Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 115 / Thursday, June 13, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 29937

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for 14 CFR

part 71 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120;

E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963

Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR

11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6005: Class E Airspace areas

extending upward from 700 feet or more

above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASW NM E5 Las Vegas, NM [Revised]

Las Vegas Municipal Airport, NM

(Lat. 35°39′15′′N., long. 105°08′33′′W.)

Las Vegas VORTAC

(Lat. 35°39′27′′N., long. 105°08′08′′W.)

That airspace extending upward from 700

feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile

radius of Las Vegas Municipal Airport and

within 2.6 miles each side of the 025° radial

of the Las Vegas VORTAC extending from the

6.7-mile radius to 8.4 miles northeast of the

airport and within 2.4 miles each side of the

220° radial of the Las Vegas VORTAC

extending from the 6.7-mile radius to 7.5

miles southwest of the airport and within 1.6

miles each side of the 215° bearing from the

airport extending from the 6.7-mile radius to

8.2 miles southwest of the airport.

* * * * *

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on May 15, 1996.

Albert L. Viselli,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Southwest Region.

[FR Doc. 96–13942 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–ASO–20]

Establishment of Federal Colored

Airway B–9; FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This rule establishes a

Colored Federal Airway, Blue–9 (B–9),

from the DEEDS Intersection to the

Marathon Nondirectional Beacon (NDB),

FL. The establishment of B–9 will

enhance the management of air traffic

and accommodate the users of that

airspace.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 15, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia P. Crawford, Airspace and Rules

Division, ATA–400, Office of Air Traffic

Airspace Management, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone: (202) 267–8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On February 6, 1996, the FAA

proposed to amend Title 14 of the Code

of Regulations part 71 (14 CFR part 71)

to establish a Colored Federal Airway,

B–9, in Florida (61 FR 04380). Interested

parties were invited by the FAA to

participate in this rulemaking effort by

submitting written comments on the

proposal. Except for editorial changes,

this amendment is the same as proposed

in the notice. Colored Federal airways

are published in paragraph 6009(d) of

FAA Order 7400.9C dated August 17,

1995, and 95–ASO–20 2 effective

September 16, 1995, which is

incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Colored Federal airway listed

in this document will be published

subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71

establishes a new Colored Federal

Airway, B–9, from the DEEDS

Intersection to the Marathon NDB, FL.

This action will enhance the

management of air traffic and

accommodate the users of that airspace.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71, as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 6009(b)—Blue Federal Airways

* * * * *

B–9 [New]

From INT Pahokee, FL, 211° and Fort Myers,

FL, 138° radials; Marathon, FL.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 4, 1996.

Harold W. Becker,

Acting Program Director for Air Traffic

Airspace Management.

[FR Doc. 96–15063 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95–ANE–35]

Alteration of V–99, V–451 and J–62

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This rule alters Federal

Airways V–99, V–451, and Jet Route 62

(J–62) in the states of Massachusetts and

Connecticut. Specific portions of both

airways and the jet route, in the above

mentioned states, are no longer

necessary for navigation and are being

revoked. Removing these obsolete

segments will eliminate clutter on

aeronautical charts.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15,

1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia P. Crawford, Airspace and Rules

Division, ATA–400, Office of Air Traffic

Airspace Management, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone: (202) 267–8783.
29938 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 115 / Thursday, June 13, 1996 / Rules and Regulations

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On December 21, 1995, the FAA

proposed to amend Title 14 of the Code

of Federal Regulations part 71 (14 CFR

part 71) to alter V–99, V–451, and J–62

(60 FR 66181). Interested parties were

invited to participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received. Except for editorial

changes, this amendment is the same as

that proposed in the notice. Jet Routes

and Domestic Very High Frequency

Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal

airways are published in paragraphs

2004 and 6010(a), respectively, of FAA

Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995,

and effective September 16, 1995, which

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The jet route and airways listed in

this document will be published

subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71

alters V–99, V–451, and J–62. Specific

portions of both the airways and the jet

route are no longer necessary for

navigation and are being revoked. The

airspace designation for V–99 will be

revoked between Hartford, CT, and the

GRAYM intersection; V–451 will be

revoked between Groton, CT, and the

SEEDY intersection; and J–62 will be

revoked east of the Nantucket, CT, VOR.

Removing these obsolete segments will

eliminate clutter on aeronautical charts.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the

Federal Aviation Administration

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71—[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 71

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–

1963 Comp., p. 389; 14 CFR 11.69.

§ 71.1 [Amended]

2. The incorporation by reference in

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation

Administration Order 7400.9C, Airspace

Designations and Reporting Points,

dated August 17, 1995, and effective

September 16, 1995, is amended as

follows:

Paragraph 2004—Jet Routes

* * * * *

J–62 [Revised]

From Robbinsville, NJ; to Nantucket, MA.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6010(a)—Domestic VOR Federal

Airways

* * * * *

V–99 [Revised]

From LaGuardia, NY, via INT LaGuardia 043°

and Hartford, CT, 245° radials; Hartford.

* * * * *

V–451 [Revised]

From LaGuardia, NY; INT LaGuardia 063°

and Hampton, NY, 289° radials; INT

Hampton 289° and Calverton, NY, 044°

radials; INT Calverton 044° and Groton,

CT, 243° radials; Groton.

* * * * *

Issued in Washington, DC, on June 5, 1996.

Harold W. Becker,

Acting Program Director for Air Traffic

Airspace Management.

[FR Doc. 96–15061 Filed 6–12–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 93–AWP–4]

Alteration of Jet Routes J–86 and J–92

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This rule extends Jet Route 86

(J–86) from the Boulder City, NV, Very

High Frequency Omnidirectional Range/

Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) to

the Beatty, NV, VORTAC. This action

also realigns J–92 direct from the

Boulder City VORTAC to the Beattty

VORTAC. The FAA is taking this action

to enhance traffic flows and reduce

controllers’ workload.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, August 15,

1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bill Nelson, Airspace and Rules

Division ATA–400, Office of Air Traffic

Airspace Management, Federal Aviation

Administration, 800 Independence

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;

telephone: (202) 267–8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

On June 9, 1993, the FAA proposed to

amend Title 14 of the Code of Federal

Regulations part 71 (14 CFR part 71) to

alter J–86 and J–92 (58 FR 32313).

Interested parties were invited to

participate in this rulemaking

proceeding by submitting written

comments on the proposal to the FAA.

No comments objecting to the proposal

were received. Except for editorial

changes, this amendment is the same as

that proposed in the notice. Jet Routes

are published in paragraph 2004 of FAA

Order 7400.9C dated August 17, 1995,

and effective September 16, 1995, which

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The jet routes listed in this

document will be published

subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

This amendment to 14 CFR part 71

extends J–86 from the Boulder City, NV,

VORTAC to the Beatty, NV, VORTAC.

Extending J–86 will enable air traffic

controllers to provide pilots with an

alternate route from the Boulder City

VORTAC to the Beatty VORTAC during

the times Restricted Area 4808S is in

use. This action also realigns J–92 direct

from the Boulder City VORTAC to the

Beatty VORTAC, providing a route that

is normally requested by pilots. This

action will enhance the traffic flow and

reduce the controllers’ workload.

The FAA has determined that this

regulation only involves an established

body of technical regulations for which

frequent and routine amendments are

necessary to keep them operationally

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)

does not warrant preparation of a

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated

impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air

traffic procedures and air navigation, it

is certified that this rule will not have

a significant economic impact on a

substantial number of small entities