alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of iLinc Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"). I, James L.
Dunn, Jr., Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company in respect to those items required
                  to be described or presented in such Report under Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


By: /s/ James L. Dunn, Jr.
---------------------------
James L. Dunn, Jr.
Senior Vice President and
Principal Financial Officer
June 28, 2004
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 44 Filed 04/09/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 44 Filed 04/09/18 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 44 Filed 04/09/18 Page 3 of 3
Compensation Arrangements for the Executive Officers



 Exhibit 10.25 
 Compensation Arrangements for the Executive Officers 
 Set forth below is a summary of the
compensation by SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) to its executive officers in their positions as of the date of filing of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Form 10-K”). All of the Company’s executive officers are at-will employees whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time in the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. 
 Base Salary. Effective January 1, 2009, the executive officers are scheduled to receive the following annual base salaries in their current
positions: 
  

				
	 Name and Current Position
	  	Base Salary
	 Charles Fabrikant, Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	700,000
	 Randall Blank, Senior Vice President
	  	$	375,000
	 James Cowderoy, Senior Vice President
	  	$	335,000
	 Dick Fagerstal, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Finance
	  	$	335,000
	 John Gellert, Senior Vice President
	  	$	365,000
	 Alice Gran, Senior Vice President, Legal Affairs and Risk Management
	  	$	350,000
	 Paul Robinson, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	  	$	350,000
	 Richard Ryan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	350,000
	 Matthew Cenac, Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
	  	$	250,000

 Cash Bonus and Share Incentive Plan. In their current positions, the executive officers are
eligible to: 
  

	 	•	 	 Receive an annual cash incentive award subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. 


  

	 	•	 	 Participate in incentive programs, which currently involve awards of restricted stock and stock options pursuant to SEACOR Holdings Inc.’s 2007 Share Incentive
Plan (Exhibit 10.31 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007). 


 Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements. In their current positions, the executive officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health,
disability and life insurance programs, and a qualified 401(k) plan.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2303** 

ANTHONY PARKER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
SCHAEFFLER GROUP USA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 0:15

- cv - 00521

- DCN )

Submitted : February 16 , 2017 Dec ided: February 21, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Anthony Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine Dudley Helms, Christopher Ray Thomas, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Parker appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint

. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (20 12) . The magistrate judge recommended th at the complaint be dismissed and advised
Parker that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474
U.S. 140 (1985). Parker has waived appellate review by failing to
file timely objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly , we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
33174 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 124 / Wednesday, June 26, 1996 / Notices

comments will become a matter of

public record. Comments are invited on:

(a) Whether the collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

agency, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate

of the burden of the collection of

information; (c) ways to enhance the

quality, utility, and clarity of the

information to be collected; (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on respondents, including

through the use of automated collection

techniques or other forms of information

technology; and (e) estimates of capital

or start-up costs and costs of operation,

maintenance, and purchase of services

to provide information.

Approved: June 17, 1996.

Garrick R. Shear,

IRS Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–16341 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830–01–U

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

Veterans’ Advisory Committee on

Rehabilitation, Notice of Meeting

The Department of Veterans Affairs

gives notice that a meeting of the

Veterans’ Advisory Committee on

Rehabilitation, authorized by 38 U.S.C.,

Section 3121, will be held on July 9, 10,

and 11, 1996, at the Embassy Suites

Hotel, 2333 E. Thomas Road, Phoenix,

Arizona 85016. The committee will

meet from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on July

9 and 10, and from 9 a.m. to 12 noon

on July 11, 1996. The purpose of the

meeting will be to review the

administration of veterans’

rehabilitation programs and to provide

recommendations to the Secretary.

On Tuesday, the Committee will

discuss the re-design initiatives of VA’s

Vocational Rehabilitation and

Counseling Program. On Wednesday

and Thursday, the Committee will

discuss the qualification standards for

the new Vocational Rehabilitation

Counselor position, the Independent

Living Program, and new issues and

projects for future consideration.

The meeting will be open to the

public up to the seating capacity of the

meeting room. Due to changes in the

location of the meeting each day, it will

be necessary for those wishing to attend

to contact Theresa Boyd at 202–273–

7412 prior to July 3, 1996.

Interested persons may attend, appear

before, or file statements with the

Committee. Statements, if in written

form, may be filed before or within 10

days after the meeting. Oral statements

will be heard at 3:30 p.m. on July 10,

1996.

Dated: June 18, 1996.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Heyward Bannister,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–16246 Filed 6–25–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antti WilliamUusiheimala, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Antii William UusiheimalaAntti William UusiheimalaPrincipal Executive OfficerMay __,  2011
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Patrick Bidwill, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Bidwill, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-18-00719-PHX-DLR 

ORDER 

 The Court has an independent duty to determine whether it has subject matter 

jurisdiction over cases before it. See United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed 

Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 967 (9th Cir. 2004). “A federal court is presumed to lack jurisdiction 

in a particular case unless the contrary affirmatively appears.” Gen. Atomic Co. v. United 

Nuclear Corp., 655 F.2d 968 (9th Cir. 1981). Federal courts generally derive jurisdiction 

in one of two ways. Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases (1) arising under federal 

law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or that are between citizens of different states where the amount 

in controversy exceeds $75,000, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff’s complaint does not 

affirmatively allege a basis for federal jurisdiction and none is apparent. Plaintiff accuses 

Defendants of breaching their duties as trustees, which is a purely state law claim. 

Moreover, the complaint indicates that Plaintiff and Defendants all are Arizona residents. 

Complete diversity therefore is lacking. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue his claim, he must 

do so in a state court of competent jurisdiction. For these reasons, 

Case 2:18-cv-00719-DLR Document 5 Filed 03/07/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case. 

 Dated this 6th day of March, 2018. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cv-00719-DLR Document 5 Filed 03/07/18 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT





We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8, SEC File No. 333-127773,
of Linkwell Corporation and the related prospectuses of our audit report dated
March 31, 2009 with respect to the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2008 and the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows of Linkwell Corporation and its subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 2008 appearing in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.





/s/ Sherb
& Co., LLP


Certified
Public Accountants





New
York, New York


April 27,
2009
**Exhibit10.33**

 

**SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT**

 

ROLLER BEARING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., a Delawarecorporation (the “*Company*”), hereby agrees to issue andsell to ROLLER BEARING HOLDING COMPANY, INC. (“*Holdings*”), andHoldings agrees to purchase and pay for 3 shares of Common Stock, par value$0.01 per share, of the Company. Payment of the purchase price of such shares shall be made by Holdingsby delivery to the Company of $3,025,230 against receipt of a certificate orcertificates representing in the aggregate the shares to be issued and sold.

 

Dated as of:  February 6, 2003

 

 
|   | ROLLER BEARING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |
|   | By:                                     | /s/ Michael J. Hartnett |   |
|   |                                    | Michael J. Hartnett |
|   |                                    | President |
|   |                                    |   |
|   |                                    |   |
|   | ROLLER BEARING HOLDING COMPANY, INC.    |
|   |                                    |
|   |                                    |
|   | By:                                     | /s/ Michael J. Hartnett |   |
|   |                                    | Michael J. Hartnett |
|   |                                    | President |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16266]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than July 10, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Clark J. Vollan, Willmar, Minnesota; to acquire an additional 
1.22 percent, for a total of 48.6 percent, of the voting shares of 
Kandi Banc Shares, Inc., New London, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Farmers State Bank of New London, New London, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 20, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-16266 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 65 5- CR J ose Alber

to G UT IER RE Z , Appellant
v. The STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the 290th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CR1186 Honora ble Sharon Mac Rae, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Alma L . L ópez, Chief J ustice

Catherine Stone, Justi ce Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: October 15, 2008 DI SMI SSED The trial c ourt’s ce rtification in t his appea l states t hat t he case is a “plea-ba rg ain case, and the def endant ha s NO rig ht of appe al.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Te x as Rules of Appe llate P roce dure provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a c ertification that shows the defe ndant has a rig ht of appea l has not been ma de par t of the re cord unde r these r ules.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). Appellant’s c ounsel has filed w rit t en n otice with this court that counse l has revie wed the
rec ord and “ can f

ind no rig ht of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indi cation that04
- 08
- 00 65 5- CR

- 2- appellant will not seek to file an am en ded trial c ourt ce rtification showing that he has the rig ht of appea l. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 2 5
. 2 ( d ) ; 3 7
. 1 ; see als o D an ie ls v . S tat e , 1 1 0 S. W. 3 d

1 7 4 , 1 7 7 ( T e x. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). I n light of the re co rd prese nted, we a g ree with appellant’s
c ou ns e l t h a t R

u l e 2 5
. 2 ( d ) r e q u i r e s t h i s c o u r t t o d i s m i s s t h i s a p p e a l
. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h i s a pp e a l is dismiss ed. PER C URI AM DO NO T PU B L I SH
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                   Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios
         (In thousands, except ratio of earnings to fixed charges data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Years Ended December 31,
                               -----------------------------------------------
                                 2000      1999      1998      1997     1996
                               --------  --------  --------  --------  -------
<S>                            <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense on debt.... $ 55,482  $ 45,293  $ 31,930  $ 21,367  $ 6,173
  Capitalized interest........    4,086     1,074       529       --       --
  Interest element of rent
   expense....................    4,462     3,309     2,440     2,053      424
  Fixed charges of
   unconsolidated subsidiary..      --        --        --        --     1,564
                               --------  --------  --------  --------  -------
                               $ 64,030  $ 49,676  $ 34,899  $ 23,420  $ 8,161
                               ========  ========  ========  ========  =======
Earnings:
  Consolidated net loss....... $(70,875) $(54,979) $(34,342) $(10,773) $(3,910)
  Extraordinary loss..........    1,321       --      8,436       508      --
  Preacquisition losses.......      --        --        --        (74)     --
  (Benefit) provision for
   income taxes...............     (512)       94    (6,454)   (3,324)  (1,233)
  Fixed charges...............   64,030    49,676    34,899    23,420    8,161
                               --------  --------  --------  --------  -------
                               $ (6,036) $ (5,209) $  2,539  $  9,757  $ 3,018
                               ========  ========  ========  ========  =======
Ratio of earnings to fixed
 charges......................      --        --        --        --       --
                               ========  ========  ========  ========  =======
Coverage deficiency........... $ 70,066  $ 54,885  $ 32,360  $ 13,663  $ 5,143
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Manhattan Bancorp (the “Company”).

 

I, Jeffrey M Watson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.             The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

2.             The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such reports.

 

 
| Dated: May 13, 2008 |                                   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                     |                                   |
|                     |                                   |
|                     | /s/  Jeffrey M. Watson                 |
|                     | Jeffrey  M. Watson                     |
|                     | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
ex1085.htm


    December
4, 2008

     

    Mr. Roger
T. Staubach

    Executive
Chairman, Americas

    Jones,
Lang, LaSalle Inc.

    15601
Dallas Parkway

    Suite
400

    Addison,
TX 75001

    


    Dear
Roger:

     

    This will
confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2009.

     

    1.           All
director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your
service on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR
Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009, will be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this
letter agreement.

     

    2.           Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures
for Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).

     

    3.           On
the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock
Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid
to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by
the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”)
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any
affiliates, and cease rendering services.  Payment cannot be
accelerated.

     

    4.           In
the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of
death will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the
calendar month immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to Marianne
Staubach.  The payment contemplated by this paragraph 4 will be made
on the 30th
business day following the date of your death.

     

    If the
foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the
originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.

     

    


     

    


    Very
truly yours,

     

     

    /s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly

    Kenneth
W. Wimberly

    Corporate
Secretary

    


    


    


    


    Accepted
and agreed:

    


    


    /s/ Roger
T. Staubach

    Roger T.
Staubach
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of CX2 Technologies., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Rand,  Chief Executive Officer, President, and Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

 (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

Date: October 29, 2008 

 

|   | /s/ Michael Rand                                             |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael Rand,  Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal |
|   | Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer                  |

 

----