29370 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices

Division of Omya, Inc. (VMPDO). This

Service Agreement specifies that

VMPDO has signed on to and has agreed

to the terms and conditions of NMPC’s

Power Sales Tariff designated as

NMPC’s FERC Electric Tariff, Original

Volume No. 2. This Tariff, approved by

FERC on April 15, 1994, and which has

an effective date of March 13, 1993, will

allow NMPC and VMPDO to enter into

separately scheduled transactions under

which NMPC will sell to VMPDO

capacity and/or energy as the parties

may mutually agree.

In its filing letter, NMPC also

included a Certificate of Concurrence

executed by the Purchaser.

NMPC requests an effective date of

April 21, 1996. NMPC has requested

waiver of the notice requirements for

good cause shown.

NMPC has served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and VMPDO.

Comment date: June 17, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

[Docket No. ER96–1879–000]

Take notice that on May 21, 1996,

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

(NMPC), tendered for filing with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

an executed Service Agreement between

NMPC and Federal Energy Sales, Inc.

(FES). This Service Agreement specifies

that FES has signed on to and has

agreed to the terms and conditions of

NMPC’s Power Sales Tariff designated

as NMPC’s FERC Electric Tariff,

Original Volume No. 2. This Tariff,

approved by FERC on April 15, 1994,

and which has an effective date of

March 13, 1993, will allow NMPC and

FES to enter into separately scheduled

transactions under which NMPC will

sell to FES capacity and/or energy as the

parties may mutually agree.

In its filing letter, NMPC also

included a Certificate of Concurrence

executed by the Purchaser.

NMPC requests an effective date of

May 9, 1996. NMPC has requested

waiver of the notice requirements for

good cause shown.

NMPC has served copies of the filing

upon the New York State Public Service

Commission and FES.

Comment date: June 17, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Cinergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. ER96–1880–000]

Take notice that on May 21, 1996,

Cinergy Services, Inc. (Cinergy),

tendered for filing on behalf of its

operating company, PSI Energy, Inc.

(PSI), a First Supplemental Agreement,

dated May 1, 1996, to the

Interconnection Agreement, dated July

1, 1996 between Electric Clearinghouse,

Inc. (ECI) and PSI.

The First Supplemental Agreement

revises the definition for Emission

Allowances and provides for Cinergy

Services to act as agent for PSI. The

following Exhibit has also been revised:

B Power Sales by Cinergy.

Cinergy and ECI have requested an

effective date of May 24, 1996.

Copies of the filing were served on

Electric Clearinghouse, Inc., the Texas

Public Utility Commission, the

Kentucky Public Service Commission,

Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and

the Indiana Utility Regulatory

Commission.

Comment date: June 17, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Texas Utilities Electric Company

[Docket No. ER96–1881–000]

Take notice that on May 21, 1996,

Texas Utilities Electric Company (TU

Electric), tendered for filing two

executed transmission service

agreements (TSAs) with Koch Power

Services, Inc. and Vitol Gas & Electric

LLC for certain Economy Energy

Transmission Service under TU

Electric’s Tariff for Transmission

Service To, From and Over Certain

HVDC Interconnections.

TU Electric requests an effective date

for the TSA’s that will permit them to

become effective on or before the service

commencement date under each of the

two TSA’s. Accordingly, TU Electric

seeks waiver of the Commission’s notice

requirements. Copies of the filing were

served on Koch Power Services, Inc. and

Vitol Gas & Electric LLC, as well as the

Public Utility Commission of Texas.

Comment date: June 17, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. PECO Energy Company

[Docket No. ER96–1882–000]

Take notice that on May 21, 1996,

PECO Energy Company (PECO), filed a

Service Agreement dated April 23, 1996

with Duke Power Company (Duke

Power) under PECO’s FERC Electric

Tariff Original Volume No. 4 (Tariff).

The Service Agreement adds Duke

Power as a customer under the Tariff.

PECO requests an effective date of

April 23, 1996, for the Service

Agreement.

PECO states that copies of this filing

have been supplied to Duke Power and

to the Pennsylvania Public Utility

Commission.

Comment date: June 17, 1996, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 96–14581 Filed 6–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Cases Filed; Week of January 22

Through January 26, 1996

During the Week of January 22

through January 26, 1996, the appeals

and applications for exception or other

relief listed in the Appendix to this

Notice were filed with the Office of

Hearings and Appeals of the Department

of Energy.

Under DOE procedural regulations, 10

CFR Part 205, any person who will be

aggrieved by the DOE action sought in

these cases may file written comments

on the application within ten days of

service of notice, as prescribed in the

procedural regulations. For purposes of

the regulations, the date of service of

notice is deemed to be the date of

publication of this Notice or the date of

receipt by an aggrieved person of actual

notice, whichever occurs first. All such

comments shall be filed with the Office

of Hearings and Appeals, Department of

Energy, Washington, DC 20585.

Dated: May 29, 1996.

George B. Breznay,

Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 112 / Monday, June 10, 1996 / Notices 29371

LIST OF CASES RECEIVED BY THE OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS

[Week of Jan. 22 through Jan. 26, 1996]

Date Name and location of applicant Case No. Type of submission

Jan. 22, 1996 Archie M. LeGrand, Jr., Summerton, South

Carolina.

VFA–0120 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

December 11, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by the Freedom of Information Privacy Act

Division would be rescinded, and Archie M. LeGrand, Jr.

would receive access to certain Department of Energy

Information.

Do ........... Barton J. Bernstein, Stanford, California ...... VFA–0117 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

December 22, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by Albuquerque Operations Office would

be rescinded, and Barton J. Bernstein would receive access to certain DOE information.

Do ........... Jeffrey R. Leist, Mentor, Ohio ...................... VFA–0119 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

December 27, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by the DOE Mound Facility would be rescinded, and Jeffrey R. Leist would receive access to

certain DOE information.

Do ........... Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chelsey Co.,

Cincinnati, Ohio.

VFA–0118 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

August 9, 1995 Freedom of information Request Denial

issued by the DOE Mound Facility would be rescinded,

and Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chelsey Co. would receive access to certain DOE information.

Jan. 23, 1996 Martha Julian, Newburgh, Indiana ............... VFA–0121 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 8, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Albuquerque Operations Office would be

rescinded, and Martha Julian would receive access to

certain DOE information.

Jan. 24, 1996 Frank Thompson Transport, El Dorado, Arizona.RR272–230 Request for Modification/Rescission in the Crude Oil Refund Proceeding. If granted: The January 23, 1996 Dismissal Letter, Case Number RF272–78153, issued to

Frank Thompson Transport would be modified regarding

the firm’s application for refund submitted in the Crude

Oil Refund Proceeding.

Jan. 25, 1996 Eugene Maples, Hopkins, South Carolina ... VFA–0122 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

November 29, 1995 Freedom of Information Request

Denial issued by the Office of Inspector General would

be rescinded, and Eugene Maples would receive certain

Department of Energy information.

Do ........... James H. Stebbings, Naperville, Illinois ....... VFA–0123 Appeal of an Information Request Denial. If granted: The

January 4, 1996 Freedom of Information Request Denial

issued by the Argonne National Laboratory would be rescinded, and James H. Stebbings would receive access

to certain DOE information.

Jan. 26, 1996 Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office, West Mifflin, Pennsylvania.VSO–0081 Request for Hearing under 10 C.F.R. Part 710. If granted:

An individual employed at Pittsburgh Naval Reactors Office would receive a hearing under 10 C.F.R. Part 710,

entitled ‘‘Criteria and Procedures for Determining Eligibility for Access to Classified Matter or Special Nuclear

Material.’’

[FR Doc. 96–14578 Filed 6–7–96; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Implementation of Special Refund

Procedures

AGENCY: Office of Hearings and Appeals,

Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Implementation of

Special Refund Procedures.

SUMMARY: The Office of Hearings and

Appeals of the Department of Energy

announces procedures for the

disbursement of $592,001 (plus accrued

interest) collected pursuant to a consent

order with Macmillan Oil Company

(Case No. LEF–0046) and $15,822 (plus

accrued interest) collected pursuant to a

consent order with Kenny Larson Oil

Company (Case No. VEF–0002). The

funds will be distributed in accordance

with the DOE’s special refund

procedures, 10 CFR part 205, subpart V.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bryan F. MacPherson, Assistant

Director, Office of Hearings and

Appeals, Department of Energy,

Washington, DC. 20585, (202) 426–1562.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In

accordance with § 205.282(b) of the

procedural regulations of the

Department of Energy (DOE), 10 CFR

§ 205.282(b), notice is hereby given of

the issuance of the Decision and Order

set out below. The Decision and Order

specifies the procedures that will be

used to distribute monies that have been

collected by the DOE pursuant to

consent orders with Macmillan Oil

Company (Macmillan) and Kenny

Larson Oil Company (Larson). The

consent order with Macmillan settled

possible pricing violations with respect

to Macmillan’s sales of propane, No. 2

fuel oil and Nos. 5 and 6 residual fuel

oil. The DOE has collected $592,001

from Macmillan. The consent order with

Larson settled possible pricing

violations with respect to Larson’s sales

of motor gasoline. The DOE has