alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the iLinc Communications, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71332) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-113380 and No. 333-123248) of our report dated
June 28, 2007, on the consolidated balance sheet of iLinc Communications, Inc.
as of March 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report
appears in iLinc Communications, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated June 28, 2007,
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Scottsdale, Arizona
June 28, 2007





<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the iLinc Communications, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71332), the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No. 333-135623, 333-123248 and 333-113380) of our report dated
June 13, 2006, on the consolidated balance sheet of iLinc Communications, Inc.
as of March 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the two years then
ended, which report appears in iLinc Communications, Inc.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
June 13, 2006, relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in
this Form 10-K.




/s/ Epstein, Weber & Conover PLC
-----------------------------------

Scottsdale, Arizona
June 28, 2007
#### STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. James A. WARD, a/k/a James Manee, Respondent.

No. 56390.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Sept. 19, 1989.

H. Morley Swingle, Pros. Atty., Cape Gi-rardeau, for appellant.

Marshall Shain, Cape Girardeau, for respondent.

CRIST, Judge.

The State appeals the dismissal of its information. § 547.210, RSMo 1986. Defendant was charged with tampering with a witness. We reverse and remand.

> Section 575.270 provides in part:

> A person commits the crime of ‘tampering with a witness’ if, with purpose to induce a witness or a prospective witness in an official proceeding to disobey a subpoena or other legal process, or to absent himself or avoid subpoena or other legal process, ... he ... uses ... threats....

The State charged defendant in the words of MACH-CR 29.86 except for two instances complained of by defendant. The first was the required allegation of “an official proceeding.” The State charged defendant with trying to induce a named prospective witness to avoid a subpoena “in an official proceeding of the felony prosecutions of several defendants for the sale of marijuana or cocaine.” Second, defendant complains the information was deficient in failing to allege specific facts indicating what the threat was. The State alleged the defendant tampered with a prospective witness “by using threats, namely *907by saying to Stephen Walker 'Never call me again. Nares die.’ ”

We inquire if the information informed defendant of the charges against him so that he could meet them and prevent double jeopardy in the event of acquittal. *State v. Holland,*653 S.W.2d 670, 674 [1] (Mo.banc 1983).

An information must set forth the elements of the offense or it is “fatally defective.” *State v. Puckett,*607 S.W.2d 774, 775 [1] (Mo.App.1980). Under § 575.270, RSMo 1986, “official proceeding” is an element of the offense. The term is included in this information. Therefore the information is not fatally defective.

Defendant correctly complains the information was deficient in not informing him of the specific official proceeding. However, these facts could have been obtained by a bill of particulars. Rule 23.04. The defendant should have requested a bill of particulars because the defect involved here did not require the information to be dismissed. *Puckett,*607 S.W.2d at 775 [2].

Defendant also complains the information was deficient in failing to allege specific facts showing what threats were made to induce a prospective witness to avoid a subpoena. The prosecutor alleged the witness was induced to avoid a subpoena by a verbal threat from defendant to the witness not to call him again because nares die.

This allegation does inform defendant of the specific conduct which constitutes a “threat.” *State v. Kesterson,*403 S.W.2d 606, 611 [7] (Mo.1966). The allegation may be sufficient for finding the life of the prospective witness was thereby threatened if he testified.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded. The State is given leave to amend its information.

CRANDALL, P.J., and REIÑHARD, J., concur.
Administrative Office of the United States Courts FOR COURT USE ONLY

TRANSCRIPT ORDER

DUE DATE:

2AO 435

AZ Form (Rev. )

1. NAME 2. PHONE NUMBER 3. DATE

4. FIRM NAME

5. MAILING ADDRESS 6. CITY 7. STATE 8. ZIP CODE

9. CASE NUMBER 10. JUDGE DATES OF PROCEEDINGS

11. 12. 

13. CASE NAME LOCATION OF PROCEEDINGS

14. 15. STATE

16. ORDER FOR

APPEAL CRIMINAL

NON-APPEAL CIVIL

CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

BANKRUPTCY

OTHER 6SHFLI\

17. TRANSCRIPT REQUESTED (Specify portion(s) and date(s) of proceeding(s) for which transcript is requested)

PORTIONS DATE(S) PORTION(S) DATE(S)

TESTIMONY (6SHFLI\

PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDING

OTHER (6SHFLI\)

VOIR DIRE

OPENING STATEMENT (Plaintiff)

OPENING STATEMENT (Defendant)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Plaintiff)

CLOSING ARGUMENT (Defendant)

OPINION OF COURT

JURY INSTRUCTIONS

SENTENCING

BAIL HEARING

18. ORDER

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL + 1

(original to Court,

copy to ordering party)

FIRST

COPY

# OF

ADDITIONAL

COPIES

DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS

(&heck all that apply) ESTIMATED COSTS

30 DAYS  

PAPER COPY

3')HPDLO

$6&,,HPDLO

14 DAYS  

7 DAYSH[SHGLWHG  

DAILY

 

HOURLY

 

REALTIME

 

E-MAIL ADDRESS

NOTE: IF ORDERING 025(7+$121()250$7,

THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL CHARGE. 19. SIGNATURE

20. DATE

TRANSCRIPT TO BE PREPARED BY

ESTIMATE TOTAL

PROCESSED BY PHONE NUMBER

ORDER RECEIVED DATE BY

DEPOSIT PAID DEPOSIT PAID

TRANSCRIPT ORDERED TOTAL CHARGES

TRANSCRIPT RECEIVED LESS DEPOSIT

ORDERING PARTY NOTIFIED

TO PICK UP TRANSCRIPT TOTAL REFUNDED

PARTY RECEIVED TRANSCRIPT TOTAL DUE

DISTRIBUTION: COURT COPY TRANSCRIPTION COPY ORDER RECEIPT ORDER COPY

'$<6

CERTIFICATION (19. & 20.)By signing below, I certify that I will pay all charges

(deposit plus additional).

Whitney Z. Bernstein (949) 369-3700 November 16, 2018

Bienert, Miller & Katzman PLC

903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 350 San Clemente CA 92672

2:18-cr-00422-SPL Steven P. Logan November 16, 2018

United States v Michael Lacey et al Phoenix AZ

✔

✔ November 16, 2018

✔

tthomas@bmkattorneys.com

/s/Whitney Z. Bernstein

November 16, 2018

Motion Hearing

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 394 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Michael Lacey, et al.,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-422-PHX-SMB

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

The Court having reviewed the stipulation and request of the parties and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS ORDERED granting the stipulation and request to continue the opposition 

and reply dates.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing the United States’ deadline to file any 

response to the estate of former defendant James Larkin’s Motion to Enforce Abatement 

of Prosecution is continued from Friday October 27 2023 to Monday, November 6, 2023

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 1915-1 Filed 10/27/23 Page 1 of 1
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KARP & WEISS, P.C.

3060 North Swan Road

Tucson, Arizona 85712-1225

Telephone (520) 325-4200

Facsimile (520) 325-4224

Stephen M. Weiss

PCC No. 61412

State Bar No. 002261

sweiss@karpweiss.com

Adam C. Page

PCC No. 66148

State Bar No. 025015

apage@karpweiss.com

Attorneys for Defendant Joye Vaught

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff

 v.

7. JOYE VAUGHT

Defendants

CR-18-00422-PHX-SPL (BSB)

DEFENDANT VAUGHT’S NOTICE

OF JOINDER IN DEFENDANT

LARKIN’S RESPONSE TO

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE UNTIMELY

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS

APPLICATION FOR ORDER

REGARDING CRIMINAL

FORFEITURE

(Doc 304)

Defendant Joye Vaught, by and through her undersigned attorney, joins in 

Defendant James Larkin’s Response to Government’s Motion for Leave to File 

Untimely Reply in Support of its Application for Order Regarding Criminal Forfeiture 

(Doc. 304). Defendant Vaught agrees with the arguments made in Defendant Larkin’s 

Response. Defendant Vaught adopts the positions set forth in said Response as if fully 

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 311 Filed 09/18/18 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

set forth herein. The issues raised in the response apply with equal force to Ms. Vaught.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2018.

KARP & WEISS, P.C.

By /s/ Stephen M. Weiss 

Stephen M. Weiss

Attorney for Defendant Vaught

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 18th day of September, 2018, I electronically 

transmitted the foregoing document on behalf of Joye Vaught to the Clerk of the Court 

by filing with the CM/ECF system and I understand a copy of the filing will be emailed 

to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Honorable Steven P. Logan: logan_chambers@azd.uscourts.gov

Reginald E. Jones: reginald.jones4@usdoj.gov

Peter Kozinets: peter.kozinets@usdoj.gov

John J. Kucera: john.kucera@usdoj.gov

Dominic William Lanza: dominic.lanza@usdoj.gov

Margaret Perlmeter: margaret.perlmeter@usdoj.gov 

Kevin M. Rapp: kevin.rapp@usdoj.gov

Andrew Stone: Andrew.stone@usdol.gov

Attorneys for Government

Paul J. Cambria, Jr.: pcambria@lglaw.com

Robert Corn-Revere: bobcornrevere@dwt.com

Bruce S. Feder: bf@federlawpa.com

James C. Grant: jimgrant@dwt.com

Michael D. Kimerer: MDK@kimerer.com

K. C. Maxwell: kmaxwell@bgrfirm.com

Erin E. McCampbell: emccampbell@lglaw.com

Michael L. Piccarreta: mlp@pd-law.com

Rhonda Neff: RNeff@kimerer.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 311 Filed 09/18/18 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.7.1






Exhibit 10.7.1




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009




WHEREAS, TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore
adopted the TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE
JANUARY 1, 2009 (the “Plan”); and



WHEREAS, pursuant to those provisions of the Plan permitting the Company to amend the Plan,
the Company has determined to cease all benefit accruals under the Plan, effective as of the close
of business March 31, 2009;



NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the close of business
March 31, 2009:



1. Section 3.01 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof
to be and read as follows:



Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall not designate any Employee who does not
participate in the Plan on March 31, 2009 as eligible to participate on or after such date.



2. Section 4.01 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following new subparagraph (d) at the
end thereof to be and read as follows:




	 	(d)	 	Cessation of Benefit Accrual. Notwithstanding the foregoing, there shall be no
further accrual of benefits under the Plan as of the close of business March 31, 2009.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed in its name and on
behalf of this        day of      , 2009, effective as stated herein.




TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.




By:

Title:




ATTEST:



	 	 	 
	STATE OF       

COUNTY OF       

	 	§

§

§






This instrument was acknowledged before me on the        day of , 2009, by of Trinity
Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of said corporation.




Notary Public in and for the


State of       



My Commission Expires:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

John Brunst,

Defendant.

No. CR-18-00422-004-PHX-DJH

JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the 

reason that the jury has returned its verdict, finding the Defendant not guilty as to Counts 

2-51 and 63.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the Court’s Order filed April 23, 

2024, the Defendant is hereby discharged as to Counts 66-68, 78-84 and 86-93 of the 

Superseding Indictment. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant is hereby 

acquitted and discharged as to these counts only pursuant to Rule 32(k), Federal Rules of 

Criminal Procedure.

Dated this 23rd day of April, 2024.

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge

Case 2:18-cr-00422-DJH Document 2066 Filed 04/23/24 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6713

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ABEL PARAMA BORROMEO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-89-241)

Submitted: February 13, 1996 Decided: February 29, 1996

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abel Parama Borromeo, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,

Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's garnishment order.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Borromeo, No. CR-89-241

(S.D.W. Va. Apr. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
ex1012.htm


    
      

      

    


    December
4, 2008

     

    Mr. John
W. Bachmann

    Edward
Jones

    12555
Manchester Road

    St.
Louis, Mo. 63131

    


    


    Dear
John:

    This will
confirm the following agreement relating to the deferral of your director’s
retainers and fees for 2009.

     

    1.           All
director’s fees and retainer (“Fees”) payable to you in connection with your
service on the boards of directors (including committees of such boards) of AMR
Corporation and American Airlines, Inc. for the period January 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009, will be deferred and paid to you in accordance with this
letter agreement.

     

    2.           Fees
will be converted to Stock Equivalent Units in accordance with the Procedures
for Deferral of Board Retainers and Fees, as amended and restated, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Plan”).

     

    3.           On
the 30th business day after the date when you cease to be a Director of AMR
Corporation and any affiliates, and cease rendering services, the Stock
Equivalent Units accrued pursuant to the Plan will be converted to cash and paid
to you in a lump sum by multiplying the number of such Stock Equivalent Units by
the arithmetic mean of the high and the low of AMR stock (“fair market value”)
during the month when you ceased to be a Director of AMR Corporation and any
affiliates, and cease rendering services.  Payment cannot be
accelerated.

     

    4.           In
the event of your death, the number of Stock Equivalent Units as of your date of
death will be multiplied by the fair market value of AMR stock during the
calendar month immediately preceding your death, and the amount paid to
Katherine Bachmann.  The payment contemplated by this paragraph 4 will
be made on the 30th
business day following the date of your death.

     

    If the
foregoing is satisfactory to you, please indicate by signing one of the
originals (two are enclosed) and returning it to me.

     

    


    Very
truly yours,

     

    /s/ Kenneth W. Wimberly

     

    Kenneth
W. Wimberly

    Corporate
Secretary

    


    


    


    


    


    


    Accepted
and agreed:

    

      /s/
John W. Bachmann          




    John W.
Bachmann

    


    


    Date
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 125 (Thursday, June 27, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33490-33491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 827]


Approval of Export Manufacturing Activity Within Foreign-Trade 
Zone 9, Honolulu, Hawaii; NIC Americas, Inc. (Medical Devices)

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u),

[[Page 33491]]

the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, Sec. 400.28(a)(2) of the Board's regulations, requires 
approval of the Board prior to commencement of new manufacturing/
processing activity within existing zone facilities;
    Whereas, Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism of 
the State of Hawaii, grantee of FTZ 9, has requested authority under 
Sec. 400.32(b)(1) of the Board's regulations on behalf of NIC Americas, 
Inc., for the manufacture of medical devices under zone procedures for 
export within FTZ 9 (filed 1/25/96, A(32b1)-2-96; FTZ Docket 40-96, 
assigned 5/13/96);
    Whereas, pursuant to Sec. 400.32(b)(1), the Commerce Department's 
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration has the authority to act 
for the Board in making such decisions on new manufacturing/processing 
activity under certain circumstances, including situations where the 
proposed activity is for export only (Sec. 400.32(b)(1)(ii)); and,
    Whereas, the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, acting 
for the Board, pursuant to Sec. 400.32(b)(1), concurring in the 
findings and recommendations of the FTZ Staff and Executive Secretary, 
approves the request;
    Now, therefore, the application for export manufacturing authority 
is approved, subject to the Act and the Board's regulation, including 
Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of June 1996.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-16472 Filed 6-26-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 25, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 32814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-16136]



=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1112-DR]


Illinois; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Illinois, (FEMA-1112-DR), dated May 6, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 14, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pauline C. Campbell, Response and 
Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 
DC 20472, (202) 646-3606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Illinois, is hereby amended to include the following area among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of May 6, 1996:

Champaign County for Individual Assistance and Hazard Mitigation.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
William C. Tidball,
Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 96-16136 Filed 6-24-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 61, Number 110 (Thursday, June 6, 1996)]
[Notices]
[Page 28890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 96-14233]



-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Draft General Management Plan, Manhattan Sites, New York; Notice 
of Availability and Public Comment Period

    Pursuant to Council on Environmental Quality regulations and 
National Park Service policy, the National Park Service (NPS) announced 
the release of the Draft Manhattan Sites General Management Plan/
Environmental Impact Statement, New York in the Federal Register on 
April 8, 1996.
    The Draft General Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement 
was to be on public review from April 15, 1996 to June 14, 1996. Please 
be advised that the review period has been extended to July 1, 1996.
    The National Park Service will continue to conduct public 
meeting(s) during the extended period and will advertise the meeting(s) 
in local media outlets. The purpose of these meetings is to discuss the 
draft plan and its environmental impact statement. Verbal and written 
comments on the plan/EIS will be accepted until July 1, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Joseph T. Avery, 
Manhattan Sites, 26 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005 Telephone (212) 
825-6990.

    Dated: May 31, 1996.
Joseph T. Avery,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 96-14233 Filed 6-5-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M