alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-87213, No. 333-43042, No. 333-91426, No. 333-109191, No. 333-126649) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2002 CEO Option Plan, and Milestone Equity Incentive Plan of Scientific Learning Corporation of our report dated February 15, 2006 with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Scientific Learning Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.  **/s/
    Ernst & Young LLP** San Francisco, California March 8, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 890 Introduced in House (IH)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 890

 Welcoming the Prime Minister of the Republic of India, His Excellency 
               Dr. Manmohan Singh, to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2009

Mr. McDermott (for himself, Mr. Royce, Mr. Ackerman, and Mr. Burton of 
Indiana) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Welcoming the Prime Minister of the Republic of India, His Excellency 
               Dr. Manmohan Singh, to the United States.

Whereas the Republic of India achieved its independence from the British Empire 
        on August 15, 1947, and has since maintained a democratic system of 
        government;
Whereas from April 16 to May 13, India conducted the world's largest democratic 
        election, which returned Prime Minister Singh to power;
Whereas India's relationship with the United States has deepened in past years 
        and encompasses cooperation on matters relating to international 
        security, world trade, technology, science, and health;
Whereas the relationship between the United States and India has great potential 
        to promote stability, democracy, prosperity, and peace throughout the 
        world and enhance the ability of both countries to work together to 
        provide global leadership in areas of mutual concern and interest;
Whereas the Prime Minister of India, His Excellency Dr. Manmohan Singh, has 
        helped shape India's economic policies to permit the expansion of a 
        market economy, which has led to greater economic prosperity for India 
        and the growth of a middle class;
Whereas Americans of Indian origin have made diverse and numerous contributions 
        to the United States; and
Whereas Prime Minister Singh has accepted an invitation by the United States to 
        make an official visit to Washington, DC, and is the honoree of 
        President Barack Obama's first State Dinner: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the maturating of the relationship between the 
        United States and the Republic of India, exemplified by the 
        current official visit of the Prime Minister of India, His 
        Excellency Dr. Manmohan Singh;
            (2) looks forward to continuing progress in the 
        relationship between the United States and India; and
            (3) welcomes Prime Minister Singh to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
ex10_o-19.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10-O-19

    


    

     

     

    
      
        	 
      	
                World
      Headquarters, Room 538

              
	 
      	
                One
      American Road

              
	 
      	
                Dearborn,
      MI 48126-2798

              
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                [Date]

              


      

    

    


    Dear
[Name],

    


    In
recognition of Company, CBG, and individual performance in [Year], and in
anticipation of your continued leadership and ongoing efforts in [Year], the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved the following
incentive compensation for you:

    


    [Year] Performance-Based
Restricted Stock Units (PB-RSU) and Stock Options – Annual
Grant

    


    The total
value of your [Year] stock-based award is delivered through 50%
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) and 50% stock
options:

    


    Total
value:

    


    
      	
              Performance-Based
      RSU value:

            	
              [     ]

            


    

    
      	
              Number
      of Performance-Based RSUs:

            	
              [     ]

            


    

    


    
      	
              Stock
      option value:

            	
              [     ]

            


    

    
      	
              Number
      of stock options:

            	
              [     ]

            


    

    


    The
number of performance-based RSUs and stock options is based on the FMV of
[    ] and Black-Scholes value of
[     ] on [Date of Grant] truncated to the nearest
whole share.

    


    The
performance-based RSU grant is a maximum opportunity having a [one/two/three-]
year performance period, after which the Compensation Committee will determine
the final RSU award based on performance-to-objective on the following
metrics:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              •

            	
              [Describe
      applicable metrics]

            


    

    


    The final
RSU award will be restricted for [one/two/three-] years.  As soon as
practicable after the restriction lapses, you will be issued shares of Ford
Motor Company Common Stock, less shares withheld to cover any tax liability on
the value of the grant.

    


    All
stock-based awards are subject to the terms of the [1998/2008] Long-Term
Incentive Plan.  Additional information regarding all of your
stock-based awards is available on HR ONLINE.  If you have further
questions regarding your awards, please contact [Name] at [Phone
Number].

    


    Thank you
for all your efforts and continued leadership.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Estate of * From the County Court at Law

Mildred L. Ethridge, deceased, of Midland County

Trial Court No. P10778.

No. 11-17-00291-CV * October 31, 2019

 * Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the orders below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the orders of the trial court are in all things affirmed. The costs 

incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Fred D. Davis Jr.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1164 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Automated 

Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 2, 2009 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Automated Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Automated 

5 Defibrillation in Adam’s Memory Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT. 

7 Section 312 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 244) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (c)(6), after ‘‘clearinghouse’’ 

10 insert ‘‘, that shall be administered by an organizaVerDate Nov 24 2008 23:10 Jun 02, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1164.IS S1164

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 1164 IS

1 tion that has substantial expertise in pediatric edu2 cation, pediatric medicine, and electrophysiology and 

3 sudden death,’’; and 

4 (2) in the first sentence of subsection (e), by 

5 striking ‘‘fiscal year 2003’’ and all that follows 

6 through ‘‘2006’’ and inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal 

7 years 2003 through 2014’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Hardesty 

b.lot 

Parraguirre 

preliminary injunction is moot because the foreclosure sale has been 

completed. See Personhood Nevada v. Bristol, 126 Nev. _ 245 P.3d 

572, 574 (2010). 

Concerning appellant's quiet title cause of action, this claim is 

properly dismissed against these respondents because they no longer have 

an interest in the property. Therefore, they are not proper defendants in a 

quiet title action.' See Schwob v. Hemsath, 98 Nev. 293, 294, 646 P.2d 

1212, 1212 (1982) (holding that the legal owner of a property was a 

necessary party to an action adjudicating title to the property). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

'The district court dismissed appellant's quiet title cause of action 

after finding that he lacked standing. Viewing the facts in the light most 

favorable to appellant, it appears that he had standing to assert the quiet 

title cause of action because he alleged that he was a co-owner of the 

property. Nevertheless, because appellant did not name the proper 

parties in seeking to quiet title in this action and he has since filed a 

separate quiet title action against the purchaser of the property, dismissal 

of this cause of action was proper. Rosenstein v. Steele, 103 Nev. 571, 575, 

747 P.2d 230, 233 (1987). 

21n light of this order, we deny Montessa, LLC's February 21, 2013, 

motion to consolidate this case with Centento v. Montessa, LLC, Docket 

No. 62506. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge 

Martin Centeno 

Houser & Allison, APC 

Tiffany & Bosco, P. A. 

Greenberg Traurig, LLP/Las Vegas 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

3
VI 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 120 

For the relief of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law or any order, for the purposes of the Immigra6 tion and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Denes 

7 Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop shall be deemed to have been 

8 lawfully admitted to, and remained in, the United States, 

9 and shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or 

10 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi11 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255). 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 120 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the applications for issuance 

3 of immigrant visas or the applications for adjustment of 

4 status are filed with appropriate fees not later than 2 

5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

6 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

7 Upon the granting of immigrant visas to Denes Fulop and 

8 Gyorgyi Fulop, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

9 proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or subse10 quent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that 

11 are made available to natives of the country of birth of 

12 Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop under section or 203(a) 

13 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

14 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

15 visas that are of birth of Denes Fulop and Gyorgyi Fulop 

16 under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT TARA MINERALS CORP. Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the transition report of Tara Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Francis Richard Biscan, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Clifford A. Brown, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.   Date:   August19, 2009 /s/ Francis Richard Biscan Francis Richard Biscan, Principal Executive Officer   Date:   August  19, 2009 /s/ Clifford A. Brown Clifford A. Brown, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.56.2


 


AMENDMENT
NUMBER ONE TO


THE
COCA-COLA EXPORT CORPORATION


INTERNATIONAL
THRIFT PLAN


AS
AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 2007


 


WHEREAS, Section 6.1
of The Coca-Cola Export Corporation International Thrift Plan, as amended and
restated effective October 1, 2007 (the “Plan”) provides that the
International Benefits Administrative Committee (the “Committee”) has the
authority to amend the Plan; and


 


WHEREAS, the Committee
wishes to amend the Plan.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Plan
hereby is amended as follows:


 


Effective August 1,
2008, Section 3.2 (Deemed Investment of Accounts) shall be amended to add
the following sentence at the end of the section:


 


“No hypothetical
dividends shall be credited to a Member’s Account after death, Disability or Separation
from Service.”


 


Except as
specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as
prior to this Amendment One.


 


	
   

  	
  INTERNATIONAL BENEFITS

  ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Susan M. Fleming

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  10/2/08
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the transition report of Tara Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Francis Richard Biscan, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Clifford A. Brown, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.   Date:   May 14, 2009 /s/ Francis Richard Biscan Francis Richard Biscan, Principal Executive Officer   Date:   May14, 2009 /s/ Clifford A. Brown Clifford A. Brown, Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                RELIANT BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                JURISDICTION OF
SUBSIDIARY                                                                                                      INCORPORATION 
----------                                                                                                      ---------------
<S>                                                                                                              <C>
Alpine Industries, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Washington

Care Free Aluminum Products, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Michigan

CFA Holding Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Delaware

RBP of Arizona, Inc.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Delaware

RBP Custom Glass, Inc.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Delaware

RBP Fenesco, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Delaware

RBP of Texas, Inc.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Delaware

RBP Trans, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  Delaware

Ultra Building Systems, Inc.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  New Jersey
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20262

VERNON KING, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BRYAN COLLIER; WARDEN TONY R. CHARE; WARDEN CHRISTOPHER 

LACOX; WARDEN GHEFF H. PRESTWOOD; MURRAY OWEN, MBA; 

JULYE ERNISTINE, M.D.; MOTT KHARA, M.D.; ELDON L. MONK; M. 

HENKEMEYER, R.N.; J. HORNS, Licensed Vocational Nurse; BOYCE, 

Licensed Vocational Nurse; C. MCCAULEY, Licensed Vocational Nurse; S. 

MADL, Licensed Vocational Nurse; SCOTT, R.N.; RUSSELL, R.N.; CAPTAIN 

R. COOK; MAJOR M. B. CROW; LIEUTENANT C. A. APPLEWHITE; 

SERGEANT J. JACKSON; OFFICER S. GRANT; OFFICER HENRY,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:16-CV-943

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Vernon King, Jr., Texas prisoner # 590316, moves this court for 

authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 10, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20262 Document: 00513946210 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2017
No. 16-20262

2

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. King has failed to show that he 

should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) or that 

his appeal of the district court’s judgment presents a nonfrivolous issue. See

Banos v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 

562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). King’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied.

The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextricably intertwined with 

the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th 

Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed as 

frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. King’s motion to stay proceedings is denied as 

moot.

IFP DENIED; STAY DENIED AS MOOT; APPEALS DISMISSED.

 Case: 16-20262 Document: 00513946210 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2017
**EXHIBIT 32.01**     The following certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-8238 are being“furnished” to the Securities and Exchange Commission rather than “filed” either as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure statement, and are not to be incorporated by reference into theAnnual Report on Form 10-K or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoingcertifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16060]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application To Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Abatix Environmental Corp., Common Stock, $0.001 Par 
Value) File No. 1-10184

June 19, 1996.
    Abatix Environmental Corp. (``Company'') has filed an application 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant 
to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and 
Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the Boston 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, as of the April 30, 1996, the Company had 
2,088,964 shares of Security outstanding. The Security constitutes the 
sole class of voting securities of the Company. Each share of Security 
entitles the holder thereof to one vote on all matters to come before a 
meeting of stockholders.
    The trades of the Company's Security on the BSE since 1989 have 
been minimal. In addition to the indirect costs (filing of period 
reports, etc.) related to being listed on the BSE, the Company pays 
$1,000 per year in direct fees.
    The Security is currently listed on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market tier 
of The Nasdaq Stock Market. The issuer cannot justify the expense of 
being listed on an exchange and the Nasdaq SmallCap system and thereby, 
wishes to withdraw from the BSE.
    Any interested person may, on or before July 11, 1996 submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16060 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M