alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                                                                       Exhibit I

                  Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                      with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards


March 29, 2002


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc. (the "Company"), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc., has complied
in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").


As of and for this same period, CIT Group Inc. had in effect a financial
institution bond and computer crime policy, excess crime policy and errors and
omissions policy in the amounts of $60mm, $120mm and $25mm, respectively.




/s/ Thomas B. Hallman
-----------------------------------------
Thomas B. Hallman
President & Chief Executive Officer
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.


<PAGE>


/s/ Kenneth P. Reynolds
-----------------------------------------
Kenneth P. Reynolds
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Controller
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.


/s/ Frank Garcia
-----------------------------------------
Frank Garcia
Senior Vice President
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bryan SLATER, Appellant.

No. WD 46717.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 25, 1993.

Mark C. Evans, Jefferson City, for appellant.

Richard C. Callahan, Pros. Atty., Robert W. Russell, Asst. Pros. Atty., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and BERREY and ULRICH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from his conviction of third degree assault, section 565.070, RSMo 1986, a class A misdemeanor. He alleges the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31140-31141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15219]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Jobs Opportunity Basic Skills (JOBS) Participation Rate 
Quarterly Report.
    OMB No.: 0970-0098.
    Description: The information received from this collection will 
provide ACF the information to determine if each State has met the 
required JOBS participation rates and adjust the FFP rate accordingly. 
States must establish that the specified percentage of those required 
to participate in the JOBS program actually participate. The routine 
collection participation rate data also provides ACF with sufficient 
information to adequately respond to inquiries from Congress and other 
interested parties regarding nationwide JOBS participation rates.
    Respondents: State governments.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Number of      Average burden                 
                 Instrument                      Number of      responses per      hours per       Total burden 
                                                respondents       respondent        response          hours     
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACF-103.....................................              54                4               12            2,592 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,592.                                                                     

    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to The Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Information Services, Division of Information Resource 
Management Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, 
Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer.
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
NW.,

[[Page 31141]]

Washington, DC 20503, Attn: Ms. Wendy Taylor.

    Dated: June 10, 1996.
Larry Guerrero,
Acting Director, Office of Information Resource Management Services.
[FR Doc. 96-15219 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DANIEL ESTEBAN SOTO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2815 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) )

Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed July 12, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Gary R. Gossett, Jr., Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
The Hon. John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District o f 1 Minnesota, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-2113SI

_____________ Marlene E. Dohrn, * * Appellant, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the Southern District * of Iowa. * Circle B. Cashway, Inc., * [Not to be Published.] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 1999 Filed: January 25, 1999

___________ Be fore RICHARD S. ARNOLD and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM. This is a Title VII case. The plaintiff, Marlene E. Dohrn, claims that th e defen dant, Circle B. Cashway, Inc., fired her on account of her sex. The defendan t de nies this, and states that Ms. Dohrn was in fact discharged because she had shown herself disloyal to the company by looking for another job in secret. The DistrictThe Hon. Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern 2 District of Iowa. -2- Cou rt granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissed th e 2 complaint. Having now had the benefit of briefs and oral argument, we affirm. Inour view, plaintiff has not produced enough evidence of pretext to surviv e summary judgment. She claims that other employees — men — who had looked for work elsewhere were not fired, but her evidence of this is hearsay, based not upon her own perso nal knowledge but upon what others told her. There is evidence of sexis t rema rks made by persons in authority with the employer, but no such remarks wer e madeby the person who made the decision to fire the plaintiff. The evidence here is simplynot substantial enough to justify a jury verdict in plaintiff's favor, and it wa s therefore proper for the District Court to grant summary judgment for the defendant. The cas e is not of sufficient precedential significance to justify a fulle r discussi on, and we therefore confine ourselves, in the interest of expedition, to thi s abbreviated opinion. Affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| 1.  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company      as of and for the period covered by thisReport. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      12, 2009 |  By:                                               | /s/ Robert J. Stroh, Jr. |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                   | Robert      J. Stroh, Jr.                                         |
|                   | Chairman,      Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE 175TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on September 9, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Angel H. Longoria, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-15-00263-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CR5599A

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, these appeals are

DISMISSED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 9, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 725

- CV

IN RE Rodney CABRERA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 26, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On September 30, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled

to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CU RIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009

- CI

- 01925, styled In the Interest of C.L.C., et al. , in the 150th

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding. However, the rulings

complained of were made by the Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, presiding judge of the 45th Judicial District

Court, Bexar County, Texas.
#### Pickering SHEARBURN, Petitioner-Respondent, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 55985.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

June 20, 1989.

*867William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Van M. Pounds, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent-appellant.

Timothy F. Devereux, Clayton, for petitioner-respondent.

REINHARD, Judge.

Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court’s judgment reinstating petitioner’s driver’s license after trial de novo. We reverse and remand.

The facts in this case, insofar as they affect our resolution of the issue on appeal, are generally the same as in *Walsh v. Director of Revenue,*772 S.W.2d 865 (Mo.App.1989). The points relied on are identical to those in *Walsh.*

For the reasons stated in *Walsh,*the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions to set aside the order reinstating petitioner’s driver’s license and to sustain Director’s application for change of judge.

Reversed and remanded.

CRANDALL, P.J., and CRIST, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of 
Veterans Affairs, has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) the following proposal for the collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0118.
    Title and Form Number: Veterans Benefits, Veterans Education, 
Education or Training, VA Form Letter 22-315
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Need and Uses: The information is used to determine whether a 
claimant is eligible for payment for training at an institution other 
than the institution which will grant a degree or certificate upon 
completion of training. Without the information, benefits cannot be 
authorized for any courses pursued at other than the primary 
institution.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households, Business or other for-
profit, Not-for-profit institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 207 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden Per Respondent: 7\1/2\ minutes per 
application.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,244.

ADDRESSES: A copy of this submission may be obtained from Ron Taylor, 
VA Clearance Officer (045A4), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015.
    Comments and recommendations concerning the submission should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. DO NOT send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer by no later than August 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Taylor, VA Clearance Officer 
(045A4), (202) 273-8015.

    Dated: June 24, 1996.
    By direction of the Secretary.
William T. Morgan,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 96-16786 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Capital City
Energy Group, Inc. do hereby certify that:







(a)
            The
      Form 10-Q/A of Capital City Energy Group, Inc. for the period ended March
      31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(b)
            Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Capital City Energy
      Group, Inc.








Dated:  September
8,
2008                                                                                   /s/ Timothy W.
Crawford


Timothy W. Crawford


Chief Executive Officer








Dated:  September
8,
2008                                                                                   /s/ David
Beule


David Beule


Chief Financial
Officer
#### Patrick DICKENS and Alice Dickens, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 64602.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Dec. 6, 1994.

Michael A. Gross, Burton W. Newman, St. Louis, for appellants.

Kenneth C. Brostron, Wendy J. Wolf, Lashly & Baer, P.C., St. Louis, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and SIMON and KAROHL, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In this wrongful death action pursuant to § 537.080, plaintiffs, parents of John Dickens, appeal the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury verdict, in favor of defendant. Specifically, plaintiffs appeal the denial of their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consentof Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-96467)pertaining to the 1988 Stock Option Plan and the 1997 Share Incentive Plan ofIOMED, Inc. of our report dated August 5, 2005, except for paragraph 5of Note 11, as to which the date is August 31, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of IOMED, Inc. included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2005.

 
|   |   |  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|

 

Salt Lake City, Utah

September 22, 2005

 

1

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1345 KA 12-00046 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT

V ORDER
VALFANSO DEWITT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAMS, HEINL, MOODY & BUSCHMAN, P.C., AUBURN (MARIO J. GUTIERREZ OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (NATHAN J. GARLAND OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G. Leone, J.), entered November 10, 2011. The order denied the motion of defendant for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Acts of 2004, 2005 and 2009. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: December 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 2 of 8
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 3 of 8
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 5 of 8
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 219-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 8 of 8
Dockets.Justia.com
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16954]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-27; RM-8750]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Pullman, WA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Keith E. Lamonica, allots 
Channel 249A at Pullman, Washington, as the community's third local 
commercial FM transmission service See 61 FR 9410, March 8, 1996. 
Channel 249A can be allotted to Pullman in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 8.8 kilometers (5.5 miles) east to avoid a short-spacing 
to the construction permit site of Station WLKY(FM), Channel 250C1, 
Milton-Freewater, Oregon, and to the licensed site of Station KISC(FM), 
Channel 251C, Spokane, Washington. The coordinates for Channel 249A at 
Pullman are North Latitude 46-44-37 and West Longitude 117-03-34. Since 
Pullman is located within 320 kilometers (200 miles) of the U.S.-
Canadian border, concurrence of the Canadian government has been 
obtained. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective August 12, 1996. The window period for filing 
applications will open on August 12, 1996, and close on September 12, 
1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 95-27, adopted June 21, 1996, and 
released June 28, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sections 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 
154, as amended.


Sec. 973.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Washington, 
is amended by adding Channel 249A at Pullman.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-16954 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
#### William Earl WEIR, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 40278.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 29, 1988.

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, C.J., and BERREY and COVINGTON, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from denial, after evidentiary hearing, of Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 84.-16(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference, in Interwoven, Inc.'s
registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-88725, 333-39914, 333-42690,
333-46662, 333-49926 and 333-54250), of our report dated January 18, 2001
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules, which
are incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                          /s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San Jose, California
March 21, 2002
Exhibit 10.1


 


Description of 2009 Cash Bonus Arrangements for Named
Executive Officers


 


	
  ·

  	
  Each named executive will be entitled to receive a cash bonus for
  2009 equal to a target percentage of that executive’s base salary.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ·

  	
  The maximum bonus for our chief executive officer will be 120% of his
  base salary.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  ·

  	
  The maximum bonus for our chief financial officer will be 100% of his
  base salary.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·

  	
  One half of the bonus will be based upon the Company’s overall
  financial performance, as measured by the Company’s fully diluted earnings
  per share for fiscal year 2009.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·

  	
  One half of the bonus will be based upon each executive’s individual
  performance, as measured by factors the Compensation Committee may deem
  appropriate.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  ·

  	
  The overall maximum bonus percentages also may be increased or
  reduced based on the Company’s financial performance.