alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 09-20006-08-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

TRAVIS WILDFONG,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT TWO, AND TAKING THE RULE

11 PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on September 17, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on

September 18, 2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s guilty plea. As of today’s

date, no party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The

failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith

v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure

to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review

the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The Court, however, agrees with the findings

and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 98] is ADOPTED.

1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB Doc # 139 Filed 11/04/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 409
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s guilty plea as to count two is ACCEPTED, and

the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 97] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 4, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 4, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:09-cr-20006-TLL-CEB Doc # 139 Filed 11/04/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 410
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.1 Page 1 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.2 Page 2 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.3 Page 3 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.4 Page 4 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.5 Page 5 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.6 Page 6 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.7 Page 7 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.8 Page 8 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.9 Page 9 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.10 Page 10 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.11 Page 11 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.12 Page 12 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.13 Page 13 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.14 Page 14 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.15 Page 15 of 16
Case 5:09-cv-10384-JCO-MJH ECF No. 1 filed 02/02/09 PageID.16 Page 16 of 16
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

R.Q. WARD, J. R. MCFARLANE, G.G. GERDING

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CORTEZ COUNCIL

PRIVATE (E

- 1), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201300368

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 14 June 2013.

**Military Judge:** LtCol Leon Francis, USMC.

**Convening Authority:** Commanding Officer, 3d Assault

Amphibian Battalion, 1st Marine Division (REIN), Camp

Pendleton, CA

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommend ation:**  Maj D.P. Harvey,

USMC

. **For Appellant:** CAPT Bree Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

**30 January 2014**

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**-------------------------------------------- -------** 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Cou rt

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1112 

To make effective the proposed rule of the Food and Drug Administration 

relating to sunscreen drug products, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To make effective the proposed rule of the Food and Drug 

Administration relating to sunscreen drug products, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sunscreen Labeling 

5 Protection Act of 2009’’ or the ‘‘SUN Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1112 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE FOR RULE RELATING TO SUN2 SCREEN DRUG PRODUCTS FOR OVER-THE3 COUNTER HUMAN USE. 

4 Notwithstanding subchapter II of chapter 5, and 

5 chapter 7, of title 5, United States Code (commonly known 

6 as the ‘‘Administrative Procedure Act’’) and any other 

7 provision of law, the proposed rule issued by the Commis8 sioner of Food and Drugs entitled ‘‘Sunscreen Drug Prod9 ucts for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amend10 ment of Final Monograph’’, 72 Fed. Reg. 49070 (August 

11 27, 2007), shall take effect on the date that is 180 days 

12 after the date of enactment of this Act, unless such Com13 missioner issues the final rule, which includes formulation, 

14 labeling, and testing requirements for both ultraviolet B 

15 (UVB) and ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation protection, be16 fore such effective date. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 02, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 02, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0399. REDMOND PARK HOSPITAL, LLC d/b/a REDMOND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. GA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2019CV329414
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Actavision Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  April 17, 2009                  /s/ Ching-Sang Hong ------------------------------- Ching-Sang Hong, CEO & CFO
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WebSafety, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rowland W. Day II, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By:  */s/ Rowland W. Day II*

Rowland W. Day II

Principal Executive Officer

 

Dated:  August 14, 2012

This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to WebSafety, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

Based on the stipulation of the Estate of James Larkin and the United States, and good 

cause appearing, it is ordered that:

1. The United States acknowledges that it is not seeking forfeiture in Case No. 18-cr00422 of the assets listed on pages 2-3 of the Estate’s motion at docket number 

1856.

2. The United States shall work in good faith with the Estate to ensure that documents 

previously recorded on real property in connection with Mr. Larkin’s release 

pending trial can no longer cloud title.

3. The Estate’s request for the release of assets seized from the Republic Bank of 

Arizona account number XXXX2500 is withdrawn.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1942-1 Filed 11/07/23 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Beyond Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Geordan Pursglove, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

(1)Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

 

(2)The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

November 16, 2020
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KARP & WEISS, P.C.

3060 North Swan Road

Tucson, Arizona 85712-1225

Telephone (520) 325-4200

Facsimile (520) 325-4224

Stephen M. Weiss

PCC No. 61412

State Bar No. 002261

sweiss@karpweiss.com

Attorney for Defendant Joye Vaught

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

 v.

7. JOYE VAUGHT

Defendant

 

 CR-18-00422-07-PHX-SPL

DEFENDANT VAUGHT’S JOINDER

IN DEFENDANTS LACEY’S AND

LARKIN’S OPPOSITION (DOC 408)

TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR

ACCESS TO THE JOINT

REPRESENTATION AND JOINT

DEFENSE AGREEMENTS (DOC 354)

The Defendant Joye Vaught, by and through her attorney Stephen M. Weiss, 

hereby joins in Defendants Lacey’s and Larkin’s Opposition (Doc 408) to 

Government’s Motion for Access to the Joint Representation and Joint Defense 

Agreements (Doc 354) and adopts the positions set forth in the Opposition as if fully set 

forth herein.

DATED this 13th day of December, 2018.

KARP & WEISS, P.C.

By /s/ Stephen M. Weiss 

Stephen M. Weiss

Attorney for Defendant Vaught

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 421 Filed 12/13/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 13th day of December, 2018, I electronically 

transmitted the foregoing Joinder in Defendants Lacey’s and Larkin’s Opposition (Doc 

408) to Government’s Motion for Access to the Joint Representation and Joint Defense 

Agreements (Doc 354) on behalf of Joye Vaught to the Clerk of the Court by filing with 

the CM/ECF system and understand a copy of the filing will be emailed to the following 

CM/ECF registrants:

Honorable Steven P. Logan: logan_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov

Kevin M. Rapp: kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

John J. Kucera: john.kucera@usdoj.gov

Reginald E. Jones: reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

Peter Kozinets: peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

Patrick Reid: patrick.reid@usdoj.gov 

Andrew Stone: andrew.stone@usdoj.gov

Amanda Wick: amanda.wick@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Government

Bruce S. Feder: bf@federlawpa.com

James C. Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

K. C. Maxwell: kmaxwell@bgrfirm.com

Michael D. Kimerer: MDK@kimerer.com

Michael L. Piccarreta: mlp@pd-law.com

Paul J. Cambria, Jr.: pcambria@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Daniel James Quigley: quigley@djqplc.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 421 Filed 12/13/18 Page 2 of 2
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 49 Att. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DONNA L. MEANOR, AS EXECUTOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAGNER, 

SR., DECEASED; FAIRMAN DRILLING 

COMPANY; ALAN R. FAIRMAN; SANDRA 

R. FAIRMAN; RONALD R. FAIRMAN; 

BEVERLY A. FAIRMAN; RICHARD M. 

FAIRMAN; GARY D. FAIRMAN; FRANK 

G. FAIRMAN; TERRY L. FAIRMAN; 

WILLIAM WOOD AND BETTY WOOD, 

HIS WIFE; DOLORES M. WAGNER; 

DOLORES J. WAGNER; COUNTY-WIDE 

REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.; B. 

LEONARD BRODY; PATRICK F. 

MCCARTHY; E. JAMES TRIMARCHI; 

DAVID R. TOMB; WAGNER AND 

WAGNER; JAMES CARSON AND 

SUSAN CARSON, HIS WIFE

v.

PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, 

LLC, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO 

EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, A 

DIVISION OF THE FORMER EQUITABLE 

RESOURCES, INC.

PETITION OF: ROBERT A. WAGNER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 149 WAL 2019

Cross Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court

DONNA L. MEANOR, AS EXECUTOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF ROBERT WAGNER, 

SR., DECEASED; FAIRMAN DRILLING 

COMPANY; ALAN R. FAIRMAN; SANDRA 

R. FAIRMAN; RONALD R. FAIRMAN; 

BEVERLY A. FAIRMAN; RICHARD M. 

FAIRMAN; GARY D. FAIRMAN; FRANK 

G. FAIRMAN;TERRY L. FAIRMAN; 

WILLIAM WOOD AND BETTY WOOD, 

HIS WIFE; DOLORES M. WAGNER; 

DOLORES J. WAGNER; COUNTY-WIDE 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 150 WAL 2019

Cross Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal from the Order of the Superior 

Court
[149 WAL 2019 and 150 WAL 2019] - 2

REAL ESTATE COMPANY, INC.; B. 

LEONARD BRODY; PATRICK F. 

MCCARTHY; E. JAMES TRIMARCHI; 

DAVID R. TOMB; WAGNER AND 

WAGNER; JAMES CARSON AND 

SUSAN CARSON, HIS WIFE

v.

PEOPLES NATURAL GAS COMPANY, 

LLC, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO 

EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, LLC F/K/A 

EQUITABLE GAS COMPANY, A 

DIVISION OF THE FORMER EQUITABLE 

RESOURCES, INC.

PETITION OF: ROBERT A. WAGNER

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2019, the Cross Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Abatement Order filed November 30, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00524

- CV

____________ METROPOLITAN WATER COMPANY, LP , Appellant

V.

B LUE WATER SYSTEMS, LP AND BLUE WATER VISTA RIDGE, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from th e 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 37412



### ABATEMENT ORDER

Notice was filed on November 22, 2021
, that appellant is in ban kruptcy. Tex. R. App. P. 8.1. According to the notice, on November 22, 2021
, appellan t petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas , Austin Division
, under case number 2 1

- 10903 . A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcypetition is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in accordance with

federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.
When a case has been suspended by a bank ruptcy filing, a party may move the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by f ederal law or the bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).
For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdict ion, the appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PE R CURIAM
Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
Case 2:09-cv-10065-MOB-MKM Document 69 Filed 11/24/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10065-MOB-MKM Document 69 Filed 11/24/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-10065-MOB-MKM Document 69 Filed 11/24/10 Page 3 of 3
Fialka

Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 39 Att. 14

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH   Document 640   Filed 06/18/19   Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT ANNABEL,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-15329-BC

Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

 v.

DAVID R. GENDERNALIK, R. M. DAVIS,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION, OVERRULING IN PART AND SUSTAINING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

AND DENYING AS MOOT ANY PENDING MOTIONS

On September 15, 2008, pro se Plaintiff Robert Annabel filed a complaint alleging that

Defendants David R. Gendernalik and R. M. Davis violated his rights under the Religious Land Use

and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc, et seq.; and the First, Eighth,

and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at Macomb Correctional Facility

in New Haven, Michigan. The matter is before the Court on a report and recommendation [Dkt. #

12] issued by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder on April 9, 2009. The magistrate judge

recommends sua sponte dismissing the complaint, with prejudice, because Plaintiff acknowledged

on the face of his complaint that he did not meet the mandatory requirement of exhausting his

administrative remedies prior to filing suit, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act

(“PLRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.

On April 20, 2009, Plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation. First,

Plaintiff contends that his complaint does not demonstrate that he failed to exhaust administrative

1:08-cv-15329-TLL-CEB Doc # 16 Filed 07/13/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 64
-2-

remedies. Plaintiff contends that his complaint demonstrates that the grievance procedure was not

available to him because Defendants would not have tolerated use of the grievance process.

However, the generalized assertion that Defendants would not have tolerated use of the grievance

process does not justify a conclusion that grievance procedures were not available. Thus, Plaintiff’s

first objection will be overruled. Plaintiff’s second objection is that the complaint is not properly

dismissed with prejudice when the basis for the dismissal is that Plaintiff has not exhausted

administrative remedies. This objection will be sustained and Plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed

without prejudice.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 12] is ADOPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation [Dkt.

# 14] are OVERRULED IN PART and SUSTAINED IN PART.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint [Dkt. # 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that any pending motions [Dkt. # 3, 8, 11] are DENIED AS

MOOT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: July 13, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on July 13, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cv-15329-TLL-CEB Doc # 16 Filed 07/13/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 65
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
(the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/
James B. Wiegand


James B.
Wiegand


Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


April 13,
2009
Fialka-Feldman v. Oakland University Board of Trustees Doc. 45 Att. 12

Dockets.Justia.com