alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State, ex rel. Diehl, Pros. Atty., *v.*Colwell.

(No. 22743

Decided November 4, 1931.)

*Mr. Edwin 8. Diehl,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Gerald P. Openlander,*for relator.

*Mr. Tellis T. Shaw*and *Mr. Fred L. Hay,*for defendant.

By the Court

(Allen, J.).

This case has previously been heard in this court upon demurrer to the petition, and the demurrer to the petition was overruled. *State, ex rel. Diehl, Pros. Atty.,*v. *Colwell,*123 Ohio St., 535, 176 N. E., 117. The defendant desiring to plead further has now filed an answer which concedes the material allegations of the petition and sets up various collateral facts. Among other things, he avers that the journal entry set forth in the petition was not entered upon the date which it hears, and denies that the revocation of the appointment was made upon the specific date alleged in the petition; avers that he had no notice of the order until some four years after it purports to have been made; avers that the journal entry in question was made without notice to him, the county auditor, the hoard of county commissioners, or the Defiance County Humane Society; and avers that he discharged the duties of his office and drew his monthly salary for a period of more than four years after the order purports to have been *330made, being recognized by tbe probate judge as such humane agent, without protest or objection.

The relator has demurred to this answer, and we hence consider'its legal sufficiency.

The well-pleaded facts set up in the answer and conceded by the demurrer do not affect the controlling question in the case, which still remains the following: When a probate judge has once approved the appointment of a humane officer, under Section 10071, General Code, may the successor in office of such probate judge revoke the appointment upon the ground that there is no such necessity for the service of such humane officer as would justify the payment of the expense out of the public treasury?

This question was considered at length and decided in the affirmative and adversely to the defendant. *State, ex rel. Diehl, Pros. Atty.,*v. *Colwell, supra.*Upon the authority of that holding the demurrer to the answer is sustained.

*Demurrer to ansiver sustained, and, judgment of ouster.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.
|   | 1. | The      Annual Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period  ended      September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November22,      2010                                                                         |   | By: | /s/      ROBERT MCNULTY |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  Robert      McNultyTitle:    Chief      ExecutiveOfficer |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, CR. NO. 08-20604

v. HONORABLE ROBERT H. CLELAND

DONALD WALKER,

Defendant.

 /

 ORDER ALLOWING COUNSEL TO 

USE COMPUTER FOR REVIEW OF DISCOVERY WITH

 DEFENDANT DONALD WALKER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that attorney Rafael C. Villarruel shall be allowed

to use his laptop computer and review discovery discs that have been produced by the

Government in this case, when he consults with Defendant Donald Walker at the St.

Clair County Jail;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the notice of this order shall be

accomplished by forwarding this order to the St. Clair County Sheriff and/or any other

personnel the Sheriff designates defense counsel to provide notice of this order. 

SO ORDERED.

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: December 9, 2008
2

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record

on this date, December 9, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 S/Lisa Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendant Brunst’s Second Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Respond to United States’ Motion to Resolve Attorney-Client 

Privilege Issues (Doc. 214), filed on behalf of all Defendants, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time (Doc. 214) is 

GRANTED and the deadline for all Defendants to respond to the motion to resolve 

privilege issues is extended to and including July 20, 2018. 

 The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) ____ from ____ to 

____. 

 Dated this 12th day of July, 2018. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 215 Filed 07/12/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of EDT Learning, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"). I, James M. Powers, Jr.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company in respect to those items required to be described or
          presented in such Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

By: /s/ James M. Powers, Jr.
    ------------------------------------
    James M. Powers, Jr.,
    Chairman of the Board, President and
    Chief Executive Officer
    June 30, 2003
EXHIBIT 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended December 31, 2008 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
    
    that as of the date of this statement, the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 April 16, 2009
    
    /s/ William J. WagnerDate
    
    William J. Wagner
President and Chief Executive OfficerApril 16, 2009
    
    /s/ William W. Harvey, Jr.Date
    
    William W. Harvey, Jr.
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
1

Paragraph D has been revised in light of TK’s partial objections. See Doc. 125.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TK HOLDINGS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 

Case No. 08-14266 

-vsHON. AVERN COHN

CTS CORP., et al.,

CTS CASE

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff.

________________________________________/

ORDER OF BIFURCATION

AND

REVISED1 SCHEDULING ORDER

A.

This is a patent case. CTS claims that TK has infringed three of its patents, as

follows:

U.S. Patent No. 6,431,013, B2, Strain Gage Having An Attached Unstrained Area

for the Mounting of Signal Conditioning Components (“the ‘013 patent”)

U.S. Patent No. 6,467,361 B2, Strain Gage Sensor Having an Unstrained Area

(“the ‘361 patent”)

U.S. Patent No. 6,161,891, Vehicle Seat Weight Sensors (“the ‘891 patent)

On May 14, 2012, the Court held a Markman hearing on the ‘891 patent and

heard argument on TK’s motions for reconsideration of its Markman decision regarding

the ‘013 and ‘361 patents. Following the hearing, the Court held a status conference

with the parties. This order memorializes the matters discussed at the hearing and the

status conference.

B.

Liability and damages are BIFURCATED. The issue of wilfulness is also

2:08-cv-14266-AC-DAS Doc # 126 Filed 05/23/12 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 3016
2

BIFURCATED. The parties shall advise the Court within ten (10) days if they consent to

try damages and wilfulness to the Court.

C.

TK shall file by Monday, May 21, 2012 a supplemental paper regarding its

motions for reconsideration. CTS shall file a response by Tuesday, May 29, 2012. 

D.

Expert discovery shall be completed within ninety (90) days after the Court

issues its Markman decision on the ‘891 patent and its decision on TK’s motions for

reconsideration. Thereafter, 

If the claim construction favors CTS’s position, CTS may move for summary

judgment on liability (infringement) within thirty (30) days. 

Additionally, TK may move for summary judgment of non-infringement and/or

invalidity within thirty (30) days.

2.

If the claim construction favors TK’s position, TK may move for summary

judgment of non-infringement and/or invalidity within thirty (30) days.

E.

Any objections to this order shall be filed within five (5) days.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 23, 2012 s/ Avern Cohn 

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I hereby certify that a copy of this notice was sent to parties of record on May 23, 2012,

electronically and/or by U.S. mail.

s/Michael Williams 

Relief Case Manager to the Honorable

Avern Cohn

2:08-cv-14266-AC-DAS Doc # 126 Filed 05/23/12 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 3017
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 15, 2016

NO. 03-15-00716-CV

Max Rodriguez, Appellant

v.

Scott Noel, Dr. Roy Klein, and Hon-Ling Klein, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on September 23, 2015. Appellant 

has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that 

the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. 

Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   September 14, 2011





|/s/ David Hackman                                
|-------------------------------------------------
|David Hackman, CEO                               
|(Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



Dated:  September 14, 2011





|/s/ Rakesh Malhotra                              
|-------------------------------------------------
|Rakesh Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer         
|(Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Copper Corp.)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Defendants Lacey’s and Larkin’s unopposed Motion for 

Leave to File Over Length Opposition to United States’ Motion to Resolve Privilege 

Issues and Cross Motion to Obtain and Address Privilege Issues (Doc. 225), and good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall file 

Defendants Lacey’s and Larkin’s over-length response to government’s motion to resolve 

privilege issues and cross motion to obtain discovery and address privilege issues (lodged 

at Doc. 226) and supporting exhibits (lodged at Doc. 227). 

 The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) ____ from ____ to 

____. 

 Dated this 25th day of July, 2018. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 234 Filed 07/26/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald L. COATS, Jr., Appellant. Ronald L. COATS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 49617, WD 51238.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 25, 1996.

Rose M. Wibbenmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Fernando Bermudez, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before EDWIN H. SMITH, P.J., and BRECKENRIDGE and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Ronald L. Coats appeals his criminal conviction by a jury for the possession of more than thirty-five grams of marijuana, § 195.202,1 and the subsequent denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Coats was sentenced to a term of six years as a prior offender under § 558.016 and § 557.036.4.

Judgment affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

1

. Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to RSMo 1994.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 2832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1490]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Regions Financial Corporation, et al.; Formations of; 
Acquisitions by; and Mergers of Bank Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied for the Board's 
approval under section 3 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842) and Sec.  225.14 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.14) to 
become a bank holding company or to acquire a bank or bank holding 
company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications 
are set forth in section 3(c) of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Each application is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must 
include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in 
lieu of a hearing, identifying specifically any questions of fact that 
are in dispute and summarizing the evidence that would be presented at 
a hearing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received not later than February 22, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Zane R. Kelley, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    1. Regions Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama; to merge 
with First Gwinnett Bancshares, Inc., Norcross, Georgia, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Gwinnett Bank, Norcross, Georgia.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690:
    1. Bank of Waunakee Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Waunakee, 
Wisconsin; to acquire 45.70 percent of the voting shares of Waunakee 
Bank Shares, Inc., Waunakee, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Bank of Waunakee, Waunakee, Wisconsin.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Executive Bancshares, Inc., Paris, Texas; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of Collin County National Bank, McKinney, Texas, a 
de novo bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 23, 
1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-1490 Filed 1-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32831-32832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16177]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 32832]]

amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Name of SEP: Demonstration and Education Research Grant 
Applications and Dietary Patterns, Sodium Intake, and Blood Pressure 
(DiPSIBoP).
    Date: July 16-17, 1996.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: Washington National Airport Hilton Arlington, Virginia.
    Contact Person: Louise P. Corman, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7180, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0270.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    Name of SEP: Angiogenesis and Vascular Remodeling in the 
Microvasculature.
    Date: July 22-23, 1996.
    Time: 7:30 p.m.
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center, 9751 
Washington Boulevard, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878.
    Contact Person: Jon Ranhand, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7093, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0280.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: June 18, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-16177 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31545-31546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15739]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[CA-942-5700-00]


Filing of Plats of Survey; California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to inform the public and 
interested State and local government officials of the latest filing of 
plats of survey in California.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Unless otherwise noted, filing was effective at 10:00 
a.m. on the next Federal work day following the plat acceptance date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clifford A. Robinson, Chief, Branch of Cadastral Survey, Bureau of Land 
Management (BLM), California State Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Room E-
2845, Sacramento, CA 95825, 916-979-2890.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The plats of survey of lands described below 
have been officially filed at the California State Office of the Bureau 
of Land Management in Sacramento, CA.

Mount Diablo Meridan, California

T. 6 N., R. 13 E.,--Supplemental plat of section 8, accepted May 7, 
1996, to meet certain administrative needs of the BLM, Bakersfield 
District, Folsom Resource Area
T. 2 S., R. 6 W.,--Resurvey, meets-and-bounds survey, and corrective 
resurvey, (Group 1024) accepted May 24, 1996, to meet certain 
administrative needs of the National Park Service, Golden Gate 
National Recreation Area (GGNRA) Boundary
T. 26 S., R. 11 E.,--Supplemental plat of the W\1/2\ of Section 7, 
accepted May 29, 1996, to meet certain administrative needs of the 
BLM, Bakersfield District, Caliente Resource Area

San Bernardino Meridian, California

T. 9 N., R. 1 W.,--Supplemental plat of portions of sections 19 and 
20, accepted May 24, 1996, to meet certain administrative needs of 
the BLM, California Desert District, Barstow Resource Area.

    All of the above listed survey plats are now the basic record for 
describing the lands for all authorized purposes. The survey plats have 
been placed in the open files in the BLM, California State Office, and 
are available to the public as a matter of information. Copies of the 
survey plats are related field notes will

[[Page 31546]]

be furnished to the public upon payment of the appropriate fee.

    Dated: June 11, 1996.
Clifford A. Robinson,
Chief, Branch of Cadastral Survey.
[FR Doc. 96-15739 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50463

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERNANDO CASTANEDA-QUIROZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-1564-1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando 

Castaneda-Quiroz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castaneda-Quiroz has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50463 Document: 00513883177 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-50463

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50463 Document: 00513883177 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017