alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT Monthly Income &
Growth Fund IV, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Chad C. Braun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in the capacity as an officer of the General Partner of the Company,
that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
 or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                       |       |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|---------------------- | ----- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August
 14, 2009 | By:   | /s/ Chad C. Braun                                                                                                                                                                                  
|                       | Name: | Chad C.
 Braun                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                       | Title | Executive
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth IV Corporation, the General Partner of AmREIT
 Monthly Income & Growth Fund IV, L.P.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 994 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 994

      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the decision to dismiss United States v. New Black Panther 
                                 Party.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2009

Mr. Wolf submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives all information in the Attorney General's possession 
relating to the decision to dismiss United States v. New Black Panther 
                                 Party.

    Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to transmit to the 
House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of 
adoption of this resolution, copies of any document, memo, or 
correspondence of the Department of Justice with regard to United 
States v. New Black Panther Party, or any portion of any such document, 
memo, or correspondence that refers or relates to--
            (1) any department communications with regard to the case 
        between November 5, 2008, and November 15, 2009;
            (2) any communication with the defendants or the 
        defendants' attorneys between November 5, 2008, and November 
        15, 2009;
            (3) any communication with third-party organizations or 
        individuals between November 5, 2008, and November 15, 2009; or
            (4) any evidence with regard to the dismissal of the case.
                                 <all>
```
|    |                                                                                                                  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                          |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
|                                                     |
| /s/ MEG A. GENTLE                                        |
| Meg A. Gentle                                            |
| Chief Financial Officer of                               |
| Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC, the general partner of |
| Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.                           |
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 14.5

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
F-4 No. 333-121220) of Mittal Steel Company N.V. (formerly Ispat International
N.V.) and in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-107102) pertaining to the Ispat International N.V. Global Stock Option
Plan, of our report dated February 12, 2003, with respect to the financial
statements of Ispat Hamburg Group of Companies, included in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Ernst & Young
Deutsche Allgemeine Treuhand AG
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft

/s/ M. Tabel                                  /s/ E.-W. Schluschen
Wirtschaftsprufer                             Wirtschaftsprufer

Hamburg, Germany
March 28, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIAN VINCENT CROSBY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 466 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 51 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 1
Form of Officer Severance Agreement Amendment No. 2 effective December 19, 2008



 EXHIBIT 10.54 
 CORNING INCORPORATED 
 OFFICER SEVERANCE AGREEMENT 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 Whereas Corning Incorporated
(the “Company”) and                      (the “Executive”) entered into that certain Officer Severance Agreement dated
February 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”); and 
 Whereas the Company and the Executive amended such Agreement on December 12, 2007
(Amendment No. 1); and 
 Whereas the Company and the Executive want to amend the Agreement to take into account federal tax law changes under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations issued thereunder. 
 Now Therefore, the Company and Executive
hereby agree to the following amendments, which shall be effective as of January 1, 2005: 
  

	1.	Subsection 3(a)(viii) of the Agreement is amended by replacing the second sentence of such subsection with the following: “Such purchase must take place and be finalized in the
calendar year following the year in which the Termination Date occurs and, if the Executive is a “specified employee” (as defined in Section 409A), on a date that is at least 6 months after the Termination Date and shall be made at
the greater of (i) the residence’s appraised value at the Termination Date, as determined in accordance with the Company’s relocation policies in effect immediately prior to the Involuntary Termination, or (ii) the total cost of
the residence plus improvements and tax gross-up as applicable (“Protected Value”), as determined in accordance with the Company’s Protected Value policy in effect as of the date of this Agreement.” 

  

	2.	The following new Section 14 shall be added to the end of the Agreement: 

 “14. SECTION 409A. To the extent that payments or benefits under this Agreement are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury regulations and other
authoritative guidance issued thereunder (“Section 409A”), this Agreement shall be governed by the requirements of Section 409A, and this Agreement shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with that intent. If any provision
of this Agreement would otherwise conflict with or frustrate this intent, that provision will be interpreted and deemed amended so as to avoid the conflict.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on December 19, 2008. 
  

							
	CORNING INCORPORATED
			
	  
	 		 	  

	By:	 	John P. MacMahon	 		 	Executive
		 	Senior Vice President,	 		 	
		 	Global Compensation and Benefits	 		 	

  

 181
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 14, 2017

No. 04-16-00623-CR

Billy Ray MONREAL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-04-11496-CR

The Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s third motion for extension of time to file its brief is granted. The State’s brief 

is due on August 9, 2017.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________

Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                                                                                 
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/ Jonathan J. Ledecky                                                         
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Jonathan J. Ledecky                                                             
|                        |  | Title: |  | President and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer)                           
|                        |  |       
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |        |  | /s/ Eric J. Watson                                                              
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Eric J. Watson                                                                  
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chairman of the Board and Treasurer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 10.17**

 

**ITC^DeltaCom, Inc.**

 

**Description of Annual Bonus Plan**

 

ITC^DeltaCom, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains an annual bonus plan for the benefit of its corporate officers and certain other employees of theCompany and its subsidiaries. Bonuses are specified as a percentage of the employee’s annual base salary. Bonus percentages generally are set by job classification level within the Company, except that bonus percentages for the most seniorexecutive officers of the Company are established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 

 

The Compensation Committee establishes annual target bonus awards based on the achievement of the financial and operating objectives set by theCompensation Committee for the Company. Typically, and except as may be provided in the employment and retention agreements of the Company’s most senior executives, 100% of annual bonuses payable to senior executives under the business plan aretied to the Company’s achievement of revenue, EBITDA (cash flow) and capital budget targets. Bonuses for other executives and employees are determined based on varying percentages of annual base salary, tied to individual and departmentalperformance. Company performance (measured against targets set for senior executives) plays a factor in determining all bonus awards. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to modify the foregoing percentage for senior executive officers asit deems appropriate, subject to compliance with applicable employment and retention agreements of the Company’s most senior executives.****
EXHIBIT 2C

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-4 Filed 03/12/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-4 Filed 03/12/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-4 Filed 03/12/19 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15727]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-302]


Florida Power Corporation, Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant 
(License No. DPR-72); Receipt of Petition for Director's Decision Under 
10 CFR 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that the staff of the U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) has received a petition dated March 28, 
1996, filed by Louis D. Putney, Esq., on behalf of Barry L. Bennett 
(petitioner). The petition requests, pursuant to section 2.206 of Title 
10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR 2.206), that the NRC 
investigate concerns regarding security deficiencies at Florida Power 
Corporation's Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant (Crystal River). 
The petition also requests that, upon a determination that these 
concerns are valid, the NRC institute a proceeding to suspend or revoke 
the operating license of Crystal River pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202 until 
such time as these concerns are corrected.
    As the basis for his petition, Mr. Bennett claims that during his 
employment with SBI Inc., a company that provided contract nuclear 
security services for Florida Power Corporation, he observed various 
security deficiencies at Crystal River.
    The petition is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the 
Commission's regulations. The petition has been referred to the 
Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. As provided by 10 
CFR 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on the petition within a 
reasonable time.
    A copy of the petition is available for inspection and copying in 
the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20555.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 14th day of June 1996.
Frank J. Miraglia,
Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 96-15727 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
H. Res. 905 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 16, 2009. 

Whereas the United States Supreme Court has played a fundamental role in interpreting the Nation’s laws; 

Whereas Louis D. Brandeis, born in Louisville, Kentucky, on 

November 13, 1856, led a selfless career as a practicing 

lawyer helping to create the pro bono tradition in the 

United States through his devotion to public causes, becoming known as the ‘‘people’s lawyer’’ for challenging 

the power of railroad, bank, and insurance company monopolies; 

Whereas Justice Brandeis was nominated an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court by appointment of President 

Woodrow Wilson and confirmed by the United States 

Senate in 1916 as the first Jewish Justice of the Supreme Court; 

Whereas Justice Brandeis vastly contributed to constitutional 

jurisprudence, particularly in the areas of free speech, 

right to privacy, labor relations, and women’s suffrage; 

Whereas through the marshalling of evidence and development of the doctrine of judicial notice, Justice Brandeis 

concerned himself as a citizen, attorney, and Justice of 

the Supreme Court with the power and role of education 

in the Nation’s democracy; 
2 

•HRES 905 EH 

Whereas Justice Brandeis supported the University of Louisville and its law school (named the Louis D. Brandeis 

School of Law in 1997) by contributing funding and his 

personal papers and ensuring that the law school library 

received Supreme Court briefs for its archives; 

Whereas Justice Brandeis provided the role model for public 

service which served as the inspiration for the University 

of Louisville adopting a public service requirement for all 

students; 

Whereas Justice Brandeis resigned from the Supreme Court 

70 years ago in 1939; and 

Whereas, to this day, schools, universities, the United States 

Postal Service, and other institutions remember the name 

of Justice Brandeis and commemorate his service: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 70th anniversary of Justice Louis 

D. Brandeis’s retirement from the United States Supreme Court and the significant contribution he made in 

United States Supreme Court jurisprudence; and 

(2) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make available enrolled copies of this resolution 

to the University of Louisville Louis D. Brandeis School 

of Law for appropriate display. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

Bruce Feder (AZ Bar No. 004832)

FEDER LAW OFFICE, P.A. 

2930 E. Camelback Road, Suite 160

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Telephone: (602) 257-0135

bf@federlawpa.com 

Attorney for Scott Spear

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Scott Spear, et al., 

 

 Defendants.

Case No. CR18-00422-PHX-DJH-003

DEFENDANT SPEAR’S MOTION TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY FOR STATUS CONFERENCE 

SET FOR NOVEMBER 2, 2022 

(Accelerated Ruling Requested)

(Assigned to the Hon. Diane J. Humetewa)

Defendant Scott Spear, by and through his attorney undersigned, respectfully 

moves this court to allow Bruce Feder/Feder Law Office, P.A., to appear telephonically 

for the Status Conference set for November 2, 2022, before this Court. Defendant 

requests this as undersigned counsel will be outside the United States from October 21, 

2022 through November 5, 2022, and will likely only have telephonic access to the 

Court, his office and his clients. This trip was and has been preplanned and prepaid 

since approximately September, 2022. 

Therefore, it is respectfully requested that this Court issue an Order allowing 

undersigned counsel to appear telephonically for the Status Conference set for 

November 2, 2022 before this Court. 

It is not expected that excludable delay pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h) will 

occur as a result of this motion or from an order based thereon.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1479 Filed 10/19/22 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of October, 2022. 

FEDER LAW OFFICE PA

s/ Bruce Feder 

Bruce Feder

Attorneys for Scott Spear

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1479 Filed 10/19/22 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

4 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on October 19, 2022, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of 

a Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their 

appearance as counsel of record. 

THE HONORABLE DIANE J. HUMETEWA

United States District Court

Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse

401 W. Washington Street

Phoenix, AZ 85004

Email: Humetewa_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov 

By: /s/ M. Evans 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1479 Filed 10/19/22 Page 3 of 3
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 14, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-184

Lower Tribunal No. F21-13630B

________________

Malik Mocombe,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch, 

Judge.

Eugene F. Zenobi, Regional Counsel, and Kristen Kawass, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. 

MILLER, J.
2

Appellant, Malik Mocombe, appeals from an order denying his Florida 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4) motion to dismiss one count of 

unlawful use or attempted use of an antishoplifting or inventory control device 

countermeasure within any premises used for a retail establishment, in 

violation of section 812.015(7), Florida Statutes (2022). Because the 

undisputed facts failed to establish that he used or attempted to use the 

pocketknife recovered from his person, let alone that the instrument itself 

satisfied the plain and unambiguous statutory definition of “any item or device 

which is designed, manufactured, modified, or altered to defeat any 

antishoplifting or inventory control device,” we are constrained to reverse and 

remand with instructions to dismiss the challenged charge. § 812.015(1)(i), 

Fla. Stat.; Tallahassee Mem’l Reg’l Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Tallahassee Med. Ctr., 

Inc., 681 So. 2d 826, 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“When the language of a 

statute is clear and unambiguous and conveys a clear and definite meaning, 

there is no occasion for resorting to the rules of statutory interpretation and 

construction; the statute itself must be given its plain and obvious meaning.”)

(quoting C.S. v. S.H., 671 So. 2d 260, 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)); State v. 

Blunt, 744 So. 2d 1258, 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (holding aluminum foil 

used to defeat inventory device failed to satisfy requisite statutory definition 

of antishoplifting or inventory control device countermeasure because it was 
3

not “designed, manufactured, modified, or altered”); see also Cenatis v. 

State, 120 So. 3d 41, 44 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (emphasizing plain wording of 

applicable definition). 

Reversed and remanded.