alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w28







Exhibit 10.28




FORM OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED KEY EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN



WHEREAS, the Second Amended and Restated Key Executive Severance Plan (the “Plan”), by its terms,
is intended to comply with, or otherwise be exempt from, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”) and any regulations and Treasury guidance promulgated
thereunder; and



WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Human Genome
Sciences, Inc. (the “Corporation”), upon advice of counsel, has determined that certain revisions
to the Plan are advisable to ensure compliance with Section 409A.



NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of January 1, 2009, as follows:





	1.	 	Section 3.5(vi) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:






“(vi) “Termination of employment,” “resignation,” or words of
similar import, as used in the Plan means, for purposes of any
payments under the Plan that are payments of deferred compensation
subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Participant’s “separation
from service” as defined in Section 409A of the Code.”




	2.	 	Section 3.5(vii) is amended in its entirety to read as follows:






“(vii) If a payment obligation under this Plan arises on account of
Participant’s separation from service while Participant is a
“specified employee” (as defined under Section 409A of the Code and
determined in good faith by the Compensation Committee), any payment
of “deferred compensation” (as defined under Treasury Regulation
Section 1.409A-1(b)(1), after giving effect to the exemptions in
Treasury Regulation Sections 1.409A-1(b)(3) through (b)(12)) that is
scheduled to be paid within six months after such separation from
service shall accrue at the Prime Rate of interest and shall be made
within 15 days after the end of the six-month period beginning on
the date of such separation from service or, if earlier, within 15
days after appointment of the personal representative or executor of
Participant’s estate following Participant’s death.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer this ___day of December, 2008.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	HUMAN GENOME SCIENCE, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Its:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

feder law office, p.a.

2930 e. camelback road, suite 160

phoenix, arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135

bf@federlawpa.com

fl@federlawpa.com

Bruce Feder - State Bar No. 004832

Attorney for Defendant, Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

Scott Spear. )

)

Defendant. )

)

)

)

NO. CR18-00422 PHX SPL-003

DEFENDANT SCOTT SPEAR’S

JOINDER IN DEFENDANT LACEY’S

AND LARKIN’S (FIRST) MOTION FOR

FURTHER CLARIFICATION RE

ORDER ALLOWING GOVERNMENT

TO CONTINUE REVIEW OF

PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS

The Defendant, Scott Spear, by and through his attorney, Bruce Feder/Feder Law Office.,

P.A., hereby joins in Defendant Lacey’s and Larkin’s First Motion for Further Clarification Re

Order Allowing the Government to Continue Review of Privileged Communications [452] in all

respects as said Motion applies to him and fully adopts the positions set forth in the Motion as if

fully set forth herein.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of February, 2019.

FEDER LAW OFFICE, P.A.

/s/ Bruce Feder

Attorney for Defendant, Scott Spear

. . .

. . .

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 455 Filed 02/06/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 6th day of February, 2019, I electronically transmitted the

foregoing to the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice

of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Kevin Rapp: Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov

John Kucera: John.Kucera@usdoj.gov

Reginald Jones: Reginald.Jones@usdoj.gov

Peter S. Kozinets: Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States

Anne Chapman: anne@mscclaw.com

Lee Stein: lee@mscclaw.com

Paul Cambria: pcambira@lglaw.com

James Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

Erin McCampbell: emccampbell@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Ronald London: ronnielondon@dwt.com

Janey Henze Cook: janey@henzecookemurphy.com

John Littrell: jlittrell@bmkattorneys.com

Kenneth Miller: kmiller@bmkattorneys.com

Whitney Bernstein: wbernstein@bmkattorneys.com

Michael Piccarreta: mlp@pd-law.com

Stephen M. Weiss: sweiss@karpweiss.com

Michael Kimerer: mdk@kimerer.com

Rhonda Neff: rneff@kimerer.com

Tom Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Gary Lincenberg: gsl@birdmarella.com

Ariel Neuman: aneuman@birdmarella.com

KC Maxwell: kcm@kcmaxlaw.com

David Wakukawa: dsw@kcmaxlaw.com

Seetha Ramachandran: Seetha.Ramachandran@srz.com

Attorneys for the Defense

By: /s/ A. Jones

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 455 Filed 02/06/19 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-18-00408-CV

Style: Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County

v Adan Garza

Date motion filed*: September 14, 2018

Type of motion: Motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions 

granted:

 0 Current Due date: 

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

 The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other: _____________________________________ 

Contrary to appellant’s request to extend the time to file appellant’s brief, no deadline 

for the filing of appellant’s brief has been set because the complete appellate record has 

not yet been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s 

motion as moot. 

Judge's signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: September 20, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 08-20517-06

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

ENRIQUE FARIAS-VALENCIA,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

All parties having signed a consent, on April 16, 2009, this Defendant was referred to

the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1(B) and 636(b)(3) for the

purpose of receiving Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. The Defendant, along with counsel,

appeared before me on April 21, 2009. In open court I examined the Defendant under oath,

confirmed the Defendant’s consent, and then advised and questioned the Defendant regarding

each of the inquiries prescribed by Rule 11(b) of the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE. Based upon the Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND 1) that

the Defendant is competent to tender a plea, 2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly,

intelligently made, and 3) that the offense to which he pled is supported by an independent

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense. Therefore, I have ordered

the preparation of a presentence investigation report.

Case 1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB ECF No. 96, PageID.289 Filed 04/22/09 Page 1 of 2
II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the FEDERAL RULES OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and

Recommendation within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins.

Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984

(6th Cir. 2005). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and

Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security, 474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir.

2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of

any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: April 22, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date, electronically

served on Shane Waller and Elias Escobedo, and served on District Judge Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: April 22, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

Case 1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB ECF No. 96, PageID.290 Filed 04/22/09 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:01-cr-00723-MHM Document 219 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:01-cr-00723-MHM Document 219 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 2
September  29,  1997

Mr.  Duane  Egeland
Chief  Financial  Officer
Dynacraft  Golf  Products,  Inc.
98  James  Street
Newark,  Ohio    43055

     Re:  Listing  on  the  Chicago  Stock  Exchange
          ------------------------------------------

Dear  Mr.  Egeland:

This  notice  is  to  certify  that  the Chicago Stock Exchange ("Exchange") has
approved  the  Common  Stock, without par value (the "Issue"), of Dynacraft Golf
Products,  Inc.  ("Company")  for  listing.   This approval and admission of the
Issue  to  trading  is  subject  to  the  following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<C>  <S>

1.    Assignment to a qualified Chicago Stock Exchange specialist firm.

2.    Completion and submission of an originally executed Application for Listing, all
      required supporting documentation and payment of appropriate listing fees.

3.    Completion and closure of the initial public offering at or above the Minimum
      Offering as defined in the Company's Form SB-2 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

4.    Confirmation of the issuance and distribution, within two days of the day the
      Company ceases the sale of stock, of all stock certificates to all persons
      purchasing shares of the Company's common stock in the initial public
      offering.

5.    Receipt of a representation and confirmation from the Company that a CUSIP
      number identifying the Company's common stock has been included in the file
      of eligible securities maintained by a securities depository registered as a
      clearing agency under Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
      "1934 Act"), specifically, the Depository Trust Company ("DTC").

6.    Submission to the Exchange and the SEC of the appropriate 1934 Act
      Registration Statement and notice of effectiveness thereof from the SEC.
</TABLE>

<PAGE>



Mr.  Duane  Egeland
September  29,  1997
Page  2


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<C>  <S>

7.    Receipt, within 30 trading days of the first day of trading on the Exchange, of
      certified Schedules of Distribution indicating that there are at least 500
      beneficial holders of the Company's common stock.  If the Company is unable
      to demonstrate that there are at least 500 beneficial holders of the common stock,
      the issue may be suspended from trading.
</TABLE>


Please  do  not  hesitate  to  contact me at (312) 663-2423 with any question or
concern  you  may  have.

Sincerely,


/s/  Craig  a.  Gray
     ---------------
   Supervisor,  Listing  Department

cc:  Mr.  Gerald  R.  Broz
     Mr.  Gerald  Sadowski
     Mr.  Drew  Field


                                  EXHIBIT 99.3
Exhibit 10.11.2


 


AMENDMENT ONE TO


THE COCA-COLA COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL THRIFT PLAN


 


This Amendment One to The Coca-Cola Company Supplemental Thrift Plan
(the “Plan”) is adopted by The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (the “Committee”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.4 of the Plan, the Committee has the
authority to amend the Plan;


 


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan to add a Participating Subsidiary;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby
amends the Plan as follows:


 


A
new subsidiary shall be added to Appendix A, Participating Subsidiaries, as
follows:


 


International
Auditors, Inc., effective as of April 1, 2008


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has adopted this Amendment One on the date
shown below, but effective as of the dates indicated above.


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

  BENEFITS COMMITTEE

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date 

  	
  6/18/08

  	
   

  	
  By 

  	
  /s/ Susan M. Fleming
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

KESSLER LAW GROUP

Eric W. Kessler, SBN 009158

9237 E. Via de Ventura, Ste. 230

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

(480) 644-0093 phone

(480) 644-0095 fax

Eric.KesslerLaw@gmail.com

FEDER LAW OFFICE PA

Bruce S. Feder, 004832

2930 E. Camelback Rod., Ste. 160

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135 phone

bf@federlawpa.com

Knapp Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, ) No. 2:18-cr-00422-DJH

)

 Plaintiff, ) AMENDED NOTICE OF CHANGE

v. ) OF ADDRESS OF LAW

) FIRM

Michael Lacey, et al., )

) (The Hon. Diane J. Humetewa)

Defendant. )

Undersigned defense counsel gives notice of his firm’s new address:

KESSLER LAW GROUP

9237 E. Via de Ventura, Ste. 230

Scottsdale, AZ 85258

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1913 Filed 10/26/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this October 25, 2023

 s/ Eric W. Kessler 

Eric W. Kessler, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Spear

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 25, 2023, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

 s/ Eric W. Kessler 

Eric W. Kessler, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Spear

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1913 Filed 10/26/23 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
 GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
 
 
 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (the ‘‘Issuer’’).
 
 I, Leonard Goldberg, the Principal Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
 
 2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
 
 Dated: May 2, 2011

/s/ Leonard GoldbergLeonard Goldberg
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31950-31951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15755]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-31,960, TA-W-31,960A, and TA-W-31,960B]


Bausch and Lomb, Rochester, New York; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for

[[Page 31951]]

Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 13, 1996, applicable to all 
workers of Bausch and Lomb, 465 Paul Road, Rochester, New York, and 1 
Bausch and Lomb Place, Rochester, New York. The notice was published in 
the Federal Register on April 3, 1996 (61 FR 14820).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information provided 
by the company shows that worker separations have occurred at the 
subject firm's 1400 North Goodman Street, Rochester, New York location. 
The workers are engaged in the production of sunglass frames for Bausch 
and Lomb manufacturing facilities.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of sunglass frames. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification to cover the workers of Bausch and Lomb, 1400 North 
Goodman Street, Rochester, New York.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,960 and TA-W-31,960A is 
hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of Bausch and Lomb, 465 Paul Road, Rochester, New 
York (TA-W-31,960), Bausch and Lomb, 1 Bausch and Lomb Place, 
Rochester, New York (TA-W-31,960A), and Bausch and Lomb, 1400 North 
Goodman Street, Rochester, New York (TA-W-31,960B) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
23, 1995 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of June 1996.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-15755 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yang Zhao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)             the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.







/s/ YANG ZHAOYang ZhaoChief Executive OfficerAugust 10, 2012




This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 2 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 3 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 4 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 6 of 9
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 217-1 Filed 07/13/18 Page 9 of 9
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 17-0963

JOSEPH GEETING, RICHARD

GEETING, AND LAURI GEETING

v.

CRAIG DYER AND DYER

CUSTOM INSTALLATION, INC.

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

August 31, 2018

Petitioners' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioners, JOSEPH GEETING, RICHARD GEETING, AND

LAURI GEETING, pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 12th day of October, 2018.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-35,575-29
IN RE JAMES WESL EY MCCA RTNEY, Relator
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NOS. CR920532A & CR920533A IN THE 51S T DIST RICT COURT

F ROM TOM G REEN COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this Court’s orig inal jurisdiction. He contends that he filed two applications for writs of habea s corpus in Tom Gree n County

and his applica

tions have not bee n proper ly forwa rded to this Court. Respondent, the Dis t rict Clerk of Tom Gre en County , shall forwa rd Relator’s habea s appli ca t i o n s t o this Court, respond that Relator has not filed habea s applications in Tom Gre en County , or forwa

rd a copy of an order desig nating issues toge ther with corr espondenc e documenting the date the S tate rece ived R elator’ s habea s applications. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 1 1
. 0 7 , § 3(c) and (d); T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 5). This motion for leave to file wil l be held. Respondent shall comply

with this order within thirty day s from the da

te of this order
.2

Filed: F ebrua

ry 16, 2022 Do not publish
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of
Opencell Biomed Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending
August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|October 13, 2010 | /s/ Mislav
      Pavelic        
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|                 | Mislav Pavelic, President       
|                 | (as Principal Financial Officer)

---