31936 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 121 / Friday, June 21, 1996 / Notices

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS—Continued

[Week of March 4 through March 8, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

3/6/96 ...................... Rice’s Grocery and Gulf Service, Swannanoa, North Caroling.RR300–274 Request for Modification/Rescission in

the Gulf Oil Refund Proceeding. If

granted: The February 7, 1996 Decision and Order Case No. RF300–

18327 issued to Rice’s Grocery and

Gulf Service would be modified regarding the firm’s application for refund submitted in the Gulf Oil refund

proceeding.

3/7/96 ...................... Buffalo Aeronautical Corp., Buffalo, New York ................... RR300–275 Request for Modification/Rescission in

the Gulf Oil Refund Proceeding. If

granted: The January 30, 1996 Dismissal Case No. RF300–16947

would be modified regarding the

firm’s application for refund submitted in the Gulf Oil refund proceeding.

3/8/96 ...................... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico VSO–0085 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR

Part 710. If granted: An individual

employed at Albuquerque Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

3/8/96 ...................... Albuquerque Operations Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico VSO–0086 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR

Part 710. If granted: An individual

employed at Albuquerque Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

3/8/96 ...................... Idaho Operations Office, Idaho Falls, Idaho ....................... VSO–0087 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR

Part 710. If granted: An individual

employed at Idaho Operations Office

would receive a hearing under 10

CFR Part 710.

3/8/96 ...................... William H. Payne, Albuquerque, New Mexico .................... VFA–0137 thru

VFA–0141

Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The January 24,

1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by Albuquerque

Operations Office would be rescinded, and William H. Payne

would receive access to certain

DOE information.

[FR Doc. 96–15869 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Notice of Cases Filed During the Week

of April 22 Through April 26, 1996

During the Week of April 22 through

April 26, 1996, the appeals and

applications for exception or other relief

listed in the Appendix to this Notice

were filed with the Office of Hearings

and Appeals of the Department of

Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, DC 20585–0107.

Dated: June 10, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARING AND APPEALS

[Week of April 22 through April 26, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

April 22, 1996 ......... Chey A. Temple, Moxie, Washington ...... VFA–0154 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

April 3, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial issued by Richland Operations Office would be rescinded,

and Chey A. Temple would receive access to certain DOE

information.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 121 / Friday, June 21, 1996 / Notices 31937

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARING AND APPEALS—Continued

[Week of April 22 through April 26, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Do .................... META, Inc., Arlington, Virginia ................ VWA–0006 Request for Hearing under DOE Contractor Employee Protection Program. If granted: A hearing under 10 CFR Part

708 would be held on the complaint of Eugene Greer that

reprisals were taken against him by management officials

of META, Inc. as a consequence of his having cooperated

with an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General.

Do .................... Leo Longtin’s Texaco Fairhaven, Vermont.RR321–196 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Texaco Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The February 4, 1992 Dismissal,

Case No. RF321–11058, issued to Leo Longtin’s Texaco

would be rescinded and the firm would receive a refund in

the Texaco refund proceeding.

Do .................... Rocky Flats Field Office Golden, Colorado.VSO–0093 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at the Rocky Flats Field Office would

receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

April 25, 1996 ......... Oakland Operations Office, Oakland,

California.

VSO–0094 Request for Hearing under 10 CFR Part 710. If granted: An

individual employed at Oakland Operations Office would receive a hearing under 10 CFR Part 710.

April 22, 1996 ......... S. T. Wooten Corp., Wilson, North Carolina.RR272–238 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund

Proceeding. If granted: The January 30, 1996 Decision and

Order, Case No. RF272–95180, issued to S. T. Wooten

Corp. would be modified regarding the firm’s application in

the crude oil refund proceeding.

REFUND APPLICATIONS RECEIVED

[Week of April 22 to April 26, 1996]

Date received Name of refund proceeding/name of refund applicant Case No.

April 22, 1996 thru April 26, 1996 Crude Oil Supplemental Refunds .......................................................... RK272–3493 thru RK272–3516.

[FR Doc. 96–15870 Filed 6–20–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

[FRL–5524–8]

Agency Information Collection

Activities Under OMB Review; National

Emission Standards for Asbestos OMB

No. 2060–0101 EPA No. 0111.08

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507(a)(1)(D)), this notice announces

that the Information Collection Request

(ICR) for Petroleum Refineries described

below has been forwarded to the Office

of Management and Budget (OMB) for

review and comment. The ICR describes

the nature of the information collection

and its expected burden and cost; where

appropriate, it includes the actual data

collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before July 22, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY

CALL: Sandy Farmer at EPA, (202) 260–

2740, and refer to EPA ICR No. 0111.08.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title: National Emission Standards for

Asbestos (OMB No. 2060–0101; EPA

ICR No. 0111.08). This is a request for

a revision of a currently approved

collection.

Abstract: Owners or operators of the

affected milling, manufacturing

fabricating, waste disposal, and waste

conversion facilities described must

make the following one-time-only

reports: Notification of the date of

construction or reconstruction;

notification of the anticipated and

actual dates of startup; notification of

any physical or operational change to an

existing facility which may increase the

regulated pollutant emission rate.

Owners or operators are also required to

maintain records of the occurrence and

duration of any startup, shutdown, or

malfunction in the operation of an

affected facility, or any period during

which the monitoring system is

inoperative.

An Agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a collection of information

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The OMB control

numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed

in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter

15. The Federal Register Notice

required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d),

soliciting comments on this collection

of information was published on 3/26/

96 (FR 61, No. 59, p 13186–87).

Burden Statement: The annual public

reporting and recordkeeping burden for

this collection of information is

estimated to average 0.25 hours per

response for milling, manufacturing,

and fabricating; 0.75 hours for

demolitions and renovations; and 1.5

hours for waste disposal. Burden means

the total time, effort, or financial

resources expended by persons to

generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or

provide information to or for a Federal

agency. This includes the time needed

to review instructions; develop, acquire,

install, and utilize technology and

systems for the purposes of collecting,

validating, and verifying information,

processing and maintaining

information, and disclosing and

providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements; train personnel to be able

to respond to a collection of

information; search data sources;

complete and review the collection of

information; and transmit or otherwise

disclose the information.