alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 18.1



March 30, 2009



Board of Directors
Sun American Bancorp



We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of Sun American Bancorp and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, and have reported thereon under date of March 30, 2009. The aforementioned consolidated financial statements and our audit report thereon are included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

As stated in notes to those financial statements, the Company changed its method of applying Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, such that the annual impairment testing date relating to goodwill was changed from December 31st to November 30th and states that the newly adopted accounting principle is preferable in the circumstances because it will allow the Company more time to accurately complete its impairment testing process in order to incorporate the results in its annual financial statements and timely file those statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with its filing requirements. In response to your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment and planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, professional standards have not been established for selecting among or evaluating the preferability of alternative accounting methods. Accordingly, we are furnishing this letter solely for purposes of the Companys compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and it should not be used or relied on for any other purpose.

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on managements business judgment and planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Companys circumstances.





Very truly yours,



/s/ Carr, Riggs & Ingram, LLC



Dothan, Alabama
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Bennet P. Tchaikovsky                    |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|               | Bennet P. Tchaikovsky                        |
|               | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|               | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of
the Corporation.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    GREGORY S. WEISHAR                            
|Gregory S. Weishar                                   
|Chief Executive Officer and Director October 29, 2009
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      October 27, 2010 | /s/ Bennet P.Tchaikovsky                         |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Bennet      P. Tchaikovsky                       |
|                        | Chief      Financial Officer                     |
|                        | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

----
Filed 9/9/20 P. v. Reyes CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FIDEL LUCAS REYES,

Defendant and Appellant. G058976

(Super. Ct. No. 07CF1113)

O P I N I O N

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Kimberly

Menninger, Judge. Affirmed.

Susan S. Bauguess, under appointment by th e Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

* * *2 In 2009, a jury convicted defendant Fidel Lucas Ramirez of crimes

involving sex offenses against more than one child. The trial court imposed an aggregate

sentence of 30 years to life. On appeal, this court generally affirmed the judgment with

minor corr ections to the abstract of judgment. (See People v. Reyes (Jan. 27, 2011,

G041773) [nonpub. opn.].)

In 2020, defendant filed a petition for resentencing claiming he was

convicted of murder. (Pen. Code, § 1170.95.) The trial court summarily denied the

p etition because defendant was not convicted of murder.

Defendant filed an appeal. This court appointed counsel, who filed a brief

setting forth the procedural facts. Counsel advised this court that no identifiable issues

on appeal could be ascertained, but counsel raised one potential issue: whether the trial

court had abused its discretion. ( Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 ( Anders );

People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ).) Defendant filed a supplemental brief

on his own behalf. Defend ant did not address the merits of his appeal, but simply argued

that he was entitled to Anders/Wende review.

We have conducted an independent review of the record and we have found

no arguable issues that require briefing or argument. Accordingly, the or der denying

defendant’s petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95 is affirmed.

MOORE, ACTING P. J.

WE CONCUR:

ARONSON, J.

IKOLA, J.
2:09-cv-10708-GCS-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 02/26/09 Pg 1 of 3 Pg ID 36
2:09-cv-10708-GCS-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 02/26/09 Pg 2 of 3 Pg ID 37
2:09-cv-10708-GCS-RSW Doc # 3 Filed 02/26/09 Pg 3 of 3 Pg ID 38
EXHIBIT 8 
EXHIBIT 8 

Objectionable Fees 

Gabrielle Frampton Travel Time 

Date Attorney Time Fee 

01/07/2009 Frampton 3.0 750.00

05/28/2009 Frampton 3.0 750.00

06/23/2009 Frampton 3.5 875.00

06/30/2009 Frampton 1.5 375.00

07/17/2009 Frampton 3.0 750.00

08/06/2009 Frampton 3.0 750.00

Grand Total 17.00 $4,250.00

264250
Second Amendment to 2007 Incentive Equity Plan



 Exhibit 10(eee) 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 2007 INCENTIVE EQUITY PLAN 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made this 31 day of
December, 2008, by Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (the “Company”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company, with the approval of the Company’s Board of Directors on March 13, 2007 and the approval of the Company’s
shareholders on July 27, 2007, established the 2007 Incentive Equity Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of March 13, 2007; and 
 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Company to amend such Plan in order to clarify certain provisions of the Plan in order to ensure compliance of such Plan with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has the power to amend the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of March 13, 2007, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
 (1)
The last paragraph of Section 5.2(c) is hereby amended by the deletion of such last paragraph and the substitution in lieu thereof of a new last paragraph of Section 5.2(c) to read as follows: 
 “If the Exercise Price of a NQSO is paid by tendering Restricted Shares, then a portion of the Shares received upon the exercise
equal in number to the number of tendered Restricted Shares will contain identical restrictions as the Restricted Shares so tendered. Except as otherwise provided by law and in the Committee’s sole discretion, required tax withholding may be
paid only by cash or through a same day sale transaction.” 







 (2) The first sentence of Section 7.2 is hereby amended by the deletion of such first sentence and
the substitution in lieu thereof of a new first sentence of Section 7.2 to read as follows: 
 “Stock Appreciation
Rights may be granted in conjunction with, and at the same time as, all or part of any Stock Option granted under this Plan and will be subject to the following terms and conditions:” 
 (3) Section 11.2(c) is hereby amended by the deletion of such Section and the substitution in lieu thereof of a new Section 11.2(c) to read as
follows: 
 “(c) subject to the restrictions of Internal Revenue Code section 409A, any other absence determined by the
Committee in its discretion not to constitute a break in service.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment
to be executed this 31 day of December, 2008. 
  

			
	CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ William A. Brake
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 365

To apply the antitrust laws of the United States to major league baseball.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To apply the antitrust laws of the United States to major

league baseball.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Fans and

5 Communities Protection Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO MAJOR

7 LEAGUE BASEBALL IN EXCEPTIONAL AND EX8 TRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES.

9 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

10 by adding at the end the following:
2

•HR 365 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 27. (a) If unilateral terms and conditions of

2 employment in restraint of trade or commerce are imposed

3 by any party that has been subject to an agreement be4 tween 2 or more major league baseball clubs and the labor

5 organization representing the players of major league

6 baseball, such unilateral imposition shall be subject to the

7 antitrust laws.

8 ‘‘(b) Subsection (a) shall not apply to a term or con9 dition imposed solely with respect to a professional base10 ball player who is a party to a uniform player contract

11 that is assigned, at the time the imposition described in

12 such subsection occurs, to a baseball club that is not a

13 major league professional baseball club.

14 ‘‘(c) This section shall not be construed to modify,

15 impair, or supersede the operation of—

16 ‘‘(1) the Act of September 30, 1961 (Public

17 Law 87–331; 15 U.S.C. 1291 et seq.), or

18 ‘‘(2) any Federal statute relating to labor rela19 tions.

20 ‘‘(d) For purposes of this section, the term ‘terms

21 and conditions’ does not include a strike or a lockout.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 131 (Monday, July 8, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35772-35773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of a 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: The Use of Transgenic Model Systems in Molecular 
Toxicology.

[[Page 35773]]

    Date: July 23-24, 1996.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
South Campus, Building 101, Conference Center 101-C, Research 
Triangle Park, NC.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carol Shreffler, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1445.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
this meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: July 1, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-17211 Filed 7-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JAMES JACKSON on behalf of JJ, a minor,

and JJ, a minor,

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICK CALDWELL, NATHANIEL

FOUNTAIN, and JOHN DOE, DEA Agents

& Detroit Police Officers,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. 09-10041

Honorable Patrick J. Duggan

OPINION AND ORDER

 At a session of said Court, held in the U.S.

District Courthouse, Eastern District 

of Michigan, on November 19, 2009.

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

James Jackson, a federal prisoner, filed this civil action on behalf of his minor daughter

J.J. on January 6, 2009. The complaint alleges that defendants—all federal agents—

unlawfully detained, traumatized, and held J.J. hostage during a search of plaintiffs’ home.

On January 12, 2009, this Court referred all pre-trial matters in this case to Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder. On March 4, 2009, Magistrate Judge Binder granted motions by Jackson

to appoint counsel for J.J. The case was referred to the Court’s pro bono committee which

then located an attorney who agreed to interview Jackson. That interview took place in

August 2009. In September 2009, however, the attorney notified the Court that he would be

2:09-cv-10041-PJD-CEB Doc # 17 Filed 11/19/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 55
2

unable to assist with the case.

On October 19, 2009, Magistrate Judge Binder issued a Report and Recommendation

(R&R) recommending that this Court dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice because Jackson

cannot appear pro se on behalf of his minor daughter and she remains without legal

representation. At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Binder advises that the

parties may object to and seek review of the R&R within ten days of service upon them.

(R&R at 3.) He further specifically advises the parties that “[f]ailure to file specific

objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal.” ( Id.) No objections were

filed.

The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached

by Magistrate Judge Binder.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies to:

James Jackson

#25330039

FCI Ashland

P.O. Box 6001

Ashland, KY 41105

2:09-cv-10041-PJD-CEB Doc # 17 Filed 11/19/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 56
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-17017]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL BANKRUPTCY REVIEW COMMISSION


Meeting

AGENCY: National Bankruptcy Review Commission

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATES: Thursday, July 18, 1996; 9 A.M. to 4:45 P.M. and 
Friday, July 19, 1996; 8:30 A.M. to 2:30 P.M.

PLACE: Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, Federal Judicial 
Center/Education Center, One Columbus Circle, NE., Washington, DC 
20544. The public should enter through the South Lobby entrance of the 
Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: General administrative matters for the 
Commission, including substantive agenda; Commission working groups 
will consider the following substantive matters: improving jurisdiction 
and procedure; consumer bankruptcy; Chapter 11: uses and consequences; 
small businesses and partnerships: a special case?; government as 
creditor or debtor; mass torts, future claims, and bankruptcy; service 
to the estate: ethical and economic choices; the global economy: 
preparing for transnational insolvencies. An open forum for public 
participation will be held on July 18, 1996 from 11:15 a.m. to 12 p.m.

CONTACT PERSONS FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Susan Jensen-Conklin 
or Carmelita Pratt at the National Bankruptcy Review Commission, 
Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle, NE., 
Suite G-350, Washington, DC 20544; Telephone Number: (202) 273-1813.
Susan Jensen-Conklin,
Deputy Counsel.
[FR Doc. 96-17017 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-36-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAI International, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Victor M. Garcia, Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 7, 2008



/s/ VICTOR M. GARCIAVictor M. GarciaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 1 of 27 Pg ID 3422
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 2 of 27 Pg ID 3423
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 3 of 27 Pg ID 3424
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 4 of 27 Pg ID 3425
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 5 of 27 Pg ID 3426
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 6 of 27 Pg ID 3427
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 7 of 27 Pg ID 3428
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 8 of 27 Pg ID 3429
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 9 of 27 Pg ID 3430
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 10 of 27 Pg ID 3431
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 11 of 27 Pg ID 3432
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 12 of 27 Pg ID 3433
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 13 of 27 Pg ID 3434
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 14 of 27 Pg ID 3435
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 15 of 27 Pg ID 3436
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 16 of 27 Pg ID 3437
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 17 of 27 Pg ID 3438
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 18 of 27 Pg ID 3439
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 19 of 27 Pg ID 3440
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 20 of 27 Pg ID 3441
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 21 of 27 Pg ID 3442
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 22 of 27 Pg ID 3443
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 23 of 27 Pg ID 3444
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 24 of 27 Pg ID 3445
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 25 of 27 Pg ID 3446
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 26 of 27 Pg ID 3447
2:09-cv-10454-VAR-LJM Doc # 159-8 Filed 06/21/13 Pg 27 of 27 Pg ID 3448
#### Clarence L. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42963.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 7, 1990.

J. Bryan Allee, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and CLARK and FENNER, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from dismissal of Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).