33414 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 125 / Thursday, June 27, 1996 / Proposed Rules

with submission of any tenders or other rate

schedules. The carrier agrees to also advise

MTMC of any change in address prior to the

effective date of the change. Failure to do so

is grounds to discontinue use of the carriers.

c. Carrier understands that tenders

inadvertently accepted and distributed for

use and not in compliance with this

agreement, the provisions contained in the

Standard Tender of Freight Services (MT

Form 364–R), or the application MNC Freight

Traffic Rules Publication, and supplements

thereof, will be subject to immediate removal

or non-use until corrections are made. The

issuing carrier will be advised when tenders

are removed under these circumstances.

14. Rates. a. Carrier agrees to transport

shipments at the lowest tender rate

specifically applicable to the department or

agency involved.

b. The carrier’s rates must be on file with

MTMC, HQ Eastern Area, ATTN: MTE–IN,

Bayonne, New Jersey 07002–5302. The

carrier must publish all rates, charges, and

accessorial services on a ‘‘Department of

Defense Standard Tender of Freight Services’’

MT Form 364–R and must comply with the

tender preparation instructions. (Only

services annotated with a charge in the

tender will be paid by the shipper.)

15. Carrier Performance. Carrier agrees that

carrier’s equipment, performance and status

of service will conform with its obligations

under Federal, State and local law and

regulation as well as with the guidelines

found in the Defense Traffic Management

Regulation (DTMR) and this Agreement. The

carrier fully understands its obligation to

remain current in its knowledge of service

standards. The carrier accepts the

Government’s right to revoke approval,

declare ineligible, non-use, or disqualify the

carrier for unsatisfactory service for any

operating deficiency, noncompliance with

the terms of this Agreement or terms of any

negotiated agreements, tariffs, tenders, bills

of lading or similar arrangements

determining the relationship of the parties, or

for the publication of unreasonable rates,

charges, rules, descriptions, classifications,

practices, or other unreasonable provisions of

tariffs/tenders. Rules governing the Carrier

Performance Program are found in MTMC

Regulation 15–1, and Army Regulations 55–

355 DTMR. If a carrier is removed or

disqualified for 6 months or more, it will

have to be re-qualified.

16. General Provisions. The carrier must

possess a valid Standard Carrier Alpha Code

(SCAC). When a company holding the

appropriate authority has operating

divisions, each with its own unique SCAC,

each such division is required to execute a

separate agreement with MTMC governing

the transportation of protected commodities.

17. Terms of the Agreement. a. The terms

of this Agreement will be applicable to each

shipment.

b. This agreement shall be effective from

the date of approval by MTMC, until

terminated. Termination is effective upon

receipt of written notice by either party.

c. Nothing in this Agreement will be

construed as a guarantee, by the Government,

of any particular volume of traffic.

d. The carrier agrees to immediately notify

MTMC of any changes in ownership, in

affiliations, executive officers, and/or board

members, and carrier name. Carrier

understands that failure to notify MTMC

shall be grounds for immediate revocation of

the carrier’s approval and their participation

in the movement of DOD freight.

18. Additional Specialized Requirements.

The terms of this Agreement will not prevent

different or additional requirements with

respect to negotiated agreements or added

requirements for other types of service and/

or commodities.

19. Inquiries. Inquiries may be referred to:

Commander, MTMC, Attn: MTOP–QQ, Falls

Church, Virginia 22041–5050.

20. Carrier Acknowledgment and

Acceptance. The certifying carrier official

agrees to ensure that the appropriate

company officials and employees are familiar

with the requirements, terms and conditions

of this Agreement and are in full compliance

with the applicable provisions herein. Any

information found to be falsely represented

in the Motor Carrier Qualification Form, the

attachments or during the qualification

procedures, to include additional

requirements of this Agreement, shall be

grounds for automatic revocation of this

Agreement and immediate non-use of the

carrier, the affiliated companies, division and

entities, I,

llllllllllllllllllll,

verify under penalty of perjury under the

laws of the United States of America, that the

information contained in the carrier

qualification application packet and this

Agreement is true, correct and complete. If

representing a company or organization, I

certify that I am qualified and authorized to

offer this information. I know that willful

misstatements or omissions of material facts

constitute Federal criminal violations

punishable under 18 U.S.C. 1001 by up to 5

years imprisonment and fines up to $10,000

for each offense, or punishable as perjury

under 18 U.S.C. 1621 by fines up to $2,000

or imprisonment up to 5 years for each

offense. Further, I understand the

requirements of this Agreement and on

behalf of:

llllllllllllllllllll

(Typed Name of Carrier and MC Number)

agree to comply with the terms and

conditions contained herein.

lllllllllllllllllllll

(Signature of Carrier Official and Title)

Signature of Agent Official and Title:

lllllllllllllllllllll

lllllllllllllllllllll

Date: llllllllllllllllll

Address: llllllllllllllll

Telephone Number: (llllllll) ll

24-Hr Emergency Number: llllllll

(llllllll)

Interstate Operating Authority Certificate

Number—MC: llllllllllllll

Intrastate Operating Authority: llllll

Certificate Number(s) Include: llllll

Issuing State—For Example: lllllll

PA—#12345

Military Traffic Management Command

Acknowledgment/Acceptance

Signature and Title:

lllllllllllllllllllll

Date Approved: lllllllllllll

Gregory D. Showalter,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 96–16147 Filed 6–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[GA–30–3–9615b; FRL–5519–1]

Approval and Promulgation of

Implementation Plans; Approval of

Revisions to the State Implementation

Plan; Georgia

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is approving the State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision

submitted by the State of Georgia

through the Department of Natural

Resources, Environmental Protection

Division (GA EPD) for the purpose of

deleting the volatile organic compound

(VOC) reasonably available control

technology (RACT) rule for

Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners. In the

final rules section of this Federal

Register, the EPA is approving the

State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule

without prior proposal because the

Agency views this as a noncontroversial

revision amendment and anticipates no

adverse comments. A detailed rationale

for the approval is set forth in the direct

final rule. If no adverse comments are

received in response to that direct final

rule, no further activity is contemplated

in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA

receives adverse comments, the direct

final rule will be withdrawn and all

public comments received will be

addressed in a subsequent final rule

based on this proposed rule. The EPA

will not institute a second comment

period on this document. Any parties

interested in commenting on this

document should do so at this time.

DATES: To be considered, comments

must be received by July 29, 1996.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this

action should be addressed to Scott M.

Martin at the EPA Regional Office listed

below.

Copies of the documents relative to

this action are available for public

inspection during normal business

hours at the following locations. The

interested persons wanting to examine

these documents should make an

appointment with the appropriate office

at least 24 hours before the visiting day.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 125 / Thursday, June 27, 1996 / Proposed Rules 33415

Air and Radiation Docket and

Information Center (Air Docket 6102),

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, 401 M Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460.

Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4, Air Programs Branch, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365.

Air Protection Branch, Georgia

Environmental Protection Division,

Georgia Department of Natural

Resources, 4244 International

Parkway, Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia

30354.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott M. Martin, Regulatory Planning

and Development Section, Air Programs

Branch, Air, Pesticides & Toxics

Management Division, Region 4

Environmental Protection Agency, 345

Courtland Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia

30365. The telephone number is 404/

347–3555, X4216. Reference file GA–

30–3–9615.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For

additional information see the direct

final rule which is published in the

rules section of this Federal Register.

Dated: April 19, 1996.

A. Stanley Meiburg,

Acting Regional Administrator.

[FR Doc. 96–16342 Filed 6–26–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

40 CFR Part 60

[AD–FRL–5525–5]

RIN 2060–AG33

Standards of Performance for New

Stationary Sources for Nonmetallic

Mineral Processing Plants;

Amendments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule and notice of

public hearing.

SUMMARY: This action proposes

revisions and clarifications to several

provisions of the standards of

performance for nonmetallic mineral

processing plants, which were

promulgated in the Federal Register on

August 1, 1985 (50 FR 31328). On

January 26, 1995, the National Stone

Association petitioned EPA to review

the existing standards. These revisions

are in keeping with President Clinton’s

Regulatory Reinvention Initiative. The

intended effect of this action is to

reduce the costs of emission testing and

reporting and recordkeeping. The

affected industries and numerical

emission limits remain unchanged

except for individual, enclosed storage

bins.

A public hearing will be held, if

requested, to provide interested persons

an opportunity for oral presentation of

data, views, or arguments concerning

the proposed revised standards.

DATES: Comments. Comments must be

received on or before August 26, 1996.

Public Hearing. If anyone contacts

EPA requesting to speak at a public

hearing by July 23, 1996, a public

hearing will be held on August 5, 1996

beginning at 10 a.m. Persons interested

in attending the hearing should call Ms.

Cathy Coats at (919) 541–5422 to verify

that a hearing will be held.

Request to Speak at Hearing. Persons

wishing to present oral testimony must

contact EPA by July 23, 1996 (contact

Ms. Cathy Coats at (919) 541–5422.)

ADDRESSES: Comments. Comments

should be submitted (in duplicate if

possible) to: The Air and Radiation

Docket and Information Center (MC–

6102), ATTN: Docket No. A–95–46, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, 401

M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.

Commenters wishing to submit

proprietary information for

consideration should clearly distinguish

such information from other comments,

and clearly label it ‘‘Confidential

Business Information.’’ Submissions

containing such proprietary information

should be sent directly to the following

address, and not to the public docket, to

ensure that proprietary information is

not inadvertently placed in the docket:

Attention: Mr. William Neuffer, c/o Ms.

Melva Toomer, U.S. EPA Confidential

Business Information Manager, OAQPS/

MD–13; Research Triangle Park, North

Carolina 27711. Information covered by

such a claim of confidentiality will be

disclosed by the EPA only to the extent

allowed and by the procedures set forth

in 40 CFR Part 2. If no claim of

confidentiality accompanies a

submission when it is received by the

EPA, the submission may be made

available to the public without further

notice to the commenter.

Docket. Docket No. A–95–46,

containing supporting information used

in developing the proposed revisions is

available for public inspection and

copying between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00

p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Air

and Radiation Docket and Information

Center (MC–6102), U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone (202)

260–7548, fax (202) 260–4000. A

reasonable fee may be charged for

copying.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

William Neuffer at (919) 541–5435,

Emission Standards Division (MD–13),

U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North

Carolina 27711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulated Entities

Entities potentially regulated by

EPA’s final action on this proposed rule

are new, modified, or reconstructed

affected facilities in nonmetallic mineral

processing plants. These categories and

entities include:

Category Examples

Industry .... Crushed and broken stone, sand

and gravel, clay, rock salt,

gypsum, sodium compounds,

pumice, gilsonite, talc and

pyrophyllite, boron, barite,

fluorospar, feldspar, diatomite,

perlite, vermiculite, mica,

kyanite processing plants

This table is not intended to be

exhaustive, but rather provides a guide

for readers regarding entities likely to be

regulated by final action on this

proposal. This table lists the types of

entities that EPA is now aware could

potentially be regulated by final action

on this proposal. Other types of entities

not listed in the table could also be

regulated. To determine whether your

facility is regulated by final action on

this proposal, you should carefully

examine the applicability criteria in

§ 60.670 of the rule. If you have

questions regarding the applicability of

this action to a particular entity, consult

the person listed in the preceding FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

The information presented in this

preamble is organized as follows:

I. Background

II. Summary and Rationale for Proposed

Revisions to NSPS

III. Administrative Requirements

A. Public Hearing

B. Docket

C. Clean Air Act Procedural Requirements

D. Office of Management and Budget

Reviews

1. Paperwork Reduction Act

2. Executive Order 12866

3. Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

E. Regulatory Flexibility Act Compliance

I. Background.

Standards of performance for

nonmetallic mineral processing plants

were promulgated in the Federal

Register on August 1, 1985 (50 FR

31328). These standards implement

section 111 of the Clean Air Act and

require all new, modified, and

reconstructed nonmetallic mineral

processing plants to achieve emission

levels that reflect the best demonstrated

system of continuous emission