alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exh-cicsched.htm


    SCHEDULE
TO FORM OF AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO

    WITH
CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     

     

    The
Company has entered into Agreements ("Change in Control Agreements") with the
following executive officers1:

     

    
      
        
          
            	
                    Executive Officer

                  	
                    Date Agreement Executed

                  
	
                    James
      S. Andrasick

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    Christopher
      J. Benjamin

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    Norbert
      M. Buelsing

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    Meredith
      J. Ching

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    Nelson
      N. S. Chun

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    Matthew
      J. Cox

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    W.
      Allen Doane

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    G.
      Stephen Holaday

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  
	
                    Stanley
      M. Kuriyama

                  	
                    December
      11, 2008

                  


          

        

      

    

     

    _________________________

    1 This
is a listing of those executive officers with Change in Control Agreements; it
is not a complete list of the executive officers of Alexander &
Baldwin, Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0147 IN THE MATTER OF: R.S., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 7, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2022

08/31/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0147
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

feder law office, p.a.

2930 e. camelback road, suite 160

phoenix, arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135

bf@federlawpa.com

fl@federlawpa.com

Bruce Feder - State Bar No. 004832

Attorney for Defendant, Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

Scott Spear. )

)

Defendant. )

)

)

)

NO. CR18-00422 PHX SPL

DEFENDANT SCOTT SPEAR’S

JOINDER IN DEFENDANTS LACEY’S

AND LARKIN’S OPPOSITION TO

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR

ACCESS TO THE JOINT

REPRESENTATION AND JOINT

DEFENSE AGREEMENTS

The Defendant, Scott Spear, by and through his attorney, Bruce Feder/Feder Law Office.,

P.A., hereby joins in Defendants Lacey’s and Larkin’s Opposition to Government’s Motion for

Access to the Joint Representation and Joint Defense Agreements [408] in all respects as said

Opposition applies to him.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 11th day of December, 2018.

FEDER LAW OFFICE, P.A.

/s/ Bruce Feder

Attorney for Defendant, Scott Spear

. . .

. . .

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 413 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 11th day of December, 2018, I electronically transmitted the

foregoing to the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice

of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Kevin Rapp: Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov

John Kucera: John.Kucera@usdoj.gov

Reginald Jones: Reginald.Jones@usdoj.gov

Peter S. Kozinets: Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States

Paul Cambria: pcambira@lglaw.com

James Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

Erin McCampbell: emccampbell@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Rever: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Ronald London: ronnielondon@dwt.com

Janey Henze Cook: janey@henzecookemurphy.com

John Littrell: jlittrell@bmkattorneys.com

Kenneth Miller: kmiller@bmkattorneys.com

Michael Piccarreta: mlp@pd-law.com

Stephen M. Weiss: sweiss@karpweiss.com

Michael Kimerer: mdk@kimerer.com

Tom Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Gary Lincenberg: gsl@birdmarella.com

Ariel Neuman: aneuman@birdmarella.com

KC Maxwell: kcm@kcmaxlaw.com

David Wakukawa: dsw@kcmaxlaw.com

Attorneys for the Defense

By: /s/ A. Jones

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 413 Filed 12/11/18 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 2 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 3 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 4 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 5 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 6 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 7 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 8 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 9 of 10
Case 4:18-cv-00053-FRZ-PSOT Document 10 Filed 06/13/18 Page 10 of 10
EXHIBIT A

Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 1 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 2 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 3 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 4 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 5 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 6 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 7 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 8 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 9 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 10 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 11 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 12 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 13 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 14 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 15 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 16 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 17 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 18 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 19 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 20 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 21 of 22
Case 4:18-cr-00353-RCC-BGM Document 45-2 Filed 03/21/19 Page 22 of 22
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32463-32464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15949]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 32464]]


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--U.S. Department of Commerce Advanced Technology 
Program (ATP)/National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 
Project No. 94-02-0048 ``Manufacturing Composite Structures for the 
Offshore Oil Industry''

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 28, 1996, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), the participants in the ATP/NIST 
Project No. 94-02-0048 have filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and with the Federal Trade Commission 
disclosing a change in project membership. The notifications were filed 
for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery 
of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Northrup Grumman Corporation, Sunnyvale, 
CA, has become a participant in the Project; and Westinghouse Electric 
Corporation has terminated its membership.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or the 
planned activities of the Project.
    On March 17, 1995, ATP/NIST Project No. 94-02-0048 filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 27, 1995 (60 FR 20750).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 96-15949 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16748]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 53-96]


Foreign-Trade Subzone 183A--Dell Computer Corporation Application 
for Expansion

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) by the Foreign Trade Zone of Central Texas, Inc., grantee 
of FTZ 183, requesting authority to expand Subzone 183A at the computer 
manufacturing facilities of Dell Computer Corporation (Dell) located in 
Austin, Texas. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions 
of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the 
regulations of the Board (15 CFR Part 400). It was formally filed on 
June 19, 1996.
    Subzone 183A was approved on November 16, 1992 (Board Order 607, 57 
FR 56902; 12/1/92). The subzone currently consists of the following 
three sites: Site 1: (32 acres) located in the Braker Center Industrial 
Park, at the intersection of Braker Lane and Metric Boulevard; Site 2: 
McKalla 2 (124,000 sq. ft.) located at 2500 McHale Court within the 
Rutland Center Industrial Park; and, Site 3: Research 1 (100,685 sq. 
ft.) located at 8701 Research Boulevard, Austin, Texas. Sites 2 and 3 
are temporary sites, which expire on December 31, 1996.
    The applicant is now requesting authority to expand the subzone as 
follows:

--Expand Site 1 to include three buildings (Braker C, D & F, 9 acres, 
143,280 sq. ft.)
--Add Site 2 to the subzone plan on a permanent basis
--Expand Site 2 by adding a building (McKalla I, 135,000 sq. ft.) 
located at 10220 McKalla Drive; and,
--Add Site 3 to the subzone plan on a permanent basis.

    Dell is authorized to manufacture computers and related products 
under zone procedures within Subzone 183A. This proposal does not 
involve any new manufacturing authority under zone procedures.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations (as revised, 56 FR 
50790-50808, 10-8-91), a member of the FTZ Staff has been designated 
examiner to investigate the application and report to the Board.
    Public comment (original and 3 copies) is invited from interested 
parties (see FTZ Board address below). The closing date for their 
receipt is August 30, 1996. Rebuttal comments in response to material 
submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the 
subsequent 15-day period (to September 16, 1996).
    A copy of the application and accompanying exhibits will be 
available for public inspection at each of the following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce, District Office, 410 E. 5th Street, Suite 
414-A, Austin, TX 78711
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, Room 3716, 14th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230

    Dated: June 24, 1996.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16748 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIKAH FIALKA-FELDMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-14922

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD

OF TRUSTEES, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against Defendants seeking housing in one of Oakland

University’s on-campus dormitory living spaces. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants’ denial

of his request for housing violates the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(3)(B), § 504

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a), and the Americans with

Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. In an Opinion and Order issued on

December 23, 2009, the Court held that Defendants violated § 504 of the Rehabilitation

Act by failing to provide Plaintiff with a reasonable accommodation that will enable him

to live on-campus.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that Judgment is entered in

favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants.

DATE: January 7, 2010 S/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

Counsel of Record
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THOMAS BRENNAN,

Petitioner,

v.

CARMEN D. PALMER,

Respondent. 

/

Case Number: 09-CV-10094

Honorable Paul D. Borman

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 

Before the Court is Petitioner Thomas Brennan’s “Motion for Appointment of

Counsel.” (Dkt. # 2.) On January 9, 2009, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he is incarcerated in violation of

his constitutional rights. He was convicted by a St. Clair County, Michigan, Circuit Court

jury of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, in violation of MICH. COMP. LAWS

§750.520(b)(1)(a), and was sentenced to eleven-years-three-months- to thirty-years

imprisonment. In his habeas pleadings, Petitioner alleges insufficient evidence, prosecutorial

misconduct, incorrectly scored sentencing guidelines, violations of his right to confrontation,

cumulative errors, and ineffective assistance of counsel. In the present motion, Petitioner

is requesting that the Court appoint him an attorney because the issues in his case are

complex and substantial. For the reasons stated, the Court denies Petitioner’s motion.

2:09-cv-10094-PDB-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/30/09 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 364
2

There exists no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in civil cases, and

the Court has broad discretion in determining whether counsel should be appointed. Childs

v. Pellegrin, 822 F.2d 1382, 1384 (6th Cir. 1987) (“[A]ppointment of counsel in a civil case

is . . . a matter within the discretion of the court. It is a privilege and not a right.”) (internal

quotation omitted). A habeas petitioner may obtain representation at any stage of the case

“[w]henever the United States magistrate or the court determines that the interests of justice

so require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). 

The Court determines that the interests of justice do not require appointment of

counsel at this time. The Court will reconsider Petitioner’s request if, following a review of

the pleadings and the necessary Rule 5 materials, the Court determines that appointment of

counsel is necessary. Petitioner need not file additional motions on this issue.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Motion for Appointment of

Counsel” [Dkt. # 2] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

S/Paul D. Borman 

PAUL D. BORMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: March 30, 2009

2:09-cv-10094-PDB-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/30/09 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 365
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail

on March 30, 2009.

S/Denise Goodine 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10094-PDB-MJH Doc # 6 Filed 03/30/09 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 366
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper
      Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2008(the
“Form
      10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      March 13, 2008







/s/
                Andrew A. BrodkeyAndrew
                A. Brodkey, CEO and President(Chief
                Executive Officer and President of Pacific Copper Corp.)





Dated:
      March 13, 2008







/s/
                Rakesh MalhotraRakesh
                Malhotra, C.A., Chief Financial Officer(Chief
                Financial Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
2/27/2018 www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civi1_js44.pl 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Civil Cover Sheet 

This automated JS-44 conforms generally to the manual JS-44 approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 

1974. The data is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. The information contained 

herein neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This form is authorized for 

use only,: in the District of Arizona. 

The completed cover sheet must be printed directly to PDF and filed as an attachment to the 

Complaint or Notice of Removal. 

Plaintiff(s): American �uslims for Palestine; Dr.

Hatem Baz1an 

County of Residence: Outside the State of Arizona 

County Where Claim For Relief Arose: Maricopa 

Plaintiffs Atty(s): 

Raeesabbas Mohamed 

KELLY/WARNER LAWPLLC 

8283 N. Hayden Rd. Ste. 229 

Scottsdale, Arizona 85258 

408-331-9397

Arizona State University; Arizona 

Defendant(s): Board of Regents; Mark Brnovich , 

Attorney General of Arizona 

County of Residence: Maricopa 

Defendant's Atty(s): 

II. Basis of Jurisdiction: 3. Federal Question (U.S. not a party)

III. CitizenshiP- of Princi12al

Parties (Diversity Cases Only) 

Plaintiff:- N/ A 

Defendant:- N/ A 

IV. Origin : 1. Original Proceeding

V. Nature of Suit: 950 Constitutionality of State Statute 

VI.Cause of Action: Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 35-393 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments 

to the U.S. Constitution. 

VII. Reguested in Com12laint

Class Action: No 

Dollar Demand: permanent injunction 

Jury Demand: Yes 

VIII. This case IS RELATED to Case Number 3:17-cv-08263 assigned to Judge Diane J Humetewa.

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civi1_js44.pl 1/2 

Case 2:18-cv-00670-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 03/01/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cv-00670-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 03/01/18 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T CHARLE S G. RE EC E, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. D . K . SI STO , W ar d e n ; D O N M I M I S, P l antO pe r a t i on, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 16070 D . C . N o . 2 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 2 0 3 - J A MEFB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . M e nde z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner C harl es G . R ee ce appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct co u rt ’ s j u d g m en td i sm i ssi n g h i s 4 2 U . S . C . § 1 9 8 3 act i o n fo r fai l u re t o ex h au st a d mi n i s tr a t i v e r e me d i e s a s r e q u i r e db yth e Pr i s o n Li t i g a t i o n Re f o rm A c t , 4 2 U . S. C. 

# FI LED AU G 02 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 16070 2 § 1 9 9 7 e ( a ) . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , Sa p p v . Kim b r e ll , 623 F . 3d 813, 821 ( 9th C i r . 2010) , and w e r e ve r s e and r e m and. T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i sm i ssedR eece’s act i o n b ecau se R eece d i dn o tex h au st adm i ni strat i ve re m edi es atthe se cond and fi nal l evel s of r evi ew . H ow ever , because R ee ce ’ s gri evance w as ful l y grant ed atthe fi rs tl evelof re vi ew , R ee ce “h a [ d ] n o o b lig a tio n to ap p e a l f r o m ag r an t o f

r e lie f . . . in o r d e rto e x h au s t h is adm i ni strat i ve re m edi es . ” H arv e yv . J ordan , 6 0 5 F .3 d6 8 1 , 6 8 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . A cco rd i n g l y, w e rev erse an drem an dfo r fu rth er p ro ceed i n g s. RE V E RS E D a n d RE MAND E D.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and
 2.
    
    that as of the date of this statement, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
 September
13, 2005
    

/s/
William J. WagnerDate
    
    William J. WagnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 September
13, 2005
    
    /s/ William W. Harvey, Jr.Date
    
    William W. Harvey, Jr.Senior Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of POWRtec International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Grant Jasmin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Grant Jasmin By: Grant Jasmin Chief Executive Officer  Dated: August 16, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.