alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1106 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the provision of medical 

and dental readiness services to certain members of the Selected Reserve 

and Individual Ready Reserve based on medical need, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself, Ms. LANDRIEU, and Mr. BURRIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the provision of medical and dental readiness services to certain 

members of the Selected Reserve and Individual Ready 

Reserve based on medical need, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Selected Reserve Con5 tinuum of Care Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1106 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PROVISION OF MEDICAL AND 

2 DENTAL READINESS SERVICES TO CERTAIN 

3 MEMBERS OF THE SELECTED RESERVE AND 

4 INDIVIDUAL READY RESERVE BASED ON 

5 MEDICAL NEED. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1074a(g)(1) of title 10, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘may provide’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘shall provide’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘if the Secretary determines’’ 

11 and inserting ‘‘, as applicable, if a qualified health 

12 care professional determines, based on the member’s 

13 most recent annual medical exam or annual dental 

14 exam, as the case may be,’’. 

15 (b) FUNDING.—Subject to applicable provisions of 

16 appropriations Acts, amounts available to the Department 

17 of Defense for Defense Health Program shall be available 

18 for the provision of medical and dental services under sec19 tion 1074a(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code, in ac20 cordance with the amendments made by subsection (a). 

21 (c) BUDGETING FOR HEALTH CARE.—In deter22 mining the amounts to be required for medical and dental 

23 readiness services for members of the Selected Reserve 

24 and the Individual Ready Reserve under section 

25 1074a(g)(1) of title 10, United States Code (as amended 

26 by subsection (a)), for purposes of the budget of the PresiVerDate Nov 24 2008 03:04 May 21, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1106.IS S1106

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 1106 IS

1 dent for fiscal years after fiscal year 2010, as submitted 

2 to Congress pursuant to section 1105 of title 31, United 

3 States Code, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

4 Health Affairs shall consult with appropriate officials hav5 ing responsibility for the administration of the reserve 

6 components of the Armed Forces, including the Chief of 

7 the National Guard Bureau with respect to the National 

8 Guard. 

9 (d) MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCREENING FOR READY

10 RESERVE MEMBERS ALERTED FOR MOBILIZATION.—Sec11 tion 1074a(f)(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amend12 ed by striking ‘‘may provide’’ and inserting ‘‘shall pro13 vide’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Exhibit32.2

 

 

Inconnection withthisReport on Form10-Qforthe three and nine monthsended June 30, 2017(the “Report”)ofPennantPark Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”),asfiled withthe SecuritiesandExchange Commissiononthe datehereof, I, Aviv Efrat, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplieswiththe requirementsof Section13(a)or15(d)ofthe SecuritiesExchange Act of1934, as amended;and

 

(2)  The informationcontainedinthe Report fairlypresents, inall material respects, the financial conditionandresultsof operationsoftheRegistrant.

 

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
| /s/ Aviv Efrat                             |
| Name: Aviv Efrat                           |
| Title:   Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:   August 7, 2017           |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

2 East Congress Street, Suite 1000

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 622-6900

Michael L. Piccarreta

State Bar No. 003962

Email: mlp@pd-law.com

Attorney for Defendant Andrew Padilla

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

6. Andrew Padilla,

 (Counts 1-51)

 

 Defendant.

NO. CR-18-00422-06-PHX-SPL (BSB)

NOTICE OF WAIVER OF PERSONAL 

APPEARANCE AT STATUS 

CONFERENCE

The defendant, Andrew Padilla, by and through his undersigned attorney, hereby

provides notice that he waives his right to be personally present at the upcoming status 

conference, set for April 23, 2019, at 2:30 p.m. See Rule 43(b)(3), Federal Rules of Criminal 

Procedure.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 12th day of April, 2018.

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

By: /s/ Michael L. Piccarreta

Michael L. Piccarreta

Attorney for Andrew Padilla

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 521 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 12th day of April, 2019, I electronically transmitted 

the foregoing to the Clerk of the Court via the CM/ECF system for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Reginald Jones: Reginald.Jones@usdoj.gov 

Peter S. Kozinets: Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov 

John Kucera: John.Kucera@usdoj.gov 

Margaret Perlmeter: Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

Kevin Rapp: Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov 

Andrew Stone: Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov 

Thomas Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com 

Paul Cambria: pcambira@lglaw.com 

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com 

Bruce Feder: bfeder@federlaw.com 

James Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com 

Michael D. Kimerer, mdk@kimerer.com 

Gary Lincenberg: glincenberg@birdmarella.com

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 521 Filed 04/12/19 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

TERRY M. HOWLEY,

Plaintiff,

Case Number 08-13976-BC

v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington

UNITED STATES PATENT AND 

TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________ /

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT SUA SPONTE

This matter is before the Court on a report and recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

Charles E. Binder on October 22, 2008. The magistrate judge recommended that the Court dismiss

Plaintiff Terry M. Howley’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

None of the parties to this action filed objections to the report and recommendation. A party’s

failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith

v. Detroit Federation of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the

failure to object to the magistrate judge’s report releases the Court from its duty to independently

review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation [Dkt.

# 6] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ complaint [Dkt. # 1] is DISMISSED.

s/Thomas L. Ludington 

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

Dated: November 7, 2008
-2-

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served

upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first

class U.S. mail on November 7, 2008

s/Tracy A. Jacobs 

TRACY A. JACOBS
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
 RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Axis Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Erickson, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: June 16, 2009
By:
/s/ James EricksonJames EricksonPrincipal Financial Officer
KROPF 

MOSELEY PLLC

1100 H. Street NW, Suite 1200

Washington, DC 20005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sara E. Kropf (pro hac vice)

KROPF MOSELEY PLLC

1100 H Street NW, Suite 1220

Washington DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 627-6900

Email: sara@kmlawfirm.com

Attorneys for Ernest Allen

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

v.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON 

BEHALF OF NON-PARTY 

GOVERNMENT WITNESS ERNEST 

ALLEN

Sara E. Kropf, of the law firm Kropf Moseley PLLC, hereby enters her appearance in 

this matter pro hac vice on behalf of non-party government witness Ernest Allen. All future 

correspondence, court documents and discovery in reference to this case will be accepted at 

the following address:

Sara E. Kropf 

Kropf Moseley PLLC 

1100 H Street NW, Suite 1200

Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 627-6900

sara@kmlawfirm.com

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 17th day of July 2023.

KROPF MOSELEY PLLC

/s/ Sara E. Kropf 

Sara E. Kropf (pro hac vice)

1100 H Street NW Suite 1200

Washington DC 20005

Attorneys for Ernest Allen

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1638 Filed 07/17/23 Page 1 of 2
2

KROPF 

MOSELEY PLLC

1100 H. Street NW, Suite 1200

Washington, DC 20005

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Certificate of Service

I certify that on this 17th day of July 2023, I electronically transmitted the foregoing 

document to the Office of the Clerk of the Court, using the CM/EFC System, for filing and 

for transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/EFC registrants on record.

/s/Rebecca Guiterman

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1638 Filed 07/17/23 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Robert C. Bowen, the Chief Executive Officer of ScientificLearning Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
**1.**The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and
**2.**The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: April 13, 2005     /s/ Robert C. Bowen    Robert C. Bowen    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  
This certification accompanies and is being “furnished” with this Periodic Report, shall not bedeemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the dateof this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7565

JAMAL MITCHELL,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

VINCENT B. LISSI, individually, and in his

official capacity as an agent or employee of

the Federal Bureau of Investigations; JOHN C.

BEVINGTON, individually, and in his official

capacity as an agent or employee of the

Federal Bureau of Investigations,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-1190-1)

Submitted: February 9, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Bernard Kernan, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendants in his action under

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Mitchell v. Lissi, No. CA-03-1190-1 (E.D.

Va. Aug. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 07- 30750 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. JER M AI N E D STAR K S D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he M i ddl e D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 3: 06- C R
- 167- 1 B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * T h e att orney a pp oi n t ed to represen t J e rm a i n e D . Starks ha s m ovedf or l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . Ca lif o rn ia , 386 U . S. 738 ( 196 7) . Starks ha s not f i l ed a response. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew o f th e re c o r da n dco u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D Jul y 14, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 07- 30750

2 e x c u s e df

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n dt h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED . S ee5 T H C IR . R . 42. 2.
#### Anna BILIC, Employee/Appellant, v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES, formerly Inmart Corporation, Employer, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 66206.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 20, 1994.

*765Ray B. Marglous, Clayton, for appellant.

Joseph Daigre, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Anna Bilie, appeals from a decision rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding appellant suffering from a five percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to the lumbar spine and a ten percent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to depression. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. As such, we affirm the Commission’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PETER LUKASAVITZ,

Defendant. 

 /

Case No. 08-CR-20499

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

On July 30, 2010, the court entered an order granting Defendant Peter

Lukasavitz additional time to file his memorandum in support of his motion to vacate

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On September 7, 2010, Defendant filed a request for an

additional extension of time. Defendant cites his lack of resources and other difficulties

experienced in researching and preparing his memorandum. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s request for extension of time [Dkt. # 30] is

GRANTED. Defendant shall file his memorandum in support of his motion to vacate by

December 15, 2010. The Government shall file its response January 26, 2011. The

reply, if any, is to be filed by March 2, 2011.

NO FURTHER EXTENSION SHALL BE GRANTED TO DEFENDANT.

S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 16, 2010
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\08-20499.LUKASAVITZ.OrderExtensionTime.wpd

2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, September 16, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOHN HAMILTON, JOHN HAMILTON

TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN L. HAMILTON RETAINED

ANNUITY TRUST, JOHN HAMILTON, JR.,

JEREMY HAMILTON, MICHAEL HAMILTON,

JO-BET, INC., d/b/a HENRY VIII SOUTH, THE

GARTER BELT, INC., d/b/a LEGG’S LOUNGE,

HAMILTON’S HENRY VIII SOUTH LOUNGE, INC., and

HAMILTON BOGART, INC., d/b/a BOGART’S JOINT,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 01-74698

STATE CASE

JENNIFER GRANHOLM, HONORABLE AVERN COHN

DANIEL GUSTAFSON, MAXINE PERRY,

PHILLIP ARTHURHULTZ, MICHIGAN LIQUOR

CONTROL COMMISSION, and NIDA R. SAMONA,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER

This is a case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs sued various defendants

claiming a violation of constitutional rights. The parties came before the Court on June

18, 2008 for a hearing on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This order

memorializes Court’s rulings at the hearing. It pertains only to the State Case.

1. Defendants Jennifer Granholm, Daniel Gustafson, Maxine Perry,

Phillip Arthurhultz, and Nida R. Samona are DISMISSED. The case

continues against only the Michigan Liquor Control Commission (MLCC).

2. The sole plaintiff in this case is Michael Hamilton. The sole claim is that

the MLCC violated his constitutional right of association under the 1st
Amendment and right to equal protection under the 14th Amendment in

issuing a liquor license to him, currently in escrow, which contains a

restriction that neither John L. Hamilton or Betty Hamilton can be involved

in the operation or management of a business attached with the license. 

Michael Hamilton seeks a form of mandamus and injunctive relief in the

form of issuance of a liquor license free of this restriction.

3. Plaintiff shall submit within twenty (20) days a freestanding copy of the

license at issue and one (1) case which provides authority for plaintiff’s

position that a federal court may order the form of injunctive relief

requested. The MLCC shall submit one (1) case in response within five

(5) days thereafter.

5. Plaintiff shall file within twenty (20) days a Statement of Material Facts, not

to exceed twenty (20) paragraphs, detailing the factual assertions which

show there is a genuine issue of material fact as to this claim.

6. Plaintiff shall also file within twenty (20) days a proposed verdict form.

7. Any objections to this order shall be filed within five (5) days.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 19, 2008 s/Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

David Eisenberg 602-237-5076 08/10/23

David Eisenberg PLC

3550 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1155 Phoenix AZ 85012

CR-18-422 Humetewa 07/27/2023 08/04/2023

USA v. Lacey Phoenix AZ

david@deisenbergplc.com

/s/ David Eisenberg

08/10/2023

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1692 Filed 08/10/23 Page 1 of 1