[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33041-33044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16338]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 180 and 185

[PP 4F4380 and FAP 4H5703/R2240; FRL-5369-7]
RIN 2070-AB78


Flutolanil; Pesticide Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes a time-limited tolerance, to expire on 
April 30, 1998 for combined residues of the fungicide flutolanil N-(3-
(1-methylethoxy)phenyl)-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and its 
metabolites converted to 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzoic acid and 
calculated as flutolanil in or on the raw agricultural commodities rice 
grain at 2.0 ppm and rice straw at 8.0 ppm; and in or on the processed 
food commodities rice hull at 7.0 ppm and rice bran at 3.0 ppm, when 
present therein as a result of application of the fungicide to growing 
crops. The regulation to establish a maximum permissible level for 
residues of the fungicide was requested in a petition submitted by the 
AgrEvo USA Company.

 EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation became effective April 30, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
document control number, [PP 4F4380, FAP 4H5703/R2240], may be 
submitted

[[Page 33042]]

to: Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. M3708, 
401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. A copy of any objections and 
hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified by 
the document control number and submitted to: Public Response and 
Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing 
requests to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 
22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance 
Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters Accounting 
Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, 
PA 15251.
    An electronic copy of objections and hearing requests filed with 
the Hearing Clerk may be submitted to OPP by sending electronic mail 
(e-mail) to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#543b242479303b373f31201431243539353d387a3124357a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fe0ffffa2ebe0ece4eafbcfeaffeee2eee6e3a1eaffeea1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>
    Copies of electronic objections and hearing requests must be 
submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and 
any form of encryption. Copies of electronic objections and hearing 
requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect 5.1 file format 
or ASCII file format. All copies of electronic objections and hearing 
requests must be identified by the docket number [PP 4F4380, FAP 
4H5703/R2240] . No Confidential Business Information (CBI) should be 
submitted through e-mail. Copies of electronic objections and hearing 
requests on this rule may be filed online at many Federal Depository 
Libraries. Additional information on electronic submissions can be 
found below in this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Connie B. Welch, Product 
Manager (PM) 21, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 227, CM#2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 (703) 305-6226; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e394868f808bcd808c8d8d8a86a38693828e828a8fcd869382cd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a3d2f2629226429252424232f0a2f3a2b272b2326642f3a2b642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice (FRL-4926-4), published 
in theFederal Register of February 8, 1995 (60 FR 7539), which 
announced that AgrEvo USA Company had submitted pesticide petitions 
(PP) 4F4380 and FAP 4H5703 to EPA requesting that the Administrator, 
pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), establish a tolerance for combined residues 
of the fungicide flutolanil N-(3-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl)-2-
(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and its metabolites converted to 2-
(trifluoromethyl) benzoic acid and calculated as flutolanil, in or on 
the raw agricultural commodities rice grain at 2.0 ppm and rice straw 
at 8.0 ppm; and in or on the processed food commodities rice hull at 
7.0 ppm and rice bran at 3.0 ppm, when present therein as a result of 
application of the fungicide to growing crops.
     There were no comments received in response to the notice of 
filing. The scientific data submitted in the petition and other 
relevant material have been evaluated. The toxicological data 
considered in support of the tolerance include:
     1. Several acute toxicity studies that place technical flutolanil 
in Toxicity Category III (Caution). Data show minimal to slight 
irritation to the eye.
     2. A 90-day rat feeding study with a systemic no-observed effect 
level (NOEL) of 37 mg/kg/day for males and 44 mg/kg/day for females and 
a systemic lowest effect level (LEL) of 299 mg/kg/day for males and 339 
mg/kg/day for females based on increased absolute and relative liver 
weights in both the 299 mg/kg/day males and 339 mg/kg/day females and 
the 1,512 mg/kg/day males and 1,743 mg/kg/day females, along with a 
slight decrease in body weight in 1,512 mg/kg/day males.
     3. A 90-day oral study in dogs with a systemic NOEL of 80 mg/kg/
day and a systemic LEL of 400 mg/kg/day based on enlarged livers and 
increased glycogen deposition in the livers of both males and females. 
High dose (2,000 mg/kg/day) males and females showed increased alkaline 
phosphatase levels and cholesterol thyroid/parathyroid organ weights.
     4. A 2-year feeding/carcinogenicity study in rats with a systemic 
NOEL of 86.9 mg/kg/day for males and 103.1 mg/kg/day for females and a 
systemic LEL of 460.5 mg/kg/day for males and 535.8 mg/kg/day for 
females based on reduced body weight and body weight gain in males 
along with decreased and absolute relative weights in females. 
Flutolanil was not carcinogenic under the conditions of this study.
     5. A carcinogenicity study in mice with a systemic NOEL of 735 mg/
kg/day for males and 1,168 mg/kg/day for females and a systemic LEL of 
13,333 mg/kg/day for males and 1,839 mg/kg/day for females based on 
body weight gains in the high dose females which were significantly 
lower than those of controls during the first 24 weeks of treatment. 
There were no effects of biological importance on survival, clinical 
signs, food intake, hematology, gross pathology, or histopathology. 
Flutolanil was not carcinogenic under the conditions of this study.
     6. A 2-year oral feeding study in dogs with a systemic NOEL of 50 
mg/kg/day for males and females and a systemic LEL of 250 mg/kg/day 
based on increased incidence of clinical signs (emesis, salivation, 
soft stools, lower body weight gains and decreased food consumption in 
the 250 and 1,250 mg/kg group males and females.
     7. A rat developmental toxicity study with a maternal NOEL of 
1,000 mg/kg/day (limit dose) and a developmental toxicity NOEL of 1,000 
mg/kg/day (limit dose). Developmental toxicity was not observed at any 
dose level.
     8. A rabbit developmental toxicity study with a maternal NOEL of 
40 mg/kg/day and a maternal LEL of 200 mg/kg/day based on increased 
resorptions in the 200 and 1,000 mg/kg group. A developmental NOEL of 
40 mg/kg/day, and a developmental LEL of 200 mg/kg/day were based on 
increased resorptions in the 200 and 1,000 mg/kg/day group.
     9. A 2-generation rat reproduction study with a parental toxicity 
NOEL of 1,936 mg/kg/day (limit dose) and a reproductive toxicity NOEL 
of 1,936 mg/kg/day (limit dose).
     10. Mutagenicity studies included: An Ames Assay which was 
negative; Chromosome Aberration studies which showed flutolanil induced 
chromosomal aberrations in cultured Chinese Hamster lung cells in the 
presence of metabolic activation; Reverse Data which showed that 
flutolanil did not cause an increase in revertant colonies using 
Salmonella and E.coli strains; Micronucleus Assay data which indicated 
that flutolanil, up to a dose of 10 gm/kg, did not induce micronuclei 
in the bone marrow erythrocytes of male and female mice; Unscheduled 
DNA Synthesis (UDS) data which showed that flutolanil did not induce 
UDS because the test compound failed to induce a genotoxic response in 
the in vitro assay; and Lymphoma mutation test data which showed that 
flutolanil was found to be nonmutagenic in the Mammalian Cell Gene 
Mutation Assay.
     The Reference Dose (RfD) used in the analysis is 0.2 mg/kg bwt/
day, based on an LEL of 63.7 mg/kg bwt/day from a three generation rat 
reproductive study with an uncertainty factor of 300 that demonstrated 
decreased body weight gains and increased liver weights at the high 
dose of 661.8 mg/kg. Flutolanil is classified as a group E carcinogen, 
showing no evidence of cancer in rats or mice.
    The Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution (TMRC) from the 
current

[[Page 33043]]

action is estimated at 0.000810 mg/kg bwt/day and utilizes less than 1 
percent of the RfD for the general population of the 48 States. The 
TMRCs for the most highly exposed subgroups, children (1 to 6 years 
old) is 0.003577 mg/kg bwt/day (1.8% of the RfD).
     The residue analytical method will not be forwarded to FDA for 
publication at this time. This method is available for limited 
distribution from Calvin Furlow, Public Response and Program Resources 
Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide 
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 (703) 305-5232. It has the 
following disclaimer: The method is for use only by experienced 
chemists who have demonstrated knowledge of the principles of trace 
organic analysis; and have proven skills and abilities to run a complex 
residue analytical method obtaining accurate results at the part per 
billion level. Users of this method are expected to perform additional 
method validation prior to using the method for either monitoring or 
enforcement. The method can detect gross misuse.
    There are presently no actions pending against the continued 
registration of this chemical. The pesticide is considered useful for 
the purpose for which the tolerance is sought.
    Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
determined that the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
will protect the public health. Therefore, the tolerance is established 
as set forth below.
    Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
written objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on 
those objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with 
the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy 
of the objections and/or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk 
should be submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The 
objections submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation 
deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 
178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 
CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing 
will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material 
submitted shows the following: There is genuine and substantial issue 
of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence 
identified by the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more 
of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account 
uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the 
factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be 
adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
    A record has been established for this rulemaking under the docket 
number [PP 4F4380 FAP 5H5703/R2240] (including any comments and data 
submitted electronically). A public version of this record, including 
printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include 
any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public Response and 
Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2, 
1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
    <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc938c8cd198939f979988bc998c9d919d9590d2998c9dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5aab5b5e8a1aaa6aea0b185a0b5a4a8a4aca9eba0b5a4eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>
    Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
use of special characters and any form of encryption.
    The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
EPA will transfer any copies of objections and hearing requests 
received electronically into printed, paper form as they are received 
and will place the paper copies in the official rule-making record 
which will also include all comments submitted directly in writing. The 
official rulemaking record is the paper record maintained at the 
address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
(i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, 
grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
    Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
OMB review.
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
(Pub. L. 9-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator has 
determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
do not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities. A certification statement explaining the factual basis 
for this determination was published in the Federal Register of May 4, 
1981 (46 FR 24950).
    Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) of the Administrative Procedure Act 
(APA) as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act of 1996 (Title II of Pub. L. 104-121, 110 Stat. 847), EPA submitted 
a report containing this rule and other required information to the 
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller 
General of the General Accounting Office prior to publication of the 
rule in today's Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as 
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2) of the APA as amended.
    This action does not impose any enforceable duty, or contain any 
``unfunded mandates'' as described in Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), or require prior consultation as 
specified by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October 28, 1993), 
entitled Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership, or special 
consideration as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 
February 16, 1994).

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides

[[Page 33044]]

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 185

    Food additive, Pesticide and pest.

    Dated: April 30, 1996.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.


    2. In Sec. 180.484 by designating the existing text as paragraph 
(a) and by adding a new paragraph (b) to read a follows:


Sec. 180.484  Flutolanil N-(3-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl)-2-
(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and its metabolites converted to 2-
(trifluoromethyl) benzoic acid and calculated as flutolanil; tolerances 
for residues.

* * * * *
    (b) Time-limited tolerances are established for the combined 
residues of the fungicide flutolanil N-(3-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl)-2-
(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and its metabolites converted to 2-
(trifluoromethyl) benzoic acid and calculated as flutolanil in or on 
the following raw agricultural commodities:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Parts per                          
            Commodities               million        Expiration date    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Rice, grain......................          2.0           April 30, 1998
Rice, straw.......................          8.0           April 30, 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------


PART 185--[AMENDED]

    2. In part 185
    a. The authority citation for part 185 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.


    b. In Sec. 185.3385 by designating the existing text as paragraph 
(a) and by adding a new paragraph (b) to read as follows:


Sec. 185.3385  Flutolanil N-(3-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl)-2-
(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and its metabolites converted to 2-
(trifluoromethyl) benzoic acid and calculated as flutolanil; tolerances 
for residues.

* * * * *
    (b) A time-limited food additive regulation is established 
permitting the combined residues of the fungicide flutolanil N-(3-(1-
methylethoxy)phenyl)-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide and its metabolites 
converted to 2-(trifluoromethyl) benzoic acid and calculated as 
flutolanil in or on the following raw processed food commodity:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Parts per                          
            Commodities               million        Expiration date    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rice, hull........................          7.0           April 30, 1998
Rice, bran........................          3.0           April 30, 1998
                                                                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[FR Doc. 96-16338 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F

</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>