alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 815 

Expressing support for recognition of Christopher Columbus and his role 

in the history of the United States and recognizing the importance 

of students learning about Christopher Columbus and the heritage and 

history of the Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 8, 2009 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for recognition of Christopher Columbus 

and his role in the history of the United States and 

recognizing the importance of students learning about 

Christopher Columbus and the heritage and history of 

the Nation. 

Whereas Columbus Day is celebrated the second Monday in 

October every year to honor Christopher Columbus; 

Whereas Christopher Columbus arrived in the Americas on 

October 12, 1492, and is credited with initiating the European colonization of the Americas; 

Whereas tributes and memorials to Christopher Columbus 

exist today in almost every State in the Nation; 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 815 IH 

Whereas the discovery and colonization of the Americas is an 

integral part of the history and heritage of the United 

States; 

Whereas according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 2006, less than half of the country’s 

high school seniors had a basic knowledge of United 

States history; 

Whereas nearly half of the States in the Nation no longer require the teaching of civics and United States history; 

Whereas a proficient knowledge of the history and heritage 

of the United States is important to promoting additional 

civic involvement; and 

Whereas educating today’s young people about the history 

and heritage of the United States is essential to creating 

an informed generation of citizens: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the recognition of Christopher Co3 lumbus and his role in the discovery and history of 

4 the United States; 

5 (2) recognizes that it is important for young 

6 people to learn about Christopher Columbus and the 

7 discovery, heritage, and history of the Nation; and 

8 (3) encourages all people to take advantage of 

9 educational opportunities to learn about Christopher 

10 Columbus’ discovery of the Americas and United 

11 States history. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Axis Technologies Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Erickson, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2010
By:
/s/ James EricksonJames EricksonPrincipal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          31,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  458,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               560,576
<PP&E>                                       8,147,192
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,128,083)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,250,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          967,866
<BONDS>                                      4,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,282,503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,250,369
<SALES>                                      2,565,132
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,565,132
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,427,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (308,281)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,091,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,091,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,091,194)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.27)


</TABLE>
# United Stat es Court of Appeals For the First C ircuit No. 02-1205 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSÉ PADILLA-GALARZA, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA The opinion of this court issued December 12, 2003, is amended as follows: On page 10, second full paragraph, line 4, replac e "boot camp") with 'boot camp'). On page 10, second full paragraph, line 7, replace "six month" with "six-month."
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kevin RAINEY, Appellant. Kevin RAINEY, Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Nos. 61499, 63596.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

Jan. 4, 1994.

Henry Robertson, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Traci J. Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and SMITH and AHRENS, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of trafficking drugs in the second degree § 195.223.3 RSMo Cum.Supp.1992. We find no error, and an opinion would have no prec-edential value. A statement setting forth our reasons for affirmance is being furnished to the parties. Defendant’s appeal from denial of his Rule 29.15 motion was abandoned. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Lacey,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-001-PHX-DJH

AMENDED JUDGMENT OF 

ACQUITTAL

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the 

reason that the jury has returned its verdict, finding the Defendant not guilty as to Count

63. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the Court’s Orders filed April 23, 

2024 and April 26, 2024, the Defendant is hereby discharged as to Counts 19-51, 69-70, 

81, 83-84, 86, 88-92 and 94-99 of the Superseding Indictment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant is hereby 

acquitted and discharged as to these counts only pursuant to Rule 32(k), Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure.

Dated this 26th day of April, 2024.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2084 Filed 04/26/24 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 31945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15820]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 
Notice of Scientific and Technical Meeting on Occupational Exposure to 
Asphalt During Paving Operations: Correction

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 61 FR 28590-28591--
dated June 5, 1996.

Summary: On page 28591, of the above notice, in the first column, the 
date for persons interested in providing comments on the draft document 
was previously announced as June 17, 1996. The date has been changed to 
August 9, 1996. The meeting times, dates, place, and status remain 
unchanged.

Contact Person For More Information: Diane Manning, NIOSH Docket 
Office, 4676 Columbia Parkway, M/S C-34, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45226.

    Dated: June 17, 1996.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 96-15820 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-19-M
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-QSB/A  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
 OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 Commission File Number 000-51817 CHINA MULTIMEDIA, INC.(Name of small business issuer in its charter) Nevada
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)98-0507257
I.R.S. Employer Identification No.  Rm 1901-2, Lucky Building 39 Wellington Street, Central, Hong Kong (Address of principal executive offices) Issuers telephone number (852) 2802-8663 Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes /x / No / / As of January 9, 2007, there were 1,000,000 shares of voting common stock, $.001 par value, of China Multimedia, Inc. issued and outstanding. Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes / / No /x /  - 1 -    Explanatory Note:  We are filing this Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, to reflect changes in Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2.  Any items included in the original report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, that are not included herein, are not amended and remain in effect as of the date of the original filing thereof.  Additionally, this Form 10-QSB/A does not purport to provide a general update or discussion of any other developments subsequent to the original filing.  The filing of this Form 10-QSB/A shall not be deemed to be an admission that the original filing, when made, included any untrue statement of material fact or omitted to state a material fact necessary to make a statement contained therein not misleading.         - 2 -     SIGNATURES  In accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  CHINA MULTIMEDIA, INC.  By: /s/ Wilson Cheung Wilson Cheung, President and Director  Date: August 6, 2007  By: /s/ Wilson Cheung Wilson Cheung, Chief Financial Officer  Date: August 6, 2007       - 3 -
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATIONS



I, William Tay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Actavision Ventures, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 18, 2007



/s/ William Tay

William Tay, President and CEO

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 8.1** 

 

**LIST OF EDAP TMS S.A. SUBSIDIARIES**

**(as of March 16, 2008)**

 

 

| **Name of Subsidiary**  |   | **Juridiction of Incorporation** |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                    |   |                             |
| EDAP TMS France  S.A.   |   | France                           |
| EDAP S.A.               |   | France                           |
| EDAP Technomed S.r.l.   |   | Italy                            |
| EDAP Technomed, Inc.    |   | United States                    |
| EDAP Technomed Co. Ltd. |   | Japan                            |
| EDAP Technomed Sdn Bhd  |   | Malaysia                         |
| EDAP GmbH               |   | Germany                          |
|                    |   |                             |
|                    |   |                             |
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 2 of 8
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 3 of 8
EXHIBIT A

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 220-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT 13.2
                                                                   ------------


                                 CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         In  connection  with  Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-
F/A  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  November  30,  2006 of  Vasogen  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Christopher  J. Waddick,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
       Company.


/s/ CHRISTOPHER J. WADDICK
---------------------------------------------
Christopher J. Waddick
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer),
Vasogen Inc.

May 17, 2007
#### Fred RHEINLANDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 0190-95.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

March 27, 1996.

*528Randy T. Leavitt, Austin, for appellant.

Giselle Horton, Assist. CA, Matthew W. Paul, Assist. State’s Attorney, Austin, Robert A. Huttash, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY] REVIEW*

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted on his plea of nolo contendere for driving while intoxicated. The Third Court of Appeals, however, reversed his conviction and remanded the cause for a new trial because the police officer who stopped his car did not believe at the time that appellant was committing any crime but thought instead that appellant might be ill or having mechanical difficulty with his vehicle. The Court of Appeals held that “before a person driving an automobile may be stopped and lawfully detained by an officer, that officer must have specific articu-lable facts to reasonably suspect that the person stopped is associated with criminal activity.” *Rheinlander v. State,*888 S.W.2d 917, 918 (Tex.App.—Austin 1994). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review because the lower court’s holding raises an important question of law not yet decided by this Court.

Appellant, however, has now died and his attorney has moved this Court to abate his appeal permanently. Under our precedents, the death of an appellant during the pen-dency of his appeal deprives this Court and the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction. *Ryan v. State,*891 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). Accordingly, the motion to abate is granted, the State’s petition for discretionary review and the State Prosecuting Attorney’s petition for discretionary review are dismissed, and the Austin Court of Appeals is directed to permanently abate the appeal of this cause. Tex.R.Crim.Pro. 9(b).
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT TARA MINERALS CORP. Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  In connection with the transition report of Tara Minerals Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Francis Richard Biscan, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Clifford A. Brown, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.   Date:   November 16, 2009 /s/ Francis Richard Biscan Francis Richard Biscan, Principal Executive Officer   Date:   November 16, 2009 /s/ Clifford A. Brown Clifford A. Brown, Principal Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 32910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16161]




[[Page 32909]]


_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





Department of Labor





_______________________________________________________________________



41 CFR Part 50-203



Administrative Review Board: Correction; Final Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 25, 1996 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 32910]]



DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

41 CFR Part 50-203


Establishment of the Administrative Review Board; Final Rule; 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Labor.

ACTION: Correction to final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulations 
which were published Friday, May 3, 1996 (61 FR 19982). The regulations 
established the Administrative Review Board and consolidated, within 
this one entity, the authority delegated by the Secretary of Labor to 
decide administrative appeals and matters under administrative review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 3, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. O'Brien, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4309, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20210, Telephone (202) 219-
4728.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are the subject of this correction 
established the Administrative Review Board and consolidated, within 
this one entity, the authority delegated by the Secretary of Labor to 
decide administrative appeals and matters under administrative review.

Need for Correction

    The document published on May 3rd contained 92 paragraphs of 
amendment. Due to inadvertence, one sentence in the regulations (that 
being the second sentence in Sec. 50-203.8(a)) was overlooked and not 
included in the amendatory process. This document corrects that 
omission.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication on May 3, 1996 of the final 
regulations (Establishment of the Administrative Review Board) which 
were the subject of FR Doc. 96-9910, is corrected as follows:
    On page 19987, in the third column, insert a new amendatory 
paragraph, entitled paragraph 71a, to read as follows:


Sec. 50-203.8  [Corrected]

    ``71a. In Sec. 50-203.8(a) remove the words ``Trial Examiner(s)'' 
and add, in their place, the words ``administrative law judge(s)'', 
wherever they appear in the second and third sentences.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 20th day of June, 1996.
Robert B. Reich,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 96-16161 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M