alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                       362
<INVENTORY>                                      1,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,720
<PP&E>                                           3,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,974
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            33
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,376
<SALES>                                         17,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,217
<CGS>                                           10,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (46)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (17)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (29)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (29)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

SHELLY ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM,

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 08-14106

Honorable Nancy G. Edmunds

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED ON

FEBRUARY 16, 2010 [30]

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s pro se motion seeking to have the

Court reconsider its February 8, 2010 order granting Defendant’s motion for summary

judgment [28]. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

 Pursuant to Rule 7.1(g)(3) of the Local Rules for the Eastern District of Michigan, the

Court will not grant motions for reconsideration “that merely present the same issues ruled

upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant must not only

demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but

also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.”

Because Plaintiff’s motion fails to satisfy the rule’s requirements, it is DENIED.

“Motions for reconsideration do not allow the losing party to repeat arguments previously

considered and rejected, or to raise new legal theories that should have been raised

earlier.” Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Assoc. v. Arctic Express, Inc., 288 F.

Supp.2d 895, 900 (S.D. Ohio 2003) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
1

This includes Exhibits D-O, CC, PP, VV, YY, and ZZ.

2

Motions for reconsideration likewise do not allow the losing party to attempt to supplement

the record with previously available evidence. See Basinger v. CSX Transp., Inc., No. 94-

3908, 1996 WL 400182, *3 (6th Cir. July 16, 1996) (where the Sixth Circuit held that it was

“not an abuse of discretion for a district court to decline to consider a Rule 59(e) motion in

which the movant attempts to submit evidence that was available at the time the movant

was contesting a summary judgment motion”) (citing Sixth Circuit decisions Emmons v.

McLaughlin, 874 F.2d 351, 358 (6th Cir. 1989); and Huff v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 675 F.2d

119, 122-23 (6th Cir. 1982)). Accordingly, this Court STRIKES the exhibits to Plaintiff’s

motion for reconsideration not previously submitted that address her 2006 EEOC charge1

because, as this Court observed in its February 8, 2010 order, Plaintiff’s counsel stipulated

on the record during Plaintiff’s deposition that the facts surrounding her prior EEOC charge

and subsequent settlement had no bearing on the claims asserted in this lawsuit. (Pl.’s

Dep. at 29, 47, 225.) Therefore, the Clerk of Court is directed to remove the stricken

exhibits from the ECF system 

SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy G. Edmunds 

Nancy G. Edmunds

United States District Judge

Dated: February 18, 2010
3

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or

counsel of record on February 18, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Carol A. Hemeyer 

Case Manager
Exhibit 99.1



     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the filing of the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the Year
Ended  December 31, 2001 (the  "Report") by INSpire  Insurance  Solutions,  Inc.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Registrant.



                                          /s/ Richard Marxen
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Richard Marxen
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

United States of America., 

Plaintiff(s), 

V, 

Michael Locey, el al. 

Defendant (s), 

Disrrict of •. na 

CONSENT ORDER GRANTING 

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 

CAS& NUMBER, 2: I 8-cr-00422-PHX-DJH 

Notice is hereby given th.at, subject to approval by che court, _ _ Jo_h_n _ _B_-;:-nm~•-t :::-::-::-- --- substitutes 

(P~, (II):-•-) 

Gary S. Uncenberg/ Ariel A. Ncurru10 / G0pi K. Pancbapakesao State B""No Ad . .. w - --- --- -:;:--::-;-:;c::-::--:::--- - - - - - • ,u • --ID1Jnd P>wq9£ !.J.M O(:,m,:. of N,:w ,Uwrncy) n.-; counsel of record in 

pla<>e of Oa,y S. Lt»cenberg / Ariel A. Neuman / Gopi K. Paochapalcesan 

(t,.~ or Arlori1(:y ($) Wilhdn"il:16 Ap~n~) 

BIRD, MARELIA\, BOX"ER, WOLPERT, NF.SSIM, DROOl<S, UNCEl<BERC & RHOW, P.C. 

Cotlt.act infonnarion for new counsel is as follows: 

firm Name: 

Address: 

BIRD, MARf.,LI.A, RBOW, LfNCENBRBG, DROQl(S & NF.SSIM, u.p 

IR75 Ccnturv Park l;a~, 2'«1 Aaor. J,.o~ Angele; CA 90062 

Telephone: 

E-MajJ (OptionaJ): gkpwlbirdm1trclla.00;m 

f consent to 1.hc;. above substitution. 

Date: February !).. , 2024 

1 consent to being substituted. 

Date: January 30, 2024 

l consent to tile above substitution. 

Date: January 10 2024 

The substiLUtion of attorney is hereby approved nnd so ORDERED, 

Dace: 

(Sigllllllll\l O{f'-,.y(r.)} 

Garv S. Lincenbc 

Ariel A Neuman 

M11n,,(J f\-.\nN'Af\(lm~•,{11)) 

pi K. l':me.n,ipakcsan 

~ ~ Gaiy S. l.incenberg $ ,;> Ariel A. Neumi\11 

Judge 

!Note: A separa1e consent order of s11bstitutio11 must be filed by each new attorney wishing to enltr an appearance.J 

3911.>342-.I 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2041 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Biotechnologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 8, 2008 (the Report), I, James H. Brennan, Vice President Financial Operations of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |  |                                    
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|April 9, 2008 |  | /s/ James H. Brennan               
|              |  | James H. Brennan                   
|              |  | Vice President Financial Operations
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MOTION TO UNSEAL MAY 3, 2021 PROCEEDING FOR LIMITED PURPOSE 

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. (CA Bar No.135311, admitted pro hac vice)

Whitney Z. Bernstein (CA Bar No. 304917, admitted pro hac vice)

BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL WILLIAMS LLP

903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350

San Clemente, California 92673

Telephone: (949) 369-3700

Facsimile: (949) 369-3701

tbienert@bklwlaw.com

wbernstein@bklwlaw.com

Attorneys for James Larkin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cr-00422-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANT LARKIN’S MOTION TO 

UNSEAL MAY 3, 2021 PROCEEDING 

FOR LIMITED PURPOSE

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1383 Filed 11/08/21 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

MOTION TO UNSEAL MAY 3, 2021 PROCEEDING FOR LIMITED PURPOSE

Defendant James Larkin moves this Court for an order unsealing the transcript of the 

motion hearing held on May 3, 2021, for the limited purpose of allowing the transcript to be 

released to the defendant. Mr. Larkin previously filed a transcript request for the oral argument 

on that date (Doc. 1157). The proceedings were under seal and Mr. Larkin did not move the Court 

to unseal the proceedings at that time. Mr. Larkin now moves this Court to unseal the proceedings 

for the limited purpose of receiving the transcription. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8th day of November 2021,

BIENERT KATZMAN LITTRELL 

WILLIAMS LLP

s/ Whitney Z. Bernstein

Thomas H. Bienert, Jr.

Whitney Z. Bernstein

Attorneys for James Larkin

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1383 Filed 11/08/21 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 8, 2021, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice 

of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance as counsel of 

record. 

/s/ Toni Thomas 

Toni Thomas

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1383 Filed 11/08/21 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the Government’s Motion to Confirm Trial Subpoenas, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Confirm Trial Subpoenas (Doc. 1042).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all trial subpoenas issued for the previous trial 

dates in this case shall remain in effect for the current trial date of January 12, 2021.

Dated this 28th day of July, 2020.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1044 Filed 07/29/20 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q(the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of ManhattanBancorp (the “Company”).

 

I, Jeffrey M Watson, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.             The Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

2.             The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented inthe financial statements included in such reports.

 

 
| Dated:  August 13, 2008 |
|-----------------------------------|
|                              |
|                              |   |
|                              | /s/  Jeffrey M. Watson |
|                              | Jeffrey M. Watson |
|                              | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John W.
Smithson, President and Chief Executive Officer of PMA Capital Corporation, do
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
information contained in the Annual Report of PMA Capital Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of PMA Capital Corporation.

| |  |                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  |                                                      
| |  | /s/ John W. Smithson                                 
| |  | John W. SmithsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                                      
| |  | March 20, 2003                                       

---
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 45 Att. 18

Dockets.Justia.com
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board <SUP>1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\  The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
Stat. 803, which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took effect 
on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
transferred certain functions to the Surface Transportation Board 
(Board). This notice relates to functions that are subject to Board 
jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10903.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[STB Docket No. AB-55 (Sub-No. 530)]


CSX Transportation, Inc.--Abandonment--in Vermilion County, IL

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of findings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has found that the public convenience and necessity 
require or permit the abandonment by CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) of 
its 7.15-mile line of railroad from milepost ZE-113.0 at Henning, to 
milepost ZE-120.15 at Collison, in Vermilion County, IL, subject to a 
public use condition and a labor protective condition. The Board's 
decision will be effective 30 days after publication of this notice 
unless the Board finds that a financially responsible person has 
offered financial assistance (through subsidy or purchase) to enable 
the rail service to continue.

DATES: Any financial assistance offer must be filed with the Board and 
the railroad no later than July 11, 1996. Any offer previously made 
must be remade by the due date.

ADDRESSES: Send offers referring to STB Docket No. AB-55 (Sub-No. 530) 
to: Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control 
Branch, 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20423; and (2) 
CSXT's representative: Charles M. Rosenberger, Senior Counsel, CSX 
Transportation, Inc., 500 Water Street, J150, Jacksonville, FL 32202. 
The following notation must be typed in bold face on the lower left-
hand corner of the envelope containing the offer mailed to the Board: 
``Office of Proceedings, AB-OFA.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
(TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Information and procedures regarding 
financial assistance for continued rail service are contained in 49 
U.S.C. 10904 and 49 CFR 1152.27.

    Decided: June 25, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16712 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Kai
GUI, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated
this 15th day of
June, 2009.





/s/ Kai
GUI


Kai GUI,
Director, Secretary, and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

YOLANDA LEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

/

Case No. 08-14284

District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow

Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [13];

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12];

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [9]

Before the court are plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation.

The court ADOPTS the report and recommendation. Any error by the ALJ in using the

1999 determination as the baseline for comparison with plaintiff’s situation in 2004 was

harmless for the reasons stated by M.J. Scheer. Furthermore, the subsequent award of benefits in

July 2006 is not new evidence that supports a remand. Allen v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec, 561 F.3d

646, 652–53 (6th Cir. 2009). 

Defendant’s motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

 SO ORDERED.

S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

Arthur J. Tarnow

United States District Judge

Dated: July 23, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on July

23, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/THERESA E. TAYLOR 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14284-AJT-DAS Doc # 15 Filed 07/23/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 404
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Anne Chapman (#025969)

anne@mscclaw.com

MITCHELL | STEIN | CAREY | CHAPMAN, PC

One Renaissance Square

2 North Central Avenue, Suite 1450

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Telephone: (602) 388-1232

Attorney for Movants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

NOTICE OF ERRATA

Counsel hereby files this Notice of Errata to advise the Court that footnote 3 of 

movant’s Under Seal Reply in Support of Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees

(Dkt. 379) should be struck. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 16th day of November, 2018.

MITCHELL | STEIN | CAREY | CHAPMAN, PC

By: /s/ Anne M. Chapman

Anne M. Chapman

Attorneys for Movants

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 395 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on November 16th, 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF version 

of this document to the Clerk of Court, using the CM/ECF System, for filing and for 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants:

/s/ Julie Greenwood

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 395 Filed 11/16/18 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 978 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 978

 Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives 
   all documents in the possession of the President relating to the 
 inventory and review of intelligence related to the shooting at Fort 
Hood, Texas, described by the President in a memorandum dated November 
                               10, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

Mr. Hoekstra submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
        the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select)

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives 
   all documents in the possession of the President relating to the 
 inventory and review of intelligence related to the shooting at Fort 
Hood, Texas, described by the President in a memorandum dated November 
                               10, 2009.

    Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit to the House 
of Representatives not later than 14 days after the adoption of this 
resolution all documents (including records, memos, correspondence, or 
other communications) in the possession of the President that refer or 
relate to the inventory and review of intelligence related to the 
shooting on November 5, 2009, at Fort Hood, Texas, described by the 
President in a memorandum dated November 10, 2009.
                                 <all>
```