2007 

for Ernst & Young Accountants 

/s/ M. Coenradie
EXHIBIT 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Jane A. Freeman, certify that: 1.
        I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Scientific Learning Corporation; 2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.
        The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 10, 2006 /s/ Jane A. Freeman Jane A. Freeman Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Actavision Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  November 6, 2008               /s/ Ching-Sang Hong ------------------------------- Ching-Sang Hong, CEO & CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1068 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1068

 To amend the National Consumer Cooperative Bank Act to allow for the 
   treatment of the nonprofit corporation affiliate of the Bank as a 
    community development financial institution for purposes of the 
 Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2009

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Consumer Cooperative Bank Act to allow for the 
   treatment of the nonprofit corporation affiliate of the Bank as a 
    community development financial institution for purposes of the 
 Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Consumer Cooperative Bank 
Act Amendments of 2009''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BANK AFFILIATE AS COMMUNITY 
              DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.

    Section 211 of the National Consumer Cooperative Bank Act (12 
U.S.C. 3051) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Treatment as Community Development Financial Institution.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the nonprofit corporation 
established under this section shall be deemed to be a community 
development financial institution for purposes of the Community 
Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994, unless, 
after the date of the enactment of the National Consumer Cooperative 
Bank Act Amendments of 2009, the Bank, or any affiliate (as defined in 
section 103(3) of the Community Development Banking and Financial 
Institutions Act of 1994) of the Bank, participates in depository 
institution incentives under section 114 of the Community Development 
Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER

Having considered Defendants Michael Lacey’s and James Larkin’s Motion for 

Leave to File Over-Length Opposition to United States’ Motion to Disqualify Counsel, 

and good cause appearing:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

DATED this ___ day of _______________, 20___

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 179-1 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16239]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Issuance of Permit for Incidental Take of Endangered Species

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 4, 1995, a notice was published in the Federal 
Register (60 FR 39964) that an application had been filed with the U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) by the Riverside County Habitat 
Conservation Agency for a permit to incidentally take, pursuant to 
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.), the endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat 
(Dipodomys stephensi). This is in conjunction with-otherwise legal 
activities such as private and public development and improvement 
projects in portions of Riverside County, California, pursuant to the 
Implementation Agreement that implements the Long-Term Stephens' 
Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan.
    Notice is hereby given that on May 3, 1996, as authorized by the 
provisions of the Act, the Service issued an incidental take permit 
PRT-805414 to the above-named party subject to certain conditions set 
forth therein. The permit was granted only after it was determined that 
it was applied for in good faith, that by granting the permit it will 
not lead to the jeopardy of the endangered species, and that it will be 
consistent with the purposes and policies set forth in the Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office, 2730 Loker Avenue West, 
Carlsbad, California 92008, telephone (619) 431-9440, between the hours 
of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. weekdays.

    Dated: June 14, 1996.
Thomas Dwyer,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 96-16239 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16441]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[UT-060-06-1430-001, UTU-74116]

Notice of Realty Action; Grand County, UT

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Residential Occupancy Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 302 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2762; 43 USC 1932), the Bureau of Land 
Management, Moab District, will consider leasing a parcel of public 
land in Grand County, Utah. Leasing of the federal land will authorize 
existing residential uses and improvements, and will allow the 
government to collect fair market rental. The land and prospective 
lessee area as follows:

T. 23 S., R. 24 E. Sec 18: Lot 2 (fractional)

0 .5 acres
Salt Lake Base Meridian
Prospective Lessees: Merrel and Jan Herod
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The parcel would be offered to the present 
occupant for direct, noncompetitive lease, at no less than fair market 
rental. The size, configuration and location of the parcel limits the 
uses and users. The age and financial status of the prospective lessees 
are such that failure to issue the lease will pose significant 
financial hardship on the occupants.
    The general terms and conditions for the lease are found at 43 CFR 
2920.7. Additional terms and conditions would be added in accordance 
with mitigation stipulations identified in draft Environmental 
Assessment UT-068-95-107.
    For a period of 30 days from publication of this notice, interested 
parties may submit comments to the Moab District Manager, 82 East 
Dogwood, Moab, Utah 84532. Comments will be evaluated, and the decision 
to issue, modify or reject the lease will be made.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Jackson, Moab District Office, 82 
East Dogwood, Moab, Utah 84532, (801) 259-6111.

    Dated: June 19, 1996.
Brad D. Palmer,
(Acting) District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-16441 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WELLS FARGO ADVANTAGE NATIONAL

TAX FEE FUND, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

HELICON ASSOCIATES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 08-cv-15162

HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION (docket no. 260) AND GRANTING IN PART

MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS FEES (docket no. 250) AND COSTS (docket no. 251).

This case involved a dispute over the issuance, sale, and purchase of municipal

bonds. The parties eventually entered into a consent judgment on April 25, 2012, resolving

the underlying dispute, and awarding damages to the plaintiffs. On May 11, 2012, the

plaintiffs filed the instant motions for attorneys fees and costs. The motions were referred

to a Magistrate Judge for consideration. On October 31, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued

a Report and Recommendation ("Report"), suggesting that the plaintiffs be awarded

attorneys fees in the amount of $873,810.70, and costs in the amount of $67,905.50.

Neither the plaintiffs nor defendants filed an objection to the Report.

Civil Rule 72(b) governs review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

De novo review of the magistrate judge’s findings is only required if the parties “serve and

file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations.” Fed. R. Civ.

P. 72(b)(2). Nevertheless, because a district judge always retains jurisdiction over a motion

after referring it to a magistrate judge, he is entitled to review the magistrate judge's

findings of fact and conclusions of law on his own initiative. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.

140, 154 (1985) (clarifying that while a district court judge need not review a report and

2:08-cv-15162-SJM-MJH Doc # 261 Filed 11/20/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 9050
2

recommendation “de novo if no objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by

the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other

standard”).

Because neither the plaintiffs nor defendants filed objections, de novo review of the

Report's conclusions is not required. Having reviewed the Report's analysis, in light of the

record, the Court finds that its conclusions are factually based and legally sound.

Accordingly, it will adopt the Report's findings, and grant the motions for attorneys fees and

costs in the amount and categories specified in the Report.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Report (docket no. 260) is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for attorneys fees (docket no.

250) is GRANTED in the amount of $873,810.70.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion for costs (docket no. 251) is

GRANTED in the amount of $67,905.50.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III 

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge

Dated: November 20, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on November 20, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-15162-SJM-MJH Doc # 261 Filed 11/20/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 9051
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16072]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-570-000]


Questar Pipeline Company; Notice of Request under Blanket 
Authorization

June 19, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 13, 1996, Questar Pipeline Company 
(Questar), 79 South State Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 filed in 
the above docket, a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization to 
construct and operate a new delivery point located adjacent to 
Questar's jurisdictional Lateral (J.L.) No. 4 in Uinta County, Wyoming. 
Questar states that its request was made under its blanket certificate 
authorization issued in Docket No. CP82-491-000 pursuant to Section 
7(c) of the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, Questar states that the facilities proposed to be 
constructed will be utilized to initiate interruptible natural gas 
transportation service to Universal Resources Corporation (URC), and 
affiliate of Questar. The additional delivery point, it is stated, is 
required to effectuate the transportation of natural gas to URC under 
Questar's interruptible transportation Rate Schedule T-2 which is 
included in First Revised Volume No. 1 of Questar's currently effective 
FERC Gas Tariff.
    Questar proposes to construct and operate a new delivery point to 
be designated the Clear Creek District Regulator Station (DRS). Questar 
states that the Clear Creek DRS will comprise approximately two feet of 
four-inch piping, two four-inch valves, one four-inch meter run and 
appurtenant facilities. It is explained that the total investment 
associated with the facilities propose to be constructed is $33000 and 
that all construction activities will take place above ground and 
within Questar's existing authorized 100 by 150-foot graveled and 
graded Clear Creek receipt-point site.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request.
    If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity is deemed to be authorized effective on the day after 
the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not 
withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16072 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     I, Charles A. Lingenfelter, Chief Executive Officer of the Industrial Distribution Group, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual periodended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.Dated: March 3, 2006   /s/ Charles A. LingenfelterCharles A. LingenfelterPresident andChief Executive Officer
#### Ronald Ray and Vicki Lynn JONES, Appellant, v. Marion BRAND, Sam Brand, Mildred Brand, Respondents.

No. WD 49680.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

July 25, 1995.

Joyce M. Capshaw, St. Louis, for appellant.

David A. Oliver, Columbia, for respondent Marion Brand.

Louis J. Leonatti, Mexico, for respondent Sam Brand.

Lawrence W. Ferguson, Columbia, for respondent Mildred Brand.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and SMART and LAURA DENVER STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Ronald and Vicki Jones appeal the judgments entered in the trial court with regard to their claims arising out of a vehicular mishap occurring on Highway E in Randolph County. Plaintiff Ronald Jones sustained injuries when he swerved to avoid a collision with equipment operated by Marion Brand, and lost control of his vehicle.

Ronald and Vicki Lynn Jones sued Marion Brand, Sam Brand, and Mildred Brand. They contended that Marion Brand was negligent, and that Sam Brand and Mildred Brand were vicariously liable as partners with Marion Brand. The trial court granted summary judgment as to Mildred Brand. After a trial, the jury found no party at fault. Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal the grant of summary judgment as to Mildred Brand. Mr. and Mrs. Jones also appeal an evidentia-ry ruling of the trial court and contend that the court erred in failing to grant a mistrial due to an improper closing argument of counsel.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 32.02    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of POWRtec International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Simon Westbrook, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Simon Westbrook By: Simon Westbrook Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 15, 2014  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Revocation of License of Specialized Small Business Investment 
Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Order of the United States District 
Court for the Southern District of New York, dated October 27, 1992, 
the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the 
license of Watchung Capital Corporation, a New York Corporation, to 
function as a specialized small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 02/02-5371 issued to 
Watchung Capital Corporation on February 19, 1980 and said license is 
hereby declared null and void as of March 14, 1996.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 96-16423 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P