alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America 

v. 

Jose Ramon Jimenez-Anzaldo 

PETTY

JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE 

(For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987) 

No. 18-MJ-8085-PHX-DKD 

Alex Gonzalez (CJA) 

Attorney for Defendant 

USM#:90495-408 

THE DEFENDANT ENTERED A PLEA OF guilty on April 6, 2018 to the Information. 

ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT HAS ADJUDICATED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS GUILTY 

OF THE FOLLOWING OFFENSE(S): violating Title 8, U.S.C. §1325(a)(2) and Title 18, U.S.C. §2, 

Aiding and Abetting an Alien to Elude the Examination and Inspection of Immigration Officers of the 

United States, a Class B Misdemeanor offense, as charged in the Information. 

IT IS THE JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT THAT the defendant is committed to the custody of the 

Bureau of Prisons for a term of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY (120) DAYS, with credit for time 

served. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed on motion of the United States. 

CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES 

The defendant shall pay to the Clerk the following total criminal monetary penalties: 

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT: REMITTED FINE: WAIVED RESTITUTION: N/A 

On motion of the Government, the special assessment is REMITTED. 

The Court finds the defendant does not have the ability to pay a fine and orders the fine waived. 

THE COURT FINDS that you have been sentenced in accordance with the terms of the plea 

agreement and that you have waived your right to appeal and to collaterally attack this matter. The 

waiver has been knowingly and voluntarily made with a factual basis and with an understanding of the 

consequences of the waiver. 

The Court orders commitment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. 

Case 2:18-mj-08085-DKD Document 14 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 2
18-MJ-8085-PHX-DKD Page 2 of 2 

USA v. Jose Ramon Jimenez-Anzaldo 

Date of Imposition of Sentence: April 6, 2018

Dated this 6th day of April, 2018. 

RETURN 

I have executed this Judgment as follows: 

defendant delivered on to at 

 , the institution 

designated by the Bureau of Prisons with a certified copy of this judgment in a Criminal case. 

United States Marshal By: Deputy Marshal 

Case 2:18-mj-08085-DKD Document 14 Filed 04/06/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
 RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of Axis Technologies Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kipton Hirschbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date June 16, 2009
By:
/s/ Kipton HirschbachKipton HirschbachChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-87213, No. 333-43042, No. 333-91426, No. 333-109191, No. 333-126649, No.
333-144656) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2002 CEO
Option Plan, and Milestone Equity Incentive Plan of Scientific Learning
Corporation of our report dated March 10, 2008 with respect to the financial
statements and schedule of Scientific Learning Corporation included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP San Francisco,
California March 10, 2008
Confirmation of Performance Undertaking, dated as of December 22, 2008



 Exhibit 10(xx) 
 CONFIRMATION OF 
 PERFORMANCE UNDERTAKING 
 December 22, 2008 
 Reference is made to (a) the Performance Undertaking (the
“Performance Undertaking”), dated as of May 31, 2005, made by United Rentals, Inc. (the “Performance Guarantor”) in favor of United Rentals Receivables LLC II (the “SPV”); and (b) the
Purchase and Contribution Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated as of May 31, 2005, among United Rentals (North America), Inc., United Rentals Northwest, Inc., United Rentals Southeast, L.P., and United Equipment Rentals
Gulf, L.P., each as originators, the Performance Guarantor, as collection agent, and the SPV, as buyer. 
 The Performance Guarantor hereby
acknowledges that the Purchase Agreement is being amended and restated as the Amended and Restated Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of the date hereof, among United Rentals (North America), Inc. and United Rentals Northwest, Inc., each
as originators, the Performance Guarantor, as collection agent, and the SPV, as buyer (the “Restated Purchase Agreement”). 
 The Performance Guarantor hereby confirms that, after giving effect to the Restated Purchase Agreement, the Performance Undertaking continues in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, with the understanding that the term
“Purchase Agreement” used in the Performance Undertaking shall be deemed to be references to the Restated Purchase Agreement. 









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Confirmation of Performance Undertaking to be duly
executed by its authorized officer thereunto duly authorized, as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	UNITED RENTALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Irene Moshouris
	Name: 	 	Irene Moshouris
	Title:	 	Vice President and Treasurer
1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jane V., et al., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Motel 6 Operating LP, et al., 

Defendants. 

NO. CV-18-242-PHX-DMF

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 

This action has been assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 

Local Rule 3.7(b) of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Each 

party is required to execute and file within fourteen days of its appearance either a written 

consent to the exercise of authority by the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(c), or a 

written election to have the action reassigned to a district judge. Plaintiffs Jane V., John 

A., John E., Jane F., John D., John M., Jane N., and John W. appeared more than 

fourteen days ago, but has not yet filed the required election form. 

IT IS ORDERED that if Plaintiffs Jane V., John A., John E., Jane F., John D., 

John M., Jane N., and John W. fail to file the appropriate election form by 5:00 p.m. 

on Friday, February 23, 2018, Plaintiffs Jane V., John A., John E., Jane F., John 

D., John M., Jane N., and John W. shall appear1 before Judge G. Murray Snow of 

the Phoenix Division of this Court in Courtroom No. 602, 6th Floor, at 4:30 p.m. on 

March 12, 2018 and show good cause for the failure to comply with Local Rule 3.7(b). 

 

1 Incarcerated parties shall appear telephonically and shall make arrangements for such appearance in advance of the hearing. 

Case 2:18-cv-00242-DMF Document 4 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The hearing before the Judge will be automatically vacated and the party need not 

appear if the party files a completed election form by the 5:00 p.m. deadline set forth 

above. An additional copy of the election form is included with this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the assignment of this action to the Magistrate 

Judge remains in effect for all purposes pending completion of the election process. 

Involvement of Liaison Judge G. Murray Snow in this matter is limited to this show 

cause hearing, unless the magistrate judge assignment is ordered withdrawn pursuant to 

28 U. S. C. ' 636(b)(1)(A), at which time the case would be randomly reassigned to a 

district judge. 

 BRIAN D. KARTH

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

February 9, 2018 

s/ M.Pruneau

 By Deputy Clerk

 

Case 2:18-cv-00242-DMF Document 4 Filed 02/09/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15036]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5519-5]


National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and 
Technology; Reinvention Criteria Committee; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, PL 92-463, EPA gives 
notice of a two-day meeting of the National Advisory Council for 
Environmental Policy and Technology (NACEPT) Reinvention Criteria 
Committee (RCC). NACEPT provides advice and recommendations to the 
Administrator of EPA on a broad range of environmental policy issues. 
The RCC has been asked to identify criteria the Agency can use to 
measure the progress and success of specific reinvention projects and 
its overall reinvention efforts; and to identify criteria to promote 
opportunities for self-certification, similar to the concept used for 
pesticide registration. This meeting is being held to provide the EPA 
with perspectives from representatives of state and local government, 
academia, industry, and NGOs.

DATES: The two-day public meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 24, 
1996, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and on Thursday, July 25, 1996 from 9 a.m. 
to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Dupont Plaza Hotel, 1500 New 
Hampshire Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.
    Materials, or written comments, may be transmitted to the Committee 
through Gwendolyn Whitt, Designated Federal Official, NACEPT/RCC, U.S. 
EPA, Office of Cooperative Environmental Management (1601-F), 401 M 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gwendolyn Whitt, Designated Federal Official for the Reinvention 
Criteria Committee at 202-260-9484.

    Dated: May 30, 1996.
Gwendolyn C.L. Whitt,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 96-15036 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 108 

To prohibit the admission of an alien who was detained as an enemy combatant at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba unless the President determines that 

such admission is consistent with the national security of the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the admission of an alien who was detained 

as an enemy combatant at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba unless the President determines that such admission is 

consistent with the national security of the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection from 

5 Enemy Combatants Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 108 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ADMISSION OF ALIENS DETAINED 

2 AT GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA. 

3 (a) COVERED ALIEN DEFINED.—In this section, the 

4 term ‘‘covered alien’’ means an alien who was detained 

5 as an enemy combatant by the United States at Guanta6 namo Bay, Cuba. 

7 (b) PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION BY A COURT.—Sub8 ject to subsection (d), a court of the United States may 

9 not order the release or parole into the United States of 

10 a covered alien. 

11 (c) PROHIBITION ON ADMISSION BY THE SECRETARY

12 OF STATE OR THE SECRETARY HOMELAND SECURITY.— 

13 (1) VISA.—Subject to subsection (d), the Sec14 retary of State may not issue any visa to a covered 

15 alien that would permit the covered alien to enter, 

16 or be admitted to, the United States. 

17 (2) IMMIGRATION STATUS.—Subject to sub18 section (d), the Secretary of Homeland Security may 

19 not admit or provide any type of immigration status 

20 to a covered alien that would permit the covered 

21 alien to enter, or be admitted to, the United States. 

22 (d) WAIVER.—The President, in the sole discretion 

23 of the President, may waive a restriction described in sub24 section (b) or (c), in whole or in part, if the President 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 108 IS

1 determines that the waiver of such restriction is consistent 

2 with the national security of the United States. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      August 14, 2009 |   | /s/      DARRELL W. CAIN                                                                  |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |   | Darrell      W. Cain                                                                      |
|                       |   | Chief      Executive Officer, III to I International Maritime Solutions Cayman,      Inc. |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Derycz Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter
Derycz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Peter DeryczPeter
      DeryczChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
    Officer)November
      15, 2010
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A of ChromaDex Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended April 2, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas C. Varvaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes−Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date: August 26, 2016
 /s/ FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.
 Frank L. Jaksch Jr.
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 /s/ THOMAS C. VARVARO
 Thomas C. Varvaro
 Chief Financial Officer
  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.2








NET TALK.COM, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2010 of Net Talk.com, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guillermo Rodriguez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/ Guillermo RodriguezGuillermo RodriguezChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)Date: February 14, 2011






34
Exhibit 10.5
 EXHIBIT B  ADDENDUM #3
to
CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC TOLL PROCESSING AGREEMENT
 Corn Oil
 4th March
 Recitals
    ***
    
    Portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the
SEC.




---



##### 



Additional Feedstock Specifications
  2




---



##### 



Yield Requirement for Additional Feedstock
  Economic Adjustment to Agreement
   ***
    
    Portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the
SEC.  3




---



##### 



Trade Secret Protection
  4




---



##### 



Technology Rights, Ownership & Issues
     5




---



##### 



Privity of Contract
 Definition of Affiliate
 Grant of License
  6




---



##### 



Term of Addendum #3 30 March 10
 Improvements
     7




---



##### 



Right to Conduct Research
   8




---



##### 



9




---



##### 



Confidential Information
     10




---



##### 



11




---



##### 



12




---



##### 



13




---



##### 



Equitable Relief
 Other Terms, Provisions, and Language Unchanged
 Conflict of Terms
  14




---



##### 



Survival
  CENTRAL IOWA ENERGY, LLC
    
    
    
    REG MARKETING &
LOGISTICS GROUP, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ James Johnston

Name: James Johnston
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Nile D. Ramsbottom

Name: Nile D. RamsbottomTitle:   Chairman
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:   President
  15




---



##### 



RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Nile D. Ramsbottom

Name: Nile D. RamsbottomTitle:   President
  16




---



##### 



Free Fatty Acid
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Insoluble
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Color (FAC(as Olecic)
    
    
    Moisture
    
    
    Impurities
    
    
    Total MIU
    
    
    Scale)Analytical MethodAOCS Ca 5a-40
    
    
    AOCS Ca 2c-25
    
    
    AOCS Ca 3a-46
    
    
    
    
    
    
    AOCS Cc 13a-43Feedstock TypeDDG Corn Oil
    
    < 15
    
    
    < 1.0
    
    
    < 0.5
    
    
    < 2.5
    
    
    Typical
  17
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1182 

To amend the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 to eliminate the 

offset in per country numerical level required under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2009 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Chinese Student Protection Act of 1992 to 

eliminate the offset in per country numerical level required under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF OFFSET IN PER COUNTRY NU4 MERICAL LEVEL. 

5 Section 2 of the Chinese Student Protection Act of 

6 1992 (8 U.S.C. 1255 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘subsection 

8 (e)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (d)’’; 

9 (2) by striking subsection (d); and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1182 IS

1 (3) by redesignating subsection (e) as sub2 section (d). 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CASE NO: 08-20517-03

v. DISTRICT JUDGE THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES E. BINDER

AUGUSTIN MORALES-PEREZ,

Defendant.

/

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT, FINDINGS AND 

RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

I. REPORT AND FINDINGS

All parties having signed a consent, on April 21, 2009, this Defendant was referred to

the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1(B) and 636(b)(3) for the

purpose of receiving Defendant’s offer of a plea of guilty. The Defendant, along with counsel,

appeared before me on April 21, 2009. In open court I examined the Defendant under oath,

confirmed the Defendant’s consent, and then advised and questioned the Defendant regarding

each of the inquiries prescribed by Rule 11(b) of the FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL

PROCEDURE. Based upon the Defendant’s answers and demeanor, I HEREBY FIND 1) that

the Defendant is competent to tender a plea, 2) that Defendant’s plea was knowingly,

intelligently made, and 3) that the offense to which he pled is supported by an independent

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of the offense. Therefore, I have ordered

the preparation of a presentence investigation report.

Case 1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB ECF No. 94, PageID.285 Filed 04/22/09 Page 1 of 2
II. RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS RECOMMENDED that subject to the Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c) of the FEDERAL RULES OF

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed.

III. REVIEW

The parties to this action may object to and seek review of this Report and

Recommendation within ten (10) days of service of a copy hereof as provided for in 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of

appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed.2d 435 (1985); Frontier Ins.

Co. v. Blaty, 454 F.3d 590, 596 (6th Cir. 2006); United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984

(6th Cir. 2005). The parties are advised that making some objections, but failing to raise

others, will not preserve all the objections a party may have to this Report and

Recommendation. McClanahan v. Comm’r of Social Security, 474 F.3d 830, 837 (6th Cir.

2006); Frontier Ins. Co., 454 F.3d at 596-97. Pursuant to E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d)(2), a copy of

any objections is to be served upon this Magistrate Judge.

 s/ Charles` E Binder 

CHARLES E. BINDER 

Dated: April 22, 2009 United States Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this Report and Recommendation was electronically filed this date, electronically

served on Shane Waller and Robert Betts, and served on District Judge Ludington in the traditional manner.

Date: April 22, 2009 By s/Jean L. Broucek 

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Binder

Case 1:08-cr-20517-TLL-CEB ECF No. 94, PageID.286 Filed 04/22/09 Page 2 of 2