alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |                                                       |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      May 14, 2010  |   | /s/ JASON      M. MORTON                              |   |
|                          |   | Jason      M. Morton                                       |   |
|                          |   | Chief      Financial Officer,                              |   |
|                          |   | III      to I International MaritimeSolutions Cayman, Inc. |   |

----
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

OAO 435

AZ Form (Rev. 1/2015)

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

9 APPEAL 9 CRIMINAL

9 NON-APPEAL 9 CIVIL

9 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

9 

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER (Specify)

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested.)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

9TESTIMONY (Specify)

9PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

9OTHER (Specify)

9VOIR DIRE

9OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

9OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

9CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

9OPINION OF COURT

9JURY INSTRUCTIONS

9SENTENCING

9BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(Check all that apply.)

ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS 9 9 PAPER COPY

PDF (e-mail)

ASCII (e-mail)

14 DAYS 9 9

7 DAYS 9 9

DAILY 9 9

HOURLY 9 9

REALTIME 9 9

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)

By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING MORE THAN ONE FORMAT, 

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE.

19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT

TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 72 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Eastern District of Michigan

Plaintiff, Case No. 4:08-MJ-30413

vs. Western District of Michgian

Case No. 1:07-CR-0160

LARRY ARDEL UMPHRYES, Michael Hluchaniuk

United States Magistrate Judge

Defendant.

 /

ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

The defendant appeared before the Court on September 18, 2008, based

upon a petition for removal of defendant to another district, pursuant to Rule 5,

Fed.R.Cr.P. In the petition, the government states that defendant was arrested in

this district on September 17, 2008, based upon an Indictment from the Western

District of Michigan for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Bond had been

set in the Western District and defendant pleaded guilty to the charge in the

indictment in September of 2007. When defendant failed to appear for sentencing

in January of 2008 a warrant was issued for defendant’s arrest.

At the time of the initial appearance hearing following his arrest in this

district, the defendant waived his right to an identity hearing, and the Court
proceeded with the issue of bond in this matter. Based upon the information

presented at the hearing, it appears that the defendant violated the terms of his

bond that had been set in the Western District by committing an offense while he

was awaiting sentencing and under the supervision of the Pretrial Services Agency

in Western District of Michigan. It further appears that the defendant failed to

report his subsequent arrest and incarceration by state authorities to the Pretrial

Services Agency in that district. It also appears that he failed to appear for

sentencing as required.

Accordingly, the defendant shall be detained without bond pending his

appearance before the district court judge in the United States District Court,

Western District of Michigan.

SO ORDERED.

Date: September 19, 2008 s/ Michael Hluchaniuk

Michael Hluchaniuk

United States Magistrate Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 19, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing

paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following: Nancy A. Abraham, AUSA, and I

hereby certify that I have either hand delivered or mailed the paper to the following

non-ECF participants: David I. Medgell, 727 S. Grand Traverse, Flint, MI 48502,

Federal Defender Office 653 S. Saginaw St., Ste. 105, Flint, MI 48502, United

States Marshal, 600 Church St., Flint, MI 48502, Pretrial Services Officer, 600

Church St., Flint, MI 48502

s/ James P. Peltier

James P. Peltier

Courtroom Deputy Clerk

810-341-7850

pete peltier@mied.uscourts.gov
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

2 East Congress Street, Suite 1000

Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 622-6900

Michael L. Piccarreta

State Bar No. 003962

Email: mlp@pd-law.com

Attorney for Defendant Andrew Padilla

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

6. Andrew Padilla,

 (Counts 1-51)

 Defendant.

NO. CR-18-00422-06-PHX-SPL

DEFENDANT ANDREW PADILLA’S 

REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

(UNOPPOSED)

It is expected that excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D) will occur 

as a result of this motion or an order based thereon, as explained more fully below.

Defendant Andrew Padilla respectfully requests that this Court set a status conference 

at a date convenient to the Court on or after January 15, 2019, so that defendants can advise 

the Court as to the status of the case and discuss issues relative to case management. 

Defendants have no objection if the status conference is set in conjunction with oral argument 

on any pending motions. The parties have agreed to file a status conference report with the 

Court seven days prior to any scheduled status conference.

Counsel has discussed this matter with counsel for the co-defendants and Assistant 

United States Attorney Kevin Rapp who do not oppose the setting of a status conference at 

the Court’s scheduling convenience.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 425 Filed 12/21/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 21st day of December, 2018.

PICCARRETA DAVIS KEENAN FIDEL PC

By: /s/ Michael L. Piccarreta

Michael L. Piccarreta

Attorney for Andrew Padilla

On December 21, 2018, a PDF version

of this document was filed with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF

System for filing and for Transmittal

of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the

following CM/ECF registrants:

Reginald Jones, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

Peter Kozinets, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

John Kucera, john.kucera@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov

Kevin Rapp, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov

Patrick Reid, Patrick.Reid@usdoj.gov>

Andrew Stone, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov

Amanda Wick, Amanda.Wick@usdoj.gov

Paul Cambria, pcambria@lglaw.com

Tom Bienert, tbienert@bmkattorneys.com

Bruce Feder, bf@federlawpa.com

Michael Kimerer, mdk@kimerer.com

Stephen Weiss, sweiss@karpweiss.com

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 425 Filed 12/21/18 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-7 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-7 Filed 02/11/19 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-7 Filed 02/11/19 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-7 Filed 02/11/19 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-7 Filed 02/11/19 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 456-7 Filed 02/11/19 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 4 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 227-4 Filed 07/20/18 Page 7 of 7
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX

U.S. District Judge: Diane J. Humetewa Date: October 13, 2023

USA v. Michael Lacey, et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Kevin Rapp, Austin Berry, Margaret Perlmeter, Andrew Stone, Peter 

Kozinets

Attorneysfor Defendants: Paul J. Cambria Jr., Retained for Defendant Lacey, present; Bruce S. Feder, 

Retained (Knapp) and Eric W. Kessler, CJA for Defendant Spear, present; Gopi K. Panchapakesan, 

Retained for Defendant Brunst, present; David S. Eisenberg, CJA for Defendant Padilla, present; Joy M. 

Bertrand, CJA for Defendant Vaught, present.

Defendants: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

JURY TRIAL (Day 18):

9:00 a.m. Court reconvenes. Discussion held with counsel. 9:05 a.m. Jury present. Eric Murray

examined further. Cross-Examination by Mr. Cambria. 9:13 a.m. No additional cross-examination. 

Redirect. 9:19 a.m. Witness excused. Jessika Svengard sworn and examined. Exhibit 211c is admitted. 

9:46 a.m. Cross-Examination by Ms. Bertrand. 9:49 a.m. No additional cross-examination and no 

redirect. Witness excused. Brian Griffin sworn and examined. 10:34 a.m. Cross-Examination by Mr. 

Kessler. 

11:01 a.m. Court reconvenes. 11:05 a.m. Jury present. Witness examined further. 11:19 a.m. CrossExamination by Mr. Cambria. 11:21 a.m. No additional cross examination. Redirect. 11:24 a.m. 

Witness excused. Quoc Thai sworn and examined. Exhibits 1480, 1481, 1479, 1545, and 1691 are 

admitted. 12:32 p.m. Court in recess until Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 9:00 a.m.

Court Reporter Cathy Taylor

Deputy Clerk Liliana Figueroa

Start: 8:52 AM

Stop: 12:32 PM

Total: 3hrs 13min

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1857 Filed 10/13/23 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.37


 


[VIRGIN MEDIA LOGO]


 


22nd December 2008


 


Malcolm Wall


[Intentionally omitted]


 


Dear Malcolm


 


Further to our recent discussions I can confirm that
you will be entitled to terminate your employment with the Company by giving at
least 21 days’ prior written notice, to take effect at any time in the period
commencing on 31 March 2009 and ending on 30 June 2009, instead of 12
months currently provided in your contract of employment.


 


 


Best regards


 


	
  /s/ Neil Berkett

  	
   

  
	
  Neil Berkett

  	
   

  
	
  CEO

  	
   

  
	
  For Telewest Communications Group Limited

  	
   

  



 


 


I have read the contents of this letter, and confirm
my acceptance of the same.


 


 


	
  Signed:

  	
  /s/ MALCOLM WALL

  	
   

  
	
  Malcolm Wall

  	
   

  



 


Date:  12 January 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightlake Therapeutics Inc. (the “Company") for the three month ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dr. Roger Crystal, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: 3/17/11                           By: /s/ Dr. Roger Crystal


Dr. Roger Crystal


Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 32631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16374]





                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 63 / Tuesday, June 25, 1996 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 32631]]


                 Presidential Determination No. 96-33 of June 21, 1996

                
Reconfirmation of Findings With Respect to the 
                Trade
                Agreement With the People's Republic of China

                Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

                Since February 1, 1992, the United States of America 
                and the People's Republic of China have had in effect a 
                bilateral Agreement on Trade Relations, in relation to 
                which, pursuant to my authority under subsection 
                405(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
                2435(b)(1)), I reconfirm that a satisfactory balance of 
                concessions in trade and services has been maintained 
                during the life of the Agreement and that actual or 
                foreseeable reductions in U.S. tariffs and nontariff 
                barriers to trade resulting from multilateral 
                negotiations are, and continuously have been, 
                satisfactorily reciprocated by the People's Republic of 
                China.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 21, 1996.

[FR Doc. 96-16374
Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3190-01-P
Case 2:18-cv-00621-DGC Document 110 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Robert C. Bowen, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Scientific Learning Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2004 that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:May 25, 2005   /s/ Robert C. Bowen       Robert C. Bowen
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael E. STEVENSON, Appellant.

No. WD 40110.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nov. 29, 1988.

Carl W. Bussey, Kansas City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.

Before FENNER, P.J., and MANFORD and GAITAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a jury conviction for the unlawful use of a weapon, in violation of § 571.030.1(1), RSMo 1986.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Rule 30.-25(b).
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 31, 2019

No. 04-19-00312-CV

Marcel MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

Jesse TORRES, Gold Standard Plumbing, LLC and Edy Jonathan Pech-Guamuch,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-17644

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee/ Cross-Appellant’s Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 

File Brief is GRANTED. Time is extended to January 3, 2020.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31823-31824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15792]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 31824]]

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Parts 100, 110 and 114

[Notice 1996-12]


Candidate Debates and News Stories

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Final rule: Announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 24, 1996, the Commission published the text of 
revised regulations governing candidate debates and news stories 
produced by cable television organizations. 61 FR 18049. These 
regulations implement portions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971, as amended. The Commission announces that these rules are 
effective as of June 21, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 21, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Susan E. Propper, Assistant 
General Counsel, or Ms. Rosemary C. Smith, Senior Attorney, 999 E 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 219-3690 or toll free (800) 
424-9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today, the Commission is announcing the 
effective date of new regulations governing candidate debates and news 
stories produced by cable television organizations. The new rules are 
being incorporated into parts 100, 110 and 114 of the existing 
regulations.
    Section 438(d) of Title 2, United States Code, requires that any 
rule or regulation prescribed by the Commission to implement Title 2 of 
the United States Code be transmitted to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives and the President of the Senate thirty legislative days 
prior to final promulgation. The revisions to 11 CFR 100.7(b)(2), 
100.8(b)(2), 110.13 and 114.4(f) were transmitted to Congress on April 
18, 1996. Thirty legislative days expired in the Senate on June 7, 1996 
and in the House of Representatives on June 10, 1996.

Announcement of Effective Date

    11 CFR 100.7(b)(2), 100.8(b)(2), 110.13 and 114.4(f), as published 
at 61 FR 18049 on April 24, 1996 are effective as of June 21, 1996.

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
Lee Ann Elliott,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-15792 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 688 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 688

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 22, 2009.
Whereas in 1971, in Public Law 92-195 (commonly known as the ``Wild Free-Roaming 
        Horses and Burros Act'') (16 U.S.C. 1331 et seq.), Congress declared 
        that wild free-roaming horses and burros are living symbols of the 
        historic and pioneer spirit of the West;
Whereas, under that Act, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
        Agriculture have responsibility for the humane capture, removal, and 
        adoption of wild horses and burros;
Whereas the Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service are the Federal 
        agencies responsible for carrying out the provisions of the Act;
Whereas a number of private organizations will assist with the adoption of 
        excess wild horses and burros, in conjunction with the first National 
        Wild Horse and Burro Adoption Day; and
Whereas there are approximately 31,000 wild horses in short-term and long-term 
        holding facilities, with 18,000 young horses awaiting adoption: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of a National Wild Horse and Burro Adoption 
        Day to be held annually in coordination with the Secretary of Interior 
        and the Secretary of Agriculture;
            (2) recognizes that creating a successful adoption model for wild 
        horses and burros is consistent with Public Law 92-195 (commonly known 
        as the ``Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act'') (16 U.S.C. 1331 et 
        seq.) and beneficial to the long-term interests of the people of the 
        United States in protecting wild horses and burros; and
            (3) encourages citizens of the United States to adopt a wild horse 
        or burro so as to own a living symbol of the historic and pioneer spirit 
        of the West.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```