alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 603 

Recognizing the 140th anniversary of the birth of Mahatma Gandhi. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2009 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. MANZULLO) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 140th anniversary of the birth of Mahatma 

Gandhi. 

Whereas October 2, 2009, marks the 140th anniversary of 

the birth of Mahatma Gandhi; 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a great political leader, devout and spiritual Hindu, and leader of India’s nationalist movement; 

Whereas all his life Gandhi courageously supported, and in 

fact gave his life for, the cause of Hindu Muslim amity; 

Whereas Gandhi helped to make India the largest democracy 

in the world; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 603 IH 

Whereas his philosophy of nonviolent civil disobedience has 

influenced people around the world for the betterment of 

mankind; 

Whereas Gandhi developed the term Satyagraha, meaning 

vindication of truth, not by inflicting suffering on others 

but through nonviolent and patient self-suffering; 

Whereas his autobiography ‘‘My Experiments with Truth’’ reveals the inner voice of one of history’s most spiritual 

leaders; 

Whereas Gandhi counseled humankind to ‘‘Hate the sin, and 

love the sinner’’, urged people everywhere to ‘‘be the 

change you want to see in the world’’, and reminded the 

world that ‘‘Freedom is not worth having if it does not 

connote the freedom to err’’; and 

Whereas as a result of his timeless legacy, Gandhi’s name has 

come to symbolize freedom and justice around the world: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 140th anniversary of the 

3 birth of Mahatma Gandhi; 

4 (2) acknowledges and commends Mahatma 

5 Gandhi’s unique and lasting role in the establish6 ment of the state of India and its democratic institu7 tions, which will be revered for generations to come; 

8 and 

9 (3) congratulates the visionary leadership of 

10 Mahatma Gandhi, which enhanced the rapidly deep11 ening friendship between the United States and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 603 IH 

1 India, the world’s oldest and largest democracy, re2 spectively. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit
      23


Consent





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
      of
      Northway Financial, Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2007, relating to
      the
      consolidated statements of financial condition of Northway Financial, Inc.
      and
      Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated
      statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, comprehensive income
      and
      cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
      2006.





/S/
      Shatswell, Macleod & Company, P.C.


SHATSWELL,
      MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.





West
      Peabody, Massachusetts


March
      22,
      2007
#### Laura Ann LACEY, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Michael Robert LACEY, Respondent/Appellant.

No. 64764.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Nov. 22, 1994.

Allan H. Zerman, Cary J. Mogerman, Zer-man & Mogerman, L.L.C., Clayton, for appellant.

Thomas H. Lake, St. Louis, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals from the September 2, 1993 disolution decree of the trial court (as modified on September 17, 1993). We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. A written opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).
Index of Exhibits

1. Human Trafficking Not Buying It, June 2018

2. Human Trafficking Parents Teens, December 2019

3. Arizona Attorney General Spanish Booklet Human Trafficking, June 2020

4. Adult Webinar Tweet, August 19, 2020

5. Adult Webinar Slides, August 20, 2020

6. Teen Webinar Tweet, August 5, 2020

7. Teen Webinar Slides, August 6, 2020

8. Attorneys General Ask Congress to Amend Sex Trafficking Law - Arizona 

Attorney General Press Release, August 16, 2017

9. Brnovich Letter to Wicker re Section 230, August 16, 2017

10. Brnovich Letter Tweet, August 16, 2017

11. Arizona Antitrafficking Network AATN-Trust AZ Tweets, March 9, 2017, 

June 30, 2019, December 12, 2019, January 15, 2020

12. AATN-TRUST Facebook Video, March 16, 2017

13. Human Trafficking and Exploitation - Arizona Attorney General

https://www.facebook.com/270004956516789/videos/667563003427647 

Last accessed on September 23, 2020

14. Human Trafficking 101 TRUST AZ https://www.azag.gov/outreach/humantrafficking-exploitation last accessed September 23, 2020

15. Trust AZ -NCOSE Joins Brief to Prevent Backpage Owners From Hiding Assets 

To Avoid Payment of Damages to Sex Trafficking Victims – TRUST AZ, May 

2020 https://www.azag.gov/outreach/human-trafficking-exploitation

Last accessed September 23, 2020

16. aw-trust-shocking-facts https://trustaz.org/news/ncose-joins-brief-to-preventbackpage-owners-from-hiding-assets-to-avoid-payment-of-damages-to-sextrafficking-victims/ Last accessed on September 23, 2020

17. Internet Safety - Shared Hope https://www.trustaz.org/downloads/aw-trustshocking-facts.pdf Last accessed September 23, 2020

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 2
18. JuST Conference Brochure Excerpts https://Shared Hope.org/what-wedo/prevent/awareness/internetsafety/ Last accessed September 23, 2020

19. Just Program Tweet, June 27, 2016

20. Polaris Statement on Backpage – Polaris https://polarisproject.org/pressreleases/polaris-statement-on-backpage/ Last accessed on September 23, 2020

21. Attorney General Mark Brnovich Joins Cindy McCain in Fight Against Sex 

Trafficking Press Release January 6, 2015

22. Ruelas Roe-Sepowitz Article Tweet, January 18, 2015

23. What Sex Trafficking Really Means – AZCentral, January 17, 2015

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1060 Filed 09/23/20 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vision Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
      Berger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                  David BergerDavid
                  Berger
                Principal
                  Financial Officer
                August
                  12, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

6. Andrew Padilla,

 (Counts 1-51)

 

 Defendant.

NO. CR-18-00422-06-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER

The Court has considered Defendant Padilla’s unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Reply to Response to Motion for Itemization of Brady/Giglio Material (Doc. 

_____), and good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED the motion is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Padilla to 

file a reply to the government’s response to his motion for itemization of Brady/Giglio

material (Doc. 273) is extended to and including September 18, 2018.

The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h) _____ from _____ to 

_____.

Dated this _____ day of September, 2018.

____________________________________

Bridget S. Bade

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 297-1 Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CORRY WYSINGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JANET NIXON,

Defendant.

______________________________/

Case Number: 08-14386

HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND

DISMISSING CASE

I.

This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that

while housed at the Macomb Regional Facility (MRF), defendant, a nurse at MRF, was

deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

Plaintiff is currently on parole. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, despite

efforts by the magistrate judge, did not file a response to the motion nor did he provide

the Court with a current address. The magistrate judge issued a report and

recommendation (MJRR) recommending that defendant’s motion be granted. Plaintiff

has not objected to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. A copy of

the MJRR, which was sent to plaintiff’s last known address at the Gus Harrison

2:08-cv-14386-AC-PJK Doc # 18 Filed 09/01/09 Pg 1 of 2 Pg ID 195
2

Correctional Facility, was returned as undeliverable.

II.

Having reviewed the MJRR, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge that

plaintiff has not made out a claim of deliberate indifference. Accordingly, the findings

and conclusions of the magistrate judge are adopted as the findings and conclusions of

the Court. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. This case is

DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

 s/Avern Cohn

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: September 1, 2009

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of

record and Corry Wysinger, #228616, 2727 E. Beecher Street, Adrian, MI 49221 on this

date, September 1, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

 s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry

Case Manager, (313) 234-5160

2:08-cv-14386-AC-PJK Doc # 18 Filed 09/01/09 Pg 2 of 2 Pg ID 196
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeurogesX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeurogesX, Inc.

Dated: May 15, 2008



By:

/s/ Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonno President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/ Stephen F. GhiglieriStephen F. Ghiglieri Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 15.1
                                                                   ------------




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Vasogen Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following:

i.       Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Vasogen Inc., filed with the
         Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") (File No. 333-133328
         and File No. 333-115701);

ii.      Registration Statements on Form F-10 of Vasogen Inc, filed with the
         SEC (File No. 333-130578 and File No. 333-129491)

of our report dated January 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Vasogen Inc. as of November 30, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, deficit and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2006, which report appears in
the November 30, 2006 annual report on Form 20-F of Vasogen Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Toronto, Ontario
February 1, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31166-31167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15538]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,197]


Sea Isle Sportswear, New York, New York; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on April 8, 1996 in response to a worker petition which 
was filed March 26, 1996 on behalf of workers at Sea Isle Sportswear, 
New York, New York (TA-W-32,197).

[[Page 31167]]

    The petitioning group of workers are covered under an existing 
Trade Adjustment Assistance certification (TA-W-32,054A). Consequently, 
further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 6th day of June 1996.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 96-15538 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant. Antonio PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 62567, 65503.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 18, 1994.

Henry B. Robertson, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, C.J., REINHARD, P.J., and CRAHAN, J.

*789
      *ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. Defendant was sentenced to concurrent prison terms of twenty-five years and twenty years respectively. Defendant also appeals from an order denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The appeals have been consolidated. We affirm.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment and denial of post-conviction relief are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBEN PADILLA-AGUIRRE and

MARIA LUISA BARAJAS-VASQUEZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73652

Agency Nos. A094-945-147

 A094-945-146

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2010 ** 

San Francisco, California

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Ruben Padilla-Aguirre and Maria Luisa Barajas-Vasquez, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

FILED

DEC 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73652

denial of their motion to reopen the underlying denial of their applications for

cancellation of removal.

In their motion to reopen, petitioners introduced new evidence of hardship

that Barajas-Vasquez’s legal permanent resident father had suffered a knee injury

requiring an operation. We conclude that the BIA properly considered the new

evidence offered by petitioners, and acted within its broad discretion in

determining that the evidence did not establish extreme hardship, and was

insufficient to warrant reopening of the cancellation application. See Singh v. INS,

295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2000) (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall

be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), Samuel Spadafora, Chairman of the Board and Chief Strategy Officer of Chordiant Software, Inc. (the Company), Stephen Kelly, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and George de Urioste, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



1.  The Companys Transition Report on Form 10-K/T for the period ended September 30, 2004,
and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Transitional Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2.  The information contained in the Transition
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 28th day of March, 2005.





/S/    SAMUEL
SPADAFORASamuel Spadafora, Chairman
of the Board, Chief Strategy Officer and Director/S/    STEPHEN
KELLYStephen Kelly, Chief Executive
Officer/S/    GEORGE DE
URIOSTEGeorge de Urioste, Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K/T to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Chordiant Software, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1934,
as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/T), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer   I, Patricia J. Barton, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BBN Global Consulting, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;   1   5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: June 18, 2007  /s/Patricia J. Barton Patricia J. Barton Title: Chief Financial Officer  2
#### The State, ex rel. Russell, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 22920

Decided June 17, 1931.)

*Mr. Benjamin E. Seibert,*for relator.

*653(November 4, 1931.)

*Mr. Gilbert Bettman,*attorney general, and *Mr. B. R. Zurmehly,*for respondent.

This cause came on to be heard upon the demurrer of the relator to the answer and supplemental answer of the defendant. On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that said demurrer be, and the same is hereby, sustained. Leave is hereby given to the defendant to answer within thirty days and if no answer is filed within that time it is ordered and adjudged that the writ of mandamus prayed for be allowed.

*Decree accordingly.*

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkahe and Robinson, JJ., concur.

On Motion.

This cause came on to be heard on the motion of the relator to vacate the order of the court journalized on October 6,1931, allowing the defendant leave to file an amended answer, and also upon relator’s motion to strike such amended answer from the files.

It is the opinion of the court that said motion is well taken and it is ordered and adjudged by the court that said entry of October 6, 1931, be vacated and the amended answer stricken from the files; and it is further ordered and adjudged that a writ of mandamus issue against the respondent as prayed for in the petition of the relator and in accordance with this court’s journal entry of June 17,1931.

*Writ allowed.*

Jones, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 31, 2017

No. 04-16-00380-CR

Richard PRIETO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9942

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as appellate counsel. The 

motion is GRANTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5.

The trial court must determine whether appellant is indigent, and if so, appellate counsel 

must be appointed. It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED to the trial court. See 

Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may 

abate appeals so that trial court can assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). The 

trial court is ORDERED to determine whether appellant is indigent. If appellant is indigent, the 

trial court is ORDERED to appoint new appellate counsel. The trial court is FURTHER 

ORDERED to cause the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

documentation that either (a) appellant is not indigent or (b) the appointment of counsel within 

30 days from the date this order is signed. After the supplemental clerk’s record is filed, the 

appeal will be reinstated on the docket of this court. All appellate deadlines are suspended 

until this reinstatement.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court