alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15544]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,162]


Joe Benbasset, Incorporated, New York, New York; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 8, 1996 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers and former workers at Joe Benbasset, 
Incorporated, located in New York, New York (TA-W-32,162).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no 
purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of June 1996.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-15544 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LARRY L. DEBUS, State Bar #002037

LAWRENCE I. KAZAN, State Bar #005456

Debus, Kazan & Westerhausen, Ltd.

335 East Palm Lane

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Telephone: (602) 257-8900

Facsimile: (602) 257-0723

E-Mail: lld@dkwlawyers.com

E-Mail: lik@dkwlawyers.com

Attorneys for Defendant Lacey 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MICHAEL LACEY, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL

Larry Debus and Larry Kazan of Debus, Kazan & Westerhausen, Ltd. hereby withdraw 

as counsel in this matter. Undersigned counsel’s appearances were limited to the Initial 

Appearance and Mr. Lacey is represented by Paul Cambria. 

Respectfully submitted this 29th day of May 2018.

DEBUS, KAZAN & WESTERHAUSEN, LTD

By 

Larry L. Debus

Lawrence I. Kazan

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 165 Filed 05/29/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 29th day of May 2018, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the ECF System, which will send a filing 

notification to all counsel of record.

By 

Larry L. Debus

Lawrence I. Kazan

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 165 Filed 05/29/18 Page 2 of 2
Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v.

Joye Vaught,

Defendant.

 CR-2018-0422-DJH

MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR MS. 

VAUGHT APPEAR BY PHONE OR 

VIDEOCONFERENCING AT 

AUGUST 18, 2023 STATUS 

CONFERENCE

NOW COMES the Defendant, Joye Vaught, by and through her counsel of 

record, Joy Bertrand, to ask this Court for leave for her to appear by phone or 

video conferencing at the August 18, 2023 Status in this matter. As further 

grounds therefore, the Defendant submits the following:

This matter has two hearings set on the morning of August 18, 2023: a 

status conference before Judge Humetewa and a Frye-Cooper hearing before 

Judge Fine. By this Motion, she asks for leave to appear at the status conference 

before Judge Humetewa by phone or videoconferencing. She will file a separate 

motion regarding the Frye-Cooper hearing. 

Joy Bertrand, Esq.

PO Box 2734

Scottsdale, Arizona 85252-2734

Telephone: 602-374-5321

Fax: 480-361-4694

joyous@mailbag.com

www.joybertrandlaw.com

Arizona State Bar No. 024181

ATTORNEY FOR: DEFENDANT

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1697 Filed 08/14/23 Page 1 of 3
Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Ms. Vaught lives in the Dallas, Texas area. Round-trip airfare to Phoenix 

and lodging would cost approximately $1,000 before ground transportation – a 

considerable expense for Ms. Vaught, who remains indigent. 

The Court has allowed Ms. Vaught to appear at prior final pretrial 

conferences and other substantive hearings by phone. Ms. Vaught can be 

available by phone or videoconferencing for the August 18, 2023 hearings. 

The Court will find attached a proposed Order.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on August 14, 2023.

s/Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1697 Filed 08/14/23 Page 2 of 3
Page 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On August 14, 2023, I, Joy Bertrand, attorney for the Defendant, Joye 

Vaught, filed the Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appear by Phone at August 

18, 2023 Status Conference and Frye-Cooper Hearing with the Arizona District 

Court’s electronic filing system. Based on my training and experience with 

electronic filing in the federal courts, it is my understanding that a copy of this 

request will be electronically served upon opposing counsel and codefendant 

counsel upon its submission to the Court.

Respectfully submitted this Eighteenth day of August, 2023.

s/Joy Bertrand

Joy Bertrand

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1697 Filed 08/14/23 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants. 

CR-18-422-PHX-SMB 

 ORDER 

 Based on the United States’ Motion to Extend Deadline for Response to Defendants’ 

Motion to Compel, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the United States’ motion and extending the 

deadline for it to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Compel (doc. 643) to July 15, 2019. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) is 

found to commence from ___________________ through _____________________. 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 645-1 Filed 06/21/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in the capacity as an officer of the General
Partner of the Company, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                    |       |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|------------------- | ----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May
 15, 2009 | By:   |  | /s/ Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                    | Name: |  | Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                    | Title |  | Executive
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.



---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 26944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-13396]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Hartford District Advisory Council Meeting; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Hartford District Advisory 
Council will hold a public meeting on Monday, June 17, 1996 at 8:30 
a.m. at 2 Science Park, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, to discuss 
matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small 
Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Ms. Jo-Ann Van Vechten, 
District Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 330 Main Street, 
Hartford, Connecticut, (860) 240-4670.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
Michael P. Novelli,
Director, Office of Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 96-13396 Filed 5-28-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 Exhibit 10.5.1  


 
 

  AMENDMENT TO THE
  EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH DIGHTON PACKARD, M.D.    
    



        WHEREAS, Emergency Medical Services L.P. ("Company") and Dighton Packard, M.D. ("Executive") entered into an Employment
Agreement ("Agreement") on April 19, 2005, as amended; and 


        WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to reflect compliance with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended effective January 1, 2009 as follows: 


        1.     Section 7.F.(ii)
is deleted and replaced with the following: 




	(ii)
	base
compensation in the amount payable on the date immediately prior to termination for an additional period of one (1) year following the date of
termination, payable on the Company's regularly scheduled payroll dates during such period, plus 





        2.     The
following language is added to the end of Section 7.F: 




For
purposes of Section 409A of the Code, the right to a series of installment payments hereunder shall be treated as a right to a series of separate payments. Notwithstanding anything herein
to the contrary, in the event that Executive is determined to be a specified employee within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code for purposes of any payment on termination of employment
hereunder, and such payment (or any portion thereof) does not meet the short-term deferral exception, the involuntary separation from service exception or another applicable exception to
deferred compensation for purposes of Section 409A of the Code, payment shall be made or begin, as applicable, on the first payroll date which is more than six months following the date of
separation from service, to the extent required to avoid any adverse tax consequences under Section 409A of the Code. 














IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Executive have executed this Agreement, in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, this 30th day of December, 2008 and effective
January 1, 2009. 



							
	
 COMPANY	
 	
ATTEST:
	
 By:	
 	
/s/ William A. Sanger







 	
 	
By:	
 	








 
	
 Its:	
 	
Chairman and CEO







 	
 	
Its:	
 	








 






 





							
	

EXECUTIVE	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

/s/ Dighton Packard, M.D.








 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	
 Print:	
 	
Dighton Packard, M.D.







 	
 	

 	
 	

 














QuickLinks


AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH DIGHTON PACKARD, M.D.
EXHIBIT 2E

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-6 Filed 03/12/19 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-6 Filed 03/12/19 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-6 Filed 03/12/19 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-6 Filed 03/12/19 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-6 Filed 03/12/19 Page 5 of 5
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB 

ORDER 

Based on the government’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Third Request), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the motion and extending the deadline for 

the United States to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Indictment (doc. 561) from 

May 29, 2019 to June 12, 2019. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) is 

found to commence from _________________ through __________________. 

 Dated this 28th day of May, 2019. 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 618 Filed 05/28/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 5, 2010By:
    
    /s/ Alan Stock

Alan StockChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



Statement of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of SDG&E Funding LLC (the "Company") certifies that:



(i)

the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







March 27, 2007

/s/ James P. TrentJames P. TrentChief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-45949, File No. 333-68855 and File No.
333-77111) of PMA Capital Corporation of our report dated February 2, 2000
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the 1999 Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 2, 2000
relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2000
Exhibit 10.4(e2)


TEXT OF NOTICE ANNOUNCING MODIFICATION OF
PERFORMANCE GOAL

CALCULATION METHOD RELATED TO 2008 EXECUTIVE AWARDS OF

PERFORMANCE RESTRICTED STOCK


	
 

	
 


	
Note:

	
The Corporation issued two types of
 performance-based awards in 2008, one (performance restricted stock)
 primarily for executives and one (LTI Units) which executives did not
 receive. Both types used the same performance goal. The following notice was
 written for and sent to LTI recipients, but also applied to the executives’
 performance goal and was sent to them.


	
 

	
 


	







Changes
to the Earnings Per Share (EPS) Targets for the Long-Term Incentive Cash Unit
and Performance Restricted Stock


In April of this year, you received a cash-based long-term incentive
units award (LTIs), with vesting subject to achieving an annual EPS of $2 per
share by the end of 2012. 


The issuance of approximately 70 million additional shares in May
diluted this performance target and further dilution will occur as dividends
are paid in stock. 


To address this issue, the Company recently approved a change in the
performance target for the LTI program. A straight formula will be used to
adjust the $2 earnings target as follows:


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
●

	
Multiply $2 by a fraction, of which the numerator is 126 million
 shares (outstanding shares when the target was set) and the denominator is
 the number of actual shares outstanding at the end of the performance year
 (Example: if 200 million shares are outstanding at the end of the year, the
 EPS target for that performance year would be 126/200 × $2 = $1.26)
 





What does this mean? At the time when the awards are scheduled to vest,
the revised formula will be applied and award vesting will be determined based
on this adjusted performance criteria.
---

---

Exhibit 15.1

The Board of Directors
RiT Technologies Ltd.
Tel-Aviv
Israel.

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement of RiT Technologies Ltd. on Form F-3 (File No.
333-118354) and in Registration Statement on form S-8 (File Nos. 333-07510, 333-07512,
333-08206, 333-13656, 333-90750 and 333-117646) of our report dated March 28, 2008, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of RiT Technologies Ltd. as of December 31,
2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the
December 31, 2007, annual report on Form 20-F of RiT Technologies Ltd.

|/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Somekh ChaikinCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A Member Firm of KPMG International |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Tel Aviv, Israel

March 27, 2008



---

---
laDmamentams 

withdraw his guilty plea. See Molina v. State, 120 Nev. 185, 191, 87 P.3d 

533, 537-38 (2004) ("A thorough plea canvass coupled with a detailed, 

consistent, written plea agreement supports a finding that the defendant 

entered the plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently." (internal 

quotation marks omitted)).' 

Young also asserts that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel 

and unusual punishment. 2Young's sentence of 48 to 120 months in prison 

is within the parameters of NRS 205.067(2), he does not allege that the 

statute is unconstitutional, and we are not convinced that the sentence 

imposed is so disproportionate to the gravity of the offense as to shock the 

conscience. See Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) 

(plurality opinion); Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 

(1996). Therefore, we conclude that the sentence does not constitute cruel 

and unusual punishment, and we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

pc 

Parraguirre 

1To the extent Young asserts that his plea was not knowingly 

entered because he was not aware of the consequences of habitual criminal 

treatment, he did not raise this claim in the district court and we decline 

to address it on appeal in the first instance. O'Guinn v. State, 118 Nev. 

849, 851, 59 P.3d 488, 489-90 (2002). Further, we note that the district 

court declined to adjudicate Young as a habitual criminal. 

2District Judge Linda Marie Bell imposed Young's sentence. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 4,67AE> 
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge 

Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge 

Law Offices of Martin Hart, LLC 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A
**EXHIBIT 21.1****RCN CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES****EXHIBIT**   **Entity Name** **Jurisdiction of Incorporation**   RCN Corporation Delaware   **RCN Corporation Subsidiaries:**     Brain Storm Networks, Inc. CaliforniaNEON Communications Group, Inc. DelawareRCN Digital Services, LLC DelawareRCN Entertainment, Inc. DelawareRCN Finance LLC DelawareRCN Financial Management, Inc. DelawareRCN Internet Services, Inc. DelawareRCN Telecom Services, Inc. PennsylvaniaRCN Telecom Services of Illinois, LLC IllinoisRFM 2 LLC DelawareRLH Property Corporation New JerseyTEC AIR, Inc. DelawareUNET Holding, Inc. Delaware   **RCN Entertainment, Inc. Subsidiaries:**     Hot Spot Productions, Inc. New YorkON TV, Inc. New York   **RCN Internet Services, Inc. Subsidiary:**     RCN Telecom Services of Washington, D.C., Inc.(52%) District of Columbia   **RCN Telecom Services of Massachusetts, Inc. Subsidiary:**     RCN-BecoCom, Inc. Massachusetts   **RCN Telecom Services, Inc. Subsidiaries:**     RCN International Holdings, Inc. DelawareRCN New York Communications, LLC d/b/a RCN Metro Optical Networks New YorkRCN Telecom Services of Massachusetts, Inc. MassachusettsRCN Telecom Services of Philadelphia, Inc. PennsylvaniaRCN Telecom Services of Virginia, Inc. VirginiaRCN Telecom Services of Washington, D.C., Inc.(48%) District of Columbia   **RCN Telecom Services of Illinois, LLC Subsidiaries:**     21st Century Telecom Services, Inc. DelawareRCN Cable TV of Chicago, Inc. Delaware
 
1

 
   **Entity Name** **Jurisdiction of Incorporation**   **RCN Telecom Services of Washington,D.C. Subsidiary:**     Starpower Communications LLC Delaware   **NEON Communications Group, Inc. Subsidiary:**     NEON Communications, Inc. d/b/a RCN MetroOptical Networks DelawareATC Merger Corp. New York415 Greenwich GC Tenant, LLC New York415 Greenwich GC MM LLC New York   **NEON Communications, Inc. Subsidiaries:**     NEON Connect, Inc. d/b/a RCN Metro Optical Networks  DelawareNEON Optica, Inc.d/b/a RCN Metro Optical Networks DelawareNEON Transcom, Inc. DelawareNEON Virginia Connect, LLC Delaware   **NEON Optica, Inc. Subsidiaries:**     NorthEast Optic Network of Connecticut, Inc. DelawareNorthEast Optic Network of New York, Inc. DelawareNEON Securities Corp. Massachusetts
 
2