alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

Case No. 08-20585

v. Hon. Gerald E. Rosen

PETER HENDRICKSON,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER VACATING

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

At a session of said Court, held in

the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan

on May 17, 2012 

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court

By order dated April 5, 2012, the Court instructed Defendant and his counsel to be

prepared to address a particular issue at a forthcoming resentencing hearing — namely,

“whether Defendant’s offense level and resulting sentencing range under the U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines should reflect a two-level increase under § 3C1.1 of the Guidelines

for conduct that constituted a willful obstruction or attempted obstruction of the

administration of justice.” (4/5/2012 Order at 5.) In accordance with this order,

Defendant and his counsel addressed this issue at a May 15, 2012 resentencing hearing, as

Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS ECF No. 137 filed 05/17/12 PageID.2250 Page 1 of 2
1

As discussed at the May 15 hearing, Defendant’s May 11, 2012 sentencing

memorandum was accompanied by an exhibit that inadvertently disclosed the CM/ECF

username and password of one of Defendant’s attorneys. In response to this discovery, the

password for the attorney’s CM/ECF account has been changed, and the Court has ordered that

the exhibits accompanying Defendant’s sentencing memorandum be placed under seal. 

However, because these exhibits generally are not subject to filing under seal, and because the

concern identified at the May 15 hearing may be remedied through a more limited redaction of

the username and password disclosed on a single page of Exhibit C to Defendant’s May 11, 2012

sentencing memorandum (i.e., the page identified with Bates No. 63), counsel for Defendant is

instructed to re-file the exhibits to the sentencing memorandum with this specific information

redacted. 

2

well as in a sentencing memorandum filed shortly before this hearing.1 Having

considered the arguments of counsel on this issue at the May 15 hearing, and having

reviewed the sentencing memorandum and accompanying materials submitted by

Defendant in connection with this issue, the Court has determined, for the reasons stated

on the record at the May 15 hearing, that a two-level increase under § 3C1.1 of the

Guidelines would not be appropriate. Accordingly, having now addressed and resolved

this matter,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court’s April 5, 2012

order to show cause is VACATED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen 

Chief Judge, United States District Court

Dated: May 17, 2012

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on May 17, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Ruth A. Gunther 

Case Manager

Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS ECF No. 137 filed 05/17/12 PageID.2251 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 908 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 132
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 908

                          [Report No. 111-339]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend the Wild 
  and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in 
 Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2009

   Mr. Cardoza, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend the Wild 
  and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in 
 Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend the Wild 
and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in 
Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 
are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
                                                 House Calendar No. 132

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 908

                          [Report No. 111-339]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2781) to amend the Wild 
  and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the Molalla River in 
 Oregon, as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 17, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### In re the ESTATE OF Hester SCOTT, Deceased. Frank J. MURPHY, Personal Representative for the Estate, Plaintiff, v. David R. SMALLEY, Appellant, and Commercial Union Insurance Company, Respondent.

No. WD 49835.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

April 25, 1995.

David R. Smalley, Kansas City, pro se.

Bernard Balkin, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., FENNER, C.J., and ULRICH, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

David R. Smalley appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment against him. We affirm. Because we do not discern any jurisprudential value of publishing an opin*732ion, we issue this summary order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2 I certify that on this 4th day of October, 2018, I electronically

3 transmitted a PDF version of this document to the Clerk of Court, using the

4 CM/ECF System, for filing and for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to

5 the following CM/ECF registrants listed below.

6 s/ Pamela S. Kralich

7 Pamela S. Kralich

8

CM/ECF Registrants:

9

10 Reginald Jones, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

Peter Kozinets, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

11 Margaret Perlmeter, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov

Kevin Rapp, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov

12 Andrew Stone, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov

13 Paul Cambria, pcambria@lglaw.com

TomBienert, tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

14 Bruce Feder, bf@federlawpa.com

15 Michael Kimerer, mdk@kimerer.com

Stephen Weiss,sweiss@karpweiss.com

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

13

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 331-9 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 1
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON 

U.S. Magistrate Judge: Jacqueline M. 

Rateau Date: May 24, 2019 

USA v. Robert Francis Krebs Case Number: CR-18-00263-001-TUC-JGZ (JR)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Raquel Arellano

Attorney for Defendant: Jorge Leonardo Costales and Gregory Berger, Assistant Federal Public 

Defenders 

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☒ Custody 

 

STATUS HEARING re Competency (continued from 5/7/2019): 

Examination of the Government’s witness, Dr. Cochrane, is continued and completed. 

Defendant declines the opportunity to testify. 

Recess held 10:59 AM to 11:30 AM. 

Government’s exhibit # 8 is admitted over the objection of the defense. 

Exhibit #7 (Krebs Video Interview @ FBI Office on 1/28/2018) played in open court. 

The Court orders a one week transcript. 

The parties shall submit briefings to the Court, no more than 15 pages in length, by no later than 

12:00 PM on 6/7/2019. 

Summations will be heard on 6/10/2019 at 2:00 PM. 

The Court will maintain the exhibits. 

Recorded By Courtsmart

Deputy Clerk Amanda Smith 

Status Hearing: 

1hr 45 min 

Start: 10:02 AM 

Stop: 12:16 PM
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Navajo Nation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Jefferson Sessions, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-08072-PCT-GMS

ORDER 

 Based on Plaintiff’s (second) Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint 

(Doc. 27), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted. Plaintiff shall have until 

the September 24, 2018 in which to complete service on Defendants. No further 

extensions shall be granted absent extenuating circumstances. 

 Dated this 27th day of August, 2018. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 3:18-cv-08072-GMS Document 29 Filed 08/27/18 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 Before the Court is Defendant Andrew Padilla’s Emergency Motion to Stay Seizure 

of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for Immediate Hearing. (Doc. 360) Defendant Padilla 

requests a stay of two seizure warrants directed at funds in the IOLTA accounts of 

Defendants Andrew Padilla and Joye Vaught. (Doc. 360-1 at 2, 6) For good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the relief requested in Defendant Andrew Padilla’s Motion

to Stay Seizure of Attorneys’ Fees and Request for Immediate Hearing (Doc. 360) is 

temporarily granted pending a hearing on the motion which is scheduled for November 

16, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 

before Judge Steven P. Logan; 

/// 

/// 

/// 

/// 

United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 361 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have until 4:00 p.m. PST on

November 13, 2018 to file its Response Brief, and Defendant Padilla shall have until 12:00 

p.m. PST on November 15, 2018 to file his Reply Brief. 

 Dated this 8th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 361 Filed 11/08/18 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31**



**CERTIFICATIONS**



I,Christopher Valloscertify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Gold Lakes Corp.; and



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.





|                       |    |                                                                                                                                                 | 
|---------------------- | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: November 3, 2015 | By | */s/**Christopher Vallos*                                                                                                                       | 
|                       |    | Christopher Vallos                                                                                                                              | 
|                       |    | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN
NO. 03-04-00693- CR
M ic hae l E. M e r r it t, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 50107 , HO NORAB LE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
I n J anuar y 2000, appellant Micha el E. Mer ritt ple aded g uilty

to possessing more than one g ram of c ocaine
. See Te x. He a lth& Sa fet y Cod e Ann. § 4 81 .1 15 (We st 2 00 3) . H e a lso
a dmi tt ed h avi ng tw o p revi ou s fe lo ny con vi cti on s. Th e cou rtdefe rredadj ud ica tion a nd pla c e d M e rritt
on community supervision. I n September 2004, the court a djudicated Me rritt g uilty afte r a he aring
on the State ’s mot ion

and se nte nc e d h im t o tw e nty -f ive y e ars ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Merr itt’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. The brief m eets the r equire ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by pres ent inga

pr of e ssi on a l e va luatio n o f t

he re c or d d e mon str a tin g wh y the re are no argua

ble g rounds to be adva

nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 488 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tat e , 573 S.W .2d 80 7 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tat e , 516 S.W. 2d 68 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); Jack son v. Sta te , 485 S.W. 2d 55 3 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tat e , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.2

1969). Mer

ritt rece ived a c opy

of c o u n s el ’s b ri ef a

nd was a dvised of his rig ht to ex amine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re c o r d and counse l’s brief a

nd ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the r ecor d that might arguably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

____________________

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________________ Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces B . A. Smith and Pemberton Affir med Filed: June 16, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:08-cv-14896-PDB-DAS Document 1 Filed 11/21/2008 Page 16 of 16
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 968 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 968

 Expressing sympathy for and solidarity with the people of the Russian 
        Federation following the bombing of the Nevsky Express.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2009

 Mr. Hastings of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing sympathy for and solidarity with the people of the Russian 
        Federation following the bombing of the Nevsky Express.

Whereas on the night of November 27, 2009, a bomb exploded on the railroad 
        tracks derailing the Nevsky Express, a passenger train traveling from 
        Moscow to St. Petersburg, Russia;
Whereas more than 25 people were killed and scores more wounded in this 
        terrorist attack;
Whereas the attack on the Nevsky Express was the worst terrorist attack in 
        Russia in years, outside the volatile North Caucasus;
Whereas such acts of violence against civilian targets are clearly intended to 
        spread fear across all levels of society and thus injure, at least 
        psychologically, a far greater number of people than those physically 
        present at the scene of the attack; and
Whereas the United States and many other nations have also experienced such acts 
        of terrorism: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses sympathy for and solidarity with the people 
        of the Russian Federation following the bombing of the Nevsky 
        Express;
            (2) condemns all acts of terrorism wherever they may occur 
        and against whomever they may be directed; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 
        transmit a copy of this resolution to the Ambassador of the 
        Russian Federation to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Terry E. KITCHEN, Appellant.

Nos. WD 40975, WD 42179.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 1, 1990.

John A. Klosterman, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before TURNAGE, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from conviction of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1986, and *908sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment as a persistent offender. Also an appeal from denial of relief under Rule 29.15.

Judgments affirmed. Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).
Compensation Arrangements for the Named Executive Officers



 EXHIBIT 10 (m) 
 COMPUTER TASK GROUP, INCORPORATED 
 COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 

 Set forth below is a summary of the annual and incentive compensation paid by Computer Task Group, Incorporated (the Company) to its named executives
(defined in Regulation S-K Item 402(a)(3)) in their current positions as of the date of the filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. All of the Company’s executive officers are
at-will employees whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors, subject only to the terms of employment agreements, as applicable, between the Company and these
executive officers. 
 Effective January 1, 2009, the named executive officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries in their
current positions: 
  

				
	 	  	Current
Annual
Salary
		
	 James R. Boldt
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	450,000
		
	 Brendan M. Harrington
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	237,000
		
	 Michael J. Colson
Senior Vice President, Solutions
	  	$	246,000
		
	 Filip J.L. Gyde (1)
Senior Vice President, General Manager, CTG Europe
	  	$	300,511
		
	 Thomas J. Niehaus
Senior Vice President and General Manager, CTG HealthCare Solutions
	  	$	243,000

 Executive officers are also eligible to receive incentive compensation each year primarily based upon the
achievement of certain targets. These targets may include specific levels of revenue growth, gross profit, operating income or earnings per share. Bonuses were awarded to the named executives for 2008 as follows: 
  

				
	 	  	2008
Bonus
		
	 James R. Boldt
	  	$	666,053
		
	 Brendan M. Harrington
	  	$	170,466
		
	 Michael J. Colson
	  	$	308,515
		
	 Filip J.L. Gyde
	  	$	126,184
		
	 Thomas J. Niehaus
	  	$	180,769


	 	



	 	(1)	Mr. Gyde is paid in Euros. This amount represents his base pay of 213,174 Euros translated into U.S. dollars at the January 1, 2009 exchange rate.


  

 68
Amendment to Amended  and Restated Change of Control



 Exhibit 10.35 
 AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT, dated December 23, 2008, is by and between CIRCOR, INC., a
Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”), and Andrew William Higgins (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive entered into an amended and restated executive change in control agreement made as of May 6, 2008 (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to comply with and meet the requirements of the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, do mutually covenant and agree as follows: 
 1. Section 3(b)(i)(B) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the second sentence of such subsection in its entirety and replacing it with the
following: 
 “To the extent that there is more than one method of reducing the payments to bring them within the Threshold Amount, the
Severance Payments shall be reduced in the following order: (1) cash payments not subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the ‘Code’); (2) cash payments subject to Section 409A of the
Code; (3) equity-based payments; and (4) non-cash form of benefits. To the extent any payment is to be made over time (e.g., in installments), then the payments shall be reduced in reverse chronological order.” 
 2. The Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect as to all other provisions under said Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	CIRCOR, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Frederic M. Burditt

	Name:	 	Frederic M. Burditt
	Title:	 	VP, Treasurer
	
	 /s/ Andrew William Higgins

	Andrew William Higgins