alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1*



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted),
Stephen Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of Chordiant Software, Inc. (the Company), and Steve G. Vogel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:



1.  The Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In witness whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28thday of March, 2003.



/s/    STEPHEN KELLYStephen Kelly, Chief Executive Officer/s/    STEVE G. VOGELSteve G. Vogel, Chief Financial Officer








---

|* |  | This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which it relates, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Annual Report on Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|** |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chordiant Software, Inc. and will be retained by Chordiant Software, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Eight, Inc., (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of June 30, 2010, and for the period then ended.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/   GLADE
 M. KNIGHT  | 
|                        | 
|Glade M. Knight         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 3,
 2010         | 
|                        | 
|/s/   BRYAN
 PEERY      | 
|                        | 
|Bryan Peery             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 3,
 2010         | 

---
Order entered June 12, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01210 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0121 1 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0121 2 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0121 3 - CR JUAN VELASQUEZ BENIT EZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11 - 53117 - U , F11 - 62850 - U, F12 - 52399 - U & F12 - 5564 - U 

### O RDER We REINSTATE the app e als

. By order entered May 28, 2019, the Court abat ed these appeals to enable the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief had not been filed. On June 10, 2019, appellant requested an extension of time to file his brief and tendered his brief for filing. We VACATE our May 28, 2 019 order

. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2101WA

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Dewaine Summerhill, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western No. 97-2102WA District of Arkansas.

_____________ [UNPUBLISHED] United States of America, * * Appellee, *

* v. * * Robert Patrick Hickey, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: December 9, 1997

Filed: December 17, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.-2- _____________ PER CURIAM. Dew aineSummerhill and Robert Patrick Hickey appeal their fraud-relate d convictions. Summerhill and Hickey contend the district court improperly denied their motions for a continuance to prepare for trial. Additionally, Summerhill raise s contentions related to the district court's refusal to grant Summerhill's motion for a separate trial and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdicts. A review of the record shows the parties' claims are without merit. Because the appeal involves the straightforward application of settled principles of law, a discussion will serve n o useful purpose. We thus affirm the convictions of Summerhill and Hicke y without an extended opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  School4Chauffeurs,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter  ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery
E. Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: April 6, 2010

                                        By: /s/ JEFFERY E. JONES
                                            ___________________________
                                                Jeffery E. Jones
                                                President
```
Exhibit 2 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-2 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-2 Filed 07/20/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-2 Filed 07/20/18 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Wayne C. SLEDD, Respondent.

No. WD 46273.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 9, 1993.

Raymond L. Legg, Columbia, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Rudolph R. Rhodes, IV, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before LOWENSTEIN, C.J., and TURNAGE and BRECKENRIDGE, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from judgment of conviction for possession of crack cocaine, § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1991, and sentence of one year.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Order of the United States District 
Court of New Mexico, dated August 14, 1985, the United States Small 
Business Administration hereby revokes the license of Venture Capital 
Corporation of New Mexico, a New Mexico Corporation, to function as a 
small business investment company under the Small Business Investment 
Company License No. 06/06-0172 issued to Venture Capital Corporation of 
New Mexico on July 30, 1974 and said license is hereby declared null 
and void as of March 4,1996.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 96-16424 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No.  333-85829)  pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1999
Employee Stock  Purchase Plan and the Amended and Restated 1997 Stock  Incentive
Plan of SilverStream  Software,  Inc. of our report dated February 1, 2000, with
respect to the financial statements of SilverStream  Software,  Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Our audits also  included  the  financial  statement  schedule  of  SilverStream
Software,  Inc.  listed in Item 14 (a). This schedule is the  responsibility  of
SilverStream  Software,  Inc.'s management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based upon our audits. In our opinion,  the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects,  the information set
forth therein.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 22, 2000


                                      S-2
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATIONS



I, William Tay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cosway Industries, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 18, 2007



/s/ William Tay

William Tay, President and CEO

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul C. RAMSEY, Appellant.

No. 65208.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Jan. 17, 1995.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SMITH, P.J., and PUDLOWSKI and WHITE, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions for attempted rape, sodomy and two counts of armed criminal action. We affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-72877) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999
Non-Employee Director Option Plan, the International Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-83115) pertaining to the Diffusion Corporation 1995 General Stock Option
Plan, the Diffusion Corporation 1995 Executive Stock Option Plan and the
Diffusion Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-91767) pertaining to the 1999 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-30242) pertaining to the Engine 5, Ltd
1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan, the DataSage, Inc. 1996 Stock & Option
Plan, the DataSage, Inc. 1997 Stock & Option Plan and the Vignette Corporation
1999 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated January 24, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of Vignette Corporation included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Austin, Texas
March 28, 2000
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant. Thomas W. HORNSBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 48899, WD 50576.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 28, 1995.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and SMART, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Thomas W. Hornsby was convicted by a jury of the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and sentenced by the court as a prior offender, §§ 558.016 and 557.036.4, RSMo 1994, to twelve years in prison, to be served consecutively to previous sentences. Mr. Hornsby appeals his conviction and the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion, claiming that the trial court plainly erred in allowing the State to exercise a racially motivated peremptory strike and that the motion court erred in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to file a timely request for change of judge.

The judgment of conviction and the order denying the Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacity indicated below, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Opencell Biodmed, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and   procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: October 20, 2008 /s/ Mislav Pavelic Mislav Pavelic, President (as Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 11, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 29565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14843]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies That are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities or assets of a company that engages either 
directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking 
activity that is listed in Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25) 
or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to 
banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise 
noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for processing, it will 
also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the 
question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 
of the BHC Act, including whether consummation of the proposal can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a hearing 
on this question must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a 
written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, 
identifying specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, 
summarizing the evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and 
indicating how the party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of 
the proposal.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than June 21, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. FBOP Corporation, Oak Park, Illinois; to acquire through its 
subsidiary, Regency Savings Bank, FSB, Naperville, Illinois, Torrance 
Bank, S.S.B., Torrance, California, and thereby engage in operating a 
savings association, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(9) of the Board's 
Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 6, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-14843 Filed 6-10-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERICO ALLEN,

Plaintiff,

v

PATRICIA CARUSO, et al, 

Defendant.

 /

Case No. 08-14252

DISTRICT JUDGE ARTHUR J. TARNOW

MAG. JUDGE VIRGINIA M. MORGAN

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

There having been no objection to Magistrate Judge Morgan’s

Report and Recommendation [Docket #23) filed August 28, 2009,

granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the Court

being fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge Morgan is ADOPTED and Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment is [Docket #14] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint be DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow 

Arthur J. Tarnow

United States District Judge

Dated: September 18, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon

parties/counsel of record on September 18, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary

mail.

s/Catherine A. Pickles 

Judicial Secretary

2:08-cv-14252-AJT-VMM Doc # 24 Filed 09/18/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 254
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00051

- CV

In the Matter of M.E. §

§

§

§ From the County Court at Law

o f Cooke County (JV661

- 13 )

December 23, 2014

Per C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM