alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 120 (Thursday, June 20, 1996)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 31490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15669]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-39; RM-8757]


Television Broadcasting Services; Irma, WI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action dismisses a petition for rule making filed by 
David A. White requesting the allotment of UHF Television Channel 30+ 
to Irma, Wisconsin. See 61 FR 10978, March 18, 1996. No comments were 
received at the Commission stating an intention to file an application 
for Channel 30+ at Irma, Wisconsin. It is Commission policy to refrain 
from allotting a channel absent an expression of interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 96-39, adopted May 24, 1996, and released June 
7, 1996. The full text of this Commission decision is available for 
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's 
Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The 
complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractors, International Transcription Services, 
Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-
3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 96-15669 Filed 6-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2020

a0127 

# Order

Clerk February 4, 2020

159555(22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159555

COA: 346486

Wayne CC: 14

- 004639

- FC

ANTHONY ALEXANDER MADDOX

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September

30, 2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-3634

___________

James Spann, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 * Appeal from the United States

James Purkett, Superintendent, FCC; * District Court for the

Mike Gann, CCA, Farmington * Eastern District of Missouri.

Correctional Center; Don Smith, CCA, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Farmington Correctional Center; *

Gordon Lewis, Lt., Farmington *

Correctional Center; Marvin Johnson, *

CO 1, Farmington Correctional Center, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: May 6, 1998

 Filed: May 11, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges. 

___________
The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri. 

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate James Spann appeals the district court&s grant of summary

1

judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review

of the record and the parties& submissions, we conclude that the district court properly

granted defendants summary judgment on Spann&s failure-to-protect claim, as Spann

failed to produce evidence from which a jury could conclude that defendants acted with

deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of harm from other inmates. See Jackson

v. Everett, No. 97-2359, 1998 WL 156395, slip op. at 3 (8th Cir. Apr. 7, 1998).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML APM Global Commodity FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager ofthe Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 14, 2008                 |                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                          |                  |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |
|                                               |                       |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,301
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,277
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         69,710
<ALLOWANCE>                                        253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,457
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 42
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         14
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  72,405
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,497
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   283
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,780
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,780
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,250
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     799
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   253
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  253
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               253
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

Michael Lacey, et al., 

 

 Defendants.

NO. CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

ORDER RE:

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT 

REPLY ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION 

FOR DISCLOSURE (DOC. 202)

The Court having reviewed and considered Defendant Lacey’s Motion for Extension of 

Time to Submit Reply on Defendant’s Motion for Disclosure, with no objection by the 

Government, and good cause showing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED extending the otherwise applicable time for filing the Reply 

on Defendant’s Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 202) for a period of three weeks and the response will 

be due on or before August 9, 2018.

The Court finds excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) from ______________ to 

__________.

Dated: _________________

__________________________

Honorable Steve Logan

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 221-1 Filed 07/17/18 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Willie F Williams, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company,

Defendant.

No. CV-18-00061-TUC-DCB

ORDER 

The court having been notified that this case has been settled by the parties.

IT IS ORDERED that the case is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of the 

Court shall close it.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file the appropriate dismissal 

documents within 30 days of the filing of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court retains jurisdiction over this matter 

to reopen the case and return it to the Court's active docket, in the event problems arise in 

relation to its settlement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this 

Order to Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald.

Dated this 20th day of September, 2019.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lacey - 001 

James Larkin - 002 

Scott Spear - 003 

John Brunst - 004 

Dan Hyer - 005 

Andrew Padilla - 006 

Joye Vaught - 007, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-18-00422-PHX-SMB 

ORDER 

 Having considered Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Late File Reply in support of 

Motion for further Clarification re Order Allowing the Government to Continue Review of 

Privileged Communications, and good cause appearing; 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

 Dated this 22nd day of April, 2019. 

 

 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 536 Filed 04/22/19 Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02
- 13
- 00017
- CV
IN RE ERIC ANDIKA RELATOR

---------- ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- This court has considered relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus and the response to the petition filed by the State of Texas. Because the trial court has granted the relief that relator requested in his petition, we deny the petition as

moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 2.8 (a) ; In re Martinez , 131 S.W.3d 514 , 514 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2004, orig. proceeding )

.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER , JJ.

DELIVERED: February 11, 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 , 52.8(d)

.
20071-20071-00001\JXS\KMR\3210479.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Jaburg & Wilk, P.C.

3200 N. Central Avenue, 20th Floor

Phoenix, AZ 85012

602.248.1000

Kraig J. Marton (003816)

kjm@jaburgwilk.com

Jeffrey A. Silence (029143)

jxs@jaburgwilk.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Thacker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jeremy Thacker,

Plaintiff,

v.

GPS Insight, LLC; Robert Donat, 

individually,,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:18-cv-00063-DJH

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE 

STATEMENT

(Assigned to Honorable Diana J. 

Humetewa)

Plaintiff here gives notice, pursuant to General Order 17-08, of service upon 

Defendants of Plaintiff’s Third Supplemental Mandatory Discovery Responses on 

August 1, 2018.

DATED this 14th day of August, 2018.

Jaburg & Wilk, P.C.

s/ Jeffrey A. Silence Kraig J. Marton

Jeffrey A. Silence

3200 N. Central Avenue, 20th Floor

Phoenix, AZ 85012

Attorneys for Plaintiff Thacker

Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 85 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Certificate of Service

ORIGINAL of the forgoing emailed 

this 14th day of August, 2018 to: 

Carrie M. Francis

Stefan M. Palys

Michael A. Vincent

Stinson Leonard Street, LLP

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 2100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4584

Carrie.francis@stinson.com

Stefan.palys@stinson.com

Michael.vincent@stinson.com

Attorneys for Defendants GPS Insight, LLC

Timothy B. O’Connor

Schneider & Onofry, PC

365 East Coronado Road

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

toconnor@soarizonalaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Donat 

s/ Kim Rogers

Case 2:18-cv-00063-DJH Document 85 Filed 08/14/18 Page 2 of 2
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of
Opencell Biomed Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August
31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Mislav Pavelic, in my capacities set forth below of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|April 4, 2011 | /s/ Mislav Pavelic              
|------------- | --------------------------------
|              | Mislav Pavelic, President       
|              | (as Principal Executive Officer)



---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

MICHAEL LACEY; et al., 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 20-10388 

D.C. Nos. 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB-1 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB-2 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB-3 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB-4 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB-6 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB-7 

2:18-cr-00422-SMB 

District of Arizona, 

Phoenix 

ORDER

Appellants’ request to transfer the fee paid in this appeal to their mandamus 

petition, No. 20-73408, is denied without prejudice to renewal in No. 20-73408.

Appellants’ motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. 

2) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); 9th Cir. R. 27-

9.1.

This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court as to 

Appeal No. 20-10388 only.

FILED

DEC 7 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1101 Filed 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2
2 20-10388 

FOR THE COURT:

MOLLY C. DWYER

CLERK OF COURT

By: Megan Howard

Deputy Clerk

Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1101 Filed 12/08/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 18, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 30870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15369]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than July 2, 1996.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (James M. Lyon, Vice 
President) 250 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480:
    1. Louis Lee Madetzke, Bloomington, Minnesota; to acquire an 
additional 3.26 percent, for a total of 26.02 percent, of the voting 
shares of North State Bancshares, Inc., Bloomington Minnesota, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Prime Security Bank, Karlstad, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 12, 1996.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 96-15369 Filed 6-17-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
Exhibit 4.(n)


 


	
  Protective Life Insurance Company

  	
   

  	
  P. O. Box 1928

  	
   

  	
  Birmingham, Alabama 35282-8238

  	
   

  	
  800-456-6330

  



 


ENDORSEMENT TO EXTEND THE ANNUITY
COMMENCEMENT DATE


AND


MODIFY THE DEATH BENEFIT


 


This endorsement is being issued at your request.  In exchange for extending the latest Annuity
Commencement Date available under the Contract to a date not later than the
oldest Owner’s or Annuitant’s 95th birthday,
you agree that future surrenders from the Contract will result in a
proportional adjustment to the Death Benefit.


 


This endorsement supersedes any conflicting terms and provisions in
your Contract (including other endorsements and riders, if any), but the remaining
provisions of your Contract remain in full force and effect except as modified
by this endorsement.


 


In order to effectuate the agreement described in the first paragraph
of this endorsement, your Contract is amended as follows:


 


1.               The second sentence
of the ‘Annuity Commencement Date’ provision is deleted and replaced by the
sentence below.


 


“The Annuity Commencement Date may not be later than the oldest Owner’s
or Annuitant’s 95th birthday.”


 


2.               For the purpose of
calculating the death benefit, each withdrawal or partial surrender that occurs
on and after the Effective Date of this endorsement will reduce the Death Benefit
in the same proportion that the amount withdrawn or surrendered, including any
applicable surrender charges, reduced the Contract Value as of the Valuation
Period during which it was taken.


 


Signed by the Company and made a part of your Contract as of this endorsement’s
Effective Date, which is {Date}.


 


	
  Protective Life Insurance Company

  
	
   

  
	
  

  
	
  Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 121 (Friday, June 21, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31949-31950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-15748]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-025-06-1220-00]


Road Closures; Malad Resource Area, Malad City, ID

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Title 43, CFR 8340 and in conformance with 
principles established by the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, notice is hereby given that access to Sawmill Canyon by motorized 
vehicles is prohibited from October 1 until May 15 each year. Careful 
review and analysis in cooperation with the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, 
Power County government, and the public, has concluded that this action 
will reduce trespass problems on the Fort Hall Reservation. 
Approximately 4.4 miles of road would be seasonally closed to motorized 
vehicular traffic. The area closed located in Power County, Idaho, and 
is administered by the Malad Resource Area, Malad City, Idaho.
    All roads on public land in the following sections are covered 
under this notice:

[[Page 31950]]

Boise Meridian

T. 9 S., R. 32 E.,
    Sec. 19, 20, 29 and 32;
    Sec. 30, NE\1/4\SW\1/4\, E\1/2\.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 1996. The closure will remain in effect until 
further notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald W. Kay, Area Manager, Malad 
Resource Area, Bureau of Land Management, 138 S. Main, Malad City, 
Idaho, (208)766-4766.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This area will be closed for the same period 
of time each year (October 1 until May 15) until further notice. This 
closure does not pertain to administrative actions by Bureau of Land 
Management personnel, permittees, or Idaho Fish & Game personnel.

    Dated: June 4, 1996.
Ronald W. Kay,
Area Manager, Malad Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 96-15748 Filed 6-20-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
#### James CHRISTIAN, Employee-Respondent, v. CRISTO’S (Setzer Co.), Employer-Petitioner, United States Fidelity And, Guaranty, Insurer-Petitioner, Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent.

No. 69250.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

July 30, 1996.

Richard J. Fitzgerald, Luke & Conliff, P.C., St. Louis, for Appellant.

Carrie L. Kmoch, St. Louis, for Respondent.

*558Before PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and SIMON and HOFF, JJ.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

Cristo’s Restaurant and its insurer, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company, appeal the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) award of workers’ compensation benefits to James Christian (Christian). Christian appeals the Commission’s award of attorney’s fees. The Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund is not involved in this appeal. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find that no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the award of the Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.