Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 131 / Monday, July 8, 1996 / Notices 35819

D. Categories of Records and

Individuals Covered by the Match

The SSA records involved in the

match are earnings, self-employment

and other data which constitute tax

return information pursuant to 26 U.S.C.

6103. The Earnings Recording and SelfEmployment Income System (last

published in the FR at 59 FR 62407,

December 5, 1994) maintains records of

individuals’ wages or self-employment

income from employment under Social

Security. The OPM records consists of

annuity data from its system of records

entitled OPM/Central-1—Civil Service

Retirement and Insurance Records (last

published in the FR at 60 FR 63075,

December 8, 1995).

E. Inclusive Date of the Matching

Program

This computer matching program is

subject to review by the Office of

Management and Budget and the

Congress. If no objections are raised by

either, and the mandatory 30-day public

notice period for comment has expired

for this Federal Register notice with no

significant adverse public comments in

receipt resulting in a contrary

determination, then this computer

matching program becomes effective on

the date specified above. By agreement

between OPM and SSA, the matching

program will be in effect and continue

for 18 months with an option to renew

for 12 additional moths under the terms

set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(o)(2)(D).

[FR Doc. 96–17249 Filed 7–5–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325–01–M

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

[Docket No. A96–20; Order No. 1123]

Eagle Harbor, New York 14442 (Jean

Eddy, Petitioner); Notice and Order

Accepting Appeal and Establishing

Procedural Schedule Under 39 U.S.C.

404(b)(5)

(Issued June 26, 1996).

Docket Number: A96–20.

Name of affected post office: Eagle

Harbor, New York 14442.

Name(s) of petitioner(s): Jean Eddy.

Type of determination: Closing.

Date of filing of appeal papers: June

18, 1996.

Categories of issues apparently raised:

1. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C.

404(b)(2)(C)].

2. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C.

404(b)(2)(A)].

After the Postal Service files the

administrative record and the

Commission reviews it, the Commission

may find that there are more legal issues

than those set forth above. Or, the

Commission may find that the Postal

Service’s determination disposes of one

or more of those issues.

The Postal Reorganization Act

requires that the Commission issue its

decision within 120 days from the date

this appeal was filed (39 U.S.C. 404

(b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in

light of the 120-day decision schedule,

the Commission may request the Postal

Service to submit memoranda of law on

any appropriate issue. If requested, such

memoranda will be due 20 days from

the issuance of the request and the

Postal Service shall serve a copy of its

memoranda on the petitioners. The

Postal Service may incorporate by

reference in its briefs or motions, any

arguments presented in memoranda it

previously filed in this docket. If

necessary, the Commission also may ask

petitioners or the Postal Service for

more information.

The Commission orders:

(a) The Postal Service shall file the

record in this appeal by July 3, 1996.

(b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate

Commission shall publish this Notice

and Order and Procedural Schedule in

the Federal Register.

By the Commission.

Cyril J. Pittack,

Acting Secretary.

June 18, 1996 Filing of Appeal letter.

June 26, 1996 Commission Notice and

Order of Filing of Appeal.

July 12, 1996 Last day of filing of petitions to intervene [see 39

C.F.R. 3001.111(b)].

July 23, 1996 Petitioner’s Participant

Statement or Initial Brief

[see 39 C.F.R. 3001.115(a)

and (b)].

August 12,

1996.

Postal Service’s Answering

Brief [see 39 C.F.R.

3001.115(c)].

August 27,

1996.

Petitioner’s Reply Brief

should Petitioner choose

to file one [see 39 C.F.R.

3001.115(d)].

September 3,

1996.

Deadline for motions by any

party requesting oral argument. The Commission

will schedule oral argument only when it is a

necessary addition to the

written filings [see 39

C.F.R. 3001.116].

October 16,

1996.

Expiration of the Commission’s 120-day decisional

schedule [see 39 U.S.C.

404(b)(5)].

[FR Doc. 96–17215 Filed 7–5–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P

West Rushville, Ohio 43163 (Mary R.

Defenbaugh, Petitioner); Notice and

Order Accepting Appeal and

Establishing Procedural Schedule

Under 39 U.S.C. 404(b)(5)

Issued June 26, 1996.

Docket Number: A96–19.

Name of affected post office: West

Rushville, Ohio 43163.

Name(s) of petitioner(s): Mary R.

Defenbaugh.

Type of determination: Consolidation.

Date of filing of appeal papers: June

19, 1996.

Categories of issues apparently raised:

1. Effect on postal services [39 U.S.C.

404(b)(2)(C)].

2. Effect on the community [39 U.S.C.

404(b)(2)(A)].

After the Postal Service files the

administrative record and the

Commission reviews it, the Commission

may find that there are more legal issues

than those set forth above. Or, the

Commission may find that the Postal

Service’s determination disposes of one

or more of those issues.

The Postal Reorganization Act

requires that the Commission issue its

decision within 120 days from the date

this appeal was filed (39 U.S.C. 404

(b)(5)). In the interest of expedition, in

light of the 120-day decision schedule,

the Commission may request the Postal

Service to submit memoranda of law on

any appropriate issue. If requested, such

memoranda will be due 20 days from

the issuance of the request and the

Postal Service shall serve a copy of its

memoranda on the petitioners. The

Postal Service may incorporate by

reference in its briefs or motions, any

arguments presented in memoranda it

previously filed in this docket. If

necessary, the Commission also may ask

petitioners or the Postal Service for

more information.

The Commission Orders

(a) The Postal Service shall file the

record in this appeal by July 5, 1996.

(b) The Secretary of the Postal Rate

Commission shall publish this Notice

and Order and Procedural Schedule in

the Federal Register.

By the Commission.

Cyril J. Pittack,

Acting Secretary.
35820 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 131 / Monday, July 8, 1996 / Notices

June 19, 1996 .............. Filing of Appeal letter.

June 26, 1996 .............. Commission Notice and Order of Filing of Appeal.

July 15, 1996 ............... Last day of filing of petitions to intervene [see 39 CFR 3001.111(b)].

July 24, 1996 ............... Petitioner’s Participant Statement or Initial Brief [see 39 CFR 3001.115(a) and (b)].

August 13, 1996 .......... Postal Service’s Answering Brief [see 39 CFR 3001.115(c)].

August 28, 1996 .......... Petitioner’s Reply Brief should Petitioner choose to file one [see 39 CFR 3001.115(d)].

September 4, 1996 ...... Deadline for motions by any party requesting oral argument. The Commission will schedule oral argument only

when it is a necessary addition to the written filings [see 39 CFR 3001.116].

October 17, 1996 ........ Expiration of the Commission’s 120-day decisional schedule [see 39 U.S.C. 404(b)(5)].

[FR Doc. 96–17214 Filed 7–5–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB

Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad

Retirement Board has submitted the

following proposal(s) for the collection

of information to the Office of

Management and Budget for review and

approval.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL(S):

(1) Collection title: Request for Review

of Part B Medicare Claim.

(2) Form(s) submitted: G–790, G–791.

(3) OMB Number: 3220–0100.

(4) Expiration date of current OMB

clearance: July 31, 1996.

(5) Type of request: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

(6) Respondents: Individuals or

households.

(7) Estimated annual number of

respondents: 4,000.

(8) Total annual responses: 4,100.

(9) Total annual reporting hours:

1,025.

(10) Collection description: The

Railroad Retirement Board administers

the Medicare program for persons

covered by the railroad retirement

system. The request provides the means

for obtaining reviews by the

MetraHealth Insurance Company on

claims for Part B Medicare benefits.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS:

Copies of the form and supporting

documents can be obtained from Chuck

Mierzwa, the agency clearance officer

(312–751–3363). Comments regarding

the information collection should be

addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad

Retirement Board, 844 North Rush

Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611–2092 and

the OMB reviewer, Laura Oliven (202–

395–7316), Office of Management and

Budget, Room 10230, New Executive

Office Building, Washington, D.C.

20503.

Chuck Mierzwa,

Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–17253 Filed 7–5–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7905–01–M

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No.

22049; 811–5966]

Oppenheimer Global Environment

Fund; Notice of Application

July 1, 1996.

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange

Commission (‘‘SEC’’).

ACTION: Notice of Application for

Deregistration under the Investment

Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’).

APPLICANT: Oppenheimer Global

Environment Fund.

RELEVANT ACT SECTION: Section 8(f).

SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicant

requests an order declaring that it has

ceased to be an investment company.

FILING DATES: The application was filed

on February 12, 1996, and amended on

June 24, 1996.

HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An

order granting the application will be

issued unless the SEC orders a hearing.

Interested persons may request a

hearing by writing to the SEC’s

Secretary and serving applicant with a

copy of the request, personally or by

mail. Hearing requests should be

received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on July

26, 1996 and should be accompanied by

proof of service on the applicant, in the

form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a

certificate of service. Hearing requests

should state the nature of the writer’s

interest, the reason for the request, and

the issues contested. Persons may

request notification of a hearing by

writing to the SEC’s Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 5th

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.

Applicant, Two World Trade Center,

New York, New York 10048–0203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sarah A. Buescher, Staff Attorney, at

(202) 942–0573, or Robert A. Robertson,

Branch Chief, at (202) 942–0564

(Division of Investment Management,

Office of Investment Company

Regulation).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

following is a summary of the

application. The complete application

may be obtained for a fee from the SEC’s

Public Reference Branch.

Applicant’s Representations

1. Applicant is an open-end

management investment company

organized as a Massachusetts business

trust. On November 22, 1989, applicant

filed a registration statement on Form

N–1A pursuant to section 8(b) of the Act

and under the Securities Act of 1933 to

register its shares. The registration

statement became effective on March 1,

1990, and the initial public offering

commenced on or about the same date.

2. On June 16, 1994, applicant’s board

of trustees adopted an Agreement and

Plan of Reorganization (the

‘‘Reorganization Plan’’) whereby

applicant would exchange its net assets

for shares of Oppenheimer Global

Emerging Growth Fund (‘‘OGEGF’’), a

registered, open-end management

investment company, and the OGEGF

shares would be distributed pro rata to

applicant’s shareholders.

3. On August 16, 1994, applicant filed

a proxy statement with the SEC that was

declared effective on September 19,

1994. Applicant’s shareholders

approved the Reorganization Plan on

November 11, 1994.

4. At the close of business on

November 17, 1994, immediately

preceding effectiveness of the

Reorganization Plan, applicant had

2,815,907.520 shares outstanding. As of

that date, applicant’s aggregate net

assets were $27,636,863.83, and the net

asset value per share was $9.81. In

exchange for 1,540,515.42 shares of

OGEGF, applicant transferred to OGEGF

its assets less liabilities with respect to:

(a) amounts payable for portfolio

securities purchased but not yet settled;

(b) a cash reserve retained for the

payment of the expenses of applicant’s

dissolution and its liabilities; (c)

deferred trustee amounts; and (d) capital

stock. Pursuant to the Reorganization

Plan, applicant received that number of

OGEGF shares having an aggregate net

asset value equal to the value of

applicant’s net assets.

5. On November 18, 1994, the

reorganization was consummated.

Applicant was subsequently liquidated

and applicant’s shareholders received

pro rata the OGEGF shares received by

applicant pursuant to the

reorganization.