alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO





18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO





SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CTI Industries Corporation
(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Howard W.
Schwan, as President of the Company, and Stephen M. Merrick, as Executive
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Howard W. SchwanHoward
      W. SchwanPresidentDate:
      March 29, 2010/s/ Stephen M. MerrickStephen
      M. MerrickExecutive
      Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer





Date:
March 29, 2010





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 10(R-3)

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                  INCENTIVE PLAN FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
                              OF EMCOR GROUP, INC.


     This Amendment to the Incentive Plan for Senior Executive Officers of EMCOR
Group, Inc. (the "Plan") is made February 27, 2008.

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended by
the Board of Directors of EMCOR Group, Inc. (the "Company"); and

     WHEREAS, on the date hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company
unanimously voted pursuant to a motion duly made and seconded to amend the Plan.

     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended so that the second sentence of
Section 6.2(a) is amended by adding the following provision at end thereof ";
provided, however, when value of a Participant's Phantom Stock Units is
determined with reference to a Distribution Date which is the second anniversary
of an Allocation Date referred to in clause (i) of the preceding sentence, such
value shall be determined (A) with respect to Phantom Stock Unit awards made in
respect of calendar year 2006, by multiplying the number of Phantom Stock Units
in the Participant's Phantom Stock Unit Account by the higher of (x) the Fair
Market Value of a share of Company Stock on March 5, 2009 and (y) the average of
the closing price of a share of Company Stock on the New York Stock Exchange for
each of the 10 trading days immediately following the day on which the Company
files with the Securities and Exchange Commission its Form 10-K for 2008, and
(B) with respect to Phantom Stock Unit awards made in respect of calendar years
subsequent to 2006 by multiplying the number of Phantom Stock Units in the
Participant's Phantom Stock Unit Account by the average of the closing price of
a share of Company Stock for each of the 10 trading days immediately following
the day on which the Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Form 10-K for the calendar year immediately preceding the second anniversary
of the applicable Allocation Date."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment on the date
first written above.

                                         EMCOR GROUP, INC.


                                         By /S/ R. KEVIN MATZ
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            R. Kevin Matz
                                            Executive Vice President -
                                            Shared Services
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30051-30052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15068]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30052]]


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and 
Universities; Meeting

AGENCY: President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges 
and Universities, Education.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and agenda of the meeting 
of the President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and 
Universities. This notice also describes the functions of the Board. 
Notice of this meeting is required under Section 10(a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATE AND TIME: June 27, 1996 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. and June 28, 1996 
from 9:00 a.m to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Park Hyatt Hotel located at 
1201 24th Street NW, Washington, D.C. Call (202) 708-8667 for further 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Davis, White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and 
Universities, U.S. Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, 
SW, The Portals Building, Suite 605, Washington, DC 20202-5120. 
Telephone: (202) 708-8667.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The President's Board of Advisors on 
Historically Black Colleges and Universities is to issue an annual 
report to the President on HBCU participation in Federal programs, and 
to advise the Secretary of Education on increasing the private sector 
role in strengthening HBCUs.
    The meeting of the Board is open to the public. The meeting will be 
primarily devoted to discussion of the reauthorization of the Higher 
Education Act and other higher education issues.
    Records are kept of all Board proceedings, and are available for 
public inspection at the White House Initiative on Historically Black 
Colleges and Universities located at 1250 Maryland Avenue, S.W., The 
Portals Building, Suite 605, Washington, DC 20202, from the hours of 
8:30 am to 5:00 pm.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 96-15068 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3605 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3605

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exemption 
  from tax for State funds providing coverage for losses on property 
                       arising from earthquakes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 10, 1996

   Mr. Lewis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exemption 
  from tax for State funds providing coverage for losses on property 
                       arising from earthquakes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF EXEMPTION FROM TAX FOR STATE FUNDS 
              PROVIDING COVERAGE FOR LOSSES ON PROPERTY ARISING FROM 
              EARTHQUAKES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 501 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption from tax on corporations, 
certain trusts, etc.) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(26) Any organization or fund--
                    ``(A) which is established by a State solely to 
                provide coverage on a not-for-profit basis for losses 
                arising from earthquakes on property located within 
                such State, and
                    ``(B) no part of the net earnings of which inures 
                to the benefit of any private shareholder or 
                individual.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Eugene Devere NEWCOMER, Appellant, v. Diane Groh NEWCOMER, Respondent.

No. 68080.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Southern Division.

July 23, 1996.

David S. Limbaugh, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.

Richard G. Steele, Stephen C. Christian-sen, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and AHRENS and DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Eugene Devere Newcomer appeals the trial court’s awarding of maintenance to Diane Groh Newcomer. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Exhibit 2 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 34
DEFENSE_015288

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 2 of 34
DEFENSE_015289

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 3 of 34
DEFENSE_015290

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 4 of 34
DEFENSE_015291

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 5 of 34
DEFENSE_015292

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 6 of 34
DEFENSE_015293

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 7 of 34
DEFENSE_015294

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 8 of 34
DEFENSE_015295

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 9 of 34
DEFENSE_015296

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 10 of 34
DEFENSE_015297

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 11 of 34
DEFENSE_015298

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 12 of 34
DEFENSE_015299

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 13 of 34
DEFENSE_015300

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 14 of 34
DEFENSE_015301

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 15 of 34
DEFENSE_015302

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 16 of 34
DEFENSE_015303

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 17 of 34
DEFENSE_015304

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 18 of 34
DEFENSE_015305

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 19 of 34
DEFENSE_015306

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 20 of 34
DEFENSE_015307

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 21 of 34
DEFENSE_015308

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 22 of 34
DEFENSE_015309

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 23 of 34
DEFENSE_015310

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 24 of 34
DEFENSE_015311

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 25 of 34
DEFENSE_015312

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 26 of 34
DEFENSE_015313

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 27 of 34
DEFENSE_015314

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 28 of 34
DEFENSE_015315

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 29 of 34
DEFENSE_015316

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 30 of 34
DEFENSE_015317

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 31 of 34
DEFENSE_015318

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 32 of 34
DEFENSE_015319

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 33 of 34
DEFENSE_015320

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1393-2 Filed 11/17/21 Page 34 of 34
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16225]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-140-002]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

June 20, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 13, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) made a filing in compliance with the 
Commission's May 29, 1996, letter order in the above referenced 
proceeding (Letter Order). The Letter Order accepted and suspended, 
effective June 1, 1996, subject to refund and the conditions therein, 
tariff sheets representing Columbia's second filing to recover Accrued-
But-Not-Paid Gas Costs pursuant to its settlement in Docket No. GP94-2-
000, et al., 71 FERC para. 61,337 (1995). The Letter Order directed 
Columbia to make supporting documentation available to parties within 
15 days of the date of the Letter Order, and redesignated the original 
docket number assigned to the second filing (RP96-222) to RP96-140-002.
    Columbia states that it is filing supporting documentation for its 
first and second filings to recover Accrued-But-Not-Paid Gas Costs in 
Docket Nos. RP96-140 and RP96-140-002, respectively, under seal, and is 
requesting that such documentation receive privileged and confidential 
treatment pursuant to 18 CFR 388.112 and remain exempt from public 
disclosure. Columbia previously explained in an April 11, 1996 
compliance letter in Docket No. RP96-140 its concerns regarding the 
public disclosure of documentation supporting its filing to recover 
Accrued-But-Not-Paid Gas Costs, which explanation forms the basis for 
the request for privileged and confidential treatment.
    Columbia states that it has negotiated a protective agreement 
arrangement with interested parties pursuant to which Columbia has 
agreed to provide supporting documentation.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
firm customers, affected state commissions and interruptible customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided by Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16225 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

LEANNE S. SMITH,

Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 10-14770

Judge Bernard A. Friedman

-v- Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the defendant, Commissioner of Social Security, shall have

an extension of time until June 13, 2011 to file his Response and Motion for Summary

Judgment. Plaintiff's reply is due June 23, 2011.

s/R. Steven Whalen

R. STEVEN WHALEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: May 13, 2011

______________________________________________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify on May 13, 2011 that I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk

of the Court sending notification of such filing to all counsel registered electronically. I hereby

certify that a copy of this paper was mailed to the following non-registered ECF participants on May

13, 2011: None.

s/Michael E. Lang 

Deputy Clerk to 

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

(313) 234-5217

2:08-cv-14950-AJT-MKM Doc # 28 Filed 07/23/13 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 783
1The court is inclined to grant Plaintiff additional time, within reasonable

limitations. 

2The parties are free to engage in voluntary discovery by agreement.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 

THOMAS M. BEAUDOIN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-CV-14289-DT

DONALD McGEHEE, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER MEMORIALIZING DATES AND 

SUSPENDING COURT-SUPERVISED DISCOVERY

On June 1, 2009, the court conducted a scheduling conference, on the record,

with pro se Plaintiff Thomas M. Beaudoin and counsel for Defendants. During the

conference, counsel for the state Defendants indicated that he anticipated filing a

motion to dismiss by June 12, 2009. If counsel files a motion by such date, the local

rules provide that Plaintiff will have until July 7, 2009 to respond. If, however, upon

receipt of the motion, Plaintiff desires additional time, he may so request by contacting

the court’s case manager, Lisa Wagner, at (313) 234-5522.1

 In the meantime, with the

exception of Defendant Grant, the parties will suspend discovery pending resolution of

the motion to dismiss. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that court-supervised discovery is SUSPENDED until further

order of the court2

 with the exception of discovery regarding Plaintiff’s claims against

Defendant Grant. 

2:08-cv-14289-RHC-MKM Doc # 27 Filed 06/02/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 177
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\08-14289.BEAUDOIN.MemorializingDates.chd.wpd

2

The court will determine whether a hearing on the anticipated motion to dismiss

is necessary after receiving Plaintiff’s response. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: June 2, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, June 2, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522

2:08-cv-14289-RHC-MKM Doc # 27 Filed 06/02/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 178
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER96-1631-000]


Family Fiber Connection; Notice of Issuance of Order

June 24, 1996.
    Family Fiber Connection (FFC) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which FFC will engage in wholesale electric power and energy 
transactions as a marketer. FFC also requested waiver of various 
Commission regulations. In particular, FFC requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by FFC.
    On June 12, 1996, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by FFC should file a motion to intervene or 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, FFC is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of FFC's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is July 12, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16535 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

 Defendants Michael Lacey, James Larkin, John Brunst, and Scott Spear (the 

“Defendants”) filed a joinder (the “Joinder”) to Defendants Andrew Padilla and Joye 

Vaught’s Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Joinder in Defendant 

Padilla and Vaught’s Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request 

for Immediate Hearing (Doc. 360) (the “Emergency Motion”). (Doc. 366) In the Joinder, 

the Defendants request additional relief outside of the scope of the Emergency Motion. 

Specifically, the Defendants request for the Court to extend its Order temporarily granting 

the Emergency Motion to include “all counsel trust accounts being held for representation 

of Defendants.” (Doc. 366 at 4) The Court finds that the new and additional relief requested 

by the Joinder is improper as incompliant with Rule 47 and Rule 12 of the Federal Rules 

of Criminal Procedure. Fed. R. Crim. P. 47; Fed. R. Crim. P. 12. For this reason, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Joinder In Emergency Motion To Stay Seizure 

Of Attorneys’ Fees And Request To Extend Temporary Relief (Doc. 366) is permitted 

solely to the extent of allowing the Defendants to join in the limited relief requested in 

United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 375 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Defendants Andrew Padilla and Joye Vaught’s Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of 

Attorneys’ Fees and Joinder in Defendant Padilla and Vaught’s Emergency Motion to Stay 

Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for Immediate Hearing (Doc. 360); 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remainder of Defendants’ Joinder In 

Emergency Motion To Stay Seizure Of Attorneys’ Fees And Request To Extend 

Temporary Relief (Doc. 366) is stricken. 

 Dated this 13th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 375 Filed 11/13/18 Page 2 of 2