alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 960129019-6019-01, I.D. 062196C]


Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Area; Pacific 
Cod by Vessels Using Trawl Gear

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Closure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing the directed fishery for Pacific cod by 
vessels using trawl gear in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
management area (BSAI). This action is necessary to prevent exceeding 
the first seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut apportioned to 
the trawl Pacific cod fishery in the BSAI.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 12 noon, Alaska local time (A.l.t.), June 23, 1996, 
until 12 noon, A.l.t., October 25, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Furuness, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The groundfish fishery in the BSAI exclusive 
economic zone is managed by NMFS according to the Fishery Management 
Plan for the Groundfish Fishery of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 
Area (FMP) prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council 
under authority of the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management 
Act. Fishing by U.S. vessels is governed by regulations implementing 
the FMP at subpart H of 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
    The first seasonal bycatch allowance of Pacific halibut for the 
BSAI trawl Pacific cod fishery category, which is defined at 
Sec. 675.21(b)(1)(iii)(E), was established by the Final 1996 Harvest 
Specifications of Groundfish (61 FR 4311, February 5, 1996) as 1,585 
metric tons (mt). This fishery was previously closed on May 14, 1996, 
with the expectation that the first seasonal allocation had been taken 
(61 FR 24730, May 16, 1996). The fishery was subsequently opened on 
June 14, 1996, when NMFS determined that 89 mt of halibut mortality 
remained in the allocation (61 30544, June 17, 1996).
    The Director, Alaska Region, NMFS, has determined, in accordance 
with Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(iv), that the first seasonal bycatch allowance 
of Pacific halibut apportioned to the trawl Pacific cod fishery in the 
BSAI has been caught. Therefore, NMFS is prohibiting the directed 
fishery for Pacific cod by vessels using trawl gear in the BSAI.
    Maximim retainable bycatch amounts for applicable gear types may be 
found in the regulations at Sec. 679.20(e).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR 679.20 and is exempt from review 
under E.O. 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: June 21, 1996.
Donald J. Leedy,
Acting Director, Office of Fisheries Conservation and Management, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 96-16373 Filed 6-21-96; 4:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-M
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF CORIXA CORPORATION

I, Steven Gillis, Ph.D., certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Corixa Corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 8, 2004                      /s/ STEVEN GILLIS
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         STEVEN GILLIS, PH.D.
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 129 (Wednesday, July 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 34876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-31, 936]


Boise Cascade Corporation, Vancouver, WA; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of June 13, 1996, the petitioners, Paper manufacturers of 
Local Union 293, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, 
requested administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's 
Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance under the trade act of 1974. The 
denial notice was signed on April 19, 1996, and published in the 
Federal Register on May 16, 1996 (61 FR 24814).
    The petitioner presents evidence that the Department's analysis of 
U.S. imports of pulp, and all paper products produced at the subject 
firm, was incomplete.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 17th day of June 1996.
Russell T. Kile,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-16912 Filed 7-2-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2009, and for the period then ended.

|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT                   
|Glade M. KnightChief Executive Officer
|
|                                      
|May 4, 2009                           
|                                      
|/s/ BRYAN PEERY                       
|Bryan PeeryChief Financial Officer    
|
|                                      
|May 4, 2009                           

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEDRICK McKALPAIN,

Petitioner,

v.

NICK LUDWICK,

Respondent.

____________________________/

Case No. 2:08-CV-15304

Honorable Arthur J. Tarnow

Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Komives’ Report and Recommendation [Docket

#12] filed August 10, 2010. The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny petitioner’s

application for the writ of habeas corpus and certificate of appealability. No objections were

filed. 

Having reviewed the file and the Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the

Report and Recommendation as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly,

petitioner’s application for the writ of habeas corpus and certificate of appealability are

DENIED.

 s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

Arthur J. Tarnow

Senior United States District Judge

Dated: October 13, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon parties/counsel of record on

October 13, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Catherine A. Pickles 

Judicial Secretary
hme10k2008ex10-49.htm


    Exhibit
10.49

    


    Home
Properties, L.P.

    Amendment
No. One Hundred to

    Second
Amended and Restated

    Agreement
of Limited Partnership

    


    


    


    The
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Home Properties,
L.P. (the “Partnership Agreement”) is hereby amended effective February 20, 2009
to substitute the “Schedule A” attached hereto for the “Schedule A” currently
attached to the Partnership Agreement.  “Schedule A” is hereby amended
to reflect various changes.

    


    GENERAL
PARTNER

    Home
Properties, Inc.

    


    


    /s/ Ann M.
McCormick

    Ann M.
McCormick

    Secretary

    


    


    LIMITED
PARTNERS LISTED ON ATTACHED SCHEDULE A

    By: Home
Properties, Inc.

    as attorney-in-fact

    


    


    /s/ Ann M.
McCormick

    Ann M.
McCormick

    Secretary
KENDRA PRIESTER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3633

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. James H. Daniel , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pa mela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 127 (Monday, July 1, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Revision of National Senior Service Corps' Grant Application

AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.

ACTION: Notice of 60-Day Review and Comment Period on National Senior 
Service Corps (NSSC) Project Grant Application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Senior Service Corps announces a 60-day review 
and comment period during which project sponsors and the public are 
encouraged to submit comments on suggested revisions to the NSSC 
Project Grant Application (424-NSSC). The Project Grant Application is 
submitted by prospective grantees to apply for or renew sponsorship of 
projects under the Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP), Foster 
Grandparent Program (FGP), and Senior Companion Program (SCP), 
collectively known as the National Senior Service Corps. Completion of 
the application is required to obtain or retain sponsorship.

DATES: The National Senior Service Corps will consider written comments 
on the Project Grant Application received on or before August 30, 1996. 
Comments are particularly invited which--
    (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed collection of information including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submissions of responses.
    (5) Assess how well the existing Grant Application collects 
appropriate information to allow agency decision-makers to fully assess 
applicant capabilities and plans for quality sponsorship and ability to 
program for community impacts.

ADDRESS TO SEND COMMENTS: Janice Forney Fisher, National Senior Service 
Corps (NSSC), Corporation for National Service, 1201 New York Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20525.

ESTABLISHED ANNUAL REPORTING OR DISCLOSURE BURDEN: 19,398 hours (1,220 
annual respondents at an average 15.9 hours burden per respondent).
    This document will be made available in alternate format upon 
request. TDD (202 606-5000 ext. 164.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: Janice Forney Fisher (202) 606-
5000 ext. 275.

    Regulatory Authority: National Service Trust Act of 1993.

    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Thomas E. Endres,
Deputy Director, National Senior Service Corps.
[FR Doc. 96-16637 Filed 6-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-M
1

As noted by the magistrate judge, plaintiff filed a separate case against different

defendants arising out of the same incident. That case is currently pending and is

assigned to the undersigned. Bowen v. Caruso, 08-12877.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DAVID BOWEN,

Plaintiff, 

v.

RICHARD CADY and V. McCABE,

Defendants.

______________________________/ 

Case Number: 09-10414

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT

This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming violations of

the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff’s claim stemmed from him falling down 26 steps while

being moved to an upper floor cell and injuring his back. The matter was referred to a

magistrate judge for all pre-trial proceedings.1 Defendants filed a motion for summary

judgment on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and

failed to establish personal involvement by defendants. The magistrate judge issued a

report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that the motion be granted. Plaintiff

did not object to the MJRR. Accordingly, the Court adopted the MJRR, granted

defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the case. See Order filed

January 13, 2010. 
2

Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, filed

January 29, 2010, in which he appears to say that he did not name the proper

defendants. Because this case is closed, the motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Moreover,

to the extent plaintiff asks for reconsideration of the dismissal, his paper fails to

convince the Court that it erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.

SO ORDERED.

 s/ Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 9, 2010

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed David L. Bowen, 2123

Mill Road, Flint, MI 48532 and to the attorneys of record on this date, February 9, 2010,

by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/ Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
Exhibit 32.02    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of POWRtec International Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Len Wood, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Len Wood By: Len Wood Chief Financial Officer  Dated: November 15, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-107102 on Form S-8 of our report relating to the consolidated financial statements (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the differences between InternationalFinancial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) of Mittal Steel Company N.V. dated April 16, 2007, and our report relating to management’s report onthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Mittal Steel Company N.V. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Deloitte Accountants B.V. 

Rotterdam, The Netherlands 

June 29, 2007
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Peggy A. Farley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Bioheart, Inc. (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrantand have:

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

May 14, 2010

/s/ Peggy A.Farley                

Name: Peggy A. Farley