alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eugene HARRIS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

No. 65240.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

July 26, 1994.

Judith C. LaRose, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and GARY M. GAERTNER and CRAHAN, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 19, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15488]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Docket No. C-3639]


Genetus Alexandria, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, the 
Virginia-based corporations and their officers from misrepresenting the 
nature of extent of a physician's participation in any treatment 
procedure, the safety or efficacy of any treatment procedure, and the 
extent to which a treatment is covered by a patient's medical 
insurance. The consent order requires the respondents to pay $250,000 
in consumer redress to the Commission.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued February 12, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and Decision and Order are available 
from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th Street & 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sondra Mills or Eric Bash, FTC/H-200, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 
326-2673 or 326-2892.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Tuesday, September 26, 1995, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 60 FR 49605, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Genetus Alexandria, Inc., et 
al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to cease and desist, as set forth in the proposed 
consent agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-15488 Filed 6-18-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 126 (Friday, June 28, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 33765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[Docket No. 4310-DN; MT-067-1220-01-23-1A]


Notice of Use Restriction--Seasonal Closure of Trails in the Ear 
Mountain ONA; Montana

AGENCY: Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Great Falls 
Resource Area.

ACTION: Notice of use restrictions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: To protect significant wildlife resources, a seasonal trail 
closure is in effect each year from December 15-July 1.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard L Hopkins, Area Manager, Great 
Falls Resource Area, 812 14th Street North, Great Falls, MT 59403. 
Phone (406) 727-0503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The trails within the Ear Mountain 
Outstanding Natural Area (ONA), located in T.24N, R.8W, Sec. 5, 6, 7, 
and 8, PMM, Teton County, Montana, are closed seasonally. Signs stating 
the trail closure dates will be posted on trails accessing the Ear 
Mountain ONA. Access inside the Ear Mountain ONA boundary, during the 
closure dates, will be limited to permitted users and authorized Bureau 
of Land Management officials. Authority for this closure is found in 43 
CFR 8364.1. Any person who fails to comply with a closure issued under 
43 CFR 8364, may be subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 8360.0-
7: violations are punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or 
imprisonment not to exceed 12 months.
    The Ear Mountain ONA trailhead and picnic facilities are open year 
round.

    Dated: June 14, 1996.
Gary Slagel,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 96-16294 Filed 6-27-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GR-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-61367) of LJL BioSystems, Inc. of our report
dated January 15, 1999, except as to Note 11, which is as of January 27, 1999,
appearing on page 32 of the Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the application of such report to the Financial Statement Schedule
for the three years ended December 31, 1998 listed under Exhibit 27.1 of this
Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K when such schedule is read in
conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our report.
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
San Jose, California
March 26, 1999
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), Robert C. Bowen, the Chief Executive Officer of Scientific
Learning Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2004, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 25, 2005 /s/ Robert C. BowenRobert C. Bowen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 This certification accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date
of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 965 

Repealing rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating 

to the statutory limit on the public debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2009 

Ms. BEAN (for herself, Mr. COOPER, and Mr. MITCHELL) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Repealing rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives relating to the statutory limit on the public 

debt. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXVIII of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives (relating to the statutory limit on the 

3 public debt) is repealed and rule XXIX is redesignated as 

4 rule XXVIII. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JOEL ALEXIS ROM ER O-GIR ON, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-10162

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-00924-JGZ M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Je nnife r G. Zipps, District Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 12, 2014 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , WA RDLAW , a

nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Joe l Ale xis Rom e ro-Giron a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his jury -tria l c onvic t ion a nd 51-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry a fte r de porta tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ro m e ro-Giron’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no 

# FIL ED JUN 17 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c o unse l of re c ord. W e have provide d R om e ro-Giron the opportunity to filea pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or an s we ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. R om e ro-Giron’ s pro se m otion for a ppointm e nt of ne w c ounse l is DE NIE D . The gove rnm e nt’ s m otion to allow la t e filing of the A nde rs le tte r is G RANT E D . AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 0 1 6 2 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15411]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1118-DR]


North Dakota; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of North Dakota (FEMA-1118-DR), dated June 5, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 7, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of North Dakota, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of June 5, 1996:

    Burleigh, Grant, Morton and Sargent Counties for Public 
Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-15411 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### HOUSTON HEALTH CLUBS, INC., D/B/A President and First Lady Health and Racquetball Club, Petitioner, v. Dave A. RICKEY, Respondent.

No. D-4411.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Argued Feb. 17, 1994.

Decided Oct. 6, 1994.

Charles Seymore, Gary M. Pritchard, Houston, for petitioner.

Hugh J. Howerton, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The order of this Court of February 2, 1994, granting Houston Health Clubs’ application for writ of error is withdrawn, as the application was improvidently granted.

In denying the application for writ of error, we neither approve nor disapprove of the court of appeals’ treatment of Rickey’s claims under the Deceptive Trade Praetices-Con-sumer Protection Act, Tex.Bus. & Com.Code *813§§ 17.46(b)(5) & 17.46(b)(7). The application for writ of error is hereby denied.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 6, 2011

t0503 

# Order

May 6, 2011

140193 (48)

JEROME PLUNKETT, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF HOLLY MARIE PLUNKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140193 COA: 284320 Ingham CC: 05-000166-MD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 11, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.

M ARILYN K ELLY , J., would grant reconsideration for the reasons stated in her dissenting statement in this cas e, 488 Mich ___ (2011).

H ATHAWAY , J., would grant reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal.

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to a fa milial relationship with counsel of

record.

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 27, 2011 | /s/   JASON M. MORTON                       |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Jason M. Morton                                       |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer,                              |
|                     | III to I International MaritimeSolutions Cayman, Inc. |

----
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15910]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

Commission ON United States--Pacific Trade and Investment Policy/Office 
of the United States Trade Representative


Notice of Meeting of the Commission on United States Pacific 
Trade and Investment Policy

AGENCY: Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and Investment 
Policy/Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice that the June 26, 1996, meeting of the Commission on 
United States--Pacific Trade and Investment Policy will be held from 
7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 
7:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. and from 11:30 a.m. The meeting will be open to 
the public from 8:45 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and Investment 
Policy will hold a meeting on June 26, 1996, from 7:30 a.m. to 6:30 
p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 7:30 a.m. to 8:45 
a.m. and from 11:30 a.m. to 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The meeting will 
include a review and discussion of current issues affecting U.S. trade 
policy with Asia. Pursuant to Section 2155(f)(2) of Title 19 of the 
United States Code, the USTR has determined that this portion of the 
meeting will be concerned with matters the disclosure of which would 
seriously compromise the development by the United States Government of 
trade policy, priorities, negotiating objectives or bargaining 
positions with respect to the operation of any trade agreement and 
other matters arising in connection with the development, 
implementation and administration of the trade policy of the United 
States. The meeting will be open to the public and press from 8:45 a.m. 
to 11:30 a.m. At this time the Commission will continue the study phase 
of its work and consider: The role of technology in our trade and 
investment policy with the Pacific region. Attendance during this part 
of the meeting is for observation only. Individuals who are not members 
of the Commission will not be invited to comment.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for June 26, 1996, unless otherwise 
notified.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at Applied Materials, Inc., Bowers 
Campus, Building 12, 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, Santa Clara, CA 95054, 
unless otherwise notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Adams, Executive Director of the Commission on United States--
Pacific Trade and Investment Policy, Room 400, 600 17th Street, NW, 
Washington, D.C. 20508, (202) 395-9679.

Nancy Adams,
Executive Director, Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and 
Investment Policy.
Jeffrey Lang,
United States Trade Representative, Acting.
[FR Doc. 96-15910 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

James Larkin, 

 Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00422-02-PHX-SPL 

ORDER 

 On July 20, 2018, the Court held a hearing on Defendant Larkin’s Motion to 

Modify Conditions of Release (Doc. 183) and denied the motion, as stated on the record. 

However, without objection from the parties, and to conform to the understanding of the 

parties and Pretrial Services, the Court amends the location monitoring condition in the 

Order Setting Conditions of Release (Doc. 93) to clarify that Defendant is subject to 

active GPS location monitoring, not location monitoring in the discretion of the Pretrial 

Services officer, as erroneously indicated on the order. 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Order Setting Conditions of Release (Doc. 93) is 

AMENDED to require active GPS location monitoring. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other conditions of release previously 

imposed shall remain in full force and effect. 

 Dated this 20th day of July, 2018. 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 224 Filed 07/20/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of NeurogesX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NeurogesX, Inc.

Dated: November 7, 2008



By:

/s/ Anthony A. DiTonnoAnthony A. DiTonnoPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)By:

/s/ Stephen F. GhiglieriStephen F. GhiglieriChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Peter THOMPSON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. 19656.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.

March 8, 1995.

*906Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for movant-ap-pellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

PREWITT, Judge.

Movant-Appellant pleaded guilty to second degree murder and was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. Thereafter, he filed a motion under Rule 24.035 seeking to vacate the conviction. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered judgment denying the motion.

On appeal, Movant contends that he was entitled to the relief sought because he was “coerced into pleading guilty by his attorneys and by the short time he had in which to make a decision.” Movant testified that he was pressured into accepting a plea arrangement by which he would plead guilty and receive twenty years’ imprisonment by the conduct of his attorneys and because he only had one day to consider whether to accept the arrangement. Testimony at the motion hearing from Movant’s attorneys in the criminal case indicates no such coercion.

Review is “limited to a determination of whether the findings and conclusions of the trial court are clearly erroneous.” Rule 24.035(j). On appeal, the credibility of witnesses is generally a matter for the trial court’s determination to which an appellate court gives considerable deference. *Pool v. State,*670 S.W.2d 210, 211 (Mo.App.1984). The trial judge may reject testimony, even when uncontradicted. *Id,.; Trimble v. State,*588 S.W.2d 168, 170 (Mo.App.1979).

Under the standard of review and giving due deference to the trial court’s views on the credibility of witnesses, the judgment must be affirmed. The judgment was based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

PARRISH and CROW, JJ., concur.