alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

D-6, HAFIZ ANJUM,

Defendant(s).

/

CASE NO. 08-20668

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO TERMINATE PROBATION

Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Terminate Probation. Defendant seeks

early termination of probation. On July 21, 2010 defendant was sentenced to 3 years of

probation and restitution of $100,000.00 which has been paid in its entirety. The

government has responded to the motion. The Court being fully advised in the premises,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART. The defendant shall be

terminated from probation on January 21, 2012.

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: October 4, 2011 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on

this date, October 4, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:08-cr-20668-AC-VMM Doc # 145 Filed 10/04/11 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 933
Exhibit 10.3

 

POLICY REGARDING THE RECOUPMENT OF CERTAIN 
 PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION PAYMENTS

 

The Board of Directors or Compensation Committee shall, in such circumstances as it determines to be appropriate, require reimbursement of all or a portion of any performance-based short or long-term cash or equity incentive payments to an employee at the level of vice-president or above where: (1)  the amount of, or the number of shares included in, any such payment was calculated based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws; (2) the need for the accounting restatement was identified within 3 years after the date of the first public issuance or filing of the financial results that were subsequently restated; and (3) a lesser payment of cash or shares would have been made to the employee based upon the restated financial results.  This policy does not limit any other remedies the Company may have available to it in the circumstances, which may include, without limitation, dismissing the employee or initiating other disciplinary procedures.  The provisions of this policy are in addition to (and not in lieu of) any rights to repayment the Company may have under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other applicable laws.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3039-3040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1648]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

First Bankshares of Las Animas, Inc.; Notice of Proposal to 
Engage de novo in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The company listed in this notice has given notice under Sec.  
225.23(a)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23(a)(1)) for the 
Board's approval under section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act 
(12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) and Sec.  225.21(a) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 
225.21(a)) to commence or to engage de novo, either directly or through 
a subsidiary, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in Sec.  225.25 
of Regulation Y as closely related to banking and permissible for bank 
holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, such activities will be 
conducted throughout the United States.
    The notice is available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for 
processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices of 
the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing on the question whether commencement of the activity can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue 

[[Page 3040]]
concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts 
of interests, or unsound banking practices.'' Any request for a hearing 
on this question must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a 
written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, 
identifying specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Comments regarding the application must be received at the Reserve 
Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than 
February 13, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. First Bankshares of Las Animan, Inc., Las Animan, Colorado; to 
engage de novo through its subsidiary, Sunshine Village Apartments of 
Las Animas, LTD, Las Animas, Colorado, in the construction of 24-unit 
senior and multi-family housing project, and thereby engage in 
community deveopment activities, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(6) of the 
Board's Regulation Y. The geographic scope for these activities is Las 
Animas, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 24, 
1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-1648 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 3718

To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31, 1994, to certain

water resistant wool trousers that were entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse for consumption, after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1995.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 1996

Mr. MEEHAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To apply the rates of duty effective after December 31,

1994, to certain water resistant wool trousers that were

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption,

after December 31, 1988, and before January 1, 1995.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of

4 1930 or any other provision of law, upon proper request

5 filed with the Customs Service within 180 days after the

6 date of the enactment of this Act, any entry or withdrawal

7 from warehouse for consumption—
2

•HR 3718 IH

1 (1) that was made after December 31, 1988,

2 and before January 1, 1995, and

3 (2) that, if it had been made on January 1,

4 1995—

5 (A) would have been claimed under sub6 heading 6203.41.05 or 6204.61.10 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States,

8 and

9 (B) would have had a lower duty,

10 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such entry or with11 drawal had been made on January 1, 1995.

Æ
**Exhibit
      23.2**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-76006 and 333-76008) of our report dated April 9, 2007,
      including an emphasis of a matter paragraph for the Company’s adoption of
      Statement of Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), relating to our audit
      of the consolidated financial statements of CTI Industries Corporation and
      Subsidiaries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006 and
      2005.




/s/
                Weiser LLPNew
                York, New YorkApril
                15, 2008
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

BRUNO CHOINIERE,

Plaintiff,

v.

S. CITCHEN, ROBIN WILSON, MOODY,

IRIS D. GUIDRY, ARTURO AVILES,

C. EICHENLAUB, DIRECTOR OF

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

TIFFANY WILSON, V. TOKARZ,

Defendants.

/

Case Number 08-14853

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S “MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF COURT OFFICIAL NOTICE TO

DEFENDANTS . . .”

This matter is before the Court on a report and recommendation [Dkt # 32] issued by

Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen on July 2, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends that the

Court deny Plaintiff’s “motion for issuance of court official notice to Defendants . . .” [Dkt. # 8]

because there is no legal basis for the relief that Plaintiff seeks. As of today’s date, no party has

filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The failure to file

objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit

Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object

to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court, however, agrees with the report and

recommendation of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

1:08-cv-14853-TLL-RSW Doc # 33 Filed 07/31/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 529
-2-

# 32] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “motion for issuance of court official notice to

Defendants . . .” [Dkt. # 8] is DENIED.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 31, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 31, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cv-14853-TLL-RSW Doc # 33 Filed 07/31/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 530
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3651 Introduced in House (IH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3651

      To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to limit 
          expenditures in House of Representatives elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 1996

 Mr. Pomeroy introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to limit 
          expenditures in House of Representatives elections.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXPENDITURES IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
              ELECTIONS.

    Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441a) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i) A candidate for the office of Representative in, or Delegate 
or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress may not make expenditures 
with respect to an election for such office, which, in the aggregate, 
exceed $300,000.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 1 shall apply with respect to 
elections occurring after 1996.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.23


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is dated November      , 2008 and
effective immediately amends the
Employment Agreement with an effective date of November 10, 2005
(hereinafter the “Original Agreement”) by and between Peter R. Ingram
(hereinafter the “Employee”) and Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., a Hawaii
corporation (hereinafter the “Company”).


 


For due consideration, the receipt and adequacy of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree and acknowledge that:


 


Paragraph
8., PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION WITHOUT CAUSE IN EXCHANGE FOR AGREEMENT TO
WAIVE ALL CLAIMS, of the Original Agreement shall be amended in relevant
part to read as follows (the new, added language is underscored for identification
and emphasis):


 


a.             If Company terminates Employee’s at
will employment without Cause, in addition to  Accrued Obligations, Employee shall be
entitled to the following payments in exchange for a valid release and waiver
of all claims thorough the Termination Date that Employee may have at that time
against Company or related persons or entities (“Waiver of All Claims”):
Company shall pay to Employee an amount equal to Employee’s Base Salary and
medical/dental premiums for one year plus the prorated value of any Performance
Bonus to which Employee would have  been
entitled in the current year (“the Settlement Sum”). The Settlement Sum
shall be paid in a lump sum, less applicable withholdings, on the Termination
Date. Company shall provide all information for continuation of fringe benefits
to the extent required by law.


 


All
other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force
and  effect.


 


IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
this First Amendment to Employment Agreement to be executed as of the date
written above.


 


	
  COMPANY

  	
  EMPLOYEE

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Mark B.Dunkerley

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  /s/ Peter R. Ingram

  
	
   

  	
  Mark B.Dunkerley

  	
   

  	
  Peter R. Ingram

  
	
   

  	
  President &
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Hawaiian
  Airlines, Inc.
**Exhibit 32.1**

The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 are being “furnished” to the SECrather than “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and are not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to theliabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officerof Dot Hill Systems Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

/s/    DANA W. KAMMERSGARD        

Dana W. Kammersgard 

ChiefExecutive Officer 

Date: March 9, 2009 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Dot Hill Systems Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/    HANIF I.JAMAL         

Hanif I. Jamal 

Chief Financial Officer 

Date: March 9, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15847]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than July 5, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. Jennifer L. and Randall L. Trimble, Burlington, Kansas, and Lisa 
A. Dreiling, Mission, Kansas; each to acquire an additional 16.7 
percent, for a total of 50.0 percent of the voting shares of Rock Creek 
Bancshares, Inc., Burlington, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Peoples National Bank and Trust Co., Burlington, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 17, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-15847 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12



                           ILINC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



       The following table sets forth the Company's earnings to fixed charges
for the periods indicated:

<TABLE>
<S>     <C>

                                                                             YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                  -------------------------------------------
                                                                      2006            2005           2004
                                                                  -------------  ---------------  -----------
                  Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (a)              (a)             (a)            (a)

</TABLE>


(a)        Due to the loss recorded in 2006, 2005, and 2004, the ratio coverage
           was less than 1:1. The Company would have needed to generate
           additional earnings of $1.3 million, $5.2 million, and $2.3 million
           to achieve a ratio coverage of 1:1 in 2006, 2005, and 2004.

           For the purposes of computing the consolidated ratio of earnings to
           fixed charges, earnings consist of income before income taxes and
           extraordinary items. Fixed charges consist of interest on all
           indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, and that
           portion of rental expense that the Company believes to be
           representative of interest.
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATIONS



I, William Tay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Greater China Acquisition Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 19, 2007



/s/ William Tay

William Tay, President and CEO

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KIMBERLY O’ROURKE,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 09-10542

v.

Hon. John Corbett O’Meara

VAN RU CREDIT CORP.,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

On February 13, 2009, Plaintiff filed a complaint in this action alleging violations of the

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the Michigan Debt Collection Practices Act, and the

Michigan Occupational Code. Plaintiff does not allege that diversity jurisdiction exists. 

Although Plaintiff’s federal cause of action is cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1331, the remaining allegations present claims based on state law. This court declines to

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims so as to avoid jury confusion. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of

Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Counts II and III of Plaintiff’s complaint

are DISMISSED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara

United States District Judge

Date: February 27, 2009

5:09-cv-10542-JCO-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 02/27/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 10
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on

this date, February 27, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager

5:09-cv-10542-JCO-MKM Doc # 4 Filed 02/27/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 11