alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Dewayne Frederick Johnson , et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CR-18-00346-001-PHX-DJH 

ORDER 

(Second Request) 

 Upon motion of the Defendant Johnson, no objection by the co-defendant or by 

the Government, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion to Continue Trial and Pretrial 

Deadlines (Doc. 27) for the reasons stated in the motion. 

 This Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by granting a 

continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. 

This finding is based upon the Court's conclusion that the failure to grant such a 

continuance would deny the Defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective 

preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) 

and (B)(iv). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the trial from July 3, 2018 to October 

2, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., in Phoenix, Arizona, and continuing the pretrial motion deadline 

until September 7, 2018. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that if any subpoenas were previously issued and 

Case 2:18-cr-00346-DJH Document 29 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

served in this matter, that they remain in effect and are answerable at the new trial date 

and the party who served the subpoena should advise the witnesses of the trial date. 

 The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h) from July 4, 2018 to 

October 2, 2018. 

 Dated this 9th day of May, 2018. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa 

United States District Judge 

 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00346-DJH Document 29 Filed 05/09/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit B 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-2 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Date adult entertainment buy, sell, trade community musician real estate for sale services Local Places automotive jobs 

10/1/10 1,172,388.49 $ 882.17 $ 203.92 $ 192.47 $ 466.76 $ 29,475.57 $ 217.08 $ 1,075.86 $ 

11/1/10 3,281,842.25 27,151.65 7,064.55 3,572.35 8,873.14 134,417.55 5,613.14 24,467.41 

12/1/10 3,359,721.43 24,657.33 6,896.41 2,912.25 7,726.00 142,663.15 4,242.28 19,306.08 

1/1/11 3,636,542.38 21,733.59 6,528.43 3,279.75 8,531.46 167,174.23 4,182.64 21,868.12 

2/1/11 3,422,812.18 26,341.35 5,560.14 2,723.04 8,005.27 157,035.82 5,096.48 26,411.74 

3/1/11 4,120,845.18 36,339.23 8,923.21 3,186.09 9,846.36 179,730.21 4,106.44 23,818.34 

4/1/11 4,142,653.77 26,077.30 6,580.42 3,130.21 8,492.96 175,922.93 5,279.88 16,368.60 

5/1/11 4,521,199.08 28,851.01 5,982.85 4,068.25 7,889.32 194,051.89 5,466.18 14,534.66 

6/1/11 4,690,660.37 31,597.43 6,238.32 3,162.80 7,961.59 214,153.72 5,867.70 14,614.23 

7/1/11 4,808,444.94 26,050.38 7,209.08 3,016.85 7,531.78 213,609.62 4,943.80 13,881.12 

8/1/11 4,924,207.19 24,953.14 7,796.55 2,527.92 7,123.66 216,886.61 4,084.69 14,952.00 

9/1/11 4,864,109.40 33,300.14 7,771.01 2,731.84 6,262.62 221,825.56 3,691.96 11,450.17 

10/1/11 5,103,094.84 25,963.16 6,718.70 2,152.78 5,749.88 238,869.65 4,972.68 13,221.22 

11/1/11 4,966,743.65 23,353.12 4,906.76 2,447.68 3,996.78 221,109.90 4,288.86 12,950.03 

12/1/11 5,229,829.96 21,595.54 4,847.72 2,363.16 4,471.51 217,695.47 11.58 5,049.84 9,742.03 

1/1/12 5,263,107.33 25,502.90 5,663.37 2,741.32 5,962.85 249,105.31 19.43 4,834.03 14,472.58 

2/1/12 5,122,707.17 29,191.91 5,733.61 2,393.99 5,479.42 239,671.08 43.05 4,769.42 12,921.92 3/1/12 6,105,260.59 34,917.85 6,042.17 2,380.07 5,986.16 275,823.27 142.05 4,625.69 11,988.95 

4/1/12 6,046,400.44 30,082.83 6,339.32 3,564.42 6,560.98 270,975.77 276.35 4,327.02 11,536.40 

5/1/12 6,805,397.88 34,265.56 7,059.33 2,028.00 5,539.45 278,077.72 187.60 4,236.77 9,624.27 

6/1/12 7,333,857.91 28,734.39 8,003.85 3,202.16 6,611.34 283,794.46 233.28 4,087.82 8,632.55 

7/1/12 7,751,310.96 31,839.88 6,833.60 2,264.26 6,058.67 312,728.74 249.79 4,594.90 8,041.68 

8/1/12 8,257,268.93 30,412.05 6,273.77 2,677.81 5,996.06 314,237.44 357.02 3,196.58 7,113.81 

9/1/12 7,868,991.49 35,384.86 6,545.39 3,502.28 4,738.66 310,711.46 494.88 3,672.00 6,865.79 

10/1/12 8,277,525.99 32,413.66 6,957.05 2,600.07 4,594.90 338,345.36 351.71 4,057.74 9,864.06 

11/1/12 7,773,173.56 33,351.21 3,505.20 2,050.36 2,986.01 319,921.10 515.96 3,168.96 7,293.66 

Total by Section 138,850,097.36 $ $ 724,943.64 $ 162,184.73 $ 70,872.18 $ 163,443.59 $ 5,918,013.59 $ 2,882.70 $ 112,674.58 $ 347,017.28 

Gross Revenue by Section

10/1/2010 - 11/1/2012

Analysis derived from file (ATTACHMENT – Monthly Revenue & Ad Count report by Sect

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-2 Filed 08/19
#### Mary Elizabeth RENDE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Richard Joseph RENDE, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Nos. 64387, 64388.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two.

Nov. 1, 1994.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Dec. 8, 1994.

Mark Howard Kruger, Randall B. Kahn, Clayton, for appellant.

Allan F. Stewart, Clayton, Stephen M. Hereford, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and KAROHL and CRAHAN, JJ.

*740
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the trial court modifying maintenance. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the circuit court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Order filed, May 19, 2022

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 22

- 00256

- CV

ELEANOR O. SLANE , Appellant

V.

BOB BOROCHOFF , Appellee

On Appeal from the 2 70th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 2021

- 69655



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 14, 2022

. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.1. On May 4, 2022 , this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 10 days . The record ha s not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Julian Lynn Rivera , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal , if any, within 10 days of the date of this o rder

.N o further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The

trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. Se e Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If the reporter does not timel y file the record as ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to
determine the reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 10.4
 EXHIBIT B ADDENDUM #2
to
CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC TOLL PROCESSING AGREEMENT
 Crude Soybean Oil
  Recitals
     Additional Feedstock Specifications.
 Yield Requirement for Additional Feedstock
  ***
    
    Portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the
SEC.




---



##### 



Economic Adjustment to Agreement
  Other Terms Unchanged.
 Miscellaneous
  CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC
    
    
    
    REG MARKETING & LOGISTICS GROUP, LLCBy:
    
    /s/James Johnston
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Nile D. RamsbottomName: James Johnston
    
    
    
    
    
    Name: Nile D. RamsbottomTitle:   Chairman
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:   President




---



##### 



Free Fatty Acids as(Oleic)
    
    Mosture
    
    PhosphorousAnalytical Method
    
    AOCS Ca 5a-40
    
    AOCS Ca 2c-25
    
    AOCS Ca 12-55Units
    
    % (w/w)
    
    % (w/w)
    
    PpmFeedstock TypeCrude Soybean Oil
    
    0.55
    
    0.2
    
    600
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA - PHOENIX

CRIMINAL MINUTES 

SEALED

Case No. CR-18-00422-007-PHX-SPL Date: 4/6/2018 

United States of America v. Joye Vaught 

Presiding: Hon. Eileen S. Willett, United States Magistrate Judge 

 

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Margaret Perlmeter and Dominic Lanza 

Attorneys for Defendant: Stephen M. Weiss 

Defendant: X Present X Custody (restraint level 0) Date of Arrest: 4/6/18 

Deputy Clerk: Marion Holmes Court Reporter/ECR: Recorded by CourtSmart 

PROCEEDINGS: Open Court Chambers Other X SEALED 

Initial Appearance and Arraignment held. Notice of Appearance filed in court by retained attorney

Stephen M. Weiss. Counsel for the Government advises that a redacted copy of the Indictment has been

provided to defense counsel. Defendant waives a formal reading of the Indictment and enters a plea of

NOT guilty to all pending counts. 

IT IS ORDERED setting Jury Trial for June 5, 2018 at 9:00 AM before Judge Steven P. Logan in

Courtroom 501. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting a deadline of 21 days for all pretrial motions.

The Government is not seeking detention, as the parties have stipulated as to release conditions. IT IS

ORDERED releasing the defendant on her personal recognizance with conditions. Conditions of release

reviewed on the record with the defendant. 

The Court has made an individualized determination that restraints are unnecessary on the defendant

in the courtroom.

IA: 3 min.

ARR: 2 mins.

DH: 12 min.

4:35 p.m. to 4:52 p.m.

cc: AUSA, Dft’s Cnsl, PTS, USMS, SPL

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 18 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 1
RICHARD M.A. LEE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4460

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

George S. Reynolds, III, Judge.

Richard M.A. Lee, pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
EX-4.1






EXHIBIT 4.1




CUSIP No. 45928H106




AGREEMENT CONCERNING JOINT FILING

OF SCHEDULE 13D




     The undersigned agree as follows:



     (i) each of them is individually eligible to use the Schedule 13D to which this Exhibit is
attached, and such Schedule 13D is filed on behalf of each of them; and



     (ii) each of them is responsible for the timely filing of such Schedule 13D and any amendments
thereto, and for the completeness and accuracy of the information concerning such person contained
therein; but none of them is responsible for the completeness or accuracy of the information
concerning the other person making the filing, unless such person knows or has reason to believe
that such information is inaccurate.



     This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to
be an original, but all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.



     Dated: February 25, 2009



 









 





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	V. PREM WATSA	 
	 
	 	
/s/ V. Prem Watsa
	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	1109519 ONTARIO LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE SIXTY TWO INVESTMENT COMPANY

LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	810679 ONTARIO LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ V. Prem Watsa
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	V. Prem Watsa 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Paul Rivett
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Paul Rivett 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Donald L. Smith
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Donald L. Smith 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ODYSSEY AMERICA REINSURANCE

CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Donald L. Smith
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Donald L. Smith 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CLEARWATER INSURANCE COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Donald L. Smith
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Donald L. Smith 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Paul Bassaline
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Paul Bassaline 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	THE NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Paul Bassaline
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Paul Bassaline 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Vice President 	 



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	TIG INSURANCE COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John J. Bator
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John J. Bator 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer
#### Tommy J. MARTIN, Defendant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 69395.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 30, 1996.

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Sally Holdings LLC and Sally Capital Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GaryG. Winterhalter, President and Chief Executive Officer of each of theCompanies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.

 

 
|                   | By:    | /s/ GARY G. WINTERHALTER                                 |   |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Gary G. Winterhalter                                     |
|                   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer of Sally  Holdings |
|                   |   | LLC and Sally Capital Inc.                               |
|                   |   |                                                     |
|                   |   |                                                     |
| February 14, 2008 |   |                                                     |

 

----
Summary of Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. Board of Directors Compensation.



 Exhibit 10.39 
 ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD. 
 CURRENT BOARD OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SCHEDULE 
  

				
	 Cash Compensation
	  	Annual
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	50,000
	 Audit Committee Chairman Retainer
	  	$	30,000
	 Audit Committee Member Retainer
	  	$	15,000
	 Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer
	  	$	15,000
	 Committee Chairman Retainer (All Other Committees)
	  	$	6,000
	 Committee Member Retainer (All Other Committees)
	  	$	5,000
	 Board Per Meeting Fees
	  	$	1,200
	 Committee Per Meeting Fees (All Committees)
	  	$	1,200

 At the discretion of the Board, each non-employee director is eligible to receive an annual grant of equity awards
with an aggregate value on the date of grant equal to $90,000. Two-thirds of this annual grant is awarded in the form of restricted stock units and one-third is awarded in the form of options to purchase the Company’s common stock. 

The Company provides Board members with certain cruise benefits in accordance with the Company’s Board Member Cruise Policy.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6613**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,
v. CHRISTOPHER RAESEAN JOHNSON, a/k/a C

- Murder , Defendant

- Appell ant .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:05

- cr - 00209

- FL

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 00304

- FL)

Submitted : August 30, 2013 Decided: September 10, 2013

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher Raesean Johnson , Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Felice McConnell Corpening, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITE D STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Raesean Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation t o treat his motion to vacate as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion and dismissing it on that basis. The district court’s dismissal order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

– El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

– 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S.
at 484

– 85. We have independently reviewed th e record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is C ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Henry E. TWOMEY, Jr., Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64566.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Becky Owenson Kilpatrick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Henry E. Twomey, Jr., appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion. The motion court dismissed movant’s motion as untimely filed.

No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The order of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.-16(b).
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10356

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARCIA CARAWAY MORRISON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-224-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marcia Caraway Morrison appeals her 70-month prison sentence for 

wire fraud. She challenges the district court’s denial of a reduction of her 

offense level for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. Our 

review is even more deferential than review for clear error, and we will affirm 

the district court’s decision unless it is without foundation. United States v. 

Solis, 299 F.3d 420, 458 (5th Cir. 2002).

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10356 Document: 00513872540 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2017
No. 16-10356

2

At her rearraignment, Morrison stated under oath that a written 

summary of the facts supporting her guilty plea was true and correct. The 

summary stated that Morrison transferred $50,000 from a bank account 

without the owner’s knowledge or consent. The information to which Morrison 

pleaded guilty identified this $50,000 transfer as the basis for the wire fraud 

count. 

During a presentence interview, however, Morrison stated that the 

$50,000 was a loan. Morrison thus denied conduct comprising the offense of 

conviction. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.1(A)); United States v. Galban, 

No. 93-3844, 1994 WL 399501, at *1 (5th Cir. July 22, 1994) (unpublished); see 

also 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.3 (unpublished opinions issue before 1996 are precedent). 

The district court’s ruling was not without foundation. See Solis, 299 F.3d at

458.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-10356 Document: 00513872540 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2017
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report (the "Report") on the Form 10-Q of Siga
Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the nine months ended October 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert
Malasek, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.

Date: December 15, 2010


/s/ ROBERT MALASEK
------------------------------------
Robert Malasek
Chief Accounting Officer
Chief Financial Officer and Director
Order filed, May 16, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00288-CR

____________

KENYATTA WESLEY FREDERICK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 413th Judicial District

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F46217

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 06, 2013. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Pam Waits, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 27 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 27 Filed 04/09/18 Page 2 of 2