alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                   SECTION 302
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Dejan Mirkovic, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Shopper's Wallet,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, the results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: May 4, 2007                By /s/ Dejan Mirkovic
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Dejan Mirkovic,
                                   Principal Financial Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOE HARRELL,

Plaintiff, Case No. 09-CV-10132

Paul D. Borman

v. United States District Judge

Mona K. Majzoub

United States Magistrate Judge

JENKINS, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING DEFENDANTS NAKARTA AND MARTIN AND

DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub’s November 24, 2010 Report and

Recommendation dismissing Defendants Nakarta and Martin and dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint

for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). (Dkt. No. 49.)

 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections

from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, DISMISSES Defendants Nakarta and Martin and

DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 18, 2011

2:09-cv-10132-PDB-MKM Doc # 50 Filed 01/18/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 254
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on

January 18, 2011.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10132-PDB-MKM Doc # 50 Filed 01/18/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 255
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

MITCHAM INDUSTRIES, INC. 

SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 

(AS OF JULY 31, 2013) 

Retainer/Fees 
 Each non-employee director
is entitled to receive the following compensation: 
  

	 	•	 	an annual cash retainer fee of $35,000 per year, plus an additional $60,000 for the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors; 


 

	 	•	 	an additional cash retainer of $7,500 per year for each member of the Audit Committee, plus an additional $5,000 per year for the chairperson of the Audit Committee;


 

	 	•	 	an additional cash retainer of $4,000 per year for each member of the Compensation Committee, plus an additional $4,000 per year for the chairperson of the Compensation Committee; 


 

	 	•	 	an additional fee of $2,000 for each Board of Directors meeting attended, including telephonic meetings. 


Equity-Based Compensation 
 In addition to
cash compensation, non-employee directors are eligible, at the discretion of the full Board of Directors, to receive discretionary grants of stock options or restricted stock or any combination thereof under Mitcham Industries, Inc.’s equity
compensation plans.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1605]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Voyageurs National Park, MN; Historic Resort Hotel and Villas 
Operations

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service 
proposes to award a concession contract authorizing continued operation 
of historic resort hotel and villas, with food service, boat portaging, 
and water-related services for the public at Voyageurs National Park, 
Minnesota, for a period of approximately ten (10) years from January 1, 
1996, through December 31, 2005.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties should contact the Superintendent, 
Voyageurs National Park, 3131 Highway 53 South, International Falls, 
Minnesota 56649, to obtain a copy of the prospectus describing the 
requirements of the proposed contract.

SUPPLEMENARY INFORMATION: This contract renewal has been determined to 
be categorically excluded from the procedural provisions of the 
National Environmental Policy Act and no environmental document will be 
prepared. There was an existing concessioner for this operation under a 
previous contract which expired on October 8, 1995, but that 
concessioner is not entitled to a right of preference in the 
negotiation of the new contract. This means that the contract will be 
awarded to the party submitting the best offer.
    The Secretary will consider and evaluate all proposals received as 
a result of this notice. All proposals must be received by the 
Superintendent not later than the sixtieth (60) day following 
publication of this notice to be considered and evaluated.

    Dated: December 12, 1995.
William W. Schenk,
Field Director, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 96-1605 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Firstway Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Tay, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ William Tay

By: William Tay

Title: Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director



Dated: November 14, 2007
Exhibit 10.5 -- Second Amendment to Retirement Benefit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO RETIREMENT BENEFIT AGREEMENT 
 This Second Amendment, dated as of
December 11, 2008, amends the Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of March 4, 1998 between General Dynamics Corporation (the “Corporation”) and David A. Savner (“the Executive”), as amended by the Amendment to
Retirement Benefit Agreement dated as of June 7, 2007 (together the “Agreement”). 
 The Agreement is hereby amended to insert
a new Section 12 as follows: 
 Section 12. SECTION 409A. The intent of the parties is that payments and benefits under this
Agreement comply with Section 409A of the Code to the extent subject thereto, and, accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted, this Agreement shall be interpreted and administered to be in compliance therewith. Notwithstanding anything
contained herein to the contrary, the Executive shall not be considered to have terminated employment with the Corporation for purposes of this Agreement until the Executive would be considered to have incurred a “separation from service”
from the Corporation within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Second Amendment to the
Retirement Benefit Agreement to be executed, and the Executive has executed this Second Amendment to the Retirement Benefit Agreement as of the date first above written. 
  

							
		 		 	GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION
				
	 /s/ Millie A. Miller
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Walter M. Oliver

	Witness	 		 		 	Walter M. Oliver, Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Administration
				
	 /s/ Julie P. Aslaksen
	 		 		 	 /s/ David A. Savner

	Witness	 		 		 	David A. Savner
EX-10.12



 Exhibit 10.12 

This is a translation of the original Chinese text. 

January 17, 2014 
 To: Beijing Kingsoft Network Technology
Co., Ltd. (the “VIE Entity”) 
 To Whom It May Concern: 

To ensure the cash flow requirements of the VIE entity’s operations are met and/or to set off any loss accrued during such operations, the undersigned,
Conew Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”), is obligated and hereby undertakes to provide unlimited financial support to the VIE Entity, to the extent permissible under the applicable PRC laws and regulations, whether
or not any such operational loss is actually incurred. The form of financial support shall include, but not limited to, extension of cash, entrusted loans and borrowings. WFOE will not request repayment of the loans or borrowings if the VIE Entity
or its shareholders do not have sufficient funds or are unable to repay. 
 The undersigned agrees and acknowledges such undertaking shall be irrevocable
and continuously valid from June 20, 2012 until the earlier of (1) the date on which all of the equity interests of the VIE Entity have been acquired directly or indirectly by WFOE or its designated representative (individual or legal
person); or (2) the date of unilateral termination by WFOE, at its sole and absolution discretion, by giving thirty (30) days prior written notice to the VIE Entity of its intention to terminate this letter. 

Please confirm receipt of this letter by returning a signed copy of this letter to the undersigned. 

 

			
	Conew Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
		
	By/Chop:	 	/s/ Common seal of Conew Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. James L. JENKINS, Appellant.

No. WD 47722.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 8, 1994.

Lawrence R. McClure, Marshall, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and ULRICH and SPINDEN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James L. Jenkins appeals his convictions of first degree assault and armed criminal action. We affirm the judgment. Rule 30.-25(b).
Exhibit
13.2




CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of China Southern Airlines Company Limited
(the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Xu Jie Bo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      December 8, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Xu Jie BoName:
      Xu Jie BoTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer




* This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 995 

Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives all information in the possession of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relating to nutrient management of the 

Illinois River Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2009 

Mr. BOOZMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President to transmit to the House 

of Representatives all information in the possession of 

the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency relating to nutrient management of the Illinois River 

Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests 

2 the President to transmit to the House of Representatives, 

3 not later than 30 days after the date of adoption of this 

4 resolution, copies of all documents, including unredacted 

5 hard copies and electronic documents, in the possession 

6 of the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 995 IH 

1 Agency relating to nutrient management of the Illinois 

2 River Watershed, Arkansas and Oklahoma. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
1


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN,
Plaintiff,
Case No, 08-CV-14922
v. Hon. Patrick J. Duggan

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendant.
Chris E. Davis (P52159) BUTZEL LONG
Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc. By: Robert A. Boonin (P38172)
29200 Vassar Blvd., Suite 200 350 S. Main Street, Suite 300
Livonia, MI 48152 Ann Arbor, MI 48104
(248) 473-2990 (734) 995-3110
Attorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant

boonin@butzel.com

AFFIDAVIT OF THERESA M. ROWE

STATE OF MICHIGAN ) :
) ss L
COUNTY OF OAKLAND ) :

I, Theresa M. Rowe, state under oath that the following is true:

1. T have personal knowledge of the facts in this Affidavit and, if sworn as a witness in
this matter, I can competently testify to the facts stated herein.

2. Iam currently employed by Oakland University as its Chief Information Officer. In
that capacity, I am responsible for oversight of the university’s technology services, including the
enterprise resource planning system known as “Banner” which is used in part to house many

different types of data.

3. The Banner database includes but is not limited to contact and other information
related to university students, vendors, employees, donors, and undergraduate and graduate
applicants,



4. Banner automatically and randomly assigns a “G-number”, a unique numeric
identifier, to all contacts within the database including all university vendors, employees,
applicants, and donors have a “G-number,”

Further affiant saith not.

Bho van te oue-

Theresa M. Rowe, Chief Information Officer
Oakland University

STATE OF MICHIGAN __)
)ss
COUNTY OF OAKLAND )

2009,

) The signator is known to me and acknowledged the foregoing instrument this __/ (Fi day of_

NEN Susi nqouy, Notar
Oakland County, Michigan
My Commission expires:
Jonnifer L. Swial
oni ae
inty, Michigan
My Commission Expies: 10-11-15
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1207

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
  feasibility of designating the National D-Day Memorial in Bedford, 
            Virginia, as a unit of the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2009

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
  feasibility of designating the National D-Day Memorial in Bedford, 
            Virginia, as a unit of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL STUDY.

    (a) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Area.--The term ``Area'' means in the National D-Day 
        Memorial in Bedford, Virginia.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National 
        Park Service.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
        Area to evaluate the national significance of the Area and 
        suitability and feasibility of designating the Area as a unit 
        of the National Park System.
            (2) Criteria.--In conducting the study required by 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall use the criteria for the 
        study of areas for potential inclusion in the National Park 
        System in section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-
        5(c)).
            (3) Contents.--The study required by paragraph (1) shall--
                    (A) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
                designating the Area as a unit of the National Park 
                System;
                    (B) include cost estimates for any necessary 
                acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of 
                the Area; and
                    (C) identify alternatives for the management, 
                administration, and protection of the Area.
    (c) Report.--Section 8(c) of Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) 
shall apply to the conduct of the study required by this section, 
except that the study shall be submitted to the Committee on Natural 
Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy 
and Natural Resources of the Senate not later than 3 years after the 
date on which funds are first made available for the study.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**MING WEI,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**STATE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION (DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH),** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 848 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this m atter.**
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael E. Healy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.



|                         |  |  |  |        |  |                                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 10, 2008 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICHAEL E. HEALY                                             
|                         |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Healy                                                    
|                         |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer)
#### Geary RUSHTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 1260-85.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

March 18, 1987.

*956On appellant’s petition for discretionary review: petition dismissed as improvidently granted.

CLINTON, J., dissents.