alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 14249), 

kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov

MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805), 

margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov

PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856),

Peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

ANDREW C. STONE (Ariz. Bar No. 026543),

Andrew.stone@usdoj.gov

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

JOHN J. KUCERA (Cal. Bar No. 274184), 

john.kucera@usdoj.gov

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

312 N. Spring Street, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Telephone (213) 894-3391

JOHN P. CRONAN

Acting Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806), 

reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov 

Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

v.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

 Defendants.

No. CR 18-422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

NOTICE OF GOVERNMENT’S FILING 

OF RECORDED LIS PENDENS AS TO 

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN 

COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Plaintiff United States of America gives notice that on May

10, 2018 it recorded the attached Lis Pendens with the Coconino

County Recorder of Deeds under Doc. # 3814854, and sent copies 

of the recorded Lis Pendens to the titled owners and any known 

lienholders. A copy of the Lis Pendens is attached hereto as 

Exhibit “A”.

DATED: July 13, 2018 ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States 

Attorney

District of Arizona

JOHN P. CRONAN

Acting Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department 

of Justice

/s/John J. Kucera

KEVIN RAPP

MARGARET PERLMETER

PETER S. KOZINETS

ANDREW C. STONE

JOHN J. KUCERA

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

REGINALD JONES

Senior Trial Attorney

CERTIFICATION

I certify that on July 13, 2018, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System 

for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the 

following CM/ECF registrants: Anne Chapman, Erin McCampbell, James 

Grant, Lee Stein, Paul Cambria, Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald London, 

Janey Henze Cook, John Littrell, Kenneth Miller, Thomas Bienart, 

Jr., Bruce Feder, Michael Kimerer, Rhonda Neff, KC Maxwell, David 

Wakukawa, Michael Piccarreta, Stephen Weiss.

By: s/Shannen Beckman

U.S. Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217 Filed 07/13/18 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTIONS 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

ThisCertificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of theUnited States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Theundersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofBehringer Harvard Multifamily REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”), each herebycertify as follows:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and allinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated this 13th day of November,2009.

 
|   | /s/ Robert S. Aisner    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Aisner        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Howard S. Garfield  |
|   | Howard S. Garfield      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roger Tex COUNTS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 16349, 16350.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.

Jan. 17, 1990.

Robert Z. Oberzalek, Pros. Atty., Eminence, for plaintiff-respondent.

Frederick W. Martin III, West Plains, for defendant-appellant.

PREWITT, Judge.

Following nonjury trial defendant was convicted of driving while intoxicated, § 577.010, RSMo 1986, and driving while his operator’s license was revoked, § 302.321, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced to one year in the county jail for driving while his operator’s license was revoked and six months in the county jail for driving while intoxicated with the sentences to run consecutively. Defendant appealed both convictions and the appeals were consolidated here.

Defendant does not challenge his conviction of driving while intoxicated. His point on appeal is that the trial court erred in finding him guilty of driving while his operator’s license was revoked “in that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant operated a motor vehicle with knowledge that his driving privileges were revoked.”

In determining sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, this court is obligated to accept as true all direct and circumstantial evidence and all reasonable inferences which are most favorable to the state and disregard the evidence and inferences contrary to a finding of guilt. *State v. Sherrill,*657 S.W.2d 731, 737 (Mo.App. 1983).

Both charges arise out of defendant operating a motor vehicle on October 9, 1988. A copy of defendant’s driving record admitted into evidence shows that his driver’s license has been revoked at least seven times since October 31, 1972, the last time prior to the date of the incidents charged was on January 15, 1987.

The highway patrolman who arrested defendant testified that in a conversation with defendant back on November 9, 1987, defendant said he knew that his driving privilege was revoked. The trooper said that in early October 1988, prior to the arrests which are the subject of this appeal, that defendant again told him he did not have a driver’s license.

In his testimony defendant admitted that he did not have a driver’s license in his possession on October 9, 1988, and that he ran away from the officer as a result. He stated that he had received a letter regarding reinstating his operator’s license and did not believe that his privileges were revoked on that date. Defendant testified that the letter said he had to send $20 to *830receive back his license. According to the copy of his driver’s record he did not have it reinstated.

When defendant was asked if the trooper who arrested him “has anything against you personally?” he replied, “Well, he knows I have no driver license”. Defendant knew that his license had been revoked. He knew he had to take steps to have it reinstated, but did not do so. It is a fair inference from the testimony of the trooper and defendant that defendant knew that his license was revoked on October 9, 1988.

The judgments are affirmed.

CROW, P.J., and GREENE, J., concur.
INDEX OF EXHIBITS

Exhibit Description

A Credit Agreement Dated September 22, 2008 

B AIG September 26, 2008 Form 8-K

C AIG Credit Facility Trust Agreement

D AIG November 10, 2008 Press Release

E AIG November 25, 2008 Form 8-K

F Warrant to Purchase Common Stock

G Securities Purchase Agreement

H AIG Takaful – Frequently Asked Questions

I AIG Takaful – About Us – Mission Statement

J AIG December 1, 2008 Press Release

K Seminar at the U.S. Department of Treasury: Islamic Finance 101

L Henry Builders, Inc. v. United States of America, Case No. 1:09-cv-0288-ENVJMA (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2009) (Decision and order dismissing sua sponte

constitutional challenge to EESA for lack of standing)

M SSFI Program Description 

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM Document 6-2 Filed 02/27/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN ALBERT ,

Plaintiff, Case No. 08-13884

Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor

v. Magistrate Judge Paul Komives

BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES,

et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

(Docket #26)

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul Komives’ Report and

Recommendation of July 21, 2009, granting Defendant Correctional Medical Services’ Motion to

Dismiss (Docket #11) and MDOC Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket #19) and Michigan

Medical Management Affiliates’ Motion for Summary Disposition (Docket #21).

The Court has reviewed the file and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation

No objections have been filed. The Court finds that the law cited by the Magistrate has been

correctly placed and is controlling in this matter. 

Therefore, the Court will accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of July 21,

2009 as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives’s Report and Recommendation

of July 21, 2009 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2009 s/Anna Diggs Taylor

ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to

their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on August 19,

2009.

s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams

Case Manager

2:08-cv-13884-ADT-PJK Doc # 27 Filed 08/19/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 152
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  I, Hank Cohn, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BBN Global Consulting, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: June 11, 2008  /s/ Hank Cohn Hank Cohn Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 1 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 2 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 3 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 4 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 5 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 6 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 7 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 8 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 9 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 10 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 11 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 12 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 13 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 14 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 15 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 16 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 17 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 18 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 19 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 20 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 21 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 22 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 23 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 24 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 25 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 26 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 27 of 28

Case 2:08-cv-15147-LPZ-MKM   Document 8    Filed 03/18/09   Page 28 of 28
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ring Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert “Steve” Owens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the            Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) This Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) I further certify to the best of my knowledge that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ring Energy, Inc.

 

 

| Date: March 30, 2009 | By /s/ Robert “Steve” Owens |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------|

|   | Robert “Steve” Owens, President, |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33534-33535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs


Notice of Intent To Retract 1979 Decision of the Deputy 
Commissioner of Indian Affairs To Deal With the Delaware Tribe of 
Eastern Oklahoma Only for Claims Purposes

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of proposed decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs has determined that 
the position of the Department of the Interior since 1979 with the 
Delaware Tribe of Eastern Oklahoma merits reconsideration. In 1979 the 
Bureau of Indian Affairs through the Acting Deputy Commissioner 
determined, by letter of May 24, 1979, that the Department of the 
Interior would engage in government-to-government relations with the 
Delaware Tribe only through the Cherokee Nation and that the Department 
would deal directly with the Delaware Tribe only for purposes of their 
claims against the United States. The Delaware Tribe of Eastern 
Oklahoma requested that the Assistant Secretary review the 1979 
determination.
    A comprehensive legal review conducted by the Division of Indian 
Affairs, Office of the Solicitor, concludes that the 1979 determination

[[Page 33535]]

did not consider the entire relevant legal record and did not construe 
accurately the provisions of the 1866 Treaty with the Delaware and the 
1867 Agreement between the Delaware and Cherokee. Based on this review, 
the Assistant Secretary has made a preliminary determination that the 
position of the Department stated in the 1979 letter should be 
retracted. Nothing in this preliminary decision should be construed as 
affecting allotments with federally imposed restrictions against 
alienation under the Act of August 4, 1947, 61 Stat. 731.

DATES: The public has until July 29, 1996 to comment on this 
preliminary decision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Maddox, Director, Office of 
Tribal Services, (202) 208-3463.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published in the exercise of 
authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant 
Secretary--Indian Affairs (ASIA) by 209 DM 8. Comments on the 
preliminary decision and/or requests for a copy of the Associate 
Solicitor Memorandum of June 19, 1996, should be addressed to the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Bureau of Indian 
Affairs, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20242, Attention: Office of 
Tribal Services, Mail Stop 4603 MIB. The final decision of the 
Department will follow a review of the public comments.

    Dated: June 21, 1996.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-16380 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Issuance of Permit for Marine Mammals

    On May 15, 1996, a notice was published in the Federal Register, 
Vol. 61, No. 95, Page 24506, that an application had been filed with 
the Fish and Wildlife Service by the Center for Coastal Physical 
Oceanography for a permit (PRT-814695) for the import of tissue samples 
from one walrus (Odobenus rosmarus) and one polar bear (Ursus 
maritimus) in support of research on environmental contamination.
    Notice is hereby given that on June 20, 1996, as authorized by the 
provisions of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) the Fish and Wildlife Service authorized the 
requested permit subject to certain conditions set forth therein.
    Documents and other information submitted for these applications 
are available for review by any party who submits a written request to 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Management Authority, 
4401 North Fairfax Drive, Rm 430, Arlington, Virginia 22203. Phone 
(703) 358-2104 or Fax (703) 358-2281.

    Dated: June 28, 1996.
 Caroline Anderson
 Acting Chief, Branch of Permits Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 96-17018 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16473]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 832]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 21, Charleston, South Carolina, 
Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the South Carolina State Ports 
Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 21, Charleston, South 
Carolina, area, for authority to expand its general-purpose zone to 
include a site in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, was filed by the Board 
on August 15, 1995 (FTZ Docket 44-95, 60 FR 43761, 8/23/95); and,
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 21 is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of June 1996.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16473 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P