alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 9, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk February 9, 2016

1 53035 ( 29 )

IN RE COLE

__________________________________

JIMMY RAE COLE

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 53035

COA: 329461

JACKSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

,

Defendant

- Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall p ay to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 25 .00, shall submit a copy of this order

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of

$3 50 .00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Firstway Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Tay, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ William Tay

By: William Tay

Title: Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director



Dated: July 18, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 909 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 909

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 18, 2009.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3791) to amend sections 33 and 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and 
Control Act of 1974, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science 
and Technology. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science and Technology 
now printed in the bill modified by the amendment printed in part A of the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in 
the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those 
arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no 
amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order 
except those printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each 
such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be 
offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 
shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and 
controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 
and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question. All points of 
order against such amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 
10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment, 
the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 
as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 
on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  The Chair may entertain a motion that the Committee rise only if 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Science and Technology or his designee. 
The Chair may not entertain a motion to strike out the enacting words of the 
bill (as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Travelport Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeff Clarke, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Rescoe, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of his knowledge:

/s/ Jeff Clarke
Jeff Clarke Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 26, 2008/s/ Michael E. Rescoe
Michael E. Rescoe Chief Financial OfficerSeptember 26, 2008


---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Rickey MIMS, Defendant/Appellant. Rickey MIMS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 64637, 66485.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

May 16, 1995.

Richard H. Sindel, Sindel & Sindel, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michelle A. Freund, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Rickey Mims appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, of trafficking drugs in the second degree in violation of § 195.223 (Cum.Supp.1992), tampering in the first degree in violation of § 569.080 RSMo 1986, and possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202 RSMo (Cum.Supp. 1992), on which he was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from an order denying on the merits, after an eviden-tiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion. However, defendant has abandoned this appeal by failing to brief any errors with respect to the denial of post-conviction relief.

With respect to the direct appeal, no error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*671The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1529]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket Nos. RP94-149-000 and RP94-145-000]


Pacific Gas Transmission; Notice of Informal Settlement 
Conference

January 23, 1996.
    Take notice that an informal settlement conference will be convened 
in this proceeding on Tuesday and Wednesday, January 30-31, 1996, at 
10:00 a.m., at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC, for the purpose of exploring 
the possible settlement of the above-referenced dockets.
    Any party, as defined by 18 CFR 385.102(c), or any participant, as 
defined by 18 CFR 385.102(b), is invited to attend. Persons wishing to 
become a party must move to intervene and receive intervenor status 
pursuant to the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 385.214).
    For additional information, please contact Betsy R. Carr at (202) 
208-1240 or Russell B. Mamone at (202) 208-0740.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-1529 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 12

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (Dollar Amounts In
Thousands)

|                                     |  |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------ |  |  | - | ------- | -
|                                     |  |  |   | 2002    |  
|                                     |  |  |   |         |  
|EARNINGS                             |  | 
|Pre-tax income (loss)                |  |  | $ | (79,157 | )
|Fixed charges                        |  |  |   | 4,611   |  
|                                     |  |  |   |         |  
|Total                                |  |  | $ | (74,546 | )
|                                     |  |  |   |         |  
|FIXED CHARGES                        |  | 
|Interest expense and amortization of |  | 
|debt discount and premium on all     |  | 
|indebtedness                         |  |  | $ | 3,257   |  
|Interest portion of rental expense   |  |  |   | 1,354   |  
|                                     |  |  |   |         |  
|Total fixed charges                  |  |  | $ | 4,611   |  
|                                     |  |  |   |         |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed           |  | 
|charges                              |  |  |   | (A)     |  

|(A) |  | Earnings
were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $79.2 million in 2002.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(B) |  | Earnings
were insufficient to cover fixed charges by $4.4 million in 2001.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT YOU FANG YUAN, AKA Youfa ng Yua n, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-72091 Age n c y No. A075-497-950 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. You Fa ng Yua n , a native and c itiz e n of C hina , pe titions pro se for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny i ng he r m otion to re c o nside r. Our jurisdic t ion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion to re c o nside r. Mohamme d v . Gonzale s , 400 

# FIL ED JUL 28 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).F.3d 785, 791 (9th C ir. 2005). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r Yua n’ s c ha lle nge s to theB IA’ s August 11, 2011, orde r dism issing he r a p pe a l from

the im m i gration judge ’ s de nia l of he r a sy lum and withholding of re m ova l c l a im s be c a

use Yua n did not pe tition for re vie w of tha

t orde r. Se e Me mbre no v . Gonzale s , 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th C ir. 2005). In de ny ing Yua

n’ s m otion to re c o nside r, the B IA found she fa ile d to e sta blish a ny e rror in its prior c onc lusion tha t she did not m e e t

he r burde n of proof to c o rroborate he r c la im unde r the REAL ID Ac t. The B IA did not a buse its disc re tion in m ak i ng this finding. Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(b)(1); Mohamme d , 400 F.3d at 791 (the c o urt re ve rse s the de nia l of a m o tion to re c onside r only if the B IA a c te d “ arbitra

rily , irrationa lly , or c ontra ry to la w” ). W e do not c o nside r the ne w c onte ntions re g arding c orroboration tha t Yua n ra ise s for the first tim e in he r ope ning brie f. Se e Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004) (no jurisdic tion to re v ie w issue s not e xha uste d in a dm inistra

tive proc e e dings be low). B e c a use this finding by

the B IA is dispositive

of he r m otion to re c onside r, we do not re a c h

Yua n’ s re m a i n ing c ha lle nge s to theB IA’ s de nia l of he r m otion. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t. 1 2 - 7 2 0 9 1 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. (NY Bar No.1430909, admitted pro hac vice) 

Erin McCampbell Paris (NY Bar No. 4480166, admitted pro hac vice) 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

pcambria@lglaw.com 

emccampbell@lglaw.com 

Attorneys for Michael Lacey 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB 

DEFENDANT MICHAEL LACEY’S 

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF 

FROM TRIAL SCHEDULE CONFLICT 

NOW COMES the Defendant, Michael Lacey, by his attorney of record, to ask the Court 

to grant a brief break during trial to accommodate an unmovable personal conflict during the period 

September 6, 2023 – September 8, 2023. As good cause therefore, the Defendant submits the 

following: 

Mr. Lacey’s undersigned counsel has an unmovable personal conflict. His daughter’s 

wedding rehearsal dinner is scheduled for September 6, 2023, and her wedding is scheduled for 

September 9, 2023. Both of these events will occur in Buffalo, New York. It is not possible to 

travel to and from the District of Arizona for these very important family milestones. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1629 Filed 07/06/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

This request is necessary because I am Mr. Lacey’s sole trial counsel. My partner, Erin 

McCampbell Paris, is not a trial attorney, and would be unable to assume my responsibilities in my 

absence. Further, Janey Henze Cook is conflicted from being trial counsel. (See Doc. 330.) 

Under the current trial schedule, the trial is at recess September 4 and 5, with full days on 

September 6 and 7, and a half day on September 8. The granting of this motion would result in the 

loss of just two and a half trial days. 

The Government does not object to this Motion. 

The Court will find attached a proposed Order. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of July, 2023, 

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

 By: /s/ Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

Attorneys for Michael Lacey 

On July 6, 2023, a PDF version 

of this document was filed with 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF 

System for filing and for Transmittal 

Of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the 

Following CM/ECF registrants: 

Kevin Rapp, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov 

Peter Kozinets, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov 

Daniel Boyle, daniel.boyle2@usdoj.gov 

Margaret Perlmeter, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

Andrew Stone, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov 

Austin Maxwell Berry, austin.berry2@usdoj.gov

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1629 Filed 07/06/23 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 06, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 06, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0208. CASCADE AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT LLC v. GEOFFREY ANTENOR 

VELAZCO et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STSV2022001947
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, Bobby Story, Chief Financial Officer of XenaCare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report").



The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 24th day of September 2007.



| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | ------------------------------
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | XENACARE HOLDINGS, INC.       
| |  |  |                               
| |  |  | /s/ Bobby Story               
| |  |  | Name: Bobby Story             
| |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CEO CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (i)
    
    the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
  /s/ Alan Stock

Alan Stock
Chief Executive Officer
  /s/ Carol Waldman

Name: Carol Waldman
Title: Notary Public
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Scott Spear, et al., 

 

Defendants.

Case No. CR18-00422-PHX-DJH

ORDER

THE COURT, upon review of the defendants’ Joint Motion for Leave to File 

Replies and to Extend Reply Deadline for Rules 29 and 33 Motions, and good cause 

appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED allowing the defendants leave to file replies 

regarding their Rules 29 and 33 Motions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the defendants’ Joint Motion to Extend 

Reply deadline to January 16, 2024.

DATED this ______ day of December, 2023.

 

The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2023-1 Filed 12/27/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2023-1 Filed 12/27/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 866 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 866

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      November 3, 2009.
Whereas the Veterans History Project was established by a unanimous vote of the 
        United States Congress to collect and preserve the wartime stories of 
        American veterans;
Whereas Congress charged the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress 
        to undertake the Veterans History Project and to engage the public in 
        the creation of a collection of oral histories that would be a lasting 
        tribute to individual veterans and an abundant resource for scholars;
Whereas there are 17,000,000 wartime veterans in America whose stories can 
        educate people of all ages about important moments and events in the 
        history of the United States and the world and provide instructive 
        narratives that illuminate the meanings of ``service'', ``sacrifice'', 
        ``citizenship'', and ``democracy'';
Whereas the Veterans History Project relies on a corps of volunteer 
        interviewers, partner organizations, and an array of civic minded 
        institutions nationwide who interview veterans according to the 
        guidelines it provides;
Whereas increasing public participation in the Veterans History Project will 
        increase the number of oral histories that can be collected and 
        preserved and increase the number of veterans it so honors; and
Whereas ``National Veterans Awareness Week'' commendably preceded this 
        resolution in the years 2005 and 2006: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes ``National Veterans Awareness Week'';
            (2) supports the designation of a ``National Veterans History 
        Project Week'';
            (3) calls on the people of the United States to interview at least 
        one veteran in their families or communities according to guidelines 
        provided by the Veterans History Project; and
            (4) encourages local, State, and national organizations along with 
        Federal, State, city and county governmental institutions to participate 
        in support of the effort to document, preserve, and honor the service of 
        American wartime veterans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```