alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Anthony A. DiTonno, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeurogesX, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: May 15, 2008



By:

/s/ Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonno President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 26, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00039

- CV

MOMENTUM CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC

,

Appellant

v.

Keith DILL , D&K Energy Services, LLC and DK Manufacturing, LLC, Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 18711 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judg e Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction. Appellee s’ brief was due April 20, 2016

. Neither the brief nor a motio n for extension of time

was filed.

We therefore ORDER appellees to file their appellees’ brief and a written response reasonably explaining their failure to timely file the brief in this court on or before May 6, 2016

. If appellees fail to file a brief and the writt en response by the date ordered, we will order the case submitted without an appellees ’ brief.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26th day of April, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EX-10.86






Exhibit 10.86




AMENDMENT

TO OFFER LETTER AGREEMENT




     This Amendment to Offer Letter Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 31,
2008 (the “Effective Date”), between Christina Yang and Gen-Probe Incorporated, a Delaware
corporation (“Gen-Probe”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, on April 27, 2007, you and Gen-Probe entered into an offer letter (the “Agreement”)
which set forth certain terms of your employment with Gen-Probe and provides for certain relocation
assistance benefits; and



     WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the relocation assistance provision of the Agreement to
reflect recent changes affecting the taxation of deferred compensation arrangements under Section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, pursuant to the terms and conditions set
forth below.



AGREEMENT




     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein,
the parties hereby agree as follows effective as of the Effective Date.



     1. The following shall be added at the end of the Relocation Assistance section :



     “To the extent that the relocation assistance reimbursements described above are subject to
the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), (a)
the reimbursement shall be made in the no later than December 31 of the calendar year following the
year in which the expense was incurred, (b) the amount of expenses reimbursed in one year shall not
affect the amount eligible for reimbursement in any subsequent year, and (c) your right to
reimbursement as described above will not be subject to liquidation or exchange for another
benefit.”



     2. Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.



     3. This Amendment shall be governed by the law of the State of California as such laws are
applied to agreements between California residents entered into and to be performed entirely within
the State of California.



[Signature page follows]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	             /s/ Christina Yang 	 
	 	Christina Yang 	 
	 	 	 
	 	GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED

 	 
	 	By:  	     /s/ Diana De Walt
 	 
	 
	 	Its: Senior Vice President, Human Resources

 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 



2
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gregory S. Weishar, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PharMerica Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. [Intentionally omitted] 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

DATE: November 8, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                        Exhibit 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

On Display, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware.

Oberon Software, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts.

DataSage, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts.

Engine 5, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware.

Vignette Holdings, L.L.C., organized under the laws of Delaware.

Vignette International, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware.

Vignette Public Sector & Education, Inc. (formerly known as Vignette Federal
Corporation), incorporated under the laws of Delaware.

Vignette Europe Limited, organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.

Vignette SARL, organized under the laws of France.

Vignette Deutschland GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany.

Vignette Australia Pty Limited, organized under the laws of Australia.

Vignette Hong Kong Limited, organized under the laws of Hong Kong.

Vignette Asia Pte Ltd., organized under the laws of Singapore.
Exhibit F 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-8 Filed 10/04/18 Page 8 of 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

MICAH FIALKA-FELDMAN, 

 Case Number 08-CV-14922 

 Plaintiff, Hon. Patrick J. Duggan 

v. 

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD 

OF TRUSTEES, GARY D. RUSSI, MARY BETH 

SNYDER, and LIONEL MATEN, in their 

official capacities, 

 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________________________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Defendants, Oakland University Board of Trustees and Gary D. 

Russi, Mary Beth Snyder and Lionel Maten, in their official capacities, hereby appeal to the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit from the “Opinion and Order” entered on December 

23, 2009 [Document 53] and the “Judgment” entered on January 7, 2010 [Document 54] by the 

Hon. Patrick J. Duggan, United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, 

Southern Division. Specifically, Defendants appeal the Judgment in its entirety and that portion of 

Judge Duggan’s Opinion and Order denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to 

Count IV of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, Violation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation 

Act of 1973, Denial of Reasonable Accommodation. 

Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), this Notice has been filed within 30 days of entry of 

the District Court's Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment [37] and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 55

Dockets.Justia.com
- 2 -

Substitution of Defendant, Summary Judgment and Permanent Injunction [39] entered by Judge 

Duggan on December 23, 2009 and within 30 days of entry of the Judgment on January 7, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin 

Robert A. Boonin (P38172) 

Regan K. Dahle (P53975) 

350 South Main Street, Suite 300 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 

(734) 995-3110 

boonin@butzel.com

dahle@butzel.com

Attorneys for Defendants 

Dated: January 19, 2010 
- 3 -

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on January 19, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing paper, 

Notice of Appeal, with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the attorneys of record. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation

By: /s/ Robert A. Boonin 

Robert A. Boonin (P38172) 

Regan K. Dahle (P53975) 

350 South Main Street, Suite 300 

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 

(734) 995-3110 

boonin@butzel.com

dahle@butzel.com

Attorneys for Defendants
#### KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant, v. John W. COMBS, Respondent.

No. 95-SC-1061-KB.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

Feb. 22, 1996.

*ORDER OF DISBARMENT*

Respondent, John Combs, was suspended from the practice of law for two years in April of 1994. The suspension resulted from violations of SCR 3.130-1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a), *7541.16(d) and 8.3(c). Pursuant to this Court’s order of suspension, respondent was ordered, among other things, to: 1) comply with the provisions of SCR 3.390 which require suspended attorneys to “notify all courts, in which he has active matters pending, and all clients for whom he is actively involved in litigation” of his suspension; and, 2) return all active files to his clients.

On September 23, 1994 a subsequent complaint was filed against respondent. Respondent received notification of the complaint by certified mail and failed to respond to the complaint. Subsequently, the Inquiry Tribunal issued four (4) charges against respondent. Several attempts were made to inform respondent of these charges. He has failed to respond in any manner. Thereafter, the Board of Governors of the Kentucky Bar Association found respondent guilty of three of the four charges and recommended disbarment.

The specific charges include the following violations of the disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

Count I — respondent failed to notify an active client of suspension in violation of SCR 3.130-3.4(e);

Count II — respondent failed to surrender a client’s file in violation of SCR 3.130 — 1.16(d); and

Count III — respondent communicated to the client that the file would be returned but then failed to do so, in violation of SCR 3.130-8.3(e).

Upon review of this matter, it is the Order of this Court that the respondent be disbarred, effective upon the issuance of this order, as recommended by the Board of Governors. Respondent is further ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding in the amount of $41.88.

STEPHENS, C.J., and GRAVES, LAMBERT, KING, STUMBO and WINTERSHEIMER, JJ., sitting.

All concur.

/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WebSafety, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rowland
W. Day II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ Rowland W. Day IIRowland
      W. Day IIPrincipal
      Executive Officer




Dated:
November 23, 2009




This
certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to WebSafety, Inc. and will be retained and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16549]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than July 19, 1996.

    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:

    1. Claude Williams, Jr., Athens, Georgia; to retain 10.92 percent 
of the voting shares of Georgia National Bancorp, Inc., Athens, 
Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire The Georgia National Bank, 
Athens, Georgia.

    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166:

    1. Paula O. Blackwell, Piggott, Arkansas; to replace the current 
sole trustee of the Gaylon M. Lawrence, Jr. Irrevocable Trust, to 
acquire an additional 24.74 percent, for a total of 100 percent, of the 
voting shares of Farmers Bancorp, Inc., Blytheville, Arkansas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Farmers Bank & Trust Company, Blytheville, 
Arkansas.

    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

    1. Tommy Mayhew Lovell, Jr., Farmersville, Texas; to acquire an 
additional .67 percent, for a total of 10.40 percent, of the voting 
shares of Farmersville Bancshares, Inc., Farmersville, Texas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire First Bank, Farmersville, Texas.

    2. John Gordon Muir, Jr., Houston, Texas; to acquire 17.39 percent 
of the voting shares of Thorndale Bancshares, Inc., Thorndale, Texas, 
and thereby indirectly acquire Thorndale State Bank, Thorndale, Texas.


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 24, 1996.

William W. Wiles,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 96-16549 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### Audrey Jean CARAMANNA, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael Arthur CARAMANNA, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 65201.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 22, 1994.

Terry Lee Jones, Clayton, for appellant.

Hardy C. Menees, Clayton, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the determination and division of marital property and the calculation of child support payments pursuant to the entry of a decree of dissolution. We have reviewed the findings and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the trial court’s decree pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1640]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 012296B]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's Pacific Whiting 
Allocation Committee will hold public meetings.

DATES: The first of two meetings will be held on February 5 beginning 
at 1:00 p.m. The meeting may go into the evening until business for the 
day is completed and continue on February 6 from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 
p.m. The second meeting will be held on February 26 beginning at 1:00 
p.m. The meeting may go into the evening until business for the day is 
completed and continue on February 27 from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Pacific Fishery Management 
Council, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Glock, Groundfish Fishery 
Management Coordinator; telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of these meetings is to 
work towards developing a consensus recommendation to manage the 
whiting fishery after the current allocation expires at the end of 
1996. At the first meeting, analysts will report on the status of 
economic and social impact analyses as well as the results of the 1995 
whiting survey. The committee will develop management alternatives for 
further consideration. At the second meeting, the committee will 
continue to work towards narrowing the alternatives to the two that 
will be presented to the Council at its March meeting. A third meeting, 
as yet unscheduled, will be held after the Council meeting, at which 
time the committee will be directed to agree on a single proposal.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Eric Greene at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: January 24, 1996.
Richard W. Surdi,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-1640 Filed 1-25-96; 9:35 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-F