alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

#### ** **

#### **SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

 

This Certificate is beingdelivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (MailFraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Codeand shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

 

The undersigned, who are theChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Behringer HarvardOpportunity REIT II, Inc. (the “Company”), each hereby certify as follows:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this 14th day ofNovember, 2008.

 

 
|   | /s/ Robert S. Aisner    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Robert S. Aisner        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Gary S. Bresky      |
|   | Gary S. Bresky          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will beretained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced BioMedical Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
I, Wang Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.




Dated
      this 16th
      day of March, 2009./s/ Wang Hui
                Wang
      Hui, Director and Chief Executive
Officer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Douglas Haig, 

Defendant. 

No. 18-00105MJ 

ORDER 

 

 Defendant has filed a fourth motion to continue the status hearing regarding the 

preliminary hearing, which was originally scheduled or February 15, 2018. (Doc. 2 

(setting status hearing for February 15, 2018), Doc. 9 (first motion to continue staus 

hearing, filed February 13, 2018), Doc. 16, (second motion to continue status hearing, 

filed March 7, 2017), Doc. 18 (third motion to continue status hearing, filed April 12, 

2018), and Doc. 20 (fourth motion to continue status hearing, filed May 14, 2018).) The 

status hearing is currently set for May 21, 2018, and Defendant requests another 

continuance of 30 days for the status hearing. (Doc. 20.) As asserted in his earlier 

motions, Defendant again states that he requires additional time to prepare for the status 

hearing because the parties are still awaiting the results of additional forensic 

examinations and reports, which have great significance to the future hearings scheduled 

in the case and to a potential pre-indictment resolution. (Id.) Defendant also states that 

he expects excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(B)(i) may 

result from the motion and any order based on the motion. (Id.) 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 Based on Defendant’s representations, the Court finds that the ends of justice 

served by allowing Defendant additional time to obtain important forensic reports, and 

review those reports in preparation for future hearings, outweigh the best interest of the 

public and Defendant in a speedy trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The Court finds 

that denying the motion for a continuance would deny counsel for Defendant the 

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue the May 21, 

2018 Status Hearing (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. The status hearing currently set for May 

21, 2018 is continued to June 21, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Bridget S. 

Bade, Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington Street, Phoenix, 

Arizona 85003, Courtroom 304. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under Title 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3161(h)______ will commence on _______for a total of ______days. 

 Dated this 15th day of May, 2018.
EX-10.(L)





Exhibit (10)(l)


Amendment


to the
Deferred Salary
Savings Plan

(Amended and Restated as of December 1, 2007)


Whereas, CMS Energy Corporation maintains the Deferred Salary Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and



Whereas, the Board of Directors of CMS Energy Corporation has authorized Officers of the Company
to modify the Plan to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 409A) and
as advisable to reflect guidance under Section 409A; and



Whereas, under the applicable Section 409A regulations the Plan may either accept the default
standard for determining when a Separation from Service has occurred or it may adopt prior to a
standard of up to 49% of the average level of services performed over the prior 36 month period
of time; and



Whereas, legal counsel, human resources and the tax department recommend adoption of a 45%
standard to provide a reasonable basis for complying with the Section 409A requirement.



Now Therefore, The definition of Separation from Service in Section 1.1 of the Plan is amended
effective to read as follows:




	 	 	 
	“Separation from
Service”

	 	Means the Employee retires or otherwise has a separation from service
from the company as defined under Code Section 409A and any applicable
regulations. The Plan Administrator will determine, consistent with
the requirements of Code Section 409A and any applicable regulations,
to what extent a person on a leave of absence, including on paid sick
leave pursuant to Company policy, has incurred a Separation from
Service. Notwithstanding the above, a Separation from Service will
occur consistent with the requirement of Code Section 409A when it is
reasonably anticipated that the future level of bona fide services
provided by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an independent
contractor) will be no more than 45% of the average level of bona fide
services performed by the Employee (whether as an employee or as an
independent contractor) over the immediately preceding 36 month period
(or the full period of services, if less than 36 months).





1








 





	 	 	 
	Signed this 21 day of December, 2008.
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	CMS Energy Corporation:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ John M. Butler
 

John M. Butler
	 	 
	Senior Vice President — Human Resources and Administrative Services
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Attest:
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	/s/ Catherine M. Reynolds
 

Catherine M. Reynolds

	 	 
	Vice President and Secretary
	 	 





2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don A. Turkleson, Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                               
|/s/    Don A. Turkleson                                                                                                        
|Don A. Turkleson Chief Financial Officer of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.

Date: August 11, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SavWatt USA, Inc. ("Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Isaac H. Sutton,
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: October 25, 2010                    /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Travelport Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Jeff Clarke, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael E. Rescoe, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
his knowledge:

|                                                                             |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JEFF CLARKEJeff Clarke Chief Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2008             |  | 
|/s/MICHAEL E. RESCOEMichael E. Rescoe Chief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2008 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-CR-00422-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in its 

Response in Opposition to the Government’s Motion in Limine to Determine Admissibility of 

Evidence (Dkt. 931), and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Excess pages is granted.

DATED this day of , 20 .

 

HON. SUSAN M. BRNOVICH

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1001-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 2A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-3 Filed 04/17/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-3 Filed 04/17/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 531-3 Filed 04/17/19 Page 3 of 3
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 968 

Expressing sympathy for and solidarity with the people of the Russian 

Federation following the bombing of the Nevsky Express. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing sympathy for and solidarity with the people of 

the Russian Federation following the bombing of the 

Nevsky Express. 

Whereas on the night of November 27, 2009, a bomb exploded on the railroad tracks derailing the Nevsky Express, a passenger train traveling from Moscow to St. Petersburg, Russia; 

Whereas more than 25 people were killed and scores more 

wounded in this terrorist attack; 

Whereas the attack on the Nevsky Express was the worst terrorist attack in Russia in years, outside the volatile 

North Caucasus; 

Whereas such acts of violence against civilian targets are 

clearly intended to spread fear across all levels of society 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 968 IH 

and thus injure, at least psychologically, a far greater 

number of people than those physically present at the 

scene of the attack; and 

Whereas the United States and many other nations have also 

experienced such acts of terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses sympathy for and solidarity with 

3 the people of the Russian Federation following the 

4 bombing of the Nevsky Express; 

5 (2) condemns all acts of terrorism wherever 

6 they may occur and against whomever they may be 

7 directed; and 

8 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent9 atives to transmit a copy of this resolution to the 

10 Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the 

11 United States. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION OFCEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TravelportLimited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Jeff Clarke, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andMichael E. Rescoe, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/  JEFF CLARKE        |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| JEFF CLARKE             |   |
| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |   |
| AUGUST 14, 2007    |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ MICHAEL E. RESCOE   |   |
| MICHAEL E. RESCOE       |   |
| CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |   |
| AUGUST 14, 2007    |   |

 

----
Order filed December 10, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals

___________

No. 11-15-00151-CR

___________

CHARLOTTE NAOMI SHILOH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court

Brown County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR22639

O R D E R

This appeal has become unduly stalled due to the failure of Appellant’s 

appointed counsel, Landon H. Thompson, to file an appellate brief. The brief was 

originally due on September 10, 2015. This court has previously granted two 

extensions of time to file Appellant’s brief: one pursuant to a motion filed by 

Thompson and one on this court’s own motion. After those deadlines had passed, 

the clerk of this court contacted Thompson by phone on November 9, 2015, and was 
2

informed by Thompson that he was working on the brief and that he would file it in 

the next few days. Appellant’s brief has yet to be filed in this court. 

By this order, Landon H. Thompson is ORDERED to file in this court a brief

on behalf of Appellant on or before 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 16, 2015. 

At that time, Appellant’s brief shall have already been e-filed or be present in the 

portal for the Eleventh Court of Appeals through eFileTexas.gov. 

PER CURIAM

December 10, 2015

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard McKilligan                                                       |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard      McKilligan                                                      |
| Chief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting    Officer) |
| November      16, 2009                                                       |

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1610]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Arms Control and Nonproliferation Policy

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Subsequent Arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended (42 U.S.C. 2160) notice is hereby given of a proposed 
``subsequent arrangement'' to be carried out in the Republic of Korea 
under the Agreement for Cooperation between the Government of the 
United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Korea 
Concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy, signed November 24, 1972, as 
amended.
    The subsequent arrangement to be carried out under the above-
mentioned agreement involves the joint determination, pursuant to 
Article VIII (c) of that Agreement, that the provisions of Article XI 
may be effectively applied for the alteration in form or content of 
U.S.-origin nuclear material contained in pressurized water reactor 
fuels, CANDU fuels, and research reactor fuels at the Post Irradiation 
Examination Facility and the Irradiated Materials Examination Facility 
at the Headquarters of the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute in 
accordance with the plan contained in KAERI/AR-417/95, Rev-1, dated 
May, 1995. The aforementioned determination will be made, and the 
approval for the post-irradiation examination for the agreed upon 
program will be granted, for the period ending December 31, 2001.
    In accordance with section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will 
not be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: January 22, 1996.

    For the Department of Energy.
Edward T. Fei,
Deputy Director, International Policy and Analysis Division, Office of 
Arms Control and Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 96-1610 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 Before the Court is Defendant Scott Spear’s Joint Motion (Unopposed) to Extend 

Time for Responses and Replies re: The Government’s (Sealed) Motion to Compel 

Destruction Of Inadvertently Disclosed Documents (Doc. 343), Motion for Access to Joint 

Representation and Joint Defense Agreements Previously Submitted by Defendants 

Michael Lacey and James Larkin for in Camera Review (Doc. 354), and Motion For 

Clarification re: Order to Resolve Attorney-Client Privilege (Doc. 355) (Second Request) 

(the “Motion”). (Doc. 397) Having reviewed the Motion, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. 397) is denied in 

part and granted in part. The Motion is denied as it pertains to extending the time for 

responses and replies to the Government’s (Sealed) Motion to Compel Destruction of 

Inadvertently Disclosed Documents. (Docs. 343, 352, 396) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendants shall have until December 10, 

2018 to file responses to the Government’s Motion for Access to Joint Representation and 

Joint Defense Agreements Previously Submitted by Defendants Michael Lacey and James 

 United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 398 Filed 11/20/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Larkin for in Camera Review and the Government’s Motion For Clarification re: Order to 

Resolve Attorney-Client Privilege. (Docs. 354, 355) The Government shall have until 

January 4, 2019 to file any replies in support of Docs. 354 and 355. No further extensions 

will be granted. 

 Dated this 20th day of November, 2018. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 398 Filed 11/20/18 Page 2 of 2
#### The WOODSON ESTATES HOMES ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. Jerry D. JOHN and Barbara John, Respondents.

No. WD 49429.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 28, 1995.

Betty Jean Bond, Kansas City, for appellant.

David P. Hargrave, Kansas City, for respondents.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.

*731ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The Woodson Estates Homes Association appeals the trial court’s decision that a composite roof shingle made of wood fibers satisfied a restrictive covenant’s requirement of “wood shingles.” We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).