alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1274 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 3B

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-11 Filed 03/12/19 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-11 Filed 03/12/19 Page 2 of 2
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 589 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Minority Donor Awareness Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2009 

Mr. CLAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Minority Donor 

Awareness Day. 

Whereas more than 96,000 individuals in the United States 

are on the national waiting list for organ transplants; 

Whereas in 2006, 50 percent of individuals on the national 

waiting list for organ transplants were racial or ethnic 

minorities, including more than 27,000 African-Americans, nearly 16,000 Hispanics and Latinos, more than 

6,000 Asians and Pacific Islanders, and nearly 900 

American Indians and Alaska Natives; 

Whereas individuals on the national waiting list for organ 

transplants are most likely to find well-matched organs 

within their own racial or ethnic group, but minority 

organ donors account for only about 30 percent of the 

available donor pool; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 589 IH 

Whereas 20 million individuals in the United States suffer 

from chronic kidney disease; 

Whereas more than 80,000 individuals in the United States 

die each year from chronic kidney disease; 

Whereas African-Americans represented less than 13 percent 

of the population in the United States in 2005, but represented nearly 35 percent of individuals in the United 

States requiring a kidney transplant on the national waiting list for organ transplants; 

Whereas 17 individuals die each day waiting for organ transplants due to a shortage of donated organs; and 

Whereas the Minority Organ and Tissue Transplant Education Program, established by the National Institute of 

Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, 

observes National Minority Donor Awareness Day on August 1 to increase awareness of organ donation among 

African-American, Hispanic, Latino, Asian, Alaskan Native, Pacific Islander, and Native American populations 

and to recognize minority donors and their families: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Minority Donor Awareness Day; 

4 (2) recognizes the strength, resilience, struggle, 

5 and courage of all individuals in the United States 

6 suffering from chronic kidney disease; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 589 IH 

1 (3) salutes health care professionals and volun2 teers, families of organ donors, and all organ donors. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 19, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 19, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0273. RYAN ALEXANDER MAYS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2007CR1486
EXHIBIT 3A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-6 Filed 04/17/19 Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANTTO

SECTION906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEYACTOF 2002(18U.S.C. 1350)

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and nine months ended June 30, 2020(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I,ArthurH. Penn, ChiefExecutive Officerofthe Registrant,herebycertify, tothe best ofmyknowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

| /s/ Arthur H. Penn |
|--------------------|
| Name:              |   | Arthur H. Penn |
| Title:             |   | Chief Executive Officer |
| Date:              |   | August 5, 2020 |
Order entered July 1 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00028
- CV THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V. MESQUITE CREEK DEVEL OPMENT, INC., A GEOR GIA CORPORATION, A ND RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., A GEORGIA CORP ORATION, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 14
- 05842
- B



### O RDER
T he clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated April 10, 2019, we notified the Dallas County Clerk that the clerk’s record was past due and directed the Dallas County Clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to fil e, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the clerk’s record or (2) written verification that appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We notify appellant that if we receive verification the clerk’s rec ord has not been paid for or that arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record have not been made, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b).We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

John Warren Dallas Co unty Clerk All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1604]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 96-002]


Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a forthcoming meeting of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel.

DATES: February 29, 1996, 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 300 E Street, 
SW, Room 9H40, Washington, DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Frank L. Manning, Code Q-1, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546 (202/358-0914).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel will 
present its annual report to the NASA Administrator. This is pursuant 
to carrying out its statutory duties for which the Panel reviews, 
identifies, evaluates, and advises on those program activities, 
systems, procedures, and management activities that can contribute to 
program risk. Priority is given to those programs that involve the 
safety of human flight. The major subjects covered will be the Space 
Shuttle, Space Station, and Aeronautical Operations. The Aerospace 
Safety Advisory Panel is chaired by Paul M. Johnstone and is composed 
of 8 members and 6 consultants. The meeting will be open to the public 
up to the capacity of the room (approximately 50 persons including 
members of the Panel).

Type of Meeting

    Open.

Agenda

Thursday, February 29

2 p.m.--Presentation of the findings and recommendations of the 
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel.
3:30--Adjourn.

    All attendees will be requested to sign an attendance register.

    Dated: January 23, 1996.
Timothy M. Sullivan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 96-1604 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: October 12, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg and Gopi 

K. Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant 

Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 17):

8:48 a.m. Court reconvenes. For the reasons stated, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ previous oral 

Motion for Mistrial is denied. Discussion held re: Exhibits. IT IS ORDERED the Court’s rulings 

stand. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting in part Defendants’ Joint Motion (Doc. 1822) as set 

forth on the record. 9:14 a.m. Jury present. Mickey Hansen examined further. 9:18 a.m. CrossExamination by Mr. Panchapakesan. Exhibit 462 is admitted. 10:14 a.m. Jury exits courtroom. 10:18 

a.m. Recess. 

10:33 a.m. Court reconvenes. 10:33 a.m. Jury present. No additional cross-examination. Redirect. 

10:45 a.m. Witness excused. Anya Beck sworn and examined. Exhibit 1602 is admitted. 11:08 a.m. 

Cross-Examination by Mr. Feder. 11:51 a.m. Cross-Examination by Mr. Eisenberg. 11:53. No 

additional cross-examination. Redirect. Witness excused. Jury exits courtroom. 11:56 a.m. Recess. 

1:10 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury present. Lin Howard sworn and examined. 1:27 p.m. CrossExamination by Mr. Cambria. 1:36 p.m. No additional cross-examination and no redirect. Witness 

excused. Eric Murray sworn and examined. Exhibits 1971, 1971a-b, 1967, and 1967a-b are admitted. 

2:41 p.m. Recess. 

3:01 p.m. Court reconvenes. 3:04 p.m. Jury present. Witness examined further. Exhibits 1953, 1953a,

and 2044 are admitted. 3:30 p.m. Cross-Examination by Ms. Bertrand. 4:11 p.m. Jury exits courtroom. 

4:14 p.m. Court in recess until Friday, October 13, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

Court Reporter Cathy Taylor/Teri Veres

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 8:48 AM

Stop: 4:14 PM

Total: 5hrs 37min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1854 Filed 10/12/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geostar Mineral Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Andriy Protskiv, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 11thday of June, 2007.

ANDRIY PROTSKIVAndriy ProtskivChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer






































---
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

2AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER (6SHFLI\)

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS  

PAPER COPY

3')HPDLO

$6&,,HPDLO

14 DAYS  

7 DAYSH[SHGLWHG  

DAILY

 

HOURLY

 

REALTIME

 

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025(7+$121()250$7,

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Andrew C. Stone (602) 514-7500 09/10/2021

U.S. Attorney's Office

40 N. Central Ave., Ste. 1800 Phoenix AZ 85004

CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB Susan M. Brnovich 9/8/2021

U.S. v. Michael Lacey, et al. Phoenix AZ

✔

✔

Trial (PM session) 09/08/2021

✔

✔

andrew.stone@usdoj.gov; marjorie.dieckman@usdoj.gov

s/Andrew C. Stone (R21AZX90250)

09/10/2021

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1297 Filed 09/10/21 Page 1 of 1
Order entered February 22, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01250-CV

MICHAEL HACKBARTH, Appellant

V.

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-06745

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 20, 2017 unopposed motion to extend time to 

file reply brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief shall be filed by 

March 14, 2017.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Case 2:18-cv-00064-DJH--DKD Document 1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:18-cv-00064-DJH--DKD Document 1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:18-cv-00064-DJH--DKD Document 1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:18-cv-00064-DJH--DKD Document 1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:18-cv-00064-DJH--DKD Document 1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:18-cv-00064-DJH--DKD Document 1 Filed 01/08/18 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 24

                           SPECIFIC POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Richard R. Jaros do make, constitute and
appoint Timothy J. Stoklosa, RCN Corporation's Chief Financial Officer, as my
true and lawful attorney for me and in my name:

1. I authorize said attorney in fact to specifically execute in my name and on
my behalf the RCN Corporation Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002, and to file said form to the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 5th
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and relative instruments in writing which
I deem requisite or proper to effectuate specifically the execution and delivery
of the above-mentioned form with the same validity as I could, if personally
present, and I hereby ratify and affirm that my said attorney as I may deem to
act for me, shall do, by virtue of these presents, herein set forth by me.

2. All rights, powers and authority of said attorney in fact to exercise any and
all of the specific rights and powers herein granted shall commence and be in
full force and effect as of the date hereof, and such specific rights, powers
and authority shall remain in full force and effect thereafter until termination
in writing by me.

3. I give to said attorney in fact full power and authority to appoint a
substitute to perform all such of the acts that said attorney in fact is by this
instrument authorized to perform, with the right to revoke such appointment of
substitute at pleasure.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and seal this __ day of ___________,
2003.

______________________(SEAL) Richard R. Jaros

                                    WITNESS:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 776 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 776

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 19, 2010.
Whereas, December 14, 2009, marks the centennial of the founding of the 
        Dartmouth Outing Club (DOC) at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New 
        Hampshire;
Whereas the DOC, the oldest and largest collegiate outing club in the Nation, 
        was founded by Fred Harris, Dartmouth Class of 1911;
Whereas the DOC has continually promoted environmental stewardship through 
        student leadership;
Whereas the DOC has promoted environmental stewardship by caring for over 100 
        miles of hiking trails, including over 70 miles of the Appalachian 
        National Scenic Trail from Route 12 in Woodstock, Vermont, to Route 112 
        in Woodstock, New Hampshire, as well as maintaining cabins and shelters 
        and teaching wilderness skills, sports, and safety to students and 
        community members;
Whereas the DOC is a student-run club and has consistently focused on student 
        leadership by providing students with the opportunity to lead by 
        carrying out projects which have included constructing the Class of '66 
        Lodge, organizing the largest freshman trips program in the country, and 
        directing sub-clubs that together allow students to learn about, 
        appreciate, and experience the natural environment year-round;
Whereas a division of the DOC which promoted environmental sustainability and 
        conservation has displayed leadership in environmental conservation by 
        testifying before Congress regarding the Alaska National Interests Lands 
        Conservation Act in the spring of 1977;
Whereas the DOC has promoted sustainability by having Dartmouth students buy and 
        re-engineer a passenger bus into the DOC's Big Green Bus, powered by 
        vegetable oil and solar energy;
Whereas, on June 16, 2009, 15 Dartmouth College students began the Big Green 
        Bus' fifth annual cross-country trip, traveling 11,300 miles to promote 
        environmental awareness; and
Whereas throughout 2009, the Dartmouth Outing Club, along with current members 
        and alumni of Dartmouth College, took part in Centennial Celebrations 
        for the organization by participating in a 100-mile hike of Outing Club 
        trails, a Riverfest on the Connecticut River, the 63rd annual Woodsmen's 
        Weekend, and a hike of the entire Appalachian National Scenic Trail from 
        Georgia to Maine by students and alumni simultaneously in different 
        sections: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the Dartmouth 
Outing Club of Hanover, New Hampshire, for 100 years of service to the United 
States and its wilderness, and commends the Club's ongoing commitment to further 
environmental stewardship and student leadership.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Raymond MILLER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 68689.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

May 28, 1996.

Robert L. King, East St. Louis, for appellant.

Gerard F. Hempstead, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRAHAN, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Raymond Miller appeals from the judgment rendered in favor of Defendant Burlington Northern Railroad Company entered upon a jury verdict in an action for personal injury brought under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51. Plaintiffs points on appeal assign error to the trial court’s rulings regarding jury instructions. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).