alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_3.htm


     

    
      Exhibit
10.3

       

      
        

        

      

      


      NON-NEGOTIABLE

      DEMAND
NOTE

      


      


      


      $1,000,000                                  

               Berwyn,
Pennsylvania

            
July 25, 1997

      


      


      


      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, COMMONWEALTH OF
DELAWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, having a business address of 1160 West
Swedesford Road, Suite 340, Berwyn, PA 19312 (herein referred to as “Maker”),
promises to pay Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation having a business address of 1160 West Swedesford Road, Suite 340,
Berwyn, PA 19341 (hereinafter referred to as “Payee”), on demand, the principal
sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) lawful money of the United States of
America.

      


      The entire unpaid balance of this Note
shall be immediately due and payable on demand.  The principal of this
Note shall bear interest at a rate of six percent (6%) per annum if not paid
when due.

      


      The Maker promises to pay all costs of
collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees, upon default in the payment of
the principal of this when due, whether suit be brought or not.

      


      In the event any one or more of the
provisions contained in this Note shall for any reason be invalid, illegal or
unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability
shall not affect any other provision of this Note, but this Note shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been
contained herein.

      


      This Note is irrevocable and is given
in connection with the public offering of units of limited partnership interests
in the Commonwealth Income & Growth Funds, Pennsylvania limited partnerships
(the “Partnerships”), and no waiver or modification of the terms of this Note
shall be permitted without the prior written consent of Payee and the
Partnership.

      


      This Note shall be governed in all
respects by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and shall be binding
upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto.

      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has caused
this Note to be duly executed the day and year first above written.

      


      


      


      WITNESS:                                                                           COMMONWEALTH
OF DELAWARE, INC.

       

      

        
          
            
              
                	 
      	 
      
	
                          /s/
      Dorothy A. Ferguson

                      	
                         /s/
      George S. Springsteen

                      
	 
      	
                        George
      S. Springsteen, President & Director

                      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                        /s/
      Kimberly A. MacDougall

                      
	 
      	
                        Kimberly
      A. MacDougall, EVP &
Director
Order entered December 6, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01248-CV

CITY OF TERRELL, TEXAS, AND MIKE SIMS, INTERIM CITY MANAGER OF THE 

CITY OF TERRELL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellants

V.

FREDERICK GEORGE EDMONDS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 103352-CC2

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ December 5, 2019 motion to extend the time to file their 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellees’ brief due on or before December 10, 

2019.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Scott Spear,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-003-PHX-DJH

JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the 

reason that the jury has returned its verdict, finding the Defendant not guilty as to Counts 

19-51 and 63-68.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the Court’s Order filed April 23, 

2024, the Defendant is hereby discharged as to Counts 71-78, 85 and 93 of the 

Superseding Indictment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant is hereby 

acquitted and discharged as to these counts only pursuant to Rule 32(k), Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure.

Dated this 23rd day of April, 2024.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2065 Filed 04/23/24 Page 1 of 1
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT M ay 15, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 15462 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 4 - 0 0 0 6 3 - C R - 5 - MC R - MD U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f- A p p e lle e , v ersu s L U I S S A L V A D O R S A U C E D O - G O N Z A L E Z , D e fe n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t ates D i stri ctC ou rt forthe N orthe r n D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( M ay 15, 2006) B efo re T JO F L A T , A N D E R S O N an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: C h e t K au f

m a n , ap p o in te d c o u n s e l fo rL u is S a lv a d o rS au c e d o - G o n z a le z in2

thi s di r e c tc r i m i na lappe a l , ha s m ove d t o w i thdr a w f r om f urthe rr e pr e s e nt a ti on of the appe l l a nta nd f

i l e d abr i e f

pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i for ni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 13 96 , 18 L . E d. 2d 49 3 (19 67 ). O ur i nd ependentre vi ew of the enti re re cord r e v e a ls th a t c o u n s e l’s a s s e s s m e n t o f th e r e la tiv e m e r it o f

th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c aus e i nde pe nde nte xa m i na ti on of the e nti r e r e c or d r e ve a l s no ar guabl e i s s ue s of m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o ti o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , an d S au ce d o -G o n za lez’s conv i cti on and sent ence ar e A FFI R M ED . S auc e do- G onz a l e z ’ s m oti on for ap p o i n tm en to f n ew co u n sel i s DE NI E D a s m o o t.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Richard McKilligan                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard      McKilligan                                                      |
| Chief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting    Officer) |
| May      13, 2010                                                            |

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 16

- 00285

- CR
Michael TALMADGE , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 187th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013CR10180 Honorable Steve Hilbig , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 22, 2016
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION Appellant Michael Talmadge pled no contest to possession of less than one gram of methamphetamine. On Apr il 15, 2014, Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was deferred and he was placed on community supervision. On April 14, 2015, and February 9, 2016, the trial court amended Appellant’s community supervision conditions. Appellant now seeks to appeal from the trial court’s February 9, 2016 order modifying the conditions of his deferred adjudication.
On May 9, 2016 , we notified Appellant that “a n order modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication is not in itself appealable .” Davis v. State , 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex.04

- 16

- 00285

- CR

- 2

- Crim. App. 2006) (citing Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) ) . We ordered Appellant to show cause in writing why his appeal should not be dismi ssed for want of jurisdiction. To date, no response has been filed

. Because the order modifying the terms of Appellant’s deferred adjudication is not an appealable order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Davis , 195 S.W.3d at 711.

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 1 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
     I, Jack P. Healey, Chief Financial Officer of the IndustrialDistribution Group, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to 1 U.S.C. sec. 1350 as adopted by sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)     the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual    period ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”)    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company.
Dated: March 11, 2005
     /s/ Jack P. Healey      Jack P. Healey     Senior Vice President and     Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1211 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

60 School Street, Orchard Park, New York, as the ‘‘Jack F. Kemp 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2009 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 60 School Street, Orchard Park, New York, 

as the ‘‘Jack F. Kemp Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JACK F. KEMP POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 60 School Street, Orchard Park, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jack 

7 F. Kemp Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

2 

•S 1211 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jack F. Kemp Post 

3 Office Building’’. 

Æ 

WWOODS2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
No. 

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

In Re

John Edward Lewis

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

PETITION FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

NOW COMES JOHN EDWARD LEWIS, Relator in this case, by and through

his attorney of record, Keith S. Hampton, and pursuant to Rule 72.1 of the Texas

Rules of Appellate Procedure, moves for leave to file this Petition for Writs of

Mandamus and Prohibition.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Relator praysthat his Motion for

Leave to File Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition, his be in all things

GRANTED.

Respectfully submitted,

 

KEITH S. HAMPTON 

 RECEIVED COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 6/2/2015 ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK 
State Bar No. 08873230

1103 Nueces Street

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 476-8484 (o)

(512) 477-3580 (f)

(512) 762-6170 (c)

keithshampton@gmail.com

ATTORNEY FOR RELATOR

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE: Bymy signature above, I hereby certify that a true

and correct copy of the above and foregoing, Motion for Leave to File Petition for

Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition, has been delivered to the following parties and

interested persons: electronically to Scott.Taliaferro@traviscountytx.gov, and

personally to John Lewis on this day, May 28, 2015.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31210]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15639]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Announcement of Federal Aviation Administration Acquisition 
Management System Standard Clauses and Provisions

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the 
availability of the FAA Acquisition Management System standard clauses. 
This notification facilitates the widest possible distribution and 
availability of the standard clauses to be used in FAA procurement 
contracts and screening information requests (SIRs). The FAA 
Acquisition Policy, Plans and Procedures Division, ASU-100, is 
responsible for configuration control and archive of the FAA contract 
clauses and provisions. Availability of clauses and provisions on the 
Internet and/or through ASU-100 will allow their incorporation by 
reference in FAA procurement actions.

ADDRESSES: The complete text of the FAA Acquisition Management System 
Standard Clauses is available on the Internet at <a href="http://www.faa.gov/
asu.appd/Toolbox.htm">http://www.faa.gov/
asu.appd/Toolbox.htm</a>. Use of the Internet World Web Site is strongly 
encouraged for access to copies of the FAA Acquisition Management 
System. If Internet service is not available, requests for copies of 
the FAA Acquisition Management System Standard Clauses may be made to 
the following address: FAA Acquisition Reform, ASU-100, Rm. 435, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Lankford, Procurement Management Branch, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Rm. 435, 800 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 
20591, (202) 267-7771.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 31, 1995, Congress passed an act, 
Making Appropriations for the Department of Transportation and Related 
Agencies, for the Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 1996, and for Other 
Purposes (The 1996 DOT Appropriations Act). On November 15, 1995, the 
President signed this bill into law. In Section 348 of this law, 
Congress directed the Administrator of the FAA to develop and implement 
a new acquisition management system that addresses the unique needs of 
the agency. The new FAA acquisition management system went into effect 
on April 1, 1996 [see Notice of availability at 61 FR 15155 (April 4, 
1996)]. As part of this system, the FAA has prepared standard clauses 
for inclusion in contracts and screening information requests.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 20, 1996.
Dennis DeGaetano,
Director of Acquisitions, ASU-1.
[FR Doc. 96-15639 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-9 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 12 
EXHIBIT 12 

Objectionable Fees 

Chris Davis Attendance at OU Board of Trustees Meetings 

Date Attorney Time Fee 

11/5/2008 Davis 2.00 $500.00

2/4/2009 Davis 2.00 500.00

4/1/2009 Davis 2.00 500.00

6/3/2009 Davis 2.00 500.00

Grand Total 8.00 $2,000.00

264289
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ORDER ESTABLISHING TRIAL DOCKET FOR THE MONTHS OF JANUARY AND

 FEBRUARY, 2010, BEFORE THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN*

Listed below are the cases on this Court's trial docket for the months of November and

December, 2009. Counsel will be notified when their case reaches No. 5. After such

notice, counsel should be prepared to begin trial any time on 48 hours notice. It is

counsel's responsibility in all cases after they have been so notified to contact my clerk,

Marilyn Orem, at 234-5147, to ascertain the status of the trial docket. Unless otherwise

notified, this Court commences trial at 8:45 a.m. PLEASE BE PROMPT!

1. 08-14136 SHAKOOR V. EVANS, ET.AL

2. 08-14318 CONOCOPHILLIPS V. CONVENIENCE DEPOT, ET.AL

3. 08-14922 FIALKA-FELDMAN V. OAKLAND UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

4. 08-14117 SMITH V. MICHIGAN TUBE SWAGERS & FABRICATORS

5. 09-10981 PFISTER V. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ET.AL

6. 09-11648 EDMUNDS V. BOARD OF CONTROL OF EASTERN MI. UNIVERSITY

7. 09-11366 N&W COMMODITIES V. USA

8. 09-11949 KAID V. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO.

s/Patrick J. Duggan 

Patrick J. Duggan

United States District Judge

Dated: December 1, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record

on December 1, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Marilyn Orem 

Case Manager

*PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT TRIAL WILL NOT BEGIN BEFORE THE FINAL

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE.

IF THERE IS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PENDING, FINAL PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE WILL BE RESCHEDULED APPROXIMATELY 10 DAYS AFTER ANY

DECISION ON SUCH MOTION.

2:08-cv-14318-PJD-DAS Doc # 19 Filed 12/01/09 Pg 1 of 1 Pg ID 114
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 365
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 366
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 367
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 368
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 369
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 370
2:08-cv-14497-AC-DAS Doc # 12-6 Filed 10/27/08 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 371
#### Doris Jean O’NEAL, Respondent, v. Joe Mack O’NEAL, Appellant.

No. 66110.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Jan. 17, 1995.

John P. Heisserer, Cape Girardeau, for appellant.

*778Edward E. Calvin, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Joe Mack O’Neal, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of Cape Girardeau reducing his monthly maintenance payments to respondent, Doris Jean O’Neal, but refusing to terminate the maintenance payments.1 We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). .

1

. Appellant’s motion to strike portions of respondent's brief, which was ordered taken with the case, is sustained. However, keeping in mind the discretion allowed the trial court in matters relating to maintenance, *Osmun v. Osmun,*842 S.W.2d 932, 937 (Mo.App.E.D.1992), our review of the record evidences no abuse of that discretion or error which warrants a reversal of the trial court’s order.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1053 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2010 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the National Law Enforcement Museum Act to 

extend the termination date. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1053 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT MUSEUM ACT. 

2 Section 4(f) of the National Law Enforcement Mu3 seum Act (Public Law 106–492) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘10 years’’ and inserting ‘‘13 years’’. 

Passed the Senate May 7, 2010. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of 511410,
Inc. for the quarter ending April 30, 2005, I, Scott Raleigh, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of 511410, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April
          30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ending April 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
          511410, Inc.

Dated:  June 14, 2005

511410, INC.

By: /s/ Scott Raleigh
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: August 29, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gary S. Lincenberg and Gopi K. 

Panchapakesan, Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant 

Padilla, present; Joy M. Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 1):

8:50 a.m. Court in session. Discussion held re: trial logistics. 9:16 a.m. Recess. 

9:38 a.m. Court reconvenes. 109 prospective jurors present and sworn. Voir Dire begins. 11:22 a.m. 

Prospective jurors exit courtroom. 11:25 a.m. Recess.

12:41 p.m. Court reconvenes. Prospective jurors present. Voir Dire resumes. 1:36 p.m. Prospective 

jurors exit courtroom. Jurors 1-10 escorted to jury room and will be brought forth and questioned 

further, individually. 2:27 p.m. Recess.

2:38 p.m. Court reconvenes. Individual voir dire resumes. 4:21 p.m. Individual voir dire of Jurors 1-

10 completed. Jury released for the evening by Jury Administration. Discussion held with counsel. 

4:46 p.m. Court in recess until Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 8:45 a.m. at which time voir dire will 

resume.

Court Reporter Cathy Taylor/Teri Veres

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 8:58 AM

Stop: 4:46 PM

Total: 5hrs 59 min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1741 Filed 08/29/23 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

COURTNEY RAYMOND CHAMBLISS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1639

[September 30, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 312006CF001064AXXXXX.

Courtney Raymond Chambliss, Chipley, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.