alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Partnership Council Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Change in meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 20, 1996, the Department of Defense published a notice 
to announce a meeting of the Defense Partnership Council. (61 FR 31510-
31511) This notice is to announce that the meeting date has been 
changed to July 24, 1996. Comments should be received by July 19, 1996, 
in order to be considered at the July 24 meeting. All other information 
remains the same.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Kenneth Oprisko, Chief, Labor Relations Branch, Field Advisory 
Services Division, Defense Civilian Personnel Management Service, 1400 
Key Boulevard, Suite B-200, Arlington, VA, 22209-5144, (703) 696-6301, 
ext. 704.

    Dated: June 26, 1996.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 96-16834 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-12 Filed 11/19/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-12 Filed 11/19/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-12 Filed 11/19/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:09-cv-10454-VAR-VMM Document 66-12 Filed 11/19/10 Page 4 of 4
#### Mark Steven McCLAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 42583.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 10, 1990.

Raymond L. Legg, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and TURNAGE and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

McClain appeals the denial, after an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
CERTIFICATIONS





I, David H. Watkins, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Atna Resources Ltd. (the Company);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The Companys other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:



a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The Companys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Companys auditors any material weaknesses in internal control; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls; and



6.

The Companys other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date:

April 29, 2004





/s/ David H. Watkins



David H. Watkins

President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-20517-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

D-2 ERIK DAVID NEVAREZ,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT ONE, AND TAKING THE RULE 11

PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on May 27, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on May 28,

2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty. As of today’s date, no

party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The failure to

file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit

Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object

to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 116] is ADOPTED.

1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB Doc # 134 Filed 06/30/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 450
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilty as to count one is ACCEPTED,

and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 113] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: June 30, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on June 30, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB Doc # 134 Filed 06/30/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 451
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 122 (Monday, June 24, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32472-32473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15979]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, clarification, 
and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held from July 15 through July 18, 1996, 
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Danfords Inn, 25 East 
Broadway, Port Jefferson, New York.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. W. Frank Price, Executive Director, ATPAC, Air Traffic 
International Staff, ATX-20,800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-9313.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-

[[Page 32473]]

463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC 
to be held July 15 through July 18, 1996, at the Danfords Inn, 25 East 
Broadway, Port Jefferson, New York.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover: a continuation of the 
Committee's review of present air traffic control procedures and 
practices for standardization, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:

1. Approval of Minutes.
2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern.
3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items.
4. Report from Executive Director.
5. Items of Interest.
6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the 
space available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to 
attend and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify 
the person listed above not later than July 12, 1996. The next 
quarterly meeting of the FAA-ATPAC is planned to be held from October 
21-24, 1996, in Washington, DC.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time at the address given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 19, 1996.
W. Frank Price,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-15979 Filed 6-21-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1186 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1186

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the in the 
    home restriction for Medicare coverage of mobility devices for 
               individuals with expected long-term needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2009

Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Harkin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the in the 
    home restriction for Medicare coverage of mobility devices for 
               individuals with expected long-term needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Independent Living Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF IN THE HOME RESTRICTION FOR MEDICARE COVERAGE OF 
              MOBILITY DEVICES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH EXPECTED LONG-TERM 
              NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(n) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(n)) is amended by inserting ``or, in the case of a 
mobility device required by an individual with expected long-term need, 
used in customary settings for the purpose of normal domestic, 
vocational, or community activities'' after ``1819(a)(1))''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items furnished on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sawadee Ventures (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas E. Ford, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Douglas E. Ford
---------------------------------
Douglas E. Ford
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2008

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00371-CV

Johnie Jennings, Appellant

v.

Carolyn Bindseil, Dan Bindseil, Jannalyn Welch, Julian Welch, Allen Knodel, Betty

Knodel, Dale A. Friesenhahn, Horacio Ayala, Richard Aramendia, Daryl Payne, Melinda

Payne, Deanna S. Wilson, Rodney Wilson, D.M. Stuller, William Hall, Clyde Marbach,

Kurt Menking, Katherine Swoboda, Don Wallace, Charles Wittler, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2005-0149B, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Johnie Jennings has appealed from the judgment signed by the district court on May

30, 2006. The appellees have suggested abatement ofthis appeal because the judgment was not final

in that it failed to dispose of attorney’s fees issues. In response to a query by this Court’s clerk,

Jennings filed a letter attaching a copy of a judgment and letter signed on May 30, 2006 by the

district court. The judgment does not mention attorney’s fees, while the letter details the court’s

intended attorney’s fees awards and directs appellees’ counsel to prepare an order. The parties agree

that no order on attorney’s fees has been signed. Jennings’s counsel also stated that appellees’

attorneys intended to request the district court to reconsider its intended award of attorney’s fees and

needed a reporter’s record of the attorney’s fee proceeding in order to prepare that challenge. 
2

The parties’ representations persuade us that the judgment appealed from is not final

and that the notice of appeal was premature. We therefore abate the appeal until further order of this

Court. Appellees are ordered to file a report with this Court monthly on or before the 16th of the

month reporting on the status of proceedings below until the abatement is lifted. Either party may

request that the abatement be lifted when the trial court has entered a judgment disposing of all

issues.

 

G. Alan Waldrop, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Pemberton and Waldrop

Abated

Filed: September 22, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kirshner Entertainment & Technologies,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Harvey Judkowitz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: March 31, 2005                      /S/ Harvey Judkowitz
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Harvey Judkowitz
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jerry HYATT, Appellant.

No. WD 49535.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aug. 8, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 3, 1995.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 21, 1995.

Robert G. Duncan, Kansas City, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Hyatt appeals from his conviction for assault in the first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced as a prior offender to a term of twenty-five years imprisonment. Hyatt presents three points on appeal, claiming that the trial court erred in: (1) overruling a motion for judgment of acquittal at the end of all evidence because there was insufficient evidence showing that Hyatt inflicted serious physical injury upon the victim, Charles David Walker, when he bit off part of the ear of the victim; (2) overruling a motion for judgment of acquittal at the end of all evidence because there was insufficient evidence showing that Hyatt acted knowingly; and (3) sustaining the state’s objection to cross-examination of the victim.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
#### Jay Dee HART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 48140.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Feb. 8, 1994.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SMART, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and FENNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the denial of a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Jardine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Silverstar Mining
      Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Silverstar Mining Corp.                                                                    

Dated: February 12, 2009

*/s/ John
Jardine*John JardineChief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Silverstar Mining Corp.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silverstar
Mining Corp. and will be retained by Silverstar Mining Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 973 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 973

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 16, 2009.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of December 16, 2009.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Opinion filed May 16 , 201 3



### In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 12

- 00364

- C R

__________

ENRIQUE ROBERTO VILLARREAL

A / K /

A HENRY VILLARREAL

A / K /

A HENRY ROBERT VILLARREAL

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 350 th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 8858

- D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Enrique Roberto Villarreal a / k / a Henry Villarreal a /

k

/ a Henry Robert

Villarreal has filed in this court a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal and

dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2, the motion is signed by both

appellant and his counsel.2 The motion is granted. App ellant’s notice of appeal is withdrawn, and the

appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

May 16 , 2013

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Willson, J.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgette Mathers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





EXCLUSIVE APPAREL, INC.





Dated: August 2, 2010








By: /s/ Georgette Mathers


Georgette Mathers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Exclusive Apparel, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

GEORGE F. ELY, JR., 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 173 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.