alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
(the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











/s/
James B. Wiegand


James B.
Wiegand


Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


December
15, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Geostar Mineral Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Andriy Protskiv, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 17thday of July, 2007.

ANDRIY PROTSKIVAndriy ProtskivChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer












































---
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:17-cv-04630-GMS Document 6 Filed 12/14/17 Page 7 of 7
EXHIBIT 32.1



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Stephen Kelly, Chief Executive Officer of Chordiant Software, Inc. (the Company), and Michael Shannahan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



1.  The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, and to which this Certification is
attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2.  The information contained in the Annual Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.



This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Chordiant Software, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



Dated: March 8, 2004



/s/    STEPHEN KELLYStephen Kelly, Chief Executive Officer/s/    MICHAEL J. SHANNAHANMichael J. Shannahan, Chief Financial Officer
October 15, 2023

Sent via email to:

The Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Court- Pheonix Division

Sandra Day O'Connor U. S. Courthouse

401 W. Jefferson Strett, SPC 625

Courtroom 605

Phoenix, AZ 85004 

humetewa_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov 

Criminal Justice Act (CJA) Unit- Phoenix Division 

cja_evoucher@azd.uscourts.gov 

Re: USA v. Michael Lacey, et al., CR18-00422-PHX-DJH 

Letter of Explanation for Transcript Request 

Your Honor:

CJA Defense counsel is respectfully requesting the daily transcripts for all government 

witnesses beginning October 11, 2023, through October 13, 2023. I am requesting a 14 dayturnaround. The reason for the expeditious turnaround time is due to the numerous 

evidentiary rulings and guidance by the Court regarding subject matters that are or are not

permissable. The transcripts are necessary for effective cross-examination within the 

evidentiary bounds set by this Court. 

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Eric W. Kessler

EWK/jk

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1862-1 Filed 10/17/23 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.31






Baldwin Technology Company, Inc.

2 Trap Falls Road

Suite 402

Shelton, CT 06484

Tel: 203-402-1000

Fax: 203-402-5500




January 29, 2009




Mr. Shaun J. Kilfoyle

4300 West 93rd Street

Prairie Village, KS 66207




Dear Shaun:



Pursuant to Paragraph 11 of the agreement dated December 19, 2008 (the “Agreement”), which sets
forth the terms of your employment with Baldwin Technology Company, Inc. (the “Company”), and in
accordance with a letter agreement between you and the Company dated January 13, 2009 wherein you
agreed to reduce your annual base salary by ten (10%) percent, the Agreement is hereby amended,
effective February 1, 2009, as follows:





	 	1.	 	Paragraph 2.A is amended to provide for an annual base salary of one hundred eighty
nine thousand six hundred forty one dollars ($189,641).
	 
	 	2.	 	Notwithstanding the foregoing, any payments that may become due to you in accordance
with Paragraph 2.D or Paragraph 5 of the Agreement, and any other calculations which rely
on your annual base salary shall continue to be calculated as if your annual base salary
was two hundred ten thousand seven hundred twelve dollars ($210,712).




As so amended by this letter agreement, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,

BALDWIN TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	/s/ Karl S. Puehringer	 	 
	 

	 	 

Karl S. Puehringer
	 	 
	 

	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED	 	 
	 
	/s/ Shaun J. Kilfoyle	 	 
	 	 	 
	Shaun J. Kilfoyle	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:
	 	January 29, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MICHAEL BAILEY

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

RAQUEL ARELLANO

Assistant United States Attorney

AZ State Bar No.: 011796

CHRISTINE A. MELTON 

Assistant United States Attorney

AZ State Bar No.: 021649

United States Courthouse

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800

Tucson, Arizona 85701

raquel.arellano@usdoj.gov

christine.melton@usdoj.gov Telephone: (520) 620-7300

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Robert Francis Krebs,

 Defendant.

CR 18-00263-TUC-JGZ (JR)

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR 

STATUS CONFERENCE (UNOPPOSED)

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its attorneys undersigned, 

hereby requests the District Court to set a status conference for the following reasons:

• On August 29, 2019, the defendant filed his Notice of Insanity Defense. 

(Doc. 82.)

• The government thereafter filed a Motion for Pretrial Mental Health 

Examination for the Determination of the Existence of Insanity at the Time 

of the Offense. (Doc. 88.) A status conference was held in which the 

defendant affirmed his intent to pursue an insanity defense. (Doc. 92.) The 

government’s motion was granted, and the evaluation was ordered by 

Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Rateau on September 20, 2019. (Docs. 92, 93.) 

• On October 21, 2019, defense counsel filed a Motion to Withdraw Insanity 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 105 Filed 01/09/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defense over the defendant’s objection. (Doc. 99.)

• On November 20, 2019, a status conference was held before District Court 

Judge Jennifer G. Zipps. After ex-parte discussion with defendant and his 

counsel, the Court denied the Motion to Withdraw the Insanity Defense. 

(Doc. 103.) The Court affirmed the previously ordered psychiatric 

evaluation. (Id.) 

• The defendant’s psychiatric evaluation was scheduled to take place on 

December 27, 2019, with Dr. Bennet Blum in Tucson, Arizona. On 

December 27, 2019, the defendant was transported to Dr. Blum’s office. At 

that time, he refused to participate in any evaluation, and was not 

interviewed.

It is the government’s understanding that the defendant has not communicated any 

intent to withdraw the insanity defense. The government requests that the Court set a status 

conference to resolve these impending issues. Leo Costales, counsel for the defendant, has 

no objection to this request for a status conference. If possible, undersigned counsel 

respectfully requests that the status conference not be set on a Friday. 

Respectfully submitted this 9th day of January, 2020.

MICHAEL BAILEY 

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

S/ Raquel Arellano 

RAQUEL ARELLANO

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by other means this 9th day of January, 2020, to:

Jorge Leonardo Costales, Esq. Gregory Jon Berger, Esq.

Attorneys for the Defendant 

Case 4:18-cr-00263-JGZ-JR Document 105 Filed 01/09/20 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Barbara J. ALLEN a/k/a Barbara McDonald, Defendant/Appellant.

No. 66178.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

April 18, 1995.

Theodore G. Pashos, St. Louis, for appellant.

Leneigha Downs, Union, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals following her conviction in a court-tried case of failing to place her vehicle not in motion as near the right-hand side of the road as practicable in violation of § 304.015 RSMo 1994. A two hundred dollar fine was imposed, plus costs. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no prejudicial error warranting reversal. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opin*723ion. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Amber Hill, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, I, Julia J. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 15, 2007 AMBER HILL, INC. By: /s/ Julia J. Alexander Julia J. Alexander  {A0038801.DOC}  Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Amber Hill, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, I, Hilary L. Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:  May 15, 2007 AMBER HILL, INC. By: /s/ Hilary L. Davis Hilary L. Davis    {A0038801.DOC}
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1128 

To authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the 

Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of 

participation in the testing of nuclear weapons or under other circumstances. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing 

radiation as a result of participation in the testing of 

nuclear weapons or under other circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Serv5 ice Medal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ATOMIC VETERANS SERVICE MEDAL. 

7 (a) SERVICE MEDAL REQUIRED.—The Secretary of 

8 Defense shall design and produce a military service medal, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1128 IS

1 to be known as the ‘‘Atomic Veterans Service Medal’’, to 

2 honor retired and former members of the Armed Forces 

3 who are radiation-exposed veterans (as such term is de4 fined in section 1112(c)(3) of title 38, United States 

5 Code). 

6 (b) DISTRIBUTION OF MEDAL.— 

7 (1) ISSUANCE TO RETIRED AND FORMER MEM8 BERS.—At the request of a radiation-exposed vet9 eran, the Secretary of Defense shall issue the Atom10 ic Veterans Service Medal to the veteran. 

11 (2) ISSUANCE TO NEXT-OF-KIN.—In the case of 

12 a radiation-exposed veteran who is deceased, the 

13 Secretary may provide for issuance of the Atomic 

14 Veterans Service Medal to the next-of-kin of the per15 son. 

16 (3) APPLICATION.—The Secretary shall prepare 

17 and disseminate as appropriate an application by 

18 which radiation-exposed veterans and their next-of19 kin may apply to receive the Atomic Veterans Serv20 ice Medal. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      15, 2010 | /s/ JASON      M. MORTON                                   |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | Jason      M. Morton                                            |
|                                    | Chief      Financial Officer,                                   |
|                                    | III      to I International MaritimeSolutions      Cayman, Inc. |

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
(the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.











/s/ James B.
Wiegand


James B.
Wiegand


Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


April 13,
2009
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 23, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00410-CV DARRELL PERKINS, Appellant V. VITRUVIAN WEST 2 LLC DBA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01514-C MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Nowell, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Nowell Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record , we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by July 27, 2024. By postcard dated July 30, 2024, we info rmed appellant his brief was overdue and directed appellant to file a brief with in ten days. We ca utioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a br ief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the stat us of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

240410F.P05 /Erin A. Nowell / ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT DARRELL PERKINS, Appellant
No. 05-24-00410-CV V. VITRUVIAN WEST 2 LLC DBA, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01514- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. Justices Molberg and Kennedy participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered August 23, 2024
#### Martin, Appellant, *v.*Borough of West Liberty.

*Trespass*— Real *property*— Railroads—Borough *street*— Unau*thorized entry*— Damages—Gonclusiveness *of verdict*— Appeals.

The verdict of a jury in favor of a defendant in an action of trespass against a borough to recover damages for- injury to real property will not be reversed where the assignments of error present no question of law and the-question of fact at the trial was whether the plaintiff had suffered a special injury by the depreciation of his property due to»the construction of a railroad below the natural grade across a borough street where it appeared that the borough had given its consent for such construction to pass over the street in question at grade, that no official grade had been established as to the street in question and that the company opened a new street on its own land in substitution for the one destroyed.

Argued November 3, 1913.

Appeal, No. 245, Oct. T., 1913, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Fourth Term, 1907, No. 195, on verdict for defendant in case of John A. Martin v. Borough of West Liberty.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter and Elkin, JJ.

Affirmed.

*501Trespass to recover damages for injury to real property. Before Evans, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

The jury found a verdict for defendant upon which judgment was entered. Plaintiff appealed.

*Thomas L. Kane,*for appellant.

*Harry Diamond,*with him *Charles A.*O’Brien, for appellee.

January 5, 1914:

Per Curiam,

The assignments of error present no question of law for our consideration. The Borough of West Liberty gave its consent to the West Side Belt Railroad Company to enter it on lines indicated in the ordinance and to pass over certain streets at grade. The company in constructing its road crossed below the natural grade, a street on which the plaintiff’s property was situated, no official grade having been established and in so doing deprived the plaintiff , of the meansb-of access he had before enjoyed to a part of the street. The location of the road at this place was a permanent one and thá company opened a new street on its own land in substitution for the one destroyed. The action was for the recovery of damages from the borough for permitting the unauthorized act of the company. The question of fact at the trial was whether the plaintiff had suffered a special injury by the depreciation of his property.' The jury under clear and adequate instructions found that he had not.

The judgment is affirmed:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-DJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the United States’ Motion for Leave to File a Surreply 

to Defendants’ Motion to Partially Vacate Seizure Warrants and Release Funds (Doc. 

1366), and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the United States’ Motion for Leave to File 

a Surreply.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1397-1 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 33657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Part 301

[TD 8671]
RIN 1545-AS83


Taxpayer Identifying Numbers (TINs); Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to final regulations [TD 
8671] which were published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, May 
29, 1996 (61 FR 26788). The final regulations relate to requirements 
for furnishing a taxpayer identifying number on returns, statements or 
other documents.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 29, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilo A. Hester, (202) 874-1490 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of these corrections are 
under section 6109 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, TD 8671 contains errors that are in need of 
correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of final regulations which are the 
subject of FR Doc. 96-13397 is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 26790, column 1, in amendatory instruction ``Par 2.'', 
line 1, the language ``Section Sec. 301.6109-1 is'' is corrected to 
read ``Section 301.6109-1 is''.


Sec. 301.6109-1  [Corrected]

    2. On page 26791, columns 1 and 2, Sec. 301.6109-1(d)(3)(iv)(A)(1) 
is corrected to read as follows:


Sec. 301.6109-1  Identifying numbers.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (iv) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (1) Procedures for providing Form SS-4 and Form W-7, or such other 
necessary form to applicants for obtaining a taxpayer identifying 
number;
* * * * *
    3. On page 26792, column 2, Sec. 301.6109-1(h)(1), line 8, the 
language ``identification numbers apply after May'' is corrected to 
read ``identification numbers apply on and after May''.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 96-16172 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U