Exhibit A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 613-1 Filed 05/24/19 Page 1 of 3
/. 

Lipsitz Green Sci e Cambria ::~ 

At?orne~sr.t La:^: 42 Delaware Avenue,5uite120,Buffalo,NewYork142023924 P7168491333 ~7168551580iNo~fc~5e~t;~e www.lglaw.com 

aau~~. ca~:b~,a.~,. —

Jame_ T. Sdme 

Heruert L Gre ~r*~o~ '~"'~"°~'S~F'°~°°e March 4 2019 lara:oe Kel ley ~ 

R~chord P. A'lelsbeck,Jr. 

Barry Nelson Cove-~ 

Roben L. Bo~ea~oz 

Thon:os Psi. M=_~cu.e 

~~~~~~~;~~,= Via Overnight Mail &Email George E. R~edei,Jr. 

JeffrEy 

~.;~F,o~P.S~~E~~,E, 

F. RP;n~ Kevin M. Rapp 

~~;e~~,~ ~'1e`'e~ h~on~a P~$efSO~ Assistant United States Attorney 

Thomas ~~''°`°`"~`"'°°`~ C Bumha~r. United States Attorney's Office 

~ondtha~ W. Bro~n~n' Sha«~ti~ H~~1, District of Arizona 

P~uIf.C~e,Gk 

~fe9~.~P~~~~~ 2 Rel~aissance Square Rebus E, Z;;Ke P°'~;~k~.~°~ke>,' 40 N. Central Avenue Suite 1 8 0 0 ~~1on6e..~ B. Mosey ~ 

K i;,";,;~A"~;;,P„e Phoenix, AZ 85004 

Lynn M. Bocl-enek ~~=e~h~.~~,=a E-Mail: kevin.rapp~usdoj.gov 

Emib; N. O~Reliy 

Richard A. ~lokese~ Ir. 

~~=''~ o ~""`` Re: United States v. Lace1, et al., 18-CR-0422- Erv.n E. McCoy*:obeli 1 

;~{f `~'B ~~~;`~~ PHX-DLR Defendant Michael Lacey's ~~cy M. Beekman 

u,<E~:e~,.Rb,~» Reciprocal Rule 16 Production 

Karolin=_ R Falres 

°FPof~;< `°~. ""`' o ~ Dear Mr. Ra pp: 

~~seFh~. 

As set forth in greater detail in the cover letter accompanying 

R~cho~d ~~~"``" D. F~~i~~y °"~s~~ Defendants' Joint Reciprocal Rule 16 Production dated March 4, 2019, 

Dane s`°""M. , s`', °°"= Defendants' Rule 16 obligations are reciprocal in nature and are therefore Pe~.~ Re6e~r_ 

~'``~,~~~~, ~,`~~~'~, limited by the government's failure to comply with its own Rule 16 

~~~E,~ ~~uoRKERs~ obligations and deadlines. Because the government has not completed its ~~ .,; - ~ ~.:,~, ~~h 

Kenn 

R' 'F,' 

l.'i. 

` ~ ' 

~,,ns 

;„~~~,E Rule 16 disclosul-es in this case 

~ Defendants are not obli g ated to make 

P°"'` '" ~ ~~'°" reciprocal disclosures at this time. See Fed. R. Crim. Proc. 16(b)(1)(A) (a 

q~ o , - o , _ of ~ ,_ ~ a defendant's Rule 16 obligations are triggered only if "the government 

p~~° ~ ~' ~ complies" with its own Rule 16 obligations). 

a _ ,~ 

~.,~„cu~, ,.;~.. , .~i. ~er<eY 

Indeed, the government's failure to timely meet its discovery 

obligations, including the failure to disclose Brady and Giglio material (which 

has been the subject of motion practice), has hobbled Defendants in their 

ability to make meaningful Rule 16 disclosures at this tithe. Nonetheless, in 

addition to the materials provided in Defendants' Joint Reciprocal Rule 16 

ProducCion, Defendant Michael Lacey hereby advises you that he intends to 

potentially use at trial: 

BUFFALO Atd HERST CHEEKTON✓AGA LOS ANGELES 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 613-1 Filed 05/24/19 Page 2 of 3
Lipsitz Green Sci e Cambria ~:~. 

1. Material produced by the government in discovery 

2. Defense Bates pages DEFLACEY000001 through DEFLACEY000048 

Mr. Lacey reserves the right ~o supplement these disclosures in response to 

the government's continuing disclosures and obligations and as additional 

materials become available to the defense. 

Very truly yours, 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA 

LLP 

_~ ,, 

~..- 

.--_'` 

- ~Paitl J. Cambria. Jr. 

Erin McCampbell Pai•is 

Attorneys for Michael Lacey 

cc: AUSA Reginald E. J ones 

(Re~inald.Jones4~usdoj.gov~ 

AUSA Andrew Stone 

(Andrew.Stone~usdo j.gov~ 

AUSA Peter Kozinets 

eter.Kozinetsnusdo i.~ov 

AUSA Margaret Perimeter 

(Mar~aret.Pei-Imeter~a,usdo j.gov~ 

AUSA John Kucera 

(Jo11n.Kucera~usdoj_gov~ 

BUFFALO AMHERST CHEEKTOWAGA LOS ANGELES 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 613-1 Filed 05/24/19 Page 3 of 3