alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-85829 and 333-51980) of SilverStream  Software,  Inc. and
Form S-3 (Nos.  333-45044 and 333-54854) of SilverStream  Software,  Inc. and in
the related  prospectus'  of our report dated January 30, 2001,  with respect to
the  consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of SilverStream  Software,
Inc.  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2000.




                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 13, 2001



                                      S-2
---

EXHIBIT 8

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES (as at June 17, 2005)

|Name                                        | Jurisdiction     | Business                                | % of     
|------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | --------------------------------------- | ---------
|                                            |                  |                                         | Ownership
|Source Rock Holdings Limited                | New Zealand      | Holding company                         | 100%     
|Austral Pacific Energy (NZ) Limited [1]     | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Millennium Oil & Gas Limited                | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Rata Energy Limited                         | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Ngatoro Energy Limited (in liquidation) [2] | New Zealand      | Shell company                           | 100%     
|Totara Energy Limited                       | New Zealand      | Shell company                           | 100%     
|Kanuka Energy Limited [3]                   | New Zealand      | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Odyssey International Pty Limited           | Australia        | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Indo-Pacific Energy Australia Pty Limited   | Australia        | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Trans-Orient Petroleum (Aust) Pty Limited   | Australia        | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|ZOCA 96-16 Pty Limited                      | Australia        | Shell company                           | 100%     
|Trans-Orient Petroleum (PNG) Limited        | Papua New Guinea | Oil and gas exploration and development | 100%     
|Indo-Pacific Energy (PNG) Limited [4]       | Papua New Guinea | Shell company                           | 100%     
|Rockwell Energy Limited [5]                 | Papua New Guinea | Shell company                           | 50%      

|[1] | Name changed in January 2004, from Indo-Pacific Energy (NZ) Limited.                                                  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|[2] | Ngatoro Energy Limited was placed into voluntarily liquidation on October
      7, 2004.                              
|[3] | Incorporated November 25, 2004                                                                                        
|[4] | Indo-Pacific Energy (PNG) Limited was amalgamated with Trans-Orient Petroleum
      (PNG) Limited on October 25, 2004.
|[5] | Incorporated August 24, 2004                                                                                          

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board\1\
[STB Docket No. AB-449 (Sub-No. 2)]

Western Kentucky Railway, L.L.C.--Abandonment--Between Blackford 
and Princeton, KY
    The Board has issued a certificate authorizing Western Kentucky 
Railway, L.L.C. (WKR), to abandon its 34.75-mile line between milepost 
JE62.5 at Blackford and milepost JE97.25 at Princeton, in Crittenden 
and Caldwell Counties, KY, subject to the standard employee protective 
conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The ICC Termination Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-88, 109 
Stat. 803, which was enacted on December 29, 1995, and took effect 
on January 1, 1996, abolished the Interstate Commerce Commission and 
transferred certain functions to the Surface Transportation Board 
(Board). This notice relates to functions that are subject to Board 
jurisdiction pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10903.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The abandonment certificate will become effective on July 27, 1996, 
unless within 15 days after publication of this notice, the Board finds 
that: (1) a financially responsible person has offered financial 
assistance (through subsidy or purchase) to enable rail service to be 
continued.
    Requests for public use conditions must be filed with the Board and 
WKR no later than July 8, 1996.
    Any offers of financial assistance must also be filed with the 
Board and WKR no later than July 8, 1996. The offer, referring to 
Docket No. AB-449 (Sub-No. 2), must be addressed to: (1) Surface 
Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 
1201 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20423; and (2) Patricia E. 
Kolesar, Slover and Loftus, 1224 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 
20036. The following notation must be typed in bold face on the lower 
left-hand corner of the envelope containing the offer: ``Office of 
Proceedings, AB-OFA''. Any offer previously made must be remade within 
this 10-day period.
    Information and procedures regarding financial assistance for 
continued rail service are contained in 49 U.S.C. 10903 and 49 CFR 
1152.27. Requests for public use conditions must conform with 49 CFR 
1152.28(a)(2). Additional information is contained in the Board's 
decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, call, or 
pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services at (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: June 20, 1996.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16410 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
EXHIBIT 8.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF CHINA SOUTHERN AIRLINES COMPANY
LIMITED



The particulars of the Company’s principal
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:



|Name of Company                                            | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|                                                           |                              
|Shantou Airlines Company Limited                           | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Chongqing Airlines Company Limited                         | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Zhuhai Airlines Company Limited                            | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Xiamen Airlines Company Limited                            | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Guizhou Airlines Company Limited                           | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Nan Lung International Freight Limited                     | HK                           
|                                                           |                              
|Guangzhou Baiyun International Logistic Company Limited    | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|China Southern Airlines Group Air Catering Company Limited | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Guangzhou Nanland Air Catering Company Limited             | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Xinjiang Civil Aviation Property Management Limited        | PRC                          
|                                                           |                              
|Beijing Southern Airlines Ground Services Company Limited  | PRC
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Derycz Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard
      McKilligan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Richard McKilliganRichard
                McKilliganChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                19, 2008
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 93-5703 KEVIN J. DAUGHTRY, Defendant-Appellant. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. (S. Ct. No. 94-9473) Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: August 7, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge Wilkins wrote the opinion, in which Judge Widener and Judge Williams joined.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL John Frank Hardaway, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.J. Preston Strom, Jr., United States Attorney, Dean Arthur Eichelberger, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION WILKINS, Circuit Judge: Kevin J. Daughtry's appeal of his conviction for knowingly and willfully making false statements in a matter within the jurisdictionof a department of the United States, see18 U.S.C.A. § 1001 (West 1976), is once again before this court. In our initial decision, we affirmed Daughtry's conviction, concluding that the district court did not err in failing to instruct the jury that it must find that he acted with an intent to disobey or disregard the law in order to convict him of violating § 1001. United States v. Daughtry , 48 F.3d 829 (4th Cir. 1995). But, while his petition for a writ of certiorari was pending, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Gaudin , 115 S. Ct. 2310 (1995). Thereafter, the Court v acated our decision and remanded for reconsideration in light of Gaudin . Daughtry v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 510 (1995). We conclude that the Gaudin decision provides no basis for reconsideration of the issues addressed in our original decision. Gaudin held only that in prosecutions for violations of§ 1001, the element of materiality must be submitted to the jury. See Gaudin , 115 S. Ct. at2320. In contrast, our prior decision rejected Daughtry's sole argument that the district court had erred in refusing to charge the jury that it must find that he acted with an intent to disobey or disregard the law in order to have acted willfully within the meaning of § 1001. See Daughtry , 48 F.3d at 831-32. Therefore, we continue to reject Daughtry's argument for the reasons fully set forth in our previous opinion. See id. Nevertheless, we now vacate Daughtry's conviction and remand for further proceedings. The record indicates unmistakably that the district court instructed the jury that the question of materiality of the statement was an issue for the court, not the jury, and further charged the jury that the statement was material. Although this charge was correct when given, see, e.g. , United States v. Arch Trading Co. , 987 F.2d 1087, 1095 (4th Cir. 1993), as the Government now concedes, it is indisputably erroneous in light of Gaudin

.We vacate Daughtry's conviction and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
VACATED AND REMANDED
2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT  21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1.       Liberty Acquisition Corporation, a Tennessee corporation and wholly
         owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

2.       Special Omega Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation and
         wholly owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

3.       Pentegra Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned
         subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

4.       Edge Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and wholly
         owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.

5.       TW Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and wholly
         owned subsidiary of iLinc Communications, Inc.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00123

- CR

RICHARD SHIRLEY RAWL INSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COUR T NO. 6 OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND J UDGMENT

----------

We have considered a ppellant = s “ Amended Motion To Withdraw Notice Of

Appeal. ” The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate

procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been

delivered before w e received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R . App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: April 1 9 , 2012
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 294-1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 294-1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 294-1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 294-1 Filed 09/04/18 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Schlombs, certify that:

1.    have reviewed this quarterly report of Pacific Goldrim Resources, Inc.,

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)  	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition rules contained in SEC Release No. 33-8238;

c)  	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)  	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	I  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);
 a)	all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design of operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

b) 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other  employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	April 5, 2007				

JASON SCHLOMBS	 			Jason SchlombsPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: November 14, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets, Daniel Boyle, Joseph Bozdech

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg, 

Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant Padilla, present; Joy M. 

Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 32):

(8:55 a.m. Court is informed that the Jury has a written inquiry. 9:20 a.m. Jury resumes deliberations.)

9:45 a.m. Court reconvenes. Jury inquiry and response discussed, and will be provided to the Jury as 

set forth on the record. 10:06 a.m. Recess.

(10:08 a.m. Jury provided with response to their written inquiry. 10:31 a.m. Recess. 10:50 a.m. Jury 

resumes deliberations. 11:59 a.m. Recess. 1:08 p.m. Jury resumes deliberations. 2:07 p.m. Court is 

informed that the Jury has two written inquires.)

2:50 p.m. Court reconvenes. Jury inquiries and responses discussed. 3:09 p.m. Recess. 

3:16 p.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion re: responses to the Jury’s inquires. 3:25 p.m. Recess.

3:41 p.m. Court reconvenes. 3:42 p.m. Jury present. Jury instructed further with Allen Charge. 3:45 

p.m. Jury exits courtroom to resume deliberations. Court will proceed to the Evidentiary Hearing. For 

the reasons stated, IT IS ORDERED denying the Motion to Preclude Statements (Doc. 1970) as moot.

3:57 p.m. Quoc Thai sworn and examined. 4:16 p.m. Cross-Examination by Mr. Lincenberg. 4:48 p.m. 

Recess. Court will reconvene on Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

(4:15 p.m. Jury in recess and will reconvene on Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.) 

Court Reporter Hilda Lopez

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 9:45 AM

Stop: 4:48 PM

Total: 1hr 56min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1971 Filed 11/14/23 Page 1 of 1
Interim Deciaion *1607

Mi=Ea of CBECING In Deportation Proceedings A-15901019 Decided by Board Tithe 28, 1966Motion to reopen deportation proceedings to permit application for classification as a refugee under the proviso to section 203(a) (T), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended by P.L. 59-236, and for adjustment of status pursuant to section 245 of the Act, is denied since a record of permanentresidence as a refugee under section 203(a) (7) can be created only in accordance with the procedures established for section 245 and respondent, a crewman, is statutorily ineligible for the benefits of section 246. CHABas:Order: Act of 1952--Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2)]—Nonimmigrant crewman—Remained longer than permitted. Respondent, a 36-year-old married male, native and citizen of China, admitted on August 27, 1963 as a nonimmigrant crewman, has remained longer than authorized. On January 27, 1964 he was found deportable on the ground stated ill the caption and granted

-voluntary departure. On March 11, 1966, after the time granted to him for departure had expired, respondent submitted a motion to the special inquiry officer to reopen proceedings. Appeal from 'the special inquiry officer's denial (March 15, 1966) is now before us. The respondent sought reopening' of proceedings so that he could .establish that he was a refugee under section 203(a) (T) of.the Act. Submitted with the motion was an application for classification as ;a refugee and an application for status as & permanent resident 'under section 245 of the Act. Li denying the application, the specialinquiry officer ruled that a record of permanent residence as .a refugee could be created under section 203(a) (7) of the Aet only under the procedures established for section 245 of the Act, that section .245 of the Act makes a seaman ineligible for adjustment of status, and that the respondent, therefore, cannot receive an adjustment as a refugee. counsel's contention is that a refugee in the United 689

### Interim Decision #1607 States should be permitted to 

### adjust his status under section 203(a) (7) of the Act
-without regard to the qualifications set up for an applicant under section 245 

### of the Act. We are bound by the regulation. It requires an applicant fdr refugee status to meet the requirements of 8 OM 20 (see Tai Hui v. Evenly, 

### IT.S.D.C., S.D.N.Y., 66 Oiv. 816, May 4, 1966, 

### appeal noted). Respondent
. is not eligible under section 245 of the Act. The appeal must be dismissed. ORDER: • It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

690 .
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SavWatt USA, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Isaac H. Sutton,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: August 23, 2010                     /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)