alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cody
      Resources, Inc. for the quarter ended August 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cody Resources, Inc. for the quarter
              ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended August 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of Cody Resources,
              Inc..
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                Donald SampsonName:
            Donald
                L. SampsonTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            October
                15, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Paul J. Cambria, Jr. (NY 15873, admitted pro hac vice) 

pcambria@lglaw.com 

Erin E. McCampbell (NY 4480166, admitted pro hac vice) 

emccampbell@lglaw.com 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120 

Buffalo, New York 14202 

Telephone: (716) 849-1333 

Facsimile: (716) 855-1580 

Attorneys for Defendant Michael Lacey 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey 

 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CR-18-00422-PHX-DLR 

DEFENDANT LACEY’S JOINDER IN 

DEFENDANT BRUNST’S OPPOSITION 

TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO 

DEFER DISCLOSURE OF CARL 

FERRER’S JENCKS ACT STATEMENTS 

AND OBJECTION TO IN CAMERA

FILING OF THE SAME, AND REQUEST 

FOR DISCLOSURE OF THE SAME (DOC. 

477) 

Defendant Michael Lacey, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby joins in 

Defendant John Brunst’s Opposition to Government’s Motion to Defer Disclosure of Carl 

Ferrer’s Jencks Act Statements and Objection to in camera Filing of the Same, and Request for 

Disclosure of the Same (Doc. 477), and adopts the positions set forth in said motion as if fully 

set forth herein. Defendant Lacey is in agreement with the arguments made in Defendant 

Brunst’s opposition, and the issues raised by Defendant Brunst apply with equal force to 

Defendant Lacey. 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 490 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 4th day of March, 2019 

 LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP 

 /s/ Paul J. Cambria, Jr. 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Michael Lacey 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 490 Filed 03/04/19 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 4th day of March 2019, I electronically transmitted a PDF version 

of this document to the Clerk of the Court by filing with the CM/ECF system and understand a 

copy of the filing will be emailed to the attorneys of record. 

By: /s/ Kristina Drewery 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 490 Filed 03/04/19 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Minatura Gold (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Dias, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/S/ Paul DiasPaul DiasChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerAugust 6, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15432]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Justice
[OJP (NIJ) No.1084]
RIN 1121-ZA36


Reminder of Deadline for Receipt of Proposals for Law Enforcement 
and Corrections Technology Research

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, U.S. 
Department of Justice.

ACTION: The National Institute of Justice (NIJ), Office of Science and 
Technology reminds interested parties that June 17, 1996 is the 
biannual closing date for receipt at NIJ of research proposals to 
enhance law enforcement and corrections technologies under the NIJ 
1995-96 Research Plan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties should obtain a copy of the NIJ 1995-96 Research 
Plan by contacting the National Criminal Justice Reference Service 
(NCJRS) at (800) 851-3420. The NIJ 1995-96 Research Plan is also 
available electronically via the NCJRS Bulletin Board System on the 
Internet (telnet to ncjrsbbs.aspensys.com or gopher to 
ncjrs.aspensys.com 71).

DATES: The deadline for receipt of proposals is close of business on 
June 17, 1996.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Justice, Office of Science and 
Technology, 633 Indiana Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. 20531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tawana Waugh, U.S. Department of 
Justice Response Center, at 800-421-6770 (in Metropolitan Washington, 
DC, 202-307-1480).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following supplementary information is 
provided:

Authority

    This action is authorized under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968, Secs. 201-03, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3721-23 
(1988).
Jeremy Travis,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 96-15432 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the quarterly report of GetPokerRakeBack.com, a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), Hai Yan Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to her knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

July 14, 2009

By: /s/ Hai Yan Huang 
Hai Yan Huang 
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GetPokerRakeBack.com and will be retained by GetPokerRakeBack.com and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its  staff upon request.]

---
----

----

| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Earl T. Shannon       |   |   |   |   |
| Earl      T. Shannon,President |   |   |   |   |

|                                                  |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      Scott W. Bodenweber                          |   |   |   |   |
| Scott      W. Bodenweber,Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Pacific Copper
      Corp. (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
      that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2008(the “Form
      10-QSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained
      in
      the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      June 12, 2008





/s/
                Andrew A. BrodkeyAndrew
                A. Brodkey, CEO and President(Chief
                Executive Officer and President of Pacific Copper
                Corp.)





Dated:
      June 12, 2008





/s/
                Rakesh MalhotraRakesh
                Malhotra, C.A., Chief Financial Officer(Chief
                Financial Officer of Pacific Copper
                Corp.)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacific Copper Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Copper Corp. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1014 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 to make technical 

corrections to a provision relating to project deauthorizations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 11, 2009 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 

to make technical corrections to a provision relating to 

project deauthorizations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO PROJECT 

4 DEAUTHORIZATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3181 of the Water Re6 sources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110–114; 

7 121 Stat. 1158) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 1014 IS

1 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (4) 

2 through (11) as paragraphs (5), (6), (8), (9), 

3 (10), (11), (12), and (13), respectively; 

4 (B) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(4) NORTHEAST HARBOR, MAINE.—The 

7 project for navigation, Northeast Harbor, Maine, au8 thorized by section 2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 

9 (59 Stat. 12).’’; and 

10 (C) by inserting after paragraph (6) (as 

11 redesignated by subparagraph (A)) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(7) TENANTS HARBOR, MAINE.—The project 

14 for navigation, Tenants Harbor, Maine, authorized 

15 by the first section of the Act of March 2, 1919 (40 

16 Stat. 1275).’’; and 

17 (2) in subsection (h)— 

18 (A) by striking paragraphs (15) and (16); 

19 and 

20 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (17) 

21 through (29) as paragraphs (15) through (27), 

22 respectively. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the Water 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 1014 IS

1 Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110– 

2 114; 121 Stat. 1041). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Jackie CHOATE, Defendant/Appellant. Jackie CHOATE, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Nos. 61878, 63911.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Feb. 1, 1994.

Marcie W. Bower, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Stacy L. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction, by a jury, of first degree robbery, § 569.020, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the trial court as a prior, persistent and class X offender to a thirty year prison term to run consecutively to all other sentences defendant was then serving. He also appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jerry W. Neel, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of J-Kan, Inc., an Arkansas corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: July 14, 2008  /s/ JERRY W. NEEL, JR. Jerry W. Neel, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1138 NORTH ALMA SCHOOL ROAD, SUITE 101

MESA, ARIZONA 85201

Telephone: 480.461.5300 | Fax: 480.833.9392

David R. Schwartz - #009264

das@udallshumway.com

Kimberly R. Davis - #030210

krd@udallshumway.com

Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa 

County Community College District

Maria Wise and Vivian Miranda

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISRICT OF ARIZONA

James Rogers and Judy Ellen Rogers, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

Maricopa County Community College 

District, a political subdivision of 

Arizona; Maria Wise, an individual; and

Vivian Miranda-Strawbridge, an 

individual 

Defendants.

NO. CV2018-00605 PHX-GMS

NOTICE OF CONFERRAL PER 

ORDER (DKT 18) PROPOSED 

EARLY MOTION FOR PARTIAL 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to this Court’s Order (Dkt 18), the parties exchanged letters regarding 

the issues sought to be raised in Defendants’ proposed motion for partial summary 

judgment (Dkt 16). Attached as Exhibit 1 are copies of such letters. Counsel will call 

the Judge’s staff to arrange a time for a pre-motion conference.

DATED: May 30, 2018.

UDALL SHUMWAY PLC

/s/ David R. Schwartz 

David R. Schwartz

Kimberly R. Davis 

1138 North Alma School Road

Suite 101

Mesa, AZ 85201

Attorneys for Defendant Maricopa County 

Community College District, Wise and Miranda

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL Document 20 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 30, 2018, I electronically lodged the attached 

document using ECF for filing and transmitted the document through ECF to the 

following registered ECF users:

Israel G. Torres

James E. Barton, II

Saman Golestan

TORRES LAW GROUP, PLLC

2239 W. Baseline Rd.

Tempe, AZ 85283

Attorneys for Plaintiff

/s/ Kimberly Kershner

5190977.1

109883.024

Case 2:18-cv-00605-DWL Document 20 Filed 05/30/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 08-20516

Montrell Moore, Honorable Sean F. Cox

Defendant..

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING 

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR RESENTENCING

Following his guilty plea under a Rule 11 plea agreement, this Court sentenced

Defendant Montrell Moore (“Defendant”) to a term of 85 months imprisonment on his

conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon.

Defendant then filed an appeal. In an Opinion & Order issued on January 25, 2010, the

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit dismissed the appeal because Defendant had

waived the right to appeal any sentence within the guideline range set forth in his plea

agreement.

Thereafter, Defendant filed a pro se letter with this Court, alleging errors regarding his

sentencing and requesting that the Court vacate his sentence. Defendant’s letter does not cite the

legal authority under which he asks this Court to vacate his sentence.

The Court notes that Defendant may seek relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which

authorizes a court to set aside or correct a federal sentence imposed “in violation of the

Constitution or laws of the United States.” In view of the strict limitations on availability of
1

Along with Defendant’s copy of this Order, the Court is including a copy of a form,

available on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan’s website, for

filing a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

such relief contained in the Aniterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, however, this

Court is not free to “recharacterize a motion purportedly made under some other rule as a motion

made under § 2255 unless (a) the movant, with knowledge of the potential adverse consequences

of such recharacterization, agrees to have the motion so recharacterized, or (b) the court finds

that, notwithstanding its designation, the motion should be considered as made under § 2255

because of the nature of the relief sought, and offers the movant the opportunity to withdraw the

motion rather than have it so recharacterized.” In re Shelton, 296 F.3d 620, 622 (6th Cir. 2002).

This Court will not recharacterize Defendant’s motion as the one filed under 28 U.S.C. §

2255 and will instead leave it to Defendant to file an appropriate motion to vacate his sentence.1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s letter requesting resentencing is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Sean F. Cox 

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge

Dated: March 25, 2010

I hereby certify that on March 25, 2010, a copy of the foregoing document was served upon

counsel of record by electronic means and upon Montrell Moore via First Class Mail at the

address below:

Montrell Moore #42682-039

FCI Terre Haute

Federal Correctional Institution

P. O. Box 33

Terre Haute, IN 47808

S/Jennifer Hernandez 

Case Manager