alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Aracelia Aguirre, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00382-01-PHX-SPL (JZB) 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On August 29, 2018, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition to revoke 

conditions of release. The Court considered the information provided to the Court, and 

the arguments of counsel, in determining whether the Defendant should be released on 

conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that Defendant has violated the 

conditions of release and that there is no condition or combination of conditions available 

to the Court that will reasonably assure the appearance of Defendant as required and the 

safety of the community. 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 30th day of August, 2018. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 284 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that all Americans 

should participate in a moment of silence to reflect upon the service 

and sacrifice of members of the United States Armed Forces both at 

home and abroad. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 24, 2009 

Mr. PETERS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

all Americans should participate in a moment of silence 

to reflect upon the service and sacrifice of members 

of the United States Armed Forces both at home and 

abroad. 

Whereas it was through the brave and noble efforts of the 

Nation’s forefathers that the United States first gained 

freedom and became a sovereign nation; 

Whereas there are more than 1,500,000 active and reserve 

component members of the Armed Forces serving the 

Nation in support and defense of the values and freedom 

that all Americans cherish; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 284 IH 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces deserve the utmost respect and admiration of their fellow Americans 

for putting their lives in danger for the sake of the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are defending freedom and democracy around the globe and are playing a 

vital role in protecting the safety and security of all 

Americans; 

Whereas the Nation officially celebrates and honors the accomplishments and sacrifices of veterans, patriots, and 

leaders who fought for freedom, but does not yet officially 

pay tribute to those who currently serve in the Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas all Americans should participate in a moment of silence to support our troops; and 

Whereas March 26, 2009, is designated as ‘‘National Support 

Our Troops Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that all Americans should participate in a mo3 ment of silence to reflect upon the service and sacrifice 

4 of members of the United States Armed Forces both at 

5 home and abroad. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Vincent TALLIE, Appellant. Vincent TALLIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 67126.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 23, 1996.

Emmett D. Queener, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Christine M. Blegan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD, and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Vincent Tallie, appeals the judgment of conviction for stealing over $150.00 in violation of RSMo § 570.030 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County after a jury trial. Appellant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. We further find the *512judgment denying the Rule 29.15 motion is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 2, 2011 

# Order

December 2, 2011

140147(60)(67)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 140147 v COA: 274148 St. Clair CC: 03-000881-FH JAMES EUGENE GRISSOM, Defendant-Appellant.

_____________ _______________ _____________

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by defendant-appellant for extension of the time for filing his brief are considered and it appearing the brief was filed November 7, 2011, the time for filing is extended to that date.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
No. 98-8167 Non-Argument Calendar. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. Ramiro SANCHEZ-VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant. Aug. 5, 1998. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Northern Dist rict of Georgia. (No. 2:97-cr-028- WCO), William C. O’Kelley, Judge. Before GODBOLD, HILL and FAY, Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Ramiro Sanchez-Valencia appeals his 66-month sentence for illegally re-entering the United States after being deported. On appeal, Sanchez-Valencia argues that the district court erroneously believed that it did not have the authority to downwardly depart on th e basis of cultural assimilation, and that such a departure was warranted. This Court has held that a district court's discretionary refusal to depart downward is not appealable, unless the refusal was based on an erroneous belief that the court did not have the statutory authority to depart from the guideline range. United States v. Fossett, 881 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.1989). We have reviewed the transcripts, the presentence investigation report, the judgment and commitment order, and all other relevant portions of the record. Those, together with the briefs of the parties, demonstrate that the sentencing judge was aware of his authority to depart in light ofUnited States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726 (9th Cir.1998). While it is possible to determine from this r ecord that the district court was aware of its authority, it would facilitate review if sentencing judges would state on the record that they believe they have or do not have the authority to depart.
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 942 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 942

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 14, 2009.
Whereas the Real Salt Lake soccer club won the 2009 Major League Soccer Cup, 
        defeating the Los Angeles Galaxy at Qwest Field in Seattle, Washington 
        on November 22, 2009;
Whereas Real Salt Lake played through 2 sudden-death overtimes and a penalty-
        kick shootout to defeat the Galaxy;
Whereas forward Robbie Findlay scored a goal in the second half to tie the game 
        and force an overtime period;
Whereas defender Robbie Russell scored the decisive fifth goal in the seventh 
        round of the shootout to win the game;
Whereas goalkeeper Nick Rimando blocked 4 shots, including 2 in the shootout, 
        and was named the Most Valuable Player of the game;
Whereas head coach Jason Kreis is the youngest coach to win a Major League 
        Soccer Cup, and coached Real Salt Lake to its second post-season 
        appearance since joining the team in 2007; and
Whereas Real Salt Lake defeated the top 2 seeds in the Eastern Conference, the 
        first-seeded Columbus Crew and the second-seeded Chicago Fire, to reach 
        the championship game: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Real Salt Lake soccer club for winning the 2009 
        Major League Soccer Cup; and
            (2) congratulates Real Salt Lake for winning the first Major League 
        Soccer Cup in the franchise's history.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 3040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-1633]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Agency Forms Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for 
Clearance

    The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 
Secretary periodically publishes a list of information collections it 
has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for 
clearance in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35) and 5 CFR 1320.5. The following are those 
information collections recently submitted to OMB.
    1. Application for Correction of Public Health Service Commissioned 
Corps Records--0937-0095--Reinstatement No Change--An application is 
submitted by present and former PHS Commissioned Corps officers to 
request correction of an error or alleged injustice in their personnel 
records.
    The information submitted is used by the Board for Correction to 
determine if an error or injustice has occurred and to rectify such 
error or injustice.
    Respondents: Individuals; Annual Number of Respondents: 8;
    Average Burden per Response: four hours; Frequency of response: 
single-time; Total Burden: 32 hours.
    2. State Medicaid Fraud Control Units Annual Report and 
Certification Application (42 CFR 1007.15 and 1007.17)--0990-0162--
Reinstatement No Change--The program data required of initial 
applicants to become certified, and the annual reports required for 
recertification are used by the Office of Inspector General to ensure 
that Federal matching funds are only expended for allowable costs. In 
addition, the reports are analyzed to monitor program activities and 
determine whether technical assistance is required.
    Respondents: States; Burden Information for New Applicants--Number 
of Respondents: 2; Frequency of Response: one-time; Burden per 
Response: 112 hours; Burden for New Applicants: 224 hours--Burden 
Information for Recertification--Number of Respondents: 45; Frequency 
of Response: annually; Burden per Response: 56 hours; Burden for 
Recertification: 2520 hours--Total Burden: 2744 hours.
    OMB Desk Officer: Allison Eydt.
    Copies of the information collection packages listed above can be 
obtained by calling the OS Reports Clearance Officer on (202) 619-1053. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the OMB desk officer designated 
above at the following address: Human Resources and Housing Branch, 
Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: January 18, 1996.
Dennis P. Williams,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Budget.
[FR Doc. 96-1633 Filed 1-29-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
Order entered October 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00759-CR

DARREIAN OWENS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-00300-H

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Crystal Jones’s October 16, 2018 second request for 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the 

reporter’s record filed on or before November 26, 2018. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6716

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRENCE LEE HOGGARD, a/k/a Chuck, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-73, CA-97-427-2) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 2, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terrence Lee Hoggard, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ann Snow, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Terrence Lee Hoggard appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion fora certificate of appealability, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hoggard , Nos. CR-92-73; CA-97-427-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

131898 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 131898 COA: 270886 Allegan CC: 02-012311-FH JESSE GENE BURNS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether th e intermediate sanction described in MCL 769.31(b) and MCL 769.34(4), which require the trial court to impose a sentence that does not include prison, constitutes a statutory maximum sentence under Blakely v Washington , 524 US 296 (2004), for which the depa rture reasons must be decided by a jury or admitted by the defend ant, where the defend ant is being sentenced for a violation of probation.

The Criminal Defense Attorneys of Mi chigan and the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan are inv ited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups
interested in the determinati on of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

p1114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 17, 2006

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6529
HEBERT CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusD. TAYLOR, Warden, Ridgeland Correctional Institution; A. PICKNEY, Unit Manager, RidgelandCorrectional Institution; MRS. BEASLEY, Medical Ridgeland Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-246-4-18BE) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Gaffney, LEWIS, REEVES & STONE, Columbia, South Carolina; James Miller Davis, Jr., ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., C olumbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. Taylor , No. CA96-246-4-18BE (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United States of America, No. CR-18-00422-PHX-DJH 

10 Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER RE: EXHIBITS 

11 

v. 

12 Michael Lacey, et al., 

13 Defendants. 

14 

15 

16 

17 18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the exhibits marked and/or admitted in the 

above-entitled case as the time of the Jury Trial are returned to respective counsel on 

November 16, 2023. Counsel are directed to retain custody of the exhibits until the case 

is completely terminated, including all appeals. 

Dated this 16th day of November, 2023. 

Debra D. Lucas, 

District Court Executive/Clerk of Court 

(

--

r . I X----' by: ', ... _ -..._ __ -~ 

L. Figueroa 

Courtroom Deputy for Judge Diane J. Humetewa
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002








The
      undersigned, James B. Wiegand, Chief Executive Officer of Rosewind Corporation
      (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the
      purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.











/s/James
        B.
        Wiegand___________________________
 James
      B.
      Wiegand


Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


January
      11, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NORTHWEST CHARIOTS INCORPORATED (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas Dewar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: February 25, 2008
|-----------------------



|By:/s/ Douglas Dewar
|--------------------



| | Douglas DewarChief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------

---
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 115 (Thursday, June 13, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15075]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor 
Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware and 
Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice 
of this meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463).
    Meeting Date and Time: Wednesday, June 19, 1996; 1:30 p.m. until 
4:30 p.m.
    Address: Commission Offices, 10 E. Church Street, Bethlehem, PA 
18018.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh Canal National 
Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was 
established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its 
political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated 
strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural 
resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and 
to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal 
National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 
100-692, November 18, 1988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deputy Director, Delaware and Lehigh 
Navigational Canal, National Heritage Corridor Commission, 10 E. Church 
Street, Room P-208, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 861-9345.

    Dated: May 22, 1996.
David B. Witwer,
Deputy Director, Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal, NHC Commission.
[FR Doc. 96-15075 Filed 6-12-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16178]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Committee Name: National Institute of General Medical Sciences 
Special Emphasis Panel--Program Project Review.
    Date: July 18, 1996.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.--adjournment.
    Place: Club House Inn & Conference Center, 930 Broadway, 
Nashville, TN 37203.
    Contact Person: Irene B. Glowinski, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIGMS, 45 Center Drive, Room 1AS-19K, Bethesda, MD 
20892-6200.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate a program project application 
relating to the determinants of individual responsiveness to drugs.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS]).

    Dated: June 18, 1996.
Susan K. Feldman,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 96-16178 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M