alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 994 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 153
111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 994

                          [Report No. 111-404]

      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the decision to dismiss United States v. New Black Panther 
                                 Party.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

Mr. Wolf submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                            January 27, 2010

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, referred to the 
               House Calendar, and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the decision to dismiss United States v. New Black Panther 
                                 Party.

    Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to transmit to the 
House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of 
adoption of this resolution, copies of any document, memo, or 
correspondence of the Department of Justice with regard to United 
States v. New Black Panther Party, or any portion of any such document, 
memo, or correspondence that refers or relates to--
            (1) any department communications with regard to the case 
        between November 5, 2008, and November 15, 2009;
            (2) any communication with the defendants or the 
        defendants' attorneys between November 5, 2008, and November 
        15, 2009;
            (3) any communication with third-party organizations or 
        individuals between November 5, 2008, and November 15, 2009; or
            (4) any evidence with regard to the dismissal of the case.
                                                 House Calendar No. 153

111th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 994

                          [Report No. 111-404]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the decision to dismiss United States v. New Black Panther 
                                 Party.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 27, 2010

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, referred to the 
               House Calendar, and ordered to be printed
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16309]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Tennessee Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Tennessee Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and recess at 11:00 a.m. on Wednesday, July 10, 1996, at the 
Ramada Hotel, 160 Union Street in Memphis, Tennessee 38103. The purpose 
of the meeting is to hold a press conference to release the report, 
Racial Tensions in Tennessee. The meeting is open to the public. The 
meeting will reconvene at 1:00 p.m. and adjourn at 5:00 p.m. to hear 
from invited guests, including the governor, State representatives, 
mayors, police and fire chiefs, religious communities involved, and the 
civil rights community on the recent rash of church burnings in the 
South, with an emphasis on Tennessee churches.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Jocelyn 
Wurzburg, 901-684-1332, or Bobby D. Doctor, Director of the Southern 
Regional Office, 404-730-2476 (TDD 404-730-2481). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five 
(5) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, June 20, 1996.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 96-16309 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Joseph Gibbone, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Consolidated Edison Co. Of New York, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered June 17, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover for damage to the sewer pipe on his property allegedly caused by defendant's negligence. Following a nonjury trial, the Civil Court found in favor of defendant and dismissed the action.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>see</i> CCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126).</p><p>Here, plaintiff failed to prove that the damage to his sewer pipe was caused by any work that had been performed by defendant. Even in a small claims action, a plaintiff is required to produce an expert to prove causation when it is not apparent to a non-expert observer (<a href="../2014/2014_51668.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Milliner v Shahar</i>, 45 Misc 3d 133</a>[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51668[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2014]; <a href="../2003/2003_23971.htm" target="_blank"><i>Murov v Celentano</i>, 3 Misc 3d 1</a> [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th &amp; 10th Jud Dists 2003]). Plaintiff presented no expert testimony in support of his claim that the work that had been performed by defendant contributed to his sewer pipe damage.</p><p>Plaintiff's remaining contentions lack merit.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>Weston, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: March 18, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

CR-18-422-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the United States’ Unopposed Motion to Extend 

Deadline to File Responses to Defendants’ Post-Trial Motions [Docs. 2004, 2006, 2007, 

2009], and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the United States’ Unopposed Motion to Extend 

Deadline to File Responses to Defendants’ Post-Trial Motions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the deadline for the United States to file 

responses to Docs. 2004, 2006, 2007, and 2009 until and including December 22, 2023. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2015-1 Filed 12/13/23 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS CERTIFICATION 
REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 906 OF 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Sun American Bancorp (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael Golden, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2006

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAELE. GOLDEN                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1443-1   Filed 12/28/21   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 1443-1   Filed 12/28/21   Page 2 of 2

- FerrerSubpoenaPg1 (1)
- FerrerSubpoenaPg2 (2)
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23 


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
PMA Capital Corporation on Form S-3(File No. 333-63469) and on Form S-8(File No.
333-45949 and File No. 333-68855) of our reports dated February 5, 1999, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedules of PMA Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which reports are included or
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
March 26, 1999
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss or to Strike Testimony, and Request for 

a Hearing Due to the Government’s Jencks and Brady Violations (Doc. 1967). The 

Government has filed a Response (Doc. 1966). The Court finds cause to grant Defendants’

request for a hearing on the Motion. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED setting an Evidentiary Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss or to Strike Testimony, and Request for a Hearing Due to the Government’s Jencks

and Brady Violations (Doc. 1967) for November 14, 2023, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 

605, Sandra Day O’Connor United States Courthouse, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, 

Arizona 85003.

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that parties shall deliver one (1) original and two 

(2) copies of the witness and exhibit lists, using the forms located on the Court’s website 

at http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/judges/judges-orders, to the Courtroom Deputy no later 

than November 14, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. Each party shall also submit a list of numbered 
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

exhibits with a concise description of each exhibit. 

Dated this 13th day of November, 2023.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JULIE DICKERSON,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 08-CV-15227 

vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA,

LOCAL 223,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (# 14)

Plaintiff Julie Dickerson, appearing pro se, moves for leave to file a First Amended

Complaint. Dickerson's December 19, 2008 Complaint does not allege specific counts, but

generally alleges that defendant Utility Workers Union of America, Local 223 ("Union")

refused to pursue Dickerson's employment grievance through arbitration as provided for

in a collective bargaining agreement ("CBA"). Dickerson alleges in the Complaint that

Union breached its duty of fair representation and "violated the United States Law."

Complaint, ¶ 10, at 2. Dickerson's proposed First Amended Complaint alleges two

separate Counts against Union: breach of the CBA and breach of the Union's duty of fair

representation. Defendant Union has not opposed the motion. Leave to amend a

complaint is to be freely granted when justice so requires. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).

Absent opposition to the motion,

Plaintiff Dickerson's motion for leave to file an amended complaint is hereby

2:08-cv-15227-GCS-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 07/13/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 62
2

GRANTED. In granting Dickerson's motion, the court makes no ruling as to the merits of

the amended claims.

 SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2009

s/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

July 13, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk

2:08-cv-15227-GCS-RSW Doc # 16 Filed 07/13/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 63
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Sunshine Act Meetings]
[Page 2868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1733]








FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD

``Federal Register'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 61 FR 1256, 
January 18, 1996.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 12 p.m., January 23, 
1996.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The following topic was withdrawn from the open 
portion of the meeting:

    <bullet> Appointment of Federal Home Loan Bank Vice Chairs.

    The following topics were added to the open portion of the meeting:

    <bullet> Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines' First-time 
Homebuyer Set-Aside; and
    <bullet> Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Request for 
Exception to the Financial Management Policy.

    The Board determined that agency business required its 
consideration of these matters on less than seven days notice to the 
public and that no earlier notice of these changes in the subject 
matter of the meeting was possible.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elaine L. Baker, Secretary to the 
Board, (202) 408-2837.
Rita I. Fair,

Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 96-1733 Filed 1-25-96; 3:06 pm]

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

[Letterhead of PricewaterhouseCoopers]
                                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

                                                    1177 Avenue of the Americas
                                                    New York NY 10036
                                                    Telephone (646) 471 4000
                                                    Facsimile (646) 471 4100


                        Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder
of CIT Group Inc.


We have examined management's assertion about The CIT Group/Sales Financing,
Inc.'s (the "Company's"), a wholly owned subsidiary of CIT Group Inc.,
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, as included in the
accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit I) for Chase Manhattan RV Owner
Trust 1997-A and Chase Manhattan Marine Owner Trust 1997-A. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, NY
March 26, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America

Plaintiff,

v.

Andrew Padilla,

Defendant.

CR-18-00422-06-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

Upon motion of Defendant and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant Andrew Padilla’s motion to appear by telephone

at the hearing in this case set for August 4, 2023 at 1:00 pm (Doc. ). Instructions will be

provided for his remote appearance by separate e-mail notification. 

Dated this day of August, 2023.

 

 Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

 United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1663-1 Filed 08/03/23 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51160 Summary Calendar

BONIFACIO JUAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MAURICE NEWCOMB, Captain; DAYTON POPPELL, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CV-931

-------------------- November 3, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Bonifacio Juarez, Texas prisoner # 722475, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit as frivolous. Juarez argues that there were constitutional violations with respect to prison disciplinary hearings which ultimately resulted in the loss of 45 days of recreational and commissary privileges, as well as a period of time of solitary confinement and a change in his custody classification status. Our review of the record reveals that there was some evidence supporting the hearing officer’s disciplinary decisionsNo. 98-51160 -2-

that Juarez participated in the assault of another prisoner; that Juarez has failed to show that there were any procedural errors with the disciplinary proceedings after the first one, which was vacated in Juarez’s administrative appeal; and that Juarez’s ultimate punishment did not involve the loss of good-time credit. Juarez has failed to show that he was deprived of a constitutional right. See Gibbs v. King , 779 F.2d 1040, 1044 (5th Cir. 1986); Wolff v. McDonnel , 418 U.S. 539, 563-64 (1974); Pichardo v. Kinker , 73 F.3d 612, 612-13 (5th Cir. 1996). Juarez’s § 1983 suit lacked an arguable basis in law, and the district court’s dismissal of the complaint as frivolous was not an abuse of discretion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 31-34 (1992). To the extent that Juarez’s brief requests the appointment of counsel for his appeal or challenges the district court’s denial of his district court motion for the appointment of counsel, Juarez does not make the requisite showing for the appointment of counsel or that one was necessary in the district
court. See Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). His request is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
31.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act







I, Steven
Goertz, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
getprokerrakeback.com;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:




a.           designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;




b.           evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and




c.           presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):




a.           all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and




b.           any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and






6. I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th
day of April 14, 2008.





/s/  Steven
Goetz


Chief
Executive Officer