alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 14, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00623

- CR

Billy Ray MONREAL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 04

- 11496

- CR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubo se, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State’s third motion for extension of time to file its brief is granted. The State’s brief

is due on August 9, 2017

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affix ed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of July, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 240 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 240 Filed 07/30/18 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. (NY 15873, admitted pro hac vice)

pcambria@lglaw.com

Erin E. McCampbell (NY 4480166, admitted pro hac vice)

emccampbell@lglaw.com

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120

Buffalo, New York 14202

Telephone: (716) 849-1333

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580

Attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

DEFENDANT LACEY’S JOINDER IN 

DEFENDANT ANDREW PADILLA’S 

MOTION FOR ITEMIZATION OF 

BRADY/GIGLIO MATERIAL

Defendant Michael Lacey hereby joins in the Motion for Itemization of Brady/Giglio

Materialfiles by Defendant Andrew Padilla on August 20, 2018 (the “Motion”). (See Dkt. 273.) 

By this joinder, Mr. Lacey adopts the positions set forth in the Motion as fully set forth herein. 

The issues raised in the Motion apply with equal force to Mr. Lacey. 

Dated: August 22, 2018 LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP

/s/ Erin E. McCampbell

Attorneys for Defendant

Michael Lacey

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 278 Filed 08/22/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 22th day of August 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF 

version of this document to the Clerk of the Court by filing with the CM/ECF system and 

understand a copy of the filing will be emailed to the attorneys of record.

By: /s/ April Kelly

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 278 Filed 08/22/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 112 (Monday, June 10, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29311-29312]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14618]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 90-66, RM-7139, RM-7368, RM-7369]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lincoln, Osage Beach, Steelville and 
Warsaw, MO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document denies the petition for reconsideration filed by 
Twenty One Sound Communications, Inc., licensee of Station KNSX(FM), 
Steelville, Missouri of our Report and Order, 57 FR 21040 (May 18, 
1992) substituting Channel 228C3 for Channel 228A at Osage Beach, 
Missouri and modified the license of Station KYLC, Osage Beach, 
Missouri, to specify the higher class channel. The Commission affirmed 
the dismissal of Twenty One's counterproposal for failure to verify 
pursuant to Section 1.52 of the Commission's Rules. With this action, 
this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 1996.


[[Page 29312]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arthur D. Scrutchins, Mass Media 
Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Memorandum Opinion and Order, MM Docket No. 90-66, adopted May 9, 1996 
and released June 4, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Service, 
Inc. (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 
20037.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Douglas W. Webbink,
Chief, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-14618 Filed 6-7-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

Before the Court are the United States’ Motion to Unseal for a Limited Purpose 

(Doc. 1381) and Defendant Larkin’s Motion to Unseal May 3, 2021 Proceeding for 

Limited Purpose (Doc. 1383). Finding good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motions (Docs. 1381 and 1383).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED unsealing the transcript of the proceeding held on 

May 3, 2021 for the purpose of transcription and release of the transcript to the United 

States and Defendant Larkin. The transcript shall otherwise remain under seal until 

further Order of this Court.

The Court finds there is no excludable delay.

Dated this 9th day of November, 2021.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1385 Filed 11/10/21 Page 1 of 1
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 164

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

EX PARTE MAUREEN MARTINEZ

On appeal from the 156 th District C ourt

o f Bee C ounty, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant Maureen Martinez filed a notice of appeal from an order denying her

application for writ of habeas corpus. On August 12, 2022, we abated the appeal and

remanded the case to the trial court to resolve a conflict between the record and the trial

court ’ s certification of Martinez ’ s right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2). However,

on August 22, 2022, Martinez filed a motion to dismiss the appeal . The motion was filed

before we reached a decision in the case, and the motion was signed by both Martinez

and her attorney. See id. R. 42.2 (a)

. Accordingly, w e reinstate the appeal, grant2

Martinez ’ s motion to dismiss , and dismiss the appeal. See id. Having dismissed the

appeal at Martinez ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained

.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2 ( b ).

Delivered and filed on the

22nd day of September , 202 2

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0548 CITY OF KALISPELL,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NATHAN RAY WARNER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender D ivision’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 12 2023

12/12/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0548
#### Donald Gene SPAIN, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 16158.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.

Sept. 28, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Oct. 18, 1989.

Application to Transfer Denied Nov. 14, 1989.

Donald L. Clough, Springfield, for mov-ant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Daryl R. Hylton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

GREENE, Judge.

Donald Gene Spain appeals from the motion court’s order, after evidentiary hearing, overruling his Rule 27.261 motion to vacate his conviction on two charges of selling a controlled substance (cocaine), following his guilty pleas to the charges and ensuing 16-year concurrent sentences.

The only ground preserved for appellate review is Spain’s contention that his guilty pleas were involuntary because his trial counsel did not tell him that he would have to wait at least five years after incarceration before he could apply for parole. Following the evidentiary hearing, the motion court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, which included the conclusion that the guilty pleas made by Spain were freely and voluntarily given. Our review is limited to a determination of whether those findings and conclusions were clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).

*846We have read the transcript of the evi-dentiary hearing and the record furnished to us concerning Spain’s pleas of guilty to the charges in question. His pleas of guilty were unequivocal and were made with full knowledge that he would receive 16-year concurrent sentences on the two charges. There is nothing in the record to show that his attorney told him anything that would lead Spain to believe that his prison term would be shortened by early parole from his 16-year sentences.

Spain’s ill founded hope, if true, that he would be entitled to a parole hearing on the 16-year sentences earlier than he would have received on 20-year sentences under an earlier plea bargain proposal from the prosecutor, which Spain rejected, did not invalidate the guilty pleas that he freely and voluntarily made. *Oldham v. State,*740 S.W.2d 213, 214 (Mo.App.1987); *Slankard v. State,*525 S.W.2d 101, 102 (Mo. App.1975).

The motion court’s findings, conclusions, and order denying relief were not clearly erroneous, and are affirmed.

HOLSTEIN, C.J., and CROW, P.J., concur.

1

. In its findings, conclusions, and order denying relief, the motion court recited that the proceeding to vacate Spain’s sentences was brought under Supreme Court Rule 24.035. This was incorrect, as Rule 24.035 did not become effective until January 1, 1988. Page 131, Missouri Rules of Court (20th ed.1989). This proceeding continues to be governed by former Rule 27.26, repealed January 1, 1988, as the motion to vacate in this case was filed November 24, 1987, and Rule 27.26 was in full force and effect at that time. However, the same standard of review is mandated under both rules, which are Rule 27.26© and Rule 24.035©.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2015

No. 04-14-00745-CV

Keeann DEVORA, Craig Owen, and Keller Williams Realty,

Appellants

v.

Tavaris J. SLAUGHTER, Individually, and TJ Slaughter Enterprises, LLC,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-13013

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellant’s brief is due on February 6, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1 CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT CARL 

FERRER’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jonathan M. Baum (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 

One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower Ste 1070 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Tel: (415) 365-6700 

Fax: (415) 365-6700 

jbaum@steptoe.com 

Tahir L. Boykins ((Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 

633 W. Fifth St., Ste. 1900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Tel: (213) 439-9400 

Fax: (213) 439-9599 

tboykins@steptoe.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CARL FERRER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN 

BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT 

CARL FERRER’S MOTION FOR A 

PROTECTIVE ORDER 

 

[Filed concurrently herewith Movant Carl 

Ferrer’s Motion for A Protective Order]

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1826 Filed 10/03/23 Page 1 of 3
2 CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT CARL 

FERRER’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I, Jonathan M. Baum, hereby declare: 

1. I am a partner with Steptoe & Johnson LLP, counsel for 

Movant Carl Ferrer in this action. I have personal knowledge of the facts contained 

herein and, if called, I could testify competently to them. 

2. James Grant of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP served as Mr. Ferrer’s 

personal counsel in the criminal case filed against him in Sacramento County, California. 

Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and accurate copy of the title page of a Sacramento 

Superior Court Criminal Pleading where Grant is identified as “Counsel for Defendants 

Carl Ferrer, Michael Lacey and James Larkin.” 

 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America 

that the foregoing is true and correct. 

Executed in Washington, D.C. on October 3, 2023. 

 

/s/ Jonathan M. Baum 

Jonathan M. Baum 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1826 Filed 10/03/23 Page 2 of 3
3 CASE NO. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH 

DECLARATION OF JONATHAN BAUM IN SUPPORT OF MOVANT CARL 

FERRER’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 3, 2023, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record. 

 /s/ Debbie DeRivero 

 Debbie DeRivero 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1826 Filed 10/03/23 Page 3 of 3
Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Joye Vaught,

Defendant.

 CR-2018-0422-SMB

NOTICE OF JOINDER WITH 

MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF DOC. 

746)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Defendant, Joye Vaught, hereby joins her 

codefendants in their Motion to Dismiss, filed September 27, 2019, listed as ECF 

Doc. 746 on the public docket. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on October 19, 2019.

s/Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand

Attorney for Defendant

Joy Bertrand, Esq.

PO Box 2734

Scottsdale, Arizona 85252-2734

Telephone: 480-656-3919

Fax: 480-361-4694

joyous@mailbag.com

www.joybertrandlaw.com

Arizona State Bar No. 024181

ATTORNEY FOR: DEFENDANT

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 787 Filed 10/19/19 Page 1 of 2
Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On October 19, 2019, I, Joy Bertrand, attorney for the Defendant, Joye 

Vaught, filed the foregoing with the Arizona District Court’s electronic filing 

system. Based on my training and experience with electronic filing in the federal 

courts, it is my understanding that a copy of this request will be electronically 

served upon opposing counsel and codefendant counsel upon its submission to 

the Court.

Respectfully submitted this Nineteenth day of October, 2019.

s/Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 787 Filed 10/19/19 Page 2 of 2
A d mi nistrati ve Office of t he U nite d States C o urts F O R C O U R T U S E O N L Y

T R A N S C RI P T O R D E R D U E D A T E:

A O 4 3 5

A Z F or m ( Re v. 1 0 / 2 0 1 8

1. N A M E 2. P H O N E N U M B E R 3. D A T E

4. FI R M N A M E

5. M AI LI N G A D D R E S S 6. CI T Y 7. S T A T E 8. ZI P C O D E

9. C A S E N U M B E R 1 0. J U D G E D A T E S O F P R O C E E DI N G S

1 1. 1 2. 

1 3. C A S E N A M E L O C A TI O N O F P R O C E E DI N G S

1 4. 1 5. S T A T E

1 6. O R D E R F O R

 

C RI MI N A L A P P E A L

 

N O N- A P P E A L 

CI VI L

 

C RI MI N A L J U S TI C E A C T 

 

I N F O R M A P A U P E RI S

B A N K R U P T C Y

O T H E R ( S pecif y)

1 7. T R A N S C RI P T R E Q U E S T E D ( S pecif y p orti o n(s) a n d date(s) of pr ocee di n g(s) f or w hic h tra nscri pt is re q ueste d.)

P O R TI O N S D A T E( S) P O R TI O N( S) D A T E( S)

T E S TI M O N Y ( S pecif y

P R E- T RI A L P R O C E E DI N G

O T H E R ( S pecif y)

V OI R DI R E

O P E NI N G S T A T E M E N T ( Plai ntiff) 

O P E NI N G S T A T E M E N T ( Defe n da nt)

C L O SI N G A R G U M E N T ( Plai ntiff)

C L O SI N G A R G U M E N T ( Defe n da nt) 

O PI NI O N O F C O U R T

J U R Y I N S T R U C TI O N S

S E N T E N CI N G

B AI L H E A RI N G

1 8. O R D E R

C A T E G O R Y

O RI GI N A L + 1

( ori gi nal t o C o urt,

c o p y t o or deri n g part y)

FI R S T

C O P Y

# O F

A D DI TI O N A L

C O PI E S

D E LI V E R Y I N S T R U C TI O N S 

( C hec k all t hat a p pl y.)

E S TI M A T E D C O S T S

3 0 D A Y S P A P E R C O P Y

P D F (e- mail)

A S CII (e- mail)

1 4 D A Y S

7 D A Y S(e x pe dite d)

D AI L Y

H O U R L Y

R E A L TI M E E- M AI L A D D R E S S

N O T E: I F O R D E RI N G M O R E T H A N O N E F O R M A T, 

T H E R E WI L L B E A N A D DI TI O N A L C H A R G E.

1 9. SI G N A T U R E

2 0. D A T E

T R A N S C RI P T T O B E P R E P A R E D B Y

E S TI M A T E T O T A L

P R O C E S S E D B Y P H O N E N U M B E R O R D E R R E C EI V E D D A T E B Y

D E P O SI T P AI D D E P O SI T P AI D

T R A N S C RI P T O R D E R E D T O T A L C H A R G E S

T R A N S C RI P T R E C EI V E D L E S S D E P O SI T

O R D E RI N G P A R T Y N O TI FI E D

T O PI C K U P T R A N S C RI P T T O T A L R E F U N D E D

P A R T Y R E C EI V E D T R A N S C RI P T T O T A L D U E

DI S T RI B U TI O N: C O U R T C O P Y T R A N S C RI P TI O N C O P Y O R D E R R E C EI P T O R D E R C O P Y

3 D A Y S

C E R TI FI C A TI O N ( 1 9. & 2 0.) B y si g ni n g bel o w, I certif y t hat I will pa y all c har ges

( de p osit pl us a d diti o nal).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1441 Filed 12/20/21 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTHWEST CHARIOTS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Doolan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: September 12, 2007

By: /s/ Robert Doolan

Robert Doolan - Chief Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
ex10-16.htm


    


      Exhibit
10.16

      


      


      


      SIXTH
AMENDMENT TO THE

      CAMERON
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

      2005
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

      


      


      WHEREAS, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(the “EQIP Plan”); and

      


      WHEREAS, the Company desires
to amend the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan in certain respects;

      


      NOW, THEREFORE, the 2005
Equity Incentive Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of February 18,
2009:

      


      
        	
                1.

              	
                Section
      3.1(a) shall be amended so that the last sentence thereof shall read in
      its entirety:

                 

              
	 
      	
                Any
      Shares that are subject to Awards other than Options or Stock Appreciate
      Rights shall be counted against this limit as one and fifty-nine tenths
      (1.59) Shares for every one (1) Share granted.

                 

              	 
      
	
                2.

              	
                As
      amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and
      reaffirmed.

                 

                 

              


      

      


      


      APPROVED:

      


      /s/ William C. Lemmer

      ______________________________

      William C. Lemmer

      Senior Vice President and General
Counsel

      


      


      Date:  February 18,
2009
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31116-31117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15715]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Meeting Act

Agency Holding the Meeting: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Monday, June 24, 1996.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.


[[Page 31117]]


Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Federal Reserve Bank and Branch director appointments.
    2. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    3. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: June 14, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-15715 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit A

Filed Under Seal

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1281-1 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 1