alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy Resources
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, David M. McClanahan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David M. McClanahan
-----------------------------------------
David M. McClanahan
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2****DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP.****OFFICERS’ CERTIFICATE**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Dana W. Kammersgard, the Chief Executive Officer of Dot Hill SystemsCorp. (the “Company”), and Hanif I. Jamal, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     1. The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December31, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Periodic Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act;and     2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by thePeriodic Report.**In Witness whereof,**the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 13th day ofNovember, 2006.       /s/ Dana W. Kammersgard Dana W. Kammersgard   **/s/**Hanif I. Jamal Hanif I. Jamal  *Chief Executive Officer*   *Chief Financial Officer*       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “SEC”) or its staff upon request.     This certification “accompanies” the Periodic Report, is not deemed filed with the SEC and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the PeriodicReport), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William E.
Hitselberger, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of  PMA
Capital Corporation, do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the information contained in the Annual Report of  PMA Capital Corporation on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed  with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
PMA Capital  Corporation. A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

| |  |                                                                                   
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  |                                                                                   
| |  | /s/ William E. Hitselberger                                                       
| |  | William E. HitselbergerSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
| |  |                                                                                   
| |  | March 12, 2004                                                                    

---
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ David
      BergerDavid
      BergerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerFebruary 11,
2009
## In the

Co urt of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 0039 7

- CR

D ERRICK R ESHORD W ALTON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 431st District

Court

of Denton County (F17

- 295 9

- 431)

December 6, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMEN T

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 209 -CR

Todd Ant hony Le e , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF B ELL COUNTY , 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 6182 0 , HO NORAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Todd Anthony

L ee ple aded guilty

to th e o ff

en se of se x ual assault. See T e x. P e n a l C o d e A n n . § 2 2
. 0 1 1 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( W e s t S u p p . 2 0 0 8 )
. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u rt s e nte nc e d L e e to te n y e a rs ’ i mpr iso nme nt.

App e ll a n t’ s c o u rt- a

p p o in te d a tt o r

n e y h a s f il e d a mo ti o n to w it

h d r a w a n d a

brief concluding that the appe al is fr i v o l o u s an d without merit. The brief meets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif

or nia , 3 8 6 U. S
. 7 3 8 (1967), by prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord demonstrating why

there are no arg uable g rounds to be advanc ed. Se e als o P e ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 75 (1 98 8) ; Hi

gh v . S tat e , 5 73 S.W. 2d

80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur rie v . S tat e , 516 S.W .2d 684 ( T e x. C r i m . A p p . 1 97 4) ; Jac k so n v . S tat e , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Gainous
v . S tat e , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 9 ). Appellant rece ived a c opy of counse l’s brief2

a nd wa s a dv ise d o f h is r ig ht t o e xami ne the a pp e lla te re c ord a

nd to f ile a pr o s e br ie f. No pr o s e brief ha s been f

iled. We have r eviewe d the re co r d a n d counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the r ecor d that might arg uably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Aug ust 22, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15716]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets the schedule for the forthcoming meeting of 
the Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 92-463).

MEETING DATE, TIME, and
ADDRESS: Monday, July 22, 1996; 2 to 4 p.m., Innerwest Priority Board 
conference room, 1024 West Third Street, Dayton, Ohio 45407.

AGENDA: This business meeting will be open to the public. Space and 
facilities to accommodate members of the public are limited and persons 
accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The Chairman will 
permit attendees to address the Commission, but may restrict the length 
of presentations. An agenda will be available from the Superintendent, 
Dayton Aviation, 1 week prior to the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Gibson, Superintendent, Dayton 
Aviation, National Park Service, P.O. Box 9280, Wright Brothers 
Station, Dayton, Ohio 45409, or telephone 513-225-7705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission was 
established by Public Law 102-419, October 16, 1992.

    Dated: June 5, 1996.
William W. Schenk,
Field Director, Midwest Field Area.
[FR Doc. 96-15716 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the amended Annual Report of CenterPoint Energy
Resources Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, David M. McClanahan, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: January 10, 2006                   /s/ David M. McClanahan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David M. McClanahan
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of EuroTrust A/S (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the period ending  December 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Bo  Kristensen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company,

        A signed  original of this written  statement  has been  provided to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request,



Dated: June 23, 2006                       /s/ Bo Kristensen
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Bo Kristensen
                                               Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 10.33


                       SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
                                 Jean Stephenne
                    Senior Vice President and General Manager


                                December 23, 1997




Dr. Steven Gillis
President, Chief Executive Officer
Corixa Corporation
1124 Columbia Street
Suite 200
Seattle, WA  98104

        OPTION AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 1, 1997

Dear Steve:

        This is to inform you of SB's intention to extend the [xxx] Option
Period for one additional eighteen month period pursuant to Section 3(c) of the
Option Agreement dated March 1, 1997.

        The Option Extension Fee of $2,000,000 defined in Section 3(d) of said
Option Agreement will be transferred to you by wire transfer.

Yours Sincerely,


/s/ Jean Stephenne
-----------------------
Jean Stephenne
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 5, 2013

NO. 03-13-00693-CV

The City of Austin, Appellant

v.

David Goodman, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in the 

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that 

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said 

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2072
DONNA L. BOULWARE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHNIE WILSON, Commanding General, Department of the Army, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-96-1669-A) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donna L. Boulware, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Mercer Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment, denial of her motion for reconsideration, and dismissal of Appellant's case filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boulware v. Wilson , No. CA-96-1669-A (E.D. Va. June 18, 1997; July 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Cite as State v. Jackson, 122 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2009-Ohio-4087.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. JACKSON, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as State v. Jackson, 122 Ohio St.3d 1235, 2009-Ohio-4087.] 

Cause remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings to apply State v. 

Pasqualone. 

(No. 2009-0099 — Submitted June 16, 2009 — Decided August 20, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 2007-A-0079, 

2008-Ohio-6976. 

ON MOTION TO REVERSE AND REMAND. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} We accepted this discretionary appeal on April 22, 2009. 121 

Ohio St.3d 1449, 2009-Ohio-1820, 904 N.E.2d 900. On May 20, 2009, appellant 

filed a motion to reverse the judgment of the court of appeals on the authority of 

State v. Pasqualone, 121 Ohio St.3d 186, 2009-Ohio-315, 903 N.E.2d 270, and 

remand the cause to the court of appeals. Appellee has also filed a motion for 

leave to file a delayed cross-appeal. 

{¶ 2} Appellant’s motion is granted in part. The cause is remanded to 

the court of appeals for further proceedings to apply State v. Pasqualone to the 

court of appeals’ holding on appellee’s (appellant below) third assignment of 

error. 

{¶ 3} Appellee’s motion for leave to file a delayed cross-appeal is 

denied. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Thomas L. Sartini, Ashtabula County Prosecuting Attorney, and Shelley 

M. Pratt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

 James R. Willis, for appellee. 

 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, Benjamin C. Mizer, Solicitor General, 

and Elisabeth A. Long and Kimberly A. Olson, Deputy Solicitors, for amicus 

curiae, Ohio Attorney General. 

______________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant toSEC Release No. 33-8238 are being “furnished” to the SEC rather than “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and are not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filingof the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dot Hill Systems Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/    DANA W. KAMMERSGARD         

Dana W. Kammersgard 

Chief Executive Officer 

Date: March 16, 2010 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dot Hill Systems Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/    HANIF I. JAMAL         

Hanif I. Jamal 

ChiefFinancial Officer 

Date: March 16, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of March 31, 2011, and for the period then ended.

|                                        | 
|--------------------------------------- | 
|/s/    GLADE
M. KNIGHT                  | 
|                                        | 
|Glade M. Knight
Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                        | 
|May 6, 2011                             | 
|                                        | 
|/s/    BRYAN
PEERY                      | 
|                                        | 
|Bryan Peery
Chief Financial Officer     | 
|                                        | 
|May 6, 2011                             | 

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ecoland
International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending February 29, 2008, I, David
Wallace, Chief Executive Officer of Ecoland International, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:





1.           Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 29, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ending February 29, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Ecoland International,
Inc.





Dated:
April 10, 2008.





/s/  David
      WallaceDavid
      Wallace, Chief Executive Officer ofEcoland
      International, Inc.
Motion Granted and Order filed May 1 0 , 20 1 2
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 1 2
- 0 0 291
- CV

____________ DENSO CORPORATION , Appellant

V. KENNETH E. HALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JANICE H. BERG, DECEASED , KATHI BERG WALES, THERESA BERG JR., STEPHEN LESTER BERG, PHYLLIS BERG PELHAM AND JONOTHAN DAVID BERG, EACH INDIVUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH D. BERG, DECEASED, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010
- 46922

&

_____________ NO. 14
- 1 2
- 00 294
- CV

_____________ DENSO CORPORATION , Appellant

V. HELEN MUBARAK
- ASSAD , Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011
- 066032 &

_____________ NO. 14
- 12
- 0035 1
- CV

_____________ DENSO CORPORATION , Appellant

V. MAHMOUND A. DWEIB , Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010
- 12590

&

_____________ NO. 14
- 12
- 00353
- CV

_____________ DENSO CORPORATION , Appellant

V. DANIEL MEDINA , INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATE OF SILVIA MORALES, DECEASED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 1 5 2nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010
- 46924



### O R D E R
These four accelerated appeals are all taken from orders denying special appearances filed by DENSO Corporation. See Tex Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 74.351. On April 1 9 , 2012, DENSO Corporation mo ved to consolidate. The motion is GRANTE D and we issue the following order:3

We order the appeal s pending under our appellate case numbers 14

- 1 2

- 00 291

- CV , 14

- 12

- 00294

- CV, 14

- 12

- 003 51

- CV, and 14

- 12

- 0035 3

- CV , CONSOLIDATED
. Appellant's brief is due 20 days from t he date of this order

.

P ER CURIAM