alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1041 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1041

 To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to modify the applicability of 
certain requirements to double hulled tankers transporting oil in bulk 
                    in Prince William Sound, Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2009

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Begich) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 to modify the applicability of 
certain requirements to double hulled tankers transporting oil in bulk 
                    in Prince William Sound, Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUAL ESCORT VESSELS FOR DOUBLE HULLED TANKERS IN PRINCE 
              WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA.

    (a) In General.--Section 4116(c) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 
(46 U.S.C. 3703 note; Public Law 101-380) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Not later than 6 months'' and inserting 
        the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Not later than 180 days''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Prince william sound, alaska.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The requirement in paragraph (1) 
                relating to single hulled tankers in Prince William 
                Sound, Alaska, described in that paragraph being 
                escorted by at least 2 towing vessels or other vessels 
                considered to be appropriate by the Secretary 
                (including regulations promulgated in accordance with 
                section 3703(a)(3) of title 46, United States Code, as 
                set forth in part 168 of title 33, Code of Federal 
                Regulations (as in effect on March 1, 2009) 
                implementing this subsection with respect to those 
                tankers) shall apply to double hulled tankers over 
                5,000 gross tons transporting oil in bulk in Prince 
                William Sound, Alaska.
                    ``(B) Implementation of requirements.--The 
                Secretary of the Federal agency with jurisdiction over 
                the Coast Guard shall carry out subparagraph (A) by 
                order without notice and hearing pursuant to section 
                553 of title 5 of the United States Code.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE 

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 
 1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 
 2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andthe results of operations of the Company. 

Date:    March 20, 2019 

 

(signed) John E. Peck
John E. Peck, Chief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and will beretained by HopFed Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933. 
**
Exhibit G 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-7 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Date Amount Page Bates

12/31/2015 811,424.07 1112 DOJ-BP-0005015031

1/21/2016 819,927.00 1136 DOJ-BP-0005015031

1/21/2016 819,928.00 1137 DOJ-BP-0005015031

1/25/2016 674,754.00 1140 DOJ-BP-0005015031

2/2/2016 459,450.59 1149 DOJ-BP-0005015031

2/2/2016 1,985,703.95 1149 DOJ-BP-0005015031

2/24/2016 2,904,483.00 1173 DOJ-BP-0005015031

2/29/2016 470,846.73 1182 DOJ-BP-0005015031

2/29/2016 802,469.81 1182 DOJ-BP-0005015031

3/23/2016 300,437.00 1204 DOJ-BP-0005015031

3/31/2016 429,808.62 1219 DOJ-BP-0005015031

3/31/2016 2,964,567.98 1219 DOJ-BP-0005015031

4/18/2016 1,328,421.00 1237 DOJ-BP-0005015031

4/18/2016 1,105,197.00 1237 DOJ-BP-0005015031

4/29/2016 3,625,726.66 1257 DOJ-BP-0005015031

5/18/2016 1,476,505.00 1274 DOJ-BP-0005015031

5/18/2016 264,438.00 1274 DOJ-BP-0005015031

5/31/2016 3,171,675.80 1295 DOJ-BP-0005015031

5/31/2016 432,961.87 1295 DOJ-BP-0005015031

6/20/2016 842,878.00 1304 DOJ-BP-0005015031

6/30/2016 3,076,147.75 1318 DOJ-BP-0005015031

6/30/2016 414,087.42 1318 DOJ-BP-0005015031

7/27/2016 438,818.86 1335 DOJ-BP-0005015031

7/27/2016 3,252,681.62 1336 DOJ-BP-0005015031

8/16/2016 804,250.00 1350 DOJ-BP-0005015031

8/31/2016 3,171,264.42 1367 DOJ-BP-0005015031

8/31/2016 400,357.22 1368 DOJ-BP-0005015031

8/31/2016 2,000,000.00 1368 DOJ-BP-0005015031

Total 39,249,211.37

Payments from Website Tech (BB&T x2008)

12/31/2015 to 8/31/2016

 to Cereus Properties (Arizona Bank and Trust x6211)

USAO-BP-0032733

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-7 Filed 08/19/21 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Mission Mining Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I,
Amit Jain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: June 23, 2020 | By: | /s/ Amit Jain                 
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|                     |     | Amit Jain                     
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer       
|                     |     | (Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.13


 


AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED STOCK
UNIT AWARD AGREEMENTS


FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 


WHEREAS, Interline Brands, Inc.
(the “Company”) has previously made grants of deferred stock units to
non-employee directors pursuant to the terms of the Interline Brands, Inc. 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan (as heretofore amended from time to time, the “Plan”) and
award agreements thereunder (the “DSU
Agreements”);


 


WHEREAS, Section 11(t) of the Plan
provides that if the Committee (each capitalized but undefined term shall have
the meaning ascribed to such term in the Plan) determines that any amounts
payable under the Plan will be taxable to a Participant under Section 409A
of the Code and related Treasury guidance prior to payment to such Participant
of such amount, the Company may adopt such amendments to the Plan and Awards
and appropriate policies and procedures that the Committee determines necessary
or appropriate to preserve the intended tax treatment of the benefits provided
by the Plan and Awards thereunder and/or take such other actions as the
Committee determines necessary or appropriate to avoid or limit the imposition
of an additional tax under Section 409A of the Code; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that it is
necessary and appropriate to make the amendments contained herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, each outstanding DSU Agreement is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the date hereof:


 


1.             Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the DSU
Agreement, a Change in Control shall not be a distribution event thereunder
unless such event satisfies the definition of a change in the ownership or
effective control of a corporation, or a change in the ownership of a
substantial portion of the assets of a corporation pursuant to Section 409A
of the Code and any Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder.


 


2.             The phrase “as soon as reasonably practicable” (or words
of similar import), each time it occurs in the DSU Agreement, shall be
interpreted to mean (if not followed by a more definitive time for payment):  “as soon as reasonably practicable (but in no
event later than thirty (30) days)”.


 


3.             Continuing Effect of the Agreements.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the
provisions of each Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


4.             Governing Law. 
This amendment shall be governed by, construed under, and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York applicable to agreements made
and to be wholly performed within that State, without regard to its conflict of
laws provisions or any conflict of laws provisions of any other jurisdiction
which would cause the application of any law other than that of the State of
New York.


 


	
   

  	
  INTERLINE
  BRANDS, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/ Michael J. Grebe

  
	
   

  	
  Name:  Michael J. Grebe

  
	
   

  	
  Title:   Chairman, CEO & President
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), Robert C. Bowen, the Chief Executive Officer of Scientific
Learning Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 1.The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2003, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and 2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 10, 2005 /s/ Robert C. BowenRobert C. Bowen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 This certification accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date
of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants. 

No. 18-CR-00422-SPL 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STAY OF 

SEIZURE OF FUNDS IN ATTORNEYS’ 

TRUST ACCOUNTS

Before the Court is Defendants James Larkin, Michael Lacey, Scott Spear, and John Brunst 

(“Defendants”) Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for Immediate 

Hearing. Defendants request an order from the Court staying the government from executing 

seizure warrants on funds held in nine attorneys’ trust accounts for the payment of attorneys’ fees 

in connection with Defendants in the above-captioned criminal case and related litigation.1

 Doc.

374, Affidavit at 10-14; Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and 

Request for Immediate Hearing at footnote 2. For good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the relief requested in Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Stay 

Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for Immediate Hearing is temporarily granted pending a 

 1

 Specifically, Defendants move for an order staying the seizure of the attorney trust accounts 

identified in Doc. 374, the Warrant Affidavit, at 10-14 as to Account nos. 28 (Bank of the West 

account xxx1363), 29 (Wells Fargo account xxxx2052), 30 (SunTrust Bank account xxxx7906), 

33 (Citibank account xxxx4039), 34 (US Bank account xxxx1235), 35 (US Bank account 

xxxx6952), 37 (JP Morgan Chase bank account xxxx4381), 38 (JP Morgan Chase bank account 

xxxx9698), and 40 (JP Morgan Chase bank account xxxx5397).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 376-1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

hearing scheduled for November 16, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington 

Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Steven P. Logan, or at a date thereafter as this Court may 

set. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D) will 

occur as a result of the grant of this Order.

DATED this _____ day of ______________, 2018.

_________________________________

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 376-1 Filed 11/14/18 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sally Holdings LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Mark J. Flaherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | By:                                                   | /s/ Mark J. Flaherty |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
|   | Mark J. Flaherty                                      |
|   | Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer of |
|   | Sally Holdings LLC                                    |

 

 

August 5, 2009

 

----
EX-10.15






Exhibit 10.15




AMENDMENT TO THE

FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION

EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN




     WHEREAS, FirstMerit Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the “Corporation”), adopted the
FirstMerit Corporation Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), originally effective as
of February 13, 1987, and amended and restated effective as of August 28, 1995, January 1, 2001 and
December 31, 2008; and



     WHEREAS, Section 9.07 of the Plan provides that the Corporation may amend the Plan from time
to time, provided that such amendment does not reduce the benefits or rights of any Member (as
defined in the Plan) or his Beneficiary (as defined in the Plan) accrued prior to the date of such
amendment; and



     WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to make certain amendments to the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Corporation hereby amends the Plan, effective as of January 8, 2009, by:


1. Deleting Section 2.03 in its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:




     “Section 2.03 “Attained Age” shall mean the age of a Member as of his or her last
birthday. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of Section 4.02, the Attained Age of the CEO
shall be increased by six (6) years, unless the CEO’s employment is terminated for Cause (as such
term is defined in the CEO Employment Agreement).”


2. Deleting Section 2.37 in its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:




     “Section 2.37 For purposes of determining a Member’s Vested Percentage, a “Year of
Service” shall mean a period of twelve (12) consecutive months commencing on the date that an
employee of the Employer first becomes a Member of this Plan, or on any anniversary of such date,
during which the Member completes at least One Thousand (1,000) Hours of Service (as defined in the
Qualified Plan); provided, however, that the Committee, in its sole discretion, may credit a Member
with Years of Service for purposes of determining such Member’s Vested Percentage with respect to
any period prior to the date that the Member first became a Member of this Plan, regardless of
whether the Member was an employee of the Employer during all or a portion of such prior period.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of calculating his Vested Percentage, the CEO shall be
credited with six (6) additional Years of Service, unless the CEO’s employment is terminated for
Cause (as such term is defined in the CEO Employment Agreement).”


4. Deleting Section 2.08 in its entirety and by substituting therefor the following:




     “Section 2.08 “CEO” shall mean the Chief Executive Officer of FirstMerit Corporation
as of January 8, 2009.”


5. The provisions of this Amendment that relate to Paul Greig shall only be modified or further
amended upon the mutual agreement of the Corporation and Paul Greig.




1









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is adopted this 8th day of January, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	FIRSTMERIT CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Christopher J. Maurer
 

	 	 
	 	 	Print Name:  Christopher J. Maurer — H.R.	 	 
	 	 	Title:   Executive Vice President	 	 






2
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 23.1
        CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-87213,
        No. 333-43042, No. 333-91426, No. 333-109191, No. 333-126649) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive
        Plan, 1999 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2002
        CEO Option Plan, and Milestone Equity Incentive Plan of Scientific Learning Corporation of our report
        dated February 15, 2006 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Scientific Learning
        Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.
      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

|                         
|-------------------------
|San Francisco, California
|March 5, 2007            

|
|
#### Lavelle SMITH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State.

No. 2-94-315-CR.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth.

July 13, 1995.

Anthony D. Lyons, Dallas, for appellant.

Tim Curry, Criminal Dist. Atty., Betty Marshall and Charles M. Mallin, Asst. Chiefs Appellate Section, Danielle A. LeGault, John Hardin, Jay Lapham, Asst. Crim. Dist. At-tys., for appellee.

Before DAUPHINOT, RICHARDS and JOE L. DRAUGHN (Assigned), JJ.

OPINION

DAUPHINOT, Justice.

Appellant, Lavelle Smith,1 was convicted of first degree aggravated assault of a peace officer upon his plea of not guilty to the trial court. The court found him guilty and, upon his plea of true to both the enhancement count and the habitual count, assessed his punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. In a single point of error, Appellant complains that the trial court erred in overruling his oral motion to quash the indictment. We affirm.

> The indictment charged that Appellant did: Then and there intentionally and knowingly threaten D.D. Collins with imminent bodily injury and did then and there use a deadly weapon, to-wit: a screwdriver, that in the manner of its use and intended use was capable of causing death and serious bodily injury, and the said D.D. Collins *756was then and there a peace officer in the lawful discharge of his official duty and the said defendant had been informed and knew D.D. Collins was a peace officer.

Prior to trial, Appellant orally moved to quash the indictment. Article 27.10 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides:

> All motions to set aside an indictment or information and all special pleas and exceptions shall be in writing.

Tex.Code Ceim.PROcAnn. art. 27.10 (Vernon 1989).

The requirement that a motion to quash be in writing is mandatory. An oral motion to quash preserves nothing for review. *Faulks v. State,*528 S.W.2d 607, 609 (Tex.Crim.App.1975).

Because there is no proper motion to quash before us, we do not reach the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

1

. The indictment spelled Appellant’s name "La-vell Smith,” but he signed his name "Lavelle Smith” in the notice of appeal. We will spell his name as he signed it in his notice of appeal.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Dan Hyer,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-005-PHX- SMB

ORDER 

(Fifth Request)

The Court having reviewed the Government’s Motion to Continue Sentencing, there 

being no objection, and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. 1038).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the Sentencing from January 25, 2021

to April 5, 2021 at 3:30 p.m., Courtroom 506 in Phoenix, Arizona.

Dated this 13th day of July, 2020.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1039 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 1