alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-20517-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

D-5 RODRIGO FARIAS-ZUNIGA,

Defendants.

__________________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, ACCEPTING

DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF GUILTY AS TO COUNT ONE, AND TAKING THE RULE 11

PLEA AGREEMENT UNDER ADVISEMENT

A plea hearing was conducted on April 21, 2009, by United States Magistrate Judge Charles

E. Binder pursuant to the defendant’s consent. The magistrate judge issued his report on April 22,

2009, recommending that this Court accept the defendant’s plea of guilty. As of today’s date, no

party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The failure to

file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit

Fed’n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object

to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and

conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt

# 97] is ADOPTED.

1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB Doc # 107 Filed 05/12/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 309
-2-

It is further ORDERED that the defendant’s plea of guilt as to count one is ACCEPTED,

and the Rule 11 Plea Agreement [Dkt. # 90] is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: May 12, 2009

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on May 12, 2009.

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS

1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB Doc # 107 Filed 05/12/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 310
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 (a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Stephen F. Ghiglieri, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeurogesX, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting that are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ Stephen F. GhiglieriStephen F. GhiglieriChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 965 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 965

  Repealing rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2009

  Ms. Bean (for herself, Mr. Cooper, and Mr. Mitchell) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Repealing rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
          relating to the statutory limit on the public debt.

    Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives (relating to the statutory limit on the public debt) is 
repealed and rule XXIX is redesignated as rule XXVIII.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                   |  |        |  |                                                      
|------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/ Jonathan J. Ledecky                              
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Jonathan J. Ledecky                                  
|                   |  | Title: |  | President and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer)
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |        |  |                                                      
|                   |  |        |  | /s/ Eric J. Watson                                   
|                   |  | Name:  |  | Eric J. Watson                                       
|                   |  | Title: |  | Chairman of the Board and Treasurer                  
|                   |  |        |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 13, 2009 | By:  | /      s/ Mark V. Noffke                                              |
|----------------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |      |        Mark      V. Noffke         |
|                       |      |                                                                  |
|                       |      |   Chief      Financial Officer (principal financialofficer) |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Jun Wang, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      August 12, 2010
              By:
              /s/Jun
      WangJun
      Wang
                Chief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### In re MARRIAGE OF William J. BALMER, Jr. and Elizabeth M. Balmer. William J. BALMER, Jr., Petitioner/Respondent, v. Elizabeth M. BALMER, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 64740.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Feb. 21, 1995.

M. Deborah Benoit, Susman, Sehermer, Rimmel & Shifrin, Clayton, for appellant.

Steve Vossmeyer, Newburger & Vossmeyer, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a dissolution case. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. *Murphy v. Carron,*536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Executive Compensation Summary Sheet



 Exhibit 10.29 
 Sunoco, Inc. Executive Compensation Summary Sheet 
 The following is a summary of the 2009 base salaries of the named
executive officers of Sunoco, Inc.: 
  

				
	 Name/Title
	  	Base Salary
	 Lynn L. Elsenhans
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	1,240,000
	 Terence P. Delaney
 Interim Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	280,000
	 Robert W. Owens
 Senior Vice President, Marketing
	  	$	510,450
	 Vincent J. Kelley
 Senior Vice President, Refining and Supply
	  	$	540,000
	 Michael J. Thomson
 Senior Vice President, Sunoco, Inc. and
 President, SunCoke Energy, Inc.
	  	$	458,350
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: September 19, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg and Gopi 

K. Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant 

Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 8):

9:10 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Carl Ferrer examined further. Exhibits 651, 655, 103, 103a, 

104, 104a, 1881, 1881a, 1696, 1697, 1697a, 661, 912, 662b, 846, and 846a are admitted. 10:43 a.m. 

Recess.

11:03 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 670, 670a, 113, 113a, 

115, 115b, 850, 850a, 119, and 203 are admitted. 12:03 p.m. Jury exits courtroom. Discussion held re: 

Exhibit 85 and 85a. Ms. Bertrand makes an oral Motion for Mistrial. Argument heard. IT IS 

ORDERED denying the oral Motion for Mistrial. 12:23 p.m. Recess. 

1:04 p.m. Court reconvenes. 1:05 p.m. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1698, 1698a, 

1130, 42, 42a, 986, 986a, 120a, 711, 714a, 1827a, 1200a, and 1896 are admitted. 2:40 p.m. Jury exits. 

Discussion held with counsel. 2:43 p.m. Recess.

3:01 p.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held re: Exhibits. 3:15 p.m. Jury present. Witness examined 

further. Exhibits 120, 1911b, 733a, 1919, 1919a, 146, 532, 532a, 725, 725b, 724, 1829, 1829a, 1830, 

1830b, 154, and 154a are admitted. 4:35 p.m. Court in recess until Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 

9:00 a.m.

Court Reporter Elaine Cropper/Hilda Lopez

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 9:10 AM

Stop: 4:35 PM

Total: 6hrs 6min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1799 Filed 09/19/23 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3882916.1

DEFENDANT JOHN BRUNST’S NOTICE OF JOINDER 

Gary S. Lincenberg (admitted pro hac vice)

 glincenberg@birdmarella.com

Ariel A. Neuman (admitted pro hac vice)

 aneuman@birdmarella.com

Gopi K. Panchapakesan (admitted pro hac vice)

 gkp@birdmarella.com

BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM,

DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C.

1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor

Los Angeles, California 90067-2561

Telephone: (310) 201-2100

Facsimile: (310) 201-2110

Attorneys for Defendant John Brunst

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:18-cr-00422-004-PHX-DJH

DEFENDANT JOHN BRUNST’S 

NOTICE OF JOINDER IN 

DEFENDANT JOYE VAUGHT’S 

OBJECTION TO FRYE-COOPER

HEARING AND MOTION TO 

VACATE HEARING

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1684 Filed 08/08/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3882916.1 2

DEFENDANT JOHN BRUNST’S NOTICE OF JOINDER 

Defendant John Brunst, by and through his undersigned counsel, joins in Defendant 

Joye Vaught’s Objection to Frye-Cooper Hearing and Motion to Vacate Hearing

(Dkt. 1681) (“Motion”). 

Mr. Brunst agrees with the arguments made in the Motion. Mr. Brunst adopts the 

positions set forth in the Motion as if fully set forth herein. 

DATED: August 8, 2023 Respectfully submitted,

Gary S. Lincenberg

Ariel A. Neuman

Gopi K. Panchapakesan

Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim,

Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.

By: /s/ Gary S. Lincenberg 

Gary S. Lincenberg 

Attorneys for Defendant John Brunst

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1684 Filed 08/08/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Don Marcos Trading Co. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Earl
T. Shannon and Scott W. Bodenweber, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
November 7, 2008




/s/ Earl T.
Shannon


Earl T.
Shannon


President





Date:
November 7, 2008




/s/ Scott W.
Bodenweber


Scott W.
Bodenweber


Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1  I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Opencell Biomed, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: October 15, 2008 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002








The
undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
(the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended May 31, 2008 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











/s/James B.
Wiegand___________________________
 James B.
Wiegand


Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


July 14,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15037]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5520-8]


Settlement Under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; In the Matter 
of Waukegan Paint and Lacquer Company, Inc., Waukegan, IL

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Settlement of CERCLA Section 107 Cost Recovery Matter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to settle a cost recovery claim with certain 
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) with regard to past costs at the 
Waukegan Paint and Lacquer Company, Inc. Site in Waukegan, Illinois. 
EPA is authorized under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as 
amended (``CERCLA'') to enter into this administrative settlement.
    Response costs totalling $165,118 were incurred by EPA in 
connection with an emergency removal action at the Waukegan Paint and 
Lacquer Site. On February 23, 1995, U.S. EPA sent the PRPs a demand for 
reimbursement of the Agency's past costs. The Settling Parties have 
agreed to pay $94,000 to settle EPA's claim for reimbursement of 
response costs related to the Site. EPA is proposing to approve this 
administrative settlement because it reimburses EPA, in part, for costs 
incurred during its response activities at this Site.

DATES: Comments on this administrative settlement must be received by 
no later than July 15, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments relating to this settlement, Docket Number 
V-W-96-C-325, should be sent to Cynthia N. Kawakami, Associate Regional 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Mail Code: CM-
29A, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Copies of the Agreement and the Administrative 
Record for this Site are available at the following address for review. 
It is strongly recommended that you telephone Ms. Mila Bensing at (312) 
353-2006 before visiting the Region 5 Office. U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, Superfund Division, Emergency Response 
Branch, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.

    Authority: The Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601 
et seq.
William E. Muno,
Director, Superfund Division.
[FR Doc. 96-15037 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
NOTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ MGI DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY S.A., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

DUPLO U.S.A. CORP., Defendant

- Appellee

______________________
2024

- 1640

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:22

- cv

- 00979

- DOC

KES

, Judge David O. Carter.

______________________
O R D E R The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that: (1) The proce eding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). Case: 24-1640 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 07/22/2024MGI D IGITAL T ECHNOLOGY S.A. V

. D UPLO U.S.A. C ORP

. 2

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

July 22, 2024 Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 22, 2024 Case: 24-1640 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 07/22/2024