alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

I, Byung Yim, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of TRB Systems
     International, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
     to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
     such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
     covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
     cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
     this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
     have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
         those entities, particularly during the period in which this
         annual report is being prepared;

    b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
         of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
         our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
     audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
     performing the equivalent functions):

     a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses
         in internal controls; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
     or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
     subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.



Date: October 8, 2003


 /s/ Byung Yim
 --------------------------------
Byung Yim, Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief Financial Officer
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 1 of 23 Pg ID 15
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 2 of 23 Pg ID 16
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 3 of 23 Pg ID 17
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 4 of 23 Pg ID 18
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 5 of 23 Pg ID 19
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 6 of 23 Pg ID 20
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 7 of 23 Pg ID 21
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 8 of 23 Pg ID 22
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 9 of 23 Pg ID 23
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 10 of 23 Pg ID 24
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 11 of 23 Pg ID 25
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 12 of 23 Pg ID 26
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 13 of 23 Pg ID 27
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 14 of 23 Pg ID 28
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 15 of 23 Pg ID 29
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 16 of 23 Pg ID 30
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 17 of 23 Pg ID 31
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 18 of 23 Pg ID 32
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 19 of 23 Pg ID 33
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 20 of 23 Pg ID 34
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 21 of 23 Pg ID 35
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 22 of 23 Pg ID 36
2:08-cv-14532-DPH-MJH Doc # 5 Filed 01/12/09 Pg 23 of 23 Pg ID 37
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Name of SEP: Pathways--Full Scale Study (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Date: July 18, 1996.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Place: Two Rockledge Center, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Rm. 7220, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Contact Person: C. James Scheirer, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7220, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0266.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to this 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Name of SEP: Regulation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the 
Lung.
    Date: July 22-23, 1996.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.
    Contact Person: Deborah P. Beebe, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7206, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0303.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: June 24, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-16718 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Opinion issued September 21, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 2 3
- 00 388
- CR

——————————— JAMES CARABALLO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No . 1649354

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, James Caraballo , appealed the trial court’s Ma y 17 , 202 3 final judgment. On September 5 , 2023, appellant ’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stat ing that appellant had provided “explicit, written permission to dismiss [] his appeal, ” and request ing that “this Court dismiss the appeal.”2

Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion, and this Court has n ot
issued a decision. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.2(a). Further, more than ten days have passed , and the State has not expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Farris. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
Supplementary Agreement to the Amended
and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement


 


 


Pledgee: Beijing Dangdang Information Technology Co.,
Ltd.


 


Pledgor:     Name: Peggy
Yu YU, ID Card No.: ***


Name: Guoqing LI, ID Card No.:
***


 


(Peggy Yu YU and Guoqing LI collectively as "Pledgors")


 


On 1st August 2013, Pledgee and Pledgors reached
the supplementary agreement to the Amended and Restated Equity Pledge Agreement ("Original Agreement") upon mutual consultation,
in Beijing China as follows:


 


		1.	The third sub-section of the recital (i.e. Whereas (3)) of Original Agreement modified as:



 


(3) For the Pledgee's business operations and commercial
arrangements, as well as the establishment and development of Dangdang Kewen, Pledgors will take out loans from Pledgee from time
to time. Pledgor and Pledgee entered into a Loan Agreement ("Loan Agreement") on 19th June 2006. According
to Loan Agreement, Pledgee may make a loan in the aggregate amount of RMB2,000,000 to Pledgors, and Pledgee may increase the amount
of the loan to Pledgors depending on Dangdang Kewen's business status. As of the date hereof, the aggregate amount of the loan
is RMB20,000,000. Pledgee and Pledgors entered into the supplementary agreement to the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement as of
the date hereof.


 


		2.	Other provisions in Original Agreement shall be performed as set forth originally. This agreement has three (3) counterparts
and each party holds one (1) counterpart.



 





[The remainder of this page is intentionally
left blank]


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed on the date and
at the place first written above herein.


 


Pledgee: Beijing Dangdang Information Technology Co.,
Ltd.


Authorized Representative: /s/ Guoqing Li


Company seal:


 


 


Pledgor:      Peggy Yu
YU


 


/s/ Peggy Yu Yu


 


 


Guoqing LI,


 


/s/ Guoqing Li
2:08-cv-14963-GER-MJH Doc # 3 Filed 01/06/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 20
2:08-cv-14963-GER-MJH Doc # 3 Filed 01/06/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 21
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 17, 2010 | /s/ Qingqing Wu                    |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Qingqing      Wu                   |   |
|                    | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
|                    | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

----
### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MIGUEL ANGEL CONTRERAS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00973

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_ _______________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order app ellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-91570 and No. 333-61874) and theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-100843, No. 333-83506, No. 333-60156, No. 333-49032, 333-42844, 333-34502 and No. 333-110743) of Chordiant Software, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2004 relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2). 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

San Jose,California 

April 26, 2004
#### Justin WRIGHT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 70014.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 26, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1997.

Application to Transfer Denied March 26, 1997.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit P 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-14 Filed 04/25/18 Page 1 of 3
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-11 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 2 of 3 PageID #: 201 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-14 Filed 04/25/18 Page 2 of 3
Case: 4:17-cv-01951-PLC Doc. #: 14-11 Filed: 07/27/17 Page: 3 of 3 PageID #: 202 Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 118-14 Filed 04/25/18 Page 3 of 3
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ALBERTO RAMIREZ BENITEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73240

Agency No. A027-702-700

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Alberto Ramirez Benitez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings conducted in absentia. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

FILED

SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73240

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ramirez Benitez’s motion

to reopen as untimely where Ramirez Benitez filed the motion almost six years

after the in absentia order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii), and Ramirez Benitez

did not establish that he was entitled to equitable tolling of the 180-day deadline,

see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897 (equitable tolling available to a petitioner who is

prevented from filing due to deception, fraud or error, and exercises due diligence

in discovering such circumstances).

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s decision not to invoke its sua

sponte authority to reopen proceedings. See Ekimian v. INS, 303 F.3d 1153, 1159

(9th Cir. 2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
A0435 .. Administrative-•.Ofiice.Q:f·tbe United tates Courts FOR COURT U E ONLY 

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018) D EDATE: 

TRA SCRIPT ORDER 

I. AME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE 

David M Morgan 520-236-4051 09/16/2021

4.FIRMNAME 

Cochise Countv Record 

5. MAfUNG ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 18. ZIP CODE 

PO Box 1218 Bisbee AZ 85603

9. CASE NUMBER I

IO.JUDGE DA TES OF PROCEEDINGS 

2:18-cr-00422 Brnovich 11. 09/14/2021 12. 

13. A ENAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS 

USA v Lacey, Michael et al 14. Phoenix 15. STATE AZ 

16. ORDER FOR 

0 APPEAL 0 CRIMJ AL 0 CRIMJNAL JUSTICE ACT 0 BA KRUPT Y 

0 NON-APPEAL 0 CIVIL 0 IN FORMA PAUPER!$ li2'.I OTHER (Specify) 

17. TRA SCRJ PT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.) 

PORTIONS OATHS) 

□ VOIRDIRE 

□ OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintifl) 

□ OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant) 

□ CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintifl) 

□ CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant) 

□ OPINION OF COURT 

□ JURY INSTRUCTIONS 

□ SENTENCING 

□ BAIL HEARING 

18. ORDER 

ORIGINAL+ I HRST #OF 

ATEGORY (original to Court, ADDITIONAL COPY cony to ordering •>artv) COPIES

30DAY □ □ 

l4DAY □ 0 

7 DA YS(cxpcditcd) □ □ 

3DAYS □ □ 

DAILY □ □ 

HOURLY □ □ 

REAJ.J"flME_ □ □ 

c ilrirrcA no ('t9. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges 

(deposit plus additional), 

19· SIGNATURE David M Mori:ian 

20· DATE 09/16/2021

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY 

ORDER RECEfVED 

DEPO IT PAID 

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED 

TRA SCRJPT RECEIVED 

ORDERJNG PARTY NOTIFIED 

TO PICK UP TRANSCRJPT 

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT 

DATE BY 

PORTION($) DATE($) 

0 TESTIMONY (Specify) 

□ PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING 

0 OTHER { pecify) 

Order Granting Mistrial 09/14/2021

Comments to Jurv, Release 09/14/2021 

DELIVERY INSTR CTIO 

(Check all that apply.) E TIMATED 0 T 

□ PAPER OPY 

0 PDF ( e-mail) 

□ A CII (e-mail) 

E-MAIL ADORE 

Editor.SVDR@gmail.com

OTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN 0 EFORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL CHARGE.

ESTIMATE TOTAL 

PRO E EDBY PHO MBER 

DEPOSIT PAID 

TOTALCHARG 

LESS DEPOSIT 

TOTAL REF OED 

TOTAL DUE 

DI "TRlBUTIO OURTCOPY TRAN CRIPTJO COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER OPY 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1320 Filed 09/16/21 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donald J. Girskis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ShoreTel, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.

Date: November 5, 2010



By:

/s/ Donald J. GirskisName:

Donald J. GirskisTitle:

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies this Report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenced into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made on or before or after the date of this Report), irrespective at any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 35079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17241]



[[Page 35077]]


_______________________________________________________________________

Part IX





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Presidential Determination No. 96-36--Delegation of Authority To 
Identify Germany Under Title VII and Modify or Restrict Title VII Trade 
Action Taken Against Germany


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 3, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 35079]]

                 Presidential Determination No. 96-36 of June 28, 1996

                
 Delegation of Authority To Identify Germany 
                Under Title VII and Modify or Restrict Title VII Trade 
                Action Taken Against Germany

                Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

                By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and 
                the laws of the United States, including section 301 of 
                title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to the 
                United States Trade Representative the powers granted 
                the President:

                    (1) in section 305(g)(1)(A) of the Trade Agreements 
                Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2515(g)(1)(A) (the 
                ``Act'')), to formally identify Germany as a country 
                that discriminates against U.S. products or services in 
                government procurement of heavy electrical equipment; 
                and
                    (2) in section 305(g)(2) of the Act to impose, 
                modify, or restrict sanctions in response to the 
                discrimination so identified.You are authorized and 
                directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 28, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-17241
Filed 7-2-96; 11:40 am]
Billing code 3190-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID M. ZOLMAN,

Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

08-CV-14704

vs.

HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is presently before the court on cross motions for summary judgment.

Magistrate Judge Virginia Morgan has submitted a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in which

she recommends that defendant’s motion be denied, plaintiff’s motion be granted, and the matter

be remanded for an award of benefits. Neither party has filed objections to the R&R and the

deadline for doing so has expired. Having reviewed the motions, the administrative record, and the

R&R, the court is persuaded that the magistrate judge’s analysis and recommendation are correct.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Morgan’s Report and Recommendation is

hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is

denied.

2:08-cv-14704-BAF-VMM Doc # 13 Filed 11/18/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 298
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is

granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded to defendant for an award

of benefits.

S/Bernard A. Friedman__________________

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: November 18, 2009

Detroit, Michigan

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on

November 18, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/Carol Mullins 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14704-BAF-VMM Doc # 13 Filed 11/18/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 299