alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Court makes no determination as to the particular relevance of the materials at this

time.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RAYMOND LEE KYLE,

Petitioner,

CASE NO. 08-CV-14781

v. HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH

KENNETH ROMANOWSKI,

Respondent.

________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO EXPAND THE RECORD

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion to expand the record to add

documentation supporting an ineffective assistance of counsel claim contained in his habeas

petition. Respondent has not filed a reply to the motion. The Court may permit the record to be

expanded to include additional materials relevant to the determination of the habeas petition. See

Rule 7, Rules Governing Section § 2254 Cases. The documents submitted by Petitioner appear to

be relevant to the resolution of this matter.

1

 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion

and accepts the documents submitted with his motion as part of the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 18, 2010

S/George Caram Steeh 

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

May 18, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Josephine Chaffee

Deputy Clerk
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 2 of 16 Pg ID 2
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 3 of 16 Pg ID 3
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 4 of 16 Pg ID 4
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 5 of 16 Pg ID 5
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 6 of 16 Pg ID 6
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 7 of 16 Pg ID 7
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 8 of 16 Pg ID 8
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 9 of 16 Pg ID 9
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 10 of 16 Pg ID 10
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 11 of 16 Pg ID 11
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 12 of 16 Pg ID 12
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 13 of 16 Pg ID 13
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 14 of 16 Pg ID 14
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 15 of 16 Pg ID 15
2:09-cr-20027-PDB Doc # 1 Filed 01/23/09 Pg 16 of 16 Pg ID 16
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 63 / Tuesday, June 25, 1996 / Presidential Documents 32631

Presidential Determination No. 96-33 of June 21, 1996

Reconfirmation of Findings With Respect to the Trade

Agreement With the People’s Republic of China

Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

Since February 1, 1992, the United States of America and the People’s

Republic of China have had in effect a bilateral Agreement on Trade Relations,

in relation to which, pursuant to my authority under subsection 405(b)(1)

of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2435(b)(1)), I reconfirm that a satisfactory

balance of concessions in trade and services has been maintained during

the life of the Agreement and that actual or foreseeable reductions in U.S.

tariffs and nontariff barriers to trade resulting from multilateral negotiations

are, and continuously have been, satisfactorily reciprocated by the People’s

Republic of China.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal

[FR Doc. 96–16374

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, June 21, 1996.

.

œ–

Filed 6–24–96; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3190–01–P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00361

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.I.M

. and A.J.M., Children

From the 38th Judicial District Court

, Uvalde County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013

- 04

- 29187

- CV
Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND CHIEF JUSTICE MARION (Ret

. ) (sitting by assignment)

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s “Final Order” dated order dated March 29, 2022 is AFFIRMED.

We ORDER appell ee Roger Ruiz shall recover his costs incurred in this court from appellant Layla Martinez.

SIGNED November 15, 2023.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
#### Jerry Wayne RECTOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 55622.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 26, 1989.

Michael Wade Clark, Union, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Ronald L. Jurgeson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jerry Wayne Rector, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. We therefore affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 11, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-195

Lower Tribunal No. 89-6716

________________

Donald A. Williams,

Petitioner,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Mandamus.

Donald A. Williams, in proper person. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.

Before SUAREZ, FERNANDEZ, and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Williams seeks a petition for mandamus ordering the trial court to

provide him with an evidentiary hearing on his motion to correct an illegal
sentence. Williams seeks to attack the factual basis for imposition of the threeyear mandatory minimum sentence for firearm possession, and does not allege that

his sentence exceeded the maximum authorized by law. Thus, Florida Rule of

Criminal Procedure 3.850, rather than rule 3.800, is the proper procedural vehicle

for Williams to challenge the mandatory minimum sentence. Williams was

convicted in 1989, and because the two-year limitations period to file a motion

pursuant to rule 3.850 has expired, we deny Williams’ petition for mandamus. 

See Bradley v. State, 3 So. 3d 1168, 1170 (Fla. 2009); Leath v. State, 805 So. 2d

956, 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jeffery E.  Jones,  President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 06, 2008



                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERENCE ALVIN JOHNSON,

Petitioner, No. 09-CV-10395-DT

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

JEFFREY WOODS,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND

DISMISSING PETITIONER’S HABEAS CORPUS ACTION

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on January 24, 2012 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

 Chief Judge, United States District Court

This matter having come before the Court on the December 14, 2011 Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives recommending that

the Court deny Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and that this case,

accordingly, be dismissed; and Petitioner having timely filed Objections; and the Court

having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s

Objections, and the Court’s file of this action and having concluded that, for the reasons

stated in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s petition for habeas corpus relief

should be denied; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s

2:09-cv-10395-GER-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 01/24/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2300
Report and Recommendation of August 4, 2010 [Dkt. # 31] be, and hereby is, adopted by

this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s petition and amended petition for

habeas corpus relief Dkt. Nos. 1 and 15] be, and hereby are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Investigative Assistance

[Dkt. # 20] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be, and hereby is, DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Report and

Recommendation, the Court concludes that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a

certificate of appealability or grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. See

Fed. R. App. Pro. 24(a).

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: January 24, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on January 24, 2012, by electronic mail and upon Terence Johnson, #464914, Chippewa

Correctional Facility, 4269 W. M-80, Kincheloe, MI 49784 by ordinary mail.

s/Ruth A. Gunther 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10395-GER-PJK Doc # 34 Filed 01/24/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2301
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Stephen Kelly,certify that: 

 

1.  I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of Chordiant Software, Inc.; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b.  evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, based on suchevaluation; 

 

c.  Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1083 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1083

   To require that, in the questionnaires used in the taking of any 
 decennial census of population, a checkbox or other similar option be 
   included so that respondents may indicate Caribbean extraction or 
                                descent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2009

Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Gillibrand) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require that, in the questionnaires used in the taking of any 
 decennial census of population, a checkbox or other similar option be 
   included so that respondents may indicate Caribbean extraction or 
                                descent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Caribbean Count Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT RELATING TO CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRES.

    In conducting the 2010 decennial census and every decennial census 
thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce shall include, in any 
questionnaire distributed or otherwise used for the purpose of 
determining the total population by States, a checkbox or other similar 
option by which respondents may indicate Carribean extraction or 
descent.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SANDRA McCANDLESS, No. 08-14195

Plaintiff, District Judge Marianne O. Battani

v. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on September 4, 2013,

Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike IME Report or, in the alternative, Motion to Allow Discovery

[Doc. #134] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:

Plaintiff’s motion to strike the IME report of Dr. Rosenbaum is DENIED.

Plaintiff’s motion to allow discovery is GRANTED IN PART, only to the extent

that Plaintiff may serve narrowly tailored interrogatories and documents requests on Dr.

Rosenbaum, restricted to the issues relating to possible financial bias.

In all other respects, the motion to allow discovery is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 4, 2013 s/ R. Steven Whalen 

R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on

September 4, 2013, electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Michael Williams 

Case Manager to the 

Honorable R. Steven Whalen 

2:08-cv-14195-MOB-RSW Doc # 143 Filed 09/04/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 3872
---

EXHIBIT 8

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES (as at June 7, 2006)

Name
    Jurisdiction
    Business
    % of OwnershipSource Rock Holdings Limited
    New Zealand
    Holding company
    100%Austral Pacific Energy (NZ) Limited
    New Zealand
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Millennium Oil & Gas Limited
    New Zealand
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Rata Energy Limited
    New Zealand
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Totara Energy Limited
    New Zealand
    Shell company
    100%Kanuka Energy Limited
    New Zealand
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Odyssey International Pty Limited
    Australia
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Indo-Pacific Energy Australia Pty Limited
    Australia
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Trans-Orient Petroleum (Aust) Pty Limited
    Australia
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%ZOCA 96-16 Pty Limited
    Australia
    Shell company
    100%Trans-Orient Petroleum (PNG) Limited
    Papua New Guinea
    Oil and gas exploration and
      development
    100%Coral Sea Drilling Limited (1)
    Papua New Guinea
    Shell company
    35%


|(1) | Name changed from Rockwell Limited on September 19, 2005;
      65% shareholding transferred to Foreland Oil Limited with effect from
      January 29, 2005
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Linkwell Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Xuelian Bian, CEO and President
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      SS.
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Xuelian BianXuelian
                Bian,CEO
                and President,Principal
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Financial and Accounting OfficerApril
                15, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w49






Exhibit 10.49




UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC. RESTRICTED STOCK PLAN




RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT




FIRST AMENDMENT




          THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is entered into by
and between Exterran Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Stephen A. Snider
(the “Grantee”).




W I T N E S S E T H:




          WHEREAS, Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. previously granted to the Grantee, on June 12,
2007, 21,333 shares of its common stock under the Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. Restricted
Stock Plan for Executive Officers, as amended (the “Plan”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of
a Restricted Stock Agreement (the “Agreement”) and the Plan; and




          WHEREAS, as of August 20, 2007, the Company assumed the sponsorship of the Plan and the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) has the authority
to determine the terms and conditions of the Agreement; and




          WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that the Grantee’s termination of employment with the
Company (other than due to death, Disability or Cause) shall constitute “retirement” under the
Plan; and




          WHEREAS, the Committee and the Grantee desire to amend the Agreement to make certain changes
with regard to the vesting provisions of the Agreement;




          NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of October 27, 2008, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:




          1. Section 3(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end
thereof:





“Additionally, the Forfeiture Restrictions shall lapse, and the Unvested Shares
shall become vested and released from the Cancellation Right upon the termination of
the Grantee’s Continuous Service by reason of the Grantee’s retirement.”



1









 





          2. The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and, as amended by this Amendment, is
hereby ratified and affirmed in all respects.




2









 








          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment effective as of October
27, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Stephen M. Pazuk	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Chairman, Compensation Committee	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	GRANTEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Stephen A. Snider	 	 







3
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.5


                                 CERTIFICATION

                       Chase Manhattan Marine Owner Trust
                          Series 1997-A (the "Trust")

I, William L. Schumm, an Executive Vice President of The CIT Group/Sales
Financing, Inc., as servicer for the above-referenced Trust, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
     8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
     periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
     to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale and servicing
     agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
     under the sale and servicing agreement and based upon my knowledge and the
     annual compliance review required under the sale and servicing agreement
     and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the sale and servicing agreement; and

5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
     report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
     review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
     Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the sale and
     servicing agreement, that is included in these reports.





Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ William L. Schumm
------------------------------------------
Name:  William L. Schumm
Title: Executive Vice President
       The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.