alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 107 (Monday, June 3, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27873-27874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13789]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Renewal Application Designated for Hearing

    1. The Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, has before him the 
following application for renewal of broadcast license:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       MM Docket
                 Licensee                           City/state                     File No.               No.   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WPVG, Inc................................  Funkstown, Maryland........  BR-950601VH                       96-117
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Seeking renewal of the license for WPVG(AM))
    2. Pursuant to Section 309(e) of the Communications Act of 1934, as 
amended, the above application has been designated for hearing in a 
proceeding upon the following issues:
    (a) To determine whether WPVG, Inc. has the capability and intent 
to expeditiously resume the broadcast operations of WPVG(AM), 
consistent with the Commission's Rules.
    (b) To determine whether WPVG, Inc. has violated Sections 73.1740 
and/or 73.1750 of the Commission's Rules.
    (c) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the 
foregoing issues, whether grant of the subject renewal of license 
application would service the public interest, convenience and 
necessity.
    A copy of the complete HDO in this proceeding is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the dockets 
section of the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. The complete text may also be purchased from the 
Commission's duplicating

[[Page 27874]]

contractor, International Transcription Service, 2100 M Street, N.W., 
Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037 (telephone 202-857-3800).

Federal Communications Commission.
Stuart B. Bedell,
Assistant Chief, Audio Services Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-13789 Filed 5-31-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7606

ALONZO TURNER-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-748-JFM) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Alonzo Turner-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alonzo Turner-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner-Bey v. Corcoran , No. CA98-748-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>    THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
            EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE
            PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
            BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1000

<S>                                      <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<CASH>                                         3,181
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 30,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                     597
<INVENTORY>                                   31,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              77,432
<PP&E>                                        78,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                42,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               123,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         39,495
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       3,731
<OTHER-SE>                                    42,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 123,360
<SALES>                                      159,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             159,403
<CGS>                                        111,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                111,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              36,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                8,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  326
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,013
<EPS-BASIC>                                  $0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $0.69


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned officers of Vignette Corporation (the Company) hereby certify that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: March 12, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ THOMAS E. HOGAN                  
|                                     
|Thomas E. Hogan                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ CHARLES W. SANSBURY
|                       
|Charles W. Sansbury    
|Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Desiree Lerma,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-50047-01-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER

On September 18, 2020, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. A detention hearing was held. The Court considered the 

information provided to the Court and the arguments of counsel in determining whether 

Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke her supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

she is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 18th day of September, 2020.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-50047-JJT Document 13 Filed 09/18/20 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. CAMBRIA, JR. (NY 15873, admitted pro hac vice) 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

pcambria@lglaw.com 

ERIN. E. MCCAMPBELL (NY 4480166, admitted pro hac vice) 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

emccampbell@lglaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR FILING MICHAEL 

LACEY’S REPLY TO RULE 29 

 

 Erin McCampbell Paris hereby moves for an extension of its deadline to reply in 

support to Michael Lacey’s Rule 29 motion. The current deadline is January 16, 2024. 

Mrs. Paris requests that the Court extend the reply deadline by 2 days, to January 18, 

2024. Mrs. Paris makes this request because I am currently home ill and unable to finish 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2028 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

preparing the Reply. Mrs. Paris has consulted with the assigned AUSAs, who do not 

oppose the requested extension of the response time. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 16th day of January, 2024. 

 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

 By: /s/ Erin McCampbell Paris 

 PAUL J. CAMBRIA, JR. 

 Attorney for Defendant Michael Lacey 

On January, 2019, a PDF version 

of this document was filed with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF 

System for filing and for Transmittal 

Of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the 

Following CM/ECF registrants: 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2028 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kevin Rapp, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov 

Reginald Jones, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov 

Peter Kozinets, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov 

John Kucera, john.kucera@usdoj.gov 

Margaret Perlmeter, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

Patrick Reid, Patrick.Reid@usdoj.gov 

Andrew Stone, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov 

Amanda Wick, Amanda.Wick@usdoj.gov 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2028 Filed 01/16/24 Page 3 of 3
**OCCICC Of**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

? . ? 

# h

t malmumn, at 

### er on the aourt



### to nc, es aounty auditor, 

### t!mt **lblp** 

### be mirm quertion whether rrl.caerr’

court oould le@ally BOllt.r~Ot

6 d8bt t0 b8 **liTUidllt8d** Ollt**Of** 

### MtiaIpatti revenue8 or a subrequent fear arid f reque6tod Cat 

### they withhold aonrmation of this trM88OtiOn, panding le,lal **EdVi8e** ir0:~.

the 

### County Judge on the pint. The enaloeed letter from the Oounty Jiadm of MoLennaaCounty, nddre88ad to M, resulted..

Honorablr ¶Wn A. Craven, 

### Paga 8



### 'I 8h~ll

thaak you to adrirr

me ihethrr 01!BOt 4 CweiO#lm8' &rPrt OM ~Oh48. road maohlwry for one peain&, jwlng a 

### part 

### of muohpurahe8e 

### priae outof 194lremllUe8 and iUW lntorert bra&q varrant or



### t or 

### balaaoo

ot purahampirio* of Road and &i&a8 rulldrwe

### nuu for 

### lOti."
73 Tha lottor fromHonorable

D. T.HoDanlol,

County
r 

### ,uyelte you, uhiah wa8 enoloud with your inwiry,



### 'lu you know, the Comml8~foner8' Ogurt oi thlr oounty d88ire8,tO purohare oertaln 

## r cd l qui&mmt

and~~ohlamy for oaeot tho r 

### ainotr

in thoOounty, 

### but.ruoh preoinot 008not 

### have8uirioi43t avallabl8 

### fund8duriXl$ thefW 1941to a- On the n808S8tlI'$' **work** in nroh proolnot e+ fully par for the **equipmnt** 

### uhloh the Court oontsm 

### late8 Suah 8itUIItion r4i8.8 the 

### roll olr! b$- ng quest on, to-wit I wVan Comml88loner8* 

### Oouitpurohase r&d maahlnery for me preolnot, 

### lng a part of suoh purohase prloe out of 1 41 raYonue8 

### nnd B”p 

### lrrue lntere8t beurlm mrrmt or note for mnt of b:ilanae OS 

### puroharroprioe to be 

### paiBayout et Road tml Rrldee fund 

### revewesfor 194R?t

“In aonnectlon 

### with thla 

### question I cdl your attention to Artlole 11, Sectloh 7, o? the Texae Constitution, and alec call your attention to the iollowin~ case8 w!-Aoh apparmtly bear on the subject, as 

### r0ii0w: "Clt? of Tezsll v8. DessaJnt.,9 Z.Y:. 3S?; Plc:Ilel

vs. City of iyr-co53 5.X. 332; Lesatcr vs. Lopez, 201 A.?;.1041; and, **Case** or Tras?!nC.

k!aoklneC0mpar.y

vs. Camp CO‘Anty,**23-E 5:;;.**  **1.**

**- “**  **By reassn**  cf the r l:n& in 5% c53es a'3ovc cited as wall as Ar:,:ole 11, Sectkm '?!of the Texas Constitution, there is rreat douot tn A~Xonorablo Tom A. Craton, 

### Pam S

. mind 

### that the Oomml88ioner8* Court oan oblluate future revenuo8 fGr tho paymat of a prermt **obli&atiGn** 

### in the manner aontecnplated; however, 1 feel that t'cf8 

### aatter should 

### be subdttd to thm 

### Attoraoy Oonerel for an opinion and 

### I will 

## l pprooiak it if mu will **do 80.**  **” ?h#**  **ObO-** 8t4ted **QW8tiOIl 18**  **aamruwd la**  

### tho **efflrm-**



### ‘hwtiag that thr foregoing fully (LMer8 your inquiry, wa are

i **Your8** 

### very truly ATTORNEYG-AL 

### OF ‘XXB
Sunoco Partners LLC Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet for 2009



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 Sunoco Partners LLC 
 Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
 for 2009 
  
 Directors who are employees of Sunoco Partners LLC or its affiliates receive
no additional compensation for service on the general partner’s board of directors or any committees of the board. The table below summarizes the 2009 compensation program for independent directors of Sunoco Partners LLC. 
  
 2009 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY 
  

							
	 Component
	  	Amount
($)	  	Medium of Payment	  	Timing of Payment
	 Annual Retainer
	  	41,000 per year	  	Restricted Units	  	$10,250 credited quarterly1
		  	41,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$10,250 paid quarterly
	 Board Meeting Fee
	  	1,500 per meeting	  	Cash	  	Paid quarterly
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	1,000 per meeting	  	Cash	  	Paid quarterly
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer
	  	3,500 per year	  	Cash	  	$ 875 paid quarterly
	 Audit/Conflicts Committee Chair Retainer
	  	8,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$2,000 paid quarterly

  
 Note to table: 
  

	(1)	The fair market value of each quarterly payment of Restricted Units is calculated as of the payment date. The portion of the annual retainer paid in the form of Restricted Units is
required to be deferred, and is credited to each independent director’s account in the Sunoco Partners LLC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. 

  

 In addition to the foregoing, each independent director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of
the board of directors or committees.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

d0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147698

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147698

COA: 312679

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034982

- FH

ROBERT WILLIAM WHYTE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 2, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appe aring to this Court that the case of

People v Earl (Docket No. 145677) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to

appeal, we ORDER that the application be he ld in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

that case.
CX2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

2007 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB

EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION

-------------

I, Adam Reiser, Chief Executive Officer of CX2 Technologies., Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CX2 Technologies., Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer 's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.



Dated: December 12, 2007



/s/ Adam Reiser

____________________________________________

Adam Reiser

Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Executive,

Financial and Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15009]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Institute of Corrections


Advisory Board Meeting

    Time and Date: 12:30 p.m., Monday, June 24, 1996.
    Place: Ramada Inn, 1117 Williston Road, Burlington, Vermont.
    Status: Open.
    Matters To Be Considered: Update on the reimbursement plan for NIC 
services, Office of Justice Programs' update on the Violent Offender 
and Truth In Sentencing Grant Program, update on the District of 
Columbia Department of Corrections Study, progress report from the task 
force on prison construction standardization and techniques, update on 
the NIC Executive Excellence Program, status of the final report on the 
mental health in jails survey, status report on the positional asphyxia 
video proposal, and the FY 1997 program plan recommendations.
    Contact Person for More Information: Larry Solomon, Deputy 
Director, (202) 307-3106, ext. 155.
Morris L. Thigpen,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 96-15009 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-36-M
AGREEMENT


Exhibit 10.4




AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.

AND

ROBERT GEORGE




Whereas, Robert George has provided Executive and Consulting Services to INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. (“Corporation”) for the period from February 20, 2008 to date, expending over 1500 hours of his time, assuming the responsibilities and office of a Director of the Corporation, for which time and services he has not been compensated; and




Whereas, as a result in part of his activities and efforts, the Corporation has been changed from an insolvent shell without assets, operations or prospects, into a Corporation with new plans and business purpose for an exciting Computer Technology and Equipment Manufacturer and Distribution Business; and




Whereas, at this date, the Corporation has no funds to pay in cash the compensation rightly due for these services fully rendered, and has only restricted stock which it might use to satisfy this debt;




Now, Therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of this 20th day of  February, 2009:




1.  Corporation hereby contracts to issue 5,000,000 shares of its Restricted Common Stock to Robert George, and Robert George hereby accepts said shares, in full satisfaction of the compensation owed to Robert George by Corporation for the consulting services and Director services fully provided by Robert George to Corporation over the twelve month period ending February 20, 2009.




2.  The parties hereto further agree that since Corporation is in the process of amending its Articles of Incorporation to increase its authorized capital stock so that it can lawfully issue additional shares, and Corporation can not issue shares until said amendment is complete, that Corporation shall immediately amend its Articles to permit it to issue the shares provided for by this Agreement, and the parties further agree that by their execution of this Agreement, Corporation is bound to issue the aforesaid shares in full, as soon as its Articles are amended, and the shares so to be issued shall be deemed fully earned and vested as of the date of execution of this Agreement by the Parties hereto.







INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.




BY:  /s/RICHARD DAMION

            RICHARD DAMION, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER








       /s/  ROBERT GEORGE

            ROBERT GEORGE