alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.01****CERTIFICATION**I, Martin W. Brauns, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interwoven, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: March 13, 2006  /s/ MARTIN W. BRAUNS     Martin W. Brauns    Chief Executive Officer
2. This Amendment along with the Employment Agreement constitute the sole and entireagreements of the parties relating to the subject matter contained therein. To the extent there isany inconsistency between this Amendment and the Employment Agreement, the provisions of thisAmendment shall be controlling.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forthabove.         **“EMPLOYER”:**   **“EMPLOYEE”:**         **CHROMADEX, INC.,**    a California corporation             By:/s/ Frank Jaksch   /s/ Thomas C Varvaro       Its:     THOMAS C VARVARO        
 
2
| (1)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cody Resources, Inc. for the quarter                ended February 28, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended February 28, 2007, fairly presents in all material                respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Cody Resources,                Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Donald L. Sampson                                                         |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Donald                L. Sampson                                                                   |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  April                16, 2007                                                                      |
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 31006]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15519]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917

[Docket No. FV95-916-4C]


Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Revision of Handling 
Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches

AGENCY: Agriculutural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Interim final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the interim final rule 
published on March 27, 1996, concerning nectarines and peaches grown in 
California.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Johnson, Marketing Specialist, Marketing Order Administration 
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, Room 
2523-S, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2861; or Terry 
Vawter, Marketing Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, 
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Division, 
AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California, 93721; 
telephone: (209) 487-5901.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    This rule revises handling requirements for California nectarines 
and peaches under Marketing Orders 916 and 917 for the 1996 season. 
This interim final rule enables handlers to continue shipping fresh 
nectarines and peaches meeting consumer needs in the interest of 
producers, handlers, and consumers of these fruits.

Need for Correction

    In the interim final rule, FR Doc. 96-7438, published March 27, 
1996, the Royal Glo nectarine variety was inadvertently placed under 
the incorrect minimum size requirement and is in need of correction.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, in FR Doc. 96-7438, page 13392, first column, the 
words ``Royal Glo'', are removed from Sec. 916.356(a)(6) and added to 
Sec. 916.356(a)(4) immediately following the words ``Rose Diamond.''

    Dated: June 12, 1996.
Robert C. Keeney,
Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
[FR Doc. 96-15519 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-M
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1081 

To prohibit the release of enemy combatants into the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the release of enemy combatants into the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELEASE OR TRANSFER OF COVERED INDIVID4 UALS. 

5 (a) COVERED INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In this sec6 tion, the term ‘‘covered individual’’ means any individual 

7 who— 

8 (1) has ever been determined by a Combatant 

9 Status Review Tribunal to be an enemy combatant 

10 (pursuant to the definition employed by that triVerDate Nov 24 2008 01:40 May 22, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1081.IS S1081

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 1081 IS

1 bunal) or is awaiting the determination of such a tri2 bunal; 

3 (2) is in the custody of the United States at 

4 Guantanamo Bay, Cuba on or after the date of en5 actment of this Act; and 

6 (3) is not a citizen of the United States or an 

7 alien admitted for permanent residence in the 

8 United States. 

9 (b) COVERED INDIVIDUALS ORDERED RELEASED.— 

10 (1) IN GENERAL.—No court shall order the re11 lease of a covered individual into the United States. 

12 (2) VISAS AND IMMIGRATION.—The Secretary 

13 of State may not issue any visa, and the Secretary 

14 of Homeland Security may not admit or provide any 

15 type of status, to a covered individual that permits 

16 the covered individual to enter into, or be admitted 

17 to, the United States. 

18 (c) TRANSFER.— 

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—If a covered individual is no 

20 longer held by the United States as an enemy com21 batant, the covered individual shall be released into 

22 the custody of the Secretary of Homeland Security, 

23 who shall transfer the individual to the covered indi24 vidual’s country of nationality or to another country. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 1081 IS

1 (2) HOUSING.—An individual in the custody of 

2 the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to 

3 paragraph (1) shall be housed separately from aliens 

4 detained as enemy combatants by the Department of 

5 Defense in a manner consistent with the safety and 

6 security of United States personnel. 

7 (3) TRANSFER.—Transfers made pursuant to 

8 paragraph (1) shall be carried out as expeditiously 

9 as possible and in a manner that is consistent 

10 with— 

11 (A) the policy set out in section 2242 of 

12 the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 

13 Years 1998 and 1999 (8 U.S.C. 1231 note); 

14 and 

15 (B) the national security interests of the 

16 United States. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

s0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

145433 & (25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145433

COA: 307480

Wayne CC: 01-003031-01

JUAN WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of February 6, 2013, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the 

application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals. On order 

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again 

considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Burt v Titlow, cert gtd 185 L Ed 

2d 360; 2013 US LEXIS 1849; 81 USLW 3470 (US 2013), is pending before the United 

States Supreme Court, and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
## NO. 12

- 21

- 00019

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JOHN BARNETT

, APPE L LANT

V.

THOMAS C. BRIGHT, JAMES
MCANDREW, CHARLES DICKSON, J.
LEONARD DECARLO, ROBERT CLAY
WILLIAMS AND UROLOGY TYLER,

P.A.

, APPELLEE S §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellan t

, John Barnett

, filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss this ap peal. In the m otion,

Barnett states that the parties settled this case

. Accordin gly, the motion to dismiss is granted,

and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1 (a).

Opinion deliver ed June 30, 2021.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF T E XAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 30 , 2021

N O. 12

- 21

- 00019

- CV

JOHN BARNETT

, Appellant

V.

THOMAS C. BRIGHT, JAMES MCANDREW, CHARLES DICKSON, J. LEONARD

DECARLO, ROBERT CLAY WILLIAMS AND UROLOGY TYLER, P.A.

, Appellee s

Appeal from the County Court at Law

of Smith Co unty, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 71987 )

THI S CAUSE came on to be heard on the unopposed motion of the Appellant

to dismiss the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be grante d and the appeal

be dismissed, an d that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curia m opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Wilson CheungWilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer February 12, 2010
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Accountants**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(No. 333-91570, No. 333-61874) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-100843, No. 333-83506, No. 333-60156, No. 333-49032) of Chordiant Software, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, except for Note 22, which is as of March27, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 27, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAUL J. CAMBRIA, JR. (NY 15873, admitted pro hac vice) 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

pcambria@lglaw.com 

ERIN. E. MCCAMPBELL (NY 4480166, admitted pro hac vice) 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

emccampbell@lglaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

Defendants. 

 CASE NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND 

TIME FOR FILING MICHAEL 

LACEY’S REPLY TO RULE 29 

 

 Paul J. Cambria and Erin McCampbell Paris hereby moves for an extension of its 

deadline to reply in support to Michael Lacey’s Rule 29 motion. The current deadline is 

January 16, 2024. The Defense requests that the Court extend the reply deadline by 2 

days, to January 18, 2024. Mr. Cambria and Mrs. Paris makes this request because Mrs. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2028-1 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paris is currently home ill and unable to finish preparing the Reply. Further Mr. Cambria out of 

town on business. Mrs. Paris has consulted with the assigned AUSAs, who do not oppose 

the requested extension of the response time. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 16th day of January, 2024. 

 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

 By: /s/ Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

 PAUL J. CAMBRIA, JR. 

 Attorney for Defendant Michael Lacey 

On January, 2024, a PDF version 

of this document was filed with the 

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF 

System for filing and for Transmittal 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2028-1 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the 

Following CM/ECF registrants: 

Kevin Rapp, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov 

Reginald Jones, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov 

Peter Kozinets, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov 

John Kucera, john.kucera@usdoj.gov 

Margaret Perlmeter, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

Patrick Reid, Patrick.Reid@usdoj.gov 

Andrew Stone, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov 

Amanda Wick, Amanda.Wick@usdoj.gov 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2028-1 Filed 01/16/24 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

File No. 08-20524

-vsHon. Robert H. Cleland 

PHILLIP GRAY, Mag. Judge R. Steven Whalen

Defendant.

STIPULATED ORDER TO EXTEND MOTION CUT-OFF

DATE, PLEA CUT-OFF DATE, AND TRIAL DATE

UPON STIPULATION of the parties,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the scheduling dates shall be extended as follows:

Motion Cut-off January 9, 2009

Final Pretrial/plea Cut-off February 3, 2009 @ 2:00 p.m.

Trial Date February 9, 2009 @ 9:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time from November 21, 2008 to February

9, 2009 is excludable delay under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 USC §3161(h)(8)(A), as a

period of delay resulting from a continuance requested by counsel for Defendant

Gray and agreed to by counsel for the government, and said continuance serves the

interest of justice and outweighs the best interest of the public and the defendant in

a speedy trial. 

 S/Robert H. Cleland 

 HONORABLE ROBERT H. CLELAND

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

s/XÜ|Ç f{tã w/consent 11/04/08 s/Craig A. Daly 

ERIN SHAW CRAIG A. DALY, P.C.(P27539)

Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant

211 W. Fort St., Suite 2001 28 W. Adams, Suite 900 

Detroit, Michigan 48226 Detroit, Michigan 48226 

Phone: (313) 226-9182 Phone: (313) 963-1455

Fax: (313) 226-2372 Fax: (313) 961-4315

erin.shaw@usdoj.gov 4bestdefense@sbcglobal.net
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Melvin POHLE, Appellant. Melvin POHLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 64403.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

May 16, 1995.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., David G. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Melvin Pohle, appeals from a jury-trial conviction in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis of the class B felony of first degree burglary, RSMo § 569.160 (1994), for which he was sentenced as a persistent and class X offender to thirty years’ imprisonment. Appellant also appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the order of the circuit court is not clearly erroneous. As we further find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           5,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,967
<PP&E>                                          25,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,000
<BONDS>                                         27,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,409
<SALES>                                        101,539
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,843
<CGS>                                           65,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,997
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,586
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
        


</TABLE>