FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT A U G U ST 24, 2007 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 15863 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C . D o c k e tN o . 0 1 - 0 6 5 0 4 - C V - C MA B R U C E S I M M O N S , P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , R e s p o n d e n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 24, 2007) B efo re D U B IN A , B L A C K an d M A R C U S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: A ppe l l a ntB ruc e S i m m ons , af e de r a l pr i s one rpr oc e e di ng p ro se , appe a l s the2

d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is “M o tio n f

o rC o u rt to V a c a te F in e o rA lte rn a tiv e lyto S e taP a y m e ntS c he dul e , ” c ons true d a s a28 U . S . C . § 2241 habe a s pe t i t i on c ha l l e ngi ng the f

i ne port i on of

S i m m ons ’ s s e nt e nc e s on tw o c ount s of c oc a i ne di stri bu t i on , i n v i ol at i on of 21 U . S . C . § 8 41 (a )( 1). S i m m ons a rgue s tha t , be c aus e the B ur e au of P r i s ons ( “ B O P ” ) s e t s hi s f i ne paym entthrou gh the Inm at e F i nanci al R es po nsi bi l i ty P rogram , the di stri ctcourt i m pe rm i s s i bl yde l e ga t e d i t s j udi c i a l author i tyt o the B O P. S i m m ons r e l i e s on U n ite d S ta te s v . P ro u ty , 3 0 3 F .3 d 1 2 4 9 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . A lth o u g h h e d e s c r ib e s h is c ha l l e nge a s a n a tt a c k on the e xe c ut i on of hi s s e nt e nc e , S i m m ons m a ke s no a rgum e ntothe rtha n i m pr ope rde l e ga t i on. We r e v i e w de no vo th e a v a ilab ilityo f h ab e a s r e lie f

u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 4 1 . D oh rm an n v. U

ni ted Stat es , 44 2 F . 3d 12 79 , 12 80 (11th C i r. 20 06 ). A pr i s one rw ho f

a i l s t o c ha l l e nge am one t a ryj udgm e nta ts e nt e nc i ng oron di re ctappeal cann otchal l enge thi s penal ty f or the fi rs tt i m e i n a col l at er al p r o c e e d in g , ab s e n t e x c e p tio n a l c ir c u m s ta n c e s . D ohrm ann , 442 F . 3d a t1280- 81 (di sc ussi ng a c ol l at er al chal l enge t o an o rderof re st i tut i on ). E xcept i on al ci rc um st ance s “ ar e anal og ou s t o a show i ng of cause and prej ud i ce t o o verc om e a p r o c e d u r a l d e f

au lt f o rr a is in g ac la im f

o rth e f ir s t tim e in ah ab e a s c o rp u s p e titio n . I d. a t1281.3

W hi l e S i m m ons c ha r a c t e r i z e s hi s a r gum e nta s a n a tt a c k on the e xe c ut i on of hi s s e nt e nc e , ac ha r ge of i m pr ope rde l e ga t i on c ha l l e nge s the va l i di tyof the s e n te n c e its e lf

. See P r o u ty , 3 0 3 F .3 d a t 1 2 5 4 - 5 5 ; M athe nyv . Morr is on , 307 F . 3d 7 0 9 , 7 1 1 - 1 2 ( 8 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . T h e r e c o r d d e m o n s tr a te s th a t S im m o n s f a ile d to c ha l l e nge the c ons t i tut i ona l i tyof hi s f i ne a ts e nt e nc i ng oron di r e c tappe a l , a nd he m a k e s n o a tte m p t to s h o w e x c e p tio n a l c ir c u m s ta n c e s ju s tif y in g th is f

a ilu r e . A c c o r d in g ly , h e c a n n o t m a k e s u c h ac h a lle n g e n o w . See D ohrm ann , 44 2 F . 3d at 1 2 8 0 -8 1 . B ec au se w e c o n clu d e th at th e d istrict co u rt co rr ec tl y d en ied S im m o n s’s § 2 24 1 p et i t i on , w e a ff

i rm the court ’ s order . AF F I RME D.