35204 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 130 / Friday, July 5, 1996 / Notices

Agreement with Coral Power, L.L.C.

(Coral) under the NU System

Companies’ System Power Sales/

Exchange Tariff No. 6.

NUSCO states that a copy of this filing

has been mailed to Coral.

NUSCO requests that the Service

Agreement become effective sixty (60)

days following the Commission’s receipt

of the filing.

Comment date: July 10, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company; Metropolitan Edison

Company; Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER96–2194–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between

GPU and Duke/Louis Dreyfus L.L.C. (D/

LD), dated June 14, 1996. This Service

Agreement specifies that D/LD has

agreed to the rates, terms and conditions

of the GPU Operating Companies’

Operating Capacity and/or Energy Sales

Tariff (Sales Tariff) designated as FERC

Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.

The Sales Tariff was accepted by the

Commission by letter order issued on

February 10, 1995 in Jersey Central

Power & Light Co., Metropolitan Edison

Co. and Pennsylvania Electric Co.,

Docket No. ER95–276–000 and allows

GPU and D/LD to enter into separately

scheduled transactions under which the

GPU Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of June 14, 1996 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: July 10, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. MDU Resources Group, Inc.

[Docket No. ES96–31–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) filed

an application, under § 204 of the

Federal Power Act, seeking

authorization to issue up to 1,010,916

additional shares of Common Stock, par

value $3.33 in connection with MDU’s

tax deferred compensation savings plan

for non-bargaining unit employees.

MDU further requests an exemption

from the Commission’s competitive

bidding and negotiated placement

requirements.

Comment date: July 19, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. MDU Resources Group, Inc.

[Docket No. ES96–32–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) filed

an application, under § 204 of the

Federal Power Act, seeking

authorization to issue up to 743,661

additional shares of Common Stock, par

value $3.33 in connection with MDU’s

tax deferred compensation savings plan

for collective bargaining unit

employees. MDU further requests an

exemption from the Commission’s

competitive bidding and negotiated

placement requirements.

Comment date: July 19, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. MDU Resources Group, Inc.

[Docket No. ES96–33–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

MDU Resources Group, Inc. (MDU) filed

an application, under § 204 of the

Federal Power Act, seeking

authorization to issue up to 3,273,273

additional shares of Common Stock, par

value $3.33 in connection with MDU’s

automatic dividend reinvestment and

stock purchase plan. MDU further

requests an exemption from the

Commission’s competitive bidding and

negotiated placement requirements.

Comment date: July 19, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. MidAmerican Energy Company

[Docket No. ES96–34–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

MidAmerican Energy Company

(MidAmerican) filed an application,

under § 204 of the Federal Power Act,

seeking authorization to issue and sell

up to $500 million principal amount of

bonds, notes, debentures, guarantees or

other evidences of indebtedness of like

kind to bonds, notes or debentures.

MidAmerican further requests an

exemption from the Commission’s

competitive bidding and negotiated

placement requirements.

Comment date: July 19, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–17070 Filed 7–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

[Docket No. ER96–2197–000, et al.]

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, et

al.; Electric Rate and Corporate

Regulation Filings

June 27, 1996

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER96–2197–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(Niagara Mohawk), tendered for filing,

an amendment to its filing dated June

14, 1996, regarding the Marcy-South

Facilities Agreement with the Power

Authority of the State of New York

(NYPA).

Copies of this filing were served upon

NYPA and the Public Service

Commission of New York.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

2. Jersey Central Power & Light

Company; Metropolitan Edison

Company; Pennsylvania Electric

Company

[Docket No. ER96–2195–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

GPU Service Corporation (GPU), on

behalf of Jersey Central Power & Light

Company, Metropolitan Edison

Company and Pennsylvania Electric

Company (jointly referred to as the GPU

Operating Companies), filed an

executed Service Agreement between
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 130 / Friday, July 5, 1996 / Notices 35205

GPU and Southern Energy Marketing,

Inc. (SEM), dated June 17, 1996. This

Service Agreement specifies that SEM

has agreed to the rates, terms and

conditions of the GPU Operating

Companies’ Operating Capacity and/or

Energy Sales Tariff (Sales Tariff)

designated as FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1. The Sales Tariff

was accepted by the Commission by

letter order issued on February 10, 1995

in Jersey Central Power & Light Co.

Metropolitan Edison Co., and

Pennsylvania Electric Co., Docket No.

ER95–276–000 and allows GPU and

SEM to enter into separately scheduled

transactions under which the GPU

Operating Companies will make

available for sale, surplus operating

capacity and/or energy at negotiated

rates that are no higher than the GPU

Operating Companies’ cost of service.

GPU requests a waiver of the

Commission’s notice requirements for

good cause shown and an effective date

of June 17, 1996 for the Service

Agreement.

GPU has served copies of the filing on

regulatory agencies in New Jersey and

Pennsylvania.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

3. Public Service Company of

Oklahoma Southwestern Electric Power

Co.

[Docket No. ER96–2198–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

Public Service Company of Oklahoma

and Southwestern Electric Power

Company (collectively, the Companies),

tendered for filing a service agreement

under which they will provide

transmission service to Koch Power

Services, Inc. under their point-to-point

transmission service tariff.

The Companies state that a copy of

the filing has been served on Koch

Power Services, Inc.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

4. Central Power and Light Company

West Texas Utilities Company

[Docket No. ER96–2199–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

Central Power and Light Company and

West Texas Utilities Company, (jointly,

the Companies), tendered for filing

service agreements under which they

will provide transmission service to

Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.

and to Koch Power Services, Inc. under

their point-to-point transmission service

tariff.

The Companies state that copies of

the filing have been served on Brazos

Power Marketing Cooperative, Inc., and

on Koch Power Services, Inc.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

5. Commonwealth Edison Company

[Docket No. ER96–2200–000]

Take notice that on June 20, 1996,

Commonwealth Edison Company

(ComEd), tendered for filing new

Schedule 8 and related changes to its

PS–1 Tariff.

ComEd requests an effective date of

June 21, 1996 and has therefore

requested that the Commission waive

the Commission’s notice requirement.

Copies of this filing have been served on

the Illinois Commerce Commission and

all customers served under ComEd’s

PS–1 Tariff.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. Northern Indiana Public Service

Company

[Docket No. ER96–2201–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

Northern Indiana Public Service

Company, tendered for filing an

executed Standard Transmission

Service Agreement between Northern

Indiana Public Service Company and

Federal Energy Sales, Inc.

Under the Transmission Service

Agreement, Northern Indiana Public

Service Company will provide Point-toPoint Transmission Service to Federal

Energy Sales, Inc. pursuant to the

Transmission Service Tariff filed by

Northern Indiana Public Service

Company in Docket No. ER96–1426–000

and allowed to become effective by the

Commission. Northern Indiana Public

Service Company, 75 FERC ¶ 61,213

(1996). Northern Indiana Public Service

Company has requested that the Service

Agreement be allowed to become

effective as of July 1, 1996.

Copies of this filing have been sent to

the Indiana Utility Regulatory

Commission and the Indiana Office of

Utility Consumer Counselor.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Southern Company Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER96–2202–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

Southern Company Services, Inc. (SCS),

acting on behalf of Alabama Power

Company, Georgia Power Company,

Gulf Power Company, Mississippi

Power Company, and Savannah Electric

and Power Company (collectively

referred to as Southern Companies) filed

a service agreement between SCS, as

agent of the Southern Companies, and

CNG Power Services Corporation for

non-firm transmission service under the

Point-to-Point Transmission Service

Tariff of Southern Companies.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. New England Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–2203–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

New England Power Company filed a

Service Agreement and Certificates of

Concurrence with Aquila Power

Corporation under NEP’s FERC Electric

Tariffs, Original Volume Nos. 5 and 6.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Duke Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–2204–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

Duke Power Company (Duke), tendered

for filing a Transmission Service

Agreement (TSA) between Duke, on its

own behalf and acting as agent for its

wholly-owned subsidiary, Nantahala

Power and Light Company, and South

Carolina Public Service Authority

(SCPSA). Duke states that the TSA sets

out the transmission arrangements

under which Duke will provide SCPSA

non-firm transmission service under its

Transmission Service Tariff.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Arizona Public Service Company

[Docket No. ER96–2205–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

Arizona Public Service Company (APS),

tendered for filing the following

Agreements:

1. Amendment No. 3 to the Navajo

Project Co-Tenancy Agreement

2. Amendment No. 4 to the Navajo

Project Southern Transmission System

Operating Agreement

As Operating Agent of the Navajo

Project Southern Transmission System,

APS has constructed the Yavapai 500

Kv Switchyard which will be

interconnected with, and become part

of, the Navajo Southern Transmission

System. These Amendments establish

interests of ownership in the Yavapai

500 Kv Switchyard as well as cost

responsibilities relating to initial

construction costs, capital

improvements and O&M costs related to

the Switchyard.

APS requests waiver of the

Commission’s Notice Requirements in

18 CFR 35.11 to allow for an effective

date of June 20, 1996.
35206 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 130 / Friday, July 5, 1996 / Notices

A copy of this filing has been served

on the Arizona Corporation

Commission, the Nevada Public Service

Commission, Salt River Project

Agricultural Improvement & Power

District, Tucson Electric Power

Company, the United States Bureau of

Reclamation, and Nevada Power

Company.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation

[Docket No. ER96–2206–000]

Take notice that on June 21, 1996,

New York State Electric & Gas

Corporation (NYSEG), tendered for

filing pursuant to § 35.12 of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR

35.12, as an initial rate schedule, an

agreement with Xenergy, Inc. (Xenergy)

for the sale of power at cost based rates

to Xenergy for resale to retail customers

participating in the New Hampshire

Retail Access Pilot Program and other

retail customers in the future. The

agreement provides a mechanism

pursuant to which the parties can enter

into separately scheduled transactions

under which NYSEG will sell to

Xenergy and Xenergy will purchase

from NYSEG either capacity and

associated energy or energy only as the

parties may mutually agree.

NYSEG requests that the agreement

become effective on June 22, 1996, so

that the parties may, if mutually

agreeable, enter into separately

scheduled transactions under the

agreement. NYSEG has requested waiver

of the notice requirements for good

cause shown.

NYSEG served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and Xenergy.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Carolina Power & Light Company

[Docket No. ER96–2207–000]

Take notice that on June 24, 1996,

Carolina Power & Light Company

(Carolina), tendered for filing separate

Service Agreements executed between

Carolina and the following Eligible

Entities: Duke/Louis Dreyfus L.L.C.,

Stand Energy Corporation, Federal

Energy Sales, Inc., DuPont Power

Marketing, Inc., South Carolina Public

Service Authority, Energy Transfer

Group, L.L.C.; Aquila Power

Corporation, Calpine Power Service

Company, Central Illinois Public

Service Company, AIG Trading

Corporation, North Carolina Electric

Membership Corporation, and Coral

Power, L.L.C. Service to each Eligible

Entity will be in accordance with the

terms and conditions of Carolina’s Tariff

No. 1 for Sales of Capacity and Energy.

Copies of the filing were served upon

the North Carolina Utilities Commission

and the South Carolina Public Service

Commission.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

13. Public Service Company of

Oklahoma

[Docket No. ER96–2208–000]

Take notice that on June 24, 1996,

Public Service Company of Oklahoma

(PSO), tendered for filing Amendment 3

to the Contract for Electric Service,

dated April 20, 1995, between PSO and

Northeast Oklahoma Electric

Cooperative, Inc. (NEO). Amendment 3

provides for an additional point of

delivery.

PSO seeks an effective date of June 25,

1996, and accordingly, seeks waiver of

the Commission’s notice requirements.

Copies of the filing were served on NEO

and the Oklahoma Corporation

Commission. Copies are also available

for public inspection at PSO’s offices in

Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

14. Commonwealth Electric Company

[Docket No. ER96–2209–000]

Take notice that on June 24, 1996,

Commonwealth Electric Company

(Commonwealth), tendered for filing a

non-firm transmission service

agreement between Commonwealth and

New England Power Company (NEP).

Commonwealth states that the service

agreement sets out the transmission

arrangements under which

Commonwealth will provide non-firm

transmission service to NEP under

Commonwealth’s FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 4, accepted for

filing in Docket No. ER94–1518–000.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

15. Houston Lighting & Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–2210–000]

Take notice that on June 24, 1996,

Houston Lighting & Power Company

(HL&P), tendered for filing an executed

transmission service agreement (TSA)

under HL&P’s FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1, for

Transmission Service To, From and

Over Certain HVDC Interconnections.

The filing consists of a TSA with West

Texas Utilities Company (WTU)

providing for firm power transmission

service over the North HVDC,

Interconnection. HL&P has requested a

waiver to permit an effective date of

June 12, 1996.

Copies of the filing were served on

WTU and the Public Utility Commission

of Texas.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

16. Houston Lighting & Power Company

[Docket No. ER96–2211–000]

Take notice that on June 24, 1996,

Houston Lighting & Power Company

(HL&P), tendered for filing an executed

transmission service agreement (TSA)

under HL&P’s FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 1, for

Transmission Service To, From and

Over Certain HVDC Interconnections.

The filing consists of an economy

energy and emergency power TSA with

Coastal Electric Services Company

(CESC) providing for the transmission of

energy to be scheduled over the East

HVDC Interconnection. HL&P has

requested an effective date of June 21,

1996.

Copies of the filing were served on

CESC and the Public Utility

Commission of Texas.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

17. Portland General Electric Company

[Docket No. ER96–2212–000]

Take notice that on June 24, 1996,

Portland General Electric Company

(PGE), tendered for filing under FERC

Electric Tariff, 1st Revised Volume No.

2, an executed Service Agreement

between PGE and Cinergy Services, Inc.

Pursuant to 18 CFR 35.11 and the

Commission’s order issued July 30, 1993

(Docket No. PL93–2–002). PGE

respectfully requests the Commission

grant a waiver of the notice

requirements of 18 CFR 35.3 to allow

the executed Service Agreement to

become effective June 1, 1996.

Copies of this filing were served upon

Cinergy Services, Inc.

Comment date: July 11, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph:

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 130 / Friday, July 5, 1996 / Notices 35207

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–17071 Filed 7–3–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

[Project No. 11437–001–NC]

Hydro Matrix Partnership, Ltd.; Notice

Ready for Environmental Analysis,

Notice Requesting Interventions,

Protests, and Comments, and Notice of

Scoping Pursuant to the National

Environmental Policy Act of 1969

June 28, 1996.

On June 21, 1996, the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (Commission)

issued a letter accepting Hydro Matrix

Partnership, Ltd.’s application for the

Jordan Hydroelectric Project located at

the U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers

Jordan Dam on the Haw River in

Chatham County, North Carolina.

The Jordan Hydroelectric Project’s

principal project features would consist

of 80 small turbine generator units

installed in two modules placed in slots

on the intake tower. Each generator

would have a rated capacity of 100 kW

for a total rated capacity of 8,000 kW.

The project would have an average

annual generation of 38 GWh. The

project site is owned by the U.S. Army

Corps of Engineers.

The purpose of this notice is to: (1)

Invite interventions and protests; (2)

advise all parties as to the proposed

scope of the staff’s environmental

analysis, including cumulative effects,

and to seek additional information

pertinent to this analysis; and (3) advise

all parties of their opportunity for

comment.

The application is ready for

environmental analysis at this time, and

the Commission is requesting

comments, reply comments,

recommendations, terms and

conditions, and prescriptions.

Interventions, Protests, and Comments

All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital

letters the title ‘‘PROTEST,’’ ‘‘MOTION

TO INTERVENE,’’ NOTICE OF INTENT

TO FILE COMPETING APPLICATION,’’

OR ‘‘COMPETING APPLICATION,’’

‘‘COMMENTS,’’ ‘‘REPLY COMMENTS,’’

‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS,’’ ‘‘TERMS

AND CONDITIONS,’’ OR

‘‘PRESCRIPTIONS;’’ (2) set forth in the

heading the name of the applicant and

the project number of the application to

which the filing responds; (3) furnish

the name, address, and telephone

number of the person protesting or

intervening; and (4) otherwise comply

with the requirements of 18 CFR

385.2001 through 385.2005. Agencies

may obtain copies of the application

directly from the applicant. Any of these

documents must be filed by providing

the original and the number of copies

required by the Commission’s

regulations to: Secretary, Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426.

An additional copy must be sent to:

Director, Division of Project Review,

Office of Hydropower Licensing,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

at the above address. A copy of any

protest or motion to intervene must be

served upon each representative of the

applicant specified in the particular

application.

All filings for any protest or motion to

intervene must be received 60 days from

the issuance date of this notice.

The Commission directs, pursuant to

section 4.34(b) of the regulations (see

order No. 533 issued May 8, 1991, 56 FR

23108 (May 20, 1991)), that all

comments, recommendations, terms and

conditions and prescriptions concerning

the application be filed with the

Commission within 60 days from the

issuance date of this notice. All reply

comments must be filed with the

Commission within 105 days from the

date of this notice.

Anyone may obtain an extension of

time for these deadlines from the

Commission only upon a showing of

good cause or extraordinary

circumstances in accordance with 18

CFR 385.2008.

Scoping Process

The Commission’s scoping objectives

are to:

• identify significant environmental

issues;

• determine the depth of analysis

appropriate to each issue;

• identify the resource issues not

requiring detailed analysis; and,

• identify reasonable project

alternatives.

The purpose of the scoping process is

to identify significant issues related to

the proposed action and to determine

what issues should be covered in the

environmental document pursuant to

the National Environmental Policy Act

of 1969. The document entitled

‘‘Scoping document I’’ (SDI) will be

circulated shortly to enable appropriate

federal, state, and local resource

agencies, developers, Indian tribes, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and

other interested parties to effectively

participate in and contribute to the

scoping process. SDI provides a brief

description of the proposed action,

project alternative, and the geographic

and temporal scope of a cumulative

effects analysis, and a list of preliminary

issues identified by staff.

The Commission will decide, based

on the application, and agency and

public comments to scoping, whether

licensing the Jordan Hydroelectric

Project constitutes a major federal action

significantly impacting the quality of

the human environment. The

Commission staff will not hold scoping

meetings unless the Commission

decides to prepare an environmental

impact statement, or the response to SDI

warrants holding such meetings.

Individuals, organizations, and

agencies with environmental expertise

and concerns are encouraged to

comment on SDI and assist the staff in

defining and clarifying the issues to be

addressed.

All filings should contain an original

and 8 copies. Failure to file an original

and 8 copies may result in appropriate

staff not receiving the benefit of your

comments in a timely manner. See 18

CFR 4.34(h). In addition, commentors

may submit a copy of their comments

on a 31⁄2-inch diskette formatted for

MS–DOS based computers. In light of

our ability to translate MS–DOS based

materials, the text need only be

submitted in the format and version that

it was generated (i.e., MS Word,

WordPerfect 5.1/5.2, ASCII, etc.). It is

not necessary to reformat word

processor generated text to ASCII. For

Macintosh users, it would be helpful to

save the documents in Macintosh word

processor format then write them to files

on a diskette formatted for MS–DOS

machines. All comments should be

submitted to the Office of the Secretary,

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC

20426, and should show the following

captions on the first page: Jordan

Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 11437–

001.

Further, interested persons are

reminded of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedures, requiring