alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2008 (the Report), I, James H. Brennan, Vice President Financial Operations of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                                    
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|April 30, 2008 |  | /s/ James H. Brennan               
|               |  | James H. Brennan                   
|               |  | Vice President Financial Operations
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Tallen Marce’ Fleming, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-14416

United States Department of Justice, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER

Acting pro se, Plaintiff Tallen Marce’ Fleming, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on October 17,

2008. On May 1, 2009, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss, wherein it asserts that this Court

should dismiss this action pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction or, alternatively, dismiss this action pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to

state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

On May 11, 2009, Plaintiff filed a written response to the Motion to Dismiss wherein he 

states that he does not contest Defendant’s objection that this Court lacks subject matter

jurisdiction. Plaintiff further states that this case “should be closed with prejudice.” (Docket

Entry No. 21).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: August 17, 2009

2:08-cv-14416-SFC-VMM Doc # 22 Filed 08/17/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 233
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

Tallen Marce’ Fleming, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-14416

United States Department of Justice, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendant.

___________________________________/

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 17, 2009, a copy of the foregoing document was served 

upon counsel of record by electronic means and by First Class Mail upon:

Tallen Marce' Fleming, Jr 

660 Seward 

Apartment 212 

Detroit, MI 48202 

s/ J. Hernandez 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14416-SFC-VMM Doc # 22 Filed 08/17/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 234
1 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation

of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms

and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

2 Honorable Nathaniel R. Jones, Senior Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals

for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 5/17/96

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DEANNA ROSENBUSCH, formerly

known as Deanna Swift,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

MICHELLE MADDUX,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUTHERN PACIFIC

TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, doing

business as Southern Pacific Railroad,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-1204

(D.C. No. 94-M-815)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT1

Before PORFILIO, JONES,2 and TACHA, Circuit Judges.
2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal.

See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted

without oral argument.

Plaintiff-appellant Deanna Rosenbusch appeals the district court’s decision granting

defendant summary judgment on her claims asserted under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to

2000e-17, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging defendant failed to promote her because of her

race. This court reviews a summary judgment decision de novo, viewing the record in the

light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Carl v. City of Overland Park, 65 F.3d 866, 868

(10th Cir. 1995). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuinely disputed

issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 56(c). 

The district court determined that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of race

discrimination in defendant’s refusal to promote her because she was unable to show that she

was qualified for the supervisory positions for which she applied. Further, even if plaintiff

had established a prima facie case, the district court determined that she failed to present any

evidence tending to establish that defendant’s nondiscriminatory reasons for refusing to

promote her, her absenteeism and the fact that the other applicants were better qualified, were

pretextual. See generally Reynolds v. School Dist. No. 1, 69 F.3d 1523, 1532, 1533-34 (10th
3

Cir. 1995)(describing appropriate analysis for summary judgment motion on Title VII and

§ 1981 race discrimination claims for failure to promote, based upon circumstantial proof).

Upon careful consideration of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we must

agree. Finding no reversible legal error, we, therefore, AFFIRM the district court’s decision.

 The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio 

Circuit Judge
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15822]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

    Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a list of information collection 
requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these documents, call 
the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (301)443-0525.
    Drug And Alcohol Services Information System--Reinstatement with 
change--The DASIS consists of three related data systems: the National 
Facility Register, the Uniform Facility Data Set, and the Treatment 
Episode Data Set. Together, they provide information on the location, 
scope and characteristics of all known drug and alcohol treatment and 
prevention facilities in the United States, and the characteristics of 
clients receiving services. This information is needed to assess the 
nature and extent of these resources, to identify gaps in services, and 
to provide a database for treatment referrals. The total annual burden 
estimate is 13,993 hours, as shown below:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of    Average burden                
                                                     Number of     responses per   per response    Total burden 
                                                    respondents     respondent        (hours)         (hours)   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
States..........................................              56             164           0.075             687
Facilities......................................          19,748               1           0.674          13,306
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed 
information collection should be sent within 30 days of this notice to: 
Virginia Huth, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management 
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10236, Washington, DC 
20503.

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
Richard Kopanda,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 96-15822 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgette Mathers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





EXCLUSIVE APPAREL, INC.





Dated: August 4, 2011








By: /s/ Georgette Mathers


Georgette Mathers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Exclusive Apparel, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT FOX, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. 08-cv-14727

vs. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

PENNY RODGERS, et al.,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on June 25, 2010 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

United States District Chief Judge

This prisoner civil rights action having come before the Court on the June 8, 2010

Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub,

recommending that the Court grant Defendant Karen Ibarra’s Motion for Summary

Judgment; and no timely objections to the Report and Recommendation having been

filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s R&R, and the entire record

of this matter, and having concluded that Defendant Ibarra’s motion for summary

judgment should be granted,

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation of June 8, 2010 Dkt. # 96] is adopted by the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Karen Ibarra’s Motion for Summary

Judgment [Dkt. # 93] is GRANTED.

Defendant Ibarra being the last defendant remaining in this action,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED, in its

entirety, WITH PREJUDICE.

Let Judgment be entered accordingly.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: June 25, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on June 25, 2010, by electronic mail and upon Robert Fox, Jr., #208615, Parr Highway

Correctional Facility, 2727 East Beecher Street, Adrian, Michigan 49221 (Last known

address for plaintiff).

s/Ruth A. Gunther 

Case Manager
Exhibit
10.38
 RCN CORPORATION  Restricted Stock Unit Award
 Company Participant Committee Plan
 RSU Award RSUs Time-Based Awards Performance-Based RSUs Appendix A Determination Date i e
 Vesting Requirements Appendix A
 June 10, 2010:
    
    1/3 of AwardJune 10, 2011:
    
    1/3 of AwardJune 10, 2012:
    
    1/3 of Award




---



##### 



Accelerated Vesting
  Dividend Equivalents Dividend Equivalents
 Payment of Award
 Section 409A Compliance
  2




---



##### 



Restrictions on Transfer
 No Voting Rights
 Award Subject to Plans
 Changes for Corporate Events
 Governing Law
 RCN CORPORATIONBy:Name:Title:PARTICIPANT  3
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[MT-070-96-1430-01; MTM-83735]


Notice of Realty Action; Proposed Sale of Public Land; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following land has been found suitable for direct sale 
under Section 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 
(90 Stat. 2750, U.S.C. 1713), at not less than estimated fair market 
value. The land will not be offered for sale until at least 60 days 
after the date of this notice.

Principle Meridian, Montana

T. 7 N., R. 13 W.
Sec. 30, Lot 23.

    Containing approximately 1.99 acres.

    This land is being offered by direct sale to David Harris, 
Philipsburg, MT, and will resolve a long standing inadvertent 
unauthorized occupancy of the land. It has been determined that the 
reservation of minerals is interfering with appropriate nonmineral 
development of the lands; therefore, mineral interests may be conveyed 
simultaneously. Acceptance of the direct sale offer will qualify the 
purchaser to make application for conveyance of those mineral 
interests.
    The patent, when issued, will contain certain reservations to the 
United States and will be subject to valid existing rights. Detailed 
information concerning these reservations as well as specific 
conditions of the sale are available for review at the Garnet Resource 
Area Office, Bureau of Land Management, 3255 Ft. Missoula Rd., 
Missoula, MT 59801.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Ledger, Realty Specialist, Garnet 
Resource Area, at (406) 329-3914.
    The land described is hereby segregated from appropriation under 
the public land laws, including the mining laws, pending disposition of 
this action or 270 days from the date of publication of this notice, 
whichever occurs first.
    For a period of 45 days from the date of issuance of this notice, 
interested parties may submit comments to the Area Manager, Garnet 
Resource Area, at the above address. In the absence of timely 
objections, this proposal shall become the final determination of the 
Department of the Interior.

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
W. Delon Potter,
Acting Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-16800 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
#### OMEGA OB/GYN ASSOCIATES and Omega OB/GYN Associates of South Arlington, P.A., Relators, v. The FIRST COURT OF APPEALS, and the Honorable Eugene Chambers, Judge of the 215th District Court, Harris County, Respondents.

No. 94-0302.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1994.

Rehearing Overruled Feb. 16, 1995.

Jan Soifer, Margare Uhlig (Pemberton), Austin, Evelyn R. Leopold, Jordan M. Parker, Ken C. Cunningham, Rod Patterson, Fort Worth, for relators.

Michael A. Pullara, Norman Riedmueller, Houston, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

In this original mandamus proceeding relator seeks review of an order protecting mental health records from discovery. Both the trial court and the court of appeals rendered decisions prior to our writing in *R.K v. Ramirez,*887 S.W.2d 836 (Tex.1994). We believe the trial court should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which relator complains in this proceeding in light of *R.K.*Accordingly, without addressing the merits of the petition and without prejudice to either party again requesting relief from the court of appeals and this Court after the trial court has had an opportunity to reconsider its rulings, we conditionally grant the writ and direct the court of appeals to vacate its opinion and order, and the trial court to vacate its order of March 8, 1994. Tex. R.App.P. 122. The writ of mandamus will issue only in the unlikely event they do not do so.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 382-1 Filed 11/15/18 Page 15 of 15
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 115 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide that wages earned, 

and self-employment income derived, by individuals while such individuals 

were not citizens or nationals of the United States and were illegally 

in the United States shall not be credited for coverage under the oldage, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to provide 

that wages earned, and self-employment income derived, 

by individuals while such individuals were not citizens 

or nationals of the United States and were illegally in 

the United States shall not be credited for coverage 

under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 115 IS

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATIONS ON COVERAGE OF INDIVIDUALS 

2 BASED ON EARNINGS PAID OR DERIVED BY 

3 INDIVIDUALS WHILE SUCH INDIVIDUALS 

4 WERE NOT CITIZENS OR NATIONALS OF THE 

5 UNITED STATES AND WERE ILLEGALLY IN 

6 THE UNITED STATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 215(e) of the Social Secu8 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 415(e)) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 

10 subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; 

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(e)’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(2) For purposes of subsections (b) and (d), in com15 puting an individual’s average indexed monthly earnings, 

16 or in the case of an individual whose primary insurance 

17 amount is computed under section 215(a) as in effect 

18 prior to January 1979, average monthly wage, such indi19 vidual shall not be credited with any wages paid to such 

20 individual, or any self-employment income derived by such 

21 individual, while such individual was not a citizen or na22 tional of the United States and was illegally in the United 

23 States.’’. 

24 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

25 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to wages paid, and 

26 self-employment income derived, before, on, or after the 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 115 IS

1 date of the enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding section 

2 215(f)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 415(f)(1)), 

3 as soon as practicable after the date of the enactment of 

4 this Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall recom5 pute all primary insurance amounts to the extent nec6 essary to carry out such amendments. Such amendments 

7 shall affect benefits only for months after the date of the 

8 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 40 Filed 04/10/18 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**(Section 302 ofSarbanes-Oxley)**

 

I, Jeffrey M Watson,President and Chief Executive Officer of Manhattan Bancorp, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Manhattan Bancorp;

 

2.     Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) internal controls over the financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a.     designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others withinthat entity, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b.     evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based upon our evaluation; and

 

c.   disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a.     all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b.     any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|   Date: May 13, 2008 | /s/  Jeffrey M. Watson                 |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                      | Jeffrey M. Watson                      |
|                      | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----