Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 121 / Friday, June 21, 1996 / Notices 31937

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARING AND APPEALS—Continued

[Week of April 22 through April 26, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Do .................... META, Inc., Arlington, Virginia ................ VWA–0006 Request for Hearing under DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. If granted: A hearing under 10 CFR Part

708 would be held on the complaint of Eugene Greer that

reprisals were taken against him by management officials

of META, Inc. as a consequence of his having cooperated

with an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General.

Do .................... Leo Longtin’s Texaco Fairhaven, Vermont.RR321–196 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Texaco Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The February 4, 1992 Dismissal,

Case No. RF321–11058, issued to Leo Longtin’s Texaco

would be rescinded and the firm would receive a refund in

the Texaco refund proceeding.

Do .................... Rocky Flats Field Office Golden, Colorado.VSO–0093 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at the Rocky Flats Field Office would

receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

April 25, 1996 ......... Oakland Operations Office, Oakland,

California.

VSO–0094 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at Oakland Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

April 22, 1996 ......... S. T. Wooten Corp., Wilson, North Carolina.RR272–238 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The January 30, 1996 Decision and

Order, Case No. RF272–95180, issued to S. T. Wooten

Corp. would be modified regarding the firm’s application in

the crude oil refund proceeding.

REFUND APPLICATIONS RECEIVED

[Week of April 22 to April 26, 1996]

Date received Name of refund proceeding/name of refund applicant Case No.

April 22, 1996 thru April 26, 1996 Crude Oil Supplemental Refunds .......................................................... RK272–3493 thru RK272–3516.

[FR Doc. 96–15870 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5524–8]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review; National

Emission Standards for Asbestos OMB

No. 2060–0101 EPA No. 0111.08

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507(a)(1)(D)), this notice announces

that the Information Collection Request

(ICR) for Petroleum Refineries described

below has been forwarded to the Office

of Management and Budget (OMB) for

review and comment. The ICR describes

the nature of the information collection

and its expected burden and cost; where

appropriate, it includes the actual data

collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before July 22, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY

CALL: Sandy Farmer at EPA, (202) 260–

2740, and refer to EPA ICR No. 0111.08.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title: National Emission Standards for

Asbestos (OMB No. 2060–0101; EPA

ICR No. 0111.08). This is a request for

a revision of a currently approved

collection.

Abstract: Owners or operators of the

affected milling, manufacturing

fabricating, waste disposal, and waste

conversion facilities described must

make the following one-time-only

reports: Notification of the date of

construction or reconstruction;

notification of the anticipated and

actual dates of startup; notification of

any physical or operational change to an

existing facility which may increase the

regulated pollutant emission rate.

Owners or operators are also required to

maintain records of the occurrence and

duration of any startup, shutdown, or

malfunction in the operation of an

affected facility, or any period during

which the monitoring system is

inoperative.

An Agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a collection of information

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The OMB control

numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed

in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter

15. The Federal Register Notice

required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d),

soliciting comments on this collection

of information was published on 3/26/

96 (FR 61, No. 59, p 13186–87).

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 0.25 hours per

response for milling, manufacturing,

and fabricating; 0.75 hours for

demolitions and renovations; and 1.5

hours for waste disposal. Burden means

the total time, effort, or financial

resources expended by persons to

generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or

provide information to or for a Federal

agency. This includes the time needed

to review instructions; develop, acquire,

install, and utilize technology and

systems for the purposes of collecting,

validating, and verifying information,

processing and maintaining

information, and disclosing and

providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements; train personnel to be able

to respond to a collection of

information; search data sources;

complete and review the collection of

information; and transmit or otherwise

disclose the information.
31938 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 121 / Friday, June 21, 1996 / Notices

Milling, Manufacturing, and

Fabricating:

Average Estimated Hours/Response:

0.25.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

430.

Average Frequency of Response: 442.

Estimated Annual Hour Burden:

47,472.

Demolition and Renovation:

Average Estimated Hours/Response:

0.75.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

6,900.

Frequency of Response: 58.

Estimated Annual Hour Burden:

298,483.

Waste Disposal:

Average estimated Hours/Response:

1.5.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

3,017.

Frequency of Response: 18.

Estimated Annual Hour Burden:

82,431.

Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:

428,386 hours.

Estimated Total Annualized Cost

Burden: $0.

Send comments on the Agency’s need

for this information, the accuracy of the

provided burden estimates, and any

suggested methods for minimizing

respondent burden, including through

the use of automated collection

techniques to the following addresses:

(Please refer to EPA ICR No. 0111.08

and OMB Control No. 2060–0101 in any

correspondence.)

Ms. Sandy Farmer, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, OPPE Regulatory

Information Division (2137), 401 M

Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460

and

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and

Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for

EPA, 725 17th Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20503.

Dated: June 14, 1996.

Joseph Retzer,

Director, Regulatory Information Division.

[FR Doc. 96–15889 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[ER–FRL–5470–7]

Environmental Impact Statements and

Regulations; Availability of EPA

Comments

Availability of EPA comments

prepared June 10, 1996 through June 14,

1996 pursuant to the Environmental

Review Process (ERP), under Section

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental

Policy Act as amended. Requests for

copies of EPA comments can be directed

to the Office of Federal Activities at

(202) 564–7167. An explanation of the

ratings assigned to draft environmental

impact statements (EISs) was published

in FR dated April 5, 1996 (61 FR 15251).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D–UAF–K11071–AZ Rating

EC2, Luke Air Force Base, Construction

and Operation of 18-Hole Golf Course,

In a Detention Basin to Prevent Flood

Damage, Dysart Drain Improvement

Project, Maricopa County, AZ.

Summary: EPA expressed

environmental concerns regarding

potential groundwater impacts and

requested that additional information on

this issue be provided.

Final EISs

ERP No. F–AFS–L65252–OR Hoodoo

Master Plan, Plan of Operation

Approval and Special-Use-Permit

Issuance, Willamette National Forest,

McKenzie Ranger District, Linn County,

OR.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–DOE–L06004–WA

Adoption—Disposal of

Decommissioned, Defueled Cruiser,

Ohio Class and Los Angeles Class Naval

Reactor Plants, Site Selection, US

Department of Energy’s Hanford Site,

Benton, Franklin and Grant Counties or

Puget Sound Naval Shipyard,

Bremerton, WA.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to preparing agency.

ERP No. F–DOE–L09808–WA

Plutonium Finishing Plant (PFP)

Stabilization, To Safely Reduced

Radiation Exposure to Workers and

Environment, Hanford Site, Richland,

Benton County, WA.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–DOE–L20002–WA Safe

Interim Storage of Hanford Tank Wastes,

Double Shell Tanks (DSTs) and Cross

Site Transfer System (CSTS)

Construction, Hanford Site, Adams,

Richland, Washington, Benton and

Franklin Counties, WA.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the preferred alternative as described in

the EIS. No formal comment letter was

sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F–SFW–G99006–TX

Balcones Canyonlands Conservation

Plan, Issuance of a Permit to Allow

Incidental Take of Gold-Cheeked

Warbler, Black-capped Vireo and Six

Karst Invertebrates, Travis County, TX.

Summary: EPA had no objection to

the selection of the Fish and Wildlife

Service preferred alternative as

described in the Final EIS.

ERP No. FS–OSM–G01012–NM Fence

Lake Federal Coal Project, Mining Plan,

Permit Application and Federal Permit

Approval or Disapproval, Updated

Information concerning the Salt River

Project Improvement and Power

District’s (SRP) Proposed Fence Lake

Mine, Apache County, AZ and Catron

and Cibola Counties, NM.

Summary: Review of the Final EIS has

been completed and the project found to

be satisfactory. No formal comment

letter was sent to the preparing agency.

Dated: June 18, 1996.

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office

of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 96–15929 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–U

[ER–FRL–5470–6]

Environmental Impact Statements;

Notice of Availability Responsible

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal

Activities, General Information (202)

564–7167 OR (202) 564–7153.

Weekly receipt of Environmental

Impact Statements Filed June 10, 1996

Through June 14, 1996 Pursuant to 40

CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 960271, FINAL SUPPLEMENT,

COE, NC, Wilmington Harbor Channel

Widening and Navigation

Improvement, Updated Information,

Cape Fear River, Port of Wilmington,

New Hanover and Brunswick

Counties, NC, Due: July 22, 1996,

Contact: Hugh Heine (910) 251–4070.

EIS No. 960272, DRAFT EIS, BLM, AK,

Denali National Park and Reserve,

‘‘Frontcountry’’ Entrance Area and

Road Corridor, Development Concept

Plan, AK, Due: August 19, 1996,

Contact: Mike Tranel (907) 683–9552.

EIS No. 960273, DRAFT EIS, DOI, UT,

Wasatch County Water Efficiency

Project and Daniel Replacement

Pipeline Project, Implementation,

Wasatch County, UT, Due: August 13,

1996, Contact: Karen Ricks (801) 226–

7126.

The U.S. Department of the Interior is

a Joint Lead Agency for the above

Project along with the Utah Reclamation

Mitigation and Conservation

Commission (URC).

EIS No. 960274, FINAL EIS, BLM, WY,

Moxa Arch Area Natural Gas

Development Expansion Project,