alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Lacey et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

As set forth on the record at the Status Conference held on August 18, 2023, 

IT IS ORDERED that the following one-hundred ten (110) prospective jurors shall 

report for jury selection:

Juror Number

1. 8

2. 23

3. 65

4. 135

5. 136

6. 148

7. 159

8. 192

9. 201

10. 206

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1711 Filed 08/18/23 Page 1 of 6
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

11. 220

12. 280

13. 312

14. 316

15. 324

16. 336

17. 337

18. 410

19. 428

20. 430

21. 433

22. 457

23. 474

24. 509

25. 545

26. 557

27. 559

28. 582

29. 611

30. 622

31. 623

32. 654

33. 676

34. 710

35. 730

36. 818

37. 863

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1711 Filed 08/18/23 Page 2 of 6
- 3 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

38. 864

39. 874

40. 876

41. 939

42. 958

43. 1018

44. 1028

45. 1087

46. 1114

47. 1161

48. 1164

49. 1172

50. 1204

51. 1215

52. 1224

53. 1241

54. 1242

55. 1316

56. 1331

57. 1356

58. 1364

59. 1370

60. 1398

61. 1412

62. 1417

63. 1449

64. 1505

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1711 Filed 08/18/23 Page 3 of 6
- 4 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

65. 1525

66. 1539

67. 1585

68. 1594

69. 1615

70. 1702

71. 1709

72. 1710

73. 1718

74. 1723

75. 1754

76. 1756

77. 1757

78. 1762

79. 1792

80. 1807

81. 1809

82. 1824

83. 1859

84. 2802

85. 2804

86. 2808

87. 2809

88. 2811

89. 2812

90. 2820

91. 2824

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1711 Filed 08/18/23 Page 4 of 6
- 5 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

92. 2834

93. 2837

94. 2844

95. 2849

96. 2855

97. 2857

98. 2858

99. 2860

100. 2868

101. 2869

102. 2873

103. 2876

104. 2880

105. 2884

106. 2885

107. 2892

108. 2905

109. 2908

110. 2911

Dated this 18th day of August, 2023.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1711 Filed 08/18/23 Page 5 of 6
- 6 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1711 Filed 08/18/23 Page 6 of 6
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     I, Andrew B. Shearer, Chief Executive Officer of the IndustrialDistribution Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual    period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”)    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company.
Dated: March 11, 2005
     /s/ Andrew B. Shearer      Andrew B. Shearer     President and     Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16224]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-31-017]

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Refund Report

June 20, 1996.
    Take notice that on June 17, 1996, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing a report of refunds and 
surcharges in compliance with the Stipulation and Agreement approved by 
the Commission on February 16, 1996. National states that the refunds 
and surcharges were disbursed in the form of invoice credits or debits 
to customers receiving the following services: EFT, FT, FT Niagara Zone 
1, FT Niagara Zone 2, FT Niagara Zone 3, and IT Transportation 
Services; ESS, ISS, IAS, FSS, SS-1 and SS-2 Storage Services; and the 
P-1, P-2, IR-1, IR-2 and W-1 Hub Services.
    National further states that a copy of the Refund Report was sent 
to the affected state regulatory agencies, and that each customer 
received a summary including the computations supporting their refund 
or surcharge.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18) CFR 385.211. All such protests 
must be filed on or before June 27, 1996. Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16224 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00397-CR

DERRICK RESHORD WALTON,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 431st District 

Court

of Denton County (F17-2959-431)

December 6, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Case 2:01-cr-00723-MHM Document 230 Filed 07/29/08 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:01-cr-00723-MHM Document 230 Filed 07/29/08 Page 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Smiley, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Drucker
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I, the registrants certifying officer, am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I, the registrants certifying officer, based on my most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, have disclosed
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All deficiencies and weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

December 15, 2007

/s/ Robert Smiley Robert Smiley, Acting Chief
Executive Officer

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Charles R. Johnson, Sr., Appellant

No. 06-23-00015-CV v.

SWEPCO Southwestern Electric Power 

Co., Appellee

Appeal from the 202nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

21C0613-202). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Stevens, Justice 

van Cleef and Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Charles R. Johnson, Sr., pay all costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 12, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 188TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th 

day of September, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Anthony Fernando Strange, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-13-00178-CR

Trial Court No. 41833-A

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Anthony Fernando Strange, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 30th day of April, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
exv10w52






EXHIBIT 10.52




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), by
and between Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola” or the “Company”) and Sanjay K. Jah (the “Executive”) dated
August 4, 2008, is made and entered into as of the 15th day of December, 2008, by and between the
Company and Executive. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement.




     1. Subject in all cases to the prior execution and non-revocation of a release substantially
in the form attached to the Employment Agreement as Exhibit F, notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained in the Employment Agreement (or in any related equity grant agreement), amounts
that are non-qualified deferred compensation under Section 409A that would otherwise be payable,
restricted stock units that would otherwise have been settled, RSU Cash-Out Payments that would
otherwise have been made and benefits that would otherwise be provided, in each case pursuant to
Section 5(a)(i) and (iii), Section 5(b)(i) and (iii) or Section 5(g) shall be paid, with Interest,
or settled, or made, or provided, on the first business day after the date that is six months
following the Executive’s “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A.



     2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Employment
Agreement remain in full force and effect and are unmodified hereby.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MEMSIC, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Yang Zhao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ YANG ZHAO          
|Yang Zhao              
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 15, 2009           

This Certification shall not be deemed part of the Report or incorporated by reference into any of
the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to





18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,





as
      Adopted Pursuant to





Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of RCN Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof, respectively (the “Report”), Peter D.
      Aquino, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
      PETER
      D. AQUINO


Peter
      D.
      Aquino


March
      14,
      2006
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 239 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 239 Filed 07/30/18 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      23.2**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**






To
      the
      Board of Directors and Stockholders of CTI Industries Corporation




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-76006 and 333-76008), of our report dated February 18, 2004 (with
      respect to the first paragraph of Note 6, April 14, 2004, and with respect
      to
      the third paragraph of Note 3, October 1, 2004), relating to our audit of the
      consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flow of
      CTI
      Industries Corporation and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003
      included in the 2005 annual report on Form 10-K.






/s/
      Eisner LLP




New
      York, New York


April
      12, 2006
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 7, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-15306

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-00013-CR-WS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

DAVID ANTHONY MORRISON, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

 (August 7, 2008)

Before TJOFLAT, DUBINA and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

William Hughes, counsel for David Morrison in this direct criminal appeal,
2

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Morrison’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

In re:

CHARLES A. SNOOKS AND 

RHONDA L. SNOOKS,

Debtors,

MICHAEL A. STEVENSON,

Plaintiff 

Civil No. 08-CV-14180-DT

Hon. John Feikens 

v. Magistrate Mona K. Majzoub 

POLYAMERICA, LTD., d/b/a Global

Enterprises, Inc. and Fabribond

LLC, jointly and severally

Defendants 

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

I have before me, Magistrate Mona K. Majzoub’s Report and Recommendation

(“Report”). In her Report, Magistrate Majzoub recommends that I deny Polyamerica Ltd.’s

Motion for mandatory Withdrawal of Reference and deny without prejudice Polyamerica Ltd.’s

Motion for Withdrawal based on its right to a jury trial. Neither party has filed objections to

Magistrate Majzoub’s report during the time set aside for doing so. I find that Magistrate

Mazjoub has throughly and correctly analyzed the issues and I agree with her recommendation. 

For these reasons, I ADOPT IN FULL Magistrate Majzoub’s Report and DENY Polyamerica

Ltd.’s Motion for mandatory Withdrawal of Reference and DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Polyamerica Ltd.’s Motion for Withdrawal based on its right to a jury trial. I strongly

2:08-cv-14180-JF-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 01/29/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 107
recommend that counsel agree to have this matter presented to a jury in Chief Judge Rhodes’

Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: January 29, 2009 s/ John Feikens 

John Feikens

United States District Judge

Proof of Service

I hereby certify that the foregoing order was served on

the attorneys/parties of record on January 29, 2009, by

U.S. first class mail or electronic means.

s/Carol Cohron 

Case Manager

2:08-cv-14180-JF-MKM Doc # 14 Filed 01/29/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 108
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION


OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Capital City
Energy Group, Inc. do hereby certify that:







(a)
            The
      Form 10-Q of Capital City Energy Group, Inc. for the period ended March
      31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(b)
            Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Capital City Energy
      Group, Inc.











Dated:  May
20,
2008                                                                                           /s/ Timothy W.
Crawford


Timothy W. Crawford


Chief Executive Officer








Dated:  May
20,
2008                                                                                           /s/ David
Beule


David Beule


Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 23.3

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated April 10, 2002, except for Note 3, which is
dated April 15, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial statements
included in the Annual Report of CTI Industries Corporation and Subsidiaries on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of CTI
Industries Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-76006 and
333-76008) and SB-2 (No. 333-31969).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------

Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ELIZABETH A STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 14249, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov)

MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov)

PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov) 

ANDREW C. STONE (Ariz. Bar No. 026543, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov)

JOHN J. KUCERA (Cal. Bar No. 274184, john.kucera@usdoj.gov)

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

Two Renaissance Square

40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

BRIAN BENCZKOWSKI

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov) 

Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Dan Hyer,

Defendant.

CR-18-00422-5-PHX- SMB (BSB)

MOTION TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING

(Second Request)

The United States of America hereby requests this Court continue the sentencing 

currently set for May 20, 2019, at 3:30 p.m. for defendant Dan Hyer for a period of six 

months because it is in the interest of justice. Counsel for defendant has no objection to 

this motion.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 518 Filed 04/05/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Respectfully submitted this 5th day of April, 2019.

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney

District of Arizona

/s Kevin Rapp

KEVIN M. RAPP

MARGARET PERLMETER

PETER S. KOZINETS

ANDREW C. STONE

JOHN J. KUCERA

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

BRIAN BENCZKOWSKI

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES

Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this same date, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: 

K C Maxwell 

Maxwell Law PC 

899 Ellis St. 

San Francisco, CA 94109 

415-494-8887 

Email: kcm@kcmaxlaw.com

Attorneys for defendant Dan Hyer

s/Angela Schuetta

US Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 518 Filed 04/05/19 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 25, 2017

s0717

Order 

Clerk

July 25, 2017

154326

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154326

COA: 326725

St Clair CC: 14-001045-FH;

14-001046-FH

DIANE FERGUSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

WILDER, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.