alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-160]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER96-116-000]


Greenwich Energy Partners, L.P.; Notice of Issuance of Order

January 2, 1996.
    On December 18, 1995, as amended November 16, 1995, Greenwich 
Energy Partners, L.P. (Greenwich Energy) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Greenwich Energy will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Greenwich Energy also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Greenwich Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumption of liability by Greenwich Energy.
    On December 20, 1995, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Greenwich Energy should file a motion to 
intervene or protect with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Greenwich Energy 
is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities 
as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any 
security of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption 
is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the 
applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably 
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Greenwich Energy's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is January 19, 1996.
    Copies of the full text of the order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-160 Filed 1-4-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 15.4**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Arcelor S.A.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-107102 on Form S-8 of Mittal Steel Company N.V. (“Mittal”) of ourreport dated April 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Arcelor S.A. and subsidiaries (“the Group”) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated income statement, statement of cash flows, and statement ofchanges in shareholders’ equity for the five months ended December 31, 2006, prepared in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as adopted by the European Union, which report appears in the December 31,2006 annual report on Form 20-F/A of Mittal. 

Our qualified report dated April 16, 2007 contains an explanatory paragraph that states the following:

IAS 34 requires that interim financial statements be represented with comparative financial information. These consolidated interim financial statementshave been prepared solely for the purposes of consolidating the Group into the consolidated financial statements of Mittal as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Accordingly, no comparative financial information is presented. 

Our report dated April 16, 2007 also contains the following explanatory paragraph: 

The consolidated financial statements are based on the historical values of Arcelor S.A.’s assets and liabilities prior to its acquisition by Mittal and, accordingly, do not include the purchase price adjustments to such amountsreflected in the consolidated financial statements of Mittal as a result of such acquisition. 

/s/ **KPMG Audit S. à r.l.**

City of Luxembourg 

Luxembourg 

June 29, 2007
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                   Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios
         (In thousands, except ratio of earnings to fixed charges data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                          ----------------------------------------------
                                           1994    1995      1996      1997       1998
                                          -----  -------  --------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                       <C>    <C>      <C>       <C>        <C>
 
Fixed charges:
  Interest expense on debt                $ 274  $  297   $ 6,173   $ 21,367   $ 32,828
  Capitalized interest                       --      --        --         --        529
  Interest element of rent expense           21      25       424      2,053      2,440
  Fixed charges of unconsolidated
    subsidiary                               --     782     1,564         --         -- 
                                          -----  ------   -------   --------   --------
                                          $ 295  $1,104   $ 8,161   $ 23,420   $ 35,797
                                          =====  ======   =======   ========   ========
 
 
Earnings:
  Consolidated net income (loss)          $ 137  $ (504)  $(3,910)  $(10,773)  $(34,342)
  Extraordinary loss                         --      --        --        508      8,436
  Preacquisition earnings (losses)          236      --        --        (74)        -- 
  Provision (benefit) for income taxes      113    (303)   (1,233)    (3,324)    (6,454)
  Fixed charges                             295   1,104     8,161     23,420     35,797
                                          -----  ------   -------   --------   --------
                                          $ 781  $  297   $ 3,018   $  9,757   $  3,437
                                          =====  ======   =======   ========   ========
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges         2.65      --        --         --         --
                                          =====  ======   =======   ========   ========
 
Coverage Deficiency                         N/A  $  807   $ 5,143   $ 13,663   $ 32,360
 
</TABLE>


                                      11
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:        May 17, 2010 | /s/ Todd      Hays                                            |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Todd      Hays                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|                                | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
**EXHIBIT 31.01****CERTIFICATION**I, Joseph L. Cowan, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interwoven, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Dated: December 14, 2007 /s/ Joseph L. Cowan   Joseph L. Cowan   Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gregory J. Kuykendall, Bar # 012508

Amy P. Knight, Bar # 031374

KUYKENDALL & ASSOCIATES

531 S Convent Avenue

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 792-8033

greg@kuykendall-law.com

amyknight@kuykendall-law.com

Pro Bono Attorneys for Defendant Scott Daniel Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT DANIEL WARREN,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No.CR-18-00223-001-TUC-RCC(BPV)

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY 

RE MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Defendant, Scott Daniel Warren, Ph.D., by and through his pro bono attorneys 

undersigned, Gregory J. Kuykendall, and Amy P. Knight, respectfully moves the 

Court for a one-week extension of time to file a reply to the government’s response 

to his Motion to Suppress Evidence Found as a Result of Illegal Search. The motion 

was filed April 19, 2018; the government filed its response May 3, 2018. The reply 

is currently due May 10, 2018. Defendant’s new requested due date is May 17, 2018. 

A status conference at which a hearing will be scheduled is set for May 11, 2018.

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 64 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The defendant requires the requested extension because counsel is out of town 

until May 9, 2018, and will not be able to complete review of the government’s 

response and the necessary research and investigation prior to the current May 10 

due date. 

The assigned U.S. Attorney has been contacted and has no objection to this 

motion. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 7th day of May, 2018.

By /s/ Gregory J. Kuykendall

Gregory J. Kuykendall

Amy P. Knight

531 S Convent Avenue

Tucson, AZ 85701

Attorneys for Defendant Scott 

Daniel Warren

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on May 7, 2018, I electronically transmitted a PDF version of 

this document to the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF System for filing and for 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants: 

Nathaniel J. Walters, Esq. (email: Nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov) 

Anna R. Wright, Esq. (email: anna.wright@usdoj.gov) 

United States Attorney’s Office 

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, AZ 85701

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 64 Filed 05/07/18 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JULIAN VINCENT CROSBY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 466 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned officer of Radio One, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date:March 15, 2006     By: /s/ Scott R. Royster       Name: Scott R. Royster  Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  *A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to RadioOne, Inc. and will be retained by Radio One, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 1 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 2 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion ma y contain computer-generated errors or other 3 deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 4 filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 FRANCES TORRES, 7 Petitioner-Appellee, 8

v. NO. 30,111 9 JOSEPH TORRES, 10 Respondent-Appellant, 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY 12 Sheri A. Raphaelson, District Judge 13 Brigitte Lotze law Office 14 Brigitte Lotze 15 Toas, NM 16 for Appellee 17 Kelan Emery 18 Taos, NM 19 Helen L. Bennett 20 Albuquerque, NM 21 for Appellant 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION 23 FRY, Chief Judge. 242 Respondent appeals several rulings in this domestic relations matter. In this 1 Court’s notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to dismiss for lack of 2 a final order. Respondent has filed a memorandum in support of our proposed 3 summary dismissal of the case, as well as a motion that asks the Court to retain the 4 record proper for use in any appeal thatis filed once a final order is entered. 5 We dismiss this appeal for lack of a final order and we grant Respondent’s 6 motion to retain the record proper. As this appeal has been dismissed, in any 7 subsequent appeal Respondent may wish to f ile, he will have to file a new notice of 8 appeal and docketing statemen t, and will have to supplem ent the record in accordance 9 with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 13 WE CONCUR: 14

15 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge 16

17 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge 18
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00276

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding 141st District Court of Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141

- 327449

- 21

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### J ENNIFER 

### T REGER 

### , T ODD 

### D ANIEL 

### , AND 

### K ERRI 

### R EHMEYER 

### , Relator s2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relat or s’ “ P etition for Imm e diate W rit of Inju n ction ”

and “ Emer gency M otion for Temporary R elief Pending Determination of Petition for
Writ of Inju nction ” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,

relator s’ “ P etition for Imm e diate W rit of Inju n ction ” and “ Emer gency M otion for
Temporary R elief Pending Determination of Petition for Writ of Inju nction ” a re

denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : Se ptember 9, 2021
**Exhibit
        No. 32.1**
  CERTIFICATION
  Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, the undersigned officer of BoomJ, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies
        based on his knowledge that:
 
 (i)  the
        accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
        ended
        September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
        the
        date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        as
        amended; and
 
 (ii)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
        for
        the periods covered in the Report.
  November
                  14, 2008
              /s/
                  Robert J. McNultyRobert
                  J. McNulty, Principal Executive OfficerNovember
                  14, 2008
              /s/
                  Mark V NoffkeMark
                  V. Noffke, Principal Financial
                  Officer
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging,
        or
        otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
        electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
        been
        provided to BoomJ, Inc. and will be retained by BoomJ, Inc. and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission as an Exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be considered filed
        as
        part of the Form 10-Q.
  -26-
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Clarence DAVIS, Appellant. Clarence DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. WD 50067, 51338.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 21, 1996.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 2, 1996.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Attorney General, Kansas City, for Respondent.

Jarrett A. Johnson, Asst. Appellate Defender, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and HANNA and SPINDEN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Davis appeals from convictions for burglary, § 569.160, RSMo. (1986), and stealing a credit card, § 570.030, RSMo. (1986), and from sentences as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent sentences of twenty and seven years. The appeal taken on denial of relief under Rule 29.15 is deemed abandoned. Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15431]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OJP (NIJ) No. 1086]
RIN 1121-ZA38


National Institute of Justice Solicitation for Policing Research 
and Evaluation: Fiscal Year 1996

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 
National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Announcement of the availability of the National Institute of 
Justice ``Solicitation for Policing Research and Evaluation: Fiscal 
Year 1996''

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: There are two deadlines for receipt of proposals. Those 
submitted in response to the locally-intiated partnerships section are 
due by close of business on August 15, 1996. All others are due by 
close of business on July 22, 1996.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tawana Waugh, U.S. Department of 
Justice Response Center, at 800-421-6770 (in Metropolitan Washington, 
DC, 202-307-1480).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following supplementary information is 
provided:

    Authority: This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime 
Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, sections 201-203, as amended, 
42 U.S.C. 3721-3723 (1988).

Background

    The National Institute of Justice is soliciting a second year of 
proposals for policing research and evaluation responsive to the Public 
Safety Partnership and Community Policing Act (Title I) of the Violent 
Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. Interested organizations 
should call the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) at 
1-800-851-3420 to obtain a copy of ``Solicitation for Policing Research 
and Evaluation: Fiscal Year 1996'' (refer to document No. SL000148). 
The solicitation is available electronically via the NCJRS Bulletin 
Board, which can be accessed via Internet. Telnet to 
ncjrsbbs.ncjrs.org, or gopher to ncjrs.org:71. For World Wide Web 
access, connect to the NCJRS Justice Information Center at <a href="http://
www.ncjrs.org">http://
www.ncjrs.org</a>. Those without Internet access can dial the NCJRS 
Bulletin Board via modem: dial 301-738-8895. Set modem at 9600 baud, 8-
N-1.
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 96-15431 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P