alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of BBN Global Consulting, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. S. Craig Barton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: June 18, 2007  /s/Dr. S. Craig Barton Dr. S. Craig Barton Title: President
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID R. GELINAS; KAREN M.

GELINAS,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

U.S. BANK, as Trustee for LSF9 Master

Participation Trust; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 17

- 35292

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 01468

- JLR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 201 8 **

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

David R. Gelinas and Karen M. Gelinas appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing for failure to file an amended complaint their action

alleging federal and state law claims arising from a pending foreclosure. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 23 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35292

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion

. Al

Torki v. Kaempen , 78 F.3d 1381, 1384 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.

In the opening brief, plaintiffs fail to address how the district court erred in

dismissing their actio n for failure to prosecute

. As a result, plaintiffs have waived

their challenge to the district court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045,

1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening

brief are deemed waived.” ); Greenwood v. FAA , 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994)

(“We review only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s

opening brief.”).

AFFIRMED.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-40098 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. SAMUEL ADAN CASTILLO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-547-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing t he judgment in a crimin a l c a s e , S a m u e l A d a n Castillo-Ramirez raises an a rgument that he concedes is f oreclosed b y U

n ited States v. Newson, 515 F.3d 374, 3 78-79 ( 5th Cir. 2008), which held that t h e Government m ay decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3 E1.1(b) based on the defendant’s ref usal to waive his right to appeal. The appellant’s motion f or summary disposition i s GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Aug ust 20, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-40098 Document: 00512347328 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-280-000]


Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

June 20, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 18, 1996, Tuscarora Gas Transmission 
Company (Tuscarora) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
August 1, 1996:

First Revised Sheet Nos. 4 & 5
First Revised Sheet No. 31
Original Sheet Nos. 91-93.

    Tuscarora states that the tariff sheets which it is submitting 
reflect a Gas Research Institute Adjustment Provision.
    Tuscarora further states it has served a copy of this filing upon 
all interested state regulatory agencies and Tuscarora's jurisdictional 
customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be filed 
as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become party must file 
a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16352 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### Eon. 3111 Crow, Pago 2 “1. A odsaion of me-half of one paraent u p on o h 0 l 

### oliumlaaahreoeiptb 0r eeo& exeauOcw, ettmlnleiirator 

### or guaxllui, upon 

### the approval of t he l x h i b l8s~a nU



### thr flzml @o88lemat OS the #MJaouat or 

### suoh emouter, mlmlalstxator or guardian, butnomoratbnonna 

### web 0olmds8l0naha11be aharged 

### 011

nay aooaunt 

### rewired **by** 

### any suah axaoutor, 

### adndaletrator QT 

### guortllan. * . . . .- Art.1010 

### 3926, Yapmats Annote ted Clrll stntubeu embraaoa 

### fire 8oationh 

### nlth Eeotlon 1. We are aonoqrnadhere prlaalpally



### In the aa of Igles v. Oheim, l&2 3. r, 959, 00Mtrtllng

ArtlOl@ 3926, 

# it ii5 mid,

: ): ‘<S:,, I::,+.. y :: :~. .;

### BBnonble Will Czaw, Pege 3

I .’ ., ..,. :

,, ,:: ,..,.:_.

:c.,:-: !.:, : >>i.,

:;‘.:!: ,~:.:. .~ ‘.

. ,. .. :
#### James H. HUDDLESTON, Respondent, v. Kathy Sue HUDDLESTON, Appellant.

No. 62033.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 20, 1993.

Byron Cohen, Clayton, for appellant.

James H. Huddleston, pro se.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals the dissolution decree granting Father custody of the child of the marriage. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

We also determine an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm by written order. A memorandum for the parties’ use only has been prepared.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Douglas E. Ford, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sawadee Ventures,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
30th day of July, 2007.


/s/ Douglas E. Ford
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.3



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RCN Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David C. McCourt, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David C.
McCourt

David C. McCourt

April 29, 2004



This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to RCN Corporation
and will be retained by RCN Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Jeff
    Clarke
   Chief Executive Officer
   Philip
    Emery
   Chief Financial Officer
  41
#### CITY OF KANSAS CITY, Missouri, Respondent, v. Frankie MORRIS, Appellant.

No. WD 52061.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 27, 1996.

David A. Reed, Kansas City, for appellant.

George L. Sharp, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before ELLIS, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Frankie Moms appeals from his conviction of Obstructing/Resisting a Law Enforcement Officer in violation of a Kansas City, Missouri Municipal Ordinance.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 5



Michael R. Scott .
Private Investigator | nvo | ce

PO Box 852 Number: 2027
Lake Orion, MI 48361
Date: May 19, 2010

Bill To:

David A. Robinson, Esq.
28145 Greenfield Rd Suite 100
Southfield, MI 48076

RE:

Bernadine Tuitt

Date Description Hours Rate Amount
2/19/10 Field-Lathrup Village 2.00 60.00 120.00
2/19/10 Mileage 55.00 0.60 33.00
3/6/10 Field-Lathrup Village 2.00 60.00 4120.00
3/6/10 Mileage 62.00 0.60 37.20
4/21/10 Field-Bloomfield Hills, Southfield 6.00 60.00 360.00
4121110 Mileage 55.00 0.60 33.00
4/27/10 Field-Oak Park 2.50 60.00 150.00
4/27/10 Mileage 57.00 0.60 34.20
4/28/10 Field-Carlos Tuitt subpoena 3.00 60.00 480.00
4/28/10 Mileage 55.00 0.60 33.00
5HNO field Troy, Ira Hill 4.50 60.00 90.00
5/110 Mileage 32.00 0.60 19.20
5/3/10 Field-Dearborn, Detroit, subpoena Gwen Wright Bloomfield 5.75 60.00 345.00
5/2/10 Mileage 102.00 0.60 61.20

PAID Total $1,615.80

ho A Ie are

_
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Nichols, certify that:

1

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sun American Bancorp;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)

Intentionally omitted.

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants control over financial reporting.





Date: March 28, 2007



/s/ ROBERT NICHOLS

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1


                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rod A. Shipman, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CPC of America,
Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the company and I have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this reported my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period
covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

         5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit
committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control
over financial reporting.



March 31, 2005                           /s/  Rod A. Shipman
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Rod A. Shipman, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34784-34785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16767]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 95-119; RM-8667]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Dafter, MI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document dismisses a petition filed by Dafter Community 
Broadcasters proposing the allotment of Channel 293A to Dafter, 
Michigan. See FR 38539, July 27, 1995. Petitioner failed to provide 
sufficient information to establish community status for Dafter. 
Therefore, in keeping with Commission policy to refrain from allotting 
channels to communities lacking community status, we have dismissed the 
petiton for Dafter. With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 95-119, adopted May 8, 1996, and released June 
21, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's 
Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-
3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.


[[Page 34785]]


Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-16767 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F