Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 3, 1996 / Proposed Rules 34769

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

removing amendment 39–5908 (53 FR

15363, April 29, 1988), and by adding

a new airworthiness directive (AD), to

read as follows:

De Havilland, Inc.: Docket 95–NM–266–AD.

Revises AD 88–09–05, Amendment 39–

5908.

Applicability: Model DHC–8 series

airplanes, serial numbers 3 through 79,

inclusive; on which Modification 8/0757 has

not been installed; certificated in any

category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

modified, altered, or repaired in the area

subject to the requirements of this AD. For

airplanes that have been modified, altered, or

repaired so that the performance of the

requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent inadvertent opening of the

airstair door and consequent

depressurization of the airplane, accomplish

the following:

(a) Within 60 days after June 10, 1988 (the

effective date of AD 88–09–05, amendment

39–5908), replace the labels marking the

location and means of opening the lavatory,

in accordance with the Accomplishment

Instructions of de Havilland Service Bulletin

8–11–14, Revision ‘A’, dated July 31, 1987.

Note 2: Replacement accomplished in

accordance with de Havilland Service

Bulletin 8–11–14, Revision ‘B’, dated July 1,

1988, or Revision ‘C’, dated September 29,

1995, is considered acceptable for

compliance with this paragraph.

(b) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, New York

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,

Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, New York ACO.

Note 3: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the New York ACO.

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 27,

1996.

S. R. Miller,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 96–16952 Filed 7–2–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96–AGL–11]

Establishment of Class E Airspace;

Miller, SD

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to

establish Class E airspace at Miller

Municipal Airport, Miller, SD, to

accommodate a Nondirectional Radio

Beacon (NDB) to serve Runway 15.

Controlled airspace extending upward

from 700 to 1200 feet above ground

level (AGL) is needed to contain aircraft

executing the approach. The intended

effect of this proposal is to provide

segregation of aircraft using instrument

approach procedures in instrument

conditions from other aircraft operating

in visual weather conditions.

DATES: Comments must be received on

or before August 5, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the

proposal in triplicate to: Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of the

Assistant Chief Counsel, AGL–7, Rules

Docket No. 96–AGL–11, 2300 East

Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois

60018.

The official docket may be examined

in the Office of the Assistant Chief

Counsel, Federal Aviation

Administration, 2300 East Devon

Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois. An

informal docket may also be examined

during normal business hours at the Air

Traffic Division, Operations Branch,

Federal Aviation Administration, 2300

East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines,

Illinois.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John

A. Clayborn, Air Traffic Division,

Operations Branch, AGL–530, Federal

Aviation Administration, 2300 East

Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois

60018, telephone (847) 294–7568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

Interested parties are invited to

participate in this proposed rulemaking

by submitting such written data, views,

or arguments as they may desire.

Comments that provide the factual basis

supporting the views and suggestions

presented are particularly helpful in

developing reasoned regulatory

decisions on the proposal. Comments

are specifically invited on the overall

regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related

aspects of the proposal.

Communications should identify the

airspace docket number and be

submitted in triplicate to the address

listed above. Commenters wishing the

FAA to acknowledge receipt of their

comments on this notice must submit

with those comments a self-addressed,

stamped postcard on which the

following statement is made:

‘‘Comments to Airspace Docket No. 96–

AGL–11.’’ The postcard will be date/

time stamped and returned to the

commenter. All communications

received on or before the specified

closing date for comments will be

considered before taking action on the

proposed rule. The proposal contained

in this notice may be changed in light

of comments received. All comments

submitted will be available for

examination in the Rules Docket, FAA,

Great Lakes Region, Office of the

Assistant Chief Counsel, 2300 East

Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, Illinois,

both before and after the closing date for

comments. A report summarizing each

substantive public contact with FAA

personnel concerned with this

rulemaking will be filed in the docket.

Availability of NPRM’s

Any person may obtain a copy of the

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

by submitting a request to the Federal

Aviation Administration, Office of

Public Affairs, Attention: Public Inquiry

Center, APA–230, 800 Independence

Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20591,

or by calling (202) 267–3484.

Communications must identify the

notice number of this NPRM. Persons

interested in being placed on a mailing

list for future NPRM’s should also

request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11–2A, which describes the application

procedure.

The Proposal

The FAA is considering an

amendment to part 71 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 71) to

establish Class E airspace at Miller

Municipal Airport, Miller, SD to

accommodate a Nondirectional Radio

Beacon to serve Runway 15. Controlled

airspace extending upward from 700 to

1200 feet AGL is needed to contain

aircraft executing the approach. The

intended affect of this action is to

provide segregation of aircraft using

instrument approach procedures in

instrument conditions from other
34770 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 129 / Wednesday, July 3, 1996 / Proposed Rules

aircraft operating in visual weather

conditions. The area would be depicted

on appropriate aeronautical charts

thereby enabling pilots to

circumnavigate the area or otherwise

comply with IFR procedures. Class E

airspace designations for airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth are

published in paragraph 6005 of FAA

Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995,

and effective September 16, 1995, which

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class E airspace designation

listed in this document would be

published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this

proposed regulation only involves an

established body of technical

regulations for which frequent and

routine amendments are necessary to

keep them operationally current.

Therefore this, proposed regulation—(1)

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this proposed rule will

not have a significant economic impact

on a substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, the Federal

Aviation Administration proposes to

amend part 71 of the Federal Aviation

Regulations (14 CFR part 71) as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005 The Class E airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AGL SD E5 Miller, SD [New]

Miller Municipal Airport, SD

(Lat. 44°31′31′′N, long. 98°57′29′′)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile

radius of the Miller Municipal Airport and

that airspace extending upward from 1,200

feet above the surface bounded on the west

and northwest by V–263, on the south by V–

120, and on the east by V–15 excluding the

Aberdeen, SD; the Pierre, SD; the Mitchell,

SD; and the Huron, SD, 1,200 foot Class E

airspace areas and all federal airways.

* * * * *

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on June 17,

1996.

Maureen Woods,

Manager, Air Traffic Division.

[FR Doc. 96–17041 Filed 7–2–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Juvenile Justice and

Delinquency Prevention

28 CFR Part 31

[OJP No. 1091]

RIN 1121–AA39

OJJDP Formula Grants Regulation

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs,

Office of Juvenile Justice and

Delinquency Prevention.

ACTION: Proposed rule and request for

public comment.

SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice

and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is

publishing for public comment

proposed amendments to its Formula

Grants Regulation, 28 CFR Part 31. The

Formula Grants Regulation implements

Part B of Title II of the Juvenile Justice

and Delinquency Prevention (JJDP) Act

of 1974, as amended by the Juvenile

Justice and Delinquency Prevention

Amendments of 1992. The proposed

amendments to the existing Regulation

provide further clarification and

guidance to States in the formulation,

submission and implementation of State

Formula Grant plans and

determinations of State compliance with

plan requirements. They are intended to

provide additional flexibility and

greater clarity to participating States

with respect to key provisions related to

the core requirements of the JJDP Act.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to

submit written comments which must

be received on or before August 19,

1996.

ADDRESSES: Address all comments to

Mr. Shay Bilchik, Administrator, Office

of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency

Prevention, 633 Indiana Avenue NW.,

Room 742, Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

Roberta Dorn, Director, State Relations

and Assistance Division, Office of

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency

Prevention, 633 Indiana Avenue NW.,

Room 543, Washington, DC 20531; (202)

307–5924.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office

of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency

Prevention is proposing revisions to the

existing Regulation, codified at 28 CFR

Part 31, and inviting public comment on

the proposed changes. The proposed

changes in the regulatory text

accomplish the following:

(1) Revise § 31.303(d)(1)(i) to clarify the

level of contact that is prohibited between

juveniles in a secure custody status within an

institution and incarcerated adults;

(2) Revise § 31.303(d)(1)(i) by providing an

exception to the core requirement of

separation with respect to brief, and

inadvertent contact between juveniles in a

secure custody status within an institution

and incarcerated adults in nonresidential

areas;

(3) Revise § 31.303(d)(1)(v) to permit the

placement of an adjudicated delinquent in an

institution with adults once the adjudicated

delinquent reaches the State’s age of full

criminal responsibility, when authorized by

State law;

(4) Revise § 31.303(e)(2) to permit the

placement of an accused or adjudicated

delinquent juvenile in an adult jail or lockup

for up to six hours immediately before or

after a court appearance for processing and

transportation purposes;

(5) Revise § 31.303(e)(3) by eliminating the

requirement for OJJDP concurrence in State

approved collocated juvenile facilities, the

requirement that a needs-based analysis

precede a jurisdiction’s request for State

approval, and to permit time-phased use of

nonresidential areas of collocated facilities;

(6) Revise § 31.303(f)(2) to expressly

provide that accused status offenders can be

placed in a secure juvenile detention facility

for up to twenty-four hours, exclusive of

weekends and holidays, prior to an initial

court appearance and up to twenty-four

hours, exclusive of weekends and holidays,

following an initial court appearance;

(7) Revise § 31.303(f)(3)(vi) to eliminate the

regulatory recommendation that a multi

disciplinary team may be used to satisfy the

‘‘public agency’’ requirement, under the valid

court order exception even if some members

represent court or law enforcement agencies;

(8) Revise § 31.303(f)(4)(vi) to eliminate the

requirement that States document and

describe in their annual monitoring report to

OJJDP the specific circumstances

surrounding each use of distance/ground

transportation and weather exceptions to the

jail and lockup removal requirement;

(9) Revise § 31.303(f)(5)(i)(C) to define and

clarify the scope of the exception to the

deinstitutionalization of status offenders

requirement for offenses under ‘‘§ 922(x) of

Title 18 or other similar State law’’ (relating

to possession of handguns by juveniles);