alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Mintak, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Dussault Apparel
      Inc. for the period ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Dussault Apparel Inc.                                                                 

Dated: June 21, 2010



| | /s/
      Robert Mintak                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Robert Mintak                                                       
| | Chief Financial Officer                                             
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Dussault Apparel Inc.                                               



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Dussault Apparel
Inc. and will be retained by Dussault Apparel Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RASHEEN GRAYSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 540 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 130 (Friday, July 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35201-35202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17083]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP96-585-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application

June 28, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 20, 1996, Southern Natural Gas Company, 
P.O. Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, filed in Docket No. 
CP96-585-000 an application pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas 
Act for authorization to abandon certain pipeline and appurtenant 
facilities in LaFourche, Jefferson, Plaquenmines, Terrebonne, St. 
Bernard and St. Charles Parishes, Louisiana, approximately 45 miles of 
jointly-owned pipeline located offshore Louisiana, as well as any 
interest in measurement and appurtenant facilities located thereon, and 
its Rate Schedule X-36 exchange service with Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company, all as more fully set forth in the application on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before July 19, 1996, file 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, 
a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in

[[Page 35202]]

determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules and Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that a grant of the certificate is required by the public 
convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave to intervene is timely 
filed, or if the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal 
hearing is required, further notice of such hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
it will be unnecessary for Southern to appear or be represented at the 
hearing.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96-17083 Filed 7-3-96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
{00005601;v1 }

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

BRAINTECH, INC., a Nevada corporation,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

v.

ADIL SHAFI, an individual,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

FREDERICK WEIDINGER, an individual,

Third-Party Defendant.

_____________________________________/

Case No. 09-10454

Hon. Victoria A. Roberts

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ADIL SHAFI’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO FILE BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN 

EXCESS OF TWENTY PAGES 

The Court reviewed Defendant Adil Shafi’s Ex Parte Motion For Leave To File 

Brief In Response To Joint Motion For Summary Judgment In Excess of Twenty Pages.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Adil Shafi’s Ex Parte Motion For Leave To File 

Brief In Response To Joint Motion For Summary Judgment In Excess of Twenty Pages

is GRANTED and that he may file a Response that exceeds twenty pages.

/s/Victoria A. Roberts_________

United States District Judge

Dated: 12/22/10

Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 73 Filed 12/22/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Bioheart, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officers knowledge that:


|(i) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Companys position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved
SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report); and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


|November 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/
Mark Borman Name: Mark Borman Title: Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 3 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 4 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 5 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 6 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 7 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 8 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 9 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 10 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 11 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 12 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 13 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 462-1 Filed 02/19/19 Page 14 of 14 Case 2:16-mb-00305-MHB Document 6 Filed 11/01/16 Page 13 of 13
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-21266 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR MEJIA-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-514-ALL

-------------------- October 29, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Oscar Mejia-Diaz (Mejia) argues that the district court plainly erred in failing to verify that he had read and discussed the presentence report (PSR) with his counsel as required by F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32(c)(3)(A). A review of the sentencing hearing transcript reflects that the district court did not ascertain whether Mejia had read and reviewed the PSR with counsel. Because Mejia did not object to the omission in the district court, this court could “correct the error only if the error wasNo. 01-21266 -2- plain and affected [Mejia’s] substantial rights.” United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez , 268 F.3d 272, 274 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 122 S. Ct. 1547 (2002). Although F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32 has not been interpreted as creating an absolute requirement that the district court specifically ask a defendant whether he has read the PSR, see id. , the record does not raise a reasonable inference that Mejia personally reviewed the report and discussed it with counsel. However, Mejia has not shown that the error affected his substantial rights. Mejia has not argued that he did not read and review the PSR. Nor has he demonstrated the existence of factual inaccuracies in the PSR that, if successfully challenged, would have resulted in his receiving a lesser sentence. Because Mejia has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the district court’s failure to strictly comply with F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32, he has failed to demonstrate plain error. See id. The sentence imposed is AFFIRMED.
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 43 Att. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 3097
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 3098
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 3099
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 3100
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 3101
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 3102
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 124-1 Filed 11/14/11 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 3103
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1202 

To provide for the apportionment of funds to airports for fiscal years 2011 

and 2012 based on passenger boardings during calendar year 2008 

to prevent additional harm to airports already harmed by the financial 

crisis, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide for the apportionment of funds to airports for 

fiscal years 2011 and 2012 based on passenger boardings 

during calendar year 2008 to prevent additional harm 

to airports already harmed by the financial crisis, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Airport Relief 

5 Act of 2009’’. 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•S 1202 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPORTIONMENT OF FUNDS FOR CERTAIN AIR2 PORT PROJECTS. 

3 Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(H) SPECIAL RULE FOR FISCAL YEARS

6 2011 AND 2012.—Notwithstanding subparagraph 

7 (A), the Secretary shall apportion to the spon8 sor of an airport for fiscal year 2011 or fiscal 

9 year 2012 an amount based on the number of 

10 passenger boardings at the airport in calendar 

11 year 2008 if the airport had— 

12 ‘‘(i) fewer than 10,000 passenger 

13 boardings in the calendar year used to cal14 culate the apportionment for that fiscal 

15 year under subparagraph (A); and 

16 ‘‘(ii) 10,000 or more passenger 

17 boardings in calendar year 2008.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on PRODPC75 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34744-34745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-30; RM-8762]


Television Broadcasting Services; Antigo, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.


[[Page 34745]]


ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Action in this proceeding allots UHF Television Channel 46 to 
Antigo, Wisconsin, in response to a petition filed by Robert J. Cox d/
b/a Native American Television. The coordinates for Channel 46 at 
Antigo are 45-08-54 and 89-09-00. Canadian concurrence has been 
obtained for this allotment.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 12, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 96-30, adopted June 21, 1996, and released 
June 28, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.606  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.606(b), the Table of TV Allotments under Wisconsin, 
is amended by adding Antigo, Channel 46.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-16953 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Case 2:08-cr-20520-DML-MKM ECF No. 567-1, PageID.2018 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Ispat International N.V.
(the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Mr Bhikam C. Agarwal, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/      Lakshmi N. Mittal
------------------------------------
Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal
Chairman of Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Ispat
International N.V.
March 9, 2004





/s/      Bhikam C. Agarwal
-----------------------------------
Mr. Bhikam C. Agarwal
Chief Financial Officer of Ispat International N.V.
March 9, 2004





     This certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and accompanies
the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ispat International N.V.
and will be retained by Ispat International N.V. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16446]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES


Cooperative Agreement for a Publication on Arts and Substance 
Abuse Prevention

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts.

ACTION: Notification of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts requests proposals leading 
to the award of a Cooperative Agreement for the development, 
production, and printing of a publication that will highlight exemplary 
projects involving artists and arts organizations in substance abuse 
prevention programs. The publication is anticipated to be approximately 
100 pages. a printing of $100,000 copies is desired. Those interested 
in receiving the Solicitation should reference Program Solicitation PS 
96-08 in their written request and include two (2) self-addressed 
labels. Verbal requests for the Solicitation will not be honored.

DATES: Program Solicitation PS 96-08 is scheduled for release 
approximately July 16, 1996 with proposals due on August 19, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Requests for the Solicitation should be addressed to 
National Endowment for the Arts, Grants & Contracts Office, Room 618, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William I. Hummel, Grants and Contracts Office, National Endowment for 
the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506 (202/
682-5482).

William I. Hummel,
Coordinator, Cooperative Agreements and Contracts.
[FR Doc. 96-16446 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
# J\ COURTOFAPP^LS^^T£J$pCT ^"i301 Fannin Street Houston, Texas 77002^2066 

### RE: Case No.'*401¥i-i%f0 0894-CR 

## V.'$a¥^ USPOSTAGE»RTNEYBOWES
Style: Juan Cerda Alvarado v. The State of Texas



### On January 26, 2015, the Court today G: 

### for extension of time to file the reporter to and including February 23, 2015.
C. Case # ll-DCR-058831 Juan Cer #001701 1410 W, Richmi NIXIE

BC: 

### RETURN TO SENDER UNCLAIMED 

### UNABLE TO FORWARD 7 7 80? 7 afifiaa ZIP 77002 02 1W 1372104 JAN 26 2015 ) request cause
NO. 07-12-00512-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

DECEMBER 7, 2012

CECIL MCDONALD, A/K/A CECIL TRIMBLE, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2000-434,614; HONORABLE BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

	Appellant, Cecil McDonald, filed an “Application for a Certificate of Appealability” with the trial court on November 26, 2012.  In this application, appellant seeks to appeal his 2001 conviction for murder on the basis that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.[footnoteRef:1]  The direct appeal of the trial court’s 2001 judgment was resolved by this Court’s opinion and judgment of August 29, 2007.  SeeMcDonald v. State, No. 07-06-0276-CR, 2007 Tex.App. LEXIS 7139 (Tex.App.—Amarillo Aug. 29, 2007, pet. ref’d).  Following denial of appellant’s petition for discretionary review by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, seeIn re Trimble, No. PD-1435-07, 2008 Tex.Crim.App. 45 (Tex.Crim.App. Jan. 16, 2008) (decision without published opinion), mandate was issued on May 15, 2008.  This Court’s plenary power expired 60 days after judgment.  TEX. R. APP. P. 19.1(a).   [1:  Because appellant’s application expresses his desire to appeal this 2001 judgment, we have construed the application to be a notice of appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(2).] 

As a result, this Court does not have jurisdiction over appellant’s attempted appeal.  Because this Court is without plenary power over this appeal, no further action may be taken by this Court in this proceeding and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

2

							Mackey K. Hancock

							          Justice

Do not publish.  

2