Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 30, 1996 / Notices 3031

subsequent delegation letters of March

29, 1982; April 5, 1985; June 2, 1987;

December 2, 1988; and February 20,

1991. Alabama sources subject to the

requirements of this subpart will now be

under the jurisdiction of Alabama.

Since review of the pertinent Alabama

laws, rules, and regulations showed

them to be adequate for the

implementation and enforcement of the

aforementioned categories of NSPS and

NESHAPs, the EPA hereby notifies the

public that it has delegated the authority

for the source categories listed above on

June 10, 1991, and November 20, 1995.

The Office of Management and Budget

has exempted this rule from the

requirements of section 6 of Executive

Order 12866.

Authority: This notice is issued under the

authority of sections 101, 110, 111, 112, and

301 of the Clean Air Act, as Amended (42

U.S.C. 7401, 7410, 7411, 7412, and 7601).

Dated: January 12, 1996.

Phyllis P. Harris,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–1717 Filed 1–29–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL–5406–9]

Accidental Release Prevention

Requirements: Risk Management

Programs Under Section 112(r)(7) of

the Clean Air Act as Amended; Draft

Guidances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

SUMMARY: Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean

Air Act (CAA), as amended, requires the

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

to develop guidance documents,

including model risk management

plans, to assist stationary sources in the

development of risk management

programs. The following three draft

guidance documents are available for

review in Docket No. A–91–73 Category

VIII–A: ‘‘Offsite Consequence

Assessment’’; ‘‘Generic Guidance Risk

Management Program (RMP) for

Ammonia Refrigeration Facilities’’; and

‘‘Risk Management Plan Data

Elements.’’ The Agency is interested in

continued dialogue on the guidances

with interested members of the public

and will issue guidance at the time it

promulgates the Risk Management

Program regulations.

DATES: Those who wish to express their

views concerning the material contained

in the guidances should submit written

comments by February 29, 1996, to

Docket A–91–73 Category VIII–B, at the

address below, or via e-mail to A-andR-Docket@epamail.epa.gov.

ADDRESSES: Docket. These documents

are in Docket A–91–73 Category VIII–A

and available for public inspection and

copying between 8 a.m. and 5:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, including all

non-Governmental holidays, at EPA’s

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center, room M1500, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency

(6102), 401 M Street SW., Washington,

DC 20460.

Electronic Access. These documents

can be accessed in electronic format

through the Internet system and through

EPA’s Technology Transfer Network

(TTN), a network of electronic bulletin

boards operated by the Office of Air

Quality Planning and Standards. The

Internet address of EPA’s gopher server

is GOPHER.EPA.GOV. This information

is also available using File Transfer

Protocol (FTP) on FTP.EPA.GOV or

using World Wide Web (WWW) (http:/

/earth1.epa.gov/ceppo). The TTN

service is free, except for the cost of a

phone call. To access the TTN, dial

(919) 541–5742 for up to a 14,400 bits

per second (bps) modem. If more

information on TTN is needed, contact

the systems operator at (919) 541–5382.

Comments and data may also be

submitted electronically by sending

electronic mail (e-mail) to: A-and-RDocket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic

comments must be submitted as ASCII

file avoiding the use of special

characters and any form of encryption.

Comments and data will also be

accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1

file format or ASCII file format. All

comments and data in electronic form

must be identified by the docket number

A–91–73 Category VIII–B. No

Confidential Business Information (CBI)

should be submitted through e-mail.

Electronic comments on this draft

guidance may be filed online at many

Federal Depository Libraries.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

technical information on the ‘‘Generic

Guidance Risk Management Program

(RMP) for Ammonia Refrigeration

Facilities’’ or the draft ‘‘Risk

Management Data Elements’’, contact

Lyse Helsing, (202) 260–6128. For

technical information on the draft

‘‘Offsite Consequence Assessment’’,

contact Craig Matthiessen, (202) 260–

9781. To order copies of these

documents, please FAX requests to the

Emergency Planning and Community

Right-to-Know Information Hotline

(Hotline) at (703) 412–3333. The Hotline

is also available to answer questions at

(800) 535–0202 or (703) 412–9877 when

calling from local Washington, DC area.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA

announces the availability of draft

guidances that will assist stationary

sources in complying with the

provisions of CAA section 112(r)(7)(B),

including the requirement to prepare

risk management plans. The documents

made available today are drafts of

guidances and would not, when

finalized, create any obligations on the

part of entities subject to CAA section

112(r)(7)(B); thus, these documents are

neither regulations nor proposed

regulations.

EPA proposed Risk Management

Program regulations to implement CAA

section 112(r)(7) on October 20, 1993

(58 FR 54190) and March 13, 1995 (60

FR 13528). For information on the

proposed regulations, please see the

above-referenced notices. Furthermore,

for information on chemicals, sources,

and processes subject to CAA section

112(r)(7), please see 40 CFR part 68 and

the notice establishing these provisions

(59 FR 4478, January 31, 1994).

The draft ‘‘Offsite Consequence

Assessment’’ guidance contains all the

methodologies and reference tables that

would be necessary to develop and

analyze the consequences of worst case

and more likely (‘‘alternative case’’)

scenarios for the regulations under CAA

section 112(r)(7)(B). This guidance is

designed to help those sources subject

to section 112(r)(7) comply with the

offsite consequence requirements

without specific expertise or access to

computer-based and more sophisticated

modeling tools. EPA contemplates that

sources will be able to use the modeling

results contained in a final guidance or

other appropriate modeling results in

complying with the section 112(r)(7)

regulations.

The draft ‘‘Generic Guidance Risk

Management Program (RMP) for

Ammonia Refrigeration Facilities’’ is a

model program and plan that will help

owners and operators of ammonia

refrigeration facilities comply with the

CAA section 112(r). The draft guidance

includes a section on hazard assessment

and on emergency response, and four

appendices: (A) Selection of scenarios;

(B) background information on

ammonia modeling; (C) effect of

ammonia releases on structures; and (D)

refrigerated ammonia release modeling.

The Risk Management Program

regulation will require submission of

risk management plans. The draft Risk

Management Data Elements maps out

the kinds of information that would be

submitted by each source as its risk

management plan. The draft includes an

executive summary, registration, data on

worst case and alternative releases for

toxics and for flammables, five-year
3032 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 30, 1996 / Notices

accident history, prevention program,

and emergency response program.

Dated: January 23, 1996.

Jim Makris,

Director, Chemical Emergency Preparedness

and Prevention Office.

[FR Doc. 96–1706 Filed 1–29–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL–5406–8]

Regulatory Reinvention (XL) Pilot

Projects: XL Community Pilot Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice correction.

On December 12, 1995 the

Environmental Protection Agency

published the Federal Register Notice

60 FR 63711 (FRL–5344–5) in error.

Please refer to the November 1, 1995

Federal Register Notice 60 FR 55569

(FRL–5322–9) for the correct and

complete description of the XL

Community (XLC) Pilot Program.

Additional information on the XL

Community Pilot Program may be

obtained by calling 703–934–3241. To

request that XLC documents be sent or

faxed please call the XL program’s

automated telephone system at 202–

260–8590.

Dated: January 19, 1996.

John Wilson,

OPPE/OSEC.

[FR Doc. 96–1714 Filed 1–29–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL–5407–7]

Underground Injection Control

Program: Class I Non-Hazardous

Waste Disposal Injection Restrictions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant a caseby-case extension.

The U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency is granting the request from

Abbott Laboratories, Wichita, Kansas,

for a case-by-case extension of the RCRA

land disposal restriction (LDR)

treatment standards applicable to total

organic carbon (TOC), EPA Hazard Code

D001. This final decision provides for a

one year extension period beginning

September 19, 1995, and allows Abbott

to continue injecting its wastestream

into their Underground Injection

Control (UIC) Class I injection well until

September 19, 1996. This extension is

granted under the provisions found in

40 CFR 148.4. This extension will allow

the Environmental Protection Agency to

complete the review of Abbott’s NoMigration Petition application. The

basis for approval includes the

following demonstrations:

40 CFR 268.5(a)(1) Abbott

Laboratories has made a good-faith

effort on a nationwide basis to locate

and contract for adequate alternative

treatment, recovery, or disposal

capacity, or establish such capacity by

the effective date of the applicable

restrictions.

40 CFR 268.5(a)(2) Abbott

Laboratories has entered into a binding

contractual commitment to provide

alternative treatment, recovery, or

disposal capacity.

40 CFR 268.5(a)(3) Abbott

Laboratories has shown the lack of

alternative capacity is beyond its

control.

40 CFR 268.5(a)(4) Abbott

Laboratories has shown that there will

be adequate alternative treatment,

recovery, or disposal capacity for all

waste after the effective date established

by the extension.

40 CFR 268.5(a)(5) Abbott

Laboratories has provided a detailed

schedule for obtaining alternative

capacity including dates.

40 CFR 268.5(a)(6) Abbott

Laboratories has arranged for adequate

capacity to manage waste during the

extension period.

40 CFR 268.5(a)(7) No surface

impoundments or landfills will be used

by Abbott Laboratories to manage the

waste during the extension period.

This case-by-case extension is only for

the waste code impacted by the

September 19, 1994 Land Disposal

Restrictions, Phase II and is valid for as

long as the basis for granting an

extension remains valid, under

provisions of 40 CFR Part 124.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

information contact Robert L. Morby,

Chief Drinking Water/Groundwater

Management Branch, EPA-Region 7 or

telephone (913) 551–7682.

Dated: December 14, 1995.

Dennis Grams,

Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–1716 Filed 1–29–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Public Information Collection

Approved by Office of Management

and Budget

January 22, 1996.

The Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) has received Office

of Management and Budget (OMB)

approval for the following public

information collection pursuant to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub.

L. 96–511. An agency may not conduct

or sponsor and a person is not required

to respond to a collection of information

unless it displays a currently valid

control number. For further information

contact Dorothy Conway, Federal

Communications Commission, (202)

418–0217.

Federal Communications Commission

OMB Control No.: 3060–0689.

Expiration Date: 3/31/96.

Title: Market Entry and Regulations of

Foreign-Affiliated Entities.

Estimated Annual Burden: 4,127 total

annual hours; average 8 hours per

respondent; 431 respondents.

Description: The information required

by 47 CFR Part 63 and Sections 214 and

310(b)(4) of the Communications Act of

1934 as amended, is needed to regulate

the entry of foreign carriers into the U.S.

international service market. In

addition, this information is needed in

order to regulate carriers in their

provision of international service.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0683.

Expiration Date: 1/31/99.

Title: Direct Broadcast Satellite

Service 47 CFR Section 100 (Proposed

Rule).

Estimated Annual Burden: 3,200 total

annual hours; average 400 hours per

respondent; 8 respondents.

Description: The Commission

proposes to require the DBS auction

winners submit (1) ownership

information to determine compliance

with Parts 1 and 100 of the

Commission’s rules; (2) a statement

describing efforts to comply with the

proposed spectrum limitations; (3) an

explanation of the terms and conditions

and party parties involved with any

bidding consortia, joint venture,

partnership, other agreement or

arrangement they enter into reltating to

the competitive bidding process prior to

the close of bidding; and (4) any

agreements or contracts pertaining to

the transfer of the DBS authorization

acquired through actions during the six

years following the grant of the

authorization.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0685.

Expiration Date: 2/29/96.

Title: Annual Updating of Maximum

Permitted Rates for Regulated Cable

Service FCC Form 1240.

Estimated Annual Burden: 116,438

total annual hours; average 15 hours per

respondent; 5,850 respondents.

Description: The Commission has

created the FCC Form 1240 Annual