alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1030 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the reduction 

in the credit rate for certain facilities producing electricity from renewable resources. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2009 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate 

the reduction in the credit rate for certain facilities producing electricity from renewable resources. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF REDUCED CREDIT RATE FOR 

4 PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY FROM CER5 TAIN FACILITIES. 

6 Subparagraph (A) of section 45(b)(4) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following new sentence: ‘‘The preceding sentence shall 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•S 1030 IS

1 not apply to electricity produced and sold after the date 

2 of the enactment of this sentence.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







The
undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
(the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/
James B. Wiegand


James B.
Wiegand


Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


January
14, 2010
secondamendgasdirectdefcomp.htm


    
      Nicor Gas
Company

      Form
10-K

      Exhibit 10.09

      
 

      SECOND
AMENDMENT

      TO

      NORTHERN
ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY

      DIRECTORS’
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

       

      WHEREAS,
Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas Company (the “Company”) previously
established the Northern Illinois Gas Company Directors’ Deferred Compensation
Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”);
and

       

      WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for a one time election to
receive in-service distributions.

       

      NOW
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new Section
11:

       

      “SECTION
11. One Time Withdrawal Election. Notwithstanding anything contained in this
Plan to the contrary, a Director may prior to December 31, 2008 file pursuant to
the election permitted under Section 2 for 2008, a one-time election to have all
or any portion of the balance of his deferred compensation account as of
December 31, 2008 (plus interest and dividend equivalents thereon) distributed
and paid out to him in a lump sum on May 1, 2009 (the “Payment Date”). Such
election shall include whether such distribution will be from amounts credited
with the interest equivalent option or the share unit option. If such an
election is made and the Director’s deferred compensation account is credited
with the interest equivalent under Section 3.3, then such Directors’ deferred
compensation account shall be credited with interest through the date
immediately prior to the Payment Date. If the Directors’ deferred compensation
account is denominated in share units, then such share units shall be converted
to the cash equivalent based on the closing market composite price for the
Company’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transactions on the last trading day prior to the Payment Date. Any election
under this Section 11 shall not apply to any amounts credited to a Director’s
deferred compensation account for retainers or meeting fees for service in 2009.
An election to receive a partial distribution of a Director’s deferred
compensation account under this Section 11, shall not impact a Director’s
election as to the manner and date of payment of the remaining portion of the
Director’s deferred compensation account. A Director who receives full payment
of his deferred compensation account pursuant to an election under this Section
11 and who subsequently elects to defer compensation under this Plan, shall in
such subsequent deferral election under Section 2, specify the manner and date
on which the Director elects to receive payment of the amount to be so deferred
under Subsection 3.1.”

      


      FURTHER,
this Second Amendment to the Plan shall be effective on the date approved by the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.

       

      In all
other respects the Plan, as amended by the First and Second Amendments thereto
shall remain in full force and effect.
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KARP & WEISS, P.C.

3060 North Swan Road

Tucson, Arizona 85712-1225

Telephone (520) 325-4200

Facsimile (520) 325-4224

Stephen M. Weiss

PCC No. 61412

State Bar No. 002261

sweiss@karpweiss.com

Adam C. Page

PCC No. 66148

State Bar No. 025015

apage@karpweiss.com

Attorneys for Defendant Joye Vaught

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

 v.

7. JOYE VAUGHT

Defendant

 2:18-CR-00422-SPL 

 (CR-18-422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

JOINDER IN DEFENDANT 

PADILLA’S MOTION FOR 

ITEMIZATION OF BRADY/GIGLIO

MATERIAL

The Defendant Joye Vaught, by and through her attorney Stephen M. Weiss, 

hereby joins in Defendant Padilla’s Motion for Itemization of Brady/Giglio Material

and adopts the positions set forth in said Motion as if fully set forth herein. The issues 

raised by Defendant Padilla in said Motion apply with equal force to Defendant Vaught.

DATED this 21st day of August, 2018.

KARP & WEISS, P.C.

By /s/ Stephen M. Weiss 

Stephen M. Weiss

Attorney for Defendant Vaught

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 275 Filed 08/21/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 6th day of June, 2018, I electronically transmitted 

the foregoing Joinder in Defendant Padilla’s Opposition to Government’s Motion to 

Disqualify Counsel on behalf of Joye Vaught to the Clerk of the Court by filing with the 

CM/ECF system and understand a copy of the filing will be emailed to the following 

CM/ECF registrants:

Honorable Steven P. Logan: logan_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov

Kevin M. Rapp: kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov

Dominic William Lanza: dominic.lanza@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

John J. Kucera: john.kucera@usdoj.gov

Reginald E. Jones: reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

Peter Kozinets: peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: andrew.stone@usdoj.gov

Paul Cambria: pcambria@lglaw.com

Bruce S. Feder: bf@federlawpa.com

James C. Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

K. C. Maxwell: kmaxwell@bgrfirm.com

Michael D. Kimerer: MDK@kimerer.com

Michael L. Piccarreta: mlp@pd-law.com

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Tom Bienert: tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 275 Filed 08/21/18 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1066 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1066

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve access to 
             ambulance services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2009

 Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Conrad, Ms. 
 Landrieu, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to preserve access to 
             ambulance services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Ambulance Access 
Preservation Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT RETENTION OF ACCESS TO GROUND AMBULANCE SERVICES IN 
              RURAL AND URBAN AREAS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1834(l)(13) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(l)(13)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Temporary''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
                ``and before January 1, 2010'';
                    (B) in clause (i), by inserting ``, or 6 percent if 
                such service is furnished on or after January 1, 2010'' 
                after ``2010''; and
                    (C) in clause (ii), by inserting ``, or 6 percent 
                if such service is furnished on or after January 1, 
                2010'' after ``2010''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B), by adding at the end the following 
        new sentence: ``The preceding sentence shall not apply to 
        payments for services furnished on or after January 1, 2010.''

SEC. 3. PERMANENT RETENTION OF ACCESS TO AMBULANCE SERVICES IN SUPER 
              RURAL AREAS UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    Section 1834(l)(12)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(l)(12)(A)) is amended by striking ``and before January 1, 
2010,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher TYLER, Appellant.

No. 62245.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Gary E. Brotherton, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Hatfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and PUDLOWSKI and SIMON, JJ.

*860
      *ORDER*

Appellant, Christopher Tyler, appeals from a jury trial conviction on one count of first degree assault and one count of armed criminal action entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
10

11

121314

151617

18

19

2021222324

2526

27

28

Tel: (949) 369-3700; Fax: (94) 369-3701

Attorneys for Defendant James Larkin

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, ) CR-_ 18-00422-SPL

Plaintiff,

vs.James Larkin, et al

Defendant.

WAIVER OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE)

AT ARRAIGNMENT AND ENTRY OFl

"NOT GUILTY" PLEACOURT'S ACCEPTANCE OF WAIVER)

[RULE 10(b), Fed. R. Crim. P.]

The Defendant in the above case acknowledges and agrees to the following:

1.1 have received a copy of the a Indictment (B Superseding) a Information against

me. My lawyer has discussed the charges with me and has answered all questions I have sofar. I waive reading of the charges against me.

2. My true and correct name is/is not as indicated on the Indictment/Information.

My true name is:_James Larkin

(Print True Name)

3. I understand I have the right to personally appear in open court on these charges.

By signing this waiver, I give up my right to personally appear in open court for an

arraignment.

///
5

67

8

9

1011

1213

14

15161718

19

202122

23

242526

2728

DATE: August 1,2018

/ Defsfr a^r

I am the attorney for the aboye-named pefenda^ I haveTt^Tlewed the charges against myclient and agree with the "Waiver ofA^pearanc)^Ar£%^nment."

DATE: August 1,2018 /s/ Thomas H. Bienert, Jr.

Attorney for Defendant

The Court accepts "Waiver of Defendant's Appearance at Arraignment" and enters a plea

of "Not Guilty" for the Defendant.

DATE:

United States Magistrate Judge

Waiver of Personal Appearance at Arraignment

and Entry of "Not Guilty" Plea

Page Two - 2 -
5

7

8

9

10

11121314

15

16171819

20

212223242526

2728

6

/s/ Torn Thomas

to the attorneys of record.

Toni Thomas
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                       |  |                  |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                       |  | Percentage Owned |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Heritage Bank          |  | 100%             |  | United States                
|HopFed Capital Trust I |  | 100%             |  | Delaware                     



SUBSIDIARIES OF
HERITAGE BANK



|                            |  |                  |  |                             
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                            |  | Percentage Owned |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation
|Fall & Fall Insurance, Inc. |  | 100%             |  | Kentucky
CV-18-555-PHX-DLR-MHB

Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00555-DLR Document 37 Filed 07/27/18 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit D

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 269-4 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 269-4 Filed 08/17/18 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 269-4 Filed 08/17/18 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 269-4 Filed 08/17/18 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 269-4 Filed 08/17/18 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 269-4 Filed 08/17/18 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of DDi Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mikel H. Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ MIKEL H. WILLIAMSMikel H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: February 29, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company") for the three month ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger Crystal, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: December 14, 2010                           By: /s/ Seijin Ki


Seijin Ki


Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit**  No. 20 - 50716 **consolidated with No. 20**  **- 50719**  Summary Calendar **United States of America,** Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Gaspar Bernal -**  **Bernal,** Defendant
— Appellant **.** Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20 - CR - 61 - 1 USDC No. 4:20 - CR - 16 - 1 Before **Davis, Stewart,** and **Dennis,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** * Gaspar Bernal - Bernal appeals the 14 - month within - guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 23, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-50716 Document: 00515754186 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/23/2021No. 20 - 50716 c/w No. 20 - 50719

2 removal from the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also appeals the concomitant revocation of his probation term related to his prior conviction for illegal reentry. Raising one issue on appeal, Bernal - Bernal argues that his new illegal reentry sentence, imposed under § 1326(b)(1), violates his due process rights by exceeding the two - year statutory max imum set forth in § 1326(a) because the indictment did not allege a prior conviction necessary for the § 1326(b)(1) enhancement. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 226 - 27 (1998), and he seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The Government filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance agreeing that the issue is foreclosed and, in the alternative, a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. As the Government argues, and Berna l - Bernal concedes, the sole issue raised on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez - Torres . See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625 - 26 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the issue is foreclos ed, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Although the appeals of Bernal - Bernal’s illegal reentry conviction and probation revocation were consolidated, he does not address the revoca tion in his appellate brief. Consequently, he has abandoned any challenge he could have raised to the revocation or revocation sentence. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224 - 25 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirman ce is **GRANTED** , and the judgments of the district court are **AFFIRMED** . The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is **DENIED** . Case: 20-50716 Document: 00515754186 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/23/2021
EXHIBIT 2B

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-3 Filed 03/12/19 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-3 Filed 03/12/19 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 498-3 Filed 03/12/19 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB

ORDER

Based on the government’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Third Request), and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the motion and extending the deadline for

the United States to respond to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Indictment (doc. 561) from 

May 29, 2019 to June 12, 2019.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) is 

found to commence from _________________ through __________________.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 612-1 Filed 05/24/19 Page 1 of 1
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Supreme Foodservice GmbH ) ) Under Contract No. SPM300-05-D-3130 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59487

Daniel P. Graham, Esq. Philip J. Davis, Esq. Tyler E. Robinson, Esq.

Wiley Rein LLP Washington, DC Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA ChiefTrial Attorney Kristin K. Bray, Esq. John F. Basiak, Jr., Esq. Corinne Foley Petersen, Esq. Kari L. Scheck, Esq.

Trial Attorneys DLATroop Support Philadelphia, PA ORDER OF DISMISSAL Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation ofDismissal with Prejudice, dated 19 May 2015, this appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 21 May 2015


## coministrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59487, Appeal ofSupreme Foodservice GmbH, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 HENRY D. DEATON , 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3
v. NO. 33,111 4 SANDRA V. FRY, MOISES GUTIERREZ, 5 AURORA CALDWELL, and ANY AND 6 ALL Unknown Claimants of Interest in 7 the Premises Adverse to Plaintiff, 8 Defendants-Appellees. 9 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 10 Clay Campbell, District Judge 11 Chappell Law Firm, P.A. 12 Bill Chappell, Jr. 13 Michael Hoeferkamp 14 Albuquerque, NM 15 for Appellant 16 Mark A. Glenn 17 Albuquerque, NM 18 for Appellee Fry 19 Roibal Law Firm PA 20 Edward J. Roibal 21 Albuquerque, NM 222 for Appellee Gutierrez 1 Narciso Garcia, Jr. 2 Albuquerque, NM 3 for Appellee Caldwell 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION 5 VIGIL, Judge. 6 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 7 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 8 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 9 {2} DISMISSED. 10 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 11

_______________________________ 12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 13
WE CONCUR: 14

___________________________________ 15 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 16

_________________________________ 173 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 1