alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

2AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER (6SHFLI\)

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS  

PAPER COPY

3')HPDLO

$6&,,HPDLO

14 DAYS  

7 DAYSH[SHGLWHG  

DAILY

 

HOURLY

 

REALTIME

 

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025(7+$121()250$7,

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Gopi K. Panchapakesan (310) 201-2100 September 3, 2021

Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow, P.C.

1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor Los Angeles CA 90067

2:18-cr-00422-PHX-SMB Hon. Susan Brnovich September 3, 2021

USA v. Lacey, et al. Phoenix AZ

✔

✔

Trial September 3, 2021

✔

✔

/s/ Gopi K. Panchapakesan

September 3, 2021

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1270 Filed 09/03/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16418]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss air carrier/general aviation maintenance 
issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on July 18 and 19, 1996, beginning at 
9:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m., respectively. Arrange for oral presentations 
by July 12, 1996.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the General Aviation 
Manufacturers Association, 1400 K Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, 
DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Brenda Courtney, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of 
Rulemaking (ARM-200), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591, telephone (202) 267-3327; facsimile number (202) 267-5075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Sec. 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
to be held on July 18 and 19 at the General Aviation Manufacturers 
Association, 1400 K Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The agenda will including:
    <bullet> Discussion of the working group's draft Part 66 Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking, the corresponding advisory circulars (2), and the 
corresponding brochure. The ARAC is anticipating a vote on these 
documents at this meeting.
    <bullet> Status reports from all other working groups.
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by July 12, 
1996, to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present 
written statements to the committee at any time by providing 25 copies 
to the Executive Director, or by bringing the copies to the meeting. In 
addition, sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the 
meeting, as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 
calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements may be made by 
contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 20, 1996.
Benjamin J. Burton, Jr.,
Acting Assistant Executive Director for Air Carrier/General Aviation 
Maintenance Issues, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 96-16418 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### $17,329.00, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 01-93-00071-CV.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.).

Dec. 2, 1993.

Frank Alvarez, Houston, for appellant.

John B. Holmes, Jr., Alan Curry, Brian Johnson, Houston, for appellee.

Before DUGGAN, HUTSON-DUNN and ANDELL, JJ.

*789OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

Under Tex.Code CRIM.ProC.Ann. art. 59.01 et seq. (Vernon Supp.1993), the State filed a notice of seizure and intended forfeiture of $18,329.00, one video camera, and one cellular telephone. The trial court ordered in part that $17,329.00 be forfeited to the State. Xavier Hernandez Ochoa, the purported defendant-in-interest, challenges the forfeiture of the $17,329.00. We dismiss the appeal.

Ochoa brings three points of error attacking the trial court’s disposition of the $17,329.00. The State, however, contends that Ochoa has no standing to challenge the judgment. We agree.

At trial, Ochoa testified as follows:

> Q. Now, the money that was found in the other parts of the house from where you were sleeping, is any of that money yours?1

> A. No.

Ochoa reiterates in his brief that “the money in question is not his[.]”

Under these facts, Ochoa has no standing to appeal the forfeiture of the $17,329.00. In a forfeiture case, an alleged defendant-in-interest cannot obtain a reversal of the proceedings where he or she has no property right or interest in the property forfeited. *Valero v. State,*664 S.W.2d 728, 730 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1983, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Because Ochoa disclaims ownership in the $17,-329.00 and has no other interest therein,2 he can show no injury by the money’s forfeiture and no entitlement to appeal from the judgment. *Id.*

Persons who are strangers to a judgment have no right to seek its review on appeal. *Stroud v. Stroud,*733 S.W.2d 619, 620 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1987, no writ). An appeal prosecuted under such circumstances should be dismissed for lack of standing. *See id.*at 622.

We dismiss Ochoa’s appeal.

1

. None of the seized money was found where Ochoa had been sleeping.

2

. An "interest holder” for purposes of the forfeiture here is "the bona fide holder of a perfected lien or a perfected security interest in property.” Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 59.01(4) (Vernon Supp.1993). It is undisputed that Ochoa was not the holder of a perfected lien or a perfected security interest in the money.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32784]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16145]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Corps of Engineers


Availability of Surplus Land and Buildings Located at Savanna 
Army Depot, Savanna, IL

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice identifies the surplus real property located at 
Savanna Army Depot, Route 84, (approximately 7 miles north of the town 
of Savanna) Savanna, Illinois.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For more information regarding particular properties identified in this 
notice (i.e. acreage, floor plans, existing sanitary facilities, exact 
street address), contact Ms. Laura Whitworth, Army Corps of Engineers, 
P.O. Box 59, Louisville, KY 40201-0059 (telephone 502/625-7303, fax 
502-625-7324); or Mr. Arlen Dahlman, Base Transition Field Office, 
Savanna Army Depot Activity, Savanna, Illinois 61074-9636 (telephone 
815/273-8311).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This surplus property is available under the 
provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 
1949 and the Base Closure Community Redevelopment and Homeless 
Assistance Act of 1994. Notices of interest should be forwarded to 
Savanna Army Depot Local Redevelopment Authority, ATTN: Mr. Steven M. 
Haring, P.O. Box 325, Savanna, Illinois 61074 (telephone 815/273-4371).
    The surplus real property totals 3,157 acres and includes 15 office 
buildings, 201 storage/warehouse buildings ranging in square footage, 
251 other buildings including recreation, housing and dining areas, 
maintenance facilities, and various metal and woodworking shops. A 
railroad runs throughout the installation giving access to many areas 
including the loading docks.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 96-16145 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-JB-M
#### Betty Lea HATCHER, Respondent, v. Mac Leroy HATCHER, Appellant.

No. WD 49853.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 16, 1995.

Robert B. Paden, Maysville, for appellant.

Patrick E. Richardson, Gifford *&*Richardson, Green City, *for*respondent.

Before ULRICH, P.J., and LOWENSTEIN and ELLIS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the judgment of the trial court in a dissolution proceeding which divided nonmarital and marital property and debt.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 10/2018)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9

PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS(expedited) 9 9

DAILY

9 9

HOURLY

9 9

REALTIME

9 9

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

3 DAYS

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.) By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1759 Filed 09/06/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.11












Exhibit 10.11




Summary of Certain Compensation for

Directors of Park National Corporation




Annual Retainers and Meeting Fees




     Each director of Park National Corporation (“Park”) who is not an employee of Park or one of
Park’s subsidiaries (a “non-employee director”) receives, on the date of the regular meeting of the
Park Board of Directors held during the fourth fiscal quarter, an annual retainer in the form of
120 common shares of Park awarded under the Park National Corporation Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors of Park National Corporation and Subsidiaries (the “Directors’ Stock Plan”).



     Each non-employee director receives $1,000 for each meeting of the Park Board of Directors
attended and $400 for each meeting of a committee of the Park Board of Directors attended. If the
date of a meeting of the full Board of Directors is changed from that provided for by resolution of
the Board and a non-employee director is not able to attend the rescheduled meeting, he or she
receives the meeting fee as though he or she attended the meeting.



     In addition, each member of the Executive Committee of the Park Board of Directors receives a
$2,500 annual cash retainer and each member of the Audit Committee of the Park Board of Directors
(other than the Chair) receives a $2,000 annual cash retainer. The Chair of the Audit Committee
receives a $5,000 annual cash retainer.



     Each non-employee director of Park also serves on the board of directors of The Park National
Bank, the national bank subsidiary of Park (“PNB”), or on the advisory board of one of PNB’s
divisions, and receives, on the date of the regular meeting of the Park Board of Directors held
during the fourth fiscal quarter, an annual retainer in the form of 60 common shares of Park
awarded under the Directors’ Stock Plan and, in some cases, a specified amount of cash for such
service as well as fees for attendance at meetings of the board of directors of PNB or the advisory
board of the applicable division of PNB (and committees of the respective boards).



     In addition to the annual retainers and meeting fees discussed above, non-employee directors
also receive reimbursement of all reasonable travel and other expenses of attending board and
committee meetings.



     C. Daniel DeLawder, William T. McConnell, William A. Phillips and David L. Trautman receive no
compensation for serving as members of the Board of Directors of Park or of any subsidiary of Park.



Other Compensation




     William T. McConnell is employed by PNB in a non-executive officer capacity. In such
capacity, he received the amount of $33,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 (the “2008 fiscal year). William A. Phillips is employed by Century National Bank, a
division of PNB, in a non-executive officer capacity. In such capacity, he received the amount of
$33,000 during the 2008 fiscal year.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, J r. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 29, 2010

s0125 

# Order

January 29, 2010

139423 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139423 COA: 290928 Eaton CC: 96-020408-FH TYRONE LAVON KEYS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 29, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Willis BRESHEARS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20671.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

Oct. 15, 1996.

Lisa C. Henderson, Buffalo, for defendant-appellant.

Thomas M. Johnson, Pros. Atty., Hickory County, Hermitage, for plaintiff-respondent.

PARRISH, Judge.

Willis Breshears (defendant) appeals a misdemeanor conviction in a court-tried ease. He was charged with and found guilty of violating § 304.016.4(1), RSMo 1994, by driv*589ing a vehicle to the left side of the roadway at a location where the view was obstructed by a hill.

Defendant’s trial was held October 31, 1995. After finding defendant guilty, the trial court set sentencing for November 28, 1995. Defendant filed a motion for new trial that was heard and denied November 28, 1995. The trial court then granted allocution and sentenced defendant to pay a fine in the amount of ten dollars and costs. Defendant paid the fine and costs that day. The record does not reflect that payment of the fine and costs was made under protest or with any reservation. Notice of appeal was filed December 7,1995.

“In order to preserve any issue for appeal in a criminal case where the sentence consists of a fine and costs, the defendant must make payment of the fine under circumstances that record the payment as not voluntarily made, if payment occurs before appeal.” *State v. Hamm,*807 S.W.2d 692 (Mo.App.1991), citing *State v. Welch,*701 S.W.2d 770, 771 (Mo.App.1985). *See also State v. Zeigenbein,*878 S.W.2d 512, 513 (Mo.App.1994). Appeal dismissed.

CROW, P.J., and SHRUM, J., concur.
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 494-4 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 3 to the Unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan for Senior Managers



 EXHIBIT 10.20 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY 
 UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN 
 FOR SENIOR MANAGERS 
 The International Paper Company Unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan for Senior Managers,
as amended and restated January 1, 2008 (the “SERP”), is hereby amended effective the 8th day of December 2008, with respect to terminations of
employment occurring on or after such date, as follows: 
 1. By deleting Section 6(A) in its entirety and inserting the following
language in lieu thereof: 
  

	“6.	 Form of Benefit Payment. 


  

	 	(A)	 Payment Form. The form of payment of the Supplemental Benefit is a lump sum payment. Payment of the Supplemental Benefit to an Eligible Employee shall be made on
the later of the Eligible Employee’s Retirement Date or the date six months following the Eligible Employee’s separation from service (the “Normal Payment Date”).”
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB FOR THE
YEAR ENDED  OCTOBER  31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-KSB.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0001042187
<NAME>                      CTI Industries Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     dollars

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1.000
<CASH>                                  336,832
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         3,412,053
<ALLOWANCES>                            186,251
<INVENTORY>                           5,425,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      9,951,632
<PP&E>                               18,104,882
<DEPRECIATION>                        9,048,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       21,438,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 9,321,282
<BONDS>                               5,534,876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                              1,188,434
<OTHER-SE>                            4,100,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         21,438,987
<SALES>                              18,606,414
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     18,606,414
<CGS>                                13,670,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        13,670,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      6,155,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      942,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (2,161,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (379,251)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (1,782,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,782,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (1.40)



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Leroy SHORE, Appellant. Leroy SHOBE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 61561, 66067.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Dec. 20, 1994.

Robert E. Steele, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Michelle A. Freund, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and CRANE and CRAHAN, JJ.

*769
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

In a consolidated appeal, Leroy Shobe (“Defendant”) challenges his conviction by a jury of burglary in the first degree, for which he was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment as a prior and persistent offender, and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error asserted on direct appeal are without merit. Further, the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would not serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
Exhibit 10.10**MANAGEMENT BONUS GUIDELINES****Purpose:**     Attract, retain and motivate management with exceptional ability.**Eligibility Requirements:** **–** Management personnel are eligible for consideration  **–** Employed by the company for a minimum of six months of the fiscal year  **–** Be actively employed by the company at the time of payment or retired betweenthe last day of the fiscal year and the payment date. Retirees must meet thedefinition of normal retirement — sixty-five years old with a minimum of five years ofservice with the company  **–** Rated *Meets Expectations*or higher on last performance evaluation**Calculations:** **–** Bonus percentages are based on a Board approved matrix which consists of eightcompany performance levels and five categories of management  **–** Bonus percentages for Category A are 0%, 10%, 18%, 20%, 23%, 27%, 31%, and 35%.  **–** Bonuses will be calculated on base salaries as of the last day of the fiscalyear  **–** Bonuses will be prorated for those with six but less than twelve months ofservice in the fiscal year and those promoted to an eligible position during the fiscalyear  **–** Bonuses for those on an approved leave of absence, including disability, willbe prorated based upon the number of full months actually worked during the fiscal year  **–** Bonuses will be rounded to the nearest hundredth — up or down3/1/07