alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 92 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 92

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 28, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 1) making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and 
creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance 
to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. Further general debate shall 
be confined to the bill and amendments specified in this resolution and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The amendment printed in 
part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. 
The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose 
of further amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. 
All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. 
Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further amendment to the bill, as 
amended, shall be in order except those printed in part B of the report of the 
Committee on Rules. Each such further amendment may be offered only in the order 
printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 
shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 
report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall 
not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 
of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of 
order against such further amendments are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House 
with such further amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  The chair of the Committee on Appropriations shall insert in the 
Congressional Record not later than February 4, 2009, such material as he may 
deem explanatory of appropriations measures for the fiscal year 2009.
    Sec. 3.  The chair of the Committee on Ways and Means may file, on behalf of 
the Committee, a supplemental report to accompany H.R. 598.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Vanguard Natural Resources,
LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Richard A. Robert, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company





/s/ Richard A.
      RobertRichard
      A. RobertExecutive
      Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)December 19,
2008
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50221 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. DAVID DURAN

- ARIAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:14

- CR

- 2045

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Duran

- Arias pleaded guilty to one count of being found in the United States following deportation. The district court denied Duran

- Arias’s request for a downward departure or variance and sentenced him within the advisory guidelines range to 24 months in prison, to be followed by a three

year term of nonreporting supervised release. Duran

- Arias argues on appeal that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to argue at

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 13, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50221 Document: 00513270249 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/13/2015No. 15

- 50221

2 se ntencing the points that were raised in the defense sentencing

mem orandum, failing to request specific relief , and failing to object on the record at sentencing to preserve Duran

- Arias’s appellate arguments. In addition, Duran

- Arias complains that his tri al counsel’s reference to his client’s alcohol addiction in the request for a below

- guidelines sentence constituted ineffective assistance because it was an improper basis for a downward departure under the Sentencing Guidelines. This court generally does not review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014). We have “undertaken to resolve claims of inadequate representati on on direct appeal only in rare cases where the record allowed us to evaluate fairly the merits of the claim.” United States v. Higdon , 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1987). In most instances, we qualify a claim as a “rare case” warranting review only when it was raised and developed in a post

trial motion to the district court. United States v. Stevens , 487 F.3d 232, 245 (5th Cir. 2007). Duran

- Arias did not raise these ineffective assistance claims in the district court at any time. Because the record i s not sufficiently developed to allow for a fair consideration of these claims, we decline to consider them on direct appeal without prejudice to Duran

- Arias’s right to raise them on collateral review. See Isgar , 739 F.3d at 841. Accordingly, the judgmen t of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 15-50221 Document: 00513270249 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/13/2015
Modification to Terms of Employment for John T. Wilson



 Exhibit 10.4 

Modification to Terms of Employment for John T. Wilson 

March 27, 2014 
 Dear John: 

The following will modify your Employment Agreement dated June 25, 2012, as amended pursuant to a letter agreement dated
December 30, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”) with Quality Distribution, Inc. (the “Company) effective as of March 3, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). 

 

	 	1.	Section 3.1 is amended by substituting the following for the first sentence thereof: 

 As
compensation for all services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, the Company agrees to pay to the Executive during the Term a base salary, payable bi-weekly, at the annual rate of $275,000 (the “Base Salary”). 

 

	 	2.	Section 3.5 is amended by substituting the following for the first sentence thereof: 

 The
Executive shall be eligible at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, to receive an annual equity award, at target, equal to 75% of Executive’s base salary compensation. 

The Company requests your signature and your subsequent delivery of this letter agreement to the Company to evidence confirmation of your
understanding of, and agreement to, the above-described changes to the terms of your employment as of the Effective Date. Except as set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and
effect. 
  

			
	QUALITY DISTRIBUTION, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Gary R. Enzor

		 	Gary R. Enzor
		 	Chief Executive Officer
	
	Agreed to and accepted as of the date first written above.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John T. Wilson

		 	John T. Wilson
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yang Zhao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ YANG ZHAO          
|Yang Zhao              
|Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2008

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such
filings to the Report.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 979 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 979

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of the 
                Common Core State Standards Initiative.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

 Mr. Fattah submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of the 
                Common Core State Standards Initiative.

Whereas the Common Core State Standards Initiative is a joint effort by the 
        National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council 
        of Chief State School Officers in partnership with Achieve, ACT, and the 
        College Board;
Whereas governors and State commissioners of education from across the country 
        committed to joining a State-led process to develop a common core of 
        State standards in English-language arts and mathematics for grades K-
        12;
Whereas these standards will be research and evidence-based, internationally 
        benchmarked, aligned with college and work expectations, and include 
        rigorous content and skills;
Whereas the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the 
        Council of Chief State School Officers are coordinating the process to 
        develop these standards and have created an expert validation committee 
        to provide an independent review of the common core State standards, as 
        well as the grade-by-grade standards;
Whereas students in the United States compete with peers across the country and 
        around the world; and
Whereas the future economic, diplomatic, and military strength of the United 
        States will be determined by the quality of education available to the 
        Nation's young people: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the 
Council of Chief State School Officers should be commended for their 
efforts to increase the rigor, utility, and comparability of State 
academic standards.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-20844 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. R O L O N D O H O M E R O M E N ENDEZ AREVALO, also known as Rolando Home ro Menendez, also known as Anjelino Vasquez, also known as Rolondo Homero Menendez-Arevalo, also known as Rolondo Homero Menedez Arevalo, also known as Rolando Homero Menendez-Arevalo, also known as Angel Vasquez, Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

USDC No. 10-cr-00410
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Rolondo Homero Menendez Arevalo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California , 38 6 U

. S

. 738 (1967). Menendez did not file a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’ s m o t i o n for leave to withdraw is U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 24 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20844 Document: 00511767091 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2012No. 08-41325

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, a n d t h e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 10-20844 Document: 00511767091 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2012
10-K 2008 Exhibit 10.12




Exhibit 10.12


Tekelec


                  Summary of Compensation for Non-Employee Members

                  of the Board of Directors and its Committees


	
1.
	
Board of Directors - Annual Retainer
	 
	 	

Board Members (except Chairman of the Board)

	
$50,000

	 	

Chairman of the Board

	
$125,000

	 	 	 
	
2.
	
Compensation Committee - Annual Retainer
	 
	 	

Committee Members (except Committee Chairman)

	
$5,000

	 	

Compensation Committee Chairman

	
$16,000

	 	 	 
	
3.
	
Audit Committee - Annual Retainer
	 
	 	

Committee Members (except Committee Chairman)

	
$8,000

	 	

Audit Committee Chairman

	
$20,000

	 	 	 
	
4.
	
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee - Annual
Retainer
	 
	 	

Committee Members (except Committee Chairman)

	
$4,000

	 	

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman

	
$10,000

	 	 	 
	
5.
	
Corporate Development Committee - Annual Retainer
	 
	 	

Committee Members (except Committee Chairman)

	
$4,000

	 	

Corporate Development Committee Chairman

	
$10,000






The above compensation became effective as of July 1, 2008.  In addition to annual cash retainers (which are paid
on a quarterly basis), non-employee directors are eligible to receive grants of equity securities under the Company's Amended and Restated
2003 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2003 Plan").  The 2003 Plan is included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 000-15135), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2008.


*     *     *
Exhibit 10.3   THIS NOTE AND THE SECURITIES THAT MAY BE ACQUIRED ALONG WIRTH THIS NOTE HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND NOT WITH A VIEW TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THE SALE OR DISTRIBUTION THEREOF.  NO SALE, TRANSFER OR OTHER DISPOSITION MAY BE EFFECTED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATED THERETO OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL ACCEPTABLE TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.  POWRtec International Corp.  SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE  (Non-Negotiable)   $25,000.00           July 9, 2010 Cupertino, California  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, POWRtec International Corp., a Delaware corporation ("Maker") promises to pay to The Management AB ("Creditor"), at Campbell, California, or order, the principal sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000.00), together with simple interest from July 9, 2010 (the Original Loan Date) on the principal amount hereof outstanding from time to time at the rate of Sixty Percent (60%) per annum Simple. Interest computed on the basis of a 365-day year (0.1643835 percent per day) on the unpaid balance hereof shall accrue until paid. Principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable on January 9, 2011.  As additional consideration, POWRtec International Corp. shall issue Twelve Thousand Five Hundred (12,500) shares of its unregistered common stock to The Management AB. The shares will be issued as soon as practicable after receipt of funds.  Prepayment of principal, together with accrued interest, may be made, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty.  This Note is, and shall be, subordinate to all present and future borrowings of the Maker whether in the form of bank debt, lease financing or otherwise and Creditor has agreed to execute such subordination agreement or other documentation as may be required by any future lender or lessor.  In the event Maker fails to repay principal and interest on or before January 9, 2011. Maker will issue shares of its unregistered common stock at the rate of $0.50 per share in lieu thereof (65,000 shares if no cash payment has been made).  Principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of America.  This Note shall be construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of California.  POWRtec International Corp.    By: Grant Jasmin, President  Agreed: The Management AB    By:  _________________________________ Anders Sagadin
#### TEXAS OIL & GAS CORP. v. Jeff HAGEN et al.

No. C-3768.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1988.

Pursuant to this Court’s order of July 13, 1988, and the subsequent approval by the trial court of the settlement agreement of the parties, the judgment and opinion of this Court dated December 16, 1987, are withdrawn, the *judgment*of the Sixth Court of Appeals is *set aside*and the motion for rehearing and this cause are dismissed as moot.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

TDC INTERNATIONAL CORP., 

Plaintiff, 

V 

JAE L. BURNHAM, 

Defendants. 

--------------

FILE NO. 08-14792 

HON.ROBERT L.CLELAND 

SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY 

Defendant, Jae Burnham, hereby files this notice that a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy petition was 

filed on his behalf in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Michigan, on November 6, 2018. 

The case number for the said Chapter 13 Bankruptcy case is 18-04690-swd. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 

362, an automatic stay may �e in effect, pursuant to which any pending proceedings may be stayed, 

subject to any exceptions set forth in the referenced Section. Whereas the undersigned counsel does 

represent Jae Burnham in bankruptcy, she does not represent Mr. Burnham nor any other party in this 

action. This pleading merely serves the limited purpose of advising the Court and parties below of the 

aforementioned bankruptcy proceeding. 

Dated November 6, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 

SAVAGE LEGAL GROUP, P.C. r:��&r: Kimberly L. Savage (P68267) 

1483 Haslett Road 

Haslett, Michigan 48840 

(517) 515-5000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that on November 7, 2018, I served the foregoing document, with all attachments, on counsel 

of record, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. 

Case 2:08-cv-14792-RHC-MKM ECF No. 69 filed 11/07/18 PageID.695 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JO-BET, INC., GARTER BELT, INC., 

HAMILTON’S HENRY THE VIII LOUNGE,

HAMILTON’S BOGART, INC., JOHN 

HAMILTON, JOHN HAMILTON, JR., 

JEREMY HAMILTON, MICHAEL HAMILTON,

JOHN L. HAMILTON RETAINED ANNUITY Case No. 01-CV-74698

TRUST,

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

Plaintiffs, 

v.

CITY OF INKSTER, PAUL MARTIN, KENNETH 

BROWN, and ANTONY ABDULLAH,

Defendants. 

________________________________________/

ORDER AMENDING AUGUST 26, 2009, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On August 26, 2009, the Court issued a memorandum and order in which it, among

other things, dismissed the City of Inkster as a defendant and granted summary judgment

in favor of Martin, Brown, and Abdullah. On page 3 of the memorandum and order, the

paragraph beginning “Now before the Court,” the Court erroneously stated that it will be

grating summary judgment in favor of Martin and Brown “in part.” This paragraph is

AMENDED to read as follows:

“Now before the Court is the Inkster Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted.”

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 27, 2009 s/ Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2:01-cv-74698-AC Doc # 337 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 8939
01-74698 Hamilton, et al v. City of Inkster, et al

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record

on this date, August 27, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:01-cv-74698-AC Doc # 337 Filed 08/27/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 8940
No. 72-6061.

#### Evans *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sawadee Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas
E. Ford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of May, 2007.


/s/ Douglas E. Ford
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer