alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lawrence C. STOJAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 63594.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Oct. 5, 1993.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Elizabeth L. Ziegler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pleaded guilty to two counts of sale of a controlled substance. We find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(1) and (5).

We further find an opinion in this matter would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A *830memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1171 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1171

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore State 
  authority to waive the 35-mile rule for designating critical access 
                 hospitals under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2009

   Mr. Pryor (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Isakson, Mr. 
 Chambliss, Mr. Lugar, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to restore State 
  authority to waive the 35-mile rule for designating critical access 
                 hospitals under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Access Flexibility Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. RESTORING STATE AUTHORITY TO WAIVE THE 35-MILE RULE FOR 
              MEDICARE CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL DESIGNATIONS.

    Section 1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395i-4(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)) is amended by inserting ``or on or after the 
date of enactment of the Critical Access Flexibility Act of 2009'' 
after ``January 1, 2006,''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consentof Independent Auditors**

The Board of Directors and StockholdersHorizon Organic Holding Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements (Nos. 333-37864, 333-64905 and 333-101273) onForm S-8 of Horizon Organic Holding Corporation of our report datedFebruary 3, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HorizonOrganic Holding Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Horizon Organic HoldingCorporation.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP      |
|-------------------|
| Boulder, Colorado |
| March 12, 2003    |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

Before the Court is Beinert Katzman Littrell Williams LLP’s Motion to Withdraw 

as Retained Counsel and Declaration of Thomas H. Bienert, Jr. (Doc. 1488). Therein, 

attorneys for James Larkin move to withdraw as his counsel, saying that Mr. Larkin 

terminated their legal services and representation on October 29, 2022. (Id.) During the 

Status Conference on November 2, 2022, Mr. Larkin represented that he was currently 

looking for new counsel. The Court will hold the Motion to Withdraw in abeyance until 

Mr. Larkin’s new counsel files a Notice of Appearance. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that a Notice of Appearance shall be filed by Mr. Larkin’s new 

counsel by November 22, 2022. 

Dated this 9th day of November, 2022.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1502 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 1
Form of Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan Restricted Stock Award Ltr




 EXHIBIT 10(liii) 
 

 
 NAME 
 ADDRESS 
 CITY, STATE ZIP 
 Dear
            : 
 As a new employee of Anadarko, we believe that you will make an immediate
contribution to the success of the Company and are therefore pleased to grant you this restricted stock award under the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. This award represents a valuable component of your total
compensation package. 
 Effective                     ,
you were granted              Restricted Shares, which vest over a period of time. Provided you remain continuously employed with Anadarko until such dates, one-third of the restricted
shares will vest on [date], one-third on [date], and the remaining one-third on [date] (each date considered a “Vesting Period”). 
 This grant is
subject to all terms and conditions of the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) and the provisions of this letter. The Plan is available via the Anadarko intranet at the following address:
http://insider/hr/stock_plan.htm. 
 You may elect, at the time restricted stock is granted to you, to treat the fair market value of the restricted
stock on the date of grant as compensation income instead of the value on the date the restrictions lapse. You must make the Section 83(b) election within 30 days from the date the restricted stock is granted. If you make a Section 83(b)
election and the restricted stock is forfeited to Anadarko, you are not allowed to deduct the amount included as taxable income at a later date. Dividends received on restricted shares after a Section 83(b) election is made will be treated as
dividend income in the year received. 
 At the end of each Vesting Period, the value attributed to the number of the restricted shares that vests on such
date shall be reduced by the applicable payroll taxes as a result of such vesting. Your net shares will be deposited into a Merrill Lynch brokerage account. Attached is the information about the Merrill Lynch program. 
 If you voluntarily terminate your employment, including retirement, or in the event you are terminated for cause, all of your unvested restricted shares will be
immediately forfeited. If you are terminated as a result of death, disability (as defined in the Company’s disability plan), involuntary termination without cause, or a change of control event (as defined in the Plan), all of your unvested
restricted shares will immediately vest. 
 Your restricted shares may not be transferred, sold, assigned, pledged, exchanged, hypothecated or otherwise
transferred, or disposed of to the extent then subject to restrictions. You will have voting rights and received dividends during the restricted period. Once your restricted shares have vested and shares of Anadarko common stock have been delivered
to you, you are free to sell, gift or otherwise dispose of such shares; provided that you comply with the applicable restrictions under the Company’s Insider Trading Policy. 
 If you have any questions on this grant, please call                     , Stock Plan Administrator at
            . 
 Sincerely,
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-15-00071-CV

In the Matter of the Marriage of Alexandra Elizabeth Cain and Elizabeth Cain and 

In the Interest of G.K.C. and C.A.C., Children

(No. 15-D-0231-102 IN 102ND DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

FILING

$10.00

$205.00

E-PAID

NOT PAID

MARK LESHER

M. MARK LESHER

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: $205.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

December 18, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
IV 

House Calendar No. 152 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 980 

[Report No. 111–403] 

Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit to 

the House of Representatives a copy of the Transportation Security 

Administration’s Aviation Security Screening Management Standard Operating Procedures manual in effect on December 5, 2009, and any 

subsequent revisions of such manual in effect prior to the adoption 

of this resolution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2009 

Mr. DENT (for himself, Mr. KING of New York, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. DANIEL

E. LUNGREN of California, Mr. OLSON, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, and 

Mr. AUSTRIA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Homeland Security 

JANUARY 27, 2010 

Reported adversely from the Committee on Homeland Security, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Security 

to transmit to the House of Representatives a copy of 

the Transportation Security Administration’s Aviation 

Security Screening Management Standard Operating 

Procedures manual in effect on December 5, 2009, and 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 980 RH 

any subsequent revisions of such manual in effect prior 

to the adoption of this resolution. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives directs 

2 the Secretary of Homeland Security to transmit to the 

3 House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the 

4 date of adoption of this resolution, a copy of the Transpor5 tation Security Administration’s Aviation Security Screen6 ing Management Standard Operating Procedures manual 

7 in effect on December 5, 2009, and any subsequent revi8 sions of such manual in effect prior to the adoption of 

9 this resolution. 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS

hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 152 

111TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 980 

[Report No. 111–403] 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Sethe adoption of this resolution. quent revisions of such manual in effect prior to in effect on December 5, 2009, and any subse- agement Standard Operating Procedures manual ministration’s Aviation Security Screening Man- tives a copy of the Transportation Security Ad- curity to transmit to the House of RepresentaJANUARY 27, 2010 

Reported adversely from the Committee on Homeland Sebe printed curity, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report (the Report) on the Form 10-Q of Siga Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended January 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bob Hogarth, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Date: October 2, 2013   /s/ BOB HOGARTH Bob Hogarth Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| /s/ Richard A. Robert                                                                                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Robert                                                                                                                   |   |
| Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) May 13, 2011 |   |
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Saul LUCIO-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-51112.

Conference Calendar

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 20, 2003.

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.*

Saul Lucio-Diaz appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry. He argues that the district court erred by increasing his base offense level by 16 levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Lucio did not raise this objection in the district court, and, therefore, our review is for plain error only. *See United States v. Vasquez,*216 F.3d 456, 459 (5th Cir.2000).

Section 2L1.1(b)(1)(A) provides that “[i]f the defendant previously was deported, ... after a conviction for a felony that is [ ] a drug trafficking offense for which the sentence imposed exceeded 13 months,” the base offense level is to be increased by 16 levels. U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(1)(A) (2001). According to the presentence report, Lucio was convicted of trafficking by possession with intent to distribute cocaine and was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment. Lucio offered no evidence rebutting the reported length of this sentence; therefore, the presentence report bore sufficient indicia of reliability such that it was not plainly erroneous for the district court to apply the 16-level enhancement. *See United States v. Huerta,*182 F.3d 361, 364 (5th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jemille Shimar McAfee, Appellant

No. 06-22-00169-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 22-

0050X). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Rambin, Chief Justice Stevens

and Justice van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Jemille Shimar McAfee, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 11, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 31.4


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Mark Shifke, certify that:


|   |                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q/A of Green Dot Corporation; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date:June 7, 2017By:/s/ Mark ShifkeName:Mark ShifkeChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CX2 Technologies., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Rand Chief Executive Officer, President, and Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|    | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                                                                                          
|--- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |    
|and
|    |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|    | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |                                                                                                          
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 16, 2009 |                                                                                                          
|By:                     | /s/ Michael D. Rand                                                                                      
|                        | Michael D. Rand, Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Executive Financial and Accounting Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00703- CV
Mabel Sustaita, App ellant

v. San An gelo Independ ent School District and Carol Ann Bon ds, S uperintendent, App ellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 51ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. A-1 1-0 141- C, H ONO RAB LE B ARB ARA L. WALTH ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Mabel Sustaita filed her notice of appea l on October 22 , 2 0 1 2
. On J anuar y 24, 2013, the cler

k of this Court sent a letter to appellant, notifying her that the cler k’s rec ord
was overdue and re q u es t i n g that she make pay ment arr ang ements for the repor ter’s rec ord and submit a status repor

t reg arding this appea l. The overdue -re cord notice also informed appellant that if she failed to make pay

ment arr ang ements or respond to the Court’s notice by Fe bruar y 4, 2013, her a ppeal wa s subject to dismiss al for w ant of prose cution.

To date, appellant has not responde d to this Court’s notice. Acc ording ly , we dismiss the appe al for w ant of prose cution. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.3(b), ( c).__________________________________________ J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: F ebrua

ry 28, 2013

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of iLinc Communications, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report). I, James L.
Dunn, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



By: /s/ James L. Dunn, Jr.
--------------------------
James L. Dunn, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
June 27, 2008
EX 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of PITOOEY!, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob DiMartino, acting in the capacity of President, Principal Accounting Officer,
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Jacob DiMartino

Jacob DiMartino

President

Principal Accounting Officer

Chief Financial Officer



May 15, 2014