i NO. 03

- 16

- 00 743

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

**************** ********* **********************



# F REDRICK LEE PERKINS

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

*************************** *******************

ON APPEAL FROM THE

2 6 4 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

BELL COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. 7 5912

**************** ******************



## BRIEF FOR THE STATE

**********************************

HENRY GARZA

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

27 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

BOB D. ODOM

A ssistant District Attorney

P.O. Box 540

Belton, Texas 76513

(254) 933

- 5215

Fax (254) 933

- 5704

DistrictAttorney@ bellcounty.texas.gov

ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE ACCEPTED

03-16-00743-CR

14025455

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/30/2016 12:49:55 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKii TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table o f Authorities

................................ ................................ ................................ ................. ii

Appellant’s Brief

................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 1

Prayer

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 2

Certificate o f Compliance w ith Rule 9

................................ ................................ ................ 2

Certificate o f Service

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 3iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967)

................................ ................................ ................................ ... 1

Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex.Cr.App.1969)

................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 11 APPELLANT'S BRIEF

After a review of the record, the Appellant's counsel concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and that there are no arguable points of error (Appellant’s

Brief, pp. 1, 7).

Wherefore, Premises Considered, the State of Texas prays that the

decision of the Trial Court be affirmed, Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 ( Tex.Cr.App.1969).2 PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, and since no reversible

error is shown, the State respectfully prays that this Court affirm the conviction.

Respectfully subm itted,

HENRY L. GARZA

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

27 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/S/ 

## Bob D. Odom

BOB D. ODOM

Assistant District Attorney

P. O. Box 540

Belton, Texas 76513

Bar I.D. # 15200000

(254) 933

- 5215 / Fax (254) 933

- 5704

DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9

This is to certify that the State’s Brief is in compliance with Rule 9 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that portion which must be included

under Rule 9.4(i)(1) contains 369 words.

/S/ 

## Bob D. Odom

BOB D. ODOM

Assistant District Attorney3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the State's Brief has been

sent to the attorney of record, Ken Mahaffey

, by e

- service to

K en_Mahaffey@yahoo.com

, on this the 3 0 th day of N ovember

, 201 6

.

HENRY L. GARZA

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

27 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/S/ 

## Bob D. Odom

BOB D. ODOM

Assistant District Attorney

P. O. Box 540

Belton, Texas 76513

Bar I.D. # 15200000

(254) 933

- 5215 / Fax (254) 933

- 5704

DistrictAttorney@ bellcounty.texas.gov