alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY SHNELL

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, 

Defendant.

/

CIVIL NO. 09-10216

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

A status conference in this matter was scheduled for Tuesday, February 24, 2009

at 2:00 p.m., counsel for the defendant was present and counsel for the plaintiff failed to

appear and did not return a telephone call from the Court. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference in this matter is 

re-scheduled for Tuesday, March 31, 2009 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure of the plaintiff’s counsel to appear in person

will result in dismissal of the case.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 24, 2009 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date,

February 24, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-10216-AC-RSW Doc # 7 Filed 02/24/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 54
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/Alan StockAlan StockChief Executive Officer
  /s/ Carol WaldmanName: Carol WaldmanTitle: Notary Public
 06/07/12
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper
Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010 (the “Form
10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
March 16, 2010





/s/ Andrew BrodkeyAndrew
      BrodkeyChief
      Executive OfficerPacific
      Copper Corp.





Dated:
March 16, 2010





/s/ Rakesh
      MalhotraRakesh
      Malhotra, C.A.,Chief
      Financial OfficerPacific Copper Corp.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 15, 2002 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of HBOA Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December
21, 2000 (Registration No. 333-52424) and the Company's Post-Effective No. 1 to
its Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on December 14, 2000 (Registration
No. 333-50076).

/s/ Sewell & Company, PA
------------------------

Hollywood, Florida
March 31, 2003
Martha s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 15, 2014

No. 04-14-00265-CV

John DONOHUE,

Appellant

v.

Martha DONOHUE,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CI19573

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Temporary Relief and Temporary Injunction is DENIED.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Gary L. Whitlock, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Gary L. Whitlock
-----------------------
Gary L. Whitlock
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 08-20527

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

ARMANDO NINO RAMOS,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

On December 21, 2009, the case was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1(B) and 636(b)(3) for purposes of receiving, on consent of

the parties, Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. The Defendant, along with counsel, appeared

before me on December 21, 2009. In open court I examined the Defendant under oath,

confirmed the Defendant’s consent, and then advised and questioned the Defendant regarding

each of the inquiries prescribed by Rule 11(b) of the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE. Based upon the Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND 1) that

the Defendant is competent to tender a plea, 2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly,

intelligently made, and 3) that the offense(s) to which he pled are supported by an independent

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense(s). Therefore, I have

ordered the preparation of a presentence investigation report.

1:08-cr-20527-TLL-CEB Doc # 18 Filed 12/21/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 52
II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the FEDERAL RULES OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and

Recommendation within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins.

Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984

(6th Cir. 2005). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and

Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security, 474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir.

2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of

any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: December 21, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date,

electronically served on Roy Kranz and Amy Gierhart, and served on District Judge Ludington

in the traditional manner.

Date: December 21, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

1:08-cr-20527-TLL-CEB Doc # 18 Filed 12/21/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 53
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**









In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of WELLENTECH SERVICES,
      INC.
      (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Irwin
      Rapoport, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









/S/  Irwin
      Rapoport


Irwin
      Rapoport


Chief
      Executive
      Officer




November
      14, 2007
2:09-cv-10351-RHC-DAS Doc # 4 Filed 02/03/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 36
2:09-cv-10351-RHC-DAS Doc # 4 Filed 02/03/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 37
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 363 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 363

 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
 wage and to provide for an increase in such wage based on the cost of 
                                living.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Sanders introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
          Committee on Economic and Educational Opportunities

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase the minimum 
 wage and to provide for an increase in such wage based on the cost of 
                                living.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Liveable Wage Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE.

    (a) Rate Increase.--Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act 
of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended by striking out ``and'' after 
``1990,'' and by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``, and 
not less than $5.50 an hour after December 30, 1995''.
    (b) Cost of Living Increase.--Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards 
Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(g) At the beginning of each calendar year after December 30, 
1996, the Secretary shall adjust the rate applicable under subsection 
(a)(1) by the percentage increase which is applicable to the primary 
insurance amount under section 215(i) of the Social Security Act 
effective for benefits payable in January of such calendar year.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STEVE LEVENGOOD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 281 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.4


                      CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE

                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that he is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee for Chase Manhattan RV Owner Trust
1997-A and that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on
behalf of the Issuer in connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the
Issuer and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, NA,
as Indenture Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1997 (the "Indenture"). All
capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the respective
meanings specified in the Indenture and the Agreement.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under his supervision
and, to the best of his knowledge, the Issuer has fulfilled its obligations
under the Indenture for the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 10th
day of February, 2003.

                                  CHASE MANHATTAN RV OWNER TRUST 1997-A
                                  BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Owner Trustee

                                  /s/ Denise M. Geran
                                  ------------------------
                                  Name: Denise M. Geran
                                  Title: Vice President

The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc., as Servicer, hereby requests that
Wilmington Trust Company execute the above Issuer's Certificate and deliver it
to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., as Indenture Trustee.

                                  THE CIT GROUP/SALES
                                  FINANCING, INC., as Servicer

                                  /s/ William L. Schumm
                                  ---------------------
                                  Name: William L. Schumm
                                  Title: Executive Vice President
#### Mary Ann HARTZELL, Respondent, v. Nicholas P. CHIODINI, Appellant.

No. 68991.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Dec. 10, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 30, 1997.

Application to Transfer Denied March 25, 1997.

James F. Koester & Kenneth D. Koester, St. Louis, for Appellant.

Ralph V. Hart, St. Louis, for Respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and HOFF and TURNAGE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Mary Ann Hartzell brought suit against Nicholas P. Chiodini for personal injury resulting from an automobile accident. The court entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Nicholas P. Chiodini.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Order filed, June 02, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00116-CV

____________

OSAMA ABDULLATIF AND ALI MOKARAM, Appellant

V.

ALI CHOUNDHRI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-27197

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 12, 2016. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order My Thuy Cieslar, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Annual Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of EDAP TMS S.A. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company. 

 

 

 

| Dated: March 30, 2007 | /s/ HUGUES DE BANTEL             |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Hugues de Bantel                                                                             |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer                                                                      |

 

 

| Dated: March 30, 2007 | /s/ ERIC SOYER                             |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Eric Soyer                                                                                                                                                                        |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                           |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to EDAP TMS S.A. and will be retained by EDAP TMS S.A. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                            (LETTERHEAD OF KPMG, LLP)


                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Northwest Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
333-41984 (Form S-8), 333-85118 (Form S-8), and 333-46651 (Form S-8) of
Northwest Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated April 8, 2003, relating to the
consolidated statements of financial condition of Northwest Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 2002, which report appears in the June
30, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Northwest Bancorp, Inc.

Our report refers to a change, as of July 1, 2001, in Northwest Bancorp, Inc.'s
method of accounting for goodwill and intangible assets resulting from business
combinations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations, SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, and SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial
Institutions - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB
Interpretation No. 9.




/s/ KPMG, LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
April 11, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 370 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 370

         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Stump introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To repeal the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the National Voter 
Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg et seq.) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE GODINHO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72855 

Agency No. A098-141-535 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 6, 2020**

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

George Godinho, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen 

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 

F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We grant the petition for review and we remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 12 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72855 

In denying Godinho’s motion to reopen as untimely and number barred, the 

BIA found that Godinho failed to show a material change in country conditions in 

India as to his religion claim. In his opening brief, Godinho does not challenge the 

denial of the motion to reopen on this basis. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 

F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in an 

opening brief are waived).

Godinho also sought reopening to apply for asylum, withholding of removal, 

and relief under the Convention Against Torture based on his political opinion. In 

denying the motion to reopen, the BIA abused its discretion by failing to make a 

determination as to Godinho’s political opinion claim and by failing to consider his 

supporting evidence, including the country conditions evidence and Godinho’s two 

declarations. See Sagaydak v. Gonzales, 405 F.3d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir. 2005) (the 

agency is “not free to ignore arguments raised by a petitioner”); see also Salim v. 

Lynch, 831 F.3d 1133, 1137-39 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding the BIA abused its 

discretion by failing to consider evidence of changed country conditions in light of 

the new claim asserted in the motion to reopen); Mejia v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 873, 

879-80 (9th Cir. 2002) (the agency abused its discretion by failing to consider a 

claim asserted in the motion to reopen). Further, the BIA abused its discretion in 

finding that Godinho did not adequately support his claim that a police inspector is 

still looking for him without addressing Godinho’s declarations. See Najmabadi, 
3 14-72855 

597 F.3d at 990 (the BIA “is required to accept as true the facts stated in [an 

applicant’s affidavit accompanying a motion to reopen] unless they are inherently

unbelievable”).

Thus, we grant the petition for review and remand to the BIA for 

proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-

18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.