alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO.03-14-00561-CV 

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 

DANA DUTSCHMANN and KEVIN BIERWIRTH 

Appellant 

v. 

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTAGE ASSOCIATION 

Appellee. 

APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING 

APPELLANT'S BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: 

Dana Dutschmann, Appellant, moves this Court to grant an extension of 

time to file Appellant's Brief, and respectfully states: 

1. Appellant's Briefwas extended by the court to March 19,2015. 

2. Appellant seeks an extension of time to March 19, 2015 in order to file 

Appellant's Brief .. 

4. This extension of time is necessary because Appellant, required 

additional time to research and finalize her brief. 

5. This is the first extension of time Appellant has sought for the filing 

his brief. 

F or these reasons, Dana Dutschmann requests that this court render an order 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00561-CV

4681460

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/27/2015 5:00:33 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/27/2015 5:00:33 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Dana Dutschmann 

13276 Research Blvd. Ste. 204 

Austin, Texas 78750 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

On March 27, 2015, an attempt was made to confer with Douglas Dent, 

attorney for the Appellee, in order to confer as to the extension but Dutschmann 

was unable to reach Mr. Dent. 

Dana 

.siL. 

Dutschmann &a/hM~~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

On March 27,2015, a copy of the attached motion for extension of time was 

sent by U. S. Postal Service to: 

Douglas G. Dent 

6836 Bee Caves Road, Bldg. 3, Suite 303 J h 

Austin, TX 78746 .~v'<, ~7"F(*,
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.F., a child, * From the 326th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 7697-CX.

No. 11-16-00096-CV * September 30, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 876 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 125
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 876

                          [Report No. 111-318]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2996) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 28, 2009

  Mr. Hastings of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2996) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2996) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, 
environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2010, and for other purposes. The conference report shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the conference report to its adoption 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one 
motion to recommit if applicable.
                                                 House Calendar No. 125

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 876

                          [Report No. 111-318]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 2996) making appropriations for the Department of the 
Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
              September 30, 2010, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 28, 2009

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### Timothy LIBERTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, ex rel. Janet E. PACE, Respondent.

No. WD 49904.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 28, 1995.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 2, 1995.

R. Brian Hall, Gladstone, for appellant.

Ronald D. Pridgin, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, C.J., P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and BERREY, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from order denying Petition for Review of the Administrative Hearing Officer’s decision upholding the Director of the Missouri Division of Child Support Enforcement order.

Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
KENDRA PRIESTER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3633

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 5, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James H. Daniel, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROWE, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS   Document 24-1   Filed 05/24/18   Page 1 of 4

Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS   Document 24-1   Filed 05/24/18   Page 2 of 4

Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS   Document 24-1   Filed 05/24/18   Page 3 of 4

Case 2:18-cv-00470-GMS   Document 24-1   Filed 05/24/18   Page 4 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Scott Spear, et al., 

 

Defendants.

Case No. CR18-00422-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 

THE COURT, upon review of the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Motions 

Deadlines, and good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties’ Joint Motion to Extend 

Motions Deadlines. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED extending the current motions deadlines to the 

following dates:

Motion Defendants Government

Rule 29 Motion for 

Judgment of Acquittal

Supplement:

December 4, 2023

Response:

December 18, 2023

Rule 33(b)(2) 

(new trial motion)

Motion: 

December 4, 2023

Response:

December 18, 2023

Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss (Jencks/Giglio)

Reply:

December 4, 2023

Response: 

November 27, 2023

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1983-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

DATED this ______ day of November, 2023. 

 

The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1983-1 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the ‘‘Form 10-Q’’) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (the ‘‘Issuer’’).





I, Tim Courtis, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





1.the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





2. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





Dated: November 2, 2009

/s/ Tim CourtisTim Courtis
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated March 10, 2008,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Vignette Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Vignette Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-72877, 333-91767, 333-30242, 333-41482, 333-59358, 333-100566, and333-107702) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-113674 and 333-33794). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

March 10, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15512]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CO-956-96-1420-00]


Colorado: Filing of Plats of Survey

May 24, 1996.
    The plats of survey of the following described land, will be 
officially filed in the Colorado State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, Lakewood, Colorado, effective 10:00 am., May 24, 1996. All 
inquiries should be sent to the Colorado State Office, Bureau of Land 
Management, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215.
    The plats (in 2 sheets) representing the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the north and south center line, portions of certain mineral 
claims, a portion of the I.O.O.F. cemetery, and the Metes-and-Bounds 
survey of certain irregular lot lines in section 11, T. 3 S., R. 73 W., 
Sixth Principal Meridian, Group 1121, Colorado, were accepted April 30, 
1996.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
subdivisional lines and the subdivision of section 21, T. 51 N., R. 8 
E., New Mexico Principal Meridian, Group 1046, Colorado, was accepted 
April 23, 1996.
    These surveys were executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
this Bureau.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
east and north boundaries and subdivisional lines and the survey of the 
subdivision of certain sections in T. 3 S., R. 92 W., Sixth Principal 
Meridian, Group 1093, Colorado, was accepted April 15, 1996.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the U. S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
Colorado-New Mexico State Line through Range 2 West, a portion of the 
west boundary and the subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of 
sections 18 and 19, T. 32 N., R. 2 W., New Mexico Principal Meridian, 
Group 1049, Colorado was approved April 18, 1996.
    This survey was executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of a portion of the 
north boundary (north boundary Southern Ute Indian Reservation) and a 
portion of the subdivisional lines, T. 34 N., R. 9 W., (South of the 
Ute Line), New Mexico Principal Meridian, Group 1127, Colorado, was 
approved April 30, 1996.
    The plats (in 17 sheets) representing the metes-and-bounds survey 
of a portion of the north and south boundaries of the Highline Canal 
(Tracts 1-58), and the dependent resurvey of portions of the west 
boundary and certain subdivisional lines, and the subdivision of 
certain sections, T. 11 S., R. 98 W., Sixth Principal Meridian, Group 
1102, Colorado, were approved April 22, 1996.
    These surveys were executed to meet certain administrative needs of 
the Bureau of Reclamation.
Barry G. Krebs,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado
[FR Doc. 96-15512 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Xenacare Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | /s/ Bobby Story        
| | Bobby Story            
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | Date: August 16, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Alan Stock

Alan StockChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31165-31166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15543]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 31166]]


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,113]


Eagle Garment Finishing, Inc. A/K/A Pastar, Inc. El Paso, Texas; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on April 24, 1996, applicable to 
all workers of Eagle Garment Finishing, Inc. located in El Paso, Texas. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 24, 1996 (61 FR 
26219).
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in employment related to the production of denim apparel. New 
Information submitted to the Department shows that some of the workers 
had their wages reported to a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax 
account, Pastar, Inc., which is the parent company of Eagle Garment 
Finishing, Inc.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firms who were adversely affected by increased 
imports. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to 
cover workers of Pastar, Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,113 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Eagle Garment Finishing Inc., a/k/a Pastar, Inc., 
El Paso, Texas, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after March 18, 1995, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 6th day of June 1996.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-15543 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                         PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
    MASTER SERVICER'S ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE/OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

PNC Bank, National Association,                 Bankers Trust Company,
 as Transferor                                    as Indenture Trustee
2600 Liberty Avenue, Suite 200                  Four Albany Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15222                            New York, NY 10006
Attention: Mr. John J. Peters                   Attention: Ms. Lillian Peros

The First National Bank of Chicago
 as Eligible Lender Trustee
153 West 51st Street, 5th Floor
New York, NY 10019
Attention: Mr. Steven M. Husbands

    Re:    PNC Student Loan Trust - Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as
           of June 25, 1997, as amended by Transfer Agreement:
                           No. 1 dated August 27, 1997
                           No. 2 dated September 12, 1997
                           No. 3 dated September 24, 1997
                           No. 4 dated October 8, 1997
                           No. 5 dated October 23, 1997
                           No. 6 dated November 7, 1997
                           No. 7 dated November 24, 1997
                           No. 8 dated December 5, 1997
                           No. 9 dated December 29, 1997 and Amendment No. 1
           and Transfer Agreement dated as of January 28, 1998 (as amended,
           the "Agreement")

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Section 4.8 of the above-referenced Agreement, the undersigned
officer of PNC Bank, National Association, in its capacity as Master Servicer,
hereby certifies that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from the
Closing Date through December 31, 1997 and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision: and

2. To the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
Master Servicer has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout the period from the Closing Date through December
31, 1997.

Capitalized terms used in this certificate without definition have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

Very truly yours,

PNC Bank, National Association,
 as Master Servicer

By: /s/ JOHN J. PETERS
   -----------------------
John J. Peters
Vice President

March 30, 1998

cc:      Helen P. Pudlin
         Senior Vice President and General Counsel
         PNC Bank, National Association
         One PNC Plaza
         249 Fifth Avenue, 21st Floor
         Pittsburgh, PA 15222
----

EXHIBIT 31.1 

I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacity indicated below, certifythat: 

1. 

I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-QSB of Opencell Biomed, Inc. (the "Registrant");

2. 

Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. 

Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 

4. 

I am responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a) 

designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b) 

evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and 

c) 

disclosed inthis report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant's internal control over financial reporting; 

5.

Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) 

all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) 

any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 15, 2010
/s/ Mislav Pavelic                                   
 
Mislav Pavelic, President
#### Harold WILSON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Keith MERRILL, Defendant/Respondent.

No. 69386.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Oct. 15, 1996.

Arthur C. Shivers, St. Louis, for Plain-tiffjAppellant.

Harold L. Whitfield, St. Louis, for Defen-dan VRespondent.

ORDER

Before AHRENS, C.J., CRANDALL, J., and BLACKMAR, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Harold Wilson, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of defendant, Keith Merrill, in a personal injury action arising from an automobile accident. We have reviewed the record and find that the jury verdict was supported by sufficient evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

*532The judgment of the court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.160b).