alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16705]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Advisory Council on Violence Against Women

AGENCIES: Department of Justice and Department of Health and Human 
Services.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Council on Violence Against Women, cochaired by 
the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Department of Health and 
Human Services, will meet on July 18, 1996, at the Department of Health 
and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. The 
meeting is currently scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. and to end at 
4:30 p.m. The agenda consists of three breakout sessions in the 
morning, during which each of the Council's eight subgroups will meet. 
These subgroups are divided according to area of expertise and interest 
and include: Media and Entertainment; Colleges and Universities; 
Workplace; Religious Community; Sports Industry; Health Professionals; 
Primary and Secondary Education; and Law Enforcement. The afternoon 
session beginning at 1:30 p.m., will be a meeting of the full Advisory 
Council.
    The breakout sessions and the full meeting will be open to the 
public on a space-available basis, but reservations are required. A 
photo ID will be requested for admittance. Space reservations and 
arrangements for any special needs will be handled through the contact 
point listed below. Sign language interpreters will be provided. Anyone 
wishing to submit written questions to this session should notify the 
Designated Federal Employee by Friday, July 12, 1996. The notification 
may be done by mail, telegram, facsimile, or a hand delivered note. It 
should contain the requestor's name; corporate designation, consumer 
affiliation, or Government designation; and a short statement 
describing the topic to be addressed. Interested persons are encouraged 
to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding this meeting may be directed to the Office of the 
Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Room 
615F, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC. 20201, telephone 
(202) 690-8157, facsimile (202) 690-7595.

    Dated: June 25, 1996.
Bonnie J. Campbell,
Director, Violence Against Women Office, Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 96-16705 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 117 (Monday, June 17, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 30585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15207]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-122; RM-8795]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Riverdale, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Happy Nice Valley Broadcasting (``petitioner'') 
seeking the allotment of FM Channel 252A to Riverdale, California, as 
that locality's first local aural transmission service. Petitioner is 
requested to provide additional information to establish Riverdale's 
status as a community for allotment purposes. Coordinates used for this 
proposal are 36-20-39 and 119-53-59.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before July 29, 1996, and reply 
comments on or before August 13, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner, as follows: Happy Nice Valley 
Broadcasting, Attn: Joe S. Mauk, 365 W. Menlo Avenue, Fresno, CA 93704.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-122, adopted May 17, 
1996, and released June 5, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-15207 Filed 6-14-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
#### James NADEN, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 16148.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

Aug. 1, 1989.

*907Judith C. LaRose, Columbia, for movant-appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., John P. Pollard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

PREWITT, Judge.

Movant pled guilty to sodomy and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He sought under Rule 24.035 to vacate that conviction. The trial court denied movant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal movant contends that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in not investigating the charge and that the trial court erred in not entering specific findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning movant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel.

After a plea of guilty, the effectiveness of counsel is relevant only as it affects the voluntariness of the plea. *Wesson v. State,*768 S.W.2d 160, 162 (Mo.App.1989). Appellate review of such a motion is limited to determining whether the findings and conclusions of the trial court were clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(j).

Where the alleged error of counsel is a failure to investigate, the determination of whether the error prejudiced the defendant by causing him to plead guilty rather than go to trial will depend on the likelihood that discovery of the evidence would have led counsel to change his recommendation as to the plea. *Kline v. State,*704 S.W.2d 721, 722-723 (Mo.App.1986).

A motion for post-conviction relief claiming that an attorney’s investigation was inadequate must specifically allege what information the attorney failed to discover, that reasonable investigation would have disclosed that information, and that this information would have improved mov-ant’s position. *Blackmon v. State,*767 S.W.2d 81, 83 (Mo.App.1989). Failure to make specific allegations regarding such information renders the motion subject to denial without an evidentiary hearing because it fails to allege facts which entitle movant to relief. *Id.*at 84.

No specific facts were alleged as to what the additional investigation would have revealed, merely that “it would have established clearly that the Movant was not guilty”. Such an allegation is a conclusion and does not set forth facts indicating that counsel was ineffective so as to prejudice movant. In addition, by pleading guilty movant waived the complaints regarding his attorney’s failure to investigate. *Sanders v. State,*770 S.W.2d 447, 448 (Mo.App.1989).

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are adequate when they enable an appellate court to determine whether they are clearly erroneous. *Huffman v. State,*668 S.W.2d 255, 256 (Mo.App.1984). Although findings and conclusions are sparse, they are sufficient if they permit meaningful appellate review. *Wesson v. State,*supra 768 S.W.2d at 162. The basis of the trial court’s determination was sufficiently set forth for us to determine that it was not clearly erroneous.

The judgment is affirmed.

FLANIGAN, P.J., and HOGAN, J., concur.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 257   Filed 08/09/18   Page 1 of 1
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1113-2 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:19-cr-10080-NMG Document 1679 Filed 12/21/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1113-2 Filed 01/19/21 Page 2 of 2 Case 1:19-cr-10080-NMG Document 1679 Filed 12/21/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3693 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3693

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a capital loss 
     deduction with respect to the sale or exchange of a principal 
                               residence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 1996

  Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Gilman, and Mr. Shays) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a capital loss 
     deduction with respect to the sale or exchange of a principal 
                               residence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPITAL LOSS DEDUCTION ALLOWED WITH RESPECT TO SALE OR 
              EXCHANGE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 165 (relating to 
limitation on losses of individuals) is amended by striking ``and'' at 
the end of paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end of 
paragraph (3) and inserting ``; and'', and by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(4) losses arising from the sale or exchange of the 
        principal residence (within the meaning of section 1034) of the 
        taxpayer.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to sales and exchanges after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
aaedaOaad Uesty oad oustees oc39 tt

Dockets.Justia.com
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35813-35814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission; Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date of the nineteenth meeting of 
the Gettysburg National Military Park Advisory Commission.

DATES: The Public meeting will be held on July 18, 1996, from 7:00 
p.m.--9:00 p.m.

    Location: The meeting will be held at Gettysburg Cyclorama 
Auditorium, 125 Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

AGENDA: Sub-Committee Reports, Facilities Development Planning Process, 
Operational Update on Park Activities, and Citizens Open Forum.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John A. Latschar, Superintendent, Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 
Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Any 
member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement 
concerning agenda items. The statement should be addressed to the 
Advisory Commission, Gettysburg National Military Park, 97 Taneytown 
Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325. Minutes of the meeting will be 
available for inspection four weeks after the meeting at the permanent 
headquarters of the Gettysburg National Military Park located at 97 
Taneytown Road, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania 17325.


[[Page 35814]]


    Dated: June 26, 1996.
Warren D. Beach,
Acting Field Director, Northeast Field Area.
[FR Doc. 96-17181 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS PENSION 

TRUST FUND METROPOLITAN AREA, et al., 

Plaintiffs, Case No. 08-15200 

vs. Hon. Robert H. Cleland 

METRO JOINT SEALANTS, L.L.C., and 

METRO JOINT SEALANTS OF MICHIGAN, INC. 

 Defendants. 

NOVARA TESIJA, P.L.L.C. 

Bryan M. Beckerman (P51925) 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

2000 Town Center, Suite 2370 

Southfield, MI 48075 

(248) 354-0380 

bmb@novaratesija.com 

FRASCO CAPONIGRO WINEMAN & 

SCHEIBLE, P.L.L.C. 

J. Christian Hauser (P57990) 

Attorney for Defendants 

1668 Telegraph Road, Ste. 200 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

CONSENT JUDGMENT 

At a session of said Court, held in Detroit, Michigan 

on March 23, 2011 

PRESENT: Hon._ROBERT H. CLELAND 

 U.S. District Court Judge 

This matter having come before the Court; and upon the terms of a Consent Judgment 

having been reached by the stipulation of the parties; and the Court being otherwise fully advised 

in the premises.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall have a judgment in their favor and 

against Defendants Metro Joint Sealants, L.L.C. and Metro Joint Sealants of Michigan, Inc., in 

the amount of $600,647.60 for unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, interest 

and relevant costs. 

2:08-cv-15200-RHC-VMM Doc # 27 Filed 03/23/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 467
2 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that post-judgment interest shall accrue at statutory 

interest rates. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter 

pending satisfaction of this judgment and/or compliance with any additional orders. 

_S/Robert H. Cleland 

 United States District Court Judge 

Approved as to form and content: 

By: _/s/Bryan M. Beckerman 

NOVARA TESIJA, P.L.L.C. 

Bryan M. Beckerman (P51925) 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

2000 Town Center, Suite 2370 

Southfield, MI 48075-1314 

By: /s/J. Christian Hauser (with permission) 

FRASCO CAPONIGRO WINEMAN & 

SCHEIBLE, P.L.L.C. 

J. Christian Hauser (P57990) 

Attorney for Defendants 

1668 Telegraph Road, Ste. 200 

Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302 

W:\FUNDS\Bricklayers\COLLECTION\Metro Joint Sealants, LLC\Pleadings\Consent Judgment.doc

2:08-cv-15200-RHC-VMM Doc # 27 Filed 03/23/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 468
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Terry ROBERSON, Appellant.

No. WD 47385.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 28, 1995.

Patricia A. Richter, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Terry Roberson was convicted of first degree robbery and armed criminal action in connection with the robbery of a McElroy Oil Company gas station which occurred February 27, 1992. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent sentences of 25 years and 10 years for the robbery and armed criminal action, respectively. He was sentenced as a prior, persistent and class X offender.

Roberson contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial defense counsel failed to call an alibi witness, and that the motion court erred in denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion after hearing. He also contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after a police detective referred to the fact that, in order to conduct a photo line-up, he obtained a photograph of defendant from police department files. Defendant contends such reference constituted impermissible evidence of other crimes because it suggested he had a criminal history. Defendant also challenges the peremptory strikes exercised by the prosecution under *Batson v. Kentucky,*476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), on grounds that the strikes were not shown to be race-neutral, and that therefore he was deprived of his right to a properly selected jury. He also contends that the identification of defendant by the robbery victim was unreliable because the robber was wearing a ski mask, and that testimony concerning a voluntary statement made by defendant to the police should have been excluded because the police caused him to be confused about the date of the robbery.

*667Defendant’s points are without merit. Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. 

Huntsville, Alabama 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-161952, 333-149192, 333-139202, 333-111329, and 333-101007) of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. of our reportsdated March 22, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements, the effectiveness of ITC^DeltaCom, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia

March 22, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff Case No. 09-10091

Hon. Robert H. Cleland

-v- Claim No. 1998A16486

BRENDA D. TRIPP,

Defendant.

ORDER ALLOWING RECORDS SUBPOENA

At a session of said Court held in the

City of Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan,

on March 24, 2009

PRESENT: HONORABLE_ROBERT H. CLELAND

Upon the reading and filing of the Petition of the Plaintiff, and this Court being

more fully informed and duly advised in the premises:

And upon the Motion of PAMELA S. RITTER, attorney for the Plaintiff;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff may issue a subpoena to CHASE

MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION requesting a copy of the

Defendant’s mortgage application and copies of any bank checks used to make

payments on account in the last six months and /or the bank routing number of

any online payments made in the last six months.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

 ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 24, 2009

2:09-cv-10091-RHC-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 03/24/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 43
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of

record on this date, March 24, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

 Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-10091-RHC-MKM Doc # 13 Filed 03/24/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 44
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34431-34432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 34432]]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Project No. 2705-003 Washington]


Seattle City Light; Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental 
Assessment

June 26, 1996.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
Regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Hydropower Licensing has reviewed the application for a new license 
for the existing Newhalem Creek Hydroelectric Project, and has prepared 
a Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the project. The project is 
located on Newhalem Creek, a tributary of the Skagit River, near the 
town of Newhalem, in northern Washington.
    In the DEA, the Commission's staff has analyzed the potential 
environmental impacts of the project and has concluded that approval of 
the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would 
not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect 
the quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the DEA are available for review in the Public Reference 
Branch, Room 2A, of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this 
notice and should be addressed to Lois D. Cashell, Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, D.C. 
20426. For further information, contact Mr. John Costello, 
Environmental Coordinator, at (202) 219-2914.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16815 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 18

Dockets.Justia.com
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen P. Kelly, certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chordiant Software, Inc.; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b.  designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c.  evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation;and 

 

d.  disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.