alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL C. RINCKEY,

Petitioner, Case No. 2:09-CV-10182

v. 

HON. AVERN COHN

NICK J. LUDWICK, Warden,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELEASE ON BOND (Doc. 8)

I.

Petitioner Michael C. Rinckey has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Now before the Court is Petitioner's "Motion for Release on

Bond." For the reasons that follow, the motion will be denied.

II.

To receive bond pending a decision on the merits of a habeas corpus petition, a

petitioner must show a substantial claim of law based on the facts surrounding the

petition and the existence of "some circumstance making the [motion for bond]

exceptional and deserving of special treatment in the interests of justice." Dotson v.

Clark, 900 F.2d 77, 79 (6th Cir. 1990). "There will be few occasions where a prisoner

will meet this standard." Dotson, 900 F.2d at 79. Where the court finds no substantial

claim that the petitioner is confined in violation of the Constitution, it need not reach the

issue of whether exceptional circumstances exist which deserve special treatment in the

interest of justice. Id. Because a habeas petitioner "is appealing a presumptively valid

state conviction . . . it will indeed be the very unusual case where a habeas petitioner is

2:09-cv-10182-AC-DAS Doc # 11 Filed 02/01/11 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 616
2

admitted to bail prior to a decision on the merits in the habeas case." Lee v. Jabe, 989

F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir. 1993). Petitioner's motion fails to establish the existence of any

extraordinary and exceptional circumstances which merit release on bond. Accordingly,

the motion for bond is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

 S/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: February 1, 2011

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record on this date, February 1, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Julie Owens 

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:09-cv-10182-AC-DAS Doc # 11 Filed 02/01/11 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 617
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB/A
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                            ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
                              EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                   For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 1997
                             Commission File Number
                                    000-23115

                           CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


            Delaware                                   36-2848943
  (State or other jurisdiction of        (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
  incorporation or organization)


          22160 North Pepper Road
           Barrington, Illinois                            60010
   (Address of principal executive offices)              (Zip Code)


                                 (847) 382-1000
               Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Sections 12(b) and 12(g) of the Act:


                                                   Name of each exchange
          Title of Class                            on which registered:
          --------------                            --------------------

    Common Stock, .065 par value                   NASDAQ SmallCap Market



                            To Include Exhibit 10.26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      116,731
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          22,129
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,498
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,358
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       22,538
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             15,888
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  41,426
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            41,597
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              17,300
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      414
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  52,621
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  153,358
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       94,593
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,147
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      87,790
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      89,937
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,656
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,093
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   5,749
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,953
<NET-INCOME>                                       796
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      796
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,184
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,556
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           8,693
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.63


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
        23.1**
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  Chordiant
        Software, Inc.
 Cupertino,
        California
  We
        hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
        on Form S-8 (No. 333-100843, No. 333-83506; No. 333-60156; 333-49032; No.
        333-42844; No. 333-34502; No. 333-110743, and No. 333-131057) of Chordiant
        Software, Inc. of our reports dated February 9, 2007, relating to the
        consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and to
        Chordiant Software, Inc’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing
        in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
  /s/
        BDO Seidman, LLP
  San
        Jose, California
 February
        9, 2007
The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern

1

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2292

___________

Willie Lee Kent, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri. 

Ken Korpecki, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 7, 1998

 Filed: July 27, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Willie Lee Kent, a Missouri prisoner, appeals from the district court&s grant of 1

summary judgment to Ken Korpecki in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action claiming that

Korpecki failed to protect him from being assaulted by two other inmates, and from its

order denying Kent&s motion for reconsideration.
-2-

After our de novo review, see Madewell v. Downs, 68 F.3d 1030, 1036 (8th Cir.

1995), we conclude that the district court&s grant of summary judgment for Korpecki

was appropriate, because the record does not evidence that Korpecki had sufficient

knowledge of the likelihood that Kent would be assaulted to render him liable for

damages under section 1983. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also conclude the district court

did not abuse its discretion in denying Kent&s motion for reconsideration. See Perkins

v. US W. Communications, 138 F.3d 336, 340 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review for

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion); Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169 & n.14

(8th Cir. 1988) (standard of review for Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion; Rule 60(b)

provides for extraordinary relief which may be granted only upon adequate showing of

exceptional circumstances). 

We deny Kent&s motion to enlarge the record on appeal and affirm the judgment.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of A.M., a Child

No. 06

- 18

- 00012

- CV Appeal from the 307th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2017

- 617

- DR ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Burge ss, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal.
Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RE NDERED JUNE 22, 2018 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 2, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34406-34407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-135; RM-8825]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mena, AR

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by Wendell Harlan requesting the

[[Page 34407]]

allotment of Channel 287C3 to Mena, Arkansas, as that community's third 
local FM transmission service. Coordinates used for Channel 287C3 at 
Mena, Arkansas, are 34-38-46 and 94-16-53.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before August 12, 1996, and reply 
comments on or before August 27, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner, as follows: Wendell Harlan, 3906 Hwy 375 
West, P.O. Box 1426, Mena, AR 71953.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-135, adopted June 14, 
1996, and released June 21, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-16765 Filed 7-1-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Exhibit I 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 643-10 Filed 06/19/19 Page 1 of 3
**** 50 Red R*O*S*E*S S*P*E*C*I*A*L - DONT MISS OUT!!!!! **** - tacoma escorts - backpage.com

http://tacoma.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/50-red-roses-special-dont-miss-out-38/5698064[6/17/2013 3:48:05 PM]

tacoma, wa free classifieds

backpage.com > tacoma adult entertainment > tacoma escorts

Account Login | Affiliate Program | Promote Us | Help | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | User Safety | backpage.com © Copyright 2013

Report Ad

Posted: Monday, June 10, 2013 10:26 AM

Reply: click here

****** I AM NOT A PRO ***** 

**** 5'7 - 125 lbs - *Upscale*Gorgeous* H*O*T *Blonde* 

***** *Midnight*Blue*Eyes* - *Stunning*Good*Looks* ******** 

**********Come Relax With Me..... 

***You'll feel like you are in Heaven and want to come back for more... 

***Find out for yourself what others fantasize about having. 

******* I offer Companionship ************ 

***** FREE 10 MIN SENSUAL THERAPY MASSAGE INCLUDED******** 

  I have a Private, Discrete location ** *** 

********100% Independent & Safe*********** 

***** Please call me for an appointment.You wont be disappointed ***** 

  253.581. - Ask for ** *** 

******** My donation is very reasonable ********* 

*******I AM AVAILABLE 24/7 FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE ******************** 

****** I AM WELL WORTH THE TIME TO COME SEE ME!! ******* 

** AS OF 06/17/13, I DESPERATELY NEED TO PAY MY RENT,PHONE,CABLE & ELECTRIC BILLS, WHICH ARE ALL NOW 2 MONTHS

PAST DUE. IF YOU CAN PLEASE HELP A LITTLE LADY OUT IT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. I AM ALSO WILLING TO DO

ANY WORK THAT YOU MAY HAVE AVAILABLE,PLEASE. THANK YOU.  

** ***CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW TO SEE ALL OF (MY) PICS************ 

More Pictures and Info: http://adultsearch.com/washington/tacoma/female-escorts/391

***This is not an offer for prostitution. All donations are for my time and companionship only *** 

Poster's age: 38

• Location: Tacoma

• Post ID: 5698064 tacoma

Email this ad

Enlarge Picture

**** 50 Red R*O*S*E*S S*P*E*C*I*A*L - DONT MISS OUT!!!!! **** - 38

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 643-10 Filed 06/19/19 Page 2 of 3
**** 50 Red R*O*S*E*S S*P*E*C*I*A*L - DONT MISS OUT!!!!! **** - tacoma escorts - backpage.com

http://tacoma.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/50-red-roses-special-dont-miss-out-38/5698064[6/17/2013 3:48:05 PM]

tacoma.backpage.com is an interactive computer service that enables access by multiple users and should not be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another

information content provider.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 643-10 Filed 06/19/19 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHN K. ZESTOS,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-10644

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

FIRST MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING,

Defendant.

______________________________________ /

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

On July 17, 2009, the Court dismissed Plaintiff John K. Zestos’s complaint sua sponte for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [Dkt. # 14]. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed three pleadings, each

seeking reconsideration of that decision. [Dkt. # 19, 20, 22]. On July 31, 2009, the Court denied

the application for reconsideration, reasoning that Plaintiff had not demonstrated good cause for not

filing a proposed amended complaint in a timely fashion. [Dkt. # 21]. On July 30, 2009, Plaintiff

filed a “request” for reconsideration, which indicated that he has retained counsel. [Dkt. # 22]. The

request was denied on August 10, 2009. [Dkt. # 23]. 

Six months later, on February 17, 2010, Plaintiff filed a “motion for continuance.” [Dkt. #

24]. Notwithstanding the motion’s title, it appears to be yet another request for reconsideration of

the July 17 order dismissing the complaint. This case has been closed for more than six months, and

several motions for reconsideration have already been denied. See Fleck v. Titan Tire Corp., 177

F. Supp. 2d 605, 624 (E.D. Mich. 2001) (“[T]he court will not grant motions for rehearing or

reconsideration that merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by

reasonable implication.). Those decisions will not be revisited. 
-2-

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for continuance [Dkt. # 24] is

DENIED. 

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: March 1, 2010

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on March 1, 2010.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33129-33130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16324]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of Extramural Research; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice

[[Page 33130]]

is hereby given of a meeting of the Peer Review Oversight Group (PROG) 
to be held July 18 and 19, 1996 in Conference Room 6, C-Wing, 6th 
Floor, Building 31, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 20892. The 
meeting will be held from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on July 18 and from 
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on July 19. The meeting is open to the public, 
with attendance limited to space available.
    The agenda for this initial meeting of the Committee will include 
an update on NIH extramural reinvention activities and a discussion of 
the NIH peer review system.
    Peggy McCardle, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, PROG, and Special 
Assistant to the Deputy Director for Extramural Research, OD, NIH, 
Building 1, Room 150, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 402-2246, will 
furnish the meeting agenda and roster of committee members upon 
request. Individuals who plan to attend the meeting and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other special 
accommodations, should contact Dr. McCardle by July 11, 1996.

    Dated: June 21, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-16324 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

RAYMOND B. RIPPY,

Defendant.

Case No. 09-10654

DISTRICT JUDGE

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

MONA K. MAJZOUB

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

RECOMMENDATION [27] AND DISMISSING REQUEST FOR HEARING

ABOUT THE GARNISHMENT AND CLAIM FOR EXEMPTIONS [18]

On September 14, 2009, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued a Report and

Recommendation [27] that the Request for Hearing About The Garnishment and

Claim for Exemptions be dismissed. No objections were filed.

The Court has reviewed the record in this case. 

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby

ADOPTED and is entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Request for Hearing About the Garnishment and

Claim for Exemptions [18] is DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED.

S/ARTHUR J. TARNOW 

Arthur J. Tarnow

United States District Judge

2:09-cv-10654-AJT-MKM Doc # 28 Filed 10/07/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 84
Dated: October 7, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of

record on October 7, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

S/THERESA E. TAYLOR 

Case Manager

2:09-cv-10654-AJT-MKM Doc # 28 Filed 10/07/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 85
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Andrew Hayward Jackson, Jr. v. Fort Bend County, Fort Bend 

County Drainage District, Fort Bend County Emergency 

Service District No. 7, Fort Bend County Fresh Water Supply 

District No. 01, Fort Bend County General Fund, and Fort 

Bend County Independent School District

Appellate case number: 01-22-00880-CV

Trial court case number: 21-DCV-282688

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Andrew Hayward Jackson, Jr., filed a notice of appeal from the trial 

court’s October 25, 2022 final judgment. On December 19, 2022, appellant filed a “Motion 

for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis,” requesting that he be permitted to proceed on

appeal without payment of costs. Appellant’s motion does not state whether he was 

permitted to proceed without payment of costs in the trial court; nor does appellant’s 

motion reflect that he filed an affidavit of indigence or Statement of Inability to Pay Costs

in the trial court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b). 

Appellant’s motion filed with this Court similarly does not include a Statement of 

Inability to Pay Costs, or any other evidence of indigency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(c). 

Absent evidence that appellant was permitted to proceed without payment of costs in the 

trial court, or a completed Statement of Inability to Pay Costs, we are unable to determine 

whether appellant should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Accordingly, appellant’s “Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” is 

denied. However, this order does not prevent appellant from re-filing his request to 

proceed without payment of costs along with (1) evidence that he was permitted to proceed 

without payment of costs in the trial court, or (2) a completed Statement of Inability to Pay 

Costs, establishing his indigency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b), (c).
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ April Farris________

  Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___January 5, 2023_____
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1119

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide taxpayer 
               notification of suspected identity theft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2009

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide taxpayer 
               notification of suspected identity theft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION OF SUSPECTED IDENTITY THEFT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 77 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to miscellaneous provisions) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new section:

``SEC. 7529. NOTIFICATION OF SUSPECTED IDENTITY THEFT.

    ``If, in the course of an investigation under section 7206 
(relating to fraud and false statements) or 7207 (relating to 
fraudulent returns, statements, or other documents), the Secretary 
determines that there was or may have been an unauthorized use of the 
identity of the taxpayer or dependents, the Secretary shall--
            ``(1) as soon as practicable and without jeopardizing such 
        investigation, notify the taxpayer of such determination, and
            ``(2) if any person is criminally charged by indictment or 
        information under either of such sections, notify such taxpayer 
        as soon as practicable of such charge.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 77 of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``Sec. 7529. Notification of suspected identity theft.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to determinations made after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```