alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ANTHONY MARTIN

Acting United States Attorney

District of Arizona

KEVIN M. RAPP (Ariz. Bar No. 014249, kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov) MARGARET PERLMETER (Ariz. Bar No. 024805, margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov) PETER S. KOZINETS (Ariz. Bar No. 019856, peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov) 

ANDREW C. STONE (Ariz. Bar No. 026543, andrew.stone@usdoj.gov) Assistant U.S. Attorneys

40 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408

Telephone (602) 514-7500

DAN G. BOYLE (N.Y. Bar No. 5216825, daniel.boyle2@usdoj.gov) 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

312 N. Spring Street, Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90012

Telephone (213) 894-2426

NICHOLAS L. MCQUAID

Acting Assistant Attorney General 

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES (Miss. Bar No. 102806, reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov) Senior Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section 

950 Pennsylvania Ave N.W., Room 2116 Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone (202) 616-2807 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

5. Dan Hyer,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-005-PHX- SMB

MOTION TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING

(Sixth Request)

The United States of America hereby requests this Court to continue the sentencing 

currently set for April 5, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. for Defendant Dan Hyer, to a date occurring 

after the conclusion of the trial in U.S. v. Michael Lacey, et al. (CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB), 

which is currently set for August 23, 2021.

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1127 Filed 03/01/21 Page 1 of 2
- 2 –

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendant Hyer’s plea agreement contemplates that he will not be sentenced until 

the conclusion of his cooperation. 

Counsel for the Defendant has no objection to this motion.

Respectfully submitted this 1st day of March, 2021.

ANTHONY MARTIN

Acting United States Attorney District of Arizona

s/ Kevin Rapp KEVIN M. RAPP

MARGARET PERLMETER

PETER S. KOZINETS

ANDREW C. STONE

Assistant U.S. Attorneys

DAN G. BOYLE

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

NICHOLAS L. MCQUAID

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice

REGINALD E. JONES

Senior Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this same date, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

s/ Joy Faraj

US Attorney’s Office

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1127 Filed 03/01/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30869-30870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15412]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 30870]]


FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1115-DR]


West Virginia; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of West Virginia (FEMA-1115-DR), dated May 23, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of West Virginia, is hereby amended to include the following areas 
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 23, 1996:

    Harrison County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance and Hazard Mitigation Assistance).

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)

William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-15412 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### Buckeye Stages, Inc., et al. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

(No. 22788

Decided June 3, 1931.)

*150
      *Mr. Ralph Sanborn*and *Mr. Beecher W. Waiter-mire,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, and *Mr. T. J. Herbert,*for defendant in error.

*Mr. D. H. Armstrong,*for the Chillicothe-Hillsboro Stages, Inc.

By the Court

(Allen, J.).

The commission has found that the extension of route granted to the Chillicothe-Hillsboro Stages, Inc., is required by public convenience and necessity. This finding is amply sustained by the evidence. The question which confronts us, hence, is not that of the extension of a certificate where the public convenience and *151necessity does not require the extension. Since upon hearing it is shown that the instant order will safeguard essential transportation service between Hillsboro and Chillicothe, where the operation of the Chillicothe-Hillsboro Stages, Inc., is the only transportation service, and will also establish this new service between Yera Cruz and Milford via Newtonsville, required by the public convenience and necessity, the commission has not exceeded its powers. Buckeye Stages, Inc., has never operated over Route No. 131 between Yera Cruz and Milford. The possible curtailment of traffic to Buckeye Stages, Inc., on the through route, is obviated by proper restrictions.

Buckeye Stages, Inc., criticizes the final form of restriction established, amending the restriction originally set forth in the order. The final restriction reads as follows: “Conditioned that no persons be transported whose entire ride is between Hillsboro and Cincinnati, nor between Hillsboro and tbe intersection of U. S. Route No. 50 and Ohio State Route No. 131, nor between Milford and Cincinnati.”

Since State Route No. 131 intersects United States Route No. 50, both at Yera Cruz and at Milford, this criticism is justified.

We therefore affirm the order, but remand the case to the Public Utilities Commission for a more specific statement of the limitations to be imposed upon transportation over the route granted.

*Order affirmed.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day and Kinkade, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement (Form F-3, No. 333-136811) of EDAP TMS S.A. (the “Company”) of our report dated March 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006.

ERNST &YOUNG Audit

 

/s/ LAURENT CHAPOULAUD

__________________________

 

Represented by 

Laurent Chapoulaud

 

Lyon, France

March 30, 2007
---

Exhibit 31.2

|CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER         
|-----------------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A)            
|UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Herman Kotzé, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June, 30, 2011;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

|Date: April 3, 2012 | /s / Herman Kotzé                     
|------------------- | --------------------------------------
|                    | Herman Kotzé                          
|                    | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
|                    | Secretary                             

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1593. EDWARDS v. PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al.

This appeal was docketed on June 8, 2021, and the brief of appellant was due

20 days later, on June 28, 2021. The due date has passed, and appellant Muarlean

Cain Edwards has not filed a brief. Accordingly, Edwards’s appeal is hereby

DISMISSED for failure to file a brief. See Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

July 12, 2021

07/12/2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

KESSLER LAW GROUP

Eric W. Kessler, SBN 009158

9237 E. Via de Ventura, Ste. 230

Scottsdale, AZ 85257

(480) 644-0093 phone

(480) 644-0095 fax

Eric.KesslerLaw@gmail.com

FEDER LAW OFFICE PA

Bruce S. Feder, 004832

2930 E. Camelback Rod., Ste. 160

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

(602) 257-0135 phone

bf@federlawpa.com

Knapp Counsel

Attorneys for Defendant Scott Spear

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, ) No. 2:18-cr-00422-DJH

)

 Plaintiff, ) NOTICE OF CHANGE

v. ) OF ADDRESS OF LAW

) FIRM

Michael Lacey, et al., )

) (The Hon. Diane J. Humetewa)

Defendant. )

Undersigned defense counsel gives notice of his firm’s new address:

KESSLER LAW GROUP

9237 E. Via de Ventura, Ste. 230

Scottsdale, AZ 85257

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1875 Filed 10/19/23 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this October 19, 2023

 s/ Eric W. Kessler 

Eric W. Kessler, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Spear

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 19, 2023, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants who have entered their appearance 

as counsel of record.

 s/ Eric W. Kessler 

Eric W. Kessler, Esq.

Attorney for Defendant Spear

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1875 Filed 10/19/23 Page 2 of 2
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00147

- CR

T HEIN Q UANG

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 211th District

Court

of Denton County ( F18

- 794

- 431 )

August 5, 2021

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

( nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3077

_____________________________

THOMAS RAY PRESSWOOD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

January 11, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Vasogen Inc. (the "Company") on Form
40-F for the fiscal year ending November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Waddick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date: April 17, 2003

                                                      /s/ Christopher Waddick
                                                      ------------------------
                                                      Christopher Waddick
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SmartHeat Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhijuan Guo, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Zhijuan
              GuoZhijuan
                Guo
                Chief
                  Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

ELIZABETH A. STRANGE 

First Assistant United States Attorney 

ANNA WRIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

Assistant U.S. Attorney 

State Bar No.: 029708 

405 West Congress, Suite 4800 

Tucson, Arizona 85701-5040 

Telephone: (520) 620-7300 

E-mail: anna.wright@usdoj.gov 

E-mail: nathaniel.walters@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Scott Daniel Warren, 

 Defendant. 

18-CR-223-TUC-RCC (BPV) 

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO RECONSIDER 

MAGISTRATE’S DENIAL OF MOTION 

TO COMPEL AND TO WITHDRAW 

REFERRAL DUE TO IMPROPER EX 

PARTE COMMUNICATIONS 

The United States of America, by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby 

seeks leave to respond to the defendant’s Motion to Reconsider Magistrate’s Denial of 

Motion to Compel and to Withdraw Referral Due to Improper Ex Parte Communications. 

Doc. 145. 

Under the Local Rules of Procedure, “no response to a motion for reconsideration 

and no reply to the response may be filed unless ordered by the Court, but no motion for 

reconsideration may be granted unless the Court provides an opportunity for response.” 

LRCiv 7.2(g)(2) (incorporated by reference by LRCrim 12.1(a). The defendant’s filing, 

while styled as a motion to reconsider, is more akin to an appeal or new motion since it 

raises issues not addressed and asks for relief not requested in the underlying briefings. See

Doc. 138, 142. As such, the government seeks to respond in order to address the issues 

raised and the relief requested. Allowing the government to respond to the defendant’s 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 152 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

filing will promote the fair and efficient administration of justice by more fully developing 

the arguments, issues and record. 

A hearing as to the defendant’s filing is set for January 14, 2019. The government’s 

proposed response will be lodged with this motion. As such, excludable delay under 18 

U.S.C. § 3161 will not occur as a result of this motion or of an order based thereon. 

 Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of January, 2019. 

 ELIZABETH A. STRANGE

First Assistant United States Attorney 

 District of Arizona 

 /s/ Anna R. Wright & Nathaniel J. Walters

 ANNA WRIGHT &

 NATHANIEL J. WALTERS 

 Assistant U.S. Attorneys 

Copy of the foregoing served electronically or by 

other means this 2nd day of January, 2019, to: 

All ECF participants 

Case 4:18-cr-00223-RCC-BPV Document 152 Filed 01/02/19 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 8

LIST OF EDAP TMS
S.A. SUBSIDIARIES(as of March 31, 2005)

|Name of Subsidiary           | Juridiction of Incorporation |              
|---------------------------- | ---------------------------- | -------------
|                            
|Techomed Medical Systems S.A |                              | France       
|EDAP S.A                     |                              | France       
|EDAP Technomed S.r.l         |                              | Italy        
|EDAP Technomed, Inc.         |                              | United States
|EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd.      |                              | Japan        
|EDAP Technomed Sdn Bhd       |                              | Malaysia
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants. 

NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

 

Upon Motion of the Defendant, with good cause appearing and with no objection 

from the Government, 

IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s request that the Court recess trial from 

September 6, 2023 through September 8, 2023. 

SO ORDERED this _______ day of ___________, 2023. 

 ___________________________ 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1629-1 Filed 07/06/23 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX 

U.S. District Judge: Steven P. Logan Date: October 5, 2018 

USA v. Lacey et al Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL

Assistant U.S. Attorneys: Andrew Stone, Peter Kozinets, Margaret Perlmeter, Kevin Rapp 

(telephonically), John Kucera (telephonically) and Reginald Jones (telephonically). 

Defendant-1: Michael Lacey 

Attorneys for Defendant: James Grant, Robert Corn-Revere and Paul Cambria, retained 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-2: James Larkin 

Attorneys for Defendant: James Grant, Robert Corn-Revere, Thomas Bienert, Jr., Whitney 

Bernstein and Seetha Ramachandran, retained

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-3: Scott Spear 

Attorney for Defendant: Bruce Feder 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-4: John Brunst 

Attorneys for Defendant: Michael Kimerer and Ariel Neuman, retained 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Defendant-6: Andrew Padilla 

Attorney for Defendant: Michael Piccarreta, retained 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 337 Filed 10/05/18 Page 1 of 2
USA v. Lacey et al Date: October 5, 2018 

Case Number: CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL Page 2 of 2

Page 2 of 2 

Defendant-7: Joye Vaught 

Attorney for Defendant: Stephen Weiss, retained 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

Attorneys for Henze Cook Murphy PLLC: Lee Stein and Anne Chapman, retained

HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS: 

The following motions are argued to the Court: Government's Motion to Disqualify Counsel (Doc. 

118), Government’s Motion to Resolve Attorney-Client Privilege Issues (Doc. 195), Defendant 

Lacey’s Motion for Disclosure of Documents Related to Carl Ferrer’s Waiver of Privilege as Material 

to Disqualification (Doc. 202), Defendant Larkin’s Cross-Motion to Obtain Discovery and Address 

Privilege Issues (Doc. 235), Defendant Padilla’s Motion for Itemization of Brady/Giglio Material (Doc. 

273) Government’s Application for Order Regarding Criminal Forfeiture of Property in Government 

Custody (Doc. 282). The motions are taken under advisement.

Court Reporter Elva Cruz-Lauer and Linda Schroeder

Deputy Clerk Lisa Richter 

 Start: 9:12 AM 

Stop: 12:38 PM 

 Total court time: 3 hours, 6 minutes 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 337 Filed 10/05/18 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit E 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-5 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 2
Date Amount Page Bates

4/12/2013 575,827.00 1 DOJ-BP-0005034596

5/17/2013 228,419.48 2 DOJ-BP-0005034597

6/17/2013 349,134.80 3 DOJ-BP-0005034598

8/30/2013 125,375.00 4 DOJ-BP-0005034599

9/16/2013 193,915.49 5 DOJ-BP-0005034600

12/27/2013 26,523.00 6 DOJ-BP-0005034601

12/27/2013 260,604.54 7 DOJ-BP-0005034602

1/10/2014 139,247.00 8 DOJ-BP-0005034603

1/17/2014 81,141.94 10 DOJ-BP-0005034605

2/21/2014 21,692.88 11 DOJ-BP-0005034606

3/28/2014 260,604.41 12 DOJ-BP-0005034607

6/11/2014 410,285.00 13 DOJ-BP-0005034608

6/26/2014 217,170.25 14 DOJ-BP-0005034609

9/15/2014 126,904.00 15 DOJ-BP-0005034610

9/18/2014 434,341.04 16 DOJ-BP-0005034611

12/18/2014 69,341.34 17 DOJ-BP-0005034612

3/20/2015 828,973.21 18 DOJ-BP-0005034613

4/14/2015 471,521.15 19 DOJ-BP-0005034614

6/8/2015 532,180.00 20 DOJ-BP-0005034615

7/2/2015 347,964.00 21 DOJ-BP-0005034616

8/4/2015 122,811.00 22 DOJ-BP-0005034617

9/3/2015 130,998.00 23 DOJ-BP-0005034618

10/2/2015 130,998.00 24 DOJ-BP-0005034619

11/2/2015 184,216.00 25 DOJ-BP-0005034620

Total 6,270,188.53

Payments from Camarillo Holdings (BMO Harris x7172) 

4/12/2013 to 1/2/2015

to Spear (National Bank of Arizona x0178)

USAO-BP-0032697

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1223-5 Filed 08/19/21 Page 2 of 2