UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

D-4 CECIL FROST,

Defendant.

Case No. 08-20537-4

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION [120]

Before the Court is Defendant Cecil Frost’s pro se Motion for Sentence Reduction [120].

For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED, and Defendant Frost will

be resentenced pursuant to this order.

Procedural History

On October 14, 2008, Defendant was charged with conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine

in the amount of 73.02 grams, and with the distribution of crack cocaine in the amount of 20.31

grams, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 846. On April 27, 2010, Defendant pled guilty

to both these charges. This Court held a sentencing hearing on July 22, 2010. It was established that

Defendant’s sentencing guideline range was 130-162 months based on an offense level of twentyseven and a criminal history category of VI. At the time of Defendant’s sentencing, the count of

conspiracy to distribute cocaine in the amount of 73.02 grams required a mandatory minimum

sentence of ten years. As such, this Court entered a Judgment [98] sentencing Defendant to a total

sentence of 120 months.

Defendant filed its pro se Motion for Sentence Reduction [120] on November 30, 2011. The

Government filed its Response [129] on January 9, 2012. On December 13, 2012, attorney Miriam

L. Siefer filed a Notice of Appearance [160] on behalf of Defendant.

Case 2:08-cr-20537-AJT-MKM ECF No. 164, PageID.766 Filed 05/22/13 Page 1 of 3
2

Analysis

Defendant now seeks retroactive application of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, and a

reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 994(u).

The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 reduced sentences for crack cocaine related drug offenses,

including the mandatory minimum sentences imposed in this case. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)

(increasing the amount of crack from 50 grams to 280 grams to trigger the 10-year mandatory

minimum and from 5 grams to 28 grams to trigger the five-year mandatory minimum). The Sixth

Circuit Court has recently held that this reduction must be applied retroactively to all defendants,

including those defendants sentenced before the passage of the Act. See United States v. Cornelius

Demorris Blewett 12-5226 & Jarreous Jamone Blewett 12-5582, F.3d , 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS

9889, at *3 (6th Cir. 2013). The Sixth Circuit Court specifically rejected the Government’s

objection, also made here, that § 3582(c)(2) prohibits the courts from altering a mandatory minimum

sentence. The court in Blewett held that “[t]he statutory minimums have been reduced and

incorporated into the guidelines by the Sentencing Commission. The old, repealed discriminatory

minimums are no longer a part ‘of the operation of’ the sentencing system. They should not be used

to foreclose ‘lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range.’ Id. at 30 (citing 18 U.S.C. §

3582(c)(2)).

It should be noted that this Court has already granted resentencing in the case of coDefendant Cedarrius Frost, who was charged with and pled guilty to identical counts of conspiracy

to distribute and distribution of crack cocaine. This Court granted resentencing based upon the

Supreme Court’s ruling in Dorsey. The Fair Sentencing Act took effect on August 3, 2010. Based

on this date, the Court in Dorsey held that the Fair Sentencing Act applied to “those offenders whose

crimes preceded August 3, 2010, but who are sentenced after that date.” Dorsey v. United States,

Case 2:08-cr-20537-AJT-MKM ECF No. 164, PageID.767 Filed 05/22/13 Page 2 of 3
3

132 S. Ct. 2321, 2331 (U.S. 2012). Because co-Defendant Cedarrius Frost was sentenced on August

20, 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act may be applied to modify his sentence. The only difference

between co-Defendant Cedarrius Frost and the instant case is that Defendant Cecil Frost was

sentenced prior to August 3, 2010. The Sixth Circuit Court’s ruling in Blewett cures this unjust

outcome.

It also should be noted that Defendant Cecil Frost’s appeal, filed on July 26, 2010, was

pending at the time the Fair Sentencing Act took effect.

Therefore, the revised mandatory minimum sentences of the Fair Sentencing Act must be

retroactively applied in this case. 

Conclusion

For the reasons state above, Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction [120] is

GRANTED.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Sentence Reduction [120] is

GRANTED. Pursuant to this order, Defendant will be resentenced on June 11, 2013 at 2:00 p.m.

SO ORDERED.

s/Arthur J. Tarnow

ARTHUR J. TARNOW

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: May 22, 2013

Case 2:08-cr-20537-AJT-MKM ECF No. 164, PageID.768 Filed 05/22/13 Page 3 of 3