alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered June 14, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00969-CV

BRIGETTA D'OLIVIO A/K/A BRIGETTA ALIX ANDERSON, ALIX 

BRIGETTA, Appellant

V.

HILARY THOMPSON HUTSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-04855-2019

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal which we abated to allow the trial court an 

opportunity to conduct a hearing to resolve issues concerning the payment, 

accuracy, and completeness of the clerk’s record. The hearing has been held, and 

the parties have entered into an agreement in lieu of written findings from the trial 

court. The agreement has been filed with the Court.

The parties agree as follows:
(1) the total cost for the clerk’s record based on what has been 

requested is $1,014.00;

(2) appellant owes $439.00 for the supplemental clerk’s record and 

will make that payment within forty-eight hours of 1:00 on June 9, 

2021;

(3) the documents to be included in the supplemental clerk’s record 

constitute 439 pages and include the following:

i. defendant’s September 28, 2020 reply to plaintiff’s 

response to motion for reconsideration, to set aside, and to 

dismiss, and accompanying certificate of service, filed 

October 1, 2020;

ii. defendant’s October 2, 2020 supplemental reply to 

plaintiff’s response to motion for reconsideration, to set aside, 

and to dismiss, and accompanying certificate of service, filed 

October 5, 2020;

iii. plaintiff’s October 13, 2020 response to supplemental 

reply, filed October 9, 2020;

iv. defendant’s October 13, 2020 reply to plaintiff’s 

response to supplemental reply, and accompanying certificate 

of service, filed October 14, 2020;

v. plaintiff’s request for designation of additional items 

for clerk’s record filed January 5, 2021; and

vi. cover sheet, index, caption, cost bill and certification;

and,

(4) appellant withdrew her concerns/objections about the accuracy of 

the final order included in the record and agrees that it is an accurate 

reflection of the final order.
We note the trial court’s online docket sheet reflects appellant tendered 

payment of $439.00 on June 11, 2021. Accordingly, based on the parties’

agreement, we ORDER Collin County District Clerk Lynne Finley to file, no later 

than June 21, 2021, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the above-listed

items. We further ORDER appellant to file her brief on the merits within thirty 

days of the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Finley and the parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3629 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3629

  To amend title 39, United States Code, to require that photographic 
evidence of a person's identity be presented before a change-of-address 
    order shall be accepted by the United States Postal Service for 
                              processing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 1996

  Mr. Vento introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 39, United States Code, to require that photographic 
evidence of a person's identity be presented before a change-of-address 
    order shall be accepted by the United States Postal Service for 
                              processing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mail Fraud Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY REQUIRED.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 4 of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 414. Change-of-address orders
    ``(a) Except as provided under subsection (b), a change-of-address 
order sought to be submitted by or on behalf of any person shall not be 
accepted by the Postal Service unless appropriate photographic evidence 
of such person's identity is presented at the time of such order's 
submission.
    ``(b) Regulations to carry out this section shall take effect not 
later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this section. 
The regulations--
            ``(1) shall include provisions under which--
                    ``(A) the requirements of subsection (a) may be 
                waived in the case of persons who are homebound; and
                    ``(B) alternative measures shall be implemented to 
                carry out the purposes of this section with respect to 
                persons as to whom any waiver under subparagraph (A) 
                applies; and
            ``(2) may provide for such other exclusions or 
        modifications as the Postal Service considers appropriate, 
        consistent with the purposes of this section and considerations 
        of practicability.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The analysis for chapter 4 of title 39, 
United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

``414. Change-of-address orders.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1758

TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec)

Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order

dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Jack v. Stubblefield , No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec

(W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sawadee Ventures (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rachna Khanna,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Rachna Khanna
-------------------------------
Rachna Khanna
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2009

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Unassociated Document


EXHIBIT 10.1


AMENDMENT


TO


DEBT EXCHANGE AGREEMENT







This Amendment is dated as of March 31, 2014 by and between Powin Corporation (“Powin”),  Joseph Lu (“Lu”) and 3U(HK) Trading Co. Limited (“3HK).







Recitals







A.           Lu and 3HK each entered into a Debt Exchange Agreement with Powin effective December 31, 2013 (“Exchange Agreement”) pursuant to which Lu and 3HK each exchanged the principal and accrued interest balance of their respect Promissory Note (“ Powin Note(s)”) from Powin for shares of Powin’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.







B.           Lu, 3HK and Powin have now determined that the Exchange Agreement was entered into on the basis of a mutual mistake of law which has created unintended tax and other consequences to each of them which were not contemplated at the time of the execution of the Exchange Agreement.







C.           Lu, 3HK and Powin desire to amend the Exchange Agreement to correctly reflect their mutual original intentions.







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration and the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:







1.           The Exchange Agreement is hereby revoked, cancelled and declared null and void and of no further force and affect  with respect to the exchange of the Powin Notes for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock referred to therein.







2.           The Powin Notes for the aggregate principal and interest in the amount of $4,000,000 plus interest due June 30, 2015 are hereby reinstated with their original terms and conditions, including a maturity date of  June  30, 2015.







3.           This Amendment is to be construed and enforced in accordance with and shall be governed  by the laws of the State of Oregon applicable to contracts executed in and to be fully performed in Oregon.









  





  











  






 


4.           This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall constitute an original and together shall constitute one Agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.








	  	
POWIN CORPORATION


	  	  
	  	
By: /s/ Jeffrey Grumbling


	  	
Jeffrey Grumbling, President


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Joseph Lu


	  	
JOSEPH LU


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
3U(HK) TRADING CO. LIMITED


	  	  
	  	
By:/s/ Xi Long Zhu


	  	
Name:  Xi Long Zhu


	  	
Title: President
2:08-cv-14344-PDB-MKM Doc # 181 Filed 07/08/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 2514
2:08-cv-14344-PDB-MKM Doc # 181 Filed 07/08/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 2515
Exhibit 10.32



 Exhibit 10.32 
 AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS 
 This
Amendment to Stock Option Agreements (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 17th day of February, 2009, by and between FEDERAL
REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST, a Maryland real estate investment trust (“Trust”), and ANDREW P. BLOCHER (“Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, Executive and the Trust have entered into the following stock option agreements: (a) Combined Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated February 16, 2006; (b) Combined Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock
Option Agreement dated February 12, 2007; and (c) Combined Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated February 10, 2008 (collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Stock Option Agreements”); and 

WHEREAS, since the execution of the Option Agreements, Executive has been promoted and is now an executive officer of the Trust, and Executive and the
Trust wish to amend the Stock Option Agreements. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises herein contained
and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 
 1.      Sections 2(d), 2(f) and 2(g) of each of the Stock Option Agreements are hereby amended by deleting the phrase
“three (3) months” and replacing it with the phrase “one (1) year.” 
 2.      Capitalized terms used in this Amendment, unless otherwise defined herein, have the respective meanings given to such terms in the Stock Option Agreements. 
 3.      Except as specifically modified hereby, the Stock Option Agreements remain in full force and effect, and the Trust
and Executive hereby ratify and reaffirm each and all of the terms and provisions of the Stock Option Agreements as modified hereby. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment to be effective as of the day and year indicated above. 
  

			
	FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
		
	By:	 	/s/    Dawn M. Becker
	 Name:
 Title:
	 	 Dawn M. Becker
 Executive Vice President-General
Counsel and Secretary



  
  
  
  

			
	WITNESS:	 	EXECUTIVE
		
	 /s/    Darlene M. Hough
	 	 /s/    Andrew P. Blocher

		 	 Andrew P. Blocher
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1112 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1112

To make effective the proposed rule of the Food and Drug Administration 
      relating to sunscreen drug products, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2009

  Mr. Dodd (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make effective the proposed rule of the Food and Drug Administration 
      relating to sunscreen drug products, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sunscreen Labeling Protection Act of 
2009'' or the ``SUN Act''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR RULE RELATING TO SUNSCREEN DRUG PRODUCTS FOR 
              OVER-THE-COUNTER HUMAN USE.

    Notwithstanding subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 
5, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Administrative Procedure 
Act'') and any other provision of law, the proposed rule issued by the 
Commissioner of Food and Drugs entitled ``Sunscreen Drug Products for 
Over-the-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amendment of Final Monograph'', 72 
Fed. Reg. 49070 (August 27, 2007), shall take effect on the date that 
is 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, unless such 
Commissioner issues the final rule, which includes formulation, 
labeling, and testing requirements for both ultraviolet B (UVB) and 
ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation protection, before such effective date.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 15, 2002 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of HBOA Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December
21, 2000 (Registration No. 333-52424) and the Company's Post-Effective No. 1 to
its Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 14, 2000 (Registration
No. 333-50076).

/s/ Sewell & Company, PA
------------------------

Hollywood, Florida
April 29, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated February 11, 2000 on the financial statements of
ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc. and Subsidiaries and the related financial statement
schedule, included in this Form 10-K, into ITC/\DeltaCom, Inc.'s previously
filed Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-42785, No. 333-62773 and
No. 333-85627 and Form S-3, File No. 333-75635 and No. 333-84661.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15606]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: June 24, 1996 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agenda for future meeting
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Inv. No. 731-TA-748 (Preliminary) (Engineered Process Gas Turbo-
Compressor Systems from Japan)--briefing and vote.
5. Outstanding action jackets: none

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: June 14, 1996.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15606 Filed 6-14-96; 3:26 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                          10,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                       193
<INVENTORY>                                     38,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,043
<PP&E>                                          71,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,815
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,827
<BONDS>                                        136,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,922)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,405
<SALES>                                        136,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,009
<CGS>                                           97,223
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,292)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    625
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Order filed October 8, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00487-CV

____________

RACHEL JACO, Appellant

V.

MAXINE TRAYLOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0087007

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due September 7, 2020. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before November 9, 2020, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Bourliot.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Cornelius Hofman, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Way Cool Imports, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 15, 2011  /s/ Cornelius Hofman Cornelius Hofman President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Way Cool Imports, Inc. and will be retained by Way Cool Imports, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.