alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16425]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Revocation of License; Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Order of the United States District 
Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, dated November 4, 1987, the 
United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the license 
of Investment Capital Inc., a Oklahoma Corporation, to function as a 
small business investment company under the Small Business Investment 
Company License No. 06/10-0133 issued to Investment Capital Inc. on 
Novemeber 8, 1963 and said license is hereby declared null and void as 
of January 16, 1996.

United States Small Business Administration.

    Dated: June 20, 1996.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 96-16425 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 26, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16255]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463 as amended), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Steering Subcommittee of the Labor Advisory Committee for Trade 
Negotiations and Trade Policy.
    Date, time and place: July 10, 1996, 10:00 am-12:00 noon, U.S. 
Department of Labor, Room S-1011, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20210.
    Purpose: The meeting will include a review and discussion of 
current issues which influence U.S. trade policy. Potential U.S. 
negotiating objectives and bargaining positions in current and 
anticipated trade negotiations will be discussed. Pursuant to section 
9(B) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) it 
has been determined that the meeting will be concerned with matters the 
disclosure of which would seriously compromise the Government's 
negotiating objectives or bargaining positions. Accordingly, the 
meeting will be closed to the public.
    For further information contact: Fernand Lavallee, Director, Trade 
Advisory Group or Jorge Perez-Lopez, Director, Office of International 
Economics Affairs, Phone: (202) 219-4752.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of June, 1996.
Joaquin Otero,
Deputy Under Secretary, International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 96-16255 Filed 6-25-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-28-M
Amendment to Offer Letter to Ajita G. Rajendra dated February 25, 2009



 Exhibit 10(i) 
 

 
 February 25, 2009 
 Mr. Ajita G. Rajendra 
 President 
 A. O.
Smith Water Products Company, 
 a division of A. O. Smith Corporation 
 500 Tennessee Waltz Pkwy 
 Ashland City, TN 37015-1299 
  

	Re:	Amendment to Offer Letter 

 Dear Ajita: 
 This letter confirms our agreement to amend your offer letter dated September 20, 2004 (“Offer Letter”) with respect to your pension
supplement. To resolve an open issue dating back to your date of hire related to pension forfeited at your former company, the following replaces item 4, Pension Supplement, in your Offer Letter: 
  

	 	4.	Pension Supplement. With completion of 10 years of service with A. O. Smith, you will be eligible for an $85,000/year supplement paid as a straight life annuity commencing
with your retirement from A. O. Smith. 

 If you have any questions about this, please feel free to contact me. 
  

	
	Best Regards,
	
	 /s/ Mark A. Petrarca

	Mark A. Petrarca
	Senior Vice President
	Human Resources and Public Affairs
exv10w22






Exhibit 10.22



Resolution approved on December 30, 2008 by Michele A. Carlin, Corporate Vice
President, Rewards pursuant to delegation adopted by the Motorola Compensation and
Leadership Committee on December 15, 2008




     NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that each outstanding Restricted Stock Unit
Award Agreement awarded under the Motorola Omnibus Incentive Plan of 2006, shall
be amended, effective December 31, 2008, to include the following provision at the
end thereof:


Notwithstanding any provision in this Award to the contrary, if the Grantee is a
“specified employee” (within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section
1.409A-1(i) and using the identification methodology selected by Motorola from
time to time) on the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment, any payment
which would be considered “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning
of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),
that the Grantee is entitled to receive upon termination of employment and which
otherwise would be paid or delivered during the six-month period immediately
following the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment will instead be paid
or delivered on the earlier of (i) the first day of the seventh month following
the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment, and (ii) the Grantee’s death.
Notwithstanding any provision in this Award that requires the Company to pay or
deliver payments with respect to Units upon vesting (or no later than March
15th of the year following the year in which the applicable Units
vest), if the event that causes the applicable Units to vest is not a permissible
payment event as defined in Section 409A(a)(2) of the Code (or if the event is a
permissible payment event but requires the Grantee to provide continued services
for a certain period of time following such permissible payment event), then the
payment with respect to such Units will instead be paid or delivered on the
earlier of (i) the specified date of payment or delivery originally provided for
such Units, or (ii) the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment (subject
to any delay required by the first sentence of this paragraph). For purposes of
determining the time of payment or delivery of any payment the Grantee is entitled
to receive upon termination of employment, the determination of whether the
Grantee has experienced a termination of employment will be determined by Motorola
in a manner consistent with the definition of “separation from service” under the
default rules of Section 409A of the Code.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

2 East Congress Street, Suite 1000

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 622-6900

Michael L. Piccarreta

State Bar No. 003962

Email: mlp@pd-law.com

Attorney for Defendant Andrew Padilla

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

6. Andrew Padilla,

 (Counts 1-51)

 Defendant.

NO. CR-18-00422-06-PHX-SPL

DEFENDANT ANDREW PADILLA’S 

REPLY TO UNITED STATES’

RESPONSE (DOC. 466) TO 

DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR 

DESIGNATION OF 39 DOCUMENTS 

SUBJECT TO THIS COURT’S 

DESTRUCTION ORDER TO BE 

PRESERVED AS PART OF THE IN 

CAMERA RECORD IN THIS 

PROSECUTION

Defendant, Andrew Padilla, by and through his undersigned attorney, hereby replies 

to the United State’s Response (Doc. 466) To Defendants’ Joint Motion For Designation Of 

39 Documents Subject To This Court’s Destruction Order To Be Preserved As Part Of The 

In Camera Record In This Prosecution (Doc. 453). Defendants’ joint motion stated that 

“Defendants are in the process of destroying the 39 documents.” (Doc. 453, p. 2). 

Undersigned counsel’s email to the government dated February 7, 2019, (Doc. 466-1, 

Exhibit D), was notice to the government of Mr. Padilla’s compliance with the Court’s order 

to destroy the documents. Mr. Padilla hereby provides notice to this Court that the documents 

have been destroyed. However, as it is constitutional error for the government to withhold 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 468 Filed 02/20/19 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Brady material from the defendant, the destroyed documents must be preserved as part of 

the record for later review in this case or appellate review, if necessary.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 20th day of February, 2019.

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

By: /s/ Michael L. Piccarreta

Michael L. Piccarreta

Attorney for Andrew Padilla

On February 20, 2019, a PDF version

of this document was filed with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF

System for filing and for Transmittal

of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the

following CM/ECF registrants:

Reginald Jones: Reginald.Jones@usdoj.gov

Peter S. Kozinets: Peter.Kozinets@usdoj.gov

John Kucera: John.Kucera@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: Margaret.Perlmeter@usdoj.gov

Kevin Rapp: Kevin.Rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: Andrew.Stone@usdoj.gov

Thomas Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Paul Cambria: pcambira@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Bruce Feder: bfeder@federlaw.com

James Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

Michael D. Kimerer, mdk@kimerer.com

Gary Lincenberg: glincenberg@birdmarella.com

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 468 Filed 02/20/19 Page 2 of 2
| 1. | The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| June 21, 2010 |   |                                                            |   |
|---------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|          |   | /s/ Christopher P. Chambers                                     |   |
|          |   | Christopher P. Chambers                                         |   |
|          |   | Title: Executive Vice President andPrincipal Accounting Officer |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RICHARD SOLDAN,

Plaintiff, Case no. 08-14401

Honorable John Corbett O’Meara

v.

MICHAEL J. BOUCHARD, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub’s Report and

Recommendation, filed November 22, 2010, as well as any objections thereto filed by the

parties, and being fully advised in the premises;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is ADOPTED by this

Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ April 27, 2010, Motion to Dismiss and/or

for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ request for an award of costs and fees is

DENIED.

s/John Corbett O’Meara 

United States District Judge

Date: December 21, 2010
2

I hereby certify that on December 21, 2010, a copy of the foregoing document was served

upon counsel of record using the ECF system, and upon Plaintiff at 10489 Runyan Lake Point,

Fenton, MI 48430 by first-class U.S. mail.

s/William Barkholz 

Case Manager
#### Dennis R. TURNBAUGH, Employee-Respondent, v. EXCALIBUR PACKAGING & DESIGN, Employer-Appellant, and General Accident Group, Insurer-Appellant.

No. 65724.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Nov. 29, 1994.

Evans & Dixon, Patrick A. Patterson, St. Louis, for appellant.

Andrew H. Marty, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J,, and CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Employer, Excalibur Package & Design, and insurer, General Accident Group, appeal from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of claimant, Dennis Tumbaugh in this workers’ compensation case.

The decision of the Labor and Industrial Relation Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
#### Louis and Carolyn SHELBURNE, Appellants, v. John CLEVELAND, Respondent.

No. WD 47924.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 14, 1994.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 2, 1994.

Keith G. Liberman, St. Louis, for appellants.

Jeffrey O. Parshall, Columbia, for respondent.

*833Before SMART, P.J., and KENNEDY and ULRICH, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM:

Louis and Carolyn Shelburne appeal from an order dismissing their petition on grounds of *res judicata*and lack of jurisdiction.

Judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Bruce M. Jaffe, the chief financial
officer of LogicVision, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of
section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the
best of my knowledge,

(i) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| | /s/ BRUCEM. JAFFE    | 
| | -------------------- | 
| | Bruce
      M. Jaffe
| |                     
| | March
      21, 2008

---
EXHIBIT
32
















CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT




















The
certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Ross Harbottle, President and
Principal Accounting Officer of Sidewinder Explorations Inc. hereby certifies
that:





1.
the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Sidewinder Explorations Inc.











Date:  July
23,
2008                                     SIDEWINDER
EXPLORATIONS INC., Registrant




/s/ Ross
Harbottle


By: Ross Harbottle, President and
Principal Accounting Officer
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard McKilligan                                               |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard McKilligan                                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| May 16, 2011                                                         |   |

----
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 1996 / Sunshine Act Meetings 2581

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF

GOVERNORS

Notice of a Meeting

The Board of Governors of the United

States Postal Service, pursuant to its

Bylaws (39 C.F.R. Section 7.5) and the

Government in the Sunshine Act (5

U.S.C. Section 552b), hereby gives

notice that it intends to hold a meeting

at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, February 6,

1996, in Houston, Texas. The meeting is

open to the public and will be held at

the Four Seasons Hotel, 1300 Lamar

Street, Houston, in the Austin Room.

Due to the blizzard and extreme weather

conditions that hit Washington, D.C., on

Sunday, January 7, the Board meeting

scheduled for January 8 and 9 was

cancelled. (See 60 FR 67021, December

27, 1995) The Board expects to discuss

the matters stated in the agenda which

is set forth below. The agenda includes

the items that were scheduled for the

January meeting. Requests for

information about the meeting should

be addressed to the Secretary of the

Board, Thomas J. Koerber, at (202) 268–

4800.

There will also be a session of the

Board on Monday, February 5, 1996, but

it will consist entirely of briefings and

is not open to the public.

Agenda

Tuesday Session

February 6–9:00 a.m. (Open)

1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting,

December 4–5, 1995.

2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and

CEO. (Marvin Runyon)

3. Consideration of Board Resolution on

Capital Funding. (Chairman Sam

Winters)

4. Annual Report on Government in the

Sunshine Act Compliance. (Chairman

Sam Winters)

5. Quarterly Report on Service Performance.

(Yvonne D. Maguire, Vice President,

Consumer Advocate)

6. Quarterly Report on Financial

Performance. (Michael J. Riley, Chief

Financial Officer and Senior Vice

President)

7. Report on Southwest Area Operations.

(Charles K. Kernan, Vice President,

Southwest Area Operations)

8. Capital Investments. (All for final

consideration)

a. Tray Management System—Phase II

Development. (William J. Dowling, Vice

President, Engineering)

b. Low Cost Optical Character Reader. (Mr.

Dowling)

c. 47 Small Parcel and Bundle Sorters. (Mr.

Dowling)

d. Associate Office Infrastructure R&D.

(Richard D. Weirich, Vice President,

Information Systems)

e. Jacksonville, Florida, Bulk Mail Center

Expansion. (Rudolph K. Umscheid, Vice

President, Facilities)

f. El Paso, Texas, P&DC and VMF. (Mr.

Umscheid)

9. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman

of the Board of Governors.

10. Tentative Agenda for the March 4–5,

1996, meeting in Washington, D.C.

Thomas J. Koerber,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–1567 Filed 1–24–96; 3:06 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710–12–M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2023

NO. 03-22-00629-CR

Dwayne Chance Chadwick, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES KELLY AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
HEDSTROM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                     EARNINGS PER SHARE DISCLOSURE
                 For the year ended December 31, 1998
                        (Dollars in thousands)
                                 Income       Shares       Share
                               (Numerator)  (Denominator)  Amount
                               -----------   -----------   ------
Basic Earnings Per Share:
  Net loss                     $ (6,727)       67,663       $(0.10)

Effect of Dilutive Securities:
   Stock options in the money        --            --           --
   Buyback of shares at
    average price of $1.13           --            --           --
                               --------        ------       ------
   Net effect of stock options       --            --           --
                               --------        ------       ------
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
  Net income                   $ (6,727)       67,663       $(0.10)
                               =========       ======       ======

Options to purchase 4,772,128 shares of common stock at a range of $1.00-$1.65
per share were outstanding at December 31, 1998 but were not included in the
computation of diluted EPS as inclusion of stock options would have been
antidilutive.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KELLY SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-CV-14253

KIMBERLY D. BODDIE,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On October 6, 2008, Plaintiff filed its complaint and “Motion for Temporary

Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction” in the above-captioned matter. 

Having reviewed the motion, the court has determined that the requirements for

issuing a temporary restraining order under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) are not met in

this case. Plaintiff’s motion and complaint fail to establish that “immediate and

irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result . . . before the adverse party or that

party’s attorney can be heard in opposition.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1). Defendant

will be allowed time to prepare a brief in response to the motion for preliminary

injunction. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s “Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

and Preliminary Injunction” is DENIED IN PART. Specifically, it is DENIED with

respect to the request for a temporary restraining order. 
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\08-14253.KELLY_SVCS.DenyTRO.wpd

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff immediately serve this motion on

Defendant. Defendant is DIRECTED to file an RESPONSE to the motion by

October 20, 2008.

Finally, IT IS ORDERED that the court will conduct a preliminary injunction

hearing on October 23, 2008 at 9 a.m. Plaintiff and defendant’s representative

with full settlement authority are required to appear.

s/Robert H. Cleland 

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: October 7, 2008

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of

record on this date, October 7, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Lisa G. Wagner 

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522