33052 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Proposed Rules

in accordance with the service bulletin

described previously.

Additionally, the proposed AD would

remove Model 767 series airplanes from

the applicability of the existing AD,

since the subject unsafe condition on

those airplanes is addressed in AD 95–

08–11.

Cost Impact

There are approximately 400 Model

747 series airplanes of the affected

design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA

estimates that 125 airplanes of U.S.

registry would be affected by this

proposed AD.

The actions that are currently

required by AD 92–16–17 take

approximately 12 work hours per

airplane to accomplish, at an average

labor rate of $60 per work hour.

Required parts cost approximately $510

per airplane. Based on these figures, the

cost impact on U.S. operators of the

actions currently required is estimated

to be $153,750, or $1,230 per airplane.

The new actions that are proposed in

this AD action would take

approximately 2 work hours per

airplane to accomplish, at an average

labor rate of $60 per work hour.

Required parts would cost

approximately $6,400 per airplane.

Based on these figures, the cost impact

on U.S. operators of the proposed

requirements of this AD is estimated to

be $815,000, or $6,520 per airplane.

The cost impact figures discussed

above are based on assumptions that no

operator has yet accomplished any of

the current or proposed requirements of

this AD action, and that no operator

would accomplish those actions in the

future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact

The regulations proposed herein

would not have substantial direct effects

on the States, on the relationship

between the national government and

the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the

various levels of government. Therefore,

in accordance with Executive Order

12612, it is determined that this

proposal would not have sufficient

federalism implications to warrant the

preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this proposed regulation (1)

is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if

promulgated, will not have a significant

economic impact, positive or negative,

on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft

regulatory evaluation prepared for this

action is contained in the Rules Docket.

A copy of it may be obtained by

contacting the Rules Docket at the

location provided under the caption

ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration proposes to amend part

39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

removing amendment 39–8327 (57 FR

47987, October 21, 1992), and by adding

a new airworthiness directive (AD), to

read as follows:

Boeing: Docket 95–NM–226–AD. Supersedes

AD 92–16–17, Amendment 39–8327.

Applicability: Model 747–100, –200, and

–300 series airplanes equipped with an offwing, two-piece escape slide on Door 3;

certificated in any category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in

the area subject to the requirements of this

AD. For airplanes that have been modified,

altered, or repaired so that the performance

of the requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent failure of the escape slide to

deploy, which could delay and possibly

jeopardize the successful emergency

evacuation of an airplane, accomplish the

following:

(a) Within 18 months after November 25,

1992 (the effective date of AD 92–16–17,

amendment 39–8327), perform an inspection

of the door opening thrusters of the escape

system in accordance with OEA Service

Bulletin 2174200–25–013, dated July 29,

1991. Repeat this inspection thereafter at

intervals not to exceed 20 months until the

replacement required by paragraph (c) of this

AD is accomplished.

(b) Within 18 months after November 25,

1992, inspect and modify the door latching

mechanism of the escape slide compartment

in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin

747–25–2951, dated August 15, 1991.

(c) Within 2 years after the effective date

of this AD, replace the door opening thrusters

having part number (P/N) 60B50077–14 or

–17 with new thrusters having P/N

60B50077–19 in accordance with Boeing

Service Bulletin 747–25–3073, dated

September 21, 1995. Accomplishment of this

replacement terminates the repetitive

inspections required by this AD.

(d) As of the effective date of this AD, no

person shall install a door opening thruster

having P/N 60B50077–14 or –17 on any

airplane.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, Seattle

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Seattle ACO.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 19,

1996.

Darrell M. Pederson,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 96–16243 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 202

[Docket No. RM 95–7A]

Registration of Claims to Copyright,

Group Registration of Photographs

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of

Congress.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing;

correction.

SUMMARY: This document corrects the

July 15, 1996, deadline for submission

of written comments concerning the

rulemaking on claims to copyright

group registration of photographs that

was published in the Federal Register of

June 6, 1996 (61 FR 28829).

DATES: Submission of all written

comments is on or before Thursday,

August 15, 1996.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Proposed Rules 33053

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marilyn J. Kretsinger, Acting General

Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box

70400, Southwest Station, Washington,

D.C. 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8380.

Facsimile: (202) 707–8366.

Dated: June 20, 1996.

Marilyn J. Kretsinger,

Acting General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 96–16194 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1410–30–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 61

[FRL–5527–3]

National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants; National

Emission Standard for Radon

Emissions From Phosphogypsum

Stacks

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of public hearing.

SUMMARY: The Office of Radiation and

Indoor Air, Radiation Protection

Division will hold a public hearing on

the proposed rule for 40 CFR Part 61,

Subpart R, (Subpart R) the National

Emission Standard for Radon Emissions

from Phosphogypsum Stacks—Notice of

Reconsideration. This proposed rule

was in response to The Fertilizer

Institute’s Petition for Reconsideration

of the National Emission Standards for

Hazardous Air Pollutants regulating

radon emissions from phosphogypsum

stacks. EPA partially granted and

partially denied the TFI petition for

reconsideration. Pursuant to that

decision, EPA is convening this

rulemaking to reconsider 40 CFR

61.205, the provision of the final rule

which governs distribution and use of

phosphogypsum for research and

development, and the methodology

utilized under 40 CFR Section 61.207 to

establish the average radium-226

concentration for phosphogypsum

removed from a phosphogypsum stack.

In the May 8, 1996 Federal Register

notice, EPA stated that the hearing, if

requested, would be in Washington,

D.C.; however, in order to provide the

public with a more convenient location

setting, the hearing will be held in

Orlando, Florida.

DATES: The hearing will be held on

Thursday, August 1, 1996, beginning at

9:00 am and will continue until

concluded. In addition, pursuant to

Section 307(d)(5), the public may

submit rebuttal and supplemental

information to the docket for thirty (30)

days after the public hearing. This

comment period will end on August 31,

1996.

ADDRESSES: The hearing will take place

at the Holiday Inn International Drive

Resort, 6515 International Drive,

Orlando, Florida 32819. Comments

should be submitted (in duplicate) to:

Central Docket Section (6101),

Environmental Protection Agency,

ATTN: Air Docket No. 94–57,

Washington, D.C. 20460. The docket is

available for public inspection between

the hours of 8:00 am and 5:30 pm,

Monday through Friday, in Room

M1500 of Waterside Mall, 401 M Street,

SW, Washington, DC 20460. A

reasonable fee may be charged for

copying. The FAX number is (202) 260–

4400.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita

Cestaric, Project Officer, Center for

Federal Guidance and Air Standards,

Radiation Protection Division, Office of

Radiation and Indoor Air (6602J),

Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington, DC 20460, (202) 233–9762.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

meeting is open to all members of the

public. Requests to attend and

participate in the public hearing on the

proposed rule for 40 CFR Part 61,

Subpart R, the National Emission

Standard for Radon Emissions from

Phosphogypsum Stacks—Notice of

Reconsideration (61 FR 20775, No. 90,

May 8, 1996), should be made by July

16, 1996 and submitted in writing to

Eleanor Thornton, Program Analyst,

Center for Office of Radiation and

Indoor Air (6602J), Environmental

Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460. Requests may

also be faxed to EPA at (202) 233–9629

or 233–9626. Requests to participate in

the public hearing should also include

an outline of the topics to be addressed,

the amount of time requested, and the

names of the participants. EPA may also

allow testimony to be given at the

hearing without prior notice, subject to

time restraints and at the discretion of

the hearing officer. Three (3) copies of

testimony should be submitted at the

time of appearance at the hearings. An

agenda will be available at the hearing.

Dated: June 20, 1996.

Mary D. Nichols,

Assistant Administrator for Air and

Radiation.

[FR Doc. 96–16331 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 80

[FRL–5522–2]

RIN 2060–AG43

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel

Additives: Controls Applicable to

Gasoline Retailers and Wholesale

Purchaser-Consumers; 10 Gallon Per

Minute Fuel Dispensing Limit

Requirement Implementation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking

(NPRM).

SUMMARY: On January 20, 1993 EPA

finalized a requirement limiting vehicle

service station fuel dispensing rates to

10 gallons per minute (gpm) maximum,

beginning January 1, 1996 for retailers

and wholesale purchaser-consumers

handling over 10,000 gallons of fuel per

month (55 FR 16002, March 24, 1993).

In 1995, various groups in the

petroleum industry requested that EPA

delay the January 1, 1996 deadline, due

mainly to the lack of available retrofit

parts needed for compliance with the

10gpm requirement. EPA is proposing to

delay the implementation date of the

10gpm requirement from January 1,

1996 until July 1, 1996. In addition, EPA

is proposing regulation changes to

clarify that the hardware/software for

controlling the fuel dispensing rate may

be located anywhere in the pump/

dispenser system and that refueling

facilities are exempt from the 10gpm

requirement if used exclusively to refuel

heavy-duty vehicles, boats or airplanes.

Because the rule revision is not

expected to receive any adverse

comments, the revision is also being

issued as a direct final rule in the Final

Rules section of this Federal Register.

DATES: Comments on the regulations

proposed by this action must be

received on or before July 26, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Materials relevant to the

initial final rule, and today’s action are

available for inspection in Public

Dockets A–89–18 and A–95–53 at Air

Docket Section, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, EPA Air Docket

Section (6102), First Floor, Waterside

Mall, Room M–1500, 401 M Street S.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20460 (telephone

202–260–7549, fax 202–260–4400)

between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5:30

p.m. A reasonable fee may be charged

by EPA for copying docket material.

All written comments must be

identified with the appropriate docket

number (Docket No. A–95–53) and must

be submitted in duplicate to the address

listed above, with a complimentary