alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 1 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 2 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 3 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 4 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 5 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 6 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 7 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 8 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 9 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 10 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 11 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 12 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 13 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 14 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 15 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 16 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 17 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 18 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 19 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 20 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 21 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 22 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 23 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 24 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 25 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 26 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 27 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 28 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 29 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 30 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 31 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 32 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 33 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 34 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 35 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 36 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 37 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 38 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 39 of 40
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66 Filed 11/19/10 Page 40 of 40
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-3798EM

_____________

Sheri Sutton, for Nicola J. Sutton, a *

minor, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Social Security Administration, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: April 17, 1998

Filed: April 22, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Sheri Sutton, for Nicola J. Sutton, a minor, appeals the district court's grant of

summary judgment affirming the Social Security Commissioner's denial of Sutton's

application for child's survivor's benefits. Having reviewed the record and the parties'

briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack

precedential value. We affirm the district court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
No. 07-20-00358-CR

Jamie Lee Burns a/k/a Jamie Lee Nelson Appellant From the 316th District Court of Hutchinson County

v. September 30, 2021 The State of Texas Appellee § § § § Opinion by Chief Justice Quinn J U D G M E N T Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 30, 2021, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that have already been paid are adjudged. It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance. o O o
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Department 
of Energy/Los Alamos National Laboratory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Public Law 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Committee meeting: Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Los Alamos National Laboratory

DATES: Tuesday, July 9, 1996: 6:30 pm-9:30 pm; 7:00 pm to 7:30 pm 
(public comment session).

ADDRESSES: Northern New Mexico Community College, 1002 N. Onate, 
Espanola, New Mexico 87532, 505-753-8970.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kimberly Roybal, Los Alamos 
National Laboratory Citizens' Advisory Board Support, Northern New 
Mexico Community College, 1002 Onate Street, Espanola, NM 87352, (800) 
753-8970, or (505) 753-8970, or (505) 262-1800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Advisory Board is to make recommendations to DOE and its regulators in 
the areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.

Tentative Agenda

Tuesday, July 9, 1996

6:30 PM Call to Order and Welcome
7:00 PM Public Comment
7:30 PM Old Business
8:30 PM Sub-Committee Reports
9:30 PM Adjourn

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Ms. Lisa Roybal, at the telephone number 
listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior to the meeting and 
reasonable provision will be made to include the presentation in the 
agenda. The Designated Federal Official is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business. This notice is being published less than 15 days in advance 
of the meeting due to programmatic issues that needed to be resolved.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Herman Le-Doux, 
Department of Energy, Los Alamos Area Office, 528 35th Street, Los 
Alamos, NM 87185-5400.

    Issued at Washington, DC on June 25, 1996.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-16562 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, Jane A. Freeman,
certify that: 1.
  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of
  Scientific Learning Corporation;2.
  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
  any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
  which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
  covered by this report;3.
  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
  other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
  material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
  flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
  The registrants other certifying officer and I are
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
  procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
  under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
  registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
  others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
  report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
  disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
  procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
  evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
  the registrants fourth fiscal quarter of 2003 that has materially affected,
  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
  control over financial reporting; and5.
  The registrants other certifying officer and I have
  disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
  the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material
  weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
  reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
  involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
  registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 26, 2004 /s/ Jane A. FreemanJane A. FreemanSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3617 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3617

 To amend the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 relating 
                to metric highway signing requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 1996

  Mr. Duncan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 relating 
                to metric highway signing requirements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,  That section 205(c)(2) 
of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 (23 U.S.C. 109 
note; 109 Stat. 577) is amended by striking ``Before September 30, 
2000, the'' and inserting ``The''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
****(COLUMNAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE DATA)****
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,013
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,198
<PP&E>                                         237,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                 111,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,418
<BONDS>                                        105,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,308
<SALES>                                        190,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,954
<CGS>                                          154,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                45,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (18,810)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (897)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (19,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.57)


</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16913]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32, 383]

OshKosh B'Gosh, Red Boiling Springs, Tennessee; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on March 27, 1995 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at OshKosh B'Gosh, Red Boiling Springs, 
Tennessee.
    All workers of the subject firm are covered under amended 
certification (TA-W-31, 543A). Consequently, further investigation in 
this case would serve no purpose; and the investigation has been 
terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 13th day of June, 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-16913 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD DAVIS,

Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-CV-14552-DT

vs.

 DISTRICT JUDGE MARIANNE O. BATTANI

GLADWIN, COUNTY OF, MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB

et. al,

Defendants.

________________________/

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion to Compel filed by Defendants Nurse

Laura E. Sasse and Nurse Jim Jaunese filed on July 2, 2009. (Docket no. 52). Plaintiff has not

responded, and the time for responding has now expired. All pretrial matters have been referred to

the undersigned for decision. (Docket no. 4). The Court dispenses with oral argument on this

motion. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e). Defendants’ motion is now ready for ruling.1

Defendants served their Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents upon

Plaintiff on April 1, 2009. (Docket no. 52 exs. A & B). Defendants state that as of July 2, 2009,

Plaintiff has not responded to these discovery requests. (Id. at 2). They seek an order compelling

Plaintiff to respond with complete answers and, should Plaintiff fail to do so, an order dismissing

this action. (Id.).

1

 Other Defendants filed a “Joinder” to this motion. (Docket no. 53). However, that

document seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to respond to Interrogatories and Requests to

Admit different from those at issue in the present motion. Moreover, in violation of E.D. Mich.

LR 37.2, that document fails to attach a copy of the discovery at issue. This Order does not

address that document.

2:08-cv-14552-MOB-MKM Doc # 57 Filed 08/11/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 406
Plaintiff was required to respond to these discovery requests within 30 days after service. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(2), 34(b)(2)(A). Plaintiff failed to respond within that period. Because

Plaintiff also did not respond to Defendants’ motion, the motion is unopposed. By not filing any

proper objections during the response period, Plaintiff has waived any objections to the discovery. 

The Court will therefore grant Defendants’ Motion to Compel.

Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action

with prejudice.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Compel (docket no. 52) is

GRANTED. Plaintiff shall on or before August 26, 2009 submit to Defendants’ counsel full and

complete responses, without objection, to Defendants’ Interrogatories and Requests for Production

of Documents served on April 1, 2009.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), the parties have a period of ten days from the date of

this Order within which to file any written appeal to the District Judge as may be permissible

under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Dated: August 11, 2009 s/ Mona K. Majzoub 

MONA K. MAJZOUB

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of this Opinion and Order was served upon Richard Davis

and Counsel of Record on this date.

Dated: August 11, 2009 s/ Lisa C. Bartlett 

Courtroom Deputy

-2-

2:08-cv-14552-MOB-MKM Doc # 57 Filed 08/11/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 407
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15836]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-219-OLA; ASLBP No. 96-717-02-OLA]


General Public Utility Nuclear Corp.; Establishment of Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28710 (1972), and Sections 
2.105, 2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717, 2.721 of the Commission's 
Regulations, all as amended, an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board is 
being established to preside over the following proceeding.

General Public Utility Nuclear Corporation

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

    This Board is being established pursuant to a notice published by 
the Commission on May 8, 1996, in the Federal Register (61 FR 20842). 
The notice reports a proposed determination by the Staff that the 
issuance of a license amendment to the General Public Utility Nuclear 
Corporation for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station would 
involve no significant hazards consideration. The amendment would 
revise the technical specifications to allow the handling of loads 
greater than the weight of one fuel assembly over the irradiated fuel 
in the spent fuel storage facility. The petitioners, Nuclear 
Information and Resource Service, Oyster Creek Nuclear Watch and 
Citizens Awareness Network, seek to intervene and request a hearing on 
the grounds that the change would present a significant increase in the 
risk probability of an accident.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

G. Paul Bollwerk, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Charles N. Kelber, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555
Peter S. Lam, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555

    All correspondence, documents and other materials shall be filed 
with the Judges in accordance with 10 CFR Sec. 2.701.

    Issued at Rockville, MD, this 14th day of June 1996.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr.
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 96-15836 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATE OF AMERICA,

Case Number: 09-10074

Plaintiff,

Honorable: Robert H. Cleland

VS. Claim Number: 1999A17962

DORCAS L. WALLACE AKA DORCUS L. BURM,

Defendant,

_____________________________/

PAMELA S. RITTER (P47886)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Holzman Ritter & Leduc PLLC.

28366 Franklin Road

Southfield, MI 48034

(248) 352-4340

______________________________/

ORDER FOR WAGE ASSIGNMENT

At a session of said Court, held in the City of Detroit, 

Wayne County Michigan on January 30, 2009

Present: HONORABLE_Robert H Cleland_____

 U.S. District Court Judge

In accordance with the Stipulation of the parties: It is hereby ordered that

MCLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER deduct the sum of $100.00 per pay

from the wages of said defendant, DORCAS L. WALLACE AKA DORCUS L.

BURM, social security number: XXX-XX- 8919 and transmit such sum to:

U.S. Department of Justice

NCIF

P.O. Box 70932

Charlotte, NC 28272-0932

Please include account number 1999A17962

2:09-cv-10074-RHC-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 01/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 16
This wage assignment is to remain in effect until the balance of $4,867.77

plus accruing interest is satisfied. The office of HOLZMAN RITTER & LEDUC

PLLC., Attorney for UNITED STATES OF AMERICA will notify MCLAREN

REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER when the remaining balance is less than

$100.00 so that no overpayment is created. 

A copy of this order is to be served upon MCLAREN REGIONAL

MEDICAL CENTER Payroll Department.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: January 30, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of

record on this date, January 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

 Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:09-cv-10074-RHC-MKM Doc # 7 Filed 01/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALEX SAVCHUK,

Case No. 08-14400

Petitioner, Honorable David M. Lawson

v.

DOCTOR LAYDUM,

Respondent,

___________________________________________/

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the opinion and order denying petition for writ of habeas corpus entered

this date, 

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

s/David M. Lawson 

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 3, 2010

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 3, 2010..

s/Teresa Scott-Feijoo 

TERESA SCOTT-FEIJOO