alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 830 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 15, 2009. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

2442) to amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act to expand the Bay Area Regional Water Recycling Program, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
2 

•HRES 830 EH 

Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICKY GARRETT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 2:08-cv-14081

Judge: MARIANNE O. BATTANI

Mag. Judge: MICHAEL J. HLUCHANIUK 

CITY OF ST. CLAIR SHORES;

City of St. Clair Shores Police Officer,

SERGEANT DAVID CHAVIS; City of

St. Clair Shores Police Officer, DETECTIVE

THOMAS HANNON; JEFFREY WALLACE;

and SPECIAL AGENT MICHAEL SURATT,

Jointly and Severally,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER REFLECTING SUBSTITUTION

OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

AS A DEFENDANT IN COUNT I OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

The Court having been informed that the Attorney General's designee has certified that

defendant Michael Suratt was acting within the scope of his employment as an employee of the

United States at the time of the incident or incidents giving rise to this suit; and the Court having

been apprised of the substitution of the United States of America for this individual as a

defendant for Count I of the first amended complaint, pursuant to the Federal Employees

Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988 § 6, Pub. L. No. 100-694, 102 Stat. 4563

(1988), 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1); it is hereby

ORDERED that pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)(1) and § 2679(d)(1),

Count I of the first amended complaint is dismissed with respect to individual defendant Michael

Suratt on grounds that the exclusive remedy for the claim made in Count I against a federal

2:08-cv-14081-MOB-MJH Doc # 21 Filed 04/27/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 116
2

actor is an action against the United States of America, and because the United States has been

substituted for Michael Suratt as the defendant in Count I.

It is further ORDERED that the caption of this action shall be amended to reflect the

substitution of the United States as a defendant in Count I by adding “United States of America”

as a defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Issued this 27th day of April, 2009

s/Marianne O. Battani 

 MARIANNE O. BATTANI

 United States District Judge

2:08-cv-14081-MOB-MJH Doc # 21 Filed 04/27/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 117
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL MIKHAEL GERGES,

Appellant,

v.

JENNIFER ELAINE GERGES,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00006

- CV

Appeal from the

322nd District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 322

- 625953

- 17)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in that

part of the judgment finding that there was a risk of international abduction

, and in imposing

international abduction prevention measures. We therefore modify the tri al court ’ s Fi nal D ecree

of Divorce to dissolve th at portion of the judgment. We overrule A ppellant ’s other issues and

affirm the trial court’s judgment as so modified. We further order that Appellee recover from

Appellant and his sureties, if any, all cost s incurred in this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.5. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 49 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 06, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17I0026. NU ZETA OF LAMBDA CHI ALPHA FRATERNITY v. RACHEL B. MCKENZIE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: SU11CV1485
Exhibit 10.1




AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC

AND

MICHAEL T. LUTTON




Whereas, Michael T. Lutton  (“Lutton”), has agreed to serve on the Board of Directors of INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC. (“Corporation”) for the period of one year, beginning on this date (the “Term”); and




Whereas, Lutton has agreed to serve as President of the Corporation on a full time basis over said 12 month term, and direct the activities of the Corporation in establishing its new business activities; and




Whereas, as a result of his activities and efforts, it is expected that the Corporation will be able to fully develop its new Computer Technology and Equipment Manufacturer and Distribution Business; and




Whereas, the Corporation has no funds to pay cash compensation for the services of Lutton, and desires to compensate Lutton in stock for providing the aforesaid 12 months of full time service to the Corporation over the term;




Now, Therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of this 20th day of  February, 2009:




1.  Corporation hereby contracts to issue 120,000,000 shares of its Restricted Common to Lutton, and Lutton hereby accepts said shares, as full compensation to be paid to Lutton  by Corporation for Lutton’s full time services as President and a Director of the Corporation over the 12 month term of this Agreement, beginning as of the date of execution of this Agreement.  If for any reason either party terminates this Agreement before the end of its 12 month term, the aforesaid shares shall be prorated based on the number of months or portions of months during which Lutton rendered said services, and the portion of the shares allocable to the period of Lutton’s actual services shall be deemed earned and retained by Lutton, and the balance of the shares shall be deemed unearned, and returned to the Corporation for cancellation.




2.  The parties hereto further agree that since Corporation is in the process of amending its Articles of Incorporation to increase its authorized capital stock so that it can lawfully issue additional shares, and Corporation can not issue shares until said amendment is complete, that Corporation shall immediately amend its Articles to permit it to issue the shares provided for by this Agreement, and the parties further agree that by their execution of this Agreement, Corporation is bound to issue the aforesaid shares in full, as soon as its Articles are amended, and the shares so to be issued shall be deemed fully earned and vested as of the date of execution of this Agreement by the Parties hereto, but subject to pro ration of the shares and the return of unearned shares if the Agreement is canceled before the end of its 12 month term, as described above.




3.  Either party may cancel this agreement on 10 days written notice to the other, with or without cause.







INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.







BY: /s/ RICHARD DAMION

          RICHARD DAMION, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

     




     /s/ MICHAEL T. LUTTON

         MICHAEL LUTTON
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed August 30, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01133-CV 

No. 05-13-01134-CV 

IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. W10-01183-J, W10-01184-J 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice FitzGerald 

The Court has before it relator’s “Order for Hearing to Show Proof of Fraud, Tampering 

with Government Documents and Illegal Convictions.” We treat this document as a petition for 

writ of mandamus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount 

them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to 

the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320-21 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the 

Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we 

DENY relator=s petition for writ of mandamus. 

131133F.P05 

/Kerry P. FitzGerald/ 

KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
EX-10.4






Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT




SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND AFFILIATES

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective August 1, 2006)



WHEREAS, Sanderson Farms Inc. (the “Corporation”) maintains the Sanderson Farms, Inc. and
Affiliates Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of the employees of the
Corporation and its participating affiliates;


WHEREAS, Section 12.1 of the Plan provides that the Corporation, through action of its Board of
Directors, may amend the Plan at any time; and


WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, effective August 1, 2006, the Plan shall be amended by adding
the following new Section 6.3(f), and redesignating former Section 6.3(f) as Section 6.3(g):




	 	(f)	 	If a Participant has a forfeiture under (c) or (d) above, the Forfeiture will be charged
(i) first, against the Participant’s Cash Account, and (ii) second, if any amount remains
to be forfeited, against the Participant’s Stock Account.




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment to the Sanderson Farms, Inc.
and Affiliates Employee Stock Ownership Plan on this 29th day of January, 2009.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ D. Michael Cockrell
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Treasurer & CFO
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31557-31558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15784]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and Centers; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:


[[Page 31558]]


    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and 
Centers.
    Date/Time: July 9-10, 1996, 8:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 375, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Mary Poats, Program Manager, Engineering 
Education and Centers Division, National Science Foundation, Room 
585, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning concept papers submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate concept papers submitted to the 
Combined Research-Curriculum Development Program.
    Reason for Closing: The concept papers being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b. (c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-15784 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Amendment to Employment Agreement- Rick Fehr



 Exhibit 10.39 
 November 30, 2008 
 The Employment Agreement dated September 25, 2007 between us and Rick Fehr is hereby amended as follows: 

The last sentence in the first paragraph under the section entitled “Severance Payments” is hereby amended as follows: 
 Such payments will be made 6 months after your separation from service from the Company, as defined in Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-1(h) and as
uniformly applied in accordance with such rules as shall be established by the Company from time to time.
Trial Day Date Session Copy / Original Notes

Day 3 8/31/2023 Afternoon only Copy

Day 4 9/12/2023 Morning and Afternoon Copy Afternoon copy only provide 18 pg. exerpt without witness testimony

Day 7 9/15/2023 Morning only Original Only provide 20 pg. exerpt without witness testimony

Day 17 10/12/2023 Morning only Copy

Day 19 10/17/2023 Afternoon only Copy

Day 22 10/20/2023 Morning only Copy

Day 23 10/24/2023 Morning only Copy

Day 24 10/25/2023 Morning and Afternoon Copy

Day 25 10/26/2023 Morning and Afternoon Copy

Day 26 10/27/2023 Morning and Afternoon Copy

Day 27 10/31/2023 Morning and Afternoon Copy

Day 28 11/1/2023 Morning and Afternoon Copy

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2014-1 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 1
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Chad Dodson Roofing, LLC, * From the County Court

at Law of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 22,574

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00281

- CV * November 14, 2014

Paula (Coots) Gutierrez

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion,

the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed

against Chad Dodson Roofing, LLC.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Jardine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Silverstar Mining
      Corp. for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Silverstar Mining Corp.                                                                  

Dated: August 14, 2008

| | */s/ John Jardine*                                         
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | John Jardine                                               
| | Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial
      Officer     
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting
| | Officer)                                                   
| | Silverstar Mining Corp.                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Silverstar
Mining Corp. and will be retained by Silverstar Mining Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

NO. 01-15-00593-CR

TROY XAVIER EVANS 

Appellant, 

On Appeal From the 174th

District Court of Harris County 

V. Trial Cause No. 1423548 

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

Appellee 

FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: 

 ANGELA CAMERON, attorney of record for Appellant in the above cause, 

would respectfully request the Court to grant her motion to extend time for file brief. 

In support of said motion, counsel would show unto the Court the following: 

I.

 This appeal lies from Appellant's conviction in The State of Texas v. Troy Xavier 

Evans Cause Number 1423548 in the 174th District Court of Harris County. Evans 

was found guilty of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to twenty-five (25) years 

confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice – Institutional Division. 

Notice of Appeal was timely filed. The brief is due on September 23, 2015. No prior 

extensions have been requested. 

ACCEPTED

01-15-00593-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/22/2015 10:02:01 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/22/2015 10:02:01 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
II.

Counsel will be unable to file the brief in this cause as has been completing the 

following tasks: 

1. Preparing and filing a brief in Erick Hernandez v. State of Texas, 14-15-

00209-CR which was filed on August 19, 2015.

2. Preparing and filing a brief in Willie Clarke v. State of Texas, 01-15-00547-

CR, 01-15-00548-CR, 01-15-00549-CR which was filed on September 4, 

2015.

3. Counsel had been doing extensive investigation into a possible Motion 

for New Trial in State of Texas v. Christopher Cavazos, Cause Numbers 

1402280 and 1443325 in the 184th District Court of Harris County. The 

deadline for filing a Motion for New Trial was September 9, 2015.

4. Preparing and filing a Petition for Discretionary Review in Lajuan Cecile 

Bailey v. State of Texas, Cause No. PD-1087-15 which was filed on 

September 21, 2015.

VI.

An extension of time is necessary so that the brief can be timely filed. This 

motion is not made for the purpose of delay. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this 

Honorable Court will grant this requested extension of time to file the Appellant's 

Brief in the above cause and extend the time for filing the brief for at least thirty (30) 

days.
Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Bunin

Chief Public Defender

/s/ Angela Cameron

Angela Cameron

State Bar No. 00788672

Harris County Public Defender’s Office

1201 Franklin 13th Floor 

Houston, Texas 77002

Tel: 713-368-0016

angela.cameron@pdo.hctx.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the 22nd day of September 2015 a copy of the foregoing instrument 

has been electronically served upon the State of Texas. 

/s/ Angela Cameron

ANGELA CAMERON
Exhibit 10.15


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT


pursuant to


THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.


[________] EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


The STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”),
dated as of [________________], by and between The Ryland Group, Inc. (the
“Corporation”), and [__________________] (the “Executive”), is amended to
comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 409A.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is amended as follows:


 


1.                                      Section 4, Cash
Dividend Equivalents, is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of
that Section:


 


“The Executive must be employed on a cash
dividend payment date to be eligible for the cash dividend payment described in
this Section 4.”


 


2.                                      Section 9, Dispute Resolution, is amended by adding the
following provisions to the end of that Section:


 


“The Executive shall be entitled to
reimbursement of the fees and expenses described under this Section 9
during the period commencing on the effective date of this Agreement and ending
on his or her death.  Any reimbursement
of fees under this Section 9 shall be made on or before the last day of
the year following the year in which the expense is incurred.  The amount of expenses eligible for
reimbursement during a year shall not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement
in any other year.  The right to
reimbursement under this Section is not subject to liquidation or exchange
for another benefit.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1
has been duly executed by the Corporation, to be effective as of [_______________________]
[insert the effective date of the Stock Unit Agreement, or, if later, insert “January 1,
2005”].


 


 


	
  ATTEST/WITNESS

  	
   

  	
  THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.
  

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  R. Chad
  Dreier 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer

  
	
  Print Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 31, 2014

No. 04-14-00313-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.H.,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-CI-15779

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Second Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Motion for Rehearing 

is GRANTED. The appellee’s response is due on August 11, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of getpokerrakeback.com (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Goertz, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
      19 th day of
      July, 2007.





/s/
      Steven Goertz





Chief
      Financial Officer
#### James MILLER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. 67352.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 14, 1995.

Deborah B. Wafer, Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL, J., and RONNIE L. WHITE, Special Judge.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).