alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Dongmei Wu, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA SKYRISE DIGITAL SERVICE INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 22nd day of November, 2010.

/s/ Dongmei
WuDongmei Wu Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and will be retained
by China Skyrise Digital Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-40899

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FREDRICK QURAN BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:95-CR-78-2)

_________________________________________________________________

July 1, 1997

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Fredrick Quran Brown appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for possession with intent to distribute cocaine,

contending that the district court erred by denying his motion to

withdraw his guilty plea and by increasing his base offense level

for possession of a firearm. For the following reasons, we AFFIRM.

Brown’s motion to withdraw his plea was entered prior to

sentencing, eight months after he pleaded guilty and after
- 2 -

preparation of the Presentence Investigation Report. The record

does not support Brown’s assertion that , when he entered his

guilty plea, his trial counsel did not properly instruct him on the

plea agreement terms or the effect of the plea process. Nor does

the record support Brown’s assertion that he did not know that the

plea agreement contained an admission that he possessed a weapon

during the commission of the crime charged. In sum, Brown has not

demonstrated that the district court abused its discretion in

denying the motion to withdraw his plea. See, e.g., United States

v. Bond, 87 F.3d 695, 701 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.

Henderson, 72 F.3d 463, 465-66 (5th Cir. 1995).

Regarding Brown’s sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. §

2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a dangerous weapon during a crime

involving the possession of illicit drugs, Brown’s contention that

Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), applies is without

merit. Because the Supreme Court limited Bailey’s holding to

convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) and Brown was not convicted

of violating § 924, Bailey is inapposite. See United States v.

Castillo, 77 F.3d 1480, 1499 n.34 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.

Ct. 100 (1996) and 117 S. Ct. 236 (1996). Brown did not present

any evidence demonstrating his lack of knowledge of the shotgun and

that such lack of knowledge would have made it clearly improbable

that the shotgun was not connected with his drug offense. See

United States v. Broussard, 80 F.3d 1025, 1040-41 (5th Cir.)

(quoting U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1)), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 264

(1996); United States v. Flucas, 99 F.3d 177, 179 (5th Cir. 1996),
- 3 -

cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1097 (1997). The district court did not

clearly err by enhancing Brown’s sentence by two levels. See

United States v. Watson, 966 F.2d 161, 162 (5th Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Northway
Financial, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 , as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer for the Company,
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

         This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.


                                            /s/ WILLIAM J. WOODWARD
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            William J. Woodward
                                            Chairman of the Board, President
                                            and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 23, 2004
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-72877, 333-83115, 333-91767, 333-30242,333-41482, 333-107702 and 333-100566) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-33794) of Vignette Corporation of our report dated January 17, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vignette Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Austin, Texas 

March 9, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                SAVWATT USA, INC.
                             A Delaware Corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  this  amended   Quarterly  Report  of  SavWatt  USA,  Inc.
("Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Isaac
H. Sutton, President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: January 24, 2011                    /s/  Isaac H. Sutton
                                           -------------------------------------
                                      By:  Isaac H. Sutton
                                      Its: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                RADIO ONE, INC.
                          5900 Princess Garden Parkway
                                   7th Floor
                                Lanham, MD 20706
                                 March 22, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          Radio One, Inc. (the "Company") has received a representation letter
from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), the Company's independent public
accountants, in connection with the issuance of Andersen's audit report included
within this filing on Form 10-K. In its letter, Andersen has represented to us
that its audit of the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, were subject to
Andersen's quality control system for the U.S accounting and auditing practice.
Andersen provided this representation in order to give us reasonable assurance
that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards,
that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit
and availability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to the audit.

                                Very truly yours

                                Scott R. Royster
                                Executive Vice President and
                                Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:18-cv-00289-DJH--BSB Document 1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Firstway Enterprises, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stuart
      Posner, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify to the
      best
      of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Stuart Posner


By:
      Stuart Posner


Title:
      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman





Dated:
      May 1, 2008
This opinion is subjec t to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before TANG , LAWRENCE , and RUSSELL , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Erick D. LARA

- RODRIGUEZ Staff Sergeant (E

- 6 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201900 1 88
Decided: 31 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Sentence adjudged 17 April 2019 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Butler, Okinawa, Japan , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Mark D. Sameit, USMC

. Sentence approved by th e convening authority : r eduction to E

- 1, confinement for nine months , forfeiture of $1,120 per month for 12 months, and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

________________________ _ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but may be cited as persuasive authority under

NMCCA Rule of Appellate P rocedure 30.2.

_________________________U nited States v. Lara

- R odriguez , No. 201 9 00 188

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
erro r, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 9, 2016

jam

Order 

Clerk

February 9, 2016

153035 (29)

IN RE COLE

__________________________________

JIMMY RAE COLE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 153035

COA: 329461

JACKSON CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, 

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $25.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$350.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Victory Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                        |  |        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Jonathan J. Ledecky                     
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Jonathan J. Ledecky                         
|                        |  | Title: |  | President and Secretary                     
|                        |  |        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                        |  |       
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |        |  | /s/ Eric J. Watson                          
|                        |  | Name:  |  | Eric J. Watson                              
|                        |  | Title: |  | Chairman of the Board and Treasurer         
|                        |  |        |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### Deborah Anne PILCHAK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 41136.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 13, 1989.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Aug. 1, 1989.

Roger G. Brown, Jefferson City, for appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Stephen D. Hawke, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

*868Before KENNEDY, C.J., and NUGENT and LOWENSTEIN, JJ.

KENNEDY, Chief Judge.

Deborah Anne Pilchak has appealed the denial without an evidentiary hearing of her Rule 27.26 motion filed in June, 1988, by which she sought relief from her 1982 convictions of the sale of cocaine and unlawful use of a weapon.

Pilchak’s convictions were affirmed on direct appeal in *State v. Pilchak,*655 S.W.2d 646 (Mo.App.1983).

After her convictions she filed a Rule 27.26 motion, which was denied by the trial court. That denial was affirmed on appeal by this court. *Pilchak v. State,*705 S.W.2d 599 (Mo.App.1986).

Rule 27.26 was repealed effective January 1, 1988.

The provisions of Rule 27.26 continue to govern Rule 27.26 proceedings which were pending on the repeal date, but that of course is not this case. The present Rule 27.26 motion was filed in June, 1988. We treat the present motion, however, as a Rule 29.15 motion.

One of the marked departures of new Rule 29.15 from old Rule 27.26 is that, whereas Rule 27.26 allowed successive 27.-26 motions in certain cases, Rule 29.15(k) says flatly: “The circuit court shall not entertain successive motions.”

The Rule goes ahead to provide that a Rule 29.15 motion may be filed before June 30, 1988, for relief from a sentence pronounced prior to January 1,1988, “if ... no prior motion has been filed pursuant to Rule 27.26”. Rule 29.15(m). While Pilchak was sentenced before January 1, 1988, she had filed a prior Rule 27.26 motion. Neither Rule 27.26 nor Rule 29.15 provides any remedy for her.

Judgment affirmed.

All concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with this quarterly report of ChromaDex Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending
July 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Frank L. Jaksch Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas C. Varvaro, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 17, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ FRANK L. JAKSCH JR.
|                      |  |  |  | Frank L. Jaksch Jr.    
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | /s/ THOMAS C. VARVARO  
|                      |  |  |  | Thomas C. Varvaro      
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

SOUTHERN DIVISION

STEVEN HILL, #232781 No. 08-13852

Plaintiff, District Judge George Caram Steeh

v. Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen

K. GREEN, et.al.,

Defendants.

 /

AMENDED ORDER

(**Amended as to Correcting Typographical Error**)

Defendants Denise, Dunaj, Green, Ignasiak and VanAcker have moved for an

extension of 60 days to file a response to Plaintiff’s complaint [Docket #13].

Defendants have waived service pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d). The request for

waiver was sent on October 31, 2008; therefore, a response is due 60 days from that date,

on December 30, 2008. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(B).

Having reviewed Defendants’ motion, and being fully advised, the request for a

60-day extension is GRANTED. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before

March 2, 2009.

SO ORDERED

S/R. Steven Whalen 
R. STEVEN WHALEN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: December 17, 2008

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served on the attorneys

and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on December 17, 2008.

S/G. Wilson 

Judicial Assistant
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-3211

_____________________________

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, a Florida 

municipal corporation,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL L. ROSEN, et al.,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction.

September 25, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

RAY, C.J., and WOLF and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Edwin R. Hudson and Luke J. Grabowski of Henry Buchanan, 

P.A., Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

J. Stanley Chapman of Fixel & Willis, Tallahassee, for Respondent.