alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) on the Form 10-Q of Siga Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the six months ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edwin Morrow, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: March 14, 2011  /s/ EDWIN MORROW Edwin Morrow Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Order entered April 9 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00161 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF T .R.N., ET AL., CHILD REN On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Cour t

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 17 - 00385 - X



### O RDER Befo re the Court is appellant Father’s April 8, 2019 motion to extend time for filing brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER Father’s brief be filed no later than April 29, 2019. Because th is is an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case, we caution Father that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1219 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1219

 To amend subtitle A of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and 
  Reform Act of 2004 to extend the operation of such subtitle for a 1-
                   year period ending June 22, 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 2009

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend subtitle A of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and 
  Reform Act of 2004 to extend the operation of such subtitle for a 1-
                   year period ending June 22, 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Antitrust Criminal Penalties 
Enforcement and Reform Act of 2004 Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. DELAY OF SUNSET.

    Section 211(a) of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and 
Reform Act of 2004 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is amended by striking ``5 
years'' and inserting ``6 years''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE OF AMENDMENT.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect immediately 
before June 22, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 19, 2021

No. 04-20-00058-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH CURTIS ANDREWS, DECEASED,

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-04-0239-CVW

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Appellant’s motion for rehearing and/or motion for en banc reconsideration was due on 

June 24, 2021. Appellant has been granted one previous extension, until July 15, 2021. On July 

15, 2021, appellant filed a motion requesting a seven-day extension of time. The motion is 

GRANTED and appellant’s motion for rehearing and/or motion for en banc reconsideration is 

due no later than July 22, 2021. 

It is so ORDERED July 19, 2021.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Adrian WRIGHT, Defendant/Appellant. Adrian WRIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 67894, 69468.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

July 30, 1996.

Kathleen G. Henry, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Joanne E. Joiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, C.J., AHRENS, J., and WILLIAM E. TURNAGE, Senior Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Adrian Wright appeals his conviction of murder in the second degree, § 565.021.1(2), RSMo 1994,1 robbery in the first degree § 569.020 and two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, with a sentence of 20 years for murder, a consecutive term of 30 years for robbery, and terms of five and ten years for each of the armed criminal action convictions which were ordered to run concurrently with one another and with the sentences of murder and robbery. Wright also appeals the denial, on the merits, without an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion, but no claim of error is alleged or briefed in connection with that appeal and that appeal is deemed to be abandoned. *State v. Nelson,*818 S.W.2d 285, 287[1] (Mo.App.1991).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise noted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BAE Industries, Incorporated,

Plaintiff(s),

v. Case No. 2:08−cv−14497−AC−DAS

Hon. Avern Cohn

Whitesell Corporation, et al.,

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING

 You are hereby notified to appear before the Honorable Avern Cohn at the United States

District Court, Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse, 231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Detroit,

Michigan. The following motion(s) are scheduled for hearing:

Motion for TRO − #2

• MOTION HEARING: 11/10/08 at 02:00 PM

Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that this Notice was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of

record were served.

By: s/ J. Owens 

Case Manager

Dated: October 27, 2008

2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 14 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 373
EX-10.4



 EXHIBIT 10.4 

FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into on March 31, 2014, by and between
MASTEC, INC., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and ROBERT APPLE (“Employee”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee previously entered into an Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2010 (the
“Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement as of
the date hereof in certain respects. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts, mutual promises, and covenants contained herein
and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
 1. Section 4(f) of the Employment Agreement is
hereby amended and restated, in its entirety, to read as follows: 
 “f. Equity. As of the Effective Date, Employee
shall receive 37,500 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Restricted Stock”), which shall vest 100% on the third anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Vesting Date”). So long as the Employee is not terminated for
Cause (as defined in Section 11(c) hereof) and has not breached any of his obligations set forth in Sections 6, 7 and 8 hereof, the Restricted Stock and any other restricted stock issuances or stock options grants Employee may have during the
Term shall continue to vest until they are fully vested and all existing and future stock option grants will remain exercisable by Employee for the full term of the grant. The Restricted Stock will be subject to the terms and conditions of the
Company’s incentive plans, as in effect and as may be amended from time to time in the Company’s sole discretion.” 
 2.
Section 12(g) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated, in its entirety, to read as follows: 
 “g. Tax
Gross-Ups. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, payment of any tax reimbursements under this Agreement must be made by no later than the end of the taxable year of the Employee following the taxable year of the
Employee in which the Employee remits the related taxes and the payment of any tax reimbursements under this Agreement shall be based on Employee’s actual marginal tax rate of the Federal, state, local, or foreign taxes imposed upon Employee as
a result of compensation paid or made available to Employee, including the additional taxes imposed upon Employee due to the Company’s payment of the initial taxes on such compensation.” 

3. Except as amended herein, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 







 [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 

  
 2 








 EXECUTED as of the date set forth in the first paragraph of this Amendment. 

 

			
	EMPLOYEE
	
	 /s/ Robert Apple

	Robert Apple
	
	MASTEC, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jose Mas

		 	Jose Mas, Chief Executive Officer



  
 3
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**(Section 302 ofSarbanes-Oxley)**

 

I, Dean Fletcher, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Manhattan Bancorp, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Manhattan Bancorp;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) internalcontrols over the financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant is made known to us by others within that entity, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based upon our evaluation; and

 

c.     disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control that occurred during the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.     allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|   Date: May 13, 2008 | /s/  Dean Fletcher            |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                | Dean Fletcher                 |
|                                | Executive  Vice President and |
|                                | Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN,
Case Number 08-CV-14922
Plaintiff, Hon. Patrick J. Duggan

Vv.

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD

OF TRUSTEES, GARY D. RUSSI, MARY BETH
SNYDER, and LIONEL MATEN, in their

official capacities,

Defendants.
/

MICHIGAN PROTECTION & BUTZEL LONG, a professional
ADVOCACY SERVICE, INC. corporation
Chris E. Davis (P52159) By: Robert A. Boonin (P38172)
Gabrielle S. Frampton (P59499) 350 S. Main Street, Suite 300
29200 Vassar Blvd., Suite 200 Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Livonia, MI 48152 (734) 995-3110
Phone: (248) 473-2990 Attorneys for Defendants
Email: cdavis@mpas.org boonin@butzel.com
Attorney for Plaintiff

DEFENDANTS’ FIRST AMENDMENT TO WITNESS LIST
Defendants Oakland University Board of Trustees, Gary D. Russi, Mary Beth
Snyder and Lionel Maten, in their official capacities, by their attorneys, Butzel Long, a
professional corporation, in accordance with Rules 26(a)(2)(A) and 26(a)(2)(C) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby amend their Witness List to identify the
following expert witness:
Professor John H. Schuh

1706 Amherst Drive
Ames, IA 50014



Professor Schuh’s Report and other information required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are being provided to Plaintiffs counsel forthwith.
BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By:__/s/ Robert A. Boonin
Robert A. Boonin (P38172)
Regan K. Dahle (P53975)
350 S. Main St., Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
(734) 995-3110
Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: October 14, 2009



Certificate of Service
I, Robert A. Boonin, hereby certify that on August 31, 2009, I electronically filed
Defendant’s First Amendment to Witness List with the Clerk of the court using the ECF
system, which will send notification of such filing to the following counsel of record, and
I also served copy of Defendant’s First Amendment to Witness List, along with the
Report and Vita of the expert witness identified therein, to the following counsel by first

class mail and e-mail:

Chris E. Davis

Michigan Protection & Advocacy Service, Inc.
29200 Vassar Blvd., Ste. 200

Livonia, MI 48152

(248) 473-2990

cdavis@mpas.org
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Respectfully submitted,
BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin
Robert A. Boonin (P38172)
Regan K. Dahle (P53975)

350 South Main Street, Suite 300

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

(734) 995-3110

boonin@butzel.com

dahle@butzel.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Dated: October 14, 2009
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 D0 12 8 . DANI EL W . TAYLOR v . GREGORY A. ADAMS, et a l

.

Dan i el Tay lo r fi l ed th i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i on ary rev iew, s eek i n g to ap p eal

t wo co u rt o rd ers den y i n g h is req u es t s t o p ro ceed i n f o r m a p au peri s fo r th e p u rp o s e

o f s eek i n g m an d am

u s rel i ef ag ai n s t s ev eral d efen dan t s . W e l ack ju ri sd i ct i o n

. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ex cl u s i v e ap p el la te j ur isdic tion ove r a l l c a s e s i nv o l v i n g

ex t rao rd i n ary rem ed i es , in cl u d in g m an d am u s

. See Ga. Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3
, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (5 ); La dz i ns ke v. Al l en , 2 8 0 Ga. 2 6 4
, 2 6 4 (6 2 6 SE2 d 8 3) (2 0 0 6) (“ [C] as es i n v o l v i n g t h e g ran t o r d en i al of m an d a m u s a re wi t h i n t h e ex cl u s i v e ju ri s d i ct i o n o f [t he Su p rem e] Co u rt wi t h o u t reg ard t o t h e u nd erl y i n g s u b ject m at t er o r t h e l eg al
i s su es rai s ed

. ” (p u n ct u at i o n om i t t ed )). Acco rd i n g l y , t h is cas e i s h ere b y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su prem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/30/2015 November 30, 2015
Order issued December 19. 2012 

# 0

In The 

### rtiitrt nfAppctts 

## FiftIi JitrirI tit (1!i 

### ztt tkt11ZI! No. 05-l2-01-l96-C’ IN RE AFTERMATh, INC., Relator Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04971 

### ORDER Before Justices Moseley. FitzGerald. and Myers Based on the Court’s opinion ofthis date, we DiSMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

### mandamus. We ORDERthat relatorbearthe costs 

### ofthis original proceeding.
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO


EXHIBIT 10.40




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

THE PHOENIX COMPANIES, INC.  

EQUITY DEFERRAL PLAN

As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009




The Phoenix Companies, Inc. Equity Deferral Plan (the "Plan"), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, is amended effective as indicated as follows:




1.

Effective March 7, 2013, Section 4.03 is added to read as follows:




4.03

Compensation Recovery Policy (“Clawback Policy”).

If an Employee is covered under the Company’s Compensation Recovery Policy, as currently in effect and as amended from time to time (“Clawback Policy”), under certain circumstances, the Company is allowed to recover incentive compensation paid to certain employees.  The benefits provided under this Plan are incentive compensation and are subject to the Clawback Policy, a copy of the currently effective version of which has been provided to the covered Employee, and such benefits shall be repaid to the Company if and to the extent that the Company’s Board of Directors determines that repayment must be made pursuant to the Clawback Policy.










 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Plan is adopted this 15 day of January, 2014.







On Behalf of

The Phoenix Companies, Inc.

Board of Directors/Compensation Committee







/s/ Jody A. Beresin_________________________

Jody A. Beresin

Senior Vice President

Administration
aaedaOaad Uesty oad oustees oc39 tt3

Dockets.Justia.com
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33492-33493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 062196B]


South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a public meeting of its Ad Hoc Bycatch Reduction Device (BRD) 
Advisory Panel.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 15, 1996, 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 
p.m. and July 16, 1996, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Town and Country Inn, 2008 
Savannah Highway, Charleston, SC 29407; telephone: (803) 571-1000.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, One 
Southpark Circle, Suite 306; Charleston, SC 29407-4699.


[[Page 33493]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Buchanan, Public Information 
Officer; telephone: (803) 571-4366; fax: (803) 769-4520; E-mail: 
Susan_B<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#70051318111e111e300311161d135e1e1d16035e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6d3c5cec7c8c7c8e6d5c7c0cbc588c8cbc0d588c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
     The BRD Advisory Panel will meet to review the testing protocol 
used in the Cooperative Bycatch Research Project and will develop, 
modify, and specify the statistical guidelines for future BRD testing 
protocol and performance criteria.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to the Council office (see ADDRESSES) 
by July 8, 1996.

    Dated: June 21,1996.
Donald J. Leedy,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-16487 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 (the Report), I, Vincent McNelley,
Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                           
|------------ |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 20, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Vincent McNelley                                                      
|             |  |  | 
|             |  |  |  |  |  | Vincent McNelley                                                          
|             |  |  |  |  |  | Acting Principal Financial Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer